U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
KEfiTUCKY LAKE
HARDIN, DECATUR, WAYNE, PERRY, BENTON,
HUMPHREYS, HOUSTON, HENRY, AND
STEWART COUNTIES, TENNESSE
GALLOWAY, TRIGG, MARSHALL, LYQN,
AND LIVINGSTON COUNTIES, KEMUCKY
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 354
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
KENTUCKY LAKE
HARDIN, DECATUR, WAYNE, PERRY, BENTON,
HUMPHREYS, HOUSTON, HENRY, AND
STEWART COUNTIES, TENNESSE
GALLOWAY, TRIGG, MARSHALL, LYON,
AND LIVINGSTON COUNTIES, KENTUCKY
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 354
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH,
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
AND THE
TENNESSEE AND KENTUCKY NATIONAL GUARDS
OCTOBER 1976
-------
REPORT ON KENTUCKY LAKE
HARDIN, DECATUR, WAYNE, PERRY, BENTON, HUMPHREYS,
HOUSTON, HENRY, AND STEWART COUNTIES, TENNESSEE
CALLOWAY, TRIGG, MARSHALL, LYON, AND LIVINGSTON COUNTIES, KENTUCKY
EPA REGION IV
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 354
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
October 1976
-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Study Lakes - Tennessee and Kentucky iv-v
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi-vii
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 7
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 9
IV. Nutrient Loadings 16
V. Literature Reviewed 24
VI. Appendices 25
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoi rs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed Into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
lannin9 [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
1 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
•}1 1
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by
lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and to augment plans implementation by the
states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Tennessee Department
of Public Health and the Kentucky Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Protection for professional involvement, to the
Tennessee and Kentucky National Guards for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those Tennessee wastewater
treatment plant operators who provided effluent samples and flow
data.
The staff of the Division of Water Quality Control, Tennessee
Department of Public Health; the Division of Environmental
Planning, Tennessee Valley Authority; the Nashville District Corps
of Engineers; and the Kentucky Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General William C. Smith, former Adjutant General of
Tennessee, and Project Officer Colonel Wilburn C. Johnson, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Tennessee National Guardsmen;
Major General Richard L. Frymire, and Project Officers Lt. Colonel
Thomas Buyher, Jr. and Lt. Colonel David B. May, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Kentucky National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
LAKE NAME
Bark ley
Boone
Cheatham
Cherokee
Chi ckamauga
Doug 1 as
Fort Loudon
Great Falls
Ni ckajack
Old Hickory
Percy Priest
Reel foot
South Hoiston
Tims Ford
Watts Bar
COUNTY
Stewart, Montgomery
(Trigg, Lyon in KY)
Washington, Sullivan,
Carter
Cheatham, Davidson
Jefferson, Hamblen,
Grainger, Hawkins
Hamilton, Rhea, Meigs,
McMi nn
Sevier, Jefferson, Cocke
Loudon, Knox, Blount
White, Van Buren
Marion, Hamilton
Sumner, Davidson, Wilson,
Smith, Trousdale
Davidson, Rutherford
Obion
Sullivan (Washington in
VA)
Moore, Franklin
Rhea, Meigs, Cumberland,
Roane, Loudon
Franklin, Coffee
Woods (Elk River)
-------
V
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF KENTUCKY
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Barren River Reservoir Allen, Barren
Lake Cumberland Pulaski, McCreary, Russell,
Wayne, Clinton
Dale Hollow Reservoir Cumberland, Clinton (Clay,
Pickett, Overton in TN)
Herrington Lake Boyle, Mercer, Garrard
Kentucky Lake Marshall, Lyon, Trigg,
Livingston, Calloway (Hardin,
Decatur, Wayne, Perry, Benton,
Humphreys, Houston, Henry, and
Stewart in TN)
-------
KENTUCKY LAKE
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
3 O
KENTUCKY
TENNESSEE
TENN.
Map Location
-------
vii
Map Location
øHopkinsvi ll .
BowI ing Groan
KENTUCKY
TENNESSEE - — — — —
Murfreesboro
• Fny.tts iIIe
TENNESSEE
ALABAMA
KENTUCKY LAKE
Tributary S np1ing Site
lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
2P 3.0 4 O Op Op
-------
REPORT ON KENTUCKY LAKE, TENNESSEE AND KENTUCKY
STORET NO. 2104
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Kentucky Lake is classified as eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and highly productive, on the basis of field observations
and Survey data. Whether such nutrient enrichment is to be
considered beneficial or deleterious is determined by its
actual or potential impact upon designated beneficial water
uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a values ranged from 1.4 jig/i in the spring
to 38.7 jig/i in the fail, with a mean of 9.1 jig/i. Potentials
for primary production as measured by algal assay control
yields were high at all stations. Of the 16 Tennessee lakes
sampled, only three had higher median total phosphorus levels
(0.072 mg/i), four had higher median inorganic nitrogen values
(0.520 mg/i), and three had higher median orthophosphorus
levels (0.030 mg/i) than Kentucky Lake. Only one lake in
Kentucky sampled in 1973 had higher median nutrient levels
than Kentucky Lake.
Survey limnologists reported high algal concentrations at
Stations 8-13 and 17 during the May sampling round.
-------
2
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Kentucky Lake was limited
by available phosphorus at sampling Stations 6-16 and colimited
by both phosphorus and nitrogen at Stations 1-5. In all assays,
simultaneously added spikes of the nutrients resulted in maximum
growth response. Mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P)
ratios in sampled waters suggest phosphorus limitation in the
spring (ranging from 16/1 to 53/1) but nitrogen or dual limitation
in the summer and fall (ratios from 6/1 to 13/1). The persistent
low water transparency probably exerts greater control over pri-
mary production in Kentucky Lake than do the nutrients. The
chlorophyll a values noted are low relative to what one would ex-
pect based upon the high algal assay control yields, suggesting
light limitations in the natural system.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
During the sampling year, the mean annual contribution
from known point sources was estimated to be about 1 .0% of the
total loading reaching Kentucky Lake. The city of Paris con-
tributed a total of about 0.4% from four wastewater treatment
plants, and the city of Savannah contributed 0.2%. Total
elimination of measured point sources impacting Kentucky Lake
would not be expected to alter the trophic state of the lake.
-------
3
There are also a number of additional sewage treatment
plants in the Kentucky Lake drainage basin which did not
participate in the Survey and are not included in the nutri-
ent budget for the lake. These include: Tennessee River Pulp
and Paper (Counce), Pickwick Landing State Park SIP, the
Henderson County schools (at Beaver, Scotts Hill, Sardis,
Southhaven, and Pin Oak), the Riverside school, Paris Landing
State Park SIP, Lakeshore Methodist Assembly (Eva), H.I.S.
Sportswear (Bruceton), Scotts Hill Sportswear, two 1-40 Rest
Areas, and a number of other industrial sources (Tennessee
Department of Public Health, 1976). Although the above dis-
charges are all minor, it is not known at this time whether
their combined nutrient impact is of consequence to the nutrient
budget of the lake.
Loading calculations for Kentucky Lake yield a net loss
of phosphorus. This export is probably due to a peculiar
situation concerning the Duck River drainage system (see map,
page vii).
There was a gradual increase in phosphorus concentration
from the tailwater of Pickwick Dam to the Kentucky Lake Dam
with a large increase just downstream from the Duck River
outlet. This same trend was observed by Byre (1970) who
-------
4
attributed the increase to the fact that “the Duck River
receives the waste discharges from the second largest phos-
phate mining and processing complex in the United States.”
In addition to mining discharges, the Duck River contributes
substantial nonpoint phosphorus loading as a result of run-
off from drainage areas geologically rich in phosphate mineral
nutrients (S. Fishel, personal comunication).
The lake sampling site (No. 11) in ediately downstream
from the Duck River embayment shows a substantial increase in
total phosphorus concentration with depth. The lake inlet
station [ tributary site Q(l) just downstream from the Duck
River outlet] did not reflect this increase; however, this
sample was limited to the upper portion of the water column.
Apparently, the tributary sampling at this station [ Q(fl]
underestimated the nutrient loading for the inlet.
It would be expected that this abnormality in the inlet
sampling would be compensated for when nutrient loadings were
measured at the outlet. However, Tennessee Valley Authority
officials indicate that the intake for power production was
9 to 18 meters below the lake surface. Therefore, the water
sampled below the dam [ station B(l)] was water from the hypo-
limnion which was higher in nutrients than would be expected
if the entire water column were sampled. For example, the
-------
5
mean total phosphorus concentration at tributary station
B(l) was 0.087 mg/liter compared to 0.075 mg/liter for the
lake sample at Station 1 near the Kentucky Lake Dam. This
difference in concentration resulted in a higher phosphorus
export than was accounted for under the sampling procedures
of the lake watershed.
Additional tributary sampling and an intensive study of
the impact of the phosphate mining operation on the Duck River
watershed would aid in determining a nutrient budget for
Kentucky Lake.
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual contribution not attributable to nearby
point sources accounted for about 98.9% of the total phosphorus
load. The Tennessee River contributed 95.7% of the total load,
and ungaged tributaries were estimated to contribute 0.1%.
Included in this Tennessee River phosphorus contribution is
loading from the unmeasured Duck River drainage basin and
numerous upstream Tennessee River impoundments throughout
Alabama and eastern Tennessee.
An evaluation of the nutrient control requirements for
the upstream sources within the Tennessee River watershed is
needed in the future. As inorganic nutrients appear to be
present in excess of primary production requirements, substantial
-------
6
reduction in nutrients would be necessary to effect demon-
strable ambient water quality improvement.
-------
7
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized
below. Lake morphometry data and mean hydraulic retention
time were provided by the Tennessee Valley Authority. Tribu-
tary flow data were provided by the Tennessee and Kentucky
District Offices of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Tribu-
tary drainage areas plus the lake surface area do not equal the
outlet drainage area (probably) because of differences in the
pool elevation used by the different sources in their calcula-
tions. Precipitation values are estimated by methods as out-
lined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working Paper
No. 175 (1975). A table of metric/English conversions is in-
cluded as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 648.71 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 5.2 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 26.9 meters.
4. Volume: 7,560.120 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 22 days.
-------
8
B. Tributary and Outlet (see Appendix B for flow data):
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km 2 ) ( m 3 /sec )
C(2) 2.52
D(l) 0.13
E(l) 4.93
F(l) 0.47
G(l) 5.72
H(1) 23.84
J(l) 0.53
K(l) 0.43
L(l) 0.67
M(1) 0.28
N(1) 0.22
P(1) 2.85
Q(1) 1,731.10
R(l) 1.45
S(1) 0.68
T(1) 2.88
u(1) 4.24
V(1) 0.33
W(l) 0.97
X(l) 1.11
Y(1) 1.08
Z(1) 0.15
2. Outlets -
A(1) Barkley Canal 164.77
B(1) Tennessee River 104,117.9 1,696.34
Totals 104,117.9 1,861.11
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 170.5 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 117.6 centimeters.
Jonathan Creek 172.5
Ledbetter Creek (Leather Creek) 9.2
Blood River 336.7
Eagle Creek 32.4
West Sandy Creek 391.1
Big Sandy River 1,629.1
Crooked Creek 36.5
Little Sulphur Creek 29.3
Harmon Creek 45.6
Beaverdam Creek 19.3
Burnside Creek 15.2
Cypress Creek 194.5
Tennessee River at New Johnsonvf]le* 99,116.6
Trace Creek 99.2
Little Richiand Creek 46.6
Big Richiand Creek 197.1
Whiteoak Creek 290.1
Cane Creek 22.3
Hurricane Creek 66.0
Leatherwood Creek 75.6
Standing Rock Creek 74.1
Sulfur Creek io.i
Minor tributaries and
irr nediate drainage 505.0
Totals 103,414.1
6.87
1 ,793.45
*Station includes drainage area of the unsampled Duck River.
-------
9
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Kentucky Lake was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were
collected from 17 stations on the lake (sites 01, 03, 05, 07, 08,
and 17 were sampled all three sampling rounds; sites 02, 04, 06,
and 10 were sampled during spring and summer only; sites 09, 13,
and 15 were sampled during spring and fall; sites 11, 12, 14, and
16 were sampled during spring only) and from a number of depths
at each station (see maps). During each visit, depth-integrated
samples were collected from each station for chlorophyll a
analysis and phytoplankton identification and enumeration.
During the first visit, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were
composited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were as
follows:
Station Number Maximum Depth (meters )
1 21.0
2 11.0
3 19.8
4 19.2
5 18.0
6 18.6
7 3.7
8 5.8
9 20.4
10 14.9
11 16.2
12 15.8
13 14.9
14 11.3
15 11.3
16 11.3
17 13.7
-------
10
For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see
NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in 111 -A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton
counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in Ill-B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in Ill-C.
-------
rcENTUCKV LAcE
STO ET CODE 2106 A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR KENTUCKY LAKE
5/15/73 ) ( 8/13/73 ( 10/20/73
r .4t . MAX MAX
17 flL -T = 10 UEPT— 9 DEPTrI
4N(.,E A .3F
PA 4METEk N 0 AM,E M .D1AN (METE ’) N 0 ) ANGE M )iAN (METE ) s ) N 44NGE MEI)IAN (MET PS)
TE PE . Tj . E (DEG CL ..T
DE Ti 17 17.7— 20. . j9•9 0.0— 0.0 1’ ?1.2— 29.8 29.2 0.0— 1., 17 1 .8— 22.2 21.4 0.0— 1.5
MAX UE_TM** 17 17.2— 2G.1 19.8 4.3— 19.2 10 ?b.3— 29.4 28.9 2.’ — 19.8 9 15.7— 22.0 21.3 1.5— 1 i.9
OI SOLVEt) O YuLN (MG/LI
0.—1.S M 0E T 0 * ** ‘ 6.0— 17.6 6.8 0.0— ‘ 7.4 9.8 7.8 0.6— 1.s
MAX OEPTPI 00 17 4.2— 10.6 4•3 19.2 10 5.2— 12.0 6.4 2.4— 19.8 9 ‘.8— 9. 7.4 1.5— 18.9
C0NDUCT1VIT’ (U ’ )-1OS)
0.—1.5 OEPI, 1 11 5.— 190. 150. 0.0— 0.0 14 80.— 176. 170. 0.0— 1.5 17 40.— 160. 146. 0.0— 1.5
MAX CLMTrI** 17 55.— 168. 150. 4.3— 19.2 10 73. 176. 169. 2.4— 19.M 9 39. 160. 148. 1. — 18.9
Ps - , (cTANDA O UNITS)
o. —1.s p fl [ kT., 17 6.7— 8.0 7.7 0.0— 0.0 1’ 7.0— 7.9 7.’ 0.0 1.5 18 7.4 8.6 7.5 0.0 1.5
MAA DEI.Ts- 5 00 17 7. ’ .— 7.9 7 . ’ 4.3— 19.2 10 7.0— 7.8 1.5 2.4— 19.8 9 7.3— 7.8 7.4 1.5— 18.9
TOTAL ALP’ALII.dTY (PdG/L)
0.—1.5 -s r)EPT -s 17 16.— 61. S . 0.0— 0.0 1’ 20.— 59. 56. 0.0— 1.5 i Fs 12.— 64. 57. 0.0— 1.5
5 -’AX DEPTr1* 17 lb.— 61. 54. 4 3— 19.2 10 20.— 60. 56. 2.4— 19.8 9 12.— 65. 59. 1.5— 18.’
TOTAL P (s- G/L)
0.—1 .5 M )E-’TrI 1, 0.046—0.110 0.066 0.0— 0.0 14 0.046—0.0s3 0.070 0.0— 1.5 18 0.055—0.095 0.079 0.0— 1.5
MAX DE,. Tr1** 17 0.0S00.?bO 0.079 4.3 19.2 10 0.044-0.112 0.072 2.4 19.8 9 0.0 58_O.1i3 0.082 1.5— 18.9
DIScOLVED O TM0 P (MG/LI
s- I 0EPTri 17 t).007—O.038 0.030 0.0— 0.0 14 0.007—0.041 0.028 0.0— 1.5 18 0.010—0.049 0.041 0.0— 1.5
MAX 1)EPTr l** 17 0.006—0.035 0.029 4.3 19.2 10 0.007—0.037 0.024 2.4— 19.8 9 0.010—0.047 0.040 1.5— 18.9
NO2.N03 ( G/L)
s pi ,-. 11 s.o 0—o..o 0.510 0.0— 0.0 14 p.110—0.330 0.1s 0.0— 1.5 0.030—0.470 0.360 0.0— 1.5
TM AX DE Tss*0 17 0.090—0.550 0.510 4.3— 19.2 10 0.090—0.330 0.190 2.4— 19.8 9 0.040—0.460 0.160 1.5— 18.9
AMMOf 14 ( (‘/L
G.—1.5 r)Ei- Tri 17 0.060—0.130 0.OAu 0.0— 0.0 14 0.070—0.140 0.090 0.0- 1.5 18 0.030—0.070 0.050 0.0— 1.5
MAX OEPTs-,* 17 0.080—0.900 0.080 4.3 19.2 10 0.060—0.180 0.090 2.4— 19.8 9 0.040—0.070 0.050 1.5— 18.9
PcJELUAHL t
fl._j.5 ‘ ‘)E. -1 17 0.200—0.800 ‘).400 0.0— 0.0 14 0.300—1.200 0.800 0.0— 1.5 lsi 0.200—1.000 0.350 0.0— 1.,
MAX OEPTFs** 17 0.?00—0.400 0.300 4.3— 19.2 10 0.200—0.300 0.500 2.4— 19.8 9 0.200—1.000 0.200 1.5— 18.9
51CC-Si DISC (s-ETEP’ )
17 0.5— 1.2 0.9 10 0.5— 1.7 1.1 9 0.5— 1.9 0.9
N = NO. OF SAMPLES
00 MAXIMIJS4 OEPIs-4 AM .’L D AT LACH SITE
5 = NO. OF SITES SAMI’LtL) ON ThIS DATE
-------
12
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Algal
Sampling Dominant Units
Date Genera per ml
05/15/73 1. Melosira 4,877
(Sites 01-10) 2. Flagellates* 2,418
3. Stephanodiscus 551
4. Pennate diatom 112
5. Mallomonas 112
Other genera 288
Total 8,358
05/15/73 1. Melosjra 1,099
(Sites 11-17) 2. Flagellates* 1,089
3. Stephanodiscus 149
4. Nitzschia 117
5. Pennate diatom 53
Other genera . 108
Total 2,615
08/13/73 1. Melosira 2,033
2. Flagellates* 913
3. Oscillatoria 884
4. Lyngbya 766
5. Stephanodiscus 295
Other genera 1,090
Total 5,981
10/20/73 1. Oscillatoria 2,943
2. Melosira 1,237
3. Flagellates* 853
4. Nitzschia 853
5. Anabaena 640
Other genera 1,238
Total 7,764
*Jncludes all flagellated genera.
