U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE WINNEBAGO
WINNEBAGO, FOND DU LAC, AND
CALUTCT COUNTIES
WISCONSIN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 57
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
LAIC WINNEBAGO
WINNEBAGO, FOND DU LAC, AND
CALUMET COUNTIES
WISCONSIN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 57
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
WISCONSIN NATIONAL GUARD
JANUARY, 1975
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Wisconsin Study Lakes iv, v
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Introduction 3
III. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
IV. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
V. Nutrient Loadings 11
VI. Literature Reviewed 17
VII. Appendices 18
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration conniitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional , and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)J, clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection A ency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the Wis-
consin National Guard for conduct of the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Francis H. Schraufnagel , Acting Assistant Director, and Joseph
R. Ball of the Bureau of Water Quality, and Donald R. Winter, Lake
Rehabilitation Program, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey. Central Office and District Office per-
sonnel of the Department of Natural Resources reviewed the prelim-
inary reports and provided critiques most useful in the preparation
of this Working Paper series.
Major General James J. Lison, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Wisconsin, and Project Officer CW-4 Donald D. Erickson, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Wisconsin National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF WISCONSIN
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Altoona Eau Claire
Beaver Dam Barron
Beaver Dam Dodge
Big Eau Pleine Marathon
Browns Racine
Butte des Morts Winnebago
Butternut Price, Ashland
Castle Rock Flowage Juneau
Como Walworth
Crystal Vilas
Delavan Walworth
Eau Claire Eau Claire
Geneva Walworth
Grand Green Lake
Green Green Lake
Kegonsa Dane
Koshkonong Jefferson, Rock, Dane
Lac La Belle Waukesha
Middle Walworth
Nagawicka Waukesha
Oconomowoc Waukesha
Okauchee Waukesha
Petenwell Flowage Juneau
Pewaukee Waukesha
Pigeon Waupaca
Pine Waukesha
Poygan Winnebago, Waushara
Rock Jefferson
Rome Pond Jefferson, Waukesha
Round Waupaca
Shawano Shawano
-------
V
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Sinnissippi Dodge
Swan Columbia
Tainter Dunn
Tichigan Racine
Townline Oneida
Trout Vilas
Wapogassett Polk
Wausau Marathon
Willow Oneida
Winnebago Winnebago, Fond Du Lac,
Cal urnet
Wisconsin Columbia
Wissota Chippewa
Yellow Burnett
-------
vi
LAKE
WINNEBAGO
Tributary Sampling
Site
Lake Sampling Site
Direct Drainage Ar
Sewage Treatment
Facility
0
Scale
,/-NJ’
ii
N N E B JL\GO
Wi scons in
::ap L:c tion
-------
LAKE WINNEBAGO
STORET NO. 5554
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and the records of others show that Lake
Winnebago is quite eutrophic.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results show that Lake Winnebago was nitrogen
limited at the time the sample was collected. The lake data
indicate nitrogen limitation at the other sampling times as
well.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—-During the sampling year, Lake Winnebago
received a total phosphorus load at a rate almost twice that
proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as “dangerous”; i.e., a
eutrophic rate (see page 16). Of this load, the point sources
included in this study contributed about 21%. The two largest
sources, the cities of Oshkosh and Fond du Lac, together con-
tributed almost 20% of the total. The Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources has directed both cities to remove phosphorus,
and construction was underway at the City of Oshkosh at the time
of preparation of this report. It is noted that this action is
primarily related to the effect of these sources on Lake Michigan.
-------
2
It is concluded that phosphorus removal at the other point
sources studied would not result in any significant improvement
in the trophic state of Lake Winnebago, since collectively they
only contribute about 1% of the total load.
2. Non-point sources (see page l 5 )--During the sampling year,
the phosphorus exports of Lake Winnebago tributaries were quite
high (mean of 153 lbs P/mi 2 /yr) as compared to Wisconsin streams
studied elsewhere in the Fox River basin; e.g., the mean P export
of Green Lake tributaries was only 58 lbs/mi 2 /yr (see “Report on
Green Lake”, Working Paper No. 39).
It is likely that the high exports are due in part to point
sources outside of the Survey limitst in the Fox River drainage
(Schraufnagle et al., 1967) as well as point sources in the Wolf
River drainage (McKersje et al., 1971).
Assuming complete phosphorus removal at the point sources
included in this study, it is calculated that the mean phosphorus
export of Lake Winnebago tributaries would have to be reduced to
110 lbs/mi 2 /yr to just equal a eutrophic loading rate, and it
appears that a more detailed study is needed to assess the effec-
tiveness of point-source phosphorus control elsewhere in the Lake
Winnebago drainage system, including lakes Poygan* and Butte des
Morts**.
t See Working Paper No. 1, “Survey Methods”.
* Working Paper No. 45.
** Working Paper No. 35.
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Lake Winnebago is the largest lake in Wisconsin and, together with
other water bodies in the Winnebago Pool, is one of the more important
water resources in the State (Sloey and Blum, 1972). The cities of Osh-
kosh, Neenah, Appleton, and Menasha utilize the lake directly as a public
water supply (Schraufnagel, 1974).
Recreational uses of the lake include swimming, boating, waterfowl
hunting, and fishing; game fish present include northern pike, walleyes,
sauger, white bass, and perch, and ice fishing for walleyes and sauger is
said to be very popular during the winter (Weber, et al., 1969).
Public access to the lake is very good with over 20 miles of shore-
line accessible. Boat launching and marinas are available.
-------
4
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryt:
1. Surface area: 137,708 acres.
2. Mean depth: 13 feet.
3. Max. depth: 21 feet.
4. Volume: 1,790,204 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 210 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name _______________ __________
Fox River
Taycheedah Creek
De Neveu Creek
Fond du Lac River
Anderson Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
2. Outlet -
Fox River
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 36.1 inches.
2. Mean annual: 28.9 inches.
± Ball, 1973.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±0.5%; mean daily flows are accurate
within ±40%; mean monthly flows are accurate within ±35%; and normalized
monthly flows are accurate within ±35%.
** Includes area of the lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
See Working Paper No. 1, “Survey Methods”.
Drainage area*
5,580.0 mi
17.8 m1 2
21.3 mi 2
171.0 mi 2
7.9 mi
16.8 mi 2
5,814.8 mi 2
Mean flow*
4,130.0 cfs
6.4 cfs
7.8 cfs
70.0 cfs
2.9 cfs
100.3 cfs
4,317.4 cfs
6,030.0 mi 2 ** 4,317.4 cfs**
-------
5
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Winnebago was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Samples for
physical and chemical parameters were collected from one or more depths
at seven stations in June and nine in August and November (see map, page
vi). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near bottom to surface)
sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification
and enumeration; and during the last visit, two five-gallon depth-integrated
samples were collected for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated
sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 4 feet at stations 1, 2, 3, and 4; 8 feet
at stations 5 and 8; 12 feet at station 6; 6 feet at station 7; and 15 feet
at station 9
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the data
• for the fall sampling period, when the lake essentially was well-mixed,
are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary is based on
all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times,
refer to Appendix B.
