U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIRS
PROVIDENCE COUNTY
RHODE ISLAND
EPA REGION I
WORKING PAPER No, 28
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIRS
PROVIDENCE COUffJY
RHODE ISLAND
EPA REGION I
WORKING PAPER No, 28
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
RHODE ISLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND THE
RHODE ISLAND NATIONAL GUARD
SEPTEMBER,
-------
1
CO NTE MIS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Rhode Island Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Introduction 5
III. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 6
IV. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
V. Nutrient Loadings 14
VI. Literature Reviewed 19
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national , reqional , and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ 1O6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Rhode Island Division of
Water Supply and Pollution Control for professional involvement
and to the Rhode Island National Guard for conduct of the tribu-
tary sampling phase of the Survey.
Carleton A. Maine, Chief, and James W. Fester, Principal
Sanitary Engineer of the Rhode Island Division of Water Supply
and Pollution Control ,provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the course of the Survey.
Major General Leonard Holland, the Adjutant General of Rhode
Island, and Project Officer Colonel Clarence Bozar, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Rhode Island National Guardsmen, are
also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Harris Pond Providence, RI;
Worchester, MA
Slatersville Reservoir Providence, RI
Turner Reservoir Providence, RI;
Bristol , MA
-------
Rhode Island
WORCESTER_CO. MASS. ____
PROVIDENCE CO. RHODE ISLAND
SLATERSVILLE
RESERVOIRS
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Samplina Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
2 Miles
-------
SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIRS
STORET NO. 4402
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
The moderate nutrient levels and the relatively low algal
assay control yield indicate the Slatersville Reservoirs are
only mildly eutrophic. However, heavy spring algal blooms have
been reported in both Reservoirs, and the lower Reservoir re-
portedly has abundant submerged vegetation.
It is evident that the very short hydraulic retention time
is suppressing the effects of high nutrient loading rates and
preventing the occurrence of frequent and prolonged nuisance
conditions.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results show the Reservoirs were phosphcrus
limited at the time the assay sample was collected.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—-During the sampling year, the Slaters-
yule Reservoirs received a total phosphorus load at a rate over
two times greater than that proposed by Vollenweider (in press)
as a “dangerous” rate; i.e., a eutrophic rate (see page 18).
The Zambarano Memorial Hospital (Wallum Lake Sanitarium)
wastewater treatment plant is the only known point source
contributing to the Slatersville Reservoirs at this time, and
-------
2
this source contributed less than 20 percent of the phosphorus
load to the Reservoirs at the point of discharge . Moreover,
Wilson Reservoir and at least seven other lesser impoundments
provided phosphorus entrapment and/or biological assimilation
in the 12 or so stream miles between the treatment plant dis-
charge point and upper Slatersville Reservoir, so the amounts
of phosphorus from this source that reached the Reservoirs must
be considerably less than the indicated 1,670 pounds during the
sampling year. Even if the entire phosphorus load from the plant
actually reached the Reservoirs, complete removal of phosphorus
at that source would only reduce the loading rate to about 42
lbs/acre/yr or 4.7 g/ni 2 /yr (a rate still about twice the eutrophic
rate). Therefore, it is unlikely that phosphorus removal at the
Hospital treatment plant would result in any appreciable improve-
ment in the trophic condition of the Slatersville Reservoirs.
The engineering firm of CE Maguire, Inc., Providence, RI, has
prepared plans for a regional sewerage system to serve all of the
population centers of the township of Burriliville with construc-
tion scheduled to begin during 1976 (Hoernle, 1973). The acti-
vated sludge plant serving the system will be located at the vil-
lage of Whipple, and the effluent will be discharged to the
Pascoag (Clear) River about five stream miles above Upper Slaters-
ville Reservoir.
-------
3
As presently planned, the Burriliville system does not include
phosphorus removal ; but by the time the design population of 8,500
persons is being served, the system will have about tripled the
existing phosphorus loading to the Slatersville Reservoirs (assuming
20% removal of 3.5 lbs P/capita/yr). A phosphorus load of that
magnitude will certainly affect the trophic condition of the Reser-
voirs; and provision of phosphorus removal or a high degree of
operation of the treatment plant will be necessary if deterioration
of the present trophic condition of the Reservoirs is to be pre-
vented.
Although the protection of public health that will be provided
by the regional system is of primary importance, consideration should
be given to inclusion of phosphorus removal during one of the later
stages of system development unless it has been determined that
operation of the activated-sludge treatment plant results in satis-
factory phosphorus removal
2. Non-point sources--The nutrient exports of Trout Brook and
Tarkiln Brook (see page 18) compare well with those of unimpacted
Quick Brook at nearby Harris Pond (see Working Paper No. 27, “Report
on Harris Pond”); however, the exports of the Branch River were much
higher.
Assuming the means of the exports of Trout Brook and Tarkiln
Brook are representative of non-point nutrient contributions in the
- £I1C
0
-------
4
drainage, the excess contributions of the Branch River (66 lbs
P and 666 lbs N/mi 2 /yr) are attributable to unmeasured point
sources. For the year, then, unmeasured point sources in the
Branch River drainage contributed about 4,900 lbs of phosphorus
(47% of the total P load) and about 49,100 lbs of nitrogen (25% of
the total N load).
-------
5
II. INTRODUCTION
The Slatersville Reservoirs were formed in the 1800’s by two
impoundments of the Branch River to provide water power for the Slater
Textile Mill (se map, page v). The Mill has since been converted to
light manufacturing, and the water power is no longer utilized.
The Reservoirs are relatively shallow but do support some fishing.
Largemouth bass and yellow perch are the most common species in the
lower Reservoir, while black crappies predominate in the upper Reser-
voir where species diversity and growth rates are reported to be
somewhat better. Public access is rather limited at both Reservoirs,
and little other recreational use is made of the water bodies.
