U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CHEROKE LAKE
JEFERSOli HAfBLEN, GRAINGER,
AMD HAWKINS COIMIES
TENNESSE
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
CHERDKEE LAKE
JEFFERSON, HAf-BLEN, GRAINGER,
AND HWKINS COUNTIES
TENNESSE
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No,
UlTH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
AND THE
TENNESSEE NATIONAL GUARD
SEPTEMBER 1976
-------
i
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Study Lakes - Tennessee iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 18
VI. Appendices 19
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated In 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoi rs.
OBJ ECT IV ES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement In lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Surveys eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an.operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
plannin9 [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
L 303(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ 1O6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, niultivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by
lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.5 . Environmental
Protection Agency and to augment plans implementation by the
states.
ACKNOWLED( MENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Tennessee Department
of Public Health for professional involvement, to the Tennessee
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase
of the Survey, and to those Tennessee wastewater treatment
plant operators who provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Quality Control, Tennessee
Department of Public Health; the Division of Environmental
Planning, Tennessee Valley Authority; and the Nashville District
Corps of Engineers provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General William C. Smith, former Adjutant General
of Tennessee, and Project Officer Colonel Wilburn C. Johnson,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Tennessee National
Guardsnen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
LAKE NAME
Barki ey
Boone
Cheatham
Cherokee
Ch I ckamauga
Dougl as
Fort Loudon
Great Falls
Ni ckajack
Old Hickory
Percy Priest
Reelfoot
South Hoiston
Tims Ford
Watts Bar
COUNTY
Stewart, Montgomery
(Trigg, Lyon in KY)
Washington, Sullivan,
Carter
Cheatharn, Davidson
Jefferson, Hamblen,
Grainger, Hawkins
Hamilton, Rhea, Meigs,
McMinn
Sevier, Jefferson, Cocke
Loudon, Knox, Blount
White, Van Buren
Marion, Hamilton
Sumner, Davidson, Wilson,
Smith, Trousdale
Davidson, Rutherford
Obion
Sullivan (Washington in
VA)
Moore, Franklin
Rhea, Meigs, Cumberland,
Roane, Loudon
Franklin, Coffee
Woods (Elk River)
-------
CHEROKEE RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
, Sewage Treatment
0
Facility
°Km.
Li
Map Location
Greerwi lie
-------
REPORT ON CHEROKEE LAKE, TENNESSEE
STORET NO. 4707
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Cherokee Lake is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and highly productive, on the basis of field observations
and analysis of Survey data. Whether such nutrient enrichment
is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is determined by
its actual or potential impact upon designated beneficial water
uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a levels ranged from 2.1 pg/i to 24.3 pg/i,
with a mean of 12.2 pg/i. Water clarity was low, being turbid
and greenish-brown in color. Of the 16 Tennessee lakes sampled
in 1973, 7 had higher median total phosphorus, 1 had higher
median inorganic nitrogen, and 6 had higher median orthophos-
phorus levels than Cherokee Lake. Dissolved oxygen concentra-
tions were seriously depressed with depth during the summer
sampling. According to Nicholas and Gordon (1972), Cherokee
Lake has the worst dissolved oxygen regime of any Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA) reservoir due to the excessive influx
of reduced carbon and nitrogen from the Hoiston River.
Survey limnologists reported a brown surface scum and much
surface debris over portions if the lake during spring sampling.
*See Appendix E.
-------
2
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Cherokee Lake was limited
in primary production by available phosphorus levels. The ratios
of available inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P ratios
were 15/1 or greater on all sampling occasions) in sampled waters
further indicate phosphorus limitation.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from point sources iden-
tified within 40 stream-km (25 miles) of Cherokee Lake was
estimated to be 7.4% of the total lake phosphorus load. The
city of Morristown contributed 5.0% of the total, Jefferson
contributed 1.5%, and Rogersville, 0.9%.
The present overall phosphorus loading rate of 3.83 g
P/m 2 /yr is about 3.5 times that proposed by Vollenweider (1975)
as “eutrophic” for lakes with such volume and hydraulic reten-
tion time. The load includes other large discharges of nutri-
ent rich domestic and industrial wastes which exist further
upstream in the Holston River system and substantially influence
the lake (Brye, 1970). Recent studies (EPA, 1972), which have
identified these sources and quantified the waste treatment re-
qul ements for the Upper Holston River, indicate that reduction
or elimination of point source loadings to Cherokee Lake would
result in water quality improvement in the lake.
-------
3
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load not attributable to
nearby point sources was about 92.6% of the total reaching
the lake. The Hoiston River accounted for 87.8% of the
total phosphorus load, and the ungaged drainage areas were
estimated to have contributed 2.0%.
The high loading rate of the Hoiston River, as it
enters Cherokee Lake, is largely due to unmeasured nutri-
ent discharges from the Kingsport area upstream from Chero-
kee Lake, rather than nonpoint contributions. Waste sources
from this region include the Kingsport Municipal Sewage
Treatment Plant, the Holliston Mills plant, the Hoiston Army
Ammunition Plant, the Mead Paper Company, and the Tennessee
Eastman Corporation (EPA, 1972). These sources were not in-
cluded in the National Eutrophication Survey (NES) sampling
of Cherokee Lake due to their distance from the reservoir.
Ernest Roberts (personal communication, 1976) of the Knox-
ville Tennessee Department of Public Health indicates that
only approximately 4.0% of the total phosphorus load reaching
the lake is from nonpoint sources; the TVA (1973) states that
in terms of “stream-kilometers affected”, the Holston River
basin is the most seriously polluted in the Tennessee River
Valley.
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometry data and hydraulic retention times were provided
by the Tennessee Valley Authority; tributary flow and drainage
areas were provided by the Tennessee District Office of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes the lake
surface area. Drainage area for tributary F(l), Spring Creek,
was provided by the Tennessee Valley Authority. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
mean flow of the outlet. Tributary drainage areas plus the lake
surface area do not equal the outlet drainage area probably be-
cause of differences in the pool elevations, used by the different
sources in their calculations. Precipitation values are estimated
by methods as outlined in NES Working Paper No. 175. A table of
metric/English conversions is included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry
1. Surface area: 122.62 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 14.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 49.7 me ers.
4. Volume: 1,900.824 x 10° m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 178 days.
-------
5
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage -
Drainage
area(km 2 )
Mean flow
( m 3 /sec )
546.2 7.33
Totals
8,759.4 120.65
2. Outlet - A(2) Holston River
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 154.6 cm.
2. Mean annual: 116.6 cm.
8,878.5 115.98
B
D
F l
Gi
I - f l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Floiston River
7,795.9
107.76
Caney Creek
59.6
0.80
Cloud’s Creek
45.1
0.59
Poor Valley Creek
139.6
1.82
Turkey Creek
49.5
0.70
Spring Creek
19.4
0.45
Robertson Creek
47.9
0.57
Louderback Creek
56.2
0.63
-------
6
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Cherokee Lake was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical
parameters were collected from seven stations on the lake
and from a number of depths at each station (see map, page I).
During each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected
from each station for chlorophyll a analysis and phytoplankton
identification and enumeration. During the first visit, two
18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were composited for algal
assays. Maximum depths sampled were 40.2 meters at Station 1,
37.5 meters at Station 2, 34.4 meters at Station 3, 15.2 meters
at Station 4, 29.0 meters at Station 5, 19.2 meters at Station
6, and 13.7 meters at Station 7. For a more detailed explana-
tion of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B
and are summarized in Ill-A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton
counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in Ill-B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in Ill-C.
