U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
PVWTUNING RESERVOIR
CRAWFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
AND
ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 425
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
PYWBIING RESERVOIR
CRAWFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
AND
ASKTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 425
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTICNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 18
VI. Appendices 19
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non—point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to
the Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James 1. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Allegheny Reservoir McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattaraugus, NY
Beaver Run Reservoir Westnoreland
Beltzville Carbon
Blanchard Reservoir Centre
Canadohta Crawford
Conneaut Crawford
Conewago (Pinchot) York
Greenlane Montgomery
Harveys Luzerne
Indian Somerset
Naomi Monroe
Ontelaunee Berks
Pocono Monroe
Pymatuning Reservoir Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Shenango River Reservoir Mercer
Stiliwater Monroe
Wallenpaupack Pike, Wayne
-------
PYMATUNING
RESERVOIR
0. Tributary Sampling
Site
XLake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment
Facility
Drainage Area
Boundary
2 ? 1 Km .
6 M1.
Scale
pork
(North Sh.ncn 9 o
TWP)
Map Location
? stot
RESERVOIR
-------
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR*
STORET NO. 4213
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and a report by others (Ketelle and Uttormark,
1971) indicate that Pymatuning Reservoir is eutrophic. It
ranked thirteenth in overall trophic quality when the 17 Penn-
sylvania lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination
of six lake parameters**. Sixteen of the lakes had less median
total phosphorus, 11 had less and two had the same median dis-
solved phosphorus, four had less and one had the same median
inorganic nitrogen, 16 had less mean chlorophyll a, and 15 had
greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
Survey limnologists reported surface algae in protected
areas as well as many submergent and emergent aquatic plants.
In a previous study, Tryon and Jackson (1952) considered
Pymatuning Reservoir as three ecologically different lakes;
i.e., Sanctuary Lake, “Middle Lake”, and “Lower Lake”, (see
map, page v); and Survey data tend to confirm this. For example
the mean chlorophyll a concentration at station A-l in Sanctuary
Lake was 100 pgfl, at station 2 in “Middle Lake” was 53 pg/l,
and at station 4 in “Lower Lake” was 28 g/l. Total phosphorus
* Table of metric conversions--Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
2
dissolved phosphorus, total alkalinity, and Secchi disc trans-
parencies showed similar patterns, but nitrogen did not.
However, in this report, the reservoir is considered as one
unit.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results show that Pymatuning Reservoir was
phosphorus limited when the sample was collected (04/21/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in July as well
but nitrogen limitation in October.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The phosphorus contributions of known
point sources amounted to 21% of the total load reaching Pyma-
tuning Reservoir during the sampling year. These sources
include Linesville, Pennsylvania (10.5%), Andover, Ohio (8.6%),
and three sewage treatment plants serving Pymatuning State Park
which collectively contributed 1.5% of the total.
The estimated phosphorus loading rate of 0.23 g/m 2 /yr is
only 1.4 times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974) as an oligotrophic rate (see page 17).
However, in view of the evidence of eutrophy in Pymatuning
Reservoir, it is probable that the calculated loading rate is
much too low and that unmeasured phosphorus inputs reached the
-------
3
lake during the sampling year (e.g., wastes from mobile home
parks just north of the mouth of McMichael Creek in Ohio).
Also, the Sanctuary Lake portion of the reservoir (see
map, page v) serves as a State waterfowl refuge, and consid-
erable numbers of resident and migratory ducks and geese
utilize the reservoir. On the basis of the numbers provided
by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources and
certain assumptions (see page 13), it is estimated that wild
ducks and geese contributed 3,415 kilograms of total phosphorus
(22.0% of the total load) to the reservoir during the sampling
year. While seemingly high, this estimate in fact may be too
low. In their study of a small, 15-hectare lake in the W. 1.
Kellogg Bird Sanctuary in southwestern Michigan, Manny, Wetzel,
and Johnson (1975) calculated that some 6,000 migrant Canada
geese contribute 59 kilograms of phosphorus to the lake each
year. On an areal basis, this amounts to 0.39 g/m 2 /yr as com-
pared to the Pymatuning Reservoir estimate of 0.05 g/m 2 /yr.
Because of the eutrophic condition of the lake and the
likelihood that the actual phosphorus loading rate is much
higher than estimated, all phosphorus inputs should be mini-
mized to the greatest practicable degree to slow the cultural
-------
4
aging of Pymatuning Reservoir as well as reduce the amount of
phosphorus contributed via the outlet to downstream Shenango
River Reservoir (Working Paper No. 426).
2. Non-point sources--It is estimated that 79% of the
total phosphorus input to Pymatuning Reservoir was contributed
by non-point sources during the sampling year. Ungaged tribu-
taries were estimated to have contributed 15.8%, the unnamed
creek D-l contributed 14.0%, Linesville Creek contributed 8.0%,
and Paden Creek contributed 4.8% of the total load. The seven
remaining gaged tributaries collectively contributed a total of
7.0% of the load.
The phosphorus export rate of unnamed creek D-l was a very
high 247 kg/km 2 /year (see page 17). This high rate and the low
export N/P ratio indicate that either the load from the Andover,
Ohio sewage treatment facility was underestimated, or additional
point sources in the municipal area were impacting the stream.
The export rate of Linesville Creek was a somewhat high
49 kg/km 2 /yr but probably was the result of urban drainage from
the community of Linesville rather than point-source impact.
Also, the export rate of unnamed creek J—1 was 46 kg/km 2 /yr.
However, considering the typical export N/P ratio of 30/1, it is
likely that this export rate is the result of an underestimation
of the drainage area of the stream.
-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 66.45 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 3.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 7.6 meters.
4. Volume: 245.865 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.4 years (based on outlet flow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries —
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (kmZ)* ( mS/sec)*
McMichael Creek 16.7 0.2
Black Creek 14.6 0.1
Unnamed Creek (D-l) 8.8 0.1
Gravel Run 14.0 0.1
Paden Creek 43.5 0.6
Linesville Creek 25.2 0.4
Bennett Run 18.1 0.2
Unnamed Creek (J-l) 2.7 0.1
Shenango River ? 0.2
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 188.9 3.3
Totals 332.5 5.3
2. Outlet -
Shenango River 398.9** 5.6
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods,
1973-1976’.
** Includes area of lake.
-------
6
C. Precipitation*:
1. Year of sampling: 111.0 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 96.8 centimeters.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
7
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Pymatuning Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from four stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 2.4 meters at station 1, 3.4 meters at station 2,
3.0 meters at station 3, and 6.1 meters at station 4.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHAkACTERISTICS FOR PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
STOREr CODE 4213
1ST SAMPLING C 4/21/73) 2ND SAMPLING ( 7/31/73) 3RD SAMPLING (10/ 6/73)
4 SITES 4 SITES 4 SITES
TEMP (C)
11.5 — 17.4
13.6
12.7
23.9 — 25.3
0155 OAY CMG/L)
8.8 — 11.5
10.1
10.0
7.3 — 9.1
24.4
17.8 — 18.8
18.4
18.4
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
150. — 190.
