U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE ALBERT
KIHGSBLJRY COUN1Y
SOUTH DAKOTA
EPA REGION VIII
WORKING PAPER [Jo,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE ALBERT
KINGSBURY COUNTY
SOUTH DAKOTA
EPA REGION VI11
WORKING PAPER Ito, IJ98
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH DAKOTA IJEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AND THE
SOUTH DAKOTA NATIONAL GUARD
JANUARY, 1976
-------
CONTENTS
Foreward ii
List of South Dakota Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics
111. Lake Water Quality Summary
IV. Nutrient Loadings
V. Literature Reviewed
VI. Appendices
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Dakota Departments of
Environmental Protection and Game, Fish and Parks for professional
involvement, to the South Dakota National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to those wastewater
treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent samples.
Allyn Lockner, Secretary, and Blaine Barker and Duane Murphy,
Department of Environmental Quality; Douglas Hansen, Department
of Game, Fish and Parks; and James Hayden, Director, State Lakes
Preservation Committee provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Duane L. Corning, the Adjutant General of South
Dakota, and Project Officer Colonel Robert D. Chalberg, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the South Dakota National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
Iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
LAKE NAME
Albert
Alvin
Angostura
Brant
Byron
Clear
Clear
Cochrane
Cottonwood
Deerfield
Enemy Swim
Herman
John
Kampeska
Madison
Mitchell
Norden
East Oakwood
West Oakwood
Pa c tola
Pickerel
Poinsett
Red Iron South
Richmond
Roy
Sand
Sheridan
Stockdale
East Vermillion
Wall
Waubay
COUNTY
Kingsbury
Lincoln
Fall River
Lake
Beadle
Marshall
Minnehaha
Deuel
Spink
Pennington
Day
Lake
Hamlin
Codington
Lake
Davidson
Hamli n
Brookings
Brookings
Pennington
Day
Brookings,
Marshall
Brown
Marshall
Brown
Pennington
Custer
McCook
Minnehaha
Day
Lake
-------
Lake Norden
Map Location
LAKES ST. JOHN, ALBERT,
& POINSETT
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
-------
LAKE ALBERT
STORET NO. 4601
I. INTRODUCTION
Due to low daily flows, only a few tributary samples were collected
at Lake Albert, and this report relates to only the lake sampling data.
The few tributary data obtained are included in Appendix E for the record.
II. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Lake Albert is eutrophic. It ranked
twenty-sixth in overall trophic quality when the 31 South Dakota
lakes were compared using a combination of six water quality
parameters*. Twenty-four lakes had less median total phosphorus,
12 had less median dissolved orthophosphorus, 24 had less median
inorganic nitrogen, 23 had less mean chlorophyll a_, and 27 had
greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
Survey limnologists noted very dense algal blooms at all sta-
tions during the July and September sampling visits.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Lake Albert was limited
by nitrogen at the times the samples were collected (April and Sep-
tember). The lake data indicate nitrogen limitation at all sam-
pling stations and times.
* See Appendix A.
-------
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
*H*
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 14.16 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 1.2 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 3.0 meters.
4. Volume: 16.992 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 8.4 years (based on outflow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Unnamed Creek B-l 450.7 0.059
Unnamed Creek C-l 41.4 0.009
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 50.5 0.028
Totals 542.6 0.096
2. Outlet -
Unnamed Creek A-l 556.8** 0.064
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 38.5 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 60.0 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Murphey, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Albert was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples
for physical and chemical parameters were collected from one or more depths
at three stations on the lake (see map, page v). During each visit, a
single depth-integrated (near bottom to surface) sample was composited
from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and
during the first and last visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated
rample was composited for algal assays. Also each tine, a depth-integrated
sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis.
The maximum depth sampled at all stations was 0.6 meters.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
A.
Of J-YSICAL AMU
ICS FOx LAKE
STO-^ET CUOE -»601
(C)
OISS UAY (MG/L)
CNOCTVV (.-C»-0M0)
Prl (STAND UNITSl
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT ^ (MG/D
OPTnO P (MG/D
N02»N03 (MG/I.)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INO^G N (MG/D
TOTAL N
1ST SaMDLlW> < 4/23/7*)
1 SIT£i
P
8.6
9.3
6?l .
8.4
162.
0.269
0.01?
0.050
0.070
2.400
0.123
2.520
4b.l
0.2
ANftE
- Q.C
- 10.6
- 623.
8.6
- 1M7.
- 0.321
- 0.01:!