-------
• N • NO. OF SAMPLES
•° MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
•° S NO. OF SiTES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
I 5/24/73
MAX
= 7 DEPTH
RANGE
N° RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
I 8/23/73
MAX
S •* = 7 DEPTH
RANGE
N. RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
10/27/73 I
MAX
50.0 = 7 DEPTH
RANGE
N• RANGE MEDIAN (METERS)
CHEROKEE LAKE
SIORET CODE 4707
PHYSICAL
AND CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE (DEG CENT)
o.—.5 U DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH°• 7
18.4— 58.0
12.1— 17.9
30.3
13.2
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
8
7
26.4— 70.0
16.2— 25.8
50.0
20.1
0.0—
10.1
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (MG/L)
0.—I.5 U DEPTH 7
MAX DEPTH° 0 7
7.6— 11.8
2.0— 4.6
9.3
4.1
1.2— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
6.4— 9.0
0.0— 4.6
7.0
0.1
0.0—
10.1—
CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS)
0.—I.5 U DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH 7
260.— 290.
260.— 300.
273.
285.
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
8
7
231.— 288.
232.— 288.
243.
25).
0.0—
10.1—
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
0.-I.S H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH° 7
8.3— 9.0
7.5— 7.7
8.8
7.6
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
8.0— 9.0
7.0— 8.4
8.7
7.3
0.0—
10.1—
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/LI
0.-I.5 H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH•’ 7
85.— 107.
92.— 127.
92.
98.
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
75.— 88.
78.— 123.
76.
1)4.
0.0
10.1
TOTAL P (MG/LI
0.-l.S M DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH° 7
0.025—0.114
0.032—0.152
0.045
0.057
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
0.013—0.097
0.029—0.477
0.024
0.226
0.0—
10.1—
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (HG/LI
0.-I.5 M DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH • 7
0.004—0.02)
0.008—0.127
0.010
0.037
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
0.006—0.033
0.0)5—0.319
0.014
0.110
0.0—
10.1—
NOZ.N03 (MG/L)
0.-I.S H UEPTN 14
MA DEPTH 00 7
0.530—0.780
0.670—1.290
0.630
0.820
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.)
7
7
0.060—0.800
0.060—0.830
0.240
0.110
0.0
10.1—
AMMONIA (MG/LI
0.—I.S H DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH’• 7
0.030—0.110
0.030—0.660
0.080
0.220
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
0.070—0.130
0.090—2.110
0.100
1.400
0.0—
10.1—
KJELDAHL N (MG/LI
0.—I.S U DEPTH 14
MAX DEPTH 7
0.400—0.800
0.200—1.000
0.650
0.400
0.0— 1.2
13.7— 38.1
7
7
0.500—0.900
0.400—3.100
0.800
1.900
0.0—
10.1—
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
0
• *9 . . 0*
*0000
0
•0*.* 0D*.O
0*000
1.5
40.2
0.0
40.2
1.5
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
0.0
40.2
14 19.8— 60.0
7 19.7— 21.2
7 4.4— 9.0
7 0.8— 7.8
14 230.— 295.
7 244.— 302.
14 7.5— 8.8
7 7.3— 8.2
14 77.— 95.
7 82.- 95.
14 0.025—0.197
7 0.031—0.133
14 0.012—0.056
7 0.017—0.059
14 0.400—0.910
7 0.220—0.880
14 0.040—0.130
7 0.060—0.540
14 0.300—1.400
7 0.400—1.000
0
0.0—
6.1—
1 • 5—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
0.0—
6.1—
28.9
20 • 0
6.6
4.4
246.
258.
7.9
7.5
84.
88.
0.063
0.070
0.023
0.029
0.595
0.650
0.050
0.180
0.600
0.600
00000
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
‘.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
1.5
33.8
-------
8
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. PhytoplanktOn -
Al gal
Sampling Dominant Units
Date Genera per ml
05/24/73 1. Flagellates 1,486
2. Melosira 1,340
3. Cyclotella 801
4. Scenedesmus 671
5. Nitzschia 248
Other genera 469
Total 5,015
08/23/73 1. RaphidiopsiS 28,561
2. Cyclotella 1,219
3. Flagellates 1,045
4. Tetraedron 435
5. Synedra 305
Other genera 1 ,045
Total 32,610
10/27/73 1. Flagellates 2,162
2. Melosira 713
3. StephanodiScus 356
4. Mesostigma 143
5. DactylococcoPSiS 95
Other genera 408
Total 3,877
-------
9
2. Chlorophyll a
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( jig/l )
05/24/73 1 5.5
2 15.6
3 7.8
4 5.0
5 18.2
6 17.3
7 20.1
08/23/73 1 11.4
2 12.1
3 13.8
4 9.9
5 16.9
6 14.7
7 16.4
10/27/73 1 2.1
2 7.3
3 4.6
4 13.2
5 8.3
6 24.3
7 10.9
-------
10
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autociaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum Yield
pike (mg/i) Conc.(mg/l) Conc.(mg/1) ( mg/i-dry wt. )
Stations 1, 2 & 3:
Control 0.008 0.930 0.1
0.05 p 0.058 0.930 10.6
0.05 p + 1.0 N 0.058 1.930 15.0
1.00 N 0.008 1.930 0.2
Stations 4, 5, 6 & 7:
Control 0.016 0.906 4.3
0.05 P 0.066 0.906 7.6
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.066 1.906 15.9
1.00 N 0.016 1.906 4.1
2. Discussion —
The control yields of the assay alga, Seienastrum
capricornutum , indicate that the potential for primary
production in Cherokee Lake was low at the time of
sampling at Stations 1, 2, and 3, and was moderately
high at Stations 4, 5, 6, and 7 (probably due to the
proximity of Station 5 to the Morristown sewage treat-
ment discharge point). The increase in yield produced
by the addition of orthophosphate spikes indicates
phosphorus limitation. The simultaneous addition of
nitrogen and phosphorus produced substantial increases
in yield over the addition of phosphorus alone. No
growth response accompanied spikes of nitrogen alone.
-------
11
An overall inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus
ratio of 40:1 prevailed in the lake on the assay
sampling date, substantiating the assay indication of
phosphorus limitation (a minimum N:P ratio of 14:1 is
necessary for phosphorus limitation to occur). On
subsequent sampling dates in August and October, the
overall N:P ratios were 15:1 and 26:1, respectively,
suggesting the maintenance of a phosphorus limited
situation. Although August N:P ratios at sites 04
and 05 were indicative of nitrogen limitation if
computed over the entire water column, the photic
zone probably remained phosphorus limited in both
cases.
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Tennessee
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff month of February when two samples were
collected. Sampling was begun in April 1973, and was completed
in March 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were pro-
vided by the Tennessee District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for all sampled tributaries
were determined by using a modification of a USGS computer pro-
gram for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated
for tributaries are those measured minus known point source loads,
if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS) were estimated by using the means
of the nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /yr, for Caney Creek, Cloud’s
Creek, Poor Valley Creek, Robertson Creek, and Louderback Creek
at Stations 8(1), C(l), D(l), G(l), and H(l), and by multiplying
the means by the appropriate area in km 2 .
-------
13
The operators of the Jefferson and Morristown waste-
water treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and
corresponding flow data. Nutrient loads for the city of
Rogersville wastewater treatment plant were estimated at
1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop. Me n Flow Receiving
Name Served* Treatment* ( m 3 /d x lO ) Water*
Jefferson 6,159 Trickling 2.056 Mossey Creek
filter embayment at
Cherokee
Reservoir
Rogersville 3,744 Activated 1.417** Crockett
sludge Creek
Morristown 19,000 Primary 8.826 Turkey Creek
2. Known industrial - See discussion, page 3.
*Tennessee Department of Public Health (manuscript).
