330/1—84—003 MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITV RANKING OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES REGION VIII \ September 1984 J 1 II — I : b ------- UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING 330/1—84—003 MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES REGION VIII September 1984 Eugene Lubieniecki , Jr. NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER Denver, Colorado ------- CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . 1 METHODS . . . . . 3 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA) 3 SITE CONTAMINATION (CERCLA) 6 wAS1E ATER DISCHARGE (CWA) 7 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL/PESTICIDE STORAGE AND USE (TSCA/FIFRA) 8 AIR EMISSIONS (CAA) 8 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 TABLES 1 Facility Rating Criteria S 2 Facility Ratings (by ranking) 11 3 Facility Ratings (by location) 14 ------- MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES - REGION VIII INTRODUCTION A multi-media priority ranking system was developed to evaluate selected Region VIII Federal facilities according to their relative poten- tial for having environmental problems. The system was developed to use readily available information in a rapid and objective manner to identify “high priority” facilities for further detailed evaluation by EPA. The ranking system was not designed to compare a facility rating with any fixed number to indicate whether a facility is environmentally “good” or “bad”. Rather, the rating indicates a facility’s potential, relative to other installations, for having major environmental problems (i.e., a high rating indicates that a facility has a relatively high potential for environmental problems), and that further evaluation, if not already completed, is warranted. Rating criteria were developed and used to rate facilities according to the type and intensity of facility activities which could actually or potentially result in environmental contamination. In general, these activ- ities include past and present hazardous waste** generation and management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, and handling and storage of hazardous material. For purposes of this ranking system and in keeping with EPA Region VIII and ieadquarters priorities, potential environmental problems from hazardous waste management activity were rated higher than potential problems from other activities. To ensure timely but meaningful comparisons between installations, the information used to rank the facilities was con- fined to that which was easily accessible and available for all or most of the installations. Thus, much of the facility information used came from * Environmental problems as used h•re, are directly related to the release of contaminants to the environment. ** As defined in 40 CER 261 ------- 2 various EPA coaput.r databases. This information was supplemented as necessary with Region V III file data. More specific information, such as detailed site inspection reports, was not used here because such information is available for only a few facilities.* This report describes the rating criteria and information sources, and it details how they were used to rank the selected facilities. * Specific facility information would be used as part of the detailed followup evaluation of a facility, if warranted. ------- 3 METHODS An initial listing of Federal facilities in Region VIII was obtained from EPA’s computerized Facilities Index System (FINDS). This list con- tains approximately 175 Federal installations with known or suspected haz- ardous waste disposal sites (active and inactive), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit applications on file with EPA, National Pol- lutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits and/or air emission point sources. Of these, approximately 50 were selected by Region VIII for prioritizatiofl by NEIC. These selected facilities were ranked based on the type and relative level of activity in the following five categories: Hazardous waste management • Site contamination (known and potential) Wastewater discharge Polychiorinated biphenols (PCBs)/pest’icides storage and use • Air emissions These five categories generally reflect pertinent activities regulated under one or more of the six environmental acts: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)/Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Clean Air Act (CM), respectively. The five rating categories and an ex- planation of the information used to rank facilities in each category follows. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA ) This category ranks facilities according to the potential for environ- mental contamination through generation and handling of hazardous waste. For rating purposes, the category was divided into four activity subcate- gories: (1) annual quantity of hazardous waste generated, (2) waste storage ------- 4 design capacIty, (3) waste treat nent design capacity and (4) waste disposal design capacity. These general subcategories were used because of the type of information readily available and the wide range of possible activities and levels of activities related to hazardous waste management. The major source of information used was the EPA Hazardous Waste Data Management System (HWDMS), a computer database which contains information submitted to EPA by hazardous waste generation/handling facilities as part of their Part A RCRA permit application. The data include type of hazard- ous waste handling activity, design capacity of waste processes and type and quantity of waste generated and subsequently handled. Because the com- puter database was incomplete (all information was not available for all hazardous waste facilities), some of this information was obtained from EPA- Region VIII RCRA files. The minimum rating for any facility generating hazardous waste is 3. This accounts for activities involving actual generating and any short term or small quantity handling of waste by the facility. Generating facilities with RCRA storage, treatment or disposal activities were rated according to the relative level of activity in each subcategory as shown in Table 1. An additional rating point was assigned to all these facilities to account for potential problems involved in the actual waste generating process(es). Subcategory ratings and this additional rating point were added together to obtain the overall rating for each facility for “Hazardous Waste Management” as presented in Tables 2 and 3. This rating is an indication of the facil- ity’s relative potential to contaminate the environment and cause environ mental problems through hazardous waste management. As shown in Table 1, facilities generating over 25% corrosive waste (0002 - often generated in relatively large quantities) are assigned a sub— category rating 1 point lower than shown in the table. This is necessary because high ratings, based on handling large quantities of relatively easily managed corrosive waste, are not justified. Facilities which treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste in a surface impoundment are assigned an additional subcategory rating point per subcategory activity due to enhanced contamination potential attributed to this type of activity. ------- (able I FACILITY RAIING CRItERIA Ilaiardous Waste Hanagesenl’ Site Cont ination Wastewater D ischarges PCB/ Pesticide Storage/Use Air E.i sions I Pollutants’ Discharged at 10O ton/yr Rating Quantity 2 Generated (setric L/yr) Storage 2 Capacity (gas ) Ireat..erit’ Capacity (gal /doy) Disposal C p acit 2 Seriousness Soil/Water Conta.i- nation Bulk Storage o Naz. Material flow’ SIC 2 Rate Hazard (.gd) Potential Landffl Land (a res-tL) Appllcat on (acres) 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 7 No 7 No’ No’ z 5 No’ No’ 1 < 12 < 10,000 < 1,000 known Al) 4 5 “Sanitary only” discharges - () 2 12-50 10.000- 100,000 1,000- 50,000 - - Low Potential 5uspected or ‘ 5 - Suspect.d or Kn o wn-U’ ° I or 2 3 50-500 >100,000 >50,000 S C 10 lled lue or