U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
BANKHEAD LAKE AND HOLT LXK AND DAF1
WALKER AND TUSCALOOSA COUNTIES
ALABAm
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 226
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
BANKHEAD LAKE AND HOLT LOCK AND DAM
WALKER AND TUSCALOOSA COUNTIES
ALABAMA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 226
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
ALABAMA WATER IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
AND THE
ALABAMA NATIONAL GUARD
JULY 1976
-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Study Lakes - Alabama IV
Lake and Drainage Area Map -
Sections
I. Conclusions
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 8
IV. Nutrient Loadings 15
V. Literature Revie d 24
VI. Appendices 25
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservol r.s.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report Is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
plannin9 [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Alabama Water Improvement
Commission for professional involvement and to the Alabama National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey.
E. John Williford, Chief, Surveillance and Monitoring Section;
and John C. Chitwood, Biologist, Surveillance and Monitoring Section;
and Sam L. Coleman, Water Quality Planning Section; and M. H. Floyd,
Engineer, Surveillance and Monitoring Section; and Truman Green,
Engineer, Municipal Waste Control Section; and Tim McCartha, Biologist,
Surveillance and Monitoring Section; and James E. Mclndoe, Engineer,
Water Quality Planning Section; and Richard T. Maddox, Engineer,
Industrial Waste Control Section; and James 1. White, Engineer,
Municipal Waste Control Section provided invaluable lake docu-
mentation and counsel during the course of the Survey.
Major General Charles A. Rollo, Adjutant General of Alabama,
and Project Officer Lt. Col. Wash B. Ray, who directed the volun-
teer efforts of the Alabama National Guardsmen, are also gratefully
acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF ALABAMA
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Bankhead Walker
Gantt Covington
Guntersville Marshall, Johnson
Holt Lock and Dam Tuscaloosa
Lay Chilton, Coosa
Martin Elmore, Tallapoosa
Mitchell Coosa, Chilton
Pickwick Colbert, Lauderdale
(Tishomingo in MS
and Hardin in TN)
Purdy Jefferson, Shelby
Weiss Cherokee
Wilson Lauderdale, Colbert,
Lawrence
-------
Birmingham
BANKHEAD LAKE
® Tributary San 1ing Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
3 Drainage Area Boundary
-------
HOLT LOCK and DAM
® Tributary Sampling
x Lake Sampling Site
0 12 345
-t
Lock #13
(Halt Dam)
Map Location
-------
REPORT ON BANKHEAD LAKE AND HOLT LOCK AND DAM
STORET NUMBERS 0101 AND 0105
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Bankhead Lake and Holt Lock
and Dam are eutrophic (i.e., nutrient rich and highly pro-
ductive). Whether such nutrient enrichment is to be consi-
dered beneficial or deleterious is determined by its actual
or potential impact upon designated beneficial water uses
of each lake.
Of the 11 Alabama lakes sampled in 1973, only Holt Lock
and Darn had higher median inorganic nitrogen levels than
Bankhead Lake (Appendix E). In both impoundments, dissolved
oxygen concentrations were depressed and Secchi disc trans-
parencies were low. Pollution tolerant genera were predomi-
nant among the phytoplankton identified, although in low
concentrations probably due to toxic substances in the water
and short reservoir retention times (EPA, 1975). Survey
limnologists reported a continuous surface oil film at Molt
Lock and Dam, apparently generated by coal barges and barge
loading sites along the reservoir.
-------
2
Other studies (EPA, 1975) indicate that there are 18
municipal and 73 industrial waste sources discharging into
the Black Warrior River and its tributaries upstream from
Bankhead Lake. Excessive surface coal mining operations in
the Bankhead watershed contribute high concentrations of
zinc and manganese and lower the pH levels in both reservoirs.
The EPA report recommended the reduction of both industrial
and municipal waste loads into Bankhead Reservoir to improve
water quality and reduce potential for algal blooms.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that both Bankhead Lake
and Holt Lock and am were limited by available phosphorus
levels. Spikes of phosphorus, and nitrogen and phosphorus
simultaneously resulted in increases in assay yield. Addi-
tions of nitrogen alone did not stimulate a growth response.
The ratios of inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (NIP) in
sampled waters further suggest primary limitation by phos-
phorus in the reservoir.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources —
Nutrient loading to both Black Warrior River reser-
voirs was far higher than the eutrophic levels proposed
by Vollenweider (1975) for lakes with such volumes and
retention times. Loading to Bankhead Lake was approxi-
mately seven times the eutrophic loading, while the
-------
3
impoundment at Holt Lock and Dam was four times the
eutrophic level. However, Vollenweider’s model proba-
bly does not apply to water bodies with short hydraulic
retention times, and the mean hydraulic retention times
of Bankhead Lake and Holt Lock and Dam are only seven
and six days, respectively.
The mean annual phosphorus load from known point
sources was estimated to be 70.4% of the total reaching
Bankhead Lake. Of the point source load, the city of
Birmingham contributed a total of 50.4% from two waste-
water olants, and the city of Bessemer contributed 16.5%
While elimination of point source loading to the lake
would substantially reduce the overall load, nutrient
imput would still exceed Vollenweider’s eutrophic rate.
Concurrent control of nonpoint sources, through appli-
cation of proper land use practices and reduction of
presently unmeasured point sources (EPA, 1975) would be
required to upgrade water quality.
There are no known point sources directly impacting
Holt Lock and Dam. However, elimination of the point
sources impacting Bankhead Lake would be expected to
substantially improve water quality of Holt Lock and Dani.
-------
4
2. Nonpoint sources -
The Locust and Mulberry Forks of the Black Warrior
River were estimated to contribute 27.2% of the total
phosphorus load to Bankhead Lake, and the Black Warrior
River contributed 96.7% of the total to Holt Lock and
Dam. Additional sampling is needed to determine to
what degree these nonpoint background loads are over-
estimated due to unmeasured point sources, particularly
industrial, which impact the Black Warrior River.
-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface areas and mean depths were provided by the Alabama
Water Improvement Commission; maximum depths were estimated on
the basis of National Eutrophication Survey (NES) sampling data;
tributary data were provided by the Alabama District Office of
the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (outlet drainage areas include
the lake surface area). Mean hydraulic retention times were ob-
tained by dividing the lake volumes by mean flows of the outlets.
Precipitation values are estimated by methods as outlined in NES
Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is
included as Appendix A.
Holt Lock
A. Lake Morphometry: Bankhead Lake and Dam
1. Surface area: 37.23 13.36 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 3.1 7.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 21.3 23.8 meters.
4. Volume: 115.413 105.544 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic
retention time: 7 6 days
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet (See Appendix B for flow data):
1. Tributaries —
Name
A(l) Big Yellow Creek
B(l) Little Yellow Creek
C(l) Valley Creek
D(l) Locust Fork
(Black Warrior River)
E(l) Lost Creek
F(l) Mulberry Fork
(Black Warrior River)
Minor tributaries and
imediate drainage
Total
2. Outlet -
G(l) Black Warrior River
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock
and Dam
Drainage
area(kni 2 )
Mean flow
(m 3 /sec)
Name
Drainage
area(km )
Mean flow
(m 3 /sec)
38.1
0.20
A(l) Black Warrior River
10,334.1
179.30
40.2
0.21
B(l) Rocky Branch
5.4
0.09
647.5
12.55
C(l) Unnamed Stream
4.7
0.08
3,061.4
52.52
D(l) Peques Creek
29.0
0.47
888.4
5.16
E(l) Davis Creek
224.3
3.63
5,161.9
101.09
F(l) Blue Creek
96.9
2.73
460.0
8.05
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage
253.4
4.31
10,297.5
179.78
Total
10,947.8
191.11
10,334.1 178.63 A(2) Black Warrior River
10,960.9 191.39
-------
7
C. Precipitation:
Bankhead Holt Lock
Lake and Dam
1. Year of sampling: 167.9 170.8 cm.
2. Mean annual: 135.2 126.8 Cm.
-------
8
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Bankhead Lake and Holt Lock and Dam were sampled three times
during the open-water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped
Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical
parameters were collected from four stations on each lake and
from a number of depths at each station (see maps, pages v-vi).
During each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each
station for chlorophyll a analysis and phytoplankton identification
and enumeration. During the first visit, 18.9-liter depth-
integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum
depths sampled, expressed in meters, were:
Station Bankhead Lake _________ ______
_______ _____________ Nolt Lock and Dam
1 17.7 11.0
2 20.1 7.6
3 10.7 18.0
4 9.8 22.6
For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES Working
Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in Ill-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll a determinations are included in Ill-B. Results of the
limiting nutrient study are presented in Ill-C.
-------
1A IK .- ltA) LArE
sTo [ r CoDE (‘101
PHI’SLCAL 3111) C’ILMICAL c .1A13Ac1E lsrIcs
6/ .4/73
= ‘. UE 1s-i
NAOGt
8 HA,t,F MEI)IA’J (METE13S)
8/29/13
13 AA
= 4 L) PIri
.1 AN(,E
6 13ANoL MEIJ IAN (ME1E. S)
I 10/30/73
MAX
= ‘. OEPT6
N GE
.‘4 WAN(,E MEIJIAN (MEIEMSI
0 ‘40. OF SAMPLcS
TEP 8ATIJi E WE’. CENT)
0.—I. -, 1 uEPr
MAX )E ’. ’r13”
23.13— 25.8
16.8— 20.2
24.1
19.9
0.0— 0.0
9•M— 20.1
13
4
28.6— 30.7
21.3— 22.8
29.6
22.3
0.0— 1.,
13.2— 19.8
b
4
21.4— 29.9
21.4— 22.4
22.’.
22.0
0.0— 1.5
1.0— 16.8
DI&SOLVEO OArGEr. (Mo/LI
0.—I. ’, DEPTH I)
M OEPTr4 4
—°
3.6— 7.’
5.1
°°—*°
9.6— 2 ).I
4
4
5.2— 6.3
3.2— 4.1
‘
1.3
1.,— 1.5
b.2 19.8
2
4
1.6— 3.2
l.0 5.8
2.4
3.2
1.5— 1.5
7.0 16.8
C0WUCIIVIIY (04 ’IOS)
0.—I.5 ‘I ‘JEPT!•4 4
‘AX OEPti-,° 4
13o.— 155.
8j.— 120.
I213.
92.
0.0— 0.0
9.13- 20.1
13
1
69.— 2s2.
5.- 120.
1p2.
85.
0.0— 1.5
4.2— 19.6
6
4
ISO.— 224.
162.— 2213.
177.
200.
0.0— 1.5
7.0 16.8
PH (STANDA9D uNITS)
0.—I.5 t4 uEPT-f 4
)‘AA DEPTH” 4
6.1— 6.7
6.5— 6.7
6.6
6.6
0.0— 0.0
9.13- 23.1
8
6
‘..4— 7.0
6.2- 6.6
6.9
4.4
0.0— 1.5
13.2— 19.8
6
‘.
6.6— 6.9
6.5— 6.13
6.7
6.1
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
TOTAL ALKALINITY (M(;/L)
0.—I.S H OEPTH ‘.
MAX OEPTH ” 4
Il .— 23.
13.— lB.
20.
17.
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 20.1
8
4
I I .— 33.
12.— 27.
25.
19.
0.0— 1.5
13.2— 19.8
6
4
26.— 34.
24.— 35•
26.
32.
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
TOTAL P Il-lO/L)
0.—I.5 H DEPT-I 4
lA OEDTl-4== 4
0.038—0.360
0.030—0.08?
0.051
0.1,54
0.0— 0.0
9.13— 20.1
13
4
0.011—0.035
0.00u —0.04?
0.)21
0.1 24
0.0— 1.5
13.2— 19.8
6
4
0.011—0.042
0.011—0.029
0.024
0.021
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
DISSOLVED O,4THO (M(,/L(
0.—l.5 14 )E”T’- 4
MAX )EPEH= ‘
0.005—0.016
0.005—0.03?
0.008
0.0 12
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 20.1
13
4
0.005—0.009
0.005—0.009
0.007
0.006
0.0— 1.5
13.2— 19.8
6
4
0.006—0.Ols
0.OOs—U.0013
0.009
0.006
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
NO2NOI ( -4(,/ ( I
0.—I. ’ ‘4 uJEPT-u 4
‘ 7IX OEPTp==
0.410—0.540
0.020—0.500
0.475
0.405
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 20.1
13
4
0.240—0.780
0.260—0.330
0.380
0.295
0.0— 1.5
8.2— 19.8
6
4
0.540—1.140
0.550—1.120
0.850
1.010
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
k ’4M0 14I4 (‘ 11,/I)
L.-I.5 ‘ 1 PTui 4
MAX ) P1-i ” 4
0.110—0.460
0.100—0.360
0.155
0.195
0.0— 0.0
9. — 20.1
3
4
0.040—0.490
0.050—0.570
0.155
0.265
0.0— l.s
13.2— 19.13
b
4
0.140—0.7130
0.290—0.75)
0.340
0.400
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
1cJELI,A.-IL 13 (MD/L)
u.—)., Ii OEPT’-’ 4
MAX OEPTH”
0.cOO—I. ’ .Oo
0.300—0.800
0.700
0.550
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 2 .1
4
4
0.600—1.500
0.500-1.100
0.1300
0.6s0
0.0— 1.