**Estimated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.
-------
14
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load)
A(l) Holston River 412,485 87.8
B(l) Caney Creek 1,035 0.2
C(l) Cloud’s Creek 1,035 0.2
D(l) Poor Valley Creek 1,145 0.2
E(l) Turkey Creek 4,830 1.0
F(l) Spring Creek 1,180 0.3
G(l) Robertson Creek 555 0.1
H(l) Louderback Creek 1,370 0.3
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 9,285 2.0
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Jefferson 6,835 1.5
Rogersvi lle 4,245 0.9
Morristown 23,625 5.0
d. Septic tanks* - 30 <0.1
e. Known industrial — See discussion,
page 3.
f. Direct precipitation** - 2,145 0.5
Totals 469,800 100.0
2. Outlet - A(2) Holston River 174,735
3. Net annual P accumulation - 295,065
*Estimate based on 100 lakeside residences and 4 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
15
A(l)
B(l)
C(l)
0(1)
E(l)
F(l)
G(1)
H(l)
Hoiston River
Caney Creek
Cloud’s Creek
Poor Valley Creek
Turkey Creek
Spring Creek
Robertson Creek
Louderback Creek
kg N/yr
6,074,340
28,440
25,435
59,580
55,880
34,075
28,350
25,380
% of
total
89.0
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.4
d. Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial - See discussion,
page 3.
f. Direct precipitation** -
Totals
2. Outlet - A(2) Holston River
132,380
6,826,440
6,402,390
1.9
100.0
3. Net annual N accumulation -
424,050
*Estjmate base on 100 lakeside residences and 4 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Source
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) -
c. Known municipal STP’s -
Jefferson
Rogersvi lie
Morristown
274,190. 4.0
9,100
12,735
65,350
0.1
0.2
1.0
1,205 <0.1
-------
16
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
A(l) Holston River 53 779
B(1) Caney Creek 17 477
C(l) Cloud’s Creek 23 564
D(1) Poor Valley Creek 8 427
E(I) Turkey Creek 98 1,129
F(l) Spring Creek 61 1,756
G(1) Robertson Creek 12 592
H(1) Louderback Creek 24 452
-------
17
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (1975). Essen-
tially, his ueutrophicl loading is that at which the receiving
waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his “oligo-
trophic” loading is that which would result in the receiving
water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if mor-
phometry permitted. A “mesotrophic” loading would be consi-
dered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphoru Loading
(g/m’/yr)
Estimated loading for Cherokee Lake 3.83
Vollenweider’s “eutrophic” loading 1.06
Vollenweider’s “oligotrophic” loading 0.53
-------
18
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Brye, Bruce A. 1970. Summary of Observed Nutrient Concentrations
and Nutrient Entrapment in TVA Reservoirs. In: TVA Activities
Related to Study and Control of Eutrophication in the Tennessee
Valley. Papers discussed at meeting of the Joint Industry/
Government Task Force on Eutrophication. National Fertilizer
Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama.
Nicholas, William R. and John A. Gordon. 1972. Effects of
Impoundments on Water Quality. Observations of Several
Mechanisms of DO Depletion. Presented at the 1972 ASCE
Annual and National Environmental Engineering Meeting,
Houston, Texas, October 16-22, 1972.
Roberts, Ernest H. 1976. Personal communication (review of
preliminary reports, point sources to Cherokee Lake).
Tennessee Department of Public Health, Division of Water
Quality Control, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Tennessee Department of Public Health (manuscript). Water
Quality Management Plan for the Hoiston River Basin. October
1972. Division of Water Quality Control.
Tennessee Valley Authority. 1973. Water Quality in the Tennessee
Valley. Division of Environmental Planning, Water Quality Branch,
Paper #E-WQ-73-l. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1972. Water Quality and
Waste Treatment Requirements on the Upper Hoiston River,
Kingsport, Tennessee to Cherokee Reservoir. EPA Region IV,
Surveillance and Analysis Division, Athens, Georgia.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophica-
tion Survey 1ethods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. National
Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Pacific
Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R.A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CO VERS ION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic ti eters x 8.107 x 1O = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR IENNESSEE
09/13/76
LAKE CODE 4707
CIIEROI
-------
TRI8IJTAPY FL0 INFOkMATION FOP T ’NNESSE 09/13/76
LAKE COUE 4707 C4EROKEE E EI VO11
i I [ AN MONTr4LY FLOWS AND L)AILY FLOWS(CMS)
TPI8UIAPY UONT I YEA’ MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW oar FLO. DAY FLOW
7 7N1 4 73 1.337 15 0.782
5 73 1.642 16 0.702
6 73 0.467 20 0.286
7 73 0.328 23 0.262
8 73 0.685 24 0.179
9 73 0.132 21 0.121
10 73 0.118 18 0.088
I I 73 1.708 21 0.648
12 73 1.940 19 0.317
74 4.559 18 1.308
2 74 1.693 8 1.362 22 1.928
3 74 1.538 8 0.648 22 5.465
4707C 1 4 73 1.011 15 0.592
5 73 1.240 16 0.532
6 73 C.354 20 0.217
7 73 0.249 23 0.198
8 73 0.518 24 0.147
9 73 0.099 21 0.092
10 73 0.089 18 0.067
I I 73 1.291 21 0.490
12 73 1.470 19 0.240
I 74 3.455 18 0.991
2 74 1.28) 8 1.031 22 1.458
3 74 1.164 8 O.4 0 22 4.134
4 73 3.115 14 2.226
S 73 3.851 16 1.648
6 73 1.099 20 0.671
7 73 0.770 23 0.614
8 73 1.603 24 0.419
9 73 0.309 21 0.283
10 73 0.276 18 0.2 16
11 73 3.993 21 1.518
12 73 4.559 19 0.742
74 10.675 lB 3.058
74 3.964 8 3.200 22 4.531
3 74 3.596 8 1.518 22 12.799
‘ .7 )7 l 4 73 0.309 15 0.600
5 73 1.416 16 0.541
73 0.36? 20 0.286
7 73 0.213 23
8 73 0.394 24 0.124
9 73 3.105 21 0.096
I) 73 0.096 18 0.060
II 73 1.065 21 C. 541
I? 73 1.385 19 0.207
I 74 3.115 lb 0.850
7 74 1.325 8 1.022 2? 1.699
3 74 1.634 .i 0.891 2? 3.964
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR IENNESSEE 09/13/76
LAKE CODE 6707 CHEROKEE RESERVOIR
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS(CHS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4707F1 4 73 0.750 15 0.391
5 73 0.920 16 0.351
6 73 0.235 20 0.186
7 73 0.138 23 0.123
8 73 0.256 24 0.081
9 73 0.068 21 0.063
10 73 0.063 18 0.039
I I 73 0.691 21 0.351
12 73 0.898 19 0.134
1 74 2.022 18 0.552
2 74 0.861 18 0.861 22 1.102
3 74 1.059 8 0.450 22 2.571
470701 4 73 1.121 15 0.580
5 73 1.373 16 0.524
6 73 0.351 20 0.278
7 73 0.206 23 0.183
R 73 0.382 24 0.121
9 73 0.102 21 0.093
10 73 0.093 18 0.058
Ii 73 1.031 21 0.524
12 73 1.342 19 0.200
1 74 3.030 18 0.821
2 74 1.283 18 1.283 22 1.645
3 7 ’. 1.583 8 0.671 22 3.823
47Q7rU 4 73 1.314 Is 0.682