170.
170.
144. — 201.
8.0
8.8 — 10.0
9.4
9.4
PH (STAND UNITS)
8.0 — 8.7
8.2
8.1
7.2 — 9.2
153.
150.
126. — 136.
132.
133.
TOT AL (MG/U
31. — 39.
34.
32.
35• — 52.
8.3
8.3
7.9 — 9.1
8.4
8.4
TOT P (MG/I)
0.024 — 0.112
0.043
0.031
0.050 — 0.159
40.
38.
32. — 9.
37.
35.
ORTHO P (MG/L)
0.005 — 0.012
0.00&
0.007
0.005 — 0.015
0.086
0.078
0.070 — 0.490
0.141
0.090
N02.N03 (MG/ I .)
0.040 — 0.460
0.285
0.270
0.050 — 0.150
0.009
0.008
0.007 — 0.027
0.012
0.010
AMMONIA (MG/1)
0.050 — 0.130
0.075
0.070
0.060 — 0.140
0.091
0.090
0.020 — 0.100
0.043
0.030
KJEL N (MG/L)
0.600 — 1.800
0.918
0.800
0.800 — 2.000
0.090
0.040 — 0.190
0.080
0.070
INORG N (MG/LI
0.100 — 0.530
0.360
0.370
0.110 — 0.290
1.200
1.300 — 5.800
2.133
1.500
TUTAL N (MG/L)
1.040 — 1.840
1.204
1.100
0.850 — 2.120
0.184
1.355
0.180
0.060 — 0.280
0.123
0.100
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
7.7 — 61.4
28.0
21.5
43.1 — 105.6
1.290
1.320 — 5.890
2.177
1.530
SECCCII (METERS)
66.8
34.5 — 132.9
70.4
57.1
-------
9
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Algal units
Date Genera per ml
04/21/73 1. Aphanizomenon (?) 6,168
2. Flagellates 2,821
3. Scenedesmus 640
4. Cryptomonas 489
5. Synedra 451
Other genera 2,181
Total 12,750
07/31/73 1. Lyngbya 7,724
2. Stephanodlscus 1,657
3. Nitzschia 1,330
4. Anabaena 1,038
5. Scenedesmus 1,005
Other genera 3,571
Total 16,325
10/06/73 1. Lyngbya 3,535
2. Oscillatoria 1,964
3. Anabaena 1,375
4. Melosira 1,257
5. Flagellates 1,257
Other genera 5,422
Total 14,810
-------
10
Station Chlorophyll a
Number ( pg/i )
01 61.4
02 25.2
03 17.8
04 7.7
01 105.6
02 70.4
03 63.2
04 43.1
01 132.9
02 62.5
03 51.7
04 34.5
Maximum yield N/P
___________ ( mg/i- dry wtj Ratio
7.1 15/1
8.3 6/1
15.4 18/1
6.9 49/1
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling
Date
04/21 /73
07/31/ 73
10/06/73
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N
Spike (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i )
Control 0.030 0.460
0.050 P 0.080 0.460
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.080 1.460
1.0 N 0.030 1.460
2. Discussion —
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri—
cornutum , indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Pymatuning Reservoir was high at the time the sample was
collected. Also, the relatively small but significant in-
crease in yield when only orthophosphorus was added indicates
the reservoir was phosphorus limited at that time (note the
-------
11
lack of significant change in yield when only nitrogen was
added).
The relatively small increase in yield resulting from
the orthophosphorus spike was due to the shift to nitrogen
limitation when the excess phosphorus was added (note the
change in the N/P ratio). The control sample would have
become nitrogen limited with the addition of only about
0.004 mg/i of orthophosphorus, so about 0.046 mg/i of the
0.050 mg/i spike could not be utilized by the assay algae.
Hence the small growth response to the phosphorus addition.
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in July
also (the mean N/P ratio was 20/1) but nitrogen limitation
in October (the mean N/P ratio was 10/1, and nitrogen
limitation would be expected).
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff month of February when two samples were collected. Samp-
ling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
Nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were determined by using a
modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer program for calculating
stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-
source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/kni 2 /year, at stations B-i, C—l, E-l, F—l, and
H—i and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
The operator of the Linesville, PA, wastewater treatment plant
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The
operators of the wastewater treatment plants at Pymatuning State Park
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
provided monthly effluent samples. However, corresponding flow data
were not available for all sampling dates. The missing flows were
estimated using the mean value of the flows that were taken. The
total nutrient load was then adjusted to reflect a seasonal use of
four months per year. The Shangri-La Trailer Court and Andover, Ohio,
did not participate in the Survey, and nutrient loads were estimated
at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
Estimates of nutrient contributions by wild ducks and geese were
based on the following numbers of waterfowl using Pyniatuning Reservoir
as provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
(Ulanoski, 1975):
Summer resident ducks 7,500
Summer resident geese 2,500
Winter resident ducks 5,000
Winter resident geese 10,000
Migratory ducks 35,000
Migratory geese 20,000
In calculating the nutrient loads, the following assumptions were
made:
1. Each wild duck contributes 0.45 kg total nitrogen and
0.20 kg total phosphorus per year (Paloumpis and Starrett,
1960).
2. Each wild goose contributes the same amount as one duck
since geese typically feed in fields away from the lake
several hours each day.
3. Summer or winter resident waterfowl are at the lake for
six months of the year.
4. Migratory waterfowl spend a total of one month per year
at the lake; i.e., 15 days during Spring migration and 15
days during Fall migration.
-------
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known muncipal -
14
Name
Pop.
Served
Linesville l, 265 f
Shangri-La 18
Trailer Court**
State Park variable
(N. Shenango
Twp.)
State Park variable
(W. Shenango
Twp.)
State Park variable
(Pine Twp.)
Andover, OH 1,179
Treatment
act. sludge
act. sludge
+ ponds
ext. aer.
ext. aer.
ext. aer.
prim.
clarifier
Mean Flow
(m 3 Jd)
754.2
6.8*
12.6
51 .7
35.3
446. 3*
Recei ving
Water
Linesville Creek
Pymatuning Res.
Pymatuning Res.
Pymatuning Res.
Pymatuning Res.
Unnamed Stream
(D-1)
2. Known industrial
- None
f 1970 Census.
