U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE mXINKLJCKE
MARSHALL COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 535
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVAD
-------
REPORT
ON
LAIC MAXINKUCKEE
MARSHALL COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 335
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
AND THE
INDIANA NATIONAL GUARD
APRIL, 1976
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Indiana Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions i
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Sumary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. AppendiceS 14
-------
•11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning { 3O3(e)}, water
quality criteria/standards review { 3O3(c)}, clean lakes { 3l4(a,b)},
and water quality monitoring [ 1O6 and §305(b)} activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
AC KNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Indiana State Board of
Health for professional involvement, to the Indiana National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Indiana wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Pollution Control, Indiana
State Board of Health, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Alfred F. Ahner, Adjutant General of Indiana,
and Project Officers Lt. Colonel Charles B. Roberts (Retired)
and Colonel Robert L. Sharp, who directed the volunteer efforts
of the Indiana National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF INDIANA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Bass Starke
Cataract Owen 1 Putnam
Crooked Steuben
Dallas LaGrange
Geist Hamilton, Marion
Hamilton Steuben
Hovey Posey
James Kosciusko
James Steuben
Long Steuben
Marsh Steuben
Mississinewa Grant, Miami, Wabash
Maxinkuckee Marshall
Monroe Brown, Monroe
Morse Hamilton
Olin LaGrange
Oliver LaGrange
Pigeon Steuben
Sylvan Noble
Tippecanoe Kosciusko
Versailles Ripley
Wawassee Kosciusko
Webster Kosciusko
Westler LaGrange
Whitewater Union
Winona Kosciusko
Witmer LaGrange
-------
V
\
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
0 Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Drainage Area Boundary
Map Location
-------
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
STORET NO. 1843
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Lake Maxinkuckee Is mesotrophic.
It ranked fifth in overall trophic quality when the 27 Indiana
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six
parameters*. Six of the lakes had less median total phosphorus,
none of the others had less but two had the same median dissolved
phosphorus, five had less median inorganic nitrogen, four had less
mean chlorophyll a, and four had greater mean Secchi disc trans-
parency. Depletion of hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen occurred at
station 1 in August.
Survey lithnologists reported submerged macrophytes at station
2 in August and October and sparse growths at station 1 in October.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate phosphorus limitation at the
time the sample was collected (05/02/73). The lake data indicate
phosphorus limitation in August as well but probable nitrogen limi-
tation in October.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--No known municipal or industrial point
sources impacted Lake Maxinkuckee during the sampling year. Lake-
shore septic tanks were estimated to have contributed 3.5% of the
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
total phosphorus load but a shoreline survey would be necessary
to determine the significance of those sources.
The relatively small septic tank load Is In agreement with an
earlier evaluation of the impact of septic tanks on the lake
prior to Indiana’s phosphate detergent ban (Hamelink, 1971). How-
ever, these sources are potentially dangerous considering the num-
ber of people that could inhabit the existing shoreline dwellings.
Hamel ink (op. cit.) estimated that about 20% of the dwellings were
occupied by full-time residents. Although the threat posed by
expected growth was considered minimal by Hamelink, the associated
activities (i.e., boating, fishing, fertilizing of lawns on the
lakeshore, etc.) would be expected to greatly increase the phosphorus
loading to the lake.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.15 g/m 2 /yr is less than
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as
a eutrophic loading but is more than his oligotrophic loading;
i.e., a mesotrophic loading (see page 12). However, all phosphorus
inputs to the lake should be minimized to the greatest practicable
degree since only a 30% increase in the existing loading would
result in a eutrophic loading.
2. Non-point sources--The three gaged tributaries accounted
for about 56% of the total phosphorus load reaching the lake
during the sampling year. Unnamed Creek B-l contributed 26.8%;
Curtiss Ditch, 20.8%; and Wilson Ditch contributed 8.7% of the
total load.
-------
3
The ungaged ininediate drainage area was estimated to have
contributed 29.0%. The phosphorus load from this source may even
be more significant because of the use of fertilizers on lake-
shore lawns (Hamelink, op. cit.).
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryt :
1. Surface area: 7.54 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 7.3 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 26.8 meters.