-------
6
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
FALL VALUES
(11/09/72)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature (Cent.) 6.0 6.4 6.1 7.0
Dissolved oxygen (m9/l) 9.3 10.7 10.8 11.5
Conductivity ( imhos) 300 357 325 590
pH (units) 7.8 8.0 7.9 8.3
Alkalinity (mg/l) 131 148 139 216
Total P (mg/i) 0.055 0.089 0.087 0.134
Dissolved P (mg/i) 0.030 0.053 0.047 0.096
NO + NO (mg/i) 0.140 0.327 0.240 1.030
Ani onia ?mg/1) 0.280 0.502 0.395 1.330
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches) 12 22 19 44
-------
7
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Number
Date Genera per ml
06/24/72 1. Anabaena 5,317
2. Melosira 1,329
3. Cyclotella 725
4. Dactylococcopsis 362
5. Dinobryon 212
Other genera 816
Total 8,761
08/20/72 1. Anabaena 5,072
2. Melosira 1,667
3. Stephanodiscus 254
4. Dactylococcopsis 217
5. Synedra 109
Other genera 543
Total 7,862
11/09/72 1. Melosira 2,712
2. Cyclotella 452
3. Dinobryon 127
4. Microcystis 108
5. Lyngbya 90
Other genera 435
Total 3,924
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a —
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20
percent.)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/i )
06/24/72 01 133.9
02 119.2
03 59.8
04 75.2
05 36.8
06 50.8
07 151.1
08 -
09
08/20/72 01 8.8
02 2.7
03 50.6
04 50.9
05 22.6
06 16.8
07 61.1
08 23.6
09 7.4
11/09/72 01 24.3
02 9.6
03 43.8
04 25.9
05 52.0
06 35.7
07 18.8
08 22.3
09 25.0
-------
9
Spike (mg/i )
Control
0.006
0.012
0.024
0.060
0.060
10.0 N
b. Stations
Inorganic N
Conc. (mci/i )
0.730
0.730
0.730
0.730
0.730
10.730
10. 730
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
17.5
18.8
18.9
18.8
20.1
56.7
24.8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked —
a. Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 —
Ortho P
___________ Conc. (mg/i )
0.054
P 0.060
P 0.066
P 0.078
P 0.114
P + 10.0 N 0.114
0.054
6, 7, 8, and 9 -
Ortho P
__________ Conc. (mall ) ___________
0.033
0.039
0.045
0.057
0.093
0.093
0.033
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/i ) _________ Conc. (mg/i) ( mg/i-dry wt. )
Control 0.330 9.3
0.006 P 0.330 8.9
0.012 p 0.330 9.7
0.024 P 0.330 9.2
0.060 p 0.330 9.5
0.060 P + 10.0 N 10.330 47.4
10.0 N 10.330 13.1
2. Discussion -
Two samples were collected during the November sampling
period to determine the limiting nutrient for Lake Winnebago.
Sites 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were combined for one assay, and
sites 6, 7, 8, and 9 were combined for the other.
Both assays showed similar results, although a higher yield
of the assay alga, Selenastrum caiDricornutum , was observed for
the sample composited from sites 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Nutrient
levels in the lake showed differences that corresponded with
the differences observed in the assay control yields.
-------
10
In both assays, the lack of significant response to
increased levels of orthophosphorus until nitrogen was also
added indicates Lake Winnebago was nitrogen limited at the
time the samples were collected (note the significant yield
increase when only nitrogen was added). The lake data indi-
cate nitrogen limitation at the other sampling times as well
(N/P ratios were less than 3/1).
D. Trophic Condition:
The morphometry of Lake Winnebago is such that this lake
would probably be considered eutrophic even in the absence of
cultural influences. Since “Winnebago 11 is an Indian name
meaning “stinking or smelly water” (Marx, 1951), it appears the
lake has been eutrophic for a long time.
The lake is considered to be one of the most eutrophic water
bodies in Wisconsin (Lueschow, et al., 1970). Survey limnolo-
gists noted algal blooms in June and August of 1972, and observed
heavy growths of aquatic vegetation in much of the littoral zone
of the lake.
Of the 46 Wisconsin lakes studied in the Survey, 37 had less
mean total phosphorus, 28 had less mean inorganic nitrogen, 41
had greater Secchi disc transparencies, 41 had less mean chloro-
phyll a, and 34 had less algal assay control yield.
-------
11
V. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Wisconsin National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tribu-
tary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the high runoff months
of April and May when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in
September, 1972, and was completed in August, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by the Wis-
consin District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary
sites nearest the lake. The outlet flows were recorded at Rapide Roche
Dam on the Fox River downstream from the outlet but are considered to be
representative of the actual discharge from Lake Winnebago.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were calculated
from mean concentrations and mean flows; however, the Fox River inlet loads
at station A-4 are those measured as outlet loads of Lake Butte des Morts*.
The Fox River outlet and the Taycheedah Creek inlet have two channels; in
both cases nutrient samples were collected from each channel. Nutrient
loadings for these streams were based on the mean concentrations of nu—
trients in both channels and the mean flows.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate drain-
age” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated by using the mean concentrations in
Taycheedah Creek at stations B-l and B-2 and the mean ZZ flow.
* Working Paper No. 35.
-------
12
POp.*
Name Served
Fond du 35,515
La c
N. Fond 3,286
du Lac
Oshkosh 53,221
Stock— 475
bridge
Wisc. Home 600
for Women,
Taycheeda h
2. Industrial — Unknown
Treatment
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter
Primary
Act. sludge
Trickling
filter
t Schraufnagel, et al., 1967.
* 1970 Census.
** Flows estimated at 100 gal/capita/day.
The operators of the Fond du Lac, North Fond du Lac, and Oshkosh waste-
water treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding
flow data. The effluents of the Village of Stockbridge and the Wisconsin
Home for Women at Taycheedah were not sampled, and nutrient loads were
estimated at 2.5 lbs P and 7.5 lbs N/capita/year.
