U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                    WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                           REPORT
                                             ON
                                         LAKE WYLIE
                                   YORK COUNIY, SOUTH CAROLINAj
                                 GASTON AND r€C$JENBlJRG COUNTIES,
                                        NORTH CAROLINA
                                        EPA REGION IV
                                     WORKING PAPER No, 441
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS OREGON
                             and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
 699-440

-------
                                  REPORT
                                    ON
                                LAKEWYLIE
                       YORK COUNTY,  SOUTH CAROLINA;
                     GASTON AND Ecftt&IBURG COUNTIES,
                              NORTH CAROLINA
                              EPA REGION IV
                          WORKING PAPER No,
       WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
         ENVIRONNENTAL CONTROL
               AND THE
     SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
               JUNE, 1975

-------
1
CONT ENTS
Foreword ii
List of South Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v, vi
Sections
i. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 10
v. Literature Reviewed 18
vi. Appendices 19

-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration corrinitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey 1 s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophicatiOn control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSI
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [ 3O3(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [ 3O3(c’ ], clean lakes [ 3l4(a ,b)] ,
and water quality monitoring [ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
AC KNO WL EDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental Control for professional involvement,
to the South Carolina National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those South Carolina waste-
water treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent
samples and flow data.
The staff of the South Carolina Bureau of Wastewater and
Stream Quality Control provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports,
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Robert L. McCrady, the Adjutant General of South
Carolina, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John P. DuPre (Retired),
who directed the volunteer efforts of the South Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.

-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
NAME COUNTY
Clark Hill Abbeville, McCor-
mick, SC; Colum-
bia, Elbert, Lin-
coln, McDuffie,
Wilks, GA
Fishing Creek Chester, Lancaster
Greenwood Greenwood, Laurens,
Newberry
Hartwell Anderson, Oconee,
Pickeris, SC;
Franklin, Hart,
Stephens, GA
Keowee Oconee, Pickens
Marion Berkeley, Calhoun,
Claredon, Orange-
burg, Sumter
Moultrie Berkeley
Murray Lexington, Newberry,
Richiand, Saluda
Robinson Chesterfield, Dar-
1 ington
Saluda Greenville, Pickens
Secession Abbeville, Anderson
Wateree Fairfield, Kershaw,
Lancaster
William C. Bowen Spartanburg
Wylie York, SC; Gaston,
Mecklenburg, NC

-------
LAKE
WYLIE
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
0 4
Scale

-------
vi
- ----- -
__ NORTH CAROL
SOUTH
Tributary Samnling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
,Sewage Treatment Facility
?Direct Drainage Area Boundary

-------
LAKE WYLIE
STORET NO. ’ 451l
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Lake Wylie is eutrophic. It ranked
eighth in overall t’rophic quality whèn the 13 South Carolina
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six parameters*. Six of the lakes had less median total phos-
phorus, nine had less and one had the same median dissolved
phosphorus, seven had less median inorganic nitrogen, four
had less mean chlorophyll a, and eight had greater mean Secchi
disc transparency. Marked depres ion ofdissolved oxygen with
depth occurred at stations 1, 2, and 3’in July.
Survey limnologists did not observe any nuisance conditions
during sampling visits.
B. Rate—Limiting Nutrien1 :
The algal assay r ’esults are not representative of conditions
in the lake because of a significant change in nutrients in the
sample from the time of collectionth the beginning of the assay.
However, the lake data indicate ph’osphorus limitation at all sam-
pling times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The phosphorus contributions Ot listed
* See Appendix A.

-------
2
point sources amounted to 39.5% of the total load reaching Lake
Wylie during the sampling year. The two Gastonia, NC, plants
collectively contributed 18.6%; Belmont, NC, 8.4%; Kings Mountain,
NC, 5.1%; and the remaining ten plants collectively contributed
7.3% of the total load.
The total phosphorus loading of 8.38 g/m 2 measured during
the sampling year is over five times that proposed by Vollen-
weider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading
(see page 17). Even complete removal of phosphorus at the listed
point sources would still leave a loading of about 5 g/n1 2 /yr. How-
ever, there are additional point sources beyond the 40-kilometer
limit of the Survey* that contribute significantly to the phos-
phorus load as indicated by the high export rates of some of
the tributaries (see page 16).
Six additional North Carolina municipal wastewater treatment
plants discharge in the upper portion of the South Fork Catawba
River and contribute to the high export rate of that stream.
These include Conover (S.W. plant), Hickory (S.E. plant), Lin-
colnton, Longview, Maiden, and Newton with a combined population
equivalence of 25,250 (Anonymous, 1971). Also, six unsanipled
point sources with a combined design flow of 2,270 m 3 /day dis-
charge to Paw Creek (Taylor, 1976) and contribute to the very
high phosphorus export rate of that stream.
* See Working Paper No. 175, ‘. . .Survey Methods, 1973-1976”.

-------
3
Many municipal point sources also discharge to the Catawba
River upstream from Lake Wylie. However, these sources probably
contribute minimal amounts of phosphorus indirectly to Lake Wylie
because of nutrient entrapment in the intervening reservoirs. For
example, five communities contributed about 9% of the total phos—
phorus load to Lake Norman* during the sampling year. However,
almost 68% of that phosphorus was retained in Lake Norman, and
24% of the phosphorus leaving that lake was retained in Mountain
Island Lake** (see map, page vi). Such entrapment is believed to
account for the low phosphorus export rate of the Catawba River at
station B-l (12 kg/km 2 /yr).
As noted before, even if complete removal of phosphorus could
be accomplished at the listed point sources, the remaining loading
would still be about three times the eutrophic loading. However,
considering all of the point sources impacting Lake Wylie and the
persistent phosphorus limitation of primary productivity in the
lake, it is likely that a high degree of phosphorus control at all
point sources would result in an improvement in the trophic condition
of Lake Wylie, particularly if a significant portion of the “non-
point” phosphorus load discussed below proves to be controllable.
The reduction of point—source phosphorus loads probably would
benefit downstream Fishing Creek Reservoir*** as well.
* Working Paper No. 387.
** Working Paper No. 386.
*** Working Paper No. 430.

-------
4
2. Non-point sources--It is calculated that non-point sources
contributed about 60% of the total phosphorus load to Lake Wylie
during the sampling year. However, the high phosphorus export
rates of the South Fork Catawba River (106 kg/km 2 ), Catawba Creek
(142 kg/km 2 ), and Paw Creek (301 kg/km 2 ) indicate that phosphorus
loads from unaccounted-for point sources and/or urban drainage
significantly impacted those streams during the sampling year.
Assuming that the mean of the phosphorus export rates of the
Catawba River, Beaverdam Creek, Allison Creek, and Little Allison
Creek is a typical non-point export rate for the Lake Wylie drain-
age (i.e., 18 kg P/kni 2 /yr; see page 16), it is calculated that
point and/or urban sources contributed an additional 144,275 kg P
to the South Fork Catawba River and 8,670 kg P to Catawba Creek,
and the six unsampled point sources contributed 9,960 kg P to Paw
Creek. The addition of these apparent point-source loads to those
listed herein would increase the point-source proportion of the
total load from about 40% to 76%.

-------
Name
Catawba Ri ver
S. Fk. Catawba River
Catawba Creek
Crowders Creek
Beaverdam Creek
Paw Creek
Allison Creek
Little Allison Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
C. Prec
1.
2.
2. Outlet —
Catawba River
I pitation***:
Year of sampling: 124.6 centimeters.
Mean annual: iii.o centimeters.
7,821 .8**
110.19
t Table of metric conversions--Appendix B.
tt Mast, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, “. ..Survey Methods,
1973—1976”.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICSt
A. Lake Morphometrytt:
1. Surface area: 53.10 kilometers 2 .
2. Mean depth: 7.0 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 28.4 meters.
4. Volume: 371.672 x 106 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 39 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage
area (km 2 j*
5,309.5
1,639.5
69.9
282.3
49.2
35.2
113.7
27.2
242.2
7,768.7
Mean flow
( m 3 /sec)*
76.47
22.55
0.95
3.84
0.67
0.47
1 . 54
0.37
3.33
110.19

-------
6
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Wylie was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
a number of depths at four stations on the lake (see map, page
v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9—liter depth-integrated sample was composited
for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was
collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 18.0 meters at station 1, 11.6
meters at station 2, 11.3 meters at station 3, and 5.8 meters at
station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.

