U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CHATUGE LAKE
TOWS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND
CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 286
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
il GPO—697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
CHATUGE LAKE
TOWNS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND
CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 286
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
GEORGIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword
List of Georgia Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Sumary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, infor,iiation on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point—source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and 3O5(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
AC KNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Georgia Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the
Georgia National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Joe D. Tanner, Commissioner of the Department of Natural
Resources; J. Leonard Ledbetter, Director of the Environmental
Protection Division; Ralph S. Howard, Jr., Environmental Affairs
Coordinator; Gene B. Welsh, Chief of the Water Protection Branch;
Edward T. Hall, Jr., Unit Coordinator; and Broughton A. Caldwell,
R. Marshall Gaddis, William D. Kennedy, and Kenneth W. Martin,
Environmental Specialists, provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary lake reports,
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Joel B. Paris, III, then the Adjutant General of
Georgia, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel .John R. Ranier, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Georgia National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assista 1ce to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF GEORGIA
LAKE NAME
Allatoona
Blackshear
Blue Ridge
Burton
Chatuge
Clark Hill
Harding
Hartwel 1
High Falls
Jackson
Nottely
Seminole
Sidney Lanier
Sinclair
Walter F. George
COUNTY
Bartow, Cherokee, Cobb
Crisp, Dooly, Lee, Sumpter,
Worth
Fanni n
Rabun
Towns, GA; Clay, NC
Columbia, Elbert, Lincoln,
McDuffie, Wilks, GA;
Abbeville, McCormick, SC
Harris, GA; Chambers, Lee, AL
Franklin, Hart, Stephens, GA;
Anderson, Oconee, Pickens, SC
Butts, Lamar, Monroe
Butts, Jasper, Newton
Union
Decatur, Seminole, GA;
Jackson, FL
Dawson, Forsyth, Gwinnett,
Hall, Lunipkin
Baldwin, Hancock, Putnam
Clay, Quitman, Stewart, GA;
Barbour, Henry, Russell, AL
-------
V
-------
CHATUGE LAKE*
STORET 40. 1303
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Chatuge Lake is mesotrophic. Of the
14 lakes and reservoirs sampled in Georgia, Chatuge Lake ranked
third using a combination of six parameters as an index to over-
all quality**. Two of the lakes had less median total phosphorus,
four had less and two had the same median dissolved phosphorus,
two had less median inorganic nitrogen, four had less mean chloro-
phyll a, and only one had a greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
During their visits to the lake, Survey limnologists did not
observe any nuisance conditions. However, dissolved oxygen was
depressed with depth (at and below 5 to 6 meters) at all sampling
stations in June and was essentially depleted below 9 meters at
stations 1, 2, 3, and 4 in September.
B. Rate—Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate Chatuge Lake was phosphorus
limited at the time the assay sample was collected. Lake data
also indicate phosphorus limitation for the June, 1973, sampling
as well as the September, 1973, sampling (i.e., the mean N/P
ratios were 19/1 and greater, and phosphorus limitation would be
expected). However, the November, 1973, lake sampling data
* Table of metric conversions--Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
2
indicate a nitrogen limited condition (i.e., the mean N/P
ratio was 8/1, and nitrogen limitation would be expected).
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The phosphorus load from the only known
point source was 4.2% of the total reaching the lake during the
sampling year. Phosphorus reduction at the Hiawassee wastewater
treatment plant would not appreciably change the loading rate of
0.39 g/m 2 /yr (see page 15). However, any future increase in
point-source loading should be carefully evaluated due to the
existing high quality of Chatuge Lake.
2. Non-point sources--The phosphorus loads from non-point
sources accounted for 95.8% of the total reaching the lake during
the sampling year. The gaged tributaries contributed a total of
74.8% and ranged from 24.6% (Hiwassee River) to 3.6% (Fodder
Creek). The ungaged tributaries were estimated to have con-
tributed 16.4% of the total.
The phosphorus export rates of the sampled tributaries ranged
from 15 to 25 kg/krn 2 /yr with a mean of 22 kg/km 2 /yr (see page 15).
These rates compare well with the export rates of tributaries to
nearby Blue Ridge Lake* (mean of 18 kg/km 2 /yr) and Nottely Reser-
voir** (mean of 20 kg/km 2 /yr).
* Working Paper No. 284.
** Working Paper NO. 291.
-------
In a recent Georgia Department of Natural Resources report
(Anonymous, 1973), the Hiwassee River was classified as "healthy"
at a station two miles upstream from Chatuge Lake; nutrient
concentrations at that time (08/10/72) were very low (NOz + NOa =
0.050 mg/1, NH3 = <0.020 mg/1, and P = <0.020 mg/1). On 08/05/73,
Survey concentrations at the same place were quite comparable
(N02 + N03 = 0.115 mg/1, NH3 = 0.013 mg/1, and total P = 0.015 mg/1),
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometryt:
1. Surface area: 28.94 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 10.6 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 36.9 meters.
4. Volume: 306.764 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 296 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries —
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km 2 )* ( m 3 /sec)*
Hiwassee River 119.1 3.8
Hog Creek 15.3 0.4
Fodder Creek 28.0 0.6
Shooting Creek 98.4 2.5
Bell Creek 20.7 0.5
Hightower Creek 85.0 2.1
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 94.0 2.1
Totals 460.5 12.0
2. Outlet -
Hiwassee River 489.5** 12.0
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 194.4 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 125.4 centimeters.
t Hall, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “...Survey Methods,
1973—l976 .
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Chatuge Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from six
stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station (see
maps page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 meters
or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the six stations
for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit (June, 1973), two 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were
composited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample
was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The
maximum depths sampled were 31.7 meters at station 1, 20.1 meters at
station 2, 30.5 meters at station 3, 24.4 meters at station 4, 13.7 meters
at station 5, and 5.2 meters at station 6.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix D, and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMAI Y OF P 4YS1CAL ANt) CHEMICAL C $ARACTERISTICS FOP CHATUGE LA cE
STORET CODE 1303
1ST SAMPLING ( 6/29/73) 2ND SAMPLING I 9/12/73) 3RD SAMPLING (11/10/73)
SUES 6 SITES 6 SITES
PA AMETFQ RANGF ) EAN MEDIAN PANC,E MEAN MEDIAN RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
TF iP C) 13.2 — 27.0 21.4 22.1 16.9 — 27.7 23.1 23.5 12.7 — 15.8 15.0 15.4
)ISS O Y (MG/LI ?.6 - 17.4 6.9 6.9 0.1 — N.2 4.2 4.2 5.4 — 9.4 7.8 8.0
CNDCTVY (MCPOMO co. - 50. 50. 50. IS. — 38. 23. 23. 15. — 21. 19. 20.
PM (STA JO (‘NITS) 5.9 - 8.5 6.4 .9 5.5 — 6.9 6.0 6.0 6.2 — 7.3 6.5 6.4
TOT ALK (MG/LI 10. — I D. 10. 10. 10. — 14. 11. 10. 10. — 10. 10. 10.
