XEA
    AHT
         WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH
       Projects of the
 Industrial  Pollution Control Branch
                     August 1969
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION

-------
                  PROJECTS




     INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH




           William J. Lacy, Chief
                  August 1969
  Division of Applied Science and Technology




       Office of Research & Development




Federal Water Pollution Control Administration




   UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECTS of the ThDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH
PAGE
A. Industrial Pollution Control Technology 1
B. Tables
I. Estimated Volume of Industrial Wastes
Before Treatment-l963 12
II. Waste Water Characteristics & Pollutants of
Selected Industry Groups 13
III. Comparative Pollution Index Based on Surface
Water Criteria for Public Water Supplies 1 4
IV. Standard Industrial Classification of Industries
of Signiricance for Water Pollution 15
V. Source of Pollutants & Relative Priorities 16
VI. Water Quality Parameters 17
VII. Pollution Control Program Summary 18
VIII. Total Current Value of Waste Treatment Requirements
of Major Industrial Establishments 19
IX. Program Schedule of Milestones 20
C. Figures
I. Trends & Use of Water for Public Supplies, Rural
Sipplies, Lt rigation, and Industry, l9l4 5 l965 21
II. Dollar Value of Projects 22
III. Project Participation 23
TV. Location of Projects 2 4
D. Project Information Sheets
PPB 1106 Joint Municipal Industrial . . . . 25
PPB 1201 Metal & Metal Products
PPB 1202 Chemicals & Allied Products ... 61
PPB 120)4 Paper & Allied Products 75
PPB 1205 Petroleum & Cool Products 97
PPB 1206 Food & Kindred Products 109
PPB 1207 Machinery & Transportation Equipment 1)41
PPB 1208 Stone, Clay & Glass Products l 43
PPB 1209 Textile Mill Products 1)47
PPB 1210 Lumber & Wood Products 155
PPB 1212 Others 159
lii

-------
INDUSTRIAL FOLIIUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGT
INTRODUCTION
Industries use hugh quantities of the Nat.ion’s waters and are the’ major
factor in the continuing rise in water pollution. They utilize over
15 trillion gallons of water but, prior to discharge, treat less than
5 trillion gallons. In terms of a single pollution parameter (a)D),
waste generated by industries are equivalent to a total population of
over 360 million people. Even more undesirable than the D loads
of industrial effluents are the enormous quantities of’ mineral and chein—
ical wastes from factories which steadily become more complex and varied.
They include metals such as iron, chromium, nickle, and copper; salts
such as compounds of sodium, calcium, and magnesium; acids such as
sulfuric and hydrochloric; petroleum wastes and brines; phenols, cyanid s;
aimnonia; toluene; blast furnace wastes; greases; all varieties of sus-
pended and dissolved solids; and numerous other waste compounds. These
wastes degrade the quality of receiving waters by causing tastes, odors,
and color; and excess mineralization, salinity, hardness, and corrosion.
Some are toxic to plant and animal life.
The variety and ‘complexity of inorganic and organic components contained
in industrial effluents present a serious liquid wastewater treatment
control problem in that the pollution and toxicity effects of these
constituents are of greater significance than those found in domestic
wastewaters.
Conventional wastewater treatment techno1o which is often adequate for
existing waste types, offers even less promise of providing the type and
degree of treatment to be required in the near future. Industrial
pollution control technolo r, therefore, must be developed and demonstrated
to achieve effective and economical control of pollution from such indus-
tries as those producing metal and metal products, chemical and 11ied
products, paper and 11ied products, petroleum and coal products, food
and kindred products, textiles and leather gcods.
To continue the attack on the problem of industrial pollution will require
a cooperative industry—government effort to conceive, research, develop,
and demonstrate treatment processes, production modifications, water
reuse and water conservation programs. The ongoing research and demonstra-
tions, funded by Section 6 grants, have been made to manufacturers and
processors representing about every major source of industrial pollution.
The continued and expanded support is urgently needed specificafl.y to
implement the demonstration R&D programs related to new or improved
techrolo&y for the treatment, reuse, and/or disposal of industrial waste—
waters and their sludge residues. Existing data suggests that about
half of the total volumes of wastes processed by municipalities is of
I

-------
industrial origin. uphasis must be continued to achieve the most effective
water pollution control by means of joint municipal—industrial treatment.
Another key area where the efforts must be expanded involves the denionstra-
tion of by—product recovex y and utilization.
In this respect, the most promising and beneficial area requiring additional
support is the implementation of closed—loop (water reuse) treatment
systems for the industry.
An accelerated industrial pollution control research, develo mient, and
demonstration program wil] measurably decrease the amount of expenditures
needed to accomplish these goals, increase the efficiency of treatment,
and eliminate the gaps in treatment technology.
OB 1 3ECTIVE
The objective of the industrial poUut on control R&D program is to develop
and demonstrate the required technology to achieve required degrees of
pollution control by lease cost methods for all significant industrial
sources of pollution.
P GRAM OF WQ
The program includes all research, development, and demonstration efforts
necessary to resolve industrial pollution prcblems.
The objectives will be met by using the research and development grant
mechanism, supplemented by in-house laboratory programs. The*IPCB will
implement and administer demonstration projects for new and novel indus-
trial wastewater treatment projects applicable for the majority of all
significant industries. These demonstrations will include the latest
developments in physical, chemical, biological, and combinations of
treatment methods. It is expected to develop further the cooperation of
industry to participate in meaningful pollution abatement demonstrations
and to increasingly demonstrate the feasibility of in—plant measures,
by—product recovery, and wastewater reuse as methods to abate pollution
and to reduce treatment costs.
Research thrcug i in—house efforts and by contracts to industries and uni-
versities are to complete state of the art studies related to treatment
arid control technology for selected industry groups. Similarly, industrial
wastewaters are to be identified, characterized, quantitized and classified
for all industries of poflutionaJ. significance.
‘Phe Industrial Pollution Control Branch

-------
Industrial wastes are the NatiOns principal point sources of controllable
waterborn wastes. In terms of the generally quoted measurements of strength
and volume, gross wastes of manufacturing establishments are about three times
as great as those of the Nation’s sewered population (reference Table I).
Moreover, the volume of industrial production, which gives rise to industrial.
wastes, is increasing at about 4.5% a year or three times faster than the
population. A so significant is the variance of composition of industrial
wastes, which contain all known pollutants of concern in water pollution
abatement as well as some unidentified factors.
Table I shows reported quatitities of industrial wastewaters discharged in 1963
and F 1PCA estimates of the quantities of standard biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD 5 ) and settleable and suspended solids contained in the wastewaters. The
wasteload estimates, based upon an ‘estimate of the “average” quantity of
p Uutant per product unit, indicate that the chemical, paper, and food and
ldndred industrial groups generated about 90% of the DOD in industri.al
wastewater be pre t eatwent .
Similar statistics on net wasteload discharges are not completely available.
However, indications are that the extent of industrial wastewater treatment is
not greater than that currently practiced for municipal. wastewaters.
Industrial wastes differ markedly in chemical composition, physical charact-
eristics, strength, and to dcity from wastes found in normal domestic
sewage. Every conceivable toxtcant and pollutant of organic and inorganic
nature can be found in industrial wastewaters, as indicated in Table II
for selected industries. Thus the DOD or solids content often are not
adequate indicators of the quality oI’ i idustrial effluents. For example,
industrial wastes frequently contain persistent organics which resist the
secondary treatment procedures applied normally to domestic sewage. In
addition, some industrial effluents require that specific organic compounds
be stabilized or that trace elements be removed as part of the treatment
process.
It is therefore necessary to characterize each industrial wastewater to
permit comparative pollutional assessments to be made for individual
industries as well as industry groups. Characterization will permit
classifying the components ol ’ industrial wastewaters into as few as four
basic classes of pollutants to more readily collate pollution statistics
and to evaluate economics of methods of treatment as well as to project
lease cost methods. Proposed generalized basic classification parameters
are DOD, COD, SS, and TDS into which all known pollutants can be classed.
Also required is the establislunent of a relative pollution comparative
index for all significant pollutants. This index in combination with the
known characteristics and volume of a wastewater will determine the rela-
tive gross pollution sever ity of all industrial wastes and establish
(1)
Note the 1200 program described herein does not include thermal pollution
requirement and associated problems.

-------
a basis for comparing the Severity of pollution from industries.
Table III presents permissible criteria for surface water for public
supplies as obtained from the Report of the Conmittee on Water Quality
Criteria, April 1, 3968. The addition of an assumed BUD 5 value of
5m /lto these criteria permits comparisons of the listed pollutants to
be made against a unit of BOD. Under these circumstances it is relative-
iy apparent that pollutants such as drin and Phenol (on amg4 concentration
equivalent basis) are 5000 times more critical as pollutants than BUD.
Further work in thi s area will permit establishment of more accurate
priorities in terms of our nations most critical needs.
Industrial wastes will require the developnent, demonstration, and
evaluation of treatment methods suitable for each significant industrial
waste type which is significantly different from domestic waste.
Table IV is a listing of all major industry groups and industries of
suspected significant contributions to water pollution. These have been
selected on th basis of a p ocess water intake of at least 1 billion
gallons per year and with regards to the potential for pollution from
the process use of the water. For program planning and budgeting purposes,
the industries’are grouped ir to thirteen subprogram elements as shown in
column one of Table I. Within each element, the identity of industry
group(s) by their Standard Industrial Classification code number is also
presented as in column two of Table I.
The industries listed in Table III number appro d.mate].y 150 and represent
potentially equally numerous wastewaters of significantly different char-
acteristics, for which treatment technology must either be developed or
upgraded, The interchangeability of treatment technology between similar
type8 of wastewaters is anticipated but will have to be demonstrated
through results of grant research projects, or in house studies. Because
resource allocations may nqt be sufficient to encompass the potential R&D
demand imposed by the diverse nature of industrial wastes, a priority
system must be established and used in the allocation of R&D efforts for
industrial wastewater problems.
At this time a firm priority for R&D activities based on an ultimate com-
parable basis of pollution severity, has not been established for industrial
wastes, However, a cursory examination of Table I, and assuming the (BUD 5 )
parameters of pollution severity as the prime indicator of pollution,
initial basis for raiild.n,g the industry groups for priority R&D efforts, is
possible, However, 1a o4edge of 4.1 ]. chemical and physical parameters of
pollution, as well as the state of the art and economic considerations
are necessary to more adequately assess priority for R&D investments,
Tables V and VI list National Priorities for both pollution sources and
water quality parameters, These were established on the basis of best
available ini’ormation in order to establish an initial base.
4

-------
In spite of the comp1e dty and ma itude of industrial pollution, initial
estimates of the costs of clean waters from industrial sources have been
made. As suimnarized in Table VII industrial capital requiremenEs to
abate pollution by 1973 to the extent of providing 5% treatment effective-
ness, are substantially less than estimated capital requirements for
municipal treatment or collection facilities for separting combined sewers,
while the gross pollutional load contributed is substantially greater than
either. This indicates that the average cost of industrial waste treatment
is substantially less than f r municipal waste treatment when based on
treatment cost per lb BDD. If these estimates are reasonably accurate it
wculd appear that for the most part industrial pollution control to the
equivalency of secondary treatment is within a reasonable cost and need
only be developed and demonstrated for the various industries in our
econon r which are sigñific nt contributors of pollution.
In summary the needs show that the 1200 program must be primarily dedicated
to the attainment of:
1. Qualifying and quantitizing industrial wastes and treatment practices.
2. Implementation of undemonstrated but feasible treatment methods to
as many types of industries as possible.
3. Reduce cost of treatment by the beneficial recovery and reuse of waste—
water contaminants.
PLP N
1. Technical Consideration : The alternatives in wastewater treatment
are shown in sun nary flow diagram below.
Wpter Reuse J Add
I ITreat
Water Supply I Industryj _ stewater [ Treatmentj to Environmen
Reuse
By Product —
M a rket Recovery
To Environment
5.

-------
The alternatives shown primaril y consist of:
a. Ijastewater Treatn ent (as required to abate pollution to meet
water quality standards)
(1) 1 or discharge (to meet necessary water quality criteria)
(2) j or reuse (to meet industrial water quality demands to
conserve water and offset cost of treatment).
h. In—plant Measures (to reduce pollutants and water discharge)
(1) Operational (housekeeping techniques and manufacturing
procedures)
(2) sj (to permit reuse, to reduce wastewater generation)
c. R due Treatnient ,
(1) Rv— roduct recovery - (to reduce gross disposal, utilizes
values)
(2) R gi jue tpbjJ zptjpn (to meet environmental standards)
d. mbined Methods
(1) 1 Joint Treatir ent (to utilize scale factors, off peak capacity,
Synergistic effects)
(2) ther (combined a—b—c methods as appropriate)
The alternatives best suited for implementation in specific 1200 programs
will depend on many factors and local conditions. Where the state—of—art
of treatment is essentially non—existing, emphasis on treatment to meet
envirormienta]. standards should prevail. For p.onprogressjve industries,
in—plant measures should be explored for potential application. For
industries which have demonstrated effective treatment methods, lower cost
alternatives of treatment stressing reuse and by—product recovery should
be gi’ren consideration.
1. General : To provide each basic industry the d monstrated, developed,
and evaluated techno1o r £ or the abatement or prevention of water pollution
from individual or multiple wastewater sources, by new or improved methods
and techniques which have potential value for industry wide application
where no methods exist or over existing methods employed.
In summary, to upgrade the state—of—art for the treatment of all industrial
wastewaters.
2. Specific : a. Technical:
1. Define pre and post program state—of—art.
2. Establish arid maintain centers of excellence to assist in
state—of--art maintenance.
3. 2evelop cooperatjc’n of industry to maintain state of art.
4. Develop technical, design and operational guides for each
industrial wast,e of significance.
5. Characterize industrial wastewaters and classify the pollutants
into the four major categories of B)D, COD, TE or SS.
6. Develop comparable criteria for pollutional severity of con—
taminants.
7. Establish relative severity of industrial wastewater pollutants
in terms of total discharges.

-------
b. Economic:
1. Develop comparable basis for economic evaluation of industrial
waste treatment.
2. Determine pre and post program, economics of industrial waste—
water treatment.
3. Show that cost of adequate wastewater treatment will not bxceed
1 to 2% of the total cost of industrial operations.
c. Demonstrate for each industry of significance:
1. Feasibility of effective treatment (=85% removal) systems
2. Effective (=85% removal) treatment systems within the following
costs:
for BOD removel = 13.5 4OOO gal or = 1 4b BOD
for COD = L4 /1OOO gal or = 3 /1b COD
for TDS = 15 /lOOO g al or =.O5 /1b TDS
for SS = 6 /LOOO gal or = 1 /lb SS
3. Least cost methods either directly or through inference from
the results of program activities.
4. By—produce recovery- end wastewater reuse as feasible methods
of pollution control.
5. Total wastewater reuse and residue conversion to utility value.
ORGANIZATION
1. General : The organization of the 1200 program showing interrelation-
ships of activities to meet objectives and goals is shown in figure 1.
Also it is shown in outline form to consist of three major efforts, admin-
istrative, activiUes development, and implementation projects.
7

-------
ORGANIZATION OUTLINE
1. Adiainistration
a. Centers of exceflence
b. Activities Development
c. Implexnentatior program
2. kctjyjties Developp enf
a. Centers of excellence
1. TechnicaJ. In.forination Ac .ivities
a. Wastewaters characterization
b. Criteria for pollutants comparability
C. Standards of performance
2. Economic Bases
a. Denionst ration Grants
b. Industry Wide Impact
b. State of Art
1. Initial (by contract)
2. Periodic (In—house)
3. Terminal (In-house)
c. Cooperation of Industries
1. Participation in implementation program (though grants and contracts)
2. To develop wastewater treatment standard (In—house & with respective
mfg. association)
3. Maintain R&D implementation
4. Disseminate information
3. Imp ementat on Project,s
a. Research
b. Development
C • Demonstrat on & Evaluation
d. Tecbriical—Econontj.cs of Wastewater treatment processes
S

-------
It should be apparent that extensive cooperation and conmrunication among
all participants and activities dll be required.
The program is orientated to upgrade th state-of art for industrial
waste treatment to the extent that industries will thereafter continue
to maintain the art in a progres 3iVe manner with minimum Federal R&D
assistance. Therefore, it is imperative that the cooperation of industry
be attained in the earliest phases of this program.
SCHEDULE AN]) NILESTONE&
There are three major milestones to be demonstrated for each major industry
category. Attainment of these milestones will provide an upgraded state—
of—art for industrial wastewater treatment which will allow substantial
decreased Federal R&D efforts to subside in favor of industry’s own continued
maintairienCe program.
The major milestones are:
1. DemonstratiOn of the equivalence of secondary treatment for all industries
of significance within each industrial category. The equivalence of secondary
treatment is the removal of about 85% of the primary pollutants from indus-
trial wastewaters.
2. Development and demonstration of the necessary treatment requirements
for industrial wastewaters of significance to the extent required to meet
state and local water quality criteria. In a majority of cases this require-
ment can be attained by the removal of up to 98% of primary pollutants, or
the removal to a high degree (85%) of secondary but significant contaminantes
from industrial wastewaters.
3. Develop and demonstrate the means to control all major pollutants from
all industries.
These aUestones are to be attained in the years as shown in Table VIII for
the industrial categories indicated.
q

-------
TECHNICAL PAPERS
LACY, W.J., “Research and Development Program — Industrial Waste Confer nce,”
American Cultured Dairy Products Institute Meeting, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York, Oct., 1967.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “The Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Research arid Development Program: Industrial Pollution Control,” American
Electroplaters Society Convention, San Francisco, Calif., July, 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., REY, G., “Industrial Pollution Control, Research and
Development Program,” Southwest Regional American Chemical Society Meeting,
Austin, Texas, Dec. 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Research
and Development Program: Industrial PoL 1 .ution Control,” Platiri , pg. 1299.
Dec., 1968.
LACY, W.J., CYWIN, A., “Financial Aspects of Industrial Pollution Abatement,
Research and Development,” American Association of Textile Chemists and
Colorist Meeting, Washington, D.C. Feb., 1969.
LACY, W 0 J., CYWIM, A., “Federal Assistance Available to Companies Establishing
Pollution Control Prograi s, Textile Chemist and Colorist , , (7), pg. 25,
March 1969.
LACY, W.J., “Industrial Water Pollution Control Research and Development,”
Engineer and Scientist Society Meeting, Patuxent River, Md., June, 1969.
LACY, W.J., CIWIN, A 0 , “Federal Grants Available for Industrial Pollution
Control,” Water and Sewage Works: Industrial Waste SutiiLe ient . pg. 12, May, 1969.
REY, G., CYWIN, A., BERNARD, H., DEA, S., “Distillation of Wastewaters: A
Water R sou.rce for Arid Regions,” International Conference on Arid Lands in a
Changing World, Tueson, Az. June, 1969.
PARK, P.K., WEBSTER, G.R., YAHANOTO, E., “Alkalinity Budget of the Columbia
River,” Limnology and Oceano ra hy , , (4), pg. 559, July 1969.
PARK, P.K., WEBSTER, G.R., CATALFOMO,M., REID, B.H., “Nutrients and Carbon
Dioxide in Columbia River,” Liziinology nd QceanoRraDhy, , (to be published)
lACY, W. J., “Industrial Water Pollution Control — FWPCA Research and Development
Program.” Conference on the Treatment and Disposal of Waste from Vegetable
Processing, New Orleans, La., August 1969.
I0

-------
PROJECT REPORTS
FWPCA Title, Author
Report No . _______________________
ORD-1 ‘ Joint Municipal & Sexnichemical Waste Treatment, ”
City of Erie, Pa., Hainmermill Paper Company,
July 1969, 11060 EOC, WPRD 223-01-68.
ORD-2 “ Disposal of Wastes from Water Treatment Plants, ”
American Water Works Association Research Foundation,
August 1969, 12120 ERC, WP 1535-01-69.
ORD-5 “ Activated Sludge Treatment of Chrome Tannery Wastes, ”
A. C. Lawrence Leather Company,
August 1969, 12120, WPRD 133-01-68.
DAST-3 “ Foam Separation of Kraft Pulping Wastes, ”
Georgia Kraft Company,
September 1969, 12O 4O EUG, WPRD 117-01-68.
II

-------
TABLE I ESTIMATED VOLUME OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES BEFORE TREATMENT. 1968
PPB S1C.. ’ Industry Total 7 Waste- Process Water Intake- Standard Bro-Chem Seuleable and Suspecde Solids.
Code Code Group(s) water, billion gal Billion gallons Oxygen Demand Million Million pounds
l2°l 33,34 Metal & Metal Products >4.300 1.000 .480 >4.700
1202 28 Chemical & Allied Products 3,700 560 9.700 1.900
1203 —- Power Production (NA) N A . / N A N A
1204 26 Paper & Allied Products 1,900 1.300 5,000 3,000
1205 29 Petroleum & Coal 1.300 88 500 460
1206 20 Food & Kindred Products 690 260 4.300 6.600
1207 35.36,37 Machinery & Transportation Equip 481 109 250
1208 32 Stone. Clay, and Glass Products (2l8) -/ 88 N A N A
1209 22 Textile Mill Products 140 110 890 N A
1210 24,25 Lumber & Vvood Products (126) . ./ N A
1211 30 Rubber & Plastics 160 50
1212 12.19.21.27 Miscellaneous Industrial Sources i J 190 3Q
31. 38.39.72
1200 All Manu(actunng 13.100 3.700 22.000 18.000
For Conipanson
sewered population of U S 5 300 .!J N 7.300 8.8O0 - I
JJ 120.000.000 persons r 120 gallons a 365 days j/ Standard Industrial Classification IIncludes cooling water and
, f 120.000,000 persons x 1/5 pounds a 365 days / Not Available or Not Applicable Steam productiou waters
/i20.oo0.o0o persons a 0 2 pounds a 365 days / Included in Total for AU Mfg
(1) Ref Volume II The Cost of Clean Wscers 1968

-------
TABLE 11
IJASTEWATB CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTANTS
OF SELECTED INDUSTRY GROUPS
slc_çqoE. 201 203 22 26 261 282 2911 311 1 331 3334 3722
- - — - Fibers - - Steel
Liquid Westa ‘ Domestic Mool. Canned & Textile Mill Peoer & Oxoic Flasticu Petroleum Leather Tunningi Roth eg - Pr’me,v ‘Motor Vehicles
Ctlerecterislic — Products 5 rOzen Foods Sugar Products Allied Products Chemicals & Rubbers Fertilizer Retining & Finisnlng & Finishing Aluminum 1 _.Y!Y!!
UNIT VOLIJUKS A A A K K K x it A K it K K K
A I K. 5 5 A ). it it K X 1
ACiDI TS A K K __A it K A
Ae.ALiNre, K it X a K K — Z
COt.OR - : -
O D i n it K it K
10tALKOUPK A it it K it it A x K K I
RJKP5NDEDKOLiOS A A A it K K it it K K K
TEMPERATUeK — x it It it it it A
eOD5/nOuijfline . A A A it It K K - K K K L
x
oi lscetuss A K it K K K it 5 x
DEt c e cc eas A
(KurK.i.mrtti K it it K K
crItOni o s A K it it it x K A
rtcAvitM ct •LK
Ceenrui
Ctlimniiun 5 K K S
ceeKei it K 3
it a A
—. Len 3
i t i t
i N ’cK.i it K
it it
N ITeOGEN
Ainmnn ,a A i t K it K K 1 K K
Nitiale
suite it x
O ,@xi.c - A K A x
m l xi A it K it it
•IiO9VI0 IK K it K
Pt4KN0 it P K
SULFiDE — - i t it
TURKtDiTit K it A
SIJLKATE K it it A it
it it
McecaprAns - it K
Lic ir lir IK — X
K
- —
POTA SSiUM it C
CALCIUM it K
poLeitAcci l ueloes - X it
Ai it it
SODiUM it it it
rLUoeIoEs X K K
SILICA - K K
T0C K
.rscsj
AMMONIA it
CTAIItOK at K K
THIOCYANATE it K
FEeSOUS eQs K -it it
- it
ALUMIrIittA — — — — - — - - — — - it
•Knt Vuien. it rc. Cent n’ nun m 1 •.. IrK

-------
TABLE Ill
Con arative Pollution Index Based on
Surface Water Criteria for Pubtic Water Supplies
Constituent or characteristic Prnmissible Relative Paragraph
Criteria Criteria
Physical
Color ( olar units). 75’
0 do Narrative 2
Temperature do ..a .3
Turbidity do 4
Microbiological
Coliform organisms 10.000/100 mu
Fecal coliforiTis 2 .000,’iOO mIt.. 5
inorganic chemicals (m ’l)
Alkalinity Narrative
Ammoni 0 5 (aS N ) 0 1... 7
Arsenic’ 0 05 0 01 8
Barium .. 1 0 0 2 8
Boro 1 0
Cadmium• .0 01 8
Chloride 250 50 8
Chromium’, he, ’avalent 0 05 8
1 0.... — . 8
Dissolved oxygen. 4(monthly mean). 10
3(individuat sample)
Fluoride’ Narrative .41
Hardness do 12
Iron (filterable) 0 3 8
Leod 005 01, ‘8
Manganese’ (filterable) . 0 05 01 8
Nitrates plus nitrites 10 (as N) 13
pH (range) 6 0—8 5 .14
Phosphorus .Nerrative (5
Selenium 0 01 8
Silve 0 05 B
Sulfate 250 50
Total dissolved s lids’ 500 100’ ..16
ifiiterable residue)
Uranyl io 5 1 17
Zinc 1 8
Organic chemicals
Carbon chloroform extract’ (CCE) 0 15 18
Cyanide’ 0.20 8
Methylene blue active substances ’S 0.5’
Oil and grease Virtually absent 20
Pesticides
Aldri 0017 21
Chlordane 0 303 21
DOT 0 042 21
Dieldrin 0017 21
Endri 0001 0002 21
Heptachlor 0 018 21
Heotachlor epoxide 0018 . . 21
Lindane ONi6 21
Methoxychlo 0 035 21
Organic phosphates plus ‘0 12 21
carbamates
Toxaphene ’ 0 005 8
Herbcides
2 4DpluS 2.4,5-T,plus 2.4 5-TP 0 1 .02 21
Pheno s 0001 0002 8
Radioactivity (pc’l)
Gross beta 1 000 8
Radiiun-226 2 8
Strontiun i-90 10(41 1 8
BOD
The defined ire8imoflt process has little effect on ih ,q 3) Au eiaiive *0 BOD
constuent 4) Moe voiue found .n tap weld analysis of 20 000vnuntiet
I MucrObOiOgCal iim,iS are mOnthiy arithmeUc overoaoo
based upon ar odeQuete numter of s n 5 ,i (5 ) Reporl of ‘ire Con.m,ttne on Wirer Ouuirty Creria A ir,l 1 1980
Totril coifOrm imli may be ciaxed if fecai coi,form concen-
tenon does nut ecceed the specified limit 2 As parathion
in choinesterose ,nhb,t’on it nay be necessary tO reSell
to even lower conceotrsnons for nome c rr oundS Or mixiurds
Si’s Para 9 rsph 2*
is