The shorelines of both Reservoirs are in private ownership and
are mostly wooded and undeveloped except for the eastern two-thirds
of the north shoreline of the lower Reservoir. Most of the homes
in this area are set well back from the shoreline.
The drainage area is characterized by mixed coniferous and
deciduous forests with little agricultural use. Most of the urban-
ized areas lie along the Pascoag, Clear, and Branch rivers in the
township of Burriliville. It is estimated that 70 percent of the
township population of about 10,000 persons lives in these urban
areas.
-------
6
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry*:
1. Surface area: 207 acres.
2. Mean depth: 8 feet.
3. Maximum depth: 23 feet.
4. Volume: 1,656 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 5 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name Drainage area** Mean flow**
Branch River 73.7 mi 2 128.5 cfs
Trout Brook 2.5 mi 2 4.3 cfs
Tarkiln Brook 9.2 mi 2 16.0 cfs
Minor tributaries & 2
immediate drainage - 4.1 mi 7.7 cfs
Totals 89.5 mi 2 156.5 cfs
2. Outlet -
Branch River 89.7 mi 2 ±T 156.5 cfs
C. Precipitationtt:
1. Year of sampling: 56.8 inches.
2. Mean annual: 40.4 inches.
Anonymous, 1970.
** Drainage areas are accurate within ±1%; gaged flows are accurate within
±15%; and ungaged flows are accurate within ±20%.
-f Includes area of Reservoirs; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
tt See Working Paper No. 1, Survey Methods’s.
-------
7
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
The Slatersville Reservoirs were sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the Reservoirs and from one or more depths at each sta-
tion (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phyto-
plankton identification and enumeration; and during the last visit, a sin-
gle five-gallon depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays.
Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the
stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 4
feet at station 1, 10 feet at station 2, and 15 feet at station 3.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the
data for the fall sampling period, when the Reservoirs were essentially
well-mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc sum-
mary is based on all values. Although the results were similar in value
and pattern, summaries are provided for each Reservoir as well as for
the combined results.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times,
refer to Appendix B.
-------
8
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
1. UPPER SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR -
FALL VALUES
(10/06/72)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature (Cent.) 14.1 15.0 14.6 16.3
Dissolved oxygen (mg/i) 9.6 10.1 10.2 10.5
Conductivity (pmhos) 90 98 91 108
pH (units) 6.6 6.9 6.8 7.1
Alkalinity (mg/i) 10 13 10 25
Total P (mg/i) 0.027 0.033 0.033 0.038
Dissolved P (mg/i) 0.009 0.011 0.012 0.013
NO + NO (mg/i) 0.050 0.322 0.320 0.820
Anii onia nig/l) 0.070 0.208 0.080 0.730
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches) 54 55 55 56
2. LOWER SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR -
FALL VALUES
(10/06/72)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature 16.0 16.1 16.1 16.2
Dissolved oxygen 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.4
Conductivity 91 92 91 93
pH 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.6
Alkalinity 10 10 10 10
Total P 0.029 0.032 0.032 0.036
Dissolved P 0.009 0.011 0.010 0.014
NO + NO 0.080 0.110 0.120 0.130
Am onia 0.080 0.173 0.210 0.230
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc
45 45
45 45
-------
9
3. COMBINED DATA -
FALL VALUES
(10/06/7 2)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature 14.1 15.4 16.0 16.3
Dissolved oxygen 7.2 9.0 9.6 10.5
Conductivity 90 95 91 108
pH 6.4 6.7 6.6 7.1
Alkalinity 10 12 10 25
Total P 0.027 0.032 0.032 0.038
Dissolved P 0.009 0.011 0.011 0.014
NO + NO 0.050 0.242 0.125 0.820
Am onia 0.070 0.195 0.080 0.730
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc
40 53
56 66
-------
10
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Number
Date Genera per nil
06/04/72 1 . Flagellates 391
2. Anabaena 228
3. Cryptomonas 145
4. Tabellaria 119
5. Raphidiopsis 61
Other genera 188
Total 1,132
08/01/72 1 . Chroococcus 384
2. Microcystis 309
3. Merismopedia 286
4. Fragilaria 241
5. Dinobryon 151
Other genera 852
Total 2,223
10/06/72 1. Dictyosphaerium 1,175
2. Cryptomonas 663
3. Flagellates 376
4. Scenedesmus 301
5. Synedra 211
Other genera 1,114
Total 3,840
-------
11
2. Chlorophyll a -
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/i )
06/04/72 01* 11.7
02* 6.4
03** 2.3
01
02
03
01
02
03
7.9
4.6
4.1
4.6
16.9
14.4
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
0.2
0.7
2.3
3.4
2.9
15.0
0.1
08/01/72
10/06/72
C. Limiting Nutrient Study (combined upper and lower Reservoir sample):
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N
___________ Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i ) _____________
0.008 0.220
0.014 0.220
0.020 0.220
0.032 0.220
0.068 0.220
0.068 10.220
0.008 10.220
Spike (mg/i ) ________ _________ _____________
Control
0.006 p
0.012 P
0.024 P
0.060 P
0.060 P + 10.0 N
10.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicates a relatively low level of potential pri-
mary productivity in the Reservoirs at the time the sample
was collected. Also, the increased yields with increased
* tipper Reservoir.
** Lower Reservoir.
-------
12
levels of orthophosphorus (to about 0.032 mg/i) show that the
Reservoirs were phosphorus limited at that time (note that the
addition of only nitrogen resulted in a yield not significantly
different from the control yield).
