U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                        WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                             REPORT
                                               ON
                                     TIMS FORD AND WOCDS RESERVOIRS
                                  mORE, FRANKLIN, AND COFFE OXNTIES
                                             TENNESSE
                                           EPA REGION IV
                                        WORKING PAPER No, 455
     CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                                 and
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•jVG.P.O. 699-440

-------
                               REPORT
                                 ON
                    TIMS FORD AND WOODS RESERVOIRS
                MOORE, FRANKLIN, AND COFFEE COUNTIES

                            EPA REGION IV
                        WORKING PAPER No, 455
     WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
               AND THE
      TENNESSEE I^ATIONAL GUARD
           SEPTEMBER 1976

-------
I
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
Li.st of Study Lakes - Tennessee iv
Lake and Drainage Area Maps v - vi
Sections
I. Conclusions
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Surnniary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 14
V. Literature Reviewed 21
VI. Appendices 22

-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated In 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to Investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey’s eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
plannin9 [ 3O3(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
L 3O3(c)1, clean lakes [ 3l4(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
L lO6 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
•111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation’s freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by
lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and to augment plans implenentation by the
states.
AC KNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency) expresses si’ncere appreciation to the Tennessee Department
of Public Health for professional involvement, to the Tennessee
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase
of the Survey, and to those Tennessee wastewater treatment
plant operators who provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Quality Control , Tennessee
Department of Public Health; the Division of Environmental
Planning, Tennessee Valley Authority; and the Nashville District
Corps of Engineers provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General William C. Smith, former Adjutant General
of Tennessee, and Project Officer Colonel Wilburn C. Johnson,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Tennessee National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.

-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Chi ckamauga
Doug 1 as
Fort Loudon
Great Falls
141 ckaj ack
Old Hickory
Percy Priest
Reelfoot
South Hoiston
urns Ford
Watts Bar
COUNTY
Stewart, Montgomery
(Trigg, Lyon in KY)
Washington, Sullivan,
Carter
Cheatham,
Jefferson
Grai nger,
Hamilton,
McMinn
Sevier, Jefferson, Cocke
Loudon, Knox, Blount
White, Van Buren
Marion, Hamilton
Sumner, Davidson, Wilson,
Smith, Trousdale
Davidson, Rutherford
Obion
Sullivan (Washington in
VA)
Moore, Franklin
Rhea, Meigs, Cumberland,
Roane, Loudon
Franklin, Coffee
LAKE NAME
Bark 1 ey
Boone
Cheatham
Cherokee
Davidson
Hamblen,
Hawkins
Rhea, Meigs,
Woods (Elk River)

-------
86 1O’
35•30’
Manchester
x
WOODS RESERVOIR
Sewage Treatment Facility
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Drainage Area Boundary
9gpi IpKin .
6 - ‘ ‘ ‘ Mi.
C
Map Location
Sca 1 e
Tullahoma
5
f
I
White City

-------
TIMS FORD RESERVOIR
Tributary Sa o 1r ; 51:e
X Lake Sar p1i ; Site
T Sewage Treatx ient Faclflty
rainage rea Bouidary
I
LII enn.
Map Location

-------
REPORT ON WOODS RESERVOIR AND TIllS FORD RESERVOIR
STORET NOS. 4728 and 4724
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Woods and Tims Ford Reservoirs are considered eutrophic.
Dissolved oxygen concentrations in Woods Reservoir were
severely depressed or depleted below 25 feet during
summer sampling with hydrogen sulfide production detected
during both summer and fall. Secchi disc visibility was
quite low; chlorophyll a levels in the lake ranged from
1.2 pg/i to 14.0 pg/i with a mean of 7.4 pg/l.
While Survey data (especially low dissolved oxygen
values in the hypolimnion) suggest that urns Ford is eu-
trophic, it must be taken into account that the reservoir
was only two years old at the time of sampling. Decompo-
sition of the organic load in new reservoirs often results
in severe depression in oxygen levels and simultaneous
nutrient releases. Thus, although the water clarity was
high and nutrient levels moderate at the time of sampling,
a tentative assignment of eutrophic is warranted in the case
of Tinis Ford Reservoir. The water quality should be
*See Appendix E.

-------
2
reevaluated to determine whether dissolved oxygen
levels remain badly depressed or whether by this time
a less eutrophic condition characterizes the reservoir.
Survey limnologists reported emergent and submerged
vegetation in Uoods Reservoir, but no algal blooms were
noted on either lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that ! ‘Ioods and Tims
Ford Reservoirs were limited by available phosphorus.
Spikes with phosphorus or phosphorus and nitrogen sirnul-
taneously resulted in increased assay yields. Addition
of nitrogen alone did not stimulate a growth response.
The ratios of available inorganic nitrogen to orthophos-
phorus (N/P) in both lakes substantiate these results.

-------
3
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from point sources
was estimated to be 30.4% of the total reaching l’Joods
Reservoir. The Arnold Engineering Development Testing
Area contributed 22.9% of the total, and the city of
Monteagle contributed 6.8%.
Point sources contributed 55.3% of the total phos-
phorus load to urns Ford Reservoir. The city of Tulla-
homa contributed 31.5% and the city of Winchester contri-
buted 12.3% of the total load estimates.
The calculated annual phosphorus loadings of 1 .08
and 1.35 g P/rn 2 /yr for Woods and urns Ford Reservoirs,
respectively, are slightly greater than Vollenweider’s
(1975) proposed “eutrophic” loading for lakes with such
volumes and retention times. Elimination of the known
point sources impacting the two reservoirs would lower
these annual loading rates to below Vollenweider’s “eu-
trophic” levels, and further improve the existing water
quality of these two Elk River impoundments.

-------
4
2. I4onpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus loads from nonpoint
sources impacting Woods and urns Ford Reservoir, res-
pectively, were 69.6% and 68.5% of the total phos-
phorus loads. 1easured tributaries accounted for
46.2% of the total reaching Woods Reservoir and 41.5%
reaching Tins Ford Reservoir. Ungaged drainage areas
were estimated to have contributed 21.7% and 1.9%,
respectively.

-------
5
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometry data for urns Ford Reservoir were provided by
the Tennessee Valley Authority; tributary flow data were pro-
vided by the Tennessee District Office of the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS). Mean hydraulic retention time for Woods Reser-
voir was provided by the Tennessee Valley Authority and for Tims
Ford Reservoir was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
mean flow of the outlet. Drainage area for tributary A-2, Elk
River (Tims Ford Reservoir) was provided by the Tennessee Valley
Authority. Tributary drainage areas plus the urns Ford lake
surface area do not equal the outlet drainage area probably be-
cause of differences in the pool elevation used by the different
sources in their calculations. Precipitation values are esti-
mated by methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey
(NES) Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conver-
sions is included as Appendix A.
A. Lake 1orphornetry:
Woods Tims Ford
Reservoir Reservoir
1. Surface area: 16.11 42.90 km 2 .
2. Mean depth: 5.7 15.2 meters.
3. Maximum depth: Unknown 43.6 meter
4. Volume: 91 .827 749.968 x 10 b m
5. Mean hydraulic
retention time: 85 300 days.

-------
2 Outlets -
A(1) Elk River
Drainage Me n flow
area(km ) ( m-’/sec )
2269 543
16.7 0 30
14.1 0.25
11.9 0.21
46.9 0.84
130.8 2.35
17.7 0.46
3.0 008
Name
A(1) Elk River
B(1) Taylor Creek
C(1) Rock Creek
D(l) Little Hurricane Creek
E(l) Turkey Creek
F(l) Hurricane Creek
G(l) Dry Creek
H(l) Boiling Fork Creek
J(l) Wagner Creek
K(1) Hessey Creek
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage -
Totals
A(2) Elk River
C. Precipitation
Tims Ford
Reservoir
197 .4
135 9
centimeters.
cer ’timeters
B. Tributary and Outlet (see Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Woods Reservoir
Tims Ford Reservoir
Name
A(2)
B(l)
C(l)
0(1)
E(l)
F(l)
G(l)
H(l)
Elk River
Chi der Creek
Gum Creek
Yellow Branch
Beans Creek
Bradley Creek
Rollins Creek
Unnamed Creek in
Lawson Hollow
Drai nag
area (km )
730 4
17 8
106.7
5.9
10.1
9.7
59 6
271 9
43.8
26 9
57 0
1,339.8
Mean flow
( m 3 /sec )
13.03
0.30
1 .82
0 10
0.16
0 17
1 02
4.63
O-.75
0.46
1.71
24 15
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage -
Totals
197.7
665.7
3.51
13.43
681 2 12.48
1. Year of sampling:
2 Mean annual
1,3701 2289
Woods
Reservoir
197 4
135.9

-------
7
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Woods and urns Ford Reservoirs were sampled three times
during the open-water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-
equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical
and chemical parameters were collected from four stations on
Woods Reservoir and six stations on Tins Ford Reservoir and
from one or more depths at each station (see maps, pages v
and vi). During each visit, depth-integrated samples were
collected from each station for chlorophyll a analysis and
phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the
first visit to each reservoir, an 18.9-liter depth-integrated
sample was composited for algal assays. Maximum depths
sampled were 17.1 meters at Station 1, 7.6 meters at
Station 2, 13.7 meters at Station 3, and 17.1 meters at
Station 4 on Woods Reservoir, and 43.9 meters at Station 1,
40.8 meters at Station 2, 35.1 meters at Station 3, 21.3 meters
at Station 4, 22.6 meters at Station 5, and 8.8 meters at
Station 6 on urns Ford Reservoir. For a more detailed ex-
planation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in III A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phtyoplankton
counts and chlorophyll a determinations are included in Iii B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III C.

-------
° N NO. OF SAMPLES
5/21/73 )
( 8/15/73 )
( 10/2J/73
MAX
MA&
MAX
50*0 =
L
DEPTH
RAN(,E
5*0* =
4
DEPTH
RANGE
S *
.
DEPTH
RANGE
WOODS RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 4728
PHYSICAL
AND CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER N°
RANGE
MEDIAN
(METERS)
N*
RANGE
MEDIAN
(METERS)
NO
RANt,E
MLI)IAN
(ME1t pLS)
TEMPERATURE (DEU CENT)
Q .— ).5 H DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH°° 4
18.7—120.0
17.4— 18.9
84.0
17.5
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
26.7— 70.0
16.’e— 25.0
30.9
21.2
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
18.8—105.0
18.6— 20.0
21.0
19.0
0.0— 1.s
1.2— 16.8
DISSOL /EO OXYGEN (MG/U
0.—1.5 M OEPTH 1
MAX OEPTH** 4
7.2— 7.2
3.6— 6.6
7.2
6.3
1.2— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
4
4
6.8— 7.6
0.3— 5.3
7.2
2.5
1.5— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
5
4
6.4— 12.6
1.6— 11.8
8.6
7.5
0.3— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
CONDUCTIVITY (UMMOS)
0.—1.5 14 DEPTH 5
4AX DEPTH°° 4
160.— 215.
155.— 220.
170.
183.
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
136.— 177.
142.— 199.
139.
177.
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
130.— 163.
145.— 163.
133.
13.
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
0.—1.5 M DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH 0 ° 4
7.7— 8.2
7.5— 7.7
7.8
7.6
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
7.8— 8.6
7.0— 7.7
8.1
7.4
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
7.5— 9.2
7.0— 8.9
8.1
7.6
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/L)
0.—1.S r4 DE TH 5
MAX DEPTH° 0 4
56.— 89.
56.— 93.
64.
70.
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
55.— o2.
77.— 97.
60.
88.
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
67.— 95.
76.— 95.
70.
88.
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.—1.5 N DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH°° 4
0.011—0.037
0.014—0.027
0.016
0.021
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
0.014—0.044
0.02b—0.071
0.019
0.038
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
0.013—0.034
0.013—0.035
0.01
0.023
0.0— 1.s
1.2— 16.8
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/L)
0.—1.5 N DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH°° 4
0.002—0.004
0.002—0.006
0.003
0.002
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
0.004—0.009
0.006—0.020
0.008
0.008
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
0.003—0.006
0.004—0.006
O.OOD
0.005
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
NO?.M03 (P1G/L)
O.—1.5 M DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH00 ‘.
0.490—0.830
0.490—0.920
0.540
0.590
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
0.050—0.220
0.100—0.660
0.080
0.250
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
0.030—0.070
0.020—0.100
0.0’.0
0.075
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
AMMONIA (MG/L)
o.—l.5 N DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH ° ° 4
0.050—0.120
0.070—0.130
0.060
0.125
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
0.060—0.090
0.170—0.740
0.075
0.405
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
0.040—0.100
0.040—0.090
0.060
0.0Th
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
KJELDAKL N (MG/L)
.—1.5 H DEPTH 5
MAX DEPTH°° 4
0.300—0.900
0.200—0.500
0.400
0.300
0.0— 1.2
2.1— 17.1
8
4
0.400—1.000
0.600—1.300
0.550
0.850
0.0— 1.5
3.0— 17.1
9
4
0.200—0.600
0.200—1.100
0.400
0.300
0.0— 1.5
1.2— 16.8
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
0
000000000*
*0*0*
0
0000000000
*0*0*
0
0*0*0—00*0*
*0*0*
0 ,
*0 MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
°°° S = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE

