U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
MDSHWJNUNG
JEFFERSON COUNTY
WISCONSIN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•foOPO 697.O32
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE KQSHKONOUG
JEFFERSON COUNTS
WISCONSIN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
WISCONSIN NATIONAL GUARD
NOVEMBER,
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Wisconsin Study Lakes iv, v
Lake and Dralr!age Area Map vi
Sections
I Conclusions 1
If Introduction 5
ill. L Ke and [ irainage Basin Chdracteristics 6
V. Lake Wdter ç iality Summary 7
V Nutrient Loadinqs 11
VI. Literature Reviewed 17
‘J1. Appendices 18
-------
11
FOR EWO RD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national , regional, and state manaqement
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being niade to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
AC KNO WL EDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the Wisconsin
National Guard for conduct of the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
Francis H. Schraufnagel, Acting Assistant Director, and Joseph
R. Ball of the Bureau of Water Quality, and Donald R. Winter, Lake
Rehabilitation Program, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey. Central Office and District Office per-
sonnel of the Department of Natural Resources reviewed the prelim-
inary reports and provided critiques most useful in the preparation
of this Working Paper series.
Major General James J. Lison, Jr., ‘the Adjutant General of
Wisconsin, and Project Officer CW-4 Donald D. Erickson, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Wisconsin National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF WISCONSIN
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Altoona Eau Claire
Beaver Dam Barron
Beaver Dam Dodge
Big Eau Pleine Marathon
Browns Racine
Butte des Morts Winnebago
Butternut Price, Ashland
Castle Rock Flowage Juneau
Como Walworth
Crystal Vilas
Delavan Walworth
Eau Claire Eau Claire
Geneva Walworth
Grand Green Lake
Green Green Lake
Kegonsa Dane
Koshkonong Jefferson, Rock, Dane
Lac La Belle Waukesha
Middle Walworth
Na9 wicka Waukesha
Oconomowoc Waukesha
Okauchee Waukesha
Petenwell Flowage Juneau
Pewaukee Waukesha
Pigeon Waupaca
Pine Waukesha
Poygan Winnebago, Waushara
Rock Jefferson
Rome Pond Jefferson, Waukesha
Round Waupaca
Shawano Shawano
-------
V
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Sinnissippi Dodge
Swan Columbia
Tainter Dunn
Tichigan Racine
Townline Oneida
Trout Vilas
Wapogassett Polk
Wausau Marathon
Willow Oneida
Winnebago Winnebago, Fond Du Lac,
Cal umet
Wisconsin Columbia
Wissota Chippewa
Yellow Burnett
-------
LAKE
KOSHKONONG
X Lake Sampling Site
® Tributary Sampling Site
,f Direct Drainage Area
Sowaqe Treatment Facility
9 ‘9M1
Scale
idge
K
0
r’sJ
J
— WALWO TH
-------
LAKE KOSHKONONG
STORET NO. 5522
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and the records of others show Lake Koshkonong
is eutrophic. Because of the morphometry, it is likely this
lake would be considered eutrophic without cultural influences.
B. Rate—Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results and the lake data show Lake Koshkonong
was nitrogen limited at the time the assay sample was collected.
Lake data indicate nitrogen limitation during the other sampling
times as well.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
l Point sources——During the sampling year, Lake Koshkonong
received a total phosphorus load at a rate more than ten times
that proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as “dangerous”; i.e., a
eutrophic rate (see page 16). However, the combined phosphorus
loads from all of the point sources considered in the Survey
amount to only about 16% of the total load to the lake. Even if
complete removal of phosphorus were instituted at these sources,
the phosphorus loading to the lake would still be eight times the
“dangerous” rate. Therefore, it is concluded that control of
phosphorus at the indicated point sources would not appreciably
change the trophic condition of Lake Koshkonong.
-------
2
2. Non—point sources——It is noted that the per—square—mile
phosphorus contributions of the Rock River and Koshkonong Creek
are very high as compared to that of Otter Creek, which is not
impacted by any known point sources, and thus probably is repre-
sentative of areal or non-point source contributions (see page
16). It seems appropriate to give further consideration to the
sources contributing to the high export rates of the Rock River
and Koshkonong Creek.
On the basis of the information in the Department of Natural
Resources Rock River drainage reports, it is estimated that the
sewered population of the Koshkonong Creek subdrainage is 12,000
people. At 2.5 lbs/P/yr per capita, municipal sources would
account for 30,000 of the 42,420 lbs P measured in the creek at
station C-i during the sampling year. The remaining load of 12,420
lbs amounts to 74 lbs/mi 2 /yr, and thus it appears that the point-
source phosphorus contribution in the Koshkonong Creek subdrainage
are almost all municipal (the only food-industry point sources in
the subdrairiage are one cannery and one cheese plant).
In the Rock River subdrainage, it is estimated that the sew—
ered population tributary to the river upstream from station A—i
is 108,000 persons. At 2.5 lbs P/capita/yr, municipal sources
would account for 270,000 of the 869,150 lbs P measured in the
river at station A—i during the sampling year. The remaining
load of 59,650 lbs amounts to a very high 274 lbs P/mi 2 /yr or
about 200 lbs P/mi 2 more than that assumed to be attributable
-------
3
to areal sources. Thus it appears that point sources other than
municipal, possibly food—industry sources, are the more important
contributors to the Rock River subdrainage phosphorus export.
It is recognized that area] contributions will vary from
drainage to drainage and even within a drainage, depending on soil
types, slopes, crop types, etc, but it does not seem likely that
area] contributions in the Rock River drainage would be nearly four
times that attributable to the Otter Creek and Koshkonong Creek
drainages. However, to assess the possibility that such a high
area] contribution might occur, the following table was prepared.
AGRICULTURE IN THE ROCK RIVER DRAINAGE*
(Walters, et a].; 1973)
Rank Among 70 Wisconsin Counties
Commodity Dane Dodge Jefferson
Corn for grain 1 4 9
Corn for silage 1 2 21
Oats 12 4 26
Barley 43 5 42
Wheat 13 16 24
Soy beans 10 32 6
Alfalfa 2 4 30
Tobacco 2 12 9
Peas 4 3 23
Sweet corn 4 2 9
All cattle 2 4 27
Milk cows 2 3 26
Swine 2 5 1
Stock sheep 3 8 26
Chickens 2 5 1
Eggs 2 4 1
“Mean rank” 6.6 7.2 17.6
* 1972 crops; 1973 livestock.
-------
4
It can be seen that Dane and Dodge counties are about equal in
overall agricultural activity and that both markedly exceed the
activity in Jefferson County. Further, in 1969 usage of corner—
clal fertilizers (Anonymous, 1971), Dane County ranked first with
192,960 acres fertilized, and Dodge County ranked second with
163,120. Jefferson was well down the list with only 81,540 acres
fertilized.