13.2— 19.8
6
4
0.200—1.300
0.S00—j.300
0.700
0.650
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 16.8
SECC-iI ‘JI C (HElENS)
6
).b— 0.9
0.’)
4
).6 2.1
I. ’.
4
1.1— 1.8
1.4
S0
“ MAAIHUH DEPTH SAMPLED AT ACpi SITE
S NO. OF SITES SAMPLED UN TrlI JAIL
-------
MOLT LOCIX AND 04)1
1J EI Co)F 8105 PI-IYSICAL AND C 1EMICAL C8A. ACTENISTICS
MAX MAX
S °° = 4 DEPIrI S° = 4 DEPTH
PA1R,E RAN(,E
N PAN(,E MEDIAN (METEPS) N° AN(,E MEDIAN (METEPS)
N IJO. OF SAM’- L -S
MAXIMUM DEHT# .AMPL(I) AT EAC-. ShE
I I0/3I/7J I
MAX
= 4 DEPTH
RANDE
8 HANOI MEDIAN (METEMS)
fl 7/73
?A A lETED
TEMPL8AFUHE i DE ” CENT)
O .-). H DEPTH 4
MAX jEP1-, 4
23.1— 24.N
?l.8— 23.)
?6.O
?2.S
0.0— 0.0
6.1— 22.6
8
4
28.0— 29.9
26.5- 28.2
28.3
27.2
0.0— 1.5
4.6— 21.3
a
4
20.8— 22.4
19.3— 22.3
2I .
21.4
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (N(./L)
(a.—l. N uEPTH C
MAX UEPT-4° 4
O9*QOQ*Q**
4.2— 6.0
• **O
5.3
**OO **OO
6.1— 22.6
4
4
4.2— 6.4
1.4— 5.0
4.9
3.3
1.5
4.6 21.3
1.
4
4.6— 7.4
4.6— 7.8
6.1
6.0
1.5— 1.5
7.6— 19.d
COMUUCTIVIT( (U-iHOS)
0.—I.D .1 L)EPT-4 4
MAX UFPTH** 4
15 .— 205.
130.— 160.
160.
148.
0.0— 0.0
4.1— 22.6
8
4
Ii?.— 187.
168.— 175.
177.
174.
0.0— 1.5
4.’.— 21.3
8
4
155.— 164.
126.— 165.
162.
161.
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
PH ( 1ANDAkD UNITS)
0.- 1.5 I.1 DEPTH 4
MAX t,IPTr1 4
6.6— 6.9
6.6 6.9
4.8
6.8
0.0- 0.0
6.1- 22.4
8
4
6.5— 6.8
4 4- 6.5
6.6
.4
0.0— 1.5
4.6— 21.3
4
3
6.8- 6.9
6.8- 6.o
6.8
6.8
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
TOTAL ALPXALINIIY (MD/LI
L)EPTN 4
MAX UEPTN° 4
23.— 32.
19.— 27.
23.
22.
0.0— 0.0
6.1— 22.6
8
4
18.— 22.
18.- 23.
21.
22.
0.0— 1.5
a.o— 21.3
8
4
18.— 21.
10.— 21.
20.
19.
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
TOTAL P (MG/LI
0.- I. .1 1)EPT )- ’ 4
MAi I)FPT-i 4
0.1133—0.050
0.0?9—.056
0.045
0.044
0.0— 0.0
6.1— 22.6
a
4
0.uOô—G.010
0.007—0.009
0.007
0.008
0.0— 1.5
4.6— 21.4
4
0.013—0.022
0.016—0.024
0.014
0.018
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
I)I SOLVEti OPT-iO (MD/L I
&.—I .5 H DEPTi 4
MAA Prr 4
0.008—0.023
0.0)8—0.017
0.009
0.0u9
0.3- 0.0
6.1- 22.6
8
4
0.003—0.005
0.004—3.005
0.004
0.004
0.0— 1.5
4.6— 21.3
8
4
0.004—0.008
0.005—0.009
0.006
0.005
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
NU?.”h ,3 (“L’/L)
3.-I.- , JIPIH 4
MAX I)LPJ1 4
0.810—0.720
0.820—0.720
0.660
0.680
0.0— 0.0
4.!- 22.6
8
4
O.600—Q.74u
O.140—0.pbO
0.685
0.765
0.0— 1.5
4.6— 21.3
8
4
0.680—0.940
0.600—0.930
0.800
0.750
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
AMMO , )1A (Hu/L)
DEPT-i 4
MAX L)LorI 1== H
0.t/0—0.30
0.1411—0.250
3.210
0.220
0.0— 11.0
6.1— 22.6
8
4
0.060-3.2611
0.040-0.080
u.I?S
0.070
0.0— 1.5
4. — 21.3
3
4
0.020—0.120
0.020—0.120
0.0’.o
0.040
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 19.8
XJELOA-IL J (HG/LI
I).- I.5 L)E 0 TH
MAA uE T,-l.*
O. .o0—o.ioo
0. ’ .00—O.PO
0.550
0.400
0.0— 0.0
6.1— 22.6
8
4
0.200—0.800
0.200—0.300
0.400
0.300
0.0— 1.5
4 .b 21.3
o
‘
0.200—0.500
0.200—0.300
0.200
3.250
0.0— 1.5
7.4— 19.8
ECC I! UISC (MErE, S)
4
0.5— 0.9
0.6
4
1.4— 1.8
1.6
4
I.’— l.a
1.6
S = 0. OF SITES SA’4PLt ON TrIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
06/08/ 73
08 / 29 / 73
10/30/73
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock and Dam
Sampling
Date
Dominant
Genera
Number
per ml
Dominant
Genera
Number
per ml
1. Actinastrum
2. Flagellates
3. Cyclotella
4. Melosira
5. Ankistrodesmus
780
360
134
134
113
06/08/73
1. Flagellates
2. Cryptomonas
3. Actinastrum
4. Dinoflagellates
5. Cyclotella
664
521
234
143
39
Other genera
290
Other genera
27
Total
1,811
Total
1,628
1. Flagellates
2. Synedra
3. Oscillatoria
4. Raphidiopsis
5. Melosira
610
173
153
102
101
08/29/73
1. Flagellates
2. Cryptomonas
3. Cyclotella
4. Synedra
5. Dactylococcopsis
315
281
192
169
150
Other genera
327
Other genera
435
Total
1,466
Total
1,542
1. Flagellates
2. Scenedesmus
3. Melosira
4. Cryptomonas
5. Synedra
699
97
78
58
29
10/31/73
1. Flagellates
2. Kirchneriella
3. Scenedesmus
4. Merismopedia
5. Nitzschia
89
22
22
11
11
Other genera
254
Other genera
2
Total
1,215
Total
157
-
-------
2. Chlorophyll a -
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock and Dam
Sampling
Date
06/08/73
Station
Number
1
Chlorophyll a
(ug/l)
Sampling
Date
06/08/73
Station
Number
1
Chlorophyll a
(ugh)
2.2
2.1
2
7.2
2
2.6
3
a.8
3
2.7
4
3.6
4
3.4
08/29/73
08/29/73
2.6
2.2
3.6
3.7
10/30/73
10/31/73
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4.6
4.5
7.2
3.6
1.0
3.1
5.4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
N)
0.3
0.7
1.3
4
1.1
4 0.9
-------
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock and Dam
Spike(mg/1 )
Control
o.oio P
0.020 p
0.050 P
0.025 P + 0.5 N
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.015
0.025
0.035
0.065
0.040
0.065
0.015
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.640
0.640
0.640
0.640
1.140
1 . 640
1 .640
Maximum Yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
1.3
7.8
12.8
16.4
15.1
25.2
1.5
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.015
0.025
0.035
0.065
0.040
0.065
0.015
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.735
0.735
0.735
0.735
1.235
1.735
1.735
Maximum Yield
( mg/i—dry wt. )
0.8
3.8
9.1
14.7
9.5
2i .9
i .0
2. Filtered and nutrient spiked -
-J
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock and Dam
Spike(mg/i)
Control
0.010 P
Ortho
P
Conc.(mg/l)
Inorganic
Conc.(mg/1)
N
Maximum Yield
(mg/i-dry wt.)
Ortho
P
Conc.(mg/1)
Inorganic
Conc.(mg/l)
N
Maximum Yield
(mg/i—dry wt.)
0.1
5.9
0.734
0.734
0.008
0.018
0.624
0.624
0.2
5.9
0 010
0:020
0.020 P
0.028
0.624
9.1
0.030
0.734
10.4
0.050 P
0.025 p + 0.5
0.050 P + 1.0
1.0 N
N
N
0.058
0.033
0.058
0.008
0.624
1.124
1.624
1.624
15.1
10.0
23.7
0.2
0.060
0 035
0.060
0.010
0.734
1.234
1.734
1.734
17.2
17.0
29.6
0.2
-------
14
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicate that the potentials for primary production
in Bankhead Lake and Holt Lock and Dam were moderate to high
at the time of sample analyses. In both assays, increases
in yield with the addition of phosphorus as well as the lack
of response when only nitrogen was added indicate phosphorus
limitation. Maximum growth potential was achieved with the
simultaneous addition of both phosphorus and nitrogen.
The spring N/P ratios in the field were about 56/1 in
Bankhead Lake, and 76/1 in Holt Lock and Dam, indicating
primary limitation by phosphorus at the time of assay sample
collection. N/P ratios for the entire sampling year in
Bankhead and Holt Lock and Dam were 93/1 and 104/1, respec-
tively, also indicating phosphorus limitation (an N/P ratio
of 14/1 or greater generally reflects phosphorus limitation).
-------
15
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Alabama
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the maps (pages v-vi),
except for the high runoff months of January and February when two
samples were collected. Sampling was begun in March 1973, and was
completed in February 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were pro-
vided by the Alabama District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries, ex-
cept Valley Creek and the Locust Fork of the Black Warrior River
(Bankhead Reservoir), were determined by using a modification of
the USGS computer program for calculating stream loadings. Nutri-
ent loads indicated for tributaries are those measured minus known
point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS) and Valley Creek and Locust Fork
were estimated by using the mean annual nutrient loads for Big
Yellow, Little Yellow Creek, Pequesa Creek, Davis Creek, and Blue
Creek at Stations OlOlAl and Bi , and OlO5Dl , El, and Fl and
multiplying the means by the appropriate drainage area in km 2 .
-------
16
The operators of the Bessemer, Kimberly, Birmingham (Five
Mile Creek and Valley Creek) and Jasper wastewater treatment plants
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
Nutrient loads for the cities of Parrish and Sumiton wastewater
treatment plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg
N/Capi ta/year.
-------
f . paste Sources: Bankhead Lake only
1 Krown municipal -
Population 1 e Flow Peceiving
Name Served Treatment ( it /d x i0 ) Water
Valley Creek 100,000 Primary 56.529 Valley Creek
(Bessemer) clarification
Turkey Creek 1,500 Activated sludge 1.156 Turkey Creek!
(Kimberly) Locust Fork!
Black Warrior
River
Five Mile Creek 10,000 Primary 22.713 Five Mile Creek
(Birmingham) clarification
Village Creek 315,000 Primary 135.168 Village Creek! Z
(Birmingham) clarification Black Warrior
River
Parrish 175 Activated sludge 0.066* Lost Creek!
Black Warrior
River
Sumiton 2,374 Stabilization pond 0.898* Burnt Corn Creek!
Mulberry Fork!
Black Warrior
River
Jasper ** 18,000 Trickling filter 9.551 Town Creek!
Mulberry Fork!
