EPA -330/1 -89-001
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING
SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION X
February 1989
National Enforcement Investigations Center, Denver
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Enforcement
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
EPA-330/1 -89-001
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING
OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION X
February 1989
Joel K. Mattern
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Denver, Colorado
-------
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODS 2
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA) 2
SITE CONTAMINATION (CERCLA) .• 5
WASTE WATER DISCHARGES (CWA) 6
TOXIC SUBSTANCES INCLUDING PCB STORAGE AND USE
(TSCA) 7
AIR EMISSIONS (CM) 7
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA) 8
RESULTS 9
TABLES
1 Facility Rating Criteria 4
2 Facility Ratings (by ranking) 10
3 Facility Ratings (by State) 14
-------
INTRODUCTION
EPA Region X, in November 1988, requested that the National
Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC) rank Federal facilities according to
their relative potential for havi ng environmental problems.’ These facilities are
ranked with a Multi-Media Priority Ranking Model developed by NEIC using
information available from the various EPA databases and Region files. The
Region will use theserankings to assist them in identifying facilities for multi-
media inspections.
Facilities are ranked according to the type and magnitude of activities in
•the various media which actually, or potentially could result in environmental
contamination. These activities include past and present hazardous waste”
generation an d management, wastewater discharges, air emissions and
hazardous and toxi materials handling and storage. Keeping with agency
priorities, emphasis is placed on the potential environmental problems
associated with hazardous waste management activities.
To ensure timely and consistent rankings, facilities are ranked using only
information which is readily accessible and available for all or most
installations. The major information sources are the various EPA computer
databases and Region file data. To avoid bias, information available for only a
few facilities (e.g., specific site inspection reports) is not used in the ranking
process. In addition, facility compliance data isn’t used because of the dynamic
nature of such information.’
The ranking model does not compare a facility rating with any fixed
number to indicate whether the installation is environmentally “good” or “bad.”
Rather, the rating provides an indication of whether that facility has the potential,
relative to other installations, for having major environmental problems (i.e., the
higher the rating the greater the potential for environmental problems). Thus, a
high rating indicates that a facility has. a high potential for environmental
problems and further evaluation may be warranted.
Environmental problems, as generally used here, are directly related to the release of
contaminants . the environment.
As defined in 40 CFR 261
Specific facility information and recent compliance data would be used as part of a detailed
follow-up evaluation of a facility.
-------
2
METHODS
Region X selected the facilities to be prioritized from the Federal facilities
listed in EPA ’s computerized Facilities Index System (FINDS). The FINDS
database contains approximately 675 Region X Federal installations with:
(1) known or suspected hazardous waste disposal sites (active and inactive),
(2) Resource.Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit application or
permits on file with EPA, (3) National Pollutant Discharge Etimination System
(NPDES) permits, and/or (4) air emission point sources. Of these, the Region
selected 43 for prioritization.
Selected facilities are ranked based on the type and relative level of
activity in th following six categories:
• Hazardous waste management
• Site contamination (known and potential)
• Wastewater discharges
• Toxic substances, including polychiorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Air emissions
• Drinking water supplies
The above categories generally reflect pertinent activities regulated by
one or more of six environmental statutes: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensationj
and Liability Act (CERCLA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA), the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),
respectively. An explanation on how facilities are ranked, in each category
follows.
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT ( RCRA) ’
This category ranks facilities according to the potential for environmental
contamination through hazardous waste generation and management. For
ratiAg purposes, the category is divided into four activity subcategories:
(1) Hazardous waste quantity generated, (2) waste storage design capacity,
(3) waste treatment design capacity, and (4) waste disposal design capacity.
-------
3
These general subcategories are used because this information is readily
available and covers a wide range of hazardous waste management aàtivities.
The major information source for this category is the EPA Hazardous
Waste Data Management System (HWDMS), a computer database which
includes information submitted by hazardous waste generation and/or handling
facIlities as part Qf RCRA Part A and/or Part B permit applications. The data
includes hazardous waste quantities and types generated, types of hazardous
waste handling activity and waste processes design capadties. Information is
obtained from Region RCRA files if the computer database is incomplete.