- 0.120
- 0.1SJ
- 2.800
- 0.270
- 2.850
- 76.1
0.3
ME Arj
8.*
10.1
622.
R.5
184.
0.290
o.oi^
0.080
0.107
?.60.")
0.187
P.beo
61..)
0.'
2'NLl SAMPLING ( 7/12/7*)
3 sITES
MEuiAN RANGE
8.7
10.0
621 .
3.b
1*4.
0.307
O.Olb
0.070
0.100
2.600
0. 170
2.670
S8.*
0.2
24.2
5. fa
135?.
B.
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/23/74
07/12/74
09/20/74
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampli ng
Date
04/23/74
07/12/74
09/20/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Cyclotella sp.
2. Dactylococcopsis sp.
3. Chroomonas sp.
4. Melosira sp.
5. Oscillatoria sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Apham'zomenon sp.
2. Melosira sp.
3. Stephanodisciis sp.
4. Oscillatoria sp.
5. Oocystis sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Aphanizomenon sp.
2. Melosira sp.
3. Oocystis sp.
4. Scenedesmus sp.
5. Stephanodiscus sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Algal Units
per ml
166,067
7,374
2,978
2,269
1,702
5.106
185,496
16,351
2,633
1,019
1,571
977
2.549
25,100
26,711
12,197
1,708
732
610
3,901
45,859
Chlorophyll a_
(yg/1)
48.1
76.1
58.9
139.8
150.1
267.3
98.6
34.8
82.9
-------
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. April sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
b. September sample -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.065
0.115
0.115
0.065
0.292
0.292
1.292
1.292
11.3
12.5
33.4
35.2
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.110
0.160
0.160
0.110
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.464
0.464
1.464
1.464
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
13.1
13.2
36.6
28.7
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Albert Lake was high at the time the samples were collected
(04/23/74 and 09/20/74). Also, in both samples the lack of
growth response with the addition of phosphorus alone, until
nitrogen was also added, indicates that the lake was limited
by nitrogen at those times. Note that the addition of nitrogen
alone resulted in a yield significantly greater than that of
the control.
The lake data indicate nitrogen limitation at all sampling
times; i.e., the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus
ratios were 12/1 or less at all sampling stations and times,
and nitrogen limitation would be expected.
-------
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Murphey, Duane G., 1974. Personal communication (waterbody infor-
mation and morphometry). SD Dept. of Env. Prot., Pierre.
Petrie, Lester R., and L. Rodney Larson, 1966(7). Quality of water
in selected lakes of eastern South Dakota. Rept. of Inv. #1,
SD Water Res. Comm., Pierre.
-------
8
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LA
-------
E DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LME
CODE L6KE
4629 LAKE VFRMILLION
4630 WALL LAKE
4631 WAUdAY LAKE NOkTH
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.211
0.19fc
0.093
MEDIAN
INORO N
0.100
0.160
0.145
500-
MEAN SEC
473.833
441.667
46V. 555
MEAN
CMLOHA
100.800
55.?67
127.033
15-
MIN 00
9.200
7.400
11.400
MEDIAN
OISS OrtTHO
0.092
0.076
0.023
V
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES
LA
< 17)
( 26)
( 21)
( 5)
< 25)
( 0)
( 15)
( 1>
( 29)
( Id)
( 8)
( 2>
( 12)
< 16)
( 14)
( 4)
( 6)
( 7)
( 30)
( 20)
( 13)
( 24)
< 27)
( 23)
( 10)
( 26)
22)
MEAN
CHLOHA
23 (
90 (
93 <
47 (
7 (
83 (
0 (
67 (
20 (
97 (
77 (
33 (
13 (
57 (
53 (
73 <
40 (
17 (
3 (
100 (
63 (
43 (
87 (
60 (
80 (
30 (
70 <
30
7)
27)
28)
14)
2)
25)
0)
20)
6)
29)
23)
10)
4)
17)
16)
22)
12)
5)
1)
30)
19)
13)
2b>
18)
24)
9)
21)
15-
MIN DO
68
63
20
27
73
77
100
5
82
5
88
82
53
1)8
13
17
45
45
58
35
58
45
93
45
35
23
5'
( 20)
( 19)
( 6)
( 8)
( 22)
( 23)
( 30)
( 0)
( 24)
( 0)
( 26)
( 24)
( 16)
( r26)
( 4)
( 5)
( 12)
( 12)
( 17)
( 10)
( 17)
( 12)
( 28)
( 12)
( 10)
< 7)
( 0)
<
MEDIAN
OISS OKTHO P
60
63
100
23
13
90
0
93
3
53
73
10
43
20
30
70
40
85
57
97
85
47
78
17
78
7
67
2
t
(
l
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
IB)
IV)
30)
7)
4)
27)
0)
28)
1)
16)
22)
3)
13)
6)
9)
21)
12)
25)
17)
29)
25)
14)
23)
5)
23)
2)
20)
8)
INDEX
NO
201
3<*0
427
260
123
51V
110
338
124
430
460
202
217
303
253
349
Id4
237
241
530
419
242
4/3
299
455
158
370
22
-------
PERCENT OF L&KES WITH HIGHER VALUES
I 19)
: ID
MEAN
CHLOriA
27 I 8)
37 I 11)
10 ( 3>
15-
MIN
68 1
97 i
30
00
I 20)
1 29)
I 9)
MEDIAN INOE.
