330/1—84—003
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITV RANKING OF
SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION VIII
\ September 1984
J 1
II — I
: b

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
330/1—84—003
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING OF
SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION VIII
September 1984
Eugene Lubieniecki , Jr.
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Denver, Colorado

-------
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . 1
METHODS . . . . . 3
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA) 3
SITE CONTAMINATION (CERCLA) 6
wAS1E ATER DISCHARGE (CWA) 7
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL/PESTICIDE STORAGE
AND USE (TSCA/FIFRA) 8
AIR EMISSIONS (CAA) 8
RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
TABLES
1 Facility Rating Criteria S
2 Facility Ratings (by ranking) 11
3 Facility Ratings (by location) 14

-------
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING OF
SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES - REGION VIII
INTRODUCTION
A multi-media priority ranking system was developed to evaluate
selected Region VIII Federal facilities according to their relative poten-
tial for having environmental problems. The system was developed to use
readily available information in a rapid and objective manner to identify
“high priority” facilities for further detailed evaluation by EPA. The
ranking system was not designed to compare a facility rating with any fixed
number to indicate whether a facility is environmentally “good” or “bad”.
Rather, the rating indicates a facility’s potential, relative to other
installations, for having major environmental problems (i.e., a high rating
indicates that a facility has a relatively high potential for environmental
problems), and that further evaluation, if not already completed, is
warranted.
Rating criteria were developed and used to rate facilities according
to the type and intensity of facility activities which could actually or
potentially result in environmental contamination. In general, these activ-
ities include past and present hazardous waste** generation and management,
wastewater discharges, air emissions, and handling and storage of hazardous
material. For purposes of this ranking system and in keeping with EPA
Region VIII and ieadquarters priorities, potential environmental problems
from hazardous waste management activity were rated higher than potential
problems from other activities. To ensure timely but meaningful comparisons
between installations, the information used to rank the facilities was con-
fined to that which was easily accessible and available for all or most of
the installations. Thus, much of the facility information used came from
* Environmental problems as used h•re, are directly related to the
release of contaminants to the environment.
** As defined in 40 CER 261

-------
2
various EPA coaput.r databases. This information was supplemented as
necessary with Region V III file data. More specific information, such as
detailed site inspection reports, was not used here because such information
is available for only a few facilities.* This report describes the rating
criteria and information sources, and it details how they were used to rank
the selected facilities.
* Specific facility information would be used as part of the detailed
followup evaluation of a facility, if warranted.

-------
3
METHODS
An initial listing of Federal facilities in Region VIII was obtained
from EPA’s computerized Facilities Index System (FINDS). This list con-
tains approximately 175 Federal installations with known or suspected haz-
ardous waste disposal sites (active and inactive), Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit applications on file with EPA, National Pol-
lutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits and/or air emission
point sources. Of these, approximately 50 were selected by Region VIII for
prioritizatiofl by NEIC.
These selected facilities were ranked based on the type and relative
level of activity in the following five categories:
Hazardous waste management
• Site contamination (known and potential)
Wastewater discharge
Polychiorinated biphenols (PCBs)/pest’icides storage and use
• Air emissions
These five categories generally reflect pertinent activities regulated
under one or more of the six environmental acts: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA)/Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Clean Air Act (CM), respectively. The five rating categories and an ex-
planation of the information used to rank facilities in each category
follows.
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA )
This category ranks facilities according to the potential for environ-
mental contamination through generation and handling of hazardous waste.
For rating purposes, the category was divided into four activity subcate-
gories: (1) annual quantity of hazardous waste generated, (2) waste storage