A. Waste Sourcest:
1. Known municipal -
Mean
Flow (mgd )
7 .100
0.605
11.405
0.048**
0.060**
Receiving
Water
Lake Winnebago
Anderson Creek
Fox River
Mud Creek
drain to lake
-------
13
Source _______
a. Tributaries (non—point load) -
Fox River
Taycheedah Creek
De Neveu Creek
Fond du Lac River
Anderson Creek
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) -
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Oshkosh
North Fond du Lac
Fond du Lac
Stockbri dge
Wisc. Home for Women
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Industrial - Unknown
f. Direct precipitation** -
Total
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Fox River 1,198,410
3. Net annual P loss - 48,450 pounds
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbs P/
yr
811 ,270
2,510
2,740
31 ,290
1 ,330
% of
total
70.5
0.2
0.2
2.7
0.1
39,490 3.4
89,060
9,240
138,030
1,190
1 ,500
830
2
21 ,480
1,149,960
7.7
0.8
12.0
0.1
0.1
<0.1
1.9
100.0
* Estimated 1,327 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
14
Source
a. Tributaries (non-point load) —
Fox River
Taycheedah Creek
De Neveu Creek
Fond du Lac River
Anderson Creek
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) —
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Os h ko s h
North Fond du Lac
Fond du Lac
Stockbri dge
Wisc. Home for Women
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Industrial - Unknown
f. Direct precipitation** -
Total
* Estimated 1,327 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbs NI
yr
14,404,140
48,680
48,310
442,340
14,400
% of
total
78.0
0.3
0.3
2.4
0.1
765,330 4.1
489,990
32,730
863,620
3,560
4,500
12,470
2
1,326,680
18,456,750
2.7
0.2
4.7
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
7.2
100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Fox River 15,256,340
3. Net annual N accumulation — 3,200,410 pounds
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary lbs P/mi 2 /yr lbs N/mi 2 /yr
Fox River 145 2,581
Taycheedah Creek 141 2,735
De Neveu Creek 129 2,268
Fond du Lac River 183 2,587
Anderson Creek 168 1,823
-------
16
Units
lbs/acre/yr
grams/m 2 /yr
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Winnebago:
11 Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 0.52
°Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.26
* There was an apparent loss of phosphorus during the sampling year. This
may have been due to unmeasured point sources discharging directly to the
lake or to unsampled tributaries, or it may have resulted from the inter-
mittant back-flushing from Lake Winnebago to Lake Butte des Morts known
to occur during periods of east winds (Sloey, 1970). Also, the loss was
quite small (4%) and could well have been due to the limits of accuracy
of the flow estimates provided by U.S.G.S. (see page 3).
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his dangerous” rate is the rate at which the
receiving water would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his permissib1e” rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would be consid-
ered one between ldangerousu and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be
water bodies with very short retention times.
Total__Phosphorus _________________
Total Accumulated
8.4 loss*
0.94 —
applicable to
Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated
134.0 23.2
15.0 2.6
-------
17
VI. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Ball, Joseph R., 1973. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Bartelle, Steven, and Summer Richman, 1972. Kinetics of orthophos-
phate uptake by phytoplankton populations in Lake Winnebago.
Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sd., Arts, & Ltrs., Vol. 60.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj.
16010 EHR.
Litton, James (Project Leader), et. al., 1972. A comparative investi-
gation of the eutrophication of Green Lake and Lake Winnebago,
Wisconsin. NSF Student—Originated Study, Ripon Coll., Ripon.
Lueschow, Lloyd, James M. Helm, Donald R. Winter, and Gary W. Karl;
1970. Trophic nature of selected Wisconsin lakes. Wisc. Acad.
Sci., Arts, & Ltrs, Vol. 58.
Marx, Andrew J., 1951. Pre-treatment basin for algal removal. Taste
& Odor Contr. Jour., No. 17 (June).
McKersie, Jerome R., Robert M. Krill, James L. Lissack, and Ronald K.
Krueger; 1971. Wolf River pollution investigation survey. Dept.
of Natural Resources, Madison.
Schraufnagel, Francis H., 1974. Personal communication (water-supply
use of Lake Winnebago). Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
________________ L. A. Montie, J. R. McKersie, and Donald Winter;
1967. Report on an investigation of the pollution in the upper
Fox River basin made during 1966 and early 1967. Dept. of Natural
Resources, Madison.
Sloey, William E., 1970. The limnology of hypereutrophic Lake Butte
des Morts, Wisconsin. Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res.
______________ and John L. Blum, 1972. The algae of the Winnebago
Pool and some tributary waters. Wisc. Acad. Sci., Arts, & Ltrs.,
Vol. 60.
Vollenweider, Richard A. (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
Z. Hydrol.
Weber, John J., Paul T. Schultz, Lee 1. Kernen, and C. W. Threinen;
1969. Surface water resources of Fond du Lac County. Dept. of
Natural Resources, Madison.
-------
VH. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN
9/30/74
LAKE CODE 5554
LAKE WINNEBAGO
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE 6030.00
SUR—DRA INAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JUN JUL AUG
SEP OCT
NOV DEC MEAN
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SliM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS =
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
51835.14
50000.00
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
WEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY FLOW
9 72 6900.00
10 72 7200.00
11 72 7500.00
12 72 2800.00
73 6300.00
2 73 7700.00
3 73 12400.00
4 73 13000.00
5 73 15000.00
6 73 9100.00
7 73 3100.00
8 73 2300.00
9 72 5400.00
10 72 7400.00
11 72 6800.00
12 72 4200.00
I 73 5200.00
2 73 4300.00
3 73 15000.00
4 73 14000.00
5 73 18000.00
6 73 10000.00
7 73 3400.00
8 73 2600.00
23 6500.00
21 7000.00
18 8100.00
23 3800.00
24 6700.00
24 15000.00
7 14000.00
5 15000.00
23 4200.00
21 1900.00
25 2100.00
23 4200.00
15 6700.00
12 6800.00
10 4000.00
11000.00
16000.00
12000.00
16000.00
5554A1
6030.00
3800.00
4000.00
48O0.00
6900.00
6000.00
5300.00
4000.00
2700.00
2600.00
3000.00
3300.00
3600.00
4164.11
55 54A4
5580.00
2281.0
2479.5
4463.1
10910.0
6545.9
5256.5
2975.4
2578.6
2876.2
2976.2
3372.1
2876.2
4130.0
5554B1
17.83
1.50
1.60
40.00
17.00
3.60
5.90
1.60
1.20
0.60
0.80
1.40
0.90
6.38
5554C 1
21.30
1.80
2.00
48.00
21.00
4.60
7.40
1.90
1.50
0.80
1.00
1.70
1.20
7.79
555401
171.00
29.00
31.00
260.00
210.00
70.00
110.00
30.00
24.00
12.00
17.00
28.00
18.00
70.02
5554E2
7.92
0.50
0.60
21.00
6.90
1.30
2.00
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.30
2.90
5 554ZZ
232.00
44.00
47.00
340.00
300.00
100.00
170.00
54.00
34.00
18.00
25.00
42.00
28.00
100.25
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
SUMMARY
6030.00
6030.04
5 554A1
5554A4
21
19
14
20
11
11
6
26
14
11
5600.00
18000.00
16000.00
19000.00
6500.00
3200.00
2900.00
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN 9/30/74
LAKE CODE 5554 LAKE WINNEBAGO
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
555481 9 72 14.00 23 24.00
10 72 18.00 1 27.00
11 72 13.00
12 72 4.50 2 5.10
1 73 45.00
2 73 53.00 11 71.00
3 73 100.00 3 92.00
4 73 29.00 7 23.00 23 44.00
5 73 17.00 6 22.00 20 14.00
6 73 7.60 17 5.40
7 73 1.00 8 1.10
8 73 0.80 4 0.70
5554C1 9 72 11.00 23 18.00
10 72 13.00 1 21.00
11 72 10.00
12 72 3.40 2 3.90
1 73 53.00
2 73 61.00 11 82.00
3 73 120.00 3 110.00
4 73 36.00 7 28.00 23 53.00
5 73 22.00 6 28.00 19 19.00
6 73 9.60 17 6.80
7 73 1.30 8 1.40
8 73 1.00 4 0.80
555401 9 72 190.00 23 330.00
10 72 240.00 1 380.00
11 72 180.00
12 72 63.00 2 72.00
1 73 300.00
2 73 340.00 11 460.00
3 73 660.00 3 600.00
4 73 370.00 7 290.00 23 540.00
5 73 340.00 6 440.00 19 290.00
6 73 150.00 17 110.00
7 73 20.00 8 21.00
8 73 16.00 4 13.00
5554E2 9 72 0.30 23 0.50
10 72 0.40 1 0.60
11 72 0.30
12 72 0.10 2 0.10
1 73 24.00
2 73 27.00 11 36.00
3 71 53.00 3 48.00
4 73 12.00 7 9.50 23 18.00
5 73 5.80 6 7.80 19 4.80
6 73 2.60 17 1.90
7 73 0.40 8 0.40
8 73 0.30 4 0.20
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN
9/30/74
LAKE CODE 5554
LAKE WINNEBAGO
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY
5554ZZ
MONTH YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
9
7.
