U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                        WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                             REPORT
                                              ON
                                         LAKE VERMILION
                                         VERMILION COUNTY
                                            ILLINOIS
                                          EPA REGION V
                                       WORKING PAPER No, 320
     CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                                 and
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440

-------
                                   REPORT
                                     ON
                              LAKE VERNILION
                              VERMILION  COUNTY
                                  ILLINOIS
                                EPA REGION V
                            WORKING PAPER No, 320
      WITH THE COOPERATION  OF  THE
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                AND THE
        ILLINOIS NATIONAL GUARD
              JUNE,  1975

-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword jj
List of Illinois Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Suniniary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 15
VI. Appendices 16

-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and 3O5(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
•111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency for professional involvement and to the
Illinois National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Dr. Richard H. Briceland, Director of the Illinois Environ-
mental Protection Agency; and Ronald M. Barganz, State Survey
Coordinator, and John J. Forneris, Manager of Region III, Field
Operations Section of the Division of Water Pollution Control,
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the
Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Harold R. Patton, the Adjutant General of
Illinois, and Project Officer Colonel Daniel L. Fane, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Illinois National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Baldwin Randolph
Bloomington McLean
Carlyle Bond, Clinton, Fayette
Cedar Lake
Charleston Coles
Coffeen Montgomery
Crab Orchard Jackson, Williamson
Decatur Macon
DePue Bureau
East Loon Lake
Fox Lake
Grass Lake
Highland Silver Madison
Holiday LaSalle
Horseshoe Madison
Long Lake
Lou Yaeger Montgomery
Marie Lake
Old Ben Mine Franklin
Pistakee Lake, McHenry
Raccoon Marion
Rend Franklin, Jefferson
Sangchris Christian
Shelbyville Moultrie, Shelby
Slocum Lake
Springfield Sangarnon
Storey Knox
Vandalia Fayette
Vermilion Vermilion
Wee—Ma—Tuk Ful ton
Wonder McHenry

-------
Ill.
Location
LAKE VERMILION
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Plant
) Drainage Area Boundary

-------
-LAKE VERMILION
STORET NO. 1748
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Lake Vermilion is eutrophic. It
ranked 24th in overall trophic quality when the 31 Illinois
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using an index of six
pararneters*. Fifteen of the lakes had less median total
phosphorus, 16 had less median dissolved phosphorus, 29 had
less median inorganic nitrogen, 17 had less mean chlorophyll
a, and 16 had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked
depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at sampling
station 1 in August.
Survey limnologists noted moderate turbidity (1% light pene-
tration ranged from 0.4-1.5 m) during all sampling periods, and
emergent vegetation was observed in the shallow areas near
station 2.
B. Rate—Limiting Nutrient:
A significant loss of phosphorus occurred in the assay
sample from the time of collection to the beginning of the
assay, and the results are not indicative of conditions in
the lake at the time the sample was taken (05/11/73).
* See Appendix A.

-------
2
However, the mean concentration of orthophosphorus in the
lake at that time indicates a probable high level of potential
primary productivity.
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all samp-
ling times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The estimated phosphorus contribution
of known point sources, including septic tanks, amounted to
31.2% of the total load to Lake Vermilion during the sampling
year. The City of Hoopeston contributed 30.5%, and Rossville
septic tanks contributed 0.7% of the total.
The present phosphorus loading rate of 10.20 g/m 2 /yr is
seven times that proposed by Vollenwider (Vollenweider and
Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic rate (see page 14). However, the
mean hydraulic retention time of Lake Vermilion is a short nine
days, and Vollenweider’s model probably is not applicable.
Nonetheless, the trophic condition of the lake is evidence of
excessive nutrient loads, and all phosphorus inputs should be
minimized to the greatest practicable extent.
2. Non-point sources-—The North Fork, Vermilion River was
estimated to have contributed 62.4% of the total phosphorus
load reaching Lake Vermilion during the sampling year. The
ungaged drainage area was estimated to have contributed 6.3%
of the total.

-------
              The phosphorus export rate of the North Fork, Vermilion
          River compares well with the rates of five tributaries of
          nearby Lake Decatur* (mean of 35 kg/km2/yr; range of 31 to
          41 kg/km2/yr) but was somewhat higher than most of the
          tributaries sampled for land-use studies (see page 13).
* Working Paper No. 302.

-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICSTh
A. Lake Morphometrytt:
1. Surface area: 2.83 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 1.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >4.6 meters.
4. Volume: 3.962 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 9 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area ( 2)* ( m 3 /sec)*
N. Fork, Vermilion River 730.4 4.8
Minor tributaries &
inniediate drainage - 41.2 0.3
Totals 771.6 5.1
2. Outlet -
N. Fork, Vermilion River 774 4** 5.1
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 120.8 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 95.1 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions--Appendix B.
ft Forneris, 1973.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175.
** Includes area of lake.
See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Vermilion was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two
stations on the lake and from one or more depths at each station (see
map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the two stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9—liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 4.6 meters at station 1 and 0.9 meters at station 2.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.

