U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE WISCONSIN
COLUMBIA AND SAUK COUNTIES
WISCONSIN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 58
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
WISCONSIN NATIONAL GUARD
NOVEMBER, 1974
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Wisconsin Study Lakes iv, v
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Introduction 3
III. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
IV. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
V. Nutrient Loadings 10
VI. Literature Reviewed 16
VII. Appendices 17
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration comitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning 1 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the Wisconsin
National Guard for conduct of the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
Francis H. Schraufnagel, Acting Assistant Director, and Joseph
R. Ball of the Bureau of Water Quality, and Donald R. Winter, Lake
Rehabilitation Program, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey. Central Office and District Office per-
sonnel of the Department of Natural Resources reviewed the prelim-
inary reports and provided critiques most useful in the preparation
of this Working Paper series.
Major General James J. Lison, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Wisconsin, and Project Officer CW-4 Donald D. Erickson, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Wisconsin National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF WISCONSIN
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Altoona Eau Claire
Beaver Dam Barron
Beaver Dam Dodge
Big Eau Pleine Marathon
Browns Racine
Butte des Morts Winnebago
Butternut Price, Ashland
Castle Rock Flowage Juneau
Como Walworth
Crystal Vilas
Del avan Walworth
Eau Claire Eau Claire
Geneva Walworth
Grand Green Lake
Green Green Lake
Kegonsa Dane
Koshkonong Jefferson, Rock, Dane
Lac La Belle Waukesha
Middle Walworth
Nagawicka Waukesha
Oconomowoc Waukesha
Okauchee Waukesha
Petenwell Flowage Juneau
Pewaukee Waukesha
Pigeon Waupaca
Pine Waukesha
Poygan Winnebago, Waushara
Rock Jefferson
Rome Pond Jefferson, Waukesha
Round Waupaca
Shawano Shawano
-------
V
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Sinnissippi Dodge
Swan Columbia
Tainter Dunn
Tichigan Racine
Townline Oneida
Trout Vilas
Wapogassett Polk
Wausau Marathon
Willow Oneida
Winnebago Winnebago, Fond Du Lac,
Cal umet
Wisconsin Columbia
Wissota Chippewa
Yellow Burnett
-------
sconsin
Location
— — Juneau_Co. _____
SaukCo. — _____
LAKE WISCONSIN
X Lake Sampling Site
® Tributary Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
. )Direct Drainage Area Limits
01 2 3 s ioMl.
Scale
Columbia Co . — _____
Dane Co.
U
-------
LAKE WISCONSIN
STORET NO. 5555
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Lake Wisconsin is eutrophic.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results were affected by a change in nutrient
proportions (see discussion, page 8). The lake data indicate
phosphorus limitation in November but nitrogen limitation in June
and August.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—-During the sampling year, Lake Wisconsin
received a total phosphorus load at a rate about six times that
proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as dangerous”; i.e., a
eutrophic rate (see page 15). Of this load, it is calculated
that the point sources within the Survey limit* contributed about
4%. If only these sources were considered, it would be concluded
that point-source phosphorus control would not appreciably improve
the trophic condition of Lake Wisconsin. However, there are numer-
ous point sources in the drainage beyond the 25-mile limit of the
Survey , and a study of broader scope is needed to assess the
effectiveness of phosphorus control in the drainage.
* See Working Paper No. 1, “Survey Methods .
t McKersie, et al., 1972.
-------
2
2. Non-point sources (see page l5)--The phosphorus exports
of the streams tributary to Lake Wisconsin were quite high (par-
ticularly the Baraboo River) and probably are indicative of the
unmeasured point sources noted above.
Whether effective control of the phosphorus now reaching
Lake Wisconsin can be achieved is problematical in view of the
very high drainage area to lake area ratio of about 644 to 1.
The mean phosphorus export of the tributaries to the lake (in-
cluding point sources) would have to be reduced to about 22 lbs/
mi 2 /yr to achieve a loading rate just equal to Vollenweider’s
eutrophic rate.
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Lake Wisconsin is an impoundment of the Wisconsin River near Prairie
du Sac which was created in 1914 by the Wisconsin Power and Light Com-
pany as a source of hydroelectric power (Martin and Hanson, 1966).
The reservoir has public access and supports a game fish population
which includes muskellunge, northern pike, walleyes, largemouth bass, and
panfish (Ball, et al., 1971).
Aquatic weeds and phytoplankton have caused some problems in the
reservoir in the past; however, the last known chemical treatment for
weed control was in 1962, and a small area was chemically treated to
control algae in 1970 (Lueschow, 1972).
-------
4
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryt:
1. Surface area: 8,900 acres.
2. Mean depth: 6 feet.
3. Maximum depth: 24 feet.
4. Volume: 53,400 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 4 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries —
Name ______________ __________
Wisconsin River (A—2)
Baraboo River
Rowan Creek
Spring Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - -____________ _______
Totals
2. Outlet -
Wisconsin River
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 42.7 inches.
2. Mean annual : 30.7 inches.
t Ball, 1974.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±0.5%; mean daily flows are accurate
within ±40%; mean monthly flows are accurate within ±35%; and normalized
monthly flows are accurate within ±35%.
** Includes area of lake.
See Working Paper No. 1.
