-------
REPORT
ON
JAMESTOWN RESERVOIR
STUTSMAN CDIMY
NORTH DAKOTA
EPA REGION VI11
WORKING PAPER No, 570
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NORTH DAWDTA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND THE
NORTH DAKOTA NATIONAL GUARD
OCTOBER., 1976
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of North Dakota Study Lakes and Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 12
VI. Appendices 13
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the North Dakota State Depart-
ment of Health for professional involvement, to the North Dakota
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those North Dakota wastewater treatment plant oper-
ators who voluntarily provided effluent samples and flow data.
Norman L. Peterson, Director, and the staff of the Division
of Water Supply and Pollution Control of the Department of Health,
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the
Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General LaClair A. Mel house, the Adjutant General of
North Dakota, and Project Officer Colonel Irvin M. Sande, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the North Dakota National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES AND RESERVOIRS
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
NAME COUNTY
Ashtabula Barnes, Griggs
Audubon McLean
Brush McLean
Darling RenvMle, Ward
Devils Benson, Ramsey
Jamestown Stutsman
LaMoure LaMoure
Matejcek Walsh
Metigoshe Bottineau
Pelican Bottineau
Sakakawea Dunn, McKenzie,
McLean, Mercer,
Mountrail, Wil-
liams
Spiritwood Stutsman
Sweet Briar Morton
Whitman Nelson, Walsh
-------
V..
N. Dak.
Map Location
JAMESTOWN RESERVOIR
0 Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
o 2 4 e a Km.
JAMESTOWN
RESERVOIR
23
Scale
5 Mi.
Jamestown
4710-
4700 —
9850
98*40
-------
JAMESTOWN RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 3806
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Jamestown Reservoir is eutrophic.
It ranked seventh in overall trophic quality when the 14 North
Dakota lakes and reservoirs sampled in 1974 were compared using
a combination of six water quality parameters*. Six of the
water bodies had less median total phosphorus and median dis-
solved orthophosphorus, 11 had less median inorganic nitrogen,
five had less mean chlorophyll a^ and five had greater mean Secchi
disc transparency.
Survey limnologists observed algal blooms at station 2 in
July and September, and submerged macrophytes and phytoplankton
were noted at station 3 in July. Heavy algal blooms have been
reported to occur (Peterson, 1975).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Jamestown Reservoir was
limited by nitrogen at the time the sample was collected (09/17/74).
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at stations 1 and
2 in April but nitrogen limitation at all other sampling stations
and times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—No known point sources impacted Jamestown
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
Reservoir within the 40-kilometer Survey limit* during the
sampling year.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.92 g/m2/year is over
two times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dil-
lon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading. Improvement in the trophic
condition could result if it is possible to reduce the present
incoming phosphorus load in the James River by 55%.
Further investigation is needed to determine the contribution
and the controllability of nutrients from point sources further
upstream at New Rockford and Carrigan as well as nutrients
resulting from land-use practices in the drainage basin (Peterson,
1975).
2. Non-point sources—The James River contributed 90.7% of
the total phosphorus load, and the ungaged minor tributaries and
immediate drainage contributed an estimated 7.1%. However, part
of the load in the James River probably was due to the point
sources further upstream, although the relatively low export
rate of the river (page 10) indicates the point sources may not
be significant phosphorus contributors.
* See Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods, 1973-1976".
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1
4-4-
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 4.86 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 7.5 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 9.2 meters.
4. Volume: 36.670 x 106 m3ttt.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.6 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (tnVsec)*
James River 1,776.7 0.541
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 160.9 0.199
Totals 1,937.6 0.740
2. Outlet -
James River 1,942.5** 0.710
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 60.7 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 47.7 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Henegar, 1975.
ttt Anonymous, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175.
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
4
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Jamestown Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from two or more depths at three stations on the reservoir (see map,
page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton
identification and enumeration; and during the September visit, a
single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal
assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from
each of the stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths
sampled were 9.1 meters at station 1, 7.6 meters at station 2, and
1.8 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXr (MG/L)
CNOCTvr (MCHOMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
OrtTMO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N 1MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLHPYL A (Ur,/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMAHV OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/26/74)
3 SITES
RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
4.9 - 12.5 6.« 5.9
10.0 - 12.0 11.1 11.0
417. - <«45. 431. 427.
8.0 - 8.3 8.2 8.2
154. - 240. 203. 213.