270.00
23
470.00
10
72
330.00
1
540.00
11
72
260.00
12
310.00
l
72
88.00
2
100.00
1
73
340.00
2
73
440.00
11
600.00
3
73
840.00
3
790.00
4
73
500.00
7
400.00
5
73
500.00
6
640.00
6
73
220.00
17
160.00
7
73
30.00
8
31.00
8
73
23.00
4
19.00
15
260.00
21
160.00
18
260.00
10
70.00
23
88.00
23
760.00
19
420.00
20
400.00
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
DATE
TO
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300 00077
DO TRANSP
SECCHI
MG/L INCHES
00094
C N DUCT VY
FIELD
MICROMIIO
555401
43 49 00.0 088 28 00.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
00630
NO2 .NO3
N—TOTAL
MG/L
00610
Nr43N
TOTAL
MG/I
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
7?/06/24 14 ?0 0000
7?/08/20 14 35 0000
14 35 0004
7?/II/09 10 00 0000
1IEPALES
5 0004
FEET DEPT’-4
00400 00410
PH T ALK
CACO3
SU MG/I
00665 00666
PHOS—TOT PHOS—DIS
MG/L P MG/L P
DATE
FROM
TO
7?/O6 24
7?/0A/20
7?/I 1/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 20 0000
14 35 0000
10 00 0000
16.0
12.7
18
290
8.21
140
0.050
0.060
0.06b
0.039
32
315
8.68
112
0.160
0.OP O
0.142
0.082
22.7
6.1
305
8.65
LII
0.110
0.070
0.168
0.082
7.0
10.8
?0
380
7.80
142
0.330
0.300
0.118
0.080
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
133.9J
8 • BJ
24.3J
J V. $Ih- r(NQ vN TO -,
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555402
43 48 30.0 088 27 00.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
IIEPALES 2111202
0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
72/06/24 14 40 0000
72/08/20 14 16 0000
14 14 0004
77/1 1/09 tO 20 0000
5
DEPT H
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
006)0
00665
00666
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T ALK
NO?. .NO3
NH3—N
PHOS-TOT
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N-TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICPOMHO
SU
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
15.6
16
305
350
8.10
8.70
143
124
0.150
0.510
0.110
0.160
0.277
0.301
0.108
0.209
22.9
4.1
510
7.30
163
1.080
1.220
0.944
0.728
7.0
10.4
17
590
8.00
216
1.030
0.300
0.134
0.096
DATE
F P OM
TO
72/06/24
72/03/20
72/11/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 40 0000
14 14 0000
10 20 0000
32217
CHLPPHYL
A
UG/L
I 19.2J
2.7J
9. 6J
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/0’ /30
555403
43 48 30.0 088 24 30.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 ‘USCONSIN
DATE
FROM
TO
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300 00077
DO TRANSP
SECCHI
MG/L INCHES
00094
CNDUC TV V
FIELD
MICROMHO
11EPALES 2111202
0004 FEET
00630
N02&N03
N—TOTAL
MG/L
00610
NH3—N
TOTAL
MG/L
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
72/06/24 15 00 0000
72/08/20 II 35 0000
11 35 0004
72/11/09 10 35 0000
5
00400 00410
P 1-4 TALK
C ACO 3
SO MG/L
DEPT -s
00665 00666
PHOS—TOT PHOS—DIS
MG/L P MG/L P
DATE
FROM
TO
72/06/24
72/08/20
72/I I/OQ
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 00 0000
11 35 0000
10 35 0000
16.8
9.6
20
305
7.20
141
0.240
0.080
0.122
0.109
19
278
8.40
112
0.270
0.140
0.167
0.050
21.2
4.8
300
8.30
122
0.420
0.150
0.173
0.074
7.0
11.0
17
380
8.20
1 4
0.440
0.220
0.105
0.060
3221 7
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
59.8J
50 .6J
43.8J
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/0 /30
555404
43 47 24.0 0 8 26 00.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
1 IEPALES
3
2111202
0002 FEET 0EPT 4
DATE
FR ON
TO
72/06/24
72/08/20
72/11/09
TIME DEPTH
OF•
DAY FEET
15 25 0000
12 00 0000
10 25 0000
32217
C HL R P H YL
A
LJG/L
75.2J
50.9J
25.9J
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCT Y
PH
T ALK
NO2I.N03
NH3—N
PHOS—TOl
PHOS—QIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMNO
S W
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
72/06/24
15 25 0000
17.0
12.4
300
7.P3
149
0.120
0.060
0.220
0.075
77/08/20
12 00 0000
19
340
8.45
130
0.400
0.230
0.231
0.167
12 00 0004
22.4
6.5
325
M .45
134
0.440
0.210
0.274
0.179
7?flI/09
10 25 0000
7.0
11.2
18
460
8.20
190
0.720
0.200
0.115
0.074
J V LU K!’Ot ’J Tul - I Rp ?) J
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/0 /30
555405
44 03 00.0 088 19 36.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
1IEPALES 2111202
3 0010 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
7?/O6/24 17 10 0000
17 10 0010
7?/OR/20 11 00 0000
11 00 0004
11 00 0008
72/11/09 10 55 0000
10 55 0006
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NO2&N03
NH3—N
Pr OS-TOT
Pf-IOS—DJS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
‘IG/L
INCHES
MICROIIHO
SO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MC,/L P
