ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ia
& OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
i
EPA-330/2-77-025a
- I
U
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Enforcement
EPA 330/2- 77-025a
EMISSION TESTS
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
Santa Fe Springs, California
(September 9-11, 1977)
December 1977
[ Revised - March 1978]
National Enforcement Investigations Center - Denver
and
Region IX - San Francisco
-------
CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION
II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
III PROCESS DESCRIPTION .
IV TEST PROCEDURES
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Particulate Sampling
Sulfur Dioxide Sampling
PROCESS MONITORING PROCEDURES
V TEST RESULTS
FIGURES
1
2
4
7
7
7
7
10
12
14
1 FCC Pollution Control Equipment
2 FCC Stack
1 Data Summary
2 FCC Unit Particulate Emissions .
3 FCC Unit Particulate Emissions . .
4 Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
5 Process Weight Summary
6 Visible Emission Observation Summary
APPENDI CES
17
18
. 19
. . 20
21
. 22
A Presurvey Inspection Report
B Stack Sampling Equipment Description
C Calibration and Data Procedures
D Analytical Procedures and Data
E Chain-of-Custody Procedures and Records
F Production Data and Process Weight Calculations
G Test Data and Emission Calculations
5
8
TABLES
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The Powerine Oil Company operates a 7,900 m 3 (50,000 bbl)/day
integrated crude oil refinery..in Santa Fe Springs, California. On
November 5, 1975, at the request of Region IX Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC)
inspected this facility to determine compliance with the regulations
*
of the Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District (LAAPCD). The sub-
sequent State Implementation Plan (SIP) inspection report recommended
that the Powerine fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit stack be source
tested to determine compliance with the applicable particulate regulations.
On February 28, 1977, the EPA Region IX requested that the NEIC
source test the Powerine FCC stack. A presurvey inspection of the
facility was performed by NEIC personnel on July 18, 1977, to evaluate
sampling locations and obtain process information [ Appendix A]. It was
determined that sampling would be feasible provided that minor modi-
fications be made to the sampling location.
From September 9 to 11 , 1977, the Powerine FCC stack emissions were
tested by NEIC to determine compliance with LAAPCD Rules 52 (concentra-
tion) and 54 (emission rate) for particulate emissions. Visible emission
observations were also made and compared to Rule 50 of the LAAPCD
regulations, which limits these emissions to less than Ringelmann
shade No. 1 (20% opacity) except for three minutes per hour.
The Agency title has since been changed to Metropolitan Zone, South
Coast Air Quality Management Districts however, not all the SIP re-
visions have been approved by EPA. The LA.4PCD regulations are con-
sidered applicable by EPA.
-------
II. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. From September 9 to 11, 1977, NEIC tested the Powerine FCC stack
emissions to determine compliartce with LAAPCD Rules 52 and 54 for
particulate emissions. Three particulate sampling runs and one
sulfur dioxide sampling run were performed according to EPA pre-
scribed methods and therequired LAAPCD procedures. In addition,
opacity readings were also made to determine compliance with LAAPCD
Rule 50 which requires that visible emissions not equal or exceed
20% opacity.
2. Test results for the FCC stack were calculated using the following
definitions of particulate matter:
LAAPCD - Inorganic particulate less the sulfate col-
lected by the filter, acetone wash, and
impingers.
Method 5 - Particulate collected at a temperature of
120°C (248°F) by the filter and acetone
wash.
Method 5 (+) - Particulate matter as defined by Method 5
plus the organic nonsulfate (as H 2 S0 4
2 H 2 0) particulate collected by impingers 1,
2 and 3).
Using the LAAPCD definition of particulate, the average FCC parti-
culate concentration was 110 mg/rn 3 (0.048 gr/scf) and the average
particulate emission was 5.3 kg (12.0 lb)/hr. These emissions are
less than that allowed by Rule 52 (128 mg/rn 3 or 0.056 gr/scf) and
Rule 54 (13.6 kg/hr or 30 lb/hr) by 14% and 61%, respectively.
-------
According to the Method 5 definition of particulate, the parti-
culate concentration and mass emission rate were 134 mg/rn 3 (0.058
gr/scf) and 6.5 kg (14.4 lb)/hr. The particulate concentration was
5% greater than the allowed 128 mg/rn 3 (0.056 gr/scf), while the
mass emission rate was 52% less than the allowed 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr.
The particulate concentration of 144 mg/rn 3 or 0.063 gr/scf deter-
mined by the Method 5(+) definition exceeded the 128 mg/rn 3 (0.056
gr/scf) limitation (Rule 52) by 12%. The average mass emission
rate (7 kg/hr or 15.4 lb/hr), however, was 49% less than the allow-
able 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr.
The results above include the contribution of broken glass in the
run no. 1 acetone wash. If the average of the particulate col-
lected in the acetone wash during runs no. 2 and no. 3 were used
instead of the run no. 1 acetone wash value, the average emission
concentrations, as calculated according to all three particulate
definitions, would be less than the allowable.
3. The single sulfur dioxide test run determined that the stack
emissions (FCC and Claus unit) had a SO 2 concentration of 1 ,020
parts per million volume (ppmv), and a SO 2 emission rate of
134 kg (295 lb)/hr.
4. Eighteen of 192 individual FCC visible emission observations
equaled or exceeded the 20% opacity limitation specified by
Rule 50. Of all the readings, 151 were 10% opacity or less.
-------
III. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Powerine Oil Company produces liquified petroleum gas (LPG),
gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, fuel oil, and asphalt at this 7,900 m 3
(50,000 λr d oil ιfineiy. Major processes include
crude desalting, atmospheric distillation, vacuum distillation, catalytic
cracking, catalytic refτrming , hydrotreating, alkylation, asphalt mahu-
facturing, and sulfur recovery.
The major particulate emissions source in the refinery is the FCC
unit [ Figure 1]. Spent catalyst in this process is continuously re-
moved from the reactor portion and introduced through piping into the
catalyst regeneration portion. Here the petroleum coe, tars, and other
residual deposits which form on the catalyst surface are burned off.
The recovered catalyst is then recycled to the reactor. Catalyst par-
ticles which, are entrained in the exhaust gases are captured by a series
of cyclone separators internal to the regenerator unit. Particles
captured by these cyclones are returned to the regenerator.
The regenerator unit exhaust gases contain considerable amounts of
carbon monoxide, particulate matter, aldehydes, sulfur oxides, ammonia,
and oxides of nitrogen. To minimize the emission of particulates and
carbon monoxide (GO) and to recover the fuel value of this material, the
regenerator exhaust gases are routed through a CO boiler for combustion,
then through an electrostatic precipitator (ESP), and into the stack.
1 State Implementation Plan Air Pollution Inspection of Powerine Oil
Company, Los Angeles County, California, EPA-NEIC, EPA 330/2-76-014,
February, 1976.
-------
Figure 1:
Powerine Oil Company. Sante Fe Sprinas. California
FCC Pollution Control equipment.
G
A
S
E
S
F.C.C.
Reactor
and
Bulkhead
lectrostatic
reci pitator
Space
-------
6
The tail gases from the sulfur recovery (Claus) unit are also combusted
in the CO boiler to convert all sulfur compounds (mostly H 2 S) to SO 2 .
The tail gases contain no particulate and thus do not contribute to the
stack particulate emissions.
-------
IV. TEST PROCEDURES
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
The FCC stack [ Figure 2] is 58 m (190 ft) high, tapering in inside
diameter incrementally from 3.6 m (12 ft) to 2.4 m (8 ft) to 1.2 m
(4 ft). Because the included angle of the tapered sections is only
15°, these sections are not considered flow disturbances. 2 The samp-
ling ports are on the south and west sides of the middle section of
the stack. This site is 20 m (65 ft), or 5.4 diameters, downstream
from the gas inlet, and 27 m (90 ft), or 11.2 diameters, upstream of
the stack exit. The sampling platform is located 1.5 m (5 ft) below
the sampling ports. Based on Method 1 criteria 3 , a total of 28 simpling
points were required. Each point was sampled for 3 minutes.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Particulate Sampling
A preliminary velocity and temperature traverse was made on the FCC
stack on September 9. A Lear-Siegler S0 2 /NOX analyzer with a 1.1 ni (3.5
ft) long, 9 cm (3.5 in) diameter probe is located 0.3 m (1 ft) upstream
of (below) the west sampling port and 5° to the right. The preliminary
velocity traverse indicated that no aberrations in measured velocities
occurred at any traverse points. It was concluded that the probe did
not cause a flow disturbance at the sampling location.
2 Guidelines for Sampling in Tapered Stacks by T. J. Logan and R. T.
Shigehara, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, October 2974.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60 Standards of Performance
for New Stationary Sources, Appendix A - Reference Methods, August 18,
1977.
-------
8
Figure 2
FCC Stack
Powerine Oil Company
Sante Fe Springs, California
1.2 m
(4)
ID
l8m (60) -
0
included / 4.6 m (15)
angle /
_____ 2Dm
(65)
4.6 m (15)
o 2 sample ports
1.5_m (5)
sample platform
2.4 m
(8)
ID 9.1 m (30)
15° .
included / I
angle / \ 4.6 m (15)
4.6 m (15)
p
gas inlet 20 m
3.6 m (65)
(12)
ID
10.7 m (35)
not to scale
-------
9
Particulate tests were conducted from September 9 to 11, 1977.
These tests were conducted in accordance with the Method 53 procedures.
The sampling train used was the Model AP 5000 manufactured by
Scientific Glass, Inc. [ Appendix B] which was configured as follows:
1. - Stainless, steel. (3l6 ) npzz le,
I . - _, ..)t
2. Glasslined probe
3. Glass fiber filter (11.4 cm diameter)
4. :-First. 1mp nger 1-:- modified Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml
distilled water
5. Second impinger - Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml distilled
water
6. Third impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith, empty
7. Fourth impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith with approx-
imately 200 g of silica gel
Moisture content of the gas stream was determined from the increase in
volume in the first three impingers and the weight gain of the silica
gel (Method 4).3
Gas samples were obtained by the grab sample technique of Method 33
Analyses were performed with Fyrite* type combustion gas analyzers.
Stack gas molecular weight was based on the average analyses of the
three gas samples collected during each run.
Three sampling runs within the isokinetic range of 90% to 110% were
performed on the FCC stack. Prior to each run, the sampling train was
leakchecked at 38 cm (15 in) Hg. At the completion of each run, a
second leak check was conducted at the highest vacuum recorded during
the run. These checks were acceptable if the leakage rate did not
exceed 0.00057 m 3 (0.02 ft 3 )/min. During each sampling run, the sampling
time was 84 minutes and the minimum gas volume collected was 849 dry
standard liters (30 dry std. ft 3 ). During the tests, probe and oven
Brand name
-------
10
temperatures were held to averages of 119°C (245°F) and 127°C (261°F),
respectively within the acceptable temperature range of 120°C (248°F)
+14°C (25°F).
The pitobe assembly (10-2) and the dry gas and orifice meters used
in this test had been calibrated prior to leaving Denver and were re-
calibrated upon return [ Appendix C]
A NEIC mobile iaboratory.,. 3ocated. at:the plan.t,.wasused for all
sampling train preparation and sample recovery. Sample recovery prd-
ceeded as follows after each test run:
1. The filter was returned to its storage container (petri
dish) and sealed with aluminum foil.
2. The nozzle, probe, cyclone, and front portion of the glass
filter holder were washed with acetone and the washings
collected in a glass jar with a Teflon*_lined cap.
3. The volume of the contents of inipingers 1, 2, and 3 was
measured as part of the moisture determination. The contents
were then rinsed with distilled water into a second glass
jar with a Teflon-lined cap.
4. Impinger 4, which contained silica gel, was weighed to
determine the moisture gain, after which the silica gel
was discarded.
All samples were returned to the NEIC laboratories for particulate
and sulfate analyses [ Appendix 0].
Chain-of-Custody procedures were followed at all times [ Appendix E].
Sulfur Dioxide Sampling
Testing for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions was conducted at the FCC
stack on September 11, 1977, in accordance with procedures in the LAAPCD
* Brand name
-------
11
Source Testing Manual, which require that all sulfate material be in-
cluded into the sample. Therefore, no isopropanol solution (for removal
of 503) or filter (for removal of particulate and acid mist) was used in
the sampling train, as required in EPA Method 6. To ensure complete
capture of all sulfur compounds, a 5% hydrogen peroxide solution was
used in the impinger train (impingers 1 and 2). The sampling train
used was the Model AP 5000 mar ufactured by Scientific Glass, Inc.
[ Appendix B] which was configured as follows:
1. Stainless steel (316) nozzle
2. Glass-lined probe
3. Glass oven bypass
4. First impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml of
5% hydrogen peroxide solution
5. Second impinger -- Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml of 5%
hydrogen peroxide solution
6. Third impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith, empty
7. Fourth impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith with approx-
imately 200 g of silica gel
The moisture content was determined as previously described for the
particulate tests.
One sampling run was performed at a constant sampling rate on the
FCC stack. The stack center point was sampled for 60 minutes. Leak
checks, oven and probe temperatures, and equipment calibrations were
as those described above in Particulate Sampling.
The mobile laboratory was used for all sampling train preparation
and sample recovery. Sample recovery proceeded as follows:
1. The nozzle, probe, and oven bypass were washed with acetone,
and the washings were collected in a glass jar with a Teflon-
lined cap.
2. The volume of the contents of impingers 1, 2 and 3 was measured
as part of the moisture determination. The contents were then
rinsed with distilled, deionized water into a second glass jar
with a Teflon-lined cap.
Air Poll.ution Source Testing Manual, 1972 LAAFCD , Rev. Ed., Chapter 4.
-------
12
3. Impinger 4, which contained silica gel , was weighed to deter-
mine the moisture gain, after which the silica gel was discarded.
Samples were retained for sulfate analysis.
PROCESS MONITORING PROCEDURES
To ensure normal operating conditions and to determine the process
weight rate, the FCC unit was monitored during source testing [ Appendix F].
The three most important process parameters observed and recorded
were:
1. The oil feed rate to the F CC reactor
2. The catalyst circulaticri rate to the FCC reactor
3. The air feed to the FCC regenerator
The first two parameters were added together to determine the FCC
process weight. However, only the first and third process parameters
were read in the FCC control room. The second parameter, catalyst
circulation rate, was calculated by the Company and provided to the
process observer.
The FCC pollution control equipment instrumentation was also
monitored primarily to determine whether the equipment was operated
steady-state during the sampling periods. The process observer re-
corded the ESP primary and secondary current, primary voltage, spark
rate, CO boiler flue gas BTU value, and air feed rate at periodic
intervals [ Appendix F]. Any changes observed in the instrument values
were considered possible process upsets; the unit operators were asked
to explain and/or to correct the upset.
-------
13
The sulfur recover (Claus) unit operations were not monitored because
it is not a particulate emission source.
-------
V. TEST RESULTS
The Powerine FCC stack was sampled four times--three particulate
runs and one sulfur dioxide run. Isokinetic sampling rates for the
three particulate runs ranged from 100.4% to 103%, which is within the
specified range of 90% to 110%. Sulfur dioxide testing was performed at
a constant sampling rate at the stack center point. Test data [ Appendix
G] are summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.
