U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
DOUGU\SLAKE
SEVIER, JEFFERSON, AND CXKE COUNTIES
EPA REGION IV
VIoRKiNG PAPER No, W
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
ifG.f.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
DOUGLAS LAKE
SEVIER, JEFERSON, AND COCKE COUNTIES
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, W
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
AND THE
TENNESSEE NATIONAL GUARD
SEPTEMBER 1976
-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword
List of Study Lakes - Tennessee iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 13
V. Literature Revie d 20
VI. Appendices 21
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to Investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[ 3O3(c)], clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[ lO6 and §305(b)) activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by
lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and to augment plans implementation by the
states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. [ nvironmental Protection
Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Tennessee Department
of Public Health for professional involvement, to the Tennessee
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase
of the Survey, and to those Tennessee wastewater treatment
plant operators who provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Quality Control, Tennessee
Department of Public Health; the Division of Environmental
Planning, Tennessee Valley Authority; and the Nashville District
Corps of Engineers provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General William C. Smith, former Adjutant General
of Tennessee, and Project Officer Colonel Wilburn C. Johnson,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Tennessee National
Guardsnen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
LAKE NAME
Barki ey
Boone
Cheatham
Cherokee
Chi ckamauga
Dougi as
Fort Loudon
Great Falls
Nickajack
Old Hickory
Percy Priest
Reelfoot
South Holston
urns Ford
Watts Bar
COUNTY
Stewart, Montgomery
(Trigg, Lyon in KY)
Washington, Sullivan,
Carter
Cheatham, Davidson
Jefferson, Hamblen,
Grainger, Hawkins
Hamilton, Rhea, Meigs,
McMinn
Sevier, Jefferson, Cocke
Loudon, Knox, Blount
White, Van Buren
Marion, Hamilton
Sumner, Davidson, Wilson,
Smith, Trousdale
Davidson, Rutherford
Obion
Sullivan (Washington in
VA)
Moore, Franklin
Rhea, Meigs, Cumberland,
Roane, Loudon
Franklin, Coffee
Woods (Elk River)
-------
DOUGLAS
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
I , I?
SevierviIIe
L I
Map Location
-------
REPORT ON DOUGLAS LAKE, TENNESSEE
STORET NO. 4711
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Douglas Lake is considered early eutrophic based
upon field observations and analysis of Survey data. The
lake water was green and turbid with low Secchi disc
transparency. Chlorophyll a values ranged from 1.1 pg/i
to 8.6 pg/i, with a mean of 4.6 pg/l, and dissolved oxy-
gen concentrations were severely depressed with depth
during the summer sampling period. Of the 16 Tennessee
lakes sampled in 1973, 11 had greater median total phos-
phorus, 9 had greater median inorganic nitrogen, and 9
had greater median orthophosphorus than Douglas Lake.
A small amount of higher aquatic plants was reported
by Survey limnologists during the field investigation.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Douglas Lake was
limited by available phosphorus. Spikes with phosphorus
or phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously resulted in in-
creased assay yields. The addition of nitrogen alone did
not stimulate a growth response. Lake data concerning the
*See Appendix E.
-------
2
ratios of total available inorganic nitrogen to ortho-
phosphorus further substantiate these results.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from point
sources was estimated to be approximately 1.8% of the
total load reaching Douglas Lake. The city of New-
port contributed a total of 1.4% of the total annual
phosphorus load.
The calculated phosphorus loading of 5.55 g P/rn 2 !
yr is about four times that proposed by Vollenweider
(1975) as “eutrophic” for a lake with such volume and
retention time. Included in this loading are a number
of industrial point sources, many of probable nutrient
significance, which discharge to the French Broad River,
Nolichucky River, and to Pigeon River (see page 15).
No information is available on the nutrient contribu-
tions of these sources; however, the loads are included
in those measured at Stations A-2, C-i, and E—l, res-
pectively. There are also numerous unmeasured munici-
pal and domestic plants upstream of Douglas Lake which
discharge to the Nolichucky and French Broad Rivers
(Tennessee Department of Public Health, 1975); loadings
from these plants were not included due to their dis-
tance from the reservoir.
-------
3
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load not attributable
to nearby or sampled point sources was about 98.2% of
the total reaching the lake. This phosphorus input is
mainly from three major river systems, the French Broad
River, Nolichucky River, and Pigeon River which contri-
bute respectively 43.3%, 26.1%, and 27.0% of the total
phosphorus load.
Loadings from these rivers are largely attributable
to municipal and industrial discharges not sampled by
the National Eutrophication Survey. The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) in 1973 stated that of the seven major
tributary basins in the valley, the French Broad was one
of the most seriously polluted in terms of total affected
kilometers, having 320 km of streams degraded by pollution.
The Nolichucky River receives discharge of tailings from
mica washing operations upstream from Douglas Reservoir
(Byre, 1970) as well as discharges from the American Enka
Corporation, which accounts for 85.7% of the industrial
wastewater discharge to the French Broad River Basin
(Tennessee Department of Public Health, 1975). The Pigeon
River is greatly affected by industrial discharges from
the city of Newport.
-------
4
The phosphorus export rates of the unim-
pacted tributaries to Douglas Lake are similar to
those found in nearby Cherokee Lake (NES Working
Paper No. 445).
-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometry data and hydraulic retention time were pro-
vided by the Tennessee Valley Authority; tributary flow data
were provided by the Tennessee District Office of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) (outlet drainage area includes the lake
surface area). Tributary drainage area plus the lake surface
area do not equal the outlet drainage area probably because of
differences in the pool elevations used by the different sources
in their calculations. Precipitation values are estimated by
methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES)
Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is
included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 123.03 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 14.1 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 38.7 me ers.
4. Volume: 1,819.412 x 10 m 3 .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 108 days.
-------
6
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km 2 I ( m 3 /sec )
A(2) French Broad River 4,812.2 81.43
B(l) Long Creek 92.2 0.89
C(l) Nolichucky River 4,548.0 64.61
D(l) Clay Creek 46.4 0.85
E(l) Pigeon River 1,784.5 36.72
G(l) Clear Creek 26.9 0.50
H(1) Flat Creek 74.1 1.36
J(l) Leadvale Creek 6.7 0.07
K(1) Unnamed Creek 4.2 0.04
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 251.2 5.20
Total 11,646.4 191.67
2. Outlet — A(1) French 11,766.4 182.27
Broad River
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 154.5 cm.
2. Mean annual: 116.2 cm.
-------
7
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Douglas Lake was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical
parameters were collected from five or six stations on the
lake and from a number of depths at each station (see map,
pagev ). During each visit, depth-integrated samples were
collected from each station for chlorophyll a analysis and
phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the
first visit, two 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were
composited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were
8.8 meters at Station 1, 16.5 meters at Station 2, 28.4 meters
at Station 3, 22.9 meters at Station 4, 29.0 meters at
Station 5, and 35.1 meters at Station 6. For a more detailed
explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in
Appendix C and are summarized in Ill-A for waters at the surface
and at the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phyto-
plankton counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included
in 111-B. Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented
in Ill-C.
-------
N = NO. OF SAMPLES
00 MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
5/25/73
8/23/73
S° = 6 DEPTH
10/27/73
OODGLA RESERVOIR
TORET CODE 4711
PHYSICAL
AND CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER N°
S’°’
RANGE
0
MEDIAN
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
N 0
RANGE
MEDIAN
MAX
RANGE
(METERS)
N
SQ **
RANGE
= S
MEDIAN
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
TEMPERA1U E DEG CENT)
0.-1.5 M DEPTh 12
MAX DEPTH 0 • 6
20.1— 72.0
12.7- 70.1
36.1
13.3
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
30.0— 76.0
37.1— 24.6
62.5
23.0
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
19.0— 54.0
16.4— 20.5
28.6
18.2
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
DISSOLVED OXfGEN (MG/L)
0.—l.5 N L)EPTH
MAX DEPTH 00 0
8.2— 9.4
4.6— 7.4
9.0
6.3
1.2— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
5
6
6.2— 7.8
0.0— 6.0
6.6
0.1
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
5
5
4.8— 8.8
3.6— 6.0
6.2
3.8
1.5— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
CONDUCTIVITY (UMMOS)
0.-1.5 H DEPTH 1
MAX JEPTH** 6
140.— 160.