Field data confirm the conclusion that the Reservoirs gen-
erally are phosphorus limited. With the exception of the June
sample from the lower Reservoir (station 03), all samples showed
nitrogen/phosphorus ratios of 14 to 1 or greater (i.e., phos-
phorus limitation would be expected). However, the June sample
at station 03 showed a N/P ratio of about 9 to 1, indicating a
slight nitrogen limitation at that time.
-------
13
D. Trophic Condition:
Data obtained during the Survey indicate both Reservoirs
are mildly eutrophic. Nutrient concentrations were generally
moderate, and the algal assay indicated a relatively low level
of potential primary productivity at the time the assay sam-
ple was collected. However, the moderately high chlorophyll a
and low Secchi disc transparencies are indicative of a more
eutrophic condition.
Heavy spring algal blooms have been reported in both Reser-
voirs, and abundant growths of submerged vegetation occur in
the lower Reservoir.
The apparent trophic condition of both Reservoirs is greatly
influenced by the very short hydraulic retention time. With
such “flow-through” conditions, there is little or no accumula-
tion of nutrients, and Reservoir concentrations remain moderate
in spite of annual loadings of 50 lbs/acre/yr of phosphorus and
963 lbs/acre/yr of nitrogen.
-------
14
V. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Rhode Island National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tribu-
tary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high runoff
months of March and April when two samples were collected. Sampling was
begun in August, 1972, and was completed in July, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by the New
England District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary
sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were calculated
with mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows. Nutrient loadings
for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.)
were estimated by using the means of the nutrient loads, in lbs/mi 2 /year,
at stations C-i and D-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in mi 2 .
Discharges from the Zambarano Memorial Hospital wastewater treament
plant were sampled by personnel of the Rhode Island Department of Health
on a monthly basis, and flow data were provided.
In the following tables, the nutrient loads attributed to the Branch
River are those measured at station A-i minus the Zambarano Hospital loads.
-------
15
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop. Mean Receiving
Name Served Treatment Flow (mgd) Water
Zambarano 923 act, sludge 0.080 Clear River
Mem. Hospital
2. Industrial — Unknown
-------
16
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbs P/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Branch River 7,940 76.6
Trout Brook 100 1.0
Tarkiln Brook 410 4.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 170 1.6
d. Known municipal STP’s -
Zambarano Memorial Hospital 1,670 16.1
d. Septic tanks* - 40 0.4
e. Industrial - Unknown -
f. Direct precipitation** - 30 0.3
Total 10,360 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Branch River 8,630
3. Net annual P accumulation - 1,730 pounds
* Estimated population of 150 persons within 300 feet of Reservoirs at 0.25
lbs P and 9.4 lbs N/capita/yr.
** Estimated; see Working Paper No. 1.
-------
17.
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbsN/ %of
Source , yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load)
Branch River 166,160 83.3
Trout Brook 3,450 1.7
Tarkiln Brook 16,540 8.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 6,510 3.3
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Zambarano Memorial Hospital 3,330 1.7
d. Septic tanks* - 1,410 0.7
e. Industrial — Unknown
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,990 1.0
Total 199,390 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Branch River 195,940
3. Net annual N accumulation - 3,450 pounds
* Estimated population of 150 persons within 300 feet of Reservoirs at 0.25
lbs P and 9.4 lbs N/capita/yr.
** Estimated; see Working Paper No. 1
-------
18
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary lbs P/mi 2 /yr lbs N/mi 2 /yr
Branch River 108 2,255
Trout Brook 40 1 ,380
Tarkiln Brook 45 1,798
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his “dangerous” rate is the rate at which the
receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his
“permissible” rate is that which would result in the receiving
water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if mor-
phometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would be considered one
between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
lbs/acr /yr 50.0 8.4 963.2 16.7
grams/rn /yr 5.61 0.94 108.0 1.9
Vol1e weider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of the Slatersville
Reservoirs:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 2.40
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 1.20
-------
19
VI. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1970. Rhode Island lakes and ponds. RI Water Resources
Board, Providence.
Boghosian, Hagbop, 1973. Personal communication (Zambarano Memorial
Hospital waste treatment facilities). RI Divn. Water Supply &
Pollution Control, Providence.
Fester, James W., 1973. Personal comunication (physical character-
istics of Slatersville Reservoirs). RI Divn. Water Supply &
Pollution Control, Providence.
George, Raymond, 1973. Personal communication (existing and planned
Burrillville sewage systems). Burriliville Sewage Commission,
Burrillvil le.
Glass Kraft Co., 1973. Personal communication (uses and control of
reservoirs). Slatersville.
Hilleson, Upton, 1973. Personal communication (industrial discharges
in Burriliville twp.). The Andrew Worsted Co., Burriliville.
Hoernie, Frederic C., 1973. Personal communication (proposed Burrill-
yule sewage system). C. E. Maquire, Inc., Providence.
McCusker, John H., 1973. Personal communication (industrial discharges
in Burrillville). Jonell Corp., Burriliville.
Minutelli, Francis, 1973. Personal communication (Burriliville
sewage system; land use in Slatersville Reservoirs watershed).
Dept. of Public Works, Burriliville.
Newcombe, Kenneth, 1973. Personal communication (proposed Burrillville
sewage system; industrial discharges). C. E. Maquire, Inc.,
Providence.
Phillips, Charles L., 1973. Personal communication (physical, chemical
and biological characteristics of Slatersville Reservoirs). RI
Dept. of Natural Resources, Providence.
Russ, Robert B., 1973. Personal communication (physical and biological
characteristics of Upper Slatersville Reservoir). RI Water
Resources Board, Providence.
