U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•fcOPO 697.O32
-------
REPORT
ON
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
I€RCER COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 426
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Maps v, vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 10
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration comitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ 1O6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivarlate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to the
Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James 1. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Allegheny Reservoir McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattaraugus, NY
Beaver Run Reservoir Westmoreland
Beltzville Carbon
Blanchard Reservoir Centre
Canadohta Crawford
Conneaut Crawford
Conewago (Pinchot) York
Greenl ane Montgomery
Harveys Luzerne
Indian Somerset
Naomi Monroe
Ontelaunee Berks
Pocono Monroe
Pymatuning Reservoir Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Shenango River Reservoir Mercer
Stillwater Monroe
Wallenpaupack Pike, Wayne
-------
Th
nn. 3
Flap Location
)
SHENANGO RIVER
RESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling
Lake Sampling Site
Land Subject To Inundation
Kin.
-------
vi
Map Location
Orai
SHENANGO RIVER
RESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Land Subject To Inundation
1o j .
Pymetuning
Reservoir
esvifIe
£
Lake
6 Mi.
-------
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR*
STORET NO. 4216
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Shenango River Reservoir is eu-
trophic. It ranked fourteenth in overall trophic quality when
the 17 Pennsylvania lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using
a combination of six lake parameters**. Thirteen of the lakes
had less median total phosphorus, 11 had less and two had the
same median dissolved phosphorus, nine had less median inorganic
nitrogen, 15 had less mean chlorophyll a, and 14 had greater
mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked depression of dissolved
oxygen with depth occurred at sampling stations 1 and 2 in
July, 1973.
Survey limnologists noted algae over much of the reservoir
surface in July, but no macrophytes were observed during any of
the sampling visits.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that the reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the sample was collected
(04/20/73). The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at
the other sampling times as well.
* Table of metric conversions--Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
2
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources-—The phosphorus contribution of the
listed point sources amounted to almost 38% of the total
reaching Shenango River Reservoir during the sampling year;
including Greenville (26.3%), Reynolds Heights (5.9%), Westing-
house Electric (2.4%), and Jamestown (1.7%). The six remaining
listed point sources collectively contributed a total of 1.3%.
The present phosphorus loading rate of 3.92 g/m 2 /yr is
three times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and
Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic rate (see page 16). For this
reason, all phosphorus inputs to Shenango River Reservoir, as
well as upstream Pymatuning Reservoir, should be minimized to
the greatest practicable extent to slow the aging of this
reservoir (nearly 14% of the total phosphorus load to
Shenango River Reservoir was contributed by the outlet of
Pymatuning Reservoir*).
2. Non-point sources--Over 62% of the total phosphorus
input to Shenango River Reservoir came from non—point sources
during the sampling year. The Shenango River contributed 39.6%
of the total (after accounting for nine point sources); Pyma-
tuning Creek, 18.7%; and Lackawannock Creek, 1.2%. The six
remaining gaged tributaries collectively accounted for 1.8%
* See Working Paper No. 425, “Report on Pymatuning Reservoir”.
-------
3
of the total. Ungaged tributaries were estimated to have
contributed 0.6%.
Brush Run, Lackawannock Creek, and Pymatuning Creek had
phosphorus export rates of 36, 30, and 27 kg/km 2 /yr, respec-
tively (see page 15). These rates are considerably higher
than those of the other unimpacted tributaries of the reser-
voir and may be due to unidentified point sources rather than
to non—point source inputs.
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryt:
1. Surface area: 14.41 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 2.5 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 10.7 meters.
4. Volume: 36.025 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 21 days (based on outlet flow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km 2 )* ( m 3 /sec)*
Shenango River 929.8 12.0
Pymatuning Creek 385.9 3.2
Booth Run 27.2 0.2
Brush Run 14.2 0.1
Lackawannock Creek 23.3 0.2
Daley Run 8.1 0.1
Magargee Run 23.5 0.1
Golden Run 11.7 0.1
Pine Hollow Run 11.3 0.1
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage — 63.2 0.9
Totals 1,498.2 17.0
2. Outlet -
Shenango River 1,512.6** 20.0
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods,
1973-1976”.
** Includes area of lake.
-------
5
C. Precipitation*:
1. Year of sampling: 89.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 89.8 centimeters.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
6
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Shenango River Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from three stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 6.1 meters at station 1, 8.8 meters at station 2,
and 4.0 meters at station 3.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix 0 and
are sumarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/20/73)
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FO SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 4216
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/31/73) 3RD SAMPLING (10/ 8/73)
3 SITES 3 SITES 3 SITES
PARAMETER
I AN6 E
MEAN
MEUIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
(AN(,L
MEAN
MEDIAN
TEMP (C)
10.2
— 86.0
33.5
14.0
23.6
— 25.6
24.8
24.7
18.0
— 18.3
18.2
18.2
0155 OAY (MG/L)
9.9
— 15.5
12.6
12.8
0.5
— 7.4
5.0
5.4
6.2
— 8.8
7.3
o.8
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
180.
— 385.
230.
213.
198.
— 1S.
206.
206.
177.
— 212.
191.
191.
PH (STAND UNITS)
7.?
— 13.5
9.3
8.6
6.4
— 8.0
7.0
6.8
7•4
— 7.9
7.6
7.6
TOT ALK (MG/L)
32.
— 44.
36.
36.
60.
— 68.
62.
61.
55.
— 75.
62.
61.
TOT P (MG/L)
0.023
— 0.065
0.037
0.029
0.047
— 0.096
0.064
0.058
0.049
— 0.112
0.077
0.Ob’.
ORTHO P (MG/L)
0.004
— 0.011
0.007
0.007
0.006
— 0.014
0.009
0.008
0.005
— 0.013
0.008
0.007
N02.NO3 (MG/L)
0.340
— 0.600
0.459
0.435
0.040
— 0.080
0.056
0.050
0.040
— 0.290
0.191
0.240
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.030
— 0.060
0.043
0.040
0.060
— 0.720
0.188
0.105
0.030
— 0.200
0.083
0.070
KJEL N (MG/L)
0.400
— 0.600
0.480
0.450
0.600
— 1.400
0.980
0.950
0.700
— 1.600
1.029
1.000
INORG N (MG/U
0.370
— 0.660
0.502
0.470
0.110
— 0.760
0.244
0.160
0.130
— 0.360
0.274
0.320
TOTAL N (MG/U
0.810
— 1.100
0.939
0.945
0.660
— 1.440
1.036
1.000
0.990
— 1.650
1.220
1.240
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
9.7
— 13.9
12.2
12.9
22.3
— 7.5
45.0
55.3
13.8
— 36.3
23.2
19.5
SECCHI (METERS)
0.9
— 0.9
0.9
0.9
0.6
— 0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
— 1.2
1.0
—4
-------
8
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton* -
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
04/20/73 1. Melosira 1,706
2. Asterionella 1,389
3. Flagellates 198
4. Ankistrodesmus 99
5. Synedra 79
Other genera 120
Total 3,591
07/31/73 1. Anabaena 2,071
2. Aphanizomenon (?) 323
3. Stephanodiscus 323
4. Melosira 296
5. Flagellates 215
Other genera 885
Total 4,113
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/i )
04/20/73 01 12.9
02 9.7
03 13.9
07/31/73 01 57.5
02 22.3
03 55.3
10/08/73 01 36.3
02 13.8
03 19.5
* The October sample was lost in shipment.
-------
9
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked —
Ortho P Inorganic N
Spike (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i )
Control 0.020 0.514
0.050 P 0.070 0.514
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.070 1.514
1.0 N 0.020 1.514
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
5.7
15.0
23. 3
4.7
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri—
cornutum , indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Shenango River Reservoir was high at the time the sample
was collected. The addition of phosphorus alone produced a
significant increase in yield, but no such increase occurred
with the addition of only nitrogen. This indicates limita-
tion by phosphorus.
The lake data further substantiate phosphorus limitation.
At all sampling times, the mean N/P ratios were 27/1 or
greater.
