U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
FONTANALAKE
SWAIN AND GRAHAM COUNTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 379
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•fcOPO 697.O32
-------
REPORT
ON
FONTANALAKE
SWAIN AND GRAHAM COUNTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 379
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
AND THE
NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of North Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non—point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans Implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the North Carolina Department
of Natural and Economic Resources for professional involvement
and to the North Carolina National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey.
Lewis R. Martin, Director of the Division of Environmental
Management; Darwin L. Coburn, Chief of the Water Quality Section;
and Julian R. Taylor, Supervisor of the Monitoring Program Unit;
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the
Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General William M. Buck, formerly Adjutant General of
North Carolina, and Project Officer Colonel Arthur J. Bouchard,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the North Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Badin Montgomery, Stanly
Blewett Falls Anson, Richmond
Chatuge Clay, NC; Towns, GA
Fontana Graham, Swain
Hickory Alexander, Caidwell,
Ca tawba
High Rock Davidson, Rowan
Hiwassee Cherokee
James Burke, McDowell
John H. Kerr (Nut Bush Creek) Granville, Vance, Warren,
NC; Halifax, Mecklenburg,
VA
Junaluska Haywood
Lookout Shoals Alexander, Catawba, Iredell
Mountain Island Gaston, Mecklenburg
Norman Catawba, Iredell, Lincoln,
Mecki enburg
Rhodhiss Burke, Caidwell
Santeetlah Graham
Tillery Montgomery, Stanly
Waccamaw Columbus
Waterville Haywood
Wylie Gaston, Mecklenburg, NC;
York, SC
-------
Map Location
V*IYn.sviIh(
FONTANA LAKE
Lake Sampling Site
Tributary Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
9 Km.
IQAndrews
-------
FONTANA LAKE
STORET NO. 3704
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Fontana Lake is mesotrophic.
It ranked fifth in overall trophic quality when the 16 North
Carolina lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combina-
tion of six parameters*. None of the other lakes had less
but one had the same median total phosphorus, six had less
and one had the same median orthophosphorus, ten had less
median inorganic nitrogen, none had less mean chlorophyll a,
and only one lake had a greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
The anoxic water stratum reported by Louder and Baker (1966)
was evident during the August Survey sampling at stations 1, 2,
3, and 4 and again in October at stations 1 and 2 (see data in
Appendix 0).
Survey limnologists did not observe any concentrations of
algae or macrophytes.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Fontana Lake was
phosphorus limited at the time the sample was collected (06/02/73).
The lake data further substantiate limitation by phosphorus; i.e.,
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
the mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios were
71 to 1 or higher at all sampling times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--During the sampling year, the phosphorus
contributions of point sources amounted to 5.0% of the total
load reaching Fontana Lake. The origins were the wastewater
treatment facilities at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee
(2.1%), Bryson City (1.2%), Sylva (1.4%), and Dilisboro (0.3%).
The present loading rate of 2.88 g/n1 2 /yr is 1.7 times the rate
proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a
eutrophic rate (see page 15). Since the lake is phosphorus
limited and currently receives a relatively high phosphorus
load, all phosphorus inputs should be minimized to reduce the
eutrophication rate to the greatest possible extent to preserve
the existing high water quality of Fontana Lake.
2. Non—point sources-—The mean annual contribution from
non-point sources represented 95.0% of the total phosphorus
load impacting Fontana Lake. The Little Tennessee River
contributed 42.2%; the Tuckasegee River, 34.0%; the Nantahala
River, 4.2%; and the three other gaged tributaries collectively
contributed 3.3% of the total. The contributions from ungaged
tributaries were estimated to be 10.7% of the total load.
-------
The non-point phosphorus export rate of the Little
Tennessee River was 46 kg/km2/yr during the sampling year.
This rate is somewhat higher than the export rates of the
other Fontana Lake tributaries (see page 15). However,
this river basin is quite large, and there may have been
unmeasured point sources outside the vicinity of Fontana
Lake which increased the export rate. Generally, the
export rates of Fontana Lake tributaries were comparable
to the rates of tributaries to nearby Hiwassee Lake* (mean
= 18 kg/km2/yr; range of 10 to 37 kg/km2/yr) and Santeetlah
Lake** (mean of 17 kg/km2/yr; range of 5 to 38 kg/km'/yr);
and it appears that such export rates are typical for western
North Carolina streams.
There was a substantial annual nitrogen loss from Fontana
Lake which could very probably be explained by the situation
in the Tuckasegee River Arm of the Reservoir as described by
Louder and Baker (op. cit.). The Tuckasegee Arm of the Reservoir
apparently has extensive sludge deposits, presumably from
municipal and/or industrial wastes, which cause the anaerobic
stratum in the lake reported by the authors and detected during
the Survey. Under anaerobic conditions, ammonia-nitrogen could
be solubilized from the bottom sludges which would result in an
internal contribution to the total nitrogen load and therefore
* Working Paper No. 382.
** Working Paper No. 389.
-------
4
account for the imbalance of nitrogen discharged from the lake
versus external nitrogen loadings to the lake.
The nitrogen export rate of the Tuckasegee River basin was
extremely high (1,503 kg/krn 2 /yr), and an nonia concentrations in
the river were also high though the phosphorus export rate was
in the normal range. This indicates either that an upstream
point source was contributing excessive loadings of nitrogen to
the basin or that substantial quantities of nitrogen were being
solubilized from sediments within the river.
-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometrytt:
1. Surface area: 43.18 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 41.3 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 134.1 meters.
4. Volume: 1,782 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 179 days (based on outlet flow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1 . Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km 2 )* ( m 3 fsec)*
Little Tennessee River 1,139.6 29.6
Tuckasegee River 1,706.8 43.6
Alarka Creek 80.8 3.0
Nantahala River 427.3 15.6
Panther Creek 28.7 0.6
Stecoah Creek 27.2 1.0
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 615.3 21.4
Totals 4,025.7 114.8
2. Outlet -
Little Tennessee River 4,068.9** 115.5
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 147.7 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 120.6 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions--Appendix B.
tt Louder and Baker, 1966.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods,
1973-1976”.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
6
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Fontana Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
seven stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(4.6 m to surface) sample was composited from the seven stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, two 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth—integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 83.8 meters at station 1, 61.0 meters at station 2,
71.6 meters at station 3, 43.0 meters at station 4, 47.2 meters at
station 5, 32.9 meters at station 6, and 29.3 meters at station 7.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
A SuMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOP FONTANA LArE
STORET CODE 3704
1 ST SAMPLING ( 6/ 2/73) 2ND SAMPLING ( 8/21/73) 3RD SAMPLING (10/26/73)
7 SITES 7 SITES 7 SITES
PARA’IETEP RANGE MEAN r.IEDIAN HANGE MEAN MEDIAN RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
TEMP (C) 9.8 — 24.fl 15.7 15.3 16.4 — 27.6 22.6 22.5 16.5 — 21.3 20.1 20.5
DISS OXY (MG/L) 7.0 — 10.0 8.2 8.1 0.1 — 9.0 5.0 5.2 0.8 — 7.8 4.7 4.5
CNDCTVY (MCPOHO) 50. — 0. 50. 50. 18. — 69. 26. 25. 22. — 46. 28. 27.
PH (STAND UNITS) 6.5 - 8.’ 6.9 6.9 5.3 — 8.2 6.2 5.9 5.9 — 6.7 6.3 6.3
TOT AL.K (MG/L) 10. — 16. 11. 10. 10. — 24. 12. 10. 10. — 14. 10. 10.