Vollenweider, Richard A., (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz
A. Hydrol.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
T Ir3 JTA Y FLOW 1NF09MATI0 ’4 F09 -IODE ISLAND
7,9,74
LA< CO)’ 4402
LATc SVILLF FSERVO1
TOTAL D A !IJA(,E A A Oi LAK(
P9• 74)
TOLAL D A1NA( APEA OF LAKE =
SuI’i OF SU8—f) AI NA(’E AI LAS =
TPIOLJTAQY MO ’\jr-l Y AP
MEAN FLOW fl4Y FLOw DA
FLOW DAY
FL 0W
17 214.00
21 1c4.o0
17 260.00
21 187.00
SlJ l..—OPA1 ’ A(,F
NORMALIZED
FLOWS
TPIPJTA-Y
AP’ A
J
F
MAP
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
441501
7 .7Q
If I. 0
l’” .00
2&’4.00
233.00
15 ’.0O
86.20
42.5’)
43.80
55.30
63.50
112.00
145.00
128.48
44 15A2
8Q.l ( .j
IQ .u
- ‘?1.OO
121.00
? i3.00
189.00
105.00
51.70
53.30
67.30
77.20
136.00
177.00
156.18
31
r lQ.?j
1Q6.JC)
273.00
121.00
241.00
189.00
105.00
51.70
53.30
67.30
77.20
136.00
177.00
156.18
44 15C1
‘• A
5.40
f .I0
4.4 )
7.440
5.20
2.90
1.40
1.50
1.80
2.10
3.70
4.80
4.28
463501
Q.I 5
20.00
‘7. O
32.90
2 4.90
19.30
10.70
5.30
5.40
6.90
7.90
13.90
18.00
15.95
441527
4.’.))
9.6)
11.80
1S. 0
13. 0
9.30
5.10
2.50
2.60
3.30
3.80
6.70
8.70
7.67
9 N 4ONT-ILY FLO- S AN)) I)AILY FLOwS
SUMMARY
89.70 TOTAL FLOW ZN =
1882.00
89.72 TOTAL FLOW OUT =
3759.00
4 435A 1
N
77
‘-5.10
30
40.50
9
7 ”
59.10
9
46.20
14
7-’
141.00
14
150.00
11
7?
3444.00
4
152.00
17
7 ’
4 -.00
759.00
I
7
? ‘ ?.8
5
349.00
7
71
311. u
3
1415.00
1
73
175.00
4
125.00
‘.
P1
I- ’.u0
7
324.00
5
74
189.00
N
199.00
5
73
9 .30
?
102.00
7
74
JOQ•’)0
1?
64.60
443S 0?
9
4
jO
11
1?
1
7
1
4
5
s
7
77
7’
7’
‘
7’
73
74
71
71
71
73
71
54.’d
4.1(I
11I.uO
45 .00
593.00
343.00
377.00
?l3.’jfl
379.00
9.08
112.00
I1’.LO
30
9
14
4
9
5
4
3
1
5
‘
1’
49.30
s S .?0
18J.OO
I ’ 5.O0
924.00
425.00
1122.00
1s2.0O
3 ’34.OO
243.00
125.00
7t1S i)
-------
TPP-iIJIAOY FLO INFO9MATIUN FOP Pr-1O1)E ISLAND 7/9/74
LA’(F COI1F 4402 SLATEP5 ILL 9ESFiVOIN
MFt N ‘IONT’-4LY FLOWS ANI) i)AILY FLOwS
rP19oTA Y 1ONTH YEAP MEAN FLOW •)AY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
q 7 ’ 4M•7Ø 30 49.30
9 7’ 4.10 9 cb.2o
IC 77 lfl.O0 14 l 3.OO
II 7? 466.00 4 185.00
1’ 7? 593.00 9 924.00
I 73 343.00 6 425.00
7 73 377. C 3 1722.00
1 73 ? 13.00 3 152.00 17 260.00
0 7 379.00 7 39 ..OO 21 1M7.OO
5 71 229.00 5 243.00
S 73 112.00 2 125.00
7 71 132.00 12 7d. ”)
4 63SF) H I.°0 10 1.40
7? ?.?0 9 1.50
10 7’ 4.70 14 5.00
II 72 I?.70 5.10
I’ 7 ? 16.10 9 2 .30
I 73 9.40 6 11.70
2 71 16.10 3 47.20
1 (1 5. 0 1 4.70 17 7.10
4 71 I0. O 7 10.M0 21 .10
S 7 s.1o S 6.7 )
6 73 3.10 ‘ 3.40
7 71 3.F’0 1? 2.20
4415’)I P (‘ 6.90 30 5.00
9 77 P.60 9 5.70
11 72 17.50 II 20.00
11 7’ 47.70 4 18.90
7’ 60.10 9 9 ..10
I 73 35.00 6 43.40
73 38.50 1 116.00
3 71 21.70 3 15.50 17 26.60
4 71 )M.10 7 40.20 ?1 19.10
4 73 3 .70 7 40.20
5 71 ‘3.40 5 24.80
F’ 71 11.40 2 12.70
7 73 13.60 1? M.O0
441577 7? 3.30
7? 4.10
10 7’ 8.40
I I 77 23.00
I? 7? 29.10
I 7 16.M0
73 IP. F 0
1 71 I0.S’)
6 71 I .6I)
5 7) 11.20
6
7 1 6.40
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET ‘ ETRIE AL DATE 74/07/02
441)201
41 Sbi 43.0 ull 3 I8.’
SL TE SVILLF , FSE 1O1
44,127 RHOOF ISLA l )
1 1FPALES ?1112 ”)2
3 0007 Ft-El I)FPT ’l
DATE
F P OH
TO
ri q DEPTH
OF
DAY FFET
7?/06/03 10 ‘30 0000
72/08/01 00 00 0000
00 00 0004
7?/I0/06 13 00 0000
13 00 0004
8.6
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
O(’ 610
0066 5
WATER
DO
TPAHSP
CNI)UCTVY
Pr
I
ALK
NO?P NO3
N 13.’J
PkO T01
PHOS-’j!S
TEMP
SECCHI
F1FLE)
CACO3
H—TOTAL
TOTAL
CINT
MG/L
INCHFS
MI(ROMHO
SU
MG/L
Mu,/L
‘A6/L
M(,/L P
M( /L P
60
80
80
108
100
5.90
6.10
6.1 (1
6.70
6.