Black Warrior
*Estimated at 0.3795 m 3 /capita/day. River
**Treats poultry processing and feed mill wastes in addition to domestic waste.
-------
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
— Bankhead Lake Holt Lock and Dam
%of %of
Source kg P/yr total Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) —
A(l) Big Yellow Creek 140 <0.1 A(l) Black Warrior River 218,870 96.7
B(l) Little Yellow Creek 190 <0.1 B(l) Rocky Branch 60 <0.1
C(l) Valley Creek 5,830 0.9 C(l) Unnamed Stream 50 <0.1
D(l) Locust Fork 27,555 4.2 0(1) Peques Creek 185 0.1
(Black Warrior River)
E(l) Lost Creek 4,335 0.7 E(l) Davis Creek 2,825 1.3
F(l) Mulberry Fork 149,610 23.0 F(l) Blue Creek 1,855 0.8
(Black Warrior River)
b. Minor tributaries and 4,140 0.6 b. Minor tributaries and 2,280 1.0
immediate drainage immediate drainage
(nonpoint load) (nonpoint load)
c. Known Municipal SIP’s - c. Known Municipal SIP’s - None
Valley Creek (Bessemer) 107,375 16.5
Turkey Creek (Kimberly) 710 0.1
Five Mile Creek (Birmingham) 26,540 4.1
Village Creek (Birmingham) 301,420 46.3
Parrish* 200
Sumiton* 2,690 0.4
Jasper 19,895 3.0
*Estjma ted.
-------
Bankhead Lake Holt Lock and Dam
%of %of
Source kg P/yr total Source kg P/y ’ total
d. Septic tanks* - 20 <0.1 d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct f. Direct
precipitation** - 650 0.1 precipitation** - 235 0.1
Total 651,300 ioo.o Total 226,370 100.0
2. Outputs -
G(l) Black Warrior River 218,870 A(2) Black Warrior River 149,105
3. Net annual
P accumulation — 432,430 77,265
*Estjmate for Bankhead Lake based on 75 lakeside residences.
Estimate for Holt Lock and Dam based on 30 lakeside residences.
**Estjmated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
Bankhead Lake Holt Lock and Dam
%of %of
Source kg N/yr total Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) a. Tributaries (nonpoint load)
A(l) Big Yellow Creek 5,245 0.1 A(1) Black Warrior River 9,588,085 96.3
B(l) Little Yellow Creek 4,390 0.1 B(1) Rocky Branch 3,590 <0.1
C(l) Valley Creek 281,665 4.3 C(1) Unnamed Stream 3,275 <0.1
D(l) Locust Fork 1,331,710 20.2 0(1) Peques Creek 13,890 0.1
(Black Warrior River)
E(1) Lost Creek 171,115 2.6 E(1) Davis Creek 140,975 1.4
F(1) Mulberry Fork 3,484,445 52.8 F(1) Blue Creek 79,395 0.8
(Black Warrior River)
b. Minor tributaries and 200,100 3.0 b. Minor tributaries and 110,230 1.1
immediate drainage immediate drainage
(nonpoint load) (nonpoint load)
c. Known Municipal STP’s - c. Known Municipal STP’s - None
Valley Creek (Bessemer) 209,845 3.2
Turkey Creek (Kimberly) 1,410 < 0.1
Five Mile Creek (Birmingham) 51,420 0.8
Village Creek (Birmingham) 755,290 11.5
Parrish* 595 < 0.1
Sumiton* 8,075 0.1
Jasper 51 ,375
* Estimated
-------
Bankhead Lake
Holt Lock and Dam
Source kg N/yr
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial -
f. Direct
precipitation** -
Total
2. Outputs -
G(l) Black Warrior River
3. Net annual N export***
Source
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial -
f. Direct
precipitation** -
Total
A(2) Black Warrior River
Net annual N accumulation
14,425 0.1
9,953,970 100.0
*Estimate for Bankhead Lake based on 75 lakeside residences.
Estimate for Holt Lock and Dam based on 30 lakeside residences.
**Estimated (See NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
% of
total
800 <0.1
% of
kg N/yr total
105 <0.1
None
0.6
100.0
None
40,195
6,597,675
9,588,085
2,990,410
9,491 ,100
462 ,870
N)
-a
-------
22
D. Mean Annual Nonpo nt ! utrient Export by Subdrainage Area;
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr jN/km 2 fyr
Big Yellow Creek 4 138
Little Yellow Creek 5 109
Valley Creek 9 435
Locust Fork (Black Warrior River) 9 435
Lost Creek 5 193
Mulberry Fork (Black Warrior River) 29 676
Black Warrior River 21 916
Rocky Branch 11 665
Unnamed Stream 11 697
Peques Creek 6 479
Davis Creek 12 628
Blue Creek 19 819
-------
23
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphoru Loading
(gfm /yr)
Bankhead Holt Lock
Estimated loading for 17.49 16.94
Vollenweider’s eutrophic loading 2.40 4.18
Vollenweider’s oligotrophic loading 1.20 2.09
-------
24
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S. EPA, 1975. Bankhead Reservoir, Birmingham, Alabama.
Environmental Protection Agency Surveillance and Analysis
Division, Biological Services Branch, Athens, Georgia.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A., 1975. Input-Output Models With Final
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37: 53-84.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FA(;TORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBuTARY FLOW INFORMATION FUR ALAbAMA 01/22/76
LAKE CODE 0101 . ANISI1EAL) LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KH) 10334.1
SUFI-OMAINAGE NORMALIZED FLOWS(CeISI
TRIBUTARY AR(A(SO
-------
I IBiJTA,?Y FLOW 1NFO 1MAT ION F0 ALAbAMA
07/22/76
LA [ COUE 0101
tiANI ’ riEAD LANE
ME,’.N MONTHLY FLOWS A8 , UAILY FL0WS(C S)
tRltjUTA Y ONTr1 YLA8 MEAN FLOW OAY
3 73 34.263
4 73 25.768
5 73 12.265
6 73 12.205
7 73 13.649
8 73 6.145
9 73 4.446
1*) 73 4.276
11 73 11.723
12 73 26.844
I 74 41.512
2 7’. 29.338
3 73 163.955
73 202.182
5 73 120.913
6 73 65.129
7 73 26.448
8 13 8.042
9 73 4.361
10 73 4.361
11 73 8.042
12 73 75.323
1 74 179.529
2 74 158.574
3 73 23.220
4 73 15.574
5 73 4.757
6 73 4.757
7 73 5.805
8 73 1.345
9 73 0.680
10 73 0.597
ii 73 4.47g.
12 73 17.188
1 74 28.373
2 74 19.425
3 73 363.985
4 73 300.158
5 73 245.507
6 73 96.560
7 73 33.980
8 73 9.033
9 73 3.398
10 73 2.764
ii 73 7.334
12 73 203.598
1 74 385.189
74 365.287
FLOW OAT FLOW (MY
3 34.263
7 25.882
3 14.158
2 12.666
ii 21.464
11 6.343
11 3.964
4 10.704
10 11.242
8 8.891
5 32.961
3 20.530
3 58.333
7 111.852
3 74.190
2 68.244
11 36.S?9
11 12.743
I l 3.341
4 6.003
10 3.0 2
8 16.056
S 150.929
9 153.760
3 23.135
7 15.688
9 3.879
14 8.560
10 2.973
17 1.209
9 0.671
14 0.374
10 4.191
9 2.390
14 15.688
12 9.854
3 111.172
7 303.613
9 309.784
14 97.127
10 22.002
17 11.298
9 3.398
14 2.627
10 2.257
9 10.137
14 271.558
17 154.610
FLOW
0 10 Id
010 liii
010 IE1
0 It) IF 1
19 21.464
15 35.651
19 80.986
17 264.196
30 26. 136
26 7.929
30 345.465
28 133.186
-------
T’ 1BUTARY FLOw 1NFO MAT1ON FOP ALA jAMA
01/22/ 7o
LA (E CODE 0101
dAN r-1FAD LAKE
MEAN 1Ot JTHLY FLOWS AND I)AILY FLOWS(CPIS)
TP I HUT APY
MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW
DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW ‘)AY
FLOW
OlOIGI
3
73
586.159
4
217.473
4
73
560.674
8
736.238
5
73
305.82
7
256.267
6
73
211.527
13
68.810
7
73
179.246
8
34.263
8
73
102.224
3
121.762
9
73
54.085
7
56.634
10
73
30.299
7
12.176
11
73
40.776
4
11.044
12
73
317.149
9
36.529
1
74
622.970
6
419.089
21
430.416
2
74
603.149
3
540.852
15
596.353
O1O IZZ
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
1
2
?
73
73
73
73
73
13
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
35.67q
24.239
7.2 1
7.221
8.891
2.067
0.991
0.623
6.853
25.542
44.174
44.174
29.45C
29.450
3
2
3
2
8
3
7
4
4
8
5
19
3
15
35.396
40.4 3
8.325
7.87?
5.3 O
2.662
0.P21
1.076
0.651
4.134
34.263
18.038
17.273
37.378
7
4
..i
10
11
7
10
9
6
21
9
17
24.352
6.626
4.899
4.502
2.067
0.108
0.108
6.286
3.794
6.634
31.149
33.980
42.475
‘
14
11
17
11
14
14
30
12
28
6.031
5.975
18.491
1.78L.
0.765
0.566
24.4b6
40.210
1.319
12.0o3
-------
TRIE3IJTARY FLOW INF0 MATlON FUR ALA, AMA
07/22/76
LAKE LODE 0105
MULF LOCK DAM
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAPcE(S0 KR) 10960.9
MEAN MONTMLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
3 73 588.990
4 73 560.674
S 73 305.822
6 73 211.527
7 73 179.246
8 73 1u2.22 ’ .
9 73 54.085
10 73 30.299
I I 73 40.776
1? 73 317.149
1 74 622.970
2 74 603.149
3 73 651.287
4 73 615.325
5 73 336.121
6 73 231.065
7 73 195.103
8 73 107.604
9 73 59.465
10 73 34.547
ii 73 ‘.9.554
12 73 339.81?
I 74 682.436
2 74 634.297
4 217.473
8 736.238
256.267
3 68.810
8 34.263
3 121.762
7 56.634
7 12.176
4 11.044
9 36.529
6 419.089
3 540.852
4 250.887
Ii 506.871
7 314.317
28 224.269
1 134.505
34.547
2 15.291
7 9.911
9 5.663
12 1144.030
12 362.456
S’J4—D AI IAGE
TRII3UTAR .’ AREAISO lull
NOI 1MAL1ZED FLOWS(CMS)
JAN FEN MAR APR MAV JUN JUL AU(,
0 1 05A1
10334.!
334.1’.
407.76
444.57
314.32
141.30
63.71
68.dI
50.97
37.38
40.78
86.93
181.79
179.78
0 10 5A2
10960.9
353.98
433.25
470.06
334.14
149.80
16.74
73.06
53.80
39.64
43.04
92.3!
192.44
o los .3 1
5. ’.
0.199
0.231
0.157
0.066
0.028
0.036
0.017
0.023
0.008
0.038
0.106
0.088
0105C1
4.7
0.170
0.19%
0.135
0.057
0.02’.
0.031
0.015
0.020
0.007
0.033
0.091
010501
29.0
1.059
1.235
0.838
0.351
0.149
0.193
0.092
0.124
0.044
0.203
0.586
O IOSE I
72 ’ ..)
8.1 4
9• 54
6. .B
2.72
1.15
1.50
0.71
0.96
0.34
1.57
4.39
0 105F1
96.9
3.5’.
4.11
2.79
1.18
4.98
6.46
0.31
4.13
0.15
0.88
1.89
2.73
010522
?66.8
9.7’.