The above information, while not conclusive, does suggest that
the areal contributions to the Rock River drainage of Dodge and
Jefferson counties should not differ too much from the areal contri-
butions to the Koshkonong Creek drainage of Dane County.
-------
5
II. INTRODUCTION
Reportedly, Lake Koshkonong, 6th largest lake in Wisconsin, was
once a marsh and was widely famed for excellent waterfowl hunting (Poff,
et al., 1968). However, the original Indian Ford Dam was rebuilt in
1917 with a higher head, and the marsh character of the lake was changed.
Now, because of lack of depth and long wind fetch, the lake is usually
very turbid during open-water periods, and shoreline erosion is said to
be a continuing problem.
Although the lake is aesthetically less pleasing than most Wisconsin
waters, recreational uses include boating, water—skiing, and fishing.
The lake is regarded as one of the better fishing lakes in Jefferson
County, and good catches of northern pike, walleyes, white bass, crappies,
channel catfish, and bullheads are said to be common. Carp are abundant
(Narf, 1974).
Public access is provided at a number of sites, and commercial facili-
ties are available.
-------
6
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry*:
1. Surface area: 10,480 acres.
2. Mean depth: 5.3 feet.
3. Maximum depth: 7 feet.
4. Volume: 55,793 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 24 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name _______________ ___________
Rock River
Otter Creek
Koshkonong Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
2. Outlet -
Rock River
C. PrecipitationTtt:
1. Year of sampling: 37.7 inches.
2. Mean annual: 30.2 inches.
* Ball, 1974.
i• Drainage areas are accurate within ±0.5%; mean daily flows are accurate
within ±40%; mean monthly flows are accurate within ±35%; and normalized
monthly flows are accurate within ±35%.
ft Includes area of lake.
ft See Working Paper No. 1, “Survey Methods”.
Drainage area
2,190.0 mi 2
44.0 m1 2
168.0 mi 2
Mean flowt
1,070.8 cfs
16.8 cfs
68.1 cfs
81.6
2,483.6
m1 2
mi 2
38.6
1,194.3
cfs
cfs
2,500.0 mi 2 tt 1,194.3 cfs
-------
7
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Koshkonong was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples
for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two stations on
the lake and from one or more depths at each station (see map, page vi).
During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near bottom to surface) sam-
ple was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and
enumeration; and during the last visit, a single five—gallon depth—integrated
sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth—integrated
sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 4 feet at station 1 and 4 feet at station 2.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the data
for the fall sampling period, when the lake was essentially well-mixed, are
summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary is based on all
val ues.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times,
refer to Appendix B.
-------
8
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
FALL VALUES
(11/10/72)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature (Cent.) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Dissolved oxygen (mg/i) 9.3 9.9 9.9 10.6
Conductivity (pmhos) 640 645 645 650
pH (units) 7.8 7.9 7.9 8.0
Alkalinity (mg/i) 244 247 247 250
Total P (mg/i) 0.186 0.188 0.188 0.191
Dissolved P (mg/i) 0.157 0.157 0.157 0.157
NO + NO (mg/i) 1.060 1.080 1.080 1.100
Am onia mg/l) 0.100 0.105 0.105 0.110
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches) 10 19 14 33
-------
9
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Number
Date Genera per ml
06/22/72 1. Cyclotella 8,018
2. Melosjra 4,234
3. Scenedesmus 2,793
4. Synedra 1 ,892
5. Merismopedia 1,441
Other genera 7,928
Total 26,306
08/17/72 1. Melosira 35,818
2. Cyclotella 9,273
3. Scenedesmus 3,454
4. Anabaena 2,545
5. Navicula 2,182
Other genera 4,364
Total 57,636
11/10/72 1. Stichococcus 2,151
2. Flagellates 1,736
3. Anabaena 566
4. Melosira 528
5. Cyclotella 453
Other genera 3,056
Total 8,490
-------
10
2. Chlorophyll a —
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20
percent.)
Sampling
Date
Station
Number
Chlorophyll a
(uQ/l)
06/22/ 62
08/1 7/72
11/10/72
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked —
Spike (mg/i )
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
01
02
01
02
01
02
64.9
78.9
24.9
21 .5
9.3
17.6
Control
0.006
0.012
0.024
0.060
0.060
10.0 N
P
P
P
P
P + 10.0 N
0.100
1.220
29,7
0.106
1.220
30.4
0.112
1.220
30.2
0.124
1.220
31.0
0.160
1.220
30.8
0.160
0.100
11.220
11.220
65.1
51.6
2. Discussion —
The control yieid of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri—
cornutum , indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Lake Koshkonong was very high at the time the sample was
taken.
The assay results also Indicate the lake was nitrogen
limited when sampled. Note the lack of significant changes
in yield with increased levels of orthophosphorus until
-------
11
nitrogen was also added. Note also the marked increase In
yield when only nitrogen was added.
The lake data indicate the lake was nitrogen limited at
the other sampling times as well (N/P ratios were 3/1 or
less, and nitrogen limitation would be expected).
D. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and the records of others show that Lake Kosh—
konong is very eutrophic; and algal blooms and dense beds of
aquatic vegetation are said to be comon (Poff, et al., 1968).
Of the 46 Wisconsin lakes studied, 41 had less mean total
phosphorus, 41 had less mean inorganic nitrogen, 37 had less mean
chlorophyll a, and none had a higher algal assay control yield.
The morphometry of Lake Koshkonong suggests that this lake
would be considered eutrophic even if cultural influences were
absent.
-------
12
V. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Wisconsin National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tribu-
tary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the high runoff months
of April and May when two samples were collected at most of the sites.
Sampling was begun in September, 1972, and was completed in August, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by the Wis-
consin District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary
sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings 0 Nutrient loadings for unsampled
“minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S) were esti-
mated by using the nutrient loads of Otter Creek, in lbs/mi 2 /year, and
multiplying by the ZZ area in mi 2 .
The operators of the Fort Atkinson, Jefferson, and Cambridge waste-
water treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding
flow data. The communities of Lake rilils and Johnson Creek declined
participation in the Survey, and nutrient loads from those sources were
estimated at 2.5 lbs P and 7.5 lbs N/capita/year.
-------
13
*1970 Census.
** Estimated at 100 gal/capita/day.
The City of Whitewater was initially omitted from the Survey through
an oversight. However, the City is about 18 stream miles from the lake
and within the limits of the Survey. On the other hand, the City of
Watertown lies just outside the 25-mile limit of the Survey (Ca. 28 stream
miles) but is now included because size of the community and possible
impact on Lake Koshkonong. Nutrient loads for both cities were estimated
at 2.5 lbs P and 7.5 lbs N/capita/year.
In the following loading tables, the loads attributed to the tribu-
taries do not include municipal loads.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Cawibri dge
Fort
Atkinson
Jefferson
Lake Mills
Johnson
Creek
Watertown
Whi tewater
Pop.