10K
10K
10K
25
10K
0.100
0.240
0.2’30
0.820
0.320
O.OQO
0.120
0.100
0.730
U.O 0
0.0e f ’
0.05’)
0.061
0.033
O.O3
0.009
0.020
0.021
0.013
0.012
DATE
FROM
TO
7?/06/03
72/08/01
7?/10/06
10.1 8.0 “0
60
23.0
56
14.1
32217
C’-iL’ ’ - HYL
A
UC’/L
11.73
7 •
4’ 6J
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
TIME 0E TH
OF
D Y FEET
10 30 0000
00 00 0000
13 00 0000
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STORET ETP1EVAL DATE 74/01/02
4L.02()?
41 59 21.0 C71 35 50 .iJ
SLATE’ SVILLE ES RVOii
44 iO ISLAND
211 )?02
0010 FEET DEPT-
DATE
F P0
TO
72/06/0 ’.
7?/0 (/0 I
72/10/06
TIME oE rH
OF
(JAY FEET
10 50 0000
00 00 0000
1? 30 0000
12217
C I PPHYL
A
I I i IL
4 •
1’).9J
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPT’-I
OF
DAY FEET
.1 ftPALFS
1
72/06/04 10 50 0000
7?/08/01 00 00 0000
00 00 0004
72/10/06 12 30 0000
12 30 0004
1? 30 0010
19.1
16.1
14.6
00011
00300
J0 77
00094
00400
00410
00610
00610
006f 5
006 1 ,6
AT R
‘)O
TQAIs’ P
CNDUCTVY
P’-4
T
ALK
NO7 NO3
NH3—N
°-40S—TOT
-‘OS—I)1S
TEMP
SLCCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
W’/L
I ”iCHFS
? lICPOMI-4O
SU
Mb/L
MG/L
M6/L
M1 3 /L P
M /L P
4Q
( ‘ Is
54
I4 Ø
10.5
10.2
60 5.9J
( ‘S 6.1)
65 6.10
91 7.10
91
6.45
10 K
10K
I O K
1 0’(
1 0’(
1 OK
0.110
o • I 0
0 • 1 O
0 •
0 • iJ50
0 • 060
o • 120
0.150
0.120
0 .0 0
0.070
(1.0 MO
0.01$-
0.0 14
0 • 046
0.034
().0? 1
0.011
0 .OO
0.01 ’ )
0.) 25
0.012
O • 110’)
0 • 009
K* VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
J ’ VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STD ET ETRjEvAL r)AIF 74/07/02
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FFET
3 21 7
CI-4L °HYL
A
UG/L
440203
41 59 47.0 ‘)71 34 59.’
SLATEPS ’/!LLE ESE V )1’
44 4r101)E ISLA”JI)
1 IEPALES
3
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF•
DAY FEET
7?/06/04 11 15 0000
11 15 0015
7?/08/01 17 ?5 0000
17 25 0004
17 ?5 0009
72/10/06 11 50 0000
11 50 0004
Ii so 0010
2111202
ooic FEET 1)E.’T0
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
O0 ”4 5
00666
WATER
D C )
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
i’H
I
ALK
NO7 N03
NH3-N
Pr-lOS—TOT
Pi-IOS—OIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIFLI)
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
C NT
MG/L
INCHES
MICPOM’-U)
SO
M&/L
MG/L
MG/L
tc3/L P
M(,/L P
20.0
17.6
?4 • P
27• o
16.2
16.0
‘4.4
7.2
7.4
60
70 5 .P)
70 6.30
70 6.20
75
93 6.6 ’)
91 6.5 ( 1
91 6.45
IOr(
10
10K
1 3 1 <
10K
101<
1 01<
101<
O . OHO
0 .090
0.210
0.200
0 • 190
0. OR 0
0 • 130
o • 120
0 • 040
0.090
O • 140
0 • 130
0 • 240
0 • 000
0.?10
0.230
0.0?”
