vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water
Program Operations (WH-547)
Washington DC 20460
September
1983
Innovative and Alternative
Technology Projects:
A Progress Report
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Overview 1
Professional Recognition 3
Program Information 4
Table 1 - Innovative Technology Projects Funded
Through the I/A Technology Program 6
Table 2 - A Summary of Alternative Technology
Projects Funded Through the I/A Program 19
Table 3 - Operating Alternative Technology
Facilities Funded Through the I/A
Technology Program 20
Table 4 - Federal and State I/A Technology
Coordinators and Contacts 27
-------
OVERVIEW
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
(P.L. 92-500) authorized a major federal funding program to
abate water pollution from municipal treatment facilities. The
language of P.L. 92-500 did not define an innovative and
alternative (I/A) program, but it did send a clear message
that use of the federal grant funds authorized by this law
should encourage implementation of alternative technologies.
In reviewing progress toward use of alternative technologies
in 1977, Congress chose specifically to define and authorize
an I/A program in the Clean Water Act (CWA). The language in
this law spelled out and strengthened the Congressional
mandate that federal funds should encourage use of innovations
and alternatives which would conserve and reuse resources.
Specific provisions of the CWA of 1977 established a three-
year test program that included a financial incentive, a
mandatory reserve fund, and the authority to federally fund
correction of failures. The financial incentive came in the
form of a ten percent bonus grant for projects which met
certain criteria. The criteria established two classes of
qualifying projects. Alternative technology projects were
eligible by definition and were named in the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regulations detailing the provisions
of the I/A program. Individual projects or parts of projects
could gain eligibility by being designated as innovative on a
case-by-case basis.
Overall, the I/A reserve for the three-year test program
anticipated increasing participation with time. The reserve
was two percent for the first two years and three percent in
the third year. The fact that the reserve is used to fund the
ten percent difference between a 75 percent and 85 percent
grant means that each percent of set-aside controls about ten
percent of a state's total grant funds. The authority to use
federal funds to correct failures was intended to compensate
for the requirement that the applicant must take a risk to
participate in a program intended to encourage use of rela-
tively unproven or unfamiliar technologies.
The 1981 amendments to the CWA continued and strengthened the
statutory mandate to encourage use of innovative and alterna-
tive technologies. The I/A provisions of the CWA of 1977 were
extended through fiscal year 1985 with changes that increased
the financial incentives and added a provision to fund a new
-------
category of projects designated as field testing. The bonus
grant for I/A projects will become a mandatory 20 percent
bonus in fiscal year 1985. In the interim, the governor of a
state can reduce the federal share for conventional technology
projects and, by so doing, increase the bonus up to the
maximum 20 percent difference. Some states have exercised
this option so that the federal share for their grant appli-
cants is 55 percent for conventional technologies and 75
percent for I/A technologies. The mandatory set-aside was
increased to four percent which means that it has been
increased from two percent in the first year of the program to
four percent or more in the fourth year of the program.
Recognizing a need for flexibility, the Congress provided
states the option to increase the set-aside up to a seven and
one-half percent maximum. The field testing program provides
a mechanism to verify the basis of design for promising
advances in treatment technology to reduce the risk of failure
before funding construction of large projects through the I/A
program.
In summary, there has been a consistent statutory trend from
1972 to the present to direct federal funds to the implementa-
tion of innovations which are promising but unproven for the
proposed use and comparatively unknown alternatives for
wastewater treatment. The increasingly stronger mandates of
Congress have had substantial effects in a comparatively short
time. Response to the I/A program at the local and state
level has resulted in over 2,300 grant awards for I/A technol-
ogies to over 1,200 grant applicants in a little less than
five years. There is every indication that the national
response to the program will encourage the Congress to
continue strong legislative support when it considers further
authorization of the program.
-------
PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
Professional engineering societies such as the American
Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC), the National Society of
Professional Engineers (NSPE), and the Water Pollution Control
Federation (WPCF) continue to recognize I/A projects for their
engineering excellence. Even before the establishment of the
I/A program, projects emphasizing conservation and reuse
gained national recognition. For example, the Muskegon
County, Michigan project was selected as one of the ten
outstanding engineering achievements of 1972 in the United
States by NSPE.
Many projects under the auspices of the I/A program have been
nominated for national recognition. Of the 72 I/A projects
that were completed in 1982, 11 were chosen as finalists by
the officers, member firms, and award committees of the ACEC
in their 1982 Engineering Excellence Awards Program. Award-
winning projects represented a cross section of I/A technol-
ogies. The ACEC grand award winner was the vacuum collector/
land treatment system in Queen Anne's County, Maryland. The
NSPE National Achievement Award Winner was the intrachannel
clarification process proposed for the large Jackson County,
Missouri wastewater treatment plant.
Tours of the Clayton County, Georgia land treatment-water
recycle facility are one of the highlights of the program for
the WPCF Annual Conference in 1983.
-------
PROGRAM INFORMATION
The I/A program is approaching the end of its fifth year.
Parts of the program are reaching stabilty while others are in
a state of transition. The basic provisions of the 1977 law
are quite stable as evidenced by the award of over 2,300
grants to design and/or construct over 1,200 facilities with
innovative or alternative components. Over $225,000,000 of
set-aside funds have been used to provide the ten percent
bonus for eligible components of the projects with a total
construction cost exceeding $3,000,000,000. The effect of
raising the mandatory set-aside to four percent should cause
these figures to increase even more rapidly throughout the
remainder of 1983 and in 1984. Program staff are processing
the first few applications under the provision to provide 100
percent modification and replacement (M/R) funding to correct
failures of innovative or alternative components. The new
field test program established by the 1981 law is in the early
stages of development. With nearly 200 of the l/A-funded
facilities now in operation, it is reassuring that we have
very few requests for 100 percent M/R funding. There is one
field test project already in operation and many other
projects are under consideration.
Recognizing the value of specific project information, the
Office of Water Programs has compiled several tabulations to
provide summary information on the I/A program. Table 1 lists
facilities which include components that meet the criteria to
receive federal grant funds as innovative. This table lists
the type of technology, location, design flow, and consulting
engineering firm. Table 2 is a numerical summary of those
facilities utilizing a defined alternative technology. This
listing is arrayed by EPA region and state to show the
geographic distribution of facilities using these technolo-
gies. The total number of facilities for each technology is
divided to show the number in design or under construction as
well as the number already in operation. Table 3 provides
additional information as to location, size, and the consult-
ing firm for operating facilities using alternative technolo-
gies.