Ii .3
7.70
3.23
1.36
1.76
O.dS
0.156
0.13)
0.630
6.43
2.78
7.85
TOTAL DRAINAGE
AREA
OF
LAKE =
10960.9
SUM OF SUB-ORMRAGE
AREAS =
10961.1
SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
TRI13UTA Y ONTr-4 YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
O lu5AI
010542
FLOW DAY
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOw OUT =
2309.33
2312.84
SUMMARY
FLOW DAY FLOW
21 430.416
IS 597.485
31 399.287
28 758.060
24 379.446
-------
T9IbIJTAPY FLOW INFORMATION FOR ALABAMA 01/22/76
LA’ E CODE 0105 rIOLT LOCK I. DAM
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANt) UAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIdUTARY MONTt 4 YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
OlOSrU 3 73 0.391 4 0.334
4 73 0.265 11 0.116
5 73 0.019 7 0.053 31 0.060
73 0.079 28 0.0
7 73 0.097
8 73 0.016 1 0.052
9 73 0.004 1 0.019
10 73 0.004 2 0.0
II 73 0.075 7 0.0
12 73 0.279 11 0.034
1 7’. 0.481 12 0.872 26 0.467
2 74 0.323 12 0.167 2d 0.133
0105C1 3 73 0.334 4 0.2db
4 73 3.227 11 0.099
5 73 3.068 7 0.045 31 0.052
6 73 0.068 28 0.0
7 73 0.084
8 73 0.014 1 0.045
9 73 0.004 1 0.016
10 73 0.003 2 0.0
I I 73 0.064 7 0.0
12 73 0.240 11 0.028
I 74 0.413 12 0.748 26 0.399
2 74 0.278 12 0.142 28 0.113
Ol oSol 3 73 2.078
4 73 1.416 11 0.617
5 73 0.42? 7 0.283 31 0.320
6 73 0.422 28 0.051
7 73 0.521
8 73 0.086 1 0.279
9 73 0.02? 1 0.101
10 73 .019 2 0.079
II 73 0.399 7 0.013
12 73 1.489 ii 0.178
1 74 2.577 9 3.030 12 4.644
2 74 1.727 12 0.895 26 0.665
O IOSE I 3 73 10.279
4 73 6.853 11 4.219
5 73 2.206 7 2.084 31 1.348
6 73 6.116 28 1.812
7 73 3.879
8 73 1.274 1 1.741
9 73 1.2C 1 1 0.464
10 73 1.25? 2 5.125
11 73 2.113 7 0.269
I ? 73 7.36? 11 1.005
74 12.261 12 20.841 26 11.780
74 8.580 12 4.531 28 1.716
-------
TRIdUTARY FLOW INFOWMATIUN FOR ALAbAMA
07/22/76
LAKE CODE 0105 ‘-IOLT LOCK DAM
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TR1HUTAJ - Y MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
0105F1 3 73 6.938
4 73 4.417 8 6.230
5 73 1.407 4 1.218
6 73 1.407 3 0.954
7 73 1.736 8 1.036
8 73 0.286 3 0.445
9 73 0.074 7 0.053
10 73 0.03? 7 0.026
11 73 1.334 4 0.035
12 73 4.984 9 0.739
1 74 8.580 6 11.185 21 6.088
7 74 7.3r6 12 2.973 15 7.306
0 10511 3 73 19.114 4 16.367
4 73 12.997 8 17.188 11 5.663
5 73 3.879 7 2.577 31 2.945
73 3.879 3 2. 33 28 0.793
7 73 4.786 8 2.888
8 73 1.134 1 2.577 3 1. .16
9 73 0.538 1 1.189 7 0.425
10 73 U.3’.0 2 1.048 7 0.3b8
11 73 3.681 4 0.368 7 0.396
12 73 13.7( 5 9 2.039 11 1.642
1 74 23.673 6 30.582 9 p8.034 12 42.758
74 23.673 21 16.764 26 22.90 4
2 74 15.857 3 9.?60 12 .212 15 20.105
2 74 15.857 26 9.061 28 6.456
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOPET PETRIEVAL DATE 7o/07/2?
010101
33 15 50.0 08? 21 05.0 3
88’flcriLAD LA,cE
01125 ALA8AMA
033991
I IEPALES 2111202
00 2 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
oeO IO 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DAlE TilE DEPTH ATEP DO TPANSP CNDUCFVY PH T ALIc NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS—DIS
IPOM OF lIMP SECCHI FIELD CALOJ TOTAL N N—TOTAL OI 1THO
FO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICI4OMHO SO MG/L M(.,/L MG/L H&/L PIG/L P
73/06/ON 10 60 0030 23.9 30 130 o.70 17 0.170 0.600 0.540 0.007
10 40 0006 23.6 6.4 120 6.70 18 0.160 0.500 0.530 0.068
10 40 0015 22.8 5.2 120 6.1) 16 0.d40 0.500 0.580 0.014
10 40 0030 21.5 4.8 115 6.70 17 0.210 0.500 0.540 0.017
10 40 0045 20.3 4.0 105 6.60 18 0.040 0.500 0.720 0.016
10 40 0058 20.1 3.6 lOS 6.60 17 u.270 0.500 0.500 0.012
73/08/?9 14 10 0000 28.8 90 252 7.00 33 0.4 0 1.500 0.780 0.006
14 10 0005 28.6 5.2 244 6.90 32 0.480 1.100 0.780 0.007
1’. 10 0015 28.3 4.8 237 6.80 31 0.480 1.200 0.800 0.005
14 10 0325 27.0 2.6 217 6.70 30 0.520 1.100 0.770 0.006
14 10 0035 24.7 0.6 170 6.70 27 0.580 1.200 0.690 0.006
14 10 0050 22.3 “.8 96 6.60 22 0.380 0.500 0.330 0.005
73/10/30 15 35 0000 22.’. 72 190 6.10 26 0.450 0.900 1.100 0.013
15 35 0005 ?2.’. 1.6 191 6.60 26 0.480 0.800 1.120 0.006
15 35 0015 22.4 1.6 191 6.50 25 0.480 0.800 1.140 0.005
15 35 0030 22.4 1.4 191 6.50 25 0.470 0.700 1.120 0.005
15 15 0355 2?.’. 1.8 191 6.50 24 0.480 0.800 1.120 0.005
03665 32217
D4TE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FF OM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UC,/L
7J/06/uM 10 40 0000 3.05’. 2.1
10 40 0006 O.OoO
10 40 0015 (‘.066
10 40 0030 0.070
10 ‘+0 0045 0.072
10 40 OOSN 0.082
73/08/2’,. 14 10 0000 0.012
14 10 0005 0.011
14 10 0015 0.010
14 10 0025 0.010
14 10 0035 0.01!
14 IC 0050 0.008
73/10/30 15 35 0000 0.016 1.0
15 35 (1005 0.011
15 35 0015 ( .009
IS 35 0030 J.009
15 35 0055 0.01!
-------
ST3 Ef LT lFV4L IJAJE 7o/07/?2
o io 102
33 30 45.0 087 15 02.0 3
8ANI
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/07/22
010103
33 33 30.0 087 11
BANKHEAD LAPcE
01073 ALABAMA
1 1EI’ALES
0019 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/06/OH 14 10 0000
14 10 0006
14 10 0015
14 10 0025
14 10 0035
73/08/25 16 30 0000
16 30 0005
16 30 0015
16 30 0030
73/10/30 16 15 0000
16 15 0010
16 15 0023
o • 360
0.040
G.031
0.034
0.045
0.030
0.0 29
3.028
0.025
0.031
0.0?8
0.029
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
05.0 3
033991
73/06/OH 14 10 0000
14 10 0006
14 10 0015
14 10 0025
14 10 0035
73/08/25 16 30 0000
16 30 0005
16 30 0015
16 30 0030
73/10/30 16 15 0000
16 15 0010
16 15 0023
7.4
7.2
7.2
5.8
6.3
3.6
1.8
6.’.
5.8
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02 N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MIC OMHO
SU
HG/L
Mb/L
HG/I
M(,/L
MG/L P
25.6
30
125
6.60
20
0.110
0.700
0.410
0.005
24.1
75
6.60
15
0.050
0.500
0.340
0.006
24.0
80
6.60
16
0.070
0.600
0.350
0.004
23.6
100
6.60
17
0.090
0.600
0.390
0.004
19.8
78
6.60
13
0.100
0.600
0.370
0.005
30.2
48
95
7.00
16
0.060
0.700
0.240
0.005
29.3
140
6.70
22
0.100
0.600
0.330
0.009
27.7
271
6.70
48
0.350
1.100
0.710
0.008
22.8
74
6.40
15
0.150
0.700
0.270
0.007
22.3
48
150
6.90
29
0.230
0.600
0.540
0.006
22.1
149
6.90
28
0.210
0.500
0.510
0.005
21.7
162
6.80
30
0.320
0.500
0.550
0.008
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
HG/L P UG/L
4.8
5.4
-------
S1O EI RETRIEVAL OATL 76/07/22
73/06/08 15 10 0000
15 10 0006
15 10 0015
15 10 0023
15 10 0032
73/08/2” 16 05 0000
16 OS 0005
16 05 0012
16 05 0020
16 05 0027
73/1 ) /30 Ii’ , 30 0000
16 30 vOOS
16 30 0010
16 30 0020
16 30 00)1
n
.J.O5 ..
3.050
0.046
0.064
0.0 35
0.028
0.029
0.035
0.042
0.042
v.037
0.0 30
‘.O25
C .026
010104
33 38 65.0 087 12 30.0 3
.iANIK’IEAD LAr E
1127 ALABAMA
033991
11E ALES 2111202
0036 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00410
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TIME
OEPTN
ATEP
DO
TRANSP
CNDuCTVY
i-61
I AL c
NHJ-N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS-DIS
FROM
OF
TFMI ’
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORT8O
10
(JAY
FEET
CCNT
MG/L
INCHES
M ICROMHO
SO
MG/L
Mu/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
73/06/0
15 10 0030
23.d
24
80
6.10
19
0.140
0.700
0.480
0.016
IS 10 0006
21.3
7.2
70
6.30
18
0.090
0.300
0.480
0.012
15 10 0015
17.6
8.0
60
6.40
15
0.100
0.300
0.460
0.013
IS 10 0023
16.9
7.0
60
6.40
18
0.090
0.300
0.440
0.012
15 10 0032
16.8
7.4
60
6.SJ
17
u.120
0.300
0.440
0.012
73/08/25
16 05 0000
30.7
24
70
6.6i
12
0.070
0.800
0.330
0.009
Lb 05 0005
29.9
5.6
69
6.’. )
II
0.040
0.600
0.320
0.008
16 05 0012
28.2
5.4
65
6.30
12
0.050
0.600
0.310
0.008
16 05 0020
22.3
7.2
53
6.30
11
0.050
0.500
0.320
0.017
16 05 u027
21.)
4.7
55
b.2*)
12
0.050
0.600
0.320
0.009
73/IC/3u
16 30 0000
?9.’
42
162
6.80
26
0.150
0.500
U.600
0.015
lb 30 0005
29.8
3.2
163
b.10
26
0.140
0.200
0.600
0.014
Lb In 0010
27.5
2.8
155
6.60
25
0.130
0.300
0.630
0.013
lb 30 0020
22.9
0.8
223
6.60
36
0.270
0.400
0.850
0.009
16 30 0031
22.4
1.0
209
6.60
35
0.290
0.500
0.900
0.008
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH ‘HOS—TuT CrIL’W9YL
Ft u OF A
TO DAY FEET H(,/L P UC,/L
3.6
1.1
-------
STO EET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/07/22
0e66 5 32217
DEPTH PHOS—TOT C ILRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
73/05/07 11 00 0000
Il 00 0006
11 03 0015
11 00 0025
11 00 00)5
73/08/?9 IS 30 0000
IS 10 0005
15 30 0015
15 30 0034
73/lo/3i lb 05 0000
15 35 0005
16 05 0015
lb 05 0033
0.033
C • 033
o .028
3.03’.
0.029
.1 .03 3
0.007
t, .008
0.009
0.022
0.021
C .022
0.0?’.
010501
33 12 45.0 087 3’. 50.0 3
rIOLT LOCK AND DAM
01125 ALAt AMA
033992
IIEPALES 2111202
0040 FEET DEI ’T i CLASS 00
0 0 0 IJ
00300
0 077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DAlE
TIME
OLPIl
*ATER
00
TRANSP
CNOuCTVY
PH
t ALK
N113—N
TOT KJEL
NO2 .NO3
PriOS—OlS
F8OM
OF
TLMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
t’
NTOTAL
ORTr1O
ID
DAY
FELl
CLNT
‘4 6/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SD
MG/L
Mt /L
M&/L
MG/L
MG/L P
73/06/07
II 00 0000
23.1
34
160
6.90
23
0.240
0.500
0.720
0.009
II 00 0005
23.0
7.4
160
6.90
21
0.230
0.400
0.730
0.011
II 00 0015
?3.0
6.0
160
6.90
21
0.210
0.400
0.730
0.010
11 00 0025
23.0
6.0
160
6.90
22
0.210
0.400
0.710
0.008
11 00 0035
23.0
0.0
160
6.90
19
0.210
0.400
0.700
0.009
73/q,8/29
15 30 0000
28.3
59
ITS
6.60
21
o.080
0.400
0.740
0.004
15 30 0005
P8.2
4,2
175
6.50
22
0.080
0.300
0.740
0.004
15 30 0015
28.2
4.8
174
6.53
lb
0.070
0.300
0.720
0.005
15 30 0034
28.2
4.5
175
6.50
18
0.080
0.300
0.740
0.004
73/l )/3l
16 05 OuJOO
20.8
72
161
b.’ 0
21
0.120
0.500
0.700
0.008
16 05 0305
20.8
4.6
161
6.80
20
0.120
0.400
0.680
0.008
lb 05 0015
20.9
4.6
151
6.80
22
0.120
0.300
0.690
0.006
lb 05 0033
?0.H
4.6
159
5.80
20
0.120
0.300
0.690
0.006
DATE T1. E
FiTOM OF
TO DAY FELT
2.2
-------
TJPET . ET, IEVAL OATE 76/07/22
010502
33 15 55.0 087 30 4 .0 3
HOLT LOCI< AND DAM
01125 ALABAMA
033992
IIEPALES 2111202
0024 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH *ATER 00 TRANSP CNOUCTVY Ppl F ALK 863—N TOT KJEL NO2bNO3 PHOS—DIS
FPOM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL UNTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT M&/L INCHES MICPOUHO 50 M4/L M4/L MG/L ML,/L HG/L P
73/06/07 11 45 0000 23.9 2’. 205 b.80 32 0.300 0.700 0.690 0.02]
11 45 0006 23.8 5.4 205 6.90 32 0.260 0.500 0.680 0.008
11 45 0013 24.0 5.0 190 6.90 2 0.210 0.400 0.280 0.006
11 45 0020 23.1 5.8 160 6.90 25 0.250 0.400 0.720 0.008
73/08/2’ 15 IS 0000 28.0 54 Ii ’ . 6.60 20 0.070 0.300 0.740 0.003
15 IS 0005 28.0 ‘ ..8 172 6.50 21 0.ObO 0.200 0.730 0.003
15 IS 0015 27.7 5.0 175 6.50 20 0.070 0.300 0.740 0.004
73/10/31 15 42 0000 21.1 6’. 155 6. 21 0.070 0.200 0.780 0.004
IS 42 0005 21.1 7.4 155 6.90 20 0.060 V.200K 0.760 0.004
15 4 0015 21.0 7.0 154 6.8(. 19 0.070 0.400 0.750 0.007
15 ..? 0025 19.3 1.8 126 6.80 10 0.090 0.300 0.600 0.005
00665 32217
OATE LIME DE TH PHOS-TOT CHLPPHYL
FROM OF A
TO UAY FEET MG/L ‘ DOlL
73/46/07 11 45 0000 ).047
11 65 0006 0.051
II 45 0013 0.034
11 45 0020 C.043
73/68/2Y 15 IS 0000 0.006
IS IS 0005 0.00?