Served*
689
9,164
5,429
3,556
790
15,683
12,038
Mean
Flow (mgd )
0.108
1 .850
1 .358
0.356**
0.079**
1 .568**
1 .204”
Treatment
Stab, pond
Act, sludge
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter &
act. sludge
Receiving
Water
Koshkonong Creek
Rock River
Rock River
Crawfish River
Johnson Creek
Rock River
Whitewater Creek
-------
14
2. Known industiral* — Several food-processing plants are
located within the Lake Koshkonong drainage basin. How-
ever, because of the constraints of the Survey**, these
sources were not evaluated directly (see discussion,
page 2).
* NicKersie, et al., 1968; 1971.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
15
lbsP/ %of
_______ total
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) - 6,040
c. Known municipal —
Fort Atkinson
Jefferson
Watertown
Whi tewater
Cambri dge
Lake Mills
Johnson Creek
d. Septic tanks* - 250
e. Industrial — ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,630
* Estimated 400 unsewered dwellings on lakeshore; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
Source
a. Tributaries (non—point load) -
Rock River
Otter Creek
Koshkonong Creek
yr
723,190
3,270
40,770
36,210
29,570
39,210
30,100
1 ,650
8,890
1 ,980
78.4
0.4
4.4
0.7
3.9
3.2
4.2
3.3
0.2
0.9
0.2
<0. 1
0.2
Total 922,760 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet — Rock River 728,790
3. Net annual P accumulation — 193,970 pounds
-------
16
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
lbs N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non—point load) —
Rock River 5,404,240 80.0
Otter Creek 78,650 1.2
Koshkonong Creek 629,490 9.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) — 145,900 2.2
c. Known municipal —
Fort Atkinson 108,330 1.6
Jefferson 38,100 0.6
Watertown 117,620 1.7
Whitewater 90,280 1.3
Cambridge 2,420 <0.1
Lake Mills 26,670 0.4
Johnson Creek 5,920 <0.1
d. Septic tanks* — 9,500 0.1
e. Industrial — ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 100,960 1.5
Total 6,758,080 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet — Rock River 6,167,370
3. Net annual N accumulation — 590,710 pounds
* Estimated 400 unsewered dwellings on lakeshore; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
17
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary Ibs P/mi2/yr Ibs N/mi2/yr
Rock River 330 2,468
Otter Creek 74 1,788
Koshkonong Creek 243 3,747
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the
receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "permissible" rate is that which would result in the
*
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units
Ibs/acre/yr
grams/m /yr
Total
88.1
9.87
Accumulated
18.5
2.07
Total
644.9
72.3
Accumulated
56.4
6.3
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Koshkonong:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.96
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.48
-------
18
VI. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Wisconsin county summaries. 1969 United States
census of agriculture. Wisc. Statistical Reporting Serv., Madison.
Anonymous, 1972. Wisconsin lakes. Pubi. 218—72, Dept. of Natural
Resources, Madison.
Ball Joseph, 1974. Personal comunicatjon (morphometry of Koshkonong
Lake). Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Fitzgerald, George P., 1972. Correlations between algal assays and
chemical analysis to evaluate the effects of wastewater phosphorus
on receiving waters. EPA Project Report (Grant 16010 EHR), U. of
Wisc. Water Res. Ctr., Madison.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul 0. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in the
United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Ser., Proj. 16010 EHR.
McKersie, Jerome, George Hansel, Floyd Stautz, and Dick Narf; 1969.
Report on an investigation of the pollution in the uppper Rock
River drainage basin made during 1967-68. Dept. of Natural
Resources, Madison.
____________ Robert M. Krill, Floyd F. Stautz, Thomas Kroehn, and
Richard Narf; 1971. Lower Rock River pollution investigation
survey. Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Narf, Richard P., 1974. DNR intra—department memorandum (review of
preliminary report on Lake Koshkonong). Dept. of Natural Resources,
Madison.
Poff, Ronald J., Ronald Peining, and C. W. Threinen; 1968. Surface
water sources of Jefferson County, Dept. of Natural Resources,
Madison.
Vollenweider, Richard A., (in press). Input—output models. Schweiz.
A. Hydrol.
Walters, H. M 0 , R. E. Schooley, R. L. Sitzman, M. A. Anderson, L. E.
Krahn, and Marvin Heiser; 1973. Wisconsin agricultural statistics.
Wisc. Statistical Reporting Serv., Madison.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN
9/30/74
,- E CODE S522
LAKE KOSHKONONG
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAP E 2500.00
TOTAL FLOW IN 14330.19
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 14330.88
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY FLOW
9 72 2100.00
10 72 2900.00
11 72 2500.00
12 72 960.00
1 73 2200.00
73 2600.00
3 73 5000.00
4 73 4800.00
5 73 5900.00
6 73 3200.00
7 73 700.00
8 73 530.00
9 72 2300.00
10 72 3300.00
11 72 2900.00
12 72 1100.00
1 73 2400.00
2 73 2900.00
3 73 5600.00
4 73 5500.00
5 73 6800.00
6 73 3700.00
7 73 830.00
8 73 630.00
24 3100.00
20 2400.00
30 1100.00
27 650.00
29 2500.00
26 1500.00
23 5800.00
13 3700.00
15 6300.00
-29 1300.00
30 500.00
25 600.00
24 3400.00
20 2700.00
30 2000.00
27 760.00
29 2800.00
26 1800.00
23 6400.00