Tables 1 and 3 can be used to make contact with facility
owners or consulting firms to obtain additional information on
the design, construction, and operation of innovative and
alternative technologies. Additional information on the I/A
program and individual projects can be obtained from the
appropriate state or EPA contacts listed in Table 4.
-------
Program staff have worked diligently to make the listings in
these tables as accurate and helpful as possible. Richard E.
Thomas, National I/A Coordinator, who is listed in Table 4,
should be contacted to correct errors or with suggestions to
improve the usefulness of these I/A technology listings.
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
Description of Technology/Grantee
"AERATION"
Counter-Current Aeration
Tuskegee, AL
Boaz, AL
Hlllsborough Co., FL
Troy, NC
E. Richland, SC
Clairborne Co., TN
Portland, TN
Donesboro, TN
Springfield, TN
Dome Diffused
(DBrockton, MA
(DMadison Nine Springs, fl
Meriden, CT
Draft Tube
Atmore, AL
Fairfield, IA
Montgomery, NY
Monticello, NY
Thompson, NY
Submerged Turbine Draft Tube
Cranston, RI
U-Tube
(DGrottoes, VA
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
2.0
4.1
1.5
0.84
0.32
1.0
0.5
3.44
18.0
50.0
11.6
2.0
2.8
0.5
2.5
0.8
23.0
0.2
cost & energy Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc.
Reg. discr. O'Brien & Gere
C. E. Maguire, Inc.
energy
energy
cost
cost
cost
energy
energy
French, Raneker & Assoc.
Ericson, Silva & Assoc.
Ericson, Silva * Clark
Clark, Ericson, Silva
Universal Engineering Corp.
"CLARIFIERS"
Aerated Clarifier
(DChoctaw, OK
Decantor Clarifier
(DGrottoes, VA
Fixed-Media Clarifier
(DWaynesburg, OH
0.5 Reg. discr. Rea Engineering 4 Assoc., Inc.
0.2 energy
0.4 energy
Brennenan Engineers
(Vindicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
6
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Flocculating Clarlfier
Central Valley, UT 50.0 energy
Denmark, WI 0.5 Reg. discr.
(DMadison Nine Springs, WI 50.0 Reg. discr.
Inclined Plate Settler
(2)Sanford, ME 3.6 Reg. discr.
Intra-Channel or Integral Clarifiers
Bismark, MO
Little Blue Valley, MO 1.4
Natchitoches, LA 6.5
Owensboro, KY 6.8
(DSuffern, NY 1.8 cost
Tube Settlers w/Chlorination
(DFlagstaff, AZ 6.0 cost
Brown 4 Caldwell/Koon, King 4 Knowlton
O'Brien 4 Gere
Environmental Engineers, Inc.
cost 4 energy Kleberger 4 Assoc.
cost 4 energy Burns 4 McDonnell
cost 4 energy Beard Engineering, Inc.
Thomas Riddick Assoc.
Brown 4 Caldwell
"COLLECTION SYSTEM"
Collection of Septic Tank Effluent
Kenneth, MN
(DLake Monroe, IN
(DLincoln, MT
0.01 Reg. discr.
0.039 cost
0.11 env. ben.
McCombs-Knutson, Assoc.
Beam, Longest 4 Neff
Stahly Eng. 4 Assoc.
CSO Treatment
Ogdensburg, NY
Peoria, IL
Small Diameter Gravity Collection
(DCrawford, NY
(DWoodstock, NY
6.5
0.15
0.2
cost
cost
cost
cost
Lombardo Associates, Boston
Randolph 4 Assoc.
Philip 3. Clark, Engineers, Inc.
Lombardo Assoc. of Boston
"DISINFECTION"
UV Disinfection
Albert Lea, MN
(2)Cassville, MO
(DChoctaw, OK
Clear Spring, MD
(DCrawford, NY
3.4
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.15
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson 4 Assoc.
Allgier, Martin 4 Assoc.
Reg. discr. Rea Engineers 4 Assoc., Inc.
cost Phillip 3. Clark, Engineers, Inc.
(l)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one Innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Deep River, CT
Dexter, ME
Evanston, WY
(Z)Hesston, KS
Kennebunkport, ME
Knife River, HN
(1)(2)Lamar, AR
(l)Madison Nine Springs, WI
Marietta, OK
Northfield, MN
Pella, IA
Rhinebeck, NY
Smithburg, MD
(DSuffern, NY
Thurnont, MD
(DWaynesburg, OH
(DWoodstock, NY
Ozonation
Hoorhead, MN
Pre-Ozonation
N.E. Ohio, OH
"DISPOSAL OF EFFLUENT"
Deep Well Injection of Effluent
(1)St. Petersburg, FL
Subsurface Filter/Surface Discharge
Lee County, FL
Town of Newport, VT
Water Supply/Aquifer Recharge
(1)E1 Paso, TX
0.088
0.5*
2.9
0.586
-
0.04
0.011
50.0
0.31
2.5
2.28
0.129
0.2
1.8
1.0
0.4
0.2
-
Reg. discr
cost
env. ben.
Reg. discr
-
env. ben.
Reg. discr
Reg. discr
Reg. discr,
Reg. discr
Reg. discr
cost
cost
-
energy
cost
6.0
50.0
Reg. discr.
C. E. Magulre, Inc.
Coffin & Richardson, Inc.
Eckhoff, Watson & Preator
Wilson & Co., Engineers and Architects
Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc.
Burrough, Verling, Braswell, Inc.
O'Brien * Gere
Robert L. McCoy
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk & Assoc.
Veenstran & Klnrn
Brinnier & Larlos
Fellows & Reed
Thomas & Rlddlck
Lombardo Associates, Boston
Watermation, Inc.
Engineering Science
60.5 cost
10.0 cost & energy
0.4- env. ben. Phillips & Ember ley, Inc.
10.0 env. ben. Park Hill, Smith & Cooper, Inc.
"ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY"
Active/Passive Solar Heating
(DHillsborough, NH
0.45
energy
Anderson-Nichols Assoc., Inc.
(DIndlcates that this facility Is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility Is operational.
