-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE
GREENWOOD, LAURENS, AND NEWBERRY COUNTIES
SOUTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
AND THE
SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
APRIL, 1976
-------
1
CONTENTS
1Q
Foreword
LiSt of South Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map V
Sections
I. Conclusions
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 15
VI. Appendices 16
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration coniiiitrnent to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)] ,
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Aniendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWL EDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental Control for professional involvement,
to the South Carolina National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those South Carolina waste-
water treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent
samples and flow data.
The staff of the South Carolina Bureau of Wastewater and
Stream Quality Control provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports,
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Robert L. McCrady, the Adjutant General of South
Carolina, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John P. DuPre (Retired),
who directed the volunteer efforts of the South Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
NAME COUNTY
Clark Hill Abbeville, McCor-
mick, SC; Colum-
bia, Elbert, Lin-
coln, McDuffie,
Wilks, GA
Fishing Creek Chester, Lancaster
Greenwood Greenwood, Laurens,
Newberry
Hartwell Anderson, Oconee,
Pickens, SC;
Franklin, Hart,
Stephens, GA
Keowee Oconee, Pickens
Marion Berkeley, Calhoun,
Claredon, Orange-
burg, Sumter
Moultrie Berkeley
Murray Lexington, Newberry,
Richiand, Saluda
Robinson Chesterfield, Dar-
1 ington
Saluda Greenville, Pickens
Secession Abbeville, Anderson
Wateree Fairfield, Kershaw,
Lancaster
William C. Bowen Spartanburg
Wylie York, SC; Gaston,
Mecklenburg, NC
-------
V
LAKE GREENWOOD
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Direct Drainage Area Boundary
I 1 0 PKm.
untain Inn
enwood
Map Location
Lou rens
Ninety Six
-------
LAKE GREENWOOD
STORET NO. 4504
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Lake Greenwood is eutrophic. It ranked
twelfth in overall trophic quality when the 13 South Carolina
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six
parameters*. Ten of the lakes had less median total phosphorus,
nine had less and one had the same median dissolved phosphorus,
11 had less median inorganic nitrogen, seven had less mean chloro-
phyll a, and seven had greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
Marked depression or depletion of dissolved oxygen with depth
occurred at all four sampling stations in July and September.
Survey limnologists did not observe surface concentrations of
algae or aquatic macrophytes at any of the three sampling times.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
There was a significant loss of nutrients in the assay sample
between the time of collection and the beginning of the assay,
and the results are not representative of conditions in the lake
at the time the sample was taken (03/28/74). However, the lake
data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1 . Point sources--The phosphorus contributions of the point
sources considered in this report amounted to an estimated 86.2%
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
of the total load reaching Lake Greenwood during the sampling
year. The Greenville plant contributed over 76% of the load,
and the remaining 12 plants collectively contributed 9.8%.
There are at least 69 generally small domestic and industrial
point sources in the drainage that were not sampled during the
year (see pages 10-li). Therefore, it is likely that the actual point-
source contributions were greater than indicated above, although
the phosphorus export rates of the sampled tributaries indicate
the phosphorus contributions of these sources probably were rela-
tively small (see below).
The phosphorus loading of 8.69 g/m 2 measured during the sam-
pling year is almost eight times that proposed by Vollenweider
(Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page
14). While even complete removal of phosphorus at the point
sources considered in this report would still leave a loading of
1.19 g/m 2 /yr , it is likely that a high degree of phosphorus
removal at the significant point sources would result in an
improvement in the trophic condition of Greenwood Lake and bene-
fit downstream Lake Murray* as well.
On the basis of nutrient retention in Lake Greenwood during
the sampling year (77.3% P and 38.5% N), it is calculated that
the point sources impacting this lake indirectly contributed
78,285 kg P and 577,830 kg N to downstream Lake Murray.
W rking Paper No. 436.
-------
3
2. Non-point sources--The estimated phosphorus contributions
of non—point sources accounted for 13.8% of the total load reaching
the lake during the sampling year. The Saluda River contributed
5.3%, Reedy River contributed an estimated 3.9%, and the remaining
four tributaries collectively contributed 2.7% of the total load.
Minor tributaries and imediate drainage contributed an estimated
1.7% of the total.
With the exception of Cane Creek, the phosphorus export rates
of the tributaries were relatively low (page 14) and compare fairly
well with the export rates of tributaries sampled elsewhere in
South Carolina; e.g., the mean of the rates of Lake Keowee* tribu-
taries was 17 kg/km 2 /yr (range of 15 to 19 kg/km 2 /yr).
As far as is known, none of the unsampled point sources noted
above discharge to Cane Creek, and the higher export rate of this
stream probably is due to land-use practices, although septic tanks
at Waterloo may contribute to the stream load (see map, page v).
* Working Paper No. 433.
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryti:
1. Surface area: 46.14 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 6.8 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 21.0 meters.
4. Volume: 315.403 x lO m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 74 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Na me
Saluda River
Turkey Creek
Reedy River
Rabon Creek
Long Lick Branch
Cane Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Total s
Drainage
area (km 2 )*
1,471.1
117.8
655.3
326.3
20.3
60.3
281 .2
2,932.3
Mean flow
( m 3 /sec)*
28.04
1 .67
9.97
4.63
0.29
0.86
4.00
49.46
2. Outlet -
Saluda River
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 139.5 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 116.8 centimeters.
2,978.4**
49 .46**
t Table of metric conversions-—Appendix B.
tt Mast, 1974; King, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “. . .Survey Methods,
1973-1976”.
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Greenwood was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Fluey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from a
number of depths at four stations on the lake (see map, page v). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was
composited from the stations for phytoplanktofl identification and enumer-
ation; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated
sample was coniposited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-
integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll
a analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 17.1 meters at station
1, 13.7 meters at station 2, 7.3 meters at station 3, and 5.8 meters
at station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix 0 and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
4 SITES
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL Cr1A ACTERIsTICS FOR LAr E GREENWOOD
STORET CODE ‘.504
ISI SANPL ING ( 3/2 /73 2ND SAMPLING I 7/ 9/13)
tTES
3RD SAMPLING 1 9/18/73)
4 SITES
PA4AMLTER
. ANG1
MEAN
MEuIAN
P ANOE
MEAN
MEDIAN
MANUE
MEAN
MEOIAN
TEMP (C)
14.0
— 15.8
15.C
15.2
13.9
— 32.7
26.6
28.4
17.8
— 28.7
25.0
24.9
DISS OXY (MG/LI
7.5
- 9.3
R.4
8.5
0.5
- 9.5
4.2
2.8
0.0
- 6.6
3.0
3.4
CNDCP Y IMC (OMO)
50.
— 70.
54.
55.
50.
— 120.
66.
60.
39.
- 124.
72.
75.
PH (STAND UNITS)
7.5
- 8.1
7.7
7.7
6.2
— 8.9
7.’.