-------
2 SITES
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL
AND CHEMICAL CrIARACTERISTICS FOR VERMILION LAKE
STORET CODE 1748
1ST SAMPLING C 5/11/73) 2ND SAMPLING ( 8/ 8/73) 3RD SAMPLING (10/17/73)
2 SITES
2 SITES
PARAMETER
RANGI
MIAN
MEDIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
TEMP (C)
16.6
— I7.I
17.3
17.4
23.4
— 25.3
24.6
25.0
17.8
— 18.6
18.3
18.4
DISS OXY (MG/L)
8.0
— 9.7
8.7
8.6
0.8
- 8.8
5.4
6.5
5.8
— 6.0
5.9
5.9
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
600.
— 650.
623.
625.
524.
— 533.
528.
526.
460.
— 475.
464.
461.
PH (STAND UNITS)
8.1
— 8.3
8.2
8.2
7.6
— 8.3
8.0
8.1
8.0
— 8.2
8.1
8.0
TOT ALK (MG/L)
200.
— 220.
214.
220.
197.
— 235.
216.
217.
210.
— 238.
222.
218.
TOT P (MG/L)
0.068
— 0.123
0.09’.
0.097
0.069
— 0.223
0.130
0.114
0.111
— 0.121
0.117
0.120
ORTP4O P (MG/L)
0.040
— 0.066
0.054
0.054
0.008
— 0.064
0.031
0.026
0.047
— 0.060
0.055
0.057
N02.N03 (MG/L)
7.250
— 7.680
7.542
7.620
4.040
— 4.620
4.425
4.520
1.110
— 1.380
1.203
1.120
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.030
— 0.110
0.068
0.070
0.090
— 0.120
0.105
0.105
0.050
— 0.140
0.093
0.090
KJEL N (MG/L)
0.400
— 0.800
0.520
0.500
1.000
— 1.900
1.450
1.450
0.500
— 1.400
0.833
0.600
INOWG N (MG/L)
7.280
— 7.750
7.610
7.730
4.140
— 4.730
4.530
4.625
1.160
— 1.520
1.297
1.210
TOTAL N (MG/L)
7.650
— 8.420
8.062
8.060
5.620
— 6.300
5.875
5.790
1.610
— 2.780
2.037
1.720
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
5.3
— 12.6
8.9
8.9
18.7
— 96.3
57.5
57.5
18.8
— 35.2
27.0
27.0
SECCHI (METERS)
0.4
— 0.8
0.6
0.6
0.2
— 0.7
0.4
0.4
0.3
— 0.5
0.4
0.4

-------
7
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton —
Sampling Dominant Algal units
Date Genera per ml
05/11/73 1. Melosira • . 534
2. Synedra 276
3. Flagellates 129
4. Cryptomonas p. 110
5. Euglena p. 55
Other genera 258
Total 1,362
08/08/73 1. Cyclotella p. 776
2. Merismopedia .p.. 388
3. Blue-green filaments 259
4. Flagellates 216
5. Cryptomonas p. 216
Other genera 559
Total 2,414
10/17/73 1. Stephanodiscus p_. 8,643
2. Euglena p.. 1,493
3. Chlamydomonas 1,257
4. Cryptomonas p. 1,110
5. Crucigenia p. 1,021
Other genera 5,096
Total 18,620

-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ____________
05/11/73 01 5.3
02 12.6
08/08/73 01 18.7
02 96.3
10/17/73 01 18.8
02 35.2
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
An 80% loss of orthophosphorus occurred In the assay
sample from the time of collection to the beginning of the
assay, and the results are not indicative of lake conditions
at the time the sample was collected (05/11/73). However,
the mean concentration of phosphorus in the lake at the time
of collection (0.054 mg/l) indicates a probable high level
of potential primary productivity.
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all
sampling times; the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus
ratios were 24/1 or greater, and phosphorus limitation would
be expected.

-------
9
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Illinois National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in June, 1973, and was completed in May, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “nornialized” or average year were provided by
the Illinois District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads.
Nutrient loads for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated by using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /year, at stations B-i, C-i, D-l, E-i, F-l,
and G—1 (see page 13) and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
The City of Hoopeston did not participate in the Survey, and
nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
The Village of Rossville has no municipal system and is served by
septic tanks.
* See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
10
A. Waste Sources*:
1. Known municipal —
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment ( m 3 /d) Water
Hoopeston 7,500 trickling 2,838.8** Hoopeston
filter Creek
Rossville 1,700 septic 643.4** N. Fork,
tanks Vermilion R.
2. Known industrial - None
* Barganz, 1975.
** Estimated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.

-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
N. Fork, Vermilion River 18,010 62.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,820 6.3
c. Known municipal —
Hoopeston 8,805 30.5
d. Septic tanks (Rossville)* - 195 0.7
e. Known industrial — None —
f. Direct precipitation* - 50 0.1
Total 28,880 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - N. Fork,
Vermilion River 19,430
3. Net annual P accumulation — 9,450 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Source ______
a. Tributaries (non-point load) —
N. Fork, Vermilion River
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) -
c. Known municipal -
Hoopes ton
d. Septic tanks (Rossville)* -
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* -
Total
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet — N. Fork,
Vermilion River 1,020,830
3. Net annual N accumulation — 77,275 kg.
0.3
100.0
kg NI
yr
% of
total
994,045 90.5
68,250 6.2
25,510
7,245
2.3
0.7
3,055
1 ,098,l05
* See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
13
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary
k P/km 2 /yr
kq N/km 2 /yr
N. Fork, Vermilion River
Unnamed Creek (B-i *
Unnamed Creek (C-i *
Unnamed Creek (D_l)*
Unnamed Creek (E_1)*
Middle Branch (F_l)*
Unnamed Creek (G_i)*
1 ,36l
1 ,610
1 ,549
1 ,949
1 ,771
1 ,612
1 ,448
* These tributaries were sampled for
here for comparison. The nutrient
included in the N. Fork, Vermilion
land-use studies and are presented
exports of these streams are
River exports at station A-2.
25
18
16
109
93
15
14