Drainage area*
8,130.0 mi 2
600.0 mi 2
45.3 mi
45.6 mi 2
Mean flow*
6,824.2 cfs
358.0 cfs
31.6 cfs
31.7 cfs
115.2
8,936.1
mi 2
m1 2
67.9
7,313.4
cfs
cfs
8,950.0 mi 2 **7,313.3 cfs
-------
5
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Wisconsin was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, sam-
ples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from three sta-
tions on the lake and generally from two or more depths at each station
(see map, page vi). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (15 feet
or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the last visit,
a single five-gallon depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays.
Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the
stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 21
feet at station 1, 9 feet at station 2, and 4 feet at station 3.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the
data for the fall sampling period, when the lake was essentially well-
mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary is
based on all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times,
refer to Appendix B.
-------
6
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
FALL VALUES
(11/10/72)
Parameter Minimum Mean Median Maximum
Temperature (Cent.) 5.8 6.1 5.8 7.0
Dissolved oxygen (mg/i) 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.9
Conductivity (umhos) 140 148 150 155
pH (units) 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.6
Alkalinity (mg/i) 23 31 33 36
Total P (mg/i) 0.053 0.055 0.055 0.058
Dissolved P (mg/i) 0.027 0.032 0.033 0.037
NO + NO (mg/i) 0.320 0.363 0.375 0.390
Am onia mg/1) 0.090 0.097 0.095 0.110
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches)
22 32
33 36
-------
7
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Number
Date Genera per ml
06/24/72 1. Melosira 12,441
2. Anabaena 1,953
3. Stephanodiscus 922
4. Cyclotella 434
5. Fragilaria 380
Other genera 904
Total 17,034
08/20/72 1. Cyclotella 1,628
2. Melosira 1,374
3. Anabaena 778
4. Synedra 561
5. Gloeocapsa 398
Other genera 1 ,048
Total 5,787
11/10/72 1. Flagellates 1,220
2. Melosira 587
3. Cyclotella 346
4. Synedra 256
5. Anabaena 181
Other genera 979
Total 3,569
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a —
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/i )
06/24/72 01 147.3
02 143.6
03 116.3
01 4.0
02 10.5
03 22.9
01 6.2
02 6.6
03 4.9
Maximum yield
___________ ___________ ___________ ( mg/i-dry wt. )
12.0
11.2
11.3
11.4
14.0
48.3
19.6
08/20/72
11/10/72
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N
Spike (mg/l) Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i ) _____________
Control 0.048 0.490
0.006 p 0.054 0.490
0.012 P 0.060 0.490
0.024 p 0.072 0.490
0.060 P 0.108 0.490
0.060 P + 10.0 N 0.108 10.490
10.0 N 0.048 10.490
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri—
cornutum , indicates the potential primary productivity of
the lake was high at the time the sample was collected. Also,
the lack of yield response to increased levels of orthophos-
phorus, until nitrogen was also added, indicates the sample was
-------
9
nitrogen limited. However, while there was a 3% increase
in inorganic nitrogen in the sample upon autoclaving, there
was a 17% increase in orthophosphorus which resulted in a
shift from the lake N/P ratio of 14/1 (phosphorus limited)
to the sample N/P ratio of 10/1 (nitrogen limited).
The lake data, then, indicate phosphorus limitation in
November but nitrogen limitation in June (N/P = 3/1) and in
August (N/P = 9/1).
D. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Lake Wisconsin is eutrophic. Of the
46 Wisconsin lakes studied, 25 had less mean total phosphorus,
24 had less mean dissolved phosphorus, and 26 had less mean inor-
ganic nitrogen. Only four of the study lakes had higher mean
chlorophyll a, and 32 had greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
-------
10
V. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Wisconsin National
Guard collected a monthly near-surface grab sample from each of the tribu-
tary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the high runoff
months of April and May when two samples were collected. Sampling was
begun in September, 1972, and was completed in August, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by the Madi-
son District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary sites
nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were calculated
using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows. Nutrient loadings
for “minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were
estimated by using the means of the nutrient loads, in lbs/mi 2 /year, in
Rowan and Spring creeks at stations D—l and E-l and multiplying the means
by the ZZ area in mi 2 .
The operator of the Baraboo wastewater treatment plant provided monthly
effluent samples and corresponding flow data. However, the cities of Lodi
and Wisconsin Dells, the villages of Lake Delton and Poynette, and the
Badger Army Ammunition Works (sewage) did not participate in the Survey,
and nutrient loads were estimated at 2.5 lbs P and 7.5 lbs N/capita/year
(the City of Portage discharges to the Fox River).
-------
11
Pop.
Name Served*
Baraboo 7,931
Lake 1 ,059
Del ton
Lodi 1 ,831
Poynette 1,118
Wisconsin 2,401
Dell s
Badger 2,000
Army Ammo.
Wks (sanitary
wastes)
1970 Census; Badger Army Ammo.
(100 gal/capita/day).
** Schraufnagel, 1974.
t McKersie, et al., 1972.
The process wastes of the Badger A.A.W. were not sampled directly;
however, samples were collected from the ditch receiving the process
wastes at station F-i. The mean total nitrogen concentration of these
samples and the process flow reported by McKersie, et al. (1972), were
used to calculate the nitrogen contribution of this source. The value
shown in the nitrogen loading table is that calculated minus the esti-
mated sewage nitrogen load. The phosphorus load in the process wastes
is assumed to be negligible.