TOT ° (MG/LI 0.009 — 0.135 0.037 0.030 0.006 — 0.059 0.014 0.010 0.005 — 0.190 0.017 0.010
OPTHD P (Mr,,L) p.002 — 0.032 0.007 0.007 0.003 — 0.016 0.006 0.006 0.004 — 0.025 0.009 0.008
N02.N03 (MG/LI 0.I’C — 0.700 0.302 0.260 0.060 — 0.970 0.345 0.240 0.120 — 0.870 0.538 0.630
AMMONIA (MG/LI 0.060 — 0.730 0.197 0.I2C 0.040 — 1.620 0.259 0.120 0.020 — 1.720 0.233 0.130
KJEL N (M(,/1 I ,.?0O — 1.000 0.353 0.200 0.200 — 2.300 0.573 0.400 0.200 — 3.100 0.507 0.300
INOPG N (MG/LI 0. IRO — 1.050 0.500 0.450 0.160 — 1.790 0.604 0.450 0.250 — 2.190 0.771 0.740
TOTAL N (MG/LI ( .3’0 — l.?70 0.655 0.580 0.300 — 2.430 0.918 0.810 0.420 — 3.680 1.040 0.860
CHLRPYL A (uPC,/LI 0.8 6.6 2. 3.2 2.3 — 6.1 4.6 4.7 1.3 — 5.1 2.8 2.7
SFCCHI (METEPS) O. 1 — ?.7 1.4 1.3 1.7 — 4.6 2.9 2.3 2.5 — 4.6 3.7 4.0
-------
8
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton —
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
06/02/73 1. Cyclotella 1,581
(stations 1, 2, 3, 2. Melosira 566
and 4) 3. Flagellates 189
4. Tabellaria 71
5. Asterionella 71
Other genera 24
Total 2,502
06/03/73 1. Cyclotella 2,202
(stations 5, 6, & 7) 2. Flagellates 839
3. Melosira 760
4. Tabellaria 65
5. Asterionella 65
Other genera 93
Total 4,024
08/21/73 1. Flagellates 894
2. Cyclotella 623
3. Blue-green filaments 244
4. Dinoflagellates 81
5. Melosira 54
Other genera 271
Total 2,167
10/26/73 1. Synedra 267
2. Flagellates 187
3. Cyclotella 178
4. Tabellaria 125
5. Melosira 98
Other genera 81
Total 936
-------
9
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( ig/l )
06/02-03/73 01 2.3
02 2.3
03 3.2
04 3.5
05 3.6
06 0.8
07 4.6
08/21/73 01 3.6
02 4.7
03 2.3
04 3.8
05 6.0
06 5.8
07 6.1
10/26/73 01 1.3
02 1.5
03 2.2
04 2.8
05 2.7
06 4.0
07 5.1
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. Stations 1, 2, and 3 -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/l) Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i) ( mg/i-dry wt. )
Control 0.004 0.656 0.1
0.050 0.054 0.656 9.4
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.054 1.656 9.1
1.0 N 0.004 1.656 0.1
-------
10
Inorganic N
Conc. (mall )
0.244
0.244
1 .244
1 .244
Maximum yield
( mq/]-dry wt. )
0.1
4.5
12.3
0.1
b. Stations 4, 5, 6, and 7 -
Ortho P
Spike (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i ) _________ ____
Control 0.008
0.050 P 0.058
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.058
1.0 N 0.008
3. Discussion —
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Fontana Lake was low at the time the samples were col-
lected. The addition of phosphorus alone resulted in in-
creased algal yields and indicates phosphorus limitation.
Note that addition of only nitrogen resulted in yields the
same as those of the controls.
The lake data obtained at the various sampling times
further substantiate limitation by phosphorus. The mean N/P
ratios were 71/1 or greater on all occasions.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the North Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff months of January and February when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in March, 1973, and was completed in
February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the North Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for
the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsanipled “minor tributaries and imediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /year, at stations C—l and E-l and multiplying
the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
The operator of the Western Carolina University wastewater treat-
,ment plant provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow
data which were used to calculate the nutrient loads. Sylva, Bryson
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
City, and Dilisboro did not participate in the sampling program. Nu-
trient loads from Sylva and Bryson City, which have secondary treatment,
were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year. Nutrient
loads from Dillsboro, which has no waste treatment, were estimated at
1.587 kg P and 4,623 kg N/capita/year.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known muncipal —
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment ( m 3 /d) Water
Bryson City 1,290* act. sludge 488.3** Fontana Lake
Western 5,287*** trickling 2,001.3 Cullowhe Creek
Carolina U. filter
Sylva 1,561* act, sludge 590.8** Scott Creek
Dilisboro 215* none 8l.4** Tuckasegee River
2. Known industrial - None
* 1970 Census.
** Estimate based on 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
Estimate based on actual mean flow; includes population of Cullowhee.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading — Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) —
Little Tennesse River 52,360 42.2
Tuckasegee River 42,250 34.0
Alarka Creek 2,625 2.1
Nantahala River 5,180 4.2
Panther Creek 310 0.3
Stecoah Creek 1,105 0.9
b. Minor tributaries & ini ediate
drainage (non-point load) - 13,320 10.7
c. Known municipal STP’s —
Bryson City 1,465 1.2
Dilisboro 340 0.3
Western Carolina U. 2,670 2.1
Sylva 1,770 1.4
d. Septic tanks* - 25 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None -
f. Direct precipitation** - 755 0.6
Total 124,175 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet — Little Tennessee R. 65,830
3. Net annual P accumulation — 58,345 kg.
* Estimate based on 50 lakeshore dwellings, four campsites, and three
parks; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Little Tennessee River 566,520 15.0
Tuckasegee River 2,565,510 67.9
Alarka Creek 42,690 1.1
Nantahala River 273,530 7.3
Panther Creek 6,155 0.2
Stecoah Creek 29,305 0.8
b. Minor tributaries & irmiediate
drainage (non-point load) — 228,520 6.1
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Bryson City 4,390 0.1
Dilisboro 915 <0.1
Western Carolina U. 7,695 0.2
Sylva 5,310 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 920 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Direct precipitation** - 46,615 1.2
Total 3,778,075 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Little Tennessee
River 5,279,760
3. Net annual N loss — 1,501,685 kg.
* Estimate based on 50 lakeshore dwellings, four campsites, and three
parks; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdralnage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
Little Tennessee River 46 497
Tuckasegee River 25 1,503
Alarka Creek 32 528
Nantahala River 12 640
Panther Creek 11 214
Stecoah Creek 41 1,077
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
welder and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 2.88 1.35 87.5 loss*
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Fontana Lake:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 1.74
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.87
* The apparent loss of nitrogen from the lake during the sampling year is
most probably due to nitrogen solubilization in bottom sludges in the
Tuckasegee River Arm (see page 3).
-------
16
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Louder, Darrell E., and W. Donald Baker, 1966. Some interesting
limnological aspects of Fontana Reservoir. Proc. 20th Ann.
