REPORT TO THE CONFEREES OF THE SECOND SESSION
(PROGRESS MEETING) OF THE CONFERENCE IN THE MATTER
OF POLLUTION OF THE INTERSTATE WATERS OF
PERDIDO BAY AND ITS TRIBUTARIES
FLORIDA AND AIABAMA
SOURCE AND WTER QUALITY SURVEY
PERDIDO BAY AM) TRIBUTARIES
ALABAI^-FLJQRIDA
August 1972
Environmental Protection Agency
Surveillance and Analysis Division
Athens, Georgia
-------
The planning and operation of this project was carried
out under the supervision of B. H. Adams, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch.
Mr. J. S. Hall was Project Engineer and principal author
of the report.
All Environmental Protection Agency personnel are assigned
to the Surveillance and Analysis Division located at Athens,
Georgia. The Division is under the direction of J. A. Little.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . • , •
FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . .
PREVIOUS FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS AND
STUDY AREA. . . . . . . . . . .
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
DISCUSSION OF STUDY RESULTS .
STUDY PROGRAM . . . . . .
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE
General
May Fair Subdivision
Montclair Subdivision
Saufley Field (Navy).
Fairway Mobile Rome Park.
Avondale Subdivision.
Lincoln Park Subdivision.
Atmore, Alabama . .
Foley, Alabama . .
Robertsdale, Alabama.
Bay Minette, Alabama.
Baldwin Pole and Piling Company
Page
No .
• • • . . 1
2
. . . . . 9
• . • . . 10
. . . . . • • . . 13
19
21
• . . 21
21
21
23
• . . • . 27
28
29
31
• . . . . . . . . 32
• 33
33
34
. . . . . . . . . 35
. . . . . . . 36
37
38
. S S S • S S S S
S • S •
ENFORCEMENT ACTION.
• . S S S S
. S S S S
DI SCHARGERS
• S S •
. S I S S
. I S S
• S S • S
. . . . I I S S
________________________________ S S S • S
Newport Division, Tenneco Chemicals, Inc.
St. Regis Paper Company
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTD)
PERDIDO BAY TRIBUTARIES
General
. .
. . 41
Elevenmile Creek. . . . . . . . . 42
Pe rd i River . . . . . . . 46
Bayou Marcus Creek. . . . • 46
PERDIDO BAY . . . . . 49
General . . . . . .
CurrentNovement . .49
DissolvedOxygefl.. ... 52
Biochemical Oxygen Demand . . . 55
Bacteriological . . . . . . 56
L i_gn in — Color . . . . 59
Nitrogen. . . . . , • , • . . 61
TotaiPhosphOrOUs
Total Organic Carbon
Foam. . . . .
. . . .
. •1 •
. . . . . . . .
.64
67
. 67
REFERENCES.
69
APPENDICES • • • . . . . . . . . . .
A ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
B SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
C WATER QUALITY DATA - MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL
WASTE SOURCES
D WATER QUALITY DATA - PERDIDO BAY AND TRIBUTARIES
Title
Page
No .
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
No. No .
1 STUDY AREA. • • • , , • . • . . . . . . . . . 14
2 WEST PENSACOLA MUNICIPAL DISCHARGES 22
3 ST. REGIS WASTEWATER TREAThENT FACILITY . . . . . . 39
4 PERDIDO BAY SAMPLE LOCATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5 FLOODING CURRENT PATTERN - PERDIDO BAY. . . . . . . . . . . 53
6 TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA DISTRIBUTION - PEEWIDO BAY. 58
7 LIGNIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS - PERDIDO BAY . . . . . 60
8 COLOR-PERDIDOBAY. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. 62
9 TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN - PEROIDO BAY . 63
10 TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS - PERDIDO BAY . . . . 66
11 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON - PERDIDO BAY . . . . 68
iv
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
No. Title No .
I PERDIDO BASIN MUNICIPAL DISCHARQERS . 16
II PERDIDO BASIN INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS . . . . . . . . . . . 17
III ALABAMA AND FLORIDA WATER QUALITY CRITERIA . . . . . . . . 20
IV MUNICIPAL WASTE SOURCE DATA SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . 24
V MUNICIPAL WASTE LOAD SUMMARY 25
VI INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE DATA AND LOAD SUMMARY. . . . . . . 26
VII ST. RECIS EFFLUENT AND ELEVENMILE CREEK CONCENTRATIONS . . 44
VIII SUMMARY OF WASTE INPUT INTO PERDIDO BAY. . . . . . . . . . 47
IX PERDIDO BAY AND TRIBUTARY WATER QUALITY DATA SUMMARY . . . 48
X PERDIDO BAY STATION LOCATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
XI AVERACE DO-BOD-TOD IN PERDIDO BAY 54
XII PERDIDO BAY AND TRIBUTARY BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA SUMMARY . . 57
V
-------
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a 10—day waste characterization
and water quality study conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency
during June 1972. The report specifically characterizes and quantifies
the wastes discharged into upper Perdido Bay and its tributaries and
assesses the waste’s effects on receiving streams. The study, requested
by the conferees at the Perdido Bay Federal—State Enforcement Conference
Progress Meeting held in Gulf Breeze, Florida, during January 1972,
presents the results with regard to the enforcement conference recoin—
mendations and compares study results with previous Federal findings.
Special acknowledgment is given to the personnel of the Pensacola
District Office of the Florida State Board of Health for providing
laboratory space.
-------
FINDINGS
1. Waste loads enter Perdido Bay via Elevenmile Creek, Perdido River,
and Bayou Marcus Creek. The total loads from each waterway and the
percent of total contribution to the bay were:
Elevenmile Perdido Bayou Marcus
Creek River Creek
Load Percent Load Percent Load Percent
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(Five Day) 4,100 69 1,530 26 320 5
Total Organic Carbon 29,100 86 4,400 13 470 1
Total Suspended Solids 5,700 24 15,600 73 530 3
Lignin—like Compounds 17,400 97 610 3
2. Nitrogen, phosphorus, TOC, and total coliform concentrations were
above background levels in the upper portion of Perdido Bay, but
severe water quality degradation was not apparent.
3. Total Kjeidahl nitrogen (TKN) concentrations above background
(0.19 mg/i) were observed in the majority of the upper portion of
Perdido Bay. Elevated TKN concentrations observed in the north
and northeast sections of the bay were associated with discharges
from Elevenmile Creek; those found in the southeast section were
from Bayou Marcus Creek discharges, and those along the western
shore were from the Perdido River. TKN concentrations near the
mouth of Elevenmile Creek have decreased from 0.7 mg/i in September
1969 to 0.3 mg/i in 1972.
2
-------
4. Phosphorus concentrations in the upper portion of Perdido Bay have
not changed in the past three years. The highest concentration
(0.05 mg/i) found in the northeast section of the bay in 1972 was
associated with discharges from Elevenniile Creek. Concentrations
ranging from 0.04—0.05 mg/i were found near the mouth of Bayou
Marcus Creek.
5. Total organic carbon concentrations in Perdido Bay were primarily
associated with discharges from Elevenmile Creek. Concentrations
in the bay decreased progressively from 8 mg/i near the mouth of
Elevenmile Creek to 4 mg/i near the U. S. Highway 98 bridge.
6. Total coliform bacteria discharges from Elevenmile Creek had the
most noticeable effect on Perdido Bay. The densities gradually
decreased from a mean of 490/100 ml in the upper bay to 35/100 ml
in the lower portion of the bay. Florida’s total coliform criteria
of a monthly average not greater than 1,000/100 ml or an individual
sample not exceeding 2,400/100 ml for Class III waters (associated
with body contact activities) were violated near the mouth of
Elevenmile Creek. The arithmetic average at the station near the
creek mouth was 1,300/100 ml, and the maximum individual daily
measurement was 4,300/100 ml.
The National Shellfish Sanitation Program’s limit of 70 total coli—
forms/l00 ml was not met in the upper portion of the bay. Fecal
coliform bacterial densities were less than 35/100 ml at every bay
station.
3
-------
7. Elevenmile Creek was the major contributor of lJ.gnin—like compounds
to Perdido Bay. Concentrations of lignin—like compounds exceeded
background levels of 0.4 mg/i in the upper portion of the bay.
Concentrations ranged from 2.7 mg/l near the mouth of Elevenmile
Creek to 0.8 mg/i at the U. S. Highway 98 bridge. Concentrations
were reduced to background levels two miles below the U. S. Highway
98 bridge.
8. Color distribution over the bay paralleled lignin—like compound
concentrations with the range from 67 platinum cobalt units near
the mouth to 21 units below the U. S. Highway 98 bridge. Concen-
trations of lignin-like compounds and color of the bay water have
decreased since 1969.
9. Dissolved oxygen ranged from 6.4 to 7.4 mg/i throughout Perdido Bay
with the lower values occurring in the vicinity of Elevenmile Creek.
Florida and Alabama’s dissolved oxygen criteria of 4 iugll were
not violated.
10. Foam was never observed in Perdido Bay during the survey. However,
foam was present in the St. Regis Paper Comp fly s mill wastewater
treatment system and in Elevenmile Creek immediately downstream
from the discharge.
11. The St. Regis Paper Company mill at Cantonment, Florida, is
responsible for almost 100 percent of the waste load in Elevenmile
Creek and is the major waste contributor to Perdido Bay. Survey
4
-------
results showed that Eightmile Creek, land runoff, and the Escambia
County dump were insignificant contributors of wastes to Elevenmile
Creek. Wastewater reductions and discharges at the Pensacola Mill
were:
Parameter
BOD 5
TOC
COD
Suspended Solids
Lignin—like Compounds
Color
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Discharge
4,100 lbs per
29,100 lbs per
84,000 lbs per
5,700 lbs per
17,400 lbs per
1,100 Pt. Co.
1,084 lbs per
220 lbs per
12,000/100 ml
230/100 ml
Nitrogen and phosphorus, added to assist biological treatment, were
not completely utilized. Excessive nutrient discharges which were
measurable in Perdido Bay could cause over—enrichment.
12. The St. Regis Paper Mill is complying with enforcement conference
BOD 5 requirements of not more than 51,000 pounds per day before
treatment, 90 percent treatment reduction, and not more than 5,100
pounds per day in the final discharge.
Percent Reduction
91
49
52
88
11
15
37
71
day
day
day
day
day
Units
day
day
5
-------
13. Lincoln Park Subdivision, located north of Pensacola, discharged
80,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater into Eightmile Creek,
a tributary to Elevenmile Creek. Ninety percent of the BOD 5 and
suspended solids were removed. Chlorination equipment was inopera-
tive, and the discharge contained high total and fecal coliform
bacterial densities of 18,000,000/100 ml and 4,100,000/100 ml,
respectively.
14. Leachate from the Escambia County dump located adjacent to Elevenmile
Creek was not detectable in the creek.
15. Paper mill wastes in Elevenmile Creek interfered with the dissolved
oxygen analyses, and data are not reported.
16. The flow, type treatment, and percent BOD5 and suspended solids
removals from each waste source discharging into Bayou Marcus were:
Percent Reduction
Flow Type Suspended
Waste Source ( MCD) Treatment B0D Solids
May Fair 0.085 Secondary <60 69
(Subdivision),
Pensacola
Montclair 0.58 Secondary 70 76
(Subdivision),
Pensacola
Fairway Mobile 0.017 Secondary 44 62
Home Park,
Pensacola
Avondale 0.46 Secondary <70 42
(Subdivision),
Pensacola
6
-------
Montclair and Avondale plants were hydraulically overloaded. In
spite of chlorination which produced chlorine residuals greater
than 1 mg/i, Fairway Mobile Home Park was discharging excessive
total and fecal coliform bacterial densities —— 73,000 and 20,000-
100 ml, respectively.
17. Saufley Field (U. S. Navy) discharged 0.16 MCD of secondary treated
wastewater into Perdido Bay through a 4,500—foot ditch.
18. The following discharges to Perdido River tributaries were investi—
ga ted:
Discharger Receiving Stream
Atinore Boggy Branch
Robertsdale Rock Creek
Bay Minette Hollinger Creek
Newport Division, Tenneco Chemicals, Inc. Hollinger Creek
Baldwin Pole and Piling Company McCurtin Creek
Robertsdale provided 95 percent BOD 5 and 87 percent suspended solids
reductions. Atmore provided 84 percent and 77 percent BOD 5 and
suspended solids reductions, respectively. Bay Minette was by-
passing at the time of the survey; however, the plant has been
placed back Into service. Construction of an oxidation pond system
to serve Bay Minette began September 1, and is scheduled to be
complete in three months. The discharges from these Alabama
municipalities lowered the quality of receiving waters. However,
7
-------
because of the distance to Perdido Bay (greater than 50 miles
from Bay Minette and Atmore and about 25 miles from Robertsdale),
the waste discharges were not detectable in the bay.
Tenneco provided sedimentation and biological treatment; the loads
discharged were significant (BOD 5 — 440 pounds per day; COD — 1,960
pounds per day; total solids — 1,600 pounds per day). Tenneco
proposes to expand their treatment system to provide physical—
chemical treatment and then discharge to Bay Minette’s oxidation
ponds.
Baldwin provides only sedimentation, but because of the low flow
(2,000 gpd), the BOD5 and COD loads of 1 and 3 pounds per day,
respectively, were negligible. However, several toxic phenolic
compounds were being discharged.
19. Perdido River water quality at Florida Highway 184 bridge was
indicative of unpolluted conditions and, generally, of better
quality than the bay. However, because of the flow (285 cfs),
the river is a significant contributor of pollutants to the bay.
20. During flood tide, Perdido River flow dispersed primarily southerly
along the western shore of the bay; some flow moved easterly along
the northern portion of the bay and mixed with water from
Elevenmile Creek.
8
-------
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Nitrogen and phosphorus discharges from St. Regis and the five
domestic wastewater treatment plants in western Pensacola should
be reduced or eliminated.
2. The Florida Department of Pollution Control should monitor the
dissolved oxygen in Elevenmile Creek to determine compliance
with water quality standards.
3. The five sewage treatment plants in western Pensacola should be
consolidated into a central facility or pumped to the city’s main
wastewater treatment plant. (A similar recommendation was made
during the first enforcement conference in January 1970, but
apparently no positive action has been taken.)
4. Baldwin Pole and Piling Company in Bay Minette, Alabama, should
provide treatment to remove the phenols and other toxic sub-
stances now being discharged.
9
-------
PREVIOUS FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT ACTION
The first Federal Water Pollution Control Adininistration water
quality study of Perdido Bay was conducted during September 1969, at the
request of the Director, Technical Staff, Alabama Water Improvement
Commission. The study report concluded that wastes from the St. Regis
Paper Company at Cantonment, Florida, adversely affected Perdido Bay,
Perdido River, and Elevenmile Creek, and that water quality problems in
the mouth of Bayou Marcus were caused by collective discharges from
small sewage treatment plants.(l) The report recommended a water
quality management and waste abatement program to include St. Regis
and the sewage treatment plants. All waste abatement facilities were
to be operational by January 1, 1973.
[ n January 1970, the report was presented at the Federal-State
Perdido Bay Enforcement Conference. With minor changes, the report
recommendations were adopted by the conferees.
A second wastewater survey of the Pensacola Mill, conducted in
November 1970, established representative values of average mill dis-
charges and evaluated the strength of certain process wastes generated
within the mill. This report (2) concluded that the mill was generating
an excessive amount of wastes as compared to average Southern Kraft mill
operations and recommended that:
1/ Now the Environmental Protection Agency.
10
-------
• Generated BOD 5 waste not exceed 51,000 poun&s per day;
• Overall removal efficiency be 90 percent for carbonaceous
waste material, and
• The daily allowable BOD 5 waste load discharged into
Elevenmile Creek be reduced from 8,800 pounds per day to
5,100 pounds per day.
The second session of the enforcement conference was held during
February 25—26, 1971. The conferees concluded that water quality
degradation in Perdido Bay had continued since the first session and
the progress toward reducing waste discharges had not been satisfactory.
The conferees then recommended the BOD 5 revisions proposed in the
Federal report.
A progress evaluation meetlxig was held during January 26—27, 1972.
The conferees reviewed progress being made toward consolidation of
sewage treatment facilities discharging into Bayou Marcus Creek and
recognized improved treatment at St. Regis. However, the following
recommendations were proposed:
• St. Regis shall reduce carbonaceous organic materials and
color to the maximum degree feasible with special emphasis
on the reduction of these materials in the bleachery wastes.
• The Environmental Protection Agency and the State of
Florida shall make in—plant investigations of treatment
processes and other pollution control measures employed
by St. Regis to determine waste reductions being achieved
by the company and the effects on receiving waters.
11
-------
Special attention will be directed to the extent of the
reduction of foam—causing constituents resulting from
in—plant process changes and the installation of a
secondary treatment system. In addition, any other waste
source discharging into Perdido Bay or its tributaries
shall be investigated.
12
-------
STUDY AREA
The Perdido River Basin includes the eastern half of Baldwin County,
Alabama, a small portion of southwestern Escambia County, Alabama, and
the western portion of Escambia County, Florida (Figure 1). The Perdido
Bay drainage basin has an area of 1,134 square miles, of which, approxi-
mately 786 square miles are in Alabama.
The Perdido River rises near Bay Minette, Alabama, and flows in a
southerly direction for about 60 miles before discharging into Perdido
Bay. The main tributaries are Dyas Creek, Brushy Creek, Styx River, and
Blackwater River. Styx River, the largest tributary, drains 250 square
miles. Other upper Perdido Bay tributaries are Elevenmile Creek and
Bayou Marcus Creek. Elevenmile Creek receives:
o Treated wastewater from the St. Regis Paper Company mill
located at Cantonment, Florida;
o Drainage from the Escambia County dump located adjacent
to the creek, and
o Flow from Eightmile Creek, which drains a sparsely—populated
area northwest of Pensacola.
During dry weather, wastewater from the St. Regis Paper Mill constitutes
most of the flow in the upper reaches of Elevenmile Creek. Bayou Marcus
Creek drains residential areas west of Pensacola and receives treated
wastes from four municipal wastewater treatment plants.
Perdido Bay is two to three miles wide and approximately 15 miles
long from the upper bay to the mouth on the Gulf of Mexico. The upper
13
-------
ISCAMBIA co
4
FIGURE I
SCALE IN MILES
0123456789
— — — — —
— — — — —
U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION ]
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE. 972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
GEORGIA
•AMIO,S
ALA8ANA
FLORIDA
LOCATION MAP
FLORIt
C MnMSAI
P ,..coIa
—o
Gulf °‘
14
-------
bay, north of the U. S. Highway 98 bridge, averages less than seven feet
deep; the lower bay averages nine to ten feet. The entire bay, lower
Perdido River, and other bay tributaries are subject to tidal variation.
The constricted entrance to the bay impairs flushing within the bay.
The Perdido Basin population is about 95,000. Major populated
areas are Atmore, Bay Minette, Foley, and Robertsdale, Alabama, and the
western portion of Pensacola and Cantonment, Florida. Much of the basin
Is sparsely populated and forested. Rural unforested land in the lower
basin is agricultural.
Three municipal sewerage systems in Alabama and six in Florida
discharge wastewater into the Perdido Drainage Basin. Except for Bay
Minette, Alabama, all municipalities are providing secondary wastewater
treatment; Bay Minette has a primary plant which was bypassing during
the study period (Table I). Atmore, Alabama, and all of the Florida
systems discharge into interstate waters.
Three industrial waste point sources discharge Into the Perdido
drainage basin (Table II). The principal source is the St. Regis Paper
Company’s mill at Cantonment, Florida, which discharged 29 MCD of treated
pulp and paper wastes into Elevenmile Creek. Other sources are Tenneco
Chemicals and Baldwin Pole and Piling located at Bay Minette.