* Estimated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
** Riggs, 1973.
-------
15
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
McMichael Creek 175 1.1
Black Creek 140 0.9
Unnamed Creek (0-1) 2,170 14.0
Gravel Run 245 1.6
Paden Creek 745 4.8
Linesville Creek 1,245 8.0
Bennett Run 190 1.2
Unnamed Creek (J-1) 125 0.8
Shenango River 215 1.4
b. Minor tributaries & itmiediate
drainage (non-point load) - 2,455 15.8
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Linesville 1,635 10.5
Shangri-La Trailer Court 20 0.1
State Park (N. Shenango Twp.) 35 0.2
State Park (W. Shenan9o Twp.) 160 1.0
State Park (Pine Twp.) 30 0.2
Andover, OH 1,335 8.6
d. Septic tanks* - 15 0.1
e. Known industrial — None - -
f. Wild ducks and geese - 3,415 22.0
g. Direct precipitation** - 1,165 7.5
Total 15,515 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet - Shenango River 7,675
3. Net annual P accumulation - 7,840 kg.
* Estimate based on 61 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
16
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
McMichael Creek 5,775 2.2
Black Creek 3,430 1.3
Unnamed Creek (D-1) 4,565 1.7
Gravel Run 6,265 2.3
Paden Creek 27,065 10.1
Linesville Creek 19,605 7.3
Bennett Run 13,070 4.9
Unnamed Creek (J-1) 3,700 1.4
Shenango River 6,065 2.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) - 89,650 33.5
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Linesville 2,270 0.8
Shangri—La Trailer Court 60 <0.1
State Park (N. Shenango Twp.) 235 0.1
State Park (W. Shenango Twp.) 1,100 0.4
State Park (Pine Twp.) 375 0.1
Andover, OH 4,010 1.5
d. Septic tanks* — 650 0.2
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Wild ducks and geese - 7,690 2.8
g. Direct precipitation** - 71,740 26.8
Total 267,320 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Shenango River 203,450
3. Net annual N accumulation - 63,870 kg.
* Estimate based on 61 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
17
Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdralnage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr N/km 2 /yr N/P ratio
McMichael Creek 10 346 35/1
Black Creek io 235 24/1
Unnamed Creek (D-1) 247 519 2/1
Gravel Run 18 448 25/1
Paden Creek 17 622 37/1
Linesville Creek 49 778 16/1
Bennett Run 10 722 72/1
Unnamed Creek (J-l) 46 1,370 30/1
Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
welder and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 0.23 0.12 4.0 1.0
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Pymatuning Reservoir:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 0.32
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.16
D.
E.
-------
18
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Hartman, Richard 1., and J. Herbert Graffius, 1960. Quantitative
seasonal changes in the phytoplankton communities of Pymatuning
Reservoir. Ecology 41(2):333-340.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj. #
16010 EHR, Washington, DC.
Manny, B. A., R. G. Wetzel, and W. C. Johnson, 1975. Annual contri-
bution of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus by migrant Canada
geese to a hardwater lake. Verh. mt. Ver. Limnol. 19:949-951.
Paloumpis, A. A., and W. C. Starrett, 1960. An ecological study of
the benthic organisms in three Illinois River flood plain lakes.
Amer. Midl. Nat. 64(2):406-435.
Riggs, Ralph W., 1973. Treatment plant questionnaire (Shangri-La
Trailer Court STP). Jamestown.
Tryon, Clarence Archer, Jr., and Daniel F. Jackson, 1952. Summer
plankton productivity of Pymatuning Lake, Pennsylvania. Ecology
33(3) :342-350.
Ulanoski, James, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry;
waterfowl numbers). PA Dept. Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
19
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FA(;TORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x l0 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4224 LAKE NAOMI 445
2 4220 BELTZVILLE OAM 423
3 4222 HARVEY’S LAKE 413
4 4228 STILLWATER LAKE 401
5 4227 POCONO LAKE 389
6 4223 INDIAN LAKE 388
7 3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR 385
8 4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPAC c 371
9 4221 CANADOHTA LAKE 369
10 4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR 360
11 4204 CONNEAUT LAKE 307
12 4226 PINCHOT LAKE 256
13 4213 PYHATUNING RESERVOIR 206
14 4216 SMENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR 157
15 4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM 101
16 4201 BLANCHARD RESERVOIR 85
17 4207 GREENLANE DAM 53
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEX
CuOL LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CHLORA MIN DO D1SS P NO
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR 56 ( 9) 38 ( 6) 63 C 10) 100 ( 16) 69 ( 11) 59 C 8) 385
4201 BLANCHARD RESERVOIR 13 C 2) 13 ( 2) 25 C 4) 31 C 5) 3 C 0) 0 C 0) 85
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE 44 C 7) 63 ( 10) 69 C 11) 56 C 9) 34 ( 5) 41 ( 6) 307
4207 GREENLANE DAM 6 ( 1) 6 C 1) 19 C 3) 13 C 2) 3 C 0) 6 ( 1) 53
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR 0 ( 0) 72 C ii) 6 ( 1) 0 ( 0) 100 C 16) 28 ( 4) 206
4216 SP4ENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR 19 C 3) 44 ( 7) 13 C 2) 6 C 1) 47 C 7) 28 C 4) 157
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR 94 ( 15) 19 C 3) 88 C 14) 81 C 13) 19 C 2) 59 ( 8) 360
4220 BELTZVILLE DAM 88 ( 14) 25 C 4) 94 C 15) 94 C 15) 34 ( 5) 88 C 13) 423
4221 CANADOHTA LAKE 50 ( 8) 97 ( 15) 56 C 9) 19 C 3) 59 C 9) 88 ( 13) 369
4222 HARVEY’S LAKE 63 C 10) 81 C 13) 100 C 16) 63 C 10) 47 ( 7) 59 C 8) 413
4223 INDIAN LAKE 100 ( 16) 31 ( 5) 75 ( 12) 75 ( 12) 19 ( 2) 88 C 13) 388
4224 LAKE NAOMI 81 ( 13) 88 ( 14) 44 C 7) 69 C 11) 88 C 14) 75 ( 12) 445
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM 25 ( 4) 0 C 0) 0 C 0) 44 C 7) 19 ( 2) 13 C 2) 101