Suspec ted 9 - - 5-1 5 - k nown-k’s > 2 4 500- 50,000 - - S ) 10 HIgh Known - I 5-2 5 - - - S >50,000 - - - - - - - >25 - - - I Tb.. •Anla rating (or any facility generating hazardous wast•, regardless of any storag.. treate.nt or di .po ai actjvatj•s, 13 3. Facillti.s with W&A storage, tr.aC..nt and/or di.poa.4 activities are igned subcat.goi-y ratings a s zndicat.d in the table An additional point is added to all thea. taciiiti.s to accoaeit for the generating proc.ss(es) (a. e text) 2 P c1iiti.s generating over 25 of “corroaiv. only” hazardous asto (0002) are assigned a subcategor’j rating on. point loa ’sr than shown in th. table (a.. teat). S Facilities S cki stor. tr.st or diapos. ot hazardous wajto In a sua-(ace i oun snt as. assigned • rating aubcat.gory on. point high.r thmn shown ho the table. (S.. t.st) 4 Subc.t.gnrg rating is based on industrial or co ined (industrial and sanitary) flow r.tea mieza oUimrwla. stated S SIC Naa.rd Potentia l (a ni b.r (roe I (lowest) to 9 (i igh.st)j is an indication ot pot.n(i.tly hasaIul haalth .ttects related to a .p.cific Standard Jnduatrial Cl.asilLcatIon (SIC) code (see test) 6 Pollutants are particulat.a. sulfur oxidas , nitrous ojides, carbon uiwiidø .ni4 volatiA. organic carbon dsacliarq.d through point soMrc.a 7 o a no known or auap.ct.d activity in this activity category or subcategonj • Facility l isa known point source .isagon. hut not greater than 300 tons/year p .r pollutant • “S.a.pect.d” an. that aniorsation suggest . that there i activity in this category, but activity is not .p.cztic.IIV identified JO .wn activity in this category but current co.rplaanc. status with TSCA is unknown. I I ssi activity in this category and known nonco.pJianc. with TSCA regulations. U’ ------- 6 SITE CON1 INATION (CERCLA ) This category ranks facilities according to actual, suspected or potential site contamination from either past waste handling or present storage of bulk quantities of hazardous liquid material (fuel oil, gaso- line, etc.). The category is divided into three activity subcategories: (1) seriousness of site contamination problems, (2) contamination of soil and water and (3) handling of bulk quantities of hazardous liquid organic material. Information was obtained from the following EPA computer data bases: FINDS, Emergency Remedial Response Information System (ERRIS) and National Emissions Data System (NEDS). EPA Region VIII file data were used to sup- plement this information as necessary. FINDS lists all known or suspected facility sites which were contaminated as a result of past waste management practices. ERRIS tracks various EPA and State activities at these sites. Regional files contain reports of the results of any EPA/State investiga- tions (site inspections and preliminary assessmer ts) for the FINDS and ERRIS sites and brief descriptions of some of the sites. Preliminary assessment reports rate the “seriousness” of site problems as being low, medium or high and indicate the type of site contamination (soil, water), if known. NEDS contains air emissions data for the various installations, including volatile organic emissions, an indicator of the handling of bulk quantities of hazardous liquid organic material. NEDS was incomplete, and some air emissions data were obtained from various State air control agencies. Rating points were assigned to each facility for activity in each of the three subcategories using Table 1. The sum of the subcategory ratings is the facility’s overall rating for “Site Contamination” and is presented in Tables 2 and 3. An overall rating of 1 indicates that there is no known or suspected site contamination, but there is the potential for contamina- tion due to onsite handling of bulk quantities of organic hazardous material. ------- 7 It was found that preliminary assessments have not been conducted for all facilities with known or suspected* site contamination. Therefore, limited information was available on the seriousness or the extent of con- tamination, if any, at these installations. Subcategory