-------
TABLE IV
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION OF
INDUSTRIES OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR WATER POLLTUION
FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS
Meat products
Meat slughtenng plants
Meat processing plants
Meat processing plants
Poultry dressing plants
Dairies
Creamery butter
Creamery butler
Natural and precess cheese
Condensed and evaporated milk
Fluid milk
Canned and frozen foods
Canned fruits and vegetables
Dehydrated foods products
Pickles, sauces, salad dressings
Frozen fruits and vegetables
Grain mills
Flour mills
Cereal preparations
Wet corn milling
Bakery products
Sugar
Candy and related products
Beverages
Malt liquors
Wines and bt brandy
Distilled liquor.
Soft drinks
Miscellaneous foods and kindred products
Cottonseed oil mills
Soybean oil mills
Animal and manne fats and oils
Shortening and cooking oils
TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS
2211 Weaving mills, cotton
2221 Weaving mills, synthetice
2231 Weaving, linishing mills. wool
225 Knitting mills
226 Textile finishing, except wool
228 Yarn and thread mills
229 Miscellaneous textile goods
24 LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS
242 Sawmills and planning mills
2421 Sawmills and planning mills
PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
Pulp mills
Paper mills, except building
Papei’board nulls
Paper and paperboard products
Paperboard containers and boxes
Building paper and board mills
28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
Basic chemicals
Alkalies and chlorine
Organic chemicals, n.e.c
Inorganic chemicals. n.e.c.
Fibers, plastics rubbers
Plastics materials & resins
Cellulosic man-made tibeis
Organic tibeis, noncellulosic
Drugs
Cleaning and toilet goods
Paints and allied products
Gum and wood chemicals
Agricultural chemicals
Miscellaneous chemical products
PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
Petroleum refining
Paving and rooting materials
RUBBER AND PLASTICS PRODUCTS, n e c
Rubber products, n e c.
Plastics products. n.e c
31 LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS
3111 Leather tanning and finishing
32 STONE CLAY, AND GLASS PRODUCTS
Flat glass
Cement, hydraulic
Structural clay products
Pottery and related products
Concrete and plas r products
Cut stone and stone products
Nometallic mineral products
33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
Steel rolling and finishing
Iron and steel toundnes
Primary nonferrous metal
Secondary nonferrous metals
CODE
26
2611
2621
2631
264
265
2861
CODE
201
2011
2013
2013
2015
202
2021
2021
2022
2023
2026
203
2033
2034
2035
2037
204
2041
2043
2046
205
208
207
208
2082
2084
2085
2088
209
2091
2092
2094
2096
281
2812
2818
2819
282
2821
2823
2824
283
284
2851
2861
287
289
29
2911
295
30
3069
3079
3211
3341
325
326
327
3281
329
331
332
333
3341
‘5

-------
TABLE V
SOURCES OF POLLUTION NATIONAL PRIORITIES
No Onto PPO Cotegory
Ptlortiy
I P4 ,&pcçs ,y I 1204
2 Moolclpol oowoood onto 2 1101
3 Powe (ibo,rofl pndoctlour 3 1203
4 Agrrcolloro roool4 4 1302
5 Soolo 8 oni d onoto 5 1 102
1103
0 Food nowolo Stony S t20N
7 Potrocbnlcol Stony 7 1202
N Itecotlos tron flow N 1303
N PotjoIo rsfbtç 5 9 1205
IN food ol e ID 130 4
O Mood & nod pidooto lodootry 1201
12 Noosuod dowano moon 12 1 10 5
13 MoS s I i &01
It 0r.d 14 ISO )
IS 0dps tIoo&ptot0ioo Id 1402
IN Orpomc dtooitcd lodesoy I i 1202
I ? S o dM o la IS 1401
IN I.poo.dioeoto 1204
It Noctootioo boon IN 1501
20 UniteS ot t o tim -oIl 1° 1104
21 T nlilo todootry IN 1209
22 Inorganic choodoal SAtniry 19 Lot
23 Comoroocial ooooob 20 1502
24 Coootroclloo ocllrurroo 21 1503
25 Potato procinlo ; 22 1206
26 Pbormocoorlcoi woonlocroro 2 4 1202
27 Pnrlcldo idoerry 24 1202
20 Soltworor uotrrroloo 25 i cOs
20 Pboopbo lo 0110105 20 1404
30 tog 1 to 6 77 1301
31 M.ib prodocto & hordhiog 20 1306
32 Farttbztt macfactor, 20 1202
33 Fob proc000top try 30 1206
34 Lorhotio g 3 1 1210
35 MIo rog 32 1404
36 Cool procoociog 73 ¶205
37 Strip ortoloN coot oood 0 Nt000li 04 1404
30 Uron l ou rotorog 35 1403
30 Mo n pocitrt 35 1205
40 M unich polbttloo 76 1505
I I Cooolog todootry 37 1200
42 Sogu boot lodootry 37 1276
43 Cattle ‘t tdootry 31 1304
44 Or hoso ON 1212
45 Ccppor mrntog 39 1404
46 Log oton o 39 1010
47 Agtmoltool cbamtcsl prodootwo 40 1202
49 Toooteg & Sotbor hodootry 41 1212
40 Nocloot hrtotoflothoo I I 1212
50 Nrowory wootot 42 t2
Dnolopod 190 0 1965

-------
TABLE VI
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Priority Parameter Pi lority Pai aineter
1 Fecal colifornis 35 Sullites & Sultides
2 temperature 36 Cyanide
3 Phosphates 36 DDT
4 Nitrogen compounds 36 Endrin
5 Dissolved oxygen 36 Dieldrin
B Pesticides 36 Textile waste
7 Heavy metals 37 CO 2
S Sultates 37 Chlordane
9 Nitrates
37 Sulfite liquors
10 Viruses
38 Fertilizer
11 pH 39 Color
12 Radioactive waste
13 Total organic carbon 39 Floating solids
14 Phenols 40 Conductivity
15 COD 41 Ethylene glycol
42 Salmonella
15 Total dissolved solids
16 Hydrocarbons 43 Taste & odor
17 H. Coil. 44 Iron
45 CCE
18 Oily wastes
19 Silting solids 46 ALgal nutrients
20 Chlorides 46 Salinity
21 Nitrites 46 Slime growth factors
22 Organic compounds 46 Streptococci
23 Turbidity 47 Arsenic
24 BUD 47 Manganese
25 Paper & PulP waste 48 Total oxygen demand
25 Suspended solids 49 Water soluble organic
26 Acidity 50 CAE
27 Sullides 50 Water insoluble organic
28 Acid Mine Waste si Non-ionic detergent
29 Alkalinity 52 Sodium
30 Herbicides 53
31 Lead 54 Flurides
32 Zinc 55 Aquatic biota
33 Sulfur compounds 56 H2S undissociated
34 Cooper 57 NH4OH unthssociated
17

-------
TABLE VII
POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM SUMMARY
Pollution Cost for Pollution Abatement Relative Gross Present Gross Relative Waste Type Projected
Control by 1913 - Billions of Dollars Pollution Load Load Treated Wastewater Total Water
Program Current Required 0&M Total ( B!0) Basis) ( 1962 - 64) Volume Use Increase
Cap. tnv Cap. mv 61 73 (% change
67 - 3 1954. 2000 )
Industrial 2 4 - 2 9 2 5 - 4.5 3 - 3 9 s 5 - 3 4 3 0(6) ,‘ 35% 0 71 All types 116
Pollution ( 35 - 43 (process
in 61)
Control waters only)
(.18 jointly)
Municipal (1) 40 8 - 8.7 14 . 17 94 - 10.4 1 0(7) 4/40% 1 0 Primarily 238
( 2 in 61)
Pollution
Control
> 2
Combined = 60 6 2 NA 6 2 0 4 ./‘ 60% 0 1 for Domestic 238
overt lows
Sewer and (for
>
Storm weste 25(3) NA 25 0 1 NA(5)
Overflow collection
Control system) 49(4) NA 49
(1) Includes Joint Treatment
(2) For Sanitary Sewers
(3) Storm Sewer Requirements for Urban Areas
(4) Complete Separation of Combined Sewers into Sanitary and Storm Sewers
(5)Fiot Applicable or Available
(6) Currently Jointly Treated
(7) Based on 120 Million Sewered Population
(8) For Overflows of Combined Systems

-------
TABLE VIII
Total current value of waste treatment requirements
of major industrial establishment*
Industry Fiscal 1969 Fiscal 1973
By Expert By Census
estimate projection
Food and kindred products 740 670
Textile mill products 170 170
Paper and allied products 320 920
Chemical and allied products 380 1000
Petroleum and coal 380 270
Rubber and plastics 41 59
Primary metals 1500 1400
Machinery 39 56
Electrical machinery 36 51
Transportation equipment 220 160
All other manufactunng 200 290
Total capital requirement 4000 5000
Plant currently provided.
By industry 2200 1800
Through municipal facilities 730 640
Current backlog 1100 2600
* Assuming at least 85% reduction of standard biochemical o, ygen demand (determined according to the five- day test) and of
settleable and suspended solids. -
** All values rounded to two significant figures, constant dollars.
t Based upon Industnal Waste Profiles in Volume III of the report.
if Based upon Census of Manufacturers data and established treatment cost factors

-------
TABLE IX
PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF MILESTONES
Tieatrnent Treatment
Secondary Required to Required to
Industrial Category Treatment meet Water Control all
PPB Milestones Equivalence Quality Criteria Major Pollutants
1201 Metal & Metal Products 1971 1973 1975
1202 Chemicals & Allied Products 1972 1974 1976
1203 Power Production 1972 1973
1204 Paper and Allied Products 1970 1973 1975
1205 Petroleum & Coal Products 1971 1973 1975
1206 Food and Kindred Products 1970 1973 1975
1207 Machinery & Transpoitation Equip. 1971 1973 1975
1208 Stone, Clay & Glass Products 1972 1973 — —
1209 Textile MillProducts 1971 1973 1975
1210 Lumber & Wood Products 1971 1973 1975
1211 Rubber & Plastics 1971 1973 1975
1212 Miscellaneous Industnal Sources 1972 1974 1976

-------
0
‘U
Q.
(I)
z
S
-J
z
0
IIIiH
0
1945
1950
1965
1960
1965
PUBLIC SUPPLIES
160
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
1945
SURFACE WATER
GROUND WATER
1950
1955
RURAL SUPPLIES
1960
1965
1RO
160
140
20
0
III
U
- --

—
—
ioo
80
--
IRRIGATION
1945 1965 1960 1065 1045 i sn 1956 1960 1965
40
FIG 1. TRENDS IN USE OF WATER FOR PUBLIC SUPPLIES.
RURAL SUPPLIES, III IGATION. AND INDUSTRY.
1945-65
INDUSTRY
20
0
Note: Surface-water data br 1945 not available

-------
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH PROJECTS
FIGURE II
“Dollar Value of Projects”
68 69
FISCAL YEAR
70
40 40
30
2O
10 10
67 68 69
Total Cost of Projects
Initiated Each Fiscal Year
Value of Grants Awarded
50 50 k — Cumulative Total Project
[ \V Costs
t\ J - thnm ’lative Value of Grants
Awarded
30
20
67
70
FISCAL YEAR

-------
FIGURE In
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH
PROJECT PARTICIPATION
68
- Pro.iects Per Yeer
70
C l )
0
0
p - I
rx -
0
Cumulative Projects -
Per Year
iL .0
120
100
80
60
20
67
69
FISCAL YEAR

-------
FIGURE IV
LOCATION OF
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONThOL BRANCH
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DE}C!$TR&TION CONTRACTS AND GRANTS
August 1969

-------
PPB 1106
JOINT MIThIICIPAL-INDUSTRIAL
110 60
Letters To GPO PN
27 DLF Tualatin, Oregon M. Kiado G. Keeler
29 Dallas, Oregon K. Dostal G. Keeler
60 Green Bay, Wise. C. Swanson G. Webster
66 Onondaga, New York L. Toi.insend G. Rey
111 EKK South St. Paul, Ninn. C. Oster G. Keeler
149 EJD Hagerstown, Maryland H. Snyder C. Ris
206 DJB Grand Forks, North 0. Olsen G. Keeler
Dakota
223 EOC Erie, Pennsylvania G. Webster G. Webster
246 Jacksonville, Arkansas G. Putnicki G. Rey
197 DBF Harriman, Tenn. E. Lornasney G. Webster
DUJ Walton, N.Y. A. RichardsonG. Keeler
DPD Macon, G.A. E. Lomasney G. Webster
DRT Stockton, Calif. J. Robertson G. Keeler
DRO Deleware R. Basin Corn. C. Paul G. Rey

-------
INFORMATION SHEET—--
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk 4 ohea de c.t bp b-t4t ty an R g V G an t undtst See. 6, a (2)
e.&aL Wa ten POLt t Cont&o,e Ac t(C.t Ua.tut Re4 tota.t on Ac tJ.
GRe4J1TEE : City of Tualatin, Oregon
TITLE OF PROJECT : Tertiary Treatment of Combined Domestic/Industrial
— Wastes
PROJECT SITE : Tualatin, Oregon DATE ALUARVEV : March 20, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $230,800 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $323,600
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-27-Ol-67 PPBS N 1106
11060 DLF —
PESCRTPTTON OF PROJECT : A secondary and tertiary sewage treatment plant
will be constructed for treatment of combined municipal and industrial wastes.
The industrial waste is generated by the manufacture of dog food and will
comprise 25% of the BOD load on the treatment plant. The plant will be
operated and studied for a period of one year. The tertiary-plant (consist-
ing of flocculation, settling and filtration) will be operated with the ad-
dition of alum for phosphate removal during the critical 6 months of low
stream flow. During the remainder of the year, the secondary effluent will
receive plain filtration to maintain a very high quality effluent. The
feasibility of alternate methods of chemical sludge disposal and the economics
of tertiary treatment with phosphate removal will be studied.
FWPCA P1 JEG’I’ OFFICER : Michael Kiado
INqUIRIES : Contae. t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
o Reoegtch aiid Veveja y,,,,
4/68 Fedvw.t Wa.tut. PoLf .t ô Cont’w,t
U.S. Vea tbren o the Intvu.o,t
HGK ill .1,,• ! .Ulr
hA .ngtot, V. C. 2024!

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCIl & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkta && .eL de.ac..t4ba tm4.t y an R 6 V Gtaitt auwt4ed undut See. 6
a(2)
Fe4e w2 ( t t Po!Ju.tà,n Contitot Ac. t(Ctegn Wa e/t Re6to!ta.t4 on Aet).
GRANTEE : City of Dallas, Oregon
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Co p1ete Aerobic Treatment of Combined Domestic and
Industrial Wastes with Mechanical Aeration
PROJECT SITE : Dallas, Oregon PATE ALUARVEV : Dec. 12, 1967
FEDERAL GRANT : 325,lO4 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $46 ,472
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-29-Ol-67 PPBS NO . 1106
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : Design and build a treatment plant to demonstrate
the economics and effidiency of the completely aerobic treatment method
when applied to the treatment of combined domestic and industrial wastes
from a small municipality. The industrial waste is generated by fruit
canning operations and by plywood glue manufacture and will comprise 75
of the BOD load on the treatment facility. The application of aerobic
digestion, mechanical surface aeration, and earthen embankment construc-
tion will be demonstrated.
ATUS OF PROJECI’ : Work ongoing.
PROJE DIRECrOR : Sidney S. Lasswell, CH 2 M, Corvallis, Oregon.
INQUIRIES : Con.tae..t the Industrial Pollution Control Bran h, DED
O i e o Re.sea.tth amd Vtvdop ieni
4/6 Fed QAOI Wa tejt PoUwt on Con.ttot Athr iL tatii,n
U.S. VepaM) e tt o £he lnte.nJ.o’t
. 113 L ...L....... .1...... tLW .
üh,ntni, 0. C- O24!
27

-------
INFORMATION SHEET — —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tà A4 £&eQ de civib, b-té4 fly ait R V Gn uitt auwtded undeA 6, a(2)
F 4uwj Wa.te.t Pof1wtj.o Cont&oe Act(Cteg,t Wa.W Ru ton.a ti.rni Ac1 ).
GRANTEE : Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District
Green Bay, Wisconsin
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Combined Industrial and Municipal Waste Treatment”
PROJECT SITE : Green Bay, Wisconsin PATE AWARVEV:Deceinber 1966
FEVERAL GRANT:$251,250 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $335,000
PROJECT NLIER:WpRP...6O _ 01..67 PPBS NO . 1106
‘1060 EDX
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT:The project will be a study, evaluation, and
determination of the effectiveness, design, and operating para-
meters of four alternative biological treatment processes and
modifications for treating combined municipal and industrial
(primarily paper mill) waste waters. A pilot waste water treatment
plant for each process will b operated in parallel. The effluent
quality, operating parameters, design variables, and cost relation-
ships for each process will be determined. Each pilot plant will
have a 1 to 10 gpm capacity for combined waste waters. After se-
lecting the most promising process, an existing 60 gpm pilot plant
will be modified to suit the selected process and will be operated
for a year to demonstrate its performance and to generate perfor-
mance data. The final objective is to evaluate the design, per-
formance, and use of the systems and to generalize the results for
applicability to other locations.
INQUIRIES : Co,ttgc2 the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
Off Le of Rtoea. h amd Veve.Lop’ tsil
FedetaL Wa..ta PoUwt4on Con.tn.oL Ath,iUtit,ta.tiopt
U.S. Pey eii.t of the Mlex o4
in i . _ Ju
Wa6kin9ton, V. C. 20242
GW/lO-68

-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL6 4he.t d, ejt Lba bit .t ty an R 6 V Gtan.t auw 4ed u.nde.a. Sec. 6, (a)(2)
FedeMZ (Ua.ten. PoLtu.tLon Contn.oe Ae t(CLwt Wateit Re oM .ti Dn Aet}.
GRANTEE : Onondaga County, N.Y.
TITLE OF PROJECT : A Demonstration of Joint Municipal-Industrial Waste
Treatment in the Onondaga Lake Watershed
PROJECT SITE. Dnondaga County, N.Y. PATE AWARVEV : 8 September, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $357,150 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $507,700
PROJECT NUMBER : wP D-66 PP8S NO . 1106
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Onondaga Lake has been a receptor of domestic and industrial wastes
to such an extent that it is now in an advanced stage of eutrophication.
This project is part of a twenty million dollar program to restore
Onondaga Lake.
The objectives of this project are: (1) to demonstrate county-industry
cooperative wastewater management of municipal-industrial wastes based
on an entire watershed, (2) to demonstrate feasibility of treatment
of mixtures of industrial and domestic wastes, (3) to demonstrate the
treatment of an industrial waste stream with the waste effluent from
another industry, (14) to evaluate the effects of proposed nianagement
and treatment methods on the economics of the treatment processes and
on the restoration of the lake.
INQUIRIES : Contact the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O66J ce 06 Re4eaJich . ai4 PeveLop teitt
FedeM2 Wa.te..k. PoLtu.ti.on Cont. .oL Athn ,t’tat4on
U.S. Vt nent 06 the. In eiu .ot
PH IJL _ t 11.11
li,.&hi ,in.tnt. . C. 20242
8168 GR Iq

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4heet de. c.tLbeA b’c.Lt y an R 5 V Gn.a.jtt aLoi, 4. d undvt See. 6, a(2)
Fedeiwl Wa .te.n PothttLon Cont’r.oL Act(Ctwt Wa.tex Re on.a.t on Act).
GRANTEE : City of South St. Paul, Minnesota
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Efficiency and Economy of Polymeric Sewage Clan-
fication t ’
PROJECT SITE : South St. Paul, Mimi. VAlE AWARVEV : June 15, 1 7
FEVERAL GRANT : $Ii.50,000 TOTAL E. T. PROJ. COST : $8L 5 ,159
PROJECT NUMBER ; WPRD 111-01-67 PPES NO . 1106
11060 EKK
VESCRZPT1ON OF PROJECT :
The Demonstration Project includes construction of (1) New Grit Chambers
(14 units) two for industrial wastes, one for sanitary sewage and one for
either industrial or sanitary wastes. These grit chambers will allow
sewage to be treated individually or in combination of the two basic
sewages in the treatment process following grit removal; (2) Mechanical
flash mix-facilities, laboratory and utility building improvements and
the necessary piping and other appurtenant construction. The City will
also construct an interceptor sewer, sludge ejector and pumping station
in conjunction with the demonstration project but is not a part of this
demonstration grant request. The project objectives are to determine the
increased purification attainable by treating industrial wastes (packing
house), sanitary sewage, combined sanitary sewage, and stormwaters or
combinations of such wastes with polyelectrolytes and floc “weighting
•ht
INQUIRIES : Con.tac.t the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O jj!.e o Re4eaxeh a id VeveLopneftt”
8/68 Feden.aL Wate PoL6tJ.on Co,t.t’wt Ad,n nn.a..tJj n
U.S. VtpoXO veit.t o the In e t.z ’t
III 1JL 1
Wa4h.Lngton, V. C. 20242
HGK 3O

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki4 shez de. sc’vibe.o b t eq an R g V Gn.oitt au wtd 4 und it Sec. 6jj
Fedeiw.L Wa te.’t PoUu.ti . .on Conttot Act(Ctean Wa.te)L Re6 toka.t Dn Act).
GRANTEE : City of Hagerstown, Maryland
TITLE OF PROJECT ; A Pretreatment Study on Combined Industrial_MuniciPal
Waste Waters.
Hagerstown Sewage Treatment Plant
PROJECT SITE : HagerstOwn, Maryland PATE AWARIIEV : March 15, 1968
FU)ERAL GRANT : Requested $320,890 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $)427,853
PROJECT NUMBER : WPIRD 1 49-01-67 pp S NO . iio6
11060 EJD
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : This project is to evaluate pre-treatment techniques
for rextile dyeing wastes. The dye wastes are reduced sulfur compounds with
high immediate and ultimate oxygen demand that cannot be satisfied in
en activated sludge system. The pre_treatment technique is to provide initial
oxidation by diffused aeration, chlorination, and the separate additions of
sodium nitrate and potassium permanganate. Ammoniation will also be used.
The project will be for two years and include a waste source investigation,
detailed baseline analyses, construction of the pre-treatment facilities
and full scale paralleling of the treatment system, and evaluation of the
pre-treatment techniques.
INQUIRIES : Con.tac.. Industrial Pollution Control Btanch, DED
O i2e o Re4ea.tch aaid Veveopntnt
FedvtaL Wa.ta PoLLuLL0n Con tJtot Atht n4 at Cn
U.S. Vep me .ivt o the In eM.O’t
HS 8/68 Wa4h Utg, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo oh e2 deAc..tc.be6 bn2c ey an R S V Gtant auwtded u.nden. Sec. 6, a (2)
FedeAa.t Wate.t PoLLu.ti.on CotWtot Act(Ct an WateA Re4tO’cat D t Act)
GRANTEE : City of Grand Forks, N th Dakota
P.O. Box i5i8
Gr id Forks, North Dakota
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Controlled Treatment of Combined Potato Processing-
Municipal Wastes by Anerobic Fermentation, Aerobic
Stabilization Process
PROJECT SiTE : Grand Forks, N.D. PATE AWARVEV : JUL 1 7 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $389, 1478 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $796 9014
PROJECT NUMBER : wP -2o6-ol-m. PPBS NO. 1 106
no6o DJB
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : A full scale 14.5 mgd deinorstration and evaluation
of the joint treatment of municipal sewage in conjunction with potato
processing wastes using several pretreatment methods prior to final treat-
ment in existing stabilizations ponds. The pretreatment methods include
anerobic and aerated treatment, in series, a.nerobic treatment alone, and
aeration alone, under varying seasonal waste load conditions.
In addition to determining the most efficient operation of the pretreat-
ment methods, their effects on the conventional stabilization ponds will
be extensively determined.
INQUTR1ES : Con att the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i2e o Re e *c.k amd Oeuelopneiit
Fedetat Wa.tet Pottu.tJ.on Co,it’tot Athitôt .L t,tat o,t
8/68 U.S. Ve t eiit o the intenLo’t
0 I.J _ L.. U.J
HGK Wa4kütgton, V. C. 20742
3Z

-------
INFORMATION SHEET-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk 4 4hee2 deoc.tibe bt .t Ly an R S V Gkant aw.z ded undex Sec. 6, ‘-i- Ca)
Fede*aL Wa.te.& PoLLuZLon Contwt A .t(CUan (Ua.tex Re .toM.t Dn Act).
GRANTEE : city of Brie
Erie, Penns rlvania
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Joint Treatnient of Domestic Sewage and Pulp
and Paper Mill Industrial Wastes. t ’
PROJECT SiTE : Erie, Pa. PATE AWARVEV : JUN 20 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $88,230 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $333,674
PROJECT NUMBER*,qp j 223 _ O1 _ 66 PPSS NQ . 1106
11060 EOC
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project Is a 20 GPM pilot plant study to determine the
feasibility of combining the treatmentaf normal domestic
sewage and the weak wastes from a neutral sulfite semichemical
pulp and p per mill.
One of the primary parameters of study will be the possible
uptake of sewage neutrients by the treatment with equal volumes
of the neutrient deficient pulping wastes. Full economic and
design factors will, be developed.
INQUIRiES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OWce o Re4ean ch amd VeveZop te.n.t
Fed vial U tex Poltu.tAon Cont&ol Athn nLU. at n
U.S. PepaAfreitt o Ae in2en tct
103 L •1...... tJ.W .
“ 2024!
c :5/68 -.