IS ic 0015 0.009
73/1 ) /31 15 4? 0000 u.013 0.7
15 42 0005 0.014
IS 4? 0015 0.015
15 4’ 025 4.018
,( VALUE K60U9 TO BE
LESS TNAN INDICATED
-------
sTOH T P ET 1 1EVAL DAlE 7 /07,22
010503
33 17 00.0 087 24 10.0 3
?IOLT L0Cr AND UAM
01125 ALA8AMA
033991
IIEPALES 2111202
0063 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 30077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00o25 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH ATEP DO T#ANSP CNDuCTVY P11 1 ALK N113—N 101 KJEL N02 N03 PIIOS—QIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELL, CACO3 TOtAL N N—tOTAL ORTHO
10 OAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SI) MG/I M0/L MG/I MG/L MG/L P
73/06/07 12 10 0000 24.5 26 160 6.80 22 0.180 0.600 0.630 0.010
12 30 0006 26.1 6.8 ISO 6.9’. 20 0.160 0.400 0.630 0.004
I? 30 0015 23.’. 7.0 140 b.80 18 0.230 0.300 0.630 0.012
[ 2 30 0030 22.4 5.0 125 6.80 17 0.230 0.300 0.650 0.014
12 10 0045 21.9 4.8 125 6.90 18 0.210 0.300 0.610 0.017
12 30 0059 21.8 4.0 130 6.80 19 0.230 0.400 0.660 0.017
73/48/29 IS 43 OOCO 29.7 60 187 6.80 20 0.260 0.800 0.620 0.004
lb 40 0006 28.3 5.0 182 6.60 19 0.230 0.500 0.620 0.004
16 40 0015 2o.I 4.8 180 6.50 2] 0.260 0.500 0.430 0.006
16 60 0035 27.3 3.2 178 6.60 24 0.200 0.400 0.730 0.005
16 40 0050 ‘6.7 2.0 173 6.40 23 0.070 0.300 0.860 0.005
13/10/31 1’ 50 0000 22.0 60 164 21 0.030 0.300 0.9 0 0.007
14 50 0005 22.0 6.2 164 20 0.020 0.200 0.940 0.005
14 50 0015 22.1 8.0 1b4 22 0.020 1.200 0.940 0.005
14 50 0030 22.1 6.0 162 20 0.020 0.200 0.930 0.004
14 50 0063 ?2.l 6.0 162 18 0.020 0.200K 0.930 0.009
00665 32217
DATE T1r IE DEPTH ‘HOS—TOT CIILRPHYL
FPUM 1 F A
10 UAY FEET M&/L P UC,/L
73/46/07 12 30 0000 0.053 2.7
12 30 3006 (‘.052
[ 2 30 4015 0.057
12 30 0030 C.Q59
[ 2 0 0045 0.065
12 30 0059 4.056
73/08/29 [ 8 40 0000 0.010 3.6
16 40 0005 v.007
16 40 0015 0.039
16 60 0035 1.008
[ 6 . ) 0050 0.007
73/14/31 1’. 50 0000 3.OIo
14 50 0005 o.ulS
14 o OulS •j.022
[ 4 so ooio 0.016
1’. 50 0053 0.016
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN IP .OICATEO
-------
SIONET 14EIPILVAL DAlE Th/07/22
010504
33 IS 15.0 387 26 05.0 3
- ‘DLI LOCK A ” i) DAM
41125 ALA8AMA
033991
DATE
lIME
DE Ir-,
HAtER
00
TRANOP
CHOUCIVI
PH
1
0061u
00425
F ,dOM
OF
IEMP
5ECCt- .1
FIELD
NHJ—N
101 KJEL
Jo
DAY FLIT
CINT
TOIAL
N
IIE °AL IS
0078 FEET DEPT.i CLASS 00
00 6 30
NO2 N03
N— I DIAL
MD/L
00671
PriOS—t) IS
0 I riD
MD/I P
O • 008
0.006
0.011
0.016
0.016
0.0 14
O • 009
0.005
0.005
0.009
0.006
0.006
0. u05
0.005
O • 008
0 • 006
0.006
0.005
73/08/04
09 45 0000
24.1
23
150
6.60
09 45 000’.
23.6
6.4
145
6.71
0.120
0.400
0.610
09 65 OUIS
23.0
6.2
145
6.7(,
19
0.130
0.400
0.620
09 45 0030
22.7
5.2
140
6.70
22
0.140
0.300
0.640
o9 45 0040
22.
4.6
135
6.70
0.140
0.300
0.640
U’i 45 0060
22.1
4.2
135
6.60
19
0.130
0.300
0.640
09 45 007’.
22.0
4.2
135
6.60
0.130
0.300
0.660
73/ 8/?9
1’ 40 0000
29.9
70
177
6.80
0.160
0.1400
0.620
14 40 0005
28.8
6.’.
178
6.80
2)
0.200
0.600
0.640
14 40 0010
28.2
4.8
)74
6.73
18
0.170
0.400
0.600
14 40 0030
27.b
3.6
172
6.5)
20
0.190
0.500
0.620
I ’. 40 0045
27.2
2.2
172
6.50
20
0.120
0.300
0.700
14 40 0070
26.0
1.4
168
6.40
0.070
0.200
0.800
73/10/31
15 20 0000
22.3
54
162
6.80
23
0.040
0.200
0.790
15 20 00J ’5
22.’.
6.0
163
6.80
0.030
0.200
0.820
15 20 0015
22.3
4.0
162
6.8 )
18
0.030
0.200K
0.820
IS 20 0036
22.4
6.2
161
6.8u
0.030
0.200K
0.820
15 20 0065
22.3
6.0
165
6.80
20
21
0.030
0.030
0.200
0.2006
0.810
0.810
DAlE
TIME DEPTH
00665
Dri0S T0T
32217
CP4LRPHYL
F14Or l
OF
A
10
oAT FEET
MG/I
UG/L
73/04/014
09 45 0000
u.O ’ . ’ .
3.’.
09 45 0006
0.037
09 45 001,
0.042
09 45 0030
0.0414
09 45 0045
0.040
09 45 0060
0.0’?
09 45 0074
o.050
73/08/29
14 40 0000
0.006
3.7
14 40 1)005
0.010
14 40 0015
0 .0v ’
14 40 3033
).0U14
14 4) 0340
;.Oul
I ’. 40 u070
.O07
73/10/31
IS 70 0000
0.016
0.9
15 70 0005
1.018
IS 20 0015
J.015
IS 20 0035
p.016
15 ‘0 u065
0.ui8
IS VALUE KN0 4 10 BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX 0
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
iJ)’ I rtL] IrVAL UAI r 7(’i/ 1/22
Lb’) it, jA I
__$J ‘ 4 .)J.J , r ’,1 ‘ + 0U, ‘.
1) YLLL(J. L’ tL ’
t I J TJs(ML ’JOSA C
T/ s IE ) LAr,r U 33*fl
t) )-(l)U “jt ur i—iJ [ 5i’j
11 Lr l1jt u
ij( ( ’ ti iT Utf-Tri CLt 5S ‘J O
U 0O ?S C)t 1U 1 11
i) Tt I 1M )fPT’-l tU NO 3 TOT ,cJEL ‘.r13-N f iOSiJ ’, “riUSIJl
(I ,—t 1tf L N TOTAL U 1H ’)
F’, H4Y FEEl (,/L 1G/L l( /L MG/L P M(’/L -
7J/ ( 4i/03 13 i.0 ?d fl.9i 0 ). 34 t’.0 1
73/ /O? LI S .u4e. 1.980 1.07J 0.005K (J. U , J
7j/:) /0 . 10 ‘.020 .016 .tj05i
7 j/.jO/O 3 u ?‘-. U.03L 0.175 ‘.C2u ?.007
7J/(I1I ’) LI ‘S . .0-) 0.250 .01b Ij.016
13/jr /03 14 ,r ‘.0? ’ 0. 140 •i.t ?5 , . UO
73/i / , Ii .C’1 0• 1 ’J • ijk ‘.uII 0.920
73/1 ,/QI 13 .0I9rs (4•253 .03? c . ,os tc
l /iI/tj . L ij “.03 5 C. - O0 ‘.022 c.0O5 u.U lj
73/1?/0-’ 10 Jo U.0 t. 0.100 .024 o.(,05K 0.010
7’./u1/tjh ,‘ 20 ‘. lO O 0.200 .02t 0.005K j.OI5
7 +/UL/ ,’L I C ) “ O .07€ 0.I’ 0 C.o3? i.utH
7 ./) -/0 13 10 .0t 0.100K ,.010 0.005 U.’J O’)
7./?/15 LI 15 0.?0) ‘i. O) O (4.03 , ,
r V LU r NOnN IC) 3E
LL’S Trlt.N LNPIC’YEt)
-------
5tO T [ 1EVAL ‘)ATL 7 /(’7/2’
uI 1-1 L 01 i1h 1
33 34 UJ.J F ?‘+ iO.o 4
L!1FL . YELLJw C Er
MAP TUSCALOOSA C
T/r AN -l AL) LAr t 0j39 l
C h iL (U t-ft I)G W UI- WHITSUN
11 ALL 1112J4
JOuO FLtF Dt PTrl CLASS 00
(.‘)630 00625 CC610 00671 0 6bS
DATE T tt E D [ PT 1 JO ? .NO3 TOT KJEL H3—N PHOS— )IS PHOS—Tol
‘J—IUTAL N TOTAL UPIHU
uM FEET M(,/L MG/L MU/L G/L P
73/•)3/UJ 40 .120 0.620 C’.044 (.050
13/ 4/0, 10 -c j• 3) 2.?00 j.094 0.005K 0.O lu
li/ 05 /t)’. LU 40 0.06 0.Th0 0. 132 0.005K 0.010
731)6/03 OM 15 .076 0.3’ 0 3.016 0.011 u.035
73/tl/Uc II IS c.O 6 O.?40 ..(11 0.006 0.0 1 5
73/r,c3/03 14 I C .06 ) 0.140 .u25 0.007
73/ -I/o7 1’. . 13 -c 0.190 1.010 0.U OSrc
73/10/OF 13 70 u .010’\ 1.47 .O 4 t 0.00 5K 0.09C
7jul10 ’. 10 ‘.5 Z .02 3.?75 i.075 (.Ou’Pc 0.027
13/L /0- 10 30 ).11.? 0.’0) A. 1 40 C.00Sr
l4/jl/O 09 0 3.384 C.300 j.0 1 2 0.005K
7’./ j1/21 Ii c o 3.160 0.2 0u .02’. i .005< 0.010
7./. c’/03 1315 O.100 o.OlS 0.010 0.u l()
7-4/ /15 11 ‘O ‘.112 0.300 0.055 0.005 0.uiO
, VALUE , i’1OwN TO BE
LtSS THAN INDICATED
-------
SI i’ ET Mc 7e /07/?2
JiulCi L301) IC !
iJ 34) Ou.J )riI ld iU. 4
VALLY Ck L\
9Ar J fEt SUN CO
T/-jANr-l 4I) LAKE 0i3991
tj 4 ) ,t- AV [ ( c. OF LO T 21
211123’4
‘J00T1 t E uE- E-i CLASS rj
0063u
0O6?
