October 1990 Oregon User Charge Study ------- Introduction PurDose of the Survey Part of the State’s ongoing responsibility is to acquire financial and technical information about its communities. The information acquired from this user charge survey allows the State to monitor the ability of its communities to achieve financial self-sufficiency for wastewater treat- ment operations. There is an especially strong need for the State to look even more closely at user charges since local municipalities will be financing their future wastewater construction without the assistance of federal grants. The future success of wastewater pollution control in the State will depend on the ability of local communities to maintain financially self-suffi- cient wastewater treatment operations. Do communities have healthy t ser charge systems that provide adequate revenues to support operations and debt repayment? To answer this question and plan for the future, State and local officials must know where communities stand in running self-sufficient wastewater systems. To obtain information on the financial solvency of its communities, the State of Oregon under- took a survey of user charges following the procedures given in the United States Envuon- mental Protection Agency’s publication Looking at User Charges: A State Survey and Report (EPA 430i09-87-0008). The survey’s 11 ques- tions, although deceptively simple, generate a wealth of information on residential unit costs. A copy of the survey form is provided in Appen- dix A. This survey was conducted during May of 1990. Responses on demographic and utility character- istics were used to calculate unit costs and flows, examine economic impact and ensure valid comparisons between communities. Costs data provided the basis for comparing user charge systems and the costs of operation, maintenance, replacement and capitalization. Revenue ques- lions allow the examination of whether the systems were recovering enough money to operate in the black Not all respondents answered all the survey questions. This resulted in different sample sizes being used for the various analyses Organization of ReDort This report is divided into eight sections to evaluate the financial self-sufficiency of munici- pal wastewater treatment operations. I. Covering the Costs of Operation 11. Unit Costs by Treatment Level 1111. Average Annual Total Residential Costs and Sewer Service Charges per Household IV. Equitability of Residential User Charges V Ability of Residential Sector to Cover Residential Costs VI. Planning for Equipment Replacement VU. Debt Burden Without Grant Contribution VIII Summary Findings A summary table of each community’s responses to the survey is presented in Appendix B I. Covering the Costs of Operation The most basic question is “Are sewer service charges adequate to cover the costs of operation and to achieve clean water goals?” This analysis shows the ratio of revenues to costs. For com- munities where revenues are not adequate to cover costs, i.e., the ratio is below 100%, the communities should reassess their user charge systems and other sources of revenues to ensure proper funding. In this analysis. 42% of the communities showed revenues below their costs. These communities had an average overall revenue shortfall of 25% ------- RATIO OF REVENUES TO COSTS 4.3, 33 33, :3 .3 Is, 5 I) . 3, 3 DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL REVENUES TO TOTAL COSTS TREATMENT NO. OF ABOVE BELOW LEVEL COMMUN. 