4. Volume: 55.042 x 106 3
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 6.7 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km 2 )* ( m 3 /sec)*
Wilson Ditch 5.7 0.05
Unnamed Creek B-i 6.5 0.06
Curtiss Ditch 6.2 0.06
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 9.6 0.09
Totals 28.0 0.26
2. Outlet -
Wilson Ditch 355** O.26**
C. Precipitation* :
1. Year of sampling: 104.3 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 92.6 centimeters.
i Table of metric conversions--Appendix B.
ti- Winters, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods,
1973-1976”.
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Maxinkuckee was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from a number of depths at two stations on the lake (see map, page
v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom
to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton
identification and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single
18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was coinposited for algal assays.
Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of
the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum depths sampled
were 12.2 meters at station 1 and 12.8 meters at station 2.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
sumarized in the following table.
-------
2 SITES
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
STORET CODE 1843
1ST SAMPLING ( 5/ 2/73) 2ND SAMPLING ( 8/ 3/73)
2 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10/13/73)
2 SITES
PARAMETER
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
TEMP (C)
13.9
— 14.0
13.9
13.9
15.0
— 24.7
22,4
23.3
19.5
— 20.1
19.8
‘19.8
DISS OXY (MG/L)
9.5
— 9.7
9.6
9.7
0.0
— 9.0
5.9
7.9
7.6
— 8.2
7,9
7.9
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
400.
— 400.
400.
400.
326.
— 360.
348.
354.
322.
— 327.
324.
324.
PH (STAND UNITS)
8.3
— 8.3
8.3
8.3
7.5
— 8.5
8.2
8.4
8.3
— 8.5
8.4
8.4
TOT ALIç (MG/I)
154.
— 157.
156.
156.
140.
— 166.
145.
141.
132.
— 136.
134.
135.
TOT,P (MG/L)
0.020
— 0.033
0.024
0.022
0.012
— 0.018
0.014
0.014
0.017
— 0.038
0.025
0.023
ORTHO P (MG/I)
0.002
— 0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
— 0.004
0.004
0.004
0.008
— 0.014
0.010
0.009
N02.N03 (HG/L)
0.210
— 0.230
0.220
0.220
0.050
— 0.080
0.064
0.060
0.030
—0.050
0.040
0.040
AMMONIA (HG/I)
0.070
— 0.080
0.074
0.070
0.060
— 0.470
0.133
0.060
0.050
— 0.100
0.072
0.070
KJEI N (MG/I)
0.400
— 0.700
0.537
0.550
0.300
— 0.700
0.443
0.400
0.800
— 1.000
0.900
0.900
INORG N (MG/I)
0.280
— 0.310
0.294
0.290
0.110
— 0.530
0.197
0.120
0.090
— 0.1 0
0.112
0.110
TOTAL N (MG/L)
0.620
— 0.920
0.757
0.770
0.350
— 0.760
0.507
0.480
0.830
— 1.050
0.940
0.940
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
4.7
— 5.3
5.0
5.0
5.7
— 5.8
5.1
5.7
5.5
— 5.9
5.7
SECCI$1 (METERS) 2.7 — 3.4 3.0 3.0
2.1 — 2.3 2.2 2.2
2.1 — 2.1 2.1 2.1
-------
7
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
05/02/73 1. Fra ilaria p .. 510
2. Cyclotella . 243
3. Green filaments 146
4. Flagellates 73
5. Melosira 49
Other genera 217
Total 1,238
08/03/73 1. Flagellates 340
2. Melosira p.. 120
3. Stephanodiscus . _p. 120
4. Gomphosphaeria p. 100
5. Synedra a• 80
Other genera 295
Total 1,055
10/13/73 1. Lyngbya p. 3,471
2. Fragilaria . 131
3. Goniphosphaeria p. 109
4. Flage1lat s 109
5. Microcystis p. 87
Other genera 132
Total 4,039
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( .ig/1 )
05/02/73 1 5.3
2 4.7
08/03/73 1 5.8
2 5.7
10/13/73 1 5.5
2 5.9
-------
8
Maximum yield
( muJ1 4!y wt. )
0.1
6.3
12.7
0.1
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N
Sj ike (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i ) ____ ______
Control 0.010 0.259
0.050 P 0.060 0.259
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.060 1.259
1.0 N 0.010 1.259
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Lake Maxinkuckee was low at the time the sample was col-
lected (05/02/73). There was a significant increase in yield
when orthophosphorus was increased, but there was no change in
yield when only nitrogen was added. These results indicate
phosphorus limitation.