5 73 1.608 16 0.614
6 73 0.411 20 0.326
7 73 0.242 23 0.203
8 73 0.447 24 0.141
9 73 0.119 21 0.109
10 73 0.109 18 0.068
11 73 1.209 21 0.6)4
12 73 1.57’. 19 0.235
1 74 3.540 18 0.966
2 74 1.506 18 1.506 22 1.928
3 74 1.855 8 0.787 22 4.502
‘ .707 1 1 4 73 15.263
5 73 18.689
6 73 4.786
7 73 2.803
8 73 5.210
9 73 1.385
10 73 1.271
LI 73 14.045
12 73 18.264
1 74 41.059
2 7’. 17.471
3 74 21.549
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470701
36 09 57.0 083 29 45.0 3
CrIEHOOcEE LAKE
47057 TENNESSEE
01E, ALES 2111202
0130 FEEl DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVV Pr 1 I ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO] TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTH )
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICHOMNO SU MG/L MU/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/05/24 10 25 0000 18.4 56 290 8.40 99 0.080 0.800 0.750 0.006
10 25 0004 18.4 8.0 270 8.30 98 0.080 0.500 0.780 0.005
10 25 0015 18.1 7.6 270 8.00 97 0.090 0.500 0.790 0.005
10 25 0030 17.2 6.4 270 7.80 97 0.060 0.600 1.040 0.009
10 25 0050 14.7 6.4 280 7.70 99 0.060 0.200 1.090 0.008
10 25 0000 12.7 5.8 285 7.60 98 0.050 0.200 1.280 0.034
10 25 0125 12.1 4.6 285 7.50 98 0.040 0.200 1.280 0.035
73/08/23 03 45 0000 27.5 1.8 66 238 8.90 75 0.070 0.500 0.190 0.006
13 65 0015 26.8 235
13 45 0030 26.7 7.2 235 8.40 72 0.010 0.300 0.180 0.010
13 45 0050 25.1 272
13 45 0060 24.3 0.1 270 7.60 97 0.280 0.600 0.150 0.013
13 45 0075 23.1 263
13 45 0090 21.5 0.1 255 7.50 101 0.340 0.700 0.090 0.026
13 45 0120 07.8 233
13 45 0132 16.2 0.0 236 7.30 114 1.400 0.900 0.090 0.100
13/10/27 12 44 0000 20.9 56 233 7.50 79 0.050 0.400 0.420 0.008
12 44 0005 21.8 4.4 233 7.50 77 0.050 0.300 0.410 0.026
12 44 0015 21.8 4.4 232 7.50 79 0.050 0.300 0.420 0.019
02 44 0050 21.7 4.4 233 7.50 80 0.060 0.300 0.410 0.019
12 44 0090 20.5 1.0 250 7.30 83 0.110 0.500 0.510 0.023
12 44 0111 21.2 0.8 250 7.30 95 0.540 1.000 0.220 0.023
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO UAY FEET MG/L UG/L
73/05/24 10 7S 0000 0.035 5.5
10 25 0004 0.025
10 25 0015 0.025
10 25 0030 0.021
10 25 0050 0.020
00 25 0100 0.043
00 25 0125 0.053
73/08/23 13 ‘S 0000 0.0 13 11.4
13 65 0030 0.018
13 45 0060 0.024
I) ‘.5 0090 0.034
03 45 0132 0.237
73/00/27 12 44 0000 J.026 2.1
12 44 0005 0.025
12 44 0015 0.024
12 44 0050 0.023
12 44 0090 0.039
12 64 olIl 0.063
-------
STOPET ETR1EVAL DATE 78/0 /10
470 702
36 12 40.0 083 75 52.0 3
CriERVi EE LAId
47057 I I1NESSEE
I IEPALES 2111202
0125 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
uOOIO 00300 00077 03096 00’.00 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TINE DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDOCTVY P8 T ALK NIi3—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS-DIS
FRON OF Ft I4P SECCHI FIELO CACO3 TOTAL N N-TOTAL 08180
TO UAY FEET CENT 4G/L INCHES MIC4OMHO SU MG/L I4&,/L !46/L UG/L Mb/L P
73/OS/2’. ii ‘S 0000 20.9 50 265 9.00 87 0.060 0.800 0.630 0.014
11 25 0004 20.4 11.2 260 9.u O 87 0.040 0.700 0.650 0.016
II 75 0015 19.5 9.0 260 8.60 86 0.050 0.500 0.690 0.006
12 25 0025 17.6 6.0 270 6.00 86 0.140 0.600 0.770 0.007
II 25 0075 13.1 4.8 270 7.80 85 0.040 0.400 0.035
I I S oIls 12.4 4.6 285 7.63 92 0.030 0.300 1.290 0.040
73/00/23 14 10 0000 27.5 7.0 70 237 8.90 15 0.110 0.800 0.180 0.013
14 30 0015 26.4 240
14 10 0040 26.’. 5.8 244 8.00 75 0.120 O.oOO 0.190 0.024
14 30 0060 24.4 275
14 30 0080 21.9 C.I 260 98 3.480 1.000 0.220 0.040
14 30 0100 19.1 242
14 30 0123 17.5 (,.l 250 7.30 118 1.490 2.300 0.080 0.117
73/10/27 13 If’ 0000 21.8 60 231 7.80 79 0.040 0.600 0.400 0.014
I) lb 0005 22.7 6.0 230 l .lu 82 0.050 0.300 0.410 0.012
13 16 0015 21.7 5.6 230 7.60 82 0.040 0.400 0.410 0.012
II 14 0030 21.6 5.6 231 7.60 83 0.030 0.300 0.420 0.013
13 16 0070 21.1 3.6 243 7.43 87 0.080 0.400 0.580 0.021
13 lb 0100 20.8 2.0 251 7.30 88 0.220 0.600 0.560 0.026
00665 32217
DATE TINE DLPTM P805—TOT CHLWPIIYL
FHOM OF
TO 08Y FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/0 /2 ’. II 25 0000 1.059 15.6
11 75 0006 0.052
11 25 00l 0.029
II 25 0025 3.028
II 25 007 0.052
Ii 75 0115 3.057
73/C,8/23 1 ’. 30 0000 0.Oil 12.1
14 30 040 3.030
24 30 0083 .0SJ
14 30 0123 0.228
73/10/27 13 lb 0000 j.03’. 7.3
13 16 0005 0.031
13 lb 0015 0.078
13 lb 0030 0.025
13 lb 0070 0.043
13 lb 0100 0.070
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
‘.70703
36 lb 22.0 083 21 47.0 3
CHEROKEE LAKE
47057 TENNESSEE
040292
I IEPALES 2111202
0065 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TiME OCPT .1 HATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02 NO3 PHOSDIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTIIO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/ I . M u/I. MG/I. MG/I. MG/L P
73/05/24 12 10 0000 20.5 58 275 8.70 92 0.080 0.500 0.640 0.005
12 10 0004 20.2 7.6 275 8.60 92 0.080 0.400 0.630 0.004
12 10 0015 20.1 7.5 265 8.70 92 0.080 0.500 0.640 0.005
12 10 0030 19.4 6.1 265 8.00 94 0.240 0.500 0.740 0.015
12 10 0040 16.2 4.2 275 7.80 95 0.270 0.500 0.780 0.021
12 10 0060 13.7 4.1 285 7.10 98 0.140 0.400 1.100 0.035
73/08/23 15 05 0000 26.8 6.8 45 247 8.70 76 0.100 0.800 0.240 0.010
IS 05 0015 26.4 249
15 05 0030 26.2 3.8 253 78 0.120 0.600 0.300 0.019
15 05 0045 24.8 272
15 05 0060 23.8 0.1 265 7.30 93 0.380 0.900 0.560 0.041
IS 05 0075 22.4 255
15 05 0090 19.7 0.1 242 7.30 107 0.980 1.500 0.120 0.079
15 05 0113 16.9 0.0 251 7.30 123 1.940 2.700 0.120 0.152
73/10/26 13 ‘53 0000 21.3 60 24’. 7.80 84 0.040 0.600 0.590 0.018
13 53 0005 21.1 6.0 244 7.70 83 0.040 0.500 0.600 0.017
13 53 0015 21.1 5.0 246 7.60 84 0.040 0.600 0.640 0.017
13 ‘53 0030 21.0 4.6 246 7.50 86 0.050 0.500 0.680 0.023
I) 53 0060 2u.9 4.4 252 7.50 86 0.060 0.400 0.700 0.025
13 53 0088 20.5 3.4 258 7.40 89 0.180 0.600 0.650 0.029
00665 32217
DATE TIME OEPIH PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
FROM OF A
TO L)AY FEET MG/I. UG/L
73/OS/2’. 12 10 0000 0.037 7.8
12 10 0004 0.043
12 10 0015 0.037
12 10 0030 3.036
12 10 0040 0.045
12 10 0060 0.050
73/08/23 IS 05 0000 0.018 13.8
15 05 0030 0.028
IS 05 0060 0.059
15 05 0090 ... 1 17
15 OS 0113 3.322
73/10/26 13 53 0000 0.073 4.6
13 53 0005 0.047
13 53 0015 0.037
13 53 0030 0.041
13 53 0060 0.036
13 ‘53 0088 0.079
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470704
36 19 22.0 083 22 02.0 3
CHEROKEE LAKE
47057 TENNESSEE
040292
1 1&ALES
005 ? FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/25 09 ?5 0000
09 25 0004
09 ‘5 0015
09 25 002
09 25 0050
73/08/23 17 10 0000
17 10 0015
17 10 0033
73/10/27 15 47 C000
15 47 0005
15 47 0015
15 47 0020
0.038
0.038
0.033
0.025
0.032
0.02’.
