vvEPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency	
            Solid Waste and
            Emergency Response
            (5305W)
EPA530-R-98-012
NTIS: PB98-150 113
July 1998
RCRA  Permit
Compendium
Package
              M&r
              m
                                \;^i
                      Revision 8 — July 1998
               v£i®t • \

                                  '%&' !>•
                                J
                                ^iy
                    Printed on paper that contains at lest 20 percent postconsumer fiber

-------
 ***  IMPORTANT  ***
      INSTRUCTIONS
 CAREFULLY READ AND FOLLOW THE STEP-
  BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS LISTED BELOW:
    :  Replace all of the spines and covers in your existing
      bound compendium volumes
Step.2:  Update your copy of the compendium by appending
      the July 1998 update documents as indicated on the
      attached cover sheets
      Confirm that the first and the last document in each
      volume corresponds to the sections that are indicated
      on the associated cover and spine

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Revised
Covers and Spines
Replace the June 1997
RCRA Permit Policy Compendium
covers and spines with
the attached covers and spines

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Volume 1
Revised
Replace the entire
Junç 1997
Volume 1 (including user’s
guide and index) with the
attached revised Volume 1
(New disks containing the revised index are
also included to replace the old dBase file)

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 1998
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM 8th UPDATE PACKAGE
For your convenience, we have provided a list of the documents (organized by volume number
and reference number) which are contained in the July 1998 RCRA Permit Policy Compendium
Update- Rackage. There are no current update documents for Volumes 2,3 and 11.
Volume 4
9441.1997(01)
9441.1997(02)
9441.1997(03)
9441.1997(04)
9441.1997(05)
9441.1997(06)
9441.1997(07)
Volume 5
9442.1997(01)
9442.1997(02)
9442.1997(03)
9443.1997(01)
9443.1997(02)
Volume 6
9444.1997(01)
9444.1997(02)
Volume 7
9472.1997(01)
9476.1997(01)
9477.1997(01)
9477.1997(02)
9481.1997(01)
9481.1997(02)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 1998
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM 8th UPDATE PACKAGE
(Continued)
Volume 8
9483.1997(01)
9483.1997(02)
Volume 9
9488.1997(01)
9494.1997(01)
9496.1997(01)
9497.1997(01)
Volume 10
9502.1997(01)
Volume 12
9534.1997(01)
Volume 13
955 1.1997(01)
9551.1997(02)
9551.1997(03)
9551.1997(04)
9551.1997(05)
9554.1997(01)
9554.1997(02)
9554.1997(03)
9554.1997(04)
9554.1997(05)
9592.1997(01)
9592.1997(02)
9592.1997(03)
9593.1997(01)
9593.1997(02)
9593.1997(03)
9593.1997(04)
9593.1997(05)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
For your convenience, we have provided a list of the documents (organized by reference number)
which are contained in the RCRA Permit Policy Compendium.
9431.1984(01) 9432.1986(03) 9432.1990(03) 9433.1987(01)
9431.1987(01) 9432.1986(04) 9432.1991(01) 9433.1987(03)
9431.1987(02) 9432.1986(05) 9432.1993(01) 9433.1987(04)
9431.1987(03) 9432.1986(06) 9432.1993(02) 9433.1987(05)
9431.1988(01) 9432.1986(08) 9432.1994(01) 9433.1987(06)
9431.1988(02) 9432.1986(10) 9432.1994(02) 9433.1987(07)
9431.1989(01) 9432.1986(12) 9432.1994(03) 9433.1987(08)
9431.1989(02) 9432.1986(13) 9432.1995(01) 9433.1987(09)
9431.1989(03) 9432.1986(14) 9432.1995(02) 9433.1987(10)
9431.1990(01) 9432.1986(15) 9432.1996(01) 9433.1987(14)
9431.1991(01) 9432.1986(16) 9433.1984(03) 9433.1987(15)
9431.1991(02) 9432.1987(01) 9433.1984(05) 9433.1987(16)
9431.1991(03) 9432.1987(02) 9433.1984(06) 9433.1987(18)
9431.1993(01) 9432.1987(03) 9433.1985(02) 9433.1987(20)
9431.1994(01) 9432.1987(05) 9433.1985(03) 9433.1987(21)
9431.1994(02) 9432.1987(06) 9433.1985(04) 9433.1987(22)
9432.00-1 9432.1987(07) 9433.1985(05) 9433.1987(23)
9432.1980(01) 9432.1987(08) 9433.1985(06) 9433.1987(25)
9432.1981(01) 9432.1987(09) 9433.1986(01) 9433.1987(26)
9432.1982(01) 9432.1987(10) 9433.1986(04) 9433.1987(27)
9432.1983(01) 9432.1987(11) 9433.1986(05) 9433.1988(02)
9432.1983(02) 9432.1987(12) 9433.1986(06) 9433.1990(01)
9432.1984(01) 9432.1987(12a) 9433.1986(07) 9433.1990(02)
9432.1984(03) 9432.1987(13) 9433.1986(08) 9433.1990(03)
9432.1984(04) 9432.1988(01) 9433.1986(09) 9433.1990(04)
9432.1984(05) 9432.1988(02) 9433.1986(10) 9433.1990(05)
9432.1984(06) 9432.1988(03) 9433.1986(11) 9433.1990(06)
9432.1984(07) 9432.1988(04) 9433.1986(12) 9433.1990(07)
9432.1985(02) 9432.1988(05) 9433.1986(14) 9433.1991(01)
9432.1985(03) 9432.1988(06) 9433.1986(16) 9433.1991(02)
9432.1985(04) 9432.1989(01) 9433.1986(17) 9433.1991(03)
9432.1985(05) 9432.1989(02) 9433.1986(19) 9433.1994(01)
9432.1985(07) 9432.1989(03) 9433.1986(20) 9433.1994(02)
9432.1985(08) 9432.1989(04) 9433.1986(21) 9433.1994(03)
9432.1985(10) 9432.1989(05) 9433.1986(22) 9434.1989(01)
9432.1986(01) 9432.1990(01) 9433.1986(23) 9441.1980(02)
9432.1986(02) 9432.1990(02) 9433.1986(24) 9441.1980(03)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1980(04)
9441.1980(05)
944 1. 198 1(0 1)
9441.1981(05)
9441.1981(06)
9441. 1983(01)
9441.1983(03)
9441.1983(04)
9441.1983(07)
9441.1983(08)
9441. 1983(10)
944 1. 1984(0 1)
9441. 1984(03)
9441.1984(04)
9441.1984(05)
9441.1984(06)
9441.1984(07)
9441.1984(08)
9441.1984(09)
9441.1984(10)
9441.1984(11)
9441.1984(12)
9441.1984(13)
9441.1984(14)
9441. 1984(15)
944 1.1984(18)
9441. 1984(19)
9441.1984(20)
9441.1984(21)
9441.1984(22)
9441.1984(23)
9441.1984(24)
9441. 1984(25)
9441. 1984(26)
9441.1984(27)
9441.1984(28)
9441.1984(29)
9441.1984(30)
944 1. 1984(3 1)
9441. 1984(32)
9441.1984(33)
9441.1984(34)
9441.1984(35)
9441.1984(36)
9441.1984(37)
9441.1984(38)
944 1. 1985(01)
9441.1985(02)
9441.1985(03)
9441.1985(05)
9441.1985(06)
9441. 1985(07)
9441.1985(08)
9441.1985(09)
9441. 1985(10)
9441.1985(11)
9441.1985(12)
9441 .1985(12a)
9441. 1985(13)
9441.1985(15)
9441.1985(18)
9441. 1985(19)
9441.1985(19a)
9441.1985(20)
9441.1985(21)
9441.1985(23)
9441.1985(24)
944 1. 1985(25)
9441. 1985(26)
9441.1985(27)
944 1. 1985(28)
9441 .1985(28a)
9441 .1985(28b)
9441.1985(29)
9441. 1985(30a)
944 1. 1985(3 1)
9441.1985(32)
9441.1985(33)
9441.1985(34)
9441.1985(35)
9441.1985(38)
9441.1985(39)
944 1.1985(4 1)
9441.1985(42)
9441.1985(43)
9441.1985(44)
944 1. 1986(01)
9441.1986(02)
9441.1986(03)
9441. 1986(04)
9441.1986(05)
9441.1986(06)
9441.1986(07)
9441.1986(08)
9441. 1986(09)
9441.1986(10)
9441.1986(11)
9441. 1986(14)
9441.1986(16)
944 1.1986(17)
9441. 1986(19)
9441. 1986(21)
9441. 1986(22)
9441. 1986(23)
9441. 1986(24)
9441. 1986(25)
9441. 1986(26)
9441.1986(27)
9441. 1986(28)
9441. 1986(29)
9441.1986(30)
9441. 1986(3 1)
9441.1986(32)
9441.1986(33)
9441. 1986(34)
9441. 1986(37)
9441.1986(38)
9441.1986(39)
9441.1986(40)
9441. 1986(4 1)
944 1. 1986(42)
9441.1986(43)
9441. 1986(44)
9441.1986(45)
9441 .1986(45a)
9441.1986(46)
9441.1986(47)
9441.1986(48)
9441.1986(49)
9441. 1986(5 1)
9441. 1986(52)
9441.1986(53)
9441.1986(54)
9441.1986(55)
9441.1986(56)
9441.1986(57)
9441.1986(58)
9441.1986(59)
9441.1986(61)
9441.1986(62)
9441.1986(64)
9441. 1986(65)
9441. 1986(67)
9441.1986(69)
9441.1986(72)
9441.1986(73)
9441.1986(74)
9441.1986(76)
9441.1986(78)
9441.1986(79)
9441.1986(80)
944 1. 1986(81)
9441.1986(82)
9441.1986(83)
9441.1986(84)
9441.1986(85)
9441.1986(86)
9441.1986(87)
944 1. 1986(88)
9441. 1986(89)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1986(92) 9441.1987(52) 9441.1988(28) 9441.1989(40)
9441.1986(94) 9441.1987(53) 9441.1988(30) 9441.1989(42)
9441.1986(95) 9441.1987(54) 9441.1988(31) 9441.1989(43)
9441.1986(96) 9441.1987(57) 9441.1988(32) 9441.1989(47)
9441.1986(97) 9441.1987(58) 9441.1988(33) 9441.1989(48)
9441.1986(98) 9441.1987(59) 9441.1988(36) 9441.1989(49)
9441.1987(02) 9441.1987(61) 9441.1988(39) 9441.1989(50)
9441.1987(03) 9441.1987(64) 9441.1988(40) 9441.1989(51)
9441.1987(04) 9441.1987(65) 9441.1988(41) 9441.1989(52)
9441.1987(06) 9441.1987(66) 9441.1988(42) 9441.1989(53)
9441.1987(08) 9441.1987(68) 9441.1988(44) 9441.1989(54)
9441.1987(09) 9441.1987(71) 9441.1988(45) 9441.1989(55)
9441.1987(10) 9441.1987(73) 9441.1988(47) 9441.1989(56)
9441.1987(102) 9441.1987(74) 9441.1988(48) 9441.1990(01)
9441.1987(11) 9441.1987(75) 9441.1988(48a) 9441.1990(02)
9441.1987(12) 9441.1987(76) 9441.1988(49) 9441.1990(03)
9441.1987(13) 9441.1987(77) 9441.1988(50) 9441.1990(04)
9441.1987(14) 9441 .1987(77a) 9441.1989(01) 9441.1990(05)
9441.1987(15) 9441.1987(78) 9441.1989(02) 9441.1990(06)
9441.1987(16) 9441.1987(83) 9441.1989(03) 9441.1990(07)
9441.1987(17) 9441.1987(84) 9441.1989(04) 9441.1990(08)
9441.1987(18) 9441.1987(96) 9441.1989(05) 9441.1990(09)
9441.1987(19) 9441.1987(98) 9441.1989(10) 9441.1990(09a)
9441.1987(20) 9441.1987(99) 9441.1989(11) 9441.1 990(09b)
9441.1987(21) 9441.1988(03) 9441.1989(12) 9441.1990(10)
9441.1987(24) 9441.1988(04) 9441.1989(14) 9441.1990(11)
9441.1987(26) 9441.1988(05) 9441.1989(15) 9441.1990(12)
9441.1987(28) 9441.1988(06) 9441.1989(17) 9441.1990(13)
9441.1987(29) 9441.1988(07) 9441.1989(19) 9441.1990(13a)
9441.1987(30) 9441.1988(08) 9441.1989(20) 9441 .1990(13b)
9441.1987(31) 9441.1988(09) 9441.1989(22) 9441 .1990(13c)
9441.1987(32) 9441.1988(11) 9441.1989(23) 944 1.1990(13d)
9441.1987(36) 9441.1988(13) 9441.1989(24) 9441 .1990(13e)
9441.1987(37) 9441.1988(14) 9441.1989(27) 9441.1990(14)
9441.1987(39) 9441.1988(17) 9441.1989(29) 9441.1990(15)
9441.1987(40) 9441.1988(19) 9441.1989(30) 9441.1990(16)
9441.1987(41) 9441.1988(20) 9441.1989(31) 9441.1990(17)
9441.1987(42) 9441.1988(23) 9441.1989(32) 9441.1990(18)
9441.1987(45) 9441.1988(25) 9441.1989(34) 9441.1990(19)
9441.1987(46) 9441.1988(27) 9441.1989(39) 9441.1990(20)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1990(21)
9441.1990(22)
9441.1990(23)
9441.1990(25)
9441.1990(26)
9441.1990(27)
9441.1990(28)
9441.1990(29)
9441.1990(30)
9441. 1990(31)
9441.1990(32)
9441. 1990(33)
9441.1990(34)
9441. 1990(35)
9441.1991(01)
9441.1991(02)
9441. 1991(03)
9441.1991(04)
9441. 1991(05)
9441.1991(05a)
9441.1991(06)
9441.1991(08)
9441.1991(09)
9441. 1991(10)
9441.1991(11)
9441. 1991(12)
9441.1991(13)
9441.1991(14)
9441. 1991(14a)
9441. 1991(15)
9441.1991(16)
9441.1991(17)
9441.1991(18)
9441.1991(19)
9441.1992(01)
9441.1992(02)
9441.1992(03)
9441.1992(04)
9441.1992(05)
9441.1992(06)
9441.1992(07)
9441. 1992(08)
9441.1992(09)
9441.1992(10)
9441.1992(11)
9441.1992(12)
9441. 1992(13)
9441. 1992(14)
9441. 1992(15)
9441. 1992(16)
9441. 1992(17)
9441. 1992(18)
9441. 1992(19)
9441. 1992(20)
9441.1992(21)
9441. 1992(22)
9441.1992(23)
9441. 1992(24)
9441.1992(25)
9441.1992(26)
9441.1992(27)
9441. 1992(28)
9441.1992(29)
9441.1992(30)
9441.1992(31)
9441.1992(32)
9441.1992(33)
9441.1992(34)
9441.1992(35)
9441.1992(36)
9441.1992(37)
9441.1992(38)
9441.1992(39)
9441.1992(40)
9441.1992(41)
9441.1992(42)
9441. 1992(43)
9441.1992(44)
9441. 1993(01)
9441.1993(02)
9441. 1993(03)
9441.1993(04)
9441.1993(05)
9441.1993(06)
9441.1993(07)
9441.1993(08)
9441.1993(09)
9441. 1993(10)
9441.1993(11)
9441.1993(12)
9441. 1993(13)
9441.1993(14)
9441. 1993(15)
9441.1993(16)
9441.1993(17)
9441.1993(18)
9441.1993(19)
9441.1993(20)
9441.1993(2 1)
9441.1993(22)
9441.1993(23)
9441.1993(24)
9441.1994(01)
9441.1994(02)
9441.1994(03)
9441.1994(04)
9441.1994(05)
9441.1994(06)
9441.1994(07)
9441.1994(08)
9441.1994(09)
9441. 1994(10)
9441.1994(11)
9441.1994(12)
9441.1994(13)
9441.1994(14)
9441.1994(15)
9441.1994(16)
9441.1994(17)
9441.1994(18)
9441.1994(19)
9441.1994(20)
9441.1994(21)
9441.1994(22)
9441.1994(23)
9441.1994(24)
9441.1994(25)
9441.1994(26)
9441.1994(27)
9441.1994(28)
9441.1994(29)
9441.1994(30)
9441.1994(31)
9441.1994(32)
9441.1995(01)
9441.1995(02)
9441.1995(03)
9441.1995(04)
9441.1995(05)
9441.1995(06)
9441. 1995(07)
9441. 1995(08)
9441.1995(09)
9441.1995(10)
9441.1995(11)
9441. 1995(12)
9441.1995(13)
9441. 1995(14)
9441.1995(15)
9441. 1995(16)
9441.1995(17)
9441. 1995(18)
9441.1995(19)
9441. 1995(20)
9441.1995(21)
9441.1995(22)
9441.1995(23)
944 1. 1995(24)
9441.1995(25)
9441.1995(26)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1995(27) 9442.1987(06) 9442.1993(05) 9443.1986(02)
9441.1995(28) 9442.1988(01) 9442.1994(01) 9443.1986(04)
9441.1995(29) 9442.1988(02) 9442.1994(02) 9443.1986(05)
9441.1995(30) 9442.1988(03) 9442.1994(03) 9443.1986(06)
9441.1995(31) 9442.1988(05) 9442.1994(04) 9443.1986(09)
9441.1995(32) 9442.1988(06) 9442.1994(05) 9443.1986(10)
9441.1995(33) 9442.1989(01) 9442.1994(06) 9443.1986(11)
9441.1995(34) 9442.1989(02) 9442.1995(01) 9443.1986(12)
9441.1996(01) 9442.1989(03) 9442.1995(02) 9443.1986(13)
9441.1996(02) 9442.1989(04) 9442.1995(03) 9443.1986(15)
9441.1996(03) 9442.1989(05) 9442.1995(04) 9443.1986(16)
9441.1996(04) 9442.1989(07) 9442.1996(01) 9443.1986(17)
9441.1996(05) 9442.1989(09) 9442.1996(02) 9443.1986(18)
9441.1996(06) 9442.1990(01) 9442.1996(03) 9443.1986(19)
9441.1996(07) 9442.1990(02) 9442.1997(01) 9443.1987(01)
9441.1996(08) 9442.1990(03) 9442.1997(02) 9443.1987(02)
9441.1996(09) 9442.1990(04) 9442.1997(03) 9443.1987(04)
9441.1996(10) 9442.1990(05) 9443.1980(02) 9443.1987(05)
9441.1996(11) 9442.1991(01) 9443.1981(01) 9443.1987(06)
9441.1996(12) 9442.1991(02) 9443.1983(01) 9443.1987(07)
9441.1996(13) 9442.1991(03) 9443.1983(02) 9443.1987(08)
9441.1997(01) 9442.1991(04) 9443.1983(03) 9443.1987(09)
9441.1997(02) 9442.1991(05) 9443.1983(04) 9443.1987(11)
9441.1997(03) 9442.1991(06) 9443.1983(05) 9443.1987(12)
9441.1997(04) 9442.1991(07) 9443.1984(03) 9443.1987(14)
9441.1997(05) 9442.1991(08) 9443.1984(04) 9443.1987(16)
9441.1997(06) 9442.1991(09) 9443.1984(05) 9443.1987(17)
9441.1997(07) 9442.1991(10) 9443.1984(06) 9443.1987(18)
9442.1984(01) 9442.1991(11) 9443.1984(08) 9443.1987(19)
9442.1985(01) 9442.1991(12) 9443.1984(09) 9443.1987(20)
9442.1986(01) 9442.1991(13) 9443.1984(10) 9443.1987(23)
9442.1986(02) 9442.1991(14) 9443.1985(01) 9443.1987(24)
9442.1986(03) 9442.1991(15) 9443.1985(02) 9443.1987(25)
9442.1986(04) 9442.1991(16) 9443.1985(04) 9443.1987(26)
9442.1 986(04a) 9442.1991(17) 9443.1985(05) 9443.1987(28)
9442.1986(07) 9442.1991(18) 9443.1985(07) 9443.1987(29)
9442.1986(08) 9442.1993(01) 9443.1985(08) 9443.1987(30)
9442.1987(02) 9442.1993(02) 9443.1985(09) 9443.1987(31)
9442.1987(03) 9442.1993(03) 9443.1985(10) 9443.1987(32)
9442.1987(04) 9442.1993(04) 9443.1985(11) 9443.1987(33)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9443.1988(01) 9443.1994(06) 9444.1985(09) 9444.1987(08)
9443.1988(02) 9443.1995(01) 9444.1985(11) 9444.1987(09)
9443.1988(03) 9443.1995(02) 9444.1985(12) 9444.1987(10)
9443.1988(04) 9443.1995(03) 9444.1985(13) 9444.1987(11)
9443.1988(05) 9443.1997(01) 9444.1985(14) 9444.1987(13)
9443.1988(06) 9443.1997(02) 9444.1985(15) 9444.1987(14)
9443.1988(07) 9444.1980(01) 9444.1985(1 5a) 9444.1987(15)
9443.1988(08) 9444.1980(02) 9444.1985(16) 9444.1987(16)
9443.1988(09) 9444.1980(03) 9444.1985(17) 9444.1987(17)
9443.1988(10) 9444.1980(05) 9444.1986(02) 9444.1987(18)
9443.1988(11) 9444.1980(06) 9444.1986(03) 9444.1987(1 9)
9443.1989(01) 9444.1981(01) 9444.1986(05) 9444.1987(20)
9443.1989(02) 9444.1981(02) 9444.1986(07) 9444.1987(22)
9443.1989(03) 9444.1981(03) 9444.1986(08) 9444.1987(23)
9443.1989(04) 9444.1981(05) 9444.1986(09) 9444.1987(26)
9443.1989(07) 9444.1982(01) 9444.1986(11) 9444.1987(27)
9443.1989(08) 9444.1983(01) 9444.1986(13) 9444.1987(28)
9443.1 989(08a) 9444.1983(02) 9444.1986(14) 9444.1987(29)
9443.1989(09) 9444.1983(03) 9444.1986(15) 9444.1987(30)
9443.1989(10) 9444.1984(01) 9444.1986(16) 9444.1987(31)
9443.1990(01) 9444.1984(02) 9444.1986(17) 9444.1987(31 a)
9443.1991(01) 9444.1984(03) 9444.1986(19) 9444.1987(33)
9443.1991(02) 9444.1984(04) 9444.1986(20) 9444.1987(34)
9443.1992(01) 9444.1984(05) 9444.1986(21) 9444.1987(36)
9443.1992(03) 9444.1984(06) 9444.1986(23) 9444.1987(37)
9443.1992(04) 9444.1984(07) 9444.1986(25) 9444.1 987(37a)
9443.1992(05) 9444.1984(08) 9444.1986(26) 9444.1987(38)
9443.1992(06) 9444.1984(09) 9444.1986(27) 9444.1987(39)
9443.1993(01) 9444.1984(10) 9444.1986(28) 9444.1987(40)
9443.1993(02) 9444.1984(11) 9444.1986(29) 9444.1987(41)
9443.1993(03) 9444.1984(12) 9444.1986(30) 9444.1987(42)
9443.1993(04) 9444.1984(14) 9444.1986(31) 9444.1987(43)
9443.1993(05) 9444.1984(16) 9444.1986(32) 9444.1987(44)
9443.1993(06) 9444.1984(17) 9444.1986(33) 9444.1987(47)
9443.1993(07) 9444.1985(01) 9444.1987(02) 9444.1987(48)
9443.1994(01) 9444.1985(02) 9444.1987(03) 9444.1987(49)
9443.1994(02) 9444.1985(03) 9444.1987(04) 9444.1987(51)
9443.1994(03) 9444.1985(05) 9444.1987(05) 9444.1987(52)
9443.1994(04) 9444.1985(07) 9444.1987(06) 9444.1987(53)
9443.1994(05) 9444.1985(08) 9444.1987(07) 9444.1987(55)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9444.1988(01) 9444.1991(06) 9445.1985(06) 9451.1989(02)
9444.1988(02) 9444.1992(01) 9445.1987(01) 9451.1991(01)
9444.1 988(02a) 9444.1992(02) 9445.1987(02) 9451.1991(02)
9444.1988(03) 9444.1992(03) 9445.1987(03) 9451.1991(03)
9444.1988(05) 9444.1992(04) 9445.1987(03a) 9451.1992(01)
9444.1988(06) 9444.1992(05) 9445.1987(04) 9451.1993(01)
9444.1988(07) 9444.1992(06) 9445.1987(05) 9451.1993(02)
9444.1988(09) 9444.1992(07) 9445.1987(06) 9451.1993(03)
9444.1988(10) 9444.1992(08) 9445.1989(01) 9451.1994(01)
9444.1988(11) 9444.1992(09) 9445.1989(02) 9451.1994(02)
9444.1988(12) 9444.1993(01) 9445.1992(01) 9451.1995(01)
9444.1988(13) 9444.1993(02) 9445.1992(02) 9451.1996(01)
9444.1988(14) 9444.1993(03) 9445.1993(01) 9451.1996(02)
9444.1988(15) 9444.1993(04) 9445.1993(02) 9451.1996(03)
9444.1989(02) 9444.1993(05) 9445.1993(03) 9451.1996(04)
9444.1 989(02a) 9444.1994(01) 9445.1993(04) 9451.1996(05)
9444.1 989(02b) 9444.1994(02) 9445.1993(05) 9451.1996(06)
9444.1 989(02c) 9444.1994(03) 9445.1993(06) 9451.1996(07)
9444.1989(03) 9444.1994(04) 9445.1993(07) 9451.1996(08)
9444.1989(04) 9444.1994(05) 9445.1993(08) 9452.1984(02)
9444.1989(05) 9444.1994(06) 9445.1993(09) 9452.1984(03)
9444.1989(06) 9444.1994(07) 9445.1994(01) 9452.1985(01)
9444.1989(07) 9444.1994(08) 9445.1994(02) 9452.1985(02)
9444.1989(08) 9444.1994(09) 9445.1994(03) 9452.1986(01)
9444.1989(09) 9444.1994(10) 9445.1995(01) 9452.1986(02)
9444.1989(10) 9444.1995(01) 9451.1980(01) 9452.1986(03)
9444.1989(11) 9444.1995(02) 9451.1980(02) 9452.1987(01)
9444.1989(12) 9444.1996(01) 9451.1983(02) 9452.1987(02)
9444.1989(13) 9444.1997(01) 9451.1984(02) 9452.1989(02)
9444.1989(14) 9444.1997(02) 9451.1985(03) 9452.1990(01)
9444.1990(01) 9445.1984(01) 9451.1986(01) 9452.1991(01)
9444.1990(02) 9445.1984(02) 9451.1986(02) 9452.1993(01)
9444.1990(03) 9445.1984(03) 9451.1986(03) 9452.1993(02)
9444.1990(04) 9445.1984(05) 9451.1986(06) 9452.1993(03)
9444.1990(05) 9445.1984(06) 9451.1986(07) 9452.1996(01)
9444.1991(01) 9445.1985(01) 9451.1987(01) 9452.1996(02)
9444.1991(02) 9445.1985(02) 9451.1987(02) 9452.1996(03)
9444.1991(03) 9445.1985(03) 9451.1987(03) 9453.1982(01)
9444.1991(04) 9445.1985(04) 9451.1987(04) 9453.1984(01)
9444.1991(05) 9445.1985(05) 9451.1989(01) 9453.1984(02)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9453.1984(03) 9454.1986(02) 9461.1996(01) 9474.1984(01)
9453.1985(02) 9454.1986(05) 9462.1985(01) 9475.1984(01)
9453.1985(04) 9454.1987(01) 9462.1987(02) 9475.1985(01)
9453.1985(05) 9454.1994(01) 9462.1993(01) 9475.1985(02)
9453.1985(06) 9454.1994(02) 9462.1994(01) 9475.1986(O la)
9453.1986(01) 9455.1982(01) 9462.1995(01) 9475.1987(01)
9453.1986(02) 9455.1985(01) 9462.1995(02) 9475.1989(01)
9453.1986(03) 9455.1986(01) 9462.1996(01) 9475.1995(01)
9453.1986(04) 9455.1987(01) 9462.1996(02) 9475.1995(02)
9453.1986(05) 9455.1987(02) 9463.1980(01) 9476.00-12
9453.1986(06) 9455.1989(01) 9463.1980(02) 9476.00-13
9453.1986(07) 9455.1991(01) 9470.1985(01) 9476.00-14
9453.1986(08) 9455.1991(02) 9471.1983(01) 9476.00-16
9453.1987(01) 9455.1991(03) 9471.1984(01) 9476.00-18
9453.1987(02) 9455.1994(01) 9471.1984(02) 9476.1983(02)
9453.1987(03) 9455.1995(01) 9471.1984(03) 9476.1984(03)
9453.1987(04) 9455.1995(02) 9471.1984(04) 9476.1984(04)
9453.1987(05) 9456.1986(01) 9471.1984(05) 9476.1984(05)
9453.1987(07) 9456.1987(01) 9471.1986(01) 9476.1985(01)
9453.1987(08) 9456.1992(01) 9471.1987(02) 9476.1985(02)
9453.1987(09) 9456.1994(01) 9471.1988(02) 9476.1985(03)
9453.1988(02) 9456.1996(01) 9471.1988(03) 9476.1985(04)
9453.1988(03) 9456.1996(02) 9471.1988(04) 9476.1985(05)
9453.1989(01) 9457.1987(01) 9471.1988(05) 9476.1986(01)
9453.1989(03) 9461.1983(01) 9471.1988(06) 9476.1986(Ola)
9453.1989(04) 9461.1985(01) 9471.1989(01) 9476.1986(02)
9453.1989(05) 9461.1986(01) 9471.1993(01) 9476.1986(03)
9453.1989(07) 9461.1987(03) 9472.1983(01) 9476.1986(04)
9453.1989(08) 9461.1987(04) 9472.1983(02) 9476.1987(01)
9453.1990(01) 9461.1987(05) 9472.1985(01) 9476.1987(03)
9453.1990(02) 9461.1988(01) 9472.1985(02) 9476.1987(05)
9453.1990(03) 9461.1989(01) 9472.1986(02) 9476.1987(07)
9453.1991(01) 9461.1989(02) 9472.1986(04) 9476.1987(08)
9453.1991(02) 9461.1989(03) 9472.1986(06) 9476.1988(01)
9453.1992(01) 9461.1989(04) 9472.1987(01) 9476.1 988(02a)
9453.1993(01) 9461.1990(01) 9472.1988(01) 9476.1988(03)
9453.1993(02) 9461.1990(02) 9472.1991(01) 9476.1988(03a)
9453.1994(01) 9461.1991(01) 9472.1994(01) 9476.1988(04)
9454.1984(01) 9461.1994(01) 9472.1995(01) 9476.1989(01)
9454.1986(01) 9461.1994(02) 9472.1997(01) 9476.1989(02)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9476.1989(03) 9477.1987(09) 9481.1986(01) 9483.1986(06)
9476.1990(01) 9477.1987(10) 9481.1986(02) 9483.1986(07)
9476.1991(01) 9477.1987(11) 9481.1986(04) 9483.1986(08)
9476.1991(02) 9477.1987(12) 9481.1986(06) 9483.1986(09)
9476.1992(01) 9477.1988(01) 9481.1986(08) 9483.1986(10)
9476.1992(02) 9477.1988(03) 9481.1986(10) 9483.1986(11)
9476.1993(01) 9477.1988(04) 9481.1987(01) 9483.1986(12)
9476.1993(02) 9477.1988(05) 9481.1987(02) 9483.1986(13)
9476.1997(01) 9477.1988(06) 9481.1987(03) 9483.1987(02)
9477.00-5 9477.1989(01) 9481.1987(04) 9483.1987(03)
9477.00-6 9477.1990(01) 9481.1987(05) 9483.1987(04)
9477.1982(01) 9477.1990(02) 9481.1987(06) 9483.1987(05)
9477.1982(03) 9477.1993(01) 9481.1987(07) 9483.1987(06)
9477.1983(01) 9477.1994(01) 9481.1988(01) 9483.1987(07)
9477.1983(02) 9477.1994(02) 9481.1988(02) 9483.1987(08)
9477.1983(03) 9477.1994(03) 9481.1988(03) 9483.1987(09)
9477.1983(04) 9477.1994(04) 9481.1991(01) 9483.1987(10)
9477.1984(01) 9477.1994(05) 9481.1992(01) 9483.1987(11)
9477.1984(02) 9477.1994(06) 9481.1992(02) 9483.1987(12)
9477.1984(04) 9477.1996(01) 9481.1996(01) 9483.1987(13)
9477.1984(05) 9477.1996(02) 9481.1997(01) 9483.1987(14)
9477.1984(06) 9477.1996(03) 9481.1997(02) 9483.1987(15)
9477.1984(07) 9477.1997(01) 9482.1985(01) 9483.1987(16)
9477.1984(08) 9477.1997(02) 9482.1986(01) 9483.1987(17)
9477.1984(09) 9480.00-14 9482.1993(01) 9483.1987(18)
9477.1985(02) 9480.1984(01) 9482.1994(01) 9483.1987(19)
9477.1986(01) 9480.1985(01) 9482.1995(01) 9483.1987(20)
9477.1986(02) 9480.1985(02) 9483.1983(01) 9483.1988(01)
9477.1986(03) 9480.1987(01) 9483.1983(02) 9483.1988(02)
9477.1986(04) 9480.1987(02) 9483.1983(03) 9483.1988(03)
9477.1986(05) 9480.1996(01) 9483.1983(04) 9483.1988(04)
9477.1986(09) 9480.1996(02) 9483.1983(05) 9483.1988(06)
9477.1986(10) 9480.1996(03) 9483.1984(01) 9483.1988(07)
9477.1986(11) 9481.1985(01) 9483.1984(02) 9483.1988(08)
9477.1986(12) 9481.1985(Ola) 9483.1984(03) 9483.1988(09)
9477.1986(13) 9481. 1985(Olb) 9483.1986(01) 9483.1988(10)
9477.1986(16) 9481.1985(03) 9483.1986(02) 9483.1988(11)
9477.1987(01) 9481.1985(04) 9483.1986(03) 9483.1988(12)
9477.1987(03) 9481.1985(05) 9483.1986(04) 9483.1988(13)
9477.1987(05) 9481.1985(06) 9483.1986(05) 9483.1988(14)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9483.1988(15) 9484.1987(12) 9487.1986(11) 9489.1985(01)
9483.1988(18) 9484.1988(03) 9487.1986(12) 9489.1987(02)
9483.1989(01) 9484.1991(01) 9487.1986(13) 9489.1988(01)
9483.1989(02) 9484.1992(01) 9487.1986(14) 9489.1988(02)
9483.1989(03) 9484.1994(01) 9487.1987(01) 9489.1990(01)
9483.1989(04) 9484.1996(01) 9487.1988(01) 9489.1991(01)
9483.1989(05) 9485.1984(01) 9487.1993(01) 9489.1991(02)
9483.1989(06) 9485.1985(01) 9487.1995(01) 9489.1991(03)
9483.1989(07) 9486.1981(01) 9487.1996(01) 9489.1991(04)
9483.1990(01) 9486.1985(01) 9488.00-IA 9489.1991(05)
9483.1990(02) 9486.1986(03) 9488.00-2 9489.1992(01)
9483.1990(03) 9486.1987(01) 9488.00-3 9489.1992(02)
9483.1991(01) 9486.1988(01) 9488.1985(03) 9489.1994(01)
9483.1993(01) 9486.1988(02) 9488.1985(04) 9489.1994(02)
9483.1997(01) 9486.1989(01) 9488.1985(07) 9489.1995(01)
9483.1997(02) 9486.1990(01) 9488.1986(03) 9489.1995(02)
9484.00-5a 9487.00-1 A 9488.1986(04) 9489.1996(01)
9484.1984(01) 9487.00-2A 9488.1986(05) 9489.1996(02)
9484.1984(02) 9487.00-8 9488.1986(10) 9493.00-IA
9484.1985(01) 9487.00-9 9488.1987(01) 9493.1985(01)
9484.1985(Olb) 9487.1981(01) 9488.1987(03) 9493.1985(02)
9484.1985(02) 9487.1984(01) 9488.1987(04) 9493.1985(03)
9484.1986(01) 9487.1984(02) 9488.1987(09) 9493.1985(04)
9484.1986(02) 9487.1984(03) 9488.1988(01) 9493.1985(05)
9484.1986(03) 9487.1984(04) 9488.1988(02) 9493.1985(06)
9484.1986(04) 9487.1984(05) 9488.1989(01) 9493.1986(01)
9484.1986(05) 9487.1985(02) 9488.1989(02) 9493.1986(02)
9484.1986(07) 9487.1985(03) 9488.1989(03) 9493.1986(03)
9484.1986(08) 9487.1985(04) 9488.1990(01) 9493.1986(05)
9484.1986(09) 9487.1985(04a) 9488.1990(02) 9493.1987(01)
9484.1987(01) 9487.1985(05) 9488.1991(01) 9493.1991(01)
9484.1987(02) 9487.1985(06) 9488.1991(02) 9493.1991(02)
9484.1987(03) 9487.1985(08) 9488.1991(03) 9493.1991(03)
9484.1987(04) 9487.1985(10) 9488.1991(04) 9493.1991(04)
9484.1987(05) 9487.1986(03) 9488.1991(05) 9493.1991(05)
9484.1987(06) 9487.1986(04) 9488.1992(01) 9493.1993(01)
9484.1987(07) 9487.1986(07) 9488.1992(02) 9494.1985(01)
9484.1987(08) 9487.1986(08) 9488.1993(01) 9494.1985(02)
9484.1987(09) 9487.1986(09) 9488.1997(01) 9494.1985(03)
9484.1987(11) 9487.1986(10) 9489.00-2 9494.1986(01)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9494.1986(02) 9495.1991(01) 9498.1994(12) 9502.1986(07a)
9494.1986(03) 9495.1994(01) 9498.1994(13) 9502.1986(09)
9494.1986(04) 9496.1990(01) 9498.1995(01) 9502.1986(10)
9494.1986(05) 9496.1991(01) 9498.1995(02) 9502.1986(11)
9494. 1986(05a) 9496.1993(0 1) 9498.1996(01) 9502.1986(13)
9494.1986(06) 9496.1994(01) 9498.1996(02) 9502.1986(14)
9494.1987(02) 9496.1997(01) 9498.1996(03) 9502.1986(15)
9494.1987(03) 9497.1986(01) 9498.1996(04) 9502.1986(16)
9494.1991(01) 9497.1986(01a) 9498.1996(05) 9502.1986(17)
9494.1991(02) 9497.1986(02) 9498.1996(06) 9502.1986(18)
9494.1991(03) 9497.1987(01) 9498.1996(07) 9502.1986(19)
9494.1991(04) 9497.1987(02) 9501.1982(01) 9502.1986(20)
9494.1992(01) 9497.1987(03) 9501.1982(02) 9502.1987(01)
9494.1993(01) 9497.1989(01) 9501.1984(01) 9502.1987(02)
9494.1994(01) 9497.1989(02) 9501.1985(01) 9502.1987(03)
9494.1994(02) 9497.1989(03) 9501.1986(01) 9502.1987(04)
9494.1994(03) 9497.1991(01) 9501.1987(01) 9502.1987(05)
9494.1997(01) 9497.1991(02) 9501.1987(02) 9502.1987(06)
9495.1985(03) 9497.1993(01) 9501.1987(03) 9502.1987(07)
9495.1986(02) 9497.1994(01) 9501.1990(01) 9502.1987(09)
9495.1986(03) 9497.1995(01) 9502.00-2 9502.1987(11)
9495.1986(04) 9497.1996(01) 9502.00-3 9502.1988(01)
9495.1986(05) 9497.1997(01) 9502.00-4 9502.1988(02)
9495.1986(08) 9498.1992(01) 9502.00-6 9502.1989(01)
9495.1986(09) 9498.1992(02) 9502.00-7 9502.1989(02)
9495.1986(13) 9498.1993(01) 9502.1984(01) 9502.1989(03)
9495.1986(20) 9498.1993(02) 9502.1985(01) 9502.1989(04)
9495.1986(21) 9498.1993(03) 9502.1985(02) 9502.1990(01)
9495.1986(22) 9498.1993(04) 9502.1985(04) 9502.1990(02)
9495.1986(28) 9498.1994(01) 9502.1985(05) 9502.1991(01)
9495.1986(30) 9498.1994(02) 9502.1985(06) 9502.1992(01)
9495.1987(01) 9498.1994(03) 9502.1985(09) 9502.1992(02)
9495.1987(04) 9498.1994(04) 9502.1986(01) 9502.1993(01)
9495.1987(05) 9498.1994(05) 9502.1986( O la) 9502.1994(01)
9495.1987(06) 9498.1994(06) 9502.1986(02) 9502.1995(01)
9495.1988(02) 9498.1994(07) 9502.1986(03) 9502.1 995(02)
9495.1989(01) 9498.1994(08) 9502.1986(04) 9502.1995(03)
9495.1989(02) 9498.1994(09) 9502.1986(05) 9502.1996(01)
9495.1990(01) 9498.1994(10) 9502.1986(06) 9502.1996(02)
9495.1990(02) 9498.1994(11) 9502.1986(07) 9502.1996(03)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9502.1996(04) 9522.1979(01) 9523.1984(08) 9525.1990(02)
9502.1996(05) 9522.1983(02) 9523.1984(10) 9525.1996(01)
9502.1997(01) 9522.1984(01) 9523.1984(11) 9527.1985(01)
9503.1985(01) 9522.1984(02) 9523.1985(01) 9527.1986(01)
9503.1985(02) 9522.1984(03) 9523.1985(02) 9527.1986(02)
9503.1991(01) 9522.1984(04) 9523.1985(05) 9527.1987(02)
9503.1993(01) 9522.1985(01) 9523.1986(01) 9527.1988(03)
9503.50-1 A 9522.1985(02) 9523.1986(02) 9527.1992(01)
9503.51-IA 9522.1985(04) 9523.1986(03) 9527.1993(01)
9503.52-1 A 9522.1985(05) 9523.1986(05) 9528.00-1
9504.1984(01) 9522.1985(06) 9523.1987(02) 9528.1982(01)
9504.1984(02) 9522.1986(01) 9523.1987(03) 9528.1982(02)
9504.1985(01) 9522.1986(02a) 9523.1988(01) 9528.1983(01)
9504.1986(02) 9522.1986(03) 9523.1991(01) 9528.1983(03)
9504.1987(01) 9522.1987(02) 9523.1993(01) 9528.1984(01)
9504.1987(02) 9522.1 988(01) 9523.1994(01) 9528.1985(01)
9504.1991(01) 9522.1988(02) 9523.50-1 A 9528.1985(02)
9505.1986(01) 9522.1988(03) 9524.1983(01) 9528.1985(03)
9505.1987(01) 9522.1988(04) 9524.1984(01) 9528.1985(04)
9505.1994(01) 9522.1988(05) 9524.1984(02) 9528.1985(05)
9505.1995(01) 9522.1990(01) 9524.1985(01) 9528.1985(09)
9520.1986(01) 9522.1992(01) 9524.1986(01) 9528.1985(11)
9521.1984(01) 9522.1993(01) 9524.1988(01) 9528.1986(01)
9521.1984(02) 9522.1993(02) 9524.1989(01) 9528.1986(04)
9521.1984(03) 9523.00-11 9524.1989(02) 9528.1986(06)
9521.1985(01) 9523.00-12 9524.1989(03) 9528.1986(07)
9521.1986(02) 9523.00-14 9524.1994(01) 9528.1986(09)
9521.1986(03) 9523.00-15 9525.1982(01) 9528.1986(10)
9521.1986(04) 9523.00-17 9525.1984(01) 9528.1986(11)
9521.1986(04a) 9523.00-18 9525.1985(01) 9528.1987(01)
9521 .1986(05a) 9523.1982(01) 9525.1986(01) 9528.1987(02)
9521.1986(06a) 9523.1983(02) 9525.1986(02) 9528.1987(03)
9521.1987(01) 9523.1983(03) 9525.1986(04) 9528.1987(04)
9521.1988(03) 9523.1983(06) 9525.1986(05) 9528.1987(09)
9521.1990(01) 9523.1984(01) 9525.1986(06) 9528.1987(10)
9521.1991(01) 9523.1984(02) 9525.1986(07) 9528.1987(12)
9521.1991(02) 9523.1984(03) 9525.1988(01) 9528.1987(14)
9521.1994(01) 9523.1984(04) 9525.1988(02) 9528.1987(16)
9522.00-1 9523.1984(06) 9525.1989(01) 9528.1988(02)
9522.00-3 9523.1984(07) 9525.1990(01) 9528.1988(03)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9528.1988(05) 9542.1980(03) 9551.1988(02) 9551.1991(07)
9528.1988(06) 9542.1980(04) 9551.1988(03) 9551.1991(08)
9528.1989(11) 9542.1980(05) 9551.1988(04) 9551.1991(09)
9528.1989(13) 9542.1981(01) 9551.1988(05) 9551.1991(10)
9528.1990(01) 9542.1981(02) 9551.1988(07) 9551.1991(11)
9528.1990(02) 9542.1982(01) 9551.1988(08) 9551.1991(12)
9528.1990(03) 9542.1982(02) 9551.1988(09) 9551.1991(13)
9528.1991(01) 9542.1982(03) 9551.1988(10) 9551.1991(14)
9528.1991(02) 9542.1983(01) 9551.1988(12) 9551.1991(15)
9528.1991(03) 9542.1985(01) 9551.1988(13) 9551.1992(01)
9528.1992(01) 9543.00-1 9551.1988(14) 9551.1992(02)
9528.1992(02) 9543.1984(01) 9551.1988(15) 9551.1993(01)
9531.1993(01) 9551.01-01 9551.1989(01) 9551.1993(02)
9534.1991(01) 9551.1986(03) 9551.1989(02) 9551.1993(03)
9534.1997(01) 9551.1986(07) 9551.1989(03) 9551.1993(04)
9541.00-6 9551.1986(08) 9551.1989(04) 9551.1994(01)
9541.1982(01) 9551.1986(11) 9551.1989(05) 9551.1994(02)
9541.1984(04) 9551.1986(15) 9551.1989(06) 9551.1995(01)
9541.1984(05) 9551.1986(19) 9551.1990(01) 9551.1996(01)
9541.1984(08) 9551.1986(22) 9551.1990(02) 9551.1996(02)
9541.1984(09) 9551.1986(23) 9551.1990(03) 9551.1996(03)
9541.1985(01) 9551.1986(24) 9551.1990(04) 9551.1996(04)
9541.1985(05) 9551.1987(01) 9551.1990(05) 9551.1997(01)
9541.1985(07) 9551.1987(04) 9551.1990(06) 9551.1997(02)
9541.1985(09) 9551.1987(05) 9551.1990(07) 9551.1997(03)
9541.1986(04) 9551.1987(06) 9551.1990(08) 9551.1997(04)
9541.1986(05) 9551.1987(07) 9551.1990(09) 9551.1997(05)
9541.1986(10) 9551.1987(09) 9551.1990(10) 9553.1986(02)
9541.1986(13) 9551.1987(10) 9551.1990(11) 9553.1986(03)
9541.1986(14) 9551.1987(12) 9551.1990(12) 9553.1986(04)
9541.1986(19) 9551.1987(13) 9551.1990(13) 9553.1987(01)
9541.1986(20) 9551.1987(14) 9551.1990(14) 9553.1987(02)
9541.1986(24) 9551.1987(16) 9551.1990(15) 9553.1987(03)
9541.1987(01) 9551.1987(19) 9551.1990(16) 9553.1987(07)
9541.1987(04) 9551.1987(20) 9551.1991(01) 9553.1987(09)
9541.1987(10) 9551.1987(21) 9551.1991(02) 9553.1987(11)
9541.1988(01) 9551.1987(22) 9551.1991(03) 9553.1987(12)
9541.1991(01) 9551.1987(23) 9551.1991(04) 9553.1987(13)
9542.1980(01) 9551.1987(24) 9551.1991(05) 9553.1987(13a)
9542.1980(02) 9551.1988(01) 9551.1991(06) 9553.1987(14)

-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9553.1987(15) 9554.1991(04) 9573.1986(01) 9592.1996(03)
9553.1987(16) 9554.1992(01) 9573.1987(01) 9592.1996(04)
9553.1988(01) 9554.1992(02) 9573.1990(01) 9592.1996(05)
9553.1988(02) 9554.1993(01) 9573.1990(02) 9592.1996(06)
9553.1989(01) 9554.1993(02) 9573.1991(01) 9592.1996(07)
9553.1989(02) 9554.1994(01) 9573.1994(01) 9592.1996(08)
9553.1990(01) 9554.1994(02) 9574.00-01 9592.1996(09)
9553.1993(01) 9554.1994(03) 9574.00-02 9592.1997(01)
9553.1994(01) 9554.1994(04) 9574.1985(01) 9592.1997(02)
9554.1986(01) 9554.1994(05) 9574.1990(01) 9592.1997(03)
9554.1986(03) 9554.1994(06) 9574.1991(01) 9593.1995(01)
9554.1986(04) 9554.1995(01) 9581.1988(01) 9593.1996(01)
9554.1986(05) 9554.1995(02) 9592.1988(01) 9593.1996(02)
9554.1987(02) 9554.1997(01) 9592.1992(01) 9593.1997(01)
9554.1987(03) 9554.1997(02) 9592.1992(02) 9593.1997(02)
9554.1988(03) 9554.1997(03) 9592.1993(01) 9593.1997(03)
9554.1988(04) 9554.1997(04) 9592.1993(02) 9593.1997(04)
9554.1988(05) 9554.1997(05) 9592.1993(03) 9593.1997(05)
9554.1989(02) 9555.00-01 9592.1993(04)
9554.1989(03) 9555.1987(01) 9592.1993(05)
9554.1989(04) 9560.1985(01) 9592.1993(06)
9554.1989(05) 9561.1994(01) 9592.1993(07)
9554.1990(01) 9561.1994(02) 9592.1993(08)
9554.1990(02) 9561.1995(01) 9592.1993(09)
9554.1990(03) 9571.1985(01) 9592.1994(01)
9554.1990(04) 9571.1986(04) 9592.1994(02)
9554.1990(05) 9571.1987(01) 9592.1994(03)
9554.1990(06) 9571.1989(01) 9592.1994(04)
9554.1990(07) 9571.1989(02) 9592.1994(05)
9554.1990(08) 9571.1990(01) 9592.1994(06)
9554.1990(09) 9571.1990(02) 9592.1994(07)
9554.1990(10) 9571.1990(03) 9592.1994(08)
9554.1990(11) 9571.1990(04) 9592.1994(09)
9554.1990(12) 9571.1990(05) 9592.1994(10)
9554.1990(13) 9571.1993(01) 9592.1994(11)
9554.1990(14) 9571.1993(02) 9592.1994(12)
9554.1990(15) 9572.00-02 9592.1995(01)
9554.1991(01) 9572.1986(01) 9592.1995(02)
9554.1991(02) 9572.1988(03) 9592.1996(01)
9554.1991(03) 9573 .00-01 9592.1996(02)

-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY
C OMPENDIUM
User’s Guide

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM USER’S GUIDE
OVERVIEW
The RCR.A Permit Policy Compendium is a reference for Regional and State permit writers
which consists of Headquarters’ permitting policies and procedures. The Compendium
volumes include this Users’ Guide, a key word index, and reference memoranda, letters,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Directives, and other documents
organized chronologically within subject categories.
The Compendium was originally compiled in late 1985. This updated Compendium includes
documents issued through December 31, 1996.
For these compilations, the files of EPA Headquarters Office of Solid Waste Divisions and
Branches were reviewed to identify memoranda, letters, directives, and other documents that
set forth policies and interpretations relevant to the RCRA permit program. The documents
identified as relevant were then organized, according to a system based on the structure of the
OSWER Directives System. Each document is assigned an unique number which both
categorizes the document by general topic area and identifies the year in which the document
was written. The numbering system uses the same basic categories as the OSWER Directives
System.
KEYWORD INDEX
A key word index is included in Volume I to assist the user in identifying and locating
relevant documents. The index, organized in alphabetical order, lists the topic and the
documents which are relevant to the topic, identified by title, document number and date. The
key word index groups related topics and cross references topics which may be relevant.
Subkey words have been identified as a means to specify groups of titles which may fall within
a broader key word category.
Summaries of documents which had been included in the original Compendium have been
deleted. Users of the original Compendium did not fmd them useful.
After a key word listing, there may be a “See “or “See also .“ In the “See
case, the documents relating to the key word have been grouped into another listing. For
example, the listing for “Absorbents” refers the user to “Liquid Waste.” Similarly, the listing
for “Appeal” refers the reader to “Permit Process,” but also reminds the user to “See also
‘Closure”, since appeals of closure plans also may be relevant.
—1—

-------
As an alternative method to search for a specific memo, diskettes with the key word index on
dBase III Plus have been included in this package. Additional information on loading,
indexing, and searching in this database can be found in Appendix I.
DOCUMENTS INCLUDED
The Compendium incorporates a wide variety of documents that may be useful to staff
working in the field of RCRA permitting. The Compendium includes relevant RCRA
permitting memoranda, letters, OSWER Directives, Regulatory Interpretive Letters (RILs),
Program Interpretation Guidelines (PIGs), RCRA Reauthorization Statutory Interpretations
(RSIs), RCRA/Superfund Hothne Monthly Status Reports and Summaries of Permit Assistance
Team (PAT) Comments. Although the Compendium includes RILs, PIGs, RSIs, and PATs
from the previous years, the Office of Solid Waste no longer issues these documents.
Documents that are internal Headquarters correspondence or express preliminary thoughts or
comments were not included in the Compendium. Only those documents providing a clear
interpretation of Agency policy or procedures have been compiled.
ORGANIZATION
The RCR.A Permit Policy Compendium volumes include this Users’ Guide, a key word index,
and memoranda, letters, and other documents organized chronologically within subject
categories. The source documents include all documents issued through December 31, 1996.
OSWER Directives are the first documents in any section. They are ordered chronologically
as well.
There are 13 volumes in this reference document:
Volume
Number Document Reference Numbers Broad Subject Cate g ies
I User’s Guide, Key Word Index
2 - 9420.1980-9441.1984 Hazardous Waste Management System,
Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste
3 - 9441.1985-9441.1989 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste (cont’d)
4 - 9441.1990-9441.1996 identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste (cont’d)
5 - 9442.1980-9444.1986 Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste (cont’d)
6 - 9444.1987-9457.1996 identification and Listing of Hazardous
-2-

-------
Waste (cont’d), Generator Standards
7 - 9460.1980-9482.1996 Transporters Standards, TSDF
Administrative Requirements, TSDF
Technical Requirements
8 - 9483.1980-9486.1986 TSDF Technical Requirements (cont’d)
9 - 9486.1987-9498.1996 TSDF Technical Requirements (cont’d),
Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes
10 - 9500.1980-9522.1996 Permitting Policies, Permitting Procedures
11 - 9523.1980-9528.1996 Permitting Procedures (cont’d)
12 - 9530.1980-9551.1991 Air Emissions, State Authorization, Land
Disposal Restrictions
13 - 9551.1992-9593.1996 Land Disposal Restrictions (cont’d), Waste
Minimization, Subtitle D, RCRA Grant
Funds, Miscellaneous
NUMBERING SYSTEM
All source documents are identified by a reference number in the upper right hand corner of
the page. The document reference number is also in the key word index. This reference
numbering system is designed to be consistent with the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) Directives System which generally follows the organizational structure of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Each document reference number consists of four digits preceding a decimal point and
additional alpha/numeric characters following the decimal point. The basic form used for
numbering the Compendium documents is illustrated below:
9999.1986(09)
9999 = Subject category number
1986 = Year document was issued
(09) = Chronological number within the year of issue and the subject category.
This document would be the ninth document of 1986 in the subject category 9999.
Subject Category Prefix
The first four digits of the document reference number indicate the subject category
into which the document has been classified, based on the structure of the RCRA
regulations including Subtitles C, D and J. Each subject category refers to a subsection
-3-

-------
of the RCRA regulations or relevant statutory issue (such as Waste Minimization).
Thus, a document is assigned a four digit category number based on the sub-section of
the regulations or the issue which is addressed in the document. Appendix II of this
Users’ Guide lists the subject category numbers and identifies, if appropriate, the 40
CFR Part or Subpart associated with each number. As demonstrated in Appendix II,
there are a number of sections within the OSWER Directives that are “Reserved.”
These sections correspond to regulations which do not exist at this time.
All documents assigned to the same category are located together in the reference
volumes under the appropriate category number. Within each subject category,
documents are ordered chronologically.
Document Specific Suffix
The alpha/numeric characters found after the decimal point in the document reference
number indicate the year and, within that year, the chronological order in which the
document was issued.
ADDENDUM DOCUMENTS
Included in each update is a series of addendums to the Compendium. These documents are
the reference materials which have been produced since the last update. They should be
inserted in the back of the appropriate section of the Compendium.
DELETED REFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND SUMMARIES
Since the original compilation of the Compendium, a number of documents have been deleted
because they are now out-of-date or they were replaced by a more recent document. As a
result, there are some gaps in the chronological numbering sequence of the documents and
summaries.
INSERTED REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Since the original compilation of the Compendium, a number of documents have been
identified as missing from the Compendium. As these documents are identified, they will be
included in the subsequent Compendium Update. They should be inserted into their appropriate
location within the Compendium.
-4-

-------
LOCATING INFORMATION
The Compendium is a reference tool that can be used in two ways, depending on the needs of
the user. Information may be found referring to individual subject category sections or by
using the key word index.
In reviewing individual subject categories, the user will find all of the documents concerning a
specific subject. Alternatively, by referring to the key word index, the user may locate the
exact document of interest without reviewing all of the documents in the category. As noted
earlier, the key word index also serves to remind the user of other topics which may be
relevant to the particular issue in question. Appendix III contains the list of available key
word and subkey words located in the key word index.
Asterisks
The document titles preceded by an asterisk in the key word index are the
RCRA/Superfund Hotline Monthly summaries. They are marked with an asterisk to
clearly differentiate them from the letters and memoranda.
-5-

-------
DISCLAIMER
The compilation of documents in this Compendium, as well as the policies, procedures and
interpretations outlined in the documents themselves, is intended solely for the guidance of
employees of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This compilation may not include
all documents discussing Agency views on particular subjects. In addition, these documents
are not intended and cannot be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural,
enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. The views expressed in these
documents do not necessarily reflect the current position of the Agency, and EPA reserves the
right to act at variance with these views or to change them at any time without public notice.
-6-

-------
APPENDIX I
Loading, Indexing and Seardiing
in dBase III Plus

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Loading and Using the Key Word Index on dBase III Plus
The key word index has been divided into two database files due to size. These files should be
merged and saved on the computer hard drive to allow the entire document to be indexed and
searched. The following instructions will allow the user to load, retrieve, and merge the files
together and save the files as one file on the computer hard drive.
Loading
Insert the disk labelled COMP2.DBF into the disk drive.
At the prompt, type:
copy [ source drive] COMP2.DBF to [ target drive target directory]
Enter dBase 111+. Typically, this is done by typing either “dBase” or “db” at the prompt.
The dBase 111+ system will display a copyright screen and then prompt the user to continue by
pressing the (ENTER] key. The default drive and directory must now be set to retrieve the
COMP2.DBF file.
Retrieving
1. Press the [ ESCI key at the dBase 111+ menu to access the dBase dot prompt.
2. Set the default drive and directory: at the dot prompt, type
set directory to [ default drive] (default directory]
3. Retrieve the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
use comp2.dbf
The COMP2.DBF file has now been retrieved and is currently open. The COMP1.DBF file
must now be merged with the COMP2.DBF file.
—1-

-------
Merging
1. Merge the COMP1.DBF file with the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
append from (source drive] compl.dbf
The APPEND comm2nd adds the records in the COMP1.DBF file to the COMP2.DBF file.
Thus, COMP2.DBF becomes the file name for the entire key word index located on the
default bard drive\directoiy. The key word index file (COMP2.DBF) can now be indexed or
searched in its entirety.
Indexing
dBase 111+ is a man2gement system which allows the user to organize and manipulate data.
When the COMP2.DBF file is retrieved without indexing, the data records are in the same
order in which the data were originally entered or appended. To readily manipulate the data,
the file must be indexed. The following instructions will index the file as it appears in the key
word index of Volume 1.
1. Index the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
index on substr(KEYWORD,1,25)+
substr(SUBKEY WORD, 1,25) +
substr(TITLE,l,30) to KEY.NDX
The COMP2.DBF tile will index to 100% and an index file (KEY.NDX) will be
created.
2. Press the [ P2) key to return to the dBase 111+ menu.
The COMP2.DBF file is now indexed and the user can browse through the file in the manner
in which it is presented in Volume 1.
-2-

-------
Searching
dBase HI + allows the user to search for particular data elements within a file.. Therefore, if
the user knows the date of a memo, the COMP2.DBF file can be searched for all of the
memos written on that specific date. Searches can be conducted for each of the data fields
within COMP2.DBF (e.g., KEYWORD, SUBKEYWORD, IDNUMBER, TITLE and
DOCDATE). The following instnictions indicate how to search for specific documents.
1. Highlight RETRIEVE option from the dBase 111+ menu
2. Select DISPLAY
3. Select BUILD A SEARCH CONDITION
4. Select a COMP2.DBF file Field Name: options include KEYWORD,
SUBKEYWORD, IDNUMBER, TITLE, and DOCDATE (e.g., select DOCDATE)
5. Select a logical operator: options include = EQUAL TO, <= LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO, GREATER THAN, > =GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO, and <>NOT EQUAL TO (e.g., select =EQUAL TO)
6. At the prompt, enter a search value (e.g., enter 10/02/91)
7. Select a logical operator for the FOR clause: options include NO MORE
coNDmoNs, COMBINE WITH .AND., and COMBINE WITH .OR. (e.g., select
NO MORE CONDITIONS)
8. Select EXECUTE COMMAND
The system will now display the record numbers and the associated data for each document
dated 10/02/91.
For more information on data manipulation, indexing, and searching, consult a dBase 111+
Reference Book.
-3-

-------
This Page IntentLonally Left Blank

-------
APPENDJX II
Subject Category Numbering System

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
9400.00 GENERAL OSW POLICY AND PROCEDURES
9410.00 RESERVED
9420.00 RESERVED
9430.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (Part 260)
9431.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9432.00 DEFINITIONS (Subpart B)
9433.00 RULEMAKING PEt inONS (Subpart C)
9434.00 OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
9435.00- RESERVED
9439.00
9440.00 1DEN ImiCATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(Part 261)
9441.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9442.00 CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTES
(Subpart B)
9443.00 CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(Subpart C)
9444.00 LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart D)
9445.00 APPENDICES
9446.00- RESERVED
9449.00
9450.00 GENERATOR STANDARDS (Part 262)
9451.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9452.00 MANIFEST (Subpart B)
9453.00 PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS (Subpart C)
9454.00 RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING (Subpart D)
9455.00 EXPORTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart E)
9456.00 IMPORTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart F)
9457.00- RESERVED
9459.00
—1—

-------
9460.00 TRANSPORTER STANDARDS (Part 263)
9461.00 GENERAL STANDARDS (Subpart A)
9462.00 COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANIFEST,
RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING (Subpart B)
9463.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCHARGES (Subpart C)
9464.00- RESERVED
9469.00
9470.00 TSDF ADMINISTRATWE REQUIREMENTS (Parts 264 and 265)
9471.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9472.00 GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS (Subpart B)
9473.00 PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION (Subpart C)
9474.00 CONTINGENCY PLAN AND EMERGENCY
PROCEDURES (Subpart D)
9475.00 MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING AND
REPORTING (Subpart E)
9476.00 CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE (Subpart G)
9477.00 FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
(Subpart H)
9478.00- RESERVED
9479.00
9480.00 TSDF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (Parts 264 and 265)
9481.00 GROUND WATER PROTECTION STANDARDS
(Subpart F)
9482.00 CONTAINERS (Subpart I)
9483.00 TANKS (Subpart 3)
9484.00 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (Subpart K)
9485 .00 WASTE PILES (Subpart L)
9486.00 LAND TREATMENT (Subpart M)
9487.00 LANDFILLS (Subpart N)
9488.00 INCINERATORS (Subpart 0)
9489.00 MISCELLANEOUS UNITS (Part 264, Subpart X, Part 265,
Subparts P. Q and R)
-2-

-------
9490.00 STANDARDS FOR MANAGING SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
AND SPECIFIC TYPES OF FACILITIES (Part 266)
9491.00 SUBPART A (RESERVED)
9492.00 SUBPART B (RESERVED)
9493.00 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS USED IN A MANNER
CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL (Subpart C)
9494.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
(Subpart D)
9495.00 USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY (Subpart E)
9496.00 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS USED FOR PRECIOUS METAL
RECOVERY (Subpart F)
9497.00 SPENT LEAD-ACID BATFERIES BEING RECLAIMED
(Subpart G)
9498.00 BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (Subpart H)
9499.00 RESERVED
9500.00 PERMIUING POLICIES
9501.00 PERMITFING PRIORITIES
9502.00 CORRECTIVE ACTION
9503.00 SPECIAL PERMIUJNG UNIVERSE
9504.00 COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
9505.00 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PERMITI1NG ACTIVITIES
9506.00- RESERVED
9509.00
9510.00 RESERVED
9520.00 PERMIrrING PROCEDURES (Parts 124 and 270)
9521.00 GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Part 124, Subpart A)
9522.00 GENERAL INFORMATION (Part 270, Subpart A)
9523.00 PERMIT APPLICATION (Part 270, Subpart B)
9524.00 PERMIT CONDITIONS (Part 270, Subpart C)
9525.00 CHANGES TO PERMITS (Part 270, Subpart D)
9526.00 EXPIRATION AND CONTINUATION OF PERMITS (Part 270,
Subpart B)
9527.00 SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS (Part 270, Subpart F)
9528.00 INTERIM STATUS (Part 270, Subpart G)
9529.00 RESERVED
-3-

-------
9530.00 AIR EMISSION STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TSDFs
9531.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9532.00 RESERVED
9533.00 RESERVED
9534.00 EQUIPMENT LEAKS AND PROCESS VENTS (Subpart C)
9535.00- RESERVED
9539.00
9540.00 STATE AUTHORIZATION (Part 271)
9541.00 FINAL AUTHORIZATION (Subpart A)
9542.00 INTERIM AUTHORIZATION ( Subpart B )
9543.00 ASSESSMENT OF STATE CAPABILiTIES
9544.00- RESERVED
9549.00
9550.00 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS (Part 268)
9551.00 GENERAL (Subpan A)
9552.00 RESERVED
9553.00 PROHIBITION ON LAND DISPOSAL WASTE SPECIFIC
PROHIBITIONS GROUP (Subpart C)
9554.00 TREATMENT STANDARDS (Subpart D)
9555.00 PROHIBITIONS ON STORAGE (Subpart E)
9556.00- RESERVED
9559.00
9560.00 WASTE MINIMIZATION
9561.00 POLICY STATEMENTS
9562.00- RESERVED
9569.00
9570.00 SUBTITLE D
9571.00 MINING WASTES
9572.00 STATE PROGRAMS
9573.00 MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION
9574.00 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
-4-

-------
9575.00- RESERVED
9579.00
9580.00 ADMINiSTRATIVE DIRECTIVES
9581.00 RCRA GRANT FUNDS
9582.00 CORRESPONDENCE
9583.00- RESERVED
9589.00
9590.00 MISCELLANEOUS
9591.00 MEDICAL WASTE (Subtitle J)
9592.00 USED OIL (Part 279)
9593.00 UNIVERSAL WASTES (Part 273)
9594.00- RESERVED
9599.00
-5-

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
APPENDIX III
List of Key Words and Subkey Words

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
KEY WORD LIST
ABSORBENTS (see Liquid Waste)
ACCUMULATION (see Generators; see also Tank System)
ACL (see Alternate Concentration Limit, Groundwater Monitoring)
ACTIVE INGREDIENT (see Listed Hazardous Waste under Sole Active Ingredient)
ACTIVE/INACTIVE FACILITY (see Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities)
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (see Enforcement, Corrective Action)
AEROSOL CANS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
AGRICULTURAL WASTE (see also Exclusions)
• FIFRA
• Pesticides
AIR EMISSIONS
• Subpart CC
AIRBAG INFLATORS (see Listed Hazardous Waste under Commercial Chemical Products)
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) (see Groundwater Monitoring; see also
Appendix VIII)
ANALYTIC METHODS (see also Appendix Vifi, Appendix IX, SW-846)
• Detection Limits
• Laboratory Analysis
• Sample Analysis
• Sampling
• Sampling Plan
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (see Tank System)
API SEPARATOR SLUDGE (see also Petroleum Refmery Wastes, Sludge, Wastewater)
APPEALS (see Permit Process; see also Closure Process)
APPENDIX IX (see also Appendix Vifi, Groundwater Monitoring)
• Skinner List
APPENDIX VIII (see also ACL, Analytic Methods, Appendix IX, Groundwater Monitoring,
Hazardous Constituents, Sampling)
AQUEOUS WASTE (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
AQUIFER (see Groundwater Monitoring)
ASBESTOS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
ASSESSMENT MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA) (see Mixed Waste)
AUTHORIZED STATES (see State Authorization)
BAGHOUSE DUST (see Incineration, Sludge, Scrubber)
BALLAST FLUID (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
• SUBKEY WORD
Kcyword.Ist

-------
BATTERIES (see Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
BDAT (see Best Demonstrated Available Technology, Land Disposal Restrictions)
BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BDAT) (see Land Disposal
Restrictions)
BEVILL EXCLUSION (AMENDMENT) (see Mining Waste under Bevill Amendment)
BIENNIAL REPORTS (see Generators)
BIF RULE (see Incineration)
BIFs (see Boiler and Industrial Furnaces)
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT (see Treatment)
BLASTING CAPS (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
BLENDING AND BURNING (see Burning and Blending)
BOILER (see Incineration)
BOILER SLAG (see Mining Waste)
BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFs)
• Continuous Emissions Monitors
• Performance Standards
• Sham Recycling
BOND RATINGS (see Financial Responsibility)
BULK LIQUIDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions, Liquid Waste)
BURNING AND BLENDING (see also Incineration, Used Oil)
• Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL (see Burning and Blending)
BY-PRODUCT (see Solid Waste, Mixed Waste)
CALIFORNIA LIST (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS (see State Authorization)
CAPACITY (see Siting)
CARBON FILTERS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
CEMENT KILN (see Incineration; see also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
CEMs (see Continuous Emissions Monitors)
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
CERCLA/RCRA INTERFACE (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
CERTIFICATION (see also Closure, Generators, Post-Closure, Waste Minimization)
CHANGE DURING INTERIM STATUS (see Interim Status Process)
CHANGING FEDERAL REGULATIONS (see State Authorization)
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also SW-846, Listed Hazardous Waste,
Hazardous Waste Identification)
• Aqueous Waste
• Blasting Caps
• SUBKEY WORD 2
Keyword 1st

-------
• Corrosive Wastes
• Dilution
• EP Toxicity
• Explosive Wastes
• Flammable
• Ignitability
• Lead
• Reactive Wastes
• TCLP
• Toxicity
CHEMICAL DEODORANTS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION (see Treatment)
CHLORINATION TANK (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
CHROMIUM (see Exclusions)
CWIL ENFORCEMENT (see Enforcement; see also Compliance)
CLEAN AIR ACT (see also Incineration, Used Oil, TSDFs)
CLEAN CLOSURE (see Closure Process)
CLEAN WATER ACT (see also Exclusions)
• NPDES Facilities
• Wastewater
CLEANUP STANDARDS (see Corrective Action)
CLOSURE (see Interim Status Process)
CLOSURE PLAN (see Closure Process)
CLOSURE PROCESS (see also Interim Status Process, Post-Closure, TSDFs)
• Clean Closure
• Closure Plan
• Closure Requirements
• Closure Standards
• Partial Closure
• Permitting
• Public Participation
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS (see Closure Process)
CLOSURE STANDARDS (see Closure Process)
COAL (See Mining Waste)
COAL TAR/COKE (see also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
COLLECTION PROGRAMS (see Household Hazardous Waste)
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
COMPATIBILITY (see also Containers, Liners, Minimum Technological Requirements,
Tank System)
• SUBKEY WORD 3
Kcyword.ISL

-------
COMPLIANCE (see also Enforcement, Interim Status Process)
Inspections
COMPLIANCE MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES (see also Corrective Action, Enforcement, State Authorization)
COMPRESSED GAS CYLINDERS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CONSTRUCTION (see also Interim Status Process)
• New Unit
CONTAINED-IN (see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
CONTAINERS
• Empty
CONTAINMENT (see Secondary Containment)
CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Corrective
Action)
CONTAMINATED SOIL (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Corrective Action)
CONTINGENCY PLAN
• Spills
CONTINUING RELEASES (see Corrective Action)
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORS (see Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
CORPORATE GUARANTEE (see Financial Responsibility)
CORRECTIVE ACTION (see also Groundwater Monitoring,
Enforcement, Interim Status Process, Permit Conditions)
• Administrative Order
• Area of Contamination (AOC)
• Cleanup Standards
• Contaminated Groundwater
• Contaminated Soil
• Continuing Releases
• Corrective Action Management Unit
• RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA)
• Regulated Unit
• Release
• Remediation
• Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs)
• Voluntary Cleanups
CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT (See Corrective Action)
CORROSIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
COST (see Financial Responsibility)
COST ESTIMATES (see Financial Responsibility)
• SUBKEY WORD 4
Keyword 1st

-------
COVER DESIGN (see Final Cover)
CREOSOTE (see Wood Treatment, Hazardous Waste Identification)
CYANIDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification; see also SW-846)
DATA
Noncompliance
DE MINIMIS (see also Listed Hazardous Waste)
DEADLINES (see Permit Process; see also State Authorization)
DEFINITION (see Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Listed Hazardous Waste,
Regulated Unit, Treatment)
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY (see Permit Process)
DELISTING (see also Appendix VIII, Appendix IX, Hazardous Waste Identification,
Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
• Temporary Exclusion
• VHS Model
DENIAL (see Permit Process under Permit Denial)
DENTAL AMALGAM (see Scrap Metal)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) (see Federal Facilities)
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) (see Federal Facilities; see also Mixed Waste)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) (see Generators, Transporters)
DERiVED-FROM RULE (see also Mixture Rule)
• Residue
DESTRUCTION REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (DRE) (see Incineration)
DETECTION LIMITS (see Analytic Methods)
DETECTION MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
DIBUTYLIN DIFLUORIDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
DILUTION (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste; see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
DIOXIN (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal Restrictions, RCRA/CERCLA
Interface)
DISCARDED MATERIALS (see Solid Waste; see also Land Disposal
Restrictions, RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
DISCHARGE (see Wastewater; see also Spills)
DISPOSAL (see also Land Disposal Facilities, Land Disposal Restrictions, Recycle, TSDFs)
DO-IT-YOURSELFERS (DIYERS) (see Used Oil)
DOD (see Department of Defense, Federal Facilities)
DOE (see Department of Energy, Federal Facilities)
DOT (see Department of Transportation, Generators; see also Transporters
DOUBLE LINER (see Minimum Technological Requirements)
DRE (see Incineration under Destruction Removal Efficiency)
DREDGED SEDIMENTS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
• SUBKEY WORD 5
Keyword.Ist

-------
DRILLING FLUIDS (see Energy Exploration Wastes)
DRINKING WATER
DRIP PADS
DRUM SHREDDING UNIT (see Treatment)
DUST
DUST SUPPRESSION (see also HSWA, Disposal, Used Oil)
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Incineration)
ELECTROPLATING (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Solvents)
• Pickle Liquor
• Zinc Plating
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS (see Exclusions)
EMERGENCY PERMIT
EMISSION CONTROL WASTES (see Sludge)
EMPTY (see Containers, Tank System)
ENERGY EXPLORATION WASTES (see also Mining Waste)
• Drilling Fluids
ENFORCEMENT (see also Compliance)
• Administrative Order
• Civil Enforcement
• Enforcement Action
ENFORCEMENT ACTION (see Enforcement)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
EP TOXICITY (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EPA I.D. NUMBER (see also Generators, Transporters, TSDFs, Notification)
• Identification
• Identification Numbers
EQUIVALENCY (see Test Methods)
EXCLUSIONS (see also Agricultural Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Recycle, Solid
Waste, Wastewater)
• Chromium
• Elementary Neutralization Units
• Exemption
• Filter Press
• Fossil Fuels
• Gaseous Emissions
• Mining Waste
• Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
EXEMPTION (see Exclusions)
EXPANSIONS (see Permit Conditions; see also Interim Status Process)
• SUBKEY WORD 6
Kcyword.IsL

-------
EXPLORATION WASTE (see Mining Waste under Energy Exploration Waste)
EXPLOSIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Transporters, Manifest)
EXPOSURE INFORMATION (see Risk Assessment)
EXTENSION (see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
F-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Regulated Unit)
FACILITY (see TSDFs)
FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
FEDERAL FACILITIES
• DOD
• DOE
• Inventory
• Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
FERROUS METALS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FIFRA (see Agricultural Waste)
FILTER PRESS (see Exclusions)
FINAL COVER (see also Closure)
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (see also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
• Bond Ratings
• Corporate Guarantee
• Cost
• Cost Estimates
• Financial Test
• Insurance
• Liability
• Liability Coverage
FINANCIAL TEST (see Financial Responsibility)
FLAMMABLE (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FORMALDEHYDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FOSSIL FUELS (see Mining Waste, Exclusions)
FREE LIQUIDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions, Paint Filter Test; see also SW-846)
FREON (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels, Used Oil)
FURNACE (see Incineration)
GAS CONDENSATE (see Land Disposal Facilities)
GAS PROCESSING WASTES
GASEOUS EMISSIONS (see Exclusions)
• SUBKEY WORD 7
Keyword.Ist

-------
GENERATORS (see also Hazardous Waste Identification, Import, Export of Hazardous
Waste)
• Accumulation
• Biennial Reports
• Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
• DOT
• Manifest
• Small Quantity Generator
• Universities
GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES (see Subpart X, Land Disposal Facilities)
GROUNDWATER MONITORING (see also Post-Closure)
• Alternate Concentration Limit (ACL)
• Aquifer
• Assessment Monitoring
• Compliance Monitoring
• Detection Monitoring
• Groundwater Standards
• Hydrogeological Data
• Monitoring
• Student’s T Test
• Unsaturated Zone Monitoring
• VHS Model
• Well Construction
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS (see Groundwater Monitoring)
GUIDANCE
HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE AMENDMENTS (HSWA) (see also Corrective
Action, Delisting, Joint Permitting, Land Disposal Restrictions, Leachate Collection)
• HSWA Provisions
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS (see also Appendix VIII, Appendix IX, Corrective Action,
Delisting)
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS (see also Burning and Blending, Incineration, Used Oil)
• Fuel
• Waste-Derived Fuel
• Waste-as-Fuel
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION (see also Characteristic Hazardous Waste,
Listed Hazardous Waste)
• Aerosol Cans
• Asbestos
• Ballast Fluid
• SUBKEY WORD 8
Keyword.IsL

-------
• Batteries
• Carbon Filters
• Chemical Deodorants
• Compressed Gas Cylinders
• Contained-In
• Contaminated Groundwater
• Contaminated Soil
• Creosote
• Cyanide
• Definition
• Dibutylin Difluoride
• Dredged Sediments
• Electric Arc Furnace
• F-Wastes
• Ferrous Metals
• Food Processing Waste
• Formaldehyde
• Freon
• High Tech Wastes
• Iron Sponge
• Manufacturing Process Units
• Mercury
• Metals
• Munitions
• Oily Waste
• Paint Waste
• Phosphate Wastes
• Process Wastes
• Regulated Wastes
• Smelting Waste
• Soil
• TCLP
• TNT
• Toxicity
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION RULE (HWIR)
• Contaminated Media
HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTATION (see Import)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
HEALTH ASSESSMENTS (see Risk Assessment)
• SUBKEY WORD 9
Kcyword.Ist

-------
HIGH TECH WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Subtitle D)
Collection Programs
HOUSEHOLD WASTES (see Solid Waste)
HSWA (see Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HSWA PROVISIONS (see Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HWIR (see Hazardous Waste Identification Rule)
HYDROGEOLOGICAL DATA (see Groundwater Monitoring)
IDENTIFICATION (see EPA LD. Number)
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS (see EPA I.D. Number)
IGNITABILITY (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
IMPORT (see also Generators, Transporters)
• Hazardous Waste Importation
INCINERATION (see also Subpart X under Thermal Treatment)
• Baghouse Dust
• BIF Rule
• Boiler
• Cement Kiln
• Destruction Removal Efficiency (DRE)
• Electric Arc Furnace
• Furnace
• Hazardous Waste Combuster
• Hazardous Waste Fuels
• Incinerator Residue
• Incinerators
• Industrial Furnace
• Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards
• POHCs
• Scrubber Water
• System Removal Efficiency (SRE)
• Trial Bum
• Waste Burning
INCINERATOR RESIDUE (see Incineration)
INCINERATORS (see Incineration)
INCOMPLETE PART B’S (see Permit Application)
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (see Incineration)
INSPECTIONS (see Compliance)
INSURANCE (see Financial Responsibility)
INTERIM AUTHORIZATION (see State Authorization)
• SUBKEY WORD 10
Kcyword.Isi

-------
INTERIM STATUS PROCESS (see also Construction)
• Change During Interim Status
• Closure
• Corrective Action
• Loss of Interim Status
• Obtaining Interim Status
• Protective Filers
INVENTORY (see Federal Facilities)
IRON FOUNDRY WASTE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
IRON SPONGE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
JOINT PERMITTING (see State Authorization, Permit Process)
K-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
LABORATORY ANALYSIS (see Analytic Methods)
LABORATORY WASTES
LAND BAN (see Land Disposal Restrictions under Land Disposal Ban)
LAND DISPOSAL (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LAND DISPOSAL BAN (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (see also Closure, Post-Closure, Minimum Technological
Requirements, Land Disposal Restrictions, Surface Impoundment)
• Gas Condensate
• Geologic Repositories
• Land Disposal
• Land Treatment
• Landfill
• Landfill Gas
• Waste Piles
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
• BDAT
• Bulk Liquids
• California List
• Case-by-Case Extension
• Free Liquids
• Land Disposal Ban
• National Variance
• No-Migration Variance
• Notification
• Treatment Standards
LAND TREATMENT (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LANDFILL (see Land Disposal Facilities)
• SUBKEY WORD 11
Kcyword.I c

-------
LANDFILL GAS (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LARGE QUANTITY HANDLER (see Universal Wastes)
LARGE VOLUME WASTE (see Mining Waste)
LEACHATE (see also Appendix Vifi)
LEACHATE COLLECTION/DETECTION SYSTEM (see Minimum Technological
Requirements)
LEAD (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
LEAK DETECTION (see Secondary Containment)
LEAKAGE (see Secondary Containment)
LIABILITY (see Financial Responsibility)
LIABILITY COVERAGE (see Financial Responsibility)
LINERS (see Minimum Technological Requirements; see also Land Disposal Facilities)
LIQUID WASTE (see also Land Disposal Restrictions, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
• Absorbents
• Bulk Liquids
• Non-Hazardous Liquids
LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Solid Waste, Delisting, Characteristic Hazardous
Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Dioxin)
• Chlorination Tank
• Commercial Chemical Products
• Definition
• F-Wastes
• Iron Foundry Waste
• K-Wastes
• Off-Specification
• P-Wastes
• Sole Active Ingredient
• Steel Foundries
• Toluene
• U-Wastes
• Wastewater Treatment Sludge
LOCATION (see Siting)
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS (see Interim Status Process; see also Permit Process)
LOW LEVEL WASTE (see Mixed Waste)
MAJOR HANDLERS
MANAGEMENT STANDARDS (see Used Oil)
MANIFEST (see Generators; see also Transporters, DOT, Waste Minimization)
MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
MARKETER (see Used Oil)
• SUBKEY WORD 12
Kcyword.Ist

-------
MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACT) STANDARDS (see
Incineration)
MERCURY (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
METALS (see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
MINERAL PROCESSING (see also Mining Waste)
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS (see Tank System)
MINIMUM TECHNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS (MTR) (see also Compatibility, HSWA,
Release, Surface Impoundment, Land Disposal, TSDFs)
• Double Liner
• Leachate Collection/Detection System
• Liners
• Retrofit
MINING WASTE (see also Exclusions)
• Bevill Amendment
• Boiler Slag
• Coal
• Energy Exploration Waste
• Fossil Fuels
• Large Volume Waste
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS (see Subpart X)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste)
MIXED WASTE
• Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
• By-Product
• Low Level Waste
• Mixed Radioactive Wastes
• Mixed Radioactive/Radioactive Wastes
• NRC
MIXTURE RULE (see also Derived-from-Rule)
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS (see also Permit Process, Permit Conditions)
MODELS
MODIFICATIONS (see Permit Process under Permit Modification)
MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
MORE STRINGENT/BROADER IN SCOPE (see State Authorization)
MUNICIPAL LANDFILL (see also Solid Waste)
• Sanitary Landfill
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION (see also Incineration)
MUNITIONS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
• SUBKEY WORD 13
Keyword.IsI

-------
NATIONAL VARIANCE (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
NATURAL GAS
NEW UNIT (see Construction)
NO-MIGRATION VARIANCE (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
NONCOMPLIANCE (see Data)
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUIDS (see Liquid Waste)
NOTIFICATION (see Universal Wastes, Land Disposal Restrictions; see also Burning and
Blending, EPA I.D. Number)
NPDES FACILITIES (see Clean Water Act, Wastewater)
NRC (see Mixed Waste)
OB/OD (see Open Burning/Open Detonation)
OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS (see Interim Status Process)
OFF-SITE FACILITIES
OFF-SPECIFICATION (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
OILY WASTE (see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
OMNIBUS PROVISION
ON-SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT (see also Permit Process, Generators)
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION (OB/OD) (see Subpart X, Federal Facilities)
OPERATING LIFE (see Permit Conditions)
OSHA (see also Health and Safety)
OWNER/OPERATOR (see also Permit Application)
P-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
PAINT FILTER TEST (see also SW-846)
Free Liquids
PAINT WASTE (see Hazardous Waste Identification; see also Listed Hazardous Waste,
Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
PART A PERMIT APPLICATION (see Permit Application; see also Interim Status Process)
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION (see Permit Application; see also Interim Status Process)
PARTIAL CLOSURE (see Closure Process)
PCBs
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (see Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
PERMIT APPLICATION
• Incomplete Part B’s
• Owner/Operator
• Part A Permit Application
• Part B Permit Application
• Pre-Construction Ban
• Signatures
• Withdrawals
• SUBKEY WORD 14
Keyword.Isi

-------
PERMIT CONDITIONS (see also Corrective Action, Storage, TSDFs)
• Expansions
• Operating Life
• Permit Requirements
• Permit Standards
PERMIT DENIAL (see Permit Process)
PERMIT MODIFICATION (see Permit Process)
PERMIT PROCESS
• Appeals
• Deadlines
• Delegation of Authority
• Joint Permitting
• On-Site Waste Management
• Permit Denial
• Permit Modification
• Permitting
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (see Permit Conditions)
PERMIT STANDARDS (see Permit Conditions)
PERMITTING (see Closure Process, Permit Process)
PERSONNEL TRAINING
PESTICIDES (see Agricultural Waste; see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
PETITIONS (see also Exclusions, Delisting, Land Disposal Restrictions)
PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTES (see also Exclusions, Delisting)
• Refinery Waste
• Used Oil
PHOSPHATE WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
PICKLE LIQUOR (see Electroplating)
POHCS (see Incineration)
POST-CLOSURE (see also Closure, Cost Estimates, Financial Responsibility, Groundwater
Monitoring, Permit Process)
POTW (See Wastewater)
PRE-CONSTRUCTION BAN (see Permit Application)
PRE-HSWA PROVISIONS (see State Authorization)
PRECIOUS METALS (see Recycle)
PRIMARY TREATMENT (see Treatment)
PROCEDURE (see Test Methods)
PROCESS WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS (see Used Oil)
PROTECTIVE FILERS (see Interim Status Process)
• SUBKEY WORD 15
Keyword.Isc

-------
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (see also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) (see also SW-846)
RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste under Mixed
Radioactive/Radioactive Wastes)
RAGS AND WIPERS (see Solvents)
RCRA (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENT (RFA) (see Corrective Action)
RCRA/CERCLA INTERFACE
• CERCLA (Superfund)
• RCRA
• Tax
• Treatability Study
RD&D PERMIT
REACTIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
RECLAMATION (see also Solid Waste, Recycle, Solvents, Used Oil)
• Recovery
• Unused Materials
RECOVERED OIL (see Used Oil)
RECOVERY (see Reclamation)
RECYCLE (see also Reclamation, Solid Waste)
• Precious Metals
• Regeneration
• Reuse
• Use-Constituting Disposal
REFINERY WASTE (see Petroleum Refinery Wastes)
REGENERATION (see Recycle)
•REGULATED UNIT (see also Corrective Action, Groundwater Monitoring)
• Defmition
• F-Wastes
REGULATED WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Solid Waste)
REGULATION
RELEASE (see Corrective Action, Secondary Containment)
REMEDIATION (see Corrective Action)
REPORTING INFORMATION (see also Generators, Notification)
RESIDUE (see Derived-from Rule)•
RETROFIT (see Minimum Technological Requirements, Surface Impoundment)
REUSE (see Recycle)
RFA (see RCRA Facility Assessment)
RISK (see Risk Assessment)
• SUBKEY WORD 16
Kcyword.Isi

-------
RISK ANALYSIS (see Risk Assessment)
RISK ASSESSMENT
• Exposure Information
• Health Assessments
• Risk
• Risk Analysis
RUN-OFF
SAMPLE ANALYSIS (see Analytic Methods)
SAMPLING (see Analytic Methods)
SAMPLING PLAN (see Analytic Methods)
SANITARY LANDFILL (see Municipal Landfill)
SCRAP METAL (see also Solid Waste)
• Dental Amalgam
SCRUBBER (see also Sludge)
• Baghouse Dust
SCRUBBER WATER (see Incineration)
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (see also Tank System, Minimum Technological
Requirements)
• Containment
• Leak Detection
• Leakage
• Release
• Sumps
SECONDARY MATERIALS (see Solid Waste)
SECONDARY TREATMENT (see Treatment)
SECURITY
SEWAGE SLUDGE (see Wastewater)
SHAM RECYCLING (see Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
SHOOTING RANGES
SIC CODES
SIGNATURES (see Permit Application)
SITING (see also Public Participation)
• Capacity
• Location
SKINNER LIST (see Appendix IX; see also Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
SLUDGE (see also Wastewater)
• Baghouse Dust
• Emission Control Wastes
• Scrubber
• SUBKEY WORD 17
Keyword.Isc

-------
• Sludge Dryers
SLUDGE DRYERS (see Sludge)
SMALL QUANTITY HANDLER (see Universal Wastes)
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (see Generators)
SMELTING WASTE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOIL (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
SOLID WASTE (see also Recycle, Hazardous Waste Identification)
• Batteries
• By-Product
• Defmition
• Discarded Materials
• Household Wastes
• Regulated Wastes
• Scrap Metal
• Secondary Materials
• Spent Materials
• Subtitle D
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS (SWMUs) (see Corrective Action)
SOLIDIFICATION (see Treatment)
SOLVENTS (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Wastewater, Electroplating, Reclamation,
Recovery, Recycle)
• Rags and Wipers
• Spent Solvents
SPENT MATERIALS (see Solid Waste)
SPENT SOLVENTS (see Solvents)
SPILLS (see Contingency Plan; see also Corrective Action)
SRE (see System Removal Efficiency)
STATE AUTHORIZATION
• Authorized States
• Capability Assessments
• Changing Federal Regulations
• Interim Authorization
• Joint Permitting
• More Stringent/Broader in Scope
• Pre-HSWA Provisions
• State Laws
• State Permits
• State Programs
• SUBKEY WORD 18
Kcyword.Ist

-------
• State Regulations
STATE LAWS (see State Authorization)
STATE PERMITS (see State Authorization)
STATE PROGRAMS (see State Authorization)
STATE REGULATIONS (see State Authorization)
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
STEEL FOUNDRIES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
STORAGE (see also Containers, Hazardous Waste Fuels, Tank System, Permit Conditions)
STUDENT’S T TEST (see Groundwater Monitoring)
SUBPART X (see also Permit Application, Federal Facilities, Characteristic Hazardous
Waste)
• Geologic Repositories
• Miscellaneous Units
• Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
• Thermal Treatment
SUBPART CC (see also Air Emissions)
SUBPARTS AA AND BB
SUBTITLE D (see Solid Waste)
SUMPS (see Secondary Containment)
SUPERFUND (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface under CERCLA)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (see also Land Disposal Facilities)
• Retrofit
SURFACE WATER (see also Wastewater, Clean Water Act)
SW-846
SWMUs (see Solid Waste Management Units)
SYSTEM REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (see Incineration)
TANK SYSTEM (see also Generators, Secondary Containment)
• Ancillary Equipment
• Empty
• Minimum Shell Thickness
• Tanks
TANKS (see Tank System)
TAX (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TCLP (TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE) (see Characteristic
Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION (see Delisting)
TEST METHODS (see also Analytic Methods, SW-846)
• Equivalency
• Procedure
• SUBKEY WORD 19
Keyword Isi

-------
THERMAL TREATMENT (see Subpart X; see also Incineration)
TNT (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
TOLUENE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT UNITS (see Exclusions, Treatment)
TOXICITY (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
TRANSFER FACILITIES (see Transporters)
TRANSPORTATION (see Transporters)
TRANSPORTERS (see also Generators)
• Transfer Facilities
• Transportation
TREATABILITY STUDY (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TREATED WASTE (see Treatment)
TREATMENT
• Biological Treatment
• Chemical Stabilization
• Defmition
• Drum Shredding Unit
• Primary Treatment
• Secondary Treatment
• Solidification
• Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
• Treated Waste
TREATMENT STANDARDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDFs) (see also Interim Status
Process, Permit Process, Storage, Treatment, Land Disposal Facilities)
• Activellnactive Facilities
• Facility
TRIAL BURN (see Incineration)
TSDFs (see Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities)
U-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
UNDERGROUND INJECTION (see also Land Disposal Restrictions, Corrective Action,
Disposal)
UNIVERSAL WASTES
• Large Quantity Handler
• Notification
• Small Quantity Handler
UNIVERSITIES (see Generators; see also EPA ID. Number)
UNSATURATED ZONE (see Groundwater Monitoring under Unsaturated Zone Monitoring)
UNUSED MATERIALS (see Reclamation)
• SUBKEY WORD 20
Kcyword.IsI

-------
USE-CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL (see Recycle)
USED OIL (see also Burning and Blending, Hazardous Waste Fuels, Petroleum Refinery
Wastes)
• Do-It-Yourselfers (DIYERs)
• Fuel
• Management Standards
• Marketer
• Processor Requirements
• Recovered Oil
• Used Oil Filters
• Waste Oil
USED OIL FILTERS (see Used Oil)
VARIANCE (see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
VHS MODEL (see Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
VOLUNTARY CLEANUPS (see Corrective Action)
WASTE ANALYSIS (see also Analytic Methods, SW-846)
WASTE-AS-FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels)
WASTE BURNING (see Incineration)
WASTE-DERIVED FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels)
WASTE EXCHANGE PROGRAM (see Waste Minimization)
WASTE MINIMIZATION (see also Generators, HSWA, Manifest)
• Waste Exchange Program
WASTE OIL (see Used Oil; see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
WASTE PILES (see Land Disposal Facilities)
WASTE STREAM
WASTEWATER (see also Clean Water Act, Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal
Restrictions, Mixture Rule)
• Discharge
• NPDES Facilities
• POTW
• Sewage Sludge
• Sludge
• Wastewater Treatment
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (see Wastewater)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
WELL CONSTRUCTION (see Groundwater Monitoring)
WITHDRAWALS (see Permit Application)
WOOD PRESERVING (see Wood Treatment)
WOOD TREATMENT (see also Listed Hazardous Waste)
• SUBKEY WORD 21
Kcywoid.Is*

-------
• Creosote
• Wood Preserving
ZINC PLATING (see Electroplating)
• SUBKEY WORD 22
Kcyword.Ist

-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY
C OMPENDIUM
Key Word Index
*Hotljne Summaries

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX page NO
ABSORBENTS
(See Liquid Waste) EREF / I
ACCUMULATION
(See Generators) (See also Tank System) XRRF / /
AC !.
(See Alternate Concentration Limit, Groundwater Monitoring) REEF / I
ACTIVE INGREDIENT
(Sea Listed Nazardous Waste under Sole Active Ingredient) XREF / I
ACTIVE! INACTIVE FACILITY
(See Treatment, Storage, and Diapoeal Facilities) REEF / /
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
(Sea Enforcesiant, Corrective Action) XREF / /
AEROSOL CANS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) REEF / /
AGR ICULTURAL WASTE
(Sea also Excluaiona) REEF / /
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS VERSUS SOIL AMENDMENTS 9493 1987(01) 09/03/87
FARMER EXEMPTION INTERPRETATION 9455 1982(01) 07/07182
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE NOT UNDER AGRICULTURAL WASTE ERCLUS1ON 9441 1900 (02) 00/19/00
FIFRA
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES. DISPOSAL OP. FIFRA INTERFACE 9441 1905(28) 07/16/85
END-USERS OF CNLORDIMEFORM ERW4PTION 9441 1990(04) 02/14/90
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WIN PESTIC iDE PRODUCTS 9444 1907(40) 09/09/07
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF 9441 1906110) 02/11/06
Pesticides
CHLGRDANE AND WEPTACNLOR PESTICIDE WASTE 9444 1900(10) 05/03/08
CLARIFICATION ON NE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 9444 1985108) 05/24/05
CO)4BINED STORAGE OF PBSTICIDE WASTES 9403 1984102) 06/20/04
CONTAINERS, TRIPLE RINSING FOR FERTILIZER 9441 1904(10) 08/01/04
OELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,5-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES 9433 1907(26) 10/20/07
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS 9444 1907(40) 09/09/87
PESTICIDE APPL iCATOR WARNING RINSE WATER 9441 1985(42) 12/13/85
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASNING RINSEWATER 9443 1905(05) 07/22/85
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT 9457 1907(01) 03/25/87
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREANENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM 9471 1900(04) 10/27/00
PESTICIDE STANDARDS FOR FORMALDENYDE AND PARAFORMALOEHYDE S444 1969 (02) 03/14/89
PESTICIDES CONTAINING A 261 331e 1 COMPOUND AS A SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT 9444 1981(05) 09/to/El
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER 9441 1992(43) 12/15/92
SOIL CONTAMINATED WIN CNLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION 9444 1966(20) 09/29/06
SOIL CONTAMINATED WIN PESTICIDE 9441 19 87(21) 04/08187

-------
07/0 5/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 2
fl U
9445
9445
9498
9445
9443
9445
9445
9443
9441
9433
9443
9445
9445
9443
9445
9445
9445
9443
9443
9441
1994 (01)
1993 (00)
1994(093
19 04 (02)
1992(04)
1992 (03)
1987(035)
1987(26)
1905(07)
1984 (05)
1907(31)
1993(05)
1993(07)
1986119)
198 5(04)
1.904 (05)
1987 1021
19871291
3 987(32)
1906(08)
I ,
01/01/94
li/os/fl
08/17/54
04/23/04
08/26 /9 2
04/08/93
it / IT/ B ’
11/12/87
02/13/85
12/11/84
12 /0 7/87
12/07/93
09 /02/93
05 ,0 5/fl
06/30/85
12/20/84
09/26/87
11/10/87
06/23/87
01/24/86
9441 1987(153 03/11/87
9443.1987(161 08/13/61
9441 1986(443 05/30/96
XREF / /
9498 1994(091 08/17/94
9441. 1955(253 08/03/95
9573 15941013 01/10/94
9499 I595(OU 01/30/95
9531 1993(01) 02 )23/93
9551 1990(083 10/24/90
9551 1991(02) 03/17/91
9489 1992(02) 08/27/92
9523 1994(01) 10/17/94
9651 1.991404) 01 )30/91
9480 1996(02) 02/01/96
9480 1996403) 03/01/96
9534 1997(013 03/27/97
XREF / /
XR8P / /
6011.5 CONTAMII1ATRD WITH CHLORDAOIE AND HEPTACNLQR DUR1NG THEATHENI’ OF BUILDINGS FOR TERMITES
VEHICLE FILTERS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDES
WASHWATERS GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS
AIR EMISSIONS
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMSUSTORS
EPA • S INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTION IN 40 CPA 261 3 (e) (2)1 iv) (F) • A ((EM SEC t ION OF EPA ’ S REGULATIONS ON CARBN4ATE LISTING RULE
IMPACT CF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND CmeUSTIOH STRATEGT ON OHIO S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
INCLUSION OF EMISSIONS FROM OR/OD WIlTS IN lEE HEALTH RISI ASSESSNONT FOR A CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL. FACILITY
INTERPRETATION OP CERTAIN CONNECTORS AS • PLANGES
HO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS. WA
NO-MIGRAtION PETITION FOE SUN R8FININ0, OK
RCRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON SENSENI STRIPPERS AT WEC REFINERY
REGULATION OF FURL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATHENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
Subpart CC
PRSOUENTLY ASEED QUESTIONS OW TIlE 40 CFR PART 264/26S, SUBPART CC AIR EMISSION STANDARDS
‘REMDVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR SUBPART CC COMPLIANCE
APPLICABILITY OF TIlE SUBPART CC RCRA AIR EMISSION REGULATIOWS TO BULK SOLIDS TANKS AND A SLUDGE RECEIVING TANK
A1RBAG INFLATORS
(See Listed Hazardous Waste under Coeelercial Chemical Products)
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL)
(See Groundwater )ionitoring) (See also Appendix VI I II
ANALYTIC METHODS
(See also Appendix VIII. Appendix IX, SW-846)
WSE OF TOTA l. WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CI(ARACTERISTIC OETEEMINATIONS
ADDITIONAL ANALYTRS FOR ((WIN TARGET ANALYTS LIST IN WASTEWATER
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR NAEARDOUS WASTE COMSUSTORS
ANALYTICAL. METNODS/EP TOXICITY TEST/REFERENCE STDS
ASTh 04982-89 (METHOD 81 AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TEST1NG FOR 1GNITABILITY
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATIGN USING OC/MS METHODS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OP TREATED WASTES - USE OP 5W-846 METNODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CRUSNING WASTE PRIOR TO EP TEST
DIOXIN STANDARD USED TO TEST GAS CNRa4ATOGRAP1IY COLUMNS, HANDLING OF
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
INAPPROPRIATe USE OF METI(OO 1311 (TCLP( AS AN ALTERNATIVE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS IN METHOD 0240
LABORATORY EQUI PI4EI(T USED ‘10 RUN THE TOXI CITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCI.P(
RCRA METHODS AND CA ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES(
SW-64S (cATHODE MANUAL
TCLP IN THE LAND DISFOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTI FICATION PROGRAM
USE OF THE METHOD OF STaNDARD ED TILONS
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
Detection Limits
DRLISTIIC PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4 • S-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
9431 1987(76) 10/28/07

-------
07/06/98 KEYWOED INDEX Page NO 3
DETECTION LIMIT FOR EP-LEACNATE CONCENTRATION OF SELENIUM 9443 1986(06) 03/12/86
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1986(19) 12/09/86
NEALTN BASED VALUES FOR CHEMICAL LIST 9445 1989(02) 07/18/89
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR PAH S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES 9551 1989(04) 07/06/89
METAL, E061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMEHT-DELISTING PETITION 9433 1987(18) 08/07/87
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS. INFORMATION REQUIRED 9441 1986(08) 01/24/86
Laboratory Analyaia
•LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN 9441 1985(11) 03/01/85
PN TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE 9443 1983(03) 02/01/83
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CHEMICALS. PROPOSED 9481 1986(02) 07/25/86
ANALYSIS OF FLUFF MATERIALS 9442 1991 (02) 02/22/91
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER. REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF 9481 1985(01) 10/15/85
ASm STANDARDS IN THE RCRA PROGRAM 9445 1987 (05) 12/21/87
CLARIFICATION OF METHOD 8260 CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND WASTZ TYPE 9445 1993 (02) 03/11/93
CLARIFICATION ON MATRIX SPIKES FOR METHOD 8310 9445 1992(02) 12/22/92
CLARIFICATION ON WHETHER OR HOT A LABORATORY MUST USE THE “SW-846 ‘A ORGANIC METNODS WHICH WERE RECENTLY PROMULGATED 9433 1994 (01) 10/12/94
EXEMPTION FROM PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION STEP IN TCLP 9442 1991(13) 10/09/91
GLASS FIBER FILTERS FOR USE IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY C)(ARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP) 9443 1986(19) 09/30/86
HOLDING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER 9441 1992(14) 06/03/92
ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING SONICATION(3S50) RATHER THAN SOXNLET(3540.3541) 9445 1994 (02) 03/10/94
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP) 9443 1986(17) 09/03/86
LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM 9472 1986 (02) 01/29/86
LABORATORY SAMPLE EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY TO SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - DIOXIN 9441 1987(29) 04/30/87
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD 9443 1987(24) 11/05/87
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE 9442 1991(12) 08/30/91
MATRIX SPIKE IN TCLP PROCEDURE 9442 1991(03) 03/19/91
METHODS 1310 AND 1330 EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE 9443 1987(14) 08/11/81
METHODS 8240 AND 8260 DIFFERENTIATION AND EQUIVALENCY 9442 1991)06) 05/09/91
RCRA TESTING TECHNIQUES 9445 1987(03) 10/20/87
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR GRAPHITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL SW-846 METALS METHODS 9445 1994 (03) 03/10/94
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL 9441 1989(12) 03/31/89
SW-846. THIED EDITION. NDLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES 9445 1987(06) 06/30/8?
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE 9442 1991(08) 06/13/91
TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE SAMPLE 9443 1987(33) 12/31/87
Sample Analyaza
LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN 9441 1985(11) 03/01/85
5W-846 TEST METHODS 9554 1991(04) 12/01/91
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES 9445 1987(04) 12/04/87
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE TC RULE 9442 1991(17) 10/01/91
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS 9441 1992(19) 01/07/92
DEFINITION OF HOLDING TIME 9445 1993 (01) 01/21/93
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE EASE 9433 1987(16) 07/31/87
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO SPAS MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1986(20) 12/11/86
DILUTION OF TEST SAMPLING 9442 1991 (04) 03/25/91
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED 9433 1986(04) 02/14/86
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES 9442 1989(02) 01/25/89
HANDLING AND ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES CONTAINING VOC’S 9442 1991(15) 12/17/91
LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM 9472 1986(02) 01/29/86
LABORATORY SAMPLE EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY TO SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - DIOXIN 9441 1987(29) 04/30/87
MULTIPLE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE. METHOD 1320 9442 1988(06) 10/19/88
PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION PROCEDURE FOR TCLP SAMPLES OF DRY CELL BAtTERIES 9442 1991(07) 05/29/91
QC REVIEW OF PERMIT DATA 9442 1990(04) 11/01/90
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS. IMPLEMENTATION 9502 00-4 08/21/86
RCRA TEST METHODS & QA ACTIVITIES 9441 1988(31) 07/30/88
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPROVED METHOOS FOR SUBPART X PERMITS 9442 1990(03) 11/19/90

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 4
SURROGATE RECOVERY 9442 1991109) 06/19/91
SW-E46. THIRD EDITION. HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES 9445 1987106) 06/30/87
TOTAL CHRGMIW4 ANALYSIS 9443 1987111) 06/08/87
TOTAL CONCENTRATION USED TO DEMONSTRATE A WASTE DOES HOT EXHIEIT THE CHARACTERISTIC OF EP TOXICITY 9443 1989)01) 01/27/89
USE OF FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY )FTIRS) FOR HEADSPACE GAS SAMPLING ANALYSIS AND CEARACTERIZATION 9441 1996)02) 03/21/96
Sampling
RESAI4PLING AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9481 1996)01) 10/01/96
AGITATB SAMPLES EVALUATED USING METHOD 1110 9441 1990)17 ) 06/29/90
CLARIFICATION ON SAMPLING AND DATA INTERPRETATION 9441 1992(26) 08/26/92
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE EASE 9433 1987(16) 07/31/87
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TREATMENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES 9433 1987(22) 10/02/87
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS- INFORMATION REQUIRED 9433 1986(041 02/14/86
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES 9442 1989)02) 01/25/89
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF LAB SAMPLES 9441 1989)20) 04/27/89
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 1985(03) 07/11/85
METAL. K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDI IENT-DELISTING PETITION 9433 1987(18) 08/07/87
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED TN USED OIL SAMPLING 9442 1991)11) 07/09/91
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTRWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION 9441 1991)01) 01/03/91
RCRA FACILITY ASEESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION 9512 80-4 08/21/8
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9433 1986)11 ) 04/24/86
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PET iTION FOR WASTES IN LMIDPILL TRENCHES 1986(21) 12/13/86
SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTIMATING VARIABILITY OF WASTES FOR DELISTING PETITIONS 9433 1986(22) 12/18/86
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL 9441 1989 (12) 03/31/89
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION 9433 1991(02) 04/26/91
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9923 00-14 03/14/86
TEST SAMPLES, EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE 9431 1989(03 ) 06/05/89
USE OF ALUMINUM CAP LINERS INSTEAD OF TEFLON FOR SOIL SAMPLE CONTAINERS 9502 1996(05] 11/26196
Sampling Plan
ANALYSIS OF RETESTING PROCEDURES PAPER 9481 1991(01) 10/16/91
CYANIDE FURNACE CRUCIELES TREATMENT 1990 (05) 09/26/90
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-EASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 9433 1987)21) 09/28/87
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR’S FLUORESCENT TUEES ARE NONHAIARDOUS 9441 1995)23) 16/22/95
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS F1.AN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY 9433 1990(06) 11/27/90
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN MID THE MIXTURE RULE 9433 1986)11) 04/24/86
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOE APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS 9433 1986)23) 12/30/86
SAMPLING PI.AN FOR DELISTIEG PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES 9433 1986 (21) 12/13/86
SURFACE II4POUHDI4ENT SAMPLING PLAN FOR HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE EASE 9484 1988(03) 06/20/88
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT
)Sea Tank System) XREF I /
API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
(See also Petroleum Refinery Wastes. Sludge, Waatewater) XREF / /
API SEPARATOR WASTEWATSR AND SLUDGE o3 1984)06) 04/01/84
PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE K051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE 9444 1987)20) 05/26/87
APFEALS
(See Permit Process) (See also Closure Process) XREF / /
APPENDIX IX
(See also Appendix VIII, Groundwater Monitoring) KREF / /

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 5
•APPENDIX VIII AND APPEMDIX IX 9445 1909)01) 06/01/69
•GROwIDWATER MONITORING APPENDIX 12) SAMPLING AND OFF-SITE RELEASES 9481 1997)02) 03/01/97
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CHm4ICAIJS, PROPGSSD 9481 1906)02) 07/25/06
INTERpRETATIoN OF TI l l RCRA GROUNDWATER MDNITCRIIIG REGULATIONS 94(1 19971011 02/26/97
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATNI4AY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS 9S51 19911041 01/30/91
Skinner L a n
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY 9433 19941031 11/01/94
‘SKINNER LIST 9445 1985106 ) 00/El/ OS
APPENDIX VIII
(See also ACL, Analytic Methods, Appendix IX, Groundwater Monitor ing Hazardous Constituents. Saispling) KREF / /
‘APPENDIX VIII AND APPENDIX IX 9445 1909)01) 06/01/89
‘APPENDIX VIII GROUNDWATER PiONT IOHIC 9445 2907101) 03/01/87
APPENDIX VIII COMSTITUENT5 IN GROUNDWATER. REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF 9491 19058*1) 10/15/85
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476 19071081 12/17/87
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. RCRA REGULATORY STATUS 9442 1994 8011 12/26/84
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA’S MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1906(20 ) 12/11/86
DELISTINO PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOE RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,5-T AND 5ILVEX PESTICIDES 9433 1987(26) 10/28/87
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENOII VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1906(19) 12/09/88
ENFORCING GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN RCRA PART S PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9514 1904 (011 08/16/84
INTERPRETATION OF THE RCRA GROUNDWATER MONITORING REGULATIONS 9401 1997 (Ii) 02/26/97
MATERIALS USED IN PERTILIIRR PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991 (05) 10/11/91
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREAThENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION 0441 1991801) 01/03/91
PONC SELECTION FOR RCEA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRIAL EURN - USE OF 1,2,3-TSICNI.CRO8ENZRNE 9400 1991(01) 02/05/91
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII CoMPouNDS 1986(231 12/10/66
SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTIMATING VARIABILITY OP WASTES FOR DELISTING PETITIONS 9433 1906(22) 12/10/86
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TOLUEIIE 944S 190S (01) 04/05/85
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS 9551 1991(04) 01/30/91
AQUEOUS WAfl
(See Characteristic hazardous Waste XRRP / /
AQU IFER
(See Groundwater MDnacoring) KREF / /
AREA OF CONTAMINATION )AOC)
(See Corrective Action) XREF / /
ASSESTOS
IEee Hazardous Wane Identiticatson) REEF / /
ASSESSMENT MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring) 219SF / /
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA(
(See Mixed Waste) HREP / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page NO 5
AUTHORIEED STATES
(See State Authorization) XREP / /
EAGNOUSS DUST
(See Incineration, Sludge) XREF / /
BALLAST FLUID
(See Haaardoó Waste Identification) XREF / /
BATTERIES
(See Solid Waste. Hazardous WaSte Identification) XREP / /
BOAT
(Sec Best Demonstrated Available Technology. Lend Disposal Restrictions) EREP / F
BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT)
(See Land Disposal Reetrictione( flaP / /
BEVILL EXCLUSION (AMENDMENT)
(See Mining Wane) XREF / /
BIENNIAL RBPORTS
(See Generators) XREF / /
SIP RULE
(See Incineration) XREF / I
BIPs
(See Boilers end Industrial Furnaces) XREF / /
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
(See Treatment) XREF / /
BLASTING CAPE
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste) XREP / F
BLENDING AND BURNING
(See Burning end Blending) EREP / /
BOILER
(See Incineration) XREF / /

-------
07/06/96 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 7
BOILER SLAG
(See Mining Waste) XREF / /
BOI LERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
ABILITY OF A NAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING E lF TO SPIKE METALS AND USE OF TEST DATA IN LIEU OF A TRIAL BURN 9498 1996 (03) 04/01/96
APPLICABILITY OF OMNIBUS AUTHORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION 5 a TP Y 9498 1996(05) 05/10/96
APPLICABILITY OF THE OMNIBUS AUTNORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996 (01) 02/26/96
EPA ’S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996(06) 05/23/96
BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFe)
ZREF / /
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR NAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS 9498 1994)09) 08/17/94
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATHENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES 9498 1994(13) 12/05/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES 9498 1994(08) 07/29/94
CLARIFICATION 15 A FACILITY THAT NAS A “PRIMARY PURPOSE” OF BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO ECRA REGULATIONS’ 9498 1994(07) 07/21/94
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT 9498 1994)03) 05/26/94
DETERMINATION ON WNETNSR OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE 9498 1994 (05) 07/14/94
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9498 1994(06) 07/20/94
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES 9498 1994 (04) 07/05/94
IMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO’S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS 9573 1994(01) 01/10/94
MINIMUM NEAT CONTENT REQUIREMSNTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN BIFa 9498 1994(02) 05/20/94
MINIMUM NEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR BNSRGY RECOVERY IN BIFe 9498 1994(11) 11/04/94
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT “POPPING FURNACE” 9489 1994 (02) 09/19/94
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS 9498 1994 (12) 11/08/94
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE 9494 1994(03) 06/07/94
USE OF METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE 9498 1995(01) 11/09/95
BOND RATINGS
(See Financial Responsibility) XREF / /
BULK LIQUIDS
(See Land Disposal Restrictions, Liquid Waste) KREF / /
BURNING AND BLENDING
(See also Incineration, Used Oil) ZRSF / /
“BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL 9442 1985(01) 12/01/65
“COOLDANT RECYCLING AND USED OIL PROCESSING 9592 1996(05) 11/01/96
“ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION 9495 1994(01) 05/01/94
“HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL MARKETERS 9453 1985(04) 11/01/85
“NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY 9443 1987)23) 10/01/87
“OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL 9454 1986(02) 02/01/86
“USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTIOMS HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY’ 9592 1994(11) 09/01/94
“WASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES THAT RESEMBLE CONVENTIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE 9561 1994(02) 07/01/94
APPLICABILITY OF 40 CFR PART 279 TO ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL 9592 1996(08) 11/27/96
APPLICABILITY OF USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORBENT MATERIALS 9592 1994(09) 09/28/94
ATOMIZER MULTI-OIL FUELED HEATERS, INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR 9495 1988(02) 09/22/88
BULKING OR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION 9432 1990(02) 03/01/90
BURNING OF USED OIL 9495 1989(02) 10/17/89
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9495 1986)09) 04/21/86
CLARIFICATION OF STATUS OF TRRATHENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL BLENDING ACTIVITIES 9494 1992(01) 11/27/92
CLARIFICATION OF TRSA’I7ISNT, AS DEFINED AT 40 CFR SECTION 260 10, AS IT RELATES TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BLENDING ACTIVITIES 9432 1995(02) 10/12/95

-------
07/06/98
XEYWORD INDEX
Page NO.
(See Solid Waste, Mixed Waete(
CALIFORNIA LIST
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
9528 1985(11)
9494 1986(05)
9432 1986(02)
9495 1985(03)
9494 1991(03)
9494 1986(QSa)
9528 1987(10)
9498 1994 (13)
9441 1987(981
9494 1986(06)
9498 1994(06)
9489 1987 (021
9494 1986(04)
9494 1987(02)
9494 1986(01)
9498 1994(11)
9494 1987(03)
9441 1991(17)
9494 1993 (01)
9498 1994(12)
9441 1993(21)
9442 1994 (05)
9494 1994 (01)
9494 1991 (02)
9441 1987(24)
9432 1986)04)
9494 1997101)
9495 1991 101)
9441 1987 142)
9441 1986)11)
9494 1986(02)
9441 1986(08)
9494 1985(03)
12 /01 185
04/11/86
01/03/86
12/12/8 5
04 /2 3/9 1
06/30/88
09/03/87
12/05/!4
12/24/87
12 /3 1/80
07/20/94
07 /22/87
04/11/ 86
04/15/ 87
02/09/86
11/04/94
08/31/87
11/04/9 1
09/14/93
11/08/94
11/01/93
04/1S/94
01/28/94
03/2 /91
04/15/87
01/21/86
OS/2 3/97
06/05 /9 1
06/09/87
02/11/86
03/19/86
01/24/86
10/11/85
9441 1984(20) 08/16/84
9441 1984(19) 08/15/84
9498.1994(02) 05/20/94
9442 1987 (84) 08/31/87
9495 1987 (81) 01/20/87
9521 1994(01) 10/ 17/9%
9461 1989(01) 01/03/89
9441 199S(B4) 02/OS/fl
9495 1986(221 09/15/86
9592 1996 (04) 08/14/96
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
MIN iMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN B ! Fe
MIXING LOW AND NIGH ETU WASTES SNAIl BURNING. BLENDING. MANIFESTING
NOTIFICATION BY BURNERS OF USED OIL WNO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIDNS
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESiDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
USED OIL FOR INDUSTRIAL BURNERS
USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH USED OIL AND PROVIDE LI7TLE OR NO ENERGY WHEN BURNED
Burning Nszardoue Waete Fual
t EURNENG AND BLENDING AND INTERIM STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAEARDOUS WASTE
BOILERS MOD INCINERATORS • D iSTINCTION BETSEEN/1NTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING AND BLENDING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND USED OIL FUELS
BURNING COMPRESSOR OIL WITH AMMONIA IN SPACE HEATERS
BURNING OF OFF-SPEC USED OIL
CEMENT EILN BURNING HAEARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TEEATHENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS EN AN INDUSTE 1AL PROCESS
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312 • REGULATION OF
0NGUSTEIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
MAREETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
MINIMUM NEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN BIF B
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REGION V FURL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS WIDER RCRA CONCERNENG CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION FLOAT STORAGE TAME USED TO FEED MATERIAL INTO A PETROLEUM CORER
REGULATORY STATUE OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
REGULATORY STATUS OF TRRAI7IENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL-BLENDING ACTIVITIES
SHAM INCINERATION AND TEEA77-IENT OF KD48-EO52 WASTES IN CEMENT EILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE
SULFUR RECOVERY FUBNACSS ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE -AS-FUEL RULES
TSR REGULATORY STATUS OF SULFUR-CONTAINING SECONDARY MATERIALS WITH A HEATING VALUE GREATER THAN 5.000 RTU/LE
ThO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS
USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (E047( FROM WHICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WNICH IS USED AS A FUEL
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS. INFORMATION REGUIRED
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT EILN. REGULATION OF
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
(See Burning and Btendtng)
BY- PRODUCT
XXEF
/ /
XREF / /
XREF / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 9
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS
(See State Authorization) XREF / /
CAPACITY
(See Siting) XREF / /
CARBON FILTERS
(See Hazardous Waete Identification) XRRF / I
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION
(See Land Disposal Restrictions) XREF / /
CEMENT KILN
(See Incineration) (See also Hazardous Waste Fuels) XREF / /
CEMs
(See Continuous Emissions Monitors) XREF / /
CERCLA (SUPERFUND)
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface) XREF / /
CERCLA/RCRA INTERFACB
(See RCRA/CERCLA Inter! ace( XREF / /
CERTIFICATION
(See also Closure Process, Generators, Post-Closure, Waste Minimization( XREF / /
‘CERTIFICATION FOR CONTAINER STORAGE 9523 1983 (02) 02/01/83
CERTIFICATIOH OF CLOSURE 9476 1987(05) 09/oi/87
qIAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1988(13) 06/01/88
‘LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS - LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9528 1985(03) 09/01/85
‘SOFT HAMMER CERTIFICATIONS/DEMONSTRATIONS 9551 1988(13) 11/01/88
TREATRENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOSING INTERIM STATUS BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH GWM AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REOUIREMENTS 9470 1985(01) 02/01/85
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REOUIREMEHTS FOR ANALYSIS OF 9481 1985 (01) 10/15/85
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFa) 9494 1991(01) 02/04/91
CERTIFICATION PROCESS ON BIOTECHNOLOGICAL METHODS FOR REMBOIATION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 9486 1989(01) 03/30/89
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs 9551 1991(10) 06/05/91
CLARIFICATION OF THE TERM INDEPENDENT . REGISTERED, CERTIFIED ENGINEER 9476 1992(02) 12/21/92
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT 9488 00-lA 05/07/86
DISPOSAL FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CERTIFICATION 9551 1987(07) 03/10/87
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION 9476 1993(02( 06/04/93
INTERPRETATION OF 40 CFR 268 7 REQUIREMENTS 9554 1988(03) 05/13/88
MANIFEST CERTIFICATION SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR EMPLOYEES SIGNING FOR GENERATING COMPANY 9452 1985(02) 10/17/85
MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTR MIHIMIIATIDN CBRTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9452 1986(02) 10/20/86
NKUTRALIZATIDN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETROFITTING VARIANCES 9484 1986(04) 04/21/86
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SHIPPING RESTRICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FACILITY 9S51 1987(20) 10/28/87
POLICIES REGARDING SELF-CERTIFICATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9442 1995(02) 02/07/95
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL) 9522 1986(03) 11/20/86