8
-------
TABLE 1 -- INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Active Solar Heating
City of Newport, VT
Energy Recovery/Heat Pumps
Hastings, NE
(DHillsborough, NH
Hydrogelectric Generating Station
Bonney Lake, WA
Solar Collectors/Energy Conservation
Pine River, MN
Solar Power System
(DWaynesburg, OH
Solar Space Heating
Cornelia, GA
(2)3ackson, WY
Gaffney, SC
Lake Monroe, IN
Supplemental Solar Heating
(DFlagstaff, AZ
Digester Gas Power Generation
(DHenderson, NC
Cullman, AL
Los Angeles, CA
(DRochester, MN
Use Waste Steam from Power Plant
Waukesha, WI
Waste Heat Recovery
North Tulsa, OK
1.2 energy
5.7
energy
2.0 energy
3.0
3.5 energy
3.2
0.039 cost
6.0 energy
19.1
env. ben. &
reliability
energy
energy
11.6 energy
Webster-Martin, Inc.
Henningson, Durham & Richardson
Anderson-Nichols Assoc., Inc.
Phillip M. Botch & Assoc.
0.25 Reg. discr. D. L. Floan
energy
ARIX
Beam, Longest & Neff
Brown & Caldwell
Los Angeles Co. Engineers
Kirkham-Michael & Assoc.
Alvord, Burdic & Howson
30.0 Reg. discr. Black & Veatch/Fell, Brusso, Bruton 4
Knowles
(Vindicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
9
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PR03ECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
"FILTRATION"
Continuous Clean Tertiary Sand Filter
Eveleth, MN
One Cell Lagoon/Dual Sand Filter
Hanover, IL
Hoyleton, IL
Mill Shoals, IL
Prairie du Rocher, IL
St. Elmo, IL
Tanms, IL
Grant Park, IL
Floating Dredge Sand Filter
Green River, WY
Intermittent Sand Filtration
Henderson, NV
Microscreens
Bur ley, ID
Newton, MS
Scottsbluff, NE
Sterling, CO
Recirculating Rock Filter
Contra Costs, CA
Marionville, HO
Seymour, HO
Southwest City, HO
Recirculating Sand Filter
Lane, OR
Hendocino, CA
Miranda, CA
Sadleville, KY
Alton, HO
Mountain View, HO
Slow Rock Filter
(1)West Monroe, LA
1.7
0.1
0.05
0.0*
0.06
0.3
0.08
0.3
2.25
0.77
3.1*
3.88
cost & energy Robert R. Wallace & Assoc.
cost
cost
cost
cost
cost
cost
1.5 Reg. Discr.
5.3
cost 4 energy
Reg. discr.
0.165 energy
0.73 cost
0.2 cost
0.12* cost
0.0**
0.01
0.0*6
0.03
0.1085
5.6
energy
energy
energy
Reg. discr.
Reg. discr.
Fehr, Graham & Assoc.
Watwood A Pyle, Inc.
Henry Meisenhelmer and Gende
3. T. Blankinship & Assoc.
Hurst-Rosche Engineers
Warren and Van Praag
Culp, Wesner, Culp
U.R.S. Engineers
CH2M Hill
Wayne Watts, Engineer
3ohn E. Olsson & Assoc.
ARIX
CDM/KKA Consultants
Hood-Rich
Hood-Rich
Hood-Rich
Kramer, Chin & Mayo
Winzley * Kelly
Crane & Flemming Company
Crane & Flemming Company
(Vindicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
10
-------
TABLE 1 -- INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
"LAGOONS"
Deep Lagoons
(DGrottoes, VA
Facultative Lagoons
Bristol Bay, AK
Holbrook, AZ
Hydrograph Controlled Release Lagoon
Blountsville, AL
(DButler, AL
Canton, MS
Courtland, AL
Folkville, AL
Heidelberg, MS
Linden, AL
Raleigh, MS
Valden, MS
West Monroe, LA
Lagoon in Lieu of Chlorination
Canton, ME
0.2
energy
Brennenan Engineers
0.15 cost 4 energy Tryck, Nyraan 4 Hayes
1.3 energy Dohn Corollo Engineers
0.275
0.5
3.5
0.15
0.27
3.5
0.45
0.2
0.15
5.6
-
energy
-
cost 4 energy
cost
-
-
-
energy
-
0.04 Reg. discr.
Willis Engineers
C. B. Holder 4 Assoc.
Cook-Coggin Engineers
Barth & Assoc.
Woodward & Curran, Inc.
"LAND APPLICATION OF EFFLUENT"
Aquaculture
(DWoodstock, NY
0.2
cost
Lombardo & Assoc.
Duckweed
Paragould, AR
2.2
Reg. discr.
Black 4 Veatch
Overland Flow
Alma, AR
Arcadia, LA
Castor, LA
Cleveland, MS
Corsicana, TX
Esterwood, LA
Forrest Hill, LA
Franklinton, LA
1.27
0.515 env. ben. Balar and Assoc.
0.03 env. ben. S. M. Cothren
3.0 energy Clark Dietz Engineers
1.0 energy Gilbreth 4 Assoc.
0.018 env. ben. Alex Therlot, 3r. 4 Assoc.
0.06 env. ben. Alex Theriot, Or. 4 Assoc.
0.74 env. ben. N-Y 4 Assoc.
(DIndicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROOECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Hall Sunmlt, LA
Heavener, OK
(DLanar, AR
Horse, LA
Oppelo, AR
Vlnton, LA
Wabbaseka, AR
Norwood, LA
0.056 env. ben. Alex Therlot, Or. & Assoc.
0.45 env. ben. Alford Engineering Co.
0.11 env. ben. Burrough, Verling, Braswell, Inc.
0.09 env. ben. Alex Therlot, Or. 4 Assoc.
0.12 env. ben. Affiliated Engineers
1.0 env. ben. Roy F. Weston
0.104 env. ben. Affiliated Engineers
0.035 other US Environmental Planners
Rapid Infiltration
Henderson, NV
Laranle, WY
(DLlncoln, MT
Madison, SD
Waycross, GA
Silviculture
Dalton, GA
Eagle Lake, HE
Eagle Lake, ME
6.5
5.0
0.11
1.8
7.0
cost
cost
env. ben.
cost
40.0 reliability
0.023 env. ben. &
reliability
0.146 env. ben. &
reliability
U.R.S. Engineers
ARIX
Stahly Engineers 4 Assoc.
Banner Assoc., Inc.
Carroll 4 Taylor 4 Assoc.
Carroll 4 Taylor 4 Assoc.
Spray Irrigation
(DButler, AL
Carson City, NV
Dalton, GA
Elko, NV
Hefoer Valley, UT
Hilton Head, SC
(1)St. Petersburg, FL
Wells, NV
Steep Slope Spray Irrigation
Craigsville, VA
Water Hyacinths
Austin, TX
Wilton, AR
0.5
6.8
40.0
2.5
2.5
0.8
60.5
0.27
energy
cost
-
cost
Reg. dlscr
-
cost
cost
0.25
26.0
0.09
env. ben.
energy
env. ben.