-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the
high runoff months of February and April when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point—source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled “minor tributaries and imediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /year, at stations C-l, F—i, G—l, and H-i
and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
The operators of the Greenville, Reynolds Heights, Westinghouse
Electric Corp., Jamestown, Greenville Tubes Division, Commodore Perry
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
School District, R.D. Werner Co., Inc., and Anderson’s Mobile Home
Park wastewater treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples
and corresponding flow data. St. Paul ‘s Home did not participate in
the Survey, and nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401
kg N/capita/year.
Estimates of nutrient contributions by wild ducks and geese were
based on the following numbers of waterfowl using Shenango River
Reservoir as provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources (Ulanoski, 1975).
Summer resident ducks 250
Summer resident geese 50
Migratory ducks 2,000
Migratory geese 300
In calculating the nutrient loads, the following assumptions were
made:
1. Each wild duck contributes 0.45 kg total nitrogen and
0.20 kg total phosphorus per year (Paloumpis and Starrett,
1960).
2. Each wild goose contributes the same amount as one duck
since geese typically feed in fields away from the lake
several hours each day.
3. Summer or winter resident waterfowl are at the lake for
six months of the year.
4. Migratory waterfowl spend a total of one month per year
at the lake; i.e., 15 days during Spring migration and 15
days during Fall migration.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources*:
1. Known muncipal -
Anderson ‘s
Mobile Home
Park
Commodore
Perry Sch.
District
Reynolds
Heights
Greenville
St. Paul’s Old
Folk’s Home
2. Known industrial -
R. D.
Werner
Company
Greenville
Tubes
Division
Westi ng-
house
Electric
aluminum
products
94 lagoon
1,088 act. sludge
5,859** trickling
filter
10,000 trickling
filter
70 lagoon
960 act. sludge
stainless
steel tubing
electrical
equi pment
lime neutral.
& sedimentation
Little Shenango
River
Shenango River
Shenango River
Shenango River
Shenango River
* Treatment punt questionnaires.
** Estimate based on flow of 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
Pop.
Name Served Treatment
Mean Flow
(m 3 /d)
Receiving
Water
14.2 Big Run
Jamestown
17.8
2,217.6
5,874.1
37.8
613.2
Mean flow
(m 3 /d)
362.0
Name
Product
Treatment
none
none
Recei ving
Water
Little Shenango
River
1,682.4 Big Run
36. 7
Shenango River
-------
13
Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Shenango River 22,345 39.5
Pymatuning Creek 10,545 18.6
Booth Run 80 0.1
Brush Run 505 0.9
Lackawannock Creek 690 1.2
Daley Run 70 0.1
Magargee Run 110 0.2
Golden Run 60 0.1
Pine Hollow Run 200 0.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 350 0.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Anderson's Mobile Home Park 25 <0.1
Commodore Perry Sen. Dist. 45 0.1
Reynolds Heights 3,315 5.9
Greenville 14,865 26.3
St. Paul's Old Folks Home 80 0.1
Jamestown 965 1.7
d. Septic tanks* - 5 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
R. D. Werner Company 120 0.2
Greenville Tubes Division 495 0.9
Westinghouse Electric 1,360 2.4
f. Wild ducks and geese - 70 0.1
g. Direct precipitation** - 250 0.4
Total 56,550 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Shenango River 42,060
3. Net annual P accumulation - 14,490 kg.
* Estimate based on two lakeshore parks; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load)
Shenango River 486,915 64.1
Pymatuning Creek 154,155 20.3
Booth Run 7,020 0.9
Brush Run 3,510 0.5
Lackawannock Creek 9,320 1.2
Daley Run 4,015 0.5
Magargee Run 6,645 0.9
Golden Run 2,940 0.4
Pine Hollow Run 2,175 0.3
b. Minor tributaries & irraiiedlate
drainage (non-point load) - 20,350 2.7
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Anderson’s Mobile Home Park 45 <0.1
Comodore Perry Sch. Dist. 135 <0.1
Reynolds Heights 8,345 1.1
Greenville 31,545 4.1
St. Paul’s Old Folks Home 240 <0.1
Jamestown 2,070 0.3
d. Septic tanks* - 70 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
R. D. Werner Company 235 <0.1
Greenville Tubes Division 2,750 0.4
Westinghouse Electric 2,005 0.3
f. Wild ducks and geese - 155 <0.1
g. Direct precipitation** - 15,555 2.0
Total 760,195 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet - Shenango River 894,835
3. Net annual N loss - 134,640 kg.
* Estimate based on two lakeshore parks; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
Shenango River 24 524
Pymatuning Creek 27 399
Booth Run 3 258
Brush Run 36 247
Lackawannock Creek 30 400
Daley Run 9 496
Magargee Run 5 283
Golden Run 5 251
Pine Hollow Run 18 192
-------
16
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
welder and Dillon, 1974).
Essentially, his “dangerous” rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutro-
phic or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” rate is that
which would result in the receiving water remaining oligo-
trophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted.
A mesotrophic rate would be considered one between “dangerous”
and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This
may have been due to nitrogen fixation in the reservoir, solubilization
of previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground
water, unknown and unsampled point sources discharging directly to the
reservoir, or underestimation of the nitrogen loads from the listed
point sources. Whatever the cause, a similar nitrogen loss had occurred
at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which has been intensively studied by EPA’s
National Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch (Malueg et al., 1975).
Total Phosphorus
- - Accumulated
Total
grams/m 2 /yr 3.92 1.01
52.8
loss*
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Shenango River
Reservoir:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 1 .26
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.63
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj.
#16010 EHR, Washington, DC.
Malueg, Kenneth W., 0. Phillips Larsen, Donald W. Schultz, and
Howard 1. Mercier; 1975. A six-year water, phosphorus, and
nitrogen budget for Shagawa Lake, Minnesota. Jour. Environ.
Qual., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 236-242.
Paloumpis, A. A., and W. C. Starrett, 1960. An ecological study
of benthic organisms in three Illinois River flood plain
lakes. Amer. Midl. Nat., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 406-435.
Ulanoski, James, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry;
waterfowl numbers). PA Dept. Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 1O = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED B ’ INDEX NOS.