0.111 - 0.271 0.151 0.123
0.026 - 0.055 0.04? 0.046
0.080 - 0.850 0.615 0.670
0.040 - 0.060 0.048 0.045
1.100 - 2.000 1.380 1.200
0.120 - 0.900 0.663 0.710
1.860 - 2.420 1.995 1.940
6.4 - 32.7 19.5 19.4
0.6 - 1.7 1.2 1.2
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS TOR JAMESTOWN RESERVOIR
STOrtET CODE 3bU6
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/17/74)
J SITES
kANGE
23.9 - 25.7
6.2 - b.6
607. - 630.
8.3 - 8.7
214. - 242.
0.213 - 0.262
0.169 - 0.242
0.020 - 0.340
0.050 - 0.100
1.000 - 1.400
0.070 - 0.410
1.280 - 1.530
4.6 - 74.2
0.9 - 2.1
MEAN
24.8
6.9
619.
8.5
227.
0.235
0.206
0.247
0.073
1.120
0.320
1.367
28.4
1.7
MEDIAN
24.7
6.7
619.
8.4
226.
0.232
0.202
0.295
0.070
1.100
0.380
1.340
6.3
2.1
3HU SAMPLING ( 9/17/74)
J SITES
KANGE MEAN MEDIAN
14.1 - 14.9 14.6 14.7
8.2 - 9.0 8.5 8.6
484. - 492. 487. 485.
8.4 - 8.5 8.4 8.4
240. - 266. 249. 245.
0.10/ - 0.163 0.125 0.118
0.067 - 0.082 0.077 0.078
0.020 - 0.080 0.039 0.030
0.070 - 0.140 0.096 0.08S
0.900 - 1.600 1.200 1.150
0.090 - 0.220 0.135 0.115
0.920 - 1.680 1.239 1.180
2.3 - 22.1 10.3 6.6
0.6 - 3.4 1.8 1.4
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/26/74
07/17/74
09/17/74
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling
Date
04/26/74
07/17/74
09/17/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Cyclotella sp_.
2. Chroomonas sp_.
3. Ankistrodesmus s£.
4. Scenedesmus SJD.
5. Crucigem'a sj>.
Other genera
Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira SJD.
Chroomonas sp.
Schroederia sp.
Chroococcus sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Cryptomonas sj).
2. Crucigem'a sp.
3. Aphanizomenon sp.
4. Coccoid cells
5. Microcystis S£.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Algal Units
per ml
7,179
1,341
1,262
316
237
2,287
12,622
6,236
680
486
340
291
146
1.067
3,010
Chlorophyll a
(yg/1)
6.4
19.4
32.7
4.6
6.3
74.2
2.3
6.6
22.1
-------
0.085
0.135
0.135
0.085
0.149
0.149
1.149
1.149
4.4
4.3
25.8
25.3
7
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Jamestown Reservoir was rather high at the time the sample
was collected (09/17/74). Also, the lack of increased yield
with the addition of phosphorus until nitrogen was also added
indicates that the reservoir was nitrogen limited at that time.
Note that the addition of nitrogen alone resulted in a yield
far greater than that of the control.
The April reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation
at station 1 and 2 but nitrogen limitation at station 3; i.e.,
the mean inorganic m'trogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 19/1,
24/1, and 2/1, respectively. Nitrogen limitation is indicated
in July and September (the mean N/P ratios were 3/1 or less at
all sampling stations, and nitrogen limitation would be expected).
-------
8
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the North Dakota
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except
for the high runoff month of May when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in September, 1974, and was completed in August,
1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the North Dakota District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads for unsampled
"minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were esti-
mated using the nutrient loads at station A-2, in kg/km2/year, and multi-
plying by the ZZ area in km2.
No known wastewater treatment facilities within the 40-kilometer
Survey limit* discharged to Jamestown Reservoir or its tributaries
during the sampling year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
9
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None within the Survey limit.
2. Known industrial - None.
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
James River 4,070 90.7
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 320 7.1
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 15 0.3
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 85 1.9
Total 4,490 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - James River 4,570
3. Net annual P loss - 80 kg.
* Estimate based on 60 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
James River 40,885 81.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 3,700 7.3
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 640 1.3
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 5.245 10.4
Total 50,470 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - James River 34,875
3. Net annual N accumulation - 15,595 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
James River 2 23
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Stream:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1)
Unnamed Creek B-l 0.231 2.455
* Estimate based on 60 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
F. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.92 loss* 10.4 3.2
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Jamestown Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.42
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.21
* There was an apparent phosphorus loss during the sampling year. This
may have been due to the unmeasured contributions of the intermittent
tributaries of the reservoir.