6.8
6.4
— 7.4
6.7
6.7
TOT ALIc (MG/LI
10.
— 15.
12.
12.
16.
— 42.
24.
21.
10.
— 34.
20.
22.
LOT p) (M(,/L)
0.06.1
— 3.15
0.091
O.Odl
0.018
— 0.126
0.044
0.031
0.019
— 0.264
0.092
0.045
ORTHU P (MG/LI
0.011
— 0.034
0.019
0.019
0.003
— 0.035
0.009
0.006
0.005
— 0.046
0.017
0.011
N02 .NO] (MG/LI
0.320
— 0.690
0.391
0.380
0.050
— 0.430
0.157
0.095
0.030
— 0.420
0.133
0.045
AM’lO’ IA (MG/LI
0.030
— 0.110
0.095
0.090
0.060
— 0.580
0.213
O.09u
0.040
— 1.860
0.381
0.195
KJEL Li (MG/LI
0.200
— 0.500
0.327
0.300
0.320
— 1.300
0.640
0.600
0.200
— 2.500
0.911
0.R00
INU U N (MG/LI
0.363
— 0.780
0.48
0.470
0.110
— 0.960
0.371
0.305
0.070
— 1.900
0.513
0.425
TOTAL N (MG/LI
O.5 0
— 1.090
0.724
0.700
0.410
— 1.680
0.797
0.750
0.230
— 2.540
1.044
1.040
C’-4LMP L A ( Jr ., )
4.1
— 7.2
5.7
5.8
4.9
— 13.9
10.5
11.5
1.7
— 12.3
8.2
9.5
SFCC’-fl (ML1E S)
0.3
— 0.8
0.5
0.5
0.9
—
0• .
-------
7
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
03/28/73 1. Cryptonionas 273
2. Centric diatoms 182
3. Melosira 137
4. Oscillatori p . 68
5. Mallomonas . 46
Other genera 205
Total 911
07/09/73 1. Lynqbya p. 2,456
2. Cyclotella . 665
3. Nitzschia p. 462
4. Flagellates 433
5. RaphidiopsiS p. 433
Other genera 2,429
Total 6,878
09/18/73 1. Raphidiop j . 9,263
2. DactylococcopsiS 1,693
3. Oscillatoria p. 796
4. AnabaenopsiS p. 697
5. Lyngbya 399
Other genera 1 ,594
Total 14,442
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/l )
03/28/73 1 5.2
2 7.2
3 6.4
4 4.1
-------
8
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number fpg/l )
07/09/73 1 9.2
2 13.9
3 4.9
4 13.9
09/18/73 1 8.0
2 11.0
3 12.3
4 1.7
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
A 45% loss of phosphorus occurred in the assay sample between
the time of collection and the beginning of the assay. Therefore,
the results are not representative of conditions in the lake at
the time the sample was taken (03/28/73). However, the lake data
indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling times; i.e., the
mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 25/1 or greater
at all sampling times, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.
-------
9
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the South Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff month of January when two samples were collected. Sampling
was begun in February, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the South Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
Except for the Reedy River, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries
were determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey
computer program for calculating stream loadings*. Stream loads shown
are those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for the Reedy River and unsanipled “minor tributaries
and immediate drainage” (“ZL” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the
nutrient loads at stations D-1 and E-l, in kg/kni 2 /year, and multiplying
the means by the Reedy River and ZZ areas in km 2 .
The operators of the Belton, Greenville, Ware Shoals #2, and West
Pelzer wastewater treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples
and corresponding flow data. The operators of the Honea Path #1
and Ware Shoals #1 plants provided samples but only estimated
flows, and the other listed communities did not participate;
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
Na me
Bel ton
Easley
Georges Creek
Gi enwood
Brushy Creek
Greenville
Honea Path
#1
#2
Pi edrnont
Ware Shoals
#1
West Peizer
Will iamston
#1
#2
In addition
municipal plants
Broad Mouth Cr.
Georges Cr.!
Saluda R.
Br. of Brushy Cr.
Brushy Cr.!
Saluda R.
Reedy River
Broad Mouth Cr.
Clatworthy Cr.!
Saluda R.
Grove Cr.!
Saluda R.
Turkey Creek
Saluda River
Saluda River
Saluda River
Big Creek
at least two other
(i.e., Mauldin and
Pelzer; combined PE of about 600), and the Western Carolina Regional
Sewer Authority operates 11 mostly small wastewater treatment facil-
ities, including Piedmont. Also, there are at least 27 privately-
owned domestic waste treatment plants in the drainage. The signifi-
cance of these sources is not known, but the nutrient contributions
* Anonymous, 1971; Foley, 1976; survey questionnaires (page 15).
** More than 25% of the waste load is industrial.
10
nutrient loads from these sources were estimated at 1 .134 kg P and 3.401
kg N!capita!year.
A. Waste Sources*:
1. Known municipal -
Receiving
__________ __________ Water
Pop.
Served
1 ,200
2,800
2,000
3,000
115,000
4,000
2,000
1 ,405
1 ,600
1 ,200
1 ,000
1 ,300
2,500
to the
in the
Treatment
stab, pond
stab. pond
stab, pond
stab, pond
tr. filter
stab. pond
stab. pond
act. sludge
stab. pond
act, sludge
act. sludge
stab. pond
act, sludge
above sources,
Lake Greenwood
Mean Flow
fd)
836.5
1,059.8
757.0
1,135.5
98,569.0
927.3
757.0
757.0
832.7
17,513.2
295.2
283.9
1 ,419.4
there are
drainage
-------
11
of most of them are included in the loads attributed to the sam-
pled tributaries.
2. Known industrial-—There are at least 29 industrial waste
treatment facilities in the drainage, but the nutrient signifi-
cance of these sources is not known.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Saluda River 21,205 5.3
Turkey Creek 1,040 0.3
Reedy River 15,725 3.9
Rabon Creek 6,875 1.7
Long Lick Branch 545 0.1
Cane Creek 2,165 0.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 6,750 1.7
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
E as 1 ey
Georges Creek 3,175 0.8
Glenwood 2,270 0.6
Brushy Creek 3,400 0.8
Greenville 306,530 76.5
Honea Path
#1 4,535 1.1
#2 2,270 0.6
Piedmont 1,595 0.4
Ware Shoals
#1 1,815 0.4
#2 12,230 3.1
West Pelzer 1,100 0.3
WI 11 iamston
#1 1,475 0.4
#2 2,835 0.7
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ? -
e. Industrial - Unknown
f. Direct precipitation* - 805 0.2
Total 400,750 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Saluda River 90,815
3. r4et annual P accumulation — 309,935 kg.