WAN1( LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4224 LAKE NAOMI 445
2 ‘20 BELTZVILLE DAM 423
3 4222 HARVEY’S LAKE 413
4 4228 STILLWATER LAKE 401
5 4227 POCONO LAKE 389
6 4223 INDIAN LAKE 388
7 3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR 385
8 4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK 371
9 4221 CANADOHTA LAKE 369
10 4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR 360
11 4204 CONNEAUT LAKE 307
12 4226 PINCHOT LAKE 256
13 4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR 206
14 4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR 157
15 4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM 101
16 4201 BLANCI-iARD RESERVOIR 85
17 4207 GREENLANE DAM 53
-------
Pt RCENT OF LAKES WITH hIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES wITH HIGHEk VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEX
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORD N MEAN SEC CHLORA MIN DO DISS P NO
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR 56 ( 9) 38 C 6) 63 ( 10) 100 ( 16) 69 C 11) 59 C 8) 385
4201 BLANCHARO RESERVOIR 13 ( 2) 13 C 2) 25 C 4) 31 ( 5) 3 ( 0) 0 C 0) 85
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE 44 C 7) 63 C 10) 69 ( 11) 56 C 9) 34 C 5) 41 C 6) 307
4207 GREENLANE DAM 6 ( 1) 6 C 1) 19 C 3) 13 ( 2) 3 ( 0) 6 C 1) 53
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR 0 ( 0) 72 C 11) 6 C 1) 0 C 0) 100 C 16) 28 C 4) 206
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR 19 C 3) 44 C 7) 13 C 2) 6 ( 1) 47 C 7) 28 C 4) 17
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERvOIR 94 ( 15) 19 ( 3) 88 C 14) 81 C 13) 19 ( 2) 59 ( 8) 360
4220 BELTZVILLE DAM 88 ( 14) 25 C 4) 94 C 15) 94 C 15) 34 C 5) 88 ( 13) 423
4221 CANADOHTA LAKE 50 ( 8) 97 ( 15) 56 C 9) 19 C 3) 59 C 9) 88 C 13) 369
4222 HARVEY’S LAKE 63 ( 10) 81 ( 13) 100 C 16) 63 C 10) 47 C 7) 59 C 8) 413
4223 INDIAN LAKE 100 ( 16) 31 C 5) 75 C 12) 75 ( 12) 19 C 2) 88 ( 13) 388
4224 LAKE NAOMI 81 C 13) 88 C 14) 44 C 7) 69 C 11) 88 14) 75 ( 12) 445
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM 25 ( 4) 0 C 0) 0 ( 0) 44 C 7) 19 C 2) 13 ( 2) 101
4226 PINCHOT LAKE 31 ( 5) 56 C 9) 31 C 5) 38 ( 6) 81 C 13) 19 C 3) 256
4227 POCONO LAKE 38 C 6) 97 C 15) 50 C 8) 88 C 14) 75 C 12) 41 C 6) 3 9
4228 STILLWATER LAKE 72 C 11) 72 C 11) 38 C 6) 25 ( 4) 94 ( 15) 100 C 16) 401
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK 72 C 11) 50 C 8) 81 ( 13) 50 ( 8) 59 C 9) 59 ( 8) 37 1
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INO G N MEAN SEC CHLORA MIN DO DISS P
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR 0.016 0.380 414.250 3.700 13.800 0.006
4201 BLANCHARD RESERVOIR 0.064 1.300 453.163 15.187 14.900 0.046
4204 CUNNEAUT LAKE 0.023 0,185 402.000 7.567 14.600 0.007
4207 GREENLANE DAM 0.066 1.475 460.222 24.011 14.900 0.020
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR 0.070 0.180 467.750 56.333 7.700 0.008
4216 SMENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR 0.058 0.340 663.S55 26.800 14.500 0.008
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR 0.009 0.835 384.833 5.183 14.800 0.006
4220 BELTZVILLE DAM 0.010 0.815 362.444 4.856 14.600 0.005
4221 CANAOOHTA LAKE 0.020 0.130 436.000 19.167 14.100 0.005
4222 HARVEY’S LAKE 0.015 0.160 338.000 5.967 14.500 0.006
4223 INDIAN LAKE 0.008 0.520 400.222 5.211 14.800 0.005
4224 LAKE NAOMI 0.014 0.135 443.333 5.533 8.000 0.005
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM 0.040 2.150 470.667 11.783 14.800 0.011
4226 PINCHOT LAKE 0.027 0.245 453.000 13.950 11.500 0.008
4227 POCONO LAKE 0.024 0.130 438.800 4.980 13.200 0.007
4228 STILLWATER LAKE 0.015 0.180 449.000 18.233 7.900 0.004
6229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK 0.015 0.250 394.583 9.617 14.100 0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIbUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR PENNSYLVANIA 1/27/75
LAKE CODE 42)6 SHENANGO RIVER RES
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 1512.6
SU8—ORAINAG NO. MAL1ZED FLOWS (CMS)
TRIBUTARY AR(A(SQ 1cM) JAN FEll MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
4216A 1 1512.6 27.3 33.50 41.14 31.12 21.41 12.80 11.52 9.34 8.47 9.40 13.42 21.27 19.99
4216A2 929.8 16.99 15.69 22.60 20.64 11.89 8.21 6.99 5.35 7.67 6.97 7.56 13.62 12.01
421681 385.9 3.31 5.97 9.57 6.46 3.40 1.76 0.99 0.27 0.25 0.82 1.98 3.60 3.18
4216C 1 27.2 0.34 0.37 0.62 0.37 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.20 0.19
421601 14.2 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.06
42 16E1 23.3 0.28 0.37 0.40 0.48 0.40 0.27 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.11 0.20 0.24
4216F1 8.1 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.06
421661 23.5 0.21 0.23 0.31 0.23 0.14 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.13
4216111 11.7 0.10 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.06
4216J1 11.3 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.06
42162Z 77.4 1.16 1.25 1.84 1.56 0.88 0.57 0.45 0.31 0.42 0.42 0.54 0.96 0.86
50MM AR y
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 1512.6 TOTAL FLOW IN = 202.79
SUM OF SOB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 1512.5 TOTAL. FLOW OUT = 240.75
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4216A1 5 73 37.66 19 41.91
6 73 26.87 9 51.25
7 73 7.50 14 7.50
8 73 7.50 11 7.58
9 73 8.04 15 8.21
10 73 9.80 13 10.48
Il 73 17.10 17 16.14
12 73 28.32 16 14.44
1 74 47.29 12 20.18
2 74 41.63 9 41.06
3 74 39.93 9 53.80
4 74 36.53 13 45.59
4216A2 5 73 22.85 19 18.09
6 73 14.19 9 20.81
7 73 4.11 14 3.23
8 73 4.73 11 3.43
9 73 5.30 15 5.21
10 73 6.80 13 5.89
11 73 10.79 17 9.29
12 73 16.17 16 11.50
I 74 26.45 12 13.62
2 74 20.59 9 19.62
3 74 26.08 9 72.77
4 74 23.59 13 23.53
-------
T 18UTA Y FLOW 1NfO iMAT1ON FOR ENNSYLVAN1A 1/27/75
LANE CODE 4216 SMENANGO RIVER RES
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS(CHS)
TRI8UTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
421681 5 73 6.65 19 2.18
6 73 3.99 9 6.48
7 73 O.’ .9 1’. v.18
8 73 0.29 11 0.09
9 73 0.13 15 0.15
10 73 0.55 13 0.20
11 73 2.61 17 1.36
12 73 5.64 16 4.16
1 7’. 6.54 12 0.79
2 7’. 2.89 9 1.13
3 74 9.97 9 21.0’.
4 74 6.63 13 5.72
4216C1 5 73 0.37 19 0.07
6 73 0.14 9 0.12
7 73 0.02 14 0.03
8 73 0.02 11 0.00
9 73 0.00 15 0.00
10 73 0.02 13 0.02
11 73 0.10 17 0.25
12 73 0.31 16 0.04
1 7’. 0.59 12 0.08
2 74 0.16 9 0.14
3 74 1.19 9 0.31
4 74 0.48 13 0.15
421601 5 73 0.11 19 0.04
6 73 0.06 9 u.05
7 73 0.02 14 0.02
8 73 0.02 11 0.01
9 73 0.01 15 0.01
10 73 0.02 13 0.02
11 73 0.05 17 0.08
12 73 0.10 16 0.03
1 74 0.14 12 0.04
2 7 ’ . 0.06 9 0.06
3 7’. 0.22 9 (p.09
4 7’. 0.12 13 0.06
4216E1 5 73 0.40 19 0.18
6 73 0.25 9 0.23
7 73 0.10 14 0.13
8 73 0.10 11 0.0’.
9 73 0.05 15 0.O
10 73 0.09 13 0.10
11 73 0.21 17 0.31
12 73 0.37 16 0. 14
1 74 0.48 12 0.19
2 74 0.26 9 0.25
3 74 0.65 9 0.3’.
4 74 0.42 13 0.25
-------
TRIbUTAMY FLOW INFONMATION FOR I)ENNSYLWANIA 1/27/75
LAME CODE 4216 SHENANC,O RIVtR RES
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOIS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW UAY FLUW
4216F1 S 73 0.10 19 0.03
6 73 0.05 9 0.05
7 73 0.01 14 0.02
8 73 0.01 11 0.00
9 73 0.00 15 0.00
10 73 0.01 13 0.01
11 73 0.04 17 0.08
12 73 0.09 16 0.02
1 74 0.14 12 0.03
2 74 0.06 9 O.GS
3 74 0.24 9 0.09
4 74 0.12 13 0.06
421601 5 73 0.23 19 0.07
6 73 0.12 9 0.10
7 73 0.03 14 0.05
8 73 0.03 11 0.01
9 73 0.01 15 0.01
ii 73 0.03 13 0.03
ii 73 0.09 17 0.17
12 73 0.20 16 0.0 5
1 74 0.31 12 0.0
2 74 0.13 9 0.12
3 74 0.51 9 0.20
4 74 0.27 13 0.12
42l l1 5 73 0.11 19 0.02
6 73 0.05 9 0.04
7 73 0.01 14 0.01
8 73 0.01 11 0.00
9 73 0.00 15 0.00
10 73 0.01 13 0.01
11 73 0.03 17
12 73 0.09 16 0.02
1 74 0.16 12 0.03
2 74 0.05 9 0.05
3 74 0.31 9 0.09
4 74 0.14 13 0.05
4216JI 5 73 0.11 19 0.03
6 73 0.05 9 0.05
7 73 0.01 1’. 0.02
8 73 0.01 11 0.00
9 73 0.00 15 0.00
10 73 0.01 13 0.01
11 73 0.04 17 0.u
12 73 u.I0 1 0.02
1 74 0.15 12 0.03
2 74 0.06 9 0.05
3 74 0.25 9
4 74 0.12 13 0.06
-------
EkIb(JTAkY FLOW I O MA1Iu FUP NNSYLVA iA
1/27/lb
LAKE COOL ‘+216
. 1LJ’1Ar1Gu FUVER ES
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRI UTA Y
‘.2 16ZZ
MONEP-4
rEA
lEAN FLOw
DAY
t-LOw OAY FLOW UA
5
73
1.67
19
1.13
6
Ti
1. 2
9
1. U
7
73
0.26
14
LJ.?0
8
13
0.28
11
i.i
9
ii
0.28
15
0.2
10
73
0.’+0
13
0.34
11
73
0.76
1(
0.62
12
73
1.25
16
U.H 5
I
/‘..
