U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY WORKING PAPER SERIES REPORT ON SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR HUNTERDON COUNTY NEW JERSEY EPA REGION II WORKING PAPER No, 374 CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS OREGON and ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 699-440 ------- REPORT ON SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR HUNTERDON COUNTY NEW JERSEY EPA REGION II WORKING PAPER No, 374 WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE NEW JERSEY NATIONAL GUARD MAY 1976 ------- 1 CONTENTS Page Foreword ii List of Study Lakes - State of New Jersey iv Lake and Drainage Area Map V Sections I. Conclusions II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5 IV. Nutrient Loadings V. Literature Reviewed 13 VI. Appendices 14 ------- ii FOREWORD The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation- wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and reservoirs. OBJECTIVES The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen- trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management practices relating to point source discharge reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water- sheds. ANALYTIC APPROACH The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that: a. A generalized representation or model relating sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed. b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters associated with lake degradation, the generalized model can be transformed into an operational representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients. c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the potential for eutrophication control can be made. LAKE ANALYSIS In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review [ g303(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. ------- iii Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine- ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for professional involvement and to the New Jersey National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey. Douglas Clark, Chief of the Bureau of Water Quality Planning and Management, Mr. Frank Takacs, New Jersey National Eutrophication Survey Coordinator, Principal Environmental Specialist, and Robert Kotch, Senior Environmental Engineer, provided Invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series. Major General William R. Sharp, Former Chief of Staff, Major General Wilfred G. Menard, Jr., Chief of Staff, and Project Officer Colonel Herbert D. Ruhlin, who directed the volunteer efforts of the New Jersey National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey. ------- iv NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY STUDY LAKES STATE OF NEW JERSEY LAKE NAME COUNTY Budd Lake Morris Duhernal Lake Middlesex Farrington Lake Middlesex Greenwood Lake Passaic, N.J.; Orange, N.Y. Lake Hopatcong Morris, Sussex Lake Musconetcong Morris, Sussex Oradell Reservoir Bergen Paulinskill Lake Sussex Pinecliff Lake Passaic Pompton Lakes Passaic Spruce Run Reservoir Hunterdon Union Lake Cumberland Wanaque Reservoir Passaic ------- ( 3 New Jersey Nap Location A nnanclol. SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR ® Tributary S&ipllng Site )< Lake Sampling Site . ) Drainage Area Boundary $I jn. I ------- SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR, NEW JERSEY STORET NO. 3420 I. CONCLUSIONS A. Trophic Condition: Based upon Survey data and field observations, Spruce Run Reservoir is considered eutrophic. The lake is characterized by high nutrient concentrations, seasonal algal blooms, and dissolved oxygen depression with hydrogen sulfide formation in the summer and fall. Chlorophyll a values ranged from 9.6 pg/i in the fall to a high of 23.6 pg/i in the summer, and mean Secchi disc visibility was 181.2 cm. B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient: Algal assay results indicate that Spruce Run Reservoir was limited by available phosphorus. Spikes with phosphorus, or phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously resulted in increased assay yields. Spikes with nitrogen alone did not stimulate a growth response. The mean total inorganic nitrogen to mean orthophosphorus ratio (N/P) in the spring lake data further indicates these results. ------- 2 C. Nutrient Controllability: 1. Point Sources - Point sources contributed 2.7% of the total phosphorus loading to Spruce Run Reservoir. The loading of 0.28 g/m 2 /yr is less than the “permissible” loading proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974). Total elimination of known point sources will not lower the loading from its present level. 