-------
4
design capacIty, (3) waste treat nent design capacity and (4) waste disposal
design capacity. These general subcategories were used because of the type
of information readily available and the wide range of possible activities
and levels of activities related to hazardous waste management.
The major source of information used was the EPA Hazardous Waste Data
Management System (HWDMS), a computer database which contains information
submitted to EPA by hazardous waste generation/handling facilities as part
of their Part A RCRA permit application. The data include type of hazard-
ous waste handling activity, design capacity of waste processes and type
and quantity of waste generated and subsequently handled. Because the com-
puter database was incomplete (all information was not available for all
hazardous waste facilities), some of this information was obtained from EPA-
Region VIII RCRA files.
The minimum rating for any facility generating hazardous waste is 3.
This accounts for activities involving actual generating and any short term
or small quantity handling of waste by the facility. Generating facilities
with RCRA storage, treatment or disposal activities were rated according to
the relative level of activity in each subcategory as shown in Table 1. An
additional rating point was assigned to all these facilities to account for
potential problems involved in the actual waste generating process(es).
Subcategory ratings and this additional rating point were added together to
obtain the overall rating for each facility for “Hazardous Waste Management”
as presented in Tables 2 and 3. This rating is an indication of the facil-
ity’s relative potential to contaminate the environment and cause environ
mental problems through hazardous waste management.
As shown in Table 1, facilities generating over 25% corrosive waste
(0002 - often generated in relatively large quantities) are assigned a sub—
category rating 1 point lower than shown in the table. This is necessary
because high ratings, based on handling large quantities of relatively
easily managed corrosive waste, are not justified. Facilities which treat,
store or dispose of hazardous waste in a surface impoundment are assigned
an additional subcategory rating point per subcategory activity due to
enhanced contamination potential attributed to this type of activity.

-------
(able I
FACILITY RAIING CRItERIA
Ilaiardous Waste Hanagesenl’
Site
Cont ination
Wastewater
D ischarges
PCB/
Pesticide
Storage/Use
Air E.i sions
I Pollutants’
Discharged at
10O ton/yr
Rating
Quantity 2
Generated
(setric L/yr)
Storage 2
Capacity
(gas )
Ireat..erit’
Capacity
(gal /doy)
Disposal C p
acit 2
Seriousness
Soil/Water
Conta.i-
nation
Bulk
Storage
o Naz.
Material
flow’ SIC 2
Rate Hazard
(.gd) Potential
Landffl Land
(a res-tL)
Appllcat on
(acres)
0
0
0
0
0
0
No 7
No 7
No’
No’ z 5
No’
No’
1
< 12
< 10,000
< 1,000
known
Al) 4 5
“Sanitary
only”
discharges
-
()
2
12-50
10.000-
100,000
1,000-
50,000
-
-
Low
Potential
5uspected
or
‘ 5 -
Suspect.d
or Kn o wn-U’ °
I or 2
3
50-500
>100,000
>50,000
S
C 10
lled lue or
Suspec ted 9
-
-
5-1 5 -
k nown-k’s
> 2
4
500-
50,000
-
-
S
) 10
HIgh
Known
-
I 5-2 5 -
-
-
S
>50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
>25 -
-
-
I Tb.. •Anla rating (or any facility generating hazardous wast•, regardless of any storag.. treate.nt or di .po ai actjvatj•s, 13 3. Facillti.s
with W&A storage, tr.aC..nt and/or di.poa.4 activities are igned subcat.goi-y ratings a s zndicat.d in the table An additional point is added to all
thea. taciiiti.s to accoaeit for the generating proc.ss(es) (a. e text)
2 P c1iiti.s generating over 25 of “corroaiv. only” hazardous asto (0002) are assigned a subcategor’j rating on. point loa ’sr than shown in th. table
(a.. teat).
S Facilities S cki stor. tr.st or diapos. ot hazardous wajto In a sua-(ace i oun snt as. assigned • rating aubcat.gory on. point high.r thmn shown
ho the table. (S.. t.st)
4 Subc.t.gnrg rating is based on industrial or co ined (industrial and sanitary) flow r.tea mieza oUimrwla. stated
S SIC Naa.rd Potentia l (a ni b.r (roe I (lowest) to 9 (i igh.st)j is an indication ot pot.n(i.tly hasaIul haalth .ttects related to a .p.cific Standard
Jnduatrial Cl.asilLcatIon (SIC) code (see test)
6 Pollutants are particulat.a. sulfur oxidas , nitrous ojides, carbon uiwiidø .ni4 volatiA. organic carbon dsacliarq.d through point soMrc.a
7 o a no known or auap.ct.d activity in this activity category or subcategonj
• Facility l isa known point source .isagon. hut not greater than 300 tons/year p .r pollutant
• “S.a.pect.d” an. that aniorsation suggest . that there i activity in this category, but activity is not .p.cztic.IIV identified
JO .wn activity in this category but current co.rplaanc. status with TSCA is unknown.
I I ssi activity in this category and known nonco.pJianc. with TSCA regulations.
U’