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 10
XREF / /
9444 1989(091 08/01/89
9441 1986 (741 09/01/86
9592 1994(111 09/01/94
9441 1987 (77a) 09/01/87
9444 1986 108) 05/02/86
9442 1989(04 ) 04/26/89
9443 1994 (05) 07/15/94
9442 1995(04) 05/25/95
9441 1987(14) 03/06/87
9441 1986(37) 05/01/86
9551 1991(11) 09/27/91
9441 1986(26) 04/02/86
9444 1987(33) 08/07/87
9442 1989(05) 07/05/89
9443 1986(16) 07/09/86
9493 1985(03) 11/25/es
9443 1985(09) 10/03/85
9441 1991(05) 04/22/91
9592 1993(05) 09/24/93
9441 1992(26) 08/26/92
9444.1986(29) 12/08/86
9433 1986(01) 01/07/86
9441 1986 (82) 11/08/86
9443 1985(01) 02/21/85
9441 1986(03) 01/07/86
9453 1993(02) 03/23/93
9453 1987(04) 07/14/81
9441 1984(32) 11/07/84
9441 1994(32) 12/23/94
9441 1986(78) 10/12/86
9495 1986(20) 08/22/86
9444 1987(52) 12/11/87
9441 1986(07) 01/23/86
9443 1988(02) 01/13/88
9432 1989(04) 07/20/89
9443 1987(02) 01/14/87
9494 1985(01) 10/01/85
9444 1987(48) 10/23/87
9483 1987(20) 12/15/87
9502 1987(05) 04/02/87
9483 1988(18) 12/12/88
9483 1986(11) 12/19/86
9551 1990)15) 12/20/90
9551.1991)13) 12/20/91
9452 1986101) 04/28/86
XREF / /
XREF / /
QUALIFICATION OF AN ENGINEER FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AS INDEPENDENT WITH RESPECT TO AN ARMY FACILITY
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS HASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
TANI( SYSTEMS APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTION TANKS DURING CLEAI400T, PROCESS TRANSFER EQUIPMENT, AND NOSE LINES
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
CHANGE DURING INTERIM S’IA T HS
(See Interim Status Proceam)
CHANGING FEDERAL REGULATIONS
(See State Authorization)
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE
(See also SH-846, Listed Hazardous Haste, Halardous Waste Identification)
DISCARDED MERCURY THERMOMETERS
HAZARDOUS HASTE LISTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS
USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS HAZARDOUS HASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY’
“HASTE IDENTIFICATION
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION
ANTARCTICA HASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
APPLICABILITY OF HAZARDOUS HASTE CODES 70 A CHEMICAL POLISHING SYSTEM
ARE TANK BOTTOMS REMOVED FROM TANKS CONTAINING ONLY NAPH’IlIA DEEMED TO RE K052 HAZARDOUS HASTE’
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS. REGULATION OP
SY-PROOUCT CRUDE OIL TARE BO’fl’OHS
CALIFORNIA LIST PROHIBITIONS APPLICABILITY AFTER THIRD THIRD RULE
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CAUSTIC RINSING METAL PARTS
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE GB SOLID WASTE TREATHENT MAY CREATE A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REPINING S1TES
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES
CNI,ORIDE- ILMEHITE PROCESS HASTES
CLARIFICATION OF THE USED OIL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HASTE
CLARIFICATION ON SAMPLING AND DATA INTERPRETATION
COIU4ERCIAL C)4W4ICAL PRODUCT P LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO W4USED PRODUCT, NOT USED RESIDUES
DELISTING CRIT8RIA/LEACHATE LEVELS
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
EECAVATED CONSTRUCTION SOIL CONTAINING QUANTITIES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LRACHATE LEVELS
EXPORTING CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS SLUDGE FOR RECLAMATION
OEHERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE
HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTIC - BASIS FOR LISTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF “HICREL MATTE” BY- PRODUCT
HAZARDOUS HASTE LISTING FOR F006 HASTE
HYDRAULIC DEVICES CONTAMINATED WITH OIL DURING QUALITY CONTROL TESTING
KG3S LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATHRNT OF CREOSOTS PRODUCTION WASTEHATERS
LEAKS, SP0LLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED HASTES TO SURFACE HATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
LIQUID SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL SOLUTION PRODUCT, READY SAFE
LIQUID. FREE LIQUID, RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS
LITHIUM BATTERIES
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITH TCDD TEROUGH USE AS AN ANALYTICAL STANDARD

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO 11
MANAGEMENT OF WAST B5 PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MECHANICAL PLAT1NO WASTES IN ThE P006 LISTING. NON-INCLUSION OF
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITH USED OIL (REBUIIABLE PRESUMPTION)
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION. DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASN
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS EY GENERATORS
PACKAGES CONTAINING RESIDUAL URETHANE COATING CHEMICALS
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS. PA1NTS. AND ADHESIVES
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
REGUI.ATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF HASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY STATUS OF PLASTIC CHIPS FROM RECLAMATION OF LEAD-ACID BATtERIES
REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VENADIUM PENTOXIDR REGULATION UNDER RCRA
RELISTING HAZARDOUS WAETR
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE • I 0 NUMBERS FOR
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL. REGULATION OF LIQUID
SCRAP GRNP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DRNP. DISPOSAL. REQUIREMENTS FOR
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY
SOLAR CELL AND NIGH TECH INDUSTRI KS HAZARDOUS WASTE
SPENT ANTI-FREEZE COOLAIJT REGULATORY STATUS
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS
TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UIEG X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RRCLAJ4ATION
WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANR FOAM
WASTE SOLVENT- EASED GLUE
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE. DISPOSAL OF
Aqueous Waste
“AQUROUS” AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTRRISTIC
‘ALCOHOL-CONTENT EXCLUSION FOR THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
‘AQUEOUS WASTE AS IGNITABLE
‘POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
AQUEOUS SOLUTION. IONITASILITY DEFINED
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED TO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES
HANDLING AND ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES CONTAINING VOC S
IONITABILITY OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION
INTERPRETATION OF AQUEOUS AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE OR COEROSIVS WASTES
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUB TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL OASIFICATIDN ASN)
5OLVETT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAI4S FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS
WATER/METHANOL MIXTURE WASTESTESAM
Blasting Caps
BLASTING CAPS AS REACTIVE WASTES
CGrrosiVs Wastes
‘AQUEOUS’ AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
‘LAND DISPOSAL RRSTEICTIOHS - CORROSIVE WASTE
‘POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
AQUEOUS AS USED I I I THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
BATIERI ES • SCRAP METAL. AND PRECIOUS METALS
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
9441 1986(73)
9444 1986(13)
9495 1986 (04)
9441 1987(06)
9441 1985(38)
9443 1987(06)
9441 1986(21)
9443 1987)09)
9441 1987)09)
9444 1987 (49)
9441 1985(39)
9441 1992 (36)
9441 1993(13)
9444 1986(17)
9442 1986(08)
9441 1986(051
9443 1987(18)
9441 1985(23)
9441 1987(02)
9444 19E3(03)
9441 1990(25)
9443 1987(11)
9441 1986(44)
9441 1986(42)
9441 1992(24)
9443 1989(02)
9442 1986)07)
9441 1986)11)
19/25/86
06/24/86
12/28/86
O 1/27/87
11/20/85
04/08/87
53/13/E6
05/13/87
02/19/8 !
10/26/87
11/25/85
10/28/92
88/04/9 3
09/04/8 6
08 /2 1/8 6
01/16/86
08/19/87
06/27/ES
01/06/87
7/20/8 3
08/24/90
06 /08/87
10/27/Ba
05/20/86
0 8/17/92
04/12/89
07/02/86
02/11/ 86
9443 1992(05) 09/01/92
9443 1992(03 1 07/01/92
9443 1984 (06) 08/01/84
9441 1985(09) 02/01/85
9443 1887(19) 09/14/87
9443 1985 (02) 02/26/85
9443 1987(17) 08/18/87
9442 1991(15) 12/17/91
9432 1990(01) 02/16/90
9443 1993(05) 04/23/93
9441 1989(91) 10/05/89
9441 1986)31) 04/21/86
9441 1988(49) 12/06/88
9442 1987(02) 07/24/87
9443 198S(07) 09/10/85
9443 1984 (05) 09/11/84
9443 1992(05) 09/01/92
9551 1987(19) 09/01/b7
9441 1985(09) 02/01/85
9443 1987(19) 09/14/87
9443 1985(44) 12/18/85
9443 1986(04) 01/22/86
9493 1986(01) 01/22/86

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 12
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED TO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES 9443 1907(17) 00/10/07
CORROSIVE SOLIDS , COMMERCIAL CNEIIICAL PRODUCTS, REACTIVE WASTES DEFINED 9443 1904(09) 11/29/04
CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPLIES TO SOLIDS 1992 (61) 03/09/92
DEFINITION OF A LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE AND CORROSIVE WASTES I999(OOa) 10/05/09
DEIONIZATION ACID 9443 1906(11) 05/12/06
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE 1990(07) 12/21/90
FOOD PROCESSORS, IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS ON 1900(02) 09/16/00
INTERPRETATION OF AQUEOUS’ AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITV CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1993(OS) 04/23/93
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR A HAZARDOUS CORROSIVE WASTEWATER 9551 1997 (04) 05/01/97
NITRIC ACID WASTE CHARACTERIZATION 9443 1909(09) 11/17/09
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUAJITITY GENERATOR 9441 1906)47) 06/02/06
PRECIPITATION WNICN IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT W1TN EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH) 9441 1906(31) 04/21/06
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCNANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION 9 3 1905(06) 10/29/05
REGENERATION OF USED BAtTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION 9441 1906(51) 07/02/fl
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT 9441 1906(49) 06/16/06
REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BA t TERY RECYCLING 9497 1906(01) 02/06/06
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR CORROSIVITY 1900(05) 0S/02/00
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. REUSE OF 9441 1907(17) 01/31/07
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER 9493 1905(02) 11/14/05
TREAI74ENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATHENT nan- 9441 1906(62) 00/19/06
USE OF PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETERMINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE 9445 1993 (04) 04/19/93
Dilution
‘DILUTION OF F003 WASTES 9441 1906(97) 12/01/06
‘DILUTION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTED WASTE 9S51 1900(02) 05/01/00
‘DILUTION TO MEET TREATMENT STANDARDS 9554 1906(05) 12/01/06
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 40 CFR 260 DEBRIS REGULATIONS 9551 1994 (01) 10/06/94
DECANNING AND CRUSHING OPERATIONS 9432 1904(03) 04126/04
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAJ4 DILUTION 9551 1990(06) 10/14/90
PESTICIDES CONTAINING A 261 33(e) COMPOUND AS A SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT 9444 1901 (05) 09/30/01
RCRA POLICY STATEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS’ DILUTION PROHIBITION AND COMBUSTION OF INORGANIC METAL-BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTES 9551 01-01 0S/21/94
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES AIID THE DILUTION PROHIBITION 9551 1907(23) 11/13/07
SOLVENT AND COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE 9444 1909(03) 06/20/09
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-14 03/lq/06
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 9441 1906(62) 00/19/06
EP ToXicity
‘EP TOXICITY FOR OILY WASTES 9443 1905(00) 09/01/05
‘EP TOXICITY TEST ON OILY WASTES 1904(04) 07/01/04
LANDFILLS WITH EP TOXIC LEACHATE, RSGUI.ATION OF 9407 1904(04) 00/01/04
‘LDR REQUIRD4E)ry5 DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE 9551 1990(16) 12/01/90
ALLOWABLE MOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES 9445 1907 (04) 12/04/07
ANALYSIS OF FLUFF MATERIALS 9442 1991(02) 01/22/91
ANALYTES TO LOOK FOR WHEN PERFORMING ECU ANALYSIS 9442 1909(03) 04/20109
ANALYTICAL METNDDS/RP TOXICITY TEST/REFERENCE ETOS 9445 1904(021 04/23(04
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZATION EVALUATION OF THE WASTE EVALUATION TEST 9442 1900 (03) 05/02/00
CARSDN REGENXRATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS 9409 1991 (04) 00/02/91
CNROM)1144 WASTES TRIVALENT AND HEXAVALENT, CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES 9441 1906 124) 03/21/06
CRUSHING WASTE PRIOR TO EP TEST 1407(26) 11/12/07
PELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS. CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES, STEEL IWDUETRY 9433 1904 (06) 12/10/04
DETECTION LIMIT FOR EP-LEACHATE CONCENTRATION OF SELENIUM 9443 1906(06) 03/12/BE
EP TOXICITY LEVEL FOR BARIUM IN DRINKING WATER 9443 1999(03) 04/20/fl
EF TDXICITY TEST EXTRACTION MEDIUM, REQUESTED CRANGE IN 9443j905(19) 10/21/05
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE TOXICITY TEST 9443 1991 (01) 06/17/01
FGO6 WASTES, VNS AND GROUNDWATER MON1TORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELIETING PETITION FOR 9433 1907(09) 06/00/07
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION 9441 1909(10) 03/27/99
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES 9442 1909(02) 01/25/99

-------
07/06 198
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 13
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING)
FLUORESCENT AND MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS AND CLASSIFICATION USING THE EP TOXICITY TEST
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS
LEACH TESTING PROCEDURE TO REMOVE LEAD-CONTAMINATED SO I LB FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS
LEAD AND ARSENIC WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
METHODS 1310 AND 1330 EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION. DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASH
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
PAINT FILTER WASTE
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAEARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
REGENERATION OF USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS
RESIDUES FROM U B NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
SILVER IN WASTES AND IN SEWER DISCHARGES FROM THE PHOTO-FINISHING INDUSTRY
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
i’C RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS
TOTAL CONCENTRATION USED TO DEMONSTRATE A WASTE DOES HOT EXHIBIT THE CHARACTERISTIC OF EP TOXICITY
TOTAL COHSTITUENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS CHA IACTER ISTICS OF WASTE SAMPLE
USE OF THE METHOD OF STANDARD EDITIONS
WASTE BATTERIES AND CELLS
Explosive Wastes
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCIHERATIOH OF K045
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUHITIOH OF 0 50 CALIBER
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U S ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES
DISCARDED CLASS C EXPLOSIVES
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEH THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
EMERGENCY PERMITS FOR DETONATION OF EXPLOSIVE WASTE
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS
LEAKING OR DAMAGED EXPLOSIVES
REACTIVE WASTE - EXPLOSIVITY
REGULATORY ISSUES PERTAINING TO WASTES CONTAMINATED WITH EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES
RESPONSE TO PROPOSED PROCEDURE TO DECOMMISSION ALUMINUM CHAFF ROVING BUNDLES
Ignitab ility
ALCOHOL-COHTEHT EXCLUSION FOR THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
AQUEOUS WASTE AS IGNITABLE
fl1ATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGHITABILITY DEFINED
ASYM 04992-89 (METHOD B) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGHITABILII’Y
CHARACTERISTIC OF IGHITABILITY
CHARACTERIZATIOH OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
CLARIFICATION OF THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGHITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS
CLARIFICATION OH MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER, F003, FOOS, 0001, WASTE DESTIHED FOR RECYCLING, AND TEEA’I7IEHT STANDARDS FOR CFC
DBO1 CHARACTERISTIC WASTES - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
DEFINING IGNITABLE LIQUIDS METHOD
DEFINITION OF A LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE AND CORROSIVE WASTES
DETREMIHATIOH OF THE IGHITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
9441 1988(48)
9443 19B6(09)
9451 1986(03)
9431 1989(01)
9554 1990(11)
9443 1987(28)
9443 1986(18)
9443 1987(14)
9443 1986(13)
9443 1987(06)
9553 1987(15)
9444 1982(01)
9444 1987(17)
9441 1985(39)
9441 1986(01)
9441 1986(51)
9441 1993(15)
9441 1987(16)
9443 1986(15)
9443 1987 (01)
9493 1985(02)
9441 1991(15)
9443 1987(11)
9443 1989(01)
9443 1987(33)
9443 1987(12)
9443 1983(05)
11/21/88
04/30/86
04/28/86
06/26/89
08/24/90
11/20/87
09/04/86
08/11/87
05/27/86
04/08/87
12/03/57
09/15/82
05/20/87
11/25/85
01/06/86
07/02/86
09/14 /9 3
03/17/87
06/26/86
01/06/87
11/14/85
09/25/9 1
06/08/87
01/27/89
12/31/87
06/23/87
07/27/83
9441 1987(12) 03/03/87
9443 1994 (06) 11/03/94
9502 1986(09) 05/08/86
9441 1987(03) 01/07/87
9443 1987(30) 11/30/87
9443 1988 (07) 06/02/88
9441 1985(31) 10/03/85
9527 1986(01) 01/05/86
9527 1988(03) 08/11/88
9471 1988(05) 11/30/88
9443 1988(10) 09/13/88
9443 1995(01) 02/24/95
9444 1994 (02) 01/26/94
9443 1992(03) 07/01/92
9443 1984(06) 08/01/84
9443 1987(23) 10/01/87
9443 1985(02) 02/26/85
9443 1992(04) 08/26/92
9443 1987(07) 04/16/87
9442 1995(01) 01/26/95
9443 1995(03) 09/19/95
9441 1994(26) 09/28/94
9554 1990(02) 02/22/90
9442 1991 (05) 03/27/91
9443 1989(086) 10/05/89
9443 1991(01) 09/06/91

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD iNDEX Page No 14
FOO l 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS 9414 1987(30) 07/21/07
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR 9489.19e7 1o2) 07/22/07
HOW DO IGNITABLE SOLIDS, INCLUDING SOLVRJ1T CONTAMINATED RAGS OR TOWELS, FIT INTO THE 0001 CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY 9443 1997(02) 05/22/97
IGNITASILITY CHARACTERISTIC TESTING FOR SOLIDS 9443 1990(01) 01/30/90
IGNITASILITY CHARACTERISTIC. DEFINITION OP UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE 9443 1900(06) c o/ o s/ Os
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC, DEFINITION OF UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE 9443 1900108) 09/09/80
IGNITABLE SOLID DEFINITION APPLIED TO TITANIUM SWARF 9443.1903 101) 01/10/03
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES 9444 1900(02) 01/20/00
MIXTURE OF METHANOL AND SOLID WASTE WHICH DOSS NOT EXHIBIT ANY CHARACTERISTICS 9441 1986(23) 03/21/OS
SOLVENT-CONTAJ4INAYED WASTEWATER FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE 9442 1907(06) 10/26/07
THE DIFFERENCE BENEEN THE DEFINITION FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITASILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS 9443 1995(02) 08/24/95
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9551 1990(15) 12/20/90
TNIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE 9551 1991113) 12/20/91
TOLUEBS-LADEN FILTER RESIDUE GENERATED PROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS 9444 1905109) 06/03/05
WATER/PIETHA IIOL MIXTURE WASTESTRW4 9443 1905 (07) 09/10/05
Lead
‘APPLICABILITY OF K052 WASTE CODE TO PIPELINE TERMINALS 9444 1997(01) OS/E1/97
‘LEAD USED AS SHIELDING IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL 9441 1992(12) 05/01/92
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES 9442 1909(09) 11/03/89
CLEANUP LEVELS FOE LEAD AND CADMIUM IN SOILS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 9476 1900(026) 03/02/80
EPA’S DETERMINATION ON WHETHER MACROENCAPSULATION PROCESS ADDRESSES THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR SECTION 260 45, TA0LE 1 9554 1995(02) 09/19/95
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING) 0441 1900 (40) 11/21/00
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES 9502 1990(01) 05/07/90
LEACHING TESTE FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD 0443 1907(24) 11/05/07
LEAD CONTAJ4INATION RESULTING FROM SKEET SHOOTING 9444 1993(04) 89/23/93
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE 9442 1991112) 00/30/91
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS 9443 1907(20) 11/20/07
LEAD-BEARING WASTES TREATHENT STANOARDS 9554 1990(06) 06/25/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL. OK 9551 1990(12) 11/00/90
ON-SITE TREATHENT OP MANHOLE SEDIMENT WHICH MAY RXCRED TNR TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD 9553 1094 (011 06/23/94
PROCESSING LEAD ABATEMENT DEBRIS TO MEET HAEARDOUS WASTE RECYCLER’S SPECIFICATIONS 1S NOT ‘TEKAIlIENT AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260 10 9432 8994(03) 10/07/94
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES 1991(03) 12/10/91
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS 9441 1986(01 1 01/06/86
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES 9444 1980(14) 00/26/88
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 9502 1969(02) 05/25/09
STATUS OF WASTES GENERATED FROM ABATEMENT OF LEAD-BASED PAINT 9443 1994(03) 05/24/94
TCLP AND LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS 9442 1991(10) 07/03/91
TREATHENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD 9441 1907 (52) 06/26/87
TEEATHENT OF AN INHERENTLY HAIAR000S DEBRIS THAT EXHIBITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD AND CADMIUM 95S4 1993(02) 11/18/93
USED OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPINO 9441 1986140) 07/31/86
Reactive W 6B L CB
‘SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTAINING WASTEWATRR WHICH BECOMES REACTIVE WHEN DRY 9443 1983 (02) 01/01/83
AEROSOL PAINT AND SOLVENT CANS DEMONSTRAT1ON OF REACTIVITY 9441 1987(77) 09/30/87
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED PROM INCINERATION OP X045 9441 1987(12) 03/03/87
AVAII.ABILITY OF CRITERIA USED TO EVALUATE THE CHARACTERISTIC OP REACTIVITY 9443 1993 (03) 03/03/93
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS 9441 1905 (44) 12/18/85
BLASTING CAPS AS REACTIVE WASTES 9443 1904(05) 09/11/84
CHEMICAL AGENTS GB, VE, AND HN AT MUNITIONS DISPOSAL FACILITY 9443 1904(03) 06/04/84
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED A}O4UNITION OF 0 50 CALIBER 9443 1994(06) 11/03/94
CLARIFICATION ON THE LEVEL OF SULFIDE FOR DETERMINING IF A WASTE IS HAEARDOUS UNDER THE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1993(07) 11/00/93
CORROSIVE SOLIDS, Cm(MERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCTS, REACTIVE WASTES DEFINED 9443 1984(09) 11/29/84
CYANIDE-SALT CONTAINING WASTES IN METAL HEAT TREATING OPERATIONS 9444 1984(01) 03/05/84
DEFINITION OP THE CHARACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY AS IT PERTAINS TO AEROSOL CANE 0443 1997 (01) 05/19/97
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES 9443 1987(30) 11/30/87
DISCARDED CLASS C EXPLOSIVES 9443 1988 107) 06/02/88

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 15
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY m i 9441 1985(31) 10/03/85
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1987(31) 12/07/al
POPPING FURNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATED ORDNANCE BY INCINERATION - METALS RECOVERY 9441 1983 (04) 06/08/83
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS 9442 1993(04) 11/22/93
REACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DISCHARGED Li/502 BArrERIRS 9443 1987(05) 03/18/87
REACTIVE WASTE - BXPLOSIVITY 9443 1988(10) 09/13/88
REGULATORY ISSUES PERTAINING TO WASTES CONTAMINATED WITH EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 9443 1995 (01) 02/24/95
SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION REACTIVITY, OFF SPECIFICATION 9443 1984(10) 11/30/84
SPENT IRON SPONGE REGULATION AND TREATMENT 9443 1986(02) 01/17/86
SULFIDE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1985)04) 07/16/85
TCLP
FILTERS USED TO RECLAIM CFC REFRIGERANT 9441 1992(32) 09/01/92
•MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE 1993(02) 02/01/93
PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TC UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL 9441 1990(31) 10/01/90
•REMOVAL OF it WASTE FROM A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9443 1991 (02) 11/01/91
•USE OF TOTAL WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATIONS 9445 1994 (01) 01/01/94
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS 9441 1986(54) 07/15/86
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE it RULE 9442 1991(17) 10/01/91
APPROPRIATENESS OF THE EP/TCLP SIMULATION OF CO-DISPOSAL SITUATION FOR MINING WASTES 9571 1985(01) 10/03/85
BIAS CORRECTION APPLIED TO THE TCLP 9442 1990(02) 11/08/90
CCA TREATED WOOD WHEN DISPOSED 9441 1991(11) 06/28/91
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES 9443 1985(09) 10/03/85
DIGESTION OF EP AND TCLP EXTRACTS PRIOR TO METAL ANALYSIS 9443 1989(10) 12/13/89
DILUTION OF TEST SAMPLING 9442 1991(04) 03/25/91
ELECTRIC UTILITY POLES 9441 1990(21) 07/19/90
EP TOXICITY TEST EXTRACTION MEDIUM, REGUESTED CHANGE IN 9443 1985(10) 10/21/85
EXEMPTION FROM PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION STEP IN TCLP 9442 1991(13) 10/09/91
GENERATOR USE OP TOTAL CONSTITUEIIT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS 9451 1986(03) 04/28/86
GLASS FIBER FILTERS FOR USE IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP) 9443 1986(19) 09/30/86
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES 9443 1993(01) 01/18/93
INTERPRETATION OF HOW THE RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO WASTE FROM THE REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM SURFACES 9441 1997(02) 03/12/97
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLPI 9443 1986(17) 09/03/86
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED TO RUN THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP) 9443 1986(10) 05/05/86
LEACH TESTING PROCEDURE TO REMOVE LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS 9431 1989 (01) 06/26/89
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD 9443 1987(24) 11/OS/87
LEAD AND ARSENIC WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS 9554 1990(11) 08/24/90
LEADED PAINT SANDBLASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP 9442 1991(01) 01/08/91
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED it WASTES 9528 1990)02) 07/11/90
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991 (05) 10/11/91
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991(04) 10/11/91
MATRIX SPIKE IN itLP PROCEDURE 9442 1991(03) 03/19/91
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING 9442 1991(11) 07/09/91
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS 9528 1991(02) 02/27/91
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION 9441 1991(01) 01/03/91
PETROLEUM REFININO WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WIDe 9483 1990(03) 09/20/90
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE DGWDW AND OSW 9521 1991 (01) 08/27/91
QC REVIEW OF PERMIT DATA 9442 1990(04) 11/01/90
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS 9442 1993(04) 11/22/93
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS 9441 1992(22) 07/21/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF CNOPLINE RESIDUE 9441 1996(10) 11/07/96
REINJECTION OF GROUNDWATER DURING AUTHORIZED CLEANUP ACTIVITIES 9522 1993(01) 03/04/93
REVISIONS TO THE itLP 9443 1993(04) 04/02/93
SHELL OIL FACILITY - it COMPLIANCE 9431 1991(02) 05/09/91
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEWLY REGULATED DUE TO it RULE 9484 1991 (01) 03/08/91
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE 9441 1991(02) 02/12/91
it RULE - IMPLEMENTATION 9441 1990(29) 10/01/90

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 16
it RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
it RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL
TCL.P EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES. OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE
TCLP IN NE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTI FICATION PROGRAM
TCLP PARTICLE SIER REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
USE OP PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION
USED OIL FILTERS REGULATORY DETERMINATION
WASTE MANAOEMENT OPTIONE FOR ZINC-CARBON BA DFERIES
Toxicity
•USE OP TOTAL WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATIONS
INTERPRETATION DF NDW THE RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO WASTE FROM THE REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM SURFACES
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUlLS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT ANTIFREEZE
CHARACTER ISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
Lead
•TRKATHENT STANDARDS FOR DOlE RADIOACTIVE LEAD TANKS AND CONTAINERS
CHEMICAL DEODORANTS
(See Nazardoua Waete Identification)
CNENICAL STABILIZATION
(See Treatment)
CHLORINATION TANK
(See Liated Nazacdoue Waate)
CHROMIUM
(See Exclueiona)
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT
(See Enforcement) (See a leo C rap1sance)
CLEAN AIR ACT
(See a leo Incineration. Deed Oil. TSDFa)
SIP REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER
GASEOUS EMISSIONS PROM LANDPI LAS
INCINERATORS THAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS. RCRA EXCLUSION. CAR APPLIES
RESIDUES PROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
CLEAN CLOSURE
(See Cloeure Proceee)
9441 1991(121
9451 1991(031
9442 1991(141
9442 1991(08 1
9443 1987(29 1
9442 1991(161
9521 1991(021
9493 1991(02)
9442 1991(18)
9441 1990(30)
9442 1990(05)
9441 1993 (09)
9445 1994 (01)
9441 1997(02)
9442 1993(04)
9441 1994(01)
9554 1997(05)
IREF
REEF
XREF
07/31/91
04/16/91
10/29/91
06/13/91
11/18/87
05/01 /9 1
08/30/91
06/20/91
12/19/91
10/30/90
10/30/90
05/06 / 9 3
01/01/94
93/12/97
11/22/93
01/21/ 94
04/01/97
/1
/ /
/ /
XREF / /
ZREF / /
ZREF / /
9488 1991 (03) 09/23/91
9481 1986(03) 03/06/86
9441 1984(15) 07/31/84
9487 1984 (08) 05/21/86
IREF / /

-------
07106/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 17
CLEAN WATER ACT
(See a leo Exclueione) XREF I /
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREA1T4ENT (DST) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI) TREATARILITY GROUP 9554 1994(06) 10 /24/94
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS 9444 1986 )07) 04/07/86
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(28) 04/07/86
NPDES Faci litiee
LEAKS. SPILLS. AND ILLEGAL DISCNARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS. MIXTURE RULE APPLIED ro 9441 1986(07) 01/23/86
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTSWATSR TREATHENT SYSTEM 9471 1989(01) 03/20/89
WASTEWATER TREATHENT UNIT EXEMPTION 9431 1989(02) 09/26/89
WaeteWater
BDAT FOR WASTSWATER 9432 1986(16) 12/01/86
MIXTURE RULE - DISCHARGES TO WASTEWATER 9522 1987(02) 12/01/87
ZERO DISCHARGE AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RCRA EXCLUSION. CWA APPLIES 9441 1984(14) 05/01/84
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES 9442 1989(04) 04/26/89
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY. MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGDN) 9441 1986(33) 04/23/86
CLARIFICATION OF RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO WASTSWATER TREATHENT ACTIVITIES 9592 1994(02) 03/22/94
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS 9441 1987(96) 12/10/87
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING 9433 1987(10) 06/12/87
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE 9441 1995(05) 02/17/95
LAND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS 9453 1987(09) 12/10/87
REACTOR VESSEL WASNOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT 9444 1987(49) 10/26/87
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATHENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9433 1986(11) 04/24/86
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS VIS-A-VIS NPDES-PERMITTED DISCHARGE POINTS 9484 1986(09) 12/29/86
WASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING 9444 1986(23) 10/21/86
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENR CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER 9441 1986(52) 07/02/86
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE 9444 1987(39) 09/02/87
CLEANUP STANDARDS
(See Corrective Action) XREF / /
CLOSURE
(See Interim Statue Proceee) XRSF / /
CLOSURS PLAN
(See Closure Proceee) XRSF / /
CLOSURE PROCESS
(See a leo Interim Statue Proceee, Post-Closure, TSDFe( XREF / /
CLOSURS OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9484 1987(04) 04/01/87
•CORRECTIVS ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT 9502 1986(10) OS/01/86
‘LEASING OF PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSURE 9528 1983(03) 09/01/83
‘MIXED RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DISPOSAL OF 9431 1988 (02) 01/01/88
‘PERSONNEL TRAINING DURING POST-CLOSURE 9523 1985(05) 10/01/85
‘TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF USTs 9483 1989(05) 10/01/89
3008(h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES. USE OF 9502 00-7 03/08/88
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 9476 00-12 02/02/88
DELAY OF CLOSURE PERIOD FOR HWM FACILITIES 9476 1989(01) 05/16/89
DRLAY OF CLOSURE RULE PREAMBLE LANGUAGE, CORRECTION 9476 1989(02) 08/22/89
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS - CERTIFYING CLOSURE 9477 1990(02) 05/28/90
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE 9476 1985 (02) 08/27/85

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 18
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGXIED RULES 9476 1985(05) 12/13/65
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCD STEEL) 9522 19861031 11/20/86
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 9478.1985 104) 09/25/85
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES 9501 1987102) 12/14/87
RD6D PERMITS - POLICY GUIDAJICE 9503.50-lA 12/23/85
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9502 1987 (05) 04/02/87
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANC h PERMITTING COMMRNTS 9523 00-17 09/02/88
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-12 03/30)87
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/86
SURFACE IMPOUNDIIENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE 9484 00-Se 10/15/88
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES . CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(28) 04/07/86
Clean Closure
CLEAN CLOSURE 9476 1987 (031 06/01/87
‘CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE 9522 1988 (01) 02/02/88
CLEAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OF AN INCINERATOR 9488 1987(04) 06/12/87
CLEANUP LEVELS FOR LEAD AND CADMIUM IN SOILS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 9476 1988 (S2a) 03/02188
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476 1987(08) 12/17/87
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS 9476 00-18 05/12/89
EFFECTIVE DATES FOR CHARACTERISTIC & LISTED WASTES PEE 03/19/87 CLEAN CLOSURE REGULATION 9476 00-16 04/01/88
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT CLEAN CLOSING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 6 WASTE PILE UNITS 9476 00-14 03/31/88
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF OEJECTION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES, INC 9476 1990 (01) 06/04/90
SOIL EACEGROUND LEVELS AS CLEAN CLOSURE STANDARDS. USE OF 9476 1985(03e) 05/27/88
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 8512 1989(02) 05/25/89
Closure Plan
‘CLOSURE PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9476.1987(07) 11/01/87
CLOSURE PLANS - APPEALS - 9476 1986(01 .) 08/01/86
‘CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOE TANKS 9483 1987 (08) 05/01/87
POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOE HAEARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9476 1988(03) 04/01/88
CALL-IN OF STORAGE AND TREATHENT APPLICATIONS 9528 1988(06) 04/19/88
CLARIFICATION OF THE CLOSURE REQUIRE)IERrS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 9476 1993 (01) 05/28/93
CLOSURE PLAN COMMENTS/ISSUES (CRUCIELE STEEL) 9476 1984 (05) 09/18/84
CLOSURE P1.AN FOE THE NAEARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC’S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PI NT 9488 1987(011 02/09/87
DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED DELAY OF CLOSURE REGULATION, GUIDANCE 9478 1988(04) 09/31/88
DSLISTING PETITION-STEEL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN 9433 1986(07) 03/18/86
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION 9476 1993(02) 06/04/93
PERI4ITFING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT NAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS 9528 1986(11) 12/10186
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS 9523 00-18 03/14/89
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9S23 00-15 03/30/88
Closure Requirements
ANNUAL PAYMENTS INTO A STANDBY TRUST FUND WHEN USING A LETTER OF CREDIT 9477 1996 (03) 12/01/86
‘CERTIFICATION OP CLOSURE 9476 1987(OS) 09/01/87
CDNVERSIDN OF PERMITTED OR INTERIM STATUS UNITS TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS 9525 1996(01) 01/01/96
‘DELAY OF CLOSURE 9476 1997(01) 02/01/97
‘DELAY OF CLOSURE FOR NON-RETROFITTED HAEAEDOUS WASTE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTINUING TO RECEIVE NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9484 1996(01) 06/01/96
‘ESTIMATED CLOSURE DATES IN PART E PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9523 1984 (03) 04/01/84
FIEANCIAL REQUIREMENTS/CLOSURE COSTS 9477 1986(11) 06/01/86
GENERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1989(01) 04/01/89
HASARDOUS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE 9476.1986(02) 09/01/86
‘RETROFITTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476 1986 (04) 10/01/86
CLARIFICATION OF THE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 9476 1993 (01) 05/28/93
CLOSURE & POET-CLOSURE EEOUIREMENTE REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATHENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9476 1983 (02) 01/11/83
CLOSURE AFTER CESSATION OF RECEIPT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9476 1986 (03) 10/08/86
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES 1983(03) 12/09/83
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS 9477 1984(01) 01/12 B4

-------
07/06 /98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 19
CLOSURE ISSUES RELATED TO WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS 9476 1984(04) 08/07/84
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMEWr THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS 9484 1986(02) 04/02/86
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DELISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED 9476 1988(01) 01/29/88
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF STORAGE TANKS 9483 1987(03) 04/08/87
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS 9476 1991 (01) 05/02/91
CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE REGULATIONS/PARTIAL CLOSURE (EMELLE.AL) 9476 1906 (01) 05/09/86
RSTIMATED CLOSURE DATES IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9523 1984(01) 01/17/84
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REGULATIONS RELATED TO BANKRUPTCY (LW) 9477 1986(12) 07/23/86
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87 9522 1988(05) 11/30/88
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS 9484 1986(03) 04/09/86
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005( 1) OF RCRA TO 9476 1987 (01) 06/09/97
TEMPORARY PERIOD AND HOLDING DEFINED 9522 1996(01) 09/01/96
Closure Standards
•CONVERSION OF PERMITI’ED OR INTERIM STATUS UNITS TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS 952S 1996(01) 01/01/96
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDP3 9476 00-13 02/08/88
FACILITY TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS 1986(01) 01/03/86
POST-CLOSURE PERMIDI’ING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 9521 1485 (01) 09/2S/85
Partial Closure
•AMENDING CLOSURE PLANS TO ADDRESS PARTIAL CLOSURE 9476 1995(01) 06/01/85
TANK REPLACEMENT 9477 1998(03) 07/01/98
Pensitting
AMENDING CLOSURE PLANS TO ADDRESS PARTIAL CLOSURE 9476 1985(01) 06/01/8S
•INTERIM STATUS CLOSURE CERTIFICATION 9476 1984(03) 03/01/84
PRBNI’fl’ING UNITE CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE 9476 1985(03) 09/11/95
Public Participation
CLOSURE PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9476 1987(07) 11/01/87
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN APPROVAL 9476 1989(03) 09/07/89
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
(See Closure Process) XREF / /
CLOSURE STANDARDS
(See Closure Process) XREF / /
COAL
(See Mining Waste) KEEP / /
COAL TAR/COKE
(See also Hazardous Waste Fuels) XREF / /
•COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 9441 1989(04) 02/01/89
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1987(75) 09/04/87
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1987(98) 12/24/87
REGULATORY STATUS OF CENTRIFUDE UNDERFLOW WASTES 9444 1993(02( 04/20/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF COAL TAR DISTILLATES 9441 1992(20) 07/09/92
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED 9441 1986(09) 01/24/96
WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS 9442 1997 (02) 07/24/87

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 20
(See also Enforcement. Interim Statue Process)
GROUNOWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PERIOO/PO5T-CLOSURE CARE PERIOD
RCRA COMPLIANCE ORDERS
EPA AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PERMIT APPLICANT HISTORY OP COMPLIANCE WITH RCRA
GUIDANCE ON WHETHER GENERATORS MUST POST •(() SMOKING’ SIGNS WHEW A FACILITY HAS A ‘TOBACCO-FREE’ POLICY
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT ISSUES (EEC K)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS • THERMEI( ENERGY/RADIAN
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING, DEFINITION
Inspect ions
• INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
flJABORATORY AUDIT INSPECTZON
RCRA INSPECTIONS
INSPECTION AUTHORITY WIDER SECTION 1007 OP RCRA
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
(See also Corrective Action . Enforcement, State Authorization)
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES IN RCRA PERMITS
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
INSTALLATION RESTOEATION PROGRAM (IRPI - DOD
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRPI DOD
COMPRESSED GAS CYLINDERS
(See Hazardous Waste Identif [ cation)
CONDITIONALLY IEMFT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
(See Generators)
CONSTRUCTION
/ 1
09/19/95
oi/2l/Ee
03/30/87
07/29/87
XREF / /
9528 1987(041 03/01/87
COLLECTION PROGRAMS
(See Household Hazardous Waste)
COMMERCIAL C)(W4ICAL PRODUCTS
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
COMPATIBILITY
(See also Containers, Ltnere, Minimum Technology Requirements, Tank Syetee)
SULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIELE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS
SWII4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TRAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TRD INDICATING THAT ETHANOL AND STAINLESS STEEL ARE CU4PATI BLE
COMPLIANCE
/ /
/ /
XREF
XREF
XREF
9461 1985)01)
9482 1988 (01)
9523 00-12
9483 1987(12)
XREF / /
9481 1988(03) 04/01/88
9523 19Dec03) 08/01/86
9523 1991(01) 03/13/91
9472 1995(01) 06/08/95
9522 00-3 11/13/87
9521 1987 (01) 08/07/87
9481 1985(04) 10/30/85
09/01/87
07 /01/87
0 5/01/ OS
04 /17/86
9483 1987 (06)
9431 1987103)
9504 1955(01)
9504 1986(02)
IREF
/ /
XREF / /
9524 1984 (01) 10/05/84
9502 1986)04) 12/13/86
9502 1986(20) 12/08/86
9502 1986(20) 12/08/86
XREF / /
XREF / /
(See also Interim Status Process)
‘CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUE - RECONSTRUCTION LIMIT WHERE SOME UNITS NAVE CLOSED

-------
07 106/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 21
“CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS WHERE ORIGINAL UNITS ARE CLOSED 9528 1987(03) 03/01/87
“GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION 9481 1985(05 ) 10/01/85
“PERMIT MODIFICATION 9525 1985(01) 10/01/85
“RCRA PERMITS FOR MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS 9523 1986(01) 03/01/86
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INCINERATOR WITH THE CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS 9528 1986(07) 09/19/86
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION 9488 1986(05) 04/24/86
IN-EXISTENCE AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION-DEFINITIONS 9432 1989 (02) 05/16/89
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS 9444 1986(28) 12/05/86
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-15 03/30/88
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-12 03/30/87
New Unit
BIF RULE APPLIED TO NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9528 1991 (01) 08/07/91
EXISTING UNITS UNDER NSWA-APPLICABILITY OF M it TO EXPANSIONS 9432 1985(04) 08/30/85
INTERIM STATUS OF PROPOSED LANDFILL CELLS 9487 1981(01) 03/12/81
PERMITTING UNITE CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE 9476 1985(03) 09/11/85
CONTAINED- IN
XREF / /
“GROUNDWATER ‘CONTAINED IN” POLICY 9441 1990 113b) 05/01/90
“HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9441 1990(13c) 05/01/90
CLARIFICATION OF THE “MIXTURE RULES” THE “CONTAINED-IN” POLICY. LOB ISSUES. AND “POINT OF GENERATION” FOR U096 9551 1996(01) 02/27/96
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA “CONTAINED-IN” POLICY 9441 1995(32) 09/15/95
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1989(30) 06/19/89
EPAS CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES 9444 1995 (01) 02/17/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOILS CONTAMINATED FROM RELEASES OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9441 1992(34) 10/15/92
CONTAINERS
XREF / /
“ADDING ARSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS 9453 1990(02) 07/01/90
“HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS/CONTAINERS - CAPACITY OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1988(14) 06/01/88
“LAB PACES AT GENERATOR SITES 9453 1988(02) 01/01/88
“LEAD USED AS SHIELDING IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL 9441 1992(12) 05/01/92
“RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS 9453 1986(05) 08/01/86
ABSORBENTS FOR CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES. USE OF 9487 1985(05) 09/20/85
ACCUMULATION AND TREAThENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 9453 1986(01) 04/16/86
APPLICABILITY OF A PROPOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION TO CERTAIN DOE RADIOACTIVE MIEED WASTES 9482 1994(01) 09/02/94
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATORY I.ANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES 9482 1995(01) 06/30/95
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS 9487 1986(12) 12/30/86
CONTAINERS CLEANING OTHER THAN TRIPLE RINSING - PAPER BAGS 9441 1985(15) 05/20/85
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE. TRANSPORT. AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. DEVELOPMENT DF 9482 1985(01) 11/26/85
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS 9482 1986(01) 01/21/86
CORRECTIVB ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U S ARMY - ARERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS 9502 1986(09) 05/08/86
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 9451 1986(01) 03/17/86
EMPTY CONTAINER RULE APPLIED TO TANKER OR VACUUM TRUCKS 9441 1986(02) 01/07/86
LAB PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ASPECTS 95S1 1990(02) 08/08/90
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262 9453 1987(03) 07/01/87
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTIONS REINTERPRETATION OF 9453 1987(08) 12/15/87
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENBRATOR E ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS 9453 1986 (04) 07/25/86
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT 1987(01) 03/25/87
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS 9461 1989(01) 01/03/89
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERY CARCASSES 9441 1993(231 11/10/93
REGULATORY STATUE OF MERCURY BATTERIES AS HAZARDOUS DEBRIS 9443 1994(02) 02/04/94
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS. BURNING OF 9441 1986(04) 01/07/86
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION 9453 1989(07) 07/13/89

-------
07/06 198
REWORD INDEX
P a g e (So. 22
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA AND REGULATIONS
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS BATTERIES. CAPACITORS. LAB PACKS
TANE TRRATHENT PROCESSES
THE LABELING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 40 CFR PART 273 FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE BATTERIES
TNIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
TRSATHENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262 34
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE PROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS
USED OIL FILTERS REGULATION
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES PROM
9453 1987(01) 02/22/87
948LL986(13) 12/31/06
9403 1990(02) 08115/90
9593 199 (04) 05/13 /97
6SS 1 i960(1S) 12/20/90
SSS1 1991(13) 12/20/91
9441 398fl52) 06/26/87
94S3 1906 (07) 12/0S/86
9453 1991102) 09/20/91
9441 1990(30) 10/30/90
9441 1906(20) 04/07/86
9441 1983(07)
9441 1986(90)
9441 1984(303
9441 1987 (77a)
9444 1909 (OS)
9441 1997(03)
9992 1904(00)
9441 1904(26)
9441 1984(18)
9441 3683(10)
9441 1984 (2S)
9442 1993 (01)
9441 1906(02 )
9432 1990(03)
9441 190S(19)
9441 1985(41)
9441 1991(16)
9457 1987)01)
9442 1993)02)
9442 1993)05)
9441 1986(04)
9441 1990(10)
9441 1984(34)
9431 1993(01)
9444 1986(D3)
09/01/03
12 /01/86
12/01/84
09 /01/87
07 /2 1/09
0 4/11/97
O9 12/94
0 9/11/04
08/01/84
12/13 /8 3
09/10/04
09/30/9 3
01/07/06
09/13/90
05/11/ 8S
12/12/95
10/22 /9 1
03/25/87
10/07/93
12/23/93
03/07/86
04/10/90
11/28/84
07/28/93
03/12/86
Empty
•CONTAINER RESIDUE, REGULATION OP
EMPTY CONTAINERS
EMPTY CONTAINERS. POURING ADDITIONAL WASTE PROM
flJASTE IDENTIPICATION
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASNWATERE
APPLICABILITY TO THE MIXING OP PAINT AND COATINGS THAT HAVE SEPARATED IN THE CONTAINER AND EMPTY PAINT CANS
CLARIFICATION OF THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION PROVISIONS CONTA1NED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
CONTAINERS THAT NELD CO)OIERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS. DEFINITION OF EMPTY
CONTAINERS 1 TRIPLE RINSING FOR FERTILIZER
CONTAINERS. TRIPLE RINSING OF EMPTY
CONTAINERS, TYPES OF EMPTY - RESIDUE NANDLINO
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION PROM A TANK SYSTEM
EMPTY CONTAINER RULE APPLIED TO TANXER DR VACUUM TRUCKS
EMPTY CONTAINERS REGULATORY STATUS
EMPTY DRUMS CONTAINING METALLIC NICKEL OR NICKEL OXIDE
EMPTY TANK CARS TEAT CONTAINED CO38IERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT THAT FORMERLY CONTAINED HAZARDOUS WASTE
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL EY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT
REOULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND C009(ERCIAL/INDUETEIAL AEROSOL CANS
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCNARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS - BURNING OP
STEAM-SPRAYING OP AN EMPTY TANK
TANK CARE AND DRUMS • DEFINITION OP EMPTY
TRIPLE-RINSING REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO CONTAINERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE HA1ARDOUS WASTES
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULAT1ON OF PENTACNLOROPNEHOL
CONTAINMENT
(See Secondary COntalDment)
CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
CONTAIPEIE(TT EUILDI(EIS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS
CONTAIFDIENT EUILDINGS AS INDEPENDENT NAIARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
(See HazardOuS Waste IdentifiGatiOn)
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
(See Naserdous Waste Identtlicstton Rule)
REEF / /
XEEF / /
9453 1994 (01) 09/01/94
9402 1991(61) 11/01/93
REEF / /
EREF / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 23
CONTAMINATED SOIL
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) (See also Corrective Action) XREF / /
CONTINGENCY PLAN
XREF / /
CONTINGENCY PLANS-INFORMATION SUBMISSION 1984 (01) 09/10/84
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS 9489 1991 (02) 09/31/91
Spills
“I4ULTISOURCE LEACNATE (F039) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS 9444 1991(06) 11/01/91
RESPONSES TO ACCIDENTAL SPILLS OF LISTED OR CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES 9471 1986(01) 09/29/86
CONTINUING RELEASES
(See Corrective Action) / /
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORS )CEM5)
(See Boilers and Industrial Furnaces) XREF / /
CORPORATE GUARANTEE
(See Financial Responsibility) / /
CORRECTIVE ACTION
(See also Groundwater Monitoring. Enforcement, Interim Status Process, Permit Conditions) XREF / /
“CORRECTIVE ACTION 3008(h) FOR CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITY 9S02 1987(01) 01/01/87
“CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PERMITS 9525 1988(01) 02/01/88
“CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITY AT FACILITIES THAT LOSE INTERIM STATUS 9528 1987(01) 01/01/87
“CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REOUIREMENT 9S02 1986(10) 05/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9484 1986(07) 07/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR NEW FACILITIES 9481 1986(10) 10/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS 9502 1986(07) 04/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS 9527 1986(02) 04/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION IN PERMITS 9521 1986(06a) 06/01/86
“CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WHILE SEEKING A MAJOR PERMIT MODIFICATION 9502 1986(03) 01/01/86
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS SOILS AND DEBRIS FROM RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION 9551 1988(14) 12/01/88
“PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TC UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL 9441 1990(31) 10/01/90
APPLICA5ILITY OF ‘SUPERPUWD LDR GUIDES” 9551 1991(15) 01/07/91
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL MID MIXED WASTE. AEA AND DOE INTERFACE 9441 1986(46) 06/02/86
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST 9441 1993)16) 09/15/93
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, REGULATORY STATUS OF 9528 1987 (02) 03/11/87
COORDINATION BETWEEN RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION AND CLOSURE MID CERCLA SITE ACTIVITIES 9502 1996(04) 09/24/96
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, ISSUES AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR 9S02 1986(01) 01/08/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES 9502 1986(04) 02/13/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP). CONTENTS AND USE OF 9502 1987(04) 03/13/87
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES 9502 1986(14) 08/22/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY, HQ SUPPORT 9502 1986(19) 10/07/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U 5 ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS 9502 1986(09) 05/08/86
DOD’S IRP PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1986)17) 09/29/86
FACILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1986(05) 03/24/86
FIBER OPTICS FOR IN-SITU MONITORING 9502 1987(09) 09/03/87
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARIES 9502 1989)01) 03/02/89
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD 9502 1986(20) 12/08/86

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 24
PARTIAL. PERM iTTING OF INCINERATOR UNIT (DOW) 9522 1985(04) 08/10/85
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND OIEI’OBAL RESTRICTIONS 9502 1986(11) 06/16/86
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLANS AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR RCRA GROUND-WATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ACTIVITIES 9445 1993406) 07/07/93
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM 9431 1991)03) 05/17/91
RCRA PERMIT REAUTNORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III 9541 1985)01) 03/06/85
RCRA PERMITS WIDE )(SWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUER PERMITS 9S12 1987)06) 06/30/87
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES 9501 1987(02) 12/14/67
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 9502 1989 (02) 05/25/89
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS, INFORMATION ON 9502 19eE)Ola( 01/23/66
STATE AUTNORIIATION TO REGULATE HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES 9541 1986)20) 10/20/86
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCN PERMITTING COMMENTS 9523 00-18 03 /14/89
SIPB4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-15 03/30/88
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OP 3005) 1) OF RCRA TO 9476 1987(01) 06/09/87
TREAThENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILASLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS 9484 j9 87(12( 11/25/87
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION 9502 00-3 08/04/86
USE OF THE PROPOSED SUBPART S CORRECTIVE ACTION RULE AS GUIDANCE PENDING PROMULGATION OF THE FiNAL RULE 9502 1991(01) 03/27 191
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE 9481 1987)01 1 02/25/87
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(281 04/07/86
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM RILES 1988)02a) 01/26/88
Administrative Order
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL 9504 1991(01) 11/07/91
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502 00-2 04/18/86
GUIDANCE ON NOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004(U) AND ORDER 300 5(N) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1989(04) 08/10/89
IS A SECTION 3008(h) ENFORCEMENT ORDER AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU’ 9502 1995(01) 02/17/95
PREVIOUSLY UNREGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDERS 9502 1986)078) 04/30/86
REGION III ISSUES ON SECTION 3004(U) A(IT)(ORITY 9502 1987)02) 03/31/87
Area of Contamination )AOC)
SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY OF THE AREA OF CONTAMINATION (AOC) 9502 1996 (02) 03/25/96
Cleanup Standards
•CLASSIFICATION OF LEACNATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9554 1991 (021 01/01/91
•REINJECTSD GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREAI74ENT 95S4 1991(03) 04/01/91
APPLICAEILITY OF RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CERCLA RESPONSE ACTIONS 9593 2989)02) 11/13/89
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RRSTRICTIGNS TO RRINJECTION OF TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CERCLA MED RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 9554 1989(05) 12/20/89
CLARIFICATION OF EPA’S GUIDANCE ON COORDINTION OF CLEAN-UP ACTIONS UNOERTAIEN PURSUANT TO RCRA AND CRRCLA 9502 1997(01) 04/17/97
CONCURRENCE ON 77)5 USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL 9504 1991 (01) 11/07/91
CORRECTIVE ACTION RULE 9502 5988 (01) 08/23/88
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL 9444 1981(26) 07/02/t i
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES 9502 1990)01) 05/07/90
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEANUP OF FINAL NFL SITES UNDER RCRA 9502 1990)02) 07/11/90
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT ON WOOD PRESERVING WASTES 9554 1990(1 W 09/26/90
Contaminated Soil
PERFORMANCE AND SAFE APPLICABILITY OF COW-MIX TECNNOI.OGIES AND BIORSMEOIATIOI) FOR PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SITES 9502 1996)03) 04/24/96
PERMITTING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMRNTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED EDIL NNICN IS NAEARDOUE OR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9561 1996)04) 11/27/96
USE DF SETS-SPECIFIC LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TREATARILITY VARIANCE DURING CLEANUPS 9554 1997 (01) 01/08/97
Continuing Releases
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP), CONTENTS AND USE OF 9502 1987 (041 03/12/87
CorreCtive Action Management Unit
CONCERN REGARDING SPA ’S PLANS TO DISALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT )CAI4U) PROVISION 9S02 1996)03) 10/18/95
EFFECTS OF THE RRCOLATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNITS (CAMU 5) ON THE MANAGEMENT OF “AS-GENERATED NAIARDOUS WASTES 9502 1993(01) 05/04/93
GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT CONCEPT 9502 1992(02) 08/31/92
IS A SECTION 3008(h) ENFORCEMENT ORDEE AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU’ 9902 1999(01) 02/17/95

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 25
PERMItFING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIRSMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOIL WHICH IS HAZARDOUS OR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1996(04) 11/27/96
RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS. IMPLEMENTATION 9502 00-4 08/21/06
Regulated Unit.
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO TSD UNITS 9480 1.996(01) 02/20/96
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR 5WMUS THAT NAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER 9401 1987 (05) 06/17/07
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES 9502 1986(021 01/31/06
Release
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITIES 9502 1995(02) 02/01/95
CORRRCTIVR ACTION BEYOND INTERIM STATUS FACILITY BOUNDARY 9502 1996(01) 01/01/96
‘ENFORCEMENT USING 1008(h) AUTHORITY AI 3013 ORDERS 9502 1986(18) 09/01/86
3000 (h) OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT. INTERPRETATION OF 9502 1905(09) 12/16/85
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO TED UNITS 9480 1996 (01) 02/20/98
CLARIFICATION OF THE USE AND MANAGEMENT OF MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE EASE FIRE TRAINING PITS 9499 1900 (02) 08/11/80
CLARIFICATION ON RCRA AND TSCA JURISDICTION OVER INFECTIOUS AND/OR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED WASTE 9441 1995(06) 02/21/95
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502 00-2 04/10/06
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502 1996 1061 04/15/06
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS 9444 1906 (07) 04/07/86
FEDERAL FACOLITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016 9502 1907 (03) 03/06/87
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR 9409 1907 (02) 07/22/07
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLu IN DRAFT NSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY) 9401 1987 (02) 03/10/07
NSWA APPLIED TO FEGERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE) 9502 1995(06) 10/29/05
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1986(08) 04/30/86
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES 9502 1996(02) 01/31/86
REGION III ISSUES ON SECTION 3004(U) AUTHORITY 9502 1987)02) 01/31/87
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9502 1987(05) 04/02/87
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 luL DEFIN1T ION OF 9502 00-6 07/02/87
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITE. INFORMATION ON 9502 1906( Ila) 01/23/86
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (FAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/86
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS. APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1900 DEADLINE TO 9501 1905(01) 10/01/85
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1906(20) 04/07/86
Remediation
CERTIFICATION PROCESS ON EIOTECNNOLOGICAL METHODS FOE EEMEDIATION OF INDUSTRIAL FAC1L1TIEE 9406 1909(01) 03/30/09
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS 9476 1991(01) 05/02/91
CONCERN REGARDING EPA’ S PLANE TO DIEALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THE CORRECTI YE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT ICAMU) PROV0SION 9502 1995 (13) 10/18/95
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATARILITY VARIANCE 9551 1990(05) 10/09/90
DRAFT SAMPLING AJ(D ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NM PLATING CD 1PANV 9433 1990(06) 11/27/90
INTERPRETATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE REMEDI8TION OF CONTAMINATION 9502 1999(03) 06/15/09
QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PERFORM ENVIRONMENTAL ERMEDIATION TASKS 9502 1994(01) 09/14/94
Eo lid Waste Management Units
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO TED UNITS 9400 1996(01) 02/20/96
Solid Waste Management Unite )SWMUa)
CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITIES 9502 1995(02) 02/01/95
CORRECT1VE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HANDLING SCRAP METAL RECLAMATION 9502 1905(04) 06/01/85
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES 9502 1906(14) 00/22/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U 5 ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS 9502 1986(09) 05/00/b6
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016 9502 1907(01) 03/06/07
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1906(13) 00/22/06
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMUa THAT NAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER 9481 1907)05) 06/17/07
IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS 9502 1995(01) 02/06/05
POET-CLOSURE PERMIi I ING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 9476 1905(04) 09/25/05

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 26
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
REGION I II ISSUES ON SECTION 30041W AUTHORITI
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT (SWMU) DETERMINATION
SOLID WASTE MANAGS)4ENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 Cu)
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 Cu) • DEFINITION OF
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS, INFORMATION ON
SUMMARY OP PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SWIPE
WOOD TREATMENT PLANT DRIP AREAS AS SNMUS. REGULATION OF
Voluntary Cleanups
VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CONSTRAINTS
VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION
CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT
(See CorreCt ive Action)
CORROSIVE WASTEE
(See CharacteristiC Nalardous Haste)
COST
(See Financial Responsibility)
COST ESTIMATES
(See Financial Responsibility)
COVER DESIGN
(See Final Cover)
CREOSOTE
(See Wood Treatment, MacardouR Waste Identification)
CYANIDE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) (See also SW-046)
DATA
9521 1905(01) 09/25/RE
9502 1907(02) 03/31/07
9403 1991(01) 01/04/91
9502 1907(07) 07/24/07
9502 01-6 07/02/87
9502 1906(Ols) 01/23 106
9523 00-14 03/1.4/66
9441. 1956(69) 09/1.2/86
9502 1906(15) 09112/BE
9502 1905(02) 06/17/05
9502 1900(02) 02/30/00
9502 1907111) 12/21/07
KEEP
XREF
EREF
REEF
IREF
REEF
EREF
/ 1
/ /
I /
I /
/ 1
F /
//
REEF
/ /
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY. EQ SUPPORT
9502
1908(19)
10/07/06
NDncoecliance
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 270 10(1.3 (10)
9524
1900(01)
02/23/68
DR MIHIMIS
(See alao Listed Hazardous Waste)
‘TECHNICAL GRADS SOLVENT FORMULATIONS MD 77(8 £003
‘TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEHATER FOR PURPOSES OF
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (OW l) FOR S
LISTING
SECT ION 261 3(a))2) (iv)(A)
OF THE HASTE CODES PEOM A TOLUEHE OIIEOCYANAIE (701) TREATASILITY
RREF
9444
9441
GROuP 9554
l994(05)
1991 (13)
1994 (05)
/ /
06/01/94
07/01/91
10/24/94

-------
07/06/98 REYWOED INDEX Page No 27
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STOP E yAAD5 9409 1991 (02) 05/31/91
REGULATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER THE SEPTEMBER 10. 1992 RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 9592 l994(0 ) 07/22/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 9441 1909(02) 01/03/09
DE MINIMUS
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE STATUS OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES 9441 1997(06) 07/24/97
DEADLINES
(See Permit Process) (See also State Authorization) XREF / /
DEFINITION
(See Solid Waste. Hazardous Waste Identification. Regulated Unit) XREF / /
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
(See Permit Process) XREF / /
DELISTING
(See also Appendix VIII. Appendix IX. Hazardous Waste Identification. Characteristic Hazardous Waste) XREF / /
DELISTING BY STATES 9541 1986(24) 10/01/86
DELISTING OF E051 HASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS 1986(12) 04/01/86
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FRGM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY 9433 i994(03) 11/01/94
ADOPTION OF TCLP FOR DELISTING DEMONSTRATIONS 9433 1990(031 06/14/90
CHLORINATED DIOXIN WASTES (F023) 9444 1985(16) 09/26/85
COMBINATION OF SLUDGES FROM ALL IMPOUNDMENTS TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSIS 9433 1987(07) 04/13/87
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TRRATABILITY VARIANCE 9SS1 1990(051 10/09/90
CYANIDE FURNACE CRUCIBLES TREATMENT 9433 1990(05) 09/26/90
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE 1987(16) 07/31/87
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACNAT5 LEVELS 1986(01) 01/07/86
DELISTING OF WASTE BY AUTHORIZED STATES 9542 1980(04) 10/31/80
DELISTING OF WASTE GENERATED FROM ZINC PNDSPHATING ON CARBON STEEL 9441 1984(24) 09/06/84
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTSWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE 9433 1991(01) 03/07/91
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASN 9433 1991(03) 07/10/91
DELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2.4.5-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES 1987(26) 10/28/87
DELISTINO PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE 9433 1990)07) 12/21/90
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1985(05) 11/27/85
DELISTING PETITION-STEEL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE P 9433 1986(07) 03/18/86
DELISTING PETITIONS. PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING 9433 1987)15) 07/28/87
DELIETING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TREAThRNT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES 9433 1987(22) 10/02/87
DELISTING RESIDUE FROM TREATMENT OF LISTED WASTES 9441 1981 (05) 04/14/81
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS. CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES. STEEL INDUSTRY 1984(06) 12/18/84
DELISTING. INTERIM STATUS. AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U S NAMEPLATE COMPANY 9433 1987(03) 02/2S/87
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION 1986(10) 04/24/86
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1986(19) 12/09/86
DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTE RINSEATES. DISPOSAL BY DEEP WELL INJECTION 9444 1985(14) 09/10/85
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE. EXCLUSION PETITION 9433 1984(05) 12/11/84
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS 9433 1987(14) 07/20/87
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING REGULATIONS 9504 1987(01) 07/20/87
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED 9433 1986(04) 02/14/86
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LRACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986(03) 01/07/86
EXCLUSION OF WASTE GENERATED AT INDIVIDUAL FACILITIES (DELISTING) 9542 1982 (01) 05/25/82
F006 LISTING FOR PICELINO AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES 1987(55) 12/28/87
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES 198S(04) 10/23/85

-------
01/06/98 KEYWORD iNDEX Page No. 28
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AS A BASIS TO DENY A DELISTINO PETITION 9433 3987(08) 04/24/87
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR P006 WASTE 9441 1986(78) 10/12/86
HSWA EFFECT ON STATE DELISTING CSIONS 9433 1.985 (02) 05/16185
X035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1907 )27) 12/11/07
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELISTING 9484.1986)05) 05/23186
MAGNESIUM SULFATE VS AU84INUM SULFATE DELESTING PETIT ION 9433 1990)01) 09/24/90
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED Mliii PESTICIDE PRODUCTS 9444 1987)40) 09/09/87
METAL, R061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION 9433 1987)18) 08/07/97
MIXTURE OF P003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS 9441 1987 )61) 08/17/87
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND )(AIAP US WS TSS 9441 1967106) O x/ lI/ B ?
P9 rITIoN TO WITHDRAW 8090 AND 8091 LISTINGS 9444 1989 (11) 1,0/03/89
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES TOOK WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITNIN THE STATE 9541 1986 (04) 03/03/86
SOI l, CONTAMINATED WITN TOLURNE DIISOCYANATE (iDI) 9433 1990(02) 05/31/90
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION 9433 1991(02) 04/26/91
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR GENERATED FROM PORCELAIN ENAMEL INDUSTRY. DSLISTING OF 9433.1984 (03) 10/23/84
SUBSURFACE FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL 9431 1991 (01) 03/26/91
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DSLISTINGS AND HSWA EFFECTS ON 9433 1996614) 05/27/86
WASTES PROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER TI lE REINTERPRETED P006 LISTING 9444 1987 (28) 07/13/87
Teniporary Exclusion
•DRLISTING OF R051 WASTE AT PETROLEIPI REFINERY EFFECT 000 INTERIM STATUS 9433 1986(12) 04/01/86
RCRA 300 1(t) (2) (b) AND STATES’ EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS NAIAJ(DOUS 9541 1986(05) 10/31/86
RCRA 3001(t) (2) (b) AND STATES’ EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS 9433 1986(09) 04/16/86
REGULA1VRY STATUS OF FACILITIES PRRVIOUSLY GRANTED TEMPORARY EXCLUSIONS 9441 1987(57) 07/31/87
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FITI’URE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY 9433 1986(17) 09/30 , 86
STATUS OP FACILITY WEERE A TEMPORARY DELISTING SXCWSION WAS NEVER GRANTED 9433 1986(06) 03/10/86
SURFACE TNPOUNDNSITTS HOLDING ONL’6 I-WASTES GENERATED UNDER A TEMPORARY BICIA)SIOI4 9431 1987 (21) 10/05/07
TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY DRLISTEI) WASTES, REGULATORY STATUS 9433 1986(05) 02/24/86
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELISTINGE AND HEWA EFFECTS ON BOTH 9433 1996(14) 05/27/86
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIND TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTD) 9448 1987(30) 04/10/87
VHS Model
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA ’S MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1986)21) 12/11/86
DRLISTING PETITION. USE OP VHS MODEL 9433 1989(05) 11/27/85
DELISTIND PETITIONS FOR R’WASflS MAnAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITOR1NG REQUIREMENTS 9433 1987(21) 09/28/87
DRLIETINO REGULATORY ETNODARDS FOR FREG14 9423 1987(20) 09/03/87
DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION BASED ON EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1987(09) 03/19/87
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DSLISTING PETITION 9433 1986(19) 12/09/86
F006 WASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO SVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR 9433 1987(09) 06/08/87
E103/El04 WASTE STRRAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BOAT, AND DRL1STING CRITERIA 9433 1987(06) 04/OZ/87
RECONSIDERATION OF DELISTING DENIAL BASED ON USE OF VHS, TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD, AND MCL 0433 1986(08) 03/24/86
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS. USE OF VHS MODEL 8433 1987(25) 10/26/67
DENIAL
(Bee Pexmst Process under Permit Densel) EESF / /
DENTAL AMALGAM
(See Scrap Mets 1) XRBF / /
DEPAWIICIIT OF DEFENSE (DODI
(See Pedsrel Facilities) REEF / /

-------
07/06/96 KEYWORD EX Page No 29
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE)
(See Federal Facilities) (See also Mixed Wastel XREF / /
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
(See Generators. Transporters) XREF / /
DERIVED-FROM RULE
(See also Mixture Rule) XREF / /
DOI4ESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION 9461 1987(04) 07/01/87
EXCLUSION OF LABORATORY WASTES FROM THE MIXTURE RULE 9441 1996(06) 05/01/96
RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261 9441 1991(19) 12/01/91
SPENT SOLVENTS FROM VARNISH STRIPPING 9441 iSS6(57) 09/01/66
APPLICABILITY OF F006 HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELECTROLRSS NICKEL PLATING SPENT SOLUTIONS 9444 1994(06) 09/21/94
SEVILL AMENOMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY 9441 1987 (76) 09/15/67
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO A FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING DUCT SYSTS4 9441 1995(33) 10/19/95
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1967(98) 12/24/67
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. RCRA REGULATORY STATUS 9442 1964(01) 12/26/64
DRAINAGE WArn BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS 9591 1966(15) 01/21/68
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREA’INSNT PROCESS 9444 1966(33) 12/29/66
EXB4PTION FOR LIME STABILIZED PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE GENERATED By THE IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY 9441 1996(09) 10/01/96
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7625. FEBRUARY 9. 1995) OF 1 (156 WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE 9441 1995(34) 11/27/99
MIXING LOW AND NIGH BTO WASTES - SHALl BURNING. BLENDING. MANIFESTING 9442 1987(04) 06/31/61
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1987(17) 05/20/61
PETROLEUM REFINERY NW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-PROM RULES 9441 1965(29) 08/23/65
PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA FROM AIR STRIPPING TOWER TREATING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9441 1969(17) 04/14/69
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U S EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY 9444 1986(05) 03/11/86
RESIDUAL WATEE DERIVED PROM AN EXRMPT WASTE (COAL ASN) IS 9441 1966(49) 06/16/66
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9433 1966(11) 04/24/66
SPENT ION EXCNANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1967(13) 05/05/87
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OF THE K062 LISTING, CORRECTION NOTICE 9444 1966131) 12/11/66
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES 9444 1966(03 1 02/11/66
SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1987(631 10/23/67
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIGUOR (K062) 9444 1967(471 10/23/67
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OP SANG SPIKED WITH TRICNLOROEENZENE AND NEXACNLOROETNANE 9441 1966(04 1 01/14/68
WASTE STREAMS GENERATED BY TREATHENT PROCESSES 9441 1992(41) 11/30/92
Residue
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS 9442 1995(01) os/ 26/95
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS 9441 1991(14) 09/01/93
INTERPRETATION OF THE M1XTURE RULE EXRMPTION AS IT RELATES TO ECRUEBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS 9441 1994(16) 06/10/94
PERCNLOROETNYLENE AND SURFACTA3JT. DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING 9441 1985(10) 04/10/SS
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE E069 WASTES 9496 1991(01) 06/05/91
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1964(05) 02/19/64
DESTRUCTION RDIOVAL EFFICIENCY (ORE)
(See Incineration) XREF / /
DETECTION LIMiTS
(See Analytic Methods) XREF / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 30
DETECTION MONITORING
(see Graundwater Nonitorsng) XREF / I
DIBUTYLIN DIFLUORIDS
(See Hazardous Waste Ident Ification) XREP / I
DILUTION
(see Characteristic Hazardous Waste) (See also Land Disposal Restrictions) / /
DIOXIN
(See also Listed Hazardous Wane, Land Disposal Restrictiolts , RCRA/CERLA Interface) XRSP / F.
9441 1989(11 1 03/01/85
•la(D DISPOSAL RESTRICTION. DIOXINS, AND 91-DAY ACCWOJLATION 9551 1917 (04) 01/01/17
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN 9553 1958(01) 02/01/88
VARIANCES PG BAN - EFFECTIVE DATRS FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS 9951 iSsS (22) 1 1/01/st
ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS eaRNING DIOXIN-LISTED wastse 9488 1992 (01) 09/22/92
CHLORINATED DIOXIN WASTES fF023) 9444 1985(16) 09/26/85
CLARIFICATION OH WHAT CONSTITUTES DiOXIN RELATED MaTERIALS 9444 1992(09) 12/24/92
CLOSURE PLAN FOR 1198 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC’S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT 94B8 1987)01) 02/09/a?
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING ‘TO EPA ’S MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1986)20) 12/11/86
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING NORILR INCINERATION 1986(10) 04/24/85
DIOXIN TN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACNLOROPNEP1OL 9444 1985 (02) 03/04/85
DIOXIN STANDARD USED TO TEST GAS CNROMATGGRAPNY COLUMNS, HANDLING OF 9441 1985(07) 02/11/85
DIOXIN TRIAL 8URNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERIIIT 9480 00-IA 05/07/86
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITN RADIOAC’IIVE PROPERT1 Es 9441 1985(26 ) 0 ’/0SF85
DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTE RINSEWIES, DISPOSAL BY IIEEP WSLL INJECTION 9444 1985(141 05/i l/fl
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA PERMITTING REOUIRENENTS FOR LESS TNAN 90-DAY ACCUMULATORS OF DIOXIN CONTAINING WASTES 9493 1985(02) 03/ 12/89
P021 LISTING POE SU0STANCEE CONTAINING CNLOROPI0SNOL1C ( (POUNDS 9444 1987(42) 09/23/87
P027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED PORMULATI000S IN WOOD PII8SERVINO 9444 1987(10) 04/09/87
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL 9444 1987(26) 07/02/87
IMPACT OF DRAFT )OAEARDOUS WASTE MININIEAT ION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON ONION REGIONAL IMPLEMENTAT iON OP AIR REGULATIONS 9573 1994(01) 01/10/94
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN D1OXIN WASTEE, MODIFICATION OP 9468 1985(04) 05/30/85
JOHNSTON ATOLL CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAl. SYSTEM (-3ACADS I RISK RELATED ISSUES 9498 1996(07) 10/92/95
LABORATORY CARCASSES CONTAINING ‘co 9441 1987(36) 05/14/87
LABORATORY 68149L5 EXCLUSION APPLICABIL1TY T I) SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - D 1OXIN 9441 1987(29) 04/30/87
LABORATORY WASTE GENERATED IN RESEARCH USING TCDD STOCH SOLUTIONS 9444 1986(16) 08/18/06
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES. ERODING. CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN 1986(30) 12/10/86
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITH TCDD THROUGH USE AS AN ANALYTICAL STANDARD 1987 (48) 10/21/07
MUNICIPAL WASTE CI)MBUSTIOE RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUWE 9443 1986(11) 05/27/06
RCRA I4ET9IODS AND OR ACTIVITIES (NOTES) 9445 1985(04) 06/30/69
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U S EPA COMBUSTION RESEARC h FACILITY 1988(05) 03/11/88
SOIL COIOTAM1I4A7ED WITH PESTICIDE 9441 1987(21) 04/08/87
SOILS PROM MISSOURI DIOXIN SITES, WNETNER RAIARDOUS 9441 1984(01) 01/06/64
SPENT CAREON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACHLOROPNENDL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER 9444 1986(09) 01/03/86
TCLP IN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROORAI4 AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM 1987(29) 11/18/87
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACNLOROPHDIDL 19E6 (DII 02/12/66
WASTES COVERED WIDER THE DIOXIN LISTING 9 ” 1986(23) 80/21/96
WAETES PEON ENVIEONNRNTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY 1987(341 08/07/67
WASTEWATSES EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF P021 . P F E 9444 1987(39) 09/02/97
WOOD PRSSERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRO)IMEN’TAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(28) o4/e7/ 06

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD fl EX Page No 31
DISCARDED MATERIALS
(See Solid Waste) (See sleo Land Disposal Restrictions. RCRA/CERCLA Interface) XREF / /
DISCHARGE
(See Wastewater) (See also Spills) XREF / /
DISPOSAL
(See also Land Disposal Facilities. Land Disposal Restrictions. Recycle. TSDFs) XREF / /
fl4ANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS 9441 1987(71) 08/01/87
TANE CLOSURE IN 1977 - RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9480 1907(01) 05/01/87
USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL. RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES 9493 1985(04) 11/01/85
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS DISPOSED OF 9441 198S(25) 07/01/85
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 9592 1994 (06) 07/11/94
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLORIDE ARE HOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION 9456 1994(01) 12/16/94
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 40 CFR 268 DEBRIS REGULATIONS 9551 1994(01) 10/06/94
CLEAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OF AN INCINERATOR 9488 1987(04) 06/12/87
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE. TRANSPORT. AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. DEVELOPMENT OF 9482 1985(01) 11/26/85
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES. DISPOSAL OF. FIFRA INTERFACE 9441 1985(28) 07/16/85
DECHARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT HAVE UNDERGONE CHEMICAL SOLIDIFICATION 9493 1985(05) 12/13/85
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. SAFE DISPOSAL OF 9451 1986(06) 12/iS/RE
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LRACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986(03) 01/07/86
FORMALDEHYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS 9441 1986(38) 05/01/86
HOLDIHG TEMPORARY PERIOD, STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS) 9432 1986(12) 07/28/86
INFORMATION ON RULES FOE DISPOSAL OF DISCARDED CONCRETE OH 9441 1997(04) 05/19/97
JOINT NRC-EPA GUIDANCE ON AN APPROACH FOR COPSIERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9487 00-8 08/03/87
K006 WASTES AND ON-SITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES 9444 1987(37) 08/19/87
LEAKS. SPILLS. AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS. MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO 9441 1986(07) 01/23/86
MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS 9451 1996(07) 07/12/96
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS DISPOSAL OF 9432 1987(12a) 11/04/87
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES 9502 1986(16) 09 122/85
PERFORMANCE AND PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004(b) • PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES 9489 1985(01) 09/29/85
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS 1990)01) 11/28/90
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS 9441 1992)22) 07/21/92
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE STATUS OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES 9441 1997)06) 07 124197
RESIDUALS GENERATED BY PROCESS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE TEEATMENT 9442 1988 (01) 02 110/88
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES 9487 1986)08) 05/27/86
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL 9441 1989(12) 03/31/89
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS EATTERIES. CAPACITORS. LAS PACKS 9487 1986(13) 12/31/86
SUITARILITY OF DISPOSING OF FROZEN STEAWRRRRIEE THAT MAY RE CONTANINATED WITH HEPATITIS A VIRUS IN A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL 9551 1997(05) 05/12/97
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS 9527 1992)01) 11/03/92
USE OF USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9592 1996)02) 02/15/96
USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9S92 1996(03) 02/26/96
USED OIL. BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING 9441 1986(40) 07/31/86
DO- IT-YOURSELFERS )DIYERS)
(See Used Oil) XREF / /
DOD
(See Department of Defense. Federal Facilities) XREF / /

-------
07/06/90
REWORD INDEX
Page NO. 32
DOE
(See Department of Energy. Federal Facilities) (See also Mixed Waste)
DOT
(See Department of Transportation, Generators) (See also transporters)
DOUBLE LINER
(See Minimum Technological Requirements)
DEE
(See Incineration under Destruction Removal Efficiency)
DREDGED SEDIMENTS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
DRILLING FLUIDS
(See Energy Exploration Wastes)
DRINKING WATER
•GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR RADIONUCLIDES
•REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULT) NO FROM CORREcT ) YE ACTION TREATMENT
EP TOXICITY LEVEL FOR BARIUM IN DRINKING WATER
NEALTN -BASED LEVEL FOE CYANIDE
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS
POTEOrrIAaY CONFLICTiNG REGULATION OF 1NFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE 00 ) 00W AND OSW
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN NYDROCARBON RECOVERY
XREF / /
9481 1887(06) 06/01/87
9554 1991(03) 04/01/91
9443 1989(03 1 04/20/89
9442 1988(021 03/30/88
9444 1990(05) 10/17/90
9521 1991(0)) 08/27/91
9521 1991(02) 08/30/91
REEF / /
9488 1991)03) 08/01/91
9489 1991(02) 05111/91
9451 1996)03) 05/01/98
((REF
RREF
/ /
/ /
((REF / /
EREF
XREF
/ /
/ /
RREP / /
DRIP P 5DB
•W000 PRESERVING WASTES - ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
DR I PPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS
RESOLUTION OF RCRA ISSUES RELATING TO TOOK WOOD PRESERVING INDUSTRY
DRUM SHREDDING UNIT
(See Treatment)
DUST
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUST
CEMENT El LN DUST WASTE
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
DUST SUPPRESS ION
I See also NSWA, Disposal. Used Oil)
( (REF / /
((REF / /
9414 1989(01) 03/17/89
9441 1988(36) 07/29/BE
9441 1988(27) 06/15/88
9441 1988(07) 03/10/88
XREF / /

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 33
flISED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT 9493 1955(061 12 101/85
USED OIL USED FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OR ROAD TREATMENT 9441 1990(09 W 03/01/90
DUST SUPRESS TON AS R0RD ADMEr 9493 1955(011 07/12/85
NSWA PROHISITION DN THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTR AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9493 00- lA 05/31/86
‘17(0 WASTE OIL MANAGENENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS 9495 1991(01 ) 06/05/91
USE OF USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9592 1996 (02) 02/15/96
USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9592 1996(03) 02/36/96
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
(See Hazardous Waste Identitication• Incsneration) XREF / /
ELECTROPLATING
ISee also Lteted Nazardoua Waste. Solvents) XREF / /
AIR EMISSIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS 9442 1991(03) 06/01/91
•ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS 9432 1989(01) 08/01/89
F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXT’JRE 9441 1981(11) 02/01/87
F009 LISTING FOR ELECTROPLAT ING AFTER CYANIDE SATE 9444 1989(06) 07/01/89
•I8ASTEWATER TREAIR4EIIT SLUDGE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING 9444 1984(02) 03/01/84
flIASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS 9453 1984(02) 05/01/84
CADMIUM WASTES FROM MILITARY COATING MATERIALS 9441 1990(11) 04/12/90
DETERMINATION WHETNER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE 9441 1995(24) 06/30/95
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY 1990(06) 11/27/90
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACNININO WASTES AND TNR SCOPE OP THE FOOG LISTING 1981(03) 01/27/87
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 9442 1901(03) 07/28/87
ELECTROPLATING R1HSEWATERS NOT IN P001-009 LISTINGS 9444 1908(07) 04/07/88
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE. EXCLUSION PST1TIDN 9413 1984(05) 12/11/84
ELECTROPLATING WASTES 9441 1991(06) 05/29/91
P006 AND P019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS 1986(09) 05/02/AS
P006 LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING 9 ” 1981(09) 03/26/87
P006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY 1981(19) 05/22/87
P006 LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCNING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES 1987155) 12/29/87
P009 LISTING AND TIlE MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSENATERS AND RESINS 1981(31) 07/28/47
P019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 1981(22) 06/24/87
IMMERSION PLATING WASTEWA’TERS-8RONZE PLATING 9442 1988(05) 10/03/88
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY 9554 1981(02) 02/03/87
MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN THE P006 LISTING. NON-INCLUSION OF 1986(13) 06/24/86
RECYCLING NICEEL. COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES 9441 1983(09) 04/06/As
RECYCLING OP ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES IFIO6) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE 9481 1989(19) 04/26/B9
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PNOTORESIST SOLIDS )‘SKINS’) GENERATED IN THE PRINTED CIRCUIT ROARD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY 9443 1994 (04) 07/12/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP AN ION EXCHANGE RESIN WASTE 9441 1991101) 01/21/97
REINTERPRETATION NARROWING THE SCOPE OP TEE P006 LISTING 9444 1986(21) 10/04/86
REINTERPRETATION OF THE P006 LISTING 9444 1986(19) 09/29/86
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPNATING PROCESS 9444 1986(11) 05/22/86
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING RATE SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECGVEEY 9441 1989(34) 07/06/89
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESIN 9444 1985(11) 06/19/85
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 1981(13) 05/05/87
WASTE PROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE 1987(16) 05/20/87
WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING P006 ELECTROPLATING WASTES 9554 1988(05) 08/11/88
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED P006 LIET1NG 9444 1981(28) 01/13/87
WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED RASISI ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM P006 9444 1981(14) 05/08/87
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING DPEEATIORS 1985(11) 09/03/85
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULT1NG FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS 9444 1989106) 08/21/89
ZINC PLATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES GENERATED FROM 9441 1984(29) 09/24/84

-------
07/ 06/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 34
Zinc P1Btlng
CLASS IPICATION OP WAITEWATER TREATHENT SLUDGE P9 .0 (4 ¶149. REVISED - ZH1C-COBAI.T ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL” PROCESS
DELISTIND OP WASTE OIIIERATEO PROM ZINC PNOSPNATIND ON CARSON STEEL
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT (N P006 LISPING
ZINC PLATING (SNOREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL
I INC PLATING • NASTEWATUE TRSA19(Elrr SLUDGES GEI1RBATEO FROM
RLD4KNEARY NEUTRALI ZXIIO1I UNITS
ISee Exclus ions)
EMERGENCY PERMIT
9444 5951 (3101
9441 1989(48)
9444 1984(11)
9444 1987(08)
9441 1987(74)
9441 1987(54)
9441 1987(081
9444 1985(17)
9432 1587(13)
9441. 1185(18)
9444 1984(123
9443 1988(05)
9433 1991(02)
9444 1986(31)
9413 1984(01 )
8441 1984(31)
9441 1989(27)
9441.1986(61)
9441 1987(39)
9441 1807(17)
9441 1984(12)
9441 1985(70)
9493 1985(021
9441 1987(53)
9444 1987(47)
9444 1986(32)
07 /30/ 0
09/12/89
07/27/84
03/16/87
09/02/87
07/23/87
01/28 167
10/03/ IS
11/10/87
05/21/65
07/30/64
051 02/88
04/26/ 9 1
12/11/86
10/2 1 /04
10/25/k
07/16/ 85
08/10/85
05/20/ 87
03/21/87
06/04/84
06/05/85
13/14/89
10/23 /87
10/21/ 97
12/12/86
9441 1994 (20) 08/02/94
9441 1984(24 1 09/06/84
9444 1987(33) 06/30/87
9444 1964 (09) 06/13/84
9441 1984(291 09/24/84
XREP / ‘I
EMERGENCY PERMITS FOR DETONAT iON OP EXPLOSIVE WASTE
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN I994ED1ATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS
TANKS USRO FOR EMERGENCY Cafl1INMEIFT
TEMPORARY TANK SYSIS(5 USED IN RESPONSE TO EMERGENCIES. REQUIREMENTS FOR
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SNOCX SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE I4ATERIALS
EMISSION CONTROL WASTES
EMPTY
(See Slud 5 e(
ARE? / /
9527 1986(011 01/05/86
9527 1988(03) 08/11/88
9471 8984 (03) 09/06/84
9483 8987(040 /20/E1
9527 1992(01) 11/03/92
ARE?
Pickle Liquor
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION FOR 8062
EXCLUS iONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
N06 2 - SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR LISTING
N062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY It FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLAIDGE EXCLUSION
LIME-STABILIZED WASTE PICELE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR LINS-A0040NIA STABILIZED IRON OXIDE SLUDGE
MIXTURES OP PICKLE LIQUOR AND DINER WASTES AND THE LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LICUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION
PICKLE LIQUOR AND SCOPE OF N052 LISTING
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
SIC CODS POE A STEEL MANUFACIWERI PROCESSOR. PICKLE LIQUO I SLUDGE - POINT OP WASTE GENERATION
SPENT ACED 950)4 ELECTHQPOLI SNU1D OF STAINLESS STEEL
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR CtRROSIVITY
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OP THE E062 LISTING, CORRECTION NOTICE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR GENERATED PROM PORCELAiN SNARE). INDUSTRY, DELISTING OP
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR SLUOGN LIME-STABILIIED, IN IRON AND STEEL AND PORCELAIN ENAMELiNG INDUSTRIES
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED IN PRODUCTION OF FEREIC CELOR1DE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE
SPENT PICKLE LIOUOB DEPINITION AS NAEARDOUE
SPENT PICKLE LEOUOE, REUSE OP
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOE. STA 1US OF SUPERNATANT PROM LINE NIUTRAL)SAIION OF
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USE/REUSE EEEMPTION AS APPLIED TO
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
SUPEENATA I 1T FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATICN OP NASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS NAEARGOUS WASTE
SUPE8NATANT P9.0(4 TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR 18062)
WASTE LISTINGS P006 AND KI62, SCOPE OF
(See Containers. Tank System)
KEEP / /

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 35
(See also Compliance)
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLiCABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCR.A REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELEETING REGULATIONS
EPA ENFORCEMENT OF ECRA-AUTHORIEEO STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE LAWS MID REGULATIONS
OWN DEFICIENCIES IN FART Es , RESPONSES TO AND MECHANISMS TO PREVENT
INADEQUATE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION
INSPECTION AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 3007 OF RCRA
PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE PART 5 APPLICATION
PERMET COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMflry ISSUES (RED K)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS. IMPLEMENTATION
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Administrative Order
•ENFORCEMENT USING 3000 (h) AUTHORITY AND 3013 ORDERS
•RCRA COMPLIANCE ORDERS
3000 (h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES. USE DF
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES. NATIONAL PRIORITIES
GUIDANCE ON HOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004 (U) AND ORDEE 300E)H) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECT IVE ACTION
Enforcement Action
3000(h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES, USE OF
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL TEE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL
SUNHARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) CCNMENTE
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
(See Enforcement)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
APPLICABILITY OF NEPA’ S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO EPA • S ACTIONS UNDER ECRA
NP TOXICITY
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EPA I D NUMBER
(See also Generatore, Trensporters, TSDF, Notification)
•MANIFESTINO REQUIREMENTS AND EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMEERS
ENERGY EXPLORATION WASTES
(See also Mining Waste)
DRIP GAS EXCLUSION
01L AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION
TC RULE - IMPLDWNTATION
Drilling Fluids
DRILLING OPERATIONS. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM
ENFORCEMENT
EREF
9441 19 09(05)
9441 1950 (42)
9441 1906 (El)
9441 1957 (04)
9441 1990 129)
/ /
12 / Ol/E9
09/01/E S
11 103/ 16
Il / 13/El
io/ol/90
9441 1910(03) 09/04/50
KEEP
9433 1957(14)
9S04 1907(01)
9S41 1902(11)
9504 1904(11)
9521 1904(11)
9504 1906)02)
9S23 1904)10)
9522 00-3
9502 00-4
9541 1917)01)
1-
0 7/20 / 17
07/20/17
05/17/E l
11/29/04
05/02/84
04/17/86
12/10/04
11/13/07
09 /11/06
01/14/07
9502 1986)10) 09/01/06
9523 1986)03) 00/01/06
9502 00-7 03/00/85
9504 1991(01) 11/07/91
9502 00-2 04/10/06
9502 1916(04) 02/13/06
9502 1909(04) 00/10/89
9502 00-7 03/08/88
9S04 1991(01) 11/07/91
9521 00-12 03 130/07
EREF / /
REEF / /
9522 1979(011 03/22/79
XREP / /
XREF / /
9452 1990 (01) 02/01/90

-------
07/06/ 9 8
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 36
‘I’RANSFSR FACILITY AS Rjrr , COLLECTION PQUN’I’ 9461, 1991(01) 11/01/91
DO VESSELS TRANSPORTING A RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMBER FOR TRANSPORT RE’flIEEN THE U S AND BELGIUM? 9455 1995 (01) 02/17/99
GENERATOR I D NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, ASSIGNING 9491 1903 102) 09/30/03
PROGRAM EMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE OH ISSUANCE OF PROVISIONAL EPA 1 0 NUMBERS 9463,1900 102) 11/26/00
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATI4ENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. I D NUMBERS FOR 9441 1906(05) 01/16/06
USING A GENERATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER aND/OR MANIFEST TO DETERMINE LIABILITY 9451 1994(02) 03/04/94
Identif icat ion
‘DOT MANIFEST EEQUIREJ4E)OTS 9461 1987(05) 09/01/87
Identification NU.tere
‘IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS FOR TWO COMPANIES ON SA l lE SITE 9432 1980(02) 02/01/00
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9462 1995(01) 07/01/95
‘SIGNING THE MANIFEST AS AN AGENT WHEN IMPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9462 1995(02) 03/01/95
EPA I 0 NUMBER AND FACILITY LOCATIDN 9461 1989(03) 08/18/89
EPA ’S CURRENT INTERPRETATION OP THE REQUIREMENTS IN 40 CFR SECTION 262 12 REGARDING EPA ID NUMBERS 94S1 1995(01) 08/22/95
IDENTIFICATION NIJMBERS FOR RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATHENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9442 1906 (01) 01/16/86
INTERPRETATION OP GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1996 (06) 05/01/96
RAPID ISSUANCE OF IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS TO SITES UNDER INVESTIGATION By DEA 9451 1987(01) 02/05/07
EQUIVALENCY
(See Teal ME IbOdE ) IREF / /
EXCLUSIONS
(See RIEO AgriCU1t 1tR1 Waste, I4AIRIÔONB Waste ‘Ident ificat ion, Recycle. Solid Waste, Wastewater) ARE? / /
‘40 CFR SECTION 261 4 Cc ] )IAEARDOUS WASTES WNICN ARE EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN REGULATIONS 9441 1990(lla) 05/01/90
‘API EEPAEATOB SLUDGE, EXCLUSION OF WATER FRACTION PROM K051 LISTING 9441 1984(13] 05/01/04
‘APPLICABILITY OF THE SECTION 261 4(a) (2) EXCLUSIONS 9441 1987(84] 10/01/07
‘BATTERY REGENERATION 9441 1985( lOaI 09/01/85
‘COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 9441 1989(04 ] 02/01/09
‘CONDITIONS FOR EXCLUSION OF PORTABLE TREATMENT UNITS 9411 1984(021 03/01/84
flIOTEL DRY CLEANING WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSIONS 9441 1995(13) 13/01/95
fl.AB EXCLUSION, APPLICATION OF 1984(22 ) 07/01/84
‘LABORATORY TESTING FOR GIOXIN 9441 1985(11) 03/01/85
‘MEDICAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE 9441 1989(24) 68/01/89
‘MINING WASTE SECLUSION REINTERPRETATION 9441 1985(35) 10/01/05
‘MOBILE WASTEWATER TREA’IMENT UNITS 9432 1907(05) 06/01/87
‘POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EECLUSION 9441 1985(09) 02/01/85
‘EECLAIMED SPENT W000 PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION EN 261 4 (a) (9) 9441 1991(191 12/01/91
‘REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE FROM 01]. GATHERING PIPELINES 9441 1992(011 01/01/92
‘RESTAURANT WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 1995(191 05/01/95
‘SAMPLE 511C].USIQN 9441 1991)13e) 05/01/90
‘SECONDARY NATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS 9441 1992)13) 05/01/92
‘BASTE C lASSIFICATION 9441 1987)99) 12/01/87
‘WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS 9441 1986)96) 12/01/06
‘SERO OISCHARGS AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CWA APPLIIS 9441 1984(14) 05/01/84
APPLICABILITY OF THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE RECLUSION IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS 9442 1997 (01) 11/10/97
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGNITA9ILITY DEFINED 9443 19Rs(02) 02/26/85
CCA TREATED WOOD WMEN DISPOSED 9441 1991(11) 06/28/91
CLARIFICATION OF RCEA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED By CEMENT KILN DUST 9441 1993 (11) 0S/30/ 3
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE FLUIDS ASSOCIATED WITH CLEAN UP OF CRUDE OIL LEAES IN ACTIVE OIL FIELDS 9441 1991(058) 09/21/91
DEIONIZATION ACED 9443 198S(11) 05/12/86
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS PROM THE PRODUCTION OF CNLOROBENZENE 9441 1988(11) 04/21/58
DOMESTIC SEWAGE SLUDGE EXCLUSION 9441 1990(02) 02/12/90
DRILLING OPERATIONS. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM 9441 1980(031 09/04/80

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Pa9e No 37
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE 9441 1986(32) 04/21/86
EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE At FOUNDRY NOT A K06 1 WASTE 9441 1984)08) 05/03/84
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN CEMENT KILNS 9441 1907(78) 10/08/87
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL) 9441 1989(48) 09/12/89
EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON 9477 00-6 11/23/87
EXEMPTION FOR LIME STABILIZED PICKLE LIOUOR SLUDGE GENERATED BY THE IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY 9441 1996(09) 10/01/96
NOUSENOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE 9574 1991(01) 05/30/91
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON-ZINC BATTERIES 9441 1984 (07) 04/19/84
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF LAB SAMPLES 9441 1989(20) 04/27/89
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE 9441 199S(05) 02/17/95
R006 WASTES AND ON-SITS DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES 9444 1987(37) 08/19/87
E051 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION 9494 1985(02) 07/30/85
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 198S(03) 07/31/85
LAND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS 94S3 1987(09) 12/10/87
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C 9441 1986(55) 07/16/86
MIXING OF METHANOL AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9471 1983(01) 07/12/83
MIXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - FOOl-FOOS, REGULATORY STATUS OF 9441 1984(06) 04/10/84
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATHENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION 9441 1991(01) 01/03/91
OIL AND GAS EXEMPTION IN 3001(b) (2) (A) OF RCRA IRON SPONGE PROCESS 9441 1983(03) 05/25/83
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE 9541 1986(04) 03/03/86
PROPER DISPOSAL OF SILVER NITRATE AND CNLOROFOEM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS 9441 1993(01) 02/23/93
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS 9441 1986(65) 09/03/86
RCRA 3001(f)(2)(b) AND STATES’ EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS 9541 1986(05) 10/31/86
REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF COPPER ETCHANTS 9442 1996(03) 10/24/96
RESIDUES FROM U S NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER 9441 1987(16) 03/17/87
RESPONSE TO REGION III IMPLEMENTATION AND OVERSIGHT ISSUES 9541 1986(10) 05/01/86
SCOPE OF BEVILL AMENDMENT AS IT APPLIES TO PHOSPHATE MINING, PHOSPHORIC ACID PRODUCTION, AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES 9441 1992(10) 05/15/92
SCRAP DENP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DEHP, DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR 9441 1985(23) 06/27/85
SIC CODE FOR A STEEL MANUFACTURER/PEOCESSDR, PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE - POINT OF WASTE GENERATION 9441 198S(I8) OS/21/8S
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATHENT FACILITY 9S22 1988 (02) 03/07/88
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE, LIME-STABILIZED, IN IRON AND STEEL AND PORCELAIN ENAMELING INDUSTRIES 9441 1984(31) 10/25/84
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, STATUS OF SUPERNATAHT FROM LIME NEUTRALIZATION OF 9441 1984(12) 06/04/84
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO 9441 1985(20) 06/05/85
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO) 9441 1987(30) 04/30/87
THE REGULATORY STATUS OF IRON AND STEEL SLAGS AND GYPSUM 9442 1997)02) 0S/13/97
THE REGULATORY STATUS OF SULFUR-CONTAINING SECONDARY MATERIALS WITh A HEATING VALUE GREATER fl(AN 5,000 ETU/LE 9494 1997(01) OS/23/97
TRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A POW 9441 1986(88) 11/3p/86
WASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL REMOVED 9441 1987(53) 06/29/87
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE 9444 1987(39) 09/02/87
WHETHER SLUDGE FROM LIME TRRATHENT OF A MIXTURE OF E062 AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE QUALIFIES FOR THE LSWPLS EXCLUSION 9441 1996(12) 12/23/96
ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING SLUDGES EXEMPTION 9444 1990(04) OS/02/90
Chromium
SW-846 TEST METHOD 3060 9443 1987(20) 09/01/87
CHROMIUM WASTES. EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN 9441 1988 (03) 01/13/88
CHROMIUM WASTES TRIVALENT AND HEXAVAtENT, CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES 9441 1986(24) 03/21/86
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER 9493 1985)02) 11/14/85
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS 9443 1987(11) 06/08/87
USE OF WASTE LEATHER TRIMMINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ABSORBED MATERIALS 9441 1996(04) 06/11/96
ElementBry Neutralization Units
•CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS TREATING IN ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS 9441 1996(01) 02/01/96
•ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS 9471 1988(03) 07/01/88
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS GENERATING AND STORING NON-CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9472 1994(01) 12/01/94
STATUS OF WWTUB/ENUB AT GENERATOR SITES 9432 1995(01) 02/01/95
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION EXEMPTION 9471 1988)021 04/29/88
HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEM STANDARDS TO ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND EXEMPTED ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 9483 1988(01) 01/27/88

-------
17/06/98 KEYWORD iNDEX Page ND 38
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES 9483 1990102) 08/15/90
THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON NONHAZARDOUS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS 9554 1994(02) 01/05/94
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS EXEMPTION 9471 1987(02) 12/21/87
Exemption
‘CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING EXCLUSION 9441 1993(02) 02101/93
‘ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS 9471 1988 (03) 07/01/88
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS GENERATING AND STORING NON-CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9472 1994(01) 12/01 194
‘FUME INCINERATORS 9488 1986 (03) 03/01186
‘GENERATION AND RECYCLING 9441 1987(20 ) 03/01/87
‘NAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR EATYERY RECLAMATION 9497 1986(018) 05/01/86
‘MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION 9441 1987 (32) 04/01/87
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPORTED WASTES 9458 1994(01) 12/01/94
‘ oIL AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY 9441 1988(42) 09/01/88
‘PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS. SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9441.1986 (45) 05/01/86
‘REGULATOHY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER SCRA 9498 1994(10) 10/01/94
‘REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE 9571 1993)01) 07/01/93
‘STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION 1995)15) 04101/95
‘TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261 3(a) (2) ( lv) (A) 9441 1991(13) 07 101/91
•WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES 9441 1987(31) 04/01/87
‘WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION 9432 1988(05) 10/01/88
‘WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT /GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK 9483 1988(15) 07/01/88
APPLICABILITY OF PART 279 USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE FLEET SERVICING OPERATION 9592 1994(05) 06/10/94
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL 9441 1995 (08) 03/07/95
APPLICATION OF THE SCRAP METAL EXEMPTION TO LEAD FOIL USED IN DENTAL. X-RAY PACKAGES 1993 (05) 04/29/93
ARE RECOVERED SOLVENTS STILL EXEMPT IF LESS THAN 100% OF TNE RECOVERED PRODUCT IS RETURNED TO THE ORIGINAL PROCESS 9441 1997 (05) 06/03/97
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGERS EPA’S USED OIL PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS 9592 1995(01) 08/10/95
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES 9571 1993)02) 11/05/93
CLARIFICATION OF HOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1994(18) 07/11/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE ‘REBU’I7ABLE PRESUMPTION’ PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN TEE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 9592 1994(10) 09/28/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLE EXCLUSION FOUND IN 40 CFR 261 4(d) 9441.1994 122) 08/11/94
CLASSIFICATION OP WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED ‘ZINC-COBALT ALLOY PLATING ON CAREON STEEL’ PROCESS 9441 1994(20) 08/02/94
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DKLISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED 9476 1988(01) 01/29/88
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDiNG FURTHER STUDY 9441 1984(20) 09/16/84
CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR PROVISIONS 9441 1992(25) 09/25/92
DEFINITION OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING. WELTING. AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATESIALS 9488 1993(01) 12/ü/93
DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF A TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT (TNT) EXEMPTION 9432 1988(06) 02/02/88
DO RCRA REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE HANDLING. SHIPMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS? 9441 1999(07) 02/28/95
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION EXEMPTION 9471 1988)02) 04/29/88
SPA’S INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTION IN 40 CFR 261 3(a) (2) (iv) (F). A NEW SECTION OF EPA’S REGULATIONS ON CARBAMATE LISTING RULE 9441 1999)25) 08/03/95
EXEMPTION FOR MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH PROM HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION 9571 00-01 09/18/92
EXEMPTION FOE WASTEWATKR DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS 9441 1981(96) 12/10/07
EXEMPTION FROM PERMItTING REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE WATER TREA’fllEN’I’ UNITS 9522 1992(01) 01/16/92
EXPORT OF TRSATABILITY SAMPLES 9441 1992(09) 05/04/92
LEAKING DB DAMAGED EXPLOSIVES 9471 1988(05) 11/30/89
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION 9441 1981(74) 09/02/87
LIME-STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR LIMB-AMMONIA STABILIZED IRON OXIDE SLUDIS 9441 1981(54) 07/13/87
MANAGEMENT OP WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER 9441 1986(73) 09/25/46
MINIMUM NEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES RURNED IN SIPs 9498 1994(02) 09/20/94
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND TEE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION 9441 1986(94) 12/19/46
MIXTURES OF PICKLE LIQUOR AND OTWSR WASTES AND THE LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION 9441 1987(08) 01/28/47
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION 9441 1987(04) 01/13/87
ON-SITS TRSA’TMZNT EXEMPTION. REINTERPRETATION OF 9453 1987 (08) 12/19/87
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOE REMOTE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA FOR D1RECT OFFLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED FUEL INTO A CEMENT KILN 9483 1988(02) 01/28/88
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTSWATRR TREATMENT UNITS 9503 52- lA 01/02/86
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WW’I7IS 9483 1990(03) 09/20/90
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH) 9441 1986 (31) 04/21/86

-------
07 /06/ 98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 39
9488 1991(04) 09/30/91
9503 51-lA 12/24/85
9454 1994(01) 05/09/94
9441 1992(37) 10/29/92
9441 1993 (03) 03/05/93
9441 1988(39) 08/30/8
9493 1991(01) 01/08/91
9592 1994 (07) 07/22/94
9489 1994(02) 09/19/94
9441 1994(23) 08/19/94
9496 1993 (01) 12/27/93
9441 1994 (24) 08/30/94
9441 1992(01) 01/15/92
9471 1993(01) 06/02/93
9432 1993(02) 10/22/93
9441 1993(07) 04/29/93
9442 1993(05) 12/23/93
9451 1996(03) 05/01/95
9471 1986(01) 09/29/86
9441 1995)11) 03/22/95
9441 1989(22) 05/17/89
9441 1986(79) 10/20/86
9441 1988(23) 06/06/88
9441 1989(12) 03/31/89
9432 1987(08) 08/03/87
9441 1990)16) 06/19/90
9441 1996(03) 05/30/96
9523 00-14 03/14/86
9441 1991(15) 09/25/91
9442 1991(16) 05/01/91
9431 1989)03) 06/05/89
9432 1987(01) 03/17/87
9527 1992 (01) 11/03/92
9497 1997(01) 05/30/97
9592 1994(04) 06/09/94
9497 1991(01) 03/04/91
9441 1987(64) 08/13/87
9441 1986)40) 07/31/86
9441 19BS(43) 12/17/85
9431 1989(02) 09/26/89
9441 1995(01) 01/12/95
9444 1988(026) 01/26/88
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
ROW PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
RECYCLING OF COKE BY-PRODUCT RESIDUES
RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES
REGULATION OF OILY NAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
REGULATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER THE SEPTEMBER 10 • 1992 RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF TNE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT ‘POPPING FURNACE
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECNNOLGGIES (MRT)
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OP PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
REGULATORY STATUS OF HIGN PURITY CNEMICALS TNAT ARE INITIALLY USED BY CUSTOMERS AND THEN SOLD TO OTHER BUSINESSES FOR FURTHER USE
REGULATORY STATUS OF LABORATORY WASTEWATER
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITS AT DRY CLEANERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND THE USE OF SEPARATOR WATER EVAPORATORS AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
REGULATOEY STATUS OF SOLDER DRIPPINGS GENERATED DURING RADIATOR REPAIR OPERATIONS
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE
RESOLUTION OF RCRA ISSUES RELATING TO THE WOOD PRESERVING INDUSTRY
RESPONSES TO ACCIDENTAL SPILLS OF LISTED OR CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
REVISED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOB CITY OF CNICAGO V EDF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION (MWC) ASH SUPREME COURT DECISION
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
SECONDARY MATERIALS REGULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY
STATUS OF MIXED COAL PRODUCTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
it RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
TEST SAMPLES • EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGNOUSE SYSTEM
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
TRANSPORTATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERY COMPONENTS THAT ARE SNIPPED OFFSITS FOB RECLAMATION
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED O)L CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR REGENERATION EXEMPTION
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-YOUESELFERS
USED OIL. BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
WASTSWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN
WASTEWATEE TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION
WOULD REGENERATION EXEMPTION APPLY TO VARIOUS TYPES OF LOCATIONS AT WHICH LKAD-ACID BATTERIES ABE REGENERATED’
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
Filter PreBs
‘FILTER PRESS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT. EXCLUSION FOE
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING
Fossil Fuela
‘FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
‘MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
‘STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION IN 261 4(b)(4). FUEL MIXTURES
Gaseous Emissions
INCINERATORS THAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS. ECRA EXCLUSION. CAR APPLIES
9432 1984 (04) 05/01/84
9433 1987(10) 06/12/87
9441 1986(16) 02/01/86
9441 1984 (23) 07/01/84
9441 1995(16) 04/01/95
9441 1984(20) 08/16/84
9441 1981(01) 01/13/81
9441 1984(15) 07/31/84

-------
07 /06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 40
9441 1995(12) 03/01195
9441 1984(11) 04 /01184
9441. 1.984423) 07/01/94
9441 1985(35) 10/01/05
9571 1986(04) 07/01/86
9571 1989401) 01/01/89
9441 1984(21) 07/01/04
9571 1993 (011 07/01/93
5441 1987(76) I9/SS/b7
9443 1985(09) 10103/85
9571 1903(02) 11/05/93
9571 1907(01) 10/08/87
9441 1909 (01) 02/07/89
9494 1987(02 ) 04/15/87
9441 1984 (05) 03/23/94
9441 1984(19) 08/15/84
9441 1884 (09) 05/09/84
9441 1980(72) 09/1.8/98
9441 1986 (48) 06/10/86
9441 1986(81) 11/03/86
9441 1986 (55) 07/16/06
9443 1983(04) 07/05/83
9441 1986(49) 06/15/86
(See Exclusions) XREF / I
EXPANSIONS
(See Permit Conditions) (See also Interim Stst s Process)
EXPLORATION WASTE
(see Mining Waste)
EXPLOSIVE WASTES
(See Characteristic Hasardous Waste)
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(See also Transporters, Manifest)
‘EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
Mining Waste
‘DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE
‘EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EXCLUSION
‘MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
‘MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERFRRTAT(ON
‘MINING WASTE, X064, AND 3004(x)
‘ORE AND MINERAL EXTRACTION, SENEPICIATION AND PROCESSING EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
‘PRODUCED WATERS FROM NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION - EXCLUSION
‘REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
BEVILL AI4END)4SNT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
DECISION DEADLINES FOR RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUESTS
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING NAEARDOUS WASTES AND TN8 RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
INTERPRETATION OF THE OEV1LI. EXEMPT STATUS OF WASTES AT THE MAGCORP FACILITY
MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING NAXAROOLIS WASTE FUEL
MINING LABORATORY WASTES UNDER 40 CFR 261 4(b) (7) - EXCLUSION OF
MINING WASTE AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILTTY
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C
PNOSFNATE AND GAS PROCESSING 1NDUSTEY WASTES
RESIDUAL. WATER DERIVED PROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ARM) IS EXEMPT
Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL. RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED ROAD PERMIT
DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF A TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT )TET) EXEMPTION
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSS SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RSCTCLER
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECN)
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTIWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EXEMPTION
9541 1906)13) 06/24/96
9432 1995(07) 11/19/OS
9432 1980(06) 02/02/88
9411 1987 (01) 05/01/87
9413 1997(10) 06/12/87
9432 1987(10) 08/28/87
9432 1996(15) 12/22/96
9432 00-1 02/I1/ä6
9432 1986(06) 02/06/86
9441 1986(62) 08/19/06
XREF / /
XREF I /
XREF / /
XREF / /
9455 1986)01) 09/01/96

-------
07 /06/9 5
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 41
‘EXPORT OP RECYCLABLE MATERIALS 9456 1986 (01) 10/01/86
‘EXPORT OF RESTRICTED WASTE 9551 1987(22) 10/01187
‘EXPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION THROUGH TRANSIT COUNTRIES 9465 1995(02) 03/03/95
‘EXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9455 1987(01) 08/01/87
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR BArrERY RECLAMATION 9497 1986(015) 05/01/86
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPORTED WASTES 9455 1994(02) 12/01/94
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT 9497 1987(01) 02/12/87
CANADIAN MANIFEST FOR SHIPMENTS ENTERING THE U S 9462 1985(01) 11/29/85
DO VESSELS TRANSPORTING A RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMBER FOR TRANSPORT BETWEEN THE U 5 AND BELGIUM’ 9455 1995(01) 02/17/95
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION fl 1991(01 ) 02/05/91
EXPORT OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL 9462 1993(011 02/18/93
EXPORT OF TREATABILITY SAMPLES 9441 1992(091 05/04/92
EXPORT REQUIREMENTE FOR SPENT BATTERIES SENT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOE RECYCLING 9459 1987(011 06/19/87
EXPORTERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO MEXICO. RESPONSIBILITIES OF 9455 1987(02) 06/15/87
EXPORTING CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS SLUDGE FOR RECLAMATION 9453 1993(02) 03/22/93
EXPORTING PflOLEUM WASTE TO SOIm( AMERICA 9455 1989(01) 06/27/89
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF ‘NICKEL MATTE’ BY-PRODUCT 9441 1994(32) 12/23/94
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO REPORTED WASTES 9551 1991(07) 04/23/91
MOVEMENT OP NICKEL CADMIUM BATTERIES FROM MEXICO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES 9452 1993(01) 01/39/93
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES 9455 1991(03) 12/10/91
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PNOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES 9441 1992(39) 11/10/92
REPROCESSING OP BATIRBISS 9497 1987(02) 02/19/87
SALE AND SCRAPPiNG OF DOTS MARITIME OBSOLETE VESSELS FROM THE NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET 9441 1994 (21) 08/05/94
EXPOSURE INFORMATION
(See R iSk AEEeeElnent) EREF / /
EXTENSION
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions) XREF / /
EXTENSION 10 GENERATOR ACCUMULATIOtI TIME LIMITS FOR UNFORESEEN. TEMPORARY CIRCUMSTANCES 9453 1987(05) 08/12/87
EXTENSIONS TO STORAGE PROHIBITION AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 1987(01) 10/02/97
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE OGWDW AND OSW 9521 1991(01) 08/27/51
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY 9531 1991(02) 08/30/9 1
F-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waate Hazardous Waste IdentltIcatton) XREF / /
FACILITY
(See TSDFaI XREF / /
FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
XREF / /
FIElD ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR THE OCCIDENTAL INCINERATOR 9505 1586(01) 09/18/86
ECRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES 9501 1987 (02) 12/14/87
FEDERAL FACILITIES
XRSF / /
‘RECORDING STATE-REGULATED WASTES ON THE UHWM 94S2 1984 (03) 11/0 1/ba
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502 1986(06 ) 04/15/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9503 00-2 04/18/ES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES ISSUES AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR 9502 1906(01) 01/08/86

-------
0 7 / 0 6/ 90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page ND. 42
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES. NATIONAL PRIORITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U $ ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNOS
DEL1STING PETITION OF NITROGEl 1 TETROXIDE RINSATE
RSWA APPLIED TO FEOERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE)
MIXED WASTE (DOE FACILITIES) • DEFINITION OF
OPERATOR AT DOE OAK RIDGE FACILITY, DETERMINATION OF
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-OWNED CONTRACTOR-OPERATED (GOCO) FACILITIES
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
SIGNATORIES FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERMIT APPLICATIONS
STATE REGULATION OF FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR PURPOSE OF INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
VIOLATION OF EPA NAIAROOUS WASTE MANIFEST REGULATIONS BY FEDERAL FACILITIES
9S02 1995(041 02/13/86
950 1 1966 (09) 09/08/85
9433 1990(07) 12(21190
9512 1995(16) 10/29/95
9903.19$S(01) 05/10/95
9432 1994(01) 01/27/94
9472 1997(01) 06/24/87
9541. 1997(01) 01/14/87
9522 1985 (01) 02/11/95
9942 1990(05) 11/14/90
9492 1994 (12) 10/26/84
DOD
DOE
ARMY CHEMICAL/MUNITIONS SYSTEM. REGULATORY STATUS OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND ISP ACTIVITIES
DE4ILITARIEATION OF MUNITIONS
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE
DISCARORD WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY
000 MUNITIONS BECOME $01.10 WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA KNEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY TNEM
DOD’S IRP PROGRAM AND RCEA CORRECTIVE ACTION
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS • RION PRIORITY PERMITTING
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRPI - DOD
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS
QUALIFICATION OP AN ENGINEER FROM 11)8 CORPS OF ENGINEERS AS INDEPENDENT WITH RESPECT TO AN ARMY FACILITY
REACTIVE WASTE - EXPISOSIVITY
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLING PLAN FOR NOLIIOMAN AIR FORCE EASE
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
USING A GENERATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND/OR MANIFRET TO DETERMINE LIABILITY
VOLATILIZATION OP SOLVENTS COUNTED AS SOLVENTS USED
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND WIRED WASTE, ARA AND DOE INTERFACE
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
MIXED WASTES AT DOE FACILITIES, REGULATION OF
Inventory
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
Open Bunting/Open Detonation (09/00)
• INTRR1M STATUS FOR MILITARY FACILITIES OPEN BURNING AREA
CLARIFICATION OF THE USE AND MANAGEMENT OF MOUNTAIN NONE AIR FORCE EASE FIRE TRAINING PITS
OENILITARIF,ATIOII OF MUNITIONS
000 MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE lS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
OPEN EURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART *
FERROUS METALS
5927 1905(01) 11/19/85
9502 1906(14) 08/22/85
9441 19E7(031 01/07/87
9409 t997(03) 01/25/87
9444 1991(06) 11/26/91
9441 1906(31) 10/03/95
9502 1906(17) 09/29/86
9501 1996(81) 09/11/86
9502 1986 (20) 02/00/86
9502 1986(16) 08/22/ES
9488 1986(10) 09/11/86
9403 1987)20) 12/15/87
9443 1988(10) 09/13/88
9523 00-18 03/14/89
9484 1989(03) 06/20/20
9442 1991(16) oS/ a l/SI
9451 3994(92) 03/04/94
9441 1990 (08) 06/10/91
9494 1986102) 03/19/06
9441 1906146) 06/02/86
9484 1996(02) 04/02/86
9903 1985(02) 09/30/ES
9502 1907(03) 03/D6/87
9441 1904 (04) 02/01/04
9489 1900(02) 08/1l/E0
9441 1907(03) 01/07/87
9441 1995(31) 10/01/85
9409 1907 (02) 07/22/47
9502 1906(16) 09/22/86
9405 1908(01) 05/18/88
FIFRA
(See Nezardoue Waste Identification)
EREF / /
(See Agricultural Waste)
XREF / /

