United States
Environmental Protection
Agency New England
2003/Superfund Annual Report
A status report on the New England
Superfund remedial, removal,
brownfields, oil spill and
emergency response programs.
-------
U.S. EPA New England fl United States
Environmental Protection
TabIe of Contents # Agency New England
CONNECTICUT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Overview 2
National Priorities List 6
Map 14
Sites of Special Interest 1 6
Watch List 20
Emergency Planning & Response Program 24
Brownfie lds 27
-------
U.S. EPA New England Il A United States
Environmental Protection
Introduction Agency New England
WELCOME TO EPA NEW ENGLAND
.. The New England office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is
dedicated to protecting all New Englanders from environmental health threats
while also preserving and protecting our unique environmental resources.
This 2003 annual report details EPA New England’s Office of Site
Remediation and Restoration programmatic accomplishments and
presents important information about funding for our Superfund and
Brownfields programs. The Superfund program directs the clean up of
National Priorities List (NPL) sites as well as the cleanup of smaller, often
less complex, sites that pose a significant risk to people or the environ-
ment. This office is prepared to handle a broad spectrum of environmen-
tal emergencies, ranging from those posed by chemical or oil spills to
those presented by potential acts of terrorism. This office also administers
the region’s Brownfields program, oversees the regulation of underground storage tanks, and works
with hazardous waste facilities to clean up contamination and create better systems for managing
environmental threats.
Our New England Superfund program remains vital and boasts strong successes. Three-quarters of
the 111 sites on the NPL are either undergoing or have completed construction of cleanup technolo-
gies. Nearly one-third of the sites are already being reused or have agreed upon productive reuse
plans. Ten sites have been deleted from the NPL, having met all cleanup goals. Through an aggres-
sive regional program to recoup federal expenses at these sites or to have responsible parties pay
for the cleanup, we have restored $2.1 billion to the Superfund Trust Fund since the program began.
In early 2004, EPA added the Pike Hill Copper Mine in Corinth, Vermont to the NPL.
In addition, this office joins the entire agency in a focused federal effort to ensure that all New
England residents enjoy the benefit of a healthy environment. The federal government recognizes the
importance of environmental justice, and EPA seeks to protect all our communities from environmen-
tal threats.
Homeland Security continues to be a regional priority, and we have made many advances in
our ability to respond to chemical, biological and radiological incidents. EPA has purchased
updated chemical and radiological agent monitoring equipment and new protective equipment for
response personnel. The region’s mobile command post has been equipped with cell, satellite, and
radio communications, a weather station, satellite television, and broadband internet. The region’s
emergency response staff have received advanced training that well prepares them to respond, along
with local, state and federal response partners to environmental or other catastrophic events.
The agency’s Land Revitalization Agenda has resulted in many underused or unused real estate
parcels being redeveloped and contributing to the local economy in the way of taxes and jobs.
I encourage you to visit EPA’s Brownfields website to read case studies of redevelopment projects
across the region, www. epa . gov/ne/Brownfields .
We look forward to another year of working with our Congressional delegation, states and tribes,
the public and others to promote a cleaner, healthier and more productive environment.
Please visit EPA’s Internet web pages to find a great deal of useful information as well as detailed
descriptions of each of the Superfund sites in New England. Bookmark the following web addresses:
www.epa gov/ne/su perfund and www. epa. gov/ne/brownfields
RobertW. Varney
Regional Administrator
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 1
-------
Overview
Following is a quick summary of EPA New England’s Office of
Site Remediation and Restoration (OSRR) programs highlighted
in this report.
NIafional Priorities List (Superfund) Program
OSRR’s remedial branches oversee long-term cleanups of sites that are typically on EPAs National
Priorities List Short-term cleanups can corred many hazardous waste problems and eliminate most
threats to human health and the environment Some sites, however, require lengthier and more
complex cleanups These may include large-scale soil remediation, restoring groundwater and
taking measures to protect wetlands, estuaries, and other ecological resources These sites are often
caused by years of pollution and may take several years, even decodes, to clean
Emergency Planning and Response Program
OSRR’s Emergency Planning and Response branch prepares for and conducts responses to
discharges of oil and releases of hazardous substances In addition to planning and preparing for
regional emergency responses, getting readyfor counter-terrorism activities, inspecting oil storage
facilities, cleaning up emergency oil and chemical spills, this branch oversees time-critical short-
term cleanups in New England
Short-term cleanups, also referred to as “removal actions,” address immediate threats to public
health and the environment Short-term cleanups may take anywhere from a few days to a few years,
depending on the type and extent of contamination
Brownfields Program
Originally established as on EPA initiative in January 1 995, the Browrifields program has evolved
into an effort involving more than 1 5 federal partners This collaborative effort, referred to as the
Brownfields National Partnership, was created in June 1 997 to promote beneficial reuse of contami-
nated sites EPA’s Brownfields Program consists of various initiatives designed to work with local,
state and tribal partners to reuse brownfields in environmentally sound ways driven by the commu-
nity Key Brownfields programs include Site Assessment Demonstration Pilots, Targeted Brownfields
Assessments, Cleanup Revolving Loan Funds, Job Training Grants, Showcase Communities and