-------
13
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/liter )
05/15/73 1 5.9
2
3 6.8
4 5.4
5 4.5
6 5.7
7 27.8*
8 12.7
9 9.1
10 10.1
11 5.7
12 4.4
13 3.5
14 1.7
15 1.6
16 1.4
17 5.1
08/13/73 1 11.0
2 15.6
3 9.3
4 7.6
5 13.5
6 5.3
7 25.0*
8 19.4
10 4.4
17 7.0
10/20/73 1 4.7
3 6.9
5 5.1
7 38.7*
8 21.0
9 3.1
13 1.4
15 2.3
17 5.4
*It should be noted that Station 7 is shallow and located just
downstream from the five Paris sewage treatnent plants.
-------
14
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Site Nos .
01, 02, 03
Spike ( mg/i )
Control
0.05 p
0.05 p + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
0.032
0.082
0.082
0.032
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
0.488
0.488
1 .488
1 .488
Maximum yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
6.9
7.0
13.9
6.5
14, 15, 16
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
0.028
0.078
0.078
0.028
0.024
0.074
0.074
0.024
0.050
0.100
0. 100
0.050
0.028
0.078
0.078
0.028
0.498
0.498
1 .498
1 .498
0.428
0.428
1 .428
1 .428
0.530
0.530
1.530
1.530
0.564
0.564
1.564
1 .564
5.6
6.4
17.5
6.4
5.4
7.6
21.6
5.6
6.0
13.9
21.1
5.0
8.4
16.7
22.5
8.2
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
04, 05
06, 07, 08, 09
10, ii, 12, 13
-------
15
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the algal assay, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum , indicate that the potential for primary production
in Kentucky Lake was high at the time of spring sampling. In
the assays for Station 1-5, no significant growth response was
noted with the addition of either nitrogen or phosphorus alone,
but was observed with the simultaneous addition of both nutri-
ents, suggesting colimitation by nitrogen and phosphorus. In
assays for lake Stations 6-16, increases in yield with the
addition of phosphorus suggest phosphorus limitation.
The N/P ratios in the field data ranged from 16/1 to 53/1
in the spring samples, suggesting phosphorus limitation, but
from 6/1 to 13/1 during summer and fall samplings, indicating
nitrogen or dual limitation at those times.
The Tennessee Department of Public Health (S. Fishel, per-
sonal communication) indicates that the Kentucky Lake river
system contains an excess of phosphorus and that nutrient is
generally not considered to be growth limiting in the reservoir.
He states that the major limiting factors in Kentucky Lake are
1) the short retention time of this rnainstem impoundment,
2) background water turbidity from colloidal particles, and
3) availability of nitrogen (limiting to green algae in the
late summer).
-------
16
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Tennessee and
Kentucky National Guards collected monthly near-surface grab sam-
ples from each of the tributary sites indicated on the maps (pages
vi and vii), except for the high runoff months of February and
July when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in March
1973, and was completed in March 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were pro-
vided by the Tennessee and Kentucky District Offices of the USGS
for the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of the USGS computer program
for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for
tributaries are those measured minus known point source loads, if
any. Nutrient loading estimates for Barkley Canal [ Station A(l)]
were derived by multiplying the mean normalized flow by the mean
annual concentration. The mean annual concentration was obtained
from the values observed at Station 24OlAl (Kentucky Lake) and
Station 47OlV1 (Barkley Lake). Concentrations for each sampling
date are shown in Appendix D.
-------
17
Although the lake samples included sites (11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, and 17) above New Johnsonvjlle [ tributary site Q(l)], the
most representative loading estimates were obtained when site Q(l)
was considered Kentucky Lake inlet. For example, when Pickwick Dam
was considered the inlet, a very large imbalance in total phosphorus
was seen. This is believed to be due to the influence of the unsam-
pled and therefore unmeasured loading of the Duck River drainage
system (see map, page vii). Evidence of this Duck River impact is
seen from comparisons of the mean total phosphorus values of the
three lake sampling sites immediately downstream from the Duck River
embayment (mean total phosphorus = 0.082 mg/i) with the three sam-
pling sites imediately upstream from the embayment (mean total
phosphorus = 0.056 mg/i).
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “miror tributaries and mime—
diate drainage” (“U” of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /yr, for Ledbetter Creek, Eagle
Creek, Crooked Creek, Beaverdam Creek, Burnside Creek, Little Rich-
land Creek, Big Richiand Creek, Whiteoak Creek, Cane Creek, Leather-
wood Creek, and Standing Rock Creek at Stations D(l), F(1), J(l),
M(1), N(l), S(l), 1(1), U(l), V(i), X(l), and Y(l), and by multiply-
ing the means by the ZZ area in km 2 .
-------
18
The operators of the Waverly, Paris (four plants), New
Johnsonville, Bruceton, and Parsons wastewater treatment plants
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
Nutrient loads for the cities of Paris (Celotex), Tennessee Ridge
(two plants), Camden, Savannah, Adamsville, Decatursville (two
plants), and Lexington wastewater treatment plants were estimated
at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
-------
19
A Waste Sources.
Known municipal -
Population Mean Flow
Name Servedt Treatmentt ( m 3 /d x iO ) Receiving Water
Waverly 3,780 1. 1.824 Trace Creek
Paris (Main) 5,700 1. 5.678 Town Creek/Bailey Fork Creek/
Holly Fork Creek/West Sandy
Creek
Paris Lagoon #2 3,700 2. 2.226 Bailey Fork Creek/West Sandy
Creek
Paris Lagoon #3* 94 2. 0.174 ClIfty Creek/West Sandy Creek
(Emerson Electric)
Paris (Celotex)* 300 2. 0.114** Bailey Fork Creek/West Sandy
Creek
Paris Lagoon #5 900 2. 0.242 Bailey Fork Creek/West Sandy
Creek
New Johnsonville 1,200 2. 0.678 North Indian Creek
Bruceton 1,500 2. 1.045 Cherry Creek/Big Sandy River
Parsons 1,523 3. 1.382 Bear Creek/Beech River
Tennessee Ridge #1 100 2. 0 038** South Fork Hurricane Creek
Tennessee Ridge #2 200 2. 0.076** Cane Creek
Camden 1,145 3. 0.433** Cane Creek/Cypress Creek
Savannahs #l-#4 6,000*** 2. 2.27l** Horse Creek
Adamsvi lle 1,400 2. 0.530** Dollar Creek/Beason Creek
Decatursv’ille #1 75 2. 0.028** Rushing Creek
Decatursville #2 435 2. 0.165** Rushing Creek
Lexington #1-#3 4,790*** 2. l.813** Beech River
2 Known industrial - See footnote *
Key: 1. Activated sludge
2. Stabilization pond
3. Trickling filter
-I-Sewage treatment plant questionnaires and/or Tennessee Department of Public Health, 1976
t Plants have portion of waste load contributed by industry. The Celotex plant manufactures
pressboard paneling, and the Paris #3 plant receives effluent from the manufacture of
power saws.
**Est,mated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
***Total populations served by four and three stabilization ponds, respectively.
-------
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading Average Year
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpo int load) -
C(2) Jonathan Creek 6,585 0 1
D(1) Ledbetter Creek (Leather Creek) 105 <0.1
E(1) Blood River 20,510 0.5
F(l) Eagle Creek 635 <0.1
G(l) West Sandy Creek 6,650 0.1
H(l) Big Sandy River 75,565 1 6
J(I) Crooked Creek 140 <0.1
K(1) Little Sulfur Creek 110 <0.1
L(l) Harmon Creek 180 <0 1
M(1) Beaverdam Creek 90 <0 1
N(1) Burnside Creek 140 <0.1
P(l) Cypress Creek 26,265 0.6
Q(l) Tennessee River at 4,395,865 95 6
New Johnsonville
R(l) Trace Creek 3,610 0.1
S(1) Little Richland Creek 310 <0.1
T(1) Big Richland Creek 1,170 <0.1
U(1) Whiteoak Creek 2,250 0.1
V(1) Cane Creek 190 <0 1
W(l) Hurricane Creek 195 <0.1
X(l) Leatherwood Creek 425 <0.1
Y(l) Standing Rock Creek 775 <0 1
Z(l) Sulfur Creek 40 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries and inwiiediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 4,040 0 1
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Waverly 3,270 0.1
Paris Main 6,350 0.1
Paris Lagoon #2 4,545 0.1
Paris Lagoon #3 3,230 0 1
Paris Celotex 340 <0.1
Paris Lagoon #5 590 <0.1
New Johnsonville 1,120 <0.1
Bruceton 1,635 <0.1
Parsons 2,710 0 1
Tennessee Ridge #1 115 <0.1
Tennessee Ridge #2 225 <0.1
Camden 1,300 <0.1
Savannah(s) #1—#4 6,805 0.2
Adamsvi lle 1,590 <0.1
Decatursville #1 85 <0 1
Decatursville #2 495 <0.1
Lexington #1-#3 5,430 0.1
d. Septic tanks* — 300 <0.1
e. Known industrialt
f. Direct precipitation** - 11,350 0.3
Totals 4,597,330 100.0
2. Outputs -
A(1) Barkley Canal 519,620
B(l) Tennessee River 4,709,110
Total 5,228,730
3. Net annual P exporttt 631 ,400
*Estimate based on 734 lakeshore residences, 17 camps, 20 resorts, 3 parks
**Estlmated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
tlndustrial wastes included with domestic wastes.
ttExport probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
21
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
C(2) Jonathan Creek 64,140 0.1
D(l) ledbetter Creek (Leather Creek) 5,595 <0 1
E(1) Blood River 255,250 0.4
F(l) Eagle Creek 8,210 <0.1
G(l) West Sandy Creek 138,585 0.2
H(1) Big Sandy River 812,955 1.1
J(l) Crooked Creek 8,630 <0.1
K(l) Little Sulfur Creek 3,620 <0.1
L(l) Harmon Creek 17,350 <0.1
M(l) Beaverdam Creek 5,075 <0.1
N(l) Burnside Creek 5,640 <0.1
P(l) Cypress Creek 113,695 0.2
Q(l) Tennessee River at 70,634,800 96.0
New Johnsonville
R(1) Trace Creek 37,270 0.1
5(1) Little Richland Creek 13,795 <0.1
T(l) Big Richland Creek 57,640 0.1
U(1) Whiteoak Creek 63,030 0.1
V(1) Cane Creek 5,955 <0.1
W(1) Hurricane Creek 15,720 <0.1
X(l) Leatherwood Creek 30,280 <0.1
Y(1) Standing Rock Creek 40,135 0.1
Z(l) Sulfur Creek 2,865 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 171,700 0 2
c. Known municipal STPs -
Waverly 4,320 <0.1
Paris Main 27,420 <0 1
Paris Lagoon #2 8,895 <0.1
Paris Lagoon #3 650 <0.1
Paris Celotex 1,020 <0.1
Paris Lagoon #5 1 ,080 <0.1
New Johnsonville 1,750 <0.1
Bruceton 3,675 <0.1
Parsons 4,360 <0.1
Tennessee Ridge #1 340 <0.1
Tennessee Ridge #2 680 <0.1
Camden 3,895 <0.1
Savannah(s) #1-#4 20,405 <0.1
Adamsvil le 4,760 <0.1
Decatursville #1 255 <0.1
Decatursville #2 1,480 <0 1
Lexington #1-#3 16,290 z0 1
d. Septic tanks* - 11,255 <0.1
e. Known industrial** -
f. Direct precipltatlon*** - 700,345 1.0
Totals 73,324,810 100.0
2 Outputs —
A(1) Barkley Canal 6,365,330
B(1) Tennessee River 64,845,090
Total 71,210,420
3. Net annual N accumulation - 2,114,390
*Estlmate based on 734 lakeshore residences, 17 camps, 20 resorts, 3 parks.
**Industrial wastes Included with domestic wastes.
***Est,mated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
22
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
*Background levels for these tributaries probably inflated by
unknown point sources upstream.
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
C(2) Jonathan Creek
38
372
D(l) Ledbetter Creek (Leather Creek) 11
608
E(l) Blood River
61*
758
F(l) Eagle Creek
20
253
G(l)
West Sandy Creek
17
354
H(l)
Big Sandy River
46
499
J(l)
Crooked Creek
4
237
K(1)
Little Sulfur Creek
4
124
L(1)
Harmon Creek
4
380
M(l) Beaverdam Creek
N(l) Burnside Creek
P(l) Cypress Creek
Q(l) Tennessee River
R(1) Trace Creek
S(l) Little Richland Creek
T(l) Big Richiand Creek
U(l) Whiteoak Creek
V(l) Cane Creek
W(l) Hurricane Creek
X(1) Leatherwood Creek
Y(l) Standing Rock Creek
Z(l) Sulfur Creek
5
9
135*
44
36
7
6
8
8
3
6
10
4
263
371
585
713
376
296
292
217
267
238
400
542
284
-------
23
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his “eutrophic” loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his “oligotrophic” loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphornetry permitted. A “mesotrophic” loading would be con-
sidered one between “eutrophic” and “oligotrophic”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to water
bodies with short hydraulic retention times or in which light
penetration is severely restricted from high concentrations of
suspended solids in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m 2 /yr)
Estimated loading for Kentucky Lake 7.09
Vollenweider’s “eutrophic” loading 1.77
Vollenweider’s “oligotrophic” loading 0.88
-------
24
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Brye, Bruce A. 1970. “Summary of Observed Nutrient Concentrations
and Nutrient Entrapment in TVA Reservoirs.” pp. 34-51. In: TVA
Activities Related to Study and Control of Eutrophication in the
Tennessee Valley. National Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle
Shoals, Alabama. April 1970.
Fishel, Stephen H. 1976. Personal communication. Tennessee Depart-
ment of Public Health, Division of Water Quality Control, Nashville,
Tennessee.
Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1976. Water Quality Manage-
ment Plan for the Tennessee River - Western Valley Basin. (prelimi-
nary report). Nashville, Tennessee.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophication
Survey Methods 1973—1976. Working Paper No. 175. National Environ-
mental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Pacific Northwest
Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special Reference
to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol.
37:53-84.
-------
25
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Ilectares x 2.471 = acres
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x l0 acre feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 inches
Kilograms x 2.205 pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
Tk1. uTA Y L0* INFOHMATION F0 ctNTUCKY
3/ 5/ 75
LAPE CODE ?10
KENrucky LAKE
TOTAL [ , ‘AtN ,E Ap A OF LA E(StJ PcM) 10411 1.9
10411 7.
1O34 .4
TOTAL FLOW LU =
TOTAL FLOW OUT
19611 • 18
20407 .93
NOTE SITE 21O4Al4701V1——NEGATIVE NUMBE .O ANE FLOwS OUT OF TIE LAKE
MEAN MONTrILY FLOWS AND DAILY FLO (CMS1
TPIBIJTAPY MONT#
VEAN MEAN FLOW JAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW (JAY
FLOW
( J J Aj
NONMALILELI FLOwS(CMS
TRI80TARY
AkEA(S
icH)
JA J
FEB
M - (
AF-
MAY
JuN JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
2104A1
0.0
—339.80
—225.25
— 1 .J2
35.11
— 2.51
—67.96 —113.55
—15’..33
—126.29
—198.22
—280.05
—263.91
—164.77
21O’ l
1O4117.
2367.29
2561.78
2973.21
2271.01
1749.98
1107.19 1186.’.8
1144.00
957.11
982.59
1160.99
1846.26
1696.34
2104C1
83.9
2.Ss
2.1
2.22
1.57
j , 17
0.71 0.61
0.49
0.51
0.43
1.00
1.37
1.23
2104C2
172.5
5.24
4.45
4.56
3.23
2.41
1.46 1.25
1.01
1.0W
0.88
2.05
2.81
2.52
210401
9.2
0.28
0.24
0.24
0.17
0.13
0.08 0.07
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.11
0.15
0.13
2104€1
336.7
10.22
8.66
8.92
6.31
4.70
2.86 2.44
1.98
2.03
1.72
3.99
.49
4.93
2106F1
32.4
0.99
0.84
0.96
0.61
0.45
0.27 0.23
0.19
0.20
0.17
0.39
0.53
0.47
2104G1
391.1
11.89
10.08
10.34
1.33
5.47
3.31 2.83
2.29
2.36
1.99
4.64
6.37
5.72
2104h1
1629.1
49.55
41.91
43.04
30.58
22.77
13.82 11.81
9.57
9.83
8.30
19.37
26.59
23.84
2104J1
36.5
1.11
0.94
0.97
0.69
0.51
0.i1 0.26
0.21
0.22
0.19
0.43
0.59
0.53
2104p<1
10.1
0.31
0.26
0.27
0.19
0.14
0.09 0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.12
0.16
0.15
210411
45.6
1.38
1.17
1.21
O.8b
0.64
0.39 0.33
0.27
0.27
0.23
0.54
0.74
0.67
21 04u1
2104N1
19.3
15.2
0.59
0.46
0.50
0.39
0.51
0.40
O.3b
0.28
0.27
0.21
0.16 0.14
0.13 0.11
0.11
0.09
0.12
0.09
0.10
0.08
0.23
0.18
0.31
0.25
0.2)4
0.22
2104P 1
194.5
5.92
5.01
5.1’
3.65
2.72
1.65 1.41
1.14
1.17
0.99
2.31
3.17
2.85
210401
99116.6
2514.54
2749.57
2973.27
1897.23
1628.22
1146.63 1203.47
1200.63
991.09
1056.22
1325.23
2135.09
1731.10
2104P1
99.2
1.53
3.03
2.72
2.14
0.59 0.52
0.74
0.22
0.22
0.67
2.19
1.45
2104S1
46.6
0.72
1.43
1.36
1.28
1.01
0.28 0.24
0.35
0.10
0.10
0.31
1.03
0.68
210411
197.1
3.06
6.03
5.78
.41
4.25
1.18 1.04
1.48
0.44
0.44
1.33
4.36
2.88
2104 1J1
290.1
4,47
8.86
8.50
7.96
6.26
1.73 1.52
2.17
0.65
0,65
1.95
6.40
4.24
?10411
22.3
0.35
0.68
0.65
0.61
0.4k
0.13 0.12
0.17
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.49
0.33
2104w1
66.0
1.02
2.02
1.93
1.81
1.43
0.39 0.35
0.49
0.15
0.15
0.44
1.46
0.97
2104X1
75.5
1.11
2.31
2.21
2.08
1.63
0.45 0.40
0.57
0.17
0.17
0.51
1.67
1.11
210’v I
74.1
1.15
2.27
2.17
2.03
1.60
0.44 0.39
0.56
0.17
0.17
0.50
1.64
1.08
210’ZZ
505.0
10.87
12.54
13.22
10.93
8.44
3.43 2.97
3.17
1.9b
1.74
4.42
9.12
6.87
210411
0.0
0.89
0.75
0.71
0.55
0.41
0.25 0.21
0.17
0.18
0.15
0.35
0.48
0.43
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUV OF
DRAINAGE AQEA OF
SU 4—ORAIr..AG
LA cE =
A EAS =
210 4 A 1
3
73
—286.00
31
642.79
4
73
36.81
5
73
—148.38
6
—258.25
6
73
2931.93
7
73
—215.77
9
—272.41
8
13
—221.44
14
— 08.S1
73
—198.22
?7
—112.42
10
73
—88.35
11
73
—286.00
11
—209.54
12
73
—410.59
1
(4
122.90
13
715.88
2
74
—330.46
3
59.75
3
74
—202.49
iF ’
—331.31
25
—94 .86
-------
Tk1 ijTA y rLO, INFO .?MLTjON FOk r ENTuCKy
3I ‘ 75
LA I- CODE 2104
Ei’ TuC cY LAiF
EAr MONTrILY FLO S AND DAILY FLU S(C ” )
fLU L)AY fLO O Y FLO.