1. 0
12
0.79
2
1 ’.
1.30
9
1. lb
3
/L+
2.12
9
b.13
4
7 ’+
1.73
13
1.61
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STO t.1 WE1kIE\IAL DATE 7S/01/27
0u665 32217
DEPTH PHOS—TOT Ci-ILRPHYL
A
M(,/L P UG/L
73/04/20 16 15 0000
16 15 0004
16 15 0008
73/07/31 10 30 0000
10 30 OOuS
10 30 0020
7j/lu/08 09 25 0000
09 25 0014
0.029
3.065
o .025
0.080
0 .080
0.096
0.112
• 1 lu
421a 01
‘.1 17 12.0 080 25 46.0
S’-IE’ AN(,0 H1VE c SE VO1
‘. ?t)d5 PENNSYLVANIA
1 1EPALES
3
2111202
0012 FEET OtPTr4
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TI.’4E
DEPTH
WATEP
00
TNANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
1 ALK
NH3-N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
FWOM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FiELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTHO
10
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
M1CROMHO
SU
HG/L
M0/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
73/04/20
16 15 0000
14.
36
190
8.80
36
0.040
0.400
0.410
0.004
16 15 000’.
14.2
13.6
190
ts.BU
35
0.030
0.400
0.420
0.011
16 15 0008
13.8
13.5
240
8.60
35
0.040
0.400
0.450
0.008
73/07/31
10 30 0000
25.0
25
214
8.00
60
0.070
1.200
0.050
0.012
10 30 0005
24.7
7.4
213
7.40
60
0.060
1.000
0.050
0.008
10 30 0020
24.3
3.4
215
6.90
64
0.330
1.300
0.080
0.010
73/10/08
09 25 0000
18.0
8.8
28
177
7.7u
55
0.100
1.600
0.050
0.012
09 25 0014
18.1
8.2
177
7.90
55
0.0 0
1.000
0.040
0.013
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME
OF
DAY FEET
12.9
57.5
36.3
-------
STORET NETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
421602
41 16 06.0 080 27 33.0
SPIENANGO RIVEN RESERVOIR
42O 35 PENNSYLVANIA
l1EPALES 2111202
3 0029 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 0 0 41u 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNOLJCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N02 NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT P46/L INCHES MICROP4HO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/04/20 16 40 0000 11.4 35 385 8.30 38 0.040 0.400 Q.510 0.007
16 40 0008 10.5 10.4 180 7.90 33 0.050 0.400 0.560 0.008
16 40 0015 10.4 10.2 200 8.40 32 0.060 0.500 0.590 0.007
16 40 0029 10.2 9.9 250 8.10 33 0.060 0.500 0.600 0.006
73/07/31 10 05 00I 24.7 36 198 6.60 60 0.120 0.900 0.050 0.006
10 05 0005 - 24.6 5.4 198 6.60 60 0.160 0.700 0.050 0.008
10 05 0015 24.5 4.4 199 6.60 60 0.190 0.800 0.050 0.010
10 05 0025 23.6 0.5 207 6.40 68 0.720 1.400 0.040 0.014
73/10/08 09 55 0000 18.3 8.8 48 193 7.70 61 0.040 1.000 0.290 0.007
09 55 0015 18.2 8.6 191 7.60 61 0.030 0.700 0.290 0.005
09 55 0026 18.2 6.2 191 7.50 62 0.070 0.800 0.290 0.005
01645 3Z217
DATE TINE DEPTH P+IOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET NG/L P UG/L
73/04/20 16 40 0000 0.023 9.7
16 40 0008 0.023
16 40 0015 0.028
16 40 0029 0.030
73/07/31 10 05 0000 0.048 22.3
10 05 0005 0.047
10 05 0015 0.049
10 05 0025 0.070
73/10/08 09 55 0000 0.061 13.8
09 55 0015 0.062
09 55 0026 0.064
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
73/04/20 17 10 0000
17 10 0004
— 17 10 0011
73/07/31 09 35 0000
09 35 0005
09 35 0010
7j/10/08 10 15 0000
10 15 0013
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CHLPPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.060
0.05a
0.0 36
0.058
0.058
0 • 056
0.049
0.082
421603
41 18 31.0 080 28 21.0
SrItNANC,O LVEN €StRV0jR
42085 I-’ENNSYLVANIA
1 1tYALLS
3
2111202
0015 FEET DEPTH
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/04/20
17 10
17 10
17 10
0000
0004
0011
73/07/31
09 35
09 35
09 35
0000
0005
0010
73/10/08
10 15
10 15
0000
0013
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
U0u10
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
wATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
P 1 - i
T uLK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
NO2e ,NO3
PI-iOS-OIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMMO
SU
MG/L
M ulL
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
82.0
15.5
37
225
37
0.0’.0
0.600
0.360
0.007
82.0
15.0
195
13. 0
37
0.030
0.600
0.340
0.007
86.0
12.2
240
10.90
44
0.040
0.600
0.350
0.010
25.6
35
205
7.30
62
0.070
1.200
0.060
0.008
25.5
7.0
204
7.10
61
0.070
0.700
0.070
0.008
25.5
6.7
206
6.70
63
0.090
0.600
0.060
0.008
18.3
8.2
48
196
7. Su
64
0. OSu
1.000
0.240
0.006
18.0
6.4
212
7.40
75
0.200
1.100
0.140
0.007
13.9
55 • 3
19.5
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STtJNt..T (E.1rcIj VAL DATE 7 ,/02/03
4 I6AL
‘.1 1 03.0 080 28 13.0
rft.NMN&O <1V p
4 )39 l. 5rIAP SV1LLL
0/SHENANGO LVL r t
,t.t rft) tjkij(, II’d Nt. Sr1A SVILLL
11L ALES I11 u’.