-------
A.
SUMMARY
01
PPIYSICAL AND CHEMICAL
CHARACTE (ISTICS
ION
LAKE WYLIE
STORET
CODE 4511
151
SAMPLING ( 3/28/73)
2ND SAMPLING I 7/12/73) 3RD SAMPLiNG ( 9/20/73)
3 SITES 3 SITES 3 SITES
PARAMETER
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
RANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
NANGE
MEAN
MEDIAN
TEMP IC)
12.2
— 18.3
13.4
13.2
24.4
— 32.5
28.1
28.3
24.9
— 28.9
26.8
26.8
DISS 0*Y (MG/LI
8.5
— 9.7
9.3
9.2
0.2
— 8.6
4.1
4.2
3.4
— 6.8
5.5
5.6
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
65.
— 90.
70.
70.
61.
— 110.
78.
74.
70.
— 105.
79.
73.
PH (STAND UNITS)
6.8
— 7.5
7.4
7.5
6.4
— 8.3
6.8
6.6
6.3
— 6.5
6.5
6.5
TOT ALK (MG/U
11.
— 16.
14.
14.
18.
— 28.
21.
20.
11.
— 16.
13.
13.
TOT P (MG/LI
0.043
— 0.120
0.063
0.058
0.020
— 0.067
0.038
0.033
0.022
— 0.045
0.031
0.032
ORTHO P (MG/LI
0.013
— 0.051
0.021
0.017
0.003
— 0.014
0.006
0.006
0.009
— 0.022
0.013
0.012
N02.N03 (MG/LI
0.300
— 0.440
0.344
0.340
0.070
— 0.290
0.165
0.150
0.040
— 0.130
0.074
0.050
AMMONIA (MG/LI
0.080
— 0.170
0.106
.110
0.090
— 0.450
0.209
0.160
0.060
— 0.190
0.099
0.100
KJEL N (MG/LI
0.200
— 0.500
0.312
0.300
0.200
— 1.700
0.513
0.300
0.400
— 0.700
0.582
0.600
INOR(., N (MG/L)
0.380
— 0.610
0.449
0.450
0. 180
— 0.740
0.375
0.310
0.110
— 0.260
0.173
0.150
TOTAL N (MG/U
0.500
— 0.860
0.655
0.640
0.300
— 1.790
0.679
0.500
0.4S0
— 0.750
0.655
0.650
CHLRPYL A (UG/LI
2.S
— 9.3
5.3
4.0
5.7
— 6.2
5.9
5.7
4.7
— 5.7
5.1
5.0
SECCHI (M 1EPS)
0.3
— 0.6
0.4
0.4
0.9
— 1.4
1.2
1.3
1.2
— 1.4
1.3
1.2
—I

-------
8
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling Dominant Algal Units
Date Genera per ml
03/28/73 1. Flagellates 1,332
2. Melosira j. 679
3. Synedra 366
4. Cyclotella a. 314
5. Dactyloccopsis 131
Other genera 339
Total 3,161
07/12/73 1. Melosira p. 1,254
2. Cyclotella p. 874
3. Cryptomonas 2.• 608
4. Flagellates 608
5. Dinoflagellates 266
Other genera 1,027
Total 4,637
09/20/73 1. Anabaena 132
2. Centric diatoms 119
3. Cryptomonas . p. 105
4. Scenedesmus p_. 92
5. Chlorella 79
Other genera 474
Total 1 ,001
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( pg/i )
03/28/73 1 2.5
2 9.3
3 4.0
4 -
07/12/73 1 5.7
2 6.2
3 5.7
4 3.3
09/20/73 1 4.7
2 5.0
3 5.7
4 3.2

-------
9
Limiting Nutrient Study:
The algal assay results are not considered representative of
conditions in the lake because of a 60% loss of phosphorus in the
sample between the time of collection and the beginning of the
assay. The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sam-
pling times; i.e., mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios
were 15/1 or greater, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.

-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the South Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the
high runoff month of January when two samples were collected. Sampling
was begun in February, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were provided by
the South Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled “minor tributaries and immediate
drainage” (“ZZ” of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads
at station H-i, in kg/km 2 /year, and multiplying by the ZZ area in km 2 .
The operators of the Belmont, Cramerton, Gastonia #1, Kings Mt.,
McAdenville, Mt. Holly Industrial, Ranlo, and Stanley, North Carolina,
and two of the three Clover, South Carolina, wastewater treatment plants
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. However,
the loadings of the two Clover plants are based on relatively few sam-
ples.
* See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
11
The operators of the Bessemer City, Dallas, and Gastonia #2, North
Carolina, and Clover #3, South Carolina, wastewater treatment plants did
not participate in the Survey; nutrient loads from these sources were
estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year, and flows were esti-
mated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
In addition to the listed point sources, a number of wastewater
treatment plants located well beyond the 40-kilometer limit of the Survey*
discharge to the South Fork Catawba River or its tributaries. These
plants have a combined population equivalence of 25,250 (Anonymous, 1971)
and include Conover (S.W. plant), Hickory (S.E. plant), Lincolnton, Long-
view, Maiden, and Newton (see map, page vi). Also, six unsampled point
sources with a combined design flow of 2,270 m 3 /day discharge to Paw
Creek (Taylor, 1976).
The many municipal point sources located well upstream in the Catawba
River drainage probably contribute minimal amounts of nutrients indirectly
to Lake Wylie because of nutrient entrapment in the intervening reservoirs.
See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Belmont, NC*
Bessemer City,
NC
Clover, SC
#1
#2
#3
Cramerton, NC*
Dallas, NC
Gastonia, NC
#1 *
#2*
Kings Mtn., NC*
McAdenville, NC*
Mount Holly, NC
Indust. Plt.k
act. sludge
act. sludge
tr. filter
cont. stab.
+ pond
900 secondary
1,135.5
27,600.2
4,163.5
4,984.8
317.9
4,243.0
Catawba River
Oats Creek!
Long Creek
Brown Creek!
Bea verdam
Creek
Calabash Creek
Allison Creek
S. Fk. Catawba
River
Dallas Br.!
Long Creek
Catawba Creek
Long Creek
McGill Br.
S. Fk. Catawba
River
Catawba River
Four privately-owned facilities
bined flow of 490 m 3 /day) discharge
1976); the nutrient impact of these
probably is minimal.
2. Known industrial -
treating domestic wastes (corn-
directly to Lake Wylie (Foley,
small sources is not known but
North Carolina industrial wastes of nutrient significance are
treated in municipal facilities. Two small industrial discharges
(combined flow of 49 rn 3 /day) are located in the South Carolina
portion of the lake drainage (Foley, op. cit.) but probably are
relatively insignificant.
Na me
Pop.
Served
6,000
4,000
Treatment
ext. aer.
tr. filter
Recei ving
Water
1,000 act. sludge
Mean Flow
(m 3 /d)
8,739.6
1,514.0
393.6
639.7
378.5
17,346.7
2,000
1 ,000
2,320
tr. filter
Imhoff tank
act. sludge
3,000 tr. filter
46,000
10,000
25,402
800
* More than 25% of waste load is industrial.

-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kgP/ %of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 64,710 14.5
S. Fk. Catawba River 174,350 39.2
Catawba Creek 9,900 2.2
Crowders Creek 1,520 0.3
Beaverdam Creek 955 0.2
Paw Creek 10,580 2.4
Allison Creek 1,535 0.3
Little Allison Creek 475 0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non—point load) - 4,115 0.9
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Belmont 37,585 8.4
Bessemer City 4,535 1.0
Clover
#1 1,035 0.2
#2 1,905 0.4
#3 1,135 0.3
Cramerton 8,035 1.8
Dallas 3,400 0.8
Gastonia
#1 71,495 16.1
#2 11,340 2.5
Kings Mountain 22,875 5.1
McAdenville 1,120 0.3
Mt. Holly Indust. Plt. 3,270 0.7
Ranlo 1,010 0.2
Stanley 7,115 1.6
d. Septic tanks* - 30 <0.1
e. Known industrial - insignificant
f. Direct precipitation** - 930 0.2
Total 444,955 100.0
* Estimate based on 106 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
14
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 176,385
3. Net annual P accumulation — 268,570 kg.