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in August
as well (the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratio
was 49/1). However, the data indicate probable nitrogen limi-
tation in October (the mean N/P ratio was 11/1).
-------
9
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Indiana National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites Indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in June, 1973, and was completed in May, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the Indiana District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*.
Nutrient loads for unsampled “minor tributaries and inii ediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S .) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads at stations A-2, B-l, and C-i, in kg/km 2 /year , and
multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
Note that the estimated phosphorus load from septic tanks was
reduced by 50% to adjust for the phosphate detergent ban in effect
in Indiana since January, 1972.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Wilson Ditch 100 8.7
Unnamed Creek B-i 310 26.8
Curtiss Ditch 240 20.8
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 335 29.0
c. Known municipal SIP’s - None -
d. Septic tanks* - 40 3.5
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Direct precipitation** - 130 11.2
Total 1,155 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet - Wilson Ditch 195
3. Net annual P accumulation - 960 kg.
* Estimate based on 260 shoreline dwellings (20% full-time residences);
see Working Paper No, 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Wilson Ditch 6,010 14.6
Unnamed Creek B-l 9,415 22.8
Curtiss Ditch 5,005 12.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 10,590 25.4
c. Known municipal STP’s — None -
d. Septic tanks* - 3,105 5.3
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Direct precipitation** - 8,140 19.8
Total 42,265 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Wilson Ditch 8,650
3. Net annual N accumulation - 33,615 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
Wilson Ditch 18 1,054
Unnamed Creek B-i 48 1 ,448
Curtiss Ditch 39 807
* Estimate based on 260 shoreline dwellings (20% full-time residences);
see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his ‘dangerous” loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his “permissible” loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A nieso-
trophic loading would be considered one between “dangerous”
and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrqgen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 0.15 0.13 5.6 4.5
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Maxinkuckee:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic loading) 0.20
“Permissible” (oligotrophic loading) 0.10
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Hamelink, Jerry L., 1971. Limnology of Lake Maxinkuckee. MS, Dept.
of Forestry & Cons., Purdue U., West Lafayette.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Winters, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
IN Div. of Water Poll. Contr., Indianapolis.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO bE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDl ’ .N MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15- MEIJIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INOP(, N MEAN SEC CP4LO . A MIN 00 DISS O T-iO P
