U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                    WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                        REPORT
                                         ON
                                     BARKLEYLAKE
                              STEWART AND KWTGQFERY COUNTIES
                                 TRIGG AND LYON COUNTIES
                                      KENTUCKY
                                     EPA REGION IV
                                 WORKING PAPER No,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                             and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
 699-440

-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword
List of Study Lakes - Tennessee iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 14
V. Literature Revie d 21
VI. Appendices 22

-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, Its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
plannin9 [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
L 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by
lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and to augment plans implementation by the
states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Tennessee Department
of Public Health for professional involvement, to the Tennessee
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase
of the Survey, and to those Tennessee wastewater treatment
plant operators who provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Quality Control, Tennessee
Department of Public Health; the Division of Environmental
Planning, Tennessee Valley Authority; and the Nashville District
Corps of Engineers provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General William C. Smith, former Adjutant General
of Tennessee, and Project Officer Colonel Wilburn C. Johnson,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Tennessee National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.

-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
LAKE NAME
Bark ley
Boone
Cheatham
Cherokee
Chi ckamauga
Doug 1 as
Fort Loudon
Great Falls
Ni c k aj a c k
Old Hickory
Percy Priest
Reel foot
South Hoiston
urns Ford
Watts Bar
COUNTY
Stewart, Montgomery
(Trigg, Lyon in KY)
Washington, Sullivan,
Carter
Cheatham, Davidson
Jefferson, Hamblen,
Grainger, Hawkins
Hamilton, Rhea, Meigs,
McMinn
Sevier, Jefferson, Cocke
Loudon, Knox, Blount
White, Van Buren
Marion, Hamilton
Sumner, Davidson, Wilson,
Smith, Trousdale
Davidson, Rutherford
Obion
Sullivan (Washington in
VA)
Moore, Franklin
Rhea, Meigs, Cumberland,
Roane, Loudon
Franklin, Coffee
Woods (Elk River)

-------
LAKE BARKLEY
0 Tributary Spllng Site
X Lake Sau 1ing Site
Sewage Treatment Facility (SIP)
2 PKL
Murroy
KENTUCKY
TENNESSEE
Nap Location

-------
REPORT ON BARKLEY LAKE, TENNESSEE
STORET NO. 4701
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Survey data indicate Barkley Lake is eutrophic,
i.e., nutrient rich and highly productive. Whether
such nutrient enrichment is to be considered beneficial
or deleterious is determined by its actual or potential
impact upon designated beneficial water uses of each
lake.
Nutrient levels were high; of the 16 Tennessee lakes
surveyed in 1973, 13 had less mean total phosphorus, 13
had less mean orthophosphorus, and 9 had less mean inor-
ganic nitrogen than Barkley Lake. The mean chlorophyll a
concentration was 12.9 pg/l, with a low of 2.8 g/l in
the fall and a high of 29.1 pg/i in the spring. Potential
for primary productivity as measured by algal assay control
yield was high, and Secchi disc visibility was low. Survey
limnologists did not report any visible aquatic nuisance
conditions.
*See Appendix E.

-------
2
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate near colimitation by avail-
able orthophosphorus and inorganic nitrogen levels in Barkley
Lake. Spikes with both nutrients produced moderate increases
in assay yield. Nitrogen to phosphorus (NIP) ratios in lake
data ranged from 5/1 to 11/1, suggesting that nitrogen exerted
primary limitation.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
During the sampling year, the mean annual phosphorus
load from point sources identified within 40 stream-km
(25 miles) was estimated to be 3.4% of the total load
reaching Barkley Lake. The city of Clarksville and the
Ft. Campbell Military Reservation were each estimated to
contribute 1.2% of the total load. Fifteen other smaller
municipal plants contributed the remaining load.
Loading calculations based upon available nutrient
concentrations and flow data yield a net export of both
nitrogen and phosphorus from Barkley Lake. This apparent
export could be due to the absence of the loading data for
treated industrial discharges at Dover, to other undetected
municipal or industrial sources discharging to the lake,
and/or failure to accurately depict loadings from a number
of the known sewage treatment plants with available estima-
tion means.

-------
3
As it is, the measured phosphorus surface loading
of 17.19 g Pfm 2 /yr is seven times higher than-the eu-
trophic” load proposed by Vollenweider (1975). Although
Vollenweider’s model may not be applicable to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times (16 days for Barkley Lake),
elimination of the known point sources directly impacting
Barkley Lake would not reduce phosphorus loading suffi-
ciently to cause a significant improvement in the lake’s
trophic condition.
2. !ionpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load not attributable to
nearby point sources was about 96.6% of the total reaching
the lake. Measured tributaries accounted for approximately
96.0% of the total phosphorus load, and the urigaged drain-
age area was estimated to have contributed 0.5%.
The Cumberland River contributed 74.1% of this “non-
point’ load to Barkley Lake. Studies of upstream Cumber-
land River reservoirs (National Eutrophication Survey
Working Paper No. 444) reveal a number of large point
sources not considered in the nutrient budget to Barkley
Lake, the most significant of these from the city of Nash-
ville. An evaluation of the nutrient control requirements
for the upstream Cumberland River reservoirs is needed be-
fore a nutrient budget or control strategy can be defined
for Barkley Lake.

-------
4
Nonpoint nutrient exports for Unnamed Stream, B(1),
Eddy Creek, C(1), and Little River, E(1), were inordi-
nately higher than those observed for the other tribu-
taries entering Barkley Lake (see Section IV-D). For
example, if the mean nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /yr, of
representative unimpacted tributaries (see page i )
were multiplied by the drainage area of Unnamed Stream,
B(l), an estimated annual phosphorus loading of 110 kg
P/yr for tributary B(l) would be obtained rather than the
observed value of 45,560 kg P/yr. This discrepancy may
be attributable to unknown point sources impacting the
tributary or to sampling error. Additional sampling and
analyses of the tributary watershed are necessary to deter-
mine if those excessive loading values are real, and if so,
how to account for them.

-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized
below. Lake surface area, volume, and hydraulic retention
time were provided by the Nashville District Corps of Engi-
neers; lake mean and maximum depths were provided by the
Tennessee Department of Public Health, Division of Water
Quality Control; tributary flow data and drainage area were
provided by the Tennessee District Office of the U.S. Geo-
logical Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes the
lake surface area. Mean hydraulic retention time was ob-
tained by dividing the lake volume by mean flow of the out-
let. Tributary drainage areas plus the lake surface area do
not equal the outlet drainage area probably because of dif-
ferences in pool elevation used by the different sources in
their calculations. Precipitation values are estimated by
methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES)
Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions
is included in Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 234.40 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 4.6 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 21.0 meters.
4. Volume: 1,071.900 x m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 16 days.

-------
6
B. Tributary and Outlet (see Appendix B for flow data):
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean Flow
Name area(km 2 ) jni 3 fsec )
A(2) Cumberland River 37,389.2 620.04
B(l) Unnamed Stream 8.4 0.11
C(l) Eddy Creek 193.0 2.65
0(1) Muddy Fork Little River 339.3 4.93
E(l) Little River 1,098.2 16.02
F(l Donaldson Creek 45.3 0.66
G(l Saline Creek 112.4 1.64
H(l) Dyers Creek 46.9 0.68
J(l) Ferry Cross Creek 50.5 0.71
K(1) Blooming Grove Creek 79.0 1.11
L(l) Red River 3,768.4 48.02
N(1) Budds Creek 59.8 0.84
P(1) Yellow Creek 432.5 6.07
Q(l) Wells Creek 144.3 2.02
R(1) South Cross Creek 34.7 0.49
S(l) Long Creek 48.2 0.68
1(1) Lick Creek 35.7 0.50
U(1) Bear Creek 42.7 0.60
V(1) Canal — 164.77
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 1,414.1 20.30
Totals 45,342.6 892.84
2. Outlet -
A(1) Cumberland River 45,578.8 984.95
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 136.2 cm.
2. Mean annual: 120.1 cm.

-------
7
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Barkley Lake was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. The first time, samples for physical and chemical
parameters were collected from 10 stations on the lake and
from a number of depths at each station (see map, page v).
The second time, only Stations 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 were
sampled. The third time, only Stations 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9
were sampled. During each visit, depth-integrated samples
were collected from each sampling station for chlorophyll a
analysis and phytoplankton identification and enumeration.
During the first visit, three 18.9-liter depth-integrated
samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum depths
(expressed in meters) sampled are listed below:
Station Maximum
Number Depth
1 21.3
2 19.8
3 19.5
4 20.7
5 18.0
6. 16.8
7 15.2
8 15.2
9 16.8
10 10.7
For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES
Working Paper No. 175.

-------
8
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in 111-A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton
counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in Ill-B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in Ill-C.

-------
RANGE RANGE
PARAMETER N 0 RANGE MEDIAN (METERS) N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
* N = NO. OF SAMPLES
* MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
5 = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
LAKE BARIcLEY
STORET CODE 4701 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
5/16/73 ) ( 8/14/73
MAX
S° ° = 10 DEPTH S°° = 6
10/20/73
DEPTH S•°° = 5
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
TEMPERATURE (DEG CENT)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH** 10
17.3— 32.0
18.1— 20.0
22.0
19.1
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
18.0— 36.0
24.9— 27.7
27.5
25.8
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
20.0— 29.0
21.1— 24.1
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (MG/L)
O.-1.5 H DEPTH 3
MAX DEPTHO* 9
9.3— 10.8
8.9— 12.7
9.5
9.6
1.2— 1.5
9.1— 20.7
6
6
6.0— 7.0
5.9— 6.3
6.4
6.2
1.5— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
3
5
5.8— 6.8
5.0— 7.2
CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH 0 ° 10
192.— 225.
199.— 220.
220.
214.
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
163.— 178.
164.— 174.
172.
171.
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
166.— 184.
165.— 182.
Pi i (STANDARD UNITS)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTP1 0 0 10
7.7— 8.5
7.7— 8.3
8.0
7.8
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
7.1— 8.3
7.1— 7.7
7.2
7.2
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
7.2— 7.4
7.1— 7.8
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/I)
O.—1,5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH 0 10
72.— 98.
72.— 98.
85.
85.
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
61.— 67.
62.— 67.
65.
65.
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
S
54.— 62.
54.— 60.
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.—I.5 M DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH° 10
0.085—0.155
0.118—0.300
0.124
0.135
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
0.086—0.164
0.132—0.167
0.126
0.149
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
0.105—0.162
0.135—0.17’.
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/L)
0.—1.5 N DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH 10
0.027—0.054
0.030—0.050
0.043
0.041
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
0.031—0.083
0.033—0.070
0.059
0.045
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
0.053—0.101
0.045—0.089
N02 .N03 (MG/U
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH° 10
0.290—0.460
0.260—0.510
0.430
0.430
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
0.140—0.450
0.150—0.460
0.355
0.355
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
0.340—0.600
0.360—0.530
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH** 10
0.040—0.070
0.030—0.060
0.050
0.055
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
0.070—0.170
0.100—0.160
0.135
0.130
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
0.040—0.150
0.050—0.150
KJELDAHL N (HG/L)
O.—1.5 M DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTHOO 10
0.200—0.600
0.200—0.500
0.400
0.300
0.0— 1.5
0.0— 20.7
12
6
0.200—0.800
0.200—0.400
0.450
0.400
0.0— 1.5
10.7— 21.3
9
5
0.200—0.600
0.200—0.400
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
0
D0D** 0 *o
0*000
0
*0*0*
21.4
12.2—
18.0
5.8
1.5—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
172.
172.
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
7.3
7.3
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
57.
56.
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
0.128
0.149
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
0.062
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
0.420
0.420
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
0.050
0.050
0.0—
12.2—
1.5
18.0
0.0—
1.5

