U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
HUNTERDON COUNTY
NEW JERSEY
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 374
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
HUNTERDON COUNTY
NEW JERSEY
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 374
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AND THE
NEW JERSEY NATIONAL GUARD
MAY 1976
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Study Lakes - State of New Jersey iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map V
Sections
I. Conclusions
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[ g303(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection for professional involvement and to the
New Jersey National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Douglas Clark, Chief of the Bureau of Water Quality Planning
and Management, Mr. Frank Takacs, New Jersey National Eutrophication
Survey Coordinator, Principal Environmental Specialist, and
Robert Kotch, Senior Environmental Engineer, provided Invaluable
lake documentation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the
preliminary reports, and provided critiques most useful in the
preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General William R. Sharp, Former Chief of Staff, Major
General Wilfred G. Menard, Jr., Chief of Staff, and Project Officer
Colonel Herbert D. Ruhlin, who directed the volunteer efforts of
the New Jersey National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Budd Lake Morris
Duhernal Lake Middlesex
Farrington Lake Middlesex
Greenwood Lake Passaic, N.J.;
Orange, N.Y.
Lake Hopatcong Morris, Sussex
Lake Musconetcong Morris, Sussex
Oradell Reservoir Bergen
Paulinskill Lake Sussex
Pinecliff Lake Passaic
Pompton Lakes Passaic
Spruce Run Reservoir Hunterdon
Union Lake Cumberland
Wanaque Reservoir Passaic
-------
( 3 New Jersey
Nap Location
A nnanclol.
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
® Tributary S&ipllng Site
)< Lake Sampling Site
. ) Drainage Area Boundary
$I jn.
I
-------
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR, NEW JERSEY
STORET NO. 3420
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Based upon Survey data and field observations,
Spruce Run Reservoir is considered eutrophic. The
lake is characterized by high nutrient concentrations,
seasonal algal blooms, and dissolved oxygen depression
with hydrogen sulfide formation in the summer and fall.
Chlorophyll a values ranged from 9.6 pg/i in the fall
to a high of 23.6 pg/i in the summer, and mean Secchi
disc visibility was 181.2 cm.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Spruce Run
Reservoir was limited by available phosphorus. Spikes
with phosphorus, or phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously
resulted in increased assay yields. Spikes with nitrogen
alone did not stimulate a growth response. The mean total
inorganic nitrogen to mean orthophosphorus ratio (N/P) in
the spring lake data further indicates these results.
-------
2
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point Sources -
Point sources contributed 2.7% of the total
phosphorus loading to Spruce Run Reservoir. The
loading of 0.28 g/m 2 /yr is less than the “permissible”
loading proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and
Dillon, 1974). Total elimination of known point
sources will not lower the loading from its present
level.
2. Nonpoint Sources -
The total phosphorus load from nonpoint sources
accounted for 97.3% of the load reaching Spruce Run
Reservoir. Major tributaries contributed 78.0% while
minor tributaries and inuiediate drainage areas con-
tributed 13.1% of the load.
-------
3
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized
below. The lake surface area and mean depth were provided
by the State of New Jersey. Tributary flow data were
provided by the New Jersey District Office of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes
the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic retention time was
obtained by dividing the lake volume by the mean flow of
the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by methods
as áutlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working
Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is
included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 5.22 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 7.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 22.2 meters.
4. Volume: 41.238 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 296 days.
-------
4
B. Tributary and Outlet (see ppendix B for flow data):
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Me n flow
Name area(km’) ( mi/sec )
A(2) Spruce Run 40.1 0.57
B(l) Mulhockaway Stream 30.6 0.42
C(l) Unnamed Stream 7.1 0.11
D(l) Willoughby Brook 6.3 0.09
E(l) Black Brook 4.5 0.07
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 13.1 0.26
Totals 101.7 1.52
2. Outlet - A(l) Spruce Run 107.0 1.61
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 154.1 cm.
2. Mean annual: 120.6 cm.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Spruce Run Reservoir was sampled three times during
the open-water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped
Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical
parameters were collected from two stations on the lake and
from one or more depths at each station (see map, page v).
During each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected
from each station for chlorophyll a analysis and phytoplankton
identification and enumeration. During the first visit, an
18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal
assays. Maximum depths sampled were 19.8 meters at Station 1
and 10.4 meters at Station 2. For a more detailed explanation
of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in III A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton
counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in III B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III C.