-------
14
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
welder and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” rate Is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 10.20 3.34 388.0 27.3
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Vermilion:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic rate) 1.44
“Permissible” (oligotrophic rate) 0.72

-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Barganz, Ronald M., 1975. Personal communication (point sources
impacting Lake Vermilion). IL Env. Prot. Agency, Springfield.
Forneris, John J., 1973. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
IL Env. Prot. Agency, Springfield.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.

-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS

-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15- MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CHL ORA MIN DO DISS ORT 1O P
1703 LAKE 8LOOMINC .ION 0.050 5.730 464.667 26.200 L’..800 0.020
1706 LAKE CARLYLE 0.084 1.270 477.889 11.367 11.000 0.032
1708 LAKE CHARLESTON 0.160 4.680 490.667 12.000 8.400 0.065
1711 COFFEEN LAKE 0.032 0.260 45o.222 7.700 14.900 0.012
1712 CRA8 ORCHAI D LAKE 0.082 0.200 482.222 59.867 13.600 0.013
1704 LAKE DECATUR 0.129 3.750 479.571 43.000 04.500 0.062
1725 LONG LAKE 0.704 1.190 482.667 49.333 8.800 0.398
1726 LAKE LOU YAEGER 0.186 1.600 489.583 10.662 11.400 0.07o
1727 LAKE MARIE 0.098 0.370 47.667 39.533 14.700 0.057
1733 PISTAKEE LAKE 0.203 0.370 485.667 75.867 7.000 0.062
1735 REND LAKE 0.071 0.210 471.500 23.533 12.700 0.012
1739 LAKE SHEL8TVLLLE 0.062 3.290 461.333 17.161 14.800 0.019
1740 SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) 0.226 0.970 489.500 5.822 14.800 0.057
1142 LAKE SPRINGFIELD 0.109 3.265 483.365 13.013 10.800 0.059
1748 VERMILION LAKE 0.109 4.695 481.500 31.150 14.200 0.050
1750 wONDER LAKE 0.426 0.890 486.000 98.533 7.800 0.132
1751 LAKE STORY 0.072 2.510 459.333 17.250 14.800 0.u21
1752 OEPI )E LAKE 0.438 4.050 490.000 58.833 7.600 0.276
1753 LAKE SANGCP,WIS 0.050 1.970 47 5.4 l7 19.292 14.500 0.009
1754 LAKE HOLIDAY 0.167 3.135 485.167 51.217 7.200 0.046
1755 FOX LAKE 0.219 0.375 486.161 63.850 8.800 0.083
1756 G ASS LAKE 0.301 0.820 481.000 83.500 5.900 0.093
1757 EAST LOON LAKE 0.076 0.120 450.000 22.300 14.900 0.01
1756 SLOCUM LAKE 0.865 0.200 467.433 221.100 5.800 0.362
1759 CEDAR LAKE 0.029 0.170 400.333 5.767 12.800 0.013
1761 LAKE WEMATUK 0.069 0.770 466.333 7.967 14.500 0.031
1762 RACCOON LAKE 0.106 0.310 484.333 19.217 13.800 0.020
1763 BALDWIN LAKE 0.044 0.140 461.167 11.333 13.200 0.007

-------
LAKE
DATA
TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
LAKE
NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL
P
MEDIAN
INORG
N
500-
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CriLO A
iS-
MIN DO
1764
LAKE
VANOALIA
0.116
0.480
478.111
11.276
1 .aoo
1765
OLD
BEN MINE RES1kVOLi
0.930
0.205
478.333
31.433
11.200
1766
HORSESHOE LAKE
0.127
0.705
482.833
182.2 0
6. O0
MEU IAN
CUSS O t’i0 P
0.023
0.575
O.01t:

