United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
Washington, DC 20460
EPA/540/2-91/001
Number 3
April 1992
&EPA
Innovative Treatment Technologies
Semi-Annual Status Report
(Third Edition)
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
EPA/540/2-91/001
Number 3
April 1992
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
(Third Edition)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Office
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NOTICE
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract
numbers 68-WO-0034 and 68-WO-047. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
11
-------
FOREWORD
In April 1990 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
established the Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to promote the use of innovative treatment technologies for contaminated site
cleanup. TIO's mission is to increase the application of innovative treatment technology by government and industry to contaminated
waste sites, soils, and ground water. One of TIO's goals is the removal of regulatory and institutional barriers to the development and
use of innovative technologies. Another is the provision of richer technology and market information to target audiences of federal
agencies, States, consulting engineering firms, responsible parties, technology developers, technology vendors, and the investment
community.
This report documents the selection and use of innovative treatment in the Superfund program. It will allow better communication
between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. The
information will also enable technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several
years.
As more information becomes available, we plan to expand this document to include cleanup programs other than Superfund. The
use of innovative treatment in Superfund and other EPA waste programs is addressed by a directive, "Furthering the Use of Innovative
Treatment Technologies in OSWER Programs" (OSWER Directive 9380.0-17, June 10,1991). This directive sets forth seven new
initiatives to remove impediments from and create incentives to the use of innovative treatment for Superfund, corrective action under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and underground storage tank cleanups. It is hoped that efforts such as the
directive and this document will increase the reliance on new, less costly, or more effective technologies to address the problems
associated with Superfund, hazardous waste, and petroleum contamination.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, Technology Innovation Office
111
-------
ABSTRACT
This twice-yearly report documents and analyzes the selection and use of innovative treatment technologies in the Superfund
Program. It will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative
technologies to clean up contaminated sites. In addition, the information will enable technology vendors to evaluate the market for
innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years and will be used by EPA's Technology Innovation Office to track
progress in the application of innovative treatment.
Alternative treatment technologies are "alternatives" to land disposal. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative treatment
technologies for which use at Superfund-type sites is inhibited by lack of data on cost and performance. This report documents the use
of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water (in situ), soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix wastes:
• Chemical treatment • In situ flushing • Solvent extraction
• Dechlorination • In situ vitrification • Thermal desorption
• Ex situ bioremediation • Soil vapor extraction • Other technologies
• In situ bioremediation • Soil washing (Air sparging, contained recovery
of oily wastes)
The document includes information on 210 applications of innovative treatment technologies for remedial actions and 18
applications for emergency response actions. It contains several summary lists of the Superfund sites for which innovative treatment
technologies have been selected or used. Table 1 lists the sites by EPA region. Table 2 lists the sites by type of innovative technology
and gives the status of application of the innovative treatment technology. The principal part of the document is Table3, which contains
detailed, site-specific information for sites where innovative treatment has been selected. The information for Table 3 was collected
through analyses of Records of Decision, review of OSWER tracking systems and interviews with EPA regional staff. The information
in that table is analyzed and summarized in narrative and figures in the overview of the document. Table 4, new in this edition of this
report, summarizes performance and operating data on the 21 remedial and removal innovative projects that have been completed.
To obtain a copy of this report, call ORD Publications at (513) 569-7562 and ask for it by number, EPA 540/2-91/001. To receive
future editions of this status report, fill out the back sheet and mail it to the address indicated. Your name will be added to the mailing
list of those receiving the document.
iv
-------
CONTENTS
Notice ii
Foreword iii
Abstract iv
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
List of Abbreviations viii
Acknowledgements ix
Overview
Introduction 1
What are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies? 1
Sources of Information for this Report 1
Increasing Use of Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies 2
Definitions and Summary Statistics for Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies 6
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation 11
Treatment Trains 13
Volume Analysis 14
Summary of Updates to Last Report 15
Contents of this Report 16
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 - EPA Regional Summary for Innovative Treatment Technologies 17
Table 2 - Project Status Summary by Innovative Treatment Technology 21
Table 3 - Detailed Site Information by Treatment Technology 25
Bioremediation (Ex situ) 28
Bioremediation (In situ) 32
Chemical Treatment 35
Dechlorination 36
In situ Flushing 38
In situ Vitrification 41
Soil Vapor Extraction 42
Soil Washing 54
Solvent Extraction 57
Thermal Desorption 58
Other Technologies 62
Table 4 - Data on Operations and Performance for Completed Projects 63
Appendix
A. Remedial Sites Using Established Treatment Technologies A-1
B. Remedial/Removal Sites Using Treatment Trains with Innovative Technologies B-1
VI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Page
1 Remedial Actions: RODs Signed by Fiscal Year 2
2 Remedial Actions: Source Control RODs by Fiscal Year 2
3 Remedial Actions: Overview of All Source Control RODs Through FY 91 3
4 Remedial Actions: Treatment Versus Disposal RODs for Source Control 3
5 Remedial Actions: Summary of Alternative Treatment Technologies Through FY 91 4
6 Remedial Actions: Number of Established Versus Innovative Treatment Technologies 5
7 Selection Trends for Four Innovative Treatment Technologies 5
8 Emergency Responses: Summary of Innovative Technologies Through February 1992 6
9 Bioremediation: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 7
10 Dechlorination: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 7
11 In Situ Flushing: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 8
12 In Situ Vitrification: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 8
13 Soil Washing: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 8
14 Solvent Extraction: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 8
15 Thermal Desorption: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 9
16 Soil Vapor Extraction: Target Contaminants Through Fiscal Year 1991 9
17 Innovative Treatment for VOCs 10
18 Innovative Treatment for Heavy Metals 10
19 Innovative Treatment for PAHs 10
20 Innovative Treatment for PCBs 10
21 Remedial Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of February 1992 11
22 Progress in the Remedial Pipeline - August 1991 to February 1992 12
23 Treatment Trains of Innovative Treatment Technologies Selected for Remedial/Removal Sites 13
24 Quantities of Soil to be Treated by Innovative Technologies 14
vu
-------
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AM Action Memorandum
APC Air Pollution Control
APEG Alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
ARCS Alternative remedial contracts strategy
ATTIC Alternative Treatment Technology Information
Center
BCD Base Catalyzed Dechlorination
BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene
BTX Benzene, toluene, xylene
cy Cubic yards
DCA Dichloroethane
DCE Dichloroethylene
DEHP Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
Ft Feet
FY Fiscal year
gw Ground water
KPEG Potassium hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
MBOCA 4,4' Methylene Bis-2-chloroaniline
NAPL Nonaqueous Phase Liquids
NPL National Priorities List
OERR Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
OSC On scene coordinator
OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
OU Operable Unit
PAHs Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls
PCE Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene)
PCP Pentachlorophenol
PRP Potentially responsible party
RA Remedial action
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RD Remedial design
RODs Records of Decision
RPM Remedial project manager
RSKERL Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
Ada, OK (U.S. EPA)
SARA Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of
1986
SVOCs Semivolatile organic compounds
S/S Solidification/Stabilization
TCA Trichloroethane
TCE Trichloroethylene
TIO Technology Innovation Office
USAGE U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
USDA U. S. Department of Agriculture
VOCs Volatile organic compounds
vni
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document was prepared under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler, work assignment manager for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Technology Innovation Office.
Collecting and analyzing information on 228 applications of innovative treatment technologies and summary information on
RODs required the help of many individuals, including Nancy Dean, Maggie Breville, Jon Bomholm, Jack Burnette and Joe Greenblot
of EPA.
Special acknowledgement goes to the regional and State staff listed as contacts for individual sites. They provided the detailed
information contained and summarized here. Their cooperation and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise on innovative
treatment technologies encourages the application of those technologies at other sites.
IX
-------
OVERVIEW
Introduction
The Technology Innovation Office (TIO) of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) has prepared this Innovative Treatment Tech-
nologies: Semi-Annual Status Report to document the use of the
innovative treatment technologies to remediate Superfund sites. The
report contains site-specific information on Superfund sites (both
remedial and emergency response actions) where innovative treat-
ment technologies are being used. Site managers can use this report
in evaluating cleanup alternatives. Innovative technology vendors
can use it in identifying potential markets. TIO also uses the
information to track progress in the application of innovative treat-
ment.
The report is updated biannually. This April 1992 issue of the report
updates and expands information provided in the January 1991 and
September 1991 reports. Additional information includes 70 innova-
tive treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in fiscal year
(FY) 1991 Superfund Records of Decision (RODs) and more detailed
information on completed projects. (A ROD is the decision document
used to specify the way a site, or part of a site, will be remediated.)
What Are Alternative and Innovative Treatment
Technologies?
Alternative treatment technologies are "alternatives" to land disposal.
The most frequently used alternative technologies are incineration
and solidification/stabilization. Innovative treatment technologies
are alternative treatment technologies for which lack of data on
performance and cost inhibit their use for many Superfund types of
applications. In general, a treatment technology is considered inno-
vative if it has had limited full-scale application. Often, it is the
application of a technology or process to soils, sediments, sludge, and
solid-matrix waste (such as mining slag) that is innovative. Ground-
water treatment after the water has been pumped to the surface often
resembles traditional water treatment technologies; thus, in general,
pump-and-treat or ex situ groundwater remedies are considered
established. In situ bioremediation and other methods to treat ground
water in situ are considered innovative technologies.
This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment
technologies to treat soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste:
• Bioremediation (Ex situ)
• Bioremediation (In situ)
• Chemical treatment
• Dechlorination
• In situ flushing
• In situ vitrification
Soil vapor extraction
Soil washing
Thermal desorption
Other technologies (air
sparging, contained
recovery of oily wastes)
In addition, the nine sites using in-situ bioremediation for ground
water are included with the other in situ bioremediation projects.
Sources of Information for this Report
EPA initially used RODs to compile information on remedial actions,
and Pollution Reports, On-Scene Coordinators Reports, and the
OSWER Removal Tracking System to compile data on emergency
response actions. EPA then verified and updated the draft information
by interviews with remedial project managers (RPMs) and on-scene
coordinators (OSCs). The data concerning project status do not
duplicate data in CERCLIS, EPA's Superfund tracking system. This
report provides more detailed information specifically on the portion
of the remedy pertaining to an innovative technology. In addition,
technologies and sites identified here might differ from information
found in the ROD annual reports and the RODs Database. These
differences are the result of design changes in the treatment trains used
at sites. Such changes might or might not may or may not require
-------
official documentation (that is, a ROD amendment or an Explanation
of Significant Differences).
The information in this report on the selection of containment rem-
edies and established treatment technologies in FY91 is based on a
review of RODs by EPA's Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response (OERR).
Increasing Use of Alternative and Innovative Treatment
Technologies
ROD Statistics. Currently, there are 1,236 sites on or proposed for the
National Priorities List (NPL). Through FY91, ending September 30,
1991,947 RODs had been signed. Most RODs for remedial actions
FIGURE 1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: RODS SIGNED BY
FISCAL YEAR
( Total Number of RODs = 947)
| Total BODs
D Source Control RODs
88 87 88 89 90 91
FlKal YMF
The (Utterance between the total number of RODs and the number of source control RODs is
the number of "groundwater treatment only" or "no action needed" RODs,
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
address the source of contamination, such as soil, sludge, sediments,
solid-type wastes, and nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL). These
RODs are referred to as "source control" RODs. Other RODs address
ground water only or specify that no action is necessary. Figure 1
shows the number of source control RODs relative to the total number
of RODs for each fiscal year.
An analysis of source control RODs allows a comparison of the
frequency of selection of treatment versus containment or disposal to
remedy site contamination. Source control RODs are classified by the
general type of technology selection: (1) RODs specifying some
alternative treatment; (2) RODs specifying containment/disposal
only; (3) RODs specifying other action (such as land use restrictions,
monitoring, or relocation). Figure 2 shows the number of source
FIGURE 2
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SOURCE CONTROL
RODS BY FISCAL YEAR
180-,
Number
of 100_
ROD*
3 Containment, Disposal Only
Other (Institutional Controls,
Monitoring, Relocation)
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Source: USEPA Office ol Emergency and Remedial Response.
-------
control RODs that fall under each category. RODs selecting some
treatment also may include containment of treatment residuals or of
waste from another part of the site.
Overall, 62% of source control RODs have selected at least one
treatment technology for source control (Figure 3). The Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) required that
EPA favor permanent remedies (that is, alternative treatment) over
containment or disposal to remediate Superfund sites. In each year
following the passage of SARA, more than 70% of the RODs contain
provisions for treatment of wastes. The increase is most dramatic in
FY88. Fifty percent of RODs in FY87 selected some treatment for
source control, whereas 70% of RODs in FY88 selected some
treatment (Figure 4). The percentage has grown to 77% in FY 91.
FIGURE 3
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF SOURCE
CONTROL RODS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 91
Containment or
Disposal Only (250) 37%
• Some Treatment (418)
62%
• Includes institutional controls, monitoring, and relocation.
< ) Number of RODs.
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
FIGURE 4
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT VERSUS
DISPOSAL RODS FOR SOURCE CONTROL
on
BU — •
Percent
of
RODs* 40-
/
J
\
^N
A
V
v
V
/"
/
•-.
-•- Some Treatment
-B- Containment/Disposal Only
X
X'
s^
x^
<
/*
\
— *—
o •*
-*^
— o^
Ji
^^
•^B
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Fiscal Year
* RODs - Records of Decision
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Technology Statistics. Another way of illustrating the greater use of
treatment is by quantifying the number and kinds of treatment
technologies selected and used. The remainder of the information
contained in this document focuses on technologies, not RODs. Each
ROD specifying treatment may have selected several alternative
treatment technologies.
Through FY91,489 treatment technologies have been selected in 418
source control RODs. In addition, EPA has selected in situ
bioremediation of ground water for nine sites for a total 498 treatment
technologies. The selection of multiple technologies results from the
-------
use of treatment trains or from the treatment of different wastes or
areas of the site. For the 418 RODs specifying treatment for source
control, Figure 5 lists each type of treatment technology selected and
how often it has been selected or used for source control. The nine in
situ groundwater remedies are included in the totals for in situ
bioremediation. Figure 5 illustrates that, through FY91,42% of the
498 treatment technologies selected were innovative and 58% were
conventional. This report contains summary information on the
innovative treatment technology projects and a list of sites using
established technologies (Appendix A). Information on the estab-
lished treatment technologies for FY91 is based on the review of
RODs by OERR, rather than Regional or State interviews.
FIGURE 5
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
(Total Number of Technologies = 498 )
Established Technologies (288) 58%
Off-site Incineration (85) 17%
On-site Incineration (65) 13%-,
Innovative Technologies (210) 42%
Soil Washing (16) 3%
Solvent Extraction (6) 1%
Ex situ Bioremediation (25) 5%
In situ Bioremediation # (20) 4%
In situ Flushing (16) 3%
— Soil Vapor Extraction (84) 17%
Solidification/Stabilization (128) 26%-*"
D
DDDDDOD
DaDODDDDDD
aannnnDDnn
nnpoannaa
rjrjDnnaon
DDDDDD
Other Established*
(10)2%
Dechlorination (8) 2%
In situ Vitrification (3)<1%
-— Chemical Treatment (1) < 1 %
Thermal Desorption (28) 6%
Other Innovative* (3) < 1%
Note Data are derived from 1982 - 1991 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of
February 1992. More than one technology per site maybe used.
( ) Number of times this technology was selected or used.
"Other" established technologies are soil aeration, in situ flaming, and chemical neutralization. "Other" innovative technologies
are air sparging and contained recovery of oily wastes.
# Includes nine in situ groundwater treatment remedies.
-------
In FY91, for the first time, innovative treatment technologies ac-
counted for half of the treatment technologies selected. This increase
is due, in part, to the large number of soil vapor extraction (SVE)
projects selected in FY91, 33 in FY91 compared to 19 in FY90.
Figure 6 compares the numbers of established and innovative tech-
nologies by fiscal year. Figure 7 shows the selection frequency for the
four most frequently selected innovative treatment technologies,
including SVE, by fiscal year.
Emergency Response Actions. Emergency response actions are
conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of
hazardous substances. Emergency responses do not require RODs.
FIGURE 6
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED
VERSUS INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Number of
Treatment
Technologies
Selected
Established Treatment
Technologies
Innovative Treatment
Technologies
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Fiscal Year
Note: Data are derived from 1982 -1991 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated
design and construction activities as of February 1992. More than one technology
per site may be used.
FIGURE 7
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SELECTION TRENDS FOR
FOUR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
qn_
25-
Ntimh*r nf ?f) —
Time*
Selected 15_
10-
5_
0-
' Includes sites usi
•*• Soil Vapor Extraction
•*• Thermal Desorption
-*• Soil Washing
I-~ —IT5 ""S"""
j
z3r~.
/
z.
^~
^
[^
<>
~z
_— «c
NB
r^K
r
/
s
^
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Fiscal Year
ip ex situ and in situ bioremediation of source material and ground water.
-------
To date, innovative treatment has been used in relatively few emer-
gency response actions. The innovative technologies addressed in
this report have been used 18 times in 15 emergency response actions
(Figure 8). In addition, infrared incineration, no longer considered
innovative, was first used at two emergency response actions.
Many emergency responses involve small quantities of waste or
immediate threats requiring a quick action to alleviate the hazard.
Often, these types of activities do not lend themselves to on-site
treatment approaches. In addition, SARA does not contain the same
preference for innovative treatment for removals as it does for
remedial actions. As a result, the selection of innovative treatment for
removals has remained relatively constant—zero to five selected per
year since FY84.
FIGURE 8
EMERGENCY RESPONSES: SUMMARY OF
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES USED FOR SOURCE
CONTROL
(Total z 18)
Dechtorination (Liquids) (3) 17%
5DDD
1DDDD
IDDOOq
In Situ Vitrification (1) 6%—ApSl
Chemical Treatment (4) 22%'
Solvent Extraction (2) 11%
/Soil Vapor Extraction (1) 5%
— In Situ Flushing (1)5%
-Soil Washing (1)6%
Bioremediation (5) 26%
Hole: Data from the Removal Tracking System, CERCLIS, and phone survey ol regional TA T
offices Includes all protects toe FY 82 - 90 and one project Irom FY 91 as of February 1992
( ) Number of limes the technology was selected or used.
EPA would like to increase the use of innovative treatment methods
to address emergency response problems. One of the seven initiatives
contained in the EPA directive described in the foreword concerns
emergency response actions. It is expected that more innovative
technology will be used for the larger, and less time-critical emer-
gency responses in the future.
Definitions and Summary Statistics for Specific Innovative
Treatment Technologies
The innovative technologies reported in the following tables treat
hazardous wastes in very different ways. The following paragraphs
and figures define the technologies as they are used in this document
and provide summary statistics of the contaminants treated with the
technologies.
EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade
organic contaminants on excavated soil, sludge, and solids. The
microorganisms breakdown the contaminants by using them as a food
source. The end products are typically CO2 and HO. Ex situ
bioremediation includes slurry-phase bioremediation, m which the
soils are mixed in water to form a slurry; and solid phase bioremediation
where the soils are placed in a tank or building and tilled with water
and nutrients. Variations of the latter are called land farming or
composting.
With IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION nutrients, an oxygen source, and
sometimes microbes are pumped into the soil or aquifer under
pressure through wells or spread on the surface for infiltration to the
contaminated material.
Based on the data contained in this status report, BIOREMEDIATION
is being used to treat polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons most fre-
quently in the Superfund program. Figure 9 shows the classes of
contaminants treated with bioremediation and the frequency with
which they are treated.
-------
FIGURE 9
BIOREMEDIATION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Number
of
Superfund
Remedial
SitM
40V
35-
30-
26-
20-
16-
10-
5-
•
32
"
2!
j...
1
'i
PAHs
Other SVOCs
VOCs
Note: At some sites, treatment is for more than one contaminant Treatment may be planned.
ongoing, or completed.
FIGURE 10
DECHLOREVATION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Number
of
Superfund
Remedial
Sites
30-'
25-
20-
15-
10-
5-
n- t
5
t-
f S S S SA
Hi I I I ^
2
2
ffif P-II i i i i By
PCBs Other SVOCs Dioxins
Contaminant
Pesticides'
Note: At some sites, treatment is for more than one contaminant. Treatment may be planned,
ongoing, or completed.