100% 100% SECONDARY 66 59% 31% ADVANCED 5 40% 60% OVERALL 71 58% 42% (Note: Only one system reported using primary treatment. To preserve data confidentiality for that system, this report shows treatment level analyses for secondary and advanced treatment systems only.) II. Unit Costs by Treatment Level Analysis of unit costs (cost of treatment per 1000 gallons) helps identify communities where costs are usually high or low. Unit costs for individual communities vary dramatically and the analysis reflects this fact. Communities with secondary treatment averaged $2.24 per 1000 gallons, and advanced treatment systems averaged $1.88 per 1000 gallons. The unit wastewater treatment costs averaged $2.22 per 1000 gallons. Operation, maintenance, and equipment replacement costs averaged $1.66 per 1000 gallons. I 6 - 35.’ : 25 1 I to Si. TOTAL COSTS OM&R COSTS SIN- $I.9 sz.oo- i ’ 3 ,QQ. $39 31IIvs p0? I CX G111c Tress TOTAL COSTS BY TREATMENT LEVEL 55 125 !zo Iii ___ ‘3 ‘S I $0 ‘11.00 SIX- $1.99 $2.00- $2.39 $3.00- $399 ‘$399 OsIkn put I,C00 3111311 Irislsi [ 1 $11s TrIslml0 OA saslTrss4.,.u OM&R COSTS BY TREATMENT LEVEL 4% — 4” 3$ •1 °T 2$. 20. $5. S to— $ 00 5 1.00-51.90 $2.03- $259 $303- $359 ‘$559 Os$tsn r I ,00ThIIxs Tr oil 40% X%.74* 73%-99% i00*-’ZS% 125$ Isl$ R..s* a. Cab(S) 41.00 $1.00. $9.90 $2.00- $2.99 $3 GO- $339 ‘$3 9 ).IIars sr I,3Q0GulI.. Tr,,t.g J I Tre,twu. 3 t4aa 1ris$U s ------- AVERAc UNiT COSTS BY TREAT7I4LNT LEVEL AVER AVER TOTAL UNfl COSTS TREAT b r NO. OP OM&R CAPITAL STO - LEVEL COt.Th .JN COSTS COST AVER MEDIAN 0EV 4 SECONDARY 66 $1.67 $0.37 $2.24 $1.63 $2.72 • 40 + ADVANCED 5 5142 $0.46 11.10 32.00 $1.11 OVERALL 71 $166 $056 $2.22 $1.39 32.6* . 3 IS 30 25 — Ill. Average Annual Total Residential Costs and Sewer Service Charges per Household The average annual total residential treatment costs and sewer service charges per household serves as a basis for later analyses such as (1) the percentage it represents of median household income, and (2) whether user charges are cover- ing actual costs. Here, the data has been arrayed to show the distribution by treatment levels. The seconciary treatment residential costs were concentrated in the $50 to $150 range, while advanced treatment costs were in the $101 to $150 range. User charges for both treatment levels fell in the same ranges as did residential costs. The average residential treatment cost was $146 per household per year while the average residential user fee was $127 per house- hold per year. AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL COST PER HOUSEHOLD I I AVERAGE ANNUAL CHARGE PER HOUSEHOLD 20 $3... $0 Si. $30 $50- $100 $101 . $150 $151. $200 $201 . $233 $230 *wn s .ss C$.rp r I N ($) AVERAGE ANNUAL CHARGE PER HOUSEHOLD Co ‘C I 1 7° 13 ‘0. so. I 20 IC .130 150-1100 $I0I• $110 $111• $200 $201. $230 — Is, Is s Cs) I1. 1tmd00sl O .s..wrv.ss .r .s AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL COST PER HOUSEHOLD • 0 50 4 ‘ i IL L ,1i .i __ . 050 $15 .$ 00 liii. $150 till- $200 1101 . izio 5:13 W4 IUI C a.. . . sal4 (1) T.00.d$ C iISlU Is DISTRiBUTiON OF RESIDENTiAL COST! AND USER (3 IAMGES AVE TOTAL AVERAGE CluE C I IAEGI 11RAThIENT uN RES PEE I ICC$E IIOLD LEVEL SAItW$1 COST/lift AVERAGE MEDIA.’. $10 EV SECONDARY 66 1146.91 3127.26 $120.00 S 57.73 ADVANCED 5 $137.12 $121.12 3132.00 S 02.59 . 12*0 OVERALL 7$ $146.21 $127.37 3120.00 155.73 ------- IV. 3!IThT 1U1 TTâ : ? r r Ttnhs D Are residential customers paying their fair share of the costs? Or is one class of users subsidizing another? Analysis of data on the portion f the flow, costs, and revenues attributable to residen- tial users allows answers to these questions. Based on the analysis, communities may restruc- ture their user charge systems to d.istribute costs more equitably. This analysis shows that in many communities residential users (48%) may be paying less than their share of treatment costs. For communities utilizing secondary treatment, about 47% of communities charge residential customers less than their estimated share of treatment costs; for advanced treatment, this figure is 60%. RATIO OF REVENUES TO COSTS: RESIDENTIAL 25 ? 