1805 CA1A. ACT LAKE 0.05 1.660 ‘.66.667 10.744 15.000 0.013
1811 GEIST RESE. VOIR 0.07’. 1.080 472.500 45.950 11.600 0.009
16 17 JAMES LAKE 0.024 1.030 434.000 11.533 15.000 0.008
1827 MISSISSINEWA PESEPVOIP 0.107 2.400 473.444 15.778 15.000 0.U2
1828 MONMOE RE3EkVO1 0.02 0.325 438.b23 6.947 15.000 0.00,
1829 MORSE RESERVOIM 0.084 3.325 473.222 56.167 15.000 0.009
1838 WAWASEE LAKE 0.012 0.210 364.500 5.000 14.600 0.003
1837 WEBSTER LAKE 0.025 0.190 431.000 11.500 15.000 0.005
1839 WNITEWATE. LAKE 0.084 1.620 470.16? 33.083 1 5.000 0.012
1840 WINONA LAKE 0.035 1.250 444.667 11.211 15.000 0.011
1841 WESILEP LAKE 0.035 0.860 427.125 10.712 15.000 0.013
1842 WITHER LAKE 0.035 0.900 440.333 11.917 15.000 0.011
1843 LAKE MA 1NKUCKEE 0.020 0.220 400.400 5.483 15.000 0.003
1844 TIPPECANOE LAKE 0.019 0.195 391.500 6.050 15.000 0.005
1845 DALLAS LAKE 0.029 0.830 413.333 10.067 15.000 0.014
1846 OLIN LAKE 0.012 1.460 403.333 4.867 14.900 0.003
1847 OLIVER LAKE 0.009 0.920 392.000 3.767 14.800 0.004
1848 SYLVAN LAKE 0.170 0.130 489.833 47.480 14.800 0.011
1849 HOVEY LAKE 0.062 1.050 489.333 84. 67 1.600 0.024
1850 VERSAILLES LAKE. 0.139 1.090 482.000 25.018 14.500 0.019
1851 BASS LAKE 0.040 0.250 471.375 29.367 7.000 0.012
1852 CROOKEO LAKE 0.019 0.120 410.111 5.578 15.000 0.005
1853 LAKI JAMES 0.016 0.190 352.444 4.856 15.000 0.005
185’. LONG LAKE 0.20’. 1.920 442.667 16.100 15.000 0.150
lASS PIGEON LAKE 0.058 1.945 4’.2.b61 11.900 15.000 0.015
1856 MAPSN LAKE 0.093 0.270 451.333 34.467 15.000 0.055
1857 HAMILTON LAKE 0.033 0.120 413.167 17.450 15.000 0.016
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES wITi MIGNER VALUES (NUMBEk OF LAKES U ITI1 H1Gi1E VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
INO Li
N
O0—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CILOPA
NIH
00
DISS ORTHO P
NO
11305
CA1AI ACT LAKE
37 I
9)
15 I
4)
ru I
8)
62
16)
35 I
0)
31
9)
17
1811
8 (151 PESERVOIP4
27 I
7)
35 4
9)
IS
4)
12
3)
92 4
24)
62
C 16)
243
1817
JAMES LAKE
73 (
19)
42 4
11
8 I
IS)
50
I))
35 4
0)
65
C 17)
323
1827
P4ISS1SSINE A RESE 3VOIP
12
3)
4 I
1)
8
2)
38 I
10)
35 I
0)
8
C 2)
105
1828
MONROE RESERVO1 3
67 I
17)
b9 4
18)
54 4
14)
73 I
19)
35 4
0)
69
I 19)
367
1829
MORSE RESERVOIR
23
ol
0
0)
12 4
3
4 4
1)
35 4
0)
58
I 15)
132
1836
WAWASEE LAKE
94 I
24)
85 4
22)
96 C 25)
B8 I
23)
85 C
22)
98
1 25)
‘.6
1837
WE8STEP LAKE
67 C
17)
62 I
16)
62 I 16)
54 I
14)
35 I
0)
81
I 21)
361
1839
WHITEwATEW LAKE
19 4
5)
19 C
5)
23 1 6)
19 C
5)
35 C 0)
42
C 11)
157
1840
WINONA LAKE
50 I
12)
27 C
7)
38 4 10)
58 C
IS)
35 C 0)
52
C 13)
260
184)
WESTLEP LAKE
SO C
12)
54 C
14)
65 1 17)
65 C
17)
35 C 0)
37
4 9)
306
1842
WITMER LAKE
50 C
12)
50
13)
50 1 13)
42 I
11)
35 I 0)
52
I 13)
279
4843
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
77 C
20)
81 C
21)
85 ( 22)
85 C
22)
35 I 0)
98
25)
461
1844
TIPPECANOE LAKE
85 C
22)
88
23)
92 C 24)
77 (
20)
35 C 0)
85
1 22)
462
1865
DALLAS LAKE
62 I
16)
58 I
15)
69 I 18)
69
18)
35 1 0)
31
C 8)
324
1846
OLIN LAKE
94 4
24)
23 C
6)
81 C 21)
92 C
24)
73 C 19)
92
C 24)
455
1847
OLIVER LAKE
100 I
26)
46 C
12)
88 I 23)
100 C
26)
79 I 20)
88
C 23)
501
1848
SYLVAN LAKE
4 I
1)
96 (
25)
27 4 7)
8 C
2)
79 C 20)
23
C 6)