The minimum rating for any facility generating hazardous waste is 3
[ Table 1). This accounts for activities involving actual generation and any short
term or small quantity management of waste. Generating facilities with RCRA
storage, treatment or disposal activities are rated according to the relative level
of activity in each subcategory. An additional rating point is assigned to these
faôilities to account for potential problems involved in the actual waste
generating process(es). Also, facilities which treat, store, or dispose of
hazardous waste in a surface impoundment are assigned an additional
subcategory rating point to account for the enhanced contamination potential
attributed to using impoundments. Facilities which dispose hazardous waste
using underground injection wells are assigned two additional subcategory
rating points.
Subcategory ratings and any additional rating points are combined to
provide the overall rating for each facility for “Hazardous Waste Management”
[ Tables 2 (overall facility ranking) and 3 (facility ranking within each state)]. For
example, a facility generating 12 metric tons of hazardous waste annually,
having 10,000 gallons of container storage capacity and 1,000 gallons per day
tank treatment capacity, using the rating criteria [ Table 1], receives 2 rating
points for waste quantity generated, 2 points for storage, 2 points for treatment
and 1 point for being both a waste generator and TSD facility [ Table 1,
footnote ijor 7.points total for hazardous waste management. This ranking
indicates the relative potential to contaminate the environment through
hazardous waste management.
-------
Table 1
FACILITY RATING CRITERIA
F dousWas1eManaiemer1 t
S Contarr nabon
Quanhty Storage Treatment Disposal Capacity
Soil/Water Bulk Storage
Contarni- o Hazardous
Generaled Capacity Capacity Landfill Land Applicatâon
Rating (m tons/Year) (gaL) (gaiiday) (acres-ft.) (acres)
Seriousness nation Materiai
0 0 0 0 0 0
No 2 No 2 No 2
1 <12 <10,000 <1,000 - -
-
•
2 12-50 10,000- 1;000- - -
100,000 50.000
3 50-500 >100,000 >50,000 50,000 - - -
NPL 4 Known 5 -
Toxic
Wastewater Discharges 6 Substances
Flow SIC 7 Suspected Number of Criteria
Rate Toxicity Toxic PCI3 Pollutants 8 Discharged
Water
ArEm ons Supplies
Discharge to Suspected Hazardous No. of
Nonaltainmeni Air Pollutant 9 Persons
Rating (mgd) Group Discharge Use at 100 Tons Per ‘lear
Areas Discharges Supplied
0 No 2 <3 No 2 No 2 No 2
No 2 No 2 No 2
1 - - - 010
- - <1000
2 <.5 - Suspected 3 Suspected 3 I
- . i000
3 .5-1.5 3 Known - 2
111 -
4 1.5-2.5 - - Known .2
2 Yes -
5 >2.5 - - - -
>2 -
1. The minimum rating for any facility generating hazardous waste, regardless of any storage, treatment or disposal activities is 3. Facilities with
RCRA storage. treatment and/or disposal activities are assigned subcategot-y ratings, as indicated in the table. An additional p01111 is added to
factlities If they are both a gwerato and TSD (see texI). Facilities wi ich treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste in a surface irr ooundment
are assigned an additional point (see text). Facilities which dispose hazardous waste using underground injection wells are assigned two
additional points.
2. - No ki,own suspected activity in this activity category v subcategory
3. Suspected means that !nlormalion suggests nonspecific activity in the subcategory.
4. NPL means the facility is Nsted or has been proposed lot listing on the National Priorities List.
5. Facilities Huh known oipotentiai contamination of thinking water supplies are assigned two additional rating pints (total of 7).
6. Includes known discharges to muniapoi wastewater treatment plants.
7. SIC Toxicity Group (a number frOm I (lowest) to 5(highast)j is an indication of potentially harmful health effects related to a specihc Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code (see text).
8. As defined in 40 CFR 50
9. Hazardous air pollutant (40 CFR 61) emission sources with or without other air sources
10. Facility has point source emissions but does not have the potential to discharge at 100 tons per year per pollutant.
11. Facility discharges one non attainment pollutant in nonattainment area for that pollutant.
12. Facility discharges two nonattainment pollutants in nonattainment area toi those pollutants.
-------
5
SITE CONTAMINATION (INCLUDING CERCLAI
This category ranks facilities according to the actual, suspected or
potential for site contamination from either past operations or the present bulk
storage of hazardous materials (acids, fuel oil, gasoline, etc). The category is
divided into three activity subcategories: (1) Seriousness of site contaminat on
problems, (2). contamination of soil and water, and (3) bulk storage of
hazardous materials.