2. Nonpoint Sources - The total phosphorus load from nonpoint sources accounted for 97.3% of the load reaching Spruce Run Reservoir. Major tributaries contributed 78.0% while minor tributaries and inuiediate drainage areas con- tributed 13.1% of the load. ------- 3 II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below. The lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the State of New Jersey. Tributary flow data were provided by the New Jersey District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by methods as áutlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is included as Appendix A. A. Lake Morphometry: 1. Surface area: 5.22 km 2 . 2. Mean depth: 7.9 meters. 3. Maximum depth: 22.2 meters. 4. Volume: 41.238 x 106 m 3 . 5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 296 days. ------- 4 B. Tributary and Outlet (see ppendix B for flow data): 1. Tributaries - Drainage Me n flow Name area(km’) ( mi/sec ) A(2) Spruce Run 40.1 0.57 B(l) Mulhockaway Stream 30.6 0.42 C(l) Unnamed Stream 7.1 0.11 D(l) Willoughby Brook 6.3 0.09 E(l) Black Brook 4.5 0.07 Minor tributaries and immediate drainage - 13.1 0.26 Totals 101.7 1.52 2. Outlet - A(l) Spruce Run 107.0 1.61 C. Precipitation: 1. Year of sampling: 154.1 cm. 2. Mean annual: 120.6 cm. ------- 5 III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY Spruce Run Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two stations on the lake and from one or more depths at each station (see map, page v). During each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each station for chlorophyll a analysis and phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the first visit, an 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were 19.8 meters at Station 1 and 10.4 meters at Station 2. For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175. The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and are summarized in III A for waters at the surface and at the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in III B. Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III C. ------- SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR STORET CODE 3’.20 PHYSICAL AND Ci-IEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS PARAMETER 4/18/73 MAX S’ ° • 2 DEPTH RANGE N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS) 7/22/73 MAX o 2 DEPTH RANGE N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS, 10/ 2/73 MAX = 2 DEPTH RANGE N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS) • N = NO. OF SAMPLES •° MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE 000 S = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE TEMPERATURE (DEG CENT) 0.—1.5 H DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTN 0 ° 2 10.8— 11.9 8.9— 9.5 11.3 9.2 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 4 2 25.8— 27.3 11.5— 13.6 26.5 12.5 0.0— 1.5 10.1— 19.8 4 2 1°. 20.3 12. — 14.5 20.0 13.7 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 DISSOLVED OXYGEN (MG/LI 0.—1.5 M DEPTH 0 MAX DEPTH•• 2 •“°•—0 ” 10.7— 11.3 •0•90 11.0 ‘“—‘ ‘ ° 9.8— 13.1 2 2 9.0— 9.1 0.2— 1.1 9.0 0.6 0.0— 0.0 10.1— 19.8 2 2 8.2— 8.8 0.0— 0.0 8.5 0.0 1.5— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS) 0.—I.5 M DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTH°• 2 130.— 130. 125.— 125. 130. 125. 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 4 2 135.— 141. 111.— 116. 138. 114. 0.0— 1.5 10.1— 19.8 4 2 270.— 300. 320.— 330. 280. 325. 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 0.—I.5 N DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTH 2 8.1— 8.2 7.6— 7.9 8.1 7.7 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 8.7— 8.7 6.6— 6.6 8.7 6.6 0.0— 0.0 13.1— 19.8 4 2 7.1— 7.7 6.5— 6.5 1.3 6.5 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/LI 0.