237
1849
HOVEY LAKE
31 C
8)
38 C
10)
0
C 0)
0 C
0)
96 C 25)
12
C 3)
177
18S0
VERSAILLES LAKE
8 I
2)
31 C
8)
4
I 1)
27
1)
88 I 23)
IS
C 4)
173
185)
8ASS LAKE
42 I
11)
77 4
20)
19
I 5)
23 I
6)
100 C 26)
46
C 12)
307
1852
CROOKED LAKE
81 1
21)
100 C
26)
77
( 20)
81 I
21)
35
I 0)
75
1 19)
449
1853
LAKE JAMES
88
23)
92 I
24)
100
C 26)
96 C
25)
35
I 0)
75
C 19)
486
4854
LONG LAKE
0 C
0)
12 I
3)
44
I 11)
35 I
9)
35
0)
0
C 0)
126
1855
PIGEON LAKE
37 I
9)
8 1
2)
44
4 11)
46 C
12)
35
I 0)
27
I 7)
1 1
1856
MARSH LAKE
iS 4
4)
73 (
19)
35
I 9)
IS 4
4)
35
4 0)
4
4 1)
177
1857
HAMILTON LAKE
58 1
IS)
65 I
17)
73
C 19)
31 C
)
35
C 0)
19
C 5)
284
-------
LAKES RAPIKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
I 1836 WAWASEE LAKE 5 6
2 1847 OLIVER LAKE 501
3 1853 LAKE JAMES 486
4 1844 TIPPECANO( LAKE 462
S 1 43 LAKE MAXINKUCKEE 461
6 1B46 OLIN LAKE 455
7 1852 CROOKED LAKE 449
8 1828 MONROE RESEHVOIR 367
9 1837 WE8STER LAKE 361
10 1845 DALLAS LAKE 324
ii 1817 JAMES LAKE 323
12 1851 BASS LAKE 307
13 1841 WESTLER LAKE 306
14 1857 HAMILTON LAKE 281
15 1842 WITMER LAKE 279
16 1840 WINONA LAKE 260
17 1811 GEIST RESERVOIR 243
18 1848 SYLVAN LAKE 237
19 1805 CATaRACT LAKE 217
20 1855 PIGEON LAKE 197
21 1856 MARSH LAKE 177
22 1849 HOVEY LAKE 177
23 1850 VERSAILLES LAKE 173
24 1839 HITEWATER LAKE 157
25 1829 MORSE RESERVOIR 132
26 1854 LONG LAKE 126
27 1827 MISSISSINEWA RESERVOIR 105
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x l0 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR INDIANA 03/29/76
LAKE CODE 1843 LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S0 1 (M) 35.5
SUB—DRA IMAGE NORMALIZED FLOWS (CMS)
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO 1 (M) JAN FEB MAR APP MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
1843A1 35.5 0.419 0.507 0.728 0.677 0.436 0.334 0.198 0.065 0.065 0.068 0.173 0.323 0.332
1843A2 5.7 0.062 0.079 0.119 0.110 0.068 0.054 0.031 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.028 0.054 0.053
1843B1 6.5 0.071 0.091 0.136 0.125 0.079 0.062 0.037 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.031 0.062 0.060
1843C1 6.2 0.068 0.088 0.130 0.119 0.076 0.059 0.034 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.031 0.059. 0.058
1843ZZ 9.6 0.108 0.136 0.198 0.184 0.116 0.091 0.054 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.045 0.091 0.989
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 35.5 TOTAL FLOW IN 3.12
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 28.0 TOTAL FLOW OUT 3.99
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1843A1 6 73 0.651 10 0.821
7 73 0.204 17 0.099
8 73 0.198 20 0.127
9 73 0.062 10 0.054
10 73 0.062 17 0.045
11 73 0.127 16 0.074
12 73 0.311 27 0.425
1 74 0.708 22 0.566
2 74 0.850 12 0.821 26 0.850
3 74 1.048 14 1.303 25 0.934
4 74 0.595 16 0.708
5 74 0.481 14 0.510
1843A2 6 73 0.105 10 0.136
7 73 0.034 17 0.017
8 73 0.031 20 0.020
9 73 0.010 10 0.008
10 73 0.010 17 0.008
11 73 0.020 16 0.011
12 73 0.048 27 0.068
1 74 0.116 22 0.096
2 74 0.139 12 0.133 26 0.136
3 74 0.110 14 0.215 25 0.153
4 74 0.099 16 0.113
5 74 0.076 14 0.088
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR INDIANA 03/29/76
LAKE CODE 1843 LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
186381 6 73 0.119 10 0.153
7 73 0.040 17 0.017
8 73 0.034 20 0.023
9 73 0.011 10 0.008