143.- 175.
150.
150.
0.0— 1.2
8.8- ?9.0
6
6
155.— 119.
155.— 224.
166.
181.
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
177.— 195.
175.— 308.
182.
215.
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
Pr) (STANDARD UNITS)
0.—1.5 4 DEPTH 12
MAX DEPTH 4 6
7.7— 8.4
7.4- 7.6
7.8
7.4
0.0— 1.2
8.8- 29.0
6
6
7.5— 8.6
6.8— 7.1
8.1
6.9
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
7.1— 8.1
6.9— 7.4
7.4
7.0
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
TOTAL AL )SALINITY (MD/L)
0.- I.5 H DEPTH 12
MAX D PTH* 0 6
3M.- 56.
42.- 58.
46.
48.
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
43.— 49.
35.— 60.
45.
54.
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
42.— 48.
44.— 50.
45.
46.
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.—1.5 H DEPTo 12
MAX UEPTH’ ° 6
0.0 19—0.057
0.033-0.074
0.023
0.043
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
0.010—0.048
0.033—0.240
0.014
0.076
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
0.018—0.044
0.0430.125
0.023
0.090
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
DISSOLVLD ORTPIO P (MO/L)
0.-1.S H DEPTH 12
MAX DEPTH°° o
0.003—0.035
0.019—0.041
0.008
0.027
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
0.004—0.017
0.005—0.083
0.006
0.011
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
0.011—0.016
0.014—0.030
0.014
0.020
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
N02 .NU3 (MG/LI
0.—1. 4 DEPTh 12
MAX DEPTH°° 6
0.340—0.550
0.380-0.700
0.365
0.465
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
0.100—0.240
0.060—0.560
0.130
0.150
0.0— 0.0
7.9 35.1
10
5
0.230—0.32G
0.I500.430
0.245
0.330
0.0— 1.5
1.0 23.8
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.—I.5 N DEPTH 12
¼1M JEPTH°• 6
0.030—0.160
0.O70— .?90
0.040
0.080
0.0— 1.2
8.8— 29.0
6
6
0.060—0.090
0.130—1.710
0.060
0.500
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
0.040—0.050
0.110—0.240
0.045
0.220
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
KJELJAHL N (MG/L)
Q.-1.5 H DE°Th 12
MAX DEPTH ° 6
0.200-0.700
0.200—0.600
0.400
0.350
0.0— I.2
8.8— 29.0
8
6
0.300—0.500
0.300—2.300
0.450
0.850
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 35.1
10
5
0.200—0.500
0.4000.800
0.350
0.500
0.0— 1.5
7.0— 23.8
ECCHI DISC (METERS)
0
00*4*
0
00040
0
0*000
-------
9
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Al gal
Sampling Dominant Units
Date Genera per ml
05/25/73 1. Flagellates 708
2. Melosira 94
3. Stephanodiscus 94
4. Asterionella 73
5. Nitzschia 62
Other genera . 217
Total 1 ,248
08/23/73 1. Nitzschia 4,913
2. Flagellates 648
3. Oscillatoria 342
4. Synedra 342
5. Scenedesmus 180
Other genera 306
Total 6,731
10/27/73 1. Flagellates 724
2. lielosira 559
3. Nitzschia 428
4. Stephanodiscus 164
5. Trachelomonas 132
Other genera 396
Total 2,403
-------
10
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number ( iig/l )
05/25/73 1 8.3
2 1.8
3 2.4
4 3.7
5 2.7
6 4.2
08/23/73 1 8.6
2 5.5
3 4.2
4 5.8
5 5.2
6 7.0
10/27/73 1
2 5.8
3 6.0
4 3.4
5 1.7
6 1.1
-------
ii
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike(mg/i )
Ortho P
Conc. (mg/i )
Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i )
Maximum Yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
Stations
1, 2, 3
Control
0.05 p
0.05 p +
1.00 N
1.0
N
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.020
0.474
0.474
1.474
1.474
4.2
9.9
12.2
3.6
Stations
4,
5, 6
Control
0.05 P
0.05 p +
1.00 N
1.0
N
0.012
0.062
0.062
0.012
0.546
0.546
1.546
1.546
0.2
11.1
16.8
0.2
-------
12
2. Discussion —
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum
capricornutum , indicate that the potential for primary
productivity in Douglas Lake was high at Stations 1 , 2,
and 3, and low at Stations 4, 5, and 6 at the time of
sampling, probably due to the proximity of Stations 1
through 3 to the municipal waste sources impacting
Douglas Lake. The increased growth of the test alga
in response to the addition of orthophosphOruS, as
well as the lack of response to the addition of nitro-
gen, indicates phosphorus limitation. Maximum yield
was achieved with the simultaneous addition of both
phosphorus and nitrogen.
The ratios of the mean total available inorganic
nitrogen to orthophosphorus for the spring, summer,
and fall samplings were respectively 31/1, 43/1 , and
24/1, further indicating phosphorus limitation.
-------
13
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Tennessee
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff month of February when two samples were
collected. Sampling was begun in April 1973 and was completed
in March 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a “normalized” or average year were pro-
vided by the Tennessee District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries, ex-
cept Leadvale Creek and Unnamed Creek, Stations J(1) and K(l),
were determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program
for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for
tributaries are those measured minus known point source loads, if
any.
Nutrient loadings for Leadvale Creek, Unnamed Creek, and un-
sampled “minor tributaries and immediate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS)
were estimated by using the mean annual nutrient loads, in kg!
km 2 /yr, for Long Creek, Clay Creek, and Flat Creek at Stations B(1),
D(1), and H(1), and multiplying the mean by the appropriate
drainage area in km 2 .
-------
14
The operator of the White Pine wastewater treatment plant
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
Municipal nutrient loads for the Dandridge, Ramada Inn, Newport
and Jefferson County Nursing Home wastewater treatment plants
were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr. Nutrient
loads for the five included elementary and high schools and r ere
estimated at 0.567 kg P and 1.701 kg N/capita/yr (covers 180 days).
-------
15
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal :*
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment ( m 3 /d x 103) Water
White Pine 1,270 Extended 0 661 Leadville Creek
aeration
Dandridge 250 Contact 0.095Th Unnamed Creek!
stabilization French Broad
River
Newporttt 7,000 Trickling 2.650 Pigeon River
filter
Jefferson County 90 Tertiary 0 034Th Tributary to
Nursing Home French Broad
River
Cosby High School 415 Extended 0.157Th Cosby Creek!
aeration Pigeon River
Edgemont Elementary 765 Tertiary 0 290Th Sinking Creek
School
Parrotsville School 994 Extended 0 376Th Clear Creek
aeration
Centerview Elementary 331 Extended 0.1251- Slate Creek
School aeration
Ramada Inn (Newport) 290 Tertiary 0.110Th Bell Creek!
Douglas Lake
McDonald Elementary 486 Extended 0 184Th War Branch!
School aeration lick Creek
2. Known industrlal:**
At least 10 industries discharge to the immediate Douglas Reservoir
drainage basin, many of which are of probable nutrient significance. American
Enka Corporation, which accounts for most of the industrial wastewater dis-
charge to the French Broad River basin, impacts Flat Creek. A. G Lawrence
Leather Company, Stokely VanCanip Incorporated, American Limestone Division,
Newport Industrial Products, Sonoco Products Company, and Newline Corporation
impact Pigeon Creek. Arapahoe Corporation. Haywood-Wakefield Company, and
Vernco, Incorporated impact Sinking Creek. In addition to these, there are a
number of industrial plants further upstream the Nolichucky River and its
tributaries Because data on the discharges are not available, these sources
are not listed on the following loading pages. however, their nutrient loads,
if any, are included in the respective tributary loads
*Treatment plant questionnaires, Tennessee Department of Public Health, 1975.