—I.5 N DEPTH 2 MAX DtPTH° 2 26.— 28. 24.— 26. 27. 25. 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 32.— 33. 42.— 43. 33. 43. G.0— 0.0 10..1— 19.8 4 2 30.— 35. -43.— 48. 33. 46. 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 TOTAL P (MG/L) 0.—I.5 H DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTN°’ 2 0.015—0.020 0.021—0.023 0.017 0.022 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 0.019—0.025 0.014—0.020 0.022 0.017 0.)— 0.0 10..— 19.8 4 2 0.021—0.038 0.028—0.030 0.026 0.029 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/LI 0.—1.5 N DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTH’ 2 0.005—0.011 0.005—0.010 0.008 0.007 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 0.007—0.009 0.005—0.007 0.008 0.006 0.0 0.0 10.1— 19.8 4 2 0.008—0.009 0.012—0.012 0.009 0.012 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 N02 .NO3 (MG/LI 0.-l.5 N DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTI4°° 2 0.440—0.480 0.460—0.480 0.460 0.470 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 0.140—0.150 0.080—0.120 0.145 0.100 0.0— 0.0 10.1— 19.8 4 2 0.030—0.050 0.030—0.030 0.045 0.030 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 AMMONIA (MG/LI 0.— 1.5 N DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTH 2 0.030—0.030 0.030—0.040 0.030 0.035 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 0.060—0.080 0.460—0.650 0.010 0.555 0.0— 0.0 10.1— 19.8 4 2 0.060—0.060 0.920—1.240 0.060 1.080 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 KJELDAHL N (MG/LI 0.—1.5 H DEPTH 2 MAX DEPTH°O 2 0.200—0.200 0.200—0.200 0.200 0.200 0.0— 0.0 9.8— 13.1 2 2 1.000—1.800 0.600—1.200 1.400 0.900 0.0— 0.0 10.1— 19.. 4 2 0.700—1.000 1.600—2.000 0.850 3.800 0.0— 1.5 10.4— 12.2 SECCHI DISC (METERS) 2 1.5— 1.5 I.5 2 1.9— 2.3 2.1 2 1.8— 1.8 1.8 0 ------- 7 B. Biological Characteristics: 1. Phytoplankton - Al gal Sampling Dominant Units Date Genera per ml 04/18/73 1. Synedra 13,519 2. Asterionella 4,953 3. Melosira 1,869 4. Flagellates 1,775 5. Oscillatoria 997 Other genera 1,184 Total 24,297 07/22/73 1. Cyclotella 5,711 2. Flagellates 1,179 3. Coelosphaerium 471 4. Tetraedron 340 5. Rhizosolenia 262 Other genera 892 Total 8,855 10/02/73 1. Cyclotella 951 2. Flagellates 852 3. Melosira 416 4. Tetraedron 377 5. Scenedesmus 159 Other genera 317 Total 3,072 ------- 8 Station Number 1 2 1 2 1 2 Chlorophyll a pg/1) - 19.9 18.7 23.6 10.4 9.8 9.6 Maximum yield ( ma/l Lv wt. 1.3 12.1 16.5 0.7 2. Chlorophyll a - Sampi ing Date 04/18/ 73 07/22/73 10/02/73 C. Limi 1. ting Nutrient Study: Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked - Ortho P Inorganic N Spike(mg/1) Conc.(rna/fl Conc.(mci/fl ____ _____ Control 0.010 0.438 0.05 P 0.060 0.438 0.05 p + 1.0 N 0.060 1.438 1.00 N 0.010 1.438 2. Discussion—- The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastruni capricornutum , indicates that the potential for primary productivity in Spruce Run Reservoir was high at the time of sampling. The lake was phosphorus limited at that time as indicated by the increased growth of the assay alga in response to an addition of orthophosphorus. Spikes with phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously resulted in a maximum yield. An addition of nitrogen alone did not stimulate the growth beyond the control yield. The N/P ratio of 82/1 in the spring lake data further indicates phosphorus limitation. ------- 9 IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS (See Appendix D for data) For the determination of nutrient loadings, the New Jersey National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in July 1973, and was completed in June 1974. Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by the New Jersey District Office of USGS for the tributary sites nearest the lake. In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were determined by using a modification of the USGS computer program for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tributaries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any. Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS) were estimated by using the mean annual concentrations in Unnamed Stream at Station C(1), Willoughby Brook at Station D(l), and Black Brook at Station E(l) and mean annual ZZ flow. The operator of the Union Township School wastewater treatment plant provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. ------- 10 A. Waste Sources: 1. Known municipal - Population Mean Flow Receiving Name Served* Treatment* ( m 3 /d x 103) Water* Union 400 Activated 0.019 Mulhockaway Township Sludge Stream School 2. Known industrial - None B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year: 1. Inputs — % of Source kg P/yr total a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) - A(2) Spruce Run 650 44.7 B(1) Muihockaway Stream 295 20.3 C(l) Unnamed Stream 50 3.4 D(l) Willoughby Brook 70 4.8 E(l) Black Brook 70 4.8 b. Minor tributaries and immediate drainage (nonpoint load) - 190 13.1 c. Known municipal STP’s — Union Township School 40 2.7 d. Septic tanks** <1 <0.1 e. Known industrial - None f. Direct precipitation*** - 90 6.2 Totals 1,455 100.0 2. Output - A(l) Spruce Run 875 3. Net annual P accumulation - 580 *Treatment plant questionnaire. **Estjmate based on 1 lakeside residence. ***Estjmated (see NES Working Paper No. 175)) ------- 11 C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year: 1. Inputs - % of Source kg N/yr total a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) - A(2) Spruce Run 29,670 36.8 B(l) Muihockaway Stream 21,935 27.2 C(l) Unnamed Stream 5,820 7.2 D(1) Willoughby Brook 3,230 4.0 E(l) Black Brook 2,975 3.7 b. Minor tributaries and immediate drainage (nonpoint load) - 11,170 13.9 c. Known municipal STP’s - Union Township School 120 0.2 d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1 e. Known industrial - None f. Direct precipitation** - 5,635 7.0 Totals 80,565 100.0 2. Output - A(l) Spruce Run 57,815 3. Net annual N accumulation - 22,750 *Estjmate based on 1 lakeside residence. **Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175). ------- 12 D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area: Tributa ,y kg P/km 2 /y r kg N/jçm 2 /yr A(2) Spruce Run 16 740 B(1) Muihockaway Stream 10 717 C(l) Unnamed Stream 7 820 D(l) Willoughby Brook 11 513 E(l) Black Brook 16 661 E. Yearly Loads: In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” loading is one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his “permissible” loading is that which would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso- trophic loading would be considered one between “dangerous” and “permissible”. Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to water bodies with short hydraulic retention times. Total Yearly Phosphorus Loading (g/m 2 /yr) Estimated loading for Spruce Run Reservoir 0.28 Vollenweider’s “dangerous” or eutrophic loading 0.62 Vollenweider’s “permissible” or oligotrophic loading 0.31 ------- 13 V. LITERATURE REVIEWED U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada and Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Nati. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario. ------- VI. APPENDICES APPENDIX A CONVERSION FACTORS ------- CONVERSION FACTORS Hectares x 2.471 = acres Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles Meters x 3.281 = feet Cubic meters x 8.107 x lO = acre/feet Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile ------- APPENDIX B TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA ------- TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW JERSEY 06/04/76 LAKE CODE 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S0 1(M) 107.0 SUB-DRAINAGE NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS) TRIBUTARY AREA(S0 KM) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN 3420A1 107.0 0.74 1.22 1.76 2.24 1.87 2.01 1.95 1.59 2.44 2.04 0.59 0.88 1.61 3420A2 40.1 0.62 0.74 1.19 0.99 0.68 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.48 0.59 0.57 342081 30.6 0.45 0.54 0.85 0.74 0.48 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.42 0.42 3420C1 7.1 0.119 0.139 0.210 0.181 0.122 0.074 0.071 0.068 0.057 0.057 0.093 0.110 0.108 342001 6.3 0.099 0.116 0.187 0.156 0.108 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.042 0.042 0.071 0.093 0.090 3420E1 4.5 0.074 0.088 0.130 0.113 0.076 0.045 0.045 0.042 