25 1203.’..7
14
o •
• 89
0 • 55
2 • 32
1MI5’JTA y
or r-
YE4
FLU.
L’AY
2Io4 l
3
13
125.35
31
4
7J
36.76
5
73
3171.49
6
6
73
2931.93
3511.25
7
73
1427.17
e3
73
1174.87
14
1’ 46.99
73
948.61
77
10
73
925.96
10 58.?2
11
73
1319.56
11
12
73
3256.44
866.50
1
74
7458.
11
2
74
6045.64
3
10918.98
3
74
2475.74
16
2104C1
.3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1’)
11
12
1
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
10
11
12
I
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
5.4
9
1(1
11
12
1
2
3
73
73
73
73
73
73
13
73
73
73
74
74
14
73
13
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
(4
7’+
73
(1
73
73
7.3
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
3.7’.
5.i
2.61
1.49
0.84
0.81
fl.e,3
0.56
2.94
1.44
‘..84
1.84
1.a8
7.70
10.68
5.15
3.06
1.72
1.66
1.31
1.14
6.03
2.97
9.97
3.79
3.45
0.41
0.57
0.25
0.16
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.06
0.32
0.16
3.53
0.20
31
6
11
33
3
16
31
6
c
14
27
11
13
1
16
31
6
9
14
27
11
11
13
3
1424.34
.37
1.19
5.95
6.29
1.49
26.22
, . 3
5.80
0.26
0.28
0.06
0.32
0.06
0.o
0.08
1.41
0.31
5 ) • 59
21 04C2
210401
12.14
2 • 83
2 • 83
4.87
5.15
25
4.76
0.26
-------
T 1bUTA Y rLO jr FOkMAT1(JN f0p P( NTUCK’V 3/25/lb
L cE COL)E 210. cE’4TuCp Y LAi E
MEAN MOwTP- LY FLO s AND DAILY FL0 .S(CMS)
T9I8iJTA Y riO iTi YfA . .M . FLU )A’ FLU— L)A’? FLJg DAY FL0
2104E 1 3 73 1 .0t’ 31 Q. 9
4 13
5 73 1O. 6 10.u-,
8 7 3
7 73 3.34 9 .33 4.29
13 3.23 14 11.64
9 73 2.55 27 2.21
10 13 2.23
11 73 11.78 11
12 73 5.76 1 14.87
1 74 19.48 13 51.25
2 74 7.39 3 11.38
3 74 6.74 16 11.33
2104F 1 3 73 1.45
4 73 ?.00 ic 0.37
73 1.01 10 1.35
6 73 0.57 10 0.24
7 7.3 0.32 6 0.25
8 73 0.31 12 0.29
9 73 0. 5 8
10 13 0.21 13 0.20
11 13 1.13 10 0.24
12 7j 0.56 1 1.5’
7’. 1.87 1? 10.05
2 74 0.71 2 0.83 18 0.10
3 74 0.65 2 0.38 16 1.39
2104G1 3 73 17.50
4 73 24.21 15 4.42
73 12.15 10 16.28
6 73 6.94 10 2.94
7 73 3. i 3.00
e ii 3.77 12 3.51
9 13 2.97 8 3.00
10 73 2.59 13
11 73 13.68 1’) 2.89
12 73 6.71 1 18.63
1 74 22.63 12 121.46
2 74 P.61 2 10.05 16 . 1. 41
3 74 /. ? 7 4.62 It’ 13.17
2104 1- il 3 73
4 73 100.81 15 18.35
5 73 50.69 10 67.96
6 73 28.88 10 12.26
7 73 16.20 6 12.52
8 7j 15.b9 12 14.61
9 73 12.35 8 12.52
10 73 10.76 13 9.91
11 13 56.92 10 11.98
12 73 27. b 1 77.59
1 7 ’ . 94.30 12 505.74
2 74 35.68 2 41.91 lb 35.11
3 74 32.58 2 19.23 16 54.93
-------
T IbuTA. Y L(JI IN O MA11UN FOi. ,cENTUCI(Y
3/S/7 ,
LAKE. C0D 210’ ,c lJ1UCI’Y LArcE
MEAN MO9Tr,LY FLjp , AND DAILY FLO*S(CM )
TPIr iJTA—Y v0 T - l’tJh- iE .r’. FLOP. LO U4Y FLOE DAY FLu
21 04j1 3 13 j .63
4 73 2.26 15 0.41
73 1.13 10 1.52
7) 73 0.65 14)
1 73 0.34 7) 0.28
8 73 0.35 12 0.33
9 73 O. 8 0.2
10 73 0.24 13 0.22
11 73 1.28 14) 0.27
12 73 0.63 1 1.74 0.35
1 74 2.11 12 11.33
2 74 0.80 2 0.94 16 0.79
3 74 0.73 7 0.43 17) 1.23
2104 1 3 73 1.31
4 73 1.81 15 0.33
5 ii 0.91 14
7) 73 0.52 14 0.83
73 0.29 29 0.0
ii 0.28 ii 0.0
9 13 0.22 8 0.0
10 73 0.19 13 0.0
11 73 1.03 10 0.0
12 73 0.50 9 0.28
1 74 1.69 12 9.09
2 14 0.6’. 2 0.75 27 0.39
.3 74 0.59 10 0.41 28 0.37
2104L1 3 73 2.04
4 73 2.82 14 0.53
5 73 1.42 14 0.56
5 73 0.81 14 1.29
7 73 0.45 29 0.33
73 0.44 11 0.33
73 0.35 8 0.35
I ’) ii 0.30 13 0.28
11 13 1.59 11 0.32
12 73 0.78 9 0.44
1 7’. 2.64 12 1’.16
2 1 ’ . 1.00 10 1.17 0. 0
3 14 fl.y1 10 0.63 0.70
2104 1 3 73 0.8
4 73 1.19 14 0.23
S 73 0.60 14 0.24
7) 73 0.34 14 0.55
7 73 0.19 29 0.14
8 73 0.19 11 0.14
9 73 0.15 8 0.15
10 13 0.13 13 0.12
11 73 0.67 11 0.13
12 73 0.33 9
1 14 1.12 12 6.00
2 74 0.42 10 0.50 27 0.26
3 74 0.39 10 0.27 28 0.30
-------
1 Ir,UT .P Y FLW. 1r F0R, ATIuN FUN cEp TuCrCy
3/25/75
LA c CODE 2Ifl
\IJC Y LA E
MEAN : 0 .T,-LY L0 Af’ L) DAILY FLOAS(Ct4s)
T 1&JTaP T
0 T Y u-
MEAN Lu
, ‘V
VLIJ DAY
FL DAY
FLoW
2J04 1
73
0. ”
4
73
0.4’.
14
0.1
‘5
73
0.47
14
t .1i
‘5
13
0.27
14
0.43
p
1j.1 ’
29
0.11
l
73
0.15
11
0.11
9
73
0.11
8
0.12
11
73
0.10
I
0.09
11
73
0.53
11
0.11
1?
73
tl.2b
9
0.1
1
74
0.87
12
4.70
2
74
0.33
10
0.39
27
0.20
3
4
0.30
10
0.21
28
0.23
2104 I
3
4
6
7
8
1
2
3
73
, ‘J
73
73
73
7
74
7’
74
8.49
12.uJ
6.03
3.45
0.15
1.87
11.24
4.28
3.88
14
14
14
29
11
12
10
10
d.2 ’
2.38
5.52
G.11
1.42
60.31
4.98
2.70
27
28
?.57
3.00
?10’O1
3
4
‘-
7
9
10
Il
12
1
2
3
73
3
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
5097.03
2228.54
2860.00
709.9d
1571.58
1362.04
1027.90
948.61
1676.36
3403.69
1370.87
125.35
2468.40
14
14
14
29
11
8
13
10
8
12
10
10
152e.1I
2248.36
1928.38
1936.87
1690.52
1076.04
945.78
‘ 28.79
2d4 0.1
12770.90
‘.870.50
1877.41
27
29
5181.48
2361.6
210 4 1
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
7
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
7’.
74
4.45
6.34
2.39
0.63
0.42
0.’.9
0.36
0.38
1.29
1.30
6.20
1.55
1.42
14
14
14
?9
11
8
13
10
8
12
10
10
1.84
u.93
0.57
0.43
0.71
0.43
0.36
0.39
0.61
6.9 ’
0.88
1.08
27
9
1.16
0.78
-------
TPI, uTA Y FLtw 1r .F0r tAr1O F0 Ktj. TUCKY 3/ 5,75
LA ( CODE 2104 r
-------
T IbUTAkY LUw INF0 4MATION FO t ENTUCKY 3/25/75
LAI E LODE 2104 , ENTuC v LAKE
MEAN MONT -ILY FLOkS AND DAILY FLU*S(CMS)
TRjt UTARY ‘ JNTr Yc - MEAN FLOW DAY fLOw DA’r FLO* DAY FLOW
2 104w1 1 73 2.i’.
4 73 4.22 15 l.0
S 73 1.5 . 1’ 1.45
5 13 0.4 10 0.74
7 73 0.28 6 0.24
73 0.33 12 0.43
73 0.24 8 0.29
10 73 0.24 13 0.24
11 73 0.29 10 0.09
12 73 0.29 1 0.67
1 74 4.13 12 4.67
2 74 1.03 2 1.13 lb 0.36
3 74 0.95 2 0.52 16 1.93
2l04 1 3 14 3.37
‘+ 73 4.84 35 1.20
5 73 1.82 10 1.66
6 73 0.48 10 0.84
7 73 0.32 6 0.27
73 0.37 12 0.49
9 73 0.27 8 0.33
10 73 0.27 13 0.27
11 73 0.98 10 0.30
12 13 0.99 1
1 74 4•73 12 5.35
2 74 1.ld 2 1.30 16 0.42
1 74 1.08 2 0.60 16 2.23
2104Y1 3 73 3.31
4 73 4.76 18 13.59
5 73 1.78 10 1.63
6 73 0.47 10 0.83
7 73 0.32 6 0.27
8 73 0.37 12 0.4&
‘1 73 0.27 8 0.32
10 73 0.27 13 u.27
11 7 0.96 10 0.29
12 73 0.97 1 2.23
1 74 4.62 12 5.24
2 14 1.16 2 1.27 16 0.41
3 74 1.06 2 0.’,b 16 2.19
21041Z 3 73 21.21
4 3.00
5 73 13.08
6 73 5.72
7 73 3.37
8 73 3.43
73 2.66
10 73 2.43
11 73 11.38
14 28.60
2 74 8.92
3 74 b. 16
-------
1RIt uTAN’r ‘LOg IN OPMATIUN FQ KENTUCKY 3/ 5/75
LAKE CODE 2104 ENruC Y LArct
MEAN MONTHLY FLO. AND L)AILY FLO (CM i
T 1 UTA- Y Mi (, 4 T-. Y .A? MEAN FLOw D v FLOw LAY FLOW DAY FLtJ W
210471 3 73 0.45
73 0.62
73 0.31
N 73 0.18
7 73 0.10 29 0.07
li 0.10 2 0.09
9 73 0.08 R 0.0
10 13 0.07 11 0.0
11 73 0.35 10 0.0
12 73 0.17
1 74 0.58 12 3.11
2 74 0.22 10 0.13 27 0.22
3 74 0.20 10 0.14 28 0.16
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
DATE TIME
FROM OF
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
u.3
0.3
00625
TOT t JEL
N
MG/L
0 • 501)
0.200
0.200
0.200
O • 200
0.200
1.200
0.900
0.800
0.600
0.600
0.300
0 .200K
0.200K
0 .200’c
0.300
00510
NH 3— ‘4
TOTAL
M&/L
0 • 070
0.070
U. 0R0
0 • OMO
0 • OMO
Ii • OPO
0 • 0 130
1) •
0.030
0 • 090
0 • o’0
0 • 040
0.030
0 • 030
0.040
0 • 070
210401
37 00 00.0 088 15 32.0
KENTUCKY LAKE
21 KENTUCKY
STCI1 T ETP1EvAL jAT 75/03/31
NATL EUTPOP.-ICATION Su. v T1
NE?C—tA E GLS
DATE
F OM
TO
T1M DEPT-’
OF
DAY FEET
11 PALF.S
2111202
3
0068
FEET 0E TI
00400
Pp1
SO MG/L
00077
T RAN S P
SE CC H 1
INCrtES
30
52
37
00074
TU,
T- ANS
b9 • 0
89.0
98 • 0
94 • 0
88 • 0
87.0
88 • 0
86.0
86 • 0
62 • 0
73/05/15 10 40 0000
10 40 000’,
10 40 0015
10 40 0025
10 40 0040
10 40 0054
73/08/13 10 15 0000
1 1 1 OO IS
10 15 0030
10 15 0045
10 15 0065
73/10/20 10 36 0000
10 36 0005
10 36 0015
10 36 0035
10 36 006?
00410
T ALK
CACO3
M6/ L
00 0’ 4
CNUUC FVv
F I ELu
H I C ) HO
140
14 )
140
140
140
140
16
165
163
163
163
140
140
140
140
140
00010
. ATE’
TEMi-
CENT
19.1
19.1
19.0
19.0
19.0
18.9
29.1
29 • 0
28.9
28.8
28.8
21.3
21.2
21 • 1
21.1
20.9
00665 00671
PIiOS—TOT PIIOS—DIS
OPT HO
MG/L P MG/L P
00300 32217
DO CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
5.9
8.8
8.5
8.6
8.6
14.6
17.6 11.0
6.14
6.6
6.6
5.2
4.7
7.6
7.5
7.6
6.8
8.00
7 • 60
7 • 80
7 • 80
7 • 80
7 • 80
7.50
7 • 80
7 • 60
7 • 50
7 • so
7 • 60
7 • 50
7.50
7 • 40
7 • 30
50 0.084
50 0.080
54 0.079
54 0.087
0.075
54 0.091
56 0.072
57 0.066
57 0.063
57 0.071
57 0.084
61 0.075
61 0.069
62 0.072
55 0.070
59 0.113
0.0 33
0.031
0.032
0.039
0.031
0.032
0.041
0.030
0.028
0.026
0.026
0.041
0.038
0.035
0.038
0.035
00630
DEPTh N02 N03
N—TOTAL
TO OAY FEET MG/L
73/05/15 10 40 0000
10 40 O0O ’
If) 40 001
10 40 0025
10 40 0040
10 40 0054
73/08/13 10 15 0000
10 15 OO lr. ,
10 15 0030
10 15 0045
10 15 0065
73/10/20 10 36 0000
10 36 0005
10 36 0015
10 36 0035
10 36 0052
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO ET RETPIEvAL L)A1E•1, ),03,
NATL EUTPOPriIC. T10 SU vEy
NE C—I.AS vEGAS
I 1EPALES 2111202
0036 FEET DEPTH
DATE
F4OM
T I)
T1 E OE T-
OF
0A FEET
210402
36 53 07.0 088 09 45.0
KENTUCKY LAKE -
21 KENTUCKY
3
73/05/15 13 20 0000
13 20 0006
13 20 001C
13 20 0024
13 20 003?
73,08,13 13 25 0000
13 25 Oclo
13 25 0020
13 25 O0d
TU 6
T ANSP
CNUUCTVV
*ATLr I
PH
00
T- NS
SECC II
FILLI)
TEM I .
CIILNPHYL
I ALK
PHO5—TQT
PHOS—DIS
*
INC’-IES
MIL 40MHO
Ct N1
SU
MG.’L
A
LJG/L
CACO
MG/L
MG/L P
ORTHO
MG/L P
145
140
140
140
140
162
16
164
164
20.1
19.3
19.2
19.2
19.2
29.3
29.3
2 .3
7.80
7.60
7.60
7.80
7.bu
7.90
7.80
8.6
6.5
6.3
10.6
10.2
15.6
54
54
55
55
50
58
57
0.099
0.082
0.079
0.077
0.089
0.070
0.070
0.038
0.031
0.034
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.026
DATE
FROM
To
TIME 1)EPt i
OF
DAY FEET
36
44
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0 • 200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.900
0.700
0.700
66 • 0
86.0
82.0
68 • 0
00630
NO? NO3
N—TOTAL
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
n . j .
0.1
73/05,15 13 20 0000
13 20 0006
13 20 0015
13 20 0024
13 20 0032
73/08/13 13 25 0000
13 25 0010
13 25 002 ’
00610
Nr13—N
TU IAL
MG.’L
0.060
0 • 060
o • 070
0.080
0 • 070
0.080
0 • 070
0.080
-------
STOPET RtTPIEVAL UATE 75/03/31
NAIL EUTPOP -,1CATIO\ SUPVEY
NE C-LAS VEcAS
73/05/15 13 50 0000
13 50 0006
13 50 0015
13 50 0025
13 50 00’ 0
13 50 0060
73/08/13 14 00 0000
14 00 0005
14 00 0010
14 00 0020
14 00 0030
14 00 0040
14 00 0050
73/10/20 09 49 0000
09 49 0005
09 49 0015
09 49 0030
09 49 0054
140
140
145
140
140
140
167
169
159
169
168
168
169
145
145
145
145
145
19.7
19.6
19.5
19.3
19.2
19.2
9.5
9. 1
29.1
29.0
29.0
28.9
28.8
1 .5
21.4
21.4
21.4
21.3
210403
38 45 40.0 088 06 58.0
KENTUCKY LAKE
21 KENTUCKY
11EI-ALES 2111202
0054 FEET
8.7
8.5
8.5
8.4
6.6
5.2
7.8
7.8
7.6
7.0
6.9
DATE
FR 0
TO
TIRE 0EPT -
OF
OAr FEET
(JO i 94
CNDUCI V ‘r
FIELD
MI C UMhO
00010
TEMP
CENT
00300 32217
DO CrILRPHYL
A
14G/L uG/L
00074
ru;•n
TM A ‘iS
85 • 0
d9 • 0
88 • 0
94 • 0
9, • 0
79 • 0
69 • 0
83.0
82,0
82.0
83.0
12 • 0
00410
T ALK
CA C (I 3
(4G/L
uE -TH
00665 00s71
PMOS.-TOT PpIOS—DIS
O k T P40
PIG/L P MG/L P
3
00400
Ph
SU
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.70
7.60
7.50
7.60
7.60
7.50
7.40
7.30
00077
TNAN r
SE CC I
INCHES
28
44
35
00625
TOT KJEL
N
M13/L
6.8
9.3
57 0.075
50 0.083
55 0.084
55 0.103
54 0.087
52 0.104
58 0.070
59 0.058
0.038
0.027
0.026
0.0 26
0.0 25
0.026
0.023
0.0 23
DATE
FPOM
TO
00530
TIME DEPTH N026N03
OF N—TOTAL
DAY FEET
58 0.065 0.022
00610
NH 3—N
TO I AL
MG/L
50 0.104
62 0.095
61 0.086
51 0.085
62 0.078
63 0.102
0.027
0.043
0.038
0.0 39
0.041
0.041
73/05/15
13
50
0000
0.5
0.200
0.070
13
50
0005
0.5
0,100
0.080
13
50
0015
0.5
0.200K
0.070
13
50
0025
0.5
0.200
0.070
13
50
0040
0.5
O.200rc
0.070
13
SO
0060
0.5
0.200
0.060
73/08/13
14
14
14
14
00
00
00
00
0000
0005
0030
0050
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.400
0.080
0.090
0.100
0.150
73/10/20
09
09
09
09
09
49
49
49
49
49
0000
0005
0015
0030
0054
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1.000
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.050
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO FT PETp ILVAL ATcj7 ,/03/3
NATL EUTROPF1ICATION 3u’ ’E’
NEPC—LAS VEt,AS
21040’.
