AiRregs Air Pollution Regulatory Services, Inc. LOUISVIL.L 1 E KY STATE IMPL EMENTATION PL AN BINDER 2 (OF 2) THIS BINDER CONTAINS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATIONS WITH THE SIP SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL HISTORY (Req 7.50 to Reg 8) for Air Programs Branch US. EPA Region IV 345 Courtlarid Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 EPA PC 9R-0472—NASA 1988 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.50. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new liitte manufacturing plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart HH, revised by Fed. Reg. 18080 (1984) is hereby adopted äi d filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart HH, as revised, limits emissions of particulate matter from all new lime manufacturing plants that commenced construction, modificatiOn, or reconstruction after May 3, 1977. A lime manufacturing plant is defined to be any plant which uses a rotary lime kiln to produce lime product from limestone by calcination. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 5. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6—13—79; effective 6—13—79; amended 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 3r3 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “L OSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.51. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW LIQUID WASTE INCINERATORS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY This section is applicable to those facilities disposing of waste solvents, chemicals, or other flammable material by incineration after the effective date of this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Liquid waste” means any material in a liquid form which has no commercial value other than recovery of its recyclable components or has been transferred to a facility for disposal. (b) “Liquid waste incinerator” is a device for incineration of liquid waste. (c) “Exit gas temperature” means the temperature of the products of combustion measured at the end of the incinerator and prior to any air pollution control device. (d) “Residence time” means the time required for the products of combustion to travel from the liquid waste burner to the exit of the incinerator while maintaining the average gas temperature associated with the residence time. (e) “Auxiliary fuel” means natural gas, propane, butane, distillate fuel oil or other fuel free of toxic compounds and containing not more than 0.5% incombustible particulate. (f) “Combustible liquid waste” means any liquid waste with a heat content greater than 10,000 BTU/lb or capable of sustaining combustion in an incinerator without auxiliary fuel. (g) “Partially combustible liquid waste” means any liquid waste with a heat content greater than 5000 BTU/lb and less than 10,000 BTU/lb requiring auxiliary fuel for sustained combustion. (h) “Average gas temperature” is the mean temperature of the products of combustion while in the incinerator and prior to any spray chamber or air pollution control device. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR PARTICULATE MATTER No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause the emissions of particulate matter from a liquid waste incinerator to exceed: (a) 0.2 gr/scf corrected to 12% C02 excluding the contribution of carbon dioxide from auxiliary fuel, or (b) 20% opacity. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” SECTION 4. EQUIPMENT STANDARDS (a) Incineration of partially combustible liquids shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with means of firing sufficient auxiliary fuel to sustain combustion at temperatures as required by this regulation. No auxiliary fuel shall be required for incineration of combustible liquids unless otherwise required by the District. (b) Incineration of liquid wastes with a viscosity of 750 SSU or greater shall be accomplished in a burner equipped with steam or air atomization. (c) Incineration of halogenated liquid wastes shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with a wet scrubber. (d) Incineration of liquid wastes containing inorganic salts shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with a particulate control device of sufficiency to meet the emission standard specified in sections 3 (a) and 3 (b) of this regulation. (e) The incineration shall be capable of maintaining an average gas temperature of 1600 degrees F with a residence time as determined by the District to provide complete combustion of the liquid waste. (f) The incinerator shall be equipped with a fail-safe device designed to interrupt the delivery of liquid waste to the burner in the event of (i) Fire or flame reaching the line delivering waste to the burner, or (ii) Loss of burner flame. (g) The delivery pipe to the liquid waste burner shall be equipped with a flow indicator capable of measuring the maximum demand of the burner. (h) The incinerator shall be equipped with an indicating pyrometer or thermometer to measure the exit gas temperature. SECTION 5. RECORDKEEPING The owner or operator of any liquid waste incinerator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall record the following information: (a) Daily operating hours of liquid waste incinerator (b) Daily log of liquid waste received and specifying: (i) The amount received, (ii) A general description of the waste, 33 $_ ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (iii) The source from whom the waste was received, (iv) A designation of whether the waste contains material toxic to humans. SECTION 6. TIMETABLE FOR COMPLIANCE (a) Compliance with the provisions of section 4 of this regulation shall occur on or before February 1, 1980. (b) Compliance with all other provisions of this regulation shall occur as of the effective date of this regulation. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 6—13—79. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 2-8 61 — ------- PRINTED AUGUST -30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.52. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW FABRIC, VINYL AND PAPER SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY. The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after June 13, 1979. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line for fabric, vinyl or paper. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating including but not limited to: roll, knife, or rotogravure coater. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (C) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to: flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualifies for an exemption according to Section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon(excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface 3&7 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks. (7) “Fabric coating” means the coating of a textile substrate to impart properties that are not initially present, such as strength, stability, water or acid repellancy, or appearance. (8) “Vinyl coating” means the coating of vinyl coated fabrics or vinyl sheets which includes decorative or protective topcoats or printing. (9) “Paper coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of a web of paper, pressure sensitive tapes regardless of substrate, related web coating processes on plastic film such as typewriter ribbons, photographic film, magnetic tape, and decorative coatings on metal foil such as gift wrap and packaging, but does not include the printing of paper. (10) “Knife coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a knife that spreads the coating evenly over the full width of the substrate. (11) “Roll coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of hard rubber or steel rolls. (12) “Rotogravure coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these regulations recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate. (13) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (14) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total input of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organ compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. (15) “Printing” means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging print. Section 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen (15) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factor that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 3. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coatings shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74); (c) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility coating fabric or paper shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compounds content of the coating is less then 0.35 kg/i of coating (2.9 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. (2) Any affected facility coating vinyl shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of the coating is less than 0.45 kg/i of coating (3.8 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. (3) An owner or operator electing to qualify for an extension under this section must achieve final compliance for that 312 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” affected facility by December 1, 1981. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 6—13—79; amended 11—16—83. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 3?O ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.53 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW BEVERAGE CAN SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new beverage can surface coating operations contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart WW, made effective by 48 Fed. Reg. 38737 (1983) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart WW, limits emissions of volatile organic compounds from all new 2 piece beverage can surface coating operations that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after - November 26, 1980. A 2 piece beverage can is defined to be any 2 piece steel or aluminum container in which soft drinks or beer (including malt liquor) are packaged. The standards in the federal regulation represent the best demonstrated technology for the industry. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13-79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2—19-86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 391 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.54. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW METAL COIL SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new metal coil surface coating operations in 40 CFR 60, Subpart TT, published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart TT, limits emissions of volatile organic compounds from all new metal coil surface coating operations that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after January 5, 1981. A metal coil surface coating operation is defined o be any application system used to apply an organic coating to the surface of any continuous metal strip that is packaged in a roll or coil. Compliance can be achieved by any of four approaches for each affected facility. The standards in the federal regulation represent the best demonstrated technology for the industry. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITIONS In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2—19-86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 3?2- ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.55 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW INSULATION OF MAGNET WIRE SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after the effective date of this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means a coating line for insulation of magnet wire. (b) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including, but not limited to, a coating bath. (C) “Coating die” means the device, located between the applicator and the drying oven, which scrapes of f excess coating and leaves a thin film of desired thickness. (d) “Magnet wire” means wire used in such equipment as electrical motors, generators, and transformers which carries an electrical current. (e) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (i) mixing operations; (ii) process storage; (iii) applicators; (iv) drying operations including coating die area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (v) clean up operations; (vi) leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (vii) processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds. (viii) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line. 6d- “3 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (ix) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (f) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and animonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than 0.1 nun Hg at conditions of 20 degrees Celsius and 760 nun Hg. (g) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds, but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to Regulation 7.12. (h) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR VOLLA TILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than 10 percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. COMPLIANCE (a) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the District. (b) Compliance with the standard in section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the District determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the District of the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the District, performance tests as specified by the District shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (c) With the prior approval of the District, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under _ 28 64 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” section 5. (d) Whenever deemed necessary, the District shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in section 5. The following methods of analyses for coatings shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the District determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (i) ASTM D 1644—75 Method A; (ii) ASTM D 1475—60 (74); (iii) ASTM D 2369—73; or (iv) Federal Standard 141a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. EXEMPTIONS Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of section 3 of this regulation if the volatile organic content of the coating is less than 0.20 kilograms per liter of coating (1.7 pounds per gallon), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. Adopted 6—13-79; effective 6—13-79. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.56 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR LEAKS FROM NEW PETROLEUM REFINERY EQUIPMENT SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means each individual component within a petroleum refinery complex that could potentially leak volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere. (b) “Component” means equipment or apparatus which includes, but is not limited to, pumps, compressors, seals, seal oil degassing vents, pipeline valves, flanges and other connections, pressure relief devices, process drains, and open-ended pipes that could potentially leak volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere. (c) A “petroleum refinery complex” means any facility engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel, fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through distillation of petroleum or through redistillation, cracking, rearrangement or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives. (d) “Leak” means the presence of a volatile organic compound concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm when tested in the manner referenced in Section 5. (e) “Gas service” means that the volatile organic compound is gaseous at conditions that prevail in the component during normal operations. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS The owner or operator of an affected facility shall: (a) When any affected facility within the petroleum refinery complex is found to be leaking, repair the leak within 15 days. A component recheck shall be made after repair. If the leak is still present or a new leak is created by the repair, further maintenance shall be performed until the volatile organic compound emission drops below the screening value (10,000 ppm). (b) Any time a valve is located at the end of a pipe or line containing volatile organic compounds, seal the end of the line with a second valve, a blind flange, a plug or a cap. The sealing device may be removed only when a sample is being taken. This requirement does not apply to safety pressure relief valves. SECTION 4. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” The owner or operator shall conduct such monitoring of affected facilities and submit records as specified below: (a) The refinery operator shall perform component monitoring using the method referenced in Section 5 as follows: (i) Monitor with a portable volatile organic compound detection device annually: pump seals, pipeline valves in liquid service, and process drains. (ii) Monitor with a portable volatile organic compound detection device quarterly: compressor valves, pipeline valves in gas service, and pressure relief valves in gas service. (iii) Monitor visually weekly: pump seals. (iv) No individual monitoring is necessary for pressure relief valves in liquid service and pipeline flanges. (b) Pipeline valves and pressure relief valves for gas service shall be marked or noted so that their location is readily obvious to both the refinery operator performing the monitoring and the District. (C) Whenever liquids are observed dripping from a pump seal, the seal shall be checked immediately with a portable detector to determine if a leak of volatile organic compounds is present. Cd) Whenever a relief valve operates and venting to the atmosphere occurs, the operator shall monitor such valve immediately. Pressure relief devices which are tied in to either a flare header or vapor recovery device shall be exempted from the monitoring requirements. (e) When a leak is located, a weather proof and readily visible tag bearing an identification number and the date the leak is located shall be affixed to the leaking component. The location, tag number, date and stream composition of the leak shall also be noted on a survey log. When the leak is repaired, the date of repair and date and instrument reading of a component recheck after maintenance shall be entered in the survey log and the tag discarded. The operator shall retain the survey log for 2 years after the inspection is completed. (f) After quarterly monitoring has been performed, the refinery operator shall submit a report to the District listing all leaks that were located but not repaired within the 15 day limit and a signed statement attesting to the fact that all monitoring has been performed as stipulated in the control plan. Leaks that cannot be repaired within 15 days shall be repaired during the next schedule turnaround, or if unable to be brought into compliance, a variance shall be requested and obtained on an individual basis. SECTION 5. TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES (a) Except as provided for in Regulation 1.04 the test methods as 3? ? ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” defined in Appendix B to “Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment” (OAQPS 1.2-111, U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards) shall be used to determine compliance with the standard prescribed in Section 3 and monitoring requirements in Section 4. (b) The owner or operator may elect to use alternate monitoring methods if it can be demonstrated to the District’s satisfaction that the alternate methods will achieve equivalent control efficiency. SECTION 6. VARIANCES AND MODIFICATION (a) If, after at least 2 complete annual checks, the refinery operator determines that modifications of the monitoring requirements are in order, he may request in writing to the agency that a revision be made. The submittal shall include data that have been developed to justify any modifications in the monitoring schedule. (b) If the District finds an excessive number of leaks during an inspection, or if the refinery operator finds an excessive number of leaks in any given area during scheduled monitoring, the District shall increase the required frequency of operator inspections for that part of the facility. (C) Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information will be considered by the District on a case—by—case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a printing line for packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the ink. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Printing line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure, any inks containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (C) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) printing line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each printing line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each printing line; (1) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate printing line; (j) All units in a machine which has both coating and printing units will be considered as performing a printing operation. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one—tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain inks, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (7) “Printing” means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging printing. (8) “Coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of the web. (9) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (10) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. (11) “Packaging rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into — 2BGd 39 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” packaging products and labels for articles to be sold. (12) “Publication rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, and other types of printed materials. (13) “Flexographic printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastomeric materials. (14) “Rotogravure printing” means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique which involves intaglio or recessed image areas in the form of cells. (15) “Roll printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. (1) No person shall cause, allow or permit an affected facility for publication rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (2) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for packaging rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than thirty-five (35) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (3) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for flexographic printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than forty (40) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. . .-3-8 6d - ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the inks used at the facility to verify that the inks meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for inks shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60 (74); (c) ASTM D 2369-73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, or Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provision of Section 3 if the printing systems: (1) Utilize a water—borne ink whose volatile portion consists of seventy—five (75) volume percent water and twenty—five (25) volume percent organic solvent (or a lower volatile organic compound content) in all printing units; (2) Achieve a seventy (70) volume percent overall reduction of solvent usage (compared to all solvent-borne ink usage; or (3) Utilize inks which contain sixty (60) percent or more non- volatile material. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5—20-81; effective 5-20-81; amended 4—20-82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 ‘ (of ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.57. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW GRAPHIC ARTS FACILITIES USING ROTOGRAVURE AND FLEXOGRAPHY SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provision of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility that commences construction or modification on or after February 4, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 40]. KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a printing line for packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the ink. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Printing line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure, any inks containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) printing line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each printing line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each printing line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate printing line; (j) All units in a machine which has both coating and printing units will be considered as performing a printing operation. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ainmonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one—tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain inks, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (7) “Printing t ’ means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging printing. (8) “Coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of the web. (9) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (10) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. (11) “Packaging rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into packaging products and labels for articles to be sold. (12) “Publication rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, and other types of printed materials. (13) “Flexographic printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastomeric materials. (14) “Rotogravure printing” means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique which involves intaglio or recessed image areas in the form of cells. (15) “Roll printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. (1) No person shall cause, allow or permit an affected facility for publication rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (2) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for packaging rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than thirty-five (35) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (3) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for flexographic printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than forty (40) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the inks used at the facility to verify that the inks meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for inks shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60 (74) (c) ASTM D 2369-73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, or Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provision of Section 3 if the printing systems: ------- PRINTED AUGUST .30, 1989 ttJ.J SIP3RD (1) Utilize a water-borne ink whose volatile portion consists of seventy-five (75) volume percent water and twenty—five (25) volume percent organic solvent (or a lower volatile organic compound content) in all printing units; (2) Achieve a seventy (70) volume percent overall reduction of solvent usage (compared to all solvent-borne ink usage; or (3) Utilize inks which contain sixty (60) percent or more non- volatile material. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 4—20—82, 11—16—83, 2—19—8 6. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” REGULATION 7.58 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW FACTORY SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS OF FLAT WOOD PANELING SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means a coating line for the factor surface coating of interior flat wood paneling. (b) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating including but not limited to: roll coaters, curtain coaters, sprays and brushes. (C) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (d) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (i) Mixing operations; (ii) Process storage; (iii) Applicators; (iv) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (v) Clean up operation; (vi) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile c rganic compounds; (vii) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (viii) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (ix) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” (e) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to Regulations 7.12 and 6.13. (f) “Interior flat wood paneling” means printed interior wall panels made of hardwood plywood and thin particleboard, natural finish hardwood plywood panels, or hardboard paneling with Class II finishes. (g) “Printed panels’ t means panels whose grain or natural surface is obscured by fillers and basecoats upon which a simulated grain or decorative pattern is printed. (h) “Hardwood plywood’ means plywood surface layer is a veneer of hardwood. (1) “Particleboard” means a manufactured board made of individual wood particles which have been coated with a binder and formed into flat sheets by pressure. Thin particleboard has a thickness of 1/4 inch or less. (j) “Natural finish hardwood plywood panels” means panels whose original grain pattern is enhanced by essentially transparent finishes frequently supplemented by fillers and toners. (k) “Hardboard” means a panel manufactured primarily from inter- felted lignocellulosic fibers which are consolidated under heat and pressure in a hot-press. (1) “Class II hardboard paneling finishes” means finishes which meet the specifications of Voluntary Product Standard PS-59-73, as approved by the American National Standards Institute. (in) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such to permit more than one interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 2a6d ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.3RD” qoY ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REG 7.59 THROUGH REGULATION 8 REGULATION 7.59 STANDARD OF PERFORNANCE FOR NEW MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility that commences construction or modification on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 40]. KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line located at job shops and original equipment manufacturing industries which apply coatings on metal substrates not elsewhere subject to regulation in this chapter. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including but not limited to: dipping, spraying, or flow-coating. (3) “Flashoff area” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (4) “Single coat” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (5) “Prime coat” means the first of two (2) or more films of coating applied in an operation. (6) “Topcoat’ t means the final film or series of films of coating applied in a two (2) coat (or more) operation. (7) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any prime, topcoat or single coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (C) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operation; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating 409 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (8) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (9) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (10) “Miscellaneous metal parts and products” means items including but not limited to: (a) Large farm machinery (harvesting, fertilizing and planting machines, tractors, combines, etc.); (b) Small farm machinery (lawn and garden tractors, lawn mowers, rototillers, etc.); (C) Small appliances (fans, mixers, blenders, crock pots, dehumidifiers, vacuum cleaners, etc.); (d) Commercial machinery (computers and auxiliary equipment, typewriters, calculators, vending machines, etc.); (e) Industrial machinery (pumps, compressors, conveyer components, fans, blowers, transformers, etc.); (f) Fabricated metal products (metal covered doors, frames, etc.); and (g) Any other industrial category not otherwise subject to regulation in this chapter which coats metal parts or products. (11) “Heat sensitive material” means materials which cannot be exposed to temperatures greater than eighty-two (82) to ninety- three (93) 0 C (180° — 200°F). (12) “Air or forced air—dried items” means parts that are too large or too heavy for practical size ovens; parts that are sensitive to heat; parts to which heat sensitive materials are attached; or equipment assembled prior to top coating for specific performance or quality standards. (13) “Outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions” means exposure to any of the following: year round weather conditions, temperatures consistently above ninety-five (95) 0 Celsius, detergents, scouring, solvents, corrosive atmospheres; and similar environmental conditions. (14) “Classification dates” means the effective date of this regulation. (15) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total 410 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen(15) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coating shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74) ; (c) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of coating is: 411 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (a) Less than 0.52 kg/i of coating (4.3 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with clear coat; (b) Less than 0.42 kg/i of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with air or forced air-dried items or items subject to outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions; (C) Less than 0.36 kg/i of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with color coat or first coat or untreated ferrous substrate; or (d) Less than 0.50 kg/i of powder coating (0.4 lb/gal) delivered to applicators associated with no or infrequent color change, or a small number of colors applied. (2) The surface coating of the following metal parts and products are exempt from this regulation: (a) The exterior of airplanes and marine vessels, but not parts for the exterior of airplanes and marine vessels that are coated as a separate manufacturing or coating operation; (b) Automobile refinishing; and (c) Customized top coating of automobiles and trucks, if production is less than thirty-five (35) vehicles per day. (3) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the total volatile organic compound emissions from all affected facilities subject to this regulation are less than or equal to twenty (20) tons per year. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line located at job shops and original equipment manufacturing industries which apply coatings on metal substrates not elsewhere st ject to regulation in this chapter. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including but not limited to: dipping, spraying, or flow-coating. (3) “Flashoff area” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (4) “Single coat” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (5) “Prime coat” means the first of two (2) or more films of coating applied in an operation. 412 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (6) “Topcoat” means the final film or series of films of coating applied in a two (2) coat (or more) operation. (7) “coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any prime, topcoat or single coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (C) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operation; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (8) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammoniumn carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (9) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (10) “Miscellaneous metal parts and products” means items including but not limited to: (a) Large farm machinery (harvesting, fertilizing and planting machines, tractors, combines, etc.); (b) Small farm machinery (lawn and garden tractors, lawn mowers, rototillers, etc.); (c) Small appliances (fans, mixers, blenders, crock pots, dehumidifiers, vacuum cleaners, etc.); (d) Commercial machinery (computers and auxiliary equipment, typewriters, calculators, vending machines, etc.); (e) Industrial machinery (pumps, compressors, conveyer components, fans, blowers, transformers, etc.); (f) Fabricated metal products (metal covered doors, frames, etc.); and 413 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (g) Any other industrial category not otherwise subject to regulation in this chapter which coats metal parts or products. (11) “Heat sensitive material” means materials which cannot be exposed to temperatures greater than eighty-two (82) to ninety- three (93) 0 C (180° — 200°F). (12) “Air or forced air-dried items” means parts that are too large or too heavy for practical size ovens; parts that are sensitive to heat; parts to which heat sensitive materials are attached; or equipment assembled prior to top coating for specific performance or quality standards. (13) “Outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions” means exposure to any of the following: year round weather conditions, temperatures consistently above ninety—five (95) °Celsius, detergents, scouring, solvents, corrosive atmospheres; and similar environmental conditions. (14) “Classification dates” means the effective date of this regulation. (15) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen(15) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the 414 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4T}P’ efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coating shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74); (C) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 14]. a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of coating is: (a) Less than 0.52 kg/l of coating (4.3 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with clear coat; (b) Less than 0.42 kg/l of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with air or forced air-dried items or items subject to outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions; (c) Less than 0.36 kg/i of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with color coat or first coat or untreated ferrous substrate; or (d) Less than 0.50 kg/i of powder coating (0.4 lb/gal)delivered to applicators associated with no or infrequent color change, or a small number of colors applied. (2) The surface coating of the following metal parts and products are exempt from this regulation: (a) The exterior of airplanes and marine vessels, but not parts for the exterior of airplanes and marine vessels that are coated as a separate manufacturing or coating operation; (b) Automobile refinishing; and (C) Customized top coating of automobiles and trucks, if production is less than thirty-five (35) vehicles per day. (3) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the total volatile organic compound emissions from all affected facilities subject to this regulation are less than or equal to twenty (20) tons per year. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. 415 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP. 4TH” Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5-20—81; amended 4—20—82, 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 416 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.60 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW SYNTHESIZED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means operations involved in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis, but does not include fermentation, extraction, or formulation and packaging. (2) “Extraction” means the manufacture of botanical and biological products by the extraction of organic compounds from vegetative materials or animal tissues. (3) “Fermentation” means the production and separation of medicinal chemicals such as antibiotics and vitamins from microorganisms. (4) “Formulation and packaging” means the formulation of bulk pharmaceuticals into various dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, injectable solutions, ointments, etc. that can be taken by the patient immediately and in accurate amount. (5) t vo1ati1e organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mimi Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (7) “kPa” means kilopascals. (8) “psi” means pounds per square inch. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. The owner or operator of an affected facility to which this regulation applies shall install, maintain and operate the control equipment and observe at all times the following operating requirements: (1) (a) Each vent from reactors, distillation operations, crystallizers, centrifuges, and vacuum dryers that emit 6.8 kg/day (fifteen (15) lb/day) or more of volatile organic compounds shall be equipped with surface condensers or other methods of control which provide emission reductions equivalent to the use of surface condensers which meet the requirements in paragraph (b) of this subsection. 417 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (b) If surface condensers are used, the condenser outlet gas temperature shall not exceed the following temperatures (degrees Celsius) when condensing volatile organic compounds with the respective minimum vapor pressure (kilopascals). All vapor pressures are measured to twenty (20) degrees Celsius. 