13 4200.00
15 7200.00
29 1500.00
30 600.00
25 720.00
29 6000.00
28 5000.00
29 6900.00
28 5800.00
SUR-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
5522A I
5 522A2
552281
5522C I
5522ZZ
2190.00
2500.00
44 • 00
168.00
98.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
770.00
874.60
6.50
33.00
17.00
880.00
96J .20
8.20
41.00
22.00
2300.00
2499.00
65.00
220.00
140.00
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JUN .JUL AUG
2600.00
2854.60
60.00
220.00
130.00
920.00
1057.30
9.40
46.00
24 • 00
690.00
788.20
6.60
32.00
17.00
1400.00
1537.90
20.00
90.00
46.00
2500.00
2500.00
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS z
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
590.00
672.80
4.60
24 • 00
12.00
590.00
672.80
4.60
24 • 00
12.00
SUMMARY
670.00
768.90
4.90
26.00
13.00
770.00
874.70
6.50
33.00
17.00
670.00
768.90
4.90
27.00
13.00
1070.77
1i9 .29
16.80
68.08
38 • 64
5522A1
5522*2
-------
TPIB(JTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR ISCON5IN
9/30/74
LA (E CODE 55?? LAtSE KOSHKONOWG
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
552?Bl 9 72 110.00 24 310.00
10 72 90.00 20 50.00
11 72 56.00 30 8.80
12 72 13.00 27 4.80
1 73 130.00 29 150.00
2 73 130.00 26 14.00
3 73 240.00 23 260.00
4 73 110.00 13 86.00 29 140.00
5 73 140.00 15 150.00 28 120.00
6 73 32.00 29 13.00
7 73 6.60 30 4.60
8 73 4.00 25 4.50
55??C1 9 72 300.00 24 680,00
10 7? 300.00 20 190.00
ii 7 210.00 30 65.00
72 56.00 27 25.00
1 73 340.00 29 400.00
2 73 370.00 26 71.00
3 73 6.0.00 23 760.00
4 73 400.00 13 310.00 29 510.00
5 73 600,00 15 530.00 28 420.00
6 73 160.00 29 62.00
7 73 33.00 30 ?4.00
8 73 21.00 25 25.00
5 52?Z7 9 7’ 200.00 24 490.00
10 7? 180.00 20 110.00
11 72 120.00 30 29.00
12 72 31.00 27 13.00
1 73 230.00 29 270.00
2 73 250.00 26 37.00
3 73 460.00 23 450.00
4 73 240.00 13 190.00 29 300.00
5 73 300.00 15 320.00 28 250.00
6 73 83.00 29 33.00
7 73 17.00 30 12.00
8 73 11.00 25 12.00
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
552201
4? 53 18.0 088 55 06.0
KOSHKONONG LAKE
55 WISCONSIN
1 IEPAIES
3
2111202
0002 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FR OW
TO
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300 00017
DO TRANSP
SECCHI
MG/I INCHES
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
00630
N02&N03
P4—TOTAL
HG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
HG/I
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12/06/22 13 05 0000
72/08/17 18 45 0000
18 45 0004
72/11/10 15 00 0000
00400 00410
PH TALK
CACO3
SU MG/L
00665 00666
PHOS-TOT PHOS-DIS
HG/L P HG/I P
DATE
FROM
TO
72/06/22
7 2/ 08/17
72/11/10
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 05 0000
18 45 0000
15 00 0000
21.3
9.3
14
550
8.40
265
0.160
0.110
0.427
0.248
13
580
7.80
242
1.240
0.180
0.333
0.209
26.2
6.1
595
7.80
244
1.260
0.180
0.390
0.222
7.5
9.3
33
650
7.80
250
1.060
0.100
0.186
0.157
32217
CHLRPH YL
A
64.QJ
24.4J
9. 3J
J ALUF I(NOWN TO BE I”J ERRO’
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
552202
42 52 12.0 088 58 18.0
KOSHKOWONG LAt
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOREI PET’ 1FVAL DATE 7’/13/02
c 5 2241 L 552?A1
-.2 54 00.0 0 5-. 00.1)
‘ C< IVE
55 1 FT ATKINSON
I/L. E KOSHKONO JC,
F’?mi r LACpc.ia’qK ISL - U SW OFFT ATKINSON
11 PALFS 2111204
0000 FEET DFPT
00530 00 ’2 00610 flt)67 1 00665
DATF TIME DEPT-I NO2f NO3 TOT KJ L N-Il—N PrOS—flI PHOS —P)T
“1—TOTAL TOTAL O T9O
TO DAY FFET W/L MG/L i1,/I M(/L MG/L
7 /09/24 11 50 0.290 7.603 3. 172 0.300 0.5 0
7?/I0/20 1? 30 0.470 1.350 0.100 0.220 0.305
7?/1L/30 10 35 l.6?U 1.600 0.160 0.210 0.273
7711?/?7 II 40 1.473 1.470 0.390 0.7 0 0.360
73/0)/?O 1? ‘0 i.eoo 1. ’) 0.370 0.231 0.30)
73/02/26 10 75 1.700 2.600 0.320 0.230 0.310
73/04/13 10 30 0.520 0.690 0.015 0.017 0.017
7 7/05/? 10 30 0.5 0 1.RlS 0.126 0.220 0.320
71/06/29 11 OM 0.037 1.470 0.02? 0.190 0.420
71/07/36 15 00 0.120 2.400 0.010 0.240 v.460
71/0F3/?S 10 10 O.5’.0 ?.5’O 0.176 0.350 0.610
-------
ST ET RFT 1FVAL DATE 74/10/02
S6?24? LS55?2A2
4? 50 00.0 0R9 01 30.0
ROCK RIVEQ
55 iS STOUC.HTON
0/LAIcE )SHi ONONG
ST HWY 50 4s.U)( , AT NEWVILLE
I IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00f 30 006?S 00 10 00fi71 O06 ,5
1J T LIME DEPTH NO2 .N03 TOT KJ L NH3-N PHOS—U)IS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O,?TkO
TO DAY FEET ‘iG/L ‘IG/L Mr,/L Mr,/L M( /L P
7?/0 / 4 10 15 0.6 7 1.’ 0O 0.204 0.210 0.300
7?/I0/?0 11 15 0.3 0 ?.050 0.110 0.170 0.?A0
72/11/30 10 00 L.060 1. 40 0.044 0.13? 0.17
72/12/27 11 10 1.5 i0 1.500 0.180 0.180 0.240
73/01/29 10 35 1.9?) 1.700 0.280 0.180 0.270
7,/0 /? 09 40 1.400 1. (’00 0.0R’ 0.1 0 0.200
73/03/?3 09 ‘0 1.3 ) J.R00 0.040 0.078 .2l5
7,/0 /13 09 45 0.210 i.P0’) 0.012 0.025 0.170
71/04/2° 14 15 0.350 2.310 0.040 0.021 0.150
73/05/1, 13 40 0.430 1.400 0.019 0.110 0.210
73/05/28 OQ 30 .240 1,890 0.054 0.105 3.270
73/015/20 10 37 0.010K 2.400 0.017 0.250 0.51 5
73/07/30 14 05 0.017 1.980 0.037 0.230 0.430
71/oM/?c 09 30 0.060 1.S0O 0.189 0.1(0 0.575
K VLL(JF P’NO N TO P LE S
T’i. N INDIC TF1)
-------
ST3PET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
552?A3 LS55?2A3
4? 56 00.0 0 8 49 00.0
POCK P1VE
55 15 FT ATKINSON
I/LAKE KOSHKONONG
ST HwY 106 BROG ABOV FT ATKINSON STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DFPTH NO? NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N Pt-IOS—PIS PHOS—TOT
FI OM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I. M(/L P M(/L P
7?/09/ 4 11 05 0.155 1.050 0.190 0.’71 0.390