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL4 hee d e Lbe bU ajt R V Gwvt auxvi .de.d undex Sec.. 6, a(2)
F i .kL72 WateA PoUwt Lo t Con.t’LoZ Ac..t(Cee in ( ctte .’t Re to’ia.. L,, i Ac t).
GRANTEE : CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, ARKANSAS
TITLE OF PROJECT : flljemonstration of a Facility for the Biological
Treatment of Complex Chiorophenolic Wastes.
PROJECT SITE : Jacksonville, Arkansas VATE AWARPEV : May 17, 1968
ERAL GR \NT : $153,569 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $243,313
PROJECT LJM6ER : WPRD 24G-O1 PP8S NO . 1106
VESCRJPTION OF PROJECT :
A full scale (2—4 MGD) demonstration and evaluation of the joint treat-
ment of industrial herbicide and municipal wastes, by the use of a
municipal biological system composed of: primary clarification, bio—filters,
aerated and stabilization ponds. The herbicides are of the chioro and chioro—
oxyacetic acid deriviatives of phenol. Investigations will be conducted
to determine how the concentration of the phenolics in a receiving stream
can be reduced to a level below the tests and odor thresho]ñ, also to in—
vestigate the biological factors related to the removal of the herbicides
during treatment. Suitable methods are to be developed for the ideitification
of the various herbicide Compounds. The adequacy of nutrient values in the
joint waste to allow complete bio—processing of chlorophenolics and related
compounds will a o be demoatrated
INQUIRIES : Con tae.t . Je Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O e o Re e.a’tch a d V ve1opnesvt
FedeMi Wa.teit PoL Lwt on Co,tfjtot AdnL iutt on
U.S. V p .t t te.nt o th In e Lo’
iiJ!J I,J ..wñL,. .. JJ.IJ .
8/68 W h n on, V. C. 20242
GR 3.9

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL& 6hee..t dtc be4 bn.Lt 1y au R S V Gtwt.t a w ded widvt Se . 6 (a2)
FedeMi Wa2ex PoZ2u.ti.on Cont’r.oe Ac.t(CUan Wa.te.’t Reoto’La.tLon Ac. i.
GRANTEE : Harriman utility Board
P. 0. Box 434
Harriman, Tennessee 37748
TITLE OF PROJECT:teTreatment of Combined Sewage and Neutral Sulfite
Setnichemical (NSSC) Pulp and Paper Mill Wastes by High—Rate Biological
_Ejltration and Extended Aeration.tt
PRQJECT SiTE: PATE AWARVEV : Jan. 17, 1969
Harriman, Tennessee
FEVERAL GRANT: TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST :
$238,905 $322,540
PROJECT NUMBER: PPBs NO .
11060 DBF 1106
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Project 0bjectj y . : To investigate the significant factors affecting
the treatment of combined municipal sewage and NSSC pulp and paper mill
wastes by high rate biological filtration and extended aeration,
separately or in combination, and to establish design criteria, operating
parameters and treatment efficiencies.
Grant_Durat : two (2) years
INQUIRIES : Con.tae.t .tI Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DAST
OJr e o Reoeaxck amd VeveLopnestt
F d ML Wa..tvt PoLLu.t on Co WuL AthnnA4tka.t.Lon
U.S. Pepa/ifrent o the 1nte. o4
iOu JJ _ . _ ,1.., . !LU .
1/69 Wa6h4 to?t, V. C. 20242
GRW 3$

-------
INFORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt 4h e,t de. bc a t R V G,uijtt ac wtded undvt. See. 6, (a)(2)
Fede a2 Wcz..tvt PoL& Li n ConPjto.e Ac .t(CU zn Wa..te)t Re o tonaJj pt Ac ).
GRANTEE• Village of Walton
Village Hall
21 North Street
Walton, N.Y. 13856
TiTLE OF ‘ROJECT : “Dynamic Process Development for Biological Treatment
of Whey Bearing Wastes”
PPSOJECT SITE : Walton, New York PATE AWARVEV : Feb 18, 1969
Hastings on the Hudson, N.Y.
FEVERAL GRANT : $52,730 TOT/tL EST. T’P.OJ. COST : $80,O1 7
PiWIECT NWI8ER : 11060 DUJ PPBS NO . 1106
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Efforts of this one year bench and pilot study will be concentrated in
resolving problems associated with biological treatment of wastes from
the manufacture of cheese and associated dairy products. Frequency
response techniques wLll be employed in the development of activated
sludge systems with stable culture separation characteristics. Odor
control techniques will be evaluated in packed tower trickling filter
studies. A selected process will be employed in an on site pilot plant.
1W UlRiE.S : Conta t thc Industrial Pollution Control Branch
o Re vu h awl Veve.top ie.n.t
FedeILaL WaieJL PoI1wtJ. n Cont’Lo.e AGn flL /utt n
U.S. V pait. ne.n.t o .th Znt /t ok
2/69 wuhng.con, V. C. 20242
HGK 3 ( 9

-------
INIORMATION S} ET
b. 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOP NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b Rc3ca xd
This P ject is a Grant , under Section 6, (a 2 )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR : The City of Macon
(Name and Address) City Hall
Macon, Georgia 31201
4
Emo J C. Matthews
Executive Secretary
ard of Water Commissioners
( 0 Third Street - Macon, Georgia 31201
TITLE OF PROJECT : ‘ T Pilot study of Treatment of Combined Municipal and Industrial
Wastes in Selected primary and biological secondary facilities
for the Reduction of Waste Materials Discharged to Receiving
Streams. t ’
PROJECT SITE : Macon, Georgia
PROGRAM (PROJECT) N1J ER : iio6o DPI)
DATE OFFERED : Feb. 3, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):Feb . 19, 1969
or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
)r Contract
Amount
From:
Thru:
$ 171,814.5
$128,883.75
‘
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Project Objectives: The objective of this study is to develop information
relating to the joint treatment of municipal and industrial wastes. The
industrial wastes will be selected wastes from both pulp and paper, and
wood products companies. The study will be accomplished on a pilot plant
basis.
Grant Duration: one year
IN tJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Rescarch and Deve),opment
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, L. t.. O2142
37
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address )
GRW 6Ji

-------
INFORMATION SHEET-I
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLs 4hee2 d c. be b’t. t erj an R V G .an.t at’avtded undvt Sec. 6, (a)(2)
Fed )tae Wa.te.x PoUu2Lon Con.t’toe Aet(C wt Wa.te.t Re. oM..Uon Ac.t).
GRANTEE : City Councq
City of Stockton
Stockton, California
TITLE OF PROJECfl “Upstream Packing House Waste Trea ent Demonstration,
City of Stockton”
PROJECT SITE : Stocktoh, California PATE AWAR1)EV : Feb. 25, 1969
FEVERAL CRAWl : $381,078 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1,085,970
PROJECT ?4LI? (BER : 1106 —DRT PPBS NO . U06
DESCRiPTiON OF P1?.OJECT : A full sqale (2 MGD) development and demonstration
of upstream treatment of packinghouae waste by use of aerobic treatment
in a combination use of high rate activated sludge and in—sewer treatment.
The complex Is anticipated to result in the reduction of BOD load to
the municipal system of 80 percent and demonstrate the utility value of
the conveying sewer line to further treat sewage and to reduce capitol
expenditures over a typical activated sludge plant otherwise required.
It Is Intended to consider the use of the Kehr process for partial
t pstream /treatanent during pilot studies.
iNQUIRiES : CorJ4e the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O u e o Re. seiit h a.r d Veue.topnent
Fede.aa.t Wa.teit Pottwti.opt Cont’tot AcL’, in26tka.tLon
2/6° ( 1.5. Vepifl nestt o the Intei’2ok
-, Jtfl 1..J L...... .‘L L. ILW. .
Waohi.ngton, V. C. 20242
HGK

-------
INFORMATION SI-IEET
RESEARCI-I & DEyELOPMENT GRAN’!’
TIzL6 hee t de jr_Lbe .-.s bici Ly a R L V C/uuz- c” t Ld’Z.d u,zdv S c. 6,
FedeA’ 1 UIa2VL ?o Ltt .’,.o t Co t’ .o . Ac,t(C- eLtiL ( ,tC.’L o .o c, t on Act).
GRJ ITEE: Delaware River Basin Commission
25 Scotch Road - P.O. Box 360
Trenton, New Jersey 6C 3
TiTLE OF PROJECT : peepwater - Pilot Plant - Engineering and Interceptor
Feasibility Study
P O.1ECT SITE : Salem County, N. J. VATE A(’)ARVEV : April 1, 1969
FCVERALGRAUT: 64.6,7 0 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 995,650
PROJECT ?!W CER : 11360 DR PP85 NO . 1106
VESCR1FTIOU OF PROJECT : A pilot plant and engineering study to develop a
jcai_bio1ogicar eatmer1t process for joint industrial mUfliCiP8
wastes, capable of attaining at least 8 to 93 percent removal of major
pollutants. Design, operating and cost information is to be obtained for
1 MGD regi nal treatment complex. To test and. evaluate Advanced
Waste Treatment processes for final effluent polishing. To develop
suitable cost apportionment formulations for the treatment of various
industrial wastes by a joint regional complex operated by an Interstate
Agency. To develop and demonstrate the requirements for organizing,
operating and administering a regional facility by an Interstate Agency.
I?! R1ES : Contact Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J..cc. o Rc e n.ch a.ct V icp a’-
Fe dc&a L (‘Ja tc,t Po a tLoit Cor. t’tot Ac,i .&ti ..4tkc2i .On
U.S. Vz x’ Jt ,ti:2,tt o IntcA J .O)t
633 I tcUruv Av2.. N.(1.
Wa k. L9 on V. C. 20242

-------
PPB 1201
METAL & TAL PRODUCTS
12010
Letters _____________ GR) FN
1343—01 DOT U. of Waterloo—ByerleY A. Printz E. Dulaney
DIN U. of Utah—Miller J. Rouse E. Dulaney
1472—01 UHF Clarkson College of A. Printz E. Dulaney
Tech. —Jellinek
WPRD
41 Chem. Separations Corp. J. Fisher W. Lacy
168 DUL Armco Steel Corp. R. Feder E. Dulaney
169 Armco Steel Corp. R. Feder E. Dulaney
201 EIE Metal Fin.ishers Foundation J. Ciancia E. Dulaney
222 USA S.K. Williams Co. A. Printz E. Dulaney
237 DPF Volco Brass & Copper J. Ciancia E. Dulaney
244 DMF The Beaton & Corbin Co. J. Ciaricia E. Du.laney
270 DFS RAI Research Corp. L. Kahn E. Dulaney
208 DRE Interlake Steel Corp. A. ?rintz E. Du.laney
DNF CF&I Steel Corp. F. Pfeffer E. Dulaney
DRH Minnesota Pollution Control A. Printz E. Dulaney
Agency
EDY Am. Iron & Steel Inst. F. Pfeffer E. Dulaney
DTQ Weirton Steel E. Dulaney
X F Alabama Water Improvement E. Loiriasney E. Dulaney
Conunis sion
4’

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR BLAST FURNACES & STEEL MILLS
PPB 1201: Metals & Metal Products
Hudson Champlal
I
[ Puerto Rico J Virgin I
I c,I
and j
V. S. ef I w
f.d,,bI W,t,, g
Centi
.4
u hanna

-------
INFI i ATION SI) EET —
RESEARCI I & DEVELO PMENT CRAN I’
iL; Iit’..e dc scJLiJc./ b’t L’. ty ut T C 1 G’ 1 tuit tRWLC ZC( unrJc.J Sec.. 5,Researeh,
ftd iL * t J p f 2oit Co; : .’w A (C cui ( a tcJL R f o/ta.ti o t Ac t).
G; / [ iEC: University of Waterloo
Dr. John 3. Byerley
ruui.cprr O Fc ; Detoxi,CatiOfl of Cyanide Wastes by ElectrooXidatiOn
P O.7ECT SITE : Waterloo, Ontario VI TE / L ,’ RDFV : November 26, 1968
TOflJ.. EST. P O3. CO.ST : $2I ,OI 7
r. ’O3LCi__1. l E1 : wp-13I 3-O1 PP3S NO . 1201
1201 DOT
V .SCI ”LO ! or T O3 CI The objective of this project is to develop an
process for destroying cyanide ion
in dilute cyanide wastes. This process is to be:
a) Capable of purifying large volumes of cyanide wastes by reducing
cyanide ion conc\entratiOfl to less than 1 ppm.
b) Suited to operation by semi- ki11ed personnel in ma11 scale
operations.
c) Adaptable to conlinuouS or semi-Continuous operation.
7è )Llui IFS: Co .z t” he. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ie o6 e4e.a’ .c.h a d v Lop1eJt.t
F L(cML W e/L PoUu &o,t Contto L Ac iivL6t.’utUon
us. V ie. v 06 .the. Iiv c.’ 2.o’L
I 1JLJ .i- .. .... . .... IJ.IIt
I W t4h .n o 1 1 9 P. C. 20242
ELD/ll/68 4

-------
INFORMATION SI [ EET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TI A he.c,t deAc,t’be4 b.&. t y an R S V Gwt a .n.de4 und it See. 5, Research
Fc.dt .a2 Wa Wt PoL&i..ti.on ContAoL Act(CL .an Wa.t Re o&atLon Act).
GRAVTEE University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dr. Jan D. Miller
TiTLE OF PIZOJECT : Depression of Pyrite in Sulfide Flotation Systems
Without the use of Cyanide
PROJECT SITE : Salt Lake City, Utah VATE AWARVEV : January 29, 1969
FEVER /ti GRAWT : $12,663.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $13,559.00
PROJECT NL’MBER : 12010 DIM PPSS NO . 1201
Date Effective : January 1, 1969
PESCR1PTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of this project is to develop a technique for the depression
of pyrites in the froth flotation of sulfide ores by the addition of organic
salts in place of commonly used cyanides. The oxidation potential of pure
systems will be varied to determine explicitly the conditions which must be
imposed to depress pyrites. Batch flotation tests on two tiatural sulfide
ores containing pyrite will then be conducted to determine the feasibility of
pyrite depression in a natural system under conditions prescribed for the pure
system.
IQ,UJRIES : Con.tac.t the Industri 1 Pollution Control Branch
O j..ce o’ R seixn. h a,td Vev Lopiteii.t
FedeMi Wa. te.& PoUu.t on Cont’wL A ,t ii t’utc o,t
U.S. Vepa.kt wit.t o the 1r eitJ.ort
1J J
RN 11/68 WaahJ.n ton, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki o 4ke,2 de4c1ti..b 4 b .* ty an R S P Gitan.t azmzAded wtdei Ste. 5, (Research)
Fedeiwi Wa.tvt PoUwtion onfJtot Act(Ctta.n Watpjt Reo ongt.on Ac..tl.
GRANTEE : Clarkson College of Technology
Potsdam, New York 13676
Dr. H.H.G. Jellinek
TITLE OF PROJECT : Metal Removal/Recovery from Polluted Water by
Complexation with Linear Polyelectroly-tes
PROJECT SITE : Potsdam, New York PATE AUJARVEP : February 13, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : 211.,328.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST ; $27,6L1.5.Oa
PROJECT NUMBER : 12010 DHP PPBS NO . 1201
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT: Project Period : March 1, 1969—Feb. 28,197C
The complexation of metal ions with polyacids to form water soluble
complexes and subsequent precipitation with polybases will be
investigated. Metals are to be recovered by destroying the complex
at low pH. Reuse of the polyelectrolyte will be investigated. The
objective of the project will be to demonstrate that the above described
technique is an economically and technically feasible method of treating
wastewaters containing widely varying metal concentrations.
This grant is for the first year of grantee’s anticipated three year
project.
INQUIRIES : Contact Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ice o Re4 a .ck amd Dtve.Zop teitt
FedtMl Wa tek PoLLu.t ort Contitot Aa niJti.4tjwfjon
U.S. Pe. n.b,ejit o the IntejtJj it
_ IJ.I _ . --.--, -
ELD/12/68 4itAiigton, V. C. 2024?
4S

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thi4 4h e de4c,t .bes b, A.& tq a,t R S P G.altt auv ded w id e / i. See. 6LI,)
Fede/cAL WateA PoUu.tLo,t Conttot Ac. fCtwt CtJa.te.n. Re6 .to’ca.t .2on Ac t).
GRANTEE ; Chemical Separations Corporation
Bus Terminal Road
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37 3O
TITLE OF PROJECT : Acid Pickle Liquor Wastes Treatment Utilizing Advanced
Ion Exchange Techniques
PROJECT SiTE : Oak Ridge, Tennessee DATE AWARVEP : December 20, 1967
FEDERAL GRANT : $50,400.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $72,000.00
PROJECT NUMBER : 4PRD 4 1(Rl)_01_6 pp NO . 1201
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
The purpose of this gr .nt is to determine the feasibility of using con-
tinuous ion exchange to strip Fe from pickling wastes and regenerate
the acid for reuse. The iron will be converted to a high grade Fe 2 03
for use in metallurgical processing as by-product.
Project Period: 15 months
INQUIRIES : Co.tt e.t the Industriçil Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i.ce o Rrnan .ch. aaid Peuelopnestt
ELD 8/6 FedenaL W e.t PoUat on Contn.ot MjnhJt4httD.tion
U.S. D4a. teatt o £he iivte’r..wn
Jfl L.J Z _ _ .1 ...... IJ,-W.-
W6h ngtQn, P. C. 2024t
1I

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——I
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENTS GRANT
TkLS 4hee t de t .beA b 4.t ey an R S V G’ta,Lt auw&ded undeA See. 6b
FedeAaL Wa .tvt PoLtwti. on Co Wr.ot Ac.t(Ctean Watvt Re o’w tLon
GRANTEE : Steel Corporation
Middletown, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Treatment of Acid Rinse Waters”
PROJECT S 1TE:Middletowñ , Ohio PATE AWARVEV: , May 16, 196
FEDERAL GRANT : $547,500 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$1,784,Boo
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 168-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201
120]fl DUL
PROJECT PERIOD : Nov. 1, 1967 to
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : Oct. 31, 1969
The project provides for construction, operation, tests, and reports
on facilities to treat 1500 gpm of acid rinse waters produced by the
hydrochloric acid pickling of strip-steel preparatory to cold-rolling.
The treatment process will consist of limestone neutralization,
aeration, coagulation, sedimentation, sludge recirculation, vacuum
liltration of the excess sludge, and effluent equalization.
All or nearly all of the acid and the compounds of iron will be
removed by the treatment process. The chloride content of the waste
is not changed by tI is process and may be such that dilution with
other available wastes will be required in order to meet the state?s
proposed standards regarding total dissolved solids.
INQUIRiES : Con. a t .thtlndustrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O 4r..e o R 4eM.eh ajid VweZop’ esu
Fe4e’ia.L Waek PoUzi.t4on Con.ttoL Athnàv 4tka.t.Lon
U.S. Vepa. . en.t o the Inte.t .o’t
133 JA i i .ti*. !I.h .
Wa4hütgton, V. C. 20242
ED/Feb.’68 47

-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki 4hu.t de cALb bnit Ly au R S V Gxauvt a vtd z4 LLnde Sec. oiL ,)
Fede ta2 Wa te/t PothLtion ContAot Act(CLeau Wa te..’t Re4tokatLon Act).
GRANTEE : Armco Steel Corporation
Middletown, Ohio
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Waste Water - Waste Oil Mixtures
PROJECT SITE : Ashland, Kentucky VATE AWARVEP : Ma r 16, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : 4 2O9,OOO TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 1,54l,72O
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 169-01-68 PP8S NO . 1201
VESCRTPTTON OF PROJECT: PROJECT PERIOD : Nov. 1, 1967 to Oct. 31,196
This project provides for design, operation, studies, and reports on
a full scale demonstration facility to be built by Armco for the treat-
ment of 4.6 mgd of oil-water emulsion wastes from a five-stand cold-
rolling mill. A five chemical treatment method of coagulation, floc-
culation, dissolved air flotation for oil—water separation, and sludge
incineration i. iii be used. The project schedule provides one year for
construction and one year for operating studies of parameters and re-
porting of results.
INQUIRIES : Con.tae..t ke Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DEL)
o Reowuth awl V ueLop en.t
Fedvto2 Wu2eIz. PoLLwUon Co,vtkot Aththv4tkation
U.S. Vepatthie tt o th In.te.xLo’L
W . .L. !i.W .
Wa4h .fl9to t, V. C. 20242
ELD/Feb 68

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu 4h e..t de4c..tthe . btLt ty an R S V G aivt auwLde4 uiideit StL . 6(b),
Fede.ta L Wate..’L Pof.2ufJ..on Con.t’toe Act(Clean Wa te.k Re.4to’w.tiLon Act).
GRANTEE : Metal Fini hers’ Foundation
Upper Montclair, New Jersey
TITLE OF PROJECT : “An Investigation of Techniques for the Removal of
Chromium and Cyanides from Electroplating Wastes.Tt
PROJECT SiTE : Upper Montclair, N.J.VATE AWARVEV March 27, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $98,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COSTS $145,000
PROJECT NUMBER:WPRD 201-01-68 PP&S NO . 1201 DURATION : 2 years
VESCRIPTTON OF 12010 EIE PROJECT PERIOD : March 1, 1968
The Metal FinishersT Foundation will conduct a two-phase research
and demonstration project on methods for economically treating cyanide
and chromium wastes from small plating shops. Phase I will include
(a) a “State of the Art” review of recovery techniques, (b) accumu-
lation of data on waste stream compositions, (c) selection of tech-
niques for bench scale study and selection of extractants and coinpiexing
agents, (d) bencha ale experimental investigation of selected techniques
and (e) evaluation of the test results and preparation of recommendation-
This phase will require one year.
Phase II will consist of (a) the design of theprocess and the processing
equipment, (b) acquisition and installation of thea uipment fn an elec-
troplating plant, (c) operation of the demonstration plant to accumulate
data, and (d) the evaluation of the data and preparation of reports.
The work will be performed by subcontract to the Battelle Memorial Institute
at Columbus, Ohio. Various treatment methods; including liquid—liquid ex-
traction, ion flotation, and precipitate flotation; will be investigated and
compared.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ii e o Re4ea/r ch ajid VeveLop eivt
Fede.taL Watut PoLtu.t on Contn.ot Adnt’cat on
U.S. Vepait tment o the mnteiii.o’t
1113 1.J _ ....... ..... U.&i
ELD:2/68 Wa4hLn ton,V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SIIEET
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkIA 4hect de sc beA b&Lt Lq wt R V Gn.a tt a vi.ded undVL Ste. 6 (b),
Fe.d &aL Wa teA PoUu t i on Co,ttkoZ AcL(Ct an Wa/vt Re4 o’ta!-iOPl Act).
GRANTEE : S. K. Williams Company
2370 N 32nd Street
Milwaukee, WisCOflSifl 53210
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Electroplating Waste Treatment and Water Reuse”
PROJECT SITE : Milwaukee, WiscóflSiflATE AWARVEV : July 17, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $87,750 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $157,306.80
PROJECT MLIN8ER : WPRD222 —0l-R1 68 PP8S NO . 1201
12010 DSA
R0JECT PERIOD: Jul. 17, 1968 to Mar. 17,1970
SCR!PTTON OF PROJECT : The S. K. Williams Company proposes to in—
stall a chemical pre-rinse type waste treatment plant (designed
by La.ncy Laboratories) to treat the drag-Out from various op-
erations in their new job-plating plant. Each section of the
waste treatment facility will be expected to alternately or
simultaneously treat the wastes from three to seven different
proce&8ifl operations. Sludges will be disposed of by landfill
and 80-90% of the rinse waters will be reused. The blowdOwfl
rinse waters will be free of significant quantities of tèxic
substances.
The project period will be 8 months for construCtiOn and 12
months for operation, maintenance, and post construCtiOn
studies and reports.
TNQUTRTES : Co,ttar_ the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O Lce o Re sez1/tek a,td Veve2op tvt.t
FedvLaL Watut PoLLzzJ_i..on Contk.ot AcL’ne,t.L6tka.tLOft
U.S. Vepa& ic.it.t o the I,ttCXW’L
iii 1.JL. ..— Lj.,. t1,-Ii - .
KLD/ 6 — 68 i üigto t, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo 4hee t dec.nibcA b’t t ty an R S V Gita,vt aiavided undvv. Sec. 6 (b)
Fedt.taL (& .teit Pottu.ti.on Co ,ttAot Act(CLeait (Uaie/t RedtoMJ.40n Act).
GRANTEE : Volco Brass and Copper Company
Kenilworth, New Jersey 07033
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Treatment Recovery, and Reuse of Copper Wire Mill
Pickling Wastes.”
PROJECT SITE : Kenilworth, N. J. PATE AWARVEV : June 28, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $124,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $177,159
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 237-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201
12010 DPF PROJECT PERIOD : June 28, 1968 to
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Volco Brass and Copper Compaz 1 ?dc ?5 TPD
of copper and copper alloy wire. Wastes from the pickling, bright dipping,
and drawing operations consist of spent treating solution dumps, drag—
out, and rise waters containing acids; alkalies; and hexavalent chromium,
copper,fluoride, and copper conpiexing ainmonium ions. Lancy Laboratories
has designed a process and waste treatment system which will recover the
copper electrolytically, will regenerate the treating solutions, and will
permit reuse of 954% of the waste water as process water. The process
is free of any significant sludge disposal problem. The project is to
be completed in one year.
INQUIRZES : Co,itgct the Inc 1 ustrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWc. o Re eaAck a. d V veLop iui
FedeML a.ten. PoLtu.tJ.on Con ot Athn ü ôtka.tton
ELD 5/68 U.S. Vepc.n.bw.nt o the Inteit.to*
ifi E _ .
Wa. hLn ton, V. C. 2024!

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkIA 4hcet dc .&cx4be.o b.n. Ltgy a,t R 5 V G .ait.t au.xk4ed undeir. Sec. 6(b),
Feden o2 Wa2e..t PoUwt on Contn.oe (iia.tvx. Re4to’t&t.Lon Act).
GRANTEE : The Beaton and Corbin Mfg. Co.
Southington, Connecticut
TITLE OF PROJECT : Chemical Treatment of Plating Waste for Elimination
of Chromium, Nickel andMetallorls
PROJECT SiTE : Southington, Conn. VATE AWARVEV :
June 3 , 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $37,250 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $58,2?O
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 244-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201
12010 DNF
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:ThIS is an industrial waste treatment project
for the installation and demonstration of a chemical pre-rinse
system fo the removal of toxic materials from the wastes from a
small electroplating plant. The treated effluent is expected to
have a pH of 6.5 to 8.5 and will contain less than: 0.1 ppm of
chromium, copper, nickel, or zinc; 100 ppm of chlorides or nitrates;
200 ppm of sulfates; 5 ppm of BOD; and will be color and odor free.
Approximately two-thirds of the treated effluent will be reused for
plating rinse water.
Precipitates of toxic metal ions will be produced by the chemical
treatment of the segregated waste streams from the various plating
lines. Sludges containing these precipitates will be routed to
sludge drying beds. Dried sludges will be disposed of by landfill.
There a e over three thousand similar sources of stream pollution
in the New England area alone and over twelve thousand plating
plants across the nation. This project will provide technical and
economic data on an effective waste treatment method. It is antici-
pated that this information will be of value to many firms, who be-
cause of insufficient funds, could not themselves undertake the
engineering and development costs required.
PROJECT PERIOD : June 3, 1968 to February 3, 1970
INQUIR1ES : Con.taei tht Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW. o Re4ean.ek amd Veve1op ten
FedvLaL (ila.te/t PoUat on Con titot Athn ni tjtat a n
U.S. Vepa4bieLt o the intelu.ok
Ju J .J ..... - -
Wa6kLngton, V. C. 2024?
ELD 4/68

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü ohee2 de.4c.tiJ,eo 6n t Ly an R S V G ajtt auw .ded unde Sec. 6(b),
Fed M2 t ji PoLLu tLon Contjtoe Ac. t(CLean Wa. vt Re4 ofla on Ac -ti.
GRANTEE : RAI Research Corp.
36-40 37th Street
Long Island City, N.Y. 11101
TITLE OF PROJECT:’t reatment of Cyanide Rinse Waters by E1ectrodia1ysis T
PROJECT SiTE : Long Island City, N.Y RATE AWARVEV : NOV. II, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $58,685 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $83,835
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD.L270_O1...68 PPBS NO . 1201
12010 DFS PROJECT PERIOD:Nov . 11, 196g.-Jul. 11, 19tD
VESCRIPT 1O 1 OF PROJECT:mjs project provides for a laboratory study
of the apblication’of electrodialysis to the treatment of a cyanide
solution which simulates the rinse water from a copper “strike”
electroplating operation. The objective is to develop design para-
meters and to define economic factors as a basis for a later demon-
stration program with an industrial plating firm. The project period
will be eight months.
INQUIRIES : CoDLt4 the Industrial Pollution. Control Branch, DED
OW ce o Re4ea ch. amd VtveLop eitC
Fedeto Wa.ten PoLZut on Con.titot Ath wtc tka.tion
U.S. De .tO,,eitt o the InZeivJ oit
SlJiJ I1.L . L.L tLW, .
ELD/6-68 Wahkütgton,V; C. 2024?