TOT P (MC,/L) 0.007 — 0.070 0.014 0.012 0.005 — 0.027 0.018 0.021 0.010 — 0.049 0.017 0.015
ORTHO P (MG/I) 0.002 — 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.00’. — 0.011 0.006 0.006 0.006 — 0.018 0.013 0.013
N02.NO1 (MG/LI 0.040 — 0.190 0.09? 0.080 0.020 — 0.140 0.054 0.030 0.030 — 0.050 0.036 0.035
AMMONIA (MG/I) 0.030 — O.25G o.oqi 0.070 0.020 — 0.200 0.058 0.040 0.040 — 0.130 0.069 0.070
KJEL N (MG/I) 0.200 — 0.Q00 0.303 0.300 0.200 — 0.600 0.289 0.200 0.200 — 0.300 0.207 0.200
IND9G 1 ( G/L) 0.040 — 0.340 0.I7R 0.I55 0.040 — 0.230 0.112 0.090 0.070 — 0.170 0.104 0.100
TOTAL N 1MG/LI 0.240 - 0.940 0.400 0.360 0.220 — 0.630 0.342 0.330 0.230 — 0.350 0.243 0.235
CHL DYL A (IIC./L) .‘ , - IS. 6.6 5.4 4.7 — 6.6 5.8 6.0 2.9 — 15.9 6.6 5.0
SFC’CNI (MEIrDS) ‘.‘. - 5. ) 4... 4.7 1.6 — 5.0 3.1 2.7 1.2 — 1.8 1.5 1.4
-------
7
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Algal units
Date Genera per ml
06/29/73 1. Oscillatoria 322
2. Dinoflagellates 231
3. Tabellarla 131
4. Asterionella 70
5. Roya (?) 70
Other genera 261
Total 1 ,085
09/12/73 1. Lyngbya 1,859
(stations 1, 2, & 3)2. Chroococcus 1,180
3. Tabellarla 400
4. Aphanizomenon 140
5. Aphanocapsa 140
Other genera 479
Total 4,198
09/12/73 1. Lyngbya 1,935
(stations 4, 5, & 6) 2. Tabellaria 630
3. Aphanlzomenon 557
4. Melosira 235
5. Chlamydomonas 117
Other genera 381
Total 3,855
11/10/73 1. Anabaena 303
2. Melosira 288
3. Centric diatoms 80
4. Peridinium 32
5. Dinobryon 32
Other genera 95
Total 830
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling
Date
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
05
06
01
02
03
04
05
06
01
02
03
04
05
06
Chlorophyll a
(pg/i)
15.3
3.8
5.1
4.0
7.1
2.5
6.6
6.3
5.9
5.2
6.1
4.7
15.9
3.6
2.9
3.9
6.2
7.0
Spike (mg/i )
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/l )
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
06/29 or 30/73
09/12 or 17/73
11/10/73
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Stations 1, 2, and 3 -
a. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Control
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.025
0.050
1.0 N
P
P
P
P + 0.5 N
P + 1.0 N
0.013
0.176
0.1
0.023
0.176
0.1
0.033
0.176
1.1
0.063
0.176
1.2
0.038
0.676
2.5
0.063
1.176
12.0
0.013
1.176
0.1
-------
9
b. Filtered and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/i )
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.025 P + 0.5 N
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.007
0.017
0.027
0.057
0.032
0.057
0.007
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.129
0.129
0.129
0.129
0.629
1.129
1.129
Maximum yield
mg/1-dry wt. )
0.1
0.3
1.0
1.8
1.9
10.3
0.1
2. Stations 4, 5, and 6 -
a. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/i )
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.025 P + 0.5 N
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.035
0.060
0.010
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.173
0.173
0.173
0.173
0.673
1.173
1.173
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
0.1
0.2
0.4
2.2
5.1
15.7
0.1
b. Filtered and nutrient spiked
Spike (mg/i )
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.025 P + 0.5 N
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.004
0.014
0.024
0.054
0.029
0.054
0.004
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.114
0.114
0.114
0.114
0.614
1.114
1.114
Maximum yield
( mg/i—dry wt. )
0.1
0.2
0.9
1.3
3.1
8.1
0.1
-------
10
3. Discussion —
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Chatuge Lake was low at the time of sample collection.
Both assays, filtered only and autoclaved-filtered, demon-
strated increasing yields with increasing concentrations of
orthophosphorus indicating that this lake was limited by
phosphorus at that time. Note that the addition of only
nitrogen resulted in yields not significantly different
from those of the controls.
The lake data also indicate Chatuge Lake was phosphorus
limited at the time the algal assay sample was collected
(June, 1973); the mean ratio of inorganic nitrogen to dis-
solved phosphorus was greater than 50/1. Lake data also
indicate a phosphorus limited condition during the September,
1973, sampling. However, the lake data indicate nitrogen
limitation during the November, 1973, sampling; the mean
N/P ratio was 8/1, and nitrogen limitation would be expected.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Georgia National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of January and February when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in March, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the Georgia District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were calcu—
lated from mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows. Nutrient
loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ”
of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean concentrations at stations
A-i , B-i, C-i, D—l, E-l, and F—i and the mean annual ZZ flow.
The City of Hiawassee did not participate in the Survey, and nu-
trient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* —
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment ( m 3 /d) Water
Hiawassee 405 act. sludge 189.25 Chatuge Lake
2. Known industrial** - None
* Nations, 1973.
** Anonymous, 1972.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Hiwassee River 2,720 24.0
Hog Creek 315 2.8
Fodder Creek 410 3.6
Shooting Creek 2,320 20.5
Bell Creek 490 4.3
Hightower Creek 2,160 19.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,870 16.5
c. Known municipal -
Hiawassee 460 4.1
d. Septic tanks* - 70 0.6
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Direct precipitation** — 505 4.5
Total 11,320 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Hiwassee River 8,000
3. Net annual P accumulation - 3,320 kg.
* Estimate based on 250 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgN/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load)
Hiwassee River 67,735 25.6
Hog Creek 5,195 2.0
Fodder Creek 9,405 3.6
Shooting Creek 59,020 22.3
Bell Creek 10,180 3.8
Hightower Creek 38,880 14.7
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 38,850 14.7
c. Known municipal -
Hiawassee 1,375 0.5
d. Septic tanks* - 2,665 1.0
e. Known industrial - None - -
f. Direct precipitation** - 31,240 11.9
Total 264,545 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Hiwassee River 188,910
3. Net annual N accumulation - 75,635 kg.
* Estimate based on 250 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
0. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary k g P/km 2 /yr g N/km 2 /yr
Hiwassee River 23 569
Hog Creek 21 340
Fodder Creek 15 336
Shooting Creek 24 600
Bell Creek 24 492
Hightower Creek 25 457
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus ____________________
Total Accumulated
0.11
Total
Accumulated
9.1
2.6
grams/m 2 /yr 0.39
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Chatuge Lake:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 0.70
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.35
-------
16
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1972. Georgia municipal and industrial wastewater
treatment facilities associated with reservoirs. GA Dept. of
Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1973. Water quality investigation of the Tennessee River
basin in Georgia. GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1974. Water quality monitoring data for Georgia streams,
1973; volume 3. GA Dept. 0 f Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Hall, Edward T., 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Nations, Carlos (Supt.), 1973. Treatment plant questionnaire
(Hiawassee STP). Hiawassee, GA.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
17
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x l0 = acre feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.3 15 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES
RANK
RANKED BY
LAKE CODE
INDEX NOS.