-------
6
SITE CON1 INATION (CERCLA )
This category ranks facilities according to actual, suspected or
potential site contamination from either past waste handling or present
storage of bulk quantities of hazardous liquid material (fuel oil, gaso-
line, etc.). The category is divided into three activity subcategories:
(1) seriousness of site contamination problems, (2) contamination of soil
and water and (3) handling of bulk quantities of hazardous liquid organic
material.
Information was obtained from the following EPA computer data bases:
FINDS, Emergency Remedial Response Information System (ERRIS) and National
Emissions Data System (NEDS). EPA Region VIII file data were used to sup-
plement this information as necessary. FINDS lists all known or suspected
facility sites which were contaminated as a result of past waste management
practices. ERRIS tracks various EPA and State activities at these sites.
Regional files contain reports of the results of any EPA/State investiga-
tions (site inspections and preliminary assessmer ts) for the FINDS and ERRIS
sites and brief descriptions of some of the sites. Preliminary assessment
reports rate the “seriousness” of site problems as being low, medium or
high and indicate the type of site contamination (soil, water), if known.
NEDS contains air emissions data for the various installations, including
volatile organic emissions, an indicator of the handling of bulk quantities
of hazardous liquid organic material. NEDS was incomplete, and some air
emissions data were obtained from various State air control agencies.
Rating points were assigned to each facility for activity in each of
the three subcategories using Table 1. The sum of the subcategory ratings
is the facility’s overall rating for “Site Contamination” and is presented
in Tables 2 and 3. An overall rating of 1 indicates that there is no known
or suspected site contamination, but there is the potential for contamina-
tion due to onsite handling of bulk quantities of organic hazardous material.

-------
7
It was found that preliminary assessments have not been conducted for
all facilities with known or suspected* site contamination. Therefore,
limited information was available on the seriousness or the extent of con-
tamination, if any, at these installations. Subcategory ratings of 3 and
2, for the “seriousness of site contamination” and “soil/water contamina-
tion”, respectively, were assigned to such facilities [ Table 1].
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE (CWA )
This category rates facilities according to their actual or potential
to discharge contaminants to the environment through wastewater outfalls.
The two subcategories used to rate facility activity in this category were
(1) average daily flow rate/general wastewater type (industrial, sanitary,
or both) and (2) the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)** code for
the facilities waste generating activities.
Information on the type and flow rate of wastewater discharges was
obtained from EPA Region VIII NPDES files. SIC codes for each facility
were taken from the EPA computer system (HWDMS) and Region VIII files.
Hazard Potential, a number from 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) which relates
potentially harmful health effects to environmental contamination from a
specific industry (as identified by the SIC code), was determined for each
facility using the installation SIC code and “A Manual for Evaluating Con-
tamination Potential of Surface Impoundments, June 1978, EPA 570/9-78003 ”.
Appropriate SIC codes were not readily available for all installations rated.
In these cases, EPA Region VIII file information regarding general facility
operations and waste generation was used to determine an appropriate Hazard
Potential for that installation. Hazard Potential was used to help qualitate
wastewater discharge in lieu of specific information on priority pollutants,
as seen in Table 1***. Flow rates, general wastewater type and Hazard
* Known or suspected as a result of being included in the ERRIS co uter
databases
** The SIC co d. is a ntber which describes an industry by the type of
activity in which it is engaged.
Priority pollutants as defined in The Federal Register, Volt e 44,
No. 233, December 3, 1979

-------
8
Potential were used with Table 1 to assign ratings to each facility in each
subcategory. Subcategory ratings were totaled to obtain the wastewater
discharge rating presented for each facility in Tables 2 and 3.
Many of the facilities prioritized do not have direct wastewater dis-
charges (i.e., do not treat their own wastewater); rather, they discharge to
a regional treatment system for disposal. Because treatment and discharge
are not under the Federal facilities control, these installations were given
a zero rating.
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL/PESTICIDE STORAGE AND USE (TSCA/FIFRA )
This category rates facilities according to information regarding use
of PCBs/pesticides and known instances of noncompliance with ISCA regula-
tions. Information to identify facilities storing/using these compounds
was obtained through all possible sources including HWDMS and Region VIII
files. Region VIII files were used to identify facilities which were out
of compliance with TSCA regulations for the last 1 year. Facilities were
rated according to Table 1. Department of Defense facilities and Veterans
Administration (VA) Hospitals with no available information regarding PCB/
pesticide use or compliance status (with TSCA regulations) were rated a 2,
a point lower than facilities with known ISCA noncompliance Liable 1).
This is because information indicates that most military installations han-
dle PCBs and pesticides, and most VA Hospitals have PCB equipment. Past
EPA TSCA inspection results suggest that a majority of these faclities are
out of compliance with applicable TSCA regulations. Category ratings for
each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
AIR EMISSIONS (CMi
This category rates facilities according to the number of selected air
pollutants (particulates, nitrous oxides, sulfur oxides, volatile organic
carbon and carbon monoxide) discharged through point sources at a rate of
greater than 100 tons/year. The 100 tons/year rate was used because it is
the emission rate normally used to differentiate between major and minor