4226 PINCIIOT LAKE 31 C 5) 56 C 9) 31 C 5) 38 C 6) 81 C 13) 19 ( 3) 256
4227 POCONO LAKE 38 C 6) 97 C 15) 50 C 8) 88 C 14) 75 ( 12) 41 C 6) 389
4228 STILLWATER LAKE 72 ( 11) 72 C 1)) 38 ( 6) 25 ( 4) 94 C 15) 100 C 16) 401
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
72 C 11) 50 C 8) 81 C 13) 50 ( 8) 59 C 9) 59 ( 8)
371
-------
LAKE
DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL
P
MEDIAN
INO G
N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CHLORA
15—
MIN DO
MEDIAN
DISS P
3641
ALLEGHENY r ESERVOIR
0.015
0.380
414.250
3.700
13.800
0.006
4201
BLANCrIARD RESERVOIR
0.0b4
1.300
453.143
15.187
14.900
0.046
4204
CONNEAUT LAKE
0.023
0.185
402.000
7.567
14.600
0.007
4207
GREENLANE DAM
0.066
1.’.75
460.222
24.011
14.900
0.020
‘4213
PYMATUNING RESENVOIR
0.070
0.180
467.750
56.333
7.700
0.008
4216
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
0.058
0.340
463.5 55
26.800
14.500
0.008
‘*219
BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
0.009
0.835
38 ’..833
5.183
14.800
0.006
4220
8ELTZVILLE DAM
0.010
0.815
362.444
4.856
14.600
0.005
4221
CANADOHTA LAKE
0.020
0.130
436.000
19.167
14.100
0.005
4222
HARVEY’S LAKE
0.015
0.160
338.000
5.967
14.500
0.006
6223
INDIAN LAKE
0.008
0.520
400.222
5.211
14.800
0.005
4224
LAKE NAOMI
0.014
0.135
443.333
5.533
8.000
0.005
4225
ONTELAUNEE DAM
0.040
2.150
470.667
11.783
14.800
0.011
4226
PINCHOT LAKE
0.027
0.245
453.000
13.950
11.500
0.008
4227
POCONO LAKE
0.024
0.130
438.800
4.960
13.200
0.007
4228
STILLWATER LAKE
0.015
0.180
449.000
18.233
7.900
0.004
4229
LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
0.015
0.250
394.583
9.617
14.100
0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRI8UTA Y FLOW INFOkMAT ION Fuk LNNSYLVANIA 1/27/75
LAKE CODE 4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIM
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S0 KM) 398.9
SUB—DRAINAGE NO . MAL1ZEt) FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY AREA(S0 1 (N) JAN FEEl MAR A R MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
4213A1 398.9 6.14 7.02 7.62 5.49 4.25 4.28 5.10 5.80 7.67 5.38 3.62 4.87 5.60
4213B1 16.7 0.25 0.28 0.48 0.28 0.14 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.1’. 0.15
4213C1 14.6 0.11 0.13 0.25 0.13 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.06
421301 8.8 0.14 0.14 0.19 0.14 0.10 0.05 0.0’. 0.02 0.02 0.0’. 0.07 0.10 0.09
4213E1 14.0 0.20 0.22 0.31 0.22 0.13 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.12
4213F 1 43.5 1.02 1.08 1.42 1.08 0.71 0.37 0.27 0.16 0.12 0.25 0.51 0.74 0.64
421361 25.2 0.57 0.59 0.76 0.59 0.42 0.27 0.21 0.1’. 0.11 0.19 0.34 0.45 0.39
4213141 18.1 0.37 0.40 0.54 0.40 0.24 0.11 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.25 0.22
4213)1 2.7 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.13 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.07
4213 1 (1 0.0 0.31 0.34 0.48 0.34 0.21 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.19
42 13ZZ 251.2 5.24 5.64 7.84 5.64 3.57 1.81 1.30 0.79 0.59 1.19 2.46 3.71 3.30
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE ARLA OF LAKE = 398.9 TOTAL FLOW IN 63.15
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAG€ AREAS = 394.8 rOTAL FLOW OUT = 67.25
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
‘.213A1 5 73 11.21 19 12.35
6 73 6.77 9 11.84
7 73 2.19 6 2.46
8 73 2.94 10 2.86
9 73 4.76 8 4.79
10 73 4.87 6 4.87
11 73 5.04 3 5.01
12 73 5.52 7 4.96
1 74 11.19 5 7.93
2 74 12.66 2 11.86
3 74 4.98 21 4.39
4 74 9.63 20 13.79
421381 5 73 0.27 19 0.06
6 73 0.11 9 0.09
7 73 0.02 6 0.03
8 73 0.02 10 0.00
9 73 0.00 8 0.00
10 73 0.01 6 0.02
11 73 0.08 3 0.19
12 73 0.23 7 0.03
1 74 0.42 5 0.06
2 74 0.12 2 0.11
3 7’. 0.85 21 0.23
4 74 0.34 20 (i.11
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFOl MATION FON PENNSYLVANIA 1/27/75
LANE CODE 4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CNS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4213C1 5 73 0.13 19 0.02
6 73 0.04 9 0.03
7 13 0.00 6 0.01
8 13 0.00 10 0.0
9 73 0.0 8 0.0
10 73 0.00 6 0.00
11 73 0.03 3 0.08
12 73 0.10 7 0.01
1 74 0.24 5 0.02
2 74 0.05 2 0.04
3 74 0.57 21 0.10
4 74 0.17 20 0.04
421301 5 73 0.14 19 0.06
6 73 0.09 9 0.08
7 73 0.03 6 0.04
8 13 0.03 10 0.01
9 73 0.01 8 0.02
10 73 0.03 6 9.03
11 73 0.07 3 0.12
12 73 0.13 7 0.05
1 74 0.18 5 0.07
2 74 0.09 2 0.09
3 74 0.26 21 0.13
4 74 0.16 20 0.09
4213E1 5 73 0.22 19 0.07
6 73 0.11 9 0.10
7 73 0.03 6 0.05
8 73 0.03 10 0.01
9 73 0.01 8 0.01
10 73 0.03 6 0.03
11 73 0.09 3 0.17
12 73 0.19 7 0.05
1 74 0.28 5 0.08
2 74 0.12 2 0.10
3 74 0.48 21 0.19
4 74 0.26 20 0.12
4213F1 5 73 1.05 19 0.42
6 73 0.62 9 0.59
7 73 0.20 6 0.28
8 73 0.23 10 0.07
9 73 0.09 8 0.09
10 73 0.20 6 0.22
11 73 0.51 3 0.85
12 73 0.96 7 0.31
1 74 1.39 5 0.45
2 74 0.68 2 0.62
3 74 2.01 21 0.96
4 74 1.22 20 0.65
-------
I. IdiJ14HY FLO w LINFUt’lMAFION FuN r bSN YLVAN1A 1/27/75
LAr E CODE 4213 UYMATUN1N4 tS OIN
MEAN HONTNLY FLOwS ANti UAILY FLOwS(CMS
TRIBUFARY tiONiri (LA MLAI FLOW ). .( FLOW DAY FLOw DAY FLOW
421301 5 73 0.59 19 0.2 ’ ,
6 73 0.40 9 0.31
7 73 0.16 6 0.22
8 73 .1S 10 0.07
4 73 0.08 8
10 73 0.16 6 v.18
11 /3 0.34 3 U.4 8
12 7 -s 0.57 7 0.24
1 /‘. J./’. S 0.31
2 74 0.4’ 2 u. 40
3 1’. 0.99 21
1 74 J.6 1 20 .40
42 13H1 5 73 0.40 1 v .13
6 73 0.21 9 v.19
7 /3 0.05 o 0.08
8 73 0.06 10 v.02
9 13 v.02 o 0.02
10 73 0.j 5 6 0.06
I l 73 0.16 3 0.28
12 73 0.34 / u.u9
1 74 0.51 5 0.14
2 /4 0.2 2 0.21
3 74 0.82 21 0.34
1. /4 0.45 20 0.21
421 3J1 5 73 0.13 1 0.05
6 73 0.07 9 0.07
7 73 .u2 6 0.03
8 73 0.02 10 U.u l
9 73 0.ul 8 v.01
10 73 0.0:? 6 0.02
11 73 0.u6 3 0.10
12 73 0.11 7 v.03
1 74 0.17 5 v.05
2 14 0.uS 2 0.07
3 74 0.26 21 0.11
4 . .1.15 20 0.07
4213K1 5 73 0.3’. 19 0.12
6 7i 0.13 9 0.16
7 73 0.u 8
8 73 u.uS 10 0.01
9 73 0.u? 6 v.02
10 73 0.0, 6
I I 73 v.1’. 3 v.26
12 73 0.28 / 0.08
1 1’. 0.45 5 v.12
2 14 v.20 2 v.18
3 14 0.71 21 0.28
4 74 0.40 13 0.19
-------
