CHRONIC NEUROLOGICAL SEQUELAE

                   OF ACUTE ORGANOPHOSPHATE

                     PESTICIDE POISONING:


                    AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY


                         Final Report
           Eldon P. Savage, Ph.D.., Project Director
   Thomas J. Keefe, Ph.D./ Director of Statistical Services
     Lawrence M. Mounce, B.S., Field Studies Coordinator
            Epidemiologic Pesticide Studies Center
           Institute of Rural Environmental Health
                  Colorado State University
                Fort Collins, Colorado  80523


              James A. Lewis, M.D., Neurologist
        Robert K. Beaton, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist
           Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry
            University of Colorado Medical Center
                   Denver, Colorado  80220


      Leland H. Parks, Ph.D., Assistant Project Director
      Epidemiologic Studies Program, School of Medicine
        Texas Tech University Health Services Centers
                   San Benito, Texas  78586


                         April  1982


The information in this document has been funded wholly or
in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
under contract 68-01-4663 to Colorado State University.  It
has been subjected to the Agency's publications review process
and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.   Mention
of trade names or commercial products does not constitute  endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.

-------
                            TABLE  OF CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
LIST OF TABLES	iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	   vi
INTRODUCTION	    1
MATERIALS AND METHODS	  .    3
  Case Participants 	    3
  Selection of Matched Pair Control Participants	    5
  Participant Interview 	    6
  Quality Control Assurances	    6
  Comprehensive Examination Protocol	    7
  Pesticide Residue and Cholinesterase Testing	    7
  Physical Examinations 	    7
  Neurological Evaluation	,	    8
  Electroencephalographic Examination 	    8
  Neuropsychological Testing	    9
  Statistical Analysis	    15
RESULTS	   17
  Demographic Data	   17
  Acute  Organophosphate Pesticide Poisoning Histories 	   29
  Physical  Examination and  Clinical Laboratory  Data	   30
  Clinical  Laboratory Results	   33
  Neurological  Data	   33
  Neuropsychological  Findings  	   50
  Blood  Pesticide Residues  and ChE Assays	   58
SUMMARY  AND DISCUSSION	   66
REFERENCES	   74

-------
                            LIST  OF TABLES


Table                                                                 Page

  1     Occupations  of organophosphate  pesticide  poisoning cases  ...   18

  2     Age means  and  standard  deviations  (S.D.)  of all  study
        participants .........................   19

  3     Mean Hollingshead  social class  and standard deviation  (S.D.)
        of case  and  control  participants  ...............   20

  4     Age and  Hollingshead social  position scales for  study
        participants by matched pairs .................   21

  5     Elapsed  time in days from  last  poisoning  to neuropsychologi-
        cal examination .................... •.  .  .  .   29

  6     Organophosphate pesticides implicated in  the primary poisoning
        incidents ...........................   31

  7     Summary  of abnormal  conditions  identified in participants
        during physical examination  .................   32

  8     Summary  of the statistical comparison of  the cases and controls
        with respect to selected laboratory  test  variables  ......   34

  9     Summary  of the results  of  the encephalogram (EEG) evaluation
        of case  and control  participants  ...............   35

 10     Summary  of the statistical comparison of  the cases and controls
        with respect to mental  status,  cranial nerves, and motor
        system ............................   37

 11     Evaluation of case and  control  participants with respect to
        the summary and components of the mental  status category of the
        neurological examination ...................   38

 12     Evaluation of case and  control  participants with respect to
        the state  of consciousness and  mood  from  the mental  status
        category of the neurological examination  ...........   40

 13     Evaluation of case and  control  participants with respect to
        the cranial  nerve category summary evaluation of the neuro-
        logical  examination ......................  40

 14     Evaluation of case and  control  participants with respect to
        the knee jerk (right and left combined) test of the neuro-
        logical  examination ......................  41
 15     Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to
        the ankle jerk (right and left combined) test of the neuro-
        logical examination
                                  iii

-------
                      LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table                                                                  Page

 16     Evaluation of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  motor system score  test  of the  neurological
        examination	     41

 17     Summary of  the statistical  comparison  of the cases  and
        controls with  respect to the  sensory system	     42

 18     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  pin  upper right  extremity test  of the neurological
        examination	     43

 19     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  pin  upper left extremity test of the  neurological
        examination	     43

 20     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  pin  lower right  extremity test  of the neurological
        examination	     44

 21     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  pin  lower left extremity test of the  neurological
        examination	     44

 22     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  vibration, right test of the neurological  examina-
        tion 	     45

 23     Evaluation  of  case  and  control  participants  with  respect
        to the  vibration, left  test of the neurological examina-
        tion 	     45

 24     Summary evaluation  of case and  control participants with
        respect to  the sensory  system of the neurological examina-
        tion 	     46

 25     Summary of the statistical comparison  of the cases and
        controls with  respect to integrative function and other
        miscellaneous  examinations 	     47

 26     Evaluation  of case  and  control  participants with respect
        to the finger-nose  right test of the neurological examina-
        tion 	     48

 27     Evaluation  of case  and  control  participants  with respect
        to the  finger-nose  left test of the neurological  examina-
        tion 	     48

 28     Summary evaluation  of case and  control participants with
        respect to  the integrative function of the neurological
        examination	     49
                                   IV

-------
                        LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)


Table                                                                  Page

 29     Summary evaluation of case and  control  participants with
        respect to other miscellaneous  exams of the neurological
        examination	    49

 30     Psychological  test score means, standard error of the
        difference of means, and the probability level  of the
        analysis of variance test for the  case-control  comparison
        for the Halstead-Reitan Battery and  the WAJS Battery ....    51

 31     Psychological  test score means, standard error of the
        difference of means, and the probability level  of the
        analysis of variance test for the  case-control  comparison
        for the Peabody and Individual  Achievement Test and Added
        Ability Tests	    52

 32     Psychological  test score means, standard error of the
        difference of means, and the probability level  of the
        analysis of variance test for the  case-control  comparison
        for the MMPI Battery	    53

 33     Patient's assessment of own functioning:  Test score means,
        pooled estimate of the standard error (S.E.) of each mean,
        and probability level of the analysis of variance test for
        the case-control comparison	    56

 34     Relative's assessment of patient's functioning:  Test score
        means, pooled estimate of the standard error (S.E.) of each
        mean, and probability level of  the analysis of variance test
        for the case-control comparison	    59

 35     Analysis of variance summary with  subgroup means and
        standard deviations for the total  organochlorine pesticide
        residue in the blood	    62

 36     Analysis of variance summary with  subgroup means and
        standard deviations for red blood  cell  cholinesterase. ...    64

 37     Analysis of variance summary with  subgroup means and
        standard deviations for plasma  cholinesterase	    65

-------
INTRODUCTION
   LJhe increased use of organophosphate  (OP)  pesticides in the last three
decades has  been accompanied by numerous acute  organophosphate poisonings.
The World Health Organization (WHO)  has stated  that the  problem of acute
pesticide poisonings is extensive and serious and  may number as many as
500,000 cases annually throughout the world (1)J  In the United States, a
national study of hospitalized pesticide  poisoning cases from  1971 through
                             • *
1973 resulted in an estimated 8241 admissions of which 31%  were due  to
organophosphate pesticides.  Of these, over 70% of the organophosphate
pesticide poisonings were due to occupational exposure (2).
     The OP pesticides are cholinesterase inhibitors.  In the  poisoned
individual cholinergic synapses cannot degrade  the transmitter, acetylcholine,
released during normal function.  This condition leads to excitation,
followed by paralysis, of the extensive peripheral and central  cholinergic
nervous system.  Symptoms in patients experiencing OP poisonings  include
flushing, salivation,  fasciculations,  tremors,  restlessness, agitation, ataxia,
weakness, convulsions and coma; these symptoms develop immediately after
exposure.  Once the cholinergic imbalance has been corrected the neurological
signs and symptoms usually disappear completely (3).
     In acute OP poisonings plasma and/or red blood cell (RBC) cholinesterase
activity is depressed.   Plasma depression may last from one to three weeks
while depression of RBC  acetylcholinesterase may persist for as long as 12
weeks.  If  the  treatment of acute organophosphate poisoning cases is inade-
quate,  a delayed but  invariably transient syndrome with similar features
may appear  (4).
     It has been shown in animal studies that the OP  anticholinergic com-
pound,  tri-o-cresyl phosphate  (TOCP), can produce chronic  and progressive

-------
 degeneration of lower motor neurons (5).  Bidstrup et al. have suggested that
 the OP pesticides could produce a similar effect (6).  The presence of long-
 term neuropsychiatric disturbances in humans following acute exposure to OP
 compounds has been reported by Gershon, Shaw and others  (7,8).  Drenth noted
 a high percentage of electromyogram (EMG) abnormalities among workers in OP
 production plants (9).  Abnormal electroencephalograms (EEGs), similar to
 those obtained  from epileptic patients, have been observed by several investi-
 gators in individuals following acute pesticide intoxications (10,11).  Met-
 calf and Holmes  (12) described less dramatic abnormalities in the EEGs after
 recovery from acute poisoning.  Duffy et al. (13) suggested that the persis-
 tence of known  short-term OP effects, when taken in conjunction with the
 reported long-term behavioral effects of OP exposure, provide parallel evi-
 dence that human exposure to OP compounds can culminate in brain function
 alterations.
      In  spite of the number of investigators who have reported the above
 findings,  a  number of other scientists have disagreed with these conclusions
 (14,15).   An  epidemiologic analysis of patients following acute OP intoxica-
 tions  did  not reveal  increased incidence of psychiatric disorders (16).
 Tabershaw  and Cooper found no "serious sequela of high incidence" in patients
 reported as having "occupational disease attributed to organic pesticides"
 (17).  Clark, in an extensive literature review of experimental animal
 studies, was unable to find consistent evidence supporting the hypotheses
 that exposure to OP pesticides may result in abnormal behavior (18).
     Many of these clinical studies have not included epidemiologic design.
For example, they have not  included one  or more of the following:   matched
                                -2-

-------
controls, complete documentation of acute exposures, sufficient quantitative
measures of neurologic and behavioral  functioning, and complete statistical
analyses.  The major objective of this epidemiologic study which was designed
to overcome many of the aforementioned shortcomings, was to determine the
chronic adverse health  effects,  if any, following an acute organophosphate
poisoning.'
     This study was a cooperative effort of the following institutions:  the
Epidemiologic Pesticide Studies Center of the Institute of Rural Environmental
Health of Colorado State University (Colorado Center) in Fort Collins, Colorado
the Epidemiologic Studies Program, Texas Tech University School of Medicine
(Texas Program) in Lubbock, Texas; and the Departments of Neurology and Psy-
chiatry, University of Colorado Medical Center (UCMC) in Denver, Colorado.
The Colorado Center served as coordinator on the project.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
     The study population consisted of 100 individuals (cases) who had
previously experienced acute poisoning from OP pesticide exposures.  Each
case was carefully matched by age, sex, race, occupation, and educational
level to a control participant.  Participants in the control cohort had not
experienced organophosphate poisonings.  The study was specifically designed
to detect any chronic neurological or neuropsychological effects in the case
participants.
     Case Participants.  A roster of potential case  participants was compiled
from various health data records available in Colorado and Texas.  The
Colorado roster consisted of approximately 443 organophosphate  pesticide
poisoning cases, all of which occurred from 1950  through  1976.  Holmes (19),
and Savage, et al. (20) and other investigators have reported on a number
of pesticide poisoning cases that occurred in Colorado.   Gallaher  (21) and
Hatcher and Wiseman (22) and other investigators  have reported  on  poisoning
                                  -3-

-------
cases from the Rio Grande Valley in  Texas.   The  potential  case  participant
roster in Texas consisted of about 400 individuals who had experienced
acute pesticide exposures from 1960  through  1976.   After screening
both the Colorado and Texas rosters  for completeness of poisonings  documenta-
tion, a revised roster of approximately 303  potential OP poisoned participants
was developed, and exhaustive attempts were  made to locate all  of the potential
participants.   Of the 303 potential  participants,  a total  of 200 (approximately
66%) were located.
     The potential participants were carefully screened for acceptance.   The
screening process criteria included:  1) a documented history of at least
one OP poisoning; 2) diagnosis by a  physician including symptoms consistent
with OP poisoning; 3} a minimum age  of 16 years  at the time of follow-up
contact; and 4) an understanding of  the English  language sufficient to
complete the neuropsychological test.  Participants were excluded if they
had any of the following in their medical histories:  1) organophosphate
poisonings within three months prior to testing; 2) diseases or injuries
to the central nervous system including periods  of unconsciousness totaling
more than 15 minutes; 3) congenital  defects  of the central nervous system;
or 4) alcohol, drug, or narcotic abuse.
     Of the 200 potential participants that  were located, a total of 12 (6%)
were deceased; 47 persons (23.5%) did not meet the screening process criteria;
and 27 (13.5%) declined to participate in the study.  The remaining 114
potential case participants agreed to participate in the study.  Of these, a
total of 100 case participants completed the study.  Examination scheduling
difficulties such as great travel distances  and  conflicting work requirements
prevented 14 cases from participating during the time period of the study.
                                  -4-