-------
9
point air emission sources. Information on emission rates was obtained
from the National Emission Data Systems (NEDS), an EPA computer database
containing information on permitted point air emission sources. Because
NEDS did not contain information on all known emission point sources, some
emission data were obtained from the various State air control agencies.
Facilities were rated quantitatively according to Table 1. Results for
each facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3. No attempt was made to qual-
itatively rate the air emissions for each installation due to lack of per-
tinent information. Likewise, no attempt was made to incorporate fugitive
emissions into the rating system.

-------
10
RESULTS
Table 2 shows the selected Federal facilities and their assigned
ratings ranked in decreasing order of overall potential for environmental
problems. Table 3 presents these same facilities (and their ratings) seg-
regated by State and alphabetized by the city in which they are located.
These tables are not only useful in identifying facilities with relatively
high potential for environmental problems, but they also show which activ-
ity(ies) at each facility contribute most/least to this potential. Such
information can be used to help develop a strategy for followup site
inspections.
As previously stated, the facility rating was not designed to be com-
pared to a fixed number to indicate whether an installation is environmen-
tally “good” or “bad”. Rather, the rating indicates the potential of a
particular facility to have environmental problems based on the potential
for environmental contamination relative to other installations. A rela-
tively high total rating indicates that, based on the type and level of
onsite activities, a facility has a high probability of having environmen
tal problems. It a1so indicates that further in-depth evaluation of the
facility is warranted.
It should be noted that this prioritization system was meant to be
only an initial evaluation of selected facilities. Because of the general
nature of the information used, in-depth evaluations should be conducted to
verify or deny a facility’s rating, prior to any onsite investigations.
In—depth evaluations should begin with detailed analysis of EPA Region VIII
files.

-------
Tab leZ 11
FACILITY RATINOS
(By Ranking)
EPA Focility ise Hazardous SIts Point PCB/Psstlclda Point
to t.ocat lon/ waste Cont Wastawater Storsg Air Total
No. A rws Mansgsflt inatiOn Discharges and Us. EalesiOns Rating
C05210020769 Rocky mt .a1n Arsinil 131 8 4 3 O 23
NortJVOf Stil.to A1r ort 1 .23’7’
CosrCs City, CO 80022
UT0571724350 4111 AIr Force Bass 10 9 4 2 2 27
2849 AFB/DEEXX
Hill AF8, UT 84056
U75210090002 Toosls Any Depot 111 8 0 2 2 23
Stats Highway 36
bosh, UI $4074
C 08213820725 PueDlO Depot Activity U S Any 9 7 2 2 2 22
7Smi NEat Hwy 50
PueblO, CO 81002
C02210020150 Ft Carson 71 6 4 2 1 20
OFAE, Bldg. 304, AFZC
Fort Carson. CO 80913
M04573 ,924758 M1r ot Air Force Bass 101 6 1 2 1 20
Facility 1982
Minot AFB. MO 58701
u10570090001 Utah Teat & Training Rang. 13 5 0 2 0 20
6 j miles SE of Wendover. ‘iT 84056
S02571924844 Ellsworth Air Force Base 51 6 4 2 1 19
44 CSG/SAC
1lswortri AFB, 50 57706
N03571924759 Grand Forks Air Force Base 4 6 3 2 2 17
S ci E of main gate
Grand Forks AFB. MO 58201
C07890010526 U S DOE. Rocky Flats Plant 3 5 3 2 1 14
16 ci NW of Denver
Golden, CO 80402
1478571924556 Malestros AFB 3 5 0 2 2 13
Facility 1501 Perle.
Malestro. AFB. M l ’ 59402
C0157 1524130 Lowry Air Force Base 3 6 0 2 1 12
6th and Quebec. 13415
0.nv.r, CO 80230
C09571924191 Peterson Air Force Bas. 3 6 0 2 1 12
Lat/Long 38-4.8—36/1
Colorado Springs, CO 80914
C08211620333 USA. Fitzsimons Any Medical Center 3 5 1 2 1 12
C02210020333 Colta.x and Peoria
Aurora, CD 80045
MD9210022779 Concrete Missile Early Warning Station 3 5 0 2 0 10
Oct 1 57 A0/OE
Concrete, NO 58221
119210020922 Defense Depot Ogden 3 6 0 0 1 10
(‘17971549855) 500 welt 12th Street
Ogden, UT 84407
(US000-OLA)
NOO97 I .52 8807 DFSP GraM Forks 3 5 2 0 0 10
(M00971528836) Grand Forks AFB, 42 N
Grand Forks, NO 58201
(US 000-OL .A)
C06470000500 Denver Federal Canter 31 5 0 2 0
(C04.690090010) 6th and Kipling
(C09470090011) Denver, CO 80225
(FNWA Central Direct Fed. Div Mat
(Federal Supply Facility)

