Volume III-B
Special Study Report
A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Power
in the ORBES Region
Richard A. Tybout
The Ohio State University
May 15, 1977
PHASE
OHIO RIVER BASIN ENERGY STUDY
-------
C21578
OHIO RIVER BASIN ENERGY STUDY
Volume III-B
SPECIAL STUDY REPORT
A BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF POWER IN THE ORBES REGION
Richard A. Tybout
The Ohio State University
May 15, 1977
Prepared for
Office of Energy, Minerals,
and Industry
Office of Research and
Development
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
Washington, D. C.
Grant No. R804851-01-0
-------
CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION
nt-s- i
2.
HISTORIC SURVEY
111-8—3
2.1 THE FIRST FORTY YEARS, 1880-1920
111-8-3
2.2 THE REVERSAL, 1920-47
111-8-3
2.3 THE POST-WORLD WAR II PERIOD, 1947-73
111-8-4
2.4 ThE FUTURE
III-B-5
3.
REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH
III-B-9
3.1 INTRODUCTION
111-8-9
3.2 DATA BASE
111-8-9
3.3 NATIONAL GROWTH RATES
111-8-12
3.4 REGIONAL GROWTH RATES
111-8-22
4.
PROJECTIONS
111-8-31
4.1 PRICE-BASED PROJECTIONS
111-8—31
4.2 QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS
111-8-38
4.2.1 1985 PROJECTIONS
III-B-39
4.2.2 2000 PROJECTIONS
111-8-40
11 1-8- Ui
-------
TABLES
table page
I ll—B— i ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 . . . . Appendices B, C, D, E
III-B—2 NATURAL GAS PRICES, FOURTH QUARTER,
1974 111-8—10
III-B-3 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 . . Appendices B, C, 0, E
111-8—4 NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 . . Appendices B, C, D, E
111-8-5 OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR
1974 Appendices B, C, 0, E
111-8-6 U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH OF
ENERGY PRICES, 1975-85 111-8—13
III-B-7 U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH OF
ENERGY PRICES, 1975—2000 111-8—17
111-8-8 U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH OF
ENERGY QUANTITIES CONSUMED 1975-85 . . . III-B-18
111-8-9 U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH OF
ENERGY QUANTITIES CONSUMED 1975-2000 . . 111-8-20
III-B-1O BEST JUDGMENT OF U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES
OF GROWTH OF PRICES AND QUANTITIES . . . 111-8-21
111-8-11 REGIONAL VS. U.S. AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF PRICE GROWTH, 1960—72 111-8—23
111-8-12 REGIONAL VS. U.S. AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF QUANTITY GROWTH, 1960-72 111-8-24
111-8-13 REGIONAL VS. U.S. AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF PRICE GROWTH, 1974-85 111-8-25
111-8-14 REGIONAL VS. U.S. AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF QUANTITY GROWTH, 1974-85 111-8-26
111-8-15 REGIONAL NATURAL GAS AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF PRICE GROWTH, 1975-85
AND 1975-2000 111-8-28
111-8-16 BEST JUDGMENT OF ORB AVERAGE ANNUAL RATES
OF PRICE AND QUANTITY GROWTH OF ELECTRIC-
ITY AND GAS 1975-85 AND 1975—2000 . . . . III-B-29
Ill—B— v
-------
table
“I-B-li
ORB ELECTRICITY
ORB NATURAL GAS
ORB NATURAL GAS
ORB ELECTRI CITY
1985
III-B—22 ORB ELECTRICITY
2000
111-8-23 ORB NATURAL GAS
1985
111-8—27
111-8—28
111—8—29
PRICES IN YEAR 2000
PRICES IN YEAR 1985
PRICES IN YEAR 2000
CONSU*TION IN YEAR
CONSUIcTION IN YEAR
CONSUMPTION IN YEAR
page
• . . Appendices B, C, D, E
• • Appendices B, C, D, E
• . 111—8—32
• . 111—8—32
• . Appendices B, C, 0, E
• . • Appendices B, C, 0, E
• . . Appendices B, C, 0, E
111-8-35
• . . . 111—8—36
• . . . 111—8—37
• . . • III-B—39
• . . • III-B-40
ORB ELECTRICITY PRICES IN YEAR 1985
111-8—18
11 1—8—19
111—8—20
11 1—8—21
111-8-24 ORB NATURAL GAS CONSU1 TI0N IN YEAR
2000
111—8—25
111-8—26
. Appendices B, C, 0, E
MOUNT, CHAPMAN, TYRRELL COEFFICIENTS
VALUES OF s AND S •
PRICE-BASED PROJECTIONS, 1985
QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS, 1985
QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS, 2000
111—8—vi
-------
APPENDI CES
A. PEAK LOAD PRICING MODEL
B. ILLINOIS
C. INDIANA
0. KENTUCKY
E. OHIO
hI—B—vu
page
111—8—43
hII-B-47
hII—B—99
111-8—141
111—8—183
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The ultimate objective of the analysis is to compare estimated future
demand for electricity in the Ohio River Basin (ORB) with projected pro-
duction of the same in years 1985 and 2000. Two future production esti-
mates have been used in the Ohio River Basin Energy Study (ORBES); i.e.,
Ford Foundation Technical Fix (TF) and Bureau of Mines (BOM) projections,
authored by Dupree and Corsentino. The former were derived from an eco-
nomic model of the economy, including prices as explicit variables, but
with a specific policy of growth limitation assumed. The latter were
based on in-depth knowledge of past trends in the energy industry, but
without explicit consideration of prices or economy-wide growth.
The analysis to follow applies various approaches to the estimation
of demand for electricity and gas in the ORB region in 1985 and 2000. The
demand projections are based on (1) growth rates from various economy-wide
models, corrected to apply to the Bureau of Census regions including ORB;
and (2) price projections based on the same economy-wide models, applied
to demand elasticities. Demand projections so determined are then com-
pared with the TF and BOM projections. Demand measures benefits at the
projected price and quantity levels. The TF and BOM projections give a
basis for cost determination. It is not necessary to explicitly find
costs, however, since they are implied by prices on which the demand pro-
jections are based. Given these conditions, it follows that if demands
are greater than (or equal to) the supplies projected by TF or BOM, then
the benefits exceed the costs; otherwise, riot.
The analysis proceeds in three major steps. First, the data base and
historic economy-energy growth trends in the United States are reviewed.
Second, specific application of economy-energy growth trends is made to
ORB. Third, the results are reviewed and conclusions drawn in the light
of various qualifications, including export of energy from ORB and load
management utility pricing. Although the major emphasis is on electric
power, a certain amount of information is developed with respect to natural
gas. The latter is a substitute energy source for electricity and is the
subject of demand forecasts designed to take account of the effects of gas
prices on electric power consumption.
1 1 1-B— i
-------
2. HISTORIC SURVEY
It is convenient to divide the energy economy of the United States
into four time periods. The first extends from 1880 to 1920; the second
from 1920-47; the third from 1947-73; and the fourth is the remainder of
the present century. The present historic survey emphasizes the first
three and prepares the way for consideration of the fourth.
2.1 THE FIRST 40 YEARS, 1880-1920
During the first 40 years, the Gross National Product (GNP) increased
by a factor of 3.84, but energy input, excluding fuel wood, increased by
the greater factor of 9.3 (1, p. 145, 158). The corresponding average
annual rates of growth are approximately 3.4 percent for GNP and 5.6 per-
cent for energy consumption. This period was characterized by technolog-
ical change in which energy was substituted for labor and capital, though
at a reduced rate as the year 1920 was approached.
2.2 THE REVERSAL, 1920-1947
In the period from 1920 to 1947, the relative rates of growth were
reversed. The GNP grew by a factor of 3.12, which corresponds to an
average growth rate of 3.8 percent per year, while energy input grew by a
factor of 1.72 or an annual average of 1.8 percent (1, p. 145). Thus the
year 1920 marks the point in U.S. economic development when the technology
of energy use shifted from increasing to decreasing intensivity per unit
of output.
Several phenomena gave rise to this result. In the first place, the
composition of GNP changed. Mining and manufacturing accounted for a
larqer share of GNP in the 1880—1920 period than in the post 1920 period.
These are energy-intensive activities. A shift in the composition of out-
put from mining and manufacturing to less energy-intensive outputs, such
as services, thus accounted in part for the trend in energy usage. But
all services are not sparing of energy. Transportation, in particular,
is energy intensive.
A second economy-wide phenomenon is the efficiency with which labor
and capital inputs are used. Fabricant reports that total output per unit
of labor and capital grew by an annual average rate of 1 .3 percent from
1889 to 1919 and by 2.1 percent between 1919 and 1957 (2, p. 11). It
seems reasonable to hypothesize that improvements in the technology of the
use of energy were a part of the efficiency gains noted by Fabricant. The
improvement in the efficiency of labor and capital between Fabricant’s two
periods corresponds to a comparable improvement in the efficiency of energy
use between approximately corresponding periods as reported by Schurr
et al., though in the latter case the efficiency shift led to
a reversal of GNP output per unit energy input.
III—B—3
-------
Schurr et al. cite two technological changes that un-
doubtedly played an important part in the process; i.e., the use of elec-
tricity and the internal combustion engine. Consider energy in three
forms: (1) as electric power, (2) as internal combustion fuels, and (3)
all other energy, mainly industrial process and space heat. In 1955,
eleven times as many kilowatt hours of electricity were produced as in
1920 and fifteen times as much internal combustion fuel was used;- while
the third category grew by less than 50 percent (1, p. 176). By 1955,
electricity and internal combustion fuels accounted for 20 percent each
of input Btu, while the “all other” category accounted for 60 percent
(1, p. 175).
Increases in the use of electricity resulted in improvements in di-
rect thermal efficiency as compared with mechanical power from centrally
driven prime movers In industrial establishments. Even more important,
shop organization and job layout were freed from the spatial constraints
of shafts and belt systems. The locational flexibility of electric-power
motors led to industrial efficiency attributable to the way energy is used
with, of course, corresponding beneficial effects on the GNP-energy ratio.
Similar changes occurred with the internal combustion engine. The latter
brought greater thermal efficiency to transportation and, in addition,
indirectly increased productivity on the farm, reduced costs of inventory
management, reduced comuter time, and in other ways improved the flexi-
bility with which power could be used throughout the economic system.
Important as the preceding changes are, the absolute size of the “all
other” energy category assured that changes there had an important effect
on aggregate statistics. Insofar as process and space heat are concerned
--the most important components of this category--a conversion from coal
to oil and gas improved overall conversion efficiencies from something in
the range of 50 percent to 65 percent or more. The category is too het-
erogeneous to generalize about other effects, though, of course, the
phasing out of the industrial shop prime mover and the steam locomotive
led to significant gains in the average thermal efficiency of the “all
other group as a whole.
2.3 THE POST WORLD—WAR II PERIOD, 1947-73
The third phase deals with energy and economic growth since World War
II, up to the time of the Arab oil embargo and the increasing focus of
public attention on energy policy.
In considering this period, it is desirable to separate three energy
streams. First is the energy inputs, as used in previous analysis. Sec-
ond and third, two streams of outputs will be considered. Energy end
products are energy products purchased directly by households, such as
gasoline, electricity, or natural gas, plus the same products purchased by
coninercial establishments. The third stream is energy purchased for in-
dustrial processing.
III-B-4
-------
Energy inputs measured in Btu grew at an average of 3.6 percent per
annum, as compared with a 3.7 percent average real GNP growth rate (3).
Domestic production of energy inputs, however, grew over the 1947-73 pe-
riod at only 2.8 percent per year (3). The difference was imports. The
United States went from a slight export excess in the immediate post-
World War II years to significant net imports by 1973.
The growth of energy inputs and GNP at approximately the same rates
might seem to imply a departure from the efficiency gains of the 1920-50
period; in point of fact, it does not. If we consider only industrial
uses of energy, efficiency gains were quite marked. Industrial output,
as measured by the Federal Reserve Board index of industrial production,
grew at an annual average rate of 4.5 percent while inputs to industry in-
creased at only 1.5 percent. In calculating energy inputs to industry,
that share of electricity consumed by industry plus processed fuels pro-
duced by refineries, are reckoned at the levels of energy inputs to the
electric power plants and to the refineries. Hence, gains in electric
power efficiency and improvements in refinery operation contribute to the
rather impressive overall improvement in productivity.
The reason that energy consumption for the economy as a whole showed
an energy input growth rate almost equal to that of the real GNP is that
consumption of energy end products increased more rapidly than GNP, at an
annual rate of 5 to 6 percent in the immediate post-World War II years
and 4.5 percent from 1953-1973. By 1967, energy end products accounted
for 56.1 percent of the use (measured in Btu) of all energy inputs. The
growth in energy end products reflected more household consumption attend-
ing a higher standard of living, especially increased private transporta-
tion by automobile. Note also that conr ercia1 uses of motor vehicles fall
in this category, whether such use is by common carrier or private fleet.
Prior to World War II, there had, of course, been household and commercial
uses of energy. These were not distinguished from other uses and may have
exerted a depressing influence on productivity gains, depending on rela-
tive productivity in the household and consumption sectors as compared
with the industrial sector. But there was no question in the post-World
War II period. Productivity gains were clearly smaller and the expansion
of consumption for new purposes, regardless of productivity, caused higher
growth rates in the household—commercial sector.
2.4 THE FUTURE
The future of energy consumption is bound to differ from its past.
For the first time in man’s economic history, real costs and real prices
(prices corrected for inflation) of certain energy sources are increasing.
Industrial trends in the reduced use of energy per unit of output (greater
energy efficiency) can be expected to accelerate. Whether there will be
a reversal in energy end—use trends is another matter. Increasing real
income leads to increasing energy consumption, though at a less than pro-
portional rate, for given energy prices (4, Ch. 5). But, of course, real
prices are increasing. The question is whether they are increasing fast
enough to bring an absolute reduction in energy end use.
III—B—5
-------
The answer varies by energy source. The “age of fluid fuels,” to use
Harrison Brown’s term, is on the wane. But the age of government price
setting is not. tf market forces were given full sway, real prices would
be higher than at present for both crude oil and natural gas. Usage of
these energy sciurces would be slowed and the likelihood of absolute de-
crease in consumption greater. Instead, federal policies impair price
adjustments and introduce uncertainty into the forecasting process. We
shall conclude that natural gas, but not crude oil, consumption will de-
crease in both the year 1985 and year 2000 projections.
On the other hand, as we shall see, there is every reason to think
that real costs and prices of electric power will change very little or
even decrease in the decades ahead. The implied result is a comparative
shift in consumption from oil and gas to electric power-intensive uses.
Exactly where and how this will take place is beyond the scope of the
present investigation.
The most reliable sources of projections are those based on economy-
wide models, and greatest reliance is placed on the same in the chapters
to follow. With past trends for some fuels subject to reversal and real
costs increasing, a comprehensive analysis is called for. Fortunately,
a comprehensive approach has been taken by a number of analysts. We
shall note their results in attempting to evaluate the energy future of
the Ohio River Basin.
111-8—6
-------
RE FERENCES
1. S. H. Schurr et al., Energy in the American Economy . Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins Press, 1960.
2. S. Fabricant. Basic Facts on Productivity Change . Occassionál Paper
63: National Bureau of Economic Research. New York, 1959.
3. C. Gehman. ‘U.S. Energy Supplies and Uses,’ 1 Federal Reserve Bulletin .
Washington, December, 1973.
4. Ford Foundation Energy Policy P’roject, A Time to Choose . Ballinger
Publishing Company, 1974.
111—8—7
-------
3. REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Regional energy growth is, of course, a part of national energy
growth. Much of the analysis of regional growth is based on extrapolation
from national projections. The Federal Energy Administration (FEA) has
made both regional and national projections. The latter, combined with
historic regional—national relationships, provide the bases for such
extrapolation.
The analysis proceeds in the following three major steps:
1. Data base, Tables 111-8—1—5;
2. Price and quantity growth rates, 1975-85 and 1975-2000; Tables
III—B—6—lO;
3. Regional adaptations of price and quantity growth rates, Tables
III—B—l l—16.
Data are collected at the county level, though the results are deemed
significant only for aggregates of these. Counties within the Ohio River
Basin (ORB) are aggregated in the following three groups for each of the
four ORBES states: (1) plant counties, those in which plants to be con-
structed in the Bureau of Mines (BOM) scenario from 1985 to 2000 are loca-
ted; (2) Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs) in the ORB region,
excluding those already represented among the plant counties; and (3) other
ORB counties not included in either of the two preceding groups. A fourth
category was included for each state; i.e., all non—ORB counties. This
last category was needed to bridge the gap between ORB data and some data
that are given only as state totals. Since the entire state of Kentucky
is included in the ORB region, there are no counties in this last category
in Kentucky.
3.2 DATA BASE
The data are given in Tables 111-8-1-5. Except for Table III-B-2,
these are too voluminous to include in the text. Tables 1 1 1-B-I, 111-8—3,
111-8—4, and III-B—5 appear in Appendices B, C, D, and E, where they are
listed by states. Exact documentary sources are given with the tables.
Energy data (Tables III-B-l-4) are for 1974; economic data (Table 111-8-5)
are for 1972.
Electricity prices by state, county, and customer class are given in
Table 111-B-i. These were obtained from U.S. Federal Power Comission
records of typical electric bills. They are prices in existence on Janu-
ary 1, 1974, for specific levels of consumption as shown in the table.
Since electric power prices are based on declining block rates, it is
necessary to select particular levels of consumption for each customer
class. The levels chosen were near the average consumption in each case.
111—8—9
-------
It is possible that a small error might be introduced in any projections
by an increase in the average consumption in each customer class, on the
assumption that declining block structures continue into the future. There
is ample reason to think, however, on the basis of information given in
Section 3.3,. below, that block rates will be subject to diminished differ-
entials in the future, or will be phased out in favor of rates that do not
vary with the volume of consumption.
Electricity prices in Table I l l-B—i were associated with counties by
identifying particular towns to which the prices apply. That is to say,
the Federal Power Coimiission’s survey of typical bills gives results by
towns, not by counties. The former were translated to counties by identi-
fing towns within counties. In counties with no towns large enough to be
listed, state average prices were used. Or, in towns where comercial or
industrial service was not great enough to contain any instances of bills
at the selected comercial and industrial levels, state average coniner-
cial or industrial rates were used at these levels.
Gas prices for the fourth quarter 1974 are given in Table 111-8-2.
These are for key metropolitan areas, selected so as to represent the ORB
region within each state. Gas prices were not available at more detailed
levels.
Table 111-8-2
NATURAL GAS PRICES BY KEY METROPOLITAN AREA OF ORB STATES
FOURTH QUARTER, 1974
DOLLARS PER MILLION Btu
Customer Class
Residential Con!nerciala Industrialb
Illinois
(Peoria) 1.26 1.21 1.02
Indiana
(Indianapolis) 1.02 1.07 0.81
Kentucky
(Ashland) 1.22 1.19 1.02
Ohio
(Columbus) 1.21 1.22 1.04
(a) Prices listed represent midpoints for ranges of prices given in the
Source.
(b) Prices listed are midpoints for ranges of prices for firm (not in-
terruptible) industrial supply.
SOURCE: Foster Associates, personal coninunication.
111-8-10
-------
Quantities of electricity consumed, to the nearest 1 ,000 megawatt
hours, in 1974, are shown in Table 111-8—3 by state, county and customer
class. Also shown are quantities generated. It is interesting to compare
tne quantities generated with the quantities consumed in plant counties.
See Table III-B—3A for each state. There is already more generated than
consumed in these counties in Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky.
The source for Table 111-8—3, Energetics (1), gives only the totals
for consumption and generation. Consumption by customer classes was in-
ferred from use factors defined as follows for each of the customer clas-
ses:
• Residential Consumption
Residential use factor, R = Personal Income 1
• Commercial Consumption
Commercial use factor, C = Retail Sales + (2)
Farm Product Sales
Industrial Consumption
Industrial use factor, I = Value Added
Numerical values were obtained for each of the above use factors for each
of the four states. These factors were then used with the values in the
denominator for each county to get estimates of residential, commercial,
and industrial consumption (in megawatt hours) in that county. These es-
timates were totaled by county and the totals compared with the totals
shown in Energetics for each of the same counties. Where any differences
were found, the customer classes were adjusted upward or downward by the
same fraction in each county so as to make the totals for the customer
classes equal to that in Energetics . In fact, there should have been no
differences, because Energetics reports that the county totals given there-
in were calculated in the first place by the same procedure in reverse,
beginning with state totals by customer classes (1, p. 24—25).
Table III-B—4 qives qas consumption by state, county, and customer
class in billions of Btu in 1974. Exactly the same method of calculation
was used here as in Table 111-8—3. Enerqetics gives county totals. These
were divided into residential, commercial, and industrial consumption with
the help of use factors as defined in Eqs. (1), (2), and (3), followed by
the same method of reconciliation, except that in the case of natural gas,
the amount used in electric power generation stations of capacity greater
than 25 MW was known and was allocated by the county independently of the
amounts assigned to the three customer classes. Also, as in the case of
electricity, the method was identical with that used by Energetics in get-
ting county totals in the first place (1, p. 22).
Table 111-8-5 shows state and county values for the economic variables
used in the denominators of Eqs. (1), (2), and (3). Personal income is ob-
tained by multiplying the per capita income from column (1) by the popu-
lation in column (2).
1 1 1—B—il
-------
3.3 NATIONAL GROWTH RATES
Projected price growth rates in constant dollars, or real prices, are
shown In Table 111-8-6 for the period 1975—85 and in Table III-B-7 for the
period 1975—2000. Both tables report the results of different studies in
which models of the U.S. economy were used. Thus, projected price growth
rates of energy products take account not only of expected conditions in
energy markets, but also of expected conditions in all other markets.
Growth rates in both Tables 111-8-6 and Table 111-8-7 are expressed
as annual average rates and must be compounded in going from the initial
to the terminal year. They do not necessarily give correct estimates for
intervening years. Thus, comparison of rates in Table 111-8-6 with those
in Table 111-8-7 shows differences for the same energy source and study.
Consider Table III-B—6. Three studies are shown, in Parts A, B, and
C, respectively. These are given in the sequence in which the studies
were published. Part A is the Ford Foundation study, from which two sets
of real price projections are reported. The first is based on historic
demand and supply relationships, not historic growth rates. Natural gas,
for example, is projected to have a very considerable real price increase,
though it has not had such price increases in the decades prior to the
forecast. The technical fix projection (TF) is the same one as used in
ORBES for projecting one of the alternative quantity growth rates. The
technical fix growth path is one generated by public policies that assure
that energy conservation practices and known energy-saving technologies
are incorporated into consumption and production patterns while not chang-
ing existing life styles (2, Ch. 3). More rapid rates of growth of price
are intentionally used as policy measures to help produce the energy-saving
results.
Part B gives the Hudson—Jorgenson (HJ) estimates. The same two
authors played a leading part in making the Ford Foundation estimates.
Hudson—Jorgenson t s base case assumes that traditional supply and demand
relationships prevail into the future. Their “Independence Tax case
assumes that a Btu tax Is imposed sufficient to achieve energy independ-
ence by 1985. As a result of the tax, real prices (including the tax)
increase at more rapid rates.
The third set of projections, in Part C, was made by the U.S. Federal
Energy Aóuinistration (FEA) in its National Energy Outlook . Four FEA
projections are shown. These are the four combinations of Business-As-
Usual (BAU) and Conservation with two sets of crude oil prices, $13/bbl
and $16/bbl. The prices are hypothesized for imported crude oil in 1985,
in 1975 dollars. Imported oil is currently selling at a price near the
low end of the $13 to $16 range per barrel. The FEA scenarios are defined
as follows (3, Appendix E):
BAU Demand——conventional demand analysis uninfluenced by mandatory
conservation actions of government, but does include the price
effect of higher energy prices.
111—8—12
-------
Table 111—8-6
U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF REAL PRICES,
PERCENT PER ANNUM 1975-85
Petroleum Natural
Coal Products Gas Electricity
PART A. FORD FOUNDATION ESTIMATES
Historic Growth 1.78 5 ,74 5.96 -0.90
Technical Fix 2.63 8.38 6.12 4.33
PART B. HUDSON-JORGENSON ESTIMATES
Base Case 3.08 0497 a 2.45 -0.211
Independence Tax 6.36 3 , 44 a 6.10 0.955
PART C. U.S. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION
Busi ness—As—Usual
($13/bbl oil) 2.2 0.70 6.2 2.1
Busi ness—As-Usual
($16/bbl oil) 2.3 2.4 6.2 2.2
Conservation
($13/bbl oil) 2.1 0.62 5.3 1.3
Conservation
($16/bbl oil) 2.3 2.0 5.3 1.3
PART D. REPRESENTATIVE RATES
2-4 2-4 5-6 1-2
(a) Crude petroleum
SOURCE: Part A: Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project, A Time to Choose
(Ballinger, 1974), Appendix F, pp. 498 and 502-3.
Growth rates have been corrected for changes in the
value of the dollar, as given in the same source.
111-8—13
-------
Table 11 1-8-6 (Continued)
Part B: E. A. Hudson and 0. W. Jorgenson, ‘tJ.S. Energy Policy
and Economic Growth, 1975—20OO, ’ Bell Journal of Eco-
nomics and Management Science , Vol. 5 (Autumn, 1974),
p. 493 for base case, Tables 1, 9, 20, and 21 combined
to deduce effects of independence tax. Undeflated
rates are corrected for changes in the value of the dol-
1 ar.
Part C: U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy
Outlook (1976). Business—As—Usual ( $13/bbl oil) case ,
Appendfx C, p. 25. The other three cases were calcu-
lated by working back from 1985 prices (in 1975 dollars)
for the Business-As—Usual ($13/bbl oil) case with growth
rates for that case to get 1974 prices. These were com-
pared with 1985 prices i n the other three cases, as
given in Appendix G. Prices per barrel of oil refer to
import prices assumed to hold (in 1975 dollars) in 1985.
Part D: Inferences based on judgment from rates shown in Parts
A, B, and C.
111-8—14
-------
BAU Supply——assumes decontrol of old oil and deregulation plus a se-
ries of moderate conventions with respect to oil, gas, coal, and
nuclear power. Electricity peak demand grows one half a percent
faster than average demand and a small synthetic fuels effort is
mounted before 1985.
Conservation Demand——in the field of transportation, a specific sched-
ule for improvements of automobile efficiency, incentives for a
national van pool program, and a change in Civil Aeronautics Board-.
regulations to increase airline load factors from 55 to 65 percent
are all assumed. Various thermal efficiency standards and tax
benefits for buildings are adopted, together with appliance effi-
ciency improvements and mandatory labelling, elimination of gas
pilot lights on new appliances, and mandatory retrofit of certain
residential heating systems. In the industrial sector there is
an expanded energy accounting and reporting system, with technical
assistance programs and efficiency guidelines for selected indus-
trial equipment. Electric utilities are given incentives to stim-
ulate load management actions designed to keep peak load growth
one percent below total load growth.
Conservation Supply- — same as BAU supply
A considerable range of growth rates is observable for the same fuels
in Table III-B-6. Consider first the Historic Growth, Base, and Business-
As-Usual cases. These areall intended to reflect the assumption of no
changes in energy policies from those existing in mid 1975, either by U.S.
or foreign governments, over the forecast period. There are both agree-
ments and disagreements. Electricity prices are expected to grow the
least and natural gas prices the most, except in the Hudson-Jorgenson Base
Case, where coal price growth exceeds natural gas price growth. Petroleum
products grow by relatively small rates in the two more recent studies
(Parts B and C) but at a rapid rate in Part A, doubtless because the ana-
lysis was conducted prior to the radical price increases in crude oil in
late 1973-early 1974 period.
Note the difference in the relative price growth rates of the BAU
and conservation scenarios in the Ford and HJ fdrecasts,on the one hand,
and the FEA forecasts, on the other. In the HJ forecast, the Btu tax helps
drive up the energy prices. In the Ford forecast, petroleum products are
driven up in price by unfavorable domestic supply conditions combined with
restrictions on imports, while recent reductions in electric power pro-
ductivity are assumed to continue and to drive up electric power prices.
Increased prices of these energy sources work their way through the econ-
omy. The result is to produce an overall energy input rate of 1.6 percent
per year as compared with 3.5 percent in the BAU case. (These last figures
are not shown in Table III-B-6.) In contrast, the causation runs the
other way, from conservation demand, in the case of the FEA forecasts.
(See the previous definitions of FEA conservation demand and supply.)
Hence, price growth rates are lower for the FEA conservation cases than
111-8—15
-------
for the corresponding BAU cases. Needless to say, economy-wide infla-
tionary effects (not shown) are also lower in the FEA scenarios.
Which cause and effect is likely to dominate is not only a matter of
public policy, but also of the real scarcity. situation. The writer holds
that the Ford-HJ cause and effect is the more likely to dominate, even
though some lowering of demand by voluntary and mandatory conservation ef-
forts will probably also take place.
The last line of Table 111-8-6 shows representative rates that will
be used at a later point for calculating plausible figures for real price
growth. These rates were chosen by a subjective selection from among the
rates shown, with special emphasis on the H—J and FEA forecasts, which are
clearly based on post-embargo conditions, and with consideration for the
probable greater importance of supply constriction than autonomous demand
decline in producing conservation.
Table 111-8—7 follows the same pattern as Table 111-8—6 but applies
to the time period 1975-2000. As with Table 111-8-6, the growth rates are
intended to characterize the relationship between the initial and terminal
years only. No FEA forecasts were available for the year 2000, for which
the Hudson—Jorgenson estimates include only the base case. A new study,
by Nordhaus, is added.
Nordhaus’ growth rates were given for the time span 1970 to 2010.
They are here interpreted to apply to the period 1975-2000. Nordhaus’
model is not of the entire economy, but only energy demand and supply, sub-
divided by energy sectors. The rest of the economy is treated in such a
way as to make this possible. Productivity trends are included in the
analysis and environmental protection is explicitly recognized as a con—
st ner of resources, at the levels of environmental protection envisaged
in 1973. Only Nordhaus’ base case is reported. He also investigates the
cost of energy independence, but does not give price growth rates or enough
information to infer growth rates.
Comparing the representative rates in Tables 111-8-6 and 11 1-B— i, it
will be seen that coal and electricity real prices are expected to grow at
the same rates in both 1975-85 and 1975-2000. However, petroleum product
prices are expected to grow relatively more rapidly toward the end of the
time period to the year 2000 and natural gas prices to grow relatively more
rapidly in the more inriediate time horizon of the decade 1975-85.
Tables 111-8—8 and 111—8—9 give quantity growth rates, again as an-
nual averages. Parts A, B, and C of Table 111-8-8 give quantity growth
rates drawn from the same models as the real price growth rates in the same
parts of Table 111—8-6. Part D gives the Bureau of Mines (BOM) projections,
which, as previously noted, are used to get a second reference point (along
with the IF projections) for ORBES. The BOM projections are of approxi-
mately the same vintage as the FEA forecasts but differ in that they are
not based on economic analysis. In contrast to the other three, the Bureau
of Mines forecasts are simply physical projections based on past and
111-8—16
-------
Table 111-8—7
U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF REAL PRICES,
PERCENT PER ANNUM 1975—2000
Petroleum Natural
Coal Products Gas Electricity
PART A. NORDHAUS ESTIMATES
Base Case 0.7 46 a 39 1.1
PART B. FORD FOUNDATION ESTIMATES
Historic Growth 5.72 4.54 4.94 2.53
Technical Fix 7.52 6.11 6.41 5.66
PART C. HUDSON-JORGENSON ESTIMATES
Base Case 2.69 070 a 2.82 -0.22
PART D. REPRESENTATIVE RATES
2-4 3-5 3-5 1-2
(a) Crude petroleum
SOURCE: Part A: W. 0. Nordhaus, The Allocation of Energy Resources,”
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity , Vol. 3 (1973),
pp. 555—6.
Part B: Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project, A Time to Choose
(Ballinger, 1974), Appendix F, pp. 498 and 502-3.
Growth rates have been corrected for changes in the
value of the dollar, as given in the same source.
Part C: E. A. Hudson and 0. W. Jorgenson, “U.S. Energy Policy
and Economic Growth, 1975-2000,” Bell Journal of Eco-
nomics and Management Science , Vol. 5 (Autumn, 1974),
p. 490. Undeflated rates are corrected for changes in
the value of the dollar.
Part 0: Inferences based on judgment from rates shown in Parts
A, B, and C.
111-8—17
-------
Table 111-8-8
U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF QUANTITIES OF Btus CONSUMED
PERCENT PER ANNUM 1975—1 985
Petroleum Natural
Coal Products Gas. Electricity.
PART A. FORD FOUNDATION ESTIMATES
Historic Growth 3.4 12 3.4 6.6
Technical Fix 2.8 —1.0 2.8 3.3
PART B. HUDSON-JORGENSON ESTI MATES
Base Case 2.2 28 a 1.6
Independence Tax 1.7 0 • 75 a -1.2 4.9
PART C. U.S. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION
Business-As-Usual
($13/bbl oil) 5.4 2.2 1.0 5.7
Business—As—Usual
($l6fbbl oil) 5.9 1.5 1.0 5.9
Conservation
($l3/bbl oil) 5.1 0.4 0.6 5.6
Conservation
($16/bbl oil) 4.4 2.8 —1.0 2.2
PART 0. BUREAU OF MINES (DUPREE-CORSENTINO) ESTIMATES
4.4 2.8 -1.0 2.2
PART E. REPRESENTATIVE RATES
3—5 1-2 1—2 4—6
(a) Crude petroleum
111-8-18
-------
Table 111-8-8 (Continued)
SQURCEI: Part A: Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project, A Time to Choose
(Ballinger, 1974), Appendix F, pp. 498 and 502-3.
Part B: E. A. Hudson and D. W. Jorgenson, “U.S. Energy Policy
and Economic Growth, 1975-2000,” Bell Journal of Eco-
nomics and Management Science , Vol. 5 (Autumn, 1974),
pp. 492, 509.
Part C: U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Out-
look (1976). Growth rates for all four cases are found
by comparing 1974 and 1985 quantities in Appendix G.
Part D: U. G. Dupree, Jr. and J. S. Corsentino, United States
Energy Through the Year 2000 (Revised) , U.S. Depart-
ment of the Interior, Bureau of Mines (December, 1975),
p. 28.
Part E: Inferences based on judgment from rates shown in Parts
A, B, C, and D.
III—B—19
-------
Table 111-8—9
U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF QUANTITITES OF Btus CONSUtED
PERCENT PER ANNUM 1975-2000
Petrol eLnn Natural
Coal Products Gas Electricity
PART A FORD FOUNDATION ESTIMATES
Historic Growth 3.8 2.1 2.2 5.6
Technical Fix 2.6 0.27 1.3 2.7
PART B. HUDSON-JORGENSON ESTIMATES
Base Case 2.7 22 a 1.1 5.1
PART C. BUREAU OF MINES (DUPREE-CORSENTINO) ESTIMATES
3.7 1.5 —0.49 5.9
PART D. REPRESENTATIVE RATES
2-4 1-2 1—2 3—6
(a) Crude petroleum
SOURCE: Part A: Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project, A Time to Choose
(Ballinger, 1974), Appendix F, pp. 498 and 502-3.
Part B: E. A. Hudson and 0. W. Jorgenson, “U.S. Energy Policy
and Economic Growth, 1975—2000,” Bell Journal of Eco-
nomics and Management Science , Vol. 5 (Autumn, 1974),
p. 492.
Part C: W. G. Dupree, Jr. and J. S. Corsentino, United States
Energy Through the Year 2000 (RevIsed) , U.S. Depart-
ment of the Interior, Bureau 0 f Mines (December, 1975),
p. 29.
Part D: Inferences based on jud ent from rates shown in Parts
A, B, C, and D.
111—8—20
-------
expected future trends in the energy industries. The authors, Dupree and
Corsentino, give no alternatives for the BOM forecasts. They are here in-
terpreted as expected results of policies in existence in 1975, when they
were developed. No distinction is made in either Tables 111-8-8 or 111-8-9
between crude and refined petroleum. Both grow at substantially the same
rates in any one analysis.
Table 111—8—9 is related to 111-8—8 as Table 111-8—7 was related to
111-8—6. FEA estimates were not made for the period 1975-2000 and hence
do not appear in Table 111-8—9. The quantity growth rates in Parts Aand
B of Table 111-8—9 are drawn from the same models as the real price growth
rates in Parts B and C of Table 111-8-7. A comparison of the representa-
tive rates shown in Tables III-B—8 and 111-8-9 shows continuous slow growth
expected in consumption of petroleum products and natural gas in both the
1975—85 and 1975—2000 time spans. Electricity and coal are expected to
have more rapid growth over the entire period to the year 2000, but espe-
cially in the decade ending in 1985.
Table 111-8—10 gives the author’s best judgment of annual rates of
growth of real prices and quantities for selected years and energy sources,
as drawn from previous analysis of Tables III-B-6-9. Single figures,
rather than ranges of figures, appear in each cell, but no more precision
is to be implied than suggested by the previous ranges of “representative
rates.” Table III-B-lO serves to suninarize the projections for future ref-
erence.
Table 111-8—10
BEST JUDGMENT
U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Petroleum Natural
Coal Products Gas Electricity
PART A. 1975-1985
Real Prices 2.2 2.0 5.5 1.5
Quantities 5.7 1.0 0.8 5.7
PART B. 1975-2000
Real Prices 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.5
Quantities 2.7 2.2 1.1 5.1
111-8—21
-------
3.4 REGI ONAL GROWTH RATES
Regional projections are not available for the boundaries of the Ohio
River Basin as defined in the present study. They are available, however,
for two Census Divisions, East North Central and East South Central, which,
between them, include ORB. These two Census Divisions are defined as the
following states :
East North Central (ENC) East South Central (ESC)
Ohio Kentucky
Indiana Tennessee
Illinois Alabama
Michigan Mississippi
Wisconsin
FEA projections to 1985 for these two Census Divisions will be used
as a basis for estimating growth in price and demand for ORB. The esti-
mates will be made in two steps. Tables 111-8—11 and 111-8—12 give the
historic (1960—72) price and quantity growth rates for East North Central
and East South Central compared with the United States as a whole. Tables
111-8—13 and 111-8—14 give the same as projected by FEA to 1985.
Consider Tables 111-8—li and 111-8-12. As shown in Table 111-8—11,
for most energy sources and in all three customer classes, historic real
price trends have been downward. In the residential sector, ENC plus ESC
(ORB) has been roughly at the national rate for natural gas, but has not
experienced quite the national decline in petroleum products and electric-
ity prices. Despite these facts, residential consumption of all three
energy sources has increased at rates comparable to the national average,
treating ENC and ESC together (see Table 111-8—12).
In the ENC and ESC comercial sectors, prices have gone down only for
gas and electricity. But rates of growth in consumption have increased
markedly for all three energy sources, in the U.S. and in ENC-ESC. Simi-
lar observations apply in the industrial sector, although here it appears
that a significantly greater than U.S. average increase took place in nat-
ural gas consumption in ENC—ESC in 1960—72, (see Tables 111-B-li and
111-8—12).
Now, consider projections to 1985, as shown in Tables 111-8-13 and
111-8-14. No decreases in real prices are expected, except, interestingly
enough, in ENC, where a very slight downward movement of electricity real
price is projected in the residential and connercial customer sectors.
Real prices of natural gas are expected to rise in ENC-ESC for residential
and industrial consumption, but not as much as in the nation. The same is
probably true in the industrial sector, although a precise statement can-
not be made without quantitatively weighing the separate ENC and ESC Divi-
sions. Growth rates for natural gas decline less in the residential sec-
tor and increase more in the coninercial and industrial sectors of ENC-ESC
than for the nation. In the case of electricity, the situation is mixed,
between ENC and ESC, on the one hand, and among consumer sectors on the
III-B—22
-------
Table 1 11—B—li
REGIONAL VS. U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF REAL PRICES, 1960—72
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Petroleum Natural
Coal Productsa Gas El ectri city
PART A. RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.1 -1.5 -3.4
East South Central -0.7 -1.7 -3.3
U.S. -2.4 -1.6 -4.1
PART B. COMMERCIAL SECTOR
East North Central 0.7 -2.1 -3.7
East South Central 5.6 -1.3 -3.6
U.S. -0.5 -1.4 -4.5
PART C. INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.0 0.0 -2.5 -1.0
East South Central 4.4 -0.4 -0.9 1.6
U.S. 3.2 1.0 -0.5 -1.3
(a) Petroleum products include distillate, residual oil, kerosene, and
liquified gases only.
SOURCE: U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook
(1976), Appendix C, Table l2b.
III—B—23
-------
Table III-B—12
REGIONAL VS. U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF QUANTITIES CONSUMED, 1960-72
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Petroleum Natural
Coal Productsa Gas Electricity
PART A. RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
East North Central -1.5 4.6 7.3
East South Central 4.8 3.0 8.3
U.S. 0.4 4.2 7.7
PART B. COMMERCIAL SECTOR
East North Central 5.4 9.1 8.5
East South Central 25.3 4.8 8.3
U.S. 5.1 6.7 9.7
PART C. INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
East North Central -1.7 -1.2 7.4 4.8
East South Central 2.6 4.0 5.0 2.7
U.S. -0.8 2.6 4.4 5.5
(a) Petroleum products include distillate, residual oil, kerosene, and
liquified gases only.