**Tennessee Department qf Public Health, 1975
tEstimated at 0.3785 m’/capita/day.
tt6O% of the total waste load contributed by canning industry
-------
16
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) —
A(2) French Broad River 295,245 43.3
B(l) Long Creek 780 0.1
C(l) Nolichucky River 178,200 26.1
0(1) Clay Creek 860 0.1
E(l) Pigeon River 184,090 27.0
G(l) Clear Creek. 2,820 0.4
H(l) Flat Creek 1,340 0.2
J(l) Leadvale Creek 100 <0.1
K(l) Unnamed Creek 65 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 3,770 0.6
c. Known municipal STP’s -
White Pine 2,515 0.4
Dandridge 285 <0.1
Newport 7,940 1.2
Jefferson County Nursing Home 100 <0.1
Cosby High School 235 <0.1
Edgemont Elementary School 435 0.1
Parrotsville Elementary and 565 0.1
High School
Centerview Elementary School 190 <0.1
Ramada Inn 330 <0.1
McDonald Elementary School 275 <0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 75 <0.1
e. Known industrial - See discussion,
page 15.
f. Direct precipitation** - 2,155 0.3
Totals 682,370 100.0
2. Output - A(l) French Broad River 286,690
3. Net annual P accumulation - 395,680
*Estjmate based on 252 lakeside residences, 2 parks, and 1 camp.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
17
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A(2) French Broad River 4,231,800 46.4
B(l) Long Creek 42,000 0.5
C(l) Nolichucky River 2,410,755 26.4
D(l) Clay Creek 26,410 0.3
E(l) Pigeon River 2,012,400 22.0
G(1) Clear Creek 26,720 0.3
H(1) Flat Creek 53,960 0.6
J(l) Leadvale Creek 3,915 <0.1
K(l) Unnamed Creek 2,455 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries and imediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 146,700 1 .6
c. Known municipal STPs -
White Pine 2,860 <0.1
Dandridge 850 <0.1
Newport 23,805 0.3
Jefferson County Nursing Home 305 <0.1
Cosby High School 705 <0.1
Edgemont Elementary School 1,300 <0.1
Parrotsville Elementary and 1 ,690 <0.1
High School
Centerview Elementary School 565 <0.1
Ramada Inn 985 <0.1
McDonald Elementary School 825 <0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 2,825 <0.1
e. Known industrial - See discussion,
page 15.
f. Direct preclpitation** - 132,825 1 .5
Totals 9,126,655 100.0
2. Output - A(l) French Broad River 7,702,060
3. Net annual N accumulation - 1,424,595
*Estimate based on 252 lakeside residences, 2 parks, and 1 camp.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
18
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km 2 /yr kg N/km 2 /yr
A(2) French Broad River 61 879
B(1) Long Creek 8 455
C(1) Nolichucky River 39 530
D(1) Clay Creek 19 569
E(1) Pigeon River* 103 1,128
G(1) Clear Creek* 105 993
H(1) Flat Creek 18 728
J(l) Leadvale Creek 15 584
K(l) Unnamed Creek 15 584
*Background levels for these tributaries are probably inflated
by unmeasured industrial point sources upstream.
-------
19
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider (1975).
Essentially, his “eutrophic” loading is that at which the receiv-
ing waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his “oil-
gotrophic” loading is that which would result in the receiving
water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morpho-
metry permitted. A “mesotrophic” loading would be considered
one between “eutrophic” and “oligotrophic”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration
is severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m 2 /yr)
Estimated loading for Douglas Lake 5.55
Vollenweider’s “eutrophic” loading 1.31
Vollenweider’s “oligotrophic” loading 0.66
-------
20
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Byre, Bruce A. 1970. Summary of Observed Nutrient Concentrations
and Nutrient Entrapment in TVA Reservoirs. In: TVA Activities
Related to Study and Control of Eutrophication in the Tennessee
Valley. National Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals,
Alabama. April 1970. pp. 34-51.
Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1975. t’Iater Quality
Management Plan for the French Broad River Basin. Division of
Water Quality Control, Nashville, Tennessee.
Tennessee Valley Authority. 1973. Water Quality in the Tennessee
Valley. Division of Environmental Planning, Water Quality Branch,
Paper #E-WQ-73-l. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophica-
tion Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. National
Environmental Research Center, [ as Vegas, Nevada, and Pacific
Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models with Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
COr’ VERS ION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FA(;TORS
Hectares x 2.471 acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 1O acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR TENNESSEE
09/ 13/76
LAKE CODE 4711
DOUGLAS LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S0 KM} 11766.4
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRI8UTARY MONTH YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY FLOW
4 73 237.295
5 73 305.822
6 73 317.149
7 73 192.555
8 73 301.631
9 73 232.764
In 73 159.707
II 73 119.497
I ? 73 240.976
1 74 557.842
7 74 368.11
3 74 221.438
4 73 178.96 ?
5 73 102.555
6 73 136.4R7
7 73 94.0 12
8 73 68.577
9 73 40.7 T h
10 73 34.547
II 73 76.455
12 73 135.638
1 7’. 247.489
2 74 197.935
3 74 133.089
14 73.057
15 217.473
19 308.654
2 . 305.057
23 713.584
20 198.218
17 166.788
20 113.267
18 317.149
17 707.921
7 461.564
7 209.262
14 138.469
15 124.594
H 111.285
24 109.303
23 48.705
20 15.683
17 23.560
2) 85.800
18 60.RH I
17 176.0MG
7 213.226
7 122.895
356. 792
0.0
SUB—DRAINAGE NORMALIZED
TR I8UTARY APEA(SU 1cM) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
FLOWS(CMS)
JUL AU& SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN
47 1 1A1
471 1A2
471181
471 1C1
471101
471 1E1
47 1 1G1
471 1H1
4711J1
47 11K 1
471 1ZZ
11766.4
4812.2
92.2
4548.0
46.4
1784.5
76.9
74.1
6.7
4.2
251.2
208.13
98.83
1.13
88.91
1.14
43.32
0.66
1.82
0.082
0.052
6.80
228.23
118.08
1.58
116.38
I.3
48.70
0.80
2.21
0.114
0.073
8.69
210.11
129.41
1.74
116.95
1.57
60.03
0.91
2.51
0.126
0.080
9.80
130.26
112.70
1.01
91.46
1.16
46.16
0.87
1.85
0.073
0.062
6.65
113.55
88.63
0.77
68.53
0.91
41.06
0.53
1.46
0.055
0.035
5.18
170.75 168.22
67.39 64.85
0.59 0.76
48.70 48.42
0.89 0.69
32.85 31.71
0.40 O. ’ .0
1.10 1.10
0.089 0.055
0.027 0.035
3.96 -..30
195.95 181.51
63.71 50.69
0.72 0.31
41.91 32.56
0.59 0.39
25.94 18.75
0.34 0.23
0.94 0.63
0.052 0.022
0.033 0.014
3.79 2.20
191.14 205.01
53.52 55.50
0.46 0.56
30.58 37.10
0.38 0.M7
17.58 17.41
0.22 0.27
0.60 0.74
0.033 0.040
0.021 0.025
2.43 2.97
189. ’.4
76.17
1.14
57.20
0.87
57.20
0.52
1.40
0.082
0.052
5.78
182.27
81.43
0.89
64.61
0.65
36.72
0.50
1.36
0.068
0.042
5.20
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
ORAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS =
11766.4
11646.5
TOTAL FLOW
TOTAL FLOW
IN = 2306.15
OUT = 2190.31
471 IA)
471 IA?
21
21
21 127.709
21 308.654
-------
T4I8UTARY FLOW 1NFOI MAT ION FOR TENNESSEE
09/1 3/76
LAKE CODE 4711
DOUGLAS LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWSCMS
4 73 3.171
5 73 2.823
6 73 1.99€.
