1986 ANNUAL REPORT ON AIR QUALITY
                 IN NEW ENGLAND
                   July, 1987
                  Prepared by:

                 Norman Beloio
               Cheryl O'Halloran
                  Chris Diehl
                Sophie Ganshlrt
                   Alan Hicks
                    Allen 01
                Susaun Nachmann
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION I
        ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION

               60 Westview Street
        Lexington, Massachusetts  02173

-------
Table
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
1 1986 SUMMARY OF NEW ENGLAND NAMS/SLAMS
2 NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATiNG NATIONAL AiR QUALITY
S TAN [ )ARDS
3 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS THAT
EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
4 NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATING NAT [ ONAL AMBIENT AIR
QUALITY STANDARDS BY AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
5 STATIONS WHERE READINGS EXCEED EPISODE LEVELS
6 1986 PRECISION DATA FOR NEW ENGLAND ANNUAL AVERAGE
PROBABILITY LIMiTS IN PERCENT
7 1986 ACCURACY DATA FOR NEW ENGLAND ANNUAL AVERAGE
PROBABILITY LIMITS FOR THE LOWEST CONCENTP ATION,
FLOW RATE, AND ANALYSIS REPORTED IN PERCENT .
8 REGION I PERFORMANCE AUDIT PROGRAM — 1986
9 REGION I NONATTAINMENT AREAS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986
Page
4
5
8
67
71
76
77
79
80
10 REGION I ATTAIN NT AND UNCLASSIFIED AREAS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1986, WITH VIOLATIONS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS • 84
Page
INTRODUCTION
NATIONAL AI QUALITY STANDARDS 3
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USEI) TN TABLE 3 . . . b
1986 PRECISION AND ACCURACY DATA 75
REGION I 1986 PERFORMANCE AUI)IT PROGRAM • . • 78
AIR QUALITY SUMMARIES AND TRENDS 86
1986 CONNECTICUT AMBIENT AIR QUAL [ TY SUMMARY 87
1986 MAINE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY . . . • 90
1986 MASSACHUSETTS AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY . . . . . • . . . . . 92
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY . 95
1986 RHODE ISLAND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY 98
1986 VERMONT AMBIENT AiR QUALITY SUMMARY 101

-------
1986 ANNUAL REPORT ON AIR QUALITY
IN NEW ENGLAND
This report represents 1986 annual air quality information for all
states in New England. The majority of the data included in this report
were submitted to EPA by the states from their ambient monitoring networks
in accordance with 40 CFR 58 . The only data from industrial monitors
which have been included are from EPA—required networks in New Hampshire
and from Maine’s licensing program which supplements the state’s network.
This report is intended to list potential nonattainment areas for
planning purposes. The majority of data used has been evaluated arid
verified by EPA; however, for the areas listed as nonattainment, the data
may require further evaluation by both EPA and the states.
Table 1 is a summary of the status of the National Air Monitoring
Sites (MANS) and the State/Local Air Monitoring Sites (SLAMS) submitting
data to Region I. This table lists the number of sites operating, the
required number of sites, the number of sites reporting precision and
accuracy data, and the number of sites not meeting EPA minimum data
capture requirements.
Table 2 shows the number of stations violating the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the total number of stations reporting
data during 1986. There were no stations in violation of the SO 2 standards.
For particulates, one station was in violation of the 24 hour primary
standard, and fourteen stations were in violation of the 24 hour secondary
standard. The annual primary standard was violated at one station. Five
stations were in violation of the CO 8—hour primary standard, and no
stations were in violation of the 1—hour primary standard. For ozone,
there were sixteen stations in violation of the 1—hour primary standard.
No stations violated the NO 2 annual standard or the lead quarterly
standard.
Table 3 lists every state site in New England. The information
presented compares the measured values to each NAAQS. The information
included is the number of exceedences, the maximum and second high values,
and the annual means (geometric mean for TSP, arithmetic mean or average
for 502 and NO 2 ). Those stations reporting a maximum above the standard,
but a second high below the standard are included in this table. For

-------
intermittent data, an annual mean is not valid unless there are four
valid quarters. To be considered valid, a quarter must have at least
five values; and if any one month is missing, each of the other two months
must have two or more values. For continuous data, 75 percent of the
year must be available to calculate a valid annual average.
Table 4 shows the number of stations violating the NAAQS by Air
Quality Control Region (AQCR), as well as the total number of monitors in
each AQCR. A map delineating the AQCR5 in Region I is included at the
end of this table (Figure 1).
Table 5 has been developed to point out areas where air quality
levels have exceeded the emergency, warning, or alert episode levels. An
air pollution alert (warning or emergency) will be called when specified
pollutant concentrations are reached provided that meteorological condi-
tions are such that these levels can be expected to persist for 12 hours
or more. In the case of ozone, an alert (warning or emergency) will be
called if the situation is likely to reoccur within the next 24 hours.
Episode levels were reached or exceeded for TSP at two sites.
Tables 6 and 7 list the precision and accuracy data submitted by the
six New England states. The 95% probability limits for six criteria
pollutants are given as a network average for each state.
Table 8 lists the results from the Region I audit program for TSP,
SO2, CO, NO 2 , and 03. The results presented on a state—by—state has La
give the number of satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory audits.
Tables 9 and 10, respectively, list the nonattainnient areas in New
England with the last reported violation and the attainment and unclass-
ified areas in which there were recent violations to NAAQS.
Following Table 10 is a discussion of air quality trends in New
England for the criteria pollutants. This discussion includes several
charts of selected air quality montoring sites which show a linear regres-
sion of the deseasonalized monthly means for TSP, Pb, CO, SO 2 , and NO 2
during the last five years. For ozone, a chart of the number of days
exceeding the standard each year for the last five years is used.
2

-------
NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDSa
Pollutant Averaging Time Primary Standardsb Secondary StaridardsC Referene Methodsd
SO 2 Annual Arithmetic 80 u:,T/rn 3 Pararos ni1ine
Mean (0.03 ppm) Method
24 hours 365 ug/m 3 Pararos ritline
(0.14 ppm) Method
3 hours 1300 ug/m 3 Pararos iniline
(0.5 ppm) Method
TSP Annual Geometric 75 ug/m 3 60 ug/m 3 High Vo ume
Mean Samplin Method
24 hours 260 ug/m 3 150 ug/m 3 High Vo]ume
Sampling Method
pM 10 e Annual Arithmetic 50 ug/m 3 Same as Primary No Refeierice Method
Mean Standard Designated to Date
24 hours 150 ug/m 3 Same as Primary No Refeience Method
Standard Designated to Date
CO 8 hours 10 mg/rn 3 Same as Primary Non—Dis 1 ersive
(9 ppm) Standard Infrarec Spectroscopy
1 hour 40 mg/rn 3 Same as Primary Non—Dispersive
(35 ppm) Standard Infrarec Spectroscopy
03 1 hour 0.12 ppm Same as Primary Gas Pha e Chemi—
(235 ug/m 3 ) Standard lumtnes ent Method
NO 2 Annual Arithmetic 100 ug/m 3 Same as Primary Gas Pha e
Mean (0.05 ppm) Standard Chemilu ‘tnescence
Pb Calendar Quarter 1.5 ug/m 3 Same as Primary High Vo ume Sampling
Arithmetic Mean Standard Method
aNation standards other than those based on annual arithmetic means or annual gometric means
are not to be exceeded more than once per year.
bNational Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of
safety, to protect the public health.
CNational Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect th public
welfare from any know-n or anticIpated adverse effects of a pollutant.
dReference method as described by the EPA.
eReplaces TSP as the indicator for particulate matter for the ambient standards elfective
July 31, 1987, and includes only those particles with an aerodynamic diameter le s than or
equal to a nominal 10 microns.
3

-------
TABLE 1
1986 SUMMARY OF NLW ENGLAND
NP.YIS/SLAMS
(l)
(2)
( ) x/y:
— National Air Monitorir Sites
— State/Local Air Monitorir Sites
x is the number of sites operatir ;
y is the total number of sites required to be operated.
( 4 Adjusted for seasonal Ironitoring and site start—ups and terminations
NAMS (1)
SLAMS ( 2)
State
Cr
ME
MA
NH
RI
Totals
Nuirtbe r
operating 3
32/32
3/3
41/41
3/3
14/14
2/2
95,/95
NAMS/SLAMS
Number Not Meetir
EPA’S Minimum Data
Capture Requirenents ( 4
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Percent of Required
Precision
Data
Accuracy
Data
Number
Operating
70/70
16/16
13/15
32/32
10/10
11/11
152/154
Number Not Meetiri
EPA’s Minimum Data
Capture Reguireirent
0
1
1
2
0
1
5
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

-------
TABLE 2
NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATING
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
Standard CT ME MA Nil RI VT
22
Annual Primary 80 ug/m 3 0/19 0/25 0/17 0117 013 013
24—hour Primary* 365 ug/m 3 0/19 0/25 0/17 0/17 0/3 0/3
3—hour Secondary* 1300 ug/m 3 0/19 0/25 0/17 0/17 0/3 0/3
Particu].ates
Annual Primary 75 ug/m 3 0/53 0/55 1/23 0/27 0/12 0/6
24—hour Primary* 260 ug/m 3 0/53 1/55 0/23 0/27 0/12 0/6
24—hour Secondary* 150 ug/m 3 0/53 8/55 3/23 3/27 0/12 0/6
CO
8—hour Primary* 10 ug/tn 3 1/6 0/1 2/8 2/2 0/2 0/1
1—hour Primary* 40 ug/m 3 0/6 0/1 0/8 0/2 0/2 0/1
9-3
1—hour Primary* 0.12 ppm 7/10 1/9 5/11 1/5 2/2 0/2
Annual Primary 100 ug/m 3 0/3 0/8 0/1 0/1 0/1
Pb
Quarterly Mean 1.5 ug/m 3 0/54 0/4 0/6 0/8 0/5
*Unless the second highest average exceeds the NAAQS, there is no violation.
x/y — x is the number of stations in violation.
y is the total number of stations.
This pollutant is not monitored in the state.
5

-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USED IN TABLE 3
Site identification number
Number of observations
Highest 24—hour value recorded in the yea c
Second highest 24—hour value recorded in the year
Number of 24—hour values greater than 260 ug/m 3 for TSP
Number of 24—hour values greater than 150 ug/1n 3 for TSP
Arithmetic mean
Geometric mean
Geometric standard deviation
Fir8t quarter arithmetic mean
Second quarter arithmetic mean
Third quarter arithm tic mean
Fourth quarter arithmetic mean
Number of quarterly means greater than 1.5 ug/1n 3 for lead
Highest 24—hour value recorded for the year except
Connecticut and New Hampshir which are monthly values
Second highest 24—hour value recorded for the year except
Connecticut and New Hamp8hire wh ch are monthly values
Met hod
Highest 1—hour value recorded in the year
Second 1—hour highest value recorded in the year
Number of observations greater than 40 mg/rn 3 for CO
Highest 8—hour value recorded in the year
Second 8—hour highest value recorded in the year
Number of 8—hour averages greater than 10 mg/rn 3 for CO
Number of 24—hour averages greater than 365 ug/m 3 for SO 2
Highest 3—hour value recorded in the year
Second highest 3—hour value recorded in the
Number of 3—hour averages greater than 1300
The valid number of days measured
The valid number of days in the ozone season
Maximum hourly ozone value for the highest day
Maximum hourly ozone value for the second highest day
Maximum hourly ozone value for the third highest day
Site t.D.
#Obs
Max 24—hr 1st
Max 24—hr 2nd
Obs > 260
Obs > 150
Ant Mean
Geo Mean
GSD
Qtrly Arith Mean 1st
Qtrly Arith Mean 2nd
Qtrly Arith Mean 3rd
Qtrly Arith Mean 4th
Means > 1.5
Max Values 1st
Max Values 2nd
Meth, Me
Max 1—hr let
Max 1—hr 2nd
Obs > 40
Max 8—hr let
Max 8—hr 2nd
Obs ) 10
Obs > 365
Max 3—hr let
Max 3—hr 2nd
Obs > 1300
Valid U Meas
Valid U Req
Daily Max 1—hr let
Daily Max 1—hr 2nd
Daily Max 1—hr 3rd
year
ug/m 3 for SO 2
6

-------
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USED IN TABLE 3 (Continued)
Vals > .125 Meas Number of measured daily maximum greater than or equal
to 0.125 ppm for 03
Vals > .125 Eat Number of expected violations for 03
Miss Days Assm < Std Number of missing days assumed to be less than the
a tandard
7

-------
TABLE 3
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/ni 3 )
Method: Graviinetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs) Obs> Ant Ceo
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
07 0008 004 FOl Ansonia New Haven Division Street and Hershey 59 101 93 42 37 1.6
Drive
07 0060 001 FO1 Bridgeport Fairfield City Hall, 47 Lyon Terrace 61 114 104 44 40 1.5
07 0060 009 FOl Bridgeport Fairfield Bassick High School 59 114 94 42 37 1.6
07 0060 009 F09 Bridgeport Fairfield Bassick High School 53 117 99 43 38 1.6
07 0060 010 F05 Bridgeport Fairfield Prospect Street and Park 60 117 105 48 44 1.6
Street
07 0060 123 P01 Bridgeport Fairfield Trailer, Hallet Street and 59 112 112 54 49 1.5
Barnum Avenue
07 0060 123 P09 Bridgeport Fairfield Trailer, Hallet Street and 15 86 85 48? 44? 1.6
Barnum Avenue
07 0070 001 FOl Bristol Hartford City Hall, Main Street 58 101 99 44 39 1.7
07 0085 001 F03 Burlington Hartford Fish Hatchery, Punch Brook 58 80 61 22 18 1.3
Road
07 0175 002 FOl Danbury Fairfield Public Library, 170 Main 57 132 101 48 43 1.6
Street
07 0175 123 FOl Danbury Fairfield Trailer, Connecticut State 60 108 105 48 43 1.7
College
07 0220 004 FOl East Hartford Hertford City Hall, 740 Main Street 60 102 91 45 41 1.6
07 0330 008 FOl Greenwich Fairfield Cos Cob Pumping Station, 59 102 82 40 37 1.5
River Road
07 0350 006 FOl Groton New London Highway Garage 61 103 84 36 32 1.5
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—91
Site I.D .
07 0700 002 FOl
07 0700 013 FOl
Hart ford
Lit chfi el d
County
Manchester
Meriden
Criminal Justice Academy
Library, Main Street
Library, Main Street
401 Flatbush Avenue
Fire Station, 510 Franklin
Avenue
Helco, 400 Sheldon Street
Morris Dam, Route 109,
Morris
Town Hall, 41 Center Street
Stoddard Building, 165 Miller
Street
City Hall, Dekoven Drive
Devon Community Center,
Naugatuck Avenue
Town Hall, 229 Church Street
Fire Station, South Main
Street
Fire Station, Beaver Street
Chamberlain School, Newiag on
Road
Clinton School, Clinton Avenue
Fire Station, Grand Avenue
60 188 148
61 94 67
60 101 81
60 144 115
56 110 105
58 115 101
59 113 91
61 93 86
60 100 95
59 93 83
51 145
52 111
67 61 1.5
26 22 1.9
40 36 1.6
51 45 1.7
49 44 1.6
45 41 1.5
49 44 1.6
40 36 1.6
40 36 1.6
37 34 1.6
47 42 1.7
47 43 1.6
Location County
07 0380
07 0420
07 0420
07 0420
07 0420
002
003
003
013
014
FO 5
FO 1
F09
FO 1
FO 1
Address
Haddam
Hart ford
Hart ford
Hart ford
Hartford
Max 24—hr
#Obs 1st 2nd
Obs>
260
Obs>
150
61 119
57 107
60 108
60 100
61 99
60
105
106
97
93
07 0420 015 F05
07 0478 001 F03
07 0510 001 FOl
07 0540 002 FOl
07 0570 003 P01
07 0590 002 FOl
07 0660 001 FOl
07 0680 007 FOl
07 0680 008 FOl
07 0680 009 P01
Ant Ceo
Mean Mean GSD
28 25 1.6
55 50 1.5
55 50 1.6
49 45 1.6
46 42 1.5
Middlesex
Hart ford
Hartford
Hart ford
Hartford
Hartford
Litchfield
Hart ford
New Haven
Middlesex
New Haven
New Haven
Hart ford
Hartford
Hart ford
New Haven
New Haven
Middletown
Milford
Naugatuck
New Britain
New Britain
New Britain
New Haven
New Haven
90
111