financial help to state brownfields programs, including Voluntary Cleanup Programs
21’ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England II A United States
w Environmental Protection
Overview Agency New England
— Include Siti _____
Study Type &
Extent of
____ I Contamination
[ O
Propose
SUPERFUND
FWfl Djscovery to Cleanup
State L d Cleanup I
identity Those
Respon&bIe
for Pollution ______
Short term actions may
be taken to ellmhiale
knmedlate public beau
u wn M 1 ttweats
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 3
-------
Number of National Priorities List Sites
in each phase of the Superfund Process
-
AT
Remedial
Assessment
Study
Underway*
Remedy Selected;
Design Underway*
Construction
Underway
Construction
Complete**
not Begun*
* may include sites where early action has occurred ** long-term monitoring, operation, and maintenance ongoing
Source: Superfund e-facls. February 2004
Overview
60
50
40
*
a,
Co
Lu
a,
z
0
a)
E
z
30
20
10
0
4 SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS SUMMARY
U.S. EPA New England I p uit states
Overview Environmental Protection
Agency New England
Remedial Study Remedy Construction Construction
Assessment Underwoy Selected; Design Underway Complete”
not Begun Underway
CONNECTICUT
Broad Brook Mill’
Durham Meadow
Linemoster Sw
Beacon Heights
Nutmeg Volley Rd
N London Sub
Cheshire GWciter
Precision Plating
Old Southington
Gallups Quarry
Scovill Landfill
Roymork
Kellogg-Deering
SRS
Laurel Pork
Revere Textile
Yaworski Lagoon
Barkhomsted
MASSACHUSETTS
Haverhill Landfill
Sutton Brook
Blockburn&Union
GE-Housotoriic ”
Haih & Patterson
Nuclear Metals
Shpack Landfill
Atlas Tack
Natick Army Lab
Naval Weapons
S Weymouth NAS
Fort Devens
Hariscom AFB
Industriplex
Iron Horse Pork
Army Mcitls Tech
New Bedford
Nyanza
Otis ANG Base
Silresim
WR Groce/Acton
Wells G&H
Baird & McGuire
Cannon Erig
Charles George LF
Devens-Sudbury Ann
Grovelond Wells
Hocomonco Pond
Norwood PCBs
Plymouth Harbor
PSC Resources
Re-Solve, Inc
Rose Disposal Pit
Salem Acres
Sullivan’s Ledge
Callahan Mine
Eastlond Woolen
West Site/Hows Cor
Portsmouth NSY
Bwnswick NAS
Eastern Surplus
bring AFB
McKin Co
O’Connor Co
Pineite’s Salvage
Saco Municipol IF
Saco Tannery
Union Chemical
Winthrop Landfill
Mohowk Tannery”
Beede Wosie Oil
Dover Landfill
Fletcher’s Point
N H Plating
Ottati & Goss
Savage Muni
Somersworih LF
Auburn Road IF
Cookley Landfill
Kearsarge Metallurg
Keefe Enviro
Mottolo Pig Farm
Pease AFB
South Mum Well
Sylvester
Tibbetts Road
Tinkham Goroge
Town Goroge/
Radio Beac
RHODE ISLAND
Central Landfill
Davis Liquid
Dovisville NCBC
Newport NETC
Peterson/Puritan
Davis GSR Landfill
Landfill & Res Rec
Picillo Form
Stamina Mills
Westem Sand & Gesvel
Elizabeth Mine
Ely Copper Mine
Parker Landfill
Pine Street Canal
Pownal Tannery
Bennington Landfill
BFI Landfill
Burgess Bros LF
Darling Hill Dump
Old Springfield LF
Tansitor Electronics
may include sites where early actions (e g, removal actions) have occurred or are underway
“long-term monitonng, operation, and maintenance ongoing
A proposed NPL sue
“ past wetlands purchase considered remedial action”, awaiting funding for actual construction work
Note Statistics represent most-advanced Operable Unit at each site, additional activities may be ongoing at these sites
MAINE
NEW HAMPSHIRE Troy Mills landfill
Centredale Manor Rose Hill Londfill
W Krngston/URI
VERMONT
SUPERFUNI) ANNUAl REPORT 2003 ,‘ 5
-------
National Priorities List Sites
Summary of Superfund Status—New England
EPA has worked aggressively to clean up hazardous waste problems in
New England. In cooperation with our state counterparts, final cleanup
activities are completed, underway, or in design at most of New England’s
ill NPL sites.
• 76% of New England Superfund sites (proposed, final, and deleted)
on the National Priorities List - 82 of 111 sites - have undergone or
are undergoing cleanup construction
• 53 sites have all cleanup construction completed, 29 sites have
cleanup construction underway
• 10 New England sites have been deleted from the NPL.
• EPA has helped promote economic development by removing 1,594
sites in New England from the CERCLIS list of waste sites.
• The Superfund program has spent over $1.3 billion in New England
to cleanup Superfund National Priorities List sites.
• EPA has spent over $21 1.2 million on site assessment, investigation,
and cleanup at non- National Priorities List sites in New England
• EPA, with the cooperation of the U S Department of Justice,
continues to ensure that companies responsible for contamination at
sites pay their fair share of cleanup costs. Since the inception of the
program, responsible party commitments to cleanups in New
England, via direct payments to the Superfund Trust Fund or via
funding of studies and cleanup work, exceeds $2.1 billion
Source EPA New England, January 1, 2004
Cumulative Federal Superfund Dollars Expended at
National Priorities List Sites in New England (1980-2003)
CT $197 9 million
MA $759 2 million
ME $1 1 7 million
NH $1562 million
RI $73 5 million
VT $ 15 million
NEW ENGLAND TOTALS
$1,348,800,000
/
Source EPA New England, January 1, 2004
CONNECTICUT
(
K
6/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England I1 A United States
Environmental Protection
National Priorities List Sites % Agency New England
2003 Superfund Fast Facts—Connecticut
EPA has worked aggressively to clean up hazardous waste problems in
Connecticut In cooperation with the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection, final cleanup activities are completed,
underway, or in design at most of Connecticut’s 18 NPL sites.
• 72% of Connecticut’s Superfund sites on the Notional Priorities List—
13 of 18 sites—have undergone or are undergoing cleanup
construction, or are in final design
• 8 Superfund sites have all cleanup construction completed, 5 sites
have cleanup construction underway.
• 2 Superfund sites have been deleted from the National Priorities List;
Cheshire Groundwater Contamination in Cheshire and Revere Textile
Prints Corp. in Sterling.
• 1 site has been proposed to the National Priorities List; Broad Brook
Mill in East Windsor
• Region has helped promote economic redevelopment by removing
387 Connecticut sites from the CERCIIS waste list.
• The Superfund Program has spent over $197.9 million in Connecticut
to clean up Superfund National Priorities List sites.