LAKE NAME
1 1316
2 1318
3 1303
4 1311
5 1310
6 1304
7 1301
8 1302
9 1313
1312
1319
1314
1309
1317
524
523
424
393
385
309
286
284
254
253
192
184
116
77
INDEX NO
BLUE RIDGE LAKE
BURTON LAKE
CHATUGE LAKE
NOTTELY RESERVOIR
LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
ALLATOONA RESERVOIR
BLACKSHEAR LAKE
SINCLAIR LAKE
LAKE SEMINOLE
HIGH FALLS LAKE
LAKE EUFAULA
JACKSON LAKE
LAKE HARDING
10
11
12
13
14
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WIT, HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEX
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CHLORA MIN DO DISS P NO
1301 ALLATOONA RESERVOIR 62 ( 8) 54 ( 7) ‘.6 ( 6) 31 ( 4) 31 ( 0) 62 ( 7) 286
1302 BLACKSI-$EAR LAKE 38 ( 5) 31 ( 4) 0 C 0) 100 C 13) 100 C 13) 15 C 2) 284
1303 CHATUGE LAKE 85 ( 1)) 85 C 11) 92 ( 12) 69 ( 9) 31 ( 0) 62 C 7) 424
130’. CLARK HILL RESERVOIR 54 ( 7) 62 ( 8) 62 C 8) 54 C 7) 31 ( 0) 46 C 6) 309
1309 JACKSON LAKE 8 ( 1) 8 ( 1) 15 C 2) 8 C 1) 69 ( 9) 8 ( 1) 116
1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER 69 ( 9) 46 ( 6) 77 ( 10) 77 ( 10) 31 C 0) 85 ( 10) 385
1311 NOTTELY RESERVOIR 17 C 10) 69 C 9) 69 ( 9) 62 C 8) 31 ( 0) 85 C 10) 393
1312 LAKE SEMINOLE 31 ( 4) 15 C 2) 38 C 5) 46 ( 6) 92 C 12) 31 C 4) 253
1313 SINCLAIR LAKE 46 ( 6) 38 C 5) 54 ( 7) 23 ( 3) 31 1 0) 62 ( 7) 254
1314 LAKE EUFAULA 15 C 2) 23 ( 3) 31 1 4) 15 C 2) 77 C 10) 23 C 3) 184
1316 bLUE RIDGE LAKE 92 C 12) 92 C 12) 85 ( 11) 85 ( 11) 85 C 11) 85 C 10) 524
1317 LAKE HARDING 0 C 0) 0 C 0) 8 C 1) 38 C 5) 31 I 0) 0 ( 0) 77
1318 BURTON LAKE 100 C 13) 100 ( 13) 100 C 13) 92 1 12) 31 ( 0) 100 1 13) 523
1319 HIGH FALLS LAKE 23 C 3) 77 ( 10) 23 C 3) 0 ( 0) 31 C 0) 38 C 5) 192
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDiAN
IN0r 6 N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CHLORA
15—
MIN 00
MEDIAN
DISS P
1301
ALLATOONA RESE VOIR
0.020
0.150
443.167
7.489
14.900
0.005
1302
BLACKSHEAR LAKE
0.035
0.250
468.091
1.855
11.700
0.014
1303
CHATUGE LAKE
0.014
0.110
382.778
6.339
14.900
0.005
1304
CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
0.024
0.150
439.250
6.715
14.900
0.007
1309
JACKSON LAKE
0.094
0.530
461.385
14.577
14.800
0.027
1310
LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
0.016
0.180
396.417
5.431
14.900
0.004
1311
NOTTELY RESERVOIR
0.015
0.130
405.667
6.656
14.900
0.004
1312
LAKE SEMINOLE
0.040
0.405
456.133
6.760
11.800
0.010
1313
SINCLAIR LAKE
0.028
0.230
440.667
8.006
14.900
0.005
1314
LAKE EUFAULA
0.048
0.345
457.667
9.083
14.400
0.011
1316
BLUE RIDGE LAKE
0.010
0.105
394.889
3.078
13.000
0.004
1317
LAKE HARDING
0.114
0.640
467.538
7.438
14.900
0.045
1318
BURTON LAKE
0.007
0.100
363.889
2.733
14.900
0.003
1319
HIGH FALLS LAKE
0.047
0.115
459.444
15.075
14.900
0.009
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW 1NFO MAT1ON FOR GEORGIA 12/2/75
LAKE CODE 1303 CHATUGE LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE (SO KM) 489.5
SUB-Di AINAGE NOI MALIZED FLOWS(CMSI
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KH) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
13 03A1 15.3 0.51 0.51 0.57 0.51 0.42 0.28 0.31 0.25 0.20 0.14 0.17 0.42 0.36
130381 119.1 4.62 5.72 6.20 5.66 4.28 3.31 2.66 2.44 2.04 2.10 2.63 3.54 3.75
1303d2 489.5 9.88 10.08 7.67 14.10 13.93 17.41 17.58 1T.50 14.95 5.86 4.76 11.13 12.08
1303C1 28.0 0.93 0.93 0.99 0.93 0.76 0.54 0.54 0.42 0.37 0.28 0.31 0.76 0.65
130301 98.4 3.48 4.30 4.25 3.77 2.66 2.18 1.81 1.61 1.22 1.22 1.61 2.44 2.54
1303E 1 20.7 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.68 0.54 0.40 0.40 0.31 0.28 0.20 0.23 0.57 0.47
1303F 1 85.0 2.63 3.28 3.48 3.23 2.46 1.90 1.53 1.39 1.16 1.19 1.53 2.04 2.14
13031Z 94.0 3.03 3.06 3.26 3.03 2.49 1.73 1.81 1.44 1.25 0.88 1.08 2.49 2.12
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 489.5 TOTAL FLOW IN = 144.87
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 460.5 TOTAL FLOW OUT = 144.87
NOTE 0*0 LAKE AREA .l1.2 SQ NI, NOT INCLUDED IN SUMS OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIHUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1303A1 3 73 0.88 10 0.71
4 73 0.74 14 0.59
5 73 1.05 12 0.79
6 73 0.68 9 1.19
7 73 0.48 14 0.34
8 73 0.34 5 0.21
9 73 0.22 9 0.14
10 73 0.11 6 0.12
11 73 0.22 10 0.09