-------
10
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Algal
Sampling Dominant Units
Date Genera per ml
05/16-17/73 1. Melosira 12,364
2. Flagellates 1,273
3. Cyclotella 864
4. Stephanodiscus 182
5. Dinoflagellates 136
Other genera 378
Total 15,197
08/14/73 1. Melosira 3,700
2. Oscillatoria 727
3. Cyclotella 341
4. Raphidiopsis 318
5. Cryptomonas 227
Other genera 1 ,O44
Total 6,357
10/20/73 1. Melosira 1,713
2. Flagellates 1,022
3. Stephanodiscus 299
4. Cryptomonas 126
5. Oscillatoria 94
Other genera 487
Total 3,741

-------
11
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number micrograms/liter )
05/16/73 1 27.3
2 29.1
3 28.4
4 13.0
5 18.5
05/17/73 6 17.0
7 12.4
8 10.0
9 9.4
10 10.3
08/14/73 1 17.1
2 23.3
3
4 13.9
5
6 5.2
7
8 3.2
9
10 4.9
10/20/73 1 4.5
2
3 9.7
4
5 5.5
6
7 2.8
8
9 5.0
10

-------
12
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/i )
Ortho P
Conc . (mg/i )
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
Maximum Yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
Spike (mg/i )
Ortho P
Conc . (mg/i )
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
Maximum Yield
( rng/i-dry wt. )
Control
0.05 p
0.05 p +
1.00 N
1.0 N
M
M
M
M
0.348
0.348
1.348
1.348
8.7
10.1
23.3
13.8
Stations
5, 6,
7, and
8;
Control
0.05 p
0.05 P +
1.00 N
1.0 N
0.044
0.094
0.094
0.044
•
0.628
0.628
1.628
1.628
7.1
10.3
19.0
12.3
Stations
9 and
10;
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P +
1.00 N
1.0 N
0.032
0.082
0.082
0.032
0.604
0.604
1.604
1.604
3.3
5.0
8.0
5.0
2. Filtered and nutrient spiked
Control
0.035
0.435
8.4
0.05
P
0.085
0.435
10.9
0.05
P + 1.0
N
0.085
1.435
29.1
1.00
N
0.035
1.435
9.4
M = missing.

-------
13
3. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum
capricornutum , indicate that the potential for primary
production in Barkley Lake was high at the time of
sampling. Moderate response accompanied the addition
of both nitrogen and phosphorus alone, suggesting the
lake is very nearly colimited by the two nutrients.
The simultaneous addition of nitrogen and phosphorus
spikes resulted in maximum yield.
Mean lake N/P ratios of 11/1, 8/1, and 8/1 for the
first, second, and third samplings, respectively, indi-
cate nitrogen was the primary limiting nutrient at the
time of sampling. A ratio of 14/1 or more is generally
necessary to ascribe clear-cut phosphorus limitation.

-------
14
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Tennessee
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v),
except for the high runoff month of February when two samples
were collected. Sampling was begun in April 1973 and was
completed in March 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates
for the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year
were provided by the Tennessee District Office of the USGS for
the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries,
except Barkley Canal (4701 Vl), were determined by using a
modification of a USGS computer program for calculating stream
loadings. Nutrient loading estimates for Barkley Canal (Station
Vi) were derived by multiplying the mean normalized flow by the
mean annual concentration. The mean annual concentration was
obtained from the values observed at Station 2104 Al (Kentucky
Lake) and Station 4701 Vi (Barkley Lake). Concentrations for
each sampling date are shown in Appendix D. Nutrient loads
indicated for tributaries are those measured minus point source
loads, if any.

-------
15
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and
immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS) were estimated by using
the means of the nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /yr, for Ferry Cross
Creek, Budds Creek, Yellow Creek, South Cross Creek, and Long
Creek at Stations J(l), N(l), P(l), R(l), and 5(1), and multi-
plying the means by the “ZZ” area in km 2 .
The operators of the Princeton, Cadiz, and Kuttawa waste-
water treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and
corresponding flow data. Nutrient loads for the cities of
Eddyville, Cumberland City, Clarksville (three plants), Hop-
kinsville, Ft. Campbell, Springfield, Erin, and Dover waste-
water treatment plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401
kg N/capita/yr. Nutrient loads for the Montgomery Elementary
and Central High Schools, the St. Bethlehem Elementary School,
and Woodlawn Elementary School were estimated at 0.567 kg P and
1.701 kg N/capita/yr (covers 180 days).

-------
16
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Population rlean Flow Receiving
Served* Treatnient* ( m 3 /d x 103) Water
Eddyville (Kentucky) 900 1. 0.341** Hamond Creek
Princeton (Kentucky) 5,620 1. 2 123 Eddy Creek
Cadiz (Kentucky) 1,980 2. 0.364 Little River
Kuttawa (Kentucky) 635 2. 0 304 Poplar Creek
Cumberland City 850 3. 0 322** Cumberland River
Main (Clarksville) 28,500 2. l0.787** Cumberland River
Providence 9,000 1 . 3.406** Ringgold Creek
(Clarksvil le)
Edgoten (Clarksville) 4,000 2 1 514** Little Uest Fork
Dover 1,650 2. 0 624** Cumberland River
Hopkinsville 23,000 1. 8 706** Little River
(Kentucky)
Ft. Campbell Military 42,000 4. 15.897** Little West Fork
Reservation (Kentucky) Creek
Springfield 10,500 1. 6.662 Sulfur Fork Creek!
Red River
Erin 1,200 5 0.651 Wells Creek
Montgomery Elementary 895 6. 0 339** Big McAdoo Creek
School
Montgomery Central 936 6. 0.354** Sulfur Sprinq Creek
High School
St. Bethlehem 776 6. 0 4** Red River
Elementary School
Woodlawn Elementary 701 6. 0.265** Bartee Brook!
School Blooming Grove Creek
2 Known industrial -
Mean Flow Receiving
Name Product Treatment ( m 3 /d x i0 3 ) Uater
Dover Aluminum 2. unknown Cumberland River
1ain (Clarksville) neat Packing 2. 3.028 Cumberland River
wastes from
Frosty Morn
slant
Key: 1. Tnckling fflter
2. Activated sludge
3. Stabilization pond
4 Tertiary
5. Contact aerators
6. Extended aeration
*Treatment plant questionnaires, U.S.EPA, 1971, and/or Tennessee Department of Public Health, 1975.
at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.

-------
17
B Annual Total Phosphorus Loading — Average Year.
Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a Tributaries (nonpoint load) —
A(2) Cumberland River 2,984,155 74.1
B(l) Unnamed Strean 45,560 1.1
C(l) Eddy Creek 22,880 0.6
D(l) Muddy Fork Little River 10,240 0 3
E(l) Little River 88,605 2.2
F(l) Donaldson Creek 350 <0.1
G(1) Saline Creek 3,400 0 1
H(l) Dyers Creek 260 <0.1
J(l) Ferry Cross Creek 345 <0.1
K(l) Blooming Grove Creek 2,060 0 1
L(l) Red River 161,490 4.0
N(l) Budds Creek 845 <0.1
P(l) Yellow Creek 11,075 0.3
Q(l) Wells Creek 2,200 0 1
R(l) South Cross Creek 345 <0 1
S(l) Long Creek 510 <0.1
1(1) Lick Creek 325 <0 1
U(l) Bear Creek 190 <0.1
V(l) Canal 519,620 12.9
b. tlinor tnbutaries and imediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 18,385 0.5
c. Known municipal SIPs —
Eddyville (Kentucky 1,020 <0 1
Princeton (Kentucky 8,095 0.2
Cadiz (Kentucky) 2,130 0.1
Kuttawa (Kentucky) 1,530 <0.1
Cumberland City (Kentucky) 96 <0.1
Main (Clarksville) 32,320 0 8
Providence (Clarksville) 10,205 0 3
Edgoten (Clarksville) 4,535 0.1
Dover 1,870 <0.1
Hopkinsville 26,080 0.6
Ft. Campbell 47,630 1.2
Springfield 11,905 0.3
Erin 1,360 <0.1
Montgomery Elementary School 505 <0.1
Montgomery Central High 530 <0.1
School
St. Bethlehem Elementary 440 <0.1
School
Woodlawn Elementary School 395 <0 1
d. Septic tanks* - 85 <0.1
e Known industrial -
Dover unknown
Main (Clarksville) unknown
f. Direct precipitation** - 4,100 0.1
Totals 4,028,540 100.0
2 Output - A(l) Cumberland River 4,209,050
3 Net annual P export*** - 180,510
*Estlmate based on 300 lakeside residences.
**Estlmated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Calculated export probably due to unknown nutrient sources and/or
nonrepresentative sampling

-------
18
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year
1. InputS -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A(2) Cumberland River 16,819,435 56.1
B(l) Unnamed Stream 67,020 0.2
C(l) Eddy Creek 191,050 0 6
D(l) Muddy Fork Little River 331,875 1.1
E(l) Little River 1,387,600 4 6
F(1) Donaldson Creek 16,385 0 1
G(1) Saline Creek 56,450 0.2
11(1) Dyers Creek 16,485 0.1
J(1) Ferry Cross Creek 18,845 0.1
K(l) Blooming Grove Creek 27,455 0.1
L(1) Red River 3,282,050 11.0
N(1) Budds Creek 17,340 0 1
P(1) Yellow Creek 139,915 0 5
Q(l) Wells Creek 36,835 0.1
R(1) South Cross Creek 9,450 <0 1
S(l) Long Creek 12,840 <0.1
T(l) Lick Creek 6,795 <0.1
U(1) Bear Creek 23,320 0 1
V(1) Canal 6,365,330 21.4
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 431,300 1.4
c Known municipal STP’s —
Eddyville (Kentucky) 3,060 <0.1
Princeton (Kentucky) 14,055 <0.1
Cadiz (Kentucky) 1,830 <0.1
Kuttawa (Kentucky) 2,830 <0.1
Cumberland City (Kentucky) 2,890 <0.1
Main (Clarksville) 96,930 0.3
Providence (Clarksville) 30,610 0.1
Edgoten (Clarksville 13,605 0 1
Dover 5,610 <0.1
Hopkinsville 78,225 0 3
Ft. Campbell 142,840 0 5
Springfield 35,710 0.1
Erin 4,080 <0.1
rlontgoniery Elementary School 1,520 <0 1
1ontgomery Central High 1,590 <0 1
School
St. Bethlehem Elementary 1,320 <0.1
School
Woodlawn Elementary School 1,190 <0 1
d Septic tanks* - 3,195 <0.1
e Known industrial —
Dover unknown
:lain (Clarksville) unknown
f. Direct preclpitation** - 253,060 0.8
Totals 29,951,925 100.0
2 Output — A(l) Cumberland River 32,674,930
3 Net annual N export*** - 2,723,005
*Estimate based on 300 lakeside residences.
**Estirllated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Calcu lated export probably due to unknown nutrient sources
and/or nonrepresentative sampling.