See Working Paper rio. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load)
Saluda River 978,085 41.5
Turkey Creek 25,600 1.1
Reedy River 165,790 7.0
Rabon Creek 101,970 4.3
Long Lick Branch 3,920 0.2
Cane Creek 18,850 0.8
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) — 71,145 3.0
c. Known municipal STP’s
Belton 6,670 0.3
Easley
Georges Creek 9,525 0.4
Glenwood 6,800 0.3
Brushy Creek 10,205 0.4
Greenville 815,995 34.6
Honea Path
#1 13,605 0.6
#2 6,800 0.3
Piedmont 4,780 0.2
Ware Shoals
#1 5,440 0.2
#2 45,315 1.9
West Peizer 2,300 0.1
Will iamston
#1 4,420 0.2
#2 8,500 0.4
d. Septic tanks - Unknown
e. Industrial - Unknown
f. Direct precipitation* - 49,815 2.1
Total 2,355,530 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Saluda River 1,448,195
3. Net annual N accumulation - 907,335 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
D.
E.
14
Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
Saluda River 14 665
Turkey Creek 9 217
Rabon Creek 21 313
Long Lick Branch 27 193
Cane Creek 36 313
Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his dangerous” loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his “permissible” loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between “dangerous”
and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus_ Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 8.69 6.72 51.1 19.7
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Greenwood:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic loading) 1.12
“Permissible” (oligotrophic loading) 0.56
-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Pubi. No. OWP-l, vol. 4, Wash., DC.
Burns, Bobby, 1973. Survey questionnaire (Belton SIP). Belton.
Cox, Ray, 1973. Survey questionnaire (Honea Path STP). Honea Path.
Crum, W. Bowman, 1973. Survey questionnaire (Greenville and Williams-
ton STPs). SC Dept. of Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Davis, 4. A., 1973. Survey questionnaire (West Peizer SIP). West
Pelzer.
Foley, John R., 1976. Personal coninunication (permitted point sources
in Lake Greenwood drainage). SC Dept of Health & Env. Contr.,
Columbia.
King, Robert W., Jr., 1974. Personal conrnunication (lake volume).
SC Dept. of Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Mast, G. Nelson, 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
SC Dept. of Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Surber, Frank, 1973. Survey questionnaire (Ware Shoals STP). Ware
Shoals.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
Vi. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P I OPG N MEAN SEC CHLOQA MIN DC 1)155 ORI 1 O P
4503 FISHING CREEK r ESE vUIr 0.143 0.535 4 3.000 2.811 10.20C 0.051
4504 LAKE GREENWOOD 0.061 0.470 ‘.63.917 8.150 15.000 0.011
4505 LAKE P1Ae TwELL 0.013 0.130 ‘.22.000 6.157 15.000 0.00.
4506 LAKE MARION 0.055 0.280 470. llo 8.728 14.900 0.010
‘.507 LAKE MUPRAY 0.024 0.260 ‘.26.905 6.4’8 15.000 0.007
4508 LAKE . O81NSON 0.014 0.260 458.778 8.611 l ’ ..000 0.005
4510 LAKE WATEREE 0.094 0.4 O 475.667 8.408 14.100 0.03’.
4511 LAKE WYLIE 0.045 0.380 462.222 5.422 14.800 0.013
4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 0.025 0.200 455.36 d.800 11.200 0.0 Gb
4513 LAKE KEOwEE 0.008 0.170 371.7 50 2.d33 1s.00 0 0.003
‘.514 LAKE SECESSION 0.057 0.355 462.778 10.722 15.000 0.006
‘.515 SALUDA LAKE 0.046 0.230 476.833 1.517 10.800 0.006
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 0.022 0.360 459.889 3.911 15.000 0.007
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES !TH hIGHE VALUES (NUM8E OF LAP(ES 1TH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
INOI G
N
500-
MEAN SEC
MEAN
C-iLORA
15-
MIN 1)0
DISS
MEDIAN
O T iO P
INOEX
4503
FISHING CREEK
RESERvOIR
0 (
0)
0 (
0)
0 (
0)
2 (
11)
100 C 12)
0
( 0)
192
4504
LAKE C,PEENWOOD
17 C
2)
e C
1)
33 C
4)
42 C
5)
21 C 0)
25
C 3)
146
4505
LAKE HART ELL
92 C
11)
100 (
12)
92 C
11)
58 C
7)
21 C 0)
92
C 11)
455
4506
LAKE MARION
33 C
4)
50 C
6)
25 C
3)
17 C
2)
50 C 6)
33
C 4)
208
4507
LAKE MURRAY
67 C
8)
62 C
7)
83 (
10)
50 (
6)
21 C 0)
46
C 5)
329
4508
LAKE ROBINSON
R3 C
10)
62 C
7)
67 C
8)
25 C
3)
75 C 9)
83
( 10)
3 5
4510
LAKE WATEREE
8 (
1)
17 C
2)
17 C
2)
33 (
4)
67 C 8)
8
( 1)
150
4511
LAKE WYLIE
50 C
6)
25 (
3)
0 C 6)
67
a)
58 C 7)
17
C 2)
267
4512
LAKE P4OULTRIE
58 C
7)
83 C
10)
75 C 9)
8 C
1)
83 C 10)
71
C 8)
378
4513
LAKE KEOWEE
100 C
12)
92 C
11)
100 C 12)
83 C
10)
21 ( 0)
100
C 12)
‘ +96
451’.
LAKE SECESSION
5 C
3)
42 C
5)
42 C 5)
0 C
0)
21 C 0)
58
C 7)
188
4515
SALUDA LAKE
42 C
5)
75 C
9)
8 ( 1)
100 C
12)
92
C 11)
71
C 8)
388
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN
75 9) 33 ( ‘.s 58 C 7)
75 C 9) 21 C 0) 46 1 5) 308
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4513 LAKE KEOwEE 496
2 4505 LAKE HARTWELL 455
3 4508 LAKE ROBINSON 395
4 4515 SALUDA LAKE 388
5 4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 378
6 4507 LAKE MURRAY 329
7 4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 308
8 4511 LAKE WYLIE 267
9 4506 LAKE MARION 208
10 4503 FISHIN(., CREEK RESERVOIR 192
11 4514 LAKE SEC:SsloN 188
12 4510 LAKE WATEREt. 150
13 4504 LAKE GREENWOOD 146
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x lO = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRI8UTARY FLOW INFO MATIUN FOR SOUTH CA 10LINA
04/27/74
LAKE CODE 4506
LAPcE GREENWOOJ
TOTAL DRAINAGE AMEA OF LAKEISO cM) 2978.5
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LANE =
SUM OF SUR—ORAINA(,I ARIAS =
TRIBUTARY MONTH
YEAk I4EAN FLOW 3AY
FLOW DAY FLOW L)AY
FLOW
2 73 87.782
3 73 99.109
4 73 124.028
5 73 76.455
6 73 87.782
7 73 43.042
8 73 42.475
9 73 79.287
10 73 36.246
II 73 40.493
12 73 48.422
I 74 114.117
2 74 93.44 ’ .