Vasey Engineers
Chllton Engineers
Horrocks Engineers
Consultant Engineers' Services, Inc.
Betz, Converse 4 Murdock
Park, Hill, Smith 4 Cooper, Inc.
McClelland Consulting Engs. Inc.
(1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
12
-------
TABLE 1 ~ INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Wetlands
Incline Village, NV
(DNorwalk, IA
Riverside, IA
St. Paul, KS
2.1* cost
0.633 env. ben.
env. ben.
env. ben.
CH2M Hill Engineers
Associate Engineers, Inc.
Shive-Hattery & Assoc.
Shetler, Griffith i Shetlar
"NITRIFICATION"
Fixed Growth Biological Nitrification
Redwood Falls, MN 0.7
Pure Oxygen/Single Stage Nitrification
Indianapolis, IN 125.0
Upflow Packed Bed Nitrification
Upper Eagle Valley, CO
3.2
Reg. discr.
Reg. discr.
cost
Reid, Quebe, Allison Wilcox & Assoc.
MAI Engineers
"NUTRIENT REMOVAL"
Bardenpho
Payson, AZ
Ft. Meyers, FL
Chemical Addition via Motor Boat
Albany, MN
PhoStrip
Amherst, NY
(DBrockton, MA
Reno, NV
(DRochester, MN
Biofilter/Diffused Air TKN Removal
Oakland, ND
Water Valley, MS
Waste Pickle Liquor/P Removal
Baltimore, MD
2.1
24.0
12.0
18.0
30.0
19.1
0.9
cost
cost
Moore Nicklebacker
Rieke-Carroll-Muller & Assoc.
cost Neussbuner, Clark * Velzy
cost & energy Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc.
cost Kennedy, 3enks Engineers
energy Kirkham-Michael & Assoc.
Fridy, Inc.
170.0 Reg. discr.
(l)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one Innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
13
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PR03ECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Basis of
Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Anoxlc/Oxlc System
Chatham, VA
Lancaster, PA
Largo, FL
O.W
30.0?
13.0
"OXIDATION DITCH"
Carrousel Oxidation Ditch
Mount Holly Springs, PA
Draft Tube Oxidation Ditch
Crab Orchard, WV
Eufaula, AL
Foley, AL
Hallstead, PA
Keysvllle, VA
Opellka, AL
Sante Fe, NH
South Hill, VA
Oxidation Ditch
King George County, VA
Smithfleld, VA
Southhampton County, VA
0.3
1.0
2.55
1.0
0.35
0.03
0.9^
6.5
1.0
cost & energy Tracy Engineers
cost & energy May-Helnes & Assoc.
energy
energy
0.05 Reg. dlscr.
0.5 Reg. dlscr.
0.303 Reg. dlscr.
Scanlon & Assoc., Inc.
Gilbert *. Clifnor
R. Kenneth Weeks
Henry T. Sadler
"RBC's"
Hydraullcally Assisted RBC's
Hardlnsburg, KY
Air Driven RBC's
Oakview, CA
Bl-level Structured R8C Plant
Elsah, IL
0.73 energy
1.0 cost & energy Games Montgomery Engineers
0.05 cost
Watwood & Heavener
"SLUDGE TECHNOLOGY"
Thickeners, Belt Filter Presses
(DCape May Co., NO
6.3 Reg. dlscr.
Pandullo, Quirk & Assoc.
(DIndlcates that this facility Is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility Is operational.
14
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PR03ECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGO) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Carver-Greenfield
Los Angeles, CA
Belt Filter Presses With Lime Feed
Ewing-Lawrence, NO
Vacuum Sludge Drying Beds
Gilman, IL
Nevada City, CA
Portage, IN
Union City, IN
Vacuum/Belt Series
Oklahoma City, OK
Disposal
Co-Disposal
ECO-Rock, PA
Facultative Sludge Lagoons
(DFlagstaff, AZ
Odor Control for Sludge Lagoons
Sacramento, CA
Traveling Guns to Land Apply Sludge
Grand Strand, SC
Incineration
Chromium Detoxification of Fluidlzed
Bed Ash
S. Essex, MA
Co-Incineration
Glen Cover, NY
Macon Co., GA
Memphis, TH
Pure Oxygen Fluidized Bed System
Nassau Co., NY
energy
Montgomery & Paterson
18.0 cost & energy Buck Siefort & Jost
0.5
3.5
1.5
Reg. discr.
energy
Reg. discr.
Reg. discr.
40.0 energy
Oerry Lacy & Assoc.
American Engineering
M. W., Inc.
Benham-Blair & Affiliates, Inc.
250.00 env. ben. Greeley & Hansen
6.0 cost & energy Brown & Caldwell
cost & energy Sacramento Area Consultants
6.0 cost
41.0 Reg. discr. Tighe and Bond
8.0 Reg. discr. Wm. F. Cosulick & Assoc./E. F. W. Frank
14.0 cost
80.0 cost & energy
10.0 Reg. discr. Consoer, Townsend & Assoc.
(DIndicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
15
-------
TABLE 1 ~ INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PR03ECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Starved Air Combustion of Sludge
Greensboro, NC
St. Louis, MO
Sludge Composting
Aerated Static Pile Composting
Myrtle Beach, SC
Invessel Mechanical Composting
Brunswick,- GA
New York, NY
Modular Sludge Composting
(DCape May, N3
Sludge Composting
Lexington-Fayette, KY
Jefferson Co., AL
Sludge Digestion
Aerobic Digestion
(DWeiser, ID
Anaerobic Digestion
(DAroostook/Presque Isle, ME
Dual Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion
Hagerstown, MD
(DHenderson, NC
Lackawanna, NY
20.0
167.0 energy
Consoer, Townsend & Assoc.
12.5 env. ben. &
reliability
10.0
280.0 cost
NY City/Compost Systems, Inc
6.3 Reg. discr. Pandullo, Quirk & Assoc.
16.0 env. ben. &
reliability
35.0
2.3 env. ben.
1.3 energy
CH2M Hill
Wright-Pierce, Inc.