-------
15
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) —
c. Known municipal SIP’s -
Belmont
Bessemer City
Clover
#1
#2
#3
kgN/ %of
______ total
23,020
13,605
3,070
3,760
3,400
28,370
10,205
91 ,885
34,010
39,975
2,280
9,880
1 ,710
1 5 , 1 90
1,130
insignificant
57,325
3,660,340
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.3
2.5
0.9
1.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
0.4
<0.1
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading — Average Year:
1. Inputs —
yr
Source
a. Tributaries (non-point load) —
Catawba River
S. Fk. Catawba River
Catawba Creek
Crowders Creek
Beaverdam Creek
Paw Creek
Allison Creek
Little Allison Creek
2,290,185
728,090
31,160
133,815
16,600
20,240
34,905
6,705
62.6
19.9
0.9
3.7
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.2
59,825 1.6
Cramerton
Dallas
Gastonia
#1
#2
Kings Mountain
McAdenvi lie
Mt. Holly Indust. Plt.
Ranlo
Stanley
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial -
f. Direct precipitation** - ________ 1.6
Total 100.0
* Estimate based on 106 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
16
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 2,753,045
3. Net annual N accumulation - 907,295 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
Catawba River 12 431
S. Fk. Catawba River 106 444
Catawba Creek 142 446
Crowders Creek 5 474
Beaverdam Creek 19 337
Paw Creek 301 575
Allison Creek 14 307
Little Allison Creek 17 247

-------
17
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his “dangerous” loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his ‘ 1 permissible” loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between “dangerous”
and “permissible”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m 2 /yr 8.38 5.06 68.9 17.1
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/ni 2 /yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Wylie:
“Dangerous” (eutrophic loading) 1.56
“Permissible” (oligotrophic loading) 0.78

-------
18
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Pubi. OWP-l, vol. 4, Wash., DC.
Foley, John R., 1976. Personal coimiunication (permitted point
sources in SC portion of Lake Wylie drainage). SC Dept. of
Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Mast, G. Nelson, 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
SC Dept. of Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Taylor, Julian, 1974. Personal communication (wastewater treat-
ment plant information). NC Dept. of Natural & Econ. Res.,
Raleigh.
______________ 1976. Personal comunication (Paw Creek point
sources). NC Dept. of Natural & Econ. Res., Raleigh.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Pubi. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.

-------
Vi. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS

-------
DATA TO 3E USLU IN RANKINGS
LAKE
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEDIAN
TOTAL
P
MEDIAN
PdORG
N
500—
MEAN SEC
MEAN
CI-ILORA
15
MIN i)C
i [ DIAN
DISS ORI-it)
P
4503
FISHING C . EEPS
ESE VU1r
0.143
0.535
4 3.000
2.811
1O.20C
0.051
‘.504
LAKE GREEN . OOD
0.061
0.470
‘.63.917
8.150
15.000
0.011
‘.505
LA SE HARTwELL
0.013
0.130
‘.22.000
6.157
15.000
0.00..
4506
LAKE MARION
0.055
0.280
470.17
8.728
14.90C
0.010
‘.507
LAKE MuRRAY
0.024
0.260
‘.24.905
6. ’ .’B
15.000
0.007
4508
LAKE O81NSO’
0.014
0.260
458.778
8.611
1 ’ ..000
0.005
4510
LAKE WATEREE
0.094
0. ’ . 0
475.667
8.408
14.100
0.03’.
4511
LAKE WYLIE
0.045
0.380
‘.62.222
5.422
14.800
0.013
4512
LAKE MOULTRIE
0.026
0.200
‘.55.36
d.800
11.200
0.0Db
4513
LAKE KEOWEE
0.008
0.170
371.750
2. 133
l s.000
0.003
4514
LAKE SECESSION
0.057
0.355
462.778
10.722
15.000
0.006
4515
SALUOA LAKE
0.046
0.230
476,833
1.517
10.800
0.006
‘.516
LAKE WILLIAM C. BUWEN
0.022
0.360
459.889
3.911
15.000
0.007

-------
PERCENT OF LAKES 1T,1 HjGH [ ) VALUES (NUMBE OF LAKES 1TH I 4IGHE VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MEDIAN 500— MEAN 15- MEDIAN INUE
CODE LAKE NAME TOTAL P INOPG N MEAN SEC C 1LOPA MIIi DO DISS O T iO P
4503 FISHING CREEK ESERVOI’ 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 92 ( 11) 100 ( 12) 0 ( 0) 192
4504 LAKE (,PEENWQOJ 17 ( 2) P ( 1) 33 ( 4) 42 ( S) 21 ( U) 25 ( 3) 146
4505 LAKE. HARTIELL 92 11) 100 ( 12) 92 ( 11) 58 ( 7) 21 ( 0) 92 ( 11) 455
4506 LAKE MARION 33 ( 4) 50 ( 6) 25 ( 3) 17 ( 2) 50 ( 6) 33 ( 4) 208
4507 LAKE MURRAY 67 ( 8) 62 ( 7) 83 C 10) 50 C 6) 21 ( 0) 46 C 5) 329
4508 LAKE ROBINSON 83 C 10) 62 C 7) 67 1 8) 25 3) 75 9) 83 C 10)
4510 LAKE WATE -CEE 8 C 1) 17 1 2) 17 C 2) 33 C 4) 67 C 8) 8 C 1) 150
4511 LAKE WYLIE SO C 6) 25 1 3) 0 C 6) 67 C 8) 58 C 7) 17 C 2) 267
4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 58 C 7) 83 ( 10) 75 ( 9) 8 C 1) 83 C 10) 71 C ) 378
4513 LAKE KEOWEE 100 ( 12) 92 C 11) 100 C 12) 83 C 10) 21 C 0) 100 C 12) 496
4514 LAKE SECESSION ?5 C 3) 42 1 5) ‘.2 C 5) 0 C U) 21 C 0) 58 C 7) 188
4515 SALUDA LAKE 42 C 5) 75 ( 9) 8 C 1) 100 C 12) 92 C 11) 71 C 8) 388
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 5 C 9) 33 ( ‘i 58 C 7) 75 C 9) 21 C 0) 4b C 5) 308

-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4513 LAKE KEOwEE 496
2 4505 LAKE I-4ARTWELL 455
3 450d LAKE ROBINSoN 395
4 4515 SALUDA LAKE 388
5 4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 378
6 4507 LAKE MURRAY 329
7 4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 308
8 4511 LAKE WYLIE 267
9 4506 LAKE MARION 208
10 4503 FISHIN(, CREEK RESERVOIR 192
11 4514 LAKE SECSSION 188
12 4510 LAKE wATEREt. 150
13 4504 LAKE GREENWOOD 146

-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
CONVERSION FA(;TORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile

-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR SOUTH CAROLINA 04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4511 LAKE WYLIE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 7821.8
SUP-DRAINAGE NORMALIZEL) FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY ARFA(SO KM) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT N09 DEC MEAN
451)6) 35.2 0.7’. 0.93 1.05 0.68 0.34 0.23 0.31 0.25 0.17 0.23 0.34 0.45 0.47
451 181 5309.5 100.2’. 127.99 150.65 114.40 68.53 52.95 52.39 48.14 41.06 45.87 50.40 68.53 76.47
451182 7821.8 136.66 149.96 154.49 148.26 106.10 91.96 84.32 91.11 82.90 80.92 97.33 101.58 110.20
451IC1 1639.5 27.27 34.55 35.40 30.87 20.98 18.18 16.28 17.19 13.45 17.67 17.02 22.60 22.55
45)11)1 69.9 1.50 1.84 2.’J7 1.39 0.68 0.45 0.62 0.51 0.3’. 0.45 0.68 0.91 0.95
451 )11 282.3 6.03 7.42 8.33 5.55 2.78 1.84 2.55 2.10 1.39 1.84 2.78 3.71 3.84
4511F1 49.2 1.05 1.30 1.44 0.96 0.48 0.31 0.45 0.37 0.25 0.31 0.48 0.65 0.67
45111)1 113.7 2.44 2.97 3.34 2.24 1.10 0.74 1.02 0.85 0.57 0.74 1.10 1.50 1.54
451 1H1 27.2 0.59 0.71 0.79 0.54 0.25 0.17 0.25 0.20 0.1’. 0.17 0.25 0.37 0.37
4 S I IZZ 244.8 5.21 6.43 7.22 4.81 2.41 1.61 2.2) 1.81 1.22 1.61 2.41 3.20 3.33
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 7821.8 TOTAL FLOW IN = 1327.31
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS = 7771.3 TOTAL FLOW OUT = 1325.57
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWSICMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4511A1 2 73 1.472 17 1.189
3 73 2.067 20 0.510
4 73 1.586 19 0.283
5 73 0.198 19 0.113
6 73 1.189 18 0.396
7 73 0.227 16 0.113
8 73 0.198 10 0.085
9 73 0.198 17 0.170
10 73 0.283 10 0.113
11 73 0.198 19 0.035
12 73 0.283 17 0.481
I 7’. 0.765 11 0.283 0.623
2 7 ’. 1.048 12 0.538
451 )1)) 2 73 132.240 17 106.471
3 73 202.465 20 272.974
4 73 172.453 19 2)0.961
S 73 171.600 19 28.317
6 73 121.196 18 168.485
7 73 116.099 16 78. 154
8 73 113.267 10 133.939
9 73 92.879 17 106.188
10 73 48.422 10 59.465
11 73 66.261 19 29.166
12 73 92.879 17 99.109
1 74 127.426 11 126.010 26 90.614
2 74 136.487 12 175.564