In the following loading tables, the loads given for the tributaries
are those measured minus the point-source loads, if any.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Treatment
Trickling
filter
Prim.
clarifier
Trickling
filter
Trickling
filter
Prim.
clarifier
Trickling
filter
Mean
Flow (mgd )
1 .820
Q 3QQ**
0.285±
0.080±
0.500**
0.200±
Receiving
Water
Baraboo River
Wisconsin River
Spring Creek
Rowan Creek
Wisconsin River
Wisconsin River
Wks. “pop. served” estimated from flow
-------
12
2. Known lndustrial* -
Mean Receiving
Name Product Treatment Flow (mgd) Water
Badger Amrnuni- Neutrali- 25.000 Wisconsin River
Army tion zation
Ammo. Wks. + lagoon
(process
wastes)
* McKersie, et al., 1972.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading — Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbsP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Wisconsin River (A-2) 1,005,640 83.3
Baraboo River 133,850 11.1
Rowan Creek 5,740 0.5
Spring Creek 5,400 0.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 10,140 0.8
c. Known municipal -
Baraboo 24,440 2.0
Lake Delton . 2,650 0.2
Lodi 4,580 0.4
Poynette 2,800 0.2
Wisconsin Dells 6,000 0.5
Badger AAW 5,000 0.4
d. Septic tanks* - 420 <0.1
e. Industrial —
Badger AAW nil -
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,390 0.1
Total 1,207,780 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Wisconsin River 1,146,010
3. Net annual P accumulation — 61,770 pounds.
* Based on 672 lakeshore dwellings (1959 U.S.G.S. quad. maps); see
Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
lbsN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Wisconsin River 17,640,160 81.2
Baraboo River 1,424,330 6.6
Rowan Creek 128,730 0.6
Spring Creek 156,640 0.7
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) - 379,350 1.7
c. Known municipal -
Baraboo 90,920 0.4
Lake Delton 7,940 <0.1
Lodi 13,730 0.1
Poynette 8,380 <0.1
Wisconsin Dells 18,010 0.1
Badger AWW 15,000 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 15,790 0.1
e. Known industrial —
Badger AAW 1,743,790 8.0
f. Direct precipitation** - 85,740 0.4
Total 21,728,510 100.0
2. Outputs —
Lake outlet - Wisconsin River 21,279,010
3. Net annual N accumulation - 449,500 pounds
* Based on 672 lakeshore dwellings (1959 U.S.G.S. quad. maps); see
Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary lbs P/m1 2 /yr lbs N/m1 2 /yr
Wisconsin River (A-2) 124 2,170
Baraboo River 223 2,374
Rowan Creek 121 2,842
Spring Creek 118 3,435
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his “dangerous” rate is the rate at which the
receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his “permissible” rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphonietry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would be consid-
ered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
lbs/acr /yr 135.7 6.9 2,441.4 50.5
grams/rn /yr 15.21 0.78 273.6 5.7
Vol1e weider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Wisconsin:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 2.50
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 1.25
-------
16
VI. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1972. Wisconsin lakes. Pubi. 218-72. Dept. of Natural
Resources, Madison.
Ball, Joseph R., 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
__________ Tom Smith, and C. W. Threinen, 1971. Surface water
resources of Sauk County. Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Lueschow, Lloyd A., 1972. Biology and control of selected aquatic
nuisances in recreational waters. Tech. Bull. No. 57. Dept. of
Natural Resources, Madison.
Martin, R. 0. R., and Ronald L. Hanson,1966. Reservoirs in the United
States. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1838. Wash-
ington, D.C.
McKersje, Jerome R., Robert M. Krill, Floyd F. Stautz, Charles Kozel,
and Richard P. Narf; 1972. Lower Wisconsin River pollution
investigation survey. Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Schraufnagel, Francis H., 1974. Personal communication (Lake Delton
and Wisconsin Dells waste treatment facilities). Dept. of Natural
Resources, liadi son.
Schraufnagel, F. H., L. A. Montie, Jerome R. McKersie, Gary W. Karl,
and Charles Kozel; 1966. Report on an investigation of the pollu-
tion in the Lower Wisconsin River drainage basin made during 1965.
Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison.