-------
12
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1975. Water resources data for North Dakota. Part 1:
Surface water records. U.S. Geol. Surv., Bismarck.
Henegar, Dale, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
ND Game & Fish Dept., Bismarck.
Peterson, Norman L., 1974. Personal communication (point sources
affecting Jamestown Reservoir). ND Dept. of Health, Bismarck.
, 1975. Personal communication (State of North
Dakota lake rankings). ND Dept. of Health, Bismarck.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
13
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LA-
-------
PESCEM OF LSKES *ITH
VALUES
of LAKES WITH HIGHE* VALUES)
CODE
JhU I
380?
3803
3804
3805
380o
3807
3808
3809
3811
3812
381J
38i<*
3815
LAKE. NAME
LAKE ASHTAtsULA
LAKE AUDUdON
o^uirt L*1CE
LAKE
OEViLS
JAMESTOWN RESERVOIR
LAKE LA MOUrtE
MATEJCEK LAKE
LAKE METIGOSHE
PELICAN LAKE
LAKE SAKAKA'«EA (GARRISON
SPIRIT WOOD LAKE
SWEET HRIAR RESEKVOI*
WHITMAN LAKE
MEDUs
TOTAL P
?7 <
6-4 <
77 (
15 (
0 (
54 (
8 (
38 1
92 <
85 (
100 (
46 (
62 (
27 (
J)
9)
10>
2)
0)
7)
1)
5)
12)
11)
13)
6)
6)
3)
ME01AN
54 <
46 1
77 (
38 (
69 (
15 (
8 (
0 (
92 (
100 <
62 <
23 1
85 1
31 1
7)
b)
10)
5)
9)
2)
1)
0)
12)
13)
: 8>
: 3>
! 11>
[ 4)
500-
MEAN SEC
15 '.
46 (
38 (
23 (
31 <
62 I
69 (
8 1
92 (
100 <
85 <
77 1
54 1
0 I
2>
b)
b)
3)
4)
8)
; 9)
: i)
: 12)
: 13)
: ID
! 10)
: 7)
1 0)
MEAN
CHLOHA
8
69
38
0
23
62
5,4
100
ab
77
92
31
15
46
( D
( 9)
< b)
( . 0)
( 3)
( B)
( n
( 13)
( 11)
( 10)
< 12>
( 4)
( 2)
( 6)
15-
MIN 00
62 (
46 (
81 (
38 (
15 (
96 (
4 (
23 t
81 <
31 (
54 <
4 (
96 (
69 (
8)
b)
10)
5)
2)
12)
0)
3)
10)
4)
7)
0)
12)
9)
ME J IAN
OI5S 0*TnO H
3U I
69 (
81 <
23 (
0 (
54 <
8 (
31 <
81 <
100 (
92 (
46 I
62 (
Ib (
5)
V)
10)
3)
0)
7)
1)
4)
10)
13)
12)
6)
8)
2)
1NULX
NO
204
345
392
137
1J8
343
151
200
523
493
485
227
374
188
-------
LAKE5 RANKED SY [NDE* f'OS.