-------
TRI8LjTAR Y FLOW INFORMATION FUN 500114 CANOLINA 04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4511 LAKE WYLIE
MEAN MONT+ILY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRI8UTARY MONTiI YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4511 2 2 73 222.287 17 294.495
3 73 297.327 20 368.119
4 73 270.426 19 322.812
5 73 212.376 19 23.220
6 73 192.555 18 198.218
7 73 146.115 16 110.436
8 73 132.5?3 10 167.069
9 73 135.638 17 175.564
10 73 69.943 10 61.164
II 73 81.553 19 47.006
12 73 111.852 17 162.822
7’. 186.891 11 226.535 26 158.574
2 74 225.402 12 232.198
‘ . S IIC I 2 73 53.802 17 30.299
3 73 62.580 20 84.384
4 73 59.182 19 39.644
5 73 39.644 19 26.901
6 73 32.281 18 52.386
7 73 21.521 16 29.733
8 73 16. 141 10 16.141
9 73 22.653 17 32.848
10 73 14.328 10 14.158
11 73 16.141 19 14.158
12 73 21.521 17 19.822
74 50.121 11 30.016 26 56.634
2 74 44.741 12 35.962
4511LJ 1 2 73 2.917 17 2.379
3 73 4.106 20 0.991
4 73 3.143 19 0.538
5 73 0.396 19 0.198
6 73 2.379 18 0.765
7 73 0.425 16 0.227
8 73 0.368 10 0.198
9 73 0.425 17 0.340
10 73 0.538 10 0.255
II 73 0.396 19 0.198
12 73 0.566 17 0.963
1 74 1.529 11 0.538 26 1.218
2 74 2.067 12 1.076
45 11E1 2 73 11.723 17 9.571
3 73 16.707 20 4.021
4 73 12.658 19 2.152
5 73 1.586 19 0.793
6 73 9.571 18 3.087
7 73 1.727 16 0.934
8 73 1.472 10 0.165
9 73 1.699 11 1.388
10 73 2. 1s2 10 1.019
11 73 1.501 19 0.765
12 73 2.322 Ii 3.851
I 74 6.173 11 2.152 26 4.927
2 74 8.325 12 4.332

-------
TRISUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOP SOOT - i CAROLINA 04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4511 LAIcE WYLIE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWSCMS
TRIbUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4 511F 1 2 73 2.039 17 1.671
3 73 2.888 20 0.708
73 2.209 19 0.368
5 73 0.283 19 0.142
6 73 1.671 15 0.538
7 73 0.311 16 0.170
B 73 0.255 10 0.142
9 73 0.2B3 17 0.255
10 73 0.368 10 0.170
11 73 0.283 19 0.142
12 73 0.396 17 0.680
1 74 1.076 11 0.368 24 0.850
2 74 1.444 12 0.165
451161 2 73 4.129 17 3.851
3 73 6.711 20 1.614
4 73 5.097 19 0.878
5 73 0.623 19 0.311
6 73 3.851 18 1.246
7 73 0.708 16 0.368
8 73 0.595 10 0.311
9 73 0.680 17 0.566
10 73 0.875 11 0.396
I l 73 0.651 19 0.311
12 73 0.934 17 1.557
I 74 2.492 11 0.878 26 1.982
2 74 3.341 12 1.727
451 1H 1 2 73 1.133 17 0.934
3 73 1.614 20 0.396
4 73 1.218 19 0.198
5 73 0.142 19 0.085
6 73 0.934 18 0.283
7 73 0.170 16 0.085
8 73 0.142 10 0.085
9 73 0.170 17 0.142
10 73 0.198 II 0.085
11 73 0.142 19 0.085
12 73 0.227 17 0.368
1 74 0.595 11 0.198 26 0.481
2 74 0.793 12 0.425
451112 2 73 10.194 17 8.?97
3 73 14.442 20 3.483
4 73 10.959 19 1.869
5 73 1.359 19 0.705
6 73 8.297 IS 2.642
7 73 1.501 16 0.793
8 13 1.274 10 0.680
9 73 1.472 17 1.218
10 73 1.869 10 0.878
I l 73 1.6’.? 19 0.680
12 73 1.98? 17 3.341
I 7’. 5.352 II 1.869 26 4.276
2 74 7.221 12 3.738

-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
DATE
PROM
TO
73/0 3/28
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 35 0000
14 35 0006
14 35 0015
14 35 0025
14 35 0040
14 35 0056
18 00 0000
IA 00 0012
18 00 0015
18 00 0030
18 00 0059
15 35 0000
15 35 0015
15 35 0035
15 35 0056
MG/L P
0.0 70
0.0 58
0.058
0.056
0.055
0.06 1
0.035
0.020
0.024
0 .02 3
0.067
0.024
0.023
0.0 23
0.0 32
451101
35 01 08.0 081 00 35.0 3
LAKE WYLIE
‘5091 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
I1EPAL ES 2111202
0063 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.0
9.2
8.6
5.5
4.2
1.5
0.2
5.8
5.4
5.2
3.4
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALK
N,13—N
TOT KJEL
00630
NO2 NO3
00671
FHOM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELO
CACO)
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/I
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
MG/L
MC.,/L
MG/L
NG/L
MG/L P
73/03/28
14 35 0000
13.6
12
70
7.50
12
0.120
0.400
0.350
14 35 0006
13.3
70
6.80
11
0.120
0.300
0.018
14 35 0015
13.2
65
7.40
II
0.110
0.500
0.340
0.017
1’. 35 0025
13.0
65
7.50
11
0.110
0.300
0.340
0.016
44 35 0040
12.3
65
7.50
14
0.100
0.200
0.340
44 35 0056
12.3
65
7.50
12
0.110
0.200
0.350
0.016
73/07/1?
18 00 0000
30.4
50
74
8.30
20
0.220
1.700
0.090
0.011
18 00 0005
29.8
74
18 00 0012
29.2
75
6.70
48
0.130
0.300
0.100
0.005
18 00 0015
28.6
74
6.50
18
0.130
0.200K
0.120
18 00 0020
28.3
73
18 00 0030
27.4
77
6.40
20
0.150
0.300
0.190
0.006
lB 00 0040
26.3
83
18 00 0050
24.6
95
18 00 0059
24.4
98
6.60
28
0.250
0.700
0.080
0.006
73/09/20
45 35 0000
27.3
54
73
6.53
Il
0.080
0.700
15 35 0015
26.9
70
6.50
12
0.100
0.600
0.040
15 35 0035
26.8
72
6.40
12
0.100
15 35 0056
26.5
9Q
0.040
0.010
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CIILRPHYL
A
UG/L
73/07/1?
73/09/20
2.5
5.7
4.?
K VALUE KNOWN TO dE.
LtSS T,IAM INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451102
35 05 08.0 081 03 35.0 3
LAKE WYLIE
45091 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
1 1EPALES
0042 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/03/28 15 20 0000
15 20 0006
15 20 0015
15 20 0025
15 20 0037
73/07/12 17 30 0000
17 30 0006
17 30 0015
17 30 0026
17 30 0038
73/09/20 16 00 0000
16 00 0015
16 00 0028
0.051
0.051
0.056
0.056
0.068
0.026
0.0 29
0.033
0.045
0.063
0.030
0.0 22
0.038
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
73/03/28 15 20 0000
15 20 0006
15 20 0015
15 20 0025
15 20 0037
73/07/12 17 30 0000
17 30 0006
17 30 0015
17 30 0026
17 30 0038
73/09/20 16 00 0000
16 00 0015
16 00 0028
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
1 ALK
NH3-N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SI)
MG/L
P46/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
14.3
24
70
7.50
16
0.080
0.400
0.330
0.021
13.6
9.5
70
7.50
15
0.080
0.300
0.330
0.018
13.3
9.6
70
7.50
14
0.080
0.300
0.330
0.018
13.0
9.5
70
7.50
13
0.080
0.200
0.330
0.017
12.2
8.5
90
7.40
14
0.130
0.300
0.320
0.016
30.4
55
64
7.90
19
0.090
0.400
0.070
0.005
29.5
7.9
63
7.20
19
0.100
0.200
0.100
0.004
28.4
5.7
96
6.70
19
0.160
0.200
0.150
0.004
26.5
1.2
98
6.40
26
0.360
0.500
0.240
0.007
25.6
0.8
110
6.50
27
0.450
0.800
0.290
0.005
27.5
6.8
48
73
6.50
13
0.060
0.700
0.050
0.011
26.6
5.8
72
6.50
11
0.090
0.400
0.050
0.012
26.5
5.6
75
6.40
15
0.100
0.600
0.050
0.012
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/I P UG/L
9.3
6.2
5.0