7 73 1.161
8 13 1.337
9 73 0.411
10 73 0.371
11 73 0.983
12 73 1.320
1 74 3.681
2 74 2.832
3 74 2.520
4 73 142.717
5 73 139.885
6 73 94.861
7 73 51.537
8 73 50.687
9 73 33.980
10 73 44.741
11 73 61.731
1? 73 137.337
I 74 178.96?
2 74 171.600
3 74 157.725
4 73 1.603
5 73 1.419
6 73 1.002
7 73 0.583
8 73 0.671
9 73 0.354
10 73 0.268
11 73 0.583
12 73 1.260
I 74 2.534
2 74 2.04’
3 74 1.637
4 73 58.616
5 73 57.766
6 73 45.590
7 73 25.060
8 73 25.814?
9 73 14.95!
10 73 13.790
II 73 17.840
12 73 49.835
1 74 98.543
2 74 78.721
1 74 58.899
14 1.996
15 2.359
19 2.166
24 1.382
23 1.053
20 0.394
17 0.328
20 0.328
18 0.262
17 2.158
7 2.390
7 2.888
14 102.790
15 104.206
19 122.329
24 45.024
23 41.059
20 31.149
17 31.715
20 33.697
18 72.208
17 117.798
7 159.990
7 132.806
14 1.002
15 1.186
19 1.090
24 0.725
23 0.530
20 0.575
Ii 0.240
20 0.127
18 0.592
17 1.572
7 1.917
7 1.314
14 47.289
15 60.8141
19 49.554
?4 27.666
23 20.360
20 32.281
17 13.592
20 3.511
18 34.263
17 75.040
7 80.703
7 48.705
1.232
7.532
TRIHUTAPY MONTH YEA& MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY FLOW
47118!
471 ICI
471101
4711
21 1.371
21 20.162
21 127.709
2! 467.228
21
21
21 55.501
21 161.123
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFOWMATIOP l FOR TINNESSEE 09/13/76
LAKE CODE 4711 DOUGLAS LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRItiUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
471101 4 73 0.932 14 0.932
5 73 0.824 15 0.688
6 73 0.583 19 0.634
7 73 0.340 24 0.405
8 73 0.391 23 0.309
q 73 0.206 16 0.203
10 73 0.156 17 0.140
11 73 0.340 20 0.074
12 73 0.733 18 0.345
1 74 1.472 17 0.912
2 74 1.186 7 1.113 21 0.716
3 74 0.951 7 0.762 21 4.389
471 1 -11 4 73 2.560 14 1.603
5 73 2.268 15 1.894
6 73 2.735 19 1.741
7 73 0.934 24 1.110
8 73 1.076 23 0.847
9 73 0.566 16 0.558
10 73 0.428 17 0.385
11 73 0.932 20 0.202
12 73 2.064 18 0.949
1 74 4.049 17 2.512
2 74 3.256 7 3.058 21 1.968
3 7’. 2.61l 7 2.098 21 12.035
471 1J 1 4 73 0.230 14 0.14’.
5 73 0.204 15 0.170
6 73 0.144 19 0.157
7 73 0.084 24 0.100
8 73 0.110 23 0.115
9 73 0.051 16 0.050
10 73 0.03 17 0.035
11 73 O.OH’. 20 0.018
12 73 0.181 18 (1.085
I 74 0.365 17 0.226
2 74 0.294 7 0.275 21 0.177
3 74 0.235 7 0.189 21 1.082
47l1’c I 4 73 0.147 1’. 0.092
5 73 0.130 15 0.109
6 73 0.092 19 0.100
7 73 0.054 24 0.064
8 73 0.062 23 0.029
9 73 0.033 16 0.032
10 73 0.025 17 0.022
11 73 0.054 20 0.012
12 73 0.116 18 0.054
I 74 0.232 17 0.144
2 74 0.187 7 0.176 21 0.113
3 74 0.150 7 0.123 21 0.702
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR TENNESSEE 09/13/76
LA (E CODE 4711 OOUGLAS LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
471hZ 4 73 12.799
5 73 11.327
6 73 8.014
7 73 6.201
8 73 5.380
9 73 2.240
10 73 1.815
11 73 4.304
12 73 7.70?
1 74 17.500
2 74 13.847
3 74 11.61C
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
471101
36 04 36.0 083 15 05.0 3
DOUGLAS LAKE
47089 TENNESSEE
040391
I 1EPALES 2111202
0031 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00 ’ .00 00 ’ .10 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS—DIS
F 0M OF TEMP SECCPII FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT M6/L INCHES MICRONHO SU MG/I MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
73/05/25 10 15 0000 21.6 50 160 7.80 46 0.080 0.500 0.370 0.035
10 15 0004 21.5 8.2 160 7.70 46 0.070 0.300 0.360 0.017
10 15 0015 20.8 8.0 175 7.60 47 0.070 0.200 0.370 0.017
10 15 0029 20.1 7.4 175 7.60 47 0.070 0.300 0.380 0.019
73/08/23 11 15 0000 25.5 7.2 30 179 7.50 ‘ .3 0.090 0.500 0.240 0.017
11 15 0007 24.8 183
11 15 0015 2’..! 6.2 198 6.90 45 0.090 0.300 0.390 0.010
11 15 0026 23.3 6.0 224 7.00 35 0.130 0.300 0.560 0.020
03665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPI-4YL
FROM OF A
TO hAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/25 10 15 0000 0.054 8.3
10 15 0004 0.057
10 15 OO IS 0.043
10 15 0029 0.074
73/08/23 11 15 0000 0.048 8.6
11 15 0015 0.059
11 15 0026 0.060
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 16/09/10
471102
36 02 30.0 083 20 20.0 3
DOUGLAS RESERVOIR
47089 TENNESSEE
040391
1 1EPAL.ES
0056 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
73/05/25 10 45 0000
10 45 0004
10 45 0015
10 45 0030
10 45 0054
73/08/?3 10 35 0000
10 35 0015
10 35 0030
10 35 0050
73/10/27 10 10 0000
10 10 0005
10 10 0015
10 10 0023
0.023
0.019
0.022
0.029
0.047
0 .02u
0.021
0.023
0.083
0.044
0.040
fl .099
0.125
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TINE DEPTH
WATER
DO
TRANSP
CNOUCTVY
PH
1 AL
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
PHOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICPOMHO
SU
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
14G/L P
73/05/25
10 45 0000
21.2
55
150
7.90
48
0.040
0.200
0.340
0.008
10 45 0004
21.2
8.6
150
7.80
48
0.040
0.200
0.340
0.009
10 45 0015
20.4
8.2
150
7.70
52
0.050
0.200
0.370
0.011
10 45 0030
19.2
7.0
150
7.60
53
0.070
0.200
0.400
0.021
10 45 0054
15.6
6.6
150
7.40
58
0.270
0.400
0.410
0.035
73/08/23
10 35 0000
26.8
6.2
54
168
8.00
44
0.080
0.500
0.120
0.004
10 35 0015
26.7
6.0
168
7.30
41
0.080
0.300
0.110
0.004
10 35 0030
26.3
4.2
182
7.20
41
0.100
0.300
0.290
0.O0
10 35 0044
24.7
198
10 35 0050
24.6
1.1
200
6.90
38
0.220
0.500
0.490
0.014
73/10/27
10 (0 0000
19.0
5’.