• EPA has spent over $69.8 million on site assessment, investigation,
and cleanup at non-National Priorities List sites in Connecticut
• EPA, with the cooperation of the U S. Department of Justice,
continues to ensure that companies responsible for contamination at
sites pay their fair share of cleanup costs Since the inception of the
program, responsible party commitments to cleanups in Connecticut,
via direct payments to the Superfund Trust Fund or via funding of
studies and cleanup work, exceeds $267.8 million, including $4.4
million in 2003
Source EPA New England, January 1, 2004
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 7
-------
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites
CONNECTICUT
Barkhamsted
Barkhamsted/New Hartford Landfill
for more information on this project, see www epogov/ne/superfund/
sites/barkhamsted
NPL Status Listed in 1989
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed ri 2001
L__Superfund $$ Spent $2 5 million
Beacon Falls
Beacon Heights Landfill
for more information on this project, see www.epcl ov/ne/superIund/
sites/beacon
NPLStatus Listed in 1983
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 1 998
Superfund $$ Spent $3 7 million
Canterbury
Yaworski Lagoon
for more information on this project, see www epa ov/ne/superfund/
sites/yaworski
NPLStatus Listed in 1983
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 2000
L__Superfund$$Spent $lOmillion
Cheshire
Cheshire Groundwater Contamination
for more information on this project, see www epa gov/ne/superfund/
sites/cheshire
r NPL Status Deleted in 1997
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 1 997
L__Superfund $$ Spent $427,000
8/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England United States
. . . Environmental Protection
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites # Agency New England
Durham
Durham Meadows
for more information on this pro,ect, see www.epa.gov/rie/superfund/
sttes/durham
NPL Status Listed in 1 989
Cleanup Status Study Underway
Superfund$$Spent $1 4 million
East Windsor
Broad Brook Mill
for more information on this pro,ect, see www.epo.gov/ne/superfund/
tes/braadbrook
NPL Status Proposed in 2000
Cleanup Status Assessment Not Begun
Superfund $$ Spent $391,000
Groton and Ledyard
New London Submarine Base
for more information on this prolect, see www.epa.gov/ne/superiund/
s rteslnewlondon
NPL Status Listed in 1990
Cleanup Status Study, Design, and
Construction Underway
Superfund $$ Spent $2 1 million
Naugatuck
Laurel Park
for more information on this pro,ect, see www.epo aov/ne/superfund/
sites/lourelpork
NPL Status Listed in 1 983
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 1 998
Superfund $$ Spent $3 million
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 9
-------
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites
CONNECTICUT
Norwalk
Kellogg-Deering Welifield
for more information on this protect, see www epa nov/nelsuperfund/
sites/kellogg
C NPL Status Listed in 1984
Cleanup Status All Coristrudion Completed in 1996
perfund $$ Spent $2 3 million
Plainfield
Gallup’s Quarry
for more information on this project, see www epa ov/ne/superfund/
sites/gallup
NJPL Status Listed in 1 989
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 1 997
Superfund$$Spent $1 S million _ )
Southington
Old South ington landfill
for more information on this project, see www epa gov/ne/superfund /
it /r lrIcr,t
.-. -—,---.-,--JIuI”I I’-,.
NPL Status Listed in 1 984
Cleanup Status
Landfill Cap Construction Complete
Groundwater Study Underway
Superfund $$ Spent $6 8 million
Solvents Recovery Service Niew England
for more information on this project, see www epa çov/ne/superfund/
sites/srs
NPL Status Listed in 1 983
Cleanup Status Study Underway, Removal Activities
L Superfund $$ Spent $9 8 million
10/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England I1 A United States
Environmental Protection
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites # Agency New England
Sterling
Revere Textile
for more information on this pro,ect, see www epa gpv/ne/superfund/
sites/revere
NPL Status Deleted in 1 994
Cleanup Status All Construction Completed in 1 992
Superfund $$ Spent $2 3 million
Stratford
Raymark Industries
for more information on this pro,ect, see www.epo gov/ne/superfund/
sites/raymark
/ NPL Status Listed in 1 995
Cleanup Status
Facility Property Construction Complete
Other Areas Study Underway
Superfund$$Spent $145 7 million
Vernon
Precision Plating Corporation
for more information on this protect, see www.epa.gov/ne/superlund/
sites/precision
NPL Status Listed in 1 989
Cleanup Status Study Underway
Superfund $$ Spent $103,000
Waterbury
Scovill Industrial Landfill
for more information on this pro,ect, see www epa gov/ne/superfund/
sites/scovilt
NPL Status Listed in 2000
Cleanup Status Study Underway
Superfund$$Spent $1 4 million
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 11
-------
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites
Wolcott
Nutmeg Volley Road
formore information on this project, see wwwepo 9ov/ne/superfund/sites/nufmeg
L
NPL Status Listed in 1 989
Cleanup Status Study Underway
Superfund $$ Spent $2 5 million
Woodstock
Linem aster Switch Corporation
for more information on this project, see www epa.gov/ne/superIund/sites/
linemaster
1 PL Status Listed in 1990
Cleanup Status Construction Underway
_Superfund $$ Spent $1 8 million
CONNECTICUT
12/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England
Status of New England National Priorities List Sites
EPA United States
Environmentat Protection
Agency New England
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 13
-------
Map
14/SUPERFUND ANNUA [ REPORT 2003
-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY
-------
U.S. EPA New England I EPA
Map Environmental Protection
Agency New England
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 15
-------
Sites of Special Interest
CONNECTICUT
DURHAM MEADOWS
Durham, Connecticut
Apnl 2004
Lead: EPA, State, and PRP
Listed on the NPL: October 1 989
Site Description :
• The Durham Meadows Superfund site is located in the Town of Durham, Connecticut, and
includes an area of groundwater contamination generally centered on Main Street Investigation
of the site currently centers on the Durham Manufactunng Company and the former location of
Merriam Monufacturing Company, both locoted on Main Street Both companies manufacture
metal cabinets, boxes and other items The companies’ past disposal of wastewaler in lagoons
or sludge drying beds (formerly accepted waste management practices), and inadequate drum
storage at the Merriam Manufacturing Company, among other things, contributed to the
contamination
• In 1982, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP) detected volatile
organic compounds (VOCs - commonly found in solvents, paints and degreasers) in private
drinking water wells in the Durham area Under a CT DEP order, Merriam Manufacturing and
Durham Manufacturing installed carbon filters on impacted residential wells EPA placed the
Durham Meadows site on the NPL in October 1 989
• All impacted wells are currently fitted with two carbon filters The Iwo companies ore monitor-
ing and maintaining 35 filtered wells on a quarterly basis Merriam Manufacturing Company
services 23 of these wells The remaining 12 wells are maintained and monitored by Durham
Manufacturing Company Additionally, a school located on Main Street monitors and maintains