T 1d1JTAe Y FLow 1i t-O HATiu Fu NNSYLVANIA j/ 7/75
LA cE CODE 4213 PYMATUNINu RESE VO1R
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANO DAILY FLO S(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW UA( FLOW DAY FLOW
4213ZZ 5 73 5.55 19 .o 7
6 73 3.11 9 2.89
7 73 0.96 b 1.39
8 73 1.08 10 0.34
9 73 0.42 8 0.45
10 73 0.93 6 1.05
11 73 2.49 3 4.30
12 73 4.96 7 1.53
1 74 7.45 .21
2 7’. 3.37 2 3.09
3 74 11.84 21 4.90
4 74 6.51 20 3.20
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
421301
41 37 45.0 080 26 22.0
PYMATUNING REI VO1R
4 )39 PENNSYLVANiA
1 IEPALES
3
2111202
0010 FEET DEPTH
73/04/21 11 00 0000
11 00 0008
73/07/31 14 10 0000
14 10 0005
73/10/06 16 00 0000
16 00 0005
00665 32217
Pi- os—Tor CPILRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
(,.063
0.112
0 • 154
0 • 159
0.1db
0.490
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/04/21
11 00
11 00
0000
0008
73/07/31
14 10
14 10
0000
0005
73/10/06
16 00
16 00
0000
0005
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
00010
00300
00u77
00094
00400
00’s1O
00610
00625
00630
00b71
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
P P- i
T
ALK
NH3-N
TOT KJEL
NO2 .N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCr4I
FIELt)
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MLCRUMrIO
S D
MG/L
M(.,/L
MG/L
M(,/L
MG/L P
17.4
18
iS o
8.70
39
0.060
1.800
0.040
0.009
16.9
11.5
190
d.S0
38
0.060
1.500
0.080
0.010
24.6
17
152
8.90
52
u.12u
2.000
0.120
0.008
24.4
7.5
201
7.70
49
0.140
1.800
0.150
0.010
18.8
14
132
9.10
49
0.130
2.900
0.100
0.019
18.4
9.0
135
8.00
45
0.190
5.800
0.090
0.027
61.4
105.6
132.9
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
421302
41 38 55.0 080 29 27.0
PYMATUNIN(, RESERVOIR
42039 PENNSYLVANIA
1 1EPALES
3
2111202
0013 FEET DEPTH
73/04/21 11 25 0000
11 25 0011
73/07/31 13 45 0000
13 45 0005
13 45 0010
73/10/06 16 15 0000
16 15 0005
.O48
0.048
0.081
0.085
0.091
0.104
0.108
DATE
FROM
To
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
73/04/21 11 25 0000
11 25 0011
73/07/31 13 45 0000
13 45 0005
13 45 0010
73/10/06 16 15 0000
16 15 0005
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
NO2 NO3
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROI4HO
SO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
14.6
48
160
8.60
35
0.050
0.900
0.200
0.007
14.4
11.4
160
8.60
34
0.130
0.900
0.180
0.007
25.3
20
150
9.20
38
0.110
1.400
0.130
0.008
24.4
8.9
148
8.60
39
0.090
1.100
0.090
0.015
24.3
8.0
148
8.30
37
0.100
1.200
0.090
0.009
18.6
28
126
8.80
35
0.080
2.000
0.040
0.011
18.4
10.0
127
8.40
33
0.050
1.700
0.030
0.008
DATE
FROM
To
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PItOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
25 • 2
70.4
62.5
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
73/04/21 14 00 0000
14 00 0004
14 00 0010
73/07/31 13 20 0000
13 20 0005
13 20 0010
73/10/06 16 25 0000
16 25 0005
0.027
0.036
0.031
0.070
0.077
0.0 78
0.073
0.090
421303
41 36 28.0 080 30 39.0
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
42039 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
1 IEPALES
3.
73/04/21 14 00 0000
14 00 0004
14 00 0010
73/07/31 13 20 0000
13 20 0005
13 20 0010
73/10/06 16 25 0000
16 25 0005
2111202
0014 F .ET
DEPTH
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
M&/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
12.3
66
170
8.10
37
0.060
0.800
0.260
0.005
12.7
8.8
170
8.10
31
0.080
0.800
0.300
0.012
11.7
9.5
160
8.00
32
0.100
0.800
0.270
0.009
24.5
20
144
8.90
38
0.090
1.200
0.080
0.009
24.2
9.1
146
8.50
36
0.090
1.200
0.090
0.007
23.9
7.8
145
7.60
35
0.080
1.200
0.090
0.006
18.8
32
133
8.70
34
0.070
1.400
0.030
0.010
17.8
10.0
130
8.30
32
0.050
1.500
0.030
0.010
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
17.8
63.2
51.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
421304
41 33 00.0 080 30 36.0
PYMATUNIN(, RESERVOIR
42039 PENNSYLVANIA
I1EPALES 2111202
3 0025 FEET DEPTH
00010 u0300 00077 00094 004u0 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO T ANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI F1ELI) CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES M1CI OMH0 SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L - MG/L P
73/04/21 14 30 0000 12.7 66 175 8.00 32 0.060 0.600 0.440 0.006
14 30 0004 12.7 10.6 180 8.00 31 0.070 0.600 0.460 0.007
14 30 0015 12.4 10.0 180 8.00 31 0.070 0.700 0.460 0.006
14 30 0020 U.S 9.0 180 8.00 31 0.080 0.700 0.450 0.005
73/07/31 11 10 0000 24.7 2’. 152 8.30 39 0.070 1.100 0.060 0.005
11 10 0005 24.4 8.5 152 7.80 38 0.060 0.800 0.050 0.006
11 10 0015 24.1 7.3 150 7.20 41 0.070 0.900 0.050 0.011
73/10/06 16 40 0000 18.8 34 136 8.40 35 0.070 1.300 0.030 0.007
16 40 0005 18.2 9.4 135 8.00 36 0.040 1.300 0.020 0.007
16 40 0014 18.1 8.8 135 7.90 34 0.040 1.300 0.020 0.008
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPr-IYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET M6/L P UG/L
73/04/21 14 30 0000 0.024 7,7
14 30 0004 0.027
14 30 OO ls 0.026
14 30 0020 0.028
73/07/31 11 10 0000 0.050 43.1
11 10 0005 0.050
11 10 0015 0.052
73/10/06 16 40 0000 0.070 34.5
16 40 0005 0.070
16 40 0014 0.076
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE (5/02/03
421341
‘.1 29 50.0 i80 27 12.0
SHENANi,O R1 ER
42091 7.5 w G E NV1LLE
O/PYMATUNjN ., r ES
ANr NEAR DAM ANL) A OV CON WITH SUGAR RU
I 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTri
00630 00625 00610 00671 006b
DATE TIhIE DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TUT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P M(j/L P
73/Os/19 11 40 0.37 0.910 0.126 0.011 0.050
73/06/0 13 00 0.370 1.200 0.089 0.011 0.030
73/07/06 11 55 0.190 1.000 0.132 3.011 J.U +5
73/08/11 13 15 0.013 0.840 0.059 u.00 K U.U S
73/09/08 13 05 ( ,. O I Otc 1.050 o.o27 0.01 0.0 5
73/10/20 12 15 0.010 K 0.850 0.046 j.014 0.070
73/11/0’. 11 15 0.028 0.500 0.056 0.00 0.065