SOURCE: U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook
(1976), Appendix C, Table 12a.
111-8—24
-------
Table 111-8—13
REGIONAL VS. U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF REAL PRICES, 1974-85
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Petroleum Natural
Coal. Productsa Gas Electricity
PART A. RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.0 4.5 -0.5
East South Central 1.0 4.6 1.5
U.S. 1.5 5.7 1.3
PART B. COMMERCIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.0 5.4 -0.8
East South Central 1.1 5.8 1.8
U.S. 1.4 6.8 0.5
PART C. INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
East North Central 3.3 0.0 4.5 1.7
East South Central -1.9 2.2 7.2 4.6
U.S. 2.2 0.8 7.0 3.4
(a) Distillate price used for regional calculation in residential and
commercial sector; residual price used for calculation in indus-
trial sectors.
SOURCE: U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook
(1976), Appendix C, Table 13b.
111-8—25
-------
Table III-B—14
REGIONAL VS. U.S. ANNUAL AVERAGE
RATES OF GROWTH OF QUANTITIES CONSUMED, 1974-85
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Petroleum Natural
Coal Products Gas Electricity
PART A. RESIDENTIAL SECTOR
East North Central 2.43 -0.77 8.15
East South Central 2.72 -1.59 6.18
U.S. 3.00 -1.80 7.50
PART B. CO!4€RCIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.80 1.11 3.90
East South Central 2.32 3.10 4.71
U.S. 2.00 0.80 3.90
PART C. INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
East North Central 1.09 2.70 2.43 2.65
East South Central 6.41 5.11 2.10 4.84
U.S. 1.50 2.90 2.1 4.40
SOURCE: US. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook
(1976), Appendix C, Table l3a.
111—8—26
-------
other. No clear statement can be made as to whether ENC-ESC as a whole is
different from the nation in a given sector. Insofar as any conclusion is
possible, it appears that we would not be far wrong to use national price
and growth rates for electricity in ORB.
The case of coal takes on special interest because of the possible.
use of this energy source for the production of synthetic fuels, especially
high and low Btu gas, in ORB. As shown in Table III-B—l3,. the real price
of coal is expected to decline in ESC, although it is expected to rise in
ENC. The expected rate of growth of coal consumption in ESC is shown.(see
Table 111-8—14) to be much above the national average for the period 1975—
85. Prices projected by Foster Associates (4) place both high and low Btu
synthetic gas from Eastern Butimirious coal in the same range as natural
gas in the period 1985 to 2000. Low Btu gas is expected to be produced
by 1985, but high Btu gas is scheduled to come in later.
A comparison is made in Table 1.11-8-15 between the rates of growth of
natural gas prices projected by FEA and those by Foster Associates in the
above—cited study. FEA rates of growth are shown in Column (1). Foster
Associates rates of growth are shown in Columns (2) and (3). Foster con-
siders two cases, regulation and free market; whereas FEA considers only
the continuance of existing public policies; that is to say, regulation.
Table 111—8—15 shows that in all three customer classes, the Foster rates
of growth of real prices are higher for both the regulation and free mar-
ket cases. Rates of growth of real prices are also shown to the year 2000
in the Foster projections, but not in the FEA projections.
Table 111-8—16 gives 9 best judgment 0 rates of growth for both real
prices and quantities in the ORB region. The projections to 1985 are based
on FEA prices and quantities for the average of ENC and ESC. As shown in
Table 111—8—15, the FEA projections might be based on relatively low real
price growth in the case of natural gas. (The Foster Associates report
does not include price projections for electricity.) However, the FEA
projections are used because they were obtained from a model that includes
both price and quantity for all energy sources, including electricity.
Parts C and 0 of Table 111-8-16 give growth rates to the year 2000.
We have no sure way of distinguishing regional from national growth in this-
period. Hence these projections were made by taking the ratio of national
growth rates 1975-2000 over 1975-85 from Table 111-8-10 and applying this
ratio, for the appropriate fuel, to the corresponding rates for 1975-85,
as given in Parts A and B of Table 111-8-16. This approach assumes that
ORB retains the same relation to national growth patterns in 1985-2000 as
it had in 1975-85.
111-8—27
-------
Table 111-8—15
NATURAL GAS AVERAGE ANNUAL
RATES OF GROWTH OF REAL PRICES,
PERCENT PER ANNUM 1975-85 AND 1975-2000
Federal Energy Foster Associates,
Administration Average for Columbus, Ohio,
Average of and St. Louis, Missouri
ENC and ESCa Regulation Free Market
(1) (2). (3)
PART A. RESIDENTIAL
1975—85 4.6 6.5 9.4
1975-2000 4.4 4.3
PART B. COMMERCIAL
1975—85 5.6 6.4 9.2
1975—2000 4.3 5.2
PART C. INDUSTRIAL
1975—85 5.4 8.1 11.4
1975—2000 5.3 6.1
(a) ENC: East North Central
ESC: East South Central
SOURCE: Column (1): Table 111-8—13
Columns (2) and (3): Growth rates calculated from prices given
in Foster Associates, Inc., “Fuel and Energy Price Forecasts,”
Electric Power Research Institute EA—411, Project 759-2 (1977),
Vol. II, p. 99.
111-8—28
-------
Table 1 1 1-8—16
BEST JUDGMENT
ORB ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES OF GROWTH
PERCENT PER ANNUM
Residential Coimiercjal Industrial
PARTA. 1975-85 REAL PRICES
Electricity 0.5 0.5 3.2
Natural Gas 4.6 5.6 5.9
PART 8. 1975-85 QUANTITIES
Electricity 7.2 4.3 3.8
Natural Gas -1.2 2.1 2.3
PART C. 1975-2000 REAL PRICES
Electricity -0.5 -0.5 2.2
Natural Gas 2.1 3.1 3.4
PART 0. 1975—2000 QUANTITIES
Electricity 6.6 3.7 3.2
Natural Gas -0.9 2.4 2.6
SOURCES: Parts A and B: Average rates for East North Central and East
South Central regions from Tables 111-8—13 and
111—8—14.
Parts C and 0: Rates in Parts A and B multiplied by the cor-
responding ratios of national growth rates in
1975—2000 over 1975-85, from Table 111-8-10.
111-8—29
-------
REFERENCES
1. Frank R. Drysdale and Charles E. Calef. The Energetics of the United
States of America: An Atlas . Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1976,
2. Ford Foundation Energy Policy Project, A Time to Choose . BaTlinger
Publishing Company, 1974.
3. U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook .
Washington, 1976.
4. Foster Associates, Inc., Fuel and Energy Price Forecasts . Electric
Power Research Institute, 1977.
III-B—30
-------
4. PROJECTIONS
4.1 PRICE-BASED PROJECTIONS
Real price growth rates from Table III-B-16 are used to calculate
projected prices in 1985 and 2000 for electricity and. natural gas, respec-
tively. The electricity projections are shown in Tables III-B-17 and
111-8—18 (Appendices B through E) by county for the same four groups o f
counties in each state as in Table Ill-B-i. The gas projections are shown
in Tables 111—8—19 and 111-8—20. These are by state, following Table
111-8—2.
Price projections are used to get price—based quantity projections,
with which supply will be compared. There are two possible ways of re-
lating prices to quantities, i.e., by (1) single—equation models and (2)
multiple economy-wide equation models. The price growth rates and the
quantity growth rates reported in Table III-B-16 were chosen in the first
place from economy-wide multiple equation models. Hence, the advantages
of the second approach have already been included in the analysis. Now,
the single—equation approach will be used, in addition, as another way of
translating the price growth rates into quantity growth rates.
A compressive single—equation analysis suitable for our purposes has
been published by Mount, Chapman, and Tyrrell (MCT) (1). In contrast to
most other studies of electric power demand, the MCT analysis gives con-
sistent formulations for the three customer classes, residential, corner-
cial, and industrial. It also reports results by census regions and,
within these, by states, for the three most important independent vari-
ables, population, income, and price of electricity. Other variables are
for the nation as a whole within customer classes, except for the inter-
cept, which is given by census region.
Mount, Chapman, and Tyrrell have a constant elasticity model, a var-
iable elasticity model,and a variable elasticity model with shift para-
meters for such regional variables as climate and degree of urbanization.
The constant elasticity model will be used here. The reason is that the
MCT variable elasticity model introduces the levels of the causal factors
in a way that we shall find mathematically inconvenient for the present
formulation. More specifically, as will be shown below, the causal fac-
tors in the present application are assumed to change in accordance with
growth rates. This necessitates a reformation that is minor with the
constant elasticity model but would not be excessively complex with the
MCT variable elasticity model. Insofar as the shift parameters are con-
cerned, we take these to be adequately represented by the intercepts
which, as noted above, shift with each Census Division.
111—8—31
-------
Table III-B—19
NATURAL GAS PRICES IN ORB COUNTIES BY STATE, 1985
DOLLARS PER MILLION Btu (1974 DOLLARS)
Residential Coninercial Industrial
Illinois
2.09 2.24 1.96
Indiana
1.69 1.98 1.55
Kentucky
2.02 2.20 1.96
Ohio
2.01 2.26 1.99
SOURCE:
Growth rates from Table III-B-16 applied to prices from Table
111—8—2.
Table 111-8—20
NATURAL GAS PRICES IN ORB COUNTIES BY STATE, 2000
DOLLARS PER MILLION Btu (1974 DOLLARS)
Residential Coninercial Industrial
Illinois
2.18 2.71 2.47
Indiana
1.76 2.40 1.96
Kentucky
2.11 2.66 2.47
Ohio
2.09 2.73 2.52
SOURCE: Growth rates from Table 111-8-16 applied to prices from Table
111—8—2.
111—8—32
-------
The MCI constant elasticity regression is
8 3
t t-llt 5t’
where
t is the t- .year,
Q is the quantity of electricity demanded,
V is the level of the r b. (of five) causal factor, and
A, x, • • are parameters found by econometric analysis.
A recursive system such as shown in Eq. (4) would approximate equilibrium
over a long enough period of time for any levels of the causal variables.
However, in a dynamic situation, where the levels of the variables are
changing continuously, the structure of Eq. (4) must be changed. This is
done by substituting for the lagged value To illustrate the princi-
ple, consider the structure of Eq. (4) with only one variable.
= AV AXVlAXV . *AAV (fl l)Q .fl ‘ (5)
or (l+x+x 2 +— •+x 1 ) An
A VtVt_lVt_2 Qt-n (6)
Now, with a given rate of growth, k, per unit time period,
Vt_l = Vte_k
Vt_2 = Vte_ 2 k
v _ 3 =
etc.
then
Qt = A(X )vts(l4x+x 2 +. . . )e .
It can be shown that
n+l
s = 1 + A + + • • . = l _ — (8)
111—8—33
-------
S = x + 2x 2 + 3 + . . . = A(l — x” (n + 1 )
(1 — 1 -
The approach will be to determine the factor by which the quantity at time
t = n (= 1985, 2000) is greater than that in a base period, t = b ( 1974)
for the ORBES section of each state. Thus, equations (7), (8), and (9)
substituted into Eq. (4) with the base period b as period t - n,give
n 0$ as
n 1 11 5 p.. 55
Q
An intuitive discussion of Eq. (10) will describe the process. The
coefficients B. are short—run elasticities. Each of these is weighted for
each year by &< A < 1 to the appropriate power for that year and applied
to the corresponding variable as shown in Eq. (6), above. The effect of
each variable is then represented by the sum of its individual short-term
effects, with account taken for the change in the level of the variable
itself as time passes. Neither b in the base year nor Q in the terminal
year are equilibrium amounts as compared with what these quantities would
be if the variables were to remain for an infinite period of time at their
levels in each of these years.
Values of A, x, and 8 through 35 are given in Table 111-8—25 from
MCT. Values of s and S. defined in Eqs. (8) and (9), are given in Table
111-8-26. Rates of growth of price are from Table 111-8-16. Price-based
projections of demand are given in Table III-B-27. Other sources of data,
where relevant, are noted in the source for Table 111-8-27.
Refer to Table 111-8—27. Demand is given for two sectors; i.e., re-
sidential and coninercial-industrial combined. The reason for combining
the last two is that CMI’S distinction between coninercial and industrial
is not the same as that used herein, on which the Energetics data are
based.
Demand totals are compared with 1985 planned supply. The latter is
calculated from planned capacity. With lead times for power plant con-
struction close to ten years from inception to power generation, coninit-
ments are already made for capacity that will be in existence in 1985.
Two kinds of adjustments were necessary to convert planned megawatts of
capacity to megawatt hours of generation. These are the (1) export factor
and (2) load factor.
The export factor refers to the percentage of power exported. In
three of the four-state ORBES subsectors, more power was generated in 1974
than was used within the subsector. The exact figures are shown in Table
III-8—3C for each of the states. For purposes of calculating megawatt
hours of supply to the subsector, the complement of the export factor, or
the percentage consumed at home, is the more useful concept. The follow-
ing are percentages of generation given over to home consumption:
111—8—34
-------
Table 11 1-8-25
W UNT C hAPMAN 1 TYRREU. COEFFICIENTS
04
A 01 Personal Price of Price of Price of
Census Div. Dimension- Population, Income Pe Electriclt 1 6a , $ Per Appliances,
- Constant less Thousands Capita, $ Ilills/kW-h 1O Therinsa Indexa
Ohio Rb 1.616 0.8859 0.12 0.02 -0.14 0.02 -0.05
cb 1.810 0.8735 0.13 0.11 -0.18 0.01 0
1.618 0.8869 0.12 0.06 -0.21 0 0
Indiana R 1.616 0.8859 0.12 0.02 -0.14 0.02 -0.05
C 1.810 0.8735 0.13 0.11 -0.17 0.01 0
‘-4
1
1 1.618 0.8869 0.12 0.06 -0.23 0 0
Illinois K 1.616 0.8859 0.12 0.02 -0.14 0.02 -0.05
(&)
(31 C 1.810 0.8735 0.13 0.12 -0.19 0.01 0
1 1.618 0.8869 0.12 0.05 -0.23 0 0
Kentucky K 1.623 0.8859 0.11 0.02 -0.14 0.02 -0.05
C 1.754 0.8735 0.13 0.10 -0.14 0.01 0
I 1.648 0.8869 0.13 0.07 -0.18 0 0
(a) 1970 dollars
(b) K: residential
C: coninercial
I: industrial
SOURCE: Mount, 1.0, Chapman, 1. 0., and Tyrrell, 1. L., “Electricity Demand in the United States: An Econometric Analy-
sis.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1973 (NSF/EP-49).
-------
Table 111-8—26
VALUES OF s AND S
(n = 10)
A
S
S
Residential
0.8859
6.155
24.67
Comercial
0.8735
5.861
22.61
Industrial
0.8869
6.179
24.84
SOURCE: Calculation based on Eqs. (8) and (9).
111—8—36
-------
Table 111—8—27
PRICE-BASED PROJECTIONS,
ORBES COUNTIES BY STATE
1985
(THOUSANDS OF MEGAWATT HOURS)
calculation based on Eq. (10) using coefficients from
111—8—25 and III-B-26, plus the following:
(population): Table 11-8-2-1 ORBES Report
(per capita income): Table 111-8-5 with 2.7 percent annual
growth, U.S. F.E.A., National Energy Outlook (1976), p.
C-22, Table 9b.
V 3 (price of electricity): Tables 111—8—i, 111-8-16, and
111-8—17.
V 4 (price of gas): Table 111-8-2, 111-8—16, and III-B—19.
V 5 (appliance prices): Survey of Current Business , trends of
1960-74 extrapolated.
Supply calculation based on Table 1 g/h—16 ORBES Task 1 Report
with export factors and load factors calculated as described
in the text.
Demand
Coniiiercial +
Industrial
Supply,
Planned,
Total
Residential
Total
Illinois
12,562
17,161
29,723
29,480
Indiana
18,705
29,400
48,105
65,477
Kentucky
19,258
32,852
52,110
75,976
Ohio
34,327
55,140
89,467
149,606
SOURCE: Demand
Tables
Vi
V 2
111—8—37
-------
Illinois ORBES Counties: 29.5%
Indiana ORBES Counties: 69.7%
Kentucky ORBES Counties: 81 .5%
Ohio ORBES Counties: 116.5%
Thus, net exports are more then 70 percent of the power generated in
Illinois-ORBES. In Indiana net exports are about 30 percent; in.Kentucky,
about 20 percent; and in Ohio—ORBES, there are net imports; i.e., 16.5
percent more power is consumed than is generated. In order to estimate
local planned supply, the same percentages were assumed to hold in 1985.
Second, a target load factor of 67 percent was assumed for 1985. The
1975 load factor was 61 percent (2, p. 236). FEA regards a 67 percent
load factor as attainable in 1985 with reasonable load management tech-
niques (2, p. 237). (A model of peak load pricing for the purpose is in-
cluded in Appendix A, below.)
On the supply side, there is the question of a reserve margin. Nor-
mal practice is to allow 20 percent. FEA reports that in recent years
excess reserves have been 14 percent above the traditional 20 percent (2,
p. 222). The reasons for this are not clear. Large units (600 MW and
above) installed today are less reliable than in the past (3, pp. 18-20).
It is also, of course, possible that capacity has been overbuilt. But
neither explanation would seem acceptable for a long run analysis. Ac-
cordingly, the traditional 20 percent excess reserve margin will be used
herein.
The foregoing considerations are brought into the calculation of plan-
ned supply in the following way. Planned megawatts of capacity, as given
in the source for Table 111-8-27, are multiplied by 8760, the number of
hours in a year. The result is multiplied by (1) the fraction not ex-
ported; (2) the load factor 0.67; and (3) the capacity factor 0.80. The
last allows for the 20 percent reserve margin.
A comparison of total demand and planned supply in Table III-B-27
shows that the latter significantly exceeds the former in all state-ORBES
subsectors except Illinois. This result would be changed but little if
the 1975 load factor of 61 percent were used instead of 67 percent. From
a benefit-cost standpoint, the implication is that costs exceed benefits
except in Illinois. This conclusion, however, is based on only the price-
based analysis and applies only to one of the two target years being con-
sidered, 1985.
4.2 QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS
Quantity—based projections are made to both 1985 and 2000. The same
planned supply is used for the former as in Table 111-8-27, and for the
same reason; i.e., capacity on the line by year 1985 is already coninitted.
On the other hand, supply planned for year 2000 is a policy variable to-
day. Alternative levels of planned supply, as developed for the purpose
of ORBES, will be used for comparison with the quantity-based projections
to 2000.
111—8—38
-------
4.2.1 1985 PROJECTIONS
Quantity-based projections to 1985 are shown in Table III-B-21 by
states and counties. These are based on quantity growth rates shown in
Table 111-8—16. ORBES county totals are summarized in Table 111-8-28.
Refer to Table tII-B—28. The comparison of demand and supply. leads
to the same conclusions as in Table 111-8—27; i.e., planned supply is
higher than demand is expected to be, on the basis of the same home con-
sumption ratios as existed in 1974 with the load factor of 67 percent and
a 20 percent reserve margin. Even if the load factor were reduced to 61
percent, as in 1975, there would be excess supply. The implication is
that benefits fall correspondingly short of costs with planned supply.
It is significant that the same conclusion is reached for both the
price-based and the quantity-based projections. The former were derived
from the CMI model and price growth rates. The latter were derived from
quantity growth. Each of the price and quantity growth rates were inde-
pendently inferred from a series of different economy-wide models.
Table III-B-28
QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS
ORBES COUNTIES BY STATE
1985
(MILLIONS OF MEGAWATT HOURS)
Demand
Supply,
P1 anned
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Totala
Illinois
9
4
11
24
29
Indiana
24
9
22
55
65
Kentucky
33
27
30
66
Th
Ohio
37
24
47
107
149
(a) Totals may differ slightly, due to rounding.
SOURCE: Demand is from Table III-B—21C, Appendices B, C, 0, and E.
Planned supply is from Table 111-8—27.
111—8—39
-------
4.2.2 2000 PROJECTIONS
Demand projections to the
Table 111-3-22, Appendix B, C,
OI ES counties within states In
ported. Because of the greater
the future, details by customer
year 2000 for electric power appear in
D, and E. These have been sumarized by
Table 111-3—29. Only total demand is re-
error in making projections so far into
class are omitted from Table 111-8—29.
Supply projections were made by the Energy Resources Center of the
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, based on the Bureau of Mines and
Technical Fix assumptions adopted in the ORBES study. The Energy
Resources Center projections were of installed capacity, corrected to year
2000 for retirements as well as additions, and distributed among the ORBES
states. Capacity projections were corrected to megawatt-hours using the
same home consumption factors, load factors, and reserve margins as in
Tables 111-8-27 and 111-8—28.
Comparing total demand with supply in Table 111-3-29, it
the IF projections come closer to our demand projections than
Moreover, the demand projections are relatively high compared
Table III-B—29
QUANTITY-BASED PROJECTIONS
ORBES COUNTIES BY STATE
2000
(MILLIONS OF MEGAWATT HOURS)
is clear that
do the BUM.
to what might
BOM
IF
Illinois
46
72
28
Indiana
109
176
68
Kentucky
Ohio
134
203
202
472
78
182
SOURCE: Demand is from Table III-8-22C. Supply is from
Energy Resources Center, University of Illinois
at Chicago Circle, Forecasts of Electric Power
and Energy Requirements for the ORBES States
and the ORBES Subregions Through the Year 2000,
( 1976), Tables 11-14 and 21-24, adjusted for
same export factors, load factors, and reserve
margin as used in Tables 111-3—27 and 111-8-28
of the present report.
Total
Demand
SUDD1V
III-B—40
-------
reasonably be achieved by load management in the year 2000. It will be
recalled that a load factor of 67 percent is used in Table 111-8-29. This
is the load factor projected by FEA for 1985. By the year 2000, a higher
load factor might very well be achieved.
A final observation goes back to a point noted early in this study;
the BOM forecasts were not derived from an economic model, but from inde-
pendent projection of past trends, qualified implicitly by the authors’
expectations about economic matters. Forecasting is far from a precise
science, but we know enough about it to rank as more promising the general
model approach than that used by BOM. At the same time, it is important
to note that the TV scenario assumed a particular policy orientation.
However sophisticated the Ford Foundation model, the TF projections also
rest on policy assumptions. It turns out that the growth rates we have
used, which were based on a survey of models, combined with the expecta-
tion that public policy would give some play to conservation as a goal,
come out relatively close to the Ford Foundation (TF) supply projections.
111-8-41
-------
REFERENCES
1. T. 0. Mount, L. 0. Chapman, 1. L. Tyrrell. “Electricity Demand in
the United States: An Econometric Analysis.” Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, 1973 (NSF/EP-49).
2. U.S. Federal Energy Administration, National Energy Outlook .
Washington, 1976.
3. U.S. Federal Energy Administration, A Report on Improving the Produc-
ti vi ty 0 f El ectri c Powerpi ants . Was hi rigton, 1975.
III—B-42
-------
APPENDIX A
PEAK LOAD PRICING MODEL
-------
APPENDIX A
PEAK LOAD PRICING MODEL
In general, elasticity of demand is defined as
- dQ/Q - d(btQ )
- dP7 -. d(e..nfl
Integration and rearrangement gives
(A-i)
say, two discrete hours,
On the assumption that
the other hour,
-Ti.. 24 -i,..
= A P •11 P 11 exp [ —(j — i) k] i,j = 1 24
j =2
(A-3)
where A is the number whose
ticity rr is negative when P
for “own” price elasticity.
two substitute comodities.
Q = APE’ , (A—2)
logarithm is the integration constant. Elas-
and Q both apply to the same convodity; i.e.,
It is positive when P and. Q apply to each of
The latter is, then, a cross elasticity.
Now, consider two different times of the day,
i and j, in which there is electric power demand.
demand in one hour is substitutable for demand in
= A P 1 11 P ’ 3
and
Q = A P JJPJl . (A—4)
The double subscripts indicate own and cross elasticities, respectively.
Negative signs have been added to distinguish the expected signs of the
own and cross elasticities. It can be shown that
T ljjfl,jj = Tl jfljj . (A—5)
Let i and j be numbered from 1 to 24 for the hours of the day, but
any hour may take on the value i = 1 and all hours before and after it are
numbered in ascending order. Consider the case in which all days are
alike. Then, numbering may cross the date line in either direction. We
hypothesize that own elasticities and cross—hour elasticities are related
by a decay constant, k:
= —n exp [ -(j — i) k] . (A—6)
In general, for each hour, 1:
(A- 7)
111-8-45
-------
Thus, there are 24 parameters n. 24 parameters A , and the parameter k
to be simultaneously estimated. The estimation process could be simpli-
fied by grouping together selected hours and by truncating the decay rela-
tionship such that only those cross elasticities having
exp(—(j — i) k] >
are considered. Since k is a parameter to be estimated, the last condi-
tion would require a trial and error process.
111-8-46
-------
APPENDIX B
I LLINOIS
Sources for Tables
No. Ill—B —
1 U.S. Federal Power Coninission, Typi.cal Electric Bills,
1 974.
3 Drysdale, Frank R., and Calef, Charles E., The Ener-
9etics of the United States of America: An Atlas ,
(Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1976). Residential,
comercial and industrial consumption was determined
with the help of use factors as given in Eqs. (1),
(2), and (3) in the text and related discussion.
4 Ibid .
5 U.S. Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book,
1972 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973).
17 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to prices in Table I ll-B—i. Prices are in 1974 dol-
1 ars.
18 Growth rates for 1975—2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to prices in Table I l l-B—i. Prices are in 1974 dol-
1 ars.
21 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table III-B—3.
22 Growth rates for 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
23 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-4.
24 Growth rates in 1975—2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table III-B—4.
111-8-47
-------
TABLE IA: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1914 IN ()RBES PLANT COUNtIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH $/15 0 0KWH C/KWH $/120,000K.WH C/KWH
2001 BROWN 9.35 3.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2002 CASS 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2003 CLARK 9.74 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2004 GREEN 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2005 HAMILTON 9.30 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2018 HANCOCK 9.15 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 4.9
2019 HENOERSO 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2006 IROQUOIS 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2007 JERSEY 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2008 LAWRENCE 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2020 LIVINGST 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2009 MARSHALL 8.84 3.5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2010 MERCER 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2011 PERRY 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266.
2012 PULASKI 9.35 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2013 S1.CLAIR 8.39 3.4 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2014 SCHUYLER 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2015 SCOTT 9.35 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2016 WA HINGT 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2017 WHITE 8.32 3.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
0,
to
-------
0 1
0
TABLE 18; ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/2 SOKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2021 CHAMPAIG 9.54 3.14 56.52 3•F 2120. 1.8
202 HENRY 8.77 3.5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1•
2023 MACON 8.87 3.5 77.61 5.2 2164.
2024 MADISON 8.23 3.3 62.39 4.2 2 66. 1.9
2025 MCLEAN 8.59 3.4 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2026 PEORIA 8.84 3.5 53.04 3.5 2.0
2027 ANGAMON 8.06 3.2 62.39 4.2 266.
2028 iAZEWELL 8.94 3.6 62.39 4.2 2266.
2029 W000FORD 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266.
-------
TAaLE id ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL. OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATF OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2030 ADAMS 9.76 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2031 ALEXANDE 6.25 2.5 62.39 6.2 2266. 1.9
2032 BOND 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2033 BUREAU 8.71 3.!5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2034 CALHOUN 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2035 CHRISTIA 10.13 4.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2036 CLAY 9.t8 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2037 CLINTON 8.56 3.4 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2038 COLES 10.65 4.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2039 CRAwFORD 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2040 CUMBERLA 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2041 DEWITT 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2042 DOUGLASS 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2043 EDGAR 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266.
2044 EDWARDS 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2045 EFFINGHA 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2261, 1.9
2046 FAYETTE 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2047 FORD 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1 .
2048 FRANKLIN 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266.
2049 FULTON 9.83 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2050 GALLATIN 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2051 GRUNDY 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2052 HARDIN 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2053 JACKSON 10.62 4.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2054 JASPER 9.50 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2055 JEFFERSO B.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2056 JOHNSON 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2057 KANKAKEE 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
05a KNOX 8.19 3.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
059 LASALLE 8.14 3.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2060 LOGAN 9.40 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2061 MARION 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2062 MCDONOUG 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2063 t4ACOIJPIN 8.1.2 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2064 MASON 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2065 MASSAC 8.50 3.4 62.39 4.2 2266, 1.9
2066 MENNARD 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2067 MONROE 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2068 MONTGOME 8.85 3.5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2069 MORGAN 8.12 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2070 MOULTRIE 0.05 3.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2071 P lAIT 8.12 3.2 62.39 2266, 1.9
2072 PIKE 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2073 POPE 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2074 PUTNAM 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 .2266. 1.9
2075 RANDOLPH 8.63 3.5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2076 RICHLAND 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2077 SALINE 9.22 3.7 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2078 SHELBY 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2079 STARK 9.39 3.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
-------
TABLE ICs ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDFNIIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C/KWH
2080 UNION 10.33 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
208) VERMILLI 8.85 3.5 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
208 WABASH 1049 4.) 6 .39 4.2 2266.
2 8 WARREN 8.j2 3. 6 .39 4.2 2266.
2v84 WAYNE 9.i6 3. 62.39 4.2 2266.
2085 WILLIAMS 10.52 4.2 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2086 BOONE 19.39 7.8 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
-------
u - I
( 1
TABLE 10* ELECTRICItY PRICES POR YEAR W* III ALL 3TI-R JP41I S
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/250KWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C/KWH
2007 CARROLL 10.15 4.1 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2088 COOK 9.93 4.0 79.34 5.3 2 4 6 Q• 2.1
2089 DEKALS 9.95 4.0 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2090 DUPAGE 9.51 3.8 77.61 5.2 2426. 2.0
2091 LODAVIES 10.69 4.3 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2092 KANE 9.68 3.9 77.61 5.2 2426. 2.0
2093 K84DALL 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1’
2094 LAKE 9.80 3.9 77.61 5.2 2266.
2095 MCHENRY 9.86 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2096 OG&.E 9.49 3.8 62.39 6.2 2266, 1.9
2091 ROCKTSLA 8.99 3.6 53.14 3.5 2201. 1.8
2098 LEE 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2099 STEPHENS 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2100 WHITESID 9.68 3.9 62.39 4.2 2266. 1.9
2101 WINNEBAG 8.80 3.5 62.39 4.2 2411. 2.0
2102 WILL 9.68 3.9 77.61 5.2 2426. 2.0
-------
TABLE 3M ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH
2001 BROWN 6. 0. 20. 26. C.
200 CASS 16. 3. 44. 63. 0.
2003 CLARK 0. 52. 67. 0.
2004 GREEN i8. 2. 58. 78. 0.
2005 HAMILTON 8. 1. 19. 29. 0.
2018 HANCOCK ?8. 1. 77. 106, 0.
2019 HENDER O 10. 0. 31. 41. 0.
20u6 IRO9UOIS 40. 12. 119. 171. 0.
2007 JERSEY 22. 1. 41. 64. 0.
2008 LAWRENC 21. 0. 36. 57. 0.
2020 LIVINGSI 56. 3. 141. 199. 0.
2009 MAR HALL j. 7. 42. 66. 0.
2010 MERL.ER u. 0. 64. 85. 0.
2011 PERRY 21. 11. 37. 69. 0.
2012 PULASKI 7. 1. 12. 20. 0.
2913 ST.CLAIR 357. 152. 386. 895. 0.
2ui4 CHUYLER 10. 0. 28. 38. 0.
20t5 SCOTT 7. 0. 21. 28. lB.
2016 WASHINGT 17. 1. 36. 55. 0.
2017 WHITE 20. 3. 50. 72. C.
SUBTOTAL 717. 198. 1314. 2229. 18.
-------
TABLE aUz ELECTRiCITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR i 7’. IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COt*ITIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
l,000MWH 1,000MWH l,000MWH 1, 000MWH 1,0 00MWH
2021 CHAMPAIG 250. 37. 336. 623. 309.
2022 HENRY 71. 20. 171. 262. 0.
2023 MACON 15?. 178. 217. 552. 0.
2024 MADISON 295. 312. 329. 936. 6010.
2025 MCLEAN 128. 106. 229. 663. 0
2026 PEORIA 280. 179. 428. 887. 2429.
2027 SANGANON 246. 91. 3! 8. 695. 488.
2028 TAZEWELL 139. 190. 155. 484. 3089.
2029 W000FORO 39. 5. 88. 132. 0.
SUBTOTAL 1606. 1118. 2310. 5034. 12325.
-------
TABLE 3Cs ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STAlE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
l,000MWH 1,000NWH 1,00 0MWH I,00 0MWH 1,000MWH
2030 ADAMS 17. 76. 144. 298. 0.
2031 ALEXANDE 10. 5. 26. 41. 0.
2032 BOND 15. 7. 31. 53. 0.
2033 BUREAU 49. 17. 116. 182. 0.
2034 CALHOUN 6. 0. 15. 21. 0.
2035 CHRISTIA 42. 12. 112. 165. 6183.
2036 CLAY 17. 4. 34. 55. 0.
2037 CLINTON 30. 10. 59. 99. 0.
2038 COLES 56. 32. 115. 203. 0.
2039 CRAWFORD 22. 24. 36. 82. 1041.
2040 CUNBERLA ii. 1. 27. •40. 0.
2041 DEWITT 23. 10. 52. 85. 0.
2042 DOUGLASS 21. 24. 42. 87. C.
2043 EDGAR 25. 11. 62. 99. 0.
2044 EDWARDS 3. 17. 7. 27. o.
2045 EFFINGHA 26. 8. 73. 107. 0.
2046 FAYETTE 22. 6. 52. 78. 0.
2047 FORD 21. 6. 64. 91. 0.
2048 FRANKLIN 41. 4. 65. 111. 0.
2049 HiLTON 43. 36. 86. 165. 0.
2050 GALLATIN 7. 2. 19. 28.
i 2051 GRUNOY 39. 14. 55. 108. 993c.
2052 HARDIN 5. 0. 10. 15. 0.
°‘ 2053 JACKSON 66. 12. 93. 171. 1026.
2054 JASPER 13. 1. 37. 51. 0.
2055 JEFFERSO 36. 9. 66. 112. 0.
2056 JOHNSON 8. 0. 15. 23. 0.
2057 KANKAKEE 109. 110. 205. 424. 0.
2058 KNOX 79. 55. 143. 276. 0.
2059 LASALLE 129. 119. 250. 498. 0.
2060 LOGAN 37. 33. 82. 152. 0.
2061 MARION 45. 14. 84. 143. 0.
2062 MCDONOUG 41. 14. 98. 153. 0.
2063 MACOUPIN 53. 5. 112. 170. 0.
2064 MASON 23. 3. 54. 79. 1103.
2065 MASSAC 14. 7. 23. 44. 7025.
2066 MENNARD 1. 44. 4. 49. 0.
2067 MONROE 25. 1. 42. 68. 0,
2068 MONTGOME 34. 8. 89. 131. 552.
2069 MORGAN 43. 29. 96. 167. 1435.
2070 MOULTRIE 16. 6. 37. 59. 0.
2071 PlAiT 17. 33. 25. 75. 0.
2072 PIKE 21. 3. 76. 100. 313.
2073 POPE 4. 0. 6. 10. 0.
2074 PUTNAM 6. 3. 13. .22. 1776.
2075 RANDOLPH 35. 17. 61. 113. 1747.
2076 RICHIAND 4. 55. 9. 67. 0.
2077 SALINE 29. 2. 68. 99. 0.
2018 SHELBY 26. 3. 66. 95. 0.
2079 STARK 9. 2. 29. 40. 0.
-------
01
—a
TABLE 3Gx çLE TRXC{TYCONSyMPJ1 8 NPOR YEAR 19 ’. IN .LI.. r1T1IEK DI EfS COt)T1V E
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH l,00 0MWH 1,0O0MW -1 1,000MWH
2080 UNION 18. 5. 28. 52. 0.
2081 VERMILLI 119. 99. 184. 402. 1017.
2082 WABASH 15. 10. 26. 5 !. 0.
2083 WARREN 25. 8. 80. 113. 0.
2084 WAYNE 11. 27. 23. 61. 0.
2085 WILLIAMS 46. 18. 87. j51. 1488.
2086 BOONE 27. 58. 42. i27. 0.
SUBTOTAl.. 1795. 1138. 3656. 6588. 34649.
ORBES—TOTAL 41!?. 2454. 7280. 13851. 46992.
-------
TABLE 3D: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTiES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH l,000MWH 1, 000MWH 1, 00 0MWH ), 000MWH
2087 CARROLL 24. 3. 73. 100. 0.
2088 COOK 8483. 6094. 9431. 24009. 11*26.
2089 DEKALB 91. 61. 160. 312. 0.
2090 DUPAGE 1017. 191. 939. 2147. o.
091 LODAVIES 26. 2. 61. 89. 0.
2092 KANE 443. 101. 578. 1122. 0.
2093 KENDALL 45. 0. 64. 109. 0.
2094 LAKE 823. 108. 742. 1673. 5084.
?095 MCHENRY 166. 114. 200. 480. 0.
2096 OGLE 53. 37. 116. 206. 0.
2097 ROCKTSLA 224. 226. 263. 712. 10397.
2098 LEE 43. 20. 96. 160. 790.
2099 STEPHENS 56. 59. 111. 227. 0.
2100 WHI1ESID 162. 41. 85. 287. 0.
2101 WINNEBAG 348. 363. 345. 1056, 1448.
2102 WILL 319. 222. 406. 947. 14175.
SUBTOTAL 12323. 7644. 13669. 33636. 43020.
STATE-TOTAL 16439. 10099. 20949. 47487. 90012.
-------
TAaL Y xa Y ”
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2001 BROWN 117. 2. 321. 440.
2002 CASS 3 ,59. 44, 764. 1166.
2003 CLARK 330. 0. 859. 1189.
2004 GREEN 387. 34. 974. 1395.
2005 HAMILTON 185. 20. 330. 536.
2018 HANCOCK 603. 7. 1301. 1911.
2019 HENDERSO 200. 0. 511. 711.
2006 IROQUOIS 917. 164. 2112. 3193.
2007 JERSEY 462. 12. 689. 1163.
2008 LAWRENCE 443. 0. 588. l031.
2020 LIVINGST 1280. 37. 2529. 3846.
2009 MARSHALL 401. 109. 790. 1300.
2010 HERCER 423. 6. 1050. 147g.
2011 PERRY 547. 178. 749. 1474.
2012 PULASKI 159. 15. 215. 389.
2013 ST.CLAIR 9438. 2526. 7986. 19950.
2014 CHUYLER 209. 0. 457. 666.
2015 SCOTT 144. 5. 346. 495.
2016 WASHINGT 379. 19. 619. 1017.
2017 WHITE 432. 36. 855. 1323.
SUBTOTAL 11414. 3214. 24046. 44674.
-------
0
TABLE 48: NAIURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2021 CHAMPAIG 5731. 533. 6013. 12277.
2022 HENRY 1643. 288. 3099. 5030.
2023 MACON 5130. 3671. 5574. 14375.
20?4 MADISON 14271. 9495. 12653. 36210.
20z5 MCLEAN 3 48. 1101. 4544. 9493.
2026 PEORIA 7r35. 3104. 9242. 20081.
2027 SANGAMON 6166. 1433. 7025. i4624.
2028 TAZEWELL 6057. 5223. 5275. 16556.
2029 W000FORD 869. 77. 1549. 2495.
SUBTOTAL 50850. 25525. 54774. 131149.
-------
TABLE 4C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL tiTHER ORBES CUUNlLt
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNtY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUS1R ML
2030 ADAMS 2300. 1433. 3372. 7106.
2031 ALEXANDE 250. 79 493. 822.
2032 BOND 386. 115. 605. 1106.
2033 BUREAU 1147. 253. 2156. 3556.
2034 CALHOUN 128. 1. 249. 377.
2035 CHRISTIA 975. 175. 2052. 3202.
2036 CLAY 393. 65. 623. 1081.
2037 CLINTON 719. 146. 1112. 1977.
2038 VOLES 1455. 515. 2336. 4307.
2039 CRAWFORD 689. 462. 883. 2035.
2040 CUMBERLA 129. tO. 239. 379.
2041 DEWITT 559. 159. 994. 1713.
2042 DOUGLASS 653. 473. 1011. 2157.
2043 EDGAR 613. 174. 1189. 1976.
2044 EDWARDS 0. 0. 0. 0.
2045 EFFINGHA 599. 118. 1319. 2036.
2046 FAYETTE 497. 63. 913. 1414.
2047 FORD 475. 83. 1140. 1698.
2048 FRANKLIN 930. 61. 1148. 2138.
2049 FULTON 949. 507. 1501. 2957.
2050 GALLATIN 163. 33. 345. 541,
2051 GRUNDY 978. 223. 1082. 2286.
2052 HARDIN 101. 0. 166. 267.
a 2053 JACKSON 1433. 164. 1596. 3193.