LAKE CODE LAH.E NAME
". 11
^ 3803
S 3S1**
6 3802
7 3806
8 3ttl3
9 3801
10 3808
11 3815
12 31107
13 3905
1<» 3BO<*
INOC* MO
5?3
(.tr.'L
LAKE
BWUSh LAKt
SwEET BrflA
LAKL AOOUdCN
JAMESTOWN SESEKVOIK
SPIRIT KlOOD LAKE
LAKE: ASriTAUULA
MATEJCEK LAKE
WHITMAN LAKE
LAivE LA MOUKE
OEVJLS LAKE
LAKE OAHLING
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet '
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
ftf SdtjTACcr FLO* INFORMATION FOK NUK I H DAKOTA
03/16/76
LAKE CODE 3406
FOUL
JAME.bTO.vN
360bAl
3B06A2
380fcZZ
LJ9A1N/X3E A
KLA UF LAI\t(SQ SM) l^4?.5
SDH-OKA I MAGE
APE A (SO KM) JAN
1942.5
1776.7
165.%
O.lb
0.02«
TOTAL
SUM OF
KEB
0.16
0.011
0.045
MAR
0.43
0.93H
0.246
•«
2.379
0.453
OHAINAOE AREA OF LAKE =
SJH-OWAINAGE AREAS =
MAT
1.33
1.161
0.368
1942.5
1^4P.5
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMb)
JUN JUL AUG
1.56 1.10
0.651 0.261
0.425 0.311
SUMMARY
0.4d
0.2*3
0.136
TOTAL KLOW
TOTAL FLO*
StP
0.45
0.204
0.127
IN =
OUT =
OCT NUtf
0.40 0.22
O.JH 0.104
0.110 0.062
a.dV
8.52
OEC MEAN
0.21 0.71
0.0*6 O.b4l
0.057 0.199
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS (CMS)
MONTH YEA*- MLAN FLOW DAY
3806A1
3B06A2
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
1.3C3
0.6BO
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.161
9.911
6.938
3.653
7.079
0.821
0.136
0.000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5. 550
11.978
2.662
1.019
0.127
0.071
0.011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.510
1.133
0.255
0.099
0.011
21
20
16
22
18
22
5
4
23
19
22
21
20
16
22
18
22
5
4
22
19
22
FLOW UAY
FLO* UAY
FLOW
1.274
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.911
1.416
5.663
7.079
0.934
0.000
0.000
C.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.238
1.699
0.680
0.057
20
17
20
17
0.0
9.911
2.8J2
9.911
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
^ETWIEVAL DATE 7t»/OJ/l6
3H0601
46 5!i 54.0 098 42 24.0 3
JAMEblOWN KESEKVOIS
NOHTH DAKOTA
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 10 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
13 30 0030
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0017
15 00 0030
10 00 0000
10 00 0009
10 00 001B
TIME OfcPTH
OF
UAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
13 30 0030
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0017
15 00 OOJO
10 00 0000
10 00 0009
10 00 0018
00010
nATER
TEMP
CENT
5.1
4.9
4.9
4.9
24.9
24. B
24.7
24.5
14.9
14.9
14.9
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L f
0.113
0.111
0.129
0.134
0.224
0.330
0.21J
0.218
0.103
0.107
0.112
00300
DO
^G/L
10.8
11.0
10.0
6.6
6.4
6.ti
6.6
8.6
8.6
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
6.4
4.6
2.3
00077
TRfrNSP
SECCrii
INCHES
66
&4
132
00031
INCDT LT
KEMNING
PERCENT
1.0
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MlCPOrHO
<«45
445
445
444
625
625
620
618
484
485
484
11EHALE.S
21112C2
00?^ FEET Of^Th CLASS
00400
Ph
5U
B.10
a. ic
B.OO
8.00
6.50
8.40
B.40
8.60
8.42
b.45
8.45
00410
T ALK
CACOj
MG/L
240
216
220
224
224
230
222
232
240
240
24
-------
STOWET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/16
380602
46 bi 56.0 038 42 28.0 3
jAMLaFOWM •'CStHVOlK
NO-Frl UAMJTA
11EPALLS
002? FEET
DEHTH
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
TIME DEPTH
OF
UAY FEET
14 25 0000
14 25 0005
14 25 0015
14 25 0023
14 40 0000
14 40 0005
14 40 0015
14 40 0025
10 25 0000
10 25 001S
10 ?5 0021
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 25 0000
14 25 0005
14 25 0015
14 25 0023
14 40 0000
14 40 0005
14 40 0013
14 40 0015
14 40 0025
10 25 0000
10 ?5 0015
10 ?5 0021
0001U
WATER
TEMP
CtNT
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8,
25.4
24.6
24.0
23.9
14.9
14.5
14.4
00665
PrlOS-TOT
MG/L P
0. 126
0.120
0.120
0.117
0.231
0.234
0.248
0.244
0.117
0.120
0.121
00300
DO
MG/L
11.4
11.4
12.0
7.2
6.8
6.4
6.2
9.0
8.4
«.2
32217
CHLPPHYL
A
UG/L
19.4
6.3
6.6
00077
TR4NSP
SECCHI
INCHES
43
04
54
00031
INCOT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
OCOS4
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICWOMHO
420
420
419
417
630
622
blO
607
489
405
485
00400
bu
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.50
8.40
d.40
8.30
8.47
8.48
8.47
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mu/L
210
206
190
218
214
232
222
226
244
248
246
21112U2
H CLASS 00
00610 00625
NH3-N TOT KJEL
TOTAL N
MG/L MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.070
0.100
0.080
0.090
0.080
0.090
0.100
.300
.200
.200
.200
.100
.000
.000
.100
.300
.100
.000
00630
N02tN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.6*0
0.660
0.670
0.670
0.230
0.290
0.260
0.300
0.030
0.030
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTrlO
MG/L P
0.030
0.029
0.028
0.029
0.202
0.210
0.229
0.242
0.079
0.032
0.078
-------
MOrtET HETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/16
33060J
47 01 53.0 098 4b 14.