-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500- MEAN 15- MEDIAN INDEX
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORD N MEAN SEC CP4LORA MIN DO DISS ORTHO P NU
1703 LAKE BLOOMINGTON 88 ( 26) 0 ( 0) 0 I 24) 47 1 14) 13 ( 2) 68 I 20) 296
1706 LAKE CARLYLE 63 1 19) ‘.0 1 12) 63 I 19) 63 I 19) 63 I 19) 53 I 16) 345
1708 LAKE CHARLESTON 37 I 11) 7 ( 2) 0 I 0) 77 23) 77 ( 23) 27 4 8) 225
1711 COFFEEN LAKE 97 ( 29) 77 ( 23) 93 1 28) 93 I 28) 2 1 0) 92 I 27) 454
1712 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 67 I 20) 90 I 27) 43 C 13) 20 4 6) 42 ( 12) 85 25) 347
1714 LAKE DECATUR 40 I 12) 13 I 4) 53 1 16) 33 C 10) 30 4 8) 32 9) 20)
1725 LONG LAKE 7 I 2) 43 I 13) 40 4 12) 30 C 9) 72 1 21) 3 4 1) 195
1726 LAKE LOU YA(GER 30 I 9) 37 ( 11 7 I 2) 87 1 26) 57 I 17) 23 4 7) 241
1727 LAKE MARIE 60 I 18) 68 C 20) 73 I 22) 37 ( 11) 23 1 7) 42 C 12) 303
1733 PISTAKEE LAKE 27 I 8) 68 C 20) 23 I 7) 13 1 4) 90 I 27) 32 4 9) 253
1735 REND LAKE 77 I 23) 80 4 24) 70 I 21) 50 4 15) 53 I 16) 92 4 27) 422
1739 LAKE SHEL YVILLE 83 I 25) 17 1 5) 83 C 251 70 C 21) 13 C 2) 73 I 22) 339
1740 SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) 20 1 6) 47 C 14) 10 C 3) 97 I 29) 13 I 2) 42 4 12) 229
1742 LAKE SPRINGFIELD 53 C 16) 20 C 6) 33 1 10) 73 I 22) 67 1 20) 37 C 11) 283
1748 VERMILION LAKE 50 I IS) 3 1 1) 47 I 14) 43 1 13) 37 1 11) 47 C 14) 227
1750 WONDER LAKE 13 C 4) 50 C 15) 20 C 6) 7 I 2) 80 C 24) 13 C 4) 183
1751 LAKE STORY 73 I 22) 27 1 8) 90 1 27) 67 1 20) 13 I 2) 63 1 19) 333
1752 DEPUE LAKE 10 I 3) 10 I 3) 3 C 1) 23 4 7) 83 ( 25) 10 C 3) 139
1753 LAKE SANGCHRIS 88 I 26) 30 1 9) 67 I 20) 57 1 17) 30 I 8) 97 ( 29) 369
175’. LAKE HOLIDAY 33 I 10) 23 I 7) 27 I 8) 27 4 8) 87 1 26) 50 1 15) 247
1755 FOX LAKE 23 I 7> 63 I 19) 17 1 5) 17 4 5) 72 4 21) 20 I 6) 212
1756 GRASS LAKE 17 I 5) 53 I 16) 50 1 IS) 10 I 3) 91 I 29) 17 I 5) 244
1757 EAST LOON LAKE 70 1 2)) 100 I 30) 97 C 29) 53 I 16) 2 I 0) 77 C 23) 399
1758 SLOCUP4 LAKE 3 C 1) 87 I 26) 13 I 4) 0 1 0) 100 I 30) 7 C 2) 210
1759 CEDAR LAKE 100 I 30) 93 1 28) 100 I 30) 100 C 30) 50 I 15) 85 C 25) 52
1761 LAKE WEMATUK 80 1 24) 33 1 10) 17 I 23) 90 C 27) 30 C 8) 57 1 17) 367
1762 RACCOON LAKE 57 C 17) 73 I 22) 30 I 9) 60 C 18) 42 1 12) 68 I 20) 330
1763 BALDWIN LAKE 93 C 28) 97 1 29) 87 C 26) 80 I 24) 47 C I ’ .) 100 ( 30) 504

-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15— MEDIAN INDEA
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC CP4LORA MIN DO DISS Oi TtiO P NO
1764 LAP’ E VANDALIA ‘.7 ( 14) 60 C 18) 60 C 18) 83 ( 25) 13 ( 2) 60 ( 18) 323
1765 OLD bEN MINE RESERVOIR 0 ( 0) 83 C 25) 57 ( 17) ‘.0 ( 12) 60 C 18) 0 ( 0) 2 eO
1766 HORSESHOE LAKE ‘.3 ( 13) 57 C 17) 37 ( 11) 3 ( 1) 93 C 28) 80 ( 24) 313

-------
LAKES RANKED BY 1NDE NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 1759 CEDAR LAKE 528
2 1763 BALDWIN LAKE 504
3 1711 COFFEEN LAKE 454
4 1735 REND LAKE 422
5 1757 EAST LOON LAKE 399
6 1753 LAKE SANGCrIRIS 369
7 1761 LAKE WEMATUK 367
8 1712 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 347
9 1706 LAKE CARLYLE 345
10 1739 LAKE SMELBYVILLE 339
ii 1751 LAKE STORY 333
12 1762 RACCOON LAKE 330
13 1764 LAKE VANDALIA 323
14 1766 HOPSESr4OE LAKE 313
15 1727 LAKE MARIE 303
16 1703 LAKE BLOOMINGTON 296
17 1742 LAKE SPRINGFIELD 283
18 1733 PISTAKEE LAKE 253
19 175’. LAKE HOLIDAY 247
20 1756 GRASS LAKE 244
21 1726 LAKE LOU YAEGER 241
22 1765 OLD BEN NINE RESERVOIR 240
23 1740 SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) 229
24 1748 VENMILION LAKE 227
25 I1OB LAKE CHARLESTON 225
2b 1755 FOK LAKE 212
27 1758 SLOCUM LAKE 210
28 171 ’. LAKE DECATUR 201