OISS ORTnO P
33 (
37 (
SO (
10)
11)
15)
NO
265
304
237
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
INDEX NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2*
25
26
27
2f
4620
4606
4623
4611
4625
4610
4603
4621
4627
4616
4602
4608
4630
4614
4624
4629
4604
4015
4622
4619
4631
4618
4628
4613
4612
4601
4617
!6
PACTOLA RESERVOIR
CLEAR LAKE
LAK? RED IRON SOUTH
ENEMY SHIM LAKE
ROY LAKE
DEERFIELD RESERVOIR
ANGOSTURA RESERVOIP
PICKEREL LAKE
SHERIDAN LAKE
LAKE MITCHELL
ALVIN LAKE
COCHRANE LAKE
WALL LAKE
LAKE KAMPESKA
RICHMOND LAKE
LAKE VERHILLION
BRANT LAKE
MADISON LAKE
LAKE POINSETT
OAKrtOOD LAKE WEST
WAUBAY LAKE NOKTH
OAKrfOOD LAKE EAST
STOCKADE LAKE
ST JOHN LAKE
LAKE HERMAN
LAKE ALBERT
LAKE NORDEN
Si AK£
530
519
473
460
455
430
427
419
370
349
340
338
304
303
299
265
260
253
242
241
237
237
225
217
20?
201
164
»8
-------
LA
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 « feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE. 76/05/03
46G101
44 31 00.0 097 10 00.0 4
LAKE ALBEr>-
46011 SOUTn DAKOTA
DATE
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
74/04/23 12 45 0000
74/07/12 11 00 0000
11 00 0002
74/09/20 14 00 0000
14 00 0002
00010
WATER
TEMk
CENT
8.6
24.5
24.5
16.4
16.4
11EPALES
211
0006 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
00
MG/L
9.8
6.8
6.4
9.6
9.8
00077
TSANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
7
1?
12
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMrlO
621
1374
1374
1294
1294
00*00
PH
su
8.40
9.00
8.90
8.55
8.55
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
182
248
236
256
272
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.150
0.110
0.110
0.030
0.040
1202
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.400
4.500
3.700
4.700
4.400
00630 00671
N02&N03 PriOS-OIS
N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.120
0.100
0.110
0.020K
0.020K
O.Old
0.173
0.137
0.019
0.019
00665
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET MG/L P
74/04/23 12 45 0000 0.321
74/07/12 11 00 0000 0.343
11 00 0001
11 00 0002 0.407
74/09/20 14 00 0000 0.303
14 00 0002 0.310
32217 OP031
CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
48.1
139.8
98.6
1.0
1.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO tiE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STo*£T RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/23
74/07/12
74/09/20
TIME DEPTH
OF
UAY FEET
13 00 0000
10 45 0000
10 45 0002
13 45 0000
13 45 0002
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
8.7
24.2
24.2
16.6
16.6
00300 00077 00094
DO TSA.MSP CNDUCTVr
SECCHl FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
10.0
7.8
5.8
9.6
9.2
9
12
12
621
1369
1369
1296
1296
460102
44 33 15.0 097 09 00.0 4
LAKE ALBERT
46011 SOUTH DAKOTA
090 791
11EP<
iLES
211
OOOo FEET DEPTH CLASS
00400
Ph
SU
8.50
9.00
8.90
8.50
8.50
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
187
234
244
286
280
OOolO
N-13-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.100
0.120
0.040
0.040
1202
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.600
4.000
3.800
4.400
4.500
00630
N026.NO3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.100
0.100
0.020K
0.020K
00671
PrtOS-OIS
UHTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.110
0.102
0.016
0.018
00665
DATE TIME OE"TH PHOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET MG/L P
74/04/23
74/07/12
74/09/20
13 00 0000
10 45 0000
45 0001
45 0002
10
10
13 45 0000
13 45 0002
0.307
0.361
0.357
0.261
0.329
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
76.1
150.1
34.8
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
i.o
i.o
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/U3
00010
DATE TIME OEPTrt rfATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT
7*./04/23 13 10 0000 9.0
74/07/12 10 30 0000 24.4
10 30 0002 ?4.4
74/09/20 13 30 0000 16.3
13 30 0002 16.3
46010J
44 36 00.0 097 09 45.0 4
LAKE ALBERT
46057 SOUTH DAKOTA
090791
11EPALES 2111202
0007 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300
DO
MG/L
10.6
7.8
6.0
8.6
8.6
00077
TSANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