0.022
3.0 29
0.061
0.0 55
0.035
J .0 31
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
0061 )
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
wATER
00
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
T
ALK
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02 NO3
PHOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TIMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHU
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICROMHO
SU
MG/L
M(,/L
MG/I
MG/L
MG/L P
73/05/25
09 25
0000
20.9
51
290
8.60
91
0.110
0.700
0.620
0.005
09 25
0004
20.9
9.3
280
8.60
92
0.080
0.600
0.600
0.004
09 25
0015
20.0
8.0
270
8.30
92
0.170
0.700
0.600
0.008
09 25
002
18.7
6.8
260
7.90
92
0.180
0.600
0.580
0.008
09 25
0050
15.8
3.6
260
7.70
96
0.220
0.400
0.680
0.008
73/08/23
17 10
0000
27.2
6.8
50
232
8.50
76
0.070
0.700
0.060
0.021
17 10
0005
26.4
231
17 10
0015
26.2
5.8
231
8.20
78
0.060
0.300
0.050
0.014
17 ID
0024
26.2
231
17 10
0033
25.8
4.4
232
8.40
78
0.090
0.400
0.060
0.015
73/10/27
15 47
0000
20.6
42
246
8.50
82
0.050
0.800
0.560
0.022
15 47
0005
20.’.
9.0
246
8.50
83
0.040
0.600
0.550
0.019
15 47
0015
19.9
7.6
245
8.20
81
0.060
0.400
0.530
0.017
15 47
0020
19.9
7.6
244
8.20
82
0.060
0.400
0.550
0.017
DATE
TiME
DEPTH
00665
PHOS-TOT
32217
CtILRPHYL
FROM
OF
A
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L P
UG/L
5.0
9.9
13.2
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470705
36 15 42.0 083 17 00.0 3
CHEROKEE LAKE
47057 TENNESSEE
040292
11EPALES 2111202
0096 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK P*43—N TOT KJEL NO2 NO3 PHOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCNI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L HG/L P
73/05/24 16 00 0000 21.5 40 265 8.90 85 0.040 0.700 0.570 0.014
16 00 0004 21.2 11.0 265 8.90 88 0.030 0.600 0.580 0.021
16 00 0015 20.2 8.8 270 8.30 87 0.070 0.500 0.610 0.010
16 00 0025 18.6 6.4 280 7.80 90 0.210 0.600 0.670 0.024
16 00 0050 16.2 4.8 280 7.60 94 0.330 0.700 0.770 0.067
16 00 0070 13.1 3.0 2’ O 7.60 101 0.530 1.000 0.900 0.137
16 00 0095 12.6 2.0 290 7.50 102 0.560 1.000 0.820 0.127
73/08/23 16 30 0000 28.6 9.0 50 266 9.00 75 0.080 0.800 0.370 0.018
16 30 0015 26.7 6.6 259 8.30 74 0.080 0.400 0.390 0.032
16 30 0030 25.7 0.2 284 7.40 90 0.260 0.600 0.780 0.057
16 30 0065 24.6 278
16 30 0060 23.3 0.2 266 7.30 94 0.470 0.800 0.790 0.151
16 30 0082 20.1 0.1 288 7.30 119 2.110 3.100 0.110 0.319
73/10/27 14 20 0000 21.5 39 283 8.20 89 0.050 0.700 0.870 0.025
14 20 0005 21.2 6.6 284 8.00 90 0.040 0.600 0.910 0.026
14 20 0015 20.7 5.6 280 7.70 89 0.060 0.500 0.920 0.028
14 20 0030 20.6 5.2 281 7.6 86 0.090 0.600 0.920 0.038
14 20 0061 20.0 4.4 285 7.50 87 0.310 0.800 0.780 0.045
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT CHLRPPIYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/OS/2 ’. 16 00 0000 3.036 18.2
16 00 0004 0.047
16 00 0015 0.036
16 00 0025 0.040
16 00 0050 0.060
16 00 0070 0.172
16 00 00’ 5 ). 152
73/08/23 16 30 0000 0.036 16.9
16 30 0015 0.047
16 30 0030 0.0d4
16 30 0060 0.16’.
16 30 0082 .).477
73/10/27 14 20 0000 0.123
14 ?0 0005 0.065
14 20 0015 0.060
14 20 0030 0.057
14 20 0061 0.078
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470706
36 19 18.0 083 11 47.0 3
Cr1E OicEE LAicE
47073 TENNESSEE
040292
I IEPALES 2111202
0065 FEET DE ’TPI CLASS 03
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM Of
TO DAY FEET
73/05/24 15 20 0000
15 0 0004
IS 20 0015
15 20 0025
15 ?0 0050
15 20 0063
73/08/2’. 09 50 OuOO
09 50 0015
09 50 0030
09 50 0045
09 50 0059
73/10/27 15 75 0000
15 25 0005
IS 75 0015
15 25 0031
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLPPHYL
A
LJG/ L
17.3
MG/L
0.054
0.055
u.uS1
‘).053
0.061
3.090
0.050
0.055
0.063
0• 103
0.103
0.197
0. 138
0.128
3.133
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
WATER
DO
T ANSP
CNDUCTVY
PH
1 AL
NN3—N
TOT KJEL
NO2 NO3
PHOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
10
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/L
iNCHES
MICROMHO
SO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
M(,/L
HD/L P
73/05/2’.
15 20 0000
21.6
54
260
8.90
96
0.050
0.600
0.530
0.010
IS 20 0004
21.6
[ 1.8
260
8.90
107
0.030
0.400
0.530
0.012
15 20 0015
19.2
7.8
275
8.00
112
0.150
0.400
0.660
0.011
15 20 0025
18.8
7.0
275
7.80
113
0.210
0.500
0.680
0.034
IS 20 0050
16.8
3•4
260
7.70
130
0.420
0.700
0.580
0.037
IS 20 0063
13.2
2.4
300
7.60
127
0.660
1.000
0.710
0.065
73/08/24
09 50 0000
26.5
6.6
60
288
8.00
82
0.120
0.800
0.640
0.014
09 50 0015
26.4
6.0
289
7.90
82
0.120
0.400
0.650
0.022
09 50 0030
25.9
2.8
293
7.60
88
0.280
0.600
0.830
0.042
09 50 0040
24.9
274
09 50 0045
24.6
2.6
265
7.70
92
0.400
0.800
0.760
0.055
09 50 0059
23.6
1.4
257
7.00
95
0. 6O
0.900
0.720
0.052
73/10/27
15 25 0000
20.0
36
295
8.80
8’.