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
73/03/28 16 00 0000 0.075
16 00 0006 0.120
16 00 0012 0.080
16 00 0018 0.06’.
16 00 0025 0.054
16 00 0037 0.043
73/07/12 14 30 0000 0.069
14 30 0006 0.026
14 30 0015 3.032
14 30 0025 0.037
14 30 0035 0.058
73/09/20 16 25 0000 0.032
16 25 0010 0.034
16 ?5 0020 0.045
16 25 0033 0.043
41103
35 09 02.0 081 02 00.0 3
LA cE IYLIE
45091 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
I1EPALES 2111202
0042 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME
OF
OAY
DEPTH
FEET
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
00
MG/L
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
00096
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
HICROMMO
00400
PH
SU
00410
7 ALK
CACO3
P40/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
HG/L
00630
NO2 NO3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PHOS—DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
73/03/28
73/07/12
73/09/20
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
14 30
14 30
14 30
14 30
14 30
16 25
16 25
16 25
16 25
0000
0006
0012
0018
0025
0037
0000
0006
0015
0025
0035
0000
0010
0020
0033
18.3
13.2
13.2
13.2
13.1
13.0
32.5
30.9
27.4
27.2
26.0
28.9
26.8
26.4
24.9
9.1
0.3
9.4
9.7
9.6
8.2
4.6
4.1
1.3
6.4
4.8
5.0
6.0
15
34
48
70
72
73
68
65
65
66
64
61
63
77
78
71
79
105
7.30
7.40
7.40
7.40
7.40
7.50
7.00
7.10
6.50
6.40
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.40
16
16
16
IS
16
16
21
19
22
19
25
16
14
16
I)
0.100
0.170
0.130
0.110
0.090
0.080
0.110
0.120
0.250
0.210
0.410
0.060
0.120
0.130
0.060
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.600
1.000
0.600
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.360
0.440
0.380
0.350
0.310
0.300
0.200
0.130
0.270
0.250
0.200
0.130
0.100
0.130
0.120
0.032
0.051
0.031
0.025
0.016
0.013
0.005
0.003
0.007
0.008
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.022
0.015
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME
OF
L)AY
DEPTH
FEET
00665
PHOS—TOT
MO/L P
32217
CIILRPHYL
A
IJO/L
4.0
5.7
5.7

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/13
451104
35 14 12.0 081 00 45.0 3
LAKE WYLIE
37071 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
1 1EPALES
0023 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/04/02 10 05 0000
10 05 0006
10 Os 0012
73/07/12 14 00 0000
14 00 0006
14 00 0012
14 00 0019
73/09/20 16 45 0000
16 45 0015
0.045
0.042
0.058
0 • 020
0.016
0.023
0.023
0.027
0.0 32
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/04/02
10 05
10 05
10 05
0000
0006
0012
73/07/12
14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
0000
0006
0012
0019
73/09/20
16 45
16 45
0000
0015
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
10.0
9.9
6.2
6.0
5.9
4.2
1.8
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
1
ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTIIO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICRONHO
SU
14G/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
13.6
12
60
7.30
11
0.090
0.200
0.290
0.006
13.3
60
7.50
11
0.080
0.200K
0.290
0.005
13.3
60
7.40
11
0.070
0.200K
0.280
0.009
27.2
54
6.50
18
0.120
0.300
0.180
0.003
26.5
52
6.50
19
0.120
0.200K
0.180
0.003
26.4
51
6.40
20
0.110
0.200K
0.160
0.003
26.3
51
6.40
21
0.110
0.200K
0.170
0.003
25.5
34
100
6.30
11
0.120
0.600
0.100
0.006
25.1
116
6.30
12
0.150
0.700
0.100
0.006
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
3.3
3.2
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN If’iDICATEO

-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4511A1 37X1A 1
35 14 00.0 081 01 00.0 4
PA CREEK (NC)
45 MECP(LENBURG Co P4
T/CATAWBA LAKE 030891
3RD(, ON D 3 MI SW OF DOUGLAS AIRFIELD
1IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PiIOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
Fi OM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/17 12 15 0.350 0.190 0.075 0.088 0.160
73/03/20 10 40 0.250 0.640 0.028 0.013 0.145
73/04/19 10 00 0.231 0.240 0.048 0.231 0.315
73/05/19 10 50 0.336 1.050 0.120 0.340 0.460
73/06/18 14 45 0.753 1.320 0.147 0.394 0.540
73/07/16 10 35 0.470 0.540 0.170 0.7 1Q 0.840
73/Q 3/10 1.260 0.690 0.118 0.910 1.150
73/09/17 11 20 0.590 0.500 0.120 0.850 1.050
73/10/10 11 10 1.300 0.800 0.140 1.450 1.720
73/11/19 10 30 2.100 0.700 0.144 1.400 1.700
73/12/17 10 55 0.900 0.500 0.140 0.440 0.610
74/01/11 0.540 0.600 0.072 0.350 0.630
74/01/26 10 45 0.300 0.500 0.052 ).072 0.180
74/02/12 10 30 0.640 0.400 0.085 0.170 0.250

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4511 1 37X1 8 1
35 15 30.0 081 01 00.0 4
CATAWBA RIVER (SiC)
45 GASTON Co HWY MA
I/CATAW8A LAKE 030891
US HWY 85 8 DG E OF N BELMONT
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS P1-lOS—TOT
FROM OF N—IOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/17 12 00 0.220 0.190 0.048 0.013 0.020
73/03/20 10 15 0.290 0.460 0.091 0.030
73/04/19 09 45 0.231 0.265 0.032 0.010 0.035
73/05/19 10 30 0.210 0.790 0.035 0.013 0.03
73/06/18 14 30 0.231 1.150 0.096 0.007 0.052
73/07/16 10 25 0.126 0.200 0.053 0.009 0.022
73/08/10 10 00 0.066 0.260 0.046 O.005 1 0.025
73/09/17 11 00 0.071 0.330 0.075 0.005K 0.025
73/10/10 10 55 0.065 0.500 0.100 0.013 0.022
73/11/19 10 15 0.100 1.800 0.136 0.008 0.025
73/12/17 10 40 0.192 0.500 0.052 0.012 0.030
74/01/11 10 30 0.264 0.450 0.044 0.016 0.027
74/01/26 10 35 0.252 0.900 0.072 0.020
74/02/12 10 20 0.320 3.100 0.130 0.010 0.025
ic VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INL)ICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL JATE 76/04/27
451 132
35 03 00.0 081 00 30.0 4
CATAWdA RIVER
45 YORK Co HWY MAP
0/CATAWBA LAKE 030891
BANK ON w S lOE AT END OF CO RT 30
11 .PALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTI-lO
TO DAY FEET MG/L M( /L MG/I MG/L P MG/I
73/02/17 12 45 0.240 0.3 0 0.084 0.042 0.091
73/03/20 11 00 0.290 0.500 0.100 0.040 0.095
73/u4/19 10 30 0.270 0.260 0.056 0.029 0.060
73/05/19 11 30 0.138 0.830 0.061 0.008 0.035
73/06/18 15 20 0.120 0.400 0.084 u.020 0.040
73/07/16 11 15 0.110 0.400 0.176 0.009 0.025
73/08/10 0.054 0.370 0.115 0.022 0.027
73/09/17 11 50 0.035 0.580 0.132 0.008 0.030
73/10/10 11 45 0.080 0.380 0.138 0.021 0.025
73/11/19 11 00 0.208 0.650 0.100 0.024 0.035
73/12/17 11 30 0.224 0.700 0.088 0.0’.0 0.075
74/01/11 17 25 0.330 0.900 0.0e8 0.040 0.070
74/01/26 11 IS 0.368 1.800 0.288 0.032 0.060
74/02/12 11 15 0.380 0.300 0.055 0.035 0.060