I? 73 0.93 8 0.68
1 74 1.16 5 1.44 19 0.91
2 74 0.93 2 3.26 16 1.08
130381 3 73 9.63 10 7.02
4 73 8.30 14 o.09
5 73 10.42 12 7.56
6 73 8.07 9 10.25
7 73 3.99 14 4.02
8 73 3.28 5 2.80
9 73 2.21 9 2.12
10 73 1.61 6 1.81
11 73 3.31 10 1.47
12 73 7.82 8 6.68
1 74 10.51 S 11.75 19 8.21
2 74 10.36 2 21.29 16 9.40
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA 12/2/75
LAKE CODE 1303 CIIATUGE LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN PLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1303B2 3 73 12.06 10 11.95
4 73 9.23 14 0.40
5 73 25.94 12 23.64
6 73 23.59 9 24.21
7 73 15.74 14 2.35
8 73 16.23 5 0.41
9 73 15.46 9 19.23
10 73 8.72 6 0.08
11 73 15.55 10 10.42
12 73 26.25 8 24.24
1 74 35.68 5 27.75 19 42.19
2 74 32.56 2 26.11 16 37.38
1303C1 3 73 1.53 10 1.19
4 73 1.36 14 1.05
5 73 1.87 12 1.27
6 73 1.30 9 1.67
7 73 2.01 14 1.12
8 73 0.57 5 0.54
9 73 0.40 9 0.40
10 73 0.23 6 0.37
11 73 0.40 10 Q.?8
12 73 1.70 8 1.13
1 74 2.12 9 1.93 19 1.36
2 74 1.70 2 3.26 16 1.56
130301 3 73 6.57 10 5.10
4 73 5.49 14 4.25
5 73 6.48 12 5.66
6 73 5.32 9 7.36
7 73 2.72 14 2.58
8 73 2.18 5 1.64
9 73 1.33 9 1.16
10 73 1.22 6 0.96
11 73 2.04 10 0.74
12 73 5.38 8 4.81
1 74 7.93 5 9.34 19 6.23
2 74 7.79 2 19.54 16 7.22
1303E1 3 73 1.10 10 0.91
4 73 0.99 14 0.79
5 73 1.30 12 1.02
6 73 0.96 9 1.42
7 73 0.59 14 0.51
8 73 0.42 5 0.31
9 73 0.31 9 0.23
10 73 0.15 6 0.19
11 73 0.28 10 0.15
12 73 1.25 B 0.88
1 74 1.56 5 1.70 19 1.10
2 74 1.22 2 3.40 16 1.30
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA 12/2/75
LAKE CODE 1303 CHATUGE LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTr4 YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1303F1 3 73 5.41 10 3.96
4 73 4.70 14 3.40
5 73 6.00 12 4.25
6 73 4.62 9 5.52
7 73 2.29 14 2.35
8 73 1.87 5 1.64
9 73 1.27 9 1.27
10 73 0.91 6 1.10
11 73 1.93 10 0.91
12 73 4.50 8 3.68
1 74 6.00 5 6.37 19 4.53
2 74 5.95 2 11.33 16 5.24
1303 1Z 3 73 5.04
4 73 4.42
5 73 6.09
6 73 4.22
7 73 2.72
8 73 1.95
9 73 1.36
10 73 0.68
11 73 1.36
12 73 5.49
1 74 6.91
2 74 5.52
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
130301
35 00 43.0 083 47 10.0
CHATUGE LAKE
13 GEORGIA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0105 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL MO2 .NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL H H—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MC,/L INCHES MICRONHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/06/29 10 30 0000 26.6 ?16 50K 6.20 10K 0.060 0.900 0.040 0.002
10 30 0012 25.7 11.0 50K 8.30 10K 0.040 0.200K 0.060 0.003
10 10 0015 3.0 12.4 50K 8.50 10K 0.040 0.300 0.060 0.005
10 30 0025 19.0 6.8 50K 7.00 10K 0.060 0.400 0.060 0.003
10 30 0040 16.6 3.6 50K 6.20 10K 0.060 0.200 0.150 0.002
10 30 0075 13.9 6.0 50K 6.20 10K 0.070 0.200 0.160 0.003
10 30 0100 13.2 4.6 50K 6.20 10K 0.110 0.300 0.160 0.002
73/09/12 10 25 0000 27.3 198 1R 6.90 11 0.050 0.600 0.030 0.010
10 ?5 0005 27.1 7,8 ?2 6.50 10 0.030 0.300 0.030 0.007
10 ?S 0015 26.9 8.0 ?0 6.10 11 0.030 0.300 0.030 0.006
10 25 0030 22.8 4.0 17 5.90 10 0.060 0.200 0.050 0.006
10 25 0050 19.1 1.2 16 5.80 12 0.070 0.200K 0.080 0.011
10 25 0070 17.6 1.0 15 5.50 10 0.040 0.200K 0.140 0,007
10 25 0090 16.9 0.1 18 5.60 14 0.080 0.200K 0.100 0.005
73/11/10 09 40 0000 15.8 72 15 7.30 10K 0.090 0.300 0.050 0.018
09 40 0010 15.7 7.8 18 7.00 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.030 0.013
09 40 0025 15.8 7.6 18 6.90 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.030 0.014
09 40 0050 15.8 5,4 18 6.80 10K 0.070 0,200K 0.030 0.014
09 40 0075 15.6 7.0 18 6.70 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.030 0.015
09 40 0104 15.0 6.2 17 6.50 10K 0.130 0.200 0.040 0.015
K VALUE NO N () 3F LESS
T.- N I OICATF3
-------
STOPET RETPTFVAL DATE 74/11/ 6
130301
35 00 43.0 0 3 4? 10.0
C-4ATU(, LA’ E
13 ‘ E1J 1,TA
I1FPALFS 2111202
3 6105 FEET DEPTH
00 65 32217
DATE TIME: DFPTH PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
FROM A
TO DAY FEET MG/L ‘ UG/L
73/0f,/29 10 30 0000 0.012 15.3
10 30 0012 0.011
10 30 0015 0.015
10 30 0025 0.01 4
10 30 0040 0.00
10 30 0075 0.007
10 30 0100 0.009
73/09/1? 10 25 0000 0.0?5
10 25 0005 0.027
10 25 0015 0.0? ’ .
10 ?5 0030 0.02’
10 ?5 0050 °.025
10 25 0070 0.0??