7?/IO/?0 13 00 0.430 1.650 0.090 0.?20 0.300
72/11/30 10 55 1.4&0 1.f 00 0.110 0.200 0.273
7?/1?/27 17 15 1.900 1.6 0 0. 00 0.280 0.350
73/01/29 1? 10 1.660 1.890 0.360 0.230 0.300
73/02/26 10 40 1.500 1.680 0.?O0 0.190 0.250
7 /03/2.3 10 15 0.5S5 1.760 0.028 0.038 0.1 2
71/04/13 10 50 0.550 1. 40 0.013 0.044 0.180
73/04/29 14 50 0.240 2.200 0.058 0.140
73/0 ,/15 14 40 0.380 1.320 0.034 0.154 0.260
73/05/2 tO 10 0.600 3.100 0.115 0.220 0.400
71/06/29 09 15 0.084 1.400 0.026 0.? Of) 0.460
73/07/30 15 75 0.010K P.000 0.023 0.? 0 0.510
71/08/2c 10 10 0.440 ?.700 0.230 0.590 0.640
K VALUE NO IN TO 8E LESS
T-iAN I ’DICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5522A4 LSS52?A4
43 00 00.0 088 49 30.0
r OCK RIVER
55 15 FT ATKINSON
I/LAKE PcOSHXONONG
ST HWY 89—26 BPDG ABOVE JEFFERSON SIP
I1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00 .10 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO? NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM O N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPIHO
TO DAY FFET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/23 10 45 0.960 2.550 0.189 0.240 0.399
72/10/2’ 1 55 0.4?0 1.615 0.058 0.210 0.300
7?/I1/26 16 40 1.200 1.7 20 0.089 0.180 0.240
72/12/16 14 00 2.040 1.800 0.?5? 0.320 0.410
7, 101/23 15 25 ?.140 1.990 0.460 0.26C 0.360
71/02/11 1 23 1.500 0.160 0.160 0.160 0.220
71/03/19 09 45 1.240 1.390 0.094 0.098 0.197
73/04/06 1? 55 0.720 1.600 0.022 0.065 0.170
71/04/26 07 45 0.400 0.170 0.140 0.400
73/05/06 16 55 0.860 2.500 0.076 0.154 0.260
73/05/25 14 10 0.350 0.096 0.220 0.375
71/06/1’, 13 04 0.240 ‘3.?0Cl 0.105 0.360
73/07/30 0.110 ?.flO O 0.046 0.290 0.525
73/08/26 1? 30 0.?40 ‘.900 0.273 0.357 0.525
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5522A5 L 55522A5
43 00 30.0 0P, 4 49 00.0
kOCK RiVER
55 1 5 u1ATERLOO
I/LAI E K )SHKONONG
1ST r DG 4BOV US 18
1 1EPALES
£4
UROG BELO STP
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
N93—N
PHOS-DIS
PHOS—TOT
FP OM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FFET
MG/I
MG/L
MG/I
MG/I P
MG/L P
72/09/?3
10
50
0.901
2.150
0.202
0.240
0. 90
72/10/27
12
05
0.336
1.540
0.070
0.210
0.300
72/11/2 ’ ,
16
30
1.060
1.540
0. 1 )95
0.2)0
0.260
72/12/16
14
10
2.100
?.700
0.?70
0.315
0.400
73/01/23
15
13
1.640
1.600
0.340
O. IQO
0.260
73/02/11
16
17
1.520
1.600
0.16R
0.180
0.230
71/03/1
09
50
1.060
2.200
0.120
0.08?
0.170
73/04/06
13
10
0.130
?.R00
0.120
0.060
0.180
73/04/26
07
20
0.08’.
1.6 0
0.115
0.112
0.240
73/05/04
17
00
0.410
2.000
0.06
0.147
0.230
73/05/25
14
25
0.310
1.800
0.092
0.231
0.370
73/06/16
12
45
0.?40
?.500
0.190
0.390
0.510
73/07/30
0.039
2.100
0.05
0.260
0.460
71/08/26
12
77
0.140
2.700
0.510
0.460
0.590
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
552246 LS5522A6
43 04 30.0 088 47 30.0
kOC ( RIVER
55 15 wArERLoo
1/LAKE KOSHKONONG
Co HWY B BRDO PELOW
1 1E ALES
4
JO9NSONCREEK STP
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
006?5
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO?&N03
TOT KJEI
NH3-N
Pt-40S-DIS
PHOS-TOT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MC./L P
MG/L P
7?/09/23
11
15
0.873
1.750
0.235
0.260
0.357
7?/1O/2?
1
30
0.336
1.600
0.120
0.190
0.290
7?”U/26
l
09
1.100
1.’,80
0.083
0.170
0.230
7?/12/1’S
14
45
2.140
l.6A0
0.240
0.240
0.320
73/01/?3
15
55
1.540
j . oo
0.360
0.200
0.270
73/02/11
16
00
1.520
2.000
0.340
0.170
0.230
73/03/1
10
10
1.040
1.680
0.075
0.07
0.152
73/04/06
13
45
0.091
1.320
0.019
0.048
0.135
73/04/26
07
05
0.073
1.500
.017
0.126
0.220
71/05/04
17
20
0.340
1.3 O
0.044
0.147
0.220
71/05/?5
14
45
O.?R0
1. 40
0.080
0.240
0.330
71/06/16
12
05
0.231
?.‘fl0
0.132
0.190
0.500
73/07/30
0.048
3.150
0.013
0.210
0.400
71/08/26
1
1?
0.046
2.700
0.075
0.752
0.460
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
552247 LS5527A7
43 05 00.0 088 47 45.0
Poc c PIV&
55 15 WATERLOO
t/LAKE KOSH ONONG
ST HWY 30 8 Dc 1 MI
1 IEPALES
NW OF JOHNSON CREEK
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
0062
OOF ’ l O
00671
00E S
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
Nr13-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOSTOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
OPTH’)
TO
D Y
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/I P
MG/L P
72/09/fl
08
05
0.794
1.700
0.169
0.260
0.360
72/10/2?
10
45
0.340
1.770
0.240
0.190
0.290
7? I1/2’
16
00
1.020
1.400
0.110
0.210
0.270
72/12/16
13
00
2.100
1.680
0.380
0.252
0.340
73/01/23
14
30
1.5’O
1.3B0
0.340
0.200
0.270
73/02/11
15
50
1.520
1. 00
0.160
0.176
0.230
73/03/18
09
02
1.040
3.100
0.105
0.076
0.157
73/04/06
11
40
O. 0Q2
1.300
0.025
0.050
0.135
73/04/26
07
33
0.075
1.500
0.033
0.130
0.220
71/05/04
16
15
C.37M
1.300
0.180
0.160
0.710
71/05/25
13
05
0.280
1.890
0.092
0.240
0.330
71/06/16
1?
30
G.231
2.150
0.210
0.399
0.5 5
73/07/30
16
20
0.073
2.800
0.011
0.200
0.430
73/0R/2
12
00
0.140
2.100
0.390
0.470
0.590
-------
STORET RETRIE:VAL DATE 74/10/02
5522B1
42 51
OTTFR
55 15 FT ATKINSON
T/LAPcE KOSHKONONG
Co D XIMG 1 MI W OF VLG OFKOSHKONONG
IIEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
LS5522B1
00.0 0 P 57 00.0
CREEK
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO?€ NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
P lOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
‘iG/L
MG/I
MG/L D
MG/L t’
72/09/24
10
35
0.440
]. 0O
C. ORS
0.115
0.190
72/10/20
11
30
1.000
0.700
0.030
0.026
0.050
72111/30
10
15
1.200
0.710
0.013
0.O IH
0.032
72112/27
11
20
1.900
0.580
0.05?