1. Negative twenty—five 25)°C; forty (40)kPa (5.8 psi); 2. Negative fifteen (15) C; twenty (20) kPa (2.9 psi); 3. Zero (0)°C; ten (l0)kPa (1.5 psi); 4. Ten (l0)°C: Seven (7) kPa (1.0 psi); and 5. Twenty—five (25)°C, 3.5 kPa (0.5 psi). (2) (a) For air dryers and production equipment exhaust systems that emit 150kg/day (330 lbs/day) or more of volatile organic compounds, emission shall be reduced ninety (90) percent. (b) For air dryers and production equipment exhaust systems that emit less than 150 kg/day (330 lbs/day), emissions shall be reduced to fifteen (15) kg/day (thirty-three(33) lbs/day). (3) (a) For storage tanks storing volatile organic compounds with a vapor pressure greater than twenty-eight (28)kPa(4.1 psi) at twenty (20) 0 C, one(l) liter of displaced vapor shall be allowed to be released to the atmosphere for every ten (10) liters transferred (i.e., a ninety (90) percent effective vapor balance or equivalent) on truck/rail car delivery to all tanks greater than 7,500 L(2,000 gal) capacity except where tanks are equipped with floating roofs, vapor recovery systems, or their equivalent. This requirement does not apply to transfer of volatile organic compounds from one (1) in-plant location to another. (b) For tanks storing volatile organic compounds with a vapor pressure greater than ten (10) kPa (1.5 psi) at twenty (20)°C, pressure/vacuum conservation vents shall be set at plus or minus 0.2 kPa, except where more effective air pollution control is used. (4) All centrifuges containing volatile organic compounds, rotary vacuum filters processing liquid containing volatile organic compounds and any other filters having an exposed liquid surface where the liquids exerting a total volatile organic comgounds vapor pressure of 3.5 kPa (0.5 psi) or more than twenty (20) C. (5) All in-process tanks containing volatile organic compound at any time shall have covers which shall be closed except for short periods when production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access. (6) For liquids containing volatile organic compounds, all leaks in which liquid can be observed to be running or dripping vessels and equipment (for example: pumps, valves, flanges) shall be repaired within fifteen (15) days. A visual recheck shall be made after repair. If the leak is still present or a new leak is created by the repair, further maintenance shall be performed until the volatile organic compound emission drops below the screening value (observed to be running or dripping). Leaks that cannot be repaired within fifteen (15) days shall be repaired during the next scheduled turnaround, or if unable to be brought into 418 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” compliance, a variance shall be requested and obtained on an individual basis. Leak detection/maintenance and repair procedures shall include maintaining a log identifying when the leak occurred and reporting every ninety(90) days those leaks not repaired after fifteen (15) days. The operators shall retain the survey log for two (2) years after the inspection is completed. SECTION 4. Compliance Procedures. Compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. SECTION 5. Monitoring Requirements. When adsorbers, condensers, incinerators or scrubbers are used to achieve compliance, with Section 3, the following monitoring devices shall be an integral part of the control device: (1) For carbon adsorbers, a monitoring device connected to an alarm device, which indicates carbon bed breakthrough; (2) For condensers, a temperature securing device located in the exit gas stream; (3) For incinerators, temperature securing devices located in the combustion chamber for thermal incinerators and in the catalyst pre- heat chamber for catalytic incinerators; and (4) For scrubbers, flow meters for measuring flow rate of scrubbing medium or pressure drop measuring devices indicating back pressure and pressure drop across the scrubber. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5-20-81; amended 4-20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA. by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 419 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.61 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW PNEUMATIC RUBBER TIRE MANUFACTURING PLANTS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means undertread cementers, tread end cementers, bead dip tanks, and green tire spray booths associated with the manufacture of pneumatic rubber tires. (2) “Manufacture of pneumatic rubber tires” means the mass production of pneumatic rubber tires. (3) “Pneumatic rubber tires” means agricultural, airplane, industrial, mobile home, light and medium duty truck, and passenger vehicle tires of bead diameter up to .51 m (twenty (20) in) and cross-sectional dimension up to .33 m (12.8 in). (4) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty(20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (5) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (6) “Water based sprays” means release compounds, sprayed on the inside and outside of green tires, in which solids, water, and emulsifiers have been substituted for organic solvents. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, maintain and operate capture and control equipment to achieve the following: (1) Emissions from undertread cementers, tread and cementers and bead dip tanks shall be reduced by at least seventy-six (76) percent; and (2) Emissions from green tire spray booths shall be reduced by at least eighty-one (81) percent. This requirement is not applicable to green tire spray booths using water based sprays. SECTION 4. Compliance. Compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the 420 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” control device. SECTION 5. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5-20—81; effective 5—20-81; amended 4-20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 42]. ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.62 STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY GAS TURBINES SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new stationary gas turbines contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart GG, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, and as Fed. Reg. 30672 (1984) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart GG, limits emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from all new stationary gas turbines that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after October 3, 1977. All stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load equal to or greater than 10.7 gigajoules per hour, based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired, are subjected to the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA” and “Agency” shall be read as “District” and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 11—16—83, 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 422 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.63 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATING UNITS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after September 18, 1978. This regulation applies to electric utility combined cycles gas turbines that are capable of combusting more than 250 MM BTU/hr heat input of fossil fuel in the steam generator. Only emissions resulting from the combustion of fuels in the affected facility are subject to this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS (1) “Affected facility” means each electric utility steam generating unit that is capable of combusting more than 250 MM BTU/hr heat input of fossil fuel. For an electric utility combined cycle gas turbine the affected facility is that part of the system that is the steam generating unit. The gas turbine is subject to 401 KAR 59:018. (2) “Classification date” means September 19, 1978. (3) “Steam generating unit” means any furnace, boiler, or other device used f or combusting fuel for the purpose of producing steam (including fossil-fuel-fired steam generators associated with combined cycle gas turbines; nuclear steam generators are not included). (4) “Electric utility steam generating unit” means any steam electric generating unit that is constructed for the purpose of supplying more than one-third (1/3) of its potential electric output capacity and more than twenty-five (25) megawatts (MW) electrical output to any utility power distribution system for sale. Any steam supplied to a steam distribution system for the purpose of providing steam to a steam electric generator that would produce electrical energy for sale is also considered in determining the electrical energy output capacity of the affected facility. (5) “Fossil fuel” means natural gas, petroleum, cOal, and any form of solid, liquid or gaseous fuel derived from such material for the purpose of creating useful heat. (6) “Subbituminous coal” means coal that is classified as subbituminous A,B or C according to ASTM D 388-66, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. (7) “Lignite” means coal that is classified as lignite A or B according to ASTM D 388-66. (8) “Coal refuse” means waste products of coal mining, physical coal cleaning, and coal preparation operations (e.g., culm, gob, etc.) containing coal, matrix material, clay and other organic 423 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” and inorganic material. (9) “Potential combustion concentration” means the theoretical emissions (lb/MN BTU heat input) that would result from combustion of a fuel in an uncleaned state (without emission control systems) and; (a) For particulate matter is: 1. 7.0 lb/MM BTU heat input for solid fuel; and 2. 0.17 lb/MM BTU heat input for liquid fuels. (b) For sulfur dioxide is determined as in Section 8(2). (C) For nitrogen oxides is: 1. 0.67 lb/MM BTU heat input for gaseous fuels; 2. 0.72 lb/MN BTU heat input for liquid fuels; and 3. 2.30 lb/MN BTU heat input for solid fuels. (10) “combined cycle gas turbine” means a stationary turbine combustion system where heat from the turbine exhaust gases is recovered by a steam generating unit. (11) “Interconnected” means that two (2) or more electric generating units are electrically tied together by a network of power transmission lines, and other power transmission equipment. (12) “Electric utility company” means the largest interconnected organization, business or governmental entity that generates electric power for sale (e.g., a holding company with operating subsidiary companies). (13) “Principal company” means the electric utility company or companies which own the affected facility. (14) “Neighboring company” means any one (1) of those electric utility companies with one (1) or more electric power interconnections to the principal company and which have geographically adjoining service areas. (15) “Net system capacity” means the sum of the electric generating capability (not necessarily equal to rated capacity) of all electric generating equipment owned b r an electric utility company (including steam generating units, ir cernal combustion engines, gas turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric units and all other electric generating equipment) plus firm contractual purchases that are interconnected to the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (16) “System load” means the entire electric demand of an electric utility company’s service area interconnected with the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system plus firm contractual sales to other electric utility companies. Sales to other electric utility companies (e.g., emergency power) not on a firm contractual basis 424 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” may also be included in the system load when no available system capacity exists in the electric utility company to which the power is supplied for sale. (17) “System emergency reserves” means an amount of electric generating capacity equivalent to the rated capacity of the single largest electric generating unit in the electric utility company (including steam generating units, internal combustion engines, gas turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric units, and all other electric generating equipment) which is interconnected with the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (18) “Available system capacity” means the capacity determined by subtracting the system load and the system emergency reserves from the net system capacity. (19)”Spinning reserve” means the sum of the unutilized net generating capability of all units of the electric utility company that are synchronized to the power distribution system and that are capable of immediately accepting additional load. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (20) “Available purchase power” means the lesser of the following: (a) The sum of available system capacity in all neighboring companies; (b) The sum of the rated capacities of the power interconnection devices between the principal company and all neighboring companies, minus the sum of the electric power load on these interconnections; or (C) The rated capacity of the power transmission lines between the power interconnection devices and the electric generating units (the unit is the principal company that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system and the unit in the neighboring company supplying replacement electrical power) minus the electric power load on these transmission lines. (21) “Spare flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system module” means a separate system of sulfur dioxide emission control equipment capable of treating an amount of flue gas equal to the total amount of the flue gas generated by an affected facility when operated at maximum capacity divided by the total number of nonspare flue gas desulfurization (FG) modules in the system. (22) “Emergency condition” means that period of time when: (a) The electric generation output of an affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system cannot be reduced or electrical output must be increased because: 425 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” 1. All available system capacity in the principal company interconnected with the affected facility is being operated; and 2. All available purchase power interconnected with the affected facility is being obtained; (b) The electric generation demand is being shifted as quickly as possible from an affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system to one (1) or more electrical generating units held in reserve by the principal company or by a neighboring company; or (C) An affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system becomes the only available unit to maintain a part or all of the principal company’s system emergency reserves and the unit is operated in spinning reserve at the lowest practical electric generation load consistent with not causing significant physical damage to the unit. If the unit is operated at a higher load to meet load demand, an emergency condition would not exist unless the conditions under paragraph (a) of this subsection apply. (23) “Electric utility combined cycle gas turbine” means any combined cycle gas turbine used for electric generation that is constructed for the purpose of supplying more than one-third (1/3) of its potential electric output capacity and more than twenty-five (25) megawatts (MW) electrical output to any utility power distribution system for sale. Any steam distribution system that is constructed for the purpose of providing steam to a steam electric generator that would produce electrical power for sale is also considered in determining the electrical energy output capacity of the affected facility. (24) “Potential electrical output capacity” means thirty-three (33) percent of the maximum design heat input capacity of the steam generating unit (e.g., a steam generating unit with a 100 MW or 340 MM BTU/hr fossil-fuel heat input capacity would have a thirty-three (33) MW potential electrical output capacity). For electric utility combined cycle gas turbines the potential electrical output capacity is determined on the basis of the fossil-fuel firing capacity of the steam generator exclusive of the heat input and electrical power contribution by the gas turbine. (25) “Anthracite” means coal that is classified as anthracite according to ASTM D 388-66. (26) “Solid—derived fuel” means any solid, liquid or gaseous fuel derived from solid fuel for the purpose of creating useful heat and includes, but is not limited to, solvent refined coal, liquefied coal and gasified coal. (27) “Twenty-four (24) hour period” means a facility that combusts more than seventy-five (75) percent non-fossil fuel on a quarterly (calendar) heat input basis. (28) “Resource recovery unit” means a facility that combusts more than seventy-five (75) percent non-fossil fuel on a quarterly 426 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (calendar) heat input basis. (29) “Boiler operating day” means a twenty-four (24) hour period during which fossil fuel is combusted in a steam generating heat for the entire twenty-four (24) hours. (30) “NW” means megawatts. (31) “FGD” means fuel gas desulfurization. SECTION 3. Standard for Particulate Matter. (1) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of: (a) 0.03 lb/MN BTU heat input derived from the combustion of solid, liquid or gaseous fuel; (b) One (1) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety-nine (99) percent reduction) when combusting solid fuel; and (C) Thirty (30) percent of potential combustion concentration (seventy (70) percent reduction) when combusting liquid fuel. (2) On and after the date the particulate matter performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility any gases with exhibit greater than twenty (20) percent opacity (six (6) minute average), except for one (1) six (6) minute period per hour of not more than twenty-seven (27) percent opacity. SECTION 4. Standard for Sulfur Dioxide. (1) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which combusts solid fuel or solid-derived fuel, except as provided in subsections (3),(4),(5) or (7) of this section, any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of: (a) 1.20 lb/MN BTU heat input and ten (10) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety(90) percent reduction); or (b) Thirty (30) percent of the potential combustion concentration (seventy(70) percent reduction), when emissions are less than 0.60 lb/MN BTU heat input. (2) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which coinbusts liquid or gaseous fuels (except for 427 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 ‘ t LOSIP.4TH” liquid or gaseous fuels derived from solid fuels and as provided under subsection (7) of this section), any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of: (a) 0.80 lb/MM BTU heat input and ten (10) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety(90) percent reduction); or (b) 100 percent of the potential combustion concentration (zero percent reduction) when emissions are less than 0.20 lb/MN BTU heat input. (3) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which combusts solid solvent refined coal (SRC—1) any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 1.20 lb/MM BTU heat input and fifteen (15) percent of the potential combustion concentration (eighty-five (85) percent reduction) except as provided by subsection (5) of this section. Compliance with the emission limitation is determined on a thirty (30) day rolling average basis and compliance with the percent reduction requirement is determined on a twenty-four (24) hour basis. (4) Sulfur dioxide emissions are limited to 1.20 lb/MN BTU heat input from any affected facility which combusts 100 percent anthracite or is classified as a resource recovery facility. (5) The emission reduction requirements under this section do not apply to any affected facility that is operated under an 502 commercial demonstration permit issued by the U.S. EPA. (6) Compliance with the emission limitation and percent reduction requirements under this section are both determined on a thirty (30) day rolling average basis except as provided under subsection (3) of this section. (7) When different fuels are combusted simultaneously, the applicable standard is determined by proration using the appropriate formula given in Appendix A to this regulation. SECTION 5. Standard for Nitrogen Oxides. (1) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility, except as provided under subsection (3) of this section, any gases which contain nitrogen oxides in excess of the following emissions limits, based on a thirty(30) day rolling average. (a) For coal-derived gaseous fuels: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for all other gaseous fuels: 0.2 lb/MM BTU heat input. (b) For coal-derived liquid fuels: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for shale oil: 0.5 lb/MN BTU heat input; for all other liquid fuels: 0.3 lb/MN BTU heat input. 428 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (C) For coal-derived solid fuels and for subbituminous coal: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for lignite not subject to the 0.8 lb/MN BTU heat input emission limit, for bituminous coal, for anthracite coal and for all other solid fuels: 0.6 lb/MN BTU heat input. Any fuel containing more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight coal refuse is exempt from NO standards and from NO monitoring requirements. (d) For any fuel containing more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight lignite, if the lignite is mined in North Dakota, South Dakota or Montana, and is conibusted in a slag tap furnace: 0.8 lb/MN BTU heat input. (2) The NO reduction requirements are as follows: (a) For gaseous fuels: twenty-five (25) percent reduction of potential combust ion concentration. (b) For liquid fuels: thirty (30) percent reduction of potential combustion concentration. (C) For solid fuels: sixty-five (65) percent reduction of potential combustion concentration. (3) The emission limitations under subsection (1) of this section do not apply to any affected facility which is combusting coal-derived liquid fuel and is operating under a commercial demonstration permit issued by the U.S. EPA. (4) When two (2) or more fuels are combusted simultaneously, the applicable standard is determined by proration using the formula in Appendix B of this regulation. SECTION 6. Compliance Provisions. (1) Compliance with the particulate matter emission limitation under Section (3) (1) (a) constitutes compliance with the percent reduction requirements for particulate matter under Section 3(l)(b) and (c). (2) Compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limitation under Section 5(1) constitutes compliance with the present reduction requirements under Section 5(2). (3) The particulate matter emission standards under Section 3 and the nitrogen oxides emission standards under Section 5 apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. The sulfur dioxide emission standards under Section 4 apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or when both emergency conditions exist and the procedures under subsection (4) of this section are implemented. (4) During emergency conditions in the principal company, an affected facility with a malfunctioning FGD system may be operated if sulfur dioxide emissions are minimized by: (a) Operating all operable FGD system modules, and bringing back into operation any malfunctioned module as soon as repairs are completed; (b) Bypassing flue gases around only those FGD system modules 429 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” that have been taken out of operation because they were incapable of any sulfur dioxide emission reductions or which would have suffered significant physical damage if they had remained in operation; and (C) Designing, constructing, and operating a spare FGD system module for an affected facility larger than 365 MW (1,250 MN BTU/hr) heat input (approximately 125 MW electrical output capacity). The department may require the owner or operator within sixty (60) days of notification to demonstrate spare module capacity. To demonstrate this capability, the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with the appropriate requirements of Sections 4 (1),(2) and (4), for any period of operation lasting from twenty-four (24) hours to thirty (30) days when: 1. Any one (1) FGD module is not operated; 2. The affected facility is operating at the maximum heat input rate; 3. The fuel fired during the twenty-four (24) hour to thirty (30) day period is representative of the type and average sulfur content of fuel used over the typical thirty (30) day period; and 4. The owner or operator has given the department at least thirty (30) days notice of the date and period of time over which the demonstration will be performed. (5) After the initial performance test required by 401 KAR 50:045, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and percentage reduction requirements under Section 4 and the nitrogen oxides emission limitations under Section 5 is based on the average emission rate for thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. A separate performance test is completed at the end of each boiler operating day after the initial performance test, and a new thirty (30) day average emission rate for both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides and a new percent reduction for sulfur dioxide are calculated to show compliance with the standards. (6) For the initial performance test required by 401 KAR 50:045 compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission ]imitations and percent reduction requirements under Section 4 and the nitrogen oxides emission limitation under Section 5 is based on the average emission rates for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and percent reduction for sulfur dioxide for the first thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. The initial performance test is the only test in which at least thirty (30) days prior notice is required unless otherwise specified by the department. The initial performance test is to be scheduled so that the first boiler operating day of the thirty (30) successive boiler operating days is completed within sixty (60) days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial startup of the facility. (7) Compliance is determined by calculating the arithmetic average of all hourly emission rates for SO 2 and NOx for the 430 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, except for data obtained during startup, shutdown,malfunction (NOx only), or emergency conditions (SO 2 only). Compliance with the percentage reduction requirement for SO 2 is determined based on the average inlet and average outlet SO 2 emission rates for the thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. (8) If an owner or operator has not obtained the minimum quantity of emission data as required under Section 7, compliance of the affected facility with the emission requirements under Sections 4 and 5 for the day on which the thirty (30) day period ends may be determined by the department by following the applicable procedures in sections 6.0 and 7.0 of Reference Method 19, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. SECTION 7. Emission monitoring. (1) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring the opacity of emissions discharged to the atmosphere, except where gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. If opacity interference due to water droplets exists in the stack (for example, from the use of a FGD system), the opacity is monitored upstream of the interference (at the inlet to the FGD system). If opacity interference is experienced at all locations (both at the inlet and outlet of the sulfur dioxide control system), alternate parameters indicative of the particulate matter control system’s performance shall be monitored, subject to the approval of the department. (2) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions, except where natural gas is the only fuel combusted as follows: (a) Sulfur dioxide emissions are monitored at both the inlet and outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device. (b) For a facility which qualifies under the provisions of Section 4(4), sulfur dioxide emissions are only monitored as discharged to the atmosphere. (C) An “as fired” fuel monitoring system (upstream of coal pulverizers) meeting the requirements of Reference Method 19 may be used to determine potential sulfur dioxide emissions in place of a continuous sulfur dioxide emission monitor at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device as required under paragraph (a) of this subsection. (3) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring nitrogen oxide emissions discharged into the atmosphere. (4) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring the oxygen or 431 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” carbon dioxide content of the flue gases at each location where sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides emissions are monitored. (5) The continuous monitoring systems under subsections (2) to (4) of this section shall be operated and data shall be recorded during all periods of operation of the affected facility including periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction or emergency conditions, except for continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments. (6) When emission data are not obtained because of continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks and zero span adjustments, emission data will be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by the department or the reference methods as described in subsection (8) of this section to provide emission data for a minimum of eighteen (18) hours in at least twenty-two (22) out of thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. (7) The one (1) hour averages required by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4 are expressed in lbs/MM BTU heat input and are used to calculate the average emission rates under Section 6. The one (1) hour averages are calculated using the data points required by 40]. KAR 59:005, Section 4. At least two (2) data points must be used to calculate the one (1) hour averages. (8) Reference methods filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015 used to supplement continuous monitoring system data to meet the minimum data requirements in subsection (6) of this section will be used as specified below or otherwise approved by the department. (a) Reference Methods 3, 6, and 7 shall be used as applicable. The sampling location is the same as that used for the continuous monitoring system. (b) For Method 6 the minimum sampling time is twenty (20) minutes and the minimum sampling volume is 0.02 dscin (0.71 dscf) for each sample. Samples are taken at approximately sixty (60) minute intervals. Each sample represents a one (1) hour average. (c) For Method 7, samples are taken at approximately thirty (30) minute intervals. The arithmetic average of these two (2) consecutive samples represent a one (1) hour average. (d) For Method 3, the oxygen or carbon dioxide sample is to be taken for each hour when continuous SO 2 and NO data are taken or when Methods 6 and 7 are required. Each sample shall be taken for a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in each hour using the integrated bag method specified in Method 3. Each sample represents a one (1) hour average. (e) For each one (1) hour average, the emissions expressed in lb/MM BTU heat input are determined and used as needed to achieve the minimum data requirements of subsections (6) of this section. (9) The following procedures are used to conduct monitoring system performance evaluations and calibrations checks required by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4. (a) Reference Method 6 or 7, as applicable, is used for 432 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 I LOSIP.4THt conducting performance evaluations of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides continuous monitoring systems. (b) Sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides, as applicable, is used for preparing calibration gas mixtures under Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B to 40 CFR 60. (c) For affected facilities burning only fossil fuel, the span value for a continuous monitoring system for measuring opacity is between sixty (60) and eighty (80) percent and for a continuous monitoring system measuring nitrogen oxides is determined using the formula given in Appendix C of this regulation. (d) All span values computed under subsection (2) (C) of this section for burning combinations of fossil fuels are rounded to the nearest 500 ppm. (e) For affected facilities burning fossil fuel, alone or in combination with non-fossil fuel, the span value of the sulfur dioxide continuous monitoring system at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device is 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential emissions of the fuel fired, and the outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device is fifty (50) percent of maximum estimated hourly potential emissions of the fuel fired. SECTION 8. Compliance Determination Procedures and Methods. (1) The following procedures and reference methods are used to determine compliance with the standards for particulate matter under Section 3. (a) Method 3 is used for gas analysis when applying Method 5 or Method 17. (b) Method 5 is used for determining particulate matter emissions and associated moisture content. Method 17 may be used for stack gas temperatures less than 160 °C (320 °F). Method 9 shall be used for visible emissions. (C) For Methods 5 or 17, Method 1 is used to select the sampling site and the number of traverse sampling points. The sampling time for each run is at least 120 minutes and the minimum sampling volume is 1.7 dscm (sixty (60) dscf) except that smaller sampling times or volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the department. (d) For Method 5, the probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train is set to provide a gas temperature no greater than 160 0 C (320 °F). (e) For determination of particulate emissions, the oxygen or carbon dioxide sample is obtained simultaneously with each run of Methods 5 or 17 by traversing the duct at the same sampling location. Method 1 is used for selection of the number of traverse points except that no more than twelve (12) sample points are required. (f) For each run using Methods 5 or 17, the emission rate expressed in ng/J heat input is determined using the oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements and particulate matter measurements obtained under this section, the dry basis F c factor and the dry basis emission rate calculation procedure contained in Method 19. (g) Prior to the department’s issuance of a particulate matter reference method that does not experience sulfuric acid mist interference problems, particulate matter emissions may be 433 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” sampled prior to a wet FGD system. (2) The following procedures and methods are used to determine compliance with the sulfur dioxide standards under Section 4. (a) Determine the percent of potential combustion concentration (percent PCC) emitted to the atmosphere as follows: 1. Fuel pretreatment (% R f): Determine the percent reduction achieved by any fuel pretreatment using the procedures in Method 19. Calculate the average percent reduction for fuel pretreatment on a quarterly basis using fuel analysis data. The determination of %R f to calculate the percent of potential combustion concentration emitted to the atmosphere is optional For purposes of determining compliance with any percent reduction requirements under Section 4, any reduction in potential So 2 emissions resulting from the following processes may be credited: fuel pretreatment (physical coal cleaning, hydrodesulfurization of fuel oil, etc.), coal pulverization, and bottom and flyash interactions. 2. Sulfur dioxide control system (% R). Determine the percent sulfur dioxide reduction achieved by any sulfur dioxide control system using emission rates measured before and after the control system following the procedures in Method 19; or, a combination of an “as fired” fuel monitor and emission rates measured after the control system following the procedures in Method 19. When an “as fired” fuel monitor is used, the percent reduction is calculated using the average emission rate from the sulfur dioxide control device and the average 50 2 input rate from the “as fired” fuel analysis for thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. 3. Overall percent reduction (% R f): Determine the overall percentage reduction using the results obtained in subparagraph 1. and 2. of this paragraph following the procedures in Method 19. Results are calculated for each thirty (30) day period using the quarterly average percent sulfur reduction determined for fuel pretreatment from the previous quarter and the sulfur dioxide reduction achieved by a sulfur dioxide control system for each thirty (30) day period in the current quarter. 4. Percent emitted (% PCC): Calculate the percent of potential combustion concentration emitted to the atmosphere using the following equation: Percent PCC = 100 - Percent R o. (b) Determine the sulfur dioxide emission rates following the procedures in Method 19. (3) The procedures and methods outlined in Method 19 are used in conjunction with the thirty (30) day nitrogen oxides emission data collected under Section 7 to determine the compliance with the applicable nitrogen oxides standard under Section 5. (4) Electric utility combined cycle gas turbines shall be performance tested for particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides using the procedures of Method 19. The sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emission rates from the gas turbine used in Method 19 calculations are determined when the gas turbine is performance is tested under 401 KAR 59:018. The potential uncontrolled particulate matter emission rate from a 434 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” gas turbine is defined as 0.04 lb/MM BTU heat input. SECTION 9. Reporting Requirements. (1) For sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter emissions, the performance test data from the initial performance test and from the performance evaluation of the continuous monitors, including the transmissoineter, are submitted to the department. (2) For sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides the following information shall be reported to the department for each twenty- four (24) hour period. (a) Calendar date. (b) The average sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission rates, (lb/MM BTU) for each thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, ending with the last thirty (30) day period in the quarter; reasons for non-compliance with the emission standards; and description of corrective actions taken. (C) Percent reduction of the potential combustion concentration of sulfur dioxide for each thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, ending with the last thirty (30) day period in the quarter; reasons for non-compliance with the standard; and description of corrective actions taken. (d) Identification of the boiler operating days for which pollutant or diluent data have not been obtained by an approved method for at least eighteen (18) hours of operation of the facility; justification for not obtaining sufficient data; and description of corrective action taken. (e) Identification of the times when emissions data have been excluded from the calculation of average emission rates because of startup, shutdown, malfunction (NO x only), emergency conditions (SO 2 only), or other reasons, and justification for excluding data for reasons other than startup, shutdown, malfunction, or emergency conditions. (f) Identification of “F” factor used for calculations, method of determination, and type of fuel combusted. (g) Identification of times when hourly averages have been obtained based on manual sampling methods. (h) Identification of the times when the pollutant concentration exceeded full span of the continuous monitoring system. (i) Description of any modifications to the continuous monitoring system which could affect the ability of the continuous monitoring system to comply with Performance Specifications 2 or 3. (3) If the minimum quantity of emission data as required by Section 7 is not obtained for any thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, the following information obtained under the requirements of Section 6(8) is reported to the department for that thirty (30) day period: (a) The number of hourly averages available for outlet emission rates and inlet emission rates as applicable. (b) The standard deviation of hourly averages for outlet 435 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” emission rates and inlet emission rates as applicable. (C) The lower confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the upper confidence limit for the mean inlet emission rate as applicable. (d) The applicable potential combustion concentration. (e) The ratio of the upper confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the allowable emission rate as applicable. (4) If any standards under Section 4 are exceeded during emergency conditions because of control system malfunction, the - owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement: (a) Indicating that emergency conditions existed and requirements under Section 6(4) were met during each period, and (b) Listing the following information: 1. Time periods the emergency condition existed; 2. Electrical output and demand on the owner or operator’s electric utility system and the affected facility; 3. Amount of power purchased from interconnected neighboring utility companies during the emergency period; 4. Percent reduction in emissions achieved; 5. Atmospheric emission rate (lb/MM BTU) of the pollutant discharged; and 6. Actions taken to correct control system malfunction. (5) If fuel pretreatment credit toward the sulfur dioxide emission standard under Section 4 is claimed, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement: (a) Indicating what percentage cleaning credit was taken for the calendar quarter, and whether the credit was determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 8 and Method 19; and (b) Listing the quantity, heat content, and date each pretreated fuel shipment was received during the previous quarter, the name and location of the fuel pretreatment facility, and the total quantity and total heat content of all fuels received at the affected facility during the previous quarter. (6) For any periods of which opacity, sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides emissions data are not available, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement indicating if any changes were made in operation of the emission control system during the period of data unavailability. Operations of the control system and affected facility during periods of data unavailability are to be compared with operation of the control system and affected facility before and following the period of data unavailability. (7) The owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement indicating whether: (a) The required continuous monitoring system calibration, span, and drift checks or other periodic audits have or have not been performed as specified. (b) The data used to show compliance were or were not obtained in accordance with approved methods and procedures of this part 436 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” and are representative of plant performance. (C) The minimum data requirements have or have not been met; or, the minimum data requirements have not been met for errors that were unavoidable. (d) Compliance with the standards has or has not been achieved during the reporting period. (8) For the purposes of the reports required under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4, periods of excess emissions are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds the applicable opacity standards under Section 3(2). Opacity levels in excess of the applicable opacity standard and the date of such excesses are to be submitted to the department each calendar quarter. (9) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall submit the written reports required under this section and 401 KAR 59:005 to the department for every calendar quarter. All quarterly reports shall be postmarked by the thirtieth (30th) day following the end of each calendar quarter. Effective date: January 7, 1981 [ NOTE: AUTHORITY DELEGATED MARCH 26, 1981 SEE 46FR47487 ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1981] THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 437 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX A Determination of Allowable Sulfur Dioxide If emissions of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere are greater than 0.60 lb/MN BTU heat input: E S0 2 = (0.80x + 1.2 y)/100 and P SO 2 = 10 percent If emissions of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere are less than or equal to 0.60 lb/MN BTU heat input: E SO 2 = (.80 x + 1.2y)/100 and P SO 2 = (90 x + 70y)/100 Where: E SO 2 is the prorated sulfur dioxide emission limit lb/MN BTU heat input; P SO 2 is the percentage of potential sulfur dioxide emission allowed (percent reduction required = 100 — P SO 2 ; x is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of liquid or gaseous fuels (excluding solid—derived fuels); y is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of solid fuel (including solid- derived fuels) 438 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX B Determination of Allowable Nitrogen Oxides Emissions E NO 2 = (.20 w + .30 x + .50y + .60z)/100 Where: E NO 2 is the applicable standard for nitrogen oxides when multiple fuels are coinbusted simultaneously (lb/MN BTU heat input); w is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to .20 lb/MN BTU heat input standard; x is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .30 lb/MN BTU heat input standard; y is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .50 lb/MM BTU heat input standard; and z is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .60 lb/MM BTU heat input standard. 