73/12/16 09 00 0.072 0.300 0.054 0.008 0.015
74/01/05 10 00 1.180 0.900 0.044 0.005K 0.020
74/02/03 09 00 0.340 1.100 0.150 0.005K 0.030
74/02/18 09 00 0.320 0.700 0.145 0.005K 0.025
74/03/02 09 00 0.528 0.900 u.210 o.020 0.035
74/04/20 09 00 0.420 0.900 0.025 (,.010 0.04
K VALUE KN0 N TO bE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET €TR1EVAL DATE 75/02/03
4213b1
41 J2 28.0 080 J2 02.0
MCMICrfAEL C EtK
42 7.5 4NuOVL
T/PYMATUNING i ES
PYMATUNI u LK i D bRDG .5 ML N OF SIMONS
11LI ALLS 2111204
‘4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 0O6b
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PrtOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O’- THO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P MG/L P
73/05/19 12 45 U.42t) 0.940 0.025 0.018 u.U50
73/06/0 13 20 0.960 0.840 0.034 0.037 0.060
73/07/06 12 35 0.294 0.740 0.039 0.022 0.055
73/08/11 13 35 0.115 0.760 0.036 0.016 0.055
73/09/08 13 25 0.010K 0.940 0.031 0.022 0.0i5
73/10/20 12 30 0.019 0.475 0.021 0.011 0.020
73/11/04 11 00 0.036 0.850 0.068 0.044 0.095
73/12/16 09 30 L. lb O 0.600 0.040 0.012 0.035
7 /01/05 10 45 1.180 0.400 0.034 0.005K 0.020
74/02/03 09 30 0.680 0.500 0.035 0.015 0.045
7 /02/18 09 30 0.630 0.500 0.045 0.010 0.055
74/03/02 09 30 9.600 0.700 0.030 0.010 0.035
74/04/20 09 30 0.520 0.450 0.025 0.017 0.052
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOi L.T NETI UEVAL DATE 75/02/03
42 tiC!
‘ii 3’. 43.0 0e u 3 05.0
LAC CkEtrc
‘+2 7.b uNUOVE
T/PYMATUNING - E
F- YM4TLJNjNU LK ki) LX, .4 s JCT (,It3HS L)
11EP LES
4 0000 F 1 UEPTrI
00630 (, 0625 00610 00671 00665
DAlE rIME DEPIri NU2 .N(J3 TOT KJEL Nr13-N riOS-DIs P,-10s-TUT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTi-lO
TO DAY FEET M i/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/05/19 13 25 0.250 0.660 0.039 0.020 u.L ,40
73/06/09 13 35 u.357 1.050 0.068 0.032 0.065
73/07/06 12 45 v.105 0. 3S 0.072 0.026 U.06
7j/OB/11 13 50 0.056 3.400 0.067 3.072 0.330
73/09/08 13 35 j.oi0 ,c 1.350 0.310 0.021 0.085
73/10/20 12 30 0.012 0.800 v.037 0.012 0.090
73/11/04 10 45 1.803 1.000 0.04’. v.012 0.075
73/12/16 09 45 1.090 0.400 0.036 0.015
74/01/05 11 00 1.440 0.800 u.0 4 C 0.008 0.015
74/02/03 09 45 u.67u 1.000 0.135 0.055 0.095
74/02/18 09 45 v.630 0. 0U 0.135 0.055 U.11
74/03/02 09 ‘+5 U.ts20 0.200 0.095 0.025 U.Olu
74/04/20 09 45 0.216 0.500 0.04u 0.015 v.045
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THaN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
421301
41 36 28.0 080 3 45.0
UNNAMED CI tEK
42 7.5 Ai UUV
T/PYMATUNING iEES
l YMATUN1N(, LK L) 8I OG 1.d OF ANDOVER
I IEPALES
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00530 00625 00610 00671 0Uo6
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 WO3 TOT KJEL Nd3—N PHOS—DIS PriOS-TtJT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L HG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/05/19 13 50 1.520 0.960 0.066 0.560 U.6 0
73/06/09 13 45 2.040 1.390 0.210 0.790 0.950
73/07/06 12 55 4.900 1.200 0.072 2.000 2.300
73/08/11 14 00 3.300 0.945 0.063 2.700 2.700
73/09/06 13 45 5.700 1.050 0.077 3.500 3.880
73/10/20 13 00 1.500 1.150 0.410 4.200 4.200
li/kilO ’. 10 30 1.260 1.300 0.276 0.645 0.780
73/Id/to 10 15 1.440 0.700 0.116 0.900 0.930
74/01/05 11 45 0.660 0.800 0.132 0.008 0.u25
74/02/03 11 15 1.300 0.575 0.010 0.005K 0.030
74/02/18 10 15 1.200 0.500 0.025 0.005K 0.040
74/03/02 10 25 0.980 1.100 0.260 0.200 Q.29u
74/04/20 10 15 0.480 1.200 0.610 0.575 0.610
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET HITRIEVAL OM1L 75/0 ?/ i3
‘sd l3L l
41 31 dS.u 080 32 33.0
(,r. AVLL P UN
7. Ai DO /E
T/PYMATUNIN(, * s
i MA [ UN1N(, Us t) d DC,
1 IEPALLS
‘4
1 N JCT FEN cELL D
211 120 ’+
0000 FEET DEi- T,-i
DATE
FIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT P JEL
NH3—N
PriOS—DIS
i-’riOs—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTrIO
TO
UAY
FEET
MIj/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
73/05/19
14
10
0.270
0.890
0.015
0.016
0.IJb- ,
73/06/09
13
50
0.115
1.050
0.062
0.0L9
0.085
73/07/06
13
00
0.330
1.250
0.038
0.046
u.09 0
73/08/11
15
15
0.120
1.000
3. ObO
0.038
0.110
73/09/08
13
50
0.280
1.u su
0.074
0.031
0.095
73/10/20
13
30
0.310
1.450
u.154
0.024
0.u67
73/11/04
it)
20
1.600
(p.600
u.060
0.016
u. iuS
73/12/16
10
45
1.120
0.700
0.088
0.020
0.060
74/01/05
11
30
1.120
0.400
0.040
0.008
0.015
74/02/03
10
45
1.340
0.500
0.020
0.005K
0.030
74/02/18
10
45
1.260
0.500
6.012
0.005K
0.040
74/03/02
10
45
1.200
0. i00
0.100
0.030
74/04/20
10
45
0.288
0.600
u.03
0.015
3.Uds
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATEL )
-------
STORET ETrUEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4213F1
41 -.1 27.0 080 29 28.0
f AOEN Ck tt
‘.2 7.5 LINESVILLE
T/r YMAJUNING ES
US HWY 6 8R06 NLA .icr WITH HALL D
11Li ’ uLES 2111204
4 0000 FEt.T D&TH
00630 00625 OQolO 00671 00 6
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2&N03 or KJEL NH3—N PhOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ONTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L t’ Mb/L
73/05/19 14 40 0.470 0.480 0.009 0.008
73/06/09 1’. 10 0.680 0.760 0.026 0.017
73/07/06 13 20 0.741 , 0.830 0.033 0.026
73/08/11 15 30 0.290 1.400 0.056 0.023 0.090
73/09/08 14 15 0.500 0.860 0.063 0.032 0.060
73/10/20 14 00 0.010K 0.900 0.025 0.013
73/11/0’. 10 00 u.83U 0.450 0.024 0.012 0.075
73/12/16 11 00 0.910 0.200 0.028 u.012 u.0 12
74/01/05 14 00 1.431, 0.400 v.040 0.008 O.u IS
74/02/03 11 00 0.51 Q 1.000 0.025 0.005K 0.u30
74/02/18 11 00 0.560 0.400 0.020 0.005K O.u ’ .5
74/03/02 12 00 0.900 0. 0u 0.035 0.015 0.020
74/04/20 11 00 0.550 0.300 0.017 0.012 0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO ET NETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
421 3(., 1
41 3’ 0u.U Odu 25 10.0
L1I’JtSVLLLt. CRtEK
42 1. LINESVILLL
1/PYMAIUNING r ES
U t-IWY 6 kL)G IN LINLSVILLE.