0.037 0.037 0.057 0.068 0.068 3420ZZ 18.3 0.28 0.34 0.54 0.45 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.27 0.26 SUMMARY TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE — 107.0 TOTAL FLOW IN — 18.23 SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 107.0 TOTAL FLOW OUT z 19.31 MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS) TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW 3420A 1 7 73 1.954 21 2.435 22 2.492 23 1.642 8 73 1.642 16 2.180 9 73 1.303 22 1.444 10 73 1.218 13 0.963 11 73 0.595 10 0.481 12 73 5.550 15 3.426 1 74 3.540 26 4.078 2 74 1.812 9 1.246 24 1.303 3 74 2.464 9 1.472 23 5.890 4 74 3.653 20 2.945 5 74 2.067 11 3.115 6 74 1.048 8 0.680 3420A2 7 73 0.821 21 5.154 23 0.850 8 73 0.765 16 0.680 9 73 0.269 22 0.210 10 73 0.481 13 0.221 11 73 0.481 10 0.396 12 73 1.982 15 1.472 1 74 1.331 26 1.331 2 74 0.850 9 0.736 24 0.906 3 74 1.104 9 1.246 23 1.416 4 74 1.614 20 1.614 5 76 0.878 11 1.104 6 74 0.566 8 0.396 ------- TRIBUTARy FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW JERSEY 06/04/16 LA$(E CODE 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAlI,! FLOWS(CNS) 7 73 0.623 8 73 0.538 9 73 0.207 10 73 3.200 i i 73 3.200 12 73 1.359 1 74 0.934 2 74 0.623 3 74 0.793 4 74 1.161 5 74 0.651 6 74 0.425 7 73 0.153 8 73 0.142 9 73 0.057 10 73 0.093 11 73 0.093 12 73 0.340 1 74 0.235 2 74 0.159 3 74 0.198 4 74 0.280 5 74 0.164 6 74 0.110 7 73 0.125 8 73 0.122 9 73 0.042 10 73 0.076 ii 73 0.016 12 73 0.311 I 74 0.210 2 74 0.133 3 74 0.176 4 74 0.255 5 74 0.139 6 74 0.091 7 73 0.096 8 73 0.088 9 73 0.037 10 73 0.059 II 73 0.059 12 73 0.212 1 74 0.147 2 74 0.099 3 74 0.125 4 74 0.176 5 74 0.102 6 74 0.068 21 3.908 16 0.510 22 0.164 13 0.173 10 0.311 15 1.019 26 0.934 9 0.538 9 0.906 20 1.133 11 0.793 8 0.311 21 0.906 16 0.130 22 0.045 13 0.048 10 0.082 15 0.255 26 0.232 9 0.136 9 0.221 20 0.278 11 0.198 8 0.079 21 0.821 16 0.108 22 0.034 13 0.034 10 0.062 15 0.232 26 0.210 9 0.1 )6 9 0.195 20 0.255 11 0.176 8 0.062 21 0.566 16 0.082 22 0.028 13 0.031 10 0.051 15 0.159 26 0.144 9 0.085 9 0.139 20 0.173 11 0.125 8 0.051 TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY 342081 3420C1 342001 3420E I FLOW DAY FLOW 23 0.623 24 0.651 23 0.991 23 0.159 24 0.164 23 0.246 23 0.133 24 0.144 23 0.224 23 0.0 24 0.102 23 0.156 ------- TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NIW JERSEY 06/04/76 LA (E CODE 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS) TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW 3420ZZ 7 73 0.368 21 2.350 8 73 0.340 16 0.311 9 73 0.122 22 0.096 10 73 0.221 13 0.102 11 73 0.221 10 0.181 12 73 0.906 15 0.680 1 74 0.595 26 0.595 2 74 0.396 9 0.340 3 74 0.510 9 0.566 4 74 0.736 20 0.736 5 74 0.396 11 0.510 6 74 0.258 8 0.181 DAY FLOW DAY FLOW 23 0.396 24 0.425 23 0.651 ------- APPENDIX C PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 342001 40 38 48.0 074 55 02.0 3 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 34019 NEW JERSEY 013392 11EPALES 2111202 0047 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671 DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 .NO3 PHOS—DIS FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P 73/04/18 09 25 0000 10.8 60 130 8.10 26 0.030 0.200K 0.440 0.011 09 25 0006 13.7 12.6 130 8.20 26 0.020 0.200 0.430 0.006 09 25 0015 10.5 11.9 130 8.10 26 0.020 0.200K 0.440 0.004 09 25 0022 9.8 11.6 130 8.00 26 0.020 0.200K 0.440 0.005 09 25 0030 9.1 11.1 130 7.90 26 0.030 0.200K 0.460 0.005 09 25 0043 8.9 10.7 125 7.60 26 0.040 0.200K 0.460 0.010 73/07/22 16 20 0000 26.2 9.0 92 138 8.70 33 0.060 1.800 0.150 0.009 16 20 0005 25.8 135 16 20 0010 25.0 132 16 20 0016 22.0 5.3 120 6.50 31 0.070 0.800 0.320 0.007 16 20 0020 19.0 113 16 20 0025 16.2 108 16 20 0030 14.9 108 16 20 0040 13.5 0.3 106 6.40 36 0.2j0 0.700 0 300 0.007 16 20 0050 12.2 101 16 20 0060 11.8 111 16 20 0065 11.5 0.2 111 ,.60 43 1.200 0.080 0.007 73/10/02 09 25 0000 19.9 72 300 7.70 3 0.0jO 0.900 0.040 0.009 09 25 0005 19.8 8.2 280 7.20 31 0.06 0.7O 0 ,030 0.003 09 25 0015 19.7 8.0 270 6.90 30 0.070 0.700 0.030 0.008 09 25 0033 14.5 0.2 310 6.30 43 0.730 1.400 0.040 0.009 09 25 0040 12.9 0.0 330 6.50 48 1.240 2.000 0.030 0.012 K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 