Conf. SE Assoc. Game & Fish Comm., Asheville, NC, pp. 380-390.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
17
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 3719 LAKE WACCAMAW 534
2 3716 SANTEELAH LAKE 446
3 3711 MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE 419
4 3707 HIWASSEE LAKE 414
5 3704 FONTANA LAKE 392
6 3713 LAKE NORMAN 346
7 3708 LAKE JAMES 334
8 3710 LOOKOUT SHOALS 327
9 3715 RHODHISS LAKE 296
10 3705 LAKE HICKORY 283
11 3717 LAKE TILLERY 246
12 3709 LAKE JUNALUSKA 220
13 3702 BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 200
14 3718 WATERVILLE RESERVOIR 140
15 3701 BADIN LAKE 124
16 3706 HIGH ROCK LAKE 76
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEX
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CHLORA NIH DO DISS ORTHO P NO
3701 BADIN LAKE 33 ( 5) 7 ( 1) 27 ( 4) 27 C 4) 3 C 0) 27 C 4) 124
3702 BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 7 ( 1) 13 C 2) 7 C 1) 73 C 11) 93 C 14) 7 ( 1) 200
3704 FONTANA LAKE 100 C 15) 33 ( 5) 93 C 14) 100 C 15) 3 ( 0) 63 ( 9) 392
3705 LAKE HICKORY 27 C 4) 60 ( 9) 53 C 8) 13 C 2) 80 ( 12) 50 ( 7) 283
3706 HIGH ROCK LAKE 13 ( 2) 20 C 3) 0 C 0) 0 ( 0) 23 C 2) 20 C 3) 76
3707 HIWASSEE LAKE 87 C 13) 80 C 12) 87 C 13) 47 C 7) 50 C 7) 63 ( 9) 414
3708 LAKE JAMES 60 C 9) 87 C 13) 80 C 12) 7 C 1) 23 C 2) 77 C 11) 334
3709 LAKE JUNALUSKA 47 ( 7) 27 ( 4) 43 C 6) 20 C 3) 50 C 7) 33 ( 5) 220
3710 LOOKOUT SHOALS 53 C 8) 47 C 7) 60 ( 9) 67 C 10) 60 ( 9) 40 ( 6) 327
3711 MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE 73 C 11) 73 C 11) 43 C 6) 53 1 8) 87 C 13) 90 C 13) 419
3713 LAKE NORMAN 67 ( 10) 53 C 8) 73 C 11) 40 C 6) 23 1 2) 90 C 13) 346
3715 RHODHISS LAKE 20 ( 3) 67 C 10) 33 C 5) 93 1 14) 70 ( 10) 13 1 2) 296
3716 SANTEELAH LAKE 93 C 14) 93 C 14) 100 C 15) 60 1 9) 23 1 2) 77 C 11) 446
3717 LAKE TILLERY 40 ( 6) 40 C 6) 13 C 2) 33 C 5) 70 C 10) 50 C 7) 246
3718 WATERVILLE RESERVOIR 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 20 C 3) 80 1 12) 40 1 6) 0 C 0) 140
3719 LAKE WACCAMAW
80 C 12) 100 C 15) 67 C 10) 87 C 13) 100 C 15) 100 C 15)
534
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CHLORA MIN DO DISS ORTHO P
3701 BADIN LAKE 0.042 0.680 466.750 7.190 14.900 0.012
3702 BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 0.090 0.655 476.889 4.167 10.800 0.034
3704 FONTANA LAKE 0.011 0.550 392.650 3.438 14.900 0.007
3705 LAKE HICKORY 0.047 0.320 461.000 7.275 13.400 0.008
3706 HIGH ROCK LAKE 0.090 0,580 477.454 14.283 14.800 0.017
3707 HIWASSEE LAKE 0.015 0.240 420.555 5.678 14.200 0.007
3708 LAKE JAMES 0.020 0.160 428.866 7.660 14.800 0.006
3709 LAKE JUNALUSKA 0.031 0.560 462.000 7.233 14.200 0.009
3710 LOOKOUT SHOALS 0.026 0.370 459.167 4.200 13.800 0.008
3711 MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE 0.018 0.270 462.000 5.580 12.800 0.005
3713 LAKE NORMAN 0.019 0.330 446.667 5.807 14.800 0.005
3715 RHODHISS LAKE 0.061 0.305 462.111 3.578 13.600 0.019
3716 SANTEELAH LAKE 0.011 0.160 366.400 5.360 14.800 0.006
3717 LAKE TILLERY 0,040 0.470 468.600 6.827 13.600 0.008
3718 WATERVILLE RESERVOIR 0.103 0.860 468.333 3.817 14.400 0.041
3719 LAKE WACCAMAW 0.018 0.120 455.667 3.583 9.800 0.004
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 1O = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
— L 1 1 f t
I/l U/ i : ,
L F C0fl • 37(’4
t 1 M4
TOTAL ‘ AlNA ’E AI - EA OF L th(cQ .< 1l
TOTAL O i .TNAGE AMEA OF IA I: r
SUM OF SU —D2A1MAflL PFAS =
TP1 ’J1A. I MO’ 1.-1 yrA.
‘IE , . L’’ q )A T’ 1- L’ v (JAY
rLO .4 I)AY FLO (
S I j—1WAINA(. , ’
N -4ALJ7t ) FL() S(CM ,)
TPT ’JTA 4Y
ADEA 4SO
K I)
J j
F1
‘Ar
ur
J AY
J J (I
JUL
AJG
SEP
OCT
NOV
Dec
MEAN
170 4A 1
60 6P.
116.?.’
!Oc . 17
‘4.,
11.3 , ,
l0 ).jl
117.68
124.31
132.81
128.25
242.19
115.66
37 04A?
1 114.6
‘7.’).’
‘.5.7)
‘.e . (7
‘ .‘4.tU
‘.- ‘
?S.i -
2O.2
17.41
18.68
18.29
?0. 1
28.91
29.59
17044 1
I706. ’
5 ’..74
67.
7 1.I ’
61. ’. -4
4”.3 ’
1. .1
3I.’ 3
29. 0
24.81
25.12
29.59
42.93
43.58
1704C1
80.8
‘..h1
C •4
9• 4
4.26
‘•L7
2.2.’
2.27
1.10
1.42
1.42
1.98
3.26
3.04
370601
627.3
17.41
? 4•)3
19.8-’
19.56
I6.w
I.7?
13.46
13.45
13.& (
12.46
11.75
12.88
15.59
1704E1
28.7
O. -4U
1.1
1.14
3.91
)
‘14’,
0.48
0.40
3.27
0.28
0.42
0.68
0.65
3706F I
77•7
I .--
i •
I • 11-
1 • ‘.2
1 • 0?
0 • /6
0 76
0 • 57
0.45
0.48
0.68
1 .OM
1.02
3704Z7.
F .5ci.4
4 .’;
3- .7 -
3/.1
‘ .3
21.”.
16.4.
15.14
11.15
43.78
8.78
13.31
22.94
21.40
UFAJI 9()94*-ILY FLO4’ A9) AILY FL ) SIC1 )
.0 MA-(Y
‘ . ‘6 .i. - )
TOTAL
FLOW
IN
=
1382.97
40 . ,M.9
IOTAL
FLOW
OUT
=
1382.91
3704A1 3
73
l€.-
2 ?.’. . f
—-4-- ---
—7-1-—
‘ .°O
‘,•1
5
73
I70.I
27
17—.’) )
‘
i:i
7
71
16C.17
I
1- }. - 7
2’-
fll.0S
8
73
h0.5 2
49
J - ’ .. .4
‘1
73
55.9’-
‘
4 ). . l
Ifl
74
l ’1.1 .
Ii
t?7. 14
Ii
I ‘7.’ .1
II
I4J.?M
I ’
7
4’.7 .54
t7-.. Si
4
74
- 3 ’.I’.
6
-l.11
2.’
‘54.7’.
2
7 .
1(
)5/•4 -.4
7 .
“5 ’ . p5
1
73
7 ’- .I ’.
?
5 ’I
4
73
‘-‘ .-.‘- ‘
“
‘. ‘-.- I
5
74
)7
4 -,•’.,
F)
7 3
‘ . .-. - -
7
73
-)‘-. 31
I
- -. I /
?2.65
73
. ç-)
I’-.
‘ .‘
4
1 4
15 .L.i
9
l,..4i
I
/ 1
1’.””
4
4 • 4’
I l
7’
‘‘.4 . 3
1’
i .- ’-’
4)
7 ,
(.5.11
-4
4D.1 1
I
7 ’ .
74• ’
£. ) •4’.*
‘
I ’ .