' Includes herbicides
In CHEMICAL TREATMENT the contaminants are converted to
less hazardous compounds through chemical reactions. Chemical
treatment has been used five times in the Superfund program, usually
to reduce a contaminant (hexavalent chromium to the bivalent form)
or oxidize a contaminant (cyanide, for example). Neutralization is
considered to be an available technology and is not included in this
report.
DECHLORINATION results in the removal or replacement of chlo-
rine atoms bonded to hazardous compounds. Figure 10 shows the
classes of contaminants for which EPA has selected dechlorination.
For IN SITU FLUSHING, large volumes of water, at times supple-
mented with treatment compounds, are introduced to the soil, waste
or ground water to flush hazardous contaminants from a site. This
technology is predicated on the assumption that the injected water can
be effectively isolated within the aquifer and recovered. Figure 11
gives the classes of contaminants for which EPA has selected in situ
flushing and the number of times it has selected to treat them.
IN SITU VITRIFICATION treats contaminated soil in place at
temperatures of approximately 3000'F (16WC). Metals are encap-
sulated in the glass like structure of the melted silicate compounds.
Organics may be treated by combustion. Figure 12 describes the
frequency and classes of contaminants for which EPA has selected
vitrification.
SOIL WASHING is used for two purposes. First, the mechanical
action and water (sometimes with additives) physically remove the
contaminants from the soil particles. Second, the agitation of the soil
particles allows the smaller diameter, more highly contaminated fines
to separate from the larger soil particles, thus reducing the volume of
material for subsequent treatment Figure 13 shows the classes of
contaminants found at sites where EPA has selected soil washing.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION operates on the principle that organic
contaminants can be preferentially solubilized and removed from the
waste in the correct solvent. The solvent to be used will vary
depending on the waste to be treated. Figure 14 describes the classes
of contaminants for which solvent extraction is selected most often.
-------
FIGURE 11
IN SITU FLUSHING: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
of
Supertund 15-
RemtdM
Sttee
_'
~
""
f
10
1
pj
1
.4.
1 ifJ
4
MM |J
hrrt*
voc*
OltarSVOCs
Contaminant
PAHS
Note: At some sites, treatment It br more tiun one contaminant. Treatment may be
planned, ongoing, or completed.
FIGURE 12
IN SITU VITRIFICATION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
30-
26-
Nufflbw 20~
of
Supwtund 15-
EaM*%A«flal
nvtitvQWi
OlfOM
8M< 10-
5-
0-
2
i r r i rim*-1
2
1 1 1 T^aT-1
1
fffffr
1
f f f (+f
Matals
Pastfcldm* Other SVOCs
Contaminant
VOCs
Note: At some sites, treatment Is lor more than one contaminant. Treatment may be
planned, ongoing, or completed.
' Includes herbicides.
FIGURE 13
SOIL WASHING: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
30-,
25-
Numbw 20~
ol
Superfund 15-
Rwiwdlal
10 ,
Metal* PAH* Other SVOC« Dtaxint
Contaminant
Pesticides
Note: At torn* site*, treatment If lor more than one contaminant Treatment may bt
planned, ongoing, or completed.
' Include* herbicide*.
FIGURE 14
SOLVENT EXTRACTION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Number
of
Supcrfund
R«n*dl«l
SHn
30 -f
25-
20-
15-
10-
5-
o-r
4
fpfn
^ I ' ' *'r
I I IP-
L L \ \T
Z
St'i'itA.
2
f\f\f\f\4-
1
rill *{
PCB« VOCs PAHs Other SVOCs
Contaminant
Dloxin
Note: At some sites, treatment Is tor more than one contaminant. Treatment may oe
planned, ongoing, or completed.
-------
For THERMAL DESORPTION, the waste is heated in a controlled
environment to cause organic compounds to volatilize from the waste.
The operating temperature for thermal desorption is less than 1000'F
(550°C). The volatilized contaminants will usually require further
control or treatment. Figure 15 lists the contaminants most frequently
treated with thermal desorption in the Superfund program.
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION removes volatile organic constituents
from the soil in place through the use of vapor extraction wells,
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES, a new category in this report, includes
air sparging and the contained recovery of oily wastes (CROW)
technologies. Air sparging involves injecting gas into the aquifer to
attach to volatile contaminants as it percolates up through the ground
water and is captured with a vapor extraction system. The CROW
process displaces oily wastes with steam and hot water. The contami-
nated oils and ground water sweep up into a more permeable area and
are pumped out of the aquifer.
FIGURE 15
THERMAL DESORPTION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Number
of
SltM
30-
25-
15-
10-
5-
i/
t
j
15
^
)
X V
i
J^P
^
f
^
^
' i^l
• _
•
H
P-
i
/S
/
>
^
SA
H
pJ
1
3
[III fr-*
1
3
f f f ipy
r
VOCs
PCBs
Other
SVOCs
Contaminant
Pesticides* Metals
Note: At some sites, treatment is lor more than one contaminant. Treatment may be
planned, ongoing, or completed.
' Includes herbicides.
sometimes combined with air injection wells, to strip and flush the
contaminants into the air stream for further treatment. Vacuum
extraction has been selected with increasing frequency for sites with
volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Figure 16 shows the classes of
VOCs for which soil vapor extraction is selected.
FIGURE 16
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION: TARGET CONTAMINANTS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
75
Number
of
Superfund
Remedial
SUM
»v
25-
20-
15—
10-
5-
=;
u
^
u
y
j
21
••
15
Halogenated
VOCs
BTEX SVOCs
Contaminant
Other Non-
halogenated
VOCs
Note: At some sites, treatment is for more than one contaminant Treatment may be
planned, ongoing, or completed
Analyzing the data contained in this status report further, Figures 17,
18, 19, and 20 show the most frequently selected technologies for
VOCs, metals, PAHs,-and PCBs, respectively.
-------
FIGURE 17
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT FOR VOCS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Soil Vapor Bio- Thermal In Situ Solvant In Situ
Extraction remediation Oworption Ruthlng Extraction Vitrification
Note: MmMaflarwlmtronl^natogynuyteUM<*af*o/n»>/fw.
INNOVA
30V
25-
20-
Number
Of 15-
Superfund
Remedial 10-
Sttea
5-
FIGURE 18
TIVE TREATMENT FOR HEAVY METALS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
,, . 9
f f S S S fM
\
\
4
f / / / / /J
II fflLt
2
fH-H-Hi-
1
Soil In Situ In Situ Chemical
Washing Rushing Vitrification Treatment
Technology
Note: More than one treatment technology may be used at some sites.
FIGURE 19
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT FOR PAHS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
32
30-
25-
Nuntber 20-
of
Superfund 15-
Remediil
Site* 10-1
Bloremadlatlon Soil
Washing
In Situ
Flushing
Solvent Soil Vapor
Extraction Extraction
Note: Mora than one treatment technology may be used at some sites.
10
FIGURE 20
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT FOR PCBS
THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1991
Number
of
Superfund
Remedial
Sites
SO-.
25-
20-
15-
10-
5-
0
Us/ / / / / / /A—
. Trnrrrtij
Thermal
Desorption
Dechlorination
Technology
Solvent
Extraction
Note: More than one treatment technology may be used at some sites.
-------
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Many of the innovative technologies documented in this report have
been selected in the last several years. The design of these projects
typically takes one to three years; therefore, relatively few innovative
technologies have been contracted and installed, and even fewer have
been completed (Figure 21). In the next several years, though, many
projects now in design should become operational.
REMEI
FIGURE 21
)IAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT
FEBRUARY 1992*
PrpdPQinn/ Design Complete/ ,
Technology ilrSSHI; Being Installed/ ~*
in Design operational cc
Soil Vapor Extraction 65 1 8
Thermal Desorption 21 4
Ex Situ Bioremediation 17 7
In Situ Bioremediation # 15 4
Soil Washing 15 1
In Situ Flushing 1 1 5
Dechlorination 6 1
Solvent Extraction 5 1
In Situ Vitrification 3 0
Other Innovative Treatment 3 0
Chemical Treatment ' o 0
TOTAL 161 (76%) 41 (20%)
'roj
imp
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
8
TECHNOLOGIES AS OF
a/*t
feted Total
84
28
25
20
16
16
8
6
3
3
1
(4%) 210
* Data derived from 1982 - 199 1 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities.
# Includes in situ groundwater treatment.
11
-------
Figure 22 shows the number of projects which either entered the projects using innovative treatment technologies 27% are new in FY
remedial pipeline in FY91 or progressed to a new phase (for example, 91 and 25% have moved on to a new phase in the past six months.
design, installation, operation) since August of 1991. Of the 210
FIGURE 22
PROGRESS IN THE REMEDIAL PIPELINE
Innovative Treatment Technology Projects Beginning New Project Phase
Between August 1991 and February 1992
"Predesign" Phase
"Design" Phase
"Design Complete" Phase
"Being Installed" Phase
"Operational" Phase
"Complete" Status II °
0 10 20 30 40 50
Number of Technologies
Note: Total number of innovative technologies is 210.
" Entered pipeline in Fiscal Year 1991.
12
60
-------
Treatment Trains
Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used with
established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment
"trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of
material requiring subsequent treatment, to prevent the emission of
volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address
multiple contaminants within the same medium. Figure 23 presents
the data on treatment trains contained within this report. Appendix B
lists the sites where these treatment trains are being used.
FIGURE 23
TREATMENT TRAINS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES SELECTED FOR REMEDIAL/REMOVAL SITES
Solidification/
Stabilization
Dachlorlnatlon
(2 sites)
on [•••••I IfioSSI
=gj—H^^^-ll^^l
Solidification/
Stabilization
(2 »lt»«)
Solidification/
Stabilization
2 sites
In Situ
Bloramadlation
(2 sites)
In Situ
Bloramadlatton
(1 alto)
L3
-------
Volume Analysis
In addition to analyzing the data collected on the 210 applications of volume analysis provides an indication of the scale of the projects
innovative treatment technology for remedial sites based on contami- involved. Figure 24 shows a summary of this analysis.
nants, EPA analyzed the data based on the volume of soil treated. This
FIGURE 24
QUANTITIES OF SOIL TO BE TREATED BY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Technology
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Bioremediation
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Ex Situ Bioremediation
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Thermal Desorption
In Situ Vitrification
Number of
Superfund
Sites with Data
11
7
55
16
17
6
5
27
3
Quantity (Cubic Yards)
Range Average
5,200 — 650,000 94,000
5,000 — 250,000 89,000
70 — 360,000 56,000
1,800 — 200,000 43,900
1,000 — 100,000 29,000
2,000 — 67,000 26,000
800 — 50,000 23,000
1,600 — 124,000 21,400
3,600 — - 5,000 4,400
14
-------
Summary of Updates to Last Report
Each edition of this report has added new information on the applica-
tions of innovative technologies at Superfund sites as well as updating
the status of innovative projects. The information added, deleted, or
changed in each edition is described below to allow projects to be
tracked from edition to edition.
New in April 1992 report:
Innovative treatment technologies selected in FY 91 RODs
Summary information on the performance of innovative treat-
ment technologies for completed projects.
Summary information on the use of innovative and established
technologies in treatment trains
Deleted in April 1992 report:
Crystal Chemical, TX—In situ vitrification
U.S. Aviex, MI—In situ flushing
Goose Farm, NJ—In situ flushing
Marathon Battery, NJ—Enhanced volatilization
Coleman Evans Wood Preserving, FL—Soil washing and
ex situ bioremediation
Solvent Service, CA—In situ bioremediation
Changes in April 1992 report:
Anderson Development, MI was listed as a Thermal Desorption
project rather than a vitrification project.
Sangamo/Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, IL is no longer
to be treated with in situ vitrification. Instead, the wastes will be
incinerated and it is listed in Appendix A with the other incinera-
tion projects.
GE Wiring Services, PR was listed under thermal desorption
rather than soil washing or chemical extraction.
New in September 1991 report:
Innovative treatment technologies selected in FY 90 RODs
Innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions
Remedial sites where established treatment technologies (for
example, incineration, solidification/stabilization) have been se-
lected
Expanded site/technology tables
Deleted in September 1991 report:
Leetown Pesticide, PA—Bioremediation
Northwest Transformer, WA—In situ vitrification
Harvey Knott, DE—In situ soil flushing
Changed in September 1991 report:
SMS Instruments, NY (Deer Park) was listed under vacuum
extraction instead of thermal desorption.
Dechlorination was classified separately from chemical treatment.
(September 1991)
Bioremediation was divided into ex situ and in situ bioremediation.
(September 1991)
Hardage/Criner, OK: The vacuum extraction remedy selected by
EPA was not included in the court judgement.
Bofers Noble, MI: Thermal desorption is being reconsidered, and
is not included in this report.
15
-------
Contents of this Report
This report contains several summary lists of the Superfund sites for
which innovative treatment technologies have been selected or used.
Table 1 lists the sites by EPA Region. Table 2 lists the sites by the
general type of innovative treatment technology selected and gives
the project status.
Table 3 contains the detailed site-specific data on which the other
tables are based. It shows each site where an innovative treatment
technology has been selected and provides the site information
relevant to the application of that technology.
Table 4 presents information on the completed Superfund projects
which have used innovative treatment technologies. It summarizes
the performance information and operating data from the projects.
Lastly, Appendix A includes a list of NPL sites for which established
technologies have been selected for source control in RODs and
Appendix B provides information on the sites using treatment trains.
16
-------
TABLE 1
EPA REGIONAL SUMMARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table 1 summarizes the innovative treatment technologies used at sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites where
emergency response actions were conducted in each EPA region. As shown in this table, the frequency of use of innovative technologies
varies by region. Nine of EPA's ten regional offices have 10 or more applications of innovative treatment technologies underway.
17
-------
TABLE 1
EPA REGIONAL SUMMARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Oechlorination
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Solvent Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Air Sparging
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
SITE NAME STATE
Kellogg-Deering Well Field CT
Iron Horse Park MA
Re-Solve* MA
GroveI and Wells MA
Silresim MA
Wells G&H MA
Norwood PCBs MA
Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater MA
Re-Solve* MA
O'Connor ME
Pinette's Salvage Yard ME
McKin ME
Union Chemical Co.. OU 1 ME
South Municipal Water Supply Wells NH
Mottolo Supply NH
South Municipal Water Supply Wells NH
Tinkham Garage NH
Ottati & Goss NH
Stamina Mills RI
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Dechlorination
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Dechlorination
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
FAA Technical Center* NJ
Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2* NJ
Myers Property* NJ
Lipari Landfill NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 1 NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 2 NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 4 NJ
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2* NJ
A 0 Polymer, Soil treatment phase NJ
FAA Technical Center* NJ
Garden State Cleaners NJ
South Jersey Clothing NJ
Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2* NJ
Ewan Property* NJ
King of Prussia NJ
Myers Property* NJ
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2* NJ
Ewan Property* NJ
Caldwell Trucking NJ
Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1 NJ
Reich Farms NJ
Waldick Aerospace Devices NJ
General Motors/Central Foundry NY
Applied Environmental Services NY
Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon (Removal) NY
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
April 1992
STATE
REGION 2 (continued)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Dechtori nation
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Crow Technolog/
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Chemical Treatment
Dechlorination
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Applied Environmental Services
Wide Beach Development
Byron Barrel & Drum
Applied Environmental Services
Circuitron Corporation, OU 1
Genzale Plating Company, OU 1
Mattiace Petrochemicals Company
SMS Instruments (Deer Park)
Solvent Savers*
Vestal Water Supply 1-1
American Thermostat
Claremont Polychemical - Soil
Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment
Sarney Farm
Solvent Savers*
GE Wiring Devices
Upjohn Manufacturing Co.
In Situ Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
REGION 4
Ciba-Geigy Corp
Ciba-Geigy Corp
American Creosote Works*
Brown Wood Preserving
Cabot Carbon/Koppers*
Dubose OiI Products
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
PR
PR
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3 PA
Brodhead Creek, OU 1 PA
Bendix PA
Cryochem, OU 3 PA
Henderson Road PA
Lord-Shope Landfill PA
Tyson's Dump PA
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU 1 PA
L.A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge VA
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soil)* VA
Avtex Fibers (Removal) VA
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1 VA
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soil)* VA
U.S. Titanium VA
Arrowhead Associates/Scovi U, VA
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1 VA
Ordnance Works Disposal WV
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
An asterisk indicates that more than one innovative treatment technology will be used for the site.
18
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
EPA REGIONAL SUMMARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
April 1992
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
SITE NAME
STATE
REGION 4 (continued)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
In Situ Flushing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Chemical Treatment
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Dechlorination
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Chemical Treatment
Cabot Carbon/Koppers* FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers* FL
American Creosote Works* FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers* FL
Robins AFB, Landfill and Sludge GA
General Refining (Removal) GA
Smith's Farm Brooks KY
Southeastern Wood Preserving MS
(Removal)*
Southeastern Wood Preserving MS
(Removal)*
Cape Fear Wood Preserving* NC
Charles Macon Lagoon* NC
JADCO-Hughes NC
Cape Fear Wood Preserving* NC
Carolina Transformers NC
Charles Macon Lagoon, OU 1* NC
JADCO-Hughes NC
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, OU 4 NC
Palmetto Wood Preserving SC
Hinson Chemical (Removal) SC
Medley Farm, OU 1 SC
SCRDI Bluff Road SC
Sangamo/Twelve Mile/HartwelI PCB SC
Uamchem SC
Arlington Blending & Packaging TN
Arlington Blending & Packaging TN
REGION 5
Galesburg/Koppers IL
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.* IL
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor IL
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.* IL
Seymour Recycling* IN
Seymour Recycling IN
Ninth Avenue Dump IN
Enviro. Conservation and Chemical IN
Fisher Calo Chem IN
MIDCO I IN
Main Street Well Field • IN
Seymour Recycling* IN
Wayne Waste Reclamation IN
Cliff/Dow Dump* MI
Cliff/Dow Dump* MI
PBM Enterprises (Removal) MI
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Vitrification
In Situ Vitrification
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Soil Vapor Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
REGION 5 (continued)
Rasmussen Dump Ml
Ionia City Landfill MI
Parsons Chemical (Removal) MI
Chem Central MI
Kysor Industrial MI
Springfield Township Dump MI
Sturgis Municipal Well Field MI
ThermoChem, Inc. OU 1 MI
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Dechlorination
Soil Vapor Extraction
Dechlorination
Soil Vapor Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Dechlorination
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent) MI
Verona Well Field, OU 2 MI
Anderson Development (Amendment) MI
Carter Industries MI
Burlington Northern Railroad Tie MN
Treating Plant
Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply MN
Long Prairie GW Contamination MN
University of Minnesota MN
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2 OH
Miami County Incinerator OH
Pristine (Amendment) OH
Zanesville Well Field* OH
United Scrap Lead/SIA OH
Zanesville Well Field* OH
Moss-American* WI
Onalaska Municipal Landfill WI
Hagen Farm WI
Wausau Groundwater Contamination WI
Moss-American* WI
REGION 6
Arkwood
Old Inger Oil Refinery
Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis
Fruitland Drum (Removal)
South Valley
Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard
AR
LA
NM
NM
NM
OK
Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg.) OK
Traband Warehouse (Removal) OK
North Cavalcade Street TX
Sheridan Disposal Services TX
French Limited TX
Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers TX
South Cavalcade Street* TX
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc. TX
An asterisk indicates that more than one innovative treatment technology will be used for the site.
19
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
EPA REGIONAL SUMNARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
April 199Z
TECHNOLOGY
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Air Sparging
REGION 6 (continued)
Koppers/Texarkana
South Cavalcade Street*
United Creosoting
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc.
STATE
TX
TX
TX
TX
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Biorentediation (In situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Dechlorination
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
REGION 7
People's Natural Gas IA
Vogel Paint & Wax IA
Fairfield Coal and Gas IA
Scott Lumber (Removal) MO
Crown Plating (Removal) MO
Lee Chemical MO
Hastings GW Contamination NE
(Col. Ave.)
