;LEA
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH
Projects of the
Industrial Pollution Control Branch
August 1969
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
-------
PROJECTS
HJDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH
William J. Lacy, Chief
August 1969
Division of Applied Science and Technology
Office of Research & Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
A. Industrial Pollution Control Technology . 1
Estimated Volume of Industrial Wastes
Before Treatment-1963 12
II. Waste Water Characteristics & Pollutants of
Selected Industry Groups . 13
III. Comparative Pollution Index Based on Surface
Water Criteria for Public Water Supplies 11i.
IV. Standard Industrial Classification of Industries
of Signiricance for Water Pollution 15
V. Source of Pollutants & Relative Priorities . ... 16
VI. Water Quality Parameters 17
VII. Pollution Control Program Summary 18
VIII. Total Current Value of Waste Treatment Requirements
of Major Industrial Establishments 19
IX. Program Schedule of Milestones 20
Trends & Use of Water for Public Supplies, Rural
Sapplies, Ifrigation, and Industry, 19k5-1965
DollarValueofProjects
Project Participation
Location of Projects
D. Project Information Sheets
PPB 1106 Joint Municipal Industrial
PPB 1201 Metal & Metal Products
PPB 1202 Chemicals & Allied Products
PPB 12011 . Paper & Allied Products
PPB 1205 Petroleum & Cool Products
PPB 1206 Food & Kindred Products
PPB 1207 Machinery & Transportation Equipment
PPB 1208 Stone, Clay & Glass Products
PPB 1209 Textile Mill Products .. .
PPB 1210 Lumber & Wood Products
PPB 1212 Others
PROJECTS of the INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH
B. Tables
I.
C. Figures
I.
II.
III.
IV.
.. 21
.. 22
23
21 1.
25
140
61
75
97
109
111.1
111.3
1147
155
159
111
-------
INDUSTRIAL R)1J UTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
INT )DUCTION
Industries use hugh quantities of the Nat.ion’s waters and are thei major
factor in the continuing rise in water pollution. They utilize over
15 trillion gallons of water but, prior to discharge, treat less than
5 trillion gallons. In terms of a single pollution parameter ( )D),
waste generated by industries are equivalent to a total population of
over 360 million people. Even more undesirable than the LOD loads
of industrial effluents are the enormous quantities of mineral and chem-
ical wastes from factories which steadily become more complex and varied.
They include metals such as iron, chromium, nickle, and copper; salts
such as compounds of sodium, calcium, and magnesium; acids such as
sulfuric and hydrochloric; petroleum wastes and brines; phenols, cyanides;
ammonia; toluene; blast furnace wastes; greases; all varieties of sus-
pended and dissolved solids; and numerous other waste compounds. These
wastes degrade the quality of receiving waters by causing tastes, odors,
and color; and excess mineralization, salinity, hardness, and corrosion.
Some a.re toxic to plant and animal life.
The variety and complexity of inorganic and organic components contained
in industrial effluents pre8ent a serious liquid wastewater treatment
control problem in that the pollution and toxicity effects of these
constituents are of greater significance than those found in domestic
wastewaters.
Conventional wastewater treatment technology which is often adequate for
existing waste types, offers even less promise of providing the type and
degree of treatment to be required in the near future. Industrial
pollution control technology, therefore, must be developed and demonstrated
to achieve effective and economical control of pollution from such indus-
tries as those producing metal and metal products, chemical and Rllied
products, paper and A11ied products, petroleum and coal products, food
and kindred products, texLiles and leather goods.
To continue the attack on the problem of industrial pollution will require
a cooperative industry—gove ’ nment effort to conceive, research, develop,
and demonstrate treatment processes, production modifications, water
reuse and water conservation programs. The ongoing research and demonstra-
tions, funded by Section 6 grants, have been made to manufacturers and
processors representing about every major source of industrial pollution.
The continued and expanded support is urgently needed specifically to
implement the demonstration R&D programs related to new or improved
techrology for the treatment, reuse, and/or disposal of industrial waste—
waters and their sludge residues. Existing data suggests that about
half of the total volumes of wastes processed by municipalities is of
I
-------
industrial origin. nphasis imist be continued to achieve the most effective
water pollution control by means of joint municipal—industrial treatment.
Another key area where the efforts must be expanded involves the deinonstra—
tion of by—product recovei y and utilization.
In this respect, the most promising and beneficial area requiring additional
support is the implementation of closed—loop (water reuse) treatment
systems for the industry.
An accelerated industrial pollution control research, development, and
demonstration program wil] measurably decrease the amount of expenditures
needed to accomplish these goals, increase the efficiency of treatment,
and eliminate the gaps in treatment technology.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the industrial pollut5,.on control R&D program is to develop
and demonstrate the reqj iired technology to achieve required degrees of
pollution control by lease cost methods for all significant industrial
sources of pollution.
P GRALOF WQ
The program includes all research, development, and demonstration efforts
necessary to resolve industrial pollution problems.
The objectives will be met by using the research and development grant
mechanism, supplemented by in-house laboratory programs. The IPCB will
implement and administer demonstration projects for new arid novel indus-
trial wastewater treatment projects applicable for the majority of all
significant industries. These demonstrations will include the latest
developments in physical, chemical, biological, and combinations of
treatment methods. It is expected to develop further the cooperation of
industry to participate in meaningful pollution abatement demonstrations
and to increasingly demonstrate the feasibility of in—plant measures,
by -product recovery, and wastewater reuse as methods to abate pollution
and to reduce treatment costs.
Research through in—house efforts and by contracts to industries and uni-
versities are to complete state of the art studies related to treatment
and control technology for selected industry groups. Similarly, industrial
wastewaters are to be identified, characterized, quantitized and classified
for a].]. industries of pollutionaJ. significance.
wrhe Industrial Pollution Control Branch
z
-------
1)
Industrial wastes are the Nations principal point sources of controllable
waterborn wastes. In terms of the generally quoted measureinenbs of strength
and volume, gross wastes of manufacturing establishments are al3out three times
as great as those of the Nation’s sewered population (reference Table I).
Moreover, the volume of industrial production, which gives rise to industrial
wastes? is increasing at about 4.5% a year or three times faster than the
population. A so significant is the variance of composition of industrial
wastes, which contain all known pollutants of concern in water pollution
abatement as well as some unidentified factors.
Table I shows reported quantities of industrial wastewaters discharged in 1963
and 1 WPCA estimates of the quantities of standard biochemical mçygen demand
(BOD 5 ) and settleable and stthpended solids contained in the wastewaters. The
wasteload estimates, based upon an estimate of the “avei age” quantity of
pc. Uutant per product unit, indicate that the chemical, paper, and food and
Idnth’ed industrial groups generated about 90% of the BOD in industrial
wastewater before treatment .
S nii1ar statistics on net wasteload discharges are not completely available.
However, indications are that the extent of industrial wastewater treatment is
not greater than that currently practiced for municipal wastewaters.
Industrial wastes differ markedly in chemical composition, physical charact-
eristics, strength, and toxicity from wastes found in normal domestic
sewage. Every conceivable toxicant and pollutant of organic and inorganic
nature can be found in industrial wastewaters, as indicated in Table II
for selected industries. Thus the BOD or solids content often are not
adequate indicators of the quality of i dustrial effluents. For example,
industrial wastes frequently contain persistent organics which resist the
secondary treatment procedures applied normally to domestic sewage. In
addition, some industrial effluents require that specific organic compounds
be stabilized or that. trace elements be removed as part of the treatment
process.
It is therefore necessary to characterize each industrial wastewater to
permit comparative pollutional assessments to be made for indivLdual
industries as well as industry groups. Characterization will permit
classifying the components of industrial wastewaters into as few as four
basic classes of pollutants to more readily collate pollution statistics
and to evaluate economics of methods of treatment as well as to project
lease cost methods. Proposed generalized basic classification parameters
are BOD, COD, SS, and TDS into which all known pollutants can be classed.
Also required is the estahli.sl,ment of a relative pollution comparative
index for all significant pollutants. This index in combination with the
known characteristics and volume of a wastewater will determine the rela-
tive gross pollution severcLty of all industrial wastes and establish
(1)
Note the 1200 program described herein does not include thermal pollution
requirement and associated problems.
-------
a basis for comparing the severity of pollution from industries.
Table III presents permissible criteria for surface water for public
supplies as obtained from the Report of the Co mittee on Water Quality
Criteria, April 1, 1968. The addition of an assumed 30D 5 value of
5mg/ito these criteria permits comparisons of the listed pollutants to
be made against a tmi.t of BOD. ljnder these circumstances it is relative-
ly apparent that pollutants such as Endrin and Phenol (on a mg/ i concentration
equivaJ.ent basis) are 5000 tiiiies more critical as pollutants than BOD.
Further work in this area wi].]. permit establishment of more accurate
priorities in terms of our nations most critical needs.
Indus x’ial wastes will require the develorinent, demonstration, and
evaluation of treatment methods suitable for each significant industrial
waste type which is significantly different from domestic waste.
Table IV is a listing of all major industry groups and industries of
suspected significant contributions to water pollution. These have been
selected on the basis of a p oceas water intake of at least 1 billion
gallons per year and with regards to the potential for’ pollution from
the process usti of the water. For program planning and bud.geting purposes,
the industries’ are grouped into thirteen subprogram elements as sho ’m in
co1u i one of Table I. Within each element, the identity of industry
group(s) by their Standard Industrial Classification code number is also
presented. as in coln two of Table I.
The industries listed in Table III number appro d.mately 150 and represent
potentially equally numerous wastewat era of signifioa t1y different char-
acteristics, fOr which treatment techno1o r must either be developed or
upgraded. The interchangeability of treatment technolog between similar
types of wastewatera is anticipated but will have to be demonstrated
through results of grant research projects, or in house studies. Because
resource allocations may nQt be suffigient to encompass the potential R&D
demand imposed by the diverse nature of industrial wastes, a priority
system must be established and used in the ‘llocation of R&D efforts for
industrial wastewater problems.
At this time a firm priority for R&D activities based on an ultimate com-
parable basis of pollution severity, has not been established f or industrial
wastes. However, a cursory examination of Table I, and assuming the (noD 5 )
parameters of pollution severity %s the prime indicator of pollution,
initial basis for ranld.ng the industry groups for priority R&D efforta, is
possible. However, 1c oi4edge of il]. chemical and physical parameters of
pollution, as well as the state of the art and economic considerations
are necessary to more adequately assess priority for R&D investments.
Tables V and VI list National Priorities for both pollution sources and
water quality parameters • These were established on the basis of best
available information in order to establish an initial base.
4
-------
In spite of + he comp1e d.ty and magnitude of industrial pollution, initial
estimates of the costs of clean waters from industri.al sources have been
made. As summ ized in Table VII industrial capital requirements to
abate pollution by 1973 to the extent of providing 85% treatment effective-
ness, are substantially less than estimated capital requirements for
municipal treatment or collection facilities for separting combined sewers,
while the gross poflutional load contributed is substantially greater than
ei ther. This indicates that the average cost of industrial waste treatment
is substantially less than fOr municipal waste treatixient when based on
treatment cost per lb BJD. If these estimates are reasonably accurate it
wculd appear that for the most part industrial pollution control to the
equivalency of secondary treataient is within a reasonable cost and need
only be developed and demonstrated for the various industries in our
economy which are sigi1ific nt contributors of pollution.
In sunni ary the needs show that the 1200 program must be pr ‘ i ’i1y dedicated
to the attainment of:
1. Qualifying and quantitizing industrial wastes and treatment practices.
2. Implementation of undemonstrated but feasible treatment methods to
as many types of industries as possible.
3. Reduce cost of treatment by the beneficial recovery and reuse of waste—
water contaminants.
1. Technical Consideration : The alternatives in wastewater treatment
are shown in summary flow diagram below.
Water Reuse — Add
Treat
Water Supply Industry wastewater Treatment to Environment.
Reuse
_________I By Product
W XarKe1 Recovery
To Environment
5 .
-------
The alternatives sho rn primarily consist of:
a. Wastewater Treatment (as required to abate pollution to meet
water quality standards)
(1) for dischar e (to meet necessary water quality criteria)
(2) for reuse (to meet industrial water quality demands to
conserve water and offset cost of treatment).
b. In—raant Measures (to reduce pollutants and water discharge)
(].) Operational (housekeeping techniques and manufacturing
procedures)
(2) Desimi (to permi.t reuse, to reduce wastewater generation)
c. Re idue Treatme.nt
(1) By—nrpduct recovery (to reduce gross di.sposal, utilizes
values)
(2) Residue stabilization (to meet enviror ental standards)
d. Combined Methods
(1) Joint Treatment (to utilize scale factors, off peak capacity,
S ynergistic effects)
(2) Others (combined a—b—c methods as appropriate)
The alternatives best suited for implementation in specific 1200 programs
will depend on many factors and local conditions. Where the state—of—art
of treatment is essentially non—existing, emphasis on treatment to meet
environmental standards should prevail. For ionprogressive industries,
in—plant measures should be explored for potential application. For
industries which have demonstrated effective treatment methods, lower cost
alternatives of treatment stressing reuse and by—product recovery should
be giren consideration.
GOATS
1. General : To provide each basic industry the demonstrated, developed,
and evaluated technolo for the abatement or prevention of water pollution
from individual or multiple wastewater sources, by new or improved methods
and techniques which have potential value for industry wide application
where no methods exist or over existing methods employed.
In summary, to upgrade the state—of—art for the treatment of all industrial
wastewaters.
2. Spe jfj : a. Technical:
1. Define pre and post program state-of—art.
2. Establish and maintain centers of excellence to assist in
state—of—art maintenance.
3. Develop cooperation of industry to maintain state of art.
4. Develop techrd.cal, design arid operational guides for each
industrial waste of significance.
5. Characterize industrial wastewaters and classify the pollutants
into the four major categories of B)D, COD, TDS or SS.
6. Develop comparable criteria for pollutional severity of con-
taminants.
7. Establish relative severity of industrial wastewater pollutants
in terms of total discharges.
-------
b. Economic:
1. Develop comparable basis for economic evaluation of industrial
waste treatment.
2. Determine pre and post program, economics of industrial waste—
water treatment.
3. Show that cost of adequate wastewater treatment will not xceed
1 to 2% of the total cost of industrial operations.
c. Demonstrate £ or each industry of significance:
1. Feasibility of effective treatment (=85% removal) systems
2. Effective (=85% removal) treatment systems within the following
costs:
removal
ti
I,
3. Least cost methods either directly
the results of program activities.
4. By-produce recovery and wastewater
of pollution control.
5. Total wastewat.er reuse and residue
ORGANIZATION
1. General : The organization of the 1200 program showing interrelation-
ships of activities to meet objectives and goals is shown in figure 1.
Also it is shown in outline form to consist of three major efforts, admin-
istrative, activities development, and implementation projects.
for BOD
for COD
f or TDS
for SS
= 13.5 40O0 gal
= l4e /1OOO gal
= l5 /hlOOO g al
= 6 4OOO gal
or = l /lb BOD
or = 3 /1b COD
or =.O5 /lb TDS
or = 1 f1b SS
or through inference from
reuse as feasible methods
conversion to utility value.
7
-------
ORGANIZATION OUTLINE
1. Administration
a. Centers of excellence
b. Activities Developnent
c. Intpleinentation program
2. Activities Deve].oruten€
a. Centers of excellence
1. TechnicaJ. Information Ackivities
a. Wastewaters characterization
b. Criteria for pollutants comparability
c. Standards of performance
2. Economic Bases
a. Demonstration Grants
b. Industry Wide Impact
b. State of Art
1. Initial (by contract)
2. Periodic (In—house)
3. Terminal (In-house)
c. Cooperation of Industries
1. Participation in implementation program (though gr nts and coptracts)
2. To develop wastewater treatment standard (In—house & with respective
mfg. association)
3. Maintain R&D implementation
4. Disseminate information
3. JI iemen tatippJro ec4
a. Research
b. Development
c • Demonstration & Evaluation
d. Technical—Econnmics of Wastewater treatment processes
S
-------
It should be apparent that extensive cooperation and communication among
all. participants and activities will be required.
The program iG orientated to upgrade th state—of—art for industrial
waste treatment to the extent that industries will thereafter continue
to maintain the art in a progressive manner with minimum Federal R&D
assistance. Therefore, it. is imperative that the cooperation of industry
be attained in the earliest phases of this program.
SCHEDULE AND NII TONES
There are three major milestones to be demonstrated for each major industry
category. Attainment of these milestones will provide an upgraded state—
of—art for industrial wastewater treatment which i ziU aflow substantial
decreased Federal R&D efforts to subside in favor of industry’s own continued
maintainence program.
The major milestones are:
1. Demonstration of the equivalence of secondary treatment for all industries
of significance within each industrial category. The equivalence of secondary
treatment is the removal of about 85% of the primary pollutants from indus-
trial wastewaters.
2. Development and demonstration of the necessary treatment requirements
f or industrial wastewaters of significance to the extent required to meet
state and local water quality criteria. In a majority of cases this require-
ment can be attained by the removal of up to 98% of primary pollutants, or
the removal to a high degree (85%) of secondary but significant contaminantes
from industrial wastewaters.
3. Develop and demonstrate the means to control all major pollutants from
all thdustries.
These milestones are to be attained in the years as shown in Table VIII for
the industrial categories indicated.
q
-------
TECHNICAL PAPERS
LAG!, W.J, “Research and Development Program — Industrial Waste Conference,”
American Cultured Dairy Products Institute Meeting, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York, Oct., 1967.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “The Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Research and Development Program: Industrial Pollution Control,’ 1 American
Electroplaters Society Convention, San Francisco, Calif., July, 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., RE!, G., “Industrial Pollution Control, Research and
Development Program,” Southwest Regional American Chemical Society Meeting,
Austin, Texas, Dec. 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Research
and Development Program: Industrial Pollution Control,” Plating . pg. 1299.
Dec., 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Financial Aspects of Industrial Pollution Abatement,
Research and Development,” American Association of Textile Chemists and
Colorist Meeting, Washington, D.C. Feb., 1969.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Federal Assistance Available to Companies Establishing
Pollution Control Prograçss, Textile Chemist and Colorist . i. (7), pg. 25,
March 1969.
LACY, W • J., “Industrial Water Pollution Control Research and Development,”
Engineer and Scientist Society Meeting, Patuxent River, Md., June, 1969.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Federal Grants Available for Industrial Pollution
Control,” Water and Sewage Works: Industrial Waste Supplement • pg. 12, May, 1969.
RE!, G., CYWIN, A., BERNARD, H., DEL, S., “Distillation of Wastewaters: A
Water R2source for Arid Regions,” International Conference on Arid Lands in a
Changing World, Tueson, Az. June, 1969.
PARK, P.K., WEBSTER, G.R., YAMA IIOTO, It., “Alkalinity Budget of the Columbia
River,” Limnolozv and Oceanography , JJ , (4), pg. 559, July 1969.
PARK, P.K., WEBSTER, G.R., CATALFOW),M., REID, B.H., “Nutrients and Carbon
Dioxide in Columbia River,” Limriolozv and Oceanograthr . (to be published)
LACY, I i. J., “Industrial Water Pollution Control — FWPCA Research and Development
Program.” Conference on the Treatment and Disposal of Waste from Vegetable
Processing, New Orleans, La., August1969.
I0
-------
PROJECT REPORTS
FWPCA Title, Author
Report No . ______________________
01W-i “ Joint Municipal & Semichemical Waste Treatment, t ’
City of Erie Pa., Hainmermill Paper Company,
July 1969, 11060 EOC, WPRD 223-01-68.
ORD-2 “ Disposal of Wastes from Water Treatment Plants, ”
American Water Works Association Research Foundation,
August 1969, 12120 ERC, WP 1535-01-69.
01W-S “ Activated Sludge Treatment of Chrome Tannery Wastes, ”
A. C. Lawrence Leather Company,
August 1969, 12120, WPED 133-01-68.
DAST-3 “ Foam Separation of Kraft Pulping Wastes, ”
Georgia Kraft Company,
September 1969, 1201 . 1.0 EUG, WFRD 117-01-68.
II
-------
TABLE I ESTIMATED VOLUME OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES BEFORE TREATMENT, 1963
pPB SIC ,.V Industry Total 7 Waste- Process Water Intake- Standard Bio-Cliem. Settleable and Suspendes Solids.
Code Code Group(s) water, billion gal. Billion gallons Oxygen Demand Million Million pounds
1 2 fl 1 33,34 Metal & Metal Products >4.300 1,000 >480 >4.700
1202 28 Chemical & Allied Products 3.700 560 9790 1.900
1203 — - Power Production (NA) ±1 N A.. ! / N.A JI
1204 26 Paper & Allied Products 1.900 1.300 5,900 3.000
1205 29 Petroleum & Coal 1.300 88 500 460
1206 20 Food & Kindred Products 690 260 4,300 6.600
1207 35.36.37 Machinery & Transportation Equip 48l 109 .250 SO
1208 32 Stone, Clay, and Glass Products (218) Si 88 N.A N.A
1209 22 Textile Mill Products 140 110 890 N A.
1210 24.25 Lumber & Y ood Products (126)11 57 N.A A.
1211 30 Rubber & Plastics 160 19 50
1212 12. 19.21.27 Miscellaneous Industrial Sources 450 190 >390 >eao
31. 38.39.72
1200 All Manufacturing l3 .l00 t3.700 22.000 18.000
For Comparison ,
sewered population of U S 5.300 2 1 N A. 7,300 8.SOOa/
j/ 120.000.000 persons a 120 gallons a 365 days j/ Standard Industrial Classification ilncludes cooling waxer and
,y 120,000,000 persons x 1 t6 pounds a 365 days f Not Available or Not Applicable Steam production waters
.1R20.000.000 persons a 0 2 pounds a 365 days j/ Included in Total for All M%
(1) Ref Volume U- The Cost of Clean Waters 1968.
-------
TABLE UP
d STEWATGI CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTANTS
OF S&ECTEO INDUSTRY GROUPS
SIC CODE 201 203 22 26 281 282 2911 3111 331 3334 Vt
- Fibers - - Steel
Liquid Waste ‘ meetic !!EL Canned& Textile Mill Paper & Reeic Plastics Petroisiati Leather Taflningr Rolling - Primary ‘Motor Vehicles
Cherecterietic - — — Products trozen Foede Suger Predects Allied Prodects Chemicals & Rubbers Fertilizer Refining & Finienlng & Finishing ATi ni t _!
U NiT VOLUMES x x x I I S I I I I * I S
x a it I ‘C 2! I x I k
AC IDiTY X it it _it I A X
A EAL INITY I C E I z a — I
- x x x it x 1 -
DOe K A X I K
TOTALSOL JOS A I ‘ C I it It X I I I j
5LiSPENOED5OLIOS A A A I I It It It It I I t - &
ROD5/SODuitiiseie * a a a x it I X I X t
a it 1 .3 ±
OIL&GREASe It It I It it I I I I
DETEAOENT5 A I .
• (Suulacaiitel I It It I I
ILOS IDE A It I t ‘ C It I I I
HEAVY METALS
A
it a
Ceee.i ‘C
_it It 1 *
it
Cu Mi eane.. I It
• Nick.i it I
x
N iTRODEN
Amqiufl ,e It It I It It It it I It
Nitrate It 4
Nitrite It it
Dteinm x It Ii it X
Tot.i a it it I
PHO S PHO m IS It It I
PHENOLS ‘ C X It I - I
54JLFiDE it It It It It ‘ C
TURSiDiT A It ‘C It
.5ULFATE I It It I it It
THIOSULFATE It It
MERCAPTANS - ‘C I It
LittiNiNS — I
8I n Flie it 1
PHOSPHATES - - - K
POTASSiUM ‘C It X
CALCi UM X I
POLYSACCHARIDRS - ‘C
SODIUM ‘C It
It V I
!ohiiC iT t I ‘I
MAGNESiUM -
AME 4ONiA ‘ C it It
CYANIDE C It
______ S I
FERROUS EON it It ‘C
- ‘C
ALUMiNUM ‘C
•ttirt Vrtes,. It - The ‘!o r a ‘tai Wear - YC!
-------
TABLE I I I
Conparative Pollution Index Based on
Surface Water Criteria for Public Water Supplies
Constituent or characteristic Penn issible Relative Paragraph
Criteria Criteria
Physical:
Color (tolGi unlts).....’.. ’u”0”” s....s...snu75.
Odor • .. . .. Narrative. .... ..... ...........2
Temperature ..... ...... do ..a . nonfl ’S 3
Turbidity non . .... . . do . 4
Microbiological.
C ol iform organisms .... 1 0.000/100 ml 1..
Fecel colifoitr ls ........e.....2 .000/100 mll..à.. fl fl ” 5
Inorganic chemicals (my 1)
Alkalinity ..... ......Narrative ...n... .u ..•suSS ’U””’1””” 1 ’ 6
5 (as N).. 0 1 ss.sn 7
Arsenic’ ... 0.05. ‘0.01 a
Barium. . 1 0 0.2 .
Boron 0 ... ...................... 1 0
‘.0.01 . .
Chloride’... a ‘.250 50 ...... a
Chromium’. hexavalent . o ’O 05
Copper’..... . .......... I a
Dissolved oxygen ............................o....... >4(monthly mean) . ......ilO
3(individual sample)
Fluoride’ . . Narrative ....... ..l I
Hardness . do
Iron 0.3 flOe ’ 9
Lead’ 0.05 01 . a
Manganese’ (filterable) . . .......... 0.05 .01 B
Nitrates plus nitrites’ ‘.10 (as N) . . .......
pH (range) .. 6.0_8.5...........................S” ’ ’”””””4 4
Phosphoruses1mu stuu . .........Narretive ,,.n.15
Selenium’’’”’ 0.01 8
Silva . .. ..... 0.05 .“ ..... ‘a’.ss. ”.......ss.osS•S• 8
...........‘‘‘S’’’’’250 .i.....susu•s ss s ’’ ’’’’’’’ 50 .8
Total dissolved salids’ ‘‘“500 100
(filterable residue).
Uranyl ion’ 1 .n.........1 7
Zinc St. 5...............i........O... . . 1 SISOSO•SOfl•5S 8
Organic chemicals
Carbon chloroform extract’ (CCE) 0 15 18
Cyanide’.. . .. . .... a...... . 0.20 . ‘ “ 8
Methylene blue active 0.5...............n.n ...............s...o .. .i’
Oil and grease ...........Vurtually absent ‘ s . . .
Pesticides
Aldrin’’ 0 017 21
Chiordane 0 003 21
DDT rJ042
Dieldrin’ . 0017 21
Endrin’’ 0001 .0002 21
Haptachloro 0 018 . ‘21
Heptach lorepoxida 0.018 — .......21
Lindane ‘ ‘“ ‘“ ‘ “ ‘ ‘. 055 21
Methoxychlor’ 0.035 21
Organic phosphates plus 0.12 21
carbamates’
Toxaphene” •flflflfl5 .0005 8
Hat bucudes
2 4DpIus 2.4.5—T.plus 2.4.5-TP 0 1 .02 21
Phenots 0 001 0002 8
Radioactivity (pc’l(
Gross beta’ 1.000 8
Radiiim—226 “3 2 ..‘.‘‘‘s ’. 8
Strontium-90 10(4) 1 8
BOD
The defined treatment process hee littie effect on thiq 131 All ‘elalive to sOD
consituent. (41 Mex value found in tap water anaiysis 01 20 coiTwnUnitie s
I Microbioioaucel limits era monthly arithmetic avoragos
based upon ar, adequate number of eernolpa. 151 Raport of the conutnittee on water Quality criterie. Aliril i. ieee
Tote! coluform limit may be relaxed if fecal coiiforrn concen-
tration does not exceed the specified iimit 2 As parathion
in cf,oiunesterese inhibition, it may be necessary to raaoii
to even lower conceniraf ions for some convouruda or mixiurea.
See Paragraph 21.