I
- .u. ’
-------
T ?I6L1T4I’7Y L’ 4 1,IFr MArL0N FUN NU T.1 CA
-------
tP! 3IJTA ?Y FLO”I I’ FUkM FIO’4 FO NOrETH CAROLINA
1 / 10/75
LA’(E CODE 170”
ONTANA LAKE-.
MEAN ‘-IONTHLY FLO ’dS AND )A1LY FLI)WS(CMS)
-3
‘4
5
7
8
q
25
28
27
TP!RUTA Y MONT’-4 Y AR MEAN FLO AI flAY FLOW
DAY
FLOW DAY FLOw
3704F1
2.27
2.97
3.11
3704ZZ
0.96
0.51
0.59
0.42
0 • 37
1.41
2.55
1.70
29
20
24
0.57
1.13
2.55
1
19
9
13
11
9
6
10
73
1.98
73
1.90
73
?.27
73
1.56
73
0.91
71
o.iq
7 3
0.57
10
73
0.4?
11
73
0.82
17
73
1.98
‘I
74
2.83
?
74
1.70
3
73
3 .R3
4
73
26.90
5
73
?R.3
71
16.99
7
73
12.74
8
73
11.33
9
73
8.50
10
73
7.08
11
73
14.16
17
73
72.65
1
74
39.64
2
74
37.38
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DAlE 75/01/07
370401
35 27 13.0 083 48 16.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
11EPAL€S 2111202
3 0300 FEET DEPTH
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT
KJEL
N02&N03
PsIOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMIIO
SU
MG/L
MG/L
146/L
MG/L
MG/I P
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/06/02
09 45 0000
20.5
108
50K
7.00
lOX
0.210
0.500
0.410
0.003
09 45 0005
20.1
9.0
50K
7.00
10K
0.190
0.300
0.410
0.002K
09 45 0027
17.5
9.0
50K
7.00
09 45 0050
15.8
8.2
50K
6.80
U
0.400
0.400
0.380
0.007
09 45 0080
14.1
8.4
50K
6.80
09 45 0110
12.9
8.1
50K
6.60
10K
0.120
0.200K
0.580
0.006
09 45 0150
11.6
8.4
50 k
6.60
10K
0.070
0.200K
0.680
0.004
09 45 0200
11.0
8.4
50K
6.50
10
0.060
0.200K
0.680
0.008
09 45 0250
10.6
8.0
50K
6.60
10
0.090
0.200K
0.700
0.003
73/08/21
09 45 0275
10.2
7.8
50K
6.60
10K
0.060
0.200K
0.600
0.005
12 35 0000
26.8
180
27
8.20
14
0.140
0.500
0.210
0.010
12 35 0005
26.5
8.0
23
8.00
10K
0.140
0.300
0.200
0.0 6
12 35 0015
26.1
7.8
25
7.70
10K
0.210
0.400
0.220
0.011
12 35 0030
23.7
4.2
26
7.30
10K
0.380
0.700
0.330
0.006
12 35 0050
22.3
3.6
22
6.90
10K
0.150
0.400
0.590
0.006
12 35 0075
20.2
4.0
21
6.90
10K
0.050
0.200K
0.690
0.005
12 35 0100
18.9
5.0
18
6.70
10K
0.040
0.200K
0.610
0.006
12 35 0125
18.0
5.4
20
6.70
10K
0.040
0.200K
0.610
0.006
12 35 0150
17.2
5.6
20
6.40
10K
0.050
0.200K
0.650
0.007
12 35 0180
16.6
4.6
23
6.40
lOX
0.040
0.200K
0.710
0.006
73/10/26
12 50 0000
20.6
168
27
6.50
10K
0.100
0.500
0.660
0.109
12 50 0005
20.5
5.6
27
6.30
10K
0.080
0.200K
0.660
0.069
12 50 0020
20.5
4.8
26
6.20
10K
0.080
0.200K
0.660
0.009
12 50 0035
20.5
5.2
27
6.20
10K
0.080
0.200K
0.640
0.008
12 50 0050
20.5
4.6
27
6.30
lOX
0.060
0.200K
0.630
0.008
12 50 0075
20.5
4.8
26
6.20
10K
0.080
0.200K
0.640
0.008
12 50 0100
20.4
3.8
27
5.90
10K
0.060
0.200K
0.700
0.007
12 50 0125
19.6
1.8
26
6.00
10K
0.030
0.200K
0.870
0.008
12 50 0150
19.1
1.9
27
6.00
10K
0.020
0.200K
0.820
0.011
12 50 0180
18.5
3.2
28
6.20
10K
0.030
0.200K
0.580
0.007
12 50 0200
17.7
3.8
26
6.30
10K
0.030
0.200K
0.380
0.008
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET REIRIFVAL DATE 75/01/07
370401
35 27 13.0 083 48 16.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
00665 3?2 17
DEPTH RI-lOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
2.3
3.6
1.3
2111202
0300 FEET DEPTH
O TE
FR OH
TO
TIME
OF
DAY FEET
1 1EPALES
3
73/06/02
09
45
0000
0.014
09
45
0005
C.011
04
45
0050
0.010
(19
45
0110
0.009
39
45
0150
0.010
09
45
0?00
0.0 10
09
45
0750
0.011
09
45
0275
0.0 11
73/08/21
12
12
1?
1?
12
1?
12
1?
1?
1.
15
35
15
35
35
35
35
15
35
35
0000
0005
0015
0010
0050
0075
0100
01?5
0150
0)80
0.008
0.00
0.010
0.008
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.011
71/10/26
17
1?
1?
1
12
12
1
1
1
)2
12
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0005
00?0
0035
0050
0075
0100
0125
0)50
0180
0 O0
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.005
0.006
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370402
35 26 42.0 083 43 37.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0170 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 0007? 00094 00400 00410 00610 00825 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATEP DO TRANSP CNDUCTvY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03 P1105—015
FROM OF TEMP SECCI-II FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT HG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/LP
73/06/0? 13 00 0000 ‘2.2 96 50K 6.90 10K 0.2S0 0.600 0.4 0 0.003
13 00 0005 21.5 9.4 50K 6.90
13 00 0027 17.1 7.6 50K 6.80
13 00 0050 15.8 7.8 50K 6.70
13 00 0075 14.3 7.6 50K 6.70 10K 0.420 0.500 0.360 0.010
13 00 0100 13.3 8.0 50K 6.70 10K 0.270 0.400 0.450 0.004
13 00 0125 12.1 7.6 50K 6.60 10K 0.110 0.200K 0.680 0.007
13 00 0165 11.3 7.4 50K 6.50
73/08/21 13 15 0000 26.7 162 26 6.40 10K 0.190 0.300 0.250 0.004
13 15 0005 26.7 7.8 25 6.70 10K 0.180 0.200 0.240 0.004
13 15 0015 25.9 7.0 24 6.40 10K 0.340 0.600 0.310 0.006
13 15 0030 23.8 0.2 28 5.80 10K 0.110 0.200K 0.970 0.005
13 15 0050 ?2.2 1.0 25 5.80 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.930 0.004
13 15 0075 20.1 1.8 23 5.80 10K 0.060 0.200K 0.910 0.006
13 15 0100 18.8 2.8 22 5.80 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.810 0.004
13 15 0125 17.9 3.8 21 5.80 10K 0.050 0.200K 0.750 0.005
13 15 0140 17.4 4.2 19 5.80 10K 0.050 0.200K 0.720 0.004
73/10/26 13 40 0000 20.8 180 30 6.40 10K 0.160 0.400 0.740 0.007
13 40 0010 20.6 4.4 29 6.20 10K 0.160 0.200 0.750 0.008
13 40 0025 20.6 4.4 28 6.30 10K 0.170 0.200 0.750 0.010
13 40 0050 20.6 4.6 28 6.30 10K 0.160 0.200 0.750 0.008
13 40 0075 20.6 4.6 28 6.20 10K 0.160 0.200 0.740 0.007