-------
19
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary jçg P/km 2 /yr çg N/km 2 /yr
A 2) Cumberland River 80 450
B 1) Unnamed Stream 5,424* 7,979*
C(1) Eddy Creek 119 990
D(1) Muddy Fork Little River 30 978
E(l) Little River 81 1,264
F(l) Donaldson Creek 8 362
G(l) Saline Creek 30 502
H(l) Dyers Creek 6 351
J(l) Ferry Cross Creek 7 373
K(l Blooming Grove Creek 26 348
L l Red River 43 871
N(l) Budds Creek 14 290
P1 Yellow Creek 26 324
Q 1 Wells Creek 15 255
R(l South Cross Creek 10 272
S(1 Long Creek 10 266
1(1) Lick Creek 9 190
u(i) Bear Creek 4 546
*Background levels greatly inflated, see text.

-------
20
E. Yearly Loadings;
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollen-
weider (1975). Essentially, his “eutrophic” loading is that
at which the receiving waters would become eutrophic or re-
main eutrophic; his “oligotrophic” loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or
becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A “mesotrophic”
loading would be considered one between “eutrophic” and “oh-
gotrophic”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model nay not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times or in which
light penetration is severely restricted from high concentrations
of suspended solids in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m 2 /yr)
Estimated loading for Barkley Lake 17.19
Vollenweider’s “eutrophic” loading 2.02
Vollenweider’s “ohigotrophic” loading 1.01

-------
21
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1975. “Water Quality
Management Plan for the Lower Cumberland River Basin”,
preliminary draft, Division of Water Quality Control, Nash-
ville, Tennessee.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1971. “Inventory of
Wastewater Treatment Facilitias”, Vol. 4. EPA Publication
No. OWP-1, Office of Media Programs, Office of Water Programs,
Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1976. Report on
Cheatharn Reservoir, Old Hickory Reservoir, and 3. Percy
Priest Reservoir. Workthg Paper No. 444. Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory - Las Vegas, Nevada, and
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory - Corva 1is,
Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.

-------
22
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 miles
Meters x 3.281 feet
CubIc meters x 8.107 x l0 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile

-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
TqjBUTAQi FLO ’ INFORMATION FOR TENNESSEE
LAKE CODE 4701
LAKE RARKLEY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 45578.8
NOTE D** SITE 470 1V 12104A1—NEGATIVE NUMBERS ARE FLOWS OUT OF THE LAKE
MEAN MONT’ILY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRI8UTA Y MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3 73 2223.722
4 73 1853.338
5 73 1757.910
6 73 1802.084
7 73 1277.373
8 73 828.551
9 73 461.281
10 73 368.402
11 73 995.620
12 73 2049.856
1 74 3055.388
2 74 2854.338
3 74 1416.692
15 1999.169
5 1684.852
3 1798.120 30 1166.654
26 o90.931
18 311.485
21 170.751
3 1098.694
17 1755.645
26 2358.793
2 2823.190
I 1520.615
TPjr3IJTA) Y
SUB—DRAINAGE
AREA(S PcM)
J FEB
MAR
AP
MAY
NOP IALIZED FLO S(CMS)
JUL StP
OCT
NOV
t) iC
t EAI J
4701u1
47 01A2
470181
470 C1
4701 1)1
4701E1
4701F1
6701G1
4701 1- Il
4701J1
4701’ l
470IL 1
470lN1
47OP L
470101
470 1Q 1
‘701St
470111
470101
47 01V1
4701ZZ
45578.8
37389.2
8.4
193.0
33Q .3
1098.2
45.3
112.4
46.9
50.5
79.0
3768.4
59.8
432.5
144.3
3 ..7
48.2
35.7
42.7
0.0
1414.1
1449.82 1512.12
815.53 1050.55
0.16’ 0.244
4•3f, 5.8)
8.13 10.25
26.28 33.22
1.076 1.359
2.69 3.40
1.121 1.419
0.78 1.30
1.23 2.04
59. 7 99.39
0.93 1.5’
6.71 11.16
2.24 3.71
0.53a 0.895
0.75 1.?4
0.56 0.92
0.66 1.10
339.802 226.252
27.89 39.64
1529.11
1?26.12
0.311
6.99
12.23
39.64
1.642
4.05
1.691
1.84
2.89
130.26
2.18
jS.74
5.24
1.263
1.75
1.30
1.55
218.323
51.54
1084.54
1112.85
0.167
4.08
7.42
24.01
0.991
2.46
1.025
1.18
1.85
107.0’.
1.40
10.11
3.37
0.813
1.13
0.84
1.00
—35.113
32.00
1325.23
599.’.3
0.119
2.66
5.64
18.26
0.765
1.87
0.779
0.86
1.3
52.67
1.02
7.36
2.46
0.592
0.82
0.61
0.73
22.512
23.84
671.11 659.78
390.77 345.’.7
0.051 0.0’.8
1.36 1.1e,
2.83 2.18
9.20 7.08
0.368 0.283
0.95 0.72
0.394 0.303
0.40 0.34
0.63 0.53
27.13 18.55
0.48 0.40
3.45 2.89
1.15 0.96
0.277 0.231
0.39 0.32
0.29 0.24
0.34 0.29
67.960 113.551
11.61 9.29
719.25 515.37
325.64 255.98
0.020 0.014
0.59 0.42
1.42 1.33
4.59 4.33
0.190 0.178
0.47 0.44
0.195 0.185
0.30 0.17
0.48 0.27
11.95 6.60
0.36 0.20
2.60 1.47
0.87 0.49
0.209 0.118
0.29 0.16
0.21 0.12
0.26 0.1’.
154.327 126.293
7.11 5.27
498.38
237.30
0.011
0.28
0.62
2.01
0.082
0.21
0.087
0.14
0.22
6.99
0.17
1.23
0.41
0.099
0.14
0.10
0.12
198.218
3.40
702.26
362.46
0.057
1.33
2.58
8.33
0.340
0.85
0.354
0.41
0.64
11.13
0.48
3.51
1.17
0.281
0.39
0.29
0.35
280.053
11.16
1172.32
648.46
0.125
2.92
4.90
16.34
0.680
1.67
0.697
0.81
1.27
48.70
0.96
6.94
2.32
0.558
0.77
0.57
0.69
263.913
22.00
984.95
620.04
0.110
2.65
4.93
16.02
0.659
1.64
0.684
0.71
1.11
48.02
0.84
6.07
2.02
0.487
0.68
0.50
0.60
164.769
20.30
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE
AREA OF
LAKE =
AREAS =
45578.8
45342.7
TOTAL FLOW IN = 10749.79
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 11839.26
4701 Al
17
17
2208.714
1039.228

-------
1 !6UT4RY FLOW INFO MATIOr1 FO TENNESSEE 09/13/76
LAcE CODE 47 ’1 LAKE BAPKLEY
4EAN MONT -iL( FLOWS AND JAILY FLOWS(CP4S)
TRIBUTARY .AONTil YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
‘.7 01A2 6 73 1466.812 14 1192.139
S 73 1254.436 6 1010.911
6 73 1172.317 1 934.456
7 73 756.060 1 1019.406
8 73 470.060 26 404.931
9 73 226.025 18 149.513
10 73 276.939 20 251.170
11 73 676.772 2 475.723
12 73 1291.248 18 741.901
74 2916.635 26 2480.556
2 74 2021.823 3 2738.239 16 1622.555
3 74 1214.793 3 733.406 16 988.258
‘70it 1 3 73 0.368
4 73 0.340 14 0.142
5 73 0.221 5 0.280
6 73 0.096 3 0.102 30 0.096
7 73 0.054
8 73 0.017 26 0.008
9 73 0.006 18 0.Oflô
10 73 0.011 21 0.008
11 73 0.207 3 0.020
12 73 0.193 17 0.079
1 74 0.453 26 0.212
2 74 0.210 3 0.453 17 0.113
3 74 0.224 1 0.150 17 0.311
‘.70 1C1 3 73 8.042
4 73 8.438 15 3.285
5 73 4.927 5 6.258
6 73 2.577 3 2.747 30 2.549
7 73 1.303
8 73 0.538 26 0.311
9 73 0.193 18 0.173
10 73 0.311 21 0.227
11 73 4.870 3 0.425
12 73 4.502 17 1.869
1 74 12.346 26 5.805
2 74 5.017 2 7.136 17 2.718
3 7 . 5.012
470101 3 73 14.073
6 73 15.348 14 6.456
5 73 10.421 5 13.224
6 73 S.35 3 5.720 30 5.295
7 73 2.435
8 73 1.303 26 0.736
73 0.595 18 0.566
10 73 0.650 21
11 73 9.430 3 0.850
12 73 7.759 17 3.200
1 74 23.022 26 10.845
2 74 8.835 2 12.544 17 4.786
3 7’. 8.750 1 5.805 17 12.374

-------
TRIBUTARY FLO . INF0 IATION FUR TENNESSEE 0/13 176
LAC.E CODE ‘701 LAI E BARPcLEY
MC r’1 MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLCJ S(CNS)
T IE4U1ARY MONT -I YEAH MEAN FLO.I DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLO .
‘7 01E 1 - 73 45.307
4 73 49.838 1’. 20.926
5 73 33.697 5 42.758
6 73 17.387 3 18.604 30 17.217
7 73 7 .92q
8 73 .191 26 2.379
9 73 1.982 18 1.7 84
10 73 2.180 21 1.5’36
11 73 30.582 3 2.747
12 73 25.202 17 10.421
74 74.473 26 35.113
2’ 74 28.600 40.776 17 (5.574
3 74 28.317 1 18.859 17 40.210
4731F1 3 73 1.897
4 73 2.039 14 0.850
5 73 (•4lF 5 1.812
6 73 0.708 3 0.765 30 0.708
7 73 0.311
8 73 0.173 26 0.099
9 73 0,079 18 0.071
10 73 0.088 21 0.062
11 73 1.246 / 3 0.113
I? 73 (.048 17 0.425
1 74 3.058 26 1.444
2 74 1.161 2 1.642 17 0.623
3 74 1.189 1 0.793 17 1.671
47 01G1 4 73 5.097 14 2.138
5 73 3.455 6 3.766
6 73 1.781 2 2.149 30 (7.556
7 73 0.810
8 73 0.430 25 0.246
9 73 0.195 18 0.184
10 73 20.043 20 0.173
1! 73 3.115 3 0.283
12 73 2.580 (7 1.070
1 74 7.617 26 3.596
74 2.945 3 6.343 15 1.758
3 74 2.888 3 1.733 16 3.908
470 (’l l 4 73 2.121 14 0.892
5 73 1.444 6 1.569
73 0.74? 2 0.898 30 0.733
7 73 0.337
8 73 0.178 25 0.102
9 73 0.08? 18 0.076
10 73 0.093 20 0.071
ii 73 1.303 3 0.119
1? 73 1.076 17 0,445
1 74 3.171 26 1.498
2 76 1.226 3 2.645 15 0.733
3 74 1.209 3 0.722 16 1.625

-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW LNFO MATEON FO rENNESSEE
09/13/76
LAKE CODE 470) LAtcE BARKLEY
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLQ UAY FLOW
4701J1 4 73 1. 7 Sb 14 0.8 3
5 73 1.325 6 1.552
6 73 0.541 2 0.807 30 0.309
7 73 0.221
8 73 0.164 25 0.348
9 73 0.176 18 0.181
10 73 0.161 20 0.150
11 73 1.795 2 0.187
12 73 0.844 17 0.286
1 74 3.823 26 1.175
2 74 1.000 3 1.390 15 0.779
3 74 1.348 3 0.943 16 1.186
470 )K1 5 73 2.073
6 73 0.847 30 0.484
7 73 0.345
8 73 0.261 25 0.544
9 73 0.278 18 0.286
10 73 0.249 20 0.23?
11 73 2.806 2 0.294
12 73 1.322 17 0.450
1 74 5.975 26 1.841
2 74 1.563 3 2.178 15 1.218
3 74 2.107
4701L1 4 73 139.036 14 75.323
5 73 96.560 6 119.497
6 73 42.192 1 62.297
7 73 28.600 26 67.677
8 73 17.726 25 9.883
9 73 7.815 18 7.815
10 73 5.777 20 4.531
11 73 89.764 3 6.994
12 73 71.358 17 26.788
1 74 263.630 26 107.604
2 74 94.861 3 167.636 16 56.917
3 74 86.083 3 58.899 16 72.491
4701N1 4 73 2.081 14 1.048
5 73 1.569 6 1.838
6 73 0.640 2 0.954
7 73 0.261 1 0.345
8 73 0.195 25 0.413
9 73 0.210 17 0.224
10 73 0.190 20 0.176
11 73 2.118 2 0.224
12 73 1.000 18 0.328
I 74 4.531 26 1.393
2 74 1.184 3 1.648
3 74 1.597 3 1.119 16 1.399