195
8.10
46
0.050
0.500
0.250
0.015
10 10 0005
19.0
8.8
192
8.10
46
0.040
0.500
0.230
0.013
10 10 0015
16.9
6.6
297
7.30
50
0.180
0.700
0.400
0.023
10 10 0023
16.4
6.0
308
7.20
50
0.220
0.800
0.430
0.030
00665
32217
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
PHOS—TOT
CHLRPHYL
FROM
OF
A
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L P
UG/L
1.8
5.5
5.8
-------
5109 (1 RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
471103
36 00 50.0 043 24 45.0 3
L)OLJGLAS 1ESEPVOIW
47089 TENNESSEE
040392
1 IEPALES 2111202
0076 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TINE DEPTH 4TER 00 TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3—N 101 KJEL NO2 N03 P805—015
FROM OF TEMP SECCrII FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N NTOTAL URTHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICRONHO SU MC ./L HG/L P 10/1 P16/ I.. M6/L P
73/05/25 I) 05 0000 21.9 72 150 7.90 56 0.060 0.400 0.380 0.011
13 05 0004 21.6 9.0 150 1.80 38 0.030 0.400 0.350 0.014
13 05 0015 20.0 7.8 150 7.60 40 0.050 0.300 0.380 0.010
13 05 0035 17.8 6.4 150 7.50 40 0.110 0.300 0.420 0.020
13 05 0050 14.4 6.6 140 7.50 36 0.140 0.400 0.540 0.022
13 05 0093 13.0 ‘..6 150 1.40 42 0.290 0.600 0.460 0.041
731)8/23 10 00 0000 26.9 7.8 75 167 7.80 46 0.060 0.300 0.170 0.005
10 00 0015 26.9 167
10 00 0033 26.4 1.0 178 7.00 43 0.070 0.200K 0. ’ .bO 0.004
10 00 0046 ?5.2 180
10 00 0060 24.4 0.1 181 6.90 46 0.300 0.600 0.380 0.008
10 00 0079 ?2.8 0.1 188 6.80 60 0.850 1.300 0.080 0.008
73/10/27 09 41 0000 20.4 48 187 7.50 43 0.040 0.400 0.240 0.011
09 41 0005 20.4 6.6 182 7.40 43 0.050 0.300 0.230 0.0 11
09 1 0015 20.2 6.6 185 7.30 42 u.OSO 0.300 0.230 0.013
09 41 0030 19.2 6.0 201 7.2 43 0.110 0.400 0.260 0.013
09 41 0040 18.2 5.2 227 7.00 47 0.170 0.500 0.320 0.018
09 41 0049 17.3 3.8 251 6.90 50 0.240 0.700 0.370 0.021
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH D, 10s ’ror CHLPPP4YL
FROM OF A
10 iJAY FEET HG/L P (J&/L
73/05/25 13 05 0000 0.026 2.’.
I) 05 0004 0.026
13 05 0015 0.023
13 05 0035 0.0..0
I) 05 0050 0.036
13 05 0093 0.062
73/08/23 10 00 0000 0.Olb
10 00 0033 (.015
10 00 0060 0.052
10 00 0079 0.091
73/13/27 09 41 0000 0.023 6.0
1J9 41 000 0.021
0 # 61 0015 0.021
09 41 0030 . .041
09 41 0040 0.071
09 41 0049 0.111
K V LIJE 1nJ TO BE
LtSS T it.’i IU1)IC. .TEU
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
DATE TIME DEPTh
FROM OF
TO DA ’ FEET MG/I P
73/05/25 13 45 0000
13 45 0004
13 45 0015
13 45 0030
13 45 0050
13 45 0075
73/08/23 09 ‘5 0000
09 25 0030
09 75 3046
09 25 0062
73/10/27 09 14 0000
09 14 0005
09 14 0015
09 14 0030
09 14 (,040
0.029
0.022
0.024
0.020
0.033
0.040
0.013
0.011
0.018
0.0 33
0.027
0.023
0.019
0.022
0.04 3
471104
35 57 00.0 083 24 45.0 3
DOUGLAS RESERVOIR
47089 TENNESSEE
040391
1 IEPALLS 2111202
0076 FEET DEh T.1 CLASS 00
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TINE
DEPTh
WATER
00
TRANSP
CNDUCTVY
Ph
T ALPc
NH3—N
TOT KJEL
N026N03
PrIOS—DIS
FROM
OF
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
PlG/L
INCHES
MICRONHO
SI)
MG/L
HG/L
MG/I
MG/L
MG/L P
73/05/25
13 45 0000
22.8
72
150
8.20
42
0.040
0.600
0.350
0.024
II 45 0004
22.2
9.4
150
8.40
42
0.040
0.400
0.360
0.004
13 45 0015
20.4
8.6
150
7.90
41
0.030
0.400
0.370
0.007
13 45 0030
17.6
6.6
150
7.70
40
0.040
0.300
0.540
0.014
13 45 0050
15.’.
6.6
145
7.50
41
0.060
0.300
0.580
0.020
13 45 0075
13.6
6.0
150
7.50
44
0.080
0.400
0.620
0.022
73/08/23
09 75 0000
27.1
6.6
60
164
8.20
47
0.060
0.400
0.100
0.007
09 25 0015
27.1
162
09 25 0030
26.7
1.8
176
7.30
46
0.090
0.200
0.340
0.005
09 25 0046
25.3
0.1
176
6.90
45
0.080
0.300
0.440
0.005
09 25 0052
75.1
176
09 25 0062
24.2
0.1
155
6.90
52
0.250
0.400
0.2 0
0.005
73/I0/?7
09 I’. 0000
21.0
48
177
7.30
46
0.050
0.400
0.240
0.014
09 16 0005
21.0
6.2
177
7.30
44
0.040
0.300
0.240
0.014
09 14 0015
21.0
6.4
175
7.30
44
0.040
0.300
0.240
0.012
09 14 0030
20.9
6.6
175
7.40
44
0.050
0.300
0.230
0.014
09 14 0040
20.5
6.0
175
7.40
46
0.110
0.400
0.150
0.014
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPI-IYL
A
UG/L
3.7
5.8
3.4
-------
STORET . ETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/10
00665
TIME DEPTH PMOSTOI
OF
DAY FEET MG/L P
14 25 0000
14 25 0004
14 25 0015
14 75 0025
14 25 0040
14 25 C065
14 75 0092
73/08/2 ’ 16 20 0000
IS 20 0030
16 20 0045
IS ?0 0070
lb 20 0095
73/10/27 06 45 0000
04 45 0005
08 45 0015
08 45 0030
DR ‘5 0050
013 ..5 0065
A YALUI ,cPlOwN It) UE
LLSS 1,169 IUOIC2TE0
411105
35 58 33.0 083 27 iS.O 3
DOUGLAS RESERVOIR
47089 TENNESSEE
040391
IIEPALES 2111202
0095 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00077
I R A#SP
SECCH I
INCHES
004l
T ALIt
C ACO 3
MG/L
00010
DATE TIME DE Tr’ iATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT
73/05/25 I’ 25 0000 21.9
I’. 25 0004 21.4
I’ 25 0015 19.6
14 ‘5 0025 18.4
14 75 0040 16.1
14 ?5 0065 14.4
14 25 0092 12.p
73/08/2? lb 20 0000 P7.’.