13 40 0100 20.2 0.8 26 6.00 10K 0.030 0.200K 0.800 0.008
13 40 015( 19.1 4.6 26 6.30 10K 0.030 0.200K 0.330 0.010
13 40 0200 17.9 4.0 26 6.30 10K 0.030 0.200K 0.280 0.009
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE -
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370402
3 26 42.0 083 43 37.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
1 1EPALES
3
2111202
0170 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/02 13 00 0000
13 00 0075
13 00 0100
11 00 0125
73/08/21 13 15 0000
13 15 0005
13 15 0015
13 15 0030
13 15 0050
13 15 0075
13 15 0100
13 15 0125
13 15 0140
73/10/26 13 40 0000
13 40 0010
13 40 0025
13 40 0050
13 40 0075
13 40 0100
13 40 0150
13 40 000
0.017
0.011
0.010
0.0 10
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.00 8
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.008
32217
C HL P P H YL
A
(JG/L
00665
DEPTH PHOS—TOT
TIME
OF
DAY FEET
MG/L P
2.3
4.7
1.5
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370403
35 26 09.0 083 35 08.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0240 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 0067*
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL 00USD
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/I MG/L MG/L MG/k MG/S. P
73/06/02 14 00 0000 24.0 70 50K 7.80
14 00 0005 21.8 9.6 50K 7.50
14 00 0017 18.3 8.0 50K 7.10
14 00 0020 17.6 7.8 50K 6.90
14 00 0030 17.0 8.0 50K 6.80
14 00 0050 16.2 8.0 50K 6.70
14 00 0075 14.8 7.7 50K 6.70 10K 0.110 0.200K 0.160
14 00 0100 12.9 9.1 50K 6.70 10K 0.080 0.200k 0.120 0.032
14 00 0150 11.5 8.6 50K 6.70 10 0.140 0.200k 0.320’ 0.009
14 00 0200 10.8 8.0 50K 6.60 10K 0.170 0.2 90K 0.381 0.005
14 00 0235 10.5 7.0 50K 6.50 12 0.210 0.300 0.411
73/08/21 13 55 0000 27.4 136 27 6.20 lOX 0.310 0.600 0.230
13 55 0005 27.3 4.8 26 6.10 10K 0.350 0.600 0.230
13 55 0015 26.5 5.8 31 6.00 10K 0.600 0.900 I.
13 55 0030 23.7 2.6 35 5.90 10 1.250 1.500 0.440 0.901
13 55 0050 22.3 1.6 24 5.80 10K 0.060 0.400 0.830 0.105
13 55 0075 20.3 5.2 22 5.80 10 0.060 0.2 00K 0.250 0.009
13 55 0100 18.9 6.0 21 5.90 10 0.060 0.200K 0.130
13 55 0130 17.8 5.4 20 5.80 lOX 0.040 0.200K 0.300 0.084
13 55 0160 16.9 4.6 20 5.80 10K 0.060 0.200K 0.450 0.001
13 55 0190 16.4 2.4 23 5.60 11 0.090 0.200K 0.360
73/10/26 14 20 0000 21.0 180 30 6.30 10K 0.360 0.400 0.760 0.0*0
14 20 0010 20.7 4.2 31 6.20 lOX 0.370 0.500 0.760 0.080
14 20 0030 20.6 4.0 30 6.20 lOX 0.340 0.600 0.740 0.001
14 20 0050 20.6 4.0 33 6.10 14 0.320 0.750 0.025
14 20 0100 20.2 3.6 37 6.40 10K 0.850 1.100 0.320 0.085
14 ?0 0170 18.8 3.4 36 6.30 10K 1.720 1.900 0.470 0.012
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STr)p!T RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370403
35 26 09.0 033 35 08.0
FO 1ANA LAKE
37173 NO T9 CA u1INA
lIEPALES 2111202
3 0240 FEET OEPTH
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P
73/06/0? 14 00 0000 3.2
14 00 0075 0.053
14 00 0100 0.03?
14 00 0150 0.017
14 00 0200 0.016
14 00 0235 0.019
73/08/21 13 55 0000 0.008 2.3
13 55 0005 0.008
13 55 0015 0.010
13 55 0030 0.009
13 55 0050 0.009
13 55 0075 0.006
13 55 0100 0.009
13 55 0130 0.007
13 55 0160 0.009
13 55 0190 0.012
73/10/26 14 ?0 0000 0.010 2.2
14 20 0010 0.008
14 ?0 0030 0.010
14 P0 0100 0.016
14 P0 0170 0.041
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370404
35 26 32.0 083 33 19.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
1IEPALES 2111202
3 0145 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDuCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICPOMHO SU MG/L MG/ I. MG/I NG/L 8/L P
73/06/02 15 30 0000 21.7 50K 6.90 10K 0.390 1.000 0.270 0.116
15 30 0006 20.7 9.6 50K 7.30 10K 0.320 0.500 0.230 0.004
15 30 0015 18.4 8.4 50K 7.00 101< 0.560 0.700 0.260 1 .00*
15 10 0030 15.7 8.4 50K 6.90 10K 0.620 0.700 0.260 1.106
15 30 0050 15.2 8.4 501< 6.90 10K 0.520 0.600 0.200 1.106
15 30 0075 14.5 7.6 50K 6.70 101< 0.440 0.800 0.330 1. 1 11
15 30 0100 11.8 7.2 501< 6.70 101< 0.730 0.900 0.320 0.006
15 30 0120 10.6 7.0 50K 6.60 101< 0.700 0.800 0.340 •.0I7
15 30 0141 10.1
73/08/21 14 30 0000 26.7 90 28 5.90 101< 0.450 0.900 0.240 0.006
14 30 0005 p6.7 7.8 23 5.90 101< 0.420 0.800 0.230 1.1 14
14 30 0015 25.3 5.4 32 5.80 11 0.960 1.700 0.270 0.004
14 30 0030 23.7 5.8 31 5.70 11 1.310 1.800 0.280 •.S05
14 30 0050 22.4 4.2 39 5.60 11 1.460 2.100 0.330 0.007
14 30 0075 ?O.l 0.4 24 5.30 101< 0.160 0.700 0.960 0.004
14 30 0100 19.0 0.2 27 5.30 101< 0.420 0.900 0.660 0.003
14 30 0115 18.5 0.1 37 5.40 15 0.890 1.300 0.130 0.004
14 10 0130 18.0 4.4 69 5.40 24 1.620 2.300 0.070 1.103
73/10/26 15 00 0000 20.8 120 34 6.20 101< 0.470 0.800 0.740 0.013
15 00 0005 ‘0.8 4.4 33 6.20 11 0.480 0.600 0.750 0.010
15 00 0015 20.6 4.2 32 6.20 12 0.470 0.700 0.750 0.008
15 00 0035 20.6 3.6 34 6.10 12 0.490 0.700 0.750 0.008
15 00 0075 20.5 4.4 33 6.20 101< 0.500 0.900 0.760 0.011
15 00 0100 19.3 3.8 42 6.40 10K 0.600 3.000 0.560 0.016
15 00 0115 18.9 4.0 46 6.40 101< 0.600 3.100 0.580 0.014
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOPET ErP!FvAL r) TE 15/01/’)7
00665
DEPTH PHOS—TOT
15 30 0000
15 30 0006
15 30 0015
15 30 0030
15 30 0050
15 10 0075
15 30 0100
15 30 0120
14 10 0000
14 30 0005
14 10 0015
14 30 0030
14 30 0050
14 30 0075
14 30 0100
14 30 0115
14 10 0130
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0015
15 00 0035
15 00 0075
15 00 0100
15 00 (.115
r jC,/ p
0.018
0.015
o .0?5
C .016
0.049
0 • 1 35
0.029
0.01’.