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 Q)NNECTICUT — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—91
Site [ .D .
Location County
Address
Max 24—hr Obs>
#Obs 1st 2nd 260
Obs> Ant Ceo
150 Mean Mean
CSD
the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.
56
55
58
57
07
0700
018
FO1*
New Haven
New Haven
Stiles Street
162
685
449 16
69 152
131
1.8
07
0820
001
FOl
Norwalk
Fairfield
Board of Education, 105 Main
60
112
108
42
38
1.6
Street
07
0820
005
FOl
Norwalk
Fairfield
Health Department, 137 East
Avenue
53
134
109
57
51
1.6
07
0820
012
FOl
Norwalk
Fairfield
Post Office, Washington Street
44
39
1.6
07
0840
002
FOl
Norwich
New London
22 Court House Square
47
42
1.6
07
07
1080
1080
001
007
FOl
FOl
Stamford
Stamford
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fire Station, 653 Main Street
Department of Public Works,
Magee Avenue
53
50
49
46
1.5
1.5
07
1080
021
FOl
Stamford
Fairfield
Community Center, Henry Street
56
121
109
48
44
1.5
07
1110
005
FOl
Stratford
Fairfield
Health and Welfare Building,
Main Street
59
147
143
49
44
1.6
07
1160
001
FOl
Torrington
Litchfield
140 Main Street
60
132
94
43
37
1.8
07
1205
001
F03
Voluntown
New London
Pachaug State Forest
60
112
76
24
21
1.7
07
1210
001
FOI
Wallingford
New Haven
Town Hall, 350 Center Street
60
144
125
49
41
1.9
07
1240
005
FOl
Waterbury
New Haven
Court House, Grand Street
61
127
110
50
43
1.7
07
1240
005
P09
Waterbury
New Haven
Court House, Grand Street
52
112
100
47
42
1.7
07
1240
006
FOl
Waterbury
New Raven
Fire Station, Willow Street
57
101
91
37
33
1.7
07
1240
007
P01
Waterbury
New Haven
Fire Station, East Main Street
60
141
129
58
50
1.7
128
140
102
114
118
87
101
109
? Indicates that
* Site was established for PM 10 . It does not meet siting criteria for TSP.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (uglm 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Ill—volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs) Ant Geo
Site I.D. Location County Address 1 /Cbs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
07 1240 007 F09 Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, East Main Street 15 135 114 65? 56? 1.8
07 1240 123 F05* Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, East Main Street 59 205 158 2 69 69 1.7
07 1240 123 F09* Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, East Main Street 10 164 137 1 84? 74? 1.7
07 1260 001 F05 Waterford New London New London Country Club, 55 98 89 32 29 1.7
Country Club Road
07 1340 003 F05 West Maven New Haven Interstate 95 Toll Booth 55 172 150 1 66 58 1.6
07 1410 002 FOl Willimautic Wiodhain Court House, 108 Valley Street 57 108 105 45 39 1.7
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.
* Site was established for P 1j 0 . It does not meet siting criteria for TSP.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITh AN
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — Hi—volume SA32IA,
53 — Hi—volume GMW 9000, 54 — Hi—volume W10
Max. 24—br obs> Arith
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obp 1st 2nd 150 Mean Method
07 0060 010 P01 Bridgeport Fairfield 680 Park Avenue 59 89 82 33 52
07 0420 015 P01 Hartford Hartford 400 Sheldon Street 59 80 75 37 52
07 0700 018 FOl New Haven New Haven Stiles Street 163 127 127 57 52
I-a
07 1240 123 P01 Waterbury New Haven Trailer, Entrance to 184 56 95 84 40 52
07 1340 003 FDA West Haven New Haven 195 Toll Booth 57 89 78 38 52

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED 1&TIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hi Volume, Atomic Absorption—92; Lo Volume, Atomic Absorptiorr-94
Site I.D .
07 0008 004 F01
Location County Address
07 0060
07 0060
07 0060
07 0060
07 0060
07 0060
001
009
009
010
010
123
FO 1
FO 1
P09
FO 1
P01
FO 1
( JObs 1st
Qtrly Arith Mean
2nd 3rd
59 .06 .06 .05 .10
Means
4th > 1.5
Max
1st
Values
2nd Meth
New Haven
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fairfield
Fairfield
Hart ford
Hartford
Fairfield
Fairfield
Division Street and
Hershey Avenue
City Hall, 47 Lyon Terrace
Bassick High School
Bassick High School
680 Park Avenue
680 Park Avenue
Trailer, Hallet Street
and Barnum Avenue
Trailer, Hallet Street
and Barnum Avenue
City Hall, Main Street
Fish Hatchery,
Punch Brook Road
Public Library,
170 Main Street
.09 92
.09
.06
.07
.12
.13
.11
57 .11
59 .10
51 .09
60 .11
12 .10
59 .12
15
.06
.06
.06
.09
.10
.09
Ansonia
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bristol
Burlington
Danbury
Danbury
East
Hartford
Cr e enwi ch
Croton
Had dam
Hartford
Hartford
07 0060 123 F09
07 0070 001 FOl
07 0085 001 F03
07 0175 002 FOl
07 0175 123 P01
07 0220 004 FOl
07 0330 008 P01
.09
.07
.07
.11
.11
.13
.15
.15
.15
.12
.14
.15
.14
.11
.10
.08
.14
.15
• 14
92
92
92
92
94
92
07 0350
07 0380
07 0420
07 0420
.12
58 .08 .06 .05 .08
58 .02 .02 .02 .03
57 .08 .06 .07 .07
60 .07 .06 .05 .09
60 .08 .07 .08 .10
59 .05 .04 .05 .10
006
002
003
003
FO I
P05
FO 5
F09
Trailer,
Connecticut State College
Hartford City Hall,
740 Main Street
Fairfield Cos Cob Pumping Station,
River Road
New London Highway Garage
Middlesex Criminal Justice Academy
Hartford Library, Main Street
Hartford Library, Main Street
.13 .13 92
.12 .11 92
.03 .03 92
.10 .09 92
.10 .09 92
.12 .11 92
.15 .09 92
61
.04
.03
.02
.04
.04
.04
92
61
.03
.03
.02
.03
.04
.04
92
57
.08
.09
.10
.09
.12
.11
92
57
.08
.08
.09
.09
.10
.10
92

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hi Volume, Atomic Absorption—92; Lo Volume, Atomic Absorption—94
Site ID .
07 0420 013 FOl
07 0420 014 FOl
Location County
Hartford
Hart ford
Hart ford
Hartford
Hart ford
Hartford
Li tch field
County
Manchester
Mansfield Tolland
Town Hall,
41 Center Street
Agriculture Engineering
Building, University
of Connecticut
Stoddard Building,
165 Miller Street
City Hall, Devoken Drive
Devon Community Center,
Naugatuck Avenue
Town Hall,
229 Church Street
Fire Station,
South Main Street
Fire Station,
Beaver Street
60 .09 .09 .08 .10
61 .08 .07 .07 .11
60 .15 .07 .10 .12
.09 .08 .07 .09
.10 .06 .06 .08
59 .10 .09 .11 .16
61 .06 .06 .06 .08
60 .08 .06 .06 .10
.15 .13 92
.13 .11 92
.30 .15 92
.10 .10 92
.13 .10 92
.20 .15 92
.09 .09 92
.13 .11 92
07 0420
07 0420
07 0420
07 0420
07 0478
015
015
016
016
001
FO 1
F05
PD’
F09
FO 3
Qtrly Arith Mean
I0bs 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
_______ Address
Hartford 401 Flatbush Avenue
Hartford Fire Station,
510 Franklin Street
Hartford 400 Sheldon Street
Hartford 400 Sheldon Street -
Hartford 151 Farmington Avenue
Hartford 151 Farmington Avenue
Litchfield Morris Dam, Route 109,
Morris
Hartford
Means Max Values
> 1.5 1st 2nd Meth
07 0510 001 FOl
07 0520 001 FOl
07 0540 002 FOl
07 0570 003 FOl
07 0590 002 FOl
07 0660 001 FOl
07 0680 007 FOl
8
.12
.14
.13
.14
.15
.15
94
61
.17
.12
.12
.13
.20
.15
92
12
.11
.15
.17
.16
.19
.18
94
12
.11
.15
.17
.14
.20
.18
94
61
.01
.02
.02
.02
.04
.02
92
Meriden New Haven
Middletown
Milford
59 .05 .05 .06 .08
10 .03 .02 .03 .03
Middlesex
New Haven
Naugatuck New Haven
New Britain Hartford
.12 .07 92
.04 .03 94
55
58
07 0680 008 FOl New Britain Hartford

-------
TABLE lfr (Continued)
E,NBIENT AIR QUALITY INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NNECTICUT — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hi Volume, Atomic Absorption—92; Lo Volume, Atomic Absorption—94
Site I.D.
Location
County
Address # Obs
Qtrly Arith Mean
Means
) 1.5
Max
1st
Values
2nd
Meth
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
07 0680 009 FOl
New Britain
Hartford
Chamberlain School,
NewirLgton Road
58
.05
.04
.05
.08
.10
.08
92
—.
07 0700 002 FOl
New Haven
New Haven
Clinton School,
51
.10
.11
.09
.11
.15
.14
92
LI
Clinton Avenue
07 0700 013 FOl
New Haven
New Haven
Fire Station,
Grand Avenue
52
.20
.08
.06
.09
.42
.12
92
07 0700 018 FOl
New Haven
New Haven
Stiles Street
54
.23
.22
.20
.23
.28
.25
92
07 0700 018 FOl
New Haven
New Haven
Stiles Street
12
.24
.21
.20
.19
.25
.24
94
07 0700 018 F09
New Haven
New Haven
Stiles Street
55
.24
.22
.20
.22
.28
.25
92
07 0820 001 P01
Norwalk
Fairfield
Board of Education,
Main Street
60
.08
.06
.04
.07
.12
.09
92
07 0820 005 FOl
Norwalk
Fairfield
Health Department,
137 East Avenue
58
.10
.08
.06
.11
.13
.13
92
07 0820 012 FOl
Norwalk
Fairfield
Post Office,
Washington Street
56
.10
.08
.06
.08
.14
.12
92
07 0840 002 FOl
Norwich
New London
22 Court House Square
56
.06
.09
.21
.06
.41
.18
92
07 0900 002 FOl
Putnam
Wiadham
Superior Court,
155 Church Street
11
.05
.03
.03
.03
.06
.04
94
07 1080 001 FOl
Stamford
Fairfield
Fire Station,
653 Main Street
58
.06
.09
.07
.07
.11
.11
92
07 1080 007 FOl
Stamford
Fairfield
Department of Public
Works, Magee Avenue
58
.10
.11
.08
.12
.14
.13
92
07 1080 021 FOl
Stamford
Fairfield
Community Center,
Henry Street
56
.12
.07
.07
.07
.16
.12
92
07 1080 022 FOl
Stamford
Fairfield
389 Washington Boulevard
11
.13
.14
.13
.09
.17
.15
94

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 Q NNE ICUT — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hi Volume, Atomic Absorption—92; Lo Volume, Atomic Absorption—94
Qtrly Arith Mean Means Max Values
Site I.D. Location County Address I! Obs 1st 2nd 3rd 4th > 1.5 1st 2nd Meth
07 1110 005 FOl Stratford Fairfield Health and Welfare 60 .16 .08 .07 .16 .24 .18 92
Building, Main Street
07 1160 001 FOl Torririgtoa Litchfield 140 Main Street 60 .08 .05 .07 .10 .16 .10 92
07 1205 001 F03 Voluntown New London Pachaug State Forest 60 .01 .01 .03 .02 .07 .03 92
07 1210 001 P01 Wallingford New Haven Town Hall, 60 .07 .06 .07 .10 .13 .09 92
350 Center Street
07 1240 005 FOl Waterbury New Haven Court House, Grand Street 61 .11 .09 .08 .13 .17 .15 92
07 1240 005 F09 Waterbury New Haven Court House, Grand Street 55 .10 .07 .08 .10 .15 .10 92
07 1240 006 FOl Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, 57 .05 .05 .06 .07 .10 .07 92
Willow Street
07 1240 007 FOl Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, 60 .15 .11 .10 .16 .19 .18 92
East Main Street
07 1240 007 F09 Waterbury New Haven Fire Station, 14 .17 .20 .17 92
East Main Street
07 1240 123 FOl Waterbury New Haven Trakler, Entrance to 184 60 .17 .12 .14 .18 .23 .23 92
07 1240 123 F09 Waterbury New Haven Trailer, Entrance to 184 60 .13 .13 .14 .18 .22 .17 92
07 1260 001 P05 Waterford New London New London Country Club, 55 .02 .03 .05 .04 .10 .05 92
Country Club Road
07 1340 003 FOl West Haven New Haven 195 Toll. Booth 57 .14 .12 .10 .16 .17 .15 92
07 1340 003 FOl West Haven New H v o 195 Tr 1 booth 9 .15 .10 .12 .08 .18 .15 94
07 1410 002 FOl Willimantic Wiudham Court House, 57 .06 .04 .06 .22 .44 .13 92
108 Valley Street

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuous—il
Max 1—hr Obs Max 8—hr Obs
Site I.D. Location County Address / /Obs 1st 2nd >40 1st 2nd >10
07 0060 004 FOl Bridgeport Fairfield Jasper McLevy Hall, State Street 8621 13.2 12.7 9.1 8.9
07 0420 017 FOl Hartford Hartford 221 Asylum Avenue 7933 21.9 18.7 12.7 12.5 6
07 0680 002 FOl New Britain Hartford City Hall, 27 West Main Street 7012 15.4 13.2 8.2 7.7
07 0700 007 FOl New Haven New Haven City Hall, 161 Church Street 1722 12.5 12.1 6.8 6.8
07 0700 019 FOl New Haven New Haven U. 1. Office, 80 Temple Street 6027 13.7 13.3 9.1 8.1
07 1080 020 FO1 Stamford Fairfield Ferguson Library, 96 Broad 8681 18.9 17.9 12.5 8.9
Street

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20
Max
24—hr
#Obs 1st 2nd
Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean
07
0175
123
FOl
07
0220
005
FOl
07
0225
003
FOl
07
07
07
07
0250
0330
0350
0420
005
017
007
123
F03
F03
FOl
FOl
07
0590
002
FOl
07
0680
011
FOl
07
0700
017
FOl
07
0700
123
FOl
Site I.D.
Location
County
Address
07 0060 012 FOl
Bridgeport
Fairfield
Edison School,
115 Boston Terrace
8208
143
132
217
215
403
351
32
07 0060 123 FOl
Bridgeport
Danbury
East Hartford
East Haven
Enfield
Greenwich
Groton
Hartford
Milford
New Britain
New Haven
New Haven
Fairfield
Fairfield
Hartford
New Haven
Hartford
Fairfield
New London
Hartford
New Haven
Hartford
New Haven
New Haven
Trailer,
Hallet Street and
Barnum Avenue
Trailer, Connecticut
State College
Fire Station,
300 Main Street
Animal Shelter,
Commerce Street
Shaker Road
Greenwich Point Park
Fire Headquarters
Trailer, West Street
and Capitol Avenue
Devon Community
Center, Naugatuck
Avenue
National Guard
Aruxry, Main Street
Fire Station,
Lombard Street
Trailer,
8263
8281
7535
8146
7894
8007
8061
7984
8312
8256
8156
8092
134
94
98
124
95
77
78
173
251
147
177
301
112
84
93
106
67
73
77
116
233
121
160
163
353
126
137
255
154
120
126
275
493
244
256
641
260
117
129
224
136
109
121
222
490
182
252
514
474
162
168
278
165
149
215
288
668
259
338
676
414
147
162
267
157
144
186
283
663
246
293
663
30
20
22
22
16
14
21
35
34
26
36
39