0.100
1.400
0.820
0.052
IS 25 0005
19.8
8.6
294
8.40
85
0.120
0.900
0.830
0.056
15 25 0015
19.7
8.2
300
8.20
85
0.110
0.800
0.870
0.059
15 75 0031
19.7
7.8
302
8.10
86
0.120
0.800
0.880
0.059
14.7
24.3
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
470707
36 21 40.0 083 07 32.0 3
CHEROKEE LAKE
47073 TENNESSEE
040292
I1EPA IES 2111202
0050 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
A
MG/L P IJG/L
73/05/24 14 40 0000
14 40 0004
14 40 0015
14 40 0025
14 40 0045
73/08/24 10 25 0000
10 25 0015
10 25 0024
10 25 0038
73/10/27 1 cs 0000
14 55 0005
14 55 0015
14 S5 0032
0 .098
0.114
0.067
0.072
0 • 101
0.097
0.093
0.113
0 • 132
0.089
C.077
0.075
0.067
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
WATER
00
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
H
T ALK
NPi3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTIIO
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
UG/L
INCHES
MICROMMO
SO
MG/I
MG/I
HG/I
MG/I
MG/I P
73/05/2’.
14 40 0000
21.8
39
280
8.80
95
0.080
0.800
0.650
0.014
14 40 0004
21.6
R.6
285
8.80
9’.
0.100
0.800
0.650
0.010
1’ 40 0015
20.8
8.0
285
8.10
95
0.180
0.600
0.700
0.012
14 40 0025
19.9
6.8
285
7.90
97
0.260
0.700
0.740
0.026
14 40 0045
17.9
4.6
285
7.70
102
0.4o0
0.800
0.670
0.037
73/08/24
10 25 0000
26.0
‘.0
48
280
8.00
88
0.130
0.900
0.800
0.033
10 25 0015
25.9
7.4
279
7.90
88
0.160
0.500
0.790
0.042
10 25 0024
25.2
7.2
303
7.90
90
0.320
0.700
0.820
0.066
10 25 0028
25.1
301
10 25 0038
24.5
4.6
282
7.80
91
0.370
0.800
0.830
0.067
73/10/27
14 55 0000
21.0
48
295
8.30
95
0.110
0.700
0.840
0.040
14 55 0005
20.0
7.4
292
7.90
93
0.130
0.S00
0.840
0.041
14 55 0015
19.9
6.6
291
7.80
91
0.140
0.400
0.820
0.039
14 55 0032
19.8
6.8
292
7.80
90
0.130
0.400
0.810
0.040
20 • 1
16.4
IC .9
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4707A I
36 2? 45.0 082 58 00.0 4
MOLSTON R1VE
47 HAWKINS Co NAP
I/C iEROKEE RES
OUTLET OF DAM JUST
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
040291
N OF MCCLOUD
2111204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
Nr13—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
M /L P
73/04/IS
14
20
0.740
0.780
0.260
0.032
0.090
73 1 )5/16
14
15
0.670
1.100
3.231
0.056
0.150
73/06/20
14
05
0.770
0.840
0.198
0.052
0.110
73/07/23
14
00
I).850
1.470
0.570
0.050
0.135
73/08/24
12
45
0.800
1.000
0.176
0.030
0.110
73/09/21
12
40
0.750
1.050
0.410
0.110
0.210
73/13/18
12
30
0.930
0.800
).036
3.062
3.165
73/11/21
12
45
0.980
0.650
0.168
0.060
0.090
73/12/19
15
00
0.756
1.500
0.200
0.036
0.065
741)1/18
13
40
0.870
0.400
0.088
0.028
0.075
74/02/08
12
45
0.810
0.R00
0.180
0.025
0.105
74/02/??
12
45
0.800
0.800
0.190
0.045
0.120
74/03/08
12
50
0.820
1.400
0.410
0.035
0.085
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 7A2
36 10 07.0 083 30 15.0 4
HOLSTON I ER
47 7.5 JOPPA
T/CME OKEE RES 100691
i v 92 b I)G JUST BELO CHEROlcEE DAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTI-I CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PrIOSDIS PROS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET M6/L MG/I HG/I HG/I P MG/L P
73104/15 09 54 0.850 0.600 0.138 0.015 0.040
73/05/16 09 25 1.000 .100 0.130 0.032 0.050
73/06/20 09 00 1.160 2.500 0.210 0.064 0.070
73/01/23 09 30 0.750 1.900 1.160 0.021 0.035
73/08/24 09 00 0.105 0.840 .46O 0.020 0.040
73/u9/21 09 00 0.310 0.840 0.520 0.037 0.075
73/10/18 09 20 0.357 0.350 0.031 0.013 0.020
73/11/21 09 15 0.710 0.400 0.044 0.020 0.035
73/12/19 9 25 0.820 0.100K 0.052 0.028 0.040
74/01/18 09 10 0.830 0.500 0.168 0.036 0.065
74/02/08 09 00 0.BS O 0.400 0.100 0.025 0.035
74/02/2? 09 iS 0.924 0.400 0.115 0.030 0.035
74/03/08 09 00 0.880 3.300 0.210 0.030 0.055
‘c VALUE KNOWN To t E
LFSS TH41J I’ DIC’ TE1)
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4 70 7 8 1
36 23 40.0 083 04 05.0 4
CAtIEY CREEK
47 HAWKINS Co NAP
T/CHE OK E RES 040292
RD URDG 1 MI N OF HWY 1
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 12 45 0.440 0.240 0.031 0.005K 0.015
73/05/16 12 45 3.610 0.430 0.021 0.012 0.025
13/06/20 11 45 0.670 0.880 0.075 0.015 0.035
73/07/23 12 15 0.700 0.580 0.027 0.029 0.140
73/08/24 11 50 0.590 0.280 0.097 0.013 0.030
73/09/21 11 35 0.350 0.270 0.040 0.027 0.050
73/10/18 11 40 0.069 0.600 0.018 0.011 0.020
73/11/21 12 00 0.072 0.350 0.012 0.032 0.070
73/12/19 12 20 0.830 0.900 0.032 - 0.005 0.012
74/01/18 12 50 0.890 0.300 0.028 0.016 0.025
74/02/08 11 45 0.770 0.400 0.015 0.010 0.040
74/02/2? 11 45 0.400 1.900 0.130 0.027
74/03/08 11 50 0.480 0.500 0.050 0.010 0.035
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/09/09
‘.707C1
36 23 22.0 083 07 07.0 4
UNNAMED CREEK
47 HAWKINS Co MAP
T/Cr1E 0KEE RES 040292
UND’ Y R I) BRDG .5 MI NW OF US HWY 11W
1 IFPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L NG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 1? 30 0.082 0.150 0.005K 0.005K 0.015
73/05/16 13 00 0.189 0.150 0.010 0.013 0.030
73/06/20 11 30 0.?73 2.800 0.091 0.031 0.050
73/07/23 12 00 0.189 0.220 0.023 0.026 0.065
73/08/2’. 11 40 0.075 0.690 0.190 0.030 0.050
73/09/21 11 70 0.092 0.290 0.021 0.044 0.063
73/10/1 11 25 3.010K 0.350 0.016 0.048 0.075
73/11/21 11 50 0.520 5.500 0.060 0.208
73/12/19 12 no 0.540 1.250 0.100 0.028 0.u3
74/01/18 12 30 0.520 0.300 0.016 0.020 0.042
74/02/O 3 11 30 0.520 0.400 (‘.025 0.015 0.045
74/02/2? 11 30 0.560 0.600 0.045 j.035 0.140
71, 103/08 11 30 0.350 1.100 0.025 0.025 0.070
K VMLUE KNOWN TO bE
LESS 1H N INUICI4TED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470701
36 23 30.0 083 13 00.0 4
POOR VALLEY CREEK
47 7.5 RUSSELVILLE
1/CHEROKEE RES 040192
HWY 31 BRDG 4 MI N MOORESBURG