It
-------
TABLE IV
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CJ. ASSIFICATION OF
INDUSTRIES OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR WATER POLLTUION
FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS
Meat products
Meat slughtering plants
Meat processing plants
Meat processing plants
Poultry dressing plants
Dairies
Creamery butter
Creamery butter
Natural and precess cheese
Condensed and evaporated milk
Fluid milk
Canned and frozen loods
Canned (nuts and vegetables
Dehydrated foods products
Pickles, sauces, salad dressings
Frozen fruits and vegetables
Grain mills
Flour mills
Cereal preparations
Wet corn milling
Bakery products
Sugar
Candy and related products
Beverages
Malt liquors
Wines and bt brandy
Distilled liquor,
Soft drinks
Miscellaneous foods and kindred products
Cottonseed oil mills
Soybean oil mills
Animal and marine fats and oils
Shortening and cooking oils
TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS
2211 Weaving mills, cotton
2221 Weaving mills. synthetice
2231 Weaving, finishing mills, wool
225 Knitting mills
226 Textile finishing, except wool
228 Yarn and thread mills
229 Miscellaneous textile goods
24 LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS
242 Sawmills and planning mills
2421 Sawmills and planning mills
PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
Pulp mills
Paper mills, except building
Paperboard mills
Paper and paperboard products
Paporboard containers and boxes
Building paper and board mills
28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
Basic chemicais
Alkalies and chlorine
Organic chemicals, n.e.c.
Inorganic chemicals, n.e.c.
Fibers, plastics. rubbers
Plastics materials & resins
Cellulosic man-made libei’s
Organic tibeis, noncellulosic
Drugs
Cleaning and toilet goods
Paints and allied products
Gum and wood chemicals
Agricultural chemicals
Miscellaneous chemical products
PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
Petroleum relinrng
Paving and rooting materials
RUBBER AND PLASTICS PRODUCTS, n.e.c
Rubber products, n.e.c
Plastics products. n.e.c.
31 LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS
3111 Leather tanning and finishing
Flat glass
Cement, hydraulic
Structural clay products
Pottery and related products
Concrete and plas r products
Cut stone and stone products
Nometauic mineral products
33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
Steel rolling and finishing
Iron and steel foundries
Primary nonferrous metal
Secondary nonferrous metals
CODE
26
2611
2621
2631
264
265
2661
CODE
201
2011
2013
2013
2015
202
2021
2021
2022
2023
2028
203
2033
2034
2035
2037
204
2041
2043
2046
205
206
207
208
2082
2084
2085
2086
209
2091
2092
2094
2096
281
2812
2818
2819
282
2821
2823
2824
283
284
2851
2861
287
289
29
2911
295
30
3069
8079
STONE. CLAY, AND GLASS PRODUCTS
32
3211
8341
325
326
327
3281
329
331
332
333
3341
‘5
-------
TABLE V
SOURCES OF POLLUTION NATIONAL PRIORITIFS
No PPO Coagory
Priority
PØSpt soooay I 1204
2 Momoipol onotod o 2 1101
3 Pn (tknool) ; — -—tI 3 1203
4 Agriwltoro too -ott 4 1302
5 Smut 6 woibtood onon 5 1152
f b i
O o s t Oy 0 1200
7 Potroo bootool Sthjotoy 7 202
O Iooçotloo rotors flow 0 1303
O Potooloow rotbtuog ot oy 0 1205
I s P.S lots tO 135*
II Mood & motol products lodootry 11 1201
12 Umarsod dootetic wool. I S t I PS
13 Moo.. 13 1501
54 14 1507
IS Oil pohtwo S prsdoctt.t I I 1403
IS 0rpm : dtorotcol mdosty 14 1202
IS AadMoooo IS 1401
00 Impondmooto 1 5 O0
IS Noctootlon boots 1501
00 Uosoweod or i neff v ma
21 Tootito rodootry tO 1000
02 toorpomo obmorcol mdostoy 10 . u2
23 Commorcrol vowS 20 1502
24 C000tTOct 100 octroilroo 25 1503
25 Pototo procooslog 22 1200
20 Phonuocoollcol monofoctoro 23 1202
27 Pauoordo mdoolry 24 1202
20 Solfwotor rotroolon 25 150k
2 0 Pboopboto mrnrog 25 1404
30 Loggrog 27 1301
31 Milk products & boodlung 20 1755
32 Portrbzor mooloctoro 29 1205
33 huh pr0000000g tolstoy 30 1200
34 tom irorrog 31 12 15
35 Mining 32 1404
30 Cool procooorog 33 1245
37 Strip oliolog coot. oood & orovol) 34 1404
30 Urooiom mining 35 1453
30 Moot potting 30 1200
40 Notorol polloffo’ 30 15 00
41 Cooorog todootry 37 1200
40 Sogor boot rodootry 37 12110
43 Cottlo rodootry 37 1304
44 OrIon 30 1212
45 Coppor mrouog 39 1404
40 Log otorogo 39 12 10
47 Agricoltorol chomlool prodocrroo 40 1252
40 Tooorog S looobor Idootry 41 1212
49 Rooloor motolfrib.o 41 1212
50 Orowory wootoo 42 120
•Oouolopod 1907-1000
-------
TABLE VI
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Prionty Parameter Piiority Pai aineter
1 Fecal cohforms 35 Sulfites & Sullides
2 temperature 36 Cyanide
3 Phosphates 36 DDT
4 Nitrogen compounds 36 Endrin
5 Dissolved oxygen 36 Dieldnn
6 Pesticides 36 Textile waste
7 Heavy metals 37 CO 2
8 Sulfates 37 Chiordane
9 Nitrates
37 Sulfite Liquors
10 Viruses
38 Fertilizer
11 pH 39 Color
12 Radioactive waste
13 Total organic carbon 39 Floating solids
14 Phenols 40 Conductivity
15 COD 41 Ethylene glycol
42 Saimonella
15 Total dissolved solids
16 Hydrocarbons 43 Taste & odor
17 H. Coli. 44 Iron
18 Oily wastes 45 CCE
19 Silting solids 46 Algal nutrients
20 Chlorides 46 Salinity
21 Nitrites 46 Slime growth factors
22 Organic compounds 46 Streptococci
23 Turbidity 47 Arsenic
24 BOD 47 Manganese
25 Paper & pulp waste 48 Total oxygen demand
25 Suspended solids 49 Water soluble organic
26 Acidity 50 CAE
27 SuIt ides 50 Water insoluble organic
28 Acid Mine Waste 51 Non-ionic detergent
29 Alkalinity 52 Sodium
30 Herbicides 53 Boron
31 Lead 54 Flurides
32 Zinc 55 Aquatic biota
33 Sulfur compounds 56 H2S undissociated
34 Cooper 57 NU4OH undissociated
________________ I?
-------
TABLE VII
POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM SUMMARY
Pollution Cost for Pollution Abatement Relative Gross Present Gross Relative Waste Type Projected
Control by 1973 - Billions of Dollars Pollution Load Load Treated Wastewater Total Water
Program Current Required 0&M Total ( BOO) Basis) ( 1962 - 64) Volume Use Increase
Cap. my . Cap. Iny. 67 — 73 (% change
1954-2000 )
Industrial 2.4 - 2.9 2.5 4 5 3 - 3 9 5.5 - 8.4 3.0(6) 35% 0.71 All types 716
Pollution (.35 - .43 (process
in_B?)
Control waters only)
(.18 jointly)
Municipal (1) ,i/ 40 8 - 8.7 1.4 - 1.7 9.4 - 10.4 1.0(7) ,j/40% 1.0 Primarily 238
(.2 in 67)
Pollution
Control
> 2
Combined = 60 6.2 ( NA = 6.2 = 0 4 4.” 60% 0.1 for Domestic 238
overflows
Sewer and (for
> B
Storm waste 25(3) NA = 25 0.1 NA(5)
Overflow collection
Control system) 49(4) NA = 49
(1) Includes Joint Treatment
(2) For Sanitary Sewers
(3) Storm Sewer Requirements for Urban Areas
(4) Complete Separation of Combined Sewers into Sanitary and Storm Sewers
(SiNes Applicable or Available
(6) Currently Jointly Treated
(7) Based on 120 Million Sewered Population
(8) For Overflows of Combined Systems
-------
TABLE VIII
Total current value of waste treatment requirements
of major industrial establishment*
Industry Fiscal 1969 Fiscal 1973
By Expert By Census
estimate projection
Food and kindred products 740 670
Textile mill products 170 170
Paper and allied products 320 920
Chemical and allied products 380 1000
Petroleum and coal 380 270
Rubber and plastics 41 59
Primary metals 1500 1400
Machinery 39 56
Electrical machinery 36 51
Transportation equipment 220 160
All other manufacturing 200 290
Total capital requirement 4000 5000
Plant currently provided:
By industry 2200 1800
Through municipal facilities 730 644)
Current backlog 1100 2600
* Assuming at least 85% reduction of standard biochemical oxygen demand (determined according to the five- day test) and of
settleable and suspended solids.
** All values rounded to two significant figures, constant dollars.
t Based upon Industrial Waste Profiles in Volume III of the report.
tt Based upon Census of Manufacturers data and established treatment cost factors.
-------
TABLE IX
PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF MILESTONES
Treatment Treatment
Secondary Required to Required to
Industrial Category Treatment meet Water Control all
PPB Milestones Equivalence Quality Criteria Major Pollutants
1201 Metal & Metal Products 1971 1973 1975
1202 Chemicals & Allied Products 1972 1974 1976
1203 Power Production 1972 1973 — — —
1204 Paper and Allied Products 1970 1973 1975
1205 Petroleum & Coal Products 1971 1973 1975
1206 Food and Kindred Products 1970 1973 1975
1207 Machinery & Transpoitation Equip. 1971 1973 1975
1208 Stone, Clay & Glass Products 1972 1973 — — —
1209 Textile MiliProducts 1971 1973 1975
1210 Lumber & Wood Products 1971 1973 1975
1211 Rubber & Plastics 1971 1973 1975
1212 Miscellaneous Industrial Sources 1972 1974 1976
-------
1945 1950 1955 1960
2 0
15
10
: Aumi
PUBLIC SUPPLIES
1965
0
0
‘U
0
C d )
z
0
-J
-J
z
0
SURFACE WATER
GROUND WATER
1945 1950 1955 1960 1965
RURAL SUPPLI ES
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1945 b0
1955
IRRIGATION
‘ “ t i
160
‘40
‘20
00
80
60
40
20
0
1960
1965
1245
FIG 1. TRENDS IN USE OF WATER FOR PUBLIC SUPPLIES.
RURAL SUPPLIES. IRRIGATION, AND INDUSTRY,
1945-65
V’50 1955 1060 1965
INDUSTRY
Note: Surface-water data for 1945 not availattle.
-------
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH PROJECTS
FIGURE II
“Dollar Value of Projects”
Total Cost of Projects
Initiated Each Fiscal Year
Value of Grants Awarded
68
69
70
Cumulative Total Project
Costs
Cumulative Value
Awarded
of Grants
.1.
50 50
40 40
3O 3O
20 20
10 10
I
70
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
-------
FIGURE III
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRPINCH
PROJECT PARTICIPATION
1Li O
120
100
Cumulative Projects -
Per Year
80
60
I .O
Pro.lects Per Year
20
67 68 69 70
FISCAL NEAR
-------
I I
‘S
4
FIGURE IV
LOCATION OF
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH
RESEARCH, DEVELOP}IENT, AND DEW)NSTRATION CONTRACTS AND GRANTS
August 1969
-------
PP u06
JOINT MIJNICIPAL-INDUS’TRIAL
11060
1Jj Letters To GPO P14
27 DLF Tualatin, Oregon N. Kiado G. Keeler
29 Dallas, Oregon K. Dosta]. G. Keeler
60 Green Bay, Wisc. C. Swanson G. Webster
66 Onondaga, New York L. To insend G. They
U]. KICK South St. Paul, Minn. C. Oster G. Keeler
149 EJD Hagersto n, Maryland H. Snyder C. This
206 DJB Grand Forks, North 0. Olsen G. Keeler
Dakota
223 EOC Erie, Pennsylvania G. Webster G. Webster
246 Jacksonville, Arkansas G. Putnicki G. They
197 DBF Harriman, Tenn. E. Loinasney G. Webster
DUJ Walton, N.Y. A. EichardsonG. Keeler
DPD Macon, G.A. E. Lomasney G. Webster
DRT Stockton, Calif. J. Robertson G. Keeler
DRO Deleware R. Basizi Corn. C. Pau]. G. They
dZ5
-------
INFORMATION S!IEET---
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThU he€.t dt4c.tLba tut t Ly ar s V G’ ajtt o&x. ded wtde* See. 6,a(2)
eML Wa.tex PCIJILt(O COPL*JLOL Act f CLean Watvt Re4to’ca.tLon Act).
GRANTEE : City of Tualatin, Oregon
TITLE OF PROJECT : Tertiary Treatment of Combined Domestic/Industrial
Wastes
PROJECT SiTE : Tu.alatin, Oregon PATE AWARVEV : March 20, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $230,800 TOTAL EST. PROJ. cosT : $323,600
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-27-0 1-67 N 1106
iio6o DL? rr 0.
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : A secondary and tertiary sewage treatment plant
will be constructed for treatment of combined municipal and industrial wastes.
The industrial waste is generated by the manufacture of dog food and will
comprise 25% of the BOD load on the treatment plant. The plant will be
operated and studied for a period of one year. The tertiary :plant (consist-
ing of flocculation, settling and filtration) will be operated with the ad-
dition of alum for phosphate removal during the critical 6 months of low
stream flow. During the remainder of the year, the secondary effluent will
receive plain filtration to maintain a very high quality effluent. The
feasibility of alternate methods of chemical sludge disposal and the economics
of tertiary treatment with phosphate removal will be studied.
F PCA P1 )JECJ OFFICER : Michael Kiado
INQflIIRTES : Castaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i ce o Raea.s.ch amd Deve6pnent
4/68 FedlAiLL Wa.tet PoLtut on Co tL&ot Aán IL6t t&t. o t
U.S. Veptttmen.t o the IntEn .wk
HGK ill I. _ —..-. .t . . I .L
W Iungto , V. C. 2024?
g E ’ 1
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—--
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu he.e.t de4ctiba bk. t ty an R V Gkan.t a& wt4ed cuidei See. 6, a(2)
FedenaZ Wa.tejt POL&ttAon Contjwe Ac2(Ctean Wa.Wt Reitona.t4on Act).
GRANTEE : City of Dallas, Oregon
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Complete Aerobic Treatment of Combined Domestic and
Industrial Wastes with Mechanical Aeration
PROJECT SITE : Dallas, Oregon VATE AWARVEV : Dec. 12, 1967
FEDERAL GRANT : e325,104 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $46 ,472
PROJECT NUMBER : WD-29-.Ol-67 PPBS NO . 1106
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : Design and build a treatment plant to demonstrate
the economics and effidiency of the completely aerobic treatment method
when applied to the treatment of combined domestic and industrial wastes
from a small municipality. The industrial waste is generated by fruit
canning operations and by plywood glue manufacture and will comprise 75%
of the BOD load on the treatment facility. The application of aerobic
digestion, mechanical surface aeration, and earthen embanionent construc-
tion will be demonstrated.
SPATUS OF PROJECT : Work ongoing.
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Sidney S. Lasswell, CH 1, Corvallis, Oregon.
INQUIRiES : Cogtgj .t the Industrial Pollution Control Brani h, DED
O Lce o Re4ea th aad VtueLop nen4
4/68 Fede*aZ WLtek PoZLiWo* Co,ttiv.ot
U.S. Ve ,,ent o the 1n2e4.Lo4
III LJ __ . _ . ti. IJ.W .
W AhJbuLtfl*; 0. C H24!
27
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki4 hee2 de4cx.Tha bsut Ly an R S V Gkant ww. *ded unde.n. Stc. 6, a(2)
Fed *aL (Uatet PoZtwt.A.on Contitot Ac t(Ctean (iJa tek Re6tokztLon Act).
GRANTEE : Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District
Green Bay, Wisconsin
TITLE OF PROJECT : “combined Industrial and Municipal Waste Treatment”
PROJECT .STTE : Green Bay, Wisconsin VAlE ALUARVEV:December 1966
FEVERAL GRANT:$251,25o TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $335,000
PROJECT NLIMBER:WpRp..60 _ O1...67 PP8S NO . 1106
11060 EDX
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT:The project will be a study, evaluation, and
determination of the effectiveness, design, and operating para-
meters of four alternative biological treatment processes and
modifications for treating combined municipal and industrial
(primarily paper mill) waste waters. A pilot waste water treatment
plant for each process will b operated in parallel. The effluent
quality, operating parameters, design variables, and cost relation-
ships for each process will be determined. Each pilot plant will
have a I to 10 gpm capacity for combined waste waters. After se-
lecting the most promising process, an existing 60 gpm pilot plant
will be modified to suit the selected process and will be operated
for a year to demonstrate its performance and to generate perfor-
mance data. The final objective is to evaluate the design, per-
formance, and use of the systems and to generalize the results for
applicability to other locations.
IN U1RIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OUi ct. o Reuanck a d V vdop tesi
FedeML Wa.te . PoLLu.t on Cont ‘tot AthwàtA . t tation
U.S. Vept’v.b en.t o the Inte. o.t
ifl L _ .L . JL .
Waihington, V. C. 20242
GW/10-68
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Th.ü hett de4cp.Lbe& MJ..t Lg an R V G taaLt aiiwi4ed unde* Sec.. 6, (a)(2)
FedMaL (I en Potlu.t.ürn CorttiioZ Act(CZwt Wa.tvt Re to*at on Act).
GRANTEE : Onondaga County, N.Y.
TITLE OF PROJECT : A Demonstration of Joint Municipal-Industrial Waste
Treatment in the Onondaga Lake Watershed
PROJECT SlTEoriondaga County, N.Y. PATE AWARVEV : 5 September, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $357,150 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $507,700
PROJECT NUMBER : wprw-66 r as NO . 1106
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
Onondaga Lake has been a receptor of domestic and industrial wastes
to such an extent that it is now in an advanced stage of eutrophication.
This project is part of a twenty million dollar program to restore
Onondaga Lake.
The objectives of this project are: (1) to demonstrate county-industry
cooperative wastewater management of municipal-industrial wastes based
on an entire watershed, (2) to demonstrate feasibility of treatment
of’ mixtures of industrial and domestic wastes, (3) to demonstrate the
treatment of an industrial waste stream with the waste effluent from
another industry, (ii.) to evaluate the effects of proposed management
and treatment methods on the economics of the treatment processes and
on the restoration of the lake.
INQMTRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O 4ee o Ruea k ajsd Pevd.pneatt
Fe4MaZ Wo.tei PoL6t on Contkot Athn4nL ticat on
U.S. Ve 4 ooAbtent o the lnWi4o*
111 IJL _ .L . 11.1! .
cgnAhiNninhl. V. C. 2024?
8168 GR
-------
INFORMATION SHEET’--’
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TIvL6 4hu.t de4c. bQ.& bni1 Lq an R S V G ttutt auw.n4€d undex Se . 6,a(2)
FedeML Wa..tvt. PoLlution ContAoL Aet(CLwi Wa.teit Re to’co.tion Act).
GRANTEE : City of South St. Paul, Minnesota
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Efficiency arid Economy of Polymeric Sewage Clari-
fication”
PROJECT SiTE : South St. Paul, Minn. VATE AWARVEV : June 15, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT:$Ll.50,000 TOTAL E T. PROJ. COST : $8A5,159
PROJECT NUMBER ; WPRD 111-01-67 PPBS NO . 1106
11060 EKK
VESCRTPTTON OF PROJECT :
The Demonstration Project includes construction of (1) New Grit Chambers
(Li. units) two for industrial wastes, one for sanitary sewage and one for
either industrial or sanitary wastes. These grit chambers will allow
sewage to be treated individually or in combination of the two basic
sewages in the treatment process following grit removal; (2) Mechanical
flash mix-facilities, laboratory and utility building improvements and
the necessary piping and other appurtenant construction. The City will
also construct an interceptor sewer, sludge ejector and pumping station
in conjunction with the demonstration project but is not a part of this
demonstration grant request. The project objectives are to determine the
increased purification attainable by treating industrial wastes (packing
house), sanitary sewage, combined sanitary sewage, and stormwaters or
combinations of such wastes with polyelectrolytes and floe “weighting
INQJAIRIES : Coiu ge. the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O c.ce o Reiea. h a.id Veue2opnen.t’
/6g Fede’caL Wa te.& Pollution Con.Ur.oL Athnint atton
U.S. Vepwtbtent o the Tn te 4o’t
I.JL t.. ILU . .
Wa.dh.ington, V. C. 20242
HGK
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki. s 6kee de4c. .A .be. b& t y an R 5 l Gtan.C aiuii ded unde.n. Sec 6 tJ
FedeMZ (Ua.te. Poth&ti.on Coivt’tot Ae.t(Ctean Wa.tvt Ru1o’ca.te1 n Ac.t).
GRANTEE : City of Hagerstown, Maryland
TITLE OF PROJECT : A pratreatruent Study on Combined Industrial-Municipal
Waste Waters.
PRO TCCT irr . Hagerstown Sewage Treatz nt P1ar t
Hegerstown, Maryland IIATE AWAKYtV : March 15, 1968
R:VERAL GRANT : Requested $320,890 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1I.27,853
PROJECT NUMBER : WPHD 1 9-01-67 PPR _ S NO . 1106
11060 EJD
VESCR1PTION OF PROJECT : This project is to evaluate pre-treatment techniques
for rextile dyeing wastes. The dye wastes are reduced sulfur compounds with
high immediate and ultimate oxygen demand that cannot be satisfied in
an activated sludge system. The pre-treatment technique is to provide initial
oxidation by diffused aeration, chlorination, and the separate additions of
sodium nitrate and potassium permanganate. Animoniation will also be used.
The project will be for two years and include a waste source investigation,
detailed baseline analyses, construction of the pre-treatment facilities
and full scale paralleling of the treatment system, and evaluation of the
pre-treatment techniques.
INQUIRiES : Con.taet the Industrial Pollution Control Btanch, DED
O i ce 06 Re ewcth aa’4 Vevetopnen.t
Fede.taZ Wo2et PotZu.t on Conf wt AthnAntJtati on
U.S. Vepan.*inen.t 06 the
Hz 8/68 V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu ohee.t dew2be b’vA.t Ly an R S V G an t auwp.ded u,nde* Sec. 6, a(2)
FedeJtLTZ Wa.tet PoZZut.on Co,it,tot Aet(CLwt Wa Wt Re toM.tLon Aet).
GRANTEE : city of Grand Forks, N th Dakota
P.O. Box 1518
Grand Forks, North Dakota
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Controlled Treatment of Combined Potato Processing-
Municipal Wastes by Anerobic Fermentation, Aerobic
Stabilization Process
PROJECT SiTE : Grand Forks, N.D. VATE ALUARVEV : JIlL 1 7 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $389, 1178 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $796, 901i
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-2o6-ol-m. PPBS NO.1106
11060 DJB
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : A tuil scale 14.5 mgd demorE trat ion and evaluation
of the joint treatment of municipal sewage in conjunction with potato
processing wastes using several pretreatment methods prior to final treat-
ment in existing stabilizations ponds. The pretreatment methods include
anerobic and aerated treatment, in series, anerobic treatment alone, and
aeration alone, under varying seasonal waste load conditions.
In addition to determining the moat efficient operation of the pretreat-
ment methods, their effects on the conventions], stabilization ponds will
be extensively determined.
iNQ UiRiES : Coat c..t the Industrial Pollution Control Br r ch
OU4ce o Re eaitch. amd Oevelopnent
FedeMZ Wa.tet PoUu.t2on Con(jtot Adn notJcat.on
8/68 U.S. VtpO .bIeSI.C o the Intek4o)L
1P1 L ,.. __ .i. , _ . JLLI .
HGK W h.UtçtOII, V. C. 20j42
3Z
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4he t de csv2be MA.t4LLJ an R S P G agLt asw..tded undiJL Sec. 6, u_
Fede*gt Wa.ttk PoZLu.t on Co,itnoL A t(Ctwi Wa.tvt Reo.toM.t on Act).
GRANTEE : city of Erie
Erie, Penns rlvania
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Joint Treatment of Domestic Sewage and Pulp
and Paper Mill Industrial Wastes.”
PROJECT SiTE : Erie, Pa. PATE AWARVEV : JUN 2 0 1968
FEDERAL GRAWr : $88,230 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $333,674
PROJECT NU* ER PRD _ 223 _ ol _ 68 PP8S NO . 1106
11060 EOC
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project s a 20 GPM pilot plant study to determine the
feasibility of combining the treatment of normal domestic
sewage and the weak wastes from a neutral sulfite semichemical
pulp and p per mill.
One of the pr 1 ’ y parameters of study will be the possible
up ake of sewage neutrients by the treatment with equal volumes
of the neutrient deficient pulping wastes. Full economic and
design factors will be developed.
INOJIZRIES : ConCaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J e o Re6ea*L* amd DeveLop ieiit
FedeML UIaten. Poth&t on Coat’toL Ath,sà,4o a.t on
U.S. Vep *.bteitt o At inten. ok
lit Irdj,. _ .t.... LW .
Idrni .s. .#* 1) 2074!
G :5/68 33 -.
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo 4hee.t d exLbe h’u 4t an R S V G/wivt auiz.tde..d undVL Sec. 6, a(2)
Fede’taZ Wa te’i Po.Uwtc on Cont. oZ Act (CZegn Wcvte/L Re o ’uvt2oii Act).
GRANTEE : CIT ( OF JACKSONVILLE, ARKA.NSAS
TITLE OF PROJECT : tTDemonstratiofl of a Facility for the Biological
Treatment of Complex Ch].oropbenolic Wastes.
PROJECT SITE : Jacksonville, Arkansas PATE AWARPED : May 17, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $153,569 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $243, 313
PROJECT flW!BER : WP1 D 246-01 PPBS NO . 1106
VESCR 1PT 1ON OF PROJECT :
A full scale (2—4 MGD) demonstration and evaluation of the joint treat-
ment of industrial herbit ide and municipal wastes, by the use of a
municipal biological system composed of: primary clarification, bio—filters,
aerated and stabilization ponds. The herbicides are of the chloro and chloro—
oxyacetic acid derl.viatives of phenol. Investigations will be conducted
to determine how the concentration of the phenolics in a receiving stream
can be reduced to a level below the tests and odor thresho]iI, also to in-
vestigate the biological factors related to the removal of the herbicides
during treatment. Suitable ‘methods are to be developed for the ide.itification
of the various herbicide Qompounds. The adequacy of nutrient values in the
joint waste to allow complete bio—processing of chiorophenolics and related
compounds will a o be demostrated
iNQUIRIES : Con.tae.t .tke Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Lce o ReoecAck ai d V ve1øpnen.t
Fedei .a.t Wa tex PoL&i.Uon Con.tn.oe Athn.ôvtStkat on
U.S. Vepa.t.tment o the In.texLo’L
JIJO T.J.L... ;i, _ , _ • (LU .
8/68 Wa4h.Lngton, V. C. 20242
GR
-------
INFORMATION SHEET’-’—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4hee t deoci,ibe& b A.t Zq an R g V G’tant aMw .n4ed unda 6, (a2)
Fedeta.L Wa.ten. PoZ1u.tLon ContxoZ Ac t(CLean WCdCUL Ruto’ca.t on Act).
GRANTEE : Harriman Utility Board
P. 0. Box 434
Harriman, Tennessee 37748
TITLE OF PROJECT:t,Treatmeflt of Combined Sewage and Neutral Sulfite
Seinichemical (NSSC) Pulp and Paper Mill Wastes by High—Rate Biological
Filtration and Extended Aeration.”
PROJECT SiTE: VATE ADJARVEV : Jan. 17, 1969
Harriman, Tennessee
FEVERAL GRANT: TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST :
$238,905 $322,540
PROJECT NUMBER: PPBS NO .
11060 DBF 1106
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT :
iectObie . j : To investigats the significant factors affecting
the treatment of combined municipal sewage and NSSC pulp and paper mill
wastes by high rate biological filtration and extended aeration,
separately or in combination, and to establish design criteria, operating
parameters and treatment efficiencies.
