>>EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER: 9370.0-1
TITLE: Preliminary FY 87 SEWS Targets
APPROVAL DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORIGINATING OFFICE:
August 15, 1986
August 15, 1986
OSWER / OERR and CWPE
D DRAFT
STATUS:
REFERENCE (other documents):
OS WER OS WER OS WER
'E DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE Dl
-------
United States Environmental Protection Agency Interim Directive Number
Washington. DC 20460
EPA OSWER Directive Initiation Recwest 9370.0-1
Originator Information
Name of Contact Person
Terry Ouverson
Mail Code Telephone Number
WH-548 475-9330
Lead Office 0
q
D . OERR 0 OWPE
0 OSW 0 A•0SWER
Approved for Review
Signature of Office Director Date
Title
Preliminary FY 87 SPMS Targets
Summary of Directive
Se ts Superfund SPMS targets for FY 87. Because of the uncertainties of
reauthorization, asks for targets only for certain key measures, primarily
those which relate to the project completions.
Signed Henry L. Longest II, Director, Office of Em rgency and Remedial Response
and Gene A. Lucero, Director, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement
Type of Directive (Manual. Policy Directive. Announcement. etc.)
Does this Directive Supersede Pravio4 Directive(s)?
If “Yes to Either Question. What Directive (number, title)
Review Plan
“0 AA-OSWER 0 OUST 0 OECM 0 Other(Specily)
0 OERR 0 OWPE 0
O osw 0 Regions 0 OPPE
This Request Meets OSWER Directives System Format
Signature of d- Ce Directives ificer
Signa(ure of OSWER Directives icer
Oat
/ii
Date
EPA Form 1315.17(10.85)
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D C 20460
OFFICE OF
SOL'O WA3TE AXO SMEaGENiC / PSSFC'VSE
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0-1
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Preliminary FY 87 SPMS Targets
FROM: Henry L. Longest II, Director
Office of Emergency and Remedia/3Tl$£sponse
Gene A. Lucero, Director _
Office of Waste Programs Enforcemen
TO: Addressees
The time has come to set Superfund SPMS targets for FY 87.
Because of the uncertainties of reauthorization, we are asking
for targets only for certain key measures, primarily those which
relate to project completions.
o PA Completions (S/F-1)
o SI Completions (S/F-2)
o NPL First Removal Starts (S/C-3)
o NPL Removal Stabilizations (S/C-4)
o First and Subsequent ROD/EDO (S/C-6 (a) & (b))
o Sites where all Remedial Implementation has been
completed (S/C-8)
o Section 107 Cost Recovery Referrals to Headquarters
(S/E-2a) .
Proposed targets for all these measures and candidate site
names for ROD/EDO (S/C-6) and Remedial Implementation completion
(S/C-8) are attached. The targets were developed using the SCAP
Targeting Methodologies which were sent to you last June.
Please review the targets and candidate sites. If you want
to propose any changes you must notify Terry Ouverson in writing
by August 22. His E-MAIL number is EPA5421. The attached SPMS
targets assume that reauthorization will occur in time to resume
all activities at the start of the first quarter of FY 1987
(October 1, 1986). You should use this assumption in developing
your FY 1987 plans. In addition to this assumption, the following
guidance should be used in developing your projections:
-------
—2— OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0—1
Expanded site inspections will not be an SPMS commitment in
F l 87-nor are they included in the SI (S/F—2) target.
o CERCLA reauthorization will probably bring about some signifi-
cant changes in the way Superfund performs remedial rasponse
actions, particularly remedial investigations/feasibility
studies ( I/FS). When determining which sites will be ready
for Record of Decision (ROD) signature during FY 87, be aware
that the new cleanup standard provisions will require reassessLng
ongoing RI/F3 projects and could lengthen the RI/FS process,
by as much as two quarters. New or expanded requirements,
such as (1) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) h alt.h assessrients of every site on and proposed for
the NFL; (2) greater emphasis on evaluating permanent solutions
and alternative technologies and resource recovery technologies;
and (3) the inclusion of State standards, requirements, criteria
or limitations as legally applicable or relevant and appropriate
standards, will need to be incorporated into the Rt/FS process.