Hastings GW Contamination NE
(Far Marco)
Hastings GW Contamination, Well #3 NE
Lindsay Manufacturing NE
Waverly Groundwater Contamination NE
In Situ Vitrification
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Thermal Desorption
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
In Situ Vitrification
Rocky Mountain Arsenal OU 16 CO
Chemical Sales Company, OU 1 (RCRA) CO
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)* CO
(RCRA)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, OU 18 CO
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 1 CO
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5 CO
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace)* CO
(RCRA)
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)* MT
Libby Ground Water Contamination* MT
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)* MT
Libby Ground Water Contamination* MT
Wasatch Chemical* UT
Wasatch Chemical* UT
TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Chemical Treatment
Chemical Treatment
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ gw)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Bioremediation (In Situ)
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Bioremediation (In Situ)
In Situ Flushing
SITE NAME
STATE
REGION 9
Gila River Indian Reservation* AZ
(Removal)
Gila River Indian Reservation* AZ
(Removal)
Stanford Pesticide #1 AZ
Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1 AZ
Mesa GW Contamination (RCRA) AZ
Motorola 52nd Street AZ
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area AZ
J.H. Baxter CA
(Coppers Company, Inc. (Oroville)* CA
Castle, AFB, OU 1 CA
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville)* CA
Roseville Drums (Removal) CA
Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose) CA
FairchiId Semiconductor/MTV-I CA
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-11 CA
IBM (San Jose) CA
Intel, Mountain View CA
Intersil/Siemens CA
Monolithic Memories CA
National Semiconductor (ADM) CA
Raytheon, Mountain View CA
Signetics (AMD) CA
Solvent Service* (RCRA) CA
Spectra Physics, OU 1 CA
Teledyne Semiconductors CA
Van Waters & Rogers CA
Watkins-Johnson CA
FMC (Fresno) CA
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville)* CA
Poly-Carb (Removal)* NV
Poly-Carb (Removal)* NV
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Flushing
Soil Vapor Extraction
REGION 10
Union Pacific Railroad Sludge ID
United Chrome Products OR
Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Channel WA
An asterisk indicates that more than one innovative treatment technology will be used for the site.
20
-------
TABLE 2
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 2 lists the applications of innovative treatment technologies at NPL and removal sites by technology and summarizes the
status of the specific technology application. The symbols used in this table are:
PD - In predesign. A site may be considered in predesign if EPA is negotiating the consent decree for the design with the
responsible party, the lead agency is preparing the predesign report, the lead agency is contracting for the design firm,
or the lead agency is conducting a treatability study or field investigation before beginning actual design work.
D - In design. A site is considered in design after the design contractor has begun work.
D/I - This symbol is used if the design work has been completed but installation work has not yet begun when this report is
published.
I - Being installed. An innovative treatment technology is "being installed" after the construction contract has been awarded
and before the treatment system has begun operation. For some technologies, this is a relatively short phase of the project
because they are assembled on site quickly. For other technologies, the period of installation lasts several construction
seasons.
O - Operational. A treatment technology is operational once it is constructed and has been proven to be functional. The
length of time required to complete the operation phase depends on such factors as the nature of the technology, the
quantity of material to be treated, and the concentration of the contaminants at the start of treatment.
C - Completed. A treatment technology project is considered complete when the operation of the treatment technology
ceases. Other site activities may still be planned or ongoing.
21
-------
TABLE 2
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
REGION
01
02
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
07
07
08
08
08
09
09
B1QUEUED1AT10* (EX SITU)
STATUS
Iron Horse Park, MA 0
General Motors/Central Foundry Division, OU 1, NY D
Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3, PA D
L.A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge OU, VA PD
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV PD
American Creosote Works, FL D
Brown Wood Preserving, FL C
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL D
Dubose Oil Products, FL D
Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS (Removal) 0
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC D/I
Charles Macon Lagoon, NC PD
Galesburg/Koppers, 1L D
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI PD
Burlington Northern Railroad Tie Treating Plant, MN 0
Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co., MN 0
Moss-American, WI D
Old Inger Oil Refinery, LA 0
North Cavalcade Street, TX D
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX PD
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA I
Scott Lumber, MO (Removal) C
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT D
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT 0
Wasatch Chemical, UT PD
J.H. Baxter, CA D
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA D
REGION BIOREMEDIATION (IM SITU) STATUS
02 FAA Technical Center, NJ (Ground water) D/I
02 Suope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ PD
02 Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY PD
02 Applied Environmental Services (Ground Water) PD
03 L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1, (Soils), VA PD
04 Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL D
04 Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL (Ground water) D
05 Seymour Recycling, IN C
05 Seymour Recycling, IN (Ground water) 0
05 Cliff/Dow Dump. MI (Ground water) PD
05 Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH PD
05 Onalaska Municipal Landfill, WI D
06 Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM I
06 French Limited, TX D
07 People's Natural Gas, IA (Ground water) PD
REGION
07
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
BIOREMEDIATION (IN SITU) (continued)
Fairfield Coal and Gas, IA D
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT (Ground water) D
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT (Ground water) 0
Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ (Removal) C
Castle AFB, CA (Ground water) D
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA D
Roseville Drums, CA (Removal) C
Poly-Carb, NV (Removal) C
REGION CHEMICAL TREATMENT STATUS
03 Avtex Fibers, VA (Removal) C
04 Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC C
05 PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport Service), MI C
(Removal)
09 Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ (Removal) C
09 Stanford Pesticide #1, AZ (Removal) C
REGION DECHLORINAT10N
01 Re-Solve, MA
02 Myers Property, NJ
02 Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon, NY (Removal)
02 Wide Beach Development, NY
03 Saunders Supply Company, OU 1
04 Smith's Farm Brooks, KY
04 Arlington Blending & Packaging, TN
06 Fruit land Drum, NM (Removal)
06 Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK
06 Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers, TX
07 Crown Plating, MO (Removal)
REGION
02
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
04
IN SITU FLUSHING
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 1,
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 2,
Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 4,
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2,
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
L. A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA
U.S. Titanium, VA
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant), AL
STATUS
PD
PD
C
C
PD
D
PD
I
D
D/I
C
STATUS
0
0
I
I
D
PD
PD
PD
PD
22
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
REGION IN SITU FLUSHING (continued)
04 JADCO-Hughes, NC
05 Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
05 Rasmussen Dump, MI
06 South Cavalcade Street, TX
07 Lee Chemical, MO
09 Poly-Carb, NV (Removal)
10 Union Pacific Railroad Sludge Pit, ID
10 United Chrome Products, OR
REGION SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION
01 Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
01 Groveland Wells, HA
01 Silresim, MA
01 Wells G&H, MA
01 Mottolo Supply, NH
01 South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
01 Tinkham Garage, NH
01 Stamina Mills, RI
02 A 0 Polymer, Soil treatment phase, NJ
02 FAA Technical Center, NJ
02 Garden State Cleaners, NJ
02 South Jersey Clothing, NJ
02 Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ
02 Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY
02 Circuitron Corporation, OU 1, NY
02 Genzale Plating Company, OU 1, NY
02 Mattiace Petrochemicals Company, OU 1, NY
02 SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
02 Solvent Savers, NJ
02 Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY
02 Upjohn Manufacturing Co., PR
03 Bendix, PA
03 Cryochem, OU 3, PA
03 Henderson Road, PA
03 Lord-Shope Landfill, PA
03 Tyson's Dump, PA
03 Arrowhead Associates/ScoviU, OU 1, VA
STATUS
D
D
D
D
PD
C
PD
0
IN SITU VITRIFICATION STATUS
05 Ionia City Landfill, MI D
05 Parsons Chemical (ETM Enterprise), MI (Removal) D/I
08 Rocky Mountain Arsenal, OU 16, CO D
08 Wasatch Chemical, UT PD
STATUS
D
D
PD
PD
PD
D
D
PD
PD
D/I
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
D
PD
I
PD
PD
C
PD
D
0
D
0
PD
REGION SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (continued) STATUS
04 Robbins AFB, Landfill and Sludge Lagoon, OU 1, GA PD
04 Charles Macon Lagoon, OU 1, NC PD
04 JADCO-Hughes, NC D
04 Hinson Chemical, SC (Removal) C
04 Medley Farm, OU 1, SC PD
04 SCRDI Bluff Road, SC D
05 Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 2, IL PD
05 Enviro. Conservation and Chemical (Amendment), IN PD
05 Fisher Calo Chem, IN D
05 MIDCO I, IN PD
05 Main Street Well Field, IN PD
05 Seymour Recycling, IN I
05 Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN PD
05 Chem Central, MI PD
05 Kysor Industrial, MI D
05 Springfield Township Dump, MI PD
05 Sturgis Municipal Well Field, MI PD
05 ThermoChem, Inc., OU 1, MI PD
05 Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent/Raymond Road), MI 0
05 Verona Well Field, OU 2, MI PD
05 Long Prairie Groundwater Contamination, MN D/I
05 Miami County Incinerator, OH PD
05 Pristine (Amendment), OH D
05 Zanesville Well Field, OH PD
05 Hagen Farm, WI D
05 Wausau Groundwater Contamination, WI D
06 South Valley, NM I
06 Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg. 3001), OK D
06 Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX PD
07 Hastings GW Contamination (Colorado Ave), NE D
07 Hastings GW Contamination (Far-Mar Co.), NE D
07 Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3, NE I
07 Lindsay Manufacturing, NE PD
07 Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE 0
08 Chemical Sales Company, OU 1, CO D
08 Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO PD
08 Rocky Mountain Arsenal, OU 18, CO D
08 Sand Creek Industrial, OU 1, CO D
09 Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1, AZ D
09 Mesa Ground Water Contamination, AZ PD
09 Motorola 52nd Street, AZ D
09 Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (North & South Fac), AZ D
09 Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose), CA 0
09 Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-I, CA D
09 Fairchild Semi conductor/MTV-11, CA D
09 IBM (San Jose), CA 0
09 Intel, Mountain View, CA D
23
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
REGION
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (continued!
STATUS
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
REGION
02
02
02
02
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
06
06
06
08
09
09
REGION
01
01
01
02
04
04
06
06
Inters it /Siemens, CA
Monolithic Memories, CA
National Semiconductor and Advanced Micro Device, CA
Raytheon, Mountain View, CA
Signetics (AMD), CA
Solvent Service, CA
Spectra Physics, OU 1, CA
Teledyne Semiconductors, CA
Van Waters and Rogers, CA
Uatkfns-Johnson, CA
Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Channel/Well 12A, UA,
SOIL WASHING
Euan Property, NJ
King of Prussia, NJ
Myers Property, NJ
Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ
American Creosote Works, FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL
Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS (Removal)
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
United Scrap Lead/Si A, OH
Zanesville Well Field, OH
Moss -American, WI
Arkwood, AR
Koppers/Texarkana, TX
South Cavalcade Street, TX
Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5, CO
FMC (Fresno), CA
Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA
SOLVENT EXTRACTION
Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, ME
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
Ewan Property, NJ
General Refining, GA (Removal)
Carolina Transformers, NC
Traband Warehouse, OK (Removal)
United Creosoting, TX
0
PD
PD
D
0
0
I
I
PD
D
I
STATUS
PD
D
PD
D
D
D
0
D/I
D
PD
D
PD
PD
D
D
PD
D
STATUS
PD
D
D/I
PD
C
PD
C
D
REGION
THERMAL DESORPTION
STATUS
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
08
REGION
01
03
06
Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater, MA
Re-Solve, MA
BcKin, ME
Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME
Ottati & Goss, NH
Ca 1 dwell Trucking, NJ
Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1 - Soil Treatment, NJ
Reich Farms, NJ
Waldick Aerospace Devices, NJ
American Thermostat, NY
Claremont Polychemical - Soil Remedy, NY
Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment, NY
Sarney Farm, NY
Solvent Savers, NY
GE Wiring Devices, PR
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU 1, PA
Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA
Ciba-Geigy (Macintosh Plant), AL
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, OU 4, NC
Sangamo/Twelve Mile/Hartwell PCS, SC
Wamchem, SC
Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1, TN
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 2, IL
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor, OU 3, IL
Anderson Development (ROD Amendment), MI
Carter Industries, MI
University of Minnesota, MN
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES
South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
Brodhead Creek, OU 1, PA
Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX
C
PD
D
C
D
D/I
D
D/I
D
D
D
D
PD
D
PD
PO
PD
PD
PD
D
PD
PD
0
0
PD
D
PD
STATUS
D
PD
PD
24
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 3 is the principal part of this document. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for sites where innovative
treatment has been selected. The columns of Table 3 present the following information:
Site Name, State, Region, ROD Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which innovative treatment was selected.
A Record of Decision (ROD) documents the selection of remedy in the remedial program. The date shown in this column is the
date a ROD was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at this site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific type of technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For
example, within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation
may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection
of innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most
frequently selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
25
-------
Media (Quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort was
made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another important parameter regarding the
application.
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be
other contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but are not being addressed by the listed
technology, are not included.
Status
This column gives the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has
been signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties,
procuring the services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design
stage. If a project is in design, the engineering documents needed to contract and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy
is being installed, the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is
operational if it is constructed and is now being operated as a treatment system and it is completed if the goals of the ROD for
that treatment technology have been met and treatment ceases.
One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities to vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever
possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This is identified as the "completion planned" date.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible
panics will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/
construction through its contractors, the State may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible
for managing the remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology is also
identified if the lead agency has selected one.
26
-------
Contacts/Phone
This final column gives the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name is usually
the EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM) (for remedial actions) or On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) (for emergency response
actions) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the State, the name and phone number of the State RPM is also
provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.
27
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
April 1992
Region
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
Site Name, State (ROD
Date)
Iron Horse Park,* MA
(09/15/88)
General Motors/Central
Foundry Division, OU1,
NY (12/17/90)
Uhftmoyer Laboratories,
OU3, PA (12/31/90)
L.A. Clarke & Sons,
Lagoon Sludge OU, VA
(03/31/88)
Ordnance Works
Disposal, UV (09/29/89)
American Creosote
Works,* FL (09/28/89)
See also Soil Washing
Brown Wood Preserving,
FL (04/08/88)
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also In Situ
Bioremediation, Soil
Washing
(Specific site
Technology III Description
Land treatment
Slurry phase
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ (to be used
with iron- based
fixation)
Slurry phase in
tanks
Land treatment
Slurry phase
(Preceded by soi I
washing)
Land treatment
Slurry phase
(Bioremediation of
fines following
soil washing)
Industrial and
railyard waste
Machine shops
Engine casting
facility
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Wood
preserving
Chemical
manufacturing
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving,
Drum storage/
disposal
Wood
preserving;
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Media
(Quantity)
Sludge 25,000
Soil (100,000
cy), Sludge
(91,000 cy
from lagoon),
Sediments
(62.000 cy)
Soil (5,600
cy, combined).
Sediments
Sludge
(quant i ty
unknown)
Soil (13,500
cy)
Soil (fines
from washing
36,500 cy)
Soil (7,500
cy)
Soil (fines
from washing;
approximately
6,400 cy)
III I
Key Contaminants III Status '
Treated
VOCs, PAHs
PCBs
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(Aniline)
PAHs (Creosote)
PAHs
(Carcinogenic)
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
(Creosote)
PAHs (Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP, Bis
(2-ethyl-
hexyOphthalate,
Dimethyl phenol,
DNT), PAHs
Operational; Completion
planned Sunnmer 1995
In design; Design
completion planned Summer
1994
In design; Design
completion planned Winter
1994
P redesign; PD completion
planned Spring 1993
Predesign; PD completion
planned Summer 1993
In design; Design
completion planned Summer
1992. The design will be
a performance spec and is
expected to be available
for bid during this
summer
Completed (see Table 4)
In design; Design
completion planned Spring
1994
Lead Agency and III Contacts/
Treatment 1 Phone
Contractor (if 1
available) III
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; ENSR
Consulting
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal lead/ Fund
financed
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Don McElroy
617-223-5571
FTS-833-1571
Lisa Carson
212-264-6857
FTS-264-6857
Chris Corbet t
215-597-6906
FTS-597-6906
Gene Winger t
215-597-1727
FTS- 597- 1727
Drew Lausch
215-597-1286
FTS-597-1286
Madolyn Streng
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Charles Logan
(FL)
904-488-0190
Kelsey Helton
(FL)
904-488-0190
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-347-2643
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
28
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
(continued)
April 1992
Region
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
Site Name, State (ROD
Date)
Dubose Oil Products, FL
(03/29/90)
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
Emergency Response
Action Memo signed
09/30/90
See also Soil Washing
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving,* NC
(06/30/89)
See also Soil Washing
Charles Macon Lagoon,
NC (09/30/91)
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
(06/30/89)
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(09/27/89)
See also Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Burlington Northern
Railroad Tie Treating
Plant,* MN (06/04/86)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Solid phase
(Windrowing with
aeration and
irrigation in a
barn)
Slurry phase
(preceded by soil
washing)
Slurry phase
(preceded by soil
washing)
Ex Situ
Bioremediation
(Type to be
determined)
Land treatment
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ) (Type to be
determined)
Land treatment
Site
Description
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Wood
preserving
Waste disposal
for charcoal
manufacturing
plant
Wood
preserving
Media I Key Contaminants
(Quantity) Treated
Soil (15,000
cy)
Soil (fines
from 8,000 cy
of soi I)
Soil (2,000 cy
of fines from
20,000 cy of
soil)
Soil (1,000
cy)
Soil (15,200
cy)
Soil (9,200
cy)
Soil (9,500
cy), Sludge
(9,600 cy)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
VOCs, PAHs
PAHs (Benzo(a)-
anthracene,
Benzo(a)pyrene)
SVOCs (PCP,
Creosote,
Phenols), PAHs
VOCs (TCE, BTEX),
SVOCs (Phenol,
Naphthalene)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned Winter
1992; Pilot- scale work
to begin in Summer 1992;
This will be Phase 1 of
RA
Operational; Completion
planned Summer 1993
Design completed but not
installed; Construction
contract being procured;
Construction will begin
this summer
Predesign; PD completion
planned Fall 1992
In design; Design
completion planned Fall
1993
Predesign; PD completion
planned 1992; Design to
be completed in Winter
1993;
Operational; Completion
planned 1994
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available) J
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal lead/Fund
financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp
State lead/Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State-
Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
I Contacts/
Phone
Mike McKibben
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Joe Wheat ley
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE III FORMAT ION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
(continued)
April 1992
Region
5
5
6
6
6
7
Site Name, State (ROD
Date)
Joslyn Manufacturing
and Supply Co., MN
(Project began in 1988)
Moss-American,* UI
(09/27/90)
See also Soil Washing
Old Inger Oil
Refinery,* LA
(09/25/84)
North Cavalcade
Street,* TX (06/28/88)
Sheridan Disposal
Services,* TX
(12/29/88)
Vogel Paint & Wax,* IA
(09/25/89)
Specific
Technology I
Land treatment
(Unlined treatment
unit with
irrigation and
tilling)
Slurry phase
(preceded by soil
washing)
Land treatment
Land treatment
Slurry phase
Land treatment
Site
Description
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Wood
preserving
Industrial
landfill
Paint/ink
formation
Media Key Contaminants
(Quantity) III Treated I
Soil (75,000
cy)
Soil (80,000
cy of fines),
Sediments
(5.200 cy)
Soil (120,000
cy, combined),
Sludge
Soil (22,300
cy)
Sludge (3,000
cy of oi Is and
sludge),
Solids (40,000
cy of soi Is
and sludge I ike
material )
Soil (10,000
cy)
SVOCs (PCP). PAHs
PAHs
VOCs (Benzene,
Ethylbenzene),
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Creosote)
VOCs (Benzene,
Toluene), SVOCs
(Phenols), PCBs
VOCs (Methyl Ethyl
Ketone, BTX)
Status ' Lead Agency and
III Treatment
III Contractor (if
||| available) |
Operational; Completion
planned Fall 1992;
Operations began in 8/89
In design; Design
completion planned 1994
Operational; Completion
planned Spring 1997
In design; Design
completion planned Fall
1992
Predesign; PD completion
planned Summer 1992
Being installed;
Installation completion
planned Spring 1992; One
cell has been
constructed.
PRP lead/State
oversight; ECOVA
Corporation
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Weston, Inc.
State lead/Fund
financed;
Westinghouse
Haztech
(installation);
Operation to be
awarded Spring
1992
State lead/Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Geotech
Engineering and
Testing Services,
Inc.