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NkTIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean
07 0820 013 FOl Norwalk Fairfield Ludlow School, 8088 143 122 223 217 249 231 23
Rogers Street
07 0890 002 FOl Preston New London Norwich Hospital, 1917 71 58 112 90 121 118 19?
Route 12
07 1080 025 F01 Stamford Fairfield Recreation Department, 8141 162 141 236 232 291 275 29
Cortland Avenue
07 1080 123 FOl Stamford Fairfield Trailer, North Street 8231 136 132 190 183 215 204 28
07 1240 008 FOl Waterbury New Haven U. S. A. R. Center, 2904 100 97 184 169 204 197 34?
Lydia Street
Extension
07 1240 123 FOl Waterbury New Haven Entrance to 184 8260 133 102 242 209 270 252 22
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
ANBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — NITROGEN DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Chemilumineseence—14
Max 1—hr Max 24—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address //Ohs 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Mean(’)
07 0060 123 FO1 Bridgeport Fairfield Trailer, Hallet Street 8575 180 179 50
07 0220 003 FO1 East Hartford Hartford 30 Remington Road 8274 231 194 41
07 0700 123 FOl New Haven New Haven Trailer, 715 State Street 8054 600 203 54
p . ,)
0
( )me primary standard for nitrogen dioxide is 100 ug/m 3 , annual arithmetic mean.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 CONNECTICUT — OZONE* (ppm)
Method: Hourly Values, Ultra Violet Dasibi Corporation—14
Valid Daily Max 1—hr Vals>.12 5 Miss Days
Site I.D. Location County Address I/Meas I/Req 1st 2nd 3rd Meas Est Assm
-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Graviii tric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs> Ant Gec
Site I.D. Location County Address ( lObs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
20 0010 003 F05 Acadia National Hancock Ranger Headquarters, 110 72 39 14 12 2.0
Park McFarland Hill
20 0060 008 P01 Auburn Androscoggin LePage Bakery, 77 161 156 3 56 46 1.9
60 Second Street
20 0080 005 FOl Augusta Kennebec Fire Station, Hartford 168 183 139 1 49 41 1.8
Square
20 0100 001 FOl Bangor Penobscot 31 Central Street 68 179 148 1 50 42 1.8
20 0100 002 FOl Bangor Penobscot Pump Station, 105 235 231 6 69 59 1.7
Washington Street
20 0150 001 F02 Berwick York School Street 89 162 136 1 60? 52? 1.7
20 0160 002 P01 Biddeford York Wastewater Treatment 117 110 109 43 39 1.6
Plant, Water Street
20 0180 002 FOl Brewer Penobscot Brewer Junior High 69 127 101 42 36 1.7
School, Son rset Street
20 0190 002 F05 Bridgton Cumberland Upper Ridge Road, 102 53 44 16 14 1.8
Route 2
20 0205 003 J02 Bucksport Hancock Bucks Mill Road 255 58 53 17? 15? 1.7
20 0205 004 J02 Bucksport Hancock Public Landing 260 133 111 31? 26? 1.8
20 0315 002 J02 East Penobscot Katahdin School, 117 107 83 28 24 1.8
Millinocket Birch Street
20 0380 001 F05 Farmiogton Franklin Fairgrounds 24 81 81 40? 34? 1.8
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs> Ant Geo
Site I.D. Location County Address 1/Obs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
20 0400 001 J05 Fort Aroostook Fairfield Energy Venture, 43 91 88 40? 37? 1.6
Fairfield 264 Main Street
20 0530 001 J02 Jay Franklin International Paper Company, 353 126 116 39 33 1.8
Lagoon Hill
20 0530 003 J02 Jay Franklin Jewell Property, Crash Road 355 106 105 23 19 1.9
20 0530 004 J02 Jay Franklin Bomaster Property, Jay Hill 351 119 84 29 25 1.8
20 0530 008 J02 Jay Franklin International. Paper Comapny, 349 131 117 40 34 1.8
Burnam Site
20 0580 001 F02 Kittery York Greenfield Street 53 98 67 30? 27? 1.7
20 0580 002 F02 Kittery York Government Street 41 99 85 37? 34? 1.5
20 0640 002 J02 Lincoln Penobscot Vocational Education 362 145 121 35 30 1.7
Building, West Broadway
20 0640 003 J02 Lincoln Penobscot Post Office, 50 Fleming 353 163 120 1 39 34 1.7
Street
20 0640 007 J02 Lincoln Penobscot Thomas Motel Trailer Park, 357 142 133 41 35 1.8
Broadway
20 0720 011 F02 Madawaska Aroostook St. Jarre’s, 11th Avenue 110 190 158 3 52 45 1.7
20 0760 003 J02 Mexico Oxford Wastewater Treatment Plant 218 134 126 41 37 1.6
20 0760 008 J02 Mexico Oxford Labonvilles, Route 2 215 137 134 54 47? 1.8
20 0760 010 J02 Mexico Oxford Carver’s Residence, 219 124 99 38 34 1.7
crr et
20 0780 009 J05 Millinocket Penobscot York Street 191 160 137 1 43 37 1.7
? Indicates that the mean F’ ’ not satIsfy sunrn r; criterIa.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—9l
Site I.D .
20 0840 003 FOl
20 0840 005 F05
20 0885 004 J05
20 0885 007 F05
t’. 20 0885 008 F05
20 0907 005 F05
20 0907 007 J05
20 0960 014 FOl
20 0980 005 FOl
Location County
Old Town Penobscot
Old Town Penobscot
Oxford County Oxford
Oxford County Oxford
Oxford County
Penobscot
County
Penobscot
County
Port land
Presque Isle
Address ____
Marsh Island Apartments,
South Main Street
Penobscot Shoe Company,
450 North Main Street
Reilly Property, Gary Street 59
South Paris
South Paris Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Wilner Company
Newburgh Consolidated
School, Newburgh
Shumway Field, Route 178,
Milford
Oxford and Elm Streets
Northeastland Hotel,
436 Main Street
Taylor Mountain
Taylor Mountain
Village Green, Route 108
Village Green, Route 108
Hinkley Farm School
213 213
60 79 56
336 93 91
117 148 127
182 469 276
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs> Ant Ceo
#Obs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
20 1020
20 1020
20 1020
20 1020
20 1100
Oxford
Penobscot
Penobscot
Cumberland
Aroos took
Oxford
Oxford
Oxford
Oxford
Some r set
005
006
007
007
001
J02
JO 2
FO 2
J02
JO 2
Rumford
Rumford
Rumford
Rumford
Skowhe gan
69
123
115
38
31
1.9
4
87?
78?
1.6
140
75
74
29?
26?
1.6
25?
20
21?
17
1.7
1.7
348
98
96
29
25
1.8
2
10
54
64
50
52
1.5
1.9
220
223
118
95
126
95
111
103
93
66
90
88
37
27
35
34
33
24
30
28
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/ni 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample —91
1st
2nd 260
150 Mean
Mean
69
57
20
17
141
98
Site I.D.
Location
County
Address
#Obs
GSD
20
1100 002 J02
Skowbegan
Somerset
Scott Paper Company,
110
1.8
Eaton Ridge
20
1140 002 FOl
South Portland
Cumberland
Southern Maine Vocational
Technical Institute,
Hildreth Hall, Ford Road
110
1.6
20
1150 001 J05
Thomaston
Knox
Mitchell Property,
2 Dexter Avenue
208
149
127
27
22
1.9
20
1150 003 J05
Thomaston
Knox
Saunders Property,
Old Country Road
202
118
83
26
22
1.8
20
1150 004 J05
Thoinaston
Knox
Pease Property,
204
104
81
32
28
1.7
Ui
20
1150 007 J05
Thomaston
Knox
Buttermilk Lane
Marsh Road
201
135
133
27
24
1.7
20
1205 007 J02
Washington
County
Washington
Georgia Pacific
Corporation, Woodland
251
222
124
1
32?
25?
2.0
20
1205 008 J02
Washington
County
Washington
Woodland High School,
Woodland
231
260
176
4
37?
27?
2.1
20
1205 018 F03
Washington
County
Washington
Background
63
42
41
14
12
1.8
20
1220 003 FOl
Waterville
Kennebec
Stern’s Department Store,
Main Street
75
137
126
50
42
1.8
20
1260 002 J05
Westbrook
Cumberland
N.E.T.&T. Company,
Ash Street
120
122
109
45
39
1.7
20
1260 008 J02
Westbrook
Cumberland
Research Building,
Warren Avenue
186
222
185
15
76
67
1.6
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (uglm 3 )
Method: Gravinetric , 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs> Ant Ceo
Site I.D. Location County Address ( lObs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean C5D
20 1260 012 J02 Westbrook Cumbeniand Main Street 196 157 153 2 63 57 1.5
20 1280 003 JO2 Winslow Kennebec Gulley Hill Road 208 142 141 46 40 1.7
t ’)
C ’

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NA TIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITH
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m )
Method: Gravlmetric, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — HI—volume SA32 IA,
53 — Hi—volume GNW 9000, 54 — Hi—volume W1O
Max. 24—hr obs> Arith
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 150 Mean Method
20 0010 003 F05 Acadia National Hancock Ranger Headquarters, 94 46 34 11 01
Park McFarland Hill
20 0080 005 FOl Augusta Kennebec Fire Station, Hartford 145 89 73 25 52
Square
20 0100 002 FOl Bangor Penobscot Pump Station Washington 4 70 51 43? 01
Street
20 0100 002 FOl Bangor Penobscot Pump Station 74 100 75 31? 52
Street
20 0190 002 F05 Bridgton Cumberland Upper Ridge Road, Route 2 20 24 24 16 52
20 0380 001 F05 Farmlngton Franklin Fairgrounds 23 56 49 23? 01
20 0530 004 J02 Jay Franklin Bomaster Property, 117 76 57 21 52
Jay Hill
20 0460 007 J02 Lincoln Penobscot Thomas Motel Trailer Park 169 78 77 30 52
Broadway
20 0720 013 F02 Madawaska Aroostook Big Daddy’s Restaurant 104 U5 99 36 52

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — PM]A) PARTICULATE MATTER WITH
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m )
Method: Cravimetric, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — Hi—volume SAJ2IA,
53 — Hi—volume GMW 9000, 54 — Hi—volume W10
20 1205 008 J02
20 1260 012 J02
20 1280 003 302
Location
Portland
Portland
Presque Isle
Presque Isle
County
Cumbe rland
Cumber land
Aroos took
Aroos took
Washing ton
Cumberland
Kennebec
Main Street
Gulley Hill Road
#Obs
15
54
234
Max.
1st
44
54
199
Arith
Mean
28?
31
31
33? 52
22? 52
24 53
25 52
Site I.D .
20 0960 014
F’J 20 0960 014
03
20 0980 005
P01
FOl
P01
20 0980 009 F05
Address
Oxford and Elm Streets
Oxford and Elm Streets
Northeastland Hotel,
436 Main Street
City Dry Cleaners,
636 Main Street
Woodland High School
Wood land
24—hr obs>
2nd 150
39
52
121 1
Washington
County
Wes tbrook
Winslow
Method
0l
52
52
58 173 118
104 134 77
77 79 56
40 64 62

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Method: Atomic Absorptiorr-92
__________ _________ _______ Address ____
LePage Bakery,
60 Second Street
Pump Stations
Washington Street
Oxford and Elm Streets
Northeastland Hotel,
436 Main Street
Site I.D.
Location
County
20
0060
008
FOl
Auburn
Androscoggin
20
0100
002
FOl
Bangor
Penobscot
20
0960
014
FOl
Portland
Cumberland
20
0980
005
FOl.
PresSue Isle Aroostook
#Obs
61
56
112
66
Qtrly Arith Mean Means Max Values
1st 2nd 3rd 4th ) 1.5 1st 2nd
.07 .05 .08 .09 .30 .23
.08 .06 .06 .06 .18 .15
.12 .09 .09 .12 .33 .27
.11 .05 .06 .08 .20 .19
0

-------
TABLE 3 (ContInued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuous—li
Max 1—hr Obs Max 8—hr Obs
Site [ .1). Location County Address #Obs ist 2nd >40 1st 2nd >10
20 0960 018 P01 Portland Cumberland 529 Congress Street 6874 10.8 9.5 7.5 6.1
0