I1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH F’4O2 NO3 TOT KJEL NI-f3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
73/05/16 12 15 0.076 0.210 0.009 0.006 0.010
73/06/20 11 15 0.210 2.730 0.126 0.017 0.045
73/07/23 11 45 0.330 1.900 3.126
73/08/24 11 15 0.054 1.000 0.095 0.008 0.020
73/ 9/21 11 00 0.126 0.365 0.031 0.009 0.030
73/10/18 11 05 0.017 0.450 0.038 0.011 0.011
73/11/21 11 26 0.036 0.400 0.044 0.008 0.020
73/12/19 11 30 0.270 2.200 0.420 0.016 0.020
74/01/18 12 05 0.208 0.100K 0.008 0.005K 0.010
74/02/OH 11 15 3.192 0.300 0.030 0.005K 0.005
74/0?/22 11 15 0.184 0.700 0.045 0.020
74/03/08 11 10 0.104 0.200 0.015 0.010 0.030
K VALUE I NUWN TO BE
LESS THs N INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/09/09
.70 7E 1
36 1’. 46.0 083 17 32.0 4
TURKEY CREEK
47 7.5 MOkRISTOWN
T/Cr1E OtcEE RES 040292
t DG JUST N MUORESTOWN 1000 F UPSTREAM
1IEPALES 2111204
0900 FEET DEPTi-i CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00655
DATE TIME DEPTr N02&N03 TOT KJEL Nr13-N P1-105 015 PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 11 05 2.000 0.240 0.009 0.046 0.075
73/05/16 11 jR 1.920 0.730 0.037 0.060 0.105
73/06/20 10 35 1.740 2.100 0.072 0.100 0.120
73/07/23 11 04 1.700 0.750 0.330 0.231 0.315
73/08/24 10 35 1.300 0.880 0.065 0.138 0.240
73/09/2! 10 15 1.140 0.840 0.255 0.290 0.390
73/10/1 i 10 30 0.910 0.300 0.010 0.210 0.330
73/11/2! 10 45 0.0 10K 0.012 0.005K
73/12/19 11 00 1.760 0.500 0.036 0.088 0.135
-74/01/18 11 30 2.100 0.900 0.108 0.095 0.d40
74/02/0 10 30 2.200 0.800 0.045 0.280
74/02/2? 10 35 1.180 1.500 0.080 0.075 0.300
74/03/08 10 30 1.800 0.600 0.015 0.100 0.185
K VALUE i NOWN TO
LE iS THAN IC DIC TEU
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7o/09109
4707F1
36 15 09.0 083 16 29.0 4
SPRING CREEK
47 7.5 BEAN STATION
T/C iEROKEE ES 040292
BRDG UPSTREAM OF MOUTH OF SPRING CREEK
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L P46/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 11 3? 1.440 0.370 0.006 0.020
73/05/16 11 50 1.700 1.470 0.065 0.033 0.045
73/06/20 10 45 1.800 2.200 0.220 0.360 0.400
73/07/23 11 15 1.860 0.660 0.063 0.154 0.190
73/08/24 10 45 1.560 0.880 0.231 0.024 0.030
73/09/21 10 30 1,600 0.180 0.028 0.022 0.030
73/10/18 10 40 1,460 0.100K 0.022 0.014 0.014
73/11/21 11 00 0.670 6.900
73/12/19 11 03 1.840 0.100 0.048 0.024 0.035
74/01/18 11 35 2.000 0.100 0.005K 0.016 0.035
74/02/18 10 45 1.760 0.400 0.020 0.015 0.040
74/02/22 10 45 1.100 1.500 0.030 0.030
74/03/08 10 40 1.500 2.100 0.050 0.015 0.035
K VALUE KNO’4N TO BE
LESS TH . N INDICATEO
-------
STO ET ETR1EVAL DATE Th/09/09
4707 1 ,1
36 21 30.0 083 02 10.0 4
ROBE . TSON CREEK
47 HAWKINS Co MAP
T/CPIEROKEE RES 040292
BI DG ON S SIDE OF LK 1.5 MI WSW HWY 66
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066 5
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTI-lO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L M(,/L PIG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 14 45 0.760 0.170 0.005K 0.005K 0.015
73/05/16 1’. 45 1.020 0.720 0.025 0.009 0.015
73/05/20 14 25 1.380 0.440 0.054 0.012 0.03’.
73/07/23 13 25 1.440 0.950 0.480 0.021 0.040
73/08/24 12 10 1.200 0.260 C.050 0.012 0.023
73/09/21 11 55 1.120 0.250 0.020 0.013 0.020
73/10/18 12 00 0.950 0.300 0. 16 0.009 0.010
73/11/21 12 15 0.384 0.350 3.016 0.012 0.090
73/12/19 14 20 v.800 0.600 0.024 0.012 0.020
74/01/18 14 05 1.060 0.400 0.012 0.012 0.030
74/02/18 12 15 0.950 0.900 0.040 0.015 0.025
74/02/2? 12 15 0.312 1.600 0.050 0.035
74/03/08 12 15 0.690 1.100 0.025 0.020 0.050
K LUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS IH..N 1NDIC ED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
470 7r11
36 21 45.0 082 59 20.0 4
LOUDER8AK CREEK
47 r-IAWKINS Co MAP
T/CHEROKEE RES
SEC RD RDG JUST W
1 1 PALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
040392
OF MCCLOUD
2111204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTr
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
Pt-IOS—DI5
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
Mcj/L
Mtj/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
73/04/15
13
55
0.031
0,180
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
73/05/16
14
05
0.039
3.000
0.054
0.009
0.100
73/06/20
13
45
0.160
2.310
0.021
0.032
0.270
73/07/23
13
40
0.189
1.150
0.065
0.016
0.110
73/08/24
12
?5
0.093
1.260
0.130
0.024
0.045
73/09/21
12
05
0.132
0.520
0.037
0.014
0.045
73/10/LH
12
15
0.039
0.350
0.015
0.008
0.025
73/11/21
12
30
0.076
0.400
0.012
0.044
0.125
73/12/19
14
40
0.132
2.100
0.507
0.012
0.025
74/01/18
13
15
0.300
0.400
0.008
0.012
0.015
74/02/18
12
30
0.340
0.800
0.035
0.010
0.02S
74/02/22
12
30
0.208
1.100
0.040
0.035
74/03/08
12
30
0.116
1.000
0.030
0.015
0.032
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
47 07AA TF47O7AA P005124°
36 14 55.0 083 17 20.0 4
MORRISTOWN
47 7.5 MORRISTOWN
i/CHEROKEE LAKE 040292
TURKEY CREEK/HOLSTOP.1 RIVER
1 IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NHJ—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MOD
TO DAY FEET M&/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MC,/L P INST MOD MONTHLY
73/06/06 08 00
CP(T)— 0.210 24.000 3.620 3.660 6.700 1.850 1.760
73/08/06 22 00
73/07/12 Ui 00
CPU)— 0.050 29.000 5.300 6.400 9.200 1.900 1.800
73/07/12 22 00
73/08/09 07 00
CP(T)— 0.130 24.000 4.600 5.400 8.350 1.950 1.900
73/08/09 22 00
73/09/07 07 00
CP(T)— 0.046 28.000 7.200 7.600 10.000 1.770 1.700
73/09/07 22 00
73/10/02 07 00
CPU)— 0.250 14.000 8.000 6.400 8.900 2.950 2.300
73/10/02 22 00
73/11/06 07 00
CPU)— 0.390 27.000 8.400 6.600 9.450 2.600 1.800
73/11/0 ’ 22 00
73/12/03 07 00
CPU)— 0.580 27.000 4.100 4.500 9.400 3.300 2.600
73/12/03 21 00
74/01/IS 08 00