0.01
0.036
73/01/29
10
55
1.560
0. i0
0.044
0.025
0.055
73/02/26
10
00
1.860
1.150
0.060
0.014
0.040
73/03/23
09
55
0.610
?.600
0.063
0.0)9
0.020
73/04/13
11
10
0.570
1.700
0.023
0.052
0.180
73/O4/2Q
14
25
0.450
2.600
0.110
0.046
0.0B5
73/05/15
14
10
0.320
0.740
0.019
0.052
0.085
73/05/28
09
45
0.480
1.000
0.060
0.105
0.160
73/06/29
11
31
0.820
0.880
0.029
0.094
0.150
73/07/30
14
40
1.740
0.720
0.012
0.037
0.100
71/08/25
09
45
2.200
1.150
0.078
0.058
0.090
-------
STO ?ET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5522C1 LS5522C1
42 54 00.0 059 59 00.0
KOS -IKONONG CPEEK
55 15 FT ATKINSON
1/LAKE KOSHKONONG
Ar si HWY 106 WDG AT BUSSEYVILLE
1 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 006? 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIPIF 1)EPTH NO2 .IJO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FPOM oF N—TOTAL TOTAL ORTHO
TO OAY FEET M(/L iG/L G/L MG/L P
72/09/24 10 00 1.69 ? . 50 0.140 0.231 0.350
72/10/20 11 00 1.400 1.350 ( .034 0.190 0.273
72/11/30 09 05 1.370 1.3P0 0.126 0.176 0.240
72/12/27 10 45 ‘.300 1.440 0.350 0.240 0.360
71/01/29 10 15 1.500 1.800 ).?80 0.225 0.295
7i/0?/26 09 30 2.800 1.600 0.399 0.220 0.260
71/03/23 09 25 4.800 3.10 0.189 0.129 0.220
71/04/13 09 30 3.900 1. 90 0.120 0.110 0.190
73/04/29 14 00 3.200 2.520 0.060 0.147 0.190
73/05/15 13 72 ?.600 2.000 0.049 0.150 0.270
71/05/2R 09 00 1.890 2.000 0.073 0.199 0.330
73/06/29 7.600 1.540 0.030 0.180 0.375
71/07/30 14 05 2.100 1.600 0.073 0.150 ).300
73/09/25 09 15 2.100 1.390 0.126 0.220 0.390
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5522C? L 55522c2
4 57 00.0 089 01 30.0
PcOSI-4KONONG CREEK
55 15 STOUGHTON
1/LAKE KOSHKONONG
Co HWY C 2 MI S OF ROCKDALE
11E ALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 0 06?5 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO’ NO3 TOT kJEL N-13—N PrIOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL TOTAL O THO
TO DAY FEET MG/L 1 M/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L ‘
72/09/24 09 40 1.870 .R50 0.152 0.210 0.336
72/10/20 10 45 1.760 0.950 0.04? 0.231 0.320
72/12/27 10 35 7.600 1.&B0 0.470 0.294 0.370
73/01/29 10 00 3.800 ?. 00 0.350 0.245 0.330
73/02/26 09 10 2.700 1.300 O. 70 0.280 0.330
73/03/23 09 10 5.100 2.600 0.220 0.123 0.235
73/04/13 og 15 5.200 ?.300 0.132 0.105 0.185
73/04/29 13 55 3.100 ?.R’fl 0.120 0.160 0.290
73/05/15 13 10 2.800 2.100 0.077 0.168 0.300
71/35/28 08 36 1. ?0 2.100 0.091 0.IPO 0.345
73/06/29 10 ?O 2.200 1.100 0.030 0.210 0.345
73/07/30 13 50 1.820 0.880 0.066 0.260 0.370
73/08/25 OR 50 1.900 2.300 0.126 0.280 0.490
-------
STOPET 9FTPIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
55?2C3 LS5 522C3
42 49 00.0 0 9 01 00.0
KOSt-IKONONG CRFEP(
55 1 STOUGHTON
T/LA c KOSH ONONc,
OA E CO r- 1 WY B UPPER END QOC OALE MILL PD
I1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DFPT’-I
00630 006?5 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DFPP-4 NO’cNO3 TOT (JEL N - 3-N PrIOS-1)JS PHOS—TOT
FPOM OF 1 J—T(1TAL TOTAL OPIHO
TO DAY FEET t’G/L ‘ 1G/L MG/L M(/L P MG/L
72/09/24 09 35 1.690 3.001 ’ 0.110 0.220 0.340
7?/I0/20 10 35 1.700 0.PC .0 D.057 0.?6() 0.340
72/11/30 09 10 1.16 ’) 1.(’O 0.071 0.200 0.290
72/12/27 1’) 20 2.4 ( 10 1.900 0.470 0. ?O (i.’+10
71/01/29 09 45 1.700 1.QPO C.4 , 0 0.21
71/02/26 09 00 7•7flQ ) . 90 0.470 0.200 0.290
73/01/2) 09 00 5.000 3. 500 0.?70 0.140
71/04/13 09 05 6.300 2.710 ).1M O 0.09? 0.210
71/34/? 13 45 3.200 3.300 0.154 0.147
71/05/15 13 00 2.900 1.940 1.06 6 0.1 0
71/35/2 OR 30 2.200 7. 00 0.0 6P 0.16R 0.390
73/06/29 10 05 2.500 1. 500 0.051 0.?31 a.4l0
73/07/30 13 40 2.300 0.007 0.110
71/OR/25 OR 40 1.790 2.300 .3.110 0.336 0.490
-------
ST0 ET RETRIEVAL DATE: 74/10/0?
S5 2C4 LS5522C4
43 01 30.0 0R9 00 10.0
OSHKONON
55 15 SUrJ PRAIRIE
T/LAPcE KOSHKONON&
JEFFERSON CO RD XING ABV CAPIBRIDG STP
11E°ALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 006 )0 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJE:L NHI—N P 1OS—DIS PHOS—JOT
FP0 i OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTH()
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/I. MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/24 09 35 8.075 3.450 0.120 0.240 0.410
72/10/20 12 00 1.700 0. 00 0.079 0.336 0.440
72/11/30 09 00 1.300 1.760 0.415 0.240 0.310
72/12/27 10 10 ?.600 ‘.800 .695 0.150 0.440
73/01/29 09 30 4.600 2.800 0.580 0.271 0.380
73/02/26 08 45 3.000 2.100 0.930 0.450 0.530
73/Q3/23 08 45 5.600 ?.ena 0.?70 0.160 0.210
73/04/14 08 45 7.400 3.000 0.176 0.105 0.230
73/04/29 13 40 3.800 p.7 30 0.l 0 0.19P 0.2R5
73/05/15 1? 45 3.300 ?.?0O 0.115 0.180 0.313
73/05/28 08 15 p.800 7.800 0.085 0.176 0.390
73/06/29 09 54 2.700 .3R0 0.042 0.330 0.450
73/07/30 13 30 2.500 1.680 0.040 0.300 0.430
73/08/25 08 25 ?.100 1.540 0.105 0.460 0.690
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/h)/0?