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/in 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluorescence—23
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address llObs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Me
20 0100 002 FOl Bangor Penobscot Pump Station, 672 84 55 139 132 231 155 30? 20
Washington Street
20 0315 002 J02 East Penobacot Katahdiu School, 531 59 54 204 155 390 309 16? 20
Millinocket Birch Street
20 0580 001 F02 Kittery York Greenfield Street 4078 83 66 172 163 380 272 10? 20
20 0580 003 F02 Kittery York Masonic Temple, 3794 91 90 264 225 343 333 25? 20
Government Street
20 0620 011 FOl Lewiston Androscoggin Parking Lot of 7938 122 101 263 210 351 338 20 20
Country Kitchen,
Canal Street
20 0640 007 J02 Lincoln Penobscot Thomas Motel 8153 86 82 203 162 225 217 12 20
Trailer Park,
Broadway
20 0640 008 J05 Lincoln Penobscot Base of Fish Hill 8316 31 30 133 114 270 149 7 20
20 0640 009 J05 Lincoln Penobscot Peak of Fish Hill 8271 56 53 281 239 540 396 7 20
20 0720 003 J02 Madawaska Aroostook Madawaska High 8155 86 83 361 273 432 398 13 20
School,
St. Thomas Street
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluore8cence—23
20 1150 001 J05
20 1150 007 J05
20 1183 006 F02
Thomas ton Knox
Knox
Waldo
Albert Street
Post Office
Carver’s Residence,
Fourth Street
Hunt’s Property,
Route 2
Great Northern Paper,
Wastewater Treatment
plant
York Street
Oxford and Elm Streets
Taylor Mountain I
Taylor Mountain It
Village Green,
Route 108
Mitchell Property,
2 Dexter Avenue
Marsh Road
Department of
Trans portatlon,
Searsport
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs>
1/Obs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300
603 553 30 20
665 482 34 20
406 328 23 20
757 359 25 20
527 424 22 20
503
451
16
20
267
267
30
20
663
610
34
20
639
610
23
20
534
529
23
20
47 45 12? 20
55 52 13? 20
985 972 14 20
Location County Address
Site I.D .
20 0720 009 J02
20 0720 012 J02
20 0760 010 J02
20 0760 011 J02
20 0780 006 J02
Madawaska
Mad awas ka
Mexico
Aroos took
Aroos took
Oxford
Max
Mexico Oxford
Nil linocket Penobscot
20 0780
20 0960
20 1020
20 1020
20 1020
009
014
005
006
007
Max 1—hr Ant
1st 2nd Mean !i!.
JO 2
FO 1
JO 2
JO 2
JO 2
Millinocket
Portland
Rumford
Rumford
Rumford
Penobscot
Cumbe r land
Oxford
Oxford
Oxford
8194
8190
7452
201
168
105
163
144
91
453
397
282
448
352
250
8259
154
137
333
324
8136
157
119
369
278
8230
8128
8333
8341
8245
245
217
381
347
257
205
22
17
44
42
205
6976
29
121
16
102
46
486
35
390
124
151
226
143
111
Thomas ton
Waldo
County
88
102
172
102
83
246
231
383
349
277
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluorescence—23
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site t.D. Location County Address UObs l et 2nd 365 let 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Me
20 1183 007 F02 Waldo Waldo West Cape Road, Cape 1765 94 66 328 191 550 330 17? 20
County Jellison
20 1205 007 J02 Washington Washington Georgia Pacific 5951 97 55 234 217 438 398 7? 20
County Corporation, Woodland
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED HATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MAINE — OZONE* (p )
Methods: Hourly Values, Chemiluminesceece—il, Ultra Violet Dasibi Corporation—l4
Valid Daily Max 1—hr Vals).125 Miss Days
Site I.D. Location County Address I /Mess I/Req 1st 2nd 3rd Meas Eat Assm
-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSA LUSETTS — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
Site I.D .
Location
County Address
Max 24—hr Ohs>
#Obs 1st 2nd 260
Obs> Ant Geo
150 Mean Mean
GSD
22
0240
012
P01
Boston
Suffolk
Fire Headquarters,
56
94
88
63
61
1.4
115 Southampton Street
22
0240
021
FOl
Boston
Suffolk
340 Breman Street,
East Boston
61
114
89
54
51
1.4
22
0240
024
FOl
Boston
Suffolk
200 Columbus Avenue
52
220
197
5
79
72
1.6
22
0240
027
FOl
Boston
Suffolk
One City Square, Charlestown
58
193
159
2
89
82
1.6
22
0320
003
FOl
Brockton
Plymouth
Crescent Street (Route 27)
61
92
77
38
35
1.5
-r
22
22
0380
0580
003
001
FOl
FOl
Chelsea
Fall River
Suffolk
Bristol
Powder Horn Hill
Fire Station, 165 Bedford
Street
58
60
98
92
80
83
42
44
39
41
1.5
1.4
22
0860
007
FOl
}lolyoke
flampden
One Court Square
60
130
109
56
50
1.7
22
1000
005
FOl
Lawrence
Essex
Storrow Park, High Street
12
58
57
40?
38?
1.4
22
1080
006
P01
Lowell
Middlesex
YMCA, 35 YMCA Drive
55
113
101
48
45
1.5
22
1220
002
FOl
Medford
Middlesex
Fire Headquarters, 100 to
120 Main Street
61
105
85
43
39
1.5
22
1500
004
FOl
New Bedford
Bristol
YMCA, 25 Water Street
59
70
63
36
34
1.4
22
1800
006
P01
Pittsfield
Berkshire
Berkshire Commons
7
152
77
1
66?
54?
2.0
22
1880
007
FOl
Quincy
Norfolk
Hancock Street
55
72
71
43
40
1.4
22
2160
007
FOl
Springfield
Hampden
East Columbus Avenue
23
163
152
2
80?
68?
2.0
22
2160
011
P01
Springfield
Hampden
59 Howard Street
58
102
101
56
53
1.4
22
2160
015
FOl
Springfield
Hampden
Springfield Community
College, Federal Street
11
67
63
42?
38?
1.6
? indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSAGIUSEflS - SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
__________ _________ _______ Address _____
Quaboag Regioaal High School,
River Street
Fire Station, Van Deene
Street
County Court, Woburn Street
and Montvale Avenue
419 Belmont Street
2 Washington Street
26 Salisbury Street
Site I.D.
Location
County
22
2372
001
FOl
Warren
Worcester
22
22
2475
2620
003
002
FOl
FOl
West
Springfield
Woburn
Hampden
Middlesex
22
22
22
2640
2640
2640
013
016
021
FOl
FOl
FOl
Worcester
Worcester
Worcester
Worcester
Worcester
Worcester
#Obs
Max 24—hr
1st 2nd
Obs>
260
Obs>
150
Ant
Mean
Geo
Mean
GSD
7
37
27
23?
22?
1.3
60
107
91
51
47
1.5
61
104
103
44
39
1.6
60
60
7
138
100
60
131
94
57
54
51?
42?
48
47?
39?
1.6
1.5
1.7
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDINC STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSACHUSETTS - PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITH AN
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — Ri—volume SA32IA,
53 — Hi—volume CMV 9000, 54 — Ri—volume W1O
Site I.D .
22 0240 002 FOl
22 0240
22 0240
22 1000
22 2160
22 2160
22 2360
22 2640
Location
Boa ton
Boa ton
Boa ton
Lawrence
Springfield
Springfield
Ware
Worcester
#Obs
89
Max.
1st
99
024 FOl
27 FOl
005 FOl
007 FOl
011 FOl
002 FOl
016 FOl
County
Suffolk
Suffolk
Suffolk
Essex
Hampden
Hampden
Hamp shire
Worcester
Address
Kenmore Square
590 Commonwealth Avenue
200 Columbus Avenue
One City Square, Charlestown
Storrow Park, High Street
East Columbus Avenue
59 Howard Street
Quabbin Summit
2 Washington Street
24—hr obs>
2nd 150
78
75
84
67
77
47
62
63
Arith
Mean
33
40?
40?
31?
44
27
18?
30
50 97
59 122
56 120
57 120
57 68
54 66
57 70
Method
01
52
52
52
52
52
01
52

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSAQIUSETIS — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Method: Atomic Absorption—92
Qtrly Arith Mean Means Max Values
Site I.D. Location County Address 1/Ohs 1st 2nd 3rd 4th > 1.5 1st 2nd
22 0240 002 FOl Boston Suffolk Kenmore Square, 52 .19 .13 .15 .15 .36 .30
590 Coiurixrnwealth Avenue
22 0240 027 FOl Boston Suffolk One City Square 59 .11 .10 .11 .11 .46 .25
22 1080 006 P01 Lowell Middlesex YMCA, 35 YMCA Drive 53 .17 .08 .09 .11 .69 .36
22 2160 007 FOl Springfield Hampdeu East Columbus Avenue 59 .29 .16 .22 .21 .56 .55
22 2160 011 FOl Springfield Hatnpden 59 Howard Street 58 .17 .09 .12 .13 .46 .33
22 2640 016 P01 Worcester Worcester 2 Washington Street 57 .07 .06 .06 .06 .12 .12

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NPITIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSA USET S — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuous—li
Max 1—hr Obs Max 8—hr Obs
Site I.D. Location County Address OObs 1st 2nd >40 1st 2nd >10
22 0240 002 P01 Boston Suffolk Kenmore Square, 590 Commonwealth 8414 11.5 11.5 7.3 6.6
Avenue
22 0240 015 P01 Boston Suffolk Kneeland Street 1040 5.8 5.8 4.6 4.5
22 0240 021 FOl Boston Suffolk 340 Brernan Street, East Boston 8405 9.2 8.1 7.0 6.0
22 0240 022 FOl Boston Suffolk 600 Washington Street 7934 25.3 18.4 12.0 12.0 3
22 1080 007 P01 Lowell Middlesex Old City Hall, Merrimack Street 5288 13.8 12.7 7.9 7.8
22 2160 007 P01 Springfield Hampden East Columbus Avenue 8696 18.4 17.3 12.5 11.2 2
22 2160 014 P01 Springfield Hampden Fernbank Street 8383 10.4 9.2 4.9 4.5
22 2640 020 FOl Worcester Worcester Fire Station, Central Street 8615 25.3 21.9 16.7 8.0 1
‘0

-------
TABLE 3 (Cont1r ued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
T}tAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSAGWSETIS — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Flame Photometric—16, Pulsed Fluorescetit—20
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address 1/Obs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Me
22 0240 002 FOl Boston Suffolk Kenmore Square, 7764 147 14.1 376 363 519 419 42 20
590 Commonwealth
Avenue
22 0240 015 FOl Boston Suffolk Kneeland Street 1749 105 99 174 174 204 194 45? 20
22 0240 021 FOl Boston Suffolk 340 Breman Street, 693 56 44 129 108 149 149 27? 16
East Boston
22 0240 021 P01 Boston Suffolk 340 Breman Street, 7437 113 113 234 202 377 354 37 20
East Boston
22 0380 003 P01 Chelsea Suffolk Powder Horn Hill 8238 121 121 276 275 529 309 31 20
22 0400 008 P01 Chicopee Hampden Westover Air Force 1159 111 111 207 186 288 262 44? 2
Base, Anderson
Road
22 0570 002 P01 Fairhaven Bri8tol Leroy Wood School 1018 69 66 150 114 204 162 36? 20
22 0580 004 FOl Fall River Bristol Globe Street 7498 99 89 197 189 341 338 24 20
22 0620 010 FOl Fitchburg Worcester 5 Summer Street 1146 138 101 249 218 309 254 41? 20
22 1000 005 P01 Lawrence Essex Storrow Park, 8327 120 110 213 210 328 301 26 20
High Street
22 1210 001 P01 Medfield Norfolk Medfield State 997 55 50 87 84 100 100 24? 20
Hospital,
Route 27
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED N TIOMAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSAQIUSETTS — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Flame Photometric—16, Pulsed Fluorescent—20
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Me
22 1800 007 P01 Pittsfield Berkshire Birch—Grove Drive 7181 111 81 203 162 375 241 37? 20
22 2160 009 FOl Springfield Hampden Longhill Street 8323 125 118 304 298 485 479 37 20
22 2160 015 FOl Springfield Hampden Springfield 7751 175 153 236 232 275 272 32 20
Community
College, Federal
Street
22 2360 002 FOl Ware Hampshire Quabbin Summit 4552 55 51 92 81 170 102 12? 20
22 2380 005 FOl Watertown Middlesex Victory Field 8253 103 77 314 214 367 364 22 20
22 2640 019 FOl Worcester Worcester Department of 8502 86 80 139 138 202 152 18 20
Public Works,
Belmont Street
22 2640 020 P01 Worcester Worcester Fire Station, 8549 139 103 220 220 322 322 24 20
Central Street
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSA HUSE11 S — NITROGEN DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Chemiluminescence—14
Max 1—hr Max 24—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 1st 2nd MeanU)
22 0240 002 FOl Boston Suffolk Kenmore Square, 7208 397 361 63
590 Comn nwealth Avenue
22 0240 021 FOl Boston Suffolk 340 Breman Street, East Boston 7355 376 301 63
22 0380 003 FOl Chelsea Suffolk Powder Horn Hill 7865 273 241 46
22 0580 004 FOl Fall River Bristol Globe Street 142 86 83 44?
22 1000 005 FOl Lawrence Essex Storrow Park, High Street 1324 229 224 53?
22 2160 015 FOl Springfield Hainpden Springfield Community College, 8487 203 203 41
Federal Street
22 2360 002 FOl Ware Hampshire Quabbin Summit 4745 389 387 21?
22 2640 020 FOl Worcester Worcester Fire Station, Central Street 3495 239 207 55?
)The primary standard for nitrogen dioxide is 100 ug/tn 3 , annual arithmetic mean.
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSACHUSETTS — OZONE*
Methods: Hourly Values, Cheniiluminescence—11, Ultra Violet Dasibi Corporation—14
Site I.D.
Loca: i.ii
County
Address
Valid
#Meas Re
Daily
1st
Max 1—hr
2nd 3rd
Vals>.125
Meas Est
Miss Days
s < td
Meth
22
0030
003
FOl
Agawam
Hampden
152 South Westfield
Street, Feeding Hills
200
214
.127
.125
.113
2
2.1
2
11
22
0060
002
FOl
Amherst
Hampshire
Solar Habitat,
University of
Massachusetts
30
214
.130
.095
.092
1
7.1
11
22
0060
002
FOl
Amherst
Hampshire
Solar Habitat,
University of
Massachusetts
179
214
.122
.107
.102
4
14
22
0380
003
P01
Chelsea
Suffolk
Powder Horn Hill
211
214
.125
.123
.103
1
1.0
2
11
22
0400
008
P01
Chicopee
Hampden
Westover Air Force
212
214
.135
.118
2
2.0
2
11
22
0535
001
FOl
Easton
Bristol
Base, Anderson Road
Post Office, 300 Main
Street
196
214
.114
.107
.103
5
11
22
0570
002
P01
Fairhaven
Bristol
Leroy Wood School
200
214
.151
.138
.138
3
3.2
4
11
22
1000
005
FOl
Lawrence
Essex
Storrow Park, High
Street
207
214
.103
.099
.096
11
22
1520
003
P01
Newburyport
Essex
Plum Island, Parker
River
209
214
.133
.128
.126
3
3.1
1
11
*Ozone season: April to October (214 days).

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 MASSACHUSETTS — OZONE* (ppm)
Methods: Hourly Values, Chemiluininescence—li, Ultra Violet Dasibi Corporation—14
Valid _ Dailjr_Max 1—hr Yals>.125 Miss Days
Site I.D. Location County Address #Meas uReA 1st 2nd 3rd Meas Est Assm
-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/in 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Obs> Ant Ceo
Site 1.0. Location Address #Obs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean CSD
30 0040 001 FOl Berlin Coos Angel Guardian School, 54 86 84 46 42 1.6
Sullivan Street
30 0040 001 J02 Berlin Coos Angel Guardian School, 110 100 100 49 44 1.7
Sullivan Street
30 0040 008 J02 Berlin Coos Dutil Street 117 202 197 6 71 59 1.9
30 0040 010 J02 Berlin Coos Burgess School, School 54 71 68 33 30 1.6
Street
30 0400 014 FOl Berlin Coos Trailer, Lancaster Street 56 161 160 4 78 69 1.7
30 0040 014 J02 Berlin Coos Trailer, Lancaster 113 270 224 1 12 82 69 1.8
Street
30 0040 016 J02 Berlin Coos 200 Enman Hill Road 53 82 51 27 23 1.8
30 0040 019 J02 Berlin Coos Cates Hill Road 56 57 53 24 20 1.9
30 0120 003 FOl Concord Merrimack State House Annex 56 121 90 35 31 1.7
30 0120 004 P05 Concord Merrimack Junction of Routes 3 16 111 104 67? 59? 1.7
and 93
30 0160 001 FOl Dover Stratford Central Avenue 59 149 111 40 35 1.6
30 0308 001 F03 Hollis Hill.shorough Elementary School, Silver 50 188 82 1 30 24 1.9
Lake Road (Route 122)
30 0420 008 P01 Manchester Hilisborough Notre Dame Avenue 57 123 81 43 39 1.6
30 0420 015 FOl Manchester Hillsborough Police Station, 58 77 77 40 37 1.6
351 Chestnut Street
7 Indicates th.it the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr Obs> Cbs> Ant Geo
Site I.D. Location County Address # Obs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean GSD
30 0420 015 F09 Manchester Hillsborough Police Station, 58 117 79 42 38 1.6
351 Chestnut Street
30 0420 016 F05 Manchester Hilisborough Harnett Park Municipal 57 116 95 47 43 1.5
Parking Lot
30 0420 016 F09 Manchester Hilisborough Harnett Park Municipal 60 111 98 48 44 1.5
Parking Lot
30 0480 007 P01 Nashua Hilisborough City Hall, Main Street 55 71 65 36 33 1.6
30 0480 007 F09 Nashua Hillsborough City Hall, Main Street 55 135 73 43 38 1.6
30 0480 010 FOl Nashua Hilisborough Sanders Associates, 56 172 107 1 44 37 1.8
Parking Lot D
30 0512 003 F05 Northumberland Coos Brooklyn Street 60 74 68 34 30 1.7
30 0512 005 FOl Northumberland Coos St. Francis Hall, 58 65 58 27 25 1.5
State Street
30 0512 006 FOl Northumberland Coos Wemyss Drive 53 111 65 29 26 1.7
30 0520 003 FOl Pembroke Merrimack Pembroke Hill, 44 85 66 25? 22? 1.7
Brickett Hill Road
30 0540 006 FOl Portsmouth Rockingham Court Street 59 84 75 35 32 1.5
30 0540 009 FOl Portsmouth Rockingham Vaughan Street 58 115 114 51 46 1.5
30 0540 011 F02 Portsmouth Rockingham 16 68 59 33? 26? 2.2
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE - PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITH AN
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m 3 )
Method: GravimetriC, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — Hi—volume SA32 IA,
53 — Hi—volume GMW 9000, 54 — Hi—volume W1O
Max. 24—hr obs> Arith
Site I.D. Location County Address lIObs 1st 2nd 150 Mean Method
30 0040 008 F05 Berlin Coos Dutil Street 172 95 73 32 52
30 0040 014 F05 Berlin Coos Trailer, Lancaster Street 330 150 115 38 52
30 0040 014 P05 Berlin Coos Trailer, Lancaster Street 105 98 70 32 54
30 0420 015 F05 Manchester Hilisborough Police Station 54 58 49 26 52
151 Chestnut Street
—I