ratings of 3 and 2, for the “seriousness of site contamination” and “soil/water contamina- tion”, respectively, were assigned to such facilities [ Table 1]. WASTEWATER DISCHARGE (CWA ) This category rates facilities according to their actual or potential to discharge contaminants to the environment through wastewater outfalls. The two subcategories used to rate facility activity in this category were (1) average daily flow rate/general wastewater type (industrial, sanitary, or both) and (2) the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)** code for the facilities waste generating activities. Information on the type and flow rate of wastewater discharges was obtained from EPA Region VIII NPDES files. SIC codes for each facility were taken from the EPA computer system (HWDMS) and Region VIII files. Hazard Potential, a number from 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) which relates potentially harmful health effects to environmental contamination from a specific industry (as identified by the SIC code), was determined for each facility using the installation SIC code and “A Manual for Evaluating Con- tamination Potential of Surface Impoundments, June 1978, EPA 570/9-78003 ”. Appropriate SIC codes were not readily available for all installations rated. In these cases, EPA Region VIII file information regarding general facility operations and waste generation was used to determine an appropriate Hazard Potential for that installation. Hazard Potential was used to help qualitate wastewater discharge in lieu of specific information on priority pollutants, as seen in Table 1***. Flow rates, general wastewater type and Hazard * Known or suspected as a result of being included in the ERRIS co uter databases ** The SIC co d. is a ntber which describes an industry by the type of activity in which it is engaged. Priority pollutants as defined in The Federal Register, Volt e 44, No. 233, December 3, 1979 ------- 8 Potential were used with Table 1 to assign ratings to each facility in each subcategory. Subcategory ratings were totaled to obtain the wastewater discharge rating presented for each facility in Tables 2 and 3. Many of the facilities prioritized do not have direct wastewater dis- charges (i.e., do not treat their own wastewater); rather, they discharge to a regional treatment system for disposal. Because treatment and discharge are not under the Federal facilities control, these installations were given a zero rating. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL/PESTICIDE STORAGE AND USE (TSCA/FIFRA ) This category rates facilities according to information regarding use of PCBs/pesticides and known instances of noncompliance with ISCA regula- tions. Information to identify facilities storing/using these compounds was obtained through all possible sources including HWDMS and Region VIII files. Region VIII files were used to identify facilities which were out of compliance with TSCA regulations for the last 1 year. Facilities were rated according to Table 1. Department of Defense facilities and Veterans Administration (VA) Hospitals with no available information regarding PCB/ pesticide use or compliance status (with TSCA regulations) were rated a 2, a point lower than facilities with known ISCA noncompliance Liable 1). This is because information indicates that most military installations han- dle PCBs and pesticides, and most VA Hospitals have PCB equipment. Past EPA TSCA inspection results suggest that a majority of these faclities are out of compliance with applicable TSCA regulations. Category ratings for each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3. AIR EMISSIONS (CMi This category rates facilities according to the number of selected air pollutants (particulates, nitrous oxides, sulfur oxides, volatile organic carbon and carbon monoxide) discharged through point sources at a rate of greater than 100 tons/year. The 100 tons/year rate was used because it is the emission rate normally used to differentiate between major and minor ------- 