-------
TRI8UTARr FLO. 1t. FO 1’1AT1ON FOR TENNESSEL 04/13/76
LAKE CODE 7’U L’ EtAi r LEY
M(AN Ml)NTHLY LOr S AND JA1L FLOWS(CMS)
T 1F4UTAPY MONT.. YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW OA FLOW Day FLOW
73 15.036 14 7.561
5 73 11.355 6 13.281
6 73 6.644 2 6.909
7 73 1.892 1 2.506
8 73 1.419 25 2.973
q 73 1.512 17 1.608
10 73 1.371 20 1.277
ii 73 15.319 2 1.608
12 73 7.249 18 2.364
74 32.848 27 10.109
2 74 8.552 3 11.921 15 6.654
3 74 11.525 3 .O99 16 10.109
4 73 5.012 14 2.523
5 73 3.794 6 4.446
6 73 1.546 2 2.302
7 73 0.631 1 0.835
8 73 0.473 25 0.994
9 73 0.504 17 0.535
10 73 0.459 20 0.425
11 73 5.097 3 0.521
17 73 2.413 18 0.787
1 74 10.930 27 3.370
‘ 74 2.860 3 3.964 15 2.223
3 74 3.851 3 2.696 16 3.370
47U1 1 4 73 1.206 14 0.606
5 73 0.912 6 1.068
6 73 0.371 2 0.555
7 73 0.153 1 0.201
8 73 0.113 25 0.238
9 73 0.122 17 0.130
10 73 0.110 20 0.102
ii 73 1.229 2 0.130
1? 73 0.580 18 0.190
7’. 2.631 27 0.813
2 74 0.688 3 0.957 15 0.535
3 74 0.926 3 0.64 lb 0.d13
470 1S1 to 73 1.674 14 0.844
5 73 1.263 6 1.481
6 73 0.515 2 0.773
7 73 0.210 1 0.280
8 73 0.159 25 0.331
9 73 0.170 17 0.178
10 73 0.153 20 0.142
I i 73 1.708 3 0.173
12 73 0.837 18 0.263
1 74 3.653 27 1.127
2 74 0.954 3 1.328 15 0.742
3 74 1.286 3 0.900 16 1.127

-------
T’ 18UTAR FLO INFO MAT1UN FOR TENNESSEE 0 /1J/76
LAcE CODE ‘ .701 LA.cE ARi LEY
MEAN MONT 4L,’ FLOv 5 AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
IRIfiUTARY 4ONTP-1 YLAk MEAN FLOW DAY FLfl DAY ILOW DAY FLOW
470111 4 73 1.2’.1 14
5 73 0.937 6 1.099
6 73 0.38? 2 0.569
7 73 0.156 1 0.207
8 73 0.116 25 0.246
9 73 0.125 17 0.133
10 73 0.113 20 0.105
ii 73 1.266 2 0.133
12 73 0.597 18 0.195
1 74 2.707 27 0.835
2 74 0.708 3 0.985 15 0.552
3 74 0.954 3 0.668 16 0. 35
470101 4 73 1.487 14
5 73 1.121 5 1.645
6 73 0.459 15 0.439 30 0.261
7 73 0.187
8 73 0.14? 25 0.0
9 73 0.150 17 0.0
10 73 0.136 21 0.0
11 73 1.515 3 0.0
12 73 0.714 18 0.235
1 74 3.2?B 27 1.000
2 74 0.847 2 1.172 15 0.660 17 0.620
3 74 1.141 1 0.878 17 1.195
4701V1 4 73 —36.81? 14 —12.176
5 73 148.380 5 210.111
6 73 317.149 3 1027.901 30 —336.970
7 73 215.774
8 73 221.438 25 368.119
9 73 198.218 18 220.305
10 73 88.349 21 —45.307
11 73 286.000 3 481.3d 6
12 73 410.594 18 753.228
1 7’. —122.895 27 141.018
2 74 330.458 2 —120.063 17 342.634
3 74 ?02.494 1 399.267 17 220.022
470111 4 73 53.80?
5 73 38.228
6 73 17.896
7 73 7.759
8 73 7.192
9 73 3.5 11
10 73 3.511
11 73 42.415
I? 73 26.703
1 7. 96.277
2 74 30.865
3 74 35.113

-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STORET ET’flEVAL DATE 7b/09/ IO
470101
37 00 35.0 088 13 05.0 3
LAKE ARKLEY
21143 TENNESSEE
05209?
I 1E?ALES
0069 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/16 10 iS 0000
10 15 0006
10 15 0015
10 15 0040
10 15 0065
73/08/14 13 10 0000
13 tO 0005
13 10 0025
13 10 0050
13 10 0070
73/10/20 10 30 0000
10 30 0005
10 30 0015
10 30 0025
10 30 0045
10 30 0058
0 • 102
0 .088
0.122
0.105
0 • 143
o .086
0 • 10
0 • 142
0.142
o • 1 32
o • 113
0 • 105
0 • 10’?
0.11g.
0.146
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTPI
OF
DAY FEET
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
19.6
19.4
19.4
19.4
28.0
27.9
27.9
27.7
27.7
21.4
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.2
21.1
73/05/16 10 15 0000
10 15 0006
10 15 0015
10 15 0040
10 15 O 16S
73/08/14 13 10 0000
13 10 0005
13 10 0025
13 10 0050
13 10 0070
73/10/20 10 30 0000
10 30 0005
10 30 0015
10 30 0025
10 30 0045
10 30 0058
00300 00077
DO TRANSP
SECCHI
MGfL INCHES
10.2
10.0
10.2
10.1
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.2
00094
00400
00410
P’-IOS—OIS
CNDUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NI-13-N
TOT KJEL
N02 NO3
FIEL1
CACOJ
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
MIC OMHO
SO
MG/L
M0/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
32
225
8.00
98
0.050
0.500
0.340
0.035
220
8.10
98
0.040
0.300
0.340
0.033
220
8.20
98
0.040
0.300
0.340
220
8.20
99
0.030
0.300
0.350
0.035
220
8.10
98
0.040
0.400
0.350
36
163
8.30
62
0.100
0.600
0.140
0.033
167
8.00
61
0.090
0.400
0.140
165
7.90
61
0.110
0.500
0.150
0.034
1o8
7.80
61
0.110
0.500
0.150
168
7.70
63
0.100
0.400
0.150
0.033
28
169
7.40
56
0.060
0.500
0.600
0.056
169
7.30
54
0.040
0.200K
0.600
169
7.30
53
0.040
0.200K
0.580
0.051
168
7.30
53
0.040
0.200K
0.570
0.048
166
7.30
53
0.040
0.200K
0.560
DATE
FR ON
TO
TIME
OF
DAY
00665 32217
DEPTH Pp1OS-TOT CHLRPHYL
A
FEET MG/L P (JG/L
27.3
17.1
“.5
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS TrIAN INDICJ TEO

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/09/10
470102
37 (,2 26.0 088 07 3 ,.0 3
LA cE HARKLEY
21143 TENNESSEE
052092
1 1EP LES
0040 FEET
21 11202
DEPTII CLASS 00
73/05/16 12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 5 0015
12 45 0025
12 45 0035
73/08/14 13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0025
13 55 0050
13 55 0065
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.118
0.124
0 • 100
0.107
0.118
0.118
0.112
0.113
0.133
0.146
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROrI
OF
TO
DAY FEET
73/05/16
12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 45 0015
12 45 0025
12 45 0035
73/08/1’.
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0025
13 55 0050
13 55 0065
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY FEET
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOJCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT (JEL
NO2bNO3
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
F1ELI)
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
m 4G/L
INCHES
M1C OMHO
SLI
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
19.5
28
225
8.20
98
0.040
0.500
0.360
0.041
19.6
10.1
225
8.10
99
0.040
0.300
0.360
0.035
19.5
10.0
220
8.10
97
0.040
0.200
0.360
0.035
19.5
9.9
225
8.10
97
0.040
0.200
0.360
0.034
19.5
10.0
220
8.20
97
0.040
0.300
0.370
0.036
27.2
34
178
7.80
64
0.080
0.600
0.200
0.037
27.1
7.0
178
7.70
65
0.070
0.500
0.210
0.039
27.0
6.7
176
7.60
64
0.080
0.400
0.220
0.044
26.9
6.4
174
7.50
65
0.110
0.400
0.240
0.040
26.9
6.2
174
7.b O
65
0.100
0.400
0.240
0.038
29.1
23.3