-------
     Selection of Matched Pair Control Participants.  Control participants
were selected and matched to corresponding case participants with respect to
age, sex, race, level of education, occupational class, social position,
and ethnic background.  Controls were identically matched for sex and race,
and in the case of Mexican Americans, for ethnic background.  Age was
matched to within one year for participant ages 16 through 20; two years
for ages 21-23; three years for ages 24-25; and five years for ages 26
through 70.  The age matching criteria were established to be compatible
with normal performance curves on the neuropsychological test battery.
Persons younger than 15 were excluded from the study because the adult
neuropsychological test battery is not appropriate for them, and persons
older than 70 were excluded because more extreme "normal aging" effects
on neuropsychological performance would be expected for such subjects.
     Education, occupation, and social position were matched within one level
based on scales prescribed by the Hollingshead Two Factor Index of Social
Position (23).  The educational scale was divided into seven levels with the
highest level of educational achievement scored as 1 and the lowest level
scored as 7.  The occupational scale was also divided into seven levels with
the highest level of occupational achievement scored as 1 and the lowest as
7.  The social position index was composed of five levels with a score of 1
representing the highest level.
     The control cohort participants were recruited primarily from the state
of Colorado and from the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas.  A total of 35
participants were recruited through referrals from case and control parti-
cipants; 24 controls were recruited through rosters of employees furnished
by businesses and public agencies; 37 participants were recruited through
investigator solicitation; and in 4 cases recruitment reference source data
                                -5-

-------
were incomplete.   The  controls  were  also  screened to make certain they did
not have histories of  drug  or alcohol  abuse  and that they had not previously
experienced CNS injuries.
     Participant Interview.  Specially trained field epidemiologists  inter-
viewed the matched pair case and control  cohorts.   The interview form
(Appendix A) included:  demographic  data, informed  consent  form, occupational
history, pesticide exposure history, OP poisoning  history (for cases) and an
abbreviated medical history.  In addition, the  spouse  or a  close relative
completed a questionnaire  rating the  participant's personality and several
functioning tests.  The physical, neurological and neuropsychological
examinations were usually  scheduled at the  conclusion of the interviews.
     Quality Control Assurances.  A continuous effort was  made to conduct
the study in Colorado and  Texas in  a  similar manner.   Two  field epidemiologists
from the Texas Program worked with  their counterparts at the Colorado Center
to standardize interview techniques and  the recording of data to insure
uniformity.
     The neuropsychological examiner  who conducted tests on the Texas cohorts
was trained and supervised by personnel  from the UCMC Neuropsychological
Laboratory.  The physicians conducting the  neurological evaluations  in Texas
and Colorado worked together to standardize their  procedures prior to the
start of the study and at  intervals throughout the period  of the study.
     Physical exams, neurological testing and neuropsychological testing of
Colorado participants were performed  at  UCMC in Denver, and Texas participants
were evaluated at the Texas Program offices and at the office of a practicing
neurologist in Brownsville, Texas.  These examinations took a total  of two days
for each participant to complete.  Since the protocol  consisted of a blind
study design, the participants were instructed not to reveal whether they were
                                 -6-

-------
a case or control  to  the  investigators conducting  the physical, neurological
and neuropsychological  evaluations.  All  participants received monetary com-
pensation as  reimbursement  for their time,  travel,  and expenses.
     Comprehensive Examination Protocol.  The  testing program about to
be described  was  designed by  board certified persons and other recognized
experts to be comprehensive in the sectors  of  physical, neurological and
neuropsychological examinations.  The  testing  program received peer review
and modification  before starting.  Generally accepted categories within
these examinations were evaluated by the  examiners using generally accepted
objective tests wherever possible.  Individual tests that  were redundant,
expensive, elaborate or very  specific  to  annual diseases or states of
impairment were avoided.
     Pesticide Residue and  Cholinesterase Testing.  Blood  samples were
collected from the participants  at the time of neurological examination.
These samples consisted of  a  volume of 10 ml  of venous  blood collected  in a
heparinized tube  for Cholinesterase  (ChE) assay (Appendix  B) and another  10
ml of venous blood collected  in  a non-heparinized tube  for chlorinated  hydro-
carbon pesticide residue analyses.
      Physical  Examinations.  All case and  control participants  were given
medical  examinations consisting of physical  examinations, neurological
evaluations,  electroencephalographic  examinations, and neuropsychological
testing.  The routine physical examination consisted  of complete  medical
histories, audiometric and ophthalmic examinations, and clinical  blood
evaluations.   The medical  histories and  routine physical  exams  were conducted
by the examining  neurologist.  The audiometric and ophthalmic examinations
were conducted by qualified  technicians.  Clinical blood  evaluations were
performed at  the  hospital  or office with which the examining neurologist was
associated.  All  data  were thoroughly reviewed by the  neurologist  at UCMC.
                               -7-

-------
Although every attempt was made  to  screen  potential case participants and
controls prior to these evaluations,  the results were used to detect and
screen out participants with  chronic  diseases such as diabetes, renal
failure, pernicious anemia and other  conditions that may produce neurologic
impairment.   Although no  such cases were found in the Colorado participants,
a few participants were eliminated  from the Texas group.  Standard forms used
for the physical examination  are contained in Appendix  D.  The participants
were informed of significant  findings on their physical examination and,
if indicated, they were advised  to  seek independent medical  follow-up.
In addition, significant  findings of  test  results were  summarized by the
neurologist and given to  the  participant's personal physician.
     Neurological Evaluation. As previously mentioned, all  subjects were
instructed not to reveal  their status as either a case  or a control partici-
pant during their neurological evaluation. The neurological  history and
formal review of systems  were recorded on  standard forms by  the  examining
neurologist. This was  followed  by  a  neurological examination which consisted
of an evaluation of mental  status,  cranial nerve function, motor system
function, sensory system  function,  and tests of cerebellar  function and
coordination. Tests  used in  each of these categories  are  shown  in Appendix  D.
      Electroencephalographic Examination. All study participants were
subjected to a routine clinical electroencephalogram on either 8 or 16
channel  Instruments* manufactured  by either the Grass or Beckman Companies.
Electrodes were applied  with paste according  to  the  International  10-20
placement system.  All tracings were recorded without patient sedation;
photic stimulation and hyperventilation were done on all  participants, and
sleep phase  recordings were  obtained when possible.   During the course of
the waking record, all patients had  nine  minutes of  data  from four channels
recorded onto a Vetter EM tape  recorder for offline  computer analysis.  The
                                -8-

-------
records were  read  visually  in  a  standard  clinical fashion and  interpreted as
either normal or abnormal;  details  of  the activity  seen were recorded on a
research report form (Appendix E).
     Neuropsychological  Testing.  The  study  participants were  presented
to the neurological  technicians  "blind".   All  subjects were administered
the neuropsychological  tests  in  approximately  the same order to eliminate
any bias associated  with the  order  of  test administration.  Each participant's
testing was completed in a  single work day.
     The tests consisted of the  Wechsler  Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
(24) and an expanded version  of  the test  battery originally developed  by
Halstead (25) and  Reitan (26).  Numerous  studies published over the last 30
years have shown that these tests are  sensitive to  focal  and diffuse cerebral
lesions caused  by  diverse neurologic conditions. Recent literature reviews
are presented by Reitan and Davison (27)  and Russel et  al.  (28).
     The expanded  Halstead-Reitan battery included  measures  of intelligence,
attention, various cognitive functions, motor proficiency,  sensory-perceptual
functions, aphasia and related disorders, and learning and  memory.  An objec-
tive personality  test was also given in an effort to determine whether
pesticide-case  participants showed  increased tendencies toward psychiatric
disturbances.  The following are brief descriptions of the  specific tests
and test scores  used in this study.  More detailed descriptions can be
found in the  references provided.
     Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (24):  The WAIS  is a well
known and widely used measure of adult intelligence (29).  The WAIS is also
known to be sensitive to acquired brain  lesions.  Scores used  in the WAIS
include the Verbal, Performance, Full  Scale IQ Values, and the scaled scores
on the individual  subtests (Information, Comprehension, Arithmetic, Similari-
                                -9-

-------
on the individual subtests (Information,  Comprehension, Arithmetic, Similari-
ties, Digit Span, Vocabulary, Digit Symbol, Picture Completion, Block Design,
Picture Arrangement, and Object Assembly).
     Halstead Category Test (25,30):  This  is a relatively complex nonverbal
test of abstraction and concept formation.   The subject's goal in the first
six subtests is to determine a unifying principle that, when applied to each
item on the subtest, would give the correct answer.  A seventh subtest is a
review group where the subject tries to remember the answer to items seen in
the earlier subtests.  The score is determined by the number of errors on
the total  of 208 items.
     Tactual Performance Test  (25,30):  In this test there are three trials
in which  the subject is blindfolded and asked to place ten geometrically
shaped blocks  into  their correct spaces on a form board.  The first trial is
done with the  dominant hand, trial two with the nondominant hand,  and on the
third trial both hands are used.  The three trials are timed, and  a maximum
of ten minutes is alloted for  each trial.  The measure used to reflect psycho-
motor problem  solving efficiency is the time  (minutes) taken  per block for
the  three trials combined.
     There are also two measures of incidental memory generated on the
Tactual  Performance Test.   The subject Is not  told  in  advance  to  remember
anything about the blocks or the board.   However, after the three trials are
completed the board is removed, the blindfold is taken off, and the subject
is asked to draw a picture of the form board from memory.  "Memory" points
are earned for correctly recalling  the shapes on the board, and "location"
points for shapes correctly localized  on the drawing.   A maximum of ten
points is possible on each of the measures.
     Speech Sounds  Perception Test  (25,30):  This test requires sustained
attention, accurate perception of verbal  auditory stimuli, and the ability
                                -10-

-------
 to match  simple spoken words with their written versions on  an  answer sheet.
 Sixty nonsense words are presented from a tape recorder, each having a
 middle "ee"  vowel sound and different consonant combinations at either end.
 Each of the  60 spoken nonsense words must be selected  (underlined)  from  among
 4 written alternatives on the answer sheet.  The score recorded is  the number
 of errors made on the 60 items.
      Seashore Rhythm Test  (25,30,31  )'•  This test requires  sustained attention,
 fine discrimination among nonverbal auditory stimuli,  plus short-term memory
 for such  stimuli.  The subject is presented 30 pairs of rhythms via a tape
 recorder, and for each pair,  is  required to indicate whether the second
 rhythm is the same or different  than the first rhythm.  The score recorded
 is the number of correct judgments  out of a possible 30.
      Finger Oscillation Test  (25,30):  This test of upper extremities' motor
 speed requires the subject  to tap as fast as possible  with the  index  finger,
 using an  apparatus which resembles  a telegraph key. The mean number  of  taps
 on five 10-second trials is recorded for each hand, and in this study these
 two fingers  are summed to  give a final measure of  tapping speed.
     Halstead Impairment  Index (25,30):   In current practice, this summary
measure of generalized  neuropsychological  deficit uses seven of the test
scores described  above:   Category;  Tactual  Performance Test Total Time,
Memory, and Location: Seashore Rhythm;  Speech  Sounds Perception; and Finger
Oscillation with  the  dominant  hand  only.   The  index is the proportion  of
scores on these  tests which  is in the  range  characteristic of patients with
documented cerebral lesions.  Higher index  scores increase the probability
of impaired cerebral  functioning.
     Trail Making Test, Part B (30,32):   This  paper-and-pencil  test requires
general alertness, spatial  analysis, motor speed, and  the ability to follow
                                 -11-

-------
 correct sequences of numbers and letters in an alternating fashion.   The
 score is determined by the number of seconds taken to complete the test.
     Aphasia Screening Examination (30,33):  This is Reitan's modified ver-
 sion of the Halstead-Wepman aphasia screening test (34).  This test is
 designed to screen for deficits in the participant's ability to:   name common
 objects; spell simple words; identify letters and numbers; read and write
 simple words and short statements; enunciate; repeat a short statement and
 explain Its meaning; work simple mathematical problems; demonstrate the use
 of a common object such as a key; and discriminate right from left.  A
 total aphasia score, which can range from 0 to 75, was derived from the
 scoring and item weighing system of Russell et al. @8).
     Spatial Relations (28):  This is a-measure of constructional dyspraxia,
 or degree of spatial distortion apparent in the subject's reproductions of
 geometric designs.  The score is based upon the subject's drawing of the
 Greek cross from the aphasia screening exam and his scaled score on the WAIS
 block design subtest (28,33).
     Reitan-Klove Sensory Perceptual  Examination (30):  During this examina-
 tion, tests are administered for finger tip number writing imperception
 (graph-esthesia), tactile finger recognition errors (finger dysgnosia), and
sensory suppressions (tactile, auditory, and visual extinction phenomena).
For each test, all error scores for both sides of the body are totaled to
provide a total perceptual error score.
     Average Impairment Rating (28):   This score is the average of the
ratings, which range from 0 (better than average) to 5 (severely impaired),
received by the participant on 11 of the Halstead-Reitan battery tests
described above and 1 WAIS measure.  The Average Impairment Rating differs
from the Halstead Impairment Index in that the former includes more tests
                                 -12-