-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
29 1725 LONG LAKE 195
30 1750 WONDER LAKE 183
31 1752 DEPUE LAKE 139

-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSIONS FACTORS

-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x lO = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile

-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR ILLINOIS 10/23/75
LAKE CODE 1748 LAKE VERMILION
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SQ KM) 771.8
SUB—DRAINAGE NORMALIZED FLOIS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY AREA(S0 KH) JAN FEB MAP APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
1748A1 771.8 5.38 7.48 9.60 9.94 7.8’. 6.37 3.99 2.12 1.58 1.85 2.5’. 2.94 5.12
1748A2 730.4 5.07 7.05 9.03 9.37 7.39 6.00 3.68 j• 9 1.48 1.73 2.38 2.77 4.81
1748A3 101.0 0.65 0.98 1.21 1.25 0.98 0.82 0.50 0.26 0.18 0.20 0.29 0.34 0.63
174881 14.3 0.08 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.09
1748C1 25.2 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.24 0.21 0.12 0.06 0.04 0.0’. 0.07 0.08 0.15
1748D1 22.9 0.1’. 0.22 0.27 0.28 0.22 0.19 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.1’.
1748E1 29.8 o.ie 0.29 0.35 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.14 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.18
1748F1 47.7 0.29 0.32 0.56 0.58 0.45 0.39 0.23 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.16 0.28
172861 35.0 0.22 0.34 0.41 0.42 0.33 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.21
17’.8Z 1 44.0 0.31 0.42 0.57 0.57 0.45 0.37 0.31 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.30
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 771.8 TOTAL FLOW IN = 82.06
SUN OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 1050.3 TOTAL FLOW our = 61.63
NOTE *0* TRIBS A3 THRU 61 ARE INCLUDED IN A2
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1748A1 6 73 23.28 3 8.10
7 73 8.50 7 .10
8 73 5.21 26 1.90
9 73 0.82 9 1.16
10 73 0.71 13 2.29
11 73 1.30 3 0.65
12 73 10.19 1 3.03
1 74 24.13 6 6.97
2 74 16.62 3 13.25 17 5.13
3 74 15.32 2 12.80 17 18.29
4 74 14.07 7 11,50
S 74 25.26 5 4.25
1748A2 6 73 22.26 3 7.99
7 73 8.21 7 5.07
8 73 5.24 26 2.12
9 73 1.13 9 1.44
10 73 0.99 13 2.49
11 73 1.56 3 0.93
12 73 9.91 1 3.17
1 74 23.05 6 6.88
2 74 16.00 3 12.83 17 5.15
3 74 14.72 2 12.37 17 17.53
4 74 13.59 7 11.16
S 74 24.10 5 4.28

-------
TRI8UTARY FLOW INFW*iATION FOR ILLINOIS 10/23/75
LAKE CODE 1748 LAr E VERMILION
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1748A3 6 73 3.06 3 1.10
7 73 1.10 7 0.68
8 73 0.68 26 0.27
9 73 0.14 9 0.18
10 73 0.11 13 0.28
11 73 0.19 3 0.11
12 73 1.22 1 0.40
74 2.94 6 0.88
2 74 2.24 3 1.78 17 0.71
3 74 1.98 2 1.64 17 2.35
4 74 1.81 7 1.47
5 74 3.20 5 0.57
1748b1 6 73 0.42 3 0.15
7 73 0.15 7 0.09
8 73 0.09 26 0.04
9 73 0.02 9 0.02
10 73 0.01 13 0.03
11 73 0.03 3 0.02
12 73 0.15 1 0.05
1 74 0.37 6 0.11
2 74 0.31 3 0.25 17 0.10
3 74 0.27 2 0.23 17 0.31
4 74 0.25 7 0.20
5 74 0.42 5 0.08
1748C1 6 73 0.76 3 0.27
7 73 0.27 7 0.16
8 73 0.16 26 0.07
9 73 0.03 9 0.04
10 73 0.03 13 0.11
11 73 0.04 3 0.03
12 73 0.28 1 0.09
1 74 0.71 6 0.21
2 74 0.57 3 0.45 17 0.18
3 7 . 0.48 2 0.40 17 0.57
4 74 0.45 7 0.37
5 74 0.76 5 0.14
174801 6 73 0.68 3 0.25
7 73 0.24 7 0.15
8 73 0.15 26 0.06
9 73 0.03 9 0.03
10 73 0.02 13 0.10
II 73 0.04 3 0.02
12 73 0.24 1 0.08
1 74 0.62 6 0.19
2 74 0.51 3 0.40 17 0.16
3 7’. 0.45 2 0.37 17 0.51
4 74 0.40 7 0.34
5 74 0.71 5 0.12