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Method: Atomic Absorption—92
Qtrly Arith Mean Means Max Values
Site I.D. Location County Address # Obs 1st 2nd 3rd 4th > 1.5 1st 2 ncj
30 0040 001 P01 Berlin Coos Sullivan Street 51 .03 .03 .01 .02 .04 .03
30 0120 003 P01 Concord Merrimack State House Annex 49 .05 .04 .04 .04 .05 .05
30 0120 004 P01 Concord Merritnack Junction of Routes 3 and 93 54 .01 .08 .09 .08 .15 .10
30 0308 001 F03 Hollis Hulisborough Elen ntary School, Silver 42 .02 .02 .01 .02 .02 .02
Lake Road (Route 122)
30 0420 015 P01 Manchester Ilillaborough Police Station, 52 .08 .05 .05 .06 .10 .07
351 Chestnut Street
30 0420 015 F09 Manchester Hulisborough Police Station, 29 .05 .06 .06 .06
351 Chestnut Street
30 0480 007 P01 Nashua Hilisborough City Hall, Main Street 51 .05 .04 .04 .04 .07 .06
30 0480 007 P09 Nashua Hilisborough City Hall, Main Street 50 .06 .04 .04 .05 .06 .06
30 0480 010 P05 Nashua ililisborough Sanders Associates, 51 .04 .03 .02 .04 .05 .04
Parking Lot D
30 0540 006 FOl Portsmouth Rockingham Court Street 55 .05 .04 .04 .04 .07 .05

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDINC STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuous—il
Max 1—hr Obs Max 8—hr Obs>
Site I.D. Location County Address ( lObs 1st 2nd >40 1st 2nd 10
30 0420 017 P01 Manchester Hillsborough 1170 Elm Street 8382 19.6 18.4 16.1 12.7 9
30 0480 009 P01 Nashua Hillaborough Matarazzo Building, 8313 25.9 20.2 15.0 11.8 3
25 Main Street

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NA TIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — SULFuR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values 1 Pulsed Fluorescent—20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluorescence—23
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs lst 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Meth
30 0040 011 FOl Berlin Coos 116 Poplar Street 4986 88 77 218 216 448 312 14? 23
30 0040 011 P05 Berlin Coos 116 Poplar Street 3594 94 77 304 197 396 314 21? 23
30 0040 011 J02 Berlin Coos 116 Poplar Street 8581 88 83 271 247 436 396 22 20
30 0040 014 FOl Berlin Coos Lancaster Street 8184 254 253 262 259 393 262 24 23
30 0040 014 J02 Berlin Coos Lancaster Street 8492 72 71 260 175 385 377 18 20
30 0040 016 J02 Berlin Coos 200 Enman Hill Road 8664 180 97 349 299 518 517 17 20
30 0040 017 J02 Berlin Coos East Hill 8260 155 92 376 236 606 490 13 20
30 0040 019 J02 Berlin Coos Cates Hill Road 8059 174 151 351 301 485 473 20 20
30 0420 016 FOl Manchester Hhlisborough Harnett Park 8422 100 99 244 233 322 286 24 23
Municipal Parking
Lot
30 0440 006 F05 Merrimack Merrimack South Bow and 8699 89 82 431 332 781 493 12 23
County Dunbarton Roads,
Bow
30 0480 005 FOl Nashua Ililisborough 18 Mulberry Street 8476 96 82 135 127 178 170 24 23
30 0480 010 FOl Nashua Hillsborough Sanders Associates, 8415 73 69 121 116 225 191 22 23
Parking Lot D
30 0512 006 P01 Northuthberland Coos Wemyss Drive 8643 90 78 280 260 372 369 14 23
30 0512 007 P05 Northumberland Coos Covered Bridge, 8630 120 94 362 339 668 459 13 23
Routes 110 and 3
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY SATNDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluorescence 2 3
Site 1.0.
Location
County
Address
30
30
30
30
0512
0520
0520
0540
008
003
004
009
F05
P02
P05
FOl
Northumberland
Pembroke
Pembroke
Portsmouth
Coos
Merrimack
Merrimack
Rocldngham
Wemyss Drive
Pembroke Hill,
Brickett Hill
Hillcrest Avenue
Vaughan Street
Road
1/Obs
1st 2nd
Obs>
365
Max 3—hr
1st 2nd
Obs>
1300
Max
1st
2nd
Mean
Meth
8638
70
50
144
141
267
265
1035
15
18
23
23
8504
286
245
784
585
1058
5991
131
130
475
360
590
529
23?
23
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AiR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — NITROGEN DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Chemiluminescence—14
Max 1—hr ?Iax 24—hr Ant
T.catlon Countx Address ‘tOh I r 2nd ist - 2nd Mean 1 )
30 0420 016 FOl Manchester Hillsborough Harnett Park, Municipal 2581 105 105 3 !?
Parking Lot
4a1
0 - The annual standard for nitrogen dioxide is 100 ug/m 3 , annual arithmetic mean.
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy su=ary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE — OZONE*
Method: Hourly Values, Chemiluminescence—li
Site I.D.
Location
County
Address
Valid
#Meas Meg
Daily
Max
1—hr
Vals>.125
Meas Est
Miss Days
Assm
-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/ni 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Hi—volume Filter Sample—9 1
Max 24—hr Obs) Obs) Ant Ceo
Sitet Location Coua Address #Obs 1st 2nd 269_ SP Mean Mean GSD
41 0100 003 P01 Cranston Providence Fire Station 60 111 78 41 38 1.5
41 0120 008 FOI East Providence Providence Fire Station, North 53 90 86 41 38 1.5
Broadway
41 0120 009 FOL East Providence Providence Mobil Oil, Pawtucket 54 87 67 37 35 1.5
Avenue
41 0140 002 P03 Kent County Kent Alton Jones Campus, 45 89 41 21 18 1.6
University of Rhode
Island
,, 41 0180 001 P01 Newport Newport City Hall 60 88 71 33 31 1.4
a 41 0280 004 FOL Pawtucket Providence Hospital Trust, 215 Main 59 95 87 45 42 1.5
Street
41 0300 006 FOl Providence Providence 187 Westminster Street 59 88 84 47 44 1.5
41 0300 011 FOl Providence Providence Health Departnient 58 134 108 52 48 1.5
Parking Lot, State
Street
41 0300 015 P01 Providence Provide4ce Rhode Island Department of 50 101 85 46 43 1.5
Health, 50 Ornis Street
41 0300 017 P01 Providence Providence Bonanza Bus Terminal, 60 151 103 1 58 53 1.5
Sabin Street
41 0400 002 P01 Westerly Washington Police Department 59 150 108 52 47 1.5
41 0460 002 FOl Woonsocket Providence Post Office, 127 Social 55 125 96 47 43 1.5
Street

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITh AN
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ug/m 3 )
Method: Gravimetric, 24—hour Filter Sample
01 — Low—volume SA244E, 51 — Hi—volume SA321, 52 — Ri—volume SA32 IA,
53 — Hi—volume GHW 9000, 54 — Hi—volume WiG
Max. 24—hr obe> Arith
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 150 Mean Method
41 0300 011 P01 Providence Providence Health Department 57 72 65 29 52
Parking Lot, State
Street
41 0280 005 FOl Pawtucket Providence Summit Street 56 66 63 30 52

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
TFIAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 R}LODE ISLAND — LEAD (ug/m 3 )
Method: Atomic Absorption 9 2
Qtrly Arith Mean Means Max Values
Site 1.1). Address #Obs lst 2nd 3rd 4th > 1.5 1st 2nd
41 0100 003 P01 Cranston Providence FIre Station 60 .10 .07 .08 .09 .24 .17
41 0140 002 P03 Kent County Kent Alton Jones Campus, 45 .03 .02 .02 .02 .06 .04
University of Rhode Island
41 0300 006 FOl Providence Providence 187 Westminster Street 58 .12 .09 .09 .11 .31 .20
41 0300 007 FOl Providence Providence TraIler, Dyer Street 61 .18 .15 .17 .16 .36 .27
41 0300 017 FOL Providence Providence Bonanza Bus Terminal, 60 .13 .11 .12 .13 .31 .21
127 Social Street

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuourll
Address
Providence 76 Dorrance Street
Providence Rhode Island Department of
Health, 50 Orma Street
8323 15.5 14.1
8584 18.9 16.3
9.6 9.3
10.7 9.6
Sire Lqq t_ q Countx
4 1 0300 009 P01
41 0300 015 P01
Providence
Providence
U,
-a
Max 1—hr Obs 8-hz Obs
#Obs 1st 2nd >40 1st 2nd >10

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — SULFUR DIOXIDE (uglm 3 )
Methods: Hourly Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20, Ultra Violet Stimulated Fluorescence—23
Max
24—hr Obs> Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr Ant
Site _t Loc co u y AddresQ i Obs 1st 2nd 365 1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd Mean Meth
41 0280 005 P01 Pawtucket Providence Summit Street 731 147 141 335 314 788 365 50? 20
41 0280 005 FOl Pawtucket Providence Summit Street 7741 100 99 243 187 269 264 30 23
41 0300 009 P01 Providence Providence 76 Dorrance Street 6928 163 117 421 316 543 488 41 20
41 0300 009 FOl Providence Providence 76 Dorrance Street 1376 154 127 244 223 294 252 53? 23
41 0300 015 FOl Providence Providence Rhode Island Department 8245 160 118 328 260 410 384 31 23
of Health, 50 Orms
Street
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — NITROGEN DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Value, Chemiluminescence—14
Max 1-hr Max_24-hr Ant
Site I. D . Lucatiqi County k 4 4ra 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Meant 1)
41 0300 012 FOl Providence Providence Rockefeller Library, Prospect 1346 190 180 48
Street
(1)The annual standard for nitrogen dioxide is 100 ug/m 3 , annual arithmetic mean.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 RHODE ISLAND — OZONE* (ppm)
Chemiluminescence—li, Ultra Violet Dasibi Corporation—i 4
Valid Daily Max 1—hr
County Address ITMeas #Reg 1st 2nd 3rd
Kent A.lton Jones Campus, 30 214 .138 .125 .121
University of Rhode
Is land
Kent Alton Jones Campus, 158 214 .162 .122 .118
University of Rhode
Island
Providence Rockefeller Library, 209 214 .142 .133 .125
Prospect Street
Method: Hourly Values,
Site I.D. Location
41 0140 002 F03 Kent
County
41 0300 002 F03 Kent
County
41 0300 012 FOl Providence
Va].s>.125
Miss
Days
Meas
Est
Assm
-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AM8IENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (ug/m 3 )
Method: Cravimetric, 24—hour Hi—Volume Filter Sample—91
Max 24—hr 0t ,s> Obs> Ant Ceo
fObs 1st 2nd 260 150 Mean Mean CSD
Site ID.
Location
Counti
Address
47
0040
003
P01
Barre
Washington
South Seminary Street
47
0080
003
P31
Benuington
Bennington
Armory, Route 7
47
0120
003
P01
Brattleboro
Windham
232 Main Street
47
0140
005
P01
BurlI ngton
Chittenden
Court House, 39 Pearl Street
47
0390
001
P03
Randolph
Orange
Vermont Technical College
41
0400
004
P01
Rutland
Rutland
McAuliffe’s, IS to 19 Wales
c i
51 127
57 85
56 115
57 115
51 51
55 278
122 55 49 1.6
75 40 36 1.5
19 43 39 1.6
89 38 35 1.5
47 23 21 1.7
130 1 1 62 55 1.6

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — PM 10 PARTICULATE MATTER WITH AN
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER OF lOu OR LESS (ugh?)
Method:
Gravimetric, 24—hour Filter
Sample
01
53
— Low—volume SA244E,
— Hi—volume GM’ J 9000,
51
54
— RI—volume
— Hi—volume
SA321, 52 — Hi—volume SA32IA,
WiG
Site I.D.
Location
County
Address
1/Obs
Max.
1st
24—hr
2nd
obs>
150
Arith
Mean
Method
47 0040 003
P01 Barre
Washington
South Seminary Street
133
94
58
28
53
47 0120 003
FOl Brattleboro
Wiadham
232 Main Street
48
62
60
27
53
47 0140 003
P01 Burlington
Chittenden
82 South Winooski Avenue
53
55
46
26
53
47 0140 003
P09 Burlington
Chittenden
82 South Winooski Avenue
53
77
63
37?
52
47 0400 002
PCi Rutland
Rutland
9 Merchants Row
46
84
57
31?
53
47 0400 002
F09 Rutland
Rutland
9 Merchants Row
45
88
57
36?
52

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — CARBON MONOXIDE (mg/rn 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) Continuous—Il
Max 1-hr Obs Max St Obs
Site I Locat g çqupfl kddr bbs 1st 2nd >40 1st 2nd 12.
47 0140 003 FOE Bur1i gton Chittenden 82 South %Jirtooski Avenue 7676 19.7 14.3 7.1 6.8
5

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — SULFUR DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.
( ‘ Seasonal operation.
Max
24—hr Obs>
#Obs 1st 2nd 365
5432 76 73
7750 69 53
5508 124 110
Method: Hourly
Values, Pulsed Fluorescent—20
QtJL
Location
c?a n
d
47 0040 003
FOl
Barre
Washington
South Seminary
street(1)
47 0140 003
FOl
Burlington
Chittenden
82 South Winooski
47 0400 002
101
Rutland
Rutland
Avenue
9 Merchants Row 0 )
a ’
a
Max 3—hr Obs> Max 1—hr
1st 2nd 1300 1st 2nd
115 112 236 210
169 125 241 165
191 191 490 197
An t
Mean
21?
14
26?

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — NITROGEN DIOXIDE (ug/m 3 )
Method: Hourly Values, Chemiluminescence—14
Max 1—hr Max 24—hr Ant
Site I.D. Location County Address #Obs 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Mean ’
47 0140 003 FOl Burlington Chittenden 82 South Winooski Avenue 5085 145 139 34?
0)
(1) The primary standard for nitrogen dioxide is 100 us/rn 3 , annual arithmetic mean.
? Indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria.