-------
° N = NO. OF SAMPLES
0* MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
° S = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
5/21/73 )
( 8/15/73 )
( 10/23/73
= 6
=
6 DEPTH
S° O =
MAX
MAA
DEPTH
r ANGE
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 4724
HYS1CAL
AND CrILMICAL
CHARACtEi IST1CS
PARAMETER NO
RANGE
MEDIAN
(METERS)
N 0
RAN6 .
MEDIAN
(METERS)
NO
RANGE
MEDiAN
(METERS)
TEMPERATURE DEG CENT)
0.—I.5 H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTM** 6
60.0— 96.0
9.4— 17.2
84.0
12.6
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
28.3—108.0
11.7— 24.3
50.6
15.6
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
6
20.9—169.0
13.3— 19.3
idO.U
16.b
0.0— 1.5
8.d— 40.8
DISSOLVEI) OXYGEN (MG/L)
O.—1.5 M DEPTH 0
MAX DEPTH*0 6
°° °°*°*
0.8— 5.0
*0*0*
1.6
****00600
7.9— 43.9
6
6
1.8— 8.0
0.2— 5.0
7.6
0.5
1.5— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
1
5
8.8— 8.8
0.2— 2.8
8.8
0.4
1.5— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOS)
0.—l.5 H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 00 6
135.— 205.
140.— 260.
140.
180.
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
127.— 143.
126.— 195.
130.
166.
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
6
120.— 139.
131.— 222.
121.
204.
0.0— 1.S
8.8— 40.8
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
0.—1.5 M DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 00 6
8.5— 8.9
7.2— 7.8
8.5
7.4
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
8.0— 8.5
6.7- 7.4
8.2
6.9
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
5
7.2— 8.0
6.8— 7.2
7.3
6.8
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
TOTAL ALPcALINITY (MG/L)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 0 6
49. 93.
51.— 126.
54.
71.
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
‘i.9.— 72.
71.— 115.
57.
101.
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
5
50.— 67.
66.— 124.
61.
109.
0.0— 1.D
}7.7— 40.8
TOTAL P (MG/I)
0.—).5 H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 0 ° 6
0.016—0.030
0.018—0.165
0.018
0.047
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
0.016—0.090
0.018—0.167
0.020
0.106
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
S
0.017—0.037
0.035—0.7’ 6
0.026
0.396
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/L)
0.—1.S H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 0 0 6
0.002—0.010
0.006—0.087
0.004
0.016
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
0.004—0.015
0.008—0.022
0.007
0.019
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
5
0.004—0.012
0.005—0.016
0.007
0.011
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
N02.N03 (HG/L)
0.—1.5 H DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTN 0 ° 6
0.330—0.570
0.170—0.940
0.395
0.605
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
0.040—0.060
0.070—0.450
0.060
0.110
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
S
0.020—0.040
0.020—0.120
0.030
0.030
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
AMMONIA (MG/I)
O.—I.5 N DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH° 0 6
0.030—0.160
0.040—0.530
0.060
0.190
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
0.050—0.080
0.100—1.450
0.060
0.900
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
5
0.030—0.050
0.340—2.420
0.040
2.000
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
KJELDAHL N (MG/I)
0.—1.5 N DEPTH 6
MAX DEPTH 00 6
0.200—0.700
0.200—0.600
0.350
0.350
0.0— 0.0
7.9— 43.9
12
6
0.200—0.700
0.400—2.000
0.350
1.200
0.0— 1.5
7.6— 42.7
7
5
0.300—0.500
0.700—2.900
0.400
2.300
0.0— 1.5
17.7— 40.8
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
0
6*0*0—00*0*
*00*0
0
*D*** *D0*0
0*0*0
0
00000000 00
0

-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton —
Woods Reservoir
urns Ford Reservoir
Asterionella
Flagellates
Fragi 1 aria
Melosira
Di nob ryon
Other genera
Total
1. Scenedesmus
2. Flagellates
3. Synedra
4. Tetraedron
5. Blue—green
filament
500
373
34
20
15
20
962
3,434
2,026
1 ,482
518
346
1. Flagellates
2. Melosira
3. Asterionella
4. Fragilaria
5. Synedra
Other genera
Achnanthes
Flagellates
Tetraedron
Lyngbya
Ana baena
1 ,858
1 ,728
597
160
150
489
415
228
187
179
Dominant
Genera
Algal
Units
per ml
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dominant
Genera
Algal
Units
per ni
Sampling
Date
05/21/73
08/1 5/73
10/23/73
Sampling
Date
05/21 /75
08/1 5/73
10/23/73
c
Total 4,707
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Scenedesmus
3. Synedra
4. Dinobryon
5. Melosira
Other genera
717
8,523
1 ,160
102
76
38
25
76
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Nitzchia
3. Melosira
4. Achnanthes
5. Cyclotella
Other genera
527
2,025
1 ,343
290
221
124
111
388
Total 1,477
Total 2,477

-------
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling
Date
Woods Reservoir
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
13.3
13.6
3.1
7.6
9.0
5.3
7.0
5.1
14.0
1.2
4.5
5.0
Sampling
Date
urns Ford Reservoir
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
08/15/73 1
2
3
4
5
6
10/23/73 1
2
3
4
5
6
Chlorophyll a
(ugh)
6.0
8.3
10.0
5.8
5.3
14.6
6.0
7.5
7.2
8.1
7.5
10.1
2.1
2.4
2.2
3.9
6.0
8.3
Chlorophyll a
(uci/l) —
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
05/21/ 73
08/1 5/73
10/23/73
05/21/ 73
05/22/73

-------
Spike(mg/l )
Stations 1, 2, 3, 4
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Ortho P Inorganic N
Conc. (mg/i) Conc. (mg/i )
Stations 1, 2, 3
0.008
0.058
0.058
0.008
Stations 4, 5, 6
0.032
0.082
0.082
0.032
Maximum Yield
( mg/i-dry wt. )
0.1
8.9
16.8
0.1
0.1
9.0
16.7
0.1
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Woods Reservoir
Ortho P
Inorganic N
Maximum Yield
Conc.(rng/i)
Conc.(mg/i)
(mg/i—dry wt.)
Tims Ford Reservoir
0.004
0.618
0.1
0.054
0.618
14.4
0.054
1.618
18.8
0.004
1.618
0.1
0.620
0.620
1 .620
1.620
-I
0.688
0.688
1.688
1.688

-------
13
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum
capricornutum , indicates that the potentials for
primary productivity in Woods and urns Ford Reservoirs
were low at the time of sampling. The lakes were
phosphorus limited at the time as indicated by the
increased growth of the test alga in response to the
addition of orthophosphorus. Spikes with nitrogen and
phosphorus simultaneously resulted in maximum yield
while the addition of nitrogen alone did not stimulate
growth beyond the control yield.
The mean total available nitrogen to orthophosphorus
ratios in Woods and urns Ford Reservoirs were respectively
25/1 or greater, and 35/1 or greater on all three sampling
dates, further indicating phosphorus limitation in the
two reservoirs.

-------
14
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Tennessee
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the maps (pages v and
vi), except for the high runoff months of February and March
when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in April
1973 and was completed in Iiarch 1974.
Through an intera jency agreement, stream flow estimates
for the year of sampling and a “normalized or average year
were provided by the Tennessee District Office of USGS for the
tributary sites nearest each lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries,
except Rollins Creek, Beans Creek (Woods), and Hurricane Creek
(urns Ford), were determined by using a modification of a USGS
computer program for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient
loads indicated for tributaries are those measured minus known
point 1
source oads, if any
Nutrient loadings for unsampled “minor tributaries and
imediate drainage” (“ZZ” of USGS), Rollins Creek, Beans Creek
(Woods), and Hurricane Creek (urns Ford), were estimated by
using the mean annual nutrient loads, in kg/km 2 /yr, for Childer
Creek, Gum Creek, and Unnamed Stream at Stations B(l), C(l),
and H(l) on Woods Reservoir, the mean loads for Little Hurricane

-------
15
Creek, Turkey Creek, and Dry Creek at Stations D(1), E(l),
and G(1) on Tims Ford Reservoir, and multiplying the means
by the appropriate drainage area in km 2 .
The operators of the Cowan, Tullahoma, and Winchester
wastewater treatment plants provided monthly effluent sam-
pies and corresponding flow data. Nutrient loads for Decherd,
Motlow State Junior College, and Arnold Engineering Development
Testing Area wastewater treatment plants were estimated at
1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr. The Monteagle wastewater
treatment plant was estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N!
capita/yr plus loadings from 750 extra persons served during
the months of July and August.
Several other point sources exist which are known to im-
pact Woods and Tims Ford Reservoirs (Tennessee Department of
Public Health, 1975). These include the University of Tennessee
Space Institute Student Center and the Arnold Air Force Officers
Quarters Sewage Treatment Facility, both at Woods Reservoir;
the Holiday Inn and Interstate 24 Rest Area, into Gilliam Creek;
St. Andrews School into Snake Rag Branch; and the Arnold Air
Force J-5 Rocket Preparation Building, which impacts Rollins
Creek. These sources are not included in the nutrient budget on
pages 17 and 18.

-------
16
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop.* Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment* ( m 3 /d x 103) Water*
Woods Reservoir
Arnold Engineering 3,300 1. 2.695 Rollins
Development Testing Creek
Area (AEDC)
(AEX) Arnold Village 100 2. 0.057 Brumalow
Creek
4onteagle 850** 3. 0.643 Gillianis
Creek! Dry
Creek/ Elk
River
urns Ford Reservoir
Winchester 5,680 1. 1.972 Elk River
Tullahoma*** 14,400 4. 10,556 Rock Creek
Cowan 1,940 1. 0.818 Boiling
Fork Creek
Decherd 2,110 1. 0.799± Wagner
Creek
Motlow State 900 4. 0.341± Hurricane
Junior College Creek
Key: 1. Trickling filter
2. Activated sludge
3. Extended aeration
4. Tertiary
*Treatment plant questionnaires; S. Fishel, personal communication.
**750 additional persons served during the months of July and August.
***70% of waste load during the summer contributed by tanning industry.
-rEstimated at 0.3785 m 3 /capita/day.

-------
17
Source ________ ______ _______
a Tributaries (nonpoint load) —
A(2) Elk River
B(l) Childer Creek
C(l) Gum Creek
D(l) Yellow Branch
E(1) Beans Creek
F(l) Bradley Creek
(l) Rollins Creek
H(l) Unnamed Creek
b. Minor tributaries and imediate
drainage (nonpoint load) -
c Known municipal SIP’s -
Arnold Engineering
Development Center
Arnold Village
Mon teagl e
d Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial - Flone
f. Direct preclpitat lon** -
Totals
2. Output - A(1) Elk River
3. Net annual P accumulation —
*Est 1 te based on 6 residences, 1 park, and 1 camp for Woods Reservoir.
Estimate based on 70 lakeside residences and 1 camp for Tims Ford Reservoir.
**Estimated (see liES Working Paper No. 175).
% of
kg P/yr total
26.5
04
1.7
0.2
0.3
0.3
2.3
5.5
4.1
0.9
1.9
12.3
31.5
4.4
4.4
1.9
<0.1
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1 Inputs -
Woods Reservoir
Tims Ford Reservoir
Source
a.
kg P/yr
% of
total
Tributaries (nonpoint load) —
2,725
335
255
240
845
2,785
320
45
16.7
2.0
1 6
1.5
5.2
17.0
2.0
0.3
A(1) Elk River
8(1) Taylor Creek
C(l) Rock Creek
D(1) Little Hurricane Creek
E(l) Turkey Creek
F(l) Hurricane Creek
G(l) Dry Creek
H(l) Boiling Fork Creek
J(l) Wagner Creek
K(l) Hessey Branch
14,505
240
940
80
175
175
1,245
2,995
2,255
515
3,560
21.7
b.
1inor tributaries and irmnediate
drainage (nonpoint load) —
1,025
c.
Known municipal SIP’s -
3,740
115
1,110
22.9
0.7
6.8
Winchester
Tullahoma
Cowan
Decherd
lotlow State Jr. College
6,705
17,190
2,420
2,395
1,020
5
<0.1
d.
Septic tanks* —
20
e.
Known industrial - None
280
1.6
f
Direct precipitation** —
750
16,360
100.0
Totals
54,650
12,765
A(2)
Elk River
33,785
3,595
Net
annual P accumulation -
20,865
1 .4
100.0

-------
18
Source ________ ______ _______
a. Tributaries (nonpc,int load) -
A(2) Elk River
B(l) Childer Creek
C(1) Gum Creek
0(1) Yellow Branch
E(1) Beans Creek
F(l) Bradley Creek
G(1) Rollins Creek
H(1) Unnamed Creek
b. ‘linor tributaries and Irnediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 137,205
c Known municipal SIP’s -
Arnold Engineering
Development Center
Arnold Village
lionteagle
d Septic tanks* -
e. Known industrial — None
f. Direct precipltation** -
Totals
2. Output - A(l) Elk River
3 let annual N accuntulation —
*Estlnate based on 6 residences, 1 park, and 1 camp for Woods Reservoir
Estimate based on 70 lakeside residences and 1 camp for Tins Ford Reservoir.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
C Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year
1. inputs -
Woods Reservoir
Tims Ford Reservoir
kg N/yr
%of
total
Source
kg H/yr
%of
total
a.
Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
195,045
10,745
11,465
13,345
32,550
131,585
12,285
1,875
33.7
1.9
2 0
2.3
5.6
22.7
2.1
0.3
A(1)
B(l)
C(l)
0(1)
E(l)
F(1)
6(1)
H(l)
J(1)
K(l)
Elk River 350,075
Taylor Creek 8,990
Rock Creek 68,940
Little Hurricane Creek 4,705
Turkey Creek 4,010
Hurricane Creek 8,153
Dry Creek 78,915
Boiling Fork Creek 148,070
Wagner Creek 36,800
Hessey Creek 32,360
37.4
1.0
7 4
o.
0.4
0.9
8.4
15.8
3.9
3 4
23.7
b.
flinor tributaries and imediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 47,880
5.1
c.
Known municipal STP’s -
11,225
340
3,325
1.9
0.1
0.6
‘hnchester 11,300
Tullahoma 75,125
Cowan 4,493
Decherd 7,175
lotlow State Jr. College 3,060
1.2
8.0
0.5
0.8
0.3
170
<0.1
d.
Septic tanks* — 815
0.1
e.
Known industrial - None
17,390
2 9
f
Direct precipitation** - 46,315
4.9
578,550
100.0
Totals 937,175
100.0
463,930
A(2)
Elk River 617,800
114,620
Net
annual N accumulation - 319,375

-------
Tributary
A(2) Elk River
B(l) Childer Creek
C(l) Gum Creek
D(1) Yellow Branch
E(l) Beans Creek
F(l) Bradley Creek
G(l) Rollins Creek
H(l) Unnamed Creek
jç g N/km 2 /yr
860
643
813
1,121
694
1 ,006
694
625
Tributary
A(l) Elk River
B(1) Taylor Creek
C(l) Rock Creek
D(1) Little Hurricane Creek
E(1) Turkey Creek
F(l) Hurricane Creek
G(1) Dry Creek
H(l) Boiling Fork Creek
J(1) Wagner Creek
K(1) Hessey Branch
479
505
630
798
397
840 —
0
1 ,324
544
840
1 ,202
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Woods Reservoir
_________ kg P/km 2 /yr ________
12
20
18
20
18
21
18
15
Tims Ford Reservoir
kg P/km 2 /yr
kg N/km 2 /yr
20
14
9
14
18
18
21
11
52
19

-------
20
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (1975). Essen-
tially, his °eutrophic” loading is that at which the receiving
waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his “oligo-
trophic” loading is that which would result in the receiving
water remaining oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A “nieso-
trophic” loading would be considered one between “eutrophic”
and “01 igotrophic”.
Note that Vollenweider’s model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m 2 /yr)
Woods Tims Ford
Reservoir Reservoir
Estimated loading for 1 .02 1 .27
Vollenweider’s “eutrophic” 0.92 0.81
loading
Vollenweider’s “oligotrophic” 0.46 0.40
loading

-------
21
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Fishel, Stephen H. 1976. Personal Communication. Tennessee
Department of Public Health, Division of Water Quality
Control, Nashville, Tennessee.
Tennessee Department of Public Health. 1975. “Water Quality
Management Plan for the Lower Curnberland River Basin”,
preliminary draft, Division of Water Quality Control,
Nashville, Tennessee.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. I ’Iorking Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-34.