439 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX C Determination of Span Value for Nitrogen Oxides (in parts per million) Span Value for Fossil Fuel Nitrogen Oxides Gas 500 Liquid 500 Solid 1,000 Combination 500 (x+y)+l, 0002 Where: x = the fraction of total heat input derived from gaseous fossil fuel; y = the fraction of total heat input derived from liquid fossil fuel; and z = the fraction of total heat input derived from solid fossil fuel. 440 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.64 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW AMNONIUN SULFATE MANUFACTURING UNITS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after February 4, 1980. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS (1) “Affected facility” means each ammoniuin sulfate dryer within an aminonium sulfate manufacturing plant in the caprolactain by- product, synthetic, and coke oven by-product sectors of the ammonium sulfate industry commenced on or after the classification date defined below. (2) “Anunonium sulfate dryer” means a unit or vessel into which ammonium sulfate is charged for the purpose of reducing the moisture content of the product using a heated gas stream. The unit includes foundations, superstructure, material charger systems, exhaust systems, and integral control systems and instrumentation. (3) “Ammonium sulfate feed material streams” means the sulfuric acid feed stream, to the reactor/crystallizer for synthetic and coke oven by-product ammonium sulfate manufacturing plants; and means the total or combined feed streams (the oximation ainmonium sulfate steam and the rearrangement reaction ammonium sulfate steam) to the crystallizer stage, prior to any recycle steams. (4) “Aminonium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ammonium sulfate. (5) “Caprolactani by-product ammonium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ammonium sulfate as a by-product from process streams generated during caprolactam manufacture. (6) “Classification date” means February 4, 1980. (7) “Coke oven by-product ammonium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces aminonium sulfate by reacting sulfuric acid with ammonia recovered as a by-product from the manufacture of coke. (8) “Synthetic ammonium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ammonium sulfate by direct combination of ammonia and sulfuric acid. SECTION 3. Standard for Particulate Matter. On or after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005 is completed, no owner or operator of an ammoniuni sulfate dryer subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere, from any ainmonium sulfate dryer, particulate matter at an emission rate exceeding 0.15 kg of particulate per megagram (Mg) of amn’toniuin sulfate 441 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” produced (0.30 lb of particulate per ton of ammonium sulfate produced) and exhaust gases with greater than fifteen (15) percent opacity. SECTION 4. Monitoring of Operations. (1) The owner or operator of any axniuoniuxn sulfate manufacturing plant subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate flow monitoring devices which can be used to determine the mass flow of ammoniuni sulfate feed material steams to the process. The flow monitoring device shall have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its range. However, if the plant uses weigh scales of the same accuracy to directly measure production rate of ammoniuni sulfate, the use of flow monitoring devices is not required. (2) The owner or operator of any ammoniuni sulfate manufacturing plant subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device which continuously measures and permanently records the total pressure drop across the emission control system The monitoring device shall have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its operating range. SECTION 5. Test Methods and Procedures. (1) Reference methods in Appendix A to 40 CFR 60 filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, except as provided in 401 KAR 50:045, shall be used to determine compliance with Section 3 as follows: (a) Method 5 for the concentration of particulate matter; (b) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; (c) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; (d) Method 3 for gas analysis; and (e) Method 9 for visible emissions. (2) For Method 5, the sampling time for each run shall be at least sixty (60) mm and volume shall be at least 1.5 dscin (fifty—three (53) dscf). (3) For each run, the particulate emission rate E, shall be computed as follows: E = sd X C /1000 (metric units) E = sd x C English units) where: E = The particulate emission rate (kg/hr or lb/br): sd = The average volumetric flow rate (dscm/hr or dscf/hr) as determined by Method 2: and C = The average concentration (g/dscm or lb/dscf) of particulate matter as determined by Method 5. (4) For each run, the rate of amnioniuin sulfate production, P (Mg/hr or tons/hr), shall be determined by direct measurement using product weigh scales or computed from a material balance. If production rate is determined by material balance, the 442 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH tt following equations shall be used. (a) For synthetic and coke oven by-product ammonium sulfate plants, the amnioniun sulfate production rate shall be determined using the following equation: P=AxBxCxZ where: P = Ainmonium sulfate production (Mg/hr or tons/hr) A = Sulfuric acid flow rate to the reactor/crystallizer (1/mm or gal/mm) averaged over the time period taken to conduct the run: B = Acid density (g/cc of lb/ft 3 ) (a function of acid strength and temperature); C = Percent acid strength in decimal form: and Z = Physical constant (Metric units: use 0.0808: English units: use 0.3016). (b) For caprolactam by-product ammoniuin sulfate plants the anunoniuin sulfate production rate shall be determined using the following equation: P=DxExFxZ where: P = Production rate of caprolactant by-product ammonium sulfate (Mg/hr or tons/hr); D = Total combined feed stream flow rate to the ammonium sulfate crystallizer before the point where any recycle streams enter the stream (1/mm or gal/mm) averaged over the time period taken to conduct the test run: E = Density of the process stream solution (g/l or lb/gal); F = Percent mass of amnionium sulfate in the process solution in decimal form; and Z = Physical constan for conversion of time and mass units: 6.0 x 10 for metric units, 0.03 for English units. (5) For each run, the dryer emission rate shall be computed as follows: R = E/P where: R = The dryer emission rate (kg/Mg or lb/ton); E = The particulate emission rate (kg/hr or lb/hr) from subsection (3) of this section; and P = The rate of antmonium sulfate production (Mg/hr or Adopted 4—20-82; effective 4—20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 443 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.41 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY: NEW WET-PROCESS PHOSPHORIC ACID PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new wet-process phosphoric acid plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart T, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart T, limits fluoride emissions from new wet-process phosphoric acid plants which commence construction or modification after October 22, 1974. Sources which have a design capacity of less than or equal to 15 tons per calendar day of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed are exempt from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6—13—76; effective 6—13-76; amended 2-19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 1st Revision: 444 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.42. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY: NEW SUPERPHOSPHORIC ACID PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulations fro new superphosphoric acid plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart U, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulations adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart U, limits fluoride emissions from new superphosphoric acid plants which commence construction or modification after October 22, 1974. Sources which have a design capacity of less than or equal to 15 tons per calendar day of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed are exempt from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District” and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2—19-86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 445 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.43. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY: NEW DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new diammonium phosphate plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart V, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart V 1 limits fluoride emissions from new dianunonium phosphate plants which commence construction or modification after October 22, 1974. Sources which have a design capacity of less than or equal to 15 tons per calendar day of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed are exempt from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District” and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6—13—79; effective 6—13—79; amended 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 446 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.44 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY: NEW TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new triple superphosphate plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart W, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart W, limits fluoride emissions from new triple superphosphate plants which commence construction or modification after October 22, 1974. Sources which have a design capacity of less than or equal to 15 tons per calendar day of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed are exempt from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District” and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2-19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 447 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.45. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY: NEW GRANULAR SUPERPHOSPHATE STORAGE FACILITIES SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The affected facility to which the provisions of this regulation apply is each granular triple superphosphate storage facility. For the purpose of this regulation, the affected facility includes any combination of storage or curing piles, conveyors, elevators, screens and mills, commenced on or after the classification date defined below. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Granular triple superphosphate storage facility” means any facility curing or storage granular triple superphosphate. (b) “Total fluorides” means elemental fluorine and all fluoride compounds as measured by reference methods specified in section 5 of this regulation, or equivalent or alternative methods. (c) “Classification date” means October 22, 1974. (d) “Equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored” means the quantity of phosphorus, expressed as phosphorus pentoxide, being cured or stored in the affected facility. (e) “Fresh granular triple superphosphate” means granular triple superphosphate produced no more than 10 days prior to the date of the performance test. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR FLUORIDES On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by section 4 of Regulation 7.01 is completed, rio owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmospI are from any affected facility any gases which contain total fluorides in excess of 0.25 g/hr/metric ton of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored (.005 lb/hr/ton). SECTION 4. MONITORING OF OPERATIONS (a) The owner or operator of any granular triple superphosphate storage facility subject to the provisions of this regulation shall maintain an accurate account of triple superphosphate in storage to permit the determination of the amount of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored. (b) The owner or operator of any granular triple superphosphate storage facility shall maintain a daily record of total equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored by multiplying the 448 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” percentage of phosphorus pentoxide content, as determined by Section 5(6)(b) times the total mass of granular triple superphosphate stored. (C) The owner or operator of any granular triple superphosphate storage facility subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a monitoring device which continuously measures and permanently records the total pressure drop across the process scrubbing system. The monitoring device shall have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its operating range. SECTION 5. Test Methods and Procedures. (a) The reference methods as defined in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, except as provided for in 401 KAR 50:045, shall be used to determine compliance with the standard prescribed in Section 3 as follows: (i) Reference Method 13A or 13B for the concentration of total fluorides and the associated moisture content; (ii) Reference Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; (iii) Reference Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; and (iv) Reference Method 3 for gas analysis. (b) For Method 13A or 13B, the sampling time for each run shall be at least sixty (60) minutes and the minimum sample volume shall be at least 0.85 dscm (thirty (30) dscf) except that shorter sampling times or smaller volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the department. (C) The air pollution control system for the affected facility shall be constructed so that volumetric flow rates and total fluoride emissions can be accurately determined by applicable test methods and procedures. (4) Except as provided under subsection (5) of this section, all performance tests on granular triple superphosphate storage facilities shall be conducted only when the following quantities of product are being cured or stored in the facility: (a) Total granular triple superphosphate at least ten (10) percent of the amount of triple superphosphate in the building; (b) Fresh granular triple superphosphate at least twenty (20) percent of triple superphosphate in the building. (5) IF the provisions set forth in subsection (4) (b) of this section exceed production capabilities for fresh granular triple superphosphate, the owner or operator shall have at least five (5) days maximum production of fresh granular triple superphosphate in the building during a performance test. (6) Equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored shall be determined as follows: (a) Determine the total mass stored during each run using an accountability system meeting the requirements of Section 4(1). 449 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH ” (b) Calculate the equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored by multiplying the percentage phosphorus pentoxide content, as measured by the spectrophotoinetric molybdovanadophosphate method (AOAC Method 9) times the total mass stored. AOAC Method 9 is published in the “Official Methods of Analysis” of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 11th edition, 1970, pp.11-12, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. Other methods may be approved by the department. (7) For each run, emissions expressed in g/hr/inetric ton of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide stored shall be determined using the equation given in Appendix A of this regulation. Effective Date: June 6, 1979 APPENDIX A DETERMINATION OF EMISSIONS OF TOTAL FLUORIDES E = QQ M Where: E = Emissions of total fluorides in g/metric ton of equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed. C = Concentration of total fluorides in mg/dscin as determined by Reference Method 13A or 13B. Q = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas stream in dscin/hr as determined by Reference Method 2. = Conversion factor for mg to g. M = Equivalent phosphorus pentoxide feed in metric ton/hr as determined by Section 5(4). THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 450 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.46 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW COAL PREPARATION PLANTS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation are applicable to any of the following affected facilities in coal preparation plants which process more than 200 tons per day: thermal dryers, pneumatic coal—cleaning equipment (air tables), coal processing and conveying equipment (including brakers and crushers), coal storage systems, and coal transfer and loading systems, commenced on or after the classification date defined below. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Coal preparation plant” means any facility (excluding underground mining operations) which prepares coal by one (1) or more of the following processes: breaking, crushing, screening, wet or dry cleaning, and thermal drying. (2) “Classification date” means October 24, 1974. (3) “Bituminous coal” means solid fossil fuel classified as bituminous coal by ASTM-D—38—66(72), filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. (4) “Coal” means all solid fossil fuels classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituininous, or lignite by ASTM-D-388-66(72). (5) “Cyclonic flowtl means a spiraling movement of exhaust gases within a duct or stack. (6) “Thermal dryer” means any facility in which the moisture content of bituminous coal is reduced by contact with a heated gas stream which is exhausted to the atmosphere. (7) “Pneumatic coal-cleaning equipment” means any facility which classifies bituminous coal by size or separates bituminous coal from refuse by application of air stream(s). (8) “Coal processing and conveying equipment” means any machinery used to reduce the size of coal or to separate coal from refuse, and the equipment used to convey coal to or remove coal and refuse from the machinery. This includes, but is not limited to, breakers, crushers, screens, and conveyer belts. (9) “Coal storage systems” means any facility used to store coal including open storage piles. (10) “Transfer and loading system” means any facility used to transfer and load coal for shipment. SECTION 3. Standards for Particulate Matter. 451 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (1) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any thermal dryer, gases which: (a) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.070g/dscm (0.031 gr/dscf). (b) Exhibit twenty (20) percent opacity or greater. (2) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any pneumatic coal cleaning equipment, gases which: (a) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.040 g/dscm (0.018 gr/dscf). (b) Exhibit ten (10) percent opacity or greater. (3) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any coal processing and/or conveying equipment, coal storage system, or coal transfer and/or loading system processing coal gases which exhibit twenty (20) percent opacity or greater. SECTION 4. Monitoring of operations. (1) The owner or operator of any thermal dryer shall install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate monitoring devices as follows: (a) A monitoring device for the measurement of the temperature of the gas stream at the exit of the thermal dryer on a continuous basis. The monitoring device is to be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate within plus or minus three (3) o Fahrenheit. (b) For affected facilities that use venturi scrubber emission control equipment: 1. A monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the pressure loss through the venturi construction of the control equipment. The monitoring device is to be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate within plus or minus one (1) inch water gage. 2. A monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the water supply pressure to the control equipment. The monitoring device is to be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate within plus or minus five (5) percent of design water supply pressure. The pressure sensor or tap must be located close to the water discharge point. The department may be consulted for approval of alternative locations. (2) All monitoring devices under subsection (1) of this section are to be recalibrated annually in accordance with procedures under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4(2). 452 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH t ’ SECTION 5. Test Methods and Procedures. (1) The reference methods as defined in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, except as provided in 401 KAR 50:045 and in Section 3, are to be used to determine compliance with the standards prescribed in Section 3 as follows: (a) Reference Method 5 for the concentration of particulate matter and associated moisture content; (b) Reference Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; (c) Reference Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; (d) Reference Method 3 for gas analysis; and (e) Reference Method 9 for visible emissions. (2) For Reference Method 5, the sampling time for each run is at least sixty (60) minutes and the minimum sample volume is 0.85 dscm (thirty (30) dscf) except that shorter sampling times or smaller volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the department. Sampling is not to be started until thirty (30)minutes after startup and is to be terminated before shutdown procedures commence. The owner or operator of the affected facility shall eliminate cyclonic flow during performance tests in a manner acceptable to the department. (3) The owner or operator shall construct the facility so that particulate emissions from thermal dryers or pneumatic coal- cleaning equipment can be accurately determined by applicable test methods and procedures under subsection (1) of this section. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 453 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.47. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW FERROALLOY PRODUCTION FACILITIES SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation are applicable to the following affected facilities commenced on or after the classification date defined below; electric submerged arc furnaces which produce silicon metal, ferrosilicon, calcium silicon, silicomanganese zirconium, ferrochrome silicon, silvery iron, high-carbon ferrochrome, charge chrome, standard ferromanganese, silico- manganese, ferroinanganese silicon, or calcium carbide, and dust- handling equipment. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Electric submerged arc furnace” means any furnace wherein electrical energy is converted to heat energy by transmission of current between electrodes partially submerged in the furnace charge. - (2) “Furnace charge” means any material introduced into the electric submerged arc furnace and may consist of, but is not limited to, ores, slag, carbonaceous material, and limestone. (3) “Product change” means any change in the composition of the furnace charge that would cause the electric submerged arc furnace to become subject to a different mass standard applicable under this regulation. (4) “slag” means the more or less completely fused and vitrified matter separated during the reduction of metal from its ore. (5) “Tapping” means the removal of slag or product from the electric submerged arc furnace under normal operating conditions such as removal of metal under normal pressure and movement by gravity down the spout into the ladle. (6) “Tapping period” means the time duration from initiation of the process of opening the tap hole until plugging of the tap hole is complete. (7) “Furnace cycle” means the time period from completion of a furnace product tap to the completion of the next consecutive product tap. (8) “Tapping station” means that general area where molten product or slag is removed from the electric submerged arc furnace. (9) “Blowing tap” means any tap in which an evolution of gas forces or projects jets of flame or metal sparks beyond the ladle, runner or collection hood. 454 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (lO)”Furnace power input” means the resistive electrical power consumption of an electric submerged arc furnace as measured in kilowatts. (11) “Dust—handling equipment” means any equipment used to handle particulate matter collected by the air pollution control device (and located at or near such device) serving any electric submerged arc furnace subject to this regulation. (12) “Control device” means the air pollution control equipment used to remove particulate matter generated by an electric submerged arc furnace from an effluent gas stream. (13) “Classification date” means October 21, 1974. (14) “Capture system” means the equipment (including hoods, ducts, fans, dampers, etc.) used to capture or transport particulate matter generated by an affected electric submerged arc furnace to the control device. (15) “Standard ferromanganese” means that alloy as defined by ASTM A-99-66(71). (ASTM designations are filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015.) (16) “Silicomanganese” means that alloy as defined by ASTM A—483- 64(74). (17) “Calcium carbide” means material containing seventy (70) to eighty-five (85) percent calcium carbide by weight. (18) “High—carbon ferrochroine” means that alloy as defined by ASTM A-101-73 grades HC1 through HC6. (19) “Charge chrome” means that alloy containing fifty—two (52) to seventy (70) percent by weight chromium, five (5) to eight (8) percent by weight carbon, and three (3) to six (6) percent by weight silicon. (20) “Silvery iron” means any ferrosilicon, as defined by ASTM A— 100—69(74), which contains less than thirty (30) percent silicon. (21) “Ferrochrome silicon” means that alloy as defined in ASTM A- 482—66(71) (22) “Silicomanganese zirconium” means that alloy containing sixty (60) to sixty-five(65) percent by weight silicon, 1.5 to 2.5 percent by weight calcium, five (5) to seven (7) percent by weight manganese, and two (2) to three (3) percent by weight barium. (23) “Calcium silicon” means that alloy as defined by ASTM A-495- 64(70) (24) “Ferrosilicon” means that alloy as defined by ASTM A-100-69 455 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “L OSIP.4TH” grades A,B,C,D,and E which contains fifty (50) or more percent by weight silicon. (25) “Silicon metal” means any silicon alloy containing more than ninety-six (96) percent silicon by weight. (26) “Ferromanganese silicon” means that alloy containing sixty- three (63) to sixty-six (66) percent by weight manganese, twenty- eight (28) to thirty-two (32) percent by weight silicon, and a maximum of 0.08 percent by weight carbon. (27) “Concentrated discharged” means that the outlet from a control device consists of either stacks (one(1) or more) or openings on the device’s top or side which has (have) a total area less than five (5) percent of the corresponding top or side and which has (have) a length of not more than twice the width. (28) “Disperse discharge” means that the outlet from control device consists of opening(s) on the device’s top or side which has (have) a total area exceeding five (5) percent of the corresponding top or side or which have a length more than twice the width. A control device may have both dispersed and concentrated discharges SECTION 3. Standard for Particulate Matter. (1) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any electric submerged arc furnace any gases which: (a) Exit from a control device and contain particulate matter in excess of: 1. 0.45 kg/M W-hr (0.99 lb/MW-hr) while silicon metal, ferrosilicon, calcium silicon, or silicomanganese zirconium is being produced. 2. 0.23 kg/N W-hr (0.51 lb/M W-hr) while high-carbon ferrochrome, charge chrome, standard ferromanganese, silicomanganese, calcium carbide, ferrochromq silicon, ferromanganese silicon, or silvery iron is being produced. (b) Exit from a control device and exhibit an opacity equal to or greater than: 1. Three (3) percent where a control device located in or impacting on a non-attainment area for particulates has dispersed discharge. 2. Fifteen (15) percent for all other control devices. (c) Exit from an electric submerged arc furnace and escape the capture system and are visible without the aid of instruments. The requirements under this paragraph apply only during periods when flow rates are being established under Section 6(4). (d) Escape the capture system at the tapping station and are visible without the aid of all instruments for more than forty (40) percent of each tapping period. There are no limitations on visible emissions under this paragraph when a blowing tap occurs. The requirements under this paragraph apply only during periods 456 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” when flow rates are being established under Section 6(4). (2) on and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any dust- handling equipment any gases which exhibit ten (10) percent opacity or greater. SECTION 4. Standard for Carbon Monoxide. On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any electric submerged arc furnace any gases which contain, on a dry basis, twenty (20) or greater volume percent of carbon monoxide. Combustion of such gases under conditions acceptable to the department constitutes compliance with this section. Acceptable conditions include, but are not limited to, flaring of gases or use of gases as fuel or other processes. SECTION 5. Emission Monitoring. (1) The owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous monitoring system for measurement of the opacity of emissions discharged into an atmosphere from the control device(s) with a concentrated discharge. (2) For the purpose of reports required under 40]. KAR 59:005, Section 3, the owner or operator shall report as excess emissions all six (6) minute periods in which the average opacity is fifteen (15) percent or greater. (3) The owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall submit a written report of any product change to the department. Reports of product changes must be postmarked not later than thirty (30) days after implementation of the product change. SECTION 6. Monitoring of Operations. (1) The owner or operator of any electric submerged arc furnace subject to the provisions of this regulation shall maintain daily records of the following information: (a) Product being produced; (b) Description of constituents of furnace charge, including the quantity, by weight; (C) Time and duration of each tapping period and the identification of material tapped (slag or product); (d) All furnace power input data obtained under subsection (2) of this section; (e) All flow rate data obtained under subsection (3) of this section or all fan motor power consumption and pressure drop data obtained under subsection (5) of all this section. 457 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (2) The owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a device to measure and continuously record the furnace power input. The furnace power input may be measured at the output or input side of the transformer. The device must have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its operating range. (3) The owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, and maintain a monitoring device that continuously measures and records the volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood of the capture system, except as provided under subsection (5) of this section. The owner or operator of an electric submerged arc furnace that is equipped with a water cooled cover which is designed to contain and prevent escape of the generated gas and particulate matter shall monitor only the volumetric flow rate through the capture system for control of emissions from the tapping station. The owner or operator may install the monitoring device(s) in any appropriate location in the exhaust duct such that reproducible flow rate monitoring will result. The flow rate monitoring device must have an accuracy of plus or minus ten (10) percent over its normal operating range and must be calibrated to the manufacturer’s instructions. The department may require the owner or operator to demonstrate the accuracy of the monitoring device relative to Reference Methods 1 and 2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR 60, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. (4) When performance tests are conducted under the provisions of 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, to demonstrate compliance with the standards under Section 3(1)(c) and (d), volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood of the capture system must be determined using the monitoring device required under subsection (3) of this section. The volumetric flow rates must be determined for furnace power input levels at fifty (50) and 100 percent of the nominal rated capacity of the electric submerged arc furnace. At all times the electric submerged arc furnace is operated, the owner or operator shall maintain the volumetric flow rate at or above the appropriate levels for that furnace power input level determined during the most recent performance test. If emissions were due to tapping are captured and ducted separately from emissions of the electric submerged arc furnace, during each tapping period the owner or operator shall maintain the exhaust flow rates through the capture system over the tapping station at or above the levels established during the most recent performance test. Operation at lower flow rates may be considered by the department to be unacceptable operation and maintenance of the affected facility. The owner or operator may request that these flow rates be re-established by conducting new performance tests under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2. (5) The owner or operator may as an alternative to subsection (3) of this section determine the volumetric flow rate through each fan of the capture system from the fan power consumption, pressure drop across the fan and the fan performance curve. Only 458 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” data specific to the operation of the affected electric submerged arc furnace are acceptable for demonstration of compliance with the requirements of this section. The owner or operator shall maintain on file a permanent record of the fan performance curve (prepared for a specific temperature) and shall: (a) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a device to continuously measure and record the power consumption of the fan motor (measured in kilowatts); and (b) Maintain and operate a device to continuously measure and record the pressure drop across the fan. The fan power consumption and pressure drop measurements must be synchronized to allow real time comparisons of the data. The monitoring devices must have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over their normal operating ranges. (6) The volumetric flow rate through each fan of the capture system must be determined from the fan power consumption, fan pressure drop, and fan performance curve specified under subsection (5) of this section, during any performance test standards under Section 3(l)(c) and (d). The owner or operator shall determine the volumetric flow rate at a representative temperature for furnace power input levels of fifty (50) and 100 percent of the nominal rated capacity of the electric submerged arc furnace. At all times the electric submerged arc furnace is operated, the owner or operator shall maintain the fan power consumption and fan pressure drop at levels such that the volumetric flow rate is at or above the levels established during the most established during the most recent performance test. Operation at lower flow rates may be considered by the department to be unacceptable operation and maintenance of the affected facility. The owner or operator may request that these flow rates be re—established by conducting new performance tests under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2. The department may require the owner or operator to verity the fan performance curve by monitoring necessary fan operating parameters and determining the gas volume moved relative to Methods 1 and 2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR 60. (7) All monitoring devices required under subsections (3) and (5) of this section are to be checked for calibration annually in accordance with the procedures under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4(2). SECTION 7. Test Methods and Procedures. (1) The reference methods as defined in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60, except as provided in 401 KAR 50:045, shall be used to determine compliance with the standards prescribed in Sections 3 and 4 as follows: (a) Reference Method 5 for the concentration of particulate matter and the associated moisture content except that the heating systems specified in paragraphs 2.1.2 and 2.1.4 of Reference Method 5 are not to be used when the carbon monoxide content of the gas stream exceeds ten (10) percent by volume, dry basis; (b) Reference Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; 459 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (C) Reference Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; (d) Reference Method 3 for gas analysis, including carbon monoxide; and (e) Reference Method 9 for opacity determination. (2) For Reference Method 5, the sampling time for each run is to include an integral number of furnace cycles. The sampling time for each run must be at least sixty (60) minutes and the minimum sample volume must be 1.8 dscm (sixty-four (64) dscf) when sampling emissions from open electric submerged arc furnaces with wet scrubber control devices, sealed electric submerged arc furnaces. When sampling emissions from other types of installations, the sampling time for each run must be at least 200 minutes and the minimum sample volume must be 5.7 dscm (200 dscf). Shorter sampling times or smaller sampling volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the department. (3) During the performance test, the owner or operator shall record the maximum open hood area (in hoods with segmented or otherwise movable sides) under which the process is expected to be operated and remain in compliance with all standards. Any future operation of the hooding system with open areas in excess of the maximum is not permitted. (4) The owner or operator shall construct the control device so that volumetric flow rates and particulate matter emissions can be accurately determined by applicable test methods and procedures. (5) During any performance test required under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 2, the owner or operator shall not allow gaseous diluents to be added to the effluent gas stream after the fabric in an open pressurized fabric filter collector unless the total gas volume flow from the collector is accurately determined and considered in the determination of emissions. (6) When compliance with Section 4 is to be attained by combusting the gas stream in a flare, the location of the sampling site for particulate matter is to be upstream of the flare. (7) For each run, particulate matter emissions, expressed in k/hr(lb/hr), must be determined for each exhaust stream at which emissions are quantified using the equation given in Appendix A to this regulation. (8) For Method 5, particulate matter emissions from the affected facilities, expressed in kg/MW-hr(lb/MW-hr) must be determined for each run using the equation given in Appendix B to this regulation. Effective date: June 6, 1979 THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JULY 12, 1982 Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg JUN 29, 1979 JUL 12, 1982 47FR30059 460 ------- PRINTED AUGUST• 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX A DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS En = C Q Where: En = Emissions of particulate matter in kg/hr (lb/Hr). C = Concentration of particulate matter in kg/dscm (lb/dscf) as determined by Reference Method 5. Q = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas stream in dscm/hr (dscf/hr) as determined by Reference Method 2. 461 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX B DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FOR METHOD 5 N E= E n= 1 P Where: E = Emissions of particulate from the affected facility in kg/MW-hr (lb/MW-hr). N = Total number of exhaust streams at which emissions are quantified. E = Emission of particulate matter from each exhaust stream in kg/hr (lb/hr), as determined in Section 7(7) of this regulation. P = Average furnace power input during the sampling period, in megawatts as determined according to Section 6(2). THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 462 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.48 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR STEEL PLANTS AND FOUNDRIES NEW ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation apply to the following affected facilities in steel plants and foundries commenced on or after the classification date defined below: electric arc furnaces and/or associated metallurgical equipment located in the same shop as well as associated dust handling equipment. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Electric arc furnace (EAF)” means any furnace that produces molten steel and heats the charge materials with electric arcs from carbon electrodes. Furnaces from which the molten steel is cast into the shape of finished products, such as in a foundry, are affected facilities included within the scope of this definition. Furnaces which, as the primary source of iron, continuously feed pre-reduced ore pellets are not affected facilities within the scope of this definition. (b) “Dust-handling equipment” means any equipment used to handle particulate matter collected by the control device and located at or near the control device for an EAF subject to this regulation. (c) “Control device” means the air pollution control equipment used to remove particulate matter generated by an EAF(s) from the effluent gas stream. (d) “Capture system” means the air pollution control equipment used to remove particulate matter generated by an EAF from the effluent gas stream. (e) “Associated metallurgical equipment” in the shop includes but is not limited to, scrap pre-heaters and degreasers, and equipment for hot metal transfer, charging, lancing, boiling, slagging, and de-slagging, tapping, inoculating, teeming, hot- topping, vacuum de-gassing, continuous casting, etc. (f) “Charge” means the addition of iron and steel scrap or other materials into the top of an electric arc furnace. (g) “Charging period” means the time period commencing at the moment an EAF starts to open and ending either 3 minutes after the EAF roof is returned to its closed position or 6 minutes after commencement of opening of the roof, whichever is longer. (h) “Tap” means the pouring of molten steel from an EAF. (1) “Tapping period” means the time period commencing at the moment an EAF begins to tilt to pour and ending either 3 minutes after an EAF returns to an upright position or 6 minutes after commencing to tilt, whichever is longer. 463 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (j) “Meltdown and refining” means the phase of the steel production cycle when charge material is melted and undesirable elements are removed from the metal. (k) “Meltdown and refining period” means the time period commencing at the termination of the initial charging period and ending at the initiation of the tapping period, excluding any intermediate charging period. (1) “Shop opacity” means the arithmetic average of 24 or more opacity observations of emissions from the shop taken in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 for the applicable time periods. (m) “Heat time” means the period commencing when scrap is charged to an empty EAF and terminating when the EAF tap is completed. (n) “Shop” means the building which houses one or more EAF’s. (o) “Direct shell evaluation system” means any system that maintains a negative pressure within the EAF above the slag or metal and ducts these emissions to the control device. (p) “Concentrated discharge” means that the outlet from a control device consists of either stacks (one or more) or openings on the device’s top or side which have a total area less than 5 percent of the corresponding top or side and which have a length of not more than twice the width. (q) “Dispersed discharge” means that the outlet from a control device consists of opening on the device’s top or side which have a total area exceeding 5 percent of the corresponding top or side which have a length more than twice the width. (r) “Classification date” means October 21, 1974. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR PARTICULATE MATTER (a) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by section 4 of Regulation 7.01 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from an electric arc furnace and associated with metallurgical equipment any gases which: (i) Exit from a control device and contain a particulate matter in excess of 0.0052 grains/dscf (12 mg/dscm); (ii) Exit from a control device and exhibit 3 percent opacity or greater; (iii) Exit from a shop, and due solely to operations of any EAF’s, exhibit greater than two percent shop opacity except: a. Shop opacity greater than zero percent, but less than 20 464 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” percent, may occur during charging period. b. Shop opacity greater than zero percent, but less than 40 percent, may occur during tapping periods. c. Where the capture system is operated such that the roof of the shop is closed during the charge and the tap, and emissions to the atmosphere are prevented until the roof is opened after completion of the charge or tap, the shop opacity standards under subparagraph (iii) of this section shall apply when the roof is opened and shall continue to apply for the length of time defined by the charging and/or tapping periods. (b) Opacity standards under paragraph (a) (iii) of this section shall apply only during periods when flow rates and pressure are being established under section 5 (C) and (f). (c) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by subsection 4 of Regulation 7.01 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from dust- handling equipment any gases which exhibit 10 percent opacity or greater. SECTION 4. EMISSION MONITORING (a) A continuous monitoring system for the measurement of the opacity of emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the control device(s) with a concentrated discharge shall be installed, calibrated, maintained and operated by the owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation. (b) For the purpose of reports under section 5 of Regulation 7.01, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported are defined as all 6 minute periods during which the average opacity is 3 percent or greater. SECTION 5. MONITORING OF OPERATIONS (a) The owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall maintain records daily of the following information: (i) Time and duration of each charge; (ii) Time and duration of each tap; (iii) All flow rate data obtained under paragraph (b) of this section, or equivalent obtained under paragraph (d) of this section; and (iv) All pressure data obtained under paragraph Ce) of this section. (b) Except as provided under paragraph (d) of this section, the owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, and maintain a monitoring device that 465 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” continuously records the volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood. The monitoring device(s) may be installed in any appropriate location in the exhaust duct such that reproducible flow rate monitoring will result. The flow rate monitoring device(s) shall have an accuracy of —+ 10 percent over its normal operating range and shall be calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The District may require the owner or operator to demonstrate the accuracy of the monitoring device(s) relative to Methods 1 and 2 of Appendix A of 40 CFR 60. (c) When the owner or operator of an EAF is required to demonstrate compliance with the standard under subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of section 3 and at any other time the District may require, the volumetric flow rate through each separately ducted hood shall be determined during all periods in which the hood is operated for the purpose of capturing emissions from the EAF using the monitoring device under paragraph (b) of this section. The owner or operator may petition the District for re- establishment of these flow rates whenever the owner or operator can demonstrate to the District’s satisfaction that the EAF operating conditions upon which the flow rates were previously established are no longer applicable. The flow rates determined during the most recent demonstration of compliance shall be maintained (or may be exceeded) at the appropriate level for each applicable period. Operation at lower flow rates may be considered by the District to be unacceptable operation and maintenance of the affected facility. (d) The owner or operator may petition the District to approve any alternative method that will provide a continuous record of operation of each emission capture system. (e) Where emissions during any phase of the heat time are controlled by use of a direct shell evacuation system, the owner or operator shall install, calibrate and maintain a monitoring device that continuously records the pressure in the free space inside the EAF. The pressure shall be recorded as 15 minutes integrated averages. The monitoring device may be installed in in any appropriate location in the EAF such that reproducible results will be obtained. The pressure monitoring device shall have an accuracy of - + 5 mm of water gauge over its normal operating range and shall be calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. (f) When the owner or operator of an EAF is required to demonstrate compliance with the standard under subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of section 3 and at any other time the District may require, the pressure in the free space inside the furnace shall be determined during the meltdown and refining period(s) using the monitoring device under paragraph (e) of this section. The owner or operator may petition the District for re-establishment of the 15 minutes integrated average pressure whenever the owner or operator can demonstrate to the District’s satisfaction that the EAF operating conditions upon which the pressures were previously established are no longer applicable. 466 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 ILOSIP.4THtt The pressure determined during the most recent demonstration of compliance shall be maintained at all times the EAF is operating in a meltdown and refining period, Operating at higher pressure may be considered by the District to be unacceptable operation and maintenance of the affected facility. (g) Where the capture system is designed and operated such that all emissions are captured and ducted to a control device, the owner or operator shall not be subject to the requirements of this section. (h) Where each EAF in a shop has an actual tapping capacity of less than 10 tons, the owner or operator shall not be subject to the requirements of this section. SECTION 6. TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES (a) Reference methods in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60, except as provided for in Regulation 1.04 shall be used to determine compliance with this regulation as follows: (1) Method 5 for concentration of particulate matter and associated moisture content; (ii) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; (iii) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; (iv) Method 3 for gas analysis; and (v) Method 9 for opacity determination. (b) For Method 5, the sampling time for each run shall be at lest 4 hours. When a single EAF is sampled, the sampling time for each run shall also include an integral number of heats. Shorter sampling times, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the District. The minimum sample volume shall be 4.5 dscxn (160 dscf). (C) For the purpose of this regulation, the owner or operator shall conduct the demonstration of compliance with subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of section 3 and furnish the District with a written report of the results of the test. (d) During any performance test required under section 4 of Regulation 7.01, no gaseous diluents may be added to the effluent gas stream after the fabric in any pressurized fabric filter collector, unless the amount of dilution is separately determined and considered in the determination of emissions. (e) When more than one control device serves the EAF(s) being tested, the concentration of particulate matter shall be determined using the equation given in Appendix A of this regulation. (f) Any control device subject to the provisions of this regulation shall be designed and constructed to allow measurement 467 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP. 4TH” of volumetric flow rate and emissions using applicable test methods and procedures. (g) Where emissions from any EAF(s) are combined with emissions from other affected facilities in the same shop and controlled by a common capture system and control device, the owner or operator may use any of the following procedures during a performance test: (i) Base compliance on control of the combined emissions; (ii) Utilize a method acceptable to the District which compensates for the emissions from the other affected facilities; and (iii) Any combination of the criteria of subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of this subsection. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 6—13—79. APPENDIX A TO REGULATION 7.48 DETERMINATION OF CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER [ EQUATION CANNOT BE TYPED] Where: C = concentration of particulate matter in mg/dscxn (gr/dscf) as determined by Method 5 N = total number of control devices tested Q = volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas stream in mg/dscm (dscf/hr) as determined by Method 2 C Qn or Qn = value of the applicable parameter for each control device tested (n). THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 468 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.49. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW GRAIN ELEVATORS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation apply to each affected facility at any grain elevator, or any grain storage elevator, except as provided under section 5 of this regulation. The affected facilities are each truck unloading station, truck loading station, barge and ship unloading station, barge and ship loading station, railcar unloading station, railcar loading station, grain dryer, and all grain handling operations, which commence construction, modification or reconstruction on or after August 3, 1978. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Grain” means corn, wheat, sorghum, rice, rye, oats, barley, or soybeans. (b) “Grain elevator” means any plant or installation at which grain is unloaded, handled, cleaned, dried, stored, and loaded. (c) “Grain terminal elevator” means any grain elevator which has a storage opacity or more of 88,100 cubic meters (2.5 million bushels) except those located at manufacturers of cereals, animal or pet foods, breweries, and livestock feedlots. (d) “Permanent storage capacity” means grain storage capacity which is inside a building, bin, or silo. (e) “Railcar” means railroad hopper car or boxcar. (f) “Grain storage elevator” means any grain elevator at any wheat flour mill, wet corn mill, dry corn mill (human consumption), rice mill, or soybean oil extraction plant which has a permanent grain storage capacity of 32,500 cubic meters (1 million bushels). (g) “Process emission” means the particulate matter which is collected by a capture system. (h) “Fugitive emissions” means the particulate matter which is not collected by the capture system and is released directly into the atmosphere from an affected facility at a grain elevator. (i) “Capture system” means the equipment such as shreds, hoods, ducts, fans, dampers, etc., used to collect particulate matter which is generated by an affected facility at a grain elevator. (j) “Grain unloading station” means that portion of a grain elevator where the grain is transferred from a truck, railcar, barge or ship to a receiving hopper. 469 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (k) “Grain loading station” means that portion of a grain elevator where grain is transferred from the elevator to a truck, railcar, barge, or ship. (1) “Grain handling operations” includes bucket elevators or legs (excluding legs used to unload barges or ships), scale hoppers and surge bins (garners), turn heads, scalpers, cleaners, trippers, the headhouse and other structures. (m) “Column dryer” means any equipment used to reduce the moisture content of grain in which the grain flows from the top to the bottom in one or more continuous packed columns between two perforated metal sheets. (n) “Rack dryer” means any equipment used to reduce moisture content of grain in which grain flows from the top to the bottom in a cascading flow around rows of baffles (racks). (0) “Unloading leg” means a device which includes a bucket-type elevator which is used to remove grain from a barge or ship. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR PARTICULATE MATTER (a) On or after the date on which the performance test required by regulation 7.01 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere: (1) Any gases which exhibit greater than zero percent opacity from any: a. Column dryer with column plate perforations exceeding 2.4 nun diameter (.094 inch) b. Rack dryer in which exhaust gases pass through a screen filter coarser than 50 mesh (ii) Any fugitive emission from: a. Any individual truck unloading station, railcar unloading station, or railcar loading station, which exhibits greater than 5 percent opacity b. Any grain handling operation which exhibits greater than zero percent opacity c. Any truck loading station which exhibits greater than 10 percent opacity d. Any barge of ship loading station which exhibits greater than 20 percent opacity. (b) On and after the date on which the performance test required by regulation 7.01 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged 470 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH t ’ into the atmosphere from any affected facility (except a grain dryer) any process emission which: (i) Contains particulate matter in excess of 0.023 g/dscm (0.01 gr/dscf) (ii) Exhibits greater than zero percent opacity. (c) The owner or operator of any barge or ship unloading station shall operate as follows: (i) The unloading leg shall be enclosed from the top (including the receiving hopper) to the center line of the bottom pulley, and ventilation to a control device shall be maintained on both sides of the leg and the grain receiving hopper. (ii) The total rate of air ventilated shall be at least 32.1 actual cubic meters per cubic meter of grain handling capacity (40 cubic ft. per bushel). (iii) Rather than comply with the requirements of subparagraph (i) and (ii) of this paragraph, the owner or operator may use other methods of emission control if it is demonstrated to the District’s satisfaction that the control would reduce particulate emissions to the same level or less. SECTION 4. TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES (a) Reference methods in appendix A of 40 CFR 60, except as provided for in Regulation 1.04, shall be used to determine compliance with the standards as prescribed in section 3 as follows: (i) Method 5 or Method 17 for concentration of particulate matter and associated moisture content (ii) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses (iii) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rates (iv) Method 3 for gas analysis (v) Method 9 for visible emissions (b) For Method 5 the sampling probe and filter holder shall be operated without heaters. The sampling time for each run shall be at least 60 minutes. The minimum sample volume shall be 1.7 dscm (60 dscf). SECTION 5. MODIFICATIONS The following physical changes, or changes in the methods of operation, shall not by themselves be considered a modification of any existing facility: (a) The addition of gravity loadout spouts to existing grain 471 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LCSIP.4TH” storage or grain transfer bins (b) The installation of automatic grain weighing scales (C) Replacement of motor and drive units propelling existing grain handling equipment (d) The installation of permanent storage capacity with no increase in hourly grain handling capacity. Adopted 7-14-76; effective 8-3-78. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 472 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.50. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new lime manufacturing plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart HH, revised by Fed. Reg. 18080 (1984) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart HH, as revised, limits emissions of particulate matter from all new lime manufacturing plants that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after May 3, 1977. A lime manufacturing plant is defined to be any plant which uses a rotary lime kiln to produce lime product from limestone by calcination. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 5. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13-79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2-19—86. ThIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 473 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.51. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW LIQUID WASTE INCINERATORS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY This section is applicable to those facilities disposing of waste solvents, chemicals, or other flammable material by incineration after the effective date of this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Liquid waste” means any material in a liquid form which has no commercial value other than recovery of its recyclable components or has been transferred to a facility for disposal. (b) “Liquid waste incinerator” is a device for incineration of liquid waste. (c) “Exit gas temperature” means the temperature of the products of combustion measured at the end of the incinerator and prior to any air pollution control device. (d) “Residence time” means the time required for the products of combustion to travel from the liquid waste burner to the exit of the incinerator while maintaining the average gas temperature associated with the residence time. (e) “Auxiliary fuel” means natural gas, propane, butane, distillate fuel oil or other fuel free of toxic compounds and containing not more than 0.5% incombustible particulate. (f) “Combustible liquid waste” means any liquid waste with a heat content greater than 10,000 BTU/lb or capable of sustaining combustion in an incinerator without auxiliary fuel. (g) “Partially combustible liquid waste” means any liquid waste with a heat content greater than 5000 BTTJ/lb,and less than 10,000 BTU/lb requiring auxiliary fuel for sustainea combustion. (h) “Average gas temperature” is the mean temperature of the products of combustion while in the incinerator and prior to any spray chamber or air pollution control device. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR PARTICULATE MATTER No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause the emissions of particulate matter from a liquid waste incinerator to exceed: (a) 0.2 gr/scf corrected to 12% C02 excluding the contribution of carbon dioxide from auxiliary fuel, or (b) 20% opacity. 474 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” SECTION 4. EQUIPMENT STANDARDS (a) Incineration of partially combustible liquids shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with means of firing sufficient auxiliary fuel to sustain combustion at temperatures as required by this regulation. No auxiliary fuel shall be required for incineration of combustible liquids unless otherwise required by the District. (b) Incineration of liquid wastes with a viscosity of 750 SSU or greater shall be accomplished in a burner equipped with steam or air atomization. (c) Incineration of halogenated liquid wastes shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with a wet scrubber. (d) Incineration of liquid wastes containing inorganic salts shall be accomplished in an incinerator equipped with a particulate control device of sufficiency to meet the emission standard specified in sections 3 (a) and 3 (b) of this regulation. (e) The incineration shall be capable of maintaining an average gas temperature of 1600 degrees F with a residence time as determined by the District to provide complete combustion of the liquid waste. (f) The incinerator shall be equipped with a fail—safe device designed to interrupt the delivery of liquid waste to the burner in the event of (i) Fire or flame reaching the line delivering waste to the burner, or (ii) Loss of burner flame. (g) The delivery pipe to the liquid waste burner shall be equipped with a flow indicator capable of measuring the maximum demand of the burner. (h) The incinerator shall be equipped with an indicating pyrometer or thermometer to measure the exit gas temperature. SECTION 5. RECORDKEEPING The owner or operator of any liquid waste incinerator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall record the following information: (a) Daily operating hours of liquid waste incinerator (b) Daily log of liquid waste received and specifying: (i) The amount received, (ii) A general description of the waste, 475 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP4TH” (iii) The source from whom the waste was received, (iv) A designation of whether the waste contains material toxic to humans. SECTION 6. TIMETABLE FOR COMPLIANCE (a) Compliance with the provisions of section 4 of this regulation shall occur on or before February 1, 1980. (b) Compliance with all other provisions of this regulation shall occur as of the effective date of this regulation. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 6-13—79. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 476 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.52. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW FABRIC, VINYL AND PAPER SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY. The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after June 13, 1979. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line for fabric, vinyl or paper. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating including but not limited to: roll, knife, or rotogravure coater. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to: flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualifies for an exemption according to Section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon(excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and aininonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) nun Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface 477 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks. (7) “Fabric coating” means the coating of a textile substrate to impart properties that are not initially present, such as strength, stability, water or acid repellancy, or appearance. (8) “Vinyl coating” means the coating of vinyl coated fabrics or vinyl sheets which includes decorative or protective topcoats or printing. (9) “Paper coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of a web of paper, pressure sensitive tapes regardless of substrate, related web coating processes on plastic film such as typewriter ribbons, photographic film, magnetic tape, and decorative coatings on metal foil such as gift wrap and packaging, but does not include the printing of paper. (10) “Knife coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a knife that spreads the coating evenly over the full width of the substrate. (11) “Roll coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of hard rubber or steel rolls. (12) “Rotogravure coating” means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these regulations recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate. (13) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (14) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total input of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. (15) “Printing” means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging print. Section 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. 478 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen (15) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factor that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 3. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coatings shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74); (C) ASTM D 2369-73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility coating fabric or paper shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compounds content of the coating is less then 0.35 kg/l of coating (2.9 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. (2) Any affected facility coating vinyl shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of the coating is less than 0.45 kg/i of coating (3.8 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. (3) An owner or operator electing to qualify for an extension under this section must achieve final compliance for that 479 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 ‘ t LOSIP.4T1-I” affected facility by December 1, 1981. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 6—13-79; amended 11—16-83. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 480 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.53 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW BEVERAGE CAN SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new beverage can surface coating operations contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart WW, made effective by 48 Fed. Reg. 38737 (1983) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart WW, limits emissions of volatile organic compounds from all new 2 piece beverage can surface coating operations that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after November 26, 1980. A 2 piece beverage can is defined to be any 2 piece steel or aluminum container in which soft drinks or beer (including malt liquor) are packaged. The standards in the federal regulation represent the best demonstrated technology for the industry. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6—13-79; amended 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 481 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.54. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW METAL COIL SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new metal coil surface coating operations in 40 CFR 60, Subpart TT, published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart TT, limits emissions of volatile organic compounds from all new metal coil surface coating operations that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after January 5, 1981. A metal coil surface coating operation is defined to be any application system used to apply an organic coating to the surface of any continuous metal strip that is packaged in a roll or coil. Compliance can be achieved by any of four approaches for each affected facility. The standards in the federal regulation represent the best demonstrated technology for the industry. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITIONS In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6—13—79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2—19-86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 482 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULPJTION 7.55 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW INSULATION OF MAGNET WIRE SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after the effective date of this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means a coating line for insulation of magnet wire. (b) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including, but not limited to, a coating bath. (C) “Coating die” means the device, located between the applicator and the drying oven, which scrapes off excess coating and leaves a thin film of desired thickness. (d) “Magnet wire” means wire used in such equipment as electrical motors, generators, and transformers which carries an electrical current. (e) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (1) mixing operations; (ii) process storage; (iii) applicators; (iv) drying operations including coating die area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (v) clean up operations; (vi) leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (vii) processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds. (viii) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line. 483 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 t ’LOSIP.4TH” (ix) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (f) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and aminonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than 0.1 mm Hg at conditions of 20 degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (g) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings,.volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds, but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to Regulation 7.12. (h) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than 10 percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. COMPLIANCE (a) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the District. (b) Compliance with the standard in section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the District determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the District of the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the District, performance tests as specified by the District shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (c) With the prior approval of the District, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under 484 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” section 5. (d) Whenever deemed necessary, the District shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in section 5. The following methods of analyses for coatings shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the District determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (i) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (ii) ASTM D 1475—60 (74); (iii) ASTM D 2369—73; or (iv) Federal Standard 141a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. EXEMPTIONS Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of section 3 of this regulation if the volatile organic content of the coating is less than 0.20 kilograms per liter of coating (1.7 pounds per gallon), excluding water, delivered to the applicators associated with the coating line. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6—13-79. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JAN 25, 1980. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: JUNE 29, 1979 JAN 25, 1980 45 FR 6092 485 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.56 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR LEAKS FROM NEW PETROLEUM REFINERY EQUIPMENT SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means each individual component within a petroleum refinery complex that could potentially leak volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere. (b) “Component” means equipment or apparatus which includes, but is not limited to, pumps, compressors, seals, seal oil degassing vents, pipeline valves, flanges and other connections, pressure relief devices, process drains, and open-ended pipes that could potentially leak volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere. (c) A “petroleum refinery complex” means any facility engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel, fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through distillation of petroleum or through redistillation, cracking, rearrangement or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives. (d) “Leak” means the presence of a volatile organic compound concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm when tested in the manner referenced in Section 5. (e) “Gas service” means that the volatile organic compound is gaseous at conditions that prevail in the component during normal operations. SECTION 3. STANDARD FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS The owner or operator of an affected faci1it shall: (a) When any affected facility within the petroleum refinery complex is found to be leaking, repair the leak within 15 days. A component recheck shall be made after repair. If the leak is still present or a new leak is created by the repair, further maintenance shall be performed until the volatile organic compound emission drops below the screening value (10,000 ppm). (b) Any time a valve is located at the end of a pipe or line containing volatile organic compounds, seal the end of the line with a second valve, a blind flange, a plug or a cap. The sealing device may be removed only when a sample is being taken. This requirement does not apply to safety pressure relief valves. SECTION 4. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 486 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” The owner or operator shall conduct such monitoring of affected facilities and submit records as specified below: (a) The refinery operator shall perform component monitoring using the method referenced in Section 5 as follows: (i) Monitor with a portable volatile organic compound detection device annually: pump seals, pipeline valves in liquid service, and process drains. (ii) Monitor with a portable volatile organic compound detection device quarterly: compressor valves, pipeline valves in gas service, and pressure relief valves in gas service. (iii) Monitor visually weekly: pump seals. (iv) No individual monitoring is necessary for pressure relief valves in liquid service and pipeline flanges. (b) Pipeline valves and pressure relief valves for gas service shall be marked or noted so that their location is readily obvious to both the refinery operator performing the monitoring and the District. (C) Whenever liquids are observed dripping from a pump seal, the seal shall be checked immediately with a portable detector to determine if a leak of volatile organic compounds is present. (d) Whenever a relief valve operates and venting to the atmosphere occurs, the operator shall monitor such valve immediately. Pressure relief devices which are tied in to either a flare header or vapor recovery device shall be exempted from the monitoring requirements. (e) When a leak is located, a weather proof and readily visible tag bearing an identification number and the date the leak is located shall be affixed to the leaking component. The location, tag number, date and stream composition of the leak shall also be noted on a survey log. When the leak is repaired, the date of repair and date and instrument reading of a component recheck after maintenance shall be entered in the survey log and the tag discarded. The operator shall retain the survey log for 2 years after the inspection is completed. (f) After quarterly monitoring has been performed, the refinery operator shall submit a report to the District listing all leaks that were located but not repaired within the 15 day limit and a signed statement attesting to the fact that all monitoring has been performed as stipulated in the control plan. Leaks that cannot be repaired within 15 days shall be repaired during the next schedule turnaround, or if unable to be brought into compliance, a variance shall be requested and obtained on an individual basis. SECTION 5. TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES (a) Except as provided for in Regulation 1.04 the test methods as 487 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” defined in Appendix B to “Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment” (OAQPS 1.2—111, U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards) shall be used to determine compliance with the standard prescribed in Section 3 and monitoring requirements in Section 4. (b) The owner or operator may elect to use alternate monitoring methods if it can be demonstrated to the District’s satisfaction that the alternate methods will achieve equivalent control efficiency. SECTION 6. VARIANCES AND MODIFICATION (a) If, after at least 2 complete annual checks, the refinery operator determines that modifications of the monitoring requirements are in order, he may request in writing to the agency that a revision be made. The submittal shall include data that have been developed to justify any modifications in the monitoring schedule. (b) If the District finds an excessive number of leaks during an inspection, or if the refinery operator finds an excessive number of leaks in any given area during scheduled monitoring, the District shall increase the required frequency of operator inspections for that part of the facility. (C) Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information will be considered by the District on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a printing line for packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the ink. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Printing line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure, any inks containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; 488 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) printing line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each printing line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each printing line; (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate printing line; (j) All units in a machine which has both coating and printing units will be considered as performing a printing operation. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ainmonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain inks, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 40]. KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (7) “Printing” means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging printing. (8) “Coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of the web. (9) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (10) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation. or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. (11) “Packaging rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into 489 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” packaging products and labels for articles to be sold. (12) “Publication rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, and other types of printed materials. (13) “Flexographic printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastomeric materials. (14) “Rotogravure printing” means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique which involves intaglio or recessed image areas in the form of cells. (15) “Roll printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. (1) No person shall cause, allow or permit an affected facility for publication rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (2) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for packaging rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than thirty-five (35) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (3) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for flexographic printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than forty (40) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. 