10 73 0.011 17 0.008
11 73 0.024 16 0.014
12 73 0.057 27 0.076
1 74 0.133 22 0.105
2 74 0.159 12 0.153 26 0.153
3 74 0.193 14 0.241 25 0.170
4 74 0.113 16 0.125
5 74 0.088 14 0.099
1843C1 6 73 0.116 10 0.147
7 73 0.037 17 0.017
8 73 0.037 20 0.023
9 73 0.011 10 0.011
10 73 0.011 17 0.008
11 73 0.023 16 0.014
12 73 0.057 27 0.074
1 74 0.130 22 0.105
2 74 0.147 12 0.147 26 0.147
3 74 0.187 14 0.238 -25 0.170
4 74 0.110 16 0.125
5 74 0.088 14 0.096
1843ZZ 6 73 0.176 10 0.227
7 73 0.059 17 0.025
8 73 0.051 20 0.034
9 73 0.016 10 0.012
10 73 0.016 17 0.012
11 73 0.034 16 0.021
12 73 0.085 27 0.113
1 74 0.198 22 0.156
2 74 0.235 12 0.227 26 0.227
3 74 0.283 14 0.368 25 0.252
4 74 0.167 16 0.184
5 74 0.130 14 0.147
-------
APPENDIX 0
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
184301
41 12 51.0 086 24 42.0 3
LAKE HAAINKUCKEE
18099 INDIANA
051792
1 1EPALES
0032 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/02 14 30 0000
14 30 0004
14 30 0015
14 30 0028
73/08/03 15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0015
15 00 0030
15 00 0040
73/10/13 10 30 0000
10 30 0004
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.0 33
0.022
0.0 30
0.020
0.014
0.013
0.018
0.012
0.0 15
0.017
0.0 22
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/05/02
14 30
14 30
14 30
14 30
0000
0004
0015
0028
73/08/03
15 00
15 00
15 00
15 00
15 00
0000
0005
0015
0030
0040
73/10/13
10 30
10 30
0000
0004
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N021N03
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
MG/L
MG/I
MG/I
M6/L
NG/L P
14.0
108
400
8.30
155
0.080
14.0
9.5
400
8.30
154
0.070
0.600
0.500
0.22b
0.002
14.0
9.7
400
8.30
157
0.080
0.400
0.230
0,003
14.0
9.5
400
8.30
156
0.070
0.400
0.220
24.0
90
356
8.50
140
0.060
0.500
0.060
23.3
8.2
354
8.40
141
0.060
0.400
0.060
0.004
23.3
7.9
354
8.30
141
0.060
0.300
0.060
22.5
4.5
338
7.80
146
0.140
0.400
0.060
0.004
0.004
15.0
0.0
326
7.50
166
0.470
0.700
0.060
20.1
84
325
8.50
132
0.050
0.800
0.040
0.088
20.1
8.2
327
8.50
5.3
5.8
5.5
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
184302
41 11 48.0 086 24 06.0 3
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
18099 INDIANA
051792
11EPALES 2111202
0046 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK N113-N TOT KJ€L N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/I INCHES HICROMHO SU MG/I HG/L MG/L NG/L MG/L P
73/05/02 15 15 0000 13.9 132 400 8.30 156 0.080 0.700 0.220 0.003
15 15 0015 13.9 9.7 400 8.30 156 0.070 0.500 0.210 0.002
15 15 0028 13.9 9.7 400 8.30 157 0.070 0.600 0.220 0.002
15 15 0042 13.9 9.7 400 8.30 157 0.070 0.600 0.220 Q.S02
73/08/03 15 30 0000 24.7 84 360 8.50 140 0.080 0.500 0.080 0.003
15 30 0005 23.9 9.0 351 8.50 140 0.060 0.300 0.050 0.003
73/10/13 11 35 0000 19.5 322 8.30 135 0.100 1.000 0.040 0.014
11 35 0004 19.5 7.6 323 8.30 136 0.090 0.800 0.030 0.011
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/02 15 15 0000 0.022 4.7
15 15 0015 0.020
15 15 0028 0.023
15 15 0042 0.023
73/08/03 15 30 0000 0.013 5.7
15 30 0005 0.014
73/10/13 11 35 0000 0.024 5.9
11 35 0004 0.038
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1843A1
41 12 17.0 086 25 12.0 4
WILSON DITCH
18 7.5 CULVER
0/LAKE MAXINKUCKEE 051792
RD BRDG AT S EDGE OF CULVER
1IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/10 10 00 0.138 0.670 0.028 0.009 0.025