0.008
0 .0Oi
0.010
0.016
0.0u
0.012
0.01
0.03B
0.017
0.013
0.010
0.008
0.0 11
0.060
0.190
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
370404
35 26 32.0 083 33 19.U
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NO9TH CAROLINA
211 12u2
0145 FEET DEPTH
TIME
OF
DAY FEET
1 IEPALES
3
3.5
DATE
F OM
TO
7 3/0 6/0 2
73/08/21
73/ 10/26
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370405
35 24 47.0 083 33 29.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0159 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N021N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L HG/L MG/L MG,L P
73/06/03 09 00 0000 22.8 30 50K 8.20 10K 0.070 0.300 0.170 0.005
09 00 0006 21.4 10.0 50K 8.10 10K 0.070 0.200k 0.170 0.005
09 00 0015 17.4 7.8 50K 7.70 10K 0.150 0.200K 0.280 0.108
09 00 0030 16.6 8.0 50K 7.40 10K 0.170 0.200K 0.290 0.009
09 00 0050 15.2 8.2 50K 7.30 10 0.130 0.200K 0.220 0.010
09 00 0075 13.8 8.6 50K 7.20 10K 0.110 0.500 0.190 0.008
09 00 0100 12.1 9.0 50K 7.20 10K 0.060 0.400 0.120 0.007
09 00 0125 10.5 9.0 50K 7.10 10K 0.060 0.400 0.160 0.007
09 00 0155 9.8 8.0 50K 7.00 10K 0.070 0.500 0.210 0.007
73/08/21 14 05 0000 27.4 84 26 7.30 13 0.170 1.000 0.180 0.011
14 OS 0005 27.2 8.0 27 6.90 11 0.130 0.600 0.180 0.110
14 05 0015 24.5 6.0 27 6.20 13 0.120 0.300 0.240 0.016
14 05 0030 23.8 5.8 27 5.90 14 0.120 0.500 0.250 0.012
14 05 0050 22.3 6.6 25 5.80 14 0.080 0.400 0.120 0.001
14 05 0075 20.4 6.6 24 5.80 15 0.150 0.300 0.160 0.005
14 05 0100 19.0 7.2 22 5.60 14 0.080 0.400 0.080 0.007
14 05 0125 17.8 2.2 28 5.40 16 0.200 0.500 0.180 0.106
73/10/26 16 15 0000 21.3 156 24 6.60 10K 0.160 0.400 0.410 0.088
16 15 0010 20.7 6.2 24 6.60 10K 0.140 0.400 0.400 0.008
16 15 0025 20.7 5.8 24 6.40 10K 0.140 0.400 0.410 8.808
16 15 0050 20.6 6.0 24 6.40 10K 0.130 0.300 0.350 0.104
16 IS 0090 20.5 6.0 24 6.50 10K 0.120 0.400 0.290 0.0 6
16 15 0108 19.8 6.0 25 6.50 10K 0.120 0.400 0.220 0.005
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOi ET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
DATE
FROM
TO
00 65 3?? 17
DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLPPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
37( L4Ø5
3 4 47.0 ‘) 3 33 29.0
FON AN LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
HEPALES 2111202
0159 FEET DEPTH
73/06/03 09 00 0000
09 00 000
09 00 0015
09 00 0030
09 00 0050
09 00 0075
09 00 0100
09 00 0125
09 00 0155
73/08/21 14 05 0000
14 05 0005
14 05 0015
14 05 0030
14 05 0050
14 05 0075
14 05 0100
14 05 0125
73/10/26 16 15 0000
16 15 0010
16 15 0025
16 15 0050
16 15 0090
16 15 0108
0.030
0.030
0.077
0.079
0.082
0.040
0.01
0.064
0.0 12
0.011
0.0 17
.013
0.011
0.011
0.015
0.0 34
0.010
0.010
).010
0.007
0.030
0.0 33
TIME
OF
DAY FEET
-3
3.6
6.0
2.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370406
35 22 52.0 083 33 17.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0112 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRAP4SP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL P4021 1403 PHOS—OIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N P4-TOTAL. ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT M6/L INCHES MICRO$HO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L NGJL P
73/06/03 10 00 0000 21.5 12 50K 7.00 13 0.080 0.290K 0.240 0.009
10 00 0006 19.9 8.5 50K 7.00 12 0.080 0.20 0K 0.220- 0.007
10 00 0015 18.2 8.4 50K 6.90 12 0.080 0.200K 0.230 0.011
10 00 0030 16.5 6.4 50K 6.90 12 0.090 0.200K 0.250 0.008
10 00 0050 15.3 8.6 50K 6.90 12 0.090 0.200k 0.220 0.000
10 00 0070 13.7 9.0 50K 6.80 13 0.110 0.200k 0.170 0.007
10 00 0090 13.0 8.9 50K 6.80 11 0.120 0.200K 0.160 0.011
10 00 0108 11.9 7.2 50K 6.70 1) 0.140 0.200k 0.160 0.008
73/08/21 16 30 0000 27.4 68 29 7.70 12 0.070 0.600 0.110 0.004
16 30 0005 27.3 9.0 28 7.10 12 0.080 0.600 0.100 0.005
16 30 0015 25.1 7.2 25 6.50 15 0.090 0.600 1.140 0.036
16 30 0030 23.7 7.6 25 6.10 14 0.080 0.600 0.180 0.007
16 30 0050 22.5 4.8 27 5.90 14 0.140 0.600 0.260
16 30 0070 20.2 26 5.70 18 0.140 0.400 0.000 0.005
16 30 0080 19.4 3.6 30 5.60 19 0.170 0.700 0.060 0.099
73/10/26 14 40 0000 20.7 100 22 6.60 10K 0.110 0.300 0.260 0.000
14 40 0010 20.4 6.8 22 6.60 10 0.120 0.300 0.260 0.000
14 40 0020 20.3 6.4 22 6.50 10 0.120 0.200 0.260 0.005
14 40 0050 20.1 6.6 22 6.50 lOX 0.110 0.200 0.240 0.11$
14 40 0063 16.5 7.8 22 6.60 0K 0.130 0.300 0.120 0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
(10665
DEPTH PHOS—TOT
FEET MG/L P
10 00 0000
10 00 0006
10 00 0015
10 00 0030
10 00 0050
10 00 0070
10 00 OOQO
10 00 O1OR
16 30 0000
16 30 0005
16 30 0015
16 30 0030
16 10 0051)
16 30 0070
16 30 00 0
14 40 0000
14 40 0010
14 40 0020
14 40 0050
14 40 0063
0 .052
0.051
0 .048
o .06’+
0.079
0.046
0.04
0 .043
D. O1R
0.020
0.027
0.039
0.059
0.0?5
0.039
0.010
0.011
0.011
0.014
(1.064
32217
CHLPPHYL
UG/L
370406
35 22 52.0 0R3 33 17.0
FONTANA LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
2111202
0112 FEET
TIME
OF
DAY
1 IEPALES
3
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/03
73/08/21
73/10/26
DEPTH
0.8
5.8
4.0
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/07
370407
35 21 59.0 083 33 50.0
FONTAP4A LAKE
37173 NORTH CAROLINA
1IEPALES 2111202