2054 JASPER 268. 14. 617. 899.
2055 JEFFERSO 857. 138. 1219. 2214.
2056 JOHNSON 169. 0. 242. 411.
2057 KANKAKEE 3258. 2081. 4821. 10160.
2058 KNOX 2158. 947. 3061. 6166.
2059 LASALLE 3162. 2116. 5669. 11621.
2060 LOGAN 1044. 582. 1805. 3431.
2061 MARION 1080. 208. 1566. 2855.
2062 MCDONOUG 967. 206. 1809. 2982.
2063 MACOUPIN 1148. 71. 1912. 3131.
2064 MASON 493. 35. 915. 1442.
2065 MASSAC 367. 107. 463. 936.
2066 MENNARD 33. 736. 75. 844.
2067 MONROE 534. 7. 103. 1244.
2068 MONTGOME 769. 121. 1572. 2462.
2069 MORGAN 1126. 480. 1986. 3592.
2070 NOULTRIE 369. 84. 692. 1165.
2071 PIATI 389. 487. 452. 1327.
207z PIKE 450. 42. 1269. 1760.
2013 POPE 76. 0. 101. 177.
20i4 PUTNAM 2717. 786. 4928. 8431.
2075 RANDOLPH 903. 269. 1216. 2388.
2076 RICHLAND *07. 1040. 209. 1356.
2077 SALINE 623. 27. 1143. *793.
2078 SHELBY 561. 47. 1123. 1731.
2079 STARK 203. 23. 495. 721.
-------
o I
TABLE ‘ IC : NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER OR ES COUNTIES
TN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2080 UNiON 441. 83. 530. 1053.
2081 VERMILLI 3490. 1843. 4232. 9565.
2082 WABAIH 397, 558. 1121.
2083 WARREN 592. 119. 1480. 2191.
2084 WAYNE 259. 396. 432. 1087.
2085 WILLIAMS 1189. 291. 1159. 3239,
2086 BOONE 1101. 1486. 132e. 3915.
SUBTOTAL 48442. 20412. 76924. 145778.
ORBES—TOTAL 116703. 49152. 155742. 321601.
-------
TA3LE 4D: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN LL lWltK %..UUr ira
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF STUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
2087 CARROLL 526. 43. 1227. 1796.
2088 COOK 269732. 122032. 234827. 626641.
2089 DEKAIB 2486. 1055. 3433. 6974.
2090 DUPAGE 24261. 2874. 17532. 44661.
2091 LODAVIES 570. 28. 1058. 1656.
2092 KANE 12537. 1805. 1 82O. 27162.
2093 KENDALL 963. 0. 1054. 2017.
2094 LAKE 27653. 2289. 19539. 49482.
2095 MCHENRY 4803. 2083. 4529. l 4j5.
2096 OGLE 1408. 625. 2426. ‘.4a0.
2097 ROCKTSLA 9023. 5737. 8297. 23057.
2098 LEE 1703. 507. 2971. 5181.
2099 STEPHENS 1694. 1119. 2613. 5426.
2100 WHITESID 4306. 681. 1762. 6749.
2101 WINNEBAG 14735. 9701. 11433. 35869.
2102 WILL 18698. 8213. 18659. 45570.
SWIOTAL 395099. 158842. 344180. 898122.
STATE—TOTAL 511802. 207994. 499922. 1219723.
CA)
-------
TABLE 5*: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIA8L FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOI
COUNTY NAME PER APITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
IN iOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2001 BROWN 2241. 5586. 13. 10. 0. 9. 5.
2002 CASS 2547. 142)9. 36. 19. 6. 24. 42.
2003 CLARK 2698. 1621b. 44. 39. 0. 25. 14.
2004 GREEN 2370. 17014. 40. 34. 4, 23. 20.
2005 HAMILTON 2111. 8665. 18. 8 , 3. 10. 7.
2018 HANCOCK 2564. 23645. 61. 38. 1. 35. 43.
2019 HENDERSO 2534. 8451. 21. 19. 0. 11. 16.
2006 IROQUOIS 2762. 33532. 93. 62. 21. 57. 80.
2007 JERSEY 2453. 18492. 45. 15. 2. 23. 10.
2008 LAWRENCE 2457. 17522. 43. 9. 0. 22. 22.
2020 LIVINGST 2908. 40690. 118. 59. 4. 72. 65.
2009 MARSHALL 2914. 13302. 39. 21. 13. 22. 31.
2010 MERCER 2508. 17294. 45. 35. 1. 27. 20.
2011 PERRY 2500. 19751. 49. 10. 20. 28. 801.
2012 PULASKI 1730. 8741. 15. 4. 2. 7. 805.
2013 ST.CLAIR 2818. 285176. 804. 22. 267. 357. 519.
2014 SCHUVIER 2679. 8135. 22. 16. 0. 10. 519.
2015 SCOTT 2479. 6096. 15. 11. 1. 9. 516.
2016 WASHINGT 2720. 13780. 37. 18. 2. 16. 516.
2017 WHITE 2520. 17312. 46. 13. 5. 35. 531.
SUBTOTAL 593625. 1602. 462. 350. 823. 4587..
-------
fC0M)M1C VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 tN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN tHE STATE OF ILLiNOIS
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PFRSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESIIE
INCOME iNCOME SHiPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SPIES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MiLLiONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2021 CIIAMPAIG 3214. 163281. 525. 50. 61. 251. 330.
2022 HENRY 3021. 53217. 161. 76. 35. 93. 58.
2023 MACON 3350. 125010. 419. 29. 372. 225. 267.
2024 MADISON 3110. 250934. 780. 24. 645. 356. 230,
2025 MCLEAN 3188. 104389. 333. 73. 217. 1R6. 256.
2026 PEORIA 3452. 19531e. 674. 25. 336. 424. 807.
2021 SANGAMON 3424. 161335. 552. 48. 160. 303. 380.
2028 TAZEWELL 3302. 118649. 392. 33. 420. 151. 312.
2029 W000FORD 3032. 28012. 85. 33. 9. 51. 38.
SUBTOTAL 1200145. 3921. 392. 2255. 2052. 2618.
-------
TABLE 5C: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER OR8ES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2030 ADAMS 2812. 70861. 199. 36. 154. 121. 12(.
2031 ALEXANDE 1998. 12015. 24. 3. 9. 23. 30.
2032 BOND 2556. 14012. 36. 13. 13. 18. 14.
2033 BUREaU 2888. 38541. 111. 57. 31. 59. 56.
2034 CALHOUN 2307. 5675. 13. 7. 0. 7. 8.
2035 CHRISTIA 2629. 35948. 95. 34• 21. 72. 55.
2036 CLAY 2552. 14735. 38. 11. 8. 22. 15.
203? CLINTON 2401. 28315. 68. 21. 1?. 37. 44.
2038 COLES 2804. 47815. 134. 24. sq. . 44.
2039 CRAWFORD 2928. 19824. 58. 13. 48. 28. li.
2040 CUMBERIA 2578. 9772. 25. 13. 3. 13. ii.
2041 DEWITT 3127. 16975. 53. 20. 19. 33. 35.
2042 D JGLASS 2957. 18997. 56. 24. 51. 24. 33.
2043 EDGAR 2734. 21591. 59. 31. 2!, 33. 46.
2044 EDWARDS 2475. 7090. 18. tO. 76. 7. 20.
2045 EFFINGHA 2442. 24608. 60. 19. 15. 55. 41.
2046 FAYETTE 2396. 20272. 49. 1?. 8. 33. 28.
2047 FORD 2946. 16382. 48. 26. ii. 38. 52.
2048 FRANKLIN 2350. 38329. 90. 7. 7. 55. i S,
2049 FULTON 2727. 41890. 114. 33. 76. 68. 21.
‘ 2050 ( ALLATIN 2177. 7418. 16. 10. 4. 9. 12.
0 2051 GRUNOY 3292. 26535. 87. 16. 25. 38. 52.
2052 HARDIN 2055. 4914. 10. . 0. 8. 1..
2053 JACKSON 2537. 55008. 140. 1 • 20. 77. 21.
2054 JASPER 2592. 10741. 28. 18. 2. 18. 26.
2055 JEFFERSO 2565. 31466. 81. 11. 16. 53. 31.
2056 JOHNSON 2197. 7550. 17. 4. 0. 9. 273.
2057 KANKAKEE 2900. 97250. 282. 34. 224. 199. 124.
2058 KNOX 3123. 61280. 191. 40. 104. 111. 85.
2059 LASALLE 2961. 111409. 330. 64. 237. 214. 163.
2060 LOGAN 2800. 33538. 94. 34. 65. 51. 36.
2061 MARION 2619. 38396. 101. 14. 24. 68. 52.
2062 MCDONOUG 2563. 36653. 94. 32. 25. 66. 57.
2063 MACOUPIN 2548. 44557. 114. 42. 9. 63. 42.
2064 MASON 3056. 16161. 49. 21. 4. 30. 60.
2065 MASSAC 2374. 13889. 33. 5. 12. 18. 12.
2066 MENNARD 2781. 9685. 27. 18. 751. 16. 24.
2067 MONROE 2741. 18831. 52. 14. 1. 24. 13.
2068 MONTGOME 2532. 30260. 77. 31. 15. 56. 45.
2069 MORGAN 2870. 36174. 104. 31. 55. 11. 61.
2070 MOULTRIE 2824. 13263. 37. 16. 10. 2.1. 24.
2071 PlAiT 3141. 15509. 49. 10. 76. 22. 24.
2072 PIKE 2481. 19185. 48. 42. 6. 33. 27.
2073 POPE 1908. 3851. 7. 3. 0. 3. 1.
2074 PUTNAM 2777. 500?. 14. 9. 5. 5. 16.
2075 RANDOLPH 2609. 31379. 82. 16. 30. 46. 14.
2076 RICHLAND 2364. 16829. 40. 11. 482. 32. 21.
2017 SALINE 2437. 25721. 63. 7. 3. 58. 41.
2078 SHELBY 2507. 22589. 57. 32. 6. 32. 29.
2019 STARK 2798. 7510. 21. 18. 3. 10. 11.
-------
TABLE 5C OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER QRBES COUNTI
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COtJN1Y NAME PEI4CAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE Uii i .
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2080 UNION 2502. 16071. 40. 7. 9. 20. 312.
2081 VERMILLI 3072. 97041. 298. 41. 196. 160. 136.
2082 WAbASH 2154. 12841. 35. 8. 18. 19, 16.
2083 WARREN 2691. 21595. 58. 41. 1 . 40. 49.
2084 WAYNE 2408. 17004. 1 . 1 . 78. 23. 35,
2085 WILLIAMS 2558. 49021. 12 . 5. 38. 68. 400.
2086 BOONE 3340. 25440. 85. 17. 142. 40. 113.
SUBTOTAL 1595230. 4373. 1206. 3356. 2683. 3165.
ORBES—TOTAL 3389000. 9896. 2060. 5961. 5558, 10430.
-------
TABLE so: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN LL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME P RCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VAL F DO D RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUrACIURtNG SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MiLLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS, (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2081 CARROLL 2819. 19276. 54. 41. 6. 30. II ?.
2088 COOK 3771. 548832t . 20696. 17. 11640. 10028. 30650.
2089 DEKALB 30?’ . 7167,. 221. 58. 116. 112. 103.
2090 DUPAGE 4258. 491882. 2094. 12. 308. 8 2. 1394.
2091 LODAVIES 2566. 21166. 56. 29. 3. 29. 14.
2092 KANE 3585. 25100 5. 900. 40. 161. 473. 274.
2093 KENDALL 3453. 26374. 91. 28. 0. 28. 12.
2094 LAKE 4179. 382638. 1599. 12. 164. 618. 252.
2095 MCHENRY 3602. 11155f. 402. 40. 2 7. 172. 6 !.
2096 OGLE 3010. 42867. 129. 61. . 63, 5 1.
2097 ROCKTSLA 3661. 166736. 610. 2u. 48g. 293. 389.
2098 LEE 2666. 37941. 101. 44. 37. 34
2099 STEPHENS 3011. 48861. 147. 45. 121.. 81. 43.
2100 WHITESID 2917. 249498. 728. 58. 143. 108. 61.
2101 WINNEBAG 3420. 246623. 843. 23. 690. 342. 218.
2102 WILL 3387. 249948. 847. 34. 462. 437. 400.
SUBTOIAL 7906976. 29519. 561. 14623. 13700. 33814.
STATE—TOTAL 11295976. 39415. 2621. 20584. 19258. 44304.
-------
TABLE 17A ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLANI Luuv e.ir
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
$/25 OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2001 BROWN 9.96 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2002 CASS 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2003 CLARK 10.37 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2004 GREEN 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2005 HAMJLTON 9.90 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
20J8 HANI.OCK 9. 4 3.9 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
20i9 HENDERSO 10 1 u0 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2006 IROQUOIS 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2007 JERSEY li.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2,7
2008 LAWRENCE 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.6 3222. 2.
2020 LIVINGST 10.31 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.
2009 MARSHAlL 9.41 3.8 66.45 4.4 3222. 2,?
2010 MERCER 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2011 PERRY 8.65 3.5 66.65 4.4 3222, 2,7
2012 PULASKI 9.96 4.0 66.45 4.4 32’?. 2.7
2013 ST.CLAIR 8.94 3.6 66.45 6.4 3222. 2.1
2014 SCHUYLER 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.7
2015 SCOTT 9.96 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2016 WASHINGT 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2017 WHITE 8.86 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222, 2,7
-------
TABLE 178: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OXWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2021 CHAMPAIG 10.16 4.1 60.19 4.0 3015. 2.5
2022 HENRY 9.34 3.7 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2023 MACON 9.45 3.E 82.65 5.5 304q. 2.5
2024 MADISON 8.76 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2025 MCLEAN 9.15 3.7 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2026 PEORIA 9.41 3.8 56.49 3.8 3474. 2.9
2027 SANGAMON 8.58 3.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2028 TAZEWELL 9.52 3.8 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2029 WOODFORD 10.00 4.0 66.45 4 ,4 3222. 2.7
-------
TABLE l7C ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER OR8ES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2030 ADAMS 10.39 4.2 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2031 ALEXANDE 6.66 2.7 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2032 BOND 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2033 BUREAU 9.28 3.7 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2034 CALHOUN 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2035 CP ISTIA 11.43 4.6 66.45 4,4 3222. 2.?
2036 CLAY 9.88 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2031 CLINTON 9.12 3.6 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2038 COLES 11.34 4.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2039 CRAWFORD t l.OO 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2040 CUMBERLA 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2041 DEWITT 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2042 DOUGLASS 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222 2.
2043 EDGAR 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.
2044 EDWARDS 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2045 EFFIPIGHA 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.7
2046 FAYETTE 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.?
2047 FORD 11.00 4.4 66.65 4.4 3222. 2,7
— 2048 FRANKLIN 11.00 4.4 66.45 6.4 3222. 2.7
049 FULTDN 10.47 4.2 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
t050 GALLATIN 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
° 2051 GRUNDY 10.31 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2052 HARDIN iO.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.7
2053 JACKSON 11.31 4.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2054 JASPER 10.12 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2055 JEFFERSO 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.7
2056 JOHNSON 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2057 KANKAKEE 10.31 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2058 KNOX 8.72 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2059 LASALLE 8.67 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2060 LOGAN 10.01 4.0 66.65 4.4 3222. 2.7
2061 MARION 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2062 MCOONOUG 11.00 4.4 66.45 6.4 3222. 2.7
2063 MACOtJPIN 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 •3222. 2.
2064 MASON 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.
2065 P4ASSAC 9.05 3.6 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2066 MENNARD 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.1
2067 MONROE 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.?
2068 MONTGOME 9.43 3.8 66.45 4.4 3222, 2,7
2069 MORGAN 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2070 MOULTRIE 8.57 3.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.?
2071 PIAT1 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222 . 2.7
2072 PIKE 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2073 POPE 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2074 PUTNAM 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 .3222. 2.7
2075 RANDOLPH 9.19 3.7 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2076 RICHLAND 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2071 SALINE 9.82 3.9 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2078 SHELBY 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2079 STARK 10.00 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222.. 2.1
-------
TABLE tiC: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 19fl5 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRiAL.
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/I20,000KWH C/1(WH
2080 UNION 11.00 4.4 66.45 4.6 3222. 2.7
2081 VERMILLI 9.43 3.R 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2082 WABASH 10.96 4.4 66.45 ‘,.4 3222. 2.
2083 WARREN 8.65 3.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.
2084 WAYNE 10.39 4.2 66.45 44 3222. 2.7
2085 WILLIAMS 11.20 4.5 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2086 BOONE 20.65 8.3 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
-------
I —,
—1
TA8LE 17D* ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 198 I *ts &, vi s
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL.
S/Z5OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2087 CARROLL 10.81 4.3 66.45 4,4 3222. 2.7
2088 COOK 10.58 4.2 84.50 5.6 3511. 2.9
2089 DEKA B 10.60 4.2 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2090 DUPAbE 10.13 4.1 82.65 5.5 3450. 2.9
2091 LODAVIES 11.38 4.6 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2092 KANE 10.31 4.1 82.65 5.5 3450. 2.9
2093 KENDALL i0.3i 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2094 LAKE 10.44 4.2 82.65 5.5 3222. 2.?
2095 MCHENRY 10.50 4.2 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.?
2096 OGLE 10.11 4.0 66.45 4.4 3222, 2.?
2097 ROCKTSLA 9.5? 3.8 56.59 3.8 3130. 2.6
2098 LEE 10.31 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.7
2099 STEPHENS 10.31 4.1. 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.1
2100 WHITESID 10.31 4.1 66.45 4.4 3222. 2.?
2101 WINNEBAG 9.37 3.7 66.45 4.4 3428. 2.9
2102 WILL 10.31 4.1 82.65 5.5 3450, 2,9
-------
TABLE IB M ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN OR6ES PLANT COUN1IES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KWH C/KWH
2001 BROWN 8.21 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2002 CASS 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2003 CLARK 8.55 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2004 GREEN 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2005 HAMILTON 8.11 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3 .3
2018 HANCOCK 8.03 3.2 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2019 HENDERSO 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2006 IROQUOIS 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4010. 3.3
2007 JERSEY 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3 ,3
2008 LAWRENCE 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2020 LIVINGST 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2009 MARSHALL 7.76 3.1 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2010 MERCER 1.13 2.9 54.18 3.1 4018. 3.3
2011 PERRY 1.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2012 PULASKI 8.21 3.3 54.78 3.7 6018. 3.3
2013 ST.CLAIR 7.37 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2014 SCHUYLER 9.01 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2015 SCOTT 8.21 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2016 WASHINGPT 7.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3,3
2017 WHITE 7.30 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
-------
T*8L lab; ELECTRiCITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IPI 0T 1ER DR S SPISA G0 JNT1 S
IN ThE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COII4TY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRJAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2021 CHAMPAIG 8,38 3.4 49.62 3.3 3759. 3. 1
2022 HENRY 7.70 3.1 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2023 MACON 1.79 3.1 68.14 4.5 3801. 3.2
2024 MADISON 7.23 2.9 54.78 3 7 4018. 3.3
2025 MCLEAN 7.54 3.0 54.78 3.? 40 18. 3.3
2026 PEORIA 1.76 3.1 46.57 3.1 4331. 3.6
2027 SANGAHON 7.08 2.8 54.78 3.7 4018.
2028 TAZEWELL 7.85 3.1 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2029 W000FORD 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
-------
TABLE 18C: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C/KWH
2030 ADAMS 8.51 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2031 ALEXANDE 5.49 2.2 54.78 3.7 40t8. 3.3
2032 BOND 7.13 2.9 54.78 3.? 4018. 3.3
2033 BUREAU 7.65 3.1 54.78 3.7 4 0i8. 3.3
2034 CALHOUN 0.24 3.3 54.18 3.7 4010. 3.3
2035 CHRISTIA 9.42 3.8 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2036 CLAY 8.15 3.3 54.78 3.7 40i8. 3.3
2037 CLINTON 7. 2 3.0 54.78 3.7 4018. 3 ,3
2038 COLES 9.35 3.? 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2039 CRAWFORD 9.01 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3,3
2040 CUP4BERLA 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2041 DEWITT 7.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 40i8, 3.3
2042 DOUGLASS 8.24 3.3 54.18 3.? 4018. 3.3
2043 EDGAR 9.07 3.6 54.18 3.7 4018. 3.3
2044 EDWARDS 8.24 3.3 54.,8 3.7 4018. 3.3
2045 EFFIMGHA 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 6018. 3.3
2046 FAYETTE 8.2 3.3 54. 18 4018. 3.3
2047 FORD 9.0, 3.6 54.r8 3., 4018. 3.3
2048 FRANKLIN 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 40i8. 3.3
2049 FULTO!j 8.63 3.5 3.7 4018. 3.3
2050 GAIIAiIN 8.24 3.3 54.,8 3.? 40i8. 3.3
,, 2051 GRUNDY 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
‘ 2052 HARDIN 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2053 JACKSON 9.32 3.7 54.78 3.1 4018. 3.3
2054 JASPER 8.34 3.3 54.18 3.7 4018. 3.3
2055 JEFFERSO 7.13 2.9 54.18 3.7 4018. 33
2056 JOHNSON 8.24 3.3 54.18 3.7 4018. 3.3
2057 KANKAKEE 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2058 KNOX 7.19 2.9 54.jB 3.7 4013. 3.3
2059 LASALLE 7.15 2.9 54.8 3.7 4018. 3.3
2060 LOGAN 8.25 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2061 MARION 7.13 2.9 54.18 3.7 4018. 3.3
2062 MCDONOUG 9.07 3.6 54.r8 3.? 4018. 3.3
2063 MACOUPIN 7•I 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2064 MA ON 9.u l 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2065 MA SAC 7.46 3.0 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2066 MENNARD 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.1 4018. 3.3
2067 MONROE 1.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3,3
2068 MONTGOME 7.17 3.1 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2069 MORGAN 7.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2010 MOULTR1E 1.07 2.8 54.78 3.1 4018. 3.3
2071 P 1 ATT 1.13 2.9 54.18 3.7 4018.. 3.3
2012 PiKE 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 40i8. 3.3
2073 POPE 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2014 PUTNAM 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2015 RANDOLPH 7.58 3.0 54.76 3.7 4018. 3.3
2076 RICHIAND 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4010. 3.3
2077 SALINE 8.10 3.2 54.18 3.7 4018. 3.3
2078 SHELBY 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2019 STARK 8.24 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
-------
TABLE JBC: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR Z000 II ALL OF I R QRBES COIJNV1 S
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIOENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
2080 UNION 9.07 3.6 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2081 VERMILLI 7.77 3.1 54.78 37 4018. 3.3
2082 WABASH 9.03 3.6 54.78 3.? 4018. 3.3
2083 WARREN 7.13 2.9 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2084 WAYNE 8.57 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2085 WILLIAMS 9.24 3.7 54.78 I7 4018. 3.3
2086 BOONE 17.02 6.8 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
-------
TABLE 18Dt ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
s/250KWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KWH C/KWH
2081 CARROLL 8.91 3.6 54.78 3•7 4018. 3.3
2088 COOK 8.72 3.5 69.66 4.6 4378. 3.6
2089 DEKALB 8.74 3.5 54.78 3•7 6018. 3,3
2090 DUPAGE 8.35 3.3 68.14 4.5 4301. 3.6
2091 LODAVIES 9.39 3.8 54.78 3.7 401R. 3.3
2092 KANE 8.50 3.4 68.14 4.5 4301. 3.6
2093 KENDALL 8.50 3.4 54.18 3,7 4018. 3,3
2094 LAKE 8.60 3.4 68.14 4.5 4018. 3 3
2095 NCHENRY 8.66 3.5 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2096 OGLE 8.33 3.3 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2097 ROCKTSLA 7.89 3.2 46.66 3.1 3902. 3.3
2098 LEE 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2099 STEPHENS 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2100 WHITESID 8.50 3.4 54.78 3.7 4018. 3.3
2101 WTNNEBAG 7.73 3.1 54.78 3.7 4275. 3.6
2102 WILL 8.50 3.4 68.14 4.5 4301. 3.6
-------
TABLE 21A: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR *985 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTiES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,00 0MWH 1,000MWH 1, 000NWH l, 000MWH
2001 BROWN 13. 0. 31. 43.
2002 CASS 36. 5. 67. 107.
2003 CLARK 34. 0. 78. 113.
2004 GREEN 40. 4. 88. 31.
2005 HAMILTON 19. 2. 29. 50.
2018 HANCOCK 62. 1. 118. 101.
2019 HENDERSO 21. 0. 48. 69.
2006 IROQUOIS 89. 18. 181. 289.
2007 JERSEY 48. 1. 63. 112.
2008 LAWRENCE 41. 0. 55. 101,
2020 LIVINGST 123. 4. 214. 341.
2009 MARSHALL 37. 12. 64. 112.
2010 MERCER 45. 1.. 98. 143.
2011 PERRY 47. 18. 56. 12O
2012 PULASKI 15. 2. 18. 35.
2013 ST.CLAIR 789. 244. 587. 1620.
2014 SCHUYLER 22. 0. 43. 65.
2015 scan 15. 1. 32. 47.
2016 WASHINGT 38. 2. 55. 96.
2017 WHITE 44. 4. 76. 123.
SUBTOTAL 1584. 319. 1997. 3099.
-------
w
t o
0
TABLE ?IB; ELECTRiCITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
l,000MWH i,000MWH I,00 0MWH 1, 0 00MWH
2021 CHAMPIIIG 554. 59. 510. 1123.
20 2 HENRY 157. 32. 260. 449,
2O 3 MACON 346. 286. 330. 962.
2024 MADISON 652. 500. 500. 1653.
2025 MCLEAN 283. 171. 348. 801.
2026 PEORIA 620. 287. 650. 1557.
2027 SANGAMON 544. 146. 544. 1234.
2028 TAZEWELL 30?. 305. 235. 848.
2029 WOODFORD 85. 9. 134. 228.
SUBTOTAL 3548. 1794. 3512. 8855.
-------
TABLE 21C: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 19&5 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUM11
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
CUu iY r A k COMPiLIUJAL iNCi JS R 1 L
1, 000MWH 1,000MWH 1,00 0MWH 1,000MWH
2030 ADAMS 171. 123. 220. 513.
2031 ALEXANDE 23. 8. 39. 70.
2032 BOND 34. 12. 46. 92.
2033 BUREAU 107. 27. 177. 312.
2034 CALHOUN 13. 0. 23. 36.
2035 CHRISTIA 92. 19. 170. 280.
2036 CLAY 37. 7. 52. 96.
2037 CLINTON 66. 15. 90. 172.
2038 CULES 124. 51. 175. 350.
2039 CRAWFORD 49. 38. 55. 162.
2040 CLJNBERLA 25. 2. 41. 69.
2041 DEWITT 50. 17. 79. 146.
2042 DOUGLASS 41. 39. 63. 149.
2043 EDGAR 56. 18. 95. 169.
2044 EDWARDS 7. 27. 10. 45.
2045 EFFINCHA 57. 13. lii. 181.
2046 FAYETTE 49. 7. 78. 134.
2047 FORD 46. 9. 98. 153.
2048 FRANKLIN 92. 7. 99. 198.
2049 FULTON 94. 58. 131. 283.
2050 GALLATIN 15. 4. 29. 48.
, 2051 GRUNDY 86. 23. 84. 192.
2052 HARDIN 11. 0. 15. 26.
2053 JACKSON 145. 19. 142. 306.
2054 JASPER 28. 2. 57. 86.
2055 JEFFERSO 81. 15. 101. 196.
2056 JOHNSON 18. 0. 23. 41.
2057 KANKAKEE 240. 111. 312. 729.
2058 KNOX 174. 88. 217. 478.
2059 LASALLE 286. 191. 380. 856.
2060 LOGAN 82. 53. 125. 259.
2061 MARION 100. 22. 127. 250.
2062 MCOONOUG 91. 22. 149. 262.
2063 MACOUPIN ii?. 8. 170. 295.
2064 MASON 50. 4. 82. 136.
2065 MASSAC 32. ii. 35. 77.
2066 MENNARD 3. 11. 6. 79.
2067 MONROE 56. 1. 64. 121.
2068 MONTGOME 75. 14. 135. 223.
2069 MORGAN 94. 46. 145. 286.
2070 NOULTRIE 36. 9. 56. 101.
2071 PuTT 37. 53. 38. 128.
2072 PIKE 47. 5. 115. 167.
2073 POPE 8. 0. 10. 18.
2074 PUTNAM 13. 4. 21. 38.
2075 RANDOLPH 78. 21. 92. 198.
2016 RICHLAND 8. 88. 13. 109.
2017 SALINE 64. 3. 103. 171.
2078 SHELBY 57. 5. 100. 162.
2079 STARK 21. 3. 44. 67.
-------
TABlE 21C: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN All OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIO NTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
l,000MWH l,000MWH I,000MWH 1,00 0MWH
2080 UNION 61. 9. 43. 92.
2081 VERMILLI 262. 160. 219. 701.
2082 WABASH 33. 16. 40. 89.
2083 WARREN 55,, 13. 122. 190.
2084 WAYNE 24. 43. 36. 103.
2085 WILLIAMS 102. 29. 132. 263.
2086 BOONE 60. 93. 63. 217.
SUBTOTAL 3966. 1826. 5556. 11349.
ORBES—TOTAL 9098. 3939. 11065. 24103.
-------
TABLE 2W EL CTRIC I EC F ILLINOIS YEAR i i
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1,000MWH t,000MWH 1,00 0MWH
2087 CARROLL 54. 5• 110. 169.
2080 COOK 18748. 9781. 14336. 42865.
2089 DEKALB 201. 98. 243. 542.
2090 DUPAGE 2248. 307. 1427. 3982.
2091 LODAVIES 57, 3, 93 , 133.
2092 KANE 978. 162. 879. 2020.
2093 KBJDALL 101. 0. 97. 197.
2094 LAKE 1818. 173. 1128. 3120.
2095 MCHENRY 367. 183. 304 854.
2096 OGLE 117. 60. l76 353.
2091 ROCKTSLA 494. 362. 399. 1256.
2098 LEE 96. 33. 146. 275.
2099 STEPHENS 125. 95. 169. 389.
2100 WHITESID 358. 65. 129. 551.
2101 WINNEBAG 169. 583. 524. 1876.
2102 WILL 704. 357. 617. 1618.
SUBTOTAL 27233. 12269. 20777. 60279.
STATE—TOTAL 36331. 16208. 31842. 84381.
(A)
-------
TABLE 22A: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN T i -sE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 00 0MWH l, 0 00MWH
2001 BROWN 32. 0. 46. 78.
2002 CASS 89. 6. 101.
2003 CLARK 86. 0. 118. ?05.
2004 GREEN 99. 7. 132. 238.
2005 HAMILTON 47. 4. 44. 95.
201$ HANt.OCK b. 1. 17$. 335.
2019 HENDERSO 53. 0. 72. 126.
2006 IROQUOIS 225. 30. 274. 529.
2007 JERSEY 121. 2. 95. 218.
2008 LAWRENCE 117. 0. 82. 200.
2020 LIVINGST 310. 7. 324. 640.
2009 MARSHALL 93. 19. 97. 208.
2010 MERLER 113. 1. 14R. 262.
2011 PERRY 117. 29. 85. 231.
2012 PULASKI 39. 3. 28. 69.
2013 ST.CLAIR 1984. 390. 988. 3270.
2014 SCHUYLER 56. 0. 64. 120.
2015 SCOTT 38. 1. 48. 87.
2046 WA H1NGT 97. 4. 83. 184.
20i7 WHITE 109. 7. 114. 231.
SIJ8TOTAL 3981. 520. 3022. 7523.
-------
TABLE 228: YEAR Z000 IN QF,- QRU S SPS A Gt L 4TI
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
l,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH J, 00 0MWH
2021 CItVIPAIG 1391. 91. 772. 2260.
2022 HENRY 395. 52. 394. 840.
2023 MACON 870. 466. 500. 1837.
2024 MADISON 1640. 817. 757. 3214.
2025 MCLEAN 711. 279. 526. 1515.
2026 PEORIA 1558. 468. 984. 3010.
2027 SANGAMON 1367. 238. 824. 2429.
2028 TAZEWELL 172. 499. 356. 1627.
2029 W000FORD 215. 14. 202. 431.
SUBTOTAL 8919. 2929. 5314. 17162.
-------
TA8LE 22Cz ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
I,000MWH 1,000MWH I,000MWFI 1, 00OMWH
2030 ADAMS 429. 200. 332. 961.
2031 ALEXANDE 57. 13. 59. 129.
2032 BOND 85. 1 . 70. 174.
2033 B J EAU 270. 45. 268. 582.
2034 CALHOUN 33. 0. 34. 68.
203S CHRISTIA 231. 31.. 251. 518.
2036 CLAY 93. 11. 78. 1152.
2037 1INTON 167. 25. 136. 329.
2038 .OLES 312. 83. 265. 660.
2039 CRAWFORD 123. 62. 83. 268.
2040 CUP4BERIA 64. 4. 62. 130.
2041 DEWITT 127. 27. 119. 273.
2042 DCJJGLASS 117. 64. 96. 276.
2043 EDGAR 140. 30. 144. 313.
2044 EDWARDS 17. 45. 16. 78.
2045 EFFINGHA 144. 21. 168. 333.
2046 FAYETTE 122. 12. 119. 252.
2047 FORD 116. 15. 148. 279.
2048 FRANKLIN 230. ii . 150. 391.
2049 FULTON 237. 95. 198. 530.
. : 2050 GALLATIN 39. 6. 43. 88.
2051 GRUNDY 216. 37. 126. 380.
‘? 2052 HARDIN 27. 0. 23. 50.
2053 JACKSON 365. 31. 215. 611.
°‘ 2054 JASPER 71. 3. 86. 159.
2055 JFFFERSO 202. 24. 152. 319.
2056 JOHNSON 45. 0. 34. 79.
2057 KANKAKEE 603. 288. 472. 1364.
2058 KNOX 437. 144. 328. 908.
2059 LASALLE 719. 311. 575. 1605.
2060 LOGAN 206. 86. 189. 481.
2061 MARION 252. 36. 193. 481.
2062 MCDONOUG 228. 36. 225. 490.
2063 MACOUPIN 293. 14. 258. 564.
2064 MASON 126. 7. 124. 256.
2065 MASSAC 80. 17. 53. 150.
2066 MENNARO 7. 116. F. 131.
2067 MOJROE 140. 1. 97. 238.
2068 MONTGOME 189. 22. 204. 414.
2069 MORGAN 236. 75. 220. 532.
2070 MOULTRIE 91. 15. 85. 191.
2071 PlAIT 93. 87. 57. 238.
2072 PIKE 1 17. 8. 174. 300.
2073 POPE 20. 0. 15. 35.
2074 PUTNAM 32. 7. 31. 70.
2075 RANDOLPH 197. 44. 140. 381.
2076 RICHLANO 20. 163. 20. 183.
2077 SALINE 161. 5. 156. 323.
2078 SHELBY 143. 9. 151. 303.
2079 STARK 2. 4. 61. 123.
-------
TABLE 22CZ V AR Z000 It’I ALL- T1 R RB S C -JPIWI
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,00 0MWH 1,00 0MWH l,00 0MWH 1,0 00MWH
2080 UNION 102. 14. 65. 181.
2081 VERNILLI 659. 261. 423. 1343.
2082 wABASH 82. 26. 61. 16q.
2083 WARREN 139. 21. 184. 344.
2084 WAYNE 61. 70. 54. 185.
2085 WILLIAMS 256. 47. 200. 503.
2086 BOONE 151. 152. 96. 399.
SI. TOTAL 9969. 2981. 8408. 21358.
ORBES—TOTAL 22869. 6430. 16743. 46043.
-------
CARROLL
COOK
DEK AL B
DUP AGE
LODAV I ES
KANE
KENDALL
LAKE
MCHENR Y
OGLE
ROC K T SI A
LEE
STEPHENS
WHTTESID
WINNE BAG
WILL
SUBTOTAL
STATE—TOTAL
TABLE 220: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
COMMERCIAL
1 ,000MWH
8.
15967.
160.
501.
5.
265.
0.
283.
299.
91.
591.
54.
155.
106.
952.
582.
20028.
26458.
COUNTY NAME
2087
2088
2089
2090
209
209
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
COUNT IFS
RESIDENTIAL
I ,000MWH
135.
47125.
504.
5650.
143.
2459.
253.
4570.
922.
293.
1242.
240.
316.
e99.
1932.
1770.
b 8452.
91321.
INDUSTRIAL
1, 00 0MWH
167.
21692.
36A.
2159.
141.
1330.
146.
1707.
460.
267.
604.
222.
256.
1.4.
793.
934.
31439.
48182.
TOTAL
1 ,000MWH
310.
84184.
1033.
8310.
289.
4054.
399.
6560.
1681.
657.
2438.
515.
725.
1200.
3677.
3281.
119919.
165962.
-------
TABLE 23A: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BIUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2001 BROWN 102. 3. 413. 519.
2002 CASS 314. 55. 984. 1353.
2003 CLARK 289. 0. 1107. 1396.
2004 GREEN 339. 43. 1255. 1636.
2005 HAMILTON 162. 26. 426. 614.
2018 HANCOCK 528. 9. 1676. 2213.
2019 HENOERSO 175. 0. 658. R33.
2006 IROQUOIS 803. 207. 2720. 3730.
2007 JERSEY 405. 15. 887. 1307.
2008 LAWRENCE 388. 0. 758. 1146.
2020 LIVINGST 1121. 46. 3258. 4425.
2009 MARSHALL 351. 137. 1018. 1506.
2010 MERCER 371. 8. 1352. 1730.
2011 PERRY 479. 224. 965. 1668.
2012 PULASKi 139. 19. 276, 435.
2013 ST.CLAIR 8268. 3183. 10286. 21736.
2014 SCHUYLER 183. 0. 589. 772.
2015 SCOTT 126. 6. 446. 57 8.
2016 WASHINGI 332. 24. 797. 1153.
2017 WHITE 379. 45. 1101. 1525.
SUBTOTAL 15255. 4050. 30971. 50276.
-------
TABLE 23B: NATURAL C AS CONSUMPTION FUR YEAR 1985 IN QTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2021 CHAMPAIG 5020. 671. 7745. 13437.
2022 HENRY 1439. 363. 3992. 5794.
2023 MACON 4494. 4626. 7179. 16209.
2024 MADISON 12501. 11963. 16039. 40503.
2025 MCLEAN 2845. 2143. 5853. 10841.
202b PEORiA 6776. 3911. 11904. 22591.
2027 SANGAMON 5401. 1806. 9048. 16255.
2028 TAZEWELL 5306. 6581. 6795. 18682.
2029 WOODFORD 761. 98. 1995. 2853.
SUBTOTAL 44544. 32162. 70549. 147255.
-------
TABLE 23C: c,Th
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTiAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2030 ADAMS 2015. 1806. 4344. 8165.
2031 ALEXANDE 219. 99. 635. 953.
2032 BOND 338. 144. 780. 1262.
2033 BUREAU 1005. 319. 2777. 4100.
2034 CALHOUN 112. 1. 320. 433
2035 CHRISTIA 854. 221. 2643 3718.
2036 CLAY 344. 82. 803. 1229.
2037 CLINTON 630. 183. 1432. 2246.
2038 COIlS 1275. 649. 3O09 4933.
2039 CRAWFORD 604. 563. 1138. 324.
2040 CUMBERLA 113. 13. 308. 435.
2041 OB4ITT 490. 201. 1280. 1971.
2042 DOUGLASS 572. 596. 1302. 2470.
2043 EDGAR 537. 219. 1531. 2288.
2044 EDWARDS 0. 0. o. 1.
2045 EFFINGHA 525. 149. 1698. 2372.
2046 FAYETTE 436. 80. 1176. 1692
2047 FORD 416. 105. 1469. 1989.
2048 FRANKLIN 814. 16. 47 8. 2369.
2049 IULTUN 832. 639. t933. 3403,
2050 GALLATIN 143. 42. 444. 629.
2051 GRUNDY 857. 282. 1394. 2532.
2052 HAROIN 88. 0. 214. 302.
‘ ‘ 2053 JACKSON 1255. 206. 2056. 3518.
‘ o 2054 JASPER 235. 18. 794. 1047.
2055 JEFFERSO 750. 174. 1570. 2495.
2056 JOHNSON 148. 0. 312. 460.
2057 KANKAKEE 2854. 2622. 6209. 11685.
2058 KNOX 1890. 1193. 3943. 7026
2059 LASALLE 3296. 2742. 7327. 13365.
2060 LOGAN 915. 733. 2325. 3973.
2061 MARION 946. 262. 2018. 3226.
2062 MCDONOUG 847. 260. 2329. 3437.
2063 MACOUPIN 1006. 89. 2462. 355R,
2064 MASON 431. 43. 1178. 1653.
2065 MASSAC 321. 134. 596. 1051.
2066 HENNARD 29. 921. 97. 1053.
2061 MONROE 468. 9. 905. 1382.
2068 MONIGOME 674. 153. 2024. 2851.
2069 MORGAN 987. 605. 2558 4149.
2070 MOULTRIE 341. 106. 891. 1338.
2071 PlAIT 340. 613. 582. 1535.
2072 PIKE 394. 53. 1634. 2080.
2073 POPE 66. 0. 131. 197.
2074 PUTNAM 2380. 991. 6348. 9718.
2015 RANDOLPH 791. 339. 1566. 2 96 .
2076 R1CHLAND 93. 1310. 270. 1673.
2077 SALINE 545. 34. 1473. 2052.
2078 SHELBY 491. 59. 1447. 1997.
2079 STARK 18. 28. 631. M4.
-------
TABLE 23C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2080 UNION 366. 104. 682. 1172.