Contacts/
Phone
Kevin Turner
312-886-4444
FTS-886-4444
Steve Schoff
(MN)
612-296-7827
Betty Lav is
312-886-4784
FTS-886-4784
Paul Sieminski
214-655-6710
FTS-255-6710
Mike Hahn (LA)
504-765-0487
Deborah
Griswold
214-655-6715
FTS-255-6715
Lewis Rogers
(TX)
512-463-8188
Ruth Israeli
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
Steve Jones
913-551-7755
FTS- 276- 7755
Bob Drustrup
(IA)
515-281-8900
n Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
30
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (Ex Situ)
(continued)
April 1992
Region
7
8
8
8
9
9
Isite Name, State (ROD
Date)
Scott Lumber, MO
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/10/87)
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant),* MT
(09/27/89)
See also Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Libby Ground Water
Contamination,* MT
(12/30/88)
See also Bioremediation
In Situ
Wasatch Chemical,* UT
(03/29/91)
See also In Situ
Vitrification
J.H. Baxter,* CA
(09/27/90)
Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also Bioremediation
(In situ). Soil Washing
Spec i f i c
Technology
Land treatment
Land treatment
Land treatment
using two 1-acre
cells; soil is
excavated and mixed
Land treatment on
an asphalt pad
Land treatment
(bioremediation to
be followed by
fixation for
metals)
Slurry phase
(preceded by soi I
washing)
Site
Description
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
Other
inorganic
chemical
manufacturing
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (16,000
cy)
Soil (12,000
cy)
Soil (45,000
cy)
Soil (1,100
cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (fines
from 200,000
cy to be soi I
washed)
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs
( Benzo- ( a) -pyrene)
PAHs (Creosote)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
VOCs (Toluene,
Xylene)
Dioxins, PAHs
SVOCs
(Polychlorinated
ohenols),
'esticides,
Dioxins
Status *
Completed; Operational
11/87 to Fall 1991
In design; Design
completion planned Fall
1992
Operational; Completion
planned 1999
Predesign; PD completion
planned Spring 1992
In design; Design
completion planned Summer
1993
In design; Design
completion planned Spring
1993; This project is
Deing considered as part
of the soi I washing
project
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal lead/Fund
financed;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Bruce Morrison
913-551-5014
FTS-276-5014
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS-585-5414
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS-585-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
FTS-743-2313
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
FTS-330-1526
Mary Masters
415-744-2370
FTS-4840
Fred
Schauff ler
415-744-2365
FTS-484-2365
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
31
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BT TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (In Situ)
April 1992
Reg i on
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
II
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
1
FAA Technical Center,*
NJ (09/26/89)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Swope Oil & Chem Co.,
OU2, NJ (09/27/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Applied Environmental
Services, OU1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extractions)
Applied Environmental
Services, (Ground
Water), NY (06/24/91)
LA Clarke & Sons, OU 1
(Soils),* VA (03/31/88)
See also In Situ
Flushing
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also Ex Situ
Bioremediation; Soil
Washing
Cabot Carbon/Koppers
(Ground water), FL
(09/27/90)
Seymour Recycling,* IN
(09/30/87)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
! Specific
Technology I
1
In situ
bioremediation
In situ soil
bioventing with
vacuum extraction
In situ saturated
soil
In situ ground
water, treated gw
to be reinjected
w/nutrients and H202
In situ
bioremediation
follows creosote
recovery and in
situ flushing
In situ soil
treatment above/
below gw table by
nutrient addition
In situ ground
water treating
above/ be low gw
table by nutrient
addition
In situ soil
Nutrients plowed
into soil
Site
Description
Jet fuel tank
farm
Chemical
reclamation
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving;
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Wood
preserving;
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Media
(Quantity)
I
gw (extraction
wells-30 to 40 ft
deep)
Soil (2 acres to
80 ft deep)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
gw
Soil (15,000 cy,
maximum depth 8 -
10 ft)
Soil (5,000 cy)
gw
Soil
(approximately
200,000 cy, 12
acres to 10 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants ||| Status * I
Treated I
VOCs
SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
DEHP,
2-ethylhexyl-
phalate)
VOCs (TEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate,
Benzo(b)Fluoroan-
thene
VOCs (TEX)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote,
Carcinogenic)
SVOCs (PCP,
Bis(2-ethyl
hexyOphthalate,
DNT,
Dimethylphenol),
PAHs
SVOCs (PCP, Bis(2-
ethylhexyl)
phthalate, DNT,
dimethylphenol),
PAH
VOCs (BTEX),
SVOCs, PAHs
(Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
Design complete;
Going to bid in
April for RA
contract award in
late summer
Predesign; PD
completion planned
1992
Predesign, PD
completion planned
1992
Predesign, PD
completion planned
1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1994
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1994
Completed (see Table
4); Nutrients were
plowed into the soil
during Summer, 1990
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal facility,
FAA Lead
Still in
negotiation
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Geraghty & Miller
Contacts/
Phone
I
Car I a St ruble
212-264-4595
FTS-264-4595
Keith Buch (FAA)
609-484-6644
Joseph Cowers
212-264-5386
FTS-264-5386
Andrew Anglish
(NY) 518-457-
5637
Andrew Anglish
(NY)
518-457-5637
Eugene Wingert
215-597-1727
FTS-597-1727
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-256-2643
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
FTS-886-6552
ft Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
32
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (In situ)
(continued)
April 1992
Region
5
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Seymour Recyc I i ng
(Ground water), IN
(09/30/87)
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(09/27/89)
See also Ex Situ
Bioremediation
Allied Chemical &
Ironton Coke, OU2,* OH
(12/28/90)
Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, WI (08/14/90)
A tchi son/Santa
Fe/Clovis,* NM
(09/23/88)
French Limited, TX
(03/24/88)
Fairfield Coal and Gas,
IA (9/21/90)
People's Natural Gas,
IA (9/16/91)
Specific
Technology
In situ gw
treatment
incidental to soi I
treatment
In situ gw without
addition of
nutrients, oxygen,
or microbes
In situ
bioremediation of
lagoon sediments
In situ soil; Air
injection; no
nutrient or microbe
addition
In situ soil;
landfarm sludges
and cap
In situ lagoon
bioremediation
In situ sludge;
Injection H202,
nutrients &
effluent from gw
treatment
In situ gw
Site
Description
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Waste disposal
for charcoal
manufacturing
plant
Coke
manufacturing
Municipal
landfill
Rail yard
wastes (diesel
spills)
Petrochemical
Coal
gasification
Coal
gasification
Media
(Quantity)
gw (under approx.
12 acres)
gw
Sediments
(457,000 cy from
a lagoon)
Soil (16,000 cy,
11 - 15 ft deep)
Soil (28,600 cy,
combined, to 6 ft
deep). Sludge
Sludge (70,100 cy
combined).
Sediments
Sludge (Coal tars
at 22 - 27 ft
deep)
gw
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs, SVOCs, PNAs
VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs
(Phenol), PAHs
PAHs
SVOCs
(Naphthalene),
PAHs
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons,
Diesel Fuel)
VOCs, PAHs
VOCs (BTEX), PAHs
(Naphthalene)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs
Status '
Operational; Gw
treatment was not
designed but appears
to be occur ing as a
result of in situ
soil treatment
Predesign; PO
completion planned
1992; Design to be
completed Winter
1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Winter 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Being installed;
Completion planned
Spring 1992
In design
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1994; Field
scale pilot test
underway now,
complete in January,
1994
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Winter 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight; IT
Corporation
Federal lead/ Fund
financed
PRP lead/State
oversight; Radian
Corporation
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
FTS-886-6552
Lida Tan
312-886-1842
FTS-886-1842
Jim Van der
Kloot
312-353-9309
FTS-353-9309
Kevin Adler
312-886-7078
FTS-886-7078
Susan Webster
214-655-6730
FTS-255-6730
Judith Black
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
Steve Jones
913-551-7755
FTS-276-7755
Bill Bunn
913-551-7792
FTS-276-7792
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
33
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (In situ)
(continued)
April 1992
Region Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant),* MT
(09/Z7/89) See also
Bioremediation (Ex
situ)
Libby Ground Water
Contamination,* MT
(12/30/88)
See also Bioremediation
(Ex situ)
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/31/84); See also
Chemical Treatment
Castle Air Force Base,
OU 1, CA (09/30/91)
Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also Soil Washing;
Bioremediation (Ex
Situ)
Roseville Drums, CA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
03/03/88)
Poly-Carb, NV
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
05/14/87); See also In
Situ Flushing
Specific
Technology
In situ gw
In situ ground
water; Injection of
H202 and Potassium
tripolyphosphate
In situ soil;
preceded by
chemical treatment
In situ ground
water, treated gw
to be reinjected
with nutrients and
H202
In situ soil;
surface application
of nutrients &
electron donors,
recircutate
In situ soi I
In situ soi I,
nutrients plowed
into soil
Site
Description
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Drum storage /
disposal;
Airfield with
buried drums
Federal
facility
Wood
preserving
Midnight dump
on dirt road
Commercial
waste
management
Media
(Quantity)
gw (2 areas, 20
ft deep and 30 ft
deep)
gw (targeting 40
- 80 ft deep)
Soil (3,200 cy)
gw
Soil (110,000 cy,
to a depth of 10
ft)
Soil (14 cy)
Soil (1,500 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Creosote)
VOCs (Benzene),
SVOCs (PCP), PAHS
(Creosote)
Pesticides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
DCE, DCA, Carbon
tetrachloride,
Benzene)
SVOCs (Polychlori-
nated phenols),
Pesticides,
Dioxins
VOCs, SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Phenols)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Operational,
Completion planned
2001; RA started
September 1991
Completed;
Operational 6/85 -
10/85 (see Table 4)
In design
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Completed;
Operational 2/88 to
11/88 (see Table 4)
Completed;
Operational from
7/87 to 8/88 (see
Table 4)
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Woodward- Clyde
Federal lead/
Fund financed
Federal facility,
U.S. Air Force
lead
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal lead/ Fund
F i nanced
Federal lead/Fund
financed; Reidel
Environmental
Services
Contacts/
Phone
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS-585-5414
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS-585-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
FTS-743-2313
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
FTS-484-2288
Michael Work
415-744-2392
FTS-484-2392
Fred Schauffter
415-744-2365
FTS-484-2365
Brad Shipley
415-744-2287
FTS-484-2287
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
FTS-484-2290
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
34
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Chemical Treatment
April 1992
Region
3
4
5
9
9
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Avtex Fibers, VA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
11/14/89)
Palmetto Wood
Preserving,* SC
(09/30/87)
PBM Enterprises (Van
Dusen Airport Service),
HI
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
(04/10/88)
Gila River Indian
Reservation, AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
07/31/84)
See also Bioremediation
(In situ)
Stanford Pesticide #1,
AZ
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
04/20/87)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Chemical treatment
Reduction of Cr(6)
to Cr(3) using Na
metaphosphate
Oxidation with
Sodium Hypochlorite
In situ
In situ
Site
Description
Rayon
manufacturing
facility
waste-water
treatment
Wood
preserving
Si Iver
Recovery
Fac i I i ty
Drum storage /
disposal
Airfield with
buried drums
Pesticide
manufacturing
/ use /
storageFarm
Equipment
Storage
Media
(Quant i ty)
Sludge (39,000
gallons)
Soil (12,700
cy)
Solids
(Cyanide-
tainted x-ray
film chips)
Soil (3,200
cy)
Soil (200)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Carbon Disulfide
Metals (Chromium,
Arsenic, Copper)
Organic Cyanides
Pesticides
(Toxaphene, Ethyl
and Methyl
Parathion)
Pesticides
(Methyl
Parathion)
Status *
Completed in 8/91 (see
Table 4)
Completed; Operational
9/88 to 2/89 (see
Table 4)
Completed; Operational
5/85 to 10/85 (see
Table 4)
Completed; Operational
4/85 to 10/85 (see
Table 4)
Completed; Operational
7/87 to 9/87 (see
Table 4)
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai I able)
Federal lead/Fund
financed; OH
Materials
Federal lead/ Fund
financed; Roy F.
West on
Federal lead/Fund
financed; American
Environmental
Service, Inc.
Federal lead/Fund
f i nanced
Federal lead/Fund
financed; Crosby
and Overton
Contacts/
Phone
Vincent Zenone
215-597-3038
FTS-597-3038
A I Cherry
404-342-7791
FTS-257-7791
Ross Powers
312-378-7661
FTS-378-7661
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
FTS-484-2288
Dan Shane
415-744-2286
FTS-484-2286
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
35
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Dechlorination
April 1992
Region III Site Name, State, (ROD I
Date)
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
6
Re- Solve,* MA
(09/24/87)
See also Thermal
Desorpt i on
Myers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
See also Soil Washing
Signo Trading/Mt.
Vernon, NY
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
12/19/86)
Wide Beach Development,
NY (09/30/85)
Saunders Supply Co,
OU1, VA (09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorpt ion
Smith's Farm Brooks,*
ICY (09/30/91)
Arlington Blending &
Packaging Co., OU1*, TN
(06/28/91)
See also Thermal
Desorpt ion
Fruit I and Drum, NM
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/08/90)
Specific
Technology
Dechlorination of
residuals from
thermal desorption
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
Dechlorination with
APEG
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
Dechlorination of
residuals from
thermal desorption
Dechlorination with
BCD
Site
Description
Chemical
reclamation
facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Waste
Management
Facility
Warehouse
Contaminated
road dust,
driveways,
ditches
Wood
preserving
Drum storage/
disposal
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Operat i on/
maintenance
facility, site
not on NPL
Media
(Quantity)
Soil
(residuals
from 22,500
cy)
Soil (50,000
cy combined).
Sediments
Sludge (15
gallons)
Soil (40,000
cy)
Sludge (700
cy)
Soil (16,000
cy)
Liquid
(Residuals
from thermal
desorption)
Liquids (3
drums of waste
product, 150
gallons)
Key Contaminants 1 Status '
Treated
PCBs
SVOCs
(hexach I orobenzene.
Pesticides (DDT,
DDE, DDD), Dioxins
Dioxins (2,3.7.8-
T COD -Laden
Herbicides)
PCBs
Dioxins (TCDD
equivalents)
PCBs, PAHs
(Carcinogenic)
VOCs (DCE). SVOCs
(PCP), Pesticides
(Chlordane,
heptaclor)
VOCs, Pesticides,
Dioxins (2,4,5,T),
PAHs
Predesign; PD completion
planned Spring 1992;
Treatability study to be
completed Spring 1992;
Design completion planned
Summer 1993
Predesign; PD completion
planned Summer 1992 as
soon as Consent Decree
approved
Completed; Operational
10/20/87 (see Table 4)
Completed; Operational
10/90 to 6/91 (see Table
4)
Predesign, PD completion
planned Spring 1992
In design; Design
completion planned Spring
1992
Predesign, PD completion
planned Winter 1992
In planning stage,
schedule uncertain
Lead Agency and I Contacts/
Treatment III Phone
Contractor (if
(available) |||
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Chemical Waste
Management, Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
financed; Gal son
Research Corp.
(subcontractor
to OHM)
Federal
lead/Fund
financed;
Soil tech Inc.
(subcontractor
to Kimmins)
Federal
lead/Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
f i nanced
Lorenzo Thantu
617-223-5500
FTS-883-1500
John Prince
212-264-1213
FTS-264-1213
Charles
Fitzsimmons
201-321-6608
FTS-340-6608
Herb King
212-264-1129
FTS-264-1129
Andy Palestini
215-597-1286
FTS-597-1286
Tony DeAngelo
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Derek Matory
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Craig Car I ton
214-655-2270
FTS-255-2270
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
36
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Dechlorination
(continued)
April 1992
Region
6
6
7
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Tenth Street
Dump/Junkyard,* OK
(09/27/90)
Sol Lynn/Industrial
Transformers,* TX
(03/25/88)
Crown Plating, MO
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
08/29/89)
Specific 1
Technology
Dechlorination
Dechlorination with
APEG
Dechlorination
Site Media
Description 1 (Quantity)
Salvage and
industrial
waste dump
Transformer
and solvent
recycler
Electroplating
Soil (10,000
cy)
Soil (800 cy),
Sludge ((oil)
400 gallons)
Liquid <5
ga 1 1 ons )
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
PCBs
Pesticides (Si t vex;
2,4,5 TP)
Status *
In design; Remedy is
being Devaluated due to
results of RD, there is
too much debris
Operational; Remedy one
quarter done but being
rethought as the
technology is not
effective for this waste,
soil has a lot of clay
Completed; Operational
10/89 to 12/89 (see Table
4)
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai lable)
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Gal son Research
(sub- contractor
to ENSR
Consulting)
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
Contacts/
Phone
Noel Bennett
214-655-6715
FTS-255-6715
John Meyer
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
Mark Roberts
913-236-3881
FTS-757-3881
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
37
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
In Situ Flushing
Region III site Name, state, (ROD
Date)
2
2
2
2
2
Lipari Landfill,* NJ
(09/30/85)
Naval Air Engineering
Center, OU1, NJ
(02/04/91)
Naval Air Engineering
Center, OU2, NJ
(02/04/91)
Naval Air Engineering
Center, OU4, NJ
(02/04/91)
Vineland Chemical, OU1
and OU2, NJ (09/29/89)
See also Soil Washing
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
Flushing of area
within the slurry
wall, including
soil and wastes
Soil Flushing
(reinject treated
gw through trenches
(winter) & spray
irrigation (summer)
with capture
downgradient)
Soil Flushing
(reinject treated
gw through trenches
(winter) & spray
irrigation (summer)
with capture
downgradient)
Soil Flushing
(reinject treated
gw through trenches
(winter) & spray
irrigation (summer)
with capture
downgradient)
Soil flushing
Flushing lagoons
using treated gw
Site
Description
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal
landfill
Federal
Facility
Federal
Facility
Federal
Facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (650,000
cy, 16 acres
to 15 ft deep)
Soil
(approximately
2 acres, to 4
feet deep)
Soil (2 acres,
to 4 feet
deep)
Soi I (2 acres,
up to 4 feet
deep)
Soil (126,000
cy, to 15 ft
in sandy soi I)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs
(Bis-2-chloro-
ethylether, OCA,
dichloromethane),
SVOCs (Phenol),
Metals (Chromium,
Lead, Nickel,
Mercury)
VOCs
VOCs
VOCs
Metals (Arsenic)
|- I
Operational; Completion
planned 1999
Operational, Completion
planned Sunnier 1995.
Reinjection wi 11
continue for 3 years
and be evaluated.
Being installed, to be
finished Fall 1992.
This technology will be
applied for three years
and evaluated.
Being installed, to be
finished Fall 1992.
This technology will be
applied for three years
and evaluated.
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Lead Agency and III Contacts/
Treatment 1 Phone
Contractor (if
available) III
State lead/Fund
financed;
Bechtel
Environmental,
Inc.
Federal facility
U.S. Navy lead;
Moretrench
Environmental
Federal facility
U.S. Navy lead;
Moretrench
Environmental
Federal facility
U.S. Navy lead;
Moretrench
Environmental
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
Fred Cataneo
212-264-9542
FTS-264-9542
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
FTS-264-6667
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
FTS-264-6667
Jeff Gratz
212-264-6667
FTS-264-6667
Matthew
Westgate
212-264-3406
FTS-264-3406
Steve Hadel
(USAGE -Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
FTS-867-5221
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
38
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
In Situ Flushing
(continued)
Region
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(09/29/89)
L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU1
(Soils),* VA (03/31/88)
See also,
Bioremediation In Situ
U.S. Titanium, VA
(11/21/89)
Ciba-Geigy Corp.
(Macintosh Plant), AL
(09/30/91)
See also Thermal
Desorption
JADCO-Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
See also Soi I Vapor
Extraction
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(06/30/89)
Rasmussen Dump, MI
(03/28/91)
Specific
Technology
Soil flushing
Soil flushing with
surfactants, after
creosote recovery
and before in situ
bioremediation
Dissolution of
wastes (EPA is
considering
excavation and ex
situ dissolution of
wastes)
Soil flushing (to
be evaluated in
treatability study)
Soil flushing
(preceded by vacuum
extraction from
same ports)
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
(flushing part of
reinjection of
treated gw)
Site
Description
Drum storage/
disposal
Wood
preserving
Titanium oxide
production
from ore
digested with
sulfuric acid
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Plastics
manufacturing,
Chemical
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal.
Solvent
recycl ing
Industrial
landfill
Industrial
landfill;
Paint/ink
formation
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (5,200
cy)
Soil (15,000
cy, maximum
depth 8-10
ft)
Soil (16,000
cy, to 25 ft
deep), Solids
(16,000 cy
ferrous
sulfate)
Soil (as
needed,
greater than
20 ft deep)
Soil (6,000
cy)
Soil (64,000
cy, maximum
depth 30 ft)
Soil (quantity
unknown, gw
table at 50
ft)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
TCA), SVOCs
(Methyl Ethyl
Ketone), Metals
(Chromium, Lead)
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote,
Carcinogenic)
Inorganics
(Ferrous Sulfate)
Pesticides
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
chloride, Carbon
tet., Chloroform,
BTX), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene,
Trichlorobenzene)
VOCs (TCE, BTEX)
VOCs (Vinyl
chloride.