-------
Table 2 (Cant.)
FACtIITY RATINGS
(By Ranting)
Faclflty Ns 4uarlou$
L.acatf on! West.
Address SAIgISInt
U.S. Suresi of Reclsistion 0
LeadV 1lS Or. Tunnel, 2 ci. E of Leadwills
Leidivill., CO 80441
USGS - EROS Data Canter 0
1000 Pecora Way
Garrutson, SD 57030
Warren AFB 3
Cheyenne, WV 82001
Hot Springs VA Ios 1tal 0
5th St. , Sec. 13-T7S-R
Hot Sorings. SO 57747
M.tiDollSO and Radiation Res LaDoratory 3
1604 College Street
Solar Energy Research Institute 3
1617 Cole Blvd.
Golden, CO 80401
PdA Silver King Mines, Inc. 3
U S HIghway 18
Edgecont, SD 57735
USAF Acadsy 3
10 ii N of Colorado Soririgs
Colorado Sgrtngs, CO 80907
Western Area Power A iri . 3
Casger Field Br
qest of Mt. View on
Mills, WY 82644
Western Area Power A in , 3
Watertown SuD.
ici Eof 1-29
Watertown, SD 572C1
Western Research Iristitute/UWYRC 3
lmi NOnUS
Larailie, WY 82070
Western Research tri,titute/UWVRC 3
9th and Lewis Streets
Laraaie, WY 82071
Buckley Air National Bass 3
Buckley Ang Base
Aurora. CO 80011
Duqway Proving Grounds 3
45 ii W of bode
Dugway, UT 84022
Little Mountain Test Annex 0
900 S. 10800 W.
Ogden, UT 84404
National Bureau of Standards 3
325 Bree ay
Boulder. CO 80303
National Center for Atsispher c Research 3
1850 Table Mesa Dr
Boulder. CD 80303
Western Area Power Adein 3
Brush Field Branch
17532 Hwy. 71
Brush, CO 80723
Anvil Points 011 Shale Facility 3
8 ii west of Rifle
Rifle, CO 81650
12
EPA
ID
No.
C02142306964
506140000021
WV5571924179
S0236 00 10282
NO5].2 0514687
C04890000017
S0664009 003 5
C 08572924928
WY 3890090001
501890090029
W ’Y 1890031874
WY 289003 1873
C0957002 5644
uT3750211259
U 1857002 556 1 .
C09 13 1 505175
C03490016042
C08890090006
C0989003 1876
5
0
Sit.
Cont.a
inetlon
Point
Wastswetar
Discharges
Storige
and Use
Air
Egissions
Totel
Rating
5
5
0
0
10
5
4
0
0
9
1
1
2
2
9
5
0
2
1
B
5
0
0
0
B
5
0
0
0
B
5
0
0
0
8
0
1
2
2 -
8
5
0
0
0
8
0
8
5
0
0
0
8
5
0
0
0
B
L
0
2
1
7
1
0
2
1
7
5
0
2
0
7
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
2
0
5
0
1
0
0