2081 VERMILLI 3058. 2322. 5450. 10830.
2082 WABASH 348. 209. 119. 1276.
2083 WARREN 519. 150. 1906. 2515.
2084 WAYNE 227. 499. 556. 1282.
2085 WILLIAMS 1041. 367. 2265. 3674.
2086 BOONE 965. 1873. 1710. 4547.
SUbTOTAL 42435. 25119. 99078. 167232.
ORBES—TOTAL 102232. 61931. 200596. 364762.
-------
TABLE 23D: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1 85 IN ALL t)t -IER CtWNU S
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2081 CARROLL 461. 54. 1581. 2095.
2088 COOK 236285. 153823. 302457. 692566,
2089 DEKAL8 2178. 1330. 4421. 7929
2090 DUPAGE 21253. 3621. 22581. 47455.
2091 LODAVIES 499. 35. 1363. 1897.
2092 KANE 10983. 2274. 16512. 29769.
2093 KENDALL 844. 0. 1357. 2201.
2094 LAKE 24224. 2884. 25167. 52276.
2095 MCHENRY 4201. 2625. 5833. 12665.
2096 OGLE 1234. 788. 3125. 5147.
2097 ROCKTSLA 7904. 728. 10687. 25819.
2098 LEE 1492. 638. 3827. 5957.
2099 STEPHENS 1484. 1410. 3365. 6259.
2100 WHITESID 3772. 858. 2269. 6900.
2101 WINNEBAG 12908. 12223. 14726. 39857.
2102 WILL 16379. 10349. 4033. 50761.
SUBTOTAL 346106. 200141. 443304. 989552.
STATE—TOTAL 448339. 262073. 643900, 1354305.
-------
TABLE 24M NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS TN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESiDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2001 BROWN 92. 4. 632. 72B.
2002 CASS 283. 82. 1503. 1868.
2003 CLARK 261. 0. 1691. J951.
2004 GREEN 305. 63. 1q18. t286.
2005 HAMILTON 146. 33. 650. 835.
2018 HANCOCK 476. 13. 2560. 3050.
2019 HENDERSO 158. 0. 1006. 1164.
2006 IRO9UOIS 725. 306. 4156. 5]R7.
2007 JER EY 365. 23. 1355. 1i43.
2006 LAWRENCE 350. 0. 1156. 1507.
2020 LIVINGST 1011. 68. 4911. 6057.
2009 MARSHALL 316. 203. 1556. 2076.
2010 MERCIR 334. 11. 2066. 2412.
2011 PERRY 432. 333. 1474. 2239.
2012 P JLASKI 126. 28. 422. 577.
2013 S .CLAIR 7456. 4716. 1S7 16. 21888.
2014 SCHUYLER 165. 0. 900. 1065.
2015 SCOTT 114. 9. 682. 804.
2016 WASHINGT 300. 3S. 1218.
2017 WHITE 342. 67. 1682. z09 1.
SUBTOTAL 13751. 600!. 47322. 67080.
-------
TABLE 24B NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN 0THE 5p1S* c--aFI-
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2021 CHAMPAIG 4528. 994. 11834. 17356.
2022 HU4RY 1298. 538. 6099. 7935.
2023 MACON 4053. 6854. 10969. 21876.
2024 MADISON 11274. 17726. 24501. 53507.
2025 MCLEAN 2566. 3176. 8943. 14685.
2026 PEORIA 6111. 5795. 18188. 30094.
2027 SANGAMON 4871. 2676. 13825, 21372.
2028 TAZEWELL 4785. 9752. 0382. 24919.
2029 WOODFORD 686. 144. 3048. 3879.
SUBTOTAL 40171. 47655. 107195. 195622.
-------
IABLE 24C: NA1URAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER OR8ES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF ILLINO IS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2030 ADAMS 1817. 2616. 6637. 11130.
2031 ALEXANDE 198. 147. 970. J 315 .
2032 BOND 305. 214. 1191. iliO.
2033 BUREAU 906. 472. 4243. 5621.
2034 CALHOUN 101. 1. 489. 591.
2035 CHRISTIA 710. 327. 4038. 5135.
2036 CLAY 3i1. 121. 1226. 1658.
2037 CLINTON 568. 272. 2180. 3029.
2038 COLES 1150. 962. 4598. 6710.
2039 CRAWFORD 544. 863. 178. 3146.
2040 CUNBERLA 102. 19. 411. 593.
2041 DBI!TT 442. 298. 1956. 2696.
2042 DOUGLASS 516. 883. 1990. 3389.
2043 EDGAR 485. 325. 2340. 3149.
2044 EDWARDS 0. 0. 0. 1.
2045 EFFINGHA 473. 220. 2595. 3289.
2046 FAYETTE 393. 118. 1797. 2309.
2047 FORD 375. 155. 2244. 2774.
2048 FRANKLIN 734. 113. 2259. 3406.
2049 FULTON 750. 946. 2954. 4b50.
2050 GALLATIN 129. 62. 679. 870.
2051 GRUNDY 773. . 417. 21.30. 3320.
° 2052 HARDIN 80. 0. 32?. 407,
2053 JACKSON 1132. 305. 314!. 79•
o 2054 JASPER 212. 26. 121’.. i452.
2055 JEFFERSO 6,7. 258. 2399. 3334.
2056 JOHNSON 133. 0. 471. 610.
2057 KANKAKEE 2574. 3885. 9488. 15946.
2058 KNOX 1704. 1768. 6025. 9497.
2059 LASALLE 2972. 6062. 11196. 18230.
2060 LOGAN 825. 1086. 3552. 5463.
2061 MARION 853. 389. 3083. 4325.
2062 MCOONOUG 7b4. 385. 3559. 4708.
2063 MACOUPIN 907. 132. 3762. 4802.
2064 MASON 389. 64. 1801. 2254.
2065 MASSAC 290. 199. 911. 1399.
2066 MENNARD 26. 1374. 148. 1568.
2067 MONROE 422. 14. 1383. 1819.
2068 MON1GOME 608. 226. 30Q3. 3927.
2069 MORGAN 890. 896. 3908. 5694.
2070 MOULTRIE 307. 158. 1361. 1826.
2071 PlAIT 301. 909. 889. 2105.
2012 PIKE 355. 78. 2496. 2930.
2073 POPE 60. 0. 200. 259.
2074 PUTNAM 2146. 1468. 9699. 13313.
2075 RANDOLPH 714. 502. 2392. 3608.
2076 RICHIAND 64. 1942. 412. 2438.
2011 SALINE 492. 51. 2250. 2793.
2078 SHELBY 443. 88. 2211. 2741.
2019 STARK 161. 42. 976. 1177.
-------
TABLE 24C; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR ZOoO IN ALL. OTI1 K G LIF4TI 5
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
2080 UNION 348. 155. 1042. 1545.
2081 VERNILLI 2757. 3441. 8328. 14526
2082 WABASH 314. 310. 1098. 1722.
2083 WARREN 468. 223. 2912. 36O2
2084 WAYNE 205. 739. 850. 1794.
2085 WIlLIAMS 939. 544. 3462. 4945.
2086 BOONE 870. 2775. 2613. 6257,
SUBTOTAL 38269. 38110. 151386. 221165.
ORBES—TOTAL 92196. 9116t. 306502. 490466.
-------
COUNTIES
COUNTY NAME
2087 CARROLL
2088 COOK
2089 DEKAIB
2090 DUPAGE
2091 LODAVIES
20 2 KANE
2093 KENDALL
2094 LAKE
2095 MCaIENRY
2096 OGLE
2097 ROCK1SLA
2098 LEE
2099 STEPtIENS
2100 WHITESID
2101 WINNEBAG
2102 WILL
SUB TOT AL
STATE—TOTAL
TOTAL
2911.
903155.
10690.
59035.
2585.
38504.
2834.
64574.
16591.
7055.
34168.
8139.
8570.
8141.
5225g.
66826.
1286031.
1776493.
TABLE 240: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN BILLIONS OF TUS
RESiDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
415. 80. 2416.
213088. 221927. 462140.
1964. 1970. 6756.
19166. 5366. 34503.
450. 52. 2083.
9904. 3370. 25229.
761. 0. 2073.
21846. 4214. 38454.
3794. 3890. 8913.
1113. 1168. 4775.
7128. 10711. 16329.
1346. 946. 5847.
1338. 2090. 5142.
3402. 1212. 3468.
11641. 18111. 22500.
14711. 15334. 36721.
312128. 296559. 617347.
404324. 388325. 983849.
•-4
to
-------
APPENDIX C
INDIANA
Sources for Tables
No. I l l—B —
1 U.S. Federal Power Commission, Typical Electric Bills,
1974.
3. Drysdale, Frank R., and Calef, Charles E., The Ener-
getics of the United States of America: An Atlas ,
(Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1976). Residential,
commercial and industrial consumption was determined
with the help of use factors as given in Eqs. (1),
(2), and (3) in the text and related discussion.
4 Ibid .
5 U.S. Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book,
1972 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973).
17 Growth rates for 1975—85 from Table 111—8-16 applied
to prices in Table Il l-B—i. Prices are in 1974 dol—
1 ars.
18 Growth rates for 1975—2000 from Table III-B-l6 applied
to prices in Table I ll—B—i. Prices are in 1974 dol-
lars.
21 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8—3.
22 Growth rates for 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
23 Growth rates for 1975—85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table III-B-4.
24 Growth rates in 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-4.
111-8-99
-------
-a
TABLE 18: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIAN IA
COLJP4TY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWI S/I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
026 ALLEN 8.42 3e6 51.44 3.4 2096. 1.7
3027 BOONE 6.15 2.7 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3028 CLAY 10.70 55.71 1.7 2039. 1.7
3050 DELAWAkE 8.29 3.3 53.99 3.6 1977 , 1.6
3029 FLOYD 10.70 ‘.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3030 HAMILTON 10.10 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.?
3031 HANCOCK 6.68 2.7 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3032 HENDRICK 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039.
3033 JOHNSON 9.68 3.° 55.71 3.7 2039.
3034 MADISON 6.56 3.4 55. 3. 2039.
3035 MARION 7.93 3.2 55.11 3.’ 2039. 1.7
3036 MARSHALL 7.63 3.1 55.11 3.7 2039. 1.7
3037 MORGAN 9.31 3.7 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.1
3038 SHELBY 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.1 2039. 1.1
3039 VANDERBU 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.1 203g. 1.1
3040 VIbO 10.70 4.3 55.11 3.7 2039. 1.7
-------
TA8S_E ICZ L CTftI 1TY PRIG 5 R F P
IN THE STATE OP INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIA COMMFRCIAL iNDUSTRIAL I
$/25OKWH /KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/120,00 KWH C/KWH
3041. ADAMS 6.29 3.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3042 BARThOLO 8.68 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.1
3043 BENIGN 8.71. 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3044 BLACKFOR 8.29 3.3 55.11 3.7 2039. l 7
3045 BRO%4 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039 1.1
3046 CARROLL 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039.
3047 CASS 7.1.0 2.8 55.71 3 7 2039. .7
3048 CLINTON 7.40 3.0 55.71. 3 .7 2039. 1.7
3049 DECATEUR 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3051 FAYETTE 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.?
3052 FRANKLIN 10.10 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3053 FULTON 10.70 4.3 55.71. 3.7 2039. 1.7
3054 GRANT 8.73 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3055 HENRY 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3056 HOWARD 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 .2039. 1.1
3057 HUNTINGI 1.25 2.9 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3058 JASPER 6.70 2.7 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3059 JAY 8.29 3.3 55.71 3.7 2039
3060 JENNINGS 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.
3061 KOSCIUSK 8.71 3.5 3.7 2039. 1 .7
3062 14 1AM! 7.15 2.9 55.7 3.7 2039. 1.7
3063 MONROE 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039. l 1
- 3064 MONIGOME 6.92 2.8 55.71 37 2039. 1.7
3065 NOBLE 8.29 3.3 55.11 3.7 2039. 1.1
3066 ORANGE 6.70 2.7 55.71 3.7 2039 1.1
3067 OWEN 10.70 4.3 55.71 3,7 2039. 1.7
3068 PARKE 8.75 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3069 PULASKI 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.1
3070 PUTNAM 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.1
3071 RANDOLPH 8.29 3.1 55.71 3 ,7 2039. 1.7
3072 RIPLEY 10.70 4.3 55.71. 3.7 2039. 1.1
3073 RUSH 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3074 SCOTT 8.70 3.5 55.71 3,7 2039. 1.7
3075 STARKE 8.71 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3016 lIPTON 8.17 3.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3077 UNION 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3078 WABASH 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.?
3079 WASHINGT 10.70 4.3 55.71 3.1 2039.
3080 WAYNE 7.75 3.1 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.
3081 WELLS 6.90 2.8 55.71 3.7 2039. L 7
3082 WHITE 8.71. 3.5 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3083 WHITLEY 6.85 2.7 55.11 3.1 2039. 1.7
-------
TABLE ID ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN All OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OP INDIANIA
COLJITY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/2 SOKWH C/KWil $/I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
3084 DEKAL6 7.03 2.8 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3085 ELKHART 8.57 3.4 55.71 3.? 2039. 1.7
3086 LAGRANGE 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.7
3087 LAKE 8.71 3.5 74.96 5.0 1940. 1.6
3088 LAPORTE 8.71 3.5 55.71 3.? 2039. 1.7
3089 NEWTON 8.62 3.4 55.71 3.7 2039. 1.?
3090 PORTER 8.71 .5 55.71 3.? 2039. 1.?
309k STEUBEN 8.71 3.5 55.71 3.? 2039. 1.7
309. SJOSEPH 8.02 3.2 53.99 3.6 1997. 1.7
-------
TAQL 3A; ELECTR A5 1 LJl .Jl rU
IN THE STA1 OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,00 0MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,000MWH
3001 CLARK 266. 219. 293. 777. 0.
3002 CRAWFORD 12. 1. 14. 26. 0.
3003 DAVIESS 46. 10. 8 1. 143. 0.
3004 DEARBORN 104. 131. 108. 343. 5347.
3005 DLJBDIS 68. 39. 148. 255. 0.
3006 FtJJNTAIN 36. 15. 80. 131. 0.
3007 GIBSON 57. 14. 99. 170. 5633,
3008 GREENE 48. 6. 70. 124. 0.
3009 HARRISON 37. 5. 48. 90. 0.
3010 JACKSON 77. 29. 137. 243. 0.
3011 JEFFERSO 56. 18. 86. 161. 8459.
3012 KNOX 72. 17. 150. 238. 0.
3013 LAWRENCE 94. 38. 121. 253. 0.
3014 MARTIN 24. 13. 36. 73. 0.
3015 OHIO 7. 0. 7. 14. 0.
3016 PERRY 50. 37. 57. 145. 0.
3017 PIKE 18. 0. 29. 67. 6394.
3018 POSEY 45. 21. 85. 151. 0.
3019 SPENCER 24. 1. 41. 66. 0.
3020 SULLIVAN 33. 3. 50. 86. 2119.
3021 SWITZFRL 10. 0. 1.1. 21. 359.
3022 TIPPICAN 303. 124. 405. 831. 0.
3023 VERMILLI 37. 9. 46. 91. 840 ,
3024 WARREN 12. 0. 23. 35. 0.
3025 WARRICK 50. 0. 46. 96. 962,
SUBTOTAL 1585. 750. 2275. 4610. 30113.
-------
-4
-4
- 4
-a
C)
TABLE 36 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER OR8ES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAMtE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 0 0 0MWH I,00 0MWH I,000MWH
3026 ALLEN 930. 494. 1122. 2547. 0.
3027 BOONE 16. 18. 106. 200. 0.
3028 CLAY 43. 4. 60. 106. 0.
3050 DELAWARE 391. 215. 456. 1062. 0,
3029 FLOYD 149. 43. 137. 329. 3654.
3030 HAMILTON 153. 24. 134. 31fl. 249.
3031 HANCOCK 78. 5. 86. 169. 0.
3032 HENDRICK 123. 2. 102. 227. 0.
3033 JOHNSON 136. 25. 192. 352. 0.
3034 MADISON 517. 423. 591. 1531. 0.
3035 MARION 2727. 1320. 3183. 7230. 2179.
3036 MARSHALL 82. 24. 122. 228. 0.
3037 MORGAN 90. 6. 89. 185. 1865,
3038 SHELBY 90. 30. 134. 254. 0.
3039 VANDERBU 285. 24. 405. 714. 581.
3040 VIGO 268. 104. 466. 838. 5941.
SUBTOTAL 6137. 2762. 7383. 16282. 14469.
-------
TAbLL 3C: L CTRICI1Y COI4S1JPIPTIOr4 POI V AR
IN THE STATE O INDIAN1A
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDU TRIAL OTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,0 0MWH I, OOMWH 1,00 0MWH
3041 ADAMS 70. 34. 119. 223. 0.
3042 BARTHOLO 218. 187. 263. 668. 0.
3043 BENTON 17. 1. 54. 72. 0.
3044 BLACKFOR 52. 51. 70. 173. 0.
3045 BROWN 16. 0. 10. 26. 0.
3046 CARROLL 32. 4. 68. 105. 0.
3047 CASS 92. 29. 150. 272 0.
3048 CLINTON 64. 18. 116. 199. 0.
3049 DECATEUR 44. 18. 99. 161. 0.
3051 FAYETTE 83. 65. 107. 256. 0.
3052 FRANKLIN 27. 3. 39. 70. 0.
3053 FIJITON 38. 12. 64. 114. 0.
3054 GRANT 280. 252. 380. 912 0.
3055 HENRY 145. 66. 184. 395.
3056 HOWARD 308. 29 1. 427. 1026. 0.
3057 HUNTINGT 93. 40. 130. 264. 0.
3058 JASPER 30. 4. 85. 119. 0,
3059 JAY 59. 32. 92. 183. 0.
3060 JENNINGS 34. 5. 37. 76 0.
3061 KOSCIUSK 136. 88. 245. 470
• 3062 MIAMI 79. 18. 107. 203. 0.
‘ 3063 MONROE 263. 172. 294. 729. 0.
— 3064 MONTGOME 86. 44. 160. 290. 0.
3065 NOBLE 77. 33. 116. 226. 0.
3066 ORANGE 36. 21. 59. 116. 0.
3067 OWEN 20. 1. 24. 45. 0.
3068 PARKE 20. 1. 39. 60. 0.
3069 PULASKI 19. 4. 58. 81. 0.
3070 PUTNAM 61. 19. 88, 168, 0.
3071 RANDOLPH 76. 40. 11 .8. 34. 0,
3072 RIPLEY 45. 22. 7 . 144. 0,
3073 RUSH 33. 6. 7,. 116. 0.
3074 SCOTT 27. 0. 32. 59. 0.
3075 SIARKE 30. 4. 56. 90. 0.
3076 TIPTON 34. 6. 57. 97. 0.
3017 UNION 12. 1. 23. 36. 0.
3078 WABASH 103. 68. 163. 334. O
3079 WASHINGT 36. 10. 60. 106. ‘0.
3080 WAYNE 240. 157. 352. 749. 0.
3081 WELLS 77. 52. 106. ‘235. 0.
3082 WHITE 32. 0. 76. .108. 0.
3083 WHITLEY 55. 21. 90. 166. 0.
SUbTOTAL 3303. 1902. 4971. 10176. 0.
ORBES—TOTAL 11025. 5413. 14630. 31068. 44582.
-------
TABLE 3D YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1, 000MWH 1,000MWH 1,00 0MWH l,000MWH 1,000MWH
3084 DEKALB 84. 41. 99. 224. 0.
3085 ELKHART 522. 456. 612. 1590. 0.
3086 LAGRANGE 38. tO. 71. 119. 0.
3067 LAKt 1989. 1589. 2180. 5758. 64 0.
3088 L*PORTE 328. 177. 426. 931. b88.
3089 NEWTON 18. 3. 53. 74. 0.
3090 PORTER 277. 82. 221. 581. 2957.
3091 TEUBEN 45. 16. 81. 147. 0.
3092 TJOSEPH 736. 318. 8 5. 1939. 1114.
SUBTOTAL 4037. 2692. 4634. 11363. 12049.
STATE—TOTAL 15062. 8105. 19264. 42431. 56631.
-------
TABLE 4A; NATURAL C,AS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 UI QR 5 PL*I4T
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3001 CLARK 2801. 2282. 4045. 9128.
3002 CRAWFORD 177. 8. 265. 449.
3003 DAVIESS 618. 130. 1512. 2260.
3004 DEARBORN 1019. 1269. 391. 3618.
3005 DUBOIS 783. 449. 2242. 3674.
3006 FOUNTAIN 444. 181. 1287. 1911.
3007 GIBSON 744. 177. 1697. 2618.
3008 GREENE 676. 79. 1289. 2045.
3009 HARRISON 505. 73. 860. 1438.
3010 JACKSON 937. 355. 2193. 3485.
3011 JEFFERSO 700. 221. 140O 2328.
3012 KNOX 949. 217. 2597. 3763.
3013 LAWRENCE 1121. 454. 1897. 3472.
3014 MARTIN 275. 148. 539. 961.
3015 OHIO 110. 2. 134 246.
3016 PERRY 540. 396. 802. 1738.
3017 PIKE 274. 2. 587. 863.
3018 POSEY 531. 249. 1314. 2100.
3019 SPENCER 352. 16. 789. 1158.
3020 SULLIVAN 479. 41. 931. 1452.
3021 SWITZERL 155. 0. 229. 384.
3022 TIPPICAN 3629. 1466. 6343. 11438.
‘ 3023 VERI4ILLI 471. 112. 169. 1352.
-j 3024 WARREN 189. 0. 459. 648.
3025 WARRICK 771. 0. 937. 1708.
SUBTOTAL 19256. 8333. 36507. 64097.
-------
‘ -4
‘ -4
‘-4
-J
0
TABLE 48 NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 TN OTHER ORBES SNSA COUNTIFS
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BRJS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3026 ALLL 4 10626. 5588. 16776. 32990.
3027 BOONE 981. 237. 1197. 3015.
3028 CLAY 612. 51. 1111. 1780.
3050 DELAWARE 4429. 2417. 6759. 13605.
3029 FLOYD 1874. 533. 2250. 4658.
3030 HAMILTON 2079. 317. 237E. 4714.
3031 HANCOCK 1134. 18. 1634. 2846.
3032 HENDRICK 1881. 30. 2047. 3964.
3033 JOHNSON 1821. 326. 3373. 5520.
3034 MADISON 545 . 4421. 8173. 18051.
3035 MARION 31603. 15142. 48265. 95030.
3036 MARSHALL 1048. 297. 2O2 . 3373.
3037 MORGAN 1312. 89. 1694. 3096.
3038 SHELBY 1126. 367. 2181. 3673.
3039 VANDERBU 4423. 376. 8217. 13016.
3040 VIGO 3211. 1258. 7435. 11964.
SUBTOTAL 73683. 31527. 116145. 221355.
-------
TABLE 4C: NATURAL. GAS CONSUP1PTII N ‘Y A U J F,I ALl.. CPI
IN THE STATE OF INDIAN IAIN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3041 ADAMS 817. 389. 1827. 3034.
3042 BARTHOLO 2268. 1931. 3595. 7194.
3043 BRITON 255. 12. 1041. 1309.
3044 BLACKFOR 537. 519. 939. 1996.
3045 BROWN 261. 1. 200. 462.
3046 CARROLL 454. 61. 1255. 1770.
3047 CASS 1157. 365. 2459. 3981.
3048 CLINTON 828. 230. 1957. 3015.
3049 DECATEUR 545. 220. 1588. 2352.
3051 FAYETTE 889. 691. 1498. 3079.
3052 FRANKLIN 384. 43. 720. 1147.
3053 FULTON 468. 152. 1048. 1668.
3054 GRANT 2918. 2602. 5191. 10711.
3055 HaIRY 1700. 770. 2825. 5295.
3056 HOWARD 3180. 2975. 5162. 11917.
3057 HUNTIN6T 1109. 414. 2028. 3611.
3058 JASPER 426. 54. 1585. 2066.
3059 JAY 684. 361. 1381. 2426.
3060 JENNINGS 467. 67. 672. 1206.
— 3061. KOSCIUSK 1529. 981. 3602. 6112.
3062 MIAMI 1033. 227. 1827. 3087.
• 3063 MONROE 2890. 1869. 4233. 8992.
‘ 3064 MONTGOME 1008. 506. 2462. 3976.
- 3065 NOBLE 918. 390. 1813. 3121.
3066 ORANGE 413. 236. 871. 1521.
3067 OWEN 291. 20. 456. 767.
3068 PARKE 301. 9. 715. 1085.
3069 PULASKI 261. 54. 1029. 1344.
3010 PUTNAM 763. 241. 1435. 2439.
3071 RANDOLPH 872. 460. 1778. 3109.
3072 RIPLEY 533. 255. 1116. 1965.
3013 RUSH 450. 85. 1368. 1903.
3074 SCOTT 411. 0. 647. 1058.
3075 STARKE 422. 56. 100?. 1.485.
3076 TIPTON 459. 85. 996. 154!.
3077 UNiON 170. 11. 436. 623.
3078 WABASH 1143. 747. 2376. 4266.
3079 WASHINGT 461. 122. 1017. 1600.
3080 WAYNE 2668. 1719. 5112. 9503.
3081 WELLS 843. 569. 1513. 2925.
3082 wHITE 497. 0. 1524. 2021.
3083 WHITLEY 678. 250. 1443. 2371.
SUBTOTAL 38364. 20816. 76410. 135650.
ORBES—TOTAL 131302. 60616. 229120. 42110?,
-------
TABLE 40: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 IN All OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3084 DEKALB 966. 471. 1501. 2938.
3085 ELKHART 5451. 4114. 9374. 18539.
086 LAGRANGE 500. 124. 1209. 1833.
3087 LAKE 21729. 17180. 31159. 70068.
3088 LAPORTE 4834. 2578. 8200. 15613.
3089 NEWTON 253. 36. 9 1. 1270.
3090 PORTER 7342. 2161. 7675. 17179.
09I SjLUBEN 554. 194. 1409. 2157.
09 SiJOSEPH 8716. 3723. 13711. 26i50.
SUBTOTAL 50346. 31181. 74220. 155741.
STATE— IOTAL 181648. 91857. 303340. 576849.
-------
TABLE 5A; UTI1 R COMOM1G VARIABLES FOR YEAR Irl LJI I tL r .
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MTLLTONS) EMILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
3001 CLARK 2996. 75876. 227. 7. 232. 109. 25.
3002 CRAWFORD 2220. 8033. 18. 3. 1. 1. 1.
3003 DAVIESS 2515. 26602. 67. 21. 18. 37. 10.
3004 DEARBORN 2590. 29430. 76. 4. 119. 33. 14.
3005 DUBOIS 2591. 30934. 80. 21. 58. 54. 36.
3006 FfIJNTAIN 2603. 18257. 48. 15. 24. 34. 26.
3001 GIBSON 2574. 30444. 78. 21. 23. 42. 47.
3008 GREENE 2632. 26894. 11. ii . tO. 36. 21.
3009 HARRISON 2488. 20423. 51. 10. 9. 20. 6,
3010 JACKSON 2873. 33187. 95. 20. 45. 59. 18.
3011 JEFFERSO 2570. 27006. 69. 7. 28. 42. 40.
3012 KNOX 2533. 41546. 105. 25. 30. 76. 70.
3013 LAWRENCE 2731. 38038. 104. 6. 53. 56. 17.
3014 MARTIN 2333. 10969. 26. 4. 17. 14.. 4.
3015 OHIO 2494. 4289. 11. 2. 0. 3. 91.
3016 PERRY 2349. 19075. 45. 3. 41. 20. 8.
3017 PIKE 2505. 12281. 31. 8. 0. 16. 4.
3018 POSEY 2488. 21740. 54. 15. 31. 32. 30.
3019 SPENCER 2303. 17134. 39. 12. 2. 19. 16.
3020 SULLIVAN 2563. 19889. 51. 12. 6, 23. 9.
3021 SWITZERI 2518. 6306. 16. 4. 0. 4. 0.
L 3022 TIPPICAN 3103. 109378. 339. 21. 172. 188. 78.
- 3023 VERMILLI 2708. 16793. 45. 8. 14. 18. 11.
‘ 3024 WARREN 2524. 8705. 22. 13. 0. 6. 3.
3025 WARRICK 2690. 27972. 75. 7. 0. 25. 8.
SUBTOTAL 681201. 1844. 208. 933. 974. 594.
-------
TABLE 58: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COWTIES
IN THE SlATE OF INOJANIA
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MiLLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIOf S)
3026 ALLEN 3344. 280455. 938. 23. 617. 501. 7P?.
3027 BOONE l55. 30870. 97. 22. 30. 41. 53.
3028 CLAY 2677. 2393 . 64. 11. 7. 30. 17.
3050 DELAWARE 2985. 129219. 386. 17. 263. 191. 120.
3029 FLOYD 2964. 556 2. 165. 2. 59. 68. 35.
3030 HAMILToN 3455. 54432. 188. 17. 36. 59. 48.
3031 HANCOCK 3201. 35096. 112. 12. 10. 45. 17.
3032 HENDRICP( 3298. 53974. 176. 17. 4. 51. 12.
3033 JOHNSON 3027. 61138. 185. I . 42. 107.
3034 MADISON 3230. 138451. 447. i8. 453. 219. 6P.
3035 MARION 3534. 792299. 2800. 9. 1680. 1504. 3434.
3036 MARSHALL 2979. 34986. 104. 20. 37. 51. 42.
3037 MORGAN 2864. 44176. 127. 9. 11. 48. 10.
3038 SHELBY 2926. 37797. 111. 19. 45. 56. e5.
3039 VANDERBU 2933. 168772. 495. 7. 53. 318. 390.
3040 VI&O 2881. 114528. 330. 11. 159. 2 5, 26.
SUBTOTAL 2055148. 6721. 230. 3504. 3545. 5109,
o:i
-a
-a
-------
TABLE 5(.: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR I ,4 1P4 ALL. IJTH I OI
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME PERCAP1TA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESAL.
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALE
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MI..LTONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
3041 ADAMS 3010. 26 71. 82. 21. 49. 65. 0.
3042 BARTHOLO 3344. 57022. 191. 14. 203. 92. 51.
3043 8ENTON 3105. 11262. 35. 22. 2. 2 . 21.
3044 8LACKFOR 2799. 15880. 44. 6. 54. 22. 12.
3045 BROWN 2518. 9057. 23. 1. 0. 6. 0.
3046 CARROLL 2933. 17734. 52. 27. 9. 24. 25.
3047 CASS 2888. 40456. ii ?. 20. 46. 67. 66.
3048 CLINTON 2847. 30547. 8?. 24. 30. 49. 36.
3049 DECATEUR 2571. 22738. 58. 23. 30. 38. 30,
3051 FAYETTE 2881. 26216. 76. 9. 74. 36. 12.
3052 FRANKLIN 2366. 16943. 40. 11. 6. 16. 3.
3053 FULTON 2811. 16984. 48. 15. 19. 23. 15.
3054 GRANT 2926. 83 55. 246. 275. 136. 74.
3055 IlSIRY 2944. 52603. 155. 17. 88, 74. 24,
3056 HOWARD 3221. 83198. 268. 17. 314. l5 . 61.
3057 HUNTINGI 2982. 34970. 104. 16. 56, 52. 35.
3058 JASPER 2575. 20429. 53. 37. 8. 32. 22.
3059 JAY 2729. 23575. 64. 12. 43. 34. 29.
3060 JENNINGS 2312. 19454. 45. 6. 8. 17. 3.
3061 KOSCIUSK 3036. 48121. 146. 40. 1 17. 82.
3062 MIAMI 2607. 39246. 102. 20. 8. 44. 36.
L 3063 MONROE 2869. 84849. 243. 3. 197. 123.
—‘ 3064 MONTGOME 2960. 33930. 100. 26. 63. 61. 29.
°‘ 3065 NOBLE 2809. 31362. 68. 17. 47. 44. 19.
3066 ORANGE 2317. 16698. 39. 8. 28. 21. 11.
3061 OWEN 2421. 12163. 30. 5. 3. 12. 3.
3068 PARKE 2403. 14600. 35. 13. 1. 1*.. 6.
3069 PULASKI 2547. 12534. 32. 18. 8. 26. 22,
3070 PUTNAM 2761. 26932. 74. 16. 29. 33. 1 0.
3071 RANDOLPH 2845. 28c15. 82. 17. 54. 42. 17.
3072 RIPLEY 2461. 21138. 52. 12. 31. 29, II.
3073 RUSH 2549. 20352. 52. 24. 12. 3?. 16.
3074 SCOTT 2497. 17144. 43. 4. 0. 20. 5.
3015 STARKE 2415. 19280. 47. 10. 8. 29. 10.
3076 TIPTON 2917. 16650. 49. 17. 11. 20. 13,
307? UNiON 2939. 6582. 19. 10. 2. . 12.
3078 WABASH 2962. 35553. 105. 25. 86. 53. 26.
3079 WASHINGT 2478. 19218. 48. 14. 16. 23. 6.
3080 WAYNE 3046. 79109. 241. 20. 194. t43. 114.
3081 WELLS 3120. 23821. 74. 16. 63. 31. 124.
3O8 WHITE 2917. 20925. 61. 26. 0. 40. 124.
3083 WHITLEY 2883. 23395. 67. 14. 31. 37. 116.
SUBTOTAL 1262505. 3618. 690. 2344. 191P. 1365.
ORBES—TOTAL 3999454. 12189. 1208. 6781. 6436. 7069.
-------
COUNTY NAME
3084 DEKAL
3085 ELKHART
3086 LAGRANGE
3087 LAKE
3088 LAPORTE
3089 NEWTON
3090 PORTER
3091 STEUBEN
3092 STJOSEPH
SUBTOTAL
STATE—TOTAL
TABLE 5D OTHER ECONOMIC VAR1ABLE FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
2780.
35 lb.
2554.
3141.
3193.
2703.
3370.
2883.
3216.
30837.
86.
10.
52.
37.
126529.
20890.
546253.
105342.
l lt’ 06.
37)14.
20159.
265045.
645.
53.
1716.
336.
31.
294.
58.
786.
29.
22.
14.
24.
19.
12
9.
14.
482.
17.
1698.
225.
6.
ioa.
26.
421.
213.
24.
851.
178.
24.
91.
43.
424.
248.
16.
526.
84,
21.
94.
11.
484.
1193775.
3801.
151.
3034.
1898.
1511.
5193229.
15996.
1359.
9815.
8334.
8519.
-------
TABLE 11*: EL CTR1CITY PRICES FOR YEAR I e i,. -
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/250KWH C/KWH $/15 0 0KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
3001 CLARK 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3002 CRAWFORD 10.34 4.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3003 DAVIESS 10.34 4.1 59.33 6.0 2899. 2.4
3004 DEARBORN 8.31 3.3 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3005 DUBOIS 7.92 3.2 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3006 FOUNTAIN 9.96 4.0 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3007 GIBSON 10.74 4,3 59.33 4.0 2699. 2.4
3008 GREENE 10.01 4.0 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3009 HARRISON 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3010 JACKSON 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899, 2.4
3011 JEFFERSO 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3012 KNOX 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3013 LAWRENCE 11.40 4.6 59.33 6.0 2899. 2.4
3014 MARTIN 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3015 OHIO 10.34 4.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3016 PERRY 7.83 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3017 PIKE 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3018 PUSEY 9.43 3.8 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3019 SPENCER 9.43 3.8 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3020 SULLIVAN 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3021 SWITZERL 10.34 4.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
‘ ‘ 3022 TIPPICAN 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
— 3023 VERMILLI 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
z 3024 WARREN 10.34 4.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3025 WARRICK 7.88 3.2 59.33 4.0 2899. 2,4
-------
-
—a
TABLE t1B ELEC1RICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
s/25OKWH C/KWH $/I500KWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KWH C/KWH
3026 ALLEN 8.91 3.6 54.78 3.7 2981. 2.5
3027 BOONE 7.19 2.9 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3028 CLAY 11.40 4.6 59.33 6.0 28Q9. 2.4
3050 DELAWARE 8.83 3.5 57.50 3.8 2811. 2.3
3029 FLOYD 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3030 HAMILTON 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3031 HANCOCK 7.11 2.8 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3032 HENDRICK 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3033 JOHNSON 10.31 4.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2,4
3034 MADISON 9.12 3.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3035 MARION 8.45 3.4 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3036 MARSHALL 8.j3 3.3 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
037 MORGAN 9. 2 4.0 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
03B SHELBY 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3039 VANDERBU 9.18 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3040 VIGO 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
-------
TAOLE ITC: ELECTRICITY PRI E5 FOR YEAR t 6 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COIJNTIE5
IN THE STATE OF INDIAN IA
COUNTY NAME RE5IDENTIA COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH /KWH $/L50 0KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C/KWH
3041 ADAMS 8.83 3.5 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3042 BARTHOLO 9.24 3•7 59.33 4 0 2899. 2.4
3043 BEN1ON 9.26 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3044 BLACKFOR 8.83 3.5 4 0 2899. 2.4
3045 BROwN 9.18 3• 4.0 2899. 2.4
3046 CARROLL 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3047 CASS 7.56 3.0 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3048 CLINTON 7.88 3.2 4.0 2899. 2.4
3049 DECATEUR 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3051 FAYETTE 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3052 FRANKLIN fl40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3053 FULTON 1I.’.O 4.6 59.33 40 2899. 2.4
3054 GRANT 9.30 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899 2.4
3055 HENRY 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 289?. 2.4
3056 HOI4ARD 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
305? HUNTTNGT 7.72 3.l 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3058 JASPER 7.14 2.9 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3059 JAY 8.83 3• 4,0 2899. 2.4
_ 3060 JENNINGS 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2699. 2.4
3061 KOSCIUSK 9.28 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899, 2.4
3062 MIAMI 7.61 3.0 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3063 MONROE 9.18 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
. 3064 MONTGOME 7•37 2.9 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3065 NOBLE 8.83 3.5 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
° 3066 ORANGE 7.14 2.9 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3067 OWEN 1140 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3068 PARKE 9.32 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3069 PUlASKI 9.18 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3070 PUTNAM 11.40 4.6 59.33 4,0 2899. 2.4
3011 RANDOLPH 8.83 3.5 59•33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3072 RIPLEY fl.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3073 RUSH 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3074 SCOTT 9.27 3• 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3075 STARKE 9.28 3.? 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3076 TIPTON 8.70 3.5 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3077 UNION 9.18 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3018 WABASH 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3079 WASHINGT 11.40 4.6 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3080 WAYNE 8.25 3.3 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3081 WELLS 7.35 2.9 4.0 2899. 2.4
3082 WHITE 9.28 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3083 WHITLEY 7.30 2.9 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
-------
J
03
—a
0
TA6LE 17O ELECTRILITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RL S!DFNTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH $I1500KWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KW$1 C/KWH
3084 OEKAL8 7.49 3.0 59.33 4.0 2899, 2.4
3085 ELKHAR1 9.13 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3086 LAGRAN(. E 9.18 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
308? LAKE 9.28 3.1 19.83 5.3 .2759. 2.3
3088 LAPORTE 9.28 3.1 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3089 NEWTON 9.18 3.? 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3090 PORTER 9.28 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3091 STEUBEN 9.28 3.7 59.33 4.0 2899. 2.4
3092 SIJOSEPH 8.54 3.4 57.50 3.8 2840. 2.6
-------
TABLE 18A ELECTRICITY PRICES POR YEAR OOO IN ORBES PLA T COUNTIES
IN THE STATE Of INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH S/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
3001 CLARK 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3002 CRAWFORD 8.53 3.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3,0
3003 DAVIESS 8.53 3.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3004 DEARSORN 6.85 2.7 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3005 DUBOIS 6.53 2. 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3006 FOUNTAIN 0.21 3.3 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3007 GIBSON 8.85 3.5 48.91 3.3 36i5, 3.0
3008 GREENE 8.25 3.3 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3009 HARRISON 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3010 JACKSON 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615, 3.0
3011 JEFFERSO 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615, 3.0
3012 KNOX 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3013 LAWRENCE 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3014 MARTIN 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3015 OHIO 8.53 3.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3016 PERRY 6.45 2.6 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3017 PIKE 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3018 P0 5EV 7.77 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3019 SPENCER 7.77 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3020 SULLIVAN 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3021 SWITZERL 8.53 3.4. 40.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3022 TIPPICAN 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
L 3023 VERMILLI 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
“ 3024 WARREN 8.53 3.4 48.91 33 3615. 3.0
3025 WARRICK 6.50 26 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
-------
COUNTY NAME
RESIDENTIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH
TABLE 188 ELfECIRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COMMERCIAL
s/i 500KWH
INDUSTRIAL
C/KWH S/120,000KWH
C/KWH
3026
3027
3028
3050
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
ALLEN
BOONE
CLAY
DELAWARE
FLOYD
HAMILTON
HANCOCK
HENDRICK
JOHNSON
MADISON
MARION
MARSHALL
MORGAN
SHELBY
VANDERBU
VIGO
7.39
5.93
9.39
7.28
9.39
9.39
5.87
9.. 9
9.50
1.52
6.96
6.70
8.17
9.39
7.57
9.39
3.0
2.4
3.8
2.9
3.8
3.B
2.3
3.8
3.4
3.0
2.8
2.7
3.3
3.8
3.0
3.8
48.91
48.91
47.40
48.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
‘.8.91
48.91
48.91
48.91
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
.