-------
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 3’.20
PHYSICAL AND Ci-IEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER
4/18/73
MAX
S’ ° • 2 DEPTH
RANGE
N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
7/22/73
MAX
o 2 DEPTH
RANGE
N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS,
10/ 2/73
MAX
= 2 DEPTH
RANGE
N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
• N = NO. OF SAMPLES
•° MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
000 S = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
TEMPERATURE (DEG CENT)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTN 0 ° 2
10.8— 11.9
8.9— 9.5
11.3
9.2
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
4
2
25.8— 27.3
11.5— 13.6
26.5
12.5
0.0— 1.5
10.1— 19.8
4
2
1°. 20.3
12. — 14.5
20.0
13.7
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (MG/LI
0.—1.5 M DEPTH 0
MAX DEPTH•• 2
•“°•—0 ”
10.7— 11.3
•0•90
11.0
‘“—‘ ‘ °
9.8— 13.1
2
2
9.0— 9.1
0.2— 1.1
9.0
0.6
0.0— 0.0
10.1— 19.8
2
2
8.2— 8.8
0.0— 0.0
8.5
0.0
1.5— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS)
0.—I.5 M DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTH°• 2
130.— 130.
125.— 125.
130.
125.
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
4
2
135.— 141.
111.— 116.
138.
114.
0.0— 1.5
10.1— 19.8
4
2
270.— 300.
320.— 330.
280.
325.
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
0.—I.5 N DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTH 2
8.1— 8.2
7.6— 7.9
8.1
7.7
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
8.7— 8.7
6.6— 6.6
8.7
6.6
0.0— 0.0
13.1— 19.8
4
2
7.1— 7.7
6.5— 6.5
1.3
6.5
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/LI
0.—I.5 N DEPTH 2
MAX DtPTH° 2
26.— 28.
24.— 26.
27.
25.
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
32.— 33.
42.— 43.
33.
43.
G.0— 0.0
10..1— 19.8
4
2
30.— 35.
-43.— 48.
33.
46.
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.—I.5 H DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTN°’ 2
0.015—0.020
0.021—0.023
0.017
0.022
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
0.019—0.025
0.014—0.020
0.022
0.017
0.)— 0.0
10..— 19.8
4
2
0.021—0.038
0.028—0.030
0.026
0.029
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/LI
0.—1.5 N DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTH’ 2
0.005—0.011
0.005—0.010
0.008
0.007
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
0.007—0.009
0.005—0.007
0.008
0.006
0.0 0.0
10.1— 19.8
4
2
0.008—0.009
0.012—0.012
0.009
0.012
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
N02 .NO3 (MG/LI
0.-l.5 N DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTI4°° 2
0.440—0.480
0.460—0.480
0.460
0.470
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
0.140—0.150
0.080—0.120
0.145
0.100
0.0— 0.0
10.1— 19.8
4
2
0.030—0.050
0.030—0.030
0.045
0.030
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
AMMONIA (MG/LI
0.— 1.5 N DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTH 2
0.030—0.030
0.030—0.040
0.030
0.035
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
0.060—0.080
0.460—0.650
0.010
0.555
0.0— 0.0
10.1— 19.8
4
2
0.060—0.060
0.920—1.240
0.060
1.080
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
KJELDAHL N (MG/LI
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 2
MAX DEPTH°O 2
0.200—0.200
0.200—0.200
0.200
0.200
0.0— 0.0
9.8— 13.1
2
2
1.000—1.800
0.600—1.200
1.400
0.900
0.0— 0.0
10.1— 19..
4
2
0.700—1.000
1.600—2.000
0.850
3.800
0.0— 1.5
10.4— 12.2
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
2
1.5— 1.5
I.5
2
1.9— 2.3
2.1
2
1.8— 1.8
1.8
0
-------
7
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Al gal
Sampling Dominant Units
Date Genera per ml
04/18/73 1. Synedra 13,519
2. Asterionella 4,953
3. Melosira 1,869
4. Flagellates 1,775
5. Oscillatoria 997
Other genera 1,184
Total 24,297
07/22/73 1. Cyclotella 5,711
2. Flagellates 1,179
3. Coelosphaerium 471
4. Tetraedron 340
5. Rhizosolenia 262
Other genera 892
Total 8,855
10/02/73 1. Cyclotella 951
2. Flagellates 852
3. Melosira 416
4. Tetraedron 377
5. Scenedesmus 159
Other genera 317
Total 3,072
-------
8
Station
Number
1
2
1
2
1
2
Chlorophyll a
pg/1) -
19.9
18.7
23.6
10.4
9.8
9.6
Maximum yield
( ma/l Lv wt.