1; I0 IT_ ‘!I_ ,i 1 1I i.t . ii$ .7$ tOSs- ZS* I2 *.ISI .ISI ( R I S a RATIO OF REVENUES TO COSTS: RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NO. OF ABOVE BELOW COMMUN. 100% 100% 53% 47% 66 AI5VANCED 5 40% 60% 71 52% 48% V. Ability of Residential Sector to Cover Residential Costs Average cost per household as a percentage of median household income can be used to indi- cate whether the cost of wastewater treatment is becoming burdensome for community residents. Data can also be used to predict the ability of the community to generate more revenue by increas- ing its sewer service charges. In this analysis, communities had an average total residential treatment cost which was 0.8% of the MN.!, but their average sewer service charge was 0.7% of the MHI. TOT RESIDENTIAL COST PER HH AS % OF MHI 35 125 J g I (0 DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL REVENUE VS. TOTAL COSTS FOI RESIDENTIAL SECTOR TREATMENT LEVELS SECONDARY IS .3% %- 751 7*2-5*2 lOll- $255 1231 - 501 (25* 251.45% 501-55% 1.Q0%-I 01 .150* TIP C ps- iN R 1,1MM I Qvr ------- TOT RESIDENTIAL COSTS PER HH AS% OF MIII ‘4 I I I Tr l SEWER SERVICE CHARGE AS % OF MHI 50 0• SEWER SERVICE CHARGE AS % OF MHI I I ZS1 II.A* jIS. 5 130S .1S4% ‘I.S0 iie ABILiTY OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR TO COVER RESIDENTIAL COSTS COST PER HOUSEHOLD ASS OF MII I Sm 70 S0 so *0 so 20 I0 TREAtMENT NO. OF LEVEL COMMUN AVER MEDIAN DEV SECONDARY 66 ADVANCED 5 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.3 ABILiTY OF RES [ DEYI1AL SECTOR TO COVER RESIDEYI1AL COSTS SEWER SERVICE C I LARGE AS S OF MIII TREATM 4T NO. OF STI) LEVEL COMMUN AVER MEDIAN DEV SECONDARY 67 0.7 0.6 0.4 ADVANCED 5 0.7 0.7 0.2 TOTAL 72 0.7 0.6 0.4 V!. Planning For Equipment Replacement Examination of how communities are planning for future equipment replacement identifies those communities that may need to reassess their user charge systems. Communities may be shorten- ing the life expectancy of their facilities and possibly be causing future compliance problems by not pmvidL g adequate funds for equipment replacement. This analysis shows that communities with replacement funds set aside 11% of their operat- ing costs for equipment replacement. FUNDS FOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT I I so *0 50 13 ZOO ZOO- 1 000- *fl 100*. ‘50* ‘1500 1* 0 1 w ‘I. * P l O l0 I ; ‘20* 250 -01 01-50* 1001-iSOl * P01 50- SIV T,UIS.MS D01p,i? Ps .mm , 10450 $00- 1050 lO S. 5 % hr tcuoi ’1 ,,Iw.O (1 0 11 1) TOTAL 71 0.8 0.6 0.5 ------- ADJUSTED COST OF DEBT 73 .3 81% IOi 11% 7% 41.0$ ltX $1.,, s.x• u. $3.20 139$ s IIn $1? I .XC N frialed U $scs Tr0$ms 0 a I I VII. Debt Burden Without Grant Contribu- The effect of grant funding on capital costs was examined by making adjustments to the debt financing cost figure (as reported in the surveys) to reflect “total” costs of capital without Federal or State grant assistance. This roughly deter- mined the impact of grant assistance on commu- nity ueatment costs. This analysis showed that the average debt financing costs for advanced ueatment would have increased from $.49 to $2.74 per 1000 gallons, while it would have increased from $.60 to $2.58 for secondary treatment. In this analy- sis, grants reduced the average total treatment costs from $4.25 per 1000 gallons to $2.22 or 48%. I I ADJUSTED TOTAL COST I • 0 AVG ADJUSTED DEBT BY TREATMENT LEVEL DEV AVEL GI ADJUSTTD COSTS P0* GP.A r COWTRIBUT)ON IY TREAThIENT LEVEL AVOOMéR AVG ADJ AVG ADJ COST DIT COST TOT COST mEAm rr NO. o p * 1000 P0*1000 LEVEL COMMUN GALLOM GALLONS GALLONS D1AS SECONDARY 65 3147 32.5$ $4.25 $2.03 SMS ADVANCE D 5 31.42 32.74 54.16 33.44 33.21 TOTAL 70 31.66 32.5$ $4.23 32.15 3627 0 . sa 30. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUNDS TOTAL NO. OF COMMUNITIES PERCENT OF COMMUNITIES WITH EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUNDS AVERAGE PERCENT VALUE OF REPLACEMENT FUNDS MEDIAN VALUE I 41.00 $1.00. $1 00 $Z.00• $2.t$ $3.00- $499 $1.00 Os llsnosr .000GNI. trWlII I L 3 39 0 j I c_to. . ------- VIII. Summary Findings Some of the more interesting findings from this survey were: 1. Forty-two (42%) percent of the commu- nities are not collecting enough wastewater revenues to meet their total expenses. 2. The averag: wastewater revenue shortfall for the deficient communities was 25 percent of their total treatment costs. 3. The unit wastewater treatment costs averaged 2.22 dollars per 1,000 gallons. Opera- tion, maintenance, and equipment replacement averaged 1.66 dollars per 1,000 gallons. 4. The average residential treatment cost was 146 dollars per household per year while the average residential user fee was 127 dollars per household per year. 5. The average sewer service charge was 0.7% of the median household income (MI-il), however, the total residential treatment cost was 0 8% of the MI-il. 6. Forty-eight (48%) percent of the residen- tial users appear to be paying less than their appropnate share of the total costs. 7. Eighty-one (81%) percent of the cornmu- nities have equipment replacement funds with an average value of 11% of operating funds. 8. Federal and State grants have reduced the average total cost of wastewater treatment by 48% for secondary and advanced treatment systems. ------- Appendix A Model Survey Form ------- Dear (State Name) Community Official, 4i, The budget problems you’ve faced in paying for community services will probably increase in the future. This means your local residents and industry must pay more for wastewater treatment. Your challenge will be how to raise money to meet your current and future wastewater treatment needs. The information requested in the attached survey can help you meet this challenge. STRIKING A BALANCE As you know, every costs and revenues to will help you decide operating, maintaining, community needs to continuously examine make certain they balance. The results if your current service charges are and improving your wastewater treatment its wastewater of this survey adequate for facil ities. HOW DO YOU COMPARE? The information you and others provide will be analyzed to show how much communities in the state pay for wastewater service. You’ll be able to compare your community’s costs with others. If you return this survey to us, we’ll send you a copy of the survey analysis report. 00 YOU HAVE QUESTIONS? Instructions are attached to help you answer the survey questions. To answer some of the questions, you may need to involve various people in your organization who know about the special aspects of your wastewater system. Even if you or others don’t know the exact answers to all the questions, please use your best estimates and return the survey to us by (date). Please feel free to call (name of contact ) at ( telephone number) if you have any questions. The survey should be returned to ( name of contact and address) . Thank you or ydur help. ttachment Si ncerely, ( Name of Official) Al ------- Con nunity Name Wastewater Service District (If your community does not treat its wastewater) ___________________ Contact Person(s) _____________________________________________ Address Phone No. — 1. How marty households (not population) in your community receive wastewater treatment Services? _____________ 2. What is the current estimated median household income in your community? $ 3. What is the current average flow treated at your facility? _____________ Gallons per day 4. What is your current estimated average wastewater flow