73 54.085
3 73 67.394
4 73 74.756
5 13 56.634
6 73 48.988
7 73 30.016
8 73 26.193
9 73 32.848
ID 73 18.123
II 73 14.725
12 73 32.848
I 74 56.899
2 71. 50 .97
24 28.317
21 118.931
15 116.099
15 52.386
17 86.366
15 11.327
11 62.291
17 121.762
14 15.093
17 12.884
20 39.077
12 132.806
12 70.792
2’. 30.865
21 72.208
IS 53.236
15 45. 1473
I? 43.32
15 22.653
ii 22.0147
17 46.156
I’. 13.167
17 12.7 ’ .3
20
12 34.246
12 48.139
SU8-DPAIrJ. GE
NORMALIZED FLO.S(CMS)
TRIBUTARY
APEA(SO
I\M)
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JON
JUL
AtJ(,
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
1 .50 1 .AI
2978.5
60.60
66.54
78.12
69.94
50.12
41.91
36.81
36.25
33.98
36.2S
38.23
45.87
49.50
4504A2
1411.1
33.13
40.21
45.31
40.78
29.17
23.33
21.91
20.44
17.75
18.32
20.30
26.65
28.04
‘.50481
117.8
2.38
2.94
3.11
2.41
1.42
0.96
1.13
0.88
0.14
0.76
1.25
1.59
1.67
450 ’ .C1
655.3
12.63
15.72
18.32
14.53
9.06
7.31
7.08
6.88
.72
6.23
7.28
9.26
9.97
450401
328.3
6.57
8.13
10.25
6.68
3.91
2.66
3.34
2.49
1.84
2.01
3.45
4.39
4.63
‘.50 ’ .E1
20.3
0.40
0.51
0.62
0.1.2
0.25
0.17
0.20
0.17
0.11
0.14
0.23
0.28
0.29
4504F1
60.3
1.22
1.50
1.90
1.25
0.71
0.48
0.57
0.45
0.37
0.40
0.65
0.82
0.86
‘ .5Q’.ZZ
281.2
5.69
7.02
8.86
5.78
3.37
2.32
2.89
2.1s
1.59
1.73
2.97
3.79
6.00
H(AN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
SUMMARY
2978.5
TOTAL
FLOw
IN
=
595.24
2932.4
TOTAL
FLOW
OUT
=
595.22
‘ .S O 4AI
‘.504 AZ
26 87.782
26 .14.139
-------
T818U18RY FLOW INFO MA1ION FOR SOUIrl CAr OLINA
04/27/76
LAKE CODE 450’.
LAKI GREENWOOD
MEAN MONTNLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
2 73 3.398
3 73 2.549
4 73 3.851
5 73 0.991
6 73 2.549
7 73 0.623
8 73 0.765
9 73 2.832
10 73 0.566
II 73 0.510
12 73 0.850
74 2.549
2 74 3.964
2 73 22.087
3 73 25.485
4 73 27.241
5 73 17.698
6 73 13.592
7 73 8.212
8 73 7.221
9 73 15.574
10 73 6.654
I i 73 6.513
12 73 9.911
1 74 22.087
2 74 16.123
2 73 9.486
3 73 11.893
4 13 10.817
5 73 5.663
6 73 7.079
7 73 2.832
8 73 2.549
9 73 10.760
I C 73 2.124
II 13 1.416
12 73 3.398
I 74 7.787
2 74 11.04 ’.
2 73 0.566
3 73 0.425
4 73 0.65!
5 73 0.170
6 73 0.283
7 73 0.11)
8 13 0.142
9 73 0.510
10 73 0.085
II 73 0.085
12 73 0.l ’ .2
I 74 0.453
2 74 0.680
24 1.416
21 1.699
15 1.416
15 1.133
17 1.274
15 0.850
II 0.623
17 1.84!
14 0.425
11 0.425
20 1.161
12 1.926
12 1.218
24 8.637
21 21.946
IS 16.707
15 11.610
17 10.619
15 7.504
11 7.221
17 19.114
14 6.513
17 6.939
20 7.646
12 13.026
12 14.158
24 3.823
21 4.248
15 2.124
15 3.540
17 3.681
16 2.549
Ii 1.841
17 5.663
14 1.218
17 1.218
20 3.200
12 5.239
12 3.398
24 0.255
21 0.283
15 0.227
15 0.198
17 0.198
15 0.142
11 0.113
17 0.340
14 0.085
17 0.085
20 0.198
12 0.340
12 0.198
TRIbUTARY NONTN YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
450481
4504C 1
45040!
4S04L I
FLOW DAY FLOW
26 2.435
26 22.653
26 6.788
26 0.425
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FU SOUTH CAIWLINA
04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4504 LAKE GREENWOOD
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS
TRIbUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4504F1 2 73 1.841 24 0.736
3 73 1.274 21 0.850
4 73 1.9 2 15 0.708
5 73 0.538 15 0.623
6 73 1.133 17 0.566
7 73 0.283 15 0.425
8 73 0.283 11 0.340
9 73 1.557 17 0.991
10 73 0.283 14 0.227
11 73 0.255 17 0.227
12 73 0.425 20 0.595
1 74 1.331 12 0.991 2b 1.246
2 74 2.039 12 0.623
4504ZZ 2 13 7.929 24 3.398
3 73 6.230 21 3.964
4 73 9.260 15 3.115
5 73 2.407 15 2.832
6 73 5.663 17 3.115
7 73 1.529 15 1.982
8 73 1.841 11 1.557
9 73 7.221 17 4.531
10 73 1.331 14 1.048
11 73 1.274 17 1.133
12 73 1.841 20 2.832
I 7’+ 6.173 12 4.644 26 5.8b2
2 74 9.571 12 2.945
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/21
450401
34 10 60.0 081 54 40.0 3
LAKE GREEN OO0
45081 SOUTH CAROLINA
030892
1IEPALES 2111202
0040 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00’.I0 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALPc NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PiIOS—DIS
F 0M OF TEMP SECCMI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICPOMHO SO P46/L MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P
73/03/28 12 IS 0000 14.9 30 58 7.70 13 0.090 0.500 0.410 0.020
12 15 0004 14.9 8.6 55 7.60 14 0.080 0.200 0.390 0.019
12 IS 0015 14.8 7.8 55 7.70 14 0.090 0.200 0.380 0.018
12 iS 0035 14.1 7.5 55 7.60 14 0.090 0.200 0.380 0.019
73/07/09 16 45 0000 31.6 72 60 8.30 19 0.090 0.700 0.050 0.003
16 45 0006 30.0 8.6 72 6.50 20 0.060 0.400 0.060 0.007
16 45 0015 28.8 6.8 58 6.20 19 0.090 0.400 0.430 0.006
16 45 0030 19.8 0.5 58 6.50 23 0.260 0.600 0.270 0.004
16 45 0056 13.9 0.9 50 8.20 28 0.490 0.700 0.070 0.005