its own filters CT DEP periodically samples dnnking water wells beyond the contaminated ground-
water zone in order to confirm that those wells continue to provide clean water
Current Site Status and Cleanup Actions to Date :
• In 1 997, the Durham Manufacturing Company signed an administrative agreement with
EPA to conduct Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) work EPA arid the Durham
Manufacturing Company began investigations into the nature and extent of groundwater
contamination in 1998 Durham Manufacturing Company performed sampling work at
residential wells in the southern portion of the site and also performed field investigations on its
own property Since the Merriam Manufacturing Company and its president, Allan Adams,
refused to enter into this agreement, EPA performed groundwater sampling and analysis work at
residential wells in the northern portion of the site in 1 998
• In the Summer of 2003, EPA’s contractor performed work at the former location of the Merriam
Manufacturing Company, including soil and soil vapor sampling, to more fully define the nature
and extent of contamination on that property EPA is also assessing the degree of human health
and ecological risks at the entire site
• In December 2003 and January 2004, EPA, in conlunction with CT DEP and the Connecticut
Department of Public Health (CT DPH), sampled a limited number of private wells in the area to
supplement the 1998 groundwater data and to investigate the potential presence of a newly
identified contaminant, 1 ,4-Dioxane 1 ,‘l-Dioxane was detected in several private wells in
untreated water, and in some cases, in fully treated water (tap water) There is no federal or
Connecticut-specific drinking water standard for 1 ,4-Dioxane CT DPH and EPA-New England
16/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England II A United States
Environmental Protection
Sites of Special Interest # Agency New England
have determined that the detections of 1 ,4-Dioxane in dnnking water do not warrant immediate
action at this time, however, the agencies are working together to continue monitoring for the
presence of this contaminant
• The remedial investigation at the site is ongoing EPA and the State of Connecticut ore
currently discussing the need for additional work, specifically the need for additional well
sampling which EPA expects to perform in Spnng 2004 All remedial investigation field work is
expected to be completed in calendar year 2004 EPA is currently scheduled to issue a plan
outlining the proposed remedy for the site in June 2005
Current Funding Status :
• EPA has spent approximately $630,000 in contractor costs for investigations and analysis at
the site since 1 997
• Durham Manufactunng Company has paid approximately $362,000 in oversight bills to EPA
during the remedial investigation.
• At the time the Rl/FS administrative agreement was signed, unrecovered past costs were
approximately $1 million
Key Accomplishments :
• EPA has substantially completed most of the Rl/FS field work on the property owned by the
Merriam Mariufactunng Company
• EPA is working closely with the state agencies to further investigate the presence of a newly
identified contaminant, 1 ,4-Dioxane, and ensure the protection of public health
SUPERFUND ANNUM REPORT 2003 / 17
-------
Sites of Special Interest
CONNECTICUT
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC.
Stratford, Connecticut
April 8, 2004
Lead Federal NPL
Listing 4/25/1 995
Site Description :
Raymork Industries, Inc was located at 75 East Main Street in Stratford, Fairfield County,
Connecticut, and operated from 1919 to 1989 Raymark primarily manufactured friction
materials for the automotive industry, which contained asbestos, metals, phenol-formaldehyde
resins, and various adhesives Throughout its years of operation, a wide array of wastes were
generated, including asbestos, lead, polychlorinafed biphenyls (PCBs), and a variety of volatile
organic solvents, including toluene, trichloroethylene (ICE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
During its 70 years of operation, the facility discharged process waters to a number of lagoons
located on the 34-acre East Main Street property As the solids in these process waters settled
out, the lagoons were periodically excavated and the material disposed of both at the facility as
well as at various locations throughout the Town of Stratford This excavated, contaminated
material has impacted over 250 acres at over 75 locations in Stratford Groundwater on and
emanating from the former facility is also contaminated, however, the impacted area is served by
a public water supply
Current Site Status and Cleanup Actions to Date :
• Iii 1 992, EPA installed a temporary soil cover and fenced the 1 4-acre, Raybestos Memorial
Ballfield which reportedly received approximately 100,000 cubic yards of Raymark waste material
• During 1992-1995, EPA performed numerous cleanups at 47 residential and municipal
properties throughout Stratford which were found to hove received Raymark waste material
The excavated material was transported back to former Raymark facility and capped
• EPA issued a cleanup decision (commonly referred to as the Record of Decision - ROD) in
1995 for the 34-acre Raymark facility The ROD principally addressed the contamination at the
facility and the excavated material transported back to the facility between 1 992-1995 through
capping
• By 1997, EPA demolished the former Raymark facility buildings, installed subsurface
recovery systems for dense non-aqueous phase liquids and contaminated soil vapors identified
on-site, and completed the construction of the permanent cap over the entire 34-acre former
facility In addition, working with a prospective developer of the Raymark property, the design
and construction incorporated clean corridors for utilities and subsurface stabilization work to
enable future redevelopment (see Key Accomplishments below)
• In August 2000, EPA completed the installation of a temporary cap over a 4-acre section
of Shore Road and the Housatonic Boat Club which contained Raymark waste material
This action followed the installation of a plastic fabric barrier and wood chips by the CTDEP in
1 993 when contamination was first discovered in this area
• Between 2001 and 2004, EPA, working with the CTDE installed sub-slab ventilation
systems in over 1 00 residential homes These systems were installed to address potential indoor
air impacts resulting from volatilization of contaminated groundwater which originates from the
former Raymark facility
18/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England il A Uni ed States
Environmental Protection
Sites of Special Interest Agency New Engtand
This Raymark site continues to have a high level of community interest. EPA is currently
working with a citizens advisory group, the Roymark Advisory Committee (RAC), that was formed
in June 2000 This group, compnsed of citizens from several affected neighborhoods, generally
meets monthly with EPA, CTDEP and Stratford officials to progress of the Superfund cleanup
Current Funding Status :
To date, EPA has expended approximately $1 90 million for investigation and cleanup activities
related to Roymark waste disposal locations in the Town of Stratford
The Roymark property at 75 East Main Street was sold at bankruptcy sale in 2000 From this
sale, EPA received $19.4 million which was placed in a dedicated Special Account for the