342001 40 38 48.0 074 55 02.0 3 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 34019 NEW JERSEY 013392 1 1EPALES 2111202 0047 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00665 32217 DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL FROM OF A TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L 73/04/18 09 25 0000 0.015 19.9 09 25 0006 0.013 09 25 0015 0.015 09 25 0022 0.018 09 25 0030 0.018 09 25 0043 0.023 73/07/22 16 20 0000 0.025 23.6 16 20 0016 0.027 16 20 0040 0.012 16 20 0065 0.014 73/10/02 09 25 0000 0.025 9.8 09 25 0005 0.021 09 25 0015 0.020 09 25 0033 0.022 09 25 0040 0.030 ------- STORET R R1EVAL DATE 71/06/06 342002 40 39 41.0 076 55 21.0 3 SPRUCE RUN RESEP VOI1 34010 Et1 JERSE 1 IEPALES 2111202 0036 EET DEPTH CLASS 00 00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00672 DATE TINE DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY P11 T ‘ 1K ‘1113—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PIlOS—DIS FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N—TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES HICROMNO SU MG/I HG/L rlG/L MG/L MG/L P 73/04/17 10 05 0000 11.9 60 130 8.20 28 0.030 0.200 0.480 0.005 10 05 0006 12.0 12.5 130 8.30 28 0.030 0.200K 0.480 0.005 10 05 0015 10.9 12.5 125 8.20 26 0.020 0.500 0.460 0.005 10 05 0022 10.3 11.9 130 8.10 25 0.020 0.200K 0.470 0.004 10 05 0032 9.5 11.3 125 7.90 24 0.030 0.200K 0.480 0.005 73/07/22 17 00 0000 27.3 9.1 74 141 8.70 32 0.080 1.000 0.140 0.007 17 00 0005 26.8 138 17 00 0010 25.3 136 17 00 0015 22.6 6.1 129 6.90 31 0.030 0.800 0.400 0.007 17 00 0020 17.6 3.9 115 6.50 34 0.160 0.300 0.380 0.006 17 00 0025 15.4 113 17 00 0030 14.1 115 17 00 0033 13.6 1.1 116 6. 0 42 0.460 0.500 0.120 0.00$ 73/10/02 09 55 0000 25.3 70 280 7.40 35 0.360 1.000 0.050 0.009 09 55 0085 20.2 8.8 270 7.10 35 0.060 0.80W) 0.050 0.009 09 55 0015 19.8 7.6 280 6.90 35 0.090 0.700 0.060 0.000 09 55 0025 13 2 1.4 350 6.50 42 0.423 0.900 0.040 0.008 09 55 0034 14 S 0.0 320 6. 50 43 0.920 2.600 0 330 0.012 596 5 32217 DATE TI E DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL F( OH OF A TO OAF FEET MG/I P UG/L 73/04/Il 10 05 0000 0.020 18.7 10 05 0006 0.019 10 05 0015 0.018 10 05 0022 0.018 10 05 0032 0.021 73/07/22 17 00 0000 0.019 10.4 17 00 0015 0.027 17 00 0020 0.019 17 00 0033 0.020 73/10/02 09 55 0000 0.027 9.6 09 55 0005 0.038 09 55 0015 0.023 09 55 0025 0.029 09 55 334 0.023 K WALUE KNO1N TO liE LESS ThAN INDICAIED ------- APPENDIX D TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DATA ------- ST0F’ ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 34 20 A I 40 38 44.0 074 54 52.0 Si RUCE RUN 34 7.5 :1 GH BRID”E 0/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 3J92 S END GAGE WEIR 0.2 M! W OF ST H Y 31 I 1EPALES 21 1204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 73/07/22 10 30 0.550 1.540 0.610 0.0!B ‘).020 73/C /:6 21 0 0.086 0.670 0.252 0. O5K 0.015 3/09/22 15 10 0.093 0.440 0.092 0.005K 0.015 73/1)i13 11 45 0.088 0.420 0.048 0.006 0.020 73/11/10 10 55 0.23 0.575 3.063 0.005K 73/12/15 11 40 0.200 0.500 0.094 0.008 0.020 74/01/26 14 40 0.510 0.200 0.040 0 0 005K 0.0 05K 74/02/09 H 00 3.520 O.2O 0.020 0.005 0.013 74/02/24 15 55 0.510 0.700 0.010 0.005K 0.025 7’ /03/)9 :6 2) 0.460 0.300 0.015 0.005 0.030 74/03/23 4 00 0.450 1.200 0.035 0.005K 0.025 74/04/2C 33 15 0.443 10500 0.060 0.005 0.010 741)5;:! 14 00 0.315 1.000 0.055 0.015 0.020 74/06/09 11 00 0.252 1.730 0.095 0.010 0.O IS K V? LUE Kt’IOWN TO BE LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 3420A2 40 40 27.0 074 55 02.0 4 SPRUCE RUN 34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE I/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392 2NDRY RD BRDG 0.1 MI W OF ST HWY 31 I1EPALES 2111204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS P1105—TOT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P MG/L P 73/07/21 15 55 0.710 1.760 0.520 0.033 73/08/16 20 35 0.650 0.220 0.150 0.023 0.045 73/09/2 14 30 0.800 0.210 0.029 0.038 0.045 73/10/13 10 30 0.399 0.260 0.017 0.030 0.040 73/11/10 10 30 0.860 o.iootc 0.021 0.022 0.055 73/12/15 10 30 0.850 0.400 0.028 0.012 0.035 74/01/26 11 1.180 2.100 0.100 0.010 74/02/09 11 30 1.340 0.300 0.025 