1.3
12.1
16.5
0.7
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampi ing
Date
04/18/ 73
07/22/73
10/02/73
C. Limi
1.
ting Nutrient Study:
Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N
Spike(mg/1) Conc.(rna/fl Conc.(mci/fl ____ _____
Control 0.010 0.438
0.05 P 0.060 0.438
0.05 p + 1.0 N 0.060 1.438
1.00 N 0.010 1.438
2. Discussion—-
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastruni
capricornutum , indicates that the potential for primary
productivity in Spruce Run Reservoir was high at the
time of sampling. The lake was phosphorus limited at
that time as indicated by the increased growth of the
assay alga in response to an addition of orthophosphorus.
Spikes with phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously resulted
in a maximum yield. An addition of nitrogen alone did not
stimulate the growth beyond the control yield.
The N/P ratio of 82/1 in the spring lake data further
indicates phosphorus limitation.
-------
9
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the New
Jersey National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab
samples from each of the tributary sites indicated on the
map (page v), except for the high runoff months of February
and March when two samples were collected. Sampling was
begun in July 1973, and was completed in June 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates
for the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year
were provided by the New Jersey District Office of USGS for
the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries
were determined by using a modification of the USGS computer
program for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads
indicated for tributaries are those measured minus known
point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and
immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS) were estimated by using
the mean annual concentrations in Unnamed Stream at Station C(1),
Willoughby Brook at Station D(l), and Black Brook at Station E(l)
and mean annual ZZ flow.
The operator of the Union Township School wastewater treatment
plant provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow
data.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Population Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served* Treatment* ( m 3 /d x 103) Water*
Union 400 Activated 0.019 Mulhockaway
Township Sludge Stream
School
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs —
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A(2) Spruce Run 650 44.7
B(1) Muihockaway Stream 295 20.3
C(l) Unnamed Stream 50 3.4
D(l) Willoughby Brook 70 4.8
E(l) Black Brook 70 4.8
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 190 13.1
c. Known municipal STP’s —
Union Township School 40 2.7
d. Septic tanks** <1 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation*** - 90 6.2
Totals 1,455 100.0
2. Output - A(l) Spruce Run 875
3. Net annual P accumulation - 580
*Treatment plant questionnaire.
**Estjmate based on 1 lakeside residence.
***Estjmated (see NES Working Paper No. 175))
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A(2) Spruce Run 29,670 36.8
B(l) Muihockaway Stream 21,935 27.2
C(l) Unnamed Stream 5,820 7.2
D(1) Willoughby Brook 3,230 4.0
E(l) Black Brook 2,975 3.7
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 11,170 13.9
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Union Township School 120 0.2
d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 5,635 7.0
Totals 80,565 100.0
2. Output - A(l) Spruce Run 57,815
3. Net annual N accumulation - 22,750