-------
TABLE 3 (Continued)
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA INCLUDING STATIONS
THAT EXCEED NATIONAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
1986 VERMONT — OZONE* (ppm)
Method: Hourly Values, Ultraviolet Dasibi Corporation—14
Valid - Daily Max 1-hr Vals>. 125 Miss Days
Site I.D . Location Counts Address #Meas #Reg 1st 2nd 3rd Meas Est Assm
-------
TABLE 4
NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATING NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS*
BY AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
Particulates CO SO , _________ ________ Pb
Annual
2 4 —hour 24—hour Geometric Annual Annual Quarterly
AQCR Secondary Primary Mean Hour 8—hour 24—hour Average Average Hour Average
AQCR No. State 150 tigfm’ 260 ug/m 3 75 ug/m 3 40 mgI !? 10 mg/rn 3 365 ug/m 3 80 ug/m 3 100 ug/m 3 0.12 ppm 1.5 ug/m 3
Eastern 041 CF 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/2 0/2 112 0/5
Connecticut
Hartford — 042 C T 0/30 0/30 0/30 1/4 2/4 0/10 0/10 0/2 3/4 0/27
New Haven —
Springfield
Hartford — 042 MA 1/5 0/5 0/5 0/2 1/2 0/4 0/4 0/2 3/4 0/2
New Haven —
Springfield
New Jersey — 043 Cr 0/16 0/16 0/16 0/2 0/2 0/7 0/7 0/1 3/4 0/14
New York —
Connecticut
Northwestern 044 CT 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2
Connecticut
Androscoggin 107 ME 2/25 0/25 0/25 0/12 0/12 0/4 0/1
Valley
Androscoggin 107 NH 3/Il 0/11 0/11 0/10 0/10 0/1 0/i
Valley
WUnless the second highest average exceeds the NAAQS, there is no violation.
x/y: x is the number of stations in violation;
y is the total number of stations reporting data for time period.
This pollutant is not monitored in the AQCR (state portion).

-------
TABLE 4 (Continued)
NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATING NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS*
BY AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
Aroos took
Metropolitan
Portland
Northwest
Maine
Massachusetts
108 ME 2/3
111 ME
Metropolitan 119 MA
Boston
Metropolitan 120
Providence
Metropolitan 120
Providence
MA 0/3
RI 0/12
CO SO,
Annual
Geometric
Mean Hour 8—hour 24—hour
75 ug/m 40 mg/rn 3 10 mg/rn 3 365 ug/m 3
1/3 0/3
0/10 0/10
0/1 0/1
0/2 0/2
0/3
0/3
0/2 0/2
0/2 0/2
0/3 0/3
NO 7 O Pb
1/3 0/1
0/1 1/2
0/1 2/2
0/5
Unless the second highest average exceeds the NAAQS, there is no violation.
x/y: x is the number of stations in violation;
y is the total. number of stations reporting data for time period.
—— This pollutant is not monitored in the AQCR (state portion).
AQCR
Particulates
AQCR
No .
24—hour
Secondar
State 150 ug/m
24—hour
Primary
260 ug/m 3
Down East
109 ME 2/17
110 ME 2/10
0/17
0/17
Annual
Average
80 ug/rn 3
a,
Berkshire
Central
0/8
0/8
117 MA 0/1
118 MA 0/4
2/8
Annual Quarterly
Average Hour Average
100 ug/m 3 0.12 ppm 1.5 ug/m 3
0/1
0/2 0/1
0/1
0/3
0/1 0/1
0/1
0/4
0/1 0/1
0/4 0/4
0/8 1/8
0/3 0/3
0/12 0/12
0/1
1/4
0/3
0/6
0/3
0/6
0/1
0/2
0/1
0/2

-------
TABLE 4 (Continued)
NUMBER OF STATIONS VIOLATING NATIONAL ANBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS*
BY AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION
Particulates CO SO 7 NO 9 Op Pb
Annual
24—hour 24—hour Geometric Annual Annual Quarterly
AQCR Secondary Primary Mean Hour 8—hour 2 4 —hour Average Average Hour Average
AQCR No. State 150 ug/& 260 ug/m 3 75 ug/m 3 40 mg/ t n 3 10 mg/rn 3 365 ug/m 3 80 ug/tn 3 100 ug/m 3 0.12 ppm 1.5 ug/m 3
Merrimack 121 MA 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/i 1/2 0/1
Valley
Merrimack 121 NH 0/16 0/16 0/16 1/2 2/2 0/7 0/7 0/1 1/4 0/7
Valley
Central 149 NH
New Hampshire
Champlain 159 VT 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1
Valley
Vermont 221 VT 0/4 0/4 0/4 0/1 oh 0/1
*Unless the second highest average exceeds the NAAQS, there is no violation.
x/y: x is the number of stations in violation;
y is the total number of stations reporting data for time period.
- TlIIb polluL 1nl. lb (kOL LuorLLLorea in the A LR (state portion).

-------
REGION I
AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGIONS
I —
I
I
/
221
149
041
042
043
044
107
108
109
110
111
117
J18
119
120
121
149
159
Figure 1
- Eastern CT
- Hartford-New Haven-
Springfield
- NJ-NY-CT
- Northwestern CT
- Aridroscoggin Valley
- Aroostook
- Down East
- Met. Portland
- Northwest ME
- Berkshire
- Central MA
- Met. Boston
- Met. Providence
- Merrimack Valley
- Central NH
- Champlain Valley
- Vermont
108
111
I-
I
109
107
121
ii

-------
TABLE 5
STATIONS WHERE READINGS EXCEED EPISODE LEVELS
January—December 1986
Total Suspended Particulates
(ug/m 3 )
City Highest Level
Standard State AQCR ( Address) Site No. Mo./Day Duration Reached
EnErgency None
24 hour avg. =
875 ug/m 3
Warning None
24 hour avg. =
625 ug/m 3
jUert
24 hour avg. ME 108 Presque Isle 20 0980 005 FOl 12/02 24 hours 469
375 uglm 3 Northeastland Hotel
436 Main Street

-------
TABLE 5 (Continued)
STATIONS WHERE READINGS EXCEED EPISODE LEVELS
January—December 1986
Carbon Monoxide
(mg/rn 3 )
Highest Level
Standard State AQCR city_ Site No . Mo.!: j(T ui-.) Duration _R eqçhed
Emergency None
8 hour avg.
46 mg/rn 3
Warnii g None
8 hour avg.
34 mg/rn 3
Alert
8 hour avg. None
17 mg/rn 3

-------
TABLE 5 (Continued)
STATIONS WHERE READINGS EXCEED EPISODE LEVELS
January—December 1986
Sulfur 9 oxide
(ugfm )
Highest Level
Standard State A CR Cit Site No. Mo./Da y( • e )uratlon _ Re ched -
Emergency None
3 hour avg. =
2100 ug/m 3
Warning None
3 hour avg. =
1600 ug/m 3
Alert None
3 hour avg. =
BOO ugfm 3

-------
TABLE S (Continued)
STATiONS WHERE READINGS EXCEED EPISODE LEVELS
January-December 1 986
Ozone (ppm)
Highest Level
Standard State AQC City tlo./Day_(Tine) Duration Reached
Alert None
1 hour avg.
0.204 ppm
a

-------
1986 PRECISION AND ACCURACY DATA
Current Federal Regulations require that each state report both pre-
cision and accuracy data for all data from National Air Monitoring sites
(NANS), and State/Local Monitoring Sites (SLAMS). Tables 6 and 7 list the
precision and accuracy data submitted by the six New England States. The
data listed in these tables are calculated from the upper and lower 95%
probability limits in percent difference from a known standard and are
arlthmetric averages of quarterly summary data: The accuracy data in Table
7 are only for the lowest reported concentration range. For TSP, the
accuracy limits apply only to the flow measurement, and the precision
limits are the 95% confidence limits between co—located monitors.
Due to problems resulting from the changeover to a new computerized
reporting system, 1986 National Statistics and Region I Summary Data were
not available at the time of publication. The average values reported
herein were calculated from submitted raw data and may differ slightly from
the final national summary.
From these tables, CO has the lowest probability limits generally
within + 10%. All the other pollutants reported are, in general, within
approximately ± 15%. Although no acceptance criteria have been set by EPA
to date, Region I expects this type of performance to be satisfactory. For
comparison, the 1985 National Statistics are also included in Tables 6A and
7A. (1986 National Statistics were not available at publication time.)
Generally, precision and accuracy data did not change significantly
from that reported in 1985. There were improvements in CO accuracy in all
states except Rhode Island. Pb accuracy improved in Connecticut, Maine,
and New Hampshire. SO 2 accuracy improved in Rhode Island as did NO 2 accu-
racy in Rhode Island. Ozone accuracy was somewhat worse in Vern nt.
NO 2 precision Improved in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. TSP pre-
cision got worse in Massachusetts, and Pb precision was worse in Massachu-
setts and Rhode Island.

-------
1986 PRECISION DATA FOR NEW ENGLANO
ANNUAL AVERAGE PROBABILITY LIMITS IN PERCENT
ME
—07 to +04
—04 to +04
SO 2
CO
NO 2
03
TSP
Pb
MA
—11 to +04
—04 to +05
—11 to +06
—09 to 407
—16 to +17
—21 to 21
NH
—10 to +07
—09 to +06
—09
—09
—12
—09
—15
—18
to +07
to +09
to +12
to +08
to +16
to +19
RI
—06 to 407
—04 to 406
—01 to +06
—06 to +04
—08 to +12
—18 to +24
VT
—10 to +02
—05 to +06
—18 to +13
—05 to 407
—05 to +04
CT
S°2 —09 to +07
CO —O7to+04
NO 2 —12 to +14
03 —OBto+07
TSP —10 to +08
Pb —10 to +10
(ANALYSIS)
—04
—11
—04
to +07
to +07
to +11
—08
—08
—08
to +06
to +16
to +17
TABLE 6A
1985 NATIONAL STATISTICS 1
U)The values reported are the 50th percentiles
for all reporting agencies.
16

-------
TABLE 7
1986 ACCURACY DATA FOR NEW ENGLAND ANNUAL AVERAGE PROBABILITY LIMITS
(CONTINUOUS METHODS),
(Pb) REPORTED IN PERCENT
FOR THE LOWEST CONCENTRATION
FLOW RATE (TP, Pb), AND ANALYSIS
CT
ME
MA
NH
RI
V
so 2
—04
to
407
—08
to
+08
—14
to
+06
—08
to
+07
—11
to
+07
—08
to
+04
CO
—02
to
05
—02
to
0
401
to
-+09
—01
to
÷05
—03
to
4-03
—02
t
+01
NO 2
—03
to
—01
———
—17
to
+11
———
—03
to
+03
—06
to
+03
03
—09
to
—01
—06
to
+07
—09
to
+10
—09
to
+05
0
to
+11
—07
to
+08
TSP
(FLOW)
-03
to
404
—02
to
+07
—05
to
+07
—06
to
+05
—05
to
+05
—03
to
+04
Pb
(ANALYSIS)
-04
to
+01
—08
to
+04
—01
to
+03
-06
to
+06
—04
to
+07
TABLE 7A
1985
NATIONAL
STATISTICSU)
SO 2
—16 to +14
CO
—14 to +13
NO 2
—20 to +21
03
—14 to +12
TSP
(FLOW)
—08 to +08
Pb
—12 to +10
‘ The values reported are the 50th percentiles
for all reporting agencies.
11

-------
REGION I 1986 PERFORMANCE AUDIT PROGRAM
Region I conducts an audit program to determine the performance of
ambient air monitoring systems and to provide their operators with technical
assistance in improving data quality. Continuous air monitors are audited
by allowing them to sample gas mixtures containing known concentrations of
specific pollutants and noting the analyzers’ responses. High—volume air
samplers for TSP, lead, and iahalab1e particulates (PM—b) are audited
by attaching a flow reference device and comparing a known air flow rate
with the rate recorded or indicated by the sampler.
A total of 163 audits were conducted in the six New England states for
particulates (TSP, lead, and PM—1O), SO 2 CO, NO 2 and ozone by personnel
from Region I. In general, the results were very good with 151 audits
(93%) satisfactory, 8 audits (5%) marginal, and onLy 4 audits (2%)
unsatisfactory. These results are similar to those achieved in 1985.
Particulate sampler audit results were relatively unchanged from 1985,
during which 4% of the audits were marginal and 2% were unsatisfactory. In
1986, 4% were marginal, and 3% were unsatisfactory.
Performance on individual NO 2 audits improved in 1986 as a result of
better monitoring equipment and calibration procedures.
Ozone audits were generally good in all six states.
SO 2 audit results were generally satisfactory with the exception of
three marginal audits and one failure in Connecticut and a marginal audit
in Rhode Island. Region I provided the states with assistance in diagnosing
the possible causes of the failures. As in 1985, most of the failed analyzers
were older units in which critical components malfunctioned. These results
indicate the need for replacement or repair of older analyzers in those
states affected.
Results for CO were generally good in all states audited.
Table 8 summarizes the results of the audit program on a state—by—state
basis.
18

-------
TABLE 8
REGION I PERFORMANCE AUDIT PROGRAM’ — 1986
Pollutant/Parameter
CT ME MA NH RI VT
Particulates 2
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
CO
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
9-3
Number
Number
Number
Number
of Audits
of Satisfactory Audits
of Marginal Audits
of Unsatisfactory Audits
of Audits
of Satisfactory Audits
of Marginal Audits
of Unsatisfactory Audits
of Audits
of Satisfactory Audits
of Marginal Audits
of Unsatisfactory Audits
of Audits
of Satisfactory Audits
of Marginal Audits
of Unsatisfactory Audits
of Audits
of Satisfactory Audits
of Marginal Audits
of Unsatisfactory Audits
15 26 9 15 13 8
14 23 7 15 12 8
1 3 0 0 0 0
O 0 2 0 1 0
13 3 5 5 5 5
9 3 5 5 4 5
3 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 4 3 3 1
4 1 4 3 3 1
O 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 1 1
2 0 1 1
O 0 0 0
O 0 0 0
4 3 3 3 3 2
O 3 3 3 3 2
O 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0
‘Seven of the reported audits were performed by
The remainder were done by Region I personnel.
operated NAilS, SLAMS, and special study monitors.
an EPA contractor (RTI).
Includes only state—
2 Flow rate audits of high—volume air samplers including those sampling for
lead, TSP, and PM 10 .
Satisfactory audit is defined as an average percent difference less than
6% for TSP; 10% for SO 2 , O, and 03; and 15% for NO 2 .
Marginal audit is defined as an average percent difference between 6—10%
for TSP; 10—15% for SO 2 , CO and 03; and 15—20% for NO 2 .
Unsatisfactory audit is defined as an average percent difference of greater
than 10% for TSP; greater than 15% for S02, cO, and 03; and greater than
20% for NO 2 .
3
3
0
0
•19

-------
TABLE 9
REGION I NONATTAINMENT AREAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986
Date and Magnitude of Last
Reported Violation to NAAQS ( 1 )
Connecticut
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 41 1976 163 ug/rn 3 ( 3 )
AQCR 42 1986 449 uglrn 3
AQCR 43 1980 160 uglrn 3
AQCR 44 1979 159 ug/m 3
o Primary Standards for CO
AQCR 42 1986 12.6 mg/rn 3
AQCR 43(2) 1986 12.5 mg/rn 3
o Primary Standard for 03
AQCR 41 1986 0.144 ppm
AQCR 42 1986 0.160 ppm
AQCR 43 1986 0.154 ppm
AQCR 44 1980 0.211 ppm
Maine
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 107
Augusta 2 ) 1986 183 ug/m 3
AQCR 109
Woodland (Baileyville) 1986 222 ug/m 3
Bangor—Brewer 1986 231 ug/m 3
Lincoln ( 2 ) 1986 163 ug/m 3
o PrImary Standards for SO 2
AQCR 109
Millinocket 1980 548 ug/1n 3
o Primary Standards for 03
AQCR 107(2) 1986 0.126 ppm
AQCR 110 1986 0.126 ppm
( 1 )A1l values listed are the second highest values reported.
Only data currently in the EPA system are listed.
(2 Exceedance only.
3 ThIs site does not meet EPA TSP siting criteria, TSP monitor collocated
with PM 10 monitor for special study only.
8$