10 25 0090 0.0?3
73/11/lU 09 40 0000 0.018
09 40 0010 0.015
09 40 0025 0.0 13
09 40 0050 0.013
09 40 0075 0.017
09 40 0104 0.049
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/?6
130302
35 00 45.0 083 45 20.0
CHATUGE LAKE
13 GEO G!A
1IEPALES 2111202
3 0070 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDIJCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2F.N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT ‘IG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/I MG/I MG/I MG/I P
73/06/30 10 45 0000 26.6 180 50K 7.30 10K 0.080 0.400 0.060 0.003
10 45 0005 26.5 8.0 50K 7.40 10K 0.090 0.200K 0.070 0.002
1’) 45 0012 26.4 8.0 50K 7.50 10K 0.060 0.200K 0.050 0.002
10 45 0015 22.9 9.7 50K 7.40 10K 0.090 0.200 0.140 0.002
10 45 0025 19.2 5.2 50K 6.40 10K 0.100 0.200K 0.140 0.002
10 45 0045 16.1 4.9 50K 6.30 10K 0.090 0.200K 0.190 0.003
10 45 0066 14.9 3.8 50K 6.30 10K 0.130 0.300 0.190 0.005
73/0 ).’12 11 05 0000 ?7.7 108 23 6.60 13 0.030 0.200K 0.030 0.007
11 05 0005 27.5 6.8 24 6.20 12 0.040 0.200K 0.030 0.005
11 05 0015 26.7 8.2 23 6.00 13 0.030 0.200 0.030 0.005
11 05 0025 ?3.5 4.4 21 5.70 13 0.070 0.200K 0.080 0.004
11 05 0040 20.6 1.4 21 5.70 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.070 0.006
11 oc 0060 IR.4 0.1 30 5.70 13 0.160 0.200 0.070 0.004
73/11/10 09 00 0000 15.7 4R 20 6.50 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.040 0.013
09 00 0010 15.7 7.6 21 6.40 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.040 0.014
09 00 0025 15.7 7.6 20 6.40 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.040 0.014
09 00 0040 15.7 8.0 20 6.5 ( 1 10K 0.070 0.300 0.040 0.015
09 00 005H 15.5 8.0 20 6.40 10K 0.070 0.200 0.040 0.014
‘< VI LUF r’J’JOWN T’) F L S
ti- a4 I’ DICPTFD
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL PATE 74/11/ 6
130 31) 2
35 00 45.1) 0P3 45 20.0
CrIATUGE LA c .
13
I 1I PALES
3
2111202
0070 FEET DEPTH
DATF
F OM
TO
T IME
OF
DAY
(i066S 32217
DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
A
FEET MG/L “ ic.’I.
73/06/30
10
45
0000
0.008
10
45
0005
0.007
10
45
0012
0.007
10
45
0015
0.073
10
45
0025
0.013
10
45
0045
0.013
10
45
0066
0.024
73/09/k?
11
11
11
11
11
11
05
05
05
05
05
05
0000
0005
u01S
0025
0040
0060
t.0?1
0.0?
‘ .0?3
0.023
0.022
0.02?
73/11/10
09
09
09
09
09
00
00
00
00
00
0000
0010
0025
0040
OOSP
0.C17
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.01
‘.3
3.5
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
130303
34 59 43.0 083 47 06.0
CHATIJGE LAKE
13 GEORGIA
11EPALES 2111202
3 0105 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNr)UCTVY PM T ALK NM3-N TOT KJEL NO2M’103 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICPOMHO SI) MG/L M&/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/06/30 09 55 0000 26.4 234 50K 7.30 10K 0.100 0.400 0.060 0.004
09 55 0005 26.4 7.8 50K 7.40 10K 0.060 0.300 0.050 0.004
09 55 0012 26.4 8.0 50K 7.90 10K 0.060 0.300 0.050 0.003
09 55 0020 21.4 11.4 50K 8.00 10K 0.080 0.400 0.070 0.002
09 55 0060 15.3 5.4 50K 6.20 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.150 0.002
09 55 0100 13.2 .9 50K 6.20 10K 0.220 0.300 0.160 0.004
73/09/12 11 30 0000 27.5 168 22 6.30 10K 0.030 0.300 0.030 0.005
11 30 0005 27.4 7.6 2? 6.10 10K 0.020 0.200K 0.020 0.006
11 30 0015 ?7.2 7.7 21 6.30 10K 0.020 0.200K 0.020 0.007
11 30 0030 22.4 3.4 18 5.70 10K 0.060 0.200K 0.070 0.006
I I 30 0045 20.4 1.4 18 5.70 12 0.050 0.200K 0.100 0.006
11 30 0065 17.8 0.2 19 5.50 10K 0.050 0.200K 0.120 0.007
I.) 30 0080 17.? 0.1 24 5.70 10 0.100 0.200K 0.070 0.005
71/11/10 09 30 0000 15.6 60 20 6.30 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.030 0.012
09 30 0010 15.6 5.6 20 6.40 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.030 0.012
09 30 0025 15.5 7.8 20 6.50 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.030 0.014
09 30 0050 15.5 8.0 20 6.40 10K 0.070 0.200K 0.030 0.012
09 30 0082 15.3 8.0 20 6.30 10K 0.080 0.200K 0.040 0.006
K / L1JrT P’IIOLIN TO r E L’ESS
1—i:iNI I \DICt T .)
-------
ST0 ET i TP1EVAL DATE 74/1l/?6
73/06/30 09 55 000 (1
09 55 0005
09 55 001?
09 55 O0?0
09 55 0060
09 55 0100
73/119/12 11 30 0000
I I 30 0005
11 30 0015
11 30 0030
11 30 0045
11 30 0065
11 30 0080
73/11/10 09 30 0000
09 30 0010
09 30 0025
09 30 0050
09 30 0082
0 )665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
A
MG/L P
0.007
U. OOR
1) • 0 1 2
fJ .013
0.009
.023
0.021
0.021
0.022
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.02?