Vollenweider, Richard A., (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
A. Hydrol.
-------
17
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN
9/30/74
LAKE CODE 5555
LAKE WISCONSIN
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE 8950.00
SUB—DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JAN PEA MAP APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
9 72 11000.00
10 72 17000.00
11 72 13000.00
12 72 8800.00
I 73 11400.00
2 73 8800.00
3 73 27500.00
4 73 25000.00
5 73 28000.00
6 73 14300.00
7 73 5800.00
8 73 5500.00
9 72 10000.00
10 72 16000.00
11 72 13000.00
12 72 8600.00
73 11200.00
2 73 8500.00
3 73 27000.00
4 73 24500.00
S 73 27500.00
6 73 14000.00
7 73 5700.00
8 73 5400.00
23 10000.00
15 11000.00
9 8400.00
10 9500.00
11 24500.00
14 15500.00
12 34000.00
11 12300.00
15 5600.00
19 5000.00
24 6600.00
14 11000.00
10 8200.00
10 9100.00
II 39000.00
20 52000.00
3 37000.00
23 9800.00
18 6200.00
19 4800.00
TOTAL FLOW IN = 87774.00
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 87762.12
555561
5S55A3
SSSSE I
s555ZZ
8950.00
8730.00
45.60
174.00
4685.9
4700.0
20.00
66.00
4978.6 8981.3 14643.0
5000.0 8900.0 14000.0
20.00 46.00 46.00
66.00 200.00 200.00
9078.9
9100.0
74.00
73.00
6247.9
6200.0
21.00
65.00
10738.0
10000.0
34.00
130.00
8950.00
8949.60
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS =
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
4685.9
4700.0
20.00
58.00
6247.9
6200.0
28.00
89.00
5857.4
S800.0
26.00
90.00
MEAN FLOW DAY
6345.5
6400.0
26.00
90.00
5271.7
5200.0
20.00
66.00
7313.3
7182.2
31.72
99.54
SS5SAI
555563
FLOW DAY
SUMMARY
FLOW DAY FLOW
17000.00
15500.00
15400.00
29
25
25
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR WISCONSIN
9/30/74
LAKE CODE 5555
LAKE WISCONSIN
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW
TRIBUTARY
5555E1
5555zz
DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
FLOW
9
72
50.00
23
28.00
10
72
70.00
15
33.00
11
72
42.00
12
72
25.00
10
21.00
1
73
44.00
2
73
36.00
10
30.00
3
73
86.00
11
160.00
4
73
88.00
14
66.00
5
73
120.00
12
72.00
6
73
48.00
11
46.00
7
73
32.00
15
32.00
8
73
35.00
19
30.00
9
72
210.00
23
150.00
10
72
250.00
15
110.00
11
72
150.00
12
72
87.00
9
74.00
1
73
190.00
2
73
140.00
10
110.00
3
73
370.00
11
700.00
4
73
380.00
14
280.00
5
73
420.00
12
270.00
6
73
150.00
11
140.00
7
73
94.00
15
94.00
8
73
100.00
19
88.00
29
25
29
25
78.00
98.00
330.00
370.00
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555501
43 22 06.0 089 37 18.0
WISCONSIN LAKE
55 WISCONSIN
1 IEPALES
3
2111202
0011 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
32217
CHLRPP4YL
A
UG/L
00300 00077
DO TRANSP
SECCHI
MG/L INCHES
00094
CNDUCTVY
F I ELD
MICROMHO
00630
N02&N03
N—TOTAL
MG/I
00610
NH3—N
TOTAL
MG/L
72/06/24
72/08/ 20
72/11/10
09 20 0000
11 35 0000
11 10 0000
147. 3J
4.OJ
6.2J
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
72/06/24 09 20 0000
- 09 20 0010
77/08/20 11 35 0000
11 35 0004
11 35 0015
11 35 0021
72/11/10 11 10 0000
11 10 0004
11 10 0014
20.0
20 • 0
27.2
24 • 8
23.6
5.8
5.8
9.7
9.1
8.4
4.4
2.0
10.7
10.6
32
30
36
00400 00410
PH TALK
CACO3
SU MG/L
8.11
8.00
8.80
8.05
7.25
7.00
7.60
7.60
7.60
142
142
180
180
188
190
150
150
150
00665 00666
PHOS—TOT PHOS-DIS
MG/I P MG/L P
50 0.050
52 0.050
55 0.080
55 0.120
57 0.260
60 0.170
33 0.390
34 0.380
32 0.390
0.0 30
0.060
0.050
0.0 80
0.270
0.610
0.100
0.090
0.090
0.062
0.120
0.051
0.050
0.066
0.146
0.056
0.058
0.055
0.039
0.037
0.031
0.028
0.0 36
0.0 77
0.036
0.034
0.0 32
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555502
43 23 18.0 089 33 36.0
WISCONSIN LAKE
55 WISCONSIN
1 1EPALES
3
2111202
0007 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
7?/06/24
7?/08/20
7?/1 1/10
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 40 0000
12 00 0000
10 50 0000
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
143.6J
10.5J
6.6J
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00630
00610
00665
00666
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDIJCTVY
PH
T ALK
W02&N03
NH3—N
PHOS—TOT
PHOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
M G/I.
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
MG/L
MG/I.
MG/ I .
MG/L P
MG/L P
72/06/24
09 40 0000
19.5
9.1
22
130
7.3R
45
0.080
0.060
0.150
0.041
72/08/20
12 00 0000
33
170
7.50
49
0.300
0.080
0.058
0.041
12 00 0004
26.3
7.0
168
7.50
49
0.280
0.090
O.058
0.038
12 00 0009
26.1
7.5
170
7.50
48
0.300
0.080
0.061
0.040
72/11/10
10 50 0000
36
140
7.40
23
0.320
0.090
0.053
0.028
10 50 0006
5.8
9.9
140
7.50
29
6.330
0.110
0.053
0.027
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/30
555503
43 25 12.0 089 31 48.0
WISCONSIN LAKE
55 WISCONSIN
11EPALES 2111202
3 0007 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00630 00610 00665 00666
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK N02&N03 NH3—N PHOS—TOT PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEHP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 N—TOTAL TOTAL
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU HG/L MG/L MG/I PIG/I P MG/L P
72/06/24 09 50 0000 19.8 10.4 33 115 7.78 40 0.040 0.030 0.096 0.031
72/08/20 15 20 0000 28 173 7.60 50 0.240 0.070 0.079 0.051
15 20 0004 26.3 11.2 162 7.80 52 0.240 0.060 0.081 0.037
72/11/10 10 35 0000 7.0 10.9 36 155 7.50 36 0.370 0.100 0.058 0.037
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLPPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/06/24 09 50 0000 116.3J
72/08/20 15 20 0000 22.9J
72/11/10 10 35 0000 4.9J
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOPET ETPIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5555A1 1S5555A1
43 18 30.0 089 43 30.0
w sc sj’
55039 15 APAB00
0/LAKE WISCONSIN
DAM 1 MI N OF PRAIRIE DU SAC
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 006)0 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO AY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/21 16 15 0.650 1.000 0.142 0.04? 0.111
7?/I0/15 13 30 0.680 0.950 0.115 0.032 0.O 4
72/H/li 15 25 0.510 1.150 0.058 0.029 0.070
73/01/06 15 25 0.560 0.840 0.099 0.034 0.070
73/02/10 15 20 0.620 1.050 0.180 0.050
73/03/11 13 40 0.720 1.??0 0.210 0.039 0.130
71/04/14 13 40 0.440 0.800 0.066 0.013 0.060
71/04/?9 10 15 ‘0.320 0.820 0.018 0.017 0.065
73/05/12 09 25 0.730 1.050 0.040 0.027 0.075
71/05/25 11 10 0.190 0.960 0.050 0.017 0.065
71/06/11 1? 10 0.260 1.320 0.07P 0.018 0.070
73/07/15 09 15 0.350 1.030 0.1 0 0.022 0.075
71/08/19 13 00 0.357 0.640 0.108 0.035 0.080
-------
STOPET ETPTEVAL DATE 74/10/02
55 55A2 LS 5555A?