per household per day? _____________ Gallons per day 5. What Is the level of treatment at your wastewater treatment facility? — primary — secondary — advanced A2 ------- 6. about how much of the money needed to construct your fac lity came from state or federal grants? $_________________ 7. How much does it cost to operate your facilities for a year? (operation, maintenance, and equipment replacement costs -- 00 NOT rnclude the costs of wastewater loans and bonds, or depreciation) S_____________ Year of data 8. About how much money are you putting aside (as a percentage of operating costs) each year for equipment replacement? 7. 9. How much are you paying each year to cover wastewater loans or bonds? (principal and interest costs only) S____________ Year of data 10. How much money (revenue) are you currently collecting to pay for wastewater collection, treatment and disposal, plus principal and interest costs on wastewater debt? $____________ Year of data 11. What Is the current average annual sewer service charge per household? $ Year of data A3 ------- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SURVEY These Instructions include information plus directions to help you complete some of the questions. If something does not fityour situation, answer as best as you can and explain the problem or call the number shown in the cover letter for more help. QUESTIONS 1-6 There are several possible sources of information to complete QuestIons 1-6. Use the most current source that corresponds best to your wastewater facility’s service area. Sources for data include the census, surveys conducted by a regional planning agency, etc. In all cases, provide the best information you have; give us your best estimate if actual numbers are not available. — 1. Households. This should be the total number of households (residential customers) serviced, not the number of people or population. (Residential apartment buildings should be treated as equivalent dwelling units.) 2. Median Household Income. This should be the most recent census value or current estimate. Your local Bureau of Census, Data User Center, can provide this information. 3. Current Average Flow Treated. This value represents flow from all sources. Flow should be reported in gallons per day. If your flow is calculated in cubic feet per day, multiply the flow by 7.481 to convert it to gallons per day. 4. Average Wastewater Flow Per Household Per Day. Calculate as follows: gallons daily number of residential daily flow per household residential flow T customers (gallons per day) Your figure for gallons daily residential wastewater flow might come from your water supply department or your billing office. The wastewater flow figure should include an adjustment for infiltration/inflow. QUESTIONS 7-11 Cost and revenue information you provide in Questions 7-11 should Include all parts of the wastewater system: collection (sewers, pumping stations), the treatment plant, arid disposal (outfalls, sludge disposal). 7. Annual Costs. This number should include annual “operating costs,” “maintenance costs,” “replaceiient costs” for wastewater collection and treatment, and any charges from Regional systems. (ItDOESNOT include the costs of stewater loans and bonds, or depr?clation). A4 ------- Ooerating costs include labor, materials and supplies, utilities, and overhead (such as office rent). Maintenance costs include preventive and corrective maintenance. Reolacernent costs include costs to maintain but not to extend the useful life of the facilities (like pumos and motors). 8. Equipment Replacement. This question is intended to determine wh?t percentage of the operating costs you included in Question 7 are being .ut aside to maintain but not extend the useful life of the facilities (like pumps and motors). 