JAMESTOWN WtSERvO In-
ject 40rfTH UAKOTA
DATE
FHOM
TO
74/04/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
DATE
FROM
ro
74/64/26
74/07/17
74/09/17
TIME OE°TH
OF
DAY FEET
14 05 0000
14 05 0002
14 20 0000
14 20 0006
10 45 OOCO
10 45 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 05 0000
14 05 0002
14 ?0 0000
14 20 0006
10 45 0000
10 45 0005
000 JO
rfATER
TEMP
CENT
12.5
12. b
25.7
25.1
14.1
14.1
00665
^HOb-TOT
MG/L P
0.271
0.270
0.262
0.246
0.154
0.163
00300
DO
MG/L
11.0
6.6
7.8
fl.6
8.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
OG/L
32.7
74.2
22.1
OC077
TWftNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
24
36
24
00031
INCDT LT
RE MM ING
PERCENT
1.0
00094
CNDUCIVY
FIELD
MICHOMHO
427
427
616
613
4*2
491
HEr-ALES
211
0005 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00400
^H
SU
8.35
8.30
8.70
8.7o
8.39
8.41
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
154
154
242
226
266
266
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.140
0.140
1202
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.000
l.BOO
1.400
1.300
1.600
1.600
00630
N02tNU3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.080
0.020
0.040
0.070
0.080
00671
PHOS-UIS
OH 7 HO
MG/L P
0.055
0.055
0.210
0.169
0.067
0.072
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
rfETKIFVAL DAft 76/OJ/la
DATE
FROM OF
lu LJAY
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/23
75/07/19
TIME OEPTH
FEET
38'J^ul
46 55 52.0 098 42 29.0 <•
JAMES
BELl/w JAM£STO«N DAM AT t OUTLET
IIEH-^LCS 211120*.
0000 TErlT l)£t-Tn CLASS 00
13
11
0<*
10
II
z OH
15
50
30
05
35
30
00630
NO«>
-------
STOREf RETRIEVAL UATE 76/03/18
DATE
TO
JH-J6A2
47 OB 20.0 098 46 <»0.0 4
3d 7.5 JIM LA*E
r/j-.MtSTu*N KESErfVUIW
COLVc-T dELOK JI^' LAKE 0AM
HE^ALtS 21112o'
0000 FEET DEHTH CLASS 00
75/08/22 11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 30
11 00
11 00
08 30
09 30
11 10
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.008
0.007
0.460
0.050
0.010
0.025
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.600
1.900
2.700
1.900
4.100
2.750
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
3.02U
0.030
0.120
0.155
0.065
O.OBO
00671
PrtOS-OIS
cmrtu
MG/L P
0.07E
0.040
0.080
0.145
0.145
C.I 60
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L H
0.195
0.140
0.230
0.270
0.330
O.J4S
-------
STOKET KETKIEVAL DATE 76/03/18
3806bl
47 04 51.0 098 43 30.0 4
UNNAMED CHEEK
18 7.s FrtlED
T/J0MESTOWN HESEKVOIK
bi*Ul> ON IjKAVtL RO b.6 HI NW OF FKIED
11EH4LE.S 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/21 15 00
75/04/80 09 30
75/05/04 10 25
75/05/17 10 30
75/06/22 09 00
75/07/19 10 00
75/08/22 10 20
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.028
0.660
9.390
0.005
0.025
0.005
0.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.800
2.700
2.400
1.450
2.900
2.100
2.700
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.570
0.045
0.016
0.165
0.045
0.100
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.095
0.155
0.070
0.022
0.145
0.140
0.120
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.155
0.280
0.180
0.110
0.300
0.280
0.310
-------