-------
ST0 ET RETRIEVAL OATE 76/09/10
470103
3? 01 14.0 088 03 28.0 3
LAKE AR LEY
21143 TENNESSEE
052091
1 LEPALES
0070 FEET
2111202
OEPTr$ CLASS 00
73/05/16 13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
13 30 0040
13 30 0064
73/10/20 10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0015
10 00 0035
10 00 0049
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.085
0.109
0.112
0.113
0.129
0.119
0.114
0.106
0.113
0.135
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROrI
OF
TO
DAY FEET
73/05/16
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
13 30 0040
13 30 0064
73/10/20
10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0015
10 00 0035
10 00 0049
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY FEET
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
N02&N03
PHOSDIS
WAtER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
Pri
T ALK
NH3-N
TOT
ORTHO
TEMP
SECCrII
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
P
CENT
P46/L
INCHES
MICROMt-iO
SU
MG/L
I4(,/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
19.8
3u
215
8.40
98
0.050
0.500
0.300
0.028
19.6
10.8
220
8.50
97
0.040
0.400
0.290
19.5
10.4
220
8.30
99
0.040
0.400
0.310
19.4
10.6
220
8.30
89
0.050
0.300
0.290
0.027
19.3
10.6
220
8.30
89
0.030
0.200
0.260
21.8
20
166
7.40
61
0.040
0.300
0.470
0.058
21.8
6.8
167
7.40
59
0.040
0.200K
0.480
21.8
6.6
166
7.40
57
0.040
0.200K
0.470
0.053
21.7
7.0
165
7.50
58
0.040
0.300
21.4
7.2
166
7.80
56
0.050
0.400
0.420
28.4
9.7
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS TriAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470104
36 7 35.0 088 01 35.0 3
LAKE 8ARKLEY
21143 TENNESSEE
052091
1 1EPALES
0012 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/16 14 20 0000
14 20 0005
14 20 0015
14 20 0045
14 20 0068
73/08/14 14 35 0000
14 35 0005
14 35 0025
14 35 0040
14 35 0065
0.155
0 • 125
0.125
0.125
o • 1 36
0.128
0.128
0.123
0.130
0.132
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
73/05/16 14 20 0000
14 70 0005
14 20 0015
14 20 0045
14 20 0068
73/08/14 14 35 0000
14 35 0005
14 35 0025
14 35 0040
14 35 0065
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00010
00300
00077
0oO 4
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOIJCTVY
Pi-$
T ALK
NH3-N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
P11OS-UI
TEMP
SECCMI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTr4O
CENT
MG/I
INCHES
MICROMMO
SD
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
19. ,
2’.
220
8.10
89
0.040
0.400
0.430
0.027
19.4
9.3
220
8.10
90
0.040
0.2001 <
0.440
0.049
19. ’
9.2
220
8.00
89
0.040
0.200
0.440
0.046
19.3
9.2
220
8.00
89
0.040
0.200K
0.460
0.052
19.2
8.9
220
7. 0
89
0.050
0.200K
0.460
0.047
26.5
34
171
7.20
65
0.130
0.600
0.320
0.061
26.5
6.6
170
7.40
65
0.100
0.300
0.300
0.056
26.2
5.8
170
7.30
65
0.130
0.300
0.310
0.057
26.2
5.9
170
7.20
65
0.140
0.300
0.320
0.056
26.1
6.0
170
7.20
65
0.140
0.200
0.320
0.051
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
13.0
13.9
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE Th/09/10
470105
36 52 31.0 087 58 08.0 3
LAKE BARKLEY
21221 TENNESSEE
052091
I 1EPALES
0059 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/16 16 21 0000
16 21 0004
16 21 0015
16 21 0035
16 ?1 0055
73/10/20 12 35 0000
12 35 0005
12 35 0015
12 35 0030
12 35 0045
12 35 0059
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CI-4LRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
0.135
0.124
0.129
0.118
0 • 1 34
0.136
0.128
0.130
0.126
0.133
0.156
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/05/16
16 21
16 21
16 21
16 21
16 21
0000
0004
0015
0035
0055
73/10/20
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 35
0000
0005
0015
0030
0045
0059
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT ,cJEL
NO2 .N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MIC OMHO
SU
MG/L
M(,/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
19.4
18
220
8.00
84
0.050
0.400
0.440
0.047
19.4
9.5
220
8.00
86
0.040
0.200
0.430
0.054
19.4
9.2
215
a.0o
86
0.040
0.200
0.430
0.052
19.3
8.9
220
7.90
85
0.050
0.200
0.460
0.051
19.0
12.7
220
7.90
88
0.060
0.200
0.510
0.050
22.6
29
173
7.40
57
0.050
0.600
0.410
0.074
22.3
5.8
172
7.30
56
0.040
0.200K
0.400
0.070
22.2
5.8
172
7.40
55
0.050
0.200K
0.390
0.072
22.0
4.6
173
7.30
57
0.050
0.200K
0.390
0.063
21.7
5.8
172
7.30
61
0.050
0.200K
0.420
0.060
21.4
5.8
172
7.30
60
0.050
0.200K
0.430
0.062
18.5
5.5
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470106
36 45 55.0 087 57 48.0 3
LAKE t3ARKLEY
21221 TENNESSEE
0520’ 1
1 1EPALES
0047 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/17 10 IS 0000
10 15 0006
10 15 0015
10 15 0030
10 15 0044
73/08/14 15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0025
15 00 0055
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLPPPIYL
A
MG/L P JG/L
0.126
0.111
0.117
0.127
0 • 145
0.164
0.144
0.143
0.167
DATE
TIME DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/05/17
10 15
10 1
10 15
10 15
10 iS
0000
0006
0015
0030
0044
73/08/14
15 00
15 00
15 00
15 00
0000
0005
0025
0055
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
00010
00300
00077
000 4
00400
KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—QIS
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
1 ALK
NH3—N
N—TOTAL
ORT -$O
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
MG/L P
CENT
MG/L
iNCHES
MICROhiHO
SD
M0/L
HG/L
MG/L
18.9
25
219
7.80
80
0.060
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.043
0.047
18.9
9.4
212
7.90
81
0.050
0.410
0.042
18.9
9.1
210
7.80
79
0.050
0.300
0.410
0.047
18.9
9.2
214
7.80
80
0.050
0.410
0.042
18.8
9.1
208
7.80
81
0.050
0.170
0.400
0.450
0.083
25.8
29
173
7.20
66
0.450
0.081
25.8
6.2
173
7.20
67
0.150
0.450
0.080
25.5
25.5
5.6
5.9
173
172
7.20
7.20
68
67
0.160
0.160
0.400
0.460
0.070
17.0
5.2

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470107
36 41 03.0 087 55 09.0 3
LA cE dA tcLEi
21221 TE NESSE
052092
1 1EPALES
0055 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/17 12 55 0000
12 55 0006
12 55 0015
12 55 0035
12 55 0050
73/10/20 13 05 0000
13 05 0015
13 05 0030
13 05 0048
0.117
0.119
0.139
0.124
0 • 128
0 • 162
0 • 145
0.150
0 • 149
DATE
FR OP-i
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
73/05/17 12 55 0000
1? 55 0006
12 55 0015
12 s5 0035
12 55 0050
73/10/20 13 05 0000
13 05 0015
13 05 0030
13 05 0048
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
4.8
4.8
5.0
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRaNSP
CNOUCT IY
Ph
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECC)-II
FIELD
CACO3
1O AL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTIiO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MIC OMrlO
SU
M /L
MG/L
MG/L
M&/L
MG/L P
18.9
24
201
7.70
78
0.060
3.400
0.400
0.042
18.
201
7.80
78
0.050
0.300
0.400
0.041
18.8
200
7.80
78
0.060
0.200
0.420
0.045
18.8
201
7.90
77
0.050
0.300
0.400
0.040
18.8
200
7.80
78
0.060
0.300
0.400
0.040
23.7
29
184
7.30
62
0.140
0.500
0.420
0.101
23.4
185
7.20
63
0.130
0.300
0.410
0.091
23.3
182
7.20
62
0.140
0.300
0.400
0.089
22.9
183
7.10
60
0.150
0.200
0.360
0.085
DATE
FR OH
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P U&L
12.4
2.8

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/LU
470108
36 31 41.0 081 52
LAKE HARKLEY
47151 TENNESSEE
1 IEPALES
0055 FEET
2111202
DEPTh CLASS 00
73/05/17 13 45 0000
13 65 0007
13 45 0015
13 45 0030
13 45 0050
73/08/14 10 ‘5 0000
10 ?5 0005
10 25 0025
10 25 0043
0.110
0.140
0.105
0.211
0.231
0.127
0.107
0.138
0.154
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12.0 3
052091
73/05/17 13 45 0000
13 45 0007
13 65 0015
13 45 0030
13 45 0050
73/08/14 10 25 0000
10 2 0005
10 25 0025
10 25 0043
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
0U41
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
P-i
T
ALK
r1H3—N
TOT KJEL
NO2bNO3
PiIOS—UIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORThO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICPOMHO
SU
Mu/L
Mu/L
MG/L
MG#’L
HG/L P
18.5
25
200
7.80
77
0.070
0.500
0.430
0.04’.
18.5
9.4
201
7.70
78
0.070
0.400
0.660
0.043
18.4
9.5
201
7.80
11
0.060
0.300
0.430
0.040
18.3
9.2
200
7.80
77
0.060
0.300
0.450
0.041
18.3
9.2
200
7.80
76
0.060
0.400
0.450
0.039
25.1
30
175
7.20
64
0.140
0.400
0.440
0.068
25.1
6.0
174
7.20
66
0.140
0.300
0.440
0.064
25.0
6.0
174
7.20
67
0.140
0.400
0.440
0.062
25.0
6.2
174
7.10
66
0.130
0.400
0.440
0.053
DATE
F ROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
10.0
3.2

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470109
36 2’ 05.0 037 44 33.0 3
LAKr 8ARKLEY
47161 TENNESSEE
0 ,2091
1 ILPALES
0060 FEET
211 1202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/17 16 10 0000
16 10 0006
16 10 0015
16 10 0035
16 10 0055
16 11 0000
73/10/20 14 40 0000
14 40 0005
14 40 0015
14 40 0025
14 40 0040
0.127
0.140
0.169
0.157
0.260
0.127
0 • 159
0.145
0.144
0.160
o • 174
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/05/17
16 10
lb 10
16 10
16 10
16 10
16 11
0000
0006
0015
0035
0055
0000
73/10/20
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
DATE
TIME
DEPTh
FROM
OF
TO
OAY
FEET
9.6
9.4
9.5
8.8
5.6
5.4
5.4
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
WATER
00
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
NO2 NO3
PHOS—UIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
URTHO
CENT
HG/L
INCHES
MLC1OMHO
St.)
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
M&,/L
MG/L P
17.5
20
199
7.80
74
0.C6O
0.600
0.450
0.050
17.7
199
7.80
74
0.050
0.500
0.450
0.047
17.7
199
7.80
74
0.040
0.500
0.450
0.046
18.0
200
7.80
77
0.050
0.200
0.450
0.046
19.0
24.5
20
26
199
201
183
7.80
7.70
?. o
77
72
58
0.040
0.060
0.150
0.300
0.500
0.500
0.460
0.460
0.360
0.039
0.044
0.095
24.5
184
7.30
56
0.140
0.200K
0.340
0.090
24.2
182
7.20
56
0.140
0.200
0.330
0.091
24.2
183
7.20
55
0.140
0.200K
0.330
0.089
24.1
182
7.30
54
0.140
0.200K 0.360
0.089
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CHLPPHYL
A
M6/L P UG/L
9.4
9.4
5.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRiEVAL DATE 76/09/10
‘ .70110
36 23 41.0 087 39 33.0 3
LAKE dARKLEY
47161 TENNESSEL
052091
1 1EPALES
0035 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/17 16 50 0000
16 50 0006
16 50 0015
16 50 0030
73/08/1. 09 45 0000
09 45 0005
09 45 0015
09 45 0035
0.136
0.257
0.287
0.300
0.132
0.125
0 • 128
0.153
DAlE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/35/17
16 50
Lb 0
16 50
16 50
0000
0006
0015
0030
73/08/1 .
09 45
09 45
09 45
09 45
0000
0005
0015
0035
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
9.4
9.6
9.6
6. 1
6.2
6.3
00010
00300
0 077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T ALK
NPI3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMMO
SU
MG/L
M&/L
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L P
17.3
182
7.80
77
0.050
0.300
0.450
0.047
18.1
200
7.80
76
0.050
0.200
0.450
0.043
17.6
200
7.80
76
0.050
0.400
0.450
0.044
18.1
199
7.80
76
0.060
0.300
0.460
0.045
25.0
18
163
7.10
62
0.150
0.800
0.390
0.063
25.0
164
7.10
63
0.150
0.600
0.400
0.057
24.9
164
7.1u
61
0.130
0.600
0.390
0.051
24.9
164
7.10
62
0.130
0.400
0.390
0.040
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
10.3
4.9