o Sites where all remedial implementation will be completed in
Fl 1987 (S/C—8) are not expected to be affected by reauthori-
zation. The national target of 12 is based on currently
ongoing projects.
o For NFL Removal First Starts, it is assumed that there will be
one PRP first racnoval in each Region; Fund removals are based
on performing 30 removals under ERCS or other ERD contracts
and 15 expedited response actions (ERAs) by REM under removal
authority. Regions should review potential first removal
action candidate sites and determine which will be addressed
as removals performed through ERCS or through ERAs via the REI
contract.
o As was state’i in the SCAP Targeting Methodologies, targets for
Removal Stabilizations (S/C—4) will be set only after the Region
provides a projection of completions. Generally, this target
should he slightly less than the number of NFL First Removal
Starts plus ongoing NPL removals as of October 1, 1986. Regions
must provide this target in their submission to Headquarters.
If we find aEter reauthorization that the resource levels are
inadequate to meet your targets, you will have an opportunitiy
to revise them.
Should you have any questions, please contact Terry Ouverson
at FTS 475—9367.
At t a C hrne n t S
-------
OSWER DIRECTIvE 9370.0-1
—3—
Addressees :
Directors, Waste Management Division
Regions I, IV, V, VII, VIII
Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Region II
Directors, Air and Waste Management Division,
Regions II arid VI
Director, Hazarcous Waste Management Division,
Region III
Director, Toxics and Waste Management Division,
Region IX
Directors, Environmental Services Division,
Regions I — X
cc: Superfund Branch Chiefs, Regions I — X
RCRA/CERCLA 3ranch Chiefs, Regions I — X
Regional Counsels, Regions I — X
Director, Resource Management Staff, OSWER
-------
ATTACHMENT 1
PRELIMINARY FY 1987 SPMS ANNUAL TARGETS
_____ _____ _____ _____ REGION _____ ______ _____ _____
I II III IV V VI VIE VIII IX X TOTAL
*S/F_1: Preliminary
Assessments 242 598 757 522 964 187 197 133 549 201 4350
— Federal. Facilities 37 13 20 61 21 22 24 16 60 76 350
— Non—Federal Facitlitles 205 585 737 461 943 165 173 117 4139 125 4000
*S/F_2: Site Inspections 63 114 130 179 217 106 67 34 96 39 1035
*S/C_3:First Removal Starts
At NPL Sites 55
—PRP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
— ERAs** TAD TAD TAD TUD TBD TAD TAI) TUF) TAt) ‘IBl) 15
— Fund—Financed 1 6 4 3 9 1 1 1 3 1 30
*S/C_4: NPL Sites
Stabilized** TAD TBD TAD TAD TAD TAD TAD TAD TAD TAD TBD
*S/C.....6: Remedies Selected
* — First ROD/EDD
Fund 2 18 6 6 6 4 6 2 1 3 54
Enforcement/PRP 2 17 2 11 10 7 4 3 0 0 56
* — Subsequent ROI)/ED1)