-------
TABLE 9 (Continued)
REGiON I NONATTAINMENT AREAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986
Date and Magnitude of Last
Reported Violation to NAAQS( 1 )
Massachusetts
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 042
Springfield 1986 152 ug/m 3 ( 5 )
AQCR 117
Adams 3 ) 1977 178 ug/m 3
North Adains ( 3 ) 1977 197 ug/m 3
pittsfield( 2 ) 1986 152 ug/m 3
AQCR 118
Athol( 3 ) 1980 158 ug/m 3
Worcester 1981 156 ug/ni 3
AQCR 119
Cambrid e ( 3 ) 1978 237 ug/m 3
Danvers 3 ) 1975 185 ug/m 3
Framin ham ( 3 ) 1973 151 ug/rn 3
Lynn 3 1975 159 ug/tn 3
Marblehead ( 3 ) 1975 171 ug/m 3
Medford 3 ) 1978 167 ug/tn 3
Norwood ( 3 ) 1973 235 ug/rn 3
Peabody( 3 ) 1977 190 ug/n1 3
Qu1ncy 3 ) 1982 182 ug/m 3
Revere ( 3 ) 1980 166 ug/ui 3
Svampacott ( 4 )
Waltham 1978 184 ug/m 3
AQCR 120
Fall River 1975 188 ug/m 3
AQCR 121
Haverhill 1975 163 ug/tu 3
Lawrence( 3 ) 1978 172 ug/m 3
o Primary Standards for CO
AQCR 042
Springfield 1986 11.2 mg/rn 3
AQCR 118
worcester ( 2 1986 16.7 mg/rn 3
1 All values listed are the second highest values reported.
Only data currently in the EPA system are listed.
(2 )Exceedance only.
3 Exceedence only; no violations in the last five years.
sites at this location.
5 S1te does not meet EPA siting criteria for TSP, monitor collocated with
PM 10 monitor for special study only.
8l

-------
TABLE 9 (Continued)
REGION I NONATTAINMENT AREAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986
Date and Magnitude of Last
R’-ported Vtolatlon to N QS C
Massachusetts (Contthue’l)
AQCR 119
Boston 1986 11.2 mg/rn 3
Cambridge 1978 10.9 mg/rn 3
Medford 1980 12.2 mg/rn 3
Quincy 1977 10.9 mg/rn 3
Waltham 1978 10.6 mg/rn 3
AQCR 121
Lowell 1984 12.8 mg/rn 3
o Primary Standard for 03
AQCR 042 1986 0.135 ppm
AQCR 117 1983 0.135 ppm
AQCR 118 1985 0.140 ppm
AQCR 119 (2) 1986 0.125 ppm
AQCR 120 1986 0.138 ppm
AQCR 121 1986 0.128 ppm
New Hampshire
o PrImary Standards for TSP
AQCR 107
Metropolitan Berlin 1986 224 ug/m 3
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 121
Metropolitan Manchester 1980 156 ug/m 3
o Primary Standards for CO
AQCR 121
City of Manchester 1986 12.9 mg/rn 3
Nashua 1986 11.8 mg/rn 3
( 1 )All values listed are the second highest values reported.
Only data currently in the EPA system are listed.
(2 )Exceedance only.
82

-------
TABLE 9 (Continued)
REGION I NONATTAINMENT AREAS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986
Date and Magnitude of Last
Reported Violation to NAAQS( 1 )
New Hampshire (Continued)
o Primary Standard for 03
AQCR 121 1986 0.130 ppm
Rhode Island
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 120
Providence ( 2 ) 1986 151 ug/m 3
o Primary Standards for CO
AQCR 120
Providence ( 2 ) 1986 10.7 mg/rn 3
o Primary Standard for 03
AQCR 120 1986 0.138 ppm
Vermont
o Secondary Standards for TSP
AQCR 159
Burlington and adjacent
cities and towns 1984 156 ug/m 3
AQCR 221
City of Barre 1984 163 ug/m 3
1 A1l values listed are the second highest daily reported.
Only data currently in the EPA system are listed.
(2 Exceedaace only.
83

-------
TABLE 10
REGION I ATTAINMENT AND UNCLASSIFIED AREAS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1986, WITH VIOLATIONS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS
Second H1 st Values ear
Maine
o Primary Standards for TSP
— AQCR 107
Augusta 314 ug/m 3 [ 984
— AQCR 108
Presque Isle 316 ug/m 3 1984
o Secondary Standards for TSP
— AQCR 107
Lewiston—Auburn 1 156 ug/m 3 1986
Oxford County 213 ug/m 3 1986
— AQCR 108
Madawaska 158 ug/m 3 1986
Presque Isle 276 ug/m 3 1986
— AQCR 109
Millinocket( 1 ) 160 ug/m 3 1986
old Town 151 ug/m 3 1984
— AQCR 110
Berwick(’) 162 ug/m 3 1986
westbrook 185 ug/m 3 1986
— AQCR 111
Jay 160 ug/rn 3 1984
Massachusetts
o Primary Standards for TSP
— AQCR 119 82 ug/m 3 (annual 1986
Boston geometric mean)
(1 )Exceedance only.

-------
TABLE 10 (Continued)
REGION I ATTAINMENT AND UNCLASSIFIED AREAS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1986 WITh VIOLATIONS IN ThE LAST THREE YEARS
Second Highest Values Year
Massachusetts (Continued)
o Secondary Standards for TSP
— AQCR 119
Boston 197 ug/m 3 1986
New Hampshire
o Secondary Standards for TSP
- AQCR 121
Holl1s 1 188 ug/m 3 1986
Nashua 1 ) 172 ug/m 3 1986
Vermont
o Primary Standards for TSP
— AQCR 159
Rutlaad 1 ) 278 ug/m 3 1986
(1 )Exceedance only.
( 2 Site does not meet EPA siting guidelines for TSP, monitor collocated with
PM 1 O monitor for special study only.
85

-------
AIR QUALITY SUMMARIES AND TRENDS
The next several pages contain a discussion of the air quality and
selected trends for each of the New England States. The data for these
analyses were collected by the New England States and were submitted to
EPA in fulfillment of the Federal monitoring requirements.
In evaluating the five—year urban air quality trends throughout New
England, a statistical program package developed by Region 5 was used to
help characterize the trends for TSP,Pb, CO, NO 2 and SO 2 sites. Due to an
insufficient data base, these programs were not employed for 03 sites.
This statistical program segments the data at each site into monthly cells,
produces monthly means, deseasonalizes these monthly means by aligning the
data for various years (in this case, five years 1982—1986) for each common
month, performs a linear regression on these deseasonalized monthly means,
and finally computes two test statistics which indicate the relative signi-
ficance of any trends identified. To be consistent with the appropriate
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), geometric means are used
for TSP, while arithmetic means are used for the other pollutants. TSP,
Pb, 00, SO 2 , and N02 trend lines for selected air monitoring sites are
presented in Figures 2 through 6.
A different approach was used to present ozone trends. Ozone viola-
tions only occur during the late spring and summer months in New England.
Monitoring ia conducted from April through October only; consequently, the
deseasonalized linear regression lines would be of little value. Figure 7
shows a plot of the number of days over the standard for selected sites in
Stratford, Connecticut; Cape Elizabeth, Maine; Fairhaven, Massachusetts;
Portsmouth, New Hampshire; and Kent County, Rhode Island. The sites se—
lee ted for this figure show both increasing and decreasing trends. When
important and complex role in the formation of ozone. Given the yearly
variation in meteorology, it is possible that the apparent fluctuations in
ozone levels are a result of normal variations due to meteorology rather than
actual reduction in emissions.

-------
1986 CONNECTICUT AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TSP/PM 1 o
There were no exceedences of the daily secondary standard during 1986
at those sites with exceedencea in 1985. However, several sites set up to
measure PM 10 reported either violations or exceedences to TSP NAAQS. These
sites do not meet siting criteria for TSP. The highest annual geometric mean
was measured in Hartford at 55 ug/m 3 or 72% of the annual primary NtAQS.
Annual geometric means were 72% of the standard in Bridgeport, 71% in Stain-
ford and 67% in Waterbury. The maximum second highest daily average was
measured in Stratford and was 57% of the primary daily NAAQS. The second
highest daily averages in the larger urban areas ranged from 26% to 55% of
the primary daily NAAQS. Rural background levels were 28% of the annual
primary standard and 40% of the secondary daily standard. In general, urban
TSP levels were less than those reported in 1985
Five—year trend lines were prepared for thirty—nine TSP sites in Con-
necticut. One site in Middletown had an increasing trend at least at the
90% confidence level. Three sites had decreasing trends. Thirty—five sites
did not show significant trends, although the majority of these sites had a
definite positive slope. The trend lines for both Bridgeport and Hartford
are shown in Figure 2.
Five new PM 10 sites were established in Bridgeport, Hartford, New
Raven, Waterbury and West Haven. Only the site in New Haven reported levels
above the new PM 10 annual standard. The other sites were from 67% to 80%
of the new standard.
Pb
There were no violations to the NAAQS reported in 1986. The highest
quarterly average was measured in Hartford at 28% of the NAAQS. Waterbury
had the second highest quarterly average also at 28% of the standard.
Maximum quarterly averages in other urban areas ranged from 3.0% to 27% of
the standard. In general, lead levels are lower than those reported in
1985, 1984 and 1983.
81

-------
CO
There were no exceedences or violations of the 1 hour NAAQS reported
in 1986. Hartford reported violations of the 8—hour NA.AQS, and there was one
exceedeuce in Stamford In total, seven CO 8—hour exceedences were reported
in 1986 as compared to the seven exceedences reported in 1985 and fifteen
In 1984. In general, Connecticut’s 1986 CO levels were lower than those
reported in 1985.
A five—year trend analysis was prepared for five CO sites. These
sites all showed significant downward trends. The Stamford CO site is
Included in Figure 4.
Q2
No violations or exceedences to the NAAQS were reported in 1986. The
maximum SO 2 annual averages occurred in New Haven at 49% of the standard,
and in Hartford at 45%. The highest daily SO 2 levels were measured in New
Haven at 82% of the daily standard. The second highest daily average
occurred in Milford at 64% of the NAAQS.
In general, 1986 SO 2 annual averages were higher than those Ia 1985
and 1984. The five—year trends for eighteen sites were analyzed. One
Bridgeport site and Hartford trailer site showed significant downward
trends while six sites showed a significant upward swing. These included
New Britain, New Haven, Norwalk, Stamford and Waterbury. Ten sites showed
no significant trend, but the majority of these had an upward slope. The
New Haven trailer SO 2 trend line is included In Figure 5.
The NO 2 sites in Bridgeport, East Hartford and New Haven reported values
of 50%, 41% and 54% of the annual standard, respectively. These values are
generally the same as those reported in 1985 and 1984. The five—year trend
lines for for these sites were analyzed. The New Haven trailer site and the
88

-------
East Hartford site showed non—significant trends, and the Bridgeport site
displayed a significant downward trend. These plots are displayed in
Figure 6.
23
Every site in Connecticut reported between one to eight days over the
primary NAAQS. The maximum daily reading during 1986 was .193 ppm and
occurred in Greenwich. [ n general, ozone levels were lower in 1986 than
the 1985 or 1984 values. Figure 7 shows a plot of the number of days over
the standard for the Stratford site.
SI

-------
1986 MAINE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TSP/PM 10
A Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) violation was
measured in Presque Isle. Secondary standards violations were reported in
Auburn, Bangor, Madawaska, Oxford County, Presque Isle, Washington County,
and Westbrook. An exceedence was reported in Augusta, Berwick, Lincoln and
Millinocket. There were no violations of the annual standard. The annual
geometric mean was 79% of the NAAQS in Bangor, 67% in Portland and 69% in
Presque Isle. The TSP site with the best air quality was Acadia National
Park which reported levels 16% of the annual NAAQS.
The five—year trend analysis was performed on forty—eight TSP sites in
Maine. Of these, two showed significant increasing trends, Westbrook and
Bangor. Twenty—three sites shoved no significant trends and the remaining
twenty—three sites showed a significant downward trend. The majority of
the regression lines show a downward trend. Figure 2 shows a five—year
trend lines for Lincoln and Bangor.
Sixteen sites were operated for PM 10 . Only Presque Isle showed
violations to the new PM 10 standard.
Lead
There were no violations of the quarterly lead NAAQS. The highest
statewide concentration was measured in Portland and was 22% of the stan-
dard. The state’s microscale site which was designed to measure maximum
levels in Portland was shut down during 1985 because of road construction.
Maximum levels measured in Bangor and Presque Isle were approximately 8% of
the standard. Lead levels generally followed a decreasing trend throughout
the State.
CO
The only CO monitoring site in the State is located in Portland. The
site was moved from Bangor in 1984. Reported CO levels in Portland were
higher than the levels measured in Bangor. The maximum 1—hour value in
Portland decreased from 15.6 mg/rn 3 in 1985 to 10.8 mg/rn 3 in 1986. The
maximum 8—hour value also showed a slight decrease.
go

-------
The highest 1986 concentration was 27% of the 1 hour NAAQS, and for
the 8 hour NAAQS, the highest concentration was 75% of the standard. Port-
land CO levels appear to be slightly lower over the past two years. At
present, there i insufficient data in Portland to conduct a five year
trend analysis.
Q2
The highest daily SO 2 levels were monitored in Rumford at an indus-
trial site. The values were approximately 63% of the 24 hour standard.
Monitored value8 in Millinocket were 44% of the standard, while Madawaska
and Lewiston showed values of approximately 55% and 34% of the daily
standard. The highest 3—hour levels were monitored at an industrial site
in Waldo County at 37% of the standard.
The five—year trend analysis was conducted for sixteen sites. Nine
sites showed decreasing trends, while five showed no significant trends.
Sites in Mexico and Portland showed a significant upward trends. Figure 5
shows a trend line for Lewiston.
22
Maine is not required to monitor NO 2 .
23
of the eight sites operated in Maine, three monitors measured at least
one day over the NAAQS. The York County site measured two days over the
standard, Cape Elizabeth and Knox County sites measured one day over the
standard.
The highest value recorded (.142 ppm) was measured at the York
County site. The site measuring the lowest values is located in Frank-
lin County. This site measured a maximum value of .081 ppm or 68% of
the NAAQS.
In general, ozone values and the number of days over the standard
decreased from 1985 and 1984 results. Figure 7 shows a plot of the
number of days over the standard for the Cape Elizabeth site.
91

-------
1986 MASSACHUSETTS AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TSP/PM 10
The primary annual and the secondary 24 hour NA.AQS were violated at
only one site in Massachusetts; the City Square site in the Charlestowri
section of Boston. Two other sites, the Columbus Avenue site in Boston and
the East Columbus Avenue site in Springfield reported violations to the
secondary 24 hour NAAQS. An exceedence to the secondary standard was
reported in Pittsfield. TSP sites with the highest annual geonetric means
were located in Boston at 1092 of the NAAQS, Holyoke at 67% of the NAAQS,
Lowell at 60% of the NAAQS, Springfield at 71% of the NAAQS, and Worcester
at 64% of the NAAQS. The highest second maximum daily TSP values were
measured in Boston at 1312 of the secondary NAAQS, in Holyoke at 73% of the
NAAQS, in Springfield at 101% of the NAAQS, and in Worcester at 92% of the
NAAQS. The lowest TSP levels were measured at a rural background site in
Warren with levels at 29% of the primary annual, 10% of the primary daily,
and 25% of the secondary daily standards.
A total of eighteen sites were analyzed for five year trends. The
analysis indicated that three sites had a significant upward trend (Boston,
Springfield, Worcester), three sites had significant downward trends (Brock—
ton, Fall River, Medford), and twelve sites had no significant trends. The
majority of the sites indicated positive trends. The large percentage of
sites with no significant trends but positive slopes, suggest that particu-
late levels are leveling off in Massachusetts after several years of signi-
ficant decreases. Figure 2 shows trend lines for Boston and Springfield.
For PM 10 there are eight sites operating in Boston, Lawrence, Spring-
field, Ware and Worcester. No sites are in violation of the new PM 10 stan-
dard.
Lead
Routine monitoring for lead began in 1982 with sites established in
Boston, Lowell, Springfield and Worcester. No violations to the quarterly
lead NAAQS have been reported from the present network to date. Maximum
quarterly lead levels decreased from 1984 and 1985 levels at all sites.
92