43 32 30.0 0 9 28 10.0
WISCONSIN PIVtTP
5 5 15 O TAGE
T/LAKE WISCONSIN
ST HwY 33 BRDG S EDGE PORTAGE ABOVE STP
1 IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIWE DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS P lOS TOT
FROH OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL OQTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L ‘A(,/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
7?/09/?4 08 45 0.646 1.150 0.120 O.03R 0.105
7?/10/1 4 08 30 0.310 0.900 0.OBO 0.028
7?/11/11 08 15 0.280 1. O0 0.0S2 0.027 0.065
7?/1?/10 08 40 0.336 0.970 0.073 0.026
71/01/14 08 45 0.370 0.9R0 0.071 0.018 0.055
71/0?/11 10 45 Q•47Q 1.100 0.088 0.026 0.055
71/04/07 09 00 0.340 1.670 0.154 0.019 0.060
73/04/20 10 00 0.280 0.720 0.072 0.016 0.055
71/05/03 17 15 0.200 0.750 0.032 0.023 0.065
71/05/25 10 40 0.147 0.870 0.016 0.018 0.065
73/06/24 0.280 0.960 0.320 0.038 0.090
71/07/18 0.126 1.150 0.029 0.019 0.095
71/08/19 0.138 0.830 0.020 0.024 0.100
-------
STOPET RETP!EVAL DATE 74/10/02
5555A3 LS5555A3
43 28 00.0 089 28 00.0
WISCONSIN RIVEf
55 15 POYNETTE
1/LAKE WISCONSIN
FROM MAGENS HGTS RESOPT DOCK IN DEKORA
1 1EPALES 211120’.
4 0000 FEET OEPTH
00630 006?5 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTP-i NO2F NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FPOM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OQTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L ‘i(/L MG/I MG/I P MG/L P
7?/0 /?4 10 45 0.195 0.900 0.184 0.022 0.100
7?/10/14 09 50 0.400 0.850 0.120 0.025 0.083
7?/1I/1.1 09 45 0.115 0.970 0.032 0.024 0.060
73/03/14 07 ‘ +5 0.440 1.400 0.147 0.027 0.120
71/04/20 10 55 0.290 1.600 0.147 0.016 0.050
71/05/03 19 00 0.200 0.840 0.035 0.024 0.080
73/05/25 11 45 0.140 0.900 0.020 0.022 0.067
73/06/23 0.273 0. 20 0.060 0.044 O.0 5
71/07/18 0.126 0.960 0.O1F 0.018 0.080
7 1/08/1 0.130 0.940 0.029 0.025 0.095
-------
STOREr RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
55 55B1 L 5 5555R1
43 27 30.0 0 9 44 00.0
ARABOO RIVER
55 15 BARABOO
T/LAr(E WISCONSIN
CITY PDG SE CORNER OF BARABO()
HF ’ALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
AROV STP
DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS-lOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
(JRTHO
TO
DAY
FFET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/U
I IG/L P
MG/L P
7?/0 /?3
14 00
0.309
1.250
O.?50
0.070
0.270
72/10/15
11 45
0.830
0.450
0.085
0.080
0.170
72/11/li
17 20
0.830
0.460
0.03°
0.077
0.147
73/01/14
17 35
1.320
i .iqo
0.340
0.1OS
0.195
71/0?/10
15
15
1.120
1.680
O.?’ 0
0.096
0.200
71/03/11
14 31
0.920
?.100
0.340
0.079
0.1?
71/04/14
15 00
0.760
?e l O O
0.080
0.064
0.210
71/04/?
ii 75
0.750
0.880
0.056
0.060
0.190
71/05/12
11 ?5
0.550
0.910
0.034
0.076
0.?20
73/05/25
1? 35
0.540
0.960
0.033
0.07R
0.1t 0
71/0 6/lI
15 5
0.820
1.400
0.096
0.090
0.190
71/07/15
11 0
0.6?0
1.300
0.038
0.i?0
0.375
73/O /I9
14 40
0.600
0.660
0.038
0.115
0.210
-------
ST 3PET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
5555’3? LS5555R?