73/09/18 12 55 0000 28.0 43 74 6.70 20 0.060 0.700 0.040 0.008
12 55 0005 27.8 5.8 73 6.70 19 0.060 0.400 0.030 0.005
12 55 0015 26.1 1.6 80 6.70 22 0.250 0.600 0.090 0.008
12 55 0030 24.1 0.0 90 6.50 26 0.520 0.800 0.060 0.017
12 55 0038 19.8 0.0 85 6.50 25 0.750 1.000 0.040 0.011
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CPILRPNYL
FROM OF A
TO OAT FEET HG/L P UG/L
73/03/28 12 15 0000 0.066 5.2
12 15 0004 0.061
12 IS 0015 0.061
12 15 0035 0.06i
73/07/09 16 45 0000 0.018 9.2
16 45 0006 0.023
16 45 0015 0.030
16 45 0030 0.034
16 45 0056 0.048
73/09/18 12 cs 0000 0.020 8.0
12 55 0005 0.019
12 55 0015 0.030
12 SS 0030 0.041
12 SS 0038 0.033
V ’L 1
L ,S l-’i 1 t)IC- IEu
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450402
34 13 45.0 081 57 50.0 3
LAKE GREENWOOD
45059 SOUTH CAROLINA
030892
I1EPALES 2111202
0037 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER 00 TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO) TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT ‘lO/L INCHES MICROP4HO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/03/28 12 45 0000 15.6 16 55 7.80 13 0.090 0.500 0.400 0.019
12 45 0004 15.6 8.9 55 7.70 13 0.080 0.300 0.400 0.019
12 45 0015 15.2 8.4 55 7.80 12 0.090 0.300 0.400 0.020
12 45 0033 14.2 8.6 55 7.60 11 0.1)0 0.300 0.400 0.0)9
73/07/09 17 15 0000 32.0 36 59 8.60 18 0.070 0.500 0.060 0.004
17 IS 0006 30.0 9.0 51 7.70 17 0.060 0.400 0.050 0.005
17 15 0015 27.6 4.8 60 6.80 19 0.080 0.400 0.120 0.005
17 15 0025 23.0 0.6 60 6.30 20 0.170 0.400 0.320 0.006
17 15 0036 17.7 1.0 70 6.60 25 0.320 0.320 0.090 0.006
73/09/18 13 IS 0000 28.7 42 79 6.90 22 0.040 0.500 0.030 0.010
13 IS 0005 28.0 6.6 73 7.00 29 0.040 0.200K 0.030 0.009
13 IS 0015 27.5 4.0 75 6.90 21 0.130 0.200K 0.040 0.012
13 IS 0025 24.5 2.2 53 6.90 11 0.220 0.800 0.260 0.022
13 IS 0035 21.1 0.0 124 6.50 32 1.680 2.300 0.040 0.010
13 15 0045 17.8 0.0 117 6.60 34 1.860 2.500 0.040 0.008
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-JOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P 00/1
73/03/28 12 45 0000 0.087 7.2
12 45 0004 0.086
12 45 0015 0.099
12 45 0033 0.105
73/07/09 17 iS 0000 0.023 13.9
I? IS 0006 0.023
17 IS 0015 0.025
Ii IS 0025 0.030
17 IS 0036 0.031
73/09/IA 13 15 0000 0.022 11.0
13 IS 0005 0.023
13 15 0015 0.029
13 15 0025 0.130
13 15 0035 0.114
13 15 0045 0.108
LUE r iO.tJ io HE
LISS T- th I. j1C.*IEo
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450403
34 IS 00.0 082 01 15.0 3
LAKE GREENP000
45059 SOUTH CAROLINA
030892
I1EPALES 2111202
0024 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 7 ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROW OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/i MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/03/28 13 IS 0000 15.8 12 50 7.80 10K 0.110 0.500 0.370 0.019
13 IS 0004 15.7 8.6 50 7.50 10K 0.100 0.400 0.360 0.019
13 IS 0015 15.2 8.5 50 7.60 10K 0.090 0.300 0.3o0 0.017
13 15 0020 14.2 8.5 50 7.70 31 0.090 0.300 0.360 0.016
73/07/09 Ii 35 0000 32.7 72 58 8.90 21 0.070 0.700 0.050 0.004
17 35 0006 30.1 9.0 50K 7.80 16 0.070 0.500 0.060 0.006
17 35 0015 25.4 3.3 80 6.50 29 0.420 0.900 0.120 0.007
17 35 0024 22.1 1.0 80 6.50 30 0.460 0.800 0.100 0.007
73/09/18 13 40 0000 28.4 36 78 7.40 22 0.060 1.000 0.040 0.011
13 40 0005 27.7 6.4 77 7.40 22 0.060 0.600 0.050 0.008
13 40 0015 24.4 4.0 43 6.50 10 0.150 0.800 0.250 0.024
13 40 0020 23.8 3.2 41 6.90 10K 0.170 0.800 0.280 0.031
00665 32217
DATE lIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPNYL
FROl OF A
TO OA FEET MG/L P JG/L
73/03/2W 13 15 0000 0.112 6.4
13 IS 0004 0.112
13 15 0015 0.10
13 15 0020 0.118
73/07/09 Il 35 0000 0.029 4 9
17 35 0006 0.031
17 35 0015 0.069
17 35 0024 0.067
73/09/18 13 40 0000 0.049 32.3
13 O 0005 0.041
33 40 0015 0.162
13 40 0020 0.193
‘( V. L 1L - 4Up.r 10 H
LESS r.-L I r 1IC- lED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450404
34 21 20.0 082 05 20.0 3
LAKE GREENWOOD
45059 SOUTH CAROLINA
030892
11EPALES 2111202
0020 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALI( NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/I MG/L MG/I MG/L MG/I P
73/03/28 16 15 0000 15.6 21 50 8.10 12 0.040 0.300 0.320 0.012
16 15 0004 15.3 9.3 50 7.80 12 0.030 0.200K 0.340 0.011
16 15 0016 14.0 8.2 70 7.50 15 0.090 0.400 0.690 0.034
73/07/09 17 50 0000 30.9 48 60 8.90 24 0.080 0.800 0.060 0.006
17 50 0006 30.1 9.5 50K 8.50 21 0.080 0.600 0.110 0.010
17 50 0013 28.1 4.4 92 6.90 38 0.390 1.100 0.430 0.035
17 50 0019 25.6 0.9 120 6.80 42 0.580 1.300 0.380 0.030
73/09/18 14 00 0000 25.3 5 39 6.50 10K 0.240 1.000 0.300 0.022
14 00 0005 23.7 4.0 46 6.40 10K 0.250 1.000 0.350 0.046
14 00 0015 23.3 3.6 52 6.40 10K 0.310 1.200 0.420 0.045