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü & tee t de . c..tc.be.6 b Lt ty an R S V G i.a,t.t a wtd d undt Ste. 6 (b),
Fed VLaL Wa..tvt PoLLu.t4 o t Co u’Jtot Ac.t(Ctea.st WaWt Re. on-cJJ_on Act).
GRANTEE : Inter].ake Steel Corporation
310 South Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 606011
TITLE OF PROJECT : Pollution Control of Blast Furnace Gas Washer
Through Recirculation
PROJECT SITE : Chicago, Illinois VATE AWARVEV : January 27, 1969
FEVERAL. GRANT : $175,200. TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$525, 6 00.
PROJECT NL(M8ER : pRD 208-01-68 PPBS NO . 1201
12010 DRE
VESCRTPT1ON OF PROJECT : The full scale demonstration project will provide
additional facilities for the treatment end reuse of 7.2 rngd of blast fur-
nace gas washer water from the venturies and coolers on tvo blast furnaces.
The water before treatment contains 700 ppm of suspended solids, 1630 ppm
of total solids, 3ppm cyanidee, aM 100 ppb of phenols. An ani9mic po]j-
electrolyte viii be used to improve recovery of magnetite (Fe3 0 ) and re-
moval of cyanide a in the primary clarifier. In addition, polyphospbates
and chlorine vi].l be JiBed as required to prevent a hydrogen cyanide hazard
in the vacinity of the cooling tower. A new cooling tower will reduce the
water temperature and further reduce cyanides thus permitting reuse of most
of the water. The cooling tower blovdo ni will be used to cool slag. The
blovdovn stream will be evaporated and leave its dissolved solids on the
slag pile. The blowdown rate viii be determined by the allowable alkal inity
of the recirculated water. The water is passed through cooling coils in
the vall3 of the blast furnaces before routing through the venturies. Thia
is expected to limit the alkAlinity to 500 ppm.
The project period o ’ 18 months is based on anticipated completion of con-
struction in July 1969 aM Final Report by August 1, 1970.
INQUIRIES : Con.tac.t tht Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DKD
O A e o Re. eaxth a*d VeveLop tvtt
FedeAal Wate..’L PoLLu.tLon Coptttot Athn n4.4tka.tLoPI
. : -4,w .
..D 11/68 Wa6hiJlgton, V. C. 2024?
64

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkts 4hee.t de c, A .be b.’ut y an R £ P Gn.a, t aiavLded undVL Sec. 6(b)
Fede,&aL Wa tvr. PoUwtLon Con .tjtoZ Act(Ctea.n (Ua. .te’ Reotoka.t.A.on Act).
GRANTEE : CF&I Steel Corporation
P. 0. Box 1920
Denver, Colorado 80201
TITLE OF PROJECT : Research Study of Coal Preparation Plant and By Product
Coke Plant Effluents
PROJECT SiTE : Pueblo, Colorado PATE AWA VED : MAR 2 71969
FEVERAL GRANT : $86,500.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $205,000.00
PROJECT NLJM8ER : 12010 DNF J’P8S NO . 1201
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project will provide for (a) a study of waste sources, volunines, and
characteristics, (b) laboratory and bench scale studies of alternate treat-
ment processes, and (c) a study of additions to planned coal washery
filtration faci1it es to develop reuse possibilities of non-coking solids
and solids waste disposal. Development of methods for waste water treat-
ment to produce effluents suitable for reuse or discharge in accordance
with state stream standards will be a major objective.
The project period is seven months.
INQUIRIES : Con.tacJ the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i.e.e O 4ea.tch ap4 Vevelopneitt
Wa2en. PoUwt ,,n Con.tn.oL Athn n26tka.tLon
U.S.VLtO,eQJtt o the Iri.te,vjj4
W4h1.n9ton, P. C. 20242
ELD 2/69 55

-------
INFORMATION ShEET —
RESEAR I-I & DEVELOPMENT GRAN’I’
ikJj he.c da .sc. Lie.o an R V C cuz.t a’.’. vtd d uad . Szc.. 6 b,
Fed e/u ( ‘a .tv Po Uw _io;t Co tw E. Ac.-t(C- ea,L -te ’L P e o 5on Ac -t).
GRAH7EE: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
717 De]aware Street, Southeast
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
TItLE OF )IWJECT: “Study of Reverse Osmosis for Treating Metal
Finishing Effluents”
P OJEçT_SITE: Minneapolis, Minnescta VATE AC’JARVEV : June 30, 1969
FEVERALGff: $49,737.00 TOT L EST. PROJ. COST : $71,053.00
PROJECT ?!.V ER : i oio DRH rS_ . 1201
VESCR1?TIO?! OF PWJECT : The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency proposes
to engage the North Star Research and Development Institute (3100 Thirty
Eighth Ave., So., Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55406) to conduct Phase I of an
anticipated three phase — three year project. The objectives of the pro-
ject are to develop reverse osmosis (RO)’ for the treatment of metal finish-
ing effluents (FIFE) for the purposes of (a) eliminating pollutants from
effluents, (b) recovery of valuable plating materials, and (c) recovery of
waste waters for reuse.
Phtse I will provide for screening of candidate membranes for effectiveness
anc. compatibility in single ion applications, compatibility of support
materials, investigation of promising membranes-f or improvement by modifi-
cation, and investigation of operating parameters, e.g. temperature, pressure,
thickness, strength, and permeability.
Phase II would extend the studies to mixed ion FIFE’s, life studies, and
production aspects and costs of membranes.
Phase III would consist of scale—up studies on simulated FIFE’s arid sub-
sequently to actual FIFE’s with generation of data for commercialization.
JflQUIRIES: Con tac the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ij’e. o Rc caiicii a2d Vg.veioieit
Fedc’ Wa-te,t Pollwti.oii COrJJLCZ Ath,tt. twJ on
(1.5. V pct tnvu o the. l , oi
633 1ndJ tna Avz. H. J.
ELD 4/68 Ct’a4k ng to t, V. C. 20242

-------
Ti’ ’)RMI TION SREET
May 27. 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ ReJca ;rd
Th Pt’ jeci is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
American Iron & Steel Institute
150 East Le2nd Street
New York, New York 10017
John E. Barker
Manager, Pollution Control
Armco Steel Corporation
Middletown, Ohio L45042
“Biological Removal of Carbon and Nitrogen Compounds
from Coke Plant Wastes”
The Armco Steel Corporation, under the sponsorship of the AISI and with the
assistance of the AISI Fellowship at Mellon Institute will design, construct,
operate, optimize, and evaluate a 1 gpm pilot facility for the three stage
biological treatment of raw ammoniacal liquors from the by—product coke plant
of Armco Steel located at Houston, Texas. A typical analysis of this waste
would indicate l2L 0 ppm of phenol, 60 ppm cyanide, and 6L400 ppm ammonia.
The three stage biological treatment system is designed to accomplish (a)
oxidation of carbonaceous material (aerobic), (b) nitrification of nitrogenons
compounds (aerobic) and Cc) nitrate reduction to nitrogen gas (anaerobic).
Laboratory testing indicates that removal of 75% of organic carbon, 99% of
phenol and cyanide and essentially all of the ammonia can be expected. The
pilot facility will provide the basis for the design of a full scale facility.
I1’JQJJIRIES:
ELD 5/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research arid Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2 42
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
TITLi OF PROJECT:
PROJECT SITE :
Houston, Texas
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NuMBER : 12010 EDY
DATE OFFERED :
May 21, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):June 25, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
WPCA G nt
)r Contr t
Amount
. 1 ’rom:
,
Thru:
$156,000
$109,200

-------
Ti’!. Oi MATION SHEET
Datc tr k cJcw (I
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Adaress)
TITLI QF PROJECT : Combined Steel Mill and Municipal Wastewaters Treatment
PROJECT SITE : Weirton, West Virginia
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12010 DTQ,
DATE OFFERED:
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
F TPCA G nt
)r Contr. ct
.Arrount
From:
Thru:
$ 163,963
$ 95 1b
DE3CRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This grant supports Phase I of grantee t s anticipated three phase project to
provide an overall waste treatment system to treat effluents from an integrated
steel mill and the domestic wastes from the City of Weirton, West Va. The
mill produces the full spectrum of steel industry wastes. Waste water volumes
currently are 226 mgd and 1.2 mgd from the mill and the city respectively.
The general approach will be to reduce volumes by providing treatment to
maximize reuse, to provide pretreatment as required for subsequent combined
treatment, toprovide combined treatment of sanitary and specific mill wastes
where a sy-nergestic effect can be anticipated, in an expanded municipal facility,
and to provide complete treatment of the remaining wastes.
Phase I consist$ of three tasks which include wastewater characterization and
analysis of existing facilities, accessment of alternative treatment processes,
and determination of the feasibility of a joint municipal-industrial waste
treatment demonstration facility. Phase I will require twelve months to comp]ete.
INQ IJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Mministration
U. S. ‘Departnient of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202 42
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Thi - PcDjccl is a Class v Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Wat r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRJUITEE OR c * 93f OPO ; Weirton Steel Division
(Name and Address) National Steel Corporation
Box -i -3l
Weirton, West Virginia 26062
________________ William M. Smith
Manager, Industrial Hygiene Engineering
Weirton Steel Division
4
ELD I6 /69

-------
T t Oi(MATION SFEEET
Date to b W’1ca d
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMBNT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Th ?c3ject is a Class V , under Section 6(b) of the
Fedcral Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
Alabama Water Improvement Commission
State Office Building
Montgomery, Alabama 361OLi.
R.E. Lacey, Head, Membrane Processes Section
Southern Research Institute
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
Electrornembrane Process for Regenerating Acid from
Spent Pickle Liquor
Birmingham, Alabama
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project pravides for the experimental investigation of an electromembrane
process for the recovery of sulfuric acid and iron or iron oDdde from spent
sulfuric acid pickling liquors. The investigation will determine the technic
feasibility of the process in a bench scale operation, provide engineering
data for the design of larger recovery units, and develop engineering cost
estimates to indicate the economic feasibility of the process. The bench
scale studies will be directed at development of the configuration, mode, and
conditions of operation required to minimize power requirements.
IN tJIRIES:
BiD 8/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Feder l Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2 42
5 3
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Acidress)
TITLr OF PROJECT:
PROJECT SITE :
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12010 BX F
DATE OFFERED;
DATE ACCEPTED (AwAI DED :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Grant
Period Costs
) Contract
Ax ount
from: One
Year
Thru:
$30,000
$ 20,000

-------
LOCATION OF PRIMARY ALUI4INUM & ELECTROMETALLURGICAL PROL)UUT ?LANT $
PPB J201: Metals & Metal Products
ng a d
Estuary
Susquehanna
Jur. 9&7
U. S. D -.eit o the I ! q
Watt, A— j. on
Hudson Champla
I
Puerto P 1 ICOI) Virgin
[ !s!anc j

-------
PPB 1202
CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTS
12020
Letters To GPO PM
WPD
WPRD
2148 DJI B. F. Goodrich Chem. Co. G. Horowitz G. Rey
DIS Union Corbide Corp. J. Ferguson G. Rey
DQC Dept. Commerce & Indus- J. Horn G. Rey
try State of Louisiana
DJJ Lakeway Chem. Co. A. Printz G. Rey
EEQ Dow Chemical Co. J. Horn G. Rey
EAW E. I. DuPont J. Ulshoefer G. Rey
EAS Dow Chemical Co. G. Rey
EGM Farmers Chemical Co. E. Lornasney 0. Rey
Contracts
1LL_12_LI 35 C. W. Rice & Co. F. Stein G. Rey
EID Engineering Science, G. Putnicki G. Rey
Inc.
‘I

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR INO1 ANIC C} [ EMICAL INDUSTRIES
PPB 1202: Chemicals & Aflied Products
Hudson Champ!ai
England
Central
‘ S .
Wc stcrn
c1117 I
[ uertoRi 2j Virgin
c,I
I slmidsj
F
Estuary
a
June 37
V. S. Deojrpn’ c “e
Fete,aI Wil,, Pu . o C “ -o•

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR ORGANIC CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
PPB 1202: Chemicals & Allied Products
I nc
Jun , 19G7
U. D p, .t—’. c•
.de.I W’!e’ Po , c - C--- - 4:— -, y-j•
3 : .De!aware Estuary
ia ke Susqueharma
;c - • - .,
i r i
Pucr o r; j

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLe &hett deoc.&4.beA b&Lt çLq a R S V Gta,tt au ded u,tdert See. 6,
Fq4ejta.t Watt ’t. Po!Jjs2Jj n COnIJLOe Ac.t(CLea.n Wa.te/L Re6tolzg.t2on Act).
GRAWIEE : B. F. Goodrich Chemical Company
3135 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
TITLE OF PROJECT : Waste Treatment Facilities for Poly Vinyl Chloride
Manufacturing Plant
PROJECT SITE : Salem County, N. J. DATE AWARVEP : JUL 2 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : 364,9Qo TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 823,1oo
PROJECT NUMBER : PRD 248-01 -68 PPBS NO . 1202
12020 DJI
VE. CR1PTION OF PROJECT : A development, demonstration, and evaluation
project for the bio-cheinical treatment of wastewatera from a typical
poiy vinyl chloride manufacturing plant, at a 0.85 ingd scale of operation.
The treatment system is to produce effluent to meet the receiving water
standards (Delaware River) of greater than 85% removal of BOD, turbidity
of not greater than 30 units above river water, and be free from taste
and odor producing substances.
The process will consist of chemical pre—treatment with primary sedi-
inentation, followed by activated sludge secondary treatment and a final
polishing pond. Tertiary treatment studies with activated carbon are
also contemplated to determine the extent to which the secondary effluent
will lend itself to tertiary treatment, as future Delaware River standards
may require the equivalent of tertiary treatment.
INQUIRIES : Coftt.a .t At Indi strial Pollution Control Branch
O i e o Raea tck aasd Vevth,pnestt
FedeIIAZ Wt,2eit. Pottwtj.on Contitot Athn’stLotitatLon
U.S. Vepan eitt o the Inte.t tok
633 Ind a Ave. N.W.
Wa4kiLngton, V. C. 2024t
( 4’

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkA4 4hte..t d c.&Lba bn . t ty an R S V G’ta.nt awtvtded undut Ste. 6,
FedtML Wa.te.s. PoIJuti.o i Contitoe Ac. (CLean Wa.tVL Re o’w2. on Ac..t).
GRAW1EE : Union carbide Corp.
R&D Departme t
Bound Brook, New Jersey 08805
TITLE OF PROJECT : Anaerobic Treatment of Synthetic Organic Wastes
PROJECT SlTESouth Qiarleston, W.Va.VATE ALVARVEV : December 11, 1968
FEVERAL GRMT : $220,400 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $314,859
PROJECT NUMBER : 1202-DIS PPBS NO . 1202
DESCRIPTION OF PROJEàT:To determine the technical and economic
feasibility of an anaerobic-aerobic process for the treatment
of con osit organic chemical waste; from a complete petro-
chemical complex. Optimum results will be demonstrated on a
5000 gpd scale treatment facility to obtain design data and
establish operating criteria for larger scale installations.
The demonstration will be conducted subject to a technical an
economic feasibility study based on laboratory scale research
studies. The project will be for a two year period and will
be initiated at the Union carbide Technical Center at South
tharleston, West Virginia.
INQUIRTESz Cc.itac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW .re 06 Re. ea* k aisd VeueLopnen.t
FedeML Wa.te.n Pot2u.ti.on CotttwZ Ac6niALotkat2oii
U.S. Pep a.beeAt 06 the lnteA4o4
ill .‘LL. tLL
W 6kin to*, P. C. 2024?

-------
INFORMATION SHEET—-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Th24 4he e dec. b b4i..e. . ty an R 5 V G w.n .t a Aded uitdvt See. 6
Fed ,tc2 Wc teit PoLtwti.on Con.t’Loe Ac. t(CUait OJ vWt Re o’ta,t2on Ac.t).
GRAWTEE : Department of Commerce and Industry
State of Louisiana
TITLE OF PROJECT : Evaluation of Polymeric Materials for the Treatment
and Recovery of Petrochemical Wastes.
PROJECT SITE : Baton Rouge, La. VAlE ACUARVEV : April 16, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $1i 8,295 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,992
PROJECT NUJi73EP . : 12020 - bQ.C PPBS NO . 1202
VESCR 1PTJON OF PROJECT :
Evaluation, of recently developed reverse osmosis membranes for application
to in-plant chemical waste streams, under laboratory and field conditions.
Various selected membranes and petrochemical in-plant waste streams will be
examined in a high velocity test circuit to obtain engineering and economic
data, to provide guidelines for the application of reverse osmosis to
various selected in-plant waste s reazns to reduce net organic loads by
recovering their product values.
IWQ UIRIES : Co tto. ht Industrial Pollution Control Branch
o Re.. ax h a d Ve.ve2op ie.n.t
Fede. Wa.WL Po!J .Ltt on ConJJtoL Athnijt . 4tka .&on
U.S. V txvtrn ivt 06 the Tn. vi .i .o’L
(Qa4Itht ton, V. C. 20242
6

-------
INFORMATION ShEET
RESEARCi-I & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt she c1e. c. t be4 Lm_L Ly an R V G tui t a vLd d und?. t S . 6,
Fede.JwL (C z tvi. PoUwUon Cont’to.& Ac (C- e.a,: tte/L Ro s.to’tc tLon Act).
GRA ITEE : Lakeway Chemicals, tnc.
Muskegon, Michigan
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Demonstration Project for Prevention of Pollution
of Water by Chlorides”
PROJECT SITE : Muskegon, Michigan PATE AC’)AIcVEV : April 16, 1969
FEVE AL GR 1 t”,T : $99,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $212,600
PROJECT ?!W E1? : 12020-DJJ pp ,j 1202
VESCPJVI 10 ’J O P2OJECT :
A full scale (9000 gallons/dag) demonstration of an acid fractionation
process for the treatment of strong numeral waste acids for the recovery
of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids values. The demonstration of the
recovery of acids values is contempl tted in lieu of the normal practice
of neu.trilation of acidity and discharge of waste salts to recieving
waters. Waste acids are prevalent in many chemical manufacturing
operations using chiorosulfonic acid as a raw material.
UIRIES : Con.tac..t th
o Re. wtch a d V iopnei
Fedei a2 Wa te . PoL Uo,i ConL toL Acin L. nztL on
U.S. V pc l n 06 .the. ln c o t
633 1nd ttna Avz. fl.(J.
bJ uiP C. 20242

-------
Mdv fl3. [ YOU
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONETRATTON PROJECT
Datc I I 1c I
ñ’J.1 ’1 is a Grant , under Section 6(b )
Fedcral Watcr Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRA1’!’fEE OR CONTRACTOR:
( Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
The Dow Chemical Company
Texas Division
Freeport, Texas
Mr. W. F. Mcllheny
Contract Research Dept.
The Dow Chemical Company
Freeport, Texas 77541
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : To develop a method of treatment of wastes from
polyhydric manufacturing processes. Several alternative treatment methods
will be examined to determine their technical, engineering, and economic
feasibility. The results will be used to develop a conceptual design of a
waste treatment facility for th briny wastes resulting from this chemical
industry. Processes to be evaluated are aerobic biological systems, solvent
extraction, foam fractionation, dialysis, and adsorption. Studies will in-
clude laboratory, bench scale, and pilot plant scale testing.
IFr uIEIEs:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washln ton. D. C. 202112 (
PITLi OF PROJECT :
PROJECT SITE :
“Treatment of Waste Waters Resulting from the Production
of Po lyhydr ic Organic Compounds”
Freeport, Texas
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMEER : 12020 E
DATE OFFEEED
May 23, 1969
DATE. ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 5, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WF A G! nt
r Contr at
Amount
From:
Thi u:
$282,490
$197,740

-------
T I ‘jjU1ATION SlEET
June 19, 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOP €NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr b ’ R’ic o ;cd
Th .. Pc ject is a Class V Grant , under Section__6(b) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
E. 1. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Pigments Department
Wilmington, Delaware 19898
______________ Dr. Lloyd L. Falk
Senior Consultant
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Engineering Dept.
Wilmington, Delaware 19898
“Ocena Disposal of tndustrial Wastes”
or Eligible
Contract Grant
Period Period Costs
WPCA Grant
r Contr:tct
Amount
July ‘6
8714,1452
April ‘7)
$ 150,116
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
To evaluate the various technical and economic aspects of the dispersal of an
acid—iron industrial waste at sea, over the continental shelf of the Atlantic
off the coast of Delaware.
INQUIRIES:
CR/6/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution ContrQl Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
4 .- ,. ,- , ,- )
L.OU d. s- ’. i_’Jc
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address)
TITLr OF PROJECT :
PROJECT SITE : Wilmington, Delaware
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NU ER : 12020 EAW
DATE OFFERED : June 16, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 24, 1969

-------
I N Oi MATION SHEET
.Tun i9’. 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOP NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b Wicac:d
Tlils Project is a Grant , under Section 6 (b )
Federal Water pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR : The Dow Chemical Company
(Name and Address) 1000 Main Street
Midland, Michigan L 1 .861. O
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address)
TITLr OF PROJECT :
Frank Brower
Director, Hydrocarbons and Monomers Laboratory
1000 Main Street
Midland, Michigan Li.861 0
Demonstration of the Recondition and Reuse of Organically
Contaminated Brines from Chemical Process Industries
PROJECT SITE : Midland, Michigan
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER :
12020 EAS
DATE OFFERED : June 16, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 30, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
r Contr et
Amount
From:
Thru:
1,3O , 408
$509,810
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Develop and demonstrate a chemical-adsorption process for wastewaters from
a phenol manufacturing plant. The process will treat the wastewaterS for
the removal and recovery of phenol and acetate and the remaining brine
wastewater will be utilized for caustic-chlorine production. The basic
process involves the selective separation of organic constituents by activated
carbon beds. Beds will be re erierated by chemical means.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202 2
70

-------
I N ‘ONMATION SREET
Ji p/ ZQ
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSfl .ATION PROJECT
Date to b Peicaccd
Farmers Chemical Association. Inc.
BOX 87
Harrison, Tennessee
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : A full scale development and demonstration
of the treatment pf nitrogenous fertilizer effluents using stripping
or oxidation pretreatment techniques. followed by bio-nitrifiCatiOfl in
a conventional trickling filter sewage treatment plant as modified for
the purpose of providing optimized removal of nitrogenous materials
in the waste.
INQUIRIES:
GR 5/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. DeDartment of the Interior
Washington, D. C. / 2O2 42
Tht.s Project is a Grant , under Section 6 (b)
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
4
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
,
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
TITLr OF PROJECT:
PROJEC SITE :
Edward C. Binghanl
Tech . Asst. to Gen. Mgr.
Farmers Chemical Association. Inc.
Harrison, Tennessee 37341
“Remr val of Nitrogenous Compounds from a Fertilizer
Plant Effluent Using Modified Ope’ation of Conven-
tional Waste Treatment Systems”
Tyner. Tennessee
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUIv BER : 12020 EGM
DATE OFFERED : June 13. 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 27, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA G: nt
r Contract
Amount
From: 6/69
Thru: 6/71
$220,300
$154,210

-------
INPORMAT ION SHEET - - -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONtRACT
This sheet describes briefly an R & D Contract awarded under Sec. 6,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
CONTRACTOR : C. W. Rice and Company
15 Noble Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15205
TITLE OF PROJECT : Cost-Effectiveness of Industrial Waste Water Treatment
Practices
PROJECT SITE : above DATE AWARDED : June 28, 1968
FEDERAL CONTRACT : $56,250 TOTAL PROJ COST : $56,2 o
PROJECT NUMEER : 14-12-4.35 PPBS NO : 1202
BRANCH CHIEF: PROJECT OFFICER:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This contract is to obtain estimates of the total expenditures required by
specific chemi.cal industri?s during the next five years to meet (a) state
water quality standards 8.nd (b) a high percentage removal of each specific
‘pollutant including thermal pollution. The industries covered will include
.those n the Standard Industrial Categories 2813, 2814, 2815, 2818, and
2871 (Jninionia and Urea o ily).
The project is scheduled tQ be completed in October, 1968.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
Off ice of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
ELD U.S. Department of the Interior
IuJl
Washington, D.C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET --
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
This sheet describes briefly an R&D Grant awarded under Sec. 6b,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
C0 TRACTOR Engineering—Science, Inc.
150 East Foothills Blvd.
Arcadia, California 91006
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Preliminary Investigation Requirements-Petrochemical
& Refinery Waste Treatment Facilities”
PROJECT SITE : Austin, Texas DATE AWARDED : June 30, 1969
FEDERAL CONTRACT: TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : l7,OOO
PROJECT NUMBER : 12020 El]) PPBS NO . 12020
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : This project is to compile, organize, and effectively
present the many components which constitute a preliminary wastewater-treat-
ability study. It will be formulated with the intent of serving as a valuable
format and source of reference for personnel charged with conducting
laboratory and pilot plant programs relative to wastewater treatability incluxi—
ing identification of the gaps in the knowledge, and presentation of the
descriptions in a form useful by the Water Resources Scientific Information
Center. Particular emphasis will be placed on programs where petrochemical
and refinery wastewaters are involved, although many aspects of the report
will have a much broader applicability.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2024.2
WJL/4/69
17

-------
PPB 1204
PAPER & ALLIED PRODUCTS
12040
WP Letters To GPO PM
524—05 EBY Oregon State U. — Burgess R Scott G. Webster
628—05 DE l- I U. of Wash. — McCarthy R. Scott G. Webster
1166-02 EFC U. of Wash. — Allen I L Scott G. Webster
1305-01 EXQ U. of Wash. — McCarthy R. Scott G. Webster
DLQ Oregon St. U. - Pacha N. Knittel G. Webster
DBD Montana St. U. - Sanks IL Scott G. Webster
WPRD
12 EEl Pulp Mfgrs. R. Scott G. Webster
Research Leaque
55 EMY The Mead Corp . R. Scott G. Webster
69 P 1W Crown—Zellerbach Corp. R. Scott It
115 N. C. State Univ. II
116 EEK Georgia—Kraft Co. It I !
117 EUG
135 DYD International Paper Co. G. Putnicki
144 Crown Zellerbach Corp. R. Scott I I
183 ENC Interstate Paper Corp. E. Lomasney
240 )RY Continental Can Co. Inc. G. Putnicki
DKD The Institute of Paper G. Webster
Chemistry
EJU St. Regis Paper Co. G. Webster G. Webster
Contract
14—12—] 62 El ctro—optica1 Systems C. Brunner It

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR PULP & PAPER INDUSTRI
PPB 1204: Paper & A1].ied Products
uehanna
I’ I
1 Pue Rico ] I Virgifl
I c’’
[ islands
June 19G7
(I. S. c’
F.d,.jl W.,t, Pe!u. Cu o’ A ’

-------
TN 0i NA.TION SF ET ____________________
Da to lleica: cd
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
This Project is a Class I Grant , under Section 5R of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act). -
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR : Oregon State University
(Name and Address) Corvallis, Oregon 97331
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name and Address)
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Pulp Mill Effluent Disposal”
PROJECT SITE : Corvallis and Newport, Oregon
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12040 EM
DATE OFFERED : ft1 4y 2 9
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : jØ 2 1969 _____________ ________________ __________
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Research will be conducted on predicting the effects of Kraft mill waste disposal
in the ocean on the marine environment. A remote sensing system and aerial
photography will be utilized to estimate waste concentrations, water currents,
diffusion coefficients, and vertical concentration profiles in a i ocean outfall
plume. Aerial photography will be taken with a niultispectral camera system of
the waste field. Boat sampling will be conducted at the same time to provide
“ground truth” data. Data will be compiled and an 1yzed by a system of
computer analysis which was developed for this purpose in 1968-69.
The investigation will include several Kraft mill outf ails along the Oregon
coast. Results of bloassays and chemical analyses will be related to photo-
graphic imagery. Zones of water quality influence about existing outf ails and
proposed outfalls will be estimated, and diffusion coefficients will be
estimated.
IN tJIRIES: Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Ii. S. Department of the Interior
Wathington, D. C. 2O2 2
ii
Mr. Fred i . Burgess
Head, Department of Civil Engineering
Oregon State University
Contract
Period
Grant
Period Costs
r Contract
Amount
From :6/1/69
Thru: 5/31/70
20,781
$ 19,237

-------
INFORMATION SHEET—
RESEARC -1 & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL hee.t dec ..ti .be4 b.n_4A Zy an R 6 V Gtan awcAd.ed undvt See. £
FedeitaL Wa Wt PoltwtLon Con.titot Ac.t(Ctetzn Wa.te..’t R o’ta.tà,n Ae.t).
GRANTEE : University of Washington
Seattle, Washington
Dr. Joseph McCarthy
TITLE OF PROJECT : Tt Studies of Low Molecular Weight Lignin Sulfonates’
Effective Date: Sept. 1, 1968
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington DArE AWARDED : Oct. 18, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $32,707.00 for 5th yr.T AL EST. PROJ. C0ST:$170,000.oo
PROJECT NLINBER : WP00628-05 PPBS NO . l2O 4
l201.O DEH
VESCR PTION OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to isolate and
characterize low molecular weight lignin sulfonates which are formed from
the lignin in wood by the action of the &ulfite pulping process. The
information obtained should be of assistance in developing economic uses
for the waste liquors from sulfite pulp i1ls.
INQUIRIES : Contaet the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWce 06 Re&ea eh. a d V vdopnent
FedeML Wa.tex PoFlu.ti.on Co,vUtot Athn n ’uLt n
U.S. Vepa.nJ.ment o ( the In.te.n..w4
GW/l -69
Wa6Ithtgto t, 0. C. 20242
78

-------
IN1’ORMATION SBEE
June 2. 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPI NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ Beleax’d
This Pcoject is a Class I Gratit , under Section 5 (Research) -
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
of the
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
( Name End Address )
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98105
Dr. G. G. Allan
Associate Professor Fiber Science
College of Forest Resources
TITLE OF PROJEC : “Pollution Abatement by Fiber Modification’ t
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington
PROGRAI4 (PROJECT) NUI ER : 12014.0 EFC
DATE OFFEREDI May 28, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AwARDED1 : June 10, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
) Contract
Amount
From:June 69
Thru:May 70
Terminal
$L 1,603

$37,850
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The broad aims of this research are:
1. to determine what species, size and ;hape of molecule
can be attached to lignocellulosic fibers using simple
reactions compatible with the established processes for
the manufacture of fibrous products;
2. to investigate the effect of the attac1 ent of such
molecules on the physical properties of fibers and
fiber composites, and
3. to use this information to assess the feasibility of
reducing water pollution due to pulp liquor discharge
by reattaching these waste chemicals to paper and wood
fibers.
IN TJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Ach,iinistration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202 2
79