-------
TibI• 2 (Ccnt. )
FACILITY RATINGS 3
(By R.nk$ng)
EPA
10
No
Ficility PIm.
I.oc.atlen/
$ 5
K&z irIOuS
..ta
MiflI9Ifit
Sits
ContN-
InIC O
Point
WSstiwit.r
0 iChi? I$
PC8/Peit1 i
Stor&qs
4fl USC
Point
Air
E&isions
T t i)
Ratlnq
c09890090005
Western Area O sr jn.,
1300 South Rio Grands
PIontroi., CO 81401
Pover OD’
4
0
0
0
0
4
C052451534U
U.S. Sureiu of R.claaatlon
Water ana Pover Resources
910 Van Buren
Lflv aPand. CO 80537
Ser ic.
3
0
0
0
0
3
C00180000044
U. S. Post.aJ Services
1501. Wynk000 St.
Denver. CO 80201
3
0
0
0
0
3
W1736001O329
VA Medical Canter
Fort 40
Sh.riCan. WY 82801
0
0
0
2
1
3
C01890090003
Western Arai Power
KrtNIlng Lrn.s SC
13 MIles Soutfl on I$uy 9
Krehnq, CO 80435
3
0
0
0
0
3
L Act7 .LIL or prupoa.d c.ncraL&z.d ? aztr oui nice stor.g. faC 1Lt9 at thu Locacuon (Oet.nJ. Property D ipoia1 S.rvic.)
2 o C oen ict V1ty Ln thu.s cat.qory

-------
Facility I s
Locatlonl
oCk Nountain Arsenal
North ol St 1ston Airport
Corce City, CO 80022
Pueblo Oscot Activity - U S. Arley
75.i. NE of Hwy SO
Pueblo, CO 31002
Ft. Carson
OFAE. Bldg. 304, AFZC
Fort Carson, CO 80913
U S. DOE, Rocky Flats Punt
16 •i Pf 1 of Denver
Golden, CO 80402
USA. Fltzsiaons Ar.y Ned cal Cant.r
ColPax and PIQrTI
Aurora, CO 80045
Pitirion Air Force Base
LatJLong 38-48-36/I.
Coloraoo Springs, CO 8091.4
L owry Air Force Bail
6th and Quebec, *3415
Oenver, CO 30230
O.nver Federal Center
6th and Aipling
Oenver, CO 80225
(Fl1WA Central Direct Fed Div Nat
(Federal SupOly Facility)
U S Bureau of Reclamation
Leadville Dr Tuflfl 1, 2 iii E of Lead ’ville
Leadville, CO 80461
USAF Academy
10 ii N of Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs, CD 80907
Solar Energy R.searcn Institute
161.7 Cola Blvd.
Golden, CO 80401
Buckley Air Matlonil Base
Buckley Ang Bass
Aurora, CD 80011
National Center or At ospharic Research
1850 Tibls Nesa Or
Boulder, CD 83303
National Bureau of Stindards
325 Broadway
Boulder, CO 80303
Wsst*rn Ant Power A i n
Brush Field Branch
11532 y. 11.
Bruit ,, CO 80723
Westarn Area Power Adei ii , Power Oper
1800 South Rio Grtnds
liontrose, CO 81401
Anvil Points Gil Shale Facility
8 ii west of Rifle
Rifle, CO 81650
U S. PostAl Services
1501 Wynkoop St.
Denver, CO 80201
Tale 3
FACILITY MTINGS
(By Location)
lazardeul Sita Point
waste Cont - Wastewater
Msnagsnt thation Olschargu
131 8 4
9 7 2
7% 6 4
3 5 3
3 5 1
3 6 0
3 6 0
31 5 0
PCS/PS sticlde Point
Storage Air
and Us. Esissions Rating
3 o 28
2 2 22
2 1 20
2 1 14
2 1 12
2 1 12
2 1 12
2 0 10
EPA
10
1 10.
CO521 002 0769
C 08213820725
C02213020L50
CO 7890010526
C0821162 0333
C0221002 0333
C09571924191
CD 157 1524 130
C 064 70000500
(C04.690090010)
(C09470090 01 1)
C0214Z3 06966
C08572924928
C 04890000 017
C0957 0 025644
C03490016 042
C091315 0517 5
C088900900 06
C 0989 0090 00 5
C 0989003 1876
C 0 0180000044
0
5
5
0
0
10
3
0
1
2
2
8
3
5
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
2
1
7
3
0
0
2
0
5
3
0
0
2
0
5
3
0
0
2
0
5
4
0
0
0
0
4
3
1
0
0
0
4
3
0
3
0
0
3