-------
22
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
CONVERSION FWTORS
Hectares x 2.471 acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x l0 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = lbs/square mile

-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
TIUbUTA y FLOW INFOPMATJOM FOR rEMN1s5 .
09/1 3/7
L E CODE: ‘.7 8
WOODS RESERVUIP
TOTAL D AIMAGE OF LAI E(SO M)
f BI.?
TOTAL DRAINAGE AP EA OF LA cE =
SUM OF SUB—DRAINAGE APEAS =
T 1dJ1Ap y
APEA(SQ M)
JAM
FE8
4 s
APP
MAY
JUN
JUL
ADi,
SEi’
OCT
NOV
UtC
4EAN
472M4I
681.2
19.7’.
29.73
27.33
21.38
12.57
6.17
‘728A2
226.9
9.03
I2.2
12.12
9.s
5.6’.
2.07
1.98
3.88
3.3g.
2.9?
‘ ..53
14.16
12.48
4728 1
15.7
0,475
0.705
0.b 3
0.’.’.5
0.258
3.179
0.77
0.87
3.51
6.S1
5.43
‘72 8C1
14.1
(.40?
0.597
0.561
0.377
0.218
0.233
0.1O
0.076
O.Obl
3.178
0.2a9
0.299
472M0 1
11.9
0.340
0.504
0.473
0.317
0.184
0.172
0.092
0.064
0.051
0.151
0.228
0.253
4728E1
238.0
6.80
10.08
9.46
6.37
3.68
2.56
0.145
0.018
0.05.
0.043
0.127
0.192
0.214
4728r1
130.8
3,74
5,55
5.21
3.48
2.03
1.41
2.92
1.56
1.08
0.87
2. S
3.85
4.28
47286 1
17.7
0.504
0.748
2.398
0.470
0.274
0.190
0.86
0.60
0.48
1.40
2.11
2.35
47 2MH1
3.0
0.08’.
0.124
0.399
0.078
0.045
0.116
0.080
0.064
0.189
0.286
0.461
4728ZZ
6.6
0.020
0.029
O.O’7
0.036
0.019
0.013
0.011
0.031
0.048
0.077
MFAM MONTHL FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWSCMS)
TRJhUTA Y MONTM YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
681.2
665.6
FLOW DAY
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
FLOW
162.41
150.96
4728u 1
4
73
19.5s7
15
14.243
5
73
35.96?
16
1.737
6
73
12.516
11
13.675
7
73
10.194
2
5.578
8
73
2.418
7
3.030
9
73
1.322
6
1.099
10
73
3.483
9
4.361
ii
73
22.399
6
36.912
12
73
32.564
7
10.194
1
74
72.774
14
54.935
?
74
35.679
5
42.758
3
74
23.361
8
18.746
4728A2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
6.711
14.130
3.596
1.753
0.510
0.396
0.555
1?.120
14.328
27.496
15.461
9.033
15
16
11
2
7
6
9
6
7
14
5
8
3.879
1.739
5.154
0.566
0.527
0.266
0.317
1.011
3.313
17.245
13.507
19
SUMMAI Y
FLOW DAY
35. 396
16. 480
14. 272
5.975
19
26

-------
1P18uTAi v FLO,, 1NFO- MAT1ON F J TENNESSEtT 09/13/76
LAKE CODE ‘.7 8 OOOS RESERvOI9
N’EAN MONTIiLr FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS(CM5)
Tr JHLJ1ARy MONTP-1 YEA Q MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4 73 0.462 15 0.266
5 73 0.968 16 0.119
6 73 0.246 11 0.354
7 73 0.120 2 0.039
8 73 0.035 7 0.03
9 73 0.027 6 0.0
10 73 0.038 9 3.0
Ii 73 0.830 6 0.0
12 73 0.983 7
1 74 1.886 14 1.181
2 74 1.059 5 0.926 19 0.977
3 76 0.620 8 0.467 26 3.411
6728C 1 73 0.391 15 0.225
5 73 0.818 16 0.101
6 73 0.208 11 0.300
7 73 0.102 2 0.033
8 73 0.029 7 0.031
9 73 0.023 6 0.0
10 73 0.03? 9 0.0
11 73 0.702 6 0.059
12 73 0.833 7 0.193
1 74 1.594 14 1.000
2 74 0.898 S 0.782 19 0.827
3 74 0.524 I 0.394 26 0.345
4728Di 4 73 0.328 15 0.189
5 73 0.691 16 0.085
6 73 0.175 11 0.252
7 73 0.0Sf, 2 0.028
8 73 0.025
9 73 0.019 6 0.0
10 73 0.027 9 0.0
ii 73 0.592 6 0.0
12 73 0.699 7 0.162
1 74 1.342 14 0.841
2 76 0.756 5 0.660 19 0.697
3 74 0.44? 8 0.331 26 0.292
47?AEI 4 73 2.673 15 3.7 4
5 73 13.847 16 1.705
6 73 3.511 11 5.040
7 73 1.716
A 73 0.498 7 0.515
9 73 0.388 6 0.261
10 73 0.544 9 0.309
11 73 11.865 6 0.991
12 73 14.045 7 3.256
1 7’. 26.929 14 lb.877
2 74 15.150 5 13.224 19 13.989
3 74 8.835 8 6.654 26 5.862

-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW 1NFO, MATIOr FOR TENNESSEE 0 /13/7b
LAKE CODE ‘ 7’ WOODS RESERVOIR
MEAN ‘iONT -iLy FLOWS AND UAILY FLOWS(CMS)
T 1t3UTARY MONT-I YEAR MEAN FLOw OAY FlOw DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
472 8FI 4 73 3.625 15 ?.087
5 73 7.617 16 0.937
73 1.931 11 2.775
73 0.943 2 0.306
73 0.275 7 0.?R3
9 73 0.213 6 0.143
10 73 0.300 9 0.170
11 73 6.513 6 0.544
1? 73 7.730 7 1.781
1 74 14.725 14 9.288
2 74 8.375 5 7.277 19 7.674
3 74 4.870 8 3.653 26 3.228
4 73 0.490 15
S 73 1.031 16 0.127
6 73 C.262 11 0.377
7 73 0.128 2 0.041
8 73 0.037 7 0.039
9 73 0.029 6 0.019
10 73 0.040 9 0.023
11 73 0.883 6 0.074
12 73 1.048 7 0.242
I 74 2.008 14 1.260
2 74 1.130 5 0.985 19 1.042
3 74 0.660 8 0.496 2a 0.436
4728 111 4 73 0.08? 15 0.047
5 73 0.172 16 0.021
6 73 0.064 11 0.063
7 73 0.021 2 0.007
8 73 0.006 7 0.007
9 73 0.005 6 0.003
10 73 0.007 9 0.004
11 73 0.147 6 0.012
12 73 0.174 7 0.040
1 74 0.334 14 0.210
2 74 0.188 5 0.164 19 0.173
3 7’. 0.110 8 0.496 26 0.436
4728Z7 4 73 0.146
5 73 0.396
6 73 0.101
7 73 0.049
8 73 0.014
9 73 0.011
10 73 0.016
11 73 0.340
12 73 0.40?
1 74 0.770
2 74 0.433
3 74 0.253

-------
TQI8UTARY FLO#i 1NFOI !MATION FUR TENNESSEE
09/13/76
LAKE CODE 4774
TIMS FORfl RESEPVCTR
TOTAL DRAINAGE Ai EA OF LAKE(SC) KP4)
1363.1
TOTAL DRAINAGE ARLA OF LAl E =
SUM QF SUB—DRAINAGE AREAS =
T 18UrA ?y
C(J -D AINAGE
AQEA(SQ
KM)
JAN FE I MA.
APP
MAY
NORMALIZED
JUN JUL
FLOWS(CMS)
AUG
SEP
ocr
NOV
OEC
MEaN
47244!
472 4A?
4 24BI
47?4C1
472 ’ .01
4724r . !
472 ’ .1 !
47?’4 0 1
4724N1
4724J 1
472 4’cI
47241Z
730.4
1383.1
11.4
106.7
5.9
10.1
9.7
59.6
271.9
43.8
26.9
57.0
20.61 30.87 2a.60
25,82 16.28 17.16
0.39’. 0.552 0.818
2.36 3.31 4.93
.131 0.184 0.274
0.223 0.221 0.462
0.215 0.303 0.447
1.32 1.85 2.75
6.00 8.44 12.54
0,966 1.359 2.019
0.595 0.835 1.243
2.21 3.11 4.62
22.20
8.21
0.597
3.60
0.200
0.337
0.326
2.00
9.15
1.475
0.906
3.37
13.05
10.76
0.419
2.52
0.140
0.2ib
0.229
1.41
6.43
1.034
0.637
2.37
6.51 .5’
8. 1 12.26
O.l?1 0.110
0.72 0.66
0.040 O.u37
0.064 0.062
0.Obb 0.060
0.40 0.37
1.85 1.69
0.297 0.272
0.183 0.168
0.68 0.62
4.Ob
19.11
0.078
0.47
0.026
0.044
0.043
0.26
1.20
0.193
0.119
0.44
3.’.c3
39.08
0.040
0.24
0.013
0.022
0.022
0.13
0.61
0.098
0.060
0.22
3.0’
32.56
0.052
0.31
0.017
0.029
0.029
0.17
0.80
0.128
0.079
0.29
4.87
19.11
0.127
0./6
0.042
0.011
0.069
0.42
1.94
0.311
0.192
0.72
14.67
65.13
0.337
2.03
0.113
0.190
0.185
1.13
5.18
0.833
0. 13
1.91
13.03
22.89
0.303
1.82
0.101
0.164
0.165
1.02
4.63
0.746
0.459
1.71
SUMMARY
MEAN
MONTHLY
FLOWS
AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY
MONTH
YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
4724A1
4724u2
1383.1 TOTAL FLOW IN 291.42
1339.8 TOTAL FLOw OUT = 273.51
FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
4
73
20.416
15
14.725
5
73
37.661
15
6.881
6
73
12.969
11
11.327
7
73
10.421
2
5.663
A
73
2.483
7
3.087
9
73
1.373
7
1.104
10
73
3.568
5
2.R60
11
73
23.956
4
4.587
I
73
3’.263
7
33.414
1
74
76.455
13
7 .721
2
74
37.661
8
33.980
25
26.391
3
74
24.522
8
19.624
29
19.907
4
73
30.016
15
1b.9 0
5
73
26.221
15
21.804
6
73
56.067
Il
90.614
7
73
18.859
2
22.653
8
73
12.459
7
7.561
9
73
9.260
7
15.093
10
73
22.285
5
25.967
11
73
37.661
4
30.299
12
73
69.093
7
90.614
1
7
133.656
13
24P.056
2
74
90.897
8
91.180
25
91.747
3
74
63.167
8
91.747
29
60.315

-------
TPI8UTA Y FLOw INFORMATION FOH TENNESS .t 09/13/76
LAcE CODE 47?4 TINS FORD RESERVOIR
MEAN MONT 1Ly FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TI IbUTAr Y qONTM YEAr MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY LO DAY FLOW
4724t 1 73 0.382 15 14.725
5 73 1.124 15 0.146
6 73 0.158 11 0.213
7 73 0.101 2 0.034
8 73 0.030 7 0.039
9 73 0.029 7 0.020
10 73 0.040 S 0.029
11 73 0.886 4 0.098
I? 73 1.048 7 0.243
1 74 2.010 13 1.971
74 1.130 8 0.920 25 0.640
3 74 0.660 8 0.498 29 0.405
4724C1 4 73 2.302 15 1.705
5 73 6.739 15 0.875
6 73 0.949 11 1.277
7 73 0.606 2 0.204
8 73 0.180 7 0.233
9 73 0.174 7 0.117
10 73 0.244 5 0.176
11 73 5.097 4 0.583
12 73 6.286 7 1.458
1 74 12.063 13 11.836
2 74 6.796 8 5.522 25 3.851
1 74 3.964 8 2.973 29 2.438
4724D1 4 73 0.128 15 0.095
5 73 0.374 15 0.049
6 73 0.053 11 0.071
7 73 0.034 2 0.011
8 73 0.010 7 0.013
9 73 0.010 7 0.007
10 73 0.014 5 0.010
11 73 0.283 4 0.032
12 73 0.351 7 0.081
1 74 0.671 13 0.657
2 74 0.377 8 0.309 25 0.213
3 74 3.221 8 0.166 29 0.136
4724El 4 73 0,314 15 0.161
5 73 0.513 15 0.083
6 73 0.123 11 0.223
7 73 0.059 2 0.008
8 73 0.005 7 0.022
9 73 0.016 7 0.011
10 73 0.023 5 0.017
11 73 0.481 4 0.055
U 73 0.595 7 0.138
1 74 1.161 13 1.116
2 74 0.640 8 0.521 25 0.362
3 74 0.374 8 0.282 29 0.230