9 point air emission sources. Information on emission rates was obtained from the National Emission Data Systems (NEDS), an EPA computer database containing information on permitted point air emission sources. Because NEDS did not contain information on all known emission point sources, some emission data were obtained from the various State air control agencies. Facilities were rated quantitatively according to Table 1. Results for each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3. No attempt was made to qual- itatively rate the air emissions for each installation due to lack of per- tinent information. Likewise, no attempt was made to incorporate fugitive emissions into the rating system. ------- 10 RESULTS Table 2 shows the selected Federal facilities and their assigned ratings ranked in decreasing order of overall potential for environmental problems. Table 3 presents these same facilities (and their ratings) seg- regated by State and alphabetized by the city in which they are located. These tables are not only useful in identifying facilities with relatively high potential for environmental problems, but they also show which activ- ity(ies) at each facility contribute most/least to this potential. Such information can be used to help develop a strategy for followup site inspections. As previously stated, the facility rating was not designed to be com- pared to a fixed number to indicate whether an installation is environmen- tally “good” or “bad”. Rather, the rating indicates the potential of a particular facility to have environmental problems based on the potential for environmental contamination relative to other installations. A rela- tively high total rating indicates that, based on the type and level of onsite activities, a facility has a high probability of having environmen tal problems. It a1so indicates that further in-depth evaluation of the facility is warranted. It should be noted that this prioritization system was meant to be only an initial evaluation of selected facilities. Because of the general nature of the information used, in-depth evaluations should be conducted to verify or deny a facility’s rating, prior to any onsite investigations. In—depth evaluations should begin with detailed analysis of EPA Region VIII files. ------- Tab leZ 11 FACILITY RATINOS (By Ranking) EPA Focility ise Hazardous SIts Point PCB/Psstlclda Point to t.ocat lon/ waste Cont Wastawater Storsg Air Total No. A rws Mansgsflt inatiOn Discharges and Us. EalesiOns Rating C05210020769 Rocky mt .a1n Arsinil 131 8 4 3 O 23 NortJVOf Stil.to A1r ort 1 .23’7’ CosrCs City, CO 80022 UT0571724350 4111 AIr Force Bass 10 9 4 2 2 27 2849 AFB/DEEXX Hill AF8, UT 84056 U75210090002 Toosls Any Depot 111 8 0 2 2 23 Stats Highway 36 bosh, UI $4074 C 08213820725 PueDlO Depot Activity U S Any 9 7 2 2 2 22 7Smi NEat Hwy 50 PueblO, CO 81002 C02210020150 Ft Carson 71 6 4 2 1 20 OFAE, Bldg. 304, AFZC Fort Carson. CO 80913 M04573 ,924758 M1r ot Air Force Bass 101 6 1 2 1 20 Facility 1982 Minot AFB. MO 58701 u10570090001 Utah Teat & Training Rang. 13 5 0 2 0 20 6 j miles SE of Wendover. ‘iT 84056 S02571924844 Ellsworth Air Force Base 51 6 4 2 1 19 44 CSG/SAC 1lswortri AFB, 50 57706 N03571924759 Grand Forks Air Force Base 4 6 3 2 2 17 S ci E of main gate Grand Forks AFB. MO 58201 C07890010526 U S DOE. Rocky Flats Plant 3 5 3 2 1 14 16 ci NW of Denver Golden, CO 80402 1478571924556 Malestros AFB 3 5 0 2 2 13 Facility 1501 Perle. Malestro. AFB. M l ’ 59402 C0157 1524130 Lowry Air Force Base 3 6 0 2 1 12 6th and Quebec. 