Grant_Dura : two (2) years
INQUIRiES : Con tag.C tIndustrial Pollution Control Branch, DAST
O6 i.ce o Re a*ck aaid Vevetopnent
Fede’caL Wa.t,.’t PoLZuV,on Con.ttot Athn n ti a.tion
U.S. yap . eat o the In.te’ 4ok
iii I.J.L _ . .1 .,. çjjj•
1/69 fIaIngton, V. C. 20242
GRW
-------
JrS FORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL4 4he et de .nib o b € Lg an R V G’wjtt ai’.wtde.d unde.’L Se.c. 6, (a)( 2)
FezkML Wc .tex PoUt .t on Confjwt Ac..t(CZegn Wcvte Re. to’ a.t on Ac t1.
GRANT Village of Walton
‘ Village Hall
21 North Street
Walton, N.Y. 13856
TITLE OF PROJECT : t ’Dynsmic Process Development for Biological Treatment
of Whey Bearing Wastes
PP.OJECT STTE : Walton, New York DATE AWARDEV : Feb. 18, 1969
hastings on the Hudson, N.Y.
FEDERAL GRAWr : $52,730 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $80,01 1.7
PROJECT NWI8ER : iio6o DUJ PPBS NO . 1106
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Efforts of this one year bench and pilot study will be concentrated in
resolving problems associated with biological treatment of wastes from
the mannfacture oi’ cheese and associated dairy products. Frequency
response techriiqt es w 1l be employed in the development of activated
sludge systems with stable culture separation characteristics. Odor
control technique will be evaluated in packed tower trickling filter
studies. A selected process will be employed in an on site pilot plant.
INQUIRiES : Contact .the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OUJ_ct o RI . eLVLth o.j d Veveop’nent
Fede .’LaL W4tte . Polhttion Co,vt&oL Ajvi. ktztLon
U.S. V pa’iJine.nt o ç th lnte’ io’L
2/69 Wa4Ithlg.ton, V. C. 20247
HGK
-------
I NI•’ORMATION S} ET
Feb. 5, 1969
RESEAI CH, DEVELOP NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date th b’ Rc Jcaccd
This Pcoject is a Grant , under Section 6, (a 2 )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
The City of Macon
City Hall
Macon, Georgia 31201
Emo r C. Matthews
Executive Secretary
pard of Water Commissioners
‘ToO Third Street - Macon, Georgia 31201
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Pilot study of Treatment of Combined Municipal and Industrial
Wastes in Selected primary and biological secondary facilities
for the Reduction of Waste Materials Discharged to Receiving
Streams.”
PROJECT SITE : Macon, Georgia
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NU ER : 11060 DPI)
DATE OFFERED : Feb. 3, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWABDED1:Feb . 19, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
7WPCA G nt
r Contract
Amount
From:
Thru:
$ 171,8 1.5
$128,883.75
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Project Objectives: The objective of this study is to develop information
relating to the joint treatment of municipal and industrial wastes. The
industrial wastes will be selected wastes from both pulp and paper, and
wood products companies. The study will be accomplished on a pilot plant
basis.
Grant Duration: one year
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Rescarch and Deve3ropment
Federal Water Pollution Control Admi.nistration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, Li. . O242
37
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
INarne and Addreis)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
GRW 6Ii
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TILLa h et de.6c be4 Im2t ty a* R S V Gwi.t a xdedwtde.n. Sec. 6, (a)(2)
Fede. aL Wa.teA PoLtwt !on ContjtoL Aet(CLwt Wa,tet Re to a2 on Ac.t).
GRANTEE : City CounoiJ
City of Stockton
Stockton, California
! 1I LE OF PROJECT : “Upstream Packing House Waste Treatanent Demonstration,
City of Stoc kton”
PROJECT SITE : Stocktoh, California PATE AWARVLV : Feb. 25, 1969
FEDERAL GRAWI:$38l,078 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1,085,970
PROJECT NUMBER : 1106 —DRT PPBSNO . 1106
VESCRTPTION OF PROJECT : A full sqale (2 MGD) development and demonstration
of upstream treatment of packinghouee waste by use of aerobic treatment
in a combination use of high rate activated s].udge and in—sever treatment.
The complex is anticipated to result in the reduction of BO]) load to
the municipal system of 0 percent and demonstrate the utility value of
the conveying sewer line to further treat sewage and to reduce capitol
expenditures over a typical activated slt Ige plant otherwise required.
It is intended to consider the use of the Kebr process for partial
upstream /treatment during pilot stiz3ies.
lNQjIIRlES Con.tae.a the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O h .e o Re e vuth awL Veuelopnen.t
Fe4MZ Wa CC1L Po&u.t on Cont’toL MjnbsLi*jpa.tjon
2”6 Ve tb,te,tt o the Inte.t on
01 LJ __ .t. - - fLu. .
Wa Ithigton, P. C. 20242
HGK 38
-------
iNFORMATION Sl-1EET - -’
RESEARCH & DEyELOPMENT GRANT
TJz .L ehe e t d .scit .Lbe,3 bii) ,Ly a t R 6 V G.t u t a thd d w’idvc. S c. 6,
Feeiw.C. Wo..teic. Po .Uu.tLo;L Co .t’Lo Ac (C- e t, U’a, c1L Ac ..t .
GRAHTEE : Delaware River Basin Commission
25 Scotch Road - P.O. Box 360
Trenton, New Jersey J8603
TITLE OF ThWJECT : eepwater - Pilot Plant - Engineering and Interceptor
Feasibility Study
PRO.flCT SITE : Salem County, N. 3. VAlE M’JM OEO : April 1, 1969
FEVE ALG! A 1T:$646,7 3O TOT’ L EST. PI OJ. COST : $995,650
pR&1 CT !W ER : 11%O DRØ PPBS 110 . 1106
VESCRiPT1OIJ OF P WJECT : A pilot plant and engineering study to develop a
Eèmical -bio1ogicar Featn1ent process for joint industrial-municipal
wastes, capable of attaining at least .88 to 93 percent removal of major
pollutants. Design, operating and cost information is to be obtained for
a 1 MGD regic nal treatment complex. 1 o test an evaluate Advanced
Waste Treatment processes for final effluent polishing. To develop
suitable cost apportionment formulations for the treatment of various
industrial wastes by a joint regional complex operated by an Interstate
Agency. To develop and demonst rate the requirements for organizing,
operating and administering a regional facility by an Interstate Agency.
111 UIRiES : Co,ttac the Ip dustrial Pollution Control Branch
OW o P e.a’Lcit cc14 V v nojt t
FQ4C/LI LZ Wa-tcit POULL .tA ..O4 Cor . .twC. A4.t.kctt on
u;s.
633 lr d.i . uv Ave .. N.(I.
Wa4k.Ln ot,, V. C. 20242
3,
-------
PPB 1201
!E ETAL & METAL PRODUCTS
12010
Letters Tb ____ PM
1343-01 DOT U. of Water].oo—Byerley A. Printz E. Dulaney
DIM U. of Utah—Miller J. Rouse E. Dulaney
1472-01 1)HP Clarkson College of A. Printz E. Dulaney
Tech. —Jellinek
WPRD
41 Chem. Separations Corp. J. Fisher W. Lacy
168 DUL Arnico Steel Corp. R. Feder E. Dulaney
169 Arinco Steel Corp. R. Feder E. Dulaney
201 EIE Meta]. Finishers Foundation J. Ciancia E. Dulaney
222 DSA S.K. Williams Co. A. Printz E. Dulaney
237 DPF Volco Brass & Copper J. Ciancia E. Dulariey
244 DMF The Beaton & Corbin Co. J. Ciancia E. Dulaney
270 DF S RAI Res arch Corp. L. Kahn E. Dulaney
208 DRE Interlake Steel Corp. A. Printz E. I)ulaney
DNF CF&I Steel Corp. F. Pfeffer E. Dulaney
DRH Minnesota Pollution Control A. Printz E. Dulaney
Agency
ED! Am. Iron & Steel Inst. F. Pfeffer E. Dulaney
DTQ Weii’ton Steel E. Dulaney
1 F Alabama Water Improvement E. Lomasney E. Dulaney
Commission
4’
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR BLAST FURNA CES & STEEL K [ LLS
PPB 1201: Metals & Metal. Products
Hudson Charn
peake-St. squ hanna
Puerto Rico Vir jin I
LlsIan4 i
U. S. c.f tw
C-- .
Centi
-------
INFO1 MiViiON SIl EET —
ESEARCII & I)J .VJ.LO1’MENf GRAN’I
Th h: e2 dc4 L thc4 biz.L’.( zj Itn 1 fl P G’ 1 aii t (WXUL(2c 1 ulldCJL Sec.. 5 ,Research,
Fcdc; 1 c 1:. (t’ t JL PoU’t Lon Co t oC Aa. (CJ. can Wa.tcJL Rwto’ta.Uon Aa.t}.
G: / WiEC: University of Waterloo
Dr. John J. Byerley
TTu:.EOrrP Oj Ca : Detoxication of Cyanide Wastes by Electrooxidation
T’.WJECT SITE : Waterloo, Ontario V1 TE / 1 WARDEV : November 26, 1968
1C LC ATh:$l2,h29 TO j7j , p j, COST : $214,O 7
P. ’OJLCi_11 1 WP-13 1 43-01 PP3S RO . 1201
1201 DOT
Vacirfi1O ! or Oj CT: The objective of this project is to develop an
process for destroying cyanide ion
in dilute cyanide wastes. This process is to be:
a) Capable. of purifying large volumes of cyanide wastes by reducing
cyanide ion conSentration to less than 1 ppm.
b) Suited to operation by semi- kil1ed personnel in ma11 scale
operations.
c) Adaptable to continuous or semi-continuous operation.
TN(jUflZIES: Co, a.e..éthe Industrial Pollution Control Branch
— O Jj2.Q. o e4wfl ch a id VcvcLopteivt
F 4C.JUL. W 2e& PofJ i2Jo t Cont&oL Acb t i 2.ôt’uu n
LISS. Vep.vt nc iC o .Che In. c.t. o;L
*IIJ L.J... _ . . ...., U.I! .
W 4hng. oa P. C. 20242
EID/ll/68 43
-------
INFORMATION SIIEET -
RESEARIII & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLs hee2 de c/iibeA bnit( 1 ty an R S V Gn aitt a wcd d undeii Se . 5, Research
F de7LaL Wa.te. . PoUwtLon ContjLoL Ae2(Ctea.n WaWt Re o’ta.tLon Ac. I.
GRANTCE ; University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dr. Jan D. Miller
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Depression of Pyrite in Sulfide Flotation Systems
Without the use of Cyanide
PROJECT SiTE : Salt Lake City, Utah PATE AWARVEV : January 29, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $12,663.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$13,559.0O
PROJECT NLJM5ER : 12010 DIM PP8S NO 1201
Date Effective : January 1, 1969
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
The objective of this project is to develop a technique for the depression
of pyrites in the froth flotation of sulfide ores by the addition of organic
salts in place of commonly used cyanides. The oxidation potential of pure
systems will be varied to determine explicitly the conditions which must be
imposed to depress pyrites. Batch flotation tests on two hatural sulfide
ores containing pyrite will then be conducted to determine the feasibility of
pyrite depression in a natural system under conditions prescribed for the pure
system.
TUQ.UIRIES : CoivtaeA the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OWt o Re. owr ck and VeueLopneitt
Fede.scaL WC2UL PoL ut on Cos2jtoL A,ij tatZon
U.S. Ve pa.n mQavt o . the InWAwL
.i....... .e,
RN1 1/68 Waohiigton,V C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TILt6 6&ee.t deic.’t.t.be bn2t Ly au R S V G’ta t.t aiuaAded unde . Ste. 5, (Research)
FedMa.L W z.te/i Po1Jut.i.on ( onttoZ Act(CLeau WaLe.’t RutonjttLon Act).
GRANTEE : Clarkson College of Technology
Pot sdazn, New York 13676
Dr. H.H.G. Jellinek
TiTLE OF ‘PROJECT ; Metal Removal/Recovery from Polluted Water by
Complexation with Linear Polye lectrolyte s
PROJECT SITE : Potsdam, New York VAlE ALUARVEP : Februaxy 13, 1969
FEDERAL GRANT : $2I ,328.O0 TOThL E.ST. PROJ. COST : $27,61 5.00
PROJECT NUM8ER : 12010 DHP PP8S MO . 1201
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT: Project Period : March 1, 1969—Feb. 28,197C
The complexation of metal ions with polyacids to form water soluble
complexes and subsequent precipitation with polybases will be
investigated. Metals are to be recovered by destroying the complex
at low pH. Reuse of the polyelectrolyte will be investigated. The
objective of the project will be to demonstrate that the above described
technique is an economically and technically feasible method of treating
wastewaters containing widely varying metal concentrations.
This grant is for the first year of grantee’s anticipated three year
project.
TN UlRiES : Contdc.t tht Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i.ce o Rto a*ek gaud Vtv iopiien
Fede’tat Wa te’t PoIlu.tLDn Co*twL Athn it ta.tia*
U.S. VepaA .bitai.t o the Iatt A.. O&
JHIL .
ELD/12/ 68 WaML4fl9tOiI, V. C. 20242
45
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkio ohu.t dtóc4Lbe6 bnA.t j an R 6 V Gto.iit au.w 4td undut. Sec. 6L( )
Fedeiw2 Wa te’t PoZZu on Co WtoL Aet(Cteaai Wa.teit Ra o*a.t on Ac t).
GRANTEE : Chemical Separations Corporation
Bus Terminal Road
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
TITLE OF PROJECT : Acid Pickle Liquor Wastes Treatment Utilizing Advanced
Ion Exchange Techniques
PROJECT SiTE : Oak Ridge, Tennessee v n M&IARVEV : December 20, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $50,400.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $72,000.00
PROJECT NUMSER : WPRD 41(R)-O1-68 pp 1201
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
The purpose of this grant is to determine the feasibility of using con-
tinuous ion exchange to strip Fe from pickling wastes and regenerate
the acid for reuse. The iron will be converted to a high grade Fe 2 0 3
for use in metallurgical processing as by-product.
Project Period: 15 months
lNQ IIRlES : Contact tkt Industri 1 Pollution Control Branch, DEl)
O Ja o Raea.tck aid Develop,vent
ELD 8/68 Fed QML ( te.t PoLtu.tion Cont ‘rot a 4 thiL ’ra.tiøn
U.S. Vtpi4bnen o .tI&e 7nte*. o*
J1O L _ C _ .l _ . IJWL
Wa&hLngton, V. C. 20242
4’
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENTS GRANT
Tkts hu2 deAcirAba M.L1 ZIJ an R IV Gkan t a&w.n ded undeA Seg. 6b
Fede*a.L Wateit. PoLLution ConttoL Ae2(CLean Wa.tuL Re .to’tzztLon
GRANTEE : Armco Steel Corporation
MiddletoWn, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : ? t atment of Acid Rinse Waters”
PROJECT SITE : Midd let owfl, Ohio PATE AWARVEV: ’ May 16, 1 9 6
FEVERAL GRANT : $547,500 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$l,784,800
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 168-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201
-. — l2olb DUL
PESCRZPTION OF PROJECT: O T PERIOD : 1 9 to
The project provides for construction, operation, tests, and reports
on facilities to treat 1500 gpm of acid rinse waters produced by the
hydrochloric acid pickling of strip-steel preparatory to cold-rolling.
The treatment process will consist of limestone neutralization,
aeration, coagulation, sedimentation, sludge recirculation, vacuum
filtration of the excess sludge, and effluent equalization.
All or nearly all of the acid and the compounds of iron will be
removed by the treatment process. The chloride content of the waste
is not changed by this process and may be such that dilution with
other available wastes will be required in order to meet the state’s
proposed standards regarding total dissolved solids.
lNQ JTRIES : Contac.t Litelndustrial Pollution control Branch, DED
OULi e o Rewxch amd Ve.uelop9?esIt
FedeAat Wa..ten. PoLtu.t on Contiwl Aán ni4t’ta.tion
U.S. Vepan.titent o the ln exw
£33 LA. L i i ,. U kr
Wa köigton, V. C. 20242
ED/Feb.’68 47
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo ohee.t de c.tLb bnA.t Zy wt R S V Gn.an.t auwzded undex Sec. 6(L,)
Fe4uuxL Wa teIL PoL6tJot Contiioe Act(CLean Wc2ei& Re6.toM.t4.oPi Act).
GRANTEE : Arinco Steel Corporation
Middletown, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Waste Water - Waste Oil Mixtures
PROJECT SiTE : Ashland, Kentucky VAlE AWARVEV : May 16, :1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $209,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1,541,720
PROJECT NLU48ER : WPRD 169-01-68 PPES NO . 1201
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT PERIOD : Nov. 1, 1967 to Oct. 31,196 ?
This project provides for design, operation, studies, and reports on
a full scale demonstration facility to be built by Arnico for the treat-
ment of 4.6 ngd of oil-water emulsion wastes from a five-stand cold-
rolling mill. A five chemical treatment method of coagulation, floc-
culation, dissolved air flotation for oil—water separation, and sludge
incineration will be used. The project schedule provides one year for
constru.ction and one year for operating studies of parameters and re-
porting of results.
1NQ UiRiES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O ice o Re eatck ar4 Vevelopnent
FedeM2 Wa.tet PoZlu.t4on Con.t’toL Adntth.L4tkat Qn
U.S. Vepa/ tesvt o the bLtQA..W/L
Eli iJ .... _ .t.i. (LW. .
Wa6h4nqton, V. C. 20242
48
ELD/Feb 68
-------
INFORMATION SHEET — -’
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkA6 4heet de c..t’be b g ey an R g V G’wivC au&vtded ,.utdeit Sec.. 6(b),
Fede aL Waten. PoFlat4on Co WtoL Aet(CL€an Wa.Wt Re oniit. on Act).
GRANTEE : Metal Fini hers’ Foundation
Upper Montclair, New Jersey
TITLE OF PROJECT : tiAn Investigation of Techniques for the Removal of
Chromium and Cyanides from Electroplating Wastes.”
PROJECT SiTE : Upper Montclair, N.J.VATE AWARVEV March 27, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $98,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $145,000
PROJECT NUMBER:WPRD 201-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201 DURATION2 2 years
VESCRZPTZON OF PROJECT: PROJECT PERIOD : to April 30,1970
The Metal Finishers 1 Foundation will conduct a two-phase research
and demonstration project on methods for economically treating cyanide
and chromium wastes from small plating shops. Phase I will include
(a) a “State of the Art” review of recovery techniques, (b) accumu—
lation of data on waste stream compositions, (c) selection of tech-
niques for bench scale study and selection of extractants and complexing
agents, (d) bench scale experimental investigation of selected techniques
and (e) evaluation of the test results and preparation of recommendation
This phase will require one year.
Phase II will consist of (a) the design of theprocess and the processing
equipment, (b) acquisition and installation of thee uipment*i an elec-
troplating plant, (c) operation of the demonstration plant to accumulate
data, and (d) the evaluation of the data and preparation of reports.
The work will be performed by subcontract to the Battelle Memorial Institute
at Columbus, Ohio. Various treatment methods; including liquid-liquid ex-
traction, ion flotation, and precipitate flotation; will be investigated and
compared.
INQUIRiES : Con.tae.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW e o Reawcch a,4 VeveLopnen.t
FedvLaL Wtvte’L Pothi.t Lan Co,vt v.ot Athr iJvL6 t’ca.tLon
U.S. Vepatbten.t o the Inta.Lat
. . v r’i
ELD:2/68 C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SUEET——
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk4.4 4heet de c tLbe.o b/,2t Ztj an R S P G tajtt aiuvtded undvt See. 6 (b),
Ftdvtn2 Wa te.& PotLu.t.Lon Contjto Ac.t(CL an Wa.t Re ton.a.tion ActJ.
GRANTEE : S. K. Williams Company
2370 N 32nd Street
Milwaukee, WisconsIn 53210
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Electroplating Waste Treatment and Water Reuse”
PROJECT SITE : Milwaukee, WiscônsiflATE AWARVEV : July 17, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $87,750 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $157,306.80
PROJECT NUMBER : ‘WpRD222 —0].—Ri-68 PPBS NO . 1201
12010 DSA
A ‘ROJECT PERIOD: Jul. 17, 1968 to Mar. 17,1970.
v i LrJ wN iF PROJECT : The S. K. Williams Company proposes to in-
stall a chemical pre-rinse type waste treatment plant (designed
by Lancy Laboratories) to treat the drag-out from various op-
erations in their new job-plating plant. Each section of the
waste treatment facility will be expected to alternately or
simultaneously treat the wastes from three to seven different
processing operations. Sludges will be disposed of by landfill
and 80-90% of the rinse waters will be reused. The blowdown
rinse waters will be free of significant quantities of tèxic
substances.
The project period will be 8 months for construction and 12
months for operation, maintenance, and poet construction
studies and reports.
INQUTRIES : Co ttact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O cce o Re4ewt th aatd Vevelopneiit
Fede.M2 Wate’L PoUu.t on Con wt Adn utitztLD,i
U.S. Pepaitb ’nt o the !nteX. o4
JiJI I...L..... _ .Li.. LILI .
KLD/6—6 8 W iington, P. C. 20f42
50
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL& ahee.t deAeaibe bn.Le tq an R V Gi aj*.C wov ded undvr. Sec. 6(b)
FedeMZ Wa.ten. Potlwtion Conttot Act(Cteaii Wa.WL R ..6toMJ4On Ae.t).
GRANTEE Volco Brass and Copper Company
Kenilworth, New Jersey 07033
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Treatment Recovery, and Reuse of Copper Wire Mill
Pickling Wastes.”
PROJECT SITE : icenilworth, N. . VATE AWAROEV : June 28, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $i ,ooo TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $177,159
PROJECT NUMBER : WPIID 237-01-68 PPSS NO . 1201
12010 DPF PROJECT PERIOD : June 28, 1968 to
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : Volco Brass and Copper Compax TPD
of copper and copper al].oy wire. Wastes from the pickling, bright dipping,
and drawing ope rations consist of spent treating solution dumps, drag-
out, and rise waters containing acids; alkalies; and hexavalent chromium,
copper,fluoride, and copper comp1e d.ng anmioniuin ions. Lancy Laboratories
has designed a process and waste treatment system which will recover the
copper electrolytically, will regenerate• the treating solutions, and will
permit reuse of 954% of the waste water as process water. The process
18 free of any significant sludge disposal problem. The project is to
be completed in one year.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Inc!ustrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWct o Reu1v L* and Vtve opnent
FedIML a tv PoUu.t on Cont’toL Athnbi6t a t Loii
ELD 5/68 U.S. Depa4bieatt o At I.ie t o
at i... ...... . ... ri.w .
Wa6hLngton, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk4. 4he de oc.vbe. 6 a Lq t R V G aat aiiwrded wtdvt See. 6(b),
FedeMl C& t Po2lwtij,n CoRit’Loe Act(CLwt Watet ReetoM.tLc l Act).
GRANTEE : The Beaton and Corbin Mfg. Co.
South ingt on, Connecticut
TITLE OF PROJECT : Ghemical Treatment of Plating Waste for Elimination
of Chromium, Nickel and Metal Ions
PROJECT SiTE : Southington, Conn. OATh 4LUARVCV :
June 3, 1968
FEVERAL GR4NT : $37,250 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $58,2?0
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 244-01-68 PPBS MO . 1201
12010 1 F
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT:ThIS is an industrial waste treatment project
for the installation and demonstration of a chemical pre-rinse
system fo the removal of toxic materials from the wastes from a
small electroplating plant. The treated effluent is expected to
have a pH of 6.5 to 8.5 and will contain less than: 0.1 ppm of
chromium, copper, nickel, or zinc; 100 ppm of chlorides or nitrates;
200 ppm of sulfates; 5 ppm of BOD; and will be color and odor free.
Approximately two_thirds of the treated effluent will be reused for
plating rinse water.
Precipitates of toxic metal ions will be produced by the chemical
treatment of the segregated waste streams from the various plating
lines. Sludges containing these precipitates will be routed to
sludge drying beds. Dried sludges will be disposed of by landfill.
There aze over three thousand similar sources of stream pollution
in the New England area alone and over twelve thousand plating
plants across the nation. This project will provide technical and
economic data on an effective waste treatment method. It is antici-
pated that this information will be of value to many firms, who be-
cause of insufficient funds, could not themselves undertake the
engineering and development costs required.
PROJECT PERIOD : June 3, 1968 to Fe bruary 3, 1970
ZNQJIIRIES : Con.tae the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i.a o R ta* IL a d Vtve.Zopneiit
Fedv& L Wite’t PoZ&t4o,t Cov t’w Ao,thtL ’ca tiopt
US. De.pMb,esi o the li t.teM.c4
. Jt. _ .. .‘L 1.
WuIth, .ton, V. C. 2024?
ELD 4/68
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TI.Lo iheet de4eJfi.be4 bki.gf, y an R 6 V Gtwvt aziwided undut Sec. 6(b),
Fedenat WaUk PoLtutLon Co,WtoL Aet(Ctetzn Wate 0 ’t Re. toMJ Lon Act).
GRANTEE : RAI Research Corp.
36-40 37th Street
Long Island City, N.Y. 11101
TiTLE OF PROJECT:’?Treatment of Cyanide Rinse Waters by Electrodialysis”
PROJECT SiTE : Long Island City, N.YPATE AWARVEV Nov. Li, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $58,685 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $83,235
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-2 70-01-68 PP8S NO . 1201
12010 DFS PROJEXJT PERIQD:Nov . 11, 1968—Jul. 11, 19t
VESCR! O 4 OF PROJECT:This project provides for a laboratory study
of the ap lication of electrodialysis to the treatment of a cyanide
solution which simulates the rinse water from a copper “strike”
electroplating operation. The objective is to develop design para-
meters and to define economic factors as a basis for a later demon-
stration program with an industrial plating firm. The project period
will be eight months.
iNQUIRiES : Con.t t the Industrial Pol1u tion. Control Br nch, DED
O J.ce o Reeea*e.h am veuaopvienJ
FedeMZ Wateti PctZu.t ion Con.twt Ath wu. t a .on
U.S. Vepa4bteiit o the Inte 4oi
a tJ 1 tL
ELD/6-68 Wa4h4J g ton,V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk A £he de e..c 2be6 b . ty a pt R P Gi tt oi wicde4 undet See. 6 (b),
Fede.4tLZL Wa.te’t Po11u21.on Co Wtoe Act(CLwt Wa.tei& Re o,ta.t2opt Act).
GRANTEE : Interlake Steel Corporation
310 South Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60601
TiTLE OF PROJECT : pollution Control of Blast Furnace Gas Washer
Through Bee ircu] .at ion
PROJECT SiTE : Chicago, Illinois PATE ADJARVEV : January 27, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $175,200. TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$525, 6 00 .
• PROJECT NLfMBER : 208-01-68 PPBS NO . 1202.
• 12010 DRE
PESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : The full scale demonstration project will provide
additional facilities for the treatment and reuse of 7.2 mgd of blast fur-
nace gas washer water from the venturies and coolers on t vo blast furnaces.
The water before treatment contains 700 ppm of suspended solids, 1630 ppm
of tote]. solids, 3ppm cyanidet , end 100 ppb of phenols. n anipn%ic poly-
electrolyte will be used to improve recovery of lMgiletite ( 30 ) and re-
moval of cyanide a in the primary clarifier. In addition, polyphosphates
and chlorine will be used ar required to prevent c hyth’ogen cyanide hazard
in the vacinity of the cooling tower. A new cooling tower will reduce the
water temperature and further reduce cyez3ides thus permitting reuse of most
of the water. The cooling tower blowdown will be used to cool slag. The
b].ovdown stream will be evaporated and leave its dissolved solids on the
slag pile. The blowdown rate will be determined by the allowable a1k 1 inity
of the recirculated ater. The water is passed tbrough cooling coils in
the walL; of the blast furnaces before routing through the venturies. This
is expected to limit the a].halinity to 500 ppm.