-------
TRI8OTARY FLOW 1f FO MATIO’ 1 FOR TENN SSE . 09/13/76
LA(E CODE ‘.7’4 TIMS FORD RESERVOIR
MEAN MONThLY FLOwS AND t)AILY FLQWS(CMS)
TPI8UTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOw DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
472’.F1 4 73 0.269 l 0.155
S 73 3.566 15 0.OPO
6 73 0.0’ . ) 11 0.215
7 73 0.357 2 0.022
8 73 0.057 7 0.021
9 73 0.01 7 0.011
10 73 0.022 5 0.016
11 73 0.464 4 0.053
12 73 0.572 7 0.133
1 74 1.099 13 1.076
2 74 0.617 8 0.504 25 0.348
3 74 0.36 8 0.272 29 0.222
‘+7?4G 1 4 73 2.112 15 0.951
5 73 3.455 15 0.487
6 73 1.002 11 1.218
7 73 0.249 2 0.208
8 73 0.186 7 0.130
9 73 0.097 7 0.065
1(1 73 0.136 5 0.0
11 73 2.83? ‘. 0.326
12 73 3.511 7 0.816
74 6.739 13 6.598
2 74 3.794 8 3.087 25 2.144
3 74 2.214 8 1.468 29 1.362
4724’-IL 4 73 7.532 15 4.332
5 73 15.829 15 2.231
6 73 4.021 11 5.550
7 73 1.504 2 1.354
8 73 1.441 7 0.595
9 73 0.447 7
10 73 0.620 5 0.450
11 73 12.969 4 1.487
12 73 16.056 7 3.710
1 74 30.865 13 30.299
2 74 17.30’ 8 14.102 25 9.769
3 74 10.109 8 7.617 29 6.201
472’J1 4 73 1.212 15 0.699
5 73 2.546 15 0.0
6 73 0.473 11 0.685
7 73 0.275 2 0.134
8 73 0.204 7 0.0
9 73 0.071 7 0.0
10 73 O.IOu S 0.0
11 73 2.087 4 0.0
73 2.585 7 0.600
I 74 4.955 13 4.842
2 74 2.786 8 2.268 25 1.574
3 74 1.628 8 1.226 29 1.000

-------
TRI8UTA Y FLOw IN1Or MAT1O 4 FD rENNESsE
LAKE CODE 47?4 FIMS FO’ i) RESERVOIR
ME.ZN MOhTHLY FL3w’ A D UAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TPIBLJTA Y MOr 4Tr4 YEAr MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW
47 4 I 73 0.954 15 3.430
6 73 1.56( lb
6 73 0.660 11 0.940
7 73 0.247 2 0.074
8 73 0.069 7 0.0
9 73 0.044 7 0.0
10 73 0.061 5 0.0
11 73 1.283 4 0.0
12 73 1.591 7 0.368
1 74 3.058 13 2.973
2 74 1.713 8 1.396 25 0.968
3 74 - 1.002 8 0.753 29 0.614
47241Z 4 73 2.772
5 73 5.833
6 73 1.478
7 73 0.722
8 73 0.208
9 73 0.163
10 73 0.229
11 73 4.986
12 73 5.918
1 74 11.355
2 74 6.371
3 74 3.738

-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STOREF , E1RIEVAL DATt 76/09/10
472801
35 17
r UOD
‘41051
52.0 0ei6 05 46.0 3
RESERvOH
T tN [ SSEt
1 IE.P ALES
0011 FLET
211 12u2
Dt. -’1H CLASS 00
73/05/21 10 20 0000
10 20 0004
10 20 0007
73/08/1 10 20 0000
It) 20 0005
10 20 0015
10 20 0025
10 20 0040
10 20 0056
73/10/23 lb 07 0000
16 07 0001
16 07 0004
0.0 30
0.037
0.026
0.016
0.0 19
0.019
0 • 0 19
0.0 18
0.029
0.017
C) • 029
0.024
0 0 692
DATE
T1 iE
DEPT-’
FR0 4
OF
TO
DAY
FEET
73/05/21
10 20
10 20
10 20
0000
0004
0007
73/08/15
10 20
10 20
10 20
10 20
10 20
10 20
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0056
73/10/23
16 07
16 07
16 07
0000
0001
0004
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
FROM
OF
TO
OAY
FEET
7.2
6.6
7.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
12.6
11.8
COOlO
00300
00077
00O .
004u0
00’.10
0u610
00o25
00630
00671
WATER
DO
T ANS -’
CNDUCTVY
‘ -t
T ALK
r1J—
tot KJEL
NU2 .NO3
-iOS—o1S
TEMP
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
OriTriO
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
MICRL)MhO
SO
Mu/L
Mu/L
M&/L
M /L
MG/L P
19.3
28
215
7.80
7
0.110
0.900
0.750
0.J03
18.7
200
7.10
89
0.120
0.400
0.830
0.004
17.6
220
7.7c
93
0.130
0.400
0.920
0. O Ob
27.6
70
137
8.00
57
0.080
0.800
0.080
0.009
27.’.
137
7.80
sS
0.060
0.500
0.060
0.009
27.3
138
7.5c
56
0.080
0.500
O.06u
0.009
23.6
141
7.10
66
0.260
0.500
0.060
0.01’.
19.5
134
6.90
68
0.400
0.800
0.070
0.008
18.’.
142
7.00
77
0.570
1.100
0.100
0.008
19.8
48
150
9.20
81
0.040
0. ’ .00
0.040
0.004
18.8
150
9.10
88
0.040
0.300
0.040
0.006
19.0
163
8.90
95
0.040
0.200
0.070
0.005
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CPILPPhYL
A
MG/L P UC,/L
13.3
9.0
14.0

-------
ST0P ET ET IEVAL DAtE 76/09/ 10
73/05/21 11 05 0000
11 05 0006
11 05 0015
11 05 0025
73/08/IS 10 50 0000
10 SO 0005
10 50 0015
10 50 0020
73/10/23 15 50 0000
15 50 0005
15 50 0015
15 50 0023
0.011
0.012
0.013
0.014
3.0 is
0 .023
0.023
0.025
0.013
0.013
0.011
0.013
4 7?802
35 17 56.0 086 03 33.0 3
WOO JS E Ekv01
-.7051 T t SE
0406Q2
LLEPALES 2111202
0029 FEET DEPTr, CLASS (
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPT I
OF
DAY FEET
73/05/21 11 05 0000
11 05 0006
11 05 001
11 05 0025
73/08/1 10 50 0000
10 50 0005
10 50 0015
10 50 0020
73/10/23 15 50 0000
15 50 0005
15 50 0015
15 50 0023
30010
00300
00077
00094
00’ .O0
00410
00610
00625
00630
00671
WATER
DO
TRANS
CNDUCT Y
i -ar-i
T ALIS
Nr- 3-N
TOT JEL
N02 O3
PriOS—ulS
TEMP
S CCh1
FIELL)
CACO3
TOIAL
N
N—TOTAL
O Tii0
CENT
MG/L
INCHES
M1C O lPiO
SO
MO/L
MG/L
M&/L
r40/L
MG/L P
20.3
84
170
8.00
64
0.060
0.500
0.540
0.004
20.0
8.4
180
8.00
71
0.050
0.400
0.5’.0
0.002
19.7
7,8
180
7.90
72
0.060
0.400
0.540
0.003
18.9
6.6
200
7.70
81
0.130
0.500
0.640
0.002
28.3
52
141
8.20
60
0.080
0.900
0.080
0.006
27.1
6.8
148
8.00
63
0.080
0.400
0.080
0.009
27.’.
4,4
167
7.50
71
0.180
0.500
0.160
0.008
25.0
4,6
197
7.20
91
0.240
0.600
0.380
0.008
20.6
105
133
8.20
69
0.060
0.300
0.040
0.003
20.2
8,6
133
8.10
70
0.050
0.300
0.050
0.005
20.0
8.2
136
8.00
73
0.U6
0.300
0.060
0.004
18.6
8.2
153
7.80
MI
0.080
0.300
0.100
0.005
DATE
To
TIME DEPTi-i
OF
DAY FEET
00665 32217
PHOS—TOT CHLRPhYL
A
P -IG/L ‘-‘ UG/L
13.6
5.3
1.2

-------
STO ET RETRIEvAL DATE Th/09/iO
47 80J
35 1 59.J 0S 0’. 1C.0 3
*0005 ‘ ESE V0I”
‘.1051 TENNES5E
0 -.0 692
1 IE’ 3 ALLS
004o FEET
211 12 J2
OEPTr-1 CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH PHOS—TOT
OF
DAY FEET
73/05/21 11 30 0000
11 30 0006
11 30 0015
11 30 0025
11 30 0035
11 30 (‘(“.4
73/08/15 11 10 0000
11 10 0005
11 10 0015
11 10 0025
11 10 0035
11 10 00’.4
73/10/23 15 33 0000
15 13 0005
15 33 0015
15 33 0025
15 13 0045
0.0 13
0.012
0.015
(‘.014
(.0i7
0.027
c.01’
0.019
3.016
0.016
.022
0.071
0.014
0.015
0.013
0.015
0.035
32217
CrlLieP.-, YL
A
JG/L
O Ov l O
00300
0 ’077
00096
004C0
00610
00610
00625
00630
00671
DATE
TIME
OE Tri
MATER
DO
Tk ANSP
CNDUCTV’r
I rs
T ALPS
Np-i3—N
TOT ISJEL
NO2 N03
PHOSUIS
FROM
OF
TEP . P
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
O THU
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
4G/L
INCHES
MIC OMHO
Su
M6/L
M /L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
73/05/21
11 30 0000
20.’.
120
160
7.73
6
0.050
0.300
0.540
0. O O2ic
11 30 0006
19.7
P.6
160
7.90
56
0.060
0.200K
0.540
0.002K
11 30 0015
19.6
8.4
145
7.90
55
O.04u
0.200K
0.530
0.002
11 30 0025
19.0
7.2
155
7.70
52
0.040
0.200K
0.530
0.006
II 30 0035
17.9
5.4
IbO
7.60
54
0.060
0.200K
0.530
0.002K
11 30 004’.
17.5
3.6
165
7.50
59
3.120
0.200K
0.490
O.0O.?ic
73/08/15
11 10 0000
28.1
70
136
8.60
59
0.060
0.600
0.050
0.004
11 10 0005
27.9
7.6
136
8.50
59
0.060
0.500
0.090
0.007
Il 10 0015
27.7
7.0
136
8.20
58
0.050
0.400
0.050
0.006
11 10 0025
23.3
0.0
155
7.20
78
0.330
0.600
0.050
0.006
11 10 0035
20.2
0.1
157
7.10
83
0.690
1.000
0.110
0.005
11 10 0044
19.4
0.4
156
7.60
85
0.740
1.300
0.120
0.006
73/10/23
15 33 0000
21.0
84
132
7.80
68
0.080
0.600
0.040
0.005
15 33 0005
21.0
8.2
131
7.80
67
0.060
0.400
0.030
0.00’.
15 33 0015
21.u
7.?
131
7.60
66
0.060
0.300
0.030
0.003
15 33 0025
20.0
6.6
135
7.40
69
0.080
0.300
0.060
0. O OJ
15 11 0045
19.0
6.8
145
7.4)
76
0.090
0.300
0.080
0.006
00665
MG/L P
3.1
7.0
4.5
K VALUE KNOWN 10 bE
LESS TH . N DICATEt1

-------
STORET ETR1EVAL OATL7b/O9/ u
472804
35 18 57.0 086 00 ‘.6.0 3
wOODS - E EPvO1
4 051 r NNEssEt
1 1 I LLS
oo’ u FCET
211 12,j
OcrI-4 CLASS 00
73/05/21 13 30 0000
13 30 0006
13 30 0015
13 30 0030
13 30 0045
13 30 0056
73/08/15 11 50 0000
11 50 0005
11 50 0010
73/10/?3 15 10 0000
15 10 0005
15 10 0015
15 10 0030
IS 10 0055
0.016
0.017
0.015
0.011
0.0 12
0.0 17
0.0’.’.
O .0’7
0.0 1
0.0 3’.
0.0 17
0.013
00010
003 O
0 )077
0O( 4
00400
00 ’ .I
0o610
00625
00630
00b7 1
DATE.
TI t AE flE2T ’-I
ATER
1)0
1RANS ’
CNOUCT dY
‘-r
7 ALr
Nr13—N
7 )7 KJEL
NO2 .NO3
Prl0S— )jS
FROM
OF
Tt .MP
SECCf-11
FIELU
CACO3
TOTAL
N
N-TOTAL
O Trt0
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
‘IG/L
IUCrtES
MjC UMr1O
SO
M(.,/L
Mu/L
M(,/L
Mu/L
MG/L r
73/05/21
13 30
0000
21.’.
8 .
160
a.2
57
0.0 u
0.’.0O
0.490
0.003
13 30
0006
21.1
9.4
150
8.’.0
57
0.020
0.200K
0.490
0.002K
13 30
0015
19..
8.6
150
8.10
56
0.030
0.200K
0.510
0.002K
13 30
0030
18.8
6.4
155
7.80
55
0.050
0.200K
0.520
0.002K
13 30
004
17.7
6,0
150
7.60
55
0. Oo O
0.200K
0.560
0.002K
13 30
0056
17.’.
6.0
155
7.60
56
0.070
0.200
0.540
0.002
73,08/Ic
11 50
0000
2R.0
34
177
8.20
79
0.070
1.000
0.080
0.005
11 50
0005
26.7
7,4
176
8.00
82
0.090
0.500
O.22u
0.00
11 50
0010
23.1
5.3
199
7.7)
97
0.170
0.600
0.660
0.020
73/10/ 3
15 10
0000
20.8
72
130
7.50
70
0.100
0.600
0.050
0.005
15 10
0005
20.7
6.’.
130
7. O
70
0.090
0.400
0.050
0.003
15 10
0015
20.7
6.4
130
7.30
70
0.090
0.300
0.030
0.003
15 10
0030
20.6
5.8
130
7.30
71
0.100
0.400
0.030
0.010
15 10
0055
20.0
1.6
153
7.00
88
0.070
1.100
0.020
0.006
DATE
TIME
D [ PT8
00665
P805—TOT
32217
ChLRP ’YL
FROM
OF
A
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L P
DO/L
7.6
5.1
5. Li
K VALUE J0wN 10 bE
LESS ThAN INDICATEO