4 u000 FEET DEr Tri
Ot.,e3u 00625 uOb lU th)b71 0C66
DATE TiME DEPTH NO ? NO3 TOT KJEL NHJ—N hOS—DIS PHOS—IJT
FROM OF • —TUTAL JOTAL OHTHO
TO DAY Ft.ET M(i/L M ,/L M,/L MU/L P
13/09/19 09 05 0.132 0.750 0.012 0.008 0.055
7j/Jb/16 19 30 0.33b 1.000 3.160 0.016 0.05
73/jill? 20 oO t). luO 1.2u0 0.220 0.015
73/u8/l 1? 05 0.090 0.840 0.142 9.010 0.060
7 i/U 9 /l 11 00 0.076 1.76u 0.147 0.00’ ,. 0.055
73/lu/li 1 ’. 15 0.260 0.650 0.046 0.012 0.uSO
l i/ IL/I T M 13 45 0.232 0.700 u.1D 0.008 0.U 0
73/12/It 1’. 15 o.6i0 0.600 0.076 0.016 0.045
74/01/li 11 35 0.940 0.100 u.1l ? 0.020 0.060
74/th /OY 10 ‘+5 0.672 0.900 3.130 0.010 0.050
74/02/2’. 1’. 15 0.700 0.900 0.145 3.020 0.123
74/03/23 10 45 .i.82U 1.100 3.075 0.01 0.070
?4/o4/10 09 4 0.792 1.200 v.1i O 0.015 0.119
74/04/21 15 25 0.5 U 1.100 0.030 o.u O S,c 0.060
K VALUE K IOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
k21bA2
‘41 17 13.0 080 19 1S.0
Sr$tj’ ANGO I LVEP
42 1.5 F’ DOt iA
1/Sr1r.N Ni ,0 IVtR LS
r U ‘.30M2 8 PL ., AT dI’j
I 1E ALES
d t. N.
l 1 12u
0000 FF .T
DE P TM
0063u
00625
00610
00671
O Obb’
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO &NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PrIOS—DIS
I-’hOS-TOT
FNOM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
IQIAL
URTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
M(,/L ‘-‘
73/05/19
10
45
0.450
1.300
0.012
0.035
0.080
73/06/16
09
50
0. Ssu
0.150
0.039
0.044
0.105
l,.s/L)7/12
19
30
0.450
0.78u
0.023
0.064
0.130
73/U8/1
10
15
u.220
0.290
.0J8
0.018
0.195
73/09/15
10
20
0.1 t3
0.860
0.046
0.060
0.18u
73/10/13
13
50
0.270
0.950
0.0b4
0.090
u. Ou
73/11/18
13
45
C.35i)
1.100
0.07
0.072
0.130
7i/12/16
14
10
u.7 ’+0
1.100
0.084
0.040
74/ji/li
ii
30
0.520
0.500
0.15
0.032
0.085
74/32/09
1’.
25
0.510
1.400
0.175
0.015
0.055
74/02/23
14
25
0.630
1.100
0.100
0.010
0.077
74/03/10
09
50
1.105
0.700
0.115
0.020
0.165
74/03/23
13
45
0.7 ’.tJ
0.600
0.C ,80
0.030
0.075
74/u ’./21
14
20
0.410
1.100
0.03
0.010
0.035
-------
sFu i E1 IFVAL L)AIL 75/02/oi
‘e/1 b!1 1
‘+1 2 j ?5.t) j ii
PY. 1uNI’ C Q Lrc
iLrCEr C(. —i Y - A
1/-,rILNAi’ ,u r LVE S
r wY 7j i dt U(, JJ PA -Oh iOr jj .p
11C)- 4LE5 111du’+
4 0000 r_Lt DEPT-I
0t)63 00b25 00610 00571
UA L T1M D TPTri O? .NO3 TOT cJEL Nrij-N I-’r1US—Lj1’ riOS—TU1
Ft UM OF N—1OT, L N TOFAL
TO L)AY FLET Mi/L ‘1&/L Mc.,/L ‘s(.,/L MulL
73/uS/19 1? 14 u. lbO 0.TdU 0.072 0.050
73/(jb/1 10 00 U.1’+0 1. ,00 0.231 0.lb()
13/I/I? 1940 0.013 1.100 u.017 0.020 0.080
7j/u j/I 10 05 0.025 0.943 u.u27 0.030
7j/U /1S 10 ‘ 5 0.01 1.540 0.054 u.O . 0.U9o
lj/ 0/13 14 00 0. 12s 1.230 u.027 o.02
74/11i’JM 14 00 u.380 0.’ Q0 0.050 0.076
7s/1 /16 14 20 l. lao 0.900 0.072 u.044
74/01/13 12 00 1.0u0 0.500 0.048 0.104 u.195
74/02/10 11 00 1. ltiU 0.R00 0.06o 0.o3 0 O.u 5
7. 102/24 14 45 1.090 1.100 0.115 ( .02S 0. 09u
74/03/23 09 55 ,.672 0.700 0.047 u.0 0 0.057
74/04/10 10 00 0.690 1.100 Cj. b5 u. 02 5 O. 09u
74/04/21 15 00 0.140 1.uOO 3.035 0. 03u u.01,
-------
STO ET €T lLVAL DATE. 75/02/ )3
4216C1
41 20 50.0 iThu 31 uO.0
bUUTt-i kUN
42 r1E CE CU H Y MA
T/SriEI’ ANGO 1VLN t.5
1) 43037 t UG AT N . COkNL OF ORANI’LVILL
1 IEPALES d li l2u ’.
‘I 0000 FEt F DEr I i
(sub3 O 00o25 0u610 00b71 006b5
DATE. TIME DEPTrI NOd NU3 TOT KJEL Nh3—N PHOS-DIS Pr$OS—IUT
FROM OF u—TOTAL N TUEAL o rMo
Fu DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L M(,/L MG/L P MG/L
73/u5/19 ii 44 u.24 0.440 0.027 0.005K 0.010
73/06/lb 09 45 0.370 0.480 0.018 0.009 u.0i ,
73/01/12 j9 30 0.440 0.500 u.o22 0.011
li/lu/li 13 ‘ 0.250 0.150 0.012 v.009 0.009
73/11/18 14 15 0.312 0.300 0.016 0.00 5K 0.015
73/id/lb 10 25 0.7 ,0 0.90u 0.035 0.008 U. O lu
74/01/13 13 25 1.040 0.400 0.036 o.O O5tc 0. O lu
74/02/10 11 00 1.2d0 0.200 0.025 0.005K U.00
74/02/24 j4 00 v.870 0.600 0.035 0.010 0.035
7’./u3/23 10 00 v.720 i.30u u.U35 0.010 0.010
14/04/10 10 15 u.77U 0.600 0.040 0.010 0.010
74/u4/21 1’4 55 u.3d0 i.20u 0.045 0.005 ’s 0.u l ,
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO ET E1I’UEVAL UATt. N/0 /u3
• 1ou1
‘.1 lei jU.0 J Q db 00.0
trfflSti UN
‘ ? 7.5 S’-1A Sd1LLt.
1,S’-ft.’ ANuu -i s
) 15d7 i L)G .- MI 01 H NY 1 i
I1Et- ALLS 21112J4
4 0000 F t T OEi Tr1
U b3i 00b25 vOblU
DAlE TIME DEPTrI •‘ 02sNO3 TOT I JEL NrIj-N P- OS—UIS ri0S—1UF
Fr OM OF NTOTAL N TOTAL U IP1O
To OAY FEET M&/L G/L t,/L MG/L M(,/L
lj/o,/19 11 20 o.2 0 0.5 % u.050 3.100 u.1 u
73/J6/1 09 30 3.5 U 2.730 v.300 i . 7u
73/ ui/I c P9 00 1.580 0.750 v.017 u.490 J.bs O
7J/u /ic 11 10 1.Su O 0.2e ,ej 0.038 j.a80 0./9
73/UY/15 10 30 1.760 0.630 0.044 v.110
73/10/13 12 50 3. 410 0.s O O o.U3 v.320
73/11/18 1’. 30 u.61b 0...50 u. Obd 0. lb O u.c10
7j/12/lb 15 00 U. DU 0.500 0.128 0.0 0
74/01/13 12 30 1. Ob O 0.200 0.13 u.U84 j.13 0
7’./U /1u 11 15 C,.990 0.700 0.115 0.130 (j, 11 ,
74/02/24 14 00 3.890 1.300 O.13u 0.050 v.10)
74/03/23 10 35 0.540 1.000 0.U u u.030 U.U 5
74/04/10 10 30 v.670 1.400 u.UlU 0.015
74/v4/21 14 35 v.2’40 1.000 0.110 0.025 0.015
-------
STu ET RET 1EVAL DAtE 75/02/03
421 bE 1
41 11 00.0 v80 19 12.0
L AC r . A W A NNOCK
1.5 F’ .L)UN1A
I/r..NANijO LS
r tJ T5 ’. b U( Al t 1(, btNO
I IEPALES 2111 ’.