11L ALES 2111204
4 0000 F .T DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00bb5
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS Pt-10s—IOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET H( /L MG/L M6/L MG/L P
73/05/19 15 20 1.020 0.830 0.100 0.231 u.343
73/06/09 14 25 1.300 0.900 0.200 0.360 0.420
73/o7/06 13 35 1.200 0.690 0.022 0.017 0.060
73/08/11 16 00 1.000 0.290 0.115 0.034 0.065
73/09/08 14 45 C..830 0.440 0.027 0.019
73/10/20 14 45 0.280 1.000 0.069 3.115 0.130
73/11/05 15 30 0.148 0.250 0.012 0.012 0.060
73/12/16 11 20 1.120 1.150 0.112 0.016 (J.Oi O
14/01/05 1’. iS 1.430 0.400 0.028 0.008 U.u l O
74/02/03 11 20 u.9 80 0.600 0.045 0.005 (i.u’.0
74/02/18 11 20 0.940 0.700 0.165 0.00 5K 0.05s
74/03/02 13 30 1.260 0.500 0.020 0.015 0.02
74/04/20 11 20 0.924 0.300 0.u25 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO bE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET ET IEVAL DATE 1S/02/ )3
‘+ j3rij
‘.1 ib 44.0 (n3U 26 30.0
I ENNt.TT UN
42 1.5 HA TSTOWN
1/ YMATuN1NG t:S
5 C 1(L) b O(, I MI NE OF
11E ALL
N s iENANGO
2111204
0000 FEET OEPTri
00630
00625
00610
00671
00b6
1)ATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
Nh3—N
t-iOS—DLS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
URTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
ML/L
MG/L
MG/L
MC /L P
M(,/L r
73/0 /19
16
10
0.820
0.780
0.u39
0.012
0.020
73/06/09
10
20
1.100
0.630
0.039
0.024
0.u35
73/u7/06
10
27
1.72o
0.880
0. 052
u. 025
0.035
73/08/11
10
40
2.200
0.340
0.033
0.012
0.u3
7,109/08
10
45
2.000
1.150
0.049
).0l4
0.u25
73/10/20
11
00
0.950
0.’.O0
0.025
0.013
0.020
73/11/04
09
45
0.890
0.650
0.020
0.012
0.010
73/12/16
11
40
1.500
0.200
0.024
0.012
0.015
74/01/05
14
45
1.4 .0
0.300
0.076
0.005K
0.0.10
74/02/03
11
40
O.b20
0.800
0.025
0.005K
0.020
74/02/18
11
00
0.780
0.600
0.055
0.005K
0.030
74/03/02
11
40
0.960
0.410
0.040
0.030
0.u u
74/04/20
11
40
0.860
0.200
0.015
0.010
0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
S1O LT ET IEVAL DATE 7 /U2/03
421 JJ I
41 ii 40.0 UdU 2 40.0
O’INAMLI) C EtK
47 7• HAkT ,TOwN
F/PYMATUI\IIt IG r LS
St.C Li dr Ui, .8 MI N OF WESTVO’W
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FttT DE 1r1
00530 00525 00610 0 0b71 Uu65
DATE TIME DEPTr4 NO2 NOJ TOT KJEL NH3N PtiOSOIS PFi0 TO1
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TO1AL OkTHO
To uav FEET MG/L MG/L M&/L MG/L P MG/L
73/05/19 11 05 0.050 0.660 0.011 0.010 0.045
73/06/09 12 30 .i.059 1.100 0.038 u.016 0.U6
7 ,107/Os 11 25 0.270 1.200 0.050 0.O 7 0.U J
li/OB/lI 12 50 J.19d 0.960 0.044 O.uds
73/09/08 12 40 U.6 U 0.820 0.036 I .02 u.U 0
73/10/20 11 45 0.740 0.700 0.018 U.uU7 0.030
73/11/04 12 30 1.92u 0.750 0.032 0.016 u.10J
74/01/OS 15 00 1.180 0.800 (i.072 O.O0S 0.010
74/02/03 13 30 0.910 0.800 0.050 0.O0bt 0.02u
74/02/18 13 30 0.870 O. 00 0.045 0.005Pc 0.030
74/03/02 11 30 1.360 1.200 0. lbO 0.045 d. 10
74/04/20 13 30 0.250 0. ,O0 0.020 o.O lCi U.UIu
K VALUE Kt’ OWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STONET NE1 1EVAL i)ATt 7 /02/ui
‘ . ii’ci
41 3’. 20.0 ubO c 2 15.0
SriENANGO N.(CrWOKLD C )
1.5 HAkTSTOWN
F/PYMATUNIN(, r’eES
E utNCY ki) tft- O(, 1.5 NNL oF dA ISTOwN
11 PALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DE Tr1
0u63 0 00625 Ooo lu 00671 006b5
DATL TIME DEPTH NO NQ3 TOT I JEL NH3-N PpiO5—UIS PHO -EOT
FNOM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL 0 FHO
TO OAY FEET MG/I MG/L MO/I MG/L P MG/L p-
73/05/19 17 00 0.015 0.705 0.006 0.006 0.035
73/06/09 11 20 0.014 0.520 0.02’. 0.OO5rc
73/07/Oo 10 58 3.014 3.7 0 0.022 0.009 0.045
73/08/11 11 20 ( 1.017 5.400 0.113 0.008 0.080
73/39/08 13 30 0.01 0.960 0.018 0.008 0.O4
73/10/20 15 30 0.280 1.080 0.090 0.009 0.060
73/11/04 13 30 0.012 0.950 0.048 0.O05P 0.U ,5
73/12/lb 14 D i) 1.500 0.200 0.016 0.012 0.025
74/01/05 15 30 1.4’.0 0.300 0.040 0.005 c 0.010
7 ’ ./02/03 14 00 0. loO 0.500 0.040 0.005K 0.010
74/02/la 14 00 0.168 0.300 0.035 0.005K 0.020
74/03/02 14 00 0.276 0.400 0.U7u 0.010 0.010
74/04/20 12 (10 0.036 0.900 0.075 0.045 u.08 ,
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THMN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/10
‘+21331
41 37 53.0 u80 b 50.0
‘iATUNING STATE PARK (N SriENAN)
‘ .2 7.5 LINESVLLLE