The area climate is mild. Summer temperatures average 80°F; winter
temperatures average 55°F. Annual rainfall averages 62 inches. March,
July, August, and September are the wettest months; October and November
are the driest. High intensity thunderstorms are common with three to
four inches of rain falling in one hour.
15
-------
TABLE I
PERDIDO BASIN MUNICIPAL DISCHARGERS
Discharger Treatment Receiving Stream
Atmore, Alabama Secondary (trickling filter) Brushy Creek
Bay Minette, Alabama Primary Hollinger Creek
Foley, Alabama Secondary (oxidation pond) Wolf Creek
Robertsdale, Alabama Secondary (aeration) Rock Creek
Avondale subd iv is ion
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (aeration) Bayou Marcus Creek
Fairway Mobile Home Park
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (aeration) Bayou Marcus Creek
Lincoln Park subdivision Eightmile Creek to
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (aeration) Elevenmile Creek
May Fair subdivision Belishead Creek to
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (trickling filter) Bayou Marcus Creek
Montclair subd iv is ion
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (aeration) Bayou Marcus Creek
Saufley Field (Navy)
Pensacola, Florida Secondary (trickling filter) Perdido Bay
16
-------
TABLE II
PERDIDO BASIN INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS
Discharger Treatment Receiving Stream
St. Regis Paper Company Secondary (aeration
Cantonment, Florida and settling) Elevenmile Creek
Tenneco Chemicals
Bay Minette, Alabama Secondary (biological) Hollinger Creek
Baldwin Pole & Piling Ditch to McCurtln
Bay Minette, Alabama Settling Basin Creek
17
-------
During the study period (June 5—16), the weather was hot and
generally clear with occasional afternoon thunderstorms scattered
throughout the basin. Although 0.4 inches of rain was measured in
Pensacola, only a trace amount of precipitation occurred at the paper
mill. Temperatures ranged from 70—95° with daily averages from 75—85°F.
Wind velocities varied from zero to gusts up to 35 MPH; direction was
primarily from the north and east. The weather was clear during most
of the early part of the survey; however, during the last few days of
the survey, cloud cover was 100 percent.
Flow in the Perdido River at Barrineau Park averaged 285 cfs, which
is normal for June. During the September 1969 survey, the average flow
at Barrineau Park was 332 cfs. The ten—year, 7—day low flow for the
period of record, 1942—1969, at this station is 222 cfs.
18
-------
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Interstate waters in the study area are Perdido Bay, Perdido
River, Brushy Creek, Elevenmile Creek, Eightmile Creek, and Bayou
Marcus Creek. Perdido Bay and River are interstate boundary waters
between Alabama and Florida; Brushy Creek flows across the state line;
Elevenmile Creek, Eightmile Creek, and Bayou Marcus Creek are Florida
coastal waters and tributaries to Perdido Bay.
Alabama- classified Perdido Bay for swimming, shellfish harvesting,
and fish and wildlife uses. Perdido River and Brushy Creek are classified
for fish and wildlife uses only. Florida classified Perdido Bay, Perdido
River, Bayou Marcus Creek, Eightmile Creek, and Brushy Creek as Class III
waters — — waters suitable for recreation and the propagation and manage-
ment of fish and wildlife. Elevenmile Creek was classified by Florida
as Class V waters —— waters suitable for navigation, utility, and
industrial use. Table III shows a summary of the water quality criteria
presently adopted by Alabama and Florida.
19
-------
Table III
Alabama and Florida Water Quality Criteria
Perdido Basin Use Classifications
AiaI ma ________________ Florida
Swimming Shellfish Harvesting Fish & Wildlife Class III Class V
Criteria Item*
Temperature MaX. 93°F (Not more than 10% increase above ambient) Insufficient to Not specified
damage aquatic
life, vegetation,
or interfere with
classified use
Dissolved Oxygen = 4.0 mg/i = 4.0 mg/i = 4.0 mg/i = 4.0 mg/i Not less than
1.0 mg/i (ave.
value 2.0 mg/i)
0 pM 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.5 to 8.5 6.0 to 8.5 5.0 to 9.5
(swamp waters
to 4.5)
Bacterial Monthly ave. Not exceed PHS Monthly ave.
1000/100 nil limits Not specified 1000/100 ml
(May—Sept.) daily value Not specified
2400/100 ml
Turbidity NOT SPECIFIED 50 JTV
above background Not specified
Toxic substances Free from sub— 1/10 48 hr. 1/10 48 hr. Free from sub-
stances which TLM TLM stances toxic or Not specified
render water harmful to humans,
unsuitable for animals, or
water contact aquatic life
sports
Taste, Odor & Included w/toxic No amount that will injure aquatic No amount suf— No amount that
color producing substances life, imoair markctabi.lity or ficient to create will interfere
substances palatability or unreas cb1y affect a n icancc. with c1ass f ted
aesthetic use value. use.
-------
DISCUSSION OF STUDY RESULTS
STUDY PROC RAN
To comply with recommendations of the January 1972, Perdido Bay
Enforcement Conference Progress Meeting, a field survey was conducted
during June 5—16, 1972. The survey was designed to characterize all
wastes discharging into Perdido Bay and its tributaries, determine the
effects of discharges on receiving streams, and document foam—causing
constituents in Perdido Bay and in discharges into the bay.
Influent and effluent samples were collected at each unit within
the St. Regis Paper Mill wastewater treatment system and at each municipal
wastewater treatment system. Effluent samples were also collected from
Tenneco and Baldwin Pole and Piling Company in Bay Mlnette, Alabama.
Flows were obtained at all waste sampling locations. Samples were also
collected from Perdido Bay, Perdido River, Elevenmile Creek and Bayou
Marcus Creek. Sampling location descriptions and required analyses are
listed in the respective sections of this report. All analyses were
conducted in accordance with Standard Methods for Examination of Water
and Wastewater , 13th Edition, or EPA Manual of Methods for Chemical
Analyses of Water and Wastes , 1971. Appendix B contains a detailed
description of study methods and analytical procedures.
MUNIC IPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER D ISCHARGERS
General
Ten municipal wastewater treatment plants and three industrial
facilities were investigated during the survey (Figures 1 and 2).
21
-------
WEST PENSACOLA MUNICIPAL DISCHARGES
Prdidc Riv#r
Baldwin Co.
FIGURE 2
1
SCALE IN MILES
I 2
—I
U.S. ENVIRONMEP4TAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 17
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 972
p
N
Pork WI P
L .
—
I — — — — —
— — — — —
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
-------
Efficiency studies (one 24—hour composite from influent and effluent
locations) were conducted at nine of the municipal plants. Bay Minette,
Alabama, was bypassing during the study period and only raw wastewater
samples were collected. Industrial wastewater sampling consisted of:
• An effluent sample (24—hour composite) from Tenneco;
• One grab sample at Baldwin Pole and Piling, and,
• A complete evaluation of waste treatment facilities
at the St. Regis Paper Company mill (separate report).
Results of municipal sampling are shown in Tables IV and V. Industrial
effluent concentrations and loads are presented in Table VI.
May Fair (Subdivision) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The May Fair subdivision is served by a secondary waste treatment
plant located adjacent to Amazon Street. The plant, operated by the
Pioneer Water Company, treats domestic wastes from the subdivision.
Treatment units include a Spirahoff tank, trickling filter, chlorinator,
and polishing pond. Discharge is into Bayou Marcus Creek via Bellshead
Branch.
During the survey, the average flow was 85,000 gallons per day.
The design capacity is 155,000 gpd, and although the plant was not
hydraulically overloaded, removal efficiencies were below efficiencies
normally expected of a secondary type treatment plant. Study results
showed TX, COD, and suspended solids reductions of 39, 38, and 69
percent, respectively (Table ‘1). BOD results were not obtained because
of contaminated dilution water, but based on comparative removals of
23
-------
TABLE
MUNICIPAL LASTh SGJRCE DATA SUIIM&RY
Residue (mgI 1 ) Nitrogenous Compounds-N
Total Volatile
(mg/i)
Total
Phos—P
Municipality
(MOD) (mg/i)
(mg/i)
(mg/i) NFLT
NAT
Ti0
j
N02—N03
(mg/i)
May Fair
— Influent
0.085 7.0 Loat*
57
541 180
140
30.0
Effluent
0.085 7.3 Lost
35
335 56
36
28.5
0.01
17.6
(2 Removal)
(39)
(38) (69)
(74)
(5)
8.0
(62)
0.45
—
18.8
Montclair
— Influent
Effluant
(2 Removal)
0.58 7.1 204
0.58 7.3 62
(70)
150
48
(68)
529 180
199 44
(62) (76)
170
44
(74)
28.5
19.8
(31)
20.6
16.0
(22)
<0.01
0.09
—
16.7
16.0
(4)
Saufley Field
— Influent
Effluent
(2 Removal)
0.16 6.4 Loet*
0.16 6.3 Lost
46
556 140
174 45
(69) (68)
130
41
(68)
19.0
7.5
(61)
8.4
2.9
(65)
0.02
6.5
6.9
6.9
Fairway Mobile
— Influent
0.017 7.4 306
—
334 81
70
27.0
17.2
<0.01
8.2
Home Park
Effluent
(2 RemovRl)
o.oii 6.9 170
(44)
—
82 31
(75) (62)
24
(66)
10.0
(63)
4.5
(74)
2.04
12.5
Avondale
— Influent
Effluent
(2 Removal)
0.46 6.5 Lost*
0.46 7.2 Lost
—
40
462 120
232 70
(50) (42)
100
64
(36)
27.0
16.5
(39)
17.2
11.8
(31)
<0.01
0.02
—
13.0
13.3
—
Lincoln Park
— Inf luent
EffluAnt
(2 Remnval)
0.08 6.7 420
0.08 6.9 26
(94)
150
17
(89)
1,390 250
84 24
(94) (90)
200
18
(91)
29.0
21.5
(26)
21.9
19.5
(11)
<0.01
0.02
—
13.0
12.8
—
Atmore, AL
— Influent
Effluent
(2 Removal)
0.547 6.9 230
0.547 6.9 37
(84)
—
28
422 120
52 28
(88) (77)
88
<5
(94)
28.0
12.0
(57)
20.0
10.6
(47)
<0.01
1.8
—
15.5
11.9
(23)
Foley, AL
— Influent
Effluent
(2 Removal)
0.24 7.3 136
0.24 7.3 23
(83)
24
30
444 86
134 17
(70) (80)
60
14
(77)
19.0
7.0
(63)
12.7
4.8
(62)
0.01
0.04
—
11.6
8.0
(31)
Robertadale, AL
— Influent
Effluent
(2 Removal)
0.101 6.5 261
0.101 6.5 13
(95)
92
10
(89)
495 100
60 14
(88) (86)
82
10
(88)
13.5
1.4
(90)
5.7
0.5
(91)
0.3
1.0
—
13.4
2.2
(84)
Bay Minette, AL
— Raw
0.88 6.6 208
—
530 220
180
19.0
14.4
<0.01
11.5
T. Chlorine
Coliform (MPN/100 ml ) Residual
Total Fecal ( mg/i )
93,000,000 17,000,000
180.000 76,000 3.3
160,000,000 33.000,000
74 63 4.7
150,000,000 13,000,000
66 25 1.3
120,000,000 40,000,000
73,000 20,000 1.1
61,000,000 34,000,000
800 <200 1.3
18,000,000 4,100,000
*Contaminated dilution water caused oxygen depletion in bottles.
-------
TABLE V
MUNICIPAL WASTE LOAD SUMMARY (LBS/DAY)
Residue
Flow Total Volatile Nitrogenous Compound—N Total
Municipality ( MGD) BOD5 TOC COD NFLT NFLT TKN NH3 N02—N03 Phos-P
May Fair 0.085 — 25 237 40 26 20 5.7 0.3 13
Montclair 0.58 300 232 963 213 213 96 77 0.4 77
Saufley Field 0.16 61 232 60 55 10 3.9 8.7 9.2
Fl Fairway Mobile
Home Park 0.017 24 — 12 4.4 3.4 1.4 0.6 0.3 1.8
Avondale 0.46 — 153 890 269 246 63 45 0.1 51
Lincoln Park 0.08 17 11 56 16 12 14 13 0.01 8.5
Atmore, AL 0.547 169 128 237 128 23 55 48 8.2 54
Foley, AL 0.24 46 60 268 34 28 14 9.6 0.1 16
Robertsdale, AL 0.101 11 8 51 12 8.4 1.1 0.4 0.8 1.8
Bay Minette, AL 0.88 1,530 — 3,900 1,610 1,320 139 106 0.1 84
-------
TABLE
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE DATA AND LOAD SUMMARY
PERDIDO BAY WATER QUALITY SURVEY
June, 1972
DATA SIThARY
Residue
Total Total Total Vol. Settle— Color Nitrogenous Compounds—N
Flow Temp. BOD5 TOC COD Total Dies. Vol. NFLT MELT able L .gniri (Pt-Co. TKN NH3 1102—N03 Total P Phenol
Industry (KGD) (°C) p11 (mg/i) (mg/I.) (mg/i) (mg/i) (nigh) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (rig/i) (mg/I) Units) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (ug/]. )
St. Regis
Paper Co.
Cantonment,
Florida
Influenc 25.9 39 9.5 210 264 813 — — — — 228 139 —— 91 1294 1270
Effluent
28.6
29.8
8.0 17
122
352
—
——
——
24
12
<0.5
73
1100
4.0
1.01
0.56
0.94
30
Tenneco, Inc.
Bay Minette,
Alabama
Effluent
0.156
——
7.2 340
——
1510
1230
1120
420
120
88
——
——
——
0.8
<0.Oi
<0.01
1.2
515 -
Baldwin Pole
.
& Piling Co.
Bay Minette,
Alabama
Effluent
0.002
——
7.0 59
——
174
140
110
120
28
20
——
——
300
9,100
LOAD SUMMARY (lbs/day )
St. Regis 28.6 4100 29,100 84,000 — — — — 5120 2860 — 17,400 —— 950 240 134 220 7
Tenneco 0.156 440 —— 1,960 1,600 1,460 550 160 115 —— —— — — 1 —— — — 1.5 .1
Baldwin 0.002 1 —— 3 2.3 1.8 2.0 0.5 0.3 —— .15
-------
parameters at other trickling filter plants, it is doubtful that BOD5
reductions would exceed 50 percent. Monthly reports submitted to the
Florida Department of Pollution Control (FDPC) since January 1972,
showed the average B aD 5 reduction to be 80 percent. The same report
showed 66 percent suspended solids removal.
Nitrogen in the influent was primarily ammonia. Treatment oxidized
and reduced the ammonia to nitrite—nitrate nitrogen and organic nitrogen.
This was the only plant investigated where ammonia was significnttly
reduced.
Total and fecal coliform reductions appeared to be poor even though
the average chlorine residual exceeded 3 mg/i. Effluent total and fecal
coliform bacterial densities had means of 180,000 and 76,000/100 ml,
respectively. This discrepancy is a result of arithmetically averaging
chlorine residuals which ranged from 0.15 to S mg/i and geometrically
averaging the coliform densities which ranged from 2300 to 9,200,000/100 ml
for total and 2300 to 3,500,000/100 ml for fecal. Individually, a high
chlorine residual resulted in low coliform densities.
The plant discharged a small waste load (Table V) to Bellshead
Branch. However, as this stream drains a small suburban area in western
Pensacola, the low flow therein — — especially during dry weather ——
would probably not assimilate the wastes.
Montclair (Subdivision) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The wastewater treatment plant serving the Montclair subdivision
is located at the west end of Marseille Drive. The plant provides
secondary treatment for the domestic wastes from the subdivision’s
27
-------
residents. Treatment units at the plant include primary and secondary
clarifiers, trickling filter, polishing pond, and chlorinator. Dis-
charge is into a ditch to Belishead Branch which flows into Bayou
Marcus Creek.
The present flow of 580,000 gallons per day through the plant
exceeded the hydraulic design capacity of 500,000 gpd. Effects of
the hydraulic overload are reflected in the low BOD 5 , TOC and COD
reductions of 70, 68, and 62 percent, respectively. Average BOD 5
removal for the winter months, reported to the FDPC, was 85 percent.
Reported suspended solids removals were 75 percent; during this study
a 76 percent reduction was measured. Study results showed that total
nitrogen was reduced 30 percent; phosphorus reduction was negligible.
Effluent total and fecal coliform densities were 74 and 631100 ml,
respectively. These low density levels show excellent chlorination
results. The total chlorine residual was greater than 4 mg/i.
Water quality in Bellshead Branch was not monitored. However,
in view of the large waste loads discharged (Table V), it is highly
probable that water quality in the stream is severely degraded.
Saufley Field (Navy )
The wastewater treatment plant serving Saufley Field is located
at the southwest corner of the Federal Installation. The plant receives
domestic wastes from a population of 1,700 and some industrial wastes
from aircraft washing and engine cleaning. The secondary plant is a
standard rate trickling filter plant with chlorination. Flow during
the survey was 160,000 gallons per day; however, the Navy indicated
28
-------
that the average flow was usually 225,000 gpd. Discharge is into
Perdido Bay through a 4,500—foot concrete—lined ditch.
The hydraulic design capacity of the plant is 210,000 gpd. Al-
though the plant did not appear to be hydraulically overloaded during
the survey, removal efficiencies were below values normally expected
from a secondary type treatment plant. Contaminated dilution water
precluded BOD 5 results; however, the Navy stated that BOD 5 reduction
averaged about 91 percent. Suspended solids removals were also r aported
to average 93 percent; however, during this survey, a 68 percent reduction
was determined (Table IV). Study results shoved that 69 percent of the
COD was removed. Low efficiencies indicate that toxic degreasing compounds
in the engine cleaning vastewater might be interfering with biodegradation.
The TKN and ammonia nitrogen decreases along with a nitrite—nitrate
nitrogen increase show significant waste oxidation. Phosphorus removal
was nil.
Bacterial reductions were excellent. Total and fecal coliform
densities were 66 and 25/100 ml, respectively. The total chlorine
residual was greater than 1 mg/i.
Although a moderate waste load (Table V) was discharged, its effect
on Perdido Bay was probably masked by the volume of wastewater in
Eleven nh1e Creek.
Fairway Mobile Home Court Wastewater Treatment Plant
The wastewater treatment facility serving the Fairway Mobile
Home Court is located within the Fairway Mobile Home Park north of
Michigan Avenue and east of Crescent Lake. The plant, operated by
29
-------
the Pioneer Water Company, provided secondary treatment (extended
aeration and chlorination) for the domestic wastes from the residence
of 140 mobile homes. Discharge is into Bayou Marcus Creek.
The plant is designed for a flow of 30,000 gpd. Although the
plant was not hydraulically overloaded (present flow — 17,000 gpd),
BOD 5 reduction was much lower (44 percent) than expected from an ex-
tended aeration plant (Table IV). Monthly reports submitted to the
FDPC since January 1972 indicate a 95 percent BOD 5 reduction. The
same report showed that suspended solids removals averaged 75 percent;
a 62 percent reduction was measured during the survey. The COD re-
duction was 75 percent —— much greater than expected with the low BOD 5
removal.
TKN and ammonia nitrogen decreases were 63 percent and 74 percent,
respectively. The increase in nitrite—nitrate nitrogen concentrations
from less than 0.01 mg/i to 2.04 mg/i reflects significant waste
oxidation.
Total and fecal coiiform reductions were greater than 99.9%;
however, the geometric mean densities discharged were 73,000/100 ml ——
total and 20,000/100 ml —— fecal. The average total chlorine residual was
1.1 mg/i, and a greater bacterial reduction should have resulted. The
higher than normal discharge densities may have been due to inadequate
contact time and/or unavailable chlorine. Total chlorine residual was
measured and a portion of this was probably utilized in the oxidation
of organic matter.