*Estjmate based on 1 lakeside residence.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
12
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributa ,y kg P/km 2 /y r kg N/jçm 2 /yr
A(2) Spruce Run 16 740
B(1) Muihockaway Stream 10 717
C(l) Unnamed Stream 7 820
D(l) Willoughby Brook 11 513
E(l) Black Brook 16 661
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his “permissible” loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between “dangerous”
and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m 2 /yr)
Estimated loading for Spruce Run Reservoir 0.28
Vollenweider’s “dangerous” or eutrophic loading 0.62
Vollenweider’s “permissible” or oligotrophic loading 0.31
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National
Eutrophication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working
Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada and Corvallis
Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Nati. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x lO = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW JERSEY 06/04/76
LAKE CODE 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S0 1(M) 107.0
SUB-DRAINAGE NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY AREA(S0 KM) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
3420A1 107.0 0.74 1.22 1.76 2.24 1.87 2.01 1.95 1.59 2.44 2.04 0.59 0.88 1.61
3420A2 40.1 0.62 0.74 1.19 0.99 0.68 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.48 0.59 0.57
342081 30.6 0.45 0.54 0.85 0.74 0.48 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.42 0.42
3420C1 7.1 0.119 0.139 0.210 0.181 0.122 0.074 0.071 0.068 0.057 0.057 0.093 0.110 0.108
342001 6.3 0.099 0.116 0.187 0.156 0.108 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.042 0.042 0.071 0.093 0.090
3420E1 4.5 0.074 0.088 0.130 0.113 0.076 0.045 0.045 0.042 0.037 0.037 0.057 0.068 0.068
3420ZZ 18.3 0.28 0.34 0.54 0.45 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.27 0.26
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE — 107.0 TOTAL FLOW IN — 18.23
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 107.0 TOTAL FLOW OUT z 19.31
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
3420A 1 7 73 1.954 21 2.435 22 2.492 23 1.642
8 73 1.642 16 2.180
9 73 1.303 22 1.444
10 73 1.218 13 0.963
11 73 0.595 10 0.481
12 73 5.550 15 3.426
1 74 3.540 26 4.078
2 74 1.812 9 1.246 24 1.303
3 74 2.464 9 1.472 23 5.890
4 74 3.653 20 2.945
5 74 2.067 11 3.115
6 74 1.048 8 0.680
3420A2 7 73 0.821 21 5.154 23 0.850
8 73 0.765 16 0.680
9 73 0.269 22 0.210
10 73 0.481 13 0.221
11 73 0.481 10 0.396
12 73 1.982 15 1.472
1 74 1.331 26 1.331
2 74 0.850 9 0.736 24 0.906
3 74 1.104 9 1.246 23 1.416
4 74 1.614 20 1.614
5 76 0.878 11 1.104
6 74 0.566 8 0.396
-------
TRIBUTARy FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW JERSEY
06/04/16
LA$(E CODE 3420
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAlI,! FLOWS(CNS)
7 73 0.623
8 73 0.538
9 73 0.207
10 73 3.200
i i 73 3.200
12 73 1.359
1 74 0.934
2 74 0.623
3 74 0.793
4 74 1.161
5 74 0.651
6 74 0.425
7 73 0.153
8 73 0.142
9 73 0.057
10 73 0.093
11 73 0.093
12 73 0.340
1 74 0.235
2 74 0.159
3 74 0.198
4 74 0.280
5 74 0.164
6 74 0.110
7 73 0.125
8 73 0.122
9 73 0.042
10 73 0.076
ii 73 0.016
12 73 0.311
I 74 0.210
2 74 0.133
3 74 0.176
4 74 0.255
5 74 0.139
6 74 0.091
7 73 0.096
8 73 0.088
9 73 0.037
10 73 0.059
II 73 0.059
12 73 0.212
1 74 0.147
2 74 0.099
3 74 0.125
4 74 0.176
5 74 0.102
6 74 0.068
21 3.908
16 0.510
22 0.164
13 0.173
10 0.311
15 1.019
26 0.934
9 0.538
9 0.906
20 1.133
11 0.793
8 0.311
21 0.906
16 0.130
22 0.045
13 0.048
10 0.082
15 0.255