43 27 30.0 0 9 43 00.0
BA AB0O R1VtEI
55 15 BA ABOO
T/1AI E WISCO ’1SIN
ST p-$vJY 113 HRDG ESE OF BA ABOO BELO STP
11E ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO? NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FQO OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TD DAY FEET MG/L MC’/L M( /L M( /L P MG/L P
72/09/21 14 15 0.245 1.550 0.290 0.053 0.310
72/10/15 11 50 0.897 0.i,00 0.112 0.100 0.190
7 2/11/11 17 10 0.A 0 0.690 0.088 0.126 0 200
72/12/09 16 15 1.120 0.720 0.120 0.105 0.220
73/01/14 1.400 1.890 0.440 0.118 0.250
71/02/10 )7 12 1.180 1.320 0.340 0.147 0.300
71/03/11 14 20 0.910 2.100 0.370 0.083 0.125
73/04/14 14 50 0.750 0.870 0.056 0.084 0.250
71/04/29 I I 20 0.750 0.980 0.080 0.069 0.225
73/05/12 11 20 0.580 0.960 0.046 0.080 0.230
73/05/25 12 50 0.580 0.930 0.042 0.087 0.dO O
73/06/11 13 50 0.890 1.260 0.120 0.120 0.240
71/07/15 11 45 0.680 1.760 0.450 O.19 0.375
71/08/1 ) 14 10 0.680 0.760 0.082 0.160 0.330
-------
STOPET ETP!EVAL DATE 74/10/02
5555B3 LS555583
43 30 00.0 089 28 30.0
BA ABOO 1 EP
55 15 POi TaGE
T/LAI E WISCONSIN
Co HWY U BRDG S OF PORTAGE
1IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATF TIME DEPTH NO?€.N03 TOT KJFL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FPOM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MC,/L P MG/L P
72/09/24 09 10 0.3O 1.700 0.250 0.093 0.310
7?/10/14 0 45 1.000 0.600 0.110 0.086 0.190
7?/11/11 OH 30 0.960 O.8 0 0.050 O. OSR 0.170
72/12/10 09 00 1.160 1.470 0.096 0.066 0.250
71/01/14 09 00 1.3?O 0.840 0.200 0.089 0.140
73/92/11 10 30 1.200 1. OO 0.320 0.09? 0.165
73/03/1’ 07 30 0.980 1.500 0.315 0.08? 0.300
71/04/07 09 10 0.950 0.960 0.039 0.071 0.195
73/04/20 tO 15 0.870 2.050 0.154 0.054 0.210
71/05/12 17 30 0.580 1.050 0.075 0.100 0. 4O
73/05/17 10 0 0.620 1.020 0.030 0.083 0.220
73/06/?4 1.020 ?.400 0.092 0.096 0.230
71/07/18 0.810 0.750 0.035 0.130 O.d60
71/08/19 0.970 0.560 0.025 0.130 0.264
-------
STOPET ETP1EVAL DATE 74/10/0?
5 555C1 L55555C1
43 30 30.0 089 25 00.0
IMJCI< CREEK
55 15 PORTAGE
T/LAKE WISCONSIN
US 116 BROG SE OF PORTAGE
I1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02 N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PriOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM or N-TOTAL TOTAL 0PTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
72/09/24 11 20 0.238 1.8 50 0.400 0.023 0.115
72/10/14 10 15 0.970 1.100 0.138 0.05? 0.095
7?/11/11 10 15 0.960 0.770 0.012 0.026 0.046
72/ 12/lU 7.400 1.100 0.088 0.032 0.064
71/01/14 10 30 2.700 2.100 0.180 0.037 0.095
71/02/11 09 20 1.860 1.050 0.132 0.050 0.090
73/03/14 05 45 1.300 1.700 0.480 0.075
71/04/07 11 00 0.680 1.3’O 0.028 0.019 0.055
71/04/20 11 30 0.270 1.100 0.034 0.012 0.050
71/05/03 0.180 0.720 0.017 0.020 0.060
71/05/17 1? 00 0.230 1.050 0.019 0.030 0.065
71/06/24 0.500 1.260 0.399 0.105 0.185
71/07/1 0.670 0.960 0.048 0.056 0.115
73/0’3/19 08 45 0.830 0.750 0.042 0.063 0.105
-------
STORET RETPIEVAL DATE 74/10/02
555501
43 24
Ow ts N
T IL A P S E
Co HWY
11 EPALES
4
LS555501
30.0 089 28 00.0
CREEK
15 POYNETTE
WISCONSIN
J 3RDG WNW OF POYNETTE
2111204
0000 FEET
RELO STP
DEPTH
DATE
r p 0’4
TO
7?/O’ /24
72/10/1’
72/1 1/11
7?/ 12/10
71/0 1/14
71/02/11
71/03/14
71/04/07
71/04/20
71/05/03
71/05/ 17
71/06/24
71/07/L i
73/08/19
TIME DFPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 05
09 25
09 70
11 00
10 00
10 00
07 00
09 30
10 45
18 00
11 15
00630
00625
00 ’10
00671
00665
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PrIOSDIS
PHOS—TOT
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
OPTHO
MG/L
AG/L
‘iG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
0.1?0
O. 50
0.345
0.023
0.140
0.975
0.300
0.067
0.073
0.120
1.600
0.330
0.042
0.070
0.097
?.100
0.460
0.130
0.080
0.120
2.060
0.140
0.133
0.083
0.125
2.100
0.3S0
0.13?