-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 LA 1
37 01 50.0 088 13 33.0 4
CUM E LANU R1VEi
47 LYON Y CO MAP
0/LAPSE AI r LE( 0 2092
US 6’.1 62 t3RO 6 MI W OF EOL)Y’IILLE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2bNO3 TOT P JEL N93—N PrIOSOIS PPIOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L M 3 /L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 13 00 0.399 0.880 O.005PS 0.029 0.080
73/05/05 13 00 0.450 2.050 0.052 0.035 0.100
73/06/03 0.390 0.510 u. OS O 0.044 0.130
73/06/30 13 06 0.273 0.840 0.042 0.033 0.110
73/08/26 13 06 0.105 0.350 0.048 0.037 0.090
73/09/18 13 06 0.220 0.460 ( .092 0.044 0.125
73/10/21 13 06 0.560 0.450 0.036 0.055 0.260
73/11/03 1? 06 0.400 0.350 0.016 0.135
73/12/17 13 06 0.560 0.300 0.024 0.052 0.110
74/01/26 13 06 0.5 0 0.100 0.028 0.050 0.158
14/02/0. 13 06 0.56u 0.800 0.030 0.050 0.150
74/02/17 13 06 0.540 0.600 0.030 0.035 0.100
74/03/01 13 00 0.500 0.400 0.040 0.040 0.155
K VALUE iSNOWN TO BE
LESS TMi N INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
DATE
00630
TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3
00625
TOT KJEL
00610
NH3—N
00671
P iOS—OIS
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
73/0’./1’. 09 00
73/05/OS u9 01
73/06/01 09 01
73/07/01 08 39
73/08/26 09 01
73/09/ IH 09 01
73/10/20 09 01
73/11/07 09 01
73/12/18 09 01
74/01/26 09 00
74/02/03 09 01
74/02/lb 09 01
74/03/03 09 00
0.336
0.350
0 . ‘ .70
0 • 350
0.240
0 • 650
0.480
0.336
0.450
0.490
0.450
0.480
0.450
470142
36 30 15.0 08? 22 45.0 ‘ .
CUM8EI LAND t IVER
‘ .7 MONTGOMERY Co MA
1/LAKE AP KLEY 0S2091
C ) RT 13 JUST E OF CUMBERLAND HEIGHTS
I 1EPALES 211120..
0000 FEEl DEPTh CLASS 00
00665
Ri-lOS—TOT
MG/L P
0.115
0.220
0 • 135
0 • 125
0.200
0.120
0.220
0.100
u.180
0.105
0.120
0.270
3.00 0
0.590
0.370
0.230
0.420
0.350
0.550
0.100
0.200
0.500
1.000
0.50 0
0.014
0.063
0.115
0.120
0.072
0.097
0.072
0 • 130
0.056
0.028
v.025
0.040
0.035
0.042
o.082
0.099
0 • 030
0.069
0.120
0.0 78
0.055
0.047
u.042
u.030
0.0 40

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 1t31
37 (14 10.0 088 05 30.0 4
UNNAMED ST EAM
47 LYON i Y Co MAP
T/LAPcE ARKLEY 0 2091
US 2’ BROG NEAR MOUTH IN EDOYVILLE
IIEPALES 2111234
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPtH N02&N03 TOT JEL NH3—N Pl-10S—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORT -lO
to DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P Mu/L P
73/04/14 12 00 0.023 20.000 12.000 4.200 b.SOO
73/05/05 12 02 0.390 5.200 2.200 0.570 0.900
73/06/03 12 02 0.023 17.800 12.400 13.300
73/06/30 12 0 0.032 26.000 17.000 10.800 15.000
73/09/18 12 02 0.033 33.000 26.000 14.900 17.000
73/10/21 12 02 0.050 26.000 17.60C 20.000 22.000
73/12/17 12 02 0.088 25.000 16.000 10.600 12.000
74/01/26 12 02 0.300 7.500 3.900 2.500 3.850
74/02/03 12 05 0.176 15.000 6.300 .700 4.500
74/02/17 12 02 0.028 22.000 13.200 11.500 13.200
74/03/0 1 12 02 0.044 21.000 16.800 6.300 8.050