-------
1 1/05/98 KEYWORD INDEX PR e No 41
FILTER PRESS
(See sxcluelone) l IRE? / /
FINAl. COVER
(See also Closure Process) tEE? I
CLOSURE PLAN COMNENTS/ISSUES (CRUCIBLE STEEL) gaS 1984)05 1 09/19/94
FINANCIAL REEPONSISILITY
(See also Closure Proceaa. Post-C losure) REEF / /
•CORRSCTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAl. RESPONSIBILITY EEQUIRE?4SNT 9502 1986110) 05(01/86
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 9477 1981112) 11/01/87
‘FINANCIAl. ASSURANCE REQUERSI4EN7S 9477 1584109) 12/01/84
GENERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOE TANK SUNS 9483 1989(011 04/01/89
SUBSTLTUTIGN OP STATE FINANCIAL MECNAIIISN FOR EPA 9477 1983(04 1 09/01/83
ABILITY TO PASS THE RCRA FINAI(CIAL TSST FOE ENVIRONMENTAL OALIGATIO$S 9477 3994(06) 10/07/94
AUTNORITY TO ENFORCE 264 SUBPART N COMPLIANCE AT FACILITIES LOCATED ON STATE-OWNED LAND 9477 1984402 ) 01/30/84
CLARIFICAT ION OF CERTAIN FI(IANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PEEI4IItEO HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES UNDER ECRA 9477 3994(05 ) 08/19/94
FACILITYS OPERATING LIFE, OETERI4IWATIOI4 op 9477 1994 117) 12/03/84
FINANCIAl. ASSIJRR1CE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARIES 9502 1969101) 03/02/89
FINANCIAL ASSURAI4CE INSTRUMENTS 9477 1964(081 06/0E/84
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REGULATIONS RELATED TO BANKRUPTCY (LTV) 9477 1966(12) 07/21/86
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS - CERTIFYING CLOSURE 9411 1990)02) 05/28/90
LOSS OF FINAIICIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTEEI1I STATUS AND PERMIT ISSUANCE 9528 1985)091 11/27/85
PART B FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INFO REQ FOR OWNSRS/OPERATORS IN STATES WITH ONLY PHASE 1 AUTHORIZATION 9437 1902)01) 05/24/82
REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY OENERATING. STORING. AND MANIFESTING P001 0478 1986)Ola) 10/30/86
RISK RWTRI8TION GROUPS AND FINANCIAl. ASSURANCE REQUIEDIENTS 9471 00-5 11/13/87
Bond Ratings
ACCEPTABLE BOND RATENDS FOR USE IN SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST 9477 1969101) 05/36/89
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES 9477 19831031 12/09/83
TREED PAWN LETTERS OF CREDIT CONVERTIBLE BONDS 9473 1936 (16) 09/04/66
CorporAte Guarantee
CORPORATE GUARANTEE AS ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO MEET FiNANCIAl, REQUIREMENTS 9477 1988102) 01/03/86
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD STATEMENT 106 AND ITS AFFECTS ON TNE RCRA FINANCIAL TEST 9477 1994 (01) 04/01/94
GUIDANCE FOR FIBA3ICIAL TEST FOR SUBTITLE C TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9417 1997(01) 02/27/97
Coat Estimates
•AN)(UAL PAYMENTS INTO A STANOBY TRUST flnID WHEN USING A LEtTER OF CREDIT 9477 1996)03) 12/01/96
‘FINANCIAL ASSURANCE COST ADJUSTMENTS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS 9477 1984 (02) 06/03/94
‘FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS/CLOSURE COSTS 9471 1986(111 06/01/86
GNP V GDP FOR COST ADJUSTMENTS WIDER RCRA 9477 1994 (031 06/01/94
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO FACILITIES SEEKING A PERMIT UNDER 40 CER 264 9417 1994 (04) 07/25(94
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS 9477 L984 101) 01/12(84
FINANCIAL TEST (UNION CARBIDE. 3/86) 9477 1988(10) 08/25/B6
PETRQLII0I REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS 1990 (05) 10/17/90
FInancial Teat
PENANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIREMENT FOE 7118 ECRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST 9417 1996(011 11/01/96
‘TANGIBLE NETWDRT1( REQUIREMENTS FOR RCRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 9471 1996)02) 12/01/96
GUIDANCE FOR FINANCIAL TEST FOR SUBTITLE C TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9477 1997 (01) 02/27/ 97

-------
07/ 16/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page (10. 44
Inat&rance
‘LIABI LITY INSURANCE FOR ACCIDENTAL AND SUDDEN ACCIDENTAL OCCURRENCES
• LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS
TERMINATLON OF INSURANCE
CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES TO COMPLY WITH LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. CREATION OF
CERTIF1CATIONS OF LIABILITY INSURANCE. NW FACILITY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAIRMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE
EXCLUSIONS FOR PEE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON
INSURANCE COVERAGE LIMITS
LIABILITY REGULATIONS
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
9471 1984(08) 11(01 (84
9471 1986(03) 02/01/96
9471 1983(02) 02/01(83
9477 1986(04) 03/20(86
9471 1982(03) 10/07(82
9471 1984 (06) 11/28/94
9471 10-6 11/23/87
9477 1984(04) 11/20/84
9471 1986 (09) 07/24/96
9411 00-5 11/23/8?
9477 1988(04)
9471 1986)09)
9471 1986)03)
9411 1987(15)
947? 1986(04)
9477 1986(13)
9451 1986 (01)
9477 1997(02)
9477 1988(01 )
9477 1987(10)
9477 1987(09)
9477 1986(10)
9433 1985 (04)
9441 1986(09)
947? 1987(03)
9477 1986(09)
9477 1987(01)
9432 1987(12)
9522 1985(05)
9477 1993 (01)
9441 1986(51)
9451 1991401)
9477 1983(01)
9477 1987(11)
10/01/ 88
03 /01/86
02/01/86
06 /0 1/07
03 /20/86
01/15/86
03/17/86
04/30/9?
0 2/25/88
11/10/ 87
11/10/8 7
06/25(86
10/23/89
01/28/86
04/01/8?
07/24/8 6
03/02/87
10/28/87
12/13/85
10/04/93
07/03/86
03 / 13/91
01/0 5/83
* 1/10/87
FLA IE4ABLE
(See Financial Responsibility)
XREF / /
(See Characteristic Nazardous Waste)
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT
XREF / /
Liability
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
‘FINANCIAL TEST LIABILITIES
•LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS
•LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSIDIARIES
CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES TO COMPLY WITH LIABILITY COVERAGE REOUIREMENTS. CREATION OF
CORPORATE GUARANTEE FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE
EFFECTS OF THE EI4ALL OUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
EPA’S INTERPRRTATION OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE
EECLUS1ONS FOR PEE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES
FACILITIES UNABLE TO MEET LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR LIABILITY THROUGN RISX RETENTION GROUP
FINANCIAL. TEST (UNION CARBIDE, 3/86)
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELIBTED WASTE RELEASES
WOUSENOLD NAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF
LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS WITS RESPECT TO LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
LIABILITY REGULATIONS
LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES ACTIVELY SEEXINO A ECU PERMIT
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER ECU AND CEECLA. DEFINITION OF
PERMIT ISSUES REGARD1NO ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIIED BED INCINERATION
POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHEN DISPOSING OF CONTAMINATED DEBRIS
RECYCLABLE CLOTN WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED ID CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (EQG) REQUIREMENTS AND LIABILITIES
SUBPART N FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY EEQUIRRMENTS
TNIRO-PARTY LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
L I ebility Coverage
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
‘FINANCIAl. REQUIREMEI(TS FOR INACTIVE SURFACE iMPOUNDMENTS
‘TANGIBLE NETWORTN REQUIREMENTS FOR RCRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
BODILY INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE CLAIMS AT TSDFs
EPA’S INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FINANCIAL TEST
9477 1988 (06) 13/01/88
9477 1985(02) 01/01/85
9477 1996(02) 12/01/96
9477 1990(011 01/25/90
9477 1991(02) 04/30(97
9477 00-9 11/23/87
XREF / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 45
•POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOCATED IN A 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 9484 1984(02) 12/01/84
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) XREF / /
FORMALDEHYDE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) XREF / /
FOSSIL FUELS
(See Mining Waste, cclusions( XREF / /
FREE LIQUIDS
(See Land Disposal Reetrictions. Paint Filter Teat) (See also SW-846) EREF / /
FREON
(See Hszerdoua Waste Identification) XREF / /
FUEL
(See Hazardoua Waste Fuels, Use& Oil) XREF / /
FURNACE
(See Incineration) XREF / /
GAS CONDENSATE
(See Land Disposal Facilities) XREF / /
GAS PROCESSING WASTES
XREF / /
PNDSPNATE AND GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY WASTES 9443 i983)04) 07/05/83
GASEOUS EMISSIONS
(Sea Exclusions) XREF / /
GENERATORS
(See also Hazardous Waste Identification, Import. Export of Hazardous Waste) XREF / /
•BURNIHG/BLEHDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL 9442 1985(01) 12/01/85
GENERATOR AT NAVAL VESSEL OPERATIONS 9432 1985)02) 05/01/eS
•GEHERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1989(01) 04/01/89
•GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES FACILITY OWNER/OPERATOR OR MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT OPERATOR 9453 1984 (03) 12/01/84
•NAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR BA DFERY RECLAMATION 9497 198S(Ola) 05/01/86
LAB PACKS AT GENERATOR SITES 9453 1988(02) 01/01/58
•TRANSFER FACILITY AS CENTRAL COLLECTION POINT 9461 1991(01) 11/01/91
•TREATABILITY STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 9441 1986(58) 08/01/86
•TREATRENT IN A GENERATOR’S 90-DAY CONTAINMENT BUILDING 9451 1992(01) 08/01/92
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 9592 1994 (OS) 07/11/94
APPLICABILITY TO THE MIXING OF PAINT AND COATINGS TEAT HAVE SEPARATED IN THE CONTAINER AND EMPTY PAINT CANS 9441 1997(03) 04/11/97

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 46
ATON RArFERIE5, GENERATOR DEFINITION FOR 9453 1980(03) 02/25/88
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFINING SITES 9443 1986(16) 07/09/86
CLARIFICATION OF NOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO “SERVICE STATION DEALERS” THAT HANDLE USED OIL 9592 1994(12) 11/10/94
CLARIFICATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN RCRA REQUIREMENTS TO COMMON EXCAVATION-TYPE ACTIVITIES 9441 1992(16) 06/11/92
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL RULES AS THEY APPLY TO DO-IT-YOURSELF OIL CHANGERS 9592 1994(03) 04/08/94
CLARIFICATION ON THE AMOUNT, TYPE, AND FREQUENCY OF TRAINING REQUIRED FOR PERSONNEL HANDLING HAZARDOUS WASTE AT FACILITIES 9451 1993(02) 10/07/93
CO-GENERATOR POLICY AND EXCEPTIONS WNEN A GENERATOR IS DESIGNATED BY A MUTUAL AGREEMENT AMONG CO-GENERATORS 9451 1996(01) 03/12/96
CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR PROVISIONS 9441 1992(25) 08/25/92
EPA ’S CURRENT INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN 40 CFR SECTION 262 12 REGARDING EPA ID NUMBERS 9451 1995(01) 08/22/95
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS 9527 1988(03) 08/11/88
GENERATOR DETERMINATION-CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS 9451 1980(02) 11/18/80
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES 9433 1985(04) 10/23/85
GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9455 1985(01) 06/25/85
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIKU OF THE RP OR TCLP TESTS 9451 1986(03) 04/28/86
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS. DEFINITION 9432 1986405) 02/05/86
GUIDANCE ON WHETHER GENERATORS MUST POST “NO SMOKING” SIGNS WHEN A FACILITY HAS A “TOBACCO-FREE” POLICY 9472 1995(01) 06/08/95
LIABILITY OF A SERVICING COMPANY AS A GENERATOR OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9451 1980(01) 12/02/80
MICRO-CLEAR REGULATORY STATUS 9444 1990(02) 03/22/90
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR 9432 1986(13) 08/06/86
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SHIPPING RESTHICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FACILITY 9551 1987(20) 10/28/87
ON-BITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1986(21) 03/13/86
PERMIT ISSUER REGARDING ON-SITE THRATHENT BY FLUIDIZED BED IHCIHERATION 9522 1985(05) 12/13/85
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TRRA’ITIENT (WIT EXEMPTIONS 9522 1988(04) 11/02/88
PORT FACILITIES AS GENERATORS OF OILY WASTE 9451 1986(02) 03/17/86
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED OH SUCH VESSELS 9441 1986(65) 09/03/86
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES 9451 1989(01) 05/03/89
REGULATIOH AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES 9441 1988(39) 08/30/88
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITE AT DRY CLKANRRS 9471 1993(01) 06/02/93
REQUIREMENTS FOR CHANGING STATUS OF A TANK FROM TSD TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION 9453 1985)05) 12/03/85
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I 0 NUMBERS FOR 9441 1986 (05) 01/16/86
RESPONSIBILITY OF GENERATOR IN HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATIONS 9451 1984)02) 09/04/84
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION 9453 1989)07) 07/13/B9
SOLAR CELL AND HIGH TECH INDUSTRIES HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1983)03) 07/20/83
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 1986(89) 12/q2/86
SPENT CARBON REGULATION 9441 1987(37) 05/18/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATHENT FACILITY 9432 1987)10) 08/28/87
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS 9453 1991(02) 09/20/91
TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1988(44) 10/27/88
VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1987(11) 12/21/87
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION 9494 1986(02) 03/19/86
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (WITS ARE NOT DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND MAY NOT RECEIVE OFF-SITS HAZARDOUS WASTES 9452 1987(01) 02/24/87
Accumulation
“ACCUMULATION TIME FOR EXCESS OF 55-GALLON LIMIT IN SATELLITE AREAS 9453 1990(03) 10/01/90
•ACCUMULATION TIME FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTERS 9456 1992(01) 08/01/92
“ADDING ABSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS 9453 1990(02) 07/01/90
“CONTAINMENT RUILOINGS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS 9453 1994(01) 09/01/94
•GENERATOR ACCUMULATION AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1986(10) 11/01/86
GENERATOR AT NAVAL VESSEL OPERATIONS 9432 1985(02) 05/01/85
“GENERATOR SATELLITE ACCUMULATION/COUNTING REQUIREMENT 9453 1989(03) 08/01/89
“GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS 9453 1989(01) 04/01/89
“GENERATOR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PART 266, SUBPART F, PRECIOUS METALS 9496 1997(01) 04/01/97
“HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1986(07) 10/01/86
“INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WITHDRAWL 9453 1991(01) 06/01/91
“MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION 9441 1987(32) 04/01/87
•PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION 9441 1995(29) 00/01/95
“RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS 9453 1986(05) 08/01/86

-------
07 /06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 47
SATELLITE ACCUM uLATION 9453 1985(06) 12/01/85
•SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION 9441 1992 (04) 02/01/92
SQG ACCUMULATION 9493 1986(02) 04/01/86
TANE STORAGE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES 9461 1996(01) 06/01/96
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS 9453 1984(02) 05/01/84
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK 9483 1988(15) 07/01/88
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 9453 1986(01) 04/16/86
ACCUMULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN TANKS (90-DAY) 9453 1982(01) 08/31/82
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS DISPOSED OF 9441 1985 (25) 07/01/85
APPLICABILITY OF PART 279 USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE FLEET SERVICING OPERATION 9592 1994 (05) 06/10/94
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO CHEMICAL FLOCCULATION UNITS WNEN USED TO TREAT WASH WATER FROM AIRCRAFT ENGINES 9451 1996(08) 09/23/96
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO NAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED IN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS 9441 1995(09) 03/08/95
ATON BATTERIES, GENERATOR DEFINITION FOR 9453 1988(03) 02/25/88
CLARIFICATION OF TNE SATELLITE ACCUMULATION PROVISION FOR NAIARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS 9453 1993(01) 02/23/93
DETERMINING GENERATOR STATUS BY INCLUDING WASTES COLLECTED AT SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREAS 9451 1994(01) 02/10/94
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMDVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1987(03) 05/01/87
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 90-DAY ACCUMULATORS OF DIOXIN CONTAINING WASTES 9453 1985(02) 03/12/85
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS 9441 1987(96) 12/10/87
EXTENSION TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME LIMITS FOR UNFORESEEN. TEMPORARY CIRCUMSTANCES 9453 1987(05) 08/12/87
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY 9441 1987(13) 03/04/87
GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME REQUIREMENTS 9453 1989(05) 04/21/89
GENERATOR MANAGEMENT OF HAEARDOUS WASTE AND THE 90-DAY TEEATMENT EXEMPTION 9451 1993(03) 11/01/93
GENERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE 9453 1987(04) 07/14/87
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SNIPS, DEFINITION 9432 1986(05) 02/05/86
INCINERATOR RESIDUES/RECYCLING DEFINED/ACCUMULATION 9551 1989(06) 05/03/89
INTERPRETATION OF GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1996(06) 05/01/96
LIARILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9451 1986(07) 03/24/86
MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN QUANTITIES LESS THAN 100 KG AND THOSE THAT ARE THROWN AWAY WITH ORDINARY GARBAGE 9451 1996(05) 05/01/96
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER 9441 1986(73) 09/25/86
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1986(21) 03/13/66
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262 34 9453 1987(03) 07/01/87
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF 9453 1987(08) 12/15/87
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS 9453 1986(04) 07/25/86
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1986(53) 07/03/86
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING 9441 1986(01) 01/06/k
REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO GENERATORS WHO ACCUMULATE WASTE IN CONTAINERS AT OR NEAR THE POINT OF GENERATION 9451 1996(04) 05/01/96
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS, VEHICLES, VESSELS. PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITE. OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN 9441 1995(15) 04/20/95
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9502 1987 (OS) 04/02/87
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA AND REGULATIONS 9453 1987(01) 02/22/87
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION PROVISION. CLARIFICATION 9453 1989(08) 08/02/89
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 1986(89) 12/02/86
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY 9441 1988(19) OS/26/88
STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT 9453 1989(04) 04/18/89
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATIGN PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY 9432 1987(10) 08/28/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1967 (01) 03/17/87
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262 34 9453 1966(07) 12/05/86
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS 9453 1986(08) 12/22/86
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS 94S3 1987(02) 03/25/87
USED OIL FILTERS. REGULATORY DETERMINATION 9442 1990(05) 10/30/90
Bienntal RBpD TLB
•AMENDMENTS TO PART 262 HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS 9451 1991(02) 03/01/91
•BIENNIAL REPORTING FOR WASTES TREATED IN EXEMPT UNITE 9454 1994(02) 06/01/94
•FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS 9451 1996(02) 05/01/96
•RCRA WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS 9561 1995)01) 06/01/95
BIENNIAL REPORTS 9454 1984 (01) 03/30/84
CLARIFICATION OF NOW MANIFEST AND BIENNIAL REPORTING APPLIES TO MIXTURES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9452 1993(02) 04/29/93

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page NC. 48
CI RIFICAT1ON OF REQUIREMENTS INVOLVING THE COUNTING OF WOOD PRESERVING WATERS FOR BIENNIAL REPORTING 9452.1996(01) 06/04/96
DOES TNE UNIVERSAL WASTE FINAL RULE SUBJECT CERTAIN WASTE TYPES TO SUBSTANTIVE HAZARIIOUS WASTE REGULATIONS 1996(01) 04/17/96
STATE/REGIONAL BIENNIAL REPORTS 9454 1986(05) 08/13/06
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING 9452 1906(03) 02/06/06
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING 9452 1986 (03) 02/06/06
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
•FREOUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR REOUIRRNmFrE 9451 1996(02) 05/01/96
MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS 9451 1996(07 1 07/12/96
MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN QUANTITIES LESS THAN 100 KG AND THOSE THAT ARE THROWN AWAY WITH ORDINARY GARBAGE 94S1 1996 OSI 05/01/96
DOT
GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS 9461 1989(02) 04/01/09
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOE EXPORTED WASTES 9455.1994(01) 12/01/94
‘TANK STORAGE Al TRANSFER FACILITIES 9461 1996(01 ) 06/01/96
SULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SNIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT hAZARDOUS CODES 9461 1985(01) 09/19/05
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE. REQUIREMENTS 9402 1906 )01) 01/21/86
DOT’S ROLE IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9463 19001011 06/10/00
LABELING OF STEEL DRUMS NEED NOT INCLUDE PREVIOUS CONTENTS 9453 1907)071 11/17/07
LABORATORIES. RCRA REGULATION IMPACT 9441 1990)32) 11/20/90
STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES MID TNE AUTHORIZATION OF STATES REGULATING THIS STORAGE 9461 1994 (02) 08/17/94
UNIFORM MANIFEST FORM, USE OF CONTINUATION SHEET 94S2 1907(02) 04/30/87
Man ife St
‘DOT MANIFEST REQUIRRNE9ITE 9461 1967 (05) 09/01/67
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS 9451 1996)02) IS/01/96
‘GENERATORS AND DESIGNATED TRANSPORTERS 9462 1996)01) 03/01/96
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS 9551 1900)04) OS/O k/O S
‘MAINTAINING COPIES OF MANIFESTS AND BIENNIAL REPORTS 9475 1904 (01) 04/01/84
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION OF SPENT SOLVENTS 9541 1905 (07) 15/01/OS
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS AND THE OFF-SITE DEFINITION 9452 1989(02) 09/01/49
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9452 1985(01) 06/01/05
‘MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS 9462 1987(021 10/01/87
‘MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA IDENTIFICATION NIR4BERS 9452 1990(011 02/01/90
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPORTED WASTES 9455 1994 (01) 12/01/94
‘PRECIOUS METAL RECYCLING (SILVER), SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1985)20e 1 07/01/05
‘RECORDING STATE-REGULATED WASTES ON TNE UNWM 9452 1904)03) 11/01/04
‘500 100-1000 Eg/I4ONTN GENERATORS. AND THE MANIFEST I90S)02) 10/01/os
‘STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING 9475 1907 (01) 04/01/07
‘WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION ‘ 9475 1985(01) 09/01/OS
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDAEDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 1988)05) 04/11/06
BRASS DROSS SXI)OIINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES, BY-PRODUCT 9441 1905(21) 06/06/OS
CLARIFICATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES INITIATING EPA’S ‘MANIFEST DISCREPANCY’ PROCEDURES 1995(01) 09/14/95
CI.ARIFICATION OF NOW MANIFEST AND BIENNIAL REPORTING APPLIES TO MIXTURES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 94S2 1993(02) 04/29/93
CLARIFICATION OF TWO SECTIONS OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION IN 41 CFR 262 11 AND LDR NOTIFICATION 94S2 1996(02) 08/19/98
CLARIFICATION ON MAN iFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. FOD3, FOOS, 0001, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING. AND TREATHENT STANDARDS FOR CFC 9441 1994 126) 09/20/94
CONSOLIDATION OF SEIPMENTS AND MIXING DF HAZARDOUS WASTE BY TRANSPORTERS 9461 1903)01) 01/30/03
DESIGNATED FACILITY UNDER THE TBRATABILITY STUDY EXCLUSION 9432 1991(01) 09/27/
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION 94SS 1991)01) 02/OS/91
FEDERAL POLICY ON SEVERAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE USE OF THE WAIARDOUS WASTE MA3IIFEET RY HAZARDOUS WASTE ‘TRANSPORTERS 9462 1996)01) 03/07/96
GENERATION OF AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON BATtERIES) 9461 1907(03) 07/30/87
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS FOR RESIDUES GENERATED PROM THE TREA’IMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9442 1986(01) Dl/i6/8
INTERPRETATION OF GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SETE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1995(06) OS/01/96
LABELING OF STEEL DRUMS NEED NOT INCLUDE PREVIOUS CONTENTS 9453 1987(07) 11/17/87
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF 9494 1906(01) 02/09/06
MIXED EOLVENT WASTES 9444.1980(03) 01/30/89
MIXING LOW AND NION FlU WASTES - SHAM BURNING. BLENDING, MANIFESTING 9442 1987(04) 00/31/87

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 49
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES 9441 1907(60) 00 1 19/07
MIXTURES OP WASTES AND LEGITIMATE EURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 1907(03) 00/31/07
MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9452 1906 (02) 10/20/06
RDSD PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A NASTEWATER sysiiii 9503 51- lA 12/24/OS
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES 9455 1991(03) 12/10/91
REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY GENERATING, STORING. AND MANIFESTING FOOl I906(Ola) 10/30/06
RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 40 CFR PART 262 REGARDING TRANSPORTATION OF RECYCLABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9462 1994(01) 11/09/94
RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND GENERATOR REGULATIONS 9452 1993(03) 10/20/93
EMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR REGULATIONE APPLICABILITY TO LABORATORIES 9441 1905(34) 10/31/05
STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES AJO) TEE AUTNDRIZATION OF STATES REGULATING ThIS STORAGE 9461 1994(02) 00/17/94
TRANSFER FACILITY REGULATION INTERPRETATION 9461 1990(02) 10/30/90
TRANSPORTATION OF LEAD-aCID BATTERY COMPONENTS THAT ARE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR RECLAMATION 9497 1997(01) 05/30/97
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS 9452 1991(01) 07/26/91
UNIFORM MANIFEST FORM, USE OF CONTINUATION SNEET 9452 1907 (02) 04/30/07
USE OF AUTOMATED INFORMATION TECNNOLOOIES IN WE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST SYSTEM 9452 1996 (03) 11/12/96
USING A GENERATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND/OR MANIFEST TO DETERMINE LIARILITY 9451 1994(02) 03/04/94
VIOLATION OF SPA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST REGULATIONS BY FEDERAL FACILITIES 9452 1904(02) 10/25(04
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING 9457 1906(03) 02/06/06
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9452 1906(01) 04/20/06
WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3002(b ) OF RCRA FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9561 1994 (01) 07/10/94
Small Quantity Generator
‘100-1000 Kg/NOSTN GENERATORS 94S1 1907 (04) 00/01/01
‘CARBON FILTERS IN DRY CLEANING FOR FILTERING PERCNLOROETNYLENE 9444 1904 05) 14/01/04
‘CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS 9453 1994)01) 09/01/94
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS 9451 1996 (02) 05/01/96
‘INTERIM STATUS 9521 1906 ( GSa) 15/01/06
‘INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQG WASTE 9520 1906(06) 17/01/06
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS 9SS1 1980(04) 15/0 1/ 08
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFINIT 1ONS 9551 1906(23) 12/01/06
•MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9452 1905(01) *6/01/05
‘PARTS WASNING WITh MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9441 1906(45) 05/01/06
‘PRECIOUS METAL RECYCLING (SILVER), SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 19 05(aoa) 07/0 1 105
‘RCRA WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS 9561 1995(01) 06/01/95
‘SATELLITE ACCUMULATION STANDARDS FOR SQGa 1990(01) 04/01/90
‘SMALL QUANTITY DETERMINATION FOR SOLVENT RECLAIMER 9441 1907(10) 02/01/07
SGG 100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS. AND THE MANIFEST 1905(02) 10 (01/es
‘SQG ACCUMULATION 9453 1906(02) 04/01/66
‘SQO QUANTITY DETERMINATION, MULTIPLE COUNTING EXEMPTION 9441 1906(64) 00/01/06
‘WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES 9441 1907(31) 04/01/01
AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON) BA1’TERIES AND RCRA REQUIREMENTS 94S1 1907)03) 07/30/81
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS. TO THE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CUTER 9441 1994(30) 11/23 (94
COUNTING DRY CLEANING INDUSTRY WASTE ONLY AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - EGG RULE 9441 1906(67) 09/00/36
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON 1907)20) 09/03/07
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACNLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF 9451 1906(06) 12/15/06
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 9451 1906(01) 03/17/80
GENERATOR I 0 NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, ASSIGNING 94S1 1903(02) 09/30/03
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS 9441 1993(14) 09/01/93
NOUSENOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS. CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF 9441 1906(09) 01/20/06
NOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE 9574 1991(01) 05/30/91
NSWA PRONIBITIGN ON TEE SE OP RAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 00- IA 05/31/06
[ N’TERPRETATION OF GENERATOR RIQUIRRMENTE AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1996(16) 05/01/96
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 1905(03) 07/31/85
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS 1907(20) 11/20/87
MANAGENENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS 9451 1996(07) 07/12/96
MERCURY DRY CELL BATYERIEE AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9443 1906(10) 09/04/06
MOOSFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9452 1906(02) 10 120/06

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page ND. 50
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION 9441 1907(04 ) 01/13/07
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1986(21) 03/13/06
PAINT FILTER WASTE 9444 1902(01) 09/15/02
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATUR 9441 1906(47) 06/02/06
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SOC TREATMENT FACILiTIES 9522 1905(06) 12/28/05
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1980(04) 11/17/Ed
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS SUEJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 94 1994(01) 05/09/94
RECYCLAELE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1996(53) 01/03/06
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE 9442 1993 (05) 12/23/91
SCRAP AI4ALGAJI FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF 9441 1999(22) 05/17/09
SCRAP DENTAL AMALGAM 9441 1999(43) 09/17/99
SMALL QUANTITIES OF WASTE GENERATED RY LARGE NUMBERS OF GENERATORS 9451 1997(02) 02/19/07
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (SQG) REQUIREMENTS AND LIABILITIES 9451 1991401) 03/13/91
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR APPLIES ‘ID AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF WASTES GENERATED AT A FACILITY 9441 1990(OS) 11/17/90
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR REGULATIONS APPLICABILITY TO LABORATORIES 9441 1995(34) 10/31/OS
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS 9441 1996(25) 03/26/96
SQG COMPLIANCE WITH ‘It RULE 9441 1990(261 09/20/90
It RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL 9451 1991(03) 04/16/91
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PRGVIS1ONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY 9432 1997(10) 08/29/97
TEANSPORTIHG WASTES FROM CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9451 1993 (01) 09/20/93
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262 34 9453 19061071 12/05/06
TRRA’I74BNT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 1W PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 9441 1996 (621 08/19/06
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL 9442 1991(191 12/19/91
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9452 1996(01) 04/29/96
Uns reitie a
GENERATOR 1 0 NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, ASSIGN1NG 9451 1993(021 09/30/63
GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES
(See Subpart X, Land Oiapoeal Facilittee) XREF / /
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
(Sea alao Poat-Clo.ure) XREF / /
‘APPENDIX VIII GROUNDWATER MONITORING 9445 1987(01) 03/01/87
•HAEARDOUS WASTE TANKS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING 9493 1986(04) 08/01/86
LABCRATORY AUDIT INSPECTION 9431 1907(03) 07/01/87
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CNEMICALS, PROPOSED 9461 1986(02) 07/25/96
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER. REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF 9491 1905(01) 10/15/05
CLOEURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476 1987 (09) 12/17/87
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD 9476 00-13 02/09/88
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE 9480 00-14 03/13/97
CONOCO’S NO-MIGRATION PETITION DENIAL 9433 1990(04) 09/24/90
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AIC VDLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF 9441 1986 (96) 11/20/86
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. REGULATORY STATUS OF 9528 1987(02) 03/11/87
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY, NO SUPPORT 9502 1996(19) 10/07/66
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1985(05) 11/27/89
DELISTIHG PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 9433 1997(21) 09/29/87
DELISTIHG, INTERIM STATUS. AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U S NAMEPLATE COMPANY 9433 1907(03) 02/25/87
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES 9486 1960(01) 01/02/88
RHFDECING GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN RCRA PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9504 1964(01) 08/16/84
P006 WASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1987(09) 06/08/87
GC/MC RATHER THAN GC FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING PURPOSES 9481 1986 (09) 09/26/06
GROUNDWATER CONTAI4IHATION AS A BABIS TO DENY A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1901 (09) 04/24/87
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMUa THAT HAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER 9481 1981 (05) 06/17/87
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE 9476 1985402) 08/27/85

-------
07/06/98 Page No 51
OWN DATA IN PART B APPLICATIONS 9523 1984 (07) 09/10/84
E035 LISTING AND CELISTING ISSUES GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1987127) 12/13/87
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS . GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS 9484 1986(03) 04/09/86
POST-CLOSW(S PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 9476 1905(04) 09/25/85
QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PERFORM ENVIRONMENTAL RW4EDIATION TASKS 9502 1994(011 09/14/94
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTES) 944S 1985(04) 06/30/85
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACNLOROPNENOL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER 9444 1986(05) 03/03/86
SULFIDE REACTIVIr4 CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1985(04) 07/16/85
SU)04ARY OP ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMItTING COMMENTS 9523 00-17 09/02/88
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-15 03/30/88
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE. APPLICABILITY OF 3005(t) OF RCRA it 9476 1987(01) 06/09/87
TIME OF TRAVEL METHOD FOR THE GUIDANCE CRITERIA POE IDENTIFYING AREAS OF VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY 9472 1986(06) 07/08/86
VULNERABLE NYDRDOKOLOOY GUIDANCE CRITERIA 9481 1987(03) 06/03/87
Alternate Concentretson Limit (ACL)
ACLe APPLIED TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITtING PROVISION 3005(7 1 (3) 9484 1987(08) 07/14/87
ACLa PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP • INSTITUTE. WV, COMMENTS ON 9481 1987(04) 06/19/87
ACLS UNDER ThE RCRA AND CERCLA PROORJMS. USE OF 9481 1986(06) 08/06/86
ALTNMNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (AC) .) POLICY FOR NSWA PROVISIONS 9481 1987(07) 07/24/87
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLE IN DRAFT ESWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY) 9481 1987(02) 03/10/87
INTEMPRETATION OF THE RCRA GROUNDWATER MONITORING REGULATIONS 9481 1997(01) 02/26/97
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) CGI’94ENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/96
Aquifer
‘AQUIFER. DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT YIELD IN 9432 1984 (06) 11/01/84
AQUIFER AND UPPERMOST AQUIFER. DEFINITION OF 9431 1984 (Dl) 09/10/84
METAL. EIS1 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNOMENT-DELISTING PETITION 9433 1987(18) 08/07/37
SI584ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TRAM (PAT) COI’94ENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/86
UPPERMOST AQUIFER IN FILL, IDENTIFICATiON OF 9481 1986(01) 05/15/86
Aeeeeee’ent Monitoring
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT MONITORING/CORRECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSED (NTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9481 1988 (02) 04/01/88
OWN DEFICIENCIES IN PART B’e. RESPONSES TO AND MECNANISMS TO PREVENT 9504 1984 (02) 11/29/84
Compliance Monitoring
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING 9481 t985(OIa) 02/01/85
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PERIOD/POST-CLOSURE CARE PERIOD 9481 1988(03) 04/01/88
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESAIIPLING REQUIREMENTS 9481 1992 (02) 06/01/92
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING. DEFINITION 9481 1985(04) 10/30/85
Detect ion Monitoring
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING APPENDiX IX SAMPLING AND OFF-SITE RELEASES 9481 1997(02) 03/01/97
RESAMPLINO AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING NOTIFICATION REGUIREMENTS 9481 1996(01) 10/01/96
Groundwater Stenderde
‘GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS 9481 1985(Olb) 04/01/85
ACLe PROPOSED BY UNION CARSIDE CORP • INSTITUTE. WV, COMMENTS ON 9481 1987(04) 06/19/87
ACLe UNDER THE RCRA AND CERCLA PROGRAMS. USE OF 9481 1986(06) 08/OS/RE
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT CACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS 9481 1987 (07) 07/24/8 ’
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDASDS/ACL.e IN DRAFT MSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY) 9491 1987(021 01/10/87
INTERPRETATION OF THE RCRA GROUNDWATER MONITORING REGULATIONS 9481 1997(01) 02/26/97
Nydrogeological Date
ACLa PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP • INSTITUTE. WV, COMMENTS ON 9481 1987(04) 06/19/87
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY 9433 1590(06) 11/27/90
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE 9481 1987(01) 02/25/87

-------
07/06/98 REWORD INDEX Page No 52
Monitoring
‘COIIPLIANCE TO DETECTION GROUNDWATER MONITORING. CHMCE p 9481 1985(06) 12/01/85
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 9481.1985(Ola) 02/01/85
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT NEWLY REGUlATED FACILITIES 9481 1992(01) 04/01/92
GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR RADIONUCLIDES 9481 1987 )06) 06/at/a,
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS 9481.1985 )011,) 04/01/95
FIBER OPTICS FOR IN-SITU MONITORING 9502 1987)09) 09/03/87
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1990 (13) 11/08/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS. WA 955) 1990(09) 10/24/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATI.ANTIC REPINING & MARKETING. PA 9551 1991 (06) 04/22/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING. OE 9551 1991(05) 02/05/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX 9551 1991(12) 12/10/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH ’S REFINiNG. U 9551 1991(01) 01/03/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM. IL 9551 1990 (09) 11/06/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SNELL OIL. WA 9551 1990(11) ii/0’/90
MO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK 9551 1990(12) 11/08/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE. DE 9551 1990(10) 11/07/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING. OK 9551 1991(02) 01/17/91
Etudeflta T Teat
ANALYSIS OF RETESTING PROCEDURES PAPER 9481 1991 (01) 10/16/91
THERMAL TREATHENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART 9489 1988(01) 05/18/88
Unaaturated tone Monitoring
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS flfl 00- 12 03/3I/87
VHS Model
COMBINATION OF SLUDGES FROM ALL IMPOUNDMENTS TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSIS 9433 1987)07) 04/13/97
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA S MOBILE INCINERATOR 1986 )21) 12/11/86
DELISTING PETITION. USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1985)05) 11/37/95
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REOUIREMENTS 9433 1987(21) 09/28/07
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON 9433 1997)20) 09/03/17
DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION BASED ON EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 1997(05) 03/19/97
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMFOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION 9433 1986(19) 12/09/86
P006 WASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR 1997(09) 06/08/07
E103/E104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS. BOAT. AND DELISTING CRITERIA 9433 1997(06) 04/Oh/U ’
RECONSIDERATION OP DELISTING DENIAL BASED ON USE OF VHS. TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD. AND MCL 1906(08) 03/24/86
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS. USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1997(25) 10/26/87
Well ConatruCtion
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION 9481 1995(05) 10 101/95
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES 9481 1996(04) 07/01/06
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS
(See Groundwater Monitoring) IREF / /
GUIDANCE
XREF / /
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS 9476 00-10 05/12/09
GUIDANCE PROM THE U S EPA ON TEE CRUSHING OF MERCURY-CONTAINING LAMPS 9441 1995(21) 06/05/95
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES 9498 1994 (041 07/05/94
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE (RIDER 40 CFR 260 31(b) FOR SPENT CATALTSTS 1994(021 11/15/94

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 53
HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE AMENDMENTS (NSWA)
(See also Corrective Action, Deflating, Joint Perniatting under State Authonsation, Land Disposal Reatrict lons,Laachate Collection)
•ENFORCEMENT USING 3008(h) AUTHORITY AND 3013 ORDERS
•EXISTING PORTION, DEFINITION AND NSWA IMPACT
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DELISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED
EXISTING UNITS UNDER NSWA-APPLICABILITY OF ICR TO EXPANSIONS
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE
NSWA EFFECT ON STATS DELISTING DECISIONS
NSWA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS
IMMEDIATE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
INTERPRETATION OF 3005)j)(l)
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUID WASTSWATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND HSWA, DISPOSAL OF
PARTIAL PERMITTING OF INCINERATOR UNIT (DOW)
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
STAYING NSWA PERMIT CONDITIONS
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
WASTE MINIMIZATION. PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER NSWA, MANAGEMENT OF
NSWA Provision.
LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
EFFECT OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON PERMITS
NSWA AUTHORIZATION ISSUES - JOINT PERMITTING
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELISTINGS AND NSWA EFFECTS ON BOTH
HAZARDOUS CONSTIT uENTS
(See also Appendix VIII, Appendix IX, Corrective Action, Delisting)
DELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4, S-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
K035 LISTING AND DZLI5TING ISSUES GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
RELISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING NSWA REOUIRRMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
WASTES CONTAINING FOOl - FOGS CONSTITUENTS
HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTOR
(See Incineration)
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS
(See also Burning and Blending, Uasd Oil)
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BURNING AND BLENDING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND USED OIL FUELS
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION IN 261 4(b)(4), FUEL MIXTURES
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
K051 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF CEMENT PRODUCED USING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS
REGULATORY STATUS OF TREATMENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL-BLENDING ACTIVITIES
XREF / /
9SG2 1986(18) 09/01/86
9432 1985(05) 08/01/85
9476 1988 (01) 01/29/88
9432 1985(04) 08/30/85
9476 1985(02) 08/27/BS
9433 1985(02) 05/16/ES
9480 198S(01) 04/01/85
9501 1984(01) 11/09/84
9484 1985(01) 07/25/85
9574 198S(01) 01/22/85
9522 198S(04) 08/30/85
9502 1987(06) 06/10/87
9521 1988(03) 12/09/88
9484 1987(12) 11/25/87
9560 1985(01) 09/11/85
9541 1985(05) 05/06/85
9484 1992(01) 07/01/92
9541 1986(13) 06/24/86
9551 1986(15) 09/15/86
9541 1985(09) 07/01/85
9494 1987(02) 04/1S/87
9433 1986)14) 05 127/86
1987(26)
1987 (27)
1986(08)
1986 (23)
1988(05)
XREF
9433
9433
9442
9433
9441
XREF
1 /
10/28/87
12/11/87
08/21/86
12/30/86
02/22/88
/ /
//
04/11/86
12/12/85
09/03/87
07/22/ 87
01/13/81
04/15/87
07/ 30/8 5
08/31/87
10/17/94
11/02/93
01/28/94
XR8F
9494 1986(05)
949S 1985(03)
9528 1987(10)
9489 1987)02)
9441 1981(01)
9494 1987(02)
9494 1985(02)
9494 1987(03)
9521 1994 (01)
9441 1993(22)
9494 1994 (01)

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 54
9494 1986 )03)
9454 1986(01)
9441,1986 (87)
9453 1985(04)
9453 1985(04)
9441 1987(76)
9432 1986(02)
9441 1986(95)
9495 1986 109)
9495 1988 105)
9495 1986 (20)
9495 1956 (03)
9441 1986(37)
9441 1907(98)
9494 1986(06)
9495 1986(08)
9528 1986(10)
9494 1985(01)
9494 1986)01)
9495 1986)04)
9441 1987)48)
9495 1987(01)
9441 1996(19)
9441 1986(22)
9441 1986(41)
9432 1986 (04)
9461 1990(02)
9495 1986(02 1
9441 1984(30)
9495 1986(21)
9441. 1986(11)
9494 1986 (02)
9441 1986(081
03 /0 1/86
03/01/86
11/01/ 86
11/01/85
11/01/85
09/15/87
01/03/86
12/23/86
04/21/86
03/05/86
11/12/86
02/13/86
05/01/86
12/24/87
12/31/ 86
04/08/8 6
11/13/86
10/01/85
02/09/86
02/28/86
08/19/87
0 1/20/87
03/08/86
03 / 19/86
05/20/86
01/21/86
10/30/90
01/11/86
10 /2 2/84
09/15/86
02/1/86
03/19/86
0 1/24/86
10/01/91
09/23/91
03/29/91
04/15/87
0 1/2 1/86
06/09/87
11/10/90
Fuel
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BROKERS
• HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
flIAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL MARKETERS
USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL, RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
SOILSRS AND INCINERATORS • DISTINCTION BETWEEN/ INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREIHOFTS
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES
BURNING USED OIL AND THE LEAD SPECIFICATION
BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE NEATEES. INDUSTRIAL FURNACES. AND BOILERS
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK SD’IWOMS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BEEN MIXED WITH USED OIL (l000ppai total halogens) (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REOUIREMENTE ‘I’O HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES. APPLIED
LUBRICATING DII, AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITN USED OIL (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
NOTIFICATION BY BURNERS OF USED OIL WHO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS- FUEL RULES
TRANSFER FACILITY REGULATION INTERPRETATION
USED OIL AND OIL BEABING HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED REFINERY PRODUCtS
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAIARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
USED OIL FIRED SPACE HEATERS
USED OIL INTROOUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER ))AZARDOIJS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEl, FRODUCTS EXEMPTION
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS. INFORMATION REQUIRED
Weate-Deriveil Fuel
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT EEOUIREMRNTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN RIFa
MINIMUM NEAT CONTENT REOUIRIMENTS OP WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN SIPs
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATRR CONDITIONER AND AS INGRSDIENT IN FERTI LIESR
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF
Wane-as-Fuel
SNAM RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED BIFS
BIF REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF E048-E052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FUENACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS -FUEL RULES
USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (E047) FROM WHICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WHICH IS USED AS A FUEL
URRD Oil, DRFIHITION APPLICABILITY TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
(See also Characteristic Hazardous Wane, Listed Nazardoua Waste)
‘BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITN USED OIL
‘DRIP GAS EXCLUSION
9494 1586(04) 04/13/86
9499 1994 (02) 05/20/94
9498 1994(11) 11/04/94
9493 1991(03) 01/08/91
9441 1986(80) 10/20/86
9494 1985(03) 10/11/85
9488 1991(05)
9488 1991 (03)
9494 1991(02)
9441 1987(24)
9431 1986(04)
9443 1987(42)
9441 1990(33)
XRSF / /
9442 1985(01) 12/01/85
9441 1989(05) 02/01/89

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 55
“DYES USED IN INK FORMULATION (K086) 9441 1990(19) 06/01/go
•EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042 1994(10) 12/01/94
F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE 9441 1907(11) 02/01/07
“FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 1906(16) 02/01/06
“GROUNDWATER “CONTAINED IN” POLICY 9441 1990(13b) 05/01/90
“HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL 9494 1906(03) 03/01/06
“HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BROKERS 9454 1986(01) 01/01/06
•NOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EXCLUSION GENERATED BY CONTRACTORS 9441 1990(09) 03/01/90
“REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREAI7IENT 95S4 1991(03) 04/01/91
“SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID 9441 1906(17) 02/01/06
“SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION 9441 1992(04) 02/01/92
“SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9441 1989(55) 10/01/09
“SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1906(14) 06/01/06
“TREATABILITY STUDIES SAMPLE EXEMPTION 9441 1909(56) 11/01/09
“WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9441 1907(77a) 09/01/07
“WASTEWATSR TREATHEHT UNITS REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE 9441 1992 (10) 06/01/92
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES 9442 1909 (04) 04/26/09
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 9592 1994(06) 07/11/94
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF 9441 1987(14) 03/06/87
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLOEIDE ARE NOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION 9456 1994(01) 12/16/94
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, ARA AND DOE INTERFACE 9441 1986(46) 06/02/86
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9441 1906(26) 04/02/86
CARBON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WHICH PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED 9444 1987(15) 05/18/87
CAUSTIC RINSING METAL PARTS 9444 1907(33) 00/07/87
CEMENT K)LH OUST WASTE 9441 1900(36) 07/29/80
CHLOROFLUOROCAREOH RECYCLING 9441 1900(32) 07/21/00
CHLOROFLUOROCARBOHS (CFCa) AS REFRIGEEAJfl’S. RECYCLING OF SPENT 9441 1909(40) 00/02/09
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS (CFCa) FROM PRODUCTION OF FOAM PRODUCTS 9441 1990(05) 02/26/dO
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIOHS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1994(13) 05/19fl4
CLARIFICATION OH WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME 9441 1994(25) 09/28/94
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD 9476 00-13 02/08/88
COM)4ERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT P LISTING APPLIES OHLY TO UNUSED PRODUCT, HOT USED RESIDUES 9444 1986(29) 12/08/86
CONTAINERS USED TO HOLD LISTED CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS 9441 1907(45) 06/16/87
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION FOR K062 9444 1987(318) 07/30/87
DEFINITION OF ECRA WASTE KOSO 9444 1994(04) 06/03/94
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACH ATE LEVELS 9433 1986(01) 01/07/86
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATHENT SLUDGE 9433 1991(01) 03/07/91
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1985(OS) 11/27/85
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES. STEEL INDUSTRY 9433 1984(06) 12/18/84
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS 9441 1987(03) 01/07/87
DEMOHSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS 9476 00-18 05/12/89
DENTAL AMALGAM DISPOSAL 9441 1909(31) 06/30/89
DEPLETED MIXTURES OF ETHYLENE GLYCOL AND WATER FROM HEAT EXCHANGERS 9441 1909(42) 08/04/09
DETERMINATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM 9441 1994(29) 11/09/94
DIMETHYL BEMZEHE-LISTING CLARIFICATION 9444 1990(03) 04/05/90
DINGSEB FORMULATIONS. REGULATORY STATUS 9441 1990(01) 02/09/90
DO RCRA REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE HANDLING, SHIPMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS’ 9441 1995(07) 02/28/95
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE HOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE 9441 1906(32) 04/21/86
DRYCLEANING INDUSTRY WASTES 9444 1907 (07) 03/06/87
ECOSCENT A & SCOSCEHT D 9443 1988(04) 03/14/00
ELECTRIC UTILITY POLES 9441 1990(21) 07/19/90
SLECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING 9444 1987(03) 01/27/07
SLECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN F006 LISTING 9444 1987(23) 06/30/87
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAIHSD COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 1985(41) 12/12/85
END-USERS OF CHLORDIMEFORJ4 EXEMPTION 9441 1990(04) 02/14/90
EHFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE ECRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS 1987(14) 07/20/07
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LI5TED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1989(30) 06/19/89

-------
07/06 /98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 56
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS 9441 1986(92) 1 1/08/fl
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR C hARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986(03) 01/07/86
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES RED GENERATOR ACCU)4ULATIDN PROVISIONS 9441 1987(96) 12/10/87
P003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS 9444 1987(30 ) 07/21/81
PODS LISTING FOR PYRIDINE STILL BOI ToMS 9444 1987(53) 12/15/87
P006 AND P019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS 9444 1986(09) 05/02,86
P006 LISTING AND DEFINITION OP CONVERSION TING 9444 1981(09) 03/26/81
P006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE ZINC PHOSPHATIND WASTEWATER TREAI?IENT SLUDGES 9444 1987(27) 07/06/il
P006 LISTING FOR PICKLiNG AND ETCHING WASTES hIND DELISTING ISSUES 9444 1987(55) 12/28/B?
P009 LISTING AND 0(5 MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS AND RESINS 9444 1987(31) 07/28/87
P021 LISTING FOR SUBSTANCES CONTAINING CHLOROPNENOLIC COMPOUNDS 1987(42) 09/23/87
P027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING 9444 1987(10) 04/09/87
FLOATING PLASTIC BALLS USED TO CONTROL VAPORS FROSt TANES CONTAINING LISTED PRODUCT 9444 1986(25) 11/03/fl
GASEOUS EMISSIONS PROM LANDPILLS 9487 1986(03) 03/06/86
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OP TNE EP OR TCLP TESTS 9451 1986(03) 04/28/86
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OP OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SNIPS . DEFINITION 9432 1986(05) 02/05/86
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE 9441 1986(83) 11/13/86
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED ISlE RECYCLING PROCESS 8441 1993 (14) 09/01/93
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES 9443 1993(01) 01/18/93
IRON CAEE WASTE GENERATSD DURING THE PRODUCTION OF METMYLDOPA 9443 1987 (32) 12/16/87
E035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES PROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS 9444 1987(521 12/11/87
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES. BEDDING. CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN 9444 1986(30) 12/10/86
LARD DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OP CYANIDES 9SS4 1991(01) 01/08/91
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET PUSLS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 9494 1985 101) 10/01/89
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS 1987 (40) 09/09/87
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9443 1986(18) 09/04/86
METAL PINISNIND SLUDGES 9444 1988(01) 01/11/68
MIXED RADIOACTIVE NOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION 9441 1986(94) 12/19/86
MIXTURE OP CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE• ASH FRDM INCINERATION 9441 1985(32) 10/07/ES
MIXTURES OP SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXNIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC 9441 1985(38) 11/20/85
MIXTURES OP WASTES AND LEGITIMATE EURlIIND FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9494 1987(03 1 08/31/67
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER. GENERATOR DETERMINATION POE 9432 1986(13) 08/06/86
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION. DISPOSAL OP RESIDUAL ASH 9443 1987(06) 04/08/87
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION 9441 1987(04) 01/22/87
PACKAGES CONTAINING RESIDUAL URETHANE COATING CHEMICALS 9443 1987(09) 05/13/87
PCB DECHLORINATION TREATMENT PROCESS 9441 1988147) 11/07/88
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL 9441 1990)15) 06/14/90
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER 9441 1988(42) 12/33/ES
PETROLEUM PACILITIES INCLUDED IN TNE E051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE 9444 1987(20) 05/26/87
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION AEN) 9441 1986 (31) 04/21/86
RAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND P-WASTES . HANDLING 9441 1989(50) 10/20/89
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUEION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS 9441 1986(65) 09/03/86
REACTIVE CNARACTERISTICS OP DISCHARGED Li/SO2 BATTERIES 9443.1987(05) 03/18/87
RECLAIMED MET)(ANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE 9441 1985(33) 10/23/kS
RECYCLABLE CLOTN WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 3986(53) 07/03/AS
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES 9441 1986(22) 03/19/86
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS. BATTERIES PEON DEFENSE DEPT SUPPLIES 9441 1986(85) 31/19/fl
RECYCLING EXCLUSION OP WASTES 9441 1990(06) 03/19/90
RECYCLING OP MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS 9441 19861011 01/06/86
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U 5 EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCM PACILITY 9444 1968(09) 03/11/BE
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS 9441 2992)22) 07/21/97
REGULATORY OETEEMINATIDN5 UNDER RCRA ON THE STATUS OP ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE 9444 1994109) 12/19/94
REGULATORY REOUIREMENTS FOE ON-SITE TREATMENT OP OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS bRA) CANISTERS 9441 1994110) 05/09/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP METAL CASINGS CONTAINING SPENT POWDERED METALLIC OXIDE CATALYST 9443 1994 101) 01/03/94
EELISTISIG NAZARDOUS WASTE 9442 1986 (08) 08/21/86
REQUIREMENTS OP A FACILITY GENERATING. STORING. AND MANIFESTING P001 94 75 1986(010) 10/30/66
RESIDUES GENERATED PROM THE TREATMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE. I D NUMBERS FOR 9441 1986(05) 01/16/46

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 57
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS. BURNING OP 8441 1986(04) si/a l/OS
RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC QUSST1ONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND GENERATOR REGULATIONS 9452 1993(03) 10/20/93
RINSE WATERS CONTAINING TCE SOLVENT 9441 1907(59) 00/07 107
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL. REGULATION OF LIQUiD 9443 1907(18) 08/19/07
SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL 9443 1907(04) 03/11/07
SCRAP DENTAL AMAlGAM 9441 1909(43) 05/17/09
SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY 9441 1909(29) 06/1S/89
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PNOTOGRAPNIC INDUSTRY 9441 1987(02) 01/06/87
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9444 1907(18) 05/20/07
SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE OP 9444 1986)26) 11/07/86
SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS 9444 1908)06) 03/31/08
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS 9444 1986)27) 12/05/86
SPENT ANTI-FREEZE COOLANT REGULATORY STATUS 9441 1990)26) 08/24/90
SPENT FLUIDIEED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUE 9444 1986)28) 12/05/86
SPENT ION EXCNANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1987)13) OS/OS/al
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. REUSE 9441 1987)17) 03/31/87
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES 9444 1988)03) 02/11/88
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER 9491 1985)02) 11/14/OS
STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY 9441 1990(16) 06/19/90
STATUS OF FACILITY WNERE A TEMPORARY DELISTING EXCLUSION WAS NEVER GRANTED 9433 1906(06) 03/10/06
STILL ROtION WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION 9444 1907(38) 09/01/07
STILL BOTTOMS FROM LISTED SOLVENT RECLAMATION 9444 1907(05) 02/02/87
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062) 9444 1987(47) 10/33/87
TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY DELISTED WASTES. REGULATORY STATUS 9413 1906(05) 02/24/86
TESTING OF USED FILTERS 9441 1994(09) 04/12/94
TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF TEE FIOS LISTING 9444 1907(36) 08/ 17/87
TRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A P0TH 9441 1986(88) i t/ lI/OS
USED K-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION 9441 1986(42) 05/20/86
VENICLE FILTERS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDES 9443 1987(16) 08/13/87
WASHWATERS GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS 9441 1906(44) 05/30/86
WASTE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE 9444 1907(16) 05/20/87
WASTE FROM RLECTROLESE PLATING PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED FOOS LISTING 1987(51) 12/04/87
WASTE LISTINGS FOOS AND K062, SCOPE OF 9444 1986(32) 12/12/86
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED FOOS LISTING 9444 1987(28) 07/13/87
WASTES FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMiSTRY LASORATORY 9444 1987(34) 00/07/87
WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARSON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM LOIS 9444 1987(14) 05/00/87
WASTEWATEE TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM 9441 1986(29) 04/09/06
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES CONTAINING METI(ANDL 9441 1989(S2) 10/06/09
WASTRWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE 9444 1987(39) 09/02/07
Aerosol Cans
AEROSOL CAN PUNCTURING. CRUSHING. OR SHREDDING. NON-EMPTY 9442 1989(071 09/12/09
AEROSOL CANE. ON-SITE DEPEES5URIZATION OF 9432 1900(04) 09/30/08
AEROSOL CANS. RCRA REGULATON OF 9432 1980(01) 12/30/00
DEFINITION OF THE C)(ASACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY AS IT PERTAINS TO AEROSOL CANS 9443 1997(01) 05/19/97
REGULATORY STATUS OP USED RESIDENTIAL MID COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS 9442 1993(021 10/07/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE AEROSOL CANS 9442 1994(011 01/04/94
Aobestoo
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1900(051 11/18/00
B B11SBt Fluid
BALLAST FLUID CLASSIFICATION 9444 1984 (07) 05/30/84
Batteries
REGENERATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 1994 (01) 11/01/94
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE 9S74 1991(011 05/30/91

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 50
LEAD-ACID BATTERY IMPROPER DISPOSAL 9497 1906(02) 07/11/06
MOVEMENT OF NICKEL CADMIUM BATTERIES FROM MEXICO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES 9452 1993 (01) ot/2o/ 3
PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION PROCEDURE FOR Tap SAMPLES OF DRY CELL BATTERIES 9442 1991 (071 05/29191
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES 9455 1991(03) 12/10/91
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERIES 9441 1993(24) 12/22/93
TNE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 9441 1995(31) 09/14/95
TRANSPORTATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERY COMPONENTS THAT ARE SHIPPED OFFSITB FOR RECLAMATION 1997 (01) 05/30/97
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR EEGENERATION EXEMPTION 1991 (01) 03/04/91
WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR ZINC-CARBON BATTERIES 9441 1993 (09) OS/06/91
WOULD REGENERATION EXEMPTION APPLY TO VARIOUS TYPES OF LOCATIONS AT WEICN LEAD-ACID BATTERIES ARE REGENERATED? 9441 1995(01) 01/12/95
Carbon Filters
‘CARBON FILTERS IN DRY CLEANING FOR FILTERING PERCNLOROETHYLENE 9444 1904 (05) 04/01/04
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS 9441 1986 (54) 07/15/06
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION 9444 1986(08) 05/02/BE
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS 9489 1991 (04) 00/02/91
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 9442 1907 (03) 07/20/87
Chemical Deodorants
DEODORANTS FOB PORTASLE TOILETS 9444 1904(001 06/06/84
FOEMALDENYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS 9441 1986(30) 05/01/06
Coeipreeaed Gas Cylinders
GASES VENTED FROM COMPRESSED CYLINDERS - TREATING OP FLUORINE AND OTHERS 9441 1984(36) 12/17/84
Contained- In
CLARIF1CATIGN OF THE ECRA CONTAINED-IN’ POLICY 9441 1995(321 09/15/95
EPA’S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES 9444 1995(01) 02/17/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL AND REUSE 9441 1989(03) 01/24/09
REGULATORY STATUS OF PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 9441 1989(02) 01/03/89
Contaminated Groundwater
“CLASSIFICATION OF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9554 1991(02) 01/01/91
•GROUIIDWATER “CONTAINED IN” POLICY 9441 1990(13b) 05/01/90
“NAZARDOUS WASTE I D 9441 1900(14) I4/q1/88
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA “CONTAINED-IN” POLICY 9441 1995132) 09/19/95
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS 9476 1991 (01) 05/02191
CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA - SOIL AND GROUND WATER 9443 1989(04) 05/23/89
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. ECRA REGULATORY STATUS 9442 1984(01) 12/26/04
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS 9551 1988(15) O1/21/OE
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LISTED HAEARDOUS WASTE 9441 1989(30) 06/19/09
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING. 9S51 1991(12) 12/10/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO. WA 9551 1991 (08) 05/29/91
RCRA REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9441 1986(84) 1I/l3L06
REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND LIMITATIONS GN DISPOSAL AND REUSE 9441 1909(13) 01/24/09
SHELL OIL FACILITY - TO COMPLIANCE 9431 1991 (02) 05109/91
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN NYDROCARBON RECOVERY 9521 1991)02) 08/30/91
Contaminated Soil
•HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9441 1990(13c) 05/01/90
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS SOILS AND DEBRIS FROM RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION 9551 1908(14) 12/01/88
‘MULTISOURCE LEACHATE (FI39) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS 9444 1991 (06) 11/01/91
‘PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TO UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL 9441 1990 (31) 10/01/90
‘SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE 9444 1985(01) 02/01/OS
‘SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOE SPILLED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9441 1995(20) 05/01/95
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OF TOLUENE/BENEENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE 9443 1985(11) 11/01/85
APPLICASILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT 9431 1994 (02) 11/15/94

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO 59
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL 9441 1995(00) 03/07/95
CLARIFICATION OF NEWLY LISTED WASTES AND HAZARDOUS DEBRIS 9554 1992 (01) 11/05/92
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMINT KILN DUST 9441 1993(16) 09/15/93
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST 9441 1993(11) 06/30/93
CLARIFICATION OF THE “CONTAINRD-IN• POLICY 9441 1994(04) 03/22/94
CLARIFICATIDN OF THE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN RCRA REQUIREMENTS TO COMMON EXCAVATION-TYPE ACTIVITIES 9441 1992(16) 06/11/92
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA CONTAINED-IN POLICY 5441 1995(32) 09/15/95
CONTAINED-IN POLICY 9441 1991(04) 03/26/91
CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTAR MEDIA - SOIL AND GROUND WATER 9443 1999(04) 05/23/09
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE 9551 1.990 (05) 10/09/90
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LXSTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1 .999 (30) 06/19/09
EXCAVATED CONSTRUCTION SOIL CONTAINING QUANTITIES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 9443 1905 (01) 02/21/05
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES 9502 1990(01) 05/07/90
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE WHICH CAN RE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO RE PRRSENT FOR SOIL THAT EXHIBITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC 9SS4 1995 (01) 06/14/95
11001, P093, AND U059 CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT STANDARDS 9554 1990(09) 00/13/90
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS 9551 1907(01) 01/20/87
LEACH TESTING PROCEDURE TO REMOVE LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM RESIDENTIAL. AREAS 9431 1909(01) 06/26/89
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED W1TH LEAD 9443 1907)24) ii/OS/07
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS 9443 1907(20) 11/20/07
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS 9528 1991(02) 02/27/91
PERMI17ING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOIL WHICH IS HAZARDOUS OR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1996)04) 11/27/96
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOILS CONTAMINATED FROM RELEASES OP COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9441 1992)34) 10/15/92
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE 9S02 1989)02) 05/2S/89
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE 9441 1907)21) 04/00/87
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TGLUEHE 9445 1985(01) 04/05/85
SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH CHLGRDANE AND NEPTACHLOR DURING TREATMENT OF BUILDINGS FOR TERM5TES 9441 1997(15) 03/11/87
SOILS FROM MISSOURI DIOXIN SITES, WHETHER HAZARDOUS 9441 1984)01) 01/06/04
USE OF Pfl0LEtJM-CONTAJ4(pffi SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING 9493 1991)02) 06/20/91
Creosote
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS-TIES DISPOSAL 9441 1990(20 ) 07/03/90
11035 LISTING AND DELIST0NG ISSUES GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1907(27) 12/11/07
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR FEHTACHLOROPHENOL 9444 1904 (04) 04 /26/é4
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF 9441 1906(30) 02/11/06
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE 9441 1906(69) 09/12/06
Definition
EDAT FOR WASTEWATRR 9432 1906(16) 12/01/06
•ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS 9432 1909(01) 08/01/09
•F001-F005 WASTEWATER DEFINITION 9443 1990(10) 06/01/90
•OIL AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY 9441 1900(42) 09/01/88
AI1TI-NEOPLASTIC AGENTS IN HOSPITAL WRITES, DISPOSAL OF 9442 1906(02) 01/30/06
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUET 9434 1909 (01) 03/17/09
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 9432 1906(03) 01/09/86
BY-PRODUCT VS SCRAP METAL 9441 1990(07) 03/30190
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR 9432 1985(00) 11/20/85
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC. DEFINITION OF UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE 9443 1900(00) 09/09/08
IGNITABILITT OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION 9432 1990(01) 02/16/90
11062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY 9444 1907(00) 03/16/87
LISTING OF TF-3, AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT 9442 1906)04) 05/06/06
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF 9432 1987(L2EI 11/04/87
OFF-SPEC COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS AT BOTTLING FACILITY 9441 1989(49) 09/28/89
POLICIES REGARDING SELF-CERTIFICATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9442 1995(02) 02/07/95
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER 9441 1992 (43) 12/15/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN ION EXCHANGE RESIN WASTE 9441 1997)01) 01/21/97
SHOOT1NG RANGES, APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO 9441 1988(41) 09/06/88
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 )u) 9502 1987(07) 07/24/87

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 60
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1986 (61) 08/18/86
STEAM-SPRAYING OP AN EMPTY TANK 9441 1990(10) 04/10/90
STILL 8017GM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY 9432 1988(01) 02/11/88
SUBMARINE REACTOR COMPARTMENTS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9554 1990(07) 07/30(90
IllS REGULATORY STATUS OP A DISTI LLATE MATER IAL KNOWN AS “LX-530” THAT IS IIEEIVEO FROM PETROLEUM AND COAL TAR NAPNTHA FEEDSTOCES 9441 1995 (02) 01/31 /95
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A EAGNOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1987 (01) 03/17/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOE SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9431 00-1 02/11/86
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE ‘fl 1990(01) 06/13/90
USED OIL DEFINITION TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT ‘GZARITE 9441 1990 (27) 11/30/90
ZINC OXIDE OUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER 9441 1987(61) 08/12/87
Dabutyltin Difluorade
DIBUTYLTIN DIFLUGEIDE NOT A LISTED RCRA WASTE 9441 1984 (271 09/20/84
Dredged Sediaente
DREDGE SEDIMENTS 9443 1089(08) 08/11/ES
LEAKS. SPILLS. AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS. MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO 9441 1906(07) 01/23/86
Electric Arc Furnace
R061 WASTE 0444 1009(02b) 03/01/89
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUET AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATMENT PROCESS 9444 1986(13) 12/29/06
EXCLUSIONS FOR E-WASTSS DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL) 9441 1989(40) 09/12/89
MINING WASTE EXCLUSiON FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY 9441 1906(48) 06/10/06
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES 9444 1966(02) 01/27/86
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST 9441 1988(27) 06/15/08
RECYCLING OF R06 1 AS AN INGREDIENT iN CEMENT 9441 1990(03) 02/13/90
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES 9441 1980 (07) 01/10/Se
STATUS OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST INCORPORATED INTO GLASS FRIT 9441 1992(42) 12/01/92
P-Wa etes
F001-F005 WASTEWATER DEFINITION 9441 1990(18) 06/01/90
LANO DISPOSAL BAN - TRACES OF NATURALLY OCCURRING EENZENE ANO TOLUENE 9553 1986(02) 04/01/06
CADMIUM WASTES FROM MILITARY COATING MATERIALS 9441 1990(11) 04/12/90
CHEMICAL ETCNING PROCESS-HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9441 1990(14) 06/12/90
CLARIFICATION OF F006/F019 INTERPRETIVE LESTER REGARDING WASTES GENERATED FROM AN ALUMINUM COATING PROCESS 9442 1995(03) 02/27/95
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLVENTS MICRO TO PAINTS OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS AS REGULATED SPENT SOLVENTS BASED ON ‘DIE SOLVENTS STUDY 9441 1996(13) 12/24/96
LAND D1EPOSAL RESTRICTIONS WASTE IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC HAZARDOUS WASTES 9551 1994 (02) 12/05/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN ION EXCHANGE RESIN WASTE 9441 1997(01) 01/21/97
REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED OR? CLEANING FILTERS 9441 1992(11) 05/28/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF PENTACNLOROPHENOL WASTES 9444 1987(29) 06/19/07
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PNOSPMATING OF ALUMINUM CANS 9442 1989(01) 01/01/ES
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9495 1990(01) 06/13/90
WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING P005 ELECTROPLATING WASTES 9554 1900(05) 08/11/08
ZIRCONIUM PNOSPNATING SLUDGES EXEMPTION 9444 1990(04) 05/02/90
Ferroue Metals
COMMERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOEILES 9441 1985(02) 01/16/ES
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERRGUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING) 9441 1900(48 1 11/21 180
Food Proceeesng Wane
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE NOT UNDER AGRICULTURAL WASTE EECLUSIDN 9441 1980(02) 06/19/80
FOOD PROCESSORS, IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS ON 9443 1900(02) 09/16/00
For maldehyde
RALLAST FLUID CLAESIFICATION 9444 1884(07) OS/IO/84
DEODORANTS FOR PORTASLE TOILETS 9444 1964(00) 06/06/84
DISCARDED COIMERCIAL CNDIICAL PRODUCTS 9444 19E5(OS) 05/14/05

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page Ho 61
EMBALMING FLUIDS, USED 9444 1985(07) 05/17/85
FORMALDEHYDE- EASED I LET 9441 1986(38) 05/01/86
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELI STING PETITION ADDRESSING I8SWA REQUIREMENTS FOR AIIALYI IIC (‘OR APPENDIX VIII CMPOLDWS 9431 1986(23) 12/30/86
Fr eeR
CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITARILITY 9443 1981(07) 04/16/87
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON 1987410) 09/03/87
USED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261 2 5441 1990(28) 10/18/90
High Tech Waflee
SOLAR CELL AND NIGH TECH INDUSTRIES HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1983 (03) 87/20/83
Iron Sponge
OIL NOD GAS EXEMPTION iN 3001(b) 12)(A( OP RCRA IRON SPONGE PROCESS 9441 1983(031 05/35/83
SPENT IRON SPONGE REGULATION AND TREAI78ENT 1886(02) 01/17/86
Manufacturing Process Unite
•NA3AIFACTURINO PROCESS UNITS 9441 1981(71) os/cl/I l
•PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9441 1986(451 05/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF EPA ’S REGULATIONS TO INDOOR PIPING AND FLOW EQUALIZATION TANKS USED TO CONVEY SOLVENTS TO EXTERIOR TANKS 9481 1991(02) 07/39/97
APPLICABILITY OF 8CM 70 HAZARDOUS WARTRS GENERATED iN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS ur.rrs 9441 1995(09) 03/08/95
CIIARACTSRIZAT1ON OP WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS 9442 1995(01) 01/26/95
DECANNING AND CRUSHING OPERATIONS 9432 1984(03) 04/16/84
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TAN9S, VEHICLES. VESSELS. PROCESS OR NANUPACTURING UNITS, OR PIPaINES WH1CN HAVE ORE)) 5NUT (flI 9441 1995125) 04/10/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED BY TEXACO TO ER BUILT IN EL KANSAS 9441 1995)88) 05/25/95
HASTES GENERATED III MANUPACTURING PROCRSS UNIT NOT SUEJECT 70 LAIID DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL REMOTED 9441 1987(53) 06/29/87
Mercury
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA 5LS5 9445 1917404) 12/04/87
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT 9499 1994 (031 IS/36/94
CLASSIFICATION OP OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9498 1993(04) 12/17/93
DETERMINATION ON WNtfl)fl A GENERATOR’S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONNAZARDOUS 9441 1955)23) 06/22/95
FLUORESCENT AND MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS AND CLASSIFICATION USING THE EP TOEICITY TEST 9443 1986(05) 04/30/86
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOW AS AN INGEEDIENT IN All INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 944 1 1994(08) 03/30/94
GUIDANCE FROM THE U S EPA ON THE CRUSHING OF MERCURY-CONTAINING LAMPS 9441 1995)21) 06/05/95
INTERPRETATION ON REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED 9444 1994 (03) 03/31/54
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1586(43) os/3D/IS
MERCURY THERMOMETERS. RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND EROESN 9441 1986(27) 04/92 (86
MERCURY, REFINING/REUSE OF SCRAP 9441 1986(061 01/21/86
NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEBRIS 9551 1990 (071 10/14/90
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS 9498 1993(03) 1.1/29/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY BAtTERIES AS HAZARDOUS DEER1E 9443 1994(02) 02/04/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA 9442 1994(06) 07/29/94
SCRAP AMAWAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF 9441 1989(12) 05/17/89
TREATMENT STANDARD FOR E106 (LON NERCURY SUSCATEGORY) NON-WASTEWATER RESIDUES PROM RBTORTINGJROASTILIG (RNERC) UNITS 9554 1994104) 07/14/94
WASTE LISTINGS FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - MERCURY 9441 1988(45) 11/12/Ia
Metal.
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATiON OPERATIONS OF SPENT PNOTOGRAPNIC FIXER SOLUTIONS 9496 1994101) 02/28/94
APPLICATION OF fl oE SCRAP METAL IEEMPTIGN TO LEAO FOIL USED IN DENTAL E-RAY PACKAGES 5441 1991(05) 04/29/93
CEATIFICATIOH/NGTIFICATION FOR MU1JTIPLE-CONST1TIJENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LORE 9551 1991(10) 06/05/92
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION 9443 1986(04) 01/22/86
ELECTROPLATING WASTES 9441 1951(06) 05/29/91
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION 9441 1989(10) 03/27/99
METAL. KeEl WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUWDMENT-UELISTING PETITION 9433 1987 (18) 08/07/87
RCRA POLICY STATEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DILUTION PROH1BITIDN AND COMRUSTION OF INORGANIC METAL-BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTES 9551 01-01 05/33/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER DRIPPINGS GENERATED DURING RADIATOR REPAIR OPERATIONS 9441 1593)071 04/29/93

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 62
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986 (20) 04/07/86
Mun It ions
‘UNDETONATED EXPOSIVES, DISPOSAL OF OFF-SPECIFICATION 9441 1984(28) 08 101/84
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0 50 CALIBER 9443 1994(06 ) 11/03/94
LEAD CONTAMINATION RESULTING FROM SKEET SHOOTING 9444 1993(041 09/23/93
MUNITIONS REGULATED AS HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1990(23) 00/21 190
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS 9442 1991(161 OS/01/91
Oily Waste
‘EP TOXICITY FOR OILY WASTES 9443 1905 (08) 09/01 185
•RP TOXICITY TEST ON OILY WASTES 9443 1904 104) 07/01/84
‘USED OIL FOR DUST SUPPRESSION/ROAD TREATMENT 9441 1990 (08) 03/01/90
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BODI’OIIS 9441 1906)37) 05/01/06
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 9592 1993)06) 10/07/91
DISPOSAL OF RAGS TO WIPE CRUDE OIL 9441 1989)23) OS/31/09
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AnD LISTED WASTES - LEACEATE LEVELS 9441 1906)03) 0 1/07/OS
METHODS 1310 AND 1330. EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE 9443 1987)14) 08/11/07
MINING WASTES FROM SEARLES LAKE OPERATIONS 9441 1993)12) 06/30/93
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS, PERMITFING COVERAGE OF 9502 1984 (01) 12/07/84
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PRTROLRUM REFINERY WASTE 9491 1991 101) 01/08/91
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERA8LS INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS 9441 1993)19) 09/27/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF AND PROPER DISPOSAL METHODS FOR NYDRAULIC FLUID FILTERS USED IN AIRCRAFTS 9444 1994)011 01/12/94
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRRSEING NSWA REQUIREMENTS FOE ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS 9433 1906)23) 12/30/86
SQG COMPLIANCE WITH TC SOLE 9441 1990(26) 09/20/90
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE 9442 1991 (00) 06/13/91
USED OIL FILTERS CLASSIFICATION 9441 3990(22) 08/17/90
Paint Waste
APPLICABILITY TO THE MIXING OF PAINT AND COATINGS THAT HAVE SEPARATED IN THE CONTAINER AND EMPTY PAINT CANS 9441 1997)03) 04/11/97
INTERPRETATION OF NOW THE RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO WASTE FROM THE REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM SURFACES 9441 1997)021 03/12/97
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEERIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE 9442 1991)12) 08/30/91
LEADED PAINT SANDELASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP 9442 1991(011 01/00/91
PAINT FILTER WASTE 9444 1982)011 09/15/02
PAINT FILTERS, USED 9444.1988(131 o7/2p/oo
PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AIR FILTERS 9442 1990(011 05/03/ lI
PAINT WASTES PAID THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1907(171 05/20/17
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1986(47) 06/02/06
PAINTS CONTAINING SOLVENTS 9444 1908(11) 05/05/08
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS. AND ADHESIVES 9441 19871093 02/19/87
TCLP AND LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS 9442 1991(10) 07/03/91
WASTES FROM ELECTROSTATIC WATERFALL CURTAIN PAINTING OPERATIONS 9444 1987(041 01/20/57
Phosphate Wastes
PHOSPHATE AND GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY WASTES 9443 1983(041 07/0S/03
Process Wastes
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION 9441 198S)12) 04/01/VS
‘MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS 9441 1909)54) 10/01/89
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS 9441 1988)13) 04/01/80
‘POINT OF GENERATION - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9554 1950)12) 08/01/90
‘SOLID WASTE VARIANCE FOR SPENT SOLVENT 9433 1905103) 09/01/eS
‘SPENT SOLVENT LISTIWGS 9444 1988(09) 04/01/80
‘WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS 9441 1906(96) 12/01/86
ACID PLANT BLOI IDOWN SLURRY/SLUDGE FROM PRIMARY COPPER PRODUCTION 9441 1909(321 07/06/89
APPLICASILITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES TO A CHEMICAL POLISNING SYSTEM 1994(OS) 07/15/94
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1980(05) 1 1/18/80

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 63
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7824. FEBRUARY 9. 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY 9441 1995(28) 08/24/95
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) 9441 1986(33) 04/23/86
CNLORIDE-ILMENITS PROCESS WASTES 9441 1991(05) 04/22/91
CHROMIUM WASTES. EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN 9441 1988(03) 01/13/88
CHROMIUM WASTES TRIVALENT AND NBXAVALENT, CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES 9441 1986)24) 03/21/86
CLARIFICATION OF F006/F019 INTERPRETIVE LETTER REGARDING WASTES GENERATED FROM AN ALUMINUM COATING PROCESS 9442 1995(03) 02/27/95
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 9592 1993(06) 10/07/93
CLARIFICATION ON THE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 9444 1985(08) OS/24/85
COLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTTERY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS 9441 1988)17) 05/lB/BE
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED, NOT A WASTE 9441 1986)39) 05/12/86
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 9444 1987)22) 06/24/87
FILTER CAKE WASTE CONTAINING SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT 9444 1987)43) 10/09/87
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING 9433 1987(10) 06/12/87
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH KOBS AND P001-005 WASTES 9444 1987)41) 09/15/87
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION 9441 1987)74) 09/02/87
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS 9441 1987)46) 06/17/87
PRS-COAT WASTE CONTAINING 2-ETHOXYETIIANOL (EXTRUDING PROCESS WASTE) 9444 1986)15) 08/04/86
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS. AND ADHESIVES 9441 1987)09) 02/19/87
PROCESS WASTEWATER FROM METAL DEGRRASIHG OPERATIONS 9553 1988 (02) 03/08/88
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT 9444 1987(49) 10/26/87
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALRALIHE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD CLOSED-LOOP pROVISION 9433 1985)06) 10/29/ES
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE STATUS OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES 9441 1997)06) 07/24/97
REGULATORY STATUS OP VARIOUS TYPES OF PENTACHLOROPHEHDL WASTES 9444 1987 (29) 06/19/87
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING OF ALUMINUM CANS 9442 1989)01) 01/01/89
REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VEHADIUM PRHTOXIDE REGULATION UNDER RCRA 9444 1986)17) 09/04/86
RESIDUE FROM STREAM-STRIPPING OF PROCESS WASTE CONTAINING TOLUENE 9441 1984)10) 05/15/84
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER AND SPILL RESIDUE 9444 1987)11) 04/14/87
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE 9442 1987)06) 10/26/87
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT HOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 1986)92) 12/05/86
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY 9441 1989)34) 07/06/89
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTION OF POLYSTYRENE 9441 1988)40) 09/01/88
SUPERHATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICXLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1987(83) 10/23/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO M i ASH TREATMENT FACILITY 9432 1987)10) 08/28/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1987(01) 0 3/ 1 7/g7
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1986(15) 12/22/86
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS 9442 1986(07) 07/02/86
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLEHE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER 9441 1986)52) 07/02/86
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS 9444 1989(08) 08/21/89
WATER WALL SPRAY BOOTH WASTES AND THE SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1987(06) 02/28/87
Regulated Waatea
SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1986(14) 06/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTED LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS 9441 1994(11) 05/11/94
CLARIFICATIOM OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OP 0 50 CALIBER 9443 1994)06) 11/03/94
DREDGE SEDIMENTS 9443 1989(08) 08/11/89
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING 9441 1986)76) 10/08/86
RCRA REGULATION OF DOT-TREATED WOOL BLANKETS AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1992)40) 11/17/92
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL 9441 1989)12) 03/31/89
STORAGE FACILITIES. RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9432 1983402) 11/29/83
Smelting Weate
MIHING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION 9441 1985(3S) 10/01/85
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFINING SITES 1986(16) 07/09/86
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOYERY UNIT 9499 1994)03) 05/26/94
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT 9441 1989 (01) 02/07/89
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF ‘HICEBL MATTR BY-PRODUCT 9441 1994(32) 12/23/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE E069 WASTES 9441 1991(149) 08/05/91

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Paso No. 64
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTSRS THAT EECYCLE ROS S WASTES 9496 1991(01) 05/05 /91
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES 9444 1908(14) 01/26/86
Soil
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION 9433 1986(19) 04/24/06
FIRE TRAINING PITS. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR 9489 1981(02) 01/22/87
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS 9443 1981(29) 11/20/87
LEAKS. SPILLS. AND ILLEGAL IISCHI.RGES OF LISTED WASTES 30 SURFACE WATERS. MIXTURE RULE APPLIED ic 9441 1986(01 ) 01/21/56
SOIL COMTAIIIHRTEO 1(1119 CHLORDAWE AS A RESULT DV PESTICIDE APPLICATION 9444 3984(20) 09/29/85
SIWFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE. APPLICABILITY OF 300 5(i) OF ECRA 9416 1981(01) 06/09/07
TCLP
ADOPTION OF TCLP FOR DELISTING DS)4OHSTRATIONS 9413 1990(011 04/14190
CALCULATION OF TCLP COI4CE1ITRATIOOIS PEON TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS 9445 1992(0)) 09/21/92
INTERPRETATION OP HOW THE RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO WASTE FROM TilE REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM SURFACES 9441 1991(02 ) 03/12/97
TRSAIISE1IT STANDARD FOR 1106 (LOW MERCURY SU9CATEUORY) HUN-WASTEWATER RESIDUES FROM RrTORT ING/ROAST ING IRMERCI UNITS 9554 1994(04) 01114/94
l ift
•PRODUCI’ WASXWATFRS FROM DIHITROTO3.IJENE - Eli) LISTING 9441 1908121) 05101/00
To xici ty
•REOULADID1I OF MUNICIPAL HASTE COMBUSTION ASH 9513 1991(01) 0510 1/91
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL 9444 1901 (26 1 01/02/87
INTERPRETATION OF NOW THE ECRA REGUlATIONS APPLY TO WASTE FROM THE REMOVAL OF PAINT FROM SURFACES 9441 1991(02) 03/12/97
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE WHICH CAN BE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE PEESENT FOR SOIL THAT EXHI0ITS THE TOXICITY C hARACTERISTIC 9564 1999(011 06/14/95
IS TEE CHEMICAL POIASSIU14 MEEACYANOCOBALT (I2)-PERRATE (II) • USED AT A DOE NUaflR PLANT. CONSIDERED A MIXED WASTE UNDER RCRA7 9441 1999(301 09/13/95
LDSD AS CEITERIA FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9443 1909)09) 09/09/08
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CO?FTAI4INATED WITH LEAD 9443 1987(241 11/05/97
PEHTACHLOROP3IENOL AS A WOOD PRESERVATIVE 9444 1988(15) 08 129/88
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES 9487 1986(081 09127186
SPEND PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION 9433 9991(023 04/26/91
SUIO4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM 4PAT( 9533 00-14 13/14/ES
TOXICITY OF 2 .4 •D WASTE 9444 1984(D ) ) 04/30/84
HAZARDOUS WASTE iDENTIFICATION RULE (II4 1E I
ZREF / /
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERM1NATION 460 FR 7825 FEBRUARY 9. 1995) OF ElSE WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE 9441 1995(34) 11/27/95
Ccntaminaced Media
CONCERN REGARDING EPA S PLANS TO DISALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT (CANU) FROVISIOH 9502 1995)03) 10/18/95
HRIARDOIIS WASTE IMPORTAT 101)
(See Import) XRIF / /
HEALTH AND SAFETY
IREF / /
OSNA HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ACTIVITY 9504 1987(01) 06/09/87
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPEOVRD METHODS FOR SUBPART K PERMITS 9442 1990(03) 11/19/90
HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
(See Risk Aaseassert) IREF / /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 65
NiGH TECH WASTES
(See Hazardous Waste identification) REEF / /
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
(See also Subtitle D under Solid Waste) XREP / /
fl(OUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 198B(30 06/01/88
•MED1CAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE 9441 1989(24) 06/01/89
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 9592 1994(10) 09/28/94
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE 9441 1966(32) 04/21/86
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF 9441 1966(09) 03/26/86
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON-ZINC BATTERIES 9441 1964(07) 04/19/84
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS 9443 1967)28) 11/20/87
MANAGEMENT AI(D DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI ELINDS 9451 1996)07) 07/12/96
MERCURY DRY CELL BATtERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9443 1986)18) 09/04/66
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS 1990)01) 11/26/90
RESIDUES FROM U 5 NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER 9441 1987)16) 03/17/67
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL 9442 1991 III) 12/19/91
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-VOURSELFERS 9441 1967(64) 06/13/87
Collection Programs
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE - - COLLECTION P500RAM5 . CLARIFICATION OF ISSUES 9574 00-01 11/01/66
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE 9574 1991(0)) 05/30/91
ROSA SUBTITLE C REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS COLLECTING CESOG WASTE 9 5 00-02 07/22/92
HOUSEHOLD WASTES
(See Solid Waste) REEF / /
NSWA
(See Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments) XREF / /
NSWA PROVISIONS
(See Naaardcus and Solid Waste Amendments) REEF / /
NWIR
(See Hazardous Waste Identification Rule) REEF / /
HYDROGEOLOGICAL DATA
(Ses Groundwater Monitoring) XREF / /
IDENTIFICATION
(See EPA I 0 Number) REEF / /
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
(See EPA 1 0 Number) REEF / /
IGNITAB1LITt
(Ses Characteristic Hazardous Wasts) REEF / /

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 66
IMPORT
(See also Generators, Transporters)
•ACCUWLATION TIME FOR HAZARDOUS NASTE IMPORTERS 9456 1992 (01) 09 ,01/91
BUSSLSR CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSI’NDROUS OXYCHLORIDE ARE NOT WASTE WHEN RETUENED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION 9456 1994 loll 12/16/94
CANADIAN MANIFRST FOR SHIPMENTS ENTERING TILE u s 9462 196S (011 11/29/es
GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITISS FOR IMPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9455 1995)51) 06/25/95
MOVEMENT OP NICXEL CADMIUM BATTERIES PROM MEXiCO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES 9452 1993(01) 01/29/93
IHCIHERATIOI1
(See also Subpart II under Thermal Treatment)
•RECIRCULATING TAME, REGUlATION OF
•NASTS DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT Oil EXCI.WED WASTES
A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER A DETOZ(SM) WET OXIDATION PROCESS WOULD BE REGULATED UNDER SUBPART IC OR UNDER SUSPART 0
ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OP RES lOCAL CONT#AIIHANTS IN THE EPA INCINERATOR RESIDUES (REVISiON)
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
APPLICABILITY OF OMNIBUS AIJTNORIT# AND SITE SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIM1IATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY
APPLICABILITY OF THE OMNIBUS AUTHORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RlSK ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY
DELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES PROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,5-T AND SILVER PESTICIDES
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT DET) FOR 9 OF THE WASTE CONES FROM A TOI 4 URNE DI ISOCYANATE (TOE) TREATASI LITY GROUP
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USI a ] INCINERATION FOR TWO P07 1 WASTE STREAMS
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WNRN THREE IS AR INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY TEEM
ENFORCEMENT POLiCY OH WASTE BURNING FOR ENSEGY RECOVERY
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN DIOXIN WASTES, MODIFICATION OF
INCINERATORS TEAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS, ECRA EXCLUSION, CM APPLIES
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OP MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OP MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMBUSTION OP WASTES AS INCINERATION
MIRTERE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
ON-SITE INCINERATION OP A WASTE TEAT 18 BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U S EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACNI.OROPMENOL C PC ?) PROM GRQ2NOWATRE
SIIC4ART OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERI4ITrIHG COIPIENTS
TNRBMAL RELIEF VETI’S ON HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS. ACCEPTABILITY OP
Nazardoua Waste ImportAtlon
‘MAIIlFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
•SIGNING 1TE MANIFEST AS AN AO 5T WHEN IMPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
EPA’S NON-OBJECTION TO IMPORTS OP COEALT OXIDE-MDLYBDIC OIIDE SPENT CATALYSTS INTO TEE U S FOR RECOVERY
FEDERAL POLICY OH SEVERAL ISSUES RELATED TO TEE USE OP TEE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANI FEST BY HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTERS
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORT REQUIREMENTS
9462 1995101) 01/01/95
9462 1995102) 03/01/99
9456 1996 (01) 02/15/96
9462 1996101) 03/01/96
9456 1996(02) 06/17/96
ICREP
9481 19641011
9441 1997431)
9499 1995102)
9496 1965103)
9499 1994 (09)
9490 1996)05)
9496 1996(01)
9433 1997)26)
9514 1994)04)
9514 1994( 11 )
944) 1995131)
9494 1996406)
9489 1995(04)
9441.1994(15)
9541 3986414)
9441 1985(05)
9441 1995(32)
9573 1990102)
9432 1986(14)
9444 1986401)
9441 1996(04)
9444 1996(09)
9532 00-lB
9489 00-3
/ /
11/01/84
04/01/97
08/02/95
04 /0 1/ eS
OB/ 17/94
05/10/96
02/26/96
10/29/97
10/34/94
07 /26/94
10/03/95
12 /11/86
05/10/95
01/31/84
01/01/96
02/04/6 5
10/07/85
03 #29/90
09 /06/96
03 /11/SB
0 1/07/96
03/03/56
03/14/89
06/30/56
ELF Rule
• REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA
•SNAM RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED BIFs
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED 9IB4ING)GARIF1CATION UNIT
APPLICATION OF TEE SIP RULE TO HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC , LEMORIT. ILLINOIS
E l ? REGULATIONS EPPECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER
ElF RULE APPI.IEO I’O NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
CLARIFiCATION OF RSGOLAT1ON OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
CLARI VOCATION OF STATE AND FEDERAL APPR.ICASILITY OP TEE SIP RULE TO LIME KILNS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES
CLASSIFICATION OF 0 1 . 171 MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
9499 1994110) 10/01/94
9498 1991105) 10/01)91
9431 1994)02) 11/15/94
9499 1992(02) 12/30/92
9409 1991103) 09/23/91
9528 1991(01.1 09107 /91
9489 1991 (04) 99/02/51
9499 9994 (13) 12/05/54
949B 1991(01) 04/30/91
9498 1994)081 07/29/94
9498 1991104) 12/17 )93

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 67
COMBINED OPERATION OF ‘ n IX RESOURCE RECOVERY KILNS AND CEMENT KILNS AT GIANT CEMENT COMPANY HARLEYVILLE, SC
DEFINITION OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING, MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS
DETERMINATION ON WHETNER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE
ENHANCED PUBLIC PARTICI PATION AND STRONGER COMBUSTION PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
HAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS USED AS GUENCNWATER iN CEMENT PRODUCTION
IMPACT OF DRAPT HAZARDOUS WASTE MIN iMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEG’1 ON ONtO’ S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
INTERIM STATUS UNDER THE ElF RULE
K-WASTE FILTER CARE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
REGULATORY I NTEEPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS P1 FELINE METERS
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAF S AND THE VCR PROCESS UNIT LOCATED AT BORDEN’S GEISMAR. LA FACILITY
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE E069 WASTES
RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO CEASE HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING AND NOTICE OF CITIZEN SUITS
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
Bagl louae Dust
EAGHOUSE DUST GENERATED FROM REMELTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL
BAGNOUSE DUSTS USED AS • OR TO PRODUCE. AGGREGATE
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO A FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING DUCT SYSTEM
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS
RECYCLING OF ZINC OXIDE BAGHOUSE DUST
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TEEATHRNT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGNOUSE SYSTEM
5496 1992(01) 08/11/92
5488 1993(01) 12/06/93
9498 1994(05) 07/14/94
950S 1994(01) 05/23/94
949E 1994 (06) 07/20/94
9498 1994(04) 07/05/94
94B9 1991(01) 02/15/91
9573 1994(01) 01/10/94
9928 1991 (03) 08/19/91
9441 1990(35) 12/21/90
9441 1991(17) 11/04/91
9496 1993(01) 12/27/93
949B 1993(03) 11/29/93
9494 1993(01) 09/14/93
9499 1994)12) 11/08/94
9498 1993)02) 06/02/93
9442 1994)05) 04/15/94
9496 1991)01) 09/05/91
9498 1994)01) 04/04/94
9494 1994 103) 06/07/94
9444 1984)16) 08/01/84
9493 1991(03) 06/21/91
9441 1995(13) 10/19/95
9441 1989(48) 09/12/89
9551 1987(01) 01/20/97
9443 1987(25) 11/04/87
9432 1997(01) 03/17/87
9494 1986(03)
9431 1994(02)
9433 1987(01)
9432 1996(02)
9441 1996 (95)
9494 1991(01)
9495 1986(09)
9495 1986(05)
9433 1986(16)
9432 1985(08)
9432 1985110)
9442 1987(04)
9461 1989101)
9498 1995(02)
9523 00-17
03/01/ES
11/15/94
0 1/07/87
01/03/96
12/23/86
02/04/91
04/21/86
03/05/86
08/12/ES
11/20/ 85
12/30/ 85
08/31/87
01/03/89
11/30/ 95
09/02/98
06/09/94
09/03/87
07/29 /8 8
06/30/93
09/15/9 3
12/05/94
07/29/94
10/09/87
03/15/96
Boiler
thAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
APPLICABILITY OF ECRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUM1NG/GASIFICATION UNIT
BOILER VARIANCE FOR A WASTE NEAT RECOVERY EDILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTONCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES )BIFa)
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REOUIREMENTS
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES
HALOGEN ACID FURHACES AS INDUSTRIAL FURNACES OR BOILERS
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION (LURRIZOL)
MIXING LOW AND HIGH BTU WASTES - SHAM BURNING, BLENDING, MANIFESTING
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS
SITE-SPECIFIC RISE ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMItTING COMMENTS
CEEBI It Kiln
APPLICABILITY OF ECRA TO VARIOUS PRODUCTS (E 0 • CLINKER, FERTILIZER) PRODUCED BY A CEMENT KILN EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER 9441 1994(14)
CEMENT Ella BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS 9528 1997(10)
CEMENT KILN DUST WASTE 9441 1988(36)
CLARIFICATION OF ECRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST 9441 1991(11)
CLARIFICATION OF ECRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST 9441 1993(16)
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TEEA1I4EMT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES 9498 1994(13)
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES 9498 1994(08)
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN CEMENT KILNS 9441 1987)79)
EPA RESPONSES TO CONCERNS RAISED ON THE MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACT) STANDARDS FOR CEMENT KILNS 9498 1996 102)

-------
07/06/9 5 KEYWORD DwE l l Page NO. 68
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUS APPLICABILITY FOR cE swr EILHS 9528 1987112) Be/ l B/B ?
MAXIMUM ACHIEVAI,BE CONTROL TECNNOLOGY )MACT) RULEMAKING FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS 949E 1996104) 04/10/96
MINERAl. PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNiNG HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL 9441 1984119) 08/15/84
RCRA STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS, OFF-LOADING FROM TANK TRUCKS 9488 1988 101) 12/09/30
RECYCLING OP ELECTROPLATING SLAIOGSS (P006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE 9441 1989(19) 04/26/89
REGULATORY STATUS OF CEMENT PRODUCED USING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS 9441 1993(22) 11/02/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRODUCtS (INCLUDING CLINKER AND FERTILIZER) PRODUCED IN CEMIHT KILNS EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER 9441 1994112) 05/17/94
SHAM INCINERATION S lID TREATMENT OF K048-KIS2 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES 9494 1991102) 03/29/91
USED OIL DEFiNITION APPLICABILITY it OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT 9441 1990(33) 31(30/90
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF 9 94 1985(03) 10/11/85
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS 9444 1988 (I2a) 01/26/88
Destruction Removal Efficiency (DEE)
ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS BURNING DIOXIN-LISTED WASTES 9488 1992 (01) 09/22/92
VIABILITY OF TRIAL BURN RESULTS WITH INCOMPLETE YOST DATA 9488 1987(09) 10/15/87
Electric Arc Furnace
EMISSION CONTROL OUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE AT FOUNDRY HOT A K061 WASTE 9441 1984108) 05/83/84
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL) 9441 1989)48) 09/12/89
PRIMARY MID SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEKL IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES 9444 1986(02) 01 (27 186
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST 9441 1988)27) 06/15/88
RECYCLING OF ROS1 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT 9441 1990(03) 02/13/90
REGULATORY DETERMINATION 06$ THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES (MET) 9441 1994(23) 08/19/%I
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES 9441 1988(07) 03/10/88
STATUS OP ELECTRIC SAC FURNACE OUST INCORPORATED INTO GLASS FE lT 9441 1992(42) 12/01/92
Furnace
BURNING USED OIL GENERATED BY PRIVATE BOAT OWNERS ON-SITE 1991(04) 04/23/91
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE 8488 1987(03) 03/25/87
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9498 1994(06) 07/20/9
POPPING FURNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATEO ORDNANCE BY INCINERATION - METALS RECOVERY 9441 1983104) 06/OQ/83
RECOVERY KILN AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9488 1989 (02) 10/04/89
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OP THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT POPPING FURNACE’ 9489 1994 (02) 09/19/94
Hazardous Waste Coetustor
EPA’S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996)06) 05/23/96
Nasardous Wasts Fuels
ABILITY OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING BIF TO SPIKE METALS AND USE OF TEST DATA IN LIEU OF A TRIAL BURN 9498 1996(03) 04/01/96
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE RIP RULE 9498 1994 (05) 07/14/94
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES 1993)01) 09/14/fl
USED O 1L FURLS BURNED ZN INCINERATORS 9495 1986(131 06/27/86
IncineratDr Residue
‘REGULATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMEUSTION ASH 1991 (01) 05/01/91
INCINERATOR RESIDUES FROM TRIAL BURN 9488 1990)01) 03/29/dO
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1984(05) 02/19/84
TRIPLE-RINSING REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE it CONTAINERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9431 1993(01) 07/28/93
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIRED WITH ‘TRICMLORDRENZENE AND NEXACNLOROETHANE 9441 1988(04) 01/14/88
Incinerators
‘CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9528 1989(11) 07/01/89
‘FUME INCINERATORS 9488 1986(03) 03/01/86
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS 9441 1986107) 11/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FIJMING/GASIFICATION UNIT 9431 1994)02) 11/15/94
ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS BURNING DIOXIN-LISTED WASTES 9488 1992(01) 09/12/92
BOILER VARIANCE FOR A WASTE HEAT RECOVERY BOILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF 9433 1987)01) 01/07/57

-------
01/06/98 KEPj °j olDER p age Ho 69
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD 9432 1986(02) 01/03/86
CHEMICAL AGEITT/MIINZTIOSS SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED MID SUGGESTED ROOD PERMIT 9432 1995(071 11/19/85
CHLORINE EMISSIONS P HD! HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS 9486 1990(02) 04/19/90
CLARIPICATION ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESOEBERS AND INCINERATORS 9469 1994101) 02/23/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT. MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES 9496 1994(06) 01/29/54
CLARIFICATION IS A FACILITY THAT HAS A “PRIMARY PURPOSE” OF RURNI)C HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO RCRA REGULATIONS’ 9496 1994(07) 07121154
CLSAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OP AN INCINERATOR 9466 1961(04) 06/12/67
CLOSURE PLAN FOB ‘(lIE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE WRITS AT YERTAC ’S SMU 1DOWN I4AIRIFACTURING pLANT 9498 1667(01) 02/09/67
CONSTRUCTION OP A NEW INCINERATOR WITH ONE CHANGES lURING INTERiM STATUS 9526 1966(07) 091191(6
CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY THE ORGANIC AIR EMISSION STANDARD 9514 1991(011 12(03/91
DEACTIVATION (POPPING) FURNACES AS INC TORS 9432 j997(071 0 7/17/ I l
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASH 9433 1991( 13) 17/10/91
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SO 1L USING NGBILR INCINERATION 9498 1966(05) 04/24/86
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OP CSRTIF1CATION OR A RCRA PERMIT 9468 00-LA 05/07/66
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS PROM 0 1( 5 PRODUCTION OF CNLOROSENZWS 9441 1986(11) 04/21/86
ENHANCED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND STRONGER COMBUSTION PERMITTING RRQGIRN4RNTS 9505 1994(01) 05/23/94
GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING PONC’s 9488 1969(02) 01/13/86
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES 9 pE 5994(04) 57/05/94
GUIDANCE ON USING ALTERNATIVS RISE ASSESSMENT APPROACRES SN DETERMINING INCINERATOR METALS EMISSION LIMITS 9486 1992 (02) 11/17/92
MEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR 9432 1965(081 11/20/95
INCINERATOR METALS EMISSIONS CO)6TROLS 9486 1989(03) 10/11/89
INCINERATOR NOT CONSIDERED TOTALLY E&CLOSED TREATMENT 9432 1967(061 01/02/Ri
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OP NERVE AGENTS, )9IGN PRIORITY PERMITTING 9501 1966(01 ) 09111/96
INTEGRAL DESIGN STA1IDARO IN BOILER DEFINITION ILUBRIZOL) 9412 1985(10) 12/30/85
INTERIM STATUS EXPANS iON TO ADO AN INCINERATOR 9528 00-1 Il/ZR/ el
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACES 9554 1990(33) 11/20/90
MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATOR ASN MA0IAGRMENT 9513 1966(01 1 IS/27/E
MEW JERSEY EINC COMPANY K061 STORAGE PILE 9481 1988(01 1 61/15/86
OMNIBUS AUTHORITY TO CONTROL EMISSIONS OP METALS. ((CL A PICe FROM INCINERATORS 9524 19R9(01) 02/27/89
PARTIAL PERO4ITIIBG OP INCINSRATOR UNIT 9522 1985 (041 08/30/85
PRRMITTING INCINERATORS 9488 00-2 06/10/86
PERO4STTINO OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS 9501 i9S2(01) 07/09/62
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A 9CR INCINERATOR 9496 1986(04) 04/11/86
PICXLR LIOUDR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACR 9432 1951(13) 11/ 10/87
PONC SELECTION FOR RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRiAL BURN - USE OF 12.3-TRICHLOROBENXSNR 9498 1991(01) 02/09/91
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES PSO 1 1997(03) 12/fl/B?
QUAHW14 ‘TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - RNGULATORW CLASS1PICATIGN 9488 1991154) 09/30/91
RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARDING VARIOUS ISSUES 056 THE COMBUSTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTS 9468 1997401) 07/30/9 ?
SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSRSSMRRTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES TNAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA 9498 1995(02) 11/10/95
SPENT FLUIDISED BEG MEDIA MID CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS 9444 1986(28) 12/05/06
SU)C4ARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COAO(ENT5 9523 oo-ii 09/02/88
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS 9442 1991(16) 05/01/91
THIRD THiRD LASID DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9951 1990(153 12/20/90
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TRRA’I18RIFT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PEDV)51O39S APPLICABiLITY TO AN AEN TREATMENT FACILITY 9432 1987(10) 06/26/81
USE OF OMNIBUS AUTHOR iTY TO CONTROL 59841551095 OP METALS, NCL. AND PICS FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS 9488 1989(011 02/27/89
Industrial PurriaCa
“REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA 9498 1994 (10) 10/01/k
APPLICABILITY OF ECRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT 9431 1994(02) 11/15/94
BOILERS MID INCINERaTORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRA l DESIGN STANDARD 9432 1986)01) 01/03/86
BOILERS USED IN GREENNOUSS OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 9432 1986)03) 01/ 19 /86
BURNING C((AEACTBRISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PRTROLEW4 PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1986 )95 1 12/23/d6
CLARIFICATION IS A FACILITY THAT HAS A “PRIMARY PURPOSE” OF BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO RCRA REGULATIONS’ 9498 1994 (07) 07121/ft
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT 9498 1994(03) 05/26/ft
CLASSIFICATION OP OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT As AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9499 1993 (04) 12/17/93
DEACTIVATION (POPPING) FURNACES AS INCINERATORS 9412 1987(01) 07/17/El
DEFINITION OP INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING. MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS 9488 1993(01) 12/06/91

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 70
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTFO(4S FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CNLOROBEN2ENR 944 1 1965(11) 04/21/55
HALOGEN ACID FURNACES AS INDUSTRIAL FURNACES OR BOILERS 9433 1986(16) 08/12/86
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE WHICH CEASES BURNING STATUS UNDER RIP REGULATION 9455 1991102 ) 06/06/91
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REGI 9494 1967(02) 04/15/87
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9432 1987 (13) 11/10/87
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STA7’US OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY ENACES 9496 1993(01) 12/27/93
REGULATORY iNTERPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAI4INATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS 9498 1993(03 ) 11/29 193
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCEENING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS 9498 1994 (12) 11/08/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAFE AND TNE VCR PROCESS UNIT LOCATED AT BORDEN’S GEISMAR, LI , FACILITY 9498 1993(02) 06/02/93
SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA 9498 1995(02) 11/30/95
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES 9412 1986(04) 01/21/86
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF 9494 1985(03) 10/fl/aS
Maxicstxe Ach ievable Control Technology (MACTI Standards
EPA RESPONSES TO CONCERNS RAISED ON THR MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MaCTI STANDARDS FOR CEMENT KILNE 9495 1996(02) 03/15/96
MAXIMUM ACNIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACI’) RULEMAKING FOR HAIARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS 9498 1996 (04) 04/10/96
RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARD1NG VARIOUS ISEUES ON THE COMBUSTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9488 1997 (011 07/30/97
PONCe
DEPARTHENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE 9458 1987(031 03/25/87
GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING PONC’s 9488 1958(021 01/13/88
WATER-STRIPPED PONCs ON INCINERATOR DRE 9488 1985 (07) 05/26/85
Scrubber Water
INTERPRETATION OP THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS 9441 1994116) 06/10/94
WASTE CODES AND TREATMENT RESIDUES 9554 1990)03) 03/07/91
Syateri Removal E lf actency (SRE)
USE OF METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE 9498 1995(01) 11/OB/9S
Trial Burn
ABILITY OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNiNG BIF TO SPIKE METALS AND USE OF TEST DATA IN LIEU OF A TRIAL BURN 9498 1996)03) 04/0I/ 6
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA’S MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1986)20) 12/11/86
D1OXIB TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT 9486 0 1-iA 05/07/86
EXISTING INCINERATORS AND DATA IN LIEU OF TRIAL BURN 9523 1982(01) 10/22/82
GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING PONC’e 9488 1986(02) Oi/13/BB
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL RURN FAILURES 9496 1994(04) 07/05/94
IMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMISATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON ONIO’S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS 9513 1994(01) 01/10/94
INCINERATOR RESIDUES PROM TRIAL BURN 9485 1990(01) 03/29/90
TRIAL BURNS, 06k REPORT 9373 1984(06) 09/10/54
USE OF METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUETRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE 9496 1995(01) 11/09/99
Waste Burning
CLARIFICATION REGARDING S1NGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIRS 9498 1994(05) 07/29/94
INCINERATORS BURNING HOE-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9S24 I9BS(01) 08/01/85
MINIMUM BEAT CONTENT REGUIRENENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN RIFe 9498 1994(111 11/04/94
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CU’I’OFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES 9494 1993(01) 09/14/93
INCINERATOR RESIDUE
(See Incineretion) XREF / /
INCINERATORS
(See IncIneration) XREF / /

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 71
INCOMPLETE PART ES
(See Permit Application)
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
XREF / /
(See Incineration)
INSPECTIONS
EREF I /
INSURANCE
(See Compliance)
XREF / /
(See Financial Responaibility)
INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
XREF / I
(See State Authorization)
INTERIM STATUS PROCESS
XREF 1 /
(See eleo Construction)
‘EXISTING PORTION OF A LAND DISPOSAL UNIT, DEFINITION (260 10)
‘EXISTING PORTION DEFINITION AND NSNA IMPACT
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS EXISTING VS NEW TANK
•INTERIM STATUS FOR MILITARY FACILITIES OPEN BURNING AREA
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION. DIOXINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION
SIP RULE APPLIED TO NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES I SIPs)
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINTS MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES
DELISTING. INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U S NAMEPLATE COMPANY
IS A SECTION 3008(h) ENFORCEMENT OBOES AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU’
RESPONSE TO THE PSTITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO CEASE HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING AND NOTICE OF CITIZEN SUITS
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY
Change During Interim Statue
‘ADDITION OF A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT TO AN EXISTING INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
‘ADDITION OF NEW HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT
‘CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITISS
‘CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORPORATE REORGANIZATION
‘CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS CORRECTION
‘CHANGES IN INTERIM STATUS - SELLING PART OF A FACILITY
‘CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
‘CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS - RECONSTRUCTION LIMIT WHERE SOME UNITS HAVE CLOSED
‘CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS WHERE ORIGINAL UNITS ARE CLOSED
‘DSLlSTING OF KISS WASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS
‘INTERIM STATUS VS PERMIT MODIFICATION FOE NEWLY REGULATED UNITS
‘RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
‘RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
CHANGES TO FACILITIES DURING INTERIM STATUS
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INCINERATOR WITH THE CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND TEE OMNIBUS PROVISION
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, REGULATORY STATUS OF
FACILITY CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS
FACILITY TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
IMPROVEMENTS TO SURFACS IMPOUNDMSMTS UNDER INTERIM STATUS
XREF / /
9432 1982 (01 1 08/01/82
9432 1985105) 08/01/85
9483 1988109) 05/01/88
9441 1984 (04) 02/01/84
9551 1987(01 ) 01/01/87
9528 1991 (01) 08/07/fl
9494 1991(011 02/04/91
9498 1994(081 07/29/94
9433 1987 (031 02/25/87
9502 199S101) 02/17/95
9498 1994(01) 04/04/94
9433 1986 (17) 09/30/86
9S2B 1985101) 12/01/OS
9528 1983101) 03/01/83
9528 1987 (09) o8/01/d7
9528 1985(04) 10/01/Es
9528 1988(05) 10/01/88
9528 1987 (16) 11/01/87
9528 1989111) 07/01/89
9528 1987104) 01/01/d7
9528 1987(03) 03/01/87
9431 1986(12) 04/01/96
9525 1989101) 05/01/89
9528 1985(02) 01/01/OS
9528 1988(031 05/01/88
9528 19821011 OS/28/82
9528 1986)07) 09/19/86
9528 1986)01) 03/03/86
9828 1987102) 03/11/87
9528 1982 (02) 07/20 )82
9477 1986)011 01/03/86
9528 1984(011 09/10/84

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO 72
INTERIM STATUS EXPANSION TO ADD AN INCINERATOR
INTERIM STATUS OF PROPOSED LANDFILL CELLS
NEW WASTE STREAMS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
NEWLY IDENTIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW it
NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT PERMITTED FACILITIES
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE
REDESIGNATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS
SPENT FLUIDIEED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDEE INTERIM STATUS
9528.00-1 11/15/87
9487 1901 (01) 03/12/81
9528.1990101) 04/02/90
9528 1990(03) 07/11/90
9520 1986(04) 01/30/86
9476.1985103) 09/Il/OS
9528 198e (02) oS/I l/o s
9444 1906 (26) 12/OS/OS
Closure
CRDUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT MONITGRING/CGRJECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSED INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
‘LEASING OF PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSURe
3008 (h) OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT. INTERPRETATION OF
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO TSD UNITS
DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED DELAY OF CLOSURE REGULATION. GUIDANCE
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WIT)) PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
MUNITIGNS REGULATED AS HAZARDOUS WASTES
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN APPROVAL
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF OBJECTION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES • INC
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE. APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (1) OF RCRA TO
Corrective Action
CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND INTERIM STATUS FACILITY BOUNDARY
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WIT)) REGARD TO TED UNITS
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
GUIDANCE ON NOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004 1W AND ORDER 3008)))) REQUIREMENTS FOE CORRECTIVE ACTION
INTERPRETATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE REMZDIATION OF CONTAMINATION
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICAB1LITY TO
Leee nI Interim Statue
‘APPEAL/RECOURSE PROCESS FOR PERMIT DENIAL
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITY AT FACILITIES THAT LOSE INTERIM STATUS
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT NEWLY REGULATED FACI LITI ES
9.055 OF INTERIM STATUS
9.055 OF INTERIM STATUS - LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
OWNER/OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITY IF FACILITY’S INTERIM STATUS IS TERMINATED
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOSING INTERIM STATUS BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OWM AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
‘TSDF CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE AFTER LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
LOSE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTERIM STATUS AND PERNIT ISSUANCE
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED it WASTES
PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE PART B APPLICATION
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT NAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
RCRA 3001If) (2) Ib) AND STATES EXCLUSION OF WASTES PROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OP LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS PROVISIONS AS IT APPLIES TO 00/00 FACILITIES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY 82 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE
TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY ORLISTED WASTES. REGULATORY STATUS
Obtaining Interim Statue
‘BURNING AND BLENDING AND INTERIM STATUS
‘CIRCUMSTANCES FOR OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS FOR UNITS AT AN INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
9481 1906)02) 04/00/88
9526 1903)03) 09/Ot/Bi
9502 1985)09) 12/16/85
9480 1996)01) 02/20/96
9476.1908(04) 05/31/00
9476 00-10 05/12/89
9441 1990(23) 08/2)/So
9464.1906(01) 04/09/86
9476 1905)04) 09/25/ES
9476 1909)03) 09/07/89
9416 t990(OII 06/04/SO
9476 1987(01) 06/09/87
9502 1996)01) 01/01/96
9404 1906)07) 07/01/86
9400 1996)01) 02/20/96
9441 1906)83) 11/13/86
9502 1909)04) 08/10/89
9502 1989(03) 04/15/fib
9902 1986(02) 01/31/06
9502 1987)05) 04/02/07
9521 1906 104a) 04/01/86
9520 1907)01) 01/01/87
9401 ,19921011 04/01/92
9520 1905 (05) 10/01/ eS
0520 19051031 09/01/85
9471 19B4)OS) 12/01/04
9470 1985)01) 02/01/05
9476 1991 (02) 10/01/91
9404 1986)02) 04/02/06
9433 1907 1141 07/20/87
9928 1905 109) 11/27/85
9528 1990102) 07/11/90
9523 1984)10) 12/18/04
9528 1986)1)) 12/10/86
9413 1986)09) 04/16/06
0502 1906102) 01/31/06
9920 1992)01) 10/15/92
0541 00-6 07/30/67
9433 1986)09) 02/24/06
9520 1905)11) 12/01/85
9522 1904 101) 12/01/04

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 73
•INTERIM STATUS AND SQG
‘INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SOC WASTE
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOXINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - STORAGE OF NAZARDOUS WASTE
CALL- IN OF STORAGE AND TREA’I74ENT APPLICATIONS
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
COMPLYING WIT)) RCRA INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS WNILE DEVELOPING A PERMIT APPLICATION
DETERMINATION ON WNETNER OR NOT A FACILITY OUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUS APPLICABILITY FOR CEMENT KILNS
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES. APPLIED
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE. CLARIFICATION
INTERIM STATUS UNDER THE BIF RULE
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION DF
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS
REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE AT DEPARTMENT OF EMERGY FACILITIES
REQUIREMENT THAT STATE-PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES HAVE INTERIM STATUS
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY 82 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE
USE OF PBTROLEUM-CONTAMIHATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
Protective Filere
‘INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WITHDRAWL
LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTREATED HAZARDOUS BASTE
INVENTORY
9521 19B6(OSB) 05/01/86
9528 1986(06) 07/01/86
9551 19B7(04( 01/01/87
9S51 1987(05) 02/01/87
9528 1988(06) 04/19/B8
9528 1987(10) 09/03/87
9S28 1986(09) 10/27/86
9498 1994(05) 07/14/94
952B 19B7(12) 09/1B/B7
9528 1986(10) 11/13/88
952B 1989(13) 10/15/89
9528 1991(03) 08/19/91
9494 1986(01) 02/09/86
952B 1991(02) 02/27/91
9528 1987(14) 11/12/87
9542 1980(01) 10/03/80
9541 1987 (04) 06/29/87
9541 00-6 07/30/87
9493 1991 (02) 06/20/91
9453 1991(01) 06/01/91
9551 1990(04) 10/03/90
(See Federal Fecilitiee(
IRON FOUNDRY WASTE
(See Listed Hazardoue Wane)
IRON SPONGE
(See Hazardoua Waete Identification)
JOINT PERMITTING
(See State Authorization)
K-WASTES
(See Lieted Hazardoua Waate)
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
(See Analytic Methode)
LABORATORY WASTES
XREF / /
XREF / /
XREF / /
XREF / /
XREF / /
XREF / /
‘EXCLUSION OF LABORATORY WASTES FROM THE MIXTURE RULE
‘LAB EXCLUSION, APPLICATION OF
‘LAS SAMPLE
‘LABORATORY AUDIT IHSPECTIDH
‘LASORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIH
‘SAMPLE EXCLUSION
XREF
9441 1996(06)
9441 1984(22)
9441 19B5(l2e)
9431 19a7(03(
9441 1985(11)
9441 1990(13e(
/ /
05/01/96
07/01/84
04 /0 1/85
07/01/87
03 /01/85
05/01/ 90

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Pegs 110. 74
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAB PACKS 9487 1985102) 05/10/85
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITH RADIOACTIVE PROPERTIES 9441.1985 126) 07/05/85
LABORATORIES, RCRA REGULATION IMPACT 9441.1990132) 11/28/90
LAEORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION 9441 19E5 103) 07/31/ES
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES. BEDDING. CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN 9444 1956130) 12/10/86
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATHENT STANDARDS p p ya PACKS 9554 1990113) 11/20190
PROPER DISPOSAL OF SILVER NITRATE AND CHLOROFORM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS 9441 1992(01) 02/23/93
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES 9441 1988 (39) 08/30/88
REGULATORY STATUS OF LABORATORY WASTEVATER 9441 1992 (01) 01/15/92
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL 9441 1989(12) 03/31/89
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR REGULATIONS APPLICABILITY 70 LABORATORIES 9441 1985 (34) 10/31/85
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS 9487 1986 (13) 12/31/86
TEST SAMPLES, EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS HASTE 9431 1989 (031 06/05/89
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9551 1991(15) 12/20/90
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE 9551 19916131 12/20191
LAND BAN
(See Land Disposal Restrictions) XREF / /
LAND DISPOSAL
(See Land Disposal Facilities) XREP / /
LAND DISPOSAL BAN
(See Land Disposal Restrictions) XREF / /
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
(See also Closure Process, Post-Closure. Minimum Technological Requirements. Land Disposal Restrlct lona Surface Impoundment) XREF / /
•COI4PLIANCE 70 DETECTION GROUNDWATER MONITORING, CHANGE FROM 6481 1985 (06) 12/01/85
•GROUNDWATER MONITORING ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES 9481 1986(04 ) 07/01/86
‘LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES 9484 1992(011 07/01/92
fl(ULTIEDURCE LEACHATE (F eD) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS 9444 1991 (06) 11/01/91
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION DEADLINES 9501 1990 (01 1 07/01/90
TREAI14EHT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOSING INTERIM STATUS BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OWN AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 9470 1985(011 02/01/85
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GU1DELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COIIIERC1AL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MID HAZARDOUS WASTE 9480 00-14 03/13/87
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS 9523 00-11 12/10/86
GRAY IRDN FOUNDRY WASTE DISPOSAL 9486 1981 (01) OS/IS/Si
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES NOT ON A PERMITT1NG OR CLOSURE SCHEDULE 9501 1987(011 09/17/87
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES 9476 1965(051 12/13/85
LOSE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTERIM STATUS AND PERMIT ISSUANCE 9528 1985 (091 11/27/85
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING, DEFINITION 9481 1985 (041 10/30/85
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 9475 19(5(041 09/25/85
ECRA 3ODt(f)(I)(b) AND STATES’ EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS 9433 1986(09) 14/16/fl
RORA FACILITY ASSESSMWNTS, IMPLSMENTATION 9502 00-4 08/21/86
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9923 00’14 03/14/86
VERTICAL EXPANSION AT U S ECOLOGY’S TRENCH 10. BRATTY. NEVADA FACILITY 9457 00-9 02/10/88
VULNERABLE IIYDROGEOLOGY GUIDANCE CRITERIA 9481 1967(03( 06/03/87
Gas Condensate
LANDFILL GAS CONDENSATE, REGULATION OF 9441 1985101) 01/11/85
Geologic Repositories
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTR IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES 9472 1986(04) 06/04/86

