U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
L7\KE K/YFESKA
COUNTY
EPA REGION VIII
WORKING PAPER No, 611
CORV ALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•'.-'..!•.<>. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE KMPESKft
CQDIPRON COUN1Y
SOUTH DAKOTA
EPA REGION VIII
WORKING PAPER No, 611
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AND THE
SOUTH DAKOTA NATIONAL GUARD
JANUARY/ 1977
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreward ii
List of South Dakota Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions i
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 1
III. Lake Water Quality Sumary 3
IV. Nutrient Loadings 4
V. Literature Reviewed 8
VI. Appendices 9
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration cormiiitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point—source discharge reduction and non—point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific Information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)J, water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring I 1O6 and §305(b)) activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Dakota Departments of
Environmental Protection and Game, Fish and Parks for professional
involvement, to the South Dakota National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to those wastewater
treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent samples.
Allyn Lockner, Secretary, and Blame Barker and Duane Murphy,
Department of Environmental Quality; Douglas Hansen, Department
of Game, Fish and Parks; and James Hayden, Director, State Lakes
Preservation Committee provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Duane L. Corning, the Adjutant General of South
Dakota, and Project Officer Colonel Robert D. Chalberg, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the South Dakota National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
lv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Albert Kingsbury
Alvin Lincoln
Angostura Fall River
Brant Lake
Byron Beadle
Clear Marshall
Clear Minnehaha
Cochrane Deuel
Cottonwood Spink
Deerfield Perinington
Enemy Swim Day
Herman Lake
John Haml in
Kampeska Codi ngton
Madison Lake
Mitchell Davidson
Norden Hamlin
East Oakwood Brookings
West Oakwood Brookings
Pactola Pennington
Pickerel Day
Poinsett Brookings, Lake
Red Iron South Marshall
Richmond Brown
Roy Marshall
Sand Brown
Sheridan Pennington
Stockdale Custer
East Vermillion McCook
Wall Minnehaha
Waubay Day
-------
V
LAKE KAMPESKA
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
/
I
7
s Smith
Lake
Map
Location
9715
-------
LAKE KAMPESKA
STORET NO. 4614
I. INTRODUCTION
Due to lack of flows, only a few tributary and outlet samples were
taken; therefore, this report relates only to the lake sampling data.
However, the few sampling data obtained are included in Appendix D for
the record.
IL CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Lake Kampeska is eutrophic. It
ranked fourteenth in overall trophic quality when the 31 South
Dakota lakes sampled in 1974 were compared using a combination
of six lake parameters*. Twenty of the lakes had less median
total phosphorus, ten had less and one had the same median inor-
ganic nitrogen, 24 had less median dissolved orthophosphorus,
13 had less mean chlorophyll a, and 18 had greater mean Secchi
di sc transparency.
Survey limnologists observed blooms of filamentous algae at
all three sampling stations in July and September. Blue-green
algal blooms are reported to occur every suniner (Smith, 1968).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Lake Kampeska was nitro-
gen limited when the assay samples were collected (04/25/74 and
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
09/19/74).
The lake data indicate nitrogen limitation at all three
sampling times.
-------
3
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICSt
A. Lake Morphometrytt:
1. Surface area: 19.43 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 3.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 5.5 meters.
4. Volume: 66.062 x 106 m 3 .
B. Precipitation*:
1. Year of sampling: 41.2 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 55.4 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions--Appendix B.
tt Murphey, 1974.
* See Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods, 1973—1976”.
-------
4
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Kampeska was sampled three times during the open-water season of
1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples
for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two or more
depths at three stations on the lake (see map, page v). During each visit,
a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample was corn-
posited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration;
and during the first and last visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated
sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated
sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 3.0 meters at station 1, 2.4 meters at
station 2, and 2.4 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix C and are sum-
marized in the following table.
-------
RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
A.
SI)M’APf
OF
-4v5 [ CAL A’ML) C-$EMICAL
A- CT&1STICS
FOP?
LA )P E r AMPE5,CA
SEu tT
CUDE +614
1ST
5AMPLI JG 4/25/74 1
2ND SAMi ’LING C 7/12/74) 3RD SAMPLING C 9/19/741
3 SITES 3 SITES 3 SITES
r AN
PA M1T
MEAN
MEL)IAN
MANGE
MEA 4
MEDIAN
TEMP IC)
9.0
— 10.0 9.5 9.3
24.4
— 25.3
24.