3’ 38 17.0 088 03 20.0
KE TUCr Y LAKE
21 ‘ ENT1JCKy
11 IY ALES 2111202
0063 FEET
73/05/15 14 30 0000
14 30 0006
14 30 0015
14 30 0025
14 30 0040
14 30 0059
73/08/13 1’ 45 000
14 45 001(1
14 45 0020
8.6
8.2
8.3
8.3
6.3
T.6
6.4
6.4
DATE
F—ON
TO
TIME DE T’
OF
DAY FEET
3
DEPT i-
0007’
00077
00094
00010
00400
00300
32217
00410
00665
00b71
TU C
TI ANS
CNUUCTVY
ATE . ’
DO
C8LHPHYL
7 ALK
PF1OS—T0T
PHOSDIS
rc Ns
SECC8L
FILLL?
TIM,’
A
CACO3
ORTrIO
INChES
MIC OMI-4O
CENT
Su
UG/L
14G/L
HG/L P
MG/L P
142
140
140
140
140
140
19.5
1 .5
19.3
19.3
19.3
19.3
7.80
7.90
8.00
7.90
7.80
7.90
5.4
48
56
57
57
57
56
0.092
0.080
0.096
0.090
0.089
0.093
0.028
0.031
0.029
0.031
0,030
0.030
8ó.0
171
29.’.
7.40
7.6
58
0.063
0.030
87.0
172
29.1
7.40
58
0.058
0.023
86.0
173
29.0
7.50
55
0.064
0.023
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPI-’
OF
DAy FEET
00630
00625
00610
NU2AMO3
TOT KJEL
N83—N
r.l—rOrAL
N
TOTAL
ML /L
MG/L
M(,/L
73/O /15 14 30 0000
1’ 30 0006
14 30 0015
14 30 0025
14 30 0040
14 30 0059
73/08/13 14 45 0000
14 45 001 (1
1 . 45 0020
0. ,
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0 • 200
0 • 200K
0 • 200K
0 • 200K
0.200K
0 • 200K
0.500
o • 300
0.300
0. 08u
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.070
0 • 070
o • o o
0.090
0 • 090
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STUi ET qET ’IE’.AL DATE 7 ,/03/31
NATL EUT +OPp,ICAT1Ur’. SU. vEV
NERC—LAS dEGAS
210 4 0s
36 29 33.0 088 03 15.0
KENTUCIcY LAKE
21 rcENruct y
1 1E- ALES
3
2111202
0056 FEET L)E ’T i
73/OS/is 17 00 oooo
17 00 0006
17 00 001’)
17 00 0025
17 00 0040
17 00 0059
73/08/13 15 45 0000
15 45 0010
15 45 002fl
15 45 0030
15 45 0040
IS 45 0053
73/10/20 12 42 0000
12 42 0005
12 42 0015
12 42 0030
12 ? 005?
DATE TIPiE
FROM OF
0.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
00625
TOT PcJLL
N
MG/L
0 • 500
0.100
0.200
0.20 Oic
0 • 20 0i
0.200
0 • 600
o • 300
o • 300
0.300
o • 300
0.300
0 • 200
0 • 300
0.200
O• 200
1
1’5
1 4
145
140
125
172
i7
172
171
168
169
147
14b
145
145
1 ‘+5
00610
Nh3-
TUTAL
0 • 0 SO
0 • 060
0 • i70
0.070
0 • 080
0.080
0.070
0 • u lu
0 • 100
0 • 070
o • 060
0 • 0 i0
0 • 040
0 • 050
0 • 040
0 • U ’ +0
19.8
19.8
19.5
19.4
19.3
19.0
29 • 6
29.5
29 • 3
29.1
29 • 0
28 • 9
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
8.9
8.2
8.2
3.2
8.5
7.6
7.4
6.4
7.4
12.0
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.6
DATE
TO
11”t. DE T-
OF
DAY FELT
000 ,4
CN iuL I vv
F I Li
M I C- OMi-IU
00010
* A1Ek
CENT
00077
TRANS-
SE CC i- s I
INCHES
33
3d
00074
IUF6
85.0
86 • 0
87.0
96.0
98 • 0
6. 0
82.0
81.0
79 • 0
60.0
7 .0
00300 32217
DO CPIL ’ +PHYL
A
MG/L UG/L
4.5
00410
T ALK
CA C ii 3
MG/L
00665 00671
PNOS—TOT PMOS—DIS
ORTuiO
MG/L P MG/L P
00400
SO
6.70
7.60
7.80
7.70
7.70
7.90
7.80
7.70
7.60
7.70
7.70
7.40
7.40
7.30
7.30
7.30
13.5
5.1
54 0.068
49 0.081
0.077
54 0.075
47 0.088
40 0.094
54 0.070
53 0.063
0.061
51 0.070
52 0.068
80 0.086
52 0.080
51 0.078
51 0.086
49 0.095
0.026
0.027
0,029
0.031
0.027
0.024
0.026
0 • 026
0.027
0.021
0.023
0.044
0.045
0.040
0.039
0.038
00630
flEPTi N024N03
N—TOTAL
TO CAY FEET MG/L
73/0 ,/iS 17 00 0000
17 00 0006
17 00 00I ’
17 O’ 002 ’
17 00 0040
17 00 OO
73’08/13 15 45 ooon
15 4 noic 1
1 ’ 45 01)20
15 45 0040
15 45 0053
73/10/20 12 42 0000
12 42 0005
12 42 0015
1? 42 0030
12 4? 0052
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
ST0- ET PET 1t AL UATt..I ,/U3/J2
NAIL EUTPOP ’-iICATIO” SUi vEY
NEPC-LAS JEGAS
210406
36 23 2 3.0 088 00 ,3.0
‘ ENTuC’ Y LAi E
21 ENTUCKy
73/05,16 10 10 0000
10 10 000 -
10 10 0015
10 10 002
10 10 0040
1” 10 0057
73/08/14 10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0031)
10 00 00.s6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.300
0.200K
0 .200
0.400
0.300
0 • 300
0.600
0.400
0.500
0.400
0 • 070
0 • 060
0 • 070
0.070
0 • 060
0.070
0.110
0.100
o •
0 • 090
00010
MATE—
TEM,.
CENt
2111202
0061 FEET 0 PTH
00300 32217 00410
00 CPIL PMYL T ALPc
A CAC 3
uG/L MG/L
8.0
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
5.7
00665 00671
PHOS—TOT PHOS—DJS
OR T iO
MG/L P MG/L P
DATE
FPOu
To
TIME 0E T—
OF
f) Y FEET
1 1L Lc.S
3
O 0 0 74
TUr B
T ’ ANS
90 • 0
88 • 0
• 0
55 • 0
00077
TPANSF
SECC-41
INCr’FJS
30
42
00094
CNL)UC IVY
I C 0 ri()
155
145
145
145
145
145
170
1 7’.
173
173
00400
PH
7 • 50
7 • 60
7 • 60
7.70
7.70
7.70
7.20
7.30
7 • 30
7 • 30
19.6
19.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
19.5
2 . 1
29 • 1
49 • 1
29.1
DATE
TIME
DEPT
NO2 ,Mu3
TOT
PcJEL
Nr13—N
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOIAL
Ti)
DAy
FELT•
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
5.3
58 0.085
56 0.073
56 0.071
56 0.079
54 0.080
54 0.082
55 0.083
54 0.067
Sb 0.071
56 0.073
6.4
0.029
0.028
0.029
0.028
0.031
0.029
0 • 034
0.032
0.036
0.032
73/O /16 10 10 0001)
10 10 0006
10 10 001
10 10 002s
10 10 004 )
10 10 0057
73/08/14 10 00 0000
10 00 0O0
10 00 0030
10 00 0046
__K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
ST0 ET E1 IE / L ,ATE 1 /03/3l
NAIL EUT, Ol.)-11CATIC,’ SU- vE.
NE C—LAS VEOLS
210407
36 16 22.0 088 08 35.0
KENTUCS Y LA’ E
21 ENIUCi\Y
I 1 PALES
3
211 1 02
0018 FEET L)E TP1
73/05/16 13 15 0000
13 15 0006
13 15 0014
73/013/14 13 0 0000
13 20 0004
1 20 OOO
73/11)120 3 12 0001
13 12 0002
13 12 0005
• 0
62 • 0
26 • 0
1 )7 • 0
67 • 0
67 • 0
2.4
4.2
6.6
6.6
5.2
9.6
9.4
DATE
F2OY
To
Tj .’E DE 1’-
01
DAY FElT
0 (1 1 ) 4
Tu . h
Ti AI’4 )
00077
T l AN5r’
SE CC I I I
INCMES
CNL)UC1 VY
F It.L(J
‘4! (.r 0Md0
00010
ATE I
CENT
00400 00300 32217
C ’-fL! PI 4YL
A
51 1 Mu/L (J(,/L
00410
T ALK
CACOJ
MG/L
36
73
17.7
7.50
70
17.7
7.50
70
17.2
7.40
80
27.5
7.10
80
27.2
7.10
7’
26.3
7.00
30
SI
SI
57
11.3
11.3
17.3
8.60
8.10
7.80
00665 00671
P1 -sOS—TOT PsiOS—DIS
OPT rIO
M6/L P MG/L P
27.8
25 • 0
38 • 7
22 0.068
21 0.071
23 0.079
0.072
20 0.080
20 0.112
15 0.079
15 0.091
15 0.095
0.009
0 • 008
0.010
0.009
0.010
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.010
•
00630
00625
00610
DATE
TIME
OEPT’-
F.4O2 N03
TOT KJt L
NM3—t’i
F s .jM
OF
N—TOTAL
TurAL
TO
r,AY
FEET
M( /L
M0/L
Mu/L
73/IJ /16
1315 000s’
13 15 0006
13 15 0014
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.800
0.500
0.400
0.130
0.120
0.130
73/08/14
13 20 0000
13 20 0004
13 20 O0O ’
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.000
0.900
0.800
0.110
0.120
0.180
73/10/20
13 12 0000
13 12 0002
13 12 0005
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.900
O.i O0
1.000
0.040
0.040
o.0 +o
-------
STO- tT LT’. 1EV4L u. TE 7 iu3ifl
f’IATL EuT o Ic4r1o S• J• vE
NE C—LA5 VE( AS
‘ 10408
36 16 17.0 088 05 30.0
KENTUCI
-------
ST’) ET PET ’1E L DAIF 7,103/31
t JATL EUTkCP ,ICATI0 J Su vEY
NIwC—LLS vE,,AS
21 040’
36 16 17.0 087 56 42.0
VcENTUCvSY LAKE
21 KENTUCKY
1 1EP4Lr
3
2111202
0067 FEET OEPTH
73/05/16 16 00 0000
16 00 000’.
16 00 0015
16 00 002
16 00 0045
16 00 0063
73/10/20 13 so 0000
13 50 000S
13 50 0015
13 50 0O3
1) 50 0056
00630
N02&N 03
N—TOTAL
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
00825
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
O • 500
0 • 200K
O • 20 O K
0.200K
O • 200K
o • 200
0 • 300
0.300
Ii. 300
0.200
0 • 200
00610
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.Od O
0.070
0.060
0.080
0.080
0 • 070
0.0 70
0.070
0.070
0.080
8.4
8.6
8.2
8.2
7.4
7.4
7.8
7.4
DATE
F Ow
TO
TIr E OEf T’
OF
flAY FEET
00074
00077
00O 4
00010
00400
0030u
32217
00410
00665
00671
Tu 8
TRANSP
ChiOUCIVY
•ATt,-
P 1
D
ChLi Pr1YL
T ALK
PHOS—TOT
PPIOS—DIS
TRANS
SECC -II
FIE.Lt)
TLMp-
A
CACO3
ORTHO
-
1NCr’ES
‘1 oM ’ .0
CLNT
So
HG/L
uG/L
P4G/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
33
155
145
155
1 50
155
150
0.0
20.0
19.9
19.9
19.9
19.8
7.70
7.70
7.70
7.70
7.70
7.70
9.1
80
60
81
58
59
58
0.083
0.081
0.092
0.076
0.071
0.071
0.032
0.026
0.031
0.025
0.026
0.024
82.0
36
152
22.2
7.60
3.1
51
0.088
0.041
81.0
152
21.8
7.50
51
0.085
0.044
42.0
14
21.8
7.50
52
0.091
0.042
84.0
151
21.5
7.50
54
0.083
0.046
83.0
1 50
21.4
7.40
53
0.082
0.040
DATE TIME OEPTr
FkOM OF
TO DAY FEET M6/L
73/05/16 16 00 0000
16 00 0006
16 00 0015
16 00 0025
16 00 0045
16 00 0063
73/10/20 13 50 0000
13 50 0005
13 50 0015
13 50 0035
13 50 00 f .
_K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO T ET IEvAL DATE. r’ /u3/31
tiATL EUTF OPhICA11O’s Su- vEY
t\i wC—LA5 E3AS
210410
38 06 14.0 0 7 6
cEt .TUCI Y LAi E
21 ENJUC,c!
1 IEPALES
3
211 1 02
0049 EtT
DATE
FPOM
TO
T1”E DEr’T
QF
DAY FEET
73/05/16 17 CO 0000
17 0 00u ’
17 00 0015
17 0’) 0025
17 00 0045
73/08/14 IS 45 0000
5 ‘ .5 0005
15 45 0010
15 45 0025
15 45 0035
15 45 0043
33
40
00074
00077
0)0 ’”.
00010
00i00
00300
32217
00410
T ’. b
T AN F
CNL)o(IIY
ATL
Pu-t
00
ChL PHYL
T ALK
00665
00671
TRANS
SECCHL
FIC.L()
TEMP
A
CAC O3
PHOS—DIS
t
I ” .CpIE$
lI uMr O
CENT
SO
M(j/L
U0/L
MG/I..
MG/L P
OKIHO
MG/L P
160
160
150
155
165
20.2
20.2
20.2
20.0
19.9
7.50
7.70
7.80
7.70
7.70
8.6
8.4
b.
8.
10.1
61
60
62
62
81
0.071
0.07?
0.066
0.076
0.033
0.030
0.031
0.032
85.0
175
29.6
7.20
4.4
57
0.079
0.029
85.0
170
29.6
7.20
6. ’i
0.071
0.038
85.0
177
2 .5
7.30
6.4
58
58
0.062
0.036
90.0
171
0.060
0.035
89.0
178
29.2
q2.o
176
29.2
7.20
DATE
f 0M
To
TIME DE”T
OF
DAY FEET
N02 .N03
TOT
KJEL
‘ Ji- .3—N
N—rorAL
N
TO1AL
Mu/L
MG/L
MG/L
73/05/16 17 00 0000 0.5 0. ..00
17 00 0006 0.5 0.200
17 00 0015 0.5 0.200
17 00 0025 0.5 0.200 1c
17 00 0045 0.5 0.20 0K
73/08/14 15450000 0.3 0.700
15 45 0005 0.3 0.400
15 45 OO1 0.3 0.400
15 45 004., 0.3 0.500
_K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
0.080
0 • 050
0 • 060
0 • 070
0 • 070
0 • 080
O • 080
o • 080
0 • 150
INDICATED
-------
STOPET ETkIEvAL UAIt 15/0. ’/11
NAIL FUTPO r 1CAT1O’j SO vEY
NE ’ C—LAS VE(A5
210611
36 00 22.0 087 59 56.0
ISENIUCrc’r LANE
ENTuC Y
11L ALts 2111202
0053 FEET OE T
0AT
FP0 ’
TO
TI’E OE-’T—
OF
DAY FEET
3
73/05/17 10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 00i
10 00 0030
10 00 o0’.9
00010
TEM,- ’
CEN1
00400
SL)
0007’.
Tu b
T p’ s
0063’)
N 02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
00300 32217 00’10
DO CHLPPHYL I ALr
A CACD3
UG/L M6/L
DATE
F 0M
TO
0007 /
SECC—I
36
00625
TOT IcJEL
MG/L
0.700
0.600
0.’.00
0.400
0.300
IIt. ’E DEPT—
OF
I)AY FEET
U 0 094
C ’ iOuL1 Vy
F I LD
“ I C- U 1HO
161
15
15b
158
I 52
00e 10
7 ,.) I AL
0.090
0.060
0.060
O • UbO
0 • 060
00665 00671
r ’hOS—TOT PPIOS—DIS
OPTr1O
M(,/L P MG/L P
19.9
7.7
5.7
0.110
0.028
19.9
7.70
8.2
6
0.057
0.027
19.9
7.70
8.2
56
0.083
0.033
19.9
7.7o
8.
56
0.114
0.027
19.8
7.70
8.2
56
0.260
0.028
73/05/17 10 00 0000
10 00 00o
10 00 0015
10 Oh 0030
10 00 00’+ ’
-------
210412
35 45 55.0 087 59 15.0
)cENTUC,cy LAPSE
21 NIUCr ’ v
1111-ALES 2111202
0051 FEET
STO ’ ET ET 1tVAL
NAIL EUT- OP-iIC’ .TIU\ SU- VFY
NEPC—LAS VEGAS
DATE
F OM
TO
TI E OE T’—
OF
OAy FtE.I
3
73/05/17 12 10 000’)
12 10 O00
12 10 0015
12 10 0030
12 10 0047
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME JEPI.-
OF
DAY FEET
00074
00077
CfJO’,4
00010
00400
00300
32217
00410
00665
00671
ru—c
T- N- 1 -
c L)uclvv
-ArE.