552201 LS 552201
£.2 55 30.0 08 49 30.0
‘ A K PIVF
15 FT ATPcINSON
T/LA F KOSHKONONG
F)C- IN’ BARK RIVER PARK
J IFPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
0063U 006?5 00610 00671 00665
! ArE TIME OEPTH ‘ 1U2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nr13—N PHOS—r)IS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF ‘1—TOTAL N TOTAL ()RTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L lr,/L lC,/L MC /L MG/L P
72/09/24 10 55 0.350 2.150 0.227 0.171 0.220
72/10/20 1? 45 0.810 1.400 0.09? 0.180 0.230
72/11/30 11 00 1.540 1.40 ) 0.110 0.110 0.1 4
72/12/27 12 25 1.620 1.400 0.250 0.100 0.140
73/01/29 1.500 1.200 0.120 0.091 0.120
73/02/26 10 45 1.3?0 0.960 0.?90 0.147 0.155
73/03/23 10 30 l.34a 3.1 o 0.110 0.063 0.13
73/04/13 10 45 1. 700 1.0 0 0.020 0.077 0.145
73/04/?9 14 40 0.760 7.100 0.050 ( ‘.1?0 0.185
73/05/15 14 30 0.910 1.700 0.030 0.140 0.230
73/05/?M 10 00 0.430 1.600 0.110 0.200 0.2i 0
73/O6/2 09 00 0.600 7.000 0.?30 0.280 0.461,
73/07/10 15 30 0.670 1.320 0.01 0.16G 0.2 0
73/03/25 10 00 0.720 1.470 0.09° 0.?50 (i.340
-------
STORET QET 1EVAL DATE 74/10/02
S S22EL Ls552?E1
43 04 00.0 088 46 30.0
JO’-INSON Cr EFK
55 35 WATERLOO
1/LANE KOSHKONON&
Co HWY Y AING ABV JOHNSON CREEK STP
IJEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—OTS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L ‘IG/L M6/L MG/L P MG/L P
7?/09/?3 11 00 0.240 ?.050 0.172 0.1?2 0.170
72/10/27 11 16 1.160 2.800 0.240 0.115 0.240
7?/Il/2f, 16 15 1.0’O 1.800 0.02? 0.011 0.048
72/12/16 14 40 1.160 1.600 O . I9 0.014 0.060
73/01/?3 13 45 1.660 1.470 0.110 0.037 0.080
73/02/11 16 10 1.600 ?.700 0.105 0.026 0.060
73/03/18 10 03 1.360 3.200 0.240 0.024 0.145
73/04/06 13 30 0.830 ?.730 0.09? 0.019 0.080
73/04/26 07 10 0.336 3.150 0.105 0.034 0.100
71/05/04 17 15 0.860 3.150 0.065 0.038 0.110
71/05/25 14 40 0.357 2.900 0.072 0.105 0.210
73/06/16 1? 15 0.770 2.800 0.180 0.126 0.315
73/07/30 0.390 2.000 0.005K 0.046 0.200
71/08/26 12 15 0.460 1.470 0.220 0.084 0.270
K VALUE NO N TO E LESS
T’4aN INDIC4TEO
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/0?
SS?2F1 LS5522F1
43 00 30.0 08 49 45.0
C WFISH P1VE
55 15 WATERLOO
T/LA$cE KOSHKONONG
(iS 1 BRDG 3ELO LAKE MILLS STP
11EP ? LES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 006?5 00610 00671 00665
OATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3P’ P OSOIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOT I ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L Mc,/L MG/I P MG/L P
72/09/23 10 30 0.400 1.900 0.13? 0.320 0.410
72/10/22 11 40 0.900 1.700 0.?20 0.240 0.345
72/11/26 16 45 1.640 1.500 0.044 0.110 0.180
7?#’1?/16 14 30 2. O0 1. 00 0.240 0.200 0.2 0
73/01/23 13 15 2.700 2. ’00 0.510 0.310 0.440
73/02/11 16 3? 1.440 7.000 0.147 0.140 0.210
73/03/18 09 40 1.560 2.500 0.138 0.13? 0.210
73/04/06 1? 45 1.600 2.110 0.021 o.oic 0.175
73/04/26 07 48 0.750 1.900 0.035 0.147 0.270
71/05/04 16 50 1.270 1.640 0.036 0.168 0.2 0
71/05/?5 14 00 0.670 3.000 0.063 0.210 0.320
73/06/16 13 09 0.200 1.760 0.198 0.294 0.530
73/07/30 0.038 ?.600 0.00 5K 0.189 0.470
73/08/?6 12 40 0.290 1.9Qt) 0.030 0.231 0.440
K VALUF KNOWN T ) - Lt.SS
THAN II’JDICATF.D
-------
STOPE:T PETRIEVAL DATE 74109/30
552250 AS 552250
1009164
42 55 30.0 088 51 30.0
CITY OF FORT ATKINSON
55 15 ATERL0O
T/LAKE KOSpIXONONG
P 0CK RIVER
1 IEPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665 50051 50053
OATF
TI 1E
DFPT’-4
NO? ”JO1
TOT KJEL
Nr43—N
PHOS-DIS
PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM
OF
-roTAL
i
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
M .,/L
MC,/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P INST MOD MONTHLY
73/01/18
08 00
CPU)—
0.050
24.000
5.950
4.900
5.77 ) 1.640 1.400
71/01/18
16 00
73/0?/05
OR 00
CP(T)—
0.59’)
19.900
5.000
5.880
8.600 1.960 1.670
73/O?/05
16 00
73/03/0;’
O 00
CP(T)—
(1.055
72.000
.I00
5.300
6.700 1.710 1.640
73/03/0?
16 00
73/O4 02
08 00
CP(T)—
(‘.4’O
fl.000
6.100
3.000
4.400 2.470 2.630
73/04/0?
16 00
71/05/0?
07 00
C°(T)—
0.9 7
10. 00
0.030
1.680
2.700 3.170 2.620
73/05/0?