O/PYMATsJNLNC, SENvOL
I-’Y:4ATUNIt.IG ESEk VO14
11EPAL .S 2141204
0000 FLU DEPTH
J0b30 o06?5 00610 0u611 0 665 buOSi 50053
DATE TIME DEPTrI NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NHJ—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—IOT FLuw CONUU IT
F (OM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OkTrlO RATL FLO —MGU
TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L Mb/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MbD MONTHLY
74/07/27 13 00 45.000 24.000 15.000 6.950
74/08/07 08 30 26.400 15.000 9.500 5.700 b.300 0.010 0.010
74/08/21 08 00 21.000 16.000 4.300 6.300 1.b0 )
74/09/04 08 00 18.500 14.000 5.100 5.500
74/09/18 (18 00 51.500 15.300 10.000 3.800 lu.150
74/10/02 08 00 3a.00 0 5.600 8.600 9. l Ou
74/10/16 08 00 46.000 3.100 0.140 s.650
-------
T0NEF RETRIEVAL DATt. 75/02/10
421341 EA4 1i4i P000615
‘.1 - 30.0 08u 2
t ’MATUNINU STATE t- kIc (W SrIENANG
42 7. L1NLsV1LL
0/L)Y4 iATONjN , LSE VO1r’
Pi’MAIUNIN(, EsERVO1,c
1 IEPALES 21412t)4
4 0000 FtET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02e .N03 TOt KJEL NH3-N PHOS— IS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
F 0M OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL URTHO RATE FLOW—M&1)
TO DAY FEET M( /L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST M(,i) MONTHLY
—73/07/12 11 00
CP(T)— 5.100 3.200 0.040 0.40
73/07/12 15 00
-- -73/u8/lT 11 (JO
CP(T)— 47.000 0.105 0.040 0.040
73/08/17 15 00
--74/05/11 11 00
CP(T)— 19.300 1.000K 0.170 3.600 3.900 0.002 0.002
74/05/11 16 00
—74/07/25 11 00
CP(T)— 67.000 5.500 8.100 8.600 0.044 0.044
74/07/25 15 00
74/08/07 12 00 66.500 2.300 8.100 8. I Ou 0.040
74/08/13 11 00
CP(T)— 67.000 1.700 i.120 7.950 8.800 0.044 0.044
74/08/li 14 30
74/08/21 12 00 21.000 0.800 0.130 8.300 8.700 0.044 0.044
-74/09/04 12 00 57.600 1.000K 0.290 7.600 8.900 0.040
74/09/1’s 12 00 52.000 0.940 0.190 6.900 7.4u0 0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO ET tT 1EVAL DAft 75/02/03
‘+21351 LA421351
‘+1 3 30.0 0 ) 2d ‘+5.0
‘YMATUN1N(., ,TATE PA c (PINE)
42 7.5 LINESVILLE
O/PYMi TUN1N(, ‘EESE (VO1P
I- YMA1UN1N& cESEkVO1I
I 1E MLES
4
P 00 0 4 3 1
2141204
0000 FEEL DEPTrI
u0(30
00625
00610
00671
0ubb
50051
50053
DATE
lIME
DEPTH
NO2i .N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
HOS-1OT
FLOW
CONOU IT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOw—MG()
TO
DAY
FEET
M(,/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L
iNST N,O
MONTHLY
73/07/0’.
11
00
CP(T)—
41.000
0.300
0.05ó
2.200
2.300
0.u2
0.028
73/07/0’.
15
00
73/08/04
11
00
CP(T)—
17.900
0.120
2.600
3.000
0.028
73/08/04
15
00
73/09/03
11
00
CP(T)—
2.240
2.300
0.02w
0.028
73/09/03
15
00
7 ’ +/07/27
13
30
27.600
2.200
0.050
2.400
2.400
74/08/07
09
30
32.000
1.000K
0.120
2.500
2.DO0
0.020
0. 02t)
74/08/21
09
30
21.000
1.000
0.050K
2.900
3.1 0
74/09/04
09
30
19.2u0
0.500K
0.u SO
1.500
1.600
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATE(.’
-------
ST0 ET ET 1EVAL DATL 75/02/03
4d13(,M A54213(,A
41 39 18.0 080 25 15.0
LINESVILLE MUNICPAL AUTHO ITY
4. 7.5 EAST G L, iVI
T/f YMAJUNINi., SENVO1
LINLSVILLE CREEr(
UE ALES 214120’.
0000 FEET
00630 00625
N02a.N03 TOT KJEL
N—TOTAL N
MG/L MG/L
OuboS 50051
PHOS—TOT FLOW
ATL
MG/L r INST M )
5 00 s3
CONL)(J1 t
FLOw—MGD
MONT r4LY
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
DAT
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTM
OF
DAY FEET
44
0u610
NH3-N
TOT AL
P001200
L)E TM
73/06/18 13 15
73/07/18 10 30
73/08/20 10 00
73/09/19 10 30
73/10/19 10 30
73/11/19 10 30
73/12/19 13 00
74/01/18 10 30
74/02/18 10 30
74/03/18 10 00
74/04/25 09 30
74/05/23 10 00
74/06/25 10 00
5.3u0
17.400
9 • 400
0.198
4.300
2. 8 U
4.500
2.240
1.040
o .200
1.440
2 • ‘.00
00671
Pr1OSDIS
O THU
MG/L P
6. 76
9.400
9.300
8.240
so
4.950
5.520
4.900
4.800
2.800
3.100
4.100
7.100
6.800 0.017
0.100K 0.074
0.154
0.750 0.060
6.200 0.053
1.200 0.062
1.800 0.150
3.200 0.430
5.400 0.’.10
2.700 0.280
7.200 0.2o 0
10.000 u.050K
3.800 u.00SK
I.eQQ
10.000
9•4 O
8.800
6.550
5. 100
5.900
5.000
• 450
3.100
3.b OO
‘4.900
7.IbQO
0 • 1 39
).u98
0 .0’ 4
U .081
0 .u90
0.139
0.119
0 • 1 70
0.124
o • 227
0. 1’40
U • 119
0.100
0. 168
0.107
0. 09d
0.090
0.100
0.133
0.107
C i • 1 30
0.148
0.209
0.200
U .200
0.900
------- |