PH
00
CrILNPrIYL
T AL ’c
PHOS—TOT
T AN5
SLCCHI
FI L)
TEM. ’
A
CACO3
INCrIES
MIC ’JM u
CENT
SD
MG/L
JG/L
M ,/L
M(,/L P
MC,/L P
4d
12’
159
158
15 ’s
157
20.4
20.3
20.2
20.1
20.1
7.71)
7.70
7.70
7.70
7.70
8.2
8.0
7.8
8.0
4.4
53
54
53
51
48
0.059
0.056
0.054
0.053
0.056
0.030
0.033
0.029
0.035
0.029
00630
NOt N03
N— IOTAL
M6/L
73/05/17 12 10 0000
12 10 000h
12 10 0015
12 10 0030
12 10 0041
00f 2
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0 • 300
0.300
0.300
0 • 300
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0061 0
N , —‘
TOTAL
MD/L
0. (IbO
0. 0 ’O
0.060
0.060
0.900
-------
21 0’. li
35 37 52.0 088 01 57.0
t(Er4luClcY LaicE
21 rchNTuCtcr
I IE’ALES 2 111 2 0c
0049 FEET
Tu b
T AN5
00077
T. AN P
SECCrt I
INC ES
3
U 0)94
CNUUC Ivy
F I i
4 I C- . i-iO
00010
ATEP
TEMfr
CEA T
00400
NtITL
EUTP0P iICATI0
5u dEY
Nf C—LA5
VE’3AS
DATE
TIME
DEI.IT_
F90
0F
10
O4
FEE.T
73/05/17
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 35
0000
0006
0015
0030
0045
36
73/10/22
10 32
i I 32
10 32
0000
0015
003
93.0
93.0
90.0
g
OATE
TIMI
DEPIp-
00630
NOd N0J
00625
TOT IcJLL
OOb lO
Nii3—i’
FPOM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
TO
flAY
FEET
.,/L
MG/L
MC,/L
73/05/17
12 35
1? 35
1? 3
12 35
12 35
0000
0006
0015
0030
0045
0.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.070
73/10/22
10 32
30 32
10 32
0000
001 ,
0O3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.600
0.200
0.200
0.050
0.060
0.050
SO
DEPTh
00300 32217
DO CP-IL9P 1YL
A
MG/L UG/L
150
14 3
1 Sd
15
159
159
159
159
00410
T ALK
CA C’) 3
MG/L
20 • 1
20 • 1
20 • 0
• 0
20.0
22.
?2.0
22 • 0
3.5
00665 00o71
PIIOS—TOT PHOS—DIS
ORT iO
MG/L. P MG/L P
7 • 70
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.70
7.60
7 .oo
1.60
8.9
7.b
1.4
7.4
7.4
51 0.046
53 0.050
53 0.052
0.050
51 0.050
0.073
63 0.060
65 0.065
0.025
0.030
0 • 02Q
0.030
0.029
0.049
0.047
0.047
-------
STO .T ‘ . EI It.V4L L T • 7 .’ )3 /- 1
NAIL EuT OPiICATIU’i ,I v y
NEkC-LAS VEGAS
210414
35 23 36.1) 087 58 55.0
KENTUC (Y LA’cI.
21 P ENTUCIcv
OATE
FPO
TO
Tj E O . 1 -
OF
DAY FEEJ
73/05/17 12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 45 0O1
1? 45 0025
12 45 00.37
000 10
i.A TE
CENT
11E ALES 2111202
0041 FEET DEPTH
O0400
So MG/L
0OC 74
Tu 3
I - 4NS
00630
NO2 .NO3
N—TOTAL
MG/L
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
DATE
FPOM
TO
00077
rk AN S F-
SECCiaI
INCHES
36
00625
TOT lc.JEL
N
MG,’L
0.800
0.400
0.400
0 • 300
0.300
TIME OEPt -’
OF
DAY FEET
CNL)LJ(. T dY
F I LD
iIC 0frk0
156
1 5(
icg
160
00610
NH 3 —
TOTuL
MG/L
0 • 100
0 • 070
0.090
0.090
0 • 090
2 .1
7.70
20.1
7.70
20.1
7.60
8.1
20.1
7.80
8.0
7.8
00665
00671
CHLMPHYL
T ALIc
PHO5—TOT
PMOS—DIS
A
iJG/L
CACO3
MG/L
MG/L P
Of T’-iO
P4G/L P
1.7
Sb
56
56
56
0.057
0.093
0.053
0.053
0.034
0.034
0.035
0.034
73/05/17 12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 45 0015
12 45 0025
12 45 003?
-------
STO ’ET . ETPI TVAL DATE 7,/03131
NATL FjjTPOP’-tIC4TI0 Su. vEY
NEPC—LAS VE S
21041’,
35 2 47.0 088 11
P ENr1JCP’ Y LAicE
I c EN TUC ic
I1LPALES
3
211 1202
0037 FEET OE.’TM
73/05/17 13 35 0000
13 35 0008
13 35 001D
13 35 0033
73/10/22 09 54 0000
09 54 0005
09 54 0015
09 54 0025
7.9
8.1
8.2
8.0
7.4
7.6
DATE
TO
TI ’E )Er-’T—
OF
DAY FEET
45.0
OOJo0
00
00010
ATE
TEMP
CENT
19.9
20 • 0
19.9
22.0
22 0
• 0
22.0
00400
Pi,
SD
7 • 80
7.80
7 • 70
7.70
7 • 60
7 •
7 • 80
7 • SO
00 ‘ (4
TUk
T A N S
95 • 0
95 • 0
95 • 0
95 • 0
00630
NO2e N03
N—TOTAL
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
DATE
FPOM
To
32217 0041&
CI ’L PrlVL T ALP
A
IJG.’L MG/L
1.6
2.3
00665 00671
PHOS—TOT Pi•4OS—DIS
OPT HO
MG/L P HG/L P
00077
TRANSP
SECC’- I
I NCrIES
36
73
00625
TOT IcJEL
N
M1,/L
0.600
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00094
CNUUCT VY
F I LD
Mj C 0Mrl0
1 Sb
l5
159
159
180
160
160
160
00610
Nh3-N
TOTAL
M&/L
0 • GAO
0.070
0.OA O
0.080
0.060
0 • 050
0 • 050
0 • 040
52 0.053
51 0.051
51 0.053
53 0.054
Sb 0.056
57 0.055
57 0.055
60 0.058
73/05/17 13 35 0000
13 35 0006
13 35 0015
13 35 0033
73/10/22 09 54 0000
09 54 0005
09 54 0015
09 54 0025
0.032
0.034
0.034
0.028
0.045
0.042
0.042
0.042
-------
STOkEr ,.SLT,flLVAL uAFE’ t / 3fi
NAIL _UTkO -.ICATIUN Ur EY
NE4C—LAS VEGAS
alo..i
35 14 28.0 0 8 15 25.0
KEN1UCI ’r LA,cE
21 cE’ JTuC cv
11r L .S 2l1120
0037 FEET
DATE
FPOV
TO
TI-E 1)E?T—
OF
DAY FEET
73/uS/17 15 40 0000
15 40 0006
15 40 OO IS
15 40 0033
3
00010
p. A TE -
Ct. ‘ T
0 040 U
PH
So
U ‘-‘
luNd
I i c AN S
00630
Nod
N—TOTAL
MG/L
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
00300 32217 00410
Do CrlL PMYL I AL’
A CACO3
MG/L JG/L MG/L
DATE
FPOM
TO
00077
T . 1. . S P
SECCr1 I
INC rit.S
36
00625
TOT PcJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
TIME )EPTi
OF
DAY FEET
(j00 9
CNU0C1 VI
F It.LL,
I Lr UMH,J
159
160
168
00610
Nh3-N
TUIAL
MO/L
0.100
o • 080
O • 070
O • 090
006b5 00671
.iOS—T0T PHOS-DIS
0 TrlO
MG/L P MG/L P
20.1
7.70
1.4 56
0.056
0.033
20.1
7.70
8.2
57
0.058
0.040
20.1
7.70
8.2
Sb
0.054
0.032
20.1
7.70
8.2
7
0.055
0.035
73/05/17 15 40 0000
15 40 0006
15 40 0015
IS 40 0033
-------
STO ET P TI-T V L TE 75,o3,jj
NATL EUT OP 1CAT1O S ’jr EY
N1j’C-LAS vFr.tis
210417
35 56 27.0 087 58 07.0
PcENTIJL’SY LAKE
21 PcENrucc’r
1 1t$ ALES
3
21 1120
0045 FEET OEPTpi
73/05/17 16 15 0000
16 1 0006
16 15 0015
16 1’ 003(
16 15 0041
73/08/15 10 00 0000
10 00 001”
10 00 0031
73/10/22 12 47 0000
12 47 0005
12 47 ooi
12 47 00dI
8.2
7.9
7.9
8.0
6.0
6.2
5.8
7.8
7.4
7.4
DATE
FP OM
TO
TI E oE’ r—
(‘F
•)AY FEEl
000 77
T . A5’,P
SE CC -i I
NC ES
36
66
48
0007’
Tu. 1
T NS
85 • 0
94 • U
93.0
2.0
• 0
00300
DO
O Oij’, ’.
C ‘ a t uC I v y
F I LL.)
M C C I M 8 U
ISO
150
P’O
148
150
171
172
172
154
154
154
154
00 0 1 0
. ATE
I EM
CENT
0 .4
20.’ .
20.1
20.0
20.1
2 • 4
22.0
21.9
21.9
00400
p s - I
Su
7.10
7 • 50
7.70
7.60
7.70
7.70
7 • bO
7.50
7 • 60
7.80
7.60
7.60
00665 00671
P#OS—TOT PI -WS—DIS
OPT-sO
Mb/L P ‘4G/L P
32217 0041C
CrIL Pr 5YL T ALK
4 CACO3
uG/L MG/L
5.1
7.0
5.4
54 0.061
54 0.064
54 0.055
54 0.055
54 0.057
52 0,046
0.04A
0.044
64 0.063
63 0.060
62 0.057
60 0.059
00630
00625
(jOblO
OATE
T1 IE
DEPEM
N02 NO3
TOT K .iEL
N ( -N
F O l
OF
N—TU1AL
;
TOTAL
TO
DAY
FEET
hit /L
P4G/L
MG/L
0.029
0.026
0.028
0.027
0.029
0.036
0.034
0 • 037
0.049
0 • 046
0.045
0.044
73/05/17
16
P
0005)
0.5
0.300
O.u6u
16
15
0006
0.D
0.200
0.060
16
15
O01
0.5
0.200
0.070
16
15
0030
0.
0.200
u.u70
lb
15
0041
0.5
0.200
0.060
73/08/15
10
10
10
00
00
00
00U0
ooic
0031
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.500
0.300
0.200
o.o- o
0.090
0.090
73/10/22
12
17
l
12
47
47
7
47
000 11
0005
0015
‘O2 ’
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.500
0.200
4i. 00’c
O.200
0.u70
0.o4u
(‘.040
u.o u
_K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
104A1 LS21O4A1
36 5 30.0 088 13 00.0
b4Nr LEY CAr AL
21 7.5 IRM1N(,HAN
T/rcEN1uC Y LAKI.
b u(, UN ,i NT
I 1€.’-ALtS
4
STo- T ! T’ 1E.VAL OA1 75/i’3/31
‘ 6 MI S . Gr ANU NI e.N
211 1 04
0000 FEET DEPTH
0066”
0Ob 1
( 0 iO
006
00610
UATE
T1.E
n,EI. T_
— jS—T(jT
-riu —UI
NO - - .u3
TOT ‘J L
3—N
Fc o
o
U- TriO
N—IOTAL
N
rOTAL
TO
04i
F .t1
“OIL
MG/L P
rlO/L
MO/L
M( /L
73,03,31
10
0. OQ O
0.046
0.6
0.’e 0
0.03w
73/OS/Oh
10 50
0.100
0.04b
0.5
0.500
0.0 ’6
73/07/09
11 04
0.070
0.019
0.2
0.500
73/07/25
11 0 1
0.090
0.046
0.1
?.410
0.067
73/08,14
11 30
u.065
0.024
0.1
2.700
0.100
73/09,27
11 40
0.055
0.014
u.0
0.660
73,11,11
10
30
u.Olo
0.036
0.3
0. 15
0.040
74/01,13
0 IS
0.150
0.060
0.6
1.600
74/02/01
1130
0.115
0.040
0.6
0.100
0.015
74/03/16
11 03
u.085
0.035
i .6
1.000
0.060
500•, I
FLO.i
INST MGI)
50053
CONDO IT
FLOW—MC,D
MON FriLl
-------
STO ET T ItVaL UC TE 7 , ,o3,jc
2104 1 L 5210451
37 01 30.0 088 17 00.0
TENNLSSEE. kivEk
7.5 CALVLkT CITy
O/r Er TuC,cY LAlcL
3- 3(, (r NTUCr 1) ..’) ON HWY
1Jt kALES 2111204
0000 FEET u krM
00671 u06J0 00t.25 00610 50051 50053
UATE TJ ‘E •)E 1- ‘ “OS—T0T . hO5—Dj . ‘iO. u Tor rc.JEL .-43—N FLOW CONDUIT
FPO C (i 1k,J TO1AL FLO —MG [ )
TO (IA ’. FE .T Mt,/L i MG/L M(3/L MG/L M1,/L INST MGI) MONTHLY
73/03,31 09 45 0.110 0.042 0.’. 0.500 O.1b
73/05/06 10 00 0.105 0.049 u. 0.630
73/r,7 /o j 10 10 0.040 0.009 0.1 0.340 0.04H
73/07,25 10 35 u.1e0 0.0 .0 0.2 0.610
73/08/14 11 00 0.060 0.02’ 0.1 0.960 0.044
731)9/27 11 15 0.065 0.014 0.01 0.320 0.0
73/11/11 o 40 (‘.050 0.040 0.4 2.000 0.144
74/01/130945 0.0 ’ 5 0.050 0.5 2.000 0.73
74/02/03 1040 0.105 0.045 0.b 0.500 0.0’.0
74/03/15 10 17 u.085 0.035 0.6 0. 00 0.035
-------
ET P LT dI VAL i)A1 7 /03/3l
2104C1 LS21O4C I
36 4b 00.0 08 14 00.0
JUr ATMAN CkEtl
7.5 FA1,- ,D€A ING
T/,SENTUC’c’y LAPSE
-I bO d’4(J(, E Or r$ARDIN APPkOX M l
l1’ LES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DLI.’Th
Out,40 00t? 00610 50051 50053
,ATF T1 ’E OEPT ‘1O5TOT kOSD1S NO NiJ3 TOT i’ jEL 3N FLOq LO DU1T
‘o ” OF O T iO N—IOTAL N WAIb FLOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L MG/L HG/L INST M ,U MONTrILY
‘ /03/31 12 ic 0.055 0.010 0.2 0. 80 0.046
‘4/05/06 13 45 0.070 0.014 0.1 0.650 0.072
‘p’0710q 11 S 0.065 0.005 K 0.02 0.655 0.017
‘4/07,25 12 05 (‘.240 0.132 0.3 2.310 0.240
‘ /08/14 12 30 0.410 0.132 0.5 6.100 0.920
‘ /09/27 1300 0.085 0.010 0.01K 1.470 0.220
‘ /L1/11 1115 u.050 0.012 0.01 1.800 0.044
‘“/01/13 1140 0.020 0.012 u.T 0.300 0.050
‘“/02/03 12 40 0.150 0.025 0.5 0.600 0.030
‘ “/fl /16 10 07 0.150 0.020 0.6 1.300 0.OQ O
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO tt T 1EvAL Ut tL1 /03/3j
21 u4L
36 48 dS.0 08 12 05.0
JONAT’i#N CREEK
7.5 FAI DEA p G
T/,. LNTuC Y LAIcE
6 8t UG 4 M NE OF AU OP A
11E LEs 2111 0 ’.
4 0000 P EET
uu’ ’ ’
iio ii
oit : o
OO€ S
oooio
50051
50053
L)ATE
hUE
DEPT
‘ri0S—TOT
rt-iOS—flI
‘JO .Nu3
TOT cJEL
r’ l3—N
FL0
CONDUIT
F O’
O
O T-4O
N-IOTAL
N
rOrAL
RATE
FLU —MG0
TO
rJ4y
FEET
t G/L ‘-
r G/L fr
M(,/L
M(,/L
MG/L
1t eST MGD
MONTHLi
73,03,31
12 4S
u.070
0.013
U.i
0.4 0
0.01w
73/05/06
12 00
0.045
0.006
0.03
0.490
0.030
73/07,09
12 20
0.035
0. O OSic
o.ot’c
0.500
0.015
73/07/2’
12 20
0.115
0.O6’
0.02
0.960
0.03’ .
73/08/14
12 40
0.075
0.015
0.05
1.150
0. 0i3
73 /09,’27
13 30
0.155
0.009
0.01
0.730
0.078
74,02,03
1215
0.0,,0
0.015
0.4
0.400
0.035
74/03,16
1150
0.O i5
0. O lu
0.2
0.700
0.015
UE ’TH
_K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STOPET ItT 1EdAL LATL 1 /03/31
210401 LS21O4D1
36 44 00.0 0M8 09 00.0
LEL)bET1FJ CHE Ic (LEAT’IER C. IEE )
21 7.5 iI(O
T/I\E TUCXY
HWY 90 B ub AP OA 4 4I ‘ OF FAAON i Y
I1rJALES 111204
0000 FEET UEPTM
Ofl(71 OOe,j O 00625 O Oblo soo ,i soo5
DATE Tj E OEi- 1- —Tor ‘p-’0S-ijl5 O r’.u3 TOT ‘cJEL N-s3— ,, FLOW CONDUIT
FPO. 01 O flr () tj—t TAL ‘i FOTAL PAlL FLO*—MGO
TO i)A FEtI M(.,/L Mu/L r tlb/L MG/L Mt,/L INST MOD MONTHLY
73,03,31 13 00 0.015 0.010 0. 0.3 O 0.05b
73/05/06 13 05 0.015 0.007 0.3 0.150 0.0b7
73/07/09 13 00 0.010 0.00Sr 0.1 0.110 0.02)
73/07/25 13 dO o.o s s 0. 03i 0.3 2.5 0 0.360
73/08/14 13 30 0.075 0.030 0.3 1.100 0.115
73/09/27 13 55 0.010 0.OOSrc 0.1 0.790 0.075
73/11/11 12 00 ( .00b 0.0O 0.03 d.d O O 0.640
73/12,1111 3S u. 016 0.016 0.0j 1.150 0.052
74/01/13 1155 0.010 0.010 0.. 2.H00 1.150
74/02/03 13 00 0.015 0.010 ( 1.3 0.600 0.020
74/03,16 11 30 0.005 0.3 0. 00 0.Od O
_K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
sio r r.flt / L JATt .,7z,/(}3/3f
2104L1 L52 104E1
36 33 00.0 08 10 00.’)