During testing, the FCC unit was operating at a rate of about
1,800 m 3 (11,300 bbl)/day of oil [ Table 5]. The catalyst circulation
rate and air feed rate did not vary [ Appendix F] and Company personnel
stated that the FCC was operating at a normal feed rate. These feed
rates were the same as those observed during the presurvey inspection
and, therefore, it was concluded that the FCC unit was operating at a
normal rate.
The FCC process weight averaged 0.80 (1.74) million kg(lb)/hr
which, based on LAAPCD Rule 54, allows 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr of particulate
to be emitted. A particulate concentration of 128 mg/m 3 (0.056 gr/std.
ft 3 ) is allowed by Rule 52 when the average volumetric flow rate is 808
m 3 (28,600 std. ft 3 )/min [ Table 1].
The test results presented in Tables 2 and 3 have been interpreted
using the following definitions of particulate:
1. LAAPCD - Inorganic particulate less the sulfate collected
by the filter, acetone wash, and impingers.
2. Method 5 - Particulate collected at a temperature of 120°C
(248°F) by the filter and acetone wash, i.e., the
front half.
3. Method 5 (+) - Particulate matter as defined by Method 5 plus
the organic nonsulfate (as H 2 S0 4 2 H 2 0)
particulate collected by impingers 1, 2 and 3.
-------
Broken glass was found in the run no. 1 acetone wash. To the
extent possible, the glass was removed, taking care no sample was lost
with the glass. Based on the fact that the particulate value for the
run no. 1 acetone wash was twice as high as those for the other two runs
(Table 1], the broken glass probably biased the run no. 1 results high.
The test results are presented as computed using the biased value.
Based on the LAAPCD definition of particulate, the average FCC
particulate concentration was 110 mg/rn 3 (0.048 gr/std. ft 3 ) and the
average particulate emission rate was 5.3 kg (11.7 lb)/hr [ Table 2].
According to Rule 52, the allowed concentration is 128 mg/rn 3 (0.056
gr/std. ft 3 ). The average particulate emission rate is 5.3 kg (11.7
lb)/hr, or 39% of the allowed 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr.
Method 5 results were 134 mg/rn 3 (0.058 gr/std. ft 3 ) and 6.5 kg
(14.4 lb)/hr [ Table 2]. This particulate concentration (134 mg/rn 3 ) is
about 5% higher than the allowable concentration. The average parti-
culate emission rate was only 48% of the allowed 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr.
The Method 5 (+) calculations resulted in an average emission
concentration of 144 mg/rn 3 (0.063 gr/std. ft 3 ) and particulate emissions
of 7.0 kg (15.4 lb)/hr [ Table 3]. The emission concentration (144
mg/rn 3 ) exceeded the Rule 52 limitation of 128 mg/rn 3 by 12%. However,
the average mass emission rate was only 51% of the allowed 13.6 kg (30
lb)/hr.
Replacing the run no. 1 acetone wash particulate catch with the
average of the acetone catches for runs no. 2 and 3, then the concen-
tration calculated according to all three particulate definitions would
be less.
The single sulfur dioxide test run determined that the stack emis-
sions (FCC and Claus unit) had a SO 2 concentration of 1,020 ppmv and SO 2
emission rate of 134 kg (295 lb)/hr [ Table 4].
-------
16
According to Rule 50, the FCC visible emissions are limited to less
than 20%. The highest individual opacity during the source testing was
35% [ Table 5], but only 18 of 192 individual opacity readings equaled
or exceeded 20% opacity. Of all the visible emission observations, 151
were 10% opacity or less.
-------
17
Table 1
DATA SUMMARY
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
1
Parameter 9/9-10
2
3
4 t
9/10
9/11
9/11
Volume Sampled (STP)tt
1i ers 1032 1095 956 662
ft 36.44 38.66 33.76 23.39
Moisture % 12.0 12.0 12.0 13.1
Barometric Pressure
cm Hg 77.2 77.2 76.1 76.1
in Hg 30.40 30.40 29.95 29.95
Stack Gas Temperature
253 248 251 252
°F 488 478 483 495
Molecular Weight (dry) 30.53 30.31 30.54 30.54
% Isokinetic 103.0 100.4 101.3
stack Gas Velocity
m/sec 5.7 6.2 5.5
ft/sec 18.8 20.2 17.9
Vo1ume ric Flow Rate (STP)tt
m min 800 871 753
ft 1mm 28,330 30,830 26,670
Particulate Collected (mg)
filter 45 58 40
acetone wash 138 66 67
impinger catch (inorganic) 31 41 151
impinger catch (organic) 4 2 2
Sulfate Collected as H 2 S0 4 2 H 2 0
filter 17 20 11
acetone wash 20 10 20
impinger catch (inorganic) 31* 41* 130
t Run #4 was for SO 2 ; Runs 1-3 were for particulate.
tt STP-Standard Temperature (68°F) and Pressure (29.92 in. Hg) - dry.
* Actual value was greater than particulate catch, therefore, the value
of the particulate catch was substituted.
-------
18
Table 2
FCC UNIT PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Parameter
Run Number
1
2
3
Avg.
LAAPCD Procedure Particulate Results
Particulate catch (mg)
146
94
97
Concentrati o
gr/s d. ft
mg/rn
0.061
141
0.037
86
0.045
103
0.048
110
Emission Rate
lb/hr
15
9.9
10.2
11.7
kg/hr
6.8
4.5
4.6
5.3
Method 5 Procedure Particulate Results
Particulate catch (mg)
183
124
107
Concentrat ioq
gr/s d, ft
mg/rn
0.077
177
0.049
113
0.049
112
0.058
134
Emission Rate
lb/hr
18.8
13.1
11.2
14.4
kg/hr
8.5
5.9
5.1
6.5
Emission Limitations
Concentration
gr/s f
mg/rn
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.056
128
Emission Rate
lb/hr
-
-
-
30.0
kg/hr
-
-
13.6
-------
19
Table 3
FCC UNIT PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Parameter
Run Number
.
1
2
3
Avg.
Method 5 (+) Procedure
Particulate
Results
Particulate catch
(mg)
187
126
130
Concentrati or
gr/s d. ft
mg/rn
0.079
181
0.050
115
0.059
136
0.063
144
Emission Rate
lb/hr
19.2
13.3
13.6
15.4
kg/hr
8.7
6.0
6.2
7.0
Emission Limitations
Concentration
gr/s f
mg/rn
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.056
128
Emission Rate
lb/hr
-
-
-
30.0
kg/hr
-
-
-
13.6
-------
20
Table 4
SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
POWERtNE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Run No.
Parameter 4
Sulfate collected (mg)
Acetone wash 9.5
Impingers 2740
Total 2749.5
Volume sampled (STP)t
liters 662
Sulfur dioxide concentration
ppmv 1020
Volume ric ow rate (STP)*
m 1mm 808
Sulfur dioxide emissions
lb/hr 295
kg/hr 134
t STP-Standard Temperature (68°F) and Pressure (29.92 in. Hg)
- dry.
tt Average of Runs 1, 2, and 3.
-------
Table 5
PROCESS WEIGHT SUMMARY
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Catalyst*
Date
(September)
Circulation
Rate
m. tons/hr
(tons/hr)
Oil Feed
Rate
.
Total Process
Weight Rate
Allowable
Emissions
kg/hr
(lb/hr)
m. tons/hr
(tons/hr)
kg/hr
(lb/hr)
3
m /day
(bbl/day)
m. tons/hr
(tons/hi-)
9
760
(840)
1,800
(11,300)
27
(30)
797
(870)
797,OOO
(1,740,000)
13.6
(30)
10
11
760
(840)
760
(840)
1,810
(11,400)
1,840
(11,550)
27
(30)
27
(30)
797
(870)
797
(870)
797,000
(1,740,000)
797,000
(1,740,000)
13.6
(30)
13.6
(30)
Calculated by Company IAppendix F].
N)
-I
-------
Table 6
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION SUMMARY
POWERINE OIL COMPANY
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Date
(September)
.
Run
No.
, Range of
Emission Opacitv (%)
9
1
1
5-20
5-15
10
1
2
520
1035
11
3
3
4
4
0-15
0-10
5-10
10-25
22
-------
APPENDIX A
PRESURVEY INSPECTION REPORT
-------
APPENDIX A
Chief, Field Operations Branch August 10, 1977
Paul R. dePercin
Presurvey Inspection of the Powerine Oil Conpany, Sante Fe Springs,
Cal iforni a
On July 18, 1977, Art Powell, Los .Angeles Air Pollution Control
iiistrict (L.A APCD) and the vriter inspected the Powerine Oil Company,
Sante Fe Springs, California, to ottain info ation necessary to conduct
a source test of the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit stack. This
information includad the FCC and sulfur recovery process description,
air pollution control equipment configuration, source test feasibility,
and process and control equipment operating data availability. Of
particular interest were the available sai pling locations and whather
modifications to such locations were necessary in order to conduct the
source test safely and acquire representative data.
The plant representatives contacted here essrs. tlalter Ziemba,
Environniantal Affairs Coordinatcr, and tja,id Jrayt, Operations flanager.
EPA, Region IX, requested dEIC to source test the FCC stack for
particulates a: d sulfur dioxide (so 2 ), the FCC unit and tue sulfur
recovery unit emissions are emitted frcn the sar e stack. The results of
a June 5, 1969, source test by the LA APCD were 15.8 kg (3 .9 lb)/hr of
particulate, mich exceeded the allowable rate (LM APCD, Rule 54) of
13.6 kg (30 lb)/nr. A source test conGucted January 7, 1976, by KV
Engineering aeternineci that the sulfur cioxide concentration as b7Y
ppiiv (wet) and the mass emission rate was 243 kg ( 3G lb)/hr. The FCC
unit SO 7 emissions are limited to 2,600 ppmv (dry) (LA ? 1 PCC, Rule 53.1)
while the sulfur reccvcry unit SO, er issions are limited to O0 pprnv
(dry) and 91 kg (200 hi)/hr (LA jPC ), Rule 53.2). Since the two units
emit throuqh the sa e stack, compliance of the stack emissions depends
on the applicable 502 regulation.
PROCESS DESCUPTIC
Powurine Oil Company operates a petroleum refinery at Sante F
Springs with a rated capacity of bU,J.)3 D51/Cay of crude oil. Major
processes at this refinery include cruJe desalting, atmospheric dis-
tillation, vacuum aistillation, catalytic cracking, catalytic reforming,
-------
A-2
hydrotreatirig, alkylation, asphalt r 1 lanufdcturing anti sulfur recovery.
Of these processes, two-catalytic cracking and sulfur recovery--are
more fully described below.
Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit
- Spent catalyst from the FCC unit is continuously removed from the
reactor portion and introduced through piping into the catalyst regen-
eration portion. Here the petroleum coke, tars, and other residual
deposits whicn form on the catalyst surface are burned off the catalyst
fines. The recovered catalyst is then recycled to the reactor. Catalyst
particles which are entrained in the exhaust gases are. partially captured
by a series of cyclone separators internal to the regenerator unit.
Particles captured by these cyclones are returnee to the regenerator.
Sulfur Recovery Unit 2
The tiydrogen sulfide H 2 S ricn offgases from the amine stripping
plant are processed in a 24 m. tons (24 long tons)/day Claus unit to
convert the H,S to elemental sulfur. The Claus plant is a two-stage
unit and is currently producing between 10 and 14 m. tons (10 and 14 long
tons)/day of sulfur. In the Claus process, H 2 S is burned to form sulfur
dioxide (SO 2 ). The SO 2 and H.,S react in the presence of a bauxite
catalyst to form elemental suIfur and water vapor. Typical sulfur
recovery efficiencies for Claus plants are 85 for one catalytic stage
and 95 for tw stages.
AIR PGLLUTIO 4 CO ITROL EQUIP iE?iT
The regenerator portion of the FCC unit exhaust gases contain
carbon monoxide, particulate matter, aldehydes, sulfur oxides, arr m.onia,
and oxides of nitrogen. To minimize the particulates and carbon monoxic e
(CU) emissions anti recover the fuel value of this material, the r gen
erator exhaust gases are combusted in a CO boiler IFigure 1]. The tail
gases from the sulfur recovery unit are incinerated in the same CO
boiler to convert all sulfur compounds to SO?. Hot gases from the CO
boiler pass through an economizer and a Reseγrch-Cottrcll electrostatic
precipitator (ESP) before exiting out the stack.
SOURCE SPJiPLI G FEASIBILITY
State Implementation Plan Air Pollution Insp2ction of Powerine Oil
Company, Los Angeles, California, by dEIC, EPA 330/2-76014, February
1975, page 9.
2 Ibid. pages 11 and 12.
-------
A- 3
Sampling Location
The FCC and sulfur recovery unit ei issionS art exhausted from a
tapered 55 rn (130 ft) stack [ Figure 2]. Sampling ports are situated
I .3 ni (33 ft) downstream of the gas inlet and 27.4 m (93 ft) upstream
of the stack exit where the stack diameter Is 2.4 in (8 ft). The two
tapered sectiofls of stack are not considered f1a i disturbances because
the included angle is 150.* The ports are 5.6 and 11.3 diameters
iownstream and tipstream of a flow disturbance, respectively.
A sani 1ihg platfon i a1low access to one fourth of the stack
circumference, wiiere the two sampling ports (south and west) are 1ocated
The 10 cm (4 in) ports are 1.5 m (5ft) above the sample platform, which
has a railing 1.1 m (3.5 ft) high. In front of the south and west
ports, the platform is 0.9 in (3 It) and 1.3 m (6 ft) ,ida, respectively.
A LearSiegler SO 2 / Ox monitor, protected ,ith a 0.8 in (2.7 ft) by
0.5 in (1.5 ft) cover, is usually housed only 0.3 C l (1 ft) be1ot the west
port. This monitor has a probe 9 cn (3.5 in) in diameter and 1.1 m (3.5
ft) long. Prior to the presurvey inspection, the monitor had been
removed and returned to L ar-Siegler for repair.
tiodi Ii Cdti O t iS
iO major modificatio 1 is to the saripling facilities are needed. The
Company should be required to perform the minor modifications listed
below:
-a. Install a padeye 1.3 m (6 ft) above each port (south and west)
o support a monorail.
b. Remove The temporary gas sample probe in the south port.
c. Do not installthe Lear-Siegler SO 2 / 0x monitor and cover
until the source test is coii2lete.
Miscellaneous
The EIC air sampling van can be parked near the base of the FCC
stack where electrical power is avai1a ie. Adequate electric power
(llUv20 amp) is also available at thd test platform. The ladders to
the platform are cayed and have rest st s every 7.6 n (25 It). Eq
Equipment can be i au1ed to the test p1 tform by an existing pulley
system.
* Guidelines for Sanpling in Tapered Stacks by T. J. Logan an R. 1.
Shigehara, EPA, TP, LC., October l 74.
-------
A-4
PROCESS Aik) CONTROL EQUIPME 1T OBSEkVMTIOiiS
Instruments in the FCC unit control room monitor operating conditions
of the FCC unit, the sulfur recovery unit, and the CO boiler. Instru:.iei ts
at a ground-l2vel panel monitor operating conditions of the LSPs. All
instruments will be oDserved during each source test run to determine
whether steadystate operations existed.