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHO5—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P U&/L
73/03/28 16 15 0000 0.066 4.1
16 15 0004 0.062
16 15 0016 0.155
73/07/09 17 50 0000 0.034 13.9
17 50 0006 0.036
17 50 0013 0.108
17 50 0019 C.126
73/09/18 14 00 0000 0.166 1.7
14 00 0005 C.210
14 00 0015 0.264
VALUE KNOWN ro BE
LESS Tf{AN INL)ICuIEL)
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450’.A1
34 10 00.0 0 5 54 30.0 4
SALUDA RIVER
‘ . 5 GREENWOOD Co HWY
0/GREENWOOD LAKE 033592
sr HWY 34 UROG 6 MI E OF NINETY SIX
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DE’ TH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOr
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET P46/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P H&/L
73/02/24 13 30 0.340 0.370 0.105 0.036 0.085
lj/03/21 11 35 0.310 0.310 3.035 0.015 0.0 5
73/04/15 11 65 0.310 0.400 0.085 0.040 0.085
73/05/15 12 30 0.168 0.640 0.038 0.008 0.030
73/06/17 11 ss 0.126 0.890 0.037 0.017 0.030
73/07/15 10 50 0.150 0.190 0.027 0.013 0.030
7j/ .j3/I.1 14 55 0.010K 0.390 0.069 0.010 0.035
7 3/ti9/1l 11 00 0.088 2. 20 0.220 0.011 0.055
7j/ IC/14 11 00 0.100 1.850 0.220 0.005t ’ 0.03
73/IL/Il 11 45 ‘3.252 0.500 C.128 3.028 0.0 0
7j/12/20 10 05 0.33o 0.500 o.120 0.024 0.032
74/01/12 11 ?5 0.32*) 0.500 0.080 0.044 0.130
7’./t 1/ b 11 00 0.430 0.200 ).064 O.0 ?8 0.105
7L,/ 2/ j’ 15 iS 0.500 0.500 3.060 0.030 0.075
K VALUE “ O J Fu
Lt
-------
STu ET RETRIEVAL DATE 7o/04/27
451 4A2
34 23 30.0 082 13 20.u 4
SALUDA RIVER
45 GREENWOOD Co HWY
1/G QELNWOOD LAKE
US HWY 25 IN WARE
I IEPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
0308 2
SHOALS
2111204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
006b5
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2€ .NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
OAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
P4G/L P
MG/L P
73/02/2i.
13
45
0.270
0.160
0.046
0.011
0.035
73/03/21
10
15
0.230
0.255
0.022
0.021
0.010
73/04/15
10
15
0.230
0.135
0.019
0.0 12
0.040
73/05/15
11
00
0.220
0.860
0.029
0.022
0.065
73/Ob/17
10
20
0.252
2.500
0.057
3.020
0.060
73/07/15
09
05
O.2R0
2.100
0.082
0.019
0.0 50
73/08/11
13
35
0.270
0.210
0.019
0.030
0.085
73/39/11
09
30
0.330
0.560
0.046
0.023
0.085
73/1&/14
09
40
0.220
0.150
0.036
0.017
0.060
73/11/17
10
30
).252
0.1SO
0.024
0.028
0.050
7i/1.?/20
08
15
0.336
0.200
0.056
0.032
0.075
74/01/12
09
45
0.290
5.300
0.036
0.152
74/01/26
09
40
0.330
0.4’)O
0.024
0.020
0.125
74/02/12
13
45
0.336
0.800
0.045
0.0 15
0. 07
-------
STONE! RETRIEVAL OATE 76/04/27
450481
34 20 30.0 082 11 30.0 4
flJRKLY CREEK
(iREEN O0D Co H Y
T/G EENwOOD LAPsE 030892
sT p-1 y % 3NDG 4 MI SE OF NAPE SHOALS
11E ’ALLS 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066
DATE TIME DEPTH tJO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FNOM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/24 13 30 0.210 0.250 0.032 0.009 0.030
73/03/21 tO 00 0.210 0.420 0.025 0.015 0.O 0
73/04/15 10 00 0.176 0.100 1 < 0.017 0.012 0.03s
73/05/15 10 45 0.290 0.440 0.033 0.014 0.035
73/05/17 10 05 0.290 1.050 0.069 0.027 0.100
73/07/15 08 65 0.315 0.540 0.016 0.019 0.065
73/08/11 13 20 0.300 0.110 0.010 0.019 0.055
73/09/17 09 15 0.210 0.260 0.044 0.018 0.055
73/10/14 09 25 0.180 0.150 0.018 0.011 0.040
7j/11/17 10 15 0.052 0.1001< 0.016 0.024 0.030
73/12/20 08 15 0.?64 0.300 0.024 3.016 0.050
74/01/12 09 30 0.240 0.300 0.024 0.024 0.065
74/Ot/26 09 25 0.240 0.100 0.020 0.O lb
74/02/12 13 30 0.260 0.700 0.045 0.020 0.075
r., V .LJE t\..t) J Eu dL
LE5S T-i. P’ )IC-IEb
-------
STORIF RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504C1
34 23 30.0 082 Ob 30.0 4
‘4EEL)Y HIV .N
45 LAURENS Co HWY P4
T/GWEENW000 LAKE 030892
ST HWY BNDG 5 Hj WNW OF wATTERLOO
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTpIO
TO DAY FEET HG/L HG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/24 14 0 1.1U0 0.990 0.480 0.240 0.340
73/03/21 10 30 0.880 0.650 0.105 0.072 0.165
73/04/15 10 30 0.940 0.480 3.090 0.160 0.250
73/05/15 11 20 1.200 0.920 0.076 0.240 0.345
73/06/17 10 40 1.300 1.680 0.08’. 0.240 0.320
73/07/15 09 25 1.500 0.760 0.062 0.176 0.255
73/08/11 13 50 1.200 0.695 0.036 0.310 0.490
73/09/17 09 45 0.750 0.700 0.063 0.088 0.192
73/10/14 09 55 1.320 0.700 0.039 0.370 0.490
73/11/17 10 45 1.760 0.750 0.076 0.650 0.780
73/12/20 08 50 1.090 0.900 0.180 0.240 0.360
74/01/12 10 00 1.090 0.700 0.140 0.200 0.315
74/01/26 09 55 1.060 0.800 0.112 0.176 0.370
7’./02/12 14 00 1.300 1.100 0.165 0.230 0.375
-------
sTO LT RET UEvAL UATE 76/04/27
45041)1
34 23 00.0 082 06 30.0 4
A ON CREEK
LAURENS CO HWY M
T/GREENW000 LAKE 03089?