0.088
0.125
1.?20
0.780
0.138
0.079
0.198
1.300
0.960
0.058
0.05?
0.080
1.?40
2.900
0.130
0.054
0.080
0.640
1.100
0.080
0.105
0.260
1.400
0.580
0.040
0.058
0.095
1.600
2.300
0.126
0.082
0.150
1.620
0.480
0.070
0.105
0.175
1.470
0.230
0.033
0.068
0.095
-------
STORET PETRIEVAL DATE 14/10/0?
5555 1)2 L 55555D2
43 23 30,0 089 2’. 07.0
OwAN C’ EEK
iS P( )Y TT
1/LAKE WISCONSIN
CO HWY S RRDG IN POYNETIE AHOy SIP
1 IFPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TI E DEDTH NO7F NO3 TOT KJEL Nt-1)—N P’-iOS—DlS P1-405—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORT -I0
TO DAY FEET MG/L hlG/L Mfl/L MG/L P HG/L P
72/09/24 09 45 0.357 0.200 0.031 0.043
7?/1 )/14 09 10 1.600 0.200 0.035 0.021
72/H/lI 09 00 ‘.?OO 0.290 0.018 0.0?5 0.033
7?/12/10 1030 ?.400 0.100K 0.021 0.015 0.022
71/01/1” 10 70 7,4QØ 0.100K 0.020 0.02) 0.025
71/02/11 .400 0.100K 0.u31 0.028 0.040
71/03/14 06 30 1.500 0.069 0.062
73/04/07 tO .0 ?.100 0,130 fl.00 0.015 0.025
73/04/20 11 05 2.000 0.660 0.027 0.024 0.055
73/05/0j 17 20 2.100 0.690 0.089 0.075 0.145
71/05/17 11 30 2.200 0.230 0.009 0.015 0.025
73/ 6/?4 2.040 0.870 0.050 0.027 0.045
73/07/ 1P l.a?0 0.145 0.018 0.018 0.035
71/0M/ IQ 1.970 0.100K 0.014 0.035 0.035
K V. LUF KNOWN TO [ LEcS
T1-ii N I DTC TF -
-------
STDRET ETR!FVAL DATE 74/10/02
55 55E1 L 5555E)
43 ?0 30.0 089 33 30.0
S IN6 CREEK
15 A A8OO
T/LAKE WISCONSIN
ST HwY 113 DG £ J ç
1 1EPALES
4
OF LODI r3ELO STP
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
00610
00625
00610
00671
00665
1) T [
TIME
DEPTH
N026N03
TOT KJFL
NH3—N
P -iOS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FP3 1
(W
‘J—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
OPT -1O
TO
PAY
FEET
MG/L
1G/L
G/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
7?/c’Q/ ?3
15
?5
O.3 ’?
0.950
0.555
0.115
0.153
72/10/15
1?
55
1.580
0.505
0.080
0.073
0.105
7?/1If11
16
00
1.820
0.480
0.160
0.13?
0.160
72/12/09
15
00
1.960
0.500
0.140
0.084
0.138
73/01/06
14
40
?.040
0.760
0.150
0.093
0.165
73/0?/10
14
15
.O0u
0.560
0.123
0.085
71/03/11
13
05
1.420
1.’00
0.?9?
0.153
0.360
71/04/14
14
15
1.080
1.800
0.081
0.OQ1
0.240
71/06/?
10
50
1.640
0.500
0.092
0.088
0.135
71/OS/I?
10
00
1.760
0.400
0.054
0.071
0.110
73/05/2-
11
45
1.190
1.200
0.07 5
0.155
71/06/11
13
15
1.7?0
0.770
0.06
0.078
0.115
71/07/15
10
15
1.760
4.100
0.07?
0.0 6
0.1?5
71/OS/LQ
13
35
1.740
0.220
0.048
0.078
0.1?0
-------
ST )RET ETPIEVAL DATF 74/10/02
5555E7 L 55555E2
43 19 00.0 089 31 30.0
S ’PINC’ CPEEP<
55 15 riA AROO
T/IAKE WISCONSIN
St HWY 60 H DG IN LOUt ABOVSTP
I IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00 5 00610 00671 00 65
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL N-13--N P-iOS—DIc PHOS—TOt
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL
TO )AY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MI./L p M /L P
7?/0z?/23 15 35 0.310 0.510
7?/ 10/l5 1? 05 1.640 0.360 O.09P 0.02 0.05’)
72/11/1! 15 50 1.660 0.440 0.034 0.031 0.060
7?/12/0 14 55 2.040 0.740 0.050 0.0? 0.063
71/01/06 14 00 2.000 0.400 0.050 0.026 0.055
71/02/10 14 01 2.000 0.4 O (1.046 0.034
71/03/11 1? 40 1.2 40 3.900 0.520 0.282 0.700
71/04/14 14 05 1.080 1.153 0.039 0.066 0.180
71/04/? 10 40 1.660 0.190 0.046 0.037 0.0’40
73/05/1? 09 50 1.800 0.360 ( 1.048 0.031 0.065
71/05/25 11 35 1.060 1.000 0.08 0.05? 0.110
71/06/11 13 05 1.740 7.300 0.073 0.042 0.075
73/07/15 09 40 1.6 0 0.420 0.049 0.039 0.075
71/Oh/19 11 ‘5 1.600 0. 80 0.060 0.037 0.060
-------
STOQET PETPIEVAL ,)ATE 74/10/U?