4 0000 FEET DEPTr
00o30 0062 Oublu 00671 00665
DATE TIME DE ’Tf-1 WO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL N113—N hOSDIS PHOs—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O Tr1O
TO DAY FEET MG/L M&/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/05/19 10 35 0.220 0.370 0.027 0.011
73/06/16 09 55 0.360 2.200 0.042 0.015
73/u 1/1 19 40 0.320 1.u80 0.u19 0.027 u.210
73/08/12 iO 25 0.231 0.210 0.019 0.028 0.035
7j/09/lj 10 15 (.200 0.720 0.022 0.u19 0.d40
73/10/13 13 40 0.154 0.800 u.017 0.027 0.17
73/k1/1. 1 13 50 0.232 0.700 0.032 0.020
73/12/16 1415 u.710 1.500 0.084 0.01? 0.015
7L./01/13 11 45 0.650 0.100 K 0.032 0.008 0.015
74/02/09 14 20 0.620 0.550 0.020 0.006 0.015
74/02/23 14 20 u.610 0.700 0.040 0.005K v.020
74/03/10 09 45 0.990 0.550 i.050 0.005 0.092
74/03/23 12 50 0.600 0.600 0.030 0.010 0. O ls
74/04/21 14 15 u.33 0 0.300 0.015 0.005 0.u2S
K VALUE KNOWN TO E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO ET EflqEVAL DATE 7,102/33
4 fl i• I
‘.1 lb 5.0 u 0 1 Oi.u
UuL r U
42 1.5 F LIJUN1
T/Sr1t AN U 1Vtr( (t
A -twY r,kU(.’ ‘. MI
1 1r ’ALtS
4
E. Up : - (.LA”’
l11dQ4
0000 FE .T UEPTh
00630
006?
0061 * 3
00671
0066 : ,
i ATL
TIME
DLPTrI
%Iu ? NO3
TOT KJEL
Nri3N
Pt-1OS-DIS
Pri*Jb—1O1
RUM
OF
J—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
U 1H0
TO
i)AY
FEET
M(,/L
M6/L
M /L
MG/L -
M(j/L
73/05/1’
10
20
0.80*3
0.36u
0.02a
0.J1 +
(.u20
7j/06/1b
10
05
1.200
5.100
0.13t
3.053
li/ui/i?
20
00
0.7’+0
0.580
0.024
u.031
0.105
7j/08/12
10
40
0.1/b
0.520
0.019
0.025
0.06
73/09/1:,
10
10
u. 450
0.960
0.020
0.037
0.045
7J/10/1J
14
00
u.1 1i9
0.350
0.014
0.031
0.045
li/LI/i -s
14
00
0.630
0.150
0.016
0.010
0.021
73/12/16
14
?5
2.16u
0. 00
0.028
0.016
0.0 2
74/uI/li
11
55
1.920
0.700
u. 032
v.012
v.025
74/02/09
14
Is
1.92*3
0.400
0.050
0.0.1i
u.0l
74/02/23
14
35
1.430
0.600
0.o3o
0.015
0.045
74/ 03/10
10
05
1.520
2.400
0.100
*3.015
0.01
74/03/23
14
05
1.600
0.800
u.0 2 5
0.010
0.020
74/*34/21
14
10
u.730
0.300
0.020
v.005
0.02
-------
STORET kETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
‘.216G1
41 Ia 58.0 080 23 Id.0
MA’,ARbEE RtJ
42 1.5 Sr4k SV1LLt.
1/SrItNAN(jU RIVtN f ES
A HWY 2 d HrWG 1.2 MI E OF CLARK
11E ALLS 2111204
OvOD FEET O€PTH
00630 00625 00610 00b7 1 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NI-13—N iOS-O1S PHOS-TtiT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL URTrIO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MulL MG/L I-’ MG/L
73/05/19 10 05 0.170 0.310 0.005K 0.007 I .U10
73/ub/16 10 15 0.840 3.600 0.095 0.044
lj/Ol/12 20 10 0.035 0.390 0.029
73/ud/12 10 50 0.02’. 1.000 0.044 0.010 0.035
73/u9/15 10 00 0.042 1.400 0.045 0.005 0.040
73/10/13 14 10 0.017 0.450 0.014 0.014 0.030
73/U/Id 14 10 0. Od O 1.100 0.040 0.008 0.022
73/1 /16 14 35 1.180 0.400 0.028 0.005 0.027
74/01/13 12 05 1.180 0.100K 0.012 0.005K 0.025
76/02/O’ 14 05 1.090 0.300 0.020 0.005K 0.u lu
74/02/23 14 65 0.970 1.000 0.035 0.015 u. OJu
74/03/10 10 10 0.850 3.700 0.128 0.015 0.090
74/03/23 14 10 0.710 1.100 0.025 u.005 0.020
74/04/21 14 05 0.232 0.400 0.015 0.005K 0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
TO Lr ftJI IEVAL L)Aft l5/U2/u 3
4 I brl 1
‘+1 lb U’ U ‘. 0.0
( )LJt.N I (tJrI
1. SrlAr SV1LL:
1/,t-ILNANL,U r’I L P t
PM H Y rikt)( , jU’ T t. U CLARK
1 IEYALtS d11l u +
4 0000 FE 1 DLr TH
u0630 00625 0u610 00671 006b
[ JAIL TIME DEPTH u iO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nr13—N Pi-I OS—f)JS Pi-iOS-IOT
FP UM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O T -1O
TO UAY FEET Mb/L lG/L M /L M6/L P MGIL
7j/05/I’ u9 50 0.520 0.350 .022 0.012
7j/06/lf, 10 ?2 U,8bU 3.u5u O . J56 u.030
7j/u7/1. 0 15 ).l7u 0.320 0.039 ( 1.uI 0.030
7J/uM/1/ 10 55 0.040 0.l O Otc u. 029 (i.015 0.030
7j/uY/1’, 0 # .S t,.064 0.520 u.044 0.012 0.035
73/10/13 14 20 0.015 0.650 0.C31 0.013 0.020
73/I1/1 1’. ?0 0.092 0. 50 0.016 0.012
7j/12/lb l . 45 1.1 ) 0.80u G.u40 0.026 u.035
74/01/04 t 16 1.400 0. 00 0.028 0.010
74/02/09 14 00 1.5( 10 0.600 0. o30 0. O l o 0.015
74/U /23 14 So u.940 0.eu O u.03J u.020 0.045
74/03/10 10 15 1.000 .3.100 0,dbu o.02 5 u.u 3u
74/03/23 14 20 1.000 0. 00 .0d5 u.02u 0.045
74/04/21 1’. 00 LJ.3t 0.J 00 0. 02u u.005 0.O Ii
K VALUE KNOWN TO dE
LESS THAri INDICATED
-------
STO ET R€:T IEvAL DATL 75/02/u3
4dIbJ I
41 1 30.0 080 27 30.0
I- 1NE riOLLOW PUN
42 7. S Ak vILLt
T/SHENANGU PIVLk S
PA HwY 518 t U, JOSE W OF LAMONTS CO ”JLP
LIEPALES 2111du4
4 0000 rrET UEPT 1
00630 00625 00610 00671 00b6S
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—L I5 P 1-lOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL URTr IO
TO DAY FEET MG/L hlG/L M1 ,/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/u /P4 09 28 0.300 0.350 0.032 0.050 (i. Oos
7j/06/16 10 45 0.510 1.540 0.096 0.056
73/ 07/id 20 20 0.189 0.340 0.04d 0.075 0.095
7j/08/12 10 00 0.038 0.430 0.115 iJ.0b3 0. luO
73/09/15 11 15 0.17b 0.400 0.044 0.138 0. lbu
73/Io/13 14 50 0.200 0.400 0.049 0.154 0.190
73/11/18 13 50 0.108 0.250 0.056 0.168 u.195
7j/1d/16 14 00 u.790 0.400 0.072 0.056 0.080
74/01/13 II 20 u.750 0.600 0.088 0.080 0.115
74/Od/09 10 00 C.6b0 0.300 0.050 0.030 0.035
74/02/24 13 00 0.920 1.300 0.270 0.110 0.d 0
74/03/23 10 55 0.61t 0.t o O 0.055 0.035
74/%)’+/j0 09 30 0.910 1.300 u.120 0.035 0.075
74/04/21 15 25 0.088 0.900 0.025 0.065 0.075
-------
STOi ET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/u3
42 16Ad TF42 IbA 8 P010000
41 23 55.0 080 23 10.0
8O OUGH OF (,REENVILLL
42 7. Gr EENVILLE W
U/SHt.NANGO 1VER REStMVO
SrIENANuO RIVER RESERVOIR
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2bNQ3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—L)IS PHO -TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MGD
TO DAY FEET 14G/L MG/L HG/L MG/L P M&/L P INST MC,O MONTHLY
73/06/26 09 00
CP(T)— 10.800 4.100 0.470 7.300 9.000 1.160 1.b9 0
73/06/26 15 00
73/07/24 09 00
CP(T)— 8.100 4.500 0.440 8.900 10.500 1.010 1. 40
73/07/24 15 00
73/08/28 09 00
CPU)— 5.300 1.760 8.700 10.500 1.040 0.879
73/08/28 15 00
73/09/25 09 00
CP(T)— 13.400 4.800 0.660 12.000 12.000 0.880 0.834
73/09/25 15 00
73/10/30 09 00
CP(T)— 8.700 2.500 0.270 4.600 5.400 1.940 1.080
73/10/30 15 00
73/11/27 09 00
CP(T)— 11.000 4.500 0.540 5.100 6.450 1.620 1.330
73/11/27 15 00
73/12/26 09 00
CP(T)— 11.400 3.800 1.000 5.000 6.600 3.57u 1.570
73/12/26 15 00
74/01/29 09 00
CP(T)— 4.600 6.800 1.440 2.320 4.800 2.180 1.96u
74/01/29 15 00
74/02/26 09 00
CP(T)— 6.100 9.300 2.400 4.500 5.500 1.740 1.620
74/02/26 15 00
74/03/28 09 00
CP(T)— 2.640 4.500 0.670 3.900 4.900 2.350 2.730
74/03/28 15 00
74/04/30 09 00
CP(T)— 7.500 7.400 0.710 5.5 )0 6.700 2.380 2.250
74/04/30 15 00
74/05/28 09 00
CP(T)— 13.000 6.800 1.300 5.500 6.900 1.320 1.980
74/U5/28 15 00
-------
STOkE! kETRIEVAL i) TE. 75/02/u3
421bA i EF4216 t-4 P0100u0
41 23 S .0 (,80 23 10.0
eJr Uuuri Of (,RtENVILLL
l.b Gr LENV1LLt. W
L,/Sr1EN N(,U IVE ktS VO
Sr$ NAN(,t) LVE PEstkVOLk
I1LPALES 21412u’.