SLu(it.) - I c.’
7. , Nl: w CONCOIW
1/P E1s.TuCrcT LAI 1.
rt . Y 1 j pQL)O •
1 1E ALEs
OF NLO’ CuP Ii
211 1204
0000 FEET uE r
)u5 - ’
00€?!
tJub 0
0O d
(10610
500S1
50053
UATE
Tj L
)E- T.
“ O —T0T
r- OS—t)P,
NO ,NU3
T T ¼JEL
‘J ’ N
FLOW
CONDUIT
-d0M
O
0 .Fi-i0
N—TOTAL
TOtAL
PAIL
FL3 —HG0
I)
OA’
F T
M3/L -
MU/L -
M 0/L
MG/L
MGIL
INST MUU
M(JN1rILY
73,03,31
1345
o. ObO
o.o13
0.2
0.4&0
0.061
73/05/06
14 Oo
0.060
0.016
J.i
0.460
0.105
73i07,oc
14 15
0.040
0. OOE
0.2
O. 0
0.069
73/07125
1420
u. .10
O.07
0.5
.100
0.147
73/011/14
1420
0.410
0.075
0.4
2.500
0.1 4
73/09/27
1445
0.045
0.012
0.1
0.7 0
0.130
73/li/il
1?4 1
0.0?
0. OIu
J.1
1.’u O
0.0 ei
73/12/01
0765
(.1ê
O.06ô
i.’+
1.1
0.032
74/01/13
12 30
0.02
0.020
0.4
2.7 o0
1.15u
74/c;2/03
13 45
0.020
0.4
2.000
0.035
74/03/16
1345
0.105
0.010
0.3
0. l 00
0.030
-------
ST0 . E1 t1-41 VAL t)ATE 7 /J3/.,1
2104F1 47X3F1
38 25 00.0 U 8 Ob 00.0
EA(,LL Cr Lt ”
21 ?.D UCti NAN TN—
T/ 1uCP Y LA’cL
rii.y 79 8 D(, 3 Mj W PA 1S LAND!’ .(, S A P(
11 i- L S 2111204
C. 0000 FEET uE TM
u0 -71 t,UNiI )0 ’25 00 10 S0ut 1 500b
t) ..rE TI E t E T-’ ° ‘ , —T0T tOS -L)IS ‘JO? u3 TtJT KJEL “ H3—N FLOw C NOUIT
0 ’i1 1O N—r31 L f01 .L ‘ ATL FLO*—MGD
Ti C Y FEtT MG/L - MG/L - ‘ /L ( /L Mt,/L INST M(.,U MONThLY
73/04/IS 0957 0.0 0 0.007 0.t ,ii o 0.008
73 O5/j0 10 2’) 0.040 0.013 0.1 0.440 0.031
73,06,10 11 30 (‘.025 0.00 14 0.01 0.440 0.0 18
73 07,0610 5’ 0.065 0.007 0.01 s 0.e.e o 0.014
13/08/12 10 30 0.090 0.009 0.02 0.720 0.008
73,o9/ 8 10 cO 0.0 50 0.005 0.1 0.730 0.310
73,10,13 1 30 u.u40 0.013 ‘).02 0.250 0.034
73/11/1011 3 ’ u.Q1 5 0.OO’ 0.0I c 0 . 300
73/12/01 10 ,0 0.065 0.008 0.1 0.?O0 0.020
74/01/12 10 10 u.020 0.012 u.1 0.700 0.028
74/02/02 10 25 o.0 55 0.010 0.? 0.400 0.015
74,02/16 11 15 u.005 0.005 0.1 0.100 0.020
74/01/021045 0.O2 0.005N o.1 0.100 0.055
KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
— K VALUE
-------
STQ- T - E1 !LIAL ut 1L7 ,/03/jf
210401 47X301
36 18 00.0 O M Ii 36.0
ØEST sA OY CHEErs
7.5 * 5 t) L,IISE
T, EN1jC’cY LA6E.
PUMP ST. t jON I MI N OLU SP 1l Gv1LL
1 1EPALtS 2l1l 0 ’
0000 FEET UEPTrI
Q0’. (I ‘)0 () (Jt) 5 fl0 10 50o 1 0053
UATE TI’tT t)E T— -‘ -tOS-TOT -‘- os—uis o 3 hiT ‘ JEL FLOm CO’ )U1T
rL-O i OF O THQ N—TOTAL T( LAL pATE -L0M—MGD
7) 1A FEET M(,/L M0/L PG/L M&L MG/L INST M60 MO” FriLY
73,04/15 OQ 20 0.060 0.011 0.01K 1.050 0.017
73/05/10 09 50 0.045 0.016 u.03 0.550 0. 02b
73,06/10 10 45 0.040 O.00 0.01 1.380 0.028
73/07/06 10 20 u.170 0.034 0.04 1.050 0.0 1
73/08/1210 S 0.2 0 0.056 0. 0. 60 0.100
73/o’ l08 0945 0.200 0.054 O.’+ 0.960 0.154
73/10,13 11 0-, 0.180 0.0 5 ).‘. 0.600 0.154
73/11/10 11 15 0.065 0.015 0.1 0.850
73 12,0110 30 o.12 , .03 0.500 U.0 8
74/01/12 10 05 0.050 0.02’ 0.? 0. ’ 00 0.046
74,02/02 10 00 0.105 0.035 ). 0.800 0.075
74/02/16 10 40 0.O 0 0.015 0.1 0.500 0.0 ?u
74/03/02 10 05 0. l Os 0.0 0. 0.700 0.110
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
S1 LT Er 1EVAL u. TL 7,/03/31
2104M1 47X3’l l
36 14 00.0 068 06 00.0
bIG SA D’r IVEk
21 I. c51(, SANDY TN
T/ cENTuC6Y LAKE
,i..V 69 O UMI’IN STATION O k 60TH
IILPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET 0E T i
00671 O06 0 0u6 5 00610 50051 500S
DATE Tj’E F)Er T, -iOS—T0T Pi- OS—D1S NOC’’\03 TOT rsJLL N-L,—N FLOw CONI)UIT
OF O THO N—rOTAL TOTAL ArL LU —MC D
TO jAr FEt.T ‘lOlL P MO/L M.,/L MG/L MG/L INST MGO MONTrILY
73/04/15 09 00 0.047 0.009 0.1 1.360 0.0 9
73/05/10 09 30 0.08 0.027 0.2 O.EbO 0.092
73/06/10 10 30 0.075 0.0 2D 0.1 0.720 0.034
73/07/06 09 55 u.170 0.012 0.02 1.760 0.470
73/08/12 0930 u.100 0.Ou i 0.01 1.150 U.1 ’ 0
73/G9/08 ( 9 25 0.140 0.009 0.016 1.780 0.083
73/10/131050 0.100 0.012 0.Olrc 0.k 0
73,11,1010 1 0.072 0.008 0.016 1.850 0.ItiO
73/12/01 10 1’) 0.180 0.040 0.03 0.t 0O 0.020
74/01,12 09 50 0.130 0.024 0.2 0.800 0.036
74/02/02 09 4 0.085 0.020 u.1 0.300 0.022
74/02/18 10 20 0.055 0.010 0.1 0. 00 0.025
74/03/02 09 45 0.OM0 0.010 0.1 1.200 0.090
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STPtT PET 1EVAL uATE7 ,/03/31
2104J1 47X3J1
3.5 15 30.0 087 5’ 20.0
C EL
2t 7.5 MCrcJNNUN TN
T,KEr TdCrcY LA’cr
k i b’ cuG UVEI PAS5 1 MI oF IAXO . TN
1 IEi- ’ALES 211120’s
0000 FEET DEPTH
0 ( 0 ,71 0 - ’ 00.510 50051 00S3
0 TE 1I L OF.’T’ -r,u —IOt . r-W —i)jS “0 . O3 TOT r ut L NI- .3—N FLO . CONDUIT
FC UM o O ir-iO N—lore.L TOTAL MATE FLOWMGD
T(j F Ay FtET t JL - MG/L P • 1t.,/L M ,/L MG/L INST MGD MONTIILY
73/04/15 0 1 ’ o.005c 0.005r 0.1 0.100 0.00 rc
73/05/10 0 ’ 0 0.008 0.008 0.1 0.100 . 0.012
73/0.5/10 10 0’) 0.005K o.005i 0.2 0.1O0 0.015
73/07/04 09 20 0.010 0.0054 0.2 0.lOOic 0.042
73/08/12 09 05 0.010 0.005r 0.2 0.6.50 0.140
73/0 ,’08 09 00 0.0O5c 0.005 ! ’ 0. 0.750 0.252
73/10,1310 -‘- o.c . 1o 0.00.5 0.2 0.lOOr 0.O1Q
73/11/10 (0 ‘j u.005 0.005r 0.1 0. 00 0.13u
73/12,0109 4U 0.035 0.005r ). 0.1004 0.00.5
73/1?,0 12 1’ ( u.u lO 0.005K 0.1 0.100 0.01.5
74/01/120930 0.009 0.008 ( 3.4 0.400 0.01 ,
74/02,020920 0.010 0.005 0.2 0.100K 0.010
74/02/16 0 55 0. 005 K 0.005K 0.3 0.100 0.010
74/03,0? (5 5 u.015 0.0 0 5c (‘.2 0.300 0.030
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDI CATED
-------
STOPET LT,-’IEVAL uATE 7 /03/31
2104rc1 47*3K1
3b 11 13.0 087 59 07.0
SUL HUp C’ ELr(
7.5 ‘iA ’Or CREEK
1/ LN1uC cy L P(L
2ND Y D 6RDG N &M 4hEATLEY C€MtTtl Y
11E”>ALES 211120’.
0000 FELT OLPI’-,
OMTE
F ‘ c)’ •
I i )
73/0 ./I5
73/05/14
73/06/14
73 /f, 7/29
73/12/09
74/02/02
74/0 2/27
74/03/2 ’
TIME )EPT-
oF
‘)AY F1. T
15 c”
14 45
11 53
12 45
11 50
13 20
13 00
10 2()
0Ub ’ 5
00 ’T1
0 , 1 O)
00 2
00o10
50051
50053
‘ ‘—OS—TOT
HO5—L,jS
O- TI1()
NO Nu3
N—TOrML
roT “JEL
N
N ’-43—N
TOTAL
‘LOw
RAIL
CONDUIT
FLOW—MGD
MG/L pJ
M(j/L P
MC,/L
rlC,/L
Htj/L
INST MGD
M(JNTMLY
0 .oOSic
0.005K
0.0 10
0.010
0.008
0.005K
0.015
0 • DUSK
0 • 005
0 • 008
0.007
0.008
0 • 005r
0.005
o.01 c
0.01
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0 • 35
0.800
1.600
O.1 0
0. 100 1 ’
0.100 1 ’
0.500
0. 100,c
0.010
0.02b
0 • 050
0.034
0 • 022
0 • 035
o • 025
0 • 030
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO ET PET IE iAL DATE 7 /u3/3i
21 04L1 47X3L1
36 0 31.0 0d7 7 46.0
HARMON C (EEpc
7.5 MARMUN C EEpc
1/, ENTUCP¼Y LAKE
DRY r D RUL,
1 1 F ’ALES
4
00671
0063’ )
O0h 5
00610
50051
O053
DATE
TJ ’ ’E
‘iEPT
P i05—TOT
P 0S—0jS
NO N03
TOT rs.-JLL
N.- 3—N
FL0
CONDUIT
FPO ”
OF
O FHO
e—T0TAL
N
TOTAL
RATE
FLUØ—MGD
ro
FEt.T
“GIL - ‘
M.,/L p
h (.,/L
M(,/L
MG/L
INST M&D
MONTHLY
NE4’ NA’ lON C’ E C ’,URC ’i
211 1204
0000 FEET uETh
73,04/14
14
30
0.006
0.005K
0.1
1.960
0.056
73/05/14
14
30
0.010
0.010
0.2
1 .600
0.040
73/06/14
1?
15
0.010
0.007
0.3
0.780
0.048
73/o7/2
11
4 ’-’
O.005 ’<
0.OOSr.
0.3
0.100”
0.020
73/08/11
12
10
0.010
0.00 5K
0.3
0.200
0.125
73/09/08
11
00
0.005”
0.00 5K
0.4
0.540
0.106
73/10/13
10
50
0.010
0.009
0.3
U. ’ - U0
0.36(1
73/11/11
14
15
0.015
0.0O5 ”
0.1
0.100”
0.014
73/12/09
11
30
0.008
0.008
U.S
0.200
0.0 0
74/01/12
10
30
0.00 13
0.OOb
0.4
0.100K
0.01e
74/02/10
12
15
0.005
0.006
0.2
0.100k
0.015
74/02/27
12
46
0.015
0.005
0.2
0.500
0.010
74/03/28
10
06
0.005<
0.00S
0.2
O.100n
0.017
— K VALUE KNOWN TO
INDICATED
BE LESS THAN
-------
ST0 ET PET 1EvAL J4TE 7 ,/03/31
104M1 47X3 4 1
36 0’. 30.0 088 02 30.0
BEAVEDAM CkEEP(
21 7., CAMUEN,TN
r/KE TucKY LA’ L
bNL)G(ST r D ci0 4 3)2 1 OF EVA
11 ALES 2l11 04
0000 FEET oEs-1#
J0”65 0O 71 u0 0 O0 E 00610 50051
DATE TI DEPT-’ PrtQ5T jT r - 0SU1S NO2 ’ U3 T 3T ‘SJLL N 13N FL0 C0NC) J1T
FI OM uF 0 T#O N—TOTAL N rorAL ATt FLO —P4GD
10 QAY FEET P4( /L 1’ MG/L P MO/L ‘lL,/L M /L INST MGD MONTrILY
73/04/14 14 0 u.OO5ic 0.005tc 0.1 o.loo 0.013
73/05/14 14 00 0.010 0.006 0.2 0.750 0.024
73/06,14 12 40 0.022 0.008 0.2 0.250 0.013
73/07/29 11 00 0.010 0.O O Sic 0.3 0.110 0.032
73/08/11 12 50 0.010 0.005 K 0.2 1.050 0.132
73/09/08 10 40 0.015 0.005K 0.2 0.820 0.210
73/10/13 11 1’i 0.005k 0.005K 0.1 0.600 0.099
73/11/11 1400 0.005K 0.005K 0.05 0.400 0.018
73/12/091120 0.005K 0.005i 0.2 0.l00 0.012
74/01/120955 0.010 0.005K u.3 0.100 0.016
74/02/10 12 ‘ .5 (‘.010 0.010 0.? 0.100K 0.005
74/02/27 12 30 0.015 0.010 0.2 0.400 0.025
74/03/28 09 50 0.005K 0.OOSic 0.1 0.300 0.040
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
I’ b
-------
STu- ET PET’ 1EVAL u TE 7D/03/3l
2104N1 47X3N1
3b 03 30.0 U 8 04 30.0
t tJ ,-N 10E C. LEr
d l 1.5 CAr DE TN
1/,ctNTUC’(Y LAict
1 04i h’ i)t., . 1 E CITy LL ITS CAML,tN
11LI ’AL S 2111 0’.
4 0000 FEET 1’TI
00 ’71 u0 ,. t) 0O 25 00610 50051 O053
)ATE ri 0EPT -. --ioS—T T - ,QS—ç S riO e o3 TOT IcJEL r’ 3—N FL0 . CO’JDUIT
CF 0—rhO N—TOT L TOTAL . 4TE FLO —MGO
to jAy FEEt lw/L 4 M(,/L F-’ M(,/L MG/L MG/L INST ‘ ,u FONTr LY
73/04/141’ Ofl u.010 0.uUSrs 0.1 1.100 0.036
73/05/14 13 50 0.015 0. O OSPc 0.1 1.1’ 0 0.03
73/06/14 12 4 0.055 0.011 0.1 1.610 0.220
73/07/29 10 45 0. Oê O o.005 c 0.1 0.320 0.100
73/O /11 13 0’) 0.020 0.O0S 0.02 0.270 0.048
73/09/08 10 30 0.015 0.005K 0.1 1.050 0.290
73/10/13 11 2:’ 0.010 0.0oS ’ 0.1 1.100 0.4’iO
73/11/11 1340 u.010 0.005” 0.0 0.d50 0.019
73/1 /09 11 l ’ 0.025 0.012 0.1 0.200 0.016
74/ 1)1/12 0945 0.020 0.00w 0.3 0.400 0.02b
74/02/1011 ‘. ‘ 0.025 0.005k 0.2 0.400 0.025
74/02/27 12 20 0.020 0.010 0.1 1.000 0.045
74/03/28 09 45 0.010 0.005K 0.1 0.100 0.040
KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
— K VALUE
-------
STQ T ETP1tVAL L ”TF 7 ,/03/31
10’. 1 47X3P1
36 03 00.0 08 04 30.0
CY ES C EEi<
I. CAMDLN TN
T/ LN1UCKY L 3KE
1.5 SE C DEN OFF
1 IEPAitS
4
D1’ T RD 100 YI C
2111204
000u FE .T OEP1 -i
0Ubb
‘)Ob/1
00630
J0 6 5
00610
50051
50053
)ATE
T1 ’E
IJE-’T’
Pi- OS—T0T
-OS—O1S
O Nu3
TOT KJEL
‘i3—N
FLO4
C0r OUIT
F 0U
OF
U. THO
N—IuT4L
t
TOTAL
RATE
FLO —MGO
To
DAy
FEET
MO/L -
iG/L
HG/L
MG/L
INST M(,D
MONTHLY
73/04/14
13 20
0.115
0.0i.4
0.1
0.’- 40
0.200
73/05,14
12 3
0.130
0.060
0.
1.260
0.270
73/06/14
13 00
0.180
0.140
0.3
0. 9 b0
0.180
73/07,29
10 30
0.960
0.740
0.3
1.6 80
0 . 50
73/08,11
13 2
o. 2S
0.580
0.8
1.680
0.700
73/09/08
13 20
1.250
1.000
0.9
2.700
73/10,13
1140
1. INO
0.900
0.9
3.500
1.900
73 /11,11
13 J’
U.blO
0.315
0.4
1.200
O.Sb s
73,12/09
1050
0.1 0
0.120
0.3
O.’,00
0.192
74,01,1?
0430
0.070
0.012
0.3
0.600
0.0 O
74,02/10
1130
0.130
0.040
0.3
0.’.00
0.120
74/02/27
11 40
0.100
0.040
0.3
0.600
0.110
74,03,28
12 00
0.105
0.045
0.2
0.400
0.135
4 4
-------
.?104u1 47 3O1
3 01 00.0 O 8 00 00.0
TENNES E . M1vE
7.5 CAMDEN TN
I/r\ENrUC” Y L4 ’cL
MP L J l Y 70
1 1E LLs
ST T i ET JtVAL uATE7 /03/31
2111204
0000 F .tT
uE—Th
)C) I,-,
‘)0t 7l
0 ’ 10
0u .25
00610
5u051
th TE
T1
DE T-
P ,-iOS—TOT
.-i0 —L’IS
O2 NU3
TOT t JEL
-3—t’d
FLO.