26 0.232
9 0.136
9 0.221
20 0.278
11 0.198
8 0.079
21 0.821
16 0.108
22 0.034
13 0.034
10 0.062
15 0.232
26 0.210
9 0.1 )6
9 0.195
20 0.255
11 0.176
8 0.062
21 0.566
16 0.082
22 0.028
13 0.031
10 0.051
15 0.159
26 0.144
9 0.085
9 0.139
20 0.173
11 0.125
8 0.051
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
342081
3420C1
342001
3420E I
FLOW DAY FLOW
23 0.623
24 0.651
23 0.991
23 0.159
24 0.164
23 0.246
23 0.133
24 0.144
23 0.224
23 0.0
24 0.102
23 0.156
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NIW JERSEY 06/04/76
LA (E CODE 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW
3420ZZ 7 73 0.368 21 2.350
8 73 0.340 16 0.311
9 73 0.122 22 0.096
10 73 0.221 13 0.102
11 73 0.221 10 0.181
12 73 0.906 15 0.680
1 74 0.595 26 0.595
2 74 0.396 9 0.340
3 74 0.510 9 0.566
4 74 0.736 20 0.736
5 74 0.396 11 0.510
6 74 0.258 8 0.181
DAY
FLOW DAY FLOW
23
0.396
24
0.425
23
0.651
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
342001
40 38 48.0 074 55 02.0 3
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
34019 NEW JERSEY
013392
11EPALES 2111202
0047 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 .NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/04/18 09 25 0000 10.8 60 130 8.10 26 0.030 0.200K 0.440 0.011
09 25 0006 13.7 12.6 130 8.20 26 0.020 0.200 0.430 0.006
09 25 0015 10.5 11.9 130 8.10 26 0.020 0.200K 0.440 0.004
09 25 0022 9.8 11.6 130 8.00 26 0.020 0.200K 0.440 0.005
09 25 0030 9.1 11.1 130 7.90 26 0.030 0.200K 0.460 0.005
09 25 0043 8.9 10.7 125 7.60 26 0.040 0.200K 0.460 0.010
73/07/22 16 20 0000 26.2 9.0 92 138 8.70 33 0.060 1.800 0.150 0.009
16 20 0005 25.8 135
16 20 0010 25.0 132
16 20 0016 22.0 5.3 120 6.50 31 0.070 0.800 0.320 0.007
16 20 0020 19.0 113
16 20 0025 16.2 108
16 20 0030 14.9 108
16 20 0040 13.5 0.3 106 6.40 36 0.2j0 0.700 0 300 0.007
16 20 0050 12.2 101
16 20 0060 11.8 111
16 20 0065 11.5 0.2 111 ,.60 43 1.200 0.080 0.007
73/10/02 09 25 0000 19.9 72 300 7.70 3 0.0jO 0.900 0.040 0.009
09 25 0005 19.8 8.2 280 7.20 31 0.06 0.7O 0 ,030 0.003
09 25 0015 19.7 8.0 270 6.90 30 0.070 0.700 0.030 0.008
09 25 0033 14.5 0.2 310 6.30 43 0.730 1.400 0.040 0.009
09 25 0040 12.9 0.0 330 6.50 48 1.240 2.000 0.030 0.012
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
342001
40 38 48.0 074 55 02.0 3
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
34019 NEW JERSEY
013392
1 1EPALES 2111202
0047 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/04/18 09 25 0000 0.015 19.9
09 25 0006 0.013
09 25 0015 0.015
09 25 0022 0.018
09 25 0030 0.018
09 25 0043 0.023
73/07/22 16 20 0000 0.025 23.6
16 20 0016 0.027
16 20 0040 0.012
16 20 0065 0.014
73/10/02 09 25 0000 0.025 9.8
09 25 0005 0.021
09 25 0015 0.020
09 25 0033 0.022
09 25 0040 0.030
-------
STORET R R1EVAL DATE 71/06/06
342002
40 39 41.0 076 55 21.0 3
SPRUCE RUN RESEP VOI1
34010 Et1 JERSE
1 IEPALES 2111202
0036 EET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00672
DATE TINE DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY P11 T ‘ 1K ‘1113—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PIlOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES HICROMNO SU MG/I HG/L rlG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/04/17 10 05 0000 11.9 60 130 8.20 28 0.030 0.200 0.480 0.005
10 05 0006 12.0 12.5 130 8.30 28 0.030 0.200K 0.480 0.005
10 05 0015 10.9 12.5 125 8.20 26 0.020 0.500 0.460 0.005
10 05 0022 10.3 11.9 130 8.10 25 0.020 0.200K 0.470 0.004
10 05 0032 9.5 11.3 125 7.90 24 0.030 0.200K 0.480 0.005
73/07/22 17 00 0000 27.3 9.1 74 141 8.70 32 0.080 1.000 0.140 0.007
17 00 0005 26.8 138
17 00 0010 25.3 136