The project period ot 18 raonths is based on anticipated c letion of con-
struction in July 1969 and rinal Report by August 1, 1970.
INQUI RI ES : Con.taze.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DZD
O4 i2e o Reo th ae d Vevdopn ?.s.t
FedvLat Wate1 PoLZ &t o Co 1itoZ Athc aiü Lürn
U.S. Vepe4tseiit o .the
In LJ LEu- M .
.D 11/68 W 3hLngtot, P. C. 20242
$4
-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk &hee.t de c.t.Lbe& bn.ct ,Ly an R S V G .a,tt oi iwukd andeA Sec. 6(b)
Fedc &aL Wa .tut PoUwtü,n ContjtoL Ae2(CZean Wa.te’t Re.stojTta.tLon AetI.
GRANTEE : CF&I Steel Corporation
P. 0. Box 1920
Denver, Colorado 80201
TITLE OF PROJECT : Research Study of Coal Preparation Plant and By Product
Coke Plant Effluents
PROJECT SiTE : Pueblo, Colorado DATE AWARDED : MAR 2 7 1969
FEDERAL GRANT : $86,500.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $205,000.00
PROJECT NUMBER : 12010 DI’IP PP8S NO . 1201
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
This project will provide for (a) a study of waste sources, volumnes, and
characteristics, (b) laboratory and bench scale studies of alternate treat-
ment processes, and (c) a study of additions to planned coal washery
filtration facilities to develop reuse possibilities of non-coking solids
and solids waste disposal. Development of methods for waste water treat-
ment to produce effluents suitable for reuse or discharge in accordance
with state stream standards will be a major objective.
The project period is seven months.
INQJJIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ce o ke.6ewv.eh aatci Vevetopnen.t
I;ede.ML Watejt PoLtu.t. on Con.titot Ath, n1 tat on
U.S. Vepa.n. iesu o the mn e.t ok
Wa8h4.ng.ton, V. C. 20242
ELD 2/69
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEAR H & DEyELOPMENT GRANT
TkLs Iiee .t do Lb b ’LL LJ cu R t V Gta.iz-t at’xvtde.d ui idv Sec. 6 b,
Fe.deM .C U)a ..tei . PoitwUon Co1 t’Lo Ac.-t(C. wji Ct’ t-te.’t ona t_Lon Ac t).
GRANTEE: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
717 De]aware Street, Southeast
Minneapolis, Minnesota 554.40
TITLE OF PROJECT: “Study of Reverse Osmosis for Treating Metal
Finishing Effluents”
PROJECT SITE : Minneapolis, Minnesota DATE AC )ARDEV : June 30, 1969
FEVERALGR,V’!T: $49,737.00 TOTAL EST. P!ZOJ. COST : $71,053.00
PROJECT !U ER : i oio DRH PPBSNO. 1201
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency proposes
to engage the North ‘Star Research and Development Institute (3100 Thirty
Eighth Ave., So., Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55406) to conduct Phase I of an
anticipated three phase — three year project. The objectives of the pro-
ject are to develop reverse osmosis CR0) for the treatment of metal finish-
ing effluents (WE), for the purposes of (a) e1i ’ninating pollutants from
effluents, (b) recovery of valuable plating materials, and (c) recovery of
waste waters for reuse.
Phase I will provide for s reen .ng of candidate embranes for effectiveness
anc compatibility in single ion applications, compatibility of support
materials, investigation of promising membranea-for improvement by modifi-
cation, and investigation of operating parameters, e.g. temperature, pressure,
thickness, strength, and permeability.
Phase II would extend the studies to mixed ion MFE ’s, life studies, and
production aspects and costs of membranes.
Phiise III would consist of scale—up studies on simulated MFE’s and sub-
sequently to actual MFE’s with generation of data for commercialization.
1NQtIIRIES Co,vtac t .the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J o R u h a ’.d
FedekciL Wa te1L PothLt. t COrJJLOL Arc t oit
U.S. V pc .ivt o .the. TnWtLo t
633 Ind r a Ava. U.CJ.
ELD 4/68 (Ua4hLn to:i, P. C. 20242
5 -’
-------
Ti’! t)RMATION SHEET
May 27, 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMBNT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr b Rc’icn rd
ThH Project is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
American Iron
150 East 42nd
New York, New
& Steel Institute
Street
York 10017
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The Armco Steel Corporation, under the sponsorship of the AISI and with the
assistance of the AISI Fellowship at Mellon Institute will design, construct,
operate, optimize, and evaluate a 1 gpm pilot facility for the three stage
biological treatment of raw ammoniacal liquors from the by—product coke plant
of Armco Steel located at Houston, Texas. A typical analysis of this waste
would indicate 1240 ppm of phenol, 60 ppm cyanide, and 6400 ppm ammonia.
The three stage biological treatment system is designed to accomplish (a)
oxidation of carbonaceous material (aerobic), (b) nitrification of nitrogenons
compounds (aerobic) and (c) nitrate reduction to nitrogen gas (anaerobic).
Laboratory testing indicates that removal of 75% of organic carbon, 99% of
phenol and cyanide and essentially all of th€ ammonia can be expected. The
pilot facility will provide the basis for the design of a full scale facility.
INQUIRIES:
ELD 5/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202)42
Si
TITLi OF PROJECT:
PROJECT SITE :
John E. Barker
Manager, Pollution Control
Armco Steel Corporation
Middletown, Ohio L 50L 2
“Biological Removal of Carbon and Nitrogen Compounds
from Coke Plant Wastes”
Houston, Texas
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12010 EDY
DATE OFFERED :
May 21, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):June 25, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA ( .nt
Dr Contr t
Amount
lrom:
‘
Thru:
$156,000
$109,200
-------
1W: \)I31ATION SHEET
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Datc tn b2 RricU/ d
ThH PcDjeci is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Wat2r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration ActJ.
GRM! TEE OR
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
Weirton Steel Division
National Steel Corporation
Box U31
Weirton, West Virginia 26062
William M. Smith
Manager, Industrial Hygiene Engineering
Weirton Steel Division
TITL : QF PROJECT : Combined Steel Mill and MunicipaiWastewaters Treatment
PROJECT SITE : Weirton, West Virginia
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12010 DTQ
DATE OFFERED:
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
FWPCA G: nt
)r Contr:.ct
-Amount
From:
Thru:
$ 163,963
$ 95 918
DEJC RIPTION OF PROJECT :
This grant supports Phase I of grantee t s anticipated three phase project to
provide an overall waste treatment system to treat effluents from an integrated
steel mill and the domestic wastes from the City of Weirton, West Va. The
mifl produces the full spectrum of steel industry wastes. Waste water volumes
currently are 226 mgd and 1.2 thgd from the mm and the city respectively.
The general approach will be to reduce volumes by providing treatment to
maximize reuse, to provide pretreatment as required for subsequent combined
treatment, toprovide combined treatment of sanitary and specific mill wastes
where a synergestic effect can be anticipated, in an expanded municipal facility,
and to provide complete treatment of the remaining wastes.
Phase I consist; of three tasks which include wastewater characteri ation and
analysis of existing facilities, accessinent of alternative treatment processes,
and detennination of the feasibility of a joint municipal-industrial waste
treatment demonstration facility. Phase I will require twelve months to eomp3ete.
IFK tJIRflS:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Watcr Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Intcrior
Washington, D. C. 202b2
5 8
ELD,6 /69
-------
I i’ ith&IATION SHEET
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to bc Helen: , - (I
Thts Project is a Class V , under Section 6(b) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Acidress)
Alabama Water Improvement Commission
State Office Building
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
R.E. Lacey, Head, Membrane Processes Section
Southern Research Institute
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
Electromembrane Process for Regenerating Acid from
Spent Pickle Liquor
Birmingham, Alabama
This project pro’vides for the experimental investigation of an electromenibrane
process for the recovery of sulfuric acid and iron or iron oxide from spent
sulfuric acid pickling liquors. The investigation will determine the techrdc i
feasibility of the process in a bench scale operation, provide engineering
data for the design of larger recovery units, and develop engineering cost
estimates to indicate the economic feasibility of the process. The bench
scale studies wifl be directed at develoinent of the configuration, mode, and
conditions of operation required to minimize power requirements.
INQUIRIES:
aD 8/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of’ Research and Development
Federfl Water Pollution Control Administration
U, S. Department of the Interior
Washington, P. C. 202142
5.9
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
TITle: OF PROJECT:
PROJECT SITE :
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12010 EQF
DATE OFFERED;
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
01 ant
r Contnct
Amount -
from: One
Year
Thru:
,
$30,000
$ 20,000
-------
LOCATION OF PRIMkRY ALUMENUM & ELECTROMETALLURGICAL PRODUCT PLANTS
PPB J201: Metals & Metal Products
Central
0’
0
tisquehanna
1 J :1
L ucrto 1c i Virgin I U. S D - t o’
I slancsj F.6rva! W : P Co ’o Ar”
-------
PPB 1202
C} MICALS & A lLIED PRODUCTS
12020
WP Letters To GPO PM
WPD
WPBD
211.8 DJI B. F. Goodrich Chem. Co. G. Horowitz G. Rey
DIS Union Corbide Corp. J. Ferguson G. Rey
D C Dept. Commerce & Indus- J. Horn G. Rey
try State of Louisiana
DJJ Lakeway Chem. Co. A. Printz G. Rey
EEQ Dow Chemical Co. J. Horn G. Hey
EAW B. I. DuPont J. Ulshoefer G. Rey
EAS Dow Chemical Co. G. Rey
EGM Farmers Chemical Co. E. Lomasney G. Hey
Contracts
1 IL_12.435 C. W. Rice & Co. F. Stein G. Rey
E li) Engineering Science, G. Putnicki G. Hey
Inc.
‘I
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR INOI ANIC CHEMt CAL INDUSTRIES
PPB 1202: Chemicals & Allied Products
/MAPNE
England
M
Estuary
Ciesapeake-Susq hanna
idcfle p t 3flt C
June 7
U. S. Oe , ’e& c
ret .’at W.) e, P0 • .•.0 I C
Hudson Champla
cE7
I , I
tPuertoR1 I Virgin
I c,I
[ isi nç j
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR OI ANIC CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
PPB 1202: Chemicals & Allied Products
Hudson Champ!a
.. De1aware Estuary
C19sa&(e-S isq ehanra
Attoflt C
Pucr or’. o
L!!i L .S
June 1! 7
U. S. ,pj •‘• .
W -- .... • .•., .,
Western
ro
cs
- waii
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt& hee.t de c. be& Lm4 t y an R S V G tan.t aiiwtded undest. Sec. 6,
FedestaL Wa.ten. PaLt4&tLo.t Co tttot Act(CLe.an Wa.tex Reoto’c&tson Act).
GRANTEE : B. F. Goodrich Chemical Company
3135 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Waste Treatment Facilities for Poly Vinyl Chloride
Manufacturing Plant
PROJECT SiTE : Salem County, N. J. PATE MUARVEV : JUL 2 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $364,900 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $823,100
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 248-01-68 PPBS NO . 1202
12020 DJI
VE CR1PTZON OF PROJECT : A development, demonstration, and evaluation
project for the bio-chemical treatment of wastewatera from a typical
poly vinyl chloride manufacturing plant, at a 0.85 mgd scale of operation.
The treatment system is to produce effluent to meet the receiving water
standards (Delaware River) of greater th.an 85% removal of BOD, turbidity
of not greater than 30 units above river water, and be free from taste
and odor producing substances.
The process will consist of chemical pre—treatment with primary sedi-
mentation, followed by activated sludge secondary treatment and a final
polishing pond. Tertiary treatment studies with activated carbon are
also contemplated to determine the extent to which the secondary effluent
will lend itself to tertiary treatment, as future Delaware River standards
may require the equivalent of tertiary treatment.
iNQ UiRiES : Con.tae4 Indi strial Pollution Control Branch
O .ce o Reeea.teh. aad VeveLopneiit
Fedvca2 Wa.teit PoLt &tcon Con2’wt
U.S. Vep.vLbtent o the inten4cn
633 ind ne Ave. N.W.
Wa6huigton, P. C. 2024f
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki o akef.t dac.rtLbeo bn. t Ly a t R S P Gkajtt auwidc4 widen. See. 6,
Fedaa2 Wa.ten. PoLtutLoft ContjtoL Aet(Ctean Wa.tek Ruto at .i Act).
GRANTEE : Union carbide corp.
R&D Departmeht
Bound Brook, New Jersey 08805
TITLE OF PROJECT : Anaerobic Treatment of Synthetic Organic Wastes
PROJECT SlTEEouth Charleston, W.Va4)ATE AWARVEP : December 11, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $220,400 TOTAL E.ST. PROJ. COST : $314,859
PROJECT NUMBER : 1202-DIS PP8S NO . 1202
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJE&:To determine the technical and economic
feasibility of an anaerobic-aerobic process for the treatment
of composit organic chemical waste from a complete petro-
chemical complex. Optimum results will be demonstrated on a
5000 gpd scale treatment facility to obtain design data and
establish operating criteria for larger scale installations.
The demonstration will be conducted subject to a technical an
economic feasibility study based on laboratory scale research
studies. The project will be for a two year period and will
be initiated at the Union carbide Technical Center at South
Charleston, West Virginia.
INQJflRIES : Ci ct .thllndustrjal. Pollution Control Branch
O i e o Reus n k arid Deve2opnent
Feden.aL Wa ten. Poth&tio.i Cc i tt kot Athii L .t’catLoit
US. Vep tbveitt o the Inten. on.
EP J.J. _ -Li.. LW ,
W 5h. ItgtoIi , P. C 0 ?JJ24t
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—-I
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThJA 4hezt dec 1 tLb i b’U ty an R 6 V Gtan.t c.uwi.ded undex See. 6
Fede. aL Wc2ex PoUwt.to i Con btoZ Ae.t.( C .eM Wa..t ’t Re o’tatLo n Act).
GRANTEE : Department of Commerce and Industry
State of Louisiana
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Evaluation of Pol ,meric Materials for the Treatment
and Recovery of Petrochemical Wastes.
PROJECT SITE : Baton Rouge, La. VAlE ACVARVEV : April 16, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $Ii.8,295 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,992
PROJECT NUM’3ER : 12020 - bQC PPBS NO . 1202
VESCR?PTTOM OF PROJECT :
Evaluation, of recently developed reverse osmosis membranes for application
to in-plant chemical waste streams, under laboratory and field conditions.
Various selected membranes and petrochemical in-plant waste streams will be
examined in a high velocity test circuit to obtain engineering and economic
data, to provide guidelines for the application of reverse osmosis to
various selected in-plant waste streams to reduce net organic loads by
recovering their product values.
INQUIRIES : Contact hp Industrial Pollution Control Branch
Oie o Re eLtch a d V ueLopii nt
FedvLa WcWL Po!lwtJz,n Corittol Adin. nJ &t’uz.t.. on
U.S. V ak. me.,vt o th In.teA..Lo4
Wa4hiJlgtcn, P. C. 20242
e6
-------
INFORMATION SIIEET—-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThJA 4he de.w ..Lb 6 b ’z Ly an R S V Owt. o i/Ld .d und k Sea. 6,
Fedeiw.t C tvL Po!Lu-t’o i Cont/Lot Ac t(C a,z Wa.tei . Re. .to’wJJ on Ac.t).
GRA’ITEE : Lalceway Chemicals, Inc.
Muskegon, Michigan
TITLE OF PJZOJECT : “Demonstration Project for Prevention of Pollution
of Water by Chlorides”
PROJECT SITE : Muskegon, Michigan DATE At’)ARV : April 16, 1969
FEVERAL G X”ff : $99,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $212,600
PROJECT !W ER : 12020D3J PPBS itO 1202
VESCRIT’rlOil OF PWJECT :
A full scale (9000 galLons/dag) demonstration of an acid fractionation
process for the treatment of strong numeral waste acids for the recovery
of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids values. The demonstration of the
recovery of acids val’ es is contemplated in lieu of the normal practice
o nau.trilation of acidity and discharge of waste salts to recieving
waters. Waste acids are prevalent in many chemical manufacturing
operations using chiorosulfonic acid as a raw material.
I QUIRIES : Co,i.tac2 the.
Oi.ce. o Rc..sei ch a d Ve.ve2opnei
Fedc&at Wa..tex PoJ1wUo t Con.ttot A .’ut.tZon
U.S. V n o the. InWi2oP
633 IncUana Av2.. ILW.
tjk,Ahinntnu. 1) C. 20242
-------
May L8. lYbY
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Datc’ I r ti’’ I I : ‘I
ihH PrDji 1 is a Grant , under Section 6(b )
Fc drral Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRAflTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Narnc and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Nam ’ arid Address)
TITLi. OF PROJECT:
PROJECT SITE :
The Dow Chemical Company
Texas Division
Freeport, Texas
fr. V. F. Mc llheny
Contract Research Dept.
The Dow Chemical Company
Freeport, Texas 77541
Freeport, Texas
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : To develop a method of treatment of wastes from
polyhydrZc manufacturing processes. Several alternative treatment methods
will be examined to determine their technical, engineering, and economic
feasibility. The results will be used to develop a conceptual design of a
waste treatment facility for the briny wastes resulting from this chemical
industry. Processes to be evaluated are aerobic biological systems, solvent
extraction, foam fractionation, dialysis, and adsorption. Studies will in-
clude laboratory, bench scale, and pilot plant scale testing.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Contro . Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington. D. C. 2O21 2 teg
“Treatment of Waste Waters Resulting from the Production
of Polyhydric Organic Compounds”
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12020 EEQ
DATE OFFERED
May 23, 1969
DATE. ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 5, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costa
W KG nt
ir Contract
Amount
From:
Thi u:
$282,490
$197,740
-------
TN M&1ATI0N S ET
June 19, 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOP €NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tn b’ ica rt1
Th Vc. ject is a Class V Grant , under Section__6(b) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Pigments Department
Wilmington, Delaware 19898
_______________ Dr. Lloyd L. Falk
Senior Consultant
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Engineering Dept.
Wilmington, Delaware 19898
“Ocena Disposal of Industrial Wastes”
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA Gi&r t
r Contract
Amount
From: July 16C
Thru: April ‘7
$ 874,452
)
$ 150,116
DE3CRIPTION OF PROJECT :
To evaluate the various technical and economic aspects of the dispersal of an
acid—iron industrial waste at ea over the continental shelf of the Atlantic
off the coast of Delaware.
INQUIRIES:
CR/6/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Contrql Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
• • — . —
IY 4I J.fl UOU .1)1 d. i.. ic. -r ..
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
TITLi OF PROJECT :
PROJECT SITE : Wilmington, Delaware
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUIv ER : 12020 E&J
—-I-
DATE OFFEBED& June 16, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 24, 1969
-------
I ‘ii’OHW .TI0N SHEET
.Ti,np 1?.. 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMBNT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’3 R’icas .d
Th Pcoject is a Grant , under Section 6 (b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address)
TITt E OF PROJECT :
The Dow Chemical Company
1000 Main Street
Midland, Michigan 1 1 .861,.o
Frank Brower
Director, H.ydrocarbons and Monomers Laboratory
1000 Main Street
Midland, Michigan Lj.861i.0
Demonstration of the Recondition and Reuse of Organically
Contaminated Brines from Chemical Process Industries
PROJECT SITE : Midland, Michigan
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER :
12020 EAS
DATE OFFERED : June 16, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 30, 1969
Grant or
Contract
- Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
rWPCA Grant
)r Contract
Amount
from:
Thru:
$ 1,303,11.08
$ o9,81o
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Develop and demonetrate a chemical-adsorption process for wastewaters from
a phenol manufacturing plant. The process will treat the wastewaters for
the removal and recovery of phenol and acetate and the remaining brine
wastewater will be utilized for caustic-chlorine production. The basic
process involves the selective separation of organic constituents by activated
carbon beds. Beds will be regerterated by chemical means.
IN TJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 20211.2
70
-------
I NI’Ol&IATION SHEET
6118169
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSThATION PROJECT
Date to b Re1carc.d
Thts Project is a Grant , under Section__6(b)
Federal Water P 1lution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
Farmers Chemical Association. Inc.
Box 87
Harrison. Tennessee
Edward C. Bingham
Tech, Asst. to Gen. Mgr.
Farmers Chemical Association. Inc.
Harrison, Tennessee 37341
“Remrwal of Nitrogenous Compounds from a Fertilizer
Plant Effluent Using Modified Operation of Conven-
tional Waste Treatment Systems”
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA G2 nt
r Contr. et
Amount
From: 6/69
Thru: 6/71
4 22O .3OO
$154,210
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : A full scale development and demonstration
of the treatment pf nitrogenous fertilizer effluents using stripping
or oxidation pretreatment techniques. followed by bio—nitrification in
a conventional trickling filter sewage treatment plant as modified for
the purpose of providing optimized removal of nitrogenous materials
in the waste.
INQtJIRIES:
GR 5/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. DeDartment of the Interior
Washington, D. C. ,202’i2
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
I
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Narnc and Addr s )
TITLi OF PROJECT:
PROLTECX SITE : Tyner. Tennessee
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12020 EGI4
DATE OFFERED : June 13. 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :June 27, 1969
-------
INFORMATION SHEET - - -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONI’RACT
This sheet describes briefly an R & D Contract awarded under Sec. 6,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
CONTRACTOR : C. Ii. Rice and Company
15 Noble Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15205
TITLE OF PROJECT : Cost—Effectiveness of Industrial Waste Water Treatment
Practices
PROJECT SITE : above DATE AWARDED : June 28, 1968
FEDERAL CONTRACT : 56,25o TOTAL PROJ COST : $56,2 o
PROJECT NUMBER : :1J .-l2-435 PPBS NO : 1202
BRANCH CHIEF: PROJECT OFFICER:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This contract 1 to obtain estimates of the total expenditures required by
specific chemical industries during the next five years to meet (a) state
water quality standards and (b) a high percentage removal of each specific
‘pollutant including thermal pollution. The industries covered will include
those in the Standard Industrial Categories 2813, 2814, 2815, 2818, and
2871 (Immonia and Urea o ily).
The project is schedulad tq be completed in October, 1968.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
ELD c}/t. c} U.S. Department of the Interior
uO - - ii: - .
Washington, D.C., 2 20242
-------
INFO HMATION SHEET --
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
This sheet describes briefly an R&D Grant awarded under Sec. 6b,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
CO NTRACT0R Engineering-Science, Inc.
150 East Foothills Blvd.
Arcadia, California 91006
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Preliminary Investigation Requirements-Petrochemical
& Refinery Waste Treatment Facilities”
PROJECT SITE : Austin, Texas DATE AWARDED : June 30, ‘1969
FEDERAL CONTRACT: TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $17,000
PROJECT NUMBER : 12020 EID PPBS NO . 12020
ESCBIPTION OF PROJECT : This project is to compile, organize, and effectively
present the many components which constitute a preliminary wastewater-treat-
ability study. It will be formulated with the intent of serving as a valuable
format and source of reference for personnel charged with conducting
laboratory and pilot plant programs relative to wastewater treatabi].ity includ-
ing identification of the gaps in the knowledge, and presentation of the
descriptions in a form useful by the Water Resources Scientific Information
Center. Particular emphasis will be placed on programa where petrochemical
and refinery wastewaters are involved, although many aspects of the report
will have a much broader applicability.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
Office of Research and Deve1o nent
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 20242
WJL/4/69
qq
-------
PPB 1204
PAPER & ALLIED PRODUCTS
12040
WP Letters To GPO PM
524—05 EBY Oregon State U. — Burgess R Scott G. Webster
628—05 DE l I U. of Wash. — McCarthy ft. Scott G. Webster
1166-02 EFC U. of Wash. — Allen ft. Scott G. Webster
1305—01 EXQ U. of Wash. — McCarthy ft. Scott 0. Webster
DLQ Oregon St. U. — Pacha M. Knittel G. Webster
DBD Montana St. U. — Sanks ft. Scott G. Webster
WPRD
12 Pulp Mfgrs. R. Scott 0. Webster
Research Leaque
55 EM! The Head Corp.. ft. Scott G. Webster
69 ELW Crown-Zellerbach Corp. ft. Scott
115 N. C. State Univ.
116 EEK Georgia—Kraft Co.
117 EUG i i
135 DYD International Paper Co. 0. Putnicki
144 Crown Zellerbach Corp. H. Scott
183 ENC Interstate Paper Corp. E. Lomasney
240 )RY Continental Can Co. Inc. G. Putnicki ti
DKD The Institute of Paper G. Webster
Chemistry
EJU St. Regis Paper Co. G. Webster G. Webster
Contract
14—12-] 62 Elqctro—optica]. Systems C. Brunner
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR PULP & PAPER INDUSTRIF
PPB 1204: Paper & Allied Products
Engiand
hOt. Estuary
‘ Chesapea’e-Susquehanna
I
t! ertD R co ] I Virgifl I
I c’’
Lls landsJ
June 19G7
U. S. c or
Fed..jS W.’t.r Co’ ’ .% .— r.
-------
I i”Oi(WtTION S1- ET
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
5R of the
Th Project is a Class I Grant , under Section
Federal Wator Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR : Oregon State University
(Name and .Addressj Corvallis, Oregon 97331
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address)
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Pulp Mill Effluent Disposal’ t
PROJECT SITE : Corvallis and Newport, Oregon
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12040 EBY
DATE OFFERED : /I ’#4y 2 /P 9
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : Jtj 2 1969
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Research will be ,conducted on predicting the effecls of Kraft mill waste disposal
in the ocean on the marine environment. A remote sensing system and aerial
photography will be utilized to estimate waste concentrations, water currents,
diffusion coefficients, and vertical concentration profiles in a i ocean outfall
plume. Aerial photography will be taken with a multispectral camera system of
the waste field. Boat sampling will be conducted at the sante time to provide
“ground truth” data. Data wiLl be compiled and analyzed by a system of
computer analysis which was developed for this purpose in 1968-69.
The investigation will include several Kraft mill outf ails along the Oregon
coast. Results of bioassays and chemical analyses will be related to photo-
graphic imagery. Zones of water quality influence about existing outf ails and
proposed outfails will be estimated, and diffusion coefficients will be
estimated.
IN tJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202 42 .77
Mr. Fred 3. Burgess
Head, Department of Civil Engineering
Oregon State University
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
WPCA G nt
r Contr tct
Amount
Prom:6/l/69
Thru: 5/31/70
$ 20,781
$ 19,237
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCI-I & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk4. 6ku.t deAc.t .be4 bnie. Zy an R V Gkan.t aMwuied nde’i. Sec. £
Fede .aL Wa.te t PoZju.tion Co,WtoL Ac.t( Lean Wa.tvt Re .ton.g.t øn Act).
GRANTEE : University of Washington
Seattle, Washington
Dr. Joseph McCarthy
TiTLE OF PROJECT : ‘ t Studies of Low Molecular Weight Lignin Sulfonates”
Effective Date: Sept. 1, 1968
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington PATE AWARDED : Oct. 18, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $32,707.00 for 5th yr.TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$17o,000.oo
PROJECT NUMBER : WP00628-05 PPBS NO . 12024
1201.1.0 DEH
vESCR PrION OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to isolate and
ehara&terize low molecular weight lignin sulfonates which are formed from
the lignin in wood by the action of the u1fite pulping process. The
information obtained should be of assistance in developing economic uses
for the waste liquors from sulfite pulp rrills.