19.3
15.2
12
300
8.80
140
0.060
0.100
0.154
0.112
17.2
10.6
40
305
258
8.53
9.05
142
119
0.060
0.080
0.080
0.030
0.109
0.157
0.079
0.092
22.4
10.5
250
9.05
119
0.090
0.050
0.179
0.107
22.2
9.0
18
255
340
8.98
8.30
119
136
0.080
0.240
0.040
0.130
0.182
0.073
0.100
0.044
6.0
11.5
130
8.30
137
0.240
0.130
0.080
0.043
DATE
FR OH
TO
77/06/24
72/08/20
72/1 1/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
17 10 0000
11 00 0000
10 55 0000
32217
CML RPHYL
A
UG/L
36. SJ
22.6J
52 • 0 J
J V LIJ KNfliI II)
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555406
44 10 00.0 088 18 00.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
I IEPALES 2111202
5 0007 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
7?/06/24 17 50 0000
7?/0B/ 0 10 35 0000
10 35 0004
72/11/09 11 00 0000
11 00 0004
11 00 0012
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
WATEP
00
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALK
N02&NO3
NH3-N
PHOS—TOT
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCrII
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICQOh4HO
SU
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
18.7
16.1
18
43
290
260
.O0
8.90
188
123
0.190
0.070
0.070
0.030
0.067
0.180
0.043
0.139
2?.0
23
258
320
8.90
8.10
121
135
0.060
0.150
0.020
0.130
0.17S
0.087
0.130
0.045
6.1
11.0
320
8.00
135
0.160
0.160
0.089
0.047
6.1
10.8
320
8.00
134
0.140
0.150
0.0 ’ 9
0.045
DATE
F POM
TO
72/06/24
7?/O /2O
72/11/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
17 50 0000
10 35 0000
11 00 0000
32217
CHL RPM VI
A
UG/L
50.RJ
16.8J
35.7J
-------
STORET PETRIFVAL DATE 74/09/30
555407
44 11 00.0 088 26 00.0
LAKE WINNEBAGO
55 WISCONSIN
1 IEPALES 2111202
5 0011 FEET DFPTI-I
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTN
OF
DAY FEET
72/06/24 18 25 0000
18 25 0010
72/08/20 OR ?O 0000
08 20 0006
77/11/09 10 45 0000
10 45 0006
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
WATER
DO
TPANSP
CNDIJCTVY
P -4
T ALP(
N02&N03
NH3—N
PHOS-TOF
PF-40S—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
‘IG/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
MG/L
P4G/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
15.4
20
280
9.00
130
0.060
0.080
0.287
0.137
9.8
18
280
258
8.70
9.10
133
119
0.050
0.090
0.080
0.060
0.054
0.253
0.030
0.143
9.6
24
260
300
9.05
7.90
121
132
0.120
0.150
0.070
O.?O0
0.234
0.088
0.132
0.055
10.9
300
7.90
131
0.170
0.210
0.098
0.061
19.0
17.7
23.8
6.0
322]?
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
151. U
6] .IJ
18.8J
DATE
FROM
To
72/06/24
77/08/20
72/11/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
18 75 0000
08 20 0000
10 45 0000
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555408
44 05 00.0 088 32 00.0
WIN ’1E AGO LAKE
55039 WISCONSIN
I IEPALES 2111202
6 0010 FEET DEPTi-
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTh
OF
DAY FEET
7?/OR/20 15 00 0000
15 00 0004
35 00 0008
7?/11/09 II 45 0000
31 45 0008
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
Ph
T ALK
NO2 .NO3
Nr13-N
PhOS-TOF
PHOSDIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICPOMHO
SU
MG/I
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
7.0
20
260
270
8.65
8.55
13?
125
0.300
0.090
0.140
0.120
0.101
0.084
0.037
0.039
6.1
18
275
350
8.60
7.80
126
152
0.070
0.370
0.130
0.080
0.092
O.06’
0.033
0.030
9.3
360
7.80
152
0.390
0.100
0.055
0.033
23.6
23.5
6.2
322 17
C HLRPH Y L
A
UG/L
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
7?/08/20 15 00 0000 23.6J
72/31/09 II 45 0000 22.3J
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/30
555409
44 15 00.0 088 30 00.0
WINNEBAGO LAKE
55039 WISCONSIN
11EPALES 2111202
6 0020 FEET DEPTH
DATE
F POM
TO
TI’4E DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
72/08/20 15 25 0000
15 25 0004
15 25 0015
72/11/09 11 25 0000
11 25 0004
11 25 0014
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
WATER
00
TRAWSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALt(
NO?&N03
?‘1H3—N
PHOS—TOT
PHOS—OTS
TEP4P
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
PAICPOMHO
SU
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
9.7
44
283
280
8.90
8.90
131
131
0.090
0.070
0.080
0.060
0.091
0.090
0.057
0.054
6.3
21
290
320
8.62
7.90
132
143
0.080
0.240
0.070
0.160
0.163
0.072
0.107
0.046
10.6
320
7.90
139
0.230
0.160
0.078
0.047
10.6
320
7.90
139
0.230
0.170
0.082
0.048
22. 1
21.4
6.1
6.0
32217
CHLPPHYL
A
hG /1
DATE
FROM
TO
TI qr DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
72/08/20 15 25 0000 7.4J
72/11/09 11 25 0000 25.OJ
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOPFT RETP!EVAL DATE. 74/10/0?