0.014
0.012
0.014
0.017
0.019
110303
34 59 43.0 083 47 06.0
CH TUGE LAYE
13 6EOP G1A
I IEr’ALES 2111202
0105 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
3
5.1
2.9
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
130304
3’. 58 23.0 083 46 15.0
CIOTUGE LAIIE
11251 GEONGIA
LIEPALES 2111202
3 0083 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00017 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE lIME DEPTH WATER DO T- NSP CMOUCTVY PH T ALK WN3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS-DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI TELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/I INCHES MICROMMO SU MG/I MG/L MG/I MC,/L Mf,/L P
71/06/29 IS 20 0000 27.0 191 501< 6.90 IOr( 0.080 0.300 0.100 0.0021<
IS 20 0012 26.7 8.8 501< 7.10 101< 0.060 0.300 0.050 0.0021<
(5 20 0020 21.4 8.4 501< 6.90 101< 0.070 0.300 0.070 0.0021<
IS 70 0025 19.5 6.0 501< 6.00 101< 0.060 0.200 0.120 0.0021<
15 20 0040 16.7 5.4 501< ‘0.90 lOX 0.080 0.300 0.180 0.005
(5 20 0060 15.0 4.8 501< 5.90 101< 0.100 0.300 0.150 0.003
IS 20 0080 13.9 2.6 501< 6.20 101< 0.250 0.400 0.130 0.0021<
73/09/I? 14 05 0000 25.9 108 26 6.4T 101< 0.040 0.500 0.030 0.009
14 05 0005 25.9 25 6.30 101< 0.030 0.400 0.020 0.007
14 05 0020 25.6 7.4 24 6.20 101< 0.030 0.500 0.020 0.007
14 05 0030 72.7 3.2 24 5.80 101< 0.080 0.400 0.070 0.006
14 05 0045 70.7 1.2 23 5.70 101< 0.060 0.300 0.120 0.004
14 05 0060 18.7 0.1 28 5.80 II 0.120 0.100 0.050 0.008
14 05 0075 17.9 0.1 38 6.00 13 0.200 0.200 0.0201< 0.004
73/11/10 09 50 0000 15.2 53 21 6.40 10K 0.070 0.2001< 0.030 0.012
09 50 0010 15.2 8.8 21 6.40 101< 0.050 0.2001< 0.040 0.006
09 50 0025 15.1 8.0 21 6.30 101< 0.060 0.2001< 0.030 0.013
09 50 0050 15.1 8.0 21 6.30 101< 0.070 0.2001< 0.030 0.013
09 50 0073 14.7 8.0 21 6.30 101< 0.070 0.2001< 0.050 0.006
00665 32217
DATE TIME OEPT 4 PHOS—Tol CHLRPIIYL
rpOu OF a
TO DAY FEET M( /L P
71/06/29 15 70 0000 0.000 4.0
(5 70 0012 0.009
IS 20 0020 0.017
IS 20 0025 0.0 IS
15 20 0040 0.010
IS 20 0060 0.011
IS 70 0000 0.016
71/09/I? 14 05 0000 0.013 5.?
14 05 000 0.0 12
14 Os 0020 0.0 12
14 CS 0030 0.036
14 00 0040 0.01,5
14 05 0060 0.013
14 05 0075 0.0 1’.
71/11/10 09 50 0000 0.014 3.0
09 50 0010 0.014
09 50 0025 0.013
09 SO 0050 ).014
09 50 0071 0.037
V .L ’- . I I.i L S
l—’ ’ I 1r ’Tr
-------
51) . ET Q T0f(va ’. OATE 74/11/26
13)3 1)5
34 St 56.0 033 45 49.)
C-.ATUGE LAI(E
I3? 1 GEO G14
1It ALES 21)1202
3 OO ’ .8 FEET 0€PTP4
‘ 19 30)00 00077 000’)’ 00400 00410 006)0 00625 00630 0067)
DATE ITWE IE T— .ATC 00 T a ’ ..s C iOuCTvv 7 *L ’ ‘ lM3—N TOT k. L N024N03 P lOS—QJS
)u ) TrMP 5E .1 F1 L) CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL 001P43
TI .a1 FF.ET CENT “GIL 1 4CN S 1C OMe40 SU 1 46/L MG/L 46 11 WGIL IG/L P
73/JF,/24 I’. 30 0900 26.4 197 50 7. )) 10k 0.060 1.500 0.040 0.002
I ’. 10 0.310 26.7 e.o 50k 6.41) 10k 41.060 0.300 0.040 0.00?
I ’ 39 .3015 23. .a . 50k 6.’)) 10k 0.080 0.200 0.09I 0.002t(
1’ 30 0031) 19.) 6. ’ . 50” 6.20 10k 0.050 0.200 0.000 0.002 k
14 30 0945 16.2 5.2 50K 6.10 10k 0.09* 0.200 0.140 0.002k
73/09/17 1’. 30 0000 25.6 90 23 6.30 10k 0.040 0.500 0.020 0.015
14 30 0005 25.5 7.0 25 6.? 10k 0.040 0.410 0.020 0.004
14 30 0015 25.2 7.4 25 6.30 10k 0.040 1.400 0.020 0.004
14 30 0025 23.3 5.2 24 5.90 10k 0.08S 0.301 0.060 0.105
14 30 0035 21.7 6.2 23 6.00 10K 0.090 0.300 0.080 0.014
73/11/10 I I 30 01)00 1’..’ 52 20 6.40 10k 0.050 0.2 00k 0.030 l.IIZ
I I 30 0010 14.3 0.0 19 6.40 10 0.04* 0.200k 0.030 1.012
II 30 01)23 I ’.2 8.0 18 6.20 10k 0.050 0.200k 0.040 •.SS1
Il 30 0036 14.0 8.6 19 6.40 Ilk 0.061 0.200K 0.SM 1.11 1
0C665 32217
DATE Tf E 0E T ’4 P ,OS -T9T C ”LPP$4Y1
o’ o &
TO OAT ’ FEET “GIL JG/L
71/96/29 I ’ 30 000’) C.0 )9 7.1
I’ 10 00 )9 0.097
14 30 0015 0.016
14 10 Ł030 .).014
I’. 30 0045 3.019
73 /09/ Il 14 30 00 ,0 0.01)0 6.1
1’ 10 0005 0.007
I’ 30 0015 ‘).0 7
I’ . 30 0025 u.01l
I’. 30 9)35 3.010
73/I l/ i) II 30 0000 9.011
11 30 C910 ).0 13
II 10 0.)29 0.0))
II 30 1)036 0.C?’.