73/07/17 19 40 0.026 0.580 0.015 0.010 0.010
73/08/20 15 28 0.011 0.580 0.012 0.019 0.020
73/09/10 12 14 0.560 0.033 0.010 0.015
73/10/17 15 00 0.016 0.800 0.054 0.005K 0.050
73/11/16 10 15 0.046 0.550 0.064 0.005K 0.025
73/12/27 10 55 0.052 0.900 0.050 0.005 0.010
74/01/22 14 50 0.112 0.200 0.032 0.005 0.005
74/02/12 10 00 0.260 0.600 0.030 0.005K 0.010
74/02/26 10 55 0.232 0.600 0.050 0.005 0.025
74/03/14 14 40 0.288 1.100 0.045 0.005 0.005
74/03/25 10 15 0.264 0.700 0.050 0.005 0.020
74/04/16 11 35 0.312 0.700 0.040 0.005K 0.010
74/05/14 14 40 0.224 0.600 0.040 0.010 0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1843A2
41 13 16.0 086 23 46.0 4
WILSON DITCH
18 7.5 CULVER
1/LAKE MAXINKUCKEE 051792
ST RD 117 BRDG NEAR CULVE MILITARY ACAD
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NI-$3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/10 10 45 1.560 1.320 0.084 0.042 0.097
73/07/17 18 10 0.610 0.810 0.210 0.021 0.100
73/08/20 16 02 0.400 0.600 0.120 0.037 0.075
73/09/10 12 40 0.340 0.810 0.100 0.009 0.050
73/10/17 15 30 0.378 0.600 0.088 0.007 0.025
73/11/16 09 S5 0.180 0.300 0.048 0.005K 0.030
73/12/27 10 25 8.200 1.300 0.112 0.064 0.130
74/01/22 14 20 6.500 1.500 0.128 0.035 0.085
74/02/12 10 30 3.900 1,300 0.110 0.015 0.032
74/02/26 11 25 3.700 1.500 0.285 0.015 0.055
74/03/14 15 tO 2.520 1.100 0.075 0.020 0.030
74/03/25 10 40 2.100 1.200 0.130 0.010 0.030
74/04/16 11 30 1.600 1.000 0.055 0.010 0.030
74/05/14 15 05 1.840 1.200 0.065 0.025 0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
184381
41 10 46.0 086 23 12.0
UNNAMED CREEK
18 7.5 CULVER
T/LAKE MAX INKUCKEE
W 208 RD BRDG 4 MI SSE
1 1EP ALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
4
051792
OF CULVER
2111204
CLASS 00
DATE
TIME
DEPTi-4
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/I P
73/06/10
10
15
3.200
1.700
0.210
0.063
0.120
73/07/17
17
50
1.580
1.320
0.068
0.066
0.085
73/08/20
15
42
1.340
0.630
0.040
0.520
0.660
73/09/10
12
20
1.420
0.400
0.062
0.036
0.060
73/10/17
15
10
1.200
1.400
0.096
0.032
0.140
73/11/16
10
10
0.960
1.500
0.150
0.044
0.210
73/12/27
10
45
1.900
0.148
0.076
0.180
74/01/22
14
40
7.500
1.800
0.180
0.140
0.240
74/02/12
10
10
5.700
1.900
0.175
0.040
0.115
74/02/26
11
05
5.700
2.100
0.210
0.035
0.150
74/03/14
14
50
4.100
1.700
0.090
0.050
0.097
74/03/25
10
25
3.800
1.650
0.175
0.020
0.065
74/04/16
11
45
3.200
1.900
0.105
0.030
0.050
74/05/14
14
50
2.500
1.300
0.085
0.045
0.110
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1843C 1
41 12 14.0 086 23 18.0 4
CJRTISS DITCH
18 7.5 CULVER
1/LAKE MAXINKUCKEE 051792
ST RD 117 GROG NEAR E SIDE OF LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/10 10 25 0.252 3.100 0.120 0.048 0.420
73/07/17 18 00 0.084 0.750 0.026 0.018 0.055
73/08/20 15 58 0.357 2.900 0.200 0.066 0.540
73/09/10 12 30 0.176 0.560 0.050 0.030 0.075
73/10/17 15 20 0.198 0.950 0.073 0.018 0.055
73/11/16 10 00 0.132 0.750 0.035 0.020 0.080
73/12/27 10 35 4.800 1.500 0.216 0.144 0.240
74/01/22 14 30 4.400 0.800 0.084 0.075 0.105
74/02/12 10 20 2.600 0.900 0.090 0.030 0.050
74/02/26 11 15 2.520 1.500 0.165 0.030 0.070
74/03/1’. 15 00 1.600 0.700 0.030 0.015 0.020
74/03/25 10 30 1.200 0.600 0.040 0.010 0.020
74/04/16 11 35 0.720 1.300 0.070 0.015 0.030
74/05/14 15 00 0.570 0.900 0.040 0.025 0.060
------- |