-------
The highest Bite in the State was in Springfield with a maximum quarterly
average of 19% of the NAAQS. Maximum quarterly lead levels from other
urban areas in the state ranged from 4% to 13% of the NAAQS.
Co
No exceedeucea to the 1 hour NAAQS were reported for the eight sites
which monitored CO in the State for 1986. Sites in Boston and Springfield
reported violations to the eight—hour NAAQS. One site in Worcester reported
an exceedence at the eight—hour standard. In 1985 no sites reported and
violations or exceedences to NAAQS.
A five year trend analysis was conducted for all eight SO 2 monitoring
sites. Seven sites exhibited significant decreasing trends while the
Worcester site exhibited a nonsignificant increasing trend. Figure 4 de-
picts the five year trend line for the microscale site located at 600
Washington Street in Boston. Neighborhood (suburban) CO levels were 23%
and 73% of the the 1 hàur and 8 hour NAAQS in Boston, and 262 and 492 of
the NAAQS in Springfield. The highest second maximum 1 hour average for
the State in 1986 was measured at the 600 Washington Street site in Boston
and WaS 46% of the one hour NAAQS. The highest second maximum 8 hour
average for the State was measured at two sites in 1986; the 600 Washington
Street site in Boston and the East Columbus Avenue site in Springfield at
112% of the NAAQS.
There were no violations of the NAAQS at any of the seventeen sites
which reported SO 2 data for 1986 in Massachusetts. Maximum SO 2 levels for
Massachusetts on an annual basis were reported in Boston at the Kenmore
Square site at 54% of the the annual NAAQS. Minimum SO 2 levels on an annual
basis were measured in at a suburban site in Worcester at 23% of the NAAQS.
Righest second maximum daily SO 2 levels were reported for Springfield at
42% of the NAAQS, Boston at 39% of the NAAQS, Fall River at 252 of the NAAQS.
93

-------
A total of ten sites were analyzed for five year trends. Significant
downward trends were identified only for two sites located in Boston. Sig-
nificant u ard trends were identified for Springfield and Chelsea. The
remaining sites did not exhibit any significant trends. The trend line for
the Keninore Square site is depicted in Figure 5.
In 1986, eight sites collected NO 2 data in Massachusetts. The maximum
site in the State was located in Kennxre Square, Boston, where the annual
mean was 63% of the NAAQS, a 12% decrease over 1985 levels. At the other
Boston site, the annual mean increased by 6% over 1985 levels. A slight
decrease was reported for Springfield (—3%).
A five year trend analysis was performed on the five sites with suf-
ficient data records. A significant decreasing trend was identif Led for
the Springfield and Lawrence site. No significant long term trenis were
identified for the other two sites analyzed. The Bremart site in oston
showed a significant upward trend.
Q3
As in past years, ozone violations were reported throughout Massa-
chusetts for 1986. Violations were recorded at five (Agawam, Chi ’opee,
Fairhaven, Newburyport and Ware) Out of twelve sites which operated in
1986. Sites in Amherst and Chelsea reported one daily exceedence of the
standard for the year.
Overall, maximum daily ozone levels decreased in 1986 as compared
with 1984 and 1985. The total number of days in excess of the standard for
the sites which operated in both 1984 and 1985, decreased from forty—seven
days in 1984 to thirty—five days in 1985 and to fifteen in 1986.
The maximum daily value for 1986 in Massachusetts was record d in
Fairhaven at 0.151 ppm. The Fairhaven, Newburyport and Ware site; recorded
the most number of days over the standard with three. Figure 7 shows a five
year trend plot for the Fairhaven site.
94

-------
1986 NEW HAMPSHIRE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TSP/PM 1 a
The only site in New Hampshire which reported exceedences to the primary
NAAQS in 1986 was the Berlin, Lancaster Street, trailer site. Violations to
the secondary standard were reported at three sites in Berlin. Exceedenses
were reported in louis and Nashua. For the first time, the Lancaster Street
site did not show a violation to the primary annual standard. The annual
geanetric mean dropped from 87 ug/m 3 in 1984 to 77 in 1985 to 69 in 1986.
The air quality in Berlin is influenced by manufacturing activity at a
local paper mill. The annual geometric means for other areas in New Hamp-
shire were 59% of the standard in Manchester, 49% in Nashua and 61% in
Portsmouth. Background levels in Hollis are 32% of the annual standard.
A five year trend analysis was performed on nineteen TSP sites in New
Hampshire. Of these, eight showed significant long term downward trends,
while the remaining eleven sites showed no significant trends. Last year,
the long term trend analysis indicated that 60% of the sites analyzed were
significantly decreasing. In this year’s analysis less than 42% of the
sites were significantly decreasing. The indication is that TSP levels may
be leveling off in New Hampshire. Figure 2 shows a trend line for the
State House Annex site in Concord.
Four PM 10 sites were operated in New Hampshire in 1981. Three in Berlin
and one in Manchester. None reported any violations to standards.
Lead
There were no lead violations reported in 1986 at the eight sites which
monitor this pollutant in New Hampshire. The highest site——a microscale
site in Concord——reported a maximum quarterly average which was 6% of the
NAAQS. The lowest site in the State, which is located in Hollis, had a
maximum quarterly average of 1% of the standard. Lead levels have decreased
at all sites in 1986 as compared with 1985 levels.

-------
CO
No violations of the 1 hour NAAQS were reported in 1986; however, both
Nashua and Manchester reported violations to the 8 hour NAAQS. A total of
nine violations were monitored in Manchester for 1986 as compared to eleven
violations reported for 1985. The maximum 8 hour level was 61% over the
standard in 1986 compared to the 1985 maximum which was 36% over the stan-
dard. For Manchester, the frequency of violations decreased in 1986 while
the magnitude of the violations increased significantly. In Nashua, the
frequency of violations increased from two violations In 1985 to three in
1986.
The Nashua site was analyzed for long term trends. A significant
downward trend was identified for mean CO levels at this site.
22
No violations to the NAAQS were monitored in 1986. The last violation
measured in New Hampshire occured in 1980 at a site in Berlin. The highest
statewide levels recorded on an annual basis were monitored in Berlin, Man-
chester and Nashua at 30% of the annual NAAQS for 1986. On a short,term
basis, the highest SO 2 levels were monitored in Pembroke with levels at 79%
of the daily NAAQS and 60% of the 3 hour NAAQS.
In general, most areas in New Hampshire had small increases in SO 2
from levels measured in 1985. A five year trend analysis was performed for
thirteen sites. Seven sites were identified with significant decreasing
trends, while one site located in Berlin had significant increasing trends.
Figure 5 shows a downward five year trend line for the Lancaster Street
site in Berlin.
!22
Only one site in Manchester collected NO 2 data in 1986. There was in—
sufficient data to make a comparison with NAAQS, however, levels are low.
96

-------
23
only the Portsmouth site out of the five sites which operated in 1986,
recorded violations of the NAAQS. The highest daily maximum for the State in
1986 was monitored in Portsmouth and was 106Z of the NAAQS. Generally, 1986
ozone levels were similar to those recorded in 1985. Figure 7 shows the
number of days over the standard for the Portsmouth site.
91

-------
1986 RHODE ISLAND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TSP/PM 10
There were no reported violations or exceedences of the primary and
secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in 1986 except for
one exceedence at the Bonanza Bus Terminal in Providence. The highest
geometric mean occurred at the Bonanza Bus Terminal site in Providence.
This is equivalent to 71% of the annual primary MAAQS. This site alsohad
the highest daily average which was 582 of the primary daily NAAQS. The
rural background site located at the University of Rhode Island’s Alton
Jones Campus was 282 of the primary annual NAAQS and 592 of the daily
secondary standard.
TSP levels throughout the State have shown a general decrease from
1982 to 1986. The rural Alton Jones site, at approximately 28% of the pri—
mary annual standard, has shown an increase over 1985 at 27% and 1984 at
25%. The background TSP levels of 1986 are similar to those exhibited in
the last five years.
A five year trend analysis was performed at eleven TSP sites. Of
these, the Newport and East Providence Fire Station sites shoved signi-
ficant downward trends, while nine sites exhibited no significant trend.
Figure 2 shows a typical five year trend line for a site in Providence.
For PM 10 , two sites in Providence and Pawtucket were operated. Both
sites reported levels below standards.
Pb
There were no calender quarter arithmetic means greater than the pri-
mary and secondary NAAQS in 1986, As in 1985, the highest quarterly lead
average occurred at Dyer Street and was 12% of the NAAQS. The second
highest quarterly average also occurred at Dyer Street at 11% of the Stan-
dard. The maximum background level, as measured at the University of Rhode
Island’s Alton Jones campus in Kent County, was 2% of the standard during
the highest quarter. Pb levels have shown a decrease from 1982 to 1986.
98

-------
Co
There were no exceedences of the 1 hour N&AQS in 1986. The microscale
site at Dorrence Street in Providence reported no exceedences of the 8 hour
NAAQSI as compared to two exceedetices in 1985 and five in 1984. At the new
neighborhood site (RI Dept. of Health), one exceedence to the 8 hour standard
was reported. This may have been caused by the operation of stand—by gen-
erators located near the probe.
Figure 4 shows a significant downward trend in the mean CO levels at
Dorrence Street site.
22
No violations of NAAQS were reported in Rhode Island over the past five
years. The highest levels in 1986 occurred in Providence at 51% of the 24
hour primary NAAQS. The second highest values were reported in Pawtucket
at 38% of the 24 hour standard.
A five year trend analysis was performed for four SO 2 sites in Rhode
Island. The Dorrance Street site showed a significant upward trend. All
other sites showed no significant trend. Figure 5 displays the trend line
for a Providence site.
22
The one NO 2 site in Providence reported an annual average of 48% of the
staz ard. This is slightly lower than the 1985 value of 49%. Figure 6
shows a trend analysis displaying a slight upward trend in Rhode Island ’s
NO 2 concentrations.

-------
23
The Kent County site reported three days during which the 1 hour NAAQS
was exceeded, while the Providence site also reported three days. The
highest daily value reported for Kent County was .162 ppm. This is lower
than the 1984 value of .215 ppm slightly higher than and the 1985 value of .154 ppm.
of .154 ppm. The Kent county site has had the greatest number of measured
over the NAAQS for the past four years in Rhode Island. The highest daily value
in Providence was .142 ppm or approximately 18% over the NAAQS. Figure 7 shows
a plot of the number of days over the Kent County site.
100

-------
1986 VERMONT AMBIENT AIR QUALITY SUMMARY
TS/PM 10
In terms of the 24—hour National Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) just one
exceedence of the primary and secondary standards (260 ug/m 3 and 150 ugfm 3 ,
respectively) was observed in Vermont for 1986. This occurred at the Rut-
land site where a value of 278 ug/m 3 was recorded. The next highest value
at this site was 130 ug/m 3 , which is below the secondary NA.AQS, no violation
occurred at this site. Maximum 24—hour TSP levels for the rest of Vermont
were below the NAAQS. The 1986 daily maximums for each of these sites
ranged from 127 ug/m 3 in Barre to 51 ug/m 3 in Randolph.
Mean TSP levels were higher in Rutland and Barre than in Burlington.
Annual geometric means for Rutland and Barre were 73% and 65% of the primary
annual NAAQS while Burlington TSP levels averaged 47% of the standard.
Levels at the remaining sites were all less than 50% of the standard with
the lowest levels measured at the Randolph site at 28% of the standard.
A five year trend analysis was performed on six sites in Vermont.
All sites showed no significant trends although four sites had a negative
slope. Figure 2 shows the decreasing trend line for the Barre TSP site.
For PM 10 , eight sites are being operated. All show attainment.
Lead
Vermont is not required to and does not operate a monitoring network
for lead.
Co
Carbon monoxide is monitored only in Burlington. Maximum levels at
this site were 47% of the one hour NAAQS and 77% of the 8 hour standard.
These levels were higher than 1985 maximums. A five year trend analysis
was performed for this site and showed that mean CO levels increased over
the 1981 through 1985 time period. Although a significant upward trend was
identified, the increase in terms of concentration was small, averaging
0.07 mg/rn 3 per year.
101

-------
Q2
The Burlington site is the only site which monitors SO 2 year round in
Vermont. Levels at this site for 1985 were 19% of the daily NAAQS and 18%
of the annual NAAQS, a decrease over 1985 levels. Monitors in Barre and
Rutland operate from September through April each heating season. Maximum
levels at these two sites were 21% of the daily standard in Barre and 34%
of the daily standard in Rutland. Maximum daily levels for both these
sites increased over 1985. The five year trend line for Burlington is
shown in Figure 5, and indicates a significant downward trend.
22
Vermont initiated monitoring for NO 2 in Burlington during the fourth
quarter of 1985. The arithmetic mean for 1986 is 34% of the annual NAAQS.
23
No violations of the ozone NAAQS were monitored in Vermont for 1986.
The maximum daily values for the year were 0.115 ppm for Bennington and
0.087 ppm for Burlington. Ozone levels have remained relatively stable in
Vermont since 1981 and show attainment.
102

-------
FIVE YEAR TREND — TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES
65
60
cc
40-
35
0 — — — — — — —
30 — — — -
— —
2 —
1982
1084
Legend
U BANGOR
IJ BOSTON
• PROVIDENCE
o BRIDGEPORT
SPRINGFIELD
X HARTFORD
V BARRE VT
LINCOLN ME
0 CONCORD
0
Li
I-
Li
0
Li
a-
0
0
c
U _—
4C1
10 ?
1985
1986

-------
FIVE YEAR TREND — CARBON MONOXIDE
Legend
S • BOSTON
.J PROVIDENCE
• STAMFORD
o N 4SHUA
BURLINGTON VT
4.5-1
.
35
3
Li
I-
Li
0
-
0
Li
0
(fl
l x
0
-J
-J
25-
2-
15-
U
0
•1 I
1982 1°83
1984 1985
- - 1
1986

-------
FIVE YEAR TREND — SULFUR DIOXIDE
40 -
35-

15 -
1982
Legend
• NEW HAVEN
PROVIDENCE
• BOSTON
0 LEWISTON
- BERLIN NH
X BURLINGTON VT
=
C ,’
w
C-)
C—)
Li
a-
0
C-)
198
1c 4

-------
FIVE YEAR TREND — NITROGEN DIOXIDE
Legend
• C. BOSTON
J BOSTON
• NEW HAVEN
o BRIDGEPORT
2 PROVIDENCE
X C HARTFORD
65
60
Li
I-
Li
— 0
0
Li
0
1,,
0
0
(-)
3cx
1982
1985
1983
1984
1986

-------
FIVE YEAR TREND — OZONE
‘50
‘ 40-
z
— Li
t 30-
I-
Li
>
0
C)-)
0
Li
Z 10-
U
2 0
Ot
1982
I
U
Legend
U STRATFORD CT
KENT CT RI - -
• FAIRHAVEN 14*
o PORTS14OUTH NH
\
CAPE ELIZABETH 14E
1933
1984 192E
1986

-------