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
130306
34 55 29.0 033 44 00.0
CPIATUGE LAKE
13281 GEORGIA
I 1EPALES 2111202
3 0020 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00600 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEI N02&N03 PHOS-DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCt-41 FIELD CACO3 IOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
To DAY FEET CENT IG/L INCHES M ICROMHO SO M / MG/I MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/06/29 11 50 0000 26.7 101 50K 6.90 10K 0.060 0.400 0.070 0.003
11 50 0005 26.6 8.0 50K 6.90 10K 0.040 0.300 0.040 0.002
11 50 0010 26.2 7.4 50K 6.90 10K 0.060 0.300 0.050 0.002
11 50 0017 20.0 7.0 50K 6.60 10K 0.030 0.300 0.090 0.002K
73/09/17 14 45 0000 25.0 64 23 6.40 10K 0.040 0.300 0.030 0.006
14 ‘.5 0005 24.1 7.4 25 6.20 10K 0.040 0.300 0.030 0.006
14 45 0010 20.3 7.8 22 6.10 10K 0.040 0.200K 0.090 0.006
73/11/10 II 45 0000 13.5 60 19 6.50 10K 0.050 0.200 0.040 0.014
11 45 0010 13.2 9.L. 18 6.60 10K 0.050 0.200K 0.040 0.014
11 45 0016 12.7 9.2 13 6,40 10K 0.050 0.200K 0.040 0.015
00665 3?217
DATE TP4E DEPTH PHOS—TOT CP1LRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET M&/L P UG/L
73/06/29 11 50 0000 0.0I 2.5
11 50 0005 0.017
I I 50 0010 0.014
11 50 0fl17 0.070
71/09/17 16 45 0000 0.011 4,7
14 45 0005 0.012
)4 45 0010 0.015
73/11/10 11 ‘.5 0000 0.013 7.0
II 45 0010 0.021
11 45 0016 0.O?3
K V LU 4OftJ TO E LE- S
Tp-l ”4 IiD1C t
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOr t.T P’ EJ IEVAL UATE. 7 /0b/i7
lJu3A l 1303A1
34 Sb 4 .0 083 47 30.0
HU(, C EEr<
13 c 1 7.s HIAWASS E
T/LrIATU(,A LAKE
SUN 4YSIUL r !D . HI W GA HWY 2 38
11tP. LrS 2111204
0000 FEET UEPTrI
b30 JO6?5 Cbiu uh l UL,bbi
L)Mrt: 1 IHE DEPT -I U No3 TOT 4 J L Nri 4—N ‘- r-’C — 1S ,- rIO5T )E
F UM OF 4—TuT1 L N t,- IriU
I J uAY FEE I ‘I ,/L M M j/ r
73/ i/1u 1 10 u.1O0’ .uv’ j.O1u
7j/U4/j 1105 1.1 ,U
lj/ j /l’ 10 45 0.070 1.150 .tj.jd o. U)r U.uj&
7j/ Jh/0- 10 10 i .075 O.?10 ‘.C’,3
?J/4J7/LL. LU 10 .0*. 0. IC OI\ L12 u.fJ l5
7 j/ jzj/U5 11 00 u.115 0. IuJK j. 13 .U i5K 0.01 5
73/t, ,/t.H 11 10 ...1 ˝ u.lr u .‘3 . j.,ju
73/10/Ob 1 J 50 ..0 o.i c ..u4? ..i
7j/11/A0 104S j.11U (‘.4?S .( j3 1. jJ ,K G.uu
73/1 /0 11 10 “.13e v.1C \ .. . ,l2 . J0SP\
7’./t,1/05 1210 u. 12o 0.13tJt ,.u1’ j.U05r( U.u1
7’4/t)1/j 1030 u.112 U.1Ot) U.1.15 j.QU 5I\
7’,/ /0 12 00 . 1 1j4 U.bi , .uA5 L.OUb S U.UiU
7’./od/1 11 32 .1’- i.7C .04t, ‘i.u lU U.09U
-------
ST0 ET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/06/17
1iu3 i1 130381
34 55 30.0 083 44 00.0
e-IIAwASSEE IVEk
13 7. , MACEDONIA
1/CI-1uTUGA LAKE
sT Hwy 17 7 dROG 1 MI E JCT US 76
1IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET L)EPT -4
00630 00625 J 10 00b71 006oE
DATE TIME DEPTr4 i’1O NO3 TOT KJEL 14M3N PHOSDIS Pi-iOSTJT
F ROM Of N—TOTAL N TOTAL U I 1O
TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L M6/L Mb/L P MG/L
73/03/10 11 30 0.066 0.750 v.052 O.u0 0.010
73/0’./14 10 35 0.063 1.26u 0.065 0.00 5K 0.015
73/05/12 09 40 0.052 0.5R0 0.034 v.005k 0 ,0 10
73/06/09 09 25 0.054 0.720 0.23 ) 0.005K 0. OIv
73/07/14 09 50 0.06 0.400 0.005K 0.02
73/O /0S 10 20 0.0b2 0.100K u.009 0.005K 0.015
73/09/09 10 20 0.046 0.250 0.021 0.008 0.u2u
73/10/06 10 00 0.062 0,400 u. ’j34 0.006 0.045
73/11/10 10 00 0.042 0.350 0.017 0.006 u.U10
73/12/08 13 00 0.0Sf, 0.200 0.036 0.005K 0. O Sq,
74/01/05 11 30 0.092 0.3C0 0.020 0.005K
74/01/19 09 35 0.084 0.100k 0.035 0.005K 0.015
74/02/02 10 50 0.06 1.400 J.03u ‘J.O l S
7’e/02/1ô 10 L 0 0.068 0.300 U.02U 0.u Ob 0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8L
LESS THAN INuJC fEU
-------
STU ET E1 IEVAL DATE 7 5 1 ( 16/ 17
lJOJci2 31 2 32
i ud 00.0 u83 41 J0. ( 1
rt1. uS5 [ L I 1VEt (NC)
ii CLAY CTY H Y MAP
u/CriAEU(.,A LArct.
t3 L)& Jusi t3lLO DAM
11&ALES
4
( 10630
U0b2
0’)blU
0Gb?!
uO66
DEPIrI
NU ’JOj
101 KJEL
Nr13—N
-iO —1)IS
‘-‘HOSIOI
frTUTAL
N
TOTAL
U I-iU
FEET
M4,/L
1G/L
1C/L
(,/L f
OATE
F OM
To
73/03/lu
7_i/0’ / 14
73/(,E / i d
73/06/0 ‘
73/ ,j 1/14
7j/0 /0 5
73/09/0
7 3/ blOb
hI 11/ 1 ()
7 iI b ±/0
74/i) 1/OS
74/01/19
74/Jc / lb
I I M
OF
DAY
14 15
15 10
12 15
11 10
11 30
13 35
1’e 00
1? 45
13 1’
At) ?
14 05
11 00
1. 30
13 40
c ll 12u .
0000 FEET DEPTI
j • 1 3I
‘)• 1 + 7
0.147
o • 154
I.. 1I
0 . 10
0.115
S) .0 1
0.024
I_i .Od’4
J .0 38
0.0’, ,
0.12&
0. 16
0. 5 )0
o • 630
0. 1’30
0.170
O • 350
o • 20.
u.s50
u. joo’c
0. lOOK
0. ?00
U. )Cu
C ,. 3C 0
.031
) .220
J .u4’.