The FCC unit process weight is defined as the sum of the oil feed
rate and the catalyst circulation rate to the reactor portion of the FCC
unit.* The oil feed rate has a direct instrur ent readout in the FCC
control room, but the catalyst circulation rate must be calculated. The
Company should be requested to supply the oil feed rate and catalyst
circulation rate for each source test run. This will insure agr e nent
betaeen EPA and the Company on the applicable process weight for each
run.
SU;1;IARY A; D CO CLUSIO S
The Powerine Oil FCC stack emissions car, be source tested for
particulatc and sulfur dioxide. A good sampling location is available
whicn with minimal riiodifications will allow EPA ethod 5 and 6 sampliny.
Tnese modifications, itonized Delow, are required:
a. Install pad yes 1.8 m (6 ft) above the FCC stack south and
west ports, i.e., the two ports 900 apart.
b. Remove the temporary gas saiuple pro ie from the south port.
c. Remove the LearSie 1er SO 2 /i Cx monitor weather cover and do
- not install the monitor until tie sampling is complete.
In addition, to perform source testing, the following must be
provided by the Company:
a. A parking spot for the EIC air sampling van (8 ft x 40 ft)
near the base of the FCC stack.
b. Electric po ;er to the van. Either a standard range plug or
thoilO volt, 20 a p lines will be satisfactory.
Process operations will be monitored in the FCC unit co;itrol roo,
to deten ine whether nor 1 nal operations exist. Therefore, access to
* Telephone conversation with Jame s iance, LA APC , on July 1 , 1977.
-------
H-.)
this roo n will be required by the process observer. To determinc the
FCC unit process waight, after each sampling r n the Co 1 pany should
supply the following process data for the sampling period:
a. Oil feed rate to the FCC unit (bbls/day).
b. Catalyst circulation rate (tons/nm).
A determination of the applicable sulfur dioxide regulation is
needed. The SO 2 emissions r ust meet either the sulfur plant or the
general process SO 2 regulations.
-------
APPENDIX B
STACK SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
-------
APPENDIX B
STACK SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
The Scientific Glass Ilodel AP-5000 modular STAC-O-LATUR sampling
train consists of a control unit, a sampling unit and a vacuum unit. The
units are connected together with quick disconnect electrical and air
lines and umbilical cords.
The AP5000 control unit contains the following:
1. Dual-inclined manometer (range 0-5 H ,0) for indicating the
pitot tube velocity pressure and the orifice pressure drop.
2. Temperature control for the oven and probe.
3. A flow valve and a bypass valve for adjusting sampling rates.
4. Digital Temperature Indicator (DII) which gives an instant
readout from six (6) points; stack, probe, oven, impinger
outlet, meter inlet, meter outlet by the use of a selector
switch.
5. Umbilical cords of (50 and 100 ft lengths) which interconnect
the control and sampling units.
6. Communications sets are wired through control unit, umbilical
cord to the sampling unit.*
The sampling unit is made up of three distinct sections: impinger
case, oven, and probe. All three sections can be converted to form one
sampling unit or can be separated for unusual sampling conditions.
Below are the individual component descriptions.
1. Probe Sheath - Made of 316 stainless steel. The nozzle end
is packed with asbestos string. The ball joint (sampling
unit) end has a woven teflon 0 Ring as packing material.
2. Probe liner 5/8 0.0. medium wall glass (pyrex) or stainless
steel (316) tubing logarithmically wrapped with nicrome heating
element, having a resistance of 2 ohms/ft. The liner is
insulated with fiberglass and asbestos with a type K thermocouple
inibedded for sensing the probe temperature.
3. Filter Frit - Porous glass frit (coarse) banded to silicone
rubber.
* Separate corrununication system used during this test program.
-------
B-2
4. Oven - Fiberglass insulated capable of maintaining 120°C
(248°F) in cold weather (0°c).
The vacuum unit (pump) is capable of drawing a high vacuum (50 cm
Hg) and a moderate volume (14 1pm) of air. The pump is rotary fiber
vane type which does not require lubrication, but oil bath filters are
used for pump protection.
-------
APPENDIX C
CALIBRATION AND DATA PROCEDURES
-------
APPENDIC C
Discussion of Calibration
As discussed in the text, the pitobe assembly and the dry gas meter
were calibrated before and after the source test survey. Each piece of
equipment met the accuracy criteria contained in the procedures in this
Appendix prior to the source test survey. Post-survey calibrations are
conducted and compared with pre-survey calibrations.
The dry gas meter accuracy coefficient changed from 0.98 to 0.96.
However, the coefficient did not change by more than 5% as allowed in
Section 5.3 of Method 5 (40 CFR Part 60. Appendix A).
The calibration coefficient of pitobe 10-2 changed from 0.76 to 0.80
(+5.3%). However, Method 2 (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A) makes no mention
of using the post-survey pitobe calibration coefficients, inferring initial
coefficients should be used in all calculations, i.e., for isokinetic and
emission rate determinations.
Using the pre-survey pitobe coefficients the isokinetic rates ranged
from 100.4% to 103.0%. With the post-survey pitobe coefficients, the
isokinetic rates would range from 95.3% to 97.8%.
If the post-survey coefficients for the dry gas meter and pitobe
assembly were used to recalculate the mass emission rate, the effect
would be to reduce the report results (12 lb/hr) by 3%.
-------
c-i
NEIC PROCEDURE FOR
CALIBRATION OF DRY GAS METER
AND ORFICE METER
Dry gas meters are used in source testing units to accurately
measure sample volumes drawn during testing. A critical orfice is
also installed to provide a known sampling rate so that isokinetic
sampling can be maintained. These units will be calibrated before
and after each sampling trip.
Calibration is accomplished by making simultaneous total volume
measurements with a calibrated wet test meter and the dry gas meter.
The wet test meter must be previously calibrated from a primary standard.
Calibration is performed follows:
1. Level wet test meter and adjust the water level to the
proper point.
2. Level and zero the manometer on sampling control unit.
3. Leak check unit and air hoses at 15 inch Hg (leakage rate must
be zero). Assemble vacuum line to the wet test meter.
(Caution: NO NOT Leak Check System by Plugging the Inlet to
the Wet Test Meter, this will cause internal damage to the
meter.)
4. Warm up control unit by operating vacuum pump for 30 minutes
with wet test meter connected in series.
5. Close the course valve and open the fine adjust (bypass) valve.
6. Turn or vacuum pump, open course adjust valve and turn the fine
adjust valve until manometer reads 0.5 H 2 0 ( H).
-------
C-2
7. Simultaneously record the dry gas meter reading, wet test
meter reading and time. Record temperature of wet test
meter, inlet and outlet temperature of dry gas meter and
atmospheric pressure during the test run.
8. Allow pump to run until the wet test meter indicates
exactly 5 cubic feet of air have passed through the system
(10 cubic feet when a AH of 2, 3 and 4 inches H 2 0 are used)
and record time.
9. Repeat steps 59 for t H of 1, 2 3 and 4 1120.
10. Calibration record will be kept in a permanent file at NEIC.
Copies will be made for field use.
Calculations
Calculate the accuracy of the dry gas meter (y) as follows:
Vw Pb (t1 + 460 )
I = Vd (Pb + AH (tw + 460)
13.6)
Where: 3
V = Volume of gas metered, wet test meter, ft.
Vd = Volume of gas metered, dry gas meter, ft. 3
Atmospheric pressure, inches Hg
td = Dry gas meter temperature, °F ( td in td out )
2
= Wet test meter temperature, 0 F
If y 1.00 (4 0.02) then gas meter will be taken to Public Service
Company of Colorado gas meter shop for adjustment and/or repair.
Orf ice meter coefficient (ttH@ = 0.317 1 H [ Rtw+460) 1
Pb(td+ 4 &O) L v J
-------
3
Where:
= Volume of gas metered, wet test meter, ft
Atmospheric pressure
Dry gas meter temperature,
= Wet test meter temperature, °F
9 = Time elapsed, minutes
C- 3
-------
C-4
NEIC Procedure for Pitot Tube Calibration
Introduction
The Type-S pitot tube is used by NEIC to measure stack gas
velocity during source sampling. The pitot tube coefficient (Cp)
of this instrument is determined by calibration against a trace-
able National Bureau of Standards (NBS) standard pitot tube. The
Type-S pitot tube is calibrated on a probe sheath with a ½ inch dia
nozzle attached. All pitot tubes are calibrated from 305 rn/mm
(1000 It/mm) to 1524 rn/mm (5000 ft/mm). Pitot tubes used during
tests wifi subsequently be recalibrated at a minimum of 3 points
within the velocity range observed during testing. Tubes which have
been damaged or suspected of being damaged during field use will be
recalibrated over the entire range (i.e. 305 to 1524 in/mm).
I. Equipment Required
A. Flow
meeti
(1)
System Calibration is performed in a flow system
ng the following minimum requirements:
The air stream is confined in a well-defined cross
sectional area, either circular or rectangular.
The minimum size is 30.5 cm (12 inches) diameter
for circular ducts and at least 25 cm (10 inches),
as the shortest dimension for rectangular ducts.
(2) Entry ports provided in the test section, shall be a
minimum of 8 duct diameters downstream and 2 diameters
upstream of any flow disturbance, e.g. bend, expansion,
contraction, opening, etc.
-------
-2-
C-5
(3) The flow system must have the capacity to generate over
the range of 305 rn to 1524 m (1000 ft. - 5000 ft.)/min.
Velocities in this range must be constant with time to
guarantee steady flow during calibration.
B. Calibration Standard
A standard type pitot tube either calibrated directly
by 1.B.S. or traceableto an T1.B.S. standard shall be
the calibration standard.
C. Differential Pressure Gauge
An inclined or expanded scale manometer shall be
used to measure velocity head (i P). Such gauges thall be
capable of measuring P to within ± 0.13 mm (0.005 inches)
1120. A micro-manometer capable of measuring with 0.013 mm
(0.0005 in) 1120 will be used to measure P of less than
13 (0.5) 1120.
D. Pitot Tube Lines
Flexible lines made of ty on or similar tubing shall
be used.
E. Thermometer
A merc .zry in glass or other type thermometer checked
agains a mercury in glass thermometer is considered suitable.
F. Barometer
A mercury column barometer shall be available to determine
atmospheric pressure.
II. Physical Check
1. The openings are sharp and do not have a rolled edge.
2. The impact planes of sides A & B are perpendicular to
the Traverse Tube axis (Figure 2].
-------
III. Cal
C-6
3. The impact planes are parallel to the longitudinal tube axis
[ Figure 3].
ibration Procedure
The Type-S pitot tube shall be assigned an identification
number. The first digit of the number is the effective length of
the tube, followed by a dash and consecutive numbers for the number
of tubes ol the same effective length. i.e. 5-1 signifies a five
foot pitot;tube and is the numb er one tube. Calibration proceeds
as follows.
A.
Fill manometer with clean oil of the proper specific gravity.
Attach and leak check all pitot tube lines.
B. Level and zero manometer.
C. Position the standard pitot tube in the test section at
the calibration point. If the flo , system is large enough
and does no interfere with the TypeS tube the standard
tube may be left in the system.
D. Insert the Type-S tube into the flow system.
E. Checks for the effect of turbulance are made as follows:
1. Read P on both Type-S and standard pitot tubes with
the standard pitot tube in place and compare with read-
ings when the standard tube is withdrawn from system.
2. Read P on the Type-S tube at centerline of flow system,
then take readings while moving the tube to the side
of the system. This will define the boundary turbularice
layer.
3. Position the Type-S tube so that there impact openings
are perpendicular to the duct cross sectional area and
-------
-4- C-7
check for null (zero) reading. Absence of a null reading at
this position indicates non-laminar flow conditions.
F. Read td and record on data table.
G. With the Type-S A leg orientated into the flo,, read P 5
and record on data table.
H. Repeat steps F and S until three sets of velocity data
have t ieen obtained.
I. Remove Type-S pitot tube and rotate probe nozzle until it
aligns with side B impact openings.
J. Insert the Type-S pitot tu 6 e and proceed as in steps F through
H.
K. Adjust flow system to new volocity and repeat FJ.
1. Record air ternp rature in the test system and barometric
pressure during testing.
IV. Calculations
1. At each Aside and Bside velocity setting, calculate
the three valves of Cp (s) as follows:
Cps = Cp std std
V t Ps
Where:
Cp Type-S pitot tube coefficient
Cp std Standard pitot tube coefficient MBS)
std Velocity head, measured by Standard
pitot tubing inches 1120
Velocity head, measured by the TypeS
pitot tube, inches 1120
2. Calculate tp, the average (mean of the three Cp(s)
valves.
-------
C-8
3. For each P calculated in step 2, calculate a, the average
deviation from the mean as follo is:
1
o(Side A or B) = ]Cp Cs) p (A or B)
3 _______________________
3
4. The pitot is acceptable if:
(a) The A and B side average deviations calculated by
equation 2 are < 0.01.
(b) The difference of the Aand B sides p calculated
by equation 1 is < 0.01 for each individual velocity.
5. Calculate the test section velocity as follows:
V = KCp IT std
Where:
V= Average test-section velocity, ft/mm
K = 5130 (constant)
Cp = Coefficient of standard pitot tube
I = Temperature of gas stream
P = Barometric pressure, inches Fig
M = Molecular weight of air = 29.0
std = Average of the three standard pitot
tube readings, inches H 2 0
V. Record Keeping
Flow system data and information on each pitot tube shall
be recorded in a bound book.
The flow system data shall include:
1. The tunnel crosssectional area and length
upstream and down-stream of the test site )ft.)
from disturbances.
-------
-6- c-
2. Time tunnel used (hrs)
3. Mr temperature (°F) in flow system and barometric
pressure (inches Hg).
4. AU checks for turbulance and flow distribution.
5. Velocity range (ft/mm).
The pitot tube information shall include:
1. I:D. number
2. Checks for physical d wages, errors noted and
modifications.
3. Dates and surveys pitot tubes were used.
4. Date of calibrations, coefficient and dates of
re-calibration..
The calibration records will be kept on file at NEIC. Copies rf
the appropMate calibration dates will be furnished for each source
test project.
-------
c-b
.,
Figure 1. Measureme t of Type-S pizot zubo Ien th (dimons on a. nd impac:-p r e
Iu
separation di tanco (dimer sio b
1RANSIERSE I
TUBE AXIS
I.4___. IMPACT.*t
PLANES
:F ure 2. Type-S pitotitube. end 1
VI W; impact- opening p!anes per-
peno cuIar to transverse tube axis.,
;A SID E PLAr E
WBEAYI IS B
L 1 It7.PI AII A
BSIDE PLAUE.
Figure 3. Type-s tube, top View: impect-open.
Jng planes parallel to long zudinai tube axis.
From A TYPE-S PIlOT TUBE CALIBRATION STUDY by
L
Robert F. Vollaro, October 15, 1975
-------
C-il
Orifice Meter Calibration
Date tj?/77
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
At tJ
Box lb. 2 -
Dry gas meter flo .
c 0 C;
Orifice
Manometer
setting,
Gas volume
wet test
meter
V ,,
Gas volume
dry gas
meter
V ,
Teinoerature
Time
0,
Wet Test
Dry qas_meter
Meter
Inlet
Outlet
Average
t
t j
t J 0
t j
in. F1 2 0
ft
ft
°F
°F
°F
°F
mm
y
E H@
0.5
5
1.0
5
7 L
7L/
7\ 3
I 7 3
2.0
10
fCj ?