Fund 1 4 1 0 2 4 2 1 1 0 16
Enforcement/PRP 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
*S/C_8: Remedial Implemen-
tation Completed
— Fund Financed 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 5
—PRP 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 7
*S/E_2a: § 107 Cost
Recovery Referrals
toIIQ 8 9 11 5 6 4 7 1 6 3 60
* This measure requires Regional targets
** Will be determined after Regional submittal.
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0—1
S/C-6:
ROD/EDO CANDIDATE LIST
o RODS :
FIRST
SUBSEQUENT
Region I:
Ottat.i and Goss, NH
Yaworski Waste, CT
Keefe Environmental, NH
Delilah Road, NJ
ElIlis Property, NJ
Pepe Field, NJ
Rocky Hill Municipal
Sycon Resins, NJ
Volney Municipal, NY
York Oil, NY
Kentucky Avenue, NY
Beachwood/Berkley Wells, NJ
Cinnarninson Groundwater, NJ
Ewan Property, NJ
Katonah Municipal Well, NY
Montgomery Township, NJ
Reich Farms, NJ
Waldick Aerospace, NJ
Williams ?rooery, NJ
Fried Property, NJ
Myers Property, NJ
Chemical Control, NJ
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Lone Pine Landfill,
Pollution Abate-nent
Region III:
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
Kane and Lombard, MD
Southern riaryland Wood, MD
Wildcat Landfill, DE
L.A. Clarke, VA
Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
Drake Chemical, PA
Region IV:
American Creosote, FL
Geiger (C&M Oil),SC
Mowbray Engineering, AL
SCRDI/Bluff Road, SC
SCRDI/Dixiana, SC
American Creosote, TN
Region V:
riaster Disposal, WI
Rose Township Dump, MI
Springfiled Township Dump, iI
Laskin/Poplar, OH
Liquid Disposal, MI
Mid—State Disposal, WI
Byron Salvage, IL
Verona Welifield, MI
Region II:
Well, NJ
NJ
(PAS), NY
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0-i
S/C-6:
o RODs :
ROD/EDD CANDIDATE LIST (cont.)
FIRST
SUBSEQUENT
Region VI:
Cleve Rever, LA
French Ltd, TX
Sand S?rings, OK
Pet ro—Cheniical, TX
Motco, TX
Bayou Bonfouca, LA
Odessa 41, TX
Odessa 42, TX
Region VII:
Arkansas City Dump, KS
Doepke Disposal, KS
Cherokee County, KS
Hastings Groundwater, NE
North Farm Sludge, IA
Red Oak City Landfill, IA
1inker/Stout/Rornaine Creek, MO
Times Beach, MO
Region VIII:
Central City/Clear Creek, CO
Monticello, UT
Militown, MT
Region IX:
Tucson Airport, AZ
Stringfellow, CA
Region X:
Colbert Landfill, WA
Frontier Hard Chrome, WA
Northside Landfill, WA
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0—i
S/C-6: ROD/EDD Candidate List
°EDDS:
FIRST SUBSEQUENT
Region I Laurel Park, Inc., CT
Ti tkham Site Garage, NH
Region II Albert Steel Druri, NJ
Batavia Landfill, NY
Cherucal Insecticide, NJ
Derewal Chemical, NJ
Frontera Creek, PR
G.E. Wiring Devices, NY
General Switch, NY
Jame Fine Chemical, NJ
Juncos Landfill, PR
Kin Buc Landfill, NJ
Lang Property, NJ
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
Renora TownshiD, NJ
Ringwood r ines, NJ
Toms River Chemical (CIBA GEIGY), NJ
U.S. Radium, NJ
Vega Alta Public Supply Wells, PR
Region III Arnchem I, PA
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV
Region IV B.F. Goodrich, KY
Carolawn—SCRDI, SC
Chemtroriics, NC
Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., FL
Lee’s Lane Landfill, KY
Murray-Ohio Dump, TN
Newport Dunip, KY
Pickettville Road Landfill, FL
Tower Chemical, FL
Wamchem Inc., SC
Zellwood Ground Water Contamination, FL
Region V : Buckeye Reclamation, OH
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
Coshoctori City Landill, 0!-!
Enviro—Chem, IN
Johns Manville Corp, IL
Miami County Incinerator, OH
MIDCO I, IN
MIDCO II, IN
Northside Sanitary Landfill, IN
Whittaker Corp. , MN
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0—1
S/C—6: ROD/EDD Candidate List (cont.)
EDDs (cont..)