INQUIRiES : Coattaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O 4ce o Re eaic k, a d Detselopnent
Fe4VLaL Wa.test PoFluti.on Conttot Ac6n nL4tka.t. on
U.S. Vepa neivt o the inte/ao4
GW/1-69
Wa h4n .ton, P. C. 20242
-------
TNI•’OBNATION SHEET
1e2 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ Roleacc’d
This Project is a Class I Gra it , under Section 5 (Research )
Federal Water pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
• of the
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Addressj
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name nd Address)
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98105
Dr. G. G. Allan
Assdciate Professor Fiber Science
College of Forest Resources
TITLE OF PROJEC : “Pollution Abatement by Fiber Modification”
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12040 EFC
DATE OFFEREDs May 28, 1969
DA ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 10, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Coats
“WPCK Grant
r Contract
Amount
From:June 69
Thru:Nay 70
Terminal
$ 1,6o3
$37,850
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The broad aims of this research are:
1. to determine what species, size arid ;hape of molecule
can be attached to lignocellu].osic ftbers using simple
reactions compatible with the established processes for
the manufacture of fibrous products;
2. to investigate the effect of the attachment of such
molecules on the physical properties of fibers and
fiber composites, and
3. to use this information to assess the feasibility of
reducing water pollution due to pulp liquor discharge
by reattaching these waste chemicals to paper and wood
fibers.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and. Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. ‘2O2L 2
79
-------
INFORMATiON SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Th A 4hev dc icir2be4 4.L y an R S V Gkaal.t aLwJcded und&t Se . ç,
F 4C ,LLZL Wa Wt PoLLiz.tLon ContitoL Ac.t(Cteait Wa.C ’t Re.aokaL o,i Ac21.
GRANTEE : TJ iversity of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98105
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Stedm Stripping of Kraf’t Pulp Mill Effluent Streams”
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington PATE AWARDED : Feb. 6, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : 3,665 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $I1.3,665
PROJECT NLJ1ABER ; WP-1305 PPBS NO 12011.
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT ; The broad objective of the presently proposed
research is to improve the effectiveness and to extend knowledge concerning
the possible industrial applications of the “SEKOR” process which, in
essence, comprises the counter-current steam stripping of Kraft pulp mill
condensate streams in order to bring abouL the removal of steam-volatile
organic compounds from the fluid and thereby provide re1a tively clean effluent
water which can be reused in pulp mill process or else discharged without
danger. The volatilized organic substances are condensed to yield water-
immiscible “SEKOR oils” which may find uses in commerce. Use of the process
may also result in a substanti 1 decrease in the odorous substances emitted
into the atmosphere from Kraft pulp mills.
Major Investigator: Dr. Joseph L. McCarthy
INQU IRIES : Con.tat the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OJc.e o Re4ewt h a,id Veve2op?Ient
FedeAa2 Wa2e/L PoLLuti on CosWtoL AthnLii tita.t o,i
U.S. Vepa.tón svt o ( the 7n ei 4o4
GRW 1/69 W4hA.n9to , V. C. 20242
0
-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEAF Chj & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 6hee.t de6e. jbe4 bn2t y an R V G ant aiw..’ided u,ida Sec. 5,
FedeAaL ( tui PoLLu2Lon Contjtot Act(CLwt WatuL ReoLonm.t4o,t Aet).
GRANTEE : Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Sl:iine Growth Evaluation of Treated Pulp Mill Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Lebanon, Oregon PATE ALMRVEV : March 12, 1969
FEVERAL JTh $12,910 (1st yr.) TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $33,000
PROJECT NUMBER : l2014 O DLQ. PPBS NO . l2O 4
VESCRZPTJON OF PROJECT: BUDGET PERIOD : March 1, 1969
to Februarfr 28, 1970
The main objective o this research is to evaluate the slime growtn
promoting potential of treated pulp mill wastes. Wastes treated
by various means will be tested for their ability to support slime
growth using various procedures. Additional studies will be carried
out in an effort to define specifiC carbon and nitrogen sources in
treated wastes which support the growth of Sphaerotilus . The effects
of environmental factors on growth of S haeroti1us also will be
examined. This study will contribute to the development of abatement
procedures for contrclling slime growth as well as assist in establish-
ing suitable water quality criteria for streams rec iving pulp mill
wastes. The study aiso will add to the knowledge o aeroti1us.
INQUIRIES : Cofttgr .t Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DAST
0W2e o Re a * mad Veudopneitt
FedeML Wa.te4 Poth on Co*$jtot Aá,,.ijtLWig.t4opt
U.S. Pepc4biesit o the lfltek4ok
ii , IJL _ .L .
Wa hLiigton, V. C. 2024?
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
lisi.4 he.e2 dteeft2bt& bki t ty an R P G 4JIt W 3JEded widvi See.
Fede*aZ Wa.tek PotLu1J, n ConttoZ A t(CLeait EUa.te.k Reoto,ca.tLon Act).
GRANTEE : Montana State University
Bozeman, Montana 59715
TITLE OF PROJECT : ‘ t calor and Mineral Removal from Kraft Bleach Wastes’ t
PROJECT SiTE :Boze3nan, Montana PATE AWARVEV : April 1, 1969
FERERAL GRANT : $27,3 4 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $32,791 (first)
PROJECT NUMBER : 12040 DBD NO . 1204
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT: UDGET PERIOD : April 1, 1969
to March 31, 1970
The broad objective f this research is to determine the economic
potential of synthetic resins for the control of pollution from Icraft
bleach wastes particularly in reuse and recycle systems.
More specifically, the objectives are (1) to explore the use of
synthetic resins for the removal of color and other refractory organic
contaminants, (2) to optimize the operation of fixed resin beds for the
removal of organic contaminants and also for simultaneous demineraliza-
tion of waste streams intended for reuse and recycle, (3) to 8eek
economical regenerating methods and chemicals and innocuous means of waste
regenerant disposal, (4) to compare the relative effectiveness and economy
of resins with carbon and (5) to estimate the cost of waste water renovation,
reuse, and recycle using resins either alone or in conjunction with other
aids.
INQUIRIES : Cc.t act the r qi.- 9 o -L. r,oir) C ’ 04 _ D’4 5i7
o Re4ea*cit amd Vewelopneitt
Fede.nAL Wate.’t PoLZut on Contiwl AgnOioticat on
U.S. Pepwv. eiit o the I*te*4oa
1 - —
Wa4hAng.ton, V. C. 20?4t
72.
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkJ 6ku. t de etiJ,e4 bJci.t ty an R S V Gtan.t a vtded cuidvt SeLL. 6,
FedM4L Wa.te PoLZutLon Cont’toZ Ae2(Ctean Wtvte* Re toM2 on Ae2).
GRANTEE:- - - Pu1p Manufacturers Research League, Appleton, Wiaconein
TITLE OF PROJECT : Development of Reverse Osmosis for In-Plant Treatment of
Dilute Pulping Industry Wastes.
PROJECT SITE : 6 mills to be used DATE AWARVEV:
FEVERAL GRANT : $483,371 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $690,530
PROJECT NW4BER : WPRD 12-01-68 pp 5 NO . 1204
1201.1.0 EEL
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The project will determine the ability of reverse osmosis technology
to both produce a product water suitable for re-use in mill processes,
and a concentrate available for, by-product recovery or for treatment
prior to discharge. Wastes to be handled, at separate mills, will include
weak sulfite washings, weak Kraft washings, bleach wastes, condensates
and semi-chemical wastes, The semi-trailer housed reverse osmosis
equipment will be transported to separate mills for the experimental
work. Presently projected mill sites are located In Wisconsin and
Minnesota. Others are to be selected.
Co tt c..t the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i.c.e o Reieaxch awl VeveZopnen.t
8/68 FedVULL )a..tei PoLtwt2on Co,tt)toL Athn n pt
U.S. P tpa.k4neit.t o the In.te.kho4
Jil l i L.. IUJ .
Wa.ohcngton, P. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEAR Ij & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkiA &kuJ dedc.a.J..bea b 2i. Zq an R S V G’twtt av.w ded undeit See. 6,
Fede.M.L Wa.tex PoLLu4on Contjtot Act(Ctwz Wo2 t Re6to’vitjon Aeti.
GRANTEE : The Head Corporation
Chilhicothe, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Evaluation of Role of High Rate Trickling filters and
Aeration Devices Separately nd in Combination for the
Advanced Biological Treatment of Integrated Kraft Pulp
PROJECT SITE : and Paper Mill DATE AWARVEV ’ Effluents”
Chillicothe, Ohio December, 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : $299,950 or 70% of TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $42 500
project
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 55-01-67 PPES NO . 1204
12040 14Y
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The pulp and paper industry needs to find an alter-
native treatment process which is less expensive and difficult—to-operate than
the conventional activated sludge process. As a step in this direction, this
project will involve the continuous operation of a pilot treatment plant con-
taining plastic trickling filter, brush-aerated oxidation ditch, conventional
aerated lagoon, deep aerated lagoons, and two clarifiers in combinations and
evaluate possible efficiencies.
The specific research objectives are to: determine the effect of influent
quality on biological treatment; evaluate potential of plastic trickling
filters alone arid in combination with brush-aerated oxidation ditch, conven-
tional aerated lagoon and deep aerated lagoon; and to achieve higher—than-
conventional BOD removals from kraft mill wastes.
INqUIRIES : Co*tae2 the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
o Re4ea*ch aiid Veue2opnent
Fede’t L Wa Wi. PoZZwtion Con.t’wZ Aá at t gt on
8/6 U.S. VeF* tt en.t O the Inte*4o.t
i - f l J.J. __ .1.... LU .
Wa&h.ingtoit, V. C. 2024?
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL6 4hee.t de etLbe6 b’tJ4 4’ a,t R g V Gwtt auwtded wide.x Seg. 6,
Fede.noL Wa.tvt. POLtLLtIOfl Co,ttjtot Aet(CLwt Wa.tV& Re onatijnt Act).
GRANTEE : Crown Zellerbach Corp., Camas, Washington.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Economic Optimization of Secondary Treatment and Determination
of Load to Control Biological Growths in a Stream.
PROJECT SiTE : Lebanon, Oregon DATE AWARPEV : 12-5-67 (0&A)
FEDERAL GRANT : $503,739 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $802,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 69-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 ELW
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT :
This project will seek to determine the costs of mechanically aerated
lagoon treatment of pulp mill and paper mill wastes by examining in
detail the comparison of retention time, aerated lagoon depth, basin
configuration, recycle and parallel versus series operation of two lagoons.
Information will also be obtained concerning ‘treatment achieved by
multiple lower hp surface aerators compared to two high hp units.
Further, the project, will, by use of test streams, eek to determine
the degree of treatment needed to prevent slime growth in the receiving
stream,
INQ (IRlES : Con.tae.t Ae Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i2e o Re6eMck aatd VeveZopneit*
8/68 Fcde. aL Watejt. Pot1u.t on Cont oL Arn tka.t4cn
(1.5. Vepwv. rn .nt 06 the ln.te.t o4
U I. ILW .
cvaahi.ngton, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki 4he. t daejc4.be. b r2t Zy an R S V Gtgutt auw ded unde.t SeLt. 6,
Fede*aL Wa tet PoZtu42on ConttoZ Act (CLwt (&tVL Re4toM.tLon Act).
GRANTEE : N. Carolina State University, Raleigh, N. C.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Filtration of Kraft Pulp Liq ior through Chips
PROJECT SITE : Raleigh, N. C. PATE AWARVEV : 8-4-67 (06 )
FEDERAL GRANT : $18,144 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $25,920
PRCJECT NUMBER : WPRD 115-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
1 ESCR1PT1ON OF PROJECT :
The project is directed toward a determination of the decrease in pollutional
load that may be gained by filtration of weak Kraft washings through wood
chips just prior to their entry intq the pulping process.
INQUIRiES : Contact the th stri LPollution C troL Br h, DEl)
U 1 64.Ct 4 JCeotMcft ama veLopne
8/68 Fede’wZ Wtte4 PoS1ut on Con.tiwL Athn ni.a*jtat4oft
U.S. Vepw tment o the III VI.2O4
‘ i i _ J _ . .i. .. u.w .
W 6h. ngton, V. C. 2 24t
8
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk4 kec.tde&cnAbe& b 6,
Fede. a.t Wa.te’t PoZZat on Con.ttot Act(CLwt Wa.tut Re.UonaJJon Act).
GRANTEE : Georgia-Kraft Co., Rome, Ga.
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Selected Internal Kraft Mill Wastes in
Cooling Tower
PROJECT SITE : Macon, Georgia VATE AWARVEV : 8-7-67 (O&A )
FEVERAL GRANT : $287,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $411,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 116-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 EEK
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project will determine the ability of cooling towers to both permit
heat dissipation and recycle of waste water back to the condensers as
well as the treatment efficiez icy that may be provided by passage of
waste waters through the tower. Condensates and decker filtrate will
be handled by this facility. Organic load reduction will probably be
gained by a combinaçion of chemical oxidation, air stripping of volatile
constituents and biochemical oxidation.
TNQJIIRIES : Contact e. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DEl)
O J.ce o Re wch. mmd VeveLopnen.t
U FedeMZ LUmtek. Pothit on Conttot Aán tL tta$J.on
U.s. VepQ.tbvent o the 1nte 4o&
ill 1..JL. _ .t . !LIL
fl 4kLng.ton, V. C. 2024t
:7
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMEN1’ GRANT
Tk. 4hee.t de.6c be6 b’P2 4ty an R £ V G’Ldn.t auwuied undex See. 6,
Fedv’aL Ukz.tex PoUu t4on ContjLot Aet(Ct an Wa.teit Re ton.iWon Act).
GRANTEE : Georgia-Kraft Co., 1 ome, Ga.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Kraft Mill Effluent by Foam Separation
PROJECT SiTE : Rome, Ga. VAlE AWARVEV : 8-4-67 (0&A)
FEPERAL GRANT : $48,181 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,830
PP OJECT NU’ !5ER : WPRD 117-01-68 PP8S ?1O . 1204
___— 12040 EUG
VESCRIPTTOIJ OF PROJECT :
The project is directeu towara an examination of the possible separation,
in the foam phase, of a significant portion of the dissolved organics
contained in primary treated Krpft Mill waste. Hopefully it may be
discovered that a high percent of the pollutional load may be separateci
in a relatively small volume by these means. This may then provide a
larger volume of ‘toms’ suitable for discharge and a smaller volume
of ‘tops’, or col1aps d foam, directed to complete treatment.
lN tIiRIES: Contact the. Indusj rjal Pollution Control Branch, DED
o Re ewLch oirid V ve2opnent
8/6 FC4eMZ WatuL PoLtu.tLon Conttot AththtL&t’ ation
U.S. Vcpa4tne.nt o .the ipltt. o;L
U! LL J . !LIL
W 4hington, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TI,A.4 .ahee2 de cn.the b’i2t ty at R V Gwtt auwtded unden. Sec . 6LI )
Feda xL Wata PoUu.tLon Co ttJtoL Ac.t(Cteait .Wa.te.k ReotoMtLo* MC).
GRANTEE : International Paper Company
220 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Evaluation and Demonstration of the Massive Lime
Process for the Removal of Color from Kraft Pulp Mill. Wastes.”
PROJECT SiTE : Springhill, Louisana VATE AWARVEV : JUN 1 4 1968
FEVERAL GRANT:$595,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $85Q,000
PROJECT NLLM8ER:WPRD-l i5-01-(R—1)—68PP8S NO . 1204
12040 DYD
VESCRZPTION OF PROJECT :
International Paper Company proposes to isolate wastes from the
caustic extraction stage of a Kraft pulp bleaching line and the
unbleached decker of the pulp mill, and to treat these wastes
separately and combined for the removal of color and reduction
of biochemical oxygen demand by the Massive Lime Process over a
period of 27 months.
INQJIZRZES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWce o ReoeaMh ..amd Vevelopneiit
FedeMZ Wa.twt PoLlution ContscoL AthniiiLU*atLoii
U.S. VepoA.bient o the intetiot
UP Li J’LL
G /5-68 OkUhLJ,0tolI,P. C. 2024!
-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCI-I & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TJL L 4hee dc6ciWc. 4 bi J ij an R V G’uut.t wtwLded unduL. Scc . 6kb)
Fedeita.L W 7 .tvL PoL&.t2on Cou.tJwL Ac2(Ctetzn Wa..te/L Re on .a.tLoit Ac ).
GRANTEE: Cr own Ze lierbach Corporation
1 Bush Street
San Francisco, California 94119
TiTLE OF PROJECT:”A Demonstration Plant Evaluation of Four Methods
for Pulp and Paper Mill. Sludge Utilization and Disposal”
PROJECT SITE : Camas, Washington PATE AC’/ARVEV : April 3, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $848,320
PROJECT HW.!I3ER:WPRD 144-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
VESCR 1PTIO?! OF PROJUCT :
This demonstration study is a full-scale investigation of four methods
of utilization and disposal of primary sludge from a combined pulp
and paper mill. The areas of investigation are: disposal by incin-
eration, utilization as “hog-fuel” make-up in a conventional steam
boiler at rates ranging between 5 and 50%, use as a dried mulching
material for highway slçpe preparation and the evaluation of sludge
as an agricultural soil conditioner.
j f4UIRIES : Coittae.t Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J..ce o Re4ea/L.ch at’4 V ve2op ieiv
8/68 Fedvc.aL Wa .te.k PolLwtAoa Con tn o Ad n nL n .a.tLon
U.S. V pa neit o . th Inte.’ ..Lo/z.
U I ! _ [ L _ .. _ . U... ILU .
Wc. hJngton, P. C. 20242
•90
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk.L 4h e. d cjubc bL Ly an R 3 V Giz.wvt a dcd uridex Sec . 6(b)
Fcde. .a L W tVL PoLbi tcion Con.C’wL Ac. t(Ceeizn Wa.tc/L Re. oMtün1 Ac. ).
GRAUTEE : Interstate Paper Corporation
300 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
TITLE OF PROJECTS “Chemical Coagulation Color Removal System for
Kraft Mill Effluents”
P1 O3ECT SITE : Riceboro, Georgia V/ITE Aft’ &T VED : June 27, 196
FEVIL’ !.L G Aiff :$466,895 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $741,160
PROJECT WLIflI3ER : WPRD-183-Ol-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 ENC
ESCR 1PTTON OF PROJEàT : This project proposes to develop, install, and
demonstrate a new chemical coagulation process for removing color
from kraft pulp and paper mill effluents. The process uses a
stoichiometric lime addition to the untreated wastes, prior to primary
scdimc’ntation, which adsorbs th color bodies onto the lime floc and
is settled with the sludge. This sludge is then removed to lagoons
for drying and storage.
IWQpIRIES : Con.tac. .the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
Oi o Re4 a1LCk 4 V ue2op :zn.
Fedv W2.t & Poflu.ti.on Co,vt.’toL Athnin.L a ,t
U.S. Ve ti cn.t o th In.te’ .w’t
_ . U.N .
GRW:5/68 Wa6lthtgtOlt, P. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkA 4heeA de ..t.Lbe.o b’ i. 6ty an R S V G’ta,vt aLavtded u ndek Sea. oLb)
FedMaL Wa .tvr. PoUu..tJ..on Contjtot Aa.t(CZwi Wa.t9JL Re .to’ta. on Act).
GRANTEE : Continental Can Company, Inc.
Paperboard and Kraft Paper Division
Hodge, Louisiana 71247
TITLE OF PROJECT : “A Color Removal and Fibrous Sludge Disposal
Process for the Kraft Paper Industry”
PROJECT SITE : Hodge, Louisiana PATE AWARVEV : JUL 2 5 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $750,000.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2,865,970
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-24o-ol-68 PPBS NO . 12Q4
12040 DRY
VESCRZPTTON OF PROJECT : The two year project will develop economical
lesign and operational data applicable to the Kraft pulp and paper
industry in removal of color in mill effluents, and disposing of
fibrous sludges. Color removal 411 be accomplished by line precipi-
tation of the color bodies and fibers, with subsequent regeneration
of the lime by sludge combustion in a kiln.
lNf/JURIES : Coitt et die Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J2e o Re eu k aa4 Veuelopneii.t
Fede.no2 Wa Cen. oF.2ut. on Cont’v.o AdnLiiot tat oai
U.S. VepwPfivteitt o the InW Ao t
ill I.JL _ t IIJI .
Waoh.ington, P. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki .okee.t daenibu bn2t ty an R S V G an.t auwcded undui Sec. 6Lb)
FedetaL Wa.teiL PoF.ZutAon CorttlLoZ Act(CZwt Wa.CQA Re4toM.t Dfl Act).
GRANTEE : Institute of Paper Chemistry
Appleton, Wisconsin 511.911
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Chemical and Physical Nature of Color Bodies in
Kraft Mill Effluents Before and After Treatment??
PROJECT SITE:Appletori , Wiscorsin PATE AWARVEV : DEC 2 11968
FEDERAL GRAMT:$119,50)-i ..70 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $170,721
PROJECT NUMBER : 120 1 1-ODKD PPBS NO . 12011.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Kraft pulping wastes which are discharged into streams may darken
the color of the water, contribute to the biochemical oxygen demand
and increase the solids content of the stream. New federal and state
wa:er standards will require remova.l of such materials from mill
eflluents. Lime precipitation in small scale operations has been
shown to remove certain of the solid constituents and demonstration
grants on lime treatments have been approved at three kraft mill sites.
The objective of the proposed project is to determine the chemical
and physical nature of the color bodies in the effluents from these
three kraft mills both before and after lime treatment. The investi-
gation should lead to a better understanding of the results or the
lime treatments, and may suggest means for more complete removal of
color.
INQUIRIES : Co*tgc-t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch - DED
O Lce o Re.oea.a.ch amd VeueZop ien.t
FedejtaZ Wa.te.it. PoZZu.tion Cont’v.oZ Ath,t aLo a.t on
U.S. Vea. fren.t 06 Lhe In et o’L
iU IJ-L _ .L _ fLW
Wa6hington, V. C. 2024?
-------
Ti’ ) Nc ’rIoN SI ET
Jun 1QF Q
RESEARCH, DE LOP}’ NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Datc’ t,r, b’ ’ 1 C (‘EL:. (I
Th PrDjeci. is a Class V Grant , under Section Six of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(IsIame and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
T ime and Address )
St. Regis Paper Company
150 ast 1 4.2nd Street
New Yo rk, New York 10017
Hr. Roy L. Miller
Post Office Box 1591
Pensacola, Florida 32502
TITLi. OF PROJECT : T ’The Production and Use of Activated Carbon for Water
Renovation in ICraft Pulp and Paper Mills”
PROJECT SITE : Jacksonville and Pensacola, Florida; and West Nyack, New York
DATE OFFERED ;
DEGc:RIPTI0N OF PROJECT :
St. Regis Paper Company proposes a program for the development of an economical
system for maximum water reuse in the kraft pulp and paper industry as a means
of water pollution control and conservation. This program is based on two
concepts. The first is an effluent treat nent cycle using activated carbon and
the second is on-site carbon production and activation from readily available
raw materials with full integration into the kraft mill recovery and power
systems to achieve the lowest net cost of activated carbon.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. I epartnient of the Interior
Washington, D. C.? 20211.2
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12011.0 EJIJ
JUN 13 19 9
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : JUN 2 5 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
?WPCA G1 nt
r Contr et
Amount
From: 6-30-69
Thru: 6-30-72
$l,11.61,562
878, 1,.72
-------
INFORMATION SI [ EET- -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
Tki &hc e dcc.t bQA bn.it ty an R V G’ca,i.t atwjt.dg4 undvt See. 6, Contract
Fe.deAcLL WcLtZ/L PoLLwtLon ContjtoL Ac.t(CUan Wa.tui Re.oto’cgtLoii Act).
GRANTCE : Electro_Q’Pt C8 3 Systems, Inc.
300 North Haistead St.
Pasadena., California 91107
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Plasma Arc Processing of Spent Sulfite Liquors”
PIWJCCT SiTE : Pasadena, California PATE AWARVEV : May 16, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $L1.9,9l .5.0O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $11.9,911.5.OO
PROJECT WLJM8ER : 1 4-l2-162 PPSS NO . l20
VESCRZPTION OF PROJECT : To determine the technical and economic feasibility
of plasma arc treai ment of sulfite waste liquors.
T :QUI lES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OJ..ce o Rc4wc.ch and PeveLopnent
Fede&aL Wa.WL PoUwt. ôn CosljtoL Athii nL t’taz.tion
U.S. Vtpa’L..tncitt o At
GRW 1/69 .. -.
Wa.4hA.ngtoit, 20242
-------
PPB 1205
PETRdLEUI4 & COAL PRODUCTS
August 1969
12050
wp Letters To GPO PM
DIP Texas A8 Res. Fdn. - L. Lively G. Rey
A. Martell
DKF U. of Oklahoma-Reid L. Myers E. Dulaney
11452 DRC Illinois Institute of E. Dulaney
Tecbno1o r-Kintne r
WPD
1714 Villanova Univ. E. Dulaney
E. Clark
215 EKT American Oil Co. 0. Olsen G. Rey
2 e3 DSH Am. Petroleum Inst. P. Lefcourt E. Dulaney
D American Oil Co. A. Printz G. Rey
Contract
i14 -i -46i DMT Engineering Science, W. Horn G. Rey
Inc. - Gloyna
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR PETROLEUM REFINERIES
PPB 1205: Petroleum & Co 1 Products
Hudson Charn
Estuary
ake-Susq.Jeh3nna
Pue-to Rc 2 j
OG
JL• e ¶‘57
U. S. Dj —.,..t
idrr.l WJ ef ..on C’ A--
-------
LOCATION OF INTERMEDIATE CC4L TAR PRODUCTS PLANTS
PPB 1205: Petroleum & Co&. Products
Hudson Champla
nd
Estuary
F
c17 ‘ c .J
Lue o Rico 1 Virgin I
_____ I c’’
Li s!a nd sJ
Juno 1 )G7
U. S. Dtpa.f.”.nf f f , tnft,. ’t
r e,aI Wift, Pou .un Co ! o Ad n i rs: n
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DLVI LOPMENT CR,\NT
Tki. .sJfe€.t daex&be4 bn.Lt Zy an R g V Giuutt aL4kVLd 4 u dVL SLL . S;
Fe4uta2 WLt.tVL PoZLutLon Conttol Ac (Ctwt Wa eIc RU.toMJJ on Aet).
GRAWTEE:T A AM4 Research lbundsticn
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Metal Ion-Cata1 ’aed Oxidation of Phenols aM
Aromstic A 1nes”
October 14,
PROJECT SITE : Texas MJ4 DATE AWARDED : 1968
FE URAL GRAJ’ff : $4Q,265 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $234,000
PROJECT_NUM5ER:wp O .179-O3 PP S NO .
— 1&05C) DIT
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : A Study of tl . nochanisis aM feasibility of
j c t 3 d oxidation of pherala and axc. tic samoa by mo)e-
cu ” oXygen in vsetevater systems sztial1y tx’ested vith pota.siia
pervnanganste.
INQUiRiES , CoistaL C the Ind atria1 P t ticm Contz’o3. Branch
OULee o Rrna.tch o.iid DeveZopvtent
FtdeML Wetek PoThIti.0N Contjtot Ad thiL6C. atLo,I
U.S. Vepa tti ,ieat o the IsiteA4o4
i __ i ’LL. tLL
Wa&hAitgto*, V. C. 2024t
100
-------
TN 0jU 1ATION SHEET
BESEABCH, DEVELOP1 NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date t b’ 1k icaccd
Th .s Project is a Class I Grant , under Section 5 of the
Federal Water Pollution trol Act (Clean Water. Restoration A6t) .
I
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
University of Oklahoma Research Institute
1808 Newtçn Drive
Norman, Oklahoma 73069
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Prof. George Reid
(Name and Address)
TITLE OF PROJECT :
State-of-the-Art Evaluation on Petroleum and Coal Wastes
PROJECT SITE :
Norman, Oklahoma
PROGRAM (PROJECT) MJ ER : 12050 DKF
DATE OFFEBED
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : Jan. 8, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
r Contract
knount
From: 10/15/6
Thru: 1o/11I./69
$17,897
$1L l.,297
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of this project is to develop a state of’ art report on the
characteristics of oil and coal wastes. Th6 study will include the procedures
used by industry for aggrigating and handling these wastes and will deter-
mine the applicability and efficiencies of various treatment processes.
Literature surveys, personal intervi ws and field studies will be used to
define future research needs.
INQUIRIES:
ELD 1/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202112
/0/
-------
INFORMATION SH EET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TILL S £heei de4e. Lbe bici Ly an R g V C ta,i a uid d u idv Sc.c . 6;
Fe4ewi te’L Po .UwUoa COWLOZ Ac-t(C ean Wct-te.’z. P wtoJw.J 2on Aa ).