73
7 ?
7L 1
7L f/ ,f
i7 ,
3.0
10
ic.
7 .
q
(
q 3
.?
/. )
4.0 10 1V 1 19
Calculations
S
yeL ci
8, cL
..jYI_J 73 r
AH@
l 6
P (t + 460)
Vrl t AH (t 1 ,, + 460)
:
O.031ThH + 460)o
1 h (td+ 460) U vs., -
0.5
0.0368
136
3( 7 . -t-LILC -
1 o )( 9 9( .L)
-a-
0 o i ?-o
i 3(- 3 c-q&
1.0
0.0737
5- L. 5(7q. r9Lc))
oOg,-7, /.O r(, *L,Lc 7
. .i / 3(p,1. c . 4& )L J
5e5 (9/ -r- V7273-it/&c)
2.0
0.147 /0 ,η i. . (7, - d o
/&r? ta-, t-
p_ci __ 2 o r (,- - . &k.c // %7
/0 J
3.0
0.219 J /L C J( .3( ?/4-&ILC )
/C
OC 7 ..jO r( )5 ,37
/0 1
4.0
0.294 / u(,3( ir/ ;o)
1 1ηi c)
OL& 4.
3 -
Where: V
Td
0
Remarks:
1.
= Volume, wet test meter Calibration by: \ . h
= Volume Dry gas meter
= Temperature, Wet Test Meter Checked by:_
= Temperature, Dry Gas Meter
= Atmospheric Pressure, Inches Hg
= Time, minutes
--I J
4/2V77
-------
C- 12
Orifice Meter Calibration
Date Y/1 7
Box flo.
La. q 3
Barometric pressure,ib= in. Hg ____ .Z.
____
Lr\ 2 . 7 z () 1 r/J .
Dry gas meter Uo .
Calibratthn by
V = Volume, wet test meter
vJ Volume Dry gas meter
Tb., Temperature, tIet Test Meter Checked by:
= Temperature, Dry Gas Meter
= Atmospheric Pressure, Inches Hg
0 = Time, minutes
Remarks:
4/24/77
-------
L nv I suii ! ;i Cc i roCcc Li On cjenc.y
flational En 1o cc;nent Invcsticj L o;i Ceri1crL icr C13
C i1jbra jon Pit.oL Tub3:ID Numb2r Vi / Cp _______________
Type-S Pitot Tube ID Number: , -_______________
P SType Pitot ________________
Standard
Pitot A leci B leci A B Cornrnents0U
12(2 . .o
,./g- s__
;73
I )η7
rjg ;q )
/ )C
70 ,
7L 7 ,
,ig
.190
th
.
. 2Th
- - 7q 7
1gb -
, 7.5 . 7 7
7
i.5 2 I 7c2-
/j 3 I
V
-
t.COL η
J____________________
3
35V
. 36S
3cc
7 I 7.52 F
I £ I
,
7S2 I
2 . 7c ,
. 3C0
,
7c-7
.
. s o
,
7 . I I
j7( O ,j53
S o
,7 .
7S
j\,c-
2.? p ,
. if
7 .S S I 7S
-
.
I
. 7 ,3 I ,7 S / Leg Average Cp
During Pitot Calibration:
probe sheath attached f s
nozzle attached η
samplingisojcinetically._______
Performed By:_________________ Caiib tion Date:_
_____ / / .
-------
c-i 4
It.,
( 7 lL4 .-
(c73 C/J
2 q
Comments
During Pitot Calibration:
probe sheath attached Y T
nozzle attached________________
samp lingisokineticaily________
)
Performed By: \
U$ L nv I ronm ri al Protec. Lion Agency
r:ati onal [ n Ioccc::: ii Invc Li cjaL i oris Center- Dcnv r
ν t- _1 I
Calibration PiLot Tube:ID I umber
Type-S Pitot Tube ID Nunber:_____
o P
S Landard
Pi Lot
Cp , /7
P S-Type Pitot C
Aleci B leq
A
B
. -
/ o
I . c7
/ L/(
/ co
?r. 7.
71L
1 Y7 /1i 1( ,
?JCi7
c /2
/ 2/
-
/ 3
-
7l x
.
/ 2 I
/.
. 7 ? r
( L
7 ?
-
SIt,
c ;; η
- ->-
7 ,c__
9/5_
.
c
,
L/Q
._______ c __
,; o
c
(,C1
G ?
, 9-.
.
9
ccc:
?Q L
.
. c -/
I_____________
30c_
-
o . C -/
3c )c
c C72
c2.
_____________________________________ ..1
2
a
-QL
Leg Average Cp
- 9% /77
Calibraciori Da:e:
-------
APPENDIX D
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DATA
-------
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
BUILDING 53, BOX 25227, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER
DENVER, COLORADO 80225
TO Mr. Paul dePercin DATE December 2, 1977
Field Operations Branch
FROM
Deputy Chief
Chemistry Branch
SUBJECT Detection Limits for L.A. Source Test Data
The data transmitted on October 14, 1977, included less than values for
the particulate acetone, organic and inorganic impinger samples. All
weighings were performed on an analytical balance to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Positive results for the blank samples are from random contamination
during sample collection, handling and analysis. It is important that
results not be reported as real when in fact the positive values are
from contamination. This possibility is minimized by determining the
detection limit based on the determined blank values.
The detection limit is calculated by adding two standard deviations
(95% confidence level) of the blank values to the mean of the blank
values. If the mean blank is subtracted from all results, then this
value is exclude. from the detection limit. Typically, only a few
blank measurements are made and one high blank value can bias the de-
tection limit. However, this will provide a conservative reporting of
positive values. If any error is made, it will be on the side of not
reporting some real values, but will guard against reporting values as
real that resulted from contamination.
Mark Carter
cc: Meigqs
Young
-------
. Al . S .. . Y . 1 . ..
DATES COVERED
27ia -
SAMPLE
:u: 3ER
STATION DESCRIPTION
TINE
-
P R1IC TC
ANA
lP u n
LYSES PERFOR : .IED
7 u - c LAar S i I
.\ I J _ , .
1
:.i i i
OiL
r
ru -r:.
.
/ O/ -OZ -O /O
I
C31/
S .O
fO
..
/ S0 1 -03 -o jo
i o, -o/-o I!
I I
I
.
-. Jo 5
2 5
...Lc 1 o2____
/ OI-OZ.-C IO
F,cLo
-_________
.
74-O
; .c_ Cr tsJi/ fl p η &
I
Z)t.10! C.:
-------
II rage_________
DATES COVERED q/,o / /77
NAME OF SURVEY (.il. S, L(fcp
\NIL .CAL .A TI.... . CR .
FIELD DATA
. SAMPLE NO.
STATION DESCRIPTION
TIME
ANALYSES PERFORMED
L - l 1 t ;. 1 f
I
,,, . ,
t
S t
) OI-O(-c j
i- c :( C .
37
(Ir
/
(2.
I
30
(2o/- 2 o ic
c34η
(2..
14-
( o)-O 3io
wo
9;
( PO1 . . O4. O i,j
( OI -01. O?fo - -
S
-------
i-.. . -.. ii - I j) 4
Attacnment II
METHOD 5 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
FRO 1 STATIONARY SOURCES
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Filters
The filters to be tared are desiccated at 20 ±560C (68 ±100F) and
ambient pressure for at least 24 hours and weighed at 6 or more hour
intervals to a constant weight, i.e.°j
-------
1)- 5
After at least 24 hours in the evaporating tunnel, beakers are
removed and placed into dessicators using drierite as the dessicant.
The beakers remain in the dessicator for at least 24 hours and weighed
to a constant weight. The final weights are reported using a single
pan analytical balance calibrated against Class S weights. Room
temperature and humidity are measured during the dessication and
weighing process.
No filters or acetone residues are discarded after analysis. The
residue from the beakers are rinsed with a minimal amount of acetone
back into the mason jars in which they were collected.
The filters and residues along with their respective sample tags
are stored in a predetermined place for at least a year.
P.a , Data B-ench Cards
Orno
J)74jp; ,OAI
JT r
,( T(Z
P/rr,.o! ;V 3 -
.
3 PU
I
1 4t411C .V /.(T(
I I 1I,tC1 Nt,I 61 ?
I .iJ...CCTf. _ . I I I
f i rc I I ,, re I I r,,,, .e_
I- -7 I .c? t 7 j 7AC I V$7
, I ?V1/ J. iv I
O,i,o T I JEd
w, ., rr
?i T ,P7Uj )
J 7197 ,,o, 1 To . :
/f .c ..b
It
f Q t(//CC
C NJ .f L . i/ui .
I .i I I
p:.. o (
,, t I 4 T, . 0 i.e gi7 1 S( C I F/.6Qb I t/M.Q6
79 c I N(r
I i v e.r. 46 w .r ( ,.,y I
Field and Laboratory Blanks
Field filter blanks are collected and weighed one in every ten
samples with a minimum of two if less than ten filters are collected.
Acetone blanks are collected and analyzed at approximately the same
rate as the filters. In addition, laboratory blanks are analyzed during
each batch analysis.
-------
U-b
Attachment III
PARTICULATES AND SULFATES ON WATER IMPINGERS
General
The impinger solutions are received in quart jars with Teflon lined caps.
After logging sample in, the volume in each jar is measured and a 250 ml
aliquot is removed for analysis.
Analysis
Particulates
a) Total - transfer the 250 ml aliquot into a desiccated and tared 250 ml
beaker, place in 90°C oven until dry.
b) Organic - transfer the 250 ml aliquot into a 500 ml separatory funnel
and extract 3 consecutive times with 20 ml aliquots of chloroform,
collecting the chloroform extract in a desiccated and tared 100 ml
beaker. Evaporate the chloroform extract to dryness by blowing a small
stream of nitrogen over it in a hood.
c) Inorganic - transfer aqueous portion of (b) into a desiccated and tared
250 ml beaker. Place in 90°C oven until dry.
Place and leave dry beakers in a desiccator using (indicating desiccant)
for at least 24 hours and until the gross weight of each beaker is
stabilized.
Sul fates
100 ml of deionized distilled water was added to each beaker. The beakers
were Swirled gently, covered with parafilm and allowed to equilibrate for
24 hours before aliquots were removed for sulfate analysis. (Described on
follo ,,ing page.)
-------
0-7
-2-
Methodol6gy for Sulfate Analysis
Sulfate analyses were performed according to Method 8 (Federal Register,
Vol. 42, No. 160 -Thursday, August 18, 1977 , pp. 41785-41789). Briefly,
the method is as follows:
Into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask was placed:
1. A known aliquot of sample
2. Deionized distilled water bringing the volume to 25 ml
3. 100 ml of isopropanol
4. 4 drops of thorin indicator
This orange solution was titrated to a pink endpoint usirg a 0.01 N barium
perchlorate solution.
Each day the Ba(C10 4 ) 3 solution was standardized against a 0.01 N H 2 S0 4
standard solution which had been standardized against a 0.01 N NaOH
standard solution.
-------
AIR - SOURCE TESTIUG FOR PARIICULAIES AnD SUL A1ES
SULFATES FINAL RESULTS
SAMPLE INFORMATION
PART ICU I AlES
£idr nIL
SAIIPLE #
_ ThP
2. . LL
DESCRIPTIO n
lOiN.
VOLUMI
I
T I
ALIQUO
USED
.?
BEAKER I
-
GROSS WI.
-
T
TARE WI.
11(1 wr
-&- - -r
Ά ,r
AI PL(
i\LIQuO
1L
IITRAI11
.
LtlIT!AL
(SO 4 )
- .-_-_ _
D I I
ACTOR
TOrN.
SO
-
- -.
SAIl VOL
LIiflJ To
- rr:
lOIN.
SO
ni c i.
TOTAL
PARTIC
-------
APPENDIX E
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
-------
I I VtJ 4LI1A t
ENVIRO(;MEUTAL PROTECTIOU AGENCY
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROCEDURES
June 1, 1975
GENERAL
The evidence gathering portion of a survey should be characterized by the minimum
number of samples required to give a fair representation of the water, air or solid
waste sampled. To the extent possible, the quantity of samples and sample locations
will be determined prior to the survey.
Chain of Custody procedures must be follotied to maintain the documentation nacessary
to trace sample possession from the time taken until the evidence is introduced into
court. A sample is in your custody if:
1. It is in your actual physical possession, or
2. It is in your view, after being in your physical possession, or
3. It was in your physical possession and then you locked it up in a manner so
that no one could tamper with it.
All s:arvey participants :ill receive a copy of the survey study plan and will be
kno iledgeable of its contents prior to the survey. A pre-survey briefing ,ill be held
to re-appraise all participants of the survey objectives, sample locations and Chain
of Custody procedures. After all Chain of Custody samples are collected, a de-briefing
will be held in the field to determine adherence to Chain of Custody procedures and
whether additional evidence type samples are required.
SA!1PLE COLLECTION
1. To the maximum extent achievable, as few people as possible should handle
the sample.
2. Water, air, or solid waste samples shall be obtained, using standard field
sampl ing techniques.
3. Sample tags (Exhibit I) shall be securely attached to the sample container
at the time the complete sample is collected and shall contain, at a minimum,
the following information: station number, station location, data taken,
time taken, type of sample, sequence number (first sample of the day
sequence IIo. 1, second sample - sequence No. 2, etc.), analyses required and
samplers. The tags must be legibly filled out in ballpoint (waterproof ink).
4. Blank samples shall also be taken with preservatives :hich will be analyzed
by the laboratory to exclude the possibility of container or preservative
contariri nation.
5. A pro-printed, bound Field Data Record logbook shall be maintained to re-
cord field measurements and other pertinent information necessary to refresh
the samplers memory in the event he later takes the stand to testify re-
garding his actions during the evidence gathering activity. A separate
set of field noteboo :s shall be maintained for each survey and stored in a
safe place where they could Le pro tec ted arid accounted for at all tii:iCs.
Standard formats (Exhihits 11 and III) have been established to nhinimize
field entries r d 1 ricluc e the date, tire, survey, type of samples taken,
vol UlO of each s h ipl C, type of a na lys is, s r.pl C numbers, preserva t 1 yes,
Srrahil e 1 oca t i Cii and f i el d incas u rcmeri ts such as tcr ipercl ture conduc Liv i ty,
-------
E-2
2
DO, pH, flow and any other pertinent information or observations. The
entries shall be signed by the fiel sampici. The preparation and conser-
vation of the field logbooks during tie survey will be the responsibility
of the survey coordinator. Once the survey is complete, field logs will be
retained by the survey coordinator, cr his designated representative, as a
part of the permanent record.
6. The field sampler is responsible for :he care and custody of the samples
collected until properly dispatched : the receiving laboratory or turned
over to an assigned custodian. lie r. st assure that each container is in his
physical possession or in his vie i a: all times, or locked in such a place
and manner that no one can tamper wi:r it.