-------
 and reflects the degree of overall impairment rather than  the range of
 abilities affected.
     Reitan-Klove Tactile Form Recognition  (30):  This test of stereognosis
 requires the study participant to discriminate among four  flat plastic
 shapes by touch alone.  A vertically positioned board is used, in which
 copies of the shapes are mounted on the board.  The score  is derived from
 the time (seconds) taken to complete 16 trials (8 trials with each hand).
     Smedley Hand Dynamometer:  This test of grip strength is often included
 in the Hal stead-Reitan battery for clinical and research investigations  (27 ).
 Two trials are given with each hand, and the average strength for each trial
 is recorded in kilograms (kg).  The final score is the sum of the mean  scores.
     Klove-Matthews Motor Steadiness Battery (27):  The grooved  pegboard test
 and the hole-type steadiness test are used  in this study.  The grooved peg-
 board (Lafayette Instrument Co., No. 32035) measures speed and fine motor
 coordination with the upper extremities.  This test requires the subject to
 place 25 small metal pegs into holes on a horizontal board as quickly as
possible.  The holes  have  grooves  on  one side,  so the pegs  will  not fit unless
they are positioned properly.  A  trial  is given with each hand.   The number of
seconds taken to  place all  25  pegs are recorded and totaled.   The hole-type
steadiness test  (Lafayette Instrument Co., No.  32011) is a test of static
steadiness.  The  study participant is asked to hold a stylus in the center
of six successively smaller holes, trying not to let the stylus touch the
sides.  The  stylus  is connected  to a  recorder.   Both hands are tested for all
six holes, and error scores are  totaled for the 12 trials.
    Peabody Individual  Achievement Test (35):   The Reading Recognition,
Reading Comprehension and  Spelling subtests are administered to provide
coverage of  these academic skills.  Percentile scores are used.
                                   -13-

-------
    Thurstone Word Fluency Test  (36):   In Part A of this written fluency test,
the study participant is given five minutes to write as many words as possible
that begin with the letter "S".   In Part B the participant  is given four
minutes to write as many four letter words as possible that begin with the
letter "C".  The total score is the number of words written in  these two
trials.
     Word  Finding  Test  (37):   In  this  test of verbal  problem solving ability,
the study  participant attempts  to guess the identity of a word from its  con-
texts within  a series of five  sentences.  After hearing each sentence,  the
participant is given  five seconds to  guess the word.   Then the next sentences
are presented successively to  provide additional  clues about the word.   After
the test  is completed the participant is given a point for each time  the word
is correctly identified within the five-second deadline.  There are 20 words,
each with  five trials.   A maximum score of 100 is theoretically attainable.
     Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (38,39 ):  In this test of perseverative
thinking,  the study participant is given a deck of cards with printed figures
 that vary  in number  (one  to four), shape (circle,  square, triangle,  cross),
 and color  (red, green,  blue, yellow).   Each  card in the deck is sorted  to
 one of four  stimulus cards that  vary  along the  same dimensions.  After  each
 sort, the  participant  is  told  only "right"  or "wrong".   The participant is
 never told the correct sorting rule,  which  initially is set as color.   As
 soon as the  participant sorts  10 cards in a  row to color, the sorting rule
 is changed (without  warning)  to  shape.  Any  further sorts to color are
 counted as perseverative responses.   Then,  after the participant makes  10
 consecutive  sorts  according to shape, the rule is  changed (again, without
 warning) to  number;  further sorts to  shape are counted as perseverative.
 The test proceeds  in this fashion until the  participant successfully  sorts
 through six  rule  changes, or  until 128 cards are sorted (whichever occurs
 first).  The score is  the total  number of perseverative responses.
                                  -U-

-------
     Modified Reitan Story Memory Test, Part A (40):  This is a test of
verbal learning and memory.  During the learning phase the study participant
listens to a tape recording of a short story and is asked to repeat as much
of the story as possible.  If the participant cannot give a minimum of 15
of the 28 pieces of information in the story, up to 4 more learning trials
are given to reach this criterion.  Memory testing for the story is done four
hours after the learning phase is completed.  Efficiency of learning is
operationally defined as the number of learning trials necessary to reach the
above criterion.  The memory score is the percent change in the amount of
information reported at the last learning trial and the amount of information
recalled four hours later.
     Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI):  The MMPI provides
objective measures of major dimensions of psychopathology:  Hypochondrias!s;
depression; hysteria; psychopathic deviance; paranoia; psychasthenia;
schizophrenia; and mania (41,43).
     Each participant and an adult relative were asked to independently rate
the participant's functioning with respect to many abilities, objectively
assessed by the neuropsychological test battery.   These independent ratings
were completed using questionnaires developed by the staff at the UCMC Neuro-
psychology Laboratory.  Although  these rating scores were not expected to be
as sensitive as standardized laboratory tests, the rating scores were included
to provide additional evaluation  of the participants' everyday functioning,
as perceived by the participants  themselves and by their close relatives.
     Statistical Analysis.  As previously described, each case was carefully
matched with a control participant within each of the two geographic locations
in this study.  If the grouping of study participants by geographic location
were ignored, the standard paired t-test would be the appropriate statistical
                                -15-

-------
analysis of any single quantitative variable (for example, Average Impairment
Rating or Hal stead Impairment Index).  Whereas matching of cases and controls
was made on the basis of age, education, and socioeconomic level, differences
did exist among pairs with respect to age, education, and socioeconomic level.
Such differences were important in order to avoid limitations of the study to
a restricted age, education, or socioeconomic group.
     The statistical  analysis appropriate for the study design was an analysis
of variance procedure typically referred to as a split-plot analysis but, in
this study, more appropriately called a "split-pair" analysis (44).  If
differences in age and education were to exist among the Colorado and Texas
participants, then geographic location would be a potential source of varia-
tion.
     Correlation coefficients were calculated for the primary neuro-
psychological scores  relative to the plasma and RBC cholinesterase values
and the total organochlorine pesticide residues.
     Data from the comprehensive neurological examination were qualitative
in that the results of each specific neurological test were typically
recorded as "normal"  or "abnormal".  For some neurological tests, the results
were classified in more than two categories.  Because of the matching of cases
with controls in this study, the proper unit for statistical analysis was the
matched pair rather than the individual case.  Thus, in the case of a dichot-
omous outcome, the appropriate statisitcal test was McNemar's chi-square test
rather than the usual unpaired chi-square test (45).  In the case of a poly-
chotomous outcome, the Stuart chi-square test for matched-pairs was applied
(46).
     In addition to the analysis of variance of each neuropsychological score,
the set of 34 neuropsychological variables (i.e., the subtests from the WAIS,
                                -16-

-------
 Halstead-Reitan, Peabody, and Added Ability batteries) were analyzed simul-
 taneously via a multivariate analysis of variance procedure for matched-
 pairs designs (47).  To further evaluate differences  between the case and
 control cohorts, each of the above four batteries of  neuropsychological tests
 were statistically analyzed via the same multivariate analysis of variance
 procedure.
 RESULTS
     Demographic Data.  The study  population consisted  of  100 matched  pairs
 (41 pairs from Colorado and 59 pairs from  Texas).  Except  for one pair,  all
 study participants belonged to the white race.   With respect to ethnic group
 there were 14 pairs of Mexican-Americans (6 pairs  from  Colorado and 8  pairs
 from Texas).  Most of the Mexican-Amen"can study participants belonged to
 the agricultural labor force.
     All of the participants were male  except one  matched  pair of females.
 It was anticipated at the start of the  study that  a  number of female pairs
 would be recruited; although it was never  a goal of  the study to study sex
 differences.  However, only one female  pair could  be recruited for the
 study.
     Ninety-six percent of the organophosphate  pesticide poisonings were
 occupationally related, and four percent were nonoccupationally related. The
 occupations of the cases are summarized in Table 1.  Agricultural aircraft
 mixers-loaders-flagmen, accounted for 38 of the 96 occupationally related
 cases; agricultural aircraft pilots and mechanics  accounted for 19 of  the
 cases; formulating plant employees, 13; fanners and  ranchers, 11; agricultural
 specialty workers (greenhouse, nursery  and ornamental plant workers and
 horticulturists), 7; and farm laborers and field workers, 4.  No pest
control  operators were among  the cases  studied.   Of the  four cases non-
                                 -17-

-------
Table 1.   Occupations of  organophosphate pesticide  poisoning  cases.
          Neuro-organophosphate  Study,  1979.
Occupational Group
Occupationally Related Cases
Formulating Plant Worker
Agricultural Chemical Sales
Commercial Applicator Related
Aircraft Mixer-Loader, Fl agger
Pest Control Operators (PCOs)
Aircraft Spray Pilot, Mechanic
Ground Sprayer Crew
Farmer/Rancher
Agricultural Worker - Misc. Related
Farm Laborer, Field Worker
Greenhouse Operator, Nursery-Ornamental
Worker, Horticulturist
Non-occupational ly Related Cases
Child
Machinist
Student

Colorado
9
0
0
11
0
2
2
6
1
2
6
1
1
0

Texas
4
1
0
27
0
17
0
5
0
2
1
1
0
1
TOTAL
Total
13
1
0
38
0
19
2
11
1
4
7
2
1
1
100
                                   -18-

-------
occupationally related,  two were children at the time of poisoning,  one was
a machinist,  and the fourth was a college student.
     Table 2 presents the age means and standard deviations for the  case
and control study cohorts.  The mean age for all participants at the time of
the study was approximately 35 years.  The difference between the age means
for the study and control participants was approximately four months.  The
mean age for  the  participants  from Colorado was  39 years; the participants
from Texas  were somewhat younger.   The age of the study  participants  ranged
from 16 to  66.
          Table 2.  Age means  and standard deviations  (S.D.)  of
                   all study  participants*.  Neuro-organophos-
                   phate Study, 1979.

All
Participants
Colorado
Participants
Texas
Participants

Mean
Mean
S.D.
Mean
S.D.
Cases
35.01
12.53
38.85
12.02
32.34
12.28
Control s
35.28
13.02
39.20
12.28
32.56
12.92
Cases and
Controls
35.15
39.02
12.08
32.45
12.55
          *Data  is based  on  age at time of physical  and neurological
           examinations.

     A summary of the  Hollingshead Index of Social  Position, a function of
both education and occupation, is shown in Table 3.   The mean value calculated
for all participants was  3.05.  Although the mean HolUngshead social class
value fell within the  lower middle class scale, the Hollingshead values for
the matched pairs represented a much wider range of social class positions.
                                  -19-

-------
As measured by the Hollingshead Index,  Colorado  participants  were from a

slightly  lower social class  position  than  Texas  participants.  The age and

Hollingshead  Index of Social  Position are  listed for the 100  matched pairs

in the study  in Table 4.
          Table  3.  Mean Hollingshead  social  class and standard
                   deviation  (S.D.) of case  and control  partici-
                   pants*.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                                                        Cases  and
                                 Cases      Controls     Controls

                        Mean     3.22         2.88         3.05
          All
          Participants	S.0^	1^50	1.71	li§l__


                        Mean     3.15         3.44         3.29
          Colorado
          Participants   S.D.     1.59         1.16         1.39


                        Mean     3.27         2.49         2.88
          Texas
          Participants   S.D.     1.45         1.92         1.74

          *Data is based on age at time of physical and neurological
          examinations.
                                 -20-

-------
Table 4.   Age and Hollingshead social  position  scales  for study participants
          by matched pairs.   Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
Hollingshead Social Position
Study
Pair No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
36
34
36
32
57
52
37
35
40
39
40
45
46
42
47
45
54
55
40
40
45
49
23
24
43
45
40
42
36
33
Education
Scale
5
4
2
1
5
3
2
4
5
4
1
1
3
3
3
3
6
4
3
3
4
4
5
4
5
6
4
3
4
5
Occupation
Scale
5
5
3
3
4
4
2
2
3
4
1
1
2
2
3
4
3
5
4
3
2
2
5
6
3
3
3
3
4
5
Index
Score
55
51
29
25
48
40
22
30
41
44
11
11
26
26
33
40
45
51
40
33
30
30
55
58
41
45
37
33
44
55
Social
Class
IV
IV
III
II
	 S
IV
III
II
III
III
IV
I
I
III
III
III
III
IV
IV
III
III
III
III
IV
IV
III
IV
III
III
IV
IV
                                  -21-

-------
Table  4.   (Continued)
Study
Pair No.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
39
42
25
28
55
56
25
26
52
53
62
66
41
44
19
19
57
57
35
34
39
44
22
23
39
39
38
40
18
19
Holl
Education
Scale
3
3
4
4
2
2
4
4
2
3
6
6
4
4
4
4
3
3
2
3
6
6
3
3
3
3
7
7
4
4
lingshead Social Position
Occupation
Scale
5
4
5
4
3
3
6
6
2
3
7
5
4
3
7
7
4
3
4
3
5
6
7
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
Index
Score
47
40
51
44
29
29
58
58
22
33
73
59
44
37
65
65
40
33
36
33
59
66
61
47
47
47
77
77
65
65
Social
Class
IV
III
IV
IV
III
III
IV
IV
II
III
V
IV
IV
III
V
V
III
III
III
III
IV
V
V
IV
IV
IV
V
V
V
V
          -22-