30
-------
The small waste load discharged (Table V) would probably not
severely degrade a small receiving stream such as Bayou Marcus Creek;
however, the cumulative effect of all discharges into the creek may
cause noticeable water quality degradation.
Avondale (Subdivision) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The wastewater treatment plant serving the Avondale subdivision
is located west of Beliview Road and north of Bayou Marcus Creek.
The plant provided secondary treatment (extended aeration and chlori-
nation) for the domestic wastes from the subdivision residents.
(There is no industrial waste from the subdivision.) Discharge is
into Bayou Marcus Creek.
The hydraulic design capacity of the plant is 350,000 gpd. The
present flow of 460,000 gpd hydraulically overloaded the facility
and reduced plant efficiency. Reductions of COD, suspended solids
and total nitrogen were 50, 42, and 39 percent, respectively (Table IV).
Nitrogen oxidation was slight. Contaminated dilution water precluded
EPA BOD 5 results, but based on comparative removals of parameters at
other extended aeration plants, it is doubtful that BOD5 reductions
would exceed 75 percent. The monthly report submitted to the FDPC
indicated that suspended solids and BOD5 removals average 85 and 90
percent, respectively.
Total and feca]. coliform densities discharged were 800 and <200/100
ml, respectively; chlorine residual was greater than 1 mg/i.
The plant discharged a large organic waste load (Table V) to Bayou
Marcus Creek downstream from the sampling station on Beliview Road,
31
-------
and the effects of the discharge on the creek were not measured. The
wastes would probably have a measurable effect on the bay if they were
discharged directly into the bay.
Lincoln Park (Subdivision) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The Lincoln Park subdivision is served by a secondary treatment
facility located near the west end of Arron Drive (north of Interstate 10
and west of U.S. 29). Wastewater treatment for domestic waste generated
within the subdivision includes contact stabilization followed by
chlorination and polishing ponds. Discharge is into Eightmile Creek,
a tributary of Elevenmile Creek.
The plant, operating at its hydraulic design capacity of 80,000
gpd, achieved excellent organic and solids removals; BOD 5 removal was
94 percent, TOC — 89 percent, COD — 94 percent, total and volatile
suspended solids — 90 percent (Table IV). There was some nitrogen
oxidation, but phosphorus removal was negligible. The effluent con—
tamed high coliform densities which Indicated the chlorinator was
not operating. The effluent contained total and fecal coliform
bacterial densities of 18,000,000 and 4,100,000/100 ml, respectively.
The plant discharged a small (17 pounds per day — BOD 5 ; 11 pounds
per day — TOC; 16 pounds per day — suspended solids) waste load into
Eightmile Creek. Although water quality in Eightmile Creek was not
monitored, increased bacterial densities would probably be the most
noticeable change In water quality resulting from this discharge.
32
-------
Atmore, Alabama
The plant serving Atmore is located west of town on U.S. Highway
31. The secondary wastewater treatment facility (high—rate trickling
filter, primary and secondary clarification —— no chlorination) serves
a population of about 9,000. Discharge is into Boggy Creek which flows
into Brushy Creek —— an interstate stream. Brushy Creek flows 20 miles
to the Perdido River. The hydraulic design capacity of the plant is
1.5 MCD; present flow was approximately 0.55 MGD. The plant operator
stated that there was a high rate of infiltration; however, the survey
wastewater volume of 61 gallons per capita per day does not indicate
an excessive amount of infiltration.
Treatment removals were: BOD 5 — 84 percent, COD — 88 percent,
total suspended solids — 77 percent, volatile suspended solids — 94
percent, total nitrogen — 57 percent, and phosphorus — 23 percent
(Table IV). Previously reported data to the Alabama Water Improvement
Commission (AWIC) showed BOD 5 removal to average about 80 percent.
The discharged waste load (Table V) probably has only a minor
effect on Brushy Creek. Based on U. S. Geological Survey data, di-
lution at the discharge point is 20:1 for average yearly flows and
10—15:1 during dry weather.
Foley, Alabama
The wastewater treatment plant serving Foley is located east of
town near U.S. Highway 98. It provides secondary treatment (oxidation
pond —— no chlorination) for the wastes from approximately 1,400
people. Survey flow was approximately 240,000 gallons per day. Dis-
charge is into Wolf Creek, a tributary to Wolf Bay. The oxidation
33
-------
pond is designed to serve 3,000 people, the town’s present population.
The measured treatment efficiencies were in the range of those
expected from a satisfactorily operating oxidation pond. Percent
removals were: BOD 5 — 83, COD — 70, suspended solids — 80, total
nitrogen — 63, and total phosphorus — 31 (Table IV). The BOD 5 removal
previously reported to the AWIC averaged 87 percent.
The plant contributed a small (Table V) load to Wolf Creek. How-
ever, because of the low stream flow at the discharge point (creek
originates in Foley), the waste probably degrades the stream quality.
Rober tsdale, Alabama
The wastewater treatment plant serving Robertsdale is located on
the east side of town. It provides secondary treatment for the wastes
from 1,300 of the town’s 2,100 residents. The plant, designed to serve
2,500 people (0.25 MGD), is an extended aeration type. Principal treat-
ment units include a conmiinuting device, two aeration basins, aeration
equipment and a sludge settling compartment. The aeration basins have
a combined volume of 251,300 gallons. Air is supplied to the basins by
three blowers each having a capacity of 300 cubic feet per minute. Sur-
vey flow was 100,000 gallons per day; discharge is into Rock Creek, a
tributary of Blackwater River.
This plant provided the highest degree of treatment of any plant
investigated. Percent removals were BOD5 — 95, TOC — 89, COD — 88,
suspended solids — 87, TKN — 90, and phosphorus — 84 (Table IV).
Previously—reported B0D 5 removals to the state were 83 percent.
34
-------
A well—treated wastewater —— BOD 5 — 13 mg/i (11 pounds per day),
TOC — 10 mg/i (8 pounds per day), COD — 60 mg/i (51 pounds per day),
total suspended solids — 14 mg/i (12 pounds per day), total nitrogen —
2.4 mg/i (1.9 pounds per day), and total phosphorus — 2.2 mg/i (1.8
pounds per day) —— was discharged into Rock Creek.
Bay Minette, Alabama
Bay Minette has two wastewater treatment plants. The northwest
portion of town, about 10 percent of the sewered population, is served
by a waste stabilization pond which discharges Into the Mobile River
Basin. The other treatment facility, a primary plant, serves the
remainder of the sewered population. The plant, located east of the
city near U. S. Highway 31, discharges into the Perdido drainage basin.
During the survey, this plant was being bypassed and, reportedly had
been bypassing for an extended period of time. The plant, however,
has been placed back into operation since the survey. The wastewater
from 5,000 people (880,000 gpd) flowed via a ditch into Hoilinger Creek
and thence into the Styx River.
The loads discharged (Table V) undoubtedly severely affected water
quality in the receiving stream because of the low flow; Hollinger Creek
originates in Bay Minette.
A construction grant was awarded to Bay Minette for the construction
of a stabilization pond system to replace the primary facility. The
proposed system will consist of one 53.3—acre primary pond, an 11—acre
secondary pond, and an 11—acre polishing pond. The system will also
treat the industrial wastes from the Newport Division of Tenneco
35
-------
Chemicals, Inc., located in Bay Minette. Final plans were to have been
submitted in January 1972, with construction to have been complete
August 1972. The site originally selected was later determined to be
too close to populated areas, and relocation has caused a three months
delay. Construction is scheduled to begin September 1, 1972.
Baldwin Pole and Piling Company, Bay Minette, Alabama
The Baldwin Pole and Piling Company operation is located on the
east side of town adjacent to U. S. Highway 31. The operation consists
of treating poles, posts, piles, and lumber with creosote to prevent
decay and protect against insects. The process includes preservative
Impregnation, vacuum conditioning for cleanliness and excess creosote
recovery, and post steam treatment.
The log debarking, size separating and other pretreating facilities
are located on the south side of U.S. Highway 31 about one mile from the
creosote treatment facility. The only water used at this site is for
sanitary purposes.
Wastewater from the final steam treatment contains impurities.
This wastewater, steam condensate, and surface runoff drain into a
ditch which, before leaving the property, flows through an old settling
basin into a natural ponding system. Wastewater eventually reaches
McCurtin Creek which flows into Dyas Creek, a tributary to Perdido
River. A gas chromatograph/mass spectrometric analysis of the effluent
showed organics normally found in creosote, a conunercial fraction
derived from coal tar. The primary environmental effect of these
organics would be taste and odor problems. However, the phenolics,
36
-------
quinolines, and phenanthrene are also toxic to fish. Several of the
polycyclic, aromatic hydrocarbons such as acenapthene and phenanthrene
have caused benign tumors in test animals. Appendix D contains a
detailed description of each compound identified. The CC/MS analyses
showed 7,500 pg/i of phenols while the chlotimetric analysis showed
9,100 pg/i. Either colorimetric positive interferences were present
(as the CC/MS method is a more accurate phenol detector) or phenolic
organic present was not extractable for GC/MS analyses. Waste flow was
about 2,000 gpd, and the loads discharged were small (Table VI).
Newport Division, Tenneco Chemicals, Inc., Bay Minette, Alabama
The Newport Division of Tenneco Chemicals, Inc., operates a plant
located in the southwest section of Bay Minette. Plant operation con-
sists of refining crude tail oil and sulfate turpentine purchased
from Kraft pulp and paper mills. These refined products are used in
the manufacture of fatty acids, resins, terpene, paper size, gloss
oils and rubber emulsifying agents.
Process wastewater and contaminated surface runoff are being treated
in ponds which provide settling and some biological treatment. Sanitary
wastes are discharged to the city sewerage system. Process wasteflow
during this survey was 0.156 mgd; discharge is into Hollinger Creek.
The principal waste treatment problem is emulsions in water. The
company’s consulting engineer has made recommendations for either partial
or complete treatment. Partial treatment will be provided if the wastes
are discharged to the proposed Bay Minette municipal treatment facility.
Complete treatment viii be provided if the company does not use the
37
-------
municipal system. Pre—treatment would be physical—chemical. Complete
treatment would be physical—chemical followed by biological.
A gas chroinatograph/inass spectrometric analysis of the effluent
showed many organic compounds which were primarily hydrocarbons typical
of oil (Appendix D). The effluent contained 190 mg/l of oil and grease.
Two fatty acids and one resin acid were also detected. These acids are
foam—causing constituents.
The company’s wastewater discharge (Table VI) probably has a very
noticeable affect on water quality in Hollinger Creek because of low
flow in the creek at the point of discharge. Hollinger Creek flows into
the Styx River and thence into the Perdido River; however, the poi—
lutional effects on Perdido Bay were not measurable —— distance to the
bay is about 50 miles.
St. Regis Paper Company, Cantonment, Florida
St. Regis operates an integrated pulp and paper mill which, during
the survey, produced approximately 830 tons per day of bleached and Un—
bleached pulp by the sulfate (Kraft) process. Approximately 280 tons
per day of pulp were bleached. Pulp was converted into approximately
785 tons per day of bleached and unbleached products. Liquid wastes,
generated in the mill, are discharged into Perdido Bay via Elevenmile
Creek.
The wastewater treatment facilities consist of a primary settling
basin, a nutrient feed system (anhydrous ammonia and phosphoric acid),
three aeration ponds (Nos. 1 and 2 in parallel), and a final settling
pond (Figure 3). Riffle terraces are located before and after the final
38
-------
FIGURE 3
S. REGIS WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
çí
-
‘zz No. 2 Ditch (Uribleoched) / ___
KEY
o Sampling Station
• Aerator
O Riffle Terraces
SR-2 (Parshall Flume)
SR-
Zch
(bleached)
‘ .0
Mill Effluent
Dump
. -No.lPond SR-5
-4 (Parstioll Flume)
No. 4 Pond
Settling Basin
Nutrient F..d System
(Anhydrous Ammonia 8
Phosphoric Acid)
.1
C.-
/
/
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
— PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
GEORGIA
ATHENS
-------
pond. During dry weather, the wastewater discharged into Eleveninile
Creek makes up most of the flow. Sanitary wastes were treated in
several septic tanks with drain fields.
An evaluation of the wastewater treatment facility showed that the
average wastewater volume was 28.6 MGD; waste loads and average re-
ductions were:
Parameter Percent Reduction Final Discharge
BOD 91 4,100 lbs per day
TOC 49 29,100 lbs per day
COD 52 84,000 lbs per day
Suspended Solids 88 5,720 lbs per day
Lignin 11 17,400 lbs per day
Color 15 1,100 Pt.—Co. Units
All of the nitrogen and phosphorus added by the nutrient feed system
as part of the treatment process were not being removed effectively.
The nitrogen and phosphorus in the discharge reflect both unused nutrients
and the presence of waste—assimilating microorganisms which contain the
nutrients. Optimal nutrient feed concentrations and methods to reduce
the volume of microorganisms in the discharge are necessary. Excessive
total nitrogen (1,084 pounds per day) and total phosphorus (220 pounds per
day) were being discharged; these nutrients could adversely affect
Perdido Bay’s water quality either through over—enrichment or degradation
by sludge deposits.
40
-------
Only a minor amount of fecal contamination was discharged into
Elevenmile Creek. Untreated waste had geometric mean total and fecal
coliform bacterial densities of 19,000 and 790/100 ml, respectively.
Treatment reduced the total coliform density to 12,000/100 ml (37
percent reduction) and the fecal coliform density to 230/100 ml (71
percent reduction).
Gas chromatograph/mass spec trometric analyses on the untreated and
treated wastewater showed organics typical of paper mill wastes. The
organics were constituents of wood or degradation products of wood
constituents (Appendix D). Treatment reduced the foam—causing consti-
tuents, fatty and resin acids, by 66 percent —— from 3,500 ug/l to
1,200 pg/l. Phenolics —— toxic to man and fish —— were reduced from
2,000 ug/l at the influent to the primary settling basin to below
detectable limits at the final discharge into Elevenmile Creek. A scan
of the raw water source (Station SR—8) did not reveal the presence of
any organic compounds in concentrations greater than 10 pg/l.
The detrimental effect which the paper mill’s discharge has
on the water quality in Elevenmile Creek and Perdido Bay is discussed
later in the report.
PERDIDO BAY TRIBUTARIES
General
To evaluate the effect of waste discharges on these streams, water
quality was analyzed at the following locations in Elevenmile Creek,
Perdido River, and Bayou Marcus Creek:
41
-------
EPA
Station
No. Location
PR—i Perdido River at Florida Hwy. 184 W. of Cantonment, Florida
P—i Perdido River at mouth
B—i Bayou Marcus at mouth
EM—i Elevenmile Creek at State Route 297A
EM-2 Elevenmile Creek at State Route 10 (US 90A)
Eleveninile Creek at Route 1OA (US 90)
E24—4 Elevenmile Creek at mouth
Elevenmile Creek
The majority of the wastes discharged into Elevenmile Creek came
from the St. Regis Paper Company mill at Cantonment, Florida. During
dry weather, the mill’s waste discharge makes up most of the flow in
the upper reaches of the creek. The Lincoln Park subdivision, located
north of Pensacola, discharges a relatively small wastewater volume into
Eightmile Creek, a tributary to Elevenmile Creek.
Escambia County operates an open, non—burning dump adjacent to
Elevenmile Creek about one mile north of U. S. Highway 90. The dump
has “dry” and “wet” disposal areas. Dry area operation consists of
dumping and compacting several months accumulation of solid wastes to
a given elevation and then covering with dirt. Wet area operation consists
of discharging septic tank wastes and disgested sludge from Pensacola’s
main wastewater treatment plant on the bank of a previously “constructed”
solid waste fill. In June 1972, the dump was diked along the creek,
and dredging for dike construction was in progress along the north
42
-------
side of the property during the survey. The presence of leachate from
this dump was not detectable in Elevenmile Creek.
At Florida Highway 297A (Station EM—I), located about two miles
downstream from St. Regis, all parameter concentrations were approximately
the same as in the paper mill effluent (Table VII). With the dry weather
conditions and negligible runoff reaching the creek, little infiltration
would have occurred during the period of study. From Station EM—i to
the bay, parameter concentrations generally decreased, reflectir.g
dilution, settling and biological degradation. Most parameters showed
the greatest reduction between U.S. Righway 90 and the Bay. This was
probably due to the effect of tidal dilution.
The creek conveyed significant nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations
(2.38 mg/l and 0.46 mg/i) into the bay. These levels could aggravate
water quality degradation by causing over—enrichment resulting in excessive
algal blooms. The mean total coliform densities in Elevenmile Creek
ranged from 5,300 to 15,000/100 ml at Stations EM—3 and EM—l, respectively.
The creek contributed mean total and fecal coiiform densities of 11,000
and 110/100 ml, respectively, to Perdido Bay.
During the June 1972 survey, dissolved oxygen (DO) was determined
by the Winkier (azide modification) method. However, questions arose
concerning the accuracy of DO results using the Winkler method in
waters containing Kraft paper mill wastes. Subsequently, a limited
field investigation was conducted to determine the DO of Elevenmile
Creek using the following:
43
-------
TABLE VII
ST. REGIS EFFLUENT AND ELEVENNILE CREEK CONCENTRATIONS
PARTIAL DATA SUMMARY
PERDIDO BAY WATER QUALITY SURVEY
Residue
BOD TOC COD Total NYLT Vol. NFLT Color Lignin
( mgfl) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (Pt. Co. Units) (mg/i )
St. Regis’
Effiuent 17 122 352 24 12 1100 73
4—l 19 116 340 31 10 1030 70
16 106 299 28 10 878 63
EM—3 13 73 234 28 12 689 49
Flf—4 6.5 63 14 7 588 38
% Reduction
from Effluent
to F21—4 62 48 42 42 47 48
-------
• Winider (azide modification) run immediately;
• Winkler (azide modification) dosed in field and
acidified in lab, then titrated;
• Weston Stack DO probe, and
• Yellow Springs Instruments DO probe.
The conclusions from the comparative study showed that:
• Winkler values were 2 to 3 mg/l lower than probe values.
• The Winkler value on an immediately—titrated sample is
higher than on a dosed sample held for some time.
• The YSI probe value is consistently lower than the Weston
Stack value in paper mill waste and tap water but not
distilled water.
• On aerated paper mill waste and aerated tap water, both
probes produce comparable results.
• The Weston Stack probe and the Winkler DO tap water do
not compare, but the YSI probe and Winkler are comparable
on tap water. Once the tap water is aerated, all three
are comparable.
Because of the interference differences, the Winkler DO values
for Elevenmile Creek obtained during the June survey are not included
in this report.
In 1969, BOD 5 in Elevenmile Creek at Station EM—l (Florida Highway
297A) averaged 151 mg/l; at Station E24—3 (U. S. Highway 90) the BOD
averaged 121 mg/l. The total organic carbon at Stations Etl—l and EM—3,
45
-------
were 72 and 35 mg/i, respectively —— much less than values recorded
during the 1972 study. In general, the water quality of Elevenmile
Creek has improved since September 1969. However, Elevenmile Creek is
still the largest waste contributor to Perdido Bay with the daily
discharge contributing 4,100 pounds of BOD 5 (Table VIII).