ST HwY 54 BROG 4 P41 NE OF WATERLOO
ILEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0U630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DArE TIME DEPT,1 NO? NO3 TOT KJEL t’4t13-N PrIOSDIS Pr4OS-TOT
F, OM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
10 L)AY FEET MG/L P4G/L MG/L HG/L P MG/L P
73/i2/2’. 14 7 0.420 0.100K 0.025 0.016 0.025
73/03/21 10 40 0.320 0.340 0.020 0.019 0.050
73/04/15 10 40 0.300 0.100K 0.019 0.014 0.035
7j/05/1 11 30 0.410 0.100K 0.015 0.017 0.0’.0
73/06/17 10 50 C.450 1.260 0.035 0.022 0.050
73/07/15 09 35 0.390 0.407 0.043 0.017 0.0 5
73/08/11 14 00 0.360 0.130 0.014 0.028 0.060
73109/17 10 00 0.252 0.255 0.040 0.020 0.060
73/10/14 10 05 0.242 0.100K 0.020 0.013 0.03s
73/11/17 10 55 0.18’. 0.100K 0.016 0.005 0.017
73/12/20 09 05 0.430 0.100 0.020 0.020 0.030
74/01/12 10 15 0.380 0.200 3.020 0.018 0.045
74/01/26 10 05 0.380 0.300 0.028 0.020 0.075
74/U2/12 14 10 0.330 1.400 0.090 0.027 0.080
K V. L ,;: ‘niwN 10 t3F
Lt S iH N I [ )1C 1Eu
-------
ST0 ET ET IEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504F 1
34 17 30.0 082 02 00.0 4
CANE CREEK
45 LAU ENS Co HWY Ii
T/GkEENW000 LAKE 030892
ST HWY 7? W DG 3M! OF C OSSHILL
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-OIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L M6/L MG/L P MG/L
73/02/24 14 45 0.160 0.110 0.042 0.019 0.030
7 /03/21 11 Q5 0.096 0.290 0.016 0.024 0.065
73/04/15 11 00 0.038 0.600 0.038 0.025 0.090
73/05/15 12 00 0.034 0.540 0.093 0.019 0.075
73/06/17 11 30 0.025 1.300 0.030 0.015 0.055
li/GillS 10 20 0.010K 0.560 0.011 0.014 0.080
73/Ob/Il 14 25 0.010K 0.830 0.009 0.016 0.080
73/09/17 10 30 0.016 1.150 0.034 0.010 0.085
73/10/14 10 35 0.072 1.150 0.063 0.017 0.040
73/11/17 11 20 0.016 0.100K 0.016 0.015 0.030
73/12/20 09 35 0.160 0.400 0.024 0.020 0.045
74/01/12 11 00 0.136 0.300 0.020 0.028 0.080
74/01/26 10 35 0.120 0.300 0.020 0.032 0.210
74/02/12 14 3S 0.152 0.900 0.045 0.030 0.130
K ALU r 4OWN ‘U HL
LtS I i ’J INDIC - YEJ
-------
STOi ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504E1
3’. 20 30.0 082 05 30.0 4
LONG LICK tir ANCh
45 LAU ENS Co HWY M
T/G EENwOOD LAKE 030892
ST HWY 307 BRDG 1.5 MI OF WATERLOO
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nui3-N PHOS—IJIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO uAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/24 14 30 0.180 0.100K 0.025 0.021 0.037
73/03/21 10 50 0.140 0.140 0.005K 0.017 0.050
73/04/15 10 50 0.115 0.100K 0.013 0.020 0.045
73/05/15 11 45 0.210 0.100K 0.021 0.029 0.045
73/06/17 11 15 0.250 0.067 0.039 0.070
73/07/15 10 05 0.180 0.400 0.026 0.033 0.060
73/08/11 14 15 0.168 0.110 0.015 0.039 0.070
7j/09/17 10 15 0.154 0.210 0.052 0.040 0.060
73/10/14 10 20 Oe lOO 0.450 0.046 0.035 0.055
73/1L/1 11 05 0.028 0.300 0.012 0.048 0.050
73/12/20 09 20 0.156 0.100 0.012 0.032 0.050
74/01/12 10 40 0.184 0.300 0.020 0.032 0.065
74/01/26 10 20 0.176 0.300 0.016 0.032
74/02/12 14 25 0.224 0.800 0.060 0.035 0.095
K I- LUf ‘ ‘,1OWNJ () t:iL
LLSS 1ri N INL)ICiIEU
-------
STOREI RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504Ab PR4SO4AB
34 39 25.0 082 27 50.0 4
NEST -‘ELIER
‘+5 15 WILLIAMSTON
T/GRLENW000 RESERVOIR
SALIIDA RESERVOIR
IIEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET OE TH CLASS 0(
P001000
030892
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
5005)
50053
DATE
TIME DEPT’-1 N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PNOS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOw
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLO -MGO
TU
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
HC,/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/06/02
14
00
0.126
15.400
7.030
5.870
7.200
0.070
0.080
73/07/03
15
n f l
0.230
24.000
14.700
10.100
12.000
0.090
0.080
73/08/15
16
00
0.310
32.000
15.800
0.135
0.090
0.080
73/01/10
16
00
0.046
34.000
18.100
15.200
16.000
0.085
0.080
73/10/07
16
00
0.040
22.000
11.600
1 1.000
12.000
0.070
0.080
73/12/10
16
00
0.120
24.000
9.800
6.700
9.650
0.065
0.070
74/01/16
16
00
1.000
17.000
3.450
7.150
9.200
0.u80
0.075
74/03/1
16
00
0.040
15.000
0.110
0.130
9.200
0.0 0
0.080
74/o4/14
16
00
1.120
6.600
5.900
3.800
4.700
0.075
0.080
74/06/20
16
00
13.400
1.275
0.157
4.542
10.300
0.070
0.080
74/08/28
16
30
0. 4O
7.000
0.060
0.380
6.100
0.085
0.080
7 ’ +/09/20
16
30
2.525
0.540
1).S00
11.600
0.0Mb
0.080
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504AA PD4 SO4AA P002835*
34 23 25.0 082 13 25.0 4
WARE SHOALS *2
45 GREENWOOD Co HWY
I/LAKE GREENWOOD 030892
SALUDA RIVER
1IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MGD
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST HGD MONTHLY
73/05/31 10 00
CP(T)— 1.887 0.179 1.451 2.600 4.700 4.500
73/06/01 10 00
73/06/30 00 00
CP(T)— 8.700 1.900 0.140 1.580 1.800 3.500 4.800
73/06/30 24 00
73/07/20 09 00 5.700 3.300 0.110 1.400 1.500 5.300 5.000
73/08/17 10 00
CPU)— 3.200 0.240 0.440 1.400 5.900 5.500
73/08/18 10 00
73/09/13 10 30 6.000 2.600 0.110 0.770 1.050 5.500 5.000
73/10/11 10 00 3.990 2.100 0.046 1.260 1.450 5.500 5.000
73/11/08 00 00
CPU)— 4.700 3.600 0.160 1.600 1.700 5.000 5.300
73/11/08 24 00
73/12/07 U0 00