0.024
0 • 0 4r)
0 • 040
0 • 051
O • 036
0 • (132
0.029
72/06/04
11
15
0000
7 .3J
7?/ORIO I
17
25
0000
4. IJ
72/10/06
11
50
0000
14.6J
0.014
0.070
0.0 17
0.0 19
0.023
0.014
0.010
i l • 009
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4 ’O2’ 1
41 58 30.0 071 37 00.0
BRANCH RIVER
44 7.5 GEORGIAVILLE
I/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
OLD ST HWY 42 BRDG BELO GLENDALE STP
I1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00630 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
77/OR/2f, 11 15 0.235 0.600 0.010 0.014 0.074
72/09/09 OR 40 0.445 0.400 0.138 0.019 0.056
7?/10/14 10 40 0.190 0.550 0.096 0.008 0.028
72/11/04 09 40 0.169 0.400 0.092 0.011 0.029
7?/12/09 09 15 0.147 1.300 0.050 0.005K 0.021
73/01/06 10 20 0.210 0.270 0.034 0.006 0.010
73/02/03 09 45 0.132 0.600 0.056 0.022 0.060
73/03/03 0.336 0.280 0.039 0.008 0.025
73/03/17 10 15 0.350 0.210 0.044 0.006 0.020
71/04/07 11 45 0.132 0.180 0.027 0.005K 0.010
73/04/?1 13 00 0.190 0.305 0.015 0.008 0.020
71/05/05 0.160 0.400 0.042 0.010 0.020
71/06/0? 09 30 0.038 0.230 0.030 0.007 0.130
73/07/12 10 25 0.294 0.640 0.064 0.015 0.035
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
44 )2
42 00 00.0 071 35 00.0
BRANCH RIVER
44 7.5 GEORGIAVILLE
O/SLATERSVILLE PESERVOIR
ST HWY S BROG E EDGE OF SLATERSVILLE
1 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2F NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FFET MG/L ‘iG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
7 /0R/26 10 10 0.163 0.800 0.021 0.006 0.030
7?/09/09 0.147 0.750 0.121 0.009 0.040
7?/10/14 10 10 0.169 0.500 0.126 0.009 0.034
7?/l1/04 10 35 0.218 0.300 0.095 0.008 0.035
7?/17/0 1? 30 0.120 0.320 0.036 0.005K 0.035
73/01/06 10 00 0.176 0.110 0.032 0.005K 0.015
73/02/03 10 30 0.176 0.520 0.039 0.013 0.045
73/03/03 10 10 0.252 0.350 0.021 0.005K 0.020
71/03/17 09 15 0.240 0.310 0.011 0.005K 0.015
73/04/07 ii 15 0.126 1.680 0.044 0.00 5K 0.015
73/04/21 09 50 0.120 0.370 0.030 0.005K 0.015
73/06/02 10 00 0.100 0.400 0.033 0.007 0.039
73/07/12 08 30 0.084 0.600 0.044 0.006 0.020
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402A3
‘+1 58 30.0 071 38 00.0
BRANCH RIVER
44 7.5 CHEPACHET
O/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
VICTORY HWY BRDG ABOV GLENDALE STP
11EPALFS 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PPIOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L 4G/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
72/08/26 11 25 0.300 0.900 0.022 0.015 0.066
7?/09/0Y OR 45 0.558 0.450 0.153 0.008 0.037
7 2/ 10/i ’. 11 00 0.200 0.450 0.105 0.OOg 0.030
7?/11/04 10 00 0.200 0.300 0.088 0.009 0.029
7?/1?/09 09 40 0.147 0.420 0.035 0.007 0.018
73/01/06 10 15 0.220 0.300 0.039 0.006 0.015
73/02/03 13 45 0.105 0.440 0.044 0.011 0.030
73/03/03 0.357 0.320 0.050 0.005K 0.020
73/03/17 10 30 0.360 0.260 0.031 0.007 0.020
73/04/07 12 05 0.160 0.160 0.017 0.005K 0.015
7 /04/21 0.198 0.780 0.050 0.006 0.020
73/05/05 0.150 0.460 0.063 0.008 0.020
73/06/02 10 30 0.220 0.880 0.081 0.008 0.030
73/07/12 10 10 0.310 0.680 0.094 0.019 0.040
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 14/07/02
4402B1
41 00 00.0 071 35 00.0
BRA”ICH RIVER
44 7.5 GEO GIAVILLE
0/SLATEPS RESERVOIR
ST HWY 5 BRDG E EDGE OF SLATERSVILLE
1 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00( 30 00625 00610 00671 00665
OATE TIMF DEPTrI NO? NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-M PHO5DTS PHOSTOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O THO
TO DAY FEET MG/I MG/I MG/L P4c /L P MG/L P
77/0 /2h 10 40 0.icq 0.425 0.018 0.00S ’( 0.031
7?/0 /09 08 35 0.152 0.600 0.129 0.005K 0.038
72/10/14 10 20 0.160 0.550 0.138 0.010 0.036
7?/I1/04 10 45 0.221 0.300 0.088 0.008 0.039
7?/ 12/OQ 1? 30 0.189 0.380 0.039 0.009 0.022
71/01/06 10 00 0.220 0.?20 0.034 0.006 0.015
73/02/03 10 15 0.250 0.520 0.040 0.011 0.040
71/03/03 10 15 0.273 0.230 0.030 0.00 5K 0.020
71/03/17 09 15 0.290 0.270 0.046 0.006 0.020
73/04/07 11 ?0 0.126 0.170 0.005K 0.005K 0.015
73/04/21 09 45 0.132 0.330 0.017 0.005K 0.015
73/05/05 09 30 0.130 0.640 0.046 0.006 0.025
71/06/02 10 00 0.110 0.460 0.026 0.007 0.044
73/07/12 08 25 0.084 0.470 ( .039 0.00 5K 0.020
-------
STOPET ETR1EVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402C1
41 59 30.0 071 35 00.0
TROUT BROOK
44 7.5 GEORGIAVILLE
T/SLATEPSVILLF RESERVOIR
TIFFT RD BRDG S OF SLATERSVILLE
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 0067) 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO7F .NO1 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM O N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L M(,/L MC’/L P MG/L P
7?/0S/?6 10 55 0.048 0.350 0.01? 0.005K 0.011
7?/0 /09 08 50 0.028 0.300 0.107 0.005K 0.012
7?/I0/14 10 40 0.045 0.350 0.096 0.005K 0.014
7?/I )/04 10 20 0.018 0.150 0.060 0.005K 0.011
7?/l?/OQ 10 00 0.126 0.460 0.035 0.005K 0.011
71/01/06 10 15 0.170 0.460 0.052 0.005K 0.005K
73/02/03 11 15 0.126 0.440 0.064 0.010 0.065
71/03/03 10 30 0.176 0.180 0.036 0.005K 0.0051<
71/01/17 09 30 0.096 0.170 0.018 0.005K 0.010
73/04/07 10 55 0.115 0.210 0.026 0.005K 0.010
71/04/21 10 00 0.075 0.320 0.027 0.005K 0.010
71/05/05 10 15 0.048 1.540 0.087 0.006 0.015
73/06/0? 09 00 0.020 0.?90 0.02? 0.005K 0.025K