Perdido River
Samples collected at Station PR—i (Florida Highway 184), which is
above tidal influence, reflected background water quality. The average
parameter concentrations observed showed the river at this location to be
relatively unpolluted and generally of better quality than bay water
at locations sampled (Table IX). The mean total and fecal coliform
densities at this point were 970 and 110/100 ml, respectively. The mean
total and fecal coliform contributions of the Perdido River to Perdido
Bay were 290 and 23/100 ml, respectively, as measured at the mouth of
the river (Station P—i). Although there are upstream waste sources, the
wastes are diluted and/or stabilized by the time they reach this point.
During the latter part of the survey, rainfall within the basin caused
river flow and suspended solids concentrations to increase slightly.
Because of the large volume of flow in Perdido River, the river is second
only to St. Regis in the volume of pollutants discharged into Perdido Bay
(Table VIII). However, because of the stability of the pollutants, the
river does not detrimentally affect water quality In the bay.
Bayou Marcus Creek
Analytical results of samples collected from Bayou Marcus Creek at
Beilview Road (Station B—i) do not completely reflect the effects of
46
-------
TAZLE VUl
SUMMARY OP WASTE INPUT (LBS/DAY) TO PERDIDO BAY
PERDIDO BAY WATER QUALITY STUDY
JUNE 1972
Residue Nitrosenona CnI*po4mds—N
RODS TOC Total NPLT Vol NFLT Lignin TKN NH3 NO2—NO Tota.1 Total P—P
Waste Source Load* 2 Load 2 Load 2 Load 2 Load 2 Load 2 Load I Load 2 Load I Load I
Eleven Mile Creek
St. Regis Paper Co. 4,100 69 29,100 86 5,720 26 2,860 24 17,400 97 950 66 240 58 134 50 1,084 63 220 48
Lincoln Park
S bdjyjsjon 17 c i 11 <1 16 <1 12 <1 —— —— 14 1 13 3 —— —— 14 1 8 2
! aYou Marcus
May Fair Subdivision — —— 25
-------
TABLE IX
P DIDO BAY AND TRIBUTARY TER ( JALITY DATA SUMM&RY
PERDIDO BAT WAT ( JALITY SURVEY
June, 1972
EPA Residue
Station Temp DO BOD5 Color Lignin TEN NR3—N N02-4103—N Total P TOC Conduct. Chlorides COD Total Vol.
No. p41 (°C) (mg/i) (mg/i) (Pt—Co. Units) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i) (unhos/cci) (mg/i) (mg/i) NF’LT NFLT
c—l 7.7 32 —— 19 1028 70 — — — —— 116 —— — 340 31 10
I—2 7.7 32 —— 16 878 63 — — — — 106 — —— 299 28 10
il —3 7.6 28 —- 13 689 49 — — — — 73 — — 234 28 12
(—4 7.5 28 —— 6.5 588 38 1.8 0.53 0.57 0.46 63 2520 — — 14 7
B—i 6.4 25.5 4.7 1.2 36 0.4 0.45 0.03 0.76 0.57 4 170 7.6 — 8 5
PR—i 7.0 25 8.3 1.0 33 0.4 0.19 0.02 0.08 0.05 2.9 88 — <50 10 5
P—i 7.4 27.7 7.1 2.0 29 0.6 0.21 0.02 cO.Oi 0.02 4 10,600 — —— 11 <5
P—2 7.6 27.5 6.4 1.0 67 2.7 0.21 0.04 0.03 0.05 8 17,400 6,050 — — ——
P—3 .7.9 27.5 6.8 — 55 i.7 0.33 <0.01 0.Oi 0.05 7 18,000 — — — ——
P- .4 8.0 27.4 6.9 —— 46 1.4 0.22 <0.01 0.01 0.03 7 17,500 — — — —
P—5 8.1 27.3 6.9 1.5 44 1.4 0.20 <0.02 0.02 0.04 7 19,300 6,610 — — —
P.6 8.i 27.4 6.6 — 47 1.4 0.18 <0.Oi 0.01 0.05 7 19,100 — —— — —_
P—7 8.1 27.4 6.8 1.4 44 1.2 0.23 <0.01 0.02 0.04 6 19,400 —— —— — ——
P—8 8.2 27.3 6.8 — 41 1.1 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.04 6 20,300 — — — ——
P—9 8.1 27.5 7.1 1.0 37 i.0 0.17 0.02 <0.01 0.03 7 21,200 6,980 —— —— —
P—iD 8.1 27.2 6.5 — 38 i.l 0.23 0.01 <0.01 0.04 6 20,200 — —— —— ——
P—il 8.2 27.6 6.9 — 34 0.9 0.23 0.02 0.01 0.03 5 21,600 — —— — —
P—i2 8.4 27.5 7.4 1.4 32 0.9 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.02 5 22,500 — — —— ——
P—13 8.5 27.6 7.3 — 31 0.9 0.19 0.Oi O.Oi 0.03 5 23,300 —— —— —— ——
P—14 8.5 27.6 7.0 i.1 26 0.8 0.23 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 5 24,000 — —— — ——
P—l5 8.5 27.5 7.1 — 25 0.6 0.21 0.01 <0.01 0.02 4 26,000 — — —— ——
P—16 8.5 27.5 7.0 — 21 0.4 0.16 <0.01 cO.01 0.02 4 27,500 — —— —— —
-------
municipal discharges on water quality in the creek (Table IX). At
this station, the average BOD5 (1.2 mg/i) was almost at background
levels; TOC (4 mg/i) and suspended solids (8 mg/i) were low; color
(36 Pt.—Co. units) was about the same level as the color in the Perdido
River at Florida Highway 184. Only total nitrogen (1.21 mg/i), phosphorus
(0.57 mg/i), and bacteriological data (total and fecal coliform
densities of 29,000 and 2,300/100 ml, respectively) reflect upscream
discharges. The dissolved oxygen concentrations averaged 4.7 mg/l, which
is in compliance with the water quality criteria associated with Florida’s
Class Ill water use classification of this stream.
PERDIDO BAY
General
To evaluate water quality in Perdido Bay, 15 locations were sampled
for five days (Table X, Figure 4). Elevenmile Creek was the major source
of waste input into the bay; Perdido River was the second largest con-
tributor; Bayou Marcus Creek was the third greatest source.
Current Movement
A limited examination of the chloride profiles in the estuary pro-
vided information on water movement and waste distribution. The only
factors which cause variations in chloride concentration at a particular
point are turbulent diffusion due to tidal currents and advection
caused by freshwater inf low, principally from the Perdido River. The
volume of freshwater inflow, as well as the physical configuration
of the bay, affects the flushing rate of wastes from Perdido Bay.
49
-------
TABLE X
PERDIDO BAY STATION LOCATIONS
Location
Number Location Description
P2 0.25 Nautical Miles South of Eleven Mile Creek
P3 0.5 Nautical Miles East of P2
p5 1.0 Nautical Miles South of Eleven Mile Creek
P4 0.5 Nautical Mile West of PS
P6 0.75 Nautical Miles East of PS
P9 1.75 Nautical Miles South of Eleven Mile Creek
P8 0.75 Nautical Miles West of P9
plO 0.75 Nautical Miles East of P9
P7 0.5 Nautical Mile West of Bayou Marcus
P11 0.7 Nautical Mile Southwest of P9
P12 0.75 Nautical Mile Westerly of P11 in Middle of Bay
P13 1.5 Nautical Miles Westerly of P11 in Middle of Bay
P14 At US 98 Bridge - Middle of Bay
P15 1 Nile Southerly of US 98 Bridge in Middle of Bay
P16 2 Miles Southerly of US 98 Bridge in Middle of Bay
NOTE: Compass Directions are Magnetic
SO
-------
flGURE 4
SCALt IN MILES
I 0 7
U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RCGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATI4(NS GEORGIA
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
3
INSERT
uS P SI ’o I
ALABAMA
BALDWIN
Co.
Oe SIi P1
FLORtDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
N
51
-------
The predominant flooding current patterns in Perdido Bay (Figure 5)
were derived from chloride analyses and/or conductivity measurements
at the bay water quality sampling stations. Water from the Perdido
River disperses primarily in a southerly direction along the western
shore of the bay; some flow moves easterly along the northern portion
of the bay and mixes with the water from Elevenmile Creek. Saline
water flows northeasterly from the lower bay into the upper bay where
it disperses in a northerly and easterly direction.
The 1969 FWPCA current movement study was more detailed than the
1972 study. Results of the 1969 study indicated that currents in the
upper portion of the Bay were weak and circulation was poor. The pre-
dominant current pattern during both flood and ebb tides indicated
that circulation was counterclockwise in the northern portion of the bay
with freshwater flowing south along the Alabama shore of the bay and
saline water advancing along the Florida shore. The 1969 study also
included dye investigations which showed that flow from Elevenmile
Creek was carried into Perdido River and along the Alabama shore.
Dissolved Oxygen
Average dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations ranged from 6.4 mg/i
to 7.4 mg/i at stations located in the bay and lower Perdido River
(Table IX). Water quality standards require 4 mg/i in the bay and 5 mg/i
in the river. The lower DO values observed In the northeast quadrant of
the upper bay somewhat reflected the waste flows from Elevenmile Creek.
This area also had the highest theoretical oxygen demand (TOD — Table XI).
52
-------
FLOODING CURRENT PATTERN AT MID - DEPTH
0
FIGURE 5
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
Rivar
ALABAMA
Lillian
Mill view
BALDWIN CO.
Mon / 8a you
Double Pt.
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
N
SCALE IN MILES
2
53
-------
TABLE XI
AVERAGE DO-BOD-TOD IN PERDIDO BAY
PERDIDO BAY WATER QUALITY SURVEY
June 1972
DO BOD TOD*
Station (mg/i) (mg/i) (mg/i)
P—i 7.1 2.0 11.6
2 6.4 1.0 22.3
3 6.8 ——— 20.2
4 6.9 ——— 19.7
5 6.9 1.5 19.6
6 6.6 ——— 19.5
7 6.8 1.4 17.1
8 6.8 ——— 17.0
9 7.1 1.0 19.5
10 6.5 ——— 17.1
11 6.9 ——— 14.4
12 7.4 1.4 14.2
13 7.3 ——— 14.2
14 7.0 1.1 14.4
15 7.1 ——— 11.6
16 7.0 ——— 11.4
* TOD = 2.67 (TOC) + 4.57 (TKN) (1)
where:
TOD = theoretical oxygen demand
TOC = total organic carbon
TKN = total Kjeldahl nitrogen
NOTE: This relationship presumes that all of the carbon will
eventually be oxidized to carbon dioxide and all of the
unstabilized nitrogen to nitrates. The total organic
carbon (TOC) is a direct measure of organic carbon, and
each pound of TOC discharged required 2.67 pounds of
oxygen during stabilization to carbon dioxide. Total
Kjeldahi nitrogen (TKN) is the sum of the total unsatis-
fied nitrogen as both nitrogen and ammonia. Each pound
of this material requires 4.57 pounds of oxygen during
stabilization to nitrates.
54
-------
The DO and TOD izmnedi.ately upstream from the mouth of Elevenmile Creek
were 0.9 mg/i and 176 mg/i, respectively. The DO and TOD in Bayou
Marcus Creek were 4.7 mg/i and 12.7 mg/i, respectively. in the Perdido
River upstream from the mouth, DO and TOD values were 7.1 and 11.6 mg/i,
respectively. Flows from Bayou Marcus Creek and Perdido River apparently
did not depress DO concentrations in the bay.
During the September 1969 survey, average surface DO concentrations
ranged from 7.0 mg/i to 6.0 mg/i in most of the bay and lower Perdido
River. Only near the mouth of Elevenmile Creek were the surface DO
concentrations less than 4 mg/i. The slightly higher DO concentrations
measured in 1969 were probably a result of analyzing aerated surface
samples. In 1972, DO samples were collected at 5 feet in water equal
to or greater than ten feet deep or at mid-depth in water less than
10 feet deep. In general, the DO in the bay has not changed signif 1—
cant].y in the last three years.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Five—day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ) concentrations (1.0-1.5
mg/i) at six bay locations reflected background conditions —- unpolluted
or very low pollution level conditions. One of the lowest BOB 5 con-
centrations (1 mg/i) found during the survey was measured near the mouth
of Elevenmile Creek (Station P—2). However, the TOD at Station P—2 was
22.3 mg/l, reflecting the waste flow from Elevenmile Creek. The BOD 5
measured in the mouth of Perdido River was 2 mg/i —— the highest measure-
ment in the bay area except for Elevenmile Creek. Perdido River contributed
55
-------
26 percent of the BOD 5 measured entering the bay (Table VIII).
Bac teriolpgical
Perdido Bay, Perdido River, Elevenmile Creek, and Bayou Marcus
Creek were sampled to determine bacteriological water quality. A
summary of the coliform bacteria data is contained in Table XII.
Figure 6 shows the total coliform distribution observed in Perdido
Bay during the study period. There is a gradual decrease in mean total
coliform densities from the upper portion to the lower portion of the
bay. The highest mean total coliform density measured (490/100 ml)
was near the mouth of Elevenmile Creek (Station P—2). The higher total
coliform densities observed at this station reflected the influence of
the waste in Elevenmile Creek. The mean total coliform density of
310/100 ml observed at Station P—4 is probably due to the Perdido
River discharge. The Impact of the Bayou Marcus discharge on the
bacteriological quality of Perdido Bay was not apparent at Station
P—7, the station closest to the mouth of the bayou. The mean total
coliform density at this station was 120/100 ml.
Only at Station P—2 did the total coliform density exceed Florida’s
Class III water quality bacterial criteria for body contact activities.
The coliform criteria requirement specifies that the monthly average not
exceed 1,000/100 ml and that individual daily sample not exceed
2,400/100 ml. The arithmetic average for station P—2 was 1,300/100 ml;
the maximum individual daily measurement was 4,300/100 ml.
The total coliform limit for shellfish harvesting of 70/100 ml
as set by the National Shellfish Sanitation Program was not met in the
upper portion of the bay.
56
-------
TABLE X II
PERDIDO BAY AND TRIBUThRY BACTERIOLOCICAL DATA SUI* ARY
JUNE 1972
EPA Total Coliforin Bacteria/lOO ml Fecal Coliforin Bacteria/l00 ml
Sta. Log Log No. of
No. Maximum Minimum Mean Maximum Minimum Mean Si3inples
P-I 1,100 20 450 290 70 <20 26 23 8
P-2 4,300 60 1,300 490 50 <20 26 24 5
p-3 1,700 50 540 270 20 <20 20 20 5
P-4 1,300 70 550 310 80 <20 32 26 5
P-5 790 140 400 330 70 <20 33 27 4
P-6 1,300 <20 470 200 20 <20 20 20 5
p 7 330 40 170 120 20 <20 20 20 5
P-8 490 50 170 120 20 <20 20 20 5
P-9 490 <20 180 120 110 <20 44 34 5
p-b 330 50 210 180 20 <20 20 20 5
p-U. 700 <20 180 59 170 <20 50 31 5
P-12 80 20 44 35 20 <20 20 20 5
P-13 790 <20 190 59 220 <20 60 32 5
P-14 330 20 110 68 170 <20 50 31 5
P-l5 130 <20 54 38 50 <20 26 24 5
P-16 330 <20 82 35 130 <20 42 29 5
PR-b 4,900 40 2,000 970 790 40 180 110 7
B-I 350,000 4,900 77,000 29,000 170,000 330 25,000 2,300 7
EM-I 92,000 4,900 25,000 15,000 700 50 310 240 7
EM-2 22,000 2,000 9,300 7,000 1,700 20 470 230 7
EM-3 92,000 330 18,000 5.300 2,800 20 660 310 7
EM-4 92,000 1,300 31,000 11,000 330 50 130 110 8
57
-------
TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA DISTRIBUTION
FIGURE 6
BALDWIN Co.
US. Hlghwoy 98
A Ofl4#,/ &770u
N
SCALE IN MILES
0
NOTE: Bactsrio Distribution- Logarithmic M•an MPN./IOOmI.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
V —P•rd/de ,Wvr
I cc
ALABAMA
Lillion
4200 /
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA Co.
58
-------
Fecal coliform densities were generally low throughout the bay.
All bay stations had mean fecal coliforin densities of less than 35/100
ml. The fecal coliform bacteria were within Alabama’s specific Water
Quality Criteria for Swimming and Other Whole Body Water—Contact Sports
(Table III).
Lignin—like Compounds and Color
Lignin—like compounds are a major constituent of paper mill wastes.
During the survey, the discharge of lignin—like compounds from the
St. Regis paper mill averaged 17,400 pounds per day. The mill discharge
represents 97 percent of the total lignin—like compounds measured in
the discharge into the bay. Concentrations of lignin—like compounds
were determined in Perdido Bay to trace the waste distribution from
Elevenmile Creek (Table IX).
Lignin—like compounds were diluted from 38 mg/i in Elevenmile
Creek near the mouth (Station EM—4) to 2.7 mg/i in samples collected
in Perdido Bay 0.25 mile south of Elevenmile Creek (Station P—2).
Figure 7 shows that:
• Eleveninile Creek was the primary source of lignin in the bay.
e Concentrations decrease progressively toward the mouth of
the bay.
• Concentrations are above background (0.4 mg/i) to a point
2 miles south of U. S. Highway 98 bridge (Station 16).
Lignin—like compounds impart a dark color to paper processing
waste effluents (color in St. Regis’ effluent was 1,100 Pt.—Co. units).
Color determinations on the same samples analyzed for lignin—like
59
-------
LIGNIN LIKE COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATIONS
FIGURE 7
BALDWIN Co.
. !• Highway 98
I onu/ 8ej-ou
±
SCALE IN MILES
0
NOTE: Lignin- mg/I
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
Prd/do R/vr
ALABAMA
1.3
Lillian
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA Co.
‘rth
2
60
-------
compounds indicated a similar distribution of values, ranging from 67
Pt.—Co. units near the mouth of Elevenmile Creek to 21 units at Station
P—16 in the lower bay (Figure 8). All color concentrations in Perdido
Bay north of Double Point were above the background level of 33 units
measured in the Perdido River at the control station PR—i.
Florida and Alabama’s water quality criteria stipulate that color
not be a nuisance and that it not interfere with normal assigned water
uses. “Nuisance” and “assigned water uses” are not defined and it can’t
be stated whether or not the color levels measured exceeded adopted
water quality criteria.
In 1969, higher lignin—like compound concentrations (9.7 mg/i)
were measured in the bay near the mouth of Elevenmile Creek. The con-
centrations decreased from the upper to lower portion of the bay
averaging 1 mg/i near the U. S. Highway 98 bridge. Color concentrations
in 1969 were also slightly higher (27—100 units) throughout the bay.
Nitrogen
Elevenmile Creek contributed 67 percent of the total Kje].dahl nitrogen
(TKN), 61 percent of the annnonia nitrogen, and 50 percent of the measured
nitrate—nitrite nitrogen entering the bay (Table VIII). The maximum TKN
concentrations (0.2—0.3 mg/i) were in the north and northeast sections
of the bay, reflecting the waste in the Eievenmile Creek discharge
(Figure 9). Saufley Field also discharges into the northeast section
of the bay, but the waste flow (0.16 MCD) had a negligible measurable
effect on water quality in the bay. This northeast area of the bay was
similarly affected in 1969; however, the concentrations were about 0.7 mg/i.
61
-------
BALDWIN CO.
SCALE IN MILES
FIGURE 8
2
NOTE: Color as - Pt. Co. Units
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
COLOR CONCENTRATIONS
Pirdido R4’ir
ALABAMA
Lillian
Doubts Pt.
U.S. Highway 98
4ionu I 8oyou
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
Ba,
±
0
62
-------
.L$. Hig oy e
AIc,,uv/ 8oyou
flGURE 9
4m
SCALE IN MILES
0
2
NOTE. TKN-mg/I
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS
P.rd/do Rivar
,1)
ALABAMA
LilliOn
BALDWIN Co.