24.8
15.5
— 16.3
15.9
15.8
DISS t iM (Mt/L)
10.2
— 10.6 10.1 10.2
6.8
— 8.0
7.3
7.4
8.4
— 9.4
9.0
9.1
CNDCTV (MC,. ti’ IO)
343.
— 352. 34 . 346.
S9’ .
— 617.
612.
615.
413.
— 421.
411.
417.
Ph cSTAND UMITS
8.7
— 8.9
8.8
d.8
8.6
— 8.d
.7
8.7
TOT ALK (MG/LI
11 (2.
— 200. j94 , 195.
202.
— 2413.
228.
228.
260.
— 300.
278.
276.
TOT P (MG/L.)
u.20d
— 0.262 0.242 0.244
0.131
— 0.29’.
0.175
0.162
0.207
— u.237
0.223
0.224
ORT 4O P (MG/ I)
0.130
— 0.?17 0.195 0.206
0.084
— 0.117
0.102
0.109
0.125
— 0.156
0.13d
0.137
N02’N03 (MG/LI
0.040
— 0.I1 ) 0.O6Fi 0.0t S
0.040
— 0.070
.057
0.060
0.0i0
— 0.040
0.035
0.035
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.040
— 0.150 0.060 0.040
0.040
— 0.070
0.055
0.055
0.050
— 0.070
0.060
0.060
KJEL M (Mu/LI
0.500
— 0.700 0.600 0.600
0.600
— 1.600
1.112
1.050
1.100
— 1.800
1.400
1.400
i; iOPG N (Mc,/jI
0. Oi0
— 0.260 0.I2, 0.105
0.0 0
— 0.1 O
0.1i2
0.110
0.030
— 0.110
0.095
0.095
TOTAL i (M’ /LI
0.540
— 0.760 O.66 i 0.690
0.640
— 1.660
1.170
1.110
1.140
— 1.640
1.435
1.430
CfriLP t.. A (LI’./LI
5.7
— 6.7 6.1 5.9
5.0
— 62.0
29.4
20.5
12.6
— 40.3
26.2
19.8
cCC’1l (METC,dSI
0.6
— 0.8 0.7 0.7
0.6
— 0.9
0.d
0.8
0.6
— 1.1
0.9
0.9
U,
-------
6
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Pkiytoplankton —
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
04/25/74 1. Cyclotella s . 531
2. Dinobryon sp . 163
3. Fragilaria sp . 163
4. Chroomonas sp . 163
5. Synedra sp . 123
Other genera 83
Total 1,226
07/12/74 1. Aphanizomenon sp . 2,436
2. Microcystis sp . 635
3. Schroederia !P• 477
4. Chroomonas sp . 424
5. Phormidium s _ p . 212
Other genera 741
Total 4,925
09/19/74 1. Aphanizomenon sp . 6,830
2. Chroomonas sp . 187
3. Schroederia sp . 149
4. Microcystis sp. 37
Total 7,203
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/ I )
04/25/74 1 5.9
2 5.7
3 6.7
07/12/74 1 20.5
2 62.5
3 5.0
09/19/74 1 12.6
2 19.8
3 46.3
-------
7
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autociaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. April sample -
Spike (mg/fl
Control
0.050 p
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.040
0.090
0.090
0.040
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.158
0.158
I . 158
1 .158
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
7.7
7.4
35.8
33.8
b. September sample -
Spike (mg/1
Control
o.oso p
0.050 p + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.075
0.125
0.125
0.075
inorganic N
onc. (mg/i )
0.131
0. 1 31
1.131
1.131
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
11.4
12.1
33.8
32. 7
-------
8
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Hales, Donald C, and Richard L. Applegate, 1973. Nutrient sources
and transport in the upper and central regions of the Big Sioux
River. Compl. Rept. Proj. A-029-SDAK, Water Res. Inst., SD St.
U., Brookings.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul 0. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser. Proj. 16010
EHR, Wash., DC.
Murphey, Duane 6., 1974. Personal coniTiunication (lake morphometry).
SD Dept. of Env. Prot., Pierre.
Smith, Gary B., 1968. The total organic matter of a shallow, eutro-
phic, prairie lake. MA thesis, Dept. of Zoology, U. of SD,
Vermillion.