-------
tibls 3 (Cont.)
FACILITY RATINGS 15
(By Location)
EPA Ficility fl 4aZsrdous Sit. Point PC3/Pt$ti de Point
waste Cont — Wa.t.watsr Storage Air
NO. Add ss Msn19u fit inetion Olscnsrges ana usa EI,iSSIOnS Rating
C01890090003 Wsstap’n 3 0 0 0 0 3
krallnq Line. SC
13 Mfles South on wy 9
Krlling, CD 80435
C05245153411 . U.S. 3uraai of Recleestion 3 0 0 0 0 3
Watir and Poiier Resources Services
910 Van Buren
Loveland. CD 80537
VMTAIA
MT8571924555 Malnitroa 03 31 s o 2 2 13
Facility 1501 P.rim.
Mal. .tro. AFB, MT 59402
NORTH DAKOTA
M04Sfl924758 Mlriot Air Force 8ase jØI 6 1 2 1 20
Facility 1982
Minot AFO. NO 58101
N03571924759 Grand Forts Air For Base 4 6 3 2 2 Li
5 ci E or main gate
Grand Forks 08. M D 58201
N09210022779 Concrete M1 si1s Early Warning Station 3 5 0 2 0 10
Oat 157 AD/Of
Concrete, ND 58221
M0 097 15298 07 DFSP GrenO Forts 3 5 2 0 a 10
(N00971528.8)6) Grand Forts AFB, 42 N
Grand Forks, NO 58201
(US 0 0 0-OLA)
• ‘ D5I20514667 Metabolism an Radiation Laboratory 3 5 0 0 0 3
1504 College Street
Fargo, NO 58105
SOUTH DAKOTA
S02 571924644 Ellswortn Air F rc. Base 6 4 2 1 [ 9
44 CSG/SAC
Ellsworth 09, SD 51706
506140000021 USGS - EROS Data Center 0 5 4 0 0
1000 Pecora Way
Garretson, SO 57030
506640090035 IVA Silver king Mines, Inc. 3 5 0 0 0 8
U S r4igiiway LB
Edg ont. SD 57735
S02360010282 Hot Springs A Hospital 0 5 0 2 1. 8
5th St. • S . C. 1317S—R
Hat Springs, SD 57747
501890090029 starn Area Power A in , 3 5 0 0 0 8
Watertown SuD.
I •1. E of I29
Watertown, SD 57201
UTAH
U1057 1724350 Hill Air Force Bass 10 9 4 2 2 27
2349 AFB/DEEX
141)1 00, UT 34056
U15210090002 Toosle Army Depot 11’ 3 0 2 2 23
State HIghway 36
boi l., UT 84074

-------
Tab). 3 (Cont.) 16
FACILITY AT1NGS
(By Location)
EPA Facility IazardOul Site Point PCB/Pelticid. Point
tO &tioiiJ last. Cont.- Wist.wst.r Storage Mr Total
A44pu Maniqesent natIon Discharges and Use Esissions Rating
J10570090001 Utai lest & Trelninq Binge 13 5 0 2 0 20
5 ci lii SE of WeMover. UT 84056
Watertown. 50 57201
U19210020922 Defense Oe ot Ogden 3 6 0 0 1
(uT7971549855) 500 West 12th Street
Ogaen, UT 84407
(US000OLA)
uT37S02112 59 Ougway Provthg Crounds 3 1 0 2 1 7
45 ci I of 10011.
Ougway, UT 84022
UT8570025561 Little Mountain Test Annex 0 5 0 2 0 7
900 5 10800 I
Ogden, uT 84404
WYOMING
,(Y5571924179 Warren AF8 3 1 1 2 2
Cheyenne. WY 82001
1Y 1890033 .874 western Bis.ar n Institute/U’WYRC 3 5 0 0 0 3
imi M n US
Laracia. WY 82070
WY2890031873 Western Re earcfl tr stitute UWYRC 3 5 0 0 0 8
9th arid Lewis Streets
Laraels, WY 82071
i13890090001. Western Area Power A in 3 5 0 0 0 8
Casoer Field Br
West of Mt View on
Mills, W Y 82644
wY7360010329 VA Medical Center 0 0 0 2 1 3
Fart RD
Sheridan, NY 82801
L ActtLal or propos..d c.ncra1 ud huardeus rusti oraq. faci.L j c c this £ocac on (D.f.nz. Prop.r’V Oz,pcsal S.r?zc•)
2 No imocn acc vzty ui this cac.gor’j

-------