16 00
71/06/04
OM 00
CP(T)-
1.29(
13.i 00
0.845
3.140
3.600 2.960 2.620
73/06/04
16 00
73/07/05
(i’ 00
CP(T)—
7 . )’Y ’
5.500
0.495
10.000
11.000 1.890 2.310
71/07/OS
16 10
71/08/0’
08 00
CP(T)—
2 .6uC
‘1.000
5.300
5.100
6.400 1.890 1.650
71/0R/0. ,
16 C
73/09/06
O ’ Ou
C U)—
0.Pr U
21.?Oi
c.R00
1.610 1.580
71/09/06
16 90
71/13/09
O £0
CP(T)—
U.1 0
1?.500
1.500
5.000
6.800 1.680 1.100
71/I0/0’
16 00
71/11/01
04 00
( ‘PU)—
1.8 ( 10
??.000
5.?50
4.900
7.400 1.610 1.570
71/11/Ut
1” Y)
71/)?/01
04 l 0
C (T)—
i.?70
9.000
8.100
6.600
11.000 1.980 1.360
71/1?f(H
‘6 9’)
-------
r
c-
1(1
7 /q4/Jc ( M O
C’ (1) —
7 /U/1 — L 4 ’ ‘C
‘.)-)7 ) j
40.3 O - -J j O.ti
‘ JT r u - J ATr j’ , iJ j
1L E I-L )’)
/4 t .Kt: K JS1K’)’\ )\J(,
rv
I I - L -S
ST)PET FTw!LVAL I) E. i’.i,;/: t
P00
?1 + 1204
‘)OOO FEET DEPTH
‘ € ‘
•j J ’-’
ur)’—l O
00671
t
u 1
‘jfl(
I I F
‘ ‘-T’-
‘j. Ju3
TOT KJEL
ih —N
PHOS—DIS
r r1U — F
CU J’)’ ii J
)
—F.JTAL
1OTAL
OPIHo
— AT
• ‘ Y
Ft T
. lO/L
4C-/L
1C,/L
MG/L P
‘ /L —
1 jST r -I ,U
• iJr4fHLy
6.700
L . • (
I • 37
1
-------
STODET - E1RIEVAL OArF 7 ./0 /30
552251 TF5522 51 P005429
43 30 00.0 08 48 30.0
CITY OF JEFFERSON
15 WATERLOO
1/LAKE KOSFIKONOMG
ROCK ‘ IVER
1IEPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE
TJ ’.iE
flEPT -4
4()2 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PIiOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
F ?OM
(IF
N-ToTAL
P4
TOTAL
OPT ’-IO
RATE
FLOWMGO
TO
DAI’
FEET
P41,/L
G/L
MG/I
M(VL P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/31/04
05 0’)
CP(T)—
4. ’40
5.300
0.144
4.437
1.680
1.200
73/0 1/05
05
73/02/06
0L
10
CP(T)—
6.5 ’) O
4.700
0.185
7.500
7.800
1.400
1.200
73/0?/07
04 00
71/01/00
OS 00
CP(T)—
4.200
?.A00
0.270
4.000
4.100
2.420
1.200
71/03/10
05 00
71/ ’/1
05 00
C2(T)—
4.00
2.400
0.360
6.100
7.600
1.830
1.700
7 1/04/ I l
05 00
73/05/10
05
‘‘1
CP(T)—
i.60)
5.400
3.068
2.400
3.600
2.710
2.500
73/OS/t I
05 0)
73/G6/2 6
05 0 ’)
CP(T)—
1.’i O
‘.500
0.P2O
6.100
7.000
1.290
1.450
71/06/27
t,:; 00
71/07/17
05
C (T)—
F.0 ,’,
. 400
O.1’ O
5.000
6.200
1.220
1.200
7’/07/I
05
71/OM/04
0 ’
C (F)—
3.’+u(,
.1f0
3.FO)0
3.7O0
1.260
1.200
71/0’ /0-
i
73/0’ /11
OS
iY)
C (T)—
- ‘ u
•j.071
7. 00
8.i O
1.020
1.100
71/OQ/ 12
OS C
71/1 0/IC
jS
CD(T)—
S.’ J )
?.S0
u.I00
10.000
12.500
1.470
1.200
7 3/1 3/Il
0
71/fl/0’
17 00
C°(T)—
“.Y ’)
?. )0
0.170
f,.100
1.100
1.160
1.200
71/11,0’
l
71/12/OS
OS ‘iu
C0(T)_
7.t
4.0i ’
‘. 7O
5.’ O0
7.000
1.700
1.200
ivi ,o’-
-------
STO ET ‘ ET TEVAL 1)Art 74/09/30
552251 TF552251 P005429
43 00 00.0 088 48 30.0
CITY OF JEFFERSON
55 15 WATERLOO
T/LAKE KOSHKONONG
ROCK RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DE 1
j3 3U 0Of 25 0061U 00671 00665 50051 50053
r) TF Tj r) PTH . U’V”O1 TOT KJF L NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOSTOT FLOW CONDUIT
FPf) 1 h -Tl)TAL N TOTAL OPTHO RATE FLOW—MOD
TO UAY FE T MG/L NIG/L MG/L MG/I P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
74/OI/(” ‘J ‘)0
CP(T)— 3. OO (i. ll O 10. ’O0 11.000 1.230 1.300
‘P ‘)C
-------
ST ET FT f VAL uAT ( ‘ 4/O / )
F ) 1
T I)
)) ) 3 .-) )?)_ .;3
uti. j )— -. ) s’). I
fL(’ )t C h -d
I —s ,TiI ,’- T’-
/L Ku’ -th r) J )
tj , -irc y’:) j. , s
I1 flL ,
t: I ‘41 ?04
( OU1) FEET ) Tr-I
; -, i
1 , )A
- JC
-71
iJj3
T1-
)I -‘r-1
T( 1 T KJ L
Ni —N
‘—I—I’IJ - -
—‘—ii),—tIT
FL )‘‘
C ’ - ii! I
1)1 ‘ I
N
TOTAL
) I ‘
F IJ —, bi)
) y
F 1
- 1 /L
‘C,/L
1”/L
•. /L —
I JS I i’’.
IdLY
7 /I))/fl7
10
.0”.
( P4t)
-
-.1)’
•,•(-.,
I.UC 4
71f 7/?-
I ’ 4
11
.‘I- l
tI. 1 Jr
- ‘.300
•
•‘. .
IJ. - 4
0.0 -fl-
71f0 ’ 4/O.
r
I2.- 30
‘).435
. /-
‘ .‘- ‘ “
‘.
c, Ij
71fC +/33
I)
J
). I( -
i
1 .1C 5
) - •
•— ) •
•I ) J
).13 )
71/ )’-/
Io
“)
+• 4j ,
1.’iSO
—..-.
-.. i•
. ‘-+
(i.1 ’(i
71/fl7/I?
ii
C(
‘j j-,.)
‘4 . (I
I) rI7p
j . ) ’- l
•O
7 /) f0
14
( ‘0
j.u f
71/CP/27
L.
3(
I.:rjt
)
;_.-)-\
•j r)
j J( L
7 i/ 1)/) -
I ‘
‘
•
-) • 120
- • •
•
- • 1
0 • I’
7 /fl/7
11
(‘
• .‘‘‘
. -iIj’’
1.’ -. Ic,
-..—
—•i()
) - (1
I,.U4
.
II
- • 2 t ,
1.J 1(
‘ 4. 7 ’)u
—., •
0.t 7
------- |