Benzene)
Status '
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned Fall
1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign
In design; Design
completion planned Fall
1992; The horizontal
wells used for SVE will
become ports for
f I ush i ng
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1993
In design; Design
completion planned 1994
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Fluor-Daniel
State lead/FUND
financed
Contacts/
Phone
Eduardo
Gonzales
212-264-5714
FTS-264-5714
Eugene Wingert
215-597-1727
FTS-597-1727
Darius
Ostrausuas
215-597-1727
FTS-597-1727
Tim Longe (VA)
804-225-3258
Charles Kane
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Barbara Benoy
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Bruce Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
Bernard Schorle
312-886-4746
FTS-353-6417
Ken Glatz
312-886-1434
FTS-886-1434
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
39
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
In Situ Flushing
(continued)
April 1992
Region
6
7
9
10
10
III II
Site Name, State, (ROD II Specific
Date) III Technology
South Cavalcade
Street,* TX (09/26/88)
See also Soil Washing
Lee Chemical, MO
(03/21/91)
Poly-Carb, NV
Emergency Response
Action Memo signed
(05/14/87)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
Union Pacific Railroad
Sludge Pit, ID
(09/10/91)
United Chrome
Products,* OR
(09/12/86)
Soil flushing with
the same
surfactants used
for the soils
treated with soil
wash i ng
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
followed by In situ
bioremediation
Soil flushing
Soil flushing
Site Media
Description | (Quantity)
1
Wood
preserving
Solvent
manufacturer/
packing
Commercial
waste
management
Railroad
operations,
cleaning, and
fueling
Chrome plating
facility
Soil (20,000
cy)
Soil (from 10
to 20 ft deep)
Soil (1,500
cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
not available)
I Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(a)anthracen
e, Chrysene),
PAHs
VOCs (TCE, DCE,
PCE, TCA)
SVOCs (Phenols),
PAHs (Cresol)
PAHs (Petroleum
Hydrocarbons)
Metals (Chromium)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1994
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Completed; Operational
7/87 to 8/88 (see Table
4)
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1993
Operational; Operations
began Summer 1988
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available) |
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
financed; Reidel
Environmental
Services
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
financed;
CH2MHUI and
subcontractors
Contacts/
Phone
Mark Fite
214-655-6715
FTS-255-6715
Gene Gunn
913-551-7776
FTS- 276- 7776
Jim Kavanaugh
(MO)
314-751-4029
Bob Mandel
415-744-2290
FTS-484-2290
Anne Wil liamson
206-553-2739
FTS-399-2739
Loren
McPhillips
206-553-4903
FTS-399-4903
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
40
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
In Situ Vitrification
April 1992
Region
5
5
8
8
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Ionia City Landfill,*
MI (09/29/89)
Parsons Chemical (ETM
Enterprise), MI
Emergency Response
Rocky Mountain Arsenal,
OU 16, CO (02/26/90)
Uasatch Chemical,* UT
(03/29/91)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
Specific
Technology
In situ
vitrification
In situ
vitrification
In situ
vitrification
In situ
vitrification
Site
Description 1
Municipal
landfill
Agricultural
chemical
facility
Federal
facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage,
Chemical
manufacturing,
Media
(Quantity)
1
Soil with
debris (5,000
cy, to 15 ft
deep)
Soil (2,000 cy)
Soil (4,600 cy,
to 10 ft deep).
Sludge (5,800
cy, to 10 ft
deep)
Soil (3,600 cy
combined, to 5
ft deep).
Sludge, Solids
(drain pipes,
etc.)
Key Contaminants I
Treated
I
VOCs (Methylene
chloride, TCA,
Styrene, Toluene),
Metals (Lead)
Pesticides,
Dioxins, Metals
(Mercury)
Pesticides, Metals
(Arsenic, Mercury)
SVOCs
( Hexach I orobenzene,
PCP), Pesticides,
Dioxins
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1994
Design completed but
not installed,
Completion planned
Summer 1993; Waste has
been staged; Treatment
postponed temporarily
In design; Design
completion planned
1993; On hold pending
reentry of vendor into
the market
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed;
Geosafe Corp.
Federal facility
U.S. Army lead
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Michael
Gifford
312-886-7257
FTS-886-7257
Len Zentack
312-886-4246
FTS-886-4246
Connally Hears
303-293-1528
FTS-330-1528
Bert Garcia
303-293-1526
FTS-330-1526
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
41
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
April 1992
Region
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Keltogg-Deenng Well
Field, CT (09/29/89)
Grove 1 and Wells,* HA
(09/30/88)
Si Iresim,* MA
(09/19/91)
Wells G&H, MA
(09/U/89)
Mottolo Supply, NH
(03/29/91)
South Municipal Water
Supply Well,* NH
(09/27/89)
See also Other
Technologies
Tinkham Garage,* NH
(09/30/86)
Stamina Mills, RI
(09/28/90)
A 0 Polymer, Soi I
Treatment Phase, NJ
(06/28/91 )
Specific Site
Technology Description
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Soi I vapor
extraction (with
air sparging of gw)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction (vapors
to carbon
adsorption)
Solvent
recovery
facility.
Industry
cluster
Manufacturing
Chemical waste
reclamation
Inorganic/
organic
pigments, Drum
storage/
disposal
Uncontrolled
waste site
Solvent
recovery
facility, Ball
bearing
manufacturing
Industrial
landfill. Drum
storage/
disposal
Textile
manufacturing
Polymer
manufacturing
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (19,000
cy to 25 - 30
ft deep)
Soil (137 cy)
Soil (7,400
cy, to 3 ft
deep)
Soil (3,400
cy)
Soil (7,500
cy)
Soil (9,000
cy)
Soil (6,000
cy, to 12 ft
deep)
Soil (7,500
cy, to 30 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE, DCE,
TCA, OCA, Vinyl
Chloride, BTEX)
VOCs (TCE, Methylene
Chloride, DCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA, Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform, Styrene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DCE,
Toluene, Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (PCE, TCA, TCE)
VOCs (Chloroform, DCE,
Vinyl Chloride, Benzene)
VOCs (DCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Trichlorof luoromethane,
Toluene, Ethylbenzene),
SVOCs (Naphthalene,
4-Methylphenol)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Sunnier 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai table)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; GZA
Geoenvi ronmental
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac. Inc.
Still in
negotiations
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Still in
negotiation
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac, Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Still in
negotiation
Contacts/
Phone
Leslie
McVickar
617-573-9689
FTS-833-1689
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
FTS-883-1734
Leslie
McVickar
617-573-9689
FTS-833-1689
Barbara
Newman
617-573-5736
FTS-833-1736
Roger Duuart
617-573-9628
617-833-1628
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
FTS-833-1628
Diana King
617-573-9676
FTS-833-1676
Neil Handler
617-573-9636
FTS-833-1636
Rich Puvogel
212-264-9836
FTS-264-9836
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
42
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
FAA Technical Center,
NJ (09/26/89)
See also Bioremediation
In Situ
Garden State Cleaners,
NJ (09/26/91)
South Jersey Clothing,
NY (09/26/91)
Swope Oil & Chem Co.,
OU2, NJ (09/27/91)
See also Bioremediation
In Situ
Applied Environmental
Services, OU1, NY
(06/24/91)
See also Bioremediation
(In Situ)
Circuitron Corporation,
OU1, NY (03/29/91)
Genzale Plating
Company, OU1, NY
(03/29/91)
Mattiace Petrochemicals
Company, OU1, NY
(06/27/91)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with
bioventing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
(precedes
excavation for
solidification)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site
Description
Jet fuel tank
farm
Dry cleaners
Dry cleaners,
clothing
manufacturer
Chemical
reclamation
Petroleum
reuse
Electroplating
Electroplating
Solvent
recyc I i ng
Organic
chemicals
blending
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (2 acres,
10 to 12 ft
deep)
Soil (200 cy,
to 25 ft deep)
Soil (1/00
cy, to 25 ft
deep)
Soil (2 acres,
to a depth of
80 ft)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (800 sq
ft to a depth
of 30 ft)
Soil (275 cy,
to a depth of
30 ft)
Soil (17,000
cy, to 40 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs, SVOCs
(Chlorophenol, Phenol),
PAHs
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene)
VOCs, SVOCs
VOCs (TCA, PCE, TCE,
DCA)
VOCs (TCE, TCA)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, Benzene,
Xylene)
Status *
Design complete,
going to bid in April
w/contract award in
late summer
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai (able)
Federal Facility
FFA Lead
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed; USAGE
project
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed; USACE
project
Still in
negotiation
PRP lead/State
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
Contacts/
Phone
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
FTS-264-4595
Keith Buch
(FAA)
609-484-6644
Sharon
Acheson
212-264-1217
FTS-264-1217
Sharon
Acheson
212-264-1216
FTS-264-1217
Joseph Cowers
212-264-5386
FTS-264-5386
Andrew
Anglish (NY)
518-457-5637
Hiko Fayon
212-264-4706
FTS-264-4706
Janet
Cappelli
212-264-8679
FTS-264-8679
Edward Als
212-264-0522
FTS-264-0522
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
43
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Reg f on I
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
Site Name, State, (ROD III Specific
Date) Technology
SMS Instruments (Deer
Park), MY (09/29/89)
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Vestal Water Supply
1-1, NY (09/27/90)
Upjohn Manufacturing
Co., PR (09/30/88)
Bendix, PA (09/30/88)
Cryochem, OU3, PA
(09/30/91 )
Henderson Road,* PA
(06/30/88)
Lord-Shope Landfill,*
PA (06/29/90)
Tyson's Dump,* PA
(03/31/88)
Soi I vapor
extraction with
vapors to catalytic
combustor
Soi 1 vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing (treating
unsaturated soi I
and bedrock)
Soi I vapor
extraction (method
to be determined in
design)
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing (system
has been modified
during operations)
Site
Description
Military
aircraft
component
overhauler
Solvent and
chemical
reclamation
facility
2 acres within
industrial
park
Industrial
facility,
chemical leak
Aircraft
instrumenta-
tion manu-
facturing
Machine shops
Injection well
Industrial
landfill
Industrial
landfill
Media
(Quantity)
I
Soil (1,250 cy
to 25 ft deep)
Soil (to 40 ft
deep)
Soil (both
areas = 25,000
cy, to 28 ft
deep)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (33,000
cy, to 10 ft
deep)
Soil (70 cy,
up to 4 ft
deep)
Soil (20,000
sq ft, to 100
ft deep)
Soil (270,000
cy, to 30 ft
deep)
Soil (30,000
cy with some
DNAPL.to 30 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants || Status ' I
I I
VOCs (TCE,
Dichlorobenzene)
VOCs (DCE, TCE)
VOCs (DCA, TCA, TCE,
DCE)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Acetonitrile)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, Vinyl
Chloride)
VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCE,
DCA)
VOCs (DCA, TCA, Toluene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Alcohols,
n-Butanol), SVOCs
(Ketones)
VOCs (Benzene, Toluene,
Xylene), SVOCs
(Trichloropropane)
Being installed;
Completion planned
Spring 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Completed Operational
1984-1988 (see Table
4)
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1992
Operational;
completion date
unknown
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1993
Operational;
completion date
unknown
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/Fund
financed; Four
Seasons
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Area 2 - Fund
lead; Area 4 -
PRP lead
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; RT
Environmental
System
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Terra
Vac
Contacts/
Phone
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
FTS- 264-4706
Lisa Wong
212-264-0276
FTS-264-0276
Ed Als
212-264-0522
FTS-264-0522
Alison Hess
212-264-6040
FTS-264-6040
Humane Zia
215-597-0913
FTS-597-0913
Lisa Nichols
215-597-3216
FTS-597-3216
Michael Towle
215-597-8309
FTS-597-8309
Jim Feeney
215-597-8257
FTS-597-8257
Eugene Dennis
215-597-8555
FTS-597-8555
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
111
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
I
3
4
4
4
4
4
Arrowhead
Associ ates/Scovi I 1 ,
OU1, VA (09/30/91)
Robins AFB, Landfill
and Sludge Lagoon, OU1,
GA (06/28/91)
Charles Macon Lagoon,
OU1, NC (09/30/91)
JADCO- Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
See also In Situ
Flushing
Hinson Chemical, SC
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
11/28/88)
Medley Farm, OU1, SC
(05/29/91)
Specific
Technology
Soi 1 vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction w/air
flushing
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
(followed by in
situ flushing with
same ports)
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction
Site I Media
Description III (Quantity)
II I
Electroplating
Federal
facility,
Sludge from an
industrial
wastewater
treatment
plant
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Plastics
manufacturing,
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
Other
inorganic
chemical
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal
Solvent
recycling
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing,
Rubber
manufacturing,
Drum storage/
disposal
Soil (1,000
cy, depth
unknown)
Soil (15,000
cy, combined,
to 8 ft deep),
Sludge
Soil (1,300
cy) Sludge
Soil (6,000
cy)
Soil (60,000
cy, to 50 ft
deep)
Soil (50,000
cy, maximum
depth 60 ft)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Carbon
Tetrachloride)
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs (Carbon tet..
Chloroform, Vinyl
Chloride, TCE, BTX),
SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene,
T r i ch I orobenzene )
VOCs (OCA, TCE, PCE,
MEK, Benzene, Toluene)
VOCs (OCA, DCE, TCA,
Benzene, Toluene), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
Status '
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall, 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Completed (see Table
4)
Predesign; The design
is planned for
completion in Summer
1993.
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
Facility, U.S.
Air Force lead
PRP lead/ Federal
Oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed, OHM
:orp.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Phil Rotstein
215-597-9023
FTS-597-9023
Roseanne Rudd
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Jack Butler
919-733-2801
Barbara Benoy
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Bruce
Nicholson
(NC)
919-733-2801
Fred Stroud
404-347-3931
FTS-257-4464
Ralph Howard
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Richard
Haynes (SC)
803-734-5487
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
SCRDI Bluff Road, SC
(09/12/90)
Acme Solvent
Reclaiming, Inc., OU2,
IL (12/31/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Enviro. Conservation
and Chemical (ROD
Amendment ) , IN
(06/07/91)
Fisher Calo Chem, IN
(08/07/90)
MIDCO I, IN (06/30/89)
Main Street Well Field,
IN (03/29/91)
Seymour Recycling,* IN
(09/30/87)
See also Bioremediation
In Situ
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soil vapor
extraction (No need
for emissions
treatment)
Site
Description
Drum storage/
disposal,
Solvent
recovery
facility
Industrial
landfill,
solvent
recycling
Industrial
landfill,
solvent
recyling
Solvent
recycling
Industrial
landfill
Water supply
contamination
from many
sources
Chemical waste
management and
incineration
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (45,000
cy, to 12 ft
deep)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (29,500
cy)
Soil (10,000
cy, 4 - 8 feet
deep)
Soil (22,000
cy, to 10 ft
deep)
Soil
(approximately
200,000 cy, 12
acres to 10 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCA,
PCE, OCA, DCE, BTEX),
SVOCs (Chlorobenzene,
Methyl Ethyl Ketone)
VOCs (DCA, TCA, DCE,
TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Benzene)
VOCs (Toluene,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene),
SVOCs (Di Chlorobenzene,
Phenol), Organ ics (BNAs)
VOCs (PCE, DCA, TCA)
VOCs (TCE,
Dichloromethane,
Butanone, BTX), SVOCs
(Chlorobenzene,
Phenols), PAHs
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCA, Carbon tet.,
PCE, TCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Benzene)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1993
Predesign
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1993
Predesign; PRPs have
agreed to conduct
design; Consent
Decree will be
finalized in April
1992.
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992; Consent
Decree is expected in
Fall 1992
Operation to begin in
April 1992;
Completion planned
Spring 1994;
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight; Geo
Syntec
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
financed
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonic
Engineering
(installation),
Geraghty &
Miller
(operation)
Contacts/
Phone
Steve Sandier
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Dennis Dalga
312-886-5116
FTS-886-5116
Karen Vend I
312-886-4739
FTS-886-4739
Brad Bradley
312-886-4742
FTS-886-4742
Richard Bo ice
312-886-4740
FTS-886-4740
Cindy Nolan
312-886-0400
FTS-886-0400
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
FTS-886-6552
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
46
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Wayne Waste
Reclamation, IN
(03/30/90)
Chem Central, MI
(09/30/91)
Kysor Industrial,* MI
(09/29/89)
Springfield Township
Dump, MI (09/29/90)
Sturgis Municipal Well
Field, MI (09/30/91)
ThermoChem, Inc. OU1,
MI (09/30/91)
Verona Well Field
(Thomas Solvent/Raymond
Road),* MI (08/12/85)
Verona Well Field, OU2,
MI (06/28/91)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi I vapor
extraction with air
flushing (may
include biological
enhancement)
Soi I vapor
extraction
(attempted nitrogen
sparging)
Soil vapor
extraction (air
flushing is being
considered)
Site
Description
Municipal
landfills, Oil
reclamation
Chemical
packaging and
distribution
Machine shops,
Truck parts
manufacturing
Industrial
landfill
Municipal
Water Supply
Solvent
recycling
Solvent
recyc I i ng
Machine shops.
Solvent
recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (300,000
cy, 10 acres
to 20 ft deep)
Soil (6,200 cy
to 8 ft deep)
Soil (13,200
cy)
Soil (100,000
cy)
Soil (area and
depth unknown,
< 200 ft deep)
Soil (50,000
cy, 17 ft - 32
ft deep)
Soil (35,000
cy, 1/2 acre
to 18 ft deep)
Soil (30,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, DCE, Vinyl
Chloride, BTEX)
VOCs (DCE, TCE, TCA,
BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene, 2-Methyl
Naphthalene)
VOCs (TCE, Xylene,
Toluene, Ethylbenzene)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,
Butanone, Toluene),
SVOCs (Chlorobenzene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, TCA)
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene)
VOCs (Dichloromethane,
Chloroform, Carbon Tet.,
DCA, TCA, BTEX, Vinyl
Chloride), SVOCs
(Napthalene)
VOCs (PCE, TCA, Toluene)
Status '
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1994
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
1993
Predesign; A schedule
is not included
because EPA is
negotiating with PRPs
Operational;
Completion planned
Spring 1992; Tried
nitrogen sparging to
improve removal above
gw; It increased
removal but at a very
high cost
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1993.
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available) |
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
In negotiations
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed; Terra
Vac, Inc.
(subcontractor
to CH2M Hill)
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
Contacts/
Phone
Tinka Hyde
312-886-9296
FTS-886-9296
Mike McAteer
312-886-4663
FTS-886-4663
Mary L.
Gustafson
312-886-6144
FTS-886-6144
Mary Lou
Martin
312-353-6284
FTS-353-6284
Terese Van
Donsel
312-353-6564
FTS-353-6564
Jae Lee
312-886-4749
FTS-886-4749
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
FTS-886-0399
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
FTS-886-0399
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
47
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION *Y TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region 1 Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
Long Prairie
Groundwater
Contamination, MN
(06/27/88)
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
(06/30/89)
Pristine (Amendment),
OH (03/30/90)
Zanesville Welt Field,
OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil Washing
Hagen Farm, Wl
(09/17/90)
Uausau Groundwater
Contamination, WI
(09/29/89)
South Valley, NM
(09/30/88)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction followed
by GAC for off
gases
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Soi 1 vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Site
Description I
Dry cleaners
Municipal
landfills,
Surface
i mpoundment
Industrial
landfill, Drum
storage/
disposal
Municipal
Water Supply,
Auto parts
manufacturing
Industrial and
municipal
waste disposal
Machine shops,
Bulk chemical
distribution
Aircraft
engine
manufacturing
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (3,600
cy, to 15 ft
deep)
Soil (98,000
cy, combined).