17 00 0015 22.6 6.1 129 6.90 31 0.030 0.800 0.400 0.007
17 00 0020 17.6 3.9 115 6.50 34 0.160 0.300 0.380 0.006
17 00 0025 15.4 113
17 00 0030 14.1 115
17 00 0033 13.6 1.1 116 6. 0 42 0.460 0.500 0.120 0.00$
73/10/02 09 55 0000 25.3 70 280 7.40 35 0.360 1.000 0.050 0.009
09 55 0085 20.2 8.8 270 7.10 35 0.060 0.80W) 0.050 0.009
09 55 0015 19.8 7.6 280 6.90 35 0.090 0.700 0.060 0.000
09 55 0025 13 2 1.4 350 6.50 42 0.423 0.900 0.040 0.008
09 55 0034 14 S 0.0 320 6. 50 43 0.920 2.600 0 330 0.012
596 5 32217
DATE TI E DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
F( OH OF A
TO OAF FEET MG/I P UG/L
73/04/Il 10 05 0000 0.020 18.7
10 05 0006 0.019
10 05 0015 0.018
10 05 0022 0.018
10 05 0032 0.021
73/07/22 17 00 0000 0.019 10.4
17 00 0015 0.027
17 00 0020 0.019
17 00 0033 0.020
73/10/02 09 55 0000 0.027 9.6
09 55 0005 0.038
09 55 0015 0.023
09 55 0025 0.029
09 55 334 0.023
K WALUE KNO1N TO liE
LESS ThAN INDICAIED
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
ST0F’ ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
34 20 A I
40 38 44.0 074 54 52.0
Si RUCE RUN
34 7.5 :1 GH BRID”E
0/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 3J92
S END GAGE WEIR 0.2 M! W OF ST H Y 31
I 1EPALES 21 1204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/07/22 10 30 0.550 1.540 0.610 0.0!B ‘).020
73/C /:6 21 0 0.086 0.670 0.252 0. O5K 0.015
3/09/22 15 10 0.093 0.440 0.092 0.005K 0.015
73/1)i13 11 45 0.088 0.420 0.048 0.006 0.020
73/11/10 10 55 0.23 0.575 3.063 0.005K
73/12/15 11 40 0.200 0.500 0.094 0.008 0.020
74/01/26 14 40 0.510 0.200 0.040 0 0 005K 0.0 05K
74/02/09 H 00 3.520 O.2O 0.020 0.005 0.013
74/02/24 15 55 0.510 0.700 0.010 0.005K 0.025
7’ /03/)9 :6 2) 0.460 0.300 0.015 0.005 0.030
74/03/23 4 00 0.450 1.200 0.035 0.005K 0.025
74/04/2C 33 15 0.443 10500 0.060 0.005 0.010
741)5;:! 14 00 0.315 1.000 0.055 0.015 0.020
74/06/09 11 00 0.252 1.730 0.095 0.010 0.O IS
K V? LUE Kt’IOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
3420A2
40 40 27.0 074 55 02.0 4
SPRUCE RUN
34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE
I/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392
2NDRY RD BRDG 0.1 MI W OF ST HWY 31
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS P1105—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P MG/L P
73/07/21 15 55 0.710 1.760 0.520 0.033
73/08/16 20 35 0.650 0.220 0.150 0.023 0.045
73/09/2 14 30 0.800 0.210 0.029 0.038 0.045
73/10/13 10 30 0.399 0.260 0.017 0.030 0.040
73/11/10 10 30 0.860 o.iootc 0.021 0.022 0.055
73/12/15 10 30 0.850 0.400 0.028 0.012 0.035
74/01/26 11 1.180 2.100 0.100 0.010
74/02/09 11 30 1.340 0.300 0.025 0.020 0.020
74/02/24 14 35 1.060 0.700 0.020 0.015 0.045
14/03/09 15 00 0.930 0.300 0.015 0.010 0.040
74/03/23 11 40 1.010 0.500 0.030 0.015 0.025
74/04/20 11 55 0.740 2.200 0.065 0.010 0.020
74/05/11 11 15 0.560 0.900 0.080 0.010 0.025
74/06/08 13 13 0.910 0.200 0.045 0.041 0.045
K VALUE PcNOWN TO E
LESS THAN INDICATE
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
342081
40 38 50.0 074 58 10.0 4
MULHOCKWAY CREEK
34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE
T/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392
CO HWY 26 BROG 0.8 MI N OF PERRYVILLE
I IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS Pi-iOS-TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L HG/L HG/L MG/L. P HG/L P
73/07/21 15 15 0.570 1.800 0.770 0.033
73/08/16 22 00 0.890 0.830 0.360 0.020 0.050
73/09/22 13 45 1.160 0.230 0.037 0.017 0.040
73/10/13 14 00 0.920 0.180 0.008 0.011 0.011
73/11/10 09 45 1.140 0.100K 0.014 0.015 0.020
73/12/15 09 30 1.010 0.200 0.020 0.008 0.015