3 0100 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N026N03. PHOS—OlS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICRONHO SU MG/L MG/L NG/L NG L MG/L P
73/06/03 12 30 0000 23.8 24 501 7.30 10K 0.080 0.300 0.150 0.006
12 30 0006 19.9 8.0 501 7.10 10K 0.090 0.200 0.210 0.00
12 30 0015 18.0 7.6 501 6.90 10K 0.120 0.300 0.260 0.006
12 30 0030 16.6 7.6 SOL 6.90 14 0.170 0.400 0.280 0.I1
12 30 0050 15.3 8.5 501 6.00 14 0.100 0.200k 0.170- 0.007
12 30 0072 13.6 9.2 501 6.90 14 0.070 0.200K 0.120 0.006
12 30 0096 12.4 7.8 501 6.90 16 0.110 0.200K 0.160 0.007
73/08/21 16 50 0000 27.6 78 29 7.70 16 0.060 0.700 0.100 0.0 1 5
16 50 0005 27.5 9.0 29 7.30 13 0.060 0.700 0.100 0.010
16 50 0015 25.6 5.8 31 6 ,20 15 0.070 0.500 0.120 0.007
16 50 0030 24.1 5.0 28 5.90 16 0.100 0.200K 0.110 0.004
16 50 0045 22.7 6.8 24 5.00 14 0.090 0.200 0.100 0.015
16 50 0060 21.7 8.0 25 5.80 14 0.120 0.300 0.170 1.010
73/10/26 14 17 0000 21.0 105 22 6.70 11 0.130 0.400 0.260 0.009
14 17 0010 20.4 6.6 22 6.70 11 0.100 0.300 0.250 1.000
14 17 0025 20.4 6.6 23 6.70 10 0.100 0.200 0.250 0.000
14 17 0045 20.3 6.6 23 6.70 11 0.100 0.200 0.240 0.000
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET r ETR1EVAL DATE: 75/01/07
370407
35 21 59.0 0 3 33 50.0
FONTA’JA LAI E
31173 NOL Tr4 CAROLINA
2111202
0100 FEET DEPTH
00665
DEPTH HOS—TOt
FEET MC,/L
12 30 0000
1? 30 0006
17 30 0015
12 30 0030
17 30 0050
1? 30 0072
17 30 0396
16 50 0000
l 50 0005
16 50 0015
16 50 0030
16 50 O(J45
16 50 0060
14 17 0000
14 17 0010
14 17 00?5
14 17 0045
0.079
0.053
C .O9
0 • 045
0.03 3
0.043
0.014
0.01’,
0.016
0.0O’
(‘.014
0.024
0.013
0.015
0.010
0.010
T IME
OF
DAY
1 1EPALES
3
DATE
F P O i
TO
73/06/03
73/ OR/?1
73/i 0/26
3?21 7
C HL PP H V L
A
IJG/L
6.1
5.1
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARy and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORI T RETRiEVAL DATE 75/01/20
3704A1 LSJ7 O4A I
35 27 00.0 083 49 00.0
LITTLE TENNESSEE
37 7.5 FONTANA DAM
0/FONTANA LAKE
300 FT ABOVE HWY 28
1 1EPALES
4
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
BROG BELO DAM
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
73/03/25
11
30
0.470
0.270
0.154
0.011
0.011
71/04/2I
10
55
0.420
0.110
0.012
0.005K
0.010
73/05/27
13
00
0.530
0.100K
0.025
0.00 5K
0.030
73/07/01
12
15
0.410
0.260
0.019
0.008
0.010
73/07/29
11
15
0.560
1.470
0.087
0.011
0.025
73/08/19
12
30
0.5?0
1.900
0.126
0.005K
0.020
73/10/13
11
05
0.510
2.510
0.036
0.008
0.008
73/11/11
10
30
0.510
1.700
0.240
0.005K
0.005K
73/12/09
1?
00
0.580
0.140
0.009
74/01/06
18
00
0.620
0.625
0.128
0.008
0.037
74/01/20
13
00
0.470
0.900
0.124
0.008
0.020
74/02/10
13
00
0.410
0.700
0.075
0.005
0.020
74/02/24
13
00
0.320
0.900
0.075
0.005K
0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
cTo° I T T V L Er ii
3/0 4A? LS3P.4A?
35 17 00.0 083 ?- 3-.O
LITTLE tE *1ES EE flVEe
37 fr14 Mt CON C )
I /FONTANA
tj I) ; 1 MI NE SrIL S .SW JCT WITH -4 Y 2
1IEPALES 2111204
4 000 FEET DEPT 4
u 1O 00671 00665
! TE T1 F 1WPTH r O2 MlJ 1(11 ,KJ L P-i —N PHOS—DIS PHOS—IOT
POM OF i—T’jTAL TOTAL 0 Tr O
TO ‘ AY Fi E I Mr,/L i /L MG/L P i&/L P
73/’Y 4/2S 11 ‘. ,.lT ‘.?? O o.0?3 9.007 0.040
71/04/? 1 50 1.1 7 C.?2U j.0l4 0.011 0. OS O
71/r’ 5/27 j ç5 .11i C. J0 .03] 0e009 0.030
71/ ’7/0l 11 10 .1 ‘.3 10 0.046 0.013 0.045
7 /fl7/2() 10 S fl.’ 00 0.044 0.016
71/O /t° 10 () ;.‘h’ 0.154 0.013 0.19
7 /1flh13 17 .5 “.C 0.300 0.021 0.017 0.055
71/11/1.’ 19 5 ‘j. ’u 0.076 0.03? 0.055
7l/l?/O 1) 20 u.30 i ‘,.)2 0.016 0.060
7’ /01/0 ii ( • 2 Cj ‘ . 1U ).040 0.008 0.070
74/0l/?U ii lc 0.700 3.036 0.01? 0.035
7L./e?/1o 11 ,.2)) 0. ’30 0.035 0.010 0.06 5
74/) /2’. l I) .1 ( .300 ).0 0 0.005 0.075
-------
STOPET FT 1FVAL DATI 7 /iI/13
31 )4’ 1 L ’3T04 -U 1
3 2 00.0 0 3 ?5 00.0
TUCKASEIGEE e1VE
37 MAP S ALN Co
1/FONTANA LAKF
I-NY 19 I3RDG JUST E OF HkYSON CITY
1IEPALES 21 )1204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
flC 1 0062S 0) ,10 00671 00665
OATF TIMF DE’ TH NO NO3 T’)T KJEL N-u-N PHOS—DIS PFIOs—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET iG/L i ( /L. MG/L M(/L ° M(/L P
73/03/25 17 1.0 0.17 1. 50 u.850 0.005K 0.020
71/O4/2 ? 17 20 ).1 3O 1.30) u.950 0.005K 0.020
73/05/27 14 15 0.1 ’. ‘.lfl) 1.370 0.010 0.025
71/07/01 12 50 c ’.13-? 1.3 Q 1.090 0.005K 0.035
71/07/2?Q 12 iS C.?6J 3.150 2.E00 0.006 0.055
73/3 /)0 I? 30 “.I’ H 7.940 2.400 0.005K 0.0R5
73/10/1? 1 30 J.1? 4.?e0 3. 00 0.010 0.030
73/11/tO 14’S ‘).1” 5.040 0.012 0.025
71/12/08 17 40 C.? 4 0.450 O. O OH 0.020
76/01/05 11 00 C.7c.) 0.7O i 0.?64 0.005K 0.050
74/01/20 1 iS 0.?0I) 0. 00 0.594 0.005K 0.015
74/02/0’) 14 25 (‘.16 ’ ) 0.500 0.39,1 0.005K 0.020
74/0’/?4 14 IS ‘ ).1 8 0. ’ 00 0.390 0.005K 0.040
K VALUE c lcj iri r -
LESS Tti. N I IC. 1L
-------
5T9 0 ET ?ET ?TFvaI 1)ñT 7—./ j/j3
J7t 4C1 L53704C3
3 dJ 30.0 0? 3 31 00.u
ALAI? (A CREEK
i7 7.5 NOLAND CP
T/FONTANA LAKE
M I) 1309 I-4R06 7 M I WS* OF -3MYSO J C1T
1 1EPALES 111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
C O6H I 00671 00665
DATE T1’ F 1)F T-I Nc7 .r o:3 TOT JEL ri3—N P -IflS-DIS ‘- ‘HOS—TOT
FROM OF •j—FI TAL “I TOTAL (JRTrI(J
TO flAY FEET M( /L 1( /L M(3/L M(/L P MG/L ‘
71/03/25 I’ IS .17’ 0.2?S 0.029 0.005K 0.020
73/94/2 i 16 50 ‘.IlS 3.l o 9.021 0.006
71.’05/27 13 no O .1 - 0 0.O1S 0.005K 0.03 ’ .