3615.
3615.
3505.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3615.
3.0
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.C
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
I - s
I- .
-a
N)
N)
-------
TA81.F 18Cr EL. CYftICIrY PRICES PQ R ’I
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH S1 120,000KWH C/KWH
3041 ADAMS 7.28 2.9 40.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3042 BARTHOLO 7.62 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3,0
3043 BENTON 7.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3 0
3044 BLACKFOR 7.28 2.9 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3045 BROb 7.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3046 CARROLL 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3047 CASS 6.23 2.5 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3048 CLINTON 6.50 2.6 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3049 DECATEUR 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3051 FAYETTE 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3052 FRAM(LIN 9.39 3.8 48.9t 3.3 3615. 3.0
3053 FULTON 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3 0
3054 GRANT 7.66 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615 3.0
3055 HENRY 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3056 HOWARD 9.39 3.6 48.9i 3.3 3615. 3.0
3057 HUNTINGT 6.37 2.5 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3058 JASPER 5.88 2.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3059 JAY 7.28 2.9 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3060 JENNINGS 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3061 KOSCIUSK 7.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3062 MIAMI 6.28 2.5 48.91 3.3 3615 3.0
W 3063 MONROE 7.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
! 3064 MONTGOME 6.08 2.4 48.91 3.3 36t5. 3.0
3065 NOBLE 7.28 2.9 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3066 ORANGE 5.88 2.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3067 OWEN 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3068 PARKE 7.68 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3069 PULASKI 7.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3070 PUTNAM 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3071. RANDOLPH 7.28 2.9 48.91 3.3 3615. 3,0
3072 RIPLEY 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3073 RUSH 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3014 SCOTT 1.64 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3075 STARKE 7.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3076 TIPTON 7.17 2.9 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3071 UNION 7.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3078 WABASH 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3079 WASHINGT 9.39 3.8 48.91 3.3 3615. 3,0
3080 WAYNE 6.80 2.7 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3081 WELLS 6.06 2.4 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3082 WHITE 7.65 3.1 40.91 3.3 3615, 3.0
3083 WHITLEY 6.01 2.4 48.91 3.3 3615.. 3.0
-------
TABLE i D: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OP INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMFRCIAL INDUSTRIAL
/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I5 0 0KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C ,’XWH
3084 DEKALB 6.17 2.5 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3085 ILKHART 7.52 3.0 48.91 3.3 36J5. 3.0
3086 LAGRANGE 7.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 36i5. 3.0
3087 LAKE 7.65 3.1 65.81 4.4 3440. 2.9
3088 LAPORTE j.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3089 NEWTON 1.57 3.0 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3090 PORTER 7.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3091 STEU3EN 7.65 3.1 48.91 3.3 3615. 3.0
3092 S1JOSEPH 7.04 2.8 47.40 3.2 3541. 3.0
-------
lABLE 21As LECTR1CITY CONSUMPTIOPI P cJ’ YEA ’ i a 1,1
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRiAL TOTAL
l,000MWH 1,0 00MWH 1,000MWH j,000MWH
3001 CLARK 587. 351. 445. 1383.
3002 CRAWFORD 26. 1. 21. 48.
3003 DAVIESS 102. 16. 132. 250.
3Q04 DEARBORN 230. 210. 165. 604.
3005 DUBOTS 150. 63. 225. 438.
3006 FOUNTAIN 80. 24. 122. 225.
3001 GIBSON 126. 22. 151. 299,
3008 GREENE 106. 9. 101. 222.
3009 HARRISON 81. 9. 73. 163.
3010 JACKSON 169. 47. 208. 425.
3011 JEFFERSO 125. 30. 131. 285.
3012 KNOX 158. 27. 228. 413.
3013 LAWRENCE 207. 62. 184. 452.
3014 MARTIN 53. 21. 55. 129.
3015 OHIO 16. 0. 10 26.
3016 PERRY Ill. 60. 87. 258.
3017 PIKE 39. 0. 44. 84.
3018 POSEY 100. 34. 129. 263
3019 SPENCER 53. 2. 62. 117
3020 SULLIVAN 74. 5. 75. 154.
• 3021 SWIT ERL 22. 0. 17. 39.
3022 TIPPICAN 669. 198. 615. 1483.
- 3023 VERNILLI 81. 14. 69. 164.
3024 WARREN 27. 0. 35. 62.
3025 WARRICK 110. 0. 70. 180.
SUBTOTAL 3503. 1203. 3459. 8165.
-------
TABLE 21 ; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIFS
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,00 0MWH I ,000MWH 1,00 0MWH 1 ,000MWH
3026 ALLEN 2056. 794. 1706. 4555.
3027 BOONE 167. 30, 161. 358.
3020 CLAY 94. 6. 91. 191.
3050 DELAWARE 864. 346. 693. 1902.
3029 FLOYD 330. 69. 208. 607.
3030 HAMILTON 338. 38. 203. 579.
3031 HANCOCK 112. 9. 130. 311.
3032 HENDRICK 272. 3. 155. 430.
3033 JOHNSON 300. 39. 292. 631.
3034 MADISON 1142. 679. 899. 2720.
3035 MARION 6026. 2119. 4839. 12983.
3036 MARSHALL 182. 38. 185. 405.
3037 MORGAN 199. 10. 135. 344,
3038 SHELBY 200. 48. 203. 451.
3039 VANOERBU 630. 39. 615. 1284.
3040 VIGO 593. 167. 708. 1468.
SUBTOTAL 13563. 4432. 1122?. 29218.
-------
TAeLE 2 LG EL CI 1C IT V DI S 1P PTZQII I — i. .-.- -. . .- ..‘ . -
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1, 000MWH l,000MWH l,00 0MWH 1,000MWH
3041 ADAMS 154. 54. 182, 390.
3042 BARTHOLO 681. 300. 400, 1181.
j043 BENTON 38. 1. q2. 121.
3044 BLACKFOR 115. 82. 106. 303.
3045 BROWN 36. 0. 15. 51.
3046 CARROLL 71. 1. 104. 182.
3041 CASS 204. 47. 228. 480.
3046 CLINTON 142. 29. 177. 348.
3049 DECATEUR 98. 29. 150. 277.
3051 FAYETTE 184. 105. 163. 452.
3052 FRANKLIN 61. 5. 60. 126.
3053 HiLTON 83. 20. Q8. 200.
3054 GRANT 618. 405. 578. 1601.
3055 HB4RY 320. 106. 279. 706.
3056 HOWARD 681. 46?. 648. 1797.
3057 HUNTINGT 206. 65. 198. 469.
3058 JASPER 66. 6. 129, 202.
3059 JAY 131. 51. 140. 322.
3060 JENNINGS 15. 8. 57. 139.
3061 KOSCIIJSK 301. 142. 373. 816,
s 3062 MIAMI 176. 28. 162. 364.
‘ 3063 MONROE 581. 276. 467. 1304.
- 3064 MONTGOME 190. 70. 244. 504.
t 3065 NOBLE 170. 53. 176. 39Q
3066 ORANGE 80. 34. 89. 203.
3061 OWEN 44. 2. 36. 82.
3068 PARKE 44. 1. 60. 105.
3069 PULASKI 42. 6. 88. 137.
3070 PUTNAM 135. 31. 133. 299.
3071 RANDOLPH 167. 65. 179. 411,
3072 RIPLEY 100. 35. 116, 252.
3073 RUSH 73. 10. 117. 200.
3074 SCOTT 59. 0. 49. 108.
3075 STARKE 67. 7. 84. 158.
3076 TIPTON 75. 10. 86. 172.
3077 UNION 26. 2. 35. 63.
3018 WABASH 227. 109. 248. 584.
3079 WASHINbT 79. 15. 92. 187.
3080 WAYNE 531. 251. 535. 1318.
3081 WELLS 170. 84. 160. 415.
3082 WHITE 71. 0. 115. 186.
3083 WHITLEY 122. 33. 131. 292..
SUBTOTAL 7299. 3053. 7556. 17908.
ORBES—TOTAL 24365. 8686. 22237. 55291.
-------
I -4
—a
TABLE 210: ELECTRiCITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,0 00MWH l, 0 0 0MWH 1,000MWH 1, 0 0 0MWII
3084 DEKALB 185. 66. 151. 402.
3085 ELKHART 1153. 732. 931. 2816.
3086 LAGRANGE 85. 15. 1O . 208.
3087 LAKE 4396. 2551. 3313. 10260.
3088 LAPORTE 726. 286. 647. 1657.
3089 NEWTON 40. 4. 81. 125.
3090 PORTER 613. 132. 337. 1081.
3091 STEUBEN 98. 2 . 132. 256.
3092 STJOSEPH 1627. 510. 1345. 3482.
SUBTOTAL 8922. 4320. 7044. 20286.
STATE—TOTAL 33287. 13008. 29281. 75576.
-------
TABLE 22A: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ORBES PLANT COUP4TIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL CUMMEJ CIAL NOUS ...
t,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 000MWH I,000MWH
3001 CLARK 1475. 573. 674. 2721.
3002 CRAWFORD 66. 1. 31. 99.
3003 DAVIESS 258. 26. 200. 483.
3004 DEARBORN 571. 343. 249. 1169.
3005 OUBOIS 376. 103. 341. 81Q.
3006 FOUNTAIN 201. 39. 184. 624.
3007 GIBSON 316. 36. 228. 581.
3008 GREENE 268. 15. 161. 444.
3009 HARRISON 204. 14. 110. 328.
3010 JACKSON 426. 77. 315. 818,
3011 JEFFERSO 313. 48. 198. 560.
3012 KNOX 398. 43. 345. 786.
3013 LAWRENCE 520. 100. 278. 899.
3014 MARTIN 133. 34. 83. 250.
3015 OHIO 40. 0. 15. 56.
3016 PERRY 280. 98. 132, 510.
3017 PIKE 99. 0. 61. 166.
3018 P05EV 251. 56. 195. 501.
3019 SPENCER 133. 3. 94. 230.
3020 SULLIVAN 186. 8. 114. 308.
3021 SWITZERL 55. 0. 26. 80.
° 3022 TIPPICAN 1682. 324. 930. 2937.
! 3023 VERMILLI 203. 23. 105. 331.
3024 WARREN 68. 0. 52. 120.
° 3025 WARRICK 276. 0. 106, 383.
SUBTOTAL 8804. 1964. 5234. 16002.
-------
TABLE 226: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUf1TIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMFRCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
I,000MWH 1,000MWH j,000MWH 1,00 0MWH
3026 ALIEN 5168. 1295. 2581. 9044.
3027 BOONE 420. 48. 244. 712.
3028 CLAY 231. 9. 131. 384.
3050 DELAWARE 2171. 565. 1048. 3704.
3029 FLOYD 829. 112. 315. 1256.
3030 HAMILTON 849. 62. 307. 1218.
3031 HANCOCK 432. 14. 197. 644.
3032 HENDRICK 684. 5. 235. 923.
3033 JOHNSON 753. 64. 1259.
3034 MADISON 2871. 1108. 136u. 5339.
3035 MARION 15146. 3459. 7322. 25926
3036 MARSHALL 458. 62. 260. 600.
3031 MORGAN 500. 16. 204. 720.
3038 SHELBY 502. 78. 308. 888.
3039 VANDERBU 1583. 64. 930. 2578.
3040 VIGO 1490. 273. 1071. 2834.
SUBTOTAL 34092. 7236. 16981. 58309.
-------
TABLE 22C: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORUES C( UNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
l,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,OuOMWII I,00 0MWH
3061 ADAMS 388. 88. 275. 751.
3042 BARTHOLO 1208. 490. 606. 2304.
3043 BENTON 96. 2. 124. 222.
3044 BLACKFOR 290. 134. 160. 584.
3045 BROWN 91. 0. 22. 113.
3046 CARROLL 180. 11. 157. 348.
3047 CASS 513. 17. 345. 936.
3048 CLINTON 358. 47. 268. 673.
3049 DECATEUR 246. 47. 227. 520.
3051 FAYETTE 463. 111. 247. 881.
3052 FRANKLIN 153. 8. 91. 251.
3053 FULTON 208. 32. 148. 388.
3054 GRANT 1554. 660. 875. 3089.
3055 HENRY sos. 174. 423, 1401.
3056 HOWARD 1712. 763. 981. 3456.
3057 HWTINGT 518. 106. 300. 924.
3058 JASPER 161. 10. 196. 373.
3059 JAY 330. 83. 211. 625.
3060 JENNiNGS 188. 13. 86. 287.
3061 KOSCIUSK 757. 231. 564. 1553.
3062 MIAMI 438. 46. 245. 729.
0 3063 MONROE 1460. 450. 617. 2587.
— 064 MONTGOME 478. 114. 369. 961.
065 NOBLE 427. 87. 267. 781.
3066 ORANGE 202. 55. 135. 392.
3067 OWEN 110. 4. 55. 169.
3068 PARKE 111. 2. 91. 203.
3069 PULASKI 107. 11. 133. 250.
3070 PUTNAM 339. 51. 201, 591.
3071 RANDOLPH 420. 106. 271. 797.
3072 RiPLEY 252. 58. 176. 486.
3073 RUSH 183. 17. 176. 376.
3074 SCOTT 149. 0. 16. 223.
3015 STARKE 169. 11. 128. 307.
3076 TIPTON 189. 17. 130. 336.
3077 UNION 65. 3. 53. 122.
3078 WABASH 571. 1 1 8. 376. 1125.
3079 WASHINGT 200. 25. 139. 364.
3080 WAYNE 1336. 410. RIO. 2555.
3081 WEL S 427. 137. 243. 808.
3082 WHI E 180. 0. 174. 354.
3083 WHI1LEY 307. 54. 207. 569.
SUBTOTAL 18346. 4984. 11434. 34764.
ORBES—TOTAL 61243. 14183. 33640. 109073.
-------
TABLE 22D ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1, 000MWH l,0 00MWH l,000MWH 1,000MWH
3084 DEKALB 464. 108. 2213. 800.
085 FLKHART 2898. 1195. 1408. 5501.
3086 LAGRANGE 213. 25. 1f3. 402.
3081 LAI(E 11050. 4166. 5013. 20227.
3088 LAPORTE 1824. 464. 979. 3261.
3089 NEWTON tOO. 7. 123. 230.
3090 PORTER 1540. 216. 509. 2265.
3091 STEUBEN 248. 41. 199. 488.
3092 STJOSEPH 4090. 833. 2035. 6958.
SUBTOTAL 22426. 7052. 10659. 40137.
STATE—TOTAL 83669. 21235. 44307. 149210.
-------
TA8LE 23As NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLM9T COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3001 CLARK 2454. 2815. 5210. 10539.
3002 CRAWFORD 155. 10. 341. 505.
3003 DAVIESS 541. 164. 1948. 2653.
3004 DEARBORN 893. 1598. 1191. 4282.
3005 DUBOTS 686. 566. 2881. 4139.
3006 FOUNTAIN 389. 227. 1657. 2273.
3007 GIBSON 651. 224. 2186. 3061.
3008 GREENE 593. 100. 1660. 2353.
3009 HARRISON 443. 92. 1107. 1642.
3010 JACKSON 821. 448. 2824. 4093.
3011 JEFFERSO 613. 2b6. 1804. 2704.
3012 KNOX 832. 273. 3345. 4450.
3013 LAWRENCE 982. 512. 2443. 3997.
3014 MARTIN 241. 186. 694. 1120.
3015 OHIO 97. 2. 173. 271.
3016 PERRY 413. 500. 1033. 2005.
3017 PIKE 240. 3. 756. 999.
3018 POSEY 470. 314. 1693. 2477.
3019 SPENCER 309. 21. 1016. 1346.
3020 SULLIVAN 420. 52. 1200. 1672.
3021 SWITZERL 136. 0. 295. 431.
3022 TIPPICAN 3179. 1847. 8170, 13196.
¶° 3023 VERMILLI 413. 141. 990. 1544.
3024 WARREN 165. 0. 591. 757.
3025 WARRICK 675. 0. 1207. 1882.
SUBTOTAL 16869. 10500. 47022. 74390.
-------
II
p - I
-J
(A)
TABLE 238: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COuNTIES
IN THE STATE OP INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3026 ALLEN 9308. 7041. 21607. 31957.
3027 BOONE 859. 299. 231’ S. 3673.
3028 CLAY 536. 64. 1439. 2039.
3050 DELAWARE 3880. 3045. 870’. 15631.
3029 FLOYD 1642. 612. 289°. 5212.
3030 HAMILTON 1821. 99. 3063. 5283.
3(131 HANCOCK 993. 99. 2105. ‘196.
30 HENDRICK 1653. 37. 2631. 4327.
30.i.i JOHNSON 1595. 411. 6345. 6351.
3034 MADISON 4181. 5570. 10526. 20877.
3035 MARION 21684. 19079. 62191. 108954.
3036 MARSHALL 918. 314. 2612. 3904.
3037 MORGAN 1149. 113. 2182. 3445.
3038 SHELBY 986. 462. 2809. 4257.
3039 VANDERBU 3875. 414. 10583. 14932.
3040 VIGO 2866. 1585. 9576. 14027.
SUBTOTAL 64546. 39724. 1 495Q4, 253865.
-------
TA&LE 23C; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 1P4 ALL OTHER OR ES CDUNTI S
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3041 ADAMS 716. 491. 2354. 3560.
3042 BARTHOLO 1987. 2433. 4630. 9050.
3043 BENTON 224. 15. 1341. 1580.
3044 BIACKFOR 471. 654. 1210. £335.
3045 BROWN 229. 1. 258. 487.
3046 CARROLL 398. 76. 1617. 2091.
3047 CASS 1013. 460. 3167. 464h
3048 CLINTON 725. 290. 2520. 3536.
3049 DECATEUR 477. 277. 2045. 2799.
3051 FAYETTE 779. 871. *930. 3580.
3052 FRANKLIN 336. 54. 928. 1318.
3053 FULTON 610. 191. 1350. i951.
3054 GRANT 2556. 3279. 6686. 12521.
3055 HENRY 1489. 910. 3638. 6098.
3056 HOWARD 2786. 3748. 7422. 13956.
3057 HUNTINGT 971. 597. 2612. 4181.
3058 JASPER 374. 69. 2042. 2484.
3059 JAY 599. 455. 1779. 2833.
3060 JENNINGS 409. 85. 865. 1359.
3061 KOSCIUSK 1340. 1236. 4640. 7215.
— 3062 MIAMI 904. 286. 2353. 3544.
, 3063 MONROE 2532. 2355. 5452. 10339.
. 3064 MONTGOME 883. 637. 3171. 4692.
3065 NOBLE 804. 492. 2335. 3631.
3066 ORANGE 362. 298. 1122. 1782,
3067 OWEN 255. 25. 587. 867.
3068 PARKE 263. 11. 999. 1273.
3069 PULASKI 229. 68. 1325. 1622.
3070 PUTNAM 668. 304. 184g. 2820,
3071 RANDOLPH 764. 579. 2290. 3632.
3072 RIPLEY 467. 322. 15 15. 2304
3013 RUSH 394. 107. 1762. 2263.
3074 SCOTT 360. 0. 834. 1193.
3075 STARKE 370. 70. 1297. 1737.
3016 TIPTON 402. 108. 1283. 1793.
3077 UNiON 149. 21. 561. 732.
3018 WABASH 1002. 941. 3060. 5003.
3079 WASI-IINGT 404. 154. 1309. 1867.
3080 WAYNE 2331. 2166. 6585. 11089.
3081 WELLS 738. 711. 1949. 3404.
3082 WHITE 436. 0. 1963. 2398.
3083 WHITLEY 594. 316. 1858. 2768.
SUBTOTAL 33607. 26229. 98492. 15832?.
ORBES—TOTAL 115020. 76452. 295107. 486581.
-------
COUNTY NAME
3064 DEKALB
3085 ELKHART
3086 LAGRANGE
3087 LAKE
3088 LAPORTE
3089 NEWTON
3090 PORTER
3091. STEUBEN
3092 STJOSEP’I
SUB TOT AL
STATE— IOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
846.
4175.
438.
1903 5.
4235.
222.
6432.
485.
7o35.
44103.
159123.
TOTAL
3 3.
21500.
2151.
80814.
1R046.
1531.
19041.
2545.
29986.
178986.
665568.
TABLE 230:
COUNTIES
NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL CT’IER
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF OTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
593. 1933.
5940. 10785.
156. 1551.
21647. 40133.
3249. 10562.
45. 1264.
2723. 9886.
245. 1815.
4691. 17660.
39288. 955q5 .
115140. 390702.
-------
TABLE 24A: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN 0RB S PLANT CQIJNWI
IN T 1E 5TAT OF INDIAP4IA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAM R SIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL.
3001 CLARK 2213. 4260. 1960. 14433.
3002 CRAWFORD 140. 15. 521. 675.
3003 DAVIESS 488. 242. 29??. 3707.
3004 DEARBORN 805. 2368. 2137. S9 1 0.
3005 008015 619. 839. 4411. 5869.
3006 FOUNTAIN 351. .337. 2532. 3220.
300? GIBSON 588. 331. 3340. 4258.
3008 GREENE 534. 140. 2537. 3220.
3009 HARRISON 399. 136. 1692. 2227.
3010 JACKSON 740. 664. 4315. 5719.
3011 JEFFERSO 553. 424. 2756. 3134.
3012 KNOX 750. 405. 5111. 6265.
3013 LAWRENCE 885. 848. 3134. 5467,
3014 MARVIN 211. 275. 1060. 1553.
3015 OHIO 07. 3. 264. 354.
3016 PERRY 426. 740. 1578. 2744.
3017 PIKE 217. 4. 1155, 1375.
3018 PUSEY . 424. 465. 2587. 3475.
3019 SPENCER 278. 31. 1553. 1862.
3020 SULLIVAN 379. 77. 1833. 2289.
3021 SWITZERL 122. 0. 451. 573.
‘ 3022 TIPPICAN 2867. 2736. 12484. 18081.
. 3023 VERMILLI 372. 209. 1513. 2094.
- 3024 WARREN 149. 0. 904. 1053.
3025 WARRICK 609. 0. 1845. 2454.
SUBTOTAL 15213. 15558. 71846. 102617,
-------
TABLE 24B; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COWTIES
TN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN 6 LLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
3026 ALLEN 8395. 10433. 33016. 51842.
3027 BOONE 775. 443. 3537. 4754•
3028 CLAY 483. 95. 2199. 2777.
3050 DELAWARE 3499. 4512. 13302. 21313.
3029 FLOYD 1481. 995. 4429. 6905.
3030 HAMILTON 1643. 592. 4679. 6914.
3031 HANCOCK 896. 146. 3216. 4258.
3032 HENDRICK 1491. 55. 4029. 5575.
3033 JOHNSON 1438. 609. 6639. 8686.
3034 MADISON 4312. 8253. 16084. 28649.
3035 MARION 24966. 28270. 95025. 148262.
3036 MARSHALL 828. 555. 3991. 5374.
3037 MORGAN 1037. 167. 3335. 4538.
3038 SHELBY 889. 685. 4292. 58 .65.
3039 VANDERBU 3494. 702. 16171. 20367.
3040 VIGO 2584. 2348. 14632. 19564.
SUBTOTAL 58210. 58861. 228573. 345643.
-------
TABLE 24C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 TM ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL CUMMEfcL.i AL I
3041 ADAMS 646. 721. 3596. 4969.
3042 BARTHOLO 1792. 3605. 7075. 12471.
3043 BENION 202. 23. 2069. 2274.
3044 BLACKFOR 425. 969. 1849. 3243.
3045 BROWN 206. 2. 396. 602.
3046 CARROLL 359. 113. 2470. 2942.
3047 CASS 914. 682. 4839. 6435.
3048 CLINTON 654. 430. 3851. 4935.
3049 DECATEUR 430. 410. 3125. 3965.
3051 FAYETTE 703. 1291. 2949. 4942.
3052 FRANKLIN 303. 80. 1418. 1801.
3053 FULTON 370. 283. 2063. 2716.
3054 GRANT 2305. 4858. 10216. 17380.
3055 HENRY 1343. 1438. 5559, 8340.
3056 HOWARD 2512. 5554. 11340. 19406.
3057 HUtiTINGT 876. 885. 3991. 5752.
3058 JASPER 337. 102. 3120. 3558.
3059 JAY 540. 75. 2718. 3933.
3060 JENNINGS 369. 125. 1322. 1817.
3061 KOSCIUSK 1208. 1831. 7089. 10128.
3062 MIAMI 816. 424. 3596. 4836.
• 3063 MONROE 2283. 3489. 8331. 14103.
‘ 3064 MONTGOME 796. 945. 4845. 6586.
- 3065 NOBLE 725. 728. 3567. 5021.
3066 ORANGE 326. 441. 1715. 2483.
3067 OWEN 230. 37. 897. 1164.
3068 PARKE 238. 17. 1526. 1780.
3069 PULASKI 206. 101. 2024. 2332.
3070 PUTNAM 603. 450. 2824. 3877.
3071. RANDOLPH 689. 858. 3499. 5045.
3072 RIPLEY 421. 477. 2315. 3213.
3013 RUSH 356. 159. 2692. 3206.
3074 SCOTT 324. 0. 1274. 1598.
3075 STARKE 333. 104. 1982. 2420.
3076 TIPTON 363. 159. 1961. 2483.
3077 UNION 135. 32. 857. 1024.
3078 WABASH 903. 1394. 4676. 6973.
3079 WASHINGT 365. 228. 2001. 2593.
3080 WAYNE 2108. 3210. 10061. 15379.
3081 WELLS 666. 1Q62. 2978. 4706.
3082 WHITE 393. 0. 2999. 3391.
3083 WHITLEY 536. 468. 2839. 3842.
SUBTOTAL 30307. 38864. 150492. 219663.
ORBES—TOTAL 103728. 113282. 450910. 667923.
-------
TABLE 240: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE SlATE OF INDIANIA IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
163. 879. 2954.
4306. 6802. 16479.
395. 231. 2380.
17166. 32075. 61322.
3819. 4814. 1613g.
200. 6?. 1931.
5800. 4035. 15105.
43?. 362. 2773.
6886. 6950. 26983.
39773. 58215. 146065.
143501. 171497. 596975.
COUNTY NAME
3084. DEKALB
3085 ELKHART
3086 LAGRANGE
3087 LAKE
3088 LAPORTE
3089 NEWTON
3090 PORTER
3091 STEUBEN
3092 STJOSEPH
SUB TOT AL
STATE—TOTAL
TOTAL
4596.
29587.
3006.
110562.
24771.
2198.
24941.
3573.
60819.
244053.
911976.
-J
0
-------
APPENDIX D
KENTUCKY
Sources for Tables
No. 1 1 1-B —
1 U.S. Federal Power Commission, Typical Electric Bills,
1974.
3 Drysdale, Frank R., and Calef, Charles E., The Ener-
etics of the United States of America: An Atlas ,
(Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1 976). Residential,
commercial and industrial consumption was determined
with the help of use factors as given in Eqs. (1),
(2), and (3) in the text and related discussion.
4 Ibid .
5 U.S. Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book,
1972 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973).
17 Growth rates for 1975—85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to prices in Table 1 1 1-B—i. Prices are in 1974 dol-
lars.
18 Growth rates for 1975-2000 from Table III-B-16 applied
to prices in Table 111-8—1. Prices are in 1974 dol—
1 ars.
21 Growth rates fo 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
22 Growth rates for 1975—2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
23 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table III-B-4.
24 Growth rates in 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-4.
III-B-141
-------
TABLE IA: ELIECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES PLANT COUNtiES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
RFcTnFNT IM COMMERCIAL INDUSTRiAL.
/i)UOKWH
4001 BALLARD 8,06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4002 BRACKEN 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 113c. 1 ,4
‘,003 BRECKINK 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 11V3. 1.4
4604 BUTLER 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4005 CARLISLE 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 17:5. 1.4
4006 GALLATIN 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4007 GREENUP 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4008 HENOERSO 7.75 3.1 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4009 LEWIS 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4010 LIVINGST 7.45 3.0 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4011 MARSHALL 8.06 3.2 66.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4012 MASON 0.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
401.3 MCLEAN 0.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4014 MEADE 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1 35. 1.4
4015 OWEN 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 t735. 1.4
4016 RUSSIL 8.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4017 SCOTT 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1.4
4018 TRIGG 8.06 3.2 46.05 3,1
4019 TRIMBLE 0.06 3.2 46.05 3.1 1 ,35. 1.4
4020 UNION 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4021 WEBSTER 9.08 3.6 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.6
-------
I —I
0:,
-J
TABLE 18: FLLCJRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1914 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTiAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH /I2O,OOOrWH C/KWH
4022 8OON 6.28 2.5 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4023 BOYD 1.75 3.1 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4024 CAMPBELL 6.28 2.5 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
‘.025 DAVIESS 7.43 3.0 42.04 2.8 1870. 1.6
4026 FAYETTE 8.03 3.2 45.84 3.1 1826. 1.5
4027 JEFFERSO o.12 2.4 44.23 2.9 1792. 1.5
4028 KENTON 6.28 2.5 52.09 3.5 1450, 1.2
-------
TA6LE id ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN AL..
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $I120,000KWH C/KWH
4029 ADAIR 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4030 ALLEN 7.10 2.8 46.05 3.1 J735. 1.4
4031 ANDERSON 8.03 3.2 46.05 31 1.4
4032 BARREN 8.45 3.4 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4033 BATH 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4034 BELL 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.6
6035 BOURBON 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.’.
4036 BOYLE 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4037 BREATHIT 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4038 BLJLLIT 6.12 2.4 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4039 CALUWELL 8.45 3.4 46.05 3.! 1735. 1.4
4040 CALLOWAY 6.22 2.5 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4041 CARROLL 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4042 CARTER ‘6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4043 CASEY 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4044 ClIRISTIA 5.11 2.0 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4045 CLARK 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4046 CLAY 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735 1.4
4047 CLINTON 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
‘.048 CRITTEND 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4049 CIJMBERLA 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1. 1735. 1.4
‘ 4050 EOMONSON 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4051. ELLIOT 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4052 [ STILL 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4053 FLEMING 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4054 FLOYD 7.62 3.0 46.05 31. 1135. 1,4
4055 FRANKLIN 7.10 2.8 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4056 HILTON 8.71 3.5 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4057 GARRARD 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.! 1735. 1.4
4058 GRANT 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4059 GRAVES 6.53 2.6 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4060 GRAYSON 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4061 GREENUP 7.62 3.0 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4062 HANCOCK 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4063 HARDIN 7.08 2.8 46.05 31 1735. 1.4
4064 HARLIN 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4065 HARRISON 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735 l 4
4066 HART 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4061 HENRY 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4068 HICKMAN 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4069 HOPKINS 7.16 3.1 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4070 JACKSON 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4071 JESSAMIN 8.15 3.3 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4072 JOHNSON 7.62 3.0 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4073 KNOTT 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
1735. 1.4
4014 KNOX 8.67 3.5 46.05 3.1
4075 LARNE 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4076 LAUREL 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1.735. 1.4
4017 LAWRENCE 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4078 LEE 6.92 2.8 46.05 34 1735. 1.4
-------
TABIF ic: CL .CTR1C1TY PRICFS FOR YEAI 191’s IN &LL flT FR OReES COUNTIES
I IH [ STATE OF KFNT(JCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIOINT IAL COMMERCIAL INOUSIRTAL
/25OKWH C/KWH /P500 KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C#KW
4019 LESlIE 6.92 2.11 46.05 3.1 1735. 1,4
‘.080 LETCHER 6.92 2. 46.05 3. 1735. 1.4
.s0tll LINCOLN 2.8 ‘.6.05 3 .1 1735. 1.4
‘.0 (12 LOGAN 6.81 2.7 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.6
4083 LYON 6. 2 2.b 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
MCCR*CK 8.45 3.4 ‘. .os 3.1 1135. 1.4
408? MCCK ARY 6.92 2.8 46.05 3. 1735. 1.6
4096 MAtHSO 1 7.35 2.9 46.05 3. 1735. 1.4
4087 MAGC1 FIN 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4088 MARION 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1135.
4089 MA’UIN 6.92 2.8 46.05 1.1 1735. 1.4
‘.090 M14IFEE 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735, 1.4
4091 MEKCIR d. 03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1 ,’.
O92 ME1CALFf 6. ’ ?? 2.8 46.05 3.1 113 . 1.4
‘.093 McI’ ROE .92 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.6
4094 MONTGOME 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4095 MORGAN 6.92 2.8 “6.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4096 MUHLENBE 8.03 3. 46.05 3.1 735. 1.4
‘.097 NELSON 9.41 3.8 46.05 3.1 735. 1.4
4099 NICHULAS 6.92 2.8 46.05 3,1 1135. 1.4
‘.099 OHIO 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 73’5, 1..
‘.100 CLOHAM 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.’.
— 4101 (IWSLEY 6.92 2.P 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.’.
‘102 PENDLETO 10.50 4.2 66.05 3.1 1735. 1.’
4103 PERRY 6.92 2. 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4104 PIKE 7.61 .O 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.’.
4105 POWELL 6.92 2.3 46.05 3.1. 1735. 1.’
4106 PULASKI 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4107 ROBERTSO 6.92 2.8 46.05 3.1 1135. 1.4
4108 ROCKCAST 6.92 2.8 46.05 3. 1735.
4109 ROWAN 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1. 1735. 1.’.
4110 SHEL8Y 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4111 SIMPSON 6.81 2.7 ‘,6.05 3.1 1735.
112 SPENCEK 6.92 2. 46.05 3.1 173 . 1.4
411. i TAYLOR 6.92 2.6 46.05 3.1 1715. 1.4
4114 1000 6.92 2.b 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4115 WARREN 5.95 2.’ , 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4116 WASHINGI .03 .2 46.05 3.1 l73 . 1.4
111 wAYNE 6.53 2.6 46.05 3.1 1735. 1.4
4118 WHITLEY 8.54 3.4 46.05 3.1. 1735. 1.4
6119 WOLFE 6.92 2.!5 46.05 3.1 17 15. 1.4
4120 W000FORD 8.03 3.2 46.05 3.1 1735. 1. ’ .
-------
TABLE 3*: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 91’ IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOJAL ENERATED
l,000MWH l,000MWH 1,000MWH I,00,MWH 1 O00NWH
4001 BALLARD 5. 0. 27. 32. 0.
4002 BRACKEN 3. 0. 15. 18. 0.
4003 BRECKINR 8. 0. 45. 54. 0,
4004 BUTLER 6. 1. 33, 42. 0.
4005 CARLISLE 2. 0. 12 14. 0.
4006 GALLATIN 2. 0. 9. 11. 0.
4007 GREENUP 54. 5. 94. 152 0.
4008 HENOERSO 50. 11. 273. 334. 557.
4009 LEWIS 5. 0. 21. 26. 0.
4010 LIVINGST 4. 0. &. 20. 615.
4011 MARSHALL 133. 183. 5:5. 832. 675.
4012 MASON 42. 25. 282, 349. 0.
‘.013 MCLEAN 5. 0. 29. 34. 0.
4014 MEADE 13. 0. 34. 41. 0.
4015 OWEN 3. 0. 18. 21. 0.
4016 RUSSEL 4. 0. 25. 30. 912.
4017 SCOTT 28. 6. 135. 170. 0.
4018 TRIGG 8. 1. 44. 53. 0.
4019 TRIMBLE 3. 0. 10. 13. 0.
4020 UNION 9. i 63. 72. 0.
4021 WEBSTER 9. 1. 45. 55, 404,
SUBTOTAL 397. 235. 1747. 2379. 3283.
-------
COUNTY NAME
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYI)
4024 CAMPdELL
4025 DAVIESS
4026 FAYETTE
4027 JEFFERSO
4028 KENTON
SUBTOTAL
TABLE 36: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 TN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 000MWH 1,0 00MWH 1,0 00MWH
62. 9. 199. 270. 0.
228. 158. 964. 1350. 0.
147. 18. 458. 623. 0.
194. 71. 906. 1170. 1149.
56 4. 234. 252R. 3330. 0.
11578. 625. 4240. 16443. 0.
172. 13. 577. 762. 5653.
12949. 1129. 9871. 23948. 6602.
-------
TABLE 3C: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1 74 IPI ALL OTHER ORBES cuur &
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL iNDUSTRIAL TOTAL GEN RATEO
1,00 0MWH 1 pO00MWH I,0 0 0MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,OuOMWH
4029 ADAIR 6. 0. 37. 43, 0.
4030 ALLEN 8. 1. 57, 66, 0.
4031 ANDERSON 15. 1. 65. 81. 0.
4032 BARREN 28. 2. 186. 2 1o. 0.
4033 BATH 4. 0. 21. 25. 0.
4034 BELL 19. 1. 105. 124. 172.
4035 BOUR6ON 16. 1. 96. p3. 0.
4036 BOYLE 48. 5. 249. i03. 0.
4037 BREATHIT 4. 0. 18. 22, 0.
4038 BULLIT 20. 0. 41. 61. 0.
4039 CALDWELL. 35. 4. 219. 257. 0.
4040 CALLOWAY 21. 1. 107. 129 0.
‘,041 CARROLL 20. 3. 93. 116. 0.
4042 CARTER 8. 0. 35. 43. 0.
4043 CASEY 10. 0. 49. 59. 0.
4044 CHRISTIA 65. 3. 349. 417. 0.
4045 CLARK 43. 3. 216. 263. 1602.
4046 CLAY 5. 0. 26. 31. 0.
4047 CLINTON 2. 0. 14. 16. 0.
4048 CRITTEND 4. 0. 18. 22. 0.
7’ 4049 CUMBERIA 3. 0. 18. 21, 0.
4050 EDNONSON 4. 1. 12. 17. 0.
L 4051 ELLIOT 2. 1. 6. 9. 0,
4052 ESTILL 9. 0. 31. 40. 0.
‘° 4053 FLEMING 4. 0. 29 33. 0.
4054 FLOYD 20. 0. 64. 84, 0.
4055 FRANKLIN 107. 38. 396. 541. 01.
4056 FULTON 5. 0. 48. 53. 0.
4057 GARRARD 4. 0. 25. 29. 0.
4058 GRANT 4. 0. 21. 31. 0.
4059 GRAVES 12. 32. 360. 464. 0.
4060 GRAYSON 10. 1. 60. 71. 0.
4061 GREENUP 23. 1. 128. 152. 0.
4062 HANCOCK 5. 0. 14. 19. 4009.
4063 HARDIN 107. 10. 343. 461. 0.
4064 HARLIN 23. 2. 98. 123. 0.
4065 HARRISON 20. 6. 125. 150. 0.
4066 HART 7. 1. 49. 57. 0.
4067 HENRY 5. 0. 29. 35. 0.
4068 HICKMAN 6. 1. 47. 54. 0.
4069 HOPKINS 30. 2. 137. 169. 0.
4070 JACKSON 4. 0. 13. ii. 0.
4011 JESSAMIN 10. 0. 40. 50. 0.
4072 JOHNSON 8. 0. 35. . 43. 0.
4073 KNOTT 6. 0. 13. 19. 0.
4074 KNOX 19. 2. 62. ‘84. 0.
4075 LARNE 7, 0. 38. 45. 0.
4076 LAUREL 19. 2. 91. 112. 0,
4077 LAWRENCE 1. 0. 24. 31. 0.
4078 LEE 2.. 0. 10. 12. .0.
-------
TABLE 3d ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE 0 F KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 000MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH
4019 LESLIE 4. 0. 11. 15. 0.
4080 LETCHER 9. 0. 33. 42. 0.
4081 LINCOLN 6. 0. 33. 39, 0.
408e LOGAN 37. 14. 226. 218. 0.
4083 L 9N 3. 0. 11. 14. 6R3.
4084 Mu.RACKE 109. 29. 517. 715. 9815.
4085 MCCREARY 6. 0. 23. 29. 0.
4086 MADISON 51. 9. 257. 311, 0.
‘.087 MAGOFFIN 4. 1. Ii. 15. 0.