8.0 cost & energy Buchart-Horn
4.14 env. ben. 4
reliability
4.5 reliability Neussbuner, Clark & Velzy
"MISCELLANEOUS"
Aerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor
East Bay Dischargers, CA
13.1
(1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
16
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Computerized Financial Management
Passaic Valley, NO
Dissolved Air Flotation
(DWeiser, ID
Earthen Pond System
Quincy, CA
Enclosed Impeller Screw Pumps
Westhorough, MA
Heat Pumps
New York City, NY
Chemical Air Scrubber Odor Control
Western Lake Superior, HN
Powdered Activated Carbon/Regeneration
Bedford Heights, OH
Burlington, NC
(DEI Paso, TX
Kalamazoo, MI
Sauget, IL
Primary Treatment Facility
E. Millinocket, ME
Sequencing Batch Reactor
Crundy Center, IA
Swirl Concentrators
Auburn, IN
Toledo, OH
Teacup Separator for Grit Removal
Omaha, NE
Total Containment Pond
Geralch, NV
cost
Arthur Young & Company
2.3 env. ben. CH2M Hill
0.72 cost A energy John Corollo Engineers
7.68 Reg. discr. SEA Consultants, Inc.
110.0
43.9
2.5
9.5
10.0
53.3
27.0
0.5
1.7
160.0
46.0
0.03
SEA Consultants, Inc.
Reg. discr. Southwest Survey Eng.
Reg. discr.
cost
env. ben.
cost
Reg. discr.
cost
0.83 Reg. discr.
cost
cost
Dalton, Dalton, Little
Park, Hill, Smith A Cooper
Jones A Henry
Russell Axon A Assoc.
Camp, Dresser A McKee, Inc.
Clapsaddle-Garber A Assoc.
Howard, Needles, Tammen A Bergendoff
Jones A Henry
Reg. discr. Camp, Dresser A McKee, Inc.
cost
Walt er § Beyer
(DIndicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
17
-------
TABLE 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PR03ECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (continued)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Tubular Screw Pumps
(DAroostook-Presque Isle, ME
Gardiner, HE
Ft. Meade, FL
Windmill Compressed Air Aeration
Kenan, ID
Wind Turbine Generators
Erie, NY
1.3 energy Wright-Pierce, Inc.
1.8 Reg. dlscr. SEA Consultants, Inc.
1.0
0.218
16.0 cost
Thompson Engineers, Inc.
(1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
18
-------
TABLE 2
A SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH THE I/A PROGRAM
Wastewater
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
State
Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Delaware
Wash., DC
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Pac. Islands
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
TOTAL
Design/Construction
Operational
41
EG 0 >-t
O -H 10
C 4J JS
Pu 3 b tt)
CJ 0 4J K
H C 3 fa -H Ll
3 CU 01 U -H <
3 c Vj fl> O«
IT O -H ^ IB Li
< U Q O So
3
4 3
2 1
1 2
1
1 1
6
10
1
1
17
14 1
23 1
5
18 1
1 1
1 5
6
51 1
3 2
2 5 2 14
1 2
31 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 85 16 18 56
1 56 11 14 35
0 29 5 4 21
Slow Rate
(Irrigation)
1
1
3
2
2
1
6
5
7
5
2
1
8
10
1
6
3
5
3
17
8
4
6
4
2
3
4
3
2
2
16
1
1
6
4
1
160
115
45
Alternative Collec-
tion Systems
4
1
1
4
25
2
4
1
5
3
1
2
2
3
2
5
5
4
4
2
1
9
6
4
2
12
1
4
10
4
2
2
137
111
26
On-Site Treatment
Septage Treatment
2
5
1 10
2 1
5
16
3 2
3
1
1
3 1
3 3
10 1
1
2
2
1
1
1
4 1
1
1
2
52 38
44 35
8 3
Sludge
0
u c C
Ui O 0 O O
C < -H 4J -H
C C O* 10 M 10
oi -H o o o o
C 10 -H (71 -H -H -H
.C>1 (010 *4Qj04Cb
S> fc o* c"*
Q U~l -H (i "D '* *D
dP O r-HU 6 C >i C
&i & to n o i-5 o (J
i
7
214
1
1 63
12 4
1
2 1
2
1
2
2 1
1
1
3
1 1
1
4
1 2
3
1
1
4 12
1
5
2 1 2
1 2
1
1
1
321
1
2
2
64 7 30 8
58 7 26 8
60 40
c
0
10
o
a
3
i
9
1
3
2
4
8
1
1
10
4
11
12
4
6
1
2
12
12
13
4
1
4
3
1
1
3
1
2
3
140
118
22
19
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
State
Containment
A2
AZ
CA
CA
ID
KS
KS
KS
MT
ND
ND
ND
NE
Cqnrounity
KASTEWATER
Ponds
Alpine
Show Low
Eastern
Municipal
Fall River
Mills
Bruneau
Lorraine
McPherson
Salina
Gildford
Kramer
Manna th
Martin
Brainard
Design
Flow
(MGD)
TREATMENT
__
0.8
0.025
7.8
0.023
0.01
0.014
0.009
0.02
Design
Consulting Firm
Ellis, Murphy & Hogate
Johannessen & Gerald/Rod, Gomez
Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc.
Rolls, Anderson & Rolls
Tudor Eng. Co.
Evans, Bierly, Hutch inson &
Assoc.
Wilson & Co.
Wilson & Co.
Wold Engineering
North Central Consultants
Houston Eng.
Johnson, Erickson, O'Brien &
Assoc.
State
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NV
NV
OK
OK
OK
OK
SD
Oommunity
Broadwater
Craig
Edgar
Harvard
Maywood
Overton
Pleasant Dale
Plymouth
Stapleton
Elko-Jackpot
Eureka
Dibble
Fox Rural
Manchester
Mooreland
Lake Norden
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.018
0.03
0.098
0.01
0.032
0.068
0.024
0.045
0.03
0.237
0.05
0.04
0.032
0.02
0.15
Design
Consulting Firm
Baker, Sweeney & Assoc.
Consolidated Engineers
Johnson, Erickson, O'Brien &
Assoc.
Paul Mousel & Assoc.
Great Plains Eng.
Johnson, Erickson, O'Brien &
Assoc.
Johnson, Erickson, O'Brien &
Assoc.
Bruce L. Gilmore & Assoc.
J.V.V. Engineers
Chilton Engineers
Fox & Drechsler
C. H. Guernsey & Co.
Schoell & Matson
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
State
Direct Reuse
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
Overland Flow
AZ
CA
CA
ID
Design
Flow
Community (MGD)
Cambria
El Dorado
Lake County 0.23
Las Virgenes 8.0
Mar in 2.7
Alpine
Davis 5.0
Newman
Santa-Fernwood 0 . 1
Design
Consulting Firm
Boyle Engineering Corp.