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thi s 4h v dc c,t. .be.4 biU y an R 6 V Giuut au.w ded undtIL Sec .
Fc .dc &aL ktCe)t PoLLu. .tLon Cor .tJLo Ceeajt WaJj. .t Re okaf ion AC.d .
GRANTEE : Uriversity of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98105
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Stethn Stripping of Kraft Pulp Mill Effluent StreamsU
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington VATE Aü/ARVEP : Feb. 6, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $1l.3,665 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $il.3,665
PROJECT WUM5ER : WP-1305 PP8S N0 . 120 4
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : The broad objective of the presently proposed
research is to improve the effectiveness and to extend knowledge concerning
the possible industrial applications of the t ISEKOR?! process which, in
essence, comprises the counter-current steam stripping of Kraft pulp mill
condensate streams in order to bring about the removal of steam-volatile
organic compounds from the fluid and thereby provide relatively clean effluent
water which can be reused in pulp mill process or else discharged without
danger. The volatilized organic substances are condensed to yield water-
immiscible “SEKOR oils’ which may find uses in commerce. Use of the process
may also result in a substantial decrease in the odorous substances emitted
into the atmosphere from Kraft pulp mills.
Major Investigator: Dr. Joseph L. McCarthy
INQUTRIE.S : Con.tae. the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O.i.c.e o Re.4eim.ck ar4 VweLopreitt
Feduta2 Wa.te.t PotJ . .wtion Conttot Aán it .t’ta.t2on
U.S. V .tmeiu o the. Ir2e o’t
GRW 1/69 Wa.ah.2ng.tcn, P. C. 20242
70

-------
INFORMATION SIIEET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Th4 ike dt e ube4 bt L an R S V G&astt a wit de4 und t See. 5
e4aL Wa.tVL PotLu .t.on COnJLOL Ac.t(CLea.n Wa.teit Ru ofl a t- D.t Act).
GRANTEE : Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Slime Growth Evaluation of Treated Pulp Mill Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Lebanon, Oregon VATE AWARVEV : March 12, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT : $12,910 (1st yr.) TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $33,000
PROJECT NUMBER : l201. O DLQ. PPBS NO . 12O1.
VESCRIPT ON OF PROJECT: BUDGET PERIOD : March 1, 1969
______________________ to Febriiar 28, 1970
The main objective of this research is to evaluate the slime growth
promoting potential of treated pulp mill wastes. Wastes treated
by various means will be tested for their ability to support slime
growth using various procedures. Additions]- studies will be carried
out in an effort to define specific carbon and nitrogen sources in
treated wastes which support the growth of Sphaerotilus . The effects
of environmental factors on growth of SphaerotilUS also will be
examined. This study will contribute to the development of abatement
procedures for contrplling slime growth as well as assist in establish-
ing suitable water quality criteria for streams receiving pulp mill
wastes. The study also will add. to the knowledge o haerOtilUS.
INQUIRiES : Conta .t Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DAST
O i e o Re.oea.kdt amd Vtveopnen.t
Fedviat Wa tex Pollut.4cn Con.t’wt Acbn.àt44tkn.tLoIt
U.S. Ve .aJj,,utt o £he Inten..tok
- -
Waohi. igt_on, V. C. 2024f
81

-------
[ NFO MATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkiA ke.e2 dac.tLbe6 b4 t y an R P G’tan.t ah4VJl4ed UMdtst See. i
Fede.n.aL (i te. . PoUu.tj.on Contto e A( t(C1egn Wa tpjt Reo o’ &t on Act).
GRANTEE : Montana State University
Bozetn n, Montana 59715
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Color and Mineral Removal from Kraft Bleach Wastes”
PROJECT .STTE:Bozeman , Montana PATE AWARVEP : April 1, 1969
FEDERAL GRANT : $27,3 4 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $32,791 (first)
year
PROJECT NUMBER : 12040 DBD PPBS NO . 1204
VESCR1PTTON OF PROJECT: BUDGET PERIOD : April 1, 1969
to March 31, 1970
The broad objective of this research is to determine the economic
potential of synthetic resins for the control of pollution from la’a.ft
bleach wastes particularly in reuse and recycle systems.
More specifically, the objectives are (1) to explore the use of
synthetic resins for the removal of color and other refractory organic
contaminants, (2) to optimize the operation of fixed resin beds for the
removal of organic contaminants and also for simultaneous deinineraliza-
tion of waste streams intended for reuse and recycle, (3) to seek
economical regenerating methods and chemicals and Innocuous means of waste
regenerant disposal, (4) to compare the relative effectiveness and economy
of resins with carbon and (5) to estimate the cost of waste water renovation,
reuse, and recycle using resins either alone or in conjunction with other
aids.
INqUIRiES : Cos2iu.t At 9 L r,o,t) Co rfZo 4 .. B4’/4AJe I,, D4S7
O Ar o Ratdt h aad Pevetop eeitt
Fede.’t Z Waten. PoLLwt . on Contxot Aá tàia tj on
U.S. Pen,,ent o the Inte.tw4
- ----. 1 T .
Wa4hôt ton, P. C. 2024!

-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo 6 iee.t de4c. 2beo bnit 1 j an R S V G.’ta.n.t a.MwLde.d urdeA See. 6,
Fede’taL Wa te PoUatLon Contjtot Act(CLean Wa.te& Rei ok&t..Lon Aet).
GRANTEE : -Pulp--Manufacturers Research League, Appleton, Wisconsin
TITLF OF PROJECT : Development of Reverse Osmosis for In-Plant Treatment of
— Dilute Pulping Industry Wastes.
PROJECT SiTE : 6 mills to be used VAlE A ARVEV: 2
FEDERAL GRANT : $483,371 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $690,530
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 12-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
120U0 EEL
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The project will determine the ability of reverse osmosis technology
to both produce a product water suitable for re-use in mill processes,
- - and a concentrate available for by-product recovery or for treatment
prior to discharge. Wastes to be handled, at separate mills, will include
weak sulfite washings, weak Kraft washings, bleach wastes, condensates
and semi-chemical wastes. The semi-trailer housed reverse osmosis
equipment will be transported to separate mills for the experimental
work. Presently projected mill sites are located in Wisconsin and
Minnesota. Others are to be selected.
TNc2 iR1ES : Con. ac. -t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J. .ee o Re4ewu h and Veve1op w n.t
8/68 Fedeitat ( !a..tex PoLLu.t&’n Conttot Adn tt o t
U.S. Pep vttneit.t o tue 1n.WL LOX
Jil L,J- _ ...... 1 fLU .
Wa&h.Lngton, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEAR I-j & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4ktt.t de4c tthe4 6t 4 Zy an R S V Gtaitt a uv ded unde’t Se.c . 6
F 4w2 Wa.te.t PoL .tu.ç on Confjtot Act(C . tait Wa tut Re4toM..t.i.on Act).
GRANTEE : The Mead Corporation
Chillicothe, Ohio
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Evaluation of Role of High Rate Trickling Filters and
Aeration Devices Separately and in Combination for the
Advanced Biological Treatment of Integrated Kraft Pulp
PROJECT SITE : and Paper Mill PATE AWARVED : Effluents”
Chillicothe, Ohio December, 1966
FE ERAL GRANT : $299,950 or 70% of TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $4.28 500
project
PROJECT NUMBER : WPHD 55-01-67 PPSS NO . 1204
12040 F2 ’IY
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : The pulp and paper industry needs to find an alter-
native treatment process which is less expensive and difficult-to-operate than
the conventional activated sludge process. As a step in this direction, this
project will involve the continuous operation of a pilot treatment plant con-
taining plastic trickling filter, brush-aerated oxidation ditch, conventional
aerated lagoon, deep aerated lagoons, and two clarifiers in combinations and
evaluate possible efficiencies.
The specific research objectives are to: determine the effect of influent
quality on biological treatment; evaluate potential of plastic trickling
filters alone and in combination with brush-aerated oxidation ditch, conven-
tional aerated lagoon and deep aerated lagoon; and to achieve higher-than-
conventional BOD removals from kra .ft mill wastes.
INQUIRIES : Con.tae..t tltt Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i. .ee o Reoea*th amd Vtvdopi ent
FedeMt Wa..tvt. PoZL .tJon Con wt Aá. ita.t ,t
8/68 U.S. Vmejit o tht 1nte Lo’t
J.IJJ L.J.. __ .t .. U.IJ .
Wa.ohôtgton, V. C. 2024?

-------
INFORMATION SHEET -’
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL4 4hee dae 2be.s bnitf,ty an R S V Gwvt au.v.n.de.d a tdcit Sec. 6,
F deML Wa.te..’r. PoUutJ.on Contitot Ae.t(C.L ut (Ua.tvL Re o’uvt.Ltrn Ac.t).
GRANTEE : Crown Zellerbach Corp., Camas, Washington.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Economic Optimization of Secondary Treatment and Determination
of Load to Control Biological Growths in a Stream.
PROJECT SITE : Lebanon, Oregon VATE AWARVEV : 12-5-67 (O&A)
FEVERAL GRANT : $503,739 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $802,000
PROJECT NLIMSER : WPRD 69-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 ELW
VESCRIPTIOM OF PROJECT :
This project will seek to determine the costs of mechanically aerated
lagoon treatment of pulp mill and paper mill wastes by examining in
detail the comparison of retent ion time, aerated logoon depth, basin
configuration, recycle and parallel versus series operation of two lagoons.
Information will also be obtained concerning ttreatment achieved by
multiple lower hp surface aerators compared to two high hp units.
Further, the projecl will, by use of test streams, eek to determine
the degree of treatment needed to prevent slime growth in the receiving
stream.
Iwg(IIRIES : Contac. the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J e o Re ean.cth and Vc ve2opreitt
8/68 Fede.n.aL Watex PoUwt . on Contnot AdnA.4t’wJ)Lon
U.S. Vevi. n .nt o the TPt.t€IL. .OJL
000 LJ., _ .ti ra. I’W .
( Ja6hA..ngton, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkiA 6hee..t deoc. 2be b Zy an R V G wit aLav 4ed wide.t See. 6,
Fede*g.e Watex PoUut.Lon Cont’r.ot Aet(CLea.n (Ua.tut Re o’ a.tLon Ae.t).
GRANTEE : N. Carolina State University, Raleigh, N. C.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Filtration of Kraft Pulp Liqiior through Chips
PROJECT SiTE : Raleigh, N. C. VAlE AWARPEV 8-4-67 (0&A)
FEVERAL GRANT : $18,144 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $25,920
PRCJECT NUMBER : WPRD 115-01-68 PPSS NO . 1204
VESCRIPTZON OF PROJECT :
The project is directed toward a determination of the decrease in pollutional
load that may be gained by filtration of weak Kraft washings through wood
chips just prior to their ent y intq the pulping process.
flJ ZUIRiES : Conta .L ç1 istri LPo11uU.on tr Br h, DED
V 64 t 4 K tMC ama
8/68 FedeMt Wtte.k PoUutco t Co,ttkct Ath i n4 t on
U.S. Vt i.t it t o tht I.,.te.tAox
un .1.. .. fLit .
WaikA ..ngton, V. C. 2C24t

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk skee..t de4c.itA.be.4 b .t L f a ’t R S P G a,t t a w ded u.ndvt Ste. 6,
FedeAaL Wa.WL PoL&ition Con.tiLot Ac.t(Cteait Wa.tut Re o’ta t on AcJ1.
GRANTEE : Georgia-Kraft Co., Rome, Ga.
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Selected Internal Kraft Mill Wastes in
Cooling Tower
PROJECT SITE : Macon, Georgia PATE ALMRVEV : 8-7-67 (0&A)
FEVERAL GRANT : $287,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $411,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 116-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 EEK
PESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
This project will determine the ability of cooling towers to both permit
heat dissipation and recycle of waste water back to the condensers as
well as the treatment efficiency that may be provided by passage of
waste waters through the tower. Condensates and decker filtrate will
be handled by this facility. Organic load reduction will probably be
gained by a combination of chemical oxidation, air stripping of volatile
constituents and biochemical oxidation.
lNO jJIRIES : Co .tae .t Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DFD
8/68 O ( i2e o Re.,oeatch. aasd VeveLopntn
F&e t Wa e.t PoUut n Con t&ot Ath ht 4t&itü,n
U.s. Pep 1mvit o ke I i en. o
JILIJ-L _ .t. t. fi.l .
ri &hAngton, P. C. 20242
87

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
T; 4 ah eJ deAeivibe.4 b.t L Zy a..n R S V G mtt auw&ded andut S . 6,
FedvtaZ Wa..te..’t Pottwti.on Cont’toZ A c t(CLea.n WttW . Re to’uttion Act).
GRAMTEE : Georgia-Kraft Co., Rome, Ga.
TITLE CF PROJECT : Treatment of Kraft Mill Effluent by Foam Separation
PROJECT SITE : Rome, Ga. VAlE A(iJARVEP : 8-4-67 (0&A)
FEDERAL GRANT : $48,181 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,830
PROJECT NU’ 1 ! ER : WPRD 117-01-68 PPBS NO . 1204
12040 EUG
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT :
The project is directeo towara an examination of the possible separation,
in the foam phase, of a significant portion of the dissolved organics
contained in primary treated Kr ift Mill waste. Hopefully it may be
discovered that a high percent of the pollutional load may be separateo
in a relatively small volume by these means. This may then provide a
larger volume of ‘bottoms’ suitable for discharge and a smaller volume
of ‘tops’, or collapsed foam, directed to complete treatment.
JNQ(IIRTES: Cottaei the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O Aj e o ReAea tch ac4 Ve.ve2opne.n
8/68 FCdQML W vte. . PoUu.tLon ConttoL Ath,tL6 tita t Lo,t
U.S. Ve.pa .tm .it.t o .the. In teA to;L
U! LJ.r u.w L-t . !i.IL. _
Wa.4h.th on, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SFIEET—
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 &huL de cn2be o bnit Lq ait R 6 V Gwtt aukVtded tutdet See. 616)
FQ4eAOZ Wate.n PoI1wti nt Co tt.&oL Ac..t(C wt Wat ii Re4toM.t40 ’t Ac. t).
GRAWTEE : International Paper Company
220 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Evaluation and Demonstration of the Massive I ime
Process for the Removal of color from Kraft Pulp Mill Wastes.”
PROJECT SiTE : Springhill, Louisana VATE AWARVEV : JUN 1 4 1968
FEVERAL GRANT:$595,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $85( ,000
PROJECT NtiMBER:WPRD _ L J5-01-(R—l)—68PPBS NO . 1204
12040 DYD
VESCR1PTION OF PROJECT :
International Paper Company proposes to isolate wastes from the
caustic extraction stage of a Kra.ft pulp bleaching line and the
unbleached decker of the pulp mill, and to treat these wastes
separately and combined for the removal of color and reduction
of biochemical oxygen demand by the Massive L.izne Process over a
period of 27 months.
INQUIRIES : Contact At Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OW2e 06 Re4ea.tek.aaId Oeve2opnent
Fe4eML Wa.tex PoLLu.tA.on ContkoL Athn n.Lotkat2o*
U.S. Vtp A.tm iit o the InWAO4
U1. _ f ..i ftsi tL , .
GRW/5-68 WtL6huIgtOn,P. C. 20247

-------
INFORMATION SIIEET—--
RESEARCJ-1 & DEVELOPMEN’r GRANT
TIz hee dc c 1 a, b ti’J ij an R i D G/ta iv aicw ded undcA 5cc.. 6kb)
Fe de .aL W eL PoIJjj o n Co tJLo & Ac (C eizn UJctt .& R e o’wJJo n Ac .t).
GRA !TEE: Crown Zellerbach Corporation
1 Bush Street
San Francisco, California 94119
TITLE OF PIZOJECT:”A Demonstration Plant Evaluation of Four Methods
for Pulp and Paper Mill Sludge Utilization and Disposal”
PROJECT SiTE : Camas, Washington DATE AC’MRVEV : April 3, 1968
1-EVERAL GRAMT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $848,320
PROJECT 1U’J ER:WppD 144-01-68 PP8S NO . 1204
VESCR1F11O ! OF P2OJITCT :
This demonstration study is a full-scale investigation of four methods
of utilization and disposal of primary sludge from a combined pulp
and paper mill. The areas of investigation are: disposal by incin-
eration, utilization as “hog-fuel” ma e-up in a conventional steam
boiler at rates ranging between 5 and 50%, use as a dried mulching
material for highway sl9pe preparation and the evaluation of sludge
as an agricultural soil conditioner.
j UIP.iES : Co4t a. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J..ce o Re5eit.tch a -’4 Vcveop ien t
8 68 Fe4e.&ol Wa eit PoflatJon Con-tJLoZ AcLnijvL t&a..tLon
US. V n nt o ha Inte,’iioit
Eli 1• JJ .U.
(UC .4hJng on, V. C. 20242
90

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TUA hee dc4c.iz..Lbei wt R V au wuftd undVL S . 6(b)
Fc dvw.L WzWL. PoZlzLtJon ContjwL Ac (CLeizn CLla WL Re o&a t oii Act).
GRA!ffEL : Interstate Paper Corporation
300 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Chemical Coagulation Color Removal System for
Kraft Mill Effluents”
P?.OJECT SITE : Riceboro, Georgia V/JE 4 JWEV : June 2’?, 1968
FEV AL GPMff:$466,895 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $741,160
PROJECT HW BER : WPRD-183-O1-68 PP S ?40 . l2O4
12040 ENC
E.SCR1PT1ON OF PROJECT : This project proposes to develop, install, and
demonstrate a new chemical coagulation process for removing color
from kraft pulp and paper mill effluents. The process uses a
stoichiometric lime addition to the untreated wastes, prior to primary
edim’ritation, which idsorbs the color bodies onto the lime hoc and
is settled with the sludge. This sludge is then removed to lagoons
for dxying and storage.
IN9LIZRIES : Con. a .e hçIndusLrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
o lZeAwJbch a -4 Vc uo nA
FedvuzF teit Po! .2u ti on Con.t’wt A thv &a.t_ on
U.S. V pw t cnt o th in. teit co L
Iii . .. JJ.L
GRW:5/68 a4hAJ2gtOn, V. C. 20242 9 ,

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL s i et d cx .Lb b’t. ey a.n R S V G ta,t .t aLa .n4ed undvt Sec. 6Lk)
Fedeiw2 Wa it PoL&tJ.on Co Wtoe Ac..t(Ctean Waleit Re..otoM.tLon Act).
GRA ITEE : Continental Can Company, Inc.
Paperboard and Kraft Paper Division
lodge, Louisiana 71247
TITLE OF PROJECT : “A Color Removal and Fibrous Sludge Disposal.
Process for the Kraft Paper Industry”
T’ROJECT SiTE : Hodge, Louisiana PATE A uARVEV : JUL 25 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $750,000.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2,865,970
PROJECT NUM5ER : WPRD—240-ol-68 PPES NO . 1204
12040 DRY
VESCRJPTTOW OF PROJECT : The two year project will develop economical
design and operational data applicable to the Kraft pu.lp and paper
industry in removal of color in mill effluents, and disposimg of
fibrous sludges. Color removal, will be accomplished by lime precipi-
tation of the color bodies and fibers, with subsequent regeneration
of the lime by sludge combustion in a din.
ZNQUTRTES : Co.ttac t the Industrial. Pollution 9ontrol Branch, D
OW..ce o Re. ean. h. as d Veve2opneat t
FedetaL Wa te.a FoLLution Con.t#tot Athnait atjon
U.S. Pep ne,vt o the inte.4co4
iii iJJ _ _ . L — -
Waoh4iigtoit, P. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEAR(;IJ & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkAo k e2 decttb bn .a ty an. R I V G&a.,tt aiavtded undeJ Sez . 6kb)
Fedt t Wa.tek PoLLu.tio’t Cont’toe Ac2(C1 an Wa.Wx. Ru2o’tat t Ac.t).
GRANTEE : Institute of Paper Chemistry
Appleton, Wisconsin 5 911
TiTLE OF PROJECT : ‘ T Chenncal and Physical Nature of Color Bodies in
Kraft Mill Effluents Before and After Treatment’ T
PROJECT .SITE:Appleton , Wiscorsin PATE ALUARVEV : DEC 21 1968
FEVERAL GRANT:$ll9,5OI .7O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST:$170,721
PROJECT NUMBER : l2O 1 ODKD pp5 NO . l2O -i
VESCRIPT!ON OF PROJECT :
Kraft pulping wastes which are discharged into streams may darken
the color of the water, contribute to the biochemical oxygen demand
and increase the solids content of the stream. New federal and state
wa:er standards will require removal of such materials from mill
effluents. Lime precipitation in small scale operations has been
shown to remove certain of the solid constituents and demonstration
grants on lime treatments have been approved at three kraft mill sites.
The objective of the proposed project is to determine the chemical
and physical nature of the color bodies in the effluents from these
three kraft mills both before and after lime treatment. The investi-
gation should lead to a better understanding of the results of the
lime treatments, and may suggest means for more complete removal of
color.
iNQ UiR1ES : Con..ta.e.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch - DED
O iie o Re6ewit h aad VtveZop ev .t
FedvcaL Wa te.& Potiutthn Cont,wt Athnütt .ti ,n
U.S. Vepa aM IeJLt o the I e .on
JU J..JJ _ . _ fLIL .
Waohôtgton, V. C. 2024!
93

-------
Ti’ )u A’rIoN SHEET
Jiin i1 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOP ENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr t j ( (, d
Jh:’ P!’DjcCi is a Class V Grant , under Section Six of the
Federal Watur Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
ti me and Address)
St. Regis Paper Company
150 East 1 1-2nd Street
New Yo ’k, New York 10017
TITLi OF PROJECT : “The Production and Use of Activated Carbon for Water
Renovation in Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills”
PROJECT SITE : Jacksonville and Pensacola, Florida; and West Nyack, New York
DATE OFFERED :
DEG(RIPTION OF PROJECT :
St. Regis Paper Company proposes a program for the development of an economical
system for maximum water reuse in the kraft pulp and paper industry as a means
of water pollution control and conservation. This program is based on two
concepts. The first is an effluent treatment cycle using activated carbon and
the second is on-site carbon production and activation from readily available
raw materials with full integration into the kraft mill recovery and power
systems to achieve the lowest net cost of activated carbon.
IN 1JIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. epartment of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 2O2 42
GRAr ’fEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
r. Roy L. Miller
Post Office Box 1591
Pensacola, Florida 32502
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NuMBER : 12C40 EJ1J
JUN 1 3 19 9
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : JUN 251969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
FWPCAG nt
r Contr.ct
Amount
From: 6-30-69
Thru: 6-30-72
$1,14 .61,562
$878,1+72

-------
INFORMATION SIIEET -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT @ F CONTRACT
ThzA he e dc c 1 tLb b i..t ty an R 5 V Gi t.t aovtded undut Sec. 6, Contract
Fcdc. w2 Wa .’L PoLtu ..t z,n Con.t’toe Ac (Ctea.n Reoto’tztt.Lon Ac.tj.
GRANTEE : E1ectrO_QPt Systems, Inc.
300 North Haistead St.
Pasadena, California 91107
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Plasma Arc Processing of Spent Sulfite Liquors t ’
P OJLCT SITE : Pasadena, California VATE AWARVEV : May 16, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $Li.9,9L 5.OO TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $It9,9L .5.00
PROJECT NLJMSER : 1L _l2_162 PP8S NO . 1201
VESCRIPTIOW OF PROJECT : To determine the technical and economic feasibility
of plasma arc trea ment of sulfite waste liquors.
j. JQUiRIES : Contc.t tIt Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J o Re . eaitch asid Vc ueLop ien t
FedQ.M2 Wa. tvt PoUu2i.o,t Cont’wL Aán n 4tka.tLon
U.S. V pa. ic.n .t o the In. e. .4.ok
GRW 1/69 -
Wa4hA.n ton, V. 20242

-------
PPB 1205
PETRdLEU1’4 & COAL PRODUCTS
August 1969
12050
wp Letters To GPO PM
1179 DIT Texas A& Res. Fdn. - L. Lively G. Rey
A. Martell
DKF U. of Oklahoma-Reid L. Myers E. Dulaney
11452 DRC Illinois Institute of E. Dulaney
Techno1o r-Kintrier
WPD
1714 Villanova Univ. E. Dulaney
E. Clark
W D
215 EKT American Oil Co. 0. Olsen G. Rey
2L 1 3 DSH Mi. Petroleum Inst. P. Lefcourt E. Dulaney
DML American Oil Co. A. Printz G. Rey
Contract
DMT Engineering Science, W. Horn G. Rey
Inc. - Gloyna
‘7

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR PETROLEUM REFINERIES
PPB 1205: Petroleum & Coql Products
Estuary
ap ake-Sus jeh nna
t57
U. S. o I
der.l Witr Pc .on C - ,l A- —
Hudson Charnp!&
/MAI E\
I
Eng and
Pue—to R 2 J

-------
LOCATION OF INTERI1EDIATE CC4L TAR PRODUC P lANTS
PPB 1205: Petroleum & Co L Products
Hudson Champta
Estuary
c 7
l I
jPuerto R coj I Virgin I
_____ I c’’
LLs mdsJ
Juno 1 G7
U. S. o tP . I.,t. .c .,
Wat c Pc:Iut.un Co ’ oI Ad .us?’.:ioii
U . ..