-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/t)9
470 1C 1
37 02 10.0 C87 58 30.0 4
E)OY CREEis
47 LYON 
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470101
36 54 10.0 087 51 50.0 4
MUDU’( FORK LITTLE. rUVER
TrUG3 icY Co MAP
T/LAKE 8A KLEY 05 091
ST RT 778 8 OG 2 M l NW OF CADIZ
11E ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTrI CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL Nh3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04I1’4 10 52 1.900 0.730 0.039 0.010 0.040
73/0S/0 10 52 0.640 0.770 0. 110 0.036 0.125
73/06/03 10 52 1.620 0.740 0.043 0.015 0.070
73/06/30 10 52 0.970 3.600 1.680 0.069 0.185
73/08/2k” 10 5. 0.300 0.660 0.025 0.018 0.060
73/09/18 10 52 0.390 0.600 .110 0.020 0.062
73/10/21 10 52 0.590 0.350 0.020 0.020 0.045
73/11/03 10 52 0.550 0.950 0.021 0.050
73/12/17 10 52 2.300 0.250 0.038 0.012 0.02
74/O1/2b 10 S f , 2.400 0.200 0.028 0.020 0.O SC
74/02/02 ii 32 2.300 1.300 0.045 0.020 0.055
74/02/17 10 52 0.490 0.500 0.050 0.010 0.045
74/03/01 10 52 2.100 0.300 0.050 0.015 0.052
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 1E1
36 51 20.0 087 SO 30.0 4
LITTLE R1VE,
47 TRIOG PSY CO MAP
T/LA E BAR cLEY 052091
ST PT 11 8RDG AT 5 EDGE OF CADIZ
11 PALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DA’r FEET PIG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/04/14 10 27 2.400 0.540 0.019 0.052 0.080
73/05/05 10 27 1.980 3.600 0.730 0.046 0.100
73/06/03 10 27 2.500 0.390 0.050 0.126 0.175
73/06/30 10 27 2.300 1.800 0.530 0.230 0.500
73/08/2t 10 27 2.300 0.100K 0.052 0.140 0.18C
73/09/18 10 7 1.920 0.595 0.120 0.230 0.300
73/10/21 10 27 1.560 0.700 0.046 0.480 0.720
73/11/03 10 29 1.200 0.850 0.028 0.300
73/12/17 10 7 3.000 0.300 0.024 0.084 0.120
74/01/26 10 27 2.640 0.100K 0.048 0.055 0.090
74/02/02 10 27 2.300 0.600 0.030 0.070 0.170
74/02/17 10 27 0.528 0.400 0.150 0.135 0.135
74/03/01 10 27 2.400 0.400 0.025 0.070 0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7ä/09/09
470 iF!
36 45 00.0 Oi37 5’. 15.0 4
UO JALDSON C’ EEK
47 T Lc,(, KY Cu MAP
T/LAKE BAI KLEY 052091
sr PT lo ’. D& NEAI DONALDSON
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME OEPT 1 NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PriOS—DIS PMOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FELT HG/L MG/L MG/L MG/I P MG/L P
73/04/14 09 50 0.240 1. 90 0.067 0.005i< 0.010
73/05/05 09 50 0.252 0.630 0.210 0.005 0.015
13/06/03 09 50 0.420 0.200 0.050 0.014 0.015
73/Ob/30 09 50 0.520 0.800 0.300 0.010 0.015
73/08/26 09 50 0.31C 0.100K 0.0 17 0.013 0.020
73/09/Ps 09 50 0.240 0.140 0.037 0.016 0.020
13/10/21 09 50 0.170 0.250 0.023 0.027
73/11/03 09 50 0.098 0.100K 0.008 0.015
73/12/17 09 50 0.495 0.200 0.012 0.005 0.010
74/01/20 09 50 C.500 0.100K 0.020 0.005K 0.005K
74/02/02 09 50 0.500 0.500 0.020 0.010 0.045
74/02/17 09 50 0.820 0.250 0.040 0.005
74/03/01 09 00 0.240 0.200 0.015 0.005 0.025
K VALUE IcNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE Th/09/09
470 IGi
36 36 25.0 087 50 18.0 4
SALINE CREEK
47 STEWA Co MAP
7/LAKE 8ARKLEY 0 209l
Co RT 120 NEAR 8UMPUS MILLS
1LEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET QEPTrI CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
TIME DEPTH r4O2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORThO
UAV FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 13 26 0.350 1.050 0.080 0.005K 0.025
13/05/06 13 26 0.390 0.170 0.042 0.019 0.020
73/06/02 13 20 0.231 1.600 0.370 0.005K 0.045
73/06/30 17 00 0.040 1.980 0.835 0.010 0.090
73/08/25 13 26 0.070 1.440 0.105 0.015 0.113
73/C9/1S 13 26 0.022 1.000 0.170 0.010 0.095
73/10/20 13 26 0.084 1.030 0.069 0.009 0.085
73/11/03 13 26 0.085 0.875 0.132 0.092
73/12/17 13 26 0.224 0.500 0.124 0.005K 0.015
74/01/26 13 26 0.540 0.100K 0.032 0.035 0.125
74/02/03 13 26 0.490 0.300 0.050 0.015 0.045
74/02/15 13 26 0.470 0.300 0.010 0.005K 0.060
74/03/03 13 26 0.352 0.400 0.125 0.010 0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICAIED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 16/09/09
470 1 41
36 31 35.0 087 48 55.0 4
OYEWS CREEK
‘ .7 STEWART Co MAP
T/LAKE BAi KLEY 052091
US 79 3R0(, 3 MI N OF COVER
UEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTr$ CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTh N02bN03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PpjOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/I MG/I MG/I MG/I P MG/L
73/04/14 12 30 0.378 0.480 0.015 0.005K 0.010
73/05/06 12 24 0.600 0.130 0.015 0.005K 0.005K
73/06/02 12 24 0.720 0.180 0.048 0.009 0.010
73/06/30 16 20 0.790 2.500 1.100 0.007 0.015
73/08/25 12 24 0.460 0.1001< 0.030 0.010 0.010
73/09/19 12 ?4 0.420 0.170 0.033 0.010 0.025
73/10/20 12 24 0.480 0.1001< 0.016 0.009 0.009
73/11/03 12 24 0.330 0.200 0.027 0.004 0.020
73/12/li 12 24 0.810 0.1001< 0.012 0.005 0.009
74/01/26 12 24 0.740 0.1001< 0.016 0.010 0.010
74/02/03 12 24 0.650 0.1001< 0.020 0.010 0.010
74/02/15 12 24 1.010 0.1001< 0.010 0.0051< 0.010
74/03/03 12 34 0.540 0.200 0.025 0.010 0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
TIME
OF
DAY
00630
DEPTH N02&N03
N—TOTAL
FEET MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH 3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
4701J1
36 29 42.0 087 41 55.0 4
FERRY CROSS CP EEI
‘.7 sTE ARr CO MA
T/LAKE 8AR cLE(
bANK ALONG GRAVEL
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTh
DATE
FROM
TO
00671 00665
PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
ORTHO
MG/L P MG/L P
052091
RD S OF INDIAN HOUND
211 1204
CLASS 00
73/04/14
14
16
0.210
1.050
0.023
0.005K
0.010
73/05/06
14
16
0.360
0.120
0.023
0.006
0.010
73/06/02
14
16
0.450
0.210
0.03’.
0.007
0.010
73/06/30
17
40
0.510
1.760
0.6e5
0.007
0.010
73/08/25
14
16
0.400
0.200
0.018
O.OOa
0.015
73/09/U3
14
16
0.336
0.600
0.022
0.011
0.0 5
73/10/20
14
16
0.336
0.100K
0.022
0.008
0.020
73/11/02
14
16
0.260
0.600
0.017
0.004
0.060
73/12/17
14
16
0.540
0.300
0.016
0.012
0.012
74/01/26
14
16
0.510
0.100
0.016
0.010
0.010
74/02/03
14
16
0.400
0.100K
0.020
0.005K
0.005K
74/02/15
14
16
0.540
0.500
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
74/03/03
14
10
0.2d8
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.010
K VALUE KI 4OWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7o/09/09
4701K 1
36 28 50.0 087 31 15.0 4
BLOOMING GROVE C’ EtJ
47 MONTG0ME Y CO HA
T/LAKE t3ARKLEY 052091
bANK ALONG GRAVEL RD P41 w DOTSOt’ VILLE
1IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTpI N02&N03 TOT KJEL NP13—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MC,/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/06/30 18 15 0.450 0.420 0.220 0.010 0.015
73/08/25 15 41 0.024 0.910 0.0 16 0.010 0.085
73/09/18 15 41 0.090 0.860 0.066 0.027 0.115
73/10/20 15 41 0.154 0.800 0.115 0.024 0.110
73/11/02 15 41 0.200 0.900 0.078 0.024 0.130
73/12/17 15 41 0.450 0.600 0.008 0.012 0.230
74/01/26 15 41 0.534 0.100K 0.008 0.010 0.010
74/02/03 15 41 0.400 0.300 0.030 0.005K 0.005
74/02/15 15 41 0.410 0.100K 0.005K 0.005K 0.005K
74/03/03 15 41 0.216 0.200 0.0 10 0.010 0.0 10
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 IL 1
36 32 40.0 087 22 10.0 4
RED 1vER
47 MONIGOMERY Co MA
T/LAKE BARKLEY 052091
US 41A AT SE EDGE OF NEW P O IIDENCE
L1EP ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02 NO3 TOT KJEL NM3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOl
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 08 40 2.020 0.270 0.039 0.039 0.065
73/05/Gb 08 34 1.940 0.310 0.058 0.016 0.075
73/06/01 08 39 2,100 3,570 1.020 0.052 0.115
73/07/01 08 39 2.300 0.525 0.115 0.105 0.200
73/08/25 08 39 0.810 0.750 0.290 0.215 0.290
73/09/1 08 39 1.040 0.960 0.470 0.336 0.420
73/10/20 08 39 0.430 0.400 0.090 0.082 0.150
73/11/03 08 34 0.380 0.500 0.140 0.090 0.160
73/12/17 08 39 2,520 0.600 0.084 0.140 0.230
74/01/26 08 39 2.300 o.ioo c 0.040 0.048 0.075
74/02/03 08 39 2.400 0.100 0.025 0.035 0.075
74/02/16 08 39 0.510 0.400 0.020 0.030 0.100
74/03/03 J8 39 2.180 0.400 0.040 0.045 0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO bE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/C9
470 iN!
36 27 04.0 087 o 25.0 4
bUDOS CREEK
47 MONTGOMERY CO MA
T/LAKL BAWPcLEY 052091
ST H V 149 T 0G MI SW OV CLAPP(SVILLE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO ?6.N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N Pi-iOS—DI5 PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET M j/L MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
13/04/1’. 09 32 0.210 2.400 0.042 0.005K 0.015
73/05/06 09 35 0.180 0.120 0.005K 0.005K 0.025
73/06/02 09 33 0.310 0.190 0.041 0.015 0.025
73/07/01 09 32 0.231 0.540 0.052 0.016 0.025
73/08/25 09 3? 0.190 0.900 0.063 0.025 0.090
73/09/11 U9 32 0.132 0.180 0.040 0.022 0.030
73/10/20 09 32 0.026 0.150 0.027 0.017 0.025
73/11/02 39 32 0.022 0.250 0.017 0.012 0.070
73/12/lB 09 32 0.288 0.100K 0.028 0.010 0.010
74/01/26 09 30 0.390 0.100K 0.016 0.012 0.015
74/02/03 09 32 0.330 0.400 0.020 0.005 0.050
74/03/03 09 32 0.056 0.100 0.015 0.010 0.010
K VALUE Kt’.OWN TO BE
LESS TI-IAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 1- 1
36 24 50.0 087 34 55.0 4
YELLOW CREEK
MONT&OMLRY CO HA
I/LAKE ARKLEY 052091
CO RI 149 BROG 3 MI OF TARSUS
11Er ALES 2111204
0000 FEEl DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L PIG/L MG/L MG/L P M(.,/L P
73/04/14 10 07 0.110 0.150 0.011 0.005K 0.010
73/05/06 10 07 0.176 1.900 0.060 0.007 0.035
73/06/02 10 07 0.126 0.280 0.031 0.007 0.035
73/07/01 10 07 0.056 0.360 0.024 0.007 0.040
73/08/25 10 07 0.063 0.520 0.018 0.016 0.075
73/09/17 10 07 0.180 0.780 0.025 0.02d 0.115
73/10/20 10 04 0.315 0.400 0.073 0.064 0.12 ,
73/11/02 10 07 0.330 0.500 0.160 0.101 0.185
73/12/18 10 07 0.288 0.600 0.072 0.020 0.053
7 /0I/27 10 07 0.510 0.100K 0.008 0.016 0.016
74/02/03 10 07 0.410 0.100K 0.020 0.020 0.025
74/02/15 10 07 0.300 0.300 0.027 0.0051c 0.025
74/03/03 10 07 0.276 0.300 0.035 0.010 0.030
K Vt LUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS TH4N INOICATEL)
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470101
36 21
wELLS
47
T IL A ‘ S E
GRAVEL
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
00665
PHOS- TOT
MG/L
052092
CO RT 149 3 MI N EPIN
2111204
CLASS 00
17.0 387 40 00.0 4
C RE E K
HOUSTON TN CO MA
8ARKLE Y
Pt) 8R06 OFF
00630
00625
00610
00671
DATE
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
TOT
KJEL
NPI3—N
Pi-iOS—DIS
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY FEET
MGIL
1G/L
MG/L
MG/L P
73/04/14
10
40
0.170
0.100K
0.005K
0.018
0.025
73/05/06
10
40
0.250
1.680
0.046
0.018
0.025
73/06/02
10
40
0.294
0.140
0.037
0.039
0.040
73/07/01
10
40
0.360
0.180
0.020
0.042
0.065
73/08/?S
10
40
0.270
0.200
0.013
0.048
0.065
73/09/17
10
40
0.260
0.150
0.018
0.076
0.095
73/10/20
10
40
0.270
0.1001<
0.028
0.078
0.080
73/11/03
10
40
0.210
0.150
0.013
0.065
0.135
73/12/18
10
40
0.528
0.600
0.036
0.050
0.065
74/01/27
10
40
0.510
0.200
0.016
0.044
0.045
74/02/03
10
40
0.276
0.500
0.020
0.005K
0.020
74/02/15
10
40
0.352
0.100K
0.015
0.035
0.040
74/03/03
10
40
0.224
0.200
0.020
0.032
0.037
K VALUE KNOWN TO 6E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7e/09/09
470 1 1
36 25 30.0 087 45 25.0 4
S CROSS c E&.vc
47 STE 4 T TN CO MA
T/LAKE BARKLEY 052092
I•1 Y bROG AT CAMLISLE
11EPAL .S 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTP-4 CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPflI NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N Pr$OSOIS PHOSTOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL O THO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P PIG/L P