Information was obtained from the following EPA computer data bases:
FINDS, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Information System (CERCLIS), Compliance Data System (CDS) and the
Federal Facility Compliance Docket. Region file information supplemented this
data. FINDS lists all known or suspected facility sites which were contaminated
from past activities. CERCLIS tracks these sites and identifies those which are
proposed for, or listed on, the National Priority List (NPL). Region files contain
reports of any EPA/State or Department of Defense site investigations (such as
preliminary assessments) for the suspected CERCLA sites. Preliminary
Assessment and Installation Restoration Program reports rate the “seriousness”
at site problems as low, medium or high and, if known, indicate the type of site
contamination (soil, water). CDS lists installations with bulk storage facilities for
hazardous materials (fuel oil, gasoline) through its inventory of volatile organic
air emissions.
Rating points are assigned to each facility for activity in each of the three
subcategories using Table 1. Facilities with known contamination of drinking
water supplies are assigned two additional rating points. The sum of these
ratings is the facility’s overall rating for “Site Contamination” and is presented in
Tables 2 and 3. An overall rating of 2 indicates that there is no known or
suspected site contamination, but there is the potential for contamination due to
onsite bulk storage of hazardous materials.
Even though the handling of bulk quantities of hazardous materials may not be covered
under CERCLA, it is included here because of its potential for site contamination.
-------
6
Results of preliminary assessments or other site evaluations were not
available for all facilities identified as having known or suspected’ site
contamination. Subcategory ratings of 3 for “seriousness’ and 2 for “soil/water
contamination” are assigned to such facilities with limited or no specific site
information to account for the unknown potential for problems in these
subcategories [ Table 1].
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES (CWA
This category rates facilities according to the actual or potential impacts
of wastewater discharges into receiving waters. The three subcategories used
to rate facility activity in this category are: (1) average daily flow rate; (2) the
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) ’ code for the facility’s waste generating
activities and general wastewater type (industriaL sanitary, or both); and
(3) suspected discharge of toxic wastewater.
Information on the type and flow rate of wástewater discharges was
obtained from the Permit Compliance System (PCS) and Region NPDES files.
SIC codes and toxic discharge information for each facility are from the EPA
databases and/or Region files. SIC codes are used to assign each facility to a
S 1C.toxicity group. Each SIC toxicity group from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)
correlates to the potential for harmful effects from wastewater discharges from a
specific industry (as identified by the SIC code). The SIC Code/Toxic Pollutant
Discharge Potential component of the NPDES permit ranking system.used by
EPA nationally to classify dischargers as “major” or “minor,” is used to assign a
SIC toxicity group to wastewater discharge facilities being ranked.
In cases where SIC codes are not readily available for all installations
rated, Region file information regarding facility operations and waste generation
is used to determine an appropriate SIC toxicity group. SIC toxicity group
classification is’ used to help characterize wastewater discharge in lieu of
specific information regarding wastewater characteristics. Also, facilities known
* Suspected as’ a result of being included in the CERCLIS computer database or the Federal
Faality Compliance Docket
The SIC is a number which describes an industr ’ by the type of activity in which it is
engaged.
-------
7
or suspected of discharging toxic wastewater are assigned additional rating
points. Flow rates, general wastewater type, SIC toxicity group number, and
suspected discharge of toxic wastewater are used as shown in Table 1 to
assign ratings to each facility in each subcategory. Subcategory ratings are
totated to obtain the wastewater discharge ratings presented for each facility in
Tables 2 and 3. V
TOXIC SUBSTANCES INCLUDING PCB STORAGE AND USE (TSCA )
This category rates facilities according to information regarding use of
PCBs. Information sources used to identify facilities storing/using these
compounds included: HWDMS, FINDS and Region files (including the A-106
database). Facilities are rated according to Table 1. Department of Defense
facilities with no specific information regarding PCBs are assigned a rating point
of 2 for this category. This is because general information indicates that most
military installations handle PCBs and, therefore, PCB use is “suspected.” V
Category ratings for each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
AIR EMISSIONS (CAA
This category rates facilities according to: (1) the number of criteria air
pollutants (particulates, nitrous oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, and
volatile organic carbon) emitted through point sources; (2) emissions of
hazardous pollutants; and (3) emission of pollutants into nonattainment areas,
as shown in Table 1. The 100-tons-per-year rate for criteria air pollutants is
used in the rating because that is the emission rate normally used to
differentiate between major and minor point air emission sources. Facilities
with point air emission sources, whicñ do not have the potential to emit any
criteria pollutants at greater than or equal to 100 tons per year, were given a
ranking of 1 for that subcategory. Additional ranking points are assigned
facilities which discharge hazardous air pollutants and/or emit nonattairiment
pollutants into nonattainment air .quality control regions for that pollutant. No
attempt is made to incorporate fugitive emissions into the rating system.