7. Colored slides or photographs should e taken which would visually show the
outfafl sample location and any wate- oollution to substantiate any con-
clusions of the investigation. Wriz:en documentation on the back of the
photo should include the signature c the photographer, time, date and site
location. Photographs of this nature, which may be used as evidence, shall
be handled recognizing Chain of Custc:y procedures to prevent alteration.
TRAI1SFER OF CUSTODY A 1D SH1P E1 T
1. Samples will be accompanied by a Chai i of Custody Record which includes the
name of the survey, samplers sionet es, station number, station location,
date, time, type of sac ole, sequence u oer, number of containers and an3iy
ses required (Fig. IV). When turnin; over the possession of samples, the
transferor and transferee will sign, ete and time the sheet. This record
sheet allows transfer of custody of group of samples in the field, tothe
mobile laboratory or when samples are dispatched to the 1EiC Denver labora-
tory. When transferring a portion o the samples identified on the sheet to
the field mobile laboratory, the indiidual samples must be noted in the
column with the signature of the pers:i relinquishing the samples. The field
laboratory person receiving the sampes will acknowledge receipt by signing
in the appropriate column.
2. The field custodian or field sampler, if a custodian has not been assigned,
will have the responsibility of propely packaging and dispatching samples
to the proper laboratory for analysis. The Dispatch portion of the Chain
of Custody Record shall be properly filled out, dated, and signed.
3. Samples will be properly packed in s pment containers such as ice chests, to
avoid breakage. The shipping containers will be padlocked for shipment to
the receiving laboratory.
4. All packages will be accompanied by t-e Chain of Custody Record showing iden-
tification of the contents. The oricnal will accompany the shipment, and a
copy will be retained by the survey coordinator.
5. II sent by mail , register the packace with return receipt requested. If sent
by common carrier, a Government Bill :f Lading should be obtained. Receipts
from post offices, and bills of ladir; will be retained as part of the perma-
nent Chain of Custody documentation.
6. If samples arc delivered to the laboratory ihen appropriate personnel are not
there to receive them, the samples r st be locked in a designated area within
the laboratory in a manner so that r one can tamper ii th then. The sam2 per-
son must then return to the laboratcr; and unlock the sanples and deliver
custody to the appropriate custodian.
-------
E- 3
3
LABORATORY CUSTODY PROCEDURES
1. The laboratory shaH designate a sample custodian. An alternate will be
designated in his absence. In addition, the laboratory shall set aside a
sample storage security area. This should be a clean, dry, isolated room
which can be securely locked from the outside.
2. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons.
3. All incoming samples shall be received only by the custodian, who will in-
dicate receipt by signing the Chain of Custody Sheet accoipanying the samples
and retaining the sheet as pernenent records. Couners picking up samples at
the airport, post office, etc. shall sign jointly with the laboratory custodian.
4. Immediately upon receipt, the custodian will place the sample in the sample
roam, which will be locked at all times except when samples are removed or
replaced by the custodian. To the maximum extent possible, only the custo-
dian should be permitted in the sample room.
5. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive or lightsensitive samples,
or other sample materials having unusual physical characteristics, or re-
quiring special handling, are properly stored and maintained.
6. Only the custodian will distribute samples to personnel who are to perform
tests.
7. The analyst will record in his laboratory notebook or analytical worksheet,
identifying information describing the sample, the procedures performed
and the results of the testing. The noLes shall be dated and indicate who
performed the tests. The notes shall be retained as a permanent record in
the laboratory and should note any ab iormalties which occurred during the
testing procedure. In th event that the person who performed the tests is
not available as a witness at tire of trial, the government may be able to
introduce the notes in evidence under the Federal Business Records Act.
8. Standard methods of laboratory analyse shall be used as described in the
Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for Analysis of Pollutants,
38 F.R. 28758, October 16, 1973. If laboratory personnel deviate from
standard procedures, they should be prepared to justify their decision dur-
ing cross-examination.
9. Laboratory personnel are responsible for the care and custody of the sample
once it is handed over to them and should be prepared to testify that the
sample ias in their possession and view or secured in the laboratory at all
times from the moment it was received from the custodian until the tests
were run.
10. Once the sample testing is completed, the unused portion of the sample to
geth r with all identifying tags and laboratory records, should be returned
to the custodian. Thc returned tagged sample will be retained in the sample
room until it is required for trial. Strip charts and other tiocumentation
of work siill also be turned over to the custodian.
11. Samples, tags and laboratory records of tests may be destroyed only upon the
order of the laboratory director, who will first confer with the Chief,
Enforccrnent Specialist Office, to make certain that the information is no
longer required or the samples have deteriorated.
-------
E -4
EXHIBIT I
EPA, NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Sl tion No. Dab Time Sequence No.
Slation Location ________Grab
Comp.
________BOD J, otals RomarksJPro. orvative:
_______Solids ________Oil Greaso
_____COD D.O.
Nutrients _________Bad.
________Other.
Samplers:
Front
/_
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT IN/ESTIGATIONS CENTER
BUILDING 53, BOX 25227, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER
DENVER, COLORADO 80225
,,
flat
Back
-------
(
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office Of Enforcement
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTtGATIONS CENTER
Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
;; (-.1
.._,, I
1 / . ..
I -
E-5
SUR Y /) /
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STATION
NUM
STATION LOCATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE TYPE
SEQ.
NO.
I
NO. OF
CONTAINERS
ANALYSIS
REQUIRED
Water
Comp. Grab.
Air
C L
) I
L i
/ :)
φ I
!
; .-
I .
>
I L c
r
I
1
C
1 .
k; o
It
.( .
1
I .
_ \
I
i c:_,
:.;
..
..
... .i
..
I
.-.-
...,
I
1
I
/
L
, . . ,. I.. --
-
t
/ L
/
(
I
/
Relinquished by: (Signature)
-p --. ..
. . .-:- : .. -
Received by: (Signature)
Dote/Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
.
Received by: ( ignoturej
Date/Time
Relinquished by.: (Signatv;e)
Received by: (Signature)
Dote/Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by Mobile Laboratory for field
analysis: (Signature)
Date/Time
Dispatched by: (Signature) Date/Time Received for Laboratory by:
1 / .;
-
Date/Time
/
. . /.
Method of Shipment: .
...
Distribution:
Orig._ Accompany Shipment
I Copy Survey Coordinator Field Files
*GpO 679-040
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office Of Enforcement
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Distribution: Orig. Accompany Shipment
1 Copy Survey Coordinator Field Files
[ -6
SURVEY
i . . ,,.. --
SAMPLERS: (Signoti,re)
STATION
STATION LOCATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE TYPE
co ?. s
ANALYSIS
Water
Comp. Grob.
.
/ : 0
-L
- - . .
..
I. . .
;
-
- :
./.--.. --.&/
.
:.
Y-
:2
...
Relinquished by: (Signature) -
1 / I ,_
Received by: (Signature)
Date/Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Eignoture)
Date/Time
Relinquished by.: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
Date/Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by Mobile Laboratory for field
analysis: (signature)
Date/Time
Dispatched by: (Signature) Date/Time Received for Laboratory by:...
S..., .
Date/Time
,
Method of Shipment: ... -
.
*GPO 679040
-------
APPENDIX F
PRODUCTION DATA AND PROCESS WEIGHT CALCULATIONS
-------
i eFinery ProLe DaLd
.
Name.
Date:_________
_______ - . -__n_.
- - - - -
asa - - -. - -
r
-- -.
a .. .,. - ,Aa,tr - -
r
.
..
-
-___ _,..
ca,aa.a
n,sa. .ag.
% 4&fltSJ W1
-
----
-I ,
.--
_ _* __
-. ----
--
--
-
Clock
T i me
Oil (bbls)
FCC Feed
Ai r(cfm)
CO Boiler
Air Feed Gas BTU Val
ESP
Primary Primary Secondary Spark
Voltage AmDeraae Amperage Rate
I- . ( 1 1
-_ :_..
E .13
(((a 3
r .-_-.a_. .
3 ) -j±c. 7
LLL
-
LL
.z
-
-.
*-. -
L L
L i
L
-
--
-r
.
-
-------
Clock
i i me
Refinery Process Data
Name:, - _ ;
Da t e: /9/ -
r(;i, c:I:
A
j-L. I1c . . Ό η z
FCC Feed ; i 1U CO Boiler
Fr - c( ,
Oil(bbls) Feed Gas BTU Val
1) -b.
,
? ( )
D
Primary
Vol taqe
- ;: r
/ - i 4 /i9.
1 ii. iTCL
ESP 4 v - C2 IZL JΌT
Primary Secondary Spark
Amperaqe Amperage Rate
5! ,
___/, -,--
,-7-
S .
2
7z
2. L
- j(T4
2L_
gc; Mc:
. i
-
, -,
5-
3_ c
3 5A
7L
56
/69.
/& .7.. ..
/ r
L(I_.
-.
-n
-------
F-3
7? ,._IJr, P C r ( :- Q
Z et. , II TL1 I T 1111
- - - - /O -flc , rYnr
c . c 4 __ - / t c c - f - - -
- - -
c r C/C -
- - - 4. I - - - , r - - - - --
o /. 4 r
j4 - -
- - / : - -
19 4 :c -
- - - - .
, / 2 cO ,foc& -. -
- -
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST DATA AND EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
-------
- --
R 90 *TeO VAL C /Si
V#il.ue 138
1 f 904 t1? 1 & 41QC
6LA,iIt
Q VJ
l&gic H
6/A ,Jk C
V / ve
e. ci,e,i,C
p,gRr,-c , .A,-e (- -)
-
______ ( c 9 )
s T
4_
_ c. j )
4o
3/
- ---- - - - - -,
f r 4r, b A. / J )/
f.LP$tt .
2,r
: -
VI
L-
o.s-
- - - - -
70
-
rn
-I
/2 /9 J r
0 0
t ---H-9
-s_ 0 0
i v r
--;_
1/ nO
-------
G- 2
P 0 cue e/ .tc ,L C0.
___
4ce ci-e euA 4 lit - 20 // 2 C / =
.r:- o. -38
u,ei
5
i ieoce iirS
/9 ?
/5/- /3o ;J
.77
2
Acel-o,-e (AAf 4
totAL
/ 3
Z opS -) Aeocet ecs i
dtce7 o,J( i 4 /3?
41
I, 7 , 7 eA
/,7
7
0
2
3 I
/10
.2
-------
Cd4rC.1 ( )
VGt (1 C 54#, eD
- Ccp e , r4?-, d
/03
/o7
G- 3
Pawe#ti,ve oie (..-5r4 -- ,,u/j /
I E,,- 1YJ b,%J (.,s e r# 4r,r, ; I
AA,P) Aoa .c
/56
/0?5 -
- 14f - - - -i, -- - - .
P 1 cit7c . 1 src ? 4 (, )
L6 ,.ie YAe .1e (, ,7)
C c t t (44,3;
A4etAeP rc ) Pgocc v,eeS
3
/.o,.z
,-w
. f 5-
f/ i
i /7?
/87
V,n e_5,9n ,1e. - /o3
/ g ,
/ Ά 5r
fir
I 3 Of
-------
G-4
Vm - volume of gas metered ________ Ft 3
- barometric pressure _____________ in Hg
- average orifice pressure - in H 2 0
Tm - average meter temperature _____________
V 1 volume of water collected _____________ml
CO 2 - concentration of CO 2 _____________
02 - concentration of 02 . -- -
CO - concentration of CO
C - Pitot ttibe coefficient
averaye velocity pressure _______________
average stack temperature
Ps average stack pressure _______________
As area of the stack
Theta - sample time
An area of the nozzle
ms weight collected
H energy input
Plant
Unit
---7
,1
e- -- --. -
(
Location
Run No.
,
ccc
/ T /
Date
1c2, cc
, . 1 C)
5c_5_ 5 -
/ 6- 7
/5 2
C
C c -77
-
a,
zV6 - /tJ - /77
in H 2 0
in H 2 0
Ft 2
mi n.
Ft 2
mg
1o BTUs
-------
G-5
Location
RunNo. ______
Date
1. Meter Volume
VmS d = 17.65
I ____
Vm LPb+13.6
[ Tm
= 17.65 (yt.99)
j .r9 Ft 3
2. Volume of water collected
V , = .0472 V 1
= .0472
(/c . )
Ft 3
3. floisture
= V /(V ,, + VmS d)
,oV /(5&Y +J 9)
= J- )
, I., 0
4. Dry Molecu
M d =
lar Weight
.44 (CD 2 ) + .32 (02) + .28 (N 2 + CO)
=.44 )+.32(2 -)+.28(r2.3 )
=J , 53 1j/lb-mole
Plant
Unit
-------
5. Wet Molecular Weight
= d (1 B 5 ) + 18 (B ,s)
=j $3(1 i ) + 18 (, )
o lb/ lb-mole
6. Stack Gas Velocity
= (85.48) C , sfAP -
v Ps Ms
85.48 (o. ) (.29c,)
/r 7 Ft/sec
7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate
3600 (1- Bws)rtJ As [ r j L29.92 1
= 3600 (1- , / z ) ηz ,) fr&? ) 152 1 f io. Y21
[ 29 . 92 j
= / 7X/t, Ft 3 /hr
8. Isokinetic
IS [ (.00267) + Vm
60 (Theta),. 1 y 5 P 5 A
= 100 (i r) [ (.00267) ( ) (i + ___
( - ; : ;- ) 13.6
60 ( c9 ) (/ .Y) (; -v 2 ) (oe o9 )
= [ 9y7o } ( i r + 2.o )
( .275/ )
/03
G-6
2
-------
G- 7
8. Mass Emission Rated
c
t4ER = ( cis) (Qs) -
C - (VmStd) (453.59)
= (dyG) 7ooOc 7 )
c Z JT453.59)
= /5O lbs/hr
IER = ( ins) (Q!J _
C - (VmStd) (453.59)
( ii ) (
(,o.vq) (453.59
lbs/hr
U..
MERC -
(.r?) (i ±
= 152 T453 59 )
= /9.2 lbs/hr
-------
G-8
J 3 .o
- /5?
L2.9
C)
,,,
-
93y.
;c 92
- 5 22C
7 I.
_ c2 o Y5
_ 99 -/29- , 2τ
Location
Run No.
- Date
Hg
H 2 0
Plant 2_e .
Unit , C
V - volume of gas metered
- barometric pressure
- average orifice pressure
Tm average meter temperature
V 1 volume of water collected
CO 2 - concentration of CO 2
02 - concentration of 02
Co concentration of Co
C - Pitot tube coefficient
average velocity pressure
average stack temperature
Ps average stack pressure
As area of the stack
Theta - sample time
An area of the nozzle
nis weight collected
H energy input
Ft 3
in
in
ml
in 1120
in H 2 0
Ft 2
mi n.