GPJ NTEE : Illinois Institute of Technology
TITLE OF P’i’ OJECT : Efficiency of Fibrous Bed Coalescers
BUDGET PERIOD: Dec. 1, 1968-Nov. 30, 1969
PROJEcT_S’TE: Chicago, 11inoin VATE A&ARVEV : Jan. 13, 1969
FEVE .AL G A ’iT : $32,596 for the TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $65,000
1st year - —
PROJECT flUM ER : WP-01 1 1.52-0l PP8S NO . 1205
1205O DRC
VESCR1V(IOI’! OF PZOJECT :
The objective of this research project is to develop a mathematical
description of the removal of fine-divided, in solub1e, liquid
pollutants from an aquebus waste streazn by means of a mixed fibrous
bed, and to develop a procedure for designing such beds. The procedure
will then be applied to the abatement of polluti.on from an actual
industrial source in the Chicago area.
PQUIRIES : Con.tac2 .the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Jjii o Rc4ea/i cth a2.d V ve1opneivt
FedeAtL Wa-tc PoUuUon Con JLoe Adr ,vL .tjw2 on
U.S.V 1 : .n,t o .tha lnWt o
WO4h i.n9 tO7L, V. C. 20242
ELD 1/69 /oz
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCh & DEyELOPMENT GRANT
ThU 4hw d Jc .The6 biti Ly an R £ V Owz .t a )3JLd .d und? Sec.. C
F dei ct.t O ?c,tc/L PoLLLA t’.o;L CoI’21LOZ Ac,t(C eajz (t’a te,’ . Re .Mo a.t on ACt).
G A?ITEE: Villanova University
Dr. Edgar W. Clarke
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Elimination of Water Pollution by Used Oil
Re-refining Plants”
O.TECT Sfl Villanova, Pa. VAlE_A(’)ARVEV: Completed
FEVE ML GRANT : $33,796.00 TOThL EST. PROJ. COST : -
PRO.IECT ?!W [ ER : WPD 17LI. 0l_67 PPBS NO . 1205
VESCR1VfTO I OFPWJEC1 : The ob.jective of this grant project was to
demonstrate, on commercial size equipment, an economical process for
re-refining of waste oils with recovery of waste products so as to
eliminate water pollution. The work was done at the Douglasville, Pa.
p1ant of Berks Associates, Inc. A final report describing the project
and the process is available.
INQ UIRIES : Contac.t t1 industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW..ce o R 4wuth a d V ve1opneivt
FedcJLa2 Wa.tciL PoLewt.Lon Con t’wL AdrthiW n.a .t .Lon
U.S. V pc :vt.t o In tc.tioP
ELD 1/69 Wa4hjn on, V. C. 20242
/03
-------
INFORMATION SI-fEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL6 4h c_t de2c.tLbe.. 4 s bic ftj cu 6 V GM.n attwtd d und jt Sec. 6,
Feder tt Wa.tcn. PoIlwUon Cor..t.&ot Ac t(Ceeoit W te. L Rc o’ a th, i Act).
American Oil Company
GRANTEE : 910 S. Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60680
TITLE OF PROJECT:Fluid-Bed Incineration of Petroleum Refinery Waste
PROJECT SITE : Mandan, North Dakota VATE A( iAgVEV : May, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT:$17o,265 TOTAl. EST. PROJ. COST : $354,530
PROJECT NWJ8 EP : WPRD-215-0l-68 PP S HO . 1205
12050 EKT
VESCR 1PTIO’! F P2OJECT :
The project consists of: (1) the design and construction of a fluid-
bed incineration system for treatment of refinery chemical and oil
sludge wastes, and (2) the operation and evaluation of the system as
a means of treating the refinery wastes.
capacities up to 70 barrels per day, at full scale, are to be pro-
cessed. The identity of operating problems and the limitations of the
system are to be determined. The cost of treatment of the refinery
waste by the proposed method will be developed for the system as
optimized during the demonstration period.
INQ.CIIRZES : Contae tIte Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Jce. o Rc eaxak c.’4 Vevctopneii.t
Fede.’LaL Wa.te’t PoL&ttLo t Co ttn oL Adn nLtta.t on
U.S. Vcpc.n.t tent o ke In.W Lo.t
JH I.J .... 1.,, .. ILIJ .
Wa sltht ton, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk L& &hee2 de4cn beo bn2t Zy an R V Gwtt au.wtdtd undui Sec . 6,
Fedc..taL Wa ,Cut PoUwt on Conticot Ac.t(C1 an Wa.t it Re4toka2. Dn Ac2).
GRANTEE : American Petroleum Institute
Air and Water Conservation
1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Improved Capabilities of Biological Systems to
Assimilate Oil”
PROJECT SiTE : New York, New York PATE AWARVEV : June 20, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $51,470 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $84,990
PROJECT NUMBER : w i z43-ol-68 PP8S NO . 1205
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
The project will consist of a study of laboratory scale activated
sludge waste treatment systems which will be operated to determine their
tolerance to various types and amounts of hydrocarbons, the nature of the
interference of the hydrocarbons, the fate of the hydrocarbons in the system,
and to study methods for improving pretrE at1nent of the influent and of
improving the operation of the systems.
The work will be performed by Hydro icience, Inc. under the
direction of an API Task Force. The project period will be 1 year.
ZNQJIIRZES : Cont ar th Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Jaze o Ruean.ch and VeveLop te.n2
FedeMZ Wa2Ut PoL&Lt on ConttoL AánbtL t&ation
U.S. Vepa.n.Onen.t o the !nte o’L
in iJ L _ L fl U .
ELD/5-68 Wa6h. ngton, V. C. 20242
/05
-------
INFORMATION SUEET’-’_
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk 4h e..t d :t Ae. bti..t Ly an R £ V Gn.ojvt avxj.’ ded und Sea. 6,
F deAaL t 2vL !cUn.Uon Cont oL Ac.t(CZ an t a.tI’L Re o’ta.tLon Ac .
GRANTEE : An er::a Oil Company
910 E ..t1 Michigan Avenue
ChLcag . Illinois
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Treatment of Refinery Effluent by a Unique Combination
of Biological and Chemical Processes.
fRIJECT SITE : 1i .iting, tndiana PATE AC ?A VEP : February 20, 1969
FEVER/J. GRA tT:$33 6 , 5 35 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1,737,775
PROJECT NU?) E : 1205 0 - EJ’1L P?ØS NO . l2O
PE.SCRZPT1ON OF P’? OJECT :
A 30 MCD scale project to demonstrate the advantages of using chemical
coagulation and six flotation following biological conditioning to provide
refinery effluent of high quality. To establish what operating flezibilities
exist in such c abination processing and the costs associated therewith.
To evaluate a n er of unique design features, including a hitherto unproven
process for disposal of oily sludges, a unique and low—cost method for
preventing sludge deposition in an aerated lagoon, a novel application of
rotary—drum s j rs and a comparative study of alternate design features
for air flotation.
1NQ UTRIES : Cost ct he Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ij e o R sw h a d Vev1op eri.
Fedv&aL PoUu.t o t Co,Wtoa Ad J.efita.t4on
U.S. VepM.O ter t o £ht In etw’t
633 Indi no. Ave. LW?
I’ ohiigton. P. C. t024f
/0 ( 0
-------
INFORMATION SHEET - - -
RESEARCH & DEVEL.OPMENT CONTRACT
This sheet describes briefly an R & D Contract awarded under Sec. 6,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
CONTRACTOR : Engineering Science, Inc.
150 East Foothill Blvd.
Arcadia, California 19006
TITLE OF PROJECT : The Characteristics and Pollutional Problems Associated
with Petrochemical Wastes
PROJECT SITE:Austin , Texas DATE AWARDED : Sept. 25, 1968
FEDERAL CONTRACT : $11,190.00 TOTAL PROJ. COST : $11,190.00
PROJECT NUMBER : 14-12-461 PPBS NO : 1205
BRANcH CHIE William J. Lacy PROJECT OFFICER : ( orge Rey
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The general scope of the project as developed under
the Plan of Operation shall include a detailed development of the following:
1. History and Projection of petrochemical indu try;
2. Definition, magnitude, and pollutants associated with
these waste treatment problems;
3. Evaluation of control, treatment and dispoaal practices;
4. Listing of the special legal problems involved with
petrochemical Waste management;
5. Economic feasibility of present and future control methods,
reflecting down stream uses; and
6. Evaluation of research needs.
The objectives of this proposed project will be achieved through a well
coordinated plan of operation. A complete literature review shall be con-
ducted using the numerous volumes available in the Engineering, Chemistry,
Biology, and personal libraries located on the University of Texas campus.
Additional information shall be obtained from various governmental agencies
and selected industries. Additional data derived from the unpublished
Environmental Health Engineering Reports shall be utilized.
INQUIRIES : Contact the. Industrial Pollution Cpntrol Branch
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
IL . Il..u .
WashingtQn, D.C. 20242
107
-------
PFB 1206
FOOD & KINDRED PRODUCTS
12060
WL. Letters To GPO F M
1486 U. of Wash. — Carison J. Boydston G. Reeler
ECF Oregon State U. K. Dosta]. G. Reeler
EDK National Canners Asso. W. Pierce G. Keeler
EGU Ohio State U. Res. Fdn. E. Harris G. Reeler
1 )51 Beet Sugar Developuent Fdn. K. Dosta].. G. Reeler
liEQ
93 Beet Sugar Developnent Fdn. J. Boydston G. Reeler
2fl ENS Melbourne Water Sd. Inst.9 K. Dosta]. G. Reeler
226 Ag. Experiment Station E. Lomasney G. Reeler
U. of Pi..erto Rico
WPRD
3 EkE Research Corp. A. RichardsonG. Reeler
15 R.T. French Co. J. Boydston G. Reeler
18 FMC Corp. 3. Merrel G. Reeler
38 Minute Maid Co. D. Hifl G. Reeler
43 Beet Sugar Dev. Fdn. R. Scott G. Reeler
49 EHT North Star R&D Inst. W. Cooke G. Reeler
54 John Morrefl & Co. 0. Olson G. Reeler
56 Vahising, Inc. H. Pahren G. Reeler
58 Snoldst Growers J. Boydston G. Reeler
134 EHU National Canners W. Pierce G. Reeler
Asso.
151 National Canners Asso. W. Pierce G. Reeler
161 Winter Garden Citrus D. HiU G. Reeler
Products Co—op
/0 ?
-------
FPB 1206 Cont’d
FOOD & ICENDRED PRODUCTS
12060
Letters To GPO PM
185 DQV Swift & Company 0. Libby G. Keeler
219 DEQ Dairy R&D Corp. G. Rey G. Keeler
221 DPE Coz’n Products Co. 0. Libby G. Keeler
230 D SB U. of Oklahoma Res. G. Putnicid. G. Keeler
Inst.
241 DFF Farmbest m c. 0. Olsen G. Keeler
251 EAE National Canners Assn. W. Pierce G. Keeler
EGV Gold Kist Poultry H. Snyder G. Keeler
EIG Western Potato Service K. Dostal G. Keeler
DXF Crowleyts Milk Co. A. Richard- G. Keeler
son
I/O
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR FOOD PROCESST I PLANTS
PPB 1206: Food & Kindred Products
, I
1 Puerto Ric Virgin I
I c,I
[ andsj
Hudson Cha
Estuary
Jun. 1967
U S D,p rim,nt o I t,’,or
Po li.!.o
-------
INFORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TI,44 he.et de c’c2bei b’t2g Zy an R S V G aait auwtded w,de4 Sec. 5
FedMaL ( tvt PoUu.t4opt Co ttwZ Aet(CLwt Wa.te.’t Re4to*at2o* Ac.tj.
GRANTEE : University of Washington
Professor Dale A. Carison
TITLE OF PROJECT : Status and Research Needs for Potato Waste Waters
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington DATE AWARDED : June 1, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $18,364 TOTAL EST. PROJ. C05T$19,331
PROJECT NLINBER : WP-01486-01 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to prepare
an exhaustive state-of-the—art report on potato processing waste
waters including identification of process and waste streams, effects
of process modification, types of processes and corresponding waste water
treatment processes, effects of waste streams on receiving waters and
land areas, and recent research developments. The report will include
a discussion of current niajor research needs.
ZNQflIIRIES : Contgzc.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i ce o, Rau tck amd Veve2op ven.t
RN 8/68 FedeAaZ IM.te’t. PottuLi o* Contn.ot AgnLnLittatLon
U.S. V4.*JJ €ii.t o the ln.te*.Lo4
ifi LJL _ IL
Waoh.Lng.toit, V. C. 2024?
1/2
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk.ts 4hee2 de c beA bn.L Zy a t R S V G40Jvt tded andv Sec. 5
FexiV Wa. e Pc ...toit Contjwe Ac.t(CteLzn Wtu ejt Re o’t Wnn AcL).
GRANTEE : Department of Food Science and Technology
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Water Pollution Abatement in the United States
Seafoods Industry: State of the Art”
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 1969
PROJECT SITE : Corvallis, Oregon VATE AWARVEP : April 15, 1969
FEVE AL GRAUT : $17,69 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : l8,652.OO
PROJECT JUM8ER : 12060 ECF PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : The objective of this 8 months study will be
the development of a State of the Art document on water pollution
abatement technology arid research for the eefoods processing industry.
INQUiRiES : Con.ta t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O fr. e o ReAea.n ah ar.d Popie,vt
Fed VLAI . Wa.tvL PoUu.t on Con.tjtot Adnt n . .tJ on
U.S. Vepa/t. ivvt o the Tnte/ti /L
Wa4hLngton, V. C. 20242
/13
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4k e2 d c.’ Lbe b:i2 Ly an R z V G .an t itd d c. ndv . Sec. 5,
Fedc tt ciL PoliwtLon Con.t’LOZ Ac tfC. eitiz Wa tQ .’L R to’ a tLon Ac.t).
GRANTEE: National Canners Association
1133-20th Street, N. W.
Washington, DC. 20036
TITLE OF PRO.ThCT : “Production and Disposal Practices for Liquid Wastes
Fi 4 om Canning and Freezing 1 ’ru.its and Vegetables”
May 6, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $20,025 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $22,5 1 i.2
PROJECT W.{BER : 12060 EDK PPBS NO . 1206
VESCFIPTZOII OF PROJECT :
The objective of this one year project will be the development of a.
state-of-art document to encompass: (1) current and projected contri-
bu.tion of this industry to the national water pollution problem;
(2) description Qf present and anticipated waste treatment technology
to include cons truction and operational data (3) identification of
areas requiring further developnient.
INQCIZRIES : Contac tke. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OJ o R civuth a d V ve1opneiv
Fede/LcLt WcL & Pollwtion Co,ttjtot Ad thtW ttio,t
U.S. o th ln. e1uoIL
633 1ncU . iniz Ava. N.W.
Wo4hhzgton, V. C. 20242
HGK I /7I69
-------
I NiOi*1ATION SKEET
June Pi 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’3 Rrica:;cd
This Project is a Class I Grant , under Section__5 Research
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
Ohio State University Research Foundation
13111. Kinnear Rd.
Columtus, Ohio 11.3212
______________ Dr. W. James Harper
215 Vivian Hall
2121 Fyffe Road
Columbus, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : “State of the Art
Systems”
PROJECT SITE : Columbus, Ohio
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EGU
DATE OFFERED : June 17. 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 27, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
FWPCX G ant
,r Contnct
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 6/30/To
$ 18,505
$ 12,954
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of this one year project is the development of a State of the Art
document for the dairy industry. Plant processing methods, water utilization,
waste streams in various size and type of operations, dairy food plant waste
treatment systems as a function of processing practice, plant size and location,
.: urrent industrial development in dairy food processing and waste treatment,
present research in progress and future research needs in relation to dairy
wastes, will be •:overed.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project? Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Mministration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2021+2
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
I
1 +3210
of Dairy Plant Wastes and Waste-Treatment
-------
INFORMATION SI-IEET——
RESEARCH & DEyELOPMENT GRANT
kL6 4h e d sc cLbe L Ly a.n R S V O&cui t c . wLdq..d und t S.zc.. 5;
‘ede/ ctt. PoUwt.Lo;t CO1 JLOZ Act W t.tex P e o ’tctt on Ac.t).
GRMTEE : Beet Sugar Development Foundation
156 South College Avenue
P. 0. Box 538
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
TITLE OF PROJECT : “State-of-Art, Sugarbe&t Processing Waste Treatxtient ”
PROJECT SITE:port Collins, Colorado PATE A ’)ATWEP : April 18, 1969
FEVERA1GRMT: $lLi.,310 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $15,900
PROJECT ?!W ER : 12060 DSI PPSS NO . 1206
VESCR1F’TIOU OF P WJECT :
The objective of this 8 month project will be the development of a
state-of-art document emcompasing current domestic and foreign waste
treatment technology in the sagarbeet. processing industry. The report
will include recommendations on major research needs.
flIQCIIRIES : Con .ta. t . Fie. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O e o Re. s vtck a d Vwelcpneivt
Fedc’uLt Wa.WL Pc ! tJ o . t Con t’toL Aththt t’ut.Uo,i
LI... V pcJ n .t o .th . in c ’L2o’L
Wo.4lthigton, V. C. 2024Z
1/6
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu kee dac.a2beo b*2t Lq a,t R 5 P G’tgn.t auw ded widut SeC.. 5,
FedeAaZ tk Pot2u.tü n Contto Ac t(CLean Wa tut Re. to’cg on Act).
GRANTEE : Beet Sugar Development Foundation
P.O. Box 538
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
TITLE OF PROJECT : Anaerobic-Aerobic Sugar Beet Waste Treatment
PROJECT SITE : Tracy, California PATE ALI1ARVEV : June 1, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $25,300 - 4th year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $243,450
PROJECT NUMBER : WPD 93-04-68 PPBS NO . 1206
PESCRZPTIO 1 V OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to demonstrate
a solution to the pollution and odor problems encountered in beet sugar
factory waste disposal. This will be accomplished by passing the
wastes (mainly screened flume water) through system of anaerobic—f acul-
tative-aerobic lagoons set up in series. Some water from the aerobic
lagoon will be recycled back to the surface of the anaerobic lagoon to
eliminate odors.
INQUIRiES : Coiit c..t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OUi ce 06 Rueiac.k aad Veue1opnen t
RN 8/68 Fede4wZ Wata PoThLt oft Con.t’ t Aáthibva.t on
U.S. Vepatbieait o the intenAok
U I JJ-L _ . _ ... fI.IJ .
WahIthIgto*, P. C. 20242
/11
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—
RESEARCIf & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4ht dacn2be& btit ty an R £ V G a,vt auw ded undtt Se . 5,
Ff4eAat PotZwtLon Contftol Ac.t(CLea,t Wa t t Reatojrca.tLon Aeti.
GRANTEE : Melbourne Water Science Institute
Water Science Laboratories
15-21 Earl Street
Canton, Victoria, Australia
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Cannery Waste Treatment by- Lagoons”
PROJECT SiTE : Shepparton, Victoria DATE ADJARVEV : May 1, 1969
Australia
FEVERAL GRANT $11,920 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $61,810
PROJECT NUMBER : WFD 211-02-68 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 EHS
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
The objective of this study will be to demonstrate the feasibility
of treating fruit and vegetable processing wastes by anaerobic
lagoons and oxidation ditches.
The existing 100,000 gpd facilities at Shepparton will continue
to be us ed during the final year of 2 year project to evaluate and
optimize operational parameters of the anaerobic-aerobic system
operating jointly or independently.
INQUiRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ice o Re.oea*th and VwelopnenC
Fed !/c02 Wa.ttt PoLLution Con..twt AcMjiiLot’tatAo*
U.S. Vepaa.t,,ent o At lnte$4ok
1ff IJL. _ L fILL .
Wa.6h ng.ton, V. C. 20242
/18
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki& heet de4c.ftAbe6 b t Ly an R V Grtan.t auwtded u.ndVL See. 5,
FedeMZ Wate’t Poltutijin Con2itoZ Aet(Ctwt Wa.tejt Rt toM.t on Act).
GRANTEE : Agricultural Experiment Station
University of Puerto Rico
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
TITLE OF PROJECT : Disposal of Rum Distillery Wastes
PROJECT SiTE : Rio Pledras, Puerto RiC 6ATE AWARVEV : July 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRAt4T:$4 6 ,252 1st year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $85,400
PROJECT NLIMBER : WPD-226-ol-68 PP85 NO . 1206
VESCRZPTION OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to develop
the best method for the disposal of rum distillery waste. The waste
will be subjected to detailed analysis and then will undergo pilot
treatment by means of anaerobic digestion, activated sludge, and
lagooning. These processes will then be evaluated in terms of ef-
ficiency and economics.
INQM 1RIES : Conta1 .t At Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O Jce o Rueanx h. aiid VtveZop eenC
8/68 Feduw2 ( ek Po1Zu.t on Con.ttoZ Athn nL6t’ta.t on
U.S. Vepa4b,eji o the Inte’ 4oit
iii fLw. .
Wa h4ng.ton, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORK4ATION SIIEET—-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu kea de.wt.Lbea bjtJ46Zy an R a v G aji.t asi.iur.de4 undtrt See. 6,
FedeitaL Wate.t PoLtutLon Conttoe Aet(CZwt Wa.telt Reo2o’za.t2on Aet).
GRANTEE : HA l Research Corporation
36—40 37th Street
Long Island City, Ne r York 11101
TITLE OF PROJECT ; Improitement of Treatment of Food Industry Waste
PROJECT SiTE : Long Island City, N.Y. DATE AWARVEV Feb. 9, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $40,075/i year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $57,250
PROJECT NUMSER:WPRD j3-01-68 PPBS NO . 1206
PROJECT OFFICER : Allyn Richardson NERO
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
To investigate on a laboratory scale electrocheinical oxidation of milk
whey as a method of waste treatment.
INQUIRiES : COILtW t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWi e o( Rau*th a.d Veuelopnent
HGK 8/68 Fede*aL Wate.’t. PollutLon CorttwZ AthnàiLo*itation
U.S. DepaRbieit.t o the lnte.*4ort
i:: :.J.i _ .. _ .1 ..... :;.u .
Wa k.iiigton, V. C. 20242
/20
-------
INFORMATION HEET- -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLa ahett d c ibt o b Ly an R S V G n.t ajutn4ed u.ndex See. 6,
FedeAa.t Wa te.it PoUwtion Contxot Act(Ctwt Wa.te Re to’ta..t. Dn Act).
GRANTEE:The R. t. French Company
Shelley, Idaho
TITLE OF PROJECT : Aerobic Secondary Treatment of Potato
Processing Wastes with Mechancial Aeration”
PROJECT SITE : Shelley, Idaho PATE AL&IARVEV : Aug. 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $483,217 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $690,310
PROJECT NW4BER : WPRI) 15-01-R1--67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : This project is designed to demonstrate the effec-
tiveness of an aerobic secondary treatment plant for treating the total
flow of potato processing wastes (1 MGD and. 14,580 lb. BOD). The aerobic
treatment will follow an existing primary tteatment plant.
The secondary treatment plant will consist of three earthen aeration
basins equipped. with mechancial surface aerators, a mechancially cleaned
sec ondary clarifier, an aerobic digester, ai . sludge disposal bed.s. In
addition, a silt removal system will be constructed., consisting of
screening facilities, a pumping station, and two earthen ponds to re-
tain silt accumulations for one processing season.
The aeration system will be tested under three operating schemes:
1.) as an extended. aeration system in which biological sludge is returned
to the aeration basin and. the excess, to the digester; 2.) as a flow-
through aeration basin with sludge carryover into the’effluent; and. 3..)
as an intermittent aeration system in which the clarified upper portion
of the aeration basin contents is discharged directly to the river.
During these operations, studies will be made on the effects of foaming
ice, temperature, pH, and nutrients on the efficiency. of the process.
STATUS : Contracts for long lead items such as the aeration equipment
and clarifiers to be awarded within thirty days. Final design and
specifications for construction of the treatment facility to be corn-.
pleted. on or about I b y 1, 1968.
iNQ UiRlES : Con.tae . .tht Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW. e o Re4easteh:amd Vtveiopn At
FedeM.t Wa te4 PoZZati.on Contk.oL .A nàI. 4U(dtLon
4/68 U.S. PepaA .t ent o At In.Wu.o’L
—— 1 __ - . U.N .
W z4hingto.t V. C. 2024t
l i z,
-------
INFORMATION SI1EET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4kte.t dte.,2bta b,t4 & ty a t R I V Grca*t auwr ded undut See. 6,
F de4 tL Watest. Pottution Contjtot Act(CLwt Wa teit Re MaLi on Act).
GRANTEE : FMC Corporation
TITLE OF PROJECT : “CannerY Waste Treatment b r the Kehr Activated Sludge
Process”
PROJECT SiTE : Santa Clara, CaliforniaVATE AWARVEV : December, 1966
FEVERAL GRANT : $29,300 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $43,200
PROJECT NUMBER : WPPD l8—01-67 ppR 5 NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : The Kehr Process, in essence, involves a combin-
ing of activated sludge aeration of 10,000 to 15,000 mg/i mixed liquor
solids with aerobi digestion in a single aeration tank. This provides
high removals of BOD, solids, and nutrients; facility for periodic high
strength wastes; a stabilized, drainable water sludge; and comparatively
low physical plant costs.
The objectives are to:
1. Demonstrate the revised Kebr Process using liquid-solids separation by
high-rate flotation-densifiCation system of activated sludge solids.
2. Demonstrate effectiveness of the process for treating cannery wastes
combined with domestic sewage having a BOD 5 of 1000 to 2000 mg/i.
3. Demonstrate performance of the process with densified return sludge
solids of 4% to 8% on a dry weight basis, thus affecting plant economy by
use of smaller tankage volume.
4. Determine processing requirements for application to a full-scale
treatment plant.
INQ UIRIES : Co.itac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J2e o ReMa* h aasd VeueLopnent
8/68 Fed.*aL Waten PotLu.t2on Conttol i nta..ti o,t
U.S. Vepcitfrent o the Tnte.n.wn.
JH LJ... _ It.. f.L1r
Okz6hAJigtoii, V. C. 2024?
/2Z
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu hu2 de .‘u beo b,tA.t ty au R S V G caitt auv ded wzde* Sec. 6,
FQAuiat ( eJt PoL&t.tLon Cont’LoL Act(Cteagt Wa.tet Re4to*a.t40n Act).
GRANTEE : Minute Maid Company
Orlando, Florida
TITL OF PROJECT : “Removal of Organics and Nutrients from
Citrus Processing Plant Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Leesbui arid Auburnda1 ATE AWARVEV : December 1966
Florida
FEDERAL GRANT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $sso.,ooo
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 38-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
In Florida, about 52 plants of the citrus industry discharge about 130
ingd of waste, having an organic concentration amounting to 318,000 lbs.
of ROD daily, into streams and lakes of F1oz ida. This project is a step
towards solving this pollution problem.
The objective of this project is to demonstrate the design and opera-
tional factors for organic and nutrient removal of citrus process waste
by the activated sludge process, by stabilization in oxidation ponds
with and without induced aeration, and absorption of nutrients by plant
life with subsequent drying of materials in citrus feed mill.
STATUS : Rids have been reviewed, selected, and contract awarded for
construction of treatment facility at Auburndale. At Leesburg, the
site is operational and worthwhile information being collected on
mixed municipal and citrus processing wastes by the activated sludge
system.
Couttaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OWce o Raeivtch. aiid VeveLopnent
FedeMZ Wate PoLfuL o,t Contn.oL
4/68 U .S. Vepe .b eitt o the !nte’ 4on
111 L _ t.L ff t
Woohàigton, V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki& 6&te.t due 2beó M t Zq an R 5 0 Gr’tant ai itde4 undvt Sec. 6,
FedengL Watei Pot(AWon Contjtol Act(CLegn Wa.t t Ruto’calJon Aeti.