5554A] LS55 +A1
44 1? 00.0 0RR 27 30.0
NEENAH CHA JNEL OF FO PIVER
55 15 NP NAH
0/LAKE WINNE8AGO
ST - Y 114 ‘NO(, TO D0T IN NEENA -4
11E ALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO NO3 TOT KJ L NH3—N PHOS —1)IS PHOS—Tor
FROM ‘)F N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTH()
TO ‘)AY FFET M’ ,/L 1G/L MO/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/21 09 55 0.290 2.000 0.? 0 0.0 5 0.300
72/10/21 09 00 0.2 OR 7.050 0. ?O 0.094 0.235
72/11/18 0’ 30 0.130 2.600 0.?10 0.056 0.100
7?/12/2 OB 40 0.960 0.150 0.04? 0.069
71/01/20 09 30 0.240 1.6 0 0.180 0.005K 0.200
71/02/24 00 30 0.336 0 .930 0.012 0.01 0.065
71/O3/? 09 45 0.4”0 1.50 fl.08P 0.019 0.195
71/04/07 09 15 0.315 1.470 0.030 0.007 0.060
71/04/21 0 4 30 0. 4B0 1.500 0.010 0.024 0.155
73/05/05 OQ 30 0.100 0.R?0 0.006 0.012 0.045
71/05/1 09 00 1.760 0.027 0.024 0.130
71/06/21 10 00 0.231 1. 00 O.12 0.066 0.090
71/07/?1 0 40 0.042 1.900 0.105 0.029 0.11
71/0 /? , 08 10 0.072 1.600 0.014 O.0 6 0.230
-------
STOPET - [ TR1EVAL DATE 74/10/02
555442 LSSS S4A2
44 11 30.0 088 27 30.0
‘lEc.IASHA C-IANFL OF FOX RIVER
55 15 NEENAH
0/LAKE WINNE8A( O
ST HWY 114 HRD( DOTY ISLANDTO MANASI-jA
J 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DAtE TIMF DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJSL NH 3—N PHDS—PIS PHOS—TOT
FPOM OF J—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L lG/L -16/L MG/L P MG/L P
7?/09/?3 09 1E 0.322 2.000 0.325 0.050 0.294
72/10/21 08 30 0.150 2.150 0.147 0.0Th 0.270
7?/1l/1’ 08 co 0.110 1.200 0.115 0.046 V.034
7?/l?/?3 09 10 0.176 1.000 0.147 0.03 0.066
71/01/?0 09 45 0.231 1.150 0.147 0.039 0.055
71/02/24 1’) 00 0.320 0.830 0.009 0. O lf 0.060
71/03/?4 10 15 0.?52 1.680 0.ORP 0.009 0.25’)
71/04/07 09 45 0.400 1.150 0.021 0.009 0.070
71/04/21 08 30 0.480 1.260 0.02) 0.026 0.155
71/05/05 10 00 0.090 0.840 0.007 0.012 0.045
71/05/1 08 30 0.0Th 1.540 0.086 0.023 0.105
71/06/23 09 30 0.200 1.150 0. I OL 0.OM 0.095
71/07/21 QQ 30 O.0 S ?.J00 0.071 0.042 0.180
73/08/2 09 30 0.048 I.6?0 0.020 0.105 0.230
-------
STOP T RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5554A3 LS5554A3
44 01 00.0 08P 32 30.0
FO RIVER
55 15 OSHKOSH
1/LAKE WINNF 4AGO
ST HWY 175 PD6 IN OSI-lKOSr4 BELOW STP
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TI’AE DEPTH NO? NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM (W N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L 1G/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/23 09 00 0.326 1.500 0.?97 0.054 0.105
72/10/15 L3 40 0.140 1.600 0.150 0.025 0.126
72/11/1? 13 35 0.320 1.050 0.014 0.023 0.063
72/12/10 10 45 0.570 1.150 0.077 0.022 0.054
73/01/13 14 15 1.200 1.050 0.130 0.040 0.065
71/O?/l1 13 45 0.970 1.100 0.079 0.036 0.075
73/03/11 13 30 0.790 0.?73 0.062
73/04/01 08 30 0.790 0.960 0.019 0.007 0.060
71/04/14 14 30 0.147 O.R60 0.010 0.011 0.0,7
71/05/06 08 00 0.052 1.150 0.040 0.017 0.065
73/05/20 13 15 0.015 1.260 0.020 0.01 0.07,
73/06/26 11 30 0.03? i.coo 0.04P 0.034 ).105
71/07/14 13 15 0.010K 2.200 0.026 0.039 0.150
73/0 /11 09 00 0.010K 2.500 0.056 0.03B 0.195
K VuLU rcNO N TO 4E LESS
THAN INDLC&TE)
-------
STORET PETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5554A4 5508A 1
44 02 00.0 088 34 00.0
FOX NIVEN
55 15 OSr*(OSH
1/LAIKE WINNEBAGO
St MWY 21 4RDG IN OSH (OSH ABOVE SIP
11FPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTII
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DE T -f NO2 .NO3 TOT KJFL N I I3-N PhOS—DIS kOS—IOT
FRO’ l OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L C’/L MG/I M( /L P
7?1O9/23 09 25 0.143 1.600 0.210 0.04? 0.110
72/10/15 14 00 0.150 1.600 0.105 0.070 0.110
72/11/12 13 55 0.110 1.260 0.038 0.017 0.069
7?/1 /10 11 20 0.600 0. 9 ,0 0.026 0.017 0.046
71/01/13 13 45 1.190 0.940 0.110 0.026 0.055
71/02/11 14 70 0.930 1.000 0.071 0.042 0.075
71/03/11 14 00 0.760 1.540 0.455 0.049 0.163
71/04/01 0 4 35 0.330 1.300 0.016 0.007 0.055
71/04/14 14 45 0.138 0.840 0. OOR 0.008 0.050
73/0s/0 38 25 0.060 1.000 0.027 0.017 0.06s
71/05/20 13 30 0.010K 1.490 0.023 0.013 0.065
73/06/2 ” 11 10 0.011 1. 500 0.190 0.0?7 0.100
73/07/14 13 30 0. O I O I K 1.9B0 3.029 0.042 0.155
71/08/11 09 30 0.O1 O I K 2.520 ‘1.017 0.037 0.200
IK VALUE
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
555481 LS5554B1
43 48 30.0 088 24 00.0
EAST OUTLET OF TAYCHEEDAt-t CREE (
55 15 FOND DU LAC
T/LAPcE WINNEBAGO
US 151 BRDG AT TAXCrIEEDAH
I1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO? .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3- PHOS—1)TS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—IOTAL N TOTAL O THO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/I MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/23 16 70 0.160 1.500 0.?10 0.048 0.252
72/10/01 15 40 0.610 1.700 0.105 0.140 0.250
7?/11/04 14 IS 1.400 1.540 0.105 0.093 0.210
7?/I?/02 LO 50 4.750 0.970 0.063 0.086 0.132
73/01/07 08 55 5.500 1.050 0.126 0.120 0.160
73/02/11 10 30 6.200 0.390 0.046 0. OAQ 0.115
71/03/03 14 15 7.000 4.100 1.300 0.395 0.610
71/04/07 11 15 3.100 1.050 0.020 0.042 0.090
71/04/23 14 15 1.200 1.500 0.005K 0.063 0.200
73/05/06 14 45 2.300 1.?00 0.028 0.048 0.095
71/05/20 12 25 1.200 1.260 0.019 0.025 0.080
73/06/17 13 30 1.160 1.470 0.090 0.126 0.220
73/07/0 10 45 0.026 1.320 0.036 0.071 0.125
73/08/04 11 10 0.4?O 2.000 0.030 0.080 0.190
K s\LU NO N T3 r LESS
TH ’ INDICATFu)
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL OATF 14/10/02
5554f32 LS555’.f3?