490 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the inks used at the facility to verify that the inks meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for inks shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60 (74); (c) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, or Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provision of Section 3 if the printing systems: (1) Utilize a water-borne ink whose volatile portion consists of seventy-five (75) volume percent water and twenty—five (25) volume percent organic solvent (or a lower volatile organic compound content) in all printing units; (2) Achieve a seventy (70) volume percent overall reduction of solvent usage (compared to all solvent-borne ink usage; or (3) Utilize inks which contain sixty (60) percent or more non- volatile material. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by—case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5-20-81; effective 5-20-81; amended 4-20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 491 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP..4TH ” REGULATION 7.57. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW GRAPHIC ARTS FACILITIES USING, ROTOGRAVURE AND FLEXOGRAPHY SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provision of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility that commences construction or modification on or after February 4, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a printing line for packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the ink. (3) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (4) “Printing line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure, any inks containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operations; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) printing line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned ,to each printing line of which it is a part proportionally to che throughput of volatile organic compounds it receives from or distributes to each printing line; (1) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate printing line; (j) All units in a machine which has both coating and printing units will be considered as performing a printing operation. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ainmonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. 492 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (6) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain inks, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 40]. KAR 61:050. (7) “Printing” means the formation of words, designs and pictures, usually by a series of application rolls each with only partial coverage. It applies to flexographic and rotogravure processes as applied to publication and packaging printing. (8) “coating” means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of the web. (9) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (10) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. (11) “Packaging rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into packaging products and labels for articles to be sold. (12) “Publication rotogravure printing” means rotogravure printing upon paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, and other types of printed materials. (13) “Flexographic printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastomeric materials. (14) “Rotogravure printing” means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique which involves intaglio or recessed image areas in the form of cells. (15) “Roll printing” means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage. 493 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. (1) No person shall cause, allow or permit an affected facility for publication rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (2) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for packaging rotogravure printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than thirty-five (35) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. (3) No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility for flexographic printing to discharge into the atmosphere more than forty (40) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the inks used at the facility to verify that the inks meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for inks shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644—75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60 (74) (c) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, or Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provision of Section 3 if the printing systems: 494 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (1) Utilize a water-borne ink whose volatile portion consists of seventy—five (75) volume percent water and twenty-five (25) volume percent organic solvent (or a lower volatile organic compound content) in all printing units; (2) Achieve a seventy (70) volume percent overall reduction of solvent usage (compared to all solvent—borne ink usage; or (3) Utilize inks which contain sixty (60) percent or more non- volatile material. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case—by—case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 4—20—82, 11—16—83, 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGU lATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 495 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.58 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW FACTORY SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS OF FLAT WOOD PANELING SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Affected facility” means a coating line for the factor surface coating of interior flat wood paneling. (b) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating including but not limited to: roll coaters, curtain coaters, sprays and brushes. (C) “Flashoff area” means the space between the applicator and the oven. (d) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (i) Mixing operations; (ii) Process storage; (iii) Applicators; (iv) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (v) Clean up operation; (vi) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (vii) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (viii) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (ix) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 5, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. 496 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (e) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to Regulations 7.12 and 6.13. (f) “Interior flat wood paneling” means printed interior wall panels made of hardwood plywood and thin particleboard, natural finish hardwood plywood panels, or hardboard paneling with Class II finishes. (g) “Printed panels” means panels whose grain or natural surface is obscured by fillers and basecoats upon which a simulated grain or decorative pattern is printed. (h) “Hardwood plywood’ means plywood surface layer is a veneer of hardwood. (1) “Particleboard” means a manufactured board made of individual wood particles which have been coated with a binder and formed into flat sheets by pressure. Thin particleboard has a thickness of 1/4 inch or less. (j) “Natural finish hardwood plywood panels” means panels whose original grain pattern is enhanced by essentially transparent finishes frequently supplemented by fillers and toners. (k) “Hardboard” means a panel manufactured primarily from inter- felted lignocellulosic fibers which are consolidated under heat and pressure in a hot—press. (1) “Class II hardboard paneling finishes” means finishes which meet the specifications of Voluntary Product Standard PS-59-73, as approved by the American National Standards Institute. (m) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compounds net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such to permit more than one interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1983. JUNE 9, 3.982 47 FR 25011 497 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.59 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility that commences construction or modification on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line located at job shops and original equipment manufacturing industries which apply coatings on metal substrates not elsewhere subject to regulation in this chapter. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including but not limited to: dipping, spraying, or flow-coating. (3) “Flashoff area” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (4) “single coat” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (5) “Prime coat” means the first of two (2) or more films of coating applied in an operation. (6) “Topcoat” means the final film or series of films of coating applied in a two (2) coat (or more) operation. (7) “Coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any prime, topcoat or single coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operation; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line; 498 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (i) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (8) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (9) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (10) “Miscellaneous metal parts and products” means items including but not limited to: (a) Large farm machinery (harvesting, fertilizing and planting machines, tractors, combines, etc.); (b) Small farm machinery (lawn and garden tractors, lawn mowers, rototillers, etc.); (C) Small appliances (fans, mixers, blenders, crock pots, dehumidifiers, vacuum cleaners, etc.); (d) Commercial machinery (computers and auxiliary equipment, typewriters, calculators, vending machines, etc.); (e) Industrial machinery (pumps, compressors, conveyer components, fans, blowers, transformers, etc.); (f) Fabricated metal products (metal covered doors, frames, etc.); and (g) Any other industrial category not otherwise subject to regulation in this chapter which coats metal parts or products. (11) “Heat sensitive material” means materials which cannot be exposed to temperatures greater than eighty-two (82) to ninety- three (93) 0 C (180° — 200°F). (12) “Air or forced air—dried items” means parts that are too large or too heavy for practical size ovens; parts that are sensitive to heat; parts to which heat sensitive materials are attached; or equipment assembled prior to top coating for specific performance or quality standards. (13) “Outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions” means exposure to any of the following: year round weather conditions, temperatures consistently above ninety-five (95) °Celsius, detergents, scouring, solvents, corrosive atmospheres; and similar environmental conditions. (14) “Classification dates” means the effective date of this regulation. (15) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected 499 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH t ’ facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen(l5) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coating shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74); (C) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of coating is: (a) Less than 0.52 kg/l of coating (4.3 lb/gal), excluding water, 500 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” delivered to applicators associated with clear coat; (b) Less than 0.42 kg/l of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with air or forced air-dried items or items subject to outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions; (C) Less than 0.36 kg/i of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with color coat or first coat or untreated ferrous substrate; or (d) Less than 0.50 kg/l of powder coating (0.4 lb/gal) delivered to applicators associated with no or infrequent color change, or a small number of colors applied. (2) The surface coating of the following metal parts and products are exempt from this regulation: (a) The exterior of airplanes and marine vessels, but not parts for the exterior of airplanes and marine vessels that are coated as a separate manufacturing or coating operation; (b) Automobile refinishing; and (C) Customized top coating of automobiles and trucks, if production is less than thirty-five (35) vehicles per day. (3) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the total volatile organic compound emissions from all affected facilities subject to this regulation are less than or equal to twenty (20) tons per year. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case—by—case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means a coating line located at job shops and original equipment manufacturing industries which apply coatings on metal substrates not elsewhere subject to regulation in this chapter. (2) “Applicator” means the mechanism or device used to apply the coating, including but not limited to: dipping, spraying, or flow-coating. (3) “Flashoff area” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (4) “single coat” means only one (1) film of coating is applied to the metal substrate. (5) “Prime coat” means the first of two (2) or more films of coating applied in an operation. (6) “Topcoat” means the final film or series of films of coating 501 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” applied in a two (2) coat (or more) operation. (7) “coating line” means a series of equipment and/or operations used to apply, dry, or cure any prime, topcoat or single coatings containing volatile organic compounds. This shall include, but is not limited to: (a) Mixing operations; (b) Process storage; (c) Applicators; (d) Drying operations including, but not limited to, flashoff area evaporation, oven drying, baking, curing, and polymerization; (e) Clean up operation; (f) Leaks, spills and disposal of volatile organic compounds; (g) Processing and handling of recovered volatile organic compounds; (h) For the purposes of determining compliance with this regulation, if any equipment or operation could be considered to be a part of more than one (1) coating line, its volatile organic compound emissions shall be assigned to each coating line of which it is a part proportionally to the throughput of volatile organic compound it receives from or distributes to each coating line; (1) If any portion of the series of equipment and/or operations qualify for an exemption according to Section 6, then that portion shall be considered to be a separate coating line. (8) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ammonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (9) “Process storage” means mixing tanks, holding tanks, and other tanks, drums, or other containers which contain surface coatings, volatile organic compounds, or recovered volatile organic compounds; but does not mean storage tanks which are subject to 401 KAR 59:050 or 401 KAR 61:050. (10) “Miscellaneous metal parts and products” means items including but not limited to: (a) Large farm machinery (harvesting, fertilizing and planting machines, tractors, combines, etc.); (b) Small farm machinery (lawn and garden tractors, lawn mowers, rototillers, etc.); (c) Small appliances (fans, mixers, blenders, crock pots, dehumidifiers, vacuum cleaners, etc.); (d) Commercial machinery (computers and auxiliary equipment, typewriters, calculators, vending machines, etc.); (e) Industrial machinery (pumps, compressors, conveyer components, fans, blowers, transformers, etc.); (f) Fabricated metal products (metal covered doors, frames, etc.); and (g) Any other industrial category not otherwise subject to 502 ------- PRINTED AUGUST- 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” regulation in this chapter which coats metal parts or products. (11) “Heat sensitive material” means materials which cannot be exposed to temperatures greater than eighty-two (82) to ninety- three (93) °C (180° — 200°F). (12) “Air or forced air—dried items” means parts that are too large or too heavy for practical size ovens; parts that are sensitive to heat; parts to which heat sensitive materials are attached; or equipment assembled prior to top coating for specific performance or quality standards. (13) “Outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions” means exposure to any of the following: year round weather conditions, temperatures consistently above ninety-five (95) °Celsius, detergents, scouring, solvents, corrosive atmospheres; and similar environmental conditions. (14) “Classification dates” means the effective date of this regulation. (15) “Volatile organic compounds net input” means the total amount of volatile organic compounds input to the affected facility minus the amount of volatile organic compounds that are not emitted into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds that are prevented from being emitted to the atmosphere by the use of control devices shall not be subtracted from the total for the purposes of determining volatile organic compound net input. When the nature of any operation or design of equipment is such as to permit more than one (1) interpretation of this definition, the interpretation that results in the minimum value for allowable emissions shall apply. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. No person shall cause, allow, or permit an affected facility to discharge into the atmosphere more than fifteen(l5) percent by weight of the volatile organic compounds net input into the affected facility. SECTION 4. Compliance. (1) In all cases the design of any control system is subject to approval by the department. (2) Compliance with the standard in Section 3 shall be demonstrated by a material balance except in those cases where the department determines that a material balance is not possible. For those cases where a material balance is not possible, compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. 503 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TW’ (3) With the prior approval of the department, the owner or operator may elect to effect such changes in the affected facility as are necessary to qualify for an exemption under Section 5. (4) Whenever deemed necessary by the department, the department shall obtain samples of the coatings used at an affected facility to verify that the coatings meet the requirements in Section 5. The following methods of analyses, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, for coating shall be used as applicable except in those cases where the department determines that other methods would be more appropriate: (a) ASTM D 1644-75 Method A; (b) ASTM D 1475—60(74); (C) ASTM D 2369—73; or (d) Federal Standard 141 a, Method 4082.1. SECTION 5. Exemptions. (1) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the volatile organic compound content of coating is: (a) Less than 0.52 kg/i of coating (4.3 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with clear coat; (b) Less than 0.42 kg/l of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with air or forced air-dried items or items subject to outdoor or harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions; (C) Less than 0.36 kg/l of coating (3.5 lb/gal), excluding water, delivered to applicators associated with color coat or first coat or untreated ferrous substrate; or (d) Less than 0.50 kg/i of powder coating (0.4 lb/gal) delivered to applicators associated with no or infrequent color change, or a small number of colors applied. (2) The surface coating of the following metal parts and products are exempt from this regulation: (a) The exterior of airplanes and marine vessels, but not parts for the exterior of airplanes and marine vessels ,that are coated as a separate manufacturing or coating operation; (b) Automobile refinishing; and (C) Customized top coating of automobiles and trucks, if production is less than thirty-five (35) vehicles per day. (3) Any affected facility shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 3 if the total volatile organic compound emissions from all affected facilities subject to this regulation are less than or equal to twenty (20) tons per year. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. 504 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 4—20—82, 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 S 505 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.60 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW SYNTHESIZED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means operations involved in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis, but does not include fermentation, extraction, or formulation and packaging. (2) “Extraction” means the manufacture of botanical and biological products by the extraction of organic compounds from vegetative materials or animal tissues. (3) “Fermentation” means the production and separation of medicinal chemicals such as antibiotics and vitamins from microorganisms. (4) “Formulation and packaging” means the formulation of bulk pharmaceuticals into various dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, injectable solutions, ointments, etc. that can be taken by the patient immediately and in accurate amount. (5) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and ainmonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty (20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (6) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (7) “kPa” means kilopascals. (8) “psi” means pounds per square inch. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. The owner or operator of an affected facility to which this regulation applies shall install, maintain and operate the control equipment and observe at all times the following operating requirements: (1) (a) Each vent from reactors, distillation operations, crystallizers, centrifuges, and vacuum dryers that emit 6.8 kg/day (fifteen (15) lb/day) or more of volatile organic compounds shall be equipped with surface condensers or other methods of control which provide emission reductions equivalent to the use of surface condensers which meet the requirements in paragraph (b) of this subsection. 506 ------- PRINTED AUGUST- 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (b) If surface condensers are used, the condenser outlet gas temperature shall not exceed the following temperatures (degrees Celsius) when condensing volatile organic compounds with the respective minimum vapor pressure (kilopascals). All vapor pressures are measured to twenty (20) degrees Celsius. 1. Negative twenty-five ç25)°C; forty (40)kPa (5.8 psi); 2. Negative fifteen (15) C; twenty (20) kPa (2.9 psi); 3. Zero (0)°C; ten (10)kPa (1.5 psi); 4. Ten (10)°C: Seven (7) kPa (1.0 psi); and 5. Twenty—five (25) 0 C, 3.5 kPa (0.5 psi). (2) (a) For air dryers and production equipment exhaust systems that emit 150kg/day (330 lbs/day) or more of volatile organic compounds, emission shall be reduced ninety (90) percent. (b) For air dryers and production equipment exhaust systems that emit less than 150 kg/day (330 lbs/day), emissions shall be reduced to fifteen (15) kg/day (thirty-three(33) lbs/day). (3) (a) For storage tanks storing volatile organic compounds with a vapor pressure greater than twenty-eight (28)kPa(4.1 psi) at twenty (20) 0 C, one(1) liter of displaced vapor shall be allowed to be released to the atmosphere for every ten (10) liters transferred (i.e., a ninety (90) percent effective vapor balance or equivalent) on truck/rail car delivery to all tanks greater than 7,500 L(2,000 gal) capacity except where tanks are equipped with floating roofs, vapor recovery systems, or their equivalent. This requirement does not apply to transfer of volatile organic compounds from one (1) in-plant location to another. (b) For tanks storing volatile organic compounds with a vapor pressure greater than ten (10) kPa (1.5 psi) at twenty (20)°C, pressure/vacuum conservation vents shall be set at plus or minus 0.2 kPa, except where more effective air pollution control is used. (4) All centrifuges containing volatile organic compounds, rotary vacuum filters processing liquid containing volatile organic compounds and any other filters having an exposed liquid surface where the liquids exerting a total volatile organic comgounds vapor pressure of 3.5 kPa (0.5 psi) or more than twenty (20) C. (5) All in-process tanks containing volatile organic compound at any time shall have covers which shall be closed except for short periods when production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access. (6) For liquids containing volatile organic compounds, all leaks in which liquid can be observed to be running or dripping vessels and equipment (for example: pumps, valves, flanges) shall be repaired within fifteen (15) days. A visual recheck shall be made after repair. If the leak is still present or a new leak is created by the repair, further maintenance shall be performed until the volatile organic compound emission drops below the screening value (observed to be running or dripping). Leaks that cannot be repaired within fifteen (15) days shall be repaired during the next scheduled turnaround, or if unable to be brought into 507 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” compliance, a variance shall be requested and obtained on an individual basis. Leak detection/maintenance and repair procedures shall include maintaining a log identifying when the leak occurred and reporting every ninety(90) days those leaks not repaired after fifteen (15) days. The operators shall retain the survey log for two (2) years after the inspection is completed. SECTION 4. Compliance Procedures. Compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency, and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the control device. SECTION 5. Monitoring Requirements. When adsorbers, condensers, incinerators or scrubbers are used to achieve compliance with Section 3, the following monitoring devices shall be an integral part of the control device: (1) For carbon adsorbers, a monitoring device connected to an alarm device, which indicates carbon bed breakthrough; (2) For condensers, a temperature securing device located in the exit gas stream; (3) For incinerators, temperature securing devices located in the combustion chamber for thermal incinerators and in the catalyst pre- heat chamber for catalytic incinerators; and (4) For scrubbers, flow meters for measuring flow rate of scrubbing medium or pressure drop measuring devices indicating back pressure and pressure drop across the scrubber. SECTION 6. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances whicF are unique, to a source. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5-20-81; amended 4—20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 508 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.6]. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW PNEUMATIC RUBBER TIRE MANUFACTURING PLANTS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after May 20, 1981. SECTION 2. Definitions. As used in this regulation, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in 401 KAR 50:010. (1) “Affected facility” means undertread cementers, tread end cementers, bead dip tanks, and green tire spray booths associated with the manufacture of pneumatic rubber tires. (2) “Manufacture of pneumatic rubber tires” means the mass production of pneumatic rubber tires. (3) “Pneumatic rubber tires” means agricultural, airplane, industrial, mobile home, light and medium duty truck, and passenger vehicle tires of bead diameter up to .51 in (twenty (20) in) and cross-sectional dimension up to .33 in (12.8 in). (4) “Volatile organic compounds” means chemical compounds of carbon (excluding methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, and anunonium carbonate) which have a vapor pressure greater than one-tenth (0.1) mm Hg at conditions of twenty(20) degrees Celsius and 760 mm Hg. (5) “Classification date” means the effective date of this regulation. (6) “Water based sprays” means release compounds, sprayed on the inside and outside of green tires, in which solids, water, and emulsifiers have been substituted for organic solvents. SECTION 3. Standard for Volatile Organic Compounds. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, maintain and operate capture and control equipment to achieve the following: (1) Emissions from undertread cemnenters, tread and cementers and bead dip tanks shall be reduced by at least seventy-six (76) percent; and (2) Emissions from green tire spray booths shall be reduced by at least eighty-one (81) percent. This requirement is not applicable to green tire spray booths using water based sprays. SECTION 4. Compliance. Compliance will be determined based upon an engineering analysis by the department of: the control system design, control device efficiency, control system capture efficiency and any other factors that could influence the performance of the system. If so requested by the department, performance tests as specified by the department shall be conducted in order to determine the efficiency of the 509 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” control device. SECTION 5. Variances. Variation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the department on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a source. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 4—20—82. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg:OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 510 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.62 STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY GAS TURBINES SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new stationary gas turbines contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart GG, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, and as Fed. Reg. 30672 (1984) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SU1INARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart GG, limits emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from all new stationary gas turbines that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after October 3, 1977. All stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load equal to or greater than 10.7 gigajoules per hour, based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired, are subjected to the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA” and “Agency” shall be read as “District” and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 5—20—81; effective 5—20—81; amended 11—16—83, 2—19—86. THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 511 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.63 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATING UNITS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after September 18, 1978. This regulation applies to electric utility combined cycles gas turbines that are capable of combusting more than 250 MM BTU/hr heat input of fossil fuel in the steam generator. Only emissions resulting from the combustion of fuels in the affected facility are subject to this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS (1) “Affected facility” means each electric utility steam generating unit that is capable of combusting more than 250 MM BTU/hr heat input of fossil fuel. For an electric utility combined cycle gas turbine the affected facility is that part of the system that is the steam generating unit. The gas turbine is subject to 401 KAR 59:018. (2) “Classification date” means September 19, 1978. (3) “Steam generating unit” means any furnace, boiler, or other device used for combusting fuel for the purpose of producing steam (including fossil-fuel-fired steam generators associated with combined cycle gas turbines; nuclear steam generators are not included). (4) “Electric utility steam generating unit” means any steam electric generating unit that is constructed for the purpose of supplying more than one-third (1/3) of its potential electric output capacity and more than twenty-five (25) megawatts (MW) electrical output to any utility power distribution system for sale. Any steam supplied to a steam distribution system for the purpose of providing steam to a steam electric generator that would produce electrical energy for sale is also considered in determining the electrical energy output capacity of the affected facility. (5) “Fossil fuel” means natural gas, petroleum, coal, and any form of solid, liquid or gaseous fuel derived from such material for the purpose of creating useful heat. (6) “Subbituzninous coal” means coal that is classified as subbituminous A,B or C according to ASTM D 388-66, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. (7) “Lignite” means coal that is classified as lignite A or B according to ASTM D 388-66. (8) “Coal refuse” means waste products of coal mining, physical coal cleaning, and coal preparation operations (e.g., culin, gob, etc.) containing coal, matrix material, clay and other organic 512 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” and inorganic material. (9) “Potential combustion concentration” means the theoretical emissions (lb/MN BTU heat input) that would result from combustion of a fuel in an uncleaned state (without emission control systems) and; (a) For particulate matter is: 1. 7.0 lb/MN BTU heat input for solid fuel; and 2. 0.17 lb/MN BTU heat input for liquid fuels. (b) For sulfur dioxide is determined as in Section 8(2). (c) For nitrogen oxides is: 1. 0.67 lb/MN BTU heat input for gaseous fuels; 2. 0.72 lb/MN BTU heat input for liquid fuels; and 3. 2.30 lb/MN BTU heat input for solid fuels. (10) “combined cycle gas turbine” means a stationary turbine combustion system where heat from the turbine exhaust gases is recovered by a steam generating unit. (11) “Interconnected” means that two (2) or more electric generating units are electrically tied together by a network of power transmission lines, and other power transmission equipment. (12) “Electric utility company” means the largest interconnected organization, business or governmental entity that generates electric power for sale (e.g., a holding company with operating subsidiary companies). (13) “Principal company” means the electric utility company or companies which own the affected facility. (14) “Neighboring company” means any one (1) of those electric utility companies with one (1) or more electric power interconnections to the principal company and which have geographically adjoining service areas. (15) “Net system capacity” means the sum of the electric generating capability (not necessarily equal to rated capacity) of all electric generating equipment owned by an electric utility company (including steam generating units, internal combustion engines, gas turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric units and all other electric generating equipment) plus firm contractual purchases that are interconnected to the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (16) “System load” means the entire electric demand of an electric utility company’s service area interconnected with the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system plus firm contractual sales to other electric utility companies. Sales to other electric utility companies (e.g., emergency power) not on a firm contractual basis 513 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” may also be included in the system load when no available system capacity exists in the electric utility company to which the power is supplied for sale. (17) “System emergency reserves” means an ainountof electric generating capacity equivalent to the rated capacity of the single largest electric generating unit in the electric utility company (including steam generating units, internal combustion engines, gas turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric units, and all other electric generating equipment) which is interconnected with the affected facility that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (18) “Available system capacity” means the capacity determined by subtracting the system load and the system emergency reserves from the net system capacity. (19) “Spinning reserve” means the sum of the unutilized net generating capability of all units of the electric utility company that are synchronized to the power distribution system and that are capable of immediately accepting additional load. The electric generating capability of equipment under multiple ownership is prorated based on ownership unless the proportional entitlement to electric output is otherwise established by contractual arrangement. (20) “Available purchase power” means the lesser of the following: (a) The sum of available system capacity in all neighboring companies; (b) The sum of the rated capacities of the power interconnection devices between the principal company and all neighboring companies, minus the sum of the electric power load on these interconnections; or (C) The rated capacity of the power transmission lines between the power interconnection devices and the electric generating units (the unit is the principal company that has the malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system and the unit in the neighboring company supplying replacement electrical power) minus the electric power load on these transmission lines. (21) “Spare flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system module” means a separate system of sulfur dioxide emission control equipment capable of treating an amount of flue gas equal to the total amount of the flue gas generated by an affected facility when operated at maximum capacity divided by the total number of nonspare flue gas desulfurization (FG) modules in the system. (22) “Emergency condition” means that period of time when: (a) The electric generation output of an affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system cannot be reduced or electrical output must be increased because: 514 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” 1. All available system capacity in the principal company interconnected with the affected facility is being operated; and 2. All available purchase power interconnected with the affected facility is being obtained; (b) The electric generation demand is being shifted as quickly as possible from an affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system to one (1) or more electrical generating units held in reserve by the principal company or by a neighboring company; or (C) An affected facility with a malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system becomes the only available unit to maintain a part or all of the principal company’s system emergency reserves and the unit is operated in spinning reserve at the lowest practical electric generation load consistent with not causing significant physical damage to the unit. If the unit is operated at a higher load to meet load demand, an emergency condition would not exist unless the conditions under paragraph (a) of this subsection apply. (23) “Electric utility combined cycle gas turbine” means any combined cycle gas turbine used for electric generation that is constructed for the purpose of supplying more than one-third (1/3) of its potential electric output capacity and more than twenty-five (25) megawatts (MW) electrical output to any utility power distribution system for sale. Any steam distribution system that is constructed for the purpose of providing steam to a steam electric generator that would produce electrical power for sale is also considered in determining the electrical energy output capacity of the affected facility. (24) “Potential electrical output capacity” means thirty-three (33) percent of the maximum design heat input capacity of the steam generating unit (e.g., a steam generating unit with a 100 MW or 340 MM BTU/hr fossil-fuel heat input capacity would have a thirty-three (33) MW potential electrical output capacity). For electric utility combined cycle gas turbines the potential electrical output capacity is determined on the basis of the fossil-fuel firing capacity of the steam generator exclusive of the heat input and electrical power contribution by the gas turbine. (25) “Anthracite” means coal that is classified as anthracite according to ASTM D 388-66. (26) “Solid—derived fuel” means any solid, liquid or gaseous fuel derived from solid fuel for the purpose of creating useful heat and includes, but is not limited to, solvent refined coal, liquefied coal and gasified coal. (27) “Twenty-four (24) hour period” means a facility that combusts more than seventy-five (75) percent non-fossil fuel on a quarterly (calendar) heat input basis. (28) “Resource recovery unit” means a facility that combusts more than seventy-five (75) percent non—fossil fuel on a quarterly 515 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH ” (calendar) heat input basis. (29) “Boiler operating day” means a twenty-four (24) hour period during which fossil fuel is combusted in a steam generating heat for the entire twenty-four (24) hours. (30) “MW” means megawatts. (31) “FGD” means fuel gas desulfurization. SECTION 3. Standard for Particulate Matter. (1) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of: (a) 0.03 lb/MM BTU heat input derived from the combustion of solid, liquid or gaseous fuel; (b) One (1) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety-nine (99) percent reduction) when combusting solid fuel; and (C) Thirty (30) percent of potential combustion concentration (seventy (70) percent reduction) when combusting liquid fuel. (2) On and after the date the particulate matter performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility any gases with exhibit greater than twenty (20) percent opacity (six (6) minute average), except for one (1) six (6) minute period per hour of not more than twenty—seven (27) percent opacity. SECTION 4. Standard for Sulfur Dioxide. (1) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which combusts solid fuel or solid-derived fuel, except as provided in subsections (3),(4),(5) or (7) of this section, any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of: (a) 1.20 lb/MM BTU heat input and ten (10) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety(90) percent reduction); or (b) Thirty (30) percent of the potential combustion concentration (seventy(70) percent reduction), when emissions are less than 0.60 lb/MM BTU heat input. (2) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which combusts liquid or gaseous fuels (except for 516 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” liquid or gaseous fuels derived from solid fuels and as provided under subsection (7) of this section), any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of: (a) 0.80 lb/MN BTU heat input and ten (10) percent of the potential combustion concentration (ninety(90) percent reduction); or (b) 100 percent of the potential combustion concentration (zero percent reduction) when emissions are less than 0.20 lb/MM BTU heat input. (3) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility which combusts solid solvent refined coal (SRC-1) any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 1.20 lb/MM BTU heat input and fifteen (15) percent of the potential combustion concentration (eighty-five (85) percent reduction) except as provided by subsection (5) of this section. Compliance with the emission limitation is determined on a thirty (30) day rolling average basis and compliance with the percent reduction requirement is determined on a twenty-four (24) hour basis. (4) Sulfur dioxide emissions are limited to 1.20 lb/MN BTU heat input from any affected facility which combusts 100 percent anthracite or is classified as a resource recovery facility. (5) The emission reduction requirements under this section do not apply to any affected facility that is operated under an SO 2 commercial demonstration permit issued by the U.S. EPA. (6) Compliance with the emission limitation and percent reduction requirements under this section are both determined on a thirty (30) day rolling average basis except as provided under subsection (3) of this section. (7) When different fuels are combusted simultaneously, the applicable standard is determined by proration using the appropriate formula given in Appendix A to this regulation. SECTION 5. Standard for Nitrogen Oxides. (1) On and after the date on which the initial performance test required to be conducted by 401 KAR 50:045 is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility, except as provided under subsection (3) of this section, any gases which contain nitrogen oxides in excess of the following emissions limits, based on a thirty(30) day rolling average. (a) For coal-derived gaseous fuels: 0.5 lb/MN BTU heat input; for all other gaseous fuels: 0.2 lb/MN BTU heat input. (b) For coal-derived liquid fuels: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for shale oil: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for all other liquid fuels: 0.3 lb/MM BTU heat input. 