Raymork site Approximately $2.5 million in interest on the amount in this Special Account has
been collected
Approximately $10 million has been earmarked from the Special Account to undertake Remedial
Investigation (RI) activities, prepare Feasibility Study (FS) reports, address the indoor air
contamination issue noted above, fund the RAC activities since June 2000, and provide the
State of Connecticut, USGS and ACOE funds for technical support activities
Presently, a balance of $1 2+ million exists in the dedicated Raymork Special Account
In addition, EPA has an additional $ 3 million in a State Superfund Account that was established
in 1997 as part of the State of Connecticut’s cost share for cleanup of the Raymork facility at 75
East Main Street
For more information on this site, please read the Fact Sheet on the EPA Region I/New England
Superfund Web site www epa gov/region0l /superfund/sites/rayrnark
Key Accomplishments :
In 2002, the redevelopment of the former Raymark facility was completed with the construction of
the Stratford Crossing Shopping Center, which contains a Home Depot, Shows Supermarket,
and a Walmart These three stores employ over 650 people
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 19
-------
Watch List
CONNECTICUT
CONNECTICUT WATCH LIST
Sites included on the “Watch List” are those that both the state and EPA Site Assessment
programs agree merit increased state-federal coordination and oversight These sites are but a
small subset of the several thousand “active” sites included in the EPA Region 1 and New
England state inventories of known and suspected hazardous waste disposal sites Criteria for
including sites on the Watch List are loosely defined In general, the Watch List includes sites that
warrant special monitoring because they are strong NPL candidates, are the subiect of
considerable public interest, are particularly large and/or complex, are requiring significant
Agency or state resource expenditures, or are state-lead sites that may be referred to EPA Watch
List sites may be, but are not necessanly, listed in the federal CERCLIS inventory Sites may be
added or dropped as their status changes
The purpose of the Watch List is to facilitate rapid information exchange between the states and
EPA regarding the current status of these high profile sites, and to ensure both Agencies are kept
abreast of key site issues Both Agencies hove agreed to share site information and to revise the
status of sites as needed At a minimum, however, the entire list will be reviewed and revised, as
appropriate, annually
NEWHALL STREET NEIGHBORHOOD, HAMDEN
CTD982544355
The Newall Street Neighborhood site consists of an approximately 100 acre area occupied by Hamden
Middle School, Hamden Community Center, two public parks ond about 1 5 blocks of residential
properties Histonc accounts indicate that large portions of the site were formerly occupied by wetlands
that were filled with industnal and municipal solid waste beginning in the early 1 900s From the 1 920s
through the 1 960s, many of the filled areas were developed for parks, a school, and residential use
The full extent of landfilling ri the neighborhood has not yet been determined The pnmar’y contaminants
of concern are lead, arsenic and polyriuclear aromatic hydrocarbons Additional pollutants found ri
subsurface soils and waste include extractable total petroleum hydrocarbons (ETPH), BTEX compounds,
PCBs, and the metals mercury, antimony and thallium Hydrogeologic investigation has identified
metals and ETPH in groundwater at the site and a discrete plume of chionnated solvents underlying
portions of the Middle School property
On April 1 6,2003, a consent order was finalized between Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection (CT DEP) and the parties responsible for creating or maintaining pollution at the site
Responsible parties performing investigation and remediation of different portions of the site include
Olin Corporution, the Town of Homden, and the South Central Connecticut Regional WaterAuthonty
(SCCRWA) Olin Corporation has submitted a work plan to DEP to continue investigation in the
residential, “non-public properties,” part of the site Investigation in this area is expected to commence
in spnng 2004 following DEP review and approval of the work plan DEP is currently reviewing initial
investigation reports for the Hamden Middle School properly prepared by the SCCRWA and the parks
prepared by the town It is likely that some additional charoctenzation of these portions of the site will be
necessary before remedial alternatives can be developed
As port of the consent order, DEP agreed to develop and implement a public participation plan to keep
the community informed of the investigation and remediation process as well as to solicit public
comment throughout the process DEP is holding quarterly public meetings, prepanng quarterly
newsletters and hosting additional meetings and open houses to share proposed work plans and results
of investigations
Newhall Street was included ri the GAO report of sites awaiting NPL decision This is not a
RCRA corrective action site
20/ SIJPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England II A United States
Environmental Protection
Watch List Agency New England
EAST MAIN STREET DISPOSAL AREA, BRANFORD
CTSFNO1 03051
The site compnses four properties three residential properties (including Shoreline Mobile Home
Court, 509-54 5 East Main Street), and one commercial property (6-12 Business Park Drive)
A wetland formerly existed at the rear of the properties Aerial photographs and anecdotal
evidence indicate that the wetland was filled beginning in the late 1 960s and continuing until
approximately 1 981 Samples collected by CT DEP staff in July and October of 2003 show that
PAH contaminated soil is present in the filled areas on each property Based on the results of the
initial sampling, DEP staff notified CT Department of Public Health (DPH), local officials, and
affected residents in late September 2003 DEP formally requested assistance from EPA’s
Emergency Removal group on September 29, 2003
The contaminated soil was allegedly brought to the site by the owners of 525 East Main Street
(Shoreline Trailer Court Mobile Homes, LLC) EPA sent a Notice of Potential Liability and
Invitation to Perform of Finance Proposed Cleanup Activities, dated December 1 6, 2003, to
Shoreline Trailer Court Mobile Homes, LLC naming it and its members the PRPs A meeting was
held between DEP staff and the owners of Shoreline Trailer Court Homes, LLC on February 2,
2004 to discuss rernediation of the site under a consent order EPA’s Emergency Removal group
will base its decision to act upon the outcome of consent order negotiations
DEP is currently completing its Phase I/Il Environmental Site Assessment report for this site under
the pie-remedial cooperative agreement with EPA
MILFORD AREA-WIDE TCE CONTAMINATION, MILFORD
In August 2003, CT DEP was informed by a workers’ union that one of their workers had became
ill and that this worker’s doctor attributed the illness to occupational exposure to volatile organic
compounds The worker’s union believes that contamination on the Milford Power Co , LLC and
Jordan Realty, LLC sites on Shelland Street in Milford (near the intersection of Bic Drive arid
Oronoque Road) was the cause of this worker’s illness In 1 997, Beard Company transferred
property on Shelland Street in Milford to Jordan Realty, LLC In 1 999, Milford Power Co , LLC