0 . 10
O Oei,1
0j665
L) IE
TINE
fl Tr1
NO2 ’1OJ
TU) KJEL
NH3—N
I HOS—D1s
PhOS—TO!
F Ur
OF
:4—TOTAL
N
TUTAL
of rHo
Eu
;.L Y
FEET
1b/L
1G/L
Mt,/L
Mj/L r
73/c 3/4)3
16
ir
j. 560
5.?’O
.00O
(‘.005K
7J/ 4/Q7
UY
4(i
i.9 4J
.- fl0
?.900
0.00 5K
0.O3
7. /( /Oj
17
I(’
!.1’ ,
5. ’ ’)0
1.400
0.005K
73/t,6/0?
15
35
1. Ohj
4.500
0.010
0.04
73/ri/U
iç
u.’ .6D
0. 30
.?i3
C.u06
7j/j i/ 1
Lu
. 5
..‘.Su O
0.660
G.3” O
0.04)7
7 ii/’i-’/Ll
Jh
It)
.4hU
1.430
.610
0.uO5PS
u.ub
73/I J/0 .
11
10
.540
0.340
0.uJ l
O.u0 K
7j/j)/ [ j
tO
20
1.14)3
2.503
1.600
0.00 5K
73/I /0 3
1?
3
3.Q 0
3.700
‘. 4))
0.032
7’./’t/0
0
10
0.’, 60
2.0)3
1.’ .e4.)
u.005K
.03u
7 1 ,/4)1/N
J 7
.U
1.000
2.300
1. 70
0.005 K
0.055
7 4 i i
1’)
34)
‘.6 #D
1.uO0
.63u
3.005
74/lJ /17
U
40
0.620
?.500
).910
0.005
K VALUE ‘c O N TO BE
LLSS IHAN INDICATLU
-------
STLjktl ETkIEVAL DATE 7f / 1/?2
Ol olu’) L 01.. 1u1
33 3L. 30.0 J8 0 l 3U.J 4
LUCLJSI For r(t LACr\ Akr IO r I’dtl)
ul MAP JEFF PSUN CO
T/t IGrtEAu LAKE 0J39 ’1
MAXINE 3I LIU NEAR VL(’ OF iAx1wE
lLr-’ALES 21112.i.
00th.) F E DEI- TII CLASS 00
03610 0J671 0tJb 5
DATE TIME [ PT9 NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N P OS—DIS P lOS—TJJ
Fr )i i O ,—IOTAL TOTAL UkTrlO
TO Ui Y FEET Mb/L “IG/L MC,/L MG/L P
13/ui/0J 1e ‘ 5 t.930 2.500 0.650 0. OL?
73/u 4 /0I Ui ‘ 0 J.730 L. .4 ( 3 0.32’) 3.006 0.030
73/u’5/03 17 4 e.69u 3.- 70 c.?52 0.007 0.05u
7j/u’ /02 16 30 ).5SU ?.000 ‘ .220 j. Olb 0.055
73/ 7/I1 30 L.26U 0.690 i.252 0.056 U.!!’)
73/u i/U u’) 45 1.6J0 1 ’O3 .56.) (.020 u.36)
73/ j /L1 i J 1.42 0.!30 0.0 t’ (s. OOtj
73/h/U’-. 20 o Ij 73,,) 5.100 3.603 0.690 U.d O O
73/1 1/10 0 -i 0 2.3u0 ?.300 1.103 0.138 o.diu
73/Ii ’/0’1 13 CO t .930 1.Fl0 1.2 6 3 0.1 6 i
7’./ ’jl/0S U’ ) -.5 1.093 0. -0O .1oD ‘ .J12
74/01/19 JY 10 3.7 9 0. ’ O0 ‘.193 u.C)I0 0.055
7’ / ( //09 09 30 0.7b0 1.000 ‘ ..1’ U 0. 15
7’s/tjd/17 11 10 0.830 1.400 (‘. )20 u.01 C.1€,U
-------
T!.J LI ‘ctT ftVA( t)ATf lo/cil/22
OLU ILI L 011JIE1
33 3 00.0 J lf 15 00.o 4
LU T CFE
01 4A1- AL c Cu
T/ht r -iE4 1 , LAKL o
L)’ UN CU E 53 d• Uf oOOi) 5 ji ,
1!t ’- LES 2I11d 4
tLEI D r’TH CLASS )
C 3o 00625 0 61u 0 671 0O6o
i)A1 lIME DLPTr NO2 NO3 TOT r JEL Nr 3-N PHOS—DIS ?HOS—TU1
N—TOTAL N TOTAL O T -4’J
1 -U U, Y FLr 1 4(.,/L MG/L M(,/L PlG ’L P
fi/:3/03 1 ?c i.370 1.? ’J .ui3 0. 05K 0.020
7 3/u’4/Ul 13 1 c..’..o 0. ’00 C.067 0.005K 0.325
73/.j5/Q- uQ 15 ‘.?90 0.370 1.037 (.013 0.020
73/.)h/j4 1 ’. 41 I.3 9 0. 70 C .O30 ).00r3 0.0j(j
73/Ohio 11 10 i.o 1. 00 .C72 ).0 H tj.u23
13/ups/If l 3. Obu 1.’ - 0 C.04) C.u o slc
13/j-,’/0 - 11 N C.067 o.c o 0.02 1 0.005<
13/hi/i’. 11 15 0.1i 1.t O 93 fl.0 J5K u.ud5
13/Il/li ii 0 J.60i 1.100 .044 i.008 O.03u
hj/1/0 ii 0.50’. 0.400 3.048 r. O O Src 0.035
7’./ I/i’. 11 4 d.31? 0.300 :. 036 o.016 .i05
7 ’ ./0 /33 13 15 ‘.?60 0.530 p.03? P.305 t. .1,40
74/u /1, 11 4 C.36 . O’3 G55 ct.010
7’. // ij j 0.276 0.F i0 .10o 0.& 5 0.u31
I\ VALUL K N i b
LISS THAN jNOIC ,TLJ
-------
T i EF E1RftVA L)flft l ’/ul/?2
3101F 1 LS01u1
.i3 3 30.0 1 10 iO.0 4
MJL Y FU K(t3LA(A 4Ar r I)r RVP)
J1 MAr WALIçE co
I/rNv .t EAI) LA L 33399 1
CO ELAN [ ) Er F Y B Ju b MI S OF COPOOVA
11L ALES 21112 o ’ .
000’) FLEE 1J P- TH CLASS Ou
)C 63u 00525 0n610 00671 0 665
DATE TPAE DEPT’, JO2 .NO3 rot JEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PrIOS—TtJt
Fk 01 N-TU TAL TOTAL OPTHO
[ 0 L)AY FEET MG/L M( /L Mc,/L MG/L ?
73/ii/03 11 4 1. ’ i) .,.12C j. O Obrs
73/04/07 13 0 C.3?t) 1.000 .056 0.011 0.045
73/ .,5/0 09 15 .42) (,.IM O ,.O33 .01d 0.030
73/05/14 14 25 0.315 0.Mj O C.034 0.u28
l i/F/Li 11 nO C.340 0. ‘3 ‘.03’. i.U15
73/Od/L7 o uO .20 1.10’) (.043 O. OQStc 0.O -J
73/09/09 11 70 3.210 ‘.u27 0.005K 0.03J
73/lo/L’. 11 1’) O.1’.7 0.900 ( .14Q o.0Ul
73/11/10 12 05 0.650 0.450 ).04’. 0.001
73/I2/0’- 11 10 0.44 0.500 .052 0.00
1’./,l,’1’4 ii .66O 0.400 .C40 0.020
74/ol/3u 13 20 ... ‘ .90 Q.1 )C .u2M 0.065
7 / /1’ 11 2 C .67? O.1’)O .03o Ł.01 ’
7’./u, /?r 11 ?i) .55? 0.100 o.0JO o.o O S 0.u40
‘S V. LU PS OWf’i To tlE
LtSS ThI 1NI)IC .IEJ
-------
S1U E.T t- EJRJ [ VAL OAIE R-,/37/e’
U 101L ,I L 01ojc 1
33 2/ 3C.V ,87 21 30.0 4
hL Cr.. A- 1OI r IVr
4A -’ TUSCALUOSA C
O/ ANKHEAU LAtc 0339 fl
LUCK 1/ 2.4 til sw OF PATTUN MILL
l lLr’ALLS 2111204
OCjOu FELl O PTH CLASS 00
C063J 00610 (i - 71 00’65
D1 1L TIME DE ’Tr-i ?JO . O3 TOT KJEL N 13—N P OS— .,I P’-’ .,S—TOT
F Ci OF ‘ —TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
FU U4Y FEST MO/L P MG/L
73/jj/03 0915 1.400 v.251 U.0U5 0.015
73/ ii0? 10 00 C.294 2.100 ,.240 ‘e. O Io 0.125
7J/”S/0’i 11 10 0.450 3.100 (.265 0.013 0.040
7J/’ t/0j u 15 C•53. ) 0.730 v.168 0.033 0.100
h/Cl/On 11 .6t0 0.5 20 (.243 0.o O5K 0.u2 0
7 /uci/O 1440 .500 0.t 10 0.2u5 0.005K C.01-
7J/fl’, /07 1 . 1 - .55’i 0.660 ‘.463 0.U O5K
73/ I/ O? 13 5fl (..6 ’) u.990 J. 4u 0.005K ,.C’15
73/ 11/04 13 ? I .44 j 0.700 0.00 5 K 0.u13
7j/l?/O’. 10 ‘S ?.52 0.3C0 .02o 0.005K u.01i
7s./ I/0h 10 Ic 0. 13 0.500 .I32 (P.312 C.06U
7 ./ti/?1 1’+ 40 t .720 0.200 :J.l3 0.0o5
7’/ / 3 14 4 0.?)u 3.100 (.01
7 ’./Jc /15 11 5 .SuJ Q. .vO .)‘ ‘5 ( .010
K VALUE K JOw J Fe 8t
LESS T’-i t INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL L)ATE 76/07/22
OLO ICA PRO IOICA P100000
33 24 05.0 086 58 00.0 4
VALLEY CREEK (BESSEMER)
01 JEFFERSON Co HWY
T/8ANKMEAU LAKE _033992
VALLEY CREEK —
11EPALES 2141204
ouoo FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORIIIO RATE FLOW—MGD
TO JAY FEET MG/L MG/L HG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGI) MONTHLY
73/03/29 08 00
CP(T)— 0.105 7.400 0.140 2.000 3.800 15.000 15.000
73/03/30 08 00
73/04/28 00 00
CPU)— 0.58u 7.900 0.220 1.500 3.900 15.000 15.000
73/04/28 24 00
73/05/24 08 00
CPU)— 0.290 13.000 11.200 5.600 6.000 15.000 15.000
73/05/25 08 00
73/06/28 08 00
CP(T)— 0.230 11.000 0.440 2.300 5.000 15.000 15.000
73/06/?9 08 00
73/07/28 0.050 11.000 0.030 4.150 6.000 15.000 15.000
73/08/21 00 00
CP(T)— 16.000 6.300 8.100 15.000 15.000
73/08/21 24 00
73/09/?t Q.2b0 8.000 2.320 5.000 6.150 15.000 15.000
73/10/30 12 00
CP(T)— .240 21.000 7.000 7.200 9.400 15.000 15.500
7 3/Iv/31 12 00
73/11/2Q 12 00
CP(T)— 9.200 0.094 2.100 4.300 15.000 15.000
73/11/30 12 00
73/12/27 12 00
cp(r)— 2.310 4.300 0.084 0.960 2.500 14.200 13.000
73/12/28 12 00
74/01/3u 12 00
CP(T)— 0.400 6.400 0.220 1.600 3.500 13.500 15.000
74/01/31 12 00
74/02/25 1 00
CP(T)— 0.360 7.100 0.085 2.100 3.600 16.300 15.700
74/G2/26 12 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/37/22
OLO 1DA ASO 1O 1DA P001500
33 4b 20.0 086 48 40.0 4
TURKEY CREEK (KIM8ERLEY)
01 JEFFERSON Co HWY
T/BANtcMEAI) LAKE 033991
TURKLY CR/LOCUST UK BLACK WARRIOR RIVER
I1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
03630
00625
00610
00671
0066
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
PTr
N021.N03
TOT KJEL
NH3N
P805015
PHOSTOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW-HGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
7J/08/0i
(‘8 00
CPU)—
0.150
1.100
0.076
0.445
0.542
0.087
0.088
73/08/01
16 00
73/09/01
08 00
CP(T)—
6.000
0.840
1.370
73/09/01
16 00
73/lo/02
00 00
CPU)—
0.340
10.500
0.036
1.000
1.950
73/10/02
08 00
73/12/03
08 00
CP(T)—
3.300
1.700
0.032
2.520
2.600
0.150
73/12/03
16 00
74/01/03
14 00
2.600
3.000
p.040K
2.800
3.200
0.200
74/02/01
08 00
CP(T)—
1.280
1.900
0.040K
1.200
1.450
0.700
74/02/0 1