Culp/Wesner/Culp
Boyle Engineers
Mar in MWD Engineers
Ellis, Murphy & Itolgate
Brown & Caldwell
Brown & Caldwell
j-U-B-Eng ineers
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
MT
MT
Aquifer Recharge or Rapid Infiltration
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
Pima 30.0
Bishop
Boron 0.21
Brentwood
Gilroy
Black & Veatch
Gram/Phillips Assoc.
BPVv Engineers
CDM/KKA Assoc.
Consoer Townsend & Assoc.
MT
MT
MT
NV
WI
Community
Hilton Creek
ft)l lister
Julian
San Bernardino
Soledad
Sonoma
Whispering
Palms
Woodbridge
Sterling
Bozeman
Corvallis
East Glacier
Plains
Three Forks
Tonopah
Crandon
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.21
0.067
0.24
3.9
5.75
0.051
0.91
0.16
0.45
0.5
0.026
Design
Consulting Firm
Gram/Phillips Assoc.
CSO International, Inc.
County of San Diego
CM Engineering Assoc.
Kennedy/ Jenks Engs.
Brelge & Race
Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc.
Darrhl Dentoni & Assoc.
ARIX
Thomas, Dean & Hoskins
Morrison-Maierle
Kehnlein, Lightower & Johnson
Scruton & Associates
Thomas, Dean & Hoskins
Phillsbury, Dew & Stowell
Donohue & Assoc . , Inc .
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
to
State
Design
Flow
Coinnunity (MGD)
Design
Consulting Firm
Aquifer Recharge or Rapid Infiltration
MI
WY
Slow Rate
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
Hayward 0.68
Jackson 3.5
Infiltration
Perry
Benson
Colorado City
Naco
Amador
Eastern 0.8
Municipal
Kern
Lakeport
Las Virgenes 8.0
Mar in 2.7
Murphys
Nevman
Morgan & Parmley
ARIX
Wn. H. Klingner
Duly, Johns & Assoc.
International Engineers
Duly, Johns & Assoc.
Gretzinger & Weatherby
Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc.
Mason-Vancuren-Jvachoh
Gillett-Harris-Duranceau &
Assoc.
Black & Veatch
Mar in MWD Engineers
Gretzinger & Weatherby
Brown & Caldwell
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
FL
FL
FL
ID
ID
ID
ID
KS
Community
San Bernardino
Scotts Valley
Sierra Vista
Tranquility
Tuolume
Winters
Cortez
Steamboat
Springs
Ueesburgh
Niceville
Tallahassee
Ashton
Mountain Hone
Plummer
Rexburg
Kinsley
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.21
29.0
0.17
3.0
2.0
10.0
0.15
1.95
0.1
1.0
0.24
Design
Consulting Firm
CM Engineering Assoc
Harris & Assoc.
Montgomery & Collins
Harris & Giersch & Gong-Guy
Spray Waste, Inc.
Dewante & Stowell
-
Dismuke & Dismuke
Roy F. Weston
William Bishop, P.E.
James M. Montgomery
Forsgren, Perkins & Assoc.
Wilson & Co.
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
State
Slow Rate
Ml
MI
MI
MI
MN
Comnunity
Infiltration
Fife Lake
Hisperia
Kent City
Nashville
Beaver Bay
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.173
0.075
0.129
0.04
Design
Consulting Firm
Granger Engineering, Inc.
Williams & Works
Williams & Works
Williams & Works
Mateffy Eng. & Assoc.
State
OK
OR
SC
SC
WA
Community
Brownsville
Haines
Holly Hill
S.C. Dept. of
Corrections
Goldendale
Alternative Collection
MT
MT
MT
NC
NC
NC
NE
NM
OK
OK
OK
Corvallis
Eureka
Roberts
Faison
Freemont
Vvaxhaw
Schuyler
Eagle Next
Elroore City
Okarch
Talala
0.05
0.16
0.24
0.17
0.246
0.25
0.7
0.164
0.03
Boney & Newcomb
Settle & Spear
Settle & Spear
McCaleb & Assoc.
AL
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
ID
IN
Dallas Co.
Calistoga
Manila
Mar in
Santa Ynez
South Lake
Tahoe
Ventura-
N. Coast
Avery
Hamilton Lake
Design
Flow Design
(MGD) Consulting Firm
0.3 Kraus & Dalke, P.E.
Anderson-Perry Assoc.
0.188
0.54
0.35 Brown & Caldwell
Systems
0.9 Gcodwyn & Mills
0.2 Montgomery Engineers
Swanson & Oswald
0.071
0.023 David Welch & Assoc., Inc
0.3 C. E. Williams & Assoc.
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
State
Alternative
KY
MD
MD
MI
MI
MN
MO
MS
MS
NC
NC
TN
TX
TX
Community
Collection Systems
Fancy Farms
Queen Annes
Somerset
Michigamme
Rudyard
Township
Knife River
Mokane
Cleary Heights
Granada
Creswell
Waxhaw
Belle Meade
East Cedar
Creek
West Cedar
Creek
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.3
0.8
Design
Consulting Firm
Lenard A. Griggs & Assoc.
O'Brien & Gere Engs., Inc.
State
WA
WA
WI
Community
Black Diamond
Eastsound
Little Black
Design
Flow
(MGD)
0.03
0.08
Design
Consulting Firm
Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc.
C. C. Crane, Inc.
On-Site Treatment
0.042
0.077
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.06
0.064
0.25
0.325
0.683
McNamee, Porter & Seely
McNamee, Porter & Seely
Stewart & Walker, Inc.
Williams & Works
Miller, Wihry & Lee
L. E. Wooten & Assoc.
CA
CA
ME
MI
NH
WA
WA
WI
Taylorsville
Tulane
Isleboro
West Traverse
Weare
Chelan
Eastsound
Little Black
0.045
_- .
0.014
0.006
0.25
0.025
0.08
__
Edward C. Jordan Co., Inc
Williams & Works
Anderson-Nichol s
City of Wenatchee
C. C. Crane, Inc.
Septage Treatment
Barge, Waggener & Assoc.
Johnson Eng. Co.