71/37/01 10 35 ‘ .1I5 0.210 0 . )4R 0.005K 0.025
71/07/20 10 35 ‘.140 0. ou u.036 0.005K 0.035
71/OH/LQ 03 45 ‘.S@ i .?10 0.00 5K 0.06o
71/10/11 17 90 ‘.04’ 0. 50 0.lb 0.0 10 0.020
71/11/10 17 () 0.076 3.400 0.056 0.00 0.015
71/17/0 11 Sn fl.?l’ u.l)) 0.024 0.0’JR 0.020
74/01/05 17 25 u.’ ) .o? 0.005K 0.030
74/01/20 10 10 :s. 00 .3o3 0.02’5 0.012 0.015
74/fl2/3Q )3 9 ‘j.l5 0.100 0.025 3.005 0.020
7Li/’?/2 .. II CS .1- 7 J.’ 0(• ).0’+0 0.005K 0.03 5
1< V L(IE O’ TO -3_
LESS IH, N 1’JL)IC-.IC_J
-------
ST0 ET ETR1FVAL DATE 7-/’)1/13
3704D1 LS37 O4D1
35 20 00.0 0P3 35 jO.O
NANTAP-IALA RIVER
3T MAP S A1N CO
T/FONTANA LAKtE
I) 1180 dRDG JUST
1 1EPALES
4
DATF
FROM
TO
71/01/25
73/04/29
73/05/27
71/07/01
73/0 7/2Q
73/(1 / 14
71/10/12
71/1 1/10
71/1 7/OH
74/0 1/05
74/01/20
74/02/09
74 /02/2
TP4E DEPT -I
DAY FE T
11 (10
16 75
11 10
11
11 75
11 00
1 00
1? 20
11 (P
11 30
1? 2?
11 00
N JCT WITH HWY 19
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
d 630
NO 7 NO 3
N — TOTAL
M6/L
0.045
0.0 37
0.015
0 .02
0.027
0.323
J .01.3
0.036
0.036
0.084
0.056
0.060
0.056
0062
TOT KJFL
N
MG/L
o • 100K
0.210
0.690
0 • 100k
0 • 220
3.100
0.1 0 0K
U • 300
0.100K
1.100
0.400
0.100K
0.100K
00610
N H3-N
TOTAL
0.008
0.046
0.022
0.039
0.024
0.115
0.023
0.028
0.008
0.076
0 • 028
0.010
0.0 15
00671
PHOS—DIS
OPT HO
HG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
o .ooe
0.006
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS—TOT
MG/L P
0.0 10
0.0 10
0.0 10
0.0 10
0.015
0.0 10
0.006
0.010
0.010
0.0 15
0.005
0.005
0.0 20
K VALUE ‘(NO N ru b .
LESS THAN 1’lJlcArED
-------
ST’)c ET ET TFVA, DAT ’ - 75/ 1/13
7u4E1 LS3/. , eF1
35 . ‘+ 00.0 01 3 37 30.)
p- A’jTr1E CREEK
37 MAP (IRAHAM Cu
T/FONTAr’JA LAKE
i Y 8 BP UG 6.5 Ml W JLT ‘IjJr qy
11E ’ ALES 211I ?04
0000 FEET DE TM
C f-3 ’ • 0’?5 0rf’ l O 00o71 00665
‘)ATE TIMF DFDT1 NO7? NO3 T nT KJEL Nrfl-N PrIOSOIS P1-105—TOT
EPOM OF \‘—TnT L TOTAL U
-------
STOPET RETfUEVAL DATE 7 /01/13
3704F1 LS370 +F1
35 24 00.0 083 40 30.0
STECOAH CREEK
37 7.5 TUSPcEE(,EE
T/FONTANA LAKE
RD 1236 BROG 3 MI NNE OF STECOAH
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET OE”TH
00610 006?5 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPT’l NO?F 1 N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS Pi-IOS—TOT
FROM OF ‘J—TOTAL N TOTAL OPT -1O
TO DAY FEFT MG/L MG/I MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
73/03/?S 1? 70 0.230 0.170 0.023 0.006 0.025
73/04/2 10 10 0.?1 J 0.033 0.009 0.025
73/06/27 1? 00 (.15(, 0.640 0.150 0.011 0.065
71/07/01 11 30 v.140 1.’ 80 0.079 0.010 0.030
73/07/20 10 30 0.240 0.330 0.018 0.011 0.045
73/08/19 11 30 0.? 4) 2.520 0.138 0.008 0.045
71/10/13 10 25 0.550 0.024 0.015 0.030
71/11/11 09 55 G.169 1.000 0.060 0.012 0.020
73/12/09 11 00 0.270 0.100 0.0?0 0.012 0.025
74/01/O’ 18 00 fl.3 0 0.300 0.024 0.012 0.035
74/01/20 1? 00 .330 0.2 0o 0.032 0.012 0.020
74/0?/10 1? 00 0.276 0.600 0.02? 0.010 0.030
74/0?/24 1? 00 O.?45 0.100 0.015 0.010 0.045
-------
STOQET ‘ ET t VAL DATE 75/01/13
‘ ) TE
Fpr)M
TO
73/08/0
7-1/0 ,1J
CP I T) —
71/09/13
73/10/10
CP (T) —
71/10/10
71/I 1/1
CP IT) —
73/I 1/17
73/12/
74/0 l/1 ’
CP (T) —
74/01/ 1
74/ 0?’/13
CP I T) —
74/Q _/ 11
74/03/1(4
74/ S/27
CP I T) —
74/05/27 13 00
74/C,/? ,) 10 00
CP (TI -
76/ob/2J 15 00
7L./j(/?3 08 00
CP ( T) —
7z./ a7/?3 15 00
74/Oe /2? 05 00
CP I T) —
74/3 /27 15 00
3704/A ‘37041A
35 16 45.0 1 ’ Ii 1 ,0.0
FST CA OLL’J LJNIVh- jITY
37 2 0 < J(KVLLLt-
T/FONTA’JA LAP F
COLLOW ’-iEE C ’EEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTh
P004991
0)630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
FI? IF
r)FPTH
JO? NO3
TOT I JEL
NH3-N
PHOS—DIS
“HOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
OF
“I—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGI)
DAi
FEFT
MG/L
G/L
Mç,/L
Mr,/L P
MG/L P
INST MG ’ )
MONTHLY
11 00
0.510
5.400
0.300
0.940
4.200
0. 00
0.500
08 00
l.6b 0
7.000
0.430
1. 60
2.550
16 00
10 00
1.90()
P.6 50
3.740
4.300
5.050
14 00
jq no
5.300
11.000
3.500
4.100
4.900
0.450
i 00
2.400
4.500
0.910
1.380
2.600
0.150
0.300
09 00
‘.080
7.200
3.200
4.000
5.100
0.395
0.575
14 00
09 00
?.5 00
7.900
3.000
3.36G
4.100
0.650
0.500
14 00
10 00
3.800
7. 00
2.700
3.900
5.300
0.500
0.450
Oi)
5.600
11.000
1.400
2.400
3.500
0.600
0.628
5•57)
4.400
1.500
1.312
2.550
0.600
0.628
7.800
1.400
3.200
3.900
0.600
0.628
£ .040
4.600 0.05UK 1.000
0.600 0.628
------- |