-------
STO E1 RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/09/A
I
00.0 086 16 45.0
F0 [ ) ESE O1r
A 1E AL 5
014d FE€.T
211 1 ‘2
Dt PTr1 CLASS 00
4 72’.0
35 1?
riM’s
47 USA
3
0 0b’fl
00010
00300
00077
00094
00400
00410
00510
00625
00530
00671
DATE
TIME
DEPT I
WATER
DO
TRANS
CNDUCTVY
Pp-I
I
ALK
NI-i3—N
TOT KJEL
NOd N(J3
os—o s
FROM
OF
rcMp
SECCHI
FIELD
CACO)
TOTAL
N
N—TOTAL
ORT iO
TO
DAY
FEET
CENT
HG/L
INCHES
M1C 0Mht)
Su
M0/L
M0/L
MG/L
M0/L
M i .,/L P
73/05/21
14 15 OOCO
21.7
90
140
8.83
52
0.060
0.500
0.380
0.005
14 15 000b
20.’.
10.2
135
8.90
51
0.020
0.200
0.320
0.002K
14 15 0015
19.9
10.0
140
8.8
51
0.020
0.200
0.340
0.002K
14 15 0025
17.5
6.8
140
8.00
51
0.040
0.200K
0.420
0.002K
14 15 0040
15.9
6.6
140
l.8u
56
0.030
0.200
0.540
0.002
14 15 0060
13.8
5.2
140
7.70
56
0.040
0.300
0. 62u
0.004
14 15 0080
13.2
6.8
140
7.60
56
0.030
0.200
0.b20
0.010
14 15 0100
11.3
4.8
160
7.50
64
0.030
0.200
0.700
0.013
14 15 0125
9.4
2.4
160
7.40
64
0.030
0.200
0.780
0.016
14 15 0144
9.’.
2.2
170
7.30
64
0.040
0.200
0.760
0.009
73/08/15
13 35 0000
?8.o
108
127
8.40
58
0.060
0.700
0.060
0.005
13 35 COOS
?8.b
7.6
129
8.20
56
0.060
0.600
0.060
0.008
13 35 0020
26.5
2.2
131
7.50
61
0.070
0.500
0.070
0.008
13 35 0035
20.5
0.2
120
7.20
63
0.080
0.400
0.250
0.007
13 35 0050
18.8
0.1
115
7.10
62
0.050
0.200K
0.560
0.012
13 35 0075
16.4
0.5
107
7.00
62
0.050
0.200K
0.610
0.010
13 35 0100
14.0
0.2
110
6.90
74
0.360
0.600
0.460
0.018
13 35 0125
12.2
0.6
145
6. 0
96
0.810
1.200
0.070
0.026
13 35 0140
11.7
0.3
152
6.90
97
1.130
1.600
0.090
73/10/23
11 03 0000
?1.8
168
120
7.2C
58
0.050
0.500
0.03u
0.006
11 03 0010
21.8
5.8
121
7. 20
59
0.040
0.200K
0.020
0.007
11 03 0030
21.6
5.8
120
7.30
59
0.030
0.200K
0.020
0.00 7
11 3 C0’.0
21.5
1.0
12C
7.00
60
0.040
0.200
0.020
0.014
11 03 0050
19.6
3.5
11
O. 9 v
61
0.030
0.200K
0.050
0.011
11 03 0090
17.1
3•4
126
6.80
71
0.070
0.200
0.170
0.018
ii 03 0130
13.8
0.2
1 6
6.80
1v9
2.000
2.300
K VI LIJE ‘ NOW J T ) 8E
LESS 1r1t N 1 OICMFE0

-------
STORET ET IEVAL DATE 7b/09/1u
‘.72’.0 I
- 12
TIM’S
-. 7051
1 IEr’ALES
0I4e FEET
21112 2
Dc. 1 CLASS 00
73/05/21 14 15 0000
14 15 0006
1’. 15 0015
14 15 0025
14 15 0040
14 15 u060
14 15 0080
14 IS 0100
14 15 0125
14 IS 0144
73/08/15 13 35 0000
13 35 0005
13 35 0020
13 35 0035
13 35 0050
13 35 0075
13 35 0100
13 35 0125
13 35 014u
73/10/23 11 03 0000
11 03 0010
11 03 0030
11 03 0040
11 03 0050
11 03 0090
11 03 0130
0u66 32217
PrIOS-TOT CrtLRPI-iiL
MG/L P U0/L
C .017
(i .017
0.011
0.0 10
0.012
0.01 3
0.020
0.018
(s,01
0.017
0.017
.016
C .0114
0.012
(.012
0.029
.055
0.100
0.023
u.014
0.014
0.0?0
0.014
0.023
o • 396
DATE
FROM
ID
TiME OEPTH
OF
OAY FEET
00.0 G’36 lb 4 .U 3
FOr t) cESEr 01P
1t NES 5 E
A
040b91
6.0
b•0
2. 1

-------
STORET RETRIFVAL DATE 76/09/10
‘.72402
35 13 15.0 086 16 J5.0 3
TIM’S FOrW SE v0L ’
41051 FENNESSE
040691
u1EPALE 2111202
0102 FEET D PT,-4 CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 0C0’ 4 00400 00410 00610 00625 00b30 00071
DATI TIME DEPT -1 WATER DC ’ T ANSP CNDUCTVY I ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2bNO3 PhOS-ols
FROM OF TEMP SECCI-il FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOIAL D TMO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L LNCr1ES MICROMMO SO Mu/L MulL MG/L M(,/L MG/L p
73/OS/2! 15 00 0000 21.3 78 14C, 8.90 49 (i.O30 0.200 0.330 0.002K
15 00 0006 20.0 9.6 140 8. ) ,1 0.020 0.300 0.310 0.003
15 00 (‘015 19.0 7.0 140 7.9Cs 52 0.040 0.300 0.360 0.004
15 00 0025 18.0 7.8 140 7.80 51 0.040 0.300 0.410 0.007
15 00 0040 1S.’ .2 150 7.70 53 0.020 0.200 0.560 0.002
15 00 u05S 14.2 6.2 145 7.60 52 0.020 0.200< 0.S 0 0.005
15 00 0070 13.6 4.4 150 7.50 55 0.020 0.200K 0.610 0.010
15 00 0085 13.1 3.2 150 7.40 57 0.030 0.200K 0.620 0.014
15 o0 0098 11.9 1.0 190 7.33 79 0.530 0.600 0.170 0.019
73/08/15 14 10 0000 28.8 90 129 b.30 53 0.0 0 0.500 0.060 0.005
14 tO 0005 28.6 8.0 129 8.2w 49 0.060 0.300 0.060 0.011
14 10 0020 25.7 0.? 131 7.40 0.050 0.200 0.0 0 0.009
14 10 0035 20.1 0.2 117 7.20 55 0.010 0.200 0.240 0.009
14 10 0050 19.0 0.1 115 7.1J 57 0.070 0.200K 0.500 0.009
14 10 0075 16.6 1.2 109 7.00 59 0.050 0.200’( 0.600 0.011
14 10 0100 14.5 0.1 112 6.90 78 0.530 0.500 0.290 0.030
14 10 0125 I?.3 0.1 149 6.80 ‘ S 1.000 1.500 0.100 0.014
14 10 0134 11.8 0.2 164 6.90 105 1.4 50 2.000 0.100 0. OOb
73/10/23 10 12 0000 21.9 144 121 7.30 50 0.030 0.300 0.040 0.012
10 12 0010 21.9 6.2 121 7.30 49 0.020 0.200K 0.020 0.008
10 12 0025 21.9 6.0 122 7.3u 49 0.020 0.200K 0.020 0.008
10 I? 0040 21.6 3.8 121 7.00 57 O.03’J 0.200K 0.020 0.009
10 12 0050 19.5 0.4 120 6. 0 0. ObO U.200r< U.fjbO 0.0 12
10 12 0080 17.6 u. ’ . 122 6.80 6’. 0.0 0 0.200K 0.130 0.018
10 12 0120 1’i.5 3.1 6.80 103 1.700 2.000 0.030 0.010
10 I? 0134 13.3 0.2 222 6.80 124 2.420 2.900 0.020 0.010
K VALUE KNOAN TO BE
LESS TkAN INOIC4TEO

-------
STO T RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
‘472’4 02
35 13 15.0 Ua6 lb 35.0 3
TjM’5 FO O E5E’)1
‘.7 1 TtNr .
0’.0691
1 1E ALES
0102 FEEl
211 12u2
E Tr CLASS 00
00665 32217
DEPTi-I PHOS—TOT CdL PHYL
A
MG/L P tJG/L
73/05/21 15 00 0000
15 00 0006
15 00 0015
15 00 0025
15 00 0040
15 00 0055
15 00 0070
15 00 0085
15 00 0098
73/08/15 14 10 0000
14 10 0005
14 10 0020
14 10 0035
14 10 0050
14 10 0075
14 10 0100
14 10 0125
14 10 0134
73/10/23 10 12 0000
10 12 0010
10 1? 0025
10 12 0040
10 12 0050
10 12 0080
10 12 0120
10 1- 0134
0.018
0.018
0.019
0.012
0.011
0.01
0.026
0.027
0.046
0.017
0.021
0.018
0.018
0.013
0.0 1’4
0.0 35
0 • 106
0.155
0.018
0.018
0.016
0.016
0.017
0.02b
0.391
0 • 796
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME
OF
OAT FEET
6.3
7.5
2.4

-------
STOR T ETPIEVAL DATE 7o/G /10
472403
35 12 10.0 086 1’. 3 i.0 3
T1’i’ FOku ME5Ek O1
“7051 T Ni E SEE
0 ‘0 89 1
11E ALES 2111202
0115 FEEl IkPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00530 00571
OATL TIME OEPTI-4 4TER DO TR NSP CNOUCTVY T ALK NH3—N TOT KJEL NO2 .NO3 PhOS—OIS
F 0M OF TEM ’ SECCNI FIELO CACQJ TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTiiO
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHLS MIC OM,10 SU MG/L MG/L MG/L M6/L MU/L P
73/05/21 15 45 0000 22.1 90 135 8. so 49 0.080 0.700 0.41u 0.00’.
15 ‘.5 0006 20.2 1°.4 130 i.80 48 0.040 0.500 0.38u 0.030
15 ‘.5 0015 19.7 6.2 135 8.00 47 0.040 0.400 0.470 0.003
15 45 0030 16.6 6.4 135 7.70 48 0.030 0.300 0.550 0.004
15 45 0045 15.4 6.8 135 7.60 45 0.040 0.200 0.630 0.011
15 45 0060 13.8 6.0 135 7.60 ‘.5 0.020 0.300 O.64v 0.011
15 45 0075 13.3 5.4 135 7.4Q 46 0.020 0.200 0.630 0.014
15 45 0090 12.s 4.8 140 7.30 49 0.040 0.300 0.650 0.015
15 45 0111 10.4 0.8 190 7.20 78 0.400 0.500 0.320 0.015
73/08/15 15 00 0000 29.5 108 130 8.10 55 0.070 0.400 0.060 0.00’.
15 00 0005 29.2 7.6 130 8.00 52 0.060 0.200 0.040 0.009
15 00 0020 26.0 2.4 128 7.20 56 0.060 0.200 0.060 0.010
15 00 0035 20.’. 0.1 116 7.00 57 0.080 0.200K 0.240 0.009
15 00 0050 18.9 0.1 122 6.90 b3 0.070 0.200K 0.560 0.011
15 00 0075 16.5 0.2 123 6.8U 66 0.050 0.200K 0.680 0.011
15 00 0109 13.7 0.4 167 6.70 1u6 1.240 1.600 0.120 0.019
73/10/23 1.1 34 0000 22.0 169 121 7.3 ) 61 0.040 0.400 0.030 0.007
11 34 0010 21.9 6.4 121 7.30 61 0.040 0.200 0.020 0.008
11 36 0030 21.7 ‘ ..6 123 7.10 62 0.030 0.200 0.020 0.009
11 ‘ . 0045 19.9 0.6 123 6.80 65 0.030 0.200 0.030 0.010
11 34 0075 17.6 0.8 148 6.70 83 0.130 0.300 0.240 0.027
11 34 0115 14.9 0.4 212 6.80 113 2.280 2.800 0.040 0.013
K V LUE KI’IO 1 TO 8
LESS TH, N INDICATEO