Informationon emission rates is obtained from the Compliance Data
System (COS), an EPA computer database containing information on permitted
-------
8
point air emission sources and Region files. Facilities are rated quantitatively
according to Table 1. Results for each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
SAFE DRINKING WATER AC1(SDWA )
This category rates a facility’s potential impact according to: (1) whether
it handles its own drinking water supplies, and (2) the size of the population
served by the facility. Information is obtained from the Federal Reporting Data
System (FADS), Public Water Source data. Table 1 identifies how the rating
points are assigned.
-------
9
RESULTS
The selected Federal facilities are listed in decreasing order of their
overall potential for environmental problems, as identified by the Multi-Media
Priority Ranking Model (Table 21. These same facilities are also listed in
decreasing order of their overall potential for environmental problems by State
Tabie 3]. The. rankings are not only useful in identifying the facilities with the
highest potential for environmental problems, but also show those activities
which need to be emphasized during inspections.
As previously stated, the facility rating was not designed to be compared
to a fixed number to indicate whether an installation is environmentally “good”
or “bad. TM Rather, the rating provides an indication of whether that facility, has the
potential, relative to other installations, for having major environmental prob-
lems. A high total rating indicates that, based on the type and level of onsite
activities, a facility has a high probability of having environmental probtems. It
also indicates a more detailed evaluation of the facility is warranted.
This ranking only provides an initial evaluation, of the selected facility,
based on available information, and. should be supplemented by a more
detailed analysis of Region files which includes a review of compliance status
prior to any onsite investigations. .
-------
TAZLE2 10
FACILITY RATING BY RANXING
cILrrY HAZARDOUS SIT! POINT DRINIING POINT
o zss WASTE CON’rAfl— WAST!WATER TOXIC WATER AIR
NO. CITY MANAGEMENT INATION DISCHARGES SUBSTANCES SUffLY CSS
0RS213820917 USABIC( — UNATIIJJ 1 DEPOT 19 14 6 4 1 4
1-84, Exit 178
Kerniston, OR
WA7890008967 USD0! HANFORD SITE 18 14 8 4 1 3
Sanford Site
Rinbiand, WA
AX8570028649 USA? — ELMENDORF Afl 10 13 8 4 2 9
Elnandort AYE
Anchorage,: AX.
104890008952 USD0! IEI.N0 NA! ENGINEZRNG LAB 11 13 7 4 2 8
kto ic Energy Co testing Rae
Scoville, ID
NA3570024200 USA? — I4CCEORD APE 6 14 4 2 8 43
1-5 Exit 127
Tac a, WA
NA9214053465 USAP - TOP! LEWIS 10 14 8 4 2 4 42
1-5 Exit 120
Port Levis, WA.
KA2170023418 US! - PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYD 8 11 11 4 0 - 6 40
let St:et
Bxeaerton, WA
W19571924647 USA! — FIJRCNIW AYE 7 14 6 4 2 7 43
Bwy 2, West of
Spokane,
WA5170027291 US! — BB G0R SU BXSE EASE 10 14 6 4 2 4 40
Clear Cresk Road
Bangor,
WA1170023419 US!— UNDERSEA WARFARE GSTA 9 14 8 4 1 4 40
Bvy3O8 !astEnd
Xeyport, WA
AX6210022426 USAP I! — FOP! WAINWRIGET 6 13 6 4 2 9 43
Richardson Ewy SE of
Fairbanks, BA
A1Ui10022157 UWME - TOP! RICHARDSON 7 12 5 4 2 9 3
Glenn !wy& Valley Road
Anchorage A K
-------
TABLE 2 (corit.) 11
EP A FACILITY HAZAP. OUS SIT! POINT DRINKING POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONTA14- WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR
NO, CITY MANAGZ €NT INATI DISCMARGES SUBSTANCES SUPPLY SS J NG
AX1570028646 USA! — EIZLSON ATh 9 13 6 4 2 4 33
Hwy 2, 16 miS ! of
Fairbanks, AX
WA9170023361 USN - WEDS!! IS lAND .IR 5Th 6 14 8 4 0 4
Hwy 20 & A ilt Field Road
Oak Harbor, WA
AX3210022155 USAP) — FOR! GREELY 4 12 6 4 2 6 24
Richardson Hwy, 1 mi south of
Delta Junction, AK
1D3572124557 USAI — MOUNTAIN E MB 4 13 5 4 2 4 32
1t1971524557 Hwy 67, 10 miles West of
Mountain Ro , ID
WA2170023426 U — PUG!! SOUND SUPPLY C ? 5 12 9 4 1 0
Orchard Point/Little Clam Bay
Manchester, WA
1D 1890908592 USD01 - .AP iNE TIOWAL LAB 6 12 5 4 0 4
1D5890908952 unspecified
Idaho Falls, ID
wM690030931 USEPA - NCEESTERIJ.BA !ORY 3 12 7 2 0 7 2:
7411 Seach Drive East
Manchester, WA
AA4170024323 U — ADAX PQiVAL STA!ION 4 10 6 4 1 4
AA7170090099 Akak Island
A&k,AK .