Doub s Pt.
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
63
-------
TKN concentrations exceeding 0.23 mg/i were measured near Bayou Marcus
Creek. (Bayou Marcus contributed 12 percent of the TKN, 30 percent of
the ammonia, and one percent of the measured nitrite—nitrate nitrogen).
In 1969, the TKN concentrations measured at this station were about 0.3 mg/i.
TKN concentrations of 0.22 mg/i hugging the western shore of
upper Perdido Bay reflected the 20 percent measured nitrogen contribution
from the Perdido River. In 1969, the lowest concentrations found in the
bay (0.16—0.20 mg/i) were in this area.
The highest average ammonia and nitrite—nitrate concentrations of
0.04 and 0.03 mg/i, respectively, were measured in Perdido Bay near
the mouth of Eievenmile Creek (Station P—2). These concentrations
result from the waste flow from Eleveninile Creek. In the remainder of
the bay, concentrations of both parameters varied between 0.02 and <0.01
mg/i and no distribution pattern was detected. In 1969, ammonia nitrogen
concentrations ranged from 0.04 mg/i near the mouth of Elevenmile Creek
to 0.02 mg/i at the U. S. Highway 98 bridge. Nitrite—nitrate concen-
trations in 1969 were about the same as in 1972.
The nitrogen concentrations in the upper reaches of the bay have
not attained nuisance levels; however, if nitrogen loads continue to
be discharged at the present rates, over—enrichment could occur.
Total Phosphorus
Total phosphorus concentrations of 0.05 mg/i measured in the north-
east section of the bay reflected St. Regis’ discharge of 48 percent
(220 pounds per day) of the total measured phosphorus input into the bay.
64
-------
This was the highest concentration measured in the bay and the affected
area extended from Elevenmile Creek to within 1/2 mile of Bayou Marcus
Creek (Figure 10). Bay concentrations diminished gradually from the
upper to lower portion of the bay, reaching background levels (0.02 mg/i)
near the U. S. Highway 98 bridge.
The four municipal wastewater treatment plants which discharge
into Bayou Marcus Creek contributed 31 percent (151 pounds per day) of
the total phosphorus input into the bay. This contribution is reflected
in the phosphorus content (0.04 to 0.05 mg/i) observed near the mouth
of Bayou Marcus Creek.
In 1969, the wastewater treatment plants discharging into Bayou
Marcus Creek contributed 55 percent (106 pounds per day) of the total
phosphorus; St. Regis contributed 45 percent (87 pounds per day). Be-
cause of the significantly greater flow from Elevenmile Creek, the
highest phosphorus concentrations were measured in this area. In 1972,
total phosphorus concentrations in the immediate vicinity of Elevenmile
and Bayou Marcus Creeks were about the same as values observed in 1969,
but the affected areas were generally smaller.
During the 1972 survey, Perdido River contributed 17 percent (77
pounds per day) of the total phosphorus measured in discharges into the
bay. Because of the low levels of phosphorus concentrations in the
river, the effects of this discharge on the bay are not readily apparent.
The concentration near the mouth of the river was 0.02 mg/i which in-
dicates that the slightly greater concentrations observed in the bay
were not due to the contribution of phosphorus from the river.
65
-------
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS CONCENTRATIONS
FIGURE 10
BALDWIN Co.
y.S. P4ghway 96
i ##/ Doyou
SCALE IN MILES
NOTE: Total Phospnorous-mg/l as P
U. S. ENVIRON MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
P.rd/o’o Rsvr
ALABAMA
Lillion
4!
- Doubli Pt
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
±
0
I -
2
66
-------
Although biological nuisances have been observed in areas with
total phosphorus concentrations of 0.05 mg/i (3), none were observed
during this study. However, iE discharges from the St. Regis and
the municipal wastewater treatment plants continue at the present rate,
nuisance conditions could evolve.
Total Organic Carbon
Eighty—six percent of the measured total organic carbon (TOC) input
into Perdido Bay was discharged by the paper mill operated by the
St. Regis Paper Company. Results of the TOC in the paper mill discharge
are reflected by the 8 mg/l concentration observed at Station P—2. Con-
centrations decreased progressively down the bay (Figure 11); the
concentration at the U. S. 98 bridge was 5 mg/i. The 13 percent input
from Perdido River and the one percent contributed from Bayou Marcus
Creek was not apparent in the bay. In 1969, the TOC concentrations
ranged from 13 mg/i at the mouths of Elevenmile and Bayou Marcus Creeks
to 4 mg/i near the U. S. Highway 98 bridge.
Foam
During the entire survey period, which included some very windy
days (gusts up to 35 mph), no foam was sighted on the bay, along its
shores, in the mouths of Eievenmile and Bayou Marcus Creeks or the
Perdido River. The only foam seen was immediately downstream from the
paper mill at Kings Field Road. Foam was not observed at any of the
Elevenmile Creek sampling stations.
67
-------
FIGURE II
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ALABAMA
LiIIiO .
ItS. Highwoy 18
M / Dcyot.
BALDWIN Co.
CONCENTRATIONS
SCALE IN MILES
0
I 2
NOTE: Told O gonic Corbon - mg/I
1
U.I ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTiON AGENCY
REGION IZ
PERDIDO BAY
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
JUNE, 1972
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS GEORGIA
—p r ob rn w
DoubN Pt.
FLORIDA
ESCAMBIA CO.
N
68
-------
REFERENCES
1. Effects of Pollution on Water Quality, Perdido River and Bay,
Alabama and Florida , U. S. Department of the Interior, Federal
Water Pollution Control Administration, Southeast Water Laboratory,
Athens, Georgia, January 1970.
2. Supplement to Effects of Pollution on Water Quality, Perdido
River and Bay, Alabama and Florida , Environmental Protection
Agency, Southeast Water Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, February 1971.
3. The Practice of Water Pollution Biology , U. S. Department of the
Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration,
Washington, D. C., September 1969.
69
-------
APPENDICES
-------
APPENDIX A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND PROJECT PERSONNEL
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND PROJECT PERSONNEL
The cooperation and resources extended to the Environmental
Protection Agency by employees of the Florida State Board of Health.
Appreciation is also extended to each of the municipal and industrial
dischargers which assisted In sampling and/or flow measuring of their
wastewater treatment plants.
EPA Field Personnel
Dick Baird — Sanitary Engineer
Tom Bennett - Chemist
Jerry Burger — Engineering Aide
Bobby Carroll — Microbiologist
Ralph Gentry — Microbiologist
Steve Hall — Sanitary Engineer
Wade Knight — Chemist
Pat Lawless — Chemist
Torn Sack — Physical Science Technician
Eddie Shollenberger — Engineering Technician
Ron Weldon — Biologist
-------
APPENDIX B
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYTICAL METhODS
-------
SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Municipal Waste Discharges
Twenty—four hourly composite samples using Serco automatic samplers
(Sigmamotor or Protech used at a few plants) were collected at the
influent and effluent (effluent prior to chlorination) of each waste—
water treatment plant for pH, BOD 5 , TOC, COD, total suspended solids,
total volatile suspended solids, nitrogen series, and total phosphorus
analyses. Grab samples for total and fecal coliforni analyses were
collected hourly for 12 hours and composited every three hours. Chlorine
residual was measured in the field; pH was measured in the field
laboratory. Flows were determined by plant equipment and/or records
or EPA equipment.
Industrial Waste Discharges
St. Regis Paper Company —— Twenty—four hourly composite samples were
collected at the influent and effluent of the company’s wastewater
treatment plant for seven days. Company automatic samplers (paddle—
wheel type) were used and were refrigerated. Analyses required were
pH, temperature, BOD5, TOC, COD, total suspended solids, total volatile
suspended solids, lignin—like compounds, color, nitrogen series, and
total phosphorus. Total and fecal coliform samples were collected by
grabbing. All samples were refrigerated during transport to the field
laboratory. Temperatures were measured in the field; pH was measured
in the field laboratory. Flows were measured with company Parshall
-------
flumes. (A complete description of the study procedures is included
in the separate report evaluating St. Regis’ treatment system.)
Newjort Division, Tenneco Chemicals, Inc . —— One 24—hour composite
sample was collected at the effluent from the wastewater treatment
system with a Serco automatic sampler for the following analyses:
pH, BOD 5 , COD, total suspended solids, total volatile suspended solids,
total solids, total dissolved solids and total phosphorus. Samples
for oil and grease, phenols, and organic scan analyses were hand
grabbed. Flow was determined by company equipment.
The composite sample was refrigerated while being collected; all
samples were refrigerated while transported to the field laboratory.
Baldwin Pole and Piling Company -— Grab samples for the following
analyses were collected:
• B aD 5 , COD, total solids, total suspended solids,
total volatile solids, color — one grab.
• Phenols —— one grab.
• Organic scan —— one grab.
Waste flow was estimated by the company.
Perdido Bay and Tributary Streams
Fifteen bay and seven tributary stations were grab sampled once
daily for five and seven consecutive days, respectively. Sampling
times were varied to account for diurnal fluctuations. A tide gage
was installed near the mouth of Perdido River to record tidal variations.
Tributary stations were sampled concurrently with St. Regis sampling;
-------
bay stations were sampled for five days.
The following analyses were run on the samples from all stations:
pH, temperature, BOD5, TOC, color, lignin—like compounds, dissolved
oxygen, and total and fecal coliforin. Total suspended solids and
total volatile suspended solids were run on tributary streams only;
COD was run on only freshwater samples. Nitrogen series, total P,
and conductivity were run on all the bay stations, the two Perdido
River stations and the stations at the mouths of Elevenmile and Bayou
Marcus Creeks. Chlorides were run on the Bayou Marcus Creek and three
bay stations.
All samples except those for coliform analyses were collected at
mid—depth in water less than 10 feet deep and at 5 feet in water greater
than 10 feet deep. Samples for coliform analyses were collected at
the surface. A DO can sampler was used when sampling from a bridge for
samples for chemical analyses; samples for total and fecal coliform
analyses were collected by tying a string to a sterile “Bacti” bottle
and lowering it into the water. A Kemmerer sampler was used to collect
chemistry samples when sampling from a boat; colifortu samples were
collected by hand—dipping the sterile “Bacti” bottle.
Temperature was measured at time of sample collection; pH was
measured in the field laboratory. Dissolved oxygen samples were fixed
Immediately after collection by adding manganous sulfate and alkali
azide reagent. All samples were refrigerated upon collection and kept
cool while being transported to the field laboratory.
The 15 Perdido Bay stations were located by first establishing a
base line on a magnetic south heading from the mouth of Elevenmile
-------
Creek. This was done by running the boat south at a constant speed to
determine the time from the mouth to the opposite shore — a known
distance. The base line buoys were placed using this calculated
velocity and the location description (Table X ); the remaining buoys
were then located with this base line as a reference.
ANALYTICAL METhODS
The following analytical methods were used by EPA personnel:
Parameter Method Reference
Biochemical Oxygen Demand Winkler DO, 5—day 1,2
Chemical Oxygen Demand Acid—dichromate Oxidation 2
Total Organic Carbon Carbon Analyzer 2
Suspended Solids Gravimetric 1
Color Visual Against Co.—Pt. Standard 1
Lignin—like Compounds Tungato—molybdo—phosphoric Acid 1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Automated Phenolate Method 2
Ammonia Automated Phenolate Method 2
Nitrate—Nitrite Copper—cadmium Reduction, Automated 2
Phosphorus Ascorbic Acid Method 2
Settleable Solids Volumetric 1
Dissolved Oxygen Winkler 1
Conductivity Conductivity Bridge 1
Chlorides Automated Ferricyanide 2
Oil & Grease Solvent Extraction 1
Phenols 4—Aminoantipyrine 1
Total Solids Gravimetric, 105°C 1
Dissolved Solids Difference between Total and
Suspended Solids
-------
Parameter Method Reference
pH Electronietric 1
Total Coliform NPN 1
Fecal Coliform MPN 1
Organic Scan SEWL
1. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th
Edition, 1971.
2. EPA Manual of Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes,
1971.
-------
APPENDIX C
SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENSU GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
A(,EriCY
PRIMARY sTATION SECONDARY SECONDARY STATION LOCAIION STATE MINOR BASIN
1113S000
640018 P—ui F—u33—A26 PERDI’iU RIVER AT MOUTH FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640084 p—os F0J3A28 PLRUIUO dAY-. S NAU .P4I S 11 141 C FLORIDA PEROIDO RIVER BASIN
b’.oobl i —0J F—033—A29 PEWDIUO BAY—U.S NAU. 14 1 E OF P—02 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017000 P—U’. A—003—3 2 PERDIDO UMY-i).b NAU.MI.W OF P—OS ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017u 03 P—OS 4—003—33 PEWD [ liO BAY—i NAU.Mi. 5 ii 141 CR ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASiN
640090 P—Gb F—033—430 PIRuIDO BAY—.75 N*U.MI E UF P—OS FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
6 ’ .0093 i —01 F—033—431 P RUIOO t AY—.S NAU MI 8 BuYOU MA FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017006 P—Ud A—U0J—34 PEROIOO AY—.7S NAU 141 w OF P—09 ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640096 P—09 F—033—AJ2 PE4OIiJO BUY—i .75 NAd MI S ilMi C FLORIDA PEROIDO RIVER BASIN
64 0o 99 P—lU F—033-AJ3 P DIDO BAY—. 15 NAU MI L )F P-09 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
6’.0102 P—li F—043—A34 PEROUt) BAY—.? NAiJ MI SB OF P—09 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
64 0 1u5 —12 F—033—A3 5 PERDIDO jAY— .15 NAU MI B OF P—il FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017009 P—li 4—003—35 PERDIDU bAYi.5 NAU MI B OF P—li ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
u170 12 i—i 4 A—00336 PERDIDO BAY—US 98 BRIDGE—MIDDLE ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640108 P—1 F—033—Ai6 PERUIDO BAY—i MI S OF US 98 BR. FLORIDA PEROIDO RIVER BASIN
640111 P—lb F—)33—A37 PERDIDO BAY—2 MI s OF US 98 BR 0 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIvER BASIN
640075 1P—01 F—033—A 5 PERDIuO r IVER AT FLA. IIBY. lB4 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640J81 B—UI F—O33—A 7 BAYOU MA, CUS CREEK AT MOUTH FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640063 IM—Ol F—u33—A 1 ELEVEhi MILE C . AT ST. RI. 2914 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
b4Oubb 114—02 F—033—A22 LEV .N MILE C c. Al US 90A—SR 10 FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640069 €M— 3 F—033—A23 LLEVEN MILE C. . AT US 90—SR bA FLORIDA PEROIOO RIVER BASIN
640072 114—04 F—u33—A24 ELIVEN MILE CR. AT MOUTH FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640942 SR-03 F—033—A14 ST. REGIS PAPER CO—PRIMRY PD INF FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
e400 54 SR—U i F—033—AlB ST. REGIS PAPER CO.FINAL EFF, FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640000 LP-U1 F—033—A LINCOLN PAKIc STP INFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640003 t..P-02 F—033—Ai LiNCOLN PARIS SIP EFFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640006 MA—UI F—033—A2 MAYFAIR STP INFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640009 144—02 F—033— 43 MAYFAIR SIP &FLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640012 MO—Ui F—033—aA MOI1TCLA1R SIP INFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIOO RIVER BASIN
64001S 140—02 F—033—#S MONTCLAIR SIP EFFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640018 5—01 F—033—A6 SAUFLEY FIELD SIP INFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640021 —O2 F—033—A7 SAUFLEY FIELO SIP EFFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640u24 FM—O1 F—O33—Ad FAIRBAY MOBILE HOME COURT INF. FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
640027 FM—02 F— 033—A9 FAIRWAY MOBILE ROME COURT EFF. FLORIDA PERDIOO RIVER BASIN
640030 AV—0l F—033—A1O AVONOALE SIP IPIFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASiN
640033 AV—02 F—0i3—Ai1 AVONDALE STP EFFLUENT FLORIDA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017u1 5 AT—Ol A—053—2i AIMORE STP INFLUENT ALABA I4A PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017018 41—02 4—053—24 ATMORE SIP EFFLUENT ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017021 FO—uL 4—003—37 FOLEY SIP INFLUENT ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
011024 FO—02 A— 003—J8 FOLEY SIP EFFLUENT ALABAMA PEROIDO RIVER BASIN
017027 P0—01 A—003—39 ROBERISDALE SIP INFLUENI ALAGAMA PERDIOO RIVER BASIN
011030 P0—02 A—003—4 0 ROBERISDALE SIP EFFLUENT ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017036 TE—Qi 4—003—42 IENNECO CHEMICALS INC. EFFLUENT ALABAMA PERDIDO RIVER BASIN
017039 84—01 4—003—43 BALDBIN POLE AND PILING CO. EFF. ALABAMA PERDIOO RIVER BASIN
017033 814—01 4—003—41 BAY MINUTE SIP EFFLUENT ALABAMA PEROIDO RIVER BASIN
-------
APPENDIX D
WATER QUALITY DATA
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCES
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972) —
00010 00403 (iOb lO 00625 00630 00665 00680
WATER LAB NP13—N TOT KJEL N021N03 PHOS—T T ORG C
TEMP PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT SU MG/I 140/L MG/L MG/I MG/I
AV—01 720607 1110 28.0
AV— J1 720607 1210 28.0
AV—01 720607 0800(C)720608 0800 6.5 17.20 27.000 0.010K 13.000
AV—02 720607 0 0O 6.5
AV—02 720607 1105 28.5
AV—02 72060? 1205 29.5
AV—02 720607 0800(C)720608 0800 7 . 11.80 16 500 0.020 13.300 40.0
31505 31615 00340 00530 00535 50050 50060
TOT COLI FEC CCLI COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT CHLORINE
MPN CONF MPNLCMED HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT PLOd TOT RESO
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME OEPTH /100ML /100ML MG/I MG/I M6/L MGD MG/I
AV—01 720607 0720(C)720607 0855 .llOEi09 46000000 0.460
AV—01 720607 1110 0.460
AV—U1 720607 1210 0.460
AV—O1 720607 1005(C)720607 1210 .220E.09 49000000 0.460
AV—01 720607 13’.5(C)720607 1455 240000001 24000000L 0.460
AV—01 720607 1700(C) 720607 1745 4000OO0L 24000000L 0.460
AV—01 720607 0800(C) 720608 0800 462 120 100 0.460
AV—02 720607 0725 0 460 1 0 50L
AV O2 720607 0800 0 460 lo5OL
AV U2 720607 0850 0.460 1 .50L
AV 02 720607 0725(C)720607 0850 200 200K 0 46O
AV 02 720607 1105 0 460 1 40
AV O2 720607 1205 0 460 1.40
AV 02 72060? 1025(C)720607 1205 800 200K 0.460
AW 02 720607 1400 0.460 1.30
AV 02 720607 1500 0 46O 1.00
AV O2 720607 1335(C)720607 1500 1100 200K 0.460
720607 1600 2300 200K 0.460 1.00
720607 0800C)720608 0800 232 70 64 0 46O
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680 31505
WATER LAB P 1113—N TOT KJEL P4026N03 PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI
TEMP P11 TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C MPN COP.F
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT SU MG/ I.. Hb/L MG/L MG/L MG/I /100ML
MA—Ol 720606 1000 29.0
MA—Ol 720606 1000(C)720606 1205 •L1OE.09
MA—Ol 720606 1300(C)720606 1500 .11OE.09
NA—Ol 720606 1600(C)720606 1800 79000000
MA—01 720607 0700(C)720607 0900 79000000
MA—Ol 720606 1400C )720607 1000 7.0 20.80 30.000 0.010 17.600 57.0
NA—02 720606 1000 27.5
MA—02 720606 1000(C)720606 1200 22000
MA—02 720606 1300(C)720606 isoo 2300
t4A—02 720606 1600(C)720606 1800 9200000
14A—02 720607 0700 (C) 720607 0900 24000001
MA—02 720606 1400(C)720607 1000 7.3 8.00 28.500 0.450 18.800 35.0
31615 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050 50060
FEC COLI BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT CHLORINE
MPNECMED 5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW TOT RESO
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH /100HL HG/I MG/L MG/L HG/L NOD MG/L
MA—Ol 720606 1000 0.085
MA—Ol 720606 1000(C)720606 1205 17000000 0.085
MA—Ol 720606 1300(C)720606 1500 23000000 0.085
MA—Ol 720606 1600(C)720606 1800 17000000 0.085
MA—Ol 720607 0700(C)720607 0900 14000000 0.085
MA—Ol 720606 1400(C)720607 1000 541 180 140 0.085
MA— 02 720606 1000 0.085 5.00
MA—02 720606 1110 0.085 4.00
MA—02 720606 1200 0.085 4.00
MA—02 720606 1000(C)720606 1200 4600 0.085
MA—02 720606 1300 0.085 4.00
MA—02 720606 1400 0.080 4.00
MA—02 720606 1500 0.109 4.50
MA—02 720606 1300(C)720606 1500 2300 0.094
NA—02 720606 1600 0.101 4.00
MA—02 720606 1700 0.094 0.15
MA—02 720606 1800 0.101 0.15
MA—02 720606 1600(C)72 0606 1800 3500000 0.099
MA— 02 720607 0700(C)720607 0900 920000 0.106
MA 02 720606 1400(C)72 06 07 1000 335 56 36 0.085
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENSU GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 31505
WATER LAB NH3-N TOT JEL N021N03 PHOS—T TOT COLI
TEMP PH TOTAL N P1—TOTAL P—WET MPN CONF
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT SU MG/I MG/I MG/L MG/I /10 0ML
FM—Cl 720605 1400 28.0
FM —01 720605 1515 28.0
FM —01 720605 1605 28.5
FM—01 720605 1400(C)720605 1605 92000000
FM —01 720605 1700 29.0
FM O1 720605 1800
FM—Ol 720605 1900 28.0
Fi4—01 720605 1400(C)720605 1900 7.4 17.20 27.000 0 .O10 ( 8.200 0 160E.09
F14—02 720605 1400 28.0
FM—02 720605 1520 28.0
FM —02 720605 1605 28.0
FM —02 720605 1400(C)720605 1b05 230000
F 14 —02 720605 1700 28.0
FM02 720605 1800
FM—02 720605 1900 27.0
FM—02 720605 1400(C)720605 1900 6.9 4.50 10.000 2.040 12.500 23000
31615 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050 50060
FEC COIl SOt) COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT CHLORINE
MPNECMED 5 DAY H! LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOU TOT RESO
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH /100ML. MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MGD IIG/L
FM—01 720605 1400 0.017
720605 1515 0 O17
FN—0l 720605 1605 00017
FN —01 720605 1400(C)720605 1605 17000000 0 017
FM —01 720605 1700 0 017
FM —01 720605 1300 0 O17
FM—Cl 720605 1900 0 017
FM —01 720605 1400(C)720605 1900 92000000 306.0 334 70 0.017
FM —02 720605 1400 0.017 1.50
FM— 02 720605 1520 0.017 1.30
FM02 720605 1605 0.017 1.30
FM —02 720605 1400(C)720605 1605 49000 0.017
FM —02 720605 1700 0.017 0.00
FM02 720605 1800 00017 0.70
FM —02 720605 1900 0 0l7 8.70
,t4 —0 720605 1400(C)720605 1900 7900 k70 o 82 31 2 0.017
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION LV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEOl GIA
PERDID) AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680 31505
WATER LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03 PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI
TEMP TOTAL N N-TOTAL P—WET C MPN CONF
STATION )ATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT SD MG/i MG/L MG/I MG/I MG/I / IOOML
MO—Ol 720605 1330 28.5 .240E.09L
MO—Ui 720605 1450 28.5 .240E.09t.