acquired a portion of the former Beard Company property from Jordan Realty, LIC for the
construction of a natural gas fired power plant The DEP responded to the worker’s illness by
requesting additional environmental data from the Milford Power Co , LLC and sampling
residential and commercial drinking water wells in the area
Approximately sixty residential and commercial drinking water wells were sampled within a
one-mile radius of the Milford Power Co , LLC site for the presence of volatile organic
compounds The primary contaminant of concern on the Milford Power site in ground water is
trichloroethylene (TCE) TCE was detected in samples collected from two residential and one
commerciol drinking water wells above the CT Department of Public Health Drinking Water
Action Level of 5 ag/I TCE was also detected in an industrial supply well During the sampling
and until results were available, DEP provided bottled water to all properties with a well used for
drinking water supply The two residences with polluted wells were connected to public water
supply, which is available to the entire area
Based on ground water investigations conducted by environmental consultants for Milford Power,
only the commercial well is downgradient of their site, and the ICE release that was detected on
their site and Jordan Realty’s property There are several other potential sources of ICE pollution
in the area In particular, the residential properties with polluted wells are located very near Bic
Corporation (CIDOO1 1 66586) One of the properties is adiacent to the Bic Corporation
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 ,‘ 21
-------
Watch List
CONNECTICUT
property and the other is less thari 1 50 feet from Bic’s property Bic underwent an environmental
site assessment by an EPA contractor under CERCLA in 1 998
An investigation of DEP records revealed three sites in addition to the Milford Power and Jordan
Realty properties that may be a source of ICE polluted ground water in the area In August
2003, the DEP issued pollution abatement orders to Milford Power Co , LLC, Jordan Realty,
LLC, Bic Corporation and Northeast Electronic Corporation (CTD001 1 76486) In addition, the
DEP issued a pollution abatement order to Gas Equipment Engineering Corporation ri
October 2003 In December 2003, the DEP revoked the order to Northeast Electronics since
the site is required to investigate fully and remediate all pollution on their property, pursuant to
the corrective action provisions of 449(c)-i 05(h) RCSA All parties appealed the orders and
the DEP’s Office of Adiudications is hearing the appeals
The hearings for all four Orders have the following schedule Discovery Requests were filed on
February 6, 2004, the Pre hearing Exchange deadline is March 24, 2004 and the Preheorang
Conference is scheduled for April 27, 2004 Although appealed, the respondents are
performing some of the requirements in their respective orders at varying pace On March 5,
2004, the respondent’s attorneys and consultants discussed and reviewed with DEP staff and
our attorney aerial photographs of this area of Milford and discussed the feasibility of a
collective, area-wide investigation Also, DEP and our attorney have meet with the Beard
Company in Milford as part of our subpoena for information from the Beard Company on their
past use of the Jordan Realty and Milford Power properties
During drinking water well sampling, the DEF working with Gas Equipment Engineering
Corporation, sampled Gas Equipment former supply well, which was out of service This well
is located directly downgradient of the Milford Power property TCE was detected in this well at
1 20 cg/I Based on this result, the DEP become concerned that a residential condomi
nium property downgradient of Gas Equipment’s property may be at nsk from the volatilization of
TCE
In October 2003, the DEP installed thirteen(13) shallow ground water monitoring wells on the
Caswell Cove Condominium Association property (CT00009635 1 2) In addition, fourteen (14)
near-slab soil gas samples were collected adiacent to buildings on the Caswell Cove property
TCE was detected in the ground water and soil gas in excess of the DEP’s proposed standards
for ground water volatilization and soil vapor volatilization criteria near three of the eleven
buildings on the property In a report submitted to the Caswell Cove Condominium Association
Executive Board, the DEP proposed to install sub-slab depressunzation system below four buildings
on the Caswell Cove property The DEP was permitted to install these systems starting on
February 2, 2004 The DEP plans to have half of these systems operating by March 19, 2004
Also in October 2003, the DEP performed an investigation at the Housatonic Waste Water
Treatment Plant in Milford The purpose of the DEP’s investigation was to determine if workers
at this site ore at risk of exposure to TCE from volatilization of ground water TCE was detected
in ground water and soil gas above the DEP’s proposed standards for ground water volatiliza-
tion and soil vapor volatilization criteria In response, the DEP conducted a supplemental
investigation at this site in February 2004 The results of this investigation are similar to the
initial investigation The DEP has requested assistance from the CT Department of Public Health
DEP asked CT DPH to conduct a health risk determination, based on the results from our
investigations
22/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England I a EPAUuht States
Watch List Environmental Protection
Agency New England
SUPERFLUID ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 23
-------
Emergency Planning & Response Program
CONNECTICUT
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
RESPONSE PROGRAM
EPA New England’s Emergency Planning and Response
Program prepares for, and responds to oil and chemical spills
to the environment, and supports and supplements local, state,
and private parties’ efforts to address emergencies.
EPA also oversees short-term cleanups across New England. Short-term
cleanups, called “removal adions,” reduce immediate threats to public health and the environ-
ment at sites that are typically less complex to cleanup than sites on the National Priorities List.
Short-term cleanups may take anywhere from a few days to a few years to complete, depending
on the type and extent of contamination.
An emergency occurs when hazardous or toxic chemicals are released into the environment
causing potential health or environmental risks. EPA may need to respond within hours of the
event.
Time-Critical Adions are those cleanups where, based on an evaluatiOn of the site, EPA deter-
mines that on-site cleanup activities must be initiated within six months of determining that a
short-term cleanup is appropriate. For time-critical actions, EPA conducts an investigation of
the contamination and produces an “action memorandum” authorizing and outlining the cleanup
process before beginning work.
Examples of the types of situations where EPA may be asked to respond immediately include
those involving a fire, explosion or imminent, catastrophic contamination of a drinking water
reservoir. In cases where an abandoned property has been identified with drums of toxic
chemicals left behind, EPA may still assist in the cleanup but the timetable need not be as imme-
diate. The following charts show the funds spent at each of the sites EPA has worked on in 2003.