Ft 2
mg
106 BTUs
-------
6-9
Plant
Unit
/r /
1. Meter Volume
VmS d =
2. Volume of
vw
3. Moisture
Location ____
Run No. ________
I3c .96 + 13.6
L -v3
B , 5 = V f(V + VmStd)
5/Z /( -y. +3YcC)
=
4. Dry Molecular Weight
M d = .44 (c0 2 ) + .32 (02) + .28 + co)
= 44 (,19.2)+ .32 (c )+.28 (r 9 )
= o.3/ Th/lb-mole
Date
17.65 Vm
+ 13.6
Tm
= 17.65 (j o6 )
= Ft 3
water collected
= .0472 V 1
= .0472
=
(//yr )
Ft 3
-------
G-10
5. Wet Molecular Weight
Md (1 B 5 ) + 18 (B ., 5 )
=. 3/(1 . 1 z) + 18 ( .12 )
2J 73 1b/lb-mole
6. Stack Gas Velocity
= (85.48) C s/ P -
v Ps Ms
(U-)
= 85.48 ( 1X) (,;O/ ) /(io. 2) ( 2f )
Ft/sec
7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate
[ Ps
= 3600 (1- Bws)rtJ As L29.92 1
= 3600 (1-. ,2 ) ( o . a) (5 ) 1 rJ 92
[ 93iJ [ 29.92]
= / IT ,X/O Ft 3 /hr
8. Isokinetic
100 T 5 [ (.00267) VIC + - - (P +
Tm
=
60 (Theta), j . 5 A ,. 1
= 100 ( ij ) [ (.00267) (/, r) + ( ) (3 41 + ____
__________ 13.6
60 (Y/) ( .2o.2) (3c 4 ) (.ooc.7S
= ( 5 i co ) ( . 5o7 + z./9 )
(a3 2 -3 )
=
-------
G-1 1
8. Mass Emissibn Rate;
= ( ras) (Q. ) _
C - (Vmstd) (453.59)
- ( oc y) r -D cc
) (453.59
9 lbs/hr
t C
HER = ( ns) (Qs )
C (VmStd) (453.59)
= C,.?q) (/t5ooiio
( -n;o ) (453.59
= /3 lbs/hr
tIERC -( 4 3.59T
(,LW) (irsc j..
= (yiZ F(453.59)
= I 13 lbs/hr
-------
Vm - volume of gas metered
- barometric pressure
M1 average orifice pressure
Tm average meter temperature
V 1 - volume of water collected
CO 2 - concentration of CO 2
02 concentration of 02
CO concentration of CO
C , Pitot tube coefficient
average velocity pressure
T 5 average stack temperature
Ps average stack pressure
As area of the stack
Theta - sample time
An area of the nozzle
ms weight collected
H energy input
y, 31
-p
p . 5 - )
YJr
fT2
-,
, _,
o -7
t!. C C
9V3
,22j77
-_________
Ty
oao 75
2 1 Ia ?- /70
Plant
Unit
.
,C /a
Location
Run No.
3
C- 12
Date 9 J,/4P 7
Hg
H 2 0
Ft 3
in
in
ml
in 1120
in H 0
Ft 2
mi n.
Ft 2
mg
106 BTUs
-------
G-1 3
Location _____________
Run No. . 3 Date
1. Meter Volume
VrnS d = 17.65
I _____
Vm Vb+136
Lim
= 17.65 (Y 3/ )
= y; - Ft 3
2. Volume of
vw
3. Moisture
water collected
.0472 VLC
= .0472
=
(28 7)
Ft 3 -
V /(V + VmStd)
IC
4. Dry Molecular Weight
Md = .44 (c0 2 ) + .32 (02) + .28 2 + CO)
= .44 Q. )+ .32 (i: ) + .28 (θ .2Y )
= 30.5V 1k/lb-mole
Plant
Unit
+ )
-------
G-l 4
5. Wet Molecular Weight
M d (1 B ) + 18 (Bus)
= y s ( 1 - + 18 ( /2 )
, ci1b/1b-mole
6. Stack Gas Velocity
= (85.48) C f P -
v Ps Ms
( i j)
= 85.48 (. )
/2 T5 Ft/sec
7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate
r 52 [ PS
= 3600 (1 B , 5 ),- j- As L29.92 1
= 3500 (1- ) @i,-) ( .&) 152 12 5?7J
L J [ 29.92j
= A /0 Ft 3 /hr
8. Isokinetic
100 Is [ (.00267) VIC +
W
60 (Theta),. j. 5 P A
100 (9V3) [ (.00267) ( ?) + ( 3 L ) ( yc+ ___
(s.3i) ___ 13.6
60 Cr4 ) (ars) (A?. 7 )
= f q; ) ( 2 + ?i/ )
(2e7 )
= /o/. 2..
-------
G-15
8. Mass Emission Rate
-O;
MER = ( ns) (Qs )
C (VmStdJ ( .59)
(.o i) (/ -ooecc
7 Z 7 453.59)
= lbs/hr
:
tIER = ( cis) (Qs )
C - (VmStd) (453.59)
= ( /07) (, c
r2 R453 .59
= 1/ lbs/hr
j . j. . ;r)
(cis) (Qs) ____
t 1 J t53 . 5 _ ) _
(/50) i cc
453.5w
= /3. lbs/hr
-------
G- 16
Pce,,e a,I £. -/7 i.t,bI /TO/
59 sq.j 1t.A$
(c ltecreb 4
qce 1 ,-c c1.4 7..r # ,
I
fO L
5A - Le .Lu C (Jrp)
; 5.39
502 CQ Jce, r At,D, J I
I I I
- - -- - ---
.
__ _ L rL_-L__-L- °- -
Vv(e.ierAtc Pc.. I Id c D ,cIc#, Il
To,
- _L _ _L _ L_ ____________U____ ______ -_____
1cp_ IE tt I
/3P k,4fr I
::t iit i
T jotC Fe. , itef Ave.e.47r Op 4/.# IJ /.1, 113 I
-------
ULL EL !)
VERY I tIORTANT FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Time______
End Time________
, ?C- 5
Ambient Temp F______________
Bar. Press. Hg_______________
Assumed oisture Z_____________
Probe Tip Dia. In.____________
Pitot Tube No. // 2
Probe Length/type______________
Filter No. 4/ ._______ ______
Plant
Run NO.,g
Location Liz L
Date
7, -,
Operator________________________
Sample Box No. 2
Meter Box No. .2
Meter A H. /.
,,,
CJ.lctor
I
t / v 1 : iT TeA L fr ) C
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pitot
in. 1120
AP
Orifice M I
in 1120
Dry Cas Temp.
F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
F
Stack
Temp.
F
(°F+460)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
4.1.1
0,/
C
:2
dC7
3
cc
o.O
,
Ef
4 yt .
5-
___
(
C . 7
7
2r-
c.c 7
,r
91V
crr
9
(.C
PX
1o
e
4 ,9°
- II
co?
9
,
c 1
1
3o
/3
If,
I
I
Cor ents:
-------
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Tire I i7 -
End Time_________________
Ambient Temp °F q
Bar. Press. Hg .2 Z
Assumed ?!oisture Z /4 /
Probe Tip Dia. In. .37 /
Pitot Tube No.______________
Probe Length/type /C, 4
Filter No.j _______ ______
PARTICUL IELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT FILT. IN ALL BLANKS
Plant i_eό.-. J
Run No. / /fd /
LocaL ion 9 . 1
Date
operato e -i , ., -Vj
Sa ,ple Box No. .2
Meter Box No. 2
Meter / 9.r
C , aFactor
PiLot
Orifice AH ,
Dry Gas Temp.
Pump
Impinger
Oven
lrobe
Stack
Stack
Point
L &,
ct y
4-/9
.3
Clock
: s7
.v3
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
i z
J. 9 .37
/ Z/ιc
J 7!2 l6
in. 1120
P
.
O(a
τ. 7
in 1120
Vacuum
In. Hg
r
C
0
Temp.
°F
0 C
7
;(i
Temp. Temp. Temp.
F °F °F
2c Y 26 ?
q ;f,
Temp.
0 K
(°F+460)
Desired [ Actual
/5 )/y
I____
I,4(
$ 9 1 ,5 -5
Outlet
L
Z
?2
Inlet
1c.4
.2
9;:
p.
ii
?Y
J2;5c
12 Lc7 /
.
.c ,zI.t-z
/ .6 V
?2
9
/
9/
Fr
/
.2
1/
o
cr-
22- YZ
?
/o / 2 7c or
557 ?
72
?/
1.2
/V
, fr
r(
r/
.2 7i 3 4 9.2
2&2 /597
12 ri
(! .
, .2. .
91
9c
/ Y
-
r
s
7
1 Of
,3/J 7
, e
/ 6.A - 62.-
/ 9c
I V
Y
2 3
2..3 9?/
9,cY i : 1 L/L/
O C 7
7 (
I o
/ 3
C
2 5 2
97
9-
.ci , -fl
c.o.,
,4 η4J
( /
.3
f
i7
2L/f.
? ST
/
. i( ; (
E7L
*;
/.2_
f
2 )
T LL((
4
3 Lu1 Oc
i I 17 ?.L
. -L :) - .( 2
.c, ( -
r
?.: -
91
I ?t
. 3 Pt
3 ( ..k
C L(
C,
Corm enLs:
-------
Sheet .2. of )
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pitot
in. H 2 0
P
Orifice t H
in H 2 0
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
(°F+460)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
/
1/
V?8
- -
YL )-
9/
1. -
qp
9J5 47
-
,ti /,
ijac/-:
/V3:
, - ,,cj)
.j;-i7-_
KC
k1h.
)
kcTi ,t1;/4
,C
/C
.
3Iq
/:vo
/4 s3
5
p. .7
?
9
AC
T
2 c <-r7
//: q
/ fη 77
o2
c -S
C..59
2 /
c9
2o
CI_.
!
1:2
1/J
/V7e c
C c 7
c_cV
7
fC
/0
(3
p ;
ji
/- i
9 33
C.o r
ι2
I C 2
1/
rr
f
i0
/.
,95 ?
r
2
?
I
7/
T /
e
24 Y
55J
9
/1- c4
/5 e 97
C 7
2
, 2
7 ,
r
/ /
T c
9
-
(
1/,:51
/ . 3 c
C. C f
C, ι 2 2.
/ /
rc
. ? c
. c
sc I
?
/- 2 ;cf
/q-3. 7
7
O -ι / O 2
2 2
rc
, /
r$
. c-
S T >
. f
L,
/7 cr
f
r(
f7
A 2
? 3
- f
-3
,/2 c 7
jη , 3
. c f
- .2
J
5i
/,
q
/ 2 f( 1 /S2 74
cP 9
c & C 9
f e 7 /
/.7
ri
-2
2
47
q)
-J
0
Comments:
3/16 / 77
-------
-
Sheet I of 5
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pitot
in. H 2 0
AP
Orifice AH
in H 2 0
DLJ Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
(°F+460
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
1 .1
/.2;/3
Jη C
c-or
c. i
g
/
i.3
r
/97
)
/ (e Yf
c 9
6 T
c.6?
s c
?7
/9
?
, 3C
49c;
/
JX/9
J 1./. ?9
L Cf
2
O(c .2
7
/
r
J9
/92
L
x X
k
t c
o.
oc
( -
I
c
i. c
ss
L, ,
c, .
c yc ,- ,v
______
1
.
,
I
-
1\
:
C
cD
Comments:
3/16/77
-------
Plant: ______________
Add ress : L . &-
Station No.: / 7Z /
RunNo.:__________
Barometric Pressure:
Ambient Temperature:
_Sample Box Nuniber:_
Impinger 1
Impinger 2
Impinger 3
Im in r
ma Vo cke
I itia VolI m e
Vol e c llect d
/ /
/ 2Z
Total Volume Collected JC6, ,Y ml
Filters
No.
Final Weight
Tare t1 i _ . !
%leight
Collected
gni
gm
gm
gm
gm
gin
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
G-2 1
_______Date:
Operators:
Final Volume
Initial Volume
Volume collected
7/;
-LO
of
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
Final Volume // ,c (
Initial Volume /0 0
Volume collected / 1
of E LC )
Final Volume
Initial Volume
Volume collected
()
ml of Q.cv .η
ml
0
C)
ml
ml
N ml
\ml
S .-
Impi nger
Final weight ____
Initial weight
Weight col lected
gm of_________
gm
gm
Cleanup performed by
on
-------
Plant , j- 2
Run No. / r /
Location, X -,t
Date
../( )
OperatO.r
Sanple Box No. 2
Meter Box No. 2
MaterA}4______________
9 .Factor 7
UL! LD
VERY IMPUKTANT FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Time i7 i ?
End Time
c -k
Ambient Temp F 71
Bar. Press. Hg_______________
Assumed oisture % /9
Probe Tip Dia. In. 3 7 /
Pitot Tube No. /C 2
Probe Length/type____________
Filter No.______ _______ ______
C,
I )
Corrents:
-------
Co imcnts:
Impinge r
Temp.
°F
Sheet of
Oven
Temp.
Probe
Temp.
Stack
Temp.
Stack
Temp.
(°F+46C
N)
(A)
3/16/ 77
-------
Sheet 3 oE
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pitot
in. H 2 0
P
Orifice H
in H 2 0
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven.
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
(°F+460
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
//
i. b
cO i
O.(
8/
()
L (
,23L
Z 12 .5
7(
/737
ZL)I. j
0.0
O,(c C
(
O
I.
c: 7
-fir
/
/73
O.C(
81
C)
I -f
7
2.C . ./
225
/- 7
LG,4 t
( 4 I
( ) /(
1Y7
U.
)(j
.(g9
7i:
.. rfliic
0,
, 0
,
.-
Comr ents:
3/16/77
I ,
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SFtEET
P1 ant: , . / Date: c %- e/7 7
Addressf _ T ____Operators:
Station No.:__________________________ ________________
Run No.: Ambient Temperature: 9
Barometric Pressure: Sample Box Number:__________
Impinger 1
Final Volume i?g ml of / /
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected 92/ in]
Impinqer 2
Final Volume /1 2 _ - ml of J. c i.
Initial Volume / ( ml
Volume collected / .a ml
Impinqer 3
Final Volume________ ml of j
Initial Volume______ ml
Volume collected ml
Impi nger
Fih. 1 Volum ______ ml of__________________________
Jnit F& .j Volume____ ml
Volume collected in
Impi nqer
Final weight g 7 z gm of _______
Initial weight(:G/, gm
Weight collected /-. 2 gm
Total Volume Collected//I/ f ml
Filters
Weight
No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected
I, / 7
_________ ___________gin _________gin ________gin
__________ ____________gm __________gin _________gin
Cleanup performed by_ on
-------
G-25
Molecular Weight Determination
Station Number ____________
tlethod of Analysis: Fryrite
Orsat
Sample Type: rab
Integrated
V
I
Run
No.
Tim2
CO 2
02
CO
Collected Analyzed
i
1/30
& / -
2.7J2 /
,,,
.
-
ft 7 3c
, ,
i OJ (2Jfq
4 i/c. /
.
Leak Check:
02 Check ________________° against _______
CO 2 Check _________________% against ________
Signature:_____ ______ Date:
Remarks:
-------
t J
Run No.
Location ;J4. 7t
Date
Op e rat o rj .&
Sample Box o. 2
Meter Box No. 2.
MeterAH / ;f
C,flactor
I UL! :LD
VERY I? 1ORTAT FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Tiwe______________
End Tiwe__________________
Aathient Tern? °F
Bar. Press. Hg_______________
Msurne ? oisture Z /9
Probe Tip Dia. In. C ..37 /
Pitot Tube No. ,i
P robe Length/type At i .ii I
Filter No. f_,
f 5_ ) A /- QKc$ )/ /fη
C,
N.)