-------
                          Table 4 .   (Continued)
Hollingshead Social Position
Study
Pair No.
31
32
33
34
35
36
37*
38
39
40
41
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
36
35
19
19
44
46
48
44
23
22
36
34
19
20
46
45
48
48
26
26
62
64
Education
Scale
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
4
4
5
4
1
2
4
4
4
4
Occupation
Scale
6
4
6
6
4
5
4
4
5
6
2
3
4
4
6
7
1
2
3
5
5
5
Index
Score
66
52
58
58
44
51
44
44
51
58
22
33
44
44
62
65
11
22
37
51
51
51
Social
Class
V
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
II
III
IV
IV
V
V
I
II
III
IV
IV
IV

* Female pair.
                                    -23-

-------
Table 4.  (Continued)
Study
Pair No.
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
54
60
36
33
22
23
22
25
49
48
21
22
50
48
51
54
27
29
47
53
27
29
16
17
35
35
Hoi
Education
Scale
3
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
2
1
1
5
3
5
5
1
1
lingshead Social Position
Occupation
Scale
3
5
1
1
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
7
4
4
2
3
3
3
1
2
5
6
7
7
1
1
Index
Score
33
51
11
11
51
51
51
51
41
51
51
65
44
44
18
29
24
29
11
18
55
34
69
69
11
11
Social
Class
III
IV
I
I
IV
IV
IV
IV
III
IV
IV
V
IV
IV
II
III
II
III
I
II
IV
III
V
V
I
I
            -24-

-------
Table 4. (Continued)
Hollingshead Social Position
Study
Pair No.
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
53
54
34
31
26
26
26
24
22
20
25
26
23
23
36
36
27
29
29
32
39
42
25
25
31
30
Education
Scale
7
4
3
3
4
3
2
2
6
6
3
4
3
4
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
Occupation
Scale
2
3
5
2
6
7
4
3
5
6
4
6
5
5
3
4
3
3
3
6
4
2
5
3
5
3
Index
Score
42
37
47
26
58
61
36
29
59
66
40
58
47
51
29
40
33
33
37
58
44
30
47
33
47
33
Social
Class
III
III
IV
II
IV
V
HI
III
IV
V
III
IV
IV
IV
III
III
III
III
III
IV
IV
III
IV
III
IV
III
             -25-

-------
Table 4.   (Continued)

Study
Pair No.
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80

Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control

Age at
Interview
19
19
47
47
27
24
25
25
28
32
17
17
27
27
27
28
22
21
23
24
26
28
17
17
20
19
Hnll
Education
Scale
4
5
6
5
4
2
3
3
5
3
5
5
2
2
4
4
3
3
5
7
4
3
4
4
6
5
ing^hpaH Snri
Occupation
Scale
7
6
4
6
6
4
3
4
6
7
7
7
4
3
5
5
4
4
6
7
4
3
5
7
5
7
al PnQiti
Index
Score
65
62
52
62
58
36
33
40
62
61
69
69
36
29
51
51
40
40
62
77
44
33
51
65
59
69
on
Social
Class
V
V
IV
V
IV
III
III
III
V
V
V
V
III
III
IV
IV
III
III
V
V
IV
.III
IV
V
IV
V
           -26-

-------
Table 4.  (Continued)
Hollingshead Social Position
Study
Pair No.
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
22
23
19
18
29
28
56
55
50
51
52
53
55
56
47
48
26
27
64
66
56
57
31
26
23
22
Education
Scale
3
2
5
4
2
2
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
4
3
Occupation
Scale
3
2
5
7
2
2
4
3
7
5
3
1
3
2
3
4
5
4
3
3
4
7
3
2
5
7
Index
Score
33
22
55
65
22
22
44
33
65
51
29
15
33
26
33
40
47
40
33
37
44
61
29
22
51
61
Social
Class
III
II
IV
V
II
II
IV
III
V
IV
III
I
III
II
III
III
IV
III
III
III
IV
V
III
II
IV
V
             -27-

-------
Table 4 .   (Continued)
Hollingshead Social Position
Study
Pair No.
94
95
96
97
98
99
TOO
Case or
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Case
Control
Age at
Interview
29
29
29
32
27
25
22
20
28
25
34
34
27
29
Education
Scale
3
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
Occupation
Scale
4
2
1
2
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
7
3
Index
Score
40
22
13
22
47
47
51
51
47
40
47
51
65
37
Social
Class
III
II
I
II
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
III
IV
IV
V
III
             -28-

-------
     Acute Organophosphate Pesticide Poisoning Histories.   The year of the
primary OP pesticide poisoning reported by the case participants ranged from
1950 to 1976.   There were 11  participants in the case cohort who reported
more than one noteworthy OP pesticide poisoning:  eight of these experienced
two poisonings, one experienced three poisonings, and two reported four
poisonings.  One case reported a poisoning as early as July 1948.  Documentary
information usually was not available on the multiple poisonings other than
for the primary incident.
     The mean  time for all  cases from the primary poisoning to the time of
the neurological  and neuropsychological  examinations was about nine years.
The time from the index poisoning incident to the date of the neurological
and psychological examinations is important because examination close to the
time of poisoning could be measuring adverse results which were, in fact,
reversible acute  poisoning responses rather than long-term effects.  The
elapsed time from the last poisoning case to the date of neuropsychological
examination is given in Table 5 below for the case cohort.  There was a longer
mean elapsed time for the Colorado cases, 4228 days (about 11 years, 7 months)
than for the Texas cases, 2574 days (about 7 years, 19 days).  The mean
elapsed time from the date of the last poisoning case to neuropsychological
          Table 5.  Elapsed time in days from last poisoning to
                    neuropsychological examination.  Neuro-
                    organophosphate Study, 1979.


All cases
Colorado
Texas
Number
of Cases
100
41
59

Range
117-9640
650-8065
117-9640

Mean
3252
4228
2574
                                    -29-

-------
testing for all cases was  3252 days  (about  8 years,  11 months).  The shortest
time period from date of poisoning to  date  of examination was  117  days.   It
is of interest that  the RBC  and  plasma cholinesterase  values on  this person
were well within the normal  range at the  time of  the study examinations.
     Among the  100 case participants,  10 different OP pesticides were impli-
cated as the cause of the  primary poisoning  (Table 6).  Detailed information
on these chemicals,  such as  chemical structure, toxicity,  and uses is given
in Appendix F.   Methyl  parathion was implicated tn 54 cases, more than any
other chemical;  ethyl parathion was  implicated in 42 poisonings.   These two
chemicals accounted  for 79%  of the total  episodes.  The two chemicals are
very similar in  structure, toxicological  effects, in practical field use, and
sometimes they are applied in combination.   Their predominance as a cause
of human poisoning may be  explained  by the fact that they have been in use
for a number of years,  are highly toxic,  and are among the most widely used
pesticides in the  United States.  All  of the incidents involving methyl
parathion were among the Texas case  participants, whereas ethyl  parathion was
involved in poisonings in  both Colorado and Texas.
     Physical Examination  and Clinical Laboratory Data.  Abnormalities
detected during  the physical examinations were recorded on the physical exam
forms (Appendix  D).   Table 7 summarizes the  findings of the physical exami-
nation of case and control participants.   Abnormalities were observed by the
examining physicians in 11 of the 15 categories on the physical  examination
forms.  Slightly more abnormalities  were observed among the controls  (48)
than among the cases (44), but the difference was not statistically signifi-
cant.
                                  -30-

-------
Table 6.   Organophosphate pesticides  implicated  in  the primary
          poisoning  incidents*.   Neuro-organophosphate Study,
          1979.
                                     Number of  Cases
OP Pesticide
Methyl parathion
Parathion
Disulfoton (Di-Syston)
Mai a th ion
Mevinphos (Phosdrin)
Dicrotophos (Bidrin)
TEPP
Dioxathion (Delnav)
DEF
Phorate (Thitnet)
TOTAL
Colorado
0
24
8
6
5
1
1
0
0
1

Texas
54
18
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0

Total
54
42
8
6
5
2
2
1
1
1
122
*The occurrence of OP pesticides exceeds the number of cases in the
 study because more than one OP pesticide was implicated in some
 incidents.
                              -31-

-------
Table 7 .   Summary of abnormal  conditions  identified  in  participants during
           physical examination.   Neuro-organophosphate  Study,  1979.

                                     n = 98 pairs
Category
General appearance
Skin
Head
Ears
Eyes
Nose
Mouth
Neck
Thorax
Breasts
Lungs
Heart
Vessels
Abdomen
Skeletal
Total
Cases
3
10
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
1
7
2
3
2
11
44
Controls
1
11
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
7
4
6
4
10
48
Total
4
21
0
2
7
0
0
0
1
1
14
6
9
6
21
92
                                   -32-

-------
     Skin and  skeletal were the two most frequently recorded abnormalities
as each abnormality  was  observed 21 times.   Abnormalities in the category of
the lungs was  the  third  highest and occurred in 7% of the participants.
Abnormal breath sounds was  the dominant finding among the lung abnormalities.
The frequency  of occurrence of abnormalities in the other categories  were
varied and no  abnormalities were found in four categories.  However,  the
slight differences between  cases and controls with respect to the physical
examination categories were not statistically significant.
     Although  no participants were excluded from the study due to physical,
audiometric, ophthalmic, or clinical blood examination results, three poten-
tial participants  were excluded from the study because of previous medical
conditions identified during the medical history taken by the examining
physician.
     Clinical  Laboratory Results.  The blood samples collected from the study
participants were  evaluated using standard laboratory tests (Appendix D).
The results of 28  different laboratory tests were recorded for each partici-
pant.  Results were  recorded as normal and abnormal.  Statistical analysis
of the hematology, creatinine, and urea nitrogen test results were based on
the chi-square test for  matched pairs, as described in the Methods section.
Hone of these  chi-square tests were statistically significant  (Table 8).
     Neurological  Data.   The neurological testing was an  important aspect of
this study and included  two categories:  neurological examinations and  the
electroencephalographic  examinations.  The neurological examinations shown
in Appendix D consisted  of the following general  categories:  mental  status,
cranial nerves, motor system, sensory system, integrative functions and  other.
     The  electroencephalogram  (EEG) is a relatively subtle  indicator of
structural and functional integrity of the cerebral cortex.  Evaluation of
                                    -33-

-------
    Table 8.  Summary of the statistical comparison of  the  cases
              and controls with respect to selected laboratory  test
              variables.  Neuro-organophosphate Study,  1979.
Test Variable
Lab Tests
White blood cells
Red blood cells
Hemoglobin
Hematocrit
Lymphocytes
Eos inoph lies
Urea nitrogen
Creatinine
Degrees of
Freedom
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
Chi-square
Statistic
2.00
.80
2.82
3.27
.04
1.23
2.14
1.93
p- Level
.368
.670
.244
.195
.980
.267
.343
.381
the EEG is usually  a subjective process depending on pattern recognition by
the electroencephalographer.   Recognition and descriptions of specific
patterns are often  based on scientific intuition.  The EEG has been an
important tool  in determining overall  cortical function In many clinical
and research situations.
      Based  on the  visual analysis of EEG, as well as the descriptive inter-
 pretation of the EEG, each study participant's EEG results were categorized
 as normal or as abnormal (mild, moderate or severe).  A summary of the results
 of the encephalograms are shown in Table 9.  Statistical analyses of the
 electroencephalogram results yielded a 1.06 chi-square value (p = .589, with
 2 degrees of freedom) approximately 83 per cent of the cases and 88 per cent
 of the controls had normal readings. Although computer spectral analyses
 were planned to supplement the visual  interpretation, the spectral analyses
 were not completed due  to computerization problems at the University of
 Colorado Medical Center.
                                  -34-

-------
    Table 9.   Summary  of  the results  of the  encephalogram (EEC)
              evaluation  of case  and  control  participants.
              Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                       Abnormal

Cases
Controls
Moderate
2
1
Mild
14
10
Normal
83
88
Total
99
99
     The neurological  exam was divided  into six  general  categories:   Mental
Status, Cranial  Nerves, Motor System, Sensory  System,  Integrative Functions,
and Other.   Each of the six general  categories consisted of a number of
separate examination components.   The components were  rated and coded on the
exam form by the neurologist as normal, not significant, or abnormal (Appendix
10).  A summary  evaluation of the  separate components  for each general
category was similarly assigned by the  neurologist.
     Table 10 shows the summary of the  statistical  comparison of the cases
and controls with respect  to Mental  Status, Cranial  Nerves and Motor System
categories.   The following six tables  (Tables  11-16) present a summary of the
data used in calculating the chi-square values in summary Table 10.
     There were  several components of  the overall Mental Status evaluation:
State of Consciousness; Orientation; Language; Memory; Serial Subtraction;
Abstraction; and Mood. The results of the neurological  evaluation of these
components of Mental Status are summarized in  Table 11.   Although the State
of Consciousness results showed the cases to be more anxious than the controls,
the difference between these groups was not statistically significant.  With
respect to Orientation (time; place; and person) and Language (Pressure and
Structure), there was  little or no difference between the cases and controls
(Table 10).   Similarly, for three  parts of the Memory evaluation (Numbers
Forward; Numbers Backward; and Remote  Memory), the difference between cases
                                 -35-