-------
9
V I. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
DATA TO t U tU iN .‘ANt i 1
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— -MEAN 15— MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P IWO . G N MEAN SEC - CHLORA MIN DO DISS ORTP40 I
‘.601 LA cE ALBERT 0.321 3.170 489.111 Lo.289 9.200 0.O 9
4602 ALVIN LME 0.067 0.970 442.833 4.700 9.400 0.017
4603 ANGOSTJRA RESERVOIR 0.019 0.160 423.333 3.717 13.000 0.005
4604 B ANT LAKE 0.194 0.130 432.833 34.150 11.800 0.113
4605 LAKE ByRON Q,443 0,370 488.333 149.350 9.000 0.146
4606 CLEAR LAKE 0.027 11.075 430.167 11.983 8.800 0.009
4607 CLEAR LAKE 1.400 0.270 495.333 691.000 7.000 0.468
4608 COCI -4RANE LAKE 0.037 0.150 446.000 15.683 15.000 0.008
4609 COTTONWOOD LAKE 0.685 0.265 490.333 112.017 8.600 0.417
4610 CEERFIELD RESERVOIR 0.033 0.080 303.333 3.650 15.000 0.022
‘.611 ENEMY SWIM LAKE 0.037 0.085 442.600 14.200 8.200 0.013
4612 LAKE HEPMAN 0,340 0.155 485.000 58.733 8.600 0.174
4613 ST JOMN LAKE 0.34S 0.080 489.400 120.880 9.800 0.025
4614 LAKE KAMPESKA 0.220 0.105 468.889 20.567 8.200 0.128
4615 MADISON LAKE 0.253 0.090 445.555 22.578 14.000 0.107
4616 LAKE MITChELL 0.099 0.085 465.833 14.883 13.800 0.015
‘.617 LAKE NflRDEN 0.256 0.165 488.667 46.800 10.000 0.050
‘.618 OAK iOOI) LAKE EAST 0.146 0.175 487.000 113.600 10.000 0.009
4619 OAKu OOO LAKE WEST 0.181 0.135 485.833 159.667 9.600 0.021
4620 PACTOLA RESERVOIR 0.011 0.070 248.444 1.478 11.000 0.OOb
4621 P1CIcE EL LAKE 3 ,049 0,095 439.833 15.833 9.600 0.009
4622 LAKE POINSETT 0.115 0.315 468.444 40.211 10.000 0.023
4623 LAKE RED I l0N SOUTM 0.042 0.110 430.333 6.88) 7.600 0.010
4624 RICMH0 O LAKE 0.187 0.150 410.000 18.467 10.000 0.144
4625 PQY LAKE 0.03’. 0.070 ‘+31.000 13.333 11.000 0.010
4626 SAND LAKE 0.489 0.110 471.800 65.790 12.800 0.288
4627 SHERIDAN LAKE 0.053 0.105 394.000 15.433 15.000 0.016
4628 STOCKADE LAKE 0.233 0.150 432.000 25.400 15.000 0.109
-------
LAKE NAME
LME V!RM1LL1O 4 0.211
WALL LAKE 0.194
WAUBAY LAIcE NORTH 0.093
LAKE DATA To BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
4629
4630
4631
MEDIAN MEOIAN
TOTAL P INORb N
0.100
0.160
0.145
500—
MEAN SEC
472.833
44 1. 667
469 • 555
MEAN
CHLOI4A
100.800
55.267
121. 033
1 5 MEDIAN
MIN DO DISS O THO P
9.200 0.092
7.400 0.076
11.400 0.023
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITw HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
‘MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
500—
INORG N MEAN SEC
MEAN
C 1ILORA
15-
MIN DO
MEDIAN
INDEX
LME
COOE
LAKE NAME
0155 ORT i0 P
NO
46 1
LAKE ALBERT
20 C 6)
20 C 6)
10 C 3)
23 C fl
68
C 20)
60 C 18)
201
4602
ALVIN LAKE
67 C 20)
0 C 0)
57 ( 17)
90 C 27)
63
C 19)
63 C 19)
340
‘603
ANGOSTURA RESERVOIR
97 C 29)
30 C 9)
81 C 26)
93 ( 28)
20
C 6)
100 i 30)
427
4606
BRANT LAKE
40 C 12)
53 C 161
70 C 21)
41 C 14)
27
C 8)
23 C 7)
260
4605
LAKEBYPON
10(3)
3(1)
17(5)
1(2)
73(22)
13 (4)
123
4606
CLEAR LAKE
93 C 28)
93 C 26)
83 C 25)
83 C 25)
77
C 23)
90
1 27)