517 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (C) For coal-derived solid fuels and for subbituminous coal: 0.5 lb/MM BTU heat input; for lignite not subject to the 0.8 lb/MN BTU heat input emission limit, for bituminous coal, for anthracite coal and for all other solid fuels: 0.6 lb/MN BTU heat input. Any fuel containing more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight coal refuse is exempt from NO standards and from NOx monitoring requirements. (d) For any fuel containing more than twenty-five (25) percent by weight lignite, if the lignite is mined in North Dakota, South Dakota or Montana, and is combusted in a slag tap furnace: 0.8 lb/MN BTU heat input. (2) The NO reduction requirements are as follows: (a) For gaseous fuels: twenty-five (25) percent reduction of potential combustion concentration. (b) For liquid fuels: thirty (30) percent reduction of potential combustion concentration. (C) For solid fuels: sixty-five (65) percent reduction of potential combustion concentration. (3) The emission limitations under subsection (1) of this section do not apply to any affected facility which is combusting coal-derived liquid fuel and is operating under a commercial demonstration permit issued by the U.S. EPA. (4) When two (2) or more fuels are combusted simultaneously, the applicable standard is determined by proration using the formula in Appendix B of this regulation. SECTION 6. Compliance Provisions. (1) Compliance with the particulate matter emission limitation under Section (3) (1) (a) constitutes compliance with the percent reduction requirements for particulate matter under Section 3(1)(b) and (C). (2) Compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limitation under Section 5(1) constitutes compliance with the present reduction requirements under Section 5(2). (3) The particulate matter emission standards under Section 3 and the nitrogen oxides emission standards under Section 5 apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. The sulfur dioxide emission standards under Section 4 apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or when both emergency conditions exist and the procedures under subsection (4) of this section are implemented. (4) During emergency conditions in the principal company, an affected facility with a malfunctioning FGD system may be operated if sulfur dioxide emissions are minimized by: (a) Operating all operable FGD system modules, and bringing back into operation any malfunctioned module as soon as repairs are completed; (b) Bypassing flue gases around only those FGD system modules 518 ------- PRINTED AUGUST. 30, 1989 °LOSIP.4TH” that have been taken out of operation because they were incapable of any sulfur dioxide emission reductions or which would have suffered significant physical damage if they had remained in operation; and (C) Designing, constructing, and operating a spare FGD system module for an affected facility larger than 365 MW (1,250 MM BTU/hr) heat input (approximately 125 MW electrical output capacity). The department may require the owner or operator within sixty (60) days of notification to demonstrate spare module capacity. To demonstrate this capability, the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with the appropriate requirements of Sections4 (1),(2) and (4), for any period of operation lasting from twenty-four (24) hours to thirty (30)_ days when: 1. Any one (1) FGD module is not operated; 2. The affected facility is operating at the maximum heat input rate; 3. The fuel fired during the twenty—four (24) hour to thirty (30) day period is representative of the type and average sulfur content of fuel used over the typical thirty (30) day period; and 4. The owner or operator has given the department at least thirty (30) days notice of the date and period of time over which the demonstration will be performed. (5) After the initial performance test required by 401 KAR 50:045, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and percentage reduction requirements under Section 4 and the nitrogen oxides emission limitations under Section 5 is based on the average emission rate for thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. A separate performance test is completed at the end of each boiler operating day after the initial performance test, and a new thirty (30) day average emission rate for both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides and a new percent reduction for sulfur dioxide are calculated to show compliance with the standards. (6) For the initial performance test required by 401 KAR 50:045 compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and percent reduction requirements under Section 4 and the nitrogen oxides emission limitation under Section 5 is based on the average emission rates for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and percent reduction for sulfur dioxide for the first thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. The initial performance test is the only test in which at least thirty (30) days prior notice is required unless otherwise specified by the department. The initial performance test is to be scheduled so that the first boiler operating day of the thirty (30) successive boiler operating days is completed within sixty (60) days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial startup of the facility. (7) Compliance is determined by calculating the arithmetic average of all hourly emission rates for SO 2 and NO for the 519 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LCSIP.4TH” thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, except for data obtained during startup, shutdown,malfunction (NOX only), or emergency conditions (SO 2 only). Compliance with the percentage reduction requirement for SO 2 is determined based on the average inlet and average outlet SO 2 emission rates for the thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. (8) If an owner or operator has not obtained the minimum quantity of emission data as required under Section 7, compliance of the affected facility with the emission requirements under Sections 4 and 5 for the day on which the thirty (30) day period ends may be determined by the department by following the applicable procedures in sections 6.0 and 7.0 of Reference Method 19, filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015. SECTION 7. Emission monitoring. (1) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring the opacity of emissions discharged to the atmosphere, except where gaseous fuel is the only fuel combusted. If opacity interference due to water droplets exists in the stack (for example, from the use of a FGD system), the opacity is monitored upstream of the interference (at the inlet to the FGD system). If opacity interference is experienced at all locations (both at the inlet and outlet of the sulfur dioxide control system), alternate parameters indicative of the particulate matter control system’s performance shall be monitored, subject to the approval of the department. (2) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions, except where natural gas is the only fuel combusted as follows: (a) Sulfur dioxide emissions are monitored at both the inlet and outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device. (b) For a facility which qualifies under the provisions of Section 4(4), sulfur dioxide emissions are or ly monitored as discharged to the atmosphere. (C) An “as fired” fuel monitoring system (upstream of coal pulverizers) meeting the requirements of Reference Method 19 may be used to determine potential sulfur dioxide emissions in place of a continuous sulfur dioxide emission monitor at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device as required under paragraph (a) of this subsection. (3) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring nitrogen oxide emissions discharged into the atmosphere. (4) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system for measuring the oxygen or 520 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” carbon dioxide content of the flue gases at each location where sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides emissions are monitored. (5) The continuous monitoring systems under subsections (2) to (4) of this section shall be operated and data shall be recorded during all periods of operation of the affected facility including periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction or emergency conditions, except for continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments. (6) When emission data are not obtained because of continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks and zero span adjustments, emission data will be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by the department or the reference methods as described in subsection (8) of this section to provide emission data for a minimum of eighteen (18) hours in at least twenty-two (22) out of thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. (7) The one (1) hour averages required by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4 are expressed in lbs/MM BTU heat input and are used to calculate the average emission rates under Section 6. The one (1) hour averages are calculated using the data points required by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4. At least two (2) data points must be used to calculate the one (1) hour averages. (8) Reference methods filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015 used to supplement continuous monitoring system data to meet the minimum data requirements in subsection (6) of this section will be used as specified below or otherwise approved by the department. (a) Reference Methods 3, 6, and 7 shall be used as applicable. The sampling location is the same as that used for the continuous monitoring system. (b) For Method 6 the minimum sampling time is twenty (20) minutes and the minimum sampling volume is 0.02 dscm (0.71 dscf) for each sample. Samples are taken at approximately sixty (60) minute intervals. Each sample represents a one (1) hour average. (C) For Method 7, samples are taken at approximately thirty (30) minute intervals. The arithmetic average of these two (2) consecutive samples represent a one (1) hour average. (d) For Method 3, the oxygen or carbon dioxide sample is to be taken for each hour when continuous SO 2 and NO data are taken or when Methods 6 and 7 are required. Each sample shall be taken for a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in each hour using the integrated bag method specified in Method 3. Each sample represents a one (1) hour average. (e) For each one (1) hour average, the emissions expressed in lb/MM BTU heat input are determined and used as needed to achieve the minimum data requirements of subsections (6) of this section. (9) The following procedures are used to conduct monitoring system performance evaluations and calibrations checks required by 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4. (a) Reference Method 6 or 7, as applicable, is used for 521 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” conducting performance evaluations of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides continuous monitoring systems. (b) Sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides, as applicable, is used for preparing calibration gas mixtures under Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B to 40 CFR 60. (c) For affected facilities burning only fossil fuel, the span value for a continuous monitoring system for measuring opacity is between sixty (60) and eighty (80) percent and for a continuous monitoring system measuring nitrogen oxides is determined using the formula given in Appendix C of this regulation. (d) All span values computed under subsection (2) (C) of this section for burning combinations of fossil fuels are rounded to the nearest 500 ppm. Ce) For affected facilities burning fossil fuel, alone or in combination with non-fossil fuel, the span value of the sulfur dioxide continuous monitoring system at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device is 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential emissions of the fuel fired, and the outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device is fifty (50) percent of maximum estimated hourly potential emissions of the fuel fired. SECTION 8. Compliance Determination Procedures and Methods. (1) The following procedures and reference methods are used to determine compliance with the standards for particulate matter under Section 3. (a) Method 3 is used for gas analysis when applying Method 5 or Method 17. (b) Method 5 is used for determining particulate matter emissions and associated moisture content. Method 17 may be used for stack gas temperatures less than 160 0 C (320 °F). Method 9 shall be used for visible emissions. (c) For Methods 5 or 17, Method 1 is used to select the sampling site and the number of traverse sampling points. The sampling time for each run is at least 120 minutes and the minimum sampling volume is 1.7 dscin (sixty (60) dscf) except that smaller sampling times or volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the department. (d) For Method 5, the probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train is set to provide a gas temperature no greater than 160 °C (320 °F). (e) For determination of particulate emissions, the oxygen or carbon dioxide sample is obtained simultaneously with each run of Methods 5 or 17 by traversing the duct at the same sampling location. Method 1 is used for selection of the number of traverse points except that no more than twelve (12) sample points are required. (f) For each run using Methods 5 or 17, the emission rate expressed in ng/J heat input is determined using the oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements and particulate matter measurements obtained under this section, the dry basis F c factor and the dry basis emission rate calculation procedure contained in Method 19. (g) Prior to the department’s issuance of a particulate matter reference method that does not experience sulfuric acid mist interference problems, particulate matter emissions may be 522 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” sampled prior to a wet FGD system. (2) The following procedures and methods are used to determine compliance with the sulfur dioxide standards under Section 4. (a) Determine the percent of potential combustion concentration (percent PCC) emitted to the atmosphere as follows: 1. Fuel pretreatment (% R f): Determine the percent reduction achieved by any fuel pretreatment using the procedures in Method 19. Calculate the average percent reduction for fuel pretreatment on a quarterly basis using fuel analysis data. The determination of %R f to calculate the percent of potential combustion concentration emitted to the atmosphere is optional For purposes of determining compliance with any percent reduction requirements under Section 4, any reduction in potential So 2 emissions resulting from the following processes may be credited: fuel pretreatment (physical coal cleaning, hydrodesulfurization of fuel oil, etc.), coal pulverization, and bottom and flyash interactions. 2. Sulfur dioxide control system (% R). Determine the percent sulfur dioxide reduction achieved by any sulfur dioxide control system using emission rates measured before and after the control system following the procedures in Method 19; or, a combination of an “as fired” fuel monitor and emission rates measured after the control system following the procedures in Method 19. When an “as fired” fuel monitor is used, the percent reduction is calculated using the average emission rate from the sulfur dioxide control device and the average So 2 input rate from the “as fired” fuel analysis for thirty (30) successive boiler operating days. 3. Overall percent reduction (% R f): Determine the overall percentage reduction using the results obtained in subparagraph 1. and 2. of this paragraph following the procedures in Method 19. Results are calculated for each thirty (30) day period using the quarterly average percent sulfur reduction determined for fuel pretreatment from the previous quarter and the sulfur dioxide reduction achieved by a sulfur dioxide control system for each thirty (30) day period in the current quarter. 4. Percent emitted (% PCC): Calculate the percent of potential combustion concentration emitted to the atmosphere using the following equation: Percent PCC = 100 - Percent R 0. (b) Determine the sulfur dioxide emission rates following the procedures in Method 19. (3) The procedures and methods outlined in Method 19 are used in conjunction with the thirty (30) day nitrogen oxides emission data collected under Section 7 to determine the compliance with the applicable nitrogen oxides standard under Section 5. (4) Electric utility combined cycle gas turbines shall be performance tested for particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides using the procedures of Method 19. The sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emission rates from the gas turbine used in Method 19 calculations are determined when the gas turbine is performance is tested under 401 KAR 59:018. The potential uncontrolled particulate matter emission rate from a 523 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 ‘ t LOSIP.4TH” gas turbine is defined as 0.04 lb/MM BTU heat input. SECTION 9. Reporting Requirements. (1) For sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter emissions, the performance test data from the initial performance test and from the performance evaluation of the continuous monitors, including the transniissometer, are submitted to the department. (2) For sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides the following information shall be reported to the department for each twenty- four (24) •hour period. (a) Calendar date. (b) The average sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission rates, (lb/MM BTU) for each thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, ending with the last thirty (30) day period in the quarter; reasons for non-compliance with the emission standards; and description of corrective actions taken. (C) Percent reduction of the potential combustion concentration of sulfur dioxide for each thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, ending with the last thirty (30) day period in the quarter; reasons for non-compliance with the standard; and description of corrective actions taken. (d) Identification of the boiler operating days for which pollutant or diluent data have not been obtained by an approved method for at least eighteen (18) hours of operation of the facility; justification for not obtaining sufficient data; and description of corrective action taken. (e) Identification of the times when emissions data have been excluded from the calculation of average emission rates because of startup, shutdown, malfunction (NO x only), emergency conditions (SO 2 only), or other reasons, and justification for excluding data for reasons other than startup, shutdown, malfunction, or emergency conditions. (f) Identification of “F” factor used for calculations, method of determination, and type of fuel coinbusted. (g) Identification of times when hourly averages have been obtained based on manual sampling methods. (h) Identification of the times when the pollutant concentration exceeded full span of the continuous monitoring system. (i) Description of any modifications to the continuous monitoring system which could affect the ability of the continuous monitoring system to comply with Performance Specifications 2 or 3. (3) If the minimum quantity of emission data as required by Section 7 is not obtained for any thirty (30) successive boiler operating days, the following information obtained under the requirements of Section 6(8) is reported to the department for that thirty (30) day period: (a) The number of hourly averages available for outlet emission rates and inlet emission rates as applicable. (b) The standard deviation of hourly averages for outlet 524 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” emission rates and inlet emission rates as applicable. (C) The lower confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the upper confidence limit for the mean inlet emission rate as applicable. (d) The applicable potential combustion concentration. (e) The ratio of the upper confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the allowable emission rate as applicable. (4) If any standards under Section 4 are exceeded during emergency conditions because of control system malfunction, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement: (a) Indicating that emergency conditions existed and requirements under Section 6(4) were met during each period, and (b) Listing the following information: 1. Time periods the emergency condition existed; 2. Electrical output and demand on the owner or operator’s electric utility system and the affected facility; 3. Amount of power purchased from interconnected neighboring utility companies during the emergency period; 4. Percent reduction in emissions achieved; 5. Atmospheric emission rate (lb/MM BTU) of the pollutant discharged; and 6. Actions taken to correct control system malfunction. (5) If fuel pretreatment credit toward the sulfur dioxide emission standard under Section 4 is claimed, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement: (a) Indicating what percentage cleaning credit was taken for the calendar quarter, and whether the credit was determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 8 and Method 19; and (b) Listing the quantity, heat content, and date each pretreated fuel shipment was received during the previous quarter, the name and location of the fuel pretreatment facility, and the total quantity and total heat content of all fuels received at the affected facility during the previous quarter. (6) For any periods of which opacity, sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides emissions data are not available, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement indicating if any changes were made in operation of the emission control system during the period of data unavailability. Operations of the control system and affected facility during periods of data unavailability are to be compared with operation of the control system and affected facility before and following the period of data unavailability. (7) The owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement indicating whether: (a) The required continuous monitoring system calibration, span, and drift checks or other periodic audits have or have not been performed as specified. (b) The data used to show compliance were or were not obtained in accordance with approved methods and procedures of this part 525 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH t ’ and are representative of plant performance. (c) The minimum data requirements have or have not been met; or, the minimum data requirements have not been met for errors that were unavoidable. (d) Compliance with the standards has or has not been achieved during the reporting period. (8) For the purposes of the reports required under 401 KAR 59:005, Section 4, periods of excess emissions are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds the applicable opacity standards under Section 3(2). Opacity levels in excess of the applicable opacity standard and the date of such excesses are to be submitted to the department each calendar quarter. (9) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall submit the written reports required under this section and 401 KAR 59:005 to the department for every calendar quarter. All quarterly reports shall be postmarked by the thirtieth (30th) day following the end of each calendar quarter. Effective date: January 7, 1981 [ NOTE: AUTHORITY DELEGATED MARCH 26, 1981 SEE 46FR47487 ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1981] THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 526 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX A Determination of Allowable Sulfur Dioxide If emissions of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere are greater than 0.60 lb/MN BTU heat input: E S0 2 = (0.80x + 1.2 y)/100 and P SO 2 = 10 percent If emissions of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere are less than or equal to 0.60 lb/MM BTU heat input: E SO 2 = (.80 x ÷ 1.2y)/100 and P SO 2 = (90 x + 70y)/100 Where: E SO 2 is the prorated sulfur dioxide emission limit lb/MN BTU heat input; P SO 2 is the percentage of potential sulfur dioxide emission allowed (percent reduction required = 100 — P SO 2 ; x is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of liquid or gaseous fuels (excluding solid-derived fuels); y is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of solid fuel (including solid- derived fuels) 527 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 I J SIp.4THIt APPENDIX B Determination of Allowable Nitrogen Oxides Emissions E NO 2 = (.20 w + .30 x ÷ .50y + .60z)/l00 Where: E NO 2 is the applicable standard for nitrogen oxides when multiple fuels are combusted simultaneously (lb/MN BTU heat input); w is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to .20 lb/MM BTU heat input standard; x is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .30 lb/MN BTU heat input standard; y is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .50 lb/MN BTU heat input standard; arid z is the percentage of total heat input derived from the combustion of fuels subject to the .60 lb/MM BTU heat input standard. 528 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” APPENDIX C Determination of Span Value for Nitrogen Oxides (in parts per million) Span Value for Fossil Fuel Nitrogen Oxides Gas 500 Liquid 500 Solid 1,000 Combination 500 (x+y) +1, 0002 Where: x = the fraction of total heat input derived from gaseous fossil fuel; y = the fraction of total heat input derived from liquid fossil fuel; and z = the fraction of total heat input derived from solid fossil fuel. 529 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 7.64 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW ANNONIUM SULFATE MANUFACTURING UNITS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this regulation shall apply to each affected facility commenced on or after February 4, 1980. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS (1) “Affected facility” means each ainmonium sulfate dryer within an aminonium sulfate manufacturing plant in the caprolactam by- product, synthetic, and coke oven by-product sectors of the ammoniuln sulfate industry commenced on or after the classification date defined below. (2) “Aimnonium sulfate dryer” means a unit or vessel into which ammonium sulfate is charged for the purpose of reducing the moisture content of the product using a heated gas stream. The unit includes foundations, superstructure, material charger systems, exhaust systems, and integral control systems and instrumentation. (3) tiAmmonjum sulfate feed material streams” means the sulfuric acid feed stream to the reactor/crystallizer for synthetic and coke oven by-product ammonium sulfate manufacturing plants; and means the total or combined feed streams (the oximation anunoniuin sulfate steam and the rearrangement reaction aminonium sulfate steam) to the crystallizer stage, prior to any recycle steams. (4) “Amnionium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ammonium sulfate. (5) “Caprolactam by-product ammonium sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ainmoniuni sulfate as a by-product from process streams generated during caprolactam manufacture. (6) “Classification date” means February 4, 1980. (7) “Coke oven by-product ammoniuni sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces ammoniuin sulfate by reacting sulfuric acid with ammonia recovered as a by-product from the manufacture of coke. (8) “Synthetic amnioniuin sulfate manufacturing plant” means any plant which produces animoniuin sulfate by direct combination of ammonia and sulfuric acid. SECTION 3. Standard for Particulate Matter. On or after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by 401 MAR 59:005 is completed, no owner or operator of an ainmonium sulfate dryer subject to the provisions of this regulation shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere, from any ammonium sulfate dryer, particulate matter at an emission rate exceeding 0.15 kg of particulate per megagram (Mg) of amnioniuin sulfate 530 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” produced (0.30 lb of particulate per ton of ammonium sulfate produced) and exhaust gases with greater than fifteen (15) percent opacity. SECTION 4. Monitoring of Operations. (1) The owner or operator of any ammonium sulfate manufacturing plant subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate flow monitoring devices which can be used to determine the mass flow of aminonium sulfate feed material steams to the process. The flow monitoring device shall have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its range. However, if the plant uses weigh scales of the same accuracy to directly measure production rate of aminonium sulfate, the use of flow monitoring devices is not required. (2) The owner or operator of any anunonium sulfate manufacturing plant subject to the provisions of this regulation shall install calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device which continuously measures and permanently records the total pressure drop across the emission control system The monitoring device shall have an accuracy of plus or minus five (5) percent over its operating range. SECTION 5. Test Methods and Procedures. C].) Reference methods in Appendix A to 40 CFR 60 filed by reference in 401 KAR 50:015, except as provided in 401 KAR 50:045, shall be used to determine compliance with Section 3 as follows: (a) Method 5 for the concentration of particulate matter; (b) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses; (C) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; (d) Method 3 for gas analysis; and (e) Method 9 for visible emissions. (2) For Method 5, the sampling time for each run shall be at least sixty (60) mm and volume shall be at least 1.5 dscm (fifty—three (53) dscf). (3) For each run, the particulate emission rate E, shall be computed as follows: E sd x C /1000 (metric units) E = 0 sd x C English units) where: E = The particulate emission rate (kg/hr or lb/hr): sd = The average volumetric flow rate (dscm/hr or dscf/hr) as determined by Method 2: and C = The average concentration (g/dscm or lb/dscf) of particulate matter as determined by Method 5. (4) For each run, the rate of ammonium sulfate production, P (Mg/hr or tons/hr), shall be determined by direct measurement 531 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” using product weigh scales or computed from a material balance. If production rate is determined by material balance, the following equations shall be used. (a) For synthetic and coke oven by-product amnionium sulfate plants, the aminonium sulfate production rate shall be determined using the following equation: P=Ax BxCx Z where: P = Ammonium sulfate production (Mg/hr or tons/hr) A = Sulfuric acid flow rate to the reactor/crystallizer (1/mm or gal/mm) averaged over the time period taken to conduct the run: B = Acid density (g/cc of lb/ft 3 ) (a function of acid strength and temperature); C = Percent acid strength in decimal form: and Z = Physical constant (Metric units: use 0.0808: English units: use 0.3016). (b) For caprolactamn by-product ammonium sulfate plants the anunonium sulfate production rate shall be determined using the following equation: P=DxExFxZ where: P = Production rate of caprolactani by-product ammoniuni sulfate (Mg/hr or tons/hr); D = Total combined feed stream flow rate to the ammoniunm sulfate crystallizer before the point where any recycle streams enter the stream (1/mm or gal/mm) averaged over the time period taken to conduct the test run: E = Density of the process stream solution (g/l or lb/gal); F = Percent mass of ammonium sulfate in the process solution in decimal form; and Z = Physical constant for conversion of time and mass units: 6.0 x 1O 5 for metric units, 0.03 for English units. (5) For each run, the dryer emission rate shall be computed as follows: R = E/P where: R = The dryer emission rate (kg/Mg or lb/ton); E = The particulate emission rate (kg/hr or lb/hr) from subsection (3) of this section; and P = The rate of amnmoniuni sulfate production (Mg/hr or tons/hr) from subsection(4) of this section. Adopted 4—20—82; effective 4—20-82. 532 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” THIS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF JUNE 9, 1982. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Original Reg: OCT 20, 1981 JUNE 9, 1982 47 FR 25011 533 ------- I ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” REGULATION 8 VEHICLE EXHAUST TESTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of Regulation 8 shall apply to the owners of all vehicles, as defined in section 2 (11): (1) registered in Jefferson County or (2) licensed with Federal or State official tags and operated in Jefferson County on a regular basis or (3) registered in another Kentucky county but owned by a declared Jefferson County resident provided said vehicle is not exempt pursuant to Section 3 (e). SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in regulation 1.02. (1) “Administrator” means the manager of the Vehicle Exhaust Testing program of Jefferson County. (2) “Board” means the Air Pollution Control Board of Jefferson County as provided for in KRS Chapter 77 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL. (3) “Certificate” means one of the following permits issued in the form of a vehicle test report for each motor vehicle to indicate the status of said vehicle with respect to meeting the applicable gas or opacity emission standards: (a) “Compliance Certificate” indicates that the emissions from said vehicle complied with applicable exhaust emissions standards at the time of testing. (b) “Exemption Certificate” indicates that the emissions from said vehicle are exempt from complying with applicable standards during the calendar year of testing. (4) “Contractor” means any person, business firm, partnership or corporation with whom the Board may execute am agreement providing for the construction, purchase, lease, renovation, equipment, maintenance, personnel, management, or operation of the official exhaust testing program. (5) “Certification month” means the month in which the vehicle is assigned to obtain a certificate. (6) “District” means the Air Pollution Control District of Jefferson County as provided for in KRS Chapter 77 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL. (7) “Exhaust gas emissions standards” means the maximum allowable levels of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons appropriate for the age and type of vehicle testing. 534 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (8) “Exhaust opacity emission standard” means the maximum allowable level of emissions which visibly reduces the transmission of light and obscures objects in the background. (9) “Fleet” means a group of vehicles owned by one person or a group of vehicles leased by one person who has the responsibility of registering said vehicles. (10) “Mobile equipment” means road rollers, road graders, farm tractors, unlicensed vehicles on which power shovels are mounted, and such other construction equipment customarily used only on the site of construction and which is not practical for the transportation of persons or property upon the highways. (11) “Motor vehicle” or “vehicle” means any licensed automobile, truck, bus, motorcycle, housecar, or self-propelled, motor-driven vehicle used on the public road regardless of its type of classification of license or certificate except: (a) Mobile equipment (b) Fire engines in regular service with a municipal, volunteer, or industrial fire fighting department (c) Vehicles licensed as “historic” pursuant to KRS 186.043 (d) Trucks licensed pursuant to KRS 186.050 (3) with a declared gross weight in excess of 18,000 pounds, that are not officially licensed or not federal, state and local government owned (e) Vehicles powered only by electricity. (f) Vehicles licensed pursuant to KRS 186.050(4) or KRS 186.050(7) having a gross vehicle weight exceeding 18,000 pounds. (12) “Operator” means any individual in control of a vehicle. (13) “Owner” means any individual, public or private corporation, political subdivision, government agency, municipality, industry, association, or other entity whatsoever holding legal title to or a lease interest in a motor vehicle. (14) “Person” or “persons” means any individual, public or private corporation, political subdivision, government agency, municipality, industry co-partnership, association, firm, trust, estate, or other entity whatsoever. (15) “Test,” or “testing,” means the use of approved analyzers or opacity meters to gauge pollutant levels in vehicle exhaust and the comparison of those measured levels to allowable levels set by regulation. (16) “Testing center” or “center” means a center established by the Contractor for the purpose of conducting vehicle exhaust testing. 535 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (17) “Vehicle Testing Contract” means the contract between the District and the Contractor dated June 7, 1983, and any amendments thereto. (18) “Year” means calendar year. SECTION 3. PERIODIC EXHAUST TESTING OF VEHICLES REQUIRED (a) Beginning January 1, 1984, all vehicles which are included within the scope of Section 1 shall be tested each year and a certificate shall be obtained for each such vehicle. (b) The District shall assign a certification month each year to all vehicles. Once a certification month is assigned to a vehicle, the test applicable to that certification month shall satisfy this regulation only for the year of the original certification month even though obtained in the subsequent year. The District shall notify all owners of the certification month assigned to their vehicles and when their vehicles may be tested. Such notice shall advise the owners that legal actin may occur for failure of the owners to obtain a certificate by the end of the certification month. (C) Owners of vehicles with official license plates must schedule heir vehicles for annual testing by supplying to the District a roster of vehicles and a proposed schedule for test. If said owners do not file the required schedule with the District prior to the beginning of the testing program, the District will set an equally apportioned schedule. (d) A vehicle operated outside Jefferson County may be exempted from testing by the District in a given year if the owner certifies to the satisfaction of the District that the vehicle will not be driven in Jefferson County for more than thirty days during the given year. SECTION 4. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR VEHICLES (a) EMISSION STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES (1) Vehicles, except those included in paragraph (ii), shall be tested for exhaust gas emission levels of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons. To pass such test, a vehicle’s emissions must not exceed the standards set in Table A. (ii) Diesel vehicles, two cycle motorcycles and vehicles which the Administrator determines shall not be tested for exhaust gas emissions because of fuel or engine characteristics, shall be tested for opacity of visible emissions. To pass such test, a vehicle’s visible emissions from any exhaust point must not exceed the standards set in Table B. (b) REJECTION FOR CAUSE 536 ------- PRINTED AUGUST- 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (i) If the operator fails to present the vehicle’s Certificate of Registration prior to testing and test station personnel are not readily able to verify the vehicle presented for test is the proper vehicle, the test shall not be performed and the vehicle shall be rejected from the testing center. (ii) If the vehicle or operator causes an unsafe condition at the center, the test shall not be performed or, if performed, shall be invalid and the vehicle rejected from the center. Such conditions include but are not limited to leaking fuel, operator incapacity or operator misconduct. (iii) If the exhaust system of a vehicle subject to exhaust gas standards leaks to such an extent that the sum of the exhaust outlet carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide concentrations recorded for the idle speed reading is 7% or less, the test shall be invalid and the vehicle rejected from the testing center. Some vehicle models, especially motorcycles, have proven unable to meet this criteria. In those few cases the test station personnel shall verify that the exhaust system is sound and that a valid test can be obtained prior to testing. Vehicles subject to opacity testing which have leaking, defective or detached exhaust systems shall also be rejected from the center without receiving a test. (iv) Repeated stalling will cause rejection of the vehicle from the test lane until the vehicle is repaired. SECTION 5. TESTING PROCEDURE (a) OPERATOR PROCEDURE - ALL TESTS (i) The operator shall cause the vehicle to be operated for purposes of testing under such conditions as specified hereinafter and as directed by testing personnel. (ii) Unless ‘otherwise directed or during an emergency, the operator shall remain in the vehicle while the vehicle is in the test lane. (iii) During testing, the engine shall be at normal operating temperature and not overheating (as indicated by gauge warning light or boiling radiator) with all accessories turned off. (iv) Vehicles shall be approximately level during testing. (v) If the engine stalls during testing, the test shall be restarted. (b) EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS TEST PROCEDURE (i) The test shall measure vehicle exhaust gas emissions for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrocarbons. (ii) Analyzers shall be warmed-up, in stabilized operating condition and adjusted according to manufacturer’s specifications. 