-------
and controls  was  not statistically significant.   However,  one part  of  the
Memory component  (Three-Pairs-of-Item)  showed over twice as many abnormal
classifications in the cases as in the  controls  (p = .006).  Based  on  the
matched-pairs analysis, there was no significant difference between the  cases
and controls  in Serial Subtraction component.  Of the ten abnormal  classifica-
tions in the  Abstraction component, nine belonged to the case cohort (p  =  .028).
The neurological  evaluation of Mood is  an important aspect of Mental Status.
It is of considerable interest that six of the case participants and none
of the control participants were classified as "depressed" (p = .0003).  Based
on the neurologist's summary evaluation of Mental Status, 64 of 99 case
participants  and 45 of 99 control participants were categorized as abnormal.
The matched-pairs analysis found this difference between the two cohorts
to be highly significant (p =  .013).
     The summary evaluation of the Cranial Nerve category  showed no
significant difference between the case and  control  participants (Table 10).
The  individual components of the Cranial Nerve  category,  such  as Bilateral
Neurosensory Hearing,  Eye Mobility and Sense of Smell,  were  not found to be
significantly  different between  the two cohorts.   Table 12 shows that 64
cases and  59 controls  were  evaluated as normal  on  the Cranial  Nerve summary.
     Twenty-three components  (Appendix D)  were  considered by the neurologist
 in  the  evaluation of the Motor System.  Although the difference in summary
evaluations  for  the case and  control cohorts was not statistically significant,
 (Table  10),  some of the individual  components were significantly different.
 For example,  in  the knee jerk test,  the case cohort was significantly different
 from the control cohort (p = .024).  However, in the ankle jerk test, the
 difference between the case and control  cohorts was not statistically significant.
 The data on  selected components of the Motor System are presented in Tables
 14 and 15 and the data on the Motor System summary evaluation are presented in
 Table 16.
                                 -36-

-------
Table 10.  Summary of the statistical  comparison of the cases  and  controls
          with respect to mental  status,  cranial nerves,  and  motor  system.
          Neuro-organophosphate Study,  1979.
Degrees of
Test Variable Freedom
MENTAL STATUS
Mental Status Summary Evaluation
State of Consciousness
Orientation
Time
Place
Person
Language
Pressure
Structure
Memory
Numbers Forward
Numbers Backward
Three Pairs of Items
Remote
Serial Subtraction
Abstraction
Mood
CRANIAL NERVES
Cranial Nerve Summary Evaluation
MOTOR SYSTEM
Right and ieft Knee Jerk
Right and Left Ankle Jerk
Motor System Summary Evaluation
1
1

1
1
1

1
1

1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
8
7
2
Chi -Square
Statistic
6.35
0.07

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.55
3.03
7.50
0.00
3.08
4.90
18.00
1.41
17.64
8.52
2.90
P-
Value
.013
.791

	
	
	

	
	

.481
.086
.006
	
.290
.028
.001
.494
.024
.289
.235
                                  -37-

-------
Table 11.   Evaluation of  case  and  control  participants  with respect to the
           summary  and components  of  the mental status category of the neuro-
           logical  examination.  Neuro-organophosphate  Study, 1979.
    Test  Variable
Abnormal
Normal     Total
Summary Evaluation
of Mental Status Cases
Controls
Orientation
Time Cases
Control s
Place Cases
Controls
Person Cases
Control s
Language
Pressure Cases
Controls
Structure Cases
Control s
Memory
Numbers Forward Cases
Controls
Numbers Backward Cases
Controls
64
45
1
0
0
1
0
0

0
1
0
0

23
18
25
14
35
54
98
99
99
98
99
99

99
98
99
99

76
81
74
85
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99

99
99
99
99

99
99
99
99
                                 -38-

-------
Table 11 (continued)
    Test Variable
             Abnormal
          Normal      Total
  Memory (continued)
     Three  Pairs  of Items
     Remote
  Serial Subtraction
  Abstraction
Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
30
14
 0
 0
28
21

 9
 1
69
85
99
99
71
78
90
98
99
99

99
99

99
99

99
99
                                  -39-

-------
Table 12.  Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the
           state of consciousness and mood from the mental status category OT
           the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study,
           1979.
Test Variable
        Anxious
                                                        Normal
                                                               Total
State of Consciousness
                              Cases
                              Controls
                                           8
                                           6
                      91
                      93
             99
             99
Mood
                             Euphoric   Depressed   Normal
                  Cases         1           6         92
                  Controls      0           0         99
                                                                     99
                                                                     99
 Tabie
            tion.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                Normal
  Cases
  Controls
              64
              59
                                                 Abnormal
                          Nonsignificant
                Significant
9
7
26
33
                                                                       Total
99
99
                                    -40-

-------
Table 14.   Evaluation of case  and  control participants with  respect to the
           knee  jerk  (right  and left  combined)  test of the neurological
           examination.  Neuro-organophosphate  Study, 1979.
Cases
Controls

Table 15.
Cases
Controls

Table 16.
Cases
Controls
One 0
Other 0
2
2

One 0 One 1 One 1 One 2
Other 1 Other 1 Other 2 Other 2 Total
1 75 9
6 64 9
0 = Absent
1 - Normal
2 = Hyperactive
Evaluation of case and control participants with
ankle jerk (right and left combined) test of the
examination. Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
One 0
Other 0
3
6

10 95
16 97

respect to the
neurological
One 0 One 1 One 1 One 2
Other 1 Other 1 Other 2 Other 2 Total
10 75 1
10 67 0
0 = Absent
1 = Normal
2 = Hyperactive
8 97
14 97

Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to
the motor system score test of the neurological examination.
Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
Normal
61
54
Abnormal
Nonsignificant Significant
8 30
16 29
Total
99
99
                                -41-

-------
     The sensory system was further evaluated through  a  series  of 10
additional clinical tests.   The tests included response  to  pin  pricks,  touch,
vibration, position identification, discrimination,  graphesthesia, and  stereog-
nosis (Appendix D).  Table  17 summarizes  the results of  the statisitical
analyses of the sensory system tests and  the sensory system summary score.
There were no statistically significant differences  between the case and
control  cohorts on any of these tests or  on the sensory  system  summary  evalua-
tion.  Tables 18-24 present the summary results of the sensory  system tests.
Analyses showed there were  slight differences in the pin prick  lower left
extremity where a total of  96 controls were normal compared to  89 cases that
were normal (Table 21), but the results were not statistically  significant
(D = .072).
     Table 17.  Summary of the statistical comparison of the cases
                and controls with respect to  the  sensory system.
                Neuro-organophosphate Study,  1979.
Test Variable
SENSORY SYSTEM
Pin Upper Right Extremity
Pin Upper Left Extremity
Pin Lower Right Extremity
Pin Lower Left Extremity
Vibration, Right
Vibration, Left
Sensory System Evaluation
Degrees of
Freedom
5
5
3
3
4
5
2
Chi-Square
Statistic
5.20
8.00
3.20
7.00
5.10
4.03
3.54
P-
Level
.392
.156
.362
.072
.277
.545
.170
                                 -42-

-------
            Table  18.  Evaluation  of case  and control  participants  with  respect to  the  pin upper right
                       extremity test of the  neurological  examination.   Neuro-organophosphate  Study,  1979.
U)
I

Cases
Controls
Table 19.

Cases
Controls
Normal
94
92
Evaluation
extremity
Normal
93
95

Mild
0
2
of case
test of

M1ld
0
2
Peripheral
Moderate
1
0

Severe
1
0
and control participants with
the neurological examination.
Peripheral
Moderate
1
0

Severe
1
0

M1ld
2
3
Focal
Moderate
0
1

Severe
0
0
respect to the pin upper left
Neuro-organophosphate Study,

M1ld
3
0
Focal
Moderate
0
1

Severe
0
0
Total
98
98
1979.
Total
98
98

-------
Table 20.  Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the pin lower right
           extremity test of the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.


Cases
Controls

Normal
91
95

M1ld
0
0
Peripheral
Moderate
2
0

Severe
1
0

Mild
3
2
Focal
Moderate
0
0

Severe
0
0

Total
97
97
Table  21.  Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the pin lower left
           extremity test of the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                        	Peripheral	           •	Focal	

	Normal     Mild     Moderate     Severe	Mild     Moderate     Severe     Total


Cases          89         0          3           1           40           0         97

Controls       96         0          0           0           10           0         97

-------
Table  22.  Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the vibration, right test
           of the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.


Cases
Controls

Normal
74
66

Mild
10
13
Peripheral
Moderate
6
8

Severe
1
0

Mild
0
0
Focal
Moderate
0
2

Severe
0
0

Total
91
91
Table  23. Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the vibration, left test
           of the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                                 Peripheral                           Focal
             Normal     Mild     Moderate     Severe       Mild     Moderate     Severe     Total


Cases          70        13         5           1           2          0           0         91

Controls       65"       16         6           0           22           0         91

-------
Table 24.   Summary  evaluation  of  case and control  participants with respect
            to  the sensory system  of  the  neurological  examination.   Neuro-
            organophosphate Study, 1979.
Abnormal

Cases
Controls
Normal
66
62
Nonsignificant
2
1
Significant
30
35
Total
98
98
                                   -46-

-------
     Table 25 is a summary of the matched-pairs  analyses  of selected  integra-
tive function tests and other miscellaneous  examinations.   Appendix D includes
examination forms used in these tests.   A total  of seven  individual component
tests were used in the integrative  function  summary evaluations.  These  compo-
nent lists included posture,  balance,  gait,  and  cerebellar functions, such
as finger to nose and heel to skin.  Tables  26-29  present a summary of the
results of the individual component tests.   The  integrative function  summary
evaluation was normal for 77  cases  and 85 controls out  of 99 matched  pairs
(p = .185).
     Other miscellaneous examinations  included examination of the skull,
carotids, and back (Appendix  D).  Based on the chi-square test for matched
pairs (Table 25), there was no statistical  difference between the case and
control cohorts on the summary evaluation of other miscellaneous examinations
(Table 24).  As seen from Table 29, there were 98  cases and 95 controls  normal
on the other miscellaneous examination summary evaluation.
     Table 25.  Summary of the statistical comparison  of the cases
                and controls with respect to  integrative function
                and other miscellaneous examinations.   Neuro-
                organophosphate Study,  1979.
Degrees of
Test Variable Freedom
Finger-nose Right
Finger- nose Left
Integrative Function Evaluation
Other Misc. Exam Evaluation
3
3
2
2
Chi -Square
Statistic
3.92
0.60
3.38
2.00
P-
Level
.270
.896
.185
.368
                                  -47-

-------
             Table 26.  Evaluation of case and control participants with respect to the finger-nose right test

                        of the neurological examination.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
oo
i
Abnormal Peripheral
Cases
Control s
Table 27.
Normal
85
88
Mild
10
5
Evaluation of case
of the neurological
Moderate
0
2
and control
examination
Severe
0
0
Mild
1
1
Abnormal Focal
Moderate
0
0

Severe
0
0
participants with respect to the finger-nose
. Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
Abnormal Peripheral
Cases
Controls
Normal
86
87
Mild
7
5
Moderate
2
3
Severe
0
0
Mild
1
1
Abnormal Focal
Moderate
0
0

Severe
0
0
Total
96
96
left test
Total
96
96

-------
Table 28.  Summary evaluation of case and control participants with respect
           to the integrative function of the neurological examination.
           Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                                   Abnormal
            Normal
           Nonsignificant     Significant     Total
Cases
Control s
77
85
2
0
20
14
99
99
Table 29    Summary evaluation of case  and  control  participants with  respect
            to other miscellaneous exams  of the  neurological  examination.
            Neuro-organophosphate Study,  1979.
Cases
Controls
                                   Abnormal
Normal
  98
  95
                        Nonsignificant     Significant      Total
1
3
0
1
99
99
                                 -49-

-------
     Neuropsychological Findings.  Results of neuropsychological evaluations
are presented in this section according to three subdivisions:  objective
tests administered in the neuropsychological laboratory; results of the
participant-completed Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory which
was administered at the time of neuropsychological examination; and results
of the Relative's Assessment of Patient-Functioning Inventory that was com-
pleted at the time of interview.  As mentioned previously, these data were
analyzed via an analysis of variance procedure specific to designs involving
matched-pairs.  The detailed results of the analysis of variance of the
neuropsychological test battery and the MMPI are presented in Appendix F.
These results are summarized in Tables 30-32, which present the mean score
for the case and control cohorts and the probability-level (p-level) for the
analysis of variance test comparing the case and control means.
     Results of the Halstead-Reitan Battery revealed that the case cohort was
significantly more impaired than the control cohort on both summary measures
 Average Impairment Rating  and  Halstead  Impairment Index (p < .001 and p =
 .020,  respectively).   Although both of  the  group means are in the normal range
 on these measures, 24  of the cases  and  only 12 of the controls obtained scores
 in the "impaired" range on one or both  of the measurements.  That is, on the
 basis  of previously validated  limits  (1.55  for the Average Impairment Rating
 and 0.5 for the Halstead Index), twice  as many case participants as control
 participants showed an overall level  of neuropsychological deficit that is with-
 in the range characteristic of individuals  with documented cerebral lesions.
 Based  on the matched-pairs chi-square analysis, this difference between the
 case and control cohorts was  statistically  significant (p < .05).  In the
 Halstead-Reitan battery, the  performance  level of the cases was lower than
 that of the controls on nine  of the eleven  individual tests; however, the
                                  -50-