____
us
REGION 1
For further information on EPA
New England’s oil and chemi-
cal emergency response pro-
grams, visit our web site at
www.epo.gov/ne/superfund/er /
erindex.htm .
24 SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England I United States
IA Environmenta’ Protection
Emergency Planning & Response Program I Agency New England
SITES WITH SHORT-TERM CLEANUP ACTIVITIES COMPLETED IN 2003
Site Name City Date CERCLA
Completed Funds Expended
Connecticut
American Thread Company
Willimantic
05/01/03
$
1,625,868 13
Inter Royal Corporation
Plainfield
07/22/03
$
239,058 25
Beany’s Cleaners
Naugatuck
08/07/03
$
150,978.28
Chase Brass and Copper
Waterbury
08/10/03
$
3,772,999 1 4
Maine
Tuttle Estate
Lyman
09/16/03
$
87,51964
Buckfield Trailers
Buckfield
07/18/03
$
224,11302
Green Street Property
Houlton
10/24/03
$
21 6,558 08
One Market Square
Houlton
05/20/03
$
242,446 46
Winchendon
Foxboro
Mansfield
Taunton
Concord
Merrimac
10/09/03
08/08/03
10/17/03
05/27/03
04/30/03
08/24/03
$ 60,608 63
$1 ,024,900 84
$1,026,640 02
$1 ,353,466 33
$1,193,800 00
$ 528,782 27
Winchester
Providence
Bennington
Borre
Bellows Falls
12/12/03
06/30/03
04/30/03
09/11/03
12/09/03
$ 240,784 88
$ 543,715.79
$ 629,813 80
$ 225,397 22
$ 183,23961
Massachusetts
Sariborn Wood Factory
Evelyn Porter Estate
Hatheway & Patterson
Route 44
Nuclear Metals
Coastal Metal Finishing
New Hampshire
A C. Lawrence Leather
Rhode Island
T D Mack East
Vermont
Buckley Drive Waterline
Howe Cleaners
TLR Mill Complex
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 ,‘ 25
-------
Emergency Planning & Response Program
Bristol
Plo infield
Ploinfield
Waterbury
Bridgeport
Fitchburg
Boldwinville
Grafton
Worcester
Taunton
Salem
Wobu rn
Norwood
03/10/03
04/09/03
04/09/03
11/18/03
10/06/03
11/25/02
08/28/02
05/10/02
10/31/03
06/1 2/02
09/26/02
03/28/03
10/16/02
$ 77,591.52
$ 151,144 35
$ 104,556 32
$ 31,032.21
$ 406,894.13
$ 21,077 80
$1,704,926 53
$2,985,446 45
$ 2,297.62
$ 614,945 27
$1,977,199 05
$ 59,038.00
$ 272,053 42
New Hampshire
Spaulding Fibre
B & S Leasing
Eastern Parcel
Grugnale Waste Disposal
Troy Mills Landfill
Rhode Island
Centredale Manor
Restoration Proiect
20 Green Hill Road
Milton
Ploinfield
Henniker
Milford
Troy
10/08/03
10/31/01
1 0/31/01
11/11/03
10/03/02
$ 340,608 20
$ 425,835.99
$ 230,340 11
$ 431,642 79
$ 327,000.00
North Providence
10/22/03
$ 65,000 00
Johnston
02/25/03
$1,624,859 15
Vermont
Elizabeth Mine
Strafford 03/1 9/03
CONNECTICUT
SITES WITH ONGOING CLEANUP ACTIVITIES
Site Name City Date CERCIA
Started Funds Expended
Connecticut
Bristol Franklin Street PCBs
Brunswick Mill
Carvill Combing
EPAC
Chrome Engineering
Massachusetts
Sawyer Passway
Temple-Stuart
Fisherville Mill
Sutton Lone Plating
Oak Street
Witchcraft Heights
Wells G&H
Zimble Drum
$1,266,366 00
26/ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
-------
U.S. EPA New England United States
Environmental Protection
Brownfuelds Overview Agency New England
EPA NEW ENGLAND BROWNFIELDS:
RESTORING COMMUNITIES
Environmental contamination can rob a community of its
economic potential and its social structure even when
contamination is not severe enough for a Superfund
designation Any amount of contamination—or even the
perception of possible contamination—can prevent the use
of valuable property Across New England, hundreds of properties are abandoned or underused
because of the fear of environmental contamination, a contamination that may not even exist
And at the same time these sites are left unused, development is consuming valuable open
space elsewhere Although such idle properties, called brownfields, are usually urban
warehouses or abandoned factories, they can also be found in rural areas When mines are
abandoned or fields host illegal dumping, the value of the property can plummet
EPA New England’s Brownfields Program provides solutions by helping communities restore the value
to these abandoned sites The program focuses on praviding grants and services to help communities
assess contamination, plan for new uses, and clean sites to ready them for redevelopment
“The term ‘brownfield site’ means real property, the expansion, redevelopment,
or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence
of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant”
(from the federal Brown fields Act of 2002)
Summary of Brownfields Program
Originally begun as an EPA initiative in January 1995, the US EPA National Brownfields
Program has since evolved info a collaborative effort involving many federal, state and local
partners In January 2002, the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(“the Brownfields law”) was signed This law expanded potential federal assistance for Brownfields
revitalization, including grants for assessment, cleanup, and ob training The law also includes
provisions ta establish and enhance state and tribal response programs, which will continue to
play a critical role in the successful cleanup and revitalization of brownfields Belaw is a
summary of the US EPA Region 1 funding for each of the key Browrifields initiatives
Summary of Brownfields Funding in New England by State (1994-2003)
Program CT ME MA NH RI VT
Assessment Grants $5,265,000 $1,609,017 $11,733,131 $1,540,000 $1,103,000 $2,600,000
EPATBA $1,582,343 $362,181 $2,542,782 $242,533 $305,000 $250,000
Cleanup Grants $60,000 $0 $852,000 $0 $200,000 $0
Revalving Loan Fund $5,750,000 $2,650,000 $10,468,000 $2,450,000 $4,700,000 $1,000,000
JobTraining $1,000,000 $0 $1,550,000 $0 $200,000 $0
Showcase Communities $300,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $300,000 $0