-------
INFORMATION STIEET——
RESEJ\R( )l & I)LVELOPMENT GRANT
hte .t de. oc,tLb tc.e Lq an R S P Gkwtt auv ded undut See. J
FeLL )La.L Wa. tvL PofJjjj4.cpt Confjto Acl(Ctwt Wa te,’t Re4to’ta.t on Act).
GRA 1TEE Texas MM Reoearch Pbundation
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “,c ta1 Ion-catalyzed Oxidation of Pbenols ax
Aromatic A inea”
October_14,
PROJECT .S1TE : Texa8 A&j PATE ALMRVEV: & X 1968
FEPURAL GR,4JIT : 1eO,265 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : *234,000
PROJECT_WLLMBER:wp 01179 .03 PPBS NO . 1205
— /2.O o bIT
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : A Study of t) e mechmni n and feasibility of
metal ion-catalyzed oxidation of phezols aM aromatic QII 1v by mole.
cular oxygen in veatewater systems pe.rU 11y treated with potassium
perii anganate.
iN U7RIES , CoIt*4 ht Indu3tria3. PoUution Control Branch
OW..ee o Reoeat k at d Veue.LDp?ten.t
FedeJLaL Wa.teA PoUat on Coat kot Ath,thit uCion
U.S. V TJCAJMtIIt o the Inten4ot
W*Iit 1 t cut
W .4h.ingto*, P. C. 2024f
/00

-------
TNi’Oz(MATION SHEET
RESEARCH, DEVELOP?€NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ 1 ’Jen cd
Th! s Project is a Class I Grant , under Section 5 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Aót).
____________________ University of Oklahoma Research Institute
1808 Newton Drive
Norman, Oklahoma 73069
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Prof. George Reid
(Name and Address)
TITLr OF PROJECT : State-of-the-Art Evaluation on Petroleum and Coal Wastes
PROJECT SITE : Norman, Oklahoma
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12050 DKF
DATE OPFERED
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : Jan. 8, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costa
‘WP A ( nt
)r Contract
Amount
From; 1o/l5/6
Thru: lo/11+/69
$17,897
$1L ,2 9 7
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective ofthis project is to develop a state of’ art report on the
characteristics of oil and coal wastes. Th study will include the procedures
used by industry for aggrigating and handling these wastes and will deter-
mine the applicability and efficiencäes of various treatment processes.
Literature surveys, personal intervi ws and field studies will be used to
define future research needs.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202142
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
4
ELD 1/69
/01

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt 4hee de oe L’eA 6’t.. Ly an R £ V C taii cw. vLd d w’td t Szc. 4:
Fedvwi Ja teit Po 2w . .o t CO tJLO Ac-t(C w.,i ct-te ’L R o c,,tLon Ac }.
GRA !TEE : Illinois Institute of Technology
TiTLE OF P’i OJECT : Efficiency of Fibrous Bed Coalescers
BUDGET PERIOD: Dec. 1, 1968-Nov. 30, 1969
P ojEcTS 1 TE: Chicago, llinoi VATE AC’)A )EV : Jan. 13, 1969
FEVE AL G A”iT : $32,596 for the TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $6 ,ooo
— 1st year
PROJECT NU :R : Wp_O1L 52_O1 PPBS NO . 1205
12050 DRC
VSCPJVflO 1 ! OF P2OJECT :
The objective of this research project is to develop a mathematical
description of the removal of fine-divided, insoluble, liquid
- pollutants from an aquebus waste stream by ‘means of a mixed fibrous
bed, and to develop a procedure for designing such beds. The procedure
will then be applied to the abatement of pollution from an actual
industrial source in the Chicago area.
7NQ UJRiES : Coivtac the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Zr o Re vt.ck a d VaveLôpnei -t
Fedet t (Ua WL Pothz,tjjj& Cont’Lot A t . w Loi ’t
U.S. o tha ln c o
— L I-
Wa h Lngton, V. C. 20242
Et2 1/69 /OZ

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TJZL.6 41tee d j -Lbe bitJ f Lq an R £ V Gw a vLdld undv. Sec. 4;
Fedciw .t Wa.- ci . Poiewtioa Co,’JjtoZ Ac (C earz C .’a .-te/L e o. c on Ac.-t).
GRA?ITEE: Villanova University
Dr. Edgar W. Clarke
TITLE OF P WJECT : “Elimination of Water Pollution by Used Oil
Re-refining Plants”
PROJECT_SITE: Villanova, Pa. VATE A ’)AiWEi) : Completed
FLi2ERAL GRA”ff : $33,796.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : -
FIWJECT !W R : WPD l7L . -0l-67 PPBS HO . 1205
VESCRJVF 1O’I OFP2OJECT : The objective of this grant project was to
demonstrate, on commercial size equipment, an economical process for
re-refining of waste oils with recovery of waste products so as to
eliminate water pollutton. The work was done at the Douglasville, Pa.
-plant of Berks Associates, Inc. A final report describing the project
and the process is available.
INQUIRIES : Co tt ic tJ Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Lce. o Re w h a d V v22opneivt
Fedc ’La2 ( ‘a tc PoL!uJ on CorJJto Ath t nL &ation
U.S. V n o -tha In te.n..Lo’
ELD 1/69 CIJa4hij o7j, V. C. 20242
/03

-------
INFORMATION SI-IEET --
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL hc.eJ dec be b’ c. tj a V G’uv attwtded undc...t Se c. 6,
Fedv tzt Wcz c’ PoZJiiJ on CorJJ o Ac 1C &eojt )rt vL Re o’La.,tJ.oIl AC,t).
American Oil Company
GRANTEE : 910 S. Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinoi 1 ,s 60680
TITLE OF PROJECT : Fluid-Bed Incineration of Petroleum Refinery Waste
PROJECT SITE : Mandan, North Dakota VATE A I PJ EO : May, 1968
FEVERAL GRAVT:$170,265 TOTAl. EST. PROJ. COST : $354,530
PROJECT NW. 3 R : WPRD-2 15-01-68 PP S NO . 1205
12050 EKT
VESCR7 FY70’! F P2OJECT :
The project consists of: (1) the design and construction of a fluid-
bed incineration system for treatment of refinery chemical and oil
sludge wastes, and (2) the operation and evaluation of the system as
a means of treating the refinery wastes.
Capacities up to 70 barrels per day, at full scale, are to be pro-
cessed. The identity of operating problems and the limitations of the
system are to be determined. The cost of treatment of the refinery
waste by the proposed method will be developed for the system as
optimized during the demonstration period.
INQUIRIES : Con.tae. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ke. o Re.4 LvLch ci4 V ve2opnen t
8 ‘68 Fedvutt Wa. te.’L PoL&iJJrnt Con.t’tot Adn Oti.4 LaLZ ,n
U.S. Vc vtJ i jtt o .th2. IrtWt Z.o/L
U L.J-. ...... . fLU .
Wa4hi.n ton, V. C. 20242
/0 •

-------
INFORMATION SHEET
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 4hee.t d c tibe. b.tit ty an R £ V G ,tt aukvlckd undvt Sec . 6,
F€.dc.&aL Warte..’i. Po!J.ation Co,Wtoe Act(CLean Wa Wt Re. 4 stoka.tLon Ac . 1.
GRANTEE : American Petroleum Institute
Air and Water Conservation
1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Improved Capabilities of Biological Systems to
Assimilate Oil”
PROJECT SITE : New York, New York VATE AWARVEV June 20, 1968
FEVERAL GRAWT : $51,470 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $84,990
PROJECT NUM5ER : 3-o1-68 PP5S NO . 1205
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT :
The project wifl c9nsist of a study of laboratory scale activated
sludge waste treatment systems which will be operated to determine their
tolerance to various types and amounts of hydrocarbons, the nature of the
interference of the hydrocarbons, the fate of the hydrocarbons in the system,
and to study methods for improving pretr€atment of the influent and of
improving the operation of the systems.
The work will be performed by Hydroncience, Inc. under the
direction of an API Task Force. The project period will be 1 year.
iNQUiRiES : Con.tae ..t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i e o Re. ea.t h and Deve2opneivt
FedeMi WO. JL PoLtution Con.t’wL Adn nLWtatLort
U.S. V t nt o the in.tefl.c.o4
JJS L,.JL . __ .L.... ILt.f .
ELD/5-68 Wa4h,ngtoDt, V. C. 20242
/05

-------
INFORMATION SIII ET -—
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENI’ GRANT
Tki he d : tce L ti y an R £ V G ta t t c.v.w ded undeA Sec. 6,
Fe4sz .a2 L teA Uj f jon ContAct Ac t(Cecan (“a t .’t Re o’w21.on Ac.C).
GRAIJTEE : Amer_:& Oil Company
910 : tn Michigan Avenue
Chica;,. Illinois
PILE OF PROJECT : ‘Treatment of Refinery Effluent by a Unique Combination
of Biological and ChemLcal Processes.
PROJECT SITE : iting, Indiana VATE A )A VEO : Februar 20, 1969
EPJ.L GRA.VT: 336 , 535 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $1,737,775
PROJECT M.U.’ Eg : 1205 — 0 - IIIL P?8S NO . l2O
DESCRIPTiON OF P2OJECJ :
A 30 !‘ D scale project to demonstrate the advantages of using chemical
coagulation and au flotation following biological conditioning to provide
refinery effl ie t of high quality. To establish what operating flexibilities
exist in such cc bination processing and the costs associated therewith.
To evaluate a n’ er of unique design features, including a hitherto unproven
process for disposal of oily sludges, a unique and low—cost method for
preventing sludge deposition in an aerated lagoon, a novel application of
rotary-drum ski rs and a comparative study of alternate design features
for a r flotatjo .
INQUIRIES : Ccnt . (1 t Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O6 Lce 06 Re .swteh a, d VeveLopne.n t
Fe4vwL Wate P c / .ut1on Co,Wtot A a t1on
U.S. Vtp .nJ ier. .c o the I tte.tc.o’t
633 Ind. gna Avt. N.W,
P. C. 20242
/o ,

-------
INFORMATION SHEET - - -
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
This sheet describes briefly an R & D Contract awarded under Sec. 6,
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
CONTRACTOR : Engineering Science, Inc.
150 East Foothill Blvd.
Arcadia, California 19006
TITLE OF PROJECT : The Characteristics and Pollutional Problems Associated
with Petrochemical Wastes
PROJECT SITE : Austin, Texas DATE AWARDED : Sept. 25, 1968
FEDERAL CONTRACT : $11,190.00 TOTAL PROJ. COST : $11,190.00
PROJECT NUMBER : 14-12-461 PPBS NO : 1205
BRANCH CHIEF : William J. Lacy PROJECT OFFICER : George Rey
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The general scope of the project as developed under
the Plan of Operation shall include a detailed development of the fo11owing
1. History and Projection of petrochemical indu try;
2. Definition, magnitude, and pollutants associated with
these waste treatment problems;
3. Evaluation of control, treatn nt and dispoaal practices;
4. Listing of the special legal problems involved with
petrochemical Waste management;
5. Economic feasibility of present and future control i ethods,
reflecting down stream uses; and
6. Evaluation of research needs.
The objectives of this proposed project will be achieved through a well
coordinated plan of operation. A complete literature review shall be con-.
ducted using the numerous volumes available in the Engineering, Chemistry,
Biology, and personal libraries located on the University of Texas campus.
Additional information shall be obtained from various governmental agencies
and selected industries. Additional data derived from the unpublished
Environmental Health Engineering Reports shall be utilized.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial Pollution Cpntrol Branch
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 20242
/07

-------
PPB 1206
RJOD & KINDRED PRODUCTS
12060
WL. Letters To GPO _________
1486 U. of Wash. — Carison J. Boydston G. Keeler
ECF Oregon State U. K. Dostal G. Keeler
EDK National Canners Asso. W. Pierce G. Keeler
E .U Ohio State U. Res. Fdn. E. Harris G. Keeler
DSI Beet Sugar Developaient Fdn. K. Dostal G. Keeler
93 Beet Sugar Developnent Fdn. J. Boydston G. Keeler
2U EHS Melbourne Water Sd. Inst.9 K. Dostal G. Keeler
226 Ag. Experiment Station E. Lomasney G. Keeler
U. of Pi erto Rico
WPRD
3 RAI Research Corp. A. RichardsonG. Keeler
15 R.T. French Co. J. Boydston G. Keeler
18 FMC Corp. J. Merrel G. Keeler
38 Minute Maid Co. D. Hill G. Keeler
43 Beet Sugar Dev. Fdn. R. Scott G. Keeler
49 EHT North Star R&D Inst. W. Cooke G. Keeler
54 John Norrell & Co. 0. Olson G. Keeler
56 Vah1sin , Inc. H. Pahren G. Keeler
58 Snoldet Growers J. Boydston G. Keeler
134 EHU National Canners W. Pierce G. Keeler
Asso.
151 National Canners Asso. W. Pierce G. Keeler
161 Winter Garden Citrus D. Hill G. Keeler
Products Co—op
/0?

-------
PPB 1206 Cont’d
FOOD & KINDRED PRODUCTS
12060
Letters To GPO
1 5 DQV Swift & Company 0. Libby G. Keeler
219 D Dairy R&D Corp. G. Rey G. Keeler
221 DPE Coi n Products Co. 0. Libby G. Keeler
230 DSD U. of Oklahoma Res. G. Putnicid. G. Keeler
Inst.
241 DFF Farmbest Inc. 0. Olsen G. Keeler
251 EAE National Canners Assn. W. Pierce G. Keeler
EGV Gold Kist Poultry H. Snyder G. Keeler
EIG Western Potato Service K. Dostal G. Keeler
DXF Crowley t s Milk Co. A. Richard— G. Keeler
son
/10

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR FOOD PROC STT U PLANTS
PPB 1206: Food & Kindred Products
I I
1 Puerto R1 1 Virgin I
[ tsfandsj
Centráj
Hudson Champlai
hesapeake-Susquehanna
V. S. D, .rnw t .
Wat v PO I ’UI%

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4hee.t dac tiLbe .i b’u t ey an R S P G’taivt aawt4ed undvt See. 5
F€dUW2 tvt Pollu.t2on Co tLtot Ac.t(Ctwt Wa..teit Re4tonat t’n Ac.tj.
GRANTEE : University of Washington
Professor Dale A. Carison
TITLE OF PROJECT : Status and Research Needs f or Potato Waste Waters
PROJECT SITE : Seattle, Washington PATE AWAR EV : June 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $18,364 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST$19, 3 31
PROJECT NUMBER : WP—0]486-O1 PPBS NO . 1206
VESCR!PTION OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to prepare
an exhaustive state-of—the—art report on potato processing waste
waters including identification of process and waste streams, effects
of process modification, types of processes and corresponding waste water
treatment processes, effects of waste streams on receiving waters and
land areas, and recent research developments. The report will include
a discussion of current ni jor research needs.
INQUiRIES : Ccntac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OWJ t O;ç Re4eakL k aad Veue1op eiit
RN 8/68 FedvwL *tvt PottutLon Contk.ot AthnütLôt.ita.tLon
U.S. Ve * mesit o At l,i e.tw&
lU LJ. __ . ti. !L .
(Ua4king.ton, V. C. 20242
/12

-------
INFORMATION SHEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4he.et decp .Th an R 8 V G’twvt ax .wLded undv . Sec. 5
Fed tai ‘a. .te & POULJJJOJt Con tito Ac .t(CL zn (Ua vt Re on..a. Lon Ac t).
GRANTEE : Department of Food Science and Technology
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Water Pollution Abatement in the United States
Seafoods Industry: State of the Art”
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 1969
PROJECT SITE : Corvallis, Oregon PATE A(tJARVEV : April 15, 1969
f VE; .AL GRANT : $17,695 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $18,652.00
PROJECT flU f8ER : 12060 ECF PP6S NO . 1206
VE.SCRJPTZON OF PROJECT : The objective of this 8 months study will be
the development of a State of the Art document on water pollution
abatement technology and research for the se foods processing industry.
INQUiRiES : Con .ta the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ke o Re en. ch a d Vuelopiett
FedeML Wa.t cit PoL&W o n Con tjto1 AcL, i ,ia.tL it
U.S. Pep 4tie vt o the l,tte w,it
Wa4h. .ngton, v. C. 20242
1/3

-------
INFORMATION SI-IEET -
RESEARCH & DE\’ELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4he.e de c be2 bv. Ly an R E V O’w..n t1 ’. VLd2d t id t S . 5,
Fe4eitc . Wa c ’L PoUw Co o .t Ac (C- .c.ctri ( a.te 1 ’L P o o’w. .Uon Act).
GRAHTEE: National Canners Association
1133-20th Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
TITLE OF P’ 1 WJ&.CT : ? Production and Disposal Practices for Liquid Wastes
Fi 4 om Canning and Freezing Pruits and Vegetables”
r’ O.1ECT S1TE CA , Berkeley, Calif: DATE_/.C’ 1 1 ARVEV: tvi y 6 1969
—--U. of Wisconsin, Madison— —-— ‘
FEDERAL GRA ’tT : $20,025 TOTAL EST . PROJ._COST: $22,5 +2
PROJECT NW ER : 12060 EDK PP8S NO . 1206
VSCWIIOfl OF P2OJECT :
The objective of this one year project will be the development of a
state-of-art document to encompass: (1) current and projected contri-
bution of this industry to the national water pollution problem;
(2) description Qf present and anticipated waste treatment technology
to include construction and operational data (3) identification of
areas reqeiring further develQpmeflt.
P:QUIRIES : Contac the. Industrial Pollul ion Control Branch
OJ .1!. o Rc a/ k a .’.d Ve .v 1opn itt
FedcAa Z Wa teJL PoUwt-ion Con-t’wL Athiut tZon
U.S. V pc; t o .th l tJ o ’.
633 1rzcWu t Ave. NM.
UJc4hht9ton, V. C. 20242
HGK /7/( 9

-------
I i’ . iOiU’IATION SHEET
June 18, 1969
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date to b’ RrJcu ;cd
This Project is a Class I Grant , under Section 5 Research
Federal Water poLlution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Dr. W. James Harper
(Name and Address) 215 Vivian Hall
2121 Fy-ffe Road
Columbus, Ohio
TITLr OF PROJECT : “State of the Art
Systems”
PROJECT SITE : Columbus, Ohio
PROGRA 4 (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EGU
DATE OF. ’EPED : June 17, 1 69
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 27, 1969
143210
of Dairy Plant Wastes and Waste-Treatment
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of this one year project is the development of a State of the Art
documeni for the dairy industry. Plant processing methods, water utilization,
waste streams in various size and type of operations, dairy food plant waste
treatment systems as a function of processing practice, plant size and location,
:‘urrent industrial development in dairy food processing and waste treatment,
i,resent research in progress and future research needs in relation to dairy
wastes, will be overed.
IN UIPIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Mministratjoii
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202142 /15
Ohio State Unive”sity Research Foundation
13l + Kinnear Rd.
Columtus, Ohio 143212
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WPCA G nt
r Contract
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 6/30/70
$l ,5O5
$12,954

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4he .eJ d c Lb an R g Ckcui cw)vLd d undvt S c.. 6
Fe4ei t? . Wa. e/L PoZIJj. .Uo;L Co txo Ac,t(C. e tzri U’a-te ’L Re . o’wt on Ac-t).
GRAflTEE: Beet Sugar Development Foundation
156 South College Avenue
P. 0. Box 538
Fort Collins, ColoradO 80521
T iTLE OF F1 OJECT : ‘5-tate-of-Art, Sugarbee - ProceSSiug Waste Treatnieflt”
P O3ECTSITE:Fort Collins, Colorado VATE / C AiWEi) : April 1 , 1969
FCVERALGRMT: $1L ,3l0 TOTAL EST. PROJ . COST: $15,900
PROJECT W 13ER : 12060 DSI PP S ?4 . 1206
VESCPJ ’TW?I OF P2OJECT :
The objective of this 8 month project will be the development of a
state-of-art document emcompaSirig current domestic and foreign waste
treatment technology in the sugarbeetproceSsi industry. The report
will include recommendations on major research needs.
TNQUIRIES : Co v z .the. Industrial pollution Control Branch
O Lc o Rc eaMh a d Ve2opnen.t
FedciLctt ( a tcJL Poth tLoit Con .t’tot Ad, w ..tLon
U.S. Vcpc : n o ha lr et io
Wa sh.&ig.tott, V. C. 20242
ll D

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThU 4heet d€ b t 4 R gp Gka,tt au ded undex Sec. 5
FedeAa2 Wa.te.n. PoLfu.tjnn Cont&ot Act(Ctegn Wa.tvt RQ . okat Dn Act).
GRANTEE ; Beet Sugar Development Foundation
P.O. Box 538
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
TITLE OF PROJECT : jjaerobic-Aerobic Sugar Beet Waste Treatment
PROJECT SITE : Tracy, California PATE AWARVEV : June 1, 1968
FEPERAL GRANT : $25,300 - 4th year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $243,450
PROJECT NUMBER : WPD 93-04-68 PP8S NO . 1206
VESCR 1mOv OF PROJEcT ; The objective of this project is to demonstrate
a solution to the pollution and odor problems encountered in beet sugar
factory waste disposal. This will be accomplished by passing the
wastes (mainly screened flume water) through system of anaerobic-facul-
tative-aerobic lagoons set up in series. Some water from the aerobic
lagoon will be recycled back to the surface of the anaerobic lagoon to
eliminate odors.
INQUIRIES : Contac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DEL)
OWfe o ReoeM.ck amd Vtue.6pneit.t
RN 8/68 FP4PJLgZ Watelt PoLtgi.t . on Contwt Ath t n.t’uztA n
U.S. Vepa4tmeiit o the IftteX4 JL
I!! LJ-L. .. .L IUL
Wa. hLngton, V. C. 20242
1/1

-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCI-j & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 4hte..t dtc .tLb, b.ti.t ty an R S V G.tgn.t au ded undvt See. 5,
Fede aL Wate.t PoWit on ContAoe Ac..t(Ctegn Wa.t it Re4ton.afjon Act).
GRANTEE : Melbourne Water Science Institute
Water Science Laboratories
15-21 Earl Street
Canton, Victoria, Australia
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Cannery Waste Treatment by Lagoons”
PROJECT SiTE : Shepparton, Victoria VATE AL’JARVEV : May 1, 1969
Australia
FEVERAL GRANT : $11,920 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $61,810
PROJECT NUMBER : WI ’ ]) 211-02-68 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 EHS
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT ;
The objective of this study will be to demonstrate the feasibility
of treating fruit and vegetable processing wastes by anaerobic
lagoons and oxidation ditches.
The existing 100,000 gpd facilities at Shepparton will continue
to be us d during the final year of 2 year project to evaluate and
optimize operational parameters of the anaerobic-aerobic system
operating jointly or independently.
INQUIRIES : Con.tg .C the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i .ce o Re4ea.k.ck amd VeveZop est*
Fed t L Ei.a .te.x PotLut.Lon Cont’tot Athn . nit’t&t. ,n
US. Vep n.t te.nt o the In e ct
Jill IJL. _ —. IIJJ. .
Wa6ithigton, V. C. 2024?
/18

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TIIL 4hee t de ajp2bq.., bitAt ty an R S V G.rcant auwLded unde/v. See. 5,
Fed ML Wa..te .& PoLtLLtLon Contn.ot Ac. t(Ctea.n Wa.tvt Re o’ta t on Ae t).
GRANTEE : Agricultural Experiment Station
University of Puerto Rico
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
TITLE OF PROJET: SP05 of Rum Distillery Wastes
PROJECT SITE : Rio Piedras, Puerto Ric jE AWARVEV : July 1, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT:$4 6 ,252 - 1st year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 85,4.00
PROJECT NuMBER : 226-0 68 pp NO . 1206
VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The objective of this project is to develop
the best method for the disposal of rum distillery waste. The waste
will be subjected to detailed analysis and then will undergo pilot
treatment by means of anaerobic digestion, activated s1u ge, and
lagooning. These processes will then be evaluated in terms of ef-
ficienc and econoniics.
iNQUIRIES : Contact titt Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O A2e o Re o.n c k agd V veLop en.t
8/68 FedeMZ ( te. PoFlu.tion Contk.oe Athn ,t4tiw.t on
U.S. Depan eit o the in.WuM
111 LJ __ ti.. ILkL
Wa4histgton, V. C. 2024t

-------
1NFOR 4ATION SIIEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkü 4ht .t de4c.n .be4 b.t Lt y an R S V Gk4It ai ded unde. See. 6,
FedeML Wa.tvt. PoL2i .tLon Co,WtoL Ac.t(Clcgn Wa.tQJt Ra oM.Uon Ac..t).
GRANTEE : RAI Research Corporation
36—40 37th Street
Long Island City, New York 11101
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Improvement of Treatment of Food Industry Waste
PROJECT SiTE : Long Island City, N.Y. VATE AWARVEV . Feb. 9, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $40,075/i year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $57,250
PROJECT NLLMBER:WPRD p-oi-68 PPBS NO . 1206
PROJECT OFFICER : Allyn Richardson NERO
VESCRTPTIOW OF PROJECT :
To investigate on a laboratory scale electrocheuiical oxidation of milk
whey as a method of waste treatment.
INQUIRIES : Contac2 the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i2e o Re6ean. k amd VeveLop ent
FIGK 8/68 FedvLaL (date PoUu.ti. n Contwt Athn 4 ta.tL4,n
U.S. Vtpa.n. meitt o the inte.tw4
JU LJ.& v . Ur
Wa4kLngtoII, V. C. 2024?
,zo

-------
INFORMATION SHEET—-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkA..o oh ct deoc..tiJ,e o bitA..tgq a,t R S V G’ta,t.t aMwcded wtde t See. 6,
Fedc. LL (L te4 PoUut on Con.t’toL Ac.t(Ctegn Wa2e Rej oiwZLon Act).
GRANTEE:The R. r. French Company
Shelley, Idaho
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Aerobic Secondary Treatment of Potato
Processing Wastes with Mechancial Aeration”
PROJECT SITE : Shelley, Idaho DATE AWARVEV : Aug. 1967
FEDERAL GRANT : $483,217 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $690,310
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 15 .-O1-R1-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : This project is designed to demonstrate the effec-
tiveness of an aerobic secondar3 treatment plant for treating the total
flow of potato processing wastes (1 MGD and 14,580 lb. BOD). The aerobic
treatment will follow an exis±ing primary treatment plant.
The secondary treatment plant will consist of three earthen aeration
basins equipped with inechancial surface aerators, a mechancially cleaned
secondary clarifier, an aerobic digester, and sludge disposal beds. In
adaition, a silt removal system will be constructed, consisting of
screening facilities, a pumping station, and two earthen ponds to re-
tain silt accumulations for one processing season.
The aeration system will be tested under three operating schemes:
1.) as an extended aeration system in which biological sludge is returned
to the aeration basin and the excess, to the digester; 2.) as a flow-
through aeration basin with sludge carryover into the effluent; and 3.)
as an intermittent aeration system in which the clarified upper portion
of the aeration basin contents is discharged directly to the river.
During these operations, studies will be made on the effects of foaming
ice, temperature, pM, and nutrients on the efficiency of the process.
STATUS : Contracts for long lead items such as the aeration equipment
and clarifiers to be awarded within thirty days. Final design and
specifications for construction of the treatment facility to be com-
pleted on or about ! y 1, 1968.
1N UIRlES : Cont .t At Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW e o Re4ean .ck amd VweLøpneii.t
Fedv L (& ex PoZlutJ..o,t Contn.ot Ath nA4tjw..tson
4/68 U.S. Vepa4. est.t o At InteitJ.c,t
3 LJ.. __ .L.. fLU .
Wa4lthigton, V. C. 20242
12/

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkiA 4heu dec..t be bnit ty an R S V Gn.a.s t auwi4ed unda See. 6
Fedeitai Wa..teis . PoLLwUoit Contjtoe Act(CLean Wc...tejt Re6tôM.t on Act).
GRANTEE : FMC Corporation
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Cannery Waste Treatment by the Kehr Activated Sludge
Process”
PROJECT SITE Santa Clara, CaliforniapXTE AWARVEV : December, 1966
FEVERAL GRANT : $29,300 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $43,200
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 1 0167
_____________ PPBS NO . 1206
VESCRIPTTON OF PROJECT : The Kehr Process, in essence, involves a combin—
ing of activated sludge aeration of 10,000 to 15,000 mg/i mixed liquor
solids with aerobid digestion in a single aeration tank. This provides
high removals of DOD, solids, and nutrients; facility for periodic high
strength wastes; a stabilized, drainable water sludge; and comparatively
low physical plant costs.
The Dbjectives are to:
1. Demonstrate the revised Kehr Process using liquid-solids separation by
high-rate flotation_densification system of activated sludge solids.
2. Demonstrate effectiveness of the process for treating cannery wastes
combined with domestic sewage having a BUD 5 of 1000 to 2000 mg/i.
3. Demonstrate performance of the process with densif led return sludge
solids of 4% to 8% on a dry weight basis, thus affecting plant economy by
use of smaller tankage volume.
4. Determine processing requirements for application to a full-scale
treatment plant.
INQUIRIES : Conta the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O J2e o Re&ean.ck amd Veue.LopneiU
8/68 Fed eMt Wa.tex PoUutLon Con.t t Ath,i i.tLon
U.S. Vepa.tb,es t o the 1n te.tw
J* —tJ. . 1 , _ . 1. 1. tLWr
(4ohAngton, P. C. 2024t
/22

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkALo okeet dec .ti beA b’t t Ly an R S V GWLt a c.n.de4 wtdeiL Sec . 6,
Fede.taj Wa.te.n. Pa! ut’n Contjtot Ac t(Ct t Waie/t Re on at on Act 1.
GRANTEE : Minute Maid Company
Orlando, Florida
T1TL OF PROJECT : “Removal of Organics and Nutrients from
Citrus Processing Plant Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Leesbuig and Auburnda1 E AWARVEV : December 1966
Florida
FEDERAL GRANT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $550,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 38-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
In Florida, about 52 plants of the citrus industry discharge about 130
mgd of waste, having an organic concentration amounting to 318,000 lbs.
of SOD daily, into streams and lakes of Florida. This project is a step
towards solving this pollution problem.
The objective of this project is to demonstrate the design and opera-
tional factors for organic and nutrient removal of citrus process waste
by the activated sludge process, by stabilization in oxidation ponds
with and without induced aeration, and absorption of nutrients by plant
life with subsequent drying of materials in citrus feed mill.
STATUS : Bids have been reviewed, selected, and contract awarded for
construction of treatment facility at Auburndale. At Leesburg, the
site is operational, and worthwhile information being collected on
mixed municipal and citrus processing wastes by the activated sludge
System.
INQ.UIRIES : Con a .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW.ee o Re .6 a ek a d Vevetop testt
FedeMZ Wa.te.’t PoUwt. on Contjtot Ath L Z.t ,t o,t
4/68 U.S. Pep afj,egtt o the lnte.tj.ot
LJ . __ . t. ruiL
WO4hAngton, V. C. 20242
/23