CONDUIT
F’ O ’
OF
u-Tr40
N—1OTAL
N
TOTAL
A1E
FLO —MGO
T
v
F E.T
MG/L ‘-‘
M( /L P
MGJL
M(,/L
HG/L
INST MGI)
MONThLY
73/04/1’
10 40
0.070
0.039
0.4
1.000
0.054
73/05/1’
ii 50
0.065
0.032
0.5
1.0 0
0.0 b
73/06/14
10 5
0.0 35
0.044
0.’
2. 1300
0.1?0
73/Od/il
73/09/08
122’
ii 40
u.0’
0.065
0. 03t
0.030
0.3
0.3
0.390
0.4130
u.o i
0.0’ 2
73/10/13
0.090
0.050
0.
0.?75
0.04
73/11/10
11 30
0.0 0
0.04
0.4
1.300
0.031
73/12/08
13 30
0.110
0.O M
0. ..
1.200
0.U2
74/01/12
13 .30
0.075
0.032
0.3
0.300
0.O 0
74/02/10
11 00
0.210
0.06
0.6
0. 00
0.010
74/fl?/27
09 00
0.095
(J.035
0.5
0.1300
0,030
74/03/29
09 45
0.075
0.040
0.6
0.300
0.060
-------
51O ET ftT- .1EvAL Li rE 75/u3/J1
10 1 47X3P1
3f 03 00.0 0 7 SS 30.’)
T eACE C EEI’
21 7.5 JUr1 iSONv1LLE
T/r E TUC’ LAKE
OI 1 1 G .
11t PALrS
4
— K VALUE
KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
Mj r OF L)E VCP
2111204
0000 FEET U -Tri
iu8e
00571
C)U5tO
00h 5
00 1’)
500 1
50053
jtTE
TI..E
OE T-
-‘riOS—TOT
-iOS—J1S
‘J0 NIj3
TOT Pc.JEL
N- 3—N
FL0
CONDUIT
F. Q”
OF
O’”’T-iO
N—7OTAL
N
UTAL
NATtI
LOw—MGO
TO
u4v
FtI t IT
M( /L
MG/L
MO/L
MG/L
U(,/L
INST MGD
MU 4THLY
73/04/14
10 20
0.090
0.O t ,4
0.d
1.320
v.021
73/0 /14
11 30
0.090
O.0b6
0.3
0.lb O
0.021
73/06/1k
10 05
0.125
0.115
0.5
0.230
0.010
73/07/29
0 3’)
0.170
0.160
0.3
O.l00
u.014
73/0 ’ /11
13 00
u.170
0.1 0
0. ’
2.400
73/09/08
13
05
(i.190
0.173
0.2
0.330
0.018
73/10/13
J.2 0
0.2 0
J.
0.lOOr
0.024
73,11,10
1030
u.3 15
0.290
U.’.
0.ioO”
o.oj
73/12,06
1400
u.I 0
0.140
o.
0.1O0
0.01
74/01/12
1245
0.055
0.032
0.7
0.100
0.01
74/02,10
08 00
0.110
0.100
0.
0.200
0.020
74/02/27
09 55
u.l1S
0.070
0.5
0.soo
0.020
74/(13/29
09
15
0.135
0.125
0.4
0.100
-------
STOPET kET 1EV L Di TF_’(5/03/j1
10’ S1 47x 3S1
3 09 00.0 Gd! 5 00.0
LITTLE 1L LANO CREEK
21 1., l1ALL’ C , TN
T/ 1SENTUCKY Ltd r.
DL T i D r
-------
STO iT ET. iEVAL uT 7 /0j/ji
210411 47X3T 1
b 10 00.0 (}‘•17 51 00.0
616 , ICt-lLANO
21 1. hALt C’è, TN
1/,cENIuCrc r LAi E
OIkl NL, ‘ ‘Lib 1
1 iE ALES
4
Ij ATE
F - U
TO
00 f , ’
00 ,71
0 - 0
00i25
fl061
coosi
00,3
T 111
DEPr—
Pi-.o —TOT
P 0S—DI
r n r• u3
TOT KJEL
-3—t
FLO.
CONDUIT
OF
U-ThU
N.1(ITAL
. .
TOTAL
- ATt
FLO.—MGD
IA
FEc.r
u/L
MG/L i
L1Ij/
M(,/L
MG/L
INST Gu
MC,NrhLV
q OF T 1N1Ty
211 i2O
0000 $-EtT L E—Ti-
73/04/14
09
00
u.O’
0.005r
0.02
0. 90
0.017
73/OS/16
09
07
0.010
0.009
0.2
O.4 O
0.011
?3/Qb/14
09
12
0.015
0.010
0.2
0.110
0.010
73/07/29
09
00
0.010
0.0G&
0.2
0.100k
0.014
73/(W/1i
10
55
0.015
0.013
0.1
0.350
0.012
73/09/06
10
10
0.010
0.010
0.1
1.960
0.040
73/10/13
0.010
hI
0.100K
0.OIr
73/11/10
09
:io
0.015
n.ui
0.1
0.150
0.00 3
73/12/08
12
30
0.030
0.o1
u.
0.200
0.012
74/01/12
09
30
0.0 0
0.012
0.D
0.200
0.01
74/02/10
fl
30
0.005
0.005
.2
0.400
0.0/0
74/02/27
10
45
0.020
0.3
0.700
0.032
74/03/29
08
I
0.005
0. I05
0..
0.100 ”
0.020
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
ST0 1 T ‘ Er JE. AL T7’/ 3/3I
2104u1 4!X3U1
36 15 30.0 0t37 52 30.0
*hIT1 u. ,( LkEEr
21 7. Tr. . Ar T P4
T/, ENTuCK LAtcE
- 1rLoA < -t) L u t M I S OF MCI I .NO
11E L S 211120.
0000 FEET LJE TH
00h6 00671 Otj ’J J 00625 0O 10 50051 50053
U TE 11 E EPt .‘riU T()T Pr OSC,JS N0 .1 )3 TUf r JEL N.-43—c . FLOW C0r aIUIT
F-SO’ 0r ORTrl ,j J—IjIAL rorAL RATE FLO ’i— G0
T ) UA Ft 1 Mt /L MG/L MG/L M(,/L INST 4Gu MI)N1NLY
73/04/151200 u.O10 0.005 0.01 . 0. 70 o.O Ob
73/0- /1O 1? 30 0.010 0.1 0.100i 0.019
73/rj / [ 1300 u.015 o.o0 0.2 0.170 0.035
73/07/06 1 3 ii.01 0.012 (i.1 0.110 0.012
73/ON/12 1200 0.020 0.011 0.1 0.200 0. O lb
73/0’ /08 13 00 0.015 0.014 0.1 2.600 0.460
73/10/13 1 55 ‘j.020 u.01F 0.1 0.450 0.014
73 11 101335 u.012 0.01? u.0 . 0.400 0.013
73/12/01 12 37 0.03’, 0.012 0.6 0.500 0.005
74/01/121200 0.040 0.012 0.4 0.100 0.005k
74/02/02 11 40 0.005 0.005 0.2 0. 00 0.015
74/02/16 12 20 0.005K 0.005K 0.1 0.200 0.005
74/03/02 12 04 0.0 0 0.005 0.2 0.bO O 0.020
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO .ET ET *ItTVAL L)AIE 7 /03/3l
21u6 1 47X3 1
3 ” 19 00.0 0 *7 54 30.0
CAr C EErc
dl 7.5 ‘iCr..1Nr *ON
t/s’Er’.1uC Y L4 ct
1Tt0At i ,.) ciI(U(, •J Mj s OFMCKINP.ION
liE Lc. 2111204
0000 LLT 1)EPTN
)t TE
F .. r)
TO
73/04/lb
73’Oi/ 10
73/06/10
73/07/06
73/ OR/ 12
73/0 /08
73/ 10/13
73/11/10
73/ 12/0 1
74/01 / 12
74/02/02
74/02/16
74/ 03/02
‘(5-s”
00671
OObjO
00 ’c5
OOtlO
suosi
50053
iO TUT
r hQS iS
C.4T ’u
NO NU3
r 4—TOT L
TI)T “JEL
N
Nk3—N
TOTAL
FLOa
WAfl.
L(ffiDULT
FL1J —MGD
Mo/( P
Mt,/L
v4(,/L
M(,/L
INST M&I)
MONrHLY
T ’f C L-t—
OF
)A’V r T
11 45
1? 05
12 45
13 15
11 30
11 40
1? 45
13 l4
12 20
11 50
11 27
12 10
11 45
0.010
• 0,’5
0 • 0 Id
u.O1S
u.015
0.010
o • 040
0 • 030
O • 03s
0.015
u.015
0.005
0.015
0 • 0u5r
0.010
0.007
0.009
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.010
0.012
0.005
O •
0 .0D5r
0.1
0.1
0.d
0.1
U. I
0.1
0 • I
ii• 02
0.b
0.4
0.1
(1.1
0.460
0.110
2.600
0 • 120
0.110
0.440
0 • I 00rc
0. l00 ’
0 • lOOK
0 • 100
0 • 200
0 • 100i
0.d O O
0 • 00*,
0.037
0 • 063
0 .U1t
0.010
0 •
0 .0CC,
0.007
0 • 00
0 .0Q5 c
0.015
0 .00s c
0 • 055
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STQ ET PETPIEVAL .‘ TE.7 /03/31’
2104w 1 7X3.1
20 00.0 0 S7 55 00.0
-iuiC t C EEi
21 l.A ‘iCPc1N ON TN
T/,¼ENTUC Y LAKL
T O b31 b D 2 MI N OF C 1NN ,N
11E Lr.S 21112)4
0000 FEET I) PTi-j
00 71 u0 j0 0of -’5 00 10 50051
OATE TI E I)E, T,- P- 0S—T(iT OS— 1 N0c. NU3 101 r JLL NH3—N FLOw CONDUIr
FPOM O O T O N—Tul AL N TOIAL P TL 1L0 .j—MGO
10 r)4 FEtJ MG/L MG/L M(,/L MC,/L MG/L INST MGI) MONTHLY
73/04/IS 1130 u.00 ’ 0.005 0.01K 1.000 0.018
73/05/10 11 55 0.0(15 0.1 0.100’ 0.013
73/0 ’/I0 1230 0.010 0.007 0.1 0.110 0.007
73/07/061305 0.010 O.00 0.1 0.1 i0 0.013
73/08/12 11 35 0.015 0.009 0.1 0.100K 0.005K
73/09/08 11 30 0.015 0.011 0.1 1.H90 0.300
73/10/13123 0.013 0.1 O.lOCr( 0.03’.
73/11/101310 0.035 0.010 0.0 1.000 (J.0e4
73/12/01 12 10 0.040 0.012 0.5 0.100P 0.005K
74/01/121140 0.020 0.012 11.4 0.300 0.008
74/02/02 11 20 0.035 0.005 u . 0.200 0.010
74/02/1 12 04 0.010 0.005K 0.1 0.lOOr( 0.005K
74/03/02 11 35 o.O1S 0. 005K 0.1 0.200 0.025
KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
— K VALUE
-------
STO -E.T ET 1EVAL 0 .Tt 75/03/31
2104A1 47X3X1
36 23 00.0 0 7 5 00.0
LEATr Lr 00D Cr EEr
21 7.5 STANDING ROC
T/r LNTuCrcY LAI E
ST . L) 631 f Do
1 1&ALt S
‘4
00 6D
00e (1
0Oai0
u0f d5
00610
50031
50051
OAIE
T1 E
OEPT’-’
Pr’OS—TOT
,-“OS—UiS
O e . u3
TOT r JEL
•N i3—N
FL0
CONOUIT
FkO’4
0
w41’-O
N—RjT L
‘i
rOTAL
RATE
FLO —MGD
TO
‘ AY
FEET
lO/L ‘
MG/L
M .,/L
Mt,/L
MG/L
INST iGO
MONTHLY
6 I N OF ,CK1N .dTh
2111204
0000 FE 1 L)L- TI’
73/04/15
11
10
u.O05r
0.005r¼
0.02
0.100k
0.0051c
73/05/10
11
0
0.010
0.010
u.1
3.600
0.OCIä
73/06/10
12
1
0.010
0.uOSK
0.1
0.100’(
0.OOSP(
73,07,06
12
50
0.010
0.00 ’
0.2
0.100 ’
0.010
73/08/12
11
25
0.015
0.007
0.1
O.lOOrc
0.OOSI
73/09/08
11
20
0.010
0.005
u.1
3.000
0.330
73/11/13
12
2 ’
0.011
0.011
0.1
0.lOOtc
0.025
73/11/10
13
0t
0.030
0.0u i
0.02
1.250
0.126
73/12/01
12
00
0.030
0.008
0.
0.200
O.O Ob
74/01/12
11
30
0.010
0.008
(J.’.
0.100
0.00S
74/02/02
11
10
0.005 (
0.O05r
0.2
0.100 c
0.015
74/02/16
11
57
u.005
0.005 <
0.1
0.100 ’
0.005 K
74/03/02
11
4
0.010
0.005
0.1
0.500
0.050
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO- LT RtT iEVAL LJt.I l)/O 3 /31
21 04y1 47.(3Y1
3t ?6 00.0 U 48 00 00.0
TAr’ DJ G r DCP C EE c
fl 7.5 TANO1NG OC
T/, E TuCicY L KC.
LI(’r )l . D - -00 1 Mj OF M JLrjE Y iILL
11 .’ALES 2ll1 P’ .
‘. 0000 fELT UE T i
00671
ou iO
00 ?
00611
, Ju 1
50053
)t.TE
TI
‘ 1fPT,-,
i0,—TT
rriUS—Dl ’
O .Nu3
Tur r’JLL
a ’- i—N
FLU.
CONDUIT
F O’
Ut
Or-TriO
l—1UF L
TOTAL
NATt
FLOw—MGD
rj
tjAY
FILl
M U/L -
MU/L P
Mb/L
MC3/L
MG/L
INST MGO
-4ON1MLY
73/0’./18
10
50
u.ulu
0.005r
0.0 ..
1.050
73/05/10
11
1
Ca.O 0
0.012
u.
. ..ooo
0.0 .-s
73/06/10
11
50
0.035
0.0U r .
0.1
2.310
0.100
73/07/of.
I?
2-’
0.015
0.010
0.2
0.100 ”
0.013
73/08/12
11
05
0.015
0.011
0.2
fl.100
0.OOSr .
73/O9/Ol -
10
55
0.015
0.013
0.1
3.400
0.2 2
73/10/li
1?
in
n.oi
0.1
0.100 ’.
o .o1
3/1l/10
124
0.0 20
0.010
u. Oë
0 .L ,0
0.o1i
73/12/01
11
40
0.045
0.0Ib
0.
0.100
‘J. O Ob
74/01/12
11
15
0.020
0.012
0.,
0.700
0.008
74,02/02
11)
5
u.015
0.010
0.3
0.250
0.015
74/02/16
11
35
u.1J05
0.00 ,
0.?
O.100 .
0.00”
74/03/02
11
13
0.020
0.010
0.1
0.300
0.030
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STO tTT ETA1EvAL 0AT . 75/03/31
21 04Z I
3b 10 ‘,..0 (j87 59 10.0
SULP 1U C E’c
I. rlA 4(lN Ce EEIc
T/rc ’ITLJCIc LAIcE
t,- Li , O. ‘J S (j qrl€.ATLEY Ct.MfrtE .v
l Iti-ALE’, 2111204
0000 LtT vETb
rj0 71 U0ô? 00( 1u 00S1 00S3
OAT . 1J L uE T— P- Q ,—TQT F- r.OS—UJS Nfl ”. i iur KJEL FLU- LtJNOUIT
F 0 O- 1r’O N—IU1(.L TOTAL iATE FLOMGO
Ti ., F -, MC,/L fr( ’/L M(,/L MG/L INST MGD MOt’JFHLY
73,07,2 12 10 0.005 c 0.005 c 0.1 0.100K 0.028
73/08/12 12 00 J.01o 0. O O Src 0.2 0.250 0.06i
74/01,1? 1100 0.010 0.008 0.1 0.100 0.012
7’/’ 2,10 13 4( 0.005 0.00 r 0.1 0.200 0.0 o
74/02/27 13 05 0.015 0.010 0.1 0.200 0.0 0
74/03,2 10 25 0.005r 0.OO5r 0.1 0.100 0.032
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
ST0 ET Er IEJAL 1E7,/(,3/3
c104 1 4S21 04d1
P005 00
36 Id D7.0 0 E4 1 i ‘.0.0
P pIS MAIN PLANT
21 r-i . Y Co rIWY M4
T/,’ TUCr ’r LAKE
TCi*N L- LE.”
214 i204
0000 FEET
I)L . TP-.
w6f
00671
u Otj O
00
00610 S0O 1 50053
UATE
TI E
E -T’
i —TOT
“iU uI’,
NOc. .NU3
Tut r JLL
43—N FLOW CONUuIT
FL’). .
jF
O-tI-.O
N—IOFAL
.
TOIAL RATE FLO —MGO
TO
UA
ET
;4(,/L -
ML,/L r’
M0/L
MG/L
MG/L INST MbO M( )”1TP1LY
73/06/07
11 00
CPCT—
1.900
1.”OO
3.4
9.900
3.250 2.000 1.700
73 ,06/07
16 0)
73/01/1?
10 00
CPU’ ,—
8.300
S.M0O
.0
3. 400
1.3 0 1.500 1.700
73/07/12
iS 00
73/06/09
10 0 ’)
CP(T)—
4.? J0
‘e.1 00
4.0
10.500
5.100 1.400 1.500
73 ,oa/09
14 00
73/09/06
04 0”
CPCT—
.7
11.000
1.300 1.500
73/09/06
11 30
73/10/04
09 00
CP(T )—
4.500
3.700
u.
14.000
11.OuO 1.400 1.300
73/10/04
11 00
73/11/09
u7 00
CPU)—
i. ”00
2. 0O
(.