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7 /G’ ,10
‘ .72’.03
35 12 10.0 0 6 14 jS.0 3
TIr i’ FOi ) (EScR (U1R
7O51 T NNLSSEE
040R91
1 1L ALES
3115 F CI
2111202
DE-’Tri CLASS 00
73/05/21 15 45 0000
15 45 0006
15 aS JOiS
15 45 0030
15 45 0045
15 as 0060
15 45 0075
iS 45 0090
15 45 0111
73/08/15 15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0020
15 00 0035
iS 00 0050
15 00 0075
15 00 0109
73/10/23 11 34 0000
11 3’. 0010
11 3’. 0030
11 34 0045
11 34 0075
11 34 0115
00665 32217
P 10S-TQT CHLPPr1YL
A
MG,L P UG/L
0.019
0.0 19
0.021
0.0 14
0.016
0.052
0.029
0.051
0.043
0.017
0.0 19
0.019
).0 16
0.015
0.021
0.167
0.0 29
.j.015
0.015
0.018
C.039
0.485
DATE
FROM
To
TJ’4E OEPT’-i
OF
DA FEET
10.0
7.2
2.2

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/10
4 p2404
3 lb 15.0 0 15 15.0 3
1114’S FO,41) P ESER’ Oik
‘.7051 TENNESSEE
040 b92
1 1E-’ALES
0074 FEET DEPT.-’
2111202
CLASS 00
73/05/2? 0 00 0300
10 00 0006
10 00 0015
10 00 0030
10 00 0045
10 00 0057
10 00 0071)
73/08/15 15 35 0000
15 35 0005
15 35 0020
15 35 0048
15 35 0065
73/13/23 12 03 0000
12 03 0010
12 03 0025
12 03 0045
12 03 0059
0.022
0.027
0.0 24
0.022
0.023
0.029
C .0’.a
3.024
0.021
0.020
0.016
3.113
0.032
0.019
(..0 ie
3.020
0 • 047
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME OEPT
OF
DAY FEET
O0’i00 00410
I’rI I ALK
CACO3
SU MG/L
03010
WATER
TEJ P
CE ‘IT
20 •
19.9
19.3
17.1
15.1
14. ?
13.6
29.3
29. 1
26.1
19.7
17.5
21.7
21 • 7
21.6
21 • 3
18.7
73/35/22 10 00 0000
10 00 0006
10 00 0015
10 00 0030
10 00 0045
10 00 0057
10 00 0070
73/08/15 15 35 0000
15 35 0005
15 35 0020
15 35 0048
15 35 OOaS
73/10/23 12 03 0000
12 03 0010
12 03 0025
12 03 0045
12 03 0059
00 10
TOTAL
00300 00077
00 TRANSP
SE CCM I
MG/L 1 ’ CrIES
72
10.2
7.2
5.8
5.0
4.2
3.8
100
1.8
1.0
0.1
0.6
120
6.4
6.6
6.0
2.8
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
ML C 0t -4H0
135
130
130
135
125
130
140
129
129
130
114
126
120
120
120
120
131
8.50
8. 70
e .00
7.8
7.70
7.60
7.50
8.20
8.00
7.20
7.00
6.90
7.20
7.20
7.20
7.20
7 • 2)
00625
TOT IcJEL
N
Mb/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.200
0. 1.00
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0 • 700
0.500
0.200
0.20 OK
0.200K
0.700
55 0.060
53 0.040
0.040
53 0.040
49 0.030
51 0.030
51 0.040
56 0.070
57 0.060
0.060
61 0.110
71 0.M90
62 0.040
62 0.040
60 0.030
57 0.030
0.553
DATE
FROM
TO
00630
NO2 NO3
N—TOTAL
MGI L
0.330
0 • 330
0.360
0.490
0.570
0.590
0.590
0.060
0 • 060
0.060
0.210
0.070
0.030
0.020
0.020
0 • 020
0.030
TIME OEPTH
OF
L)AY FEET
00671
P .-iOS—.JIS
ORT lO
MG/L P
(i.00 5
0.00 K
0.005
0.012
0.011
0.0 16
0.018
0.005
8.007
0.007
0.009
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.009
0.0 16
00665 32217
PHOS-TOT CI-ILRPHYL
A
MG/L P UG/L
5.8
8.1
3.9
K VALUE KNOWN 10 BE
LESS T.-i N IN ICATEt$.

-------
STORET -ETP1EVAL UATF 7b/b9/IO
‘.72405
35 12 45.0 086 09 20.0 3
TIM’S FOF ) RESEP U [ P”
‘47051 IEN .1 SEL
040891
1 1EPALES 2111202
0078 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 0 0 4 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE T1 DEPTrI ATER 00 TRt -NS ’ CINDUCTVY p r1 I ALIS Ni-li-N tOT r JEL NO2 O3 Pt-iOS—DIS
FROM OF TEMP SECCMI FIELD CACO3 TOTAL N N—TOTAL ORIrID
To DAY FEET CENT MG/L INCHES MICROMMO SLI MG/ i. Mb/I MG/L Mb/L M&/L P
73/05/22 10 45 0000 21.3 96 160 8.50 70 0.030 0.300 0. ’+o0 0.002
10 45 0006 20.9 9.6 ISi) 8.50 63 0.030 0.200 0.430 0.007
10 ‘.5 0015 20.1 5.. 225 7.8u 6 , 0.0’.0 0.200 0.460 0.006
10 4S 0030 17.2 5.0 175 7.70 95 0.050 0.200 0.850 0.008
10 45 0045 15.1 3.6 150 7.60 71 0.0 ’.0 0.200 0.770 0.029
10 45 0060 13.6 2.2 155 7. 0 59 0.160 0.300 0.810 0.167
10 45 0074 13.4 1.0 160 7.50 63 0.300 0.500 0.620 0.087
73/08/15 16 10 0000 29.2 90 134 8.30 60 0.060 0.400 0.050 0.00’.
16 10 ooos 28.7 7.6 133 8.20 62 0.050 0.200 0.053 0. O ls
16 10 0020 26.9 1.6 145 7.20 104 0.120 0.200 0.510 0.009
16 10 0040 20.2 0.2 193 7.00 105 0.170 0.300 0. 90 0.011
16 10 0064 17.8 0.8 194 6.90 115 0.670 0.800 0.160 0.022
73/10/23 12 24 0000 21.9 136 7.50 8 0.040 0.300 0.040 0.007
12 24 0010 21.6 7.4 135 7.50 58 0.040 0.200K 0.030 0.007
12 ?4 0020 21.5 7.0 134 7.50 63 0.040 0.200K 0,033 0.00’.
12 ?4 0040 20.8 4.8 137 7.10 65 0.100 0.400 0.070 0.004
12 2’. 0058 19.3 2.6 140 7.00 71 0.340 0.700 u.120 0.005
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH Pi -iOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO i)AY FEET MG/L i-’ IJG/L
73/05/22 10 45 0000 3.016 5.3
10 45 0006 0.023
10 45 0015 0.026
10 45 0030 0.028
10 45 O0’.5 0.121
10 45 0060 0.205
10 45 u07’. 0.165
73/08/15 16 tO 0000 0.090 7.5
16 10 0005 0.016
16 10 0020 0.018
16 10 0040 0.015
16 10 0064 0.018
73/10/23 12 2’. 0000 0.017 6.0
12 24 0010 0.021
12 24 0020 0.022
12 24 0040 0.022
12 24 0056 3.035
K MLUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET ‘RETRIEVAL DATE 7 /09/10
472406
35 12 10.0 086 07 25.0 3
TIM’S FOP D ESERVO1W
‘.7351 rENNE5SEL
040692
11EPALE 21112o2
0030 FEET O PTH CLASS 00
00010 00300 00077 00094 00400 Oo ’. 1c 00610 00625 00630 00671
DATE T1’4F DEPT-i WATER 00 TRA SP CNDIICTVY PH 1 ALK . iH3N TOT JEL O2&NO3 Pi-IOS—UIS
FROM OF IEMP SECCHI FIELt) CACO3 IOIAL N —TOTAL ORTrtO
TO DAY FEET CENT WG/L INCHES rI ICPOMHO SU MG/L M(,/L M(.,/L MG/L MG/L P
73/05/22 11 20 0000 21.8 60 205 8.60 fl 0.160 0.300 0.570 0.010
11 20 0006 21.4 10.4 190 8.70 92 0.030 0.200 0.500 0.007
11 20 0015 20.0 8.0 215 8.00 98 0.0’.0 0.200 0.bl O 0.009
11 20 0026 17.2 5.0 260 7.80 126 0.080 0.200 0.940 0.006
73/08/15 16 25 0000 28.4 72 142 8.50 70 0.070 0.300 0.060 0.008
16 ?S 0005 28.3 7.4 143 8.40 72 0.050 0.200 0.060 0.008
16 25 0015 28.2 7.0 143 7.8 63 0.070 0.300 0.060 0.007
16 25 0025 24.3 5.0 195 7.40 96 0.100 0.400 0.’.50 0.020
73/10/23 12 52 0000 21.0 70 138 7.70 65 0.040 0.500 0.030 0.004
12 52 0005 20.9 8.8 139 8.00 67 0.030 0.400 0.020 0.004
12 52 0015 20.8 8.4 137 7.80 70 0.030 0.300 0.020 0.004
12 5 0025 20.2 7•4 169 7•5 1) 87 0.050 0.300 0.180 0.005
12 52 0029 18.3 213
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PP-lOS-TOT CrILRPI-IYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/22 11 20 0000 0.030 14.6
11 20 006 0.028
11 20 0015 0.028
ii ?0 0026 0.048
73/08/15 16 25 0000 0.048 10.1
16 25 0005 0.023
16 ‘5 0015 0.026
16 25 0025 0.051
73/13/23 12 52 0000 0.026 8.3
12 52 0005 0.037
12 5? 0015 0.028
12 52 0025 0.041

-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
STOREr RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
0.540
0.540
o .630
0.380
0.029
0.042
0.220
0.037
0.240
0.540
0.60 0
0.630
0.650
0.680
1.900
o • 1 80
0.970
1.540
o • 600
0.6 0
1.450
0.400
0.600
1.200
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.069
0.026
0.083
0.079
0.080
0 • 182
0.730
0.055
0.0 36
0 • 100
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.020
00630
00625
00610
0671
00665
OATE
TIME
DEPTrs
NO2 N03
TOT KJEL
NH3—N
PrIOS—DIS
PHOS—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
URTHO
To
DAY
FEET
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
I G/L P
MG/L P
4728A1
35 17 57.0 086 05 ‘.7.0 4
ELrc PIvER
47 1.5 CAPITOL HILL
u/ OOOS RES 040692
ELK RIvER 0A14 OR BANK JUST BELO DAM
11EPALES 2111204
OOCO FEET DEPT -s CLASS 00
73/04/15 08 45
73/05/16 09 30
73/06/11 12 45
73/07/0 08 40
73/08/07 13 45
73/09/06 09 40
73/10/09 09 25
73/11/06 09 35
73/12/08 14 05
74/01/14 09 25
74/02/05 09 30
74/02/19 09 25
74/03/08 13 30
74/03/26 09 15
0.011 0.045
0.005K 0.010
0.023 0.045
0.015 0.030
0.019 0.030
0.005K 0.020
0.017 0.017
0.005 0.025
0.016 0.0 0
0.020 0.070
0.015 0.035
0.015 0.025
0.030
0.010 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN 10 BE
LtSS TI-êAN IND1C. TEt)

-------
STOPET ‘RETRIEVAL DATE 76/0 /o9
4728A2
3i 18 26.0 08 56 34.0 4
ILK 1VE’
47 7.5 ALTO
I/wOODS RES 0’e0691
SEC. I (u O(., AT r uTLLLjGE FO I)
L 1EPALES 21112o .
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00b30 00625 0 61O 0C67 1 00685
DATE TIHE DEDTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL Nh3-N PriOS—DIS ‘-‘r OS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L P40/L MG/I MG/L P MG/I P
73/04/15 09 5’. 0.670 1.320 0.022 0.005K 0.022
73/05/16 10 35 0.720 0.100K 0.011 0.005K 0.010
73/06/11 13 ?5 0.870 0.540 0.022 0.008 0.025
73/01/02 09 35 1.420 0.260 0.024 0.010 0.015
73/08/07 15 05 0.890 0.260 0.084 0.008 0.025
73/09/06 10 25 0.860 0.500 0.100 0.005K 0.020
73/10/09 10 10 0.660 0.700 0.072 0.012 0.020
73/11/06 10 35 0.470 0.250 0.012 0.006 0.02,
73/12/07 14 60 1.100 2.600 0.310 0.008 0.035
74/01/14 10 05 0.810 0.100 0.020 0.010 0.025
74/02/05 10 17 (p.620 0.1 00K 0.015 0.005 0.015
74/02/19 10 3 0.650 0.200 0.015 0.010 0.035
74/03/Od 14 05 0.600 0.400 0.025 0.010 0.035
74/03/?( 10 00 0.720 0.200 0.020 0.005 0.015
K VMLUE K OwN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DAlE 76/09/09
CAI ’ITOL PULL
0406’ 2
OF (,UM C .25 N CAPITOL HILL
2111204
DEPT i CLASS 00
4728 1
35 17 30.0 086 01 J?.0 4
CrIILDER RIVER
‘.7 7.5
T/ O0OS P ES
DG 1 MI
IIEPALES
00)0 FEET
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
0EPTr
N02€ .N03
TOT I
-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE Th/09/09
4728C1
35 17 40.0 086 00 dIJ.0 ‘4
GUM Cr EEK
41 1.5 CAPIrOL i-IILL
T/ OOOS ES 040o92
GUM CR RU ISR06 JUST NE OF GUM CR
1)E LES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630
006?S
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
DEPTH
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
NN3-N
PHOS-DIS
P 0S—TOT
FROM
OF
N—TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTI-40
TO
DAY
FEET
HG/I
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L
73/04/15
09 15
0.470
1.300
0.023
0.005K
0.030
73/05/16
10 20
0.580
1.300
0.056
0.012
0.030
73/06/11
13 10
0.800
1.300
0.030
0.010
0.020
73/07/02
09 25
0.540
0.035
0.014
0.035
73/08/07
14 50
0.420
0.280
0.050
C.0 08
0.03
73/11/06
10 20
3.105
0.400
0.023
0.006
0.030
73/12/07
14 25
0.740
1.600
0.490
0.012
0.025
74/01/14
09 50
0.840
1.500
0.044
0.010
0.030
74/02/05
10 00
0.630
0.400
0.055
0.005
0.020
7’./02/1’
10 10
0.520
0.300
0.015
0.010
0.O’+ 5
74/03/08
1350
0.430
0.700
0.025
).010
0.045
74/03/26
09 50
0.616
0.200
(.015
0.010
0.015
Pc VL LUE IcNOWN [ 0 BE
LESS Ti-IAN INDICMTEO