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4511C1 37X1C1
35 16 00.0 081 04 00.0 4
S FORK CATAW8A RIVER (NC)
45 GASTON CO HWY MA
T/CATAWt3A LAKE 030891
Bi QG ON US 85 JUST E OF LOWELL
I IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I HG/L P HG/L P
73/02/17 11 30 0.400 0.370 0.120 0.092 0.150
73/03/20 10 45 0.390 0.500 0.074 0.066 0.160
73/04/19 09 30 0.399 0.340 0.075 0.110 0.175
73/05/19 10 15 0.370 1.100 0.096 0.139 0.210
73/06/18 14 10 0.490 0.154 0.090 0.260
73/07/16 10 05 0.640 0.620 0.080 0.110 0.460
73/08/10 0.640 0.420 0.063 0.154 0.300
73/09/17 10 40 0.530 0.500 0.110 0.320 0.450
73/10/10 10 40 0.930 0.750 0.220 0.273 0.383
73/11/19 10 05 0.460 1.050 0.552 0.380 0.480
73/12/17 10 30 0.450 0.500 0.076 0.184 0.270
74/01/11 10 15 0.420 0.600 0.104 0.020 0.220
74/01/26 10 20 0.430 1.100 0.168 0.052 0.360
74/02/12 10 05 0.50’. 0.500 0.070 0.090 0.188

-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
‘.51101 37)(1L)1
35 11 30.0 081 05 00.0 4
CATAWBA CREEIc (NC)
45 GASTON CO HWY MA
T/CATAWBA LAKE 030891
B 0G ON RD ? MI S OF CRAMERTON
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO OAY FEET MG/L M j/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/02/17 11 10 0.980 1.680 0.760 2.000 2.200
73/03/20 10 30 0.780 1.300 0.160 0.530 0.730
73/04/19 09 15 1.020 2.400 1.260 2.000 2.200
73/0 /19 09 50 2.4S0 2.510 1.440 3.400 3.700
73/06/18 13 50 2.300 1.540 0.115 1.120 1.45
73/07/16 09 45 3.000 1.200 0.066 2.900 3.1 0
73/08/10 2.200 1 300 0.115 3.525 3.900
73/09/17 10 20 3.300 1.100 0.082 3.425 3.800
73/10/10 10 20 4.300 2.300 0.273 4.200 4.700
73/11/19 09 50 2.520 2.100 0.470 3.700 4.100
73/12/11 10 05 3.520 1.375 0.072 2.760 2.840
74/01/11 10 00 4.200 1.100 0.064 1.800 2.100
74/01/26 10 05 0.990 1.200 0.076 0.540 0.810
741)2/12 09 45 1.900 2.200 0.270 1.150 1.800

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451 Ii
35 07 30.0 081 07 00.0 4
C OW0ERS CREEP(
45 YORK Co HWY MAP
T/CATAwBA LAPcE 030891
BROG ON RT 557 6 MI E OF CLOVER
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/I MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/17 10 30 0.290 0.630 0.280 0.058 0.155
73/03/20 10 15 0.231 0.990 0.189 0.038 0.250
73/04/19 0.410 0.620 0.270 0.100 0.230
73/05/19 09 40 0.480 1.000 0.085 0.066 0.120
73/06/18 13 40 0.490 0.600 0.068 0.055 0.235
73/07/16 09 25 0.680 0.720 0.294 0.075 0.185
73/08/10 0.800 0.690 0.252 0.091 0.185
73/0 /17 10 05 0.910 0.960 0.380 0.075 0.260
73/10/10 09 50 1.020 1.260 0.430 0.120 0.250
73/11/19 09 40 0.570 0.800 0.400 0.100 0.190
73/12/17 09 45 0.470 1.100 0.440 0.112 0.240
74/01/11 09 45 0.352 0.700 0.124 0.028 0.130
74/01/26 09 50 0.312 1.500 0.305 0.058
74/02/12 09 30 0.420 0.800 0.190 0.040 0.140

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451 IFI
31 07 00.0 081 07 00.0 4
b€AVEROAH CREEv<
45 YORK CO HWY MAP
T/CATAwBA LAl E 050791
kO 8R06 6 MI E OF CLOVEN
1 1EPALES 211120’.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—IOT
FNOM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/17 10 15 0.470 0.150 0.089 0.027 0.050
73/03/20 10 05 0.300 1.380 0.056 0.027 0.080
73/04/19 08 50 0.400 0.200 0.021 0.027 0.055
73/05/19 09 30 0.510 0.190 0.021 0.058 0.v80
73/06/18 13 35 0.470 0.390 0.022 0.075 0.100
73/07/16 09 50 0.480 0.200 0.031 0.065 0.105
73/08/10 0.500 0.230 0.027 0.060 0.100
73/09/17 10 00 0.450 0.300 0.021 0.065 0. l lu
73/10/10 09 ‘.5 0.430 0.420 0.069 0.079 0.120
73/11/19 09 30 0. ’ .10 0.575 0.080 0.064 0.095
73/12/17 09 40 0.588 0.600 0.100 0.040 0.075
74/01/11 09 40 0.540 0.600 0.064 0.040 0.070
74/01/26 09 45 0.320 0.800 0.068 0.044 0.135
74/02/12 09 25 0.552 0.250 0.055 0.12S

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451161
35 05 30.0 081 07 30.0 4
ALLISON CREEK
45 YORK Co HWY MAP
T/CATA WBA LAKE
SC RT 49 B DG 6.5
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
030891
MI ESE OF CLOVER
2111204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
73/02/17
09
50
0.260
0.160
0.056
0.024
0.065
73/03/20
10
00
0.240
0.650
0.069
0.031
0.120
73/04/19
08
35
0.210
0.270
0.017
0.023
0.060
73/05/19
09
10
0.290
0.210
0.020
0.044
0.075
73/06/18
13
25
0.300
1.150
0.019
0.042
0.090
73/07/16
09
05
0.294
0.150
0.029
0.044
0.095
73/ Oa/10
0.360
0.230
0.019
0. OSO
0.095
73/09/17
09
.5
0.300
0.280
0.024
0.046
0.095
73/lU/ Il
09
30
0.340
1.890
0.138
0.052
0.090
73/11/19
09
15
0.288
0.200
0.032
0.060
0.130
73/12/17
09
23
0.330
0.800
0.092
0.028
0.085
74/01/11
09
25
0.288
0.400
3.042
0.032
0.070
74/01/26
09
30
0.240
1.200
0.052
0.032
0.165
74/02/12
09
10
0.306
0.300
0.040
0.017
0.060