5L
4607
CL.EARLAKE
0(0)
10(3)
0(0)
OCO)
100(30)
0(0)
110
4638
COCHRANE LAKE
83 C 25)
40 C 11)
50 C 15)
bi C 20)
5
C 0)
93 C 28)
338
4609
COTTOr4W000 LAKE
3 1)
13 C 4)
3 C 1)
20 C 6)
82
C 24)
3 C 1)
124
4610
DEERrIELD RESERVOIR
90 C 27)
88 C 26)
97 C 29)
97 ( 29)
5
C 0)
53
1 16)
430
4611
ENEMY SWIM LA IcE
80 C 24)
82 1 24)
60 C Id)
77 C 23)
88
C 26)
73 1 22)
460
4612
LAKE HERMAN
17 1 5)
33 1 10)
27 C 8)
33 C 10)
82
C 24)
10 1 3)
202
4613
ST JOHN LAKE
13 C 4)
88 1 26)
7 C 2)
13 C 4)
53
C 16)
43 ( 13)
217
4614
LAKE KAMPESKA
33 C 10)
65 C 19)
40 C 12)
57 C 17)
88
Cr26)
20
C 6)
303
‘615
MADISON LAKE
27 4 81
77 23)
53 C 16)
53 C 16)
13
C 4)
30 C 9)
253
4616
LAKE MITCMELL
60 1 18)
82 C 24)
47 C 14)
73 C 22)
17
( 5)
‘70 C 21)
349
4617
LAKE NOKDEP4
23 C 7)
23 C 7)
13 C 4)
40 C 12)
45
1 12)
40 C 12)
184
4618
OAKW000 LAKE EAST
53 C 16)
17
C 5)
20 C 6)
17 C 51
45
C 12)
85 C 25)
237
4619
OAKW000 LAKE WEST
SO C 15)
50 C 15)
23 £ 7)
3 C 1)
58
4 11)
57 C 17)
241
4620
PACTOLA RESERVOIR
100 C 30)
98 29)
100 C 30)
100 C 30)
35
C 10)
97 C 29)
530
4621
PICKEREL LAKE
73 C 22)
73 C 22)
67 C 20)
63 (
58
11)
85
C 25)
419
4622
LAKE POINSETT
57 C 17)
7 C 2)
43 C 13)
43 C 13)
45
12)
47 C 14)
2 2
4623
LAKE RED IRON SOUTH
77 C 23)
58 1 17)
80 C 24)
87 C 26)
93
1 28)
78 C 23)
413
‘624
RICHMOND LAKE
47 C 14)
40
C 11)
90 C 27)
60 18)
45
C 12)
17 ( 5)
299
4625
ROY LAKE
87
C 26)
98
C 29)
77 C - 23)
80 C. 24)
35
C 10)
78 1 23)
455
4626
SAND LAcE
7 C 2)
58
C 17)
33 C 10)
30 C 9)
23
C 7)
7 1 2)
158
4621
SHERIDAN LAKE
70 C 21)
65
C 19)
93 C 28)
70 C 21)
5’
C 0)
67 C 20)
370
4628
STOCKADE LAKE
30 C 9)
40 C 11)
13 C fl)
c
‘ 0’
27
1
‘25
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES •ITM IIIGMER VALUES (NUM3ER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER ALU S>
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEX
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INOQG N MEAN SEC CHLOi A MIN DO DISS ORTrIO P NO
4629 LAKE VERHILLION 37 1 11) 70 C 21) 30 C 9) 27 C 8) 68 ( 20) 33 C 10) 265
4630 WALL LAKE 43 C 13) 27 C 8) 63 C 19) 37 11) 97 ( 29) 37 C 11) 304
4631 WAUbAY LAi’ E NORTH 63 ( 19) 47 C 14) 37 C 11) 10 C 3) 30 C 9) 50 C 15) 237
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4620 PACTOLA RESERVOIR 530
2 4606 CLEAR LAKE 519
3 4623 LAKE RED IRON SOUTH 473
4 4611 ENEMY SWIM LAKE 460
5 4625 ROY LAKE 455
6 4610 DEERFIELD RESERVOIR 430
7 4603 ANGOSTURA RESERVOIR 427
8 6621 PICKEREL LAKE 419
9 4627 SHERIDAN LAKE 370
10 4616 LAKE MITCHELL 349
11 4602 ALVIN LAKE 340
12 4608 COCHRANE LAKE 338
13 4630 WALL LAKE 304
14 6614 LAKE KAMPESKA 303
15 4624 RICPIMOND LAKE 299
16 4629 LAKE VERMILLION 265
17 4604 BRANT LAKE 260
18 6b15 MADISON LAKE 253
19 4622 LAPSE POINSEIT 242
20 4619 OAKW000 LAKE WEST 241
21 4631 WAU8AY LAKE NORTH 237
22 4618 OAK OOD LAi(E EAST 237
23 4628 STOCKADE LAKE 225
24 4613 ST JOHN LAKE 211
25 4612 LAKE HERMAN 202
26 4601 LAKE ALBERT 201
27 4617 LAPSE NORDEN 184
28 4626 SAND LAKE 158
-------
LA(ES RANPcEO BY DiOE OS.