-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 itte.t dac,tthe4 tLt y an R P G aitt a tn de4 undut Ste. 6,
FedQA4L Watu,. PoLt .tLon Contjtol Ac2(C. €g,t Wa tvt ReAto’taf4on Act).
GRANTEE : Beet Sugar Development Foundation
TiTLE OF PROJECT ; “Concentration of Sugar Beet Wastes for Economic Treat-
ment with Biological Systems”
PROJECT SITE : Fort Collins, Colorado PATE ALUARVEP : December, 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : l02,OOO TOTAL E.ST. PROJ. COST : 372,5O0
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 43-01-67 PPBS NO . 1206
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The project is one phase of research to find an
economic chemical or biological system to treat high volumes of sugar beet
.‘actory waste. One or more successful processes are necessary to satisfy ef-
fluent standards in States where sugar beets are processed.
The objective of the project is to concentrate sugar—beet factory wastes by
chemical precipitation and reuse of the decanted solution in a closed recir—
culation system. The excess water accumulated during the operation will be
treated by anaerobic and/or aerobic processes to remove BOD prior to discharge.
The bioactivity will be studied concurrently.
INQUIRIES : Conts .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i2e o RrnLvtcth amd VeueLop en.t
Fede.ML Wa.teii. PoIJutj.on Con.Vcot Ath,Ji4tn.atj .cn
8/68 U.S. V .tt,,pjtt o the In.te.tij ’t
in i. _ .t. — . fLU .
W4h.A.ngton, P. C. 2024t
/21

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkiA 4he d ocxLb bniA6ey an R 6 P G’tait.t aukvtde d undvt Se . 6,
Fedejtal Wa1 .& Po!JjLtLon Contitoe Ac. Ctegn Wafvt Re 6toka tijjn Ac. t).
GRANTEE : North Star Research & Development Institute
3100 38th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406
TiTLE OF PROJECT:Use of Fungi Imperfecti in Waste Control
PROJECT SITE : MinrleaPohjs, Minnesota VATE AWARVEV : Sept. 1, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $76,585 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $118,585
PROJECT NUM6ER: ppj-j 49-01-68 PPSS NO . 1206
12060 EHT
VESCR1PTTON OF PROJECT :
The objective of this 2 year project is to evaluate rapidly- growing fungi
strains for use in biological waste treatment processes applicable to
waste streams from soybean and corn processing operations.
Synthesized myceliuin will be eva1uat d for use as animal and/or human
dietary supplement.
Parameters for industrial scale-up to accomodate a 1—3 mgd process
operation will be determined based on results from a 50 gpd pilot plant
operating on a continuous culture and flow basis.
INQJJIR 1ES : Contae. t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O i t Re6eatch a,id Vevelopne,t.t
HGK 8/68 Fede.taL Wo2ut POLtu.ti Co,vtn.ot
U.S. Vt d fl .tj Qjtt o the lItte/?2o4
ifl tJ. _ .L .
Wa hôtgton, V. C. 20242
/25

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkIA 6hu.t daenLbe bFI4tf,L.IJ a t R 6 P Gtaitt a iw .de4 undeJL Sez . 6,
FedeML (l .tek PoUwtJj n Con.tjtoe Aa.t(Ctean Wa. tut Re o’tdti .on Act).
GRANTEE : John Morrell & Company
Ottumwa, Iowa 52501
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Construction and Study of a Demonstration Plant
Utilizing the Aerobic Channel Method for Treating
Packinghouse Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : 0ttumwa, Iowa PATE AWARVEV : December 1966
FEVERAL GRANT : 89,O0O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $815,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-54-0l-67 PPBS NO . 1206
VESCR1PTTON OF PROJECT:Four oxidation channels will be constructed to han-
dle an equivalent load of 20,000 lbs. of BOD/day from a packinghouse on
a 7-day basis with estimated flow of 3.5 mgd. The objective is to find an
efficient, effective, and economical method of treating raw packinghouse
wastes so they can be discharged directly into streams.
Each channel will be 460 ft. X 60 ft. with a capacity of 150,000 Cu.
ft. Channels 1&2 will receive raw wastewater from existing primary treat-
ment systems. The overflow will be directed into Channels 3&4 which will
be operated intermittently as aerator and settling basins. Channel 4 will
allow the sludge to be returned to Channels 1&2 or removed for harvesting.
The solids removed will be centrifuged or evaporated ar i dried.
The most feasible way of handling solids will be determined. Tests will
be conducted to determine if the dried solids can be used an an animal-
food supplement.
The process will be designed to give variable rates of aeration and
flow to obtain maximum bio-chemical oxygen demand and nitrogen removal.
The flow will be sampled and analyzed for total nitrogen, chemical oxygen
demand, suspended solids, total solids, and grease; weekly samples will
be tested for total volatile solids, total fixed solids, phosphate, total
bacterial content, and coliform count.
STATUS : Final design and specUications for the treatment facility have
been completed. Expect to advertise for bids no latter than April 15,1968
and begin construction during May 1968.
INqUIRIES : Ccntac.t he Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O a o Re6ewt.ck aid VeveJ.npnei C
FedeMZ Watvt PoL6t on ControL Athn nL tta.ti on
4/68 U.S. Ve A*i ,tenC o the In2eici.ok
I n I.J. __ .‘L i. !LbL
Wa4h.Lngton, P. C. 20242
/L

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tk 4hee.t dacx4.bu M .i..s4ey an R S V G ta,tt auvj, ded wide.’ ,’. See. 6,
Fedeitai (Lfa.te..k PoLLwt 4 on Co?vtkoe Ac.t(Ctea,t Wa..t t Re o t on Ac!.t).
GRANTEE:Vah1s1n , Inc.
Easton, Maine
TITLE OF PROJECT:”Treatjnent of Alkaline Wastes from Potato
Processing”
PROJECT SiTE : Easton, Maine VATE ALUARVEV : December 1966
FEDERAL GRANT : $196,014 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $280,020
PROJECT NLLMSER : WPRD 56-01-67 PPES NO . 1206
VESCRTPT 1ON OF PROJECT :
The objectives of this project are to demonstrate the feasibility of;
treating potato processing waste using the activated sludge s tem ; com-
bining potato processing waste with sugar beet refining waste; and the
feasibility of three in-plant closed waste water systems in the sugar
beet plant.
The project will provide extremely valuable data to both the potato
processing and beet sugar industry. The aim is also to determine if
a $30 million industrial complex, composed of potato and sugar beet
processing and a residential community, can exist on a small stream,
as is proposed, and have clean water.
STATUS : Expect to receive finU design and specifications for con-
struction of the 600 gpm pilot scale activated sludge system, and
proceed with advertisement thereof April 1, 1968, construction to
begin shortly after May 1, 1968.
INQ UIRIES : Contac .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW2e o Re4ean . k amd DeveLopneitt
4/68 FedMat W zte,t POL&L.t On ConttoZ Ath,u,at.’tgtLo,t
U.S. Ve tLmesvt o the Inte)L.(ot
JU !.JJ _ ., _ .t. — . !LU .
Wa.6kAngton, V. C. 20242
/Z7

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo 4hee.t de6cxiJ,e6 M2& Ly a,t R S V Gkaitt a .k4ed undejt Sec. 6,
FedeM.t U tex PoUuL on Cont L Ae.t(Ctwt Wot ,t Reo2on. .tJ.on Ac -ti.
GRANTEE• Snokist Growers (formerly Blue Ribbon—Big Y Growers)
Yakima, Washington
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Pollution Prevention by Aeration of Fruit
Processing Wastes.”
PROJECT SITE : Y ima, washington DATE ALMRVEV : August 1967
FEDERAL GRANT : $347,669 TOTAL EST. PROJ. CO.ST:$572,262
PROJECT NLLM8ER:wpp 58-01-68 PP8S NO . 1206
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT.The cannery now dis charges it fruit-processing
wastes into the Yakiina River. The objective of this project is to de-
termine the most economical method of removing 90% of the SOD from an
expected flow of 2.6 MGD with a BOD 5 loading of 20,000 lbs.
Aeration methods, including modifications to the activated sludge
process, will be tested on a plant-size scale to determine their effec-
tiveness in treating fruit processing wastes.
Existing and specially designed new facilities, including lagoons
and clarifiers, will be used in prototype studies of the effects of
varying amounts of aeration, waste loadi waste detention, sludge re-
turns, and chemical on the BOD level.
During the 1967 canning season, the lagoon and clarifier will be
operated as a completely mixed activated-sludge facility. The new la-
goon, with added aerators will operated as an aeration lagoon with no
sludge return, each under varied loadings. During the 1968 canning season
the facilities will be operated as a modified contact stabilization
facility.
Information on the modifications will be compared and the results will
be applied to the activated sludge process for use by industry and govern-
ment as method for the biological treatment offruit processing wastes.
STATUS : Aeration basin completed and operational. Contracts being awarded
for balance of construction. Facility to be completely operational by
September 1968.
INQLUIRIES : Con c.t ±J Industrial Ibilution Control Bxanch
OW2e o Rrna* h. aiid VeveLop en
FedeM2 Wa te’t PoUu.t4on Conlitoe Aá i itüt’ta.t cn
4/68 U.S. Vep&n.b eJIt o the in.te’uot
jug i..j. .., ... L... IJ.IJ .
Wa6h.Lngton,D. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL6 4hee.t deAcn.JJ,e4 b t4A ty an R I V G&a,tt au.kvtded and Vt Sec. 6,
Fe4eAoi Wa..tcjt PofJati. on Co,ttjLoe Ac..t(Clean CUa.teit Re oaa.tA on Act).
GRANTEE : National Canners Association Research Foundation
1133 20th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20036
TITLE OF PROJECT:”Reconditioning and Reuse of Food Procossin Brinos”
PROJECT SITE : Central Valley, Calif. PATE AWARVEV : February 1, 1968
FEPERAL GRANT : 3l,500 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : 45,000
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-134-0l-68 PPES NO . 1206
12060 EHU
VESCR1PT!ON OF PROJECT : Briefly the proposal is to conduct a pilot
scale study to determine the feasibility of re—using spent brines from
storage and processing operations in olive packing by reconditioning
the brine through a charcoal absorption and filtration co1ui n. The
portable filter will be operated throughout the duration of the i.wo
year project at each of four locations in the California Central Valley
area.
The supporting collection, reduction and analysis of data will be
directed toward eliminating the present tie—in to municipal sewage
system as well as lagoon systems used by olive processors and develop
economic and effectiveness data for full scale development.
INQUIRIES : Ccn.t .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW.ce o ReMwtck ar4 Ve veLopneit.t
F deML Wa.te/t PoUuJJ.on Cç nt’tot AththvLôt.itat2on
8/68 U,S. Vepa.ttmeitt o the lnit.w’t
*1J LJ.L. .L..... U.L1 .
Waohisigton, P. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThU hhee.t deocit4 .be bn..Lt,çZy an R 6 V G itt, auwtded ande.st Sec. 6,
F 4e to2 Wa.te.t PofJ tjj Contr.oe Ac.t(CLwz Wa2eJL Re oto’ta.tLon Act).
National Canners Association
GRANTEE : 1133 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Integrated Treatment of Liquid Wastes from
Food Canning Operations”
PROJECT SiTE : San Jose, lifornia PATE AWARVEV : 2/14168
FEVERAL GRANT : $33,330 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $55,120
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 151-01-68 PPBS NO . 1206
PESCRTPTION OF PROJECT : The objectives of this proposal are as follows:
(1) to determine the feasibility of employing a high rate t];ickling fil-
ter in the San Jose, California canning plant to treat strong organic
wastes encountered in vegetable and fruit processing operations, which
although low in volume (approx. 20% of total), contribute as much as 60%
to the total BOD load. The I £‘ter will be 14 ft. in diameter and 21.5 ft.
high, employing synthetic media and operating in a range between 100 and
200 gpm. It will be subjected to variations in flow, pH control and nu-
trient addition to determine its optiinun working parameters. (2) To de-
termine the effectiveness of using an air flotation process with and with-
out addition of flocculants in removing suspended solids prior to secon-
dary treatment. (3) To evaluate ce iter discharge solids separation tech-
niques and its effect on the total BUD content.
A study will also be made of the usage 01 edible acids as a bacteriostatic
agent to prevent growth in recirculated flume water. Following the one
year testing operation, it is proposed to select units to be incorporated
in full scale plant operations for a further demonstration project. The
reason for the low project cost is due to NCA already having on hand
several pieces of equipment required to test these processes.
STATUS : Received worthwhile information on operation of units during
last fall’s processing operations. Will continue with evaluation of the
various units Ihis fall.
INQUIRIES : Contact the Industrial. Pollution Control Branch
O Ar .e o Re ea.tch. amd VeueLopt ent
4/68 Feduwl Wa.tek PoLtu.t on Ccnt’rot Athn n L tita.t on
U.S. VepanM ten.t o the in.’uok
u LiL _ . t . IL&v
(a4h,stgton, V. C. 2024t
/30

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkLo 4hee.t dec JLbe b’u.v4ey an R a P G/LaJVt aLai/Lde4 u.rtde.k. Se. . 6,
FecLeM.t Wa..tpjv. PotLu tii ’n Cort t&o& CL n (& a te.& Re oiutt on Act).
GRANTEE : Winter Garden Citrus Products Cooperative
P. 0. Box 399
Winter Garden, Florida
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Lime Treatment and Inplant Reuse of an Activated
Sludge Plant Effluent in the Citrus Processing
Industry
PROJECT SiTE : Winter Garden, Florida PATE AWARVEP : March 22, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $165,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $397,300
PROJECT NUMBER: WPRD-l61-DI -(R-2)-68PPBs NO . 1206
PESCRIVTTON OF PROJECT : The objective of this proposal will be to
develop operational parazaeters and conduct an economic evaluation on
lime treatment of effluent from a 2 ingd. activated sludge system treat-
ing citrus wastes and in-plant reuse of the lime treatment effluent.
This study will cover lime treatment, with the addition of coagulant
aids, and dewatering of sludges by centrifugation for usage in cattle
feed preparation. Determination will be made on this system’ s effective
in further reducing BOD, COD, and nutrients found In the activated
sludge effluent.
The proposed project intends to demonstrate the effectiveness of lime
precipitation on eff .uent from a 2 mgd. activated sludge system treating
citrus wastes. The activated sludge system consists of an aeration pond
providing from 24 to 36 hours detention time with the overflow being
directed into a final clarifier. Operation of the activated sludge system
will afford pH control along with nutrient supplementation and sludge re—
circulation,
iNquiRiEs : ContA.c.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i2e o Re4ea h and Pevelopnen.t
Fede.&at Wa.te.k POLLu.tijyn Contjtoe Adnt nLst&atLjjn
4/6g U.S. Vepvt.tinen.t o the In e.it.u &
III LJ.L _ — . !L1J .
WaohAjt ton, P. C. 20242
/3/

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkJ.4 4hee.t dt cnjJ, b’iAA Ly an R g V G’ttutt ai ded undest Se . 6,
Fedcj.o2 te4 Poth&tü,n Contitoe Ac..t(CL a n Watvt Re. oM..tLon Ae.tI.
Swift and Company
uwqgEE . R&D Center
1919 Swift Drive
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Removal and Recovery of Fatty teria1s from
Edible Fat and Oil Refinery Effluents”
PROJECT SiTE : Bradley, Illinois PATE AWARVEP : JUL 10 c
FEDERAL GRANT : $249,307 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $389,970
PROJECT NUMBER: WPRD l85 _ O1.. .(R _ 1) _ 68pp NO . 1206
12060 DQV
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT :
The 18 month study to be conducted at the Swift and company Bradley
Refinery plant will have as its main objectives to demonstrate the
effectiveness and economics of employing air flotation for the re-
moval and recovery of fatty material present in water eminating from
processing operations.
In addition to an extensive study of flocculating agents, a complete
characterization of processing waste streams is planned. Laboratory
analysis will include ROD, COD, ether solubles and suspended solids
determinations, etc.
INQUIRiES : Con.tgc.t the Industrial Pollution control Branch
OW2e 06 Re& a&ek aaid Vevelopnen.t
FedeML ( Ze4 PoLtwt on Contitot Ath ntta .i o,t
U.S. epa.a ,,en.t o the In.tetw,c
ru”
HGK:5/68 Wa6hLngton, V. C. 2024
/32

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL &hui dw xLbeA birLtgy an R g V Gruutt au i’tded undUt S .e. 6,
FedeAaL WaJ.eA PoUu.tjj,n Con.titoe AcL(Ctwt Wa.te,t Re oMZLon Act).
GRANTEE : Dairy Research and Development Corporation
TITLE OF PROJECT : “E1jh jriatjon of Pollution by and Utilization of
Protein Concentrates (Dried Whey) from Milk Residues of cheese Making”
PROJECT SITE : Remsen, New York PATE AWARVEP : December 19, 1968
FEVERAL GRAWT: 551,350 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $4,234,071
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-219-01-Rl PPBS NO . 1206
12060 DEQ
DESCRiPTION OF PROJECT : A development and full scale demonstration for
a process for the conversion of dairy whey into saleable food products
by evaporation and spray drying methods. The conversion of whey to a
useable food product in lieu of its disposal as a waste product from
cheese manufacturing is the pollution abatement method to be developed
and demonstrated. Research will be conducted on the use of dried
whey as a supplement to various food products.
INQUiRIES : Contae .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O J .rt o Re4eaxith. aud Veve2opnes,.t
Fede.’ aL (&ttex PoLLzi t on Contjiot Ath,tini &tita.ticn
U.S. Vep nJi nes2 o Ae Ir2eit4o4
su iJ __ .1. . —. tL
Wa h4iig ton, V. C. 2024?
‘33

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4itee.t d cit .4 .bt b.k. t çty an S V G stt au)2.’Lded u.ndut See. 6,
Fede.tal Wa2en PottwtLon Contitol Ac.t(Ce.egn Wa.teA Re&to’ta.t L,n Ac..tl.
GRANTEE : Corn Products Compan y
Corporate Engineering
P.O. Box 345
A go Illinois 60501
TITLE OF PRQJE’CT : “Treatment of Wastes from the Wet-Milling Industry”
PROJECT SiTE : Pekin, Illinois PATE AWARVEV : July 24, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $482,680 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2,656,400
PROJECT NUMBER : wPRD-221-o1-( -1) -68 PPBS MO . 1206
12060 DPE
VESCRTPTIOM OF PROJECT : The 3 year project entails the design,
construction, operation, and an economic and technical evaluation
of a 1 mgd completely mixed aerobic system for treatment of corn
refining wastes.
INQUIRiES : COntzze.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OWjze o Reoea*ek amd Vevelopnen.t
Fedt’tAZ (Va. eit PoLtu.t . o Conttot Aá i n t z.tion
8/68 U.S. Ve ’.tb,en o the In .tex .Lo,t
u, u..i _ cu.r. .
Wa h.ösgton, V. C. 20Uf
.131

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkA. &kte.t de cnibu M t ty an R S P Gkaatt aMwcded ande..’v. See. 6,
Fedeiia2 (&la.tut PofLu.tJ.L n Con tJLoe Act(Cteajt Wa.t it Re4t..cn.a.t on AetI.
GRANTEE : University of Oklahoma Research Institute
1808 Newton Drive
Norman, Oklahoma 73069
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Demonstration of a Full Scale Waste Treatment
System for a Cannery”
PROJECT SITE : Stilvell, Oklahoxna VATE AWARVEV : JUL 25 1 r
FEPERAL GRANT : $75,226 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $117,807
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD-230-01-(R-l) 68 s NO . 1206
12060 DSB
VESCRIPTZON OF PROJECT : The objectives of this 18 month study will
be to conduct an economic and technical evaluation of a 1.5 mgd
bio1ogi al system employing a combination of both the minimal solids
and extended aeration techniques to treat high strength, nutritionally
unbalanced cannery wastes.
INQUIRIES : Contae.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW e o Re4eaxcA aa’4 VeveLop en.t
Fedexat Wa te.k Poth&tton Con.ttot Ath,t n . at on
U.S. Vepa. .b,en.t o the Intaioit
01 I. _ ll _ . _ IJ.UÔ
Wa4hi.ngt_on, V. C. 20242
‘35-

-------
‘ F RN4\r1oN SlIi;i:1’
l ESEARC}I •‘ D1:vI:I,opNjJ. N ( J ,\Ni
Tk ‘ e t dc ck.L1,e4 b i L,j an R 5 D G ’uutt awlvL.dc.d undcit S . 6,
Fc : z PofJji,tJ. 0 n Con ’tot Ac. .t(C ean Watvt Re. to’wJJ..on Act}.
‘ : ‘r : Fan best, Inc.
Denison, Iowa
1flL OF i?OiECT : Waste Treatment Facility, Farmbest, Inc.,
Denison, Iowa
PROJECT SITE : Denison, Iowa PATE AWARVEV : October 5, 1968
FEVE1 AL GP AWT : $239,790 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $755,587
PROJECT NLL’IBER : WPRD 2141_oi_68 PPBS NO . 1206
12060 DFF
VE.SCRIFrION OF PROJECTS
This is a 15 month project to demonstrate, over one full year of
operation, the application of anaerobic lagoons and two-stage trickling
filters for the treatment of strong wastes resulting from the slaughter-
ing and processing of hogs. This plant kills about 5000 hogs daily and
waste flows average about 0.85 mgd. Data will be collected on the
strength of wastes and the efficiency of individual treatment units
under various loadings and weather conditions so the results can be
prç)jected for new plants using any combinations of these treatment units.
INQUIRIES : Co tt.ae.t the
OW2e o Re4eLvuth. and PeveLopne,vt
Fed ML Watex PoLLLLt on Cor.ttolL Ath ôt. L tka.t opt
U.S. Vepa/i. ne.nt o the IntexLoit
UI LJ u . i.. !LIL
Wa4lthigton, V. C. 20242
/3’

-------
T )iU’i1 TION SREET
Jnne 3 L9 69
RESEARCH, DEVELOPZ€NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tr, WJ(’U (J
Th ” Pc ject. is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name arid Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
National Canners Association, Research Foundation
1133 20th Street, N.W,
Washington, D. C. 20036
Mr. Walter Mercer, NCA Western Research Laboratory
1950 Sixth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
TITLi OF PROJECT : “Evaluation of Control]ed Temperature and Forced Aeration
in Trickling Filter Treatment of Food Canning Waste Waters”
PROJECT SITE : San Jose, California
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUv ER : 12060 EAE
DATE OFFERED : May 15, 1969
OATh ACCEPTED (AWARDED):june 10, 1969 ____________ ______________
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The objectives of this project to be conducted at the
DelMonte Corporation Plant No. 3 s.t San Jose, California are as follows:
1. To evaluate the performance and BOD reduction capacity on high
strength liquid canning wastes of a 10,000 gpd trickling filter
unit containing such special features as forced aeration and
temperature control of the treatment column preceeded by grinding
and screening components.
2. To compare the efficiency of this unit with that of the trickling
filter without temperature control and forced aeration operated
under WPRD 151-01-68, by subjecting them both to identical loadings
eniinating from the same waste source.
3. To incorporate the results of this evaluation into the design of a
full scale demonstration project to be implemented in 1970. The
six month project is an extension of work initiated under WPRD 251-
01—68.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and. Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Intorior
Washington, D. C. 2O2I 2
/37
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
.rWPCA li nt
r Contr..ct
Amount
From: May 15,
1969
Thru: Nov. 15,
1969
$ 28,712
$ 18,350

-------
I N )I 1’LATI0N SHEET
6/16/69
Date tr, b’ Ncica j
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMBNT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Th Pnjeci is a CJass V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Fedc ’al Wat2r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR : Gold Kist Poultry Division
(Name and Address) Cotton Producers Association
P. 0. Box 2210
Atlanta, Georgia 30301
PROJECT DIRECTOR : Byron Hawkins
( Name and Address)Gold Kist Poultry
910 Latta Street
Durham, i4.c. 277O
TITLI OF PROJECT : “Water and Waste Management in Poultry Processing”
PROJECT SITE : Gold Kist Poultry
910 Latta Street
Durham, N.C.
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EGV
DATE OFFERED : June 12, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) : June 26, 1969
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
WPCA G nt
r Contr t
Arrioi.mt
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 6/30/71
—
$ 283,381
$198,366
DE3CRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The University of North Carolina will conduct a two year study which involves
changes in the Gold Kist processing operations for demonstration of effective
in-plant control of both water use and discharge of effluent from poultry
processing. The project encompasses water use and waste abatement throughout
the plant, from water intake through final waste-water collection and control.
INQUIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202L 1 2

-------
Ti’ : (Ji(MATION S1- ET
7/10/69
Date tr, b 1 ’Jca:.- d
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Tht Projeci. is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Federal Watcr Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
Western Potato Service, Inc.
P. 0. Box 1391 H.ighway #2 West
Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201
PROJECT DIRECTOR : James L. Martin
(Name and Address) Potato Service, Inc.
P. 0. BOx 809
Presque Isle, Maine 01. 1.769
TITL:r OF PROJECT : “Full Scale Demonstration and Evaluation of Potato Dry
and Wet Caustic Peeling Processes”
PROJECT SITE : Presque Isle Maine (Wet)
Grand Forks, North Dakota (Dry)
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NUMBER : 12060 EIG
DATE OFFEPED 7///
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED):July 22, 1969
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
The objective of-this grant will be to demons.trate at full scale the economics
and pollution reduction characteristics of a potato ?dry? caustic peeling
system and use as a base for comparison data to be obtained from a similar
facility employing the conventional “wet” caustic peeling operation.
IN UIBIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202I 2
/3
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
WPCA G ant
r Contrtct
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 1/1/71
$1,0 l.1.2,2l2
$396,571. 1.

-------
I iU 1 i iIOiI SKEET
Aiimi f. 1 1QAQ
RESEARCH, DEVELOP NT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date ‘jr, t 1 r J - rj
J’h. PcjeCi is a Class V Grant , under Section 6(b )
Fedcial Wat . r Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(i’ amc and Adaress)
Crowley’s Milk Company, Inc.
l 35 Conklin Avenue
Binghamton, N.Y. 13902
PROGR4I . (PROJECT) NIJMEER:l2060 DXF
DATE OF EFED : August 8, 1969
\ T} ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
X’WPCA ( rit
r Contr t
Amount
From: 7/1/69
Thru: 1/1/72
$91LL,081
$1 195 ,856
DE XRIPTIQj’J OF PROJECT :
A two stage Ultrafiltration system for the separation and concentration of
protein and lactose or straight acid whey concentration with a resulting
influent BOD reduction of 99% will be demonstrated. The first phase, lasting
13 months, calls for the design, detailed engineering, construction, opera-
tion and evaluation in Binghamton, N. Y. of’ a 10,000 lb/day UF system and
will include the design of a 250,000 lb/day- system for full scale demonstration
under phase II. Duration of phase II will be 17 months.
IN TJIRIES:
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202L 2
GRJ\ITEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(N inie and AddrL’ss)
TITLI OF PROJECT ,
_______________ Dr. Rob’ rt R. Zall
Director of Research & Peoduction
Crowley’s Milk Company, Inc.
l 45 Conklin Avenue
Binghamton, N. Y. 13902
iievelopment and Demonstration of an Ultrafiltration Plant for
the Abatement of Pollution from Cottage Cheese Whey”
PROJECT SITE : Ph. 1 Binghamton, New York

-------
PP 1207
M C1UNERY & TRANS RTATI0N UIP NT
12070
Letters To GPO FM
117 Johns Hopldns Univ.—Renn H. Snyder E. Dulaney
12070
1AJPRD Letters To GPO PM
, ‘,

-------
INFORMATION SfIEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
ThL4 &it€€.t an R S V G tg,t ahuvi4ed undcit Ste. 6,
tden.aL Wa. Wt PoZ1wt o ContjtoL Acl(CLta.n Wa Wt Re o’ ti .on Ae tJ.
GRJffEE : The Johns-Hopkins University, Dr. Charles E. Renn
— Department of Environmental Engineering Science
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Management of Recycled Waste-Process Water Ponds
PROJECT SITE : Hampstead, Maryland PATE AWARVEV : December 1, 1967
FEVERAL GRANT : $39,627.00 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $180,921
PROJECT NUMBER : WPI) 117-03 PP8S NO . 1207
VESCRZPTION OF PROJECT : Grant Period: 12 months
The purpose of this project is to develop detailed information on the
operational techniques required to permit the utilization of a limited
supply of’ treated domestic wastewaters for a variety of manufacturing
processes. Requirements for control of biological processes in waste-
waters impounded and recycled extensively within manufacturing processes
and operations is being investigated.
The project is being conducted at the Black and Decker Manufacturing
Companys’ Hampstead, Nd. plant.Operations in the plant involve stamping,
pressilLg, punching, grinding, forging, assembly, and performance testing
in a controlled environment requiring 2600 tons of refrigeration for air
conditioning during the w .rm months. The water supply from wells is very
limited. Domestic wastewaters are treated and routed to a nine acre
impoundment for recirculation through the plant processes and operations.
A Tho-additional-cost” time extension has been requested to permit
further evaluation through another summer season.
INQUIRiES : COIIIft Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O 4ee o Re4ea. h ar4 Vtvelopnen.t
Fe.de.M2 Wa..tek PoUat on Conttot
U.S. V antmeai t o the ln2e/Lwh
633 I’tdi4j,a Ave. N.w.
Wa6h.U gton, V. C. 2024?
ELD 3/69

-------
FF3 1208
STONE, CLAY & GLASS F3ODUCTS
12080
WP Letters To GPO PM
12080
WFRD Letters To GPO PM
87 Johns-Manville Products Corp. R. Christensen E. Dulaney

-------
LOCATION OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT INDUSTRY
PPB 120S: Stone, Clay, Glas Products
Hudson C l i
[ I
uertO R j
re Estuary
Jun 1967
U S D j1 ’.nt ,t t ,
rd .l mtq rv I Co..l.o £itzit..