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 75
Land Disposal
“HAZARDOUS WASTE LIQUID-CONTAINING PIJMPE AND ‘ri lE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION 9551 1996(03) 06/01/96
“LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1987(051 02/01/87
“LOSS OF INTERIM STA’IVS - LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9528 1985(03) 09/01/85
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES. N 1 LAW 9487 1988(04) 03/26/es
CLARIFICATION OF “ACTIVE MANAGEMENT” IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS) 9484 1994(01) 04/06/94
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER 9493 1986(01) 01/22/86
EFFECT OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS OW PERMITS 95S1 1986(15) 09/15/86
EFFECTS OF ThE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 9451 1986(01) 03/17/86
R3UR4PTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE TEE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED 9493 1986(03) 08/21/86
NSWA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS 9480 LSBS(01) 04/01/85
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL IN PROXIMITY TO WETLANDS 9S51 1990(01) 05/09/90
INTERPRETATION OF 40 CPR 288 7 REQUIREMENTS 9554 1988(03) 05/13/88
LAND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES - USE OF NUCLEAR TEST SITES 9480 1984(01) 06/12/84
LAND DISPOSAL PERMIT STRATEGY 9501 1982(02) 12/29/82
LIHER/LEACHATR COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY 9487 1986(10) 08/07/86
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC WASTES 9S28,1990(02) 07/11/91
MIXED WASTE DISPOSAL FROM RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS 9SS4 1988(041 06/13/88
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NOW-REGULATED UNITS 9521 1985(01) 09/25/85
POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHEN DISPOSING OF CONTAMINATED DEBRIS 9477 1993(01) 10/04/91
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES 9502 1986(02) 01/31/86
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES 9441 1985(39) 11/25/85
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OILS NORCO, LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM 9432 1994(01) 02/01/94
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FRRTILIZPR 9441 1986(80) 10/20/86
Land Treatnant
“LAND TREATMENT 9486 1987(01) 01/01/87
“WASTE STORAGE IN A WASTE PILE 9485 1984 (01) 11/01/84
EULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS 9487 1986(09) 06/12/86
CLARIFICATION OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT” IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (SURFACE IMPOUNDNENTSI 9484 1994(01) 04/06/94
CLARIFICATIOH ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS AND ON POZIGLANIC STABILIZATION OF SORBED MATERIALS 9487 1993(01) 10/15/93
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS HASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS 9476 1991(01) 05/02/91
DEGRADATION, TRANSFORMATION OR IMMOBILIZATION IN TREATMENT ZONE 9486 1990(01) 04/27/91
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TEEkTHEWT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES 9486 1988(01) 01/02/88
INITIAL SOIL SURFACE TERM DEFINED IN LAND TREATMENT REGULATIONS 9486 1988(02) 04/11/88
LAND TREATMENT UNITS. DEPTH TO WATER TABLE REQUIRMENT 9486 1986(03) 07/15/86
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFE. WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITE, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF 9441 1984(37) 11/14/84
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1990(13) 11/08/90
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA 9551 1990(08) 10/24/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING & MARKETING, PA 9551 1991(06) 04/22/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR COHOCO, p 9551 1991(09) 05/29/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TX 9951 1991(03 ) 01/29/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING. OK 9551 1991(05) 02/05/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TIC 9551 1991(12) 12/10/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH S REFINING. TX 9551 1991(01) 01/03/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATNON PETROLEUM. IL 9551 1990(09) 11/06/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL 9551 1991(14) 05/01/91
NO-MIGRATIOM PETITION FOR SNELL OIL, WA 9951 1990(11) 11/07/90
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK 9551 1990(121 11/08/90
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE. DR 9551 1990(101 11/07/40
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK 9551 1991 (03) ot/i7/9 1
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA 9551 1991(08) 05/29/41
POSTPONEMENT OF A LAND TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION FOR NAVAJO REFINING CO , ARTESIA. NM 9524 1989(03) 03/23/69
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TRAM ‘(PAT) COI0’IENTE 9523 00-12 03/30/87
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) CQIO4ENTE 9523 00-15 03/30/88
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS/LAND TREATMENT WIlTS REGUI.ATION IF ASSOCIATED lINT SLUDGES ARE LISTED 9480 1985(02) 07/17/85

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 76
Landfill
EXISTING UNITS AND MINIMU14 TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS 9487.1986(14) 12/01/86
•I(AZARDOUS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE 9476 1986 (021 09/01/86
•LANDFILLS WITH HP TOXIC LEACHATE, REGULATION 9407 1984 (04) 08,01/84
qION-HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BAN 9487 1985(06) 09/01/85
REGULATION OF LRACMxyE COLLRCflON 495 9187 1996(01) 0fl01(96
RESAMPLING AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9481 1996(01 1 10/01 196
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES, N .1 LAW 9487 1986104) 03 126/86
ASSORBRNTS FOR CONTAINERIIED LiQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES, USE OF 9487 1985405) 09/20/85
BAN OW DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS 9487 1985 (03) 05/29/OS
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS 9487 1986(07) 04/27/86
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9487 1987101) 01/20/87
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS 9487 1986109) 06/12/86
CLARIFICATION ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS AND ON PO1ZOLANIC STABILIZATION OF SORBED MATERIALS 9487 1993(11) 10/15/93
CLOSURE PLAN FOR ‘fl(E HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC’S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANI’ 9488 1981 (01) 02/09/87
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 9476 00-12 03/02/88
CONTAINERIZED AND SULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS 9487 1986(12) 12/30/86
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAS PACES 9487 1985(023 oS/ so/ Os
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACNLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF 9451 1906(06) 12/15/06
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACNATE LEVELS 9441 1906 (03) 01/07/80
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES 9476 1905(05) 12/13/05
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFa, WASTE PILES. AND (21’ UNITE. HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF 9441 1904(37) 11/14/04
LINER/LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM CONPATIBILITY 9487 1906(10) 00/07/06
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS 9407 1985(04) 00/07/05
PCB-CONTAI4IHATED WASTES. STABILIZATION OF 9407 1988(01) 02/03/88
POST-CLOSURE PRRI41T REQUIREMENTS (flM 5 ) 9522 1906(03) 11/20/00
PRONIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL 9487 1985(10) 12/OS/fl
PROHIBITION ON THE PLACEMENT OF OULR LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE IN LANDFILLS - STATUTORY INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE 9407 00-2A 06/11/86
REDESIONATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS 9528 1980(02) 05/11/08
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES 9407 1986(00) 05/27/86
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES 9431 1986(21 ) 12/13/86
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS BADIEBIES, CAPACITORS, LAR PACKS 9407 1906(13) 12/31/OS
STANDARDS AGAINST WHICH 3804(o) (23 EQUIVALENCY PETITION SHOULD RE COMPARED - DOUBLE LINER 9487 1986411) 21/04106
SUESURFACR FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL 9431 1991(01) 01/26/91
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE SRANCN PERMItTING COMMENTS 9523 00-17 09/02/80
SUMMARY OF PERMIT AEEIETANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS 9521 00-12 03/30/07
TEL GASOLINE SLUDGE DISPOSAL 9553 1909(01) 07/20/89
Landfill Gao
GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS 9407 1906(03) 03/OS/OS
Wane Pilea
•CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE FILE 9522 1988 (01) 02/01/00
•RRSAMPLING AND OROUIIDWATER MONITORING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9401 1996(01 1 10/01/96
•WASTE PILE LINERS - I4TR (264 251) 9485 1905(01) 03/01/os
RASTE STORAGE IN A WASTE PILE 9405 1904(01) 11/01/84
ADJACENT WASTE PILES INTO REGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, PLACEMENT OF (CIBA-GEIGfl 9404 1907(06) 06/26/07
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS I CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES. CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/07 9522 1988(OS) 11/30/08
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION BUN-OFF AT LFa, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITE, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF 9441.1904(37) 11/14/04
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) 9523 00-12 03/30/07
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED. FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF 9432 1907(02) 04/02/07
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS. APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1980 DEADLINE TO 9901 1985(01) 10/01/05
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
EMPTY CONTAINERS
EREF / /
9441 1986(98) 12/01/06

-------
0 7 /06/99 KEYWoRD U I DEX Page No 77
‘LAJO DISPOSAL RESTRICTION 9941 1967(10 ) 12/01 / 67
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFINITIONS 9551 1966(231 12/01186
‘PCB WASTES AS HAZARDOUS WASTSS 9441 3996 )081 09/01/96
‘PROHIBITION ON STORAOS OP RESTRICTED WASTES 9453 1986106) 11/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF ‘SUPZRPUWD LOS GUIDES’ 9951 1991(141 01/07/91
APPLICABILITY OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO THE WASTE CODS CARRY TWEOLEIFI PRINCIPLE 6951 1991(031 06/19(51
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECtS OF 40 CPR 256 DEBRIS AEOUIATIOI4S 6591 1994(01 ? 10/06194
CLARIFICATIGN OF NEWLY LISTRD WASTES AND HAZARDOUS DEBRIS ES54 1992101 1 21/05/92
OOI10CO PART B PERMITS 9953 1990(011 05 111 ( 90
DO MERCURY BATtERIES RECOVERED PEON THE WASTE NEAR AiD TO NAVIGATION IATON) STRUCTURES SATISFY THE DEFLNITIO1I OF DEBRIS 5991 1991(031 04(03/97
LAB PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTI ONS ASPECTS 6551 1550102) os/ON/ S i
LAND BAN ISSUES - 1989 UPDATE 9551 1988(06) 06/16/88
LAND DISPOSAL RSSTRICI IONS APPLIED TO EXPORTED WASTES 9551 1991 )071 04/21/91
LAND DISPOSAL RRSTESCTIONE CLARIFICATIONS 9593 1987101) 0 1/2O/E
1.5140 DISPOSAL REsTRICTIONS EFFECT 01) PERMITS 9512 00 -1 09/15/97
1.5110 DISPOSAL RESTRICtIONS WASTE IDENTIFICATIDN REQUIRINENTE FOE ORGANIC HAZARDOUS WASTES 9591 1994(02) 12(05 /94
LEAD SNEILDIND POE I1ADOOACTIL’S WASTE IS A ECRA SOLID WASTE 9444 1991(02) 04/30/91
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT O 10S 9469 1991(09) 02/22/91
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL. 9441 1990 1151 06/14/90
RCEA POLICY STATEMEI IT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DILIFFION PROHIRITION 5110 COMBUSTION OF INORGANIC KETAL-BEAEINO HAZARDOUS HASTES 9991 01-01 05/23/94
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS WHERE PRECIOUS METALS ABE RECLAIMED 5551 19691031 12/20/99
ASOULATIDNS FOE DISPOSAL OP CERAMIC MATERIALS 9441 19921221 47/21/90
SHi l l INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF E049-E092 WASTES IN CEMENT EII.W5 AND INDUSTRIAL PURNACES 1991 10 1 ) 03/19/91
BOAT
‘AEII&3ECTBD OEOUNDWATRE RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREATMENT 9954 1991 (031 04/01/91
•TREAII4RIRT STANDARDS - SORT 9554 1996(64 ) 11/01/66
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO ERINJECTION OP TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER USWES CERCLA AND SCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 9964 1969(691 12/20/99
CLARIPICATIOI6 Oil THE APPLICABILITY OF THE DRRRIS STANDARDS TO 9078 WASTES 9954 1994(611 01/04/94
DETRRMINATIGR( OP EQUIVALENT TREATMENT lOST) FOE 9 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOWERS DIISOC4AIIATE (ml) TAEATABILITY GROUP 9554 1994106) 10/24/94
DSTEBMINATION OP EQUIVALENT TESATNERT POE MATAL RECOVERY 9554 2992(02) 12/ 54/92
PERFORMANCR AND SAFE APPLICABILITY OF COLD-MIS TEC)DIOLGOIRZ AND BIOEEI4EDIATICN FOE PRTRDLEUM-CONTAI IIWATED SITES 9502 19911031 04(24/96
PLACEMENT OP STABILIZED WASTES THAT 110 IEIT MEET LAND RRSTRICTIDN REOUIREI4ENTS 9954 1989(02) 09(69/69
PROPOSED BEST D CNSTRA1BO AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) FOE 11061 WASTE 9441 1988(061 03/09/66
TECHNICAl. SUPPOAT DOCUMENT FOR iDA? 9593 19981041 12/30/86
TEL GASOLINE 5) 120 11 5 DISPOSAL 9593 1999(011 07(29/69
TREATMENT STANDARD FOE E 1OS (1.0W MERCURY SUBCATRGORT1 NON-WASTRWATEE RESIDUES PEON EBTDETING/ROASTIIC (RPIERC) UNITS 9994 1994404) 01(14 194
Bulk L iquids
‘STORAGE PEIOR TO RECYCLING 9479 1967(111 04(01/81
APPLICABILITY OF WE PAINT PILTRE LIQUIDS TEST TO RORBENTS 9443 1993406) 10/12/93
RULE LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9487 1961(011 01/20/87
CLARIFICATION ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN hAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS AIID ON POZZOLANIC STABILIZATION OP SORBED MATERIALS 9487 1949(011 10( 15/SI
CONTAINBRISEO AND SULE HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN ECRA I.ANDV ILLE 9487 1986(12) 12/30/66
DISPOSAL OF SORBED LIQUIDS 1 PARTICULARLY TEIOOEGRADASLE’ SORSENTS IN WASTES DESTINED FOR I(AZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS 9551 1993 (02 ) 05/09/93
PCR-cONTAI4IRATED WASTES. STASILIZATION OP 9487 19861011 02/03/88
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL 1999)10) 32/09/99
PROHIBITION ON WE PLACEMENT OF BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE IN LANDFILLS - STAJ1JTORY INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE 9487 00-2A 00/11/61
REGULATORY STATUE AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSDR8ENT MATER IALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS 9591 1993(041 11/11/91
SU)44AR1 OP PERM1T ASSISTANCE TEAM (PATI COMMENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/66
California L IE C
CALIFORNIA LIST 9954 1961103) 07/01 197
.1 / ut DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CALIFORNIA LIST 9551 1967 (09) 03/01(91
‘LA uD DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CALIFORNIA LIST fl 1967113a) 09/01/91
‘1.5140 DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - NALOOSNATED ORGA3ILC 9993 1983(131 09/01/87
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS POINT OF GENERATION 95S4 19 19(031 (0/01/89

-------
07/06/58
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 78
‘MIXED WASTE AND LAND SAN
APPROPRIATE TREATHENT METhODS FOB ELEMENTAL MIRCIJRY
CALIFORNIA LIST HOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
CALIFORNIA LIST LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO LIQUID WASTES
CALIFORNIA LIST LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS. EPA’s IMPLEMSN’rATION OF
CALIFORNIA LIST PROHIBITIONS APPLiCABILITY AFTER THIRD THIRD RULE
COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LIST FINAL PULl
HAZARDOUS WASTES CONTAINING HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (NOCs)
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMiNE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
RESTRICTED WASTE DEPIBITION
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES A110 THE DILUTION PROHIBITION
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES UNDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIRENSNTS
9551 1989(02) 03101189
9553.1981(16) ii/ LB/I7
9994 19891041 11/75/89
9553 1987(091 09/18 187
9SS3 9.997(14) 10/15 187
9551 1991(11) 09127191
95S1 1987(21) lb/fl/B ’
9551 1989(01) 01/06/99
9553 1987(151 12/03/87
9591 9987(161 09104117
9551 1987 (231 11/13/rn?
95S1 1908 (011 05 ,05188
PSSI 3992102)
9551 1987(08)
9551 1993101)
9551 1987(18)
9551 1986(11)
9551 1990(09 )
9555 1957(01)
9551 1987(12)
9553 1993(01)
9551 1987(021
9551 1917(06)
09 /01/92
01/01 / 87
01/03/93
07/18/97
5 8/ 11/ 06
0 8/ 1 1/59
10/02/87
06/26/57
08 /06/93
0 1/13/17
0 3/10/87
Free I.tq’si.de
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE LIQUID-CONTAINING PUMPS ANt) THE LIQUIDS iN LANDFiLLS PROHIBITION
‘LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS. DEFINITION OP
‘THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS
BAll DN USE OF LIQUIDS 1W LANDFiLLS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHII(G PIELDS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS • WASTE IDE(ITI FICATION
CONTAiNERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
LIQUID WASTE. DEFINITION DF
PAINT FILTER LiQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
PERFORMANCE AND PERMITTING STANDARDS III 3004 C M • PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIDUIDS
SOLIDIFICATION OP CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTSS AIC TNE DILUTION PROHIBITION
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OP
Lund Disposal Bun
• LAND DISPOSAL BAlI - TRACES OF NATURALLY OCCURR 1110 BENZUIE AND TOLUENI
‘LAND DISPOSAL BAN OF SOLVENTS
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT 9180 DIDNIN WASTES
‘NDN-I)AIASDOUS LiQUIDS BAN
‘ONE-TINE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT UNDER 268 7 (a) (6)
‘STORAGE OP RESTRICTED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OP RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CEECLA RESPONSE ACTIONS
APPROPRIATE TREATHENT METHODS FOR ELEMENTAL MERCURY
DRY CLEANING CARTR100R FILTERS, DiSPOSAL OF
1.93)0 DISPOSAL 9RQNSBITIOI) RULE FOR SOLVENTS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIQES EFFECT DN STOEAGE/DISPORAL OF COMMERCiAL MIXED WASTE
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING iNDUSTRY
pEEI4rrrrNG AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUSRD4EHTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
RISK-BASED METHODOLOGIES ON LAND D1SPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SMALL-VOLUME MIXED WASTE LABORATORY GENERATED MATERIALS AND LEAD
95S1 1996(03) 06 ,01196
9432 1955403) 05/01105
9407 1995901) ot/O 1/95
9407 19E6(07( 04/27/86
9487 1986(099 06112/06
944S 1987(038 1 11/97/87
9407 1906112) 12139/86
943) 1981 (09) 06/70’/Ol
9553 1987(191 12/01/07
9489 1989(01) 89/20185
9551 1993(04) 11/17/93
9551 19871231 11/11/07
9449 1984(06? 01/30/04
9951 1506)12 ) 04/11/8 1
9551 1986(83) 02/01/06
0553 1908(01) 07101108
9487 1981106) 09/01/85
9551 1992901) 07/01/92
9551 1506924) 12/01/IS
9553 15E9902) 11/13/89
9553 1987116) 11/10/El
9553 1186 (03) 12/11/14
9593 1987) 12) 08/10/11
9555 00-01 09/29/SD
9554 1987(021 02103 167
9502 1986(11) 06/16/56
9551 1996(07) 06/19/06
9551 1981407) 06 113/ eS
Case-by-Case EXtension
‘FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULSS AS DEBRIS
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOIINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION
‘SOIL CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION PETITION. INFORNATION REQUIRED
CARE-BY-CASE EXTENSION UNDER THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS. INFORMATION REQUIRED
EXTENSION DF APPLICABLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TI lE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
EXTENSIONS TO S7OEAGE PROIIIRITIDN AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
GENERATOR REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION PROM OR EXTENSION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
HAZARDOUS DEBRIS CASE -S I -CASE CAPACITY VARIANCR RENEWAL
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS, EXEMPTIONS TO
SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE SOLIDIFIED WITH VERMICULITE

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD noex Page NO 79
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS. SCOPE OF SUBPART K 9409 1908111) 05/ 18/88
National Variance
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - 1% NATIONAL VARIANCE (5OLVtFTS) 9551 1907(24) ii/o1/87
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN WASTES 9553 1908(01) 02/01/00
‘ (IDE REQUIREMENTS DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE 9551 1990(16) 12/01/90
‘VARIANCES It RAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND 0 00XINS 9551 1986(22) 12/01/06
ASSESTOS/LEAD/SQ IL/Dt5t15 AS INORGANIC SOLID 9551 1990t141 12111190
NULTI-SOURCE LEACI6ATE AND TREATHEI4T STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICT1ONS 9SS4 1990(08) 07/31/90
NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEBRIS 9551 1990(07) 10/14/90
NON-APPLICABILITY OF THE LESS-THAN- l i EETENS0ON TO TREATMENT RESIDUALS 9SS3 1987(11) 07/16/87
PROCESS WASTEWATER PROM METAL DSGREASIMG OPERATIONS 9553 1989(02) 01/OS/SB
RESIDUALS FROM TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED WASTES NOT COVERED NY LESS-TNAN-19 SOLVENT EXTENSION 9953 1901 (07) 04/27/87
SOLVENT-NEARING WASTEWATRE, SLUDGE, AND BRINE TREATEI AND STORED IN SURFACE 1MPOUNOMENTS 9S53 1987(01 ) 01/12/87
HASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT ‘110 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL R 1OVED 5441 1907(53 ) 06/29/87
No-Migration Variance
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS VARIANCES 8551 19861191 10/01/86
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DISPOSAL OF WASTES GRANTED A VARiANCE 9591 1988(05) 05/01/BR
APPLICABILITY OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO NIPP-DESTINSD TRANSURANIC MIXED WASTE 9469 199S (01) 02/00/96
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA’S LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM TO LAND TREATMENT OR LANDFARNING 9554 1997104) 03/20/97
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANE SYSTEMS 9403 1900(04 ) 03/16/86
CONOCO’S NO-M iGRATION PETITION oENIpj 9 3 1990104) 09/24/90
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS 9S51 1980(15) 01/21/80
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL SSFINERIES 9486 1988)01) 01/02/88
LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTRSATSD HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1990)041 10/03/90
WO-M1G9A’TION PEIFflON FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1590113) 11/08/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS. WA 9551 1990(00) 10/24/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR CONOCO, MT 9551 1991(09) 05/29/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, 9551 1991(03) 01/29/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING. OK 0551 19911051 02/OS/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCN REFINING, 9551 19911121 12/10/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCNS REFINING. TX 9551 19911011 01/03/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON P9TSOLE109, IL 9551 1990(091 1 1/06/50
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL 9551 1991(141 05/03/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SNELL OIL, WA 9551 1990(11) 11/07/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, 06 9551 1990(12) 1 1/ 08/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, 9551 1990 (101 1l/D7/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING. OR 9551 1991)021 01/17/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA 9551 1991(08) 05/29/91
PLACSMENT OF STARILIZED WASTES THAT DO NOT MEET LAND RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS 9554 1909(02) 05/OS/09
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATNWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC 4 EMICRLS 9551 1091 1041 01/30/51
THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON WCO6NAIARDO4JS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONtROL WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITE 9554 1994)021 01/05/94
NDIIfiCat lOn
‘EXPORT OP RESTRICTED WASTE 9551 1997)221 10/01/87
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DECHARACTERIZED MINED WASTE 5WT TO AN ATOMIC ENERGY ACT I.ANDFILL 9551 1997101) 0 1/01/97
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CORROSIVE WASTE 9551 1907(19) 09/01/87
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS 9551 1989(041 0 5/ 01/Si
‘ONE-TIME NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT UNDER 268 7(a)(6) 9551 1992)011 17/01/92
‘SOP? KA09(ER C5NTIFICATIONS/DU4ONSTRATIONS 9551 1988113) 11/01/85
CLARIFICATION OF TNS LDR PHASE II REGULATION THAT APPEARRD IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTDWER 19 1994 9551 1995101) 02/10/99
DISPOSAL FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CERTIFICATION 9551 1987 107) 03/10187
DOES THE UNIVERSAL WASTE FINAL RULE SUBJECT CERTAIN WASTE TYPES TO SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS 1996(01) 04/17/9S
INTNRPRHTATION OF 40 CFR 268 7 RSQUIREMRWTS 9554 1988(02) 05/13/80
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR A HAZARDOUS CORROSIVE WASTENATER 9551 1997(04) 05/01/97
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TRSTING AND RECORD EBEPING REQUIREMENTS 9551 190R(01) 09/13/08

-------
07 /06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO. 80
NO’IIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SNIPPiNG RESTRICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FAC1LITY
ON-SITE TREATMENT OF MANHOLE SEDIMENT WHICH MAY EXCEED THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANtITY GENERATORS SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO TI lE EDILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
9551 1987(20) 10/28/87
9553 1994(011 06/23/94
9454 19941011 05/09/94
9494 1994103 ) 06/07/94
9551 1991(13) 12/20/91
9451 1991(02)
9554 1987)03)
9554 1991(02)
9441 1995)12)
9551 1988 (02)
9554 1986 (05)
9441 1990(18)
9551 1995(02)
9554 1990(01)
9551 1986(08)
9551 1988(10)
9553 1987(13)
9551 1997(02)
9554 1990(04)
9554 1990(12)
9551 1990(01)
9551 1988(13)
9554 t991(O4)
9487 1995)01)
9554 1986(03)
9554 1997)05)
9433 1986(24)
9554 1994 (03)
9441 1994(14)
9554 1997(04)
9554 1989(05)
954 1.1986(13)
9442 1990(02)
9441 1990(11)
9554 1989(04)
9551 1991(10)
9551 1996(01)
9551 1995(01)
9441 1995(32)
9554 1994(013
9441 1994(26)
9551 1990(05)
9554 1990(02)
9554 1994 (063
9554 1994 (05)
9554 1997(021
9554 1990(051
9551 1988(12)
9554 1995(01)
9554 .1990 (09)
9554 1986(01)
9554 1991 (01)
9551 1990(06)
9554 1990(13)
9554 1990)11)
03/01/91
07/01/87
01/01/91
03/01/95
0 5/ 0 1/ S b
12/01/86
06/01/90
03/01/96
01/01/ 90
07/01/ 85
09/01/88
09 /0 1 /87
01/01/97
03/0 1 /Sb
08/01/90
09/0 1/90
1 1/0 1/ 88
12/01/91
01/01/95
12/01/86
04/01/97
32/03/86
02/16/94
06/09/94
03 /20/97
12 /2 0/8 9
06 /24/8 6
11/08/90
04/12/90
11/28/89
06/05/El
02 /27/96
02/10/95
09/15/95
01/04/94
09/28/94
10/09/90
02/22/90
10/24/94
07/26/94
02/11/97
06/25/90
11/04/88
06/14/9,5
08/11/90
03/27/86
01/OR /91
10/14/90
11/20/90
08/ 14/90
T C OA L I 1 0 0 L S LEn 4ArdE
‘AMENDMENTS TO PART 262 NAEARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION AND RECDRDEEEPING REQUIREMENTS
‘CALIFORNIA LIST
‘CLASSI FICATION OF LEACHATS CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
‘DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE
‘DILUTION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTED WASTE
‘DILUTION TO MEET TREATMENT STANDARDS
‘FOOl-FOOS WASTEWATER DEFINITION
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON COMPLIANCE WITH PART 268 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TREATMENT STANDARDS
‘LAS PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
‘LAND DISPOSAL PROHIBITION
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - FIRST THIRD
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - HALOGENATED ORGANIC CARBONS
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS STORAGE PROHIBITION AND DECHARACTRRISED WASTES
‘METHANOL TREATMENT STANDARDS
‘POINT OF GENERATION - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
‘PRETREATMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTES SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICT IONS
‘SOFT HAI04ER CERTIFICATIONS/DEMONSTEATIONS
‘5W-846 TEST METNODS
THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS
‘TREATED WASTES - MAX IMU14 CONCENTRATIONS
‘TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR D008 RADIOACTIVE LEAD TANKS AND CONTA INRES
‘VAR LANCE FROM A TREATMENT STANDARD
ACCEPTABILITY UNDER THE RCRA LAND DISPOSAl , RESTRICTIONS OF NO METHODS OF MACROENCAPSULATION FOR MIXED WASTES AT ROCKY FLATS
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO VARIOUS PRODUCTS (E G • CLINKER. FERTILISER) PRODUCED BY A CEMENT KILN EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRURBER
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA’S LAND DISPOSAL BRSTRICTIO11S PROGRAM TO LAND TREATMENT OR LANDFARMING
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO REINJECTION OF TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CERCLA AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
AUTNOSISATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
BIAS CORRECTION APPLIED TO THE TCLP
CADMIUW WASTES FROM MILITARY COATING MATERIALS
CALIFORNIA LIST HOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LORa
CLARIFICATION OF THE ‘MIXTURE RULE.’ THE ‘CONTAINED-IN’ POLICY, LDR ISSUES, AND ‘POINT OF GENERATION’ FOR UO96
CLARIFICATION OF THE LOS PHASE II REGULATION THAT APPEARED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 19. 1994
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA ‘CONTAINED- IN’ POLICY
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILlTY OF THE DEBRIS STANDARDS ‘IX) POPS WASTES
CLARIFICATION ON. MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. P003, P005 . 0001, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING. AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATSO REPLACEMENT UNDRR A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
0001 CHARACTERISTIC WASTES - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
OSTERM1NATION OF EQUIVALENT ‘IRSATMENT tORT) FOR S OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DI ISOCYANATE (701) TRSATABI LITY GROUP
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OP USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS
DETERMINATION WHETHER SOLIDIFICATION OP AN EVAPORATOR CONCENTRATE WASTE STREAM ACHIEVES THE LOR TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS
F024 REVISED TREATMENT’ STANDARDS
GENERATION AND TREATMENT OF E044 WASTE
INTERPRETATION OP THE PHRASE ‘WHICH CAN ES REASONABLY EXPECTED TO RE PRESENT’ FOB SOIL THAT RENOROTS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
ROOt. P093, AND U059 CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT STANDARDS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS BEARING OW PEA 24, 1986 RESPONSES
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OP CYANIOES
LOR DETSBMINATION OP WASTE STREAM DILUTION
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACKS
LEAD AND ARSENIC WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page NO El
LEAD-SEARING WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS 9554 1990(06) 06/25/99
LEADED PAINT SANDELASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP 9442 1991(01) 01/09/91
MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE MID TREATMENT STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9554 1990 100) 07/31/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING S MARKETING PA 9551 1991(061 04/22/91
pERMI1 TING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOIL WHICH IS HAZARDOUS OR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1996)04) l l/ 2 7/9d
RECYCLING OF K061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CMOEHT 9441 1990(03) 02/13/90
REGULATION OF FUEL ELENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES 9521 1994(01) 10/17/94
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TWO WASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD RE RILAYRRED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TED? 9441 1994 (27) 10/04/94
RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OP A TRRATARILITY VARIANCE 9594 1997)03) 03/11/97
RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDING HAEARDOUS WASTE IDENTIPICATION AND GENERATOR REGULATIONS 9452 1993(03) 10/20/93
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ROlLER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE 9494 1994(03) 06/07/94
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE (TCI) 9551 1957(13) 06/26/07
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9444 1957(10) 05/20/57
SUBMARINE REACTOR COMPARTMENTS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9554 1990(07) 07/30/90
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF WOOD PRESERVING WASTES 9554 1990(15) 09/26/90
THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON NONIIAZA3IDOUS UNDERGROUND INJRCT(ON CONTROL WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS 9554 1994(02) 01/09/94
TREATMENT OF AN INHERENTLY HAZARDOUS DERRIS THAT EXHIRITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD AND CADMIUM 9554 1993(02) 11/15/93
TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES AT HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITTED TED? 952S 1990(02) 10/17/90
TREATMENT STANDARD FOR K106 (LOW MERCURY SUSCATEGORY) NON-WASTEWATER RESIDUES FROM RETORTING/ROASTING IRMERCI UNITS 9554 1994(04) 07/14/94
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND TEN SEVILLE EZCLUSION 9554 1990(10) 05/23/90
TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN MINED RADIOACTIVE 9554 1990(14) 12/27/90
USE OF ON-SITE PRECIPITATION PROCESS AS AN ACCEPTABLE PRETREATMENT STEP ADJUNCT TO MERCURY RETORTING 95 1992(011 06/03/93
USE OF SITE-SPECIFIC LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TREATARILITY VARIANCE DURING CLEANUPS 9954 1997(01) 01/08/97
VOLUNTARY TREATMENT PRIOR TO LA2ID DISPOSAL 9553 1957 (03) 01/20/07
WASTE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS IN INCOMING WASTE SHIPMENTS - LDR 9951 1957(10) 06 112/57
WASTE CODES AND TREATMZHT RESIDUES 9554 1990(03) 03/07 190
WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING F006 ELECTROPLATING WASTES 1905)091 00/11/00
LAND TREATMENT
(See Lend Diapoee l FacIl It leR) XREF / /
LANDFILL
(See Lend Dtepoeal Faci l ltiee) XREP / /
LANDFILL GAS
(See Land Dsepoeel Fecil itsee) XREF / I
LARGE QUANTITY HANDLER
(SEE UNIVERSAL WASTES) REEF ( I / /
LARGE VOLUME WASTE
(See Mining Weete) IRE ? / /
LEACHATE
(See eleo Append lx VIII) XREF / /
•CLASSIFICATIONOF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9554 1991(02) 11/01/91
•MULTISOURCE LEACHATE (P0391 WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS 9444 1991(06) 11/01/91
TEEATMENT TANKS FOR LEACNATE OR LIQUID WASTES 9471 1904(01) 03/01/04
DELISTING CEITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS 1956(011 31/07/86
DETECTION LIMIT FOR EP-LEACHATE CONCENTRATION OF SELENIUM 1906(06 ) 03/12/56
EXCLUSION PROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986(03) 01/07/56

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Ho 02
SEE?
EREF
EREF
9432 1905)03)
9443 1983103)
9471 1984(01)
9487 1985(03)
9443 1995(03)
9476 1983(02)
9407 1905(02)
9443 1987(11)
9443 1993)01)
9444 2909)04)
9432 1990(01)
9441. 1909 (51)
9407 2905(043
9432 2981(01)
9432 1989(04)
9574 1905 (01)
9487 1984(05)
9442 1907(18)
9441 1959(14)
/ 1
/ /
/ /
05/01/05
02/03/83
03 (0 i / O
05/29/05
09/19/95
02/11/43
05/10/45
08/16/87
09/06/91
07/13/09
02/16/90
10/05/89
08/07/85
06/20/01
07/20/89
01/22/85
11/12/84
08/19/07
07/06/99
9441 1986(03) 11/13/86
9441 1995(05) 02/17/95
9441.1994(371 11/14/04
9441.1983(00) 10/22/83
9484.1905)02b) 11/14/85
REEF
XREF
ERR?
ICES ?
/ /
/ F
/ /
/ /
GROUNDWATER CONTAMiNATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OF? AT (as, WASTE PILES, AND (fl UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, REGULATION OF
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEIVING LEACHATE, REGULATION OF
LEACHATE COLLECTION/DETECTION SYSTEM
(See MinieTun Technological Requirements)
LEAD
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
LEAK DETECTION
(See Secondary Containment)
LEAKAGE
(See Secondary Containment)
LIABILITY
(See Financial Responsibility)
•FINANCIA(. STATEMENT REQUIRE)4EWT FOR IRE RCRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST
LIABILITY COVERAGR
(See Financial Reaponeibi lity)
LINERS
(See )4inintue Technological Requirements) (See also Land Disposal Facilities)
LIQUID WASTE
(See also Land Disposal Reatrictiona, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
•LIQUIDS AJ(D FREE LIQUIDS, DEFINITION OF
•PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE
•TREATHENT TANKS FOE LEACHATE DR LIQUID WASTES
BAN ON DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
CLARIFICATION OF THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITARILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS
CLOSURE 6 POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAB PACKS
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED DO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES
DETERMINATION OF THE IGNITAS1LITY CHARACTERISTIC
DISTILLATION BUfl’OM TARS AS E022 WASTE
IGNITARILITY OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION
LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE OR CORROSIVE WASTIS
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS
LIQUID WASTE. DEFINITION OF
LIQUID. FEES LIQUID, EELSASARLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS
HDNNAZARLIOUS L iQUID WASTEWATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND MSWA, DISPOSAL OF
PLACEMENT OF BULK LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL, REGULATION OF LIQUID
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
XBEF / /
9477 1996)01) 1 1/0 1/96

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO 83
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OF 9445 1984(06) 07/30/84
Absorbente
ADDING ABSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS
LAB PACKS AT GENERATOR SITES
ABSORBENTS FOR CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES, USE OF
APPLICABILITY OP THE PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO SORBENTS
APPLICABILITY OP USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORRENT MATERIALS
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
DISPOSAL OF SORBED LIQUIDS, PARTICULARLY BIODEGRADABLE” SORBENTS IN WASTES DESTINED FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS
POSITION PAPER ON SPENT ABSORBENT MATERIALS
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS
REGULATORY STATUS OF ABSORBENT MATERIAL WHEN MIXED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION
Bulk Liquide
•STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
PLACEMENT OF STABILIZED WASTES THAT DO NOT MEET LAND RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
SUMMARY OP PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
Non-Hazardous Liquids
BAN OH USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
(See alec Solid Waste, Delieting, Characteristic Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification. Dioxin)
DELISTING BY STATES
• HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS
•SPSNT SOLVENTS IN SCINTALLATIOH COCKTAILS
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CHEMICAL AGENTS GB, VX, AND HX AT MUNITIONS DISPOSAL FACILITY
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATHBNT PROCESS
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL
E006 WASTE AND DNSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
EO3S LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS
LDSO AS CRITERIA FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
LISTING OP TP-1, AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN THE F006 LISTING, NGN-INCLUSION OF
MIXTURE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC
PETITION TO WITHDRAW )1090 AND E091 LISTINGS
PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE EOS1 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING IHES, PAINTS. AND ADHESIVES
9453 1990)02) 07/01/90
9453 1988)02) 01/01/88
9487 198S (OS) 09/20/ES
9443 1993)06) 10/12/93
9592 1994(09) 09/28/94
9487 1987(01) 01/20/87
944S 1987(03e) 11/17/87
9487 1986(12) 12/30/86
9551 1993 (02) 05/05/93
9441 1991(09) 06/21/91
9487 1985(10) 12/OS/ES
9551 1993)04) 11/17/93
9441 1992)29) 09/04/92
9475 1987 (01) 04/01/87
9487 1987 (01) 01/20/87
9487 1986(09) 06/12/86
9487 1986)12) 12/30/86
9487 1988(01) 02/03/88
9554 1989(02) 05/05/89
9487 1985)10) 12/05/85
9523 00-14 03/14/86
9487 1986(07) 04/27/86
XREF
9541 1986)24)
9441 1986(74)
9444 1989(02c)
9441 1997(14)
9441 1986)26)
9443 1984)03)
9433 1986(01)
9444 1986(33)
9444 1986(07)
9441 1986(82)
9441 1986 (03)
9444 1987(26)
9432 1987(09)
9444 1987)52)
9443 1988)09)
9442 19ae(04)
9441 1986 (73)
9444 1986)13)
9441 1985(32)
9441 1987(06)
9441 198S(38)
9444 1999(11)
9444 1987)20)
9441 1987(09)
//
10/01/86
09/01/86
03/01/89
03/06/87
04/02/8 6
o6/o4/ p4
01/07/86
12/29/86
04/07/86
11/08/ 86
01/07/86
07/02/87
08/19/87
12 /11/87
09/09/88
05/06/86
09/25/86
06/24/86
10/07/85
0 1/27/87
11/20/85
10/03/89
05/26/87
02/19/87

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 84
RECYCLED CHARACTERiSTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
REGULATORY REQUI REMENTS APPL ICABLE TO TWO WASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE BILAYERED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TED?
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINiNG TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS
RELISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
RESPONSE TO REGION III IMPLEMENTATION AND OVERSIGHT ISSUES
SCINTILLATION COCKTAiL , REGULATION OF LIQUID
SCRAP DEHP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DENP. DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OP A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPHATING PROCESS
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS
SPENT FLUIDIIED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES WIDER INTERIM STATUS
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE (NALCAST 60 15/WATER/WAX)
TOLURNE-CONTA ININO PAINT PRODUCTS FROM WOOD PIECES . REGULATORY STATUS
USED OIL, SLIRNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
WASTE CODE LISTINGS AND TECNNICAL CORRECTIONS
WASTE FROM ELECTROLESS PLATING PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED P0 16 LISTING
WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANE FOAM
Chlorination Tank
DRAGOUT FROM FOOT - SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH EOLUT IONS
Cozrnercial Checical Products
‘BERYLLIUM DUST (P015). APPLICABILITy
‘BURNING/BLENDING OP UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (KYLENE) WITH USED OIL
‘COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT DEPINIT1DN IN 261 33
‘DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT FOR SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION VS HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
‘DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION
‘DlSCARDED MERCURY THERMOMETERS
‘EPINEPNRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042
•FIO6 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
‘HAEARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
‘ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - NALOGENATED ORGANIC CARBONS
‘METHYL CHLOROFORM
‘NITROOLYCERIN PATCHES NUT LISTED HA1ARDOUS WASTE WHEN DISCARDED UNUSED
‘NITROGLYCERINE PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
‘OPF-EPECIFICATION CIRCUIT PRINTING BOARDS - REGULATORY STATUS
‘OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAFORMALDERYDE MEETS COI04ERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
‘RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS REGULATORY STATUS
‘SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
‘SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION
‘SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOR SPILLED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
‘SPILLS OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
‘USE AS INGREDIENT NOT WSTNIN SOLVENT LISTING
BATTERY RECONDITIONING
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCNLORIDE ARE HOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECI FICATIDN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7814. FEBRUARY 9. 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CARSON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WNICN PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED
CNLORDANE AND HEPTACNLOR PESTICIDE WASTE
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REDARDENO OIL AND OAS WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF NOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BRING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CLARIFICATION ON NOW REUSE OF ‘WASTE REEINE AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARK REGULATED UNDER RCRA
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT
CLASS I Fl CATION OF SOLVENTS ADDED TO PAINTS OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS AS REGULATED SPENT SOLVENTS EASED ON THE SOLVENTS STUDY
9441 1985)39) 11/25/85
9441 1994(27) 10/04/94
9441 1992(36) 10/28/92
9441 1992(11) 05/18/92
9442 1986(08) 08/21/86
9541 1986(10) 05/01/86
9443 1987(18) 08/19/87
9441 1985)23) 06/27/dS
9441 1984(05) 02/19/84
9444 1986(11) 05/22/86
9444 1986)27) 12/05/86
9444 1986)28) 12/05/86
9444 1985(15) 06/24/89
9443 1988 (01) 01/04/88
9441 1986 (40) 07/31/86
9444 1985(12) 10/05/89
9444 1987(51) 12/04/87
9441 1992(24) 08/17/92
9444 1984(14) 07/30/84
9444 1992 (061
9442 1985)01)
9444 1992)01 )
9441 1996(07)
9444 1987)37a)
9444 1989)05 )
9444 1994(10)
9441 1987)11)
9441 1986 (87)
9444 1995(02)
9553 1987413)
8444 1984(17)
9445 1995 401)
9444 1993)05)
9441 1991)14)
9442 1994)03)
9444 1992(07)
9441 1992)131
9441 1985)19a)
9441 1995)20)
9441 1987)18)
9444 1989)143
9444 1997)023
9441 1986)56)
9496 1994)01)
9441 1984)95)
9441 1995)28)
9444 1987)19)
9444 1988 (10)
9571 1993)02)
9441 1994)18)
9441 1994(19)
9441 1994425)
9441 1996(13)
11/01/92
12/0 1/ OS
03/01/92
08/01/96
08/01/ 87
08/01/89
12 /0 1/94
02/01/87
11/01/46
09/01/95
09/01/87
08/01/84
04 /0 1/95
09/01/93
08/01/91
03/01/94
11/01/92
09/01/92
05 /0 1/89
05/01/95
03 /0 1/87
11/01/89
06/01/97
07/28/86
12/16/94
12/23/86
08/24/95
05/18/87
05/03/88
11/05/93
07/11/94
07/11/94
09 /28/94
12 /24/96

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 85
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT P LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO UNUSED PRODUCT. NOT USED RESIDUES 9444 1906(29) 12/00/86
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS UNDER 261 9444 1900(01) 09/04/ES
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOBILES 9441 1905)02) 01/16/ES
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS. RECYCLING A MIXTURE OP 9441 1906 134) 04/20/06
CONTAINERS THAT HELD COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, DEFINITION OF 9441 19E4(26) 09/11/04
CONTAINERS USED TO HOLD LISTED fl( jtfl py DRUDS 9441 1907(45) 06/16/01
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER 9493 1906 (01) 01/22/04
CORROSIVE SOLIDS, COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, EEACTIYE WASTES DEFINED 5443 1904(091 11/29/04
DESIGNATION OP AMERICIUM BERYLLIUM SOURCES UNDER RCRA 9441 1992(17 ) 06/16/92
D1METNYL BENZENE-LISTING CLARIFICATION 9444 1990(03) 04/05 190
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9444 1905(05) 05/14/05
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9444 1900(12) 09/19/00
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EOUIPMEHT. AND OFF-GAS SCRUEEER SOLUTION FROM A TANX SYSTEM 9442 1993 (01) 09/20/93
DRAGO)?? PROM P007 - SPEW? CYANIDE PLATING BAt ?) SDLUTIONS 9444 1904(14) 07/30/04
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN FOE6 LISTING 9444 1907(23) 06/30/8?
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 9442 1907)03) 07/20/07
EMFTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 198S 141) 12/12/05
EPA’S ASSESSMENT OF WNETHER AN UNUSED CHEMICAL AND THE RESULTING SPENT MATERIAL ARE IIAEARDOUS WASTE AND/OR MIXED WASTE 9442 1996)01) 03/25/96
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1980)33) 07/27/08
EXEMPTION POE COMMERCIAL FERTILIIEES ONCE TNE PRETILIZER IS PRODUCED 9493 1986403) 00/21/06
F SOLVENT WASTES 9444 1985403) 04 101 105
P006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE EINC PHOSPHATING WASTEWATRR TREATHENT SLUDGES 1987(27) 07/06/87
P006 LISTING FOR PICKLING MID ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES 9444 1987(55) 17/20/0?
P019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 9444 1907 (22) 06/24/87
P021 LISTING FOR SUBSTANCES CONTAINING CNLOROPHRNOLIC rpotwos 9444 1907(42) 09/23/07
FLOATING PLASTIC RALLS USED TO CONTROL VAPORS FROM TANKS CONTAINING LISTED PRODUCT 9444 1906(25) 11/03/06
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9441 1994(00) 03/30/94
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR P006 WASTE 9441 1906(70) 10/12/86
LABORATORIES. RCE.A REGULATION IMPACT 9441 1990(32) 11/28/90
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 9494 1905(01) 10/01/85
MANUFACTURING WASTE CONTAINING COMMEEC3AL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS IN 261 33 9444 1981(01) 03/12/81
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS 9444 1907(40) 09/09/07
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1986(431 05/30/86
MERCURY TESR14OMETERS, RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND EROKEN 9441 1986(27) 04/02/86
METAL F1NISHING SLUDGES 9444 1988(01) 01/11/08
MICRO-CLEAR REGULATORY STATUE 9444 1990(021 03/22/91
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES 9444 1986(02) 01/20/80
MIRTURE OF P003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS 9441 1907)65) 08/17/87
OPF-SPRC COMMERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCTS AT BOTTLING FACILITY 9441 3989)49) 09/28/89
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL 9441 1986(19) 03/08/06
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FURLS, RECYCLING OF UNUSED 9441 1900(39) 07/31/09
P AND U-LISTED WASTES 9444 1989(07) 08/21/89
PAINTS CONTAINING SOLVEMTS 9444 1980(11) OS/OS/SO
PERCHLOROETNYLE1OE AND SURFACTANT, DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING 9441 1985(101 04/10/05
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER 9441 1905 1421 12/13/fl
PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA PROM AIR STRIPPING TOWER TREATING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER 9441 19891171 04/14/69
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FURL O1L/NATER MIXTURSE 9441 1906(21) 03/19/06
RECYCLING OP ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (P0061 FOR CEMENT/AOOREGATR MANUFACTURE 9441 1989(19) 04/26/09
REGULATORY STATUS OP NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA 9442 1994(06) 07/29/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOYERY 9441 199S (04) 02/06/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOILS CONTAMINATED FROM RELEASES OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9441 1992(34) 10/15/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF UNORPLOYED AUTOMOTIVE A1RBAG INPLATORS 9441 1992)00) 04/23/92
SOIL CONTANINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OP PESTICIDE APPLICATIOH 9444 1906)20) 09/29/86
SOLVENT AND COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE flEARS 9444 1909)03) 06/20/89
EOLVENT-CGHTAJ4INATED WASTESTREANS PROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUPACIURER 9441 1980 )49) 12/06/88
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS 9444 1906 (27) 12/05/86
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT GB COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 1906(92) 12/05/86

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No ES
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES
STATUS OF CYCLOPNOSPHAMIDE AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE
STATUS OP UNLISTED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS WHEN RECYCLED
STILL BOTtOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
T i lt STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED EN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW- LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
USED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CPR 261 2
WASHWATERS GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL RURN OP SAND SPIKED WITH TRICHLOEOBENEENE AND NRXACNLORDETHANE
WASTE LISTINGS FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICA l. PRODUCTS - MERCURY
WASTES CONTAINING FOOl-FOIS CONSTITUENTS
WASTES COVERED UNDER TilE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED 1006 LISTING
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIIING OF ALUMINUM
WASTEMATER TREATMRNP SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
Definition
‘AIR EMISSIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERA’VIOES
•NITROOLYCEEINE PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CNENICAL PRODUCTS
CHEMICAL CONVERSION OF ALUMINUM AND WNETNER WASTEWATEE TREATMENT SLUDGE GENERATED IS CONSIDERED AN F019 HAZARDOUS WASTE
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS, VEHICLEE , VESSELS. PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITS. OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERIETIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
9444 1908 (01) 02/11/RE
9444 1992(021 08/24192
9444 1993(01 ) 02/23/93
9432 198E(01) 02/Il/RE
9441.199S(31) 09114/9S
9441 1987(52) 06/26/87
9441.1990(28) 10/18/90
9441 1986(44) 05/30/86
9441 1988(04) 01/14/BE
9441 1988145) 11/02/88
9441 19E8(0E) 02/22/SE
9444 1986(23) 10/21/86
9444 1987(25) 07/23/87
9441.1986(29) 04/09/86
9444 1965113) 09/03/85
9444 1989108) 08/21/09
9842 1997 (01) O6/01/9
9444 1993 (05) 09/11/93
9444 1996 (01) 08/30/96
8441 1.995(151 04/20/95
9441 1995(04) 02/06/95
9441 1988 (44) 10/27/88
9442 1997 (03)
9444 1991 (03)
9441 1986(97)
9441 1987)111
9444 1909(061
9441 1989(53)
9443 1992(06)
9441 1907(71)
9444 1991 (06)
9444 1992(04)
9453 1986 (06)
9441 1991(19)
0441 1987(IE)
9444 19E5( lSa)
9444 1988(09)
9443 1986( OS)
9441 1986(57)
9444 1994(051
9444 1994(06)
9444 1997(02)
9444 1984(02)
9489 1991(03)
9444 1989(05)
9441 1986(54)
9444 1986(08)
9444 1994(08)
9551 1901(10)
9442 1989(05)
9444 1996 (01)
9441 1988 (40)
9444 1992)081
06 /01/97
05/01/91
12/0 1 /86
02/01/67
07/01/89
10/01/8 9
12/01/92
08/01/ 87
11/05/91
10/01/ 92
11/01/ES
12/05/91
01/01/87
07/01/85
04/01/88
01/01/06
05/01/86
06/01/94
08/01/94
06/01/97
03/01/84
06 /E 1/91
07/21/69
07/15/86
OS/02/86
09/21/94
06/05 /9 1
07 /05/89
OE/30/96
08/02/89
12/11/92
F-Wastes
‘AIR EMISSIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
‘COMPARATIVE DEFINITIONS OF FOOl AND F002
‘DILUTION OP P003 WASTEE
• P006 SLUDGE PROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
‘P000 LISTING FOR ELECTROPLATING AFTER CYANIDE BATH
F019 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
•EYDROCNLGROFLUOROCARBONS UEED IN DECREASING
flIANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
flIULT1SOURCE LEACEATE (P039) WASTE CODE AR IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION PROM SPILLS
•PERCNLOEOETNYLENE USED IN DRY CLEANING
‘PROHIBITION ON STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
‘RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261 4(a)(9)
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
‘SOLVENT MIETURE RULE, THE
‘SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
‘SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES (F-WASTES(
•SPENT SOLVENTS FROM VARNISH STRIPPING
TECRNICAL GRADE SOLVENT FORMULATIONS AND THE P003 LISTING
‘UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING SODIUM PENTACNLOROPNENATE ARE P027
‘USE AS INGREDIENT NOT WITHIN SOLVENT LISTING
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM CHEMICAL ETCNING
‘WOOD PRESERVING WASTES - ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASKWATERS
ACTIVATED CARSON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS
ACTIVATED CARSON CANISTERE USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION
APPLICABILITY OF P006 HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELECTEOLESS NICKEL PLATING SPENT SOLUTIONS
CERTIF ICATION/NDTI PECATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTEE SUBJECT TO LURE
CHARACTERISTIC NAEARDOUS WASTE OR SOLID WASTE TREATMENT MAY CREATE A L1ETED HAZARDOUS WASTE
CHEMICAL CONVERSION OF ALUMINUM AND WHETHER WASTEWATIR TREATMENT SLUDGE GENERATED 15 CONSIDERED AN POLO HAZARDOUS WASTE
CHLOROFLUOROCARSONS (CPCa) AS REPRIGERANTS • RECYCLING OF SPENT
CLARIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTINGS PERTAINING TO WOOD PRESERVING OPERATIONS

-------
07/06/99 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 87
CLARIFICATION OF THO SECTIONS OF THE I(AZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION IN 40 CPA 262 11 AND WE NOTIFICATION 9452 1996(02) 06/19/96
CLARIFICATION ON WHAT CONSTITUTES DIOXIN RELATED MATERIALS 9444 1992(09) 12/24/92
CLARIFICATION ON MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. F003. FOSS. 0001. WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING AND TREATHENT STANDARDS FOR CFC 9441 1994(26) 09/28/94
CLASSIFICATION OP F003 WASTES 9444 1992(05) 11/04/92
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLVENTS ADDED TO PAINTS OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS AS REGULATED SPENT SOLVENTS BASED ON THE SOLVENTS STUDY 9441 1996(13) 12/24/96
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTEWATEE TREATMENT SLUDGE FRGM THE REVISED ZINC-COEALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL PROCESS 9441 1994(20) 08/02/94
CLEAN SOLVENT FROM RECYCLED SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE - STILL BOTTOMS 9441 1987(26) 04/17/87
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTACS SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT 9488 1987(01) 02/09/87
CYANIDE-SALT CONTAINING WASTES IN METAL NEAT TEEATING OPERATIONS 9444 1984(01) 03/05/84
DETERMINATION WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE 9441 1995(24) 06/30/95
DIOXIN IN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACHLOROPHENOL 9444 1985(02) 03/04/85
DISCARDED WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY 9444 1991(05) 11/26/91
DRAPT SAMPLING NO ANALYSIS PI.AN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY 9433 1990(06) 11/27/90
DRAGOUT FROM F007 - SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS 1984(14) 07/30/84
DRYCLEANING INDUSTRY WASTES 9444 1987(07) 03/06/87
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES NO THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING 9444 1987 (03) 01/27/87
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN P006 LISTING 9444 1987 (23) 06/30/87
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 9442 1987(03) 07/28/87
F003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS 9444 1987(30) 07/21/87
FOOS LISTING FOR PYRIDINE STILL BOTTOMS 1987(53) 12/15/87
F006 NO F019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS 1986(09) 05/02/86
F006 LISTING NO DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING 9444 1987(09) 03/26/87
F006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY 1987(19) OS/22/87
F006 LISTING FOR PICKLING NO ETCHING WASTES NO DELISTING ISSUES 9444 19B7(SS) 12/28/87
F006 WASTES• VHS NO GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOE 9433 1987(09) 06/08/87
F009 LISTING NO THE MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS NO RESINS 1987(31) 07/28/87
P019 LISTING NO THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 1987(22) 06/24/87
P019 LISTING FOE WWT SLUDGES IN ALUMINUM ANODIZING 9445 1985 (03) 05/31 185
F024 REVISED TREATMENT STANDARDS 9554 1990(05) 06/2 /90
F027 LISTING - USED NO UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING 9444 1987(10) 04/09/87
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR P006 WASTE 9441 1986(78) 10/12/86
IDENTIFICATION OF SPENT SOLVENT IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES 9441 1992(44) 12/22/92
INE FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH K086 NO F001-005 WASTES W4 1987(41) 09/15/67
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS UNDER THE RCRA OF CERTAIN METAL-RICH SLUDGES 9441 1996(05) 06/19/96
LABORATORY WASTE GENERATED IN RESEARCH USING TCDD STOCK SOLUTIONS 1986(16) 08/18/86
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS 9551 1987(01) 01/20/87
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES 9554 1991(01) 01/08/91
LDR DETERMINATION OP WASTE STREAM DILUTION 9551 1990(06) 10/14/90
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS 9441 1987(46) 06/17/87
MIXTURE OF F003 NO A SOLID WASTE NO DELISTING REQUIREMENTS 9441 1987(65) 08/17/87
MIXTURES OF LISTED NO CHARACTERISTIC WASTES 9441 1987(68) 08/19/87
ON-SITE RECYCLING OP SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1986(21) 03/13/86
PAINT WASTES NO THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1987(17) 05/20/87
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1986(47) 06/02/86
PEHTACHLOROPNENOL AS A WOOD PRESERVATIVE 9444 1988(15) 08/29/88
PROCESS WASTEWATER FROM METAL DEGREASING OPERATIONS 9553 1988(02) 03/08/88
ER OS NO SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES NO F-WASTES. HANDLING 9441 1989(50) 10/20/89
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MIXING OP HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS NO USED OIL 9441 1992(38) 11/05/92
EEGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS NO THE MIXTURE RULE 9441 1992 (21) 07/16/92
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PHOTORESIST SOLIDS (SKINS) GENERATED IN THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY 9443 1994(04) 07/12/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP AN ION EXCHANGE RESIN WASTE 9441 1997(01) 01/21/97
REGULATGRY STATUS OF WASTE GENERATED BY MCLAUGHLIN GOAMLEY KING (WOK) COMPANY IN MINNESOTA 1992(03) 10/20/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF WOOD STICKERS USED FOR WOOD PRESERVING OPERAT(ONS 9442 1994(04) 04/08/94
REINTERPRETATION NARROWING THE SCOPE OF THE P006 LISTING 9444 1986(21) 10/04/96
REINTERPRETATION OF THE F006 LISTING 1986(19) 09/25/86
RESIDUALS MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH TRACE SOLVENTS 9444 1991 (04) 08/30/91
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1.1.1-TRICHLORDETHANE (TCE( 9551 1987(13) 06/26/87

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page Ne 88
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE 944 1.1987(21) 04/08/87
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAUD DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 1987(18) 05/20/87
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER MID SPILL RESIDUE 9444 1987(U) 04/14/87
SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE 0? 9444 1986(26) 11/07/86
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAR4S PROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 9441 1988(49) 12/06/88
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WA5TE5TREAR45 PROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 9443 1988(11) 12/06/88
SOLVENTS USED AS COOLANTS AND APPL1CASILITV OP SOLVENT LISTINGS 1987(02) 01/27/87
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR CO10IERC1AL CNEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 1986(92) 12/05/86
SPENT CARSON USED TO REMDVE DISSOLVED PENTACHI OROPNENOL (PC?) PROM GROUNDWATER 9444 1996(05) 01/03/86
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESIN 9444 1995(11) 06/19/85
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 1987(13) 05/OS/2?
STILL BOTTOMS FROM LISTED SOLVENT RECLAMATION 1987(05) 02/02/87
TETRACNLOROETNYLENE ONTAIIINATED WITH POLYCNLORINATED BIPNENYLS (PCR 8( 9444 1989(10 ) 09/22/89
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WNICN FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UIIUSSO FORMULATION OP PENTACELOROPHENOL 9444 1986(03 P 02/12/86
USE OP INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES AS FEEDSTOCR FOR A CATALYTIC EXTRACTION PROCESSING (CEP) UNIT 9432 1996(01) 04/12/96
WASTE P 5044 CI8EI43CAL ETCNING USING CYANIDE 9444 1987(16) 05/20/87
WASTE LISTINGS P006 AND K062, SCOPE OP 9444 1986(32) 12/12/86
WASTES CONTAINING F001-F005 CONSTITUENTS 9441 1988(05) 02/22/88
WASTES PROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED PROM P006 1987(14) 05/08/87
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS 9442 1986(071 07/02/86
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING ((ETHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PIAJfl MAtTER 9441 1986(52) 07/02/86
WASTEWATER TREATHENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE XSOI AND P006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE 9444 1984 (10) 07/25/84
NASTSWATRR TREATMENT SLUDGES PROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS 9444 1985(13) 09/03/85
WASTEWATEES EXCLUSION FROM TEE DEFINITION OF Po ll FOR PCP MANUFACTURE 9444 1987(39) 09/02/87
WATER WALL SPRAY BOOTH WASTES AND THE SOLVDIT LISTINGS 1997(06) 02/28/87
WATER/METHANOL MIXTURE WASTESTREMI 9443 1985(07) 09/10/85
ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL 9444 1984(09) 06/13/84
Iron Foundry Waste
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRT 9441 1987(13) 03/04/87
GRAY IRON FOUNDRY WASTE DISPOSAL 9486 1981(01) 06/18/81
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHiN THE iRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY 9444 1987(08) 03/16/87
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A PERROALLOY FACILITY 9441 1986(48) 06/10/86
RECYCLING OP MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS 9441 1986(01) 01106/86
K-Wastes
‘API SEPARATOR SLUDGE. EXCLUSION OF WATER FRACTION FROM KOS 1 LISTING 9441 1984(13) 05/01/84
‘APPLICABILITY OP Eon WASTE CODE TO PIPELINE TERMINALS 9444 1997(01) OS/S1/97
•8AONOUSE DUET GENERATED FROM REMELTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL 1984(16) 08/01/84
‘K052 BOtTOMS FROM TANK STORING LEADED GASOLINE AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES 9442 1994 (02) 02/01/94
‘KOG l WASTE 9444 1989(02 W 03/01/89
‘MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION 9441 1985(35) 10/01/85
‘MINING WASTE, R064, AND 3004 Cx) 9S71 1986(S4) 07/01/86
‘PRODUCT WASNWATERS FROM DINITEOTOLUENE - Kill LISTING 9441 1988120) 05/01/86
ARE TANK BOTTOMS REMOVED PROM TANKS CONTAINING ONLY NAPNTI(A DREMED TO BR ( (052 hAZARDOUS WASTE? 9442 1995(04) 05/25/95
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF 1(045 9441 1987(12) 03/03/87
CLARIFICATION ABOUT TIlE SCOPE OP EPA’S ADMINISTRATIVE STAY FOR A PORTION OF TEE KI69 NAEARDOUS WASTE LISTING 1994 (07) 09/19/94
CLARIFICATION ON TEE SCOPE OP ROBS 9441 1989 (47) 08/25/89
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TRSATMENT UNITS 9476 1991(011 05/02/91
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1987(98) 12/24/87
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1987(75) 09/04/87
COMMERCIAL FERTILIEERS CONTAINING K061 WASTES 9493 1986(05) 09/11/86
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION FOR 1(062 1987(31e) 07/30/87
DEFINITION OF RCR.A WASTE KDSO 1994(04) 06/03/94
DELISTING PETIT1ONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-EASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMEIFTS 33 1987(21) 09/28/87
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATHENT (DE l ’) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCTANATE (101) TREATABILITY GROUP 99S4 1994(06) 10/24/94
DETERMINATION WNETNER SOLIDIFICATION OF AN EVAPORATOR CONCENTRATE WASTE STREAM ACHIEVES THE WE TEEAI7IENT TSCNNOLOOY STANDARDS 9554 1997 (02) 02/11/97

-------
07/06/90 KEYWOED INDEX Page No 09
DISTILLATION BOTtOM TARS AS K022 WASTE 9444 1909(04) 07/13/ag
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL) 9441 1909(40) 09/12/a g
EXEMPTION FOR LIKE STASILIZED PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE GENERATED ST THE IRON & STEEL INDETRY 9441 1996 (09) 10/01/96
P006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE ZINC PNOSPHATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES 9444 1907(27) 07/06/07
GENERATION AND TREATMENT OF ( (044 WASTE 9551 1900(12) 11/04/00
NAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7025, FEBEUARY 9, 1995) OF K156 WASTE PEON THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE 9441 1995(34) 11/27/95
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS 50TH KOB6 AND P001-005 WASTES 9444 1907(41) 09/15/07
K-WASTE FILTER CAKE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT 9441 1990(35) 12/21/90
KOOl-LISTED WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES 9445 1905(05) 01/10/05
K006 WASTES AND ON-SITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES 9444 1907(37) 00/19/07
K035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1907(27) 12/11/07
KOS1 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION 9494 1905(02) 07/30/05
K052 LISTING FOR WASTES GENERATED BY PETROLSUM INDUSTRY 9444 1901(03) 06/06/01
KOS 1 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOE STEEL FOUNDRIES 9444 1900(06) 12/02/00
K061, EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC FURNACES 9444 1903(02) 07/11/03
K062 - SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR LISTING 9444 1904 (11) 07/27/04
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY 9444 1907(00) 03/16/07
K103/K104 WASTE STEEAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BDAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA 9433 1907(06) 04/02/07
LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTREATED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1990(04) 10/03/90
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELISTING OF 9404 1906(05) 05/23/86
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION 9441 1907(74) 09/02/07
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION 9433 1907(10) 00/07/07
NEW JERSEY ZINC COMPANY K061 STORAGE PILE 9401 1900(01) 01/25/00
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1990(13) 11/00/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA 9551 1990(08) 10/24/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL 9551 1990(09) 11/06/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA 9551 1990(11) 11/07/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK 9551 1990(12) 11/00/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE 9551 1990(10) 11/07/90
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY WW SYSTEMS-K049 WASTE 9441 1904(35) 12/07/84
PETROLEUM REFINERY NW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES 9441 1905(29) 08/23/85
PICKLE LIQUOR AND SCOPE OF K062 LISTING 9444 1985(17) 10/03/85
PROPOSED BEST DEMONSTRATSD AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) FOR K061 WASTE 9441 1900 (06) 03/09/88
RECYCLING OF ELEC’I’RIC ARC FURNACE DUST 9441 1908(27) 06/15/88
REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCEA ON THE STATUS OF ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE 9444 1994(09) 12/19/94
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS. VENICLES. VESSELS, PEOCEES OR MANUFACTURING UNITS, OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SMUT DOWN 9441 1995(15) 04/20/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF CENTRIFUGE UNDERFLOW WASTES 9444 1993(02) 04/20/93
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS ‘(‘HAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES 9496 1991(01) 08/05/91
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K040-K052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES 9494 1991(02) 03/29/91
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION 9433 1991 (02) 04/26/91
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OF THE K062 LISTING, CORRECTION NOTICE 9444 1986(31) 12/11/86
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS 9441 1907(39) 05/20/07
STAINLESS STREL PRODUCTION RESIDUES 9441 1908(07) 03/10/88
SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1907(83) 10/23/87
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062) 9444 1987(47) 10/23/87
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS HOLDING ONLY K-WASTES GENERATED UNDER A TEMPORARY EXCLUSION 9433 1907(23) 10/05/87
THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF CERTAIN VITRIFICATION PROCESSES FOR SPENT ALUMINUM POTLINER (K088) 9441 1997(07) 07/30/97
THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODECNLORINATION PROCESS BY-PRODUCT K-WASTES 9444 1987 (44) 10/16/87
USE OF INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES AS FEEDSTOCK FOR A CATALYTIC EXTRACTION PROCESSING (CEP) UNIT 9432 1996(01) 04/12/96
USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (K047) FROM WHICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WNICN IS USED AS A FUEL 9441 1907(42) 06/09/87
WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS 9442 1907(02) 07/24/87
WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE KOOl AND F006 WAETEWATRR TREATMENT SLUDGE 9444 1904(10) 07/25/84
WAETEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENGL 9444 1904(04) 04/26/84
WNETHER SLUDGE FROM LIME TREATMENT OF A MIXTURE OF K062 AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE QUALIFIES FOR THE LSWPLS EXCLUSION 9441 1996(12) 12/23/96
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(28) 04/07/06
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF 9441 1986(10) 02/11/86
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS 1988(02a) 01/26/80

-------
REWORD UNDER
Page No 90
D O t-Specificat ion
VEFZNIT1GN OP COMMERCIAL CNSI4ICAL PRODUCT FOE SOLED WASTE DETERMINATZON VS NASAROOUS (fADER IDENTIFICATION
flIETHYL CNI.CROPOEI4
•IOAIURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY
SURNING OF USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OP 0 55 CALIBER
CLARIFICATION ON NOW REUSE OP ‘WASTE RESINS’ AS PEED STOCK TO I4ANUPACTUBE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER RCS/I
REGULATORY STATUS OP NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BIJEJIED FOR ENSRGY RECOVERY
WR STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION tRi m PLATBE USED IN THE PRODUCTION OP LEAD-ACID AUTW63TIYE BATtERIES
P-Wa stes
‘EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYBIEOR IS NOT P042
ISONEES OP F- AND u-LISTED WASTES
‘NITROGLYCERIN PATCHES SlOT LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTB WHEN DISCARDED UNUSED
•NITROGLYCSRIO4E PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
‘OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAPORMALOBEYDE MEETS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
CARSON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WHICH PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF TEE DEBRIS STANDARDS TO PO lE WASTES
DSLISTIND PETITION OP NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATS
DETEBMU&T IDU ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OP US IND INCINERATION FOR TWO P076 WASTE STREAMS
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPIND 1 EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION PROM A TARE SYSTEM
RPA’ S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES
P AND U-LISTED WASTES
P-WASTE LISTING FOB CATALYST
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OP THE STATUS OP CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES
REQUIRSMflTCS FOR DISPOSAL OP DISC14ARDRD 11-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT OR SO INALLY CONTAINED A 5001 WI CYANIDE PESTICIDE
SPENT CARBON REGULATION
TRIPLE-RINSING REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO CO1PrA1NERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE IIAEAEDOUS WASTES
Toluene
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
‘SOLVENT MIXTUBE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OP TOLJEDE/BENZENB MIXTURE - CEECLA INTERFACE
9441 1996(07) 08101106
9444 1984117 ) 0B/01/6
9443 1987 (231 10/01/87
9499.1949(02) 10/17/89
9443 1994(061 11103/94
944). 1994119) 0 7l1 I/9
9442 1994 4OS 00115194
9441 1995(14 ) 02106/91
9441 1995(11) 09/14/95
9444 1994(10) 12/01194
9444 1995102) E9/OIISS
9445 1995(01 ) 04/01/95
9444 1993(05) 09101/93
9442 1994 (03) 03/01/94
9444 1907(15) 05/18/ST
9554 1994(011 01104/94
9433 1990(071 (2/21/90
8554 1994(09) 07/26(94
9442 1993(01) 09/20/53
9444 1995(01 ) 02/17/95
9444 1989(07 ) 08/21/99
9444 1981(02) 06/19/el
9441 1997(06) 07(24(97
9442 1993(0S) 32/23/93
9441 1987(371 05/16/87
9431 1991(01) 07(26/93
9444 1994( 10)
9445 3995(02)
9444 3997(02)
9441. 1995(28)
9444 1988(10)
9444 1980(12)
9444 19611021
9444 1909(02)
9444 1981(05)
9441 1997(04)
9442 1993(05)
t2/0I/94
04/0 1/95
06(01/97
98/24/95
99/03/Be
05/19/0 8
16/19/81
0 3/14/69
09/18/8 1
07(24/97
12/23 /9 3
01/01/89
03/28/66
12(19/84
12/02/80
03/16/0 7
01(27/66
09/la/BE
01/24/86
9441 1987418) 03/01/87
0443 1955(111 11/01/85
Bole Active Ingredient
•EPINEPNRINB RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT 9042
‘NITROGLYCERIN PATCHBS NOT LISTED NAZASDOUS WASTE NEEN DISCARDED UNUSED
‘USE AS INDRED1ENT NOT WITHIN SOLVENT LISTING
CAREAI6ATE LISTENG DETERMINATION (69 PR 7824, FEBRUARY 9. 19951 AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS HASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CELOBDANE AND NEPTACNLOR PESTICIDE WASTE
DISCARDED CO(O4SSCIAL CHEMICAL PE0DIICTS
P-WASTE LISTING POE CATALYST
PESTICIDE STANDARDS FOR POSMALOENTDE AND PAR ORMALOENYDE
PESTICIDES CONTAIN1NG A 26 13 (e) COMPOUND AS A SOLE ACT1VE INGREDIENT
RBEILATORY DETERMINATION OP TEE STATUS OP CERTAIN MAJIUPACTURIND WASTES
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OP DISCHAEGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTA1NED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE
Steel Foundries
E061 WASTE
DELISTIRIG PETITION-STEEL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE P1,900
DELISTIED TESTING REQUIREMENTS. CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES • STEEL INDUSTEY
EGGS NAIARDOIIS WASTE LZST1NG FOR STEEL FQIJNORIES
R062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN TES IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECrR IC ARC FURNACES
SLUDGE WASTE NANOLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / P1IIIJRE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS. INFORMATION REQUIRED
9444 1989(02W
9433 1986(07 )
9433 1984106)
9444 5980(06)
9444 1987(08)
9444 1986(023
9433 1986(17)
9441 1986(08 )

-------
07/05/9 8
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 91
“USE AS INGREDIENT NOT WITHIN SOLVENT LISTING
FILTER CARE WASTE CONTAINING SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT
PAINT SPRAY BOOT)) AIR FILTERS
RESIDUE FROM STREAM-STRIPPING OF PROCESS WASTE CONTAINING TOLUENE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITh TOLUENE
STILL BOTtOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
SUBSTITUTION OF EXTRACTION SOLVENTS FOR METNYLENE CNLORIDE
TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF THE FOOS LISTING
TOLUENE-LADEN FILTER RESIDUE GENERATED FROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS
WASTE INR AND SOLVENT MIXTURES GENERATED FROM PRINTING FACILITIES
U-Waetee
“ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
‘METNYL CNLOROFORM
“OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAFORMALDENYDE MEETS COMMERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
ACRYLONITEILE ASN
CAREAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (SO FR 7824. FEBRUARY 9. 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CLARIFICATION OF THE “MIXTURE RULE. • THE “CONTAINED-IN” POLICY. LDR ISSUES. AND “POINT OF GENERATION” FOR UO9S
CONTAINERS USED TO NOW LISTED CNRMOTNERAPY DRUGS
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREAI74ENT WET) FOR 8 OF TEE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DI ISOCYANATE TDI) TEEATARILITY GROUP
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCTS
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING. EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION FROM A TANK SYSTEM
EPA S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED NAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
P AND U-LISTED WASTES
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE STATUS OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL EUEN OF SAND SPIKED WITH TRICNLOROBENZENE AND NEXACNLOROETHANE
Waatewater Treement Sludge
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS UNDER THE RCRA OF CERTAIN METAL-RICH SLUDGES
Waetewater Treatment Sludge
“EXCLUSION OF LABORATORY WASTES FROM THE MIXTURE RULE
“F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
“MIXTURE EXCLUSION
•PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PNOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
METAL FINISHING SLUDGES
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER-CONTAINING WASTEWATER TEEATHENT SLUDGES WNEN RECYCLED
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS/LAND TREATMENT UNITS REGULATION IF ASSOCIATED WWT SLUDGES ARE LISTED
WASTEWATER TEEAI7IENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
LOCATION
(See Siting)
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
(See Interim Statue PrOceee) (See eleo Permit Proceee)
LOW LEVEL WASTE
(See Mixed Waete)
9444 1997(02) OS/01/97
9444 1987(43) 10/09/87
9442.1990(01) 05/03/90
9441 1984(10) 05/15/84
9445 1985(01) 04/05/85
9444 1987(38) 09/01/87
9432 1988(01) 02/11/88
9441 1988(25) 06(09/88
9444 1987(36) 08(17/81
9444 1985(09) 06/03/85
9443 1984(08) 11/23/84
9444 1995(02) 09/01/95
9444 1984(17) 08/01/84
9442 1994 (03) 03/01/94
9444 1985(12) OS/30/85
9441 1999(28) 08/24/95
9551 1996(01) 02/27/96
9441 1987(45) 06/16/87
9554 1994(06) 10/24/94
9444 1985 (05) 05/14/85
9442 1993 (01) 09/20/93
9444 1995(01) 02/17/95
9444 1988(02) 01/20/88
9441 1987(68) 08/19/87
9444 1989 (07) 08/21/89
9441 1997(06) 07/24/97
9441 1988(04) 01/14/88
9441 1996)05) 06/19/96
9441 1996(06)
9441 1987(11)
9441 1990(34)
9444 1991(01)
9433 1991(01)
9444 1988(01)
9444 1990(05)
9441 1993(06)
9480 1985(02)
9444 1989(08)
XREF
XREF
05/01/96
02 /0 1/87
11/01/ 90
02/01/91
03/07/91
01/11/88
10/17/90
04/29/93
0 7/ 17/85
08 /2 1/89
/ /
/ /
XREF / /

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 92
(See Generators) (See also Tranaportara, COT, Haste Minimization)
MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
(see Hazardous Waste Identi [ icstjon)
MARKETER
(See also Hazardous Waste Identificat lon)
•RSGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA
ABILITY OF A HAIARDOUS WASTE BURNING ElF TO SPIKE METALS AND USE OF TEST DATA IN LIEU OF A TRIAL BURN
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COI4BUSTORS
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMBUSTION OF WASTES AS INCINERATION
RCRA POLICY STATEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS’ DILUTION PROHIBITION AND COMBUSTION OF INORGANIC METAL-BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTES
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FuTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACI LITY
MINERAL PROCESSING
(See also Mining Waste)
•DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE
MINERAL PROCESSING FACILITIES. REPORT TO CONGRESS
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS
IEee Tank System)
MINIMUM TECNNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS (MTR)
(See also Compatibility, HSHA. Land Disposal FacilitIes, Relesas, Surface Iiapoundnent. T5DFs)
MACI’ STANDARDS
(See MaIuisuuua Achievable Control Technology (MACTI Standarda)
MAJOR HANDLERS
MAJOR HANDLERS OF NW - DEFINITION
MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
(See Used Oil)
MANIFEST
(See Used Oil)
MAXIMUM ACHI EVARLS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACI’) STANDARDS
(See Incineration)
MERCURY
(See Nalardous Waste Identification)
METALS
EREF / /
XREF / I
9522 1983)02) 07/31/83
EREF / /
ERRP / /
ER0F / /
EREF / /
XREF / /
KREF / /
EREF /
9410.1994(10) 10/01/94
9490 1996(03) 04/01/96
9490 1994 (09) 00 1 17/94
9441 1905(09) 02/04/85
9551 01-01 05/23/94
9433 1906(17) 09/30/06
EREF / /
9441 19SS(12) 03/01/95
9475 1109(02) 02/09/89
9441 1906(01) 11/03/06
EREF / /
EREF / /

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 93
•EXISTING UNITS AND MINIMUM TECNNOLOGY STANDARDS
• WE REQUIREMENTS DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACI LITIES • N .7 LAW
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND NAZARDOUS WASTE
EXISTING UNITS UNDER NSWA-APPLICASILITY OF I CR TO EXPANSIONS
MINIMUM TECNNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS WAIVER PETITION SECTION 3004(0) (2) (SWELL OIL)
MTR COMPLIANCE DATES FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (TREEMEX ENERGY)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS • TNRRMEX ENERGY/RADIAN
REPLACEMENT UNIT. DEFINED - WASTE CONSOLIDATION FROM SEVERAL IMPOUNDMENTS
REPLACEMENT UNIT, DEFINITION, FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF WOOD PRESERVING WASTES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING REQUIREMENTS
TC RULE NAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
VERTICAL EXPANSION AT U S ECOLOGY’S TRENCN 10, BEATFY, NEVADA FACILITY
Linere
EXISTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS WITH LINERS
•LEAE NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
•LINER DESIGN CRITERIA
•LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. AND WASTE PILES
•RETROFITTINO FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
•WASTE PILE LINERS - MTR (264 251)
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
DESIGN AND OPERATING STANDARDS
NSWA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS
LINER DESIGN COMMENTS (DIM, EMELLE,AL)
SOLIDTEK LANDFILL/LINER DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OF NAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAN (PAT) COMMENTS
SUM)4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
VARIANCE FROM 264 LANDFILL LINER & LEACNATE COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
9487 1986(14) 12/01/86
9551 1990(16) 12/01/90
9487 1986)04) 03/26/86
9480 00-14 03/13/87
9432 1985(04) 08/30/85
9522 1988(03) 04/28/88
9484 1987(11) 08/07/El
9521 1987(01) 08/07/87
9484 1987(01) 03/11/81
9484 1986(01) 03/26/86
9594 1990(15) 09/26/90
9484 1987(02) 04/15/87
9441 1991(12) 07/31/91
9487 00-9 02/10/88
0S/01/88
12/04/8 6
03/30/87
10/15/88
10/29/87
07 /01/92
07 /0 1/96
08/07/86
04/ 3 0/87
10/18/85
03/30/87
03/14/86
10/15/88
10/29/87
9522 1984 (02) 05/01/84
9484 1985(02) 08/01/85
9487 1985(04e) 08/01/85
9484 1992(01) 07/01/92
9484 1987109) 07/01/87
9485 1985(01) 03/01/85
9528 1986(01) 03/03/86
9487 1984(03) 09/10/84
9480 1985(01) 04/01/85
9487 1984(01) 02/07/84
9487 1985(08) 10/18/85
9483 1989(02) 01/09/89
9523 00-14 03/14/86
9523 00-12 03/30/87
9523 00-15 03/30/88
9487 1984(02) 03/14/84
9528 1988(05)
9484 1996(01)
9484 1987(09)
9476 1986(04)
9481 1987(07)
10 /0 1/88
06/01/96
07/01/87
10/01/86
07/24/87
Double Liner
•RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
STANDARDS AGAINST WHICN 3004(o) (2) EQUIVALENCY PETITION SHOULD BE COMPARED - DOUBLE LINER
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c) (2) OF RCRA
Leachete Collection/Detection SyeteR
•LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFI LLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
•RNGULATION OF LEACNATE COLLECTION SUMPS
LINER/LEACNATE COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
SECONDARY LEACNATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEMS - PML TOP LINERS
SOLIDTEE LANDFILL/LINER DESIGN
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT( COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFIT1’IND AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c) (2) OF RCRA
9528 1988 (03)
9487 1986(11)
9523 00-12
9484 00-Se
9480 1987 (02)
9484 1992(01)
9487 1996(01)
9487 1986(10)
9484 1987(03)
9487 198S(08)
9523 00-12
9S23 00-14
9484 00-Se
9480 1987(02)
Retrofit
CHANGEE DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORRECTION
DELAY OF CLOSURE FOR NON- RETROFITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTINUING TO RECEIVE NON- HAZARDOUS WASTE
•RRTROFITTING FOR PERMITTED EURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
•RETROFITTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR NSWA PROVISIONS

-------
07/06/ 98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page NO 94
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A REFINERY DITCH SYSTEM
DECISION DEADLINES FOR RETROFIrrING WAIVER REQUESTS
Kl0]/R104 WASTE STREAMS - RELAT iONSHIP OF CWA RAT, LAND DISPOSAL RRSTR1CTIONS. BOAT . AND DELISTIHG CRITERIA
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETROFITTING VARIANCES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFVrT INC AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
MINING WASTE
(See also Exclusions)
‘EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EICLUE1DN
‘MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
‘MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION
‘MINING WASTE, E064, AND 3004 (x)
‘ORE AND MINERAL EXTRACTION, BENEFICIATION MID PROCESSING EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
‘POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATHENT OP MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
APPROPRIATENESS OF THE EP/TCLP SIMULATION OF CO-DISPOSAL SITUATION FOR MINING WASTES
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES
DECISION DEADLINES FOR RETROFIT’I’ING WAIVER REQUESTS
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAXARGOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA EEG)
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMEUSTIGN OF WASTES AS INCINERATION
MINERAl, PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FURL
MINING LABORATORY WASTES UNDER 40 CFR 261 4(b) (7) - EXCLUSION OF
MINING WASTE AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C
SECONDARY MATERIALS RECYCLED IN PNDSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS
Bevill Amendment
‘DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BSVILL EXEMPT WASTE
NEW WASTES NOT COVERED BY BEVILL EXCLUSION
APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTID LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS
EERYL PLANT AND RAFPINATE DISCARD CLASSIFICATION
BRVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
CHLORIDS- IIMENITE PROCESS WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED RY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLARI FICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TRRATHENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
INTERPRETATION OF THE BSVILL EXEMPT STATUS OF WASTES AT THE MACCORP FACILITY
IRON AND STEEL SLAGS, REGULATORY STATUS
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION IHCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
MINING WASTES FROM SRARLES LAKE OPERATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED FROM GOLD/MERCURY AMALGAN RETORTING
SCOPE OF EEVILL AMENDMENT AS IT APPLIES TO PHOSPHATE MINING, PHOSPHORIC ACID PRODUCTION. AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES
SHAM INCINSRATIOH AND TREATHENT OF R040 -XOS2 WASTES IN CEMENT XILHS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
THE REGULATORY STATUS OF IRON AND STEEL 5LAZ5 AND GYPSUM
TREATHENT STANDARDS AND THE BEVILLE SXCLUS ION
Boiler Slag
‘MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
94)2 1994(02) 05/12/94
9571 19B7(I1) 10/ag/SI
9433 19B7(0S) 04/02/SI
9484 1906(04) 04/21/S6
9404 00-Sa 10/15/SB
XREF / /
9441 1984(11) 04/01/04
9441 19B4 (2)) 07/01/S4
9441 1985(35) 10/al/ES
9571 19S6(04) 07/01/86
9571 i9S9(01) 01/al/ag
P441 1905(09) 07/01/05
9571 1955(01) 10/03/es
9441 19S5(09) 10/03/as
9571 19B7(l1) lo/OB/BI
9441 1989(11) 02/07/39
9494 1907(02) 04/19/87
9441 1905(05) 02/04/85
9441 19B4(19) 0B/1S/04
9441 1954(09) 0S/09/84
9441 1986(72) 09/16/ES
9441 19B6(55) 07(16186
9571 1991(15) 06/27/90
9441 1995 (12) 03/01/93
9571 1909(02) 10/01/89
9441 1994(11) 05/11/94
9571.1990(01) 03/15/90
9441 1907(76) 09/ iS/S I
9441 1991(05 ) 04/22/91
9441 1993(161 09/SS/93
9490 1994(13) 12/05/94
9441 1994(05) 03/23/94
9571 1990(04) 05/30/90
9441 1986(40) 06/10/86
9441 1986(S1I 11/01/85
9441 1993(12 1 06/30/93
9441 1993(041 04/26/9)
9441 1992(10) 05/15/92
9491 1991(02) 03/29/81
9442 19S7(B2) 05/13/97
9554 1990(10) 00/23/90
9441 1934(21) 07/01/84
Coal
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
COAL ASH AS A SOLID WASTE
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION AENI
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT
RETORTED OIL SHALE AND COAL FLY ASH
STATUS OF MIXED COAL PRODUCTS
9441 1907(76) 09/15/47
9511 1990(02) 04/09/90
9441 1986(11) 04/21/86
9441 1986(49) 06/16/OS
9571 1990(03) 04/06/90
9441 1996(031 05/30/96

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 95
Energy Exploration Waste
• EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL. NATURAL GAS • OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EXCLUSION
“REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
• REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE FROM OIL GATHERING PIPELINES
CLAEIFICAT1ON OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE OIL FIELD ECRA EXEMPTION
CLARIFICATION REGARDING ‘1 7 1K SCOPE OF THE EXEMPTION FOR LARGE VOLUMES OF WASTES GENERATED AT EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION FACIL ITIES
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE FLUIDS ASSOCIATED WITH CLEAN UP OF CRUDE OIL LEAKS IN ACTIVE OIL FIELDS
DRILLING OPERATIONS, EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM
Fossil Fuels
“FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
‘MINING EXCLUSION FOE SMELTER SLAG
‘STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
STETUS OF MIXED COAL PRODUCTS
Large Volume Waste
SEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILiTY
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS
(See Subpart El
MIXED RAD1OACTIVE WASTES
(See Mixed West )
MIXED RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES
(See Mixed Waste)
MIXED WASTE
“MIXED WASTE AND LAND BAN
ASPHALT MATERIALS DISPOSAL
EPA’S ASSESSMENT OP WHETHER AN UNUSED CHEMICAL AND THE RESULTING SPENT MATERIAL ARE HAZARDOUS WASTE AND/OR MIXED WASTE
IS THE CHEMICAL POTASSIUM NEXACYANOCOSALT (Ill-FERRATE (II), USED AT A DOS NUCLEAR PLANT, CONSIDERED A “MIXED WASTE” UNDER ECRA’
MIXED WASTE REGULATION
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
PEECNLOROE’DIYLENE AND SURFACTANT. DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING
USED OIL EURNED FOR ENERGY EECOVERY, INTERPRETATION OF SUEPART E
WASTES FROM STORAGE OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Atomic Energy Act (AKA)
“LAND DISPOSAL EESTEICTION NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DECNARACTEEIZED MIXED WASTE SENT TO AN ATOMIC ENERGY ACT LANDFILL
APPLICABILITY OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO WIPP-DESTINED TEANSURANIC MIXED WASTE
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE. AEA AND DOE INTERFACE
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL, DEFINITION OF
E IGE-LEVEL, TRANSURANIC. AND LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION DF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
By- Product
BRASS DROSS SXIMMINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES, BY -PRODUCT
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK 5G TDMS
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL, DEFINITION OF
9441 1904111) 04/11/04
9571 1993101) 17/11/93
9441 1992103) 01/01/92
9571 1993102) l1/OS/93
9441 1909)27) 06/06/09
9441 19001485) 11/21/00
9441 1991(055) 05/21/91
9443 1980 (03) 09/04/00
9441 19061161 02/01/86
9441 1984(23) 07/01/04
9441 1995(16) 04/01/95
9441 1996 (031 05/30/96
9441 1987(76) 09/15/87
XREF
XREF
XREF
/ /
/ /
/ /
XEEF / /
9551 1909)02) 03/01/09
9443 1900(03) 03/22/00
9442 1996(01) 03/25/96
9441 3995 (30) 09/13/95
9441 1907 (1021 07/30/07
9441 1907(60) 00/19/07
9441 1905 (10) 04/10/05
9495 1909(01) 05/15/09
9444 1900)03) 11/17/00
9S51 1997 (Dl) 01/01/97
9409 1996)01) 02/00/96
9441 1986 (46) 06/02/06
9432 1986(10) 04/12/06
9441 1907(41) 06/01/07
9541 1906(14) 07/03/06
9441 1905(21 ) 06/06/05
9441 1906(37) 05/01/06
9432 1906(10) 04/12/06

-------
o7/o6/9e
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 96
NRC
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OP COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS
SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL
STATS AUTHORI EATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
9441 1992(12)
9431 1988102)
9594 1997(05)
9994 1994 (03)
9482 2994 (01)
9461. 1985(01.)
9441 1986(461
9490 00-14
9502 1906(09)
9954 1995 (02)
9442 1987(41)
9529 1999(13)
9541 1986(14)
9555 00-01
9441 1992(07)
9441 1986(94)
9503 1985 (01)
9554 1989(04)
9441 1992)15)
9432 1986(14)
9541 1984(08)
9442 1993(04)
9441.1986 122)
9543 1996(19)
9529 1997(14)
9443.1987(04)
9525 1986 (04)
9551 1988(071
9541 1987)04)
9541 1986(20)
9541 00-6
9441 1991 (02)
9525 1990 (02)
9554 1990)14)
05/01/92
01/01/99
I4/01/ 97
02/16/94
09/02 194
09/19/ES
06/02 1 86
03/13/87
05/08/86
09 /19195
06/01/07
10/15(99
07/03/86
09/28(90
03/31 /92
12/19/86
05 /10 18 9
06 /13/88
06/03/92
09/06/06
09/13/84
11/22 193
03/19/86
10/14/06
21/12/87
03/11/97
00/11/86
06 /13/08
06 /2 9/07
10/20/06
07 /3 0/87
02/1 2/91
10/17/90
12 /27/90
9480 00-14 03/11/87
9451 1989(02) 06/26/99
9443 1987)04) 03/11/07
9941 1907 (04) 06/29/87
9441 1988(113 04/21/88
9441 1989(01) 02/07/09
9441 1989(15) 04/05/99
9441 1989(14) 04/02/89
9432.1986(14) 09/06/89
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTtOMS PROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBENZENE
DROSS PROM ALUMINUM SMRLTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OP CEMENT
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, 0Y-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RES IDUES AS BY- PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS
ON-SITE INCINERATION OP A WASTE THAT IS ROT)) A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
Mixed Radioactive Waetes
‘LEAD USED AS SHIELDING IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
‘MIXED RADIOACTIVE AID HAZARDOUS WA5TS, DISPOSAL OF
•TREATEENT STANDARDS FOR D008 RADIOACTIVE LEAD TANKS AND CONTAINERS
ACCEPTABILITY UNDER THE RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS OP TWO METNODS OP MACROENCAPSULATION FOR MIXED WASTES AT ROCXY FLATS
APPLICABILITY OP A PROPOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION TO CERTAIN DOE RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
RULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES NOTE DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, AEA AND DOE INTERFACE
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OP COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U S ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
EPA’S DETERMINATION ON WHETHER MACROENCAPSULATION PROCEES ADDRESSES THE REQUIREMENTS OP 40 CFR EECTIOI4 258 45, TABLE 2
NIGH-LEVEL, TRANSURANIC, AND LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE, CLARIFICAT ION
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OP MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCiNERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS EFFECT ON STORAGE/DISPOSAL OP COMMERCIAL MIXED WASTE
MANAGEMENT OP MIXED WASTE
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
MIXED WASTE (DOE FACILITIES), DEFINITION OF
MIXED WASTE DISPOSAL PROM RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST INTERSTATE COMPACT
ON-SITE INCINERATION OP A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND NAIARDOIJS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE EXEMPTION IN NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OP SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
REGULATION OP HASARDOUS COMPONENTS OP RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
REGULATION OP RADIOACTIVE MIIED WASTE AT DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY FACILITIES
SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL
SCINTILLATION VIALS CONTAINING DOOl WASTES. MANAGEMENT OP
SMALL-VOLUNE MIXED WASTE LARDRATDRY GENERATED MATERIALS AND LEAD
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OP RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE HAZARDOUS COMPONENTE OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY 1(2 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE
TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES AT HAIARDOUS WASTE PERMITTED TSDP
TREATMENT STANDARDS IDE CERTAIN MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES
Mixed Radzoact lve/Radtoactive Wanes
CLAREFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF COI04ERCIALLY AVAILABLE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY & DISPOSAL CAPACITY VIS-A-VIE ECU SECTION 30041 ])
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITH RADIOACTIVE PROPERTIES
JOINT NRC- EPA GUIDANCE ON AN APPROACH FOR COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
LIQUID SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL SOLUTION PRODUCT, READY SAFE
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS
ON-SITE INCINERATION OP A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
9442 1996 (02) 07/09/96
9441 1985)263 07/05/95
9497 00-8 08/03/87
9443 1988)02) 01/11/88
9451 1989)02) 06/26/99
9432 1986)14) 09/06/06
9441 1997152) 06/26/87

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page NO E l
MIXTURE RULE
(See alec Derived-Prom-Sulci XREF / /
‘DILUTION OP P003 WASTES 9441 1986(97 ) 12/01/06
‘EXCLUSION OF LAEORATORY WASTES FROM THE MIXTURE RULE 9441 1996 (06) 05/01,94
‘GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS 9453 1989(01) 04/01/89
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE I D 9441 1988(14) 04/01/88
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE LiSTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS 9441 1986(74) 09/01/86
‘MIXTURE EXCLUSION 9441 1990(34) 11/01/90
‘MIXTURE RULE - DISCHARGES TO WASTEWATER 9522 1987(02) 12/01/07
‘MIX’IURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE 1993 (02) 02/01/93
‘SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FOR DEGREASING OPERATIONS 9441 1987(19) 03/01/07
‘SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FROM DEGREASING OPERATIONS 9443 1981(08) 04/01/87
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE 9441 1981(18) 03/01/87
‘SOLVENT M1XTURE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OP TOLUENE/BENZENE MIXTURE - CIRCLA INTERFACE 1985 (11) 11/01/85
l,I,l-TRICHLOROETHANE CONTAINED IN A SAND-METAL-SOLVENT MIXTURE 9443 1989(07) 07/10/89
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASHWATERS 9444 1989(05) 07/21/89
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE 1980(05) 11/18/80
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF E045 9441 1987(12) 03/03/01
SAN ON USE OP LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS 9487 1986(07) 04/37/06
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIPICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1986(9S) 12/23/86
CARSON REGENERATION FACILITY. MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) 9441 1986(33) 04/23/06
CHARACTERIEATZON OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS 9442 1995(01) 01/26/95
CLARIFICATION OP THE ‘MIXTURE RULE,’ THE ‘CONTAINED-IN’ POLICY, LDR ISSUES, AND ‘POINT OP GENERATION’ FOR U096 9551 1996(01) 02/27/96
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC’S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT 9488 1987 (01) 02/09/87
COMPRESSIVE STRENG’I’N OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9 ’ 1987(03e) 11/17/87
DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS OF HALOGERATED HAZARDOUS CONITITUENTS AS CONTAINED IN USED OIL 9592 1996(01) 02/08/96
DELIST1NG ACTION - STATUS OF NOLLOMAN AIR FORCE EASE 3987 ( 16) 01/31/67
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACRATE LEVELS 1986(01) 01/07/06
DEPLETED MIXTURES OF ETHYLENE GLYCOL AND WATER FROM NEAT EXCHANGERS 9441 1989(42) 08/04/09
EFFECTS OP THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 9451 1986(01) 03/17/06
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS EDT IN P007-009 LISTINGS 9444 1908(07) 04/07/SE
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTANIRATfl3 WITH RCRA-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1909(30) 06/19/89
EXCLUSION PROM REGULATION POE CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986(03) 01/07/86
F SOLVENT WASTES 9444 1985(03) 04/01/05
GENERATION AND TREATHENT OP E044 WASTE 9551 1980(12) 11/04/80
HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTIC - BASIS FOR LiSTING 9441 1984(32) 11/07/04
HAEARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR F006 WASTE 9441 1986178 ) 10/12/06
INTERPRETATION OF THE’MIX’flJRR RULE EXE)4PTIGIR AS IT RELATES TO SCRUSRER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OP CERTAIN SOLVENTS 9441 1994(16) 06/10/94
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFE, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS. HAZARDOUS WASTE PROM MIX’IURE o 9441 1984(37) 11/14/04
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LIETED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO 9441 1986(07) 01/23/06
MANAGEMENT OP WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTIDN IHTO SEWER 9441 1386(73 ) 09/25/86
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS 9441 1907(46) 06/17/07
MIXING OP METHANOl, AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE 9471 1983(01) 07/12/83
MIXING RULE DEFINITION 9441 1981(06) 06/09/el
MIXTURE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE . ASH FROM INCINERATIGN 9441 1985(32) 10/07/85
MIXTURE OF P003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTIWG REQUIREMENTS 9441.1987 (65) 08/17/07
MIXTURE OF METHANOL AND SOLID WASTE WHICH DOES NOT EXHIEIT ANY CHARACTERISTICS 9441 1906(23) 03/21/86
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT 9441 198U28) 04/30/87
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT 9441 1987(20) 04/30/07
MIXTURES OP SOL1D AND HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1987 (06) 01/27/07
MIXTURES OP SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC 9441 1985(30) 11/20/es
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1907(17) 05/20/87
PESTIC1DE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER 9441 1905(42) 12/13/85
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSEWATEE 9443 1906 (05) 07/12/05
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-PROM RULES 9441 1985(29) 08/23/85
PROPER DISPOSAL OP SILVER NITRATE AND CHLOROFORM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS 9441 1993101) 02/23/93

-------
07/0 6/9 6 REYWORD INDEX Page NO. 99
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1990(04) 11/17/80
REFINERY WASTEWATSR 9444 1980(02) 11 113180
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MIXING OF MEARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL 9441 1992(38) 11/05192
REGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPERY SOLVENT LISTINGS AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9441 1992(21 ) 07/16/92
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OP WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL 9441 1992(361 10/26/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF AESOROENT MATERIAL WHEN MIXED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION 9441 1992(291 09/04/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP LABORATORY WASTEWATRR 9441 1992 (01) 01/15/92
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATHENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9433.1966(11 ) 04/24/85
SECONDARY MATERIALS RECYCLED IN PHOSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULAT iNG SYET9C 9571 1990(05) 06/27/90
SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS 9444.1996(06) 03/31/86
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS 9444 1996(26 1 12/OS/66
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE (NALCAST 6015/WATER/HA l) 9444 1905(151 06/24/65
STATUS OF MIXED COAL PRODUCTS 9441 1996(031 05/30/96
TREATMENT OF HAEARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATHERT PLANT 9441 *986(62) 06/19/66
USE OF WASTE LEATHER TRIMMINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF AESOREED MATERIALS 9441 1996(041 06/11/95
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAEAR000IS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED 9441 3984(30) 10/22/64
WAENWATERE GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS 1986(44) 05/30/86
WASTE GENERATED BY 231 INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OP SAND SPIKED WITH TRICHLORORENEENE AND NEXACHLGROETHANE 9441 1986(04) 01/14/00
WASTES CONTAINING FOOL-PODS CONSTITUENTS 9441 1909)05) 02/22/89
WASTEWATER TREATMENT EYSTER. SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN 9441 1985 (43) 12 117/85
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITE
(See also Permit Process. Permit Conditions) RREP / /
tNDBILS WASTEWATER TREATHENT UNITS 9432 1987(05) 06/01/67
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 9441 1966(30) 04/16/06
MOEILR SOLVENT RECYCLER GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR 9432 3966313) 06/08/66
PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR HANDLING MOBILE TRRAWRNT UNITE 9525 1962(01) 01 129102
MODELS
KEEP / I
SUESURFACE PATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL 9431 1991(01) 03/26/91
MODIFICATIONS
(See Permit Prolesa under Permit Modification) XREF / /
MONITORING
(See Groundwater Ilonitoring) XREF / I
MORE STRINGENT/OROADER IN SCOPE
(See State Authorization) XREF / /
MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
(See also Solid Heats) XREF / /
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL. REGULATION OP 9441 *963(00) lO/21ld3
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABEOREENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS 9551 1993 (04) 11/37/93
SUITABILITY OF DISPOSING OF FROZEN STRAWBERRIES THAT MA V ER CONTAMINATED WITH HEPATITIS A VIRUS IN A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL 9551 1997(05) 09/12/97
Sanitary LandIill
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDPILL. REGULATION OP 0411 1963(06) 10/Il/SI
WONNAEARDOUS LIOUID WASTEWATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND HSWA, DISPOSAL OF 9574 1985(01) 01/22/69
SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS & LEACNATE PROM SANITARY LPe THAT RECEIVED HAZARDOUS WASTE 196) (01) 06/10/63

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 99
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION
15cc also Incinerat Ion)
‘REGULATION OP MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
EXEMPTION FOR MUNICIPAL WASTR COMBUSTION ASK FROM HAZAEDOUS WASTE REGULATION
IMPACT OF DRAPT HAZARDOUS WASTE MiNIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO’S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ARE AND SLUDGE
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION, DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASH
MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATOR ASE MANAGEMENT
RESIDUES FROM IS S NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
REVISED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR CITY OF CHICAGO V EDF MUNICIPAL, WASTE COMBUSTION (PINCh ASH SUPREME COURT DECISION
MUNITIONS
(See Nazardous Waste Identificat Ion)
NATIONAL VARIANCE
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
NATURAL GAS
EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY WASTE EXCLUSION
‘PRODUCED WATERS FROM NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION - EXCLUSION
‘REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
CLARIFICATION OP CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
NEW UNIT
(See Construction)
NO-MIGRATION VARIANCE
(Sea Land Disposal Rsstrtctionsl
NONCOMPLIANCE
lEss Data)
NONKAZARDOUS LIQUIDS
(Sea Liquid Waste)
NOTIFICATION
(See also Eurning and slsnding EPA I D Number, Land Disposal Restrictions) lEss Universal Wastes)
‘LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE- LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
‘TANK REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REOUIREMENTS
DECISION NOT TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION FROM GENERATORS WHO BURN SPEC IFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE
IIREF / /
9573 1991(01) 05/01/91
9571 00-01 09118/92
9573 1994(01) 01/10/94
9S73 1990(02) 03/19/90
9443 3986( 13) 05/17/06
9443 1907106) 04/00/07
9573 1986(01) 06/17/OS
9441 1987(16) 03/17/87
9441 1995)11) 03/12/95
XREF / /
REEF
/ /
XREP / /
9441 1984(11) 04/01/04
9441 1904(21) 07/01/04
9571 1993(01) 07/01193
9571 1993 (02) 11/05/93
9444 1993 (03) 09/09/93
9442 1994(05) 04/15/94
XREF / /
XREF
EREF
XREF
/ 1
/ /
I I
EREP I /
9404 1985(02) 00/01/OS
9441 1980)13) 04/01/00
9477 1900 (03) 07/01/90
9494 1906)05) 04/11/OS
9495 1986(09) 04/21/06
9495 1987(05) 03/26/97

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 100
INTERIM STATUS QUALIPICAT ION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES, APPLIED 9520 1986110) 11/13/86
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF 9494.1986(01) 02/09/06
NOTIFICATION REQUOREMEITI’S FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES 9441 1992 (30) 09/09/92
PROPOSED PERM1T-BY-RUI.E FOR USED OIL RECYCLERS 9495.1906 (30) 11/24/06
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES 9451.1989 101) 05/03/09
NPDES FACILITIES
(See Clean Water Act, Meatewater) XRSF / /
NRC
(See Mixed Weete ) EREF I /
OS/CD
(See Subpart 11 under Open Burning/Open Detonation) XREF / /
OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS
(See Interim Status Procees) XREF I
OFF-SITS FACILITIES
RASP / /
‘ACCEPTANCE OF WASTE IN A PERMITTED FACILITY 9472 1903(02) 07/01/83
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS R hO THE OFF-SITE DEFINITION 9452 1909(02) 09101/09
‘MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 9452 1990(01) 02/01/90
EPA 1.0 NUMBER AND FACILITY I.OCATION 9461 1909(03) 00/10/09
OFF-SPECIFICATION
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) XRSF / /
OILY WASTE
(See also Hazardoue Waate Ident IficatiON) XREF / /
‘PETROLSUM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATHEI1T SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION 9444 1991101) 02/01/91
CLABIF1CATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN EPA’S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL 944) 3995( 17) 05/03/95
CLARIFICATION AS TO W)IETNER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGERS EPA’S USED OIL PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS 9592 1995101) 001)0/95
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OilIER WASTES. STEEL INDUSTRY 9433 1904 06) 12110/04
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS 9441 1986)03) 01/07/06
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION 94)2 1906 (05) 02/05/06
METHODS 1310 AND 1330 EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE 9443 1907)14) 00/11/07
RETORTED OIL SHALE AND COAL FLY ASK 9S71 1990 (03) 04/06/90
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING NSMA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS 9433 1906(23) 12/30/66
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS 9442 1991(14) 10/29/91
OMNIBUS PROVISION
XREF / /
‘CORRECI’LVE ACTION A(ITHORITIES 9S02, 1995(02) 02/01/95
‘1718 OMNIBUS PROVISION AND PERMITS 9520 1906(01) 02/01/06
APPLICABILITY OF OMNIBUS AUTI(ORI’I’Y AND SITE SPECIFIC RISR ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COIBUSTION STRATEGY 9490 1996)05) 05/10/96
APPLICABILITY OF THE OMNIBUS AUTMORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RISE ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9490 1996(01) 02/26/96
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LA2IDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION 3906(0)) 03/03/06
ECOLOTEC PERMIT REMAND ORDER AND USE OP THE OMNIBUS FROVISION 9524 1909(02) 03/02/09

-------
0 ,/ 0 6 / 98
ESYWORD INDEX
Page No 101
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES
ON-SITS WASTE MANAGEMENT
(See 6150 Permit Process, Generators)
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR S-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITS LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TREATMENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES
INTERPRETATION OF GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITS AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS
(1006 WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING ThESE WASTES
OiL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY (IN SYSTEMS-X049 WASTE
ON-SITE INC1NSRATION OF A WASTE TNAT IS BOTN A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND NAZARDOUS
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262 34
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUID1ZSD BED INCINERATION
STATUS OF MIXED COAL PRGDUCTS
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO)
TREATMENT OF NAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR • S ACCUMULATION TANKS
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION lOB/GD)
(See Subpart K, Federal PacilitleR)
OPERATING LIFE
(See Permit Conditions)
9498 1994 (04) 07/05/94
9S01 1987 (03) 12/28/87
XRSF I I
9433 1987 (21) 09/28/87
9413 1957)22) 10/02/B ’
9451 1996(06) 05/01/96
9432 1957(09) OB/19/87
9441 1954(35) 12/07/84
9432 1986(14) 09/06/86
9451 1987(03) 07/OUR ’
9522 1985(05) 12/13/85
9441 1996(03) 05/30/96
9441 1957(30) 04/30/87
9453 1987(02) 03/25/87
XREF
XREF
/ /
//
(See Listed Nstardoue l inte l
PAINT FILTER TEST
(See also SN-846)
‘LIQUIDS AND PREE LIQUIDS. DEFINITION OP
XREF
9S26 1907(16)
9453 1904(03)
9441 1907(71)
9471 1984(04)
9494 1906(05)
9452 1986(01)
9502 00-2
9502 1906(09)
9487 1906(10)
9432 1954 (01)
9472 1907 (01)
9432 198 ,112)
9521 1955(05)
9S22 1984(031
F /
11/01/B?
12/01/84
08/01/87
08/01/84
04/1 1/RB
01/21/86
04/10/86
05/08/86
08/07/86
01/27/84
06/24/87
10/28/57
12/11/85
07/ 35 184
OSNA
(See also Wealth and Safety)
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATNWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CNEMICALS
OWNER/OPERATOR
(See also Permsr. Application)
•CNANGES IN INTERIM STATUE - SELLING PART OF A FACILITY
‘GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES FACILITY OWNER/OPERATOR OR MOBILE RSCYCLING UNIT OPERATOR
‘MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
‘OWNER AND OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES DURING OPERATING LIFE AND CLOSURE
ADMINISTRATIVE COWTROL AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PSRIIfl’ ISSUES - U 5 ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
LINER/LEACNATR COLLECTION SYSTEM CONPAT1BILITY
OPERATOR AT DOE OAK RIDGE FACILITY, DETERMINATION OF
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-ONNED CONTRACTOR-OPERATED (GOCO) FACILITI ES
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZZD BED INCINERATION
PERMITS ISSUED TO BOTN OWNERS AND OPERATORS IF DIFFERENT PEOPLE
P-WAS T RS
REEF / /
9551 1991(04) 01/30/91
XREF / /
XREF / /
9432 1985(03) 05/01/85

-------
07/06 /98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 102
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS 9487 ,1985(04 ) 08/07/85
SUMMARY OP PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) C o ENI-5 9523.00-14 03/14/86
Free Liquids
‘CALIFORNIA LIST 9554 1987(03) 07/01/87
‘LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS. DEFINITION OF 9432.1985(03) 05/01/85
‘PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE 9443 1983(03) 02 01/83
‘THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROH18ITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS 9467 1995(01) 01(01 /95
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IONITASILITY DEFINED 9443.1985(02) 02/26/85
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS 9487 1986(071 04/27/86
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS 9442.1995 (01) 01/26/95
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-asS )CE’IlIODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9445.1987(03a) 11/17/87
LIQUID WASTE. DEFINITION OF 9432.1981(011 06/28/El
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS 9553 1987(151 12/03/87
PCB-COIITAI4INATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF 9487.1988 (Dl i 02/03/88
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES AND THE DILUTION PROHIBITION 95S1 1987(23 ) 11/13/87
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OF 9445.1984(06 ) 07/30/84
PAINT WASTE
(See Hazardous Waste Identilication) (See also Listed Hazardous Waste, Chsracteriattc Hazardous Waste) KEEP /
PART A PERMIT APPLICATION
(See Permit Application) IEee also Interim Status Process) XREF / /
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION
(Ses Permit Application) (See also Interim Status Process) XREF /
PARTIAL CLOSURE
(See Closure Process) XREF I /
PCBs
REEF / /
•1NTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQO WASTE 9526 1966(05 ) 01/01/ES
•PQ WASTES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1996(06) 09/01/96
ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RESIDUAL CONTAMINANTS IN THE EPA IWC1HXBATOE RESIDUES (REVISION) 9461 1985(93) 04/01/Es
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE 9443 1986(13) 05/23/86
PCB-COWTAI4INATED WASTES. STABILIZATION OP sss l.1P55IOI) 03/03/55
RCRA TEST METHODS & QA ACTIVITIES 9441 1966(311 01/10/66
SORTEC EXTRACTION SYSTUM VS. SOXNLET EXTRACTION SYSTD( FOR PREPARATION DF PCE SAMPLES 9443 1966)08) 05/31/66
TETBACHLOROETNYLENE CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCNILORINATED BIPHENYLS IPCBs) 9444 1989)10) 09/22/59
PEEFOEI4AIICE ETANDABOS
(See Eollers and Industrial Furnaces) REEF / /
PERMIT APPLICATION
XREP / /
‘l IrTERIM STATUS MID SOD 9521 1995(OSa) 05/01/as
‘PART B APPLICATION 9522.1965(02) 03/01/65
‘PERMIT APPLICATION AND RENEWAL 9523.1994(01) 09/01/94
CORRECTIVE ACTION REGUIRENEWTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES 9502 1986(14) 06/22/86

-------
07/06/BE KEYWORD INDEX Page No 103
EPA AUtHORITY TO IDEA PERMIT APPLICANT MI5TORY Op COMPLIANCE MI nI ACRA 9523 1991(01) 03/13195
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS. NIGH PRIORITY PERMI17ISC 9501. 1586(0 1 .) 09/ 1.1/a G
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-OWNED CONTR.AC ItR-OpERATED (OOCOI FACILITIES 94731987(01) 06/24/67
PERMIttING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT NAVE LOST INTERIM STATES 9526 1986(11) 12/10/66
Inconiplate Part B ’s
INADEQUATE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION 9521 1964(01) 05/02/64
Owner/Operator
‘GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES. FACILITY OWNER/OPERATOR OR MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT OPERATOR 9453 1984 (03) 12/01/81
‘OWNER AND OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES DURING OPERATING LIFE AND CLOSURE 9471 1964 (04) 06/01/84
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA. DEFINITION OF 9432 1961(12) 10/28/El
PERMITS ISSUED TO BOTH OWNERS AND OPERATORS IF DIFPERRNT PEOPLE 9522 1964(03) 07/30/84
Part A Permit Application
•O(ANGES DIIRI)EI INTERIM STATUE - CORPORATE REORGANIZATION 9528 1985(04) 10/01/65
•EIIISTING PORTION OF A LAND DISPOSAL UNIT, DEFINITION (260 10) 9432 1982 (01) 08/01/62
‘INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WflNDZAWL 9453 1991(0 1 .) 06/01/91
•MIXSD RADIOACTIVE AND NAIARDOUS WASTE, DISPOSAL OP 9431 1968(02) 01/01/88
CARBON REOENERATION UNITE - REGULATORY STATUS 9489 1991 (04) 08/02/91
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS 9528 1987(10) 09/03/67
CLARIFICATION OP DEFINITION OP FACILITY- AND PART A MAPPING REQUIREMENTS 9522 1993(01) 10/07/93
LAND OWNER SIGNATURE ON PART A 9523 1983403) 06/17/83
PEEMITI’INO UN1TS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE 9476 198S(03) 09/11/85
REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED hASTE AT DEPARTEENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES 9S28 1987(14 ) 18/12/87
Part B PersiSt Application
•CONTRMrS OF PART B PERMIT APPLICATION TRAFFIC REQU1RDIENTS 9523 1966(01) 11/El/Re
‘EXPOSURE INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS 9523 1967(03) 11/01/87
‘PARt B PERMIT APPLICATION CNECELISTS 9523 1964(04) 05/01/84
‘ECU PERM1TE FOR MOBILE TRRATMNTI’ UNITS 9523 1986(01) 03/01/ES
SUMFS IN TEE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION 9502 1985(05) 08/01/eS
‘TOPO MAP REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES 9523 1984(11) 03/01/84
‘TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION DEADLINES 9501 1950(01) 07/01/90
CALL-IN OF STORAGE AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS 9528 1988(04) 04/59/dR
CLARIFICATION ON T I lE AMOUNT. TYPE, AND FREQUENCY OF TRAINiNG REQUIRED FOR PERSONNEL RANI3LING HAZARDOUS WASTE AT FACILITIES 94S) 1993102) 10/07/93
COMPLYING WITH ECU INTERIM STATUE STANDARDS WHILE DEVELOPING A PERMIT APPLICATION 9528 1986(09) 30/2 7/66
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION 9526 2986(01) 03/01/85
FILING PART B PERMIT APPLICATION 9523 1983(06) 09/10/03
0)04 DATA IN PART B APPLICATIONS 9523 1984(07) 09/10/64
I)04EDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW CORRECTIVE ACTION REQU1REMENTS 9502 1985(01) 02/ 16/ eS
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNWIENTS a CI.EAII CLOSED WASTE PILES. CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87 9522 1988(05) 11/10/86
52.140 TREATMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS - REPINERY WASTE ANALYSES GUIDANCe 9523 19S4 102) 04/01/64
MISCELLANEOUS UNITE SUBPART E IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 9469 00-2 04/22/87
PART E PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOE SQO TREATMENT FACILITIES 9521 1965(06) 12/26/85
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, TNERMEX ENERGY/RADIAN 9521 1967101) 06/07/67
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT PART B REQUIEW4ENT5 9523 50- lA 11/16/RE
PROVISIONS IN PART B APPLICATIONS PRIOR TO EFFECTIVE DATE AND FINAL RULE 9S23 1985(02) 03/30/85
ECU CORRECT iVE ACTION PROGRAM 9431 1991(03) 05/17/El
REOULATORT INTERPRETATION OF LOSE OP INTERIM STATES PROVISIONS AS IT APPLIES TO 08100 FACILITIES 9526 1992 (01) 10/15/92
REQUIRED SIGNATURES ON FART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS 3523 6985(01) 02/25/85
S0I04AES OP ASSISTANCE SPAI1CE( PERMITtiNG C 0WIFFS 952) lI-IS 03/14/89
SWII4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) CO16(EIEI’S 9523 00-14 03/14/66
SIRIMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COnSENTS 9523 00-12 03/30/61
Pta-Construction Ban
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOE NEW FACILITIES 9481 1586(10) 10/01/se