• (ISO
U. 120
, .046
) .O4’
3 • 046
‘I •OC
0.035
O. ( 13 5
j. 110
3.03 0
3.00 5K
o .OubK
. .oosrc
_i.00S
J.oos’c
0.005K
0.005K
U • 00 5K
• iJ05 ic
u. O O SK
o .OOStc
u.OOSK
O • 00 K
u. OCi5
O .005r
0 • 00 5K
,.I .uOSK
0.035
0.050
0.0 iD
CJ.u40
O .U i)
0.010
0.0 Lu
u.0 10
0 • uJO
r.. V. LUE “ O*N TO d l
LESS TH I INDIC TEO
-------
STO ET ETR1EVAL DATE 15/06/17
1303C1 1303C 1
34 55 30.0 083 44 30.0
F000EN C E€.K
13 7.5 ‘IACEUUNIA
T/CHATU(,A LAKt
t3r DG ON FODDE i C EEP( lW
1 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 OublO 0 o611 0066
DATt. 1I E DEPTH NO NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N l-’hOS-UIS - OS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL O 1riO
TO UAY FEET MG/L MG/L Mi,/L Mb/L P Mu/L p
74/03/10 12 00 0.072 0.620 0.048 J. OO SK Q.00Src
73/04/14 10 45 0.056 0.850 0.u 7 0.00 5 K 0. O lu
73/05/12 10 15 3.050 0.580 0.083 0.005K 0.010
73/06/09 09 50 0.063 0.810 0.340 0.005K 0.U lo
73/01/14 10 16 0.075 0.170 u.024 (,.009 0.030
73/08/05 10 50 0.069 0.100K u. o12 0.005K 0.015
73/09/09 11 00 0.056 0.d6 0 0.021 0.U O SK 0.015
73/10/06 10 30 0.050 0.200 v.u 2 5 0.005K (,. 045
73/11/10 10 30 0.04b3 0.200 0.024 j.014 0.030
73/12/08 10 55 u.080 0.100K u.008 0.005K 0.010
74/01/05 11 55 U.11 0.100K 0.015 u.U OSK 0.010
74/01/19 10 00 0.060 0.100 0.010 0.005K 0.010
74/02/Od 11 ‘.0 .12U 1.100 0.085 0.005
74/O /16 11 10 0.112 0.200 0.010 u.010 0.055
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO ET E1RIE AL OATE 75/06/17
I3JJ 1 3f 2u1
35 01 30.u 0 J 43 00.0
riUUtjkC, ( Rt €. (NC)
13 CLAY CTY HwY MAP
T/Cr4ATU(,A LAKE
U + tjRi)t, dELO CONFLU ROCiUN(, CHAtR BR
11AL 21112 j4
-+ 0000 FELT OEPTr1
00630 00 2i 0 )61(J 00671 00665
U. TE TIME DEPTH ‘ O2 NO3 101 KJEL N 3—N I hOS—üIS h0S—TJT
FROM OF —TOTAL N TUr L OkF iU
TO DAY FEET MG/C M(,/L M’/L M ,/L
13/ J/1O 14 50 0.160 0.460 .050 1 .005K U.O lu
73/U ./14 14 45 .1b0 1.300 •.1 05 J.0UDK 0.01 i
73/05/1 13 00 0.125 0.bOO .u3S •J. OCsK 0.015
73/06/0 10 45 0. ldO O. V 1 5i 0. O l o
73/07/1 ’ . 11 10 J.13 3 O,1U j< i.ui l .0u c
73/’J8/0 13 35 0.150 0.100K .01 e ) .oU K 0.013
7j/U’ /0 13 00 u.1 15 0 . 50 C.CJ12 j.uUS 0.010
73/ 10/US 12 20 u.120 0.350 .022 u.U 05K 0.UJD
7J/11/1( 12 50 i. l3es 0.400 j.01 u.0O5K 0.040
73/1 /0b 1? 45 0.240 1.500 3.040 0.005K 0.u S O
14/01/05 13 45 0.232 0,100K 3.015 o. O OSic 0.u l S
7 /u1/1- IL) 15 u.203 0.100K 0.020 U.O lo 0.u1
7’./u /0 13 50 u.264 1.200 ). o6 5 0.005 K 0.U T D
7L4/U /16 13 20 0.232 0.300 u.US5 0.010 0.Jdu
K VMLUE ci U N TO Bt
LESS 1H N IijUIC TLU
-------
ST0P ET I ETRIEVAL DATE 75/06/17
13u3E1 1303E1
i’. 5d 30.i.) O 33 44 00.0
r ELL CREEK
13 7. MACLUONIA
T/CHATuGA LAXc
SANK JUST . BOV MOUTH .25 AHOV PT 75 t3RUt.,
l lt.PALES 21112 o4
4 u000 FL T DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nr13—N PHO i)1S PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL (JWTHO
TO UAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L -‘ Mb/L
73/03/10 16 00 0.140 1.200 0.058 0.007 Q.u l’,
73/04/14 11 30 u .12t) 0.930 0.042 0.005K 0.u Ib
73/oS/12 11 10 0.096 0.480 0.058 0.00 5K 0.0 u
73/Ob/09 10 30 0.115 2.000 0.1d9 0.00 5K 0.010
73/07/1’. 1050 0.100 0.180 U.u lS 0.006 v.030
73/08/05 11 25 0.132 0.100K 0.019 0.00 5K 0.030
7i/09/09 12 00 0. l Os 0.300 0.021 0.006 0.u2 5
73/10/06 11 15 Ii.1l0 0.250 u.025 0.00 5K 0.usu
73/11/1011 15 u.13 0.500 0.025 0.005K 0.017
73/12/08 12 15 0.224 0.100 0.014 u. O O SK
74/01/05 13 30 0.240 0.100K 0.u Ib 0. 005K 0.015
7 ’ ./ul/19 1050 0.160 0.100K 0.015 0.005 0.015
74/02/02 13 30 0.240 0.800 0.050 0.010 0.065
74/02/lb 13 00 0.20u 0.A Ou 0.020 i.020 0. l lu
K VALUE K’ JO N TO BE
LESS THAN INDICi EEI.)
-------
TOriE1 NEFRIEVAL DATE Th/Ob/17
13jJF I 1303F1
34 i5 30.0 u 3 ‘.1 30.0
‘ L -iFj .t Cr Et K
13 7.j MACLOONIA
F/CHATIJ(,4 L4Kr
d MI L OF JCF ST HWY Li AND US 76
iiLr MLES 211120’.
-s 0000 FL .1 DEPTIl
00630 00625 O’jbJ O Qt67 1 0U6
UATt T1’ iE DEPTH NO2 NOJ TOT tSJEL NH —N PrjOSi;15 hUSEUf
FrcOM OF TOFAL N TOTAL ur Ir1()
10 DAY FEEl M(,/L -1G/L MG/L rl(,/L p
73/o3/1 ) 1 30 3.1 ’ . ? 0.7S ) ‘.2ti . i0f’
ij/j4/1’. it) dO j.1?0 O. 40 ,.t54 ‘..00 K
73/05/12 Q9 55 ).12 1.J?0 O.0 0 u.u( 5K O.ULD
73/07/1-. 13 40 u.12 0 0.103 c 0. 1f 0.005 K 0.udd
73/ i/0S 10 35 0.141 (,.120 .uQ9 0.u OSK u.045
73/0 /0 I 10 0 i.150 0.J3 .02S ).0u7 0.03u
73/10/Ob 10 20 j.1JU 0.100K ,.02
73/11/10 10 IS 3.12 0.1 s c.u05K 0.025
73/Id/Ob 10 40 0.216 0.103K j.00t J.005K
74/01/05 11 ‘.5 .2? ’ . 0 ,100K 0.010 0.005K
7’-./ 1/i9 u9 IS 0. lbO O.IC OK 0.020 0.u O5Pc U.01
74/Od/02 11 20 j.23 1.700 J.050 0.015
74/ d/16 10 55 u.176 0.300 0.020 (j.u l O u.100
K V LUL KNOWN TO BE
LtSS It-iAN ls tDICATEu
------- |