WA6140106349 USD01 — SPA ROSS C(8QIZX 4 13 - 5 4 1 1 23
54UMIHwy99
Van izvsr, WA
WA2971590003 USD -DLA DU SZ FUEL SUPPO 3 10 8 4 0 2 27
• Front St & loveland Ave
Mukiltec, WA
WA4170090001 USN — NUWES INDIAN ISLAND D I ? 7 10 5 4 0 1 27
Indian Island
• Hadlock,WA
WAS214053995 USA - Y1ZD FIRING C T!R 8 10 6 0 1 2 27
142, Bldg 1140, 4 mi North of
Yak .ma, WA
-------
TABLE 2 (cost.) 12
ZPA ?ACILITt BAZJ.BDOUS SITE POINT DRINKING POINT
ID ABDP,ESS WASTE CONTAI4- WAST! U TER TOXIC WATER AIR
NO, CI WAG IT INATI DISCHARGES SUBSTANCES SUPPLY SS
OR5570O24 57 USA! - K GSLZYJUW 4 12 5 4 0 1 26
oe Wright Road, 5 iliiS of
Kianath Falls, OR
AX9570028705 USA? — SH 1Th All 3 12 2 4 1 4
Shenya Island - W of Attn Is
Sbemya, AX
Ax1572728631 USA! — CAPE LISBURNE AFS 3 10 5 4 0 1 23
PointEope, 4Oelflof
Cape Lisbnrae, AL.
A1%1570028638 USA! — CLEAR STATI 3 12 2 4 1 1 23
flvy3GN e nanaRoad
Anderson, AX
0R1570024660 USA! — MT SEBO ASS 3 10 5 4 0 1 23
0R5570090063 H y 22, 8 .iles 8 of
Rebo,OR
AX9572728633 USA? - CAP! R JZO? ASS 3 9 5 4 0 1 22
20 silas Morth of
RooperBay,AX
ORI570021264 USA? - PORTI 1C AIR MA! GUABO 3 11 5 2 0 1 22
6801NI Cornfoot Road
Portland, OR
AX7570028632 USA! — CAPE WIZNHAX ASS 4 9 2 4 0 1 20
Xuskokvia Esy
Cape Nevsnhsa, AX
WA2570024222 USA? — ) 3 ASS 3 7 6 2 1 1 20
3si leaof
Na h Bay, U
WA2 690308919 U OT- P0 AN L $ z m STA 3 7 5 0 1 20
Marine Or, Ediz So*
Port Angeles, U
WA5211020112 USA - CAl BONNEVILLE 3 7 5 2 1 1
Fourth Plain Blvd
Van uver,U
CR8680019991 SRPA - CORVALLIS LAB 3 7 5 2 0 1
200 SW 35th Street
Corvallis, OR
-------
TABLE 2 (cont )
PA FACILITY ZARDOCS SITE POINT DRINXING oi r
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONTAI4- 1 STE TER TOXIC TER AIP
NO. CITY t4ANAGE NT INATI DISCHAP GES SUBSTANCES SCPPLY SS
WA1360007271 USA) IC C — AMERICM 3 2 2 4 0 6
A exican Lake, Vetezani Dr SW
Tac a, WA
WA5971590042 US CD-DL& DPDS - FOBS LEWIS 5 2 5 4 0 0
• DLCB Idg967O
Fort Lewis, WA
WA7210020924 USAR1 — VANCOUVER BARRACKS 3 6 2 2 0 1
RQ I Corps, Bldg 638
Vancouver-, WA ..