537 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (iii) If the vehicle is capable of being operated with liquid or gaseous fuels, the test may be performed with either fuel at the operator’s option. (iv) With the engine operating at idle speed and transmission in neutral, the sampling probe of the gas analytical system shall be inserted into the tail pipe. (v) The exhaust sample probe must be inserted at least ten inches into the tail pipe. If this is not possible, an extension boot shall be used. (vi) Multiple exhaust vehicles shall be tested by sampling all tail pipes simultaneously. (vii) The engine shall be accelerated, with no external loading applied, from idle to approximately one half throttle for at least ten seconds. The engine speed shall then be returned to idle. (viii) After stabilized readings are obtained or at the end of thirty seconds, whichever comes first, the exhaust gas emission levels shall be measured by the gas analytical system and the results recorded on the vehicle test report. (ix) If a 1981 or newer Ford motor vehicle fails the first test, the engine shall be turned off, restarted and the vehicle tested again. (C) EXHAUST OPACITY TEST PROCEDURE (1) The test shall measure vehicle exhaust emissions for opacity. (ii) Opacity meters shall be warmed up, in stabilized operating conditions and adjusted according to manufacturer’s specifications. (iii) The engine shall be accelerated, with n o external loading applied, from idle to approximately one half chrottle for at least ten seconds. The engine speed shall then be returned to an idle speed condition. (iv) After stabilized readings are obtained or at the end of thirty seconds, whichever comes first, the opacity of the vehicle’s visible emissions shall be tested at idle speed and the results recorded on the vehicle test report. SECTION 6. TESTING OF FLEET VEHICLES (a) A fleet owner may contract with the District to test his vehicles. To qualify for fleet testing, a fleet owner shall: (i) Use exhaust analysis equipment meeting specifications in the Vehicle Testing Contract 538 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH t ’ (ii) Assure that the test equipment provides a record keeping mechanism of record results of all tests (iii) Maintain an in-house program for the maintenance of vehicles (iv) Establish a program for the training and re—training of mechanics involved in the testing and repair of vehicles (v) Make available to the District at reasonable times the results of the test performed by the fleet owner (vi) Provide a procedure for integrating the results of the tests performed by the fleet owner into the record keeping system of the contractor (vii) Allow the District or the contract to perform quality assurance activities as defined in Section 9 (viii) Enter into a contract with the District which details the equipment and procedures to be used by the fleet owner and provides for penalties for noncompliance with its terms. (b) A fleet owner may contract with the District and the contractor for testing by the contractor outside public testing hours or at other than the public testing centers. (C) The fee for testing of a fleet vehicle shall be not less than the fee established by Section 7 and may be subject to a surcharge not to exceed the contractor’s additional cost of fleet tests. (d) The fleet owner may repair failed vehicles in accordance with this regulation. SECTION 7. TEST FEES AND SURCHARGES It is the Board’s intention that the test fee be fair and equitable. Any additional fleet testing costs shall be borne by the fleet owner. (a) The test fee is $6.00. (b) A fee shall be collected before the first test is performed. If the vehicle fails the first test, one retest shall be provided free of charge, provided that the appropriate Vehicle Repair Form is satisfactorily completed and returned. Any test performed in addition to the first test and retest will require payment of a test fee. (c) Test fees shall be collected by the contractor and the District’s part paid to District weekly by check. (d) The District shall have the right to audit the contractor’s records and procedures to substantiate that the contractor is properly collecting and accounting for test fees and surcharges. 539 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 ULOSIP.4THtI SECTION 8. TEST FORMS AND CERTIFICATES (a) FORMS APPROVED The contractor shall use only test forms and certificates approved by the District. Other materials or information may be given to the operator only if approved by the District. (b) VEHICLE TEST REPORT The operator of each vehicle tested shall be given a vehicle test report which contains the following information: (i) Center identification. (ii) Date and time of test(s). (iii) Identification number of the inspector. (iv) Vehicle license number. (v) Vehicle model year. (vi) If applicable, notice of rejection from the center and reason for rejection. (vii) Emission test results (hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, or opacity). (viii) Applicable emission standards. (ix) Whether the vehicle has passed or failed the applicable emission standards. (x) Whether the test results are from the first test or retests. (xi) All other information required on the form. (c) COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE A compliance certificate shall be issued only when the vehicle has passed its test. (d) VEHICLE REPAIR FORMS (i) A Vehicle Repair Form shall be given to the operator of each vehicle failing the first test. The form shall be completed and returned to the test personnel at the time of retest. The owner must show on the Vehicle Repair Form with the appropriate documentation the following items: 1. Proof that repairs were performed. Repairs made earlier than one month prior to the certification month shall not be included. 540 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” 2. Proof that repair costs have been incurred by the owner. 3. Proof that the repairs are related to the type of failure shown on the vehicle test report. (ii) The person performing emissions-related repairs to a vehicle shall itemize on the Vehicle Repair Form the repairs performed and shall certify that the repairs were performed by signing his name on the Vehicle Repair Form and adding his company name and address if applicable. (e) EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE An owner shall be eligible for an exemption certificate when his vehicle fails a retest and the repair costs shown on the Vehicle Repair Form equal or exceed the following amounts provided a measurable improvement in the exhaust analysis has been recorded. In certain situations where a measurable improvement is impossible, an appeal to the District for a verifiable exemption shall be available. ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT MOTORCYCLES MODEL YEAR TYPE OF FAILURE AMOUNT 1980 or older carbon monoxide $15.00 1980 or older hydrocarbon $35.00 1980 or older both carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon $50.00 1981—1983 carbon monoxide $30.00 1981—1983 hydrocarbon $50.00 1981—1983 both carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon $65.00 VEHICLES COVERED BY 207(B) WARRANTY 1984 or newer carbon monoxide $100.00 1984 or newer hydrocarbon $100.00 1984 or newer both carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon $200.00 VEHICLES NOT COVERED BY 207(B) WARRANTY 1984 or newer CO $50.00 1984 or newer HC $65.00 1984 or newer both $100.00 All Opacity $3 .00 MOTORCYCLES MODEL TYPE OF FAILURE AMOUNT All 4 cycle Carbon monoxide $15.00 All 4 cycle hydrocarbon $35.00 All 4 cycle both carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon $50.00 All 2 cycle opacity $35.00 541 ------- PRINTED AUGUST 30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” (f) REJECTED VEHICLES Owners of vehicles which are rejected from the testing center shall not be issued a certificate. SECTION 9. QUALITY ASSURANCE The District will monitor the operation of each testing center with unannounced, unscheduled, and unidentified inspections to check all aspects of test operations, including, but not limited to, the calibration and maintenance of the analyzers and opacity meters; test procedures; facility appearance; service given by testing center personnel; and any records. Under certain conditions, the District may require that the use of an exhaust analyzer or opacity meter be suspended if there is a malfunction or incorrect calibration of the testing equipment. SECTION 10. TESTING PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS (a) TRAINING All testing personnel must successfully complete a training course approved by the District. The course will include training in providing courteous, fair, and efficient service to the public. (b) IDENTIFICATION Whenever testing personnel are on duty and in contact with the public, they shall wear identification tags visible to the public. (C) CONFLICT OF INTEREST Neither the contractor nor any employee of the contractor shall be engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, maintaining, or repairing vehicles. The contractor may maintain or repair his own vehicles. (ii) Neither the Air Pollution Control Board members nor any employees of the Air Pollution Control District shall have any financial interest in the vehicle testing contract, nor any interest in providing testing centers or equipment for the Vehicle Exhaust Testing program. SECTION 11. ENFORCEMENT (a) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT An owner who fails to obtain a certificate by the end of the certification month may have a sworn criminal complaint taken out against him in District Court. (b) COURT PROCEEDINGS 542 ------- PRINTED AUGUST-30, 1989 “LOSIP.4TH” defendant in the above complaint will be subject to prosecution in District Court. (C) PENALTIES Every person who violates this regulation shall be guilty of a violation and shall be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for a first offense and not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each subsequent offense. Taxation of court costs shall be mandatory upon conviction and shall not be probated or suspended. dopted 1—5—83; effective 1—5—83; amended 9—21—83, 10—26—83, 3—21—84, 1—1—85, 12—18—85, 12—17—86. FillS IS THE FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION AS OF DEC 3, 1987. Date Submitted Date Approved Federal to EPA by EPA Register Driginal Reg: JUNE 15, 1983 OCT 9, 1984 49 FR 39547 1st Revision: FEB 18, 1986 FEB 2, 1987 52 FR 3115 2nd Revision: MAR 20, 1987 DEC 3, 1987 52 FR 45959 543 ------- a -kcn ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” SECTION B THIS SECTION CONTAINS REGULATIONS THAT HAVE QI BEEN FEDERALLY APPROVED REGULATION 2.05 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for prevention of significant deterioration of air quality contained in 40 CFR 51.24 made effective by 45 Federal Register 52729 is hereby adopted and filed by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 51.24, provides for the prevention of significant deterioration of ambient air quality. The provisions of this regulation are applicable to any major stationary source or any major modification which emits any pollutant regulated by the Clean Air Act and which commence construction after April 16, 1986 in areas designated as attainment and unclassifiable for any pollutant as defined pursuant to Section 107 (d) (1) (D) or (E) of the Clean Air Act. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITIONS In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “State”, shall be read as “District”; “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”; and “Plan, Plans, all plans, or State Implementation Plan” shall be read as “Appendix N to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan”. SECTION 4. SPECIAL PROVISIONS For the purpose of this regulation the following shall apply: (a) The reasonable period specified in 40 CFR 51.24 (b) (3) (ii) shall be five years. (b) All areas of the District shall be classified as Class II. (C) Increases in pollutant concentration over the baseline concentration shall be limited to the values set forth in 40 CFR 51.24 (C). However concentration of the pollutant shall not exceed standards set forth in 40 CFR 51.24 (d). SECTION 5. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4-19—72; amended 6-13—79, 4—21—82, 11—16—83, 4—16—86. 1 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 2.12 EMISSIONS TRADING (INCLUDING BANKING AND BUBBLE RULES) SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY This regulation establishes procedures for the creation, holding, transfer and use of surplus emission reductions. The procedures are intended to encourage the development of innovative pollution control technology and to lower the cost of meeting emission control requirements. This regulation applies to any pollutant for which the Board has adopted stationary source control regulations. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Emission reduction credit” (ERC) means a surplus emission reduction registered by the District in accordance with the requirements of this regulation which represents a decrease in the quantity of a pollutant discharged from the affected facility below the level used in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) attainment demonstration or otherwise required by federal or District regulations. (b) “Banking” means the District’s system for recording ERCs so that they may be used or transferred for use at a future date. This system shall be called the Jefferson County Emission Bank. (C) “Bubble” means an alternative emission control strategy where several affected facilities are regarded as being placed under a hypothetical dome which simulates a single emission point. Affected facilities under a bubble may reallocate emission decreases and increases so long as the requirements of this regulation are met. (d) “Netting” means to lower the net emissions increase at an expanding or modernizing source below the significant levels using an ERC obtained at the same source and thus become exempt from the requirements of Regulations 2.04 and/or 2.05 as described in Regulation 2.05. (e) “Offset” means use of an ERC obtained from an existing source to counterbalance the increase in emissions in a nonattainment area from a new or modified source subject to the requirements of Regulation 2.04. (f) “SIP baseline emissions” means that level of emissions (actual or allowable) for each emission point included in the SIP attainment demonstration for the attainment year. (g) “Stationary source” means all of the affected facilities which belong to the same industrial grouping, are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under the 2 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” control of the same person (or persons under common control) except the activities of any vessel. Affected facilities shall be considered as part of the same industrial grouping if they belong to the same “Major Group” (i.e., which have the same two- digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, as amended. (h) “Reasonable further progress” means annual incremental reductions in emissions of the applicable air pollutant which are sufficient to provide for attainment of the applicable ambient air quality standard by the attainment date specified in the latest SIP attainment demonstration. (1) “Federally enforceable” means all limitations and conditions which are enforceable by the EPA Administrator including those requirements developed pursuant to 40 CFR Parts 60 and 61, requirements within the Kentucky State Implementation Plan, and any permit requirements established pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR 51.18 and 51.24. SECTION 3. APPLICATION PROCEDURES (a) Any person who owns or operates a source at which a reduction in emissions has occurred or will occur may apply for creation of an ERC in accordance with the requirements of this regulation. (b) A person shall apply for creation of an ERC on appropriate forms supplied by the District. (c) Applications requesting creation of an ERC based on emission reductions that have already occurred will be approved by the District provided they occurred on or after August 7, 1977, are consistent with the reasonable further progress requirements of the SIP attainment demonstration, and comply with the requirements of this regulation. (d) Applications requesting an ERC for emission reductions that have not occurred at the time of application will be reviewed by the District and conditionally approved or denied. An ERC will be registered however, only if after the reduction has taken place. The District may conditionally deposit an ERC into the Emissions Bank when it receives from the source assurances of a commitment to produce a specific reduction in the future. In all cases the reduction must actually be achieved before it can be used in an emission trade except as specified in Regulation 2.04. (e) Before an ERC may be created, the source owner must obtain a revised operating permit which includes specific quantifiable emission limits or operating procedures reflecting quantifiable emissions or, when applicable, the operating permits for discontinued equipment shall be voided by the District. A revised operating permit will include, as needed, requirements for record keeping or reporting; requirements for performance testing; limitations on fuel burned or raw materials used; restrictions on operating hours, production rates, or input rates; limitations on operating procedures or control equipment 3 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” to be used and any other requirements needed to insure that the reduction will be properly obtained and maintained. The various limits must state the minimum time period over which they will be averaged (e.g., lbs/hour, or lbs/MM OTU averaged over 24 hours, production rate/day). (f) ERCs which have already been approved by the District since March 14, 1979 shall remain certified and be used in accordance with this regulation. SECTION 4. CREATION OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (a) No ERC may be created unless the following criteria are met: (i) The emission level after the reduction must be enforceable and a banking permit must be issued by the Air Pollution Control Officer. (ii) The emission reduction must represent a real and permanent decrease in emissions below the applicable baseline level used in the SIP attainment demonstration. If emissions from the affected facility are not separately identified in the SIP demonstration of attainment of national ambient air quality standards, the baseline will be average emissions calculated from the operating history of the affected facility for a representative two year period of time before the application is filed. Credit will not be given for actual emissions which exceed allowable emissions. Where allowable emissions were used in the SIP attainment demonstration, credit will be based on allowable emissions at the rated capacity of the affected facility using the normal operating hours unless different parameters were used in the attainment demonstration. If historical data are deemed inadequate by the District, action on an application may be deferred for up to one year while operating data are compiled by the applicant. (iii) An applicant proposing an emission decrease from process curtailments or source shutdowns must demonstrate that the proposed decrease will not be negated by countervailing emission increases occurring at other sources in the same area in response to the applicant’s process curtailment or shutdown. (iv) The emission reduction is federally enforceable. (b) Confirmation of Emission Reduction Credits (i) To confirm emission reductions, the District may require source tests, continuous monitors or any other acceptable means of measurement. (ii) In cases where the District determines that the emission reduction estimates made by the applicant are uncertain, the District reserves the right to grant ERCs for a smaller quantity of emission reductions than requested. (c) After all of the requirements of this regulation have been 4 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” met and the emission reduction has actually occurred, the District will register an ERC in the records kept for that purpose and issue a banking permit to the source creating the emission reduction credit. (d) After receiving written certification from a source that it has released its rights of control on valid existing ERCs created by that source or after a source fails to apply for potential credits within six months of receiving written notice of this opportunity from the District, the District staff shall establish ERCs for general use by the community in the Jefferson County Emissions Bank. These credits shall be designated as unallocated credits for purposes of accounting and designation in reports. (e) During the time that an ERC is held in the emissions banking system, its quantity (expressed in tons per year) will be subject to the following: (1) If the District determines that additional emission reductions are required from sources because ambient standards are not attained, because of increment violation, or because new RACT requirements are being imposed, sources could satisfy the requirement for additional reductions by using their banked ERCs, by reducing emissions elsewhere or by purchasing equivalent ERCs. (ii) If new information becomes available to the District which results in more emission estimates, the District will adjust the value of the affected ERCs accordingly. (iii) If an owner or operator of a source who created an ERC fails to comply with the requirements resulting from creating the ERC, the District shall adjust the quantity of ERCs registered in the banking system for that owner or operator. (iv) If the ERC has been used, any violation of the conditions under which the ERC was created will result in enforcement action against the source producing the emission reduction. SECTION 5. USE OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (a) An ERC may be used at the time it is registered or it may be held for future transfer or use. (b) An ERC may be transferred in whole or in part by any means of conveyance permitted by the laws of this state. The role of the District in trading of an ERC will be limited to providing information on the documentation and registration of ERCs and to providing technical assistance with regard to possible future use of the ERCs being sold or transferred. No transfer shall be effective until the District 1) is notified thereof in writing, 2) issues a revised banking permit to the ERC owner, and 3) notes the transfer of ownership in the District registry for that purpose. 5 ------- PRINTED August -30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (c) Use of unallocated credits (i) Upon application to the Air Pollution Control Officer for use of unallocated community ERC5, a notice of public hearing shall be issued to the public and interested parties. The staff shall maintain a list of interested parties to which notice is to be provided. (ii) After appropriate notice and public hearing, the Board shall approve or deny the application for use of any unallocated ERCs, and, if approved, shall direct the Air Pollution Control Officer to issue a banking permit to the applicant. (iii) The Board, after appropriate public notice and public hearing, may also award unallocated ERCs through any other procedure (such as public auction) which would be in the interests of the Louisville and Jefferson County community. (d) Registered ERCs may be used in accordance with this regulation to establish alternative emission limits (bubbles), to offset increased emissions from new or modified sources, to offset Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) increment consumption (if emission reduction occurs after applicable PSD baseline date), or to net out of new source review required by Regulations 2.04 and 2.05 (provided the emission reductions occur at the same source netting the increases). SECTION 6. WITHDRAWAL OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (a) Application for use of ERCs shall be made on forms provided by the District, and be accompanied by a letter from the owner requesting the appropriate action. (b) Before an ERC may be used or transferred, the ERC owner must obtain a revised banking permit from the District which shows the new balance of ERCs in the owner’s account, and the amount which was used or transferred. (C) Use of an ERC will be allowed only in transactions where emissions being exchanged are in the same criteria pollutant category. Hazardous and non—hazardous emissions may only be traded against each other if the hazardous emission is decreased. (d) An ERC may not be used to meet the requirements of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) established under 40 CFR 60, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) established under 40 CFR 61, the requirement for Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) if Regulation 2.04 applies, or the requirement for Best Available Control Technology (BACT) if Regulation 2.05 applies. 6 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” SECTION 7. AIR QUALITY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR USE OF PARTICULATE MATTER, SULFUR DIOXIDE, AND CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (a) Air quality modeling as specified in Regulation 2.1]. will be required for use of ERCs representing stack emissions of particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, or carbon monoxide, if one or more of the following conditions occur: (i) Use of an ERC produces a net increase in applicable baseline emissions; or (ii) The relevant emission points are not in the same immediate vicinity (with 100 meters); or (iii) The effective plume height of the source increasing emissions is less than that of the source decreasing emissions. (b) Only limiting modeling will be necessary for use of ERCs for trades if there is no net increase in applicable baseline emissions and if emissions after the trade will not cause a significantly different air quality impact from the original emission points. The limited modeling need only include the emission points involved in creating and using the ERC. A “significantly different impact” is one that equals or exceeds the levels specified in the following table: SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS Pollutant 24—Hour 8—Hour S02 13 ug/ m3 TSP 10 ug/ni3 CO 575 ug/1n3 (C) For use of ERCs representing emissions which exceed the conditions of subsection (b) of this section, diffusion modeling considering all sources in the area of impact will be required as follows: (1) Modeling must show that use of the ERC will neither create a new ambient violation nor interfere with reasonable further progress toward attaining national ambient air quality standards as planned in the SIP, and (ii) Modeling must show that use of the ERC will not create an increment violation in a PSD area as defined in Regulation 2.05. (d) No air quality modeling shall be required for use of ERCs representing stack emissions of volatile organic compounds or nitrogen oxides. SECTION 8. ALTERNATE EMISSION STANDARDS (BUBBLES) (a) The owner of a source, or the owners of two or more different sources, may propose a bubble which establishes alternative 7 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” standards for the affected facilities included in the bubble. (b) A source or sources may meet the requirements of Regulation 6 or 7 (except as provided in Section 6 (d) of this regulation) by using a bubble provided that all of the following conditions are met: (i) The bubble shall address only pollutant control scenarios for the same pollutant on affected facilities having permits, (ii) The bubble does not allow increases in hazardous pollutant emissions in trade for reductions in less hazardous pollutants, (iii) The bubble demonstrates that it would provide an overall net improvement in air quality as a result of its approval, (iv) The bubble demonstrates no net increase in applicable baseline emissions subject to the plan, (v) The bubble must demonstrate a consideration of applying controls on all emission points to the extent engineering technology is available, and include an implementation schedule, and (vi) Bubbles which involve multiple permittees must include an executed agreement among all participants to comply with the provisions of the plan. (C) The total emission limit determined under subsection (b) of this section may be reallocated among affected facilities included in the bubble. Emission reductions shall meet the requirements contained in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 4 of this regulation. Air quality modeling shall be performed in accordance with the requirements contained in Section 7 of this regulation. If ERCs are withdrawn from or deposited into the Jefferson County Emissions Bank in conjunction with the bubble, the ERC5 shall be created or used in accordance with the requirements contained in this regulation. (d) Upon application and demonstration that the conditions of subsections (b) and (c) have been addressed, the District shall issue a public notice in accordance with Regulation 2.07 announcing a public hearing before the Board at the first available regularly scheduled meeting. After considering all information, the Board may decide to approve, or disapprove, the alternative emission reduction plan. Where the alternative emission reduction plan exceeds a compliance schedule of any applicable emission regulation, extensions up to December 31, 1987 may be granted for volatile organic compounds or carbon monoxide provided that the reasonable further progress requirements of the approved SIP are maintained. Upon further approval, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall issue and/or revise such permits as necessary to provide for effective enforceability of the entire alternative reduction plan. Each approved alternative reduction plan shall be reviewed and 8 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 LOSIP.BIt implemented as a distinct and separate permit action. (e) Upon receiving notice from the District that a new or more restrictive emission standard has become applicable to any affected facility included in a bubble under this section, the owner or owners of those affected facilities shall submit revised permit applications. The revised applications must demonstrate either reductions in total bubble emission or use of ERC5 which are equal to or are greater than the reduction required by the new emission standards. (f) Alternative emission limits approved under this section become applicable requirements of the SIP for purposes of Sections 113 and 304 of the Clean Air Act and are enforceable in the same manner as other SIP requirements. (g) No alternative emission standard will be established for an affected facility which is presently subject to federal enforcement action unless EPA approves the alternative standard and the schedule for meeting it. As used in this subsection, “federal enforcement action” means any of the following actions under the applicable sections of the Clean Air Act: civil actions filed under Section 113 (b), criminal actions filed under Section 113 (C), a notice imposing noncompliance penalties issued under Section 120, administrative orders issued under Section 113 (a), or a citizen suit filed under Section 304 where EPA has intervened. SECTION 9. TRANSMITTALS TO EPA The District will transmit copies of the following documents to EPA promptly after the documents are prepared: (a) Copies of public notices and supporting documents relating to proposed District action on applications for use of an ERC or bubble. (b) Copies of permits reflecting District approval of use of an ERC or bubble, including data on emission limits before and after the approval. SECTION 10. AMENDMENT OF THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS The District will approve the proposed use of an ERC or bubble without action to formally amend the State Implementation Plan if the proposed use fails under any one of the following four conditions: (a) The sum of emissions increases at the affected facilities totals less than 100 tons per year after applicable control requirements and there is no net increase in applicable baseline emissions as a result of the trade; (b) The trade involves volatile organic compounds (VOC) or oxides 9 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” of nitrogen (NO x),and there is no net increase in applicable baseline emissions; (C) The trade involves particulate matter, sulfur dioxide or carbon dioxide and does not require air quality modeling due to the provisions of Section 7 (a) of this regulation; or (d) The trade involves particulate matter, sulfur dioxide or carbon monoxide and requires only limited air quality modeling due to the provisions of Section 7 (b) of this regulation and this modeling is conducted in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 2.11. Adopted 4/21/82; effective 4/21/82; amended 11/16/83, 4—16—86. 10 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (d) Photochemical Oxidants (measured as 03 and corrected for interferences due to nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide): (1) 235 micrograms per cubic meter (0.12 ppm) — The standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly average concentrations above 0.12 ppm (235 ug/m3) is equal to or less than 1, and determined by Appendix H of 40 CFR 50. 11 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4 EMERGENCY EPISODES REGULATION 4.01 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR EMERGENCY EPISODES Conditions justifying the proclamation of an air pollution alert, air pollution warning, or air pollution emergency shall be deemed to exist whenever the District determines that the accumulation of air contaminants in any place is attaining or has attained levels which could, if such levels are sustained or exceeded, present a threat to the health of the public. In making this determination, the District shall be guided by the criteria specified in Regulation 4.02 Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4—19—72; amended 9—1—76, 6—13—79. 12 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4.02 EPISODE CRITERIA SECTION 1. AIR POLLUTION FORECAST (a) Air Pollution Meteorological Forecast: An internal watch by the District shall be actuated by a National Weather Service Advisory that an Atmospheric Stagnation Advisory is in effect or that atmospheric conditions are conducive to the accumulation of air contaminants. SECTION 2. AIR POLLUTION ALERTS. (a) An alert level is that concentration of air pollutants at which initial stage control actions are to begin. An alert will be declared when any one of the pollutant alert levels is reached at any monitoring site and meteorological conditions are such that the pollutant concentrations can be expected to remain at these levels for 12 or more hours or to increase, or in the case of oxidants the situation is likely to recur within the next 24 hours, unless control actions are taken. (b) Pollutant alert levels. (i) Sulfur dioxide: 800 micrograms per cubic meter (0.3 ppm), 24- hour average. (ii) Particulates: 375 micrograms per cubic meter, 24—hour average. (iii) Sulfur dioxide and particulates combined: product of sulfur dioxide in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) and particulates in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) equal to 65,000. (iv) Carbon monoxide: 17 milligrams per cubic meter (15 ppm), 8- hour average. (v) Oxidants (ozone): 392 micrograms per cubic meter (0.20 ppm), 1-hour average. (vi) Nitrogen Dioxide: a. 1130 micrograms per cubic meter (0.6 ppm) 1-hour average. b. 282 micrograms per cubic meter (0.15 ppm) 24-hour average. SECTION 3. AIR POLLUTION WARNINGS (a) A warning level indicates that air quality is continuing to degrade and that additional control actions are necessary. A warning will be declared when any one of the following levels is reached at any monitoring site and meteorological conditions are such that pollutant concentrations can be expected to remain at 13 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 tILOSIp.B these levels for more 12 or more hours or to increase, or in the case of oxidants the situation is likely to recur within the next 24 hours, unless control actions are taken. (b) Pollutant warning levels. (1) Sulfur dioxide: 1600 micrograms per cubic meter (0.6 ppm), 24-hour average. (ii) Particulates: 625 micrograms per cubic meter, 24-hour average. (iii) Sulfur dioxide and particulate combined: product of sulfur dioxide in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) and particulates in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) equal to 261,000. (iv) Carbon monoxide: 34 milligrams per cubic meter (30 ppm) 8- hour average. (v) Oxidants (ozone): 800 micrograms per cubic meter (0.4 ppm), 1-hour average. (vi) Nitrogen dioxide: 2,260 micrograms per cubic meter (1.2 ppm), 1-hour average; 565 micrograms per cubic meter (0.3 ppm), 24-hour average. SECTION 4. AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCIES. (a) An emergency level indicates that air quality in continuing to degrade to a level that should never be reached and that the most stringent control actions are necessary. An emergency will be declared when any one of the following levels is reached at any monitoring site and meteorological conditions are such that pollutant concentrations can be expected to continue for 12 or more hours to increase, or in the case of oxidants, the situation is likely to recur within the next 24 hours, unless control actions are taken. (b) Pollutant emergency levels. (i) Sulfur dioxide: 2,100 micrograms per cubic meter (0.8 ppm), 24-hour average. (ii) Particulates: 875 micrograms per cubic meter, 24-hr average. (iii) Sulfur dioxide and particulate combined: Product of sulfur dioxide in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) and particulates in micrograms per cubic meter (24-hour average) equal to 393,000. (iv) Carbon monoxide: 46 milligrams per cubic meter (40 ppm) 8- hour average. (v) Oxidants (ozone): 1,000 micrograms per cubic meter (0.5 ppm), 14 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” 1-hour average. (vi) Nitrogen dioxide: 3,000 micrograms per cubic meter (1.6 ppm), 1-hour average, 750 micrograms per cubic meter (0.4 ppm), 24-hour average. SECTION 5. EPISODE TERNINATION Any status declared by the application of these criteria will remain in effect until the criteria for that level are no longer met. At such time the next lower appropriate status will be assumed. SECTION 6. DECLARATION OF EPISODES (a) An episode status based on the deterioration of air quality alone may be declared. An air stagnation advisory or special dispersion statement need not be in effect. (b) An appropriate episode status shall be declared when any monitoring site records ambient air quality levels as designated in the episode criteria herein, and conditions are expected to remain per 4.(a) above. The criteria shall be applied to individual monitoring sites and not to area wide air quality. Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4—19—72; amended 9—1—76, 6—13—79, 11—28—79, 2—16—83. 15 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B t ’ REGULATION 4.03 GENERAL ABATEMENT REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1. BASIC PROVISIONS (a) The intent of this regulation is to provide for the curtailment or reduction of processes or operations which emit an air contaminant or an air contaminant precursor whose criteria has been reached and are located in the affected area for which an episode level has been declared. (b) Any person responsible for the operation of an air contaminant source shall take all actions required by this regulation irrespective of any economic hardship which may be incurred due to such actions. (C) When the District determines that specified criteria are being approached and may be reached at one or more monitoring sites solely because of emissions from a limited number of sources or processes, it may act to prevent the attainment of the episode level by notifying such source that the abatement strategies as described in this regulation or the standby plans are required insofar as they apply to such source, and shall be put into effect until a satisfactory reduction in the ambient pollution concentration has been achieved. (d) Air Pollution Alert. When the District declares an air pollution alert, any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminants shall take all air pollution alert actions required under section 2 and 3 of this regulation for such sources of air contaminants and shall put into effect the preplanned strategy for an air pollution alert. (e) Air Pollution Warning. When the District declares an air pollution warning, any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminants shall take all air pollution alert actions required for such sources of air contaminations and shall put into effect the preplanned strategy for an air pollution warning. (f) Air Pollution Emergency. When the District declares an air pollution emergency, any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminants shall take all air pollution emergency actions required for such sources of air contaminants and shall put into effect the preplanned strategy for an air pollution emergency. SECTION 2. STANDBY PLANS (a) Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air pollutants as set forth in subregulations 4.04, 4.05 and 4.06 shall prepare standby plans for reducing the emission of air pollutants during episode periods (air pollution alert, warning, and emergency). Standby plans shall be designed to reduce or eliminate emission of air pollutants in accordance with the objectives set forth in this regulation. 