R#NK LAKE CODE LA ¼E 1AME INDEX NO
29 4609 COTTuNWOO LAI E 124
30 4605 LAKE bYPON 123
31 4607 CLEAR LAKE 110
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FA(;TORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
461401
44 54 36.0 097 14 02.0 3
LAKE KAMP. KA
4602S SOUTH DAKOTA
090791
1 1EPALES
0012 FEET DEPTH
2111202
CLASS 00
74/04/25 11 00 0000
11 00 0008
74/07/12 11 15 0000
11 15 0005
11 15 0010
74/09/19 10 10 0000
10 10 0001
10 10 0004
10 10 0006
10 10 0008
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.233
0 • 208
0.294
0.174
0.162
0.216
00031
INCDT LI
REPINING
PERCENT
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY FEET
74/04/25
11 00 0000
11 00 0008
74/07/12
11 15 0000
11 15 0005
ii 15 0010
74/09/19
10 10 0000
10 10 0008
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY FEET
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TR4NSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T ALIc
NP13—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOSL)IS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROHH )
SU
MG/L
MG/L
MG/I
MG/L
MG/L P
10.0
32
352
182
0.040
0.700
0.060
0.207
9.3
10.2
347
194
0.150
0.600
0.110
0.130
25.3
8.0
24
617
8.90
234
0.070
1.400
0.070
0.110
25.1
7.2
615
8.90
246
0.060
1.000
0.070
0.111
25.0
7.2
616
8.80
248
0.050
0.600
0.040
0.117
15.8
9.2
42
417
8.b l
300
0.060
1.100
0.040
0.156
15.8
9.0
416
8.57
276
0.050
1.100
0.040
0.132
5.9
20 • 5
12.6
50.0
5.0
1.0
0.207
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
461402
44 55 34.1 097 12 40.0 3
LAKE KAMPESKA
46029 SOUTH DAKOTA
090791
I IEPALES 2111202
0012 FEET DEPTM CL.ASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTh t ATER DO TRANSP CNDLJCTVY Ph T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PpiOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FiELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES HICRONHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L M(,/L MG/L P
74/04/25 11 15 0000 10.0 28 346 190 0.040 0.600 0.070 0.211
11 15 0008 9.1 10.2 345 200 0.040 0.500 0.040 0.205
74/07/12 11 00 0000 24.9 7,4 33 599 8.90 234 0.060 1.500 0.060 0.086
11 00 0006 24.6 7.4 599 8.80 222 0.060 1.100 0.050 0.091
74/09/19 10 30 0000 15.5 9.2 36 413 8.73 274 0.060 1.400 0.030 0.148
10 30 0007 15.5 9.4 415 8.75 276 0.050 1.400 0.030 0.142
00665 32217 00031
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
FROM OF A REMNING
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
74/04/25 11 15 0000 0.259 5.7
11 15 0008 0.243
74/07/12 11 00 0000 0.177 62.6
ii 00 0006 0.144
74 / 0 9/ 1 Q 10 30 0000 0.224 19.8
10 30 0001 50.0
10 30 0003 5.0
10 30 0005 1.0
10 30 0007 0.224
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
461403
44 56 25.0 097 11 03.0 3
LAKE KAMPL.KA
46029 SOUTH DAKOTA
090 7 1
1 1EPALES 2111202