GRANTEE : Beet Sugar Development Foundation
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Concentration of Sugar Beet Wastes for Economic Treat-
ment with Biological Systems”
PROJECT SiTE : Fort Collins, Colorado DATE AWARVED : December, 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : $102,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $372,500
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 43-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : The project is one phase of research to find an
economic chemical or biological system to treat high volumes of sugar beet
:‘actory waste. One or more successful processes are necessary to atisfy ef-
fluent standards in States where sugar beets are processed.
The objective of the project is to concentrate sugar—beet factory wastes by
chemical precipitation and reuse ‘of the decanted solution in a closed recir—
culation system. The excess water accumulated during the operation will be
treated by anaerobic and/or aerobic processes to remove BOD prior to discharge.
The bloactivity will be studied concurrently.
iNQ UiR1ES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
0U1ce 06 Re ea.itch a..d Veuelopnent
FedeML Wa.te.a PoUu tA.on Con.UtoZ Aán nt’ gt on
U.S. V*’Lb,ent o the inten4ort
uv iJL __ t — -
W ihbtgto i, V. C. 2024f
/21
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLd &hu.t d ae tLbe6 bnit y an R V G*a,t auwtded undUL See. 6,
F dtvt.LL (Ua.W PoUat. on Cont,toL Ac.t(Ctean Wat Rc.otoicaZLon Act).
GRANTEE : North Star Research & Development Institute
3100 38th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406
TiTLE OF P,WJECT:U5e of Fungi Imperfecti in Waste Control
PROJECT SITE : Minneapolis, Minnesota PATE AWARVEV : Sept. 1, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $76,585 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $118,585
PROJECT NUMBER:WpIUj 49-01-68 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 EHT
VESCRIPTZON OF PROJECT :
The objective of this 2 year project is to evaluate rapidly growing fungi
strains for use in biological waste treatment processes applicable to
waste streams from soybean and corn process .ng operations.
Synthesized mycelium will be evaluat d for use as animal and/or human
dietary supplement.
Parameters for industrial scale-up to accomodate a 1-3 mgd process
operation will be determined based on results from a 50 gpd pilot plant
operating on a continuous culture and flow basis.
INQUIRiES : Conta tiLt Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O Lce. . Re.aea’cck and Vev 1opnen.t
HGK 8/68 FedeML Wa.tUL PoUwt on ContkoL A ,i n2tat on
U.S. Ptpaixbteitt o At bL M4ok
ill Li _ LL
WaikAng.ton, V. C. 20242
/25
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu 4he1.t d cjtLbto b t 4 an R £ V G an .t auwtded widen’. Sec. 6,
Fede*iti (0ate’ P0ULLt Dn Conttot Ae.t(Cteait OJa.Cv,. Re4to*atLon Act).
GRANTEE : John Morrell & Company
Ott uinwa, Iowa 52501
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Construction and Study of a Demonstration Plant
Utilizing the Aerobic Channel Method for Treating
Packinghouse Wast estt
PROJECT SZTE:Ottumwa , Iowa VATE ALMRVEV : December 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : $489,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $815,000
PROJECT NUM8ER : WPRD-54-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT:Four oxidation channels will be constructed to han-
dle an equivalent load of 20,000 lbs. of BOD/day from a packinghouse on
a 7-day basis with estimated flow of 3.5 mgd. The objective is to find an
efficient, effective, and economical method of treating raw packinghouse
wastes so they can be discharged directly into streams.
Each channel will be 460 ft. X 60 ft. with a capacity of 150,000 Cu.
ft. Channels l&2 will receive raw wastewater from existing primary treat-
ment systems, The overflow will be directed into Channels 3&4 which will
be operated intermittently as. aerator and settling basins. Channel 4 will
allow the sludge to be returned to Channels l&2 or removed for harvesting.
The solids removed will be centrifuged or evaporated and dried.
The most feasible way of handling solids will be determined. Tests will
be conducted to determine if the dried solids can be used an an animal-
food supplement.
The process will be designed to give variable rates of aeration and
flow to obtain maximum bio-chemical oxygen demand and nitrogen removal.
The flow will be sampled and analyzed for total nitrogen, chemical oxygen
demand, suspended solids, total solids, and grease; weekly samples will
be tested for total volatile solids, total fixed solids, phosphate, total
bacterial content, and coliforin count.
STATUS : Final design and speci ications for the treatment facility have
been completed. Expect to advertise for bids no latter than April 15,1968
and begin construction during May 1968.
INQUiRIES : Coataet 4J Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O66JJ e o Re4ewtck aiid Vevelopiient
Fedvtat ci e.& PoLtut2oa Con2jv.oL A 1iLnt a.t2o,t
4/68 U.S. VepoJt.b,ent o the inten4ok
III •i ___ .i. t rc..w. .
Waoh ng.toii, V. C. 20242
IL’
-------
INFORMATiON SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThLo okee.t deoea2bu blt4g ty an R S V Gtan.t azwitded undvL Sec. 6,
FedeM2 Watek PotZu.tLon Cont&oZ Ae.t(Ctean Wa..tvE. RuCo’ a.tAon Aeti.
GRANTEE:vahlsing, Inc.
Easton, Maine
TITLE OF PROJECT:”Treatnient of Alkaline Wastes from Potato
Processing”
PROJECT SiTE : Easton, Maine DATE AWARDED : December 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : $196,014 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $280,020
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 56-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT :
The objectives of this project are to demonstrate the feasibility of;
treating potato processing waste using the activated sludge s tem ; com-
bining potato processing waste with sugar beet refining waste; and the
feasibility of three in -plant closed waste water systems in the sugar
beet plant.
The project will provide extremely valuable data to both the potato
processing and beet sugar industry. The aim is also to determine if
a $30 million industrial complex, composed of potato and sugar beet
processing and a residential conununity, can exist on a small stream,
as is proposed, and have clean water.
STATUS : Expect to receive fim l design arid specifications for con-
struction of the 600 gpm pilot scale activated sludge system, and
proceed with advertisement thereof April 1, 1968, construction to
begin shortly after May 1, 1968.
INQUIRiES : Con*. e.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O 2ce o Raea*ck amd DtueL.pnent
4/68 Fede*aZ Wt te4 PcLh&t o.t Copt L A,iàt &.t’ tAon
U.S. Vep .eiit o At late/ .4ok
ø JLL. LU .
Wa4IiA.ngton,P. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET’-—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk64he,tdeo .4rpJ.bu 6,
Fedena.L (i .te PoLLutLon Con.tiv.o 4c2(Ctean Wa.te& Re6to*a.t on Ac t).
GRANTEE• Snokist Growers (formerly Blue Ribbon-Big Y Grow s)
Yakinia, Washington
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Pollution Prevention by Aeration of Fruit
Processing Wastes.”
PROJECT SiTE : yalcima, Washington PATE AWARPEV : August 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $347,669 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$572,262
PROJECT NUM8ER:wppj 58-01—68 PPSS NO . 1206
VESCRIPflON OF PROJECT. e cannery now discharges it fruit-processing
wastes into tI e Yakima River. The objective of this project is to de-
termine the most economical method of removing 90% of the BOD from an
expected flow of 2.6 MGD with a BOD5 loading of 20,000 lbs.
Aeration methods, including modifications to the activated sludge
process, will be tested on a plant-size scale to determine their effec-
tiveness in treating fruit processing wastes.
Existing and specially designed new facilities, including lagoons
and clarifiers, will be used in prototype studies of the effects of
varying amounts of aeration, waste load1 waste detention, sludge re-
turns, and chemical on the BOD level.
During the 1967 canning season, the lagoon and clarifier will be
operated as a completely mixed activated-sludge facility. The new la-
goon, with added aerators will, operated as an aeration lagoon with no
sludge return, each under varied loadings. During the 1968 canning season
the facilities will be operated as a modified contact stabilization
facility.
Information on the modifications will be compared and the results will
be applied to the activated sludge process for use by industry and govern-
ment as method for the biological treatment of fruit processing wastes.
STATUS : Aeration basin completed and operational. Contracts being awarded
for balance of construction. Facility to be completely operational by
September 1968.
INQUIRIES : Contaet the Industrial Pbllution Control Branch
OWze 06 Re4ea* k usd Veuelopnestt
Fedeiw2 Watet PoLtu.t o* Conticot Aá,thI.L6tkat2oa
4/68 U.S. Vepa4b,ent 06 the Inte., 4ot
J!J Li-L..... L.. U.IJ .
Wo3h ng.to.IP. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkIA 4heet de c..tLbeo bn2tf Zy an R i V Gtan.t auwtded wtdeit Sea. 6,
FeJdeAaL WiU,j,. PoF1u.t. on ContJLoZ Ac.t(CUa,i Wa2ex Re6to’tzz.tAon Act).
GRANTEE : National Canners Association Research Foundation
1133 20th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20036
TiTLE OF PROJECT:”Reconditionlng and Reuse of Food Processing Brinos”
PROJECT SITE : Central Valley, Calif. PATE AWARVEV : February 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $31,500 TOTAL E.ST. PROJ. COST : $45,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD—134—0l—68 PPB 5 NO . 1206
12060 EHTJ
VESCR!PflON OF PROJECT : Briefly the, proposal is to conduct a pilot
scale stuxly to determine the feasibility of re-using spent brines froni
storage end processing operations in olive packing by reconditioning
the brine through a charcoal absorption and filtration column. Tho
portable filter will be operated throughout the duration of the two
year project at each of four locations in the California Central Valley
area.
The supporting collection, reduction and analysis of data will be
directed toward e1im .nating the present tie—in to municipal sewage
system as well as lagoon systems used by olive processors and develop
economici and effectiveness data for full scale development.
TNQ UTR1ES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i z e o Re&catck and Peuetopnen.t
FfdeAaZ Wa.te’t PoLLut4on CQn.tiwt
8/68 U,S. Pepa,ament o the ln eiv.w’t
U I I.JL . .1...... JJ.U .
WadhAngton,V. C. 20242
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL6 4hu.t dt&cn2bu bn2t çLq au R E V G an.t, auw ded wtdtn See.. 6,
Fede*aL tek PoUu.tijnt Conttot Aet(CLwt Wa.tui. Ru o’tat4on Act).
National Canners Association
GRANTEE : 1133 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Integrated Treatment of Liquid Wastes from
Food Canning Operations??
PROJECT SITE : San Jose, lifornia PATE AWARVEV : 2/14/68
FEVERAL GRANT : $33,330 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $55,120
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 151-01-68 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : The objectives of this proposal are as follows:
(1) to determine the feasibility of employing a high rate t:i:ickling fil-
ter in the San Jose, California canning plant to treat strong organic
wastes encountered in vegetable and fruit processing operations, which
although low in volume (approx. 20% of total), contribute as much as 60%
to the total HOD load. The fi’ter will be 14 ft. in diameter and 21.5 ft.
high, employing synthetic media and operating in a range between 100 and
200 gpm. It will be subjected to variations in flow, pH control and nu-
trient addition to determine its optimun working parameters. (2) To de-
termine the effectiveness of using an air flotation process with and with-
out addition of I locculants in removing suspended solids prior to secon-
dary treatment. (3) To evaluate ceflter discharge solids separation tech-
niques and its effect on the total HOD content.
A study will also be made of the usage of edible acids as a bacteriostatjc
agent to prevent growth in recirculated flume water. Following the one
year testing operation, it is proposed to select units to be incorporated
in full scale plant operations for a further demonstration project. The
reason for the low project cost is due to NCA already having on hand
several pieces of equipment required to test these processes.
STATUS : Received worthwhile information on operation of units during
last fall’s processing operations. Will continue with evaluation of the
various units this fall.
INQUiRIES : Coit .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW.ce 06 Re6ta k amd VeveZop en.t
4/68 FedeML Wa tex PolitWoii Con2kol AA,,JjtLUjwJ4on
U.S. Pepa4b,eJIt o the InUflLM
ill L.i1 __ .L _ . ILIJ .
WaahAugtou, V. C. 2024?
/30
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki s 4hte..t d AetLbeA bn .Lt Zy an R S P Gka,vt aj )3)r4f4 (Lfld JL SeC. 6,
FedeAaL Wa.ten, Pof.2u21on Cont/LoZ Act(Cteait Wa2e,t Re.o o’cat n Act).
GRANTEE : Winter Garden Citrus Products Cooperative
P. 0. Box 399
Winter Garden, Florida
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Lime Treatment end Inplànt Reuse of an Activated
Sludge Plant Effluent in the Citrus Processing
Industry
PROJECT SITE : Winter Garden, Florida PATE AWARVEV : March 22, 1968
FEVERAL GRANTS ].65,0O0 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 397,300
PROJECT NUMBER: WPRD-16l-DI-(R-2)-68pp8S NO . 1206
PESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : The objective of this proposal will be to
develop operational parameters and conduct an economic evaluation on
lime treatment of effluent from a 2 ingd. activated sludge system treat-
ing citrus wastes and in—plant reuse of the lime treatment effluent.
This study will cover lime treatment, with the addition of coagulant
aids, and dewatering of sludges by centrifugation for usage in cattle
feed preparation. Determination will be made, on this system’ s effective
in further reducing BOD, COD, and nutrients found in the activated
sludge effluent.
The proposed project intends to demonstrate the effectiveness of lime
precipitation on eff] uent from a 2 ingd. activated sludge system treating
citrus wastes. The activated sludge system consists of an aeration pond
providing from 24 to 36 hours detention time with the overflow being
directed into a final clarifier. Operation of the activated sludge system
will afford pH control along with nutrient supplementation and sludge re-
circulation.
iNQUiRIES : Contac.t tht Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O 4ix e o Re6ea.’tck ar4 V etopnen.t
FQde/taZ Wa2eja PoLLu.t on Contjto
4/68 U.S. V pojpJjncjtt o Ae l ,t e)t.cok
11J 1 . _ IL — •1 , _ . J,J,rU .
Wa h4.ngton, V. C. 20242
/3/
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu & hut daen4 be& bn2t 4 an R S V G a tt anw 4ed undes . See. 6,
FedewL Wate.n. PcLZu.ti on Cont .ot Ac.t (CLean Wa2vt Re &2o’z&tLon Ae.t).
Swift and Company
GRANTEE . R&D Center
1919 Swift Drive
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
TITLE OF PROJECT : ??Remova l and Recovery of Fatty P terials from
Edible Fat and Oil Refinery Effluents”
PROJECT SiTE : Bradley, Illinois VATE AWARDED : JUL 2. 0
FEDERAL GRANT : $249,307 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $389,970
PROJECT NW8ER:wPRD 1a5 ...O1..(R _ 1) _ 68pp NO . 1206
12060 DQV
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
The 18 month study to be conducted at the Swift and (bmpany Bradley
Refinery plant will have as its main objectives to demonstrate the
effectiveness and economics of employing air flotation for the re-
movai. and recovery of fatty material present in water eminating from
processing operations.
In addition to an extensive study of flocculating agents, a complete
characterization of processing waste streams is planned. Laboratory
analysis will include BOD, COD, ether solubles and suspended solids
determinations, etc.
INQJJIRIES : Contae.t the Industrial Pollution ck ,ntrol Branch
OWee o Re ewtck aad Developnent
Fede.’vtL Wa2eit Poth&tion Co WtoL Athnc it.L6tkat4on
U.S. ?)epa*.b,en. o At in en4o*
il-I
HGK:5/68 WMILUI9.ton, V. C. 20242
/32
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL& &hu.t daenibes bn2t Ly an R g V G .wt t au .k4ed undui See. 6
FedeitD2 Wa.te.rt PoLtLLtion Conttot Act(Ctwt Wa.tut Ra.to*a.tLon
GRANTEE : Dairy Research and Development Corporation
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Elimination of Pollution by and Utilization of
Protein Concentrates (Dried Whey) from Milk Residues of Cheese Making”
PROJECT SiTE : Remsen, New York DATE AWARDED : December 19, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $ 551,350 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $4,234,071
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-219-0l-R1 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 DEQ
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : A development and full scale demonstration for
a process for the conversion of dairy whey into saleable food products
by evaporation and spray drying methods. The conversion of whey to a
useable food product in lieu of its disposal as a waste product from
cheese manufacturing is the pollution abatement method to be developed
and demonstrated. Research will be conducted on the use of dried
whey as a supplement to various food products.
INQUIRiES : Con.tdet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW2e 06 Re4eaa. k a&id DeudopnesLt
F,4ejwi Wa.tet Poll u’on Con tML Ath,I It4t, a.ti on
U.S. Vepa4b, tiit 06 the intei o4
us i.i _ u _ (s __
Wa hAngton, P. C. 20242
‘33
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 oku.t due tJbe.o bit4t ty an 6V Gitajit a&iw.,ded undex See. 6,
Fed 4 L Wa tVL PoZZutLon Cont*oL Ae t(CZean Wa tex Reo2ota.tion Act).
GRANTEE : Corn Products Conipany
Corporate Engineering
P.O. Box 3145
Aigp Illinois 60501
TITLE OF PROJE’CT : ‘ Treatment of Wastes from the Wet-Milling Industry”
PROJECT SITE : Pekin, Illinois VATE AIUARVEV : ju 24, 1968
FEDERAL. GRANT : $1482, 680 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2, 56, 1400
PROJECT NUMBER : wPRD-22l-o].-(i -1)-6 8 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 DPE
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : The 3 year project entails the design,
construction, operation, and an economic and technical, evaluation
of a 1 mgd completely mixed aerobic system for treatment of corn
refining wastes.
IN U1RIES : Contact At Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J2e o Re4u*ck a.id Veve2op ien t
FedenaZ ‘Sate& PoLLu.Uon Co,WwZ Adn nL t’ta.t on
U.S. Vtp 4bIeJit o £he Inte t.w*
iLl t..i __ -t- u _ w _
Waakiivgton, V. C. 2024?
•/3f
-------
INFORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4hee. de ett2beo b2t Itj an R 6 V G&an.t a&.z’tded u.nde4 Sec . 6,
Fede aL Wc2VL Poth&t on Cont’iot Ac.t(CLean Wa.tvt RQ4to’&at40n Ac..t .
GRANTEE : University of Ok1 homa Research Institute
1808 I evton Drive
Norman, OkiRlioma 73069
TitLE OF PROJECT : “Demonstration of a Full Scale Waste Treatn ent
System for a Cannery”
PReJEc-r SITE : Sti].well, Oklahoma VAlE AWARVEV : JUL 2 5
FEDERAL GRANT : $75, 226 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $117, 807
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-230-Ol-(R-1) 68 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 DSB
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : The objectives of. this 16 month at dy will
be to conduct an economic and technical evaluation of a 1.5 mgd
bio1ogi al syBtem employing a con bination of both the min 4 n1 l solids
and e ctended aeration te&nEques to treat high strength, nutritionally
unbale-nced cannery wastes.
INQUIRIES : CoP1t4 the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW.ce o Rrnandi. amd VeveZopneiit
F,4vw2 (Uateit PoLLution Coit toZ AthniaLi t’w.tion
U.S. Vepan.tiien.t o the Tntv ok
III L _ __ L... H.P .
Waik.in ton, V. C. 20242
/35.
-------
‘I ()R MArION Sn
RESEARCH & I)LVEI,OPMENT CRANT
Th “leQi d c’t2b b Le ty an R S V Giuuu au.’w dui undvc. Sec.. 6,
Fc ’ z (i ’a tVt PoUat4.on Conljwt Aci Ctean Wa2VL Re. ton.a.t on Act).
( ?.y ’rEc: Far nbest, Inc.
Deni son, Iowa
ilTL OF FIWJECT : Waste Treatment Facility, Farmbest, Inc.,
Denison, Iowa
pgOJECT SITE : Denison, Iowa PATE AWARVEV : October 5, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $289, 9O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $755, 587
PWJECT NLL’IBER : WPRD 2141 01 -68 PPBS NO . i c 6
12060 DFF
VE.SCRIT’rION OF PROJECfl
This is a 15 month project to demonstrate, over one full year of
operation, the application of anaerobic lagoons and two-stage trickling
filters for the treatment of strong wastes resulting from the slaughter-
ing and processing of hogs. This plant kills about 5000 hogs daily and
waste flows average about 0.85 mgd. Data vi].). be collected on the
strength of wastes and the efficiency of individual treatment units
under various loadings and weather conditions so the results can be
pr9jected for new plants using any combinations of these treatment units.
INQUIRIES : Copitgc.t dte
OW2e o Re owv k tid VeveLopne.tt
Fedeiw2 Wa.tet PoL2u t. on Con.ttot Aán vLWcat oa
U.S. VtpcAIJne.nt o Ae Isttefliok
trr iJi ... .t.. itc. .
Wa4hJ.ngton, P. C. 20242
-------
Ti )i MATIQN S} ET
IQf Q
RESEARCH, DEVELOPI€NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr 1 1 c- J (‘a::- (3
Th Project is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Fcdcral Watc r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
____________________ Nat .ona]. Canners As8ociation, Research Foundation
1133 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036
_______________ Mr. Walter Mercer, NCA Western Research Laboratory
1950 Sixth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
TIThi OF PROJECT : “Evaluation of Control]ed Temperature and Forced Aeration
in Trickling Filter Treatment of Food Canning Waste Waters”
PROJECT SITE : San Jose, California
PROGRAM (PROJECT) ISTIIMBER;
DATE OFFERED : May 15, 1969
12060 EAE
DATh ACCEPTED (AWARDED):June 10, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
!WPCKG nt
r Contr ct
Amount
from: May 15,
1969
Thru: Nov. 15,
1969
$ 28,712
$ 18,350
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The objectives of this project to be conducted at the
DelMonte Corporation Plant No. 3 at San Jose, California are as follows:
1. To evaluate the performance and BOD reduction capacity on high
strength liquid canning wastes of a 10,000 gpd trickling filter
unit containing such special features as forced aeration and
temperature control of the treatment column preceeded by grinding
and screening components.
2. To compare the efficiency of this unit with that of the trickling
filter without temperature control and foi ced aeration operated
under WPRD 151-01—68, by subjecting them both to identical loadings
eniinating from the sane waste source.
3. To incorporate the results of this evaluation into the design of a
full scale demonstration project to be implemented in 1970. The
six month project is an extension of work initiated under WPRD 251-
01-68.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202112
/37
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
Natne and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
-------
Ti’fl ‘ .)i NATION SKEET
6/16/69
RESEARCH, DEVELOP ’ENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr, b ” 1 c ica : d
PCDjt C1 is a C]ass V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Wat. r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRAIITEE OR CONTRACTOR : Gold 1 (1st Poultr , Division
(Name and Address) Cotton Producers Association
P. 0. Box 2210
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Byron Hawkins
(Name and Address)Gold Kist Poultry
910 Latta Street
Durham, i Lc. 277014.
TITLt: OF PROJECT : “Water and Waste Management in Poultry Processing”
PROJECT SITE : Gold 1(1st Poultry
910 Latta Street
Durham, N.C.
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EGV
DATE OFFERED : June 12, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWAEDED):June 26, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
FWPCA G: nt
r Contr t
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 6/30/71
—
$ 283,381
$198,366
DE3CRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The University of North Carolina will conduct a two year study which involves
changes in the Gold Kist processing operations for demonstration of effective
in-plant control of both water use and discharge of effluent from poultry
processing. The project encompasses water use and waste abatement throughout
the plant, from water intake through final waste-water collection and control.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2 42
-------
Ti’ : thU1ATION SHEET
7/10/69
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMBNT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date t’ b’ 1 c’ica:.r d
Thl .s Projeci. is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
Western Potato Service, Inc.
P. 0. Box 1391 Highway #2 West
Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201
PROJECT DIRECTOR : James L. Martin
(Name and Address) Potato Service, Inc.
P. 0. BOx 809
Presque Isle, Maine 011.769
TITLE: OF PROJECT : “Full Scale Demonstration and Evaluation of Potato Dry
and Wet Caustic Peeling Processes”
PROJECT SITE : Presque Isle Maine (Wet)
Grand Forks, North Dakota (Dry)
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EIG
DATE OFFERED& 7 / i4 p
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):July 22, 1969
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of.this grant will be to demons.trate at full scale the economics
and pollution reduction characteristics of a potato “dry” caustic peeling
system and use as a base for comparison data to be obtained from a similar
facility employing the conventional “wet” caustic peeling operation.
IN t.TIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Departthent of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2l 2
S
Grant or
Contract
Period
Elj€ib le
Grant
Period Costs
?WPCKG ant
r Contract
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 1/1/71
*1,011.2,212
*396,5711.
-------
I . 1 . 1 ATI0N SHEET
Au u t_18.. 19 9
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr, ti’ 1(ri &::-r1
PCD,jcci is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRAITEE _ OR CONTRACTOR :
( Nmnc’ and Addr ’ss)
Crowley’s Milk Company, Inc.
111.5 Conklin Avenue
BinChamton, N.Y. 13902
_______________ Dr. Robert R. Za1J.
Director of’ Research & Peoduction
Crowley’s Milk Company, Inc.
114.5 Conklin Avenue
TITLi OF PROJECT Binghamton, N., Y. 13902
Deve1opmeflt and Demonstration of an Ultrafiltration Plant for
the Abatement of Pollution from Cottage Cheese Whey”
PROJECT SITE : Ph. 1 Binghamton, New York
PROGRAi (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 D
DATE OFFERED : August 8, 1969
Y TL ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
FWPCA r; nt
)r Contr.ct
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 1/1/72
$91 +,o81
$i1 95,856
DE.3CRIPTION OF PROJECT :
A two stage Ultrafiltration system for the separation and concentration of
protein and lactose or straight acid whey concentration with a resulting
influcnt BOD reduction of 99% will be demonstrated. The first phase, lasting
13 months, calls for the design, detailed engineering, construction, opera-
tion and evaluation in Binghamton, N. Y. of a 10,000 lb/day UF system and
will include the design of a 250,0b0 lb/day system for full scale demonstration
under phase II. Duration of phase II will be 17 months.
II [ tJIRIES:
Contact Pro ject Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. epartment 01’ the Intcrior
Washington, D. C. 202142
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( i arne and Address )
-------
PPB 1207
MACHINERY & TRANSFORTATION EQUIPMENT
12070
Letters To GPO PH
WEfl
117 Johns Hopkins Univ.—Renn H. Snyder E. Dulaney
12070
WPRD Letters To GPO
-------
INFORMATION SHEET ——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TitLe eheei deacxLbeo btLt4ty an R 5 V G’tant aunn.ded unda Sec. 6,
Ftde*aZ Wa..tet Pottu.tcon Contitot Act(Ctu.n Wa.tex RutonstLon Aetl.
GRAJffEE : The Johns-Hopkins University, Dr. Charles E. Renn
Department of Environmental Engineering Science
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Management of Recycled Waste-Process Water Ponds
PROJECT SITE : Hampstead, Maryland VATE ALUARVEV : December 1, 1967
FEPERAI. GRANT : $39,627.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $180,921
PROJECT NUMBER : WPD 117-03 PPBS MO . 1207
VESCRZPflON OF PROJECT : Grant Period: 12 months
The purpose of this project is to develop detailed information on the
operational techniques required to permit the utilization of a limited
supply of treated domestic wastewaters for a variety of manufacturing
processes. Requirements for control of biological processes in waste-
waters impounded and recycled extensively within manufacturing processes
and operations is being investigated.
The project is being conducted at the Black and Decker Manufacturing
Companys’ Hampstead, Md. plant.0perations in the plant involve stamping,
pressiug, punching, grinding, forging, assembly, and performance testing
in a controlled environment requiring 2600 tons of refrigeration for air
conditioning during the w nn months. The water supply from wells is very
limited. Domestic wastewaters are treated and routed to a nine acre
impoundment for recirculation through the plant processes and operations.
A 1 ?no_ ditiona.l...cost?’ time extension has been requested to permit
further evaluation through another sinner season.
INQUIRIES : Contae.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J.ce o Reoeaach aitd Veuelopnestt
Fednat (&ta PottutZon Conttot AAnino.tnaztion
U.S Vgsfrent a the Intnifl
633 I nd iana An. LW.
(thkUgton, V. C. 20242
ELD 3/69 /92 .