FIRST SUBSEQUENT
Region VI : ATSE—Clovis (Santa Fe Lake), NM V rtac (Off—site),
Bayou Sorrel, LA AR
Gurley Pit, AR
1-lardage/Criner, OK
Industrial Waste Control, AR
Petro Processors, LA
Soutn Valley, NM
Region VII : Fulbright Landfill, MO
Labounty, IA
Shenandoah Stables (Horse Arenas),
MO
Waverly G’ Contariination, NE
Region VIII: Broderick Wood Products Co. , CO
California Gulch, CO
Lowry Landfill, CO
Region X Queen City Farms,
WA
NOTE: This ‘87 candidate list was drawn from projected EDD’s for
4Q86 that will likely be delayed, plus 1Q and 2Q87
projections, from Regional SCAPs. In addition to these,
Regions are to add any 3Q and 4Q87 projected EDD’s which
they predict will not slip to FY83 because of reauthori-
zation.
-------
OSWER DIRECTIvE 9370.0—1
sPrIS Site Listing
s/C-8 - REMEDIAL ACTION IUPLEMENTATION COMPLETION
o Fund—Financed :
Region VI — Tar Creek, OK 87/1
Triangle Chemical, TX 87/2
Region VII - Aidex, lÀ 87/3
Region IX - Jibboorn, CA 87/1
Region X — Lakewood, 7A 87/4
o PRP—Financed :
Region II — Kin—Buc Landfill, NJ
Olean Weilfields, NY 87/3
Region III — Lancaster Metal Science, PA
Metal Bank of America, PA
Region V — Fisher—Cab, IN 87/3
Northern Engraving, WI 87/3
Region VII — Conservation Chemical, MO 87/2
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.0—i
S/E—2a: §107 Cost Recovery Referrals to HQ— Candidate List
Removals:
Region I : Rye Street Pesticide, CT
Lowell Road, MA
Shady Lane Asbestos, NH
*Ptne Street Canal, VT
*Union Chemical Co., ME
Region II : *
-------
OSWER DIRECTIVE 9370.O-.i
S/E—2a: §107 Cost Recovery Referrals to HQ—Candidate List
Remedials:
Regiofl I Keefe Environmental Services, NE!
Re-Solve Inc. , MA
1cKin Company, ME
Region II : Bridgeport Rental, NJ
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ
Lone Pine Landfill, NJ
D’Irnperio Property, NJ
Krysowaty Farm, NJ
Chemical Control, NJ
Hudson River PCB’s, NY
Region III : Bruin Lagoon, PA
Matthews Electro., VA
Drake Chemical, PA
Lackawanria Refuse, PA
Heleva Landfill, PA
Landsdowne, PA
Region IV : Whitehouse Oil Pits, FL
Region V : Gratiot County L/F, MI
Outboard Marine Corp. , MI
Byron Salvage Yard,IL
Main Street Well Field, IN
Kurimer Landfill, MN
Region VI : Tar Creek/Ottawa City, OK
Bio-Ecology Systems, TX
Old Inger Oil, LA
Highlands Acid Pit, TX
Region VII : t4inker/Stout, MO
Times Beach Site, MO
Region VIII : Milltown Reservoir Sediments, MT
Region IX : Mountain View/Globe, AZ
Jibboom Junkyard, CA
Taputimu Farm
Region X : Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma, WA
Note: The draft SCAP Hethodologies sent out in June were not
used for computing this preliminary target because HQ decided it
was not appropriate for setting Regional targets at this time,
and will be revised. In the interim, all potential cost recovery
candidates are listed above, without factoring out those which
may be orphan sites, those with bankrupt PRPs, etc. The Regions
should review the candidates and delete those which are not
feasible, with appropriate reasons given for each.
This target counts referrals that are solely for cost recovery,
i.e. it does not include sites referred with a §106 count. §106/
§107 cases will be counted under S/E—2b and have been budgeted that
way for resource allocation.
------- |