-------
Table 30.  Psychological  test score means, standard error of the difference
           of means, and the probability level of the analysis of variance
           test for the case-control comparison for the Halstead-Reitan
           Battery and the WAIS Battery.  Neuro-organophosphate Study,1979.
Variable

Neuropsychological Summary Scores

   Average Impairment Rating
   Hal stead Impairment Index
   WAIS Verbal IQ
   WAIS Performance IQ
   WAIS Full Scale IQ
Halstead-Reitan Battery

   Category
   Trails-B
   Speech Sounds Perception
   Seashore Rhythm
   Tactual Performance-Memory
   Tactual Performance-Location
   Tactual Performance-Time
   Finger Oscillation Test3
   Perceptual Disordersb
   Aphasia Exam0
   Spatial Relations0
 WAIS Subtest  Scaled  Scores

    Information
    Comprehension
    Arithmetic
    Similarities
    Digit  Span
    Vocabulary
    Digit  Symbol
    Picture Completion
    Block  Design
    Picture Arrangement
    Object Assembly
Means
S.E.    p-level*
Cases
1.07
0.30
105.40
108.41
107.05
39.55
75.31
7.78
26.65
7.62
4.57
13.07
100.80
4.68
5.59
2.81
10.73
11.32
11.15
11.10
9.80
10.49
9.71
11.13
11.24
10.02
10.60
Controls
0.91
0.23
111.86
110.13
111.77
31.57
67.72
5.92
27.16
7.78
4.45
11.88
103.69
4.17
4.55
2.71
11.83
12.13
12.40
12.09
10.95
11.68
10.64
11.00
11.75
9.95
10.72
                   .05
                   .03
                  1.31
                  1.46
                  1,32
                  2.59
                  4,09
                   .51
                   ,33
                   .17
                   .25
                   .77
                  1.41
                   .63
                   .58
                   ,13
                   .28
                   .34
                   .32
                   .31
                   .43
                   ,30
                   ,26
                   ,28
                   .38
                   ,35
                   .33
         <.001
          .020
         <-001
          .242
         <.001
          .002
          .067
          .001
          .120
           .125
           .042

           .075
           .001
           .020
           .001
           .002
           .008
           :.001
           :.001

           .187
 (a)  Scores summed  for  both hands
 (b)  Ratings defined  1n Russell  et al_. (1970)
 k    The  p-level  1s not shown 1f the F-ratio is less than unity.
                                   -51-

-------
Table 31.   Psychological  test score means, standard error of the difference
           of means,  and  the probability level  of the analysis of variance
           test for the case-control comparison for the Peabody Individual
           Achievement Test and Added Ability Tests.  Neuro-organophosphate
           Study, 1979.
Variable
Peabody Individual  Achievement Test

   Reading Recognition
   Reading Comprehension
   Spelling
   Means
                                          Cases   Controls
29.00
54.32
35.19
36.71
63.06
45.81
                   p-level*
2.32    .001
3.26    .008
3.65    .004
Added Ability Tests

   Tactile Form Recognition9
   Hand Dynamoneter
   Grooved Pegboard3
   Hole-Type Steadiness       b
   Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
   Thurstone Word Fluency-Total
   Word Finding Test0
   Story Memory Test-Learning
                    -Memory
20.34
96.87
148.34
59.39
17.07
43.92
36.04
1.87
.11
19.98
97.34
137.96
62.82
12.91
50.79
40.36
1.67
.10
                       ,75
                       ,93
                       ,26
                     6.76
                       .18
                       .33
                       .33
                       .02
                       .10
                    .002

                    .001
                    .003
                    .002
                    .045
(a)  Scores summed for both hands
 b)  Score available for 91 of 100 pairs
 c)  Score abaiTable for 99 of 100 pairs
     The p-level  is not shown if the F-ratio is less than  unity.
                                -52-

-------
 Table 32.  Psychological  test score means, standard error of the difference
            of means,  and  the  probability level  of the analysis of variance
            test for the case-control comparison for the MMPI Battery.
            Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
                                               Means
                             p-level*
 MMPI (T-Scores)

      Lie (L)
      Validity (F)
      Defensiveness (K)
      Hypochondriasis  (Hs)
      Depression (D)
      Hysteria (Hy)
      Psychopathic  Deviate  (Pd)
      Masculinity Femininity (Mf)
      Paranoia (Pa)
      Psychasthenia (Pt)
      Schizophrenia (Sc)
      Hypomania (Ma)
      Social  Introversion (Si)
                                          Cases
50.62
56.42
50.68
52.47
55.72
54.00
56.65
56.25
56.40
56.70
56.02
58.95
53.83
         Controls
49.30
53.36
54.79
52.94
54.28
57.12
56.41
55.97
54.00
55.32
53.45
57.21
50.65
1.04
1.25
1.23
1.40
1.57
1.21
1.45
1.23
1.21
1.47
1.57
1.32
1.30
.114
.008
.018

.202
.095
.027
.200**
.058**
.119
.050
 *The p-level  is  not shown if the F-ratio is less than unity.
**The p-level  for the F-test for interaction in the analysis of variance was
  significant  at the 5% level of significance.
                                 -53-

-------
difference between case  and control  means was  significant in only three of
these none tests.   When  compared to  their matched controls, the cases showed
impairment on tests of logical  analysis and abstract reasoning (Category Test),
fine discrimination among isolated speech sounds (Speech-Sounds Perception
Test), and motor speed with the  upper  extremities (Finger Oscillation Test);
although not statistically significant, the cases showed some impairment on
tests of efficiency in following sequential procedures (Trail Making Test, Part
B) and language skills (Aphasia  Exam).  There was no difference between the
two cohorts on the Sensory Perceptual  Examination.
     In general, both cohorts showed above average Intellectual functioning
on the WAIS.  However, the case  cohort obtained a mean Full Scale IQ that was
almost five points lower than the mean of the control cohort.  This difference
was highly significant (p <.001).  The case cohort also did significantly
worse than the controls  on all six verbal  subtests and on one of the five
performance subtests (Digit Symbol).
     The case cohort also performed at a significantly lower level than the
controls on the Reading  Recognition, Reading Comprehension, and Spelling sub-
tests of the Peabody Individual  Achievement Test.  Cohort differences were
also significant on five of the ten "added" ability tests:  tests of written
verbal fluency (Thurstone Word Fluency Test), verbal problem solving ability
(Word Finding Test), perserverative thinking  (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test),
fine motor coordination  with the upper extremities (Grooved Pegboard Test),
and learning (Story Memory Test-Learning).  The case and control cohorts did
not differ significantly in the test of memory (Story Memory Test-Memory).
     Although the mean  scores from  the MMPI are'well within normal  limits  for
both case and control  cohorts,  results of four of the thirteen scales were
statistically significant.  The differences on the Validity  (F) and Defen-
siveness (K) scales do not imply any  problems with the validity of either
                                 -54-

-------
 group's profiles, but they do suggest that the case participants were some-
 what more likely than the controls to report emotional problems on the MMPI.
 In addition, the case participants scored higher than the controls on the
 MMPI Paranoia and Social Introversion scales.  These findings suggest slightly
 greater social anxiety and tendencies towards suspiciousness and/or sensi-
 tivity to criticism or to other social stresses among the cases.
      Table 33 summarizes the results of the statistical comparisons between
 cohorts on the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory.  Significant
 cohort differences were obtained on 11 of the 32 items.  All of the signifi-
 cant differences indicated that the case cohort reported more problems with
 their everyday functioning than did their matched pair.
      It is also of interest that there appears to be some relationship between
 the specific problem areas mentioned in the self-reports completed by case
 participants and those cases shown to be most impaired on formal objective
 testing in the neuropsychological laboratory.  Thus, when compared to those
 of the controls, the patient assessment of own functioning  from the case
 cohort disclosed somewhat more difficulty with verbal comprehension, word
 finding abilities, reading and math skills, general problem solving, efficiency
 in following directions and instructions, and manipulatory  efficiency.   Further-
 more,  the  case cohort participant gave evidence of relative impairment  in  all
of these areas  of formal neuropsychological testing.  By contrast, there was
no difference between the case and control cohorts with respect to self-
assessments of  memory; this result agrees with.a similar result (i.e., no
significant difference)  in the formal  objective testing of  memory abilities.
The statistical  results  for each of 32 items used in the Patient Assessment of
Own Functioning Inventory are presented in detail in Appendix G.
                                 -55-

-------
           Table  33.  Patient's Assessment of (ton Functioning:  Test Score Means, Pooled Estimate of the Standard
                      Error (S.E.) of Each Mean, and Probability Level of the Analysis of Variance Test for the
                      Case Control Comparison.  Neuro-organophosphate Study, 1979.
in
en
i
Patient Self-Report:   Memory
For verbal communications 1n last day or two
For events occurring 1n last day or two
For people met 1n last day or two
For things known a year or more ago
For people met a year or more ago
Losing track of time
Forgetting what patient 1s doing
Forgetting how to do things
Losing things by forgetting where they are
Forgetting obligations

Patient Self-Report;  Language and Communication
Difficulties understanding speech of others
Difficulties recognizing printed or written words
Difficulties understanding reading material
Difficulties with enunciation
Difficulty thinking of names of things
Other word finding difficulties
Difficulty forming letters correctly
Difficulty spelling
                                                                               Means
Cases
1.95
1.22
1.46
1.93
1.91
1.43
.79
.90
1.98
1.31
Controls
1.77
1.06
1.30
2.04
1.98
1.40
.76
.72
1.95
1.37
S.E.
.10
.11
.14
.12
.13
.11
.10
.09
.11
.11
P- level
.210
.310
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.71
1.22
1.14
1.66
2.02
1.93
1.28
1.77
1.31
.80
.76
1.41
1.73
1.83
1.05
1.42
.11
.11
.12
.13
.10
.14
.13
.14
.014
.008
.024
.163
.037
-
.224
.071

-------
Patient Self-Report:  Use of Hands
Difficulty performing tasks with right hand
Difficulty performing tasks with left hand

Patient Self-Report:  Perceptual Functions
Difficulty feeling with right hand
Difficulty feeling with left hand
Difficulty with vision

Patient Self-Report;  Cognitive/Intellectual Functions
Thoughts seem confused or illogical
Distracted from what doing or saying
Confusion about where patient is
Difficulty finding way
Difficulty calculating
Difficulty planning and organizing activities
Difficulty solving problems
Difficulty following directions
Difficulty following instructions
                                                                    Means
Cases
.69
1.21
.26
.25
.81
.96
1.23
.51
.46
1.05
1.03
.96
.84
1.12
Controls
.29
1.29
.12
.27
.48
.90
1.01
.42
.48
.66
.85
.69
.54
.69
S.E.
.11
,14
.06
.06
.10
.10
.10
.09
.09
.10
.11
.09
.10
.10
P-level1
.010
-
.126
-
.019

.133
-
-
.009
.241
.036
.044
.004
*The  p-level  1s not given in cases for which the F-ratio is less than unity.