74/01/26 11 00 1.180 0.800 0.040 0.015 0.015
74/02/09 15 00 1.500 0.300 0.015 0.005 0.005
74/02/24 13 45 1.200 0.600 0.010 0.010 0.030
74/03/09 14 00 0.920 0.400 0.017 0.007 0.030
74/03/23 10 45 1.000 0.300 0.020 0.010 0.020
74/04/20 11 00 0.820 0.800 0.040 0.010
74/05/11 10 20 0.630 0.800 0.090 0.010 0.020
74/06/08 11 15 1.000 0.300 0.030 0.020 0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
3’.20C1
40 39 05.0 074 58 13.0 4
UNNAMED STREAM
34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE
1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392
2NORY RD 3R0G 1.1 MI N OF PERRYVILLE
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/07/23 15 30 0.430 2.800 1.470 0.017
73/08/16 20 10 0.500 2.520 0.540 0.011 0.020
73/09/22 14 05 0.710 1.380 0.600 0.011 0.020
73/10/13 10 iS 0.450 0.210 0.010 0.008 0.008
73/11/10 09 55 0.610 0.100K 0.020 0.010 0.010
73/12/15 09 50 0.650 0.100 0.020 0.005K 0.010
74/01/26 11 20 0,756 2.200 0.070 0.010 0.010
74/02/09 13 30 0.930 0.100K 0.015 0.005 0.005
74/02/24 13 55 0.810 0.900 0.030 0.005 0.015
74/03/09 14 15 0.650 0.700 0.025 0.005 0.025
74/03/23 11 05 0.630 0.600 0.030 0.005 0.017
74/04/20 11 15 0.520 1.000 0.025 0.010 0.125
74/05/11 10 35 0.450 0.300 0.025 0.010 0.015
74/06/08 11 30 0.730 1.200 0.045 0.010 0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
342001
40 40 18.0 074 54 56.0 4
WILLOUGHBY BROOK
34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE
1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392
NJ HWY 31 BRDG 1 MI N OF MARIANNES CORNE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT tcJEL NM3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/07/23 16 15 0.086 2.360 0.021
73/OB/16 20 45 C.260 1.900 0.950 0.022 0.045
73/09/22 14 40 0.310 0.240 0.042 0.012 0.025
73/10/13 11 00 0.056 0.270 0.017 0.006 0.006
73/11/10 10 40 0.300 0.350 0.024 0.010 0.010
73/12/15 10 40 0.570 0.200 0.016 0.005K 0.005
74/01/26 13 10 0.630 0.900 0.030 0.005 0.005
74/02/09 09 30 0.750 0.100 0.010 0.005K 0.005
74/02/2’. 14 55 0.460 0.600 0.020 0.005K 0.015
74/03/09 15 15 0.460 0.300 0.030 0.005 0.030
74/03/23 13 10 0.570 0.500 0.015 0.005 0.015
74/04/20 12 30 0.276 0.300 0.010 0.005K 0.005K
74/05/11 11 40 0.260 1.000 0.020 0.050 0.130
74/06/08 43 40 0.460 0.900 0.030 0.011 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO dE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
3420E1
40 .39 34.0 074 56 52.0 4
BLACK 8ROO
34 7.5 HIGH BRIDGE
T/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 013392
2tJDRY RD GROG 1.3 MI ENE OF VAN SYCKEL
I 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/07/21 15 40 0.780 3.300 0.180 0.066
73/08/16 20 20 0.270 1.000 0.290 0.025 0.055
73/09/22 14 20 0.600 1.050 0.670 0.017 0.025
73/10/13 10 20 0.280 0.540 0.021 0.014 0.015
73/11/10 10 15 0.350 0.500 0.063 0.014 0.035
74/01/26 11 35 0.480 0.100 0.015 0.005 0.015
74/02/09 12 00 0.600 0.100K 0.015 0.010 0.020
74/02/24 14 15 0.590 0.700 0.035 0.015 0.025
74/03/09 14 35 0.460 0.500 0.030 0.010 0.040
74/03/23 11 15 0.350 1.000 0.055 0.005 0.045
74/04/20 11 ?5 0.252 1.700 0.055 0.005 0.015
74/05/11 10 55 0.200 0.900 0.035 0.030 0.040
74/06/08 11 55 0.450 0.500 0.020 0.015 0.055
K VALUE KNOWN TO L3E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/04
34208A AS342OBA
40 37 50.0 074 38 13.0 4
UNION TOWNSrIIP SCHOOL
34 7.5 HIGH th’ IDGL
1/SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
MULHOCOWAY STREI M
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
P000071
013391
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONuUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTPIO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