43 48 00.0 08? 25 30.0
wEST OUTLET OF TAYCPiEEDAr CREEK
55 1’i FOND DU LAC
T/LAKE WINNEE 1AGO
us 151 BRUG .15 MI NI FON DU LAC
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPT’-IO
TO DAY FEET MG/L UG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
7?/0 /?3 16 00 0.130 1.400 0.19f 0.060 0.252
72/10/01 15 00 0.970 1.550 0.100 0.147 0.190
7?/11/04 14 25 3.500 1.150 0.034 0.097 0.132
72/12/02 10 10 3.500 1.100 0.064 0.055
71/01/07 11 00 5.500 1.150 0.126 0.100 0.135
71/03/03 1? 30 2.200 5.000 1.700 0.460 0.b83
71/04/07 11 45 1.900 1.320 0.042 0.039 0.160
73/04/23 11 15 1.840 2.110 0.069 0.082 0.195
73/05/06 15 30 3.200 1.470 0.079 0.058 0.145
71/05/19 1? 15 ‘.200 2.000 0.052 0.033 0.118
71/06/17 14 00 2.300 2.700 0.13P 0.110 0.195
71/07/08 10 15 1.600 1.470 0.060 0.05 0.165
73/0e /04 14 30 0.252 1.980 0.140 0.100 0.210
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5554C1 LSSS54C I
43 48 00.0 088 24 00.0
DE NEVEU CREEK
55 15 FOND DU LAC
T/LAK WINNEBAGO
US 151 BRDG NE EDGE OF
1 IEPALES
4
FOND DU LAC
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO &NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
Pp-,OS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
iG/L
MG/L
M(/L P
MG/L P
72/09/23
16
00
0.1’ 0
1.250
0.112
0.056
0.300
72/10/01
14
30
0.700
1.050
0.075
O.14R
0.260
72/11/04
15
45
1.920
1. 200
0.075
0.126
0.189
72/12/02
09
30
3.100
1.150
0.031
0.0 2
0.140
73/01/07
10
20
2.100
1.300
0.160
0.069
0.115
73/02/11
10
20
3.100
1.050
0.13?
0.O 2
0.125
73/03/03
15
00
1.660
3.900
1.260
0.310
0.510
73/04/07
10
30
1.6 00
0.730
0.010
0. 1J63
0.110
73/04/23
13
45
1.420
1.700
0.013
0.086
0.150
73/05/06
14
00
1.620
3.100
0.110
0.054
0.095
73/05/19
1?
07
1.540
1.380
0.030
0.026
0.055
73/06/17
13
00
1.840
1.600
0.O5
0.137
0.208
71/07/03
10
30
0.620
0.980
0.044
0.056
0.120
73/0 3/04
13
15
0.710
2.100
0.105
0.072
0.135
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL D4TE 74/10/02
555401 LS5554 01
43 47 30.0 088 27 00.0
FOND DU LAC RIVER
55 15 FOND D l i LAC
T/LAtcE WINNEBAGO
US 45/SCOtT ST BROG N EDGE FOND D i i LAC
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FfET DEPTH
00630 006?5 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DE TH NO2&NO3 TOT KJEL NI-13-N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L 4G/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L ?
72/09/23 16 00 0.151 1.450 0.210 0.030 0.336
72/10/01 15 00 0.890 1.400 0.140 0.147 0.220
72/11/04 14 30 1.440 1.760 0.07? 0.110 0.16 .3
72/12/02 10 00 1,040 1.400 0.046 0.042 0.0 0
71/01/07 11 10 5.500 0.9?0 0.09? 0.115 0.150
71/02/11 10 00 0.980 1.320 0.069 0.054 0.090
71/01/03 13 30 2.100 4.000 1.500 0.370 0.610
71/04/07 10 45 1.060 1.000 0.037 0.039 0.085
71/04/23 13 30 0.840 1.680 0.056 0.097 0.200
71/05/06 14 30 0.755 1.400 0.032 0.077 0.125
71/05/1 1? 43 0.430 1.400 0.026 0.110 0.150
73/06/17 14 15 1.380 3.400 0.190 0.480 0.600
73/07/0.3 10 00 1.660 1.350 0.0 2 0.198 0.250
71/0.3/04 14 15 1.500 ?.725 0.100 0.023 0.110
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5 554E1 LSSS54E1
43 50 00.0 088 29 00.0
ANDERSON CREEK
55 15 FOND DU LAC
1/LAKE WINNEBAGO
CO RD .75 MI N OF FOND
1 1EPALES
4
DU LAC
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02F,.N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAl.
N
TOTAL
OPTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
‘IG/L
MG/L
P4G/L P
MG/L p
7?/OQ/?3
15
30
0.265
1.?00
0.?05
0.030
0.399
72/10/01
15
00
0.420
1.300
0.130
0.260
0.320
7?/11/04
15
15
0.630
1.540
0.081
0.168
0.252
72/12/02
11
00
1.060
1.680
0.198
0.066
0.110
73/01/07
09
55
1.680
1.400
0.168
0.126
0.190
73/02/10
14
30
0.780
1.150
0.168
0.160
0.200
71/03/03
11
30
2.000
5.300
2.000
0.440
0.560
71/04/07
11
30
0.420
0.960
0.040
0.058
0.090
71/04/23
14
00
0.360
?.000
0.037
0.138
0.200
71/05/06
14
15
0.480
2.460
0.080
0.140
0.220
71/05/19
13
11
0.019
2.200
0.026
0.058
0.115
73/06/17
13
15
0.028
1.600
0.063
0.084
0.155
71/07/0
Ii
00
0.070
1.800
0.113
0.088
0.220
-------
STDPET RETRIEVAL D&TF 74/10/02
5554E? LS5554E2
43 50 00.0 088 28 00,0
ANDERSON CREEK
55 15 FOND DU LAC
1/LAKE WINNEBAGO
CO t) .75 MI NE OF NORTr FOND DU LAC
1 IFPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2&N03 TOT NJEL NH3-N PHOSOIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/23 15 00 0.1 ’. 1.200 0.120 0.049 0.370
72/10/01 15 00 0.385 1.200 0.154 0.220 0.300
72/11/04 15 e5 0.600 1.260 0.04? 0.154 0.240
72/12/0? 10 20 0.440 1.3’O 0.?20 0.04P 0.110
73/01/07 09 20 2.300 ?.300 0.240 0.150 0.290
71/02/li 11 00 0.RQ O 1.570 0.320 0.154 0.240
73/03/03 11 45 2.020 4.800 2.100 0.500 0.630
71/04/07 11 00 0.470 1.050 0.050 0.056 0.095
71/04/23 13 00 0.315 1.700 0.046 0.130 0.195
73/05/06 15 00 0.460 2.100 0.110 0.100 0.195
71/05/19 13 73 0.065 1. 6O 0.065 0.063 0.160
73/06/17 13 45 0.039 1.380 0.027 0.126 0.270
71/07/08 11 30 0.019 1.600 0.035 0.110 0.280
73/08/04 13 45 0.015 ?.600 0.066 0.080 0.220
-------
ST0 ET RETRIEVAL i)ATE 7’+/09/30
555450 TF555450 P035515
43 48 00.0 088 26 30.0
CITY OF FOND DU LAC
55039 15 FOND DU LAC
0/LAKE WINNEBAGO
LAKE WINNEBAGO
LIEPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME OEPTH r’lO? .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PrIOS—DIS PHOSTOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE F LOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET ‘40/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
73/01/11 00 00
CP(T)— 0.500 45.000 27.000 3.900 4.700 7.100 7.380
71/02/01 24 00
73/02/28 00 00
CP(T)— 0.075 56.000 35.000 4.400 6.500 6.620 6.550
71/02/28 24 00
73/03/30 00 00
CP(T)— ‘1.035 41.000 22.500 3.700 5.500 8.270 8.930
73/03/31 24 00
73/04/30 00 00
CP(T)— 0.050 31.000 12.000 4.100 6.300 8.380 9.220
73/04/3O 24 00
73/05/31 00 00
CP(T)— 0.086 27.300 10.610 3.820 5.900 9.600 10.400
73/05/31 24 00
73/06/30 00 00
CP(T)— 0.030 18.700 10.800 7.900 11.500 5.420 6.840
73/06/30 74 00
71/07/31 00 00
CR17)— 0.029 54.000 31.960 4.700 7.950 6.080 - 5.320
73/07/31 24 00
73/08/31 00 00
CP(T)— 0.0?8 47.000 5.900 7.100 6.320 5.890
73/08/31 24 00
71/10/0? 00 00
CP(T)— 0.050 43.000 38.000 0.510 5.000 6.360 5.610
71/10/07 24 00
71/10/31 00 00
CP(T)— 0.050 49.000 31.000 0.345 5.400 7.300 6.280
71/10/31 ‘4 00
71/11/30 00 00
CP(T)— 0.010K 49.000 25.200 0.410 6.000 6.070 5.680
73/l1/3t 74 00
71/12/11 00 vO
CP(T)— 0.200 25.000 12.600 0.280 1.400 4.770 5.840
71/17/31 ?4 00
K VALUF KNOWN TO 8E LESS
THAN INDICATED
-------
555450 TF55545O
43 48 00.0 088 26 30.0
CITY OF FOND DU LAC
55039 15 FOND DO LAC
U/LAKE W1NNEB GO
LAKE WINNEBAGO
1 1EPALES
4
7L / 1/1 cC ía
C ( T) —
7L./r)/ 2L. C,
2 .