ID
MI
MI
Avery
Michigamme
West Traverse
0.023
0.042
0.006
David Welch & Assoc., Inc
McNamee, Porter & Seely
Williams & Works
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Selected Operational Facilities
m
State
Comnunity
Design
Flow
(MGD)
Design
Consulting Firm
SLUDGE TREATMENT
90%
Methane
AZ
CA
KS
MI
WA
WI
Composting
ME
ME
ME
NE
Recovery
Flagstaff
Contra Costa
Topeka
Charlotte
Enumclaw
Waukesha
_
20.0
1.2
2.4
11.6
Brown & Caldwell
CDM/KKA Consultants
Van Doren, Hazard & Stall ings
Capital Consultants
Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc.
Alvord, Burdic & Howson
Prior to Land Application
Old Town
Portland
South
Portland
Falls City
5.5
0.52
James W. Souall Co., inc.
Wright-Pierce
Garber & Work
Land Application
CA
CA
IA
East Bay
Las Virgenes
Fairfield
8.0
2.b
Jenks & Harris
Black & Veatch
French, Reneker & Assoc.
State
IL
IL
IL
KA
KA
KA
KA
KA
KA
MI
MT
MT
NE
NE
NC
SD
Community
Casey
Dekalb
Hoopeston
Abilene
Andover
Great Bend
Nickerson
Topeka
Danville
Charlotte
Butte-Silver
Bow
Kalispell
Port Calhoun
Kimball
Tonopah
Brookings
Design
Flow
(MGD)
1.2
7.25
0.8
1.68
0.6
3.64
0.15
20.0
2.7
1.2
2.5
0.106
0.724
0.5
Design
Consulting Firm
Warren & Van Praaf , Inc
Beling Eng. Co.
Warren & Van Praaf, Inc
Wilson & Co.
Poe & Assoc., Inc.
Evans, Bierly, Hutchinson
& Assoc.
Evans, Bierly, Hutchinson
& Assoc.
Capitol Consultants
Dana, Larson, Roubal
John E. Olsson & Assoc.
Phillsbury, Dewante & Stowell
Banner Assoc., Inc.
-------
TABLE 3 - OPERATING ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY FACILITIES
FUNDED THROUGH THE INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Selected Operational Facilities
Deg£gn
Flow Design
State Community (MGD) Consulting Firm
Land Application
VA Elkton 0.4
VT Middlebury 2.2 Wright Engineering
WI Denmark 0.5
to
-------
TABLE 4
FEDERAL AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
US EPA - REGION I
Charles R. Conway
U.S. EPA Water Division
JFK Federal Building, Room 2203
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
(617) 223-0095
(FTS) 223-0095
Connecticut
William Hogan
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection
165 Capital Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06115
(203) 566-2793
Maine
Dennis Purington
Department of Environmental
Protection
Hospital Street
Augusta, Maine 04333
(207) 289-3901
(FTS) 8-868-3901
Massachusetts
Robert Cady
Division of Water Pollution
Control
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Quality
Engineering
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02202
(617) 292-5713
New Hampshire
Robert Cruess
New Hampshire Water Supply and
Pollution Control Commission
P. O. Box 95, Hazen Drive
Concord, New Hampshire 03301
(603) 271-3540
(FTS) 8-842-3540
Rhode Island
Paul Nordstrom
Rhode Island Division of Water
Supply and Pollution Control
75 Davis Street
Providence, Rhode Island 02908
(401) 277-2234
Vermont
Edward Leonard
Environmental Engineering Division
Vermont Agency of Environmental
Conservation
State Office Building
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
(802) 828-3345
(FTS) 8-836-3345
US EPA - REGION II
Jerry Ciotolla
U.S. EPA Water Division (WA-2R)
26 Federal Plaza, Room 1009
New York, New York 10007
(212) 264-1332
(FTS) 264-1332
27
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
New Jersey
Bob Koch
New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection
P. 0. Box CN-029
Trenton, New Jersey 08625
(609) 292-2723
New York
John Marschilok
I/A Processes Section
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road
Albany, New York 12233
(518) 457-3884
Puerto Rico
Jose Bentacourt, Chief
Local Assistance Grants Section
I/A Coordinator
Puerto Rico Environmental
Quality Board
P. O. Box 11488
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00910
(809) 725-5140, ext. 355
Virgin Islands
Francine Lang, Director
Natural Resources Management
Office
Virgin Islands Department of
Conservation and Cultural
Affairs
P. O. Box 4340
Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas,
Virgin Islands 00801
US EPA - REGION III
Lee Murphy
U.S. EPA Water Division
Curtis Building
6th and Walnut Streets
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
(215) 597-9597
(FTS) 597-9597
Delaware
Richard Aurich
Delaware Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental
Control
Division of Environmental Control
Tatnall Building
Dover, Delaware 19901
(302) 736-5081
District of Columbia
Lester Slocum
District of Columbia
Department of Environment
5000 Overlook Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20032
(202) 767-7603
Maryland
John Milnor
Office of Environmental Programs
Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene
201 W. Preston Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
(301) 383-2761
(FTS) 932-2761
28
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
Pennsylvania
Terry Killian
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources
Bureau of Water Quality Management
P. 0. Box 2063
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120
(717) 787-3481
(FTS) 637-3481
Virginia
Alan Pollock
Virginia Water Control Board
P. O. Box 11143
Richmond, Virginia 23230
(804) 257-6333
West Virginia
Michael Johnson
West Virginia Department of
Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
1201 Greenbrier Street
Charleston, West Virginia 25311
(304) 348-0637
US EPA - REGION IV
John Harkins
U.S. EPA Water Division
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
(404) 881-4015
(FTS) 257-4015
Alabama
Rusty Jones
Health Service Administrator
Alabama Water Improvement
Commission
State Office Building
Montgomery, Alabama 36130
(205) 277-3630
Florida
Richard Smith, Chief
Bureau of Wastewater Management
and Grants
Florida Department of
Environmental Regulations
Twin Towers Office
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
(904) 488-8163
Georgia
Bill Martello
Environmental Protection Division
Georgia Department of Natural
Resources
270 Washington Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia
(404) 656-4769
Kentucky
Jud Cramer, Chief
Construction Grants Section
Kentucky Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental
Protection
Century Plaza
1065 U.S. 27 South
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
(502) 564-3410
Mississippi
Mark Smith
Municipal Facilities Branch
Mississippi Department of
Natural Resources
Bureau of Pollution Control
P. 0. Box 10385
Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(601) 961-5131
(FTS) 490-5131
29
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
North Carolina
Allen Wahab, Supervisor
Local Planning Management Unit
Division of Environmental
Management
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
(919) 733-2910
(FTS) 672-2910
South Carolina
Sam Grant, Section Manager
201 Planning
Environmental Quality Control
South Carolina Department of
Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29211
(803) 758-5067
(FTS) 677-5011
Tennessee
Robert G. Threadgill, Jr.