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451 1H1
35 02 00.0 081 06 30.0 4
LITTLE ALLISON CREEK
45 YORK Co HWY MAP
T/CATAwBA LAKE 030891
RT 274 B DG 8.5 MI SE OF CLOVER
I 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEEl MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/02/17 09 35 0.168 0.100K 0.020 0.014 0.035
73/03/20 09 45 0.115 0.440 0.027 0.021 0.060
73/04/19 08 25 0.091 0.180 0.040 0.013 0.030
73/05/19 09 00 0.280 0.240 0.033 0.018 0.030
73/06/18 13 15 0.190 0.700 3.052 0.033 0.055
73/07/16 0.200 0.110 0.017 0.023 0.045
73/08/10 08 40 0.280 0.220 0.018 0.022 0.045
73/09/17 09 30 0.200 0.230 0.012 0.023 0.045
73/10/11 09 15 0.151 0.480 0.115 0.016 0.035
73/11/19 09 00 0.028 0.100K 0.016 0.012 0.012
7311d/17 09 15 0.176 0.600 0.036 .016 0.030
74/U i/ I l 09 15 0.192 0.200 0.020 0.016 0.025
74/01/26 09 10 0.132 1.000 0.032 0.024 0.090
74/02/12 09 00 0.252 0.900 0.065 0.020 0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDIC4TEL)

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
45118A P04511 8A P0O6000
35 15 00.0 081 01 00.0 4
bELMONT NC
45 GASTON CO HWY MA
T/LAKE CATAWBA 030891
CATAW8A RIVER
1 IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
73/05/09 06 00
CP(T)— 7.000 2.600 0.345 10.800 11.000 2.300 2.300
73/05/09 22 00
73/06/12 06 00
CP(T)— 6.000 1.600 0.600 10.000 12.500 2.250 2.500
73/06/12 22 00
73/07/11 06 00
CP(T)— 10.000 2.000 0.250 9.600 11.000 3.000 2.000
73/07/11 20 00
73/08/17 06 00
CPU)— 1.400 6.400 2.560 0.062 2.500 2.300
73/08/17 18 00
73/09/12 06 00
CP(T)— 4.540 2.600 0.140 9.900 9.900 2.000 2.300
73/09/12 20 00
73/10/11 06 00
CP(T)— 6.100 1.300 0.037 9.925 10.270 3.000 2.500
73/10/11 20 00
73/11/14 06 00
CPU)— 0.120 8.900 0.510 14.250 16.000 2.500 2.500
73/11/14 20 00
73/12/14 06 00
CP(T)— 2.400 5.200 0.120 12.600 12.600 2.500 2.300
73/12/14 06 00
74/01/17 12 00
CP(T)— 1.760 2.500 0.240 10.100 10.100 2.500 2.100
74/01/18 12 00
74/02/14 06 00
CP(T)— 0.720 1.600 0.230 12.000 12.000 2.500 2.300
74/02/15 06 00
74/03/13 06 00
CPU)— 0.280 2.700 0.082 12.550 12.600 2.000 2.300
74/03/14 06 00

-------
STORET REIPIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451168 N045 1188 P000900
35 18 00.0 081 01 03.0 4
MOUNT HOLLY INDUSTRIAL PLA 1
‘5 250 CPIARLOITE
T/LAi E VLIE 030891
CAIAW8A RIVER
1 IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT )(JEL NH3-N PIIOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MOO
10 DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L INST MOD MONTHLY
73/06/15 14 00 5.800 2.500 0.053 2.830 3.100 1.260 1.130
73/07/13 07 00
cPfl— 4.100 2.100 0.070 2.900 3.000 1.530 1.110
73/07/13 14 00
73/ d/O9 09 00
CP(fl— 6.100 3.000 0.302 2.600 2.800 1.330 0.803
73/08/09 16 00
73/09/14 06 00
CP(T)— 5.000 1.300 0.072 2.000 2.000 1.803 1.040
73/09,14 13 00
73/10/12 06 00
CPU)— 4.100 1.000 0.480 2.025 2.075 1.710 1.160
73/10/12 13 00
73/11/16 06 00
CP(T)— 3.000 1.900 0.061 1.785 1.957 1.640 1.280
73/11/16 13 00
73/ 1 2/I ’. U6 00
CP(T)— ‘.400 3.000 0.030 2.310 2.600 1.870 1.250
73/12/14 13 00
74/01/18 06 00
CP(1)— 3.360 2.700 0.059 1.600 1.150 1.310 1.010
74/u 1/18 13 00
74/02/IS 06 00
CPU)— 1.680 1.600 0.0406 1.160 1.200 1.530 1.150
74/02/15 13 00
74/03/15 06 00
CP(T)— 5.400 1.000 0.0506 1.400 1.425 1.260 1.180
74/03/IS I] 00
74/04/18 06 00
5.040 1.600 0.0506 2.000 2.2u3 1.620 1.050
74/04/18 13 00
74/05/16 06 00
C1 ’ (1)— 5.520 3.600 0.100 1.550 1.800 0.830 1.180
74/05/16 13 00
74/06/14 06 00
CPU— 3.360 1.300 0.06P l.S00 1.700 1.910 1.230
74/Ob/14 13 00
6 VALUE 6NO N ro OE
LESS IRAN INDICATEO

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
AS4S1 1CA
05 00.0 4
CO HWY MA
P0 0 0800
451 1CA
35 16 30.0 081
MCADENVILLE NC
45 GAsTON
T/CATAWBA LAKE
S FONK CATAWSA RIVER
1IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0J0891
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
N113-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONL)UIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—M(iD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/07/02
14.000
6.000
0.250
9.510
11.000
0.080
0.085
73/08/12
4.600
2.100
0.370
3.200
9.800
0.080
0.080
73/09/18
15 00
6.600
4.600
0.640
9.500
10.600
0.083
0.080
73/10/02
00 00
CP(1)—
15.000
1.450
0.360
7.500
7.500
0.083
0.087
73/10/02
12 00
73/11/27
14 00
13.200
8.400
1.300
8.500
10.000
0.080
0.083
74/u l/03
9.000
8.100
0.480
4.200
6.600
0.085
0.088
74/02/01
11 00
6.400
16.000
3.840
7.200
10.500
0.089
0.085
74/03/07
17 00
16.000
8.200
1.850
8.600
10.500
0.079
0.082
74/04/24
15 00
18.000
7.400
1.300
8.100
10.000
0.085
0.088
74/05/01
15 00
18.500
13.000
2.500
9.300
11.000
0.075
0.082
74/06/04
16 00
13.000
6.800
0.390
7.800
8.600
0.075
0.085

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
AS451 ICB
04 30.0 4
Co HWY MA
p069615
451 1CB
35 14 00.0 081
CP AMEJ TON NC
45 GAS ON
T/CATAwE A LAKE
S FORK CATAWBA RIVER
1 1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
030891
00630
00625
00610
00671
00605
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NHJ-N
P -1OS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST M D
MONTHLY
73/06/1 ’ .
0.080
7.100
0.640
(i.710
1.350
‘ ..500
4.000
73/07/05
08
15
0.050
5.FiO O
0.021
0.850
1.650
4.700
4.500
73/08/09
08
00
0.070
4.100
0.057
0.390
1.300
5.100
4.500
73/09/06
08
00
6.200
0.105
0.960
1.400
4.400
4.500
73/10/02
08
30
0.270
4.?00
0.081
1.000
1.350
4.300
4.200
73/11/01
07
30
0.080
4.500
0.130
0.680
1.200
4.800
4.400
73/12/11
08
30
0.080
4.650
0.019
0.700
1.500
4.400
4.500
74/01/01
08
10
0.360
4.300
0.040K
0.890
1.650
4.000
4.500
74/02/06
13
30
0.040
3.500
0.040K
0.210
0.680
5.700
4.900
74/03/06
08
30
0.120
3.600
0.075
0.760
1.150
5.400
5.200
74/04/02
08
30
0.160
3.200
0.050K
0.970
1.450
5.000
4.900
74/05/01
07
00
0.080
3.500
0.090
0.490
0.813
5.200
4.900
c VALUE KNOWN 10 E
LESS THAN INflICi TE0