-------
07/0 6 /99 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 104
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES 9481 1986104) 07 101/es
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRiCTIONS 9502 1986 (11) 06116/16
SITE PREPARATION WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OP PERMIT 9528.1992(02) 10 121/92
Signatures
LAND OWNER SIGNATURE ON PART A 9523.19 13 103) 06/17/63
REQUIRED SIGNATURES ON PART B PERI4IT APPLICATIONS SS23 1985 (011 02/25/es
SIGNATORIES FOR DEPARTMENT OP DEPENEE PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9522 1965(01 ) 02/11/65
W ithdrawals
REPORTING WITHDRAWALS IN SPIeS AS FIlIAL PERMIT DETERMINATIONS 9521 1984 (03) 07109/64
PERMIT CONDITIONS
(See also Corrective Action, Storage. TSDPe) REEF / /
•PERI4IT CONDITIONS, INTERPRETING REGULATORY AUTHORITY 9514 19931011 12101/63
•PERSONNRL TRAINING DURING POST-CLOSURE 9523 1985(05) tO/ a t/ OS
CO11OCO PART B PERMITS 9553.1990(011 05/11/90
ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND EPA ISSUED PERMITS 9527 1990(01) 01/26/50
PERMIT CONDITIONSt THE VELSICOL DECISION 9524 1984 (02) 10/11/84
STAYING NSWA PERMIT CONDITIONS 9521 1989(03) 12/09/88
Expansions
INTERIM STATUS OF PROPOSED LANDFILL CELLS 9487 1961(01 1 03/ 12/ Il
PART R INFORMATION REGARDING F 7IIJRE POTENTIAL EXPANSIONS 9523 1984 (08) 09/10/14
Operating Life
PACILITYS OPERATING LIPS. DSTSRMINAT1ON OF 9477 1984 (07) 12/03/84
Permit Requirements
CONTENTS OF PART S PERMIT APPLICATION TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS 9523 1988)01) 11/01/88
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS 9451 1996)02) 05/01/96
‘INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQO WASTE 9528 1886106) 07/01/86
‘LAND TREATMENT 9486.1987(01) 07/01/87
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR NSWA PROVISIONS 9481 1987(07) 07/24/87
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GRO(IWDWATER. REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OP 9401 1985(01) 10/IS/eS
APPLICABILITY OF 4OCFN 270 lIt) (3) TO IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RELATING 10 REMOVAL. TRANSPORTATION, AND/OR TREATMENT OP BOMBS 9522 1991(02) 04/26/93
APPLICABILITY OP OMNIBUS AUTHORITY AND SITS SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS 10 WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STPATZGY 94S8 1996(05) 05110/96
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT 9431 1994(02) 11/15/94
APPLICABILITY OP THE OMNIBUS AUTNORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996(01) 02/26/96
CLARIFICATION OF OEFXNITION OF FACILIT’r MIII PART A MAPPING REQUIREMENTS 9S23 1993(01) 10/07/93
CLAE1FICATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICARLE TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILIT1ES UNDER RCRA 9417 1994(05) 08/19 /94
COMPACTING HAZARDOUS WASTE INSIDE STEEL DRUMS AS TREATMENT 9503.1991(01) 05/21/91
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE. REQUIREMENTS 9482 1988(01) 01/21/86
CORRECTIVE ACT1ON AT FEDERAL FACILITIES. NATIONAL PRIORITIES 9502 1906(04) 02/13/86
OELP.Y OP CLOSURE RULE PREAI4RLE LANGUAGE. CORRECTION 9476 1989(021 08/22/S
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS 9527 1988)03) 08/11/88
GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME REQUIREMENTS 9453 1989(05) 04/21/69
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE TANKS • PERMITTING 9483 1984(01) 02/23/88
INTERPRETATION OP ORNERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1996(06) 05/01/96
INTERPRETATION OF THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OP 40 CFR 270 30(1) (10) SS24 1994(01) 07/39/94
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SEED WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM 94 1989(01) 03/20/89
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTIONS 9522 1988(04) 11/02/88
PERMITS FOB PLACEMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES 9412 1906(04) 06/04/86
PERM ITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND D1SPOSAL RESTS ICTIONS 9502 1986(11) 06/16/06
PERMITTING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOIL WNICN IS HAZARDOUS OR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551.1996(04) 11/27/96
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT PART S REQUIREMENTS 5523.50-IA 11/18/eS

-------
07/06/90
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Pea 105
REEF
9502 1986(10)
9521 3986 I02)
9521 1906 lOGs)
9522 1906 (029)
9484 1907(09)
9525 1906 (05)
9441 1906(58 )
9502 1985)09)
9481 1586(061
9521 1906(03]
9432 1986(10)
9442 1986 103)
9402 1985(011
9441 19861061
9502 00-2
9502 1986(14 )
5523 00-It
9488 00-IA
9502 1986(17)
9451 1986 (01)
982) 1991(01)
9471 1986 (01)
9503 2981(01)
9449 1987(13 )
9481 1987(02)
9502 1985(06 )
/-
05/0 1/8 6
04/01/86
0 8/01/86
10/01/86
0 7/0 1/87
10/01/86
06 /01/86
12/16/85
08/06/86
04/08/86
04/ 12/86
04 /02/86
11/26 /8 5
11/20/86
04/18/86
08/22 /8 6
12/10/ 88
05/01/88
09/29/86
03/17/ 86
02/13 /8 1
01/03 /8 6
07/06/87
03/04/8 7
03/10/87
10/29/ 85
9502 00-4 09/21/86
9451 1989 (01 ) 05/01/89
9441 1991(17) 11/04/91
9521 1594(01) 10/17/94
9499 1994(12) 11/08/54
9524 1988(01) 02/23/88
9461 1994 (01) 06/21/54
9502 1987(11) 12/21/87
9525 1985 (01) 10/01/85
9475 1985(02) 10/01/85
9520 1986(01 ) 02/01/86
5529 1986(011 12/01/86
9503 1993(01) 11/02/93
9489 1996(02) 06/10/96
9489 1993(05) 02/22/91
9551 1996(04) 1 1/27/96
9521 1994(011 11/17/94
IREF / /
IRE? / /
RCRA FACILITY ASSE$SMENTS IMPLEMENTATION
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
REGULATION OF FURL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATHEI(T AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
REGULATORY INTSRPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 210 10(1 1(101
USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE NORMAI, COURSE OP TRAN5PORTATIOW
VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION
Permit Standards
‘PERMIT MODIFICATION
‘500 100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERAT0RS AND THE MANIFEST
‘THE OMNIBUS PROVISION AND PERMITS
‘TREATHENT CAPACITY
ELIGIBILITY OF IN-SITU VITRIFICATION TECHNOLOGY TO RESEARCN. DEVELOPMENT. AND DEMONSTRATION PEEMIITING
NOW TREATING FILTRATION MEDIA COMPARaBLE TO ACTIVATED CARBON WOULD RE PERMITTED UNDER RCRA
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR 02 flORAL I N SALT DOMES
PERMITTING AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOIL WHICH IS HAZARDOUS Oil CONTAINS ICAZAI(DOUS WASTE
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREAI3cENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
PERMIT DENIAL
IEee Penilt Process)
PERMIT MODIFICATION
(See Peni lE ProCNReI
PERMIT PROCESS
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACIL1TY BOUNDARY - FINANCiAL RESPONSI81LITY REQUIREMENT
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION IN PERMITS
‘POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
‘RETROFITTING F R PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
‘TERMlNATION OP PERM ITS
‘TREATABI LITY STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES • PERMIT REQUI REMEIITS
3008( 9) OF TER SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT. INTERPRETATION OF
ACLa UNDER 12)3 RCRA Alto CERCIA PROGRAMS. USE OF
AWARD OF PERMITS FOR ((8W HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL FACIUTIES. PROCESS
BYPRODUCT MATER1AL, DEFINITION OF
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CONTAINERS POE SAFE AND ECONUMICAL STORAGE. TRANSPORT. AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. DEVELOPMENT OF
CONTAMINATED GROUND MATER AND VOLATILES PROM AIR STRIPPING, TREA T HENT OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECT1VE ACTION REQUIRENENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
DENIAL OP RCRA OPERATING PERMITS
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OP CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
0ODS IRP PROORAM AND ACER CORRECT) VS ACTION
EFFECTS OF TOE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS OENERATOA WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
EPA AUT)IOR1IT TO CONSIDER PERMIT APPLICANT NISTORY OF COMPLIANCE WIll) RCRA
FACILITY TRANSPER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
FEDERAL PACILITIRS INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOU)IIRY
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STAIlDARD5/ACL 1 N CRAP? NEWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANTI
NSWA APPLIED TO FEDERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAR RIDGE)

-------
07/06 /98 KEYWORD Page No. 106
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN DIOXIN WASTES. MODIFICATION CF 1995104) 05/30/85
INSTALI4TION RESTORATION PROGRAM (1RP) - DOD 5502.I.986 120( 12/08/96
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE. CLARIFICATION 9528 1989(33) 30/15/69
LAND DISPOSAL U I IIT CLOSURE CIJRIPICATION OP PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES 9476 1985(05) 11/13/85
NEGOTIATED PERMITS 9505 1997401) 01/13 111
0041505 AUTHORITY TO CONTROL EMISSIONS OF METALS, HCL & PICa FROM INCINERATORS 9524 1999(01 1 02/27/89
PRRFORNANCE MD PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004W), PRONIRITION OF PI.ACEMEJJT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOUR 9185 19851011 09120/IS
PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR CEE T RIJC’TIO II OF NERVE 9498 1936110) 09/11186
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCS4Ej Ir ISSUES (REG x i 9522 00’3 11/13 187
PERMITTING INCINERATORS 9488 00-2 06/10/ES
PERMITTING iSSUES IDUPO(8T EDGEMORE FACILITY) - GUIDANCE 5525 1938(02 1 07/01/88
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOE A PCE INCINERATOR 9491 1966 (041 04/11/36
POET-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (A31MCO STEEL) 9522 1986(03 ) 11/20/86
PUBLIC NEARING ASTER ISSUANCE OF DRAFT PERMIT - STATES 9S21 1934(021 05/97/84
PUBLiC INVOLVEMENT IN PERMITTING• POLICY FOR EXPANDING 9521 1916104) 04/30/96
RDID PERMITS - POLICY GUIDANCE 9503 50-IA 12/23/Es
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTUR8S 9441 1986 (22) 03/19/36
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, ECRA APPLICABILITY TO 9902 1983(03 ) 04/02/87
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES 9472 1910101) 06102191
STORAGE PERMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING 9441 1989(11) 03/27/39
SUIGNARY OF ASEISTANCE BRANCH PERMI’ITIND COMPIE1ITS 9523 00-13 03/14/39
SU900ARY OP ASSISTANCE ERANCE PERMITTING COI0OEIITS 9S23 00-17 09/02/88
SU)04ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PATI COpQjENTS 9S23 0011 03/14/86
SIP04AEY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) C0O(INTS 9523 00-15 03/30/88
EURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CI,OEURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3009(i) OP RCRA 9476 1987(01) 06/09/87
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TINE ALlOWED FOR CLOSURE 9484 00-Ba 10/IS/SE
THERMAL RELI1F VENTS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS. ACCEFTASILITY OF 9488 00-3 06/30/86
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS HASTE IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS 9453 19S6(08) 12/22/86
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS. IMPLEMENTA’IION 9502 00-3 08/04/66
Appeals
ECOLOTEC PERMIT REMAND ORDER AND USE OF THE OMNIBUS PROVISiON 9524 1939(02) 03/02/39
POSTPONEMENT OP A LAND TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION FOR NAVAJO REFINING CO • ARTESIA, NM 9524 1999103) 03/23/89
RECONSIDERATION OP DELISTIEG DENIAL EASED ON USE OF VNL TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD, no no. 9433.1986 (08) 03/21/86
Deadlinea
•PARY 9 APFLICATIOW 9523.19851O2J 03/01/85
CALL-IN OP STORAGE AND TREATHENT APPLICATIONS 9529 1938(06) 04/19/88
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUE APPLICABILITY FOR CEMENT EIUIS 9528 1987(12) 09/18/87
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS. NIGH FRIORITY PERMITTING 9901 1986(01) 09/11/86
LA uD DISPOSAL FACILITIES NOT ON A PERS4ITTI1II OR CLOSURE SOIEDULR 9501 1937(011 09/17/83
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTiONS EFFECT ON FEPIcITS 9522 00-1 09/15/87
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 9489.00-2 04/22/87
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PEMMIT DEADLINES FOO l 1987103) 12/28/87
WASTE FILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS, APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1988 DEADLINE TO 9901 191S1011 10/01/ES
Delegation of Authority
ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND EPA ISSUED PERMITS 9522 1990(01) 01/26/90
NEWLY 1DENTIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW TC 9523 1990101) 01/11/90
PERMITTING ISSUES IDUPOIIT EDGEMORE FACILITY) - GUIDANCE 9525 1988(02) 07/01/88
EPLITT1IG FEDERAL RCRA PERMITS WITH THE STATE AUTHORIZATION 9521 1990(01) 05/23/90
STATE PERMITS ISSUED BEFORE RECEIVING ECRA PHASE II AUTHORIZATION 9542 1992403) 06/09/82
Joint PeTIISIL1IIg
GUIDANCE ON ROW TO COORDiNATE PERMIT 3004(U) AND ORDER 3009 IN) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 1999(04) 08/10/89
PIG-82-5 AND RSI 95 JOINT PERMITTING IN FNASE I AUTHORIZED STATES 00-1 10/03/85
RCRA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III 9541 1965(01) 03/06/85

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 107
ECRA PERMITS WITH HSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS 9502 1987106) 06/30/87
WASTE MINIMIZATION PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING 9560 1985(01) 09/ 11 185
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER 9541 1985(05) 05106185
On-Site Waste Management
INTERPRETATION OF GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO VARIOUS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SCENARIOS 9451 1996(06) 05/01/96
ON-SITE INCINERAT1ON OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS 9432 1986(14) 09/06/86
ON-SITE TREATHENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262 34 1487(03) 07/01/87
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATHENT BY PLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION 9522 1985(05) 12/13 185
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO) 9441 1907(30) 04/30/87
TREA17IENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN OENERATORS ACCUMULATION TANKS 9453 1987(02) 03/25/87
Permit Dental
•APPEAL/RECOURSE PROCESS FOR PERMIT DENIAL 9521 1986 (04a) 04/01/06
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS 9523 00-11 12/10/86
Permit ModifiCation
•ADDITION OF A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT TO A ll EXISTING INTERIM STATUS FACILITY 9528 1985)01) 12/01/85
‘CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES 9528 1987109) 08/01/87
‘CONSTRUCTiON DURING INTERIM STATUS WHERE ORIGINAL UNITS ARE CLOSED 9528 1987)03) 03/01/07
‘CONVERSION OF PERMITTED OR INTERIM STATUS UNITS TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS 9525 1996(01) 01/01/96
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PERMITS 9525 1988(01) 02/01/88
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WHILE SEEKING A MAJOR PERMIT MODIFICATION 9502 1986(03) 01/01/86
‘INTERIM STATUS VS PERMIT MODIPICATION FOR NE 1ILT REGULATED UNITS 9525 1989(02) 05/01/89
‘OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS 9524 1906(01) 01/01/86
‘PERMIT MODIFICATION 9525 1905(01) 10/01/85
‘PUBLIC CO)04ENT PERIODS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS 9525 3990(01) 08/01/90
‘STOCK TRANSFER - EFFECT ON PART A PERMIT APPLICATION 9525 1984(01) 08/01/84
‘TERMINATION OF PERMITS 9525 1986(06) 11/01/86
AMEWDED DEFINITION DF SOLID WASTE - PERMIT MODIFICATIONS 9525 1986(02) 03/27/86
CLARIFICATION OP CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICAELE TO PERMITTED NAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES UNDER RCRA 9477 1994(05) 08/19/94
CLARIFICATIDN OP THE TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION PROVISION OF 40 CFR 270 42 (a) 9527 1993(01) 02/09/93
IS A SECTION 3008(h) ENFORCEMENT ORDER AN APPROPRIATE MECNANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU? 9502 1995(01) 02/17/9S
MULTI-SOURCE LEACIIATE AND THEATHENT STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9S54 1990(08) 07/31/90
NEW WASTE STREAMS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9S28 1990(01 1 04/02/90
NEWLY IDE1ITIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW It 9528 1990(03) 07/lI/SO
NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT PERM1TTED FACILITIES 9520 1906(041 01/30/86
PERMIT PROCESS ISSUES 9521 1906(02) 03/24/E6
SCINTILLATION VIALS CONTAINING 0001 WASTES, MANROEMENT OF 9525 1986(04) OE/1I/E6
SOLVENT MIXTURES, FINAL RULE TO LIST - PERMIT MODIFICATIONS 9525 1986(01) 03/24/66
SPLITTING FEDERAL RCRA PERMITS WITH THE STATE AUTHDRIZATION 9521 1990(01) 05/23/90
TREATHENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES AT HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITTED TSDF 9525 1990(02) 10/17/90
Permitting
‘PERMiT APPLICATION AND RENEWAL 9523 3994(01) 09/01/94
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO CNEMICAL FLOCCULATION UNITS WNEN USED TO TREAT WASN WATER FROM AIRCRAFT ENGINES 9451 1996(08) 09/23/96
E10(ANCEI3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND STRONGER COMBUSTION PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS 9505 1994 (01) 05/23/94
RCRA EXPANDED PARTICIPATION RULE 9505 1995(01) 12/20/95
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
(See Permit Conditions) KEEP / /
PERMIT STANDARDS
(See Permit Conditional XREF / /

-------
07 /06/90 REy%ce JEER Page No 100
PERMIT tING
(See Closure Proceas, Permit Process) ESEF / I
PERSONNEL TRAINING
XREP / I
•PERSONNEL TRAINiNG DURING POST-CLOSURE 9523 1995(05) 10/01/85
PESTICIDES
(See Agricultural Waste) (See ales Naeerdoue Waste rdentificatlon) REEF / /
PETITIONS
(See also Exclusions, Deliating, Land Disposal Restrictions) KREP / I
‘APPEALiNG DENIAL OF PETITiON TO DELIST A HAZARDOUS WASTE 9433 1997(04) 02101187,
‘OSLISTING OF S OS ! WASTE A l’ PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS 9433 1986(12) 04/01/86
•DELISTINO PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY 9433.1994(03) 11/01/94
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS 9498 1994(09) 08/17/94
ATEDR HEALTH ASSESSMENTS UNDER RCRA 3019 9523 1986(05) 11/21/86
COMBINATION OF SLUDGES FROM ALL IMPOUNDMRNTS TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSIS 9433 1907(07) 04/13/87
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA ’S MOBILE INCINERATOR 9433 1986 (201 12,11,86
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PNO’IU FIII4 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE 9433 1991(01) 03/07/91
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASH 9 3 3 1991(03) 07/10/9!
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROIIDE RINSATE 9433 1990(07) 12/21/90
DELISTINO PETITIONS. PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING 9433 1957(15) 07/26/57
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TERATHENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES 9433.1907 (22) 10/02/97
DELISTING, INTERIM STATUS. AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U S NAMEPLATE COMPANY 9433 1987(03) 02/25/87
DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION BASED ON EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 9433 1987(05) 03/19/67
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EKCLUSIDN PETITION 9433 1994(05) 12/11/84
EVALUATION OF DELIETING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED 9433 1986(04) 02/14/86
EXTENSION OF APPLICAELE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9551 1966(09) 0 0/Il/ES
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AS A BASIS TO DENY A DELISTING PETITION 1997(08) 04/24/07
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNI$(ENTS S CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87 9522 1908(05) 11/30/08
E103/E104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSN1P OF LEA BAT, LAJID DiSPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, UDAT. AND DELISTING CRITERiA 1997 (06) 04/02/07
METAL, 5061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMEIFF-DELISTING PETITION 9433.1997(16) 08/07/07
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1990(1]) 11/00/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA 9551 1990(08) 10/24/90
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOE ATLANTIC REFINING I MARKETING. PA 9551.1991(061 04/22/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR CONOCO, MT 9SS1 1991(09) 05/29/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ORSON, TX 955 1. 1991(03) 01/29/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REP1NIIC, OS 95S1 1991(05) 02/05/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX 9551 1991(12) 12/10/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EOCN’S REFINING, TX 9SS I.199l(01) 02/03/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL 9551 1990(09) 11/06/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL 95S1 1991(14) OS/0l/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA 9511 1990(11) 11/07/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, GE 9551A990( 12) 11/08/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, GE 9551 1990(10) 11/07(50
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK 9951 1991(03) 01/17/91
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TREACO, WA 9551 1991(08) 05/29/91
PERFOEMAZICE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES 9489 1991 (05) 02/22/91
PETITION TO WITHDRAW R090 AND R091 LISTINGS 9444 1999(11) 10/03/89
REINTERPRETATION NARROWING THE SCOPE OF TNR FOOd LISTING 1986(21) 10/04/86
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - TNICEENER TREATMENT TRAIN AI1D THE MIXTURE RULE 9413,1906(I1) 04/24/96
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELIS’IING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES 94 1906(21) 12/13/06

-------
0 7 1 06/98 KEYWORD INDEX NO i 09
SAMPLING REQUIRD(ENTS FOR ESTIMATING VARIABILITY OP WASTES FOR DELISTING PETITIONS 9433 1986)22) 13 (1 8/56
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELIST1NG PETITION 9433 1991(02) 04/26/91
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELIST I 1IGS .jff j jp, py - ON 9 33 1956C14) 05/27/as
UNIVERSAL WASTE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 9593 1997(02) 02/13/97
NASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES CONTAINiNG METHANOL U 3959(521 10/06/89
PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTES
(See also Esclusloria. DeliatIng) IRE? / /
‘40 CFH SECTION 161 4 (c) EA IARDOUS WASTES WHICH ARE EI9STEO FROM CSRTAIN ESOULATIOWS 9441 1999(138) os/Oi/90
•BURNIHG/ SLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (ZYLENE ) WITH USED OIL 9462 1955 (0)) 12/01/95
WELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM TEE PETROLEUM z,wusmv 9433 1994(03) 11/01/94
X052 BOTTOMS PROM TANK STORING LEADED GASOL INE AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES 9442 1994(02) 02/01/94
‘OFF-SPECIFICATION USED DII. FUEL 9-454 1986 (02) 02/01/66
‘PETROLEUM REP1NERY NASTENATER TREATHENT SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION 9444 1991(01 1 02/01/91
‘RECYCLED USED OIL - TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING. COURT DECISION 1989(02) 11(01/89
‘USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT 9493 1986(06) 12(01165
‘USED OIL , DEFINITION OP 9431 1986(01) 01/01/99
ARE TANR BOTTOMS R VEO PROM TANRS CONTAINING ONLY )4APNTHA DEEMED TO ES K052 HAZARDOUS HASTE? 9442 1995(04) 05/25/95
ATOMIZER MULTI-OIL FUELED HEATERS IESPECTIOH AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR 9495 1969 (02) 09/22/RB
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS. REGULATION OF 9441.1999 114) 03/06/67
SOILERS USED IN OREENWOUSE OPEEATEOMS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 9432 1956 (03) 01 109196
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFP-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1956(95) 02/23/96
DECISION EDT TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION FROM GENERATORS WHO BURN SPECIFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE 1987(05) 03/26/87
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - ND MIGRATION PETITIONS 9551 1988 (15) 01121188
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINEHIES 9486 1959 (0)) 01/02/88
EXPORTING PETROLEUM HASTE TO 5o jn( AMERICA 9455 1989 (011 06127/59
HSHA PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A OUST SUPPRESSANT 9493 00-IA 05/13/86
LAND TREATMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS - REFINERY HASTE ANALYSES GUIDANCE 9523 1991(03) 04/03/84
MIXED HASTE EMIULATIOD - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC RSOUIRD4ENTS 9451 1989(02) 06/25/89
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY 9551 1990(13) 8 1/08/90
ND-MIGRATION PETIT1ON POE EXXON, 9551 1991(03) 01/29/91
HO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KDCH S REFINING. TX 9551 1991(01) OI/03/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM. IL 955) 1990109) 13/06/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON. IL 9951 1991)14) 05/01/91
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SNELL OiL, HA 9551 1990)11) 11/07/90
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING. OK 9551 1991)02) 01/17191
OIL MID GAS EXPLORATION ERCL T EJSIOI) 9441 1987104) 01/13187
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFiNERY NW SYSTDIS-K049 WASTE 9441 1994)35) 12/07/84
PETROLEUM FRCILIT1EI INCLUDED IN ThR RO51 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE 9644 1967(21) 05/26/57
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS 9416 1990)15 ) 10 117 198
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW MIETURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES 9441 1985(29) 08/23(85
PETROLEUM REPINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR 9483 1990(03) 09/20190
REFINERY HASTEHATER 9444 1950(02) 11/13080
REGULATION OP GEL? NAZARDOUS PEIROLEU)4 REFINERY HASTE 9493 1991(01) 01/08/91
REGULATORY STAIUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED ST TEXACO TO SE BUILT IN El. DORADO. KANSAS 9441 1995(18) 05/25/95
SECONDARY SLUDGES PROM SIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS 9441 1985(08) 02/22/85
SHELL OIL FACILITY - It COMPLIANCE 9431 1991(02) 05/09/91
UNDERGROUND INJECTION HELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY 9521 1991(02) 08/30/91
USED OIL SURIED FOR ENERGY RECOYERY INIERPRZ IATION OP SU9PAWT E 1989)01) 05/15/89
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED 9441 1994 (10) 10/72/94
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION 9441 1966(11) 02/11/96
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION igBs(02) 03/19/96
ReCOVered 0(1
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OP CERTAIN PROVISiONS CONTAINED IN EPA S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL 9441 1695(17) 05/03/9S

-------
07/06/98 ERYW hiDES Page No. 110
Used Oil
CLARiFICAT ION AND/OR AECONSIDERAtON OP CERTAIN PROVZSIONS CONTAINED IN EPA ’S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL 9441 1995(1 1) 05(03195
REGULATORY STATUS OP SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SAEEZ PROCESS FOR RECYCL1NC PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES 9432 1993(01) 03/05/93
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN RE MIEED 9 11TH cRi mE OIl. 9592.1994 (04 1 06/09/94
PHOSPHATE WASTES
(See Hazardous Waste Ide!ttificetl on) /
PICKLE LIQUOR
(See Electroplating) REEF / F
P outs
45c c Incineratic) REEF /
POST-CLOSURE
(See elso Closure Process, coat Estimates. Financial Responsibility. Groundwater MDziltOrlflgI l IRE ? / /
•ASIJIJSTMEHT OF POST-CLOSURE TRUST FUNDS USED FOR FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 9477 1988 (09) 11/01/88
•AIINUAL PAYMENTS INTO A STAJIESY TRUST FUND WHEN USING A LETTER OF CREDIT 9477 1996403) 12/01/96
CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATES SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE 9522 1988401) 02/01/es
CORRECTIVS ACTION 1W PERMITS 9521.1986406a) 06101/16
‘FINANCIAL ASSURANCE COST ADJUSTMENTS ON A QUARTEELY BASIS 9477.1994102) 06/01/94
‘C liP V GOP FOR COST ADJUSTIIEPTrS WIDER ECU 9477 1991 (03) 06/01/94
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT WONITORING/COERECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSID INTERIM STATES FACILITIES 9481 1968(021 04/0 1 188
‘GROUNDWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PEEIOD/POS’T-CLOSURE CARE PERIO0 9482 2988 103I 04/03/98
‘INI’EGRITF ASSESSMENT FOR TANKS AND POST-CLOSURE 9483.1989 (044 10/01/89
•POST-CLOSURE PERI4ITS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9522 .1986 102a) 10/01/56
•POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOCATED IN A 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 9484 19944021 12/01/64
3008 ( 1 7) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT ClOSING PACSLITIES, USE OF 1502 (0-7 03108/sq
CLOSURE & POST-CLOSURE REOU1REMRNTS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9476 1983(021 01/11/83
C1,OSURE/POST-C1.OSURE REGULATIONS/PARTIAL CLOSURE (EMELLE.AL) 9476.1986(01) 05/08/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502,1986 (06) 04/15/96
CORRECTIVE ACTIO41 AT FEDERAL PACILITIEE, NATIONAL PRIORITIES 9502 1986(04 ) 02/13/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION REOII1EEMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILiTIES MID IRP ACTIVITIES 3502 1986(14) 08122186
DENIAl. OP RCRA OPERATING PERMITS 3323.00-11 121101 16
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCT iON OP NERVE AGENTS, NIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING 9501 1966)01) 09 (1 1146
INSTALLATION RESTOEATIQN PROGRAM (IRfl - DOD 3502.1966)20) 12108(46
INTERPRETATION OF tCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO TI lE REMSDIA’IION OF CO4ITAMI1IATION 9502 1969(03) 06(15(49
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOP. FACILITY CLOSURE 9476 1915(03) 09 1 11/85
POST-CI.OSURE PERMIT PART B REQUIREMENTS 9521 50-lA 11/18/85
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL) 9522.1946403 1 11/20(86
POST-CLOSURE PERMITT iNG REQUIREMENTS FOE NON-REGULATED UNITS 9476 1965(041 09(25/85
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ROE NON-REGULATED UNITS 9921 1965(011 09(25/85
RCRA POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR REGULATED UNITS AT NFL SITES 9476 1992(01) 07(02/92
RCSA PEOCRAI4 DIRSCTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY S iGNIFICANT FACILITIES 9501 1987(02) 12/14/87
EEOULATDRT XNTS SPSETATION OP ORIRC’IION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES. INC 9476 2190(011 06/04/90
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9902 1987(051 04(02/87
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, AFPLICARILITY OP 3005(11 OF RCRA TO 9476 1987(011 06/09/87
(See Naetewater l REEF / /

-------
07/06 /98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No ill
PRE-cONEnUCt ION RAN
(See Peni it Appl ication)
PRE-NSWA PROVISIONS
(See State Authurizatauni
PRECIOUS METALS
(See Recycle)
PRIMARY TREA’INEMT
(See Treetsunt)
PROCEDURE
(See Ten MetNode(
PROCESS WASTES
(See Hezerdoue Waste Identificaticn(
PROCESSOR EEQUIRENRMrS
(Sn Used O lI
PROTSCTIVS FILERS
(See Interim Statue Pcuceee(
P 1 1 9 1.10 PARTICIPATION
(See aleo Closure Procese. Poet-Clo!ure)
•CLOSVRS PLAN PUBLIC 0G9(ENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
•PUSLIC COMMON! PERIODS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
CLARIFICATION OF EPA’S GUIDANCE ON 000ED1NTION OP CLEAN-UP ACtIONS UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO ECRA MID CSRCLA
ENHANCED PUBLIC PABTI IPATION AND STRONGER COMBUSTION PERNITFINO REOUIRRMSNTS
FIELD ASSESSMENT Al tO PUBLIC I1flOLVERENT PLAN FOR THE OCCIDENTAl. (MCI I IERATOR
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OP NERVE P S)flS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMVnIHG
RCRA SEPANDSD PARTICIPATION RULE
RCRA PSRMITS WITH NSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLI ISSUED PERMITS
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
(See alSo SW-846(
ANALYTICAL. MSTHDDS/EP TOXICITY TSST/REPERRHCE STDS
QC REVIEW OP PERMIT DATA
QUALITY ASSURANCE PSOISCI’ PLANS AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR SCRA GROUND-WATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ACTIVITIES
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTESI
RCRA MSTHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
ROtA METHODS AND QUAL iTY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SW-846 METHODS MANUAL
REEF / /
REEF F /
IREF P’ /
REEF / /
REEF / /
SEEP / /
SEEP / /
tEE ? I F
KEEP /
9476 1957(07) 11/01/87
9525 19901DI) 00101/90
9502 1997(01) 04/17/97
9505 1.991(01) OS/23/54
9505 1996(01) 09/19/56
9501 1986(011 09/11/56
9505 1995(01 ) 12/20/95
9502 1957(06) 06/30/07
XREY / /
9445 1954 (02) 04/23/54
9442 1990(04) 11/01/90
9445 1993 (06) 07 107193
9445 1985(04) 06/30/05
9445 1904)05) 12/20/64
9445 1994 (011 04/23/84
9521 00-12 03/30/87
9445 1957)02) 09/36/87

-------
07 (06/90 ESYNGRO INDEX Page 110. 112
RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES
(See Msxed Waste under Mixed Rad ioact lve/Radjoactjve WaEteEI ERR? I /
RAGS AND WIPERS
(See Solvents) /
RCPA
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface) ARE?
ROOk FACILITY ASSESSMENT IRPA)
(See Corrective Action) XREF / I
RCRA/CERCLA INTERFACE
XREF / /
ACLo WIDER THE RCRA AND CERCI.A PROGRAMS. USE OP 9481 1906106) 00106/86
APPLICABILITY OF RCR.A LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CSRCIIA RESPONSE ACTIONS 9553.1989102 ) 11/13/89
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO REINIJECTION OF TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CEACLA AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 9554 1989105) 12/20/89
DELISTING. INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U S NAMEPLATE PANY 9413 1907 (07) 02/25/87
FEDERAl. FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016 9502 1907(03) 03/06/87
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL 9444 1907(26) 07/02/87
GENERATOR LIAB iLITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES 1905 1041 11/23/05
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CI.AA1FICATIONS 9551 19871011 01/20/87
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1966(08) 04/30/86
RCRA PERMIT REAUT14ORIEATION ISSUES III REGION • 9541 1905101) 03/06/15
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEANUP OP FINAL NFL SITES lINGER B 9502 1990(02) 07/11/90
CERCLA (Superfund)
APPLICABILITY OF SUPERPUND LOt GUIDES 9553 1991115) 01/07/93
CLARIFICATION OP EPA ’S GUIDANCE ON COORDIBTIGN OP CLEAN-UP ACTIONS UNDERTAIEN PURSUANT TO RCRA AND CEECLA 9502 1997(511 04/17/97
CLARIFICATION OP NOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY 10 SERVICE STATION DEALERS ’ THAT HANDLE USED OIL 9592 1994(12) 11/10/94
COORDINATION BETWEEN RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION AND CLOSURE AND CERCLA SITE ACTIVITIES 9502 1996 (04) 09/24/96
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP). CONTENTS AND USE OF 9502.1907(04) 03/03/87
NAEARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND RCRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES 9572 t980(03) 12 /23 /08
hOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS. CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OP NUNICIPIL SPONSORS OF 9441 19061191 DI /20116
LIAEILITT AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9451.19861071 03/24/86
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER ACRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF 9432 1907112) 10/20/07
RCRA
CLARIFICATION OF EPA’ S GUIDANCE O il COORDINTION OF CLEAN-UP ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO RCRA AND CERCLA 9502 1997(01) 04/17/97
COORDINATION BETWEEN RçEA CORRECTIVE ACTION AND CLOSURE AND CERCLA SITE ACTIVITIES 9502 1996 (04) 09/24/96
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/07 9522 1900(051 11/30100
O%IHRR/OPERATGR IJIR1RR ACRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION 9432 0907(12) 10/28(07
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES 9451 1909 (01) 05/03/89
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c) (2) OF ECU 9480 1907(02 1 10129/07
UIC CORRECT! VS ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION 9502 00-1 ca/OS/aS
Tax
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY. WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX 9441 1906(41) 05/20/06
Treatab l l lty Study
TREATASILITY STUDIES S9ISPLE EXEMPTIoN 9441 1989(66) 11/01/89
DESIGNATW FACILITY UNDER TEE TREATASILITY STUDY EXCLUSION 9432 1991(011 09/27/91

-------
07/06/99
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 113
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATAE1LITY STUDIES 9441 1992(30) 09109/92
5D b PERI4IT
XREF / /
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CALMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RD&I) PERMIT 9412 1995(01 ) 11/19/85
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATEO SOIL USING MOEILE INCINERATION 9433 1916110) 04/24/96
ELIGIBiLITY OF iN-SITU VITRIFICATION TECHNOLOGY TO RESEARCH. DEVELOPMENT. AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITTING 9503 1993 (01) 12/02/93
RORO PERMIT FOR 9. SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WA SY 9503 51-lA 12/24/95
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATHENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNITIVERTSCH) 9412 1996(06) 02/06/96
REACTIVE WASTES
(See Characterietac Hazardous Waste) XREF / /
RECLAMATION
(See aleo Solid Waete• Recycle, Sotventu, Used ow XREF / /
CLOSED I.OOP RECYCLING 9471 1989 (061 12/01/99
•CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HANDLING SCRAP METAL RECLAMATION 9502 1995 (041 06/01/95
•DEFINITION OP SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION 1997(37a) 09/01/97
•EXPORTING NAZAROOIJS WASTE 9456 1997(011 09/01/El
•NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS 9441 1988(13 ) 04/01/Re
•PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION 9441 1995(29 ) 0e/01/9S
‘SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF 9441.1996459) 06/01/ES
‘SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID 9441 19R6( 17) 02/01/96
‘SPENT LEAD ACID BATTERIES 9497 19E9(01) 01/01/99
‘SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND COUNTING REQUIREMENTS 9497 1995401) 06/01/95
‘EQO QUANTITY DETERMINATION MULTIPLE COUNTING EXEMPTION 9441 1996(64) 09/01/96
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SiLVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS 9496 1994(01) 02/28/94
ARE RECOVERED SOLVENTS STILL EXEMPT IF LESS THAN 100% OF THE RECOVERED PRODUCT IS RETURNED TO THE ORIGINAL PROCESS 9441 1997(05) 06103197
RATTERY RECONDITIONING 9441 1996(56) 07/29/86
BRIQUETTING OF FLUE DUST 1K061) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION 9441 19R7 (SE) 07/31187
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL IM 1E eo’ppnjqs 9441 t9E6(17) 05/01/86
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER 9493 1995 (03) 11/25/es
CNLOROPLUOROCARRONS (CFCsI AS REFRIGERANTS, RECYCLING OF SPENT 9441 1999 140) 09/02/89
CLARIPICATION OP RCRA REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO TI lE USE OP PERCNLOROETW(LENE IN DRY-CLEANING PROCESS 9441 1994(15) 06/10/94
CLARIFICATION OF THE TERM WNEN’ IN 40 CFR 261 2(c) 9441 1993(09) 05/06/93
CLARIFICATION OP THE USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AND NOW THEY APPLY TO USED OIL CONTAMINATED WITH NCFCR 9192 1993(02) 04/05/93
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT 9441 1994(25) 09/29/94
CLARIFICATION ON. MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. F003, FOIS, DOOl, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING. AND TREA’I7IENT STANDARDS FOR CFC 9441 1994(26) 09/29/94
COIOIERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLING A M1X11.JEE OF 9441 19961)4) 04/29/86
COUNTING DRY CLEANING INDUSTRY WASTE ONLY AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - SOD RULE 9441 1996(67) 09/09/96
DETERMINATION REGARDING ‘TEE REGULATORY STATUE OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM 9441 1994(29) 11/09/94
DISPOSAL OR RECLAMATION OF RAGS 9444 1999(12) 10/20/R9
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION 9441 1989(15) 04/05/99
ETCHANTS USED TO MAMUFAC7 JRE COPPER SALTS 9441 1996(92) 11/09/96
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDOR RECYCLING/RECLAMATION 9441 1989 (10) 03/27/39
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9441 1994(09) 03/30/94
INTERPRETATION OH REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED 9444 1994(03) 03/31/94
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1986(43) 05/30/96
MERCURY THERMOMETERS, RECLAIMED On-SPEC AND BROKEN 9441 199e(27) 04/02/E6
MERCURY. REF iNING/REUSE OF SCRAP 9441 1986(06) 01/21/96
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1989(14) 04/02/89
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 9441 1996(301 04/16/86
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREA’IIIENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM 9471 1988(04) 10/27/Es
PHOTOGRAPHIC flEER RECYCLING 9496 1990(01) 07/16/90

-------
07/06/90 ESYWORD INDEX Page No 114
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS All INDUSTRIAl. FURNACE 9432 1987113) 13/10/I l
RAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND F-WASTES. HANDLING 9441 1909150) 10/20/09
RECLAIMED METHANOL 15 A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE 9441 1985133) 10/23/05
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AIJTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONiC DEVICES 9432 2909103) 06/06/09
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES 9641 1985119) 11/35/05
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATFEEIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT SUPPLIES 9441 1006(05) 11/19/06
RECYCLING NICKEL. COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES 9441 1900)09) 04/06/80
RECYCLING OP MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS 9441 1906(011 01 106/06
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OP SPENT SOLDER BATHS. ALSO KNOWN 9441 1993(17) 09 120/93
REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCRA ON TI IS STATUS OP ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE 1994109) 12/19/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST THAT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER ZINC METAL 9441 1)94 (31) 12/20/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTiCLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS IR1 19931151 09/14/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF DISULPIDE OIL WHICH IS BURNED IN A SULFURIC ACID FURNACE 9441 1993 (10) 06/02/93
REGULATORY STATUS OP NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA 9442 1994(061 07/29/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP PLASTIC CHIPS PROM RECLAMATION OP LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9441 1993(13) 00/04/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPALAEION AND RICOVERY SYSTEMS SAREI( PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PB1IDLEUM REF iNERY OlI.Y WASTES 9432 1993101) 03/05/93
REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT POIRIDRE SAND UNDER RCRA t995 110 1 03/00/95
REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES SHIPPED TO A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER FOR RECLAMATION 5497 1996401) 06/19/96
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT SOLVER BATHS, ALSO SHOWN AS POT DIMPS 9441 1993)19) 09/34/93
REPROCESSING OP BATTERIES 9497 1907 )02) 02 1 19/ 17
RBSIIRJE FROM SPENT SOLVUIT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HA1ARVOUS 9441 1984 (03) 02116/84
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES 9444 191813 11 00/26/00
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY. CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR 1907101) 81/06/07
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 1906(091 12/02/06
SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS 9441 1995(22) 06/19/95
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED 9497 1987(03) 04117/07
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES MANAGEMENT 9497 3909 (02) 10/19/09
SPEWS PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS ( lOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1906 (61) 00/10/06
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS 9441 3987 (39) I5l20/07
STILL BOTTOM WASTR GENERATED DURING ‘INS PRODUCTION OF POLYSTYRENE 9441 1908 (40) 09/01/OR
THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYORODSCIILORINA’flON PROCESS BY-PRODUCT E-WASTRS 9444 1987(44) 10/16/07
TRANSPORTATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERY COMPONENTS THAT ARE SNIPPED OPFSITE FO X RECLAMATION 9497 1997(01) 05/30/97
VARIANCES PROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260 31(b ) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS 1994 (02) 11/15/94
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM EILNS I9OR(Ila) 01/26/88
Recovery
•ENSRGY RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXIMPTION 9495 1994 (01) 05/01/94
•HAZARDOUS WASTR FUEL IN INCINERATORS 9441 1906(07) 11/01/86
•OFF-SPECIFICATION CIRCUIT PRINTING BOARDS - REGULATORY STATUS 9441 19911141 00/01/91
•RERUTTABLE PRRSIJMPTION FOR CPC-CONTANIHATED USED OIL 9592 1996(091 12/01/96
•RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS REGULATORY STATUS 9444 1992107) 11/03/92
•RECOVERED MATERIALS. FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OF 9493 1986(02) 03/01/R6
REGENSRATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9497 1994 (0 1) 11/01/94
•REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA 9498 1984 (30) 10/01/94
•USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS HAZARDOUS NASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY’ 9592 1994111) 09/01/94
APPL1CARIL)TY OF P006 HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELECTROLESS NICERL PLATING SPENT SOLUTIONS 94 19941001 09/21/94
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN EPA’S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL 9441 1P95117I 05/03/95
CLARIFICATION AS TO WNETNRR USED FIXER iS A BY-PROOUCT AND HOT SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED 9441 1995(2’) 06/16/95
CLARIFICATION OP RECYCLED USED OIL MNIADD4ENT STANDARDS AS THRY APPLY TO WASTENATSR TRRATI4ENT ACTIVITIES 9592 1994(02) 03/22/94
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNiTS USED IN PHOTO PROCESSING 9441 1995 (26) OR/04/95
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USED OIL BEING RURNRD IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILER 9494 1994(02) 02/00/94
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT 9450 1994 (03) 05/26/94
CLASSIFiCATION OP OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9498 1993(04) 12/17/93
COPPER-REARING SSCONDARY MATERIALS AS FEEDSTOCK 9441 1908108) 03/22/BR
DEFINITION OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING. MELTING. AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS 9406 1993101) 12/06/93
DETERMINATION WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE 9461 1995124) 06/30/95
EPA’S NON-OBJECTION TO IMPORTS OF COBALT OXIDE-MOLYBDIC OXIDE SPENT CATALYSTS INTO THE U S FOE RECOVERY 9456 19961011 02/15/96

-------
07/06/SB KEYWORD INDEX Page No 115
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441.1990(33) 07/27/Be
INTERPRETATION R GARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OP SILVER RECOVERY UNITS UNDER RCRA REGULATIONS 9441 1994(20) 10105194
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS UNDER THE RCRA OF CERTAIN METAL-RICH SLIJDGES 9441 1996(05) 06/19/96
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION 1985(06) 10/29/09
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM SATTERIES 9455 1991(03) 12/10/91
RECYCLING OP ZINC OXIDE RAGNOUSE DUST 1987(25) 11/04/07
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT ‘POPPING FURNACE’ 9499.1994(02) 09/19/94
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OP A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECNNDLOGIES (MRT) 9441 1994(23) 00/19/94
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OP A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURV CONTAMINATED SOILS PROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS 9498 1993(03) 11/29/91
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO NO NASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE RILAYERED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TSDF 9441 1994 (27) 10/04/94
REGULATORY STATUE OP ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUET 9441 1995(03 ! 02/06/99
REGULATORY STATUS OP CHOPLINE RESIDUE 9441 1996(10 ! 11/07/96
REGULATORY STATUS OP NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE 9442 1994(05) 04/15/94
REGULATORY STATUE OP NDN-LIETED SLUDGE THAT 1$ BEING RECYCLED 9441 1994(17 1 06/10/R I
REGULATORY ETATUS OP USED N1CKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES 9441 1993(20 ! 10/22/93
REGULATORY ETATUS UNDER RCRA OP COPPER OTCHANTE 9442 1996(03) 10/24/96
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES 9407 19e6(0B) 05/27/06
E1LVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY 9441 1907(02) 01/06/07
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEETREAMS PROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 9441 1909(49) 12/06/04
SPENT AND RECLAII4ED SOLVENTE. BLENDING OP RECLAIMED XYLWE 9441 1997(24) 04/19/07
EPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY. WAETE MANAGEMENT TAX 9441 1986(41) 05/20/06
STILL 0011GM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION 9441 1907(30) 09/01/07
TC RULE - IMPLEMENTATION 9441 1990(29) 10/01/90
USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH USED OZL AND PROVIDE LITTLE OR ND ENERGY WNEN BURNED 9592 1996104) 00/14/96
USED OIL. BURNING OF OFP-SPECIPICATION FUEL - DUMPING 9441 1906(40) 07/31/06
USED REFRIGEAANTS UNDER 40 CPA 261 2 9411 1990(20) 10/00/90
Unuaed Materiela
•DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT FOR SOLID WASTE DETERMiNATION VS HAIARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATIGN 0441 1996(07) 00/01/96
•UHUSED fORMULATIONS CONTAINING SODIUM PRNTACNLCADPNEHATE ARE P027 9414 1994 (06) 00/01/94
CLARIFICATION OP CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES 9571 1993)02) 11/05/93
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUELS. RECYCLING OP UNUSED 9441 1989(39) 07/31/99
RETURNED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS 9455 1991(02) 05/16/91
AECOVRAED OIL
(Eee Ueed Oil) KARP F /
RECOVERY
(See Reclamation) KEEP / /
EECYCLS
(See aleo Reclamation, Solid Wane) KEEP I /
‘CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING EXCLUSION 9441 1991(02) 02/01/93
‘COOIDANT RECYCLING AND USED OIL PROCESEING 9592 1996 (05) 11/01/96
‘DEFINITION OF SOLID WAETB 9441 3987 (40) 05/01/07
‘DEFINITION OP SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION 1907(37a) 00/01/87
‘EXPORTING HAEARDOUS WASTE 9456 1907(01) 00/01/07
‘LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL WASTE 9593 1995401) 12/01/95
‘PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUI4ULATION PROVISION 9441 1995(29) 00/01/95
‘RECOVERED MATERIALS. FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OP 9493 1906(02) 03/01/86
‘RECYCLED USED OIL - TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING. COURT DECISION 9433 1900(02) 11/01/Be
‘RSCYCLING PRESUMPTION UNDER PART 279 9592 1996(06) 11/01/96
‘REGULATION OF NICIEL/CADMILM BATTERIES AS ECRAP METAL WHEN RECYCLED 9441 1990(13d1 05/01/90
‘SHAM RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED RIPe 9400 1991(05) 10/01/91

-------
07/06/98 KEY’ ED IN EI Page NO. 116
‘SMALL QUANTITY DETERMINATION FOR SOLVENT RECLAIMER 9411 1907(10) 02/01/61
‘SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOR SPILLED COMI4ERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 9441J995(20) 05/01195
SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLiNG TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES 9581.1968)01) 11/01/88
‘STATE AUTHORIZATION AND USED OIL RECYCLED THROUGH SOME OTHER MEANS THAN BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9592.1996(07 ) 11101/96
STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING 9475 1987)01) 0 1/01/87
‘THE DEFINITION OF USED OIL 9592 1997(02) 04/01/97
‘USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT 9493.1905(06) 12/01/85
‘USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS. HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY? 9592.1991(11) 09/01/94
‘WASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES THAT RESD LE CONVENT iONAL MASTS IWIADEMEIFT PRACTICE 9561 1994(021 07 101/94
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS. REGULATION OF 9441.1987(14) 03/06/81
BATTERY RECONDITIONING 9441 1986(56) 07/28/86
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT 9497.1987)01) 02/12/81
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES 9442.1989(09) 11/03/89
BRASS DROSS SKl*IINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES. BY-PRODUCT 9441 1985)21) 06/06/85
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANR BOTTOMS 9441.1906(37) 05/01/86
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER 9493 1985(03 ) 11/25/65
CHLOROFLUOROCARBDN RECYCLING 9441 1988(32) 07/21/88
CLARIFICATION OF HOW PROVISIONS IN CZRCLA APPLY TO SERV)CS STATION DEALERS’ TI(AT HANDLE USED OIL 9592 1994112) 11/10/94
CLARIFICATION OP HOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO DFF-SPSC1PICATIOH FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441.1994)18) 07/11/91
CLARIFICATION OF 1115 DEFINITION OP COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY & DISPOSAL CAPACITY VIS-A-VIS RCRA SECTION 3004(1) 9442 1996(02) 07/05/96
CLARIFICATION OF 17)5 TERM WHEN’ IN 40 CFR 261 2(C) 9441 1993)08) 05/06/93
CLARIFICATION OP USED OiL REGULATIONS PERTAINiNG TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USED OIL BEING BURNED IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILER 9494.1994 (02) 02/08/94
CLARIFICATION ON MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. FOO l. FOOl. 0001. WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING, AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC 9441. 1994)26) 09/26/94
CLEAN SOLVENT FROM RECYCLED SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE • STILL BOTTOMS 9441 1987(26) 04/17/87
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS 9477 1984)01) 01/12/04
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO CORE) 9441 1987(98) 12124/81
COLLECTION AND RECYCLING OF HOUSEHOLD BATTERIES 9591.1997)05) 05/16/97
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOBILES 9441 1985(02) 01/16/85
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLiNG A MIXTURE OF 9441 1986(34) 04/28/86
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS VERSUS BOIL AMENDMENTS 9493 1987(01) 09/03/81
DEFINITION OF I 1IE CHARACTERiSTIC OF REACTIVITY AS IT PSRTAINS TO AEROSOL CANS 9413 1997101) 05/19/97
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS 9411 1986(62) 11/08/86
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE T IlE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED 9493 1986(03) 06/21/86
EXPORT REOUIREIIENTS FOR SPENT BATTERIES SENT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR RECYCLING 9499 1987)01) 06/19/87
PLUS DUST AND METAL HYDROXiDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION 9441 1989(10) 03/27/89
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING) 9441 1988)48) 11/21/88
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY 9441.1987(13) 03/04/87
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLO AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9441 1994(06) 03/30/94
GENERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE 9453 1987)04) 01/14/67
mJIDANCE FROM THE US SPA OH THE CRUSHING OF MERCURTCONTAINING LAMPS 9441.1995(21) 06/05/91
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312. REGULATION OF 9494 1986)04) 04/11/86
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLSRS 9461 1966 lOll 06/31/BE
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS 9441 1993114) 09/01/91
HAZARDOUS WASTES TIIAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING 9441.1986 (76) l0/08/8
INCINERATOR RESIDUES/RECYCLING DEFINED/ACCUMULATION 9591 1989)06) 05/03/89
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING NAZAIDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED ILOUISIA3IA REG) 9494 1587)02) 04/35/87
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS. STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTZS FROM 9441.1988 (SB) 12/07/88
LISTING OF TF-1. AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT 9442.1986)04) oS/o s/ OS
MJJ1AGSNENT OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED 9497 1993)01) 12/23/93
MiXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - FOOl-Fe l l s, REGULATORY ETATUZ OF 9441. 1964 (06) 04/10/64
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9494 1987)03) 08/31/87
MOBILE RECYCLING UNiT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 9441 1986)30) 04/16/86
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER. GENERATOR OETERMINAT1ON FOR 9412 1966(11) 06/06/66
NICREL-CADMIUII BATTERIES RECYCLING 9493.1991(02) 05/30/91
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUELS. RECYCLING OF UNUSED 9441 1989(39) 07/31/89
ON-SITS RECYCLING OF SPENT EOLVSNTS BY GENERATORS 5441 1966)21) 03/13/66
PICELS LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FIJRNACE 9432 1987(13) 11/10/87

-------
0 7/06/90 KEYWoRD INDEX Page No 117
POPPING FURNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATED ORDNANCE BY INCINERATiON - METALS RECOVERY 944 1 1983(04) 06/00/03
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION 9498 1991 041 09/30 191
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCNA3fl -REQUE5T FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION 9433 1995 (06) 10/29/05
RECOVERY OF SULFUR AND CHLORIDE FROM SLURRIED BAGHOUSE DUST 9441 1992(33) 10/09/92
RECYCLABLE CLOTN WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL W iPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES 9441 1986 (S3) 07/03/96
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE SLUDGES 9441.1995 (391 11/25/95
RECYCLED GASOLINE/HATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES 9441 1986(221 03/19/06
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES 9451 1909(01 ) 05/03/89
RECYCLING RECLUSION OP HASTES 9441 1990(061 03/19/90
RECYCLING HICKEL COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES 9441 1900 (09) 04/06/89
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST 9441 1990(27) 06/15/80
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPI.ATING SLUDGES (P008) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE 9441 1909(19) 04/26/99
RECYCLING OF 11061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT 9441 1990(03) 02/13/90
RECYCLING OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9497 1909(03) 11/17/09
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND r_PnING yp 9441 1906(01) 01/06/86
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS 9441 1991(17) 11/04/91
REGULATORY STATUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED BY TEXACO TO BR BUILT IN EL DORADO. KANSAS 9441 1995(18) 05/25/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST 9441 1995(03) 02/06/95
REGULATORY STATUE OP RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANINO FILTERS 9441 1992(11) 05/20/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP RRSIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1995104) 02/08/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA 9441 1995(10) 03/09/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND C099(ERCIAL/1NDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CAllS 9442 1993(02) 10/07/92
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES 9497 1997(02) 02/19/RI
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS 9441 1994(03) 02/16/94
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES TNAT ARE RECYCLED 9441,1996(79) 10/20/96
SECONDARY MATSRIALS REGULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID 9441 1999(23) 06/06/98
SLUDGE HASTE NAJIDLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS HITNDRAHN / FUIURR METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY 1996(17) 09/30/86
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 19BR(89) 12/02/86
SOLVENT STILL AS RECYCLING UNIT - REGULATORY STATUS OF 9441 199S(24) 06/27/85
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED 9497 1987 (031 04/17/97
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED IN PRODUCTiON OF FERRIC CHLORIDE 9441 1985(271 17/16/85
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO 9441 1985(201 06/05/85
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, HASTB MANAGEMENT TAX 9441 1996(4 I I 05/20/96
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY 9441 1990(191 05/26/98
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCS FERTILIIER 1985(02) 11/14/85
STATUS OF UNLISTED CWI4ERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS HNEI( RECYCLED 9444 1991(01) 02/23/93
STILL BOTTOM HASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION 1997(38) 09/01/97
STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT 9453 1989(04) 04/18/89
STORAGE PSRMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN HAZARDOUS HASTE RECYCLING 9441 1999(11) 03/27/09
TANK I’RRATHENT SYSTEM OF METAL-RICH RINSEHATBRS 1990(01) 06/01/90
It RULE - IMPLEMENTATION 9441.1990(29) 10/01/90
THE RSGUI.ATONY STATUS UNDER RCA OF CERTAIN VITRIFICATION PROCESSES FOR EPENT ALUMINUM POTLINER (X088) 9441.1997(07) 07/30/97
TEE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 9441 1995(31) 09/14/95
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITE SNIPPED FOR RECYCLING. REGULATION OF 9441 1906(14) 02/25/86
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATHENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLES 9432 00-1 02/11/16
NO HASTE OIL MANAGEMERT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS 9495 1991(01) 06/05/91
USE OF ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR 82 FUEL OIL IN MANUFACTURING ANFO BLASTING AGENTS 9592.1994 (01) 01/10/94
USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVSRY, INTERPRETATiON OF SUBPART E 9495.1989(01) 05/15/89
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING HITN HAZARDOUS HASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED 9441 1994(30) 10/22/84
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION 9441 1990(30) 10/30/90
USED OIL FILTERS. REGULATORY DETERMINATION 9442 1990(05) 10/30/90
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS HASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION 9441 1996(11) 02/11/86
HASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION fl 1986(02) 03/19/96
HASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR HASTE FURLS . INFORMATION REQUIRED 9441 1996 (00) 01/24/96
Preciouc Metale
•RXPORT OF RECYCI.ARLS MATERIALS 9456 1986(01) 10/01/96

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 116
‘GENERATOR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PART 266, SUBPART F , PRECIOUS METALS 9496 19971011 04/0 1/97
‘NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS 9441 19611131 04/04/08
‘PRECIOUS METAL RECYCLING IEILVER) . SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441.1985 (20.) 07/01/fl
APPLICABILITY OP RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS 9496 19941011 02/21194
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL. AND PRECIOUS METALS 9441.190S 44) 12/18/85
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER USSD FIXER IS A BY-PRODUCT’ AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED 9441 19951271 00116/95
CLARIFICATION OP THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED IN PNOTO PROCESSING 9441 1995426) 08/04/95
CLASSIFICATION OF OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE 9490 1993(041 12/17/93
DEFINITION OF INDUSTR1AL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING, MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS 9408 19931011 12/06/93
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTIL iZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION 9455.1991 (01) 02/05/91
INTERPRETATION REGARDING tIE REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS UNDER RCRA REGULATIONS 9441 19941211 10/05/dI
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 19914057 10/11/91
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991104) 10/11/ 1
PNOTOGRAPNIC FlIER RECYCLING 9496 19901011 07/16/90
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AUTOPOTIVE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES 9432 1989(03) 06/06/09
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS WHERE PRECIOUS METALS ARE RECLAIMED 9551 1989(03) 12/2D/89
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT SUPPLIES 9441 1906(65) 11/19/IC
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES 9496 1993(011 12/27/93
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS 9498 1993(03) 11/29/93
SILVER IN WASTES AND IN SEWER DISCHARGES FROM DIE PHOTO-FINISHING INDUSTRY 9443 1906(151 06/26/ES
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC 1NDUSTRY 9441 1957(02) 01/06/07
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR 9443 1987(011 01/06 1 17
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING RATR SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY 9441 19894341 07/06/09
USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL ‘ SILVER RECLAMATION 9441 19 16(421 05/20 186
Regeneration
‘REGENERATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9497 1994(01) 11/01/94
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCNLORIOE ARE NOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION 9456.1994(011 12/16/94
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9442 1966403) 04/02/86
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9441 1906(26) 04/03/86
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS 9489 1991(04) 0 1/02/fl
NOW TREATING FILTRATION MEDIA COMPARABLE TO ACTIVATED CARBON WOULD RE PERMITTED UNDER SCM 9409 1996102) 06/10/96
REGENERATION OP USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION 9441 1906151) 07/02/86
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES SHIPPED TO A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER FOR RECLAMATION 9497 1996(01 ) 06/19/O
SPENT PICNLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS 9441 1967(39 1 05/26/07
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR ESGEHERATION EXEMPTION 9497 1991(011 03/04/91
WOULD REGENERATION EXEMPTION APPLY TO VARIOUS TYPES OF LOCATIONS AT WHICH LEAD-ACID BATTERIES ARE REGENERATED? 9441 1999(01) 01/12/95
R ouEe
‘ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITS CONSTITUTER SEVER FOE THE GENERATOR PROCRSEING RXENPTION 9495 4994(011 05/01/94
‘FILTERS USED TO RECLAIM CFC REFRIGERANT 9441 1992(32) 09/01/92
‘GENERATION AND RECYCLING 9441.1881 (201 03/01/67
‘1(051 AND NSWA 9441 I985(28b) 07/01/ES
‘SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS 9441 1992(13) 05/01/92
‘SOLID AND RAEARDOUS WASTE. DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID 9441 1966(17) 02/01/86
BAGHOUSE DUSTS USED AS, OR TO PRODUCE, AGGREGATE 9493 1991(01) 06/21/91
ERIQUETTINO OP FLUE DUST (E061) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION 9444 1987(58) 07/31/87
CNLOROFLUOROCARBOHS (CFC S) AS REFRIGERANTS. RECYCLING OF SPENT 9441 1909(40) 00/02/ 19
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1994(13) 05/19/94
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO THE USE OF PERCHLOROSTNYLRNR IN DRY-CLEANING PROCESS 9441 1994 (15) 06/10/94
CLARIFICATION OH NOW REUSE OF ‘WASTE RESINS’ AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA 9441 1994(49) 07/11/94
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PELE (TOLEDO CO lE) 9441 1907175) 09/04/07
COLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTIERY MAIIUFACIURIIC OPERATIONS 9441.1968(17) 05/18/88
CO)04ERCIAL FERTILIZERS CONTAINING K061 WASTES 9493 1986405) 09/11/86
COUNTING DRY CLEANING INDUSTRY WASTE ONLY AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - SOG RULE 9441 1906167) 09/08/86
DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE ISSUES RELATED TO CLEANUP OF CULPEPER WOOD PROCESSING FACILITY 9441 1994(11) 11/13/98
DEIONIZATION ACID 9441 1986 (11) OS/12/86

-------
0 1/06 /98 EEYI400D (t IDES Page NO 119
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED, NOT A WASTE 9441 1986(191 05/12/86
DROSS PROM ALWIINUN SMELT ING USED IN MANUFACTURE OP CEWID?? 9441 1989 101) 01/07/99
EXCLUSIONS P0 1 IC-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL) 9441 1959149) 09/12/19
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS WIDER TEE RCRA OP CERTAIN METAL-RICH SLImGEE 9441.1996(05) 06/19/96
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECt Un (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1996(41) 05/30/66
MERCURY, REPINING/REUSE OP SCRAP 9411 1986(06) 01121/ 56
REGULATORY INTEEPRRTLT(ON ON RINSEIIATER PROM ALUMINUM AIIGDIZINQ 9441 1992(21) 07/21 /92
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OP OXYGEN ERSAYHING APPARATUS WEA l CANISTERS 9441 1994(10) 05/09/94
REGULATORY STATUS 8240 MANAGEMENT OP DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS 4210 WIPERS 9441 1953(19) 09/27/93
REGULATORY STATUS OP COAL TAR D1STILLATES 9441 1992(201 07/09/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND LIMITATIONS Cl i DISPOSAL AND REUSE 9440 1999(03) 01/21/89
REGULATORY STATUS OP DISULPIDE OIL WHICH 11 ECIRNED IN A SULFURIC ACID PURNACE 9441 1993 (10) 06/02/91
REGULATORY STA’Il)S OP HIGH PURITY CHEMICALS THAT ARE INITIALLY USED DY CUSTOMERS MD TEEN SOLD TO OTHER SUSINESSES POE fl$R’flIER USE 9441 1994(24) 09/10/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP RESIDUES PROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS TEAT RECYCLE 0069 WASTES 9441 1991(14s) 09/05/91
REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OP COPPER ETCEAN.I.S 9442 1995)03) 10/24/96
RESIDUES PROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS TEAT RECYCLE 4(959 WASTES 949S 1951101) 09 105/91
RSUSE/RSCYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT OH SPENT LEAD-ACID BAtTERY RECYCLING 9497 199S(01) 02/06/ES
SPENT ACIDS AS WATER CONDITIONIR 9411 1917 (72) 08/21/67
SPEW? FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS 9441 1995(21) 56/15/99
SPEW? PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE 9411 1986(61) 08/19/86
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. DEPSNTTION AS I4AEASOOUS 9441 1987(39) 05/20/97
SPENT PICRLR LIQUOR. REUSE OP 9441 1987)17) 03/31/fl
USE OP INDUSTRIA3 HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES AS FSSDSTGCE POE A CATALYTIC RETRACTION PROCESSING (CEP) UNIT 9*13 1996(01) 04 112/96
USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (0047) FROM WHICH SODIUM SULPITE IS RECOVERED AND WHICH IS USED AS A FUSL 9441 1997 (42) 06/09/87
USED 011. DESTINED FOR RECYCLING 9495.1987 106) 04/17/97
USED REPRIORRAIFIS UNDER 40 CPR 261 2 9441 1990429) 10 (18/90
VARIANCES PROM CLASSIPICAT1ON AS A SOLID NUTS UNDER 40 CPR 260 21 (b) POE SPENT CATALYSTS 9423 1994 102) 11/ZS/94
WASTE ACID AS WASTENATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER 9441 1996)90) 10/20/86
Use CGl%EIituttirg Dtspasat
USE OP USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPEES5AJIF 9592 1996 102) 02/15/96
USE OP WASTE LEATHER TRIFU IINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OP ASSORREO MATERIALS 9441 1996104) 06/11/96
USE COnst ituting Disposal
‘RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION 10251 4Ia)t9) 9441 1991)19) 12/01/91
‘USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL. RESIDUES PROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES 9493 1995(04) lI/al/ IS
APPLICABILITY OP RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 9592 1994 (06) 17/11/94
CLAP IPICATION ON NDW REUSE OP ‘WASTE RESINS AS FEED STOCE TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER ECRA 9441 1994(19) 07/11/94
COPPER PLATING SOLUTIdI9 9443 1996(04) 01/22/96
DECNARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF IIAEAADOUS WASTES TEAT HAVE UNDERGONE CHEMICAL SOLIDIFICATION 9493 2985405) 12/13/SS
DETSRWINATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM 9441 1994419) 10/09/94
NARARDOUS WASTE DETERJ IINATION OP ‘NICEEL MATTE’ DY-PRODUCT 9441 1994432 ) 13/23/04
K-WASTE PILTER CAKE IN ONE MAISIPACTURE OP CEMENT 9141 1990125) 12/21/90
PROPOSED RRET DEICNETEATED AVA ILABLE TECHNOLOGY )EDAT) FOR 0061 WASTE S441 1989(06) 03/09/99
RECYCLING OP COEE tI-PRODUCT RESIDUES 9441 19921171 10/29/92
REGUlATORY DEIER04 1NATIONS UNDER ROXA OH TNS STATUS OP ZIEC OXIDE PRODUCED BY All ELECTRIC ARC STSEL FURNACE 1994(09) 12/19/94
REGULATORY STATUS OP DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES 1993(03) 09/09/93
REGULATORY STATUS OP TUE )4AAUPACT1JRE AND USE OF WASTE-DERIVED FERTILIZER 9493 1993 (01) 09/23/92
SECONDARY MATERIAL EURJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER TEE US-CANADIAN bILATERAL TREATY 9441 1985(291 06/15/69
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CNLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION 9444 1996 (20) 09/29/96
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OP 9441 1997)17) 03/31/97
USE OP PETBCI.SUN-COWLRN INATSD SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASP hALT SAItN2NG 9453 1991)021 04/20/91
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS IRGREDIEI0T IN FERTILIZER 9441 1939(001 10/20/96
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTiLIZER 9441 1997 (61) 09/12/97

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 120
REFINERY WASTE
I See Petroleum Refinery Wastes) XREF I I
REGENERATION
(See Recycle) XREF I #‘
REGULATED UNIT
(See also Corrective Action. Groundwater Monitoring) XREP / I
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 9S02 1936(13) 03 122/86
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMIJs •flIAT NAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER 9481 1987(05) 06 ,17 ,8 ,
Definition
•BDAT FOR WASTEWATER 9432 1986)16) 12/01/86
‘ELECTROPLATING AND EIiRCTRDLESS PLATING LISTINGS 9432 1939 (011 03/01/39
‘HOUSEHOLD HASARDOUS WASTE 9441 2983(30) 06/01/33
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFIN1TIOES 95S1 1936(23 1 12/01/86
‘REMDVAL OF it WASTE FROM A EDRPACR IRPOUNI RNT 9443 1991(02) 11/01/91
•EEINNER LIST 9445 3935(03) 08/01 ,35
‘SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID 3441 1936(17) 02/01/86
‘TANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS 9432 1988(03) 03/01/88
‘USED OIL. DEFINITION OF 9431 1983(01) 01/01/88
‘WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION 9432 1988(05) 10/01(39
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROEIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9441 1987(19) 09/14/87
BATCH. DEFINITION OF 9432 1989(05) 12/05/89
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 9411 1986(03) 01/09/86
BULEIIG OR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION 9432 1990(02) 03/01/90
DEACTIVATION (POPPING) FURNACES AS INCINERATORS 9432 1987(07) 07/37/87
DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE ISSUES RELATED TO CLEAMIP OF CULPEPER WOOD PROCESSING FACILITY 9441 1996)11) 11/13/96
EMPTY CONTAINERS REGULATORY STATUS 9412 1990(03) 09 (11/90
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1987(03) 05/01/81
GEWERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SNIPS, DEFINITION 9432 1986(05) 02/05/86
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR 9412 1985(08) 11/25/85
NOLOINO. TEMPORARY. PERIOD. STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS) fl 1996(12) 07/24/86
IN-EXISTENCE AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION-OEFINITIONE 9432 1989(02) 05/16/89
INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN RO lLER DEFINITION ((.UBRIEOL) 9432.1955(10) 52/30/85
LIQUID. FREE LIQUID. RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS 9432 1989(04) 07/30/89
MARINE DERRIS IN WATID(E. DISPOSAL OF 9432 1987( 12e) 11(04/87
OPERATED TO CONTAIN. DEFINITION 9483 1989(06) 11/30/99
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1986(08) 04/30/86
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION 9483 1999(18) 12/12/88
ELUDGR DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT 9432 8987(08) 08/03/87
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY 9522 1983(02) 03/07/88
SLUDGE DETER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WNTU EEEMPTION 9432 1986(011 01/06/86
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 lul 9502 1987(07) 07/24/87
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u). DEFINITiON OF 9502 00-6 0 1/02 131
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY 9432 1988(01) 02/11/88
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SU8JECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES 9432.1986 (04) 01/21/86
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED. FLOORED STRUCTURES. REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF 9432 1987(02) 04/02(87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGNDUSE SYSTEM 9432 1986(15) 12122/86
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A EAGNOUSS SYSTEM 9432 1987101) 03/17/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL. RECYCLER 9432 00-1 02/11/86
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c) (2) OF RCRA 9480 1987(02) 10/2918 7

-------
07/06/98 CEG Page No 121
F - Want e a
‘MIXED WASTE AND LAND BAN 9551 1989(02) 03101/89
REGULATED WASTES
(See Nazardoue Waste Identification. Eo1.id Waste) / /
REGULATION
ERR? / I
MARINE DEBRIS 1( 0 WATIRS 4 DISPOSAL OF 9432 1987(12a) 11/04/87
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT ISSUES (EEC 11) 9522.00-3 11/13/87
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGUlATIONS 9444 1990(05) 10/17/90
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES 9501 1987(03) 12/28/87
SEDINRIF? SAMPLR DISPOSAL 9441 1989(12) 03 131/89
TD4PORARY AND INFORMAL OEI.ISTI3CS AND IRIWA EFFECTS ON mj 9433 1988(14 ) 05 127/86
yAXIMA INDIAN NATION INVOLVEMENT IN RCAA ON TUBAl. 9431 19 90 (01) 11 105 /90
RELSASE
(See Corrective Action. Secondary ContairEsent( XRSF “
RDIEDIAT IOI0
(See correcttve Action) XR SF / /
REPORTiNG INPORMATION
(See also Generatora. IIotiC(cattenl ER0F / /
•BIEN3IIAI. REPORTING FOE WASTES ¶*EATSD 1(0 EXEMPT UNtIE 9454 k99fl0 2) 06/01/94
INrERFRNTATION OF TEE REPORTI)83 REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR 270 30(11 (10) 9934 1994(01 ) 07/19/94
MINERAL PROCESSING FACILITIES, REPORT TO CONGRESS 9475 1.989101) 02/09/89
R uED PERMITS - POLiCY GUIDANCE 9503 50-IA 32/23/89
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 270 30(i) (10) 9524 1981(01) 02/33/88
STATE/REGIONAL BIENNIAL REPORTS 9494 198S(OS( 01/13/86
RESIDUE
(See Derived-From Rule) XRSP / /
RETROFIT
tEen llininws Technological Esquire rits, Surface Is’pasndtsent) EE l? I /
REUSE
(See Recycle) XREF / /
E VA
(See RCRA Fecility Aaaeasnent( ERR? 1 /
RISE
(See Rink Assessment) nSF / /

-------
07 ,0 5 ,98 KEYWORD INDEX Page Plo. 122
RISK ANALYSIS
(See Risk Assessment) REEF 1 /
RISK ASSESSMENT
XREF / I
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR PAN’S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES 9551.1989(04) 07/06/89
110-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TK 1991(01) 01/29/91.
SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA 9498 1995(02) 11/30/95
Exposure Information
APPLICABILITY OF OMNIBUS AUTHORITY AND SITE SPECIFIC RISK A5SESSMENTS TO WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION 9458 1996 (05) 05/10/96
APPLICABILITY OP THE OMNIBUS AUTI(ORITY AND SITS SPECIFIC RISK ASSESEMENTS TO WASTE MINIM1IATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996(01) 02/26/96
ATSOR HEALTH ASSESSMENTS UNDER RCRA 3019 9523 1986(05) 11/21/U
SPA’S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1995 (06) 0S/23/96
EXPOSURE INFORMATION REPORT REVIEW IN CONJUNCTION WITH ATSDR 9523 1986 (02) 07/31/86
GUIDANCE ON USING ALTERNATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT APPPOACNES IN DETERMINING INCINERATOR METALS EMISSION LIMITS 9488 1992 (02) 11/17/92
,JONNSTON ATOLL CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM (JACADS) RISK RELATEO ISSUES 9498 1996(07) 10/02/96
Health Maccements
CORRECTIVE ACTION PlAN ICAP), CONTENTS AND USE OF 9502.1987(04) 03/13/87
HEALTH ASSESSMENT INFORMATIOI I IN LISTING DECISIONS 9442 1986(040) 05/09/86
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR CHEMICAL LIST 9445 1989(02) 07/28/89
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR PAN’S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES 9551 1989(04) 07/06/89
HEALTH STATUS OF PANe IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES 9551 1989(05) 08/12/89
HEALTH-EASED LEVEL FOR CYANIDE 9442 1988(02) 03/30/88
INCLUSION OF EMISSIONS FROM 08/00 UNITS IN THE HEALTH RISE ASSESSMENT FOR A CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL FACILITY 9489 1995(01) 01/30/95
JOHNSTON ATOLL CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM (JACADS) RISK RELATED ISSUES 9498 1996(07) 10/02/96
SU)0 RY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) 9523 00-12 03/30/El
Riek
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATHENT TECHNOLOGIES, APPLICATION OF 9486 1985)01) 03/27/85
JOHNSTON ATOLL CHEMICAL AGZH’I’ DISPOSAL SYSTEM (JACADS) RISK RELATED ISSUES 9498.1996 107) 10/02/96
Riek Analyate
EPA’E IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMRUSTION STRATEGY 9498 1996)06) 05/23/96
RISK-BASED METH000LUIIES OW LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9551 1986)07) 06/19/86
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS 9441 1986)25) 03/26/86
RUN-OFF
KREF I /,
LEA CNATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFe, WASTE PILES, AND LT UHITS HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF 9441,3984)3’) 11/14/84
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH) 9441 1986(31) 04/21/86
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIROHNENTAL RELEASSS FROM 9441 1986(28) 04/07/86
SAMPLE ANALYS1S
(See Analytic Methods) XREF / /
SAMPLING
(See Analytic Methode) KREP / /

-------
07/06/99
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 123
SANPLING PLAN
IEee Analytic Methods)
SANITARY LANDFILL
(See Municipal Landfill)
toes also Solid Waste)
‘CLARIFICATION OF BY-PRODUCT VERSUS SCRAP METAL
BATTERIES. SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
CLARI FICATSON ON MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBSR • F003 FOSS • DOS 1 • WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING, AND TREAI7IENT ETANDARDS FOR CRC
DROVE RECLA34ATIOII IN BRASS ISDEISTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED. NANDLING
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE MID SLECTRONIC DEVICES
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF SPENT SOWER BATHS. ALSO KNOWN AS ‘POT DUMPS’
REGULATORY REQUIREI4ENTS FOR OH-SITE TAEA’I14EWF OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS (ORA l CANISTERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT SOLDER BATHE . ALSO KNOWN AS ‘POT DUMPS
REGULATORY STATUS OP USED CWFTSNG OILS AND USED OIL COATED STEEL TURNINGS GENERATED DUE IWO MACN filING OPERATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OP USED RESIDENTIAL AND IMERCSALI INDUSTRIAL. AEROSOL CANS
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE AEROSOL CANS
SCRAP METAL REMOVED PEON SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE ESCYCLED
‘It RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING. REGULATION OF
Dental Amalgam
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTSSTS, DISPOSAL OF
SCRAP DENTAL AMALGAM
SCRUBBER
tEes also Sludge)
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO VARIOUS PRODUCTS IE 0 • CLINKER, FERTILIZER ) PRODUCED BY A CEMENT KILN EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCEURBEE
IS SCRUBBER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAS DESULPURIIATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE’
REGULATORY STATUE OF !R0 1 I INCLUDING CLINKER AND FERTSLIEER) PRODUCED IN CEMENT KILNS EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER
Baghousm Dust
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
SCRUBBER WATER
(See Incineration)
SECONDARY CONTAIP5IEIIT
(See also Tank System. Minimum Technological Requirements)
‘CHANOES AT iNTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
‘CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR TANKS
‘GENERATOR ACCUMULATION AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK REGULATIONS
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
‘INSPECTION REQU IREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANRS
‘INTEGP ITT ASSESSMENT FOE TANKS AND POST-CLOSURE
XREF / /
9441 1990 109A 1 03/01/90
9441 19B5 144) 1211B1B5
9441.1994(26) 09/2 1194
9441 19B9(15) D4105/B9
9441 1916176) 11/01/16
9432 I9B9103I 06/06/69
9441 199 1(17) 09/20/93
9441 1994 (10) 05/09/94
9441 19931151 09/14/93
9441 [ 993(1 11 09/24/93
9S92 1993 (09) 11/17/93
9442 1993 (02 ) 10/07/93
9442 19941011 01/04/94
9441 1966 (79) IO/20/B6
9441 1991(15) 09/25/91
9441 19E6(14 1 02/2S/96
9441 19991221 05/17/99
9441 19B9 1431 06/17/69
IREF / /
9441 1994 1141 06/09/94
9441 1999)14) 04/12/95
9441 1994)12) 05/17/94
9441 1916 (49) 06/10/96
KEEP
//
REEF / /
952B i9B7(09) 09/01/97
9493 1967(06) OS/0l/97
9483 1916(10) 11/01/96
9483 1996105) OE/01/B6
9483 1997(0 ) 05/01/97
9493 1999(13) 06/01/99
9493 1997(06) 05/01/97
9493 1999(04) 10/01/99
SCRAP METAL
KEEP
KEEP
/ 1
/ /

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 124
‘SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483.1988 (06 ) 04/01/88
‘SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR TANKS 9483.1987(13 ) 07/01/87
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483.19 59(07) 11/01/89
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS 9463 1986(08) 10/01/86
‘TANK INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS 9483 1987(15) 08/01/87
APPL1CARILITY OP EPA5 REGULATIONS TO INDOOR PIPING AND PLOW EQUALIZATION TANKS USED TO CONVEY SOLVENTS TO EXTERIOR TANKS 9463 1997(02) 01/29 (97
CLARIFICATION OP THE USE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TO CONTAIN HAZARDOUS WASTE SPILLS 94e3 1993(01) 10/07(93
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK STEMS 9493 1989(04) 03/16/88
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA IN THE DEFINITION OF TANK SYSTEM 9483 1989(07) 03/17/88
OPERATED TO CONTAIN. DEFINITION 9483.1989(06) 11/30(89
PUMP EXEMPTION FROM SECONDARY CONTAILO1DIT 9483 1988(11 ) 06/09(88
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTENS 9483 1989 (13) 03/14/89
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1987(16) 09/ 11/87
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ASOVE GROUND WELDED FLANGES AND SEALLESS VALVES 9483.1987(17) 09/23/87
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION 9483 1988(18) 12(12/88
STANDARDS FOE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1989(02) 01/09/89
TANK SYSTEM DESIGN-SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1987(05) 05/29/81
TEMPORARY PERIOD AND HOLDING DEFINED 9522 1986(01) 09/01/86
USE OF SILICA FUME LIOH1WEIGNT AGGREGATE CONCRETE LINERS AS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES IN HAIARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1997(01) 04/04/91
Canta inment
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATORY LANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES 9482 1999(91) 06/36/99
Leak Detection
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 19861071 10/01/86
‘LEAK DETECTION REQUIREMENTS FOE HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1986(03 ) 08/01/86
flEAK NOTIF1CATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9484 1985(92) 09/03/85
‘LEAK TESTING FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1986(13) 12/01/86
‘LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOE HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS. SURFACE IMPOUNDI4ENTS. AND WASTE PILES 9484.1992(01) 07/01/93
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF RELEASE FROM HAZARDOUS STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1988(10) 08/03/86
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR PIPING SYSTEMS 9483 0987(10) 07/09/87
Leekege
‘RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS 1986(05) 08/01/86
LEAKS. SPILLS. AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, HIKTURE RULE APPL1ED 10 9441.1986(07) 01/73/86
Re leaee
3008 (b) OF TI lE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT. INTERPRETATION OF 9503 1985(09) 13/16/85
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING. TREATHENT OF 9441 1986(86) 11/20/86
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9502 00-2 04/18/86
COREECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES 9507 1986(06) 04/15/86
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING 9444 1986(07) 04/07/86
FEDERAL FAC1LI IIEE INVENTORY UNDER ECRA 3016 9502 1981(03 ) 03/06/87
FORE TRAINING PITS. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR 9489 1987(02) 07/22/81
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDSJACL8 IN GRAFT NSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY) 9481 1987(02) 03/10/87
NINA APPLIED TO FEDERAL. FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE) 9502 1985(06) 10/29/85
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF MAIARDOUS WASTE 9432 1986(08) 04/30/86
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PEDCKDUREE AND AUTHORITIES 9S02 1986(12) 01/31/86
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. ECRA APPLICABILITY TO 9502.1987(05) 04/02/87
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (ul • DEFINITION OF 9502 00-6 03/02/87
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS. INFORMATION ON 9502 1986(OlaI 01/23/86
SUI0IARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TRAIl (PAT) C0101ENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/fl
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS• APPLICATION DF NOVEMBER 1998 DEADLINE TO 9S01 1985(01) 00/01/85
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1986(28) 04/07/86
Sweps
‘REGULATION OF LEACIOATE COLLECTION SUMPS 94971996(01) 07/01/96

-------
Page Ho. 125
07/06 /98 KEYWORD INDEX
•SIOIPS IN T IcS PART B PERMIT APPLICATION 9502 1985405) 01/01 /85
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY. MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) 9441 1986(13) 01/23/86
DRAINS AND TRENCHES ASSOCIATED WITH YANK SYSTEMS 9483 1986(12) 12/30/86
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOTS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA FOR DIRECT OFFLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED FUEL INTO A CEMENT KILN 9483 1988(02) 0 1/28/se
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING. REGULATION OF 9441 1986(14) 02/25/86
WOOD TREATHENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS 9441 1986 169) 09/12/86
SECONDARY MATERIALS
(See Solid Waete) EREF / /
SECONDARY TREATRE1F
(See Treatment) XREF / /
SECURITY
XREF / /
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES 94 3 1988(01) 06/02/E8
SEWAGE SLUDGE
(See Waatewater) EREF I /
SHAI4 RECYCLING
(See Boilers end Industrial Furnaces) XREF / /
SHOOTING RANGES
KEEP / /
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES 9441 1992102) 01/15/92
USE OF LEAD SNOT AT SHOOTING RANGES 9441 1992(31) 09/24/92
S1C CODES
XREF / /
REGULATION OF OILY HMARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE 9483 1991(01) 01/08/91
SIC CODE FOR A STEEL MANUFACI IJRER/PROCESSOR. PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE - POINT OF WASTE GENERATION 9441 1985(18) 05/21/85
S IGNATURES
(See Permit Application) XREF / /
SITING
See also Public Participation) KEEP / /
Capacity
‘TREATHENT CAPACITY 9525 1986(07) 12/01/86
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION 9489 1990(01 1 08/30/91
EXTENSION OF APPLICABLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9551 1988(09) 06/Il/E l
HAEARDOUS HASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND RCRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES 9572 I9EE(03) 12/23/88
NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEERIS 9551 1990(07) 10/14/90
NEW HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY SITING PREVENTIONS 9523 1987(02) 09/14/E l

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page Na. 176
Location -
CHARACTERISTIC RAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED A? PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REPINING SITES 9443 1966(16? 07/09186
COMSINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADiOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE 9480 00-14 03/13/87
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA 9541 1986(14) 07/03/66
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 9472 1991 (Dli 10/01/91
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES 9472 19661041 06104/66
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERI4IT DEADLUJES 9501 1967(03) 12/28/67
TIME OF TRAVEL METHOD FOR THE GUIDANCE CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING AREAS OP VULNERABLE NYDROGEDLOGY 72 1986106) 07/08/86
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE 9461.1987(01) 02/25/67
VULNERAELR HYDROGEOLOGY GUIDANCE CRITERIA 9481 1967103? 06/03/87
SEINNER LIST
(Sea Appendix IX) (See aleD Groundwater Monitoring, Delfating) EREF / /
SLUDGE
(See alec Wautewatarl XREF / /
POLLUTIGN CONTROL SLUDGE PROM TREATMENT OP MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION 9441 1965(09) 02/01/65
•SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF 9441 1986(59) 06/01/86
ACID PLANT ELOWDOWN SLURRY/SLUDGE PROM PRIMARY COPPER PRODUCTION 9441 1989(32) 07/06/89
CARSON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9441 1986(26) 04/02/86
CERTIPICATION/NOTIPICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUEJECT TO ae 955L1991(10( 06/05/91
CLARIFICATION OF TNE REGULATORY STATUS WIPER RCRA OP SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED IN PHOTO PROCESSING 9441 1995(26) 08/04/99
DETERMINATION WNETNER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER iS A SOLID WASTE 9441 1995(24) 06/30/95
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACNINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE P006 LISTING 9444.1987(01) 01/27/87
EXEMPTION FOR LIME STABILIZED PICXLE LIQUOR SLUDGE GENERATED BY THE IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY 9441 1996)09) 10/01/96
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION 9455 1991(01) 02/05/91
P006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY u4 1987(19) 09/22/87
P019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 1981(22) 06/24/57
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION 9441 1989(10) 03/27/89
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OP VARIOUS WASTES PROM 9441.1966(90) 12/07/68
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAN DILUTION 99S1 1990(06) 10/14/90
PETROLEUM REFINERY 1 1W, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-PROM RULES 9441 1965(29) 06/23/85
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES 9441 1985(39) 11/25/65
RECYCLING NICKEL. COPPER AND CRROMIUW-CON’TAIWINO ELECTRDPLATINO SLUDOES 9441 1968(08) Da/06/RR
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING ELUDGES (P006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE 9441 1969(19) 04/26/69
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST 944 ! 1995(03) 02/06/95
SCRUSEER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCEO IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1984 105) 02/19/84
SECONDARY SLUDGES FRO I SIOLGOICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS 9441 1985(08) 02/22/89
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY 9413 1966(17) 09 110/66
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE PIEST CLEANING STAGES OF PNOSPHATING PROCESS 9444 1996(11) OS/22/66
SLUDGES WITNIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. NEWLY REGULATED DUE TO TC RULE 9484 1991(01) 01/06 191
SUMMARY OP PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COISIENTS 9523 00-12 03/30/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATIIEITT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9432.00-1 02/11/66
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS. INFORMATION REOUIRED 9441 19R6(08) 01/24/86
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANDDIZIND OF ALUMINUM 9441 1986(29) 04/09/86
NASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES PROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACNLOROPNWOL 9444.1984 (04) 04/26/94
WHET hER SLUDGE FROM LIME TREATMENT OP A MIXTURE OF 1062 AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE QUALIFIES FOR THE LSWPLS EXCLUSION 9441.1998(12) 12/13/96
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AE FERTILIZER 9441 1967 (61) 08/12/87
ZINC PLATING, WAS’TSWATER TEEA174ENT SLUDGES GENERATED FROM 9441 1964 (79) 09/24/64
Baghouea Duet
‘BAGNOUSE DUST GENERATED FROM REMSLTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL 9444 1964(16) 08/01/64
BAGNOUSE FLUE DUET AND ZINC OSIDE SLUDGE USED IN ZINC CHEMICALS PRODUCTION 9441 1965(06) 02/13/65
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991(05) 10/11/91
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIIER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991(04) 10/11/91

-------
07/06/SE
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 127
RECOVERY OP SULFUR AND CHLORIDE FROM SLI1RRIED RAOHOUSE DUST 9441 1992133) 10/09/92
RECYCLING OF ZINC OXIDE BAGNOUSE DUST 9443 1997(25) 11/04/87
REGULATORY STATUS OP AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST T)(AT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER ZINC I IETAL 9441 1994(31) 12/20/94
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGNOUSE SYSTEM 9432 19971011 03/17/97
Zetasion Control Wastes
COAL/ FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE AT FOUNDRY NOT A K061 WASTE
EXEMPTION FOR CG)S(ERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE TIlE FERTILIZER 15 PRODUCED
E061. EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC FURNACES
REGULATORY STATUS OP NON- LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEING RECYCLED
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE X069 WASTES
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
Scrubber
CLARIFICATION ABOUT THE SCOPE OF EPA S ADMINISTRATIVE STAY FOR A PORTION OF THE K069 HAIARDOUS WASTE LISTING
IS SCRUBBER WASTE FRON A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAB DESULFURIZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE’
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
Sludge Dryers
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTENATER TREATMENT UNITE
RDSD PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A NASTEWATER SYSTEM
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWflJ EXEMPTION
SLUDGE DRYERS
(See Sludge)
SMALL QUANTITY OENERATOR
(See Generators)
SMALL QUANTITY HANDLER
(SEE UNIVERSAL WASTES)
SMELTING WASTE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOIL
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) REEF
SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) REEF
SOLID WASTE
(See also Recycle. Hazardous Waste Identification) REEF / /
•DSFINITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION 1997 137a) 09/01/El
SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION 9441 1995 lI9a) 05/01/ES
•SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION 9441 1992104) 02/01 192
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVDJTS 9441 1986)54) 07/15/96
9441 1994 (20) 05/16 194
9441 1994(091 05/03/94
9493 1996(03) 09/21/ES
9444 1993 (02) 07/11/93
9441 1994 (17) 06/10/94
9496 1991(01) 08/05/91
9441 1988(07) 03/10/88
9444 1994 (07) 09/19/94
9441 1999(14) 04/12/95
9441 1986(49) 06/10/86
01/02/86
12/ 24/ OS
09/03/87
08/03/87
01/06/86
9503 52-lA
9503 5 1- lA
9527 1987(02)
9432 1987(08)
9432 1986(01)
XREF
XREF
/ /
/ /
REEF I ) / /
REEF / /
/ /
/ /

-------
07/06/98 SKYWORD Page No. 128
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES 9442.1909(04) 04/26/89
BAGNOUSE DUSTS USED AS. OR TO PRODUCE. AGGREGATE 9493 1991(03) 06/21/91
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUST 9434 1909(01) 03/17/09
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS GXYCHLORIDE ARE SOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION 9456 1994 (01) 12/16/94
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) 9441 1906(33) 04/23/06
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES REClAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER 9493 1905 103) 11/25/85
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS. RECYCLING A MIXTURE OF 9441 1986(34) 04/28/86
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION 9443 1986104) 01/22/86
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER 9493 1906101) 01/22/86
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED, NOT A WASTE 9441 1986(39) 05/12/86
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES 9443 1907(30) 11/30/87
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY ThEM 9441 1905(31) 10/03/05
EXPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE TO CENTRAL AMERICA 1990(01) 02/16/go
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OP CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING 9433 1907(10) 06/12/97
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAIARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE 9441 1906(83) 11/13/86
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PROOUCT 312, REGULATION OF 9494 1906(04) 04111186
IWSPECT1ON AUTHOR iTY WIDER SECTION 3007 OF RCRA 9504 1906(02) 04/17/86
LEAXS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS. MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO 9441 1906(07) 01/23/06
LETTER TO STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONERS SUBTITLE 0 STATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS 9172 00-02 02/22/00
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE 9441 1906 (43) 05/30/06
MERCURY TNERICMETERS. RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND BROKEN 9441 1906121) 04/02/ES
MERCURY, REFINING/REUSE OF SCRAP 9441 1906(06) 01/21/06
MICRO-CLEAR REGUI,ATORY STA’IIJS 9444 1990(02) 03/22/90
MIXTURE OF P003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND OELISTINO REQUIREMENTS 9441 1907(65) 06/17/07
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC 9441 1969 (301 11/20/05
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE 9443 1906(13) 05/27/06
OFF’SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL 9441 1906(19) 03/00/86
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1906(21) 03/13/06
RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE 9441 1905(33) 10/23/05
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES 9441.1905(19) 11/25 /ES
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES 9441 1906(22) 03/19/86
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U S EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY 9444 1908(09) 03/11/00
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES SHIPPED TO A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER FOR RECLAMATION 9497 1996(01) 06/19/96
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, CHEMICAL, RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR 9443 1907(01) 01/06/07
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENS 9441 1907(24) 04/15/07
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF 9441 1987(17) 03/31/a?
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER 9493 1905(02) 11/14/65
STATUS OF UNLISTED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS WHEN RECYCLED 9444 1993(01) 02/21/93
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE S 9502 1986(IS) 09/12/OS
Batteries
‘BATTERY REGENERATION 9441 19O5(30a) 09/01/05
‘EXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9456 1907(01) 00/01/07
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON THE UNIVERSAL WASTE REGUI,ATIONS 1996(02) 05/01 196
‘LEAD-ACID BATTERIES A1ID UNIVERSAL WASTE 9993 1995(01) 12/01/95
•REGENERATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9497 1994(01) 11/01/94
‘REGULATION OP NICKEL/CADMIUM BATTERIES AS SCRAP METAL WHEN RECYCLED 9441 1990(13d) 05/01/90
‘SPENT LEAD ACID BATTERIES 9497 1909 (01) 01/01/09
‘SPENT LEAD-ACID EATTERIES AND COUN’IING REQUIREMENTS 9497 1999 (01) 06/01/95
AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON) BATTERIES AND RCRA REQUIREMENTS 9451 1907(03) 07/30/07
ATOll BATTERIES, GENERATOR DEFINITION FOB I9EE(01) 02/25160
BATTERIES. SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS WETALS 9441 1905(44) 12/10/05
BATTERIES. WASTE ELECTROLYTE FROM RECHARGEABLE NICESL-CAWIIIJM 9441 1989(13) 05/IS/OS
BATTERY RECONDITIONING 9441 1906(96) 07/20/06
BATTERY RECYCL iNG AND EXPORT 9497 1907(01) 02/12/07
COLLECTION AND RECYCLING OF HOUSEHOLD BATTERIES 9993 1997(05) 09/16/97
DO MERCURY BATTERIES RECOVERED FROM THE WASTE NEAR AID TO NAVIGATION (ATOll) STRUCTURES SATISFY THE DEFINITION OF DEBRIS 9551.1997 (031 04/03/97

-------
REWORD INDW( Page HO. 129
GENERATCON OP AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATUN BATTERIES) 9461 1907(03) 07/30/el
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OP C RON-ZINC BATTERIES 9441 1944 (07) 04/19/04
LITHIUM BATTERIES 9443 3987(02) 01/14/01
MANAGEMENT OP LEAD-ACID BATTERIES TEAT ARE RECYCLED 9497 1993 (DI) 12/23/91
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9443 1916(18 1 09/04/06
NICKEL-CADMIUM SE ntRIES RE WHO 9497 1991 (021 05/30/91
N1CKLE/CAIII4IUM BATTERIES, REGULATORY STATUS 9441 1990(13) 05/23/90
REACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OP DISCHARGED (4/502 BATTERIES 9 1987 (05) 03/10/03
RECYCLES PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES PROM DEPENSE DEPT SUPPLIES 9441 1996(953 11/ 19186
RECYCLING OP LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9497 19091031 11/17/89
REGENERATION OP USED BATTERIES E IDIPTRD FRCI4 REGULATION 9441 1916(513 O7/02/B
EEGULATURY STATUE OP BATTERIES 9441.1193(24) 12/22/93
BEGULATORY STATUS OP BATTERY CARCASSES 9441 1993123) 11/10/91
REGULATORY STATUS OP MERCURY BATTERIES AS HAZARDOUS DEBRIS 1443 1994(02) 02/04/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF PLASTIC CHIPS PROM RECLAMATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES 9441 1993(13) 08/04/13
REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES SHIPPED TO A SECGNDART LEAD SMELTER POR RECLAMATION 9497 1996(01) 06/19/96
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED NICREL-CADMIUM BATTERIES 9441 1993(20 1 10/22/91
REPROCESS iNG OF BATTERIES 9 19R7(02 ) 02/19/81
REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING 9497 1906)01) 02/06/06
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE 0ATTERIEE THAT ARE RECYCLED 9441 1906)79) 10/20/06
SPECIAL MATERIALE DIEPOSEG OP IN LANDFILLS. BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACES 94B7 1986(13) 12/31/06
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BRING RECIAII4EI3 9’-fl 1967(03) 04/17/81
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES MAAGEMENT 1989(02) 10/19/89
THE LASELIBG REGUIREMENTS ORDER 40 CPA PART 27) FOB HAZARDOUS WASTE BATTERIES 1997 (04) 05/11/97
WASTE BATTERIES AND CELLS 9443 1903(05) 07/27/83
By-Pr odu ct
•C1J.RIPICATIOI( OP BY-PRODUCT VERSUS SCRAP METAL 9441 3990(096) 03/01/90
ERASE DROSE EEI QIINGS, SEPARATION OP METALE AND OXIDES. ST-PRODUCT 9441 1985(21) 06/06/85
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANS 9441 1906 (37) 05/01/06
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL, DEFINITION OF 9432 1906(10) 04/12/06
CI,ARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER USED FIXES IS A BY-PRODUCT MO (lot SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE WREN BRING RECLAIMED 9441 1995(27) 00/16/95
CLARIFICATION OP RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1994(13) 05/19/94
CLARIFICATION ON MANIFEST DOCIJMEPT NUMBER, P003. P015. D IOI, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING, MO IRKATHENT STANDARDS FOR CPC 9441 1994(26) 09/20/94
COPPER-BEARING SECONDARY MATERIALS AS PREDETOCK 9441 1988(00) 03/22/80
DISTILLATION OR PRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CNLOROBENZEHE 9441 1908(11) 04/21/08
DROSS PEON ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OP CEMENT 9441 1909(01) 02/07 109
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS IHDUS111Y, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION 9441 1909)11) 04/01/89
HAZARDOUS WASTE DSTERM IIOATION OP ‘NICKEL MATTE’ BY-PRODUCT 9441 1994(12) 12/13194
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS El’-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1989(14) 04/02/09
ON-SITE INCINERATION OP A WASTE ‘flOAT IS EOfl( A BT-PROIUCT MATERIAL MO HAZARDOUS 9431 19*6134) 09/06/96
REGULATORY STATUS OP COAL TAR DISTILLATES 9448 1992121) 07/09/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP DISULFIDE OIL WHICH IS BURNED IN A SULFURIC ACID FURNACE 9441 1993(10) 06/02/93
REGULATORY STATUS OP DRIP GAS GENERATED AW(C NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES 9444 1993)03) 09/09/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF MAEARDUUS WASTE FUELS CONTAINING RECOVERED LIGHT NYDROCARBON 9442 1993(03) 11/04/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS 9441 1992(27) 00/36/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS EAREX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES 9432 1593(01) 03105/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOWER SEIMMINGS 9441 1992(20) 08/20/fl
SOWER DROSS PROM EXIMNING MOLTER SOLDER BATHS - REGULATORY STATUS 9441 1991(031 03/19/91
SOWER SEI(O4INGS REGULATORY INTERPRETATION 9441 1991(10) 06/21/91
WE REGULATORY STATUS OP A DISTILLATE MATERIAL KNOWN AS 9,8-BID’ TNAT 15 DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM MO COAL TAR NAPI(TNA FEEDSTOCRS 9441.1995 102) B1/31/95
THERMAL OXIDIEHA AND OIYDROOSCHLOEINATION PROCESS BY-PRODUCT E-WAITES 9444 1587 (44( 10/16/97
Def in it ion
•BDAT FOR WA5TEWATER 9432 1906116) 12/01/06
•DEPINITION OP SOLID WASTE 9441 1907140) 05/11/87
‘ELECTROPLATING AND RLRCTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS 9432 1989101) 00/11/09

-------
07/06/98 1(t3’WORD INDEX Page No *30
‘HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1900(30) 06/01/00
•SEINNER LIST 9445 3965(06) 0 0/01/85
•SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OP 9441 1906(59) 06/01/86
‘SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE. DEFINED FOR SPENT SULPURXC ACID 9441 1906(17) 01/01(06
•TANII WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS 9432 1988103) 03/01/00
‘USED OIL, DEFINITION OF 9431 1988)011 1 )/Os/OS
‘WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION 9432 1980(051 10/01/08
APPLICABiLITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS. TO THE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER 9441 1994430) 11/23/94
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PNOTOGRAPNIC FIXER SOLUTIONS 9406 1994 (Il) 02/28/94
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1987(19) 09/14/87
BAGNOUSE FLUE DUST AND ZINC OXIDE SLUDGE USED IN ZINC CREMICALS PRODUCTION 9441 1905(06) 02/13/05
BATCN, DEFINITION OF 9432 1909(05) 12105/69
ROILRRS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 9432 1986103) 01/09/96
CLARIFICATION OF NOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE RE lIC BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1994(181 01/11/94
CLARIFICATION ON RCRA AND TSCA JURISDICTION OVER INFECTIOUS AND/DR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED WASTE 9443 1995(06) 02/21/95
CLARIF iCATION IS A FACILITY THAT HAS A ‘PRIMARY PURPOSE’ OF BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO RCRA REGULATIONS’ 9490 1994 (07) 07/21/94
COLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTTERY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS 9441 1998417) 05/38/80
DETERMINATION ON NNETNSR A GENERATOR’S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAZARDOUS 9441 1995(23) 06/22/95
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS. DEFINITION 9432 1986)05) 02/05/86
NEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR 9432 3985(00) 11/2 1/OS
HOLDING, TEMPORARY. PERIOD, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS) 9432 1906112) 37/28/86
IGNITABLE SOLID DEFINITION APPLIED TO TITANIUM SWARF 1993 (Ii i 01/10/93
INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION ILUERIZOL( 9432 198S(IDI 12/3D/OS
INTERPRETATION OP INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID HA sTE 9441 1995105) 02/17/95
IS SCRUBBER WASTE PROM A SCRURRER IN A CLOSED-LOOp FLUE GAS DSSULFIJRIZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE’ 9441 1995 (14) 14/12/55
LEAD SNEILDING FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE IS A RCRA SOLID WASTE 9444 1991(02) 04/30/91
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF R432 1987 (ito ) 11/04/07
MATERIALS (1580 IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 1993 (14) 10/11/91
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT 9493 1991 l OS) 10/11/91
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS 9441 1917146) 06/37/07
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9412 1906(00) 04/10/86
PROCESSING LEAD ARATENENT DEBRIS TO MEET NAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLRR’S SPECIFICATIONS IS NOT ‘TREATMENT’ AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260 II 9432 1994(03) 10/07/94
RECYCLING EXCLUSION OF WASTES 9441 1990(061 03/19/90
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT 09 LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS 1993 (04) 11/17/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION FLOAT STORAGE TANK USED TO FEED MATERIAL INTO A PETROLEUM CORER 9441 1993(21) 11/01/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST 9441 1995103) 02/06/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA 9442 1994(061 07/29/94
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREAThENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWW EXEMPTION 9432 1906(01) 01/06/06
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UIIIT FOR T i lE PURPOSE 09 CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004(u), DEFINITION OF 9502 00-6 01/03/07
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCIS IULATED SPECULATIVELY 9441 1900(19 1 05/26/8 )
STILL EO’rCQM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY 9432 1908101) 02/11/00
THREE AI(D FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF 9412 1907(02) 04/02/07
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATO4ENI’ EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGNOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1906(151 12/22/86
TOTALLY ENCLOSED T9EATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A EAGNOUSE SYSTEM 9432 1967(01) 03/17/07
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMEfl EXEMPTION FDR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9432 DO-I 02/11/06
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(01 (2) OF RCRA 9400 19871021 30/29/87
VARIANCES FROM CLASRIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTR UNDER 4D CPR 260 11(b ) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS 9433 1994(02) 11/15/94
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS 9441 1946(69) 09/12/06
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED DR USED AS FERTiLIZER 9441 1907(61 ) 08/12/87
Diocorded Materials
‘DEFINITION OF COI4NERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT FOR SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION VS HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATIDN 9441 1996(07) 08/01/96
‘ISOMERS OF F’ AND U-LISTED WASTES 9444 1995(02) 09/03/95
ACCIJHULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS DISPOSED OF 9441 1905125) 07/01/85
APPLICABILITY TO THE MIXING OF PAINT AIYD COATINGS THAT RAVE SEPARATED IN THE COIITAINER AND EMPTY PAINT CANS 9441 1991103) 04/11/97
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (GD PR 7824, FEBRUARY 9, 19951 AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY 9441 1995(20) 08/24/95
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AIOIUNOTION OF 4 50 CALIBER 9443 2994(06) 11/03/94

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD 3) 10HZ
Page Ho 131
Household Waetes
‘HOTEl, DRY CLEANING WASTE AND TEE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSIONS
‘HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
‘HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EXCLUSION GENERATED BY COHTRACTORS
‘MEDICAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE
‘RESTAURANT WASTE MID THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION
‘WASTE CLASSIFICATION
‘WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSiON TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL
APPLICABILITY TO THE MIXING OF PAINT AND COATINGS TEAT HAVE SEPARATED IN THE CONTAINER AND EMPTY PAINT CANS
CALIFORNIA LIST NOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
CHEMICAL WEAPON AGENT REALEASE
DO RCRA REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE HANDLING. SHIPMENT AND DIEPOEAL OF HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS’
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MU1IICI PAL SPONSORS OF
EDUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
EDUSENOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OP CAREON-ZINC BATTERIES
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS
MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN QUANTITIES LESS THAN 100 KG AND THOSE THAT ARE THROWN AWAY WITH ORDINARY GARBAGE
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OP USED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
RESIDUES PROM U S NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
STATUS OF WASTES GENERATED FROM ABATEMENT OP LEAD- BASED PAINT
USED CRANECASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO- IT-YOURSELFERS
9441
9444
9SS1
9441
9441
9443
9441
9441
9432
9441
9441
9441
9441
1999129) 08/01/95
1994109) 09/21/94
1990)14 ) 12/11/90
1985(44) 12/18/85
1994 126) 09/2B/94
1997 (11) 05/19/97
1999(15) 04/OS/89
1956(76) 10/GE /EG
1989 103) 06/16 189
1993(17) 09/20/93
1994(10) 05/09/94
1993 (15) 09/14/93
1996 (10) 11/07/96
FORMALDEHYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS
IRON AND STEEL ELAGS. REGULATORY STATUS
IS SCRUBEER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-Loop PLUE GAS DESULFUEISATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE?
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OP THE STATUS OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING WASTES
SALE AND SCRAPPING OP DOT’S MARITIME OSSOLETE VESSELS PROM THE NATIONAL DEPENSE RESERVE FLEET
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OP PESTICIDE APPLICATION
SPENT CARBON REGULATION
THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODECNLORINnIOIJ PROCESS BY - PRODUCT E-WASTES
9441 1966(38) 05/01/86
9571 1990(04) 05/30/90
9441 1995(14) 04/12/95
9441 1991(06) 07/24/97
9441 1994 121) OB/05/94
9444 1986(20) 09/29/B6
9441 1987(37) 05/18/B ?
9444 1987(44) 10/ 16/B7
9441 1995(13)
9441 198B (30)
9441 1990(09)
9441 1989(24)
9441 1995 (19)
9441 1987(99)
9441 1997 (31)
9441 1995(08)
9441 1997(03)
9554 1999(04)
9441 1990(12)
9141 1995(07)
9441 1986(321
9441 1956(09 )
9574 1991 (Dl)
9441 1984(071
9441 1967(281
9451 1996(07)
9451 1996(05)
9443 1986(18)
9442 1993 (02)
9441 1907(16)
9443 1994 (03)
944) 1987(64)
03/01/95
06/01/BE
03/01/90
OB/01/B9
05/01/95
12 /01/8 7
04 /01/67
03 /07/95
04/11/97
11/2 B/ S B
0S/09/90
02/29/95
04 /21/86
01/28/86
05/3 0/9 1
04/19/84
11/20/87
07/12/96
05/01/96
09/04/86
10/07/93
03/17/87
05/24/94
08/13/87
Regulated WeeteB
‘9CR WASTES AR HAZARDOUS WASTES
‘SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
APPLiCABILITY OP MIHINC WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTED LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS
CLARIFiCATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
DREDGE SEDIMENTS
STORAGE PACILITIES, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
Scrap Metal
‘PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION
APPLICABILiTY OF P006 NJLEARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATiON PROCESS FOR ELECTROLESS NICKEL PLATING SPENT SOLUTIONS
ASBESYOS/LEAD/SOIL/DSERIS AS INORGANIC SOLID DERRIS
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
CLAN I FICATION ON - MANIFEST DOCUMENT NIR(EER, F003 • FOGS • DCCI, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING, AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
DEFINITION OP TEE CHARACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY AS IT PERTAINS TO AEROSOL CANS
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
NAEARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS PROM DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
REGULATORY DETSRJII NATION OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO ENOWN AS ‘POT DUMPS’
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS (GSA) CANISTERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS
REGULATORY STATUS OF CHOPLINE RESIDUE
9441 1996(05) 09/01/96
9444 1986(14) 06/01/BE
9441 1994(11) 05/11/94
9571 1993(02) 11/05/93
9443 1989(OB) OB/1l/89
8432 1983(02) 11/29/83

-------
07/06/98 KBVWORD INDEX Page No. 132
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN )4RECURY WIDER ECRA 9442.1994106) 07/29/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS 9441.1992)27) 08/20(92
REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT fl CONDUCTOR DM1145 FROM PNOU OpflplG IQO)INES 9441 1992)39) 11/10/92
REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT SOLDER BATHS. ALSO KNOWN AS POT DUMPS’ 9441 1993)16) 09124191
REGULATORY STATUS OP USED RESIDRNTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS 9442 1993 102) 10/07/91
SALE AND SCRAPPING OP DOT’S MARITIME OBSOLETE VESSELS PROM THE NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET 9441.1994 121 1 08/05/94
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLE) 9441 1986 (791 10/20/86
TEE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN TIlE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID A(TI’O)4OTIVE BAtTERIES 9441 1999 (211 09/t4/95
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SEIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF 9441.1986114) 02/25/86
tOTALLY ENCLOSED TREA T MENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9432.00-1 02/11/86
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION 9441 1990130) 10/20/SO
USED DI I. FILTERS, REGULATORY DETER)4INATICN 9442.1990(05) 10/30/99
Secondary MAIBT1R1R
‘CLOSED LOOP RECYCLING 9471 1988)06) 12/01/88
‘PURPOSE AND APPLICAAILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCW)ULATION PROVISION 9441 1995 (29) 08/01/95
‘SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECT iVE SUBSTIflTIES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS 9441.1992 (11) 05/01/92
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS DISPOSED OF 9441.1985(251 07/01/85
ARE RECOVERED SOLVENTS STILL EXEMPT IF LESS THAN 100% OF THE RECOVERED PRODUCT IS RETURNED TO TIlE ORIGINAL PROCESS 9441 1997105) 06/03/91
ERIQUEI1INO OF FLUE DUST IEO6 I) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION 9441 1987)58) 07/31/87
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS 111EV APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1994113) D5/19/94
CLARIFICATION ON NOW REUSE OF ‘WASTE RESINS’ AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA 9441 1994)19) 07/11/94
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT 9441.1994)25) 09/28/94
CLARIFICATION ON MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER. P003. P005. 0001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING. AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CRC 9441 1994)26) 09/28/94
COPPER-BEARII4O SECONDARY MATERIALS AS FREOSIUCK 9441 1988 (08) 03/22/68
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLW0I BOTTOMS FROM TIlE PRODUCTION OP CRLOEDDENEENE 9441 1988(11) 04/21/80
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9498 1994 (06) 07/20/94
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO EXPORTED WASTES 9551.1991 (07) 04/23/91
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 9494.1985(01) 10/01/eS
METAL GALVANIEINO PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PROOUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS 9441 1989(14) 04/02/89
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPI.AT ING SLUDGES (P004) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE 9441 1989(19) 04/26/89
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TEChNOLOGIES (M W $4411994123) 08/19/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST THAT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER EINC METAL 9441.1994 (31) 12/20/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS CONTAINING RECOVERED L1GNT HYDROCARBON 9442.1993)03) 11/04/fl
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SAREX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES 9432 1993)01) 03/05/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PNOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES 9441 1992)39) 11/10/91
RETURNED PHARMACEUTICAL PROD IJCTS 9455.1991)02) 05/16/91
SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED 10 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY 9441 1989(29) 06/15/89
SECONDARY MATES1ALS RECYCLED IN PHOSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS 9571 1990(05) 06/27/90
SECONDARY MATERIALS R ULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID 9441 1988(23) 06/06/88
SPENT FOUNDRY SAI)DS USED AS HOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS 9441 1995(221 06/19/95
USE OF INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAEARDOUS WASTES AS FEEDSTOCE FOR A CATALYTIC RETRACTION PROCESSING ICEP) UNIT 9432 1998(01) 04/12/90
USE OF WASTE LEATHER TRIPEIINGS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ABSORBED MATERIALS 9441 199 6(04) 06 /11/96
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 160 31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS 9433 1994(02) 11/15/94
Spent Malerials
‘ONTM4INATED SOLDER AS SPENT MATERIAL 9441 1987(65) 05/01187
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION 9441 1990(13c) 05/01/98
‘LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL WASTE 9593.1995(011 12/01/95
‘SPENT LRAD-ACID BATTERIES AND COUNTING REQUIREMENTS 9497.1995(01) 06/01/95
‘SPENT SOLVENTS PROM VARNISH STRIPPING 9441 1986)57) 05/01/86
‘WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS 9441 1986)96) 12/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTiTLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS 9496 1994)01) 02/28/94
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9442 1986(03) 04/02/86
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES 9441 1946126) 04/02/86
CNLOROFLUORGCARBON RECYCLING 9441 1988412) 01/21/68
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER USED FIXER IS A ‘BY-PRODUCT’ AND NOT SUBJECT TO TUE DEFINITION OF SDLID WASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED 9441 1995)27) 09/16/95

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 133
CLARIFICATION OP ECRA REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO THE USE OF PERCNLOROETHYLENE IN DRY-CLEANING PROCESS 9441 1994115) 06/10/94
CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF ‘SPENT MATERIAL’ AS IT APPLIES ‘TO A MERCURiC CHLORIDE CATALYST 9441 1994 (06) 03/24/94
CLARIFICATION OF WHEN A SECONDARY MATERIAL MEETS ‘ nIB DEFINITION OF ‘SPENT MATERIAL’ 9441 1994 )07) 03/24/94
CLARIFICiTIOH ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT 9441 1994 (29) 09/28/94
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR’S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NOHHAZARDOUS 9441 1995 (23) 06/22/95
EPA’S ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER AN UNUSED CHEMICAL AND THE RESULTING SPENT MATERIAl, ARE HAZARDOUS WASTE AND/OR MIXED WASTE 9442 1996(01) 03/39/96
EPA’S NON-OBJECTiON TO IMPORTS OF COBALT OXIDE-MOLYBDIC OXIDE EPENT CATALYSTS INTO THE U S FOR RECOVERY 9496 1996(01) 02/15/96
ETONANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS 9441 19R6 (82) 11/08/86
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 9441.1994(08) 03/30/96
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM 9441 1988(90) 12/07/RB
INTERPRETATION ON REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED 9444 1994(03) 03/31/94
IS THE CHEMICAL POTASSIUM HRXACYAIIOCOEALT (11)-FERRATE (II), USED AT A DOE NUCLEAR PLANT, CONSIDERED A M IEED WASTE’ WiDER RCRA7 9441 1995(30) 09/13 195
NICELE/CADMIUN BATTERIES. REGULATORY STATUS 9441 1990(13) 05/23/90
PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER RECYCLING 9496 1990(01) 07/16/90
PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA FROM AIR STRIPPING TVWRR TREATING CONTAMINATED DROUHDWATER 9441 19R9(17) 04/14/99
POSITION PAPER ON SPENT ARSORRENT MATERiALS 9441 1991(09) 06/21/91
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST 944 1 1999(03) 02/06/99
REGULATORY STATUS OF CHOPLIHE RESIDUE 9441 1996110) 11/07/96
REGULATORY STATUS OF HIGH PURITY CHDIICALS THAT ARE INITIALLY USED BY CUSTOMERS AND THEN SOLO TO OTHER BUSINESSES FOR FURTHER USE 9441 1994 (24) 08/30/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF METAL CASINGS CONTAINING SPENT POWDERED METALLIC OXIDE CATALYST 9443 1994 (01) 01/03/94
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER SCRAP 9441 1992(06) 03/26/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA 9441 1999(101 03/08/95
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT LEAD-ACID SATFERIES SNIPPED TO A SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER FOR RECLAMATION 9497 1996(011 06/19/96
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PNOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACNINES 9441 1992(391 11/10192
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES 9441 1993(201 10/32/93
REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF COPPER ETCHA IITS 9442 1996(03) 10/24/96
SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY 9441 1989(29) 16/19/89
SOLDER DROSS GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS 9441 1991(18) 12/09/91
SPENT ACIDS AS WATER CONDITIONER 9441 1987(73) 08/31/97
SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS 9441 1999 (22) 06/19/99
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES IAGE!jEN’r 9497 1989(02) 10/19/89
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE 944) 1986(61) 08/18/06
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES 9441 1992(02) 01/19/92
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES 944 ! 1992(31) 09/24/92
USED EEFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261 2 9441 1990(26) 10/16/90
USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION 9441 1986(42) 05/20/96
USED X-RAY FILMS 9443 1986(12) 09/23/Es
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDEE 40 CFE 260 31(b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS 1994 C02 1 11/19/94
Subtitle D
‘SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES 9581 19ORCOI) 11/01/88
SUST(TLE D SURVEY 9573 1987 101) 03/01/07
APPLICASILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL - 9441 1995(06) 03/07/99
INSPECTION AITIHOEITY WIDER SECTION 3007 OF RCRA 9904 1986(02) 04/07/06
LETTER TO STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONERS SUBTITLE D STATS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT tas 9972 00-02 02/22/RB
MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS 9451 199S 07) 07/12/96
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C 9441 19RE(55) 07/16/06
ECU SUBTITLE C REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS COLLECTING CESOG WASTE 9574 00-02 07/22/92
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT (SW)4Ue)
(See Corrective Action) SERF / /
SOLIDIFICATION
(See Treatment)
KEEP / /