MO—Ol 720605 1550 28.5 35000000
MO—Ol 720606 0800 28.0 .1TOE.09
MO—Ui 720606 0900 28.0 .130E.09
MO—Oi 720605 i300(C)720606 1300 7.1 20,60 8.5O0 0.010K 16.700 150.0
M001 720606 1400 .130E. 09
140—02 720605 1330 2 i.5 200K
MO—02 720605 1450 28.5 200K
MO— 02 720605 15 0 28.5 200K
M002 720606 0800 28.0 50
140—02 72060b 0900 28.0 20K
140—02 720605 1300(CU20606 1300 7.3 16.00 19.800 0.090 16.000 48.0
140—02 720606 1400 20K
31615 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050 50060
FEC COLI 0D COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT CHLORI’ E
MPNECI4ED S DAY hi LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOd TOT RESD
STATION DATE TI4E DATE TIME DEPTH /100ML 14&/L MG/I MG/L MG/I NGD MG/L
1 40—01 720605 1330 54000000 0.580
140—01 720605 1450 35000000 0.580
140—01 720605 1550 35000000 0.580
140—01 720606 0800 17000000 0.580
MO—Ol 720606 0900 33000000 0.580
140—01 720605 1300(C)720606 1300 04.0 529 180 170 0.580
140—01 720606 1400 49000000 0.580
140—02 720605 1330 200K 0.490 1.50L
140—02 720605 1450 200K 0.350 3.50
140—02 720605 1550 200K 0.350 6.00
140—02 720606 0800 20K 0.360 6.00
140—02 720606 0900 20K 0.500 6.00
MO—02 720605 1300(C)720606 1300 62.0 199 44 44 0.580
140—02 720606 1400 2Oic 0.320 5.00
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PRJTECT ION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE. Mfl) ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
Pt.ROIDO AREA F1€LI3 STUDY (1972)
00010 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680
WATLI LA8 NH3N TOT KJEL NO2 N03 PKOS—T T ORG C
TEI4P TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPT 1 CENT SIJ MG/L MG/I M6/L MG /L MG/L
5—01 120601 1630 29.0
S—Ok 120608 1030 31.5
5—01 720608 1130 31.,
5—01 720608 1230 32.0
5—01 720607 1d .00(C1720608 1230 6.’. d.40 19.000 0.020 6.900
s—02 720607 1635 29.0
5—02 720608 0830 8.0
S—0 720608 0935 28.5
5—02 720608 1035 2 .0
5—02 720608 1135 29.5
S—02 720607 1400(C)720b08 1230 6.3 2.90 7.500 6.500 6.900 46.0
S—02 720608 1235
31505 .31615 00340 00530 00535 50050 50060
TOT CULl F C COLI COD RESIDUE P ES1DUE CONDUIT CHLORINE
MPI’I CONF MPNECMED HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW TOT RESD
STATION OATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH /100ML /100ML MG/I MG/I MG/I NGO MG/L
5—01 720607 1310(C)720607 1430 .240E+09 17000000 0.160
5—01 120607 1630 0.160
S—Ok 720607 1530(C)720607 1720 .140E.09 17000000 0.160
S—el 720608 1030 0.160
S—Ok 72060b 0825(C)120608 1030 .170E.09 •130E.09 0.160
5—01 720608 1130 0.160
s—Ok 720608 1230 0.160
5—01 720607 1400 (C}720608 1230 79000000 7900000 556 140 130 0.160
5—02 720607 1435 80 50 0.160 1.30
S—02 U0607 1530 0.160 1.30
5—02 720607 1635 0.160 1.00
5—02 720607 1725 0.160 1.20
S—02 720607 153OC720oo7 1725 20 20K 0.160
5—02 720608 0830 0.160 1.50
5—02 720608 0935 0.160 1.40
5-02 720608 1035 0.160 1.40
S—02 720608 0830CU20608 1035 110 201c 0.160
S—02 720608 1135 0.160 1.40
S—02 720607 1400(C)120608 1230 174 45 41 0.160
S—02 720608 1235 0.160 1.40
5—02 720608 1135(C)720608 1235 110 20 0.160
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PEROIOO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680 31505
LAB NH3.N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI
PH TOTAL Ii N—TOTAL P—WET C MPN CONF
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH SU MG/L MG/L MG/L NG/L )4G/L /100ML
LP—01 720611 1700(C)720612 1700 6.7 21.90 29.000 0.010K 13.000 150.0
LP—02 720611 1640 16000000
LP—02 720611 1715 24000000L
LP—02 720612 1700 16000000
LP—02 720611 1700(C)720612 1700 6.9 19,50 21.500 0.020 12.800 17.0
31615 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050
FEC COLI BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT
MPNECMED 5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH 100ML NG L MG/L MG/L MG/L MGO
LP—01 720611 1700C)720612 1700 420.0 1390 250 200 0.080
LP—02 720611 1640 1700000
LP—02 720611 1715 4300000
LP—02 720612 1700 9200000
LP—02 720611 1700(C)720612 1700 26.0 84 24 18 0.080
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
a —
00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680
LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—T I ORG C
PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
AT-Ol 720611 1330 6.9 20.00 28.000 o.oioic 15.500
AT—02 720610 1500(C)720611 1330 6.9 10.60 12.000 1.800 11.900 28.0
a —
00310 00340 00530 00535 50050
BOD COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT
5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L 1460
AT—Ol 720611 1330 230.0 422 120 88 0.547
AT —02 720610 1500(C)7206111 1330 37.0 52 28 5c( 0.547
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I V
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
— — — an e
00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680
LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—T T ORG C
PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH SU MG/L MG/L IIG/L P4G/L MG/L
720612 1200(C)720613 1100 7.3 12.70 19.000 0.010 11.600 24.0
fO—02 720612 1200(C)720613 1100 7,3 4.80 7.000 0.040 8.000 30.0
a a__a_a aaflaflaflflaaaaaflanaaaaeeae aaaaflaaennenaaaannaaa
00310 00340 00530 00535 50050
BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT
5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L MGD
FO—Ol 720612 1200(C)720613 1100 136.0 444 86 60 0.240
FO —02 720612 1200(C)720613 1100 23.0 134 17 14 0.240
-------
ENVIRONNENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I V
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS D]CVISXON ATHENSQ GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
CO Ceo eeoc 0 o0000000000000000000000000000 00 00 o00 0eoC 00000000 ccco00 000000 000 000 00000 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 0
00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680
LAB NH3°N TOT (JEL NO2 NO3 PHOSdT I ORG C
PH TOTAL N NeTOTAL Pc ET C
STATION DATE TINE DATE TINE DEPTH SU MG/L NG/L MG/L NG/L V4G/L
ROcOl 720612 1300(C)720613 1300 6o5 5 70 13 500 0 300 13 40O 92 0
R 0 o02 720612 1300(C)720613 1300 6 5 O 53 1 35O 0 950 2 O0 1000
0000000000000000 = 000 0SOC 00 00 0 00 000 00000 0 000000000 000 00000000000000000 000000000000 00000
00310 00340 00530 00535 50050
BOD COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT
5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOW
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH 14G/L MG/L NG/L MG/L MGD
RO eOl 720612 1L300(C) 7 2061 3 1300 261 0 495 100 2 Oo l O l
R0o02 720612 1300(C)720613 1300 13 0 60 14 10 0 101
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PEROIDO AREA FiELD STUDY (1972)
00080
COLOR
PT—co
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH UNITS
00403
LA
PH
SU
00610
NH3—N
TOTAL
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00630
P102&N03
N—TOTAL
MG/L
00665
PHOS—T
P—WET
MG/I.
00310
800
5 DAY
MG/I.
00340
COD
HI LEVEL
MG/I.
300
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
DATE TINE DEPTH MG/L
120
32730
PHENOLS
UG/L
59,0
00505 00515
RESIDUE RESIDUE
TOT VOL DISS—105
MG/L C NG/L
1230 420 1120
174
‘—a,
00550
OIL GRSE
TOTAL
MG/I.
190.0
BA—Ol 720609 1630
28 20 0.002 9100 140
120 110
BA—01 720609 1630
STAT ION
TE—Ol
TE—Ol
7.0
DATE
720610
720609
TINE
1330
1430(C)72O610 1330
00535
RESIDUE
VOL NFLT
MG /L
50050
CONDUIT
FLOW
NGO
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
88 0.156
515
STAT ION
BM-01
DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH
720609 1400(C)720610 1400
00403
00610
00625
00630
00665
00310
80D
00340
COD
00530
RESIDUE
00535
RESIDUE
50050
CONDUIT
LAB
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
S
DAY
HI
LEVEL
TOT NFLT
VOL NFLT
FLOW
PH
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
MG/I.
MG/L
MG/I.
NG/L
MGO
SU
NG/L
MG/I.
MG/L
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PRGTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENSo GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
C 0
32240 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050 32730
TANNIN BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT P €NOLS
LIGtdN S DAY PU LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOti
STATION DATE TD E DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L MOD UG/L
SR —03 720605 1415 26.300
SR O3 720606 08Q0 26 300 3750
Sw —03 720605 0830(C)720606 0800 88 223 O 879 220 150 26 300
S —O3 720606 1330 26.300
SR —03 720606 0800(C)720607 0735 270 170 26.500
SR —03 720607 0635(C)720607 0840 26.500
SR —03 720607 1125 26.500 1140
SR —u3 720607 0935(C)720607 1125 26.500
SR —03 720607 1230C)720607 1430 26.500
SR—03 720607 1530(C)720607 1730 26.500
SR—03 720608 0640 26.400
SR—03 720607 0735(C) 720608 0740 120 970 390 220 26 .4u0
SR—03 720608 0640(C)720608 0840 26.400
S —O3 720608 1030 625
SR—03 720608 0935(C) 720608 1125 26.400
SR— 03 720608 1250(C)720608 1440 26.400
SR— 03 720608 1535(C)720608 1735 26.400
SR—03 720608 0740(C)720609 0755 196.0 130 100 25.500
SR—03 720609 0835 25.100 870
SR—03 720610 0735 25.100 1130
SW—03 720609 0755(C)720610 0735 89 194.0 693 190 130 25 100
SR—03 720611 0645 26.400 740
SR—03 720610 0735C)720611 0645 235 0 200 150 26.400
SR—03 720611 0647(C)720611 0840 26.400
SR—03 720611 0940(C)720611 1140 26.400
SR —u3 720611 1410(C)720611 1610 26.400
SR—03 720611 1705(C)T20611 1800 26.400
SR—03 720611 0645(C)720612 0700 84 205.0 772 100 78 26.400
SR—03 720612 0701 26.400 650
SR—03 720614 0700(C)720615 0700 88 199.0 788 280 110 24.500
SR—03 720615 0700(C)720616 0700 78 217.0 775 270 140 25.900
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PNOTECJLON AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FiELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00080 00403 00665 00680 31505 31615
WATER COLOR LALI PHOS-T T ORG C TOT COIl FEC COLI
TEMP PT—CO PH P-WET C MPN CONE NPNECMED
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS SU MG/L t4G/L /100HL /IOOML
Sr —U3 720605 1415 36.0 490 20K
Sr —o3 720606 0800 41.0
Si —O3 72060b 0830(C)720606 0800 1 O 9.5 314.0
SIe—03 720606 1330 330 40
SP—u3 720607 0735 39.0
SR—03 720606 0800(C)720607 0735 1200 10.2 238.0
SR—03 720607 0635(C) 720607 0840 24000 1300
SR—03 720607 0935(C)720607 1125 7900 490
SR—03 720607 1230(C)720607 1430 13000 90
SR—03 720607 1530(C720607 1730 18000 700
SR—03 720607 0735(C 720608 0740 1600 10.4 300.0
Sr(03 720608 0640(C)720608 0840 92000 4600
SR— 03 720608 0935(C)720608 1125 35000 4900
SR—03 720608 125oC) 720608 1440 92000 7000
SF —03 720608 1535C)720608 1735 2400001 1700
SR—03 720608 0740(C)720609 0755 1100 8.8 246.0
SR—03 720609 0755(C) 720610 0735 1400 9.4 314.0
SR—03 720610 0735(C)720611 0645 1400 10.3 253.0
SR—03 720611 0647(C)720611 0840 7000 1100
SR—03 720611 0940C)720611 1140 7900 700
S —03 720611 1410C)720611 1610 160000 1700
SR—03 720611 1705(C)720611 1800 240000L 3200
SR—03 720611 06451C)720612 0700 1000 8.3 230.0
SR—03 720614 0700 (C) 720615 0700 1400 9.6
SR— 03 720615 0700(C 720616 0700 8.9 220.0
-------
(IRONNENTAL PI OTECTI0Pd AGZNCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENSp GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
31615 32240 00310 00340 00530 00535 50050 32730 00545
FEC COL1 TANNIN 800 COD RESIDUE RESIDUE CONDUIT PKE 5LS RESIDUE
NPNECNED LIGNIN S DAY NI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT FLOU SETTLOLE
STATION DATE TINE DATE TINE DEPTh /100ML NO/I NG/L MG/I c G/L MG/L NOD UG/L L/L
SR 07 720605 1400 170 23.500
SR O7 720605 0800 (C) 720606 0830 67 16.0 351 36 24 28.500
S .O7 720606 0835 28.500 54
SR U7 720606 13 o5 130 28.500
SR 07 720606 0830(C)720607 0815 32 16 20.900 1K
SR U7 720607 0630(C)720607 0900 330 28.900
SR O7 720607 1145 28.900 30
SR 07 720607 0955(C) 720607 1145 310 28.900
SR 07 720607 1245(C) 720607 1645 700 23,900
SR 07 720607 1545(C)720607 1745 310 28,900
SR 07 720607 0815(C) 720608 0815 94 361 36 12 29.300 1 k
SR 07 720608 0630(C)720608 0910 230 29,300
SR—07 720608 1100 29,300 26
SP 07 720608 1005tC)720608 1145 170 29.300
SR 07 720608 12.0(C)720608 1445 90 29.300
SR O7 720608 1540(C)720608 1740 130 29.300
SR 07 720608 0315(C) 720609 0005 17,0 20 0 28.300
SR 07 720609 0935 28,500 27
SR—07 720610 0805 20.500 30
5R 07 720609 0005(C) 720610 0805 92 16,0 360 12 8 23.500
SR 07 720611 0750 26
SR—07 720610 030S(C)720611 0750 17.0 28 12 30.100
SR 07 720611 0640(C)7206 11 0845 790 30.100
SN ’07 720611 0945(C)720611 1145 1300 30.100
5R 07 720611 1415(C)72061 1 1615 90 30,100
SR—07 720611 1305 30.100
SR O7 720611 1710(C)720611 1005 70 30 I0O
SR 07 720611 0750(C72 0612 0805 63 19,0 360 2 12 29.330 fl
5R 07 720612 0006 29 .300
SR 07 720613 0005(C) 720614 1305 62 17,0 353 22 15 27,600
SR ’07 720614 0305(C) 720615 0010 67 16,0 352 10 3 27.200
SR—07 720615 0010 (C) 720616 0740 67 20,0 320 10 10 20.508
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Iv
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY 11972)
00010 00080 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665 00680 31505
WATER COLOR LAB NN3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI
TEMP PT-CO PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET C MPH CONF
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS S I) MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L / IOOMI.