13415 0.nv.r, CO 80230 C09571924191 Peterson Air Force Bas. 3 6 0 2 1 12 Lat/Long 38-4.8—36/1 Colorado Springs, CO 80914 C08211620333 USA. Fitzsimons Any Medical Center 3 5 1 2 1 12 C02210020333 Colta.x and Peoria Aurora, CD 80045 MD9210022779 Concrete Missile Early Warning Station 3 5 0 2 0 10 Oct 1 57 A0/OE Concrete, NO 58221 119210020922 Defense Depot Ogden 3 6 0 0 1 10 (‘17971549855) 500 welt 12th Street Ogden, UT 84407 (US000-OLA) NOO97 I .52 8807 DFSP GraM Forks 3 5 2 0 0 10 (M00971528836) Grand Forks AFB, 42 N Grand Forks, NO 58201 (US 000-OL .A) C06470000500 Denver Federal Canter 31 5 0 2 0 (C04.690090010) 6th and Kipling (C09470090011) Denver, CO 80225 (FNWA Central Direct Fed. Div Mat (Federal Supply Facility) ------- Table 2 (Cant.) FACtIITY RATINGS (By Ranting) Faclflty Ns 4uarlou$ L.acatf on! West. Address SAIgISInt U.S. Suresi of Reclsistion 0 LeadV 1lS Or. Tunnel, 2 ci. E of Leadwills Leidivill., CO 80441 USGS - EROS Data Canter 0 1000 Pecora Way Garrutson, SD 57030 Warren AFB 3 Cheyenne, WV 82001 Hot Springs VA Ios 1tal 0 5th St. , Sec. 13-T7S-R Hot Sorings. SO 57747 M.tiDollSO and Radiation Res LaDoratory 3 1604 College Street Solar Energy Research Institute 3 1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO 80401 PdA Silver King Mines, Inc. 3 U S HIghway 18 Edgecont, SD 57735 USAF Acadsy 3 10 ii N of Colorado Soririgs Colorado Sgrtngs, CO 80907 Western Area Power A iri . 3 Casger Field Br qest of Mt. View on Mills, WY 82644 Western Area Power A in , 3 Watertown SuD. ici Eof 1-29 Watertown, SD 572C1 Western Research Iristitute/UWYRC 3 lmi NOnUS Larailie, WY 82070 Western Research tri,titute/UWVRC 3 9th and Lewis Streets Laraaie, WY 82071 Buckley Air National Bass 3 Buckley Ang Base Aurora. CO 80011 Duqway Proving Grounds 3 45 ii W of bode Dugway, UT 84022 Little Mountain Test Annex 0 900 S. 10800 W. Ogden, UT 84404 National Bureau of Standards 3 325 Bree ay Boulder. CO 80303 National Center for Atsispher c Research 3 1850 Table Mesa Dr Boulder. CD 80303 Western Area Power Adein 3 Brush Field Branch 17532 Hwy. 71 Brush, CO 80723 Anvil Points 011 Shale Facility 3 8 ii west of Rifle Rifle, CO 81650 12 EPA ID No. C02142306964 506140000021 WV5571924179 S0236 00 10282 NO5].2 0514687 C04890000017 S0664009 003 5 C 08572924928 WY 3890090001 501890090029 W ’Y 1890031874 WY 289003 1873 C0957002 5644 uT3750211259 U 1857002 556 1 . C09 13 1 505175 C03490016042 C08890090006 C0989003 1876 5 0 Sit. Cont.a inetlon Point Wastswetar Discharges Storige and Use Air Egissions Totel Rating 5 5 0 0 10 5 4 0 0 9 1 1 2 2 9 5 0 2 1 B 5 0 0 0 B 5 0 0 0 B 5 0 0 0 8 0 1 2 2 - 8 5 0 0 0 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 8 5 0 0 0 B L 0 2 1 7 1 0 2 1 7 5 0 2 0 7 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 ------- TibI• 2 (Ccnt. ) FACILITY RATINGS 3 (By R.nk$ng) EPA 10 No Ficility PIm. I.oc.atlen/ $ 5 K&z irIOuS ..ta MiflI9Ifit Sits ContN- InIC O Point WSstiwit.r 0 iChi? I$ PC8/Peit1 i Stor&qs 4fl USC Point Air E&isions T t i) Ratlnq c09890090005 Western Area O sr jn., 1300 South Rio Grands PIontroi., CO 81401 Pover OD’ 4 0 0 0 0 4 C052451534U U.S. Sureiu of R.claaatlon Water ana Pover Resources 910 Van Buren Lflv aPand. CO 80537 Ser ic. 3 0 0 0 0 3 C00180000044 U. S. Post.aJ Services 1501. Wynk000 St. Denver. CO 80201 3 0 0 0 0 3 W1736001O329 VA Medical Canter Fort 40 Sh.riCan. WY 82801 0 0 0 2 1 3 C01890090003 Western Arai Power KrtNIlng Lrn.s SC 13 MIles Soutfl on I$uy 9 Krehnq, CO 80435 3 0 0 0 0 3 L Act7 .LIL or prupoa.d c.ncraL&z.d ? aztr oui nice stor.g. faC 1Lt9 at thu Locacuon (Oet.nJ. Property D ipoia1 S.rvic.) 2 o C oen ict V1ty Ln thu.s cat.qory ------- Facility I s Locatlonl oCk Nountain Arsenal North ol St 1ston Airport Corce City, CO 80022 Pueblo Oscot Activity - U S. Arley 75.i. NE of Hwy SO Pueblo, CO 31002 Ft. Carson OFAE. Bldg. 304, AFZC Fort Carson, CO 80913 U S. DOE, Rocky Flats Punt 16 •i Pf 1 of Denver Golden, CO 80402 USA. Fltzsiaons Ar.y Ned cal Cant.r ColPax and PIQrTI Aurora, CO 80045 Pitirion Air Force Base LatJLong 38-48-36/I. Coloraoo Springs, CO 8091.4 L owry Air Force Bail 6th and Quebec, *3415 Oenver, CO 30230 O.nver Federal Center 6th and Aipling Oenver, CO 80225 (Fl1WA Central Direct Fed Div Nat (Federal SupOly Facility) U S Bureau of Reclamation Leadville Dr Tuflfl 1, 2 iii E of Lead ’ville Leadville, CO 80461 USAF Academy 10 ii N of Colorado Springs Colorado Springs, CD 80907 Solar Energy R.searcn Institute 161.7 Cola Blvd. Golden, CO 80401 Buckley Air Matlonil Base Buckley Ang Bass Aurora, CD 80011 National Center or At