0R5120090035 USDA RESEARCH FACILITY 5 2 5 0. 0 1
0R9120090007 3200 Jefferson Way
Corvallis, OR
WA5971520210 DSD -DLA NSC NC STER 3 2 5 2 0 0 :2
Unspecified
Manchester, WA
WA.2170090060 USN - DR1 .P.D - BRE) .RTON S 4. 2 0 4 0 0
N of Wycoff btwu X Y Streets
Breaerton, WA
WA4890031871 USDOB - FORT LEWIS PILOT PLANT 3 2 0 2 0 1
BuildingJo. 7901
North Fort Levis, WA
-------
TAELE3 14
FACILITY RATING BY STAT!
ZPA FACILITY HAZARDOUS SITE POINT DRINXING POINT
10 ADDRESS WASTE CONTAI4- 1 STEI T!R QXIC O T!P. AIR TC.TXL
MO. CITY NAGEMENT INATION DISCHARGES SU3ST 2 CZS SUPPLY SS .N :NG
AK8570028649 USA? — EI. ENflOR.? A73 10 13 8 4 2 9 46
Elnendorf ATh
Anchorage, AX
AE6210022426 USA — FORT I INWRIGHT 6 13 6 4 2 9 40
Richardson Hwy SE of
Fairbanks, AX
AK1210022157 .USA —105! RICHARDSON 7 12 5 1 2 9 39
Glenn Hwy 6 Valley Road
Anchorage, AX
AE1570028646 USA? - ZI!LSON Al’S 9 13 6 1 2 4 38
Hwy 2, 16 ai SE of
Fairbanks, At
AX3210022155 USA - FORT CREEL! 4 12 6 1 2 6 34
Richardson Hwy, 1 ai south of
Delta Junction, AX
AX4170024323 U - REAR VAL STATION 4 10 6 4 1 4 29
AX7170090099 Akak Island
Mak, AX
AK9570028705 USA? — SH ftA Al’S 3 12 2 4 1 1 26
Sheiya Island - N of Attn Is
Sbe ya,AX .
A 572728631 USA? - CAPE LISEURN!MS 3 10 5 4 0 1 23
Point Nops, IO u NE of
Cap. Lisbarns AX
A 570028638 USA? - CT & STATI 3 12 2 4 1 1 23
Hwy3$EsnanaRcad
Andsrson, At
AX9572728633 USA? — CAPE R 5!0? MS 3 9 . 5 4 0 1 22.
20 iilu North of
Hocpsr Bay, AX
AX7570028632 USA? —. CAPE REWENHAM MS 4 9 2 4 . 0 1 20
Ku kokwia Bay
Cape Newenhai, AX
-------
TABLE 3 (coot.) 15
EPA F ILITY HA2ARDC OS SIT! POINT DRINXIWG POfl T
ID ADDRLSS MAST! CON’r)J4- NASTE O T!R TOXIC TER AIR
NO. CITY NANAGZ1 JT IXATIC DISCHARG!S SUBSTANCES SUPPLY SS
IDABO
1D4890008952 USD0! IDA MAT G1N!!RNG LAB 11 13 7 4 2 8 45
Atoiic Enezgy Co Testing Res
Scoville, ID
1D3572124557 USA! — NOUN’TAIN BC4 A!! 4 13 5 4 2 4 3
1D1971524557 Evy 67, 10 i1es West of
Mountain Hone, ID
1D1890908592 USD0! — ARGONN! NATIONAL LAB 6 12 5 4 0 4 31
1D5890908952 unspecified
Idaho ?a11 , ID
OPZG
OP.6213820917 USA CI - U) TILLA DEPOT 19 14 6 4 1 4 43
1-84, Ezit 178
Bexaiston, OP.