-------
     Results  of the  Relative Assessment of Patient Functioning Inventory showed
few significant differences between the case cohort and control  cohort (see
Table 34).   As  shown in Table 34, significant differences did occur on 4 of
30 items in the ability areas (p < .05).  All of the significant differences
measured by the relative's assessment showed that the case cohort had more
difficulty in functioning than the control cohort.  The difficulties were in
the general areas (language and communication, cognitive and intellectual
functions, and use of hands).  In addition, results of the relatives * assess-
ment of the study participants were significantly different between the case
and control cohorts on 4 of the 22 personality scale items:  depression, irri-
tability, social withdrawal, and confusion.  The statistical results of the
individual relative's assessment evaluations are presented in detail in
Appendix H.
      Blood Pesticide Residues  and  ChE  Assays.   Blood samples were taken from
each case  and  control  participant  at the time  of their physical  examination.
All  blood  samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticide residues  and for
cholinesterase depression.  The results from the residue analyses, reported in
 ppb, were  then totaled for each participant to give a single cumulative organo-
 chlorine pesticide residue value.   The logarithm of these cumulative residue
 values was statistically analyzed using the matched-pairs analysis of variance
 procedures (Table 35).  The mean residue value for the case cohort was 62.07
 ppb, which was significantly higher than the corresponding mean  value for the
 controls, 33.33 ppb.  DOT and its metabolite,  DDE, account for the large
 majority  of these residues.  As stated previously, 96% of the acute organo-
 phosphate exposures were occupationally related.   Since a wide spectrum of
 pesticides, especially the OP and organochlorine insecticides, is conroonly
 found  in  pesticide related occupations it is not surprising  that the mean
                                  -58-

-------
            Table  34.   Relative's Assessment of  Patient's  Functioning:  Test Score Means,  Pooled  Estimate of  the
                       Standard  Error  (S.E.) of  Each Mean, and  Probability  Level of  the Analysis  of  Variance
                       Test  for  the  Case-Control  Comparison.  Neuro-organophosphate  Study,  1979.
vo
I
Relative Rating:  Personality
Depression
Irritability
Seriousness
Withdrawal
Careless in appearance
Careless in activities
Suspidousness
Confusion about what 1s happening
Confusion about what he/she is doing
Indifference
Unpredictable and changeable in attitudes
Unpredictable and changeable in behavior
Inappropriate 1n social situations
Selfish
Upset by new problems
Upset by changes in plans
Demanding of others' attention
Dependent upon others
Dependability
Desirability as family member
                                                                               Means
Cases
2.04
2.15
2.64
1.74
1.05
1.27
1.66
1.03
.79
1.29
1.72
1.78
1.24
1.26
2.03
2.00
1.87
1.34
1.20
1.06
Controls
1.66
1.63
2.56
1.44
.88
1.17
1.45
.73
.67
1.16
1.50
1.44
1.23
1.36
1.78
1.88
1.87
1.26
1.04
.80
S.E.
.09
.11
.10
.11
.10
.11
.12
.10
.08
.09
.10
.10
.07
.11
.13
.13
.11
.11
.10
.11
P-level
.005
.001
-
.046
.150
-
.229
.036
.301
.287
.125
-
-
-
.175
-
„**
-
.280
.112

-------
o
i
           Relative Rating;  Personality (Continued)
           Appreciation by others
           Confabulation
Relative Rating;  Memory
For verbal communications in last day or two
For verbal communications a year or more ago
For events occurring 1n last day or two
For events occurlng a year or more ago
For people met 1n last day or two
For people met a year or more ago
Losing track of time
Forgetting what he/she 1s doing
Forgetting how to do things
Losing things by forgetting where they are
Forgetting obligations

Relative  Rating:  Language and Communication
Difficulties understanding speech of others
Difficulties recognizing printed or written words
Difficulties understanding reading material
Difficulties with enunciation
Difficulty thinking of names of things
Other word finding difficulties
                                                                               Means
Cases
.85
.77
1.54
1.46
.65
1.02
.42
.96
1.02
.51
.37
1.58
1.30
1.12
.79
.68
.79
1.10
.92
Controls
.84
.70
1.45
1.51
.58
1.07
.62
1.13
1.07
.56
.28
1.68
1.29
.78
.47
.50
.66
.78
.69
                                                                                      S.E.
                                                                                      .09
                                                                                      .12
          P-level*
.12
.14
.10
.11
.10
.11
.13
.10
.07
.15
.12
                                                                                                  .12
                                                                                                  .11
                                                                                                  .10
                                                                                                  .12
                                                                                                  .10
                                                                                                  .09
                                                                                                              .176
                                                                                                              .248
            .049
            .053
            .198

            .035
            .087

-------
Relative Rating:  Language and Communications (Cont'd)
Difficulties forming letters correctly when writing
Others have difficulty reading his/her writing
Difficulty spelling

Relative Rating;  Use of Hands
Difficulty performing tasks with right hand
Difficulty performing tasks with left hand

Relative Rating:  Cognitive/Intellectual  Functions
Thoughts seem confused or illogical
Distracted from what doing or saying
Confusion about where patient is
Difficulty finding way
Difficulty calculating
Difficulty planning and organizing activities
Difficulty solving problems
Difficulty following directions
Difficulty following instructions
                                                                    Means
Cases
.60
.70
1.52
.38
.43
.68
.44
.25
.34
.97
.85
.81
.52
.75
Controls
.41
.66
1.39
.29
.94
.40
.55
.20
'.24
.86
.81
.70
.60
.67
S.E.
.09
.13
.13
.10
.12
.09
.07
.08
.07
.11
.09
.07
.08
.06
P-level*
  .155
* The p-level 1s not given 1n cases for which the F-rat1o 1s  less  than  unity.
**The F-test for Interaction between exposure groups and states  is significant  at  the  5%  level.
  .003
  .028
  .297
  .274

-------
                               Table  35
                     Analysis of Variance Summary*
              with Subgroup Means and Standard Deviations
      for the Total Organochlorine Pesticide Residue in the Blood
Source of
Variation
Between Pairs
States
Error A
Within Pairs
Exposure
C+^^A 9 E**r*
btate & txp.
Error B
Degrees of
Freedom
-85.
1
84
86
1
1
I
84
Mean
Square F-ratio
—29
13.30 15.77
.84
.91
10. T3 12.63
-.. <•!
.74 
-------
blood residue levels of the persistent organochlorine pesticides were signifi-
cantly higher in the cases than in the controls.
     The Texas participants in both the control  and case cohorts had signifi-
cantly higher residue values than the Colorado participants.   This result
might be expected since previous studies have shown that the  body burden of
organochlorine pesticide residues in residents of southern states is signifi-
cantly greater than that of residents of northern states.
     One of the purposes of testing the cases and controls for ChE depression
was to determine if any of the participants showed evidence of exposure to
OPs at the time of examination in as much as some of the controls as well as
cases were in occupations where occupational or accidental exposure to OPs
was possible.
     Laboratory data on RBC and plasma ChE were statisitcally analyzed using
the matched-pairs analysis of variance procedure; the results are presented
in Tables 36 and 37, respectively.  As seen in Tables 36 and 37, both the
case and control cohorts were well above the lower limits of normal RBC ChE
and plasma ChE.  The approximate lower limits of normal  for the pH STAT method
are 8.0 yM/min/ml for RBC and 2.3 yM/min/ml for plasma.  The mean values for
plasma ChE for the control cohort was significantly lower than that for the
case control.
     Since the residue data showed a  statistically significant difference
between the  case and control cohorts, this  variable was  analyzed to determine
its potential influence on significant neurological findings.   In particular,
correlation  coefficients were computed between the five  most comprehensive
neuropsychological measurements  and  the organochlorine residue  level and  the
ChE levels.  As previously mentioned, on four of  these five neurospychological
measurements, the control cohort preformed  significantly better than  the
case cohort.  The correlation analysis, failed to show any significant
                                 -63-

-------
                              Table 36

                    Analysis of Variance  Summary
             with Subgroup Means and Standard  Deviations
                   for Red Blood Cell  Cholinesterase
Source of
Variation
Between Pairs
States
Error A
Within Pairs
Exposure
State & Exp.
Error B
Degrees of
Freedom
85
1
84
86
1
1
84
Mean
Square F- ratio
11.25
442.38 72.31
6.12
6.21
1.99 
-------
                              Table  37

                    Analysis of Variance Summary
             with Subgroup Means and Standard Deviations
                     for Plasma Cholinesterase
Source of
Variation
Between Pairs
States
Error A
Within Pairs
Exposure
State & Exp.
Error B
Degrees of
Freedom
85
1
84
8£
, 1
1
84
Mean
Square F- ratio
1.29
.55 
-------
association between organochlorine residue and any of the summary neuro-
psychological variables.  Thus, any assumptions of influence toward impaired
neuropsychological function from exposure to organochlorine pesticides were
not supported by these data.  Similarly, the correlations of the ChE levels
with the summary neuropsychological variables were not statistically signifi-
cant.  In fact, none of the correlation coefficients exceeded .25.

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
     A basic hypothesis of this research was that individuals with previous
documented acute organophosphate pesticide poisonings may experience latent
chronic neurological effects.  It should be emphasized that the study partici-
pants were not merely exposed to organophosphates, but they were made severely
ill by the exposure to the organophosphate.  The exposures were of such magni-
tude to require hospitalization in 78 per cent of the cases.  It should also
be emphasized that the mean number of days from post poisoning to neurological
testing was 2574 days.  This study was conducted by using matched-pairs to
compare a cohort of 100 previous organophosphate poisoning cases to a cohort
of 100 controls.  The matching characteristics included age, sex, race, ethnic
background, and social economic factors.  All participants and controls
came from the states of Colorado and Texas.  In the blind study design, each
study participant received a physical examination, neurological examination,
electroencephalogram (EEG), and neuropsychological testing.  Blood samples
were collected from each participant for analyses for organochlorine pesticide
residues and cholinesterase levels.  In addition, the blood samples were
evaluated for hematology, morphology, urea nitrogen and creatinine.  All
of the data obtained in this study were statistically analyzed using appropriate
matched-pairs analyses.
                                 -66-

-------
     The results of the physical examination revealed no significant differ-
ences between the case and control cohorts.  Evaluations of the blind phases
of this study revealed that the clinical EEG could not discriminate the case
cohort from the matched control cohort.  Previous investigators have indicated
an association between EEG changes and exposure to organophosphate compounds.
For example, Duffy et a]_. (13) reported on  the brain electrical activity of
workers exposed to sarin compared to that  of control subjects; statistically
significant group differences included increased beta activity, increased
delta and theta slowing, decreased alpha activity and increased amounts of
rapid eye movement during sleep in the exposed population.  -Duffy et al_. con-
cluded that their results, when considered with the long-term behavioral
effects of OP exposure, "provided parallel evidence that OP exposure could
produce long-term changes in brain function".  The EEG data obtained in this
study neither confirmed nor refuted these  findings;  whereas Duffy's results
were based on quantitative data derived from the power spectral analysis of
EEG's, the EEG data obtained in this study were clinically interpreted from
visual readings by the electroencephalographer.  (As mentioned previously,
the computer breakdown at the University of Colorado Medical Center prevented
the use of digitized spectral analyses of  the EEG's).
      However, this  study found  that some  neurological deficiencies  (e.g.,
mental status exam  and  peripheral  sensory findings) occurred more frequently
in the case participants.  Although only  a few of the differences between  the
two cohorts in the  neurological examination were significant,  several  major
differences between the case and control cohorts were found through the
neuropsychological evaluations.  Each of the five summary scores and each
of the 34 subtest scores from the neuropsychological examination was analyzed
using a matched-pairs analysis of variance procedure to determine the
                                     -67-

-------
statistical significance for the difference between the case and control
cohorts.  In summary of the neuropsychological results, it was found that
the participants in the case cohort were significantly worse than the controls
on four of five summary measures  and on 18 of 34 individual subtest scores
used in the study.  The differences occurred on tests of widely varying
abilities, including intellectual functioning, academic skills, abstraction
and flexibility of thinking, and simple motor skills (speed and coordination).
The case cohort did not perform significantly better than the control cohort
on any of the subtests.
     A total of 24% of the case cohorts obtained Halstead-Reitan Battery
summary scores in the range that strongly suggested cerebral damage or
dysfunction, whereas only 12% of the controls performed at the same level
on these tests.  Based on the matched-pairs chi-square test, this difference
in proportions between the case and control cohorts was statistically signifi-
cant (p <.05).  It should be noted that the Halstead-Reitan Battery is the
most comprehensive and best validated neuropsychological test battery
currently available.  In contains a number of tests, because it was designed
to measure a wide range of adaptive abilities that can be affected by brain
lesions involving various cerebral locations.  Considering the complexity of
the brain and the behaviors it subserves, the use of two or three tests of
"organicity" in this study would have been inadequate.  There are two summary
measures from this battery that are more sensitive to brain lesions than are
any of the individual tests (the Halstead Impairment Index and the Average
Impairment Rating).  The pesticide poisoned subjects did significantly worse
than the controls on both of these measures.  It should be noted that both
cohorts showed above average intellectual functioning on the WAIS Battery.
                                 -68-

-------
     The overall difference between the case cohort and the cohort of matched
controls was further evaluated by analyzing simultaneously all 34 subtest
scores in the neuropsychological evaluation.  This analysis (a multivariate
analysis of variance procedure for matched-pairs designs) found the total
difference between the two cohorts to be highly significant (p = .0076).
Furthermore, the lack of significance in the statistical test for "Inter-
action" in the multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that the differ-
ence between the case and control cohorts was consistent for the study cohort
subgroups (i.e., Colorado and Texas).  The subtests from each battery of
neuropsychological tests (i.e., WAIS, Halstead-Reitan, Peabody, and Added
Ability Tests) were also analyzed simultaneously using the same multivariate
analysis of variance procedure.  For each battery of tests, the difference
between the case and control cohorts was statistically significant (the
p-levels for the above four batteries were .0001, .0311, .0066, and .0055,
respectively).  For each battery, this difference between case and control
cohorts was consistent for the two study subgroups from Colorado and Texas.
     Results from the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory were
similar to the findings of the objective neuropsychological testing.  In the
Patient Assessments, the difference between case and control cohorts was
significant with respect to everyday functioning on 10 of 32 aspects of
language and communication, memory, cognitive intellectual functions, and
perceptual functions.  The case participants also demonstrated significantly
lower abilities in the same subject areas on objective testing as they did
on the Patient Assessment Inventory.
     Results from the inventory of Relative's Assessment of Patient Function-
ing showed fewer significant differences between the case and control cohorts
than either the objective neuropsychological testing or the Patient Assess-
ment of Own Functioning Inventory.  The Relative's Assessment showed the case
                                  -69-