-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
472801
35 17 42.0 085 57 44.0 4
YELLOW ANCi-4
47 7.5 ALTO
T/w000S RES 0 ’ .06 I
SEC RI) 8. OG NEAR S 1AKE RAG SCHOOL
11 PALES 2L112O .
0000 FEET OE TH CLASS 00
0C630 00625 00610 03671 0 06o5
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nr1 —N PriOS—015 PPIOS—TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L 146/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 09 19 1.440 0.540 0.0 10 0.305r( 0.030
73/05/16 10 30 0.750 0.600 0.075 0.010 0.045
73/06/H 13 15 1.780 1.050 0.017 0.007 0.015
73/07/02 09 30 0.115 0.840 0.027 0.010 0.065
73/12/07 14 30 2.160 1.000 0.136 0.012 0.015
74/01/1’. 09 57 1.510 0.600 0.048 0.015 0.030
74/02/05 10 10 1.400 0.300 0.040 0.007 0.015
7 ’ ./02/19 10 15 0.950 0.800 0.040 0.015 0.060
74/03/08 14 00 1.300 0.600 0.035 0.010 0.045
74/03/26 09 55 1.600 0.300 0.125 0.013 0.015
is V, LUE KNOwr e TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATEs)

-------
STORET P ET* IEVAL DATE 76/00/09
4728E1
35 20 33.0 085 51 33.0 4
EANS CREEi’
47 7.5 ALTO
T/WOODS ES 040691
SEC RD 8 OG .5 E OF PRAIWIE PLANS
I1EPALES 211120 ’.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 0 )610 00671 0066
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?6N03 TOT KJEL NM3-N PhOS—DIS PHOS-TOT
FROII OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/04/15 09 45 0.990 0.021 0.005K 0.015
73/05/lb 10 45 1.140 0.040 0.007 0.010
73/06/11 1.500 0.100K 0.010 0.008 0.010
73/08/07 15 20 1.400 0.190 0.033 0.007 0.020
73/09/06 tO 35 0.580 0.480 0.110 0.006 0.015
73/10/09 10 20 0.710 0.700 0.054 0.014 0.015
73/11/06 10 45 3.520 0.150 0.011 0.005K 0.020
73/12/07 14 50 1.700 0.100K 0.020 (v.008 0.010
74/01/1’. 10 15 1.360 0.300 0.028 0.010 0.025
7 ’ ./02/05 10 30 0.970 0.100K 0.010 0.005K 0.010
74/02/19 10 30 1.060 0.200 3.020 0.007 0.020
74/03/08 14 15 0.800 0.200 0.015 0.005K 0.020
74/03/26 10 15 1.180 0.100K 0.030 0.010 0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
‘.728F1
35 20 07.0 085 59 26.0 ‘.
BRADLE C EEK
47 7.5 ALTO
T/w000S ES 04 0a1
SEL R i) BPWG 1.2 P41 WS PRAIRIE PLAINS Sc
I 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET OEPT’-i CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
NO2 NO3
TOT KJEL
Ni-$3—N
PHOSOIS
PHOS-TOT
N—TOTAL
MG/L
N
MG/L
TOTAL
HG/L
ORTHO
MG/L P
MG/L P
DATE
FR OH
TO
73/04/15
73/05/16
73/06/11
7 3/0 7/02
73/08/07
73/0 9/0 6
73/10/09
73/11/06
73/12/0 7
74/01/14
74/02/05
74/02/19
74/0 3/0 8
74/03/26
TIME DEPTr
OF
DAY FEET
09 55
10 53
13 40
09 45
09 Sc
15 ?5
10 50
10 30
10 55
14 55
10 ?7
10 40
10 40
14 ?O
10 25
1.420
1 .500
1.840
1.840
1.620
1.360
0.820
0.710
0.680
2.000
1.680
1.440
1.360
1.340
1.600
0.440
0.100K
0.4 80
0.380
1 • 100
0.100K
0.4 60
0.450
0.100K
0.700
0.100
0. 100K
0.150
0.300
0.150
0.013
0.011
0.012
0.022
C.012
0.0 26
0.110
0.054
0.011
0.104
0.016
0.010
0.010
0.025
0.020
0 .0 18
0.014
0.012
0.010
0.0 12
0.034
0.011
0.061
o • 102
0.0 16
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.055
0.0 20
0.0 25
0.0 20
0.0 20
0.0 45
0.0 20
0.0 75
0.122
0.045
0.030
0.017
0.030
0.030
0.0 12
c VALUE I J0WN TO 3E
LESS T -i N INDICATED

-------
S1O ET ETRIEVAL DATE 7 /09/09
4 728G1
3 20 10.0 086 06 40.0 4
P OLL INS C’ [ EK
47 7.5 CAPITOL MILL
1/wOODS RrS 040692
SEC RD BROG IN AEDLR PE M1SS1ON IN Ai)VAN
I 1EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET OEPTM CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPT l NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nrf3—N PiiOS-D1S PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET HG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 09 20 0.220 1.980 4.042 0.010 0.055
73/05/16 00 13 0.550 0.140 0.0 15
73/06/11 14 00 0.580 1.080 0.056 0.02! 0.060
73/07/02 08 30 0.460 0.220 0.014 0.020 0.050
73/08/07 13 ?5 0.138 1.500 0.630 0.007 0.025
73/09/06 09 ?5 O.07 0.735 0.090 0.005r 0.030
73/10/09 09 10 0.050 1.450 0.280 0.014 0.040
73/11/06 09 20 0.0d4 0.250 0.031 0.031 0.040
73/12/07 13 50 0.310 0.200 0.028 0.020 0.050
74/01/14 09 I I 0.325 0.500 0.066 0.020 0.055
74/02/05 09 15 0.560 3.000 0.360 0.015 0.020
74/02/1 09 10 0.610 0.200 0.025 0.015 0.040
74/03/08 13 15 0.640 0.200 0.020 0.015 0.030
74/03/26 09 00 0.540 0.300 0.020 0.025 0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STO ET I ET 1EvAL DATE 76/09/09
472441
3 15 30.0 086 07 16.0
ELc frc1vE’
‘7 7.5 CAPIEOL hILL
1/TIMS FUNO RES 040612
US rIWY 41—A BROG JUST SE OF E.STILL SPMS
11c?.4LES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 0062 5 03610 0fl671 00665
OATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL N- 3—N PHOS—DIS PhOS—TOT
FROPi OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTHO
TO DAY FEET r4G/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/0 ./15 13 ‘55 0.500 0.380 (.013 0.008 0.030
73/05/15 14 40 0.420 0.290 0.005K 0.005K 0.015
73/06/11 11 30 ( ‘.105 1.R90 0.011 0.014 0.020
73/07/02 11 ( 0 0.050 0.400 0.013 0.016 0.030
73/08/07 12 06 0.010 0.440 0.( h18 0.005K 0.030
73/09/07 I I 45 0.010K 0.S’.0 0.012 0.005K 0.025
73/ 10/OS 11 35 0.010K 0.300 0.010 0.005K 0.057
73/11/04 11 00 0.080 0.900 0.044 0.009 0.045
73/12/07 11 10 0.260 1.100 0.100 0.016 0.030
7 /01/13 15 05 0.460 0.300 0.026 0.026 0.065
74/02/08 11 ?c ( .580 0.100K 0.025 0.010 0.035
74/02/25 15 30 (.610 0.200 3.015 0.010 0.035
74/03/08 11 55 0.640 0.’.00 0.055 0.010 0.030
74/03/29 11 25 0.630 0.200 0.030 0.025 0.025
K VALUE IcNLJWN TO bE
LESS THAN INDJCMTEO

-------
STORET ETPIEVAL DATE: 76/09/09
472442
35 11 31.0 0 6 16 50.0 4
ELt< RIVER
47 7.5 LOIS
0/TIMS FORt) RE 0 0691
TN FlAY SO dRUG .S M r .w OF HARMONY
1IEPALES 11120 4
0000 FEtT DEPTrI CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTh NO NO3 TOT t(JEL NH3—N r40S—OIS PHOSTOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OPTrIO
TO DAY FEET M(.,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L
73/c”,/iS 12 55 0.460 1.100 0.033 0.009 0.025
73/OS/IS 13 45 0. .S0 0.950 0.012 0.015 0.020
73/06/11 10 05 0.520 0.900 0.022 0.012 3.(.15
73/07/02 09 35 0.210 0.290 0.020 0.022 0.030
73/08/07 10 fO 0.072 0.500 0.270 0.020 0.045
73/09/07 10 45 0.092 0.570 0.260 0.020 0.060
73/10/05 10 15 0.071 1.100 0.640 3.018 0.135
73/11/04 10 00 0.089 0.450 0.160 0.026 0.080
73/12/07 10 10 0.168 0.500 0.068 0.008
74/01/13 14 15 0.300 0.200 0.016 0.032 0.060
74/02/OA 10 30 0.460 0.100 0.015 0.010 0.030
74/02/25 13 45 0.510 0.300 0.015 0.015 0.040
74/03/08 10 55 0.530 0.’.O0 0.040 0.010 0.030
74/03/?9 10 00 0.570 0.200 0.015 0.015 0.020

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7e/09/09
472 4d1
35 15 47.0 086 Ob 14.0 4
TAYLOR C EE’
47 7.5 r JLLA- oMA
T/TIMS Fu 4o RES 0406 2
EAsTt OOK R dkDG AT SE EDGE [ STILL SPkS
11EPAL S 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
C3630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DCPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL N’13-N ‘P1OS—OIS PHOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL OMTH O
TO DAY FEET PIG/L MG/L MC’/L MG/L ? MG/L
73/O /15 14 00 0.273 1.890 0.036 0.005K 0.035
73/05/15 14 45 0.252 1.980 0.050 0.005K 0.025
73/06/l I 12 00 0.110 0.940 0.008 0.008 0.025
73/07/02 11 15 0.054 1.400 0.020 0.010 0.025
73/08/07 11 20 0.010K 0.380 0.026 0.006 0.030
73/0 /O7 11 55 0.010 ’ s 0.6’O 3.021 0.005K 0.025
73/10/05 12 00 0.0 10K 0.350 3.030 0.006 0.050
73/11/04 11 05 0.110 1.450 0.147 u.006 0.060
73/12/07 11 15 0.368 0.675 0.400 0.008 0.010
74/01/13 15 15 0.3’.0 0.150 0.012 0.012 0.015
74/02/08 11 30 0.300 0.100K 0.010 0.005 0.015
74/02/25 14 40 0.312 0.100K 0.010 0.005 0.020
74/03/08 11 30 0.312 0.100 0.040 0.010 0.010
74/03/29 11 30 0.320 0.200 0.035 0.015 0.01b
K VALUE ‘SNOWN TO BE
LESS TMAN INDICATED

-------
STORET P ETPIEV4L DATE 76/09/09
4 724C 1
35 16 29.0 086 10 19.0 4
ROCK CREEK
47 7.5 TULLA-IOMA
7/riMS FORD i ES 0406’92
8RDG NEAR FLETCHER CEMETEP Y
11E AL1 .S 211120..
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00633 00625 0 )610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTrI 02&NO3 TOT CJEL N13—N Pi40S—OIS PHOSTOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTMO
TO DAY FUEl M(,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 14 12 1.180 0. 60 0.027 0.220 0.320
73/05/15 13 c5 1.860 3.200 0.130 0.350 0.460
73/06/11 12 10 1.320 1.360 0.016 0.240 0.290
73/07/02 11 30 2.140 0.350 0.030 0.300 0.345
73/08/07 11 30 1.300 0. B0 0.333 0.450 0.480
73/09/07 12 00 1.500 0.420 0.052 0.540 0.575
73/10/05 12 15 2.260 0.550 0.066 0.43u 0.490
73/11/04 11 15 1.960 1.750 0.250 3.420 0.500
73/12/07 11 15 1.800 1.200 0.500 0.192 0.240
74/01/13 15 25 0.860 0.400 0.040 0.048 0.080
74/02/08 11 40 1.010 0.400 0.150 0.070 0.130
74/02/25 14 45 1.260 0.600 0.190 0.080 0.145
74/03/08 12 10 1.300 0.900 0.360 0.140 0.220
74/03/29 11 40 2.300 0.300 0.080 0.175 0.210