OP .5570024757 0W — KINGSLEY VIEW 4 12 5 4 0 1 2
Joe Wright Road, 5 tiles S of
Klamatb Falls, OR
OR1570024660 USA? - ) T HEBO )JS 3 10 5 4 0 1 23
0R5570090063 Hwy 22, 8 iilu I of
Hebo,Ok
0R1570024264 USA? - PO LRND AIR EAT ABD 3 11 5 2 0 ‘1 22
6801 WE Cornfoot Road
Portland, OR
0R86800 19991 USEPI — 0RVALMS IJ 3 7 5 2 0 1 18
200 %35th 5t.t
Corval1i , OR
0R5120090035 USDA R!SW FACILITY 5 2 5 0 0 1 13
0R9120090007 3200 Jefferson Way
Comllis, OR
-------
TABLE 3 (cont,) 16
RPA fl CIL1T’t HAZARDOUS SIT! POINT DP.INXD4G POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONTAM WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR T ..L
NO. cIr }GRAGEI4ZNT INATIO DISCHARGES SUBSTANCES SU??L1 SS .AN7NG
WASHINGTON
WA7890008967 USD05 l?ORDSt? ’ .18 14 8 4 1 3 .
Hanford Site
Richland, WA
WA3570024200 USA? - MCCHORD APE 6 14 9 4 2 8 43
I—S Exit 127
WA
WA9214053465 USARKi — FORT LEWIS 10 14 8 4 . 2 4 42
I-S Exit 120.
Tort Levis, WA
WA2170023418 USE - PUGET SOUND NAVAL SEIP D 8 11 11 4 0 6
1st Street
Bremerton, WA
WA9571924647 USA? - FAIRCEILD APE 7 14. 6 4 2 7 40
Hvy2, West of
Spokane, WA
WA5170027291 USE - BANGOR STTh)0 1 8155 BASE 10 14 6 4 2 4 40
C1eer Creek Road
Bançor,WA
WA1170023419 USE - UDEZSE&WARIARL 5MG STA 9 14 8 4 1 . 4 40
308 East End
Keypcrt,WA
WA9170023361 USE - WRIDEIT ISLR AIR STA 6 14 8 4 . 0 4 36
Hwy .20 4 nlt Field Road
.OakHaxbor,WA .
WA2170023426 5M . — TUG SOUND SUPPLY C5MT 5 12 9 . 4 1 0 31
Orchard Point/Litti. Claa Bay
Manchestsr WA
WA3680030931 USRA — STUL&BA20RX 3 12 7 2 0 7 31
7411 Beach Dxiv. East
Manchester, WA . .
WA6140106349 USD0! - EPA ROSS C L5M 4 13 . 5 . 4 1 1 29
5411fl y 99:
Vancouver, WA
-------
TABLE 3 (cant.) 17
EPA FACILITY HAZAB00 0S SITE POINT ORINEI IG
I D ADDRESS NASTE CON’rAZ4— WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR
NO. CITY T4ANAGE IT INATIC4I DISCXARGZS SUBSTANCES SUPPLY (ISS
WA2971590003 USD -DLADE7 SE FUEL SUPPORT 3 10 8 4 0 2 27
Front St & I vi1knd Ave-
Bukilteo, WA
WA4170090001 USN — NUWES INDLAN ISLAND DEl 7 10 5 4 0 1 27
Indian Island
Hadlock, WA
WA8214053995 USAR) — Th WA FIRING C T!R 8 10 6 0 1 2 27
1-82, Bldg 1140, 4 ui North of
Yakima, WA
WA2570024222 USA7 — IOJ .Z A?S 3 7 6 2 1 1 20
3 ileaNWcf
Bea k Bay, WA
wA2690308919 USDOT-CG PORT ANGELES AIR STA 3 7 5 4 0 1 20
Banns D r , Ethz Rook
Port Angeles,. WA
WA5214020112 USAPI - CAN? BONNEVILLE 3 7 5 2 1 1 13
Fourth Plain Blvd
Vancouver, WA
WA1360007271 USVA ICAL CENTER — AMERICAN 3 2 2 4 0 6 17
A enican lake, Veterans Dr SW
Tac a, WA
WA5971590042 USD —DLA DPOS — FOP.! LENIS 5 2 5 4 0 0 16
OW Bldg 9670
Fort Lewis, WA
WA7210020924 USAPAU - V1JC JVU EA3RA AS 3 6 2 2 0 1 14
EQ I COrps, Bldg 638
Vancouver, WA
WA5971520270 USD -DLABSCWANCMESTU 3 2 5 2 0 0 12
Unspecified
Manchester, WA
WA2170090060 U — DR ThP.D - BR PTON S 4 2 0 4 0 0 10
B of Wycoff btwn X £ T Streets
Bre erton, WA
WA4890031871 U C — PORT TENtS PILOT ?IJdlT 3 2 0 2 0 1 8
Building No. 7901
North Fort Lewis, WA
------- |