-------
07/06/98 XEYNORD IN fl Page No. 134
SOLVENTS
(See also Listed Hazardous Wasta, Wastevater, Electroplating. Reclaeation. Recovery under Reclamation. Recycle) XREF / I
•BDAT FOR WASTEWATER 9432 1986(16) 12/01/86
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION 9441.1985(12) 04/01/85
‘LAND DISPOSAL RAN OP SOLVENTS 9551.l956(03) 02/01 ,86
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - 1% NATIONAL VARIANCE (SOLVENTS) 9551 1987(24) 11/01/87
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN WASTES 9553 1986(01) 02/01/88
‘METHYL CIILOROFORI4 9444 1984(17) 00/01/84
‘PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS 9441 1986 (45) 05/01/86
‘SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FOR DEGREAS IP JG 9441 1987( 19) 03/01/87
‘SOLVENT DRIPPINGS P 1084 DEGREASING OPERATIONS 9443 1987)08) 04/01/87
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE. THE 9444 198S( lSa) 07/01/85
‘SOLVENTS USED IN CLEANING EXTRACTION. RENEFICIATION . AND PROCESSING MACHINERY 9441 1984 (33) 11/01/84
‘VARIANCES TO BAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS 9551 1986(22) 12/01/86
‘WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS 9441 1986(96) 12/01/86
‘WASTEWATER TREAI7IENT SLUDGE FROM ChEMICAL ETCHING flfl 1984(02) 03/01/84
‘WASTEWATSR TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS 9453 1984(02) 05/01/84
ACETONE AND METHANOl. CONTAMINATED WASNWATERS 9444 1989(05) 07/21/89
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION 9444 1986(08) 09/02/86
CAUSTIC RINSING METAL PARTS 9444 1987(3)) 08/07/89
CLEAN SOLVENT FROM RECYCLED SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE - STILL BOTTOMS 9441 1987(26) 04/17/87
DELISTING OF WASTE GENERATED FROM ZINC PHOSPHATING ON CARBON STEEL 9441.1984 (24) 09/06/84
DRY CLEANING CARTRIDGE FILTERS. DISPOSAL OF 95S3 1986(03) 12/Il/aS
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACNLGRIDE. SAFE DISPOSAL OF 9451 1986(06) 12/15/86
DRYCLEANENG 1NDUSTRY WASTES 9444.1987107) 03/06/87
ELECTROCNEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE FOO6 LISTING 9444.1987103) 01/27/87
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 9442 1987(03) 07/28/87
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS NOT IN P017 -009 LISTINGS 9444 1986(07) 04/07/88
F SOLVENT WASTES 9444.1985(01 1 04/01/85
P003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS 9444.1987(30) 07/21/87
P005 LISTING FOR PYRIDIRE STILL BOTTOI4S 9444 1987(53) 12/15/87
FOOS AND P019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS 9444 1986 409) 05/02/86
FOES LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING 9444 1987 (091 03/26/87
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS 9444 1987(22) 06/24/87
FILTER CASE WASTE CONTAINiNG SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT 9444 1987 1431 10/09/87
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312 REGULATION OF 9494 1986(041 04/11/86
IIO4ERSION PLATING WASTEWATERS-BRONEE PLATING 9442 1986(05) 10/03188
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY 9554 1987(02) 02/03/87
MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN Th8 P006 LISTING. NON-INCLUSION OF 9444 1986(13) 06/24/86
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES 9444 1988(02) 01/ 20 /88
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT 9441 1987(28) 04/30/87
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 9441 1986(30) 04/16/86
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER GENERATOR DETERMINATION 9432 1986)13) 08/06/86
PAINT FIL1SRS USED 9444 1988(13) 07/28/88
PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AIR FILTERS 9442 1990(011 05/03/90
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1987)17) 05/20/87
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1986(47) 06/02/86
PAINTS CONTAINING SDLVENT5 9444 1988)11) OS/OS/ED
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REGUIRD4ENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS 9502 1986(11) 06/16/86
PEE-COAT WASTE COIFTAINING 2-ETNOXYETIIANOL (EXTRUDING PROCESS WASTE) 9444 1986(15) 08/04/86
PROCESS WASTES CONTA1N)NO INKS, PAINTS. AI1D ADHESIVES 9441.1987 (09) 02/19/87
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT 9444.1987 449) 10/26/87
RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE 9441 1985(33) 10/23/85
RECYCLING NICEEL. COPPER AND CNROEIIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGIS 9441 1988(09) 04/04/88
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES )F0061 FOR CERENT/AGGREGATE )4ANUFACTURE 9441 1989(19) 04/24/89
REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES 9444 1993(03) 09/09/93

-------
07/06/99
EEYWORD INDEX
Page 110 135
RSSIDUALS PROM TRRA’II4ENT OF RESTRICTED WASTES NOT COVERED BY LESS-THAN- IS SOLVENT EXTENSION
R HiSS WATERS CONTAINING ICE SOLVENT
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM TIlE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPRATING PROCESS
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAl. RESTRICTIONS
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER Alit SPILL RESI O l IN
SOLVENT LISTINGS. SCOPE OF
SOLVENT-REARING N8ISTRWATSR. SLUDGE. AND BRINE TREATED AND STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS
SOLVENTS USED AS COOLANTS AND APPLICABILITY OP SOLVENT LISTINGS
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS
SOLVENTS (SEED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR C0000ERCIAL CND4ICAL PRODUCT
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS. BLENDING OP RECLAIMED IIYLENE
SPENT CYANiDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE (NALCAST 6QtS/WATERØ(A lIl
STILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
STILL SOtI FROM LISTED SOLVENT REOJiMATION
SUEST 1IUTIOR OF EXTRACTION SOLVENTS FOR METMYLENE CR1.ORIDE
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES. OILS AND SOLVENT-EASED PRODUCTS
TCLP iN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAEARDGUE WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
TETRACNLOROETHYLENE CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCIILORINATED SIPNENYLS I PCBsI
THERMAL TREATHit4T UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF TI lE P005 LISTING
TOLUENE-CO14TAINING PAINT PRODUCTS FROM WOOD PIECES, REGULATORY STATUS
TOLUENE-LAOEN FILTER RESIDUE GENERATED FROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS
VOLATI LI EATION OP SOLVENTS COUNTED AS SOLVENTS USED
WASTE FROM CNEMICAL ETCNINO USING CYANIDE
WASTE FROM ELECTROLESS PLAT1NG PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED FOBS LISTING
WASTE (NM AND SOLVDTT METURBS GENENATED FROM PRINTING FACILiTIES
WASTE LISTINGS FOGS AND 11052, SCOPE OP
WASTES FROM BRIGMT DIPPING UNDER TIlE REINTERPRETED PROS LISTING
WASTES FROM EINC PLATING I SEOREOATED SAS 15 ) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM F lOG
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METNYLERE CHLORIDE 1 0 RECOVER ALEALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER
WASTEWATER TREATHSNT SLUDOES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
WASTEWATSR TREAI1OENT SYSTERI. SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN
WATER WALL SPRAY ROOm WASTER AND THE SOLVENT LISTINGS
9553 1957(071
9441 1901(591
9444 1985 (113
9444 1987119)
9444 1907(111
9444 1996(26)
9553 1957(01)
9444 1999(06)
9444 1997(92)
9444 1955(21)
9441 1996 (92)
9441 1987(24)
9441 1969(34 )
9444 1995( 151
9444 1997 (391
9444 2991(05)
9441 )SSS(2S1
9442 19911141
9443 1997(291
9444 1999(101
9499 1901(011
9444 1997(151
9443 199R(01)
9444 1995109)
9441 1991(0 11
9444 1987(16)
9444 1997(51 )
9443 1904(001
9444 1996(32)
9444 1947(26)
9444 1987(14)
9441 1986(52)
9444 1969106)
9441 1985(41)
9444 19 17(05)
04/27/87
08/07/87
03/22/ER
05 /30/0 7
04/14/97
11/0 7/96
01/12/97
03 /31/89
01/27/87
12/05/65
12/OS /89
04/35 /87
0 1/ OR/BR
06/24/ES
09/01/97
01/02/67
OS/OP/SO
10/29/91
11/16/E l
05/22/99
05/19 /99
09/17/87
0 1/ 04/ IS
05/03/85
05/10/91
05/20/81
12/04/01
11/23/84
12/12/86
01/13/81
05/06/37
07/02/96
06/at/R e
12/ 17/ OS
02/28/91
Rege end W Ipere
DISPOSAL OP RAGS TO WIPE CRUDE OIL
DISPOSAL OR RECLAMATION CF RAGS
RAGS AltO SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSDRSIEQ VOLATILES MID F-WASTES. HANDLING
RECYCLABLE CLOTN WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP KAIAEDOUS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAOERENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDSRARLS INDUSTR IAL RAGS AND WIPERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED INDUSTRIAL WIPERS AND SHOP TOWELS
SCRAP DENP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINiNG DRIP, DISPOSAL REOUIRIDIENTS FOR
M9E end Wipes
((OW DO IGNITABLE SOLIDS, INCLUDING SOLVENT CONTAMINATED RAGS OR TOWELS. FIT INTO TUE 0101 CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY
Spent So lvento
‘COMPARATIVE DEFINITIONS OF Fool AND FOO l
‘DEFINITION OF SPENT SOLVENT
‘GENERATION AND RECYCLING
‘LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DISPOSAL OP WASTES GRANTED A VARIANCE
‘METHANOL TREATMENT STANDARDS
•PERCNLOROSTEYLENE USED IN DRY CLEANING
SUALL QUANTITY DETERMINATION FOR SOLVENT RECLAIMER
SOLID WASTE VARIANCE FOR SPENT SOLVENT
9441 1999(231 05/31/99
9444 1999113) 30/20/99
9441 19891501 10/21/89
9441 1986(53 1 07/03/86
9441 1993(19) 09/27/93
9441 1994102) 02/14/94
9441 1985(23) 06/27/85
9443 1997(02) 05/22/97
9444 1991(03) 05/0 1/91
9444 1999 (02a) 03/01/89
9441 1987)20) 03 101/97
9551 1966)051 05/01/58
9554 1990)04) 03/01/90
9444 1992 104) 10/01/92
9441 1987)1 1) 02/01/67
9433 1995)03) 09/01/ES

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 136
‘SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE 9441 1987118) 03/01/97
•SOLVSNT MIXTURE RULE APPLiED TO SPILL OP TOLUENE/BENZENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE 9443 1985 (11) 11/01 ,85
‘SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 9444 1986(14) 06101/86
•SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS 944 1 1989(55) 10/01189
‘SPENT SOLVENT L iSTINGS 9444.1988(09) 04/01/88
‘SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES (P-WASTES) 9443.1986 (051 01/01/86
‘SPENT SOLVENTS FROM VARNISH E 9441 1986 (57) 05/01/86
SPENT SOLVENTS IN SCINTALLATION COCKTAILS 9444 19E9(02c) 03/01/89
‘TECHNICAL GRADE SOLVENT FORMULATIONS Nfl) ‘fl(E P003 LISTiNG 9444 1994(05) 05/01/94
hl,1-TRICNLOROETHANE CONTAINED IN A SAND-METAL-SOLVENT MIXTURE 9443 1999 1071 07/10/89
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS 9441 1986(541 07/15/96
APPLICABILITY OF EPA’S REGULATIONS ‘10 INDOOR PIPING AND PLOW EQUALIZATION TANKS USED TO CONVEY SOLVENTS TO EXTERIOR TANKS 9483.1997(02) 07/29/97
ARE RECOVERED SOLVENTS STILL EXEMPT IF LESS THAN 100% OP THE RECOVERED PRODUCT IS RETIJRNED TO THE ORIGINAL PROCESS 9441 1997 (051 06/03/97
SIP REGULATIONS EPPECTS ON INDUSTRLAL BOILER 9489 1991(031 09/23/91
CNLOROPLUOROCARSONS (CFCe) AS REPEIGERANTS . RECYCLING OP SP 9441 1989(401 08/02/89
CLARIPICATION ON THE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 9444 1985(081 OS/24/85
CLARIFICATION ON MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER, FOO l, P005, 0001, WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING, AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC 9441 1994(261 09/28194
CLASSIPICATION OP P003 WASTES 9444 1992(051 11/04/92
CLASSIFICATION OP SOLVENTS ADDED TO PAINTS OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS AS REGULATED SPENT SOLVENTS BASED ON THE SOLVENTE STUDY 9441 1996(131 12/24/96
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1988(331 07/27/98
IDENTIFICATION OP SPENT SOLVENT IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES 9441 1992(44 ) 12/22/92
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH KOBS AND P001-005 WASTES 9444 1987(431 09/15/87
INTERPRETATION OP THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER PEON THE INCINERATION OP CERTAIN SOLVENTS 9441 1994(161 06/10/94
iRON CAKE WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTiON OF METXYLCOPA 9443 1987(32) 12/16/87
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 9494 .1985 (01) 10/01/85
MIXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - Fbi-PODS, REGULATURT STATUS OF 9441 1994 106) 04/10/84
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS 9441 1986(21 ) 03/13/86
REGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS AND THE MIXTURE RULE 9441 1992(21) 07/16/92
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OP WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL 9441.1992(36) 10/28/91
REGULATORY STATUS OP RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS 9441 1992(11) 05/28/92
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE GENERATED BY MCLAUGHLIN GORNLEY KING (MOE) COMPANY IN MINNESOTA 9444.1992103 1 10/20 192
RESIDUALS MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH TRACE SOLVENTS 9444.1991(04) 08/30/91
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSiDERED NAEAROOUS 9441 1984)03) 02/16/84
SOLVENT AND C 94ERCIAj. CNEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE STh S 9444.1989(03) 06/28/89
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 1996(89) 12/02/96
SOLVENT STILL AS RECYCLING UNIT - REGULATORY STATUS OF 9441 1995(24) 06/27/89
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED NASTESTREAjjS PROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 9441.1999(491 12/06/88
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAP(S FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 9443.1999(111 12/06/88
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATEE FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE 9442.1997 (061 10/28/87
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES 9444 1988(03) 02/11/98
SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS & LEACNATE FROM SANITARY IJe TEAT RECEIVED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9444 1993(01) 06/10/93
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX 9443 1996(41) 05/20/96
STILL BOTEW( WASTE GENERATED ST A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY 9432 1999(011 02/11/88
STILL BOTIOMS GSNSRATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT E4E3 1999(04) 04/19/89
WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANE FOAM 9441 1992(24) 09/17/92
WASTE SOLVENT-BASED GLUE 9443 1989 (02) 04/12/89
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS 9442 1996 (07( 07/02/96
SPENT MATERIALS
(See Solid EaR le) EREF / /
SPENT SOLVENTS
(See SolVents) XREF / /

-------
07 /06 /9 6
KEYWORD INDEX
Page 110 137
SPI LLS
(See Contingency Plan) (See also corrective Action)
ABOVE-GROUND LAND WIPLACBCNT FACILITI ES N J LAM
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR NSWA PROVISIONS
CALlFORNIA AUTHORIZATION • EVALUATION OF THE WASTE EVALUATION TEST
CLOSURS AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
COAL ASN AS A SOLID WASTE
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
EFFECTIVE DA lES FOR CHARACTERISTIC I LISTED WASTES PER 03/19/07 CLEAN CLOSURE REGULATION
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITENIA
11106 WASTE AND ONSITI DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING mESS WASTES
PROCESS WASTE ORLISTED BY THE STATE DES IGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE
RCRA 3001(1) (2) (b) AND STATES • SXCLUS ION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS COWPONRMTE OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
RTATS AUTNOR IIAT ION TO REGULATE NAEARDOUE COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT
WASTEWATER TREA17IENT SLUDGES CONTAINING METHANOL
Authorized States
• FEDERAL AUTHORITY OVER AUTHDRIZED STATES
CARSON EXGENEAATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUE
CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS IN PHASE II AUTHOSZEED STATES
DELISTING or WASTE BY AUTHDRIIED STATES
DETERMINING WHET hER STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE REQ ARE BROADER OR MORE STE INGENT THAN l IfE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRA))
DRAFT STATE RCRA PERMITS, EPA REVIEW OP
EPA ENFORCEMENT DY RCRA-AUTHDR SEED STATS HAZARDOUS WASTE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FEDERAL DELISTING AND RCRA PERMITTING IN INTERIM AUTHORIZED STATES
INTERIM AUTHORIZATiON OF PROGRANS BASED ON EMERGENCY STATE REGULATIONS
EGOS WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
MIXED WASTES AT DOE FACILITIES. REGULATION OF
PAST 8 FINANCIAL RESPONSZEILITY INFO REQ FOR OWNERS/OQERATDRS IN STATES WITH ONLY PHASE I AUTHORIZATION
P10-02-s AND RSI NE JOINT PERNITTING IN PHASE I AUTNOASSED STATES
QUANTUM TEOC PLaSMA ARC UNIT - REGUlATORY CLASSIFICATION
RCEA PENN1T REAUTNOR1EATION ISSUES IN REGION III
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IV DISPUTE RESOLUTION
STATE CAPANILITY ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE
STATS PERMITTING DURING PHASE I INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE
TRANSFEE OF FEDERAL ECRA PERMITS TO AUTHORIZED STATES AND COMPLIANCE WITH 40 CFN 124 10 (e)
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER NSWA. MAISAGEMSNT OF
Capability Assessments
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND ECRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES
Changing Federal Eegulaticns
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OP PRRT 265 CLEAN CLOSURE W7TH PART 164 EEQUIRflIENTE
XREF
/ /
SEE
IEee System RemovaL 515 aciencyl SEEP
STATE AUTNDRI ZATIGN
1/
NEEF / I
9407 1986 (041 03/26/06
9481 1987(071 S7/31/87
9442 1980(031 15/0 2/88
9476 1987(081 12/17/87
9571 1990(021 84/09 /90
9502 1906(063 04115/06
9476 00-36 04/0k/SB
9541 1904(14) 01/03/06
9432 1987(09) 01/19/87
9S41 1986104) 03 /03/96
9541 1956(05) 10/31/86
9S41 1906(19) 10/14/86
9471 00-5 fl/ lIFE 7
9541 1986(20) 10/31/86
9592 1996(03) 02/36/96
9441 1989(52) 10/06/89
9541 1980101)
9400 1991104)
9541 1983(DE)
9512 1980104)
9541 1984)04)
9522 1984)04)
9541 1982)01)
9542 1982)02)
9542 1980)02)
9432 1907)09)
9503 1985)02)
9417 1982 (01)
9543 00-1
9188 1991(04)
9541 1905(01)
9502 1907(05)
5541 1981(01)
9543 1904 (01)
9942 1980(03)
9441 1991(023
9541 1984 (05)
9541 1985(05)
01/01/88
08/02/81
08/02/81
10/3 1/80
05/21/84
10/01/04
05/17/8 2
07/09/82
10/ 13/80
08/19/8 7
08/30/es
05/24/82
10/03/85
09/30/91
03/06/85
04/02/81
01/ 1418 1
12/27/84
10/17/80
02/12/91
06/13/84
0 5 /06/85
9512 1988 )01) 12/23/08
0476 00-Il 05/11/19

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page NO. 131
RADIOACTIVE WASTE EXEMPTION iN NORnI AND SOUTH CAROLINA 9543.1984 (09) 09/ 13/84
STATE PERMITTING DURING PEASE I INTERiM AUThORIZATION 9542 19 10(03 ) 10/ 17/80
Interim Autharitation
RCRA RSI 92 EXTENSION OP INTERIM AUTHORIZATiON HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAMS 9542 3999 (01) 01/ 11/65
Joint Permitting
PEDERAL PERMITS IN STATES WHICH RAVE RECEIVED FINAL AUIIIORIZATION 9541 1984 109) 04 104114
HSWA AUTHORIZATION ISSUES JOINT PERMITTING 9941 1985(09) 07/01/85
RCEA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III 9541 1985(01) 03 106115
RCRA PERMITS WITH NSWA CONDITIONS JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS 9502 1987106) 06/30/87
WASTE MINIMIZATION PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND oirrr PERMITTING 9560 1985101) op/al/IS
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER l E NA , MANAGEMENT OF 95 1 1.1995(09) 05/IS/IS
More Stringent/Broader in Scope
‘STATS PROGRAMS 9512.1996(G1) 09/01/66
AUTHORIZATION OP STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRiCTIONS PROG 9541 1996111) 06 124/96
DETERMINING WHETHER STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE REQ ARE EROADER OR MORE STRINGENT THAN TNE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRAM 9541 1984(04) 05/21/84
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. NEWLY REGULATED DUE ‘ro -Jt 9464 1991(01 1 03/08/91
Pre-HEWA Provia lons
INDUSTRIAL PUENACES EURNI1C HAZARDOUS WASTES AND TIlE RESIDUALS GENERATED ILOUISIARA RED) 9494 1987(021 04/15/97
State Lava
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION 9541 1987(101 12/01/87
DESIGNATED FACILITY UNDER INS TREATARILITY STUDY RECLUSION 9432 1991(01) 09/27/91
NSWA AUTHORIEATICN ISSUES JOINT PERMITTING 9S41 1985(091 07/01/89
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGUlaTION OF RAZLO&CTtYZ s IZED WASTES 9541 1 197(041 06/29/91
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR REGENERATION EXEMPTION 9497 1991(01 1 03/04/91
Stare Permita I
DRAFT STATE RCRA PERMITS, EPA REVIEW OP 9522 19941041 10/01194
INVOLVEMENT OF STATES WITHOUT PHASE It INTERIM AUTHORIZATION IN RCRA PERMITTING 9542 19911011 02/12/El
REQUIREMENT TEAT STRTEPER)41’flED HAEAADOUS WASTE FACILITIES HAVE INTERIM STAflIS 9542 1990(01) I0/03f00
STATE PERMITS ISSUED REPORE RECEIVING RCRA PHASE II AUTNOR1ZATIOII 9542 1991 (031 01/09/82
State Programs
‘DELISTING 8 ? STATES 9541,19E6 124) 10/01/86
‘SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES 9581 1988401) 11/01/9*
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND USED OIL RECYCLED THROUGH Sti lE OTHER MEANS THAN EURNING FOR ENERGY RECDVERY 9992 1996(07) 11/01/96
EXCLUSION OF WASTE GENERATED AT INDIVIDUAl. FACILITIES (DELISTINO) 9542 1992(01) 05/25/92
)ISWA EFFECT ON STATE CRUSTING DeCISIONS 9433 19E5(I2 0 5/ 16/IS
LETTER TO STATE ENVIROSIMENTAL COMMISSIONERS SIIDT1TLS D STATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS 9572 00-02 02/22/91
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY 82 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE 9541 00-6 07/30/87
STATE PROGRAM REVIS1OSI AUTHORIZATIONS PILOT DELEGATION TO THE REGIONS 9541 1991 (01) 03/11)91
TRANSFER OF IIOTIFICATION AND PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION TO STATES 9542 1941 (021 03/24/El
UWIVERSAL WASTE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 19911021 02/13191
State Regulations
•STATE AUTHORIZATION AND USED OIL RECYCLED THROUGH SOME OTHER MEANS THAN BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9592 1996101) 11/01/96
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS. TO TUE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER 9441 1994(30) 11/23/94
CONTAINED-Ill POLICY 9441 1993(04) 03/26/91
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OP NERVE AGENTS, NIGH PRIORiTY PERNITr1NG 9501 1989(01) 09/11/86
LEAD SNEILDING FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE 1S A RCRA SOLID WASTE 9444.1991 (02) 04/30/91
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 9472 1991(011 10/01/91
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE 9542 1986(04) 03/03/86
STATE REGULATION OF FEDERAL AGENCIZS FOR PURPOSE Of INTERIM AUTNGRTEATIGN 954? 19801051 1 1/ 14/80

-------
07106/9 6
KEYWORD RICER
Page ))o 139
ZEEF
9451 1967)04)
9523 6983)02)
9476 6986(02)
9551 6987)05)
9551 6997(02)
9453 1986(06)
9453 1991 106)
9463 1966(06)
9475 1999 (021
9551 6966(24)
9475 1997(01)
9461 1996(01)
9472 1991101)
9497 1996 )04)
9453 1962)011
9441 1985)25)
9494 1966(05 )
9492 1994(011
9441 6995(091
9492 1995(011
9441 1994)221
9476 00-12
9492 2995(01!
9463 1966(10 !
9493 196(1011
9441 1965(311
9441 1993(13]
/-
09/01/97
0 2 /0 1 193
09/01 196
02/01 1(1
01/01/57
11/01/96
12 101/fl
10/01/96
10/01/65
12/01/66
04/01/87
06/01/96
07/01/93
03/26/66
09/31/92
07/01/95
04/11/ 96
09/02/94
03/09/95
06/30/95
09/11/D4
02/02/69
61/26/95
66 /03 169
01/22/96
10 /03 /65
03/04/97
EREP
XRSF
REEF
REEF
/ /
1/
/ 1
/ 1
STAIR LAWS
ISea State Authoritatson)
STATS PERMITS
See State Authorizatton)
STATS PRDOEAI4S
(Sea State Authorization)
STATE REGULATIONS
(See State AuthorIzation)
STAIVIURY AUTHOR IT?
CLARIFICATION ON RCRA AND TSCA JURISDICTION OVER INFECTIOUS AND/OR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED WASTE
REGULATION OF I(AZARDOUS COMPONENTS OP RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
STEEL FOUNDRIES
See Listed Hazardous Waste)
STORAGE
(See also Containers. Hazardous Waste FUela , tank System. Peratit Conditions)
•100- 1000 K g /K aHn) GENERATORS
•CERfl FICATIDN FOR CDHTAIHn STORAGE
•EAZAKDO1JS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
‘LAND D9S AL RESTRICT IONS - STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
• LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS STORAGE PROHIBITION Aim DECHARACTER tEED WASTES
PROI9I0ITI0N ON STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
•SATEI,LIT5 ACCUM uLATION
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VAEIAJICES FOR TANKS
SQG 100- 1Q00 Kg/MOWn) OE1IEEATOES, AND THE I4ANIPEST
‘STORAGE OF RESTRiCTED WASTES
‘STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING
TANX STORAGE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES
•WAST6 ANALYSIS FOR SIMPLE STORAGE AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
ABOVE-GROUND LAND UNPLACg4EWT FACILITIES. N ‘3 LAN
ACCUMUI.ATIOI4 OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN TANKS (90-DAY)
ACCUMULATION OP SECONDARY MATERiAL - ABANDONED VS DISPOSED OF
AES4INISTRATIVE CONTRoLs AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
APPLICABILITY OF A PROPOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION TO CERTAIN DOE RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED IN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTU1( IWO PROCESS UNITS
CLARIFI CAT ION OF REGULATORY LANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO PERMITtED HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITI ES
CLARIFiCATION REGARDING THE HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLE EXCLUS 1099 FOUND IN 40 CFR 261 4(d)
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE • TRANSPORT. AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF
CONTAII04ENI’ AND DETRCTIO14 OP RELEASE PROM HAZARDOUS STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CN II.ATIWG AGS1Tr TO PEO0UCS A COPOICICIAL FERTILIZER
DOD )SIHITIOH5 EECO)IR SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO ECRA NHEN THERE IS AM INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FOUInRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO TEE FOUNDRY
XREF / /
9441.1995(06) 02/21 /95
9541 1966(19) 30/14/86
RASP / F

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD UWEX Page N O 140
GENERATOR IUT)I RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAl. WASTES FROM SNIPS. DEFINITION 9432 1986(05) 02/OS/eq
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS 9461 1988(01 1 08/31/88
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RRCYCI.ED. HANDLING 9441.1986(76) 10/08186
HOLDING. TEMPORARY. PERIOD. STORAGES AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS) 9432 1986(12) 07/28/ed
INTERPRETATION OF 300513fl1) 9484.1985 (01) 07/25/85
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO 1NTROOUCTION INTO SEWER 9441 1986(73) 09/25/86
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS 9451.1989(02) 06/26/89
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 94411986fl0) 04/16/86
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM. IL 9551.1990(09) 11/06/90
RCRA STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS. OFF-LOAD1NG FROM TANK TRUCIS 9488 1988(01) 02/09/88
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING 5fl9 5 944L1986(Ot) 01/06/86
REGUI.ATION AND PERMITTING OP I.A9O2ATORIES 9441 1988(39) 08/30/Sq
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS 9498.1994 112) 31/08/94
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES 9497 1987(02) 02/19/8?
REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY GENERATING. STORING, AND MANIFESTING P001 9475 19861018) 10/30/86
REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONG IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING 9497 1986(01) 02(06/86
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES 9444.1988(14) 08/26/88
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP EXCLUSION IS %4ITIWRAWN / FUIURE NETALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY 9433 1986(17) 09/30/86
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 9441 1986(89) 12/62/86
SPENT SULFUR1C ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY 9441 1988(19) 05/16/88
STORAGE FACILITIES. R CA APPLICASILITY TO 9422 1981(02) 11 (29 183
STORAGE PERMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN NAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING 9441 1989(11) 02/27/89
SU)04ARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COIO4ENTS 9523 00-17 09/02/88
TANK SYSTEMS SINCE CHANGES IN DEFINITION OF NAEARDOUS WASTE. CLASSIFICATION OF 9483 1988(03) 02/08/68
TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS 9461 1990 (011 06/07/90
USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE “NORMAL COURSE OF TRANSPORTATION” 9461 1994(01) 06/21/94
STUDENT S T TEST
(See Groundwater Monitoring) REEF / /
SUBPART CC
(See also Air Emissions) EREF / /
‘FREQUENTLY ASKED OUESTIOIIS ON THE 40 CFR PART 264/269. SUBPART CC AIR EMISSION STANDARDS 9480 1996(02) 02/01/96
‘REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR SUBPART CC COMPLIANCE 9480 1996(03) 03/01/96
SUBPART X
(See also Permit Application. Pederal Facilities. Characteristic Nesardous Waste) KEEP / /
•TREATASILITY STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 9441 1986(58) 06/01/86
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES 9442 1987(30) 11/30/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATHENT EXEMPTION FOE WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECHI 9412 1986(06) 02/06/86
Geologic Repositories
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES 9489.1991 (05) 02/22/91
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES 9472 1986 (04) 06/04/86
Miscellaneous Units
A DETERMINATION OP WHETHER A DETOX(SM) WET OXIDATION PROCESS WOULD BE REGULATED UNDER SUBPART X OR UNDER SUBPART 0 9489 1995)02) 08/07/95
APPLICABILITY OF RCA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT 9431 1994(02) 11/15/94
CLARIFICATION ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESORBIRS AND INCINERATORS 9489 1994 (01) 02/23/94
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES 9443 1987(30) 11(30/67
DRUM SNREDDER REOUI.ATION 9441 1988(28 ) 06/24/88
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 94 00-2 04/22/97
OPEN EURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT COD FACILITIES 9502 1986(16) 09/22/86
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES 9472 1986(04) 06/04/86

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 341
RCRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON BENEENE STRIPPERS AT NRC REFINERY
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OIL’S NORCD. LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM
RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARDING VARIOUS ISSUES ON THE COMBUSTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUMMARY OF ASS ISTANCE BRJJCJJ PERMInIP COMMENTS
THRES AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OP
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATHENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECNI
Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
DEMILITARiZATION OF MUNITIONS
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTE)1T TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY RROUIRRMENTS FOR
INCLUSION OF EMISSIONS FROM OB/OD UN1TS IN THE HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL FACILITY
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS PROVISIONS AS iT APPLIES TO OE/OD FACILITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN OPRN BURNING UNIT USED FOR TREATING EXCESS PROPELLANT
THERMAL TREATMENT UNiTS • SCOPE OF SUBPART X
Thermal Treatment
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF KO4S
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
CLARIFICATION ON ‘IllS DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESORBERS AND INCINERATORS
NOW TREATING FILTRATION MEDIA COMPARABLE TO ACTIVATED CARBON WOULD BE PERMITTED UNDER RCRA
ON- SITE TREATHENT EXEMPTION, REIHTERFRETATION OF
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OX IDATION UNIT I VERTECH)
SUBPARTS AR AND NB
ISee alec Incineration)
CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY THE ORGANIC AIR EMISSION STANDARD
INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN CONNECTORS AS ‘FLANGES’
SUBTITLE D
SUMPS
(See Solid Wane)
9499 1992101) 09/17/92
9412 1994101) 02/01/94
9499 1997101) 07/10/9 ’
9521 00-18 03/14/99
9432 1987(02) 04/02/97
9432 1986 (OS) 02/06/86
9441 1987103) 01/0718 ’
9441.1985(31) 10/03/85
9499 1987(02) 07/22/87
9499 1995(01) 01/ ID/95
9499 00-2 04/22/87
9502 1996(16) 09/22/86
9528 1992 (01) 10/1S/92
9489 1992(01) 08/24/92
9499 1988(01) 05/18/88
9441 1987(12) 03/03/97
9499 1991(04) 09/01/91
9489 1994(01) 02/23/94
9499 1996(02) 06/10/96
9453.1987(08) 12/15/97
9499 1991(04) 09/30/91
9496 1993 (01) 12/27/93
9499 1989101) 05/19/89
9432 1986106) 02/06/86
XREF / /
9534 1991 (01) 12/03/91
9531 1991(01) 02/23/93
XREF / /
SUPERFUND
(See Secondary Containment)
XREF / /
(See RCRA/CERCLA Intertace)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
(See a leo Land Dsepoeel Facilit lee)
‘CIRCUMSTANCES FOR OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS FOR UNITS AT AN INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
‘CLEAN CLOSURE
‘CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE
‘CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
‘CORRECTIVE ACT1ON FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
‘EXISTING SURFACE IMFOUNOMENT5 WITH LINERS
‘INTERIM STATUS VS PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR NEWLY REGULATED UNITS
XREF F I
XEEF / /
9522 1984 (01) 12/01/B4
9476 1987(03) 06/01/91
9S22 1999(01) 02/01/88
9484 1997 (04) 04/01/87
9484 1996(07) 07/01/86
9522 1994 (02) 05/01/94
9525 1989(01) 05/01/99

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX P 090 180. 142
‘LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNINEPT 9484 19151021 OEIOUBS
‘POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9522d986 102 03 10 ,0 1/56
‘PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9484 1984(01) 12 /01 184
‘REMOVAL OF TC WASTE FROM A SURFACE PONDNENT 944) 1991(02) 11/01/91
‘RETROFItTING FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUIIDMRDTS 9484.1987)09) 07101187
‘RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE ZMPOIDMSNTS 9528.1985 (03) 05101/88
‘RETROFX7TING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476 1906)04) 10,01186
‘SURFACE 1MPOUNb4RIITS CONTAINING WAETSWATER WHICH BECOMES REACTIVE WHEN DRY 9443 1983(02) 01 101/83
‘SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS RECEIVING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1983 (01) 02 101/83
AD2ACWT WASTE PILES INTO REGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, PLACEMENT OF IC IEA-GEIGY) 9484.1987 )051 06126/57
CLARIFICATION OF ‘ACTIVE MANAGEMEWr IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACiLITIES (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS) 9484 1994(01 ) 04/06/94
CLOSURE AFTER CESSATION OF RECEIPT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9476 1986 (031 10/08/86
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476.1981)08) 12 11.1151
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS 9484.1986)02) 04/02/86
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD 9416 DO-i) 02/08/BE
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 9476 0 1-12 02/02/80
COMBINATION OF SLUICES FROM ALL IMPOUNDMENTS TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSiS 9433.1957)07 ) 04/13/57
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIFFZNO. TEEADIE1Ft OF 9441 1986)86) l1/20/8C
DEADLINES APPLICAELE TO PROPOSED DELAT OF CLOSURE REGULATION. GUIDANCE 9476 1988104) 05/31/66
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVIDI CNARACTER)STIC 9443 3987(31) 12/07/57
EMPHOVEMENTE TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER INTERIM STATUS 9521 1911)011 09/10/04
INTERIM ETATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES. CODIFICATION RULE 12 /01 187 9522.1988(05) 11/30/88
INTERPRETATION OF 3005 (j) II) 9484.1985)01) 07/25/85
E03S LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM EIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS 9444 1981)521 1 .2 11 1 . 151
11103/11104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BDAT AND DELISTINO CRITERIA 9431 1907)06) 04/02/87
LAND D1SPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PRONULGATRD RULES 9476 3955)05) 12I13/85
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELI5TIHG OF 5484 1906(05) OS/23/86
METAL. E061 NASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDI4ENT-DELI5TIND PET iTION 9433 1987(16 1 08/07/87
MTR COMPLIANCE DATES FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (TNEEI4EX ENERGY) 94E4 1987(11) 08/07/81
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IRPOUNWIEWTS. GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS 9484 1955)03) 04/09/86
ND-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON. IL 5551 .1998 (14) 05/01191
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS. PERMITTING COVERAGE OP 9502 1904)01) 12/17/SI
OPERATING DAY DEFINED FOR TANKS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMEHTS 9483,1907)19) 10/16/87
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 4 TNEEMEI ENERGY/RADIAN 9521.1987)01) 08/07/87
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES 9441 1985(29) 05(23/85
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATIOH GALLERIES RY THE OOMB( AND OSW 9521 1991)01) 08/27/91
PREVIOUSLY UNREGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDERS 9502.1986 1019) 04 (30 (86
REDESIONATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS 9528 1988)02) 05/11/58
REGULATORY STATES OF SNELL OIL’S NDRCO. LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM 94)) 1994101) 02/01/94
REPLACEMENT UNIT. DEFINED - WASTE CONSOLIDATION FROM SEVERAL IMPOUNDMENTS 9484.1981101) 03/11/87
REPLACEMENT UNIT. DEFINITEOW, FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 9454.1986)01) 03/25(86
SECONDARY LEACNATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEMS - FM). TOP LINERS 9404. 19E7(03) 04/30/87
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1.t,1-TRICRLORDETRANE (ICE) 9551 1987(13) 06/26/81
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEWLY REGULATED DUE TO IC RULE 9404.1991)01) 03/08/91
SOLVENT-BEARING WASTEWATER, SLUDGE. AND ERIEE TEEA1RD AND STORED IN SURFACE IMPO3NIPIENTS 955L1987 (018 01/1.2(81
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR. USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO 9441 1905(20) 06/05/85
SUI04ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEA)) (PAT) COIQIENTS 9521.00-12 03/30/87
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICARILITY OF 3005(S) OF RCRA TO 1907(01) 06/09(81
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS. USE OF VHS MODEL 9433 1981(25) iD/ f l/B ?
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEiVING LRACRATE. REGULATION OF 9404 1985101b) 111 14/85
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFItTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE 9484 00-Se 11/15/55
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLING PI.AN FOR NOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE 9484 1988 )031 06/20/08
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS NOLD1NO ONLY K-WASTES GENERATED WIDER A TEMPORARY EXCLUSION 9133 1987)23) 10/OS/87
SURFACE 1MPOUNDMENTS VIS-A-VI5 NPGES-PERJ4ITTED DISCHARGE POINTS 5484.1906)09) 13/29/06
SURFACE IMPOUNDMSNTSØ’LAND TREATMENT UNITS REGULATION IF ASSOCIATED WWT SLUDGES ARE LISTED 9480.1905)02) 07/17/85
TANK AND SURFACE IMPOUND)4ENT. DEFINITIONS 9483 1983(01) 04/08/83
IC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION 9441 1991(12 ) 01/31/91

-------
07/ 06/9 0
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 143
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES. REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OP
TREATHRNT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
UCAPCO APPLiCATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c) (2) OF RCRA
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTiON FACILITIES • CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES PROM
Retrofit
‘DELAY OF CLOSURE FOR NON-RETROFITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTINUING TO RECEIVE NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
ACLO APPLIED TO SURFACE IMPOUNDJIEITr RETROFITTING PROVISION 3IOS(3I (3)
ALTSRNATS CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACLI POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS • RETROFITTING VARIANCES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (IS) RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUEST (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEIVING NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE AFTER MAEARDOUS WASTE N b ) RETROFI1 rING
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING REQUIRD4ENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUEST (UNION CARBIDE)
SURFACE WATER
SN-546
(See also WeEteWater, Clean Water Act)
ACLa PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP • INSTITUTE. WV. COMMENTS ON
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS. DISPOSAL OF
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASS ISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
9432 1987 (021 04/02/87
9404 1907(121 11/25/97
9400 1987 (021 10/29/87
9441 1986(28) 04/07/81
9404 1996(01) 06/01/96
9404 1907(08) 07/14/87
9481 1907(07) 07/24/07
9404 1986 (04) 04/21/86
9404 1987107) 07/14/07
9404 1906(08) 09/05/06
9404 1987(021 04/15/87
9404 1987(05) 06/08/07
EREF / /
9401 1987(04) 06/19/87
9412 1987( 12a) 11/04/87
9S23 00-14 03/14/86
XREF
9554 1991(04)
9445 3993(08)
9445 1987(04)
9442 1991(171
9443 1992(041
9445 1907(051
9445 1992(01)
9442 1995(01)
9445 1993(02)
9441 1992(19)
9551 1995(01)
9445 1993(03)
9445 1992(02)
9443 1993(07)
9433 1994(01)
9443 1992(01)
9442 1991(05)
9445 1993(01)
9442 1991(04)
9442 1993(01)
9443 1992(14)
9445 1993(07)
9445 1993(05)
944S 1994102)
9443 1986(10)
9554 1991(01)
9442 1991(11)
9443 19Bfl14)
9442 1991(06)
9445 1994(03)
9443 1993 (04)
9442 1990(03)
/ /
12/01/91
11/05/93
12/04/87
10/01/91
08/26/92
12/21/87
09/21/92
01/26/ OS
03/11/93
07/07/92
02/10/95
04/08/93
12/22/92
11/08/5 3
10/12 /9 4
03/09/92
03/2 7/ 9 1
01/21/93
03/25/9 1
01/18/93
06/03/92
09/02/93
04/29/93
03/10/94
05/05/06
01/08/91
07/09/9 1
08/11/07
05/09/9 1
03/10/94
04/02/93
11/19/90
•EW-846 TEST METNODS
ADDITIONAL ANALYTES FOR HWIR TARGET ANALYTE LIST IN WASTEWATER
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE TC RULE
ASYM 04982-80 (METHOD 0) AS AN EQUIVALENT METNOD OF TESTING FOR IGNITABILITY
ASTM STANDARDS IN THE RCRA PROGRAM
CAI.CULATION OF TCLP CONCENTRATIONS FROM TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
CLARIFICATION OF METHOD 8260 CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND ‘WASTE TYPE’
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
CLARIFICATION OF THE WE PHASE II REGULATION THAT APPEARED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTD(BER 19. 1994
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATION USING CC/MS HETNOGS
CLARIFICATION ON MATRIX SPIKES FOR METHOD 0310
CLARIFICATION ON THE IEVEL OF SULFIDE FOR DETERMINING 19 A WASTE IS HAZARDOUS UNDER THE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
CLARIFICATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A LABORATORY MUST USE THE ‘SW-846 A ORGANIC METHODS’ WHICH WERE RECENTLY PROMULGATED
CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPLIES TO SOLIDS
DEFINING IGNITABLE LIQUIDS METI(OD
DEFIN1TIOH OF HOLDING TIME
DILUTION OF TEET SAMPLING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES
NGI.DING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER
INITIAL MID CONTINUING CALIBRATION REQUIRZMEHTS IN MET)(OD 8240
ION CNRONATOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE FOR THE ANALYS IS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING SONICATION(3550) RATHER THAN SOXHLET(3540.3541)
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED TO RUN THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING
METhODS 1310 AND 1310 EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
MET)(OOS 8240 AND 8260 DIFFERENTIATION AND EQUIVALENCY
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR ORAPNITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL SW-846 METALS METHODS
REVISIONS TO THE TCLP
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPROVED METHODS FOR SUBPART X PERMITS

-------
07 /06196 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 844
SW-flaG FOR REQUIRED WASTE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO 264 13 kI lO 265 13 9472 1985101) 05/30/as
SW-0.46, THIRD ED1TION, HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOI.ATILES 19*7(06) 06/30/67
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS 94(2.1993114) 10/29/91
THE DIFFERENCE EE1IIEEN THE DEFiNITION FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IWUTAEa ITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS 9443 1995 )02) 00/24/95
USE OF ALUMINUM CAP LINERS INSTEAD OF TEFLON FOR SOIL SRNPLE CONTAINERS 9502 1996(05) 11126196
USE OF FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPZCTROSCOPY 19’TIRSI FOR NEADEPACE GAS SAMPLING ANALYSIS AND CHARACTERIZATION 9441 1996)02) 03(21/96
USE OF PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETIRIIINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE 9445 1393101) 041)9/93
USE OF ‘DIE METHOD OF STANDARD EDITIONS 9443 19*7)12) 06/23/87
VALIDITY OF METHOD 1060, NEXAVALENT CHROI41UM DIQESTION 9441 1992)05) 031 16/92
ENSUe
IEee Correction Action under Solid Waste Management Un it) KEEP / /
SYSTEM RNMOVAL EFFICIENCY ISRE)
lAme IncIr eratLonl XRRP / /
TANK SYSTEM
IEee also Generatore. Secondary Containment) l IRE? / /
CNAIIIES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORRECTION 9528 1966 1051 10/01108
O&IERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENt’S FOR TANK svwrn 9483 1989 )01) 041011*9
•INTEGRITY ASSESSMERT FOR TANKS AND POST-CLOSURE 9483 19091041 10101189
•MRNUFACTURINO PROCESS UNITS 9441 1909154) 10/01/69
•POET-CLOSURE PLANS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9476 1966103) 04/01/as
•REOULATION OF LEACNATE COLLECTION iMPS 9407 1996 1011 01/01196
•SECOND,42Y CONTAIIRmeIT SYSTEMS FOR IIAZAR000S WASTE TRNES 9401 1989107) 11/01/89
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION 9432 1980105) 10/01/as
CLARIFICATION OF TUE USE OP UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TO CONTAIN HAZARDOUS WAITE SPILLS 9403 1993101) 10/07/93
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS 9403 1986104) 03/Is/BE
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF RELEASE FRON HAZARDOUS STORAGE TAME SYSTEMS 9453 1908(10) 06/03/90
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOTE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA FOR DIRECT OPPLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED FUEL INTO A CEMENT KILN 9483 1988 1021 01/28/08
SECONDARY CO1OTAINMENY FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS 9483.1909103) 01/14/09
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION 9483.1988118) 12/12/88
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS 9483 1989(02) 01/09/09
TANK SYSTEMS SINCE CNAN0ES IN DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. CLASSIFICATION OF 94*3 1989(03) 02/08/00
TANK TREATMENT SYSTEM OP METAL-RICH RINSEWATERS 9493 .99D4Ol) 08/01/90
USE OP SI LICA FUME LIGRTWEIGNT AGGREGATE CONCRrE LINEM.S A S SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES IN NAZARDOUE WASTE TANR SYSTEMS 9483. 1991401) 04/04)97
Ancillary Equipment
APPLICASIL11I OF EPA’S REGULATIONS it INDOOR PIPING MID FLOW EQUALIZATION TAMES USED TO CONVEY SOLVENTS TO EXTERIOR TANKS 9483 1997102) 07/29/97
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUE OF A REPINERY DITCI( SYSTEM 9432 1994102) OS/32/94
DRAINS AND TRENCHES ASSOCIATED WITH TANK SYSTEMS 94*1 19fl112) 12/30/ES
HAZARDOUS WASTE TANE SYSTEM STAJIDARDS TO ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND EXEMPTED ELEMENTARY NSUTRALIIATION SYSTEMS 9483 1909101) 01/27/00
INDEPENDENT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS AND SCOPE OF TEE TERN 9483 1987 Ill) 07/20/81
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA IN THE DEFINITION OF TRI4E STSTEJ4 9483 1989807) 03/37)88
OPERATED TO CONTAIN, DEFINITION 94*3 1989(06) 11/30/09
PRESSURIZED PIPING SYSTEMS WITN AIJTOMJ,TIC SIIIIT-OFP DEVICES 9483 19971141 00/03/81
REGULATORY ETAT IIS OP SMRLL OIL’S NORCO. LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM 9432 1984101) 02/01/94
SEALED BELLOW VALVES USED IN LIEU OF SECONDARY COMTAINI4ENT FOR OEDRE VALVES 9483 1986102) 09/27/86
SEALLESS VALVE DEFINITION 9483 19*7 1181 10/01/87
SSCOIIDAEY CONTAINMENT FOR PIPING SYSTRI1S 9483 19871101 07/09/07
SECOIIDART CONTAiNMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ABOVE GROUND WELDED FLANGES AND SEALLESS VALVES 9483 1987111) 09/21/07
TANK SYSTEMS APPLICASLE TO PRODUCTION TANKS DURING CLEANOUT, PROCESS TRANSFER EQUIPMENT. AND NOSE LIMES 9483.1986131) 12/19/85
TANK ‘TREATMENT PROCESSES 94*3 1990)021 08/15/90
TANKS AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT DESIGN 9401 1987)09) 06/25/07

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 145
TEMPORARY TANK SYSTEMS USED IN RESPONSE TO EMERGENCIES, REQUIREMENTS FOR 9483 1987(04) 04/20187
Empty
EMPTY CONTAINER RULE APPLIED TO TANKER OR VACUUM TRUCKS 9441 1988(02) 0 1/0 7/86
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED CO)O4ERCIAL CNEMICAL PRODUCT 9441 1985(41) 12/12/85
PESTICIDS DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER 9457 2987(01) 03/25/87
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BUflHNG p 9441 1986(04) 01/07/86
TANK CARS AND DRUMS, DEFINITION OF EMPTY 9441 3884(34) 11128/84
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WNICN FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACHLOROPNENOL 944 4 1986 (03) 02/12/06
Mtnlnim Shell Thickness
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/ETGRAGE TANKS, PERMITTING 9483 1984(01) 02/23/04
MINIMUM SHELL ThICKNESS REQUIREMENT, WAIVER 9483 1983(05) 12/14/83
TANK SHELL THICKNESS REOUIREMENT 9483 2983(02) 04/20/RI
Tanks
‘C hANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES 9528 1987(09) 08/01/87
‘COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 9441 1989(04) 02/01 189
‘CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR TANKS 9483 1987(08) 09/01/87
•GENERATOR ACCUMULAT1ON AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1986(10) 11/01186
‘NAZARDOUS WASTE TANK - LEAK DETECTION 9483 1988(08) 09/01/88
‘HAZARDOUS HASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE 9476 1986(02) 09/01/86
•NAEARDOUE WASTE TANK REGULATIONS 9483 1986(05) 08/01/86
‘BAEARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1987(07) 05/01/87
‘RAEARDOUE WASTE TANKS 9481 1986(07) 10/01/86
‘NAEARDOUS WASTE TANKS - AGE DETERMINATION 9483 1988112) 06/01/88
‘NAKARDOUS WASTE TANKS - EKISTIND VS NEW TANK 9483 1988(09) 05/01/88
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1988(13) 06/01/80
•HAEARDOUS WASTE TANKS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING 9483 1986(04) 08/01/86
‘NAEARDOUE WASTE TANKS/CONTAINERS - CAPACITY OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 9483 1988(14) 06/01/88
‘INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1987(06) 05/01/87
‘LEAK DETECTION REQUIKEMENTE FOR RAZASDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1986(03) 08/0t/R
‘LEAK TESTING FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1986113) 12/o;/86
‘MOBILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS 9432 1987(05) 06/01/87
‘RECIRCULATING TANK, REGULATION OF 9483 1984103) 11/01/84
‘RELEASES PEON 90’DAY ACCUMULATION TANES 9451 1986105) 08/01/86
‘SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR NAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483 1988106) 04(01/88
‘SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR TANKS 9483 1987113) 07/01/87
‘SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS 9483 1988 108) 10/01/86
‘TANK CLOSURE IN 1977 - RCRA APPLICABILITY TO 9480 1987101) 05/01/87
‘TANK INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS 9483.1987 (15) 08(01/87
‘TANK REPLACEMENT 94 77 1988(03) 07(01/68
‘TANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS 9432 1988(03) 03 101/88
‘TANKS NOLD1NO NAZARDOUE WASTE 9483 1967102) 03/01/87
‘TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF USTs 9483 1909)09) 10/01/09
•TREATMEHT TANKS FOR LEACNATE OR LIQUID WASTES 9471 1984(01) 03 (01/84
‘WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK 9483 1988(15) 07/01/88
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUiREMENTS 1986(01) 04(16/06
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS POE THE DISPOSAL OF STORAGE TANKS 9483 1987(03) 04/08/67
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF 9441 1986(06) 11/20/86
CONTAI4INATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATRO REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATA8ILITY VARIANCE 9951 1990(05) 10/09/90
EVAPORATOR USED TO RDEVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432 1987(03) 05/01/87
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREAII4ENT/5TORAGE TANKS • PERMITTING 9483.1984)01) 02/23/84
EO3S LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTZWATERS 9444 1987(52) 12/11/07
MINIMUM SNELL TN1CEHESS REQUIREMENT, WAIVER 9483 1983(05) 12/14/03
ON-SITE TREA’IMSNT EXEMPtION, REINTERPRETATION OF 9453 1987(08) 12/15/87
OPERATING DAY DEFINED FOR TANKS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9483 1987(19) 10/16/07

-------
07/06/95 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 146
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WA5TEWA1’5R TRSATHENT UNITS 9503.52- IA 01 102/56
PETROLEUM REPINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTU8 9483 1990(03) 09/20/90
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM 9503 .51-lA 12/24/85
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS 9441.1991(17 ) 11/04/91
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTI VITIES 9521.199% (01) 10/11194
SECONDARY CONTAiNMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS 9483.1987 (16) 09/11/ f l
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OP A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY 9522.1968 (02) 03/07/88
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTKWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WW’IU EXEMPTION 9432.1986(01) 01/06/86
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSES 9441 1986 (25) 03/26/86
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT )SWMU) DETERMINATION 9483.1991 (01) 01/04/91
TANK AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, DEFINITIONS 9483 1983 )01) 04/08/83
TANK CONVERSION FROM WASTE STORAGE 70 PEEDSTOCX 570 5 - REGULATION 9483 1986)01) 09/13/86
TANK INSPECTION PROCEDURES 9483 1983)03) 09/21/83
TANK RULES APPLIED TO NW UNITE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 9483 1986)09) 1 1/18/ES
TANK SHELL TNICKNSSS REQUIREMENT 9483 1983)02) 04/20/83
TANK SYSTEM DESIGN-SECONDARY COHTAINMEHT 9483 1987)05) 09/29/81
TANKS USED FOR EMSRGENCY CONTAINMENT 9471 1984)03) 09/06/84
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF 9432 1987)02) 04/02181
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNiTS SNIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF 9441 1986(14) 02/25/86
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICAEILITY TO AN ASH TEKATPIEWT FACILITY 9432 1987)10) 08/28/87
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMEHT EKEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9431 00-1 01/11/88
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH) 9432 1986(061 02/06/86
TREAThEHT iN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262 34 9453 1986(07) 12/05/86
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS 9453 1991 (02) 09/20/91
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS 94S3 1986)081 12/22/86
TREATMEHT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERaTOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS 9453 1987)021 03/25/81
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTS EM PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 9441 1986)62) 08/19/86
USED OIL TANK CLASSIFICATION 9491 1986)08) 10/31/85
WASTE STORAGE TANK ATTACHED TO FILTRATION UNIT 9483 1983)04) 09/30/83
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CRRO5OTE SUMPS 9102 1986(15) 09/12/86
TANKS
(See Tank Syatee l KREF / /
TAX
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface) XREF / /
TChP 4TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC ‘LEACHING PROCEDURE)
(See Characteristic Hasardoua Waste, Nazardoue Wane Identification) NREP / /
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION
(See Deflating) XREF / /
TEST METHODS
(See alec Analytic Mathode, SW-84S) XREP / /
•SW’84S TEST METHOD 3060 9443 1981)20) 09/01/fl
ANALYTES TO LOOK FOR WHEN PERFORMING RCRA ANALYSIS 9442 1989)031 04/20/89
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR PETROLEUM REFINING RESIDUES AND WASTES 9445 1984)03) 05/2S/84
ASTM D4982-89 (METHOD 8) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGHITASILITY 9443.1992 (04) 08/26/92
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES 9442 1989)09) 11/03/89
CALCULATION OF TCLP CONCENTRATIONS PROM TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS 9445 1992)01) 09/21/92
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZATION - EVALUATION OF THE WASTE EVALUATION TEST 9442 1988)03) 05/02/88

-------
07/05/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page no 147
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS 9441 1992(19) 07/01/92
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATION USING Ge/MS METHODS 9445 1993 (03) 04/01/93
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH O F TREATED WASTES • USE OF SW-846 METHODS. WASTE IDENTIFICATION 1987(0Th ) 11/27/07
CORROSI VITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPl iES TO SOLIDS 9443 1992(01) Ij O9/92
DIOXIN STANDARD USRD TO TEST GAS CHRONAI’OGRAPEY COLUMNS• HANDLING OF 9441 19(5 107) 02/13/85
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION 1964 (05) 12/11/SI
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES 9443 1993 (01) 01/18/93
HOLDING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER 9441 1992(14) 06/03/92
ION CHROMATOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 9445 1993(05) 04/29/93
ISSUES CGNCERNIHG THE COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING EOHICATION(3550I RATHER THAN EOEHLET(3540.3S41) 9445 1994 (02) 03/10/94
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TESTING AND RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS 9551 1908 (03) 05/13/88
LIQUID. FREE LIQUID. RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS 9432 1989 (04) o l/20/8p
MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE VINYL MINI BLINDS 9451 1996 807) 07/12/96
ECHA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (tiOD ’E 9445 1985 (02) 04/23/ES
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES) 9445.1984 (05) 12/20/84
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES) 9445.1984 (01) 04/23/84
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR GRAPHITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL 5W-846 METALS METHODS 9445 1994 (03) 03/10/94
SOXTEC EXTRACTION SYSTEM VS SOI(HLET EXTRACTION SYSTEM FOR PREPARATION OF 9CR SAMPLES 9443 1988(063 05/31/86
SULFIDE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC 9443 1985 (04) 07/16/85
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES UNDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS 9551 1988 (01) 05/05/58
USE OF FAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETERMINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE 1993(04) 04/19/93
VALIDITY OF METHOD 3060, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM DIGESTION 9441 1992(05) 03/06/92
EquivalenCy
DETERMINATION OH THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P070 WASTE STREAMS 9554 1994(05) 07/26/94
Procedure
APPLICABILITY OF TIlE PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO SORRENTS 1991(06) 10/12/93
CLARIFICATION OF THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITARILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS 1995(03) 09/19/95
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE TOXICITY TEE? 9443 1981(01) 06/17/81
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES 9442 1989(02) 01/25/89
INAPPROPRIATE USE OF METHOD 1311 )TCLP) AS AN ALTERNATIVE RETRACTION PROCEDURE 9445 0993(09) 12/07/93
MULTIPLE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE. METhOD 1320 9442 1988(06) 10/19 188
TEE DIFFERENCE RETWSEN THE DEFINITION FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC OP IGNITARIL1TY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS LIQUIDS 9441 1995(02) 08/21/95
THERMAL TREATMENT
(See Subpart E l (Sea aleD Incineration) XREF / /
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA 9441 1995(10) 03/08/95
TNT
(See Hazardous Waste Identificetjoup EREF / /
TOLUENE
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) EREF / /
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT UNITS
(See Exclusions. Treatment) EREF / /
TOXICITY
(See Hazardous Waste IdentS(tcat ion) EREF I /

-------
07/06/93 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 148
TRANSFER FACILITIES
(See Transporters) XRSF / /
TRANSPORTATION
(See Transporters) XREF / /
TRANSPORTERS
(See also Generators) XREF / /
‘100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS 9451 1957(04) 08/01/87
‘DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION 9461 1951104) 07/01/el
‘EEPORT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS 9456 3986(01) 10/01/86
‘GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTSRS 9461.1959 03) 04/01/89
‘MANIFEST RRQUIREMRNTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9462 1995(01) 01/01/95
‘MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS 9462.1987(02) 10/01/81
‘SIGNING TEE MANIFEST AS AN AGENT WHEN IMPORTING HAEARDOUS WASTE 9462 1995(02) 03/01/95
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS 9482 1986(011 01/21/66
DO VESSELS TRANSPORTING A RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMRER FOR TRANSPORT BWPMEEN ‘me u B AND BELGIW4? 9455 1995)01 ) 02/17(95
DOT’S ROLE IN THE TRANSPORTATION OP HAZARDOUS WASTE 9463 1980(011 06/18/85
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION 9455.1991(011 02/05/91
LABELING OF STEEL DRUMS NEED NOT INCLUDE PREV iOUS CONTENTS 9453.1987)071 11/17/87
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS 9451 1999)02) 56/26/89
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION 9453 1989(07) 07/13/89
Trenster FacilIties
‘ACCUMULATION TIME FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTERS 9496 1992)011 00/01/92
‘EXPORT EEQUIRENEN’IE FOR TRANSPORTATION THROICH TRANSIT COUNTRIES fl 1995)02) 03/01/95
‘MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION 9441 19S7(321 04/01/87
‘TANK STORAGE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES 9461 1996(011 06/01/96
‘TRANSFER FACILITY AS CENTRAL COLLECTION POINT 9461 3991(01) 11/03/91
CLARIFICATION OP REGULATION OF PURL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES 9496 1994(13) 12/05/94
FEDERAL POLICY ON SEVERAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE USE OP THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST BY HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTERS 9462 1996(01) 03/07/96
GENERATION OF AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATOM BATTERIES) 9461 1981(03) 07/ID/el
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS 94(1 1900)01) 08/31/00
REGULATION OF PURL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES 9521 1994)01) 10/17/94
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS 9461 1989(01) 01/03/09
STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES AND THE AUTHORIZATION OF STATES REGULATING THIS STORAGE 9461 1994(02) OE/I7/94
TEN DAY REGULATION FO TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9461.1906(01) 04/10/86
TRANSFER FACILITY REGULATION INTERPRETATION 9461.1990(02) 10/30/90
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WNERE USED OIL CAN BE M IEED WITH CRUDE OIL 9592.1994(04) 56 (09/94
TRANSPORTERS MOVING WASTE FROM LARGE CONTAINERS TO SMALLER CONTAINERS AT TRANSFER FACILiTIES 9461 1989(04) 07/20/89
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS 9452 1991(01) 07/26/91
USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE ‘NORMAL COURSE OF TRANSPORTATI oN ’ 9461 1994(01) 06/21/94
Transportet ton
‘EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 1966)01) 09/01/96
‘GENERATORS AIR) DESIGNATED TRANSPORTERS 9462 1996(03) 03/01/96
‘MANIFEST REQUIREMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION OF SPENT SOLVENTS 9541 1985(07) 05/01/05
‘SELF-TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL BY SERVICE CONTRACTORS 9592 1997)03) 07/01/97
BATtERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT fl 1987(01) 02/12/07
BULIIING AND CONSOLIDATING SNIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES 9461 1985(01) 09/19/05
SULKING OR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION 9432 1590(03) 03/01/50
CONSOLIDATION OF SEIPMENTS AND MIXING OF NAZARDOUS WASTE RY TRANEPORTERE 9461 1983(01) 01/30/83
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE, TRANSPORT. AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF 9402 1985(01) 11/26/ES
DESIGNATED FACILITY (RIDER THE TREATARILITY STUDY RECLUSION 9432 1991(01) 09/27/91

-------
07/06 ,96 KEYWORD INDEX Page No 149
DOT’S ROLE IN THE TRANSPORTATION OP HAZARDOUS HASTE 9463 1960)01) 06/16130
EXPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE 10 CEMTEAL AMERICA 9573 1990101) 02/16/90
EXPORTERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE DO MRXICO. RESPONSIBILITIES OF 1907102) 06/isle?
HAZARDOUS WASTE HARKING REQUIREMENT APPLIED TO STATE REGULATED WASTE 9453 1964 (01) 05/16164
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS 9461 19661011 06/31/68
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED. HANDLING 9441 1966(76) 10/06/56
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OP LAB SAMPLES 9441.1969(20 1 04/21/69
LOR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACES 9554.1990(11) 11/20/90
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PEIGE DO I IFYROD IJCTIGN INTO SEWER 9441 1966173) 09/25/66
MAHEETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL. NOTIFICATION OF 9494 1966(01) 02/09/66
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOE HEPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS 9441 1996(10) 04/16/66
P iPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9412 1966(00) 04/30/66
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON HAZARDOUS WIThIN TIlE STATE 9541 1906(04) 03/03/06
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EICLUSION FOE ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH 9441 1966(65) 09/03/66
RCEA STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS, OFF-LOADING FROM TANK flIntS 9460 1966(01) 12/09/86
RECYCLING OP MOWING AND CASTING SANDS 9441 19e6(01I 01/06/66
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES 9441 1966(39) 06/30/66
RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 40 CFR PART 262 REGARDING TEAN’IPOETATION OF RFCYCLAHLE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9462 1994(01) 11/09/94
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SIKICE SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATEPIZIIS 9527 1992101) 11/03/92
TRANSPORTATION EEGULATIONS 9461 0990(01) 06/07/90
TRUCE OR RAIL SHIPMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A P0TH 9441 19e6 166) 01/30/86
UNIFORM MANIFEST FORM. USE 0) CONTIHUATION SHEET 9452 0967)02) 04/30/67
WASTE’AS.FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION 1966(02) 03/19/86
TEEATA6ILITY STUDY
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface) EREP / /
TEEATW WASTE
(See Treatment) UHF / /
TREATMENT
EREF / /
•CGHDITIOHS FOR EXCLUSION OF PORTABLE TREA114ENT UNITE 9471 1984 102) 03/01/64
•SURFACE IMPOUNUMENTS RECEIVING HAZARDOUS WASTE 9441 1963(01) 02/01/63
•TEEATMENT - TWO PARTS •T0 DEFINITION 9444 1990)01) 01/01/90
TEEATMENT CAPACITY 95Z5 1966(07) 12/01/66
•TREATHENT IN A GENERATOR’S 90-DAT CONTAIHMZNT RUILDTNG 9451 1992(01) 08/01/92
•TREATHEHT OF INFECTIOUS WASTE 9432 1961(11) 09/01/67
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT EEQUIRPIZNTS 9453 1966101) 04/16/66
AEROSOL CANS, ON-SITE DEPRESSURIZATION OP 9432 1966)04) 09/30/06
APPLICABILITY DY RCEA REGULATIONS TO A HVI)ED-MI5T UNIT USED IN THE TRRATMENT OF WASTEWATE9 AT DEY-CLEANING FACILITIES 9431 1994(01) 06/02/94
APPLICABILITY OF ECU USED OIL EEGULATIOHS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 9592 1994(06) 07/11/94
6ULEING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES 9461 1905(01) 09/19/65
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGEGUI 1D INJECTION 9489 1990(01) 06/30/90
CEMENT KILN OUST WASTE 9441 1986)36) 07/29/86
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CADMSI IS HOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RDSD PERMIT 9432 1965(01) 11/19/65
CLARIFICATION OF STATUE OF TERA174ENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL BLENDING ACTiVITIES 1992)01) 10/27/92
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-646 METHODS. WASTE IDEIITIFICATIGN 944S I967(03e) 01/17/61
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLAT3LZS FROM AlE STRIPPING. TEEATMEHT OF 9441 1966(66) 11/20/06
DECANNING AND CRUSHING OPERATIONS 9432 0964103) 04/26/64
DELISTING RESIDUE PEON TEEATHEHT OF LISTED WASTES 9441 I96 1(DS) 04/14/SI
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY A3OD APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCI1IERATIDN FOE TWO P076 HASTE STREAMS 1994(05) 07/26/94
DIOXIN TRIAL RURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT 94S0 00-IA 05/07/66
ELECTRIC ABC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TRSATHENT PROCESS 1966(33) 12/29/66

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. ISO
EPA’S DETERMINATION ON WHETHER MACRODICAPSULATION PROCESS ADDRESSES THE REQUIRDIENTS OF 40 CFR SECTION 268 45. TABLE 1 9554 199S(02) 09/19/95
EVAPORATOR USED TO RD4OVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE 9432.1987 (031 05/01/87,
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY 9441 1987(131 03/04/87
GRAY IRON FOUNDRY WASTE DISPOSAL 9486.1961(01 1 06118/81
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE 9441.1906(83) 11/13/86
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, APPLICATION or 9486 1985(01) 03/27/85
EAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS USED AS QUENCHWATER 01 CD4ZNT PRODUCTION 9489.1991 (01) 02/15/91
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION 9551 1990(06) lo/14/9Q
LEAD-REARING WASTES TREATMENT STANDEEDS 9554 1990(06) 06/25/90
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES 9443 1987(68 ) 08/19187
ON-SITE TREATMENT 8! GENERATORS UNDER 262 34 94S3 1987(03) 07/01/87
ON-SITE TREATMENT E]IEMNTION, REINTERPRETATION OF 9453 1987 )08) 12/1518 1
PCB DECHLORINATION TREATMENT PROCESS 9441 1988(47 1 11/07/SE
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANES OR CONTAINERS 9453 1986(041 07/25/86
PEPMITFING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES OCCURRING IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS 9453.1986 (03) 06/17/86
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES 9441 1985(29) 08/23/85
RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES 9441 ,1993(03) 03/05/93
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U S EPA COMEUST1ON RESEARCH FACILITY 9444.1988(05) 03/11/88
REGULATORY STATUS OF ABSORBENT MATEEIAL WHEN MIXED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION 9441 ,1992(29) 09/04/91
REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VENADIUI4 PENTOXIDE REGULATION UNDER RCRA fl 1986(17) 09/04 /86
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS 9442 1984(03) 02/16/84
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF EAZARDOUB WASTE, I D NUMBERS FOE 9441.1986 (051 01/16/86
SOURCE REDUCTION 9451 1987(01) 07/21/87
SPENT IRON SPONGE EEOULATION AND TREATMENT 9443 1986(02) 01/17/86
STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY 9441 1990 )16) 06/15/90
SIDO4ARY OF ASSISTANCE EBANCN PERMITTING COMMENTS 9523 00-17 09/02/88
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES 9483 1990)02) 08/15/90
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A RAOHDUSR EYSTD4 9432 1986115) 12/22/ac
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EIEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER 9431 00-1 02/11/86
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT FACILITY, REGULATORY CLARIFICATION OF 9433 1983(01) 02/18/83
TREATING WASTES IN GENERATORS ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS 9453 1992(01) 07/23/92
TREATMENT AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260 10 SUBPART E 9432 1984(05) 11/26/84
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262 34 198S4D7) 12/05/85
TREATMEÜT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FEOM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS 9453 1991 (02) 09/20/9i
TREATMENT OF hAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR’S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS 9453 1986(08) 12/22/ES
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR’S ACCUMIILATIDN TANKS 9453 1987 102) 13/25/87
TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9443.1988(44) 10/27/88
USE OF ON-SITE PRECIPITATION PROCESS AS AN ACCEPTABLE PRETREATMENT STEP ADJUNCT TO MERCURY RETORTING 9554 1993(01) 06/03/93
WASTEWATRR TREATMENT SYSTEM. SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL EOTI’OIIS IN 9441 L9ES)43) 12/17/85
Elological Treatment
PEEFORMANCE AND SAFE APPLICABILITY OF COLO-MIE TBCNNOLOGIES AND EIOREMEDIATION FOR PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SITES 9502.1996(031 04/24/96
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION 9441 1991(12) 37/31/91
ø eaica1 Stabiliration
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9487 1987(011 0L/20/8
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN POE NH PLATING COMPANY 9433.1990(06) 11/27/go
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES 9554 1991(01) 01/08/91
LIQUIDS FOR WIND DISPERSAL CONTROL AT HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, UEE o 9487 00-lA 04/21/86
ON-SITE TREATMENT OF MANHOLE SEDIMENT WNICN MAY EXCEED THE TOEICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD 9553 1994(01) 06/22/94
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TRAM )PAT) COMMENTS 9523 00-14 03/14/ES
De f inition
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FAC2LITY 9441 1987(75) 09/ IS/87
CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT, AS DEFINED AT 40 CFR SECTION 260 10, AS IT RELATES TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BLENDING ACTIVITIES 9432 1995(02) 10/12/9S
COMPACTING HAZARDOUS WASTE INSIDE STEEL DRUMS AS TREATMENT 9503 1991(01) 05/21/91
PROCESSING LEAD ABATEMENT DEBRIS TO MEET HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLER’S SPECIFICATIONS 15 NOT ‘TREATMIHT AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260 10 9423.1994 (03) 10/07/94

-------
07/06/90 XS J RD UNDEX Page No 151
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING ScENARIOS 9490 1994 (12) 11/09/94
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT P)flff 9441 1906162 ) 00/19/06
Drue Shredding Unit
DRUM SNUGGER REGULATION 9441 i908t2 0) 06/24/80
Primary Treatment
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS 9441 1905 (08) 02/22/85
Secondary Treatment
PERMIT- EXEMPT STATUS OP SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS 9503 .52-lA 01/02/06
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM 9503 51-lA 12/24/05
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY NASTEWATERS 9441 1905)00) 02/22/05
SLUDGE DENYGRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATRR TREATMENT UNIT 9432 1907)00) 00/03/07
SLUGGE DRYER ADDED TO NASTEWATRR TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION 9432 1906 101) 01/06/86
So lidicicetion
ACCUMULATION AND TREAD€NT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERJ4IT REQUIREMENTS 9453 1906)01) 04/16/86
0111.X LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 9407 1907 101) 01/20/87
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRA1N/I,E_ACI IING 9467 1966)09) 06/12/86
DECNARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT NAVE UNDERGONE CNIMICAL SOLIDIFICATION 9493 1905(05) 12/13/05
PCB-CONTAMINATSD WASTES, STABILIZATION OF 9407 1900)01) 02/03/00
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES WIDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS 9551 1960)01) 05/05/00
‘Focally Encloeed Treatment Unite
ASHY CNEMICAL/HUNITIONS SYSTEM, REGULATORY STATUS OF 9527 1985(01) 1 1/19/OS
DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF A TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT (TET) EXEMPTION 9412 1980)06) 02/02/80
Treated Wa eta
TREATMENT WITHOUT A PERMIT - MIXING WASTE 9441 1906(45a) 05/01/86
REGION V FURL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS 9441 1991(17) 11/04/91
REGULATION OF OILY MAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE 9493 1991(01) 01/00/91
TANK TREATMENT SYSTEM OF HETAL-RICN RINSEWATERS 9403 1990(01) 00/01/90
TKEAII%RNT STANDARDS
(See I.and Dsepoaal Reetrictione) EREF / /
TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
‘DELAY OF CLOSURE 9476 1997(01) 02/01/97
INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES OF TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DIIPOSAL FACILITIES 9472 1997(01) 06/10/97
TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (T5DFe)
(See a lao Interim Statue Proceea, Parent Proceee, Storage, Treatment, Land Disposal Facetstlee) XREF / /
‘ANIIUAL PAYMENTS INTO A STANDBY TRUST FUND WNEN USING A LETTER OF CREDIT 9477 1996 (03) 12/01/96
‘FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR TIlE ECRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST 9477 1996(01) 11/01/96
‘FREQUENTLY ASEED QUESTIONS ON TIlE 40 CFR PAET 264/265 . SUBPART CC AIR EMISSION STANDARDS 9400 1996(02) 02/03/96
‘LOCATION OP OPERATING RECORDS AT TRSATIRENT, STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 9475 1995(02) 10/01 195
‘PRETREATMENT CF CHARACTERISTIC WASTES SUBJECT TO LANG DISPOSAL RESTRICT1OKS 9551 1990(03) 09/01/93
‘TANGIBLE NETWCRTN REQUIREMENTS FOR RCR.A SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 1996 1021 12/01/96
‘TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261 3(a) (2) (iv) (A) 9443 1991(13) 07/01/91
CLARIFICATION OP DEFINITION OF FACILITY’ AND PAST A HAPPING REQUIEEMENTS 9S23 1993(DlI 10/07/93
EXCLUSIONS FOR PEE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON 9477 00-6 11/23/07
GENERATOR W1TN RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SNIPS. DEFINITION 9432 1986(05) 02/OS/ eS
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO 9441 1906(07) 01/23/66

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 152
WcflIoN STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASPS MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 9472 19911011 10 ,01/91
Active/Inactive Faciliflee
CLARIFICATION OP ACTIVR MANACEMSNT’ iN CLOSING WASTE MA31AGEMEI#I’ FACILITIES (S uRFACE IMPOUNOI4ENTS) 9484.1994(01) 04/06/94
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U S ARJIY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS 9502 1986(09) 05 /08/86
DOD’S 199 PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION 9502 , 1 986 (17) 09/29)86
FACILITY TEANSFER/RECDNITRUCTION DURING INTERIM S1’ATIJS 9477 1986(011 01/03/86
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - ACRA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS 9451 1999(02) 06/26/89
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING OH-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIEED BED INCINERATION 9522.1985(05) 12/13/85
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCWIJRES AND AUTHORITIES 9502.8986(021 01/31/86
RiSE RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 00-5 11/23/87
SATELLITE ACCIP4LTLATION AREA AND REGULATIONS 9453.8987 (01) 02/22/87
TRIAL BURN
ISee Incineration) REEF / /
TNDFE
(See Treatment Etorege end Disposal Fac il itieS) REEF / /
U-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) REEF / /
UNDERGROUND INJECTION
(See etea Land Otepoeel Restrictions. CorrectIve Action, DiEposeti REEF / /
CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS 9527 1986(02 1 04/01/86
‘CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR U1 WELLS 9512 1986 107) 04/01/86
APPLICABILITY OF ECU 1.AND DISPOSAL RESTRICTiONS TO CERCLA RESPONSE ACTIONS 9553.190 1021 11/13/89
BULR LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS 9487.1986(091 06/12/06
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION 9489 1990(01 1 08/30/90
CLASSIFICATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES 9502.1992 (011 02/04/92
DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTE RINSEATES, DISPOSAL BY DEEP WELl, INJECTION 9444.1965(14) 09/10/85
LAND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES USE OF NUCLEAR TEST SITES 9480 1984 IOU 06/12/84
PERFORMANCE AND PEEM1’I 3’ING STANDARDS IN 1004(b). PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OP HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES 9489 1985(011 09/10/89
REINJECTIGN OF OROUNCWATER DURING AUTHORIZED CLEANUP ACTIVITIES 9522 1993(011 01/04/91
TEE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON )IONNAEAROO IJ5 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTEOL WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRAL OIATION UNITS 9554 1994 (02) 01/09/94
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT) VERTZCN) 9432.1986(06 ) 02/06/86
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS. INPLE)4SNTATIDN 9502 00-3 08/04/RI
UNIVERSAL WASTES
X 5EP / /
‘LEAD-ACID RATI’ERISS AIID UNIVERSAL WASTE 9593 1995(011 12/01/95
‘UNIVERSAL WASTE CONSOLIDATION POINT REGULATION 9593 1997(011 02/01/ r I
COLLECTION AND RECYCLING OP HOUSEHOLD BATTERIES 1997)05) 05(16 (97
DETERMINATION ON WNRTHER A GENERATOR’S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONNAEAROOUS 9441 19961211 06/22/99
UNIVERSAL WASTE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 9593 1997102) 02/13/97
Large QuantitY Handier
‘UNIVERSAL NASTY HANDLER STATUS 9S93 1997(03) 05/01/97
THE LASSLING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 40 CFR PART 273 FOR HAEARIIOUS WASTE BATTERIES 9593.1997 (04) 05/11/97
Nottilcatice
‘FREQUENTLY ASNED QUESTIONS ON TSR UNIVERSAL WASTE RRCW,ATIONS 9593 1996 )01) 05/01 196

-------
07/06/91 REYNORD I? Page NO 153
DOES THE UNIVERSAL WASTE VIRAL RULE SUBJECT CERTAIN WASTE TYPES TO SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS 9593 1996(01) 04/17/96
Smell Quantity Handler
‘UNIVERSAL WASTE HANDLER STATUS flfl 19971031 05 10 1/97
UN! VERS IT1ES
(See Generetoro) (See also EPA I D Numberl lIRE ? I F
UNSATURATED ZONE
(See Groundwater Monttortng) EREF I I
UNUSED MATERIALS
(See Reclamation) lIRE? / /
USE-CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL
(See Recycle) XREP / /
USED OIL
(See alao Burning and Blending. Hazardous Waste Fuels, Petroleum Refinery Wastes) ERR ? / F
‘BURNING/BLENDING OP UNUSED COWIRRCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (EYLD1E) WITH USED OIL 9442 1905 101) 12/01/85
‘ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITS CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION 9495 1994 (01) 05/01/94
‘MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE 1993 (02) 02/01/93
‘OFF-SPEC IPICATION USED OIL FUEL 9454 1906(02) 02/01/86
‘RECYCLED USED OIL - TEC hNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING. COURT DECISION 9433 1900 (12) 11/01/81
‘SELF-TRANSPORTATION OP USED OIL BY SERVICE CONTRACTORS 9592 1997(03) 07/01 197
‘THE DEFINITION OP USED OIL 9592 1997 (02) 01101197
‘USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT 9493 1905 (06) 12/01/05
‘USED OIL FOE DUST SUPPRESSION/ROAD TREA T SENT 9441 1990 (00) 03/01/90
‘USED OIL MARKETER 9592 1968(01) 02/01/06
‘USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTIOMS HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WREN BURRED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY’ 9592 1994 (11) 09/01/94
‘USED OIL USED FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OR ROAD TRRATHRNT 9441 1990(09b) 03/01/90
‘USED OIL. DEFINITION OF 9431 1966(01) 0 1101166
APPLICABILITY OP USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO VEGETABLE OIL NW ANIMAL OIL 9592 1997 (01) 02/07/97
AIGMIEER MULTI-OIL FUELED NEATBRS. INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR 1900(02) 09/22/88
AUTOMOTIVO FLUIDS. REGULATION OP 9441 1907(14) 03/06107
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, STATUS OF 1907(04) 03/06/87
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS A PR INDUSTRiAL BOILERS 9432 1906(03) 01/09/86
BURNING OF USED OIL 9495 1909(02) 10 117/89
CLARIFICATION OF LANGUAGE IN TNR PREAMBLE TO TSR FINAL RULE ON USED OIL 9592 1992(01) 07/08/92
DECISION NOT 10 REQUIRE NOTIFICATION PROM GENERATORS WHO BURR SPECIFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE 9495 1907(03) 03/26/87
DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS OF HALOGENATED HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS AS CONTAINED IN USED DIL 9592 1996(01) 02/08/96
NSWA PROHIBITION ON TNR USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 00-lA OS/31/86
HYDRAULIC DEVICES CONTAMINATED WITS OIL DURING QUALITY CONTROL TESTING 9493 1906(20) 08/22/86
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITS TCD0 THROICH USE AR AN ANALYTICAl. STANDARD 9444 1987 (40) 10/23/07
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING 9442 1991(11) 07/09/91
HIKED WASTE REGULATION - RCEA REQUIREMENTS VS NRC REQUIREMENTS 9451 1909(02) 06/26/89
PROPOSED PERMIT-BY-RULE FOR USED OIL RECYCLORS 949S 1986(31) 11/24/06
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE 9493 1991(01) 01/08/91
REGULATIONS OOVERN1NG TEE MillING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS NW USED OIL 9441 1992)38) 11/05/92
REGULATORY STATUS NW MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS NW ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS 9551 1993(04) 11/17/93
TO EULB DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS 9441 1991(15) 09/25/91
TO RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL 9451 1991(03) 04/16/91

-------
07/06/98 KEYWORD INDEX Page No. 154
NO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STAIVS 1991 (01) 06/05/91
USE OF USED OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9592 1996)02) 02/15/96
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE 9495 1990(01) 06/13/90
USES OIL AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT 9592 1996)03) 02/26/96
USES OIL CONTAIIIHATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED 9441 1984(30) 10/22/04
USED OIL DEFINITION APPLICABILITY TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT 94 11.1990(33) 11/10/90
USED OIL DEFENI7ION TO OPU O-GEAR LUBRiCANT GEARIIE” 9441 1990(23) 1 1/30 190
USED OIL DESTINED FOR RECYCLING 9495 1987(06) 04/17/87
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION 9441 1990)30) 10/30/90
USED OIL FILTERS. REGULATORY DETERMINATION 9442 1990 lO s ) 10/30/90
USED OIL FOR 111GUSTRIAL BURNERS 9495 1986)22 ) 09/15/06
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION 9441 2986)11) 02/11/86
USES OIL TARE C1.ASSIPICATIDH 9483.1986)06) 10/31/86
Do- It-Youreeifere )DIYEEe)
BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS. iNDUSTRIAL FURNACES. o SOILERS 9495.1986 (03) 02/13/86
CLARIFICATION OF HOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO SERVICE STATION DEALERS’ THAT HANDLE USES OIL 9592.1994112) 11/10/94
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL RULES AS THEY APPLY TO DO-IT-YOURSELF OiL CHANGERS 9592.1994 1031 04/08/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE RERUflABLE PRESUMPTION’ PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MAI4AGRMENT STANDARDS 9592.1994110) 09/28/94
INTERPRETATION OP THE REGULATORY EXEMPTION FOR BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS 9592 1995)021 08 (25/99
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF ST DO-IT-TOURSELFERS 9441 1967)64) 08 1 *1/87
FUel
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL 9494 1986)03) 03/01/86
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FURL BROEERS 9454 1986)01) 01/01/86
‘HAEARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS 9441 1986)87) 1 1101/86
‘HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL 9) J)(fl5 5 9453.1985)04) 11/01/89
•UEE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL. RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING SEERCISES 9493 1985)04) 11/01/89
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 9494 1906(0S) 04/11/86
APPLICAB1LITY OF 40 CFR PART 279 TO ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL 9592 1996408) 11/27/96
BEV1LL AI4ENOMENT APPLIED TO COAL OASIFICATION FACILITY 9441 1987(76) 09/15187
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS. DISTINCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD 9432 1986)02) 01/03/86
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEIR4 PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9441 1986)9S) I2/23/8
BURNING COMPRESEOR OIL WITH AIQ4ONIA IN SPACR HEATERS 1991)03) 04/23/91
BURNING OF OFF-SPEC USED OIL 9494 19)6)OSaI 16/30/86
BURNING OP USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY kilO USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 1986)09) 14/21/fl
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES 9495 1986(05) 03/05/86
BURNING USED O 1L AND TEE LEAD SPECIFICATION 9495 1986)28) 11/12/66
BURNiNG USED O 1L GENERATED BY PRIVATE BOAT OWNERS OW-SITE 9494 1991)041 04/23/91
BURNING UEED OIL IN SPkCE HEATERS INDUSTRIAL FURNACES. AND BOILERS 1986)03) 02/13/86
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TARE BOTTOMS 9441.I98S)3 1 09/01/86
COAL TAR DECAI8TER SLUDGE WASTB PILE (TOLEDO COKE) 9441 1987(98) 12(34(87
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY 9494 1986(06) 12/31(86
HAIARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADEHCE PRODUCT 312. REGULATION OF 9494 1986(04) 04/11/ES
HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BEEN MIXED WITH USED OIL )I000ppiB total )talogenE) )REBU7TASI.E PRESUMPTION) 9495 1986 (08) 04/08/86
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES. APPLIED 9528 1986)30) 2 3/13/86
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USES TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 1985(01) 10/0I(8
MARKETING OR BURNING HAEABDOUS WASTE FUEL. NOTIFICATION OF 1986(01) 03/09/86
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITH USED OIL IRIBUTFABLE PRESUMPTION) 9495 1906)041 02/28/06
NOTIFICATION BY IINERS OF USED OIL WHO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIONI 9495 1987)01) 01/20/87
OFF-SPRCIFICATION JET FURL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL 9441 1986)19) 03/08/16
RECYCLED GAEOLIHE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES 9441 1986)22) 03/19/86
REGULATORY STATUS OF COMSUSTION RSSIOUALS OENERAIBU FROM CO-EURNIHO OF ‘SPECiFICAT iON’ USED OIL FUEL AND VIRGIN FUEL OIL 9992 1993 (03) 04/29/93
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY. WASTE MANAGEMENT TA il 9441 1986 142) 05/20/86
EGO OOI4PLIANCR WIT)) TC RULE 8441 1990126) 09/20/90
USED OIL AND OIL BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED REFINERY PRODUCTS 9495 1986(02 I 01/11/86
USED OIL COHTA3IIHATIOH THROUGH NORMAL USE OR WIRING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFiNED 9441 1984(301 10/22/84

-------
07/06/99
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 155
USED OIL FIRED SPACE HEATERS
USED OIL FUELS BURNED IN INCINERATORS
USED OIL INTRODUCED 11Pm REFINERY PROCESS WIDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
USED OIL. BURNiNG OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES IMPLEMENTATION
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF
Marketer
‘USED OIL MARKETER - DEFINIT iON
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR NAREETERS OF IIAEARDOLJS WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FURL CADENCE PRODUCT 312 • RROULATION OF
MAREETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FURL. NOTIFICATION OF
USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, 1NTERPRETATIOR OF SUBPART S
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES. IMPLEMENTATION
9495 1996(21) 09/15/86
9495 1996(13) 06/27/86
9441 1996111) 02/11/06
9441 1996(40) 07/31/86
9494 1996(02) 03/29/80
9494 1995(031 10/11/ES
9592 3998(09)
9592 1992 (02)
9592 1996188)
9592 1996(07)
9592 1996(06)
9592 1994(08)
5592 1914 (061
9S92 1994(09 )
9592 1994(12)
9592 1994(02)
9592 1994(09)
9592 199) (06)
9592 1993(07)
9592 1993(02)
9592 1993(05)
9592 1993 (04)
9494 1994(02)
9592 1994 (03)
9S92 1994 ( 10)
9592 19951029
9592.3993(09)
9592 1994107)
9441 1993 (19)
9444 1994 (01)
9S92 1993(01)
9592 1993 (09)
9592 1994(04)
9592 1994 (01)
9592 3996(04 )
1 2 /01/96
12 /01/9 2
1 1/0 1 /96
11/01/96
11/ 37 /96
06/10/94
07/11 194
09/29/94
91/10/94
0 3/22/94
09/13/94
10/07/93
10/13/93
04/05/90
09/24/9)
07/2E/9 3
02/06/94
04/00/94
09/2B/94
09/25/95
11/01/9)
07/22/94
09 /27/93
01/12/94
01/29/91
11/17/93
06/09/94
0 1/10/94
08/14/96
9495 1990(023 08/01/90
9494 1996(05) 04/11/96
9494 1986(04) 04/11/86
9494 1996(01) 02/09/96
9495 1999 (01) 05/15/99
9494 1996(02) 03/19/86
ProceEsor RequiceiienIE
‘COOLDANT RECYCLING AND USED OIL PROCESS 1MG
‘RECYCLING PRESUMPTION UNDER PART 279
APPLICABILITY OF 40 CFR PART 279 TO ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGSRS EPAS USED OI l. PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS
UE9d Oil FIltere
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED OIL FILTERS
9441 1992(35) 10/33/92
Manageosnl Standards
‘REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR CFC-CONTAI4INATED USED OIL
‘REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL
‘RECYCLING PRESUMPTION UNDER PART 279
‘STATE AUTHORIZATION AND USED OIL RECYCLED THROUGH SONS OTHER MEANS THAN BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
APPLICABILITY OF 40 CFR PART 279 TO ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL
APPLICABILITY OF FART 279 USED OIL MAIR&GD4INT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE FLENT SIRVIC1NG OPERATION
APPS tCABILIDI or RCEA USED OIL RRDULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPL1 MItES
APPLICABILITY OF USED OiL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORSENT MATERIALS
CLARIFICATION OF 910W PROVISIONS IN CRRCLA APPLY TO SERVICS STATiON DEALEES’ THAT HANDLE USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OP RSCYCLEI) USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY I t WASTEWATER TREATI4ENT ACTIVITIES
CLARIFICATION OF THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION PROVISiONS CONTAINED 1H THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY PERTAIN TO IGNITABLE USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OF THE USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AND HOW THEY APPLY TO USED OIL CONTAMINATED WITH HCFCE
CLARIFICATION OF THE USED OIL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTE
CLARIFICATION OF USED 011. MANAGEI4ENT STANDARDS PERTAINiNG TO USED OiL GENERATED AND MANAGED ON-SITE
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USED OIL BEING BURNED IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILER
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL RULES AS THEY APPLY TO DO-IT-YOURSELF OIL CHANGERS
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE ‘REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
INTERPRETATION OF THE REGULATORY EXEMPTION FOR EURNINO USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS
RECYCLED USED OIL PROCESSING STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO ON-SITE RECYCLING OF USED O 1L RECOVERED FROM A NASTENATER TREATHENT SYSTEM
REGULATION OP SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (RIDER THE SEPTEN8ER II • 1991 RECYCLED USED OIL NJ.JIAODIDNT STANDARDS
REOULATOWE STATUS All) MANAO NT OP DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERARLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS All) WIPERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF AND PROPER DISPOSAL METHODS FOR HYDRAULIC FLUID FILTERS USED IN AIRCRAFTS
REGULATORY STATUS DF HYDRAULIC FLUIDS AND HEAT TRANSFER FLUIDS
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED CUTTING OILS AND USED OIL COATED STEEL TURNINGS GENERATED DURING MACHINING OPERATIONS
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL
USE OP ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR 92 FUEL OIL IN MANUFACIURIND ANFO BLASTING AGENTS
USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO MATERIALS CONTAI4ISIATEO WITH USED OIL AND PROVIDE LITTLE OR NO ENERGY WNEN EURNED
9592 1996(05)
9592 1996(061
9592 1996 (081
9592 1995(01)
11/01/16
11/01/96
11/27/96
06/10/95
Waste 011
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
9441 1992(36 ) 10/29/92

-------
07 /06 19 8 KEYWORD INDEX RS NO. 256
USED CII. FILTERS
(See Used Oil) REEF / I
VARIANtS
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions) RASP / /
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS VARIANCES 9551.1986( 19) 10/01/88
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TAMES 9483 1906(00) 10/01186
•SOLID WASTE VARIANCE FOR SPENT 501.v&4 9433.1905(0)) 09/01/85
•VARIANCE FROM A TREAThENT STANDARD 94)3 1986424) 12/01/86
•VAR!ANCES TO SAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOIIINS 9551 1906422) u/al/aG
BOILER VARIANCE FOR A WASTE NEAT RECOVERY BOILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF 9433 1987402) 01/07/67
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION 9469.1990101) 00/30/90
COWOCO PART S PERMITS 9S53.1990(0ll 05/11/90
CONTAMINATED 5011, AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATASILITY VARIANCE 9551 19901051 10/09 190
DETER)4INAT7ON WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED 70 A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE 9441 1995(241 06/30/95
GROUNDWATER ImNITORING VARIANCE REQUZREMENT5 9461 1905103) 10/20/05
KOO I . P093, AND 0059 CONTAI4INATED SOIL TRKAI74EPFI’ STANDARDS 9994 1990(09) 08/13/90
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETRDPITTINO VARIANCES 9404 1906(04 1 04/21106
PERI4ITTENG AND LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS POE MANAGEMENT OP COIFI’AMIWATR_D SOIL WHICH IS HAZARDOUS DR CONTAINS HAZARDOUS WASTE 9551 1996404) 11/27/96
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL 9441 1990415) 06/24/90
RESPONSE 70 A REQUEST FOR AN AEMINIETRA2’JVR STAY OP A TREATABIL3TY VARIANCE 9554 19931031 03/21/97
SECONDARI LEAD SMELTER VARIANCE_S 9444.1966414) 00/26/80
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (154 RETROFiTTING WAIVER REQUEST (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL) 9404 1,967(07) 07/14/07
USE OF SITE .SPECIF IC LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TREATABILITY VARIANCE DURING CLEANUPS 9SS4 2991 (01) 01/00/97
VARIANCES PROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLiD WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260 31(b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS 9433 1594 (021 11/15/94
WASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL RaIDVED 9441 1957 153) 06/29/01
VNS WODEL
(See Groundwater Monitoring, Delietirig) EREF / /
VOIANFTARY CLEA3AIPS
(See Corrective ACtion) RRRP / I
WASTE ANALYSIS
(See ploD Analytic Methods, SW-US) RREF / /
•PN TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE 9443 19034031 02/01/91
•HASTE ANALYSIS FOR SIMPLE STORAGE AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES 9472 ,19031011 01/01/03
•WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN 9472 1905 4022 03/01/05
ASTR STANDARDS iN ‘THE RCRA PRCOPJ.34 9445 1967(05) 12/21/67
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 9476,1967(034 12/11/87
G RAT0R USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS III LIEU Of THE EP OR ‘PCLP TESTS 9451,1966 1031 14/28/H
LABORATORY EVAUIAT2ON PROGRAM 9472 1564 (02) 01/29/80
LIQUID WASTE, DEFINITION OF 9432 2981101) 06/25/81
METI400S 1310 AND 1130. EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE 9443 1987114) 00/1,1/07
RCRA TESTING TECHNIQUES 9445.1987(03) 10/20/87
*16-046 POE REQU 1RED WASTE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO 264 13 AND 255 13 9472.1905101) 05/30/05
SW-US, THIRD EDITION, HOLDING TINES FOR SEMIVOLATILES 9445 1,907(051 06/30/57
7’CLP IN TNR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM 9443 1901(29) 11/18/07
TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE SAMPLE 9443 1987(33 I 12/3 1 107
USE OF ThE METHOD OF STANDARD EDITIONS 9461 1907(t21 06/ 13187
WASTE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS IN INCOMING WASTE SHIPMENTS - LOR 9551 1987(10) 06/12/87

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 157
WASTE BURNING
(See Incineratson)
WASTE EXCHANGE PROGRAM
(See Neat. MsnlnIzat ion)
WASTE MINIMIZATION
(See also Generators. NSWA• Manifest)
•RCRA WASTS MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS
•WASTE MINIMIZATION
•WASTE MINIM I SAT 1ON I S) RECYCLING ACTIVIflES TEAT RESEMBLE cGNVENTIGEAI. WASTE MfrKAGZICNT PRACTICE
WASTE MINIMIZXTION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
•WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUiREMENTS
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENRRATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
IMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MIN1MIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO’S KNILONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGUlaT IONS
MANIFEST CERTIFICATION SIGNATURE BLOCX FOR D(PLOYESS SIGNING FOR GENERATING COMPANY
MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
ON-SITS RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS RY GENERATORS
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATHENT UNIT-EFFECT GM ww EXEMPTION
SOURCE REDUCTION
SIJPO6ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM IPAT) COIII4SNTS
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTI FICATIOII RRQUIREME1FTR
WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3002(b) OF RCRA FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE D iSPOSAL FACILITIES
WASTE MINIMIZATION - PERMIT CERTIFICATION All) JOINT PERMITTING
WASTE OIL
(See Used 0 11) (See also Nazerdoua Neat e Identilicetioni AREF
WASTE PILES
(See Land Diepoeel Factlitseap KEEP
WASTE STREAM
XREF
•LP.ND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CORROSIVE WASTE 9551 1981(19) 09/bl/87
•TREATMSNT CAPACITY 9525 1956(01) 12101/86
EPA’S IITTERPRRTAT ION OP ‘1111 EXEMPTION IN 40 CFR 261 1 1a1 (7I(wI (F ) . A NEW SECTION GF EPA’S REGULATIONS ON CARBAMATE LISTING RULE 9441 1995) 25) 02101/95
IMMERSION PLATING WASTEWATERS-ERONIR PLATING 9412 1980)01) 10101/RI
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION 9551 1990(06) 10/14/90
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS 9441 1911(48 1 06/17/el
MIXTURES OP LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES 9441 1921(68) 00/19/81
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK 01511 ANALYSES 9441 1984(25) 01/26/16
SOLVENT AND CW94RRCIAL CNW4ICAL PRODUCT WASTE STREAMS 9444 1989(031 06/28/89
WASTE-AS- FUEL
KEEP / /
XREF F F
KEEP / /
9561 1995(01) 06/11/95
9411 1985(01) 10/Il/IS
9561 1994( 12) 07 101/94
9411 1987(02) 06/01/07
9411 1987(01) 06/01/27
9451 1986(01) 03/11/86
9113 1994(011 01/10/94
9452 1985 1021 10/17/85
9452 1916102) 10/20/86
9441 1986(21) 12/13/86
9432 1926101) 01/06/86
9454 19071011 07/21107
9523 00-12 03/30/87
9452 1906(03) 02/06/86
9452 1986101? 04/28/86
9561 1994601) 07/18/94
9960 1181(01) 09/ 11/SI
/ /
I /
(See Nazardoue Walt . Fuela)
18SF / /

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 155
WASTE DERI WED FUEL
(See Hazardous Waste Fuels) SEEP
WASTEWATER
(See also Clean Water Act. Listed Hazardous Waste. Land Disposal Restrictions. H lzure Ru le)
‘BOAT FOR WASTEWATER
‘MIXTURE RULE . D (SCIIAXGES TO WASTEWATER
ACts PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP • INSTITUTE. WV COMMENTS ON
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAl. PRACTICES
CARBON REGENERATION FACLLITY. MIXTURE OP SOLID MID HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON)
DISCARDED WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULAT1ON PROWS IONS
HAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS USED AS QUENCNWATER IN CEMENT PRODUCTION
I.AND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AI4OIIIITS OF SOLVENT
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR THICHENFE TREATHENT TRAIN AND TIlE MIXTUeP RUI.E
SLUIIGR DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TEEATMFJ1r UNIT-EFFECT Ull WWTU RXFMPTI(IN
SOLVENT LISTINGS• SCOPE OF
SOLVSNT-CONTAI4INATED WASTESTREAJ4S FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
SOLVEIIT-CONTAI4I1IATED WASTEWATEE FROM FRASRAIICE MANUFACTURE
TAME TREP.fl4ENT PROCESSES
WASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METNYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT HAlTER
WASTEWATEES EXCLUSION PROM THE DEFINITION OP F02 1 FOR PCP MAIIUPACTURR
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES PEON
Discharge
APPLICABILiTY OF RCRA REGULATiONS TO A HYDRD-MIST UNIT USED IN TIlE TEEAITIENT OF WASTEWATER AT 0EV-CLEANING FACILITIES 9431 1994(01 1 06/02/94
APPLICANILITY OF THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION IN VARiOUS SITUATIONS 9442 1997101) 03/10/97
EPAS INTFRPEETATION OF THE E IEMPTION IN ID CFR 261 3 1a) (2)(iv)(F). A NEW SECTION OF EPAE EEGULATIOIJE ON CARRAMATE LISTING RULE 9441 1995(25) 09 101/95
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE 94411995(051 02/17/95
NPDES Facilities
‘APPLICAEII.ITY OF TIlE SECTION 261 44.) (21 EXCLUSIONS
‘TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTSWATER FOR PIIEPOSES OF SECTION 361 31a) 121 (iv) (A)
EXEMPTION FROM PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT UNITS
LEAkS. SPILLS• AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OP LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
ACRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON BENEENE STRIPPERS AT NRC REFINERY
It RULE NAEARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
P0TH
APPLICABILITY OP THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOE RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSAELR AND LAUNOIRABLE INDUSTRI AL RAGE AND WIPERS
TRUCE OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A Pane
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS
Sewage Sludge
APPLICABILITY OF THE DOMESTiC SEWAGE EXCLUSION IN VARIOUS SITUATIONS
DOMESTIC SEWAGE SLUDGE EXCLUSION
REGUI.ATORT STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND I.AUNDERAELE INDUSTE IAL RAGS MID WIPERS
9441 .1997 (84) 10/01/87
9441 19911131 07/01/91
9522 1992(01) 01/16/92
9441 .1986 107) 01/23/B c
9471.1909(01) 03/20/59
9489 1992 (02) 01/27/97
9441 19911121 07/31/91
/ /
/ /
17/01/86
12/01/87
06/19/87
04 /2 6/89
04/23/86
11/26/91
12/10/87
02/15/91
12/10/87
10 /26/87
04/24/86
01,06/Bc
1 1/07/06
12/06/88
10/26/87
09/15/90
10/21/66
07 /02/86
09/02/El
04 /07/8 6
SEEP
9432. 19B6 116)
9522.1901(02)
9491. 1987 (04)
9442 1919 104)
9441 1906(33)
9444 1991(051
9441 19B7(96)
9499.1991(01)
9453 1907(09)
9444.1907(49)
4433. 19 56(11)
9412 1986(01)
9444 1906(261
9441 1988(49)
9442 1907(06)
9483 1990(02)
9444 1996(23)
9441 1906(52)
9444 19071)9)
9411 1996(28)
9442 1997 (01) 03/10/97
9451 1956)01) 03/37/88
9441 1906173) 09/25/86
9441 1986(941 12/19/96
9574 1990(01) 11/29/90
9441 1993 (19) 09/27/93
9441 1906188) 21/30/86
9442 1986(07) 07/02/86
9442.1997(0)) 01/10/97
9441 .1990 (02) 02/12/90
9441 1993 (19) 09/27/93

-------
07/06/98
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No 199
RESIDUALS GENERATED BY PROCESS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE TREATMENT
Sludge
•AIR EMISSIONS PROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
API SEPARATOR WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE
FDl9 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
•SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF
CHEMICAL COWERS ION OF ALUMINUM AND WHETHER WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE GENERATED IS CONSIDERED AN P019 HAZARDOUS WASTE
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED IN PHOTO PROCESSING
CLASSIFICATION CF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED •EINC-COEALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL PROCESS
P019 LISTING AND l ifE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS . STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM
INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS UNDER RCRA REGULATIONS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR A HAZARDOUS CORROS1VE WASTEWATER
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS • PERMITTING COVERAGE OF
REGULATORY STATUS OF RN ION EXCHANGE RES IN WASTE
REGULATORY STATUS OF NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEING RECYCLED
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTRWATRR TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PI IOSPHATING OF ALUMINUM CANS
REINTERPRETATION OF THE PODS LISTING
SU)O4ARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) CWQ4ENTS
TOTALLY ENCLOSSD TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
9442 1958(015 02/10188
9442 1997103) 06/01/97
9444 5984(05) 04/01/84
9441 1989 153) 19/01/89
9441 1986 (59) 06/01/86
9444 1996(01) 08/30/96
9441 199S (26) 08/04/95
9441 2994 (20) 08/02/94
9444 2987(22) 06/24/81
9441. 1988(501 11/07/RI
9441 1994(26 ) 10/05/94
9S51 1997(04) 05/01/91
9502 1984 (01) 12/01/84
9441 1997101) 01 121./91
9441 1994(17) 06/10/94
9442 1989(01) 01/01/89
9444 1986(19 ) 09/25/86
9523 00-12 03/30/81
9432 00-1 02/11/86
9441 1987 (61) 08/12/81
9441 1987(84)
9441 1996(06)
9441 1989 (S3(
9432 1984 (04)
9432 1987 (05)
9432 1995 (01)
9432 1988 (03)
9432 1988 (05)
9483 1988(19)
9441 1992(18)
9441 1984(14)
9431 1994(01)
9491 1996(08)
9444 1996(01)
9441 1996(11)
9441 1996(09)
9444 1987(22)
9433 1987(50)
9441 1994(16)
9551 1990(06)
9441 1991(01)
9441 1984(25)
9471 1989(01)
9522 1988(04)
9S03 92- lA
9473 1988(04)
9441 1985(29)
9483 1990(03)
9503 S I-lA
9443 1994(14 )
9441 1994(27)
9441 1993)21)
9441 1994)175
10/01/87
05/01/96
10/01/89
OS/01/84
06 /0 1/87
02/01/95
03/01/88
10/01/88
07 /0 1/88
06 /01/92
05 /0 1/84
06/02/94
09/23/96
08 /30/96
11/13/96
10/01/96
06/24/87
06/12/87
06/10/94
10/14/90
01/03/91
12/07/84
03 /2 0/89
11/02/68
01/02/86
10/27/88
08/23/85
09/20/90
12/24/85
07/12/94
10/04/94
11/01/93
0 5/10/94
Wastewater Treatment
APPLICASILITY OF THE SECTION 261 4 (a) (2) EXCLUSIONS
•EXCLUSIGO1 OP LASORATORY WASTES FROM THE MIXTURE RULE
•F019 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATRR TREATMENT SLUDGHS
FILTER PRESS iN WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT. EXCLUSION FOR
•MOEILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
•STATUS OF WWTU8/ENUS AT GENERATOR SITES
‘TA3IX WASTEVATSR TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS
•WASTEWATRR TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK
•NASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE
flERO DISCHARGE AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. RCRA EXCLUSI oN. CWA APPLIES
APPLICA81LITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A NYDRO-HIST UNIT USED IN THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO CHEMICAL FLOCCULATION UNITS WHEN USED TO TREAT WASH WATER FROM AIRCRAFT ENG1NES
CHEMICAL CONVERSION OF ALU)4INIJ)4 AND WHETHER WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE GENERATED IS CONSIDERED AN F019 NAZARDOUS WASTE
DEFINITION OF SOLID WthTE ISSUES RELATED TO CLEANUP OF CULPEPER WGOO PROCESSING FACILITY
EXEMPTION FOR LIME STABILIZED PICRLE LIQUOR SLUDGE GENERATED DY THE IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY
P019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OP CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING
INTERPRETATION OF THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY NW SYSTEMS-RI49 WASTE
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTIONS
PERMIT- EXEMPT STATUS OP SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREATMENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, M1XYURS AND DERIVED- PROM RULES
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUE
ROW PERMIT FOR A SLUDGS DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PHOTORESIST SOLI0S )“SEINS’) GENERATED IN THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TWD WASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE BILAYSRED THROUDN PEASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TSDF
REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION FLOAT STORAGE TAME USED TO PEED MATERIAL INTO A PETROLEUM CORER
REGULATORY STATUS OP NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEING RECYCLED

-------
07/06/90 KEYWORD Page No 160
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITS AT DRY CLEANERS 9471 1993 (01) 06/02/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND THE USE OF SEPARATOR WATER EVAPORATORS AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES 9432 1993(02) 10/22/93
REGULATORY STATUS OF NASTEWATSR TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PROSPHATING OP ALUMINUM CANS 9442 .1969)01) 01/01/69
RESOLUTION OF RCRA ISSUES RELATING TO THE WOOD PRESERVING INDUSTRY 9451 1996)03) 05/01/96
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM B iOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS 9441 1965)08) 02/2 2/85
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT 9527 1981)02) 00/03/07
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT 9432.1987(00) 06/03/el
SLUDGE DEHYDRATIDN EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY 9522 1906(02) 03/07/80
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT OH WWTU EXEMPTION 9432 1986(01) 01/06/86
TANK RULES APPLIED TO WWT UNITS AND DISTRIEUTION SY5TDIS 9483 1986)09) 11/28/86
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SNIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF 9441 ,1986(14) 02/25/86
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 9441 1906(62) 00/19/86
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTIlIZER 9441 1986(80) 10/20/06
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS EXEMPTION 9471 1987(02) 12/21/87
WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE KOOl AND P006 WASTEWATER THEATMINT SLUDGE 1984(10) 07/25/84
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OP ALUMINUM 9441 1986(29) 04/09/06
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACNLGROPNENOL 1984(04) 04/26/84
WASTENATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL RO’II’OMS IN 9441 1985(43) 12/17/85
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION 9431 1989 (02) 09/26/89
WASTENATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION/DEFINITION 9432 1984(07) 12/24/04
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS ARE NOT DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND MAY NOT RECEIVE OFF-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTES 9452 1987 (01) 02/24/07
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
(See Waatewater) XREF / /
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
(See L Isted Nazardouo Waite) XREP / /
WELL CONSTRUCTION
(See Groundwater Monitoring) REEF / /
WITNI3RAWALS
(See Permit Application) RREF / /
WOOD PRESERVING
(See Wood Treetnent) XREP / /
WOOD TREATMENT
(See atao Listed Hazardous Waste) RREF / /
Creosote
•RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS REGULATORY STATUS 9444 1992(07) 11/01 /92
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES. DISPOSAL OF. FIFRA INTERFACE 9441 1905 (20) 07/16/05
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS-TIES DISPOSAL 9441 1990(20) 07/03/90
KO3S LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM RIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS 9444 1987(52) 12/11/87
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE, SHALL QUANTITY GENERATOR 9441 1980(04) 11/17/80
REGULATORY STATUS OF VARIOUS TYPES OP PENTACNLOROPNENOL WASTES 9444 1967(29) 06/19/87
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9441 1906(20) 04/07/06
WOOD TREATED WI n) CREOSOTE. DISPOSAL OF 9441 1986(10) 02/11/06

-------
0 7 /06/ 96 EEYWOP.D INDEX Page lID. 161
WooO Pn.ervtng
‘REClAIMED SPE lt? WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261 4(a)(9 1 9441.1991 1191 12/01/91
•IWUSED FOR?4ULAVIOES CONTAIHIWO EODIIPI PERTACNLOROPHSEATE ARE 9027 9644 1994 )05 ) 06/01/91
‘WOOD PRESERVING WASTES Aa4INGSTEATIVB STAT 9689 1992(03 ) 06/02/92
CCA TREATED WOOS WHEN DISPOSED 9441 1991(11 1 06/28/91
CLARIFICATION OF HAEAEDOUS WASTE LISTiNGS PERTAINING 70 WOOD PRESERVING OPERATIONS 9444.1992 100 12/11/92
CLARITICAT1OII OP REQUTRW4ERFS INVOLVING TILE COUNTiNG OP WOOD PRESERVING WATERS FOR RIRIINIAL. REPORTING 9492 1996101) 06/04,96
CLOSURE ISSUES RELATED TO WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS 9476 1984404) 08/07/84
DEFiNITION OF SOLID WASTE iSSUES RELATED TO CLEANUP OF CULPEPEE WOOD PROCESSING FACILITY 9441 1996111) 11/13/96
DIORIII IN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACI6I.OROPHENOL 9444 1985402) 03/04/65
DR1PPAGI IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS 9489 1991102) 05/11/92
F027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING 9444 1997 110) 04/09/67
COOl -LISTED WASTES PEON WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES 9445.1983)09) 01/18/69
PENTACHLOROPNENOL AS A WOOD PRESERVATIVE 9144.1968 119) 06/29/68
REGULATORY STATUS OP RAINWATER IN WOOD PRESERVING PROCESS AREAS 9441 19941031 02116/N
E03ULAIOET STAVUS OP VARIOUS TYPES OF PSNTACNLCROPNENOL WASTES 9444 1997 )29) 06/ 2 9/fl
REGULATORY STATUS OP WOOD ETICI IERS USED FOR 11000 PRESERVING OPERATIONS 9442 1994 (04) 04/06/94
RESOLUTION OP ECRA ISSUES RELATING TO TIlE WOOD PRESERVING 1NDUSTRY 9451.1996403) 05/01/96
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIRERENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAII0IE6IT OP WOOD PRESERVING WASTES 9554 19901)5) 09/26/90
TREAT1IRIP ? SURFACE IMPOUNWIUTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVA1LASLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS 9464 1967(32) 11/29/67
WASTENATEE TREATMENT EPPLUE1IT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE Roll AND P006 WA8TRWATER TREATMENT SLIJDOE 9414 1984410) 07/25/64
WASTEWATEE TREATMENT SL000ES PROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACIILOROPNEIIOL 9444 1964104) 04/26/64
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES. CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM 9641 1966426) 04/07/66
WOOD TREATED WITh CREOSOTE. DISPOSAL OF 9641 1966110) 02/11/96
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SIJMPS 9441 1996(49) 09/12/86
WOOD TREATMENT PLANT DRIP AREAS AS SWI4U 9. REGULATION OP 9502 1965(02) 06/17/65
ZINC PLATING
IEee Electroplating) EEEF / /

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Volume 4
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 4

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
9441.1997(01)
i O
4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
‘tpgOlF
2 I !991
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. James T. Dufour
Attorney and Counselor at Law
819 F Street
Sacramento, California 95814
Dear Mr. Dufour:
Thank you for your letter of December 24, 1996, in which you
inquired about the regulatory status of your client’s ion
exchange resin waste. Specifically, you wished to know if this
ion exchange resin waste used in the treatment of electroplating
rinsewaters is classified as EPA Razardous Waste No. F006
(wastewater treatment sludge from electroplating operations).
In your description of your client’s process, you state that
your client performs electroplating operations. Rinsewaters from
these operations are sent Co the ion exchange fiiter in question,
which produces ‘u1trapure water for use in the e3 .ec:roplatizig
operation.” You state that the water is reused in the process,
and discharged, but if the water were to be discharged, it
already meets Clean Water Act discharge requirements for the
local Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW).
En previous regulatory interpretation letters, the Agency
has stated that such ion exchange resins are classified as F006
wastes. The letters you cite (letter to Compliance Recycling
Industries dated May 5, 1987 and letter tot.T.S. ilter Recovery
Services dated July 21, 1994) both state the 40 CFR 260.10
definition of sludge as “any solid, semisolid, or liquid waste
generated from municipal, commercial, or industrial wascewater
treatment plant, water supply treatment, or air pollution contrc.
facility, exclusive of the treated effluent from a wastewater
treatment plant.u In both letters, ion exchange resin is
cla si fied as an F006 waste even though the purified water can be
recycled to the process. In your case, the definition of a
sludge is, again, tied to the, type of unit in which the waste was

-------
generated, so the Agency interpretation is unchanged. The fact
that, as you otate, the ion exchange resin is not necessary to
remove hazardous constituents before discharge does not affect
this interpretation.
Please be aware that under Section 3006 of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA, 42 U.S.C. Section 6926)
individual States can be authorized to administer and enforce
their own hazardous waste programs in lieu of the Federal
program. When States are not authorized to administer their own
program, the appropriate EPA Regional office administers the
program and is the appropriate contact for any case-specific
determinations. Please also note that under Section 3009 of RCR.A
(42 U .S.C. Section 6929) States retain authority to promulgate
regulatory requirements that are more stringent than Federal
regulatory requirements. Pursuant to 40 CFR 260.20 and 260.22,
you may petition to have your client’s waste delisted if you
think it poses no threat to human health and the environment.
Thank you for you inquiry. If you have any further
questions or comments, please contact Mr. Ron Josephson of my
staff at (703)308-8890.
Sincerely,
‘-I
J _ _? i
David Bussard, Director
Hazardous Waste Identificaticn•
Division
2

-------
f
__JAMES T. DUFOUR
Attorney and Counselor at L 4
J.n... T I) f,,,,, 1) R F A . r ii i $P) F Siren
______________________________________ Sarrsmni ii.. I ‘)aN 14
December 24. 1996
.lInitn.,inI ,rr & l...ipIn..n. U law . 191 1 1 , 11
l nnn.nn rniat & fl.SI I %. R..,jgt,n,. 1 \ C I’) l I , ) .n .j . ,2. ,l)
Mr. David Bussard, Director
U.S. EPA/Office of Solid Waste
Hazardous Waste Identifiration flivisinn.
M/C 5304W
401 M St. Southwest
Washington. D.C. 20460
RE: ION EXCHANGE RESIN CHARACTERIZATION
Dear Mr. Bussard:
The purpose of this letter is to obtain a regulatory interpretation on behalf of an electronics
rnanutbcturing firm client concerning the characterization of ion exchange resins as F006 listed
hazardous wastes %%hcn they arc used for treatment of rinse waters used in an electroplating
process. In the process in question, the electroplating rinsate does not require pollution control
treatment because it does not contain any hazardous constituent which would preclude discharge
untreated to the P01W. Furthermore, it is not discharged but is reused in the process. The
process water stream is treated by the ion exchange resin system solely for the purpose of
producing ultra-pure water for reuse in the electroplating operation. It should be noted that ion
exchange resin systems are commonly used to produce ultra-pure water.
We are aware that EPA has on two occasions characterized ion exchange resins treating
e;ectrup6tiiig solUduns as F006 l ,uardous wastes subject to RCRA baavd un the deflnition uf
sludge in 40 CFR § 260.10 (letter to Compliance Recycling Industries dated May 5, 1987 and
letter to U.S. Filter Recovery Services dated July 21, 1994). A sludge is “any solid semisolid or
liquid waste generated/ram a municipal. commercial or industrial wastewater treatment plant.
waler s upplr treatment plant, or air pollution control facility. exdu.sive of the treated effluent
from a waslewater treatment plant.”
The 1987 letter clearly states that the ion exchange resin which removes metals. chromates. and
cyanide meets the definition of sludge and is therefore an F006 hazardous waste. In the 1994
letter. EPA states that the resin meets the definition of sludge because it qualifies as a pollution
control device as it acts to remove contaminants from wastewaters. These interpretations are
net 4trcp hr

-------
Mr. Bussard
U.S. EPA
December 16. 1996
Page 2
based on the fact that the ion exchange resin is necessary to remove hazardous constituents of
the wastewater before being discharged, therefore defining the resin not only as a pollution
control device, but also a wastewater treatment unit. Ion exchange resin is more commonly used
to produce ultra-pure water than to treat wastewater.
Wastewater treatment unit is defined in 40 CFR § 260.10 to mean a device which:
(I) Is par! of a waste waler treatment facility that is subject 10 regulation under either
section 402 or 30 7(b) of the Clean Water Ac!, and
(2) Receives and treats or stores an influent waste water that is a hazardous waste as
dcjI;;ed j; : 261.3 iftiiis chapz , u, i/nit g rzerai urla’ ucCw;iuiat a
wastewaler treatment .s!udge that is a hazardous waste as defined in § 261.3 of
this chapter. or treats or stores a wastewater treatment sludge that is a hazardous
waste as defined in § 261.3 of this chapter: and
‘3) Meets the definition of tank or tank system in § 260.10 of this chapter
The ion exchange resin in question at our client’s facility is not part of a wastewater treatment
facility subject to the Clean Water Act because the influent electroplating rinsate could be
directly discharged to the POTW before entering the ion exchange resin. Therefore, we believe
that the in fluent water to the subject ion exchange system is not a wastewater and the resulting
treatment sludge should not be subject to the F006 listing. The Agency is advised that the spent
resins do not exhibit any hazardous.characteristics, including exceeding toxicity characteristic
regulatory limits for any metals.
The subject ion exchange resin is necessary to produce an ultra-pure electroplating rinse water to
meet process water requirements in a manufacturing operation. In essence, the ion exchange
resin is a water purifying step in a manufacturing process and not a pollution control device or
wastewater treatment.
In conclusion, since the ion exchange resin for electroplating solutions is utilized solely for the
purpose or meeting inhluent water standards to a maiiuIacturin ptocess and not for removing
hazardous constituents before discharge (hence not pollution control or wastewater treatment). it
is not a wastewater treatment unit and therefore should not be subject to an F006 wastewater
treatment sludge listing.
We would appreciate your interpretation to clarify the characterization of this particular ion
exchange system spent resin. If you have any questions, please contact us at your earliest
convenience.
Very truly yours.
r uu’
JAMES T. DUFOUR ‘ J i w
ncc%dlrcpa lit

-------
%IQ S ? 47
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9441.1997(02)
MAR I 2 1997
OFFtCE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Rick J. Meichiori
Progressive Technologies, Inc.
4050 Westmark Drive
Dubuque, IA 52002
Dear Mr. Melchiori:
Thank you for your letter of November 11, 1996, requesting an interpretation of how the
RCRA regulations apply to waste generated from the removal of paint from painted surfaces
using a surface preparation product developed by Progressive Technologies. You described your
product to members of my staff in a meeting held in November, 1996.
Based on information provided to my staff, your product, PreTox 2000, is applied to the
painted surface and allowed to cure. During the curing process the paint adheres to the PreTox
2000. The coating consisting of a combination of paint and Prelox 2000 is removed using
standard coating removal methods: As you may know, the Agency does not endorse or support
specific processes. It can, however, respond to your request for an interpretation on the general
paint removal process, and the waste generated from your removal process.
In general, hazardous waste regulations apply to materials which first have been determined to
be a solid waste. A solid waste is a hazardous waste if it is listed as a hazardous waste in
Subpart D of 40 CFR, Part 261, or if it exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste as identified
in Subpart C of 40 CFR, part 261. A generator may also use knowledge of the process to
determine whether the waste generated is hazardous. In the case of lead abatement debris, the
waste determination required under 40 CFR 262.1 1 would be made once the paint has been
removed from the surface of the structure. The paint removal proàess itself is not subject to
regulation in this circumstance. Assuming that no other characteristic hazardous constituents are
present in the waste, and that the waste does not exhibit the characteristics of ignitability,
reactivity, or corrosivicy, the TCLP waste analysis for lead would be sufficient to determine if the
waste exhibits the toxicity characteristic.
You indicated that the debris generated from the paint removal process using PreTox 2000
have passed TCLP tests and therefore do not meet the definition of a hazardous waste.