14 00
74/02/28
08 00
CP(T)—
2.700
1.000K
0.091
1.600
1.950
0.600
74/02/2
14 00
74/04/02
15 oo
2.520
1.000K
0.130
2.300
2.500
0.200
74/05/09
11 00
1.262
1.600
0.010
1.050
1.600
0.461
0.463
74/06/04
11 00
0.800
1.100
0.130
1.550
1.850
0.425
0.380
74/07/08
15 00
0.640
4.300
0.220
0.390
0.630
0.200
0.210
74/08/05
14 30
0.960
2.200
0.070
0.560
0.560
0.180
0.174
74/09/03
11 00
0.520
?.2 00
3.075
0.790
0.900
0.180
0.195
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATEL)
-------
SIO8ET ETI IEVAL DATE 75/07/22
O lOliTh PRO IO IOII P010000°
33 35 30.0 Q 6 48 30.0 4
FIVE MILE CREEPc (8I MINGHAM)
01 JEFFE SO8 CO hWY
T/dANIc HEAD LAI E 033992
FIVE MILE CREEK
11E ALES 2141204
0000 FEET D PTI1 CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066 50051 50053
OAIE lIME OEPtri NO2e .N03 TOT KJEL N83—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
F uM OF FJ—IOTAL N TOTAL ORTrIO RATE FLO MGD
10 UA FIET MG/L M6/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MOO MONTHLY
73/33/30 00 00
CP(E)— 0.350 6.600 0.115 0.750 2.100
73/03/31 24 00
73/04/26 00 00
CP(T)— 0.70 4.330 0.189 0.900 2.200
73/04/26 2’ of)
73/05/2’. 0.058 7.400 3.077 1.590 3.500
73/05/22 00 00
CPU)— 0.198 5.100 0.770 0.950 2.630
73/06/2? 2’. 00
73/07/2 ’ 08 00
CPU)— 0.100 6.100 3.500 1.800 3.200 6.000 o.000
73/07/27 06 00
73/08/24 0.180 8.900 0.450 0.470 3.800
73/uV/20 0.033 10.300 4.900 4.460 7.100
73/10/74 00 00
CPU)— 0.110 9.300 1.320 3.780 5.400
73/10/2’. 02 00
73/11/27 0 DO
CPU)— 0.520 6.900 0.056 1.600 3.500
73/11/28 08 00
73/l2/1 ’ 08 00
0.040 11.500 0.900 3.100 6.000
73/12/20 06 00
74/01/2? 00 00
CPU)— 0.440 7.100 0.062 0.925 2.200
74/01/22 U? CO
7’./02/25 00 00
CP(T)— U.4 0 2.500 0.074 0.600 2.400
7’./u2/2’, 0? 0))
74/oi/?.-, 0.800 7.700 o.osoc 1.250 3.150
ic VALUE ,cr4OWN 10 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
SIU ET 8ETR!EvAL DATE 7 ,/O1/22
Ol oltiC PROIOIOC P315000
33 34 30.0 086 52 30.0 4
VILLA(,E CPEEK (8IRMINGHAM)
01 JEFFERSON Co HdY
T/k3ANKHEAD LAKE 033991
VILLAGE CR1 BLACK 4RRION RIVER
IIEPAL IS 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 0’)610 00671 00665 50051 50053
L)A1L TIME DEPTH •‘ O2 N0J TOT t JEL NN3-N Pr105015 PHO —TOT FLOW CONDUiT
FPOi OF I’.—TOTAL N TOTAL URTHO RATE FLO -MGD
TO (JAY EFET MG/L HG/L MG/I. MG/I. P MG/L P INST MOD MONTHLY
73/04/11 09 00
CP(1— 0.360 13.200 0.300 1.890 5.250 S3. O0 51.900
73/04/12 09 00
73/05/?? 09 00
CPU)— 0.035 14.700 2.400 ?.900 5.850 41.600 38.600
73/05/23 OV 00
73/06/ Ih 09 00
CP(T)— 0.016 21.000 4.700 4.500 8.100 31. 00 3b.000
73/06/ 19 09 00
73/07/23 09 00
CPU)- 0.080 13.000 1.980 2.600 4.900 33.400 32.500
73/07/24 09 00
73/08/ 19 09 00
CP(T)— 0.037 1.540 0.960 3.460 34.400 31.100
13/08/20 09 00
73/09/i( 69 00
0.030 29.000 6.200 5.360 .1OO 17.300 20.HOo
73/0 /1H 09 00
73/10/2? 09 00
CPU)— 0.017 23.000 5.300 5.200 8.300 29.900 29.700
73/10/23 09 00
73/11/21 09 00
C (T)— 0.180 15.500 3.100 3.000 5.400 30.700 20.600
73/11/2? 09 00
73/12/Ill 09 00
CP(T)— 0.030 25.000 3.900 6.000 8.800 32.200 32.000
73/1?/19 09 00
74/01/21 09 00
CPU)— 0.406 17.000 0.220 1.440 3.750 36.700 35.100
74/01/2? 07 00
74/02/20 09 00
CPU)— 0.880 7.300 0.140 1.560 3.600 52.400 ‘+1.400
74/v2/21 07 00
74/03/21 09 00
CPU)— 0.080 18,000 4.900 3.250 7.500 44.500 +0.500
7 /03/2? 09 00
-------
u IE
U)
74/0’./23 0’ 00
C’- ( T ) —
74/ )4/2’. 0 ’ 00
o 1 ) 1 DC
33 3’. 30.0 U 6 52 30.0 4
VILLADE C EK ( 1NM1N ,MAMI
U I JEFFE SO j - y
f,riA KriEAt) LAKL U i3’ 1
V1LLAI C / 3LACic RI- 1Ok 1VLk
11E ALLS 21412:4
0)00 FELT E)Ei- Ti-s CLA5S 00
s1 n t:t RETRIEVAL DAlE 16/07/2?
P O 10 IIJC
p-’31500 0
0630
(06?5
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
TJM [
DL TH
l02 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
r’ -1OS—DjS
PHOS-TOT
FLOW
CUNDUIT
Of
-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
URTr-iO
RATE
FLOw—MUD
DAY
FEET
MG/I
4G/L
M(,/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
U ST M( D
MONFrILY
.0dO
12.COO
5.600
?.300
b.60u
‘+2. 00
4Ij.0 0 0
-------
ro
-------
SIONET 1 IEVAL DATE 7f /OF/22
01 1FA PUO1J IFA 0U2374
ii 4 00.0 IJ 7 04 00.0
11 ON
UI wALK CO -iwy
T/Nicr-IEAi) LA’ L 03J9 1
t1Lh N1 CORN C /MuL t Y Fpc L CK WARI 10P
LItPALES 214120’.
0000 FEET Ii i T CLuSS
u0 ’3i 0C6? 0o& 10 u0f 7I 006e5 500’ 1 Su0 3
DAIS T [ ME D [ PT 4 NO2 NO3 TOT JEL NH3—N Pt-iOS—DIS PHOS—TUT FLOW CONDuIT
FROM N—tOTAL N TOTAL W T9O PalE FLOw—Muu
To uav FEET M&/L M(2/L MG/L P ? INST Mt ) MUN1HL
73/ul/?0 UR On ,.140 “.9C0 0. ’.ô0 2.01)0 2.400
73/O’4/18 O 10 .300 7.100 O.2 5 4.040
-------
STOHEF PEI lEVAL DATE lo/07/22
DAlE
F 0M
TO
73/04/17
C, (1) -
73/0 4/ IN
73/05/10
CP IT) —
73/05/11
73/uô/20
CP IT) —
7 3/v6f23
7 3/vl/?4
CP IT) -
73/0 7/24
73/OH/ lb
CP C I) —
73/08/ 1
73/09/17
CP CT) -
73/09/ 17
73/ 10/0
CP (TI —
73/l,/03
73/1 1/?0
C’ ( I)—
73/11/20
73/12/Oh
CP C 7)—
73/12/oh
74/01/07
CI (TI —
74/C I/O?
4fi2/ 14
CP C TI -
74/(2/1
14/OJ/?I
CP C TI —
74/03/21
hr DEPTH NO e .NO3
DAY FFET “a—ToTAL
MG/L
O S 00
08 00
UN 00
08 00 7.1 0
00 00
24 00 0.880
00 00
24 00
00 00
24 00 9.800
u0 00
24 00 b.800
00 00
24 00 11.230
00 00
24 00 13.000
00 00
24 00 8.100
00 00
24 00 7.560
00 00
24 00 5.830
00 00
?4 00 6.6u0
3 101 .C IFO IO IFC P0Li3000
33 50 00.0 087 14 00.0 4
JASPER SIP
01 WALPçE CO HWY NA
h/r3ANKHEAD LA’ L 033991
TOWN CR/MOL8ER Y Fic BLACK WAI 1OR RIV j.
IIEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
TOT PcJEL
NH3—N
PiIOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
50053
N
TOTAL
0PTHO
FLOw
CONUUIT
‘COIL
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
RATE
INST HOD
FLO —MGD
MONTHLY
13.200
7.200
6.300
7.300
2.430
.d00
17.600
.800
h.300
6.’.00
2. oO
d.SOO
4.300
1.580
3.400
3.90u
3.500
3.000
7.500
‘.400
4.400
6.400
2.900
2.400
4.000
2.460
0.023
2.300
.400
9.300
4,000
7.710
8.500
1.900
1.800
8.300
4.400
6.400
7.500
2.500
2.jOO
4.600
1.980
6.800
7.70u
2.100
1.900
7.600
3.700
5.375
7.050
2.300
2.300
3.100
1.040
2.lbO
2.600
3.400
3.100
.30O
3.300
3.800
5.400
3.200
3.100
-------
STO ET Nt.W!EVAL DATE /0 7 /r P0 OuO ’
33 50 00.0 OH/ p. oo.o
JASPEI SW
01 LKL CO i Y MA
T/KA IKhEAi) Li (E 0339Y1
TOWN C) /MULr3E Y f t c bL Csc wA U0R Rj E
11 E ’ALES 21’.12 4
6)00 FELT 1i - Tri CLA S 00
006b SO(iSl 50053
Pr-jOS—TOT FLO. CONUOLI
RATE FLO —M(,b
MG/L P INsI r Gl) M JNTr1LY
74/04/30 00 0
CP (T ) —
74/04/30 24 0(’
00630
00625
0 )610
0u671
DATE
TIME
DEPTrI
NO NOJ
TOT KJEL
NHJN
PHOSDIS
F JM
OF
N—TOTAL
TOTAL
OPTHO
10
uAY
FEET
f iG/L
Mc/L
M(,/L
MG/L
4.300
5.200 b.200
“.300
-------
5T* E1 NE1 1EVAL iJATE 7f i’(7/2?
JI ’j -41 L 01’)DA1
i3 if i.0 ( r’.f ‘+ ti.j 4
r L Ct’ WO teJur r jV’ r
FUSCAL)U ,A C
i/’— ULT LuCic ‘ NL 1),’l i33991
Al ‘ A < -itAD ‘JA 1
A1. .ALL 21112r ,
OOUu E F UE Tr’ CL4 . U
OOhJ( 00625 00610 oc.o. 7 1 0066- ,
)ATE TIMI- 1)L’ ’t’-I •‘ iO2&NO3 101 rcJEL Nr’ —N p bI1OS tJ1S PH0 —TUT
FrW (iF ‘ TOTAL N TOT . L OPT 1()
TO OAY FL T 1&/L M G/i ‘i(,/L iG/L Mb/L l-
73/03/0’. 13 1C 0.52U )•47Q O.?Q0 .O11 0.0?5
73/”.’/Orl 1 5 .j. ’410 O.PO0 ‘.115 0.O0 u.C’3 )
73/ ,/07 2.500 .189 0.0?3 Q . 1j45
73/06/03 0’4 5 ..S60 ?.SO0 0.360 C.0
73/ 7/O-1 i ’ ?O ‘.0S2 0.240 .).052 o.0i1
lj/0 3/03 1’. SO ( .510 0.520 ..210 G.00’ c
73/0’ /07 1’. 45 ( .570 0.5’ 0 0.450 0. 005tc
73/13/07 14 00 0.560 1.000 0.730 t .G09c
73/11/0’. 11 37 1.430 0.250 0.0?3 0.O05t
73/12/O’ 10 5 2,52 1.300 j. I OR 0.o05 1c 0.1)1.)