0.020 0.020 74/02/24 14 35 1.060 0.700 0.020 0.015 0.045 14/03/09 15 00 0.930 0.300 0.015 0.010 0.040 74/03/23 11 40 1.010 0.500 0.030 0.015 0.025 74/04/20 11 55 0.740 2.200 0.065 0.010 0.020 74/05/11 11 15 0.560 0.900 0.080 0.010 0.025 74/06/08 13 13 0.910 0.200 0.045 0.041 0.045 K VALUE PcNOWN TO E LESS THAN INDICATE ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 342081 40 38 50.0 074 58 10.0 4 MULHOCKWAY CREEK 34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE T/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392 CO HWY 26 BROG 0.8 MI N OF PERRYVILLE I IEPALES 2111204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS Pi-iOS-TOT FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L HG/L HG/L MG/L. P HG/L P 73/07/21 15 15 0.570 1.800 0.770 0.033 73/08/16 22 00 0.890 0.830 0.360 0.020 0.050 73/09/22 13 45 1.160 0.230 0.037 0.017 0.040 73/10/13 14 00 0.920 0.180 0.008 0.011 0.011 73/11/10 09 45 1.140 0.100K 0.014 0.015 0.020 73/12/15 09 30 1.010 0.200 0.020 0.008 0.015 74/01/26 11 00 1.180 0.800 0.040 0.015 0.015 74/02/09 15 00 1.500 0.300 0.015 0.005 0.005 74/02/24 13 45 1.200 0.600 0.010 0.010 0.030 74/03/09 14 00 0.920 0.400 0.017 0.007 0.030 74/03/23 10 45 1.000 0.300 0.020 0.010 0.020 74/04/20 11 00 0.820 0.800 0.040 0.010 74/05/11 10 20 0.630 0.800 0.090 0.010 0.020 74/06/08 11 15 1.000 0.300 0.030 0.020 0.025 K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 3’.20C1 40 39 05.0 074 58 13.0 4 UNNAMED STREAM 34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE 1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392 2NORY RD 3R0G 1.1 MI N OF PERRYVILLE 1 1EPALES 2111204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 73/07/23 15 30 0.430 2.800 1.470 0.017 73/08/16 20 10 0.500 2.520 0.540 0.011 0.020 73/09/22 14 05 0.710 1.380 0.600 0.011 0.020 73/10/13 10 iS 0.450 0.210 0.010 0.008 0.008 73/11/10 09 55 0.610 0.100K 0.020 0.010 0.010 73/12/15 09 50 0.650 0.100 0.020 0.005K 0.010 74/01/26 11 20 0,756 2.200 0.070 0.010 0.010 74/02/09 13 30 0.930 0.100K 0.015 0.005 0.005 74/02/24 13 55 0.810 0.900 0.030 0.005 0.015 74/03/09 14 15 0.650 0.700 0.025 0.005 0.025 74/03/23 11 05 0.630 0.600 0.030 0.005 0.017 74/04/20 11 15 0.520 1.000 0.025 0.010 0.125 74/05/11 10 35 0.450 0.300 0.025 0.010 0.015 74/06/08 11 30 0.730 1.200 0.045 0.010 0.010 K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 342001 40 40 18.0 074 54 56.0 4 WILLOUGHBY BROOK 34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE 1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392 NJ HWY 31 BRDG 1 MI N OF MARIANNES CORNE 11EPALES 2111204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT tcJEL NM3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 73/07/23 16 15 0.086 2.360 0.021 73/OB/16 20 45 C.260 1.900 0.950 0.022 0.045 73/09/22 14 40 0.310 0.240 0.042 0.012 0.025 73/10/13 11 00 0.056 0.270 0.017 0.006 0.006 73/11/10 10 40 0.300 0.350 0.024 0.010 0.010 73/12/15 10 40 0.570 0.200 0.016 0.005K 0.005 74/01/26 13 10 0.630 0.900 0.030 0.005 0.005 74/02/09 09 30 0.750 0.100 0.010 0.005K 0.005 74/02/2’. 14 55 0.460 0.600 0.020 0.005K 0.015 74/03/09 15 15 0.460 0.300 0.030 0.005 0.030 74/03/23 13 10 0.570 0.500 0.015 0.005 0.015 74/04/20 12 30 0.276 0.300 0.010 0.005K 0.005K 74/05/11 11 40 0.260 1.000 0.020 0.050 0.130 74/06/08 43 40 0.460 0.900 0.030 0.011 0.020 K VALUE KNOWN TO dE LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 3420E1 40 .39 34.0 074 56 52.0 4 BLACK 8ROO 34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE T/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392 2tJDRY RD GROG 1.3 MI ENE OF VAN SYCKEL I 1EPALES 2111204 0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 73/07/21 15 40 0.780 3.300 0.180 0.066 73/08/16 20 20 0.270 1.000 0.290 0.025 0.055 73/09/22 14 20 0.600 1.050 0.670 0.017 0.025 73/10/13 10 20 0.280 0.540 0.021 0.014 0.015 73/11/10 10 15 0.350 0.500 0.063 0.014 0.035 74/01/26 11 35 0.480 0.100 0.015 0.005 0.015 74/02/09 12 00 0.600 0.100K 0.015 0.010 0.020 74/02/24 14 15 0.590 0.700 0.035 0.015 0.025 74/03/09 14 35 0.460 0.500 0.030 0.010 0.040 74/03/23 11 15 0.350 1.000 0.055 0.005 0.045 74/04/20 11 ?5 0.252 1.700 0.055 0.005 0.015 74/05/11 10 55 0.200 0.900 0.035 0.030 0.040 74/06/08 11 55 0.450 0.500 