‘4 0000 lEET DEPTh
)063U 00625 006 U 0 671 Ot)6tS 50051 5 0S3
DATE TIMt. DLPT,-$ NO2 NO3 TOT JEL Ni13—N PiIOS—DIS PrjOS—TOf FLOW LUl JL)ULF
F UM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL CJRTHO RAft fLOw-Mbu
TO DAY FEET MG/L h&/L rl&/L P MG/L r INST MGD MUNTHL(
7’+/C6/2 u9 00
CPU)— 13.400 6.200 ).420 b.900 F . 0U 1.64u 1. 1u
74/ut’/2b 15 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4216AC D421’,Ai. P007013
‘.1 2’. 44.0 080 23 13.0
r tYNOLDS DISPOSAL (GP EENVILLE)
42 7.5 GREENVILLE W
O/SH NAN(,O RIVER RESIRVO
SHENAN(,O RIVER RESERVOIR
1ILPAL S 214120’.
4 0000 FEET DEPTrI
00b30 00625 00610 00611 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TUT FLOw CONOUZI
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw-MOD
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P MG/I P INST MOD MONTHLY
73/07/17 11 00
CP(T)— 0.100 11.000 0.490 3.900 5.900 0.388 0.515
73/07/17 16 07
73/08/20 11 00
CPU)— 0.980 16.000 3.740 6.600 7.300 0.207 0.325
73/08/20 16 00
73/09/20 11 00
CPT— u.3’.0 15.600 9.660 6.380 9.200 0.295 0.250
73/09/20 16 00
73/10/18 11 00
CPU)— 1.200 21.000 7.100 5.700 7.900 0.195 0.207
73/10/lB 16 00
73/11/19 Ii 00
CP(T)— 0.350 12.000 0.830 4.700 6.100 0.608 0.388
73/11/19 16 00
73/12/20 11 00
CP(T)— 0.600 8.900 0.790 2.310 4.500 0.388 0.608
73/12/20 16 00
74/01/21 11 00
CPU)— 2.520 3.600 0.210 0.740 1.250 1.110 0.608
74/01/21 16 00
74/02/20 11 00
CP(T)— 2.000 10.000 1.250 3.500 4.900 0.608 0.608
74/02/20 16 00
74/03/20 11 00
CP(T)— 3.520 2.000 0.050K 1.450 2.200 0.608 0.853
74/03/20 16 00
74/04/19 11 00
CPU)— 3.800 4.000 0.100 1.900 2.700 0.853 1.110
74/04/19 16 00
74/05/20 11 00
CPU)— 1.480 9.000 0.210 1.900 3.400 0.853 1.110
74/05/20 16 00
74/06/20 11 00
CP(T)— 1.200 14.000 1.250 3.sOO 5.700 O.3o8 0.388
74/06/20 16 00
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOk€T Eh LEVAL DATc. 15/02/03
P00 1 )000*
‘+1 2’. 3b.0 ( 8U 23 J .0
r1N ,Huu tL CTN1L COr
42 1.t, Cjr E NV1LLL W
r/ 1LNAN(,O r’ 1VL r SEr VO
St1rNI NbO -‘j1E Stj vU1k
11tYALt 14i20 ’.
4 (iOOo F€t.T L)EPT-s
DArt.
FROM
TO
T IME
OF
L)AY
00630
DEPTr NU2 NO3
N—TOTAL
F€.ET MulL
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00o1 0
N 3—N
TOTAL
Mb/L
0u66 , 50051
Pr4O -TOT
A L
Mj/L ? INST Mt, [ ,
so U S
CONi)U I T
FLU -MGU
M ONTHLr
73/08/01
1)9
00
‘+u. Oth)
0.310
73/09/0’.