4088 MARION 14. 3. 93. 110. 0.
4089 MARTIN 3. 0. 9. 12. 0.
4090 MENIFEI 1. 0. 6. 7. 0.
4091 MERLER 24. 5. 125. 154. 1325.
4092 METCALFE 3. 0. 18. 21. 0.
4093 MONROE 8. 1. 50. 59. 0.
4094 P4ONTGOME 25. 9. 160. 194. 0.
4095 MORGAN 3. 0. 15. 18. 0.
4096 MUHLENBE 20. 1. 82. 102. 13618.
4097 NELSON 38. 14. 209. ebl. 0.
4098 NICHOLAS 3. 0. 15. 18. 0.
4099 OHIO 16. 2. 72. 90. 0.
4100 OLOHAM 9. 0. 34. 43. C..
L 4101 OWSLEY 1. 0. 5. 6. 0.
C.JI 4102 PENDLETO 8. 1. 37. 46. 0.
4103 PERRY 8. 9. 45. 53. 0.
4104 PIKE 97. i. 3B. 136. 0.
4105 POWELL 5.. 0. 13. 18. 0.
4106 PULASKI 34. 6. 186. 226. 3309.
4107 ROBLRTSO 1. 0. 4. 5. 0.
4108 ROCKCAST 5. 0. 22. 27. 0.
4109 ROWAN 44. 2. 63. 79. 0.
4110 SHELBY 18. 3. 141. 162. 0.
4111 SIMPSON 3?. 16. 202. 256. 0.
4112 SPENCER 2. 0. 14. 16. 0.
4113 TAYLOR 8. 0. 42. 50. 0.
4114 1000 8. 1. 58. 67. 0.
4115 WARREN 102. 31. 549. 682. 0.
4116 WASHTNGT 9. 1. 57. 67. 0.
‘$117 WAYNE 7. 1. 41. 55. 0.
4118 WHITLEY 10. 1. 76. 87. 0.
4119 WOLFE 1. 0. 7. 8. 0.
4120 WOODFURD 46. 25. 237. 308. 334.
SUBTOTAL 1749. 303. 8286. 10338. 34921.
ORBES—TOTAL 15095. 1666. 19904. 36665. 45012.
STATE—TOTAL 15095. 1666. 19904. 36665. 45012.
-------
COUNTY NAME
4001 BALLARD
4002 BRACKEN
4003 BRECKINR
4004 BUTLER
4005 CARLISLE
4006 GALLATIN
4007 GRE ENUP
4008 KENDERSO
4009 LEWIS
4010 LIVINGST
4011 MARSHALL
4012 MASON
4013 MCLEAN
4014 MEADE
4015 OWEN
4016 RUSSEL
4017 SCOTT
4018 TRIGG
4019 TRINBLE
4020 UNION
4021 WEBSTER
SUBTOT AL
RESIDENTIAL
248.
162.
356.
201.
126.
92.
1069.
1138.
266.
193.
829.
578.
232.
564.
181.
208.
514.
211.
140.
397.
255.
8027.
TABLE 4A2 NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES P 1*141 COUP TIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
5. 319. 572.
0. 221. 383.
16. 472. 844.
26. 202. 429.
0. 172. 298.
0. 128. 220.
95. 446. 1610.
245. 1483. 2867.
0. 255. 521.
1. 191. 385.
1154. 769. 2753.
348. 932. 1858.
9. 315. 556.
0. 35?. 921.
0. 251. 438.
1. 290. 505.
133. 661. 1368 .
33. 294. 538.
0. 129. 269.
2 . 678. 1098.
35. 324. 615.
2131. 8891. 19048.
-------
COUN1Y NAME
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYD
4024 CAMPBELL
4025 DAVIESS
4026 FAYETTE
4021 JEFFERSO
4028 KENTON
SUBTOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
1286.
2221.
3334.
2960.
7819.
18056.
4920.
100596.
TOTAL
2411.
6027.
621 .
736
1941 8.
89165.
9251.
139912.
TABLE 48: NATUKAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS )F BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
193. 992.
1555. 2250.
401. 2482.
1089. 3314.
3262. 8338.
4261. 6849.
382. 3949.
11142. 26175.
-------
TABLE 4C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
4029 ADAIR 218. 4. 386. 668.
4030 ALLEN 280. 19. 465. 764.
4031 ANDERSON 334. 20. 354. lOB.
4032 BARREN 780. 61. 1261. 2103.
4033 BATH 183. 2. 266. 451.
4034 BELL 602. 24. 811. 1437,
4035 BOURBON 585. 20. 839. 1444.
4036 BOYLE 855. 93. l053 2001.
4037 BREATHIT 200. 1. j97. 398.
4038 BULLIT 786. 0. s96. 1182.
4039 CALOWELL 495. 55. 747. 1297.
4040 CALLOWAY 815. 35. 1003. 1853.
4041 CARROLL 310. 43. 342. 696
4042 CARTER 427. 0. 449. 876
4043 CASEY 298. 9. 343. 650.
4044 CHRTSTIA 1674. 85. 2147. 3907.
4045 CLARK 890. 70. 1061. 2022.
4046 CLAY 231. 2. 309. 541.
4047 CLINTON 139. 0. 202. 341.
4048 CRITTEND 205. 0. 259. 464.
4049 CW4BERLA 135. 5. 119. 319.
4050 EDMONSON 180. 24. 135. 339.
4051. ELLIOT 89. 23. 65. 177
!. 4052 ESTILL 292. 16. 243. 551.
4053 FLEMING 251. 0. 461. 712.
4054 FLOYD 161. 18. 596. 137?.
4055 FRANKLIN .1475.. 523. 1301. 3299.
4056 FULTON 220. 21. 508. 748.
4057 GARRARO 236. 0. 375. 611.
4058 GRANT 264. 0. 398. 662.
4059 GRAVES 1008, 452. 1213. 2674.
4060 GRAYSON 365. 32. 507. 903.
4061 GREENUP 675. 36. 899. 1610.
4062 HANCOCK 310. 0. 200. 510.
4063 HARDIN 2116. 268. 2083. 506?.
4064 HARLIN 763. 55. 772. 1590.
4065 HARRISON 417. 118. 631. 1166.
4066 HART 296. 22. 484. 802.
4067 HENRY 303. 23. 409. 735,
6068 HICKMAN 159. 36. 304. 499.
4069 HOPKINS 1122. 62. 1215. 2400.
4070 JACKSON 150. 3. 138. 291.
40fl JESSAMIN 514. 0. 488. 1002.
40, JOHNSON 355. 8. 364. 727.
4013 KNOTT 231. 1. 120. 352,
4074 KNOX 446. 55. 341. 862.
4075 LARNE 277. 17. 356. 647.
4076 LAUREL 585. 60. 663. 1308.
4077 LAWRENCE 226. 12. 184. 422.
4078 LEE 103. 2. 122. 227.
-------
TABLE 4C; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL iNDUSTRiAL TOTAL
4079 LESLIE 161. 1. 112. 274.
4080 LETCH R 636. 0. 403. 839.
4081 LINCOLN 366. 0. 444. 810.
4082 LOGAN 637. 247. 928. 18)3.
4083 LYON 151. 0. 114. 271.
4084 MCCRACKE 2144. 577. 272g. 5650.
6085 MCCREARY 184. 13. 176. 373.
4086 MADISON 1242. 218. 1483. 2q44.
4087 MAGOFFIN 158. 24. tOe. 291.
4088 MARION 376. 73. 596. 1045.
4089 MARTIN 140. 0. 86. 226.
4090 MENIFEE 19. 0. 71. 150.
4091 MERCER 526. 115. 662. 1303.
4092 METCALFE 154. 2. 252. 408.
4093 MONROE 233. 35. 364. 632.
4094 MONTGOME 446. 169. 685. 1300.
4095 MORGAN 161. 10. 193. 364.
4096 MUHIENBE 755. .i2. 750. 1538.
4097 NELSON 640. 233. 841. 1714.
‘.098 NKHOLAS 11.1. 0. 156. 273.
4099 OHIO 488. 47. 524. 1060.
‘ 4100 OLOHAM 444. 0. 423. 867.
4101 OWSLEY 63. 0. 48. jil.
L 4102 PENDLETO 255. 22. 281. 64.
ui 4103 PERRY 446. 23. 638. 1107.
4104 PIKE 2286. 24. 212. 2522.
4105 POWELL 119. 4. 110. 293.
4106 PULASKI 880. 149. 1153. 2)82.
4107 ROBERTSQ 45. 0. 51. 102.
4108 ROCKCASi 233. 3. 251. 487.
4109 ROWAN 391. 41. 412. 850.
41 0 SHELBY 546. 102. 1018. 1666.
4 1i.1 SIMPSON 509. 217. 671. 1398.
4112 SPENCER 119. 0. 225. 344.
4113 TAYLOR 449. 0. 605. 1054.
4114 1000 252. 37. 4413. 737.
4115 WARREN 1869. 571. 2413. 4859.
4116 WASHINGT 247. 42. 396. 685.
4117 WAYNE 228. 31. 356. 615.
4118 WHITLEY 412. 30. 769. 1211.
4119 WOLFE 46. 0. 126. 172.
4120 WOODFORO 579. 315. 710. 1605.
SUBTOTAL 45372. 5856. 51653. 102881.
ORBES—TOTAL 153991. 19128. 88711. 261841.
STATE—TOTAL 153991. 19128. 88717. 261841.
-------
TABLE *: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
4001 BALLARD 2473. 8276. 20. 7. 1. 8. 2.
4002 BRACKEN 1877. 7221. 14. 5. 0. 5. 0.
4003 BRECKINR 1972. 14789. 29. 10. 2. 12. 2.
4004 BUTLER 1572. 9723. 15. 3. 3. 6. 2.
4005 CARLISLE 1969. 5354. 11. 4. 0. 4. 3.
4006 GALLATIN 1844. 4134. B. 2. 0. 4. 0,
4007 GREENUP 2236. 33192. 74. 2. 10. 16. 1.
4008 HENDERSO 2431. 36031. 88. 14. 28. 52.
4009 LEWIS 1131. 12355. 21. 5. 0. 7. A’
4010 LIVINGST 2037. 7596. 15. 4. 0. 5.
4011 MARSHALL 2365. 20381. 48. 2. 100. 24. 7.
4012 MASON 2407. 17273. 42. 9. 37. 29. 39.
4013 MCLEAN 2116. 9062. 1.9. 6. 1. 9. 1
4014 MEADE 2273. 18796. 43. 5. 0 11.
4015 OWEN 2094. 1476. 16. 6. 0. 6. 1.
4016 RUSSEL 1635. 10542. 17. 5. 1. 9. 5.
4017 SCOTT 2401. 17948. 43. 11. 15. 17. 5.
4018 TRIGG 1944. 8620. 17. 6. 4. 7. 1.
4019 TRIMBLE 2073. 5349. 11. 4. 0. 2. 0.
s 4020 UNION 2117. 15882. 34. 16. 3. 17. 13.
4021 WEBSTER 2069. 13282. 21. 6. 6. 14. 2.
SUBTOTAL 283288. 612. 132. 211. 264. 86,
-------
COUNTY NAME
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYD
4024 CAMPBELL
‘.025 DAVIESS
4026 FAYETTE
4027 JEFFERSO
4028 KENTON
SUBTOTAL
PERCAPITA
INCOME
(DOLLARS)
2857.
2769.
2788.
2672.
3151.
3162.
2865.
TABLE 5Bz OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
TN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
32312.
52376.
8850).
79486.
174323.
6950550.
12 44O.
•
94.
145.
247.
212.
549.
21978.
311.
5.
2.
2.
16.
21.
7.
2.
21.
152.
44.
117.
342.
1792.
43,
83.
104.
120.
315.
1099.
169.
67.
40.
19.
383.
2014.
0.
7507488.
23596.
54.
2511.
1926.
2593.
‘ —I
01
0 i
-------
T*8LE 5Cz ?THIR CQNOMZCVARZABL S FUR YEAR 1914 IN AlL. OI aER I3*. tWJI.lTIt .
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
4029 ADAIR 1792. 13037. 23. 7. 1. 12. 2.
4030 ALIEN 1787. 12598. 23. 5. 2. 16. 3.
4031 ANDERSON 2521. 9358. 24. 5. 2. 10. 2.
4032 BARREN 2104. 28667. 60. 16. 7. 40. 40.
4033 BATH 1654. 9235. 15. 6. 0. 6. 0.
4034 BELL 1507. 31087. 47. 0. 3. 36. 13.
4035 BOURBON 2519. 18476. 41. 16. 2. 22. 10.
4036 BOYLE 2680. 21090. 51. 7. 9. 33. 35.
4037 BREATHIT 1119. 14221. 16. 0. 0. 9. 5.
4038 BULLIT 2223. 26090. 58. 4. 0. 13. 2.
4039 CAIDWELL 2195. 13179. 29. 6. 5. 19. 4.
4040 CALLOWAY 2361. 27692. 65. 8. 6. 38. 43.
4041. CARROLL 2311. 8523. 20. 3. 4. 9. 21.
4042 CARTER 1741. 19850. 35. 4. 0. 11. 4.
4043 CASEY 1733. 12930. 22. 6. 1. 9. 0.
4044 CHRISTIA 2195. 56224. 123. 18. 9. 73. 48.
4045 CLARK 2567. 24090. 62. 10, 7, 32. 20,
4046 CLAY 1025. 18481. 19. 1. 0. 13. 4.
4047 CLINTON 1453. 8174. 12. 3. 0. 7. 1.
4048 CRITTEND 2005. 8493. 11. 4. 0. 9. 2.
4049 CUMBERLA 1603. 6850. it. 3. 1. 5. 3.
— 4050 EDMONSON 1713. 8751. 15. 3. 3. 4. 0.
i 4051 ELLIOT 1325. 5933. 8. 1. 3. 2. 0.
4052 ESTILL 1153. 12152. 22. 1. 2. 9. 5.
4053 FLEMING 1956. 11336. 22. 9. 0. 14. 7.
4054 FLOYD 1632. 35889. 59. 0. 2. 26. 15.
4055 FRANKLIN 2970. 34481. 102. 5. 54. 47. 13.
4056 FULTON 1882. 10183. 19. 6. 3. 19. 13.
4057 GARRARD 2140. 9457. 20. 9. 0. 9. 11.
4058 GRANT 2244. 9999. 22. 6. 0. 14. 8.
4059 GRAVES 2315. 30939. 72. 12. 68. 31. 29.
4060 GRAYSON 1821. 16445. 30. 1. 4. 11. 0.
4061 GREENUP 2169. 10350. 22. 8. 2. 9. 7.
4062 HANCOCK 2460. 7080. 17. 3. 0. 4. 2.
4063 HARDIN 2574. 78421. 202. 11. 30. 78. 18.
4064 HARLIN 1593. 37370. 60. 0. 6. 34. 23.
4065 HARRISON 2274. 14158. 32. 10. 14. 17. 24.
4066 HART 1770. 13980. 25. 10. 3. 13. 22.
4067 HENRY 2399. 10910. 26. 11. 3. 10. 2.
4068 HICKMAN 2067. 6264. 13. 7. 4. 7. 12.
4069 HOPKINS 2332. 38191. 89. 6. 7. 50 , 23.
4070 JACKSON 1184. 10005. 12. 2. 0. 4. 0.
4071 JESSAMIN 2353. 17430. 41. 7. 0. 15. 0.
4012 JOHNSON 1615. 17539. 28. 0. 1. 16. 17.
4073 KNOTT 1161. 14698. 17. 0. 0. 5. 0.
4014 KNOX 1386. 23689. 33. 1. 6. 14. 7.
4015 LARNE 2103. 10672. 22. 7. 2. 10. 1.
4076 LAUREL 1675. 21386. 46. 4. 7. 26, 36.
4077 LAWRENCE 1605. 10726. 17. 1. 1. 1. 5.
4078 LEE 1282. 6587. 8. 0. 0. 5. 6.
-------
TABLE SC: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED REflIL WHOLESALE
INCOME INCOMI SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
4079 LESLIE 1057. 11623. 12. 0. 0. 5. 0.
4080 LETCHER 1496. 23165. 35. 0. 0. 18. 13.
4001 LINCOLN 1814. 16663. 30. 11. 0. 10. 2.
‘.082 LOGAN 2178. 21793. 47. 14. 28. 26. 15.
4083 LYON 2178. 5562. 12. 2. 0. 3. 0.
4084 MCCKACK 2773. 58281. 162. 4. 65. 114. 124.
4085 MCCREARY 1136. 1254q. 14. 0. 2. 8. 4.
4086 MADISON 2237. 42130. 96. 13. 25. 52. 41.
4087 MAGOFFIN 1266. 10443. 13. 0. 3. 5. 1.
4088 MARION 1797. 16114. 30. 10. 9. 18. P.
4089 MARTIN 1128. 9377. ii. 0. 0. 4. 0.
4090 MENIFEE 1541. 4050. 6. 1. 0. 2. 0.
‘.091 MERCER 2520. 15960. 40. 10. 13. 19. 12.
4092 METCALFE 1609. 8177. 13. 6. 0. t. 0.
4093 MONROE 1617. 11642. 19. 5. 4. 12. 5.
4094 MONTGOME 2188. 15366. 34. 7. 19. 23. 30.
4095 MORGAN 1399. 10019. 14. 2. 1. 7. 3.
‘-4 4096 MUSILENBE 2161. 27531. 60. 4. 4. 3C, 36.
4097 NELSON 2012. 23447. 47. 12. 26. 23. 12.
4098 NICHOLAS 2041. 6508. 13. 5. 0. 5. 3.
‘° 4099 OHIO 2027. 16790. 38. 4. 6. 19. 4.
4100 OLOHAM 2413. 14687. 35. 1. 0. 13. 2.
4101 OWSLEY 979. 5023. 5. 1. 0. 2. 0.
4102 PENDLElO 2017. 9949. 20. 5. 3. 8. 3.
4103 PERRY 1495. 25114. 38. 0. 3. 31. 20.
‘.104 PIKE 1695. 61059. 103. 0. 2. 5. 32.
4105 POWELL 172 i. 7704. 13. 1. 1. 4. 0.
4106 PULASKI 1954. 35234. 64. 9. 17. 43. 27.
4107 ROBERTSO 1688. 2223. 4. 2. 0. 1. 0.
4108 ROCKCAST 1534. 12245. 19. 3. 0. 8. 3.
4109 ROWAN 1770. 17010. 30. 1. 5. 17. 17.
4110 SHELBY 2401. 17948. ‘3. 18. 12. 28. 34.
4111 SIMPSON 223o. 18999. 42. 9. 27. 23. 24.
4112 SPENCER 1907. 5486. 10. 7. 0. 4. 0.
4113 TAYLOR 2168. 17138. 3 1. 7. 0. 21. 1.
4114. TODD 1942. 10823. 21. 10. 5. 11. 12,
4115 WARREN 2428. 57432. 13g. 14. 64. 89. 61.
4116 WASHINGT 1830. 10728. 20. 9. 5. 9. 7.
4117 WAYNE 1281. 14268. 18. 6. 4. 11. 2.
4118 WHITLEY 1576. 24145. 38. 7. 4, 34. 15.
4.119 WOLFE 1083. 5669. 6. 6. 0. 4. 0.
4120 W000FORO 2819. 14434. 4.1. 13. 33. 15. 1.
SUBTOTAL 1688285. 3381. 524. 653. 1744. 115 .
URRIS—TOTAL 9419061. 27594. 710. 3374. 3935. 3835.
STATE—TOTAL 9479061. 21594. 710. 3374. 3935, 3835.
-------
- -
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I50 0KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4001 BALLARD 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4002 BRACKEN 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4003 BRECKINR 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4004 BUTLER 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.
4005 CARLISLE 8.58 3.4 69.04 3.3 2467. 2.
4006 GALLATIN 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4007 GREENUP 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4008 HENDERSO 8.25 3.3 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4009 LEWIS 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4010 LIVINGST 7.93 3.2 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4011 MARSHALL 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
40a2 MASON 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4013 MCLEAN 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4014 MEADE 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2 67. 2.1
4015 OWEN 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4016 RIJSSEL 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4017 SCOTT 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.
4018 IRIGG 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 467. 2.
4019 TRIMBLE 8.58 3.4 49.04 3.3 467. 2.
4020 UNION 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4021 WEBSiER 9.67 3.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
-------
TABLE 178: ELECTRICiTY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTiES
IN THE STAlE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH /KWH $/L500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4022 BOONE 6.69 2.7 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4023 BOYD 8.25 3.3 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4024 CAMPt ELL 6.69 2.7 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4025 DAVIESS 7.91 3.2 44.77 3.0 2659. 2.2
4026 FAYETTE 8.55 3.4 48.82 3.3 2591. 2.2
4027 JEFFERSO 6.52 2.6 47.10 3.1 2548. 2.1
402$ KENTON 6.69 2.7 55.48 3.7 2062. i. ?
-------
YABL 17C8 FOR YEAR 198 IN ALL. QTHE () 5 Jr4wI
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/250KWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4029 ADAIR 855 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4030 ALLEN 7.56 3.0 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4031. ANDERSON 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4032 BARREN 9.00 3.6 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4033 BATH 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4034 BELL 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4035 BOURBON 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4036 BOYLE 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
403? BREATHIT 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4038 BULLIT 6.52 2.6 69.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4039 CALOWELL 9.00 3.6 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4060 CALLOWAY 6.62 2.6 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4041 CARROLL 8.55 3.4 69.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4042 CARTER 1.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4043 CASEY 7.31 2.9 69.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4044 CHRISTIA 5.44 2.2 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4045 ARK 8.55 3.6 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4046 CLAY 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4047 CLINTON 1.3? 2.9 49.04 3.3 246?. 2,1
4048 CRITIEND 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4049 CUMOERLA 7.3? 2.9 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4050 EDMONSON 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4051. ElLIOT 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
— 4052 ESTILL 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4053 FLEMING 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4054 FLOYD 8.1.2 3.2 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4055 FRANKLIN 7.56 3.0 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4056 FULTON 9.28 3.7 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4057 GARRARD 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4058 GRANT 1.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4059 GRAVES 6.95 2.8 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4060 GRAYSON 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4061 GREENUP 8.12 3.2 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4062 HANCOCK 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4063 HARDIN 1.54 3.0 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4064 HARLIN 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4065 HARRISON 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4066 HART 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4067 HENRY 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4068 HICKMAN 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4069 HOPKINS 8.26 3.3 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4070 JACKSON 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4071 JESSAMIN 8.68 3.5 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4072 JOHNSON 8.12 3.2 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4073 KNOTT 7.3 ? 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4074 KNOX 9.23 3.7 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4075 LARNE 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4076 LAUREL 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4077 LAWRENCE 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4078 LEE 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1.
-------
TABLE 17Cs ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUN1Y NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCiAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH $/I5 00KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/Kwh
4079 LESLIE 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4080 LETCHER 1.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4081 LINCOLN 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4082 LOGAN 7.25 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4083 LYON 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4084 MCCRACKE 9.00 3.6 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4085 MCCREARY 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4086 MADISON 1.83 3.1 49.04 3.3 2467. 2,1
4087 MAGOFFIN 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4088 MARION 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4089 MARTiN 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4090 MENI EE 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2667. 2.1
4091 I4ERCER 8.55 3.4 ‘.9.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4092 METCALFE 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4093 MWROE 7.31 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4094 MONTGOME 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4095 MORGAN 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4096 MUHIENBE 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 24 (7. 2.1
4091 NELSON 10.02 4.0 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4098 NICHOLAS 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
‘ 4099 OHIO 6.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
‘ 4100 DIDHAM 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
- 4101 OWSIEY 7e31 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2,1
4102 PENDLETO 11.18 4.5 49.04 3.3 2667. 2.1
4103 PERRY 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4104 PIKE 6.10 3.2 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4105 POWELL 1.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4106 PULASKI 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4107 ROBERTSO 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4108 ROCKCAST 7.37 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4109 ROWAN 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2667. 2.1
4110 SHELBY 8.55 3.4 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4111 SIMPSON 7.25 2.9 49.0’. 3.3 2467. 2.1
4112 SPENCER 1.37 2.9 ‘.9.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4113 TAYlOR 7.31 2.9 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4114 1000 1.31 2.9 ‘.9.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4115 WARREN 6.3’. 2.5 49.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
4116 WASHINGT 8.55 3.6 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4117 WAYNE 6.95 2.8 49.04 3.3 246?. 2.1
4118 WHITLEY 9.10 3.6 ‘.9.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4119 WOLFE 7.3? 2.9 49.04 3.3 2467. 2.1
4120 WOODFORD 8.55 3.4 ‘.9.04 3.3 2461. 2.1
-------
1*O*.E ID*Z IN HE SlATE A 200Q In t IJI4W U
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4001 BALLARD 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4002 BRACKEN 7.06 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4003 BRECKINR 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4004 BUTLER 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4005 CARLISLE 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4006 GALIATIN 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.? 3076. 2.6
4007 GREENUP 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4008 HENDERSO 6.80 2.7 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4009 LEWIS 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
4010 LIVINGST 6.54 2.6 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4011 MARSHALL 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4012 MASON 7.OS 2.8 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
4013 MCLEAN 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4014 MEADE 1.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4015 QWEN 7.08 2.8 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
6016 RUSSEL 1.08 2.8 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4017 SCOTT 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4018 TRIGG 7.03 2.6 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
4019 TRIMBLE 7.08 2.8 40.63 2.7 3076. 2.6
4020 UNION 1.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4021 WEBSTER 7.97 3.2 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
-------
TABLE 188: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/L5 00KWH C/KWH t/120,000KWH C/KWH
4022 BOONE 5.51 2.2 40.43 2.1 3076. 2.6
4&23 BOYD 6.80 2.7 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
4024 CAMPBELL 5.51 2.2 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.
‘,025 DAVTESS 6.52 2.t 36.91 2.5 3316. 2.8
‘p026 FAYETTE 7.05 2. 40.25 2.7 3237. 2.7
4027 JEFFERSO 5.37 2.1 38.83 2.6 317?. 2.6
4028 KENTON 5.51 2.2 45.74 3.0 2571. 2.1.
-------
TABLE IBC; ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR Z000 ru AlL OTt$ER UK es
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COIIITY NAMF RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIA l.
$/250KWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4029 ADAIR 7.05 2.a 40.43 2.7 3076. 2,6
4030 ALLEN 6.23 2.5 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4031 ANDERSON 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4032 BARREN 7.42 3.0 40.43 2.7 3076. 2 6
4033 BATH 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4034 BELL 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.1 3076. 2.6
4035 BOURBON 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4036 BOYLE 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.? 3076. 2.6
4037 BREATHIT 6.08 2 ,4 40.43 2,7 3076. 2.6
4038 BULLIT 5.37 2.1 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4039 CAIDWELL 7.42 3.0 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4040 CALLOWAY 5.46 2.2 40.43 2.7 3076. 2 6
4041 CARROLL 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3916. 2 6
4042 CARTER 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3u76. 2.6
4043 CASEY o.oe 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2 6
4044 CHRISTIA 4.49 1.8 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4045 CLARK 1.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076 2.6
4046 CLAY 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4047 CLINTON 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4048 CRITTEND 7.05 2.8 40.43 2 7 3076. 2.6
jr , 4049 CUMBERLA 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4050 EUNONSON 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4051 ELLIOT 6.08 2.4 40.43 2 7 3076. 2.6
4052 ESTILL 7.05 2.8 40.43 2 7 3076. 2.6
4053 FLEMING 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2,6
4054 FLOYD 6.69 2.7 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4055 FRANKLIN 6.23 2.5 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4056 FULTON 7.65 3.1 40.43 2.7 3076. 2 6
4057 GARRARD 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4058 GRANT 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016.’ 2.6
4059 GRAVES 5.73 2.3 40.43 2.7 3016o 2.6
4060 GRAYSON 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3Or6 2.6
4061 GREENUP 6.69 2.7 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4062 HANCOCK 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4063 HARDIN 6.22 2.5 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4064 HARLIN 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4065 HARRISON 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.? 3076. 2 6
4066 HART 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2,6
‘.067 HENRY 6.08 24 40.43 2.7 3076 2.6
4068 HICKMAN 6.08 2.4 40.43 2 7 3076. 2.6
4069 HOPKINS 6.81 2.? 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4070 JACKSON 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4071 JESSAIIIN 7.16 2.9 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4072 JOHNSON 6.69 2.7 40.43 2.7 3076. . 2.6
4073 KNOTT 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.? 3076. 2.6
4074 KNOX 7.61 3.0 40.43 2.7 .3076. 2.6
4075 LARNE 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3016. 2 6
4016 LAUREL 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4071 LAWRENCE 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.? 3076. ‘ 2.6
4078 LEE 6.08. 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
-------
TABLE 18C: ELECTRICIIY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORRES COUNTIES
IN THE S A1E OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25UKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
4079 LESLIE 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4080 LETCHER 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4081 LINCI)LIi 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
4082 LOGAN 5.98 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4083 LYON 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4084 MCCRACKE 1.42 3.0 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4085 MCCREARY 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4006 MADISON 6.45 2.6 40.63 2.7 3076. 2.6
4087 MAGOFFIN 6. OB 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4088 MARION 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.1 3076. 2.6
4089 MARTIN 6.08 2 .’s 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4090 MENIFEE 6.08 2.’. 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4091 MERCER 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4092 METCALFE 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4093 MONROE 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4094 MONTGOME 7.05 2.6 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4095 MORGAN 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4096 MUHLENBE 7.05 2.3 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4091 NELSON a.2e 3.3 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4098 NICHOLAS 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4099 OHIO 7.05 2.:) 40.43 2.1 3076. 2,6
4100 OLOHAM 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
- 4101 OUSLEY 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4102 PENDLETO 9.22 3.1 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4103 PERRY 6.00 2. ’. 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4104 PIKE 6.68 2.1 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4105 POWELL 6.00 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4106 PULASKI 7.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4107 RO8ERTSO 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4108 ROCKCAST 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
‘.109 ROWAN 7.05 ?.8 40.43 2.1 3076. 2.6
4110 SHELBY 1.05 2.8 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4111 SIMPSON 5.98 2.4 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
41 .2 SPENCER 6.06 2.4 40.43 2.1 3016. 2.6
41i3 TAYLOR 6.08 2.. 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4114 TODD 6.08 2.’. 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4115 wARREN 5.22 2.1 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4116 WASHIN ,T 7.05 2. 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4117 WAYNE 5.13 2.3 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
4118 WHITLEY 7.50 3.0 40.43 2.7 3016. 2.6
4119 WOLFE 6.08 2.4 40.43 2.1 3076. 2.6
4120 W000EORL) 7.05 2. 3 40.43 2.7 3076. 2.6
-------
TABLE 214; ELICTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR l9 5 IN OR6ES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000NWH 1,0 0 0MWH 1, 00 0MWH I,0 0 0MWH
4001 BALLARD 11. 0. 41. 52.
4002 BRACKEN 6. 0. 23 29.
4003 BRECKINR lB. 1. 69. 88.
4004 BUTLER ii. 2. 50. 69.
4005 CARLISLE 5. 0. 18. 2 .
4006 GALLATIN 4. 0. 14. 18.
4007 GREENUP 119. 8. 142. 269.
4008 HENOERSO lii. 17. 415. 543.
4009 LEWIS 11. 0. 32 43
4010 LIVINGST 9. 0. 24. 33.
4011 MARSHALL 294. 294. 783 1372.
4012 MASON 93 , 40. 429. 562,
4013 MCLEAN 11. 0. 44, 55.
4014 NEADE 29. 0. 52 80.
4015 OWEN 7. 0. 27 34.
4016 RUSSEL 10. 0. 39, 49.
4017 SCOTT 62. 10. 206. 278.
4018 TRIGG 17. 2. 67. 86.
4019 TRIMBLE 6. 0. 16. 22.
4020 UNION 19. 1. 95 116.
4021 WEBSTER 19. 2. 69. 90
SUBTOTAL 877. 377. 2656. 3910.
-------
—I
o.
03
TABLE 21B: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUN1IES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1,00 0MWH 1,0 0 0MWH I.000MWH
6022 BOONE 137. 15. 302. 454.
4023 BOYD 504. 254. 1465. 2223.
4024 CAMPBELL 326. 28. 696. 1050.
4025 DAVIESS 428. 113. 1377. 1918.
4026 FAYETTE 1255. 376. 3842. 5473.
4027 JEFFERSO 25587. 1004. 6444. 33035.
4028 KENTON 380. 21. 877. 1278.
SUBTOTAL 28617. 1811. 15003. 45432.
-------
TABLE 21C* ELECTRICITY NSUMPT!ON FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
P Th€ StAlE OF KENTUCKY
A 1E RESID NTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TO AL
1,OuOMWH I,000MWH 1, 0 0 0M WH 1,00 MWI-$
4029 ADAIR 14. 0. 56 70.
4030 ALLEN 18. 1. 87. 106.
4031 ANDERSON 33. 1. 99, 133.
4032 BARREN 61. 3. 283. 348
4033 BATH 8. 0. 33, 40.
4034 BELL 41. 1. 159. 201.
4035 BOURBON 36. 1. 146. 183.
4036 BOYLE 107. 8. 319. 494.
4037 BREATHIT 10. 0. 1. 36
4038 BULLIT 43. 0. 63.
4039 CALOWELL 77. 6. 332. 15.
4040 CALLOWAY 46. 1. 163. 211.
4041 CARROLL 45. 1 14h 190
4042 CARTER 18. 0.
4043 CASEY 22. 0. 74. 9
4044 CHRISTIA 144. s. 530. 679,
4045 CLARK 96. 5. 329. 430.
4046 CLAY 10. 0. 40. 50.
4047 CLINTON s. 0. 21. 26.
4048 CRITTEND 8. 0. 28. 36.
4049 CUMBERLA 7. 0. 27. 34.
‘ 4050 EDMONSOM 9. 1. 19. 29.
— 4051 ELLIOT , ,, 10. 15.
? 4052 ESTILL 20. 1. 67.
4053 FLEMING 8. 0. 4 ’ .. 53.
4054 FLOYD 43 1. 97• 141.
4055 FRANKLIN 238. 61. 602. 900.
4056 FULT0N 11. 72. 84.
4057 GARRARI) 8. 0. 38.
4058 GRANT 9. 0. 41.
4059 GRAVES 159. 51. 548. 758.
4060 GRAYSON 23. 1. 91. 115.
4061 GREENUP 51. 2. 194. 247.
4062 HANCOCK 11. 0. 21. 32.
4063 HARDIN 237. 11. 522. 776.
4064 HARLIN 51. 3. 149. 203.
4065 HARRISON 44. 9. 190. 242.
4066 HART 16. 1. 75. 92.
4061 HENRY 12. 1. 45.
4068 HICKMAN 13. 2. 71. 86.
4069 HOPKINS 67. 3. 208. 278.
0 JACKSON 8. 0. 20, 28.
I JESSAMIN 22. 0. 61. 83.
4072 JOHNSON 18. 0. 53. 71.
4073 KNOTT 13. 0. 20. 33.
4014 KNOX 43. 4. 94. 14 .
4075 LARNE 16. 1. 51. 7
4076 LAUREL 42. 3. 138. 184.
4077 LAWRENCE 15. 1. 36. 52.
4078 LEE 4. 0. 15. 20.
-------
TABLE 21C: ELECIRIC1TY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,00 0MwH 1,000MWH I,00 0MWH 1, 000MWH
4079 LESLIE 8. 0. 17. 25.
4080 LETCI-IER 19. 0. 51. 70.
4081 LINCOLN 14. 0. 49. 64.
4O8 LOGAN 82. 23. 344. 469.
4083 LYON 8. 0. 16. 24.
4084 MCCRACKE 240. 46. 818. 1164.
4085 HCCREARY 13. 1. 35. 48.
4086 MADISON 114. 14. 390. 518.
4087 MAGOFFIN 8. 1. 6. 25.
4088 MARION 31. 4. 1’.2. 177.
4089 MARTIN 7. 0. 13. 21.
4090 MENIFEE 3. 0. 8. 12.
c091 MIRCER 53. 1. 190. 251.
4092 METCALFE 6. 0. 28. 34.
‘.093 MONROE 17. 2. 76. 95.
4094 MONTGOME 55. 15. 243. 313.
4095 MORGAN 7. 0. 23. 29.
‘.096 M(JHLENBE 43. 1. 124. 169.
4091 NELSON 84. 22. 318. 424.
4098 NICHOLAS 6. 0. 23. 29.
‘ 4099 OHIO 36. 2. 110. 148.
4102 PENDLETO 18. 1. 51. 75.
4103 PERRY 17. 1. 68. 86.
4104 PIKE 215. 2. 57. 274.
4105 POWELL 11. 0. 20. 31.
4106 PULASKI 75. 9. 283. 368.
6107 ROBERTSO 2. 0. 6. 8.
4108 ROCKCAST 11. 0. 33. 44.
4109 ROWAN 32. 3. 96. 130.
4110 SHELBY 60. 5. 214. 259.
4111 SIMPSON 81. 25. 307. 413.
4112 SPENCER 4. 0. 22. 26.
4113 TAYLOR 17. 0. 65. 81.
4114 TODD 17. 2. 86. 107.
4115 WARREN 225. 50. 834. 1110.
‘.116 WASHINGT 19. 2. 87. 10 I.
4117 WAYNE 16. 2. 71. 8Q.
4118 WHITLEY 22. 1. 116. 139.
4119 WOIFt 1. 0. Ii. 13.
4120 WOO(WORD 102. 40. 360. 502.
SUBTOTAL 3865. 486. 12595. 16946.
ORBES—TOTAt. 33360. 2674. 30254. 66288.
STATE—TOTAL 33360. 267’.. 3025’.. 66288.
lABLE 22*: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTIUN rui uuu su
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
-------
TAOLE 22A: ELECTRICiTY CONSUMPTION FUK YEAR Z000 N QRb 5 PCA1
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1, 000MWH 1,000MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,00 0MWH
4001 BALLARD 28. 0. 62. 90.
4002 BRACKEN 15. 0. 35. 50.
4003 BRECKINR 46. 1. 104. 151.
‘.004 BUTLER 44. 3. 76. 123.
4005 CARLISLE 12. 0. 27. 39.
4006 GALLATIN 9. 0. 22. 31.
4007 GREENUP 298. 12. 215. 526.
4008 HENDERSO 279. 28. 628. 935.
4009 LEWiS 29. 0. 48. fl.
4010 LIVLNGST 22. 0. 37. 59.
4011 MARSHALL 740. 401. 1185. 2606.
4012 MASON 233. 65. 649. 947.
4013 MCLEAN 28. 1. 66. 95.
4014 MEADE 72. 0. 78. i SO.
4015 OWEN 18. 0. 41. 59.
4016 RUSSEL 24. 0. 59. 83.
4017 SCOTT 156. 17. 311. 485.
4018 TRIGG 42. 3. 102. 147.
— 4019 TRIMBLE 15. 0. 24. 39.
4020 UNION 49. 1. 144. 194.
4021 WEBSTER 48. 3. 104. 155.
SUBTOTAL 2205. 616. 4018. 6839.
-------
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYL)
4024 CAMPBELL
4025 DAVIESS
4026 FAYETTE
4027 JEFFERSO
‘.028 KENTON
SUBTOTAL
343.
1267.
819.
1077.
3155.
64315.
C L
7 .d J
71931.
24.
414.
46.
185.
614.
1639.
3 5 .
2957.
458.
2211.
1054.
2083.
581 3.
9151.
1326.
22102.
TOTAL
I ,000MWH
825.
3898.
19 1fi.
3344.
9583.
15105.
2317.
97590.
COUNTY NAMF
TABLE 22B: ELECTRICITY CO!ISUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
1,00 0MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,0 00MWH
OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
—I
—a
-------
TABLE 22C ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION UK Y *R OOO IN ALL OTHER ORb CO4U .
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1, 0 00NWH 1,0 00MWH 1, 000P4WH 1, 000HWH
4029 ADAIR 35. 0. 84. 119,
4030 ALLEN 46. 1. 132. 179.
4031 ANDERSON 82. 2. 150. 235,
4032 BARREN 153. 6. 628 587.
4033 BATH 20. 0. 49. 69.
4034 BELL 103. 2. 241. 346.
4035 BOURBON 89. 1. 222. 312.
4036 BOYLE 269. 14. 573. 856.
4037 BREATHIT 24. 0. 41. 65.
4038 BULLIT 109. 0. 95. 204.
4039 CAIDWELL 193. 10. 503. 705.
4040 CALLOWAY 116. 2. 247. 365.
4041 CARROLL 112. 1. 214. 333.
4042 CARTER 44. 0. 81. 125.
4043 CASEY 56. 1. 112. 169.
4044 CHRISTIA 362. 9. 802. 1172.
4045 CLARK 241. 9. 497. 747.
4046 CLAY 26. 0. 60. 87.
4047 CLINTON 13. 0. 32. 44.
4048 CRITTEPID 20. 0. 43. 62.
• 4049 CUNBERLA La. 0. 41. 59.
‘ ‘ 4050 EDMONSON 22. 1. 29, 52,
— 4051 ELLIOT 12. 1. 15. 28.