Conrenla:
-------
Sheet oE
Point
I
Clock
Dry Gas
Neter, CF
Pitot
in. H 2 0
P
Orifice H
in H 2 0
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
(°F+460
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
i21
t 9 iV
f 1Q9
/// 2-
.L o).
k27 i3?
OIO
i
C o
u1/ (CI1
O
Ό(
7 (
/7A
7.Y
00/
/3
7 7V) ,
)9f
;;i /7,
(
____
,
- /,
/ , η
cη
0 oi
. c z
7
7?
-i-_
5 3
.2
L7
fl7
- L
ici,?
o.o
c o
.( ;O
17
(
L
2 f
0
I (
/ Z.. I
; 2 1i. \
C). c 1 7
η L
. η
f, 3
S I
2 ( /
?/
//2 /
2 Y -47
o, &
. O
Q
1,3
f
11? ;L
,j ?
.
t. o
c
O
lG(
£ f7
c
i,
)3 :oL
D.o
, L o
.L-O
7 !
/Y
/
Q
7?o
Lf//
-
3
. 3c, c
0. ?
5 t
I o
1.3
O
η
L
-
1,2k
1(3?
; i74o
O.Oto
o.os
,t-j
7
./η-
37
7 i
I
79
i
/,).
I d
c
99
/ 7
L/
/ (L(9 .
9 39. (
o η
c i
n
?o
?o
/, /
. S?
-2 flY
Y ??
3
Z.
// 15 2 4 LiL( 0 Q
,i i i o.o
fl _ I 1? . l oc 1f
.37
7
,3C)
] 7
I .37
, . 3o
O
O
b
3 O
/
//
//
i o
b
?/
?i
L2 37
% , /?
vc*
L/7 L/ /
(
/9o(2 L Ck c -KC t) /°/L( oi-f r
Comments:
3/16/77 4 L1fZ
-------
G-28
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant: ,i L c. M( Date:
Addresszf s, .-te Operators: _
Station No.:__________________________ ______________________
Run No.: Ambient Temperature:____________
Barometric Pressure: ________________Sample Box Number:______________
Impinger 1
Final Volume______ ml of Ji .- irc ,r
Initial Volume____ ml
Volume collected - ml
Irnpinger 2
Final Volume )t)O ml of Sd
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected a ml
Impinger 3
Final Volume ml of_________________________
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected ml
1m inger
Final Volume ml of___________________________
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected ml
Impinger
Final weight gm of _ , £ .
Initial weight gm
Weight collected ? > gm
Total Volume Collected 9 7 ml
Filters
Wei ght
No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected
gin ____________gin __________gin
__________ ___________gm __________gm _________gin
Cleanup performed by on___________________
-------
G-2 9
Molecular Weiqht Determination
Station Number
Method of Analysis: Fryrite_
Sample Type: urab
Integrated
0 rs at
Run
? o.
T rne
( .02
02
CO
Collected
Analyzed
I
/ C
5 a
c;
2
/C: c
5 c
7
/cc
2 C
C
I
.
Leak Check:
02 Check ________________% against
CO 2 Check ________________% against
Signature:_____ __________________ Date: 67
Remarks:
- 7
-5
-------
Sar ple Box No.
Meter Box No.
Meter A
Cfla c to r
P JL! LD
VERY fl!PORTA T FILL IN ALL BLANKS Ambient Temp °F 5
Bar. Press. Hg_______________
Assumed ?toisture z /9
_____________ Probe Tip Die. In. -
Pitot Tube No.______________
Probe Length/type
Filter No./ -C,.g ,_______ ______
Plant !/
Rtm No.
Locat ion #e
Date
Operator
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Time______________
End Time
/
p h-
Tc?
or.
_ Tei4 la-
-/ II ,
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pitot
in. 1120
Orifice A l l
in 11 O
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Tenp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
°F
Probe
Tamp.
F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Tewp.
°F
(°F+460)
T
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
L cA
c7;q4
A-7 Ii q
e
. V.,, 3
)qs.
/
9
,5 C
. r
-
,r7
?
jc
,r7
.2c-9
2/
£/7V
j .2./ 7.
-7
. SO
.5
?
/ .
1- y
2 7 g .2 -
.50
.s
7V
J
/. )
?/
2.2-22.iq 5
___
5/ 52-
2s3. )/).j) ,
0 cr7
5° I ηi
c7/
/
12
r2.
1-
It)
Z)
)
252-
23 2
f6,
5
255 1
0 £9 ,
.
s °
2 1
?2
J. o
- j
2 5 .
£9 . j)
. U
. 50
3
/ 0
/
153
i c
/
25
i. o /
.3
.s V
,3
73
/_°
(
:2-5
2
4
V
e3O7
;t
7 i/
f3
/.V
/
)S7
7.3 qI
2 t 3 iS
L c a4 Lf
0
£9 9 /,,
9,
// He
. O
,5i) -
-r cc
- rc V/cS F,
7
g
7 .5
-
9 q
q
9 5
[ (i)
/ 0
Ic
/ L5/ 23
2. 2. 23
I
YtY
qgLJ
/
C)
Corents:
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
G-3 1
Plant:_______________
Address: , -
Station No.:________
Run No.:____________
Barometric Pressure:
______Date:
Operators:
Impinger 1
Final Volume_______________
Initial Volume______________
Volume collected____________
Impinger 2
Final Volume____ _____
Initial Volume _____
Volume collected
Impinger 3
Final Volume____
Initial Volume_
Volume collected
ml of
ml
ml
Impinqer
Final Volume
Initial Volume
Volume collected
Impinger
ml of
nil
ml
Final weight
Initial weight_
Weight collected
Total Volume Collected
ml
Filters
No.
Iinal Weight
Tare Weight
Weight
Collected
gm
cim
gm
gm
gin
gin
2 J
7 -
Ambient Temperature:
_Saniple Box Number:_
ml of cx / 1e) P
ml
nil
( c9
fco
ml of η 7.
ml
ml
- /:_t p, J -L
gm of
gm
qm
.1
Cleanup performed by
on
-------
P tCO OF YISU \L D T IIt ATIO OF O ACiT?
COAN?Ji C) -
I.OCAT rc ________________________________
TEST J CE / -
DATE // /7
TYPE FACILITY (iL 1 Lt. .
COITROL DEVICE )
UOU S OF OBSERVATIOU
O SEFWER ;/\iri u. .
O S J VER CE TIF ICAT IO ;ITE / ; /
O8SE VER AFFILIATIC L. ?
po ; r OF EMISSIO S 4(:- c (
UEIGIff OF DISCIV RGE FOI T C(
C1OC TI IE
OBSE VE LOCATTOU
Distance to D1 charg
Dlrectton from D sc iar e
}e t of Cbservattor Point
EACK ROUNO DESCRIPTION
S EAT} ER CO DITIO S
Wind Direction
141r.d Speed
k bient Temperature
S} Y CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
pLu::z DESCRI?T1O (
Color
Dist r.ce Visthie
OTii a I:;FOR;IATIOU
Initial
jr. l
44 .Q
L
i
,.
I,-) I
/I ,
(_fE k
( a
j 2
-____
4
4::7AJ.
:7A 4.,
t f
C
2
tDb
ete
J():.
.
L _
s t
Uumber
1
O3aC ItV_______
,
__
7
.i 1
7 T5 T T
I,
0
- --
-------
U3E AL ZC5TEZ VOL 39. O. 219 7uzsDAr, OVW. ! 1q74
G YATIC R CC .3
(Cont1ri 2d) -
o StRV ______________________
rrPE FACILiTY _____________
poi;ir or i ssT s __________
OBSER/ATiO RECORD PAGE OF
cj (), 1, . j g -
LC .ATIC __________________ TYPE FACILiTY c. /
TEST ________________ FOILT CF £M1$SIUliS __________
TE _______________
CDXPA Y
TEST t J SER
C. ITE
ST J.M ILUhE
I ecc (c - c! . If ?r1c bi )
Pr. !1 in. r t TTT Z 7tflt1
0 1 ,0 -
CC MZUTS
I 2J _
. J/1)I/
.)CI,L L -
. LLQ
L
.
______
1)
I i
2
- .--
Ii;-
r c
I
____
t-
.1 17
Y
.
l9
ic:
L J_I_
flr.
Ii .
STEA:4 PL J.E
Sccon s If a,nc b1e)
CO I E TS
0 15
i TT
3
tt chcd
30
31
3?
J3
I
3 ,
3 ,
_j_7_
31 1
II
I iJ
-11
.2
43
ti5
. C,
.7
1
)
5)
Si
5 ,
53
,4
57
5
IFfl Do 7&2Gi O 1L cd 1111- - (h4 , L3j
-------
C1OC TIHE
OBSERVER LOCATIOU
D1st nce to Dtzcharg
Direction from Dfsc arg
Het ht of Observation Point
ACI GROU O DESCRIPTION
TAThER CO 1OITIO S
flnd Dircction
t1ind Speed
kiblent Temperature
$)(Y CO DITIO S (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
?LU DESCRIPT1O L
Coor
D stancc Visible
oma lFoR:ATIO!L
It.. )
I.OCATIC re S , .iv
TEST J E rt z
DATE q/c,f-,
TYPE F C1L1TY -, j ,e c.,-
COI1 OL DEVICE P
P ECO QJ? VISUAL T R I; ATIO OF O ACIT?
-
PAGE cf____
I CURS OF OBSE VATIOU j i , I I
OBSERVER Th - c L. .
OBSERVER CEP.TIF1CATIO c;.TE U,77
O35E; VER AFFILIATICU_ sE P/ iVE(c. ,
POIHT OF EMIssIo: s R..C S -c i
IIEIGIff OF DISC! V RGE FOI T t 3 C
a
El
SU 1RY OF \P . GE O?ACITY
Initial
/.7, :,,I
Fir.al
.L2 /
0o/
(,4 ; I
j,c.... . ic(
le r_t
r
O(O
8 5
C LE? v
h
£c
Set
I
11 .-
-_ ==
r/o/.- I , ,
Oo cit
,;, .:
-
Readings ranged fro n ____ to l, ) % cpacRy
The source was/was not n ccr pl lance with
the time evdluatlon was made.
at
(A)
-------
CO A Y Po te .
LC ATIC1 F. . .
TEST W_.2 ft 2 .
LATE
O3SERVATIO RECOP PAGE OF
YP FI CILUY 0, t
P01(T CF £! 1SS1(fS - -
CO:4PA Y
LocArIO C
TEST r 9tit
D.ITE _______
O St VE _____________________
7Y T .C!LIT? _____________
PO!HT OF E ISi : __________
r t2AL CI TE VOL 39. NO. 219TUZS .AY, NOVE2.t T IZ 1974
9)
U,
GESt1WATIO P.ECC
(Con t1ri od)
PA E OF
I S1Et, 1 1LU E
I.
I S c chec f ?r ) l1c b1e
thi. [ C. 317E 4 J
101 I
CC: .z; TS
£7__Lj. cI°
LI /0
LLLcL _c
£1L
aL
-___
____
UQL1 £ 2___
__
iiiir
I___
:LL_ ___
____
.________
M .
STE/Ct PLU. E
CO iiS
S cord civc c If n1ccb eL
T i?i Att chco etac c1
30
F
31
3?
mr
j
3,-)
3 -
31
311
1 .
- ;.
41
.l
.lr ,
61
1
) ()
5)
cT
5?
j1
f; ,;
i
5 /
ii-
II Do;74-231 O F1 Cd 11U74 .U.c
-------
CO A Y
1.QCAT O. 3 L:e - Z ,-η, ( _ i
TEST u::cEs /i3 / ?/ - -
DATE 9 - /- .-
TYPE FACILITY L -
COUROL DEVICE
C1OC TIH
OBSERVER LOCATIOU
Distante to Di charg
Direction fror Discharge
Height ofrObservation Point
AC GROU D DESCRIPTIOt
1 tAT} ER CO OITIONS
i jnd Direction
1Ird Speed
kthlent Tetr.peratur
5 Y CC ;DITiO: s (clear,
overcast, couds, etc.)
PL1 :Z DESCRIPTIO L
Coor
D star cc VlsthlQ
cTII a 1:Wo ;;ATIOU
IIr;ATIO ( O O ACtTY P C
I OU S OF O St VATIO .
-I
OBSEP.VER -I/ P -
O3SE VER CEP.TIFICATIO:(
OasE VER AFFILIATICU L
POIrrr OF EM1SSIO S___________________
IIEIGItT OF DISCI \RG POINT
c?____
L %TE__________
--
4?
Initial
Fir.al
4 2 τ
? O
i 3
tJ
(f, k i
£(1
( /
5X -
3
:
/,.;
L 1f
-, /
,ic
7i2
C L,
/ )
c1 1 C
4?
i . 4&
/c (_)
i h
/o _
su 1: ARv OF A ERAG CPA ITY
- S :; n. =:=
/ ,,. I
C ac1t
.3
Readings ranged fron to )% cpacliy
The source was/t as not in cc pliance with
the tine evdluatlon was made.
at
-I
I
0
c
c
-------
TZ3t AL ZC! TEZ VOL. 39. NO. 2197LIZSDAY, NOVEM t 1Z 1974
C1 SE VATIO R CO P,\CZ _OF
(Contjn d)
o _____________________
1T? rf.C!tLi( _____________
POIHT O 1SZ11 S ___________
9,
D3S R?ATIO RECORD ,._PJtGE OF
C 2Aw fl, Z _ Co OBSERVER -
LCZATIC; _ .-t-: i- FACILI1Y u,, I -1-- , iZη
TEST , , .Jloi:g CF LM1SS1c s - ,Jc, < /
PATE η /j
COXM Y
LOCAl io r
TEST 1W SER
DATE ______
r
[ FJui:E
I S cr l(c! c! . If
I Ir. Bi. IT I 5 TTIaEL.T T
:c/ 0 /OI 5L, -
viI I
JL 2aQ
ir 1
f
?rt 1cab1c)
:i
L_________
CCMEUTS
.
9
.2 .L
-
L
r r 1 -
e-
is
. .)
I
7
a
30
STEIt;1 PL J E
Sccor check f l2 lUCL .i i_
CO YET
W
i!j
Att. ch
1
(t taC cj
3
?
Iz
.4
3 )
3ti
ψ __I_______
- ----__I______
--ic--
. (,
6)
t t )
51)
5 1
5?
Si
5;
55
5 .J
57
5
.L 1___
i Do i 2a O rle1 1 i1 .u.
-------
CO ?A ?
.OCAT I ,-
7Es1 tw::cz j
I .
DATE /
IYPEFA 6 !LITY
CO1IROL DEV1CE _ 3f ?
C1OC T1
OBS VE LOCATIOU
Distc cc to Di5charga
Direction from Dischar
Height of Observation Point
AC GWU: D DESCRIPTI0
EATPER CO DITIOUS
1nd Direction
lthd Speed
Arthlent TempErature
S Y CO DITIO S (clear.
overcast, clouds, etc.)