0010 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00 . 1Q 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIP4E DEPTH WATER DO TR NSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PriOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCMI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT IG/L INcHES MICROMIIO SU MG/I MG/L MG/I MG/I MG/L P
74/04/25 11 30 0000 9.3 25 345 200 0.040 0.700 0.060 0.217
11 30 0005 9.0 10.6 343 196 0.050 0.500 0.070 0.198
74/07/12 10 45 0000 24.5 7.4 36 617 8.80 202 0.050 1.600 0.060 0.110
10 45 0005 24.4 7.4 615 8.80 220 0.040 1.000 0.050 0.109
10 45 0008 24.4 6.8 615 8.70 220 0.050 0.700 0.060 0.084
74/09/19 10 45 0000 16.3 8.4 24 421 8.71 284 0.070 1.800 0.040 0.127
10 45 0007 16.3 9.0 421 8.73 260 0.070 1.600 0.030 0.125
00665 32217 00031
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
FROM OF A REMNING
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
74/04/25 11 30 0000 0.262 6.7
11 30 0005 0.245
74/07/12 10 45 0000 0.162 5.0
10 45 0005 0.153
10 45 0008 0.137
74/09/19 10 45 0000 0.237 46.3
10 45 0007 0.231
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
461 4A 1
44 56 40.0 )97 10 30.0 4
UNNAMED STREAM
46 7.5 wATERTOwN W
O /KAMPES,cA LAr(E 090791
SD riwY 20 i RC 3 AT NE END OF KAIIPESKA LK
1 1EPALES 2111204
000i) FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL (JRTHO
13 DAY FEET MG/L MG/L M(,/L MG/L P MG/L P
74/11/06 08 00 0.064 hbOO 0.063 0.015 0.080
14/12/04 15 00 0.0’H 1.600 0.085 0.010 0.080
75/05/30 17 35 0.005 2.500 0.030 0.130
75/08/30 10 00 0.100 1.850 0.050 0.095 0.180
75/07/17 11 30 0.095 1.900 0.085 0.150 u.22 0
-------
sTORE r RETRIEVAL DATE 76/G5/04
4614b1
44 51 05.G 19? 12 30.0 4
UNNAMED ST, EAM
46 1.5 WATERTOwN w
T/KAMPESKA LAKE 090791
SO HmY 23 dP OG AT N END or KAMPESKA LAKE
1 IEPALES 2 111t ,4
0000 FEET O€PTr( CLASS GO
00630 00625 00610 00611 00665
DATE TIME OEPTrI N02&N03 TOT icJ (L Nr13—N PnOSDIS Pi tOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL 14 TOTAL ORTv IO
10 JAY FEET MG/C MG/C MG/C MG/C P MG/C P
1S/ub/23 13 30 G .735 1.300 5.200 2.600 3 ,000
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOw INFORMATION FOR SOUTH DAKOTA
05/03/76
LA’CE CODE 4614 KAP4PESKA
TOTAL DP4I AGE AREA OF LAKE(SO cM)
SUR-DRAINAGE
APEA(S0 KM)
4662.0
51.8
JAW
0.0
0.0
APR
0.0
0.057
NORMALIZED
LOWS(CMS)
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.057
0.028
0.028
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.014
SUMMARY
TR1’ JTARY
4614A1
4614ZZ
MEAN MONThLY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTh YEAR
46I .A1 10 74
11 74
12 74
1 75
2 75
3 75
4 75
5 75
6 75
7 75
8 75
9 75
4614ZZ 10 7’.
ii 74
12 74
1 75
2 75
3 75
4 75
5 75
6 75
7 75
8 75
9 75
4662.0
TOTAL
FLOW
IN
=
0.17
51.8
TOTAL
FLOW
OUT
0.0
DAY FLOW DAY
FLOW
4db62.Q
FEB MAR
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS =
AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW
0.0 12 0.0
0.0 2 0.006
0.0 4 0.003
0.0 25 0.0
0.0 24 0.0
0.0 2 0.0
0.0 6 1.416
0.0 30 1.133
0.0 30 0.142
0.0 17 0.085
0.0 29 0.142
0.0 30 0.057
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
7
23
0.006
0.003
0.283
------- |