SR—07 720605 1400 33.0 3900
SR—O7 720605 0800(C)720606 0830 1300 8.1 0.88 4.020 0.410 118.0
SR—07 720606 0835 26.5
SR—07 720606 1345 49000
SR—07 720607 0815 30.0
5 1 1—07 720606 0830(C)720607 0815 1200 8,3 0.97 0.500 0.960 115.0
511—07 720607 0630(C1720607 0900 17000
SI 1—07 720607 0955(C)720607 1145 2200
SR—07 720607 1245(C)720607 1445 54000
511—07 720607 1545(C) 720607 1745 35000
511—07 720607 0815(C)720608 0815 1000 8.2 1.00 4.510 0.450 0.900 125.0
SR—07 720608 0630(C)720608 0910 - 35000
SR— 07 720608 1005(C)fl06o8 1145 17000
SR—07 720608 1240(C)720608 1445 24000
S 1 1—07 720608 1540(C)720608 1740 33000
SR— 07 720608 0815(C)720609 0805 900 7.9 1.15 4.350 0.550 0.830 125.0
SR—07 720609 0805 1C)720610 0805 1200 8.2 1.05 4.100 0.550 0.820 125.0
SR—07 720610 0805(C)720611 0750 1100 8.2 1.33 4.200 0.550 0.860 120.0
SR—07 720611 0640(C)720611 0845 7900
SR—07 720611 0945C)720611 1145 11000
SR—07 720611 1415(C)720611 1615 1700
SR—07 720611 1710(C 72O611 1805 1300
SR—07 720611 0750(C )720612 0805 900 7.9 1.01 3.880 0.550 0.920 123.0
SR—07 720613 0805(C)720614 0805 1300 7.7 0.08 3.500 0.600 1.100
SR—07 720614 0805(C1720615 0810 1000 7,7 0.650 1.050 123.0
SR—07 720615 0810(CJ720616 0740 7,7 3.500 0.750 1.050,
-------
110*110 ctlt11C$
ii. oasis pans cnapy
easna .. nm lsa
- sf1 flMU T-
Qaical Cnscssiration rank Tosicity
DreaM t Counnund C lan. a ll tinl Pomila Io )ubi l it , sail Tat. I Odor
o—nethony—ph.noi phenol 0.044 Cn o 2 ad. sn l. In tilting strength for Odor threshold
star Parch 70 te 50 . 111 inn 30°C water
is 0.002 s flL 1
wanillin as stdahyda 0.77 C5303 slightly Sal. uokn i Odor threshold
I a phsnnt is watar
acstowasi llin a kst 5 a sat. at 0951003 slightly sol. unknown unknown
phenol 0.6-0. ill in watsr
syring-aldehyds a aldahyds 0.57 095 1004 slightly aol. unknown unknown
a a phenol in water
Unknown c ound dollar to syring sldshyda set. at 0.6-0.7
painttic acid fatty acid 0.14 CLdHUO Z insoluble is unknown unknown
water
staaric acid fatty acid 0.075 ClsilmOz inaolubla In unknown unknown
wa Ist
attic acid fatty acid 0.56 C 16 H 34 0 2 insoluble in unknown unknown
ratar
pisaric acid raain acid 0.62 020113002 insoluble In unknown unknown
v ast
dshydroabistic acid resin scid 1.4 03053003 ts.oli*ls in unknown unknown
water
abiatic acid resin acid 0.76 CufljoO, inaolsbta is unknown unknown
water
noosbiscic acid rests acid 0.12 C 1 ii 30 0 2 insoluble in n i unknown
water
beta—ocisans casyans at. at Cjg$ nown u na unknown
hydrooanbns 0.02-0.04
bats—pinans terpea eat. at C 10 n 14 issolubis in unknown unknown
hydrocarbon 0.024.0* watar
fenchyi sicohol alcohol 0.0*1 C 10 1 1 0 0 slightly sot- in,k n unknown
oW. in water
casphor katone o.oia C 1 j g0 inaolitia In unknwai siniaa dater-
watar tab ls runt, that
can Do tastad 1.9
s o/li,
bornan l alcohol 0.047 c 1 ji 1 o wary slightly unkn unknown
ao iuble in
wauar
alphs—tsrpinsot alcohol 0.70 Ctoni& siightiy sni— unknown unknown
uble in water
There ars slsn S unidaniifisd c sunds In the 0.7—0. 5 soil rasga and ghoul I .tbsr unidantafiad c ownd. is the 0.01-0.1 sg/i range
j/ Quantttativ. standard uaavailable.
1 ’ California Ifatsr Quality Crttssis. Califosnia Vatar owrcss Control heard, Puhl. 3 4 u bid Id. 1563.
-------
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY
CANTONMENT, FLORIDA
- EFFLUENT -
Fish Taste
Organic Chemical Concentration Toxicity &
Compound Class _ mg/l — Chemical Formula Solubility mg/l Odor
oleic acid fatty acid 0.071 Cj 8 H 34 0 2 Insoluble unknown unknown
in water
stearic acid fatty acid 0.026 C 18 H 36 O 2 Insoluble uijknown unknown
in water
palmitic acid fatty acid 0.030 Cl 6 1 1320 2 Insoluble unknown unknown
in water
pimaric acid resin acid 0.23 C 2 0 H 3 0 02 Insoluble unknown unknown
in water
dehydroabietic resin acid 0.51 C 2 0 1 12802 Inscluble unknown unknown
acid in water
abietic acid resin acid est. at C2 0 1 13 00 2 Insoluble unknown unknown
0.30 in water
several unidentified compounds — estimated concentration 0.05
1/ Quantitative standard unavailable.
-------
0 2 0INIC COJ0’WIWS
I6ISQIN POLK A PIUKG C ANY
MT iC TK , AUSAIIA
-tnw-
Chenkcel Concentration List. Tozictry
Oreesic e..w....a Cleat I I Channel Vorsalo Solubility r n / I Tests 6 Odor
phenol phenol 0.77 C 6 1 6 0 readily voter 13.3 oaflJ6 hr Tic for threshold cant.
soluble bluo ltill 0 02-0 03 . itZ1
o—creeol phenol 1.4 C11 3 c 6 11 4 011 readily water 24 ac /i 46 hr Tie for odor threshold at
ooluhle fathead etonnwo_J 30C — 0.071
e—croeol phenol 2.3 CH 3 H 4 0H readily water 24.5 e /l 24 hr IL. for odor threshold at
soluble corpi ’ 30C — 0.33 i ii2
2 , 5— q lenol phenol O,B2 (CII 3 ) 2 C 6 K 0H readily water sin ner to 3 ,1. xylsnol!. 1 cellar to phenol 11
soluble
3 .5—eyleoot phenol 1.5 (C5 1 3 ) 2 CgIt 3 0ie readily water 53 .r /l — 24 hr T in for stellar to phenol1 ’
soluble rarpt ’
3 , 1 .—zy lenol phenol 0.52 CCil 3 ) 2 C 6 1i 3 0et readily water 30 e /l — 24 hr The for ei.niler to phenol2/
soluble carp... ’
2-nepthoic acid aronetic 0.16 C 10 11 7 C00H water soluble unknown unknown
rarbosylic
acid
dshydro.bietic acid recta arid 0.024 C 20 0 28 0 3 insoluble in unknown unknown
weter
one isar of pyridine a. @ 0.1—0.21/ CC11 3 ) 2 C 5 H 3 N about 10 gel unknown unknown
diathvl pyrites 100 ge water
2,4,4 trinethypyridiss pyridioe 0.31 C0 1 3 ) 3 C 5 R 2 6 slightly soluble unknown unknown
in weter
quino ina bonspyridle. 1.5 C 4 R 4 N ,CltOltCH readily eel— S mg/ I was lethal to unknown
uh Is in water hiuegills in 4 hr
1 3°C
two isomers of nethyl alkaloid oat. 6 0.5— C 1 I 9 N slightly water unknown unknown
qulnol ine 0.6 for one soluble
6 0.05—0.06
fec the ocher
twa t. re of diathyl benepyridtne both at. 1 , (Ch 3 ) 2 C 9 H 5 N slightly water unknown unknown
qulnolinoa 0.05-0.06... soluble
erenepthsoe napihelene 0.20 C (CK 2 ) 2 insoluble in unknown unknown
water
dtbonsofwrsn furan 0.12 C 6 1 4 0C 6 H 4 insoluble to unknown unknown
weter
I luorene tricyclic 0.17 C 6 k 4 NHC 6 II 4 insoluble In unknown unknown
aronstic ‘ — ‘—i weter
hydrocarbon
diphenylene sulfide eronacic set. I C 3 il 6 S .ntknown unknown unknown
self ide 0.05 -0.0 1.1 1
phsnenthren. tricyclic 1.4 C 14 1 1 10 insoluble in S np/i killed rainbow enknown
exoatic water trout and bluegtilee in
hydrocarbon 24 hre
enthreqelnone tricyclic eat. I C 4 1 1 4 i(C03 2 :C 4 1 1 4 insoluble In unknown unknown
quince. O.01. 4 ,O6V wear
pyrene tet vecyclic 0.33 C 16 6 10 insoluble in unknown unknown
aromatic water
hydrocerbon
flusrenthane tetracyc lie set. I C 16 1 1 10 Insoluble In unknown unknown
ar tic 0.5—0.7 water
kflrocazbcn
1/ Quantitative standard unavailuble.
V Celifornie Water Quality Criterie, California Water Resource. Control Beard, Pubi. 3—A, 2nd Ed. 1963
-------
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TENNECO, INC.
BAY MINETTE, AlABAMA
EFFLUENT
Fish
Chemical Concentration Toxicity Taste
Organic Compound Class mg/i Chemical Formula Solubility _ j _ & Odor
dehyroabietic acid resin acid 0.1 C 20 H 28 0 2 insoluble in unknown unknown
water
palmitic acid fatty acid 0.38 CH 3 (CH 2 ) 14 C00H insoluble in unknown unknown
water
oleic acid fatty acid 0.21 CH 3 (CH 2 ) 7 CH insoluble in unknown unknown
CH(CH 2 ) 7 COOH water
NOTE: There are 40—SO other organic compounds in this waste but most appear to be components of the oil found
in the waste.
-------
APPENDIX K
WATER QUALITY DATA
PERDIDO BAY AND TRIBUTARIES
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PEROIOO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY 00 LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—T
TEMP PT—CO Al 25C PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL P—WET
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICRONHO MG/L SU MG/L MG/I MG/L MG/L
PR—Ok 720606 1535 0002 25.0 40 225 8.6 6.6 0.01K 0.200 0.010K 0.040
PR—UI 720607 1630 0001 26.0 30 37 6.5 7.4 0.03 0.360 0.050 0.040
PR—UI 720608 1005 0001 24.5 35 45 7.8 7.3 0.01K 0.130 0.110 0.060
PR—ok 720609 1435 0000 26,5 30 45 8e4 6.6 0.05 0.180 0.080 0.040
PR—Ui 720610 1120 0000 24.5 30 44 7.8 7.4 0.01K 0.200 0.090 0.120
PR—0i 720611 1250 0000 24.0 35 39 8.2 7.2 0.05 0.140 0.140 0.040
PR—Ui 720612 1522 0000 25.0 30 180 8.5 6,6 0.01K 0.150 0.100 0.060
—01 720606 1110 0001 25.0 30 475 4.8 6.9 0.02 0.320 0.700 0.690
U—Ok 720607 1400 0001 26.0 30 130 5,3 6,6 0.03 0.800 0,840 0.650
8—01 720608 0830 0001 25.0 35 65 4,8 6,5 0.01K 0.860 0.770 0.610
B —O1 720609 1210 0000 28.0 30 100 4,6 6.7 0.01K 0.260 0.820 0.610
8—01 720610 0925 0000 25.5 35 97 4.7 6,6 0.01K 0.330 0.770 0.580
—O1 720611 1130 0000 24.5 50 65 4.3 5,7 0.08 0.330 0,690 0,440
8—01 720612 0930 0000 24.5 40 260 4.5 6.0 0,03 0.250 0,700 0.440
00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940 00340 00530 00535
T ORG C TOT COLI FEC COLI TANNIN BOO CHLORIDE COD RESIDUE RESIDUE
C MPN CONF MPNECHEO LIGNIN 5 DAY CL HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH HG/I 100ML /100NL MG/I MG/L MG/L MG/I HG/L HG/I
PR—Ok 720606 1535 0002 3.0 790 50 0,6 50K 5K 5K
PR—Ok 720607 1630 0001 4.0 40 40 1,2 5K 5K
PR—Ok 720608 1005 0001 3.0 4900 790 0 1.7 50K 6 5K
PR—Ok 720609 1435 0000 2,0 1700 80 0.7 5K 5K
PR—Ok 720610 1120 0000 3,0 790 80 1 0,7 50K 24 0
PR—Ok 720611 1250 0000 2,0 790 170 1,2 12 5K
PR—Ok 720612 1522 0000 3.0 4900 80 1 0,6 50K 1 5K
8—01 720606 1110 0001 4.0 350000 170000 1,8 8,0 5K 5K
8—0 1 720607 1400 0001 4.0 7900 2300 1,3 0.0 6 6
B —Ok 720608 0830 0001 3.0 79000 800 0 0,7 7.0 5K 5K
B—Ok 720609 1210 0000 3,0 35000 1700 1.2 0.0 5K 5K
8—01 720610 0925 0000 3.0 7900 330 1 1,0 8,0 5 5K
6—01 720611 1130 0000 4,0 54000 2300 1,6 7,0 16 5K
6—01 720612 0930 0000 4,0 4900 790 0 0,9 7,0 16 5K
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT ION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY 1 19U)
00010 00080 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665
WATER COLOR DO LA8 P11 13-N TOT ICJE.L N02&N03 PMOS—T
TEMP P1—Co PH TOTAL P1 N—TOTAL P—WET
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MG/I SU MG/L MG/I MG/L MG/I
IM—Ol 720606 1500 0000 33.0 1250 1.9 7.9
EM—UI 720607 1600 0000 35.0 1100 1.4 7.7
EM—Ol 720608 0940 0000 30.0 900 1.5 7.6
EM—Ol 720609 1415 0000 32.0 800 1.8 7.8
EM—Ui 720610 1105 0000 30.0 1000 Q.4 7.7
EM—Ol 720611 1235 0000 32.0 1000 1.2 7.5
EM—Ui 720612 1500 0000 32.5 1000 1.0 7.6
EM—Ol 720614 0820 0000 1100
EM—Ol 720615 0820 0000 1100 7.6
EM—Ui 720616 0b20 0000 7.6
EM—02 720606 1435 0000 32.0 900 2.7 7.9
EM—02 720607 1540 0000 35.0 900 1.8 7.8
EM—02 720608 0920 0001 30.0 900 2.3 7.7
EM—0i 720609 13S0 0000 31.0 800 2.0 7.8
EM—02 720610 1050 0000 30.0 900 1.1 7.8
.M—O2 720611 1220 0000 32.0 900 1,6 7.5
EM—02 720612 1445 0000 32.5 900 1.4 7.7
tM—02 720614 0830 0000 900 7.6
EM—02 720615 0830 0000 800 7.6
EM—02 720616 0615 0000 7.6
00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00340 00530 00535
T OR(, C TOT COLI FEC COIl TANNIN BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE
C MPN CONF NPP4ECMED LIGNIN S DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL. NFLT
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L /LOOML / IOOML MG/I MG/I MG/I MG/I MG/I
EM—UI 720606 1500 0000 118.0 17000 200 64 16.0 328 40 20
EM—O k 720607 1600 0000 121.0 4900 50 20 5K
EM—Ok 720608 0940 0000 117.0 28000 700 88 341 26 6
EM—UI 720609 1415 0000 132.0 92000 220 21.0 24 10
EM—UI 720610 1105 0000 123.0 22000 220 87 16.0 335 20 8
£N01 720611 1235 0000 107.0 ‘.900 330 18,0 40 SIC
EN—Ol 720612 1500 0000 130.0 7900 460 67 20.0 354 30 8
( 14—01 720614 0820 0000 75.0 60 20.0 341 44 14
(14—01 720615 0820 0000 117.0 63 23.0 362 28 10
£M01 720616 0620 0000 120.0 63 20.0 320 36 16
EM—02 120606 1435 0000 112.0 14000 200 59 12.0 314 40 12
( 1 4—02 720607 1540 0000 134.0 4900 70 12 SIC
(14—02 720608 0920 0001 111.0 22000 1700 81 306 22 6
Ei —02 720609 1350 0000 114.0 2000 490 18.0 16 8
(14—02 720610 1050 0000 111.0 7900 20 81 16.0 316 5 24
LM—02 720611 1220 0000 90.0 3100 330 16.0 48 5K
(14—02 720612 1445 0000 111.0 11000 490 57 16.0 318 22 8
(14—02 720614 0830 0000 70.0 55 20.0 298 23 9
(14—02 720615 0830 0000 95.0 53 16.0 260 32 14
(14—02 720616 0615 0000 115.0 56 18.0 282 16 5K
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SUR EILLaNC ( AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY U972)
00010 000UU 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665
WATER COLOR CNOUCTVY DO LAB N143—N TOT ICJEL N021N03 P’iOS—T
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N N-TOTAL P—WET
STATION DATE TIME DAlE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICROMHO MG/L SU MG/I MG/I MG/I 146/L
( ‘ 1—03 720606 1135 0000 26.0 700 3.4 7.9
114—03 720607 1415 0000 34.0 100 2.8 7.6
(14—03 720608 0855 0000 25.5 600 2.6 7.6
[ 14—03 720609 1140 0000 20.0 700 2.4 7.8
tt4—03 720610 0945 0000 27.0 700 1.8 7.7
(14—03 720611 1110 0000 21.0 700 2.6 7.5
(14—03 720612 0950 0000 26.5 600 2.4 7.4
(14—03 720614 0845 0000 700 7.6
114—03 720615 0835 0000 800 7.5
(14—03 720616 0600 0000 7.5
(14—0 ’ . 720606 1230 0001 28.0 700 3260 2.5 7.8 0.38 1.720 0.500 0.480
(N—U ’. 720607 1450 0001 30.0 500 1370 0.0 7.4 0.42 1.820 0.700 0.530
(14—04 720608 1400 0001 31.5 700 2570 1.4 7.4 0.59 2.300 0.600 0.480
(14—04 720609 0740 0001 27.0 000 2500 0.8 7.7 0.53 1.820 0.600 0.460
EM—u’. 720610 1435 0001 28.0 650 0.9 7.8 0.60 1.870 0.550 0.410
[ 1 4—0’. 720611 1010 0001 26.0 400 2500 0.6 7.3 0.61 1.610 0.550 0.460
EM—04 720612 1055 0001 27.0 bOO 2200 0.4 7.4 0.68 1.710 0.500 0.430
(14—04 720613 1110 0001 27.5 650 3260 7.5 0.45 1,600 0.550 0.460
00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00340 00530 00535
T ORG C TOT C CLI F€ C COIl TANNIN BOO COD RESIDUE RESIDUE
C MPN CONF MPNECHEO LIGNIt4 5 DAY HI LEVEL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT
STATION DATE TIME DATE TIME DEPTH MG/I /100ML /100141 NG/L MG/I MG/I MG/I MG/L
(14—03 720606 1135 0000 80.0 2400 20 47 12.0 233 28 20
(14—03 720607 1415 0000 88.0 330 170 12 SIC
(14—03 720608 0855 0000 88.0 92000 330 60 237 20 6
(14—03 720609 1140 0000 69.0 7900 330 10.0 24 14
(14—03 720610 0945 0000 81.0 11000 490 62 14.0 240 44 20
EM—Gi 720611 1110 0000 65.0 1300 490 13.0 28 SIC