CP(T)— 0.540 5.200 0.036 2.040 2.100 4.900 4.500
73/12/07 24 00
74/01/16 14 30 1.680 2.400 0.040K 2.300 2.300 4.000 3.800
74/02/14 00 00
CP(T)- 0.040 2.700 0.054 2.800 2.800 4.000 3.500
74/02/14 24 00
74/03/24 07 30
CP(T)— 5.520 3.800 0.061 2.650 2.950 4.500 4.000
74/03/15 07 30
K VALUE r OWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDIC4EEL)
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504CA TF45O4CA P115000
34 47 50.0 082 22 00.0 4
(‘REENV ILLE
45 15 GREENVILLI
1/LAKE GREENWOOD 030891
REEDY RIVER
1 IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—O1S PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FRUM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw-MG))
TO DAY FEET HG/L PlG/L NG/L MG/L i HG/L INST MGD MONTHLY
73/05/3! 09 10
CPU)— 0.090 17.000 5.100 4.900 6.500 22.500 18.700
73/06/01 09 10
73/06/28 09 00
CPU)— 0.105 21.000 5.300 6.200 8.000 20.000 22.000
73/06/29 09 00
73/08/14 08 30
CPU)— 0.039 17.600 0.960 6.400 21.200 26.000
73/08/15 08 30
73/08/30 08 30
CP(T)— 22.700 6.600 7.300 9.900 19.700 21.200
73/08/31 08 30
73/09/26 09 00
CPU)— 0.120 25.900 8.650 7.800 9. 00 18.100 25.500
73/v9/27 09 00
73/11/15 11 30
CPU)— 0.130 26.000 4.850 6.650 10.500 33.200 30.700
73/11/16 11 30
73/12/19 10 00
CPU)— 0.440 18.000 0.460 6.400 9.450 23.500 28.000
73/12/20 10 00
74/01/23 15 00
CP(T)— 0.440 20.000 4.500 4.900 7.100 23.100 21.700
74/01/24 15 00
74/02/27 13 30
CPU)— 1.480 19.000 1.500 5.800 7.700 20.100 19.200
74/02/28 13 30
74/05/01 3.800 32.000 5.500 6.800 10.500 20.000 29.000
74/05/16 14 ?0
CPU)— 0.240 28.000 5.750 7.000 9.900 31.700 32.200
74/05/17 14 00
74/06/06 13 00
CP(T)— 0.040 18.000 1.900 4.550 6.300 32.600 33.800
74/06/07 13 00
74/07/11 15 00
CPU)— 0.200 18.000 4.100 4.600 o.60u 23.400 3u.500
74/07/12 15 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450 4B A
34 22 30.0 082 14
WAP4E SHOALS 1
45 G LEN OOO CO HWY
T/LAKE GREENWOOD
TURrc€Y CREE (
1 IEPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
P045048A
10.0 4
P00 1600
030892
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPT 4
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PrIOS—DIS
PrIOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOI—MGD
TO
DAY
FFET
MG/L
HG/I
MG/I
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/06/01
09 00
0.154
6,500
1.080
4.030
4.6 O
0.100
0.100
73/06/30
00 00
CP(T)—
0.045
5.000
0.094
1.440
1.900
0.250
0.250
73/06/30
24 00
73/07/20
10 00
0.220
11.500
0.880
6.600
7.700
0.100
0.150
73/08/17
10 00
0.150
9.600
0.600
2.300
3.750
0e500
0.500
73/09/13
09 30
0.132
12.000
1.160
6.200
7.200
0.500
0.500
73/10/11
10 00
0.120
11.050
1.600
5.300
6.300
0.500
0.500
73/11/07
11 00
0.160
12.500
1.150
5.400
6.300
0.500
0.500
73/12/04
0.180
14.000
0.950
5.200
6.800
74/01/16
09 30
0.360
12.000
1.600
8.200
9.200
0.036
0.0’i0
74/02/13
10 00
0.160
12.000
?.880
7.600
8.900
0.072
0.072
74/03/1’.
08 30
0.168
11.000
.947
2.331
3.16?
O .Q3 ’
0.0’.0
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504’t AP4504 b
3’. 32 35.0 082 28 55.0 4
b LTON
‘ .5 ANDERSON CO riWY
T/LaicE Gr E *OOO
bROAD MOUTp4 CREEK
1 IEPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
P001200
030892
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00b6
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOw
CONDUIT
FPOM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
lG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/06/07
08
30
0.315
12.000
4.600
1.700
3.150
0.225
0.205
73/07/09
10
45
0.220
40.000
21.000
5.110
10.500
0.240
0.210
73/08/15
15
45
0.040
22.000
7.800
3.800
9.600
0.200
0.21
73/0’ /0t
10
tO
3.960
0.205
0.225
73/10/05
10
30
0.040
24.000
14,000
5.800
8.500
0.100
0.190
73/11/13
14
15
0.070
29.000
14.700
5.750
14.500
0.175
0.250
74/01/1t
11
00
0.360
16.500
5.000
4.100
5.700
0.250
0.225
74/02/14
10
00
0.160
15.000
6.600
3.300
4.600
0.300
0.210
74/03/07
08
30
C.080
31.000
13.500
6.300
9.900
0.210
0.210
74/04/10
15
05
0.280
17.000
4.400
2.800
8.100
0.250
0.250
74/O /20
09
15
0.680
13.000
0.940
5.500
7.300
0.180
u.d50
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4504*4 P045 04XA
34 28 20.0 382 22 25.0 4
HONEA PAT -1
45 ANOtRSON Co HWY
T/LAKE GREENWOOD
t P OAO MOUTH CREEK
1 IEPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
P004000
031392
00630
00625
00610
00671
03665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
Will-N
PHOS-DIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOw—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L
INST MGD
MONTHLY
2141204
CLASS 00
73/06/19
09
45
0.750
4.600
2.097
1.900
2.100
0.180
73/07/20
0.690
1.700
0.710
0.840
0.980
0.180
0.180
73/08/24
09
nO
0.660
7.150
1.820
3.060
0.180
0.180
73/09/20
10
30
0.830
2.200
0.550
0.890
1.100
0.180
0.180
73/11/27
09
00
0.360
2.400
1.000
1.200
1.400
0.180
0.180
13/12/18
0.840
3.700
1.000
1.470
2.100
0.180
74/02/22
14
30
0 ,840
3.200
0.770
1.280
1.600
0.180
0.1 0
74/03/20
10
00
0.640
2.600
0.980
2.200
3.100
0.180
0.180
74/04/18
0.720
1.000K
0.320
0.590
0.590
0.180
74/05/24
09
00
0.640
12.000
2.200
2.900
4.400
0.180
74/06/26
09
30
0.635
3.000
0.560
1.650
1.930
74/08/16
09
00
0.760
2.850
0.510
0.050K
1.490
0.180
74/09/30
09
00
0.780
1.500
0.600
0.925
1.150
0.180
Ic V LiJL ‘ Ow i TO til
LESS rti LP L1C ltL)
-------