9. Costs of Loans or Bonds. This number should include all principal and interest payments you are making annually to pay for your wastewater treatment facilities. 10. Money (Revenues) Collected Annually. This should Include all the money you collect for operating and financing all parts of the wastewater facilities--collection, treatment, disposal and debt service. DO NOT Include grant monies. 11. Annual Sewer Service Charge Per Household. This should be an estimate of the typical total annual sewer service bill for a residential customer. One method of calculating this charge would be to use the wastewater treatment rate established in your sewer use ordinance and the average wastewater flow per household. A5 ------- Appendix B Formulas and Data ------- Rano of Revenues to Costs = Total Re enue (10 ’ )! lO\l ’ R Cusis i7i — Debt Financine Costs (9)1 2 Toutl Unit Costs per 1000 Gallons = I OM&P Costs (7) + Debt Fitiaiic in CO”t’ 0’) I l0(’ ) Current As er.ige rioss ) 3 OM&R Cost per 10(R) Gallons PnoLe ed = (OM& R Costs 7 ’ )/ I Ciinn cnn -\ en Floss (3) 3651) 1000 4 Average .Annual Cliaree per Hoii ehultl = Current Average Annual Sessen Sets e Charge (II) 5 Avera e Residential Cost per Household = Residential Flow Proportion IO\1 R Costs (7’) + Debt Financiniz Costs (9 ’ )l \tiniher 0) 1-louseholds 1 1) Where Residential Flow Propontion = Flow / Hpiis hpld (4) Number ot Households (I ) Current As’eran.te Flo s i ) 6 Ratio of Revenues to Costs Residential = [ Number of Hous hplds (I Averai e Annual Sewer Charge (11)1 Cost of Treating Residential Flow \Vhere Cost oF Treating Residential F’oss = [ OM&R Costs (7) - - Debt FinanLilig Costs 9I Residential Flow Proportion 7 Total Residential Cost per Household .Is a Pei ent OF \‘lHL = Average Residential Cost per I-Iu1l ch0lL1 / -\s erage \4}-il (2) 8 Sewer Service Charge as a Per cut oF \II II = Current Average Annual Sesser Sers e Charge (11)! Average M I - Il (2) 9 Equipment Replacement Funding = Equipment Replacement as PenLent 01 O\l&R (8) 10 A nnual Debt Fi mincing Cost -\d u t mciii = Total Grant Dollars 6 Capital Cosi RCLOS er Factor Where the Capital Cost Recovec v FJL ton t .issiinied ii) he 0 02. representing the equivalent annual COSt oF borrowing the grant tuncling o en 2() ‘ ears at percent interest per year Note that in computing these measun es. ans s s fl1 ‘ ‘ . h ‘ as missing one or more parts oF the data was excluded From the caft uLitnon. hus sainpiL l/es ii Ft om measure to measure ------- SUMMARY CHART OF USER COSTS SURVEY INFORMATION Community Average Level 01 Treatment Operation Debt Financing Total CosI Average Annual lotal Hes Cost lolal Residential Number Flow (GPD) Cosis Costs per Year $11000 Gal Service Charge per Household Cost as °!.. ol MHI per Household I 5.000.000 secondary $1928900 $330,000 $1 24 $12200 $7680 029°!.. 2 2.100.000 secondary $510000 $0 $067 $9000 $5343 027°!.. 3 203.000 secondary $30157 $14,850 $061 $13200 $8314 044°! . . 4 1.590.000 secondary $121481 $0 $021 $48 00 $28 27 0 13% 5 280,000 secondary $198,000 $0 $194 $13600 $10607 060°!.. 6 9,120 secondary $24,933 $9210 $1026 $9780 $22463 I 48% 7 292 000 secondary $61,000 $20330 $076 $13800 $9748 0 55°! .. 8 16,900 secondary $88485 $30610 $1931 $15600 $24256 I 36% 9 140.000 secondary $67,945 $14,862 $1 62 $9600 $19460 I 29% 10 2300.000 secondary $1,019,064 $794,066 $216 $24500 $14584 0 53°!.. Ii 9.000,000 secondary $1,666,212 $728,938 $073 $11000 $10831 0 i2% 12 1.250,000 secondary $368,050 $27,933 $087 $12000 $10042 056°!.. 13 80,000 secondary $81,266 $11,206 $317 $9000 $12599 078°!.. I 4 20,000 secondary $32,000 $9,242 $5 65 $144 00 $257 76 I 36°!.. I S 200,000 advanced $170,200 $0 $233 $12200 $12765 075°f.. 16 54000 secondary $28,470 $0 $144 $8400 $10017 066°!.. 