14
30
73/10/02
14
00
197.000
5.600
73/11/01
11
00
255.0th)
15.UUu
i.000
13/12/lu
12
30
71.000
1. 0 0 0t\
0 ,725
74/01/04
10
00
370.000
0.?50 c
0.u’ .0I
7’ ./u2/01
10
00
126.000
5.u Ou
2.100
14/03/01
08
00
168.000
2.d Ou
1.950
74/04/01
08
00
38.000
1.u0U
l).27 0
74/05/06
11
00
160.000
2.900
2.800
7 ’ ./06/01
1)8
00
1 ib.0UO
2.600
2.300
74/ul/01
12
00
81.000
2.U Ou
.i.990
74/ Od/27
2.750
1.300
0.05(11 ’
00671
I HO5 -U IS
U I p-1O
MG/L f)
3.900
16 .0
14u .001)
68.000
(a • 130
1 7 3.oOO
I 7u.000
115.000
• 0th,
64 • 000
73.000
1Ls. 30
u.U10
u.o l U
1.580
0.u l O
U.u lu
4 5.uU O
0.010
0.010
1 s 8. ooo
0.010
u.u l o
7s. ( aUu
0.010
0.010
3.900
0.ij lU
0.010
180.001)
0.010
0.010
170.000
0.u lU
U. O lu
1d6.u ou
0.010
0.U lu
300.000
o.u l O
0.010
9 6. OOu
U.Oiu
U.Ulu
73.000
u. 01U
0.010
71.Uu O
U.u l O
0.010
K VALUE tcNOWN TO 8E
LESS TI-IAN INOICATEL ,
-------
STORET NETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
4216AE AS4216A
41 23 05.0 080 26 30.0
JAMESTOWN STP
42 7.5 Gh LENV1LLE W
T/SP4ENAGO WESERVOIrC
SHENAGO NIVER
1 LEPALES
4
P000960
2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
Nr$3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOw—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST M(,D
MONTHLY
73/08/13
12 00
CPU)—
3.400
0.460
0.154
6.670
7.600
0.093
0.120
73/08/14
12 00
73/09/17
00 00
CPU)—
5.100
0.550
0.088
8.000
8.200
0.072
0.116
73/09/17
24 00
73/10/14
07 00
1.920
8.280
0.050
8.275
8.280
0.074
0.112
73/11/13
00 00
CP(T)—
10.600
7.380
0.086
7.375
7.380
0.085
0.103
73/11/13
02 00
73/12/14
9.900
1.400
0.014
4.300
4.300
0.158
0.106
74/01/14
00 00
CP(T)—
14.300
6.500
0.220
5.550
5.800
0.112
0.156
74/01/14
04 00
74/02/17
00 00
CP(T)—
10.400
1.400
0.048
4.100
4.400
0.127
0.201
74/02/17
04 00
74/03/17
00 00
CP(T)—
7.100
1.000K
0.050K
1.650
1.800
0.241
0.189
74/03/17
04 00
74/04/17
00 00
CP(T)—
8.000
1.000K
0.340
2.200
2.300
0.240
0.253
74/04/17
24 00
74/05/17
12 00
6.720
1.100
0.067
2.000
2.200
0.231
0.243
74/06/15
5.880
1.000K
0.050K
5.400
5.800
0.213
74/07/15
16 00
4.900
1.000K
0.0 50K
5.000
5.300
0.105
0.147
74/08/14
4.000
1.000K
0.050K
2.900
0.110
0.147
LESS THgN INDICATED
-------
SToRE! - LTRIEVAL DATL 75/02/lu
4216MM
41 24 J1.J u80 2 1 24.J
t.Jr EENV1LLr. TUdLS U IVISIUN
£42 (s D Gr EENV1LLL W
F/Sr-4LNi NGu R1Vh Rt Lkv()
1G RUN
I 1LP LLS
-4
L)M ft
FROM
Tu
73/0b/21
73/ui/il
73/0 / 17
73/09/2 5
7 3/i U/2t,
74/0 ./li
74/t) 5/2 )
74/06/17
74/09/14
lIME DEPTr
OF
DAY FELT
14 30
11 30
1 00
1’+ 00
14 00
03 00
14 00
UU630
00625
00610
00b7 1
OObbS
00S1
50053
i’JO2 .NOJ
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
RhOS—DIS
PrIOS—lol
FLUw
CONDu II
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
(i FHO
RATL
FLU —MULi
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
M6/L
P
MG/L
i
INSI MGI)
MONTHLy
P000000 ”
DEPTH
2 1’. 1204
0000 I ELT
0 • I 3u
2.150
1.000
0 • 5b()
3.800
3.680
1 7.buO
3.200
2.4J0
1 • 320
0 • 180
0, 190
0.110
0.5001<
1.0001<
1.0001<
1.0001<
0.5001<
0.140
0.072
0.012
0.130
0.0 71
U • 2’.u
0.100
0.0501<
0 • 350
C.. 12()
0 .u77
U • 0s2
0 • 0 501<
0.015
o • 0501<
o • 0501<
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
3.u O O
0.039
.601j
0 • 28u
0 .USH
u • 0 501<
L) .0501<
0.057
U • 320
0.320
O . 320
0 • 320
0 • 3 0
O • 320
0 • 320
0 • 320
o • 320
0 • 2b9
0 • 800
0 •
0 • 266
•
0 • 2b6
0 • b9
0 • 800
0.270
-------
STPiEI ET dEVAL UATc /o2/u3
0002uJ
-,. 1hYA
41 S 00.0 UdO 1’. ud.0
LO. iMuuO t r SCriOtiL L)t Ir 1C
LLLV1L- NO
1/ ,r-QNANOO r k LSL VU
L1T1Lt S iE OO r 1VLr
A 1 ALLS
‘4
01Th33
00625
OuS lU
DATE
TIME
DEPTI-4
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
NriJ-N
F UM
OF
N—TOrAL
N
TOTAL
TO
DAY
FEET
M’ /L
MG/L
M6/L
0065-) buOSi
PriOs—TUT FLOM
A1 E
MulL INST i JL)
h/US/do 10 00
7j/07/2 10 00
7j/J8/2’. 10 00
73/ )9/dS 10 00
73/10/25 10 00
73/11/23 10 00
7311d/21 10 00
7’ /0L/25 10 00
74/02/25 10 00
74/03/25 10 00
74/04/25 10 00
74/05/24 10 00
74/06/21 10 00
43.200
29.000
8
2u .0(,U
4.600
5.600
1 3.000
19.20)
.0 00
26 .0
I s.5u0
52 • ii i U
0.470
2 • 3u0
2.200
I .uO)
u.300
0.500K
0.50 UK
0 . 500K
2.500
1.20u
3.400
Q’j6 7 l
PriOS- 0 1S
O T’1O
MG/L p.)
. 300
4.800
1 .6 4 u
S • 3 uL’
6.100
5.200
3.9’.0
100
,.600
1. 100
T.30 L
• 300
1 3.uUO
u.055
U • 140
0.023
o .52u
u. O I OK
o .u is
0.034
U. iSo
• u77
t, .obuc
0 .U uP
O .US0 c
U • OSU K
2141du
0000 FLtJ L)LPTII
U0S3
CU’iOUl 1•
LUw-Mut .
MON Ir-ILY
0.u O l
o • 001
0. O Os
0.000
0.001
0 .OOb
0.00 /
0.006
u.C05
0.002
s.60 0
S.S Oo
. UU
5.500
4.500
8. loU
8.4th)
90 LI
ID. 700
0.002
0 .u 1
u .0)
I) .uu9
0.008
U.u lO
0 .u09
0 . 0R
0.009
(1
U • OOuD
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS TP1I N INDICATED
-------
STORET ET 1EVAL DATE 7 /02/J3
.dl6Yt-
‘.1 2’. 39.0 080 23 0.U
. LI. rH,J CO. 1.IC. ( LNS IL
42 7.5 (.,- LENViLLL W
T/SNAI’4L,O IVE RI SL VO
LITTLE Sr1tNi NbO
11L ALES 21412 J ’+
0000 FT
4
DEPT i-I
00630
00625
00610
00871
006b
SO0 1
bUOSi
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT
-------
STO ET ‘cETRIEVAL DAIL 75/02/Ui
421t LM
41 24 u 0 db 7.u
Nt) ON • 1tJkJLE hUf4E PArEK
42 7.5 (v tLNV1LLt W
1/Sr4L’IANt,U IVEi tSfr.’ V0
biG U’ 1
I 1LI ALLS
4
UU00 ’.
21412
0000 FEET DEPTH
0063 o
00625
03610
OUbli
006b5
SO obi
50053
DALE
TLML
OEPT 1
‘JO2 N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PhOs—DIS
P i0s—1OT
FLOw
CUNJUIT
F OM
OF
ti—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
Oki hO
kAIL
FLO q—M(,L)
10
L)AY
FLET
MC,/L
MG/L
M,/L
MG/L
MG/L r
INST MbL)
MONTrILY
7j/)l/O?
10
00
0.280
0.700
o.030
2.400
2.400
0.003
0.004
73/u /3u
10
00
2.700
0.u58
4.620
s.30 J
0.003
0.00’.
73/10/0
10
00
0.180
5.550
2.100
5. Ss O
o.oso
0.003
0.004
73/11/06
09
30
u.09 0
12.500
1.410
b.90u
7.800
0.003
0.004
73/12/0 ’ .
10
30
0.090
21.000
6.700
7.200
b.90 0
0.u03
0.003
7 ’ ./ j1/07
10
00
u.12o
29.000
+.700
s.80t1
6.70w
u.u03
0.003
74/04/05
10
30
u.480
6.400
3.500
4.500
4.lUu
0.003
0.003
74/03/Ob
i i
00
0.28o
‘ ..9u 0
2.4uO
3.75u
4.000
0.003
0.004
74/04/03
10
00
1.280
1.oCj Otc
j.250K
1.400
3.100
0.004
0.004
74/05/08
09
30
1.160
1.0 ui
1.000K
0.460
i.e0i)
0.004
0.004
74/06/08
09
00
1.440
1.000K
1.000K
0.420
u.63tj
0.00’.
0.004
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATEL)
------- |