4052 ESTILL 49. 1. 7 1. 121.
4053 FLEMING 21. 0. 67 88,
4054 FLOYD 108. 1. 147. 257.
4055 FRANKLIN 597. 99. 910. 1606.
4056 FULTON 27. 1. 109. 138.
4057 GARRARD 21. 0. 58. 79,
4058 GRANT 24. 0. 62. 85.
4059 GRAVES 399. 83. 829. 1311.
4060 GRAYSON 57. 2. 138. 197
4061 GREENUP 128. 3. 294. 425.
4062 HANCOCK 29. 0. 32. 60.
4063 HARDIN 596. 27. 190. 14l3 u
4064 HARLIN 129. 4. 226. 359.
4065 HARRISON 110. 15. 287. 411.
4066 HART 40. 1. 113. 155.
4067 HENRY 29. 1. 68. 98.
4068 HICKMAN 33. 3. 108. 144.
4069 HOPKINS 168. 4. 315. 488.
4070 JACKSON 19. 0. 31. 51.
4011 JESSAMIN 56. 0. 92. 148.
4072 JOHNSON 45. 0. 80. 125.
4073 KNOTT 33. 0. 30. 63.
4074 KNOX 100. 6. 143. 257.
4075 LARNE 39. 1. 86. 127.
4076 LAUREL 107. 5. 209. 321.
4077 LAWRENCE 39. 1. 54. 94.
4078 LEE 11.1. 0. 23. 34.
-------
TABLE 22C; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKy
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,00 0MWH 1, 000MWH
4079 LESLIE 21. 0. 26. 47.
4080 LETCHE 48. 0. 77. 125.
4081 LINCOLN 36. 0. 15. 111,
4082 LOGAN 207. 37. 521. 765.
4083 LYON 19. 0. 24. 44.
4086 MCCI4ACKE 604. 76. 1328. 2008.
‘.085 MCCREARy 32. 1. 53. 85.
‘.086 MADISON 286. 23. 590. 900.
4087 MAGOFFIN 21. 1. 25. 47.
4088 MARION 78. 1. 214. 300.
4Of 9 MARTIN 19. 0. 20. 39.
4090 MENIFEE 8. 0. 13. 21.
4091 MERCER 132. 13. 288. 433.
4092 METCALFE 15. 0. 42. 57.
4093 MON 1OE 43. 3. 115. 161.
4094 MONTGOME 139. 24. 367. 530.
‘.095 MORGAN 17. 0. 34. 51.
4096 MLJHLENBE 109. 2. 187. 299.
4097 NELSON 212. 36. 481. 729.
4098 NICHOLAS 15. C l. 35. 50.
a 4099 OHIO 90. 4. 166. 260.
‘ 4100 OLOHAM 48. 0. 79. 127.
4101 OWSLEY a. 0. 10. 19.
4102 PENDLETO 44. 2. 86. 132.
4103 PERRY 42. 1. 104. 147.
4104 PIKE 541. 3. 87. 630.
4105 POWELL 28. 0. 30. 58.
4106 PULASKI 189. 15. 428. 63’.
4107 ROBERISO 4. 0. 10. 14.
4108 ROCKCAST 27. 0. 51.
4109 ROWAN 19. 4. 145. 229.
4110 SHELBY 100. 9. 323. 433.
4111 S1MP ON 204. 41. 464. 709.
4112 SPENCER 10. 0. 33. 43.
4113 TAYLOR 42. 0. 98. 140.
4114 TODD 44. 3. 133. 180.
4115 WARREN 566. 82. 1263. 1910.
4116 WASHINGT 47. 4. 131. 182.
4117 WAYNE 40. 3. 108. 150.
4118 WHITLEY 55. 2. 176. 232.
4119 WOLFE 4. 0. 17. 20.
4120 W000FORO 257. 65. 545. 861.
SUBTOTAL 9716. 793. 19058. 29561.
ORUES—TOTAL 83850. 4365. 45779. 133994.
STATE—TOTAL 83850. 4365. 45779. 133994,
-------
TABLE 23A: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTI
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BII.L.IONS OF US
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
4001. bALLARD 217. 6. 411. 634.
4002 BRACKEN 142. 0. 285. 427.
4003 BRECKINR 312. 21. 608. 940.
4004 BUTLER 176. 33. 260. 469.
4005 CARLISLE 110. 0. 222. 332,
4006 GALLATIN 80. 0. 165. 246
4007 GREENUP 937. 119. 575. 1631.
4008 HENOERSO 997. 309. 1910. 3217.
4009 LEWIS 233. 0. 329. 562.
4010 LIVINGST 169. 1. 246. 416.
4011 MARSHALL 727. 1454. 991. 3172.
4012 MASON 506. 438. 1201. 2145.
4013 MCLEAN 204. 11. 405. 620.
4014 MEADE 494. 0. 460. 954.
4015 OWEN 164. 0. 323. 487.
4016 RUSSEL 182. 9. 313. 565.
4017 SCOTT 503. 161. 852. 1522.
4018 TRIGG 185. 42. 378. 605.
4019 TRIMBLE 122. 0. 167. 289
4020 UNION 348. 29. 873. 1250.
4021 WEBSTER 224. 45. 417. 686.
SUBTOTAL 7031. 2685. 11451. 21167.
-------
COUNTY NAME
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYD
4024 CAMPBELL
4025 OAVIESS
4026 FAYETTE
4027 JEFFERSO
4028 KENTON
SUbTO! AL
RESIDENT IAL
1127.
1946.
2921.
2 93.
6849.
68317.
4310.
TOTAL
2647.
6804.
6623.
8234.
21698.
82566.
Q878.
138449.
TABLE 23b: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCI(Y IN BILLIONS OF BT(JS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
243. 1278.
1960. 2898.
505. 3197.
1372. 4269.
4110. 10739.
5365. 8821.
481. 50R7.
88122. 14039. 36289.
I - .
s — I
-J
-------
TABLE 23C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF U(JS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRiAL TOTAL
4029 ADAIR 243. 5. 498. 746.
4030 ALLEN 245. 24. 599. 868.
4031 ANDERSON 293. 25. 456. 774.
4032 BARREN 684. 7,. 1624. 2385.
4033 BATH 160. 2. S 343• 505.
4034 BELL 528. 30. 1044. 1602.
4035 BOURBON 512. 25. 1081. 1618.
4036 BOYLE 749. lii. 1357. 2223.
4037 BREATHIT 176. 1. 253. 430.
4038 BULLIT 689. 0. 510. 1198.
4039 CALOWELL 433. 69. 962. 1465
4040 CALLOWAY 714. 44. 1292. 2050,
4041 CARROLL 212. 54. 441. 767.
4042 CARTER 374. 0. 578 952.
4043 CASEY 261. ii . 442. p4.
4044 HRISTiA 1467. tuB. 2766. 4 ‘.0.
4045 CLARK 780. 89. 1367. 2236.
4046 CLAY 202. 2. 398. 602.
4047 CLINTON 122. 0. 260. 382.
— 4048 CRITTENO 180. 0. 333. 513.
4049 CUMBERLA 118. 6. 231. 355.
4050 EDMONSON 158. 30. 173. 362,
7 4051 ELLIOT 78. 29. 84. 191.
4052 ESTILL 256. 20. 313. 589.
4053 FLEMING 220. 0. 594. 814.
4054 FLOYD 667. 23. 710. 1460.
4055 FRANKLIN 1292. 659. 1676. 3627.
4056 FULTON 192. 26. 654. 872.
4057 GARRARD 207. 0. 483. 690.
4058 GRANT 231. 0. 513. 744.
4059 GRAVES 883. 570. 1563 3016.
4060 GRAYSON 319. 40. 653. 1012.
4061 GREENUP 591. 46. 1158. 1795.
4062 HANCOCK 271. 0. 258. 529.
4063 HARDIN 2379. 331. 2683. 5400.
4064 HARLIN 668. 69. 994. 1732.
4O 5 HARRISON 366. 149. 812. 1327.
4066 HART 259. 27. 624. 910.
4067 HENRY 265. 29. 527. 821.
4068 HICKMAN 139. 46. 392. 576.
4069 HOPKINS 983. 79. 1566. 2627,
4070 JACKSON 132. 3. 178. 313.
4071 JESSAMIN 450. 0. 629. 1079.
4072 JOHNSON 311. 11. 468. 790.
4073 KNOTT 202. 1. 155. 358.
4076 KNOX 391. 69. 439. .899.
4075 LARP4E 242. 21. 456. 719.
4076 LAUREL 512. 75. 854. 1442.
4077 LAWRENCE 198. 15. 237. 450.
6018 LEE 90. 2. 157. 250.
-------
ORBES COUNTIES
COUNTY NAME
4079 LiSLIE
‘.080 LETCHER
4081. LINCOLN
4082 LOGAN
4083 LYON
4084 MCCRACKE
4085 MCCKEARY
‘.066 MADTSOi’I
4087 MAGOFFIN
408 1 MARION
40 9 MARTIN
4090 MENIFEE
4091 MEI CER
4092 METCALFE
4093 MONROE
4094 MOtITGOME
4095 MORGAN
‘.096 MUHLENBE
‘.097 NELSON
4098 NICHOLAS
4099 OHiO
4100 ULOHAM
1 r 4101 OWSIEY
- 4102 PENDLETO
4103 PERRY
4104 PIKE
4105 POWELL
‘.106 PULASKI
4107 ROBLRTSO
‘.108 KOCKCAST
4109 ROWAN
41.10 SHELBY
4111 SIMPSON
4112 SPENCER
‘ ..L13 TAYLOR
4114 TODD
4115 WARREN
4116 WASHINGT
4117 WAYNE
4118 WHITLEY
4119 WOLFE
4120 WCmDFORO
SUBTOTAL
ORBES—TO IAL
STATE—TOTAL
TOTAL
287.
901.
892.
2066.
284.
6120.
404.
3274.
309.
1189.
233.
161.
1458.
462.
717.
1486.
402.
1669.
1937.
304.
1163.
934.
117.
621.
1241.
2306.
304.
2444.
113.
531.
932.
1918.
1585.
394.
1113.
844.
5412.
779.
697.
1389.
203.
1820.
113652.
213261.
273261.
TABLE 23C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
RFSIDFNTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
141. 1. 145.
382. 0. 519.
321. 0. 572.
558. 311. 1196.
138. 0. 147.
1878. 727. 3514.
161. 16. 221.
1088. 275. 1910.
139. 30. 140.
329. 92. 768.
123. 0. 111.
69. 0. 92.
461. 144. 853.
135. 3. 324.
204. 44. 469.
391. 213. 882.
141. 13. 248.
662. 41. 966.
561. 293. 1083.
102. 0. 201.
428. 59. 675.
389. 0. 545.
56. 0. 61.
223. 28. 370.
391.. 29. 821.
2003. 30. 273.
157.. 6. 141..
771. 188. 1485.
40. 0. 73.
204. 4. 323.
342. 59. 531.
419. 128. 1311.
‘.46. 274. 865.
105. 0. 28Q.
393. 0. 179.
221. 47. 577.
1637. 127. lO8.
216. 53. 510.
200. 39. 458.
361. 38. 990.
40. 0. 163.
507. 397. 91b.
39746. 1378. 66529.
134896. 24102. 1.14267.
134896. 24102. 11.4261.
-------
TA8L 24AS NATURAL GAS CONSIJNPIIUN V -UK YV A uuu iv uv
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
4001 BALLARD 196. 9. beth. b33.
4002 BRACKEN 128. 0. 435. 563.
4003 BRECKINR 281. 30. 929. 1240.
4004 BUTLER 158. 49. 398. 605.
4005 CARLISLE 99. 0. 339. 438.
4006 GALLATIN 72. 0. 253. 325.
4007 GREENUP 845. 176. 878. 1899.
4008 HENDERSO 899. 458. 2919. 4276.
4009 LEWIS 210. 0. 503. 712.
4010 LIVINGST 153. 2. 375. 530.
4011 MARSHALL 655. 2155. 1514. 4324.
4012 MASON 456. 650. 1835. 2941.
4013 MCLEAN 184. 17. 619. 820.
4014 MEADE 446. 0. 702. 1146.
4015 OWEN 148. 0. 494. 642.
4016 RUSSEL 164. 14. 570. 748.
4017 SCOTT 453. 248. 1301. 2003.
4018 TRIGG 167. 62. 578. 806.
4019 TRIMBIE 110. 0. 254. 365.
• 4020 UNION 314. 43. 1334. 1691.
4021 WEBSTER 202. 66. 638. 906.
SUBTOTAL 6341. 3978. 17497. 27816.
-4.
-------
COUNTY NAME
4022 BOONE
4023 BOYD
4024 CAMPBELL
4025 DAV1ESS
4026 FAYETTE
402? JEFFERSO
4028 KENTON
SUB 101 AL
RESIDENTIAL
1016.
1755.
2634.
2338.
6117.
61664.
3881.
TOTAL
3328.
9087.
8261.
10894.
2R675.
83097.
12372.
155720.
TABLE 248: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COtflJTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS Of BTUS
COMMERCIAL INOUSTRIAL
360. 1952.
2904. 4428.
748. 6885.
2033. 6523.
6090. 1640P.
7954. 13478.
713. 7712.
79470. 20802. 55448.
b-4
-a
OD
Q
-------
TABLE 24C NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR Y AI £IJUO IN ALL UII1t! upwr & -
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BIUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
4029 ADAIR 219. 7. 760. 987.
4030 ALLEN 221. 36. 915. 1172.
4031 ANDERSON 264. 37. 697. 998.
4032 BARREN 616. 115. 2482. 3213.
4033 BATH 145. 3. 524. 672.
4034 BELL 476. 45. 1595. 2116.
4035 BOURBON 462. 38. 1652. 2151.
4036 BINLE 675. 174. 2073. 2922.
4037 BREATHIT 158. 2. 387. 547.
4038 BULL1T 621. 0. 779. 1400.
4039 CALDWELL 391. 103. 1471. 1964.
4040 CALLOWAY 644. 65. 1974. 2683.
4041 CARROLL 245. 81. 674. 1000.
4042 CARTER 337. 0. 883. 1221.
4043 CASEY 235. 17. 675. 927.
4044 CHRISTIA 1323. 159. 4226. 5108.
4045 CLARK 703. 131. 2089. 2923,
4046 CLAY 182. 3. 608. 793.
4067 CLINTON 110. 0. 391. 507.
4048 CRITTEND 162. 0. 509. 671.
4049 CW48ERLA 106. 9. 353. 469.
4050 EDMONSON 142. 45. 265. 452.
4051 ELLIOT 70. 42. 128. 241.
— 4052 ESTILL 231. 29. 479. 739.
4053 FLEMING 198. 0. 908. 1106.
4054 FLOYD 601. 36. 1177. 1812.
4055 FRANKLIN 1165. 977. 2560. 4703.
4056 FULTON 174. 39. 999. 1211.
4057 GARRARL) 181. 0. 737. 924.
4058 GRANT 208. 0. 783. 992.
4059 GRAVES 797. 845. 2388. 4029.
4060 GRAYSON 288. 59. 997. 1344.
4061 GREENUP 533. 68. 1770. 2370.
6062 HANCOCK 245. 0. 394. 639.
4063 HARDIN 2146. 499. 4100. 6745.
4064 HARLIN 603. 103. 1520. 2225.
4065 HARRISON 330. 220. 1241. 1791.
4066 HART 234. 40. 953. 1228.
4067 HENRY 239. 43. 805. 1088.
4068 HiCKMAN 125. 67. 598. 791.
4069 HOPKINS 886. Ii i. 2392. 3395.
4070 JACKSON 119. 5. 272. 395.
4071 JESSAMIN 406. 0. 961. 1367.
4072 JOHNSON 280. 16. 716. 1012.
4073 KNOTT 182. 2. 237. 621.
074 KNOX 353. 102. 671. fl26.
4015 LARNE 219. 31. 696. 946.
4076 LAUREL 462. 112. 1306. 1819.
4077 IMIRENCE 118. 23. 362. 563.
4078 LEE 82. 3. 240. 325.
-------
TABLE 24C: NA1LJRAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY IN BILLIONS OF BTLJS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
4079 LESlIE 127. 2. 221. 350.
4080 LETCHER 344. 0. 793. 1138.
4081 LINCOLN 289. 0. 873. 1163.
4082 LOGAN 503. 462. 1827. 2792.
4083 LYON 124. 0. 224. 348.
4084 HCCRACKE 1694. 1078. 5370. 8141.
4085 MCCREARY 145. 24. 346. 516.
4086 MADISON 981. 408. 2919. 4308.
4087 MAGOFFIN 125. 45. 213. 384.
4088 MARION 297. 136. 1173. 1606.
4089 MARTIN 111. 0. i69. 280.
4090 MENIFEE 62. 0. 140. 202.
4091 MERCER 415. 214. 1304. 1933.
4092 METCALFE 121. 4. 496. 622.
4093 MONROE 184. 65. 11?. 966.
4094 MONTGOME 353. 315. 1348. 2015.
4095 MORGAN 128. 19. 379. 525.
4096 MUHLENBE 597. 60. 1477. 2134.
4097 NELSON 506. 434. 1655. 2595.
4098 NICHOLAS 92. 0. 308. 400.
4099 OHIO 386. 88. 1032. 1506.
4100 OLOHAM 351. 0. 833. 1183.
4101 OWSLEY 50. 0. 94. 144.
4102 PENDLETO 201. 41. 565. 808.
4103 PERRY 352. 43. 1255. 1651.
4104 PIKE 1806. 64. 417. 2268.
4105 POWELL 141. 8. 216. 366.
4106 PULASKI 696. 278. 2268. 3242.
4107 ROBERISO 36. 0. 112. 14 .
4108 R0CKC ST 184. 6. 493. 684.
4109 R(MAN 309. 88. * 11. 1208.
4110 SHELBY 432. 190. 2003. 262 .
4111 SIMPSON 602. 406. 1321. 2129.
4112 SPENCER 94. 0. 442. 536.
4113 TAYLOR 355. 0. 1191. 1545.
4114 TODD 199. 6 ’ . 881. 1150.
4115 WARREN 1476. 1017. 4749. 7303.
4116 WASHINGT 195. 79. 780. 1053.
4117 WAYNE 180. 58. 700. 938.
4118 WHIILEY 325. 57. 1513. 1895.
4119 WOLFE 36. 0. 249. 285.
4120 W000FORD 458. 589. 1398. 2444.
SUBTOTAL 35844. 10933. 101653. 148429.
ORBES—TOTAL 121652. 35713. 174595. 331963.
STATE—TOJAL 121652. 35713. 176595. 331963.
-------
APPENDIX E
OHIO
;ources for Tables
No. 111-B —
1 U.S. Federal Power Coninission, Typical Electric Bills,
1974.
3 Drysdale, Frank R., and Calef, Charles E., The Ener-
etics of the United States of America: An Atlas ,
(Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1976). Residential,
comercial and industrial consumption was determined
with the help of use factors as given in Eqs. (1),
(2), and (3) in the text and related discussion.
4 Ibid .
5 U.S. Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book,
1972 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973).
17 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8—16 applied
to prices in Table 1 11—B—I. Prices are in 1974 dol-
lars.
18 Growth rates for 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to prices in Table 111-8—1. Prices are in 1974 dol-
lars.
21 Growth rates for 1975—85 from Table 111-8—16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
22 Growth rates for 1975-2000 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-3.
23 Growth rates for 1975-85 from Table 111-8-16 applied
to quantities in Table 111-8-4.
24 Growth rates in 1975-2000 from Table 111-8—16 applied
to quantities in Table III-B-4.
111-8-183
-------
TA8LE 1A: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ut
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
( )UNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
t/?5OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH
1001 ATHENS 9.20 3.7 51.45 . .ki
1002 BELMONT 8.30 3.3 51.45 3.8 2112. 1.8
1003 BROWN 8.60 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1004 BUTLER 8.55 3.4 56.40 3.8 2014. 1.7
1005 CLARK 9.36 3.1 57.38 3.8 2078. 1.7
1006 CIERMONT 9.10 3.6 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1007 FRANKLIN 8.52 3.4 52.06 3.5 2188. 1.8
1008 GALLIA 9.60 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1009 HAMILTON 8.71 3.5 62.60 4.2 2251. 1.9
1010 LAWRENCE 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8
1011 MAHONING 8.52 3.4 57.99 3.9 8. 1.i
1012 MEIGS 9.43 3.8 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1013 MIAMI 9.20 3.7 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1014 MONROE 9.50 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1015 MONTGOME 9.49 3.8 61.96 4.1 2432. 2.0
1016 MORGAN 8.68 3.5 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1017 MUSKINGA 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1010 PICKAWAY 9.20 3.7 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1019 PIKE 9.60 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1020 ROSS 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1021 scroro 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1022 WARREN 8.87 3.5 57.45 3.8 217?. 1.8
1023 WASHINGT 8.68 3.5 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
-------
TABLE 1B: ELFCIRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDINTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH S/1?0,000KWH C/KWH
1024 ALLEN 8.54 3.4 54.50 3.6 2205. 1.8
1025 DELAWARE 9.20 3.7 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1026 GEAUGA 8.28 3.3 51.65 3.8 2172. 1.8
102? GREENE 9.67 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1028 JEFFERSO 8.54 3.4 57.45 - 3,8 2172. 1.8
1029 MEDINA 8.63 3.5 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1030 PORTAGE 9.04 3.6 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1031 PREBLE 9.48 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1032 RICHLAND 8.16 3.3 51.38 3.8 2078. 1.7
1033 STARK 8.68 3.5 54.50 3.6 2205. 1.6
1034 SUMMIT 9.09 3.6 57.99 3.9 2078. 1.7
1035 TRUMBULL 8.47 3.4 57.38 1.9 2078. 1.7
-------
TABLE IC; ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1914 IN ALL OTHER ORB LLJUN1 ita
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
rfl TV NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUS1RIAL
WH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/U0,000KW’-i C/KW14
1036 ADAMS 8.52 3.4 i.45
1037 ASHLAND 8.80 3.5 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1038 ASHTABUL 8.28 3.3 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1039 AUGLAIZE 7.64 3.1 57.45 3.8 2 72. 1.8
1040 CARROLL 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1041 CHANPAIG 8.52 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1042 CLINTON 8.64 3 ,5 57,45 3.8 2 12. 1.8
1043 COLUMBTA 8.45 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1044 COSHOCTO 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1045 CRAWFORD 8.06 3.2 57.45 3.8 2112. .8
1046 DARKE 9.48 3.8 57.65 3.8 2172. 1.9
1067 FAIRFIEL 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 2 j 72 •
1048 FAYETTE 9.48 3.8 57.45 3.8 2 12. .8
1049 GUERNSEY 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 172. 1.8
1050 HAROIN 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 ;.72, 1.8
1051 HARRISON 8.54 3.4 57.45 3.8 .112. 1.8
1052 HIGHLAND 9.39 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1053 HOCKING 8.54 3.4 57.45 3,8 2172.
— 1054 HOLMES 8.54 3.4 5 .45 3.8 2172. .8
1055 JACKSON 7.40 3.0 5,.45 3.8 2 72. 1.8
172.
1056 KNOX 8.54 .4 57.45 3.8 2
1057 LICKING 8.70 ,.5 57.45 3.8 1 .8
—j 1058 LOGAN 9.48 3.8 57.45 3.8 — 2. .8
1059 MADISON 9.20 3.7 57.45 3.8 2112. 1.8
1060 MARION 8.40 3,4 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1061 MERCER 9.04 3.6 57.45 3.8 2t1 2 . .8
1062 MORROW 7.80 3.1 57.45 3.8 2q72. 1.8
1063 NOBLE 8.52 3.4 57.45 3.8 2 72. 1.8
1064 PERRY 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 2 12. 1.8
1065 SHELBY 9.48 3.8 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1066 TUSCAWAR 8.41 3.4 57.45 3.8 2112. 1.8
1067 UNION 9.48 3.8 57.45 3.8 2112. 1.8
1068 VDITON 8.52 3.4 57.45 3.8 2 72.
1069 WAYNE 8.01 3.2 57.45 3.8 2172. r 8
1010 WYANDOT 1.90 3.2 57.45 3.8 2 72. .8
-------
IABLE 10: ELkCTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIFS
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/KWH $/150 0KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
1071. CUVAHOGA 8.28 3.3 55.18 3.7 2386. 2.0
1072 DEFIANCE 8.75 3.5 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1073 ERIE 8.93 3.6 57.45 3.8 2172, 1.8
1074 FULTON 8.95 3.6 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1075 HANCOCK 8.54 3.4 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1016 HENRY 8.98 3.6 57.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1077 HURON 8.98 3.6 51.45 3,8 2172. 1.8
1078 LAKE 8.28 3.3 51.45 3.8 2172. 1.8
1079 LORAIN 8.1.3 3.3 57.38 3.8 2018.
1080 LUCAS 8.9 3.6 54.65 3.6 2112. 1.8
1081 OTTAWA 8.10 3.2 54.45 3.6 2172. 1.8
1082 PAULDING 8.54 3.4 54.45 3.6 217?. l.A
1083 PUTNAM 8.54 3.4 54.45 3.6 2112. 1.8
1084 SANDUSKY 8.81 3.5 54.45 3.6 2172. 1.8
1085 SENECA 8.54 3.4 54.45 3.6 2172. 1.8
1086 VANWERI 8.54 3.4 54•45 3.6 2172. 1.8
1087 WILLIAMS 7.73 3.1 54.45 3.6 2172.
1088 WOOD 8.46 3.4 54.45 3.6 2i12. 1.8
-------
TABLE 3M ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERA
1,000MWH 1,000MWH l,0 00MWH l,00 0HWH l,000MWH
1001 ATHENS 72. 20. 132. 223. 1615.
1002 BELMONT 125. 35. 212. 372. 2815.
i003 BROWN 28. 3. b6. 97. 0.
1004 BUTLER 570. 457. 910. 1937. 373.
1005 CLARK 340. 213. 648. 1201. 218.
i006 CLERMONT 131. 5. 189. 325. 6788.
1007 FRANKLIN 1820. 878. 3349. 6054. 285.
1008 GALLIA 17. 1. 62. 80. 6183.
1009 HAMILTON 2636. 2658. 4806. 10100. 3U1 .
1010 LAWRENCE 98. 74. 181. 353. u.
1911 MAHONING 706. 504. 1 ?1. 2481. 0.
1u12 NEIGS 11. 23. 28. 62. 0.
1013 MIAMI 247. 73. 469. 789. 0.
10i4 MONROE 16. 0. 25. 41. 0.
1015 MONTGONE 1866. 1830. 3212. 6908. 4253.
10J6 MORGAN 20. 12. 36. 67. 0.
1017 MUSKINGA 130. 77. 283. 490. 2171.
01B PICKAWAY 73. 67. 176. 317. 842.
i019 PIKE 16. 0. 34. 50. u.
1020 ROSS 121. 66. 290. 0.
1021 SCIOTO 111. 60. 267. 4,9. 0.
1022 WARREN 141. 17. 1 • 333. 0.
1023 WASHINGT lIb. 106. 33. 455. 0.
SUBTOTAL 9419. 7179. 17052. 33651. 28652.
-------
TABLE 38: ELECTRICITY CflNSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
1, 0 00MWH 1,000MWH 1,0 0 0MWH 1,000MWH 1,0 00MWI4
1024 ALLEN 254. 238. 592. 1084. 128.
1025 DELAWARE 92. 56. 150. 298. 0.
1026 GEAUGA 159. 47. 139. 345. 0.
1027 GREENE 237. 32. 310. 579. 0.
1028 JEFFERSO 217. 189. 391. 791. 17369.
1029 MEDINA 168. 51. 235. 454. 0.
1030 PORTAGE 269. 107. 35C. 726. 0.
1034 PREBLE 52. 12. 112. 175. 0.
1032 RICHIAND 357. 446. h82. 1485. 0.
1033 STARK 979. 962. 1801. 3741. 0.
1034 SUMMIT 1156. 2-53. 1929. 5539. 465.
1035 TRIJP4B(JLL 123. 911. 1126. 2766. 1229,
SUBTOTAL 4664. 5508. 7822. 17Q94. 19l91.
-------
TABLE 3Cz ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 TN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNtIES
TN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERAU.U
1, 000MWH 1,0 00MWH I,00 0MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH
1036 ADAMS 15. 1. 44. 60. 790.
1037 ASHLAND 89. 64. 191. 344. 0.
1038 ASHTABUL 219. 171. 416. 806. 2081.
p039 AUGLAIZE 75. 66. 201. 341. 0.
1040 CARROLL 32. 10. 56. 98. 0.
1041 CHAMPAIG 59. 44. 149. 252. 0.
1042 CLINTON 50. 34. 162. 247. 0.
1043 COLUMBIA 198. 103. 388. 689. 0.
1044 COSHOCTO 70. 72. 151. 293. 2874.
1045 CRAWFORD 124. 156. 274. 554. 0.
1046 DARKE 68. 22. 201. 292. 0.
1047 FAIRFIEL 150. 111. 286. 547. 0.
1048 FAYETTE 39. 30. 141. 210. 0.
1049 GUERNSEY 69. 50. 123. 241. 0.
1050 HARDIN 58. 57. 145. 259. 0,
1051 HARRISON 22. 4. 36. 62. 0.
1052 HIGHLAND 33. 11. 109. 153. 0.
1053 HOCKING 35. 29. 76. J40. 0.
— 1054 HOLMES 24. 9. 71. 104. 0,
1055 JACKSON 37. 22. 83. 143. 0.
1056 KNOX 82. 69. 196. 347. 0.
‘ 1057 LICKING 232. 193. 470. 896. 0.
- 1058 LOGAN 52. 26. 148. 226. 0.
1059 MADISON 35. 10. 112. 156. 0.
1060 MARION 147. 180. 350. 677. 0,
1061 MERCER 34, 53. 230. 317. 0.
1062 MORROW 34. 13. 61. 108. 0.
1063 NOBLE 2. 0. 26. 28. 0.
1064 PERRY 33. 7. 50. 90. 0.
1065 SHELBY 85. 96. 186. 367. 0.
1066 TUSCAWAR 149. 135. 337. 621. 0,
1067 UNION 49. 43. 127. 219. 0.
1068 VINTON 10. 1. 16. 27. 0.
1069 WAYNE 189. 147. 391. 727. 0.
1070 WYANDOT 30. 15. 101. 145. 0.
SUBTOTAL 2628. 2054. 6104. 10786. 5745.
ORBES—TOTAL 16711. 14741. 30978. 62431. 53588.
-------
TABLE 3D: ELECTRiCITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMFRCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL GENERATED
I,0 00MWH l,0 00MWH l,00 0P4WH 1, 0 0 0MWH l,0 00MWI-1
1011 CUYAHIJGA 5225. 3600. 8727. 17552. 3465.
1072 DEFIANCE 85. 114. 224. 423. 0.
1013 ERIE. 187. 163. 361. 11. C.
1014 FULTON 56. 43. 204. 303. 0.
1015 HANCOCK 119. 54. 279. 452. 0.
1076 HENRY 64. 88. 179. 331. 0.
1017 HURON 101. 84. 238. 423. 0.
j078 LAKE 490. 253. 734. 1471. 408?.
i019 LORAIN 655. 571. 1071. 2297. 5059.
1080 LUCAS 1258. 908. 2281. 444?. 4277.
1081 OTTAWA 6I . 37. 146. 251. 0.
1082 PAULDING 29. 14. 12. 1 1 5. 0.
1083 PUTNAM 52. 50. 164. 266. 0.
1084 SANDUSKY 136. 140. 303. 579, 0.
1085 SENECA 135. 112. 322. 630. 0.
1086 VANWERT 55. 47. 153. 255. C.
1087 WILLIAMS 67. 58. 181. 306. 0.
1088 WOOD 200. 124. 393. 717. 0.
SUBTOTAL 8982. 6519. 16035. 31535. 16888.
STATE—TOTAL 25693. 21260. 47013. 93966. 70416.
-------
TABLE 4A: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
TN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1001 ATHENS 1583. 259. 1241. 3083.
1002 BELMONT 2701. 453. 1958. 5112.
1003 BROWN 730. 51. 732. 1513.
1004 BUTLER 9556. 4580. 6487. 20623.
1005 CLARK 6330. 2366. 5127. 13823.
1006 CLERMONT 3350. 84. 2052. 5486.
1007 FRANKLIN 35935. 10324. 28008. 74267.
1008 GALLIA 495. 23. 767. 1285.
1009 HAMILTON 46937. 28314. 36406. 111656.
1010 LAWRENCE 1725. 780. 1351. 3856.
1011 MAHONING 12523. 5354. 9595. 27472.
1012 MEIGS 305. 368. 312. 986.
1013 MIAMI 4200. 148. 3396. 8344.
1014 MONROE 428. 0. 291. 719.
1015 MONTGOME 30332. 17804. 22215. 70351,
1016 MORGAN 365. 129. 284. 777,
1017 MUSKINGA 2517. 900. 2341. 5757,
1018 PTCKAWAY 1308. 716. 1335. 3359.
1019 PIKE 463. 0. 400. 863.
1020 ROSS 2159. 701. 2201. 5061,
1021 SCIOTO 2267. 136. 2311. 5314.
WARREN 3259. 230. 1713. 5202.
3 WASHINGT 1973. 1083. 1692. 4748.
-J
SUBTOTAL 171438. 16001. 132216. 379657.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1024 ALLEN
1025 DELAWARE
1026 GEAUGA
102? GREENE
1028 JEFFERSO
1029 MEDINA
1030 PmTAGE
1031 PREBLE
1032 RICHIAND
1033 STARK
1034 SIJIMIT
1035 TRUMBULL
SUBTOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
4452.
1665.
2990.
5440.
3652.
3435.
5127.
1228.
5532.
16044.
19401.
10684.
79651.
TOTAL
11368.
3419.
4625.
8896.
8362.
6106.
9178.
2 13.
14156.
3 081.
578 13.
25860.
190377.
TABLE 48: NA1URAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1914 IN OTHER OR8ES SMSA COtftITIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
2498. 4418.
605. 1149.
524. 1112.
43?. 3019.
1906. 2805.
623. 2048.
1219. 2833.
163. 1122.
4132. 4491.
9434. 12603.
24638. 13774.
8101. 7075.
54279. 56447.
-------
TABLE 4C: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BILlS
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1036 ADAMS 406. 24. 518. 948.
1037 ASHLAND 1639. 708. 1500. 3847.
1038 ASHTABUL 3846. 1797. 3103. 8746.
1039 At LAIZE 1377. 726. 1576. 3680.
1040 CARROLL 688. 125. 507. 1320.
t041 CHAMPAIG 1122. 503. 1202. 2827.
1042 CLINTON 1042. 422. 1426. 2891.
1043 cOLUM8IA 3883. 1207. 3231. 8321.
1044 COSHOCTO 1172. 724. 1073. 2969.
1045 CRAWFORD 1973. 1492. 1860. 5325.
1046 DARKE 1621. 317. 2032. 3970.
1047 FAIRFIEL 2663. 1182. 2170. 6015.
1048 FAYETTE 804. 367. 1245. 2416.
j049 GUERNSEY 1211. 523. 923. 2657.
1050 HARDIN 1014. 598. 1083. ?69S.
1051 HARRISON 499. 59. 349. 907.
1052 HIGHLAND 807. 159. 1127. 2093.
1053 HOCKING 626. 308. 571. 1506.
1054 HOLMES 572. 122. 704. 1398.
a —. 1055 JACKSON 727. 261. 688. 4676.
1056 KNOX 1491. 751. 1512. 3754.
1057 LICKING 4066. 2026. 3501. 9593,
‘ ‘ 1058 LOGAN 1138. 332. 1367. 2837.
- 1059 MADISON 859. 144. 1181. 2185.
1060 MARION 2399. 1766. 2437. 6602.
1061 PIERCER 740. 686. 2124. 3550.
1062 MORROW 700. 160. 535. 1396,
1063 NOBLE 66. 0. 417. 483.
1064 PERRY 728. 91. 477. 1296.
1065 SHELBY 1391. 943. 1297. 3630.
1066 TUSCAWAR 2623. 1416. 2524. 6563.
1067 UNION 901. 468. 992. 2362.
1068 VINTON 231. 19. iS?. 408.
1069 WAYNE 3381. 1578. 2986. 7945.
1070 WYANDOT 667. 197. 969. 1833.
SUBTOTAL 49015. 22203. 49366. 120644.
ORBES—TOTAL 300163. 152482. 238028. 690678.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1071 CUYAHOGA
1012 DEFIANCE
1013 ERIE
1074 FULTON
1075 HANCOCK
1076 HENRY
1077 HLJUDN
1078 LAKF
1079 LORAIN
1080 LUCAS
1081 OTTAWA
1082 PAULDING
1083 PUTNAM
1084 SANDUSKY
1085 SENECA
1086 VANWERT
1087 WILLIAMS
1088 WOOD
SUBTOTAL
STATE—TOTAL
TABLE AD: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR j974 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
16483. 62889.
1116. 1560.
1665. 2630.
529. 1800.
683. 2503.
867. 1260.
915. 1835.
2798. 5769.
5630. 7514.
9945. 17757.
438. 1233.
171. 653.
562. 1314.
1416. 2115.
1669. 2223.
527. 1226.
647. 1435.
1389. 3142.
67456. 118920.
219938. 356948.
TOTAL
187869.
4064.
1493.
3499.
5690.
3179.
4573.
17623.
23935.
50725.
3024.
1438.
2849.
5891.
6088.
7795.
3321.
8297.
142353,
1033031.
COUNTIES
RESIDENTIAL
8849?.
1388.
3197.
1110.
2504.
1053.
1822.
9056.
10792.
23023.
1353.
609.
972.
2299.
2195.
1042.
1239.
3765.
155976.
456139.
-------
TABLE 5A; OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTIFS
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME P R TA POPULATION Pç i SHI ENTS MXAbFACTL !NG ? L WHOL t
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
1001 ATHENS 2292. 54889. 126. 2. 21. 62. 7%.
j002 BELMONT 2628. 80917. 213. 6. 46. 95. 35.
1003 BROWN 2287. 266i . 61. 12. 6. 28. 10.
i004 BUTLER 3108. 226207. 703. 13. 436. 300. 374.
1905 CLARK 3018. 156946. 483. 22. 234. 234. 103.
06 CLERMONT 2814. 95725. 269. 6. 9. 102. 26.
j007 FRANKLIN 3333. 833249. 2777. 13. 1033. 1q06. 2045.
i008 GALLIA 2077. 25239. 52. 4. 3. 49. 13.
1009 HAMILTON 3389. 924018. 3131. 6. 24 5. 1587. 5080.
1010 LAWRENCE 2275. 56868. 129. 3. r6. 64.
1011 MAHONING 3101. 303424. 941. 8. 521. 464. 6u7,
1012 MEIGS 201u. 19799. 40. 4. 62. 23. 7.
1043 MIAMI 3174. 84342. 268. 22. 62. 120. 60.
1014 MONROE 2222. 15739. 35. 3. 0. 13. 2.
1015 MONTGOME 3624. 60 148. 2197. 13. 1669. 1042. 1290.
10J6 MORGAN 2247. jc375. 20. 2. 13. 12. 3.
tOil MUSKINGA 2513. ,7826. 196. 8. 1’ 112. 101.
4018 P4CKAWAY 2482. 40071. 99. 24. ii. 43. 18.
i i019 PiKE 2029. 19114. 39. 4. 0. J8. 6.
1020 ROSS 2328. 76951. 79. 5. 75. 115.
i 1021 SCIOTO 2328. 76951. 179. 5. 75. uS. 5 .
1022 WARREN 3003. 84925. 255. 12. 23. 76. 24.
- i023 WASHINGT 2573. 57160. 147. 5. 105. 78. 45.
SUBTOTAL 3955518. 12547. 202. 7079. 6158, 10034.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031.
1.032
1033
1034
1035
PERCAPI TA
INCOME
(DOLLARS)
3030.
2918.
3517.
3412.
2809.
3197.
3075.
2878.
306b.
3165.
3439.
3241.
ALLEN
DELAWARE
GEAUGA
GREENE
JE F F ER SO
MED I N A
PORTAGE
PREBLE
RICHIAND
STARK
S (JIM I T
TRUMBULL
SUB TOTAL
TABLE 58: OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR
IN THF STATE OF OHIO
1974 IN OTHER
ORBES SMSA
COUNTIES
POPULATION PERSONAL
INCOME
(MILLIONS)
FARM
SHIPMENTS
(MILLIONS)
VALUE ADDE!)
MANUFACTURING
(MILLIONS)
RETAIL
SALES
(MILLIONS)
WHOLESALE
SALES
(MILLIONS)
111144. 337.
42908. 125.
62977. 221.
I25u57. 427.
96193. 270.
82111. 264.
125861 . 381.
34719. 100.
129991. 399.
372210. 1170.
553371. 1903.
232579. 154.
16.
1.2.
5.
20.
2.
ii.
10.
21.
i i.
17.
9.
1.
245.
59.
50.
44.
182.
62.
119.
17.
386.
h97.
3120.
740.
203.
45.
49.
136.
134.
93.
130.
39.
201.
590.
876.
320.
252.
21.
14.