ospharic Research 1850 Tibls Nesa Or Boulder, CD 83303 National Bureau of Stindards 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80303 Wsst*rn Ant Power A i n Brush Field Branch 11532 y. 11. Bruit ,, CO 80723 Westarn Area Power Adei ii , Power Oper 1800 South Rio Grtnds liontrose, CO 81401 Anvil Points Gil Shale Facility 8 ii west of Rifle Rifle, CO 81650 U S. PostAl Services 1501 Wynkoop St. Denver, CO 80201 Tale 3 FACILITY MTINGS (By Location) lazardeul Sita Point waste Cont - Wastewater Msnagsnt thation Olschargu 131 8 4 9 7 2 7% 6 4 3 5 3 3 5 1 3 6 0 3 6 0 31 5 0 PCS/PS sticlde Point Storage Air and Us. Esissions Rating 3 o 28 2 2 22 2 1 20 2 1 14 2 1 12 2 1 12 2 1 12 2 0 10 EPA 10 1 10. CO521 002 0769 C 08213820725 C02213020L50 CO 7890010526 C0821162 0333 C0221002 0333 C09571924191 CD 157 1524 130 C 064 70000500 (C04.690090010) (C09470090 01 1) C0214Z3 06966 C08572924928 C 04890000 017 C0957 0 025644 C03490016 042 C091315 0517 5 C088900900 06 C 0989 0090 00 5 C 0989003 1876 C 0 0180000044 0 5 5 0 0 10 3 0 1 2 2 8 3 5 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 2 1 7 3 0 0 2 0 5 3 0 0 2 0 5 3 0 0 2 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 4 3 0 3 0 0 3 ------- tibls 3 (Cont.) FACILITY RATINGS 15 (By Location) EPA Ficility fl 4aZsrdous Sit. Point PC3/Pt$ti de Point waste Cont — Wa.t.watsr Storage Air NO. Add ss Msn19u fit inetion Olscnsrges ana usa EI,iSSIOnS Rating C01890090003 Wsstap’n 3 0 0 0 0 3 krallnq Line. SC 13 Mfles South on wy 9 Krlling, CD 80435 C05245153411 . U.S. 3uraai of Recleestion 3 0 0 0 0 3 Watir and Poiier Resources Services 910 Van Buren Loveland. CD 80537 VMTAIA MT8571924555 Malnitroa 03 31 s o 2 2 13 Facility 1501 P.rim. Mal. .tro. AFB, MT 59402 NORTH DAKOTA M04Sfl924758 Mlriot Air Force 8ase jØI 6 1 2 1 20 Facility 1982 Minot AFO. NO 58101 N03571924759 Grand Forts Air For Base 4 6 3 2 2 Li 5 ci E or main gate Grand Forks 08. M D 58201 N09210022779 Concrete M1 si1s Early Warning Station 3 5 0 2 0 10 Oat 157 AD/Of Concrete, ND 58221 M0 097 15298 07 DFSP GrenO Forts 3 5 2 0 a 10 (N00971528.8)6) Grand Forts AFB, 42 N Grand Forks, NO 58201 (US 0 0 0-OLA) • ‘ D5I20514667 Metabolism an Radiation Laboratory 3 5 0 0 0 3 1504 College Street Fargo, NO 58105 SOUTH DAKOTA S02 571924644 Ellswortn Air F rc. Base 6 4 2 1 [ 9 44 CSG/SAC Ellsworth 09, SD 51706 506140000021 USGS - EROS Data Center 0 5 4 0 0 1000 Pecora Way Garretson, SO 57030 506640090035 IVA Silver king Mines, Inc. 3 5 0 0 0 8 U S r4igiiway LB Edg ont. SD 57735 S02360010282 Hot Springs A Hospital 0 5 0 2 1. 8 5th St. • S . C. 1317S—R Hat Springs, SD 57747 501890090029 starn Area Power A in , 3 5 0 0 0 8 Watertown SuD. I •1. E of I29 Watertown, SD 57201 UTAH U1057 1724350 Hill Air Force Bass 10 9 4 2 2 27 2349 AFB/DEEX 141)1 00, UT 34056 U15210090002 Toosle Army Depot 11’ 3 0 2 2 23 State HIghway 36 boi l., UT 84074 ------- Tab). 3 (Cont.) 16 FACILITY AT1NGS (By Location) EPA Facility IazardOul Site Point PCB/Pelticid. Point tO &tioiiJ last. Cont.- Wist.wst.r Storage Mr Total A44pu Maniqesent natIon Discharges and Use Esissions Rating J10570090001 Utai lest & Trelninq Binge 13 5 0 2 0 20 5 ci lii SE of WeMover. UT 84056 Watertown. 50 57201 U19210020922 Defense Oe ot Ogden 3 6 0 0 1 (uT7971549855) 500 West 12th Street Ogaen, UT 84407 (US000OLA) uT37S02112 59 Ougway Provthg Crounds 3 1 0 2 1 7 45 ci I of 10011. Ougway, UT 84022 UT8570025561 Little Mountain Test Annex 0 5 0 2 0 7 900 5 10800 I Ogden, uT 84404 WYOMING ,(Y5571924179 Warren AF8 3 1 1 2 2 Cheyenne. WY 82001 1Y 1890033 .874 western Bis.ar n Institute/U’WYRC 3 5 0 0 0 3 imi M n US Laracia. WY 82070 WY2890031873 Western Re earcfl tr stitute UWYRC 3 5 0 0 0 8 9th arid Lewis Streets Laraels, WY 82071 i13890090001. Western Area Power A in 3 5 0 0 0 8 Casoer Field Br West of Mt View on Mills, W Y 82644 wY7360010329 VA Medical Center 0 0 0 2 1 3 Fart RD Sheridan, NY 82801 L ActtLal or propos..d c.ncra1 ud huardeus rusti oraq. faci.L j c c this £ocac on (D.f.nz. Prop.r’V Oz,pcsal S.r?zc•) 2 No imocn acc vzty ui this cac.gor’j ------- |