7 ’./0t/0e 11 0 ‘ .b1’J 0.400 .112 0.012
74/ )1/ i 11 ‘DO ‘.b3U 3. u0 (.134 (.00’ u.uS ,
7 ./ ?/03 1’. “ S (.504 0.100 .055 u.010
74/u2/15 1? 1 0.50 0.500 J. 100 3. l0
V LOE KN0 N TO tIE
LESS I l-IAN INfl1C TEu
-------
,TORL RETRIEVAL DATE 76/07/22
010 A2 L 0105A
33 15 30.0 087 26 30.0 4
bLACK WOr JOR IVEri
01 MAP TUSCALOOSA C
0/HOLT LOCK AND UAM 033991
SAMPLE AT HULl LOCK AND L)AM
I ItPALLS 21112J4
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIMF DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PrtOS—OIS PMOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
Tu UAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L ‘i(,/L P M&/L P
73/03/0 11 ?5 o.530 2.100 0.220 u.O lu 0.025
73/3 /11 12 50 0.410 2.310 0.260 0.007 0.025
73/05/07 18 30 0.’.30 2.800 0.190 0.029 0.040
73/05/31 08 50 C’.540 0.780 0.465 0.011 0.030
73/06/28 06 30 0.b 0 0.350 0.018 0.005K 0.0 15
73/08/01 07 30 u.590 0.420 0.1 9 0.005K 0.010
73/09/010700 3.620 0.170 0.170 0.010 0.015
73/10/0 i6 00 0.890 0.440 0.052 0.009 0.010
73/11/07 09 30 0.830 0.200 0.033 0.005K 0. J20
73/12/09 10 20 1.510 0.200 0.016 0.005K 0.005K
74/ i/12 11 30 (,.720 1.000 0.140 0.012 0.050
74/01/2b OY 00 u.790 0.232 A.232 0.008 0.030
7 /. 2/12 09 70 0.630 0.500 .145 0.010 0.017
74/02/28 08 30 0.540 0.500 C.115 0.005 0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS TMMN INDICATED
-------
srU
-------
sTo1 Er RETRIEVAL UATE 76/37/22
0105C1 LS010’ C1
33 lb 00.0 097 25 .30.0 4
UNNAMED ST EAt i
01 MAP TUSCALOOSA C
T/riOLT LOCS AND DAM u33991
[ ND Ru NEAR R(JILL)ING 1.5 MI N P [ TERSO
1 1EPALES 21112ot,
0000 FEET OEPTi-i CLASS 00
00630 00625 0o610 00671 00665
DArE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N I- -,OS—OIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL URTHO
TO L)AY FEET “l(.,/L M&/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/03/0 ’. 11 C ‘). 80 1. O Ou .138 0.007 O. 03u
73/ /11 12 35 0.360 2.700 c.i 0.0 CM 0.025
73/05/07 07 O 0.410 0.940 0.147 0.025 0.040
73/05/31 09 25 0.5’+0 1.300 0.390 0.009
7J/06/? 3 06 40 0.710 0.350 0.048 0.014 0.015
73/d /01 0 i 15 0.610 0.350 C.lb O 0.005K 0.010
13/ ’9/01 013 00 0.570 0.140 0.110 0.005’ 0.010
73/10/02 OM 20 ).8 40 0.?45 0.032 0.005K 0.010
73/11/07 09 1- 0.770 0.350 v.028 0.005K 0.005K
73/12/11 10 50 1.520 0.300 0.020 0.005K 0.005K
7 ’ ./i,1/j? 11 ‘ .5 i.730 0.700 . 172 0.008 0.D3 ,
7’./01/?h C 15 .39O 0. 100K 0.056 0.005K 0.025
74/c /12 0 5c 0.58u 0.300 0.110 C.010 0.010
74/0 /2H OR 45 3.570 0.500 0.1 .u 0.005 0.04ü
K V . LU [ KNOWN TO tIE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
51 )r ET ET 1EVAL DATr 7b/07/22
JiOSul
33 20 00.0 087 2’. 30.0 4
p’JUE , CREEK
01 tUSCALOOsA CU ‘4A
t/r4OLT LOCPS DAM 033991
t U( 4EAN f-1O LLS FI$rIING CAMP
11t ALt S 211120z+
OuOO FELT OE Ti-i CLASS J0
C3630 00625 0 o6 10 00671 00655
DATE TI iE DEPTh-4 NO NO3 TOT KJFL Nt-13—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
Fr OM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
To DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/04/11 13 ?5 0.1S. O.M60 0.082 0.005K
73/ .,5/07 ii ?0 (.320 2.310 0.120 0.018 u.020
73/)5/31 1() ‘0 0.399 0.310 3.150 0.005K 0.010
73/t /28 07 00 0.550 0.280 C.048 0.005K 0.015
73/yb/Ok 09 00 3.570 0.315 .138 fl.OC SK 0.u07
73/ 1Y/01 10 4 0.420 0.100K C.091 0.005K 0 ,0 0 5K
73/i J/0? 09 35 0.590 O.2 ’O ( .075 0.0C5r 0.010
73/11/07 10 Ic 1.080 0.250 0.017 0.005K 0.007
73/I?/11 ii c 1.2bu 0.400 0.020 0.00 5K 0.00 5K
7’4/O1/0 19 7 , 0.200 0.500 j.072 0.008 0.020
74/( I/i? 12 45 J.0b0 0.400 0.036 0.005K 0.015
74/ 1/?5 09 50 v.132 0.100K 0.040 0.005K 0.010
7L / 2/1 10 4S 0.23d 0.100K C.06 0 0.00 5K 0.005K
7’+/02/2H 09 10 0.132 0.300 0.055 0.005K 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATt 76/07/22
01 05E1
33 23 e 0.0 0 j, 24 30.0 4
DAVIS C’ ELIc
01 TUSCALOOSO Co MA
T/HULT LOCK . DAM
CO HWY 59 13R06 2.5
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
(nj ,33
00625
0j610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO NO3
TOT KJEL
NHI—N
PHOS—DIS
PrIOS—TOT
FPOM
O
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTr4O
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
‘IG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
0339 1
MI NE OF ANTIOCH CHUM
2111204
CLASS 00
73/0 ./11
11
20
0.160
2.520
0.110
0.005K
0.030
73/05/07
09
50
0.231
0.815
0.050
0.005K
0.005K
73/05/31
11
00
0.231
1.540
0.126
0.010
0.025
73/06/28
07
35
0.189
0.220
0.021
0.005K
0. O lu
7i/0t3/01
09
30
0.490
0.1’O
0.048
0.005K
0.010
7j/ 9/01
11
30
0.350
0.170
0.035
0.005K
0.005K
73/10/0
10
30
0.180
0.540
0.154
0.005K
0.045
73/11/07
10
35
1.500
0.400
0.025
0.005K
0.010
73/12/ti
11
3-,
1.700
0.600
0.016
0.005K
0.010
74/.fl/j,7
13
20
(‘.136
0. O0
0.032
0.005K
0.035
7z+/01/?h
10
10
0.160
0.109K
0.036
0.005K
0.015
7’./u2/12
11
21)
0.480
0.701)
0.150
0.010
0.020
74/02/28
09
O
0.540
0.4)0
0.105
0.015
0.0 O
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
sTu ET ETkJEvAL DATE 76/07/22
o i 05F 1
33 27 15.0 0M7 3’. 35.0 4
bL Jt. C ’EEI<
01 TUSCALOOSA CO MA
T/riC)LT LOCpc & DAM 033992
(.0 HWY 47 8 DG SW OF SPENCFI HILL CHIJkCrI
I1FPALES 21 112o ’ .
3000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 0)610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—i)IS PHOS—TOT
F O i 0F N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L WilL M&/L P WilL
73/04/08 10 35 0.030 3.150 0.078 0.006 0.025
73/ J5/04 11 40 0.034 2.650 0.220 0.005K 0.020
73/0o/03 09 45 0.036 0.570 0.052 0.007 0.025
73/07/08 12 00 0.600 0.500 3.180 0.005K 0.015
73/08/03 15 15 0.026 0.140 0.012 0.005K 0.025
73/09/07 15 ( 5 0.010 c 0.190 0.024 0.005K 0.020
73/10/07 14 30 .u37 0.585 •J.046 0.005 s 0.020
73/11/04 11 50 0.0 10K 0.250 C.039 0.005K 0.015
73/I2/IP 11 15 u.028 0.590 0.044 0.005K 0.010
74/01/06 13 35 C..044 0.500 0.012 0.005K 0.010
74/01/21 10 15 .072 0.100K .044 0.005K 0.025
7’./02/12 14 ?O 0.060 0.1001 < 0.010 0.0051 < 0.010
74/O /15 1? 30 0.044 0.503 0.050 0.005 0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO E
LLSS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY lIES IN 1974
STATE OF ALABAMA
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USEU IN ANKlNGS
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
INO G N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CrtLUF A
1 —
MIN UO
MEDiAN
DISS O Tr1O
0101
BANKHEAD LAKE
0.029
0.770
452.667
‘ ..D 17
14.900
0.007
0103
GANTI ESERVO1
0.029
0.300
465.778
2.144
14.000
0.008
0104
GUNTERSVILLE ESERVO1P
0.044
0.480
461.111
8.567
12.200
0.01’.
0105
HOLT LOCK AND JAM
0.018
0.835
449.417
2.183
13.600
0.DOb
0106
LAY LAKE
0.075
0.390
470.778
7.056
13.OOo
0.032
0107
MA 1iN LAIcE
0.017
0.170
435.2 5cj
6.407
15.000
0.00’.
010.
MITCMELL LAKE
0.053
0.290
466.000
6.211
12.400
0.022
0109
PICKWICK LAKE
0.056
0.535
455.000
2.450
11.900
0.035
0112
WEISS PESERVOIR
0.092
0.260
478,389
11.261
14.900
0.034
0114
WILSON LAKE
0.053
0.460
447.71’.
7.400
10.200
0.022
0115
LAKE uRDY
0.049
0.170
437.889
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WIT’-t rIIGHER VALUES NUMB [ O LAI\ES .4ITH ,-1IC-HE V4LU S)
1 - MEDIAN INUEX
MIN . O DiS O T iO P NO
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
INOPG N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
C 1LO A
0101
I3 NKHEAD LAKE
75 C
7)
10
C 1)
60
C 6)
7
C
7)
25
)
8i)
C )
0103
GANTT RESERVOIp
75 C
7)
b0 5)
30
C 3)
100
C
10)
40
( 4)
70
C 7)
3 u
0104
GUNTERSV ILLE RESERVOIR
60 C
6)
30 C 3)
40 C 4)
20
C
2)
0
C 8)
55 C 5)
375
0105
MOLT LOCK AND DAM
90 (
9)
0 ( 0)
70 C 7)
90
C
9)
50 C 5)
90 C 9)
2db
010€
LAY LAKE
10 C
1)
50 ( 5)
10 C 1)
40
C
‘.)
60 C 6)
20 C 2)
0107
MARTIN LAKE
100 C
10)
95 C 9)
100 ( 10)
SO
(
5)
5 C 0)
tOO C 10)
190
0108
MITCI-IELL LAKE
40 C
4)
70 C 7)
20 C
2)
60
C
6)
70 C 7)
35 C
3)
450
0109
PICKWICK LAKE
20 C
2)
20 C
2)
SO C
5)
80
C
d)
90 C
9)
0 C
0)
29b
0112
WEISS RESERVOIR
0 C
0)
80 (
8)
0 C
0)
10
C
1)
25 C
2)
10 C
1)
260
125
0114
WILSON LAKE
C
0115 LAKE PCJRD’r
50 C 5) 95 ( 9) 90 C 9) 0 C 0) 5 C 0) 55 C 5) 295
-------
LAKES RANKED BY IMDE NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 0107 MARTIN LAKE 450
2 0105 MOLT LOCK AND DAM 39j
3 0103 GANTT RESERVOiR 375
4 0101 BANKHEAD LAKE 320
5 0114 WILSON LAKE
b 0115 LAKE PURDY 295
7 0108 MITCHELL LAKE 295
8 0104 GIJNTERSVILLE RESERVOIR 285
9 0109 PICKwICK LAKE 260
10 0106 LAY LAKE 190
11 0112 WEISS RESERVOIR 125
------- |