-------
EPA, however, cannot determine whether a waste stream, such as paint removal debris
containing PreTox 2000, is generally exempt from the toxicity characteristic. Each user of the
PreTox 2000 product will be responsible for determining whether his or her paint removal debris
exhibits the toxicity characteristic, although test data you collect could be of assistance to the
users.
Furthermore, please note that wastes must continue to “pass” the TCLP test until the time of.
disposal to escape hazardous waste regulation. In other words, if a batch of paint removal debris
“passes” the test at the time it is initially tested, but is later retested and found to exhibit the
characteristic, it becomes regulated hazardous waste. Also, please be aware that generators may
be held liable under CERCLA for any environmental damages caused by the release of a
hazardous material into the environment CERCLA liability is independent of any hazardous
waste determination that may be made.
Also note that for purposes of hazardous waste generation, the term “generator” may refer to
both the paint abatement contractor and to the owner of a building or a superstructure and they
are considered “co-generators” of the waste. Additionally, state requirements may be more
stringent that the federal requirements for hazardous wastes and you should contact the state or
states in which you intend to conduct lead paint abatement activities to determine whether
additional requirements apply.
[ hope this information is helpful. Should you have additional questions, please contact Ann
Codrington or Rajani Joglekar of my staff at (703) 308-8825 or (703) 308-8806, respectively.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
I —
C,lrtjttL
Progressive Technologies, Inc.
4050 Westmadc Drive
Dubuque. IA 52002
319-589-7008
Fa c 319-589-1237
November 11, 1996
Mr. Michael Shapiro recelyec
Director I / //i 9 I _ t
Division of Solid Waste Management
MIS: 5304W
401 MScieetSW
Washington D C., 20460
Dear Mr Shapiro.
Progressive Technologies, Inc. is working to develop and patent a process designed to eliminate the generation
of hazardous wastes during the abatement of coatings cont rining hazardous constituents. The objective of this
correspondence is to obtain a written determination from the Environmental Protection Agency regarding any
applicable statutes, rules, orders, or regulations pertaining to the permitting, treatment, handling, and disposal
of wastes generated while using this patent applied for process under Section 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations
Bnef]y, the process proposed involves the application of a Portland Cement based surface preparation product,
called PreTox 2000, prior to the removal bf the underlying coating. After su cient curing both the applied and
underlying coatings are removed by one of the standard industiy methods. Most standard coating removal
methods will work with this product. Upon collection and testing of the generated wastes for leachability under
the TCLP testing procedures, the laboratory analyses show leachability levels consistently below the RCRA
hazardous wastes thresholds. In pilot testing of PreTox 2000, the wastes generated have passed ten consecutive
TCLP tests. Based upon the application and removal process and the fact that the wastes generated are not
hazardous in accordance with the RCRA requirements, Progressive Technologies, Inc. believes that the hazardous
waste treatment, handling, and disposal regulations of 40 CFR are not applicable.
As Environmental Protection Agency review and determination of applicable regulations is very important to both
the process developers and end users, a written determination from your Agency will ensure that proper
permitting, handling, and disposal regulations are followed.
If Progressive Technologies, Inc. can provide you with additional information or answer any questions you may
have, please feel free to contact meat (561)234-0203 or Mr. Tom Rolle at (319)589-7008.
csw / 57
,;;i 7 , 1 ( ’/r ;

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
flU COPY
s7 q .
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTiON AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9441.1997(03)
% p 1 101
APR I I 97
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
Mr. James E. Thomas Jr. RESPONSE
Jetco, Inc.
P.O. Box 11494
Memphis, TN 38111
Dear Mr. Thomas:
This is in response to your letters of October 14, 1996 and Dec 3, 1996 to Michael
Shapiro. I apologize for the delay in our reply. Your questions concern the regulatory provisions
under the federal 1i ,ardous waste regulations that apply to the remixing of paint and coatings
that have separated in the container, and to the establishment of collection sites for empty paint
cans.
First,! would like to commend you for your efforts to develop a technology that allows
materials that migid otherwise become wastes to be used as effective products as well as your
efforts to minimize the failure of coatings which can result in unnecessary generation of waste
and the need th use new replacement materials. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
en,courages pollution prevention and the use of technologies that minimize waste generation.
Based on clarification provided to Kristina Meson and Ann Codrington of my staff and
your letters, we understand that Jetco proposes to market a unit that remixes paint and coatings
that have separated in the container due to age. The unit potentially may be purchased by
hardware stores and other retailers who will encourage the public to bring in paint for remixing.
You also propose to establish a system to collect paint cans that have been emptied according to
the provisions at 40 Code of Federal Regulations 261.7 for future recycling as scrap metal. You
ask that we clarify whether h rdous waste regulations apply to the owner or operator of a
locatiOn that collects empty paint cans destined for recycling and whether regulations apply to
the storage and transportation of the cans.
Hazardous Waste Determination
Paint that is to be remixed using the Jetco unit and is to be used for its intended purpose
(e.g., as a paint or coating) regardless of its age or condition before re-mixing is not considered a
solid waste and therefore cannot be a b rdous waste, and the h ,ardous waste regulations do
not apply. Howeveir if the paint must be discarded, it would be considered a waste and the
generator must make a hazardous waste determination and comply with any applicable
I
• P,ln1e with Veoetabte Od eased InI on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Posl00nsumer)

-------
requirements.
In general ha ’ rdous waste regulations apply to materials which are first determined to be
solid wastes. A solid waste is a hazardous waste if it is listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart D
of 40 CFR Part 261, or if it exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste as identified in Subpart C
of 40 CFR, Part 261. A generator may test the waste or use knowledge of the process (or the
material) to determine whether the waste generated is h rdous. It is the responsibility of the
generator of the paint waste to determine whether the waste is hazardous.
Discarded paints generally are not found on EPA’s “Lists of Hazardous Wastes” found at
Subpart D of 40 CFR part 261. However, discarded paints are considered hazardous waste if
they exhibit a characteristic described at 40 CFR 262 Subpart C. Paint wastes may exhibit
characteristics such as Igthtability or Toxicity described at 40 CFR § 262.2I and 261 24. Paint
that is considered hzi, rdous waste and that is generated by a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (see definition below) is not subject to federal regulation under Parts 262 through 266,
268,270 and other applicable provisions, if the waste is discarded in a facility which meets the
criteria of 40 CFR § 26l.5(f) and/or(g). States however, may impose more stringent
requirements than the federal regulations and therefore must be contacted to determine what
requirements might apply where paint rexnixing operations are to occur.
Generator Status of Household Waste
Generally, wastes from households are not subject to hazardous waste regulation. If the
remixing process is not successful, homeowners may discard the paint themselves, or the paint
may be discarded at the business since household wastes are excluded from the definition of
solid waste at 40 CFR 261.4(b). Therefore, the hazardous waste regulations do not apply to
household waste, including household waste that has been collected, transported, stored, treated,
disposed, recovered (e.g., refuse derived fuel) or reused. “Household waste” means any material
including garbage, trash and sanitary residues in septic tanks) derived from households
(including single and multiple residences, hotels, and motels, bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew
quarters, campgrounds, picnic grounds and day-use recreation areas). Therefore, if the waste
comes from a household, it would not be subject to thç hazardous waste regulations even if it
wete later discarded on the premises of a business.
Regulated Generators
If however, the paint is brought in by generators other than household generators (i.e., a
2

-------
conditionally exempt small quantity generator’, a small-quantity generator 2 or a large quantity
generator 3 ), and the waste must be discarded (e.g., because the remixing process was not
successful), paint that is h ardous waste would be subject to regulations and could not be
discarded at the premises of the business unless the business is a permitted treatment, storage, or
disposal facility licenced to accept such wastes. Household waste which is mixed with
h2,’ardous waste from regulated generators would also be regulated.
Collection Program
With respect to establishing a collection facility for empty paint cans, the Agency
clarified its regulations pertaining to h rdous waste remaining in “empty” containers in a
Federal Register notice published on November 25,1980 (see 45 FR 78524). We have enclosed
a copy of this Federal Register notice for your convenience. In this Federal Register Notice,
EPA explained that “except where the hn 7ardous waste is an acutely 1u i ardous material listed in
§261.33(e), the small amount of hazardous waste residue that remains in individual empty, [ as
described in 40 CFR 261.7] unrinsedcontainers does not pose a substantial hazard to human
health and the etivironment.” The Agency also states in the November 25, 1980 Federal
Register notice that “What should be clear from §261.7, however is that no “empty” containers
are subject to regulatory control because no “empty” containers hold residues that are considered.
hazardous wastes for regulatory purposes.”(45 FR 78525, November 25, 1980)
The definition of an “empty” container is found at4O CFR 261.7(b)(1)(i), which
describes a container as empty if:
(i) all wastes have been removed that can be removed using the practices
commonly employed to remove materials from that type of container, e.g..
pouring, pumping, and aspirating, and
(ii) No more than 2.5 centimeters (one inch) of residue remain on the bottom of
the container or inner liüer, or
‘A generator is a conditionally exempt small quantity generator in a calendar month if he
generates no more than 100 kilograms of hazardous waste and no more than 1 kilogram per
month if the waste is an acute h ,swdous waste listed in 40 CFR parts 261.31,261.31, or
261.33(e). A conditionally exempt small quantity generator may not accumulate more than 1000
kilograms at any one time (see 40 CFR 261.5).
2 A small quantity generator is a generator who generates greater than 100 kilograms but
less than 1000 kilograms of hazardous waste in a calendar month and the quantity of waste
accumulated on site never exceeds 6000 kilograms (see 40 CFR 262.34(d)).
3 A large quantity generator is a generator of quantities over 1000 kilograms of h , rdous
waste per calendar month.
3

-------
(iii) (A) No more than 3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the container
remains in the container or inner liner if the container is less than or equal to 110
gallons in size, or
(B) No more than 0.3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the container
remains in the container or inner liner if the container is greater than 110 gallons
in size.
For the purpose of this interpretation, we will rely on the discussion found at 40 CFR
261.7(b) which focuses on containers that have held hazardous wates other than gases and
acutely hazardous materials, because paint wastes most often fall into this category.
The Agency goes on to say in the November 25, 1980 Federal Register notice that “What
should be clear from §26 1.7, however, is that no “empty” containers’are subject to regulatory
control because no “empty” containers hold residues that are considered hazardous wastes for
regulatory purposes.” (45 FR 78525, November 25, 1980)
Therefore, if the paint cans you propose to collect have been emptied in accoi lance with
40 CFR 261.7, the Agency would not consider them subject to regulatory control at the federal
level. Please note that there are additional descriptions of “empty” that apply to containers
holding acute hazardous waste or compressed gas (see 40 CFR 261.7(b)(2) and(3)). Also note
that there may be state or local regulations which govern the collection of containers that have
held paints or other coatings. Please be sure to check with the appropriate state or local agency
for regulations and guidelines applicable to paint cans.
However, if the cans are not emptied according to the provisions at 40 CFR 261.7, they
may be subject to regulatory control if they were received from generators of hazardous waste
other than household generators. Residues remaining in paint cans in quantities above the levels
defined at 40 CFR 261.7, would be regulated as h rdous waste if they meet the defining
criteria of hazardous wastes found at 40 CFR 261 Subparts C and D. In order for a business to
collect such hazardous wastes, it must be a permitted treatment storage or disposal f cility
licensed to accept such waste.
I hope this information is useful. As you are aware, we have not included information
about air or water regulations that may apply to the activities you propose, and we recommend
that you contact the appropriate offices for that appropriate information. Please direct inquiries
to the Director of the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Mr. John S. Seitz, U.S. EPA
- MD- 10, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, and to the Director of the Office of Water and
Drinking Water, Ms. Cynthia C. Dougherty, U.S. EPA - E1209, 401 M Street S.W., Washington
D.C. 20460.
4

-------
Should you have questions or clarifications about this interpretation, please contact Ann
Codrington of my staff at 703-308-8825.
Sincerely,
72 LC
‘, iizabeth Cotsworth, Acting Director
C Office of Solid Waste
Attachments
5

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
3
9441.1997(04)
MAY I 9 1997
The Honorable Mark W. Neumann
United States House of Representatives
Waahington, D.C. 200515-4901
Dear Congressman Neumann
Thank you for your letter of April 18, 1997 regarding your constituent John Cable’s
request for information on h ardous materials, and on rules for disposal of discarded concrete on
land (your file nitinher 100299-JR).
In your letter, you state that Mr. Cable would like to place discarded sweet concrete on
he shores of Lake Michigan for shoreline protection. You also state that Mr. Cable has now
een instructed that this violates EPA regulations on ha ardous materials. Absent any other
information, we assume his concern is about hazardous waste regulations.
Federal ha rdous waste regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) apply to wastes that are either listed as a hwiardous waste or exhibit a characteristic of
hziwdous waste (ignitability, reactivity, corrosivity or toxicity) (see 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Subpart B). Concrete has not been identified by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as a listed h ardous waste. in addition, it is unlikely that common concrete
would exhibit any of the four characteristics of ha,’ardous waste. However, it is the responsibility
of the generator of any waste to make ha ardous waste determinations either by testing the
material or through knowledge of the wastestream (40 CFR § 262.11).
Under Section 3006 of RCRA (42 U.S.C. Section 6926) individual states can be
authorized to administer and enforce their own hazardous waste programs in lieu of the Federal
program. Under Section 3009 of RCRA(42 U.S.C. Section 6929) states retain authority to
promulgate regulatory requirements that are more stringent than Federal regulatory requirements.
In addition, states may have their own rules regarding nonhazardous waste or debris.
- —
flnIQrm$ion nsta e requl n npts. ___
• _,_ _ ___.. ,......tL.4 _... — - —— __ .... . •ss.....s.••e•• •.•...._nn.nu
AML t—f 56 ’ - - . ..(1f?Lt 2 . ....4..n...e..........L ..fl........OSeS .S......eO.eSeS e .e.s...fl S
77 f4 - OFFICIAL F8.E COPY

-------
Therefore, Mr. Cable should contact his state environmental agency for information on state
requirements.
For inforrn ttion on Wisconsin’s h rdous waste rules, Mr. Cable should contact:
Barbara Zellxner, Section Chief
H rdous Waste Management Section
WI Department of Natural Resources
P.O. Box 7921 SW/3
Madison, WI 53707-7921
Phone: (608) 266-2111
Fax: (608) 267-2768
I hope this letter sufficiently responds to your constituent’s concerns regarding the
disposal of discarded concrete. If you need further information, do not hesitate to contact
Kristina Meson of my staff at (703) 308-8488. Agiiiii tIi nk you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
E1i heth A. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
WI$ $WS
— ...... VA. MUD w
Co c at tf)e nitth tate
ou e of 1 .epre cntatibe COUU,TTEEON Tile BUOGET
Lm1jingtan. 3C 20515-4901
April 18, 1997
Ms. Lyrine Ross
Director
Congressional Liaison Division
Environmental Protection Agency
West Tower, Rm.. 835, A-103
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Ms. Ross:
I was recently contacted by a constituent, Mr.
John Cable of Kenosha, Wisconsin, regarding his request
for information on hazardous materials.
As I understand it, Mr. Cable would like
information on an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
rule that classifies concrete as a hazardous material.
In the past, he would place discarded Street concrete
on. the shores of Lake Mi h4gan for shoreline
protection, but he has now been instructed that this
violates EPA regulations on hazardous materials.
I would appreciate it if you would provide me with
any background information you have on this subj ect.
Please address a response to my Washington office, and
reference my file n jmber l00299- Tk. If you have any
questions about this request, John Richardson can be
contacted at (202) 225-3031.
Again, thank you f or your assistance in this
matter..
Sincerely,
Mark W. Neumann
ELXNORr. CFFIC! JAN SVIU.E OF lCE kENOSI4A OffI RACI4I OF CE
CU, H,fl Q . Put.r Plac.. Room 710 6530 Shs,idan Road. RoomS Radii. C.w .i, CoonM .ia.
I Soiui eio.d SIsac, Jan . .vII .. WI 53541 ZhflCII%. Wi 53143 730 S IIaI AVSf1141
£I uoua. WI 53171 11051752—1050 4141654.1001 Raci... WI 13
, 1 1 1 1 137.I5i0

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9441.1997(05)
JUN 3 1991
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Mitchell L. Press
DuPont Engineering
DuPont-Chamber Works (“B”)
EMSS Building
Route 130
Deepwater, NJ 08023
Dear Mr. Press:
This is in response to your June 20, 1996 letter to Mike Shapiro regarding the regulatory
status of the units involved in the on-site recovery of process solvents from I) an agricultural
chemical manufacturing process, and 2) an automotive paint manufacturing process. According to
the descriptions provided in your letter, you believe the two process solvent recovery systems
meet the definition of a closed-loop system as described in 40 CFR 261 .4(a)(8). The issue in the
letter on which you requested clarification was whether the recovered solvents are still exempt if
less than 100% of the product that is recovered is returned to the original process. In the DuPont
scenario, a small percentage, under certain circumstances, cannot be returned to the original
process for chemical reasons and would instead be sold as commercial-grade product.
According to your description of the agricultural chemical manufacturing process, all of’
the ethyl acetate and 80% of the ,cylene recovered will be returned to the original production
process. The recovery system ends up with approximately 20% more xylene than the
manufacturing process can use and this will be sold as commercial-grade product. In regard to
the automotive paint manufacturing process, we understand that, at times, due to process
chemistry and solvent mass balance, adjustments will need to be made to keep acetone at a certain
percentage in the product, which may result in excess recovered solvent that will also be sold as
commercial grade solvent.
The exclusion under §261 .4(a)(8) states that secondary materials that are reclaimed and
returned to the original process or processes in which they are generated where they are reused in
the production process are not solid wastes provided:

-------
• (I) Only tank storage is involved, and the entire process through completion of reclamation
is closed by being entirely connected with pipes or other comparable enclosed means of
conveyance;
• (ii) Reclamation does not involve controlled flame combustion (such as occurs in boilers,
industrial furnaces, or incinerators);
• (iii) The secondary materials are never accumulated in such tanks for over twelve months
without being reclaimed; and
• (iv) The reclaimed material is not used to produce a fuel or used to produce products that
are used in a manner constituting disposal.
In the preamble to the rule promulgating the closed-loop exclusion, EPA clarified that a
requirement of this exclusion is that the reclaimed materials be returned for reuse in the
production process (51 25442; July 14, 1986). The Agency goes on to explain in the
preamble that the term production process is intended to include those activities that tie directly
into the manufacturing operation or those activities that are the primary operation at an
establishment. Because some of the secondary materials cannot be returned to the production
process, the two situations you describe in your letter would not qua1i j for the closed-loop
exclusion. As you are aware, however, under §261 6(c)(1), the recycling process (i.e., your
solvent recovery process) itself is exempt from regulation except as provided in §261 .6(d)( 1).
Furthermore, materials that are reclaimed from solid wastes and that are used beneficially are not
solid wastes under §261 .3(c)(2), unless the reclaimed material is burned for energy recovery or
used in a manner constituting disposal. Therefore, once recovered, your two commercial-grade
products would no longer be considered solid wastes under RCR.A as long as they are used
beneficially.
In addition, please note that authorized states have their own regulations and policies that
may be more stringent than federal regulations and policies. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please call Mary Beth Clary of my staff at (703) 308-1532.
Sincerely,

E1iZabq I Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office &f..Solid Waste

-------
UNiTED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9441.1997(06)
JUL 1
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Peter W. Colby
Colby and Nance LL.P.
1001 G Street, NW, Suite 400 East
Washington, DC 20001
Dear Mr. Colby:
Thank you for your letter to Rick Brandes of January 23, 1997, in which you asked for a
regulatory determination on the status of certain manufacturing wastes. Specifically, you wanted
to know: 1) if warfarin tablets subject to “dissolution testing” are considered hazardous wastes. 2)
iffragmerns from integrity testing of tablets are considered hazardous waste, 3) if certain wash
down water is exempt from the mixture rule; 4) the regulatory status of disposable gloves and
other personal protective equipment; ) the status of wastewater from the cleaning èî gloves and
protective equipment, and 6) if air filters removed from the ventilation system in the
manufacturing process are considered hazardous waste.
We have considered the views expressed in your letter and provide die following response
based on a general principal: in interpreting the hazardous waste regulations at 40 CFR 261.33,
EPA takes the position that a point exists in the manufacturing process in which an operator
creates either a commercial chemical product or manufacturing intermediates. When these
chemicals meet a listing description under 40 CFR 261.33. any discard of these materials
(including these materials captured on filters or mixed with ocher wastes) are considered
hazardous wastes and must be handled accordingly.
Under 40 C.F.R. 261.33, EPA may list as RCRA hazardous wastes various materials
associated with chemical products that become hazardous wastes if and when they are discarded
or are intended to be discarded. Acutely hazardous chemical product wastes are listed in section
26 1.33(e) and are known as “P-wastes.” Other hazardous chemicalproduct wastes are known as
“U-wastes” and are listed at section 26 1.33(f). Not all P or U listed substances wherever found,
however, are RCRA chemical product hazardous wastes. A particular substance is a P or U
waste only if, before discard, it is the sole active ingredient in a “commercial chemical product or
manufacturing chemical intermediate.” See 40 C.F.R. 261.33(a) through (f).

-------
The term “commercial chemical product or manufacturing chemical intermediate” is
interpreted in the “Comment” in 40 C.F.R. 261.33(d). The term refers to a chemical
“manufactured or formulated for a commercial or manufacturing use” which consists of the
commerically pure or technical grades of the chemical and “all formulations in which the chemical
is the sole active ingredient.” This is distinguished from a chemical contained in a manufacturing
process waste. Process wastes are generated prior to the creation of the product or intermediate
and may be listed as F or K wastes under EPA’s listing system.
Once a commercial product or manufacturing intermediate is created, a RCRA hazardous
waste is generated when any of the materials related to the product (as described in section
26 1.33(a) through (f)) is discarded, or intended to be discarded. Because all the activities in your
letter describe discarded materials in one form or another, if a commercial chemical product or
manufacturing intermediate containing warfarin as its sole active ingredient has been created
before any of the activities you describe, the waste must be treated as a RCRA hazardous waste
unless an exemption can be found. Further, your description of your client’s operation as one in
which warfarm is not manufactured, but rather is simply processed into products from warfarin
manufactured at another site, suggests all waste not otherwise exempted would qualiFy as
hazardous because the warfarin enters the operation as a commercial chemical product.
In your letter, you characterize waste from dissolution testing (i.e., placing tablets in a
distilled water solution and observing the results) and integrity testing (crushing or breaking
tablets into fragments) as manufacturing process waste and/or used commercial chemical
products. This interpretation is incorrect. Once the product is manufactured, then the listing of a
commercial chemicaL product under 40 CFR 261.33 attaches. As a practical matter, the crushed
or dissolved waste would be expected to have the same sort of composition and pose the same
sort of threats when discarded as would the untested commercial product and thus must be
managed as a hazardous waste listed under 40 CFR 261 33.
Your statement concerning the applicability of the c/c niininus exemplion under 40 CFR
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(D) to plant wash down water may be correct. The exemption applies to discarded
commercial chemical products or chemical intermediates listed in §261.33 from manufacturing
operations in which the materials are used as raw materials or are produced in the manufacturing
process. The regulatory language in §261 .3(a)(2)(iv)(D) provides several examples of de miiiimis
losses envisioned by the regulatory exemption. Please remember the facility’s discharge of
wastewater must be subject to regulation under Section 402 or 307(b) of the Clean Water Act to
qualiFy for this exemption. Also, please be aware that if the facility’s wastewater treatment
system leaks before the wastewater reaches the headworks of the treatment system, the leaked
material is classified as a §26 1.33 material. In addition, while the de minimis amount is not
quantified in the regulatory language, large material losses would void the de mii imis quantity
exemption.
As for wastewater from the cleaning of protective equipment, the regulatory language of
§261.3(a)(2)(iv)(D) includes “discharges from.., rinsing and cleaning of personal safety
equipment...” Again, if the cleaning was done on the facility’s site and the discharge of
2

-------
wastewater met the requirements for exemption above, the wastewaters would be exempt from
the mixture rule.
With respect to the equipment. itself, the analysis should begin with an evaluation of
whether the substance that comes in contact with the equipment consists of small amounts of the
actual formulated commercial chemical product or manufacturing intermediate (not manufacturing
process wastes). If this is the case, the discarded equipment is debris (a “manufactured object” as
described at 40 CFR section 268.2(g)) containing a listed hazardous waste --discarded product or
intermediate. It, therefore, must be managed as a hazardous waste until it no longer “contains”
the hazardous waste. 57 Fed. Reg. 958 at 986 (Jan. 9, 1992).
There is no explicit exemption for discarded equipment contaminated with minimis
losses from manufacturing operations. However, the contaminated equipment could be washed to
the point that it is considered to no longer “contain” the hazardous waste. This interpretation is
based on the fact that the equipment would qualiFy as hazardous debris under 40 CFR. sections
268.2(g) and (h). Under section 261.3(0(1) it would not be subject to regulation as a hazardous
waste if it is washed using one of the technologies described in section 268.45, Table 1. See, in
particular, physical and chemical extraction technologies.
Whether air filters from the manufacturing process that contain warfarin should be
managed and disposed as northa.zardous waste depends on site-specific details. We would suggest
you review the specific circumstances with the appropriate State agency. As we understand your
letter, warfarin is released as it is prepared in a separate, sealed-ofF area. Air filters used in the
chemical production of a commercial chemical product or manufacturing intermediate meeting a P
or U lis:ingprior to creation of such product or intermediate are considered manufacturing
process wastes which do not fall within the listing under 40 CFR 261.33. However, once the
material starts to meet the listing description as the commercial chemical product or
manufacturing chemical intermediate, the particles of warfarin, or of formulations meeting a P or
U listing description captured by the filters, still constitute the listed commercial chemical product
subject to regulation as hazardous waste, when disposed. The air filters are also subject to
regulation as hazardous waste when disposed because they would constitute a solid waste mixed
with a listed hazardous waste. The air filters, however, like the personal safety equipment, may
also be able to qualiFy as hazardous debris and may be washed to remove the hazardous waste.
The specifics of how your situation apply to the principles stated above should be
reviewed by applicable State Agencies. Please check with the State in which your client’s facility
is located with respect to the application of general principles to the specific circumstances at your
facility and to make sure that other restrictions do not apply.
3

-------
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any addItional questions on this topic, please call
Rick Brandes of my o ce at (703)308-8871.
Sincerely.
David Bussard, Director
Hazardous Waste Identification Division
4

-------
COLBY & NANCE, L.L.P.
1001 G Street. N.W.. Ste. 400 East
Washington. DC 20001
(202) 347-5100
January23, 1997
I
Mr. Richard Brandes
Chief. Waste Identification Branch
OSWER (5304-W)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Re: Request for Classification of ManufactunnQ Waste
Dear Mr. Brandes:
We represent a drug company that is manufacturing a product whose sole active
ingredient is warfarin sodium. Currently, the manufacturer manages and disposes of
all warfarin-containing waste that is generated through compounding and laboratory
operations as RCRA hazardous waste. However, based on our analysis of the
federal regulations, it appears that several of the waste streams need not be
managed as hazardous. We would appreciate learning the Agency’s position as to
whether the waste streams discussed below must be managed as hazardous under
EPA ’s RCRA regulations.
DISCUSSION
The product at issue contains between .45% and 4.5% warfann sodium (depending
on the dose) as its sole active ingredient, and will be marketed under the name
warfarin”. Accordingly, there is no question that the finished product qualifies as
hazardous waste under 40 C.F.R. 261.33(e) (“commercial chemical product”) when it
is disposed of for being off-specification or otherwise in a manner that falls within the
listing. Likewise, the active ingredient warfarin sodium, which is purchased b’y/ our
client for use in the formulation of the drug, is a commercial grade chemical that falls
within the listing in 40 C.F.R. 261.33(e) when it is disposed of in accordance with the
terms of the listing.
The issue on which we are seeking guidance is whether certain wastes containing
warfarin which are generated in the quality assurancelquality control process or in
the compounding process fall within the commercial chemical product listing. Of
course, we are aware t1 t even if these waste streams do not fall within the
commercial chemical product listing; they may fall within some other listing orinay,
Fax: (202) 638-3516
D: .- 7 j I r. . ç
t #: ; - M k _LTt

-------
Mr. Richard Brandes.
01123197
page 2
exhibit a hazardous characteristics However, we are not seeking the Agency’s
position on any other such issues in this letter.
QUALITY ASSURANCEIQUAUTY CONTROL WASTE
i. Dissolution Laboratory Waste
As a part of its quality control procedures under FDA requirements, the manufacturer
routinely tests samples of the finished warfann tablets to determine how fast they will
dissolve after ingestion. Dissolution testing is accomplished by placing tablets in
distilled water for a standard period of time and observing the results. After the
testing is completed, laboratory pcr .onn l dispose of the test solution of water and
drug ingredients, currently as hazardous waste.
According to our understanding of the commercial chemical product listing, this
waste does not fall within the listing. The commercial chemical product listing is
limited to a manufactured product that is disposed of under specific circumstances
listed in the regulations, including when the waste is off-specification, contaminated,
or spilled. . See 40 C.F.R. 261 .33(aHd). The listing does not encompass every
waste, “such as a manufacturing process waste”, that contains the listed chemical.
40 R. 261.33(d) (comment). Here, the residue produced by a quality control
test is essentially a manufacturing process waste, and its disposal does not fall into
any’of’the categories in the listing regulation. Therefore, the waste should not be
considered hazardous under the commercial chemical product listing.
Moreover, although the listing regulation does not state that the commercial
chemical product must be “unused”, EPA has interpreted the listing as being limited
to “unused chemicals”. Nitroglycerin Pills as Commercial Chemical Products,
September 1993 Monthly RCRA Hothne ReporL Under the facts set out above,
testing should be considered the equivalent of use, since the manufacturer has
deliberately altered the product physically or chemically in order to serve a specific
goal. Thus, the dissolution laboratory waste should not be considered to be within
the commercial chemical product listing, and can be discharged to the local.sewer j p”.
system. -
2. Integrity Testing Waste
The manufacturer also conducts physical integrity testing for quality control
purposes. The manufacturer selects a sample of tablets and subjects them to
controlled pressure in order to determine how well they will withstand physical
chipping and breaking. When the test is completed, the manufacturer disposes of
the resulting dust and fragments as hazardous waste.
Just as with the waste generated by dissolution testing, the disposal of this waste
does not fall within any of the categories specified in the commercial chemical

-------
Mr. Richard Brandes
01123197
page 3
product listing. Ukewise, the dust and fragments are analogous to a used or spent
product, since they have been used for the intended purpose of quality control.
Therefore, the waste from integrity testing should not be considered to be within the
commercial chemical product listing.’ (,,)-rj —
MANUFACTURING WASTE
Waste that is generated in the process of manufacturing warfarin tablets for sale
presents different issues. The basic process is simple; the warfarin sodium is
blended with various inert ingredients (primarily lactose, starch and water) and the
mixture is physically converted to granular form. The granules are dried and then
compressed into tablets. Three main waste streams are generated: (1) washdown
water containing residues of warfarin and other drug ingredients, which is generated
by cleaning machinery, containers, implements, and manufacturing rooms, (2)
disposable gloves, gowns, and other personal equipment used by employees in the
manufacturing area, al of which contain traces of warfarin, and (3) airborne dust that
is collected in air filters, which are periodically replaced and discarded.
1. Washdown Water
The commercial chemical product listing specifies that not all manufacturing process
wastes containing chemicals on the list are thereby rendered hazardous. 40 C.F.R.
261.33(d) (comment). However, the listing itself gives no guidance as to which types
of process waste, if any, are to be considered hazardous.
The separate regulations defining hazardous waste contain an exclusion for TM de
minimis losses” of a listed commercial chemical product that occur when the listed
product is used as a raw material or produced in a manufacturing process, so long
as the de minimis quantities are discharged to the sewer system. 40 C.F.R.
261 .3(a)(2)(iv)(D). The regulations state that de minimis losses include spills from
normal material handling operations such as the transfer of materials, leaks from
pipes or process equipment, sample purgings, and discharges from safety showers
and rinsir,g and cleaning of containers and personal safety equipment. j .
This exdusion should apply to washdown water generated in the manufacture of
warfarin when the wastewater is disposed of through the sewer system, as this
waste constitutes a Nde minimis” loss from manufacturing; Moreover, the waste falls
dearly within EPA’s rationale for the regulatory exclusion:
These small losses of raw matenals, products or intermediates are
often disposed of by draining or washing them into the wastewater
treatment system. This typically is a reasonable and practical means
of disposing of these lost materials. Segregating and separately
.ff EPA concuis k condusion, the iotegrity testhig waste be serd for lodueration along wW all ihe her

-------
Mr. Richard Brãndes
01123/97
page 4
managing them often would be exceedingly expensive and may not be
necessary because the small quantities can be assimilated and
treated in the wastewater treatment system.
46 Fed. Reg. 56582, 56586 (November 17, 1981). In addition, the Agency has
noted, because these losses constitute waste of a valuable product, the
manufacturer has a strong incentive to minimize the amount that is lost. j .
Here, despite the efforts of the manufacturer to minimize waste, the washdown
water still contains small quantities of warfarin. The washdown water is currently
collected and disposed of as hazardous waste at considerable expense. However,
sjnc the small amounts of warfarin found in the washdown water fall within this
regulatory exclusion, the manufacturer should be allowed to modify its procedures
and dispose of the washdown water through floor drains or otherwise into the sewer
system.
2. Disposable Gloves and Other Personal Equipment
According to the regulatory exclusion discussed above, wastewater generated from
cleaning gloves, gowns, and other reusable personal equipment would be excluded
from the commercial chemical product listing if the wastewater were discharged to
the sewer. 40 C.F.R. 261 .3(a)(2)(iv)(D). In this case, as a result of FDA
requirements, the manufacturer uses disposable gloves and other protective
equipment to avoid any risk of contaminating the product. As a result, instead of
generating wash water, the manufacturing process generates dry disposable
materials that contain traces of warfarin.
Disposable gloves and other personal equipment wfth traces of warfarin should be
subject to management and disposal as nonhazardous solid waste. As a practical
matter, this is appropriate because the waste presents the same minimal threat to
human health and the environment as the de minimis losses discussed above.
Because of the way the waste is generated and the manufacturers incentive to
minimize the lost product, the waste WIU contain very smal amounts .oLthe listed
commercial chemical product Moreover, when the waste is landfihled, the traces of
warfann Will soon be diluted or broken down into other substances, just as when
wastewater containing trace amounts of product is discharged to the sewer system.
There are at least two ways to analyze this issue under the regulations. First, the
waste (defined as disposable personal prot&ctive equipment containing traces of
warfarin”) can simply be deemed to fall outside the commercial chemical product
listing. The waste is not a “commerciaHy pure grade of the chemical” nor a
“formulation in which the chemical is the sole active ingredient”, nor does it fall within
any of the other categories enumerated in 40 C.F.R. 261.33. Under this analysis,
the waste is simply not a listed hazardous waste, and no exclusion is required.

-------
Mr. Richard Brandes
01123197
page 5
This issue also could be analyzed under EPA’s contained-in policy”. Under this
analysis debris ”, induding dothing and other manufactured items that are being
disposed of, may be considered hazardous if it contains hazardous waste (here, the
traces. of warfann). If the debris were considered potentially hazardous• under the
contained-in policy, then the state regulatory agency would have the option of
determining whether the specific waste stream should in fact be considered
hazardous, based on either site-specific or contaminant specific concentration levels.
Under this scenario, then, the applicable state agency would have the ultimate
decisionmaking authority as to whether the waste should be managed as hazardous.
On these facts, the agencies should allow the waste to be managed as
nonhazardous.
3. Air Filters
The area in which the warfarin is manufactured..is sealed off from the remainder of
the facility, and has a separate ventilation system. The air is continually filtered to
remove any impurities, including traces of warfann that may have become airborne
during the manufacturing process. The air fillers are periodically removed from the
ventilation system and disposed of.
The air filters should be analyzed in essentially the same way as the disposable
gloves and other personal protective items. The simplest approach would be to
determine that the filters fall outside the commercial chemical product listing. An
alternative would be to analyze the filters under the contained-in policy, so that the
applicable state agency would determine whether they need to be managed as
hazardous waste. In either case, based on the particular facts involved here, the air
filters should be managed and disposed of as nonhazardous solid waste.
CONCLUSION
We would appreciate hearing EPA’s interpretation of the RCRA regulations as they
apply to these issues. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to call
me. Thank you for your assistance.
Peter W. Colby

-------
f fti Jerz2g
Chr ,at.nc Todd Whitni n Department ot Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn. Jr
Covirz,e, DIvis oui o( Solid and Hazardoue Waste Comnussioner
CN 41
Trenton. NJ 08625-0414
Tel. 609-9$4 .662U
Fax. #609.984.6874
Mr. Peter W. Colby
Colby & Nance, L.TJ.P.
1001 G. Street, N.W.
Suite 400 East
Washington. D.C.
RE: Request for Classification of Manufacturing Waste
Dear Mr. Colby:
This correspondence is in response to your letter of March 5,
1997 requesting a classification of various waste streams generated
from the manufacturing of drugs that contain warfarin sodium. The
waste streams in the manufacturing process include washdown water,
disposable gloves and personal equipment, air filters, and waste
product from integrity testing. You requested this agency’s
opinion on your interpretation of the hazardous waste regulations
as applied to the above-referenced wastestreams, and your summary
conclusion that all of the above wastes may be managed as
nonhazardous wastes. A5 per your request, each category of waste
generated at various points in the manufacturing process are
addressed as follows on an individual basis:
1. W shdown water containing residues of warfarin which is
eneraced by cleaning machinery, containers, implements.
manufacturing rooms .
The hazardous waste exclusion under “de minimis losses” at 40
C.F.R. 261.3(a)(2)(iv)D, as incorporated by reference at
N.J.A.C. 7:26G-5.l. applies only to the loss of material
during normal product handling operations. The operations
applicable to the generation of the above wastestreams include
the following:
A. Cleaning machinery due to minor leaks. Please note
chat waste generated due to cleaning of the entire
machinery is not included in the above reference.
Therefore, the washdown water from macku.nery cleaning
operation should be managed as hazardous waste.
B. Rinsing of empty containers. The washdwon water
resulting from rinsing of empty containers is exempted
from the hazardous waste regulations per above reference.
,. a,, 6aual Ob cminj ,r EmvIøv

-------
C. Implements - In this regard. more information is
needed that describes the implements used and details as
to hots the waste is accumulated in your client’s
manufacturing process. A determination of the
hazardous /nonhazardoue nature of the washdown water
generated by cleaning implements can be made after
receiving the required information.
D. Washdown water from the manufacturing room. The “de
minimis losses” exclusion is applicable only when the
waste contained in the washdown water is generated due to
minor spill or leaks from normal material handling
operations as described in the above reference. Washdown
water from the manufacturing room may contain waste
generated due to other reasons such as the malfunction of
machinery, spillage due to accidents. etc. Wastes
generated in such a manner are not exempted from the
hazardous waste regulations.
2. Disposable gloves and ocher personal equipment .
This category of waste product consists of gloves and personal
equipment contaminated with manufacturing product. The
efnphasis here is on the disposable nature of the items, not on
the “de minimis” spill of the chemical which is removed by the
washdown water. Such waste materials must be handled as
hazardous wastes that consist of solid waste contaminated with
listed hazardous wastes.
3. Air filters
Air filters contaminated with warfarin would need to be
handled as hazardous waste ].n the same manner as the gloves
and personal equipment mentioned above, since circumstances
are similar.
4. Intearity testina waste
Warfar .n salts are listed as a hazardous waste due to the
nature of its chemical toxicity. Physical crushing of the
tablets does not alter its toxicity characteristic, only the
product’s physical appearance. The remains of tablet crushing.
once integrity testing is performed, is considered a discarded
manufacturing product and should be handled as POOl (if it
contains more than O.3’ of warfar3.n) or U248 it contains
less than O.3 of warfarin).

-------
07,17,9? t j :4 I- Y P H UL$HI £NL ‘ Nu. (caO l ’e’ i )(
If you have further questions, or require further
clarification on the matters discussed herein, please feel free to
concact Dr. Shihthang of my staff at (609) 292-8341.
Very truly yours,
,. ct.Cofer e very
SC/sc and Technica P ograms
1 1197-225
C : Phil Cole. BRP
John Sielamowicz, BRRTP

-------
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Solid & Haza,dous Materials
Bureau of Hazardous Waste Management
50 Wolf Road, Albany. New York I 22337251
518.457.9257 FAX 518.485-8769
Mr. Peter W. Colby MAR 1 1997
Colby& Nance, L.L.P.
Suite 400 East
1001 G Street, LW.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Dear Mr. Colby:
This is in response to your March 4, 1997 letter in which
you request a classification of manufacturing wastes, generated
by a drug company you represent. The following is a
determination of the regulatory responsibility for waste
management, based on the facts you have provided, by waste
category.
quality Assurance/quality Control Waste
1. Dissolution Laboratory Waste
The varfarin tablets that are utilized in dissolution
/ testing are a hazardous waste (POOl) pursuant to 6NYCRR
371.1 (d)(l)(ii)(’d’), known as the “mixture rule.” The
warfarin tablets dissolved in water are a mixture of a solid
and a hazardous wastç which is listed in 6NYCRR 371.4. The
testing you describe is the equivalent of discard of a
listed commercial chemical product, rather than use.
Although the tablets are processed in product testing, they
are “unused,” as intended.
The “mixture rule,” however, does not preclude the direct
discharge of this waste to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW), even though hazardous. All that is needed is the
consent of the sewer agency and compliance with all local
pretreatment requirements and sewer use ordinances.
2. Intearitv Testina Waste
The testing you describe as physical integrity testing for
quality control, once again, does not constitute use,
although it is a necessary step following the manufacturing
process. The resultant, fragmented waste would be
considered off—specification commercial chemical product,
pursuant to 6NYCRR 371.4 (d) (2). Your footnote indicates
that, if non—hazardous, this waste will be sent for
John P. Cohm
Acilag Con ,in(on.,

-------
Mr. Peter W. Colby 2.
incineration. This waste is considered a hazardous waste,
and, although the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) specifies
combustion for treatment, these tablets must be managed as
hazardous and must meet all regulatory requirements of the
LDR as any other hazardous waste.
Manufacturin Waste
1. Wpshdowii Water
The washdown water containing varfarin cannot be considered
“de minimis losses” unless these losses are unintentional .
For example, washouts of formulating vat residues are
routinely generated and would be considered hazardous waste.
However, once again, these wastes are not precluded from
disposal to a POTW if the sewer agency will accept these
wastes.
The “domestic sewage exclusion,” pursuant to 6NYCRB 371.1
(e)(l)(i) and (ii), only applies to the actual point source
discharge, as noted after 371.1 (e)(l)(ii), and requires
that hazardous wastes managed by discharge to a POTW must be
managed as hazardous until such discharge occurs. Wastes
managed in this manner must also meet the notification
requirements of the LDR pursuant to 6NYCRR 376.1 (g)(l)(vi).
Since wastes managed by discharge to a POTW are not excluded
until the point of discharge, they would be considered
hazardous wastes generated for regulatory purposes,
including regulatory fees. Please note that management
options (e.g., storage, treatment) for a hazardous waste
that will eventua]lv be excluded must be in compliance with
all applicable hazardous waste regulatory requirements.
2. DisDosable Gloves and Other _ Personal Eauipment
The wastes you describe in this category fall under the
aforementioned “mixture rule” of 6NYCRR 371.1 (d)(1)(ii)
(‘d’). Although they are not completely and distinctly
identified in the listing of 6NYCRR 371.4 (d), they are a
mixture of a solid waste and a listed waste, and must be
managed as a hazardous waste.
3. Air Filters
You are correct in stating that the air filters should be
considered in essentially the same way as disposal gloves
and personal equipment. If they contain, or are
contaminated with, the pure or off—specification commercial
chemical product, they would be hazardous by the “mixture
rule” of 6NYCRR 371.1 (d)(1)(ii)(’d’), and should be managed
as hazardous waste.

-------
Mr. Peter W. Colby
If you have any questions or would like further explanation
of any statements made above, please contact me at
(511) 485—8988.
Sincerely,
Lawrence J. Nadle , P.E.
Supervisor
Technical Determination Section
Bureau of Hazardous Waste Management
Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
O SZI?
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
4 , , t)
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
/ 9441.1997(07)
JUL 30 1997
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. David it Case
Executive Director
Environmental Technology Council
734 15th St., N.W.
Suite 720
Waahington, D.C. 20005
Dear Mr. Case:
Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1997 concerning the regulatory status under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (ItCRA) of certain vitrification processes for spent
aluminum potliner (K088). We appreciate your interest in this important environmental issue. I
am also pleased that you were able to meet with my staff on past occasions to discuss your
concerns.
After evaluating two proposals to recycle K088 through vitrification into various glass
products, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has concluded that such vitrification can
be a legitimate use of this material which could also be excluded from RCBA regulation under 40
CFR 261.2(e)(1)çi). If a state makes such a determination about specific potential vitrification
facilities, these facilities will be able to use these wastes to make beneficial products without the
necessity of obtaining a RCRA permit.
The Agency will shortly be issuing a letter explaining its conclusions. You have suggested
that before this letter is issued, EPA should make a draft determination available for comment by
interested parties, and that these comments should be considered by the Agency before the final
determination is issued. EPA has agreed to share its draft letter with various interested parties to
obtain their comments on how best to frame our conclusions, but not to revisit the outcome of the
determination. We will be glad to make a draft available to you, and we will be grateful for any
suggestions you may have. However, the Agency does not plan to change its decision in response
to comments received. We have evaluated all relevant issues very thoroughly, and remain
convinced that our conclusion is reasonable.
—. - .a_ 4. ......i..ka . . Od..Ia,I .1S. Ia. fl . SIfl Osea,I ‘nUn ..n •flflO#. D.. .MaA O r.a, fAflW . Dac n%ne pnny

-------
-2-
Thank you pin for your interest in this matter. I hope this letter addresses your
concerns. If ydu have any questions, please call Mike Flynn at 703-308-8894.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Shapiro
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator

-------
Environmental Technology Council
734 15th Si,eea, P&W.
SftiIc 720
W hington. l).C. 20t 5
Tel: (202) 7R -U57O
Fw. (202) 737.2038
BY FA SB ffl . E
July11, 1997
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro
Acting Deputy Assistant Mxrüuistrator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 MStreetS.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Re: 1(018 Vtrification rocesses as Exetnpt Recycling
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I understand that your office is about to document an agency deterrnrnation that
certain vitrification processes for 1(088 spent potliner may qualify as “direct usekeuse”
exempt from all RCRA management standards, permits, and enforcement. As you are
aware, some forms of unregulated hazardous waste “recycling” have resulted in
environmental releases of concern in the past, and for that reason the agency should make
a specific exclusion determination under 40 CFR 261.4 before exempting any h irdous
waste recycling process from RCRA. In this instance, EPA should take a very cautious
approach to a determination regarding K088 vitrification, which wiU no doubt be viewed
as establishing broad precedent relating to the scope of the recycling exemption.
The Environmental Technology Council urges in the strongest terms that the
proposed determination include explicit criteria that, at a mininxun. require a
demonstration that: (1) the process does not involve thermal destni ion of hazardous
wastes; (2) th hazardous waste is selected to meet specifications related to the recycling
purpoac (3) the h wdous waste contributes material values to the pro4uct (4) no
hawdous constituents in the waste constitute “toxics along tbr the ride” in the recycled
product; and (5) the economics clearly demonstrate that a legithn te product is being
produced and sold, and not that the economic advantage results from uncontrolled waste
treatmentfdisposal. We believe that these analytical steps are an absolute minimum and
must be rigorously completed by the regulatory agency before a bone fids recycling
determination can be made. To do otherwise would invite an even greater scope for
uncontrolled management of 1 erdous waste under the guise of “recycling.”
w vn ZCYdW 1 I 1Rf Pi

-------
Mr. N ehae1 K. Shapiro
Ju ly II, 1097
Page 2
We understand that the agency intC*tdS tO prepare a written determination on this
matter. In order to proylde adequate public participixion, we urge that a draft
deter mination be made available for comment by interested paüies and that these
comnmutts be considered by the agency before the final determination is issued.
As always, the Environmental •Teçlmology Council is prepared to work with EPA
on such precedcnt• setting recycling issuet
Sincerely ,
David it Case
Executive Director
cc: Mr. lames Berlow
Mr. David Bussar4
Mr. David Lainett
TOTRL. P.03

-------
Volume 5
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 5

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
COPY FUR YL
I tO INFORMjflØ
I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OS CL) —
_____ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
IRO1 9442.1997(01)
r# joi i
OFFICE OF
SCUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. William L. Warren
Drinker Biddle and Reath
1009 Lenox Drive
Building 4
Lawrencevile, New Jersey 08648
Dear Mr. Warren:
Thank you for your March 5, 1996 letter to Michael Shapiro. In your letter, you
requested guidance, directives or policy documents which address the applicability of the
domestic sewage exclusion (Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 261 .4(a)(1)) in various
situations.
As explained in your phone conversation with Kristina Meson, my staff and I have
closely examined the matters raised in your letter. We have also reviewed the existing
regulations and policies to ascertain whether they address the particular issue(s) which you
identified. Provided below are responses your questions.
Question 1
Is the mixed stream of both chemical process waste and unrrewed sanita,y waste which is
discharged from a manufacturing plan: through a sewer line to a publicly owned trec2ment
works excluded from either the definition of solid or hazardous waste wider the Resource
Conseration and Recoveiy Act (RCRA) e ven i it would other vise be considered a listed or
characteristic hazardous waste?
A mixed stream of process and untreated sanitary waste which is discharged through a
sewer line to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) is not a solid or h rdous
waste under RCRA, even if it would otherwise be considered a listed or characteristic
hazardous waste. Section 1004(27) of RCRA provides that solid or dissolved material
in domestic sewage is not solid waste as defined in RCRA. A corollary is that such
material cannot be considered a h 7 rdous waste for purposes of RCRA. This
exclusion is known as the Domestic Sewage Exclusion (DSE). The DSE covers
industrial wastes discharged to POTW sewers containing domestic sewage, even if
— .. —. — — - - — . — Q _ _ • i’..

-------
these wastes would be considered hazardous if discharged by other means. “Domestic
sewage” means untreated sanitary waste that passes through a sewer system. 40 CFR
part 261 .4(a)(1)(ti). The DSE, however, does not apply if the industrial waste stream
never mixes with sanitary waste in the sewer prior to treatment or storage at the POTW
(e.g. dedicated pipe). Mixtures of sanitary waste and other wastes that pass through
sewer systems to publicly owned treatment works will, however, be subject to controls
under the Clean Water Act, specifically, pretreatment standards at 40 CFR Part 403,
including any applicable local limits imposed by the State or POTW, or by nationally
applicable categorical pretreatment standards.
Question 2
Would a mixed stream of both chemical process waste and untreated sanitary waste which is
discharged from a manufacturing plant through a sewer line connected to a publicly owned
treatment works which would otherwise be considered a characteristic or listed hazardous
waste under RCRA be considered a hazardous waste and/or be required to be managed as a
hazardous waste ij it leaks from the sewer line before it reaches the publicly owned treatment
works?
A mixed stream of chemical process waste (considered a characteristic or listed
hazardous waste under RCRA) and sanitary waste which subsequently leaks from the
sewer line before it reaches the POTW would not qualify for the Domestic Sewage
Exclusion (DSE). To qualify for the DSE, wastes must pass through a sewer system
to a publicly owned treatment works (261.4(a)(1)(ii)). Specifically, EPA has clarified
in a February 12, 1990 letter (enclosed) that wastes removed from a sewer line before
they reach the POTW have not met the conditions of the exemption. “The waste, upon
removal, loses its “excluded” status under the domestic sewage exclusion and becomes
subject to regulation as a solid waste.” Febr z1 12, f’1’f 0 Le er > q4a//. /‘?‘ 0 Ca2)
Question 3
If a manufacturing facility with a RCR.4 corrective action permit has discharged waste
materials of a mixed process and sanitary nature through a sewer line to a publicly owned
treatment works, would a leak from the sewer line beyond the physical boundary of the
manufacturing facility give rise to a solid waste management unit for which the operator of the
manufacturing facility is responsible or would it fall outside the definition of a solid waste
management unit?
Under RCRA corrective action authorities, permits for hazardous waste treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities must require corrective action for releases of hazardous
waste and hazardous constituents from solid waste management units. Corrective
action is also required for releases that migrate beyond the facility boundary, as
necessary to protect human health and the environment (See. e.g., RCRA Sections
3004(u), 3004(v), 4OCFR264.101; 5O 28702,July 15, 1985; 52EE45788,

-------
December 1, 1987; and, 55 ER 1 30798, July 27 1990). The Agency also has the
authority to include corrective action requirements in a facility’s permit under its RCRA
“omnibus” authofity. See RCRA section 3005(c)(3). EPA has defined facility, for the
purposes of corrective action, to mean “all contiguous property under the control of the
owner or operator seeking a permit under Subtitle C of RCRA.” (See 40 CFR
260.10.)
As discussed in our response to question 2, materials leaked from sewer lines before
they reach a P01W are no longer shielded by the DSE and are considered solid waste.
Depending on whether or not the pipes from which the materials leaked are considered
part of a “facility,” they would or would not be subject to corrective action.
Generally, releases from pipes or collection systems controlled by the owner/operator
of a facility subject to corrective action would be considered part of the “facility” and
would, therefore, also be subject to corrective action, as follows.’
If it is determined, based on site-specific considerations, that a sewer line is part of a
“facility” for purposes of corrective action, leaks from the line could likely be
addressed as either solid waste management units (SWMU) or areas of concern (AOC).
EPA typically distinguishes between releases that constitute SWMUs and releases that
constitute AOC by considering factors such as the rate of leakage and whether the
release was routine or systematic. (55 fK 30808, July 27, 1990; 61 ER 1 19442, May 1.
1996.) At permitted facilities, releases from solid waste management units that occur at
facilities are typically addressed using the authority of RCRA Sections 3004(u), while
releases from facilities (i.e., beyond the facility boundary) are addressed using RCRA
Section 3004(v). Non-SWMU related releases (i.e., AOC), either within or beyond the
facility boundary, are typically addressed using the omnibus permitting authority of
RCRA section 3005(c)(3) where necessary to protect human health and the
environment. In addition to the corrective action authorities associated with RCRA
permitting, where applicable, the interim status corrective action order authority of
section 3008(h) may also be used to address similar types of releases at interim status
facilities. Since both SWMUs and AOCs are subject to corrective action requirements,
EPA has discouraged extended debate over distinctions between SWMU and AOC;
discussions, and resources, should more properly focus on whether there has been a
release that requires remediation (60 ER1 19442, May 1, 1996).
Note that, application of corrective action requirements typically depends on a number
tplease note that the determination of what constitutes the i’acility” for purposes of corrective action will be
influenced by a number of site-specific factors. In the case of a sewer line, for example. a number of factors might
influence whether or not the line was part of a “facility” including, for example. whether the facility owner/operator
(e.g.. versus the POTW) also owns or operates the line or portions of the line, whether the facility owner/operator (e.g..
versus the POTW) is responsible for maintenance of the line or portions of the line, and/or the extent to which the line
is dedicated to facility operations (e.g.. versus carries wastes from many unrelated facilities). Owner/operators should
consult with the appropriate EPA Regional Office or authorized state to determine the extent of their ‘facility” for
purposes of corrective action.

-------
of site- and waste-specific considerations that EPA typically uses when developing site-
specific corrective action requirements. I encourage you to consult with the appropriate
EPA region or adthorized state to ensure that site-specific circumstances are
appropriately considered. In addition, whether or not corrective action requirements
apply, cleanup of releases of solid waste may be required under a number of federal or
state authorities, including, at the federal level, RCRA section 7003 or CERCLA
section 106.
Question 4
If a manufacturing facility with a ACRId corrective action permit discharges mixed process and
.canitaiy waste materials to a publicly owned treatment works through a sewer line, does a
basis exist for including in that corrective action permit areas of contamination beyond the
physical boundaries of the manufacturing facility owned and operated by the permittee caused
by a lea/c from the sewer line at a point beyond the physical boundary of the manufacturing
facility owned and operated by the permittee?
See response to question 3.
Thank you for your interest in the havlrdous waste regulations. If you need more
information on the domestic sewage exclusion, please contact Kristina Meson, of my staff, at
(703) 308-8488. Questions on RCRA corrective action should be addressed to Elizabeth
McManus in the Corrective Action Programs Branch at (703) 308-8657. Also, in authorized
states, the state implements its own regulations in Lieu of the Federal RCRA program. An
authorized state’s requirements and policies may be different than those of the Federal
program, therefore, it is important to contact your state environmental agency about this and
other RCRA issues.
Sincerely,
David Bussard, Director
Hazardous Waste Identification Division

-------
D9
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
L PRcØ
9442.1997(02)
MAY 13 Iggr
OFFICE CF
SCUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Lynn West, Chief
Regulatory Development Section
Office of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
100 North Senate Avenue
P.O. box 6015
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015
Dear Ms. West,
Thank you for your May 8, 1997 fax requesting clarification of the regulatory status of
iron and steel slags and gypsum.
The regulatory status of iron blast furnace slag and basic oxygen furnace and open hearth
furnace slag from carbon steel production under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) is found at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7) which states that these slags are solid wastes which are
not ha iirdous wastes. Therefore these slags are RCRA solid wastes.
The Agency studied ferrous metal mineral processing wastes in the 1990 Report to
Congress on Special Wastes from Mineral Processing. On June 13, 1991, the Agency
promulgated a final rule which retained the Bevill exclusion for iron blast furnace slag and basic
oxygen furnace and open hearth furnace slag from carbon steel production (See 56 FR 27300).
This rule indicated that the management of iron and steel slags under RCRA Subtitle C was
unwarranted. This rule did not alter their regulatory status under RCRA Subtitle D as solid
wastes.
Your fax requested regulatory clarification on the RCRA status of gypsum. I understand
from my staff, based upon recent conversations that they bad with you, that you are actually
seeking clarification on the regulatory status of flue gas emission control wastes. The regulatory
status under RCRA of flue gas emission control waste generated primarily from the combustion
of coal or other fossil fuels is also found at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7). It states that these emission
control wastes (which often contain large amounts of gypsum) are RCRA solid wastes which are
not ha ardous wastes.
Rscycl.dlRscyCIabI. .Pglnled wI Vege . Cu Baaed Inks on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Postonnsiaiter)

-------
If you have any further questions regarding the regulatory status of RCRA special wastes,
please feel free to contact Rich Kinch, Chief of the Industrial and Ex active Wastes Branch at
(703) 308-8424.
Sincerely,
Waste
Acting Director

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
June 1997
9442.1997(03)
1. Air Emissions from Electroplating
Operations
RCRA hazardous waste code F006 applies to
sludges resulting from the treatment of
electroplating wasrewa:ers (p261.31(a)).
Filters used to remove contaminants from
electroplating wasrewaters fit the definition of
sludge under 26O.1O and are F006
hazardous wastes when disposed (Memo,
Abrams to Duncan; May 5, 1987). An
electroplating facility has a vent associated
with the electroplating line that captures
volatilized air emissions from the line and
concentrates them in a filter. If the
contaminated filter is to be discarde4 would it
caTty the F006 listing?
The filter used to concentrate air emissions
from the electroplating line would not carry
the F006 listing because the air emissions are
not wastewater. Although the filter does meet
the definition of sludge, it does not result from
the treatment of an electoplating wastewater,
and therefore does not meet the F006 listing
description. EPA has defined “wastewater”
only within the land disposal restrictions
program, and has not provided a general
definition for purposes of the electoplating
listings. For clarification regarding the
general definition of wastewater as it pertainc
to the F006 listing, individuals should contact
their EPA Region or authorized state.

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9443.1997(01)
IAAV I a OFFICE OF
I’INI ‘ I SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
T.L. Nebrich, Jr.
Technical Director
Waste Technology Services, Inc.
640 Park Place,
Niagra Falls, New York, 14301
Dear Mr. Nebrich:
Thank you for your letter of March 5, 1997 in which you request a clarification of the
definition of the characteristic of reactivity in 40 CFR 261 .23(a)(6) as it pertains to aerosol
cans.
Over the past several years we have received numerous questions concerning the
regulatory status of used aerosol cans under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) hazardous waste regulations. We are not at this time able to make a categorical
determination as to whether various types of cans that may have contained a wide range of
products exhibit the characteristic of reactivity. It remains the responsibility of the generator
of any particular waste to make this determination (see 40 CFR 262.11). However, a steel
aerosol can that does not contain a significant amount of liquid (e.g., a can that has been
punctured and drained) would meet the definition of scrap metal (40 CFR 281.1 (c)(6)), and,
if it is to be recycled, would be exempt from regulation under 40 CFR 261.6 (a)(3)(iv).
Scrap metal that is recycled is exempt from RCRA regulation under this provision even if it
is hazardous waste, so generators need not make a hazardous waste determination. Scrap
metal that is not recycled, however, is subject to the hazardous waste regulations if it is
hazardous, so generators must make a hazardous waste determination.
I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any further questions, please
call Anna Tschursin of my staff at (703) 308-8805.
Sincerely yours,
1i beth A. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
wT
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.
Mr. Michael Shapiro, Director
Office ffSolid Waste
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I am requesting a clarification of the definition of the characteristic of reactivity in
40 CFR 261.23 (a) (6) as it pertains to aerosol cans.
The only guidance I can find on the subject is a RCRA/Superfiind/OUST Hotline
Monthly Report (see attached). However, the questioner may have presented his/her case
utilizing a leading question by stating ‘ ..making the cans reactive-..”.
My question is... .are aerosol cans, which still contains ingredients/propellants or
which are evacuated with still some propellants in them (empty as per common industry
practices), considered D003-reictive? Does it matter if the ingredient or propellant is
flammable? I guess I have a couple of scenarios.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
WASTE INC.
T.L. Nebrich, Jr., CHMM, Q
Technical Director
7T2
March 5, 1997
‘1
T eohone 716-282-4100.
huID
/
TLN/tln
— — —. . .. — — .— __.,_ t1..•. V .I. dan .

-------
UNITED SI ATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGeNCY
9443.1997(02)
MAY 2 2 ‘p97
Mr. T.L. Nebrich, Jr.
Waste Technology Services, Inc.
640 Park Place
Niagara Falls, New York 14301
Dear Mr. Nebrich:
I am responding to your March 5, 1997 letter to Mr. Michael Shapiro where you seek
clarification as to how ignitable solids, which you believe include solvent contaminated rags or
shop towels, fit into the DOOl characteristic of ignitability found in 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(1) or
(a)(2).
A solvent-contaminated rag can be a hazardous waste if it exhibits a hazardous waste
characteristic. EPA recommends that the state program or EPA regional office implementing the
RCRA program make such a determination on a site-specific basis.
With respect to ignitable solids that could be characteristically hazardous, the Agency
currently does not have a specific test method for hazardous waste handlers; i.e., generators,
transporters and treatment, storage and disposal facilities, to use in determining whether an
ignitable solid is characteristically ignitable (DOOl). Instead, handlers are advised to use their
best engineering judgement in determining whether an ignitable solid material is
characteristically hazardous, and therefore subject to RCRA regulation. Unfortunately, the
information you provided in your letter is insufficient for us to determine whether you have a
material that should be regulated as a hazardous waste. Two additional pieces of information
may help you in this determination.
In May of 1995, the EPA proposed Test Method 1030 for ignitable solids as part of
SW-846. (See attachment.) This test method is based on the test procedure adopted by the
Department of Transportation from the United Nations regulations for international
transportation of dangerous goods and is contained in Appendix E to Part 173 of 49 CFR. The
EPA expects to promulgate this test method in May 1997. However, we have yet to determine if
and when we will modify 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(2) to specifically include Test Method 1030 for
ignitable solids. In the meantime, I would recommend that you evaluate your site-specific
ireiini t tnrec and determine whether this method can assist you in determining whether you

-------
placed on the rag, the type of rag used, and the number of rags used daily in the workplace, and
how these rags are stored.
1 also would point out that it is quite possible to have solvent-contaminated rags with no
free liquids that are still capable of failing the tests found under 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(1) or (a)(2).
In the first instance, this can occur when numerous solvent-contaminated rags are placed in a
container, and through the force of gravity, cause solvent to percolate from the rags on top of the
container to the bottom creating free liquids. These free liquids, in turn, would have to pass the
tests cited under 40 CFR 261.21 (a)( 1). In the second instance, this can occur when ignitable
solvent-contaminated rags are placed in an environment with oxygen present, “causing tire
through friction, absorption of moisture or spontaneous chemical changes and, when ignited,
burns so vigorously and persistently that it creates a hazard.” (See 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(2)).
A few states have identified situations where fires occurred in trucks transporting solvent-
contaminated rags that were stored in an original non-saturated condition. We also are aware of
industry practices involving the application of large amounts of solvents on wipers that would
probably be considered saturated, but still not have any free liquids. Facilities may want to be
diligent in checking the bottom of containers storing these spent solvent-contaminated rags both
because that determines if the test for ignitable liquids is relevant (40 CFR 261.21 (a)(l)) and
because many state policies distinguish between containers with free liquids and those without --
particularly with respect to reusable shop towels.
Many States also have addressed the solvent-contaminated rag issue. You should consult
your State regulatory agency because their policies may assist you in making a determination of
how these materials should be managed.
If you have any further questions, please contact Jim O’Leary of my staff at (703)
308-8827.
Sincerely
David Bussard,
Hazardous Waste Identification Division

-------
wT
( hJlt
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.
Mr. Michael Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
March 5, 1997
At the risk of beating the proverbial tiead horse, I would like get an additional
clarification of my DOOl flammable solids question which I have proposed in the past (see
attached letter). However, this time I would like to be specific. The question again
revolves around the definition ofDOOl ignitable solids (non-liquid) and how it may fit into
the DOOl definition in 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(1) or (a)(2).
The material in question would be rags and/or miscellaneous debris which contains
solvents. Whether these solvents are spent (i.e., F003, F005), I think is irrelevant (fl). ..._— .,t’
The rags and/or debris are not saturate and there is no free liquid (solvents). There may
be a flash point to the rags but, again, I assume that is irrelevant also since there has to
liquid to have a flash point relevant to the definition ofDOOl ignitability. These rags
would not meet the criteria in 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(2) (i.e., ...friction spontaneous chçniical
changes, etc.).
Therefore, under this scenario, would this type of material meet the DOOl ignitable
criteria for designation as EPA Waste Number D00l? Also do you think there is any
chance of these rags meeting the criteria in 40 CFR 261.21 (a)(2) (i.e., . ..friction
spontaneous chemical changes, etc.)?
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
.— ..
fL L
c J
Vez ’ truly yours,
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
7Z2/ 4’
T.L. Nebiich, Jr., CHMM, Q
Technical Director
Tqteøhone 716-282-4100 6 2-698
— .....

-------
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.
July 31, 1995
Mr. Michael Shipiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S. N.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shipiro:
There has k’een a discuss ion raggthg in our inciustry
(hazardous waste consulting) for the past few years regarding
a DOOl ignitable solid. Some of our clients (generators)
want to identify their solid (non—liquid) wastes as DOOl when
it’s only based on a flashpoint test as outlined
40CFR261.21(a) (1). They then want to ship the waste as a DOT
Flammable Solid.
We have tried to point out that non—liquid, solid waste
cannot meet the definition of a R RA characteristic of
ignitability 4OCFR 261.21 unless it is “not a liquid and is
capable, under standard temperature and pressure . . . .
(40CFR261.21(a)(2)]. Now with the subcategories for DOOl on
a LDR Notification it makes it even more difficult to
identify a DOOl solid as ignitable since there is no category
which fits a Flammable Solid in 40CFR261.21(a)(1).
Could you please clarify the difference between the
definition for the Characteristic of Ignitability as it
pertains to solids (non—liquids) vs. liquids. Has there been
any change since the 1989 to letter Mr. Travis P. Wagner (see
enclosed).
If you should have any questions, please do xzot hesitate
to call.
Very truly yours,
WASTE TECE OLOGY SERVICES? INC.
T. L. Nebrich, Jr., CHMN
Technical Director
TLN/kj 1
Enclosure
640 Park Place. Niagara Falls. New York. 14201 Telechone 716-282.4100 • Fax 716-282-6986

-------
Volume 6
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 6

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
9444.1997(01)
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
May 1997
a petroleum refinery (i.e., used to store
productfcrude prior to shipment off-site) and
1. Applicability of K052 Waste Code to which generate leaded bottoms are covered by
Pipeline Terminals the K052 listing.
The hazardous waste listing K052 applies
to tank bottoms (leaded)from the petroleum
refining indusrry (40 CFR §261.32). A
pipeline company generates leaded tank
bottoms at bulk terminals and distribution
points which are not part of a refinety. Are
these leaded tank bottoms considered K052
waste?
No. The K052. listing is limited to only
those leaded tank bottoms which are g iwrated
at or as part of a petroleum refinerj. I - “I ’c1 .
tank bottoms generated at pipeline terminals
that are not directly part of a petroleum
refinery are not currently listed, and will be
deemed hazardous only if they exhibit a
characteristic of hazardous waste ( Lem’r ,
Lindsey to Keough June 6, 1981). This
interpretation is made clear by the
Background Document, which defines the
scope of the listing. That document describes
a petroleum refinery as a complex
combination of interdependent operations
engaged in the s paration of cnide oil by
molecular cracking, molecular rebuilding, and
solvent refinishing to produce a varied list of
intermediate and finished products
( Background Document: 26l.31 and 261.32
- Lisrin of Hazardous Wastes . November 14,
1980. p. 685). The disnnctiou bvtweerr
petroleum r f ning and .pipeln operazions
depends on the type of activity being
conducted. Only ranks that are directly part of

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
June 1997
9444.1997(02)
2. Use as Ingredient Not within
Solvent Listing
The spent solvent listings (FOOl-FOOS) apply
to only those solvents that are used for their
“solvent” properties, such as to mobilize or
dissolve other constituents, and not those used
as an ingredient in the fonnulation of a
commercial chemical product (50 53315;
December 31, 1985). If the owner br operator
ofa facility thins a paint product with toluene
of greater than ten percent concentration
before applying the paint to the facility, would
any unused paint be considered F005 if it is
disposed of?
The paint mixture would not be considered a
listed F005 waste when disposed. Although
toluene, when a spent solvent, meets the F005
listing description, use of a solvent as an
ingredient is not covered by the spent solvent
listings. Thus, when unused solvent is added
to a product (e.g., paint, ink) as an ingredient,
any unused product being disposed of would
not carry an F listing. However, if the solvent
served as the sole active ingredient for the
function of the product (i.e., a solvent), then
the disposed unused product may be a P- or U-
listed hazardous waste ( 26l.33).

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Volume 7
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 7

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
S74? .4
% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC11ON AGENCY
_____ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460.
9472.1997(01)
J.t1 I 0 1991 OFFICE OF
SOUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Robert J. Tierney
United Technologies,
Pratt & Whitney
400 Main Street
East Hartford, Connecticut 06106
Dear Mr. Tierney:
Thank you for your letter of May 21, 1997 regarding the
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) personnel training
requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). You request concurrence on your interpretation of the
requirements for annual training found at 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 264.16 and 40 CFR 265.16 as they apply to
employees of treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs).
These requirements also apply to large quantity generators
subject to 262.34 (a) (4). Specifically, you ask whether your
system of annual training comports with the federal requirements.
Based on the description provided in your letter, the Agency
believes that your training program meets the federal
requirements for training found at 40 CFR § 264.16 and 265.16.
As you know, under Section 3009 of RCRA (42 U.S.C. Section 6929),
states retain authority to promulgate regulatory requirements
that Pare more stringent than the federal regulatory requirements.
Therefore, you should contact the state(s) in whi h you operate
for a more site—specific determination.
In general, EPA requires TSDFs and generators of more than
1,000 kilograms per month of hazardous waste (or more than 1
kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste) who accumulate
waste on site to comply with the personnel training requirements
outlined at 40 CFR 264.16 and 40 CFR 265.16. The requirement at
40 CFR 264.16 and 40 CFR 265.16. requires facility personnel to
“take part in an annual review o f the initial training...” The
purpose of this requirement is to ensure that facility personnel
maintain expertise in the areas to which they are assigned
thereby. reducing the potential for mistakes that might threeten

-------
human health or the environment. This requirement also ensures
that personnel a e able to respond effectively in emergency
situations.
The Agency is aware that companies may have many employees,
and must organize training so that groups of employees can take
training together. As stated in your letter, United
Technologies, Pratt & Whitney requires employees to take
refresher training within a 90—day window before the one—year
anniversary of the original training. Under this system,
employees who receive training during the beginning of the 90—day
window in one year, and at the end of the 90-day window in the
next year, may have as many as 15 months between training
courses.
While it may be infeasible for companies with many employees
to train each employee exactly one year after the last training,
the Agency does expect companies to attempt to provide training
so that personnel are trained every year. While United
Technologies, Pratt & Whitney’s program may allow as much as 15
months to pass between training courses, an employee would, over
the course of four years for example, receive 4 annual training
reviews. Therefore, United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney’s
training system as described in your letter would meet the
requirements of the federal regulations at 40 CFR 264.16, and 40
CFR 265.16.
As stated previously, states may interpret the regulatory
requirements more stringently than the federal regulations and
should be consulted for an interpretation on this matter.
Thank you for your interest in the safe management of
hazardous wastes.
Sincerely,
lizabeth Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
lAY 21’9? 17:18 FR P 14 ENURNMNT HLTT SFTY 03 565 3324 TO 82022603527 P.02’03
UNITED 400 M.Jn 8t’sst
List Mwtlwd. Cunfi.s U ut0S10S
PRATT&WHflh4Ey
FAX COPY
May21, 1997
Lynda Wynn
Office of Solid Waste
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C.
Re: Ernpioyee Training
Dear Ms. Wynn:
The puipose of this letter is to seek EPA’s concurrence with IJTC, P U &
Whitney’s understanding of the requirement on 40 CFR 264.16(c) and 40
CFR 265.16(c) for annual review of training. The training regulation, like
rnany of the RCRA regulations, is susceptible to multiple interpretations.
UTC, Pratt & Whitney has established an extensive program for training over
15,000 employees in accordance with the requirements of RCRA. Under that
system, each employee has an environmental training anniversary and all
refresher training would be conducted with reference to that anniversary’.
Refresher trsirning is conducted at any time within a 90-day penod before the
anniversary date (the “90-day enz ollment window). Thus, in any year, by the
time the uiployee’s anniversary date occurs, the employee will have received
refresher training.
While this system ensures that training occurs annually, before the
anniversary date, it is possible under this system for an employee to go as
long as 15 months between training This could occur if, for example, an
employee with a training anniversary date of June 1 reóeives refresher
training on March 1 (the beg nning of the 90-day enrollment window) in one
year and not until June 1 (the end of the 90-day enrollment window) the
following year.
We believe our system complies with the regulation requiring annual training
because training will always occur before the anniversary date . Furthermore

-------
MAY gz’97 17:18 FR PW ENIJRNMNT HLTT SFTY 03 565 3324 TO 82022603527 P..03’03
we believe this system will provide for the most efficient and orderly training
of a large population of RCRA trainees and will result in a simple and clear
system of record keeping to demonstrate compliance. However, given the
multiple possible interpretations of the phrase “ Rnnnzll review of initial
training” in 40 CFR 264.16 and 265.16, we seek yoiwconcwrence that.our
program, as described above, will meet the requirements of the applicable
regulations.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like any further
inform 4ion concerning our trz ining system, please do not hesitate to contact
me at (860) 565-0982.
Your response can be FAXed to me at (860) 565-3324 or mailed to:
UTC. Pratt & Whitney
400 Main Street, M/S 105-11
East Hartford, CT 06108
Sincerely,
Q ’ T ‘
Robert J. Tiemey,
Manager, Group Environment, Health & Safety
‘This anmversaiy is established as the daze of the employee’s 1993 RCRA training (either
initial or refresher) or, for new employees or transfers, as the date of their hdtial training in
years after 1993. This date would remain with the employee for as long as he or she held
a position requiring trRinne
SiTlswiul$
*ó TOTAL PPG .003 **

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
February 1997
9476.1997(01)
2. Delay of Closure
Owners or operators of permitted and
interim status treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) must comply with the facility
closure standards in 40 CFR Parts 264 265,
Subpart G, and the spec fic standards
applicable to the unit in which they are
managing hazardous waste. These closure
standards require owners or operators to treat,
remove from the unit or facility, or dispose of
on site all hazardous waste in accordance with
the approved closure plan within 90 days after
receiving the final volume of hazardous waste
or within 90 days after approval of the closure
plan, whichever is later ( J264f265.113(a)).
Owners or operators of suiface impoundments,
landfills, and land treatment units can delay
the closure timetable beyond the 90 day period
and allow the units to accept nonhazardous
waste, provided they meet conditions in j264/
265.113(d). Can owners or operators of ranks,
container storage areas, waste piles, or
incinerators at permitted or interim status
TSDFs delay closure in this manner as well?
No. The delay of closure provisions of
§ 264/265.1 13(d) are limited to landfills,
surface impoundments, and land treatment
units. Owners or operators of tanks,
containers, waste piles, and incinerators are not
allowed to delay closure and accept only
nonhazardous waste in such units (54 E 1
3338 1; August 14, 1989). In order for these
units to accept nonhazardous waste after the
last shipment of hazardous waste has been
received, the owner or operator must first
comply with all applicable closure standards
including removing and decontaminating all
contaminated equipment. soils, and structures.
These closure standards are compatible with
the future use of such units, and closing them
before receiving nonhazardous waste should
not place an undue burden on owners or
operators (54 f , 33381; August 14, 1989).

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9477.1997(01)
FEB 27 i .’7
OFFICE OF
Memorandum $01.10 WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Subject: Obsolete Language in the Financial Test for Subtitle C Treatment Storage and
Disposal Facilities
From:
Officey Solid Waste
To: Senior RCRA Policy Advisors
RCRA Enforcement Managers
This memorandum provides guidance to Regions and States on an acceptable form for the
independent certified public accountant’s (CPA’s) special report that owners or operators must
submit when using the financial test and corporate guarantee to comply with EPA’s financial
assurance regulations. This guidance is necessary because the regulatory requirement (that the
CPA’s report provide “negative assurance”) has become inconsistent with current professional
auditing standards.
Background on the Regulations
Subpart H of 40 CFR parts 264 and 265 allows owners and operators of RCRA treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities to use a financial test or a corporate guarantee to demonstrate
financial assurance. In using the financial test or corporate guarantee, the owner or operator’s
chief financial officer (CFO) must submit (1) a letter using the language specified in 40 CFR
264.151 to report financial information and test results, (2) a copy of the firm’s audited year end
financial statement, and (3) a copy of a special report from a CPA. The CPA’s special report
presents the procedures performed and findings based on the CPA’s comparison of the data
which the chief financial officer’s letter specifies as coining from the independently audited year
end financial report with the amounts in the audited financial statements. The regulations also
require the CPA’s report to state that “In connection with that procedure, no matters came to his
attention which caused him to believe that the specified data should be adjusted” (see, for
example, 40 CFR part 264. 143(f)(3)(iii)(B)). This is referred to by the auditing profession as a
“negative assurance.”
The CFO’s letter must discuss any adjustments made in the data to report the results of
the financial test that differ from the amounts in the audited financial statements. The purpose of
the CPA’s special report on the CFO’s letter is to ensure that information provided in the
financial test is consistent with information in the firm’s audited financial statements. This is
particularly important when information cannot be checked directly against the financial repe

-------
because of adjustments by the chief financial officer. An allowable adjustment by the chief
financial officer for the Subtitle C financial test was discussed in the preamble to the
proposed corporate financial test for municipal solid waste landfills (59 FR 51530, October 12,
1994). The preamble states that in reporting for “post-retirement benefits other than pensions”
(e.g. health benefits for a company’s retirees), the Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement 106 allows either an immediate or deferred recognition of these benefits as liabilities.
Since either method is allowable under generally accepted accounting principles for financial
reports, EPA will allow companies to use the immediate recognition method for their financial
reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the delayed method for purposes of
the financial test.
New Professional Standards for CPAs Do Not Permit Expressions of Negative Assurance
In performing audits and other types of work, CPAs must follow certain professional
standards. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc.’s (AICPA’s) Statement
on Auditing Standards no longer permits independent auditors to express negative assurance (i.e.
“no matter came to his attention which caused him to believe that the specified data should be
adjusted.”). The new standards require the auditor to present the results of procedures performed
i i the form of findings, and explicitly disallow issuing “negative assurance.” This has left many
accountants, corporations and States uncertain how to fulfill the regulatory requirement for using
the financial test.
Use of a Report from an “ Agreed Upon Procedure ”
The Agency intends to change the regulations so that they conform to the new
professional auditing standards. Until that rulemaking is completed, in addition to, or in lieu of,
a CPA report stating that “no matter came to his attention,” EPA will accept a CPA’s report
describing the procedures performed and related findings, including whether or not there were
discrepancies found in the comparison, based on an agreed-upon procedures engagement
performed in accordance with AICPA’s Statement on Auditing Standards No.75. Engagements
to Apply Agreed-Upon Procedures to Specified Elements. Accounts or Items of aFinancial
Statement . (In an agreed-upon procedures engagement an accountant is engaged by a client to
issue a report of findings based on specific procedures performed on the specific items of a
financial statement.) The Agency will regard this report as satisfying the requirements of the
financial test or corporate guarantee for a special report by an independent CPA on the CFO’s
letter.
Please distribute a copy of this memo to your authorized states. Also, if you or your
authorized States have any questions on this issue, please feel free to contact Dale Ruhter at
(703) 308-8192.
cc: Steven Herman, OECA
Tom Kennedy, ASTSWMO

-------
.dtO S) 4j
.“ . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTiON AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
4L 9477.1997(02)
APR 30 J997
OFFiCE OF
SOUD WASIE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Billie S. Flaherty
Beazer East, Inc.
436 Seventh Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
Dear Ms. Flaherty:
Elizabeth Cotsworth has requested that I respond to your March 19, 1997 letter to her on
our interpretation of 40 CFR 264.151(k). That letter raised two questions on EPA’s
interpretation of the letter of credit requirements for liability coverage, specifically the words
“annual aggregate.”
Your letter states that you currently have a letter of credit from Chase Manhattan Bank in
the amount of $12 million to satisf ’ the third-party liability requirements of the State of
Pennsylvania. This letter of credit was issued on December 26, 1996 for a period of one year.
Chase Manhattan has questioned whether it is liable for $12 million for the last six days of 1996
and an additional $12 million for the remaining 359 days of 1997 for which financial assurance is
being provided. EPA interprets the amount as not increasing when the period of time for the
letter of credit spans a new calendar year. EPA interprets the words “annual aggregate” to refer
to the amount for the one year period of the letter of credit.
The other issue is whether the extension of a letter of credit for an additional year
increases the amount of the letter of credit. In particular, does the extension of the letter of credit
add to the amount of the bank’s exposure? EPA does not interpret the automatic renewal
provisions as increasing the amount of the letter of credit in the renewal period above the annual
aggregate amount. If, however, a claim is paid under a letter of credit, in the succeeding renewal
period the amount of the letter of credit would have to increase to the level required as the annual
aggregate (assuming that the letter of credit is the only mechanism used to demonstrate financial
assurance for third party liability). Thus, in any given year, the exposure of the issuer of the letter
of credit is limited to the amount of the annual aggregate.
Rscyd.dlRscyctabls • PIWed with Vegetable 0 Based lnl on 100% Recycled Paper (20% Po nsumsi)

-------
In providing this information, EPA notes that it is giving its interpretation of the Agency ’s
requirements. In responding to your letter, we have not reviewed the financial assurance
requirements for Pennsylvania or other jurisdictions with State-administered financial assurance
programs. Further, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, States may have more
stringent requirements than EPA’s. If you should have fUrther questions on this matter, please
call Dale Ruhter of my staff at (703) 308-8192.
Sincerely,
Stephen Heare, Acting Director
Permits and State Programs Division

-------
BEAZER EASZ INC., 436 SEVENTH AVENUE, PiTTSBURGH, PA 15219 USA
TEL: 412 227-2430 FAX: 412-227-2042
LAW DEPAATht 1T
Jill M. Bluziido
c c i
T mu &
Mazy Dombm iki Wrtghr
Billie S. Raherty
William E Ciada
MaiyChiz iey
r ecLleoFaye
Robert M. bzcas
Edwazd O ’Connell
March 19, 1991
PH th A. Cotsworth
Acting Director, Office of Solid Waste
United Stares Environmental Protection Agency
401 SW M Street, Mail Code S3OIW
Ws.chingtcn. DC 20460
RE: Clarification Regarding the Use of Letters of Credit for Assuring Third Party Liability
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( ‘RCRA’ )
Dear Ms. Corsworth:
On behalf of Beazer East , Inc. (‘Beazer’) and Chase Manh2nan Bank (‘Chase Manh tt n”), I
am writing to request the Environmental Protection Agency’s (‘EPA’s”) interpretation of 40 C.F.R.
§264.151(k) as this regulation relates to the annual aggregate amount of third-party liability which must
be assured using a letter of credit for sudden and nonsudden accidental ocourrences.
Section 264.151(k) eci5es the wording for irrevocable andby letters of credit used to
demonstrate financial assurance for third-parry liability. The language of the letter of credit at issue
provides, in relevant part, that it is established for ‘awards or settlements up to the amount of...U.S.
dollars $___ per o irrence, and the annual aggregate amount of...U.S. dollars $ ...‘ 40
C.F.R. §264.151(k). (emphasis added ) The letter of credit further provides that it ‘is effective as of
[ date] and shall expire on [ daze] [ at least one year later], but such expiration date shall be automatically
extended for a period of [ at least one year] on [ daze] and on each successive expiration date...’ unless
apprcpriare notice is provided by the issuer that the letter of credit will not be extended. j4
By way of background, Beazer is a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvatna Bearer provides financial assurance for third-party liability for facilities located in 10
staw& By regulation, Beazer’s deadiline for filing financial assurance is ninety days after the close of
it’s fiscal year. Bea7er’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the end of September (i.e.,
September 28, 1996). Accordingly, on December 26, 1996, Chase Manhattan - Delaware issued
—

-------
Elizabeth Cotsworth
March 19, 1997
Page 2
letter of credit in satisfaction of Beazer’s third-party liability financial assurance requirements under
RCRA for the annual aggregate amount of $12 million. The letter of credit was issued for $12 million
to satisfy the Pennsylvania requirements, which are more stringent than the federal requirements.
Through our discussions with Chase Manhattan in obtaining the letter of credit, we have identified two
specific issues which require clarification from EPA.
First, because Beazer’s fiscal year is not the calendar year, the twelve-month period for which
financial assurance is being provided does not coincide with the calendar year. Chase Manhattan has
questioned whether, based on the use of the term “annual aggregate” in the regulations, it is liable for
$12 million for the last six days of 1996 and an additional $12 million for the remaining 359 days of
1997 for which financial assurance is being provided. In other words, Chase Manhattan is reading the
phrase “annual aggregate” to apply to the calendar year rather than the financial assurance year which
is dependent, in Beazer’s case, upon Beazer’s fiscal year. I am asking that EPA clarify, based on its
interpretation of the regulations, that the total amount of liability being assured pursuant to the
December 26, 1996 letter of credit is, and should be, limited to $12 million.
The second issue reLates to the phrase “annual aggregate” and its use in combination with the
Language of the letter of credit which stares that the “expiration date shall be automatically extended for
a period (at least one year) on [ date] and on each successive expiration date...” 40 C.F.R.
§264.151(k). Chase Manhattan is reading the combination of these two provisions of the letter of
credit to mean that the liability accrued each year is “ annually ” aggregated (i.e., summed) with each
year the letter of credit is automatically extended. Thus, if the letter of credit is automatically extended
on December 26, 1997 for another year, the bank’s exposure will be equal to $24 million (or $36
million depending on EPA ’s interpretation of the first issue addressed above) and when that letter of
credit expires but then is automatically renewed on December 26, 1998, the bank’s exposure will
increase by another $12 million, and so forth. Unless EPA clarifies that the exposure for the current
letter of credit ends on December 26, 1997 and a new exposure of only $12 million begins
automatically upon extension of the letter of credit, Chase Manhattan has indicated that it will terminate
the letter of credit on its anniversary date and annually reissue a new letter of credit in its place.
It is Bea.zer’s belief that this is precisely the type of administrative burden which the Agency
intended to avoid by providing in the regulations that the letter of credit is automatically extended.
Beazer further believes that the Agency intended the use of letters of credit to serve as an alternative to
claims-based insurance policies which became less available during the mid-1980s. 53 Fed. Reg.
33938, 33939 (September 1, 1988). Therefore, it is Beazer’s position that just as annual aggregate
levels of insured liability would not be additive which each year that a policy is in effect, the annual
aggregate level assured by a letter of credit cannot be construed to be additive with each year that it is
renewed. We ask that EPA address this narrow issue and clarify that, notwithstanding the automatic
renewal provisions, Chase Manhattan’s exposure under its letter of credit is limited to $12 million in
any given year.

-------
beth Cotsworth
March 19, 1997
Page 3
Through my conver tions with Dale Ruhter, I understand that it may take several weeks for
the Agency to develop its response to this letter. Because of the timely nature of the issues presented, I
am asldng that the Agency take all possible steps to expedite its review of these issues.
I appreciate your attention to this miner and look forward to your response. Should you need
further information, please contact me at (412) 208-8832.
Sincerely,
Billie S. Plaherty
: Dale A. Ruhter, US EPA

-------
bcx : Karen Maiice
.1111 Blundon
Keith Terreri
Jonathan Nicholls

-------
I0
t 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL. PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460

9481.1997(01)
FEB 26 1997 OF *CEO
SOLSO WASTE AND EMEPGE1VCY RESPONSE
Mr. James M. Kuszaj
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, and Stewart, P.C.
Suite 511
4101 Lake Boone Trail
Post Office Box 31608
Raleigh. North Carolina 27622
Dear Mr. Kuszaj:
Thank you for your recent inquiry concerning interpretation of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) groundwater monitoring regulations (40 CFR Part 264,
Subpart F). Please note that States approved to implement the RCRA program can exercise more
stringency than the Federal government in promulgating standards or in issuing permits, and that
you should work directly with the appropriate State agency to address your questions. However,
we have prepared answers to your questions assuming that the State regulations are identical to
the Federal standards.
I. Can Appendix LX constüuen:s that are not also Appendix Viii constituents, be made par: of a
facility ‘s groundwater protection standard under 40 CFR §264.92, §264.93. or §264.94?
Interpretation: Appendix VIII to 40 CFR Part 261 lists chemicals that have been shown in
reputable scientific studies to have toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, or leratogenic effects on
humans or other life forms. Appendix IX to 40 CFR Part 264 is a list of constituents that can be
analyzed for in ground-water samples, and that serve as reliable indicators of ground-water
contamination. EPA ’s strategy in developing the Appendix IX rule generally limited setting
ground-water protection standards and requiring corrective action to chemicals listed on
Appendix VIII (SI FR 26637; July 24, 1986). Constituents subject to the ground-water
protection standard requirements are all members of the categories of constituents listed on
Appendix VIII.
Appendix IX to Part 264 is made up of those compounds on Appendix VIII to Part 261
for which it is feasible to analyze in ground-water samples, plus 17 chemicals that are routinely
monitored for in the Superfi.znd program (52 FR 25943; July 9, 1987). Thus, the Appendix IX
constituents not generally subject to the ground-water protection standard requirements are the
17 constituents routinely monitored for in the Superflznd program. However, if any of these 17
constituents (or other constituents) are detected in ground water, and the Regional Administrator

-------
-2-
decides that they are a threat to human health or the environment, then he or she may use the
“omnibus” authority of 40 CFR Part 270.32(b)(2) and section 3005(c)(3) of RCRA as amended,
to set ground-water protection standards and require corrective action.
2. Under 40 CFR §264.99(g). f the owner or operator finds Appendix LX constituents that are
not also listed Appendix VIII constituents in the ground-water, and these newly idenrffled
constituents are not already identified in the permit as monitoring constituents, are those
constituents automatically added to the ground-water protection monitoring standards under 40
CFR §264.99?
interpretation: These “newly identified” constituents may be added to the ground-water
protection standard requirements by use of the omnibus authority (cited above) or section
3005(c)(3) of RCRA as amended, only after the Regional Administrator decides that they pose a
threat to human health or the environment.
3. Who has the burden ofproving that an Appendix IX constituent that is not also an Appendix
VIII constituent should be excludedfrom the list of hazardous constituents spec j/ied in the
ground-water protection standard in the facility ‘s permit?
Interpretation: If a constituent not on Appendix VIII is detected in ground-water, the Regional
Administrator may include the constituent as a hazardous constituent to which the ground-water
protection standard applies if’ he or she decides that the constituent poses a threat to human health
or the environment.
4. If the Regional Administrator, relying on the authority in §264.99(g ), included an Appendix
LX’ constituent that is not also an Appendix VIII constituent on the ground-water protection
standard ofa facility’s permit, but has made no finding under 40 CFR §2 70. 32(b)(2), what is the
proper procedure to have that constituent removed from the permit?
interpretation: A permit modification would need to be issued to remove the constituent from
the permit. The permit modification procedures are described at §270.42.
5 ls an Appendix L X constituent that is not also an Appendix VIII constituent eligible for a
variance under 40 CFR §264.93(b) or an alternate concentration limit under 40 CFR §264.94?
If not, what is the procedure for asking for an alternate concentration limit for such a
constituent?
interpretation: if a constituent not on Appendix V III is detected in ground-water and the
Regional Administrator has included the constituent as a hazardous constituent to which the
ground-water protection standard applies, then the constituent should be eligible for a variance
under 40 CFR §264.93(b) or an alternate concentration limit under 40 CFR §264.94. EPA issued
Alternate Concentration Limit Guidance in July 1987(OSWER Directive 948 l.00-6C; EPA/530-

-------
-3-
SW-87-01 7) and May 1988 (OSWER Directive 9481.00-11; EPA/530-SW-87-031). Copies of
these guidance documents can be obtained by calling either the RCRA Hotline (800-424-9346)
or NTIS (703-987-4650).
I hope that you find these responses to your questions helpful. You may call Vernon
Myers (703-308-8660) if you have any further questions.
Sipcerely yours,
Iizabeu otswo , Acting Director
Offic e9Solid Waste

-------
LAW OFFICCS
OGLETREE, DEAk INS , NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
SUITE $11
4101 LAKE BOONE TRAIL
POST OFFICE BOX 31608
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622
TELEPHONE (9191 787-9700
FACSIMILE (9191 783-9412
OTHER O tCCS.
AI.OANV. NEW VOR
ATLANTA. GEORGIA
CHARLESTON. SOUT ’4 CAROLINA
January 31, 1997 COLUMBIA. SOUTH CAROLINA
GREENVILLE. SOUTH CAROLINA
HOUSTON. TEXAS
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE
WASHINGTON. 0 C
WINSTON SALCN. NORTH CAROLINA
Michael H. Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code: 5301
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I am writing to request the Agency’s interpretation of certain groundwater regulations in
40 CFR Part 264, Subpart F. My specific questions relate to how certain Appendix IX
constituents become part of the groundwater protection standard in a facility’s RCRA permit.
The questions, proposed interpretations and supporting discussions are set out briefly below.
Questions 4 and 5 have no suggested interpretations.
Question 1: Can AppendL IX constituents that are not also Appendix VIII constituents,
be made part of a facility’s groundwater protection standard under 40 CFR §264.92, §264.93
or §264.94?
Interpretation I: No. Appendix IX constituents that are not also Appendix VIII
constituents may not be added to a facility’s groundwater protection standard under the provisions
of 40 CFR Part 264. Subpart F. However, if one of these chemicals is detected in groundwater
and the Regional Administrator can document a threat to human health or the environment, he
may use the “omnibus” authority of 40 CFR §270.32(b)(2) and Section 3005(c)(3) of RCR.A to
set a groundwater protection standard.
Discussion: When EPA first promulgated the groundwater protection provisions of 40
CFR Part 264, Subpart F, those provisions only referenced constituents on Appendix VIII [ see
47 Federal Register 32274, July 26, 1982]. Thus, only Appendix VIII constituents could be
included as hazardous constituents in a facility’s groundwater protection standard under 40 CFR
§264.93. In 1987, EPA revised Subpart F to replace some but not all references to Appendix
VIII in Subpart F with references to Appendix IX. However, the reference to Appendix VIII in
40 CFR §264.93 was never changed.
c yi

-------
Michael H. Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
January 31, 1997
Pate 2 of 3
Appendix IX contains some chemicals that are routinely monitored in the Superfund
program but are not listed as Appendix VIII constituents. In the preamble to the proposed rule
adding Appendix IX, EPA explained that the constituents of Appendix IX that are not also
Appendix VIII constituents would not be added to the groundwater protection standard by virtue
of 40 CFR Part 264, Subpart F, but must be addressed under the omnibus provisions of 40 CFR
§270.32(bX2) [ SI Federal Register 26637, July 24, 1986].
Question 2: Under 40 CFR §264.99(g) ( the owner or operator finds Appendix IX
constituents that are not also listed Appendix VIII constituents in the groundwater and these
newly ident,:fled constituents are not already ident fled in the permit as monitoring constituents,
are those constituents automatically added to the groundwater protection monitoring standards
under 40 CFR §264.99?
Interpretation 2: No. Under 40 CFR §264.99(a), only hazardous constituents identified
under 40 CFR §264.93 can be specified as part of the groundwater protection standard. The
hazardous constituents identified in 40 CFR §264.93 are only those in Appendix VIII, not
Appendix IX. The Administrator may add Appendix IX constituents that are not also Appendix
VIII constituents to the groundwater protection standard, but he must first make a fmding under
40 CFR §270.32(b)(2) that the adc ition of such constituents are necessary to protect human health
and the environment. Appendix IX constituents that are not also Appendix VIII constituents are
not automatically added to the groundwater protection standard by virtue of 40 CFR §264.99(g).
Question 3: Who has the burden of proving that an Appendix IX constituent that is
not also an Appendix Viii constituent should be excluded from the list of hazardous
constituents spec fled in the groundwater protection standard in the facility’s permit?
Interpretation 3: Since the Regional Administrator may add Appendix IX constituents
that are not also Appendix VIII constituents to a facility’s permit only by virtue of 40 CFR
§270.32(b)(2), the Regional Administrator would have to justify the inclusion of such a
constituent on the basis that it is necessary to protect human health and the environment.
Question 4: If the Regional Administrator, relying on the authority in 40 CFR
§264.99(g), included an Appendix DC constituent that is not also an Appendix VIII constituent
on the groundwater protection standard of a facility’s permit but has made no finding under
40 CFR §2 70.32(b) (2) , what is the proper procedure to have that constituent removed from the
permit?
Interpretation 4: None suggested.

-------
Michael H. Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Prcnection Agency
January 31, 1997
Page 3 of 3
Question 5: Is an Appendix JX constituent that is not also an Appendix VIII
constituent eligible for a variance under 40 CFR §264.93(b) or an alternate concentration
limits under 40 CFR §264.94? If not, what is the procedure for asking for an alternate
concentration limit for such a constituent?
Interpretation 5: None suggested.
If you have any questions, please call.
Yours truly,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
fl
J esMKuszaj
jIg wp5 I ct\q&a.Itr

-------
1. Groundwater Monitoring: Appendix
IX Sampling and Off-site Releases
The groundwater monitoring regulations
at 40 CFR Part 264. Subpart F. require
owners or operators offacilfties with
permitted regulated units (Le., hazardous
waste landfills, waste piles. sutface
impoundments, or land treatment units) to
establish a detection monitoring program.
During deIec4on monitoring, owners or
operators observe indicator parameters to
determine if there has been statistically
sign jficant evidence of a release of waste
constituents from their regulated unit(s)
(p264.98(a)). Upon determining that such
evidence of a release exists, the owner or
operator is required to notz)Sj the Regional
Administrator in writing within seven days
and immediately sample the growidwazer for
the constituents listed in Part 264. Appendix
IX ( 264.98(g)(l) and (2)). According to
§264.98(g)(6), an owner or operator may
demonstrate that the contamination originated
from a source other than thefacility’s
regulated unit(s). If an owner or operator
were planning to demonstrate that the source
of the release was off-site would he/she still be
required to conduct sampling for Appendix IX
constituents?
If the statistical methods specified in the
facility’s permit validate evidence of a release
to groundwater, §264.98(g)(2) requires the
owner or operator to immediately sample for
Part 264, Appendix IX, constituents.
However, a single failure of a statistical test
does not necessarily constitute evidence of a
release from a regulated unit because of the
high false positive rates associated with single
test methods. Yet while complete Appendix
IX sampling would be required after the
specified statistical method (the initial test and
any retests) indicates a release of waste
constituents from regulated units, the owner/
operator may specify a statistical method
which features test and retest phases and
background levels that can indicate whether or
not the release is from the facility’s regulated
unit(s). In some situations, a facility may be
able to demonstrate that the contamination
came from an off-site source before declaring
evidence of a release statistically significant.
For assistance, owners or operators can look
to their implementing agency or groundwater
statistics documents such as Statistical
Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at
RCRA Facilities , PB89-151 047, and
Statistical Training Course for Groundwater
Monitoring Data Analysis , EPA53O-R-93-003.
MONTI-ILY HOTLINE REPORT
March 1997
948 1. 1997(02)

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Volume 8
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 8

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D C 20460
‘4 A
4 L sOl ’
9483. 1997(0 1)
jQQ7 OFFICE OF
# r !c u • SOLID WASTE AND EME GENC’
RESPONSE
Mr. John T. Salkowski
Environmental Projects
Solite CorporationS
P.O. Box 228
Ashland, VA 23005
Dear Mr. Salkowski:
Thank you for your letter of March 19, 1997 describing the use of silica fume lightweight
aggregate (SFLWA) concrete liners as secondary containment structures in hazardous waste tank
systems. Your letter noted that SFLWA concrete liners were installed at two permitted
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities, and that both installations were approved by the State
of Virginia, a State authorized to implement the RCRA program. Your letter also requests EPA
confirmation that SFLWA concrete liner systems would meet the secondary containment system
requirements in other States.
Concrete structures are used widely for secondary containment of hazardous wastes.
Although these structures can be expected to perform well, we expect owners and operators to
address several unique problems that may be encountered when using concrete. These problems
include settling, cracking, permeability, and detectability of cracks or leaks. In general, we
believe that concrete structures, if properly designed, installed, and maintained, are acceptable as
secondary containment structures. We are unable to determine, from the information provided,
whether SFLWA concrete liners meet the Federal criteria for secondary containment in any given
circumstance.
Finally, we cannot provide confirmation that the liners would be acceptable in other
States. Because authorized States m y have more stringent regulations than the Federal
program, we recommend that owners and operators of facilities considering SFLWA concrete
liners for secondary containment contact their respective States regarding the applicable
regulations.
- D.—, Da ,-!. tMe (I ’c. IrlIr in 1I , P dedP3DecI4O°.Poswor.cujr,*r.

-------
We appreciate your interest in developing and using innovative secondary containment
structures. If you have any further questions, please contact Jeff Gaines of my staff at
(703) 308-8655.
Sincerely,
a
( Auibeth A. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste
cc: Steve Heare, PSPD
Sonya Sasseville, PSPD

-------
c__I ”
F .0. BOX 228 • ASHLAND • VIRGiNIA 23005 ‘ PHONE 804 798-7981
March 1% 1997 CERTini D MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Michael Shapiro 1 Director
Office of Solid Waste
USEPA
401 M Street 1 SW.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
We at Solite Corporation have recently installed high strength (> 5000 psi) silica fume
lightweight aggregate (SFLWA) concrete liner systems in two fully permitted RCRA Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities ( SDF) in compliance with 40 CFR 264.190, Standards for
Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,
Subpart J - Tank Systems. Both installations were approved by the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, fully authorized to implement RCBA Programs. The high strength
SFLWA concrete liners are essentially impermeable and axe highly resistant to chemical attack
from the wastes stored in the tanks within the containment systems. The systems are installed
with chemical resistant water stops in place at all construction joints. This type of liner is frr
superior to coatings or linings used in industrial applications because the SFLWA high strength
concrete liner: 1) is not degraded t y ultra-violet radiation or chemical compounds, 2) has
exceptional resistance to freeze/thaw conditions, and 3) will not puncture or tear when exposed
to bea y duty industrial service.
Since installing the high strength SPLWA concrete liners, we have recently received many
inquires as to the application of such a system in other states and the status of EPA’s approval
of its use. We believe the SFLWA concrete liner system, when properly installed, exceeds the
requirements of 40 CFR 264.190 and provides long term advantages over traditional troweled or
painted coatings. Therefore. we arerequesting EPArS cnnflrmaffrm of the acceptability of thjs
jype Lliner system to meet the Subpart J secondary contain nent ftn1 requirements in othr
states .
We appreciate your assistance in this matter, and look forward to hearing from you in the near
future. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact inc at (804) 798-
7981.
Sincerely,
John T. Salkowski /
Manager, Environmental Projects 4 2 2e; #/‘f 97
S S S —
on oc cw ’ I’ q et

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
0
9483.1997(02)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Jill A. Weller
Thompson, Hine, & Flory P.L.L.
312 Walnut St.
Suite 1400
Cincinnati, OH 45202-4029
Dear Ms. Weller:
This letter is in response to your June 16, 1997 letter to Timothy Fields regarding the
applicability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) regulations to indoor piping and
flow equalization tanks used to convey solvents from spray painting booths to exterior
accumulation tanks.
Your letter contains the following description of your client’s circumstances. As we
understand it, your client uses solvent to clean automated spray painting guns when changing
paint color. The waste solvent is regulated as DOOl (Characteristic of Ignitability) or, on
occasion, F003 (spent solvents listed in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.31).
During cleaning used solvent is collected in funnels and then piped to a “flow equalization” tank
located near the booth, and then finally piped to an outdoor above-ground accumulation tank
which is equipped with secondary containment and is managed pursuant to the requirements at
40 CFR 262.34. The requirements at §262.34 require that generators accumulating waste in
tanks comply with the provisions of Part 265 Subpart J. You ask whether EPA considers flow
equalization tanks and associated indoor piping to be part of a manufacturing process unit and its
associated non-waste-treaUnent manufacturing unit. Waste contained in manufacturing process
units and associated non-waste-treatment manufacturing units is exempted under 40 CFR
26 1.4(c) until it is removed. You also ask whether the indoor portions of the unit are subject to
regulations such as the requirements for secondary containment found at 40 CFR Subpart J, and
the air emission requirements of 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart BB.
Based on the information provided in your letter, the Agency believes that the used
solvent is a waste once it leaves the spray painting unit, and that the equalization tank and
Vegetable OU Based InI on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Poetconsumer)

-------
associated piping are subject to hazardous waste regulatory requirements. Since the used solvent
is physically removed (i.e., piped) from the spray painting unit, and since it will no longer be
used to clean spray paint guns once removed, the solvent is considered a waste when it leaves the
unit. All tank system components (the equalization tank, outside accumulation tank, and all
associated piping) are part of the waste storage tank system and are subject to the relevant
generator accumulation requirements including those for secondary containment unless
otherwise exempted for reasons described at 40 CFR 265.193(f), (g), and (h). The exemption at
261.4(c) applies where waste is generated and then contained for some period of time within
process units (typically tank-like units), such as sludge that accumulates on the bottom of raw
material product tanks. However, the system you have described is not part of the production
system, but serves solely to manage wastes.
We suggest that you contact yot4tate agency with questions you may have about a
specific location or about the specific q. t s described in your letter since this letter is a general
interpretation of the federal regulation nd your authorized state agency is responsible for
interpreting its own regulations and making site specific rekulatoiy determinations. Should you
have any questions about the contents of this letter, please contact Jeff Gaines at (703)308-8655,
or Ann Codrington at (703)308-8825. Thank you for your interest in the safe management of
hazardous waste.
Sincerely,
Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
THOMPSON
i -I I N E & F LO RY P. L.L
Alfornvys .11 Law
June 16, 1997
Jill A. Weller
(513) 352-6678
jweller@thf.com
________ 3f
VI&i EDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr. O1
Acting Assistant Administrator 1 hi’ —
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response 4 t02.
401M St., SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Mr. Fields:
I am writing on behalf of a client to request your interpretation of which RCRA standards, if
any, apply to indoor piping and flow equalization tanks used to convey solvents from spray
painting booths to exterior accumulation tanks. The solvents at issue are used to “purge” or
clean out spray painting guns. In particular, I have been asked to evaluate whether such indoor
piping and equalization tanks are subject to the secondary cont thiment requirements of 40
C.F.R. Part 265, Subpart J, and the air emission restrictions of 40 C.F.R. Part 265, Subpart
BB.
In researching this issue, I have identified two possible and contradictory conclusions. In
addition, I have learned that several U.S. EPA Regions and RCRA-authorized states have also
addressed this same issue and have formulated inconsistent interpretations of the same relevant
rules. Upon the recommendation of Ms. Vicki Patton of U.S. EPA’s Office of General
Counsel, I am asking your assistance in providing U.S. EPA’s written guidanc’e concerning
this issue, which is more Ibily described below.
FAC I’S
The facilities at issue are located in a state that has been authorized by U.S. EPA to implement
its program in lieu of the federal RCRA program. The state’s ha rdou waste regulations are,
in relevant part, identical to the federal regulations. The state did not develáp an independent
rationale for its hazardous waste regulations, and has not rendered an opinion concerning the
issues addressed in this letter.

-------
THOMPSON
l-IINE& FLORY LIP
Afloriirys .i Law
THOMPSON, HINE & FLORY LLP
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr.
June 16, 1997
Page 2
My client’s issues relate to the handling of purge solvents associated with the operation of paint
spray booths at the client’s facilities. The facilities were designed and built to include fully
automated, integrated paint application systems. The core of these systems are paint booths
equipped with robotic paint spray applicators. In order to accommodate color changes, the
booths’ paint spray applicators are cleaned several times a day by flushing (or “purging”) with
a solvent. (This solvent, when discarded, would be regulated as DOOl h , rdous waste or,
less typically, as F003 h rdous waste.) During cleaning, the paint spray applicators within
the booth are directed to funnels within the bdoth which collect the purge solvent. The used
purge solvent is then piped from the funnels to a flow equalization tank located near the booth,
then piped through the plant to an outdoor above-ground accumulation tank. The outdoor tank
and any associated outdoor piping are either equipped with secondary cont2inment or
otherwise comply with 40 C.F.R. Part 265, Subpart I. Portions of the piping and flow
equalization tanks located inside of the building are not equipped with secondary contninment.
The facilities at issue are large quantity generators which accumulate h rdous wastes for 90
days or less in the outdoor storage tanks . The facilities are subject to 40 C.F.R. Part 265,
Subparts J, BB, and CC solely by virtue of their 90-day accumulation pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §
262.34(a)(I). The facilities are not TSD facilities otherwise subject to the full h i rdous waste
facility standards.
I am requesting your consideration of the following issues:
1. Do the paint spray booths and associated indoor piping and flow equalization tanks
constitute “manufacturing process units” and/or “associated non-waste-U eaflnent-
manufacturing units” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 261.4(c) so that the purge solvent is
exempt from regulation until it “exits the unit in which it was generated,” that is, when
it exits the piping and enters the accumulation tnuks ?
2. If any indoorportionsofasolventcollectionsYstemaredeemedtObePartOfa”taflk
system” subject to regulation under the hazardous waste facility standards, is this indoor
ancillary equipment subject to the secondary cont imnent requirements of 40 C.F.R.
Part 265, Subpart J, and the air emission requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 265, Subpart
BB?

-------
THOMPSON
H IN FLORY LLP
Atton eys as Law
THOMPSON, HINE & FLORY LLP
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr.
June 16, 1997
Page 3
ANALYSIS
40 C.F.R. § 261 .4(c) provides that a ha7ardous waste which is generated in a manufacturing
process unit or an associated non-waste-treatment-manufacturing unit is not subject to
regulation until the waste exits the unit in which it was generated. U.S. EPA’s rationale for
this provision is set forth in the Federal Register preamble:
Except where the unit is a surface impoundment or is not operating.. . , the
Agency believes that the h 7ardous waste generated in such a unit should only
be subject to regulation when it is removed from the unit. In most.cases, it is
only after the removal of ha,ardous wastes from these units that the wastes have
the potential for releasing ha,ardous constituents into the environment and
posing a substantial ha ard to human health or the environment.
45 Fed. Reg. 72025 (Oct. 30, 1980).
Neither the term “manufacturing process unit” nor the term “non-waste-treatment-
manufacturing unit” is defined in the regulations or the Federal Register preamble.
Furthermore, I have found no judicial or administrative decisions which interpret the terms.
However, over the years U.S. EPA has addressed the definition of “process unit” in the context
of other rule development. For example, in the context of the “ha rdous organ c NESHAP”
or “HON” nile, “process unit” is defined as follows:
Process Unit means the group of equipment items used to process raw materials
and to manufacture a product. For the purposes of this subpart, process unit
includes all unit operations and associated equipment (e.g., reactors and
associated product separators and recovery devices), associated unit operations
(e.g., extraction columns), any feed and product storage vessels, and any
transfer racks for distribution of final product.
40 C.F.R. § 63.191(b), 61 Fed. Reg. 31442 (June 20, 1996).1 Applying this definition to the
paint application system, the solvent piping and flow equalization tanks could be characterized
There is no substantive difference between the VOC equipment leak requirements of the Subpart H of.
the HON rule and those set forth in the RCRA Part 265, Subpart BB rules. In fact, U.S. EPA allows compliance
with Subpart H in lieu of Subpart BB. 61 Fed. Reg. 31437 (June 20, 1996).

-------
THOMPSON
H INE & F LORY LLP
AttorI!eys s Latv
THOMPSON, HINE & FIORY LLP
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr.
June 16, 1997
Page 4
as “associated equipment” or “associated unit operations” which are part of the same process
unit as the paint booths themselves.
U.S. EPA has also discussed the related issue of “point of generation” of waste materials in
several rulemaking contexts. See, e.g., 60 Fed. Reg. 11702, 11715 (March 2, 1995) (Phase
III LDR); 55 Fed. Reg. 22520, 22652 (June 1, 1990) (Phase Ill LDR); 61 Fed. Reg. 43698,
43711 (Aug. 26, 1996) (HON rule). These discussions have tended to underscore the inherent
difficulty of this concept. Id. Probably the simplest and most relevant discussion of this
concept is set forth in the original preamble to the 1980 final RCRA regulations. Here, U.S.
EPA stated that a material- becomes a characteristic waste, as a practical matter, “whenever the
management of the solid wastes would potentially be subject to EPA’s Part 262 through 265
regulations.” The Agency offered two examples where waste materials piped into tank or tank
trailer became subject to regulation only after the materials exited the piping and entered the
tank or trailer. 45 Fed. Reg. 33094-95 (May 19, 1980). Although these statements predate
the § 261.4(c) exemption, they seem to illustrate the Agency’s original intent concerning this
issue.
In light of 40 C.F.R. § 261.4(c) and U.S. EPA’s apparent stance on “point of generation,” I
believe that the my client’s indoor piping and flow equalization tanks are all part of a single
“manufacturing process unit,” since the paint spray booth, paint application process, gun
cleaning process, and solvent transportation pipeline constitute one uninterrupted production
process. In my client’s facilities, the solvent would not “exit the unit in which it was
generated” until the solvent exits the piping and is discharged to the 90-day accumulation tank.
Thus, under § 261.4(c), the piping and equalization tank.c would not be subject to regulation
under the § 262.34 accumulation rules or Part 265, Subpart I or BB. The accumulation tanks,
on the other hand , would constitute “ tank systems” subject to regulation under Part 265,
Subparts I, BB and CC.
Of course, the difficulty with the above interpretation is that Subparts J and BB apply not only
to tanks , but to “ancillary equipment.” The term “ancillary equipment” is defined as any
device, including piping, fittings , flanges, valves, and pumps, used to distribute, meter, or
control the flow of ha, ardous waste from its point of generation to a storage or treatment tank.
40 C.F.R. § 260.10. 40 C.F.R. § 265.193(f) states that unless ancillar3i equipment qualifies
for certain exemptions, such ancillary equipment “must be provided with full secondary
containment (e.g., trench, jacketing, double-walled piping)” that meets the requirements of §
265.193(b) and (c).