71/07/1? 08 20 0.026 0.520 0.063 0.00 5 1 < 0.015
-------
STORET PETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402D1
41 58 00.0 07) 36 00.0
TARKILN BRODK
44 7.5 GEORGIAVILLE
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
DOUGLAS PIKE BROG SE OF NASONVILLE
1 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTM NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N HOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L HG/I MG/L P P4G/L P
72/08/26 12 05 0.042 0.950 0.033 0.005K 0.015
77/o /0g 08 30 0.036 0.350 0.0R4 0.005K 0.016
7’/I0/13 10 20 0.067 0.450 0.097 0.005K 0.016
7?/11/04 09 20 0.047 0.300 0.053 0.005K 0.015
7 /I /O9 0 50 0.054 0.240 0.012 0.005K 0.008
73/01/06 09 30 0.095 0.180 0.019 0.005K 0.005K
73/02/03 09 00 0.093 0.400 0.017 0.008 0.020
73/03/03 09 00 0.089 1.420 0.120 0.005K 0.010
73/03/17 13 30 0.046 0.290 0.024 0.005K 0.010
71/04/07 1) 50 0.0?9 0.220 0.008 0.005K 0.010
71/04/21 13 15 0.026 0.270 0.015 0.005K 0.010
7 1/05/05 0.035 0.810 0.069 0.006 0.015
73/06/0? 11 00 0.010K 0.370 0.019 0.005K 0.015
71/07/12 10 30 0.039 0.390 0.048 0.005K 0.015
-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402E1
41 57 00.0 071 38 30.0
CHEPACHET RIVER
44 7.5 CHEPACI-$ET
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
COOPER RD BRDG E OF MAPLEVILLE
1IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL N13-N PHOSDIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L p
7?/0R/26 11 50 0.174 0.650 0.022 0.005K 0.018
7?/0’ /09 08 50 0.137 0.300 0.088 0.005K 0.014
72/10/13 11 15 0.078 0.300 0.074 0.005K 0.014
72/11/04 10 20 0.117 0.400 0.072 0.010 0.021
72/12/09 10 40 0.090 0.330 0.024 0.005K 0.010
73/01/06 11 15 0.132 0.290 0.026 0.005K 0.005K
73/02/03 14 05 0.069 0.460 0.021 0.008 0.015
73/01/03 0.168 0.290 0.035 0.005K 0.015
73/03/17 10 50 0.120 0. 780 0.030 0.005K 0.015
71/04/07 14 00 0.052 0.370 0.010 0.005K 0.010
73/04/21 11 30 0.092 0.260 0.018 0.005K 0.010
73/05/05 0.075 0.300 0.032 0.007 0.020
71/06/0? 11 15 0.010K 0.270 0.010 0.005K 0.015
73/07/12 10 00 0.138 0.180 0.04€ ’ 0.005K 0.025
-------
STORET PETRrEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402F1
41 57 30.0 071 39 00.0
CLEAR RIVER
44 7.5 CHEPACHET
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
ST HWY 102 BROG BELO HARRISVILLE STP
1IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N Pi -IOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF ‘J-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P t 4G/L P
7?/08/26 0.240 0.700 0.115 0.010 0.058
7?/09/09 09 00 0.296 0.400 0.164 0.006 0.046
7?/IO/.13 11 25 0.100 0.350 0.084 0.007 0.031
7?/11/04 10 40 0.1?6 0.3?5 0.073 0.008 0.032
73/01/06 10 47 0.176 0.440 0.043 0.006 0.015
71/02/01 13 55 0.100 0.480 0.042 0.010 0.030
71/03/03 0.260 0.4?0 0.052 0.009 0.020
71/03/17 10 40 0.168 0.220 0.023 0.005K 0.020
71/04/07 13 30 0.088 1.760 0.058 0.00 5K 0.015
73/04/21 14 00 0.100 0.310 0.025 0.005K 0.020
73/05/05 0.084 1.100 0.120 0.0)0 0.020
73/06/02 10 00 0.180 0.520 0.052 0.006 0.030
73/07/1? 10 15 0.180 0.460 0.058 0.007 0.035
-------
ST RET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402F2
41 58 30.0 071 40 30.0
CLEAI RIVER
44 7.5 CHEPACHET
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
St HWY 98 B DG AOOV HARRISVILLF SIP
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTilO
TO DAY FEET MG/L 4G/L HG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/08/26 11 35 0.230 0.550 0.023 0.028 0.048
72/09/09 08 45 0.330 0.450 0.150 0.013 0.063
72/10/14 09 45 0.071 0.400 0.061 0.009 0.027
72/11/04 09 26 0.078 0.300 0.073 0.008 0.024
71/01/06 09 30 0.160 0.250 0.024 0.007 0.012
73/0’/03 09 55 0.065 0.385 0.016 0.008 0.015
71/03/03 10 00 0.168 0.190 0.014 0.009 0.009
71/01/17 11 10 0.126 0.240 0.010 O.005 < 0.00 5K
73/04/11 13 00 0.0b2 0.155 0.010 0.009 0.015
71/04/21 10 15 0.074 0.250 0.015 0.005K 0.020
71/05/05 09 45 0.056 0.250 0.028 0.008 0.020
73/06/02 09 40 0.098 0.370 0.048 0.008 0.035
71/07/1? 08 50 0.176 0.440 0.075 0.015 0.035
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/02
4402F3
41 58 00.0 071 43 30.0
CLEAR RIVER
44 7.5 CHEPACHET
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
I MI NW OF PASCOAG BELO WALLUM LK ST SIP
1IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO &N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N P1-405-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM o N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO D Y FF ET MG/L 4G/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/08/26 14 10 0.022 0.700 0.023 0.009 0e030
7?/09/09 09 05 0.0 17 0.300 0.024 0.005K 0.020
7?/10/14 10 30 0.040 0.350 0.056 0.007 0.030
72/11/04 10 45 0.023 0.250 0.044 0.006 0.023
7’/1?/09 10 45 0.056 0.350 0.015 0.015 0.019
71/01/06 10 45 0.060 O. IQO 0.018 0.010 0.020
71/02/01 10 45 0.1?0 0.400 0.023 0.008 0.015
73/03/03 11 00 0.069 0.230 0.025 0.00 5K 0.015
73/03/17 11 50 0.O1OP< 0.180 0.021 0.005K 0.010
71/04/11 ii 30 0.010K 0.230 0.005K 0.007 0.015
71/04/21 10 45 0.010K 0.215 0.012 0.005K 0.015
73/05/05 10 45 0.010K 0.420 0.045 0.005 0.017
71/06/0? 11 10 0.010K 0.540 0.033 0.006 0.015
71/07/12 0 05 0.020 0.440 0.026 0.005K 0.0 15
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/07/0?