(14—03 720612 0950 0000 90.0 14000 2800 42 11.0 231 36 SIC
(14—03 720614 0845 0000 50.0 42 16.0 237 30 14
(14—03 720615 0835 0000 76.0 44 13.0 227 31 14
(14—03 720616 0600 0000 40.0 46 16.0 29 13
(14—04 720406 1230 0001 58.0 4900 50 41 8.3 12 12
114—04 720607 1450 0001 68.0 1300 50 8 SIC
(14—04 720608 1400 0001 65.0 3900 70 44 14 SIC
(14—0’. 720609 0740 0001 65.0 92000 80 4.9 12 8
(14—04 720610 1435 0001 63.0 92000 130 34 5.6 12 SIC
(14—04 720611 1010 0001 60,0 24000 330 5.0 20 8
EM—04 720612 1055 0001 65.0 2300 230 33 5.1 20 6
(14—04 72061 1110 0001 63.0 24000 110 10.0 18 10
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
— 00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630 00665
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJ(L N026N03 PHOS—T
TEMP PT-CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N N-TOTAL P—WET
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MIC 0NHO MG/L SU MG/ I. MG/I NG/L MG/I
P—O1 720606 1300 0005 27.0 35 20300 6.5 7.4 0.01K 0.300 0.010K 0.030
P—01 720607 1505 0005 28.5 40 19900 3.1 7.7 0.01K 0.350 0.010K 0.040
p—UI 720608 1420 0005 29.0 35 11400 8.2 8.1 0.01 0.230 0.010K 0.030
P—Ok 720609 1055 0005 28.0 25 11600 7.0 7.8 0.05 0.130 0.010K 0.030
P—Ui 720610 1627 0005 28.0 30 4800 8.3 7.8 0.04 0.170 0.020 0.020
P—0 1 720611 1023 0005 26.5 25 4200 7.5 6.5 0.03 0.200 0.010K 0.020
P—Ui 720612 1310 0005 27.5 20 7400 8.5 7,1 0.01K 0.140 0.010K 0.020
P—cl 720613 1127 0005 27.0 20 5320 7.9 7.1 0.01K 0.130 0.010K 0.010
P—02 720609 0750 0002 28.0 90 16800 6.3 7.8 0.01K 0.130 0.050 0.050
P—02 720610 1440 0002 28.5 80 17200 6.6 8.0 0.05 0.230 0.020 0.060
P—02 720611 1000 0002 27.0 90 14300 6.0 7.1 0.06 0.400 0.070 0.060
P—ce 720612 1050 0002 27.0 45 19000 6,5 7.5 0.08 0.160 0.010 0.040
P—02 720613 1100 0002 27.0 30 19600 6.8 7.8 0.01K 0.120 0.010K 0.040
00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940 00530 00535
T ORG C TOT COLt FEC COLI TANNIN BOD CHLORIDE RESIDUE RESIDUE
C MPH CONF MPNECMED LIGNIN 5 DAY CL TOT NFLT VOL NFLT
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/I /100HL /100141 MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
P—O 1 720606 1300 0005 4.0 490 20K 3.0 5K 5K
P—cl 720607 1505 0005 5.0 20 20K 3.2 12 5K
p-cl 720608 1420 0005 4.0 490 20K 1 3.4 6 5K
P—01 720609 1055 0005 4.0 330 20K 1.2 6 6
P—Ol 720610 1627 0005 3.0 1100 20 1 0.8 6 5K
P—cl 720611 1023 0005 790 70 1.8 12 5K
P—01 720612 1310 0005 4.0 220 20K 0 1.4 16 5K
P—U I 720613 1127 0005 3.0 170 20 1.1 14 5K
P—02 720609 0750 0002 9.0 1300 50 3 1.0 5850.0
P—02 720610 1440 0002 6.0 4300 20 3 1.0 6150.0
P—02 720611 1000 0002 9.0 170 20K 4 0.6 5450.0
P—02 720612 1050 0002 7.0 490 20K 1 1.3 6300.0
P—02 720613 1100 0002 7.0 60 20K 1 1.3 6500.0
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
I PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICRONHO HG/L SU MG/L MG/L
P—03 720609 0820 0003 28.0 65 16400 6.8 8.0 0.01K 0.480
P—03 720610 1510 0003 28.5 65 18600 7.4 8.3 0.01K 0.200
P—03 720611 1005 0003 27.5 65 16500 6.3 7.8 0.01K 0.310
P—03 720612 1105 0003 26.5 35 19000 6.9 7.6 0.01K 0.230
P— 03 720613 1108 0003 27.0 45 19400 7.9 0.01K 0.450
P—04 720609 0830 0003 28.0 50 18400 7.1 8.2 0.01K 0.190
P—04 720610 1500 0003 28.5 65 17900 6.9 8.3 0.01 0.200
P—04 720611 0840 0003 26.5 40 10400 7.1 7.7 0.01K 0.160
P—04 720612 1035 0003 27.0 40 20000 6.7 8.1 0.01K 0.280
P —04 720613 0905 0003 27.0 35 20900 6.8 7.9 0.01K 0.280
_____________________ _____ ___ — a
00630 00665 00680 31505 31615 32240
N021N03 PtIOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI FEC COLI TANNIN
N—TOTAL P—WET C HPN COP4F NPNECMED LIGNTN
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L HG/L /100ML /100ML MG/L
P—03 720609 0820 0003 0.010K 0.060 6.0 490 20K 2
P—03 720610 1510 0003 0.010k 0.050 7.0 110 20K 2
P—03 720611 1005 0003 0.010K 0.040 8.0 50 20 2
P—03 720612 1105 0003 0.010K 0.040 5.0 340 20k 1
P—03 720613 1108 0003 0.020 0.070 9.0 1700 20K 2
P— 04 720609 0830 0003 0.010K 0.020 5.0 490 20 1
P .04 720610 1500 0003 0.030 0.040 7.0 790 20K 3
P—04 720611 0840 0003 0.010K 0.020 7.0 70 20K 1
P—04 720612 1035 0003 0.010K 0.050 7.0 1300 80 1
P— 04 720613 0905 0003 0 ,010K 0,040 7.0 80 20 1
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PEROIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
____
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630
WATER COLOR CNOUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICROMHO MG/L SU MG/L MG/L MG/I
P—OS 720609 0800 0004 27.5 45 17600 7.1 8.2 0.01K 0.200 0.010K
P— 05 720610 1445 0004 28.5 70 18200 7.5 8.4 0.03 0.200 0.030
P—os 720611 0955 0004 27.0 45 16600 6.6 7.8 0.04 0.200 0.040
P—OS 720612 1042 0004 26.5 35 20700 6.7 8.1 0.01K 0.280 0.010K
P—05 720613 1050 0004 27.0 25 23600 6.6 8.0 0.01K 0.130 0.010K
P—06 720609 0840 0004 28.0 45 17500 7.0 8.2 0.01K 0.110 0.010K
P—06 720610 1515 0004 28.5 55 18100 7.1 8.4 0.01 0.230 0.010K
P—06 720611 0950 0004 26.5 65 17000 5.5 7.8 0.01K 0.200 0.020
P—06 720612 1115 0004 27.0 30 20700 6.9 8.0 0.01K 0.250 0.010K
P—O6 720613 1045 0004 27.0 38 22000 6.7 7.9 0.01K 0.110 0.010K
00665 00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940
PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COIl FEC COLI TANNIN BOO CHLORIDE
P—WET C MPN CONF MPNECMED LIGNIN 5 DAY CL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/I MG/I /100ML /100ML MG/I MG/L MG/L
P—05 720609 0800 0004 0.020 7.0 140 20 1 1.1 6300.0
P—05 720610 1445 0004 0.060 7.0 330 20K 2 1.6 6500.0
P—05 720611 0955 0004 0.040 9.0 2 2.3 6000,0
P—OS 720612 1042 0004 0.060 8.0 790 20 1 1.3 6700.0
P—OS 720613 1050 0004 0.040 6.0 330 70 1 1.2 7550.0
P—O6 720609 0840 0004 0.050 7.0 20K 20K 1
P—06 720610 1515 0004 0.040 7.0 490 20K 2
P—06 720611 0950 0004 0.050 7,0 1300 20K 2
P—06 720612 1115 0004 0,060 6.0 490 20 1
P—06 720613 1045 0004 0.040 7.0 50 20K 1
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
a
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630
WATER COLOR CNOUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL P102&N03
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICROMPIO MG/L SU MG/I MG/I MG/I
P—O7 720609 0850 0003 28.0 45 18200 6.8 8.3 0.01K 0.100 0.010K
P—07 720610 1522 0003 28.5 45 18700 7.5 8.4 0,01K 0.250 0.010K
p—ui 720611 0945 0003 26.5 50 18000 6.0 7.9 0.01K 0.300 0.030
P—07 720612 1120 0003 27.0 45 20700 7.0 8.0 0.01K 0.300 0.030
P—07 720613 1037 0003 27.0 35 21600 6.5 7.9 0.01K 0.180 0.010K
P—08 720609 0810 0004 27.5 45 18200 6.7 8.1 0.01K 0.260 0.010K
P—08 720610 1455 0004 28.5 55 18200 8.0 8.6 0.01 0.260 0.020
P—08 720611 0850 0004 27.0 40 19000 5.7 7.9 0.01K 0.200 0.010K
P—08 720612 1137 0004 27.0 30 23900 6.9 8.2 0.01K 0.230 0.010K
P—08 720613 0913 0004 26.5 36 22300 6.9 8.0 0,03 0.150 0.020
00665 00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940
PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLt FEC COLI TANNIN BOO CHLORIDE
P—WET C MPN CONF MPNECMED LIGNIN 5 DAY CL
STATI(’N DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/I /100ML /100ML MG/I MG/I NG/L
P.07 720609 0850 0003 0.030 6.0 80 20K 1 1.5
P—O7 720610 1522 0003 0.040 6.0 80 20 1 1.6
P—07 720611 0945 0003 0.040 6.0 330 20K 1 0.8
p—07 720612 1120 0003 0.060 7.0 40 20K 1 1.5
P—o7 720613 1037 0003 0.040 7.0 330 20K 1 1.4
P—08 720609 0810 0004 0,030 7.0 130 20K 1
P—O8 720610 1455 0004 0.050 7.0 490 20 2
P—os 720611 0850 0004 0.040 6.0 80 20K 1
P—08 720612 1137 0004 0.040 6.0 50 20K 1
P— 08 720613 0913 0004 0,040 6.0 80 20K 1
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
01
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C P 1 4 TOTAL N N—TOTAL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICRONHO MG/I. SI) MG/I. MG/ I . M6/L
P—09 720609 0804 0004 28.0 40 21500 7.1 8.1 0.04 0.050 0.010K
p—09 720610 1450 0004 28.5 40 19200 7.5 8.5 0.01K 0.210 0.010K
P—09 720611 0930 0004 27.0 40 18800 7.0 7.9 0.01K 0.310 0.010K
P— o9 720612 1132 0004 27.0 35 22700 6.9 8.1 0.01K 0.160 0.010K
P—09 720613 1022 0004 27.0 30 23900 7.0 8.0 0.01K 0.130 0.010K
P—b 720609 0900 0004 27.5 45 18100 6.9 8.1 0.01K 0.180 0.010K
P—b 720610 1527 0004 28.5 45 18100 7.2 8.5 0.01 0.120 0.010K
P—10 720611 0940 0004 27.0 35 18800 6.3 7.9 0.01K 0.260 0.010K
P—10 720612 1125 0004 27.0 35 23000 5.9 8.0 0.01K 0.300 0.010K
P—b 720613 1030 0004 26.0 32 23200 6.0 8.0 0.01K 0.260 0.010K
00665 00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940
PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI FEC COLI TANNIN BOD CHLORIDE
P—WET C MPH CONF MPNECMED LIGNIN 5 DAY CL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L /100ML /100ML MG/L MG/L MG/L
P—09 720609 0804 0004 0.020 15.0 70 20K 1 1.0 6800.0
pQ9 720610 1450 0004 0.040 5.0 490 50 1 1.0 6750.0
P—09 720611 0930 0004 0.030 6.0 170 20K 1 0.8 6450.0
P—09 720612 1132 0004 0.040 5.0 170 110 1 1.1 7300.0
P—09 720613 1022 0004 0.030 6.0 20K 20K 1 1.0 7600.0
P—b 720609 0900 0004 0.040 6.0 330 20K 1
P—10 720610 1527 0004 0.040 5.0 230 20 1
P—iD 720611 0940 0004 0.030 6.0 50 20K 1
P—b 720612 1125 0004 0.050 5.0 170 20K 1
P—iD 720613 1030 0004 0.030 6.0 260 20K 1
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS, GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
eeae
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625 00630
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT I JEL N021N03
TEMP PT-CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N N—TOTAL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICROMHO MG/L SU MG/ i.. MG/L MG/L
P—il 720609 0925 0004 28.5 35 21200 6.8 8.2 0.01K 0.200 0.010K
P—il 720610 1537 0004 28.5 40 18900 7.4 8.5 0.01 0.190 0.010K
P—il 720611 0853 0004 27.0 35 19900 6.4 8.0 0.04 0.230 0.020
P—il 720612 1145 0004 27.0 30 23400 7.1 8.2 0.01K 0.280 0.010K
P—il 720613 1007 0004 27.0 31 24500 6.8 8.2 0.01K 0.230 0.010K
P—12 720609 1030 0005 28.5 35 21000 7.0 8.4 0.01K 0.200 0.010K
P—12 720610 1540 0005 28.5 40 20800 9.0 8.9 0.05 0.180 0.020
P— 12 720611 0857 0005 27.0 30 19700 6.6 8.0 0.01K 0.240 0.010K
P—12 720612 1150 0005 27.0 30 26100 7.4 8.5 0.01K 0.220 0.010K
P—12 720613 1000 0005 26.5 24 25100 7.2 8.4 0.01K 0.110 0.010K
a
00665 00680 31505 31615 32240 00310 00940
PHOS—T T ORG C TOT COLI FEC CDLI TANNIN BOO CHLORIDE
P—WET C MPN CONF MPNECMED LIGNIN 5 DAY CL
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L NG/L /100HL /100ML MG/L MG/I MG/L
P—il 720609 0925 0004 0.010 4,0 20 20K 1
P—il 720610 1537 0004 0.030 5.0 700 170 1
P—il 720611 0853 0004 0.030 5.0 20K 20K 1
P—Il 720612 1145 0004 0.030 6.0 20 20K 1
P—li 720613 1007 0004 0.030 6.0 130 20K 1
P a12 720609 1030 0005 0.010 5.0 20 20K 1 1.0
P—12 720610 1540 0005 0.040 6.0 20 20K 2 2.4
P—l2 720611 0857 0005 0.030 5.0 80 20K 1 1.2
P—12 720612 1150 0005 0.020 5.0 80 20K 1 1.2
P—12 720613 1000 0005 0.020 6.0 20 20K 1 1.0
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
REGION IV
ATHENS. GEORGIA
PERDIDO AREA FIELO STUDY (1972)
00010
00080
00095
00300
00403
00610
00625
00630
WATER
COLOR
CNDUCTVY
DO
LAB
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
TEMP
PT—CO
AT 25C
P 14
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
STATION
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
CENT
UNITS
MICROMMO
MG/L
SU
MG/L
MG/I
MG/I
P—13
720609
1040
0005
28.5
30
21000
7.0
8.4
0.01K
0.150
0.010K
P—13
720610
1547
0005
29.0
40
20600
8.6
8.9
0.03
0.190
0.020
P— 13
720611
0902
0005
27.0
JO
20600
6.7
8.2
0.01K
0.100
0.020
p—13
720612
1155
0005
27.0
30
27400
7.1
8.5
0.01K
0.220
0.0 10K
P—13
720613
0952
0005
26.5
27
26900
6.9
8.4
0.01K
0.290
0.010K
P—i’.
720609
0935
0005
28.5
25
23800
7.0
8.4
0.01K
0.150
0.010K
P—i’.
720610
1553
0005
29.0
30
21300
6.9
8.6
0.01K
0. 0O
0.010K
p—i’.
720611
0905
0005
27.0
30
22000
6.6
8.4
0.01K
0.240
0.010K
P—i ’ .
720612
1205
0005
27.0
30
26300
7.4
8.5
0.01K
0.230
0.010
P—i’.
720613
0945
0005
26.5
15
26800
7.2
8.4
0.01K
0.350
0.010K
00665
00680
31505
31615
32240
00310
00940
PHOS-T
I QRG
C
TOT
COLt
FEC COLt
TANNIN
BOO
CHLORIDE
P—WET
C
HPN
CONF
MP$ECMED
LIGNIN
5 DAY
CL
MG/L
MG/I
/100ML
/100141
MG/I
MG/I
MG/I
STATION
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
P—13
720609
1040
0005
0.020
4.0
20
20K
1
P—13
720610
1547
0005
0.050
6.0
20
20K
2
P—13
720611
0902
0005
0.020
5.0
20K
20K
1
P—13
720612
1155
0005
0.030
5.0
790
220
1
P—13
720613
0952
0005
0.030
5.Q
110
20
1
P—I’.
720609
0935
0005
0.0 20.
4.0
•
110
20K
1
1.3
P—i’.
720610
1553
0005
0.040
5.0
50
20K
1
1.1
p—i’.
7206ii
0905
0005
0.020
5.0
20
20K
1
1.1
P—i’.
720612
i205
0005
0.020
4.0
330
170
1
1.0
P—i ’ .
720613
0945
0005
0.020
5.0
40
20K
1
1.0
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ATHENS. GEORGIA
PEROIDO AREA FIELD STUDY (1972)
00010 00080 00095 00300 00403 00610 00625
WATER COLOR CNDUCTVY DO LAB NH3—N TOT KJEL
TEMP PT—CO AT 25C PH TOTAL N
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH CENT UNITS MICROMHO MG/L SU 14G/L MG/L
P—iS 720609 0950 0005 28.0 25 6.8 8.5 0.01K 0.230
P—15 720610 1600 0005 29.0 25 23200 7.5 8.7 0.01K 0.230
P—iS 720611 0910 0005 27.0 25 24900 6.8 8.4 0.01k 0.150
P—15 720612 1212 0005 27.0 25 27900 7.3 8.5 0.03K 0.220
P—15 720613 0927 0005 26.5 25 28200 8.5 0.01K 0.200
P—lb 720609 0955 0005 28.0 20 28200 7.1 8.6 0.01K 0.200
P—lb 720610 1605 0005 29.0 25 25900 6.8 8.7 0.01K 0.130
P—lb 720611 0915 0005 27.0 20 25600 6.6 8.2 0.01K 0.100
P—16 720612 1220 0005 27.0 20 29200 7.4 8.6 0.01K 0.220
P— 16 720613 0935 0005 26.5 20 28400 8.6 0.01 0.140
s__a__s_s __ e_ as
00630 00665 00680 31505 31615 32240
N026N03 PHOS—T T ORG C TOT CDLI FEC COLI TANNIN
N—TOTAL P—WET C MPH CONF MPNECNEO LIGNIN
STATION DATE TIME DEPTH MG/L MG/L MG/L /100ML /100ML MG/L
p—iS 720609 0950 0005 0.010K 0.010 4.0 20 20K 1
P—iS 720610 1600 0005 0.010K 0.020 4.0 20 20K 1
P—l5 720611 0910 0005 0.010K 0.010 4.0 20K 20K 1
P—15 720612 1212 0005 0.010K 0.020 5.0 130 50 1
P—iS 720613 0927 0005 0.010K 0.020 5.0 80 20K 1
P—16 720609 0955 0005 0.010K 0.010K 4.0 20K 20K 0
P—lb 720610 1605 0005 0.010K 0.040 4.0 20 20 0
P—lb 720611 0915 0005 0.010K 0.010 4.0 330 130 1
P—16 720612 1220 0005 0.020 0.030 4.0 20K 20K 0
P—lb 720613 0935 000S 0.010K 0.020 4.0 20K 20K 1
------- |