-------
THOMPSON
HINE &FLORYiLP
Attorneys at Law
THOMPSON, HINE & FLORY LLP
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr.
June 16, 1997
Page 5
U.S. EPA’s stated rationale for regulating ancillary equipment under Subpart J is its
determination that failures of ancillary equipment, including piping systems, constituted a
significant cause of documented releases from tank systems. 51 Fed. Reg. 25422, § ffl(B)(4)
(July 14, 1986); 50 Fed. Reg. 26444, § IV(E)(2)(b) (June26, 1995). However, the studies
supporting this determination appear to have been focused primarily upon outdoor and
underground tank systems, which are more subject to corrosion and the effects of the elements.
Id. Nowhere in the preambles to Subpart J does U.S. EPA cite actual or threatened releases of
ha,ardous waste to the environment from indoor, above-ground piping systems.
There are several legal and practical reasons why the § 261.4(c) exemption is the more logical
resolution to this issue. First, the simple fact that Subpart J regulates ancillary equipment
such as piping does not mean that § 261.4(c) does not apply to this equipment. U.S. EPA has
acknowledged the independent status of the § 261.4(c) exemption in other contexts, such as the
“third third” LDR rule, where the Agency emphasized:
The Agency notes that the issues in this rulemaking concerning when ha ardous
wastes become prohibited from land disposal do not change the status of other
regulatory or statutory inclusions or exclusions to the definition of solid or
hazardous waste found at 40 C.F.R. 261.2-261.6. These provisions can
override the LDR point of generation evaluation to keep wastes from being
prohibited and subject to a dilution prohibition or tteatment standard.
55 Fed. Reg. 22520 (June 1, 1990). Similarly, nothing in Part 265, Subpart J (or, for that
matter, Subpart BB) indicates that the new rules were intended to override, the § 261.4(c)
exemption. Such an intention would require an amendment to § 261.4(c) itself, since that rule
states that exempted materials are not subject to Part 265 at all.
Second, from the standpoint of protection of human health and the environment, the fact that
the pipes are part of one continuous automated paint application process within a facility
ensures against releases. I can think of no reason to regulate pipes and tanks which direct
purge solvent from the paint booths any differently from the equipment used to supply unused
paint and solvent to those booths. This is particularly the case with piping and flow
equalization tanks located within the building where, from an occupational safety standpoint,
the facility maintains the equipment to insure that spills and leaks do not occur.
Third, from a practical perspective, characterizing these pipes and flow equalization tanks as
something other than manufacturing process units could require a substantial flnan ial
expenditure. Not only is this cost very high, there is probably no corresponding environmental

-------
THOMPSON
HINE &FLORYLLp
At IernIy a: Law
THOMPSON, IUNE & FLORY LLP
Mr. Timothy Fields, Jr.
June 16, 1997
Page 6
benefit to be realized from applying secondary containment to piping located inside a well-
constructed building, where the possibility of releases to the environment is already very low.
As discussed above, these facilities have other incentives for keeping this piping as well
maintained as possible. If a leak occurs, it is dealt with quickly, without any potential for
impacting the environment. In contrast, the facility has explored other means of collecting and
transporting used solvents from the booth other than through pipes. One possibility is to
simply accumulate solvent in satellite containers which are periodically removed by forklift.
However, from the environmental protection and worker safety perspectives, this solution
involves far greater potential for harm than the reliable pipes. For instance, there is always the
possibility of a release from the satellite accumulation area as well as the h27ards of
transporting h27ardous wastes through the facility via forklift.
For all of the above reasons, I believe that the secondary containment requirements of Subpart
J and the emission restrictions of Subpart BB are inapplicable to my client’s indoor piping and
flow equalization tanks. However, if it is U.S. EPA’s position that Subpart J is applicable to
this indoor equipment, I would appreciate the Agency’s viewpoint on whether a building floor
constitutes secondary containment which meets the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 265.193. In
the alternative, if additional secondary containment is required and my client installs jacketing
or otherwise containing joints, valves, flanges, and connections, would the emission standards
of 40 C.F.R. Part 265, Subpart BB apply to those jacketed valves, flanges, and connections?
As you can appreciate, these issues are important to my client and I welcome your thoughts. I
look forward to receiving U.S. EPA’s assessment of these.issues. Once you have considered
the issues and consulted with other appropriate U.S. EPA staff, I would appreciate a letter
setting forth the Agency’s viewpoint.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these issues, please call me at (513) 352-6678 or
my colleague, Chris Walker, at (937) 443-6860. Thank you for your consideration and
guidance.
Sincerely,
(M
Jill A. Weller
JAW:kaf
cc: Christopher A. Walker, Esq.
Ms. Vicki Patton
Fields 1u 061397.wpd

-------
Volume 9
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 9

-------
Tbis Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9494.1997(01)
MAY 23 1997 OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Don R. Clay
Don Clay Associates
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Dea y.ClaY:
Thank you for your October 17, 1996 letter to Mike Shapiro concerning the regulatory
status of sulfur-containing secondary materials with a heating value greater than 5,000 Btu/lb
that are burned in a sulfuric acid furnace to produce virgin sulfuric acid. Based upon your letter
and subsequent conversations that we have had with your staff, I think it is necessary for me to
clarify a couple of points that Mike Shapiro, then the Director of the Office of Solid Waste, made
in a July 20, 1994 letter to Susan Ferguson of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC), which you referenced in your letter.
The July 20, 1994 letter referenced language under 40 CFR 266.1 03(a)(5)(ii)(B) which
states that a hazardous waste is burned for a purpose other than solely as an ingredient if the
hazardous waste has a heating value of 5,000 Btu/lb or more, as generated or as-fired. As we
stated in the July 20 letter, EPA’s interpretation of the plain language of 40 CFR
266. 1.03(a)(5)(ii)(B) is that Ii wdous waste with a 5,000 Btullb or greater heating value is
considered to be burned as fuel (i.e., burning for energy recovery).
Although the regulations clearly use a heating value of 5000 Btu/lb to differentiate
between a h ,i rdous waste being burned as an ingredient (or for metals recovery) and a
hazardous waste being burned for energy recovery, there is currently no regulatory provision
that uses a heating value of 5000 BtuIlb to determine whether a secondary material meets the
definition of solid waste (e.g., whether the material is a characteristic by-product being burned
for energy recovery). However, there has historically been a snong presumption that the burning
of. secondary materials, with a heating value of 5000 Btu or greater constitutes burning for energy
recovery and, in fact, we are considering codifying this in the upcoming definition of solid waste
rulemaking.
In closing, I would like to address another point that you raised in your letter concerning
the exclusion for spent sulfuric acid used to produce virgin sulfuric acid found at 40 CFR
261.4(a)(7). This exclusion applies only to spent sulfuric acid and does not include other sulfur-
containing materials.
wia Vegetae e Cd Based Inlis on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Pos consutner)

-------
Thank you for your letter and the time that you and your staff have spent discussing this
issue with us. If you have any additional questions, please contact either Michele Anders at
703/308-8850 or Stephen Bergman at 703/308-7262.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth)Cotsworth, Acting Director
Offic p( Solid Waste

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC11ON AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9488.1997(01)
JUL 30 1997 OFRCEOF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM :
SUBJECT: Respox se to Questions from California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Regarding Various I es the ombustion Hazardous Waste
FROM: 6E11 t TL.
Office of Solid Waste
TO: Julie Anderson, Director
Waste Management Division, Region IX
On July 24, 1995, the State of California sent a letterlo EPA, Region IX requesting
answers to the questions listed below. Region IX then forwarded the California letter to us for
response. The questions were subsequently discussed during various conference calls with the
Waste Combustion Permit Writers’ Workgroup. Based on these discussions and others within
OSW, we have prepared the following responses. However, I would like to point out that the
view of this Office is that, in most cases, the literal line between incineration and non-
incineration is not the main concern. Rather, the primary concern from an environmental
standpoint is whether proper controls are applied to the combustion or thermal treatment
process in question. The RCRA regulatory framework provides the authority and
responsibility to impose adequate controls.whether the unii is classified as a combustor or
miscellaneous unit. If you have any further questions or comments on these issues; feel free to
contict Andrew O’Palko of my staff at (703) 308-8646.
1. Can you clarify the meaning of “controlled flame combustion,” as specified in the
incineration definition? Does this imply that an engineered burner must be utilized to
generate “controlled flame?” We presume that an engineered burner is necessary for
“flame combustion” to be considered “controlled,” but would like confirmation.
Answer: Combustion is an exothermic chemical reaction involving the rapid thermal
oxidation of a substance. Controlled flame combustion refers to a steady-state, or near
steady-state, process wherein fuel and/or oxidizer feed rates are controlled. An
‘Punted w h Vegetab le 0 Based InI ol% 100% Recyded Paper (20% Poetconsumev)

-------
engineered burner is not necessarily needed in order for a combustion process to be
considered controlled. EPA does not specify the term “engineered burner” in the
regulatory definition for incineration devices. EPA notes there is not always a clear
distinction whether a particular process meets the definition of an incinerator. Some
processes need to be evaluated on a site-specific basis. Again, the important
consideration is that appropriate controls be applied to the unit.
2. Does EPA consjder fluidized bed h rdous waste oxidizers to be incinerators? in
these devices, the bed material (sand) is preheated via a burner device prior to the
introduction of waste. Subsequently charged waste is then oxidized in the bed after the
burner has been disengaged. Does this constitute a controlled flame system? Does the
physical state of the waste feed affect the classification of the unit (solids versus liquids
versus gases)?
Answer: Yes, EPA considers fluidized bed devices to be incinerators and regulated
under 40 CFR 264 (and 265) Subpart 0 (see 55 FR 17870, April 27, 1990). These
devices are considered a specialized form of controlled flame combustion in which the
fl n ie is dispersed throughout a fluidized bed. That is, fuel and oxidizer feed rates are
properly controlled so that combustion (i.e., rapid thermal oxidation) will occur
throughout the bed. The physical state of the waste feed would not affect the
classiflcation.of fluidized bed devices as incinerators.
3. U.S. EPA has stated that catalytic converters are distinct from controlled flame
afterburners (57 FR 38562). Can you clarify how such converters differ from
controlled flame afterburners? Catalytic converter units are able to oxidize wastes at
temperatures lower thpn that necessary for a typical flame unit due to the catalyst’s
ability to lower the energy necessary for the oxidation reaction to occur. What are the
criteria for distinguishing one from the other?
Answer: As stated in the question, a true catalytic converter is able to oxidize wastes at
temperatures lower than necessary for a typical flame unit. In addition, the catalytic
oxidation reaction is generally thought to take place at a much slower heat release rate
than normal combustion. Such a unit would generally not be considered a controlled
flame combustion device and, therefore, would,be regulated as a miscellaneous unit
under Subpart X ( 264.60O). One factor that indicates whether the device is regulated
under Subpart 0 or X is whether rapid oxidation (i.e., combustion) would cease
without the presence of the catalyst. If the reaction ceases without the äatalyst, then it
would be a Subpart X unit. In contrast, the use of a catalyst only to enhance traditional
combustion would not allow a classification as Subpart X.
2

-------
4. If a premixed, gaseous waste is processed in a device which uses a preheated chamber
at which the system is operated outside the limits of flammability, would this imply that
a controlled flame is not employed, and therefore it is not considered incineration? We
presume this to be the case but would like confirmation.
Answer: Controlled flame combustion is the defining character of incineration. If the
system discussed operates outside the limits of flammability, such that a flame is never
formed, it is reasonable to conclude that it is not an incinerator.
5. If a waste processing system produces a gas with commercial value, what restrictions,
if any, apply to the disposition of that material? For example, if a molten bath
processing system produces a synthesis gas, that gas could:
a) Be used as a feedstock for a chemical manufacturing process;
b) Be burned for its fuel value; or
C) Be flared.
Would any of these examples cause the process to be deemed incineration? We
presume that they would not cause the whole process to be considered incineration, but
would like confirmation. If the synthesis gas meets commercial product specifications,
is it free from subsequent ha,ardous waste regulations?
Answer: These issues are difficult to address generically since often the specific
operations at a particular site bear heavily on the final conclusions that are reached.
Historically, these types of issues have been handled on a case-by-case basis.
However, please be aware that it is the process, not the product, which determines a
unit’s classification. Also, if a syngas is hazardous waste derived, it is subject to
regulation if used as a fuel (see 62 FR 24253, May 2, 1997). .There are four policy
memoranda (attached) which can be used for assistance. These are: 1) Clarification
Regarding Single Pmicsion Point, Multi-Device Combustion Facilities, July 29, 1994
from Michael Shapiro; 2) Exide Corporation’s Proposed Fnn ing/Gasiflcatioà Unit,
November 15, 1994 from Michael Shapiro; 3) Application of the BIF Rule to Heritage
Environmental Services, December 30, 1992 from Sylvia Lowrance; and 4) an April
12, 1996 letter from Mike Shapiro to Molten Metal Technology with respect to
synthesis gas from Catalytic Extraction Processing.
In addition, the new MACT rule proposed a comparable fuels exemption for hainrdous
waste, which includes a syngas exemption based on a set of specifications for the gas
(see 61 FR 17465, April 19, 1996, •and 62 FR 24253, May 2, 1997). Syngas meeting
these specifications could be burned as a fuel without triggering RCRA obligatiáns. If
and when this exemption is implemented, it will, hopefully, miniTni7e the need for
these site-specific determinations.
3

-------
cc: RCRA Senior Policy Advisors, Regions 1-Vifi, X
Waste Combustion Permit Writers Workgroup
Norma Abdul-Malik, PSPD
Stephen Bei gman, HWID
Steve Silverman, OGC
Attachments (4)
4

-------
AflACHMENTS FOR THE CAL i FORNIA RESPONSE
1.) Clarification Regarding Single Emission Point, Multi-Device Combustion Facilities
FROM: Michael EL Shapiro TO: Allyn M. Davis
DATE: July 29, 1994 PPC No.: 9498.1994(08)
2.) Exide Corporation’s Proposed F inning/Gasification Unit
FROM: Michael H. Shapiro TO: Marcia Parisi Vickers
DATE: November 15, 1994 PPC No.: 9431.1994(02)
3) Application of the SlY Rule to Heritage
Environmental Services, Inc., Lemont Illinois
FROM: Sylvia K. Lowrance TO: Karl E. Bremer
DATE: December 30, 1992 PPC: 9498.1992(02)
4) Letter to Molten Metal Technology
FROM: Michael H. Shapiro TO: Randall A. Jones
DATE: April 12, 1996 PPC: 9432.1996(01)

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
9496.1997(01)
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
April 1997
3. Generator Storage Requirements for
Pzrt 266, Subpart F, Precious Metals
40 CFR Parr 266, Subpart F. outlines the
requirements for persons who generate,
transport. or Store recyclable marerials
tilizedforprecious metals recovery.
Hazardous wastes which contain economically
significant amou,zzs of the precious metals
gold. sih’er. platinum. palladiu,n. iridium.
osmium, rhodium. or ruthenium are covered by
these regulations when recta imned and are
considered recyclable materials. Generators
managing these recyclable materials are
required to not fj EPA of their hazardous
waste management activities, comply with the
use of the man fesr, and keep records to show
the materials are nor being accumulated
speculatively (p266. 70). If a generator is
accumulating recyclable materials to be
utilized for precious metals recovery, are they
required to store the materials in RCRA-
regulated management units (i.e., containers,
tan/cs. or containment buildings)?
No. A generator accumulating materials
that contain economically significant amounts
of precious metals under Part 266, Subpart F,
is not required to store the materials in RCRA-
regulated management units. EPA provided a
partial exemption from Subtitle C for wastes
containing precious metals because EPA
assumes that these materials will be managed
carefully due to their economic value. Since
hazardous wastes containing economically
significant amounts of precious metals are
handled carefully from the point of generation
to the point of recovery, the storage of these
wastes prior to reclamation is not subject to
full RCR.A Subtitle C regulation
( 26 1 .6(a)(2)(iii)). Although the precious
metals being reclaimed are not subject to
accumulation storage provisions, generators
are responsible for counting the waste when it
is generated in order to deteruiine how much
hazardous waste they generate each month (50
, 652; January 4. 1985).

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Io S7
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
I
—I
PRO1 ’
9497.1997(01)
MAY 30
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Ted Sears,Senior Consultant
The Technical Group, Inc.
1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 1000 West
Washington, D.C. 20005
Dear Mr. Sears:
Thank you for your letter of May 9, 1997 for clarification
of several federal hazardous waste regulations that affect the
transportation of lead-acid battery components that are shipped
off—site for reclamation. The federal regulations at issue were
promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under
the authority, of Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA).
In particular, your letter requests clarification of how the
federal hazardous waste regulations apply to the facts described
by the following scenario. Under the scenario described in your
letter, a facility (Facility A) generates spent lead—acid
batteries, which are characteristic hazardous wastes for both
their corrosive and lead contents. Facility A sends the spent
batteries to an unpermitted facility (Facility B) that breaks the
lead-acid batteries, thereby generating lead-acid battery plates.
Under this scenario, Facility B then sells the spent battery
plates (characteristic for lead under the RCRA Toxicity
Characteristic because they are coated with a lead sulfate
paste), to a permitted facility (Facility C)f or reclamation.
Facility B regularly transports the battery plate wastes to
Facility C without a hazardous waste manifest. It is then the
practice of Facility C to file an unmanifested waste report with
EPA or the authorized State upon receipt of an unmanifested
battery plate - shipment from Facility B. Your letter questions
whether this is an appropriate use of a RCRA unmanifested waste
report, and if not, whether one or more of the parties may incur
liability for engaging in this practice.
Under our reading of the text and history of the regulation
that allowed for unmanifested waste reports, the scenario
described in your letter would appear to constitute a violation
of the RCRA manifest regulations.
RCVCI.dlRscycIabI. .P’mled with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1QO% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumeri

-------
unmanifested wastes in particular areas. 45 FR at 33190. On
the issue of reporting frequency 1 the Agency noted specifically
that a 15-day turn-around time for unznanifested waste reports
would not be too burdensome, because the need for these reports
would arise only in those infrequent incidences where waste had
been illegally transported without a manifest. See 45 FR at
33191.
This regulatory history corroborates the position that
unmanifested waste reports are not intended to be routinely
submitted as an alternative to compliance with the manifest
system, and it supports the view that the filing of this report
does not relieve any party of duties otherwise arising under the
RCRA regulations. In fact, a pattern of filing unmanifested
waste reports would suggest that there has been a pattern of RCRA
violations, a fact which would have significance for enforcement
purposes
Therefore, under the Federal RCRA statute and regulations,
it would appear that, in the scenario described in your letter
for shipping spent battery plates, Facility B is in violation of
the requirement that a generator of hazardous waste prepare a
manifest to accompany its off-site shipments. If these facts
were established as true in an enforcement proceeding, and it
were further demonstrated that the battery plates were knowingly
transported withoutthe manifest, the case could rise to the
level of a criminal violation. See RCRA §3008(d) (5).
Additionally, I must note that the RCRA hazardous waste
requirements are generally implemented and enforced by State
agencies that have been approved by EPA as authorized State
programs. See R RA 53006 and 40 C.F.R. Part 271. Depending on
the jurisdiction involved, this conduct could also give rise to
civil or criminal violations under applicable State law.
Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I hope
that this response provides the clarification that you need. I
must emphasize, however, that this interpretation is based solely
on the facts as related to us in the hypothetical scenario
described in your letter. To the extent that the facts in a
specific case were to differ from this scenario, our
interpretation of the regulatory implicatibns could differ
as well. If you have any other questions, please contact
Michele Anders,. Chief of the Generator and Recycling Branch, on
(703) 308—8850.
Sincerely,
7/ /
L L-(
Elizab h A. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Off ice of Solid Waste

-------
IE TECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
May 9, 1997
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
Mail Code 5301W
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M. St., S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
RE: Manifest Requirements and Unmanifested Waste Renorts
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I write to request clarification of several components of the comprehensive h rdous
waste vn nifest system, on which the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s (RCRA)
cradle-to-grave m n ’gement system for h ,ardous waste significantly relies. I seek
written clarification that the manifest requirements for generators,’ transporters, 2 and
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs), 3 preclude a permitted TSDF from
knowingly receiving .froni an unpermitted facility irnm nifested battery plates from lead-
acid batteries, on a regular basis, even though it files an unm nifested waste report.
A generator that transports, or offers for transportation, ha’iardous waste for off-site
treatment, storage, or disposal must prepare a mmiifest according to specific instructions. 4
A transporter may not accept hw rdous waste from a generator unless it is accompanied
by a signed m2nifest. 5 A faàility that accepts for treatment, storage, or disposal any
h ,’rndous waste from an off-site source without an accompanying nrnnifest or without an
accompanying shipping paper (and the waste is not from a conditionally exempt s n l1
quantity generator and thereby excluded from the manifest requirement), must prepare
and submit a single copy of an “unmm’ifested waste report” to the Regional
Administrator within 15 days of receiving the waste. 6
40 C.F.R. Part 262, Subpart B.
2 40 C.F.R. Part 263, Subpart B.
40 C.F.R. Part 264, Subpart E.
40 C.F.R Section 262.20.
40 C.F.R. Section 263.20.
6 40 C.F.R. Section 264.76.
Environmental Consulting
1300 I STREET. NW • SUITE 1000 WEST • 5HINGTO ’& DC 20005
TELEPHONE (202) 962-8531 • FAX (202) 962-8599

-------
THE TECHNICALGROUP. INC.
Spent lead-acid batteries that are being reclaimed are considered recyclable materials and
are not subject to full Subtitle C regulation. 7 Specifically, persons who generate,
transport, or collect spent batteries, or who store spent batteries but do not reclaim them,
are not subject to full Subtitle C regulation. 8 It is my understanding that this exemption is
subject to at least the following two conditions: (1) the party generating, transporting, or
collecting the batteries may not reclaim the batteries; 9 and (2) the batteries must be whole
and intact, that is, not cracked or busted, or opened for purposes of separating their
original components (i.e., separating acid from battery plates).
Assume for purposes of responding to this request that a facility (Facility A) generates
spent lead-acid batteries and sends them to an unpermitted facility (Facility B), which
breaks these lead-acid batteries, generating lead-acid battery plates. Facility B then sells
the battery plates to a permitted TSDF facility (Facility C) for reclamation. Facility B
regularly transports the battery plates, nnmanifested, to Facility C. After receiving the
shipment, Facility C files an immanifested waste report with EPA.
I request written clarification of how the applicable regulatory requirements apply to this
situation based on the following question. May Facility B knowingly ship the plates
unmanifested to Facility C? May Facility C knowingly receive the unmanifested
shipments that contain battery plates, as opposed to whole, intact lead-acid batteries, with
the intention of filing an unmanifested waste report with EPA, thereby relieving Facility
B, through tacit understanding or otherwise, of the Subtitle C manifest requirements?
Does the filing of an unmanifested waste report cause Facilities B and/or C to incur
liability or render them subject to civil and/or criminal enforcement action?
I look forward to your response. If you or your staff have any questions, please call me at
(202) 962-8531.
Sincerely,
Ted Sears
Senior Consultant
The Technical Group, Inc.
40 C.F.R. Section 261 .6(a)(2)(iv).
40 C.F.R. Section 266.80.
Id.

-------
Volume 10
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 10

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
%tO SZ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
g WASHiNGTON, D.C. 20460
C
‘t ic
k PRO (#
9502.1997(01)
OFFICE OF
SOW WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Karen florini APR t t997
Senior Attorney
Environmental Defense Fund
1875 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Wasbin ton DC 20009
Dear M lorini:
Thank you for your letter of March 13, 1997 requesting clarification Cf
the Environmental Protection Agency’ a (EPA’ a) recent guidance on coordination
of Clean—up actions undertaken pursuant to the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensäta.Ot
and Liability Act (cERCLAJ. 1 am pleased to respond to your- quest ions on fate
and transport modeling during closure of RCRA regulated units and public
participation during RCRA corrective action. This response was coordinated
with EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
You expressed concern that the discussion of fate and transport modeling
in the RCRA/cERCLA memorandum might be used by facility owner/operators as
justification for leaving waste or waste residues in place during clean
closure. - I assure you, this is not the intent of the new fate and transport
policy.
By allowing appropriate use of fate and transport modeling during
clos%.tre of RCRA regulated units, EPA is not altering the fundamental,
unit—specific requirements for clean closure whicii, as discussed in the
March 19, 1987 Federal Resister notice cited in your letter, requa.re facility
owners and operators to “remove all waste and contaminated liners and to
demonstrate that any hazardous constitue nts left in the subsoil will, not cause
unacceptable risks to human health and the environment” (52 FR 8206]. The
1987 notice went on to discuss the Agency’s policy for demonstrating that any
materials contaninated with waste that are not removed do not present
unacceptable risks. The RCRA/CERCLh memorandum revises only the policy for
these demonstrations -— by allowi.ng’ appropriate use of fate and transport
modeling. It does not change the requirements for removal of all wastes.
The Agency is developing additional guidance to clarify this issue.
You also expressed concern about public participation during RCRA
corrective’ actions. I assure you that EPA remains committed to full, fair,
equitable and meaningful public participation in all of its environmental
programs, including the RCRA corrective action program. Our commitment to
public participation is the same whether corrective action is implemented in
the context of a ECRA permit or an enforcement order. Guidance on public
participation during RCRA corrective action can be found in the RCRA Public
Participation Manual , EPAS3O-96-0O7, September 1996. We have not developed
specific guidance on deferral to non-RCRA programs, and will continue to
consider your concerns as we address that-issue further.
with Vegetable Od Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconswner)

-------
In the meantime, where implementation of RCRA corrective action
requirements is deferred to a non—RCR.A clean—up program (e.g., a state
Superfund program), we fully expect that the non-RCRA clean-up program will
provide an appropriate level of public participation, e.g, at a minimum, offer
the affected community an opportunity to review and comment on any proposed
remedy. We note that decisions on deferrals to non—RCP.A programs are site-
specific, and that the amount and timing of public participation is one factor
EPA may consider when making deferral decisions.
In addition to public participation provided in a non-RCRA clean-up
program, the public has an opportunity to review and comment on whether it is
appropriate for the Agency to defer RCRA corrective action requirements to a
non-RCJ A program when: (1) a RCRA permit is issued; (2) modification of a RCRA
permit is proposed to reflect that corrective action requirements are
satisfied; or, (3) a permit is no longer needed (i.e., the facility has clean
closed all, regulated units) and permit denial is proposed to terminate interim
status. For example, if a deferral decision is made during the permitting
process, the public has an opportunity to review and comment on the deferral
decision, including the extent to which the contemplated non—RCRA clean-up
satisfies substantive corrective action requirements as well as whether it
affords an Ippropriate level of public participation, during permit issuance.
EPA encourages program implementors to, whenever appropriate, coordinate
and consolidate opportunities for public participation to minimize duplication
of effort and respect the time and resource constraints of ten, faced by
community groups. For example, in cases where corrective action has been
deferred to a state Superfund program, EPA encourages program implernentors to
combine public notice on proposed remedies with public notice (if appropriate)
of the proposed determination that the state superfund remedy will, satisfy
corrective action requ3,rements.
Thank you again for your inquiries into these matters, and for your
continuing interest in and assistance with the national RcRA program. I hope
these responses have resolved your concerns. If you require additional
information or have any follow—up questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me or Elizabeth McManus, of my staff, at (703) 308—8657.
Sincerely,
Acting Director
Waste

-------
E F
ENViRONMENTAl.
DEFENSE FUND
cQpual Office
1875Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 387-3500
Fax: 202-234-6049
March 13, 1997
Steven A. Herman
Assistant Administmtor,OECA
EPA
401 MStreet, SW
Washington, DC. 20460
Timothy Fields
Acting Assistant Administrator, OSWER
EPA
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Re: September 24. 1996 Memorandum
RegardingClosure and
Corrective Action
Dear Sirs:
I am writing to seek clarification of several aspects of your memorandum of
September 24, 1996 to RCRA/CERCLA National Policy Managers. As you know, EDF
has a long-standing interest in matters invoMng clean closure and corrective action,
and your memorandum raises several matters of great concern.
First, the memorandum purports to change 10 years of policy regarding clean
closures and now allow the use of fate and transport models to establish risk-based
clean closure lavels. However, the legal basis for this policy change is entirely unclear,
given EPA nehjerilnalized the closure changes proposed in March 1987.
Of parti iIar importance to EL)F is whether this change in policy applies both to
wastes and contaminated media, orcontaminated media only. While the contained-in
principle could theoretically provide some flexibility in applying the clean closure rules to
contaminated media, there s no apparent legal or policy basis for allowing wastes or
residues other than contarniriated mediato remain onsite under a clean closure
scenario. - -
of hazardous wastes, clean closure rules typically require the
257 Pazk Avenue South 5655 COllege Ave. 1405 Mapaboe Ave. 128East Hargett St. 1800 Guadilupe
New YoTk, NY 10010 Ø.frI nd• CA.94618 BonI 4 r . a) 80302 Raleigh, NC 27601 Austin. TX 78701
(212) 505-2100 (510) 658-8008 (303)440.4901 (919) 1-7793 (512) 478-5161

-------
owner/operator to uremove or udecontaminatehl all waste residues, actions not satisfied
by simply leaving the material in place. See 52 FR 8706 (March 19, 1987). Moreover,
as EDF has consistently argued in the ongoing debate regarding the scope of the
proposed HWIR-media rules, it is poor public policy to both encourage substandard
waste management practices and discourage source removal by providing incentives or
mechanisms aimed at avoiding comprehensive waste treatment and proper disposal
otherwise achievable at closure. Therefore, even where a tank, pile, or drip pad is
closed “as a landfill” (i.e., with some contaminated soils remaining in place) because it
is not “practical” to remove all contaminated soil, the Agency s closure rules still require
waste removal or decontamination first. See e.g., 40 CFR 264.197(b), 264.258(b),
265.445(b).
Accordingly, EDF seeks clarification as to whether the September 24
memorandum,or other Agency guidance contemplates or otherwise allows hazardous
waste or residues other than contaminated media to be left in place under EPA’s clean
closure rules on the basis of fate and transport modeling, and If so, the legal and policy
bases for the Agency position.
Second, the September 24 memorandum indicates federal or state regulatory
agencies may defer RCRA corrective actions where uequivalentD actions are underway
pursuant to state/tribal cleanup programs. However, it is unclear in the memorandum
whether these equiva1 ncy ” considerationsapply both substantively and procedurally.
Specifically, where the non-RCRA ai.ithorities do not provide for public
participation in all significant aspects of the cleanup process (i.e., provide for public
participation only at remedy selection or not at all), deferral to non-RCRA authorities
may result in a substantial loss of public participation rights and opportunities currently
provided under RCRA and its permit modification procedures. For example, the
opportunity to provide input on site investigations, feasibility studies, compliance
schedules; or to seek judicial appeal of final agency actions, may be lost under non-
RCRA authorities.
Under these circumstances, the RCRA and non-RCRA processes lack the
equivalency discussed in the September 24 memorandum. This scenario is not simply
a hypothetical concern, since state cleanup procedures (especially for voluntary
programs and/or programs relying upon enforcement authorities) do not uniformly
provide for public participation. The resulting loss of public participating rights would be
particularly inappropriate originating from an Administration heretofore committed to
advancing public participatign and environmental justice in environmental
decisionmaking.
Accordingly, EDF seeks clarification as to whether equivalent public participation
opportunities must be provided where RCRA corrective actions are deferred to non-
RCRA authorities, and if not, the legal and policy bases for authorizing such deferrals.
Given the importance of the issues raised by the September 24 memorandum,

-------
please provide a response to this letter within 30 days. Please feel free to contact me
or my colleague, David Lennett, at (207) 582-3826, if you have any questions or need
further information. I look forward to your response.
cc: Hugh Davis, OSW
David Lennett
Karen Florini
Senior Attorney

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
Volume 12
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 12

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION VIII
893 18th STREET. SUITE 600
DENVER. COLORADO 80202.2466
8P2-HW 9534.1997(01)
Mr. Marty Barth MAR 2 7 1997
Aptus
P.O. Box 27448
Salt Lake City, Utah 84127
Dear Mr. Barth:
Thcs letter is in response to your memorandum dated January 20, 1997, in which
you raised specific questions regarding the applicability of the Subpart CC RCRA air
emission regulations to the Aptus facility in Aragonite, Utah. My staff have discussed your
questions with the appropriate EPA headquarters offices (Office of Solid Waste and Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards) and have made the following determinations.
BULK SOLIDS TANKS .
a) The bulk oIids tanks are large rectangular open tanks located inside of a tall
building vented to the incinerator. The three large uroll up doors on this tall
building are not considered natural draft openings (NDO5) AS LONG as they are
normally closed during operation. They must be kept closed at all times that
hazardous waste is stored in the bulk solids tanks, other than when roHoffs are
actively being unloaded. In addition, any openings/cracks which are under, around
or above the closed door must be considered as NDOs when evaluating compliance
with Procedure T (40 CFR 52.741).
b) As correctly indicated in your memorandum, Tank Level 2 controls allow for a tank
to be located inside an enciosure that is vented through a closed-vent system to an
enclosed combustion device (264.1 084(d)(5)). The requirements for operation of
the control device (in this case the enclosed combustion device) do not apply
during periods of planned routine maintenance. Periods of planned routine
maintenance of the control device, during which the control device does not meet
the regulatory specifications, shall not exceed 240 hours per year. (264.1087(c)(2)).
On March 10, 1997, you provided us with documentation of the historical periods
of planned maintenance of the Aptus incinerator (enclosed.) We recognize that the
time periods needed for maintenance of a hazardous waste incinerator (such as for
rebricking of the kiln) are likely to exceed the 240 hours per year (10 days per year)
envisioned for typical air pollution control devices. The shortest time period for
planned maintenance at Aptus since 1993 appears to be for a total of 21 days in
1996 (15 days for rebricking and 6 days for bulk feed system work.)
PdnMd on Recycled P.pei

-------
In your memorandum of January 10, 1997, you proposed the use of an activated
carbon system as a backup control device, for those times when the incinerator is
not operating. Your proposal questioned the need for a backup Uenclosed
combustion device” such as a fume-incinerator, citing the high capital cost (probably
exceeding $500,000) for a backup device that would be used for short time periods.
In subsequent discussions regarding alternative solutions to this issue, you also
indicated that it would be difficult to ensure that these bulk solids tanks were empty
during all periods that the incinerator is shut down (thus not needing emissions
controls from the tanks during those times) because Aptus (like other commercial
facilities) would continue to receive wastes from offsite, and would need to store
such wastes.
The Subpart CC regulations specifically require that the enclosure be vented to an
enclosed combustion device; they do not allow for alternate systems such as
activated carbon. Also, they do not address the use of backup controls for
emissions from tanks in total enclosures; presumably during the allowed 240 hours
per year of planned maintenance, emissions from the tanks in the total enclosure
could be totally uncontrolled. Therefore, we believe that it would be as, if not more,
protective of the environment for Aptus to install and operate a backup activated
carbon system, to be used DURING ALL PERIODS that the incinerator is not
operating and hazardous wastes remain in the tank. The additional control of air
emissions during the 240 hours of allowed maintenance (as compared to no
control) would help offset any loss in emission control efficiency (enclosed
combustion device versus activated carbon) occurring during the ten or so
additional days during which the incinerator is not operating due to planned
maintenance. The closed vent system and backup carbon system must be
designed and operated in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 264.1087.
SLUDGE RECEIVING TANK
This outside tank has a fixed roof, and is connected to the incinerator and afterburner.
Aptus believes that this tank most closely complies with Tank Level 2 control requirements
allowing a tank vented through a dosed-vent system to a control device (264.1 084(d)(3)).
The tank has two large doors, that are opened for adding waste material to the tank
(sludge is added by being pumped from a tanker or by emptying from drums.) The Subpart
CC regulations indicate that whenever hazardouswaste is in the tank, the closure devices
must be secured in a closed position, other than during inspections, maintenance
sampling, sludge cleanout, etc. (264.1084(g)(2)). You questioned whether opening these
doors to add waste materials was acceptable, since the addition of waste is not specifically
cited as an exception to the closure device requirement.
The preamble to the Subpart CC regulation (page 59946 of the November 25, 1996
Federal Register notice) specifically discusses the transfer of solids and sludges between
containers and tanks. It indicates that such transfer of hazardous waste between a tank
PWnf.d on R.cy .d Pap

-------
and a container is not required to be done in a closed systemD; therefore, Aptus would not
need to construct a closed system for adding sludges via hard piping. However, Aptus
must limit the amount of exposure that waste in the tank has to the atmosphere, by
keeping the doors open only during periods of active waste addition. The doors should
not be left open between truck loads of waste being brought in, for example.
We hope that this response addresses your concerns. Because of the regulatory
interpretations developed for this response, we believe that the conditions and caveats
outlined in this letter should be included in the Aptus HSWA permiL Please call Mindy
Mohr at (303) 312-6525 or Carl Daly at (303) 312-6416 to discuss this response.
Si ceràly,
2? L1 . (d_4 ___-
Wanda C. Taunton, Director
Hazardous Waste Program
Enclosure
cc: James Michael, CSW
Michele Aston, OAQPS
Boyd Swenson, DSHW, UDEQ
PWnf.d.n R.cy .d Pap.,

-------
- -
To: EPA Region VIII, Ann. Mindy Mohr
From: Aptus, InC., Marty Barth
Date: March 101 1997
MEMO
&ibject: History of Scheduled Ma m Irnnee Requiriitg Plant Shutdown
The dates, time requirements, and purpose of downtimes arc listed below for scheduled
Tn irnPnR1’iCe since 1993. This infor adon is provided for docurn yvr rion of the required tune for
performing scheduled i I nt nance that requires the incinerator to be shut down.
Additionally, it is not in Aptus’ best interest to keep the facility shutdown any longer than is
necessary due to the impact on profitability, primarily resulting from limited customer waste
inventory space. Thus there is a s ong fin iicial incentive to minimi the number of days the
plant is not burning waste.
Date
April 1993
August 1993
October 1993
April 1994
September 1994
J nn ry 1995
April 1995
February 1996
December 1996
Purpose far Shutdown
kiln rebricking, baghouse work.
Baghouse, hot duct work
kiln rebricicing
desLagger d t i age repair
bag house, wet scrubber work
baghouse work
kiln rebrii*ing
kiln rebric1th g
bulk feed system work
Duration of Shutdown
20 days \
lOdays )!
2ldays /
l5days 32..
l7days J
9days 33
24days /
l5days ) 21
6 days
ød T TG
C i .Lfl SflJ4

-------
Volume 13
Addendum
Place the attached documents at
the end of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 13

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
January 1997
955 1.1997(01)
RCRA
1. Land Disposal Restriction
Notification Requirements for
Decharacterized Mixed Waste Sent
to an Atomic Energy Act Landfill
The land disposal restrictions (LDR) in 40
CFR Part 268 require that hazardous waste
prohibited from land disposal meet treatment
standards before it is placed in a landfill. A
prohibited characteristic waste that has been
treated to meet LDR standards (and to
eliminate the characteristic) may exit Subtitle
C hazardous waste regulation and be sent to a
Subtitle Dfaciliiy, provided the generator
sends a one-time not ficazion and certification
to the EPA Region or authorized state
(p268.9(d)). If a generator treats a prohibited
characteristic mixed waste, i.e., a waste that is
both hazardous and radioactive, and it is no
longer hazardous, should the one-time
not çflcation and cert fication still be sent to
the EPA Region or to the authorized state f
the waste is being sent to an Atomic Energy
Act (AEA) landfill?
The one-t ie notiflcatiàn and certification
should still be sent to the EPA Region or
authorized state. The one-time notification
and certification verifies that the waste has
been treated to meet ali applicable LDR
standards and indicates the site of ultimate
disposal since the waste is no longer subject to
Subtitle C regulation. RCRA §4004
specifically prohibits the open dumping of
solid waste. If the AEA landfill meets the
S ibtitle D criteria under 40 CFR Parts 257 or
258, which distinguish between sanitary
landfills and open dumps, then the
decharacterized mixed waste may be sent to
that facility.

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
January 1997
9551.1997(02)
RCRA
2. Land Disposal Restrictions Storage
Prohibition and Decharacterjzed
Wastes
A facility generates a prohibited
characteristic hazardous waste with a 40 CFR
§268.40 treatment standard requiring
decharaczerizarjon and treatment to meet the
§268.48 universal treatment standards (UTS)
levels before ii is eligible for land disposal.
The generator ships the waste to a hazardous
waste treatment, storage, and disposal facility
(TSDF). The TSDF decharaczerjzes the
waste, rendering it non-hazardous, but the
waste must still meet UTS levels prior to land
disposaL Is this decharacterized waste
subject to the RCRA land disposal restrictions
(LDR) storage prohibition now that it is no
longer hazardous?
The waste remains subject to the storage
prohibition even though it is no longer
hazardous. Under the LDR storage
prohibition, reszricted.hazardous wastes are
prohibited from being stored for purposes
other than the accumulation of quantities of
waste necessary to facilitate proper recovery,
treatment, or disposal ( 268.50). Wastes may
be stored for this purpose for up to one year,
unless the implementing agency can
demonstrate that such storage was not solely
for the purpose of accumulation ( 268.5O(b)).
The wastes may continue to be stored beyond
the first year, but the owner/operator of the
storing facility bears t(i&burden of
affirmatively proving that the waste is being
stored solely for the purposes of accumulation
( 268.50(c)).
Because the LDR program prohibitions
apply at the point of generation, the storage
prohibition applies until the waste is treated to
fully meet its assigned treatment standard (58
29872; May 24, 1993). As a result 1 even
though the characteristic waste has been
decharacterized, it remains subject to the
storage prohibition until fully treated to meet
UTS levels. Thus, ayear after the waste was
originally generated the facility storing the
waste will have the burden of proving that the
waste is still being stored solely to facilitate
accumulation of amounts necessary to
facilitate proper treatment, recovery, or
disposal.

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D C. 20460
CPROI 3 1997 9551.1997(03)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Edward F. Wandelt
Chief, Environmental Management Division
United States Coast Guard
2100 Second Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20593-000 1
Dear Mr. Wandelt:
This is in response to your letter datediYecember 19, 1996, in which you requested
confirmation that mercury batteries recovered qm th e water near aid th navigation (ATON)
structures satisfy the definition of debrià ndei4O CPR. 268.2 (g). If these batteries are
considered debris, they would be subjecrto special standards under the Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs) for debris at 4G CFW26R45 in lieu of otherwise applicable standards for
mercury wastes found in Section.26L40.
Upon careful review of the info rmatiOn you submitted, the Agency has determined that
these batteries satisfy thedefin nof suñd 4O CFR2682(g). ‘A a solid material
meeting the general debris criteria of that paragraph, the ñ,iin que 1on *hèth r the bá tteries in
question are excluded from the deflthtion sZ contaJpers”. We find that the exclusion from the
definition of debris for “...Intact containers of hazardous waste that are not ruptured and that
retain at least 75% of their original volume...” does not apply to the batteries you have described.
In the preamble which established this definition, EPA states that, “By ‘intact container’ ,
the Agency means a container that can still function as a container.” (57 FR 37225, August 18,
1992). Because the batteries, as you have described, are deteriorated and have holes which have
allowed material to flow into and out of the batteries, we conclude that the batteries are ruptured,
cannot function as containers, and therefore are not excluded from the definition of debris under
40 CFR 268.2 (g). As such, the batteries may be land disposed after treatment in accordance
with the standards for li 2rdous debris at 40 CFR 268.45. The Agency agrees that these
alternative debris standards are more appropriate to these batteries than the standards for

-------
non-debris mercury wastes, which would require either roasting or retorting (RMERC.) or
compliance with a TCLP standard. Clearly, the batteries in question do not seem
appropriate for retorting.
If you have further questions, please contact Shaun McGarvey of my staff at
703-308-8603.
Sincerely,
,2
James R. Berlow, Director
Hazardous Waste Management and Minimization
Division
2

-------
U.S. Department / G-SEC-3 2100 Second Street. S.W.
of Transportation! Unrted Stales Coast Guard Washington. DC 20593-0001
I Staff .Symbol:
United States
Coast Guard .— . CFA)C(202)267 -4219
11000
December 19. 1996
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Waste Treatment Branch
401 MStreet.S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. McGarvey:
M you may recall, we met in May of 1995 to discuss the Coast Guard’s ongoing battery removal program taking
place in the rivers and coastal waters across the country. During the meeting we discussed the status of the batteries
that are recovered from the water as hazardous wastes under RCRA. I have enclosed a brochure that further
describes our program. Although our battery removal program has been underway for over a year, several of the
Coast Guard’s waste disposal contractors have recently questioned whether these batteries actually qualify as debris
Under 40 CFR §268.45. Please let this letter serve to document the background infonnation concerning the batteries
and to act as the Coast Guard’s request for confirmation concerning applicability of the debris rule to batteries
recovered from the environment.
Background . The Coast Guard operates and maintains over 12,000 fixed, lighted aida to navigation (ATON)
structures throughout the waters of the United States. These devices assist mariners and help prevent accidents and
loss of life and property. These ATON are lighted and use batteries as a power source due to lack of availability of
commercial power. Before the mid- 1980’s, unrechargable primary batteries conixining a small amount of mercury
were used. Since that time, the Coast Guard has mounted a major solarization effort and now uses lead-acid batteries
in all but a few ATON. The new batteries have a much longer service life and are tracked continually throughout
their use.
Over the years, many primary batteries were deposited in the water near these ATON structures. Before 1973, there
was no internal Coast Guard guidance prohibiting this practice. In addition, boating accidents, bad weather, and
vandalism all contributed to the large number of batteries resting on the subsurface near many ATON.
Several years ago, some state regulatory agencies notified the Coast Guard of the existence of these batteries and we
began to mobilize our resources to remove them. Our first step was to conduct a study of the issue in order to
determine whether the batteries posed a health risk. Fortunately, the scientists eir nining this issue have determined
that the batteries posed little risk to hnm2n health or the environment. A copy of this scientific assessment (entitled
“The Fate of Mercury from ATON Batteries - A Report to the Volpe Center) of the risks posed by the batteries is
also enclosed.
The Coast Guard Batten’ Removal Program . The Coast Guard has embarked on an ambitious battery removal effort
that will take several years to complete. The ATON sites where batteries are potentially located have been
prioritized. We focused our initial efforts on coastal states in the Southeast where the problem was most evident.
The results of these efforts are most impressive. Approximately 400 tons of batteries have been removed from the
waters of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. We have also made considerable progress in other.states across the
nation. Altogether, approximately 650 tons of batteries have been recovered.
Recovered Batteries . It is difficult to make a general statement concerning the condition of the batteries being
recovered. In some cases, only portions of the plastic battery casing is found, other batteries are found intact
Photographs of typical batteries being recovered are also enclosed. The batteries generally contain water, sand, mud,
and some attached sealife. The batteries are manufhctured with air vent holes that allow the electrolyte Liquid or gel
to escape the battery which is replaced by external water, sediment, and other debris. The primary batteries being
recovered do contain a small amount of mercury. What remains of the mercury is in an elemental form bonded to the
batter s zinc anode during the electrical discharge process. AU of the scientific data indicate that the mercury is
stable and has little opportunity for uptake into the food chain.
Disuosal as Debris . The disposal procedure used for these batteries bas varied depending upon the contractor
picking them up for disposal. In the early stages of the battery recovery program, the batteries were taken to a retort

-------
11000
December L9, 1996
facility so that the small amount of mercury remaining in the battery can be recaptured for recycling. Unfortunately,
the condition of the batteries (containing water, mud, and sand) made the retort process very inefficient and the retort
facilities became increasingly reluctant to accept the batteries for treatment. In addition, the retort process causes us
concern because it poses a far greater risk to human health and the environment by potentially releasing mercury into
the air than does landfllling after treatment by macroencapsu lationfmicroencapsulation. It is also important to note
that retorting the batteries costs the taxpayer approximately five times as much as treamient by encapsulation and
landfihling.
Coast Guard inquiries to the manufacturer of the batteries revealed that the electrolyte liquid or gel makes up more
than 25 percent of the contents of the battery, and that the vent holes will inadvertently allowed the electrolyte to
escape the battery. This information, coupled with the fact that thç batteries have been sitting on the bottom of
rivers, lakes, and the ocean for at least ten years and contain sand, mud and other contaminants, led us to examine
whether the batteries were actually debris under 40 CFR §268.45 and could be disposed by landfllling after treatment
as debris. The Federal Register notice of 10 Aug 92 provides an analysis of the definition of “debris” that fits the
ATON batteries being recovered from the water. Since the batteries lose at least 25 percent of their volume we have
concluded that they are non-intact containers that qualify as debris under the rule.
Several of our hazardous waste disposal contractors have disposed of batteries as debris at the Highway 36 Landfill
in Colorado. I visited the facility and was very impressed with the operation, the inicroencapsulation process, and
their thoroughness in documenting the final placement of all treated wastes. I am convinced that disposing of the
batteries at this site provides better protection of ! mrnnn health and the environment as compared to retorting.
- Reauest for Confirmation . Several ha”ardous waste disposal contractors have recently questioned whether the
recovered ATON batteries meet the regulatory definition of debris and are demanding a much higher fee to accept
the waste batteries for disposal. In order to satisfy the contractors’ concern over this issue, I request that your office
confirm that the debris nile does apply to ATON batteries that are recovered from the environment If you determine
that our interpretation of the debris rule is mistaken, please consider this letter as a request for an exemption from the
land disposal restrictions for this unique waste stream. Should you require addition information concerning these
batteries, please call me directly at (202) 267-2369.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
End: (1) . ATON Brochure
(2) Report - “The Fate of Mercury from ATON Batteries - A Report to the Volpe Center
(3) Battery Photographs
Copy: HQ DRMS
Sincerely,
F. WANDELT
iief, Environmental Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
2

-------
U.S. Department
of Transportation
United States
Coast Guard 1
2100 Second Street. S.W.
Washington. DC 20593-0001
Staff Symbol: GSEC-3
Phone: (202) 267.1918
FAX: (202)267-4219
11000
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Waste Treatment Branch
A11N: Mr. Shaun McGarvey
Mail Code 5302-W, 401 M St. SW
Washington, DC. 20460
Dear Mr. McGarvey:
EB I I 1997
As a follow-up to my letter of December 19, 1996, I am enclosing a letter recently received from
the SAFT Company, the Coast Guard’s main battery supplier. In my previous letter, I related the
ongoing issue the Coast Guard is facing over the disposal of numerous batteries we are
recovering from the environment and their status as debris under 40 CFR 268.45.
The controversy, has focused on whether the batteries being recovered from the environment fit
the description of debris found in the Federal Register notice of August 10, 1992. The letter at
Enclosure (1) clarifies that these batteries are non-intact containers that qualify as debris because
they lose at least 25 percent of their volume when they sit in water for an extended period.
I hope that you find the enclosed letter helpful in confirming that the batteries qualify as debris
that can be properly landfilled after being treated as debris through the microencapsulation
process. I am also providing a copy of the enclosure to the h l7 irdous waste disposal contractors
who have recently questioned whether the recovered Aids to Navigation batteries meet the
regulatory definition of debris. Should you need further information or clarification concerning
this situation, please contact me directly at Coast Guard Headquarters (202) 267-2369.
Your cooperation on this extremely important matter is greatly appreciated.
/ $
/
Sincerely,
End: (1) Letter from SAFT Company dated 5 Feb 97
Copy: HQ DRMS Battle Creek, M l

-------
FEB D C ‘ 7 Ø tt3Pfl 5A T ritr t 140 Vt&_DOSTA ‘CE JS’ . P. 1
J
- .24
V
SAFT
Date; 0V05/9 ’
US Coast Guard
S.D. Walker
Acting Chief For
L.E. Jaeger
Chief. Ocean Engineering DMsion
Reference; ST Primary Batteries - Reissued Letter From 118197
Dear Sir
After reading your letter referencing disposal options for the ST & SP primary, I have the following
comments.
• The batteries do have a open vent system. it a battery were to be immersed In water, the rate
at which the electrolyte would be exchanged with the wear would be dependent on the
current flow across the vent. The rate may also be affected by salt or fresh water. The
specific gravity of the water may cause a natural gravity nting of the electrolyte with the
water It is not possible to know all of these conditIons. Therefore, an accurate prediction can
not be given as to how much and when the KOM will leave the battery. The only prediction
that can be made Is, the KOH wilhieavtthe battecy and mix with the external water.
• The emouni of electrolyte by weIght Is approximately 113 the weight of the cell The percent of
KOH found in the electrolyte is approximately 30% to 20% by volume.
• The whIte or brown colored mud found in the bottom of the cell Is the spent lime bed. This
may also mix with the water if Iiprneraed.
We do not reconvnend disposIng of these batteries In oceans, lakes or rivets. There are land fills
and SAFT Amerca Inc Is a recycle facility. We Will recycle all mercury free batteries. These are
identified by t e color of the air vents. The batteries with green vents, can be recycled at our
facility. Batteries with black air vents must be placed in en approved land fill. These older
batteries with black aIr vents contain mercury. if you have any questions please call us.
Sincerely,
Nell Jones
Manager. Product Engineering
Power Electronics, Rail end Industrisi BatterIes
SAFT America lnc

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
9551.1997(04)
MAY I 1997
I.
Mr. Thomas J. Dolce
Principal 1 ngineer
Award Environmental, Inc.
3670 West Shore Road
Warwick, Rhode Island 02886-5051
Dear Mr. Dolce:
This letter responds to your letter dated April 1, 1997, in which you had questions about
the land disposal restrictions (LDR) requirements for a ha’ rdous corrosi re wastewater. As you
described it, the, corrosive wastewater is used to neutralize other nonh rdous wastewater in a
wastewater treatment unit. The treated wastewater is discharged to the sewei. A nonha,’ardous
sludge is generated in the unit that is disposed in a sanitary landfill.
You asked what LDR notification requirements apply? Under 40 CFR 268.7(a)(6), a
h ardous waste that becomes nonh rdous because of an exclusion from ‘the definition of solid
waste is subject to a one-time notification requirement. The corrosive wastewater would be
excluded under 40 CFR 261.4(a)(1), because it is discharged to a sewer. The one-time notice
must be placed in the facility file, and should include the following information:
- a statement that the h rdous waste (D002) ‘was generated;
- a staternent’that it is excluded from the definition of solid waste under 40 CFR
261.4(a)(l); and,
- a statement providing the disposition of the waste (i.e., discharged to the sewer).
You also asked what notification requirements apply to the sludge? Because the sludge is
nonh rdous at the point of its generation (i.e., when it is removed from the wastewater
treatment unit) there are no LDR notification’ requirements for this waste (55 FR 22661-62). The
LDR requirements only apply to wastes that are h ,’ardous at the point of generation.
Finally, you asked if there is a requirement to identify and treat underlying h rdous
constituents (UHCs) in the corrosive wastewater and in the sludge generated in the wastewater
treatment tank? The answer is no, for both the’corrosive wastewater.and the sludge. For the
wastewater, in the partial withdrawal and amendinenrof the Phase ‘U final rule (61 FR 15660),
the requirement to identify and treat UHCs in decharacterized wastes was withdrawn, when those
wastes are managed in centralized wastewater treatment systems subject to the Clean Water Act.
CONCURR!PI
S
SYM8oL I 5 OJ
aaRNaJ4E)I
•...es..e......
DATE
...

...
.....
I
•es .enee.e.....e4ns.ss....ecn.sa
I

I
•afls.flss...e
.......o•.......
I
•....SeSS.aS.S.SS(S ..e...ss.....
I

•ee.se•
••se S eS0S. .
g 1
I
OFFICIAL FILE COPY
EPA F m 1320.IA (1I9O ( ‘I
PrIRUd , R.cycled Papr

-------
2
For the sludge, the fact that it is not a hazardous waste at the point of generation means no LDR
requirements, including ones requiring the identification of UHCs, attach to this waste.
Please note that the above guidance pertains to the Federal LDR rules. Actual
determinations of facility-specific requirements are normally made by EPA Regional offices or
authorized States. States may have their own more tringent requirements.
I hope you find this information helpful. If you have further questions, please call
Rhonda Minnick of my staff on (703) 308-8771.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth A Cotsworth,Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTiON AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9551.1997(05)
MAY 1 2 I t CFFICECF
SCUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Joseph M. Madden, Ph.D.
Strategic M n iger for Microbiology
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
Food and Drug Administration
200 C St., SW
Washington, D.C. 20204
Dear Mr. Madden:
This letter is in response to your request for guidance on the suitability of disposing of
frozen strawberries that may be contaminated with hepatitis A virus (HAV) in a municipal solid
waste landfill. As you explained, recently, certain batches of frozen strawberries sold in the
United States by a specific company have been potentially contAminated with HAV.
Discussions were held between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
about the disposal of these frozen strawberries. We considered rn ny factors in these
discussions. The quantity and viability of the virus in the current situation were considered. The
strawberries are not expected to be extensively contaminated since the epiderniological data
suggest that contamination is relatively focal (possibly just one lot or part of lot) and the virus will
not replicate unless it is in a human host. Rats, insects and other species often found in the landfill
environment are not vebicles of tran m1ission for the virus. in addition, the viability oldie virus
degrades with time. For this virus, the primary infection pathway is through the oral-fecal route
(ingestion). No documented outbreaks of landfill or sewage workers contracting hepatitis A in the
workplace have been reported in the literature and waterborne outbreaks are rare.
Further discussion centered on risk of infection based on landfill conditions. Although it is
unlikely that the temperatures achieved in a landfill are sufficient to inactivate HAV, we agreed
that the virus being released to the environment through groundwater contamination is unlikely in a
properly designed and maintained municipal solid waste landfill. As the primary infection
pathway is through ingestion, potential aerosoli7ation and subsequent inhalation are not of concern.
Additionally, the strawberries in this situation will be rendered inedible under FDA requirements.

-------
After careful consideration of the facts involved in the current situation, the Agencies
believe that disposal of these strawberries in a properly operated and maintained municipal solid
waste landfill is appropriate and does not pose a risk of infection to disposal workers or the
general public. This detemiination does not rule out consideration of other options for disposal,
such as incineration in a municij,al solid waste combustor.
Although the federal EPA does not have regulatory requirements regarding the disposal
of this specific waste stream, most states are authorized to implement their own Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) programs. Therefore, mm y state and local regulatory
agencies have their own regulations which may differ from federal regulations. These agencies
should be contacted for specific information on state and local requirements.
Thank you for your concern about safe waste n12i gement. Please do not hesitate to
contact Krishna Meson of my staff with any questions or concerns. Krishna may be reached at
(703) 308-8488.
Sincerely,
li bethA. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste

-------
, to
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASIIINGTON. 0 C 20460
9554.1997(01)
;t ’ 8 ‘Q 7
FICE
SOUD WASTE AND EMERL ENCY
ESP’)NSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Use of Site-Specific Land Disposal Restriction Treatability Variances Under 40
CFR 268.44 (h) During Cleanups
FROM: Michael Shapiro, Directo’
Office of Solid Waste
Steve Luftig, Director
Office of Emergency and Remedial Resp&ise
TO: RCRA/CERCLA Senior Policy M n gers
Regions I - X
This memorandum encourages appropriate use of site-specific land disposal restriction
(LDR) treatability variances under 40 CFR § 268.44(h) for contaminated soils and other
materials m2naged during cleanups. In particular, this mel!iorandum clarifies the minimum
requirements for alternative treatment standards and outlines treatability variance procedures. It
builds on Superfund LDR Guides 6A and 6B, “Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance
for Remedial Actions and Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability. Variance for Removal
Action,” publication numbers 9347.3-067S and 9347.3-0B67S, September 1990 and the quick
reference fact sheet “Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatability Variances for
Contaminated Soils and Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions,” publication number 93 80.3-
O8FS, January 1992.
LDR Applicability
The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA), enacted November 8, 1984,
largely prohibit land disposal of h ,atdous wastes. After a waste is prohibited from land disposal
the statute provides two options: comply with a specified treatment standard designed to
minimize threats to human health and the environment prior to land disposal or dispose of the
Pru tøil with veoalable 0.! Based InI on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Pos*consurner)

-------
waste in a “no migration” unit) Land disposal includes any placement of hazardous waste into a
landfill, surface impoundment, waste pile, injection well, land treatment facility, salt dome
formation, salt bed formation, or underground mine or cave. See, RCRA Section 3004(k).
Since 1984, EPA has developed LDR treatment standards for all hazardous wastes listed
or identified at the time HSWA was enacted and many hazardous wastes that have been
subsequently listed or identified (e.g., the new toxicity characteristic (TC) wastes). The Agency
recognizes, however, that in some cases these generally applicable LDR treatment standards will
be unachieveable or inappropriate. When a generally applicable LDR treatment standard is
unachieveable or inappropriate, a site-specific LDR treatability variance offers an opportunity to
comply with LDRs through development of an alternative standard based on site- and waste-
specific characteristics. The Agency’s longstanding policy is that site-specific treatability
variances are generally appropriate for contaminated soils; they also may be appropriate for other
wastes encountered during site cleanups. See, e.g., 55 FR 8666, 8760-8761 (March 8, 1990); 58
FR 48092,48125 (September 14, 1993); 61 FR 18805-18808, 18810-18812 (April 29, 1996); 61
FR 55717 (October 28, 1996).
it is important to note that the land disposal restrictions apply only to h ardous wastes
placed after the effective date of the applicable land disposal prohibition. Not all materials
managed during a cleanup action are h rdous wastes and not all activities conducted during a
cleanup action constitute placement. For example, EPA has interpreted placement to include
putting hazardous waste into a land-disposal unit, moving hazardous wastes from one land-
disposal unit to another, and removing hazardous waste from the land, managing it in a separate
unit, and re-placing it in the same or a different land-disposal unit. Placement does not occur
when hazardous waste is consolidated within a land-disposal unit, when it is treated in situ, or
when left in place (e.g., capped). See, e.g., 55 FR 8758-8760, (March 8, 1990).
When To Use Site-Specific Variances
Site-specific LDR treatability variances generally do not require rulemaking for approval;
they are approved on a case-by-case basis in consideration of site- and waste-specific
circumstances and conditions. A site-specific variance may be approved when the properties of
the waste at issue are physically or chemically different from the properties of the wastes
evaluated in establiching the generally applicable treatment standard and, as a result, the
generally applicable standard cannot be achieved. A site-specific variance may also be approved
when the generally applicable treatment standard is based on a Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BDAT) that is inappropriate for the waste in question. See, 268.44(h) and 61 FR
55717 (October 28, 1996).
‘A no migration unit is a unit from which there will be no migration of hazardous constituents for as long as the
waste placed in the unit remains hazardous. See, RCR.A Sections 3004(d), (e), (g)(5).
2

-------
Common cleanup situations which may prompt consideration of a site-specific
treatability variance include:
Cleanup of contaminated soils where the generally applicable land disposal
treatment standards are based on combustion. For large quantities of
contaminated soils with relatively low concentrations of hazardous constituents,
EPA generally considers treatment standards based on combustion inappropriate.
• Cleanups where bench or pilot scale studies indicate that the generally applicable
land disposal treatment standard cannot be achieved
• Cleanup of old sludges initially placed prior to the effective date of land disposal
prohibitions. In some cases the physical or chemical composition of sludges
become significantly altered upon prolonged exposure to: natural sunlight, acidic
rainfall, weather cycles (such as freeze-thaw) and intrusion, commingling, or
chemical reaction with rainfall, soil, windblown dirt and/or other co-disposed
wastes. These types of exposure can result in changes in composition through:
evaporation or migration of volatiles, sunlight induced polymerization of
orga.nics, lime stabilization (i.e., self-cementation), photodegradation, natural
biodegradation, hydrolysis, and even electrolytic oxidation/reduction reactions.
As a result, weathered sludges often no longer have the physical or chemical
composition of newly generated sludges and a treatability variance may be
warranted.
• Cleanups where, due to site-spec /1c circumstances, compliance with the generally
applicable land disposal treatment standard would result in a net environmental
detriment, for example, by discouraging cleanup. In some situations, legal and
protective cleanup alternatives involve the choice between remedies that require
compliance with LDR treatment standards developed for as-g nerated wastes and
remedies that do not (i.e., remedies that rely on containment). When application
of the generally applicable treatment standard provides an incentive for remedies
that , while permitted under applicable law, are less aggressive (and, potentially,
less protective over the long term) than alternatives, the generally applicable
standard may be considered inappropriate. Note, many of these remedies will
inclUde some form of treatment; however, it might not be the treatment prescribed
for as-generated wastes. See, e.g., 61 FR 55717 (October 28, 1996) where EPA
approved alternative treatment standards, in part, because imposing the otherwise
applicable standards would have resulted in a net environmental detriment.
3

-------
Alternative Treatment Standards
All alternative LDR treatment standards must satisfy the statutory requirement of RCRA
3 004(m) by minimizing threats to human health and the environment. In many situations.
protective, risk-based, site-specific cleanup standards established in the context of an Agency-
overseen cleanup will meet this “minimize threat” standard and may be used as alternative
treatment standards. In other situations, alternative treatment standards may be established on a
technology basis. 2
Risk-based alternative treatment standards established in the context of an Agency-
overseen cleanup should consider EPA guidance on risk-based cleanup standards. EPA has
interpreted protective cleanup standards to include risk-based media cleanup standards that are
within the 10’ to 10 risk range for carcinogens and result in a hazard index of one or less for
constituents with non-carcinogenic effects. Protective, risk-based, site-specific cleanup standards
can be based on generally available constituent concentration standards (e.g., MCLs and many
state cleanup standards) or they may be developed for an individual site (e.g., through a site-
specific risk assessment). Alternative treatment standards established on a technology basis are
most often based on site-specific treatabiity data oron a “substantial treatment” standard. For
example, 90 per cent reduction in constituent concentrations is generally considered substantial
treatment.
For contaminated soils, the Superfund LDR Guides 6A and 6B, “Obtaining a Soil and
Debris Treatability Variance for Remedial Actions and Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability
Variance for Removal Action,” publication numbers 9347.3-067S and 9347.3-0B67S,
September 1990 provide suggested constituent concentration ranges and per cent reduction
targets that may be used as guidance when establishing alternative LDR treatment standards for
contaminAted soils. 3 When using the constituent concentration ranges or per cent reduction
targets from the 6AJ6B guidance, the Agency should be prepared to support application of these
standards on a site-specific basis. As with application of any Agency guidance, application of
the constituent concentration ranges or per cent reduction targets from the 6A/6B guidance could
be questioned by facility owners/operators or by the public; the Agency must be prepared to
respond to these comments and justify application of any guidance to site- and waste-specific
2 The ability to, as appropriate, use site-specific, risk-based cleanup levels as alternative LDR n eannent
standards does not affect the Agency’s other remedial expectations, for example, that ueannent will be used to address the
principal threats posed by a site whenever practicable.
Note that protective, risk-based cleanup standards that are developed based on site-specific conditions may be
either higher or lower than the constituent concentration ranges or per-cent reduction targets from the 6A/6B guidance. In
addition, while debris are still eligible for site-specific treaxability variance, such variances are no longer presumed to be
appropriate. LDR treannent standards specific to debris were promulgated August 18, 1992 (57 FR 37194).
4

-------
circumstances.
Constituents Subject to Treatment
Unless the generally applicable LDR treatment standard will be met, alternative
treatment-standards must be-set for each-constituent subject to-treatment. Constituents subject to
treatment are, for listed wastes, the constituents for which treatment standards are specified in 40
CFR 268.40 and, for characteristic wastes, the characteristic constituent and any underlying
hazardous constituents present at concentrations greater than the Universal Treatment Standards
(UTS) specified in 40 CFR 268.48. For example, a waste that fails the toxicity characteristic
leaching test for benzene but also containc other organic ha’ardous constituents such as toluene,
ethyl benzene, and xylene must meet treatment standards for both the benzene and the other
h a,ardous constituents. 4 Note that, when testing characteristic waste to determine constituents
subject to treatment, individuals do not necessarily have to test for every constituent with a
universal treatment standard; they may limit testing to constituents that are reasonably expected
to be present.
Multiple Contaminants
It is not automatically necessary to treat all coi stituents subject to treatment in order to
satisfy RCRA Section 3004(m). Just as some industrial wastes are generated with concentrations
of constituents subject to treatment that are below the applicable land disposal treatment
standards, some wastes generated during cleanup may contain concentrations of h rdous
constituents that are below land disposal treatment standards established in a site-specific
treatability variance. It is common for cleanup wastes to contain mixtures of many different
kinds of h rdous constituents at widely varying concentrations. Often, these combinations of
constituents or constituent concentrations are different from the constituents combinations and
concentrations typically found in as-generated wastes that carry the same waste code or exhibit
the same h wdous characteristic and treatment of all constituents subject to treatment may not
be required to satisfy RCRA Section 3004(m).
In some of these cases, a treatability variance might establish alternative treatment
standards foi some constituents subject to treatment, but not others (i.e., compliance with the
otherwise applicable treatment standard might be required for some constituents). In other cases,
a treatability variance might require treatment to meet alternative LDR treatment standards for
some constituents subject to treatment while for others it might be determined that no treatment
is necessary to comply with LDRs. For example, a waste might be characteristic for benzene and
4 Note, extending the obligation to n’eat for underlying hazardous constituents to IC metal waste was discussed
in 60 FR 43654, August 22, 1995. The proposal has not been finalized.
5

-------
contain low levels of toluene, ethyl benzene, or xylene. Depending on the concentrations of the
individual constituents, treatment might be required for the benzene, and protective, risk-based
alternative treatment standards for the minor contaminants might be established such that
treatment to comply with LDR standards was not required (i.e., where the initial constituent
concentrations are at or below the risk-based standard). Similarly, a cleanup waste might fail the
toxicity characteristic leaching test for a metal contaminant and also contain low levels of
organic contaminants. Treatment to the generally applicable LDR treatment standards might be
required for the TC metal, but protective, risk-based alternative LDR treatment standards for the
organics might be established at or above the initial constituent concentrations, making treatment
of the organics unnecessary. 3
Variance Procedures
In states authorized to issue site-specific LDR treatability variances, applications should
be submitted to the state h rdous waste program director, or other official designated by the
state. In states that are not authorized to issue these variances, applications should be submitted
to the EPA Regional Administrator or to the appropriate delegated official within the Region. All
applications should include information required by 40 CFR 260.20(b)(1) - (4) and information
documenting compliance with the waste analysis requirements of 40 CFR 268.7.
Applications for site-specific LDR treatability variances will likely require less detail and
rigorous analysis th2n applications for generically applicable variance (e.g., rulemaking variances
under 268.44(a)); however, if necessary EPA can use 40 CFR 268.44 (j) to request additional
information to support a given application. All approvals should emphasize that the variances
are site- and waste-specific in nature and do not apply to any other site or waste. -
Whenever possible, the decision to approve a site-specific LDR treatability variance
should be integrated into other cleanup decision documents (e.g., RCRA Statement of Basis,
CERCLA Record of Decision, state corrective action order). As a matter of Agency policy, site-
specific LDR treatability variances should undergo public notice and opportunity for comment
before approval. See, 53 FR at 31200 (August 17, 1988). Similar to the decision to approve a
variance, whenever possible, public notice and opportunity for comment for site-specific LDR
treatability variances should be combined with other public notice and opportunity for comment
activities that occur during Agency-overseen cleanups (e.g., the public notice and opportunity for
comment associated with a CERCLA proposed plan or approval of a corrective action remedy).
In the limited circumstances where it is not possible to combine public notice for site-specific
LDR treatability vaiiances with other public notice opportunities, public notice and opportunity
for comment should be provided consistent with the program goals of full, fair and equitable
See footnote 4.
6

-------
public participation. While a variance application is pending the applicant must comply with all
applicable land disposal restrictions and requirements (40 CFR 268.44(1)).
As discussed in the National Contingency Plan (55 FR 8760-8762) and the Superfund
LDR 6A and 6B guides, EPA presumes that site-specific LDR treatability variances may be
for a site-specific LDR treatability
variance for soil do not have to document that the generally applicable LDR treatment standards
are unachievable or inappropriate.’ However, applicants should include information
documenting the basis for their application supporting application of the soil presumption to their
site- and waste-specific circumstances. Applications for site-specific LDR treatability variances
that address cleanup wastes other than soil should include information documenting that either
(I) the waste ‘at issue is significantly different from the waste evaluated for the generally
applicable treatment standard and, as a result, the regulated constituents cannot be treated to the
specified levels or (2) the generally applicable standard is based is not appropriate. Applications
should include a statement, signed by the applicant, certifying that the information in the
application is true and correct.
Delegation
The authority to approve site-specific LDR treatability variances for contaminated soils
was delegated to Regional Administrators in Delegation 8-45-B. For CERCLA removal actions
and actions under the solid waste disposal act (which includes RCRA), the authority can be
further delegated to regional Division Directors. The authority to approve site-specific LDR
treatability variances for one-time only cleanup wastes (non-soil or debris wastes, i.e., sludges
managed as part of a cleanup) is under consideration for delegation to Regional Administrators.
(See proposed delegation 8-45-C.)
While the authority to approve site-specific LDR treatability variances will rest with the
Regions and states, we encourage you to work together and with EPA Headquarters to maintain a
national dialogue on variance issues. In particular, we request that Regions. (and authorized
states) share information on critical or precedent setting variances so we can all benefit from your
experiences and so we can assure that issues of national scope or consistency are equitably
resolved. This information could be shared at national and regional meetings or through other
networking opportunities.
6 o course, if a commenter on.any given sUe-specific treatability variance challenges the presumption, the
Agency must address these comments on a site-specific basis, for example, by articuLating the site-specific conditions that
support the presumption, in response.
7

-------
State Authorization
EPA has recently clarified its policy on state authorization for site-specific LDR
treatability variances and is actively encouraging states to seek authorization for and integrate
appropriate use of these variances in their cleanup programs. See, 61 FRI 8828 (April 29. 1996).
Additional information on state-authorization will be provided in an upcoming update to the
State Program Advisory.
Disclaimer
This document provides guidance to EPA and State personnel on how to best implement
RCRA and EPA’s regulations on site-specific treatability variances to facilitate appropriate use
of these variances, especially as part of Agency-overseen cleanups. It also provides guidance to
the public and the regulated community on how EPA intends to exercise its discretion in
impldmenting these regulations. This document does not, however, substitute for EPA’s
regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally binding requirements on
EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based on
specific circumstances. EPA may change this guidance in the future, as appropriate.
Summary/Additional Information
Site-specific LDR treatabiity variances are an important tool to ensure compliance with
appropriate LDR treatment standards. They can be especially useful where application of the
generally applicable standard can serve as a disincentive towards aggressive cleanup. We
encourage you to continue to integrate site-specific LDR treatability variances into your cleanup
activities and to support the use of these variances into state programs. For additional
information, please contact Elizabeth McManus or Shaun McC}arvey at (703) 308-8657 and
(703) 308-8603, respectively.
cc: Jim Berlow, OSW
Susan Bromm, OSRE
Eli beth Cotsworth, OSW
Matthew Hale, OSW
Peter Neves, OSRE
David Nielsen, OER
Bruce Means, OERR
Dawn Messier, OGC
Larry Reed, OERR
Steve Silverman, OGC
Larry Starfield, OOC
8

-------
Jim Thompson, ORE
Jim Woolford, FFRRO
Regional RCRA Branch Chiefs
Regional CERCLA Branch Chiefs
Torn Kennedy, Association of States and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials
9

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTiON AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9554.1997(02)
FEB 1 I 1997 OFFICE OF
SCUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Hugh Al]erton
Director, Environmental Affairs
TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc.
4505 West 26 Mile Road
Washington, MI 48094
Dear Mr. Allerton:
In your letter of December 17, 1996, you requested that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) make a determination
whether or not solidification of the evaporator concentrate waste
produced at TRW’S Mesa II Facility, Mesa, Arizona, achieves the
land disposal restriction treatment technology standard of
deactivation.
Based on the information provided and conversations between
your staff and mine, it is EPA’s understanding the waste stream
may be comprised of up to 15 percent sodium azide, and has been
classified as a K044 hazardous waste by the State of Arizona.
For a K044 waste, deactivation (DEACT) is the required treatment
prior to land disposal (40 CFR 268.40). To accomplish the
deactivation of wastewaters the recommended deactivation
technologies are incineration, chemical/electrolytic oxidation,
chemical reduction, biodegradation, or carbon adsorption (40 CFR
26 , Appendix VI). The list of recommended technologies is
advisory only and does riot constitute a list of the only
deactivation technologies that can be used. Any technology that
removes the characteristic of reactivity may be used. In the
preamble to the Third Third Rule 55 FR at 22552 (June 1, 1990),
EPA noted that it had selected “deactivation”, because
technologies exist that can remove this characteristic, and that
the general standard would allow the regulated community to use
whichever treatment technology that best fits the type of
explosive waste; see also Chemical Waste Management v. EPA, 976
F.2d 2, 18 (D.C. Cir. 1992) cert. denied 113 S. Ct. 1961 (1993)
where the court upheld the deactivation standard for wastes
identified because they exhibit the characteristic of reactivity.
Therefore, based on the data provided, EPA concludes that
solidification of the K044 wastestream with pozzolonic material

-------
2
satisfies current regulations, as long as the solidified material
no longer exhibits the potential to form reactive residues and
provided the waste does not exhibit any other RCRA hazardous
waste characteristic.
If you need further assistance, please contact John Austin,
Waste Treatment Branch (703-308-0436).
Sincerely yours,
Shapiro, Director
of Solid Waste

-------
. IO S7
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
pRo t
9554.1997(03)
MAR I I 1997
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
David J. Lennett, Attorney - RESPONSE
Louisiana Environmental Action Network
P0. Box 71
Dennis Hill Road
Litchfleld, Maine 04350
Dear
EPA has received your February 14, 1997, request to Adrnir ictrator Carol Browner for
an administrative stay of the treatabiity variance granted for the h 2rdous waste generated
from the closure of the Surge Pond at C1TGO Petroleum’s Lake Charles, Louisiana refinery.
61 FR 55718 (Oct. 28, 1996). You indicate that “ [ t]he CITGO variance is bad law and worse
environmental policy”, state that EPA is giving in to “environmental blackmail”, and maintain
that a stay is needed to avoid irreparable harm”.
EPA does not believe an administrative stay is justified. EPA continues to believe that
the variance is warranted to avoid the possibility of a net environmental detriment at the
facility: no closure by waste removal and no wealnient at all of hav%rdous waste. A stay
would similarly put off the optimal closure of the surface impoundment, creating a net
environmental loss. In this regard, it is EPA’s understanding (based on conversations with
CrTGO’s counsel) that CITGO in fact is working expeditiously to develop an improved
treatment system to meet the treatment standards set out in the variance, and will submit a
closure plan and resume the remediation when this task is completed. The suggestion in your
petition that the company is not pursuing its ultimate remediation effort thus appears to be
incorrect at this time.
In addition, EPA finds again chat the extent of treatment of excavated waste required
under the variance is substantial, requiring removal and desmiction of benzene (the most
h zaTdous constituent in the sludge) to the same level as required by the existing treatment
standard, and requiring substantial treatment (greater than 90 % removal and destruction, or
immobilization) of most of the remaining h ,2Tdous constituents in the waste. The treaunent
process and subsequent disposal is fully regulated under federal and state standards. This
course of management will be fully protective of human health and the environment. There is
no suggestion otherwise in your petition, and none in the administrative record. We do not
agree that an action which results in optimal site remediation, includes substantial treatment of
the excavated waste, is fully protective of human health and the environment, and delay of
which would be environmentally detrimental should be stayed, or can in any way be said to be
causing irreparable injury.
R.cycl.dlR.cycIabS. • Pdnted 1th Vegelable CU Based tn on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Po wnsume )

-------
EPA also disagrees with your reading that the treatability variance language in 40 CFR
268. 44 (a) requires a finding that the waste’s chemical or physical properties differ
significantly from the waste tested to develop the treattnent standard in order for a treatment
standard to be uappropriate . See generally 61 FR at 55720-21. EPA’s view is that the
finappropthteu clause is a separate test, not dependent on whether the waste is physically
capable of being treated to the LDR level. hi.. I also note that EPA’s longstanding and
consistent interpretation was most recently reiterated in national guidance issued by EPA’s
Director of the Office of Solid Waste and Director of Emergency and Remedial Response on
January 8, 1997 (copy attached). I do not believe that a court will overturn EPA’s reasonable
re ding of its own regulation and thus I do not agree that there is a substantial likelihood that
the litigation will succeed on the merits.
In the course of interpreting the trearability variance language, you refer to the
settlement agreement between EPA and the ETC in the treatability variance case involving the
variances for the Craftsman and Northwestern electroplaters (no. 91-1296) (D.C. Cir.). That
settlement agreement establishes no precedent for the decision in the Citgo variance. The
Craftsman and Northwestern variances, and the settlement agreement and subsequent
correspondence, dealt nI y with a situation where the issue was whether a waste was
physically different from the one used to develop a treatment standard, not with whether a
treatment standard was inappropriate. That settlement agreement should not be cited in
support of your arguments here regarding a different type of treatability variance.
In conclusion, I do not believe that you have presented grounds warranting the Agency
staying the treatability variance. Therefore, we must deny your petition. It is unfortunate that
you disagree with our policy in this matter. We have identified an approach that will provide
a timely, protective solution to the problem of remedi2ting the Citgo site. This approach has
the backing of State and EPA Regional officials, and involves completion of work already
commenced. We had hoped that you would recognize arid endorse the environmental benefits
of taking action to complete work at this location. In any event, we are not prepared to accept
continuation of the status quo during an uncertain period of litigation, because the status quo
involves leaving the remediation unaddressed.
Office
Waste
2

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I”— I
M4R 2O 97
9554.1997(04)
Christophe Lawrence
209 Wharton Street
Blacksburg, VA 24060)
Dear Christophe;
You have raised the question of the applicability of RCRA’s Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDR) program to land treatment or land farming of h ,’ardous waste. By land farming, I am
referring to the purposeful application of “as-generated’ t waste water or sludge to soils in order to
promote the degradation and treatment of waste constituents. I am not referring to
bioremediation or other in-situ techniques used for the clean-up of soils at Superfund or other
contaminated sites.
Application or placement of waste into a land treatment facility is defined as land disposal,
according to 40 CFR §268.2(c). Therefore, any RCRA 1 -ardous waste that is subject to the
LDR program must either meet the applicable LDR treatment standards or qualify for a variance
from those treatment standards before it can be applied in a land treatment unit, even if the
purpose of that land application is treatment As 40 CFR §268.40(a) indicates, the table
“Treatment Standards for Hazardous Wastes” in §26 8.40 lists the RCRA waste codes that are
subject to LDR and the treatment standards established for each of those codes. As of Februaiy
1997, almost all RCRA waste codes are subject to LDR regulations.
The primary exemption from LDR treatment requirements available to land treatment units
is the no-migration variance. Such a variance is granted only after a petition making the detailed
demonstration outlined in 40 CFR §268.6 is approved by EPA Headquarters. All tentative and
final EPA decisions on these no-migration variances are published in the Federal Register, as
required by §268.6(j). Currently, only one no-migration variance from the LDR treatment
standards has been granted to a ha rdous waste land treatment facility. That facility is the
Exxon refinery at Billingc , MT, and the notice approving its variance was published in the July
27; 1993, Fedeial Register (58 FR 40134). The number of RCRA land treatment units qualifying
for this variance from LDR will probably not increase sigiiificantly in the near future, as no new
no-migration petitions for land treatment facilities have been received at EPA Headquarters
during the past six years.
It should be noted that permits that predate all or part of the LDR regulations, and tbat allow
the app’licalion of hazardous wastes to land treatment units, do not shield the permittee ot facility
fl3117fl7 t /t 4’ ”I I I I I . 1
EPA Fcnn 13 .1A (1190) pp OFFICIAL FILE COPY

-------
from any of the LDR rules, as stated in §270.4(a)(2) and the June 1, l990 Federal Register (55
FR 22525). Furthermore, unlike certain other parts of the RCRA program, LDR regulations are
applicable and effective at the same time in all states regardless of state regulatory adoption and
authorization issues (4O-CFR 27l .3(b)).
I hope this adequately addresses your concerns. If you have any further questions, please
contact David Ebèrly of my staff on 703-308-8645.
Sincerely,
Sonya Sasseville, Acting Chief
Permits Branch
cc: )avid Eberly
Chris Rhyne

-------
9554.1997(05)
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
April 1997
2. Treatment Standards for D008
Radioactive Lead Tanks and
Containers
The land disposal restrictions (LDR) of 40
CFR Part 268 require that certain wastes
meet treatment standards before land
disposaL Treatment standards are either
concentration-based or technology-based. A
waste with a concentration-based standard
may be treated to meet LDR using any method
of effective treatment (except impermissible
dilution), while a technology-based standard
requires treatment by the spec jf led
technology. D008 radioactive lead solids
(e.g.. all forms of lead shielding. lead “pigs”
and other eleinenialfornis of lead) must be
treated by the specific rrearmeiit standard of
• inacroencapsulation (MA CR0) (55 FR 22628:
June 1. 1990). The MACRO treannent method
requires application of suiface coatings or
jackezing of wastes to reduce su,face exposure
to leaching media. Macroencapsularion
spec /ically may not be used on “any material
that would be cIass fied as a tank or
container” ( 268.42, Table 1). What is the
LDR treatment standard for D008 radioactive
lead solids that happen to be ranks or
containers?
D008 radioactive lead solids that are tanks
or containers must be treated using the
MACRO treatment technology. The
macroencapsulation treatment standard
requires that the encapsulating material
completely surround the waste and be
unbroken (57 EE 37235; August 18, 1992).
Placement of waste in a container or tank.
however, is not considered rnacroencapsulation
for purposes of compliance with LDR
( 268.42. Table 1). This provision is not
intended to preclude macroencapsulation of
hazardous tanks and containers, but rather to
prevent an owner/operator from merely placing
waste in a tank or container in order to meet
the standard. Although D008 radioactive lead
solids must meet the macroencapsulation
treatment standard, an owner/operator may use
an alternative treatment method for compliance
with LDR if it is shown that the method is
equivalent in performance to the specified
method ( 268.42(b)>

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
,CO S7
PROIt ’
9592.1997(01)
MEMORANDUM
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
management standards to vegetable oil and animal oil
This is iñ sponse to your December 5, 1996 memorandum concerning the regulatory status
of vegetable oil and animal oil under the used oil regulations at 40 CFR 279. Your memorandum
requests clarification on whether the definition of used oil includes animal and vegetable oils.
The used oil management rules define “used oil” in 40 CFR § 279.]. as “any oil that has been
refined from crude oil, or any synthetic oil that has been used and as a result of such use is
contaminated by chemical or physical impurities.” Since animal and vegetable oils are not
synthetic or derived from crude oil, they are not regulated as used oil under the used oil
management standards. A more detailed discussion of the definition of used oil may be found in
the preamble discussion to the used oil management standards in the September 10, 1992 Federal
Register (57 FR 41566, 41573 -41574).
I hope this information is helpfl l to you. For tbrther information regarding the used oil
regulations, please call Rita Cestaric at (703) 308-0769.
( ) Recycled/Recyclable
<9 PfIrned wtth SoylC*nola ia on paper mal
ntaJna at ius 50% ravycsed ODe?
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
FEB 71997
Rich Vaille, Chief
State Programs & Compliance Branch

-------
DEC 0_s. 1996.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 9
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
Clarification of vegpjablp oil and animal oil in the definition of used oil.
Rich Value, ChiefX’
Sta 9?ograms & Compliance Branch
Mich e1 Shapiro, Director
of Solid Waste
We have had a request for the interpretation of vegetable oil and animal oil under the
used oil regulations.
The California Department of Toxic Substances Control is going to regulate this oil as
synthetic oil under their used oil regulations. In order to clarify the intent of regulation of
synthetic oils under RCRA we are requesting a letter from your office.
A member of my staff spoke to Rita Cestaric, of your staff , and she indicated that this
letter would be more official than the RCRA hotiine question and answer report which is
currently under OGC review.
We need the clarification for the requestor and the other states in our region.
Thanks for your consideration.
‘t,

-------
9592.1997(02)
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
April 1997
1. The Definition of Used Oil
The standards for the management of
recycled used oil in 40 CFR Part 279 define
used oil as “any oil that has been refined from
crude oil, or any synthetic oil, that has been
used and as a result of such use is
contaminated by physical, or chemical
impurities.” Does this definition include
materials den ved from crude oil, such as
petroleum-based solvents or antifreeze?
Petroleum-based solvents and antifreeze
are not included in the definition of used oil
under Part 279. The definition of used oil is
based on three criteria: origin, use, and
contamination. A material must meet all three
parts to be defined as used oil under Part 279.
First, the used oil must be derived from
crude oil or synthetic oil (i.e., derived from
coal, shale, or polymers). Examples of crude-
oil derived oils and synthetic oils are motor
oil, mineral oil, laminating surface agents and
metalworking oils. The origin-based
definition would not include animal and
vegetable oils. Second, the oil must have been
used as a lubricant, coolant, heat (non-contact)
transfer fluid, hydraulic fluid, or for a similar
use. Lubricants include, but are not limited to,
used motor oil, metalworking lubricants, and
emulsions. An example of a hydraulic fluid is
transmission fluid. Heat transfer fluids can be
materials such as coolants, heating media,
refrigeration oils, and electrical insulation oils.
Authorized states or regions determine what is
considered a “similar use” on a site-specific
basis according to whether the material is used
and managed in a manner consistent with Part
279 (e.g.. used as a buoyant). Third, the used
oil must be contaminated by physical (e.g..
high water content) or chemical (e.g.. lead,
halogens, or other hazardous constituents)
impurities as a result of use.
Petroleum-based solvents are not
considered to be used oil because solvent use
does not meet the use-based criterion.
Petroleum-based solvent used for its solvent
properties, that is to solubilize (dissolve) or
mobilize other constituents, is not use as a
lubricant, heat transfer fluid, hydraulic fluid,
or similar use (see 57 41566, 41575).
Antifreeze also is not regulated as used oil
under Part 279. Although it is possible for
antifreeze to meet all three criteria for used
oil, EPA does not intend to regulate antifreeze
as used oil, and encourages it to be recycled
separately.

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
9592.1997(03)
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
July 1997
1. Self-Transportation of Used Oil by
Service Contractors
Used oil generators must ensure that all
shipments of used oil in quantities greater
than 55 gallons are transported off site only
by transporters with EPA identification
numbers. Generators may transport up to 55
gallons of used oil in their own vehicles (self-
transport) without an EPA ident4ficazion
number, provided the used oil is either
produced at the generator’s site or collected
from do-it-yourselfers, and provided the used
oil is sent to an approved collection center or
an aggregation point owned or operated by
the generator (40 CFR §279.24). Ifa facility
hires a contractor to come on site and service
equipment containing used oiL provided the
contractor complies with the requirements of
§279.24, can the contractor self-transport the
used oil generated from servicing the
equipment without an EPA identification
number?
The contractor can self-transport up to 55
gallons of used oil to a collection center or an
aggregation point without an EPA
identification number because he also
qualifies as the generator of that used oil. The
definition of used oil generator includes “any
person, by site, whose act or process produces
used oil or whose act first causes used oil to
become subject to regulation” ( 279.l). A
contractor, therefore, that comes on site and
services equipment containing used oil is a
used oil generator, because the contractor’s act
of servicing and removing used oil from
equipment first causes the used oil to be
subject to regulation. As a generator, such a
contractor may self-transport up to 55-gallons
of used oil without an EPA identification
number pursuant to §274.24.
This situation is analogous to the one
described in the September 10, 1992,
preamble discussion of used oil generated on
ships in which the owner or operator of the
ship or vessel and the person or persons•
removing or accepting the oil from the vessel
are considered to be “co-generators” of the
used oil (57 4l566; 41585). Similarly,
both the owner or operator of the equipment
and the person removing used oil from the
equipment may be considered “co-generators”
of the used oil, and both parties are
responsible for managing the used oil in
accordance with used oil generator standards
of Part 279, Subpart C. The co-generators
may decide which of the parties will fulfill the
generator requirements. Either co-generator
can self-transport the used oil under the
provisions of § 279.24 without an EPA
identification number, provided no more than
55 gallons of used oil are transported at any
one time, provided the used oil is transported
in vehicles owned by the co-generator or
owned by an employee of the co-generator,
and provided the used oil is sent to an
approved collection center or to an
aggregation point owned or operated by the
co-generator who is self-transporting the used
oil.
I

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
February 1997
9593.1997(01)
3. Universal Waste Consolidation Point
Regulation
The universal waste management
standards of 40 CFR Pan 273 oudine the
streamlined provisions fc.r handlers,
ransporters, and destination facilities that
manage universal wastes. Section 273.6
defines a universal waste as hazardous
batteries, pesticides, and thermostats. A
handler, defined as a generator of universal
waste (Le., any person, by site, whose act or
process produces hazardous waste or whose
act first causes waste to become subject to
regulation) is allowed to accumulate waste on
site for up to one year. If a facility is not a
generator of universal waste, yet is receiving
universal waste and functioning as a
consolidation and/or collection point, would
the facility be regulated under the universal
waste regulations?
Yes, the facility would be regulated under
the universal waste regulations if it is
consolidating and/or collecting universal waste
from generators or other handlers. The
definition of a universal waste handler includes
facilities that receive universal waste from
other handlers ( 273.6). A facility is allowed
to consolidate and/or collect universal waste,
provided the waste is sent on to other handlers,
recyclers, or treatment/disposal facilities (60
EE 1 25500; May 11, 1995). Moreover, if the
facility has several locations at which universal
wastes are consolidated and/or collected, each
location would be regulated as a separate
handler. Additional RCRA requirements may
apply if the facility is handling other types of
h ardous waste (i.e., non-universal waste).

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
O sr 4 ? -
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
_____ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
\
9593.1997(02)
FEB iS 1997 OFFICECF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: nivbrsal Waste Questions and Answers Document
FROM:
Offi Solid Waste
TO: Senior RCRA Policy Managers
Regions I-X
Since the promulgation of the May 11, 1995 Universal Waste rule (60 FR 25492), several
States have begun to adopt the Federal program. As a result, •m questions have been raised
with respect to State implementation and enforcement for ha’ ardous wastes co vered under the
Universal Waste Federal program. Further, States have asked the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Regional Offices for guidance on.adding other types of h i ardous waste to their
State universal waste programs. To assist those States during their implementation process and
to provide you with the Agency’s iiosition on these issues, the Office of Solid Waste has prepared
a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document. The Q&A document also addresses other issues
related to universal waste management (e.g., universal waste generation and transportation
issues). I have attached the•documeñt for your information and encourage you to share it with the
appropriate State Officials.
If you have any questions regarding State authorization, please contact Wayne Roepe at
(703) 308-8630. If you have other questions regarding universal waste management, please
contact Bryan Groce of my staff at (703) 308-8750.
Mtachment
cc: RCRA Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
State Authorization Section Chiefs, Regions I-X
RCRA Community Relations Coordinators, Regions I-X
RCRA Enforcement Branch Chiefs, Regions £-X
R.aycI.dm.cyc1ab . • P’ n edwrn Vegea Ie 01 Based tnks cc OO% Recyded Paper (40% Pcsxcanajmev)

-------
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS - - UNIVERSAL WASTES (UN)
1. Can a state include additional wastes in its UW program at
the same time that it establishes the program and then submit
both the program and the additional UW to EPA for authorization
review at the same time? For example, can a state adopt a 13W
rule that regulates fluorescent bulbs and antifreeze as UW?
Yes, a state can designate additional waste streams as UW at the
same time that it creates its own 13W rule. However, it must
find that the wastes meet its criteria for inclusion in the UW
program, and its criteria must be analogous to the federal
criteria set out in 273.81. See preamble to final UW rule at 60
FR 25512, 25537. The state need not submit the new wastes to EPA
for authorization. EPA will review and authorize the state’s UW
program (including the criteria for adding wastes to the program)
and the 3 waste streams included in the federal program. EP.A
will not conduct any authorization review on any additional,
state-only UN.
EPA, however, requests that states send copies of tentative
decisions to include new wastes (and proposed management
standards for such wastes) to the appropriate EPA Regional Office
to give EPA an opportunity to comment. See the response to
question 5 for more detail on this process.
2. Can a state itself petition the Agency to add wastes to the
federal UW rules - or does the petition have to come from a
private party?
A state itself can petition.
3. a. How will the petition process work at the state level?
Will it require public participation and rulemaking to add a 13W
to an authorized state program?
EPA is requiring states to adopt petition procedures equivalent
to the federal petition procedures. This requires states to
provide notice and an opportunity for public comment on any
tentative decision to grant or deny a petition to include new
universal wastes. See the preamble at 60 FR 25537. EPA also
assumes that the state will need to follow its normal rulemaking
procedures to create any new management standards needed for the
new UN.
1,. How will EPA adopt a UN - using the Federal Register and
public comment process?
Yes. As required by 40 CFR 260.20 Cc), if EPA receives a tJW
petition, it will publish a notice of tentative decision and
announce a comment period in the Federa L Register . After
considering all comments, EPA will publish notice of its final
2

-------
decision in the Federal Register . The se ine process applies to
both decisions to grant and to decisions to deny petitions.
4.a. Can a State add wastes that are state-only hazardous
wastes?
Yes. State hazardous waste programs can be more stringent and
broader in scope than federal programs. Consequently, states may
regulate as “state-only” hazardous wastes materials that are only
solid wastes under the federal program. States may streamline
their regulation of these “state-only” hazardous wastes by
including them in their UW programs.
b. Can a state add wastes that are non-hazardous?
Yes. A state could add non-hazardous solid wastes to its UW
program by designating such wastes as state-only hazardous wastes
and then designating them as UW wastes. Such wastes would be
subject to the state’s ordinary hazardous waste requirements for
treatment and disposal. EPA assumes that states would want this
result, because they probably would designate nonhazardous wastes
as universal wastes to divert them from the nonhazardous waste
disposal facilities that currently handle them. If, however, a
state determined that some aspects of its hazardous waste
management regime should not apply to these state-only hazardous
wastes, it could create exemptions. (Exemptions would be
permissible since the wastes would not be regulated as hazardous
wastes under the federal program.)
One exception applies. A state may not designate as a UW
any waste that is hazardous under the federal program due to a
rule promulgated under HSWA authority for which the state is not
authorized. (For example, a state that was not authorized for
the Toxicity Characteristic could not designate a waste that
exhibited the TC as a universal waste. See the preamble to the
final rule at 25537.)
5. After a state has adopted and is authorized for the UWR -
does the state have ultimate decision-making authority to add
wastes or does EPA still have involvement? And what is EPA’S role
during the petition process, post authorization?
States authorized for the UW rule will not be required to submit
program revisions for any addition of wastes to their 11W program.
EPA requests that states send a copy of their tentative findings
and any draft regulations for managing the new, state-only
universal wastes to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. This
will provide EPA with an opportunity to comment on the state’s
proposed action. EPA encourages states to coordinate EPA’s
review and comment with the opportunity to comment that the state
must provide for the public.
3

-------
If EPA finds that a state has added wastes that do not qualify,
or that the management standards are not sufficiently protective 1
and that, as a result, the state’s program is less stringent than
the federal program, EPA has authority to withdraw authorization
of the state’s hazardous waste program as provided in Part 271.
EPA will not conduct any authorization review of the new
state-only OW and new management standards.. EPA takes the
position that, when it authorizes a state to add wastes to the OW
category, it authorizes in advance the state’s new, state-only
universal wastes and the management standards for such wastes.
All changes to state regulations needed to implement aUW program
for the new UW automatically become ‘part of the authorized state
program once they take effect under state law.
6a. When will the EPA rule on fluorescent lights be final
(designation as a Federal UW vs. management as solid waste)?
EPA has not yet decided when it will promulgate a final rule
regarding regulation of fluorescent lamps as discussed in the
July 1994 proposal.
b. What happens if a state adds fluorescent lamps to its UWR and
then EPA decides to come out with a conditional exemption for
fluorescent lamps?
If the conditional exemption is less stringent than the state TJW
rule, the state would have the option of adopting the exemption,
but would not be required to do so.
7.a. Where do LDR recordkeeping requirements fit in --- only at
the final destination facility?
Yes.
b. Is the destination facility responsible (liable) for
identifying the treatment standards/technologies and filling out
certification forms?
Yes. The destination facility is the first entity that handles a
OW that is responsible for compliance with any of the LDR
requirements, including recordkeeping. For OW handlers that are
not subject to the LDR rules, the prohibitions on dilution under
the OW program provide the same protection as the dilution
prohibition under the L 2 DR program. (See. e.g., 40 CFR 273.11.)
8.a. Are all batteries included in the Federal UtAJR, or just those
considered hazardous?
4

-------
EPA’s federal tJW program does. not apply to all batteries. The
exceptions are listed in 40 CFR 273.2(b). Generally, the
battery must first be a waste. (Note that unused batteries are
not always wastes -- someone must first make a decision to
discard them (i.e., treat, recycle, or dispose of the unused
batteries)). Next, the battery must be classified as a hazardous
waste under either a hazardous waste listing or a characteristic
test and must not be generated by a household. One category of
batteries which are both wastes and hazardous wastes is
nevertheless exempt from the UW regulations in Part 273: spent
lead-acid batteries managed under 40 CFR Part 266. Finally, the
recently enacted “Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery
Management Act” changes states’ options for regulating some
batteries which are hazardous waste under RCRA. Specifically,
the law prohibits states from imposing requirements that are not
identical to those found in the May 11, 1995 Universal Waste rule
for the following types of hazardous waste batteries: used
rechargeable batteries, lead-acid batteries not covered by 40 CFR
part 266 subpart G, rechargeable alkaline products, certain
mercury-containing batteries banned from domestic sale, and used
consumer products containing rechargeable batteries that are not
easily removable. The law does allow states to implement and
enforce collection, storage, and transport requirements identical
to those included in the Universal Waste rule.
b. Do lead acid batteries fall under the tJWR or do they stay
under the lead-acid battery exemption?
Under the federal program, lead acid batteries are managed under
Part 266, subpart G rather than the UW program. EPA chose to
retain the Part 266 standards for these batteries to avoid
disrupting the existing recycling program for such batteries
because they provide for protection of human health and the
environment and because they have been highly successful (with
recycling rates in excess of 90 percent). States, however,
retain the authority to regulate lead-acid batteries more
stringently. Hence, they may choose to regulate lead acid
batteries under their UW programs.
9. A handler who transports UW is considered a UW transporter.
Is this for any quantity of UW (i.e., in the used oil regulations.
a used oil generator can transport up to 55 gallons of their own
used oil without being considered a used oil transporter)?
Yes, all handlers who transport any quantity of uw must .meet the
UW transporter requirements. There is no de minimis exemption
like the one in the used oil program.
10. Would a program consisting of a state-sponsored network of
handler locations at private businesses be considered a “waste
pesticide collection program”?
5

-------
Yes. Part 273 does not require states to operate the waste
pesticide collection programs described in 40 CFR §273.3(a) (2) in
order for the pesticides managed under such programs to be
eligible for the UW program.
11. As the UWR is implemented, do the traditional liability
issues change? For example, who is liable for any mismanag inent
of a UW at a handler location, in transit, and at the destination
facility? Are any and all handlers liable for mismanagement at a
destination facility or at subsequent handlers? Or, just the
“final handler” that chooses the destination facility? Do we
lose cradle—to-grave responsibility with UWR?
Under the full Subtitle C program, only the waste handler that
violates a hazardous waste regulation is “liable” (i.e., subject
to enforcement) for that violation. Generators of hazardous
waste are not responsible for mismanagement by subsequent waste
handlers. The UW rule does not change this allocation of
responsibility.
Generators are responsible for subsequent mismanagement
under CERCLA, however. The UW rule does not change CERCLA
liability. Since UW are still hazardous wastes, persons who
generate UW remain liable under CERCLA for remediation of any
releases of UW.
12. When UW is shipped to a destination facility, does it have
to be relabeled as HW at that facility, or will UW labeling be
sufficient?
Universal wastes remain hazardous wastes. Destination facilities
must comply with all currently applicable requirements for
hazardous waste management facilities. However, none of these
regulations require facility owners or operators to relabel the
containers holding universal wastes.
-13.a Handlers can keep UW on site up to one year after the date
it is received or generated. A year after a handler has received
a UW, can the UW go to another handler, or. must it go to
destination facility?
Universal waste can only be sent off-site to another universal
waste handler, destination facility, or foreign destination.
Theoretically, each receiving facility could accumulate the waste
for an entire year before sending it off to another handler,
however 1 the regulatory impact analysis EPA prepared for the UW
rulemaking indicates that there is no economic incentive for
retaining UW for such long periods.
b. Within that year, can the UW go to several handlers?
Yes, but states can adopt a more stringent rule that would
prevent this. Also, although theoretically wastes could go from
6

-------
one collection facility to another forever, the regulatory impact
analysis EPA prepared for the UW rulemaking indicates that there
is no economic incentive for retaining UW for such long periods.
14. Pesticides that are included in FIFRA recalls can be managed
under the UWR. Does this apply to pesticides that have been
included in past FIFRA recalls or just recalls instituted after
the UWR is adopted?
The timing of the recall is not significant. The UW rule is not
limited to pesticides that are recalled after the UW rule takes
effect.
15. Pesticides that are managed by farmers in accordance with 40
CFR 262.70 are not subject to the UW rules. Can farmers continue
to dispose of pesticides recalled under FIFRA under 262.70?
Yes, if a recall under FIFRA allows a farmer to dispose of a
pesticide on his own property, be may do so by complying with
262.70.
16. How are mixtures of UW and HW regulated -- as a HW if the HW
is listed or the mixture exhibits a characteristic? If the HW is
not listed, and the mixture of UW and HW does not exhibit a
characteristic, does IJDR apply to the mixture?
The UW rules apply only to wastes meeti±ig the criteria for being
classified as UW. They do not apply to mixtures of UW wastes and
ordinary, “non-universal” hazardous wastes. Such mixtures are
subject to the regular hazardous waste regulations.
However, the status of mixtures of characteristic UW and
characteristic hazardous wastes needs clarification. If the
mixture no longer exhibits a characteristic, it would no longer
be classified as a hazardous waste , but would remain subject to
the land disposal restrictions. Formerly characteristic wastes
are not excused from compliance with LDR treatment standards
merely because they cease to exhibit a characteristic.
In addition, two exceptions apply. First, mixtures of UW
and conditionally exempt small quantity generator (CESQG)
hazardous wastes are subject to UW rules. This is because CESQG
hazardous wastes are exempt from regular Subtitle C regulation.
See the UW preamble at 25510. By the same logic, mixtures of UW
wastes and hazardous wastes exempted under the household
hazardous waste provision are subject to the UW provisions rather
than the regular hazardous waste provisions.
The normal hazardous waste mixture rules would apply to
mixtures of uw and nonhazardous solid wastes. If the UW waste
were a listed waste, the mixture would be regulated as HW
(although initial handlers would be subject only to the UW
rules). If the Uw were a characteristic waste, and the mixture
ceased to exhibit the characteristic, the mixture would be
7

-------
northazardous but LDR treatment requirements would continue to
apply.
17. A large quantity universal waste handler (LQHUW) is required
to notify EPA of its universal waste management, unless it had
already so notified and received an EPA ID number. However,
won’t the LQHUW have to modify the initial notification to
explain this additional activity?
No. If a handler has previously notified EPA of his hazardous
waste management activities, he is not required to renotify.
First time notifiers can submit a one-time notification described
in 40 CFR 273.32(b), or alternatively, the 8700-12 notification
form. If the 8700-12 notification form is used, the LQHUW must
write “L,QHtJW” or “universal Waste” on the portion of the form
where activity is checked.
18. Does the UWR prohibit a generator from handling a 13W in
accordance with full RCRA C requirements, if desired?
The UWR requires a generator to handle their tJW under 273.
However, if the generator handles 13W under full RCRA C then it
would likely be complying with 273.
19. If a generator originates a shipment cf hazardous waste that
is considered a 1.1W in the receiving state, how does the generator
get a signed manifest?
The initiating facility (i.e., the generator) would complete a
manifest and give copies to the hazardous waste transporter as
required under 40 CFR 262.23(a). The initiating facility must
ensure that the manifest is forwarded to and signed by the 11W
receiving facility (i.e., the designated TSD facility) and then
sent back to the initiating facility.
20. a. Because a manifest is now not required, how will handlers
know how and when their 13W finally arrives at an appropriate
destination facility?
Depending on whether the 1 1W are shipped to another 13W handler or
a 13W destination facility, the initiating facility (i.e., the
generator) may not know if their 13W arrives at an appropriate
destination facility. For example, if the universal waste is
shipped to another universal waste handler (i.e., an interim
facility) before it is shipped to a designated facility, the
originating facility would only have knowledge of the initial
receiving facility. (See response to question 11). However, if
the originating facility (i.e., the generator) sent the universal
8

-------
waste to a destination facility, Part 273 requires the
originating facility to receive prior consent by a receiving
facility Ci . e., the destination facility) before the waste can be
sent off-site.
b. Does EPA intend for the original handler to “designate” all
the handlers arid final destination facility?
No. The original handler (i.e., the initiating facility) is only
responsible for designating the next UW handler (though the
original handler is free to elect to designate the final
destination facility).
21. What happens when UWR is adopted by a state but is not yet
authorized by EPA? What is EPA obligated to enforce?
EPA may only enforce the authorized state program. The
authorized program would continue to impose regular hazardous
waste management standards on UW handlers until EPA approved the
state’s UW rule. Note, however, that once the rule is approved,
designations of new, state-only TJW and management standards for
such wastes become part of the authorized program without action
by EPA. See the response to question 5 above.
The Agency has also issued a memorandum (See the April 10,
1996 Memorandum addressed to the Regional Administrators from
Steven A. Herman, Assistant Administrator of the Office of
Enforcement arid Compliance and Elliot P. Laws, Assistant
Administrator of the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response) which asks the EPA Regional offices to exercise
enforcement discretion (vis a vis uninanifested universal wastes)
in States that are authorized for the RCRA base program and that
are implementing the Part 273 standards but have not yet received
final EPA authorization to do so. The memorandum further
provides that the Regions should take enforcement actions
involving universal waste only where handlers of such wastes are
not in full compliance with the Part 273 standards. In other
words, the Agency will not take federal action against handlers
who manage hazardous waste batteries, hazardous waste pesticides,
and mercury-containing thermostats pursuant to Part 273 standards
in States that are currently in the process of adopting the
universal waste rule. States, of course, may still pursue
enforcement action against these handlers. The Agency hopes that
the April 10, 1996 letter will facilitate implementation of the
universal waste rule by states nationwide.
22. How are recycling facilities that receive UW regulated?
Recycling facilities are excluded from the definition of 13W
“handlers”. See 40 CFR 273.6. They are subject to normal
hazardous waste management requirements. Under those
requirements, storage prior to recycling is regulated and
requires a permit. See 40 CFR 261.6(c) (1). Many types of
9

-------
recycling. processes are. largely exempt from regulation (see. 40
CFR 261.6(d)); others (such as burning to recover energy or
materials) are regulated and require permits.
10

-------
MONTHLY HOTL 1NE REPORT
May 1997’ 9593 .1997(03)
2. Universal Waste Handler Status
40 CFR Pan 273 contains Iwo sets of
regulations for handlers of universal waste
based on the total amount of universal waste
generated or accumulated at any one time.
Section 273.6 defines a large quanthy handler
of universal waste (LQHUW) as a universal
waste handler that can accumulate 5.000
kilograms (kg) or more of universal waste at
their location at wry tuna In coraran. a small
qumuizy handler of universal waste (SQHCJW)
can accumulate less than £000 kg of
universal waste at any one time. if a handler
which generally qualifies as a SQ HUW has a
one-time accumulation of 5.000 kg or more.
but subsequently rranspons the waste off-site.
would the handler be regulated as a SQFIUW
orLQHTJW ?
Pursuant to 40 CFR §273.6, the handler
would be regulated as a LQHUW for the rest
of the calendar year in which the 5,000 kg or
more of universal waste was accumulated (see
aIso60f 25500: May I I. 1995).
A handler may reevaluate its rnnrt as a
LQHUW in the following calendar year. As a
result of the change from a SQHUW to a
LQEUW the hsn&er would. nee d to compLy
with ackfitional UnIversal waste rn n gement
regulaSn For enmpf t hatould
be required to obtain an EPA identi&azion
number if they had not already notified EPA
of hazardous waste management activities
( 273.32), and all employees would be
required to be thoroughly familiar with proper
waste handling and emergency procedures
relative to their responsibilities at the facility
( 27336). In addition, the handler would need
to keep a record of each shipment of universal
waste ( 273.39).

-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

-------
‘LJa’- tS7
4cc. 5 /a/f 7
p UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9593. 1997(04)
t4AYI3jggj
OFFICE OF
SCUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Chris Bryant
The Technical Group, Inc.
13001 Street ,NW
Suite 1000 West
Washington, D.C. 20005
Dear Mr. Bryant:
I am responding to your letter of Ianuaiy 29, 1997 in which you request clarification on
the labeling requirements under 40 CFR part 273 for hnsrdous waste batteries. Specifically, you
have requested confirmation that it is acceptable for large quantity handlers of universal waste
(LQHVW) to place universal waste labels prescribed ax §273.34(a) on shrink-wrapped pallets of
batteries rather than on each single battery.
For the purposes of complying with the requirements of 273.34(a), “container” is defined
at §260.10 as any portable device in which a material is stored, transported, treated , disposed of;
or otherwise handled. We believe that a shrink-wrapped unit (is, plastic shrink-wrapped over
spent batteries and pallet) can be a pdrtable device fbr the purposes ofl273.34(a). Further, the
Agency confirms that one of the following phrases: “Universal Waste—Batteiy ies);” or “Waste
Battezy(ies); “or “Waste Battery(ies);” or “Used Battery(ies) should be marked clearly on each
individual battery or on the outside of the shrink-wrapped plastic.
Although a shrink-wrapped unit can be a portable device for the purposes of part
273.34(a), the Agency has some concerns with respect to the effectiveness or structural integrity
of the shrink-wrapped plastic to prevent the components or contents of the batteries from leaking
or spilling into the environment. Under §273 .33(a)(1) LQHUWs must contain any battery that
shows evidence of leakage, spillage, or damage that could cause leakage under reasonably
foreseeable conditions in a contthuzer This container must be dosed, structurally sound,
compatible with the contents of the battery, and must lack evidence of leakage, spillage, or
damage that could cause leakage under reasonably foreseeable conditions.
Therefore the Agency has concluded that current regulations allow a LQHUW to shrink-
wrap multiple individual batteries in plastic and subsequently place the appropriate universal waste
label on the outside of the shrink-wrap unit, provided that the batteries which are shrink-wrapped
do not show evidence of leakage, spillage, or damage that could cause leakage under reasonable
foreseeable conditions. If a LQHUW determines that some batteries show evidence of leakage or
spillage after they are shrink-wrapped, then the LQHUW must place the shrink-wrapped unit in a
— — . . — . — — A ..

-------
container which complies with §273 .33(a)(l) and must relabel the container pursuant to
§273.34(a).
Please note that although non-leaking shrInk-wrap units meet EPA’s approval for
container from a universal waste labeling and management perspective, these units may not meet
the packaging specifications presaibed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) for your
particular battely types (j nickei-cadinium). The Agency recommends that you contact the
Department of Transportation to ensure that your shrink-wrapped units meet their packaging
authorization regulations for hazardous materials.
If you need additional imübrmation or have any questions about any of the above
information, please contact Bi yan Groce of my staff on (703) 308-8750.
Sincerely,
Acting Director
Solid Waste

-------
tHE TECHNICALGROLIP. I NC.
d
# —
ôr ” /
C
January 29, 1997
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro
Director
Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code 5301
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C 20460
received
1 4a/ 92}
RE: Universal Waste Labeling Requirements
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I write at the suggestion of Brian Gross of your office and Charles Openchowski
of the Office of General Counsel to request written clarification regarding the labeling
requirements for hazardous waste batterIes under the “Universal Waste Rule.”
I specifically request clarification as to the labeling requirements under the Part
273 regulations for nickel-cadmium and other hazardous waste batteries that may be
“shrink-wrapped” onto a pallet that then may be shipped to a reclamation facility. Such a
container could hold hundreds of nickel-cadmium batteries. Section 273.34(a) generally
requires that each universal waste battery or a container or tank in which batteries are
contained be labeled or marked clearly with one of several acceptable phrases. 1 write to
confirm that it is acceptable under § 273 .34(a) to attach a label to the outside of a shrink-
wrap unit of batteries rather than requiring the labeling of each battery in the unit.
The labeling requirements in § 273.34 do not preclude placing a label on the
surface of the shrink-wrap unit in lieu of a label on each battery in the shrink-wrap
1 recognize that State regulations may be more stringent than the Federal RCRA
standards or that State agencies may differ from EPA in their interpretations of
State-authorized RCRA standards.
Fn u,.nn,ntnt Oincutcinx
q
S
1 h ’ I TIttt1 \ \ St IT t It1 k %Ls1 . \ ASlII\cT( ?.. 0C20C05
‘..,‘‘‘—. I % o no

-------
THE TEcHN IcALGROUr , iNC.
Michael H. Shapiro
January 29. 1997
Page 2
container. Moreover, placing the label on the outside of a shrink-wrap unit arguably
satisfies this requirement because, for purposes of the Part 273 standards, the shrink-wrap
unit is a container.
Shrink-wrap units also are acceptable packaging under DOT’s Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMRs). 2 Furthermore, the HMRs require that these units meet
specific stringent conditions. 3 In addition, when batteries are packaged in shrink-wrap
units, § 172.406 of the HMRs requires that the DOT label “be placed on or affixed to a
surface (other than the bottom) of the package or containment device, containing the
hazardous material,” rather than on each battery.
Based on the foregoing, it is reasonable to conclude that the intent of § 273.34(a)
is satisfied when a large quantity handler places the universal waste label on the outside
of a shrink-wrapped pallet containing batteries. Requiring a label to be placed on each
individual battery in the packaging is burdensome, would provide no additional
protection of human health or the environment, and is contrary to DOT shipping
regulations.
Therefore, I respectfully request that you confirm, in writing, that EPA agrees it is
acceptable for a large quantity universal waste handler to place the universal waste label
on a shrink-wrapped pallet of batteries, rather than on each battery.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you or your staff have any
questions, or require additional information, please feel free to call me at (202) 962-8534.
Sincerely,
Chris Bryant/’
2 49 C.F.R. § 173. l59(c)(1).
Id. For example, the unit must be capable of withstanding the shocks normally
incident to transportation, must meet size requirements, and must be capable of
withstanding, without damage, a superimposed weight equal to two times the
weight of the unit.

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I WASHiNGTON, D.C. 20460
9593.1997(05)
NAY 6 CFF1CEOF
SOLID WASTE APID E1I R3BJCY
Mr. Thomas J. Schroeder RESPONSE
2127 Tartan Road
Anderson, Indiana 46012
Dear Mr. Schroeder
Thank yOu for your letter of April 5,1997 to Administrator Browner regarding the
collection and. recycling of household batteries. We appreciate your interest in this
subject, as well as your efforts to suggest an innovative action plan to battery
manufacturers.
In your letter you suggested that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
recommend s collection and recycling approach such as yours to industry. EPA does
not have the authority to require battery manufacturers to take baCk their products for
recycling once They are Used. Ukewise, EPA can not require states or local
communities to collect and recycle batteries. The collection, transfer, recycling and
disposal’of municipal solid waste, incl iding batteries, fall under the purview of state
and local gávemments. In fact, several states have already passed laws governing the
collection and recycling of batteries.
While there is no federal law mandating the recycling of batteries, there is a
federal law that facilitates the voluntary collection and recycling of certain household
batteries. The Mercury-Containing end Rechargeable Battiry Management Act (the
Battery Act) was signed by President Clinton on May 13, 1996. I have enclosed a copy
of the Act for your information. The law has two primary goals, the first of which is to
limit the mercury content in consumer batteries. The second is to promote recycling
arid proper disposal 0? used rechargeable nickel cadmium (Ni-Cd) batteries, small
sealed lead acid rechargeable batteries, and certain other types of rechargeable
batteries now widely used in consumer products. In order to achieve the second goal,
the law (1) requires that Ni-Cd and small sealed lead acid rechargeable batteries in
products manufactured after May 13, 1997 be easily removable from the products;
(2) establishes uniform national labeling requirements for Ni-Cd and small sealed lead
acid rechargeable batteries; and, (3) requIres that collection, storage, and
transportation of used recha geabIe batteries be managed according to standards
established in the May 11, 1995 Universal Waste Rule (60 FR 25492). 1 have enclosed
a copy of this rule for your information.

-------
2
In this way, the Battery Act removed obstacles to a voluntary Industry take-back
system. EPA Is aware that such a system is being implemented for the nationwide
collection and recycling of Ni-Cd batteries. The Rechargeable Battery Recyàling
Corporation (RBRC) physically administers this system, which is funded by a licensing
fee charged to rechargeab leproduct and Ni-Cd battery manufacturers whih place the
RBRC seal on their products. Retailers and communities receive free collection kits
from RBRC; which are used to collect N . .CDI from consumers. RBRC then pays for
the transportation of the collected batteries to the recycling facility._Consumers may
locate the retailer or community nearest them by ailing I -800-8BA i I tRY. To find out-
more about this system, I sug9est that you call Jeff Bagbyof RBRC, at (540) 720-9225.
EPA is involved in a number of efforts that encourage source reduction and
recycling of municipal solid waste, including batteries. 1 have enclosed one EPA
document that addresses battery recycling specifically, “Used Dry Cell Batteries: I. a
Collection Program Right for Your Community?” This document discusses battery
collection and recycling programs in great detail and provides an overview of some of
the local collection programs in operation throughout the United States.
Thank you again far your thoughtful interest in the co llectionand recycling of
household batteries. The success of recycling in this country depends on the concerns
and efforts of individuals like you.
Sincerely yours,
EI&2heth A. Cotsworth, Acting Director
Office of Solid Waste
Enclosures

-------
4/5,97
Carol Browner, Adrn.inIstrator
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
40 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Ms. Browner:
Last fall, I sent the attached proposal to. a couple of companies
that manufacture the typical household batteries. .The response
was not favorable. After reading ‘your “Ask The Expert” comment
in the April 1997 Good Housekeeping, I felt the •issue of
recycling of batteries is being addressed, but not to the extent
that could be done using tne approach i suggest. If the industry
does not consider the proposal acceptable, it may be appropriate
for the EPA to recommend such San-approach.
Resp tfull
I omas J Schroeder
2127 Ta#tan.Road
Anderson, IN 46012

-------
Proposal:
To develop and/or expand a recycling program for standard house hold and
mercury batteries on a scale equal to or greater than that of aluminum can
recycling.
Action plan:
This goal could be accomplished by developing a vendi g machine for
dispensing batteries that would at the same time, accept used
batteries. A pay back element could be incorporated into the design of the
machine to encourage recycling.
The recycling program would begin with the manufacturing of the
battery by encoding each battery so it could be identified when it is
deposited in the recycling portion of the vending machine.
By locating the recycling station at the same point as sales, the distributor
would act as the entry point for recycling. This offers many advantages
when compared to aluminum can recycling which requires a separate
collection, i.e. reverse distribution, system.
The recycling station could also be a separate station, apart from sales,
however the concept of encoding each battery for proper identification
would be required.

-------