PLu; :E DESCR1PTI0 j
CoIor
Dlstar.ce Visibte
ovii a I:o AflOH
P tCOR ,QF SXSU/ L D T t ATIO OF O ACIT?
Initial
. 7 / 7 i
=.___
Final
.___
Doo,r
qcL
/ Fr
C
-
η-/O 7
c
flL
c, ,u
___
r
-
PAGZ c?____
I OU S O O3SE TIOU z _
O 3SERVER / .J c& .- x L e
O S f VEP. C 1TIFICATIO { c; TE__________
OBsE; VER AFFIUATICU t
POINT OF E!1ISSIO S 57 ?c,t
UEIGI T OF DISCI ,\P .G FOI ff /c 7
SW RY OF MER G OPACITY
-.---
Sct
:=t
Cp
city
.1 /7...(7
= i
/ ; .-7 /.
,.L
//.
-
Readings ranged fron / (> to; % cpaciiy
The source was/was not in ccr pl lance with
the tin e ev luat1on was n ade.
r 1
a
I
0
r
S.
a-
0
1
14
C
LA
a
-C
S.
0
1 I
0
1
9 -)
( )
C)
-------
___________ T.ocArIo r _
TEST 7iJ: S R...
-
7Wt At CI TU 1 VOL 3 1 NO. 2I9TUZS W, : ovv . r 12, 1974
TYPE FACILiTY _____________
F0 HT 0F E !SST /
CO .P,\ Y f . _ 4 ... _ --
LCCATIC _________________
TEST li .2 ?
P; z 9/; ;η /77
DBSZRYATIO RECORD PAGE OF
OBSERVER ____________________
TYPE FACILITY
POI: T CF LMISSWliS
CESERVATIO RECCR
(Cont1r . d) -
PAGE .7/OI_ ._.
N
! .
STEYJI ILUiE
Secci s (ch c If r . i1ic b1e)
CC IME 1TS
7 1 lT
3
0
2
-S
5
6
7
ii
: t :L
t J ___
- -
::
i _Z L&JS [ _____
-
.
!.!r .
ii i.
30
NI STEAS PLU..E
S co,, I -c c ck if ., i1fc b1e)
EI L k achcd ! n d
I d
CO .E T ,
: :i
N
--
- 3
N
-
3.)
\
/\
3t ,
, \
3L
3 I____
1 /
/
41 /
1
\
L__ IE
IV___
i
\
\
4 _
.% 5
\
67
\
6q
J_
._ L
\-
\
-
ci
3IZI
LF
55
zc
5 1
59I
In. Do 1 2 S1 O llcd 111S 4.U 4 &mj
N
-------
0
r
I
0
z
0
14
C
ni
a
-(
z
0
In
a
F
0
I
.
CC ?A ffi)I4t? ,R /1/( c9/I
t.OCATiO LO$ , 1 c 1 v -ej -s
TEST zw::cz , b / -, 3 _ .
DATE ZIL/ /77
TYPE FAC1L1TYR?f ,jtc?../aY
CO1TROL DEVICE________________________
P tCO1 D OP VISUA T PNIt ATIO OF O ACi1?
rt - _____
I OU S OF O3SERVATIO: _____________________
O3SERVER/ 1, 4 /L/e.itViL -l4 fr _
oaSERvEJ c RTIFIcAT1o;{ CIVtEJP . / 7j7
OaSE;WER AFFILIATICU f/ A
POIt T OF EMISSIO S 5i1 -4. ,
EIGUT OF DISCI 1 \RGE FO1 tT _ 2
Q
.5 If_i
I
SU IRY OF MERAGZ OPAC IT?
C1OC TIME
CaSERVER I0CAT!O
Distance to Di:c arg
Direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
ACKGROUNO DESCRIPTIO1
IEAThER CO: OITIO S
41nd Direction
1fnd Speed
b1cnt Ternpera ,tur
SKY CC DITIO S (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
PLi;:z DESCRIPT1O (
Color
Distance V sib1c
OT1I a I lFo : Tlou
initial
O9s5
Fir.ai
fDO7
7 D
E
2
1 qo
,1/
3-; 1;
X
5,l o
/
Seti
Itumbcr [
m -
C2 city_______
S i (v r. gc
Start-End
1
-.
.-
- (c ol
,
c,; .)
,),
,;
Readings ranged from ____ to ____ opacity
The source was/was not fri ceripi lance with ,_.at
the tin cvdluation was n ade.
9,
-------
CO A Y / LL g / , (ic o/-
LCCAT!C 4
TEST li ;2 k , c 0/
\TE
O3SZR?ATIO RECORD PAGE OF
CflSERV!R ? 44
7YPZ rACILI1Y Y
POIiT CF LM1SS1 S ηrA M -
CO! A Y
.ocArIor
1 1 51 11 j: 5 R
o st vc. ___________________
.rT r; cIr1Y ____________
roz r cF ussi ___________
?E3CLM. RIGI3TE VOL. 3?, NO. 2l9TUZs ivf, NOYZi4 t 974
I
CCSEIWAT1O R!COR
(Co tjrt 2d)
ri
1AJ .
STEI.M PLU:E
cc s (c c!.. If_?r Ic. b1c)
l . 1n. C 1 5 I (5 Ti f
-_____
H ° °
Ir iiz m
TZ1Zt
Dol J L. 2. 2...
I ii
tE d
CC: iE;rrs
-____
___
± ___________
___
.
E jE
ft
hr.
STEAI PL JE
S cor 1 ciec If n1Ic b1e)
COE S
i?i
i tt. c
e a c1
30
1
31
I ?
Fm)
.11
.v,
3. - ,
3
3 I
q
.0
41
42
;-j
( ,5
-______
ri
r ri
-______
1
5)
,1
5?
53
;4
55
5 (1
51
5
so
[ R Do 7 261 O I .1Cd 1111 4 .U. 3
-------
I . )
0
a-
0
C
ml
S
C I
I .
-(
z
0
I C
n
a
.0
4
CO AM? 1222 //e 1
1OCATIC I-os AIJc:eL
(EST t U C ) 7 J
g/ii/ 1 -
1 TYPE FACILITY J1 - ,c i
CONTROL DEVICE -
RECQI D OF SISU\L D TZPNIt ATIO { OF OPACITY
PAC c? -
I OURS OF O3SE VATIO ____________________
O3SERVER 7;L4-4 ,V V 44 4 1 L.-
O SE V R C RTIFICATIO: ;TE,4?R- .7 2..
OBSERVER AFFI!..IATICU_________________
POI? T OF EfUSsiQ: S 5
HEIGIff OF DISC!!ARGE FOI T .2 /
S fr
Al / !
- -
(I .-
£ J3 1 1
SU RY OF MERAC CP, C ITY
C1OC TIME
OBSEPIVER LOCAT!OU
Distance to D15charg
Dtrcct on from D schar
Height of Observation Point
AC GSOJ D DESCRIPTIOU
EATHE CO DIT IONS
iflnd Direction
Wind Speed
k bient Temperature
SKY CO OITIO S (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
PLL E DESCRI?TIO L
Coor
Distar.cc Visible
orii a IUFOR \TIOU f 1 ., ,r ii
Initial
/D0
Final
,/ .2
750
4:-
200
c2e,
C2 , fl
&
3 ;--
7
c4e4.
wI ,i9
I
10
T
St r -End
Opacit y______
S i IIv r cc
/ I I)
- I . .
,
C -
..
Readings ranged from ( ) to H 1 )_ cpaclIy
The source was/was not in ccr.pl lance with at
the tlir.a evd uat1on w s made.
C )
I )
-------
CO PA Y Pot C /?1Ak o,i.. .
LCAT!C 2 i 4 c 5
TEST li 2 jt , go i #
PATE 9j1i / 7
i.ocArIo r
TEST SEk
o st I/t; l _____________________
TY?E TACILITi _______________
POUIT OF 5S1CI: S __________
U t AL ZC TE., V0.. 32, NO. 219TUZSAY, NOVE$. C 12. 1974
OBS R1ATIO RECOP.D PAGE OF
O3SERVER 4 /1
TYPE FACILITY / 1 /A/c .L1
FOI LT CF EMI5S1C s srk -
G StRVATIO P.ECCP.3
(Cont1n_ d)
OF
i . .a
SIEf.M PLU:E
CC MEUTS
!eccirf (ch c f
C Li . ? ...iec!
?r Hcab1e)
i &!1 o 3 r 3-
2 /0110
T jp
-____
4
TL5 T iv
I
____
____
._______
P
-I-r-----
,
I
2
3
1
s
6
I
U
.,
ig
(I
.I
2?
3
-
I
P1
/ 1
2 i
ji::
Hr.
HIS.
STEI I PLus E
CO YEtTS
Scconds
iT i?i
ccc If pnlIc?b1eL
(ttt cI ca Uctac eo
30
IF
JH
4_______
1 1
t.u
4 1
1 : 2
i
--;ηη
1
I (3
4)
5)
.-vi-
j____
.
53,
53
T
-
1
1
57
w
rn Do:I4-2O1 O 1Ue 1111- .74,U:43
-------
0
r
U
0
0
C
IA
C,
-C
0
I
n
0
.4
I{OURS OF OBSERVATIOU Lj 4 Q
OBSERVER I W 4.s C:-. C-
OBSERVER CERTIFICATION c; 1 1E_ f3c/77_
OBSERVER AFFILIATICU (J.3b /1- &JEzIC _ .
POII T OF EM1ssi0: S pc:c. .5r c lz
HEIGI T OF DISC !ARG FOI T I C) /
z .
10 CAT IO c e - v
TEST lw::cE _____________________________
Dt TE ccf ii 17)
TYPE FAC1LITV. , I
CO1IROL DEVICE________________________
-I
a
? ? I
1t iUl. IJJ
RtCO D Q SISUi\L D T ? ATIO ( OF O ACIT?
) LL
1
I
5c -
SU ARY OF AVERAC OPACITY
C1OC ( TI
OBSERVER LOCATIOU
Distance to Discharge
flirection from Discharge
Height or Observation Point
ACKGROUNO DESCRIPTIOr
hTATP.ER CO OITIOUS
flnd Direction
l1ind Speed
kthlent Temperature
S} Y CO DTTIONS (clear,
overcast, clouds, etc.)
PLU DESCRIPTIO L
Color
Distance Visible
OTIIC t 1FOR AT1O!L
Initial
.d / / J
Final
F
4C O
U)
3 ic. vt
c te . r
50L 1
.S -It)
SO r
de 4 i
k.Ih,ILC.
-
()
Set
(iurnbor
r i
0 acity_______
Start-End
Str -
Ervt r cc
= _--
-
Readings ranged froa . .i to / . cpacIt.y
The source was/was ot In ccpl lance with
the time evaluation was n ade.
.at
9,
-
-------
COMPA;Y
, I
TLST
PATE
7 3t At ZG!3TE , VOL. 3?, HO. 2T9.TUE DAY, OVW.D 2, 1974
O?SERVATIO RECORD
PAGE _OF_
OBSERVER _______________________
TYPE FACIII1Y _______________
POIIT CF £ 11SS1O -
C StRVATIO R!CC D
(Co.it1n d) -
CO AW fc Q.r-i e -
1OC,\TI0 E3.. . rc I .
lEST !iJ 9EK __________________
D.\TE /i,71)
PACZ _..jOF .L.
O SE VE. flt .: iitci , G-.6L1r?1 ,
TT E TACILIT( L.( -- i
POLUT OF £ S5L6: rcc S
ii. 9th.
STEf.M i LWE
Sece t 1(c c. If ?r 1ic b1e)
CC: iE;1TS
L
T
S 1 : ti J
i:ct c d
0
-S
S
6
I I
.1 I
I
I
i x:
:
;r,
i
I . -)
2!
fl
lit-.
11th.
STEAM PL J E
Seconds Cc c ck If Itc b1e)
C0 ITS
TS
75
g
ttt. chco
LLac ccj
30
31
] ?
1. 3
j 1
3 ,
3u
3/
: s i
N
L
12
£5
i .c
t
L
L .
c
If
1L
,
i
&
25 _
- .
S
7
t 9
4 )
5 )
SI
.
5/
53
!
55
56
E
59
.
LFIt Do; 74231 O 1lcd 1 l174,lh i .z
-------
CO ?APD RJ/ c.9 I C-
1OCATIC L&5 , y/6 ?Le 5
r sr j::c . / D I
Dt TE f/u -7
TYPE FAc1L1TY/?eF, tJ /t )I
CONTROL DEVICE -
C1OC TIME _______
OBSERVER LOCATIOU
Distance to Dl charg _______
Direction from Discharge _______
Hci ht of Observation Point
BAC GSOUND DESCRIPTIOt
ZAThER co: oii bus
Wind Direction
Iind Speed _______
Ar bient Ternperatura
SKY CC DITIO S (clear.
overcast, % c ouds etc.)
PL1 Z DESCRIPTIOH
Co or
Dist ncc Visible
OTII:a 1NFOR: \T1OIZ ________
RECO OF ISUi L DET RJZt TIO OF O ACIT?
,L
PAGE cf____
HOURS OF OBSERVATIOU____________________
OBSERVER
O S RVER CERTIFICAl1O CIVrE__________
-a
O3SEWER AFFILIATICU_
POIffr OF E!USSIO S___________________
-a
liEIGI T OF DISCI \RGE FOI ff____________
a
,,
0
I
I,
0
r
I
z
0
1
L I
C
I.
U
p.
0
-I
n
suM: Rv OF A\ER. GE OPACITY
Initial
1h z5
Fthal
/b31
1L1e5 T
I
O
;I4? 4/?
A-
.,
5
-
yV
1
zc
Set
Uumber
Start--End
O acity_____
/
I(,
.-,,
Readings ranged fron / u to ____ % opacity
The source w 1 s/was not in ccrpliance with _.at
the time evdhatlon :as n ade.
0 1
-------
CO A Y f ! W R /Le
LC .ATIC i03 AA1c i
TZST : _________________
PATE
co:, 2A Y
LocArIo
TEST Ii M3tW
c st vr.. _________
UP T! CIL1TY
PGLHT 0F L I55i Z 1
1Z CU L CIZTE VOL 3 , NO. 219.TUS AY, OVM , 1974
O S R?ATIO RECO?.D PAGZ
OaSERV R/ M / VM A
TYPE FFCIU1YK F, / .,
?O! T CF LMISSIOIiS r
CtStRVAT1O. .ECC? D
(Cor tint d)
PA Z _OF
STEt.M PLU:iE
.(ch c . f ?1ic b1 )
I, .. lin. I i i r i r
_____
i/oI/OIi3 io
= 13:-iTo_ i --
251
5 i
Z$
j7 1
ii
10 I 1
1 1 I
m r
I I
r : i
4 - E
2
r-Du_
I
;5
:
71
j
L
CC: MZHis
._________________
Hr.
M i.
STEA:% PLU..
S cc f c c . If r 1cc b1eL
iT i- 1 tt ctica
CO ME TS
30
31
37
-.
-rn ------
8
1
.0
41
( .1
6_.)
.
.:I
. )
4
rj
S i)
SI
.
5/
53
; 4
55
s(J
5,
1r8 Do 74-231 O FL e1 11117 . .U; .S zn1
------- |