. 5ct,F I LSS55SF I
41 20 00.0 0M9 31 30.0
U ’JNAMEf) C LEK
55 15 bAPABOO
T/LAl E WISCONSIN
ST HWY 78 R OG BEL() A1)GER
I 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00633 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIMF DEPTH NO?M403 TOT KJEL NH3—r J PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOt
FRO 1 OF u—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTi-iO
TO DAY FEET MC ’/L AC,/L IC’/L MG/L P MG/L
7?/0 / 3 15 10 0.6’7 j .R50 0.163 0.03R 0.07H
72/10/15 13 40 69.000 ‘).3’ 5 0.022 0.060
7?/I1/11 15 15 9.300 0.310 0.00 5K 0.037
7?/I?/09 14 5 64.00) 0.30? 0.007 0.054
71/01/06 15 25 5R.Sfl0 o.cso 0.330 O.Ol 0.045
71/0?/I0 15 35 64.000 0.?90 0.013
71/03/11 13 50 42.000 0.370 0.020 0.040
71/04/14 13 30 55.000 0.230 0.O0’K 0.067
71/04/? 10 05 5 .0O0 0.336 0.005K 0.040
73/05/1’ 0 15 1.800 0.310 0.01? 0.0 5
71/05/25 11 00 54.00 0 . ”30 0.OOM 0.060
71/u6/11 17 05 41.200 1.?60 0.610 0.012 0.0 5
73/07/1 0 05 3.200 1.800 0.2 .0 0.007 0.UP O
71/0 /19 1? 50 4.400 2.100 0.550 0.014 0.0 5
K VALIJ - ( j IqN TO ‘- L S
JHftr } I jDICATE )
-------
ST0P T T I VAL 0A1 74/09/30
555550 TF555550
P007931
43 27 30.0 089 43 30.0
CITY OF BARABOO
55 15 BARABOO
T/LA$ E WISCONSIN
ARA8O0 RIVER
IIEPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET
D€PTH
3i
J3675
00610
00671
00665 50051 50053
1)ftTF
T1
0C ’Tp-’
iO N03
TOT YcJFL
N-li—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FPO
()I
I’1-1OT L
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE FLOW—M6O
TO
I Y
F T
/L
‘IG/L
MG/L
MG/I P
MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
71/01/0
04 00
CP(T)—
. 0’)
11.000
0.060
4.160
5.100 1.250 1.560
73/01/03
15 ‘ )
73/0?/01
O 00
C (T)—
f -.0 3
11.500
1.160
3.700
4.700 1.500 1.800
73/0?/04
1 00
71/03/01
04 00
CP(fl—
‘ ..0 C
9.100
1.130
3.600
4.400 1.700 1.600
73/03/01
15 00
73/04/04
u 0’)
CP(T)—
3.700
10.000
).330
2.600
3.425 2.200 2.300
71/04/0
15 00
.
73 / 0 C,/ 0 i
09 00
CP(T)—
‘..4jO
9.400
0.042
2.050
2.800 2.800 2.400
73/05/01
tc
71/’)F /0I
04
CP(T)—
1.010
4.000
0.021
3.120
4.000 2.700 2.710
73/06/0 1
l IjQ
71/07/0
) 0’)
C U)—
lI.0 ’ o
5.3 0u
0.094
3.430
4.500 1.100 2.400
71/O7/0
lb ‘ 0
71/o4/1 -
0 )I)
rP(T)—
. 7o0
5. 00
u.?00
2.000
4.600 1.400 1. 0
iiin iis
15 ‘ r
71/09/0
04 00
CP( T )—
7.
7.9 5
4.140
1.500 1.600
71/ ’ O/O
1,
7 1/ )0/01
( ‘ ‘4 )0
(‘D(T)—
lI.?lu
IS.50•1
4.600
4. 900
6.500 1.900 1.400
71/l ./f)
IS fl
71/11/ ’ ) ’
,P (j’)
CP(T)—
1 3.7u ,
7.500
0.130
3.900
4.600 1.400 1.800
73/1I/0
IS ‘ f
71/17/35
14 00
C U)—
- .h) 0
9.Q00
0.09)
3.700
4.600 1.500 1.400
73/ 7/’)
15 Ofl
-------
5555’,p r ssssso
43 7 3v. ) ) 9 43 30.’)
CITY )F r1A ?A O()
N iA’?A D0
T/LAKR JISCONSIN
A AE ’O’) - ‘ 1v’-
1 1EP ’L S
4
7L /’)I/0. . r,
CP ( T) -
7L /çJ/r I 1L5 • r’
1.1CO 1.300
STOQFT :r 1 E V L )4T ? . / /)U
r) TI
T )
.‘
T ‘ - )E -’T-1 i 2 Ifl
oI
)AY FF’ T
C e ::
rt)r KJ L
1C,/L
I r.ir ’o
00 7931
214 1204
0000 FtET flEi Tt1
‘4 •
•J ‘)6 10
N-I I — N
rot AL
0/ L
3. S 2 U
01)671
P 1-lOS—f) IS
OPT ‘- 10
MG/L P
1.600
00665 5)0 1
PHO ,—TQT
L T .
MG/L P 1f ’ST Mu:)
5.000
SOi) 53
CUNI)U 1 T
FL J i( )
MONTHLY
------- |