4402F4
42 00 00.0 071 45 30.0
CLEAR R1VE
44 7.5 OXFORD
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
BRDG NE OF WALLUM LK ABOV SANITARIUM STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO? .NO3 TOT t JEL NH3—N PNOS01S PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MC /L P MG/L P
7?/08/?6 14 45 0.019 0.400 0.020 0.005K 0.005K
72/09/09 09 15 0.045 0.150 0.039 0.005K 0.005K
77/Ifl/14 10 40 0.065 0.200 0.075 0.005K 0.005K
72/11/04 11 00 0.060 0.150 0.04P 0.005K 0.005K
7?/1?/09 11 15 0.147 0.350 0.014 0.005K 0.006
71/01/06 11 15 0.036 0.170 0.014 0.005K 0.005K
73/02/03 11 00 0.048 0.360 0.010 0.005K 0.005
73/03/03 11 20 0.032 0.150 0.030 0.005K 0.005K
73/03/17 13 00 0.025 0.240 0.013 0.005K
73/04/11 13 40 0.015 0.1 0 0.005K 0.005K 0.005
71/04/21 11 00 0.020 0.200 0.019 0.005K 0.00 5K
73/05/05 11 10 0.027 0.230 0.034 0.005K 0.005K
73/06/0? 10 50 0.017 4.600 0.315 0.005K 0.015
71/07/12 09 20 0.0 13 0.130 0.01? 0.005K 0.005K
-------
ST’)RET ETR!EV4L DATE 74/07/02
4402(1
41 58 00.0 071 62 00.0
PASCOAG RIVER
44 7.5 CHE:PACHET
T/SLATERSVILLE RESERVOIR
BRDG BETWEEN PASCOAG AND F3RIDGETON
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
ROP-1 OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET • MG/L 4G/L MG/L P4G/L P MG/L P
72/08/? ’ 0.104 1.200 0.075 0.160 0.340
72/09/09 08 55 0.137 0.600 0.178 0.031 0.105
7?/10/14 10 00 0.100 0.250 0.110 0.034 0.072
77/11/04 09 5 0.041 0.300 0.048 0.022 0.065
7?/12/0Q 10 05 0.100 0.540 0.022 0.013 0.028
73/0I/0 10 00 0.176 0.580 0.050 0.02) 0.060
71/02/03 10 05 0.160 0.650 0.04? 0.013 0.040
73/03/03 10 30 0.092 0.630 0.058 0.022 0.070
73/03/17 11 30 0.220 1.360 0.130 0.058 0.230
71/04/U 13 15 0.024 0.260 0.015 o.ooe 0.015
71/04/21 10 30 0.097 0.810 0.042 0.032 0.140
73/05/05 10 15 0.027 0.360 0.046 0.014 0.035
73/06/0? 10 10 0.036 0.670 0.115 0.016 0.020
73/07/12 09 00 0.105 0.540 0.200 0.028 0.060
-------
ST0: ET PErPIEvAL DATE 74/07/0?
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02 N03
FROM 0F
00625 00610
TOT KJEL NH3-N
440250 POOOO 3
41 58 30.0 071 4S 00.0
ALLUM LAKE SI. SAN.
44 1.5 CHEPACHET
T/SLATFRSVILLE QES
CLEAR RIVER
1HPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00665 50051 50053
PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
00671
PHOS-DIS
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
OPTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/I
MG/L
MG/I
Hr /L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
72/10/04
07
15
CP(T)—
3.100
7.700
1.890
5.600
10.400
0.100
0.100
7?/10/04
14
45
72/11/09
07
45
CP(T)—
0.410
30.000
2.100
1.850
7.600
0.080
0.070
72/11/09
15
15
72/12/06
07
15
CP(T)—
4.500
17.800
2.100
5.600
0.090
0.090
7?/1?/06
14
45
73/01/04
07
15
CP(T)—
5.760
10.500
0.810
2.520
7.700
0.080
0.070
73/01/04
14
45
73/02/07
07
15
CP(T)—
1.370
15.400
6.600
3.600
4.900
0.080
0.080
73/02/07
15
00
73/03/14
07
30
CP(T)—
2.000
5.300
0.670
5.000
5.500
0.060
0.070
71/03/14
15
00
73/04/1?
07
00
CD(T) _
3.125
3.400
0.525
5.700
6.300
0.080
0.080
73/04/1?
15
00
71/05/09
08
00
CP(T)—
4.300
5.800
0.820
6.000
6.900
0.060
0.075
73/05/09
15
00
73/06/06
07
00
CP(T)—
5.900
?.50 0
0.440
6.600
7.000
0.080
0.080
73/06/06
15
00
73/07/1?
07
00
CP(T)—
3.360
2.200
0.210
4.300
5.500
0.080
0.080
73/07/1?
15
00
------- |