M(,/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST M6D
MONTHLY
73/1 /04
10
00
3C.000
1.850
0.890
6.900
7.150
0.005
0.005
74/01/16
10
00
b.300
16,000
1.360
2.100
7,350
0.005
0.005
74/02/20
10
00
3.200
11.000
3.520
3.700
0.005
0.005
74/03/14
10
00
3.200
13.000
0.180
6.600
0.005
0.005
74/04/10
09
30
lt ,.000
3.900
1.950
4.600
4.900
0.005
0.005
74/05/14
10
30
8.000
1.000K
0.150
.900
5.900
0.005
0.005
74/07/17
09
00
45.500
1.000K
0.175
3.100
12.600
74/09/17
09
15
23.000
0.600
0.025K
7.500
7.600
0.005
0.005
74/10/17
10
00
7.800
1.000K
0.045
4.040
4.040
0.005
0.005
74/11/14
74/12/11
09
09
30
45
7.800
16.800
1.000K
1.000K
0.050K
0.110
5.150
7.500
5.150
7.500
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
75/01/22
09
30
0.400
3.000
0.0 80K
0.190
9.500
0.OOS
0.005
75/02/18
08
00
3.680
1.200
0.110
1.550
1.600
0.005
0.005
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1973
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN iS- MEDIAN
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INORG N MEAN SEC C 4LORA MIN DO O ISS O T -iO P
3402 UDD LAKE 0.082 0.205 474.000 48.500 7.’.00 0.012
3403 GREENwOOD LAKE 0.021 0.100 414.250 IL.92 0 14.800 0.007
3406 (Jp ADELL RESERVOIR 0.055 0.990 462.500 22.267 13.600 0. OOd
3409 PINECLIFF LAKE 0.070 0.175 465.500 38.960 11.000 0.011
3410 POMPTON LAKES 0.071 0.795 463.167 23.033 11.800 0.02’
3412 DUHERNAL LAKE 0.082 1.420 466.667 6.800 8.600 0.010
3413 FARRINGTON LAKE 0.055 0.770 462.000 8.283 14.4(.0 0.012
3415 LAKE HOPATCONG 0.022 0.120 416.333 13.627 14.900 0.007
3417 LAKE MUSCONETCONG 0.036 0.140 436.000 11.067 6,000 0.010
3419 PAtJLINS KILL LAKE 0.133 0.950 460.500 7.017 9.000 0.065
3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 0.020 0.470 428.667 15.333 15.000 0.007
3422 UNION LAKE 0.063 1.150 463.200 22.080 12.800 0.018
3423 WANAOUE RESERVOIR 0.014 0.120 355.333 7.111 14.800 0.005
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WIT i HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGMEM VALUES)
MEOLAN INUEX
MIN DO DISS ORTHO P NO
2 ( 3) 191
83 ( 9) 437
67 ( 8) 2’.7
42 ( 5) 234
8 ( 1) 174
58 ( 7) 261
29 ( 3) 283
83 ( 9) 386
50 6) 426
0 ( 0) 250
83 ( 9) 342
17 1 2) 175
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
MEDIAN
INORG
N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CHLORA
15-
3402
BUDO LAKE
12 (
1)
58 1
7)
0 (
0)
0 (
0)
92 1 11)
3403
GREENwOOD LAKE
83 (
10)
100 (
12)
92 1
11)
58 1
7)
2) ( 2)
3406
ORA [ ELL RESERVOIR
54 (
6)
17 (
2)
42 C
5)
2S 1
3)
2 ( 5)
3409
PINECLIFF LAKE
33 (
4)
67 C
8)
17 (
2)
8 (
1)
67 ( 8)
3410
POP4PTON LAKES
25 1
3)
33 1
4)
33 1
4)
17 (
2)
58 1 7)
3412
DUMERNAL LAKE
12 C
1)
0 (
0)
8 1)
100 1
12)
83 I 10)
3413
FARRINGTON LAKE
54 1
6)
42 C
5)
50 ( 6)
75 1
9)
33 1 4)
3415
LAKE HOPATCONG
75 C
9)
87 (
10)
83 C 10)
50 (
6)
8 ( 1)
3417
LAKE MUSCUNETCONG
67 (
8)
75 (
9)
67 ( 8)
67 (
8)
100 1 12)
3419
PAULINS KILL LAKE
0 1
0)
25 1
3)
58 ( 7)
92 C
11)
75 ( 9)
3420
SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR
92 (
11)
50 (
6)
75 ( 9)
42 C
5)
0 I 0)
3422
UNION LAKE
42 I
5)
8 (
1)
25 C 3)
33 1
4)
50 1 6)
3423 WANAQUE RESERVOIR
100 C 12) 87 1 10) 100 1 12) 83 1 10) 21 1 2) 100 1 12)
491
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 3423 WANAQUE RESERVOIR 491
2 3403 GREENIIOOD LAKE 437
3 3417 LAKE MUSCONETCONG 426
4 3415 LAKE NOPATCONG 386
5 3420 SPRUCE RUN RESERVOIR 342
6 3413 FARRINGTON LAKE 283
7 3412 OUHERNAL LAKE 261
8 3419 PAULINS KILL LAKE 250
9 3406 ORADELL RESERVOIR 247
10 3409 PINECLIFF LAKE 234
11 3402 BUDO LAKE 191
12 3422 UNION LAKE 175
13 3410 POMPTON LAKES 174
------- |