-------
TRIBUTARy FLOW INFORMATION FO ILLINOIS 10/23/75
LAKE CODE 1748 LAKE VERMILION
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
1748E1 6 73 0.91 3 0.31
7 73 0.31 7 0.20
8 73 0.19 26 0.08
9 73 0.04 9 0.05
10 73 0.03 13 0.13
11 73 0.05 3 0.03
12 73 0.34 1 0.11
1 74 0.85 6 0.25
2 74 0.68 3 0.54 17 0.22
3 74 0.57 2 0.48 17 0.68
4 74 0.54 7 0.42
5 74 0.93 5 0.17
1748F 1 6 73 1.44 3 0.51
7 73 0.51 7 0.31
8 73 0.31 26 0.12
9 73 0.06 9 0.08
10 73 0.05 13 0.21
I I 73 0.08 3 0.05
12 73 0.57 1 0.18
1 74 1.33 6 0.40
2 74 1.05 3 0.85 17 0.34
3 74 0.91 2 0.76 17 1.10
4 74 0.85 7 0.68
S 74 1.47 5 0.26
174801 6 73 10.59 3 3.79
7 73 0.37 7 0.23
8 73 0.23 26 0.09
9 73 0.05 9 0.06
10 73 0.03 13 0.15
11 73 0.06 3 0.04
12 73 0.40 1 0.13
I 74 0.99 6 0.28
2 74 0.76 3 0.62 17 0.25
3 74 0.68 2 0.57 17 0.79
4 74 0.62 7 0.51
5 74 1.39 5 0.25
I T4bZZ 6 73 1.02 3 0.11
7 73 0.68 7 0.42
8 73 0.28 2b 0.14
9 73 0.06 9 0.08
10 73 0.08 13 0.17
Ii 73 0.08 3 0.05
12 73 0.51 I 0.16
1 74 1.25 6 0.37
2 74 0.96 3 0.76 17 0.31
3 74 0.91 2 0.76 17 1.08
4 74 0.82 7 0.68
5 74 1.47 5 0.28

-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
174801
40 09 24.0 087 39 03.0
VERMILION LAKE
17183 ILLINOIS
LIEPALES 2111202
3 0018 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER 00 TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT HG/L INCHES MICROMMO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L P46/L MG/L P
73/05/11 11 00 0000 17.5 33 600 8.10 210 0.040 0.500 7.500 0.040
11 00 0005 17.4 9.7 600 8.30 200 0.030 0.400 7.250 0.046
11 00 0015 16.6 8.0 625 8.20 220 0.070 0.500 7.680 0.054
73/08/08 10 00 0000 25.3 26 524 8.30 197 0.090 1.800 4.500 0.008
10 00 0005 25.0 6.5 533 7.90 203 0.120 1.100 4.540 0.021
10 00 0014 23.4 0.8 526 7.60 230 0.110 1.000 4.620 0.064
73/10/17 15 25 0000 18.6 18 460 8.00 238 0.140 1.400 1.380 0.060
15 25 0005 18.5 5.8 462 8.20 218 0.050 0.500 1.110 0.047
15 25 0012 18.4 6.0 460 8.00 210 0.090 0.600 1.120 0.057
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PIIOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/11 11 00 0000 0.068 5.3
11 00 0005 0.072
11 00 0015 0.097
73/08/08 10 00 0000 0.069 18.7
10 00 0005 0.090
10 00 0014 0.138
73/10/17 15 25 0000 0.120 18.8
15 25 0005 0.121
15 25 0012 0.111

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
174802
40 10 30.0 087 38 33.0
VERMILION LAKE
17183 ILLINOIS
1IEPALES 2111202
3 0005 FEET DEPTH
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT XJEL N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MC ,/L M(,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/05/11 10 25 0000 17.8 8.3 17 650 8.20 220 0.110 0.800 7.620 0.066
10 25 0003 17.3 9.0 640 8.20 220 0.090 0.400 7.660 0.062
73/08/08 10 20 0000 8.8 7 8.30 235 0.100 1.900 4.040 0.032
73/10/17 15 20 0000 17.8 10 475
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/11 10 25 0000 0.123 12.6
10 25 0003 0.108
73/08/08 10 20 0000 0.223 96.3
73/10/17 15 20 0000 35.2

-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
1748A1
‘+0 08 12.0 087 39 16.0
N FORK VERMILION RIVEN
17167 7.5 NW DANVILLE
U/LAKE VERMILION
RD GROG 1.5 MI DOWNSTREAM FROM DAM
11EPALES 211120 ’ +
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTIIO
TO DAY FEET HG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/03 08 27 7.000 0.580 0.098 0.039 0.105
73/07/07 13 00 6.500 0.100K 0.050 0.023 0.095
73/08/26 10 30 2.200 0.830 0.061 0.052 0.090
73/09/09 13 35 1.200 1.200 0.041 0.020 0.150
73/10/13 10 10 1.060 0.920 0.044 0.042 0.135
73/11/03 15 45 1.020 1.150 0.075 0.041 0.230
73/12/01 14 40 1.260 0.600 0.060 0.076 0.115
74/01/06 10 46 8.900 1.100 0.116 0.056 0.075
74/02/03 10 3 8.300 0.400 0.065 0.0 0 0.085
74/02/17 10 20 7.400 1.700 0.090 0.015
74/03/02 14 45 7.980 1.500 0.070 0.055 0.110
74/03/17 10 20 7.440 0.600 0.060 0.050 0.100
74/04/07 10 50 7.300 1.100 0.040 0.055 0.110
74/05/05 10 15 6.400 0.700 0.045 0.045 0.115
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
I 748A2
40 12 58.0 087 38 18.0
N FORK VERMILION RIVER
17 7.5 N DANVILLE
I/LAKE VERMILION
ST HWY 136 tjRDi, 4 MI N OF DANVILLE
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FtET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N Pi-IOS—DIS PP-lOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/06/03 10 55 8.500 0.170 0.072 0.090 0.165
73/07/07 11 35 7.150 0.660 0.016 0.105 0.163
73/08/26 10 15 2.600 0.230 3.034 0.15’. 0.170
73/09/09 12 40 1.440 1.150 0.210 0.280 0.330
73/10/13 09 55 2.020 1.000 0.069 0.280 0.345
73/11/03 15 15 1.840 0.400 0.052 0.290 0.360
73/12/01 14 20 6.100 0.100K 0.044 0.096 0.110
74/02/03 10 20 8.300 0.400 0.090 0.065 0.100
74/02/17 10 05 7.500 0.900 0.070 0.050 0.062
74/03/02 14 30 8.100 0.700 0.040 0.040 0.07 -
74/03/17 10 00 8.600 1.100 0.04S 0.035 0.095
74/04/07 10 35 8.700 1.000 0.027 0.045 0.143
74/05/05 10 00 6.600 0.500 0.020 0.055 0.100
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICMTEO

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
I 7’.8A3
40 29 25.0 08? 34 04.0
N FK VERMILION RIVER
17 7.5 AMBIA
1/LAKE VERMILION
2NDRY RD BROG 2.5 M I W
1 1EPALES
4
OF AMBIA
211 120 .
0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N026.N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L
PlG/L P
MG/L P
73/07/07
11
35
6.900
0.100K
0.046
0.028
0.060
73/08/26
09
05
0.340
0.078
0.042
0.075
73/09/09
10
.5
1.600
1.500
0.044
0.027
0.080
73/10/13
09
00
1.000
1.680
0.118
0.042
0. 70
73/11/03
10
30
1.160
1.250
0.072
0.054
0.250
73/12/01
11
15
6.900
0.400
0.024
0.030
0.185
74/01/06
09
30
9.750
0.700
0.044
0.020
0.025
74/02/03
09
30
9.200
0.600
0.080
0.020
0.055
74/02/17
09
05
8.900
0.900
0.045
0.015
0.030
74/03/02
10
30
9.500
0.800
0.020
0.015
0.040
74/03/17
09
00
10.050
0.800
0.030
0.010
0.025
74/04/07
09
15
10.000
1.000
0.020
0.020
0.060
74/05/05
09
10
8.600
0.500
0.030
0.022
0.0’.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INOICATEO

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
174thi1
‘+0 15 55.0 087 38 40.0
UNNAMED CREEK
17 7. HENNING
T/LAKE 1ERMILION
2N1)RY RD dRDG 0.4 MI E OF MOORES CORNER
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET OEPTr
00630 00525 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOSTOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L PIG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/03 10 40 10.100 0.720 0.040 0.035 0.090
73/07/07 12 30 9.300 0.100K 0.020 0.025 0.0 0
73/08/26 09 55 6.400 0.200 0.025 0.019 0.025
73/o9/09 12 30 5.700 0.720 0.037 0.021 0.070
73/10/13 09 45 4.600 0.840 0.044 0.029 0.090
73/11/03 14 45 5.200 1.825 0.051 0.048 0.340
73/12/01 14 00 5.900 0.100K 0.012 0.028 0.185
74/01/06 io 15 8.600 0.500 0.016 0.020 0.030
7’+/02/03 10 15 7.100 0.800 0.035 0.040 0.0 0
74/02/17 09 55 7.300 0.300 0.020 0.020 0.045
74/03/02 14 00 7.800 0.800 0.010 0.020 0.080
74/03/17 09 50 8.550 0.400 0.013 0.020 0.055
74/04/07 10 25 8.500 0.800 0.025 0.025 0.060
74/05/05 09 50 7.800 0.400 0.015 0.016 0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
I 748C1
40 20 44.0 087 42 10.0
UNNAMED CREEK
17 7.5 HENNING
I/LAKE VERMILION
2NDRY RD bROG 2.5 MI N OF HENNING
1IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PPIQS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/03 09 20 10.100 1.680 0.040 0.020 0.040
73/07/07 12 10 9.100 0.100K 0.029 0.012 0.035
73/08/26 09 35 5.300 0.880 0.027 0.006 0.120
73/09/09 12 Os 2.300 0.560 0.180 0.009 0.025
73/10/13 09 30 2.800 0.660 0.050 0.019 0.080
73/11/03 13 55 3.600 0.950 0.060 0.018 0.190
73/12/01 13 40 8.100 0.100K 0.012 0.024 0.375
74/01/06 10 00 9.000 0.500 0.016 0.012 0.012
74/02/03 10 00 d.300 0.300 0.025 0.025 0.035
74/02/17 09 40 8.100 0.500 0.025 0.010 0.020
74/03/02 13 30 8.400 0.600 0.010 0.015 0.070
74/03/17 09 30 8.750 0.800 0.105 0.010 0.042
74/04/07 10 05 9.000 0.800 0.115 0.015 0.035
74/05/05 09 35 7.900 0.400 0.010 0.017 0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO E
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
I 74801
40 20 53.0 087 35 ?.0
UNNAMED CREEK
17 7.5 8ISMARK
T/LAKE VERMILION
2NDRY RD RDG 2.5 MI NNE OF ALVIN
I 1EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FLET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/03 10 15 9.300 3.490 0.110 0.069 0.300
73/07/07 11 00 8.900 3.300 0.094 0.120 0.o30
73/08/2b 08 30 2.100 8.200 0.305 0.157 1.550
73/09/09 10 00 0.460 1.470 0.420 0.126 0.855
73/10/13 08 30 1.200 8.750 1.000 2.000 2.900
73/11/03 09 30 0.760 2.100 O.4S0 0.105 0.390
73/12/01 10 15 5.500 0.600 0.044 0.192 0.280
74/01/06 08 55 10.000 0.500 0.014 0.012 0.020
74/02/03 08 55 .100 0.500 0.025 0.035 0.085
74/02/17 08 30 9.400 0.300 0.010 0.010 0.025
74/03/02 09 50 10.000 0.700 0.070 0.015 0.040
74/03/17 08 30 10.820 1.000 0.065 0.030 0.080
74/04/07 08 40 9.500 1.200 0.025 0.035 0.230
74/05/05 08 40 9.400 0.900 0.135 0.010 0.045