CP(T)— 2.080 12.000 2.320 4.400 5.000 ‘..500
74/01/IS 23 00
74/02/04 08 00
CPU)— 1.280 9.000 2.080 5.100 5.000 4.000
74/02/0’. 23 00
64/03/11 08 00
CPU)— 0.040 25.000 8.600 2.300 2.300
74/02/28 22 00
74/04/09 08 00
CPU)— 1.040 11.000 2.100 4.900 2.000 1.900
74/04/09 22 00
74/05/0’. 08 00
CPU)— 0.280 23.000 4.700 4.300 7.90Q 2.200 1.900
74/05/06 22 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4707AA TF47O7AA P005124*
36 14 55.0 083 17 20.0 4
MORRI STOWN
47 7.5 MORRISTOWN
T/CHEROKEE LAKE 040292
TURKEY CREEK/HOLSTON RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGI)
TO OAY FEET P4G/L P4G/L P46/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
74/06/19 08 00
CP(T)— 0.120 26,000 4.600 4.800 7.600 1.700 1.850
74/06/19 22 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4707XA NQ47O7 A P002140
36 38 10.0 082 34 55.0 4
GATE CITY
‘+7 7.5 GATE CITy
T/CHEROKEE RESERVOIR 040192
UNNAMED TRIH/BIG MOCCASIN CR/HOLSTON RIV
I1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2A.N03 TOT KJEL NM3-N PriOSOIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET MG/I MG/L HG/I MG/I P HG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
73/10/29 ii 00
CP(T)— 0.120 17.000 2.000 6.600 9.300 0.182 0.185
73/10/29 16 00
73/11/28 11 00
CPU)— 1.260 7.200 2.700 4.100 0.205 0.199
73/11/28 16 00
73/12/28 11 00
CPU)— 1.680 13.500 2.400 2.400 0.22’. 0.215
73/12/28 16 00
74/01/28 11 00
CP(T)— 2.160 10.000 4.100 7.200 0.340 0.301
74/01/28 16 00
74/02/27 11 00
CP(T)- 1.840 14.000 1.980 5.250 7.750 0. 16 0.241
74/02/27 16 00
74/03/27 11 00
CPU)— 1.040 14.500 1.800 5.000 7.100 0.221 0.247
74/03/27 IA 00
74/04/26 11 00
CP(T)— 0.960 17.000 2.650 7.300 9.200 0.194 0.244
74/04/26 16 00
74/05/28 11 00
CPU)— 4.080 21.000 3.700 6.800 9.900 0.232 0.271
74/05/28 16 00
74/06/26 11,00
CPU)— 0.440 20.000 5.400 7.200 9.450 0.184 0.206
74/06/26 16 00
74/()7/2 11 00
CPU)— 0.240 17.000 2.000 4.900 7.300 0.249 0.198
74/07/26 16 00
74/ J8/26 11 00
CP(T)— 0.460 19.000 4.700 8.800 13.000 0.180 0.202
74/08/26 16 00
74/09/27 1! 00
CP(T)— 0.200 23.000 6.600 7.400 9.450 0.179 0.194
74/09/27 16 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4707 A N 04707XA P002140
36 38 10.0 082 34 55.0 4
GATE CITY
47 7.5 GATE CITY
T/CHEROKEE RESERVOIR 040192
UNNAMED TRIB/BIG MOCCASIN CR/HOLSTON RIV
I1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw—MGD
TO DAY FEET P4G/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
74/10/28 10 00
CP(T)— 0.080 26.000 8.225 7.370 11.000L 0.177 0.189
74/10/2B 16 00
L ACIUAL VALUE I KNUWN TO d l.
k EAT .N THAN VALUE GIVEN
-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE Th/09/09
470721 TF47072 1 P007000
36 07 45.0 083 30 13.0 4
JEFFERSON CITY
47 7.5 JOPPA
0/CHEROKEE LAKE 100691
MOSSY CREEK EMBAYMENT OF CHEROKEE LAKE
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
50051
50053
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PHOS—OIS
PHOS—TOT
FLOW
CONDUIT
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
RATE
FLOW—MOD
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/I
MG/L P
MG/L P
INST MOO
MONTHLY
73/05/31
08
00
CP(T)—
0.496
10.500
0.251
5.880
7.700
0.664
0.400
73/06/01
08
00
73/06/29
08
00
CP(T)—
0.155
12.600
1.260
11.000
11.500
0.380
0.400
73/06/29
15
00
73/07/27
08
00
CPU)—
0.400
8.900
0.140
7.900
10.500
0.450
0.460
73/07/27
16
00
73/08/31
13
00
10.500
14.000
0.600
0.500
73/10/01
11
00
0.860
16.500
0.100
1.950
10.500
0.600
0.500
73/11/01
13
00
0.600
15.000
2.300
7.800
14.500
0.500
0.500
73/12/01
13
00
0.120
16.000
3.570
7.800
9.200
0.600
0.600
73/12/31
13
00
1.240
9.900
0.170
4.600
6.500
0.600
0.600
74 1 ) 1/31
13
00
0.820
9.900
1.160
4.000
6.200
0.600
0.700
74/32/28
13
00
0.200
13.000
1.750
6.100
7.500
0.600
0.600
74/33/31
13
00
1.160
5.250
0.100
3.400
5.100
0.800
0.600
74/04/30
13
00
0.560
10.000
1.350
8.300
9.600
0.600
0.600
74/05/31
13
00
2.000
6.300
0.058
6.800
8.000
0.700
0.600
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY LIES IN 1974
STATE OF TENNESSEE
-------
LAcC t AT 0 ‘ L ¼ E ’ I c1’-(•5
LA F “EtiL D00 ‘ EAT I D-
CODE Lj . cE PIAME IUI L r P’,L,-’j ME, N EC C-IL)-.A “1. I 5 U Ir,U ‘-
‘701 LA’
-------
PERCtNT uF LAKES WITH HIOH R VALJ S N M E OF LAKES WITH r1IChE’ V’LULSi
MEDIAN MEDIAN
TOTAL P INO G N
500—
MEAN SEC
ME AN
15—
MEDIAN
INOEX
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
CHLOF A
MIN
00
0155 O THO b
4701
LAKE BARKLEY
13 C 2)
40 (
6)
13 C 2)
C
1)
73 1 11)
13 ( 2)
159
4704
BOONE RESERVOIR
40 6)
0 C
0)
73 C 11)
20 I
3)
47 1 7)
20 1 i)
200
‘.706
CHEATHAM RESERVOIR
7 C 1)
47 1
7)
7 C 1)
40 1
6)
90 C 13)
0 0)
191
4707
CHEROKEE LAKE
50 ( 7)
7 C 1)
53 C 8)
13 I
2)
13 C 0)
40 1 6)
176
4708
CHICKAMAUGA LAKE
67 ( 10)
63 ( 9)
33 1 5)
93 C
14)
90 C 13)
70 ( 10)
416
4711
DOUGLAS LAKE
73 C 11)
63 ( 9)
67 ( 10)
80 I
12)
13 C 0)
60 1 9)
356
4112
FORT LOUDON RESERVOIR
33 1 5)
20 1 3)
27 C 4)
73 1
11)
60 C 9)
27 1 4)
240
4713
GREAT FALLS LAKE
87 I 13)
73 C 11)
60 C 9)
87 C
13)
40 C 6)
93 I 14)
440
4717
NICKAJACK RESERVOIR
SO C 7)
33 ( 5)
47 1 7)
100 C
15)
80 ( 12)
33 I 5)
343
4720
OLD HICKORY LAKE
20 C 3)
80 ( 12)
20 1 3)
33 C
5)
100 C 15)
53 C 8)
306
4722
WATTS BAR RESERVOIR
60 C 9)
27 C 4)
40 C 6)
67 C
10)
67 C 10)
70 1 10)
331
4723
J. PERCY PRIEST RES€RVOI
27 ( 4)
100 C 15)
80 1 12)
27 1
4)
13 C 0)
47 C 7)
294
4724
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
80 C 12)
53 C 8)
100 C 15)
60 C
9)
33
I 5)
80 1 12)
406
4725
SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE
100 ( 15)
13 C 2)
93
I 14)
47 I
7)
13
C 0)
87
1 13)
353
4727
REELFOOT LAKE
0 ( 0)
93 C 14)
0
C 0)
0 C
0)
53
1 8)
7 1 1)
153
4728 WOODS RESERVOIR
93 ( 14) 87 C 13) 87 1 13) 53 1 8) 13 C 0) 100 1 15)
433
------- |