73/0’./14 11 15 0.058 1.000 0.023 0.005P 0.005K
73/05/06 11 15 0.147 1.890 0.070 0.008 0.015
73/06/02 11 15 0.147 0.290 0.062 0.015 0.025
73/07/01 11 15 0.189 0.180 0.019 0.015 0.040
73/08/25 11 15 p.132 0.140 0.015 0.014 0.017
73/09/17 11 15 0.120 0.160 0.017 0.018 0.025
73/10/20 11 15 0.075 0.100K 0.014 u.012 0.015
73/11/02 11 15 0.092 0.300 0.035 0.017 0.080
73/12/lB 11 15 0.276 0.700 0.056 0.020 0.020
74/01/27 11 15 0.470 0.100 0.064 0.016 0.025
74/02/03 11 15 0.168 0.100 0.015 0.005 0.010
74/02/IS 11 15 0.250 0.600 0.025 0.005 0.005
74/03/03 13 15 0.152 0.100K 0.015 0.015 0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BL
LESS THAN INOIC TED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE Th/09/09
470151
36 27 28.0 087 47 57.0 4
LONG CPEEK
47 STEWART TN Co MA
T/LApcE 8ARK.LEY 052092
BANK ALONG SIC HWY 4 MI SE OF DOVER
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00611 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PliOS-TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAl.. ORTI4O
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MGI’L P
73/04/14 11 47 0.071 0.110 0.007 0.O05 (,.010
73/05/06 11 47 0.260 1.300 0.037 0.007 0.010
73/06/02 11 47 0.294 0.730 0.105 0.023 0.092
73/07/01 11 47 0.350 0.100K 0.017 0.015 0.025
73/08/25 12 04 0.320 0.190 0.009 0.016 0.025
73/09/17 11 47 0.190 0.140 0.020 0.018 0.025
73/10/20 17 47 0.250 0.150 0.023 0.018 0.018
73/11/03 11 17 0.198 0.150 0.032 0.035
73/12/18 12 40 0.224 0.100K 0.016 0.020 0.025
74/01/27 11 12 0.504 0.300 0.036 0.016 0.020
74/02/03 11 47 0.240 0.300 0.030 0.005 0.010
74102/15 17 47 0.300 0.500 0.025 0.005 0.005
74/03/03 11 47 0.200 0.300 0.020 0.015 0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 IT 1
36 28 10.0 0 7 49 58.0 4
LICK CREEK
47 STEWAWT IN Co MA
T/LAIcE aARKLEY 052092
BANK AT ENU OF GRAVEL RD E OF DOVER
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTrt CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N026N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTrtO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 12 04 0.040 0.780 0.012 0.00 5K 0.010
73/05/06 12 04 0.138 1.030 0.034 0.007 0.010
73/06/02 12 04 0.176 0.300 0.039 0.016 0.020
73/07/01 12 04 0.240 0.330 0.042 0.022 0.035
73/08/25 12 04 0.147 0.200 0.007 0.017 0.030
73/09/17 12 04 0.126 0.100K 0.017 0.025 0.035
73/10/20 12 04 0.096 0.100K 0.006 0.019 0.020
73/11/02 12 04 0.080 0.100K 0.026 0.020 0.040
73/12/18 11 47 0.224 0.300 0.028 0.020 0.025
74/01/27 12 04 0.320 0.100K 0.044 0.012 0.015
74/02/03 12 04 0.136 0.100 0.015 0.005K 0.005
74/02/15 12 04 0.132 0.100K 0.010 0.005 0.010
74/03/03 12 04 0.044 0.100 0.010 0.015 0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OAT 76/09/09
470 IUI
36 30 25.0 087 53 14.0 4
€AR CREE’
47 STEwART TN Co MA
1/LAKE I3ARIcLEY 052092
sr HWY 49 8ROG 4 P41 NW OF DOVEP
I IEPALES 211120’.
0000 FEET DEPTM CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME OEPTI’4 N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOSDIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTPiO
To DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L P46/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 15 11 0.252 1.150 0.019 0.005K 0.005K
73/05/05 15 11 0.190 0.100K 0.021 0.005K 0.005K
73/06/15 19 00 0.550 2.900 0.098 0.005K 0.010
73/06/30 15 26 0.336 2.100 0.870 0.008 0.010
73/12/18 15 ?6 0.360 0.100 0.012 0.005 0.012
74/01/27 15 26 0.430 0.100K 0.028 0.008 0.010
74/02/02 IS 30 0.240 1e100 0.670 0.005 0.005
74/02/15 15 26 0.192 0.300 0.015 0.005K 0.015
74/02/17 15 26 1.200 0.200 0.012 0.005K
74/03/01 15 26 0.254 0.200 0.015 0.005K 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN 10 BE
LESS THAN INOIC\TEO
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 lvi
3b 59 2 .3 088 13 15.0 4
CANAL
‘.7 LYON icY Co MAP
T/LAI’ E ARiSLEY 040892
TRACE PD 8ROG 2 MI NNW OF TWIN LArc€S
L1EPALES 211120’.
0000 FEET OtPTh CLASS 00
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PriOS—DIS
PHOS-TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
Tu
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG,’L
MC,/L
MG/L P
MG/L r’
73/04/14
13 20
0.450
1.680
0.072
0.037
0.075
73/05/05
13 31
0.410
0.440
0.075
0.042
0.100
73/06/03
13 31
0.410
0.420
0.039
0.058
0.140
73/06/30
13 3
0.330
1.760
1.000
0.029
0.105
73/08/2S
13 31
0,040
0.300
0.007
0.013
0.065
73/09/18
13 31
0.210
0.340
0.023
0.034
0.075
73/10/21
13 31
0,310
0.400
0.033
0.050
0.240
73/11/03
13 31
0.310
0.300
0.028
0.034
0.120
73/12/18
13 30
0.450
0.600
0.044
0.060
0.105
74/01/27
13 31
0.610
0,300
0.028
0.048
0.110
74/02/02
13 31
0.580
0.500
0.020
0.045
0.110
74/02/17
13 31
0.640
0.300
0.070
0.030
0.075
74/03/01
13 31
0.504
0.400
0.055
0.040
0.110
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4701bA TF47O1BA P000900
37 04 20.0 088 05 00.0 4
EODYV1LLE ,cE lTuCicY)
47 LYON Co r1WY MAP
T/BARKLEY LAKE 0S2O 1
HAMMOND CkEE,c
L1EPALIS 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTrI CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N Pi-IOS—DIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw-MGO
TO DAY FEET MG/L M&/L MG/L rl&/L P 4 /L P INST MGD MONTrtLY
73/04/30 0.700 34.030 14.400 7.700 17.300
73/05/31 1.450 29.000 15.900 8.700 14.500
73/06/30 0.130 30.000 13.200 14.400 18.800
73/07/31 0.520 42.000 16.800 6.500 18.000
73/08/31 0.430 15.100 12.400
73/10/09 14 30 0.100 34.000 23.000 12.600 27.000
73/11/12 11 00 0.060 44.000 20.500 9.700 19.500
74/01/15 10 45 0.840 22.500 2.880 3.800 9.800
74/03/02 12 20 0.120 31.000 9.500 8.700 18.000
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4701C4 TF 47 O1CA
37 05 00.0 087 53 20.0 4
PRINCETON (KENTUCKY)
47 CALDUELL Co HW
T/BARKLEY LAKE
EDDY CREEK
1LEP ALES
0000 FEET
P005620
052091
2141204
DEPTH CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS-’TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
M(,/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
VIGiL ?
INST MGD
MONTHLY
73/04/30
15 00
1.200
14.000
3.700
5.900
7.900
0.690
0.851
73/05/31
15 00
1.070
19.800
9.700
8.830
10.500
0.653
0.634
73/06/30
15 00
2.100
22.000
11.100
11.600
14.000
0.473
0.484
73/07/31
15 00
1.800
21.000
5.800
12.600
17.300
0.449
0.494
73/08/31
15 00
25.200
12.400
15.100
0.490
0.469
73/09/30
15 00
3.600
26,000
14.000
9.100
12.000
0.416
0.441
73/10/31
15 00
2.700
22,000
15.000
11.000
15.000
0.415
0.448
73/11/30
15 00
3.000
9.900
0.092
5.300
a.20 0
0.865
0.584
73/12/31
15 00
2.100
14.500
0.450
3.900
6.900
0.784
0.555
74/01/31
15 00
1.320
14.000
3.300
6.160
9.000
0.765
0.731
74/02/28
15 00
0.920
13.000
6.400
9.500
11.500
0.450
0.422
74/03/31
15 00
0.640
13,000
2.300
8.200
10.uOO
0.544
0.526
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4701EA AS47O1EA P001980
36 51 30.0 087 50 00.0 4
CAOIZ (t(Et 1TUCKY)
‘ .7 T UGG Co -i Y MAP
T/i3ARKL(V LAKE 052091
LITTLE PI ER
I IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 03
00630
00625
00610
00671
0066
50051
500S3
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3
TOT
KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—OIS
PHOS-TOT
FLOe
CONDUIT
FWOM
O
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
URTHO
RATE
FLO —MGD
TO
DAY
FEET
M0/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
PIG/L P
INST MD L)
HONFrILY
73/04/16
11
00
CP(T)—
0.300
5.100
0.640
17.000
17.J00
0.092
0.090
73/34/16
lb
00
73/05/17
11
00
CP(T)—
0.085
24.000
11.700
12.000
15.700
0.108
0.097
73/05/17
16
00
73/06/1’.
11
15
CP(T)—
0.048
26.700
1.470
16.000
0.096
0.110
73/06/14
15
30
73/07/16
10
45
CP(T)—
0.010K
32.000
18.000
6.800
13.500
0.096
0.102
731)7/16
15
50
73/08/14
10
30
CP(T)—
0.130
3.200
0.160
4.300
10.500
0.115
0.098
73/08/14
15
30
73/09/13
11
00
CP(T)—
0.025
2.600
0.147
16.000
16.000
0.09’.
0.099
73/09/13
16
05
73/10/03
10
55
0.060
6.700
0.170
32.000
0.089
0.094
73/11/08
10
55
CPCT)—
0.420
18.500
8.200
4.400
12.800
0.088
0.092
73/11/08
15
50
73/12/11
10
55
CP(T)—
11.600
3.700
0.130
15.000
20.000
0.090
0.094
73/12/11
15
35
74/0 1/U
10
30
CP(T)—
11.200
4.800
0.500
9.900
13.500
0.096
0.092
74/0 1/Il
15
30
74/02/11
10
55
CP(T)—
0.088
0.094
74/02/11
15
30
74/03/11
10
20
CP(T)—
0.040
11.000
0.067
0.450
12.500
0.112
0.092
74/03/11
15
15
74/04/11
10
30
CP(T)—
0.120
2.700
1.400
11.500
15.700
0.089
0.094
74/04/11
15
30
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS TiiAN IL DICATEO
-------
STORET - ETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470121 AS470121 P000635
37 04 00.0 088 08 15.0 4
cUTTAWA, KENTUCPcEY
‘.7 LA SE 8ARI(LtY
1/LAPSE BARKLE( 052092
POPLA CREEPS
I1EPALES 214120’.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT P(JEL NH3—N PrtOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOw CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGI)
TO DAY FEET MG/L P4G/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
73/08/31 11 00
CP(T)- 0.034 45.000 19.000 0.090 0.09’.
73/08/31 16 00
73/09/30 11 00
CP(T)— 0.040 38.000 11.800 20.000 23.000 0.080 0.063
73/09/30 16 00
73/10/31 11 00
CP(T)— 0.070 36.000 15.800 17.900 18.000 0.090 0.073
73/10/31 16 00
73/11/30 11 00
CP(T)— 0.090 23.000 4.900 8.800 12.500 0.090 0.09’.
73/11/30 16 00
73/12/31 11 00
CP(T)— 0.220 16.000 2.080 6.720 9.100 0.090 0.080
73/12/31 16 00
74/01/31 11 00
CP(T)— 0.080 13.000 3.400 4.400 7.200 0.090 0.080
74/01/31 16 00
74/03/02 U 00
CP(T)— 0.040 27.000 9.100 13.000 18.000 0.080 0.070
74/03/02 16 00
74/04/01 11 00
CP(T)— 0.080 9.000 1.900 3.380 5.800 0.080 0.090
74/04/01 16 00
74/05/01 11 00
CP(T)— 0.040 26.000 9.450 10.000 13.000 0.080 0.070
74/05/01 16 00
74/06/10 11 00
CP(T)— 0.040 23.000 7.200 6.500 9.480 0.075 0.090
74/06/10 16 00
74/07/04 11 00
CP(T)— 0.040 24.000 12.500 12.000 16.500 0.090 0.080
74/07/04 16 00
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF TENNESSEE
-------
LA L LAT ro ‘RE. u E 1’s
‘ u1 . MEi)IA’ . S00— ‘ E N L1) I
CODE L ’ .’cE NAME k \ MEAN 1C C LJ
‘.70 1 L4 (E BAP KLEi 0. C 473 . ,3 I 12.7 23 I0. ’ .OfJ
‘.704 4’)UME . ESERVOi O.0 5 ‘ .‘.2.011 11.415 l4. 00
470t CriLATrtAM E ERVOI 0.142 0.”b O 473.800 8.160 ‘ .ã00 0.O ’.
‘ .707 C-ILRO,cEE LAf(E 0.051 0.780 44r3.bbl 12.162 15.000 0.022
4708 C, I1CIcAMAUGA LA’ E 0.031 0.440 463.b33 3.111 v.600 0.012
4711 )OUGLAS LM’
-------
PEPCEP T F i icEs P-41 h R VALJ S :N1. M3E Dr L.’ i\ES LTh -4i ruE VcLUL’
1NL)E
LI KE NAME
TOTAL P
1NO Qc’
N
ME. SEC
ChLJI A
‘UN
üti
JISS O, TrO p
4701
LAKE 3APKLEY
13 4
2)
“0 (
6)
13 4
2)
7
1)
73 4
11)
13 (
2)
159
4704
BOONE RESE VOI
.O 4
6)
0
0)
73 (
11)
(
3)
47 4
7)
.J)
i?00
4706
CHEATHAM RESERVOI )
7 4
1)
47 4
7)
7 (
1)
40 4
b)
90 C
13)
0 (
0)
191
4707
CHEROKEE LAKE
50
7)
7 4
1)
53 4 8)
13 4
2)
13 4
0)
‘.0 4
6)
176
4708
CHICKAWAUGA LAKE
67 4
10)
63 4
9)
33 ( 5)
93 4
14)
90 4
13)
70 C 10)
416
4711
DOUGLAS LAKE
73 1
11)
63 4
9)
bl ( 10)
0 4
12)
13 C
0)
60 ( 9)
356
4112
FORT LOUDON RESERVOIR
33 4
5)
20 (
3)
27 C 4)
73 (
11)
60 4
9)
27 4 4)
240
4713
GREAT FALLS LAKE
87 4
13)
73 C
11)
60 1 9)
87 4
13)
40 4 6)
93 1 14)
440
4717
NICKAJACK RESEP VOIR
50 4
7)
33 1
5)
47 C 7)
100 4
15)
80 C 12)
33 4 5)
343
4720
OLD HICKORY LAKE
20 C
3)
80 C
12)
20
4 3)
33 4
5)
100 ( 15)
53 ( 8)
306
4722
WATTS BAR RESERVOIR
60 (
9)
27 (
4)
40
C 6)
67 4
10)
67 C 10)
70
4 10)
331
4723
J. PERCY PRIEST ESERVOI
27 4
4)
100 4
15)
80
1 12)
27 4
4)
13 4 0)
47
4 7)
294
‘.724
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
80 (
12)
53 C
8)
100
4 15)
60 4
9)
33
4 5)
80
4 12)
406
4725
SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE
100 4
15)
13 C
2)
93
4 14)
47 1
7)
13
( 0)
87
4 13)
353
4727
REELFOOT LAKE
0 4
0)
3 (
14)
0
4 0)
0 (
0)
53
4 8)
7
4 1)
153
4728 WOODS RESERVOI’
93 4 14) 87 ( 13) 87 4 13) 53 4 8)
13 4 0) 100 C 15) 433
-------