Solids
Soil (quantity
unknown, 4 -
12 ft deep)
Soil (36,000
cy)
Soil (24,000
cy, to 18 ft
deep)
Soil (1,300
cy)
Soil (to 20 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (DCE, PCE, TCE,
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Toluene)
VOCs (Chloroform, DCA,
PCE, TCE, Benzene),
SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (TCE, DCE)
VOCs (Vinyl Chloride,
Butanone,
Tetrahydrofuran, BTEX)
VOCs (TCE, DCE, PCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE,
TCA)
Status '
I
Design completed but
not installed;
Cleanup contract
scheduled for award
shortly
Predesign
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992; EPA is
negotiating with the
PRP; Consent Decree
expected in Fall 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1992; Pilot
test scheduled for
February 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1992
Being installed;
Installation to be
completed Summer 1992
I Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State lead/Fund
financed
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Hydrogeo-Chem
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Hydrogeo-Chem
(subcontractor
to
Cones toga- Rovers
& Associates)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Jan Bartlett
312-886-5438
FTS-886-5438
Cindy
Kahrmann (MN)
612-296-7775
Anthony
Rutter
312-886-8961
FTS-886-8961
Thomas Alcamo
312-886-7278
FTS-886-7278
Dave Wi I son
312-886-1476
FTS-886-1476
Jae Lee
312-886-4749
FTS-886-4749
Don DiGiulio
(RSKERL)
405-332-8800
FTS-743-2011
Margaret
Guerriero
312-886-0399
FTS-886-0399
Bill Luthers
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a tTestability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
48
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
6
6
7
7
7
7
Tinker AFB (Soldier
Creek Bldg. 3001), OK
(08/16/90)
Petro-Chemical Systems,
Inc., OU2, TX
(09/06/91)
See also Other
Technologies
Hastings GW
Contamination (Colorado
Ave),* NE (09/28/88)
Hastings GW
Contamination (Far-Mar
Co.),* NE (09/30/88)
Hastings GW
Contamination, Well No.
3,* NE (09/26/89)
Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (09/28/90)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi 1 vapor
extraction with air
flushing and air
sparging (gw)
Soi I vapor
extraction
(considering heat
enhancement)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Site
Description
Maintenance
facility for
aircraft
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Industrial
metal
finishing/
cleaning
Former grain
storage area
(fumigants)
Former grain
storage area
(fumigants)
Electroplating
galvanized
pipes for
irrigation
systems
Media
(Quantity)
I
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (300,000
cy, to JO ft
deep)
Soil (42,700
cy)
Soil
(targeting
layers at 35
ft and 110 ft)
Soil
(approximately
130,000 cy;
100 ft radius,
up to 110 ft
deep)
Soil
(targeting
soil 25 - 40
ft deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BTEX)
VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene), Metals
(Lead)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE,
TCA)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride, Ethylene
Di bromide)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform)
VOCs (DCA, DCE, TCE,
PCE)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Predesign, PD
completion planned
Fall 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992; EPA is
negotiating the
Consent Decree for
remedial action
Jeing installed;
Installation to be
completed Summer 1992
'redesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992; Consent
Decree not yet
finalized; schedule
is not yet set
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
Facility, Air
Force lead
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed;
Morrison Knudsen
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Susan Webster
2H-655-6730
FTS-255-6730
Capt. Dan
Welch (USAF)
405-734-3058
Chris
Villareal
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
Jarrel
Sommerhauser
913-551-7711
FTS-276-7711
Richard
Schlenker
(NE)
402-471-3388
Susan Hoff
913-551-7786
FTS-276-7786
liane Easley
913-551-7797
FTS-276-7797
Steve Roe
(Morrison
Cnudsen)
303-793-5054
Cecelia Tapla
913-551-7733
FTS-276-7733
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
49
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
7
8
8
8
8
9
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Waver I y Ground water
Contamination, NE
(09/26/90)
Chemical Sales Company,
OU1,* CO (06/27/91)
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
See also Thermal
Desorption
Rocky Mountain Arsenal,
(OU18), CO (02/26/90)
Sand Creek Industrial
(OU1),* CO (09/29/89)
Indian Bend Wash, South
Area, OU1, AZ
(09/12/91)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing (will
recirculate treated
emissions)
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction may vary
technology at
different
faci lities within
area
Site
Description
Grain storage
area
(fumigants)
Chemical sales
and
distribution,
spillage at
tank farm
Aerospace
equipment
manufacturer -
Bulk storage
facility and
industrial
landfill
Federal
facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage,
Refinery
Dry cleaners,
Electroplat-
ing, Indust-
rial landfill,
Municipal
landfills
Media
(Quantity)
Soil
(approximately
200,000 cy; 5
acres, 20 to
30 ft deep)
Soil (360,000
cy, to 35 ft
deep)
Soil (less
than 1 acre,
depth unknown)
Soil (4,000 cy
at 20 ft and
45 ft)
Soil
(>100,000)
Soil (maximum
depth - 90 ft)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride,
Chloroform)
VOCs (PCE, TCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Methylene Chloride,
Chloroform
VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA)
Status '
Operational;
Completion planned
2001; Project began
in February 1988
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Winter 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992; Report
from pilot study due
March, 1992.
In design; Design
completion planned
fall, 1993
Predesign
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal facility
USD A lead
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
State lead under
RCRA
U.S. Army (PRP)
lead
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed; URS
Mixed funding;
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Gene Gunn
913-551-7776
FTS-276-7776
Jim Hallett
(USDA)
202-690-0715
Mary Hansen
(Argonne
National Lab)
708-972-4938
Jim Berkley
303-293-1817
FTS-330-1817
George Dancik
303-293-1506
FTS-330-1506
Susan Chaki
303-331-4832
Connally
Hears
303-293-1528
FTS-330-1528
Erna Acheson
303-294-1719
FTS-330-1719
Jeff Dhont
415-744-2363
FTS-484-2363
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
50
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Mesa Ground Water
Contamination, AZ
(09/30/91)
Motorola 52nd Street,
AZ (09/30/88)
Phoenix- Goodyear
Airport Area (North &
South Fac), AZ
(09/26/89)
Fairchild Semiconductor
(San Jose),* CA
(03/20/89)
Fairchi Id
Semiconductor/MTV- I,*
CA (06/09/89)
Fairchild
Semiconductor/MTV- II,*
CA (06/30/89)
IBM (San Jose),* CA
(12/15/88)
Specific
Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Site
Description
Manufacturing
facility
Defense-
related
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacture
Semiconductor
manufacture
and metal
finisher
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Metal
Finishing
Facility
Computer
manufacture
Media
(Quantity)
Soil
Soil (60 ft
radius to 25
ft depth)
Soil (North
1,200 cy,
South 270,000
cy, 60 ft
deep)
Soil (3,400
cy)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (24,000)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs
VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCE,
Carbon Tetrachloride,
Ethytbenzene)
VOCs (TCE, TCA,, Methyl
ethyl ketone)
VOCs (TCA, Acetone, DCE,
PCE, Xylene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, OCE,
Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DCE,
Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (Xylenes, Acetone,
Freon, Isopropyl
Alcohol, TCA)
Status '
P redesign
In design
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1992
Operational
In design; Design
completion planned
1993
In design; Design
completion planned
1993
Operational;
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Remedy to be
part of RCRA
corrective
action
PRP lead/State
oversight; Dames
and Moore
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Canom'e
Engineering
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight; Terra
Vac
Contacts/
Phone
Hillary Lauer
415-744-2369
FTS-484-2369
Mike
Montgomery
415-744-2394
FTS-484-2394
Jackie Maye
(AZ)
602-257-6899
Craig Cooper
415-744-2370
FTS-484-2370
Helen
McKinley
415-744-2236
FTS-484-2236
Steve Morse
(CA)
415-464-0304
Pattie
Collins
415-744-2229
FTS-484-2229
Pattie
Collins
415-744-2229
FTS-484-2229
Helen
McKinley
415-744-2236
FTS-484-2236
Steve Morse
(CA)
415-464-0304
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
51
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Intel, Mountain View,*
CA (06/09/89)
Intersil /Siemens, CA
(09/27/90)
Monolithic Memories, CA
(09/11/91)
National Semiconductor
and Advanced Micro
Device, CA (09/11/91)
Raytheon, Mountain
View,* CA (06/09/89)
Signetics (Advanced
Micro Devices), CA
(09/11/91)
Solvent Service, CA
(09/27/90)
Specific
Technology
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction
With heat
enhancement
Site
Description
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Metal
Ref inishing
Facility
Aircraft
Maintenance
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing.
Metal
Ref inishing
aircraft
maintenance
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Solvent
recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil
Soil
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (Quantity
unknown)
Soil
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, OCE,
Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs
VOCs
VOCs (PCE, DCE, Toluene,
Xylene, Ethyl benzene),
SVOCs
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DCE,
Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (TCE, DCE, DCA,
TCA)
VOCs (TCA, Acetone,
Ethylbenzene, Xylene),
SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
1993
Operational
P redesign
P redesign
In design; Design
completion planned
1993
Operational; Although
the ROD was signed in
FY 91, the PRP has
operated the remedy
for several years
Operational
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available) ]
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
State lead/ Fund
financed;
Levine-Fricke
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight; M-Con
Associates
State lead under
RCRA
Contacts/
Phone
Pattie
Collins
415-744-2229
FTS-484-2229
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
FTS-484-2234
Steve Morse
(CA)
415-464-0304
Helen
McKinley
415-744-2236
FTS-484-2236
Helen
McKinley
415-744-2236
FTS-484-2236
Pattie
Collins
415-744-2229
FTS-484-2229
Joe Healy
415-744-2231
FTS-484-2231
Ron Jervasom
(CA)
510-464-0688
Steve Morse
(CA)
415-464-0304
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
52
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Vapor Extraction
(continued)
April 1992
Region
9
9
9
9
10
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Spectra Physics, OU1,
CA (03/2Z/91)
Teledyne
Semiconductors, CA
(03/22/91)
Van Waters and Rogers,
CA (09/30/91)
Watkins-Johnson,* CA
(06/29/90)
Commencement Bay/S.
Tacoma Channel/Well
12A,* WA (06/01/87)
Specific
Technology
Soi I vapor
extraction
With horizontal
wells
Soil vapor
extraction with
horizontal wells
Soil vapor
extraction
Soi I vapor
extraction
Soil vapor
extraction with air
flushing
Site
Description
Semiconductor
manufacturing,
Laser
manufacturing
Semiconductor
manufacturing
and lasor
components
Semiconductor
manufacturing
Solvent
recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (100,000
cy to 35 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (DCE, TCA, TCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA)
Status '
Being installed;
Completion planned
winter 1997
Being installed;
Completion planned
Winter 1997
P redesign
In design; Completion
planned Spring 1993
Being installed;
Completion planned
Summer 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight;
Levine-Fricke
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/Fund
financed; AWD
Technologies,
Inc.
Contacts/
Phone
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
FTS-484-2233
Sean Hogan
415-744-2233
FTS-484-2233
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
FTS-484-2234
Elizabeth
Kelcher
415-744-2361
FTS-484-2361
Kevin Rochlin
206-553-2106
FTS-399-2106
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
53
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
Soil Washing
Region
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Ewan Property,* NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Solvent
Extraction
King of Prussia, NJ
(09/28/90)
Myers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
See also Dechlorination
Vineland Chemical, OU1
and OU2, NJ (09/29/89)
See also In Situ
Flushing
American Creosote
Works,* FL (09/28/89)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
Cabot Carbon/Koppers,
FL (09/27/90)
See also,
Bioremediation, Ex
Situ, Bioremediation In
Situ
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
09/30/90)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
Specific
Technology
Soi I washing with
water only
(preceded by
solvent extraction)
Soil washing with
water with washing
agents as additives
Soil washing
preceded by
dechlorination, may
be followed by s/s
Soil washing
Soil washing with
water with
surfactants as
additives (followed
by slurry- phase
bioremediation for
f i nes )
Soil washing
(followed by
bioremediation of
fines)
Soil washing
(separation of
sands followed by
bioremediation of
fines)
Site
Description
1
Industrial
waste dumping
Recyc I i ng
facility
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving;
Pine tar and
turpentine
manufacturing
Wood
preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (22,000
cy)
Soil, Sludge,
Sediments
(20,000 cy,
combined)
Soil, Sludge,
Sediments
(50,000 cy,
combined)
Soil (62,000
cy of sandy
soil)
Soil (36,500
cy)
Soil (6,400
cy)
Solids (8,000
cy of soils,
sludges, and
ki In ash)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Metals (Chromium,
Lead, Copper,
Barium)
Metals (Chromium,
Copper, Silver)
Metals (Aluminum,
Cadmium, Chromium,
Silver, Sodium)
Metals (Arsenic)
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins, PAHs
(Creosote)
SVOCs (PCP,
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
pti thai ate, DNT,
Dimethylphenol),
PAHs, Metals
(Arsenic,
Chromium)
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs
(Creosote)
Status *
P redesign; Stalled by
negotiations and access
problems
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1993
Predesign; po
completion planned
Summer 1992 when CD is
approved
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1992; The design
will be a performance
spec
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1994
Operational; Completion
planned Summer 1993
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available) J
Still in
negotiation
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal lead/Fund
f i nanced
Federal lead/Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal lead/Fund
financed; OHM
Remediation
Services Corp.
Contacts/
Phone
Craig DeBiase
212-264-5393
FTS-264-5393
Gary Adamkiewicz
212-264-7592
FTS-264-7592
John Prince
212-264-1213
FTS-264-1213
Matthew Westgate
212-264-3406
FTS-264-3406
Steve Hade I
(USAGE - Kansas
City)
816-426-5221
FTS-897-5221
Madolyn Streng
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Charles Logan FL
904-488-0190
Kelsey Helton
904-488-0190
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Don Rigger
404-347-3931
FTS-257-3931
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
Soil Washing
(continued)
Region
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving,* NC
(06/30/89)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
United Scrap Lead/SIA,
OH (09/30/88)
Zanesville Well Field,
OH (09/30/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Moss-American,* UI
(09/27/90)
See also,
Bioremediation Ex Situ
Arkwood, AR (09/28/90)
Koppers/Texarkana,* TX
(09/23/88)
South Cavalcade
Street,* TX (09/26/88)
See also In Situ
Flushing
I Specific
Technology
Water with sodium
hydroxide or
hydrochloric acid
to adjust pH as an
additive (followed
by slurry phase bio
and (possible) s/s
for metals)
Acid washing
Soil washing
(preceded by vacuum
extraction)
Soil washing
(followed by slurry
phase bioremdiation
of fines)
Soil washing
(incineration of
residuals)
Water with a
surfactant as an
additive (waste
water to be treated
and discharged)
Water with
surfactants as an
additive (followed
by incineration of
residuals)
Site
Description 1
Wood
preserving
Battery
recycling/
disposal
Municipal
water supply;
Auto parts
manufacturing
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Wood
preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (20,000
cy)
Soil (109,000
cy, combined),
Solids (55,000
cy of battery
casing chips),
Sediments
Soil (1,800
cy)
Soil (80,000
cy)
Soil (20,400
cy>
Soil (19,400
cy)
Soil (11,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Benzene),
PAHs (Creosote),
Metals (Copper,
Chromium, Arsenic)
Metals (Lead)
Metals (Lead,
Mercury)
PAHs
SVOCs (PCP),
Dioxins
PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene)
SVOCs
(Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo( a) anthracene
Chrysene), PAHs
Status *
Design completed but
not installed;
Currently procuring
construction
contractor, Will begin
construction this
summer
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Predesign; PD
completion planned Fall
1992; Consent Decree is
expected in Fall 1992
In design; Design
completion planned 1994
Predesign
Predesign; Soil Washing
project is on hold, EPA
is considering
relocation of the
community
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1994
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal lead/Fund
f i nanced
Federal lead/Fund
financed
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Weston, Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Anita Boseman
312-886-6941
FTS-886-6941
Dave Wi I son
312-886-1476
FTS-886-1476
3etty Lavis
312-886-4784
FTS-886-4784
Rick Erhart
214-655-6582
FTS-255-6582
Ursula Lennox
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
Mark Fite
214-655-6715
FTS-255-6715
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
55
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Soil Washing
(continued)
April 1992
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Specific Site
HI Date) IN Technology I Description
8
9
9
Sand Creek Industrial
OU5,* CO (09/28/90)
FMC (Fresno)*, CA
(06/28/91)
Koppers Company, Inc.
(Oroville Plant), CA
(04/04/90)
See also,
Bioremediation In Situ
Soil washing
(followed by
incineration of
contaminated
residuals)
Soil washing
followed by
solidification/
stabilization
Soil washing
(method to be
determined)
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Wood
preserving
III
Media 1 Key Contaminants
(Quantity) 1 Treated
1
Soil (14,000
cy)
Soil (30,000
cy)
Soil (200,000
cy)
Pesticides, Metals
(Arsenic)
Pesticides (DDT,
EDB, Toxaphene,
Chtordane)
SVOCs
(Polychlorinated
Phenols),
Pesticides,
Dioxins
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1992
P redesign, Design
completion planned Fall
1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1993
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal lead/Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/State
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Erna Acheson
303-294-1971
FTS-330-1971
Tom Dunkelman
415-744-2395
FTS-744-2395
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2365
FTS- 484 -2365
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
56
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
Solvent Extraction
Region
1
1
1
2
4
4
6
6
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Norwood PCBs, MA
(09/29/89)
O'Connor,* ME
(09/27/89)
Pinette's Salvage
Yard,* ME (05/30/89)
Ewan Property,* NJ
(09/29/89)
See also Soil Washing
General Refining,* GA
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
08/13/85)
Carolina Transformer,
NC (08/29/91)
Traband Warehouse, OK
Emergency Response
(Action Memo signed
01/01/88)
United Creosoting,* TX
(09/29/89)
Specific
Technology
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction
(may be followed by
S/S for lead)
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction
(followed by soi I
washing to treat
the inorganics)
Solvent extraction
(oil used as fuel,
solids treated with
s/s)
Solvent extraction
(may be followed by
s/s)
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction
(critical fluid
extraction,
followed by off site
incineration of
fluids)
Site
Description
Industrial
waste dumping
Salvage and
electrical
transformer
recycling
Salvage and
vehicle repair
Industrial
waste dumping
Waste oil
recycling
facility
Transformer
repair
Storage
management
complex
Wood
preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (28,000
cy), Sediments
(3.000 cy)
Soil (23,500
cy, combined),
Sediments
Soil (2,000
cy)
Soil (22,000
cy)
Sludge (2,700
cy), Solids
(700 cy),
Liquids (6,600
gallons waste
oil)
Soil (15,000
cy)
Solids
Soil (with
"tar mats,"
combi ned
volume 67,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE), SVOCs
(Trichlorobenzene),
PCBs, PAHs
PCBs, PAHs, Metals
(Lead)
SVOCs
(Chlorobenzene,
Dichlorobenzene,
Trichlorobenzene),
PCBs
VOCs (PCE, TCE,
TCA, Methylene
chloride, BTX)
PCBs, Metals
(Arsenic, Copper,
Lead)
PCBs
PCBs
VOCs, Dioxins
Status *
Predesign; PD completion
planned Fall 1993
In design; PD completion
planned Spring 1993
Design completed but not
installed; Installation
to begin Fall 1992
Predesign; Stalled by
negotiations and access
problems
Completed; Operational
8/86 - 2/87 (see Table 4)
Predesign; PD completion
planned Fall, 1992
Completed; Operational
2/89 (see Table 4)
In design; Design
completion planned Fall
1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
Still in
negotiation
Federal
lead/Fund
financed;
Resource
Conservation Co.
federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
:ederal
lead/Fund
Financed;
Terra-Clean
State lead/Fund
financed
Contacts/
Phone
Jane Downing
617-573-5708
FTS-833-1708
Ross Gilleland
617-573-5766
FTS-833-1566
Ross Gi lleland
617-573-5766
FTS-833-1566
Craig DeBiase
212-264-5393
FTS-264-5393
Shane
Hitchcock
404-347-3136
FTS-257-3136
(ichael
Townsend
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Pat Hammack
214-655-2270
FTS-255-2270
Deborah
Griswold
214-655-6715
FTS-255-6715
LaReine Pound
(TX)
512-467-7897
Note:
Status as of February 1992.
Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
57
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Thermal Desorption
April 1992
Region
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Cannon Engineering/
Bridgewater, MA
(03/31/88)
Re-Solve,* MA
(09/24/87)
See also Dechlorination
McKin,* ME (07/22/85)
Union Chemical Co.,
OU1, ME (12/27/90)
Ottati & Goss, NH
(01/16/87)
Caldwell Trucking,* NJ
(09/25/86)
Metaltec/Aerosystems,
OU1 - Soil Treatment,
NJ (06/30/86)
Reich Farms, NJ
(09/30/88)
Specific
Technology
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured
w/APC)
Thermal aeration
(followed by
dechlorination of
the residuals)
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured on
carbon)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Thermal aeration
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(carbon adsorption
of vapors)
Thermal desorption
(vapors wi 11 be
captured on carbon)
Site
Description
Chemical waste
storage and
incineration
facility
Chemical
reclamation
facility
Industrial
landfill
Solvent
recycling;
Paint
stripping
Drum storage/
disposal
Unpermitted
septic waste
facility
Metal
manufacturing
Uncontrol led
waste disposal
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (11,000
cy)
Soil (22,500
cy)
Soil (11,500
cy)
Soil (10,000
cy)
Soil (16,000
cy)
Soil (37,000
cy)
Soil (9,000
cy)
Soil (1,120
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, Vinyl
Chloride, Benzene,
Toluene)
PCBs
VOCs (TCE, BTX)
VOCs (TCE, DCE, PCE,
Xylene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, DCA,
Benzene)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, TCA)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, TCA),
SVOCs
Status '
ICompleted
Operational 5/90 to
10/90 (see Table 4)
Predesign;
Treatability study
completion planned
Spring 1992; Design
completion planned
1993
Completed
Operational 7/86 to
2/87 (see Table 4)
In design
Completed
Operational 6/89 to
9/89 (see Table 4)
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1992; Going
to bid in June 1992
Design completed
but not installed;
Installation to
begin Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992; The
design wi 11 begin
after treatabi I ity
studies and be
completed in Winter
1993
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai I able)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canonic
Engineering
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Chemical Waste
Management, Inc.
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Richard
Goehlert
617-573-5742
FTS-833-5742
Lorenzo Thantu
617-223-5500
FTS-883-5500
Sheila Eckman
617-573-5784
FTS-833-1784
Mike Jasinski
617-573-5786
FTS-833-1786
Stephen Calder
617-573-9626
FTS-833-1626
Ed Finnerty
212-264-3555
FTS-264-3555
Ron Rusin
212-264-1873
FTS-264-1873
Natalie Ti llman
(USACE)
816-426-5805
Gary
Adamkiewicz
212-264-7592
FTS-264-7592
* Indicates that a treatabiIity study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
58
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Thermal Desorption
(continued)
April 1992
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
Waldick Aerospace
Devices,* NJ (09/29/87)
American Thermostat, NY
(06/29/90)
Claremont Polychemical,
NY (09/28/90)
Fulton Terminals, Soil
Treatment, NY
(09/29/89)
Sarney Farm, NY
(09/27/90)
Solvent Savers, NY
(09/30/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
GE Wiring Devices, PR
(09/30/88)
U.S.A. Letterkenny SE
Area, OU1, PA
(06/28/91)
Specific
Technology
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(Off site s/s and
disposal of
residuals)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Thermal desorption
(followed by onsite
incineration of
organics)
Thermal desorption
Thermal desorption
(possible prewash
of debris with
surfactants)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(may need s/s for
metals after
thermal desorption)
Site
Description
Manufacture/
electroplating
of plane parts
Thermostat
Manufacturing
Paint/ ink
formation
Former
hazardous
waste storage
faci lity
Industrial
landfill,
Municipal
landfill
Solvent
recovery/
chemical
reclamation
faci lity
Wiring
services
faci I i ty
Munitions
manufacturing/
storage, Drum
storage/
disposal
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (2,000
cy)
Soil (15,000
cy). Sediments
(300 cy)
Soil (1,600
cy)
Soil (4,000
cy)
Soil (2,000 -
8,000 cy)
Soil (60,000
cy)
Soil (5,500
cy, combined),
Solids
(debris)
Soil (8,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE)
VOCs (PCE)
VOCs (TCE, DCE, Benzene,
Xylene)
VOCs (Chloroform, TCE,
PCE, Toluene), SVOCs
(Phthalates)
VOCs (DCE, TCE), PCBs
Metals (Mercury)
VOCs (TCE, Ethylbenzene,
Xylene)
Status '
Design completed;
Bidding underway;
RA contract award
scheduled for May
1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1992
In design; Design
completion planned
Fall 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Summer 1993
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
In design
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
Federal
lead/ Fund
financed
State lead/Fund
financed; USACE
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Federal facility
U.S. Army lead
Contacts/
Phone
William
McFarland
(USACE
Technical)
816-426-5805
Susan Anderson
(USACE
Contracts)
816-426-7424
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
FTS-264-5713
Carlos R. Ramos
212-264-5636
FTS-264-5636
Christos
Tsiamis
212-264-5713
FTS-264-5713
Kevin Willis
212-264-8777
FTS- 264 -8777
Lisa Wong
212-264-0276
FTS-264-0276
Caroline Kwan
212-264-0151
FTS-264-0151
Dennis Orenshaw
215-597-7858
FTS-597-7858
Peg Geiseking
(Letterkenny)
717-267-8483
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
59
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Thermal Desorption
(continued)
April 1992
111 1
Region 111 Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
Saunders Supply Co,
OU1, VA (09/30/91)
Ciba-Geigy Corp.
(Macintosh Plant), AL
(09/30/91)
See also In Situ
Flushing
Aberdeen Pesticide
Dumps, OU4, NC
(09/30/91)
Sangamo/Twelve-Mi le/
Hartwell PCB, OU 1, SC
(12/19/90)
Wamchem,* SC (06/30/88)
Arlington Blending &
Packaging Co., OU1,* TN
(06/28/91)
See also Dechlorination
Acme Solvent
Reclaiming, Inc., OU2,
IL (12/31/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Specific
Technology
I I
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(with carbon
capture of air)
Thermal Desorption
(To be evaluated
during the
treatability study)
Thermal desorption
Thermal desorption
Organic vapors will
be captured on
carbon
Thermal aeration
(vapors captured on
carbon)
Thermal desorption
(the residuals wilt
be dechlorinated)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(followed by s/s
for lead)
Site
Description
Wood
preserving
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage,
Plastics
manufacturing
Tranformer
manufacturer
Former dye
manufacturing
plant
Pesticide
manufacturing/
use/storage.
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Industrial
landfill,
solvent
recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (25,000
cy),
Soil (quantity
unknown)
Soil (124,000
cy)
Soil (100.000
cy)
Soil (2,000
cy)
Soil (24,000
cy)
Soil (6,000 cy
combined),
Sludge
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (PCP), Metals
(Arsenic)
Pesticides
Pesticides (DDT,
Toxaphene, Benzene
Hexachloride)
VOCs, PCBs
VOCs (Benzene, Toluene,
Xylene)
VOCs (DCE), SVOCs (PCP),
Pesticides (Chlordane,
Heptachlor), Metals
(Arsenic)
VOCs (TCA, DCE, DCA,
TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, 4-Methyl 2
Pentanone, Benzene),
SVOCs (Naphthalene),
PCBs
1
Status '
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1992
Predesign
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Spring 1993. A
treatability study
will begin when CD
is lodged and be
complete 240 days
later.
In design; Design
completion planned
Winter 1992; 60%
design expected
shortly
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Winter 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1993
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Federal
lead/ Fund
f i nanced
PRP lead/Fedreal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Andy Palestine
215-597-1286
FTS-597-1286
Charles Kane
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
Kay Crane
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Jack Butler
919-733-2801
Bart Reedy
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Bart Reedy
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Derek Matory
404-347-7791
FTS-257-7791
Dennis Dalga
312-886-5116
FTS-886-5116
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
60
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
April 1992
Thermal Desorption
(continued)
Region
5
5
5
5
8
Site Name, State, (ROD III Specific
Date) III Technology
III
111
Outboard
Marine/Uaukegan Harbor
OU3),* IL (03/31/89)
Anderson Development
(ROD Amendment), HI
(09/30/91)
Carter Industries,* MI
(09/18/91)
University of
Minnesota, MN
(06/11/90)
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(followed by
offsite
incineration of
organics)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(followed by s/s of
solids and
incineration of PCB
oil)
Thermal desorption
(fume incineration
of PCB vapors)
Low temperature
thermal treatment
(followed by
incineration of
vapors and s/s of
soils)
Site
Description I
I
Marine
products
manufacturing
Other organic
chemical
manufacturing
Scrap metal
salvager
University
wastes
Aerospace
equipment
manufacturer -
bulk storage
faci li ty and
industrial
landfill
Media
(Quantity)
I
Soil (16,000
cy, combined),
Natural
Sediments
Soil (3,000 cy
combined).
Sludge
Soil (46,000
cy combined),
Solids
(debris)
Soil (6,300
cy). Solids
(160 cy of
debris)
Soil (2,300
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
Organics (MBOCAs (41
Methylene
Bis-dichloroani line)
PCBs
PCBs
VOCs (TCE), PCBs
Status '
1
Operational;
Completion planned
Summer 1992
Operational;
Completion planned
Spring 1992;
Treatment began
Jan. 5, 1992; In
pilot test, MBOCAs
reduced from 2,800
ppm in sludges to
1.6 ppm
Predesign; A
schedule has not
been set because
EPA is negotiating
with the PRPs
In design; Design
completion planned
Spring 1992; The RA
contract will allow
incineration or
thermal desorption,
provided criteria
are met
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Winter 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Canon ie
Engineering
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
West on Services,
Inc.
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/State
oversight
State lead under
RCRA
Contacts/
Phone
Cindy Nolan
312-886-0400
FTS-886-0400
Jim Hahnenberg
312-353-4213
FTS-353-4213
John Peterson
312-353-1264
FTS-353-1264
Darrell Owens
312-886-7089
FTS-886-7089
David Douglas
(MN)
612-296-7818
George Dancik
303-293-1506
FTS-330-1506
Susan Chaki
(CO)
303-331-4832
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
61
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BT TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Other Technologies
April 1992
Region
1
3
6
Site Name, State, (ROD
Date)
South Municipal Water
Supply Well*, NH
(09/27/89)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
Brodhead Creek, OU1, PA
(03/29/91)
Retro-Chemical Systems,
Inc., OU2, TX
(09/06/91)
See also Soil Vapor
Extraction
I Specific
Technology
Air sparging of
ground water
CROW technology
using hot water
injection to
mobilize coal tar
Air sparging of
ground water
Site
Description
Solvent
recovery
facility Ball
Bearing
Manufacturing
Coal
gasification
Petroleum
refining and
reuse
Media
(Quantity)
gw
Soil (200 cy
up to 40 ft
deep)
gw (to 30 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs, (PCE, TCA,
TCE)
PAHs
VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene),
Metals (Lead)
Status '
In design; Design
completion planned
Sunnier 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Summer 1992
Predesign; PD
completion planned
Fall 1992
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead/Federal
oversight
PRP lead/Federal
oversight;
Remediation
Technologies
PRP lead/ Federal
oversight
Contacts/
Phone
Roger Duwart
617-573-9628
FTS-833-1628
John Banks
215-597-8555
FTS-597-8555
Chris Villareal
214-655-6735
FTS-255-6735
# Status as of February 1992.
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
62
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY INFORMATION ON COMPLETED PROJECTS
Table 4 provides detailed information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment
technologies that have been completed. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in Table 3.
63
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
April 1992
Region
1
1
1
2
I
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation I
Cannon
Eng i neer i ng/Br i dgewater ,
MA
5/90 to 10/90
McKin, ME
7/86 - 2/87
Ottati & Goss, NH
6/89 - 9/89
Wide Beach Development,
NY
9/90 to 9/91
Technology/
Vendor
Thermal soil
aeration/
Canon ie
Environmental
Services
Corp.,
Porter, IN
Thermal
Desorption/
Canonic Env.
Services
Corp. ,
Porter, IN
Thermal
Desorption/
Canon ie
Engineering
APEG
dechlorination
/ Soil Tech
Denver, CO
I
Media Treated
(Quantity) |
Soil (11,300
tons)
Soil
(11,500 cy)
Soil (6,000 cy)
Soil (40,000 cy)
Key Materials
Contaminants (Operating II Handling
Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required |
Criteria: | Continuous | Excavation
0.1 ppm - TCE,
DCE, PCE
0.2 ppm -
Toluene, Xylene
0.5 ppm - Vinyl
Chloride
SVOCs - 3ppm
(total)
Input 500 -
3,000 ppm (Total
VOCs)
Output - <0.025
ppm (Total VOCs)
VOCs Criteria:
.1 ppm TCE
Input:
up to 1,000 ppm
TCE
Output: .1 ppm
TCE, PCE, DCA,
Benzene
Criteria: 1 ppm
- Total VOCs
and
<100 ppb - Each
individual VOC
Output: <1ppm -
Total VOCs
Criteria:
PCB - <10 ppm (1
composite
sample/day)
Input - 10 to
100 ppm PCB
Output - 2 ppm
PCB
operation
40 tons/hr
450 - 500° F
Moisture content
before treatment -
5X - 25% moisture
Additives - dry
soil (to reduce
moisture content)
Cont i nuous
operation
6-8 minutes
retention time
300°F
Batch process
Continuous process
8 tons/hour
200° - 580°C (450°
- 1100°F)
Ambient pH and
moisture
Additives -
Alkaline
polyethylene
glocol (APEG)
Screening
Mixing
Dewatering
Excavation
Excavation
Screening
Excavation
Screening
Staging
I
Residuals
Management |
Residuals from
air pollution
control -
treated on
site, disposed
of off site
Uastewater -
treated on
site, disposed
of off site
Soils •
Solidified and
disposed onsite
Vapors -
Air carbon
capture
Carbon from air
pol lution
control unit
regenerated
off site
Treated soil -
disposed of on
site
Comments
The waste feed size
limitation for the
equipment, 1.875 inches,
was an important
consideration.
More information is
available in the RA report
available from Region 1.
For more information on
this project, see the
close out report available
from Region 1.
If on-site disposal is
planned, perform tests of
the treated material
appropriate to intended
use.
For further information on
this dechlorination
project, see the
Demonstration Test Report
produced by Region 2, EPA.
64
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
Region
2
2
II
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation |
Upjohn Manufacturing
Company, PR
1/83 to 3/88
Signo Trading
International, Inc., NY
10/20/87 - 10/21/87
(Removal)
II
Media Treated
(Quantity) |
Vacuum
extraction
Terra Vac
Corp.
KPEG
dechlorination
Gal son
Remediation,
Syracuse, NY
Soil (16,000 sq
ft to
approximately 100
ft deep)
Sludge (15
gallons)
||
Operating I
Parameters |
Criteria:
Initially:
Undefined, end
point of
treatment was
subject to long
debate.
Final criteria:
Carbon
Tetrarnloride
(in exhaust
stacks) -
nondetectable
for three
consecutive
months
Initial
concentrations -
70 mg/L (carbon
tetrachloride to
air)
Final
concentrations -
nondetect
(<0.002 mg/L)
Dioxin
Input - 135 ppb
Output - 1 ppb
Ambient conditions
Temperature:
150°C
Time: Overnight
Materials
Handling
Required ]
None
Residuals
Management
Discharge of
soi I vapors
through 30- ft
stack
Incineration of
residuals
(without dioxin
contamination)
at treatment,
storage, and
disposal
facility
Comments
For further information on
this application, see the
Applications Analysis
Report for the Terra Vac
In situ Vacuum Extraction
System (EPA/540/A5-
89/003).
65
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
I
Region |
3
4
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Avtex Fibers, VA
4/90 - 8/91
(Removal)
Brown Wood Preserving,
FL
10/88 to 12/91
Technology/
Vendor
Chemical
Treatment
(oxidation
using NaCIO)
OH Materials,
Findlay, OH
(ERCS
Contractor)
Land
Treatment/
Remediation
Technologies,
Seattle,
Washington
I
Media Treated
(Quantity) |
Sludge/water from
storage unit (2
mi I lion gallons)
Soi I /pond
sediment (7,500
cy>
Key
Contaminants
Treated
Carbon Disulfide
Criteria: <10
ppm - Carbon
Disulfide in the
effluent
Input: 50-
200,000 ppm
Carbon disulfide
Output: <10 ppm
Carbon disulfide
Criteria:
100 ppm total
carcinogenic
PAHs as sampled
on 8 subplots on
each lift
Input • 800 to
2,000 ppm total
creosote
contaminants
Output • 10 to
80 ppm total
carcinogenic
indicators
Operating
Parameters
Batch operation
average retention
time • 1 hour
pH - 10
Additives: Sodium
hypochloride.
The retention time
and reagent feed
rates increased
with increasing
concentration of
sludge in the
contaminated
water.
Retention time - 3
to 6 months
Additives - water
and nutrients
Materials
Handling
Requi red
Pumping
Excavation
Screening
Tilling
Residuals
Management
Salts from the
reaction were
removed with
f locculation
and clarifi-
cation at
existing
treatment
plant, pH
adjustment
Treated
material
vegetated with
grass (no cap)
Comments
Carbon disulfide is
unstable and will be found
with other contaminants in
aqueous waste stream.
For additional information
on this project, see the
Removal Close Out Report
available from EPA •
Region III or OH
Materials.
Further information on
this project is available
from the Remedial Action
Close Out Report. The
vendor, RETEC, is expected
to prepare a paper.
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
Region
4
4
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation
Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC
9/28/88 to 2/8/89
General Refining
Company, GA
August-October, 1986
January- February, 1987
(Removal)
I Key
Media Treated III Contaminants
(Quantity) J|| Treated J
Chemical
treatment and
soil washing
Reduction of
hexavalent
chromium to
trivalent
chromium
En- site (ERCS
contractor)
Atlanta, GA
Solvent
extraction/
Resource
Conservation
Technology
Company,
Bellevue, WA
Soil (13,000 cy)
Sludge (3,448
tons)
Health-based
criteria -
Actual
concentrations
unknown
Input:
Arsenic - 2 to
6,200 ppn
Chromium - 4 to
6,200 ppm
Output :
Arsenic - less
than 1 ppm
Chromium - 627
ppm
Input:
PCS - 5.0 ppm
Lead - 10,000
ppm
Output :
PCB -
insignificant
Lead -
concentrated in
solids
Operating
Parameters
Soil - Batch
process
Treatment for
aqueous waste from
soil washing - 25
gallons per minute
pH - 2 to 9
Continuous
operation
Time: 2 hours
pH: 10
Temp: 20°C
Rate: 27 tons/day
Moisture content -
60%
Additives:
Sodium hydroxide
Triethylamine
Materials
Handling
Required
Neutralization
Mixing
Dewatering
Excavation
Screening
Neutralization
Size Reduction
Mixing
Residuals1
Management
Soil -
solidified and
replaced on
site
Wastewater -
permitted
discharge to
the sewer line
Sludges - off
site disposal
Oi 1 - used as
fuel for ki In
Water -
treated,
discharged off
site
Solids -
solidified and
disposed of on
site
Comments
(1) Used sodium meta-
phosphate to lower pH to
2.0 and wash the Chromium
from the soil, (2)
separated the soil and
solution, (3) solidified
the soils, and (4) used
the ferrous ion method of
reduction to precipitate
the chromium from solution
in trivalent form.
This treatment system is
unique in the method of
generating ferrous ion for
the reducing step. The
waste stream passed
through an electrolytic
cell containing consumable
steel electrodes where the
ferrous ions were
electrically introduced
into the waste stream.
The oil recovered from the
extractions process could
not be sold because of an
elevated metals content.
The solvent could not be
recovered due to leaks in
system seals. The unit
required a relatively
uniform material so
materials handling of the
sludges proved difficult
in the beginning of the
project. The lead-bearing
solids produced by the
dryer also required
special handling.
Finally, detergents in the
sludge hindered oil/water
separation.
67
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
Region |
4
5
5
6
III III Ilk I
Site Name, State, Dates Technology/ Media Treated Contaminants
of Operation ||| Vendor ||| (Quantity) ||| Treated |
Hinson Chemical, SC
12/88 - 3/92 (Removal)
Seymour Recycling, IN
Summer - 1990
August-October, 1986
January- February, 1987
PBM Enterprises, Ml
3/25/85 - 10/28/85
(Removal)
Traband Warehouse
PCBs, OK (Removal)
__________________
Soil Vapor
Extraction/ OH
Materials
Atlanta, GA
In situ soil
bioremediation
ABB
Environmental
Services
Neutralization
with
hypochlorite
process
Mid- American
Environmental
Service,
Riverdale, IL
Solvent
Extraction/
Terra Kleen
Soil
(60,000 cy, up to
50 ft deep)
Soil
(12 acres to 10
ft deep,
approximately
43,500 cy)
Fi Im chips (464
tons or 1,280 cy)
Solids
Benzene, TCE,
PCE, DCA, MEK
At completion:
<10 ppm Total
VOCs (In all
samples);
average <1 ppm
Total VOCs
54 contaminants
present,
including TCE,
TCA, and Carbon
Tetrachloride
No standards or
criteria for
this OU in ROD
Cyanide
Input: 200 ppm
Output: 20 ppm
PCBs
Operating
Parameters
In situ;
cont i nuous
operation (except
for occasional
shut downs to
allow soil gas to
reach equi librium
in the pore
spaces)
Additives -
nitrogen,
phosphorus,
potassium, sulfur
(200,000 gallons
of nutrients
added)
Time: 2-3 hours
Additives: sodium
hydroxide
Materials
Handling Residuals
Required ||| Management ||| Comments
Tilling
Agitation
Air emissions
captured on
vapor phase
carbon
No cap needed
Capping in
place
Rinse water,
runoff and
waste
hypochlorite -
treated off
site
Treated chips -
landfilled
(Subtitle D)
_,
The soil became saturated
quickly during this
project, creating surface
pools. The specially
designed tractor got
stuck.