lb 20 0015 27.2
16 70 0030 27.1
lb 70 0045 25.5
lb 70 0070 2..0
IS 70 0080 23.2
16 20 0095 21.5
73/10/27 08 45 0000 2I.0
08 65 0005 21.0
08 ‘.5 0015 21.0
08 45 0030 20.9
08 45 0050 19.2
88 45 0065 18.2
00610
NH3-N
TOT AL
00625
TOT KJEL
N
ROlL
00630
NO2&N03
N—TOTAL
R O/L
00094
CN DO C T VT
FIELD
II IC4OMIIO
70 145
140
150
ISO
ISO
150
150
65 161
163
163
l82
1 69
I 68
lAb
49 177
177
179
178
201
215
00400
PH
SO
8.00
8.00
7.60
7 • 50
7.50
7.40
7.40
8.60
7 • 60
7.00
6.90
6 • 90
7.40
7 • so
7.40
7.30
7.10
7.00
42
0.040
0.700
0.400
42
0.030
0.400
0.380
42
0.050
0.2004
0.400
46
0.080
0.2008
0.460
52
0.060
0.2008
0.530
44
0.070
0.2004
0.610
48
0.080
0.300
0.410
44
0.060
0.300
0.110
00b1l
PHO S-DIS
OR I HO
ROIL P
0.001
0.006
0.009
0.020
0.020
0.0 22
0.026
0.008
00300
DO
MG IL
9.0
8.0
6.8
6.13
6.6
6.0
5.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
6.0
5.8
6.0
‘.8
3.8
32217
C It. PP I I IL
A
tJ/ L
2.7
5.2
1.1
43 0.060 0.200 0.140 0.008
42 0.150 0.300 0.550 0.010
43 0.190 0.500 0.450 0.017
DATE
FROM
TO
7 3/05/25
55 0.750
48 0.050
46 0.040
47 0.040
‘.6 0.050
45 4.160
44 0.230
I • 200
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.2004
0.400
0.50 0
0.060
0. 290
0.2 80
0.270
0 • 260
0.290
0.330
0.009
0.0 14
0.012
0.0 19
0.0 14
0.0 18
0.020
.023
0.022
C .022
0.02 7
0.031
0.034
O • 036
0.014
0.0 16
0.023
O .0.6
.,.070
0.0 19
0.0113
C .020
t.. OId
0.046
0.090
-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/09/10
471106
35 57 47.0 083 31 57.0 3
DOUGLAS RESERVOiR
47155 TENNESSEE
040391
I IEPALES 2111202
0100 FEEl DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH 1 ALK NH3N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PNOSDIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCHI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORIHO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICWOMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
13/05/25 15 50 0000 21.6 59 150 7.80 47 0.160 0.500 0.550 0.007
15 50 0004 20.1 9.0 145 7.80 49 0.040 0.300 0.420 0.003
IS 50 0015 19.7 8.8 145 7.80 54 0.050 0.200 0.450 0.010
15 50 0025 18.2 7.4 145 7.63 53 0.050 0.200 0.450 0.007
15 50 0040 16.3 7.4 150 7.50 50 0.070 0.200 0.500 0.013
15 50 0065 14.3 7.4 140 1.50 48 0.060 0.200 0.690 0.024
15 50 009 12.7 6.8 140 7.40 51 0.070 0.200 0.700 0.028
73/08/22 15 30 0000 27.3 6.6 76 155 8.30 49 0.060 0.500 0.140 0.005
15 30 0015 27.1 156
IS 30 0040 27.0 6.4 158 7.90 44 0.080 0.400 0.140 0.019
15 10 0052 25.7 0.6 173 6.80 48 0.080 0.400 0.450 0.012
15 30 0070 24.2 146
15 30 0095 21.3 0.1 163 6.70 53 0.530 0.900 0.090 0.013
15 30 0115 17.1 0.0 174 7.10 56 1.710 2.300 0.080 0.083
73/10/21 08 16 0000 21.2 36 182 7.20 42 0.050 0.400 0.320 0.016
08 IS 0005 21.2 4.8 182 7.10 42 0.040 0.200 0.310 0.014
08 IA 0015 21.2 4.8 18C 7.10 44 0.040 0.200 0.310 0.013
08 16 0030 21.2 4.6 182 7.10 45 0.040 0.200 0.320 0.015
08 IA 0050 ?0.d 3.8 190 7.00 45 0.080 0.300 0.330 0.0 16
08 IA 0078 19.3 3.6 201 7.00 46 0.220 0.500 0.320 0.017
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PilOS—TOT CHLRPHYL
FRO l OF A
TO UAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/25 IS 50 0000 0.019 4.2
IS 50 0004 0.019
IS 50 0015 0.020
IS 50 0025 0.017
15 50 0040 0.021
15 50 0065 0.033
15 50 0095 0.033
73/08/22 15 30 0000 ‘i.OIO 7.0
IS 30 0040 0.021
15 30 0052 3.022
15 30 0095 0.088
15 30 0I1 0.240
73/10/27 08 16 0000 0.026 1.1
08 I 0005 .023
08 16 0015 0.023
08 IA 0030 0.025
08 IS 0050 0.038
08 IA 0078 0.051
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET NETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 1AI
35 51 30.0 083 32 48.0 4
FRENCH 0AD RIVER
47 7.5 DOUGLAS DAM
0/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
kT 66 GROG GELO DAM
1 IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/0’./14 09 50 0.600 2.200 0.160 0.033 0.080
73/05/15 11 15 0.600 0.210 0.022 0.019 0.040
73/06/19 09 10 0.580 2.100 0.052 0.031 0.045
73/07/24 09 25 0.440 1.050 0.490 0.005K 0.030
73/08/23 10 00 0.300 0.720 0.198 0.007 0.020
73/09/20 09 30 0.086 0.370 0.113 0.00 5K 0.020
73/10/17 09 35 0.350 0.350 0.048 0.011 0.025
73/11/20 09 35 0.390 0.300 0.072 0.008 0.065
73/12/18 09 15 0.540 0.700 0.152 0.024 0.050
74/01/17 09 30 0.600 1.800 0.580 0.020 0.080
74/02/07 09 25 0.630 0.300 0.095 0.020 0.060
74/02/21 09 20 0.588 0.700 0.045 0.020 0.O 0
74/03/07 09 20 0.560 0.300 0.050 0.020 0.060
K VALUE PcNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4711A2
36 58 55.0 083 09 37.0 4
FRENCH 8ROAD RIVER
‘.7 7.5 NEWPORT
I/OOUGLAS LAKE 0 1492
US 411 9R06 1.5 MI NE OF NE PORT
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET P46/L MG/L 146/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 13 47 0.399 0,440 0.077 0.019 0.065
73/05/15 12 00 0.350 1.900 0.054 0.021 0.095
73/06/19 12 00 0.450 3.100 0.126 0.037 0.080
73/07/24 12 15 0.340 1.680 0.420 0.036 0.125
73/08/23 12 45 0.470 0.580 0.063 0.060 0.125
73/09/20 12 36 0.580 1.260 0.100 0.060 0.175
73/10/17 12 25 0.330 2.800 0.126 0.056 0.155
73/11/20 11 55 0.340 0 .9?5 0.264 0.068
73/12/18 12 05 C’.470 0.500 0.096 0.044 0.090
74/01/17 12 20 0.540 0.300 0.056 0.024 0.095
74/02/07 11 50 0.580 0.700 0.055 0.025 0.070
74/02/21 11 35 ).500 0.700 0.040 0.025 0.085
74/03/07 12 00 0.400 0.700 0.030 0.030 0.170
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 1 1
36 07 55.0 083 14 05.0 4
LONG CREEK (BAILEY BR)
47 H4M 3LEM CO MAP
1/DOUGLAS LAKE 040392
SEC RD BROG S MI SE MORRISTOWN
1 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL Nr13—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 15 00 1.100 0.160 0.015 0.007 0.015
73/05/15 13 10 1.120 0.575 G.011 0.010 0.025
73/06/19 13 50 1.260 0.190 0.017 0.009 0.029