Voluntary Cleanup Program $2,] 75,667 $750,892 $2,729,974 $1,908,369 $1,338,820 $307,030
State Site Assessments $714,960 $51 9,545 $781,000 $1,255,293 $598,] 15 $458,000
TOTAL $16,847,970 $5,891,635 $31,256,887 $7,369,195 $8,744,935 $4,615,030
I
L rxj & Communrty R vi liz iion
BROWN H ELPS
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORI 2003 ,‘ 27
-------
Brownfields Overview
CONNECTICUT
Brownfields Assessment
Program
The Brownfields Assessment Program
consists of grants of up to $400,000
initially to locai, tribal and state governmen-
tal entities to conduct site assessment and
related activities cit brownfields sites Funds
can be utilized to assess properties contami-
nated with petroleum Supplemental funds
are available in later years
Recipient Funding
Bridgeport
Bristol
Danbury
East Hampton
Haddam
Hartford
Middletown
Naugatuck Valley
Regional Planning Agency
New Britain
New Haven
New London
New Milford
Norwich
South Central Regional
Council of Governments
Stamford
Winsted/Wi nchester
TOTAL
$1,000,000
$200,000
$200,000
$175,000
$156,000
$550,000
$400,000
$417,000
$200,000
$267,000
$250,000
$350,000
$350,000
$200,000
$200,000
$350,000
$5,265,000
Targeted Brownfields
Assessments
Under this initiative, EPA uses its contrac-
tors to conduct brownfields assessments at
sites identified by the iocal entity as being a
high-priority for reuse Brownfields assess-
ments typically involve a review of existing
site records, site sampling and preparation
of a preliminary clean-up cost estimate
The information gathered allows local
government officials and developers to make
informed decisions regarding the redevel-
opment potential of a site
Site City Value
1 0 Reser,’e Road
Buckland Manufacturing
Cos Cob Power Station
O’Sullivans Island
Erickson Property
Field-Holstein Property
50 Miles Street
Gilbert & Bennett
H J Mills Box Factory
Hart Property
Hartford Car Wash
Hockonum Mill
International Silver- Factory
InterRoyal Mill
MAS Property/Citytrust Site
Occum Roto Print
Pacelli Trucking
Penn Central
Transportation Co
Portland Chemical Works
Rolfite Chemical
Roosevelt Mills
Samarius Property
Swan Engraving
US Cap Inc
TOTAL
Hartford
Manchester
Greenwich
Derby
Ledyard
Glastonbury
Bridgeport
Reddi ng
Bristol
Plymouth
Hartford
Vernon
H Meriden
Plainfield
Shelton
Norwich
Bridgeport
New London
Middletown
Shelton
Vernon
Shelton
Bridgeport
Prospect
$59,403
$26,408
$100,000
$96,981
$10,952
$84,905
$15,615
$100,000
$64,867
$75,000
$22,895
$96,196
$80,000
$116,397
$75,000
$84,903
$76,233
$51,692
$70,444
$61,815
$71,587
$13,602
$52,448
$75,000
$1,582,343
28/ SUPERFUND ANNUAl. REPORT 2003
-------
United States
U.S. EPA New England t
Brownfields Overview I PAEnir0menta1 Protection
Agency New England
Cleanup Grant Program
Underthis initiative, EPAfunds are awarded to eligible local, state, tnbal and non-profit entities
to condud cleanup activities on eligible brownfields properties Grants are for up to $200,000
per property Entities must own the property at the time of award to be eligible for funding.
Revolving Loan
Fund Pilots
Under this initiative, piiots are
awarded to eligible local,
tribal and state entities to
establish and capitalize revolv-
ing loan funds to assist
private and public entities in
cleaning up contaminated
sites Grants are for up to
$1,000,000 and eligible com-
munities may team together to
establish larger revolving loan
funds pools
City Funding
New Britain $60,000
Li L i i PP LiI Iiii
Recipient Funding
Berlin $500,000
Bridgeport $500,000
Hartford $500,000
Naugatuck Valley/Danbury $850,000
New Milford $1,000,000
Regional Growth Partnership $1,000,000
Stamford $750,000
Winchester $650,000
L jci LiiIi1 - ioo IiiIi
Brownfields Job Training Pilots
The Brownfields Jol Training Program funding is used to train workers in the field of hazardous
waste assessment and remediatiori lo be eligible for these pilots, the applicants must be
affiliated with an existing Brownfields-funded grant recipient
Organization/City Funding
Middlesex Community College
Stamford
The Workplace, Inc
$400,000
$200,000
$400,000
LJPT L
SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003 / 29
-------
Brownfields Overview
Showcase Communities
As port of the multi-federal agency Brownfields National Partnership, sixteen communities were
selected to receive Showcase Community designation following a notional competition
The federal partners work with selected communities to revitalize browrifields properties
EPA provided each with a $200,000 Brownfields Demonstration Pilot and assigned an EPA
employee to work full time in the designated community for two years
City Funding
Stamford
TOTAL
$300,000
$300,000 -
Financial Assistance to State Brownfields Programs
EPA also offers funding to diredly support state browrifields activities including funds to establish
and enhance state brownfields programs (also known as voluntary cleanup programs), to
conduct site specific assessment and cleanup, to develop revolving loan fund programs and to
develop insurance tools Below is a summary of the type and amount of funding received in
Connecticut
Program Funding
Voluntary Clean-up Program
Brownfuelds Site Assessment
and Cleanup:
$2,175,667
$714,960
Summary of EPA Brownfield Funding in Connecticut (1994-2003)
Program Funding
Assessment Pilots
Targeted Brownfields Assessment
Cleanup Grant Program
Revolving Loon Fund Pilots
Job Training Program
Showcase Communities
Voluntary Cleanup Program
State Brownfields Site Assessments
GRAND TOTAL
$5,265,000
$1,582,343
$60,000
$5,750,000
$1 ,000,000
$300,000
$2,1 75,667
$714,960
$16,847,970
CONNECTICUT
30,’ SUPERFUND ANNUAL REPORT 2003
------- |