0.140
2.500 8.750
6.210
ST )P T ETRjEvAj D”TF 74/0 i/.3U
TE
Q U
TO
I ‘)E TH
O .
fl F Ri
P035515
2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH
O( ;
‘ ‘JOT
O Oh?S
TOT KJEL
fl0 1O
NH3—N
00571
PHOS—DIS
00f S
PHOS—1OT
50051
FLOw
50053
CONDUIT
i-TOTAL
IOT L
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
‘l(fL
MG/L
MUlL
MU/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
-------
STORET 8ETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/JO
FIS SL,451
4 ‘50 tiO.li 0 ë 30.0
CF FY UF J F )t Jt) DU LAC
L 5 15 FO JI) I)t) L C
T/LA#cE wI JF ’ A’1 O
A.’JI) SUN C EEr(
11 1Y’AL I S 21L.12 1 J4
0000 FI ET DFPT -i
00630
00625
00610
00671
00E 6S
50051
50051
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO7 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PI-40S—DIS
H0’—10T
FL0
COi’J)UIt
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
tOTAL
ORTHO
A 1t
FLOw—M(,i)
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
Mr,/L P
INST 1)
IONTHLY
73/01/03
09 00
CP(T)—
1.020
12.800
0.044
1.790
4.950
0.7?8
0.450
73/01/03
16 30
73/02/OS
09 00
CP(T)—
0.525
17.600
1.900
0.760
7.100
0.572
0.612
73/02/05
16 30
73/03/05
09 00
CP(T)—
1.200
12.000
0.185
0 .250
6.200
0.864
0.530
73/03/05
16 30
73/05/0&
09 00
CP(T)—
0.910
9.200
0.064
0.480
2.400
(1.856
0.750
71/05/OR
16 30
73/06/12
09 00
CP(T)—
0.210
21.000
5.200
2.400
5.?30
0.557
0.767
73/06/12
16 30
73/07/18
09 00
CPU)—
0.130
25.200
8.300
0.350
4.100
0.4 7
0.575
73/07/18
16 00
73/08/01
08 30
CPU)—
0.250
18.000
4.400
1.100
4 .58C)
0.46P
0.506
71/08/01
16 30
73/09/21
09 00
CP(T)—
0.120
19.000
8.600
3.200
.eoci
0.497
0.575
71/09/21
16 00
73/10/09
09 00
CP(T)—
0.290
22.000
9.700
4.100
6.300
0.576
0.713
73/10/09
16 00
73/11/09
09 00
CP(T)—
0.260
20.000
6.800
0.910
3.200
0.504
0.550
71/11/09
16 00
73/12/11
09 00
CP(T)—
1.200
23.000
3.800
1.890
4.600
0.438
0.630
73/12/lI
16 30
74/02/07
09 00
CP(T)—
0.640
15.000
1.800
0.650
3.750
(1.575
u.580
74/02/07
16 00
-------
ST’) ET ETPIEVAL e)4T’ 14/C)’- /U.)
55 4S? S55452
44 01 00.0 0P 33 0.0
CITY OF OSHKOSH
55 15 OSr4KOSH
T/LtUcE WINNERAGO
FO R1VE
ALES
P053221
214120’+
0000 FEET DEPTH
0 630
Oub2S
00# 1O
00671
00665
50051
50051
fl TF
TI’ E
DL TH
‘iO’ ’Oi
TOT KJEL
Nr13—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOw
CONDUIT
F ’ )M
()F
J—fflTAL
N
TOTAL
(JPTHO
RATF
FLOw—MGD
TO
AY
Fr T
G/L
:- /L
1c,/L
MG/L P
M(,/L P
INST M31)
MONTHLY
77/I7/2 ’
U
110
1.900
?.300
9.120
7 /01/7’
)9
)0
1.0 ,
15.u O O
0.910
2.000
,.70u
11.430
11.200
73/o7/?7
J’
00
1.4 O
19. o O O
5.700
o.is
2.000
10.000
10.300
73/13/ 7
0
‘,
1.05)
Q. ’0°)
0 ,07 9
2.050
15.900
15.700
71/04/?4
OR
Oh
).6’-e’ l
9.6 0
0.075
0.127
2.100
14.400
14.400
73/Oc/30
0
00
7.64)
6. 00
0.049
0.R50
2.300
16.100
16.100
73/06f?
‘)
00
i,.2 O
l 1.’u O
1.H)0
0.400
2.99)
11.500
12.600
71/07/7 -
U 4
(jO
. ?J
11.500
1.?60
0.060
1.450
10.500
9.650
71f3 /?’4
03
0
16.tiJO
0.340
2.100
10.200
Y. 00
71/09/26
0
l 0
14.70t,
4.000
2.300
1.100
Y.3 0
.760
71/1’W?
jo
•.o17
?1.O0
7.?00
0.330
2.304)
3.440
.910
73/11/2
O
00
1.76)
19.00’l
O.0 44
0.570
3.200
9.540
R.710
7 /I’/ 1
( 0
“i. .0o
4.700
0. 20
1.400
7.370
M.750
------- |