73/07/24 13 30 1.100 0.800 0.357 0.014 0.040
73/08/23 13 55 1.020 0.420 0.050 0.012 0.020
73/09/20 13 35 0.790 1.050 0.220 0.015 0.025
73/10/17 13 25 0.600 0.350 0.022 0.016 0.040
73/11/20 12 55 0.300 0.250 0.020 0.005K 0.035
73/12/18 13 05 .950 0.?00 0.012 0.012 0.012
74/01/17 13 15 1.400 0.400 0.012 0.016 0.030
74/O /07 13 10 1.260 0.300 0.025 0.010 0.030
74/02/21 12 40 1.100 0.500 0.012 0.010 0.0 15
74/03/07 13 05 0.570 1.500 0.020 0.030
VMLUE l\lOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICj TEt)
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 IC1
36 07 50.0 083 13 15.0 4
NOLICHUCKY RIVER
47 HAMBLEM Co HAP
1/DOUGLAS LAKE 040392
H*Y URDG 1 MI NE OF POINT PLEASANT
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS Pt-lOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTr$O
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/I MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 14 4 0.680 0.260 0.034 0.0 17 0.045
73/05/15 13 00 0.530 0.240 0.012 0.019 0.060
73/06/1 13 40 0.640 0.560 0.044 0.035 0.125
73/07/2’. 13 10 0.470 0.580 0.200 0.020 0.100
73/08/23 13 45 0.560 0.920 0.058 0.019 0.090
73/09/20 13 ?5 0.620 0.400 0.048 0.037 .135
73/10/17 12 12 0.450 0.750 0.215 0.035 0.145
73/11/20 12 45 0.08’. 0.150 0.012 0.008 0.055
73/12/18 12 55 0.660 1.400 0.048 0.040 0.075
7’./01/17 13 05 0.970 0.500 0.032 0.020 0.070
74/02/07 13 00 0.850 0.400 0.020 0.015 0.060
74/02/21 12 ?5 0.780 0.400 3.015 0.015 0.060
74/03/07 13 00 0.640 0.800 0.020 0.030
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OATE 76/09/09
471101
36 02 25.0 083 11 32.0 4
CLAY CREEK
47 7.5 RANKIN
T/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
HANEY t RANCH RD BROG 1 t4 1 SW OF BYBEE
I1EPALES 211120’.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTPIO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MC /L
MG/L P
MG/I R
73/04/14
14
13
0.015
0.240
0.012
0.005K
0.010
73/05/15
12
?0
0.110
1.540
0.046
0.007
0.015
73/06/19
12
40
3.390
1.980
0.066
0.023
0.035
73/07/24
12
40
0.150
0.520
0.198
0.010
0.040
73/08/23
13
15
0.078
0.920
0.130
0.017
0.040
73/09/20
12
50
(.050
0.790
3.176
0.024
0.040
73/10/17
12
45
0.036
0.400
0.030
0.030
0.055
73/11/20
12
15
0.012
0.150
0.008
0.016
0.050
73/12/18
12
30
0.076
0.500
0.012
0.012
0.020
74/01/17
12
35
G.552
0.800
0.024
0.020
0.030
74/02/07
12
10
).560
0.400
0.015
0.010
0.025
74/02/21
12
00
0.400
0.900
0.020
0.010
0.020
74/03/07
12
25
0.450
0.700
0.010
0.025
K VALUE KNOWN TO t E
LESS tHAN INOICATEI )
-------
STORET RETPIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4711E1
36 Sb 06.0 083 06 15.0 4
PIGEON RIVER
47 7.5 NEWPORT
T/DOUGLAS LAKE 052092
3ANK 4 P41 N OF NEWPONT
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET 14G/L MG/L MG/L 14G/L P HG/L P
73/04/14 13 19 0.540 0.600 0.120 0.040 0.097
73/05/15 14 30 0.380 2.520 0.120 0.036 0.100
73/Ob/19 14 50 0.540 0.750 0.220 0.063 0.165
73/C7/24 14 45 0.470 1.100 0.560 0.069 0.130
73/08/23 15 00 0.570 1.030 0.126 0.063 0.113
73/09/20 15 40 1.000 2.300 0.150 0.088 0.230
73/10/17 14 25 1.140 0.900 0.066 0.048 0.110
73/11/20 14 no 1.120 1.400 0.330 0.216 0.460
73/12/18 14 00 0.620 0.800 0.306 0.058 0.125
74/01/17 14 15 0.600 0.500 0.076 0.048 0.135
74/02/07 14 35 3.528 0.400 0.090 0.035 0.115
74/02/?1 13 ?0 C.552 0.900 .100 0.045 0.115
76/03/07 14 05 0.560 1.000 0.158 0.090 0.260
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/09/09
471 IGI
35 55 50.0 083 20 ‘.0.0 4
CLEAR CR .EIc
47 7.5 CPIESTNUT HIL
T/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
BROG SECONDAY RD W EDGE OF CI-4ESTNUT HIL
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTtI N02&N03 TOT KJEL NHJ—N PHOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROP 1 OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 10 55 1.0 0 0.540 0.025 0.060 0.130
73/05/15 11 55 1.100 0.740 0.031 0.021 0.040
73/06/19 10 05 1.140 0.270 0.018 0.063 0.105
73/07/24 11 15 0.960 0.520 0.230 0.077 0.100
73/08/23 10 45 1.020 0.480 0.085 0.215 0.240
73/09/16 10 20 0.860 1.760 0.066 0.100 0.120
73/10/17 10 30 1.100 0.150 0.038 0.115 0.145
73/11/20 10 15 1.010 0.300 0.026 0.136 0.180
73/12/18 10 10 1.700 3.000 0.176 0.352 0.680
74/01/17 10 30 1.680 0.900 0.052 0.132 0.270
74/02/07 10 20 1.180 0.600 0.030 0.035 0.090
74/02/21 10 15 1.040 0.550 0.035 0.040 0.075
74/03/07 10 15 0.950 0.500 0.020 0.060 0.145
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 1H1
35 54 45.0 083 26 50.0 4
FLAT CREEK
47 7.5 SHADY GROVE
T/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
E DERRICK CEMETERY 12M1 W FAIR GARDEN
1IEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 11 iS 0.820 0.210 0.063 0.008 0.015
73/05/15 11 15 0.810 0.140 0.009 0.008 0.020
73/06/19 10 25 1.020 0.890 0.038 0.021 0.035
73/07/24 14 35 0.780 1.100 0.670 0.011 0.045
73/08/23 11 05 0.570 0.960 0.073 0.017 0.030
73/09/16 10 40 0.560 0.580 0.028 0.015 0.030
73/10/17 10 50 3.470 0.300 0.035 0.019 0.025
73/11/20 10 35 0.340 0.100K 0.008 0.008 0.035
73/12/18 10 30 0.792 0.200 6.016 0.016 0.U45
74/01/17 10 50 1.180 0.100 0.012 0.016 0.035
74/02/07 10 40 1.010 0.400 0.010 0.010 0.035
74/02/21 10 40 0.930 0.700 0.020 0.010 0.020
74/03/07 10 3 0.704 0.600 0.020 0.025
K VALUE PcNOWN TO bE
LESS THMN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 1JI
36 06 18.0 083 15 55.0 4
LEADYALE CREEK
47 7.5 WHITE PINE
T/DOUGLAS LAKE
t3RDG SECONDARY RD
1 1EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
040391
1MI ESE WHITE PINE
2111204
CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
N02&N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PHOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L.