-------
IN FORMATION SF1 EET
RESEARCh & JJEVELOPMENT GRANT
TL .S dcciW c2 b ’.I y ait R S V Gwt a zAdc4 andc’A S& .. 6,
F cic1 Qa Wt PaL iLio,i CorttAo Ac (C a n Wa.tc.’L Re o jx42on Act).
G A ’uTEE : Johns -Many i.llc Products Corporation
‘hnvi1le, New Jersey
fl rLE OF PROJECT : ‘ Experimental Closed Water System to Eliminate
Waste Water Discharge from Johns-Manvillc Plant No. 3•41•
P OJCCT SITE:Dcfiaflce , Ohio PATE A(UARVED:September 1, 1967
F OE L GRA VT:$82,35O TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $164,700
P?33 [ CT_flU’. 3ER:WPRp 87-01-67 PP3S NO . 1208
12b OE F
VF _ SCRIPT1O 1 OF PIWJECT :
This project is designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of a
total process-water reuse system involving diatomite filtration to
treat wastes from the production of glass fiber insulations and
elcoents.
Th objective of this project is to eliminate completely the
discharge of phenolic waste water from the Johns-Manville Plant. The
plant now discharges 30 to 50 9pm of waste water which eventually
flows into the Maurnee River. This river has been cited as one of
the critically polluted rivers of the nation.
The waste water now contains glass fiber, caustic, and phenols.
As a part of the project, all of the process waste water will be
rc circulated. The residual solids, consisting of glass fibers and
phenolic binders, will be removed by screening and diatomite
filtration. Caustic cleaning solutions will be segregated from
the ranufacturing process water, ponded, and treated as required
for dumping or for return to plant process use.
PR X3RESS TO MARCH 25, 1968 : Approval to purchase certain long-lead items
of equipment on low bids has been given with repayment subject to appro-
val of the final plans and specifications. The final plans and specifica-
tions are complete except for theelectrical wiring and should be submitted
for approval within two weeks.
j! !QUlRIES : Con. a c2 th _ Industrial Po .lution Cont ol nch
o Re q.&ch ar4 P v opn
Fc .d uzL (‘Ja e/ PoIJutLon Coittwl AththtL tka..tZon
ELD:3/68 U.S. Vcpvii n g6 . th l tWr.Lon

-------
1’PB 1209
TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS
12090
Letters To GPO PN
ECU N. Carolina State U. H. Snyder C. Ris
ECS Cleinsbn U. — Porter D. Hill C. Ris
EOX Clemson U. — Porter A. Garrison C. Ris
1’ PRD Letters To GPO PH
100 EUX Fiber Industries R. Thacker C. Ris
216 ESG American Enka Corp. E. Lomasney C. Ris
IY ,qM C. H. Maslaxid & Sons D. Smith C. Ris
/47

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR FIRER & FINISHIM INDUSTPIES
PPB 1209: Textiles MIII Products
ng land
i: De!aware Estuary

t antiC
fPuerto Ricoj I Virgin I
I c I
! nds I
June ¶ S7
U. S. o t ’e
?. ‘.vaI W te, P ue Co& oI A

-------
INFORMATION ShEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL4 4!tee d c Lbe4 bJt.L Ly an R £ V G cji t c. ) VLdc.rt und t S . 6,
Fedvt& C kz/ e.’t Poi.& t’on Coi’2itoZ Ac (C.ee n Ct’ te1L Re o’wJ_- .on Act).
GRAWTEE : North Carolina State University
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
TITLE OF_PROJECT: “Textile Based Water Pollution-Information Studyl
PROJECT SITE : Raleigh, North Carolina PATE A JA .VEV : May 9, 1969
FEVE AL GRA !T:$i0,I.i iO TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $12,638
P OJ CT !W ER: 12090 ECU PPBS NO . 1209
VESCRiPT1O?! 0i PROJECT :
Collection of, abstracting and indexing all available literature dealing
with water pollution from textile based sources, and preparation and
storage of this information into the Water Resources Scientific Information
System. Correlate information between the Water Resources Scientific
Informatio Center, USD1, the M.I.T..Textile Center and the Shirley
Institute thesauri.
Project Duration: 8 months
1NQ, UIRIES : Con.tact .the. Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O Lec 06 Re vtc.h a . ’4 V v 2opneit.t
Fec’a. C’ .’cJ .CiL PoUwU ei Con.t’tot Ac .&vLWuttZon
U.S. P pc .& ttt o tk . InW .. Lo
633 IncL&zncz Avz. N.(’).
Wa4h.&z9ton, V. C. 20242
H (/4/69 /4?

-------
INi0itM TION SHEET
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date fr) b llc’1ca cd
This Pc ject is a Class I Grant_, under Section 5 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
•1
Department of Textiles
School of IN & IS
Clemson University
Clemson. S.C. 29631
Dr. John J. Porter
PROJECT SITE : Clemson University
From: July
1969
Thru: une
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The study will include characterization of the
liquid wastes ftom the major manufacturing processes as to composi-
tion and quantity per unit of production . identify successful and
unsuccessful treatment processes and disposal practices presently in
use . and suggest alternatives for least satisfactory practices.
The study will be directed towards identifying areas most in need of
research and those areas where research effort is most likely to
yield beneficial results.
tNQUIRIES:
E LD
6/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Intcrior
Washington, D. C. 202142
/30
GRANTEE OR CONTRACTOR:
( Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
2ITLr OF PROJECT : Survey of the State of the Art of Textile Waste
Treatment
PROGRAM (PROJECT) NIJMBER:12090 ECS
DATE OFFERED : June 20, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED ) : June 24, 1969
Grant
or
Eligible
‘WPCA G nt
Contract
Grant
r Contr *ct
Period
Period
Costs
Aino nt
l
30
$ 31. 675
$30 . 007

-------
TWIOHMATION S} ET
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, OR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Date tn b• 1 ’Icqccd
This Pcoject is a Research Grant , under Section 5
Federal Watcr Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Restoration Act).
4
Department of Textiles; School of ThI&TS; Clemson,
University; Clemson, South Carolina 29631
TITLr OF PROJECT : A Study of the Photochemical Degradation of Commercial Dyes
PROJECT SITE : Clemson University; Clemson, South Carolina
PROGRAM (PI OJECT) Nt1 1BER : 12090 E )X
DATE OFFERED : July 22, 1969
DATE ACCEPTED (AWARDED) :
August 20, 1969
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
Grant or
Contract
Period
Eligible
Grant
Period Costs
‘WFCA G unt
)r Contr. ct
Amount
From: 8/1/69
Thzi.i: 7/31/70
3 4,0 4O
$31,539
The objectives of this 12 month research project are to define and characterize
the products of decomposition resulting from ultraviolet radiation of selected
commercial textile cries. The characterization will include aistir.cuishing
between photochemical and hydrolytically produced decomposition products.
IN tJIRIES:
Cffl
7/69
Contact Project Coordination
Office of Research and Development
Federal Water Pollution Control Admini.stration
U. S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D. C. 202142
GRMTEE OR CONTRACTOR :
(Name and Address)
PROJECT DIRECTOR :
(Name and Address)
Dr. John J. Porter, Department of Textiles
Clerson University, Clemson, South Carolina
‘:: • •)
‘-j; Q )
/5/

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkIA &heet dac be4 bt Ls4Ly an R 5 0 Glta,tt ai wcde4 u.ndex Sec. 6,
FedQ.ML Wate.n. PoLtwtLon Co,ttn ot Act(Ct Lz1t Wa tut Re4tolta.tLon Act).
GRANTEE : ‘iber Industries, Inc.
Box 10038
Charlotte, North Carolina 28201
TITLE OF PROJECT : Reuse of Plant Effluent and Cooling Water Blowdown as
Process Water.
PROJECT SITE : Shelby, North Carolina DATE AWARVEV : Apiil 4, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $350,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $500,000
PROJECT NUM8ER: T , rP 1 J 100-01-68 pp NO . 1209
1 090 EUX
DESCRIPTiON OF PROJECT : An existing facility provides treatment for the
combined sanitary and equalized chemical process waste waters from a syn-
thetic fiber manufacturing plant. Treatment facilities consist of extended
activated sludge aeration basins, clarifier, polishing ponds, an aerobic
sludge digestion basin, and a sludge holding pond.
The project will evaluate treatability of this waste in a plastic media
trickling filter, feasibility of algae removal from the polishing pond ef-
fluent by use of inicroscreen filters, feasibility of BOD, COD, color, odor
and taste reduction in the final effluent by use of powdered carbon for the
purpose of ultimate reuse of the effluent as process makeup water, and
chromate reduction of cooling tower blowdown to permit treatment in the waste
treatment plant.
INQ UIRIES : Con.ta.c..t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OW ce o Reoeatch. amd VeveLop iestt
FedeMZ Wa.te.t PoUu.tLon Con.t’toL Athn nL&t’tatLon
U.S. PepaUment o At
ELD 7/68 1” LLdLIJ1I V’L. L !L .
Waahth to,i, P. C. 20242
/5 Z

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki4 4hu.t de cn4.ba b ti.t ty an R s V tastt a 4ed wtdvL See. 6,
Fede’w2 WtWt PoUutJj n Con.tftot Ac . (Ctwt Wa2e/t Reot,oMJion Ac. t).
GRANTEE : American nkR . Corporation
Enka, North Carolina
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Zinc Precipitation and Recovery Plant”
PROJECT SITE: Enk , North Carolina PATE AWARVEV : May 24, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $282, i’oo TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $980, 1i l7
PROJECT NUMBER : WPED-2].6-Ol-(R-l)-68 PPBS NO . 1209
12090 ESG
VESCRZPTTON OF PROJECT : The objectives of this 20 month full scale
demonstration project to remove soluble zinc emitted from spin bath
operations in the manufacture of viscose ra ron are as follows:
1. To direct waste streams containing significant a nounts
of zinc into the existing 200 gpm chemical precipitation
and recovery Byetem.
2. Improve the q uality of both the zinc sludge produced in
the recovery system and the final effluent to enable
their reuse in the manufacturing process.
3. Optimize the system.
li. Utilize the technolo r developed in the design, construction
and operation of a new zinc precipitation and recovery system.
INQ LIIRlES : Con a .t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
OW2e o Re eax&t. amd Vevelopneitt
FedeML ( ex PoUutJ.on ContitoL AMàLL6tta.tLon
8/68 U.S. Pept .bte*t o the I,tttt o4
Jlfl LJ- _ .L.. LU .
Wa4k.ôtgto.I, V. C. 20242
/5-3
A

-------
PPB 1210
LUNBER & OD PRODUCTS
12100
Letters To PM
1320 EBG Oregon St. Univ. Schaumburg K. Willard G. Webster
WPRD
174 Kiamath Plywood Corp. K. Willard G. Webster

-------
LOCATION OF MAJOR SAW 1{tLLS & PLANN1L’ G IL1S
PPB 1210: Lumber & Wood Products
d
usquehanna
June 19 37
Hudson Champ!
re Estuary
1H I
L uerto RICO Virgin
I Islands ]
U. S c’ r I ’ (’
?edt,aI % ,e, Po .e Cc’ roI Ad i.sr. o,

-------
INFORMATION SIIEET——
RESEARCh & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TJZL S 4he e dt e be .. b .L? Ly an R V Mil atwtde d tu1d? t S . 6,
Fede’t ’2 Wadtv . Po Zwt’.o L Coi t&oZ C Ct’ te .n. Re o’to$’on Ac 1.
GP..A ffEE : Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon 97331
TITLE OF PiWjECT : “Influence of Log Rafting on Water Quality”
PROJECT SiTE : Corvallis, Oregon PATE AC’I’ARVEV : May 15, 1969
—— and Vicinity
FEVERAL G A’Th $20,557 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2l,639-2nd yr.
PROJECT :u’ ER : 12100 EBG PP8S NO . 1210
(Formerl T WP-1320) —_____
PESCR1VI1O)! OF P2OJECT :
The major objectives of this project are to:
Determine the quantity and character of substances leached from logs
while floating in water; determine the rate and extent at which leached
substances are degraded biologically; determine debris under and in
the vicinity of log rafting and storage areas; evaluate the rate and
extent of aerobic and anerobic biodegradation of the benthol deposits;
and determine the extent of log raft storage at selected locations in
the Pacific northwest and using data obtained from the above experiments
evaluate the potential contribution of raft storage to water pollution
in those areas. -
Con tac.. Jie Industrial Pollution Control Branch-DAST
OUi o R jvu h a’.d V v 2o neji.t
Fedc.’LcLZ Wa tejt PoLCu,tjjni Con oZ Ath,iOz.LWta.Uon
U• • Vc pc : ra o .th i v e. Lo t
•____________
GRW 11j69 /5•7

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 4hee.t de cit Lb s b &ief , y an R S V G.’wjt. 1’. JLde.d c.uuie.t Sc . 6,
Fc4exo2 Wa .t x PoUwt .on Contjto.e Ac (Cf w.n Wa te1L Re o toiux.thyn Act).
GRAWTEE : Kiamath Plywood Corporation
P 0. Box 1239
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97601
TITLE OF P1 OJECT :
“Aerobic Secondary Treatment of Plywood Glue Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Kiamath Falls, Oregon PATE ACQAIWEV : APR 191968
FEVaRAL G! A JT : $42,028 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $65,040
PROJECT ?1W i8ER : WPRD 174-01-(H1)-68 ‘8S NO . 1210
PESCR?PTION OF P2OJECT :
The project objectives of this grant are to design, construct, operate
and evaluate an extended aeration, activated sludge lagoon treatment
plant on urea-formaldehyde glue wastes in order to provide data for
others to utilize in efforts to abate water pollution.
INQUIRiES : Con tac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OJ 06 Re. e ai ch a d V veLop ivv
FeLiVU1L Wa tcfr. PofJu tLon Con.tjtoZ Adnti, tion
8/68 t n n.t c, t,’tc. I,tteiLLo’L
U I LL t L
Wa4hi ..ng ton, V. C. 20242

-------
PPB 1212
OTHERS
12120
Letters To PM
1284 U. of Kentucky - Grieves E. Dulaney
1535 ERC Res. Fdn. - AWWA-Faber W. Lacy W. Lacy
99 DOD Renoselear Poly-Lulenbech R. Keppler G. Rey
185 U. of Cincinnati — E re E. Harris G. Webster
199 DIK U. of Virginia — Parker H. Snyder G. Webster
WPRD
25 EFM Caldwefl Lace Leather Co. J. Westrick G. Webster
133 A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. T. Murphy G. Webster
232 DSG S. B. Foot Tanning Co. C. Oster G. Webster
/5?

-------
INFORMATION SHEET-”-
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 4hee.t dec 1 tthe4 bn.. t Ly an R S V G.tant auwided wuie. See. 5,
FedMa.L ( .te.’L PoUu. Aj,n Con.t’tot Ac.t(CLwt 1 ktte Re4toM.tLon Ac t).
GRANTEE : University of Kentucky
Research Foundation
Professor Robert B. Grieves
TITLE OF PROJECT:F08111 Separation Flotation of Colloid Organic Systems
PROJECT SiTE : Lexington, Kentucky PATE ALMRVEV : January 1, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $35,174 - 2nd year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $54,600
PROJECT NUMBER : -0l284 02 PPBS MO . 1212
VESCRJPT1ON OF PROJECT : The overall objective of this investigation is
the establishment of’ definite design criteria for specific, continuous
foam separation processes. The processes will include foam fractiona-
tion-flotation of colloidal and soluble iron from water supplies, the
ion flotation of hexavalent chromium from plating wastes, the foam
fractionation of suiphite and lignin-containing waste from pulp and
paper mills, and the ion flotation of free and complexed cyanide. The
processes will be conducted on a continuous flow basis. An economic
evaluation will be carried out and definite recommendations on the ap-
plicability of each process will be made.
INQUIRiES : Contact th Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
OW2e o Raea h. aaid DeveLop ient
n ,I 8/68 F dtxaL Wate’t PoLZut on Cont’tot Ath’iüeA tta.tLon
U.S. Vepo .tt,tent o At
fl 14L. _ t - - HJL. .
Wa4hôtgton, V. C. 2024f

-------
INIFORMA’rIoN SHEET—--
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tkt4 sliee..t de4c ..tLb b.tLt ty an R V G a,tt auv ded undv Ser. .5
F de .ka.L (UatvL PoLtwCj on Co vt toe Ac.t(Ctegn Wa. te.’t Reo o’tation Act).
GRANTEE : Research Foundation, American Water Works Association.
TiTLE OF PROJECT : Disposal of Wastes from Water Treatment Plants.
PROJECT SiTE : New York, N. y. PATE ALIJARVEV : July 25, 1968
FEVERAL GRANT : $46,305 TOTAL ES ? . PROJ. COST : $53 25o
PROJECT NUMBER : WP-1535-0l-69 PPBS NO . 1212
12120 ERC
VESCRIPflON OF PROJECT :
Preparation of a “State of the Arts” report on current practices and
costs of disposing of sludges generated by water treatment plants.
The results of this 12 month project will be used to develop a program
for research and development needs for these significant problems of
solids addition to watercourses.
IP4QUIRIES : C pttg the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O ij e o Resea* k amd VeueLopntn
8/68 Fedvt .aZ Wa.ten PoLZutJon Con.ttot Aánàti .. titatL*
U.S. Vep & e*t o the Inteju.cn
N! b LL..... , .. IJ•JJ•
Wa h.Lngton, P. C. 2024!
1(0/

-------
INFORMATION SIIIEET —
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL 4heet de.4c,t. bt b 4 t Zy an R S V Gwzt awi..tded undex Se. . 5,
Fede. a Wa.Wt PoLtutLon ContJLot Ac (CUan Wa2e/t Re on17..t on Ac 21.
GRAJ ( TEE : RensselaeD Polytechnic Institute
Research Division
Troy, New York 12181
TiTLE OF PROJECT : “Removal of Syndets and Reclamation of Laundry Wastes”
PROJECT SITE : Troy, New York VATE A ARVEV : January 24, 1969
FEVERAL GRANT:$25,055 TOTAL E.ST. PROJ. COST : $53,090
PROJECT NUMBER : 12120 DØD pp NO . 1212
PESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :
To optimize and evaluate the best process or combination of
processes attainable for the treatment and recovery of laundromat
wasterwaters. Two connnercially available treatment systems for
laundromat wastewaters are to be used in the optimization and
evaluation project. The needs required to produce waste effluents
suitable for discharge to New York State receiving waters, and the
treatment requirements to produce reusable water for laundroinats
will be determined and demonstrated.
TNQUIRIES : Conta the Industrial Pollution Control Branch
o Re . ean ch and VeveLop ien.t
F de/uit Wa.Wt PoLtu.tAon ContitoZ Adjnôij iuWon
U.S. VepadttJnen t o the Inten. c
U I F ITh i t’r _
Wa4Ithtgt4 n, V. C. 20242

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TItj& 4he,j de4ctLbe6 bkLt ty au R £ V Gtau.t aiw..n4ed widex Sec. 4
Fede.ttxL (i Wt Potlu.tjj,n ConfJLOt Ac.t(Ce eait wadtelL Re IonMJ..on Act).
GRANTEE : University of Cincinnati
Professor J. David Eye
TITLE OF PROJECT : Treatment of Total Wastes from a Sole Leather Tannery
PROJECT SiTE : Marlinton, West Virgini 1 AWARPEV : May 1, 1968
FEDERAL GRANT : $29,325 - 2nd year TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $166,000
PROJECT NUMBER : 1PIPD 185-02-68 ppg p 1212
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : The basic objective of this project is the com-
plete treatment of the total wastes stemming from a large sole leather
tannery. During the first year the bewnhouse waste fractions were
effectively separated and pretreated. During the second year of this
grant the pretreated beamhouse waste will be blended with spent tan
liquor and then treated in a series of stratified anaerobic—aerobic
lagoons.
INQUIRiES : Cor ac.t tht 1 du tria1 Polluton Control Branch, DEl)
d ce o Ra t aad VeueLop teut
RN 6/68 FedeM2 W te& Pot&&t4on Cont&cL Aán n.Lot at on
U.S. Vt*n$j,eu.t o the Inte4w4
ill LJL _ .L.... !JrVr
Wa6k.ôigton, V. C. 20247
“3

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Tki.4 Lhee2 de.oc ti..be4 Em t y ait R 5 V G .aivt au ded wtdut See. 6;
FedQA4Lt ( .tex PoUwtLon ContJLot Act(Cteast Wa,t t Re4 oM.t Dn Ae.t).
GRANTEE:university of Virginia
Department of Civil Engineering
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
TITLE OF PROJECT:An Anaerobic-Aerobic Lagoons for Treating Vegetable
Tannins
January 18, 1969
PROJECT SITE : Luray, Virginia PATE AWARVEP: - U -
FEDERAL GRANT : $17,801 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $68,500
PROJECT NUMBER : 12120 DIK PPBS NO . 1212
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT:The objective of this project is to demonstrate
that the wastes from the bating, soaking, tanning, and bleaching
processes in a vegetable tannery can be effectively treated by means
of an anaerobic-aerobic lagoon. The wastes are to be equalized and
combined prior to entering the lagoon. The lagoon is to be operated
under varying conditions of aeration and BOD loading in order to
determine optimum design parameters.
lP4Q UIRlES : Contae.t At Industrial Pollution Control Branch
O i..ce o Re an . h av4 Vtuelop’tu.t
FedttaL Watui. PoLLu.t .Lon Confjtot Athnü4 a.t i n
U.S. PeaMmeitt o the Iiu e,ti.o’t
iii LiILIIU ‘t. r:”. —
Wa hA.n to t, V. C. 2024?

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Th44 4het.t deoc,tiLbe4 b t y an R S V G’taitt a wj, 4 ’4 undex Sec. 6,
FedeM2 (L .tvt PoUutLon Co ttxoL Ac (Ctwt WaLe/t Re o’w..t. on Aet).
GRANTEE : Caidwell Lace Leather Company
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Complete Treatment of Tarmery Industrial Waste for
Chrome Tanning, Alum Tanning, and Vegetable Tanning”
PROJECT SITE : Auburn, Kentuck r PATE AWARVEV : December, 1966
FEVERAL GRjJJT : $46,340 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $6 ,200
PROJECT WLLMSER : WPRD 25-01-67
_____________ PPBS NO . 1212
12120 EFM
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : No completely satisfactory method has been de-
vised for treating tannery industrial waste. Since tanneries use large
volumes of water, containing organic and inorganic matter, su.itable treat-
ment methcds must be found.
The objectives of the project are to demonstrate the feasibility of com-
pletely treating tannery waste from the only plant in U.S. that tans all
three types of leather tannages - Chrome, Vegetable and Alum - and to
obtain basic data to design full-scale treatment plants usable for any
tannery.
The basic plan is to develop methods to pre-treat the three present leather
tannages, to combine their streams, and to completely treat tannery indus-
trial waste. The high alkaline content of beam house waste will be neu-
tralized with high acid made up of various tannages. The organic solids
will be reduced in an anaerobic-aerobic lagoon.
INQUIRIES : Cont.ac.t the Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O ice o Re eaj,.ch aid VeveLop vt.t
FedeML Wa teit PoUu.tJ.on Cont’r.ot A nàvLWta.t on
GW 1/67 U.S. Pepa/L eeiLt o the Inte./uok
UI IJ.L _ 1 ,, U.U.-
Wa h4ngtcn, V. C. 2024?
“5- ,

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
Thu ahee.t de. cjc2beo b t 4 R g V G aitt aMwLdf4 undek See. 6,
FedeAaL ( te.t PoZ2wtAj n Con.tftot Ae.t(Ctwt CUa.Wt R oM.t&rn Aet).
GRANTEE : A.C. Lawrence Leather Company, Division of Swift &
Company, 10-18 Sawyer Street
Peabody, Massachusetts
TITLE OF PROJECT:”wastewater Treatment Pilot Plant Investigation,
Mixed airome Tannery Wastewater”
PROJECT SiTE : South Paris, Maine DATE AWARDED : 8/30/67
FEDERAL GRANT:$8 7 ,215 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $124,593
PROJECT e 4UMBER : WPRD-133-01-68 PP8S MO . 1212
DESCRiPTiON OF PROJECT : The objectives of tF a oject are as follows:
1) To demonstrate on a pilot plant scale the primary and
secondary treatment, by the activated sludge process,
of mixed chrome tannery wastewaters aixi sanitary sewage.
2) To demonstrate the.pre-treatment of the tannery wastewater
by carbonation with flue-gas and up-flow sedimentation in
order to remove excess calcium, chromium, and sulfides.
3) To demonstrate the benefits of mixing municipal sanitary
sewage with tannery wastewaters to provide the biological
nutrients lacking in tannery wastes.
4) To determine design criteria for a scale up to a full
scale demonstration plant and to provide a basis for
estimating çhe costs of construction and operation of a
full scale plant.
5) To determine optimum methods of dewatering sludge, with
primary emphasis on concentration by centrifugation, with
aim being to dewater sufficiently to dispose of solids as
sanitary land fill.
INQ.UIRTES : Cont .e.t thq. Industrial Pollution Control Branch, DED
O 4 e 06 Reua. k amd VeueLopnen.t
Fed vcd Watex PoLLu.ti on Contiwt Aánüt43t ta.tAon
11.5. Dep 4.O,,e,t o the Inte. ok
/ •,i uJ _ .... .t. . r: -w .
G 1 10 68 4Jtg t0,t V. C. 20242
1

-------
INFORMATION SHEET——
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GRANT
TkL sheet dc c.tib bn Ly an R S V G.ta,tt a 4ed und .’t Se . 6,
FedvtaL ( ,kL e..’L PotJi JJon Cont’toL Ac1(Cteait Wa.WL Re.o on.a.tion Act).
GRANTEE : S. B. Foot Tanning Company
Red ‘. 1ing, Minnesota
TITLE OF PROJECT : “Aerobic Biological Treatment, Sludge Dewatering
and Disposal and Effluent Reuse for a Side Leather
Tannery t ’
PROJET SiTE : Red Wing, Minnesota PATE AWARVEV : May 15, 1968
FEPERAL GRANT : $475,000 TOTAL EST. PROJ. COST : $2,046,268
PROJECT NUMBER : WPRD 232 PP&S NO . l2
12120 DSG
VESCRIPTIOM OF PROJECT :
The four year proj ect wi].l provide a full scale demonstration and
Investigation of primary sedimentation, biological secondary treatment
utilizing aerated lagoons, and primary and secondary sludge dewatering
and disposal by means of pressure filtration and Incineration. The
system will treat the total waste flow of 2.1 MGD from the side leather
tannery. In addition an evaluation will be conducted to determine
the influence of final treatment plant effluent reuse on hide processing
and quality of the finished product by reusing it in the “limepaddle”
and “wash soak” tanning operations.
INQLUIRTES : Cc,ttdc..t the INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL BRANCH, DED
- O iLe o R ean h asid Veve1opr it .t
Fede.’t Z Wa.Wt PoZLut4on Cont wt Ath,it’ a.t on
8 oo u.s. p at men.t o . tite . IntJ oit
U I.JL _ .. .L,... JI.LI .
Wa.ohiiigto t, 0. C. 20242
Jf;7

-------