Division of Water Quality Control
Tennessee Department of Public
Health
621 Cordell Hull Building
Nashville, Tennessee 37319
(615) 741-6615
(FTS) 853-6615
US EPA - REGION V
Charles Pycha
U.S. EPA Water Division
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312) 353-2144
(FTS) 353-2144
Illinois
Eugene Seebald, Manager
Division of Water Pollution
Control
Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois 62706
(217) 782-1654
Indiana
Steve W. Kim
Division of Water Pollution
Control
Indiana State Board of Health
1330 West Michigan Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206
(317) 633-0708
Michigan
Brian Myers
Grants Administration Section
Water Quality Division
Michigan Department of Natural
Resources
P. 0. Box 30028
Lansing, Michigan 48909
(517) 374-9075
Minnesota
Lawrence Zdon
Facilities Section
Division of Water Quality
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road, B-2
Roseville, Minnesota 51133
(612) 296-7214
30
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
Ohio
Gregory A. Binder, Director
Division of Public Wastewater
Office of Wastewater Pollution
Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency
P. 0. Box 1049
Columbus, Ohio 43216
(614) 466-8974
Wisconsin
John Melby
Municipal Wastewater Section
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
P. O. Box 7921
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
(608) 267-7666
US EPA - REGION VI
Ancil Jones
U.S. EPA Water Division
First International Building
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75270
(214) 767-9905
(FTS) 729-9905
Arkansas
Martin Roy
Arkansas Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology
8001 National Drive
Little Rock, Arkansas 72209
(501) 562-7444
Louisiana
Tom Griggs
Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources
P. 0. Box 44066
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804
(504) 342-6363
New Mexico
Edward Stokes
New Mexico Environmental
Improvement Agency
Water Quality Section
P. O. Box 968, Crown Building
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
(505) 984-0020, ext. 352
Oklahoma
Dr. H. J. Thung
Oklahoma Department of Health
Environmental Health Services
3400 North Eastern Avenue
P. O. Box 53551
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73152
(405) 271-7346
Texas
Milton Rose
Texas Department of Water
Resources
p. 0. Box 13087
Austin, Texas 78711
(512) 475-3926
US EPA - REGION VII
Mario Nuncio
U.S. EPA Water Division
324 E. 11th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
(816) 374-2725
(FTS) 758-2725
Iowa
Wayne Farrand
Iowa Department of Water, Air
and Waste Management
Henry A. Wallace Building
900 E. Grand
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
(515) 281-8992
31
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
Kansas
Laven Brendan
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Division of Environment
Bureau of Water Quality
Forbes Field
Topeka, Kansas 66620
(913) 862-9360, ext. 240
Missouri
David Cavendar
Missouri Department of Natural
Resources
Program Support Environment
Section
P. 0. Box 1368
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
(314) 751-3241
Nebraska
Theodore Stackley
Nebraska Department of
Environmental Control
Engineering Division
P. O. Box 94877
State House Station
301 Centenniel Mall South
Lincoln, Nebraska 68509
(402) 471-2186
US EPA - REGION VIII
Stan Smith
U.S. EPA Water Division
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 837-2735
(FTS) 327-2735
Colorado
Frank Rozich
Water Quality Control Division
Colorado Department of Health
4210 E. 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
(303) 320-8333
Montana
Joseph Steiner
Water Quality Bureau
Environmental Sciences Division
Cogswell Building
Helena, Montana 59620
(406) 449-2406
North Dakota
Wayne Kern
Division of Water Supply and
Pollution Control
North Dakota Department of Health
Missouri Office Building
1200 Missouri Avenue
Bismarck, North Dakota 58505
(701) 224-4856
South Dakota
Larry Van Hout
South Dakota Department of Water
and Natural Resources
Management
Joe Foss Building
Pierre, South Dakota 57501
(605) 773-3351
32
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
Utah
Wayne Thomas
Utah Bureau of Water Pollution
Control
150 W. North Temple Street
Box 2500
Salt Lake City, Utah 84110
(801) 533-6146
Wyoming
Division
Env ironmental
Mike Hackett
Water Quality
Department of
Quality
Hathaway Building
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
(307) 777-7085
US EPA - REGION IX
Jose T. Caratini (W-2-1)
U.S. EPA Water Management
Division
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
(415) 974-8278
(FTS) 454-8278
Arizona
Ron Frey
Arizona Department of Health
Services
1740 W. Adams
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
(602) 255-1272
California
Betty Meyer
California State Water Resources
Control Board
P. O. Box 100
Sacramento, California 95801
(916) 322-3004
Hawaii
Hiram Young
WTW Construction Grants Program
Hawaii State Department of Health
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, Hawaii 96801
(808) 548-4127
Nevada
James Williams
Nevada Department of Environmental
Protection
201 S. Fall Street
Carson City, Nevada 89710
(702) 885-5870
US EPA - REGION X
Tom Johnson
U.S. EPA Water Division
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 442-1412
(FTS) 399-1412
Alaska
Gene Rehfield
Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation
Division of Water Programs
Pouch O
Juneau, Alaska 99811
(907) 465-2611
33
-------
TABLE 4 (continued)
Idaho
Robert Braum
Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare
Division of Environment
State House
Boise, Idaho 83720
(208) 334-4269
(FTS) 554-4269
Oregon
Robert Evans
Department of Environmental
Quality
P. O. Box 1760
Portland, Oregon 97207
(503) 229-5257
(FTS) 424-5257
Washington
Chris Haynes
Department of Ecology
Office of Water Programs
Olympia, Washington 98504
(206) 459-6101
(FTS) 399-1412
Washington EPA
I/A Technology Contact
Richard Thomas
U.S. EPA (WH-547)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 382-7370
(FTS) 382-7370
Washington EPA
Small Flows Technology Contact
Keith Dearth
U.S. EPA (WH-595)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 382-7266
(FTS) 382-7266
MERL EPA
I/A Technology Contact
Gary Lubin
U.S. EPA MERL
Cincinnati, Ohio
(513) 684-7611
(FTS) 684-7630
45268
R. S. Kerr EPA
I/A Technology Contact
George Keeler
R. S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory
P. O. Box 1198
Ada, Oklahoma 74820
(405) 332-8800
(FTS) 743-2212
34
------- |