MG/L P
MG/L P
73/04/14
15
30
0.357
0.520
0.082
0.023
0.040
73/05/15
14
05
0.350
0.950
0.078
0.007
0.030
73/06/19
14
15
0.410
0.580
0.027
0.021
0.035
73/07/24
13
45
0.082
2.730
1.370
0.012
0.055
73/08/23
14
15
0.130
1.050
0.168
0.008
0.020
73/09/16
14
00
0.126
1.600
0.965
0.016
0.060
73/10/17
13
50
0.520
1.180
0.100
0.015
0.080
73/11/20
13
15
0.570
1.250
0.128
0.008
0.090
73/12/18
13
25
0.132
0.100
0.020
0.016
0.040
74/01/17
13
45
0.616
0.500
0.014
0.020
0.030
74/02/07
13
40
0.792
0.500
0.020
0.015
0.035
74/02/21
12
50
0.620
1.100
0.015
0.010
0.070
74/03/07
13
20
0.560
1.000
0.060
0.075
0.160
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
471 IK1
36 01 30.0 083 24 11.0 4
UNNAMD CREEK
47 7.5 JEFFERSON CI
1/DOUGLAS LAKE 040392
BROG Si RI 66A IN DAND IDGE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTr4 NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—OIS PHOS—TOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/14 10 25 0.990 3.500 0.098 0.009 0.015
73/05/15 10 30 1.020 3.800 0.120 0.010 0.020
73/06/19 09 35 1.000 1.540 0.038 0.018 0.020
73/07/24 19 50 0.840 0.435 0.240 0.010 0.025
73/08/23 11 15 0.850 0.380 0.068 0.018 0.020
73/09/16 09 50 0.820 0.200 ( 1.013 0.031 0.035
73/10/17 10 00 0.820 0.550 0.023 0.029 0.05 5
73/11/20 09 50 0.740 0.100K 0.012 0.005K 0.040
73/12/18 09 40 0.960 2.100 0.024 0.008 0.010
74/01/17 09 48 1.100 0.400 0.008 0.008 0.015
74/02/07 09 50 1.040 0.400 0.010 0.005K 0.005
74/02/21 09 50 1.060 0.400 0.030 0.005K 0.005
74/03/07 09 45 0.920 0.200 0.005 0.015 0.025
K VALUE KNU N TO B
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
47 11JA A 4711JA P001532
36 06 12.0 083 16 45.0 4
Wr$ITE PINE
47 7.5 WHITE PINE
1/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
LEADVALE CREEK
I IEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET MG/L HG/L M /L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
73/06/05 08 00
CP(T)— 5.000 1.800 0.237 5.400 6.100 0.200 0.300
73/06/05 16 00
73/07/18 08 00
CP(T)— 5.200 2.800 0.040 14.000 15.000 0.100 0.170
73/07/18 16 00
73/08/13 08 00
CP(T)— 9.300 0.130 0.077 13.800 14.000 0.100 0.100
73/08/13 16 00
73/09/10 08 00
CP(T)— 37.200 0.650 0.126 28.500 28.500 0.100 0.100
13/09/10 16 00
73/10/15 08 00
CP(T)— 31.100 0.800 0.044 32.000 39.000 0.090 0.100
73/10/IS 16 00
73/11/07 08 00
CP(T)— 20.400 0.950 0.054 20.500 21.500 0.100 0.100
73/11/07 16 00
73/12/Il 08 00
CP(T)— 12.000 3.200 0.073 18.000 18.800 0.100 0.100
73/12/lI 16 00
74/01/02 08 00
CP(T)— 4.200 0.500K 0.080 4.500 5.000 0.300 0.100
74/01/02 16 00
74/02/05 08 00
CP(T)— 6.100 1.000K 0.040K 4.400 5.300 0.500 0.300
74/02/05 16 00
74/03/08 08 00
CP(T)— 10.900 1.000K 0.069 8.100 0.300 0.300
74/03/08 16 00
74/04/tO 08 00
CP(T)— 9.600 1.000K 0.064 4.500 4.700 0.300 0.300
74/04/10 16 On
74/05/07 08 00
CR 11)— 16.800 1.100 0.110 11.000 14.000 0.100 0.200
74/05/07 16 00
K VALUE r(NO N TO bE
LLSS IHAN Il 1OICA1EL)
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4711JA AS471 IJA P00153
36 06 12.0 083 16 45.0 4
WHITE PINE
47 1.5 Wr4ITE PINE
T/DOUGLAS LAKE 040391
LEADVALE CREEK
I1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLO*—MGD
TO DAY FEET HG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/I P INST MGD MONTHLY
74/06/11 08 00
CP(T)— 11.800 3.600 0.050 9.950 10.250 0.090 0.100
74/06/11 16 00
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY LIES IN 1974
STATE OF TENNESSEE
-------
LAcC LATA rt) ‘ E L )EJ I 4 ‘ AP . L’ (’S
LA U ‘EL)1 . M ’1A\ D00 ‘4EA’ 1 1Lui N
CODE LAKE P 4ME rUT L 1 1 lU ’ ME C C LJ A 1, •j1 S J4I U
L.1O1 LAKE 3AP I LtY O.12 . D. O 473. 3 81 12.7 j 10.400 0.0’7
‘ T C’. IU 1E ESL VOiw 0.05? 0. 9S 442.071 11.415 14. 0
47(J CMLATP AM ESERVOI 0.14? O. 6G 473.800 6.160 0.0 3’.
..707 C4. O EE LAPSE 0.OS I 0.780 4 .b61 12.162 15.000 0.022
4708 Cr11C cA’4AU(,A LA’\E 0.031 O.’.40 463.833 3.111 .a00 0.012
4711 )OUULAS LAKE 0.026 .4’ .) 442.823 ‘..553 15.000 0.01 .
4712 FO 1 LOUOON ESE VO1 Q.3 4 0.S50 465.b?1 £..776 12.600 0.025
4713 G’ 1AT FALLS LA
-------
PERtXNT uF L KES WITh HI& )1ER VAL JES NUM3ER OF LAKES WITh r1JChE’ VFLULS)
MEDIAN MEDIAN
TOTAL P INO G N
500—
HEAN
CPILOMA
15— MEDIAN INOEX
HIN DO DISS ORTHO e
LAKE
CODE
LAKE NAME
MEAN SEC
4701
LAKE BAPKLEY
13 4
2)
“0 4
6)
13 4 2)
(
1)
73 ( 11)
13
2)
159
4704
BOONE RESERVOIR
40 4
6)
0 4
0)
73 4 11)
20 4
3)
47 4 7)
20 4
3)
200
4706
CHEATHAM RESERVOIR
7 4 1)
47 4
7)
7 4 1)
40 4
6)
90 4 13)
0 4
0)
191
4707
CHEROKEE LAKE
SO ( 7)
7 4 1)
53 4 8)
13 4
2)
13 ( 0)
40 4
6)
176
4708
CHICKAMAUGA LAKE
67 ( 10)
63 4 9)
33 ( 5)
93 4
14)
90 4 13)
70 ( 10)
416
4111
DOUGIAS LAKE
73 ( 11)
63 ( 9)
7 ( 10)
80 4
12)
13 C 0)
60 4 9)
356
4712
FORT LOUDON RESERVOIR
33 4 5)
20 C 3)
27 ( 4)
73 (
1 1)
60 ( 9)
27 4 4)
240
4713
GREAT FALLS LAKE
87 ( 13)
73 C 11)
60
4 9)
87 4
13)
40 C 6)
93 4 14)
440
4717
NICKAJACP( RESERVOIR
50 C 7)
33 ( 5)
47 4 7)
100 4
15)
80 4 12)
33 ( 5)
343
4720
OLD HICPORY LAKE
20 4 3)
80 ( 12)
20
4 3)
33 4
5)
100 ( 15)
53 4 8)
306
4722
WATTS BAR RESERVOIR
60 C 9)
27 4 4)
40
4 6)
67 4
10)
67 ( 10)
70 1 10)
331
4723
J. PERCY PRIEST RESERVOI
27 C 4)
100 C 15)
80
4 12)
27 4
4)
13 ( 0)
41 1 7)
294
4724
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
80 4 12)
53 C 8)
100
( 15)
60 1
9)
33 C 5)
80 C 12)
406
4725
SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE
100 C 15)
13 C )
93
C 14)
47 1
7)
13 C 0)
87 4 13)
353
4727
REELFOOT LAKE
0 ( 0)
3 C 14)
0
C 0)
0 4
0)
53 C 8)
7 C 1)
153
4728 WOODS RESERVOIR
93 ( 14) 87 ( 13) 87 4 13) 53 1 8) 13 ( 0) 100 1 15)
433
------- |