1 7 480.000 secondary $82,091 $0 $0 47 $84 00 $42 76 024°!.. 18 120,000 secondary $19,000 $14,500 $076 $10800 $13484 089% 19 53,000 advanced $42,388 $28,601 $367 $13200 $22636 126°!.. 20 109.000 secondary $130,945 $55,500 $4 69 $19200 $290 79 I 66% 21 300,000 secondary $125,840 $6,662 $121 $12000 $7332 037% 22 340 630 secondary $245,759 $101,067 $279 $18000 $19631 I 12°!.. 23 8.000.000 secondary $3,913,500 $1,004,000 $168 $14772 $14138 0 46°!.. 24 100,1 20 secondary $37,300 $56,900 $2 58 $90 00 $225 81 I 25° !.. 25 220 000 secondary $61,960 $18000 26 1,027,000 secondary $444,791 $211,737 $175 $13200 $15215 078° !.. 27 60 000 secondary $25,537 $12,950 $1 76 $14820 $10776 064% 28 70,000 secondary $19,000 $52,000 $2 78 $247 00 $225 37 1 46% 29 198,000 secondary $160.398 $10.900 $237 $12900 $20897 137% 30 3.250,000 secondary $875,778 $0 $074 $9420 $6036 022% 3 1 1,800,000 advanced $284,085 $93,000 $0 57 $142 20 $84 84 0 29% 32 600.000 secondary $70,000 $0 $032 $4800 $3745 025% 33 100,000 advanced $614,348 $188,626 $200 $13992 $12337 099% 34 93,312 secondary $23,035 $3,300 $077 $7500 $7620 061% 35 95,000 secondary $32,919 $14,105 $136 $13200 $11880 064% 36 2.650,000 secondary $1,400,000 $0 $145 $10200 $17751 0 71°!.. 37 14,200,000 secondary $1,799,910 $673,270 $048 $7600 $3971 026% 38 65,000 secondary $24.1 IS $5,500 $1 25 $6000 $12302 1 02% 39 20,000 secondary $15,202 $6,760 $301 $14400 $15703 109% ------- SUMMARY Cl IART OF USER COSTS SURVEY INFORMATKDN Community Average Level 01 Treatment Operation Debt Financing Total Cost Average Annual Total Res Cost Toi,jl Residential Number Flow (GPO) Costs Costs per Year $11000 Gal Service Charge per Household Cost as % c i MHI per Household 40 150.000 secondary $131,000 $53000 $336 $10800 $21467 107% 4 1 1.800.000 secondary $582000 $726,000 $1 99 $192 00 $218 00 0 90% 42 712.000 advanced $166,921 $5 1 .765 $084 $10800 $12286 052% 43 2,500,000 secondary $600,000 $90,000 $0 76 $156 00 $63 48 0 23% 44 421,000 secondary $132,237 $0 $085 $9000 $7030 042% 45 165,300 secondary $81,601 $104,765 $309 $12000 $25255 173% 46 123.071 secondary $103,634 $115,000 $487 $10500 $26825 102% 47 25.000 secondary $11,000 $5,515 $181 $3600 $10570 062% 48 48,000 secondary $35,000 $0 $200 - $108 00 $218 75 088% 49 398,000 secondary $186.91 I $82,816 $1 86 $15567 $75 23 0 48% 50 250.000 secondary $57,250 $0 $063 $7200 $6870 046% 51 78.000,000 secondary $26,100,000 $3,200,000 $101 $12060 $78 13 033°!., 52 123,000 secondary $81,160 $19,207 $224 $16800 $28560 I 39% 53 21.000 secondary $22,100 $7,000 $380 $9000 $221 71 123% 54 29,900.000 secondary $7,511,800 $528,700 $074 $14280 $14521 054% 55 540.000 secondary $226,433 $50,837 $141 $9000 $14890 056% 56 73.500 secondary $59,150 $21,240 $300 $30100 $27344 227% 57 1,020,000 secondary $411,401 $264,712 $182 $10200 $9280 047% 58 683,000 secondary $180,121 $11,180 $077 $12000 $9299 049% 59 2,000 secondary $5,716 $0 $783 $40000 $38107 272% 60 2,540,000 secondary $360,000 $0 $039 $96 00 $35 43 0 12% -61 120.000 secondary $90427 $0 $206 $13200 $12584 043% 62 1500,000 secondary $340,000 $30,758 $068 $120 00 $64 26 049% 63 817,833 secondary $267,848 $85,191 $1 18 $13800 $18001 090% 64 2,400,000 secondary $397,295 $0 $045 $7320 $6506 056% 65 5,820,000 secondary $1,854,572 $5,886,169 $364 $14500 $37241 100% 66 75,000 secondary $24,542 $9,220 $123 $18000 $25074 084% 67 220.000 secondary $159,258 $101,779 $325 $12000 $201 71 1 10% 68 500,000 SeCondary $84,800 $3,551 $0 48 $120 00 $49 48 0 26% 69 30,000 secondary $18,000 $0 $164 $9000 $7500 042% 70 75,000 secondary $38,000 $0 $1 39 $90 00 $76 00 043% 71 650.000 secondary $497.700 $168,000 $281 $9264 $20483 t08% 72 94.734 secondary $69,098 $4,215 $212 $20700 $18960 093% AVERAGE $222 $12737 $14628 08% MEDIAN $139 $12000 $12461 06% ------- |