0.020 0.015 0.055 K VALUE KNOWN TO L3E LESS THAN INDICATED ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04 34208A AS342OBA 40 37 50.0 074 38 13.0 4 UNION TOWNSrIIP SCHOOL 34 7.5 HIGH th’ IDGL 1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR MULHOCOWAY STREI M 1 1EPALES 0000 FEET DEPTH P000071 013391 2141204 CLASS 00 00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053 DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONuUIT FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTPIO RATE FLOW—MGD TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST M6D MONTHLY 73/1 /04 10 00 3C.000 1.850 0.890 6.900 7.150 0.005 0.005 74/01/16 10 00 b.300 16,000 1.360 2.100 7,350 0.005 0.005 74/02/20 10 00 3.200 11.000 3.520 3.700 0.005 0.005 74/03/14 10 00 3.200 13.000 0.180 6.600 0.005 0.005 74/04/10 09 30 lt ,.000 3.900 1.950 4.600 4.900 0.005 0.005 74/05/14 10 30 8.000 1.000K 0.150 .900 5.900 0.005 0.005 74/07/17 09 00 45.500 1.000K 0.175 3.100 12.600 74/09/17 09 15 23.000 0.600 0.025K 7.500 7.600 0.005 0.005 74/10/17 10 00 7.800 1.000K 0.045 4.040 4.040 0.005 0.005 74/11/14 74/12/11 09 09 30 45 7.800 16.800 1.000K 1.000K 0.050K 0.110 5.150 7.500 5.150 7.500 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 75/01/22 09 30 0.400 3.000 0.0 80K 0.190 9.500 0.OOS 0.005 75/02/18 08 00 3.680 1.200 0.110 1.550 1.600 0.005 0.005 K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN INDICATED ------- APPENDIX E PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES SAMPLED BY NES IN 1973 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN iS- MEDIAN CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC C 4LORA MIN DO O ISS O T -iO P 3402 UDD LAKE 0.082 0.205 474.000 48.500 7.’.00 0.012 3403 GREENwOOD LAKE 0.021 0.100 414.250 IL.92 0 14.800 0.007 3406 (Jp ADELL RESERVOIR 0.055 0.990 462.500 22.267 13.600 0. OOd 3409 PINECLIFF LAKE 0.070 0.175 465.500 38.960 11.000 0.011 3410 POMPTON LAKES 0.071 0.795 463.167 23.033 11.800 0.02’ 3412 DUHERNAL LAKE 0.082 1.420 466.667 6.800 8.600 0.010 3413 FARRINGTON LAKE 0.055 0.770 462.000 8.283 14.4(.0 0.012 3415 LAKE HOPATCONG 0.022 0.120 416.333 13.627 14.900 0.007 3417 LAKE MUSCONETCONG 0.036 0.140 436.000 11.067 6,000 0.010 3419 PAtJLINS KILL LAKE 0.133 0.950 460.500 7.017 9.000 0.065 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 0.020 0.470 428.667 15.333 15.000 0.007 3422 UNION LAKE 0.063 1.150 463.200 22.080 12.800 0.018 3423 WANAOUE RESERVOIR 0.014 0.120 355.333 7.111 14.800 0.005 ------- PERCENT OF LAKES WIT i HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGMEM VALUES) MEOLAN INUEX MIN DO DISS ORTHO P NO 2 ( 3) 191 83 ( 9) 437 67 ( 8) 2’.7 42 ( 5) 234 8 ( 1) 174 58 ( 7) 261 29 ( 3) 283 83 ( 9) 386 50 6) 426 0 ( 0) 250 83 ( 9) 342 17 1 2) 175 LAKE CODE LAKE NAME MEDIAN TOTAL P MEDIAN INORG N 500— MEAN SEC MEAN CHLORA 15- 3402 BUDO LAKE 12 ( 1) 58 1 7) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 92 1 11) 3403 GREENwOOD LAKE 83 ( 10) 100 ( 12) 92 1 11) 58 1 7) 2) ( 2) 3406 ORA [ ELL RESERVOIR 54 ( 6) 17 ( 2) 42 C 5) 2S 1 3) 2 ( 5) 3409 PINECLIFF LAKE 33 ( 4) 67 C 8) 17 ( 2) 8 ( 1) 67 ( 8) 3410 POP4PTON LAKES 25 1 3) 33 1 4) 33 1 4) 17 ( 2) 58 1 7) 3412 DUMERNAL LAKE 12 C 1) 0 ( 0) 8 1) 100 1 12) 83 I 10) 3413 FARRINGTON LAKE 54 1 6) 42 C 5) 50 ( 6) 75 1 9) 33 1 4) 3415 LAKE HOPATCONG 75 C 9) 87 ( 10) 83 C 10) 50 ( 6) 8 ( 1) 3417 LAKE MUSCUNETCONG 67 ( 8) 75 ( 9) 67 ( 8) 67 ( 8) 100 1 12) 3419 PAULINS KILL LAKE 0 1 0) 25 1 3) 58 ( 7) 92 C 11) 75 ( 9) 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 92 ( 11) 50 ( 6) 75 ( 9) 42 C 5) 0 I 0) 3422 UNION LAKE 42 I 5) 8 ( 1) 25 C 3) 33 1 4) 50 1 6) 3423 WANAQUE RESERVOIR 100 C 12) 87 1 10) 100 1 12) 83 1 10) 21 1 2) 100 1 12) 491 ------- LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS. RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO 1 3423 WANAQUE RESERVOIR 491 2 3403 GREENIIOOD LAKE 437 3 3417 LAKE MUSCONETCONG 426 4 3415 LAKE NOPATCONG 386 5 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 342 6 3413 FARRINGTON LAKE 283 7 3412 OUHERNAL LAKE 261 8 3419 PAULINS KILL LAKE 250 9 3406 ORADELL RESERVOIR 247 10 3409 PINECLIFF LAKE 234 11 3402 BUDO LAKE 191 12 3422 UNION LAKE 175 13 3410 POMPTON LAKES 174 ------- |