-------
cohort  to  have  significantly more problems on four of 22 personality scale
items:  depression  (p  =  .005);  irritability  (p =  .001); confusion about what
is happening  (p =  .036); withdrawal  (p =  .046).   Based on the relative's
assessment the  case cohort was  found to have significantly more difficulties
in understanding speech  of others   (p = .049) and in thinking of names of
things  (p  = .035).
     MacMahon (51) has noted that,  in the absence of experimental data,
three types of  considerations are useful  in distinguishing between epidemi-
olgical associations that are causal and those that are secondary.  These
include time sequence, strength of  association between two events, and
consonance with existing knowledge.
     Since the  study was designed to investigate  the chronic effects that
might be associated with a previous acute organophosphate pesticide (OP)
poisoning, the  study purposely  included those cases that had experienced
severe OP  intoxications.  In particular, the study design for this research
included only cases that had experienced an organophosphate poisoning of
such severity to usually require hospitalization.  The time lapse from the
poisoning  experiences  to neurological examination ranged from 117 days for
one case to 9640 days  with the  mean time  lapse being 2574 days.  To make
certain that study participatants had not experienced recent OP exposures,
blood samples were collected and anlayzed for cholinesterase depression.
     With  respect to the strength of association  between acute organophosphate
pesticide  poisoning and neuropsychological deficits, one might reasonably
expect the greater the dose the greater the neurological deficit — this is,
assuming the degree of neuropsychological deficits to be related to the dose
(concentration, route of exposure,  toxicity) at the time of the OP poisoning
experience.  Because of the lack of specific dose-type data, the study was
                                 -70-

-------
unable to relate degree of OP poisoning severity to the degree of neuro-
phychological deficit.  However, the strength of the association between
acute organophosphate exposure and neuropsychological deficits is reflected,
not only in the number of statistically significant differences between the
exposed and control cohorts, but more importantly in the consistency of
these significant differences.
     Obviously, in any epidemiologic study of this type, there is the potential
for several confounding variables, including multiple exposures to low levels
of OP compounds and other pesticides.  In addition, there was a variation in
the length of the latent induction period prior to the neuropsychological
evaluations.  There is also the question of the exact type of cerebral lesions
in the exposed population.  For example, does the pattern of deficits resemble
diffuse arteriosclerosis, lead encephalopathy, or other diseases?  It should
be emphasized that there is some danger of overinterpreting patterns of
group mean scores on neuropsychological test batteries, because this fre-
quently implies more consistency than actually exists among the individual
subjects in the group.  Some research on use of the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (MMPI) has been criticized on  this basis.  Also since
no consistently focal or lateralized brain changes were expected in the poi-
soned group, the research design did not concentrate on looking for specific
patterns of deficits among the cases.  For example,  although one might postulate
that the case group data would include more  involvement of the frontal areas
than of the other cerebral areas this would  probably be an overinterpretation
of the results.  The pattern of results on the WAIS  battery, such as the
greater group differences on Verbal than on  Performance subtests, introduces
the potential confounding variable of control selection.  Although one might
argue that an Inadvertent bias in the selection of study controls could  account
                                  -71-

-------
for the observed group differences on the WAIS,  a selection bias of this
nature would not account for the greater number  of poisoned subjects scoring
in the brain damaged range on the Halstead-Reitan Battery.
     It might be argued that residual effects from cerebral anoxia due
to organophosphate poisoning may cause the observed neuropsychological
differences.  However, selection criteria were designed to  eliminate both
cases-and controls who were known to be unconscious for a significant period
of time (more than 15 minutes) in his or her lifetime, regardless of the cause.
In addition, the selection criteria eliminated any subjects whose medical
history included any disease that might adversely influence the neurological
and neuropsychological testing.  In particular,  the subject screening procedures
excluded any subjects who had a past history of  neurological illness, signfi-
cant head trauma, or substance abuse.
     The neurological and neuropsychological evaluations are obviously comple-
mentary in that each emphasizes different aspects of dysfunction.  The
clinical neurological examinations focus primarily on sensory and motor
functioning with very little attention to the higher level  cognitive and
intellectual functions that are very sensitively assessed  by the neuropsy-
chological procedures.  Both examinations found no differences  between the
case and control cohort participants with respect to sensory-perceptual
functioning.  The neuropsychological exam found some mild  impairment  of
fine coordination and motor speed with the  upper extremities in the case
cohort.  The major neuropsychological differences between  case  and  control
cohorts appeared on  tests of abilities that receive limited evaluation  in
the clinical neurological examination.   The two methods  of evaluation,  taken
together, thus  provide a more  complete evaluation of  brain function not
possible utilizing either examination alone.  Hopefully future research will
                                  -72-

-------
help to further elucidate the important interrelationships {person-place-
time chemical) between acute organophosphate exposure and chronic neuro-
psychological health effects.

-------
REFERENCES

 1.  Expert Committee on Insecticides.   Safe Use of Pesticides.   20th  Report,
     WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 513, World Health Organization,  1973.   p.  42.

 2.  Colorado Epidemiologic Pesticide Studies Center.  A Study of Hospitalized
     Acute Pesticide Poisonings in the United States, 1971-1973.  Colorado
     State University, Fort Collins,  Colorado, 1975.   p. 32.

 3.  Durham, W.F. and W.J. Hayes, Jr.  Organic Phosphorus Poisoning  and-Its
     Therapy.  Arch. Environ. Health  5:21-53, 1962.

 4.  Murphy, S.D.  Pesticides.  In:  Toxicology - The Basic Science  of Poisons,
     L.  J. Casarett and J. Doull, eds~MacMillian Publishing Co., Inc.,  New
     York, 1975.   p. 424.

 5.  Hunter, D.  The Diseases of Occupations.  English University Press,
     London, England, 1975.  pp. 368-377.

 6.  Bidstrup, P.L., J.A. Bonnell, and A.G. Beckett.   Paralysis  Following
     Poisoning by a New Organic Phosphorus Insecticide (Mipafox). Brit.
     Med. 0. 1:1063-1072, 1953.

 7.  Gershon, S.  and F.H. Shaw.  Psychiatric Sequelae of Chronic Exposure to
     Organophosphorus Insecticides.  Lancet 1:1371-1374, 1961.

 8.  Dille, J.R.  and P.M. Smith.  Central  Nervous System Effects  of  Chronic
     Exposure to Organophosphate Insecticides.  Aerosp. Med.  35:475-475,  1964.

 9.  Drenth, H.J.  Neuromuscular Function in Agricultural Workers Using
     Pesticides.   Arch. Environ. Health 25:395-398, 1972.

10.  Grob, D. and A.M. Harvey.  The Effects and Treatment of  Nerve Gas
     Poisoning.  Amer. J. Med. 14:52-63, 1953.

11.  Brown, H.W.   Electroencephalographic Changes and Disturbance of Brain
     Function Following Human Organophosphate Exposure.  Northwest Med. 70:
     845-846, 1971.

12.  Metcalf, D.R. and J.H. Holmes.  EEG, Psychological and Neurological
     Alterations in Humans with Organophosphorus Exposure.  Ann. N.Y.  Acad.
     Sci. 160:357-365, 1969.

13.  Duffy, F.H., J.L. Burchfiel,  P.H. Bartels, M. Gaon, and V.M. Sim.
     Long-Term Effects of an Organophosphate upon the Human Electoencephalogram.
     Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 47:161-176, 1979.

14.  Barnes, J.M.  (Letter).  Lancet 2:102-103, 1961.

15.  Bidstrup, P.L.   (Letter).  Lancet 2:103, 1961.

16.  Stroller, A., J. Krupinski, A.J. Christophers, and A.K.  Blanks.  Organo-
     phosphorus  Insecticide and Major Mental Illness.  Lancet 1:1387-1388,  1965,
                                 -74-

-------
17.  Tabershaw,  I.R.  and W.C.  Cooper.  Sequelae of Acute Organic  Phosphate
     Poisoning.  J. Occ. Med.  8:5-10, 1966.

18.  Clark, G.   Organophosphate  Insecticides and Behavior, a Review
     Aerospace Med. 42:735-740,  1971.

19.  Holmes, J.H., Clinical  Studies of Exposure to the Organophosphorus
     Insecticides.  In:  Research in Pesticides.  C.O. Chichester, ed
     Academic Press,  New York, 1965. p. 315-327.

20.  Savage, E.P., Bagby, J.R. ,  Jr., Mounce, L.M. , Williams, L.P., Jr.,
     Cholas, G.:  Pesticide  Poisonings in Rural Colorado.  Rocky Mt.
     Medical Journal, April  1971.


21.  Gallaher, G.L.   "Low Volume" Insect Control and Parathion Poisoning.
     Texas Med. 63:39, 1967.

22.  Hatcher, R.L. and J.S. Wiseman.  Epidemiology of Pesticide Poisoning
     in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in 1968.  Texas Med.  65:40-43, 1969.

23.  Hollingshead, A.B.  The Two Factor Index of Social Position.   Mimeo
     Yale University, New Haven.


24.  Wechsler, D.  Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.   The
     Psychological Corporation, New York,  1955. -   -

25.  Halstead, W.C.  Brain and Intelligence:  A Quantitative  Study of the
     Frontal Lobes.  University of Chicago Press,  Chicago,  1947.   -

26.  A Research Program on the Psychological Effects  of Brain Lesions in
     Human Beings.  In:  International  Review of Research in  Mental
     Retardation, N.R. Ellis, ed.  Academic Press,  New York,  1966.

27.  Reitan, R.M. and L.A.  Davidson (ed.).   Clinical  NeuropsvcholoQv
     Current Status and Applications.   Wi 1 ey' & Sons,  New  York,  1974.

28.  Russell, E.W., C. Neuringer, and  G. Goldstein.   Assessment of Brain
     Damage:  A Neuropsychological  Key  Approach.  Wiley-Interscience, New
29.  Matarazzo, J.D.   Wechsler's Measurement and  Appraisal  of Adult  Intel li-
     gence.   Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,  1972.   - ~" -

30.  Heaton,  R.K.   (Private Publication)   Manual  for Administration  of Neuro-
     psychological  Test Batteries for  Adults  and  Children.  Indian^rnr; —


31.  Saetveit,  J.G.,  D. Lewis,  and C.E. Seashore.  Revision of the Seashore
     Measure  of Musical Talents.   University  of Iowa Press, Iowa City, 1940.

32.  Armitage,  S.G.   An Analysis  of Certain Psychological Tests Used for
     the Evaluation of Brain Injury.   Psychol. Monogr. 60:1,  1946.

33.  Wheeler, L. and  R.M.  Reitan.   The Presence and Lateral ity of Brain
     Damage Predicted from Responses to a Short Sphasia Screening Test
     Percept. Mot. Skills  15:783,  1962.

                                 -75-

-------
34.  Halstead, W.C. and J.M. Wepman.  The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening
     Test.  J. Speech Hearing Dis. 14:9, 1949.

35.  Dunn, L.M. and S.C. Markwardt, Jr.  Peabody Individual Achievement Test
     Manual.  American Guidances Service, Circle Pines, Minnesota, 1970.

35   Thurstone, L.L.  Primary Mental Abilities.  University of Chicago Press,
     Chicago, 111., 1938.

37   Reitan, R.M.  Verbal Problem Solving as Related to Cerebral Damage.
     Percept. Mot. Skills 34:515-524, 1972.

38.  Berg, E.A.  A Simple Objective Technique for Measuring Flexibility in
     Thinking.  J. Gen. Psycho!. 39:15-22, 1948.

39.  Grant, D.A. and E.A. Berg.  A Behavioral Analysis of Degree of Reinforce-
     ment and Ease of Shifting to New Responses in a Weigl-Type Card-Sorting
     Problem.  J. Exp. Psycho!. 38:404-411,  1948.

40.  Reitan, R.M.  Unpublished Test Modified by R.K. Heaton,  University of
     Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

41.  Hathaway, S.R. and J.C. McKinley.  The MMPI Manual.  The Psychological
     Corporation, New York, 1951.

42.  Dahlstrom, W.G., G.S. Welsch, and  I.E.  Dahlstrom.  An MMPI Handbook,
     Vol. 1: Clinical Interpretation.   University of Minnesota Press,
     Minneapolis, 1972.

43.  An MMPI Handbook, Vol. II: Research Application.  University of
     Minnesota Press, Minneapolis,  1975.

44.  Winer, B.J.  Statistical Principles in  Experimental Design.  McGraw Hill
     Book Company, New York, 1962.  pp.  191-195.

45   Fleiss, J.L.  Statistical Methods  for Rates and Proportions.  John Wiley
     & Sons, New York, 1973.  pp. 72-80.

46   Stuart, A.  A Test for Homogeneity of the Marginal Distribution in a
     Two-Way Classification.  Biometrika 42:412-416, 1955.

47   Morrison, D.F.  Multivariate Statistical Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book
     Co., New York, 1967T

48.  Milner, B.  Some Effects of Frontal Lobectomy in Man.  In:  Frontal
     Granular Cortex and Behavior, J.M. Warren and K. Akert, eds.  McGraw-
     H111, New York, 1964.

49-  Drewe, E.A.  The Effect of Type and Area of Brain Lesion on Wisconsin
     Card Sorting Test Performance.  Cortex  10:159-170, 1974.

50-  Wechsler, D.E.  A Standardized Memory Scale for Clinical Use.  J.
     Psycho!. 19:89-95, 1945.

 51.   MacMahon,  B.  and Thomas,  F.P.   Epidemiology Principles and Methods.
      Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1970.
                                  -76-

-------