-------
PPB 1208
STONE, CLAY & GLASS PRODUCTS
12080
WP Letters To GPO PM
12080
WPRD Letters To GPO PM
87 Johns-Manville Products Corp. R. Christensen E. Dulaney
j ç
-------
LOCATION OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT INDUSTRY
PPB 1206: Stone, Clay, Glas Products
Hudson Champla
. 1
I
R I Virgin I
I i
L!s 1a j
Jun 1967
V S D, a.1 .nI •t t
I,di.. wa!,.’ P d v ” Co. $.oI £I OI%
Co!u(r)bi
Ce nt :1
ngland
Estuary
-------
1NFC)1 MAT1ON S}IEET
RESEARCII & !)EVEIPOPMENT GRANT
Th. dc c ibe b’ J t( j a t R S V Gwvt a rui.ded ELndVL Se . 6,
F :d k 2 tCc/L PoLLu io t Co,W oL Ac t(C .eait Wa.WL Re o’t&t t Ac.t .
G: ,WTEE : Johns -Many ille Products Corporation
thnvi1lc, New Jersey
TTrLE OF PROJECT : ‘Experimer1ta1 Closed Water System to Eliminate
Waste Water Discharge from Johns-Manvillc Plant No. 3 ’.
P C)JECT SITE:Defiance , Ohio PATE A(UARVEV:September 1, 1967
F E ,’ L G AWT:$82, 5O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $164,700
PPCJECT_?!L. BER: WPRD 87-01-67 PPBS blO . 1208
12bgOE F
VFSCR PT1OM OF PROJECT :
This project is designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of a
total process-water reuse system involving diatomite filtrationW
treat wastes from the production of glass fiber insulations and
elcinents.
T objective of this project is to eliminate completely the
discharge of phenolic waste water from the Johns -Manville Plant. The
plant now discharges 30 to 50 gpm of waste water which eventually
£low into the Maumee River. This river has been cited as one of
the critically polluted rivers of the nation.
The waste water now contains glass fiber, caustic, and phenols.
As a part of the project, all of the process waste water will be
r circulatod. The residual solids, consisting of glass fibers and
phenolic binders, will be removed by screening and diatomite
filtration. Caustic cleaning solutions will be segregated from
the z .anufacturing process water, ponded, and treated as required
for dumping or for return to plant process use.
PR RESS TO MARCH 25, 1968 : Approval to purchase certain long-lead items
of equipment on low bids has been given with repayment subject to appro-
val of the final plans and specifications. The final plans and specifica-
tions are complete except for theelectrical wiring and should be submitted
for approval within two weeks.
flIQpIRIES : Co a e.t th Industrial Po3.lujion Cont 01 Br nch
O 4 c o Re.4e4XC L a 4 D vitopneiu
F de,uzL Wa te/t Pothi.tJ on Con.t’wt An24 tFutt m
ELD:3/68 . he ln.tc/c.ok
-------
PPB 1209
T XLTILE MELL PRODUCTS
12090
Letters To GPO FM
ECU N. Carolina State U. H. Snyder C. Ris
ECS Clemsbn U. — Porter D. Hill C. Ris
EOX Clemson U. — Porter A. Garrison C. Ris
WPRD Letters To GPO __________
100 EUX Fiber Industries R. Thacker C. Ris
216 ESU American Enka Corp. E. Lomasney C. His
]]WM C. H. Masland & Sons D. Smith C. His
/47
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR FIBER & FINISHIM INDUSTRIES
PPB 1209: Textiles Mill Products
ngland
re Estuary
ke- Susq ueha n na
June 1 67
U. S. D ’’ . & .
Fe . i W er P ,”u, ’i Co& oF Ac ’
f erto Ricoj
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThL4 £h e2 dt 2be4 bn..La Lg an R £ V Cw t c. sxvLd 4 undv . See. 6,
Fede L ttkz.tVL PoUwt.i.OR Co,s..t.’Lo Ac. t(Cewt W te.’L ono ,Uon Act).
GRANTEE : North Carolina State University
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
TITLE OF_PROJECT: tt Textile Based Water Pollution-Information Study’ t
PROJECT SiTE : Raleigh, North Carolina DATE A!’IARVEV : May 9, 1969
FEVEZAL 6R !T:$io,I io TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $12,638
PROJCCT !UM8ER: 12090 cU PPBS NO . 1209
VESCRfl’flOfl OF PROJECT :
Collection of, abstracting and indexing eli available literature dealing
with water pollution from textile based sources, and preparation and
storage of this information into the Water Resources Scientific Information
‘System. Correlate information between the Water Resources Scientific
Informatio Center, USD1, the M.I.T.Textile Center and the Shirley
Institute thesauri.
Project Duration: 8 months
JNQ 1RIES : Con. aet .ti Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OJ .ee. o Rc eLvtch a’4 Vwe2opne v
Fede t Wa.Cci . Pothz.t int Contjtot Ac thvL.stuvt on
U.S. V p ti r n. o tha In.t Lo.t
633 Ind.ütna. Av2.. N.W.
Wo4h.&tg ton, V. C. 20242
HGK/L /69 /4 ?
-------
I N ‘0HW TION SHEET
SEABCH, DEVZLOP1€I T, OR ] EMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ lic’ica cd
This Project is a Class I Grant_, under Section 5 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
Department of Textiles
School of 114 & IS
Clemson University
Clemson. S.C. 29631
Dr. John J. Porter
TITLi OF PROJECT : Survey of the State of the Art of Textile Waste
Treatment
PROJECT SITE : Clemson University
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12090 ECS
DATE OFFERED : June 20, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):June 24, 1969
om: July
1969
Thru: une
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The study will include characterization of the
liquid wastes from the major manufacturing processes as to composi-
tion and quantity per unit of product on’ identify successful and
unsuccessful treatment processes and disposal practices presently in
use. and suggest alternatives for least satisfactory practices.
The study will be directed towards identifying areas most in need of
research and those areas where research effort is most likely to
yield beneficial results.
tN UIRIES:
ELD
6/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and. Development
Federal Water Pollvtion Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2 42
, .o
Grant
or
Eligible
Contr ot
Contract
Grant
AMount
Period
Period Costs -
1.
30
$31.675
$30. 007
-------
INI’0I MATI0N SREET
RESEABCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tn b• 11 1cqccd
Thts Project is a Research Grant , under Section 5
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRA}TEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
Department of’ Textiles; School of fl4&TS; Cleinsnn,
University; Clemson, South Carolina 29631
Dr. John J. Porter, Department of’ Textiles
Cler.sori University, Clemson, South Carolina
2 631
TITLE OF ROJEC : A Study of the Photochemical Degradation of Comx ercial Dyes
PROJECT SITE : Clemson University; Clemson, South Carolina
PROGRAM (PROJECT) Nt ER : 12090 EOX
DATE OFFERED : July 22, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
August 20, 1969
DESCRIPTION OF PROiECT :
Grant or
Contract
Period
E1i ib1e
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA Grant
)r Contract
Amount
From: 8/1/69
Thru: 7/31/70
$ 3 1, L 1
$31,539
The objectives of -his 12 month research project are to define and characterize
the products of decomDosition resulting from ultraviolet radiation of selected
commercial textile d:ies. The characterization will include aistincuishing
between photochernical and h ,dro1ytica11y produced decomposition products.
INQUIRIES:
c u
7/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of’ the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O21 2
/3/
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENt GRANT
TkLo okeet d 3cj,2bt6 bJtJ Ly an R 5 V G an t aw tded tuide.t San. 6,
Fede.a o2 (Ua.te.sc. PoZ2u2Lo,t Cont’i.oL Ac.t(CLwi Wa tejt Re o*&t .Lon Ac.t).
GRANTEE : iber Industries, Inc.
Box 100 8
Charlotte, North Carolina 28201
TITLE OF PROJECT : Reuse of Plant Effluent and Cooling Water Blowdowri as
Process Water.
PROJECT SITE : Shelby, North Carolina VATE AWARVEV : April 4, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $500,000
PROJECT NWER: 100-01-68 pp 1209
1 090 EUX
VESCR!PflON OF PROjECT : kn existing facility provides treatment for the
combined sanitary and equalized chemical process waste waters from a syn-
thetic fiber manufacturing plant. Treatment facilities consist of extended
activated sludge aeration basins, clarifier, polishing ponds, an aerobic
sludge digestion basin, and a sludge holding pond.
The project will evaluate treatability of this waste in a plastic media
trickling filter, feasibility of algae removal from the polishing pond ef-
fluent by use of microscreen filters, feasibility of BOD, COD, color, odor
and taste reduction in the final effluent by use of powdered carbon for the
purpose of ultimate reuse of the effluent as process makeup water, and
chromate reduction of cooling tower blowdown to permit treatment in the waste
treatment plant.
INQLUIR 1ES : Cont ct At Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O cce o Re6eoMh . aisd Veve.Lopien.t
Fedvw2 ti te’i PoUu.tLon ConU,.oL Athn n ica.t on
U.S Vepa b esit o At
ELD 7/68 T i.ia:..i ‘L:L fL .-
Wa4h itgtoJI, V. C. 2O24
ic&
-------
INFORMATION SHEET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü hee t deae’tibeo b 4* Zy WI R S V Gkajlt azavcded widrA See. 6,
Fedeiwt Wi.te t PoZ2ut4on Contir.oL Aet(CZwt Wa teJt RutoMt on Aet}.
GRANTEE : American nk Corporation
Enka, North Carolina
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Zinc Precipitation and Recovery Plant”
PROJECT SiTE: North carolina PATE AWARVEV : May 24, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $282,700 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $ 3o,4] ’
PROJECT NUMBER : WpRD-216-ol-(R-l)-68 PPBS NQ . 1209
12090 ESG
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The objectives of this 20 month full scale
demonstration project to remove soluble zinc emitted from spin bath
operations in the manufacture of viscose ra ron are as follows:
1. To direct waste streams containing significant amounts
of zinc into the e.xisting 200 gpm chemical precipitation
and recovqry system.
2. Improve the quality of both the zinc sludge produced in
the recovery system and the final effluent to enable
their reuse in the manufacturing process.
3. Optimize the system.
14. Utilize the technology developed in the design, construction
and operation of a new zinc precipitation and recovery system.
IPIQJITR1ES : Coiit .t tkf. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O A ct o Re4eaICIL 4md VeveZop teitC
Fede aL Watei Pot6.t on Con.ttoe AánLaJ ’wJAon
8/68 U.S. Peptt ieatt o the in e.’v4o’i
U, L ........-.L.. U.IJ .
(Ua6h.uIgtoft, V. C. 20242
‘5-3
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThAo oku..t dac*2bed b& * ty an R 5 9 G nt aua’tded unda Sec. 6,
FedeAaL (Ua.ten, PoLtat.Lo t Cont&ot Ac.t(CLwt (& tVL Re4toM.t40n Act).
GRANTEE : C.H. Masland & Sons
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
TITLE OF PROJECT : Demonstration of a New Process for the Treatment
of Textile Dyeing and Finishing Waste
PROJECT SITE : Wakefield, Rhode IslandPATE AWARVEV : April 15, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $27,615 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $39, 450
PROJECT NUMBER : 12090 DWM PPBS NO . 1209
PESCR1PTTON OF PROJECT :
The applicant proposes to construct a pilot facility to treat the
full flow (50,000 gpd) of process and primary treated sanitary
‘wastes from their Wakefield, Rhode Island plant. The principle
operations of the plant are wool and synthetic fiber dyeing and
spinning of fibers into yarn. The Pilot Facility will employ a
process developed by the Fram Corporation (patent pending) for
the biological regeneration of an activated carbon absorption and
filtration system. In operation, the wastewaters are pumped down-
flow through several granular carbon columns in series during the
ten hour operating day. During the remainder of the day an activated
sludge mixed liquor is pumped upf low through the columns.
The plan of operation provides for (a) effluent profile analysis
(b) design, construction, operation, testing, and evaluation of the
pilot facility (c) development of design criteria for a 1 to 1.5 mgd
plant and (d) preparation of reports.
INQUiRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
Oice o Raea* k and DeveLopnnt
Fede*aZ Wa.tet Pothg.t ion Con.tiwt Aâni* aLion
U.S. Vepwvfr tt o the Inte.ti.o4
- - --I-
Waoh.iatgton, V. C. 2024?
EIJ 3/69 /54
-------
PPB 1210
LUMBER & I OD PRODUCTS
12100
Letters To PM
1320 EBG Oregon St. Univ. Schaumburg K. Willard G. Webster
WPRD
174 Kiamath Plywood Corp. K. Willard G. Webster
/65
-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR SAW MILLS & PLANNING MILLS
PPB 1210: Lumber & Wood Products
1 [
RiCOJ Virg i
Islz indsJ
nd
re Estucry
usq ehanna
June 1937
t . S -
Ptdtrjl ‘.;.• , Po c i Cc oI Ad -” .ir o
Hudson Champlal
Centrcl
-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThL &hee.t de.&c Lbe. b’t . ty an R 6 V O a.n t av. iitde.d undvL Sc e. 6,
Fdej ctIL Wa..WL Pc LLtf.on CoI’.tJLOZ Ac .t(C €xut tt’a..teii. Re. onc2’on Ae.tl.
GRA?ffEE : Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Influence of Log Rafting on Water Quality”
PROJECT SiTE : Corvallis, Oregon PATE A(’JARVEV : May 15, 1969
and Vicinity
FEVERAL GRA.’!T : $20,557 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $21,639-2nd yr.
PRO.TECT 3Et : 12100 EBG PPBS NO . 1210
(Formerly WP-1320) —____
VESCR1PUIO)I OF P2OJECT :
The major objectives of this project are to:
Determine the quantity and character of substances leached from logs
while floating in water; determine the rate and extent at which leached
substances are degraded biologically; determine debris under and in
the vicinity of log rafting and storage areas; evaluate the rate arid
extent of aerobic and anerobic biodegradation of the benthol deposits;
and determine the extent of log raft storage at selected locations in
the Pacific Northwest and using data obtained from the above experiments
evaluate the potential contribution of raft storage to water pollution
in those areas. -
1flQ IR1ES : Contae.t t4e Industrial Pollution Control Branch-DAST
OW .Ce o Re&e a’teh a.’.d V ve2opneivt
Fedeita Wa,tex Pot wtctht Co,vt tot AththtJWutt o,t
US. V n o he 1n.teA.Lo’
W4h Lñ oç 1T C. 20Z42
GRW 1 /69 i r
-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki 4heeJ. de cir2bu bL. t y a R 6 V Gx ut ai’ wuied ui’id .zi See. 6,
Fedeita.Z &c2v PoUut4o,1 Con.titot Aat(C! tn W vte.n Reo .to’wiion Aet).
GRANTEE : IClamath Plywood Corporation
P. 0. Box 1239
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97601
TiTLE OF PIWJECT :
“Aerobic Secondary Treatment of Plywood Glue Wastes”
JECT SITE : Xlamnath Falls, Oregon PATE AWARVE1 : APR 191968
FEVRAL G ANT: 42 , 028 TOTAL EST. PRO3 COST : $65,040
PROJECT ?IW 5ER : 174—O1—(R1)-68 PP8S NO . 1210
VESCR 1PTION OF PROJECT :
The project objectives of this grant are to design, constru.ct, operate
and evaluate an extended aeration, activated sludge lagoon treatment
plant on urea-formaldehyde glue wastes in order to provide data for
others to utilize in efforts to abate water pollution.
INQUiRiES : Con.tae.t .tke Industrial Po11t tion Control Branch, DED
O 1 & e o Re4cLv ck ai d Ve.ueZopnen.t
FedeAaL W ttex PcLewt ,n Contjtol Adm Jt 4$Z ti.Dn
68 U.S. Vepa.frtv ivt o the ln te .Lo/L
i: :J.... .1.i . ‘i:-. .
Wa3Ith1 ton, V. C. 20242
-------
PPB 1212
RS
12120
Letters To P M
1284 U. of Kentucky — Grieves E. Du].aney
1535 ERC Res. Fdn. - AWA—Faber W. Lacy W. Lacy
99 D OD Renoselear Pol. 7 4u]snbech ft. Keppler G. Rey
185 U. of Cincinnati — Eye E. Harris G. Webster
199 0 1K U. of Virginia — Parker H. Snyder G. Webster
WPRD
25 EFM Caldwefl Lace Leather Co. J. Westrick G. Webster
133 A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. ‘7. Thxrphy U. Webster
232 DSG S. B. Foot Tanning Co. C. Oster U. Webster
/5
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt ke,2 de etLbu bn2t Ly an R g V Gtant au&vcded undut Seg. 5,
FedeMZ (I eA PottwtLon Con.t,to Aet(Ctea.n Wa.t x Re4.to’uLt on Act).
GRANTEE : University of Kentucky
Research Foundation
Professor Robert B. Grieves
TITLE OF PROJECT : Foam Separation Flotation of Colloid Organic Systems
PROJECT SiTE : Lexington, Kentucky VATE AWARVEV : January 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : 35,174 - 2nd year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 54,6OO
PROJECT NUMBER : WP-0l284 --02 pp NO . 1212
PESCRZmON OF PROJECT : The overall objective of tb-is investigation is
the establishment of definite design criteria for specific, continuous
foam separation processes. The processes will include foam fractiona-
tion—flotation of colloidal and soluble iron from water supplies, the
ion flotation of hexavalent chromium from plating wastes, the foam
fractionation of suiphite and llgriin-containlng waste from pulp and
paper in-ills, and the ion flotation of free and complexed cyanide. The
processes will be conducted on a continuous flow basis. An economic
evaluation will be carried out and definite recommendations on the ap-
plicability of each process will be made.
iNQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
0664ce o Re4eakch. aid Veve2opi ent
RN 8/68 FedwtaL Wa.tui PoLL ut on Con.t&ot Aán it. cot on
U.S. Vepojt.bven.t o the Inten4oit
01 LJL __ .1... - - fLit. .
WaahAng.ton, V. C. 20242
/ 0
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThIA okttt dehciii.bLa b .Lt Zq an R S V (Man.t auft$cded wtdui Sec.5
FedestaL Wa.tvi. PothttLon Contxot Ac (CLwt Wa..te.’i. Re6toMtAon Act).
GRANTEE : Research Foundation, American Water Works Association.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Disposal of Wastes from Water Treatment Plants.
PROJECT SITE : New York, N. y. VATE AWARVEV : July 25, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $ i.6,3O5 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $53 25O
PROJECT NUMBER : WP- 1535—O1—69 PPBS NO . 1212
1212Q ERC
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
Preparation of a “State of the Arts” report on current practices and
costs of disposing of sludges generated by water treatment plants.
The results of this 12 month project will be used to develop a program
for research and development needs for these significant problems of
solids addition to watercourses.
INQUIRIES : Con.td t .titt Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OWJ t o Re ea*ck amd Vevelopv?eILt
8/68 FedeMZ t e’ Poliut on Conttot Ath,p ni a.t4on
U.S. Ve tweai o At In.tefl o4
IU J.JLL _ JL _ . UJJ .
WuhLitgtoii, 0. C. ZOf4t
-------
INFORMATION S}iIEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThJA hee.t deAcir2be4 btitf Ly an R S V Gnant auvi ded u.ndex See. 5
Fedc.’taL Wa..tvL PoUut2on ContILoL Aet(Ce.wi Wa.test Reô o ’coJJ.on Act).
GRANTEE : Rensselaex’ Polytechnic Institute
Research Division
Tray, New York 12181
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Removal of Syndets and Reclamation of Laundry Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Troy, New York PATE AWARVEV : January 24, 1969
FEVERAL GRMT425,055 TOTAL E.ST. PROJ. COST : $53,090
PROJECT NWA8ER : 12120 DØD P J5 NO . 1212
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
To optimize and evaluate the best process or combination of
processes attainable for the treatment and recovery of laundromat
wasterwaters. Two commercially available treatment systems for
laundromat wastewaters are to be used in the optimization and
evaluation project. The needs required to produce waste effluents
suitable for discharge to New York State receiving waters, and the
treatment requirements to produce reusable water for laundroinats
will be determined and demonstrated.
INQUIRIES : Contaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OUi. ce o Re4 eaneh aDId Vevelopnent
FedexaL Wa.tet Pollution ContitoZ AdnhinL6tlto.t.j0
U.S. Vepa4tment o At Intttio’t
U I Ii u ‘L:t. t,r. .
Wa4hington, V. C. 20242
/62
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL he .t deicnLbu btLt Ly an R S P Gtajtt aiov ded wideii. StL . 4;
FedeiiaL Wattt PoZZu.tion ConttoZ Aet(CZeLtn Wate.’t Ru2oica..tLon Aet).
GRANTEE : University of Cincinnati
Professor 3. David Eye
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Total Wastes from a Sole Leather Tannery
PROJECT SITE : Marlinton, West Virgin AWARVEV : Nay 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $29, 325 - 2nd year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $166,000
PROJECT NLIM8ER:WPD 185-02-68 pp NO . 1212
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The basic objective of this project is the com-
plete treatment of the total wastes stemming from a large sole leather
tannery. During the first yeai the beamhouse waste fractions were
effectively separated and pretreated. During the second year of this
grant the pretreated beamhouse waste will be blended with spent tan
liquor and then treated in a series of stratified anaerobic-aerobic
lagoons.
ZNQUIRIES : Cont c.t tkt 1 du.ptrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
o Reiea.n.eA a.id Vtvetopneatt
RN 6/68 F de.’taZ Watet PoULLt on Conttot AáithtA t’ i.t4on
U.S. VepwLtmeIIt o £he tvAo
I D LJL _ .L... JLIr .
(s 4Iu ng.ton, V. C. 20242
“3
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TIsLö 4hee.t de4ea2ba bt t Ly an R S V G zaiit au&vzded tutdeit S . S ,
Fed VL&L Wa.teji Pottu.tLon Conttot Ac.t(Ctean Wa. Zk Re 2onu22o ’a Act).
GRANTEE:TJniversity of Virginia
Department of Civil Engineering
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
TITLE OF PROJECT:An Anaerobic-Aerobic Lagoons for Treating Vegetable
Tannins
January 18, 1969
PROJECT SITE : Luray, Virginia PATE AWARVEP: - - — , L
FEVERAL GRANT : $17,801 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,500
PROJECT NUMBER : 12120 DIK PPBS NO . 1212
VESCRIPT1ON OF PROJECT: e objective of this project is to demonstrate
that thewastes from the bating, soaking, tanning, and bleaching
processes in a vegetable tannery can be effectively treated by means
of an anaerobic-aerobic lagoon. The wastes are to be equalized and
combined prior to entering the lagoon. The lagoon is to be operated
under varying conditions of aeration arid BOD loading in order to
determine optimum design parameters.
ZNQUTR!ES : COIIt4C.t tlit Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OUix e o Re4e.a1 k aad VeveLopneii.t
FedeML Wa te4 PoLtut4Dn Cont’tot Ad,iij,.LUi atJ on
U.S. Dep 4b,en.t o the Isite4 oft
111 Iitdiniiu L rii’
WahhhigtoPI, P. C. 2024!
“4
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThU a&eet de4e beA bnit Ly an R g P G t t w 4ed unde* See. 6,
Fedt4&iZ Wa.tejg. PoUwtLoit Con.titoe A(!t(a Wa ttn Re ton&tLon Act).
GRANTEE : Caidwell Lace Leather Company
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Complete Treatment of Tannery Industrial Waste for
Chrome Tanning, Alum Tanning, and Vegetable Tanning”
PROJECT NUMBER : WPHD 25-01-67 PPBS NO . 1212
12120 EFM
VESCR1PTTON OF PROJECT : No completely satisfactory method has been de-
vised for treating tannery industrial waste. Since tanneries use large
volumes of water, containing organic and inorganic matter, suitable treat-
ment methcds must be found.
The objectives of the project are to demonstrate the feasibility of com-
pletely treating tannery waste from the only plant in U.S. that tans all
three types of leather tannages - Chrome, Vegetable and Alum - and to
obtain basic data to design full-scale treatment plants usable for any
tannery.
The basic plan is to develop methods to pre-treat the
tannages, to combine their streams, and to completely
trial waste. The high alkaline content of beam house
tralized with high acid made up of various tannages.
will be reduced in an anaerobic-aerobic lagoon.
_________ Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
o Ru ea&ck aad Vevelopnent
FedeJLdL Wa.tex Poliu.t4on Contjtot AthnàtU &tiøn
U.S. Depa*.t,,e* t o At 1n en.4ok
NI I.. _ .. _ .1. _ . u.i .
W.6hA.ngto I, V. C. 20242
FEVERAL GRANT : $46,340
PROJECT SITE : Auburn, Kentucky VATE ALUARVEV : December, 1966
TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST :
$68,200
three present leather
treat tannery indus-
waste will be neu-
The organic solids
INQUIRIES : Co*tact the
GW 1/67
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo ha.t de cj 2bu bn4*gzy ait R P G’ U &wi 4t’ d w dtV. See. 6,
Fede*aZ Wate’t PoZ&tt o* COPItJLOZ 4e.t(CLw W .teii. R o’t&tiiwi Ae.t).
GRANTEE : A.C. Lawrence Leather Company, Division of Swift &
Company, 10-18 Sawyer Street
Peabody, Massachusetts
TITLE OF PROJECT:”wastewater Treatment Pilot Plant Investigation,
Mixed throme Tannery Wastewater”
PROJECT SITE : South Paris, Maine PATE I WMVEV : 8/30/67
FEVERAL GRANT:$8 7 , 2 1 5 TOTAL ESTO PROJ. COST : $124,593
PROJECT IUM8ER : WPRD-133-01-68 PPBS NO . 1212
PESCR?PTTON OF PROJECT : The objectives of .thepi oject are as follows:
1) To demonstrate on a pilot plant scale the primary and
secondary treatment, by the activated sludge process,
of mixed chrome tannery wastewaters arid sanitary sewage.
2) To demonstrate thepre-treatment of the tannery wastewater
by carbonation with flue-gas and up-flow sedimentation in
order to remove excess calcium, chromium, and sulfides.
3) To demonstrate the benefits of mixing municipal sanitary
sewage with tannery wastewaters to provide the biological
nutrientS lacking in tannery wastes.
4) To determine design criteria for a scale up to a full
scale demonstration plant and to provide a basis for
estimating he costs of construction and operation of a
full scale plant.
5) To determine optimum methods of dewatering sludge, with
primary emphasis on concentration by centrifugation, with
aim being to dewater sufficiently to dispose of solids as
sanitary land fi].1.
ZNQJJIRZES : Co Itdet thq . Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i2e o Re z k d
Fede’u&L tiJ j . Po .e z &tiooa Co itto Athrbi v&tLo.i
(1.5. o th I e 4o
/
o 10,68 . .
1
-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL& &heet dc ocjcibe 4 s bn. Lt6ty an R g V Gna,tt aL1wLd d w1d jt S . 6,
Fedutal Wa.teJL Pollwaon Contn oL Ac2(Ct &n Wa.Wi Re4 o’LoZiDn Ac.tJ
GRANTEE : S. B. ?oot Tanning Company
Red Wing, Minnesota
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Aerobic Biological Treatment, Sludge Dewatering
and Disposal. and Effluent Reuse for a Side Leather
Tannery”
PROJECT SiTE : Red Wing, Minnesota PATE AWARVEV : May 15, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $475,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2,046,268
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 232 PP(S NO . ].212
12120 DSG
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT :
The four year proj eat will provide a full scale demonstration and
investigation of primary sedimentation, biological secondary treatment
utilizing aerated lagoons, and primary and secondary sludge dewatering
and disposal by means of pressure filtration and incineration. The
system will treat the total waste flow of 2.1 MGD from the side leather
tannery. In addition an evaluation will be conducted to determine
the influence of fina], treatment plant effluent reuse on hide processing
and qukll ty of the finished product by reusing it in the “limepaddle”
and “wash soak” t r’lng operations.
INQUiRiES : Conta.c..t M INDuSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH, DED
- O L e o Reoea’tch aaid Veve.Lopnen.t
FedeML Wa te’t PoFluti.on Con.t’v.oL AthninU.’tat oii
Bio8 U.S. Vepa.n.frncat.t o the i.t en4oa.
I L! .1. __ .. !LLf .
Wa.ih.tsg.tot’t, V. C. 20242
“7
------- |