10
12
12
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
623
1352
1352
1283
1283
00400
PH
su
8.60
9.10
9.10
8.42
8.42
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
184
194
187
260
296
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.090
0.090
0.040
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.800
4.400
4.000
4.800
4.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.090
0.100
0.020K
0.020K
00671
PnOS-DlS
OHTHO
MG/L P
0.012
0.095
0.141
0.018
0.019
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/04/23 13 10 0000
74/07/12 10 30 0000
10 30 0002
74/09/20 13 30 0000
13 30 0002
0665
S-TOT
i/L P
0.269
0.365
0.465
0.251
0.272
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
58.9
267.3
82.9
00031
INCDT LT
HEMMING
PERCENT
1.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOKET HETHIEVAL DATE 76/os/o<»
A601A1
<»* 3* 05.0 097 07 <»0.0 4
UNNAMED CRE V
^6 7.5 LAKE MOf1 S.5 M SE TOWN LAKE NOROEN
11EHALES 211120«.
0000 FEtT DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
75/OW12 15 37
75/05/17 12 00
75/06/19 20 35
75/07/12 10 40
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
Mo/L
0.010
0.005
0.005
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
3.150
5.000
3.450
5.500
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.065
0.075
0.070
0.160
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTMO
MG/L P
0.255
0.230
0.200
G.570
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L f>
0.3<»0
O.J20
0.380
O.U40
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/0'.
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MU/L
75/0*/l2 15 07
75/05/17 11 15
75/07/12 10 20
2.200
0.010
0.005
00625 OC610
TOT KJEL NH-J-N
N TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
5.500
0.500
5.000
1.570
0.090
0.230
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTrlO
MG/L P
1.200
0.015
0.560
<•«» 33 30.0 047 10 10.0 4
UNNAMED Crtt.'x
46 7.5 LAKE N03DEN
T/LArvE ALBERT 090791
br?DO ON SEC *0 2.3 Ml S OF H«(Y 28
llEkALLS 211120^.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
1.350
0.070
0.620
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR SOUTH
05/03/76
LAKE COOE 4601
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LA"E(SO KM)
SUH-OP4INAGE
TRIBUTARY APEA'SO KM) JAN
556.B O.C 0.0
450.7 0.0 0.0
41.4 0.0 0.0
64.7 0.0 0.0
55*.9
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZEO F OrfS(CMS)
JUN JUi_ AUG SEP
OCT
NOW
DEC
4601B1
4601U
4601ZZ
0.142 0.283
0.142 0.283
0.0 0.057
0.0 0.170
0
0
0
0
.1^2
.142
.028
.057
0
0
0
0
.085
.057
.028
.057
0.057
0.028
0.0
0.029
0.028 0
0.028 0
0.0 0
0.014 0
.028
.024
.0
.003
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.003
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SUMMARY
iRtA OF LAKE =
IAGE AREAS
556.8
556.6
TOTAL FLO*
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OUT *
1.
0.
15
76
MEAN MONTHLY FLOHS AND OAILr FLOtfS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
A601A1
<*601fll
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I
2
3
it
5
6
7
4
9
T»
Tt
lit
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
7t
7<.
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.000
c.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.006
0.003
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3
8
19
8
1
12
17
19
12
25
6
12
3
b
19
8
I
12
17
19
1?
17
6
FLOW DAY
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.003
0.003
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MEAN
0.0b<*
0.059
0.009
0.028
-------
FLOW INFORMATION FO* SOUTH DAKOTA
05/03/76
LAKE CODE 4601
ALBEKT
MEAN MONTHLY FLOnS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAfc MEAN FLOW DAY
4601C1
4601ZZ
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
T»
T*
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.003
0.003
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.003
0.003
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
3
8
19
6
1
12
17
19
12
25
6
FLO* DAY
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.c
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FLO* DAY
FLOW
------- |