73.
63.
63.
37,
21.
109.
411.
1669.
238.
1969140. 6365.
141.
5029.
2816.
3036.
‘-4
-4
-------
TABLE SC; OTHER ECONOMIC VARIABLES FOR YEAR 1974 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIES
IN IHE S1A1 OF UHit
COUNTY NAME P RcAPITA POPULATION PER ONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHOLESALE
NOML. IN ..OME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS)
1036 ADAMS 1841. 18957. 35. 9. 3. 21. 4.
1037 ASH ( AND 2897. 43303. 125. 14. 70. 62. 25.
038 ASH ABUL 2938. 98231. 289. 13. 176. 140. 38.
1039 AUGLAIZE 2759. 38602. 107. 21. 73. 58. 46.
1040 CARROLL 2506. 21579. 54. 5. 13. 21. 5.
t04 HAMPAIG 2859. 30491. 87. 22. 51. 40. 0.
04 UNION 2672. 31464. 84. 20. 44. 55. 37.
1043 COLUMBIA 2777. 108310. 301. 13. 121. 151. 47.
1044 COSHOCTO 2601. 33486. 87. 9. 70. 43. 22.
CRAWFORD 2867. 50364. 144. 17. 141. 72. 38.
046 DARKE 2741. 49141. 135. 38. 34, 72. 67.
1041 FAIRFIEL 2740. 73301. 201. 17. 115. 91. 60.
104fi FAYETTE 2563. 25461. 65. 21. 39. 45. 34.
1049 GUERNSEY 2412. 37665. 91. 4. 51. 42. 13.
1050 HARDIN 2500. 30813. 77. 19. 59. 35. 33.
051 HARRISON 2329. 170 3. ..0. 3. 6. 15. 7.
1052 HIGHLAND 2340. 28996. 68. 18. 11. 44. 24.
1053 HOCKING 2333. 20322. 47. 1. 30. 27. 8.
H%MES 2053. 23024. 47. 18. 13. 24. 13.
JA KSON 2083. 27174. 57. 3. 26. 3z. 12.
1056 KNOX 2729. 41795. 114. 14. 14. 62. 18.
—J 1057 LICKING 2836. 107799. 306. 16. 197. 156. 35.
1058 LOGAN 2631. 35072. 92. 16. 35. 57. 113.
1059 MADISON 2564. 28318. 73. 3. 16. 43. 22.
1060 MARION 2743. 64724. 178. 18. 169. 101. 57.
1061 MERCER 2595. 19799. 51. 35. 62. 62. 44.
1062 MORROW 2562. 21348. 55. 10. 16. 17. 4.
1063 NOBLE 2110. 10428. 23. 2. 0. 92. 1.
1064 PERRY 2089. 27434. 51. 4. 9. 21. 4,
065 SHE BY 2721. 31748. 103. 20. 90. 43. 32.
066 11.1 5 AWAR 2569. 77211. 198. 12. 139. 113. 62.
067 UNION 2921. 23786. 69. 17. 41. 33. 7.
106 VINTON 1960. 9420. J 8 . 2. 2. 7. 0.
1069 WAYNE 2941. 87123. 2 6. 34. 155. 115. 66,.
1070 WYANDOT 2533. 21826. 55. 15. 21. 37. 12.
SUBTOTAL 1421534. 3789. 521. 2182. 2045. 1012.
ORBES—TOTAL 7346792. 22702. 864. 15190. 11018. 14082.
-------
TABLE SD: OTHER ECONOMIC VAR1AB1E FOR YEA 1974 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME PERCAPITA POPULATION PERSONAL FARM VALUE ADDED RETAIL WHflLESALE
INCOME INCOME SHIPMENTS MANUFACTURING SALES SALES
(DOLLARS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) IMTLLTONS) (MILLIONS)
loll CUYAHOGA 3692. 1721300. 6355. 9. 3391, 2952. 7488.
1072 DEFIANCE 2788. 369 4g. 103. 12. 107. 64. 39.
1073 ERIE 3140. 15909. 238. 9. 161. 120. °9.
1074 FULTON 2871. 33071. 95. 35. 56. 61. 76.
1075 HANCOCK 3259. 61211. 200. 23. 70. 101. 26.
1076 HENRY 2902. 27058. 19. 25. 84. 36. 66.
1017 HURON 2810. 49587. 139. 17. 91. 75. 39.
1078 LAKE 3462. 197200. 683. 10. 273. 275. 86.
1079 LORAIN 3078. 256843. 791. 16. 534. 345. 87.
1080 LUCAS 3408. 494370. 1685. 12. Q42, 840. 1230.
1081 OTTAWA 2847. 31099. 106. 9. 44. 54. 24.
1082 PAULDING 2519. 19329. 49. 12. 18. 22. 14.
1083 PUTNAM 2446. 31134. 76. 30. 57. 38. 21.
1084 SANDIJSKY 2813. 60983. 172. 21. 137. 86. ‘.1.
1085 SeJECA 2661. 60696. 162. 20. 159. 87, 78.
1086 VANWERT 2778. 29194. Ri. 17. 53. 45. 43.
1087 WILLIAMS 2851. 33669. 96. 18. 65. 5 ! ). 47.
1088 WOOD 3216. 89722. 289. £7. 138. 130. 60.
SUBTOTAL 3315330. 11396. 324. 6379. 5392. 9651.
STATE—TOTAL 10662122. 34098. 1188. 21569. 16410. 23733.
cD
-------
TABLE 17*; ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLANT COUNTiES
THE STAff OF
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH c/KWH S/15 0 0KWH C/KWH t/120,000KWH C/KWH
1001 ATHENS 9.80 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1002 BELMONT 8.84 3.5 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1003 BROWN 9.16 3.7 61.18 4.1 3089. 2,6
1004 BUTLER 9.11 3.6 60.07 4.0 2864. 2.4
1005 CLARK 9.97 4.0 61.11 4.1 2955. 2.5
1006 CLERMONT 9.69 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1007 FRANi(LIN 9.07 3.6 55.44 3.7 3111. 2.6
1008 GALLIA 10.22 4.1 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1009 HAMILTON 9.28 3.7 66.67 4.4 3201. 2.7
1010 LAWRENCE 9.10 3.6 61.16 4.1 3089. 2.6
1011 NAHONING 9.07 3.6 61.76 4.1 2955, 2.5
1012 MUGS 10.04 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1013 MIAMI 9.80 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1014 MONROE 10.12 4.0 61.48 4.1 3089. 2.6
1015 MONTGOME 10.11 4.0 65.99 4.4 3458. 2.9
1016 MORGAN 9.24 3.1 61.18 4.1 3069. 2.6
1017 MUSKINGA 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.J 3089. 2.6
1018 PICKAWAY 9.80 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1019 PIKE 10.22 4.1 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1020 Rf S 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.4 3089. 2.6
1021 SCIOTO 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1022 WARREN 9.45 3.8 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1023 WASHINGT 9.24 3.7 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
-------
I ” )
cD
I ’ . )
TABLE 178: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL CDMMERCI*L INDUSTRIAL
$/250KWH C/KWH S/ I SOOKWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KWH C/KWH
1024 ALLEN 9.10 3.6 58.04 3.9 3136. 2.6
1025 DELAWARE 9.80 3.9 61.18 4.! 3089. 2.6
1026 GEAUGA 8.82 3.5 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1021 GREENE 10.09 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1028 JEFFERSO 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1029 MEDINA 9.19 3.1 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1030 PORTAGE 9.63 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1031 PREBLE 10.10 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1032 RTCHLAND 8.69 3.5 61.11 4.1 2955. 2.5
1033 STARK 9.24 3.7 58.04 3.9 3136. 2.6
1034 SUMMIT ‘ .68 3.9 61.76 4.1 2955. 2.5
1035 TRUMBULL 9.02 3.6 61.11 4.1 2955. 2.5
-------
CIF(1P.!C!TY PRTCFS FOR YEAR 1985 TN ALL OTHER ORBES CflUN11t
‘
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I SO OKWH C/KWH $/ 120,000KWH C/KWH
103.6 ADAMS 9.07 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1037 ASHLAND 9.37 3.7 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1038 ASHTABUL 8.82 3.5 4.1 3089. 2.6
1039 AUGLAIZE 8.14 3.3 64.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1040 CARROLL 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1041 CHAMPAIG 9.07 3.6 61.18 4. 3089. 2.6
1042 CLINTON 9.20 3.7 6L. .8 4.1 3089. 2.6
1043 COLUMBIA 9.00 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
COSHOCTO 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
CRAWFORD 8.58 3.4 6 ..18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1046 DARKE 10.10 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1047 FAIRFIEL 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1048 FAYETTE 10.10 4.0 61.18 6.1 3089. 2.6
1049 GUERNSEY 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 30$9. 2.6
1050 HARDIN 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.} 3089. 2.6
1051 HARRISON 9.10 3.6 6 ..8 6. 3089. 2.6
1052 HIGHLAND 10.00 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1053 HOCKING 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1054 HOLMES 9.10 3.6 61.18 4. 3089. 2.6
1055 JACKSON 7.o8 3.2 6 • 8 4. 3089. 2.6
‘ 1056 KNOX 9.10 3.6 61.10 4.1 3089. 2.6
1057 LICKING 9.27 3.7 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
‘ 1058 LOGAN 10.10 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1059 MADISON 9.80 3.9 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1060 MARION 8.95 3.6 6&.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1061 MERCER 9.63 3.9 61. .8 4.1 3089. 2.6
1062 MORROW 8.31 3.3 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1063 NOBLE 9.07 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1064 PERRY 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1065 SHELBY 10.10 4.0 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1066 TUSCAWAR 8.96 3.6 61.&8 4.1 3089. 2.6
1067 UNION 10.10 4.0 6 .18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1068 VINTON 9.01 3.6 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1069 WAYNE 8.53 3.4 61.48 4.1 3089. 2.6
1070 WYANDOT 8.41 3.4 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
-------
TABLE liii: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THU STATE OF OHiO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
t/25OKWH C/KWH $/150 0KWH C/KWH $/l2O,OO0KW C/KWH
lOll CUYAHOGA 8.82 3.5 58.77 3.9 3393. 2.8
1072 DEFIANCE 9.32 3.1 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1073 ERIE 9. t 3.C 61.18 3069. 2.6
1074 FULTON 9.53 3.8 61.18 4.1 30R9. 2.6
1075 HANCOCK 9.10 3.6 61.18 4.1 3069. 2.6
1076 HENRY 9.56 3.8 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1077 HUKON 9.56 3.8 61.16 4.1 3089. 2.6
1078 LAKE 8.82 3. 61.18 4.1 3089. 2.6
1019 LORAIN 8.66 .3.5 61.11 4.1 2955. 2.5
ICSO LUCAS 9.53 3.8 57.99 3.9 308Q. 2.6
1081 OTTAWA 8.63 3.5 57.99 3.9 3089. 2.6
1082 PAULOING 9.10 3.6 57.99 3.9 3089. 2.6
1083 PUTNAM 910 3.6 57.99 .9 3089. 2.6
1084 SANDUSKY 9.38 3.8 57.99 30 . 2.6
1085 SENECA 9.10 3.6 51.99 3.9 3069. 2.6
1086 VANWERT 9.10 3.6 57.99 3.9 3089. 2.6
1087 WILLIAMS 8.23 3.3 57.99 3.9 308Q. 2.6
1088 WOOD 9.01 3.6 57•99 3.9 3089. 2.6
-------
T RjF i8A: ELFCTR)CITY PRICES FOR YEAK iuuu ir ‘n’u r piu ,
IN THE SlATE UF O -i O
CO114TY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMI4ERCIkL INDUSTRIAL
$/250KWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH S/120,000KWH C/KWH
1001 ATHENS 8.08 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1002 BELMONT 7.29 2.9 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1003 BROWN 1.55 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1004 BUTLER 1.51 3.0 49.52 3.3 3571. 3.0
1005 CLARK 8.22 3.3 50.38 3.4 3684. 3.1
1006 CIERMONT 7.99 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
.007 FRANKLIN 1.48 3.0 45.71 3.0 3879. 3.2
1008 GALIIA p.43 3.4 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1009 HAMILTON 7.65 3.1 54.96 3.7 3991. 3.3
1010 LAWRENCE 1.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
loll MAHONING 7.48 3.0 50.92 3.4 3684. 3.1
1012 NEIGS 8.28 3.3 50.44 1.4 1851. 3.2
1013 MIAMI 8.08 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1014 MONROE 8.34 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1015 MmTGOME 8.33 3.3 54.40 3.6 4312. 3.6
1016 MORGAN 7.62 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1017 MUSKINGA 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1018 PICKAWAY 8.08 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1019 PIKE 8.43 3.4 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1020 ROSS 1.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851, 3.2
1021 SCIOTO 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1022 WARREN 1.19 3.1 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.?
1023 WASHINGI 1.62 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
-------
I-4
I ” )
TABLE 188: ELECTRICITY PRiCES FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMS? COUNTIES
TN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
S/25OKWH C/K dH $/ 1500KWI-I C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
1024 ALLEN 7.50 3.0 47.85 3.2 3909. 3.3
1025 DELAWARE 8.08 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1026 GEAUGA 7.27 2.9 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1027 GREENE 8.31 3.3 50.44 3.4 1851. 3.2
1026 JEFFERSO 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1029 MEOJNA 7.58 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1030 PORTAGE 7.94 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1031 PREBLE 8.32 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1032 RICHLANI) 7.16 2.0 50.38 3.4 3684. 3.1
1033 STARK 7.62 3.0 41.85 3.2 3909. 3.3
1034 SUMMIT 7.98 3.2 50.92 3.4 3684. 3.
1035 TRUMBULL 7.44 3.0 50.38 3,6 3684. 3.
-------
iac. ELECIRCITY FOR YF R 2 flO PJ iI OTHER ORBFS COUNTIFS
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDLNT!AL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/ I500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
1036 ADAMS 7.48 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1037 ASHLAND 7.73 3. 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1038 ASHTABUL 1.27 2.9 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1039 AUGLAIZE 6.71 2.? 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1040 CARROLL 1.50 3.0 50.44 3,4 3851. 3.2
1041 CHAMPAIG 7.48 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1042 CLINTON 7.59 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1043 COLUMBIA 7.42 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1044 COSHOCTO 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1045 CRAWFORD 7.08 2.8 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1046 DARKE 8.32 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1047 FAIRFIEL 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.?
1048 FAYETTE 8.32 3.3 50.44 3,4 3851. 3.2
1049 GUERNSEY 1.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1050 HAROIN 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1051 HAKRISON 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1052 HIGHLAND 8.24 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1053 HOCKING 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
— 1054 HOLMES 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1055 JACKSON 6.50 2.6 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1056 KNOX 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1057 LICKING 764 3.1 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1058 LOGAN 8.32 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1059 MADISON 8.08 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1060 MARION 1.38 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1061 MERCER 7.94 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1062 MORROW 6.85 2.7 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1063 NOBLE 7.48 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1064 PERRY 7.50 3.0 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1065 SHELBY 8.32 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1066 TUSCAWAR 7.38 3.0 50.44 3.4 3Q51. 3.2
1067 UNION 8.32 3.3 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1068 VINTON 7.48 3.0 50.64 3.6 3851. 3.2
1069 WAYNE 7.03 2.8 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1070 WYANDOT 6.94 2.8 50.44 3.4 3651. 3.2
-------
p— s
I -I
13
OD
TABLE 180: ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER COuNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
$/25OKWH C/KWH $/1500KWH C/KWH $/120,000KWH C/KWH
1071 CUYAIIOGA 1.27 2.9 48.45 3.2 4230. 3.5
1012 DEFIANCE 7.68 3.1 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1073 ERIE 7.44 3.1 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1074 FUITON 7.86 3.1 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1075 HANCOCK 1.50 3.0 50.46 3.4 3851. 3.2
1016 HENRY 1.88 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1077 HIJ ON 1.88 3.2 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1078 LAKE 1.27 2.9 50.44 3.4 3851. 3.2
1079 LORAIN 7.14 2.9 50.38 3.4 3684. 3.1
1080 LUCAS 1.86 3.1 47.81 3.2 3851. 3.2
1081 OTTAWA 7.11 2.8 47.81 3.2 3651. 3.2
1082 PAULDING 7.50 3.0 47.81 3.2 3851. 3.2
1083 PUTNAM 7.50 3.0 41.8) 3.2 3851. 3.2
1084 SANDUSKY 7.14 3.1 47.81 3.2 3851. 3.2
1085 SENECA 7.50 3.0 47.81 3.2 3851. 3.2
1086 VANWERT 1.50 3.0 47.81 3.2 3851. 3o2
1087 WILLIAMS 6.79 2.7 41.91 3.2 3851. 3.2
1088 WOOD 7.43 3.0 47.81 3.2 3851. 3.2
-------
TABLE 21A; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ORBES PLANT COW4IIES
TN THF STATF (]F
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1,0 00MWH 1, 00 0MWH 1,()OOMWH
1001 ATHENS 158. 31. 200. 390.
1002 BELMONT 275. 56. 323. 654.
1003 BROWN 62. 5. 100. 167.
1004 BUTLER 1260. 733. 1383. 3377,
1005 CLARK 752. 341. 985. 2078.
1006 CLERMONT 289. 287. 585.
1007 FRANKLIN 4040. 1409. 5090. 10538.
1008 GALLIA 37. 2. 94. 133.
1009 HAMILTON 5826. 4265. 7305. l7397,
1010 LAWRENCE 217. 119. 275. 611.
1011 MAHONING 1560. 809. 1932. 4301.
1012 MEIGS 25. 37. 42. 104.
1013 MIAMI 545. 118. 113. 1376.
1014 MONROE 35. 0, 3e, 73,
1015 MONTGOME 4124. 2937. 4882. 11943.
1016 MORGAN 43. 19. 54. 116.
1017 MUSKINGA 286. 124. 430. 841.
1018 PICKAWAY 162. 108. 268. 538,
1019 PIKE 36. 0. 51. 87.
1020 ROSS 268. 105. 441. 814,
1021 SCIOTO 246. 97• 406. 749,
1022 WARREN 313. 27. 266. 605.
1023 WASHINGT 256. 170. 356. 780.
SUBTOTAL 20817. 11523. 25920. 58259.
-------
I —4
—a
CD
TABL.E 218: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,0 00MWH 1,000MWH 1,000MWH 1,0 0 0MWH
1024 ALLEN 561. 382. 900. 1843.
1025 DELAWARE 204. 90. 227. 521.
1026 GEAUGA 352. 7 i. 212. 638.
1027 GREENE 525. 51. 471. 1047.
1028 JEFFERSO 479. 303. 595. 1377.
1029 MEDINA 371. 82. 358. 810.
1030 PORTAGE 595. 172. 532, 1298.
1031 PREBLE 115. 19. 170. 303,
1032 RICHIAND 790. 716. 1036. 2542.
1033 STARK 2j63. 1543. 2146. 6452.
1034 SUMMIT 2 55. 3937. 2932. 9424.
1035 TRUMBULL 1599. 1471. 1711. 4781,
SUBTOTAL 10301. 841. 11889.. 31037.
-------
TABLE 21C: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 14 ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTlIS
IN 11* SIAU
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDLJ TRIAL TQTA 1
1, 0 00NWH 1,00 0MWH I, Ou OMWH 1, OuOriWH
1036 ADAMS 32. 2. 61. lOl.
1037 ASHLAND 196. 103. 290. 590.
1038 ASHTABUL 484. 275. 632. 1391.
1039 AUGLAIZE 165. 106. 305. 575.
1040 CARROLL 71. 16. 85. 172.
1041 CHAMPAIG 130. 11. 226. 428.
1042 CLINTON 112. 55. 247. 413.
1043 COLUMBIA 438. 165. 589. 1193.
1044 COSHOCTO 155. 116. 229. 500.
1045 CRAWFORD 273. 251. 411. 941.
1046 DARKE 151. 36. 306. 493 ,
1047 FAIRFIEL 331. 178. 435. 944.
1048 FAYETTE 86. 48. 215. 349.
1049 GUERNSEY 152. 19. 187. 418.
1050 HARDIN 127. 91. 220. 438.
1051 HARRISON 48. 7. 54. 110.
1052 HIGHLAND 13. 18. 166. 256.
1053 HOCKING 78. 47. 115. 240.
— 1054 HOLMES 54. 14. 108. 176.
1055 JACKSON 83. 36. 126. 245.
1056 KNOX 181. 111. 298. 590.
‘ 1057 LICKING 513. 311. 1 15. 1539.
r’. 1058 LOGAN 116. 41. 225. 382.
1059 MADISON 76. 16. 170. 262.
1060 MARION 324. 289. 532. 1146.
1061 MERCER 75. 85. 350. 510.
1062 MORROW 75. 21. 93. 189.
1063 NOBLE 4. 0. 40. 44.
1064 PERRY 72. 11. 77. 160.
1065 S ELBY 188. 154. 283. 625.
1066 TUSCAWAR 330. 216. 511. 1058.
1067 UNION 109. 68. 193. 370.
1068 VINTUN 22. 2. 24. 48.
1069 WAYNE 417. 236. 595. 1268.
1070 WYANDOT 65. 23. 153. 242.
SUBTOTAL 5808. 329?. 9218. 18383.
ORBES—TOTAL 36932. 23660. 47087. 107618,
-------
TABLE 210: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL IMDU TRIAL TOTAL
I,000MWH I. , 000MWH l,00 0MWH 1, 00 0MWH
1071 CUVAHOGA 11547. 5777. 13266. 30590.
1072 DEFIANCE 188. 183. 341. 111.
1073 ERiE 413. 261. 549. 1224.
1074 FULTON 125. 68. 310. 503.
1075 HANCOCK 263. 87. 424. 776.
1016 hENRY 141. 141. 273. 555.
1077 HUPON 222. 135. 362. 720,
1078 LAKE 1083. 406. 1115.
1079 LORAIN 1447. 916. 1629. 3992.
1080 LUCAS 2780. 1458. 3467. 7705.
1081 OTTAWA 151. 59. 222. 432.
1082 PAULDING 63. 22. 110. 196.
1083 PUTNAM 114. 80. 250. 444.
1084 SANDUSKY 301. 225. 460. 986.
1085 SENECA 299. 276. 490. 1066,
1086 VANWERT 122. 75. 233. 430,
1087 WILLIAMS 147. 93. 276. 516.
1088 WOOD 443. 198. 597. 1239.
SUBTOTAL 19850. 10462. 24373. 54685.
STATE—TOTAL 56182. 34122. 71459. 162362,
N)
-------
TABLE 22A: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ORBLS LAN .uu *uic.
IN IHE STAlE OF Q I )
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,0 00MWH 1,000MWH 1,00 0MWH 1, 000MWH
1001 ATHENS 398. 51. 303. 752.
1002 BELMONT 692. 92. 489. 1272.
1003 BROwN 155. 9. 151. 315.
1004 BUTLER 3168. 1197. 2093. 6458.
1005 CLARK 1891. 557. 1490. 3938.
1006 CIERMONT 128. 14. 434. 1176.
1007 FRANKLIN 10154. 2299. 7702. 20155.
1008 GALLIA 94. 3. 142. 240.
1009 HAMILTON 14645. 6963. 11054. 32662.
1010 LAWRENCE 545. 194. 4]6. 1155.
1011 MAHONING 3920. 1321. 29 3. 8165.
1012 MEIGS 64. 60. 63. i87.
i013 MIAMI 1370. 192. 1078. 2641.
1014 MONROE 88. 0. fi8. 146.
1015 MONTGOME 10365. 4195. 7387. 22 48.
1016 MORGAN 109. 30. 8?. 222.
1017 MUSKINGA 719. 203. 651. 1573.
1018 PICKAWAY 408. 176. 405. 990.
1019 PIKE 92. 0. 77. 169.
1020 ROSS 673. 172. 667. 1512.
1021 SCIOTO 619. 158. 614. 1392.
1022 WARREN 786. 44. 402. 1232.
1023 WASHINGT 643. 278. 536. 1457.
SUBTOTAL 52325. 18809. 392?O. 110354.
-------
RESIDENTIAL
I ,000MWH
1410.
513.
885.
1319.
1204.
932.
1496.
289.
1985.
5436.
6421.
4019.
25908.
COMMERCIAL
1,00 0MWH
624.
147.
122.
84.
4.5.
‘33.
280.
30.
1168.
2519.
6427.
2402.
14432.
INDIJ TR IAL
1, 00DM WH
1362.
344.
320.
712.
900.
5’. 1.
804.
256.
1568.
4156.
4437.
2590.
17990.
TOTAL
1 ,A00MW -$
3396.
1004.
1321.
2115.
2599.
1601.
2581.
575.
4721.
121 Ii.
172R5.
0l0.
58330.
TABLE 22B: ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME
1024 ALLEN
1025 DELAWARE
1026 GEAUGA
1027 GREENE
1028 JEFFERSO
1029 MED1NA
1030 PORTAGE
1031 PRE8LE
1032 RICHLAND
1033 STARK
1034 SUMMIT
1035 TRUMBULL
SUBTOTAL
‘ -I
I—4
I-1
-J
-------
TARIF ?2C: FLECTF !CITY CONSUMPTH1N FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER ORBES COUNTIFS
TN THE STAlE OF UH U
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
l,000MWH I,0 0 0MWH I,000MWH 1, 0 0 0MWH
1036 ADAMS 81. 4. lOt. 186.
1037 ASHLAND 493. 168. 440. 1101.
1038 ASHTABUL 1218. 448. 956. 2622.
1039 AUGLAIZE 414. 172. 462. 1048.
1040 CARROLL 119. 26. 129. 334.
1041 CHAMPAIG 328. 116. 342. 786.
1042 CLINTON 280. O. 373. 743.
1043 COLUMBIA 1101. 270. 892. 2263.
1044 COSHOCTO 389. 190. 341. 925.
1045 CRAWFORD 687. 409. 630. 1727.
1046 DARKE 379. 58. 4 3 901.
1041 FAIRFIEL 831. 291. 659. 1781.
1048 FAYETTE 216. 18. 325. 619.
1049 GUERNSEY 381. 130. 283. 793.
1050 HARDIN 320. 149. 333. ROt.
1051 HARRISON 121. 11. 82. 215.
1052 HIGHLAND 184. 29. 251. 463.
1053 HOCKING 196. 76. 114. 446.
1054 HOLMES 136. 23. 163. 322.
1055 JACKSON 208. 59. 191. 458.
1056 KNOX 456. 181. 450. 1087.
‘ 1057 LICKING 1291. 507. 1081. 2879.
1058 LOGAN 291. 67. 340. 699.
- 1059 MADISON 192. 25. 251. 474.
°‘ 1060 MARION 815. 472. 805. 2092.
1061 MERCFR 189. 138. 529. 85?.
1062 MtPROW 189. 34. 140. 363.
1063 NOBLE 10. 0. 60. 70.
1064 PERRY 182. 18. 116. 316.
1065 SHELBY 412. 252. 428. 1151.
1066 TUSCAwAR 829. 353. 716. 1957.
1067 UNION 273. 112. 293. 677.
1068 VINTON 55. 4. 36. 95.
1069 WAYNE 1047. 385. 900. 2333.
1010 WYANDOT 164. 38. 232. 434.
SUBTOTAL 14598. 5382. 14039. 6019.
ORBES—TOIAL 92831. 38623. 11249. 202702.
-------
TABLE 220; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN All OTHER COUNTIES
IN THE SlATE OF OHIO
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1,000MWH 1,0 00MWH 1,00 0MWH 1, 0 0 0MWH
1011 CUYAHOGA 29025. 9431. 20073. 58529.
1012 DEFIANCE 471. 299. 516. 1286.
1073 ERIE 1038. 426. 831. 2296.
1014 FULTON 313. 112. 469. 894.
1015 HANCOCK 660. 142. 642. 1444.
1076 HENRY 354. 230. 413. 997.
1017 HI ON 559. 221. 548. 1327.
1078 LAKE 2123. 663. 1688. 5073.
1079 IORAIN 3631. 1495. 2464. 7597.
1080 LUCAS 6989. 2379. 5246. 14614.
ioai OTTAWA 379. 97. 336. 811.
1082 PAULD NG 159. 36. 166. 362.,
1083 PUTNAM 287. 131. 378. 796.
1084 SANDUSKY 756. 367. 696. 1820.
1085 SENECA 152. 451. 142. 19L5.
1086 VANWERT 307. 122. 352. 781.
1087 WILLIAMS 370. 152. 411. .39.
1088 WOOD 1113. 324. 904. 2341.
SUBTOTAL 49894. 11079. 36880. 103852.
o STATE—TOTAL 142724. 55701. 108128. 306554.
-------
TUE. AL CAS COSJMP flN FOR YEAR I 85 IN ORBES PLAN! uur z
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN b1LLiu S
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1001 ATHENS 1387. 326. 1598. 3311.
1002 BELMONT 2366. 511. 2522. 5659.
1003 BROWN 639. 64. 943. 1647.
1004 BUTLER 8371. 5770. 8355. 22447.
1005 CLARK 5545. 2981. 6603. 15130.
1006 CLERMONT 2935. 105. 2643. 5683.
1007 FRANKLIN 31479. 13009. 36074. 80562.
1008 GALLIA 433. 29. 988. 1451.
1009 HAMILTON 41116. 35675. 46891. 123682.
1010 LAWRENCE 1511. 982. 1741. 4236.
loll MAHONING 10970. 6746. 12354. 30075,
1012 MEIGS 268. 464. 402. 1134.
1013 MIAMI 3679. 942. 4374. 8996.
1014 MONROE 375. 0. 375. 750.
1015 MCNTGOME 26571. 22431. ?86 13. 77617.
1016 MORGAN 319. 162. 365. 847.
1017 MUSKINGA 2204. 1134. 3015. 6353.
1018 PICKAWAY 1146. 902. 1720. 3768.
1019 PIKE 405. 0. 515. 921.
— 1020 ROSS 1891. 883. 2835. 5609.
1021 SCIOTO 1986. 928. 2976. 5890,
7 1022 WARREN 2855. 290. 2207. 5351.
1023 WASHINGT 1728. 1365. 2180. 5272.
SUBTOTAL 150180. 95762. 110294. 416237.
-------
C(JUNTY NAME
1024 ALLEN
1025 DELAWARE
1026 GEAUGA
1027 GREENE
1028 JEFFERSO
1029 MEDINA
1030 PORTAGE
1031 PREBLE
1032 RICHLAND
1033 STARK
1034 SUMMIT
1035 TRUMBULL
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
12738.
3701.
4111.
9205.
9212.
6432.
9675.
2726.
iS 838.
42174.
65730.
28679.
21 0870.
TABLE 238: NATURAL (.;AS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
3900. 3148. 5690.
1459. 763. 1479.
2619. 660. 1632.
4765. S S le 3889.
3199. 2401. 3612.
3009. 785. 263’ .
4491. 1515. 3649.
1076. 206. 1445.
4846. 5207. 5785.
14055. 11887. 16232.
16995. 31044. 17741.
9359. 10207. 9112.
69774. 68392. 12104.
I —I
b—4
—a
-------
o ..i 23 NA1URAL GA CO U PT O FflP YFAP !° !5 IN ALL OTHER ORBES CUUNvit
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN aILLIONS Ur
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1036 ADAMS 356. 31. 667. 1053.
1037 ASHLAND 1436. 892. 1933. 4260.
103.8 ASHTABUL 3369. 2264. 3997. 9630.
1039 AUGLAIZE 1206. 915. 2030. 4152.
1040 CARROLL 603. 157. 653. 1413.
1041 CHAMPAIG 983. 634. 1548. 3165.
1042 CLINTON 913. 532. 1837. 3282.
1043 COLUMBIA 3402. 1521. 4162. 9084.
1044 COSHOCTO 1026. 913. 1382. 3321.
1045 CRAWFORD 1729. 1880. 2396. 6004.
1046 DARKE 1420. 399. 2618. 4437.
1047 FAIRFIEL 2333. 1490. 27Q5. 6617.
1048 FAYETTE 704. 463. 1603. 2770.
1049 GUERNSEY 1060. 659. 1189. 2 909.
1050 HARDIN 888. 754. 13 5. 3031.
1051 HARRISON 437, 75. 449. 961.
1052 HIGHLAND 707. 200. 1452. 2359.
1053 HOCKING 549. 388. 736. 1673.
1054 HOLMES 501. 153. 907. 156!.
1055 JACKSON 6 1. 329. 886. 1852.
1056 KNOX 1306. 946, 1948. 4200.
1057 LICKING 3562. 2553. 4509. 10624.
u 1058 LOGAN 997. 418. 1761. 3176.
f 1059 MADISON 753. 182. 1521. 2456.
1060 MARJON 2102. 2225. 3139. 7465.
1061 MERi ER 648. 865. 2136. 4248.
1062 MORROW 613, 202. 690. 1505.
1063 NOBLE 58. 0. 537. 595,
1066 PERRY 638. 115. 614. 1367.
1065 SHELBY 1218. 1188. 1610. 4076.
1066 TUSCAWAR 2298. 1784. 3251. 1333.
1067 UNION 790. 590. 1278. 2658.
1068 VINTON 203. 24. 203. 430.
1069 WAYNE 2962. 1988. 3846. 8796.
1070 WYANOOT 584. 248. 1248. 2080.
SUUTO IAL 42990. 27976. 63583. 134548.
ORBES—TOTAL 262942. 192128. 306580. 761654.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1071 CUYAHOGA
1072 DEFIANCE
1073 ERIE
1074 FULTON
1075 HN’ICOCK
1076 HENRY
1077 HURON
1078 LAKE
1079 LORAIN
1080 LUCAS
1081. OTTAWA
1082 PAULDING
1083 PUTNAM
1084 SANDUSKY
1085 SENECA
1086 VANWERT
1087 WILLIAMS
1088 WOOD
SUBTOTAL
STATE—TOTAL
TA8LE 230: NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 1985 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BIUS
COMMERCIAL iNDUSTRIAL
45969. 81001.
1406. 2009.
2098. 338P.
667. 2319.
860. 3224.
1092. 1622.
1153. 2364.
3525. 7431.
7093. 9678.
12531. 22872.
551. 158e.
223. 841.
709. 1693.
1785. 2802.
2103. 2864.
664. 1580.
815. 1848.
1750. 4047.
54994. 153169.
277122. 459749,
TOTAL
206493.
4631.
8287,
6010.
6218.
3637.
5114.
18889.
26225.
55570.
3325.
1596.
3253.
6601.
6890.
3156.
3749.
9096.
374799.
1136450,
COUNTIES
RESIDENTIAL
775 23.
1216.
2801.
1025.
2194.
922.
1596.
1933.
9453.
20168.
1186.
533.
852.
2014.
1923.
912.
1085.
3299.
136635.
399577.
-------
TABLt 24A; NA1UKAL ,AS CO UM H1 N r VF&P. 7 O TN ORBES PLANT COUNTIES
TN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS ift-
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1001 ATHENS 1251. 483, 2442. 4)76.
1002 BELMONT 2134. 846. 3853. 6833.
1003 BROWN 517. 95. 1441. 2113.
1004 BUTLER 7549. 8550. 12767. 28866.
1005 CLARK 5001. 4417. 10090. 19508.
1006 CLERHONT 2647. 156. 4039. 6841.
1007 FRANKLIN 28388. 19275. 55120. 102784.
1008 GALLIA 391. 44. 1509. 1944.
1009 HAMILTON 37080. 52862. 11646. 161588.
1010 LAWRENCE 1363. 1456. 2659. 5478.
loll MAHONING 9893. 9996. 18884. 38772.
1012 MEIGS 241. 667. 615. 1544.
1013 MIAMI 3318. 1396. 6684. 11398.
1014 MONROE 338. 0. 573. 911.
1015 MONTGOME 23963. 33239. 43719. 100921.
1016 M RGAN 288. 240. 558. 1081.
1017 MIJSKINGA 1988. 1680. 4607. 8274.
1018 PICKAWAY 1033. 1337. 2627. 4998.
1019 PIKE 366. 0. 781.
1020 ROSS 1706. 1309. 4331. 1153.
7346.
1021 SCIOTO 1791. 1374. 4548. 7713.
1022 WARREN 2574. 429. 3372. 6376.
1023 WASHINGT 1559. 2022. 3330. 6911.
SUBTOTAL 135436. 141895. 260202. 537533.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1C24 ALLEN
1025 DELAWARE
1026 GEALJGA
1027 GREENE
1028 JEFFERSO
1029 MEDINA
1030 PORTAGE
1031 PREBLE
1032 RICHIAND
1033 STARK
1034 SUMMIT
1035 TRUMBULL
SUBTOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
3517.
1315.
2362.
4297.
2885.
2713.
4051.
970.
4371.
12615.
15327.
8440.
62924.
TOTAL
16815.
4706.
5527.
11055.
11962.
1Q08.
11899.
3483.
20925.
5 O90.
88431.
37488.
2’5351.
TABLE 248; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN OTHER ORBES SMSA COUNTIES
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
4664. 8694.
1130. 2261.
971. 2188.
816. 5942.
3558. 5519.
1163. 4031.
2274. 5575.
305. 2208.
7715. 8839.
11613. 24 02.
45999. 27107.
15125. 13923.
1C 1340. 111087.
I -I
I ’ . )
N)
N)
-------
°!F?4c: PJAT JRAL GAS CONSUMPTP)N FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER OR s (..uurnst
iN THE STATE Of- OHIO D b LLI3 C
COUNTY NAME RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
1036 ADAMS 321. 45. 1019. 1385.
1031 ASHLAND 1295. 1321. 2953. 5569.
1038 ASHTABtJL 3038. 3354. 6107. 12500.
1039 ALJGLAIZE 1088. 1356. 3102. 5547.
1040 CARROLL 544. 231. 998. 1775.
1041 CHAMPAIG 886. 939. 2366. 4191.
1042 CLINTON 824. 789. 2807. 4419.
1043 COLiJ?IBIA 3068. 2253. 6359. 1.16R0.
1044 COSHOCTO 926. 1353. 2111. 4389.
1045 CRAWFORD 1559. 2785. 3660. 8004.
1046 DARKE 1280. 592. 4000. 5872.
1047 FAIRFIEL 2104. 2201. 4270. 8581.
1048 FAYETTE 635. 686. 2450. 3771.
1049 GUERNSEY 956. 976. 1817. 3750.
1050 HARDIN 801. 1117. 2131. 4049.
1051 HARRISON 394. 111. 686. 1191.
1052 HIGHLAND 637. 291. 2219. 3153.
1053 HOCKING 495. 575. 1125. 2195.
1054 HOLMES 452. 227. 1386. 2065.
1055 JACKSON 575. 481. 1353. 2415.
1056 KNOX 1178. 1402. 2976. 5556.
• 1057 LICKING 3212. 3783. 6889. 13884.
T 1058 LOGAPI 899. 619. 2691. 4209.
“ 1059 MADISON 679. 270. 2325. 3273.
t 1060 MARION 1896. 3297. 4796. 9988.
1061 MERCER 584. 1281. 4180. 6046.
1062 MOKROW 553. 299. 1054. 1906.
• 1063 NOBLE 52. 0. 821. 873.
1064 PERRY 575. 170. 9 P. 1684.
1065 SHEL8Y 1099. 1760. 2552. 5410.
1066 TuSCAwAR 2072. 2644. 4967. 96 3.
1067 UNION 712. 874. 1953. 3539.
• 1068 VINTON 183. 36. 310. 529.
1069 WAYNE 2611. 2946. 5876. 11494.
1070 WYANDOT 527. 361. 1907. 2801.
SUbTOTAL 38769. 61453. 97152. 177314.
(JRBES—TOTAL 237128. 284686, 468440. 990257.
-------
COUNTY NAME
1071 CUYAHOGA
1072 DEFIANCE
1073 ERIE
1014 FULTON
1075 HANCOCK
1076 HENRY
1017 HURON
1078 LAKE
1079 LORAIN
1080 LUCAS
1081 OTTAWA
1082 PAULDING
1083 PUTNAM
1084 SANDUSKY
1085 SENECA
1086 VANWERT
1087 WILLIAMS
1088 WOOf)
SUBTOTAL
STATE—IOTA L
RESIDENTIAL
69913.
1096.
2526.
924.
1978.
832.
1440.
7154.
8525.
18188.
1069.
481.
768.
1816.
1734.
823.
979.
2975.
123221.
3603 48.
TOTAL
261792.
6250.
10812.
5455.
8179.
4929.
6761.
23131.
33823.
71702.
4313.
2095.
4404.
8742.
9226.
4 20.
Suit.
11752.
483197.
1473446.
COUNTIES
TABLE 240; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION FOR YEAR 2000 IN ALL OTHER
IN THE STATE OF OHIO IN BILLIONS OF BTUS
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
68114. 123765.
2083. 3070.
3109. 5176.
988. 3543.
1275. 4926.
1618. 2479.
1709. 3612.
5223. 11354.
10510. 14787.
18567. 34947.
817. 2421.
330. 1285.
1050. 2586.
2645. 4281.
3116. 4376.
984. 2414.
1208. 2824.
2594. 6184.
125940. 234035.
410626. 102415.
------- |