68
-------
TABLE *
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
I
Region ]
I
Site Name, State, Dates
of Operation |
I Key III
Contaminants III Operating
Treated ||| Parameters
1 Materials
Handling III Residuals III
Required ||| Management ||| Comments
I I I I I III
7
7
Crown Plating, MO
10/1/89 to 12/31/89
(Removal)
Scott Lumber, MO
8/87 - Fall, 91
(Removal)
Dechlorination
using the KPEG
process
No vendor,
work done by
EPA
Land Treatment
Liquid (5
gallons)
Soil (16,000 cy>
Criteria:
Dioxin - <1 ppb
Input:
Si 1 vex - 10,000
ppm
Dioxin
equivalents -
24.18 ppb
Output:
Si 1 vex - 32 ppb
Dioxin
equivalents -
0.068 ppb
Criteria:
500 ppm - Total
PAH
14 ppm -
(Jenzo(a)pyrene
Output :
160 ppm Total
PAH
12 ppm
Benzo(a)pyrene
Batch operation
Retention time -
36 hours
(including time of
equi pment
breakdown)
Temperature - 72°C
pH - 13
Moisture content -
100X
Additives:
Water
phosphorous
Tilling
Bui It an on-
site vacuum for
emissions
control
Contaminated
residual oil -
incinerated
off-site
None
69
-------
TABLE 4
COMPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
Region
9
9
9
II
Media Treated
(Quantity) |
Gi la River Indian
Reservation, AZ
3/28/85 - 6/24/85
(Removal)
Gi la River Indian
Reservation, AZ
6/24/85 - 10/23/85
(Removal)
Rosevi lie Drums, CA
2/12/88 - 11/9/88
(Removal)
In situ
chemical
treatment
(followed by
anaerobic bio-
remediation)
No technology
vendor
ERCs
In situ
anaerobic
biological
treatment
(preceded by
chemical
treatment)
No technology
vendor
In situ
Bioremediation
Soil (3,220 cy)
Soil (3,220 cy)
Soil (14 cy)
Key Materials
Contaminants III Operating III Handling
Treated ||| Parameters ||| Required
Input:
Toxaphene -
1,470 ppm
Ethyl para th ion
- 86 ppm
Methyl para th ion
- 24 ppm
Output :
Toxaphene - 470
ppm
Ethyl
parathion - 56
ppm
Methyl parathion
• 3 ppm
Toxaphene
Input: 470 ppm
Output: 180 ppm
Input:
Dichlorobenzene
- 4,000 ppm
Phenol - 12,000
ppm
Output:
Dichlorobenzene
- 140 ppm
Phenol - 6 ppm
pH: 10.2 to 11.8
Moisture: wet
Additives to soil:
sodium hydroxide.
water
pH: 8.3 to 9.8
Additives to soi I :
sulfuric acid,
manure, sludge
Additives to soi I:
manure, water
Tilling
Tilling
I...
Comments
Bioremediation
Capped in place
The biological treatment
would have been more
successful if the
neutralization after the
chemical treatment had
been more complete. The
tearing of the plastic
sheets covering the soils
allowed air in and
prevented anaerobic
activity.
70
-------
TABLE A
COHPLETED PROJECTS
(continued)
April 1992
Region
9
9
Technology/
Vendor
Stanford Pesticide Site
#1, AZ
3/ZO/87 - 11/4/87
(Removal)
Poly-Carb, Inc.. NV
7/22/87 - 8/16/88
(Removal)
Chemical
treatment -
alkaline
hvdrolisis
No technology
vendor
Land treatment
and soi I
flushing
I Key
Contaminants
Treated
Soil (200 cy)
Soil (1,500 cy)
Methyl parathion
Input: 24.2 ppm
Output: 0.05
ppm
Input:
Phenol 1,020 ppm
0-cresol - 100
ppm
m- and p-
cresol - 409 ppm
Output:
Phenol - 1 ppm
0-cresol - 1 ppm
m- and p-
Cresol - 0.92
ppm
I
Operating
Parameters |
pH: 9.0
Moisture: wet
Additives to soil:
soda ash, water,
activated carbon
Additives: water
Materials
Handling
Required
T i 1 1 i ng
(in situ, 3
times per
week)
Excavation
• Placement
in double-
lined pit
Irrigation
• T i 1 1 i ng
Residuals
Management
Leachate
col lection and
treatment with
granular
activated
carbon
Comments
This treatment used both
bioremediation and soil
flushing in one step.
71
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
The table included as Appendix A shows NPL sites where established treatment technologies have been selected as part of the
remedy. Established treatment technologies include: incineration, solidification/stabilization, and others. The sites are ordered by
fiscal year to give some initial information as to the status of implementation; that is, the older the ROD, the more likely that design
and construction have begun.
A-l
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
On-5ite Incineration
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
K 02 Bog Creek Farm NJ
K 02 Bridgeport Rental & Oil NJ
K 05 ACME Solvent IL
85 06 MOT CO TX
86 01 Baird & McGuire MA
86 04 Mowbray Engineering AL
86 05 LaSalle Electrical Utilities IL
86 05 Arrowhead Refinery MN
86 05 Fields Brook OH
86 06 Sikes Disposal Pit TX
87 01 Ottati I Goss NH
87 01 Davit Liquid Waste RI
87 04 Tower Chemical FL
87 04 Geiger/CM Oil SC
87 05 Rose Township Dump MI
87 05 Laskin/Poplar Oil OH
87 06 Bayou Bonfouca LA
87 06 Cleve Reber LA
88 01 Rose Disposal Pit MA
88 02 Lipari Landfill NJ
88 02 Love Canal NY
88 03 Delaware Sand & Gravel DE
88 03 Southern Maryland Wood MD
Treating
88 03 Drake Chemical/Phase III PA
88 03 Ordnance Works Disposal WV
88 04 Zellwood Groundwater FL
88 05 LaSalle Electrical Utilities IL
88 05 Fort Wayne Reduction IN
88 05 Forest Waste Products MI
88 05 Pristine OH
88 05 Summit National Liquid Disposal OH
88 06 Old Midland Products AR
88 06 Brio Refining TX
88 07 Times Beach MO
88 08 Broderick Wood Products CO
89 01 Baird and McGuire MA
89 01 Wells G&H MA
89 02 Bog Creek Farm NJ
89 02 De Rewal Chemical* NJ
89 03 Douglasvilie Disposal PA
89 04 Smith's Farm Brooks* ICY
89 04 Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/ NC
Fairway
89 04 Celanese* NC
89 04 American Creosote Works TN
89 05 Ninth Avenue Dump IN
89 05 New Brighton/Arden Hills MN
' Residuals to be treated with solidification/stabilization.
On-Site Incineration (continued)
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
April 1992
STATE
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
91
91
91
91
FY
84
84
84
85
85
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
05
05
01
02
03
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
07
07
10
03
03
04
05
REGION
05
05
10
02
05
06
08
03
03
05
05
07
02
04
06
Big D Campground
Laskin/Poplar Oil
New Bedford*
Sarney Farm
M.W. Manufacturing*
Sangaroo/Crab Orchard
National Wildlife Refuge
Fisher Calo
Bofors Nobel
Springfield Township Dump*
Pristine (Amendment)
University of Minnesota
Vertac
Texarkana Wood Preserving
Missouri Electric Works
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial
Park)
FMC Yakima Pit
Whitmoyer Labs, Inc. OU3
Eastern Diversified Metals
Ciba Geigy Corp.
Allied Chem & Ironton Coke
Off Site Incineration
SITE NAME
Berlin & Farro Liquid
Incineration
Laskin/Poplar Oi I
Western Processing
Phase I
Swope Oil & Chemical
Byron/ Johnson Salvage
Yard
Triangle Chemical
Woodbury Chemical
Drake Chemical /Phase II
West line
Metamora Landfill
Spiegelberg Landfill
Ellisville Area/Bliss
Williams Property
Sodyeco
Sand Springs Petrochemical
Complex
OH
OH
MA
NY
PA
IL
IN
MI
MI
OH
MN
AR
TX
MO
NE
WA
PA
PA
AL
OH
STATE
MI
OH
WA
NJ
IL
TX
CO
PA
PA
MI
MI
MO
NJ
NC
OK
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
April 199Z
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
88 01 Cannon Engineering/Plymouth MA
88 02 Ewan Property NJ
88 02 Reich Farms NJ
88 02 Brewster Well field NY
88 03 Wildcat Landfill DE
88 03 Berks Sand Pit PA
88 03 Douglassville Disposal PA
88 03 Fike Chemical WV
88 05 Belvidere Municipal IL
Landfill #1
88 06 S. Calvacade St. TX
88 07 Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek MO
(R&S)
88 07 Syntex MO
89 01 W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) MA
89 01 O'Connor ME
89 01 Pinette's Salvage Yard ME
89 02 Claremont Polychemical NY
89 03 M.W. Manufacturing PA
89 03 Whitmoyer Laboratories PA
89 04 Newsom Brothers Old Reichold MS
89 05 cross Brothers Pail IL
89 05 Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor IL
89 05 Wedzeb IN
89 05 Cliff/Don Dump MI
89 05 AI sco Anaconda OH
89 06 United Creosoting TX
89 08 Woodbury Chemical CO
90 01 Beacon Heights Landfill CT
90 01 Kearsarge Metallurgical NH
90 02 FAA Technical Center NJ
90 02 Hooker Chemical-Ruco Polymer NJ
90 02 Sayreville landfill NJ
90 02 Mattiace Petrochemicals NY
90 02 Sealand Restoration Mr
90 03 Greenwood Chemical" VA
90 06 Arkwood AR
90 06 Jacksonville Municipal Landfill AR
90 06 Rogers Road Municipal Landfill AR
90 06 Hardage/Criner (Amendment) OK
90 07 Fairfield Coal Gasification IA
Plant
90 07 Shenandoah Stables MO
90 08 Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
90 08 Sand Creek Industrial CO
90 08 Ogden Defense Depot UT
91 01 Union Chemical ME
91 02 Curcio Scrap Metal NJ
91 02 Swope Oil NJ
91 02 Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc. NJ
Residuals to be treated with solidification/stabilization.
FY
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
FY
82
84
85
85
85
36
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
Off-Site Incineration (continued)
REGION SITE NAME STATE
02 Circuitron NY
02 Mattiace Petrochemical NY
03 Brodhead Creek PA
03 Eastern Diversified Metals PA
03 Dixie Cavern County Landfill VA
04 Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
(Amendment) NC
04 Wrigley Charcoal TN
05 Acme Solvent Reclaiming Inc. IL
05 Main Street Wellfield IN
05 Thermo Chem MI
05 Carter Industries MI
05 Summit National Liquid Disposal
Service (Amendment) OH
06 Petrochemical (Turtle-Bayou) TX
07 Peoples Natural Gas IA
07 Ellisville Area Site HO
07 Ellisville Area (Amendment) MO
07 Kern-Pest Laboratories MO
08 Broderick Wood Products CO
08 Hill AFB UT
09 Advanced Micro Devices Inc. CA
10 Commencement Bay - Nearshore/
Tideflats WA
10 Northwest Transformer - Mission WA
Pole
Solidification/Stabilization
REGION SITE NAME STATE
03 Bruin Lagoon PA
06 Bioecology Systems TX
04 General Refining GA
04 Davie Landfill FL
10 Western Processing/Phase II WA
02 Marathon Battery NY
03 Bruin Lagoon PA
04 Pepper's Steel & Alloy FL
04 Sapp Battery Salvage FL
05 Burrows Sanitation MI
OS Forest Waste Products MI
01 Davis Liquid Waste RI
02 Chemical Control NJ
02 Myers Property NJ
02 Waldick Aerospace NJ
04 Gold Coast FL
04 Geiger/C&M Oil SC
04 Independent Nail SC
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A (continued)
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
April 1992
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
87 04 Palmetto Wood Preserving SC
87 05 Liquid Disposal MI
87 05 Northern Engraving Ul
87 06 Gurley Pit AR
87 06 Mid-South Wood AR
87 06 Cleve Reber LA
87 06 sand Spring Petrochemical OK
Complex
88 01 Charles George Land Reclamation MA
88 02 Love Canat Nr
88 02 Marathon Battery NY
88 02 York Oil NY
88 03 Alladin Plating PA
88 03 Fike Chemical UV
88 04 Brown Wood Preserving FL
88 04 Flowood MS
88 04 Chemtronics NC
88 05 Velsicol Chemical IL
88 05 Mid-State Disposal Landfill UI
88 06 Industrial Waste Control AR
88 06 Bailey Waste Disposal TX
88 06 Brio Refining TX
88 06 French Limited TX
88 07 Midwest Manufacturing/ IA
North Farm
88 09 Selma Pressure Treating CA
88 10 Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling ID
88 10 Gould OR
88 10 Commencement Bay/NTF WA
88 10 Frontier Hard Chrome WA
89 01 SoUivan's Ledge MA
89 01 W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) MA
89 01 O'Connor ME
89 02 DeRewal Chemical NJ
89 02 Marathon Battery NY
89 03 Craig Farm PA
89 03 Douglassville Disposal PA
89 03 Nebetka Auto Salvage Yard PA
89 03 Ordnance Works Disposal WV
89 04 Kassouf-Kimerling Battery FL
89 04 Smith Farm Brooks KY
89 04 Cape Fear Wood Preserving NC
89 04 Celanese NC
89 04 Amnicola Dump TN
89 05 MIDCO I IN
89 05 MIDCO II IN
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY REGION SITE NAME STATE
89 05 Auto Ion Chemicals MI
89 06 Pesses Chemical TX
89 06 Sheridan Disposal Services TX
89 07 Vogel Paint & Wax IA
89 09 Koppers (Oroville Plant) CA
89 09 Purity Oil Sales CA
90 01 New Bedford MA
90 02 Roebling Steel NJ
90 03 M.W. Manufacturing PA
90 03 C&R Battery VA
90 03 Greenwood Chemical VA
90 04 62nd Street Dump FL
90 04 Cabot/Koppers FL
90 04 Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving FL
(Amendment)
90 04 Kassourf-Kimerling Battery FL
Disposal
90 04 Schuylkill Metal FL
90 04 Yellow Wate Road FL
90 04 Zed wood Groundwater FL
Contamination (Amendment)
90 05 Sangamo/Crab Orchard IL
National Wildlife Refuge
90 05 Wayne Waste Oil IN
90 05 Springfield Township Dump MI
90 05 Oconomowoc Electroplating WI
90 06 Jacksonville Municipal Landfill AR
90 06 Rogers Road Municipal Landfill AR
90 07 Shenandoah Stables MO
90 07 Hastings Groundwater Contamination NE
(East Industrial Park)
90 08 Martin Marietta (Denver • CO
Aerospace)
90 08 Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 17) CO
90 09 J.H. Baxter CA
90 10 Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) OR
91 01 Si I resin Chemical MA
91 01 Sullivan's Ledge MA
91 01 Union Chemical MA
91 02 Asbestos Dump NJ
91 02 Nascolite Corp. NJ
91 02 NL Industries NJ
91 02 Roebling Steel NJ
91 02 Waldick Aerospace Services Inc. NJ
91 02 White Chemical Corp. NJ
91 03 Halby Chemical DE
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A Ccontinued)
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
April 1992
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY
REGION
SITE NAME
STATE
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
FY
85
86
87
88
88
89
89
89
89
90
REGION
06
04
03
03
07
09
09
09
09
04
03 Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers MO
03 Eastern Diversified Metals PA
03 Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard PA
03 Whitmoyer Lab (OU3) PA
03 Whitmoyer Lab (OU2) PA
03 U.S.A. Letterkenny SE PA
03 First Piedmont Quarry 719 VA
03 Saunders Supply VA
04 Interstate Lead Co. At
04 USAF Robins Air Force Base GA
04 Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal KY
04 Golden strip Septic Tank SC
04 Aberdeen Pesticide Dump NC
(Amendment)
04 Carolina Transformer NC
04 Arlington Blending and TN
Packaging Co.
04 Oak Ridge 003 TN
04 Wrigley Charcoal TN
OS Acme Solvents IL
05 Carter Industries MI
06 Cimarron Mining Corp. NM
07 IE Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. IA
07 Mid-America Tanning IA
07 Shaw Avenue Dump I A
08 Anaconda Co. Smelter MT
09 FMC (Fresno Plant) CA
09 Valley Wood Preserving CA
Other
SITE NAME STATE TECHNOLOGY
Triangle Chemical TX Soil Aeration
Hollingsworth Solderless FL Soil Aeration
West Virginia Ordnance WV In situ Flamming
Bendix Flight System PA Soil Aeration
Arkansas City Dump KS Chemical
Neutralization
Fa irchi Id Semiconductor/ CA Soil Aeration
MTV- 1
Fairchi Id Semiconductor/ CA Soil Aeration
MTV- 11
Intel, Mountain View CA Soil Aeration
Raytheon, Mountain View CA Soil Aeration
Howe Valley Landfill KY Soil Aeration
A-5
-------
APPENDIX B
REMEDIAL/REMOVAL SITES USING TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Appendix B lists the sites where innovative treatment technologies are used with established or other innovative treatment
technologies in treatment "trains." Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring subsequent treatment,
to prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants within the same
medium.
B-l
-------
APPENDIX B
REMEDIAL/REMOVAL SITES USING TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
April 1992
Che«ical Treatment Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation
Gila River Indian Reservation AZ
Dechlorination Followed by
Soil Washing
Myers Property
NJ
Ex Situ Biorenediation Followed by
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Whitmoyer Laboratories, 00 3 PA
J. H. Baxter CA
In Situ Flushing Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Bioremediation
LA Clarke & Sons
Polycarb (Removal)
VA
NV
Soil Vapor Extraction Followed by
In Situ Bioremediation
In Situ Flushing
Solidification/Stabilization
Soil Washing
Swope Oil & Chemical Co. NJ
JADCO - Hughes NC
Genzale Plating Company, OU 1 NY
Zanesville Well Field OH
Soil Washing Followed by
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Bioremediation
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Solidification/Stabilization
American Creosote FL
Cabot Carbon/Koppers FL
Southeastern Wood Preserving
(Removal) MS
Cape Fear Wood Preserving NC
Moss-American WI
Koppers (Oroville) CA
Arkwood AR
South Cavalcade Street TX
Sand Creek OU 5 CO
FMC (Fresno) CA
Solvent Extraction Followed by
Incineration
Soil Washing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
United Creosoting
Ewan Property
O'Connor
General Refining (Removal)
IX
NJ
ME
GA
Theraal Oesorption Followed by
Dechlorination
Dechlorination
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Incineration of Organic Vapors
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Solidification/Stabilization
Resolve MA
Arlington Blending & Packaging
Co. OU 1 TN
Sarney Farm NY
Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor IL
Carter Industries MI
University of Minnesota MN
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
Waldick Aerospace Devices NJ
USA Letterkenny (SE Area, OU 1) PA
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 2 IL
Carter Industries MI
Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) CO
B-2
-------
April 1992
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES:
SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
EPA/540/2-91/001
Document Request Form
This report is distributed twice a year to Superfund management in U.S. EPA Headquarters and regional offices, pertinent EPA laboratories, states,
EPA libraries, and representatives of other federal agencies. All project contacts listed in the report also receive a copy. If you would like to be
added to or deleted from the mailing list for future reports, please complete the following form and send it to:
U.S. EPA/EPIC
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242-2419
LJ Please add my name to the mailing list: LI Please remove my name and address from the mailing list.
Name
Company ___
Street or P.O. Box
City State Zip
My name is already on the mailing list. Please change the address
FROM: TO:
If you would like copies of this third edition of the "Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual Status Report," call ORD Publications at
513-569-7562 and ask for it by number, EPA 540/2-91/001.
------- |