16 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (b) Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air pollutants not set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall, when requested by the District in writing, prepare standby plans for reducing the emission of air pollutants during episode periods. Standby plans shall be designed to reduce or eliminate emissions of air pollutants in accordance with the objectives set forth in this regulation. (C) Standby plans as required under subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall be in writing and identify the source of air pollutants, the approximate amount of reduction of pollutants, and a brief description of the manner in which the reduction will be achieved during episode periods. (d) During episode periods, standby plans required by this section shall be made available on the premises to any person authorized to enforce the provisions of the standby plan. (e) Standby plans required by this section shall be submitted to the District upon request within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such request; such plans shall be subject to review and approval by the District. If, in the opinion of the District, a plan does not effectively carry out the objectives as set forth in sections 2 (a) and 2 (b), the District may disapprove it, state its reasons for disapproval and order the preparation of an amended plan within the time period specified in the order. SECTION 3. ALERT STAGE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (a) When an alert is declared on reaching the criteria level for particulates or sulfur dioxide, the following actions shall be taken: (i) There shall be no open burning by any person of tree waste, vegetation, refuse or debris. (ii) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste shall be limited to the hours of 12 noon and 4 P.M., local time. (iii) Persons operating fuel-burning equipment which requires boiler lancing or soot blowing shall perform such operations only between the hours of 12 noon and 4 P.M., local time. (b) When an alert is declared based on reaching the criteria level for oxidants, carbon monoxide or nitrogen dioxide the following actions shall be taken: (i) Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and oxidants alerts: a. Persons operating motor vehicles shall eliminate all unnecessary operations. b. Road repairs should be postponed to alleviate traffic 17 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” congestion. c. When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industries of the following classifications: primary metal industry, petroleum refining operations, chemical industries, surface coating operations, paper and allied products, and grain industry: 1. Reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production operations; 2. Reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit solid particles, gas vapors, or malodorous substances; 3. Reduction of heat load demands for processing. (ii) Oxidant alerts: a. In addition to actions required in subsection (b) (i) above, persons operating petroleum loading and dry cleaning facilities shall reduce hydrocarbon emissions by twenty-five (25) percent. SECTION 4. WARNING STAGE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (a) When a warning is declared on reaching the criteria level for particulates or sulfur dioxide the following actions shall be taken: (1) There shall be no open burning by any person of tree waste, vegetation, refuse or debris in any form. (ii) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste or liquid waste shall be prohibited. (iii) Persons operating fuel-burning equipment which requires boiler lancing or soot blowing shall perform such operations only between the hours of 12 noon and 4 P.M., local time. (b) When a warning is declared based on reaching the criteria level for oxidants, carbon monoxide or nitrogen dioxide the following actions shall be taken: (i) Persons operating motor vehicles must reduce operation by the use of car pools and increased use of public transportation and the elimination of unnecessary operation. (ii) Persons operating petroleum loading and dry cleaning facilities shall reduce hydrocarbon emissions by fifty (50) percent). (iv) Road repairs should be postponed to alleviate traffic congestion. SECTION 5. EMERGENCY STAGE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 18 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (a) When an emergency is declared based on reaching the criteria for any air contaminant the following shall apply: (1) There shall be no open burning by any person of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form. (ii) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid or liquid waste shall be prohibited. (iii) All places of employment described below shall immediately cease operations: a. Mining and quarrying of nonmetallic minerals. b. All construction work except that which must proceed to avoid emergent physical harm. C. All manufacturing establishments except those required to have in force an air pollution emergency plan. d. Wholesale trade establishments: i.e. places of business primarily engaged in selling merchandise to retailers, to industrial, commercial, institutional or professional users, or to other wholesalers, or acting as agents in buying merchandise for or selling merchandise to such persons or companies. e. All offices of local, county, and state government including authorities, joint meetings, and other public bodies excepting such agencies which are determined by the chief administrative officer of local, county, or state government, authorities, joint meetings, and other public bodies to be vital for public safety and welfare and the enforcement of the provisions of this order. f. All retail trade establishments except pharmacies and stores primarily engaged in the sale of food. g. Banks, credit agencies other than banks; securities and commodities brokers, dealers, and exchanges and services; offices of insurance carriers, agents and brokers; real estate offices. h. Wholesale and retail laundries, laundry services, photographic studios, beauty shops, barbershops, shoe repair shops. i. Advertising offices; consumer credit reporting, adjustment and collection agencies; duplication, addressing, blueprinting, photocopying, mailing list and stenographic services; equipment rental services; commercial testing laboratories. j. Automobile repair, automobile services, garages. k. Establishments rendering amusement and recreation services including motion picture theaters. 1. Elementary and secondary schools, colleges, universities, professional schools, and public and private libraries. 19 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (iv) All commercial and manufacturing establishments not included in this order will institute such actions as will result in maximum reduction of air contaminants from their operations by ceasing, curtailing, or postponing operations which emit air contaminants, to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment. (v) The use of motor vehicles is prohibited except in emergencies with the approval of local or state police. (b) Source curtailment. When an emergency is declared based on reaching criteria level for any pollutant, any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminants listed below shall take all required control actions for this emergency level. (i) When the source of air contaminant is fuel-fired electric power generating facilities, maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by utilization fuels having lowest ash and sulfur content; maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing; and diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of the emergency area. (ii) When the source of air contaminant is fuel—fired process steam generating facilities, maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by reducing heat and steam demands to absolute necessities consistent with preventing equipment damage or person injury; maximum utilization of mid—day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing and taking the action called for in the emergency plan. (iii) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industries including but not limited to the following classifications: primary metal industries, petroleum refinery, chemical industries, mineral processing industries, grain industry, paper and allied products, surface coating, degreasing nitric acid production, and fertilizer manufacturing, the source shall initiate action required to accomplish the following objectives: a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing and ceasing as expeditiously as possible, all operations which are not necessary for the prevention of injury to persons or damage to equipment. b. Elimination of the emission of air contaminants by ceasing trade waste disposal processes which emit solid particles, gases, vapors or malodorous substances; maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 .P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing or soot blowing; and maximum reduction of heat load demands consistent with subparagraph a. above. Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4—19—72; amended 9—1—76, 6—13—79, 2—16—83. 20 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4.04. PARTICULATE AND SULFUR DIOXIDE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1. ALERTS To curtail particulates and/or sulfur dioxide sources when an alert is declared, based on reaching the criteria level for particulates and/or sulfur dioxide, control actions as described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (C) below shall be implemented. (a) When the source of air contaminant is fuel-fired electric power generating facilities: substantial reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by utilization of fuels having low ash and sulfur content; maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing; and diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of the alert area. (b) When the source of air contaminant is fuel-fired process steam generating facilities: substantial reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by utilization of fuels having low ash and sulfur content; maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing; and substantial reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations. (c) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industries including but not limited to the following classifications: primary metals industry, petroleum refining operations, chemical industries, mineral processing industries, paper and allied products and grain industry, the following action shall be taken: (i) All operations that emit particulates or sulfur dioxide shall curtail, postpone, or defer production to the extent necessary to effect at least a twenty-five (25) percent reduction of the instantaneous particulate and/or sulfur dioxide emission levels existing at the time the alert is declared unless such reduction of the operation is demonstrated to the District’s satisfaction to be impractical because of some physical limitation of the operation. (ii) In addition, maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit solid particles, gas vapors, or malodorous substances; maximum reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with subparagraph (i) above; and maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing or soot blowing. SECTION 2. WARNINGS Curtailment of particulate and/or sulfur dioxide sources. When a warning is declared based on reaching the criteria level for particulates and/or sulfur dioxide, control actions as described 21 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) below shall be implemented. (a) When the source of air contaminant is fuel-fired electric power generating facilities: maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by utilization of fuels having lowest ash and sulfur content; maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing; and diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of the warning area. (b) When the source of air contaminant is fuel fired process steam generating facilities associated with manufacturing industries subject to paragraph (d) below: maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash and sulfur content; fmaximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing; making ready for use a plan of action to be taken if an emergency develops; and maximum reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations. (C) When the source of air contaminant is fuel fired process steam generating facilities not subject to paragraph (b) above: maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by reducing heat and steam demands to absolute necessities consistent with preventing injury to persons or damage to equipment; and maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing. (d) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industries which may require considerable lead time for shut-down including but not limited to the following classifications: petroleum refining, chemical industries, primary metal industries, glass industries, paper and allied products, the source shall initiate action required to accomplish the following objectives. (1) Cease, curtail, postpone or defer production and all operations as is necessary to prepare for an immediate shut—down if an emergency is declared. (ii) Effect a maximum reduction of emissions of air contaminants from manufacturing operations during the time period the warning is in effect by ceasing, curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and all operations. (iii) Effect a maximum reduction of emissions by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit solid particles, gases, vapors, or malodorous substances; maximum reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with subparagraphs (i) and (ii) above; and maximum utilization of mid-day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing. (e) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industries which may require relatively short lead times for shut-down including but not limited to the following 22 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” classifications: primary metals industries, chemical industries; mineral processing industries and grain industry, the source shall initiate action required to accomplish the following objectives: (i) Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, as expeditiously as possible, all operations which are not necessary for the prevention of injury to persons or damage to equipment; and by curtailing, as expeditiously as possible, all operations which are necessary for the prevention of injury to persons or damage to equipment to the maximum extent possible such that the curtailment does not cause injury to persons or damage to equipment. (ii) Elimination of the emission of air contaminants by ceasing trade waste disposal processes which emit solid particles, gases, vapors, and malodorous substances; maximum reduction of heat load demands consistent with subparagraph (1) above; and maximum utilization of mid—day (12 noon to 4 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing or soot blowing. SECTION 3. EMERGENCIES Procedures outlined in Section 5 of Regulation 4.03 (General Abatement Requirements) shall be implemented. Adopted 4—19-72; effective 4—19—72. 23 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4.05. HYDROCARBON AND NITROGEN OXIDES REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1. ALERTS Curtailment of sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides. When an alert is declared on reaching the criteria level for oxidants or nitrogen dioxide, control actions described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (C) below shall be implemented. (a) When the source of air contaminant is fuel fired electric power generating facilities, substantial reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of the alert area. (b) When the source of air contaminant is fuel fired process steam generating facilities, substantial reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by substantial reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operation. (c) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industry including but not limited to the following classifications: surface coating, degreasing, nitric acid production, fertilizer manufacturing and any other hydrocarbon or nitrogen oxide emitting source(s), the following action shall be taken (i) Nitrogen dioxide alerts: a. Reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and operations; b. In addition, maximum reduction of emissions shall be accomplished by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit solid particles, gas vapors or malodorous substances; and maximum reduction of heat load demand for processing consistent with subparagraph a. above. (ii) Oxidant alerts: a. All operations that emit hydrocarbons shall curtain, postpone, or defer production to the extent necessary to effect at least a twenty-five (25) percent reduction of the instantaneous hydrocarbon emission levels existing at the time the alert is declared unless such reduction of the operation is demonstrated to be impractical because of some physical limitation of the operation. SECTION 2. WARNINGS Curtailment of sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides. When a warning is declared based on reaching the criteria level of oxidants or nitrogen dioxide, control actions described in paragraphs (a) or (b) below shall be implemented. 24 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (a) When the source of air contaminant is fuel fired electric power generating facilities or is fuel fired process steam generating facilities, the provisions of section 1 (a) of Regulation 4.05 above shall apply. (b) When the source of air contaminant is manufacturing industry including but not limited to the following classifications: surface coating, degreasing, nitric acid production, fertilizer manufacturing and any other hydrocarbon or nitrogen oxide emitting sources; the source shall initiate action required to accomplish the requirements specified in Regulation 4.04, section 2 (d) (ii) and (e) (1) and (ii). SECTION 3. EMERGENCIES Procedures outlined in Section 5 of Regulation 4.03 (General Abatement Requirements) shall be implemented. Adopted 4—19—62; effective 4—19—72; amended 6—13—79, 2—16—83. 25 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4.06. CARBON MONOXIDE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1. ALERTS Curtailments of sources of carbon monoxide. When an alert is declared based on reaching the criteria level for carbon monoxide, the control actions described in paragraph (a) below shall be implemented. (a) When the source of carbon monoxide is manufacturing industry including but not limited to the following classifications: primary metal industry, petroleum refining operations, and other carbon monoxide emitting sources, the following actions shall be taken: (i) All operations that emit carbon monoxide shall curtail, postpone, or defer production to the extent necessary to effect at least a twenty-five (25) percent reduction of the instantaneous carbon monoxide emission levels existing at the time the alert is declared unless such reduction of the operation is demonstrated to the District’s satisfaction to be impractical because of some physical limitations of the operation. SECTION 2. WARNINGS Curtailment of sources of carbon monoxide. When a warning is declared based on reaching the criteria level for carbon monoxide, the control actions described in paragraph (a) below shall be implemented. (a) When the source of carbon monoxide is manufacturing industry including but not limited to the following classifications: primary metal industry, petroleum refining operations, and other carbon monoxide emitting sources, the source shall initiate action required to accomplished the requirements specified in Regulation 4.04, section 2 (d) (ii) and (e) (i) and (ii). SECTION 3. EMERGENCIES Procedures outlined in section 5 of Regulation 4.03 (General Abatement Requirements) shall be implemented. Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4—19—72; amended 6—13—79, 2—16—83. 26 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 4.07 EPISODE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Upon the termination of an episode, the plant manager or his designee will notify the District in writing of steps taken to reduce pollution during episode conditions. Adopted 4—19—72; effective 4—19—72. REGULATION 6 STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING AFFECTED FACILITIES REGULATION 6.01 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 4 PERFORMANCE TESTS (a) The owner or operator of affected facilities under this regulation shall conduct performance test(s) according to Regulation 1.04 and shall furnish the District a written report of the results of such performance test when the affected facility is operating under a compliance plan and schedule. Such testing may be either during or after completion of said compliance plan and schedule as required by the District. (b) The following affected facilities are exempt from the requirements of subsection (a) above: (i) Process operations with a process weight rate of less than 100 tons per hour; (ii) Indirect heat exchangers of less than 250 million BTU per hour heat input; (iii) Incinerators with charging rates of 45 metric tons per day or less; (iv) Affected facilities specified in regulations 6.13, 6.15, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 6.19, 6.20, 6.23, 6.24, 6.26, 6.29, 6.30, 6.31, 6.32, 6.33, 6.34, 6.35. (c) The District may require the owner or operator of any affected facility, including those specified in subsection (b) above, to conduct performance tests according to Regulation 1.04 and furnish a written report of the results of such performance tests. (ii) A continuous monitoring system for the measurement of sulfur dioxide in the gases discharged into the atmosphere from the combustion of fuel gases subject to Regulation 6.10 which meets the appropriate performance specifications specified in section 7 of this regulation (except where a continuous monitoring system for the measurement of hydrogen sulfide is installed under subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph). The pollutant gas used to prepare calibration gas mixtures under Performance Specification 2 of 40 CFR 60 paragraph 2.1 and for the calibration checks shall be sulfur dioxide. The span shall be set at 100 ppm. For 27 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” conducting monitoring system performance evaluations, Reference Method 6 shall be used. / (iii) An instrument for continuously monitoring and recording concentrations or hydrogen sulfide in fuel gases burned in any fuel gas combustion device subject to Regulation 6.10 which meets the appropriate performance specifications specified in section 7 of this regulation, if compliance is achieved by removing hydrogen sulfide from the fuel gas before it is burned; fuel gas combustion devices having a common source of fuel gas may be monitored at one location, if monitoring at this location accurately represents the concentration of hydrogen sulfide in the fuel gas burned. The span of the continuous monitoring shall be 300 ppm. (iv) An instrument for continuously monitoring and recording concentrations of sulfur dioxide in the gases discharged into the atmosphere from any Claus sulfur recovery plant subject to Regulation 6.10 which meets the appropriate performance specifications in section 7 of this regulation, if compliance is achieved through the use of an oxidation control system or a reduction control system followed by incineration. The span of this continuing monitoring system shall be set at 500 ppm. (v) An instrument(s) for continuously monitoring and recording the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and reduced sulfur compounds in the gases discharged into the atmosphere from any Claus sulfur recovery plant subject to Regulation 6.10 which meets the appropriate performance specifications specified in section 7 of this regulation, if compliance is achieved through the use of a reduction control system and followed by incineration. The span(s) of this continuous monitoring system shall be set at 20 ppm for monitoring and recording the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and 600 ppm for monitoring and recording the concentration of reduced sulfur compounds. (vi) An instrument for continuously monitoring and recording the concentration of sulfur dioxide in gases discharged into the atmosphere from the fluid catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerator subject to Regulation 6.10 which meets the appropriate performance specifications specified in section 7 of this regulation. The span of this continuous monitoring system shall be 1,500 ppm. 28 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” SECTION 3. EXISTING PRIVATELY OWNED OR MAINTAINED UNPAVED ROAD(S) AND UNPAVED PARKING AREA(S). (a) Any person owning any paved road or unpaved parking area shall discontinue and prevent use of the road or parking area, unless the District has approved a fugitive dust control plan which includes prevented measures and the conditions of the approved plan are met continuously. (b) Exceptions: (1) Any road or parking area which, after demonstration to the District, -will not exceed an average daily traffic count of 10 vehicles averaged over any consecutive 3-day period. (ii) Any road or parking area associated solely with a housing project of 4 family dwelling units or less. SECTION 4. HARD SURFACING OR ROADS AND PARKING AREAS A person constructing or contracting to construct any road or parking area which is to be hard surfaced (concrete or bituminous binder and rock, for example) shall submit to the District a compliance plan and schedule within 6 months of start of construction. The person shall use abatement and preventive measures during construction. SECTION 5. TRAFFIC COUNTS The District may require the person owning or maintaining any unpaved road to supply traffic count information on a regular basis to the District as necessary to determine if additional abatement and preventive measures or changes in the implementation time schedule are required. SECTION 6. EXISTING PUBLICLY OWNED OR MAINTAINED UNPAVED ROADS AND UNPAVED PARKING AREAS (a) By May of each year the political subdivision owning or maintaining unpaved roads or unpaved parking areas shall submit to the District a report on the unpaved roads and parking areas within said political subdivisions which exceed 10 vehicles per day averaged over any 3-day period based upon traffic count information as collected by the political subdivision or the District. (b) Said political subdivisions shall submit a plan and progress report to the District by June 1 of each year which includes a specific time schedule for the control of fugitive dust emissions on unpaved roads and unpaved parking areas. SECTION 7. EARTH AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL MOVING AND EXCAVATING ACTIVITIES No land developer or owner of an existing construction or land development project shall throughout the duration of the project, 29 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” disturb or contract to disturb by grading, excavating or depositing on land, unless abatement and preventive measures are being met continuously. SECTION 8. DEMOLITION, WRECKING AND MOVING OF STRUCTURES No person shall conduct demolition, wrecking, or moving of structures prior to notifying the District. SECTION 9. OPEN MINING ACTIVITIES Open mining shall mean the mining of natural mineral deposits, limestone, coal, gravel, or quarry aggregate, by removing the overburden lying above such deposits and mining directly from the deposits thereby exposed. The term includes, but is not limited to, such practices as open cut mining, quarrying, and dredging. SECTION 10. OTHER ACTIVITIES A description shall be submitted to the District at the District’s request of the nature and scope of the activity and of the existing sources of fugitive dust including but not limited to the following: athletic fields borrow pits campgrounds cleaning construction crushing demolition detonation of explosives drying earth moving excavating fairgrounds feed & grain handling, loading & unloading feed lots handling landfills land leveling mining activities mixing processing of sand, gravel and rock quarrying repair and alteration sandblasting site preparation storage transportation unpaved parking areas unpaved roads vehicle movement waste disposal SECTION 11. ABATEMENT AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES 30 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (a) Unpaved roads and unpaved parking areas. (1) Abatement and preventive measures shall be approved by the District and may include but shall not be limited to frequent watering, addition of dust palliatives, detouring, paving, closure, speed control, or other means such as surface treatment with penetration chemicals (ligninsulfonates, oil, water, cutbacks, etc.) or methods of equal or greater effectiveness in reducing the air contamination produced as demonstrated to the District. (b) Demolition, wrecking, explosive detonations, earth and construction material moving, mining, and excavation activities. (i) Abatement and preventive fugitive dust control measures shall be approved by the District and may include, but shall not be limited to: Wetting down, including pre-watering, landscaping and replanting vegetation; covering, shielding or enclosing the area; paving, temporary or permanent; treating, the use of dust palliatives and chemical stabilization; detouring; restriction of the speed of vehicles on sites; prevention of the deposit of dirt and mud on improved streets and roads and other such effective means of dust control as the District may deem necessary; disturbing less topsoil and reclaiming as soon as possible. (ii) Sequential blasting shall be employed whenever or wherever feasible to reduce the amounts of unconfined particulate matter. (iii) Such dust control strategies as re—vegetation, delay of surface opening until demanded, or surface compaction and sealing, shall be applied. (iv) Hauling equipment shall be washed or wetted down, treated, or covered when necessary to minimize the amount of dust emitted in transit and in loading. This section shall apply to the source facility or permanent installation for the production and distribution of construction materials or supplies. 31 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” SECTION 6. TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES Except as provided in regulation 1.04, performance tests used to demonstrate compliance with Sections 3 and 4 shall be conducted according to the following methods described in CFR) 40 CFR 60: (a) Reference Method 11 for hydrogen sulfide. The sample shall be drawn from a point near the centroid of the gas line. The minimum sampling time shall be ten (10) minutes and the minimum sample volume 0.01 dscm (0.35 dscf) for each sample. The arithmetic average of 2 samples shall constitute one run. Samples shall be taken at approximately one hour intervals. (b) Reference Method 6 for sulfur dioxide. Reference Method 1 shall be used for velocity and volumetric flow rate. The sampling site for determining S02 concentration by Reference F Iethod 6 shall be the same as for determining the volumetric flow rate by Reference Method 2. The sampling point in the duct for flow rate by Reference Method 2. The sampling point in the duct for determining S02 concentration by Reference Method 6 shall be at the centroid of the cross section or at a point no closer to the walls than one meter (39 inches) if the cross—sectional area is 5 square meters or more and the centroid is more than one meter from the wall. The sample shall be extracted at a rate proportional to the gas velocity at the sampling point. The minimum sampling time shall be 10 minutes and the minimum sampling volume 0.01 dscni (0.35 dscf) for each sample. The arithmetic average of 2 samples shall constitute one run. Three runs will constitute compliance test. Samples shall be taken at approximately one hours intervals. 32 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 7.03. CONTROL OF OBJECTIONABL ODORS IN THE AMBIENT AIR SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section shall apply to owners or operators of stationary and mobile sources that emit or may emit objectionable odor(s) that commenced after the effective date of this regulation. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Terms used in this regulation not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in Regulation 1.02. (a) “Objectionable odor” means any odor present in the ambient air which, by itself or in combination with other odors, gases or vapors, is offensive, foul, unpleasant, or repulsive. SECTION 3. (a) No person shall emit or cause to be emitted into the ambient air any substance which creates an objectionable odor beyond his property. An odor will be deemed objectionable when a documented investigation by the District, including as a minimum observations on the odor’s nature, intensity, duration, and location, establish that the odor causes injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to persons or to the public. (b) An instrument, device or technique designated by the District may be used in the determination of the intensity of an odor and may be used in the enforcement of this regulation. (c) An owner or operator of any business or any machine, device, equipment or facility which emits into the ambient air any odorous matter or vapors, gases, dusts or any combination thereof which creates objectionable odors shall provide, properly install, and maintain in good working order and in operation such control devices or procedures as approved by the District. (d) Abatement or control requirements may include but are not limited to: (i) use of catalytic incinerators, afterburners, scrubbers, absorbers, or other methods approved by the District. (ii) the removal and disposal of odorous materials; (iii) the use of methods in handling and storage of odorous materials that minimize emissions. (e) The District may order that a building or buildings in which processing, handling, and storage of any odorous materials are 33 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” performed by tightly closed and ventilated in such a way that all air and gases and gas-borne materials leaving the building are treated by incineration or other effective means for removal or destruction of odorous matter or other contaminants before discharge into the open air. (f) An owner or operator incinerating or processing gases, vapors, or gas-entrained effluents pursuant to this regulation shall provide, properly install and maintain in good working order and in operation, devices as approved by the District for indicating temperatures, pressures or other operating conditions. (g) Odor producing materials shall be stored, transported and handled in a manner that accumulation of such materials resulting from spillage or other escape is prevented. SECTION 4. REPORTING ACCIDENTAL AND OTHER INFREQUENT EMISSIONS Accidental and other infrequent discharges which cause or contribute to objectionable odors shall be reported by telephone to the District by the person responsible for the discharge. Such reports shall be made within 2 hours of the discharge. Adopted 7—14—76; effective 9—1—76. 34 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 7.17 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK SURFACE COATING OPERATIONS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal reference for new automobile and light-duty truck surface coating operations contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart MN, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart MM, limits emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from all new automobile and light-duty truck surface coating operations that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after October 5, 1979. The provisions of this regulation apply to the following affected facilities in an automobile or light-duty truck assembly plant: each prime coat operation, each guide coat operation, and each topcoat operation. Operations used to coat plastic body components or all-plastic automobile or light-duty truck bodies on separate coating lines are exempted from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 6-13—79; effective 6-13-79; amended 2-19-86. 35 ------- PRINTED August .30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 7.65 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW GLASS MANUFACTURING PLANTS. SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for new glass manufacturing plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart CC, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 60, Subpart CC, as published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 53 to 80, July 1, 1983, and as amended by 49 Fed. Reg. 41035 (1984) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart CC, limits emissions of particulate matter from all glass manufacturing plants that. commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 15, 1979. The promulgated standards apply to glass melting furnaces within the following four categories of glass manufacturing plants: container glass, pressed and blown glass, wool Fiberglas, and flat glass. All hand glass melting furnaces, glass melting furnaces designed to produce less than 4,550 kilograms of glass per day and all- electric melters are exempt from the provisions of this regulation. SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as “District”, and “this subpart” shall be read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 2—19—86; effective 2-19—86. 36 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” REGULATION 7.66 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW LEAD-ACID BATTERY MANUFACTURING PLANTS SECTION 1. FEDERAL REFERENCES The federal regulation for lead-acid battery manufacturing plants contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart KK, made effective by 47 Fed. Reg. 16573 (1982) is hereby adopted and filed herein by reference. SECTION 2. SUMMARY (a) The federal regulation adopted herein by reference, 40 CFR 60, Subpart KK, limits the emissions of lead from affected facilities at any lead-acid battery manufacturing plant that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after January 14, 1980. (b) The provisions of this regulation apply to the following affected facilities used in the manufacture of lead—acid storage batteries: (i) Grid casting facility (ii) Paste mixing facility (iii) Three process operation facility (iv) Lead oxide manufacturing facility (v) Lead reclamation (vi) Other lead emitting operations SECTION 3. GENERAL DEFINITION In the federal regulation adopted by reference in this regulation, “Administrator”, “EPA”, and “Agency” shall be read as t Djstrjctu , and “this subpart” shall he read as “this regulation”. SECTION 4. AVAILABILITY. Copies of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Federal Register are available for sale from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Adopted 2—19—86; effective 2—19—86. 37 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 ‘ t LOSIP.B” [ THIS TEXT VARIES SLIGHTLY FROM THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL] (a) There shall be no liquid leakage of volatile organic compounds from the system. (b) The entire dryer exhaust shall be vented through a properly functioning carbon absorber or equally effective control device. (c) The maximum organic solvent concentration in the vent from the dryer control device shall not exceed 100 ppm before dilution. (d) Combined filter and distillation wastes shall not contain more than 25 kilograms of solvent per 100 kilograms of wet waste material. (ii) The residue from a solvent still shall not contain more than 60 kg of solvent per 100 kg of wet waste material. (iii) Filtration cartridges shall be drained in the filter housing for at least 24 hours before being discarded. The drained cartridges shall be dried in the dryer tumbler after draining. (iv) Any other filtration or distillation system can be used if equivalency to these requirements is demonstrated. Any system reducing waste losses below 1 kg solvent per 100 kg clothes cleaned will be considered equivalent. SECTION 4. EXEMPTIONS Section 3 (a) (iii) and (iv) are not applicable to plants where an adsorber cannot be accommodated because of inadequate space or plants where no or insufficient steam capacity is available to desorb adsorbers. (1) Hose connections, unions, couplings and valves; (ii) Machine door gasket and seating; (iii) Filter head gasket and seating; (iv) Pumps; (v) Base tanks and storage containers; (vi) Water separators; (vii) Filter sludge recovery operations; (viii) Distillation units; (ix) Divertor valves; (x) Saturated lint from lint basket; and, (xi) Cartridge filters. 38 ------- PRINTED August 30, 1989 “LOSIP.B” (b) Dryer exhaust concentration shall be determined by the proper installation, operation, and maintenance of approved equipment as determined by the District or by performance tests specified by the District. (C) The amount of solvent in filter and distillation wastes shall be determined by ASTM D 322-67 (77), and substituting collector C from ASRM E 123-78. SECTION 5. COMPLIANCE TIMETABLE The owner or operator of an affected facility shall be required to complete the following: (a) Submit a final control plan for achieving compliance with this regulation no later than April 15, 1981. (b) Award the control system contract no later than June 15, 1981. (c) Initiate on—site construction or installation of emission control equipment no later than December 1, 1981. (d) On-site construction or installation of emission control equipment shall be completed no later than December 1, 1982. (e) Final compliance shall be achieved no later than December 31, 1982. SECTION 6. EXEMPTIONS Perchioroethylene dry cleaning facilities which are coin-operated shall be exempt from this regulation. SECTION 7. DEVIATIONS Deviation with the standards and limitations contained in this regulation, when supported by adequate technical information, will be considered by the District on a case-by-case basis to allow for technological or economic circumstances which are unique to a soruce. 39 ------- |