8.d O O
4.500 1.d40 i.soo
73/11/09
11 0 )
73/12/06
lu 00
CP(fl—
2.600
1.800
0.4
14.000
5.500 1.400 1.400
73/12/06
14 00
74/01/02
10 00
CP(T)—
2.000
1.650
0.$
14.500
4.600 1.500 1.400
74/01/02
14 00
14/02/0€
1w 0(
CP(T)—
1. 50
1.180
0.4
7.700
2.160 1.’i O o 1. 00
74/02/06
14 0
74/03/07
10 ()i)
CP(T—
-.000
1.7 0
(i.(
12.OuO
4.500 1.i O 1.500
74/n- /Q7
1 00
74, )4/04
()j)
CP(F) —
.700
2.100
0.7
‘ .d0I)
3.800 1.400 1.500
74/fl ’ ./04
16 G’
74/0 /02
10 00
CPU)—
2.500
1.d O O
0.3
12.000
4. 00 1. 00 1.500
74/05/02
14 00
-------
STO- ET r ET ftVAL ()‘ 1L 7D/03/ 3 1
c 1O431 P0210431
3b iT 25.0 0d 18 12.0
PA j5 LAbOON
21 .- ‘ P Y CO P1 Y MAp
T/KLNI.CcY LAr c.
rAiL FUPOc C EE
1 it.I- ’ALc.S
2L4i 04
0000 FEET DEP1H
( - ,
0O ’71
0 0 JO
00 .d
QOblO
50051
005
DATE
TI’E
JE T ’
P )S—TO1
P 0S—j1S
TOT
3—N
FL0
COr 0ULT
F’ O
Or
O ’ThU
NTOTAL
N
TOTAL
WATF
FLQ MG0
10
Ar
FEET
‘. /L
‘ lG/L r
M fL
M0/L
M(j/L
INST M(.,I)
MONTrILY
73/05/07
10 45
.b00
6.200
0. ’ 3O
0.b40
1.000
73/07/1?
1000
+.4O0
2.100
0.4
la.900
0.9u0
0.570
0.710
73/O8/0’
10 or,
7.000
D.7 00
u.l
12.bOO
1.260
0.500
0.570
73/O’ /06
09 00
0.0’
11.500
0.430
0.550
73/10/04
0845
M.500
4.000
0.1
11.000
1.470
0.490
0.550
73/11/01
0800
9. ’ O0
l.r 00
0.3
1 ’.0O0
3.9 ’ 0
0.300
0.500
73/12/13
(•i9 i
7.900
S.M00
0.1
16. 00
3.100
0. 00
0.600
74/01/10
r 9 4 ’
4.900
+.uOO
0.3
4. 0U
2.240
0.400
0.450
74/02/07
10 00
‘.500
3. ’.OO
0.1
6.000
1.120
0.700
0.570
74/01/07
09 00
5.000
3.450
u.1
8. OO
1. SOu
0.650
0.540
74/1)4/04
09 1
‘.000
3.600
0.2
8.000
2.200
0.620
0. 40
74/05/0?
09 Oil
4.200
2.700
0.1
11.000
1.750
0.720
0.480
-------
STW-ET LT 1 / L )ATE./ /fl3/it
210432 PD210 ’ .3
36 17 30.0 0 d 17 05.0
PAp’jS LA ,OON J
21 c’ r Y CO -1w,Y ‘ .iA )
T/KEr tJCK( LAKt
AjLc Fu CkL ,c
1 1Li-AL ,
4
‘ 0 0 0 0 94
21’. 04
0000 FEtT [ )EPTH
u. 5 -
00671
u)t j 0
00b 5
00610
5u051
50053
u4TE
T1’ E
Ur ’f-
-iJ5—T )f
-OS—U1
03
TOT ‘J L
i—
FLOW
LONDUIT
0•
0
U41r, .,
N—lJIAL
‘
TOTAL
NATE
LUw—MGD
T’
F E1
‘ 0,L
‘ (,/L k
rt,/L
MG/C
MG/L
1 .S1 MG [ ,
MUNTPILY
73/06/07
11 00
33.500
33.500
J.0
0.3’ O
0.040
0.030
73/07/12
1030
4b.000
45.000
0.1
14.700
0.039
0.030
0.040
73/09/09
1015
44.000
4..000
0.1
16.000
0.670
0.020
0.030
7 3 /og/o6
0645
0.03
14.000
0.030
0.040
73i1fl/04
0945
61.000
26.000
0.03
10.500
0.865
0.030
0.050
fl/11/01
‘1900
66.000
53.000
0.1
12.OOo
0.131k
0.040
0.040
73/1 /13
(9 uO
‘ .‘ .000
4rs.(100
u.1
11.000
0.280
0.045
0.070
74/01/10
O’ 30
4. ( ’0
31. OuO
u .l
5. 00
0.210
0.060
0.070
74,02/01
0 ’ 30
,3.000
92.500
o.1
7.700
0.110
0.060
0.060
74/03/07
0830
2.5°0
5?.500
0.0’.
10.000
0.050K
0.040
0.040
74/04/04
0 .5
bi.000
52.000
0.1
11.000
0.OSOic
0.040
0.040
74/05/02
09 iD
54.000
50.000
0.04
12.000
0.180
0.020
0.040
— K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
S1’ D—ET ‘Et- 1tv L ,j’ tt l ,/o3/ l
d10 .4l ‘ O210441
3s 16 22.0 ORB 19 10.0
A- 1, LAuUtYJ S
21 &Ig LU r1 Y IAP
r/ E ruc
CL1F Y C’ Lr.
I 1tI’MLt.
4
214 12j
0000 rEET i.L Th
00’,71
‘ i’
00o 25
OtJojO
500 ,
,0O 3
UAIE
TI .E
-‘T.-
- US—TtjT
-, t jS—U1S
N0c .” u3
TOT NJ .L
I-ti—N
FLOn
LO’ L,ULT
0’
ii
0 1hu
N—T jF. 1L
TOIAL
-Alt.
FLu MC,0
10
‘r
Ft.t..l
M0/L -
M(,/L -
-u/L
M( /L
‘t /L
INST MGU
MONTHLY
73/06/07
10 30
3.-’30
3.300
U.1
.1OO
2.000
0.110
0.130
73/07/1?
10 4
7.600
5.000
u.0
18. iO0
3.000
0.030
0.050
73/0 3fO
10 30
7. 00
0.05
15.000
1.100
0.020
0.030
73,09/0
O 3 30
0.01
12.000
0.024
0.040
73/10/04
0 , Ci
12.250
1o.’ou
0.1
21.000
1.100
0.025
0.040
73/11,01
0845
13.500
11.000
u.
i’ . oo
1.150
O.oei
0.030
73 / 1 ?/t3
‘) 3(.
. ()I)
- .ij(, j
.j
15.00()
. 600
0.035
0.060
74/01,10
0’ ol ,
t.300
.jju
uJ. ’
1U.50o
‘..30 0
0.Oj O
0.040
l4/u. /O7
‘i-i
0’)
,.0
- ..4C, )
0.0-.
11.000
0.100
0.070
0.070
74/03,07
09 u
b.000
5.000
0.04
1 .uo0
3.500
0.O 0
0.090
74/114/Q4
‘)‘ 30
5. 00
4.400
0.)
11.000
2. 00
u.OH O
0.090
76/OSlo?
flb 45
.s00
‘.sou
0.0-.
14.000
. .500
0.090
0.100
-------
cTO- Et LT ( L /0
d10’.51 D 210’eSl
J 00 0.0 087 C 7 o•o
Nt. J0riN. u VILLt
21 7. JUr1 SUNVjLL .
T/r E TuC\ L4
.j1I41I-. INJIAf . CkCLK
1 1E ’t.L
•+
001 2 u 0
214 1 2u’.
0000 frEEr Ut TPi
i i’ ’ i
uO”,71
,C- I
O0e 5
00 . 10
500 1
0053
). iTL
TI t
)E 1
.-‘-‘lJ —1(jJ
O5—t 1
\Oc- s’ tj3
TijT NJtL
3— ’ .
FLu
LONUjir
fr’O’
0
0- Fr(j
—t)I L
‘1
‘OTAL
rIMTF
L0 MGL)
T)
“
I
M ,/L
(‘/L
t ,’L
G/L
‘ i.,/L
1 ST
4u’ ThLY
7110s/07
07 0 1
J.50
1. lu O
u.0
1.000
0.2”0
0.17?
73/07/05
oN 30
3.200
2.730
0.2
4.700
0.250
0.075
0.225
73/0 I/02
07 3 (0
+.40O
1.d SQ
0.1
.500
0.0 b
0.087
0.069
73/fl9/O’
‘ 7 45
.00j
0.1
5.400
0.280
0.005
0.082
73/10/03
07 4S
(.700
7.000
0.1
7.600
0.410
0.034
0.023
73/12/07
14 0)
0 i.000
5.100
0. -
lu.500
1. l Su
0.100
0.100
74/01/07
1015
4.4(10
3. 00
.2
5.500
0.870
0.3s1
0.171
74,2/04
07
20
3. 300
J.I OC
0.04
14.000
0.300
0.225
0.309
74/’J3/0
159,
‘. 0O
3.300
•o.
.000
u.2’- ’0
0.100
0.200
74 ,r 4,02
1215
4. lO
•4 Lj
0.04
5.100
u. 20
0.250
0.310
74/05/07
08 0’ )
4.400
3.300
.1.1
8.000
0. 1o
0.200
0.218
74/ Os/03
..100
.3. 00
(.1
N.10 0
0.300
0.270
0.160
74/01/03
CA 00
4.600
4.100
0.1
7.000
0.6 0
0.040
0.300
-------
STt t.T — T- Jt L .t.T . 7 ,/0j/31
. U21fl ’.t 1
3’ 02 , 1.u 0 1’ 27.0
LCt Tt,’
21 7 . — 1’C TUN
1/i E 1uC, L4r L
C— . - y L4 L
1 1c ’4L
‘4
‘O02Li00
21’. 12 0
0000 FEET uE1 Th
tI’ ’)
71
(j ) sC,
2E
0061 .
5u051
‘ 00 3
0AT
T1’E
)E, T_
?—(j,—T JT
.‘,-iU5—j1”,
‘“ ‘jtj3
TOT r Jr.L
.-lj—
FLU ’.
C( ’ LiuIT
o
O—T-iu
\ —I F L
t .
l)T L
,. 1t
FLLJ —MGD
T
rEtI
r /L
M O/C
4 (,/L
MU/L
INST MGL)
M0 r4LY
73,o i07
0 iC
3.100
2.100
0.1
7.000
0.58u
0.300
0.277
73/07/05
0600
i.’ 0
3.000
0. 3
.400
0.240
0.200
0.400
73,rM,02
0$ 00
4.1’ 7
1. 50
•J.1
.1o0
4. ’+00
0.28$
0.2 1 38
73/10/04
040’)
.100
3.300
0.1
9. . 00
2.500
0.14’.
0.144
73/10/31
013 30
5., I00
‘..‘Uu
0. ,
12.500
1.430
0.c 88
0.2 38
7311210$
013 30
3.400
2.1300
U.€’
$.i00
1.3130
0.302
0.2Mb
74/01/03
r - 3 l ’
j. ’ 00
2.So O
u.7
,. 00
1.440
0.320
74/02/07
0 30
‘.2 00
2.ru0
U.
11.000
1.320
0. $
0.320
74/03/07
0 05
‘.400
2.500
1’.’
7. 00
0. $3 0
0.? U
0.320
74,04/04
0 s 30
4.500
2.30 ’)
u.7
c ..000
0.? ’ (j
0.440
0.240
74/05/02
()M 3 l
4.000
2.700
u.i
10.000
0.450
U.i 20
0.2M0
76/06/013
013 15
4.71)0
3.150
0.2
9.300
0.9 o0
0.320
0.300
74/1” ./2
10 00
4. (i0
2.400
0.?
11.000
0. OS O
0.300
0.320
-------
STOPET T l L jAT (D u f!j
21o 71 TF2 1 0471 p002000
3 38 . O.0 0 8 08 ?S.0
A - 5 UN
21 L.LC It C MAP
T/’ tN1iJC
-------
STIJ—ET ETc 1Ev’ L ,,ATE 7s/r,j/ j
OU’-f’—
0’bf l
u)rj)
i)0e s
00610
mATE
T1’F 1 t t’n
0 TOT
PH }SD1S
N03
LiT JEL
N’iN
F ’j
01
0 1’iU
N—1 jFAL
N
TOTAL
TJ
3AY L T
i ,/L
MG/L
0/L
lG/L
0/L
73/05/07
11 On
C T—
t .2UO
5.200
4
1.100
0.135
73/0t3/07
I” 00
73/05/27
11 30
CP(T)—
b.bO0
5.700
1.260
0.072
73/05/27
15 3(1
13/10/01
11 00
CP(fl—
M. lfl O
0.230
4.
1.sO O
0.110
73/10/01
if’ 00
73/10/31
11 00
CPT—
7.t fl0
7.100
3.9
1.100
0.160
73/10/31
15 30
73/11/30
U 00
CPT—
3.300
2.R Ou
3.9
0. 30
0.0b7
73/11/30
16 00
74/01/28
1100
2.050
1.900
2.2
0.700
0.076
74/02/28
11 00
Cp(r)—
3.410
3.20o
(.0
1.000k
0.100
74/02/
if’ 00
14/03/25
11 01
CP(T—
i.450
3.100
5.1
I.Uou ’
0.072
74/03/25
16 00
74/04/29
11 00
CP(T) —
3.150
2. 0()
7.3
1.000w
0.1 0
74,04/29
1i’ Qi)
74 ,06/21
11 0’
C 1-(T ’—
. .000
d. - 00
.2
0.900
0.0 50 K
74/Os/27
If’ 00
74/07/25
11 00
CP(1)—
5.500
5.300
.d
1.000 ’c
0.1 0
74/07/25
16
K VALUE
KNOWN TO BE
INDICATED
LESS THAN
104 . A AS j0 ep. 1A -‘00730s
3o 05 10.0 087 45 ‘. .0
1 ACE C ’ L”
7 i5 LY
T/r t.’41uC.cY LA L
AvLkL
I IE ’-’ ALtS 2141204
4 0000 FEIT DEL iTri
,u O S I s0053
FL0 C(JNDUIT
FLO..—MGD
INST MGU MONIMLY
0.400 0.400
0.400 0.400
0 • 500
0.500
0.500 0.500
0.500 0.500
0.500
Q.,00
0.500 0.500
0.500
0.sOO 0.500
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1973
STATES OF
KENTUCKY AND TENNESSEE
-------
PE CtrT OF LAr(Ec riIGri .r VuLU S (NUM E O LAr E .I1r ‘IC hEr VALUES)
LA
-------
Lt L
flATA Ti t E SLu I i -A’ c1
LA’ T
CO)E
LAr’ E r 1 A..E
AEQIAN
tOTAL
r
M 5J1AN
INOi-(
N
;no—
MEAN ‘,EC
P AN
U1LOp A
15—
MIN DO
MEOIAN
L)LSS
21fl1
LA.F C’ - E-L .
(J.Olr’
G.3 O
4J?.3i 1
3.1i05
14.900
0.007
2102
Jt.Lr. ‘OLLO L OI
0. OIu
u.2Ri
j 0.00Q
3. Y4
14.800
0.005
1 i
ER-’1NG’’J
0.fl7
0.550
44 .6b7
1’e.90 8
14.900
u.0 7
2lo—
‘cE TUCrc L.Ar
tJ.01e
4 ’1. 72
.08 ’
12.600
0.030
2IflS
Ai REr 1Vt R S O1-
O.O 7
0.460
4 2.594
14.900
0.006
-------
:• ‘J L I’ - • ‘ .•‘ 1’
‘ELI ‘ 2 - ‘ - 4 t ’ . 1 -
CODE Li E NAVE TUT L - :LC C L — 1 - I
‘701 LANE A?KLt’ 3.12— J .. ‘ .7j.i i 12.7 i U . - .(j ( -.3—’
‘.70’. ‘ J0’ IE ESE’ V)i - 0.05? ‘ “.2.071 iI.’.lS 0.
470 C-ILATIIAM E E VOI ’ 0.1’ .- u. ’.6 ( - ‘+7j.o O O .160 . 0 0.0”-.
7O7 C’-iLROr ,EE LAKE 0.05 1 0.780 ‘ .4t .b6? 12.162 15.000 0.022
4708 C,I ICKAMAUt,4 LA’ E 0.031 Q, ’.40 463.b33 3.111 ‘ .60t) 0.012
4711 ‘)OIJGLAS LAcE 0.025 I .4 ’ .0 442.823 ‘ ..553 15.000 0.01’.
‘.712 FORT LOUOO’ 4 RESERVOIR 0.05’. 0 .SS0 465.571 ‘ ..776 12.600 O.02 ,
4713 GREAT FALLS L
-------
2E i L ’t T - . 1 - t,r? “ES *1 i ’•- -2 it ”
500
j N.) t. .
LAKE
CODE
L WE N E
TOTAL
P
1NO G
N
SEC
L) ’A
.i
iiSS
.
‘.701
LAKE APKLEY
13
2)
‘.0 C
)
13 C
2)
1
Il
1
11’
13
1
2i
4704
ROOP4E ESE V0I
‘.0 1
)
0 1
0)
73 1
11)
2 1
3 ’
- C
7)
3
‘
.ie
200
4706
C 4EATP-4A 4 RESER/OI .
7 (
1)
47 C
7i
7 1
1)
‘.0 C
t)
‘ .J (
ii ’
0
0)
191
4707
CHEROKFE LAKE
50
7)
7 (
1’
53 1
8)
13 C
2)
13 (
0)
‘.0
C
)
17b
4708
CHICKAMAUGA LAKE
67 1
10)
63 (
9)
33 ( 5)
93 (
14)
90 C
13)
70
(
10)
16
4711
DOUGLAS LAKE
73 1
11)
63 (
9)
67 C 10)
80 C
12)
13 C
0)
60
(
9)
356
4712
FORT LOUDON RESERVOIR
33 C
5)
20 1
3)
27 1 4)
73 11)
60 1 9)
27
‘.)
240
4713
GREAT FALLS LAKE
87 C
13)
73 C
11)
60 ( 9)
87 C 13)
40 6)
93
1
14)
440
4717
NICKAJACK RESERVOIR
50
33
5)
47 1 7)
100 ( 15)
80 1 12)
33
C
5)
343
4720
OLD HICKORY LAKE
20 C
3)
80 1
12)
20 ( 3)
33 1 5)
100 15)
53
1
8)
306
‘.722
WATTS BAR RESERVOIR
60 C
9)
27 (
4)
40
C 6)
67 1 10)
67 C 10)
70
C
10)
331
4723
J. PERCY PRIEST RESERVOL
27 C
4)
100 C
15)
80
( 12)
27
C 4)
13 ( 0)
47
1
7)
294
4724
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
80 C
12)
53 C
8)
100
( 15)
60
1 9)
33
C 5)
80
1
12)
406
‘.725
SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE
100 C
15)
13 (
2)
3
1 1’..)
47
7)
13
C 0)
87
C
13)
353
4727
REELFOOT LAKE
0 (
0)
‘13 C
14)
0
1 0)
0
C 0)
53
( 8)
7
1)
153
433
4728 WOODS RESERVOIR
93 1 14) 87 C 13)
87 C 13) 53 C 8) 13 C 0) 100 1 15)
------- |