-------
STOi ET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
1748E1
40 23 41.0 087 34
UNNAMED CREEK
17 7.5 AMbIA
1/LAKE VERMILION
2NDRY RD BROG 0.6
1 LEPALES
MI E OF COLLEGE CORNER
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
‘.3.0
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS-DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
73/06/03
10
00
12.000
3.100
0.094
0.048
0.060
73/07/07
11
15
8.400
0.100K
0.014
0.011
0.020
73/08/26
08
48
2.200
0.560
0.086
0.014
0.045
73/09/09
10
25
1.320
1.260
0.230
0.020
0.045
73/10/13
08
42
2.500
1.000
0.084
0.034
0.060
73/11/03
10
00
3.400
5.800
0.084
0.027
1.550
73/12/01
10
45
8.000
0.100K
0.012
0.024
0.180
74/01/06
09
15
10.400
0.250
0.012
0.008
0.015
74/02/03
09
05
9.800
0.400
0.025
0.015
0.030
74/02/17
08
50
9.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.020
74/03/02
10
10
9.900
0.500
0.025
0.010
0.030
74/03/17
08
45
11.800
0.600
0.035
0.0 10
0.02
74/04/07
09
55
11.200
0.500
0.025
0.020
0.035
74/05/05
08
55
9.100
0.400
0.020
0.016
0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INOICgTED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
1748F1
40 23 41.0 087 34 25.0
MIDDLE BI ANCH
17 7.5 AMBIA
1/LAKE VERMILION
2NDRY WD t ROG 0.9
1 1EPALES
4
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTh
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
P1-105—015
P1-lOS-TOT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P -
MI E OF COLLEGE CORNER
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
73/06/03
10
10
10.000
0.110
0.038
0.016
0.030
73/07/07
11
10
8.400
0.350
0.025
0.009
0.030
73/08/26
08
45
1.620
0.480
0.063
0.007
0.040
74/09/09
10
20
0.460
1.380
0.110
0.012
0.050
73/10/13
08
40
1.700
1.750
0.078
0.048
0.110
73/11/03
09
50
1.820
0.950
0.082
0.020
0.300
73/12/01
10
35
7.300
0,100K
0.032
0.020
0.185
74/01/06
09
10
11.200
0.400
0.012
0.012
0.020
74/02/03
09
10
10.600
0.800
0.080
0.035
0.085
74/02/17
9.900
1.700
0.060
0.010
0.020
74/03/02
10
05
10.900
1.200
0.020
0.010
0.045
74/03/17
08
40
11.200
0.400
0.015
0.010
0.035
74/04/07
09
50
11.200
1.000
0.020
0.025
0.080
74/0 5/05
08
50
9.800
0.800
0.090
0.010
0.03S
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
SToREr RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23
174861
40 25 35.0 081 41 07.0
UNNAMED STREAM
17 7.5 HOOP€.STON
1/LAKE VERMILION
ST RD #1 3ROG 2.5 MI SW OF HOOPESTON
I IEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L ‘4G/L M&/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/03 09 35 9.800 0.560 0.066 0.014 0.030
73/07/07 12 00 8.000 0.690 0.032 0.011 0.0 0
73/08/26 09 20 3.600 0.140 0.036 0.006 0.030
73/09/0 11 45 1.100 0.030 0.007 0.030
73/10/13 09 15 3.200 1.340 0.052 0.024 0.115
73/11/03 13 30 4.500 0.350 0.020 0.015 0.150
73/12/01 13 05 7.980 0.100K 0.012 0.020 0.180
74/01/06 09 45 8.400 0.012 0.012
74/02/03 09 45 7.800 1.000 0.070 0.015 0.045
74/02/17 09 30 7.300 2.100 0.080 0.010 0.050
74/03/02 13 00 8.400 0.700 0.010 0.010 0.050
74/03/17 09 20 8.150 1.000 0.015 0.025 0.105
74/04/07 08 S5 8.500 0.700 0.020 0.015 0.015
74/05/05 09 25 7.100 0.700 0.150 0.005K 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO E
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------