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/04/27
45j iDA
34 13 30.0 081
(.,A TONIA NC
45 GASTON
T/CATAwBA LAKE
CATAWBA CREEK
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
AS451 iDA
08 00.0 4
Co HWY MA
P046000°
030891
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TINE
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MOO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/ I .
MG/L P
MG/L ‘
INST MOD
MONTHLY
73/05/09
09
30
4.200
2.700
0.051
7.140
7.500
8.000
8.500
73/06/19
09
30
5.200
2.400
0.026
8.200
8.800
8.790
8.610
73/07/24
16
45
11.400
0.540
0.170
6.600
7.200
7.000
7.500
73/09/19
10
30
o.200
2.300
0.120
7.100
7.100
7.980
7.600
73/10/23
11
45
7.900
2.200
0.060
8.250
8.625
7. 00
7.080
74/01/29
09
00
5.280
2.700
0.072
4.500
6.800
7.360
6.400
74/02/01
14
00
7.400
2.800
0.080
6.000
6.400
7.680
6.500
74/03/05
14
30
S.880
6.500
0.220
5.700
6.300
7.500
7.200
74/04/30
09
30
5.700
5.400
0.092
6.300
7.500
7.700
7.000
74/05/17
10
30
5.400
2.800
0.150
6.100
6.900
7.600
6.900
74/06/13
09
30
7.000
2.400
0.057
6.200
6.200
7.300
7.200
74/07/25
09
45
5.400
2.200
0.190
5.600
6.300
8.100
6.600
74/09/09
14
30
15.000
2.400
0,140
5.700
6.350
8.400
7.100

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4511KA Pp 45l1XA P025402
34 59 30.0 081 21 00.0 4
MCGILL Ct KINGS MTN NC
45 CLEVELAND CO NC
T/CATAW A ES 030891
MCGILL BR
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 .NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/I
MG/L P
MG/I
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/05/14
08 00
CPU)—
0.155
33.000
15.400
12.400
14.000
1.430
1.500
73/05/14
15 00
73/06/14
0.105
25.000
6.900
11.000
13.000
1.270
1.300
73/07/13
0.370
24.000
5.100
9.703
11.003
1.200
1.450
73/0 /14
08 00
CPU)—
0.110
16.800
1.600
2.310
7.300
1.320
1.450
73/Oa/14
16 00
73/09/14
00 00
CP(T)—
0.037
12.400
2.420
8.600
9.200
1.600
1.500
73/09/14
08 00
73/10/15
07 30
CP(T)—
u.078
39.000
3.500
5.500
10.500
1.250
1.300
73/10/15
16 00
73/11/14
08 00
CP(T)—
0.100
13.000
0.740
8.600
10.000
1.120
1.100
73/11/14
16 00
73/12/14
08 00
CP(T)—
0.070
17.000
3.200
14.000
lh.000
4.500
1.300
73/12/14
16 00
74/01/14
00 00
CPU)—
16.000
2.600
0.323
7.200
7.850
1.170
1.200
74/01/14
08 00
74/02/14
08 30
CP(T)—
0.400
20.000
3.840
7.300
8.800
1.380
1.400
74/02/14
15 00
74/03/14
0.040
23.000
11.000
0.956
1.000
74/05/15
08 30
9.300
26.000
6.100
9.450
17.000
1.100
1.300

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL 1)ATE 76/04/27
4511 A TF4511 A
3 17 55.0 081 07 35.0 4
ANLO
45 250 CrIARLOTTE
T/LAKE WYLIE
LONG CREEK
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
P000600*
030891
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT JEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
Ir ST MGD
MONTHLY
73/08/14
1.150
3.300
0.720
1.600
4.400
0.050
0.050
73/09/22
8.200
6.600
3.970
6.000
7.200
0.060
0.075
73/10/17
00 00
21.200
6.600
3.100
15.600
17.600
0.090
0.085
73/11/28
12 00
20.800
3.900
0.110
10.200
10.500
0.083
0.085
74/01/14
16 00
2.900
7.100
1.800
2.300
3.b OO
0.075
0.090
74/02/04
16 00
0.520
4.500
1.480
1.280
2.800
0.070
0.085
74/ 3/18
15 00
30.000
14.500
12.130
14.500
0.075
0.082

-------
T0RET NETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
DATE
FROM
TO
73/Ob/ 12
CP(T)—
73/06/12
73/ 07/12
CP ( 1) —
73/07/12
7 3/09/18
CP(T)—
73/09/18
73/10/12
CP C T) —
73/10/ 12
73/11/12
CP C 1) —
73/11/12
73/12/26
Ce- (T) —
73/12/26
74/0 1/14
CP(T)—
74/0 1/14
74/02/14
CP CT) —
74/02/14
00630
TIME DEPTH ND2 NO3
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET HG/L
00 00
0.078
08 00
07 00
.230
17 00
08 00
0.046
17 00
08 00
3.100
17 00
08 00
0.270
16 00
08 00
0.630
17 00
08 00
1.160
17 00
08 00
1 • 160
17 00
3 13 15.0 081 22 05.0 4
CLJVEP 1
45 15 CLOVER
T/CATAw A LAKE 030891
BROwN CREEK
I1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEEl DEPTH CLASS 00
00625
00610
00671
00665 50051 50053
TOT KJEL
N 13—N
PHOS—DIS
i- HOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE FLOw—P4GO
MG/L
P4G/L
MG/L P
MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLi
18.900
2.960
3.100
6.200
25.600
7.900
5.200
10.500
18.000
6.250
6.220
9.100
24.000
7.300
7.800
10.500 0.090 0.237
27.000
7.800
6.200
9,000 0.050 0.050
27.000
5.900
3.500
7.350 0.080 0.080
12.500
2.200
2.080
5.200 0.080 0.075
11.000
2.270
1.960
4.100 0.080 0.0 Q

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
DATE
FROM
TO
73/Ob/12
CP ( T) —
73/06/12
73/07/12
CP (1) -
73/07/12
73/09/18
CP(T)—
73/09/18
73/10/12
CP (T) —
73/10/12
73/11/12
CP(T) —
73/11/12
7 3/12/26
CP(T) -
7 3/12/26
74/01/14
CP(T)—
74/01/14
74/02/14
CP(T) —
74/02/14
00630
PTH NO2 NO3
TIME DE N—TOTAL
OF T MG/L
DAY FEE
00 00 1.400
08 00
07 00 0.440
17 00
08 00 0.880
17 00
08 00 0.070
17 00
08 00 0.130
16 00
08 00 1.000
17 00
08 00 0.880
17 00
08 00 2.520
17 00
P002800
4 S11YA TF4 S1 IYA
35 06 23.0 081 20 25.0 4
CLOVER #2
45 15 CLOVER
T/CATAWc A LAKE 030891
CALABASH CREEK
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00665 50051 50053
PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
RATE FLOW—MGD
MG/L i INST HGD MONTHLY
5.000
9.700
8.60 0
12. 00 0
12 • 500
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/I
10. 500
12. 000
8.700
27. 000
24. 000
8.500
6.400
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/I
5.020
4.400
4.60 0
15. 800
10 .000
4.800
3.840
2.520
00671
PHOS—DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
4.220
8.900
7.620
10.400
12. 000
4.100
5.040
3.100
0.200
0.075
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.075
0.175
0.200
0.200
6.400
4 • 500

-------
STU ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
45 11LA AS45 I IZA
35 20 50.0 081 05 57.0 4
S EANLEY
‘.5 250 CrIARLOTTE
T/LAKE WYLIE
MAUNEY CREEK
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET OEPTt
P0 02300D
030891
2141204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
03665
5O0 1
50053
DATE
TIME
UEPT -4
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
P -iOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FLON
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—P4GD
It)
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/I
M3/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MGD
MONThLY
73/ 2/13
11
30
9.800
6.800
0.200
6.600
7.900
0.650
0.650
74/01/03
11
30
9.000
4.950
0.080
5.300
5.700
0.630
0.650
74/01/25
09
30
12.600
5.600
0.130
7.700
8.100
0.650
0.650
74/Od/14
13
20
3.6d0
8.600
2.400
4.600
7.200
0.640
0.650
74/03/08
09
00
1.400
13.000
3.300
6.800
9.100
0.640
0.650
74/03/28
11
10
7.800
8.400
0.470
5.000
7.700
0.630
0.650
74/04/18
08
30
11.000
5.000
0.260
4.500
6.500
0.640
0.650
74/05/09
11
00
10.600
7.550
0.410
6.100
7.800
0.oSO
0.650
74/06/03
14
15
14.000
7.800
1.200
8.500
10.000
0.650
0.650
74/06/21
09
45
11.800
6.200
0.100
7.450
8.800
0.860
0.650
74/07/29
13
35
11.800
4.300
0.270
6.100
7.000
0.750
0.650
74/UB/Ol
13
40
10.100
4.000
0.091
6.600
7.700
1.100
0.750
74/Oh/21
09
15
10.900
7.000
0.050K
5.200
6.700
1.000
0.800
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------