-------
STONET RETRIEVAL DATF ?b/09/09
472401
35 iS 59.0 08ô 12 00.0 4
LITTLE NUP RICANE C ELK
41 7.5 TULLA 1OMA
1/rIMS FORO RES 040692
BRD, .5 MI S OF PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH
11ErAL S 211120..
1 )000 FEET DEr 1d CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME DEPTI NO2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PriOS-DIS P iOS-TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET M(,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 16 25 1.200 0.850 3.015 0.010 0.040
73/05/15 15 00 1.240 0.580 0.025 0.009 0.015
73/06/11 12 15 1.300 0.900 0.006 0.022 0.035
73/07/02 ii 30 1.320 0 .100K 0.012 0.008 0.015
73/08/07 12 40 1.220 0.100K (1.028 0.019 0.025
73/09/07 12 10 1.080 0.120 0.010 0.016 0.025
73/ 10/OS 12 30 1.200 0.100K 0.022 0.022 0.045
73/11/04 11 ?5 1.040 0.100K 0.021 0.023 0.025
73/12/07 11 30 1.430 0.100 0.100 0.020 0.030
74/01/13 15 35 1.180 0.200 0.012 0.016 0.020
74/02/08 11 45 - 1.100 0.100K 0.010 0.015 0.015
74/02/25 15 00 1,180 0.100K ( 1.005K 0.020 0,025
76/03/08 12 20 1.260 0.100 0.030 0.015 0.020
74/03/29 11 45 1.120 0.200 “.025 0.020 0.020
K V \LUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STO ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
-.724E 1
35 17 52.0 086 16 31.0 4
TURKEY CREEK
‘+7 7.5 CUMt3ERLANO S
T/TIMS FORD RES 040692
BRDG .75 M l St OF TURKEY CwE i< SC 1OOL
1 1EPALES d 111204
0000 FEET DEPT’i CLASS 00
00630
00625
00610
00671
00665
DATE
TIME
OEPT1
N02 NO3
TOT KJEL
NH3-N
Pt-IOS—DIS
PH0S—T )T
FROM
OF
N-TOTAL
N
TOTAL
ORTHO
TO
DAY
FEET
MG/L
‘lOlL
MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L p
73/04/15
12 00
0.155
0.690
0.013
0.006
0.03 i
73/05/15
13 15
0.160
0.160
0.007
0.009
0.015
73/06/11
09 15
0.010K
1.760
0.028
0.010
0.030
73/07/02
08 45
0.290
1.890
0.027
0.018
0.040
73/08/07
LO 00
0.01
0.420
0.022
0.007
0.035
73/09/07
09 ‘.5
0.210
0.200
0.009
0. OOb
t).01,
73/10/05
08 50
0.310
0.100K
0.012
0.015
0.050
73/11/0’.
09 10
0.230
0.100K
0.014
0.013
0.020
73/12/07
09 20
0.420
0.600
0.108
0.012
0.012
74/01/13
13 25
0.232
0.200
0.016
0.016
0.020
74/02/08
09 45
0.330
0.100K
0.010
3.010
0.0 15
74/02/25
13 nO
0.270
0.100
0.010
0.015
0.055
74/03/08
10 00
0.224
0.300
0.025
0.010
0.015
74/03/29
09 15
0.152
1.?00
0.040
0.025
0.130
K VALUE KNOWN TO bE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET ETRTEVAL DATE 7e /09/09
47 4F1
35 17 35.0 086 1 05.0 4
hU 1C NE CREEK
47 7.5 C’JMc ERLAND S
T/T IMS ‘ )‘ U ES 040692
dAr K CLOSE AS POSSI8LE TO MOUTH OF ST EA
1lL ’ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 0fl610 00b71 00665
DATE TIME DEPTH NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL NH3—N PHOS-DIS PHO —TOT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL UPTH’)
TO DAY FEET t4G/L MG/L M(/L MG/L P MG/L ?
73/04/15 12 20 0.054 0.820 0.010 0.005K 0.030
73/05/15 13 00 0.240 1.680 0.037 0.010 0.015
73/06/11 0’ 35 0.013 0.750 0.014 0.007 0.025
73/07/02 09 05 0.056 0.480 0.016 0.013 0.050
73/0 /07 10 20 0.010K 0.560 0.040 0.007 0.040
73/09/07 10 00 0.010K 0.560 0.007 0.005K 0.030
73/10/05 09 30 0.198 0.100K 0.010 0.016 0.090
73/11/04 09 30 0.070 0.850 0.105 0.011 0.020
73/12/07 09 35 3.208 0.500 0.064 0.012 0.030
74/01/1) 13 45 1.600 0.300 0.020 0.024 0.045
74/02/08 10 00 0.176 0.100K 0.010 0.010 0.015
74/02/25 13 15 ).144 0.100K ).005 0.010 0.020
74/03/08 10 30 0.104 0.300 0.040 0.010 0.020
74/03/29 09 30 0.128 0.100 0.035 0.009 0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO E
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET REWIE AL DATE Th/09/09
4724G1
35 10 15.0 086 07 ‘p5.0 4
O C EEK
‘ 17 7.5 8ELVIDE E
T/TLMS Fu O PES O408 1
uS hwY 64 8ROG .5 MI Sw OF It CllESTER
11EPAL S 211120’.
0000 FEET DLPTI-I CLASS 00
00530 00625 00610 00671 O06o
DATE TINE DEPTrI NO2 NO3 TOT KJEL Nr13—N PhOS0 1S PhUSTOT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL O -iTr4O
TO DAY FEET MG/L P4G/L MC,/L MC-/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 13 20 1.3b0 0.0051< 0.00 0.060
73/05/15 14 10 1.580 0.840 0.030 0.022 0.045
73/06/11 11 00 1.440 1.680 0.027 0.014 0.025
73/07/02 09 25 1.500 2.940 0.078 0.019 0.030
73/08/07 11 12 0.038 4.100
73/11/04 10 30 0.270 1.400 0.046
73/12/07 10 30 1.900 0.300 0.160 0.028 0.045
74/01/13 14 38 0.33b 0.200 0.012 0.016 0.020
74/02/08 11 00 1.900 0.100 0.020 0.015 0.040
74/02/25 14 10 1.760 0.200 0.005 0.015 0.030
74/03/OR 11 10 1.8S0 0.300 0.017 0.015 0.037
74/03/2q 10 30 1.920 0.400 0.025 0.025 0.045
P< VALUE ‘I ’OWN TO 8E
LESS TH4 INDICATED

-------
STORET PETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
47 2’.
35 11 17.0 086 06 33.0 4
t OILING FO c CREt.ic
‘.7 7.5 1NC 4ESTEr
1/TIMS FO . D ES 040692
IN rløY SO w OG jN NE WINCIiESTE,
11E ALES 21112o .
0000 FEEl DEPTr$ CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 0( 671 00665
DATE TIME DEPT -i N02 .NO3 TOT 
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATC 76/09/09
4724 . ) !
35 12 02.0 0e46 05 41.0 ‘.
WA’, Er C tE’
47 7.5 PiCS11
T/TIMS FORD QES
US hwY 41—A AT SW EDGE OF DECI-iAWD
L IEPALES 2111204
0000 FE .T DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665
DATE TIME OE°Tri O2 .NO3 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS—DIS PhOS—TUT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORT’iO
ru DAY FF11 MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 13 40 1.140 0.910 0.105 0.260 0.330
73/06/11 11 15 1.720 0.520 0.126 0.180 0.230
73/07/02 10 10 0.082 0.940 0.019 0.050 0.155
73/12/07 10 45 1.920 0.300 0.092 0.185 0.22 5
74/ 01/I l 14 50 1.600 0.400 O.fl36 0.060 0.095
74/02/08 11 IS 1.180 0.100 (.025 0.055
74/02/25 14 75 1.520 0.500 0.095 0.105 0.160
74/03/08 11 40 1.340 0.500 0.050 0.185 0.230
74/03/29 11 LO 1.260 0.800 0.125 0.140 0.200

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATF 76/09/09
£.72L.,c 1
35 14 33.0 0d6 06 9.0 4
ht SE( 8RAF.CP-i
47 7.5 w1NCrit TE
1/rIMS F O R S 040692
US ‘I. .Y ‘el—A 13P OG 4 MI N OF w1NC 1E TE
l lr.PALFS 211120’.
00)0 FEET DEPT 1 CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 0066S
DATE TIME OEPT i NO =N03 TOT KJEL N ’-13-N PrIOS—31S PPIOS1UT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO
TO DAY FEET P’IG/L ‘4C /L M(,/L MG/L P MG/L P
73/04/15 13 ‘.9 1.160 0.800 0.015 O.005 0.035
73/05/15 14 30 1.440 1.200 0.048 0.012 0.045
73/06/11 11 ?S 1.640 1.380 0.017 0.020 0.020
73/07/02 10 70 1.820 0.960 0.029 0.01 0.030
73/12/07 11 00 1.850 0.200 0.032 0.020 0.040
74/01/13 14 55 2.000 0.250 0.032 C.04i) 0.06u
74/02/08 11 ?0 1.680 0.600 0.115 0.015 0.020
74/02/25 14 30 1.700 0.200 0.020 0.015 0.025
74/03/08 11 45 1.360 0.300 0.025 0.010 0.020
74/03/29 11 20 1.300 0.400 0.010 0.015 0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO bE
LESS T ’-i N INDIC’ TE)

-------
TOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
47244A TF472’.AA P006700
35 12 02.0 086 07 05.0 4
Ir C-ttSTE’
47 7.5 W1NCME TE
T/TIMS FORD RESERVOIk 040692
bOILING FORK CREEK/ELK RIVER
L1EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 S )051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTH M02&N03 TOT KJEL NK3-N PHOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOW CONDUiT
FROM OF N—TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW—MGD
TO DAY FEET HG/I MG/L HG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST HGO MONTHLY
73/05/31 08 00
CP(T)— 2.810 4.000 0.411 3.680 4.400 0.791 0.513
73/06/01 08 00
73/07/04 07 00
CP(T)— 3.200 10.000 3.200 15.000 15.000 0.320 0.512
73/07/05 07 00
73/08/05 (17 00
CP(T)— 11.800 5.800 1.200 14.000 14.500 0.300 0.350
73/08/06 07 00
73/09/06 19 00
CP(T) 11.000 11.300 3.020 0.500 0.400
73/09/07 19 00
73/10/08 07 00
CP(T)— 9.100 23.000 10.000 17.900 18.000 0.400 0.500
73/10/09 07 00
73/11/07 07 00
CP(T)— 7.400 11.500 7.400 13.100 13.500 0.337 0.400
73/11/08 07 00
73/12/03 07 00 0.170 16.500 4.600 7.200 9.300
74/01/03 07 00 3.600 6.800 1.560 4.200 5.200 0.906 0.594
74/02/01 07 00 3.120 8.700 3.900 4.900 6.000 0.782 0.993
74/03/01 07 00 4.000 13.000 6.100 7.700 8.600 0.477 0.733
74/06/06 07 00 13.600 9.000 4.200 7.800 9.000 0.445 0.348
74/07/01 07 00 14.300 9.600 4.400 13.500 15.700 0.212 0.389

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/09/09
4724CA 1F4724CA P01S0O0
35 20 48.0 0 a 12 40.0 4
T ULL A MOM A
4 , ’ 7.5 rULLAHOMA
T/ tMS FORU RESERVOIP 04069?
ROCK CWEEr /ELK RIVER
L 1EPALES 21.12 0 ’.
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DArE TIME DEPTrI N02 NO3 TOT KJF.L Nr13 — Ph05015 PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
FROM OF N-TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw—MGD
TO DAY FEET 146/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTMLY
73/12/03 06 00
CP(T)— 4,700 10.000 3.200 2.100 3.700 3.000 2.000
73/12/0’. 06 00
74/01/17 06 00
CP(T)— 3.900 12.000 5.600 5. OVO 3.510
74/01/18 06 00
74/02/27 06 00
CP(T)— 3.000 9.800 1.390 1.125 2.600 3.520 5.000
74/02/28 06 00
74/04/30 06 00
CP(T)— 5.800 23.000 6.100 3.950 5.200 1.550 2.900
74/04/30 24 00
74/05/30 06 00
CP(T)— 2.000 19.000 3.750 2.700 3.800 2.500 2.800
74/05/30 12 00
7’./06/25 06 00
CP(T)— 2.100 32.500 13.500 3.000 4.100 1.400 2.300
74/06/25 24 00
74/07/30 06 00
CP(T)— 4.400 15.000 2.000 4.200 5.700 1.400 2.000
74/07/30 24 00
74/08/28 06 00
CP(T)— 1.600 30.000 1G.500 5.400 6,100 1.400 1.800
74/08/28 24 00

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE I /O9/09
4724rtA TF472 4HA P001800
35 09 50.0 086 00 22.0 4
Co AN
47 7.5 wLNCr E TE
huMs FORt) RESEkVOIR 0 .0692
BOILING FORK CREEK/ELK RIVER
L1E’ ALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 O Obb S 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPTrI N1O2 N03 TOT KJEL N’43—N H0SDIS PMOS—TOT FLOw CONL)UIT
FROM OF ‘ —TOTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw—MGO
TO DAY FEET MG/L RG/L M /L MG/L P HG/L P INST MCjD MONT-4LV
73/Ob/OS 10 00
CP(T)— 4.130 5.300 0.?16 6.730 7.600 0.317 0.216
73/06/05 15 00
73/07/05 10 00
CP(T)— 4.100 18.000 3.800 4.300 5.200 0.190 0.24
73/07/05 15 00
73/08/03 10 00
CP(T)— 4.600 6.000 0.700 4.200 9.150 0.200 0.158
73/08/03 15 00
73/09/11 10 00
CP(T)— .231 28.000 7.250 10.100 14.000 0.240 0.216
73/09/11 15 00
73/10/05 10 00
CP(T)— 5.800 12.500 0.550 8.200 9.000 0.268 0.242
73/10/05
73/11/02 10 00
4.200 10.500 0.095 7.200 10.000 0.245 0.236
73/11/02 15 00
73/12/08 08 00
CP(T)— 7.100 4.000 0.120 4.900 5.700 0.217 0.188
73/12/08 22 00
74/01/10 10 00
CP(T)— 5.280 1.200 0.120 1.680 2.100 0.180 0.175
74/01/lu 15 00
74/02/14 10 00
CP(T)— 5.600 4.700 0.150 4.000 4.700 0.230 0.236
74/02/14 15 00
74/03/08 10 00
CPU)— 4.000 12.000 1.900 5.100 7.500 0.236 0.231
7’./03/08 15 00
7’./05/1S 09 00
CP(T)— 4.400 11.000 0.578 7.050 7.900 0.222 0.245
74/05/15 13 00
74/06/06 07 30
CPU)— 5.400 4.600 0.093 5.200 S.800 0.218 0.210
74/06/06 13 30

-------
STORET REIPIEvAL DATE 7 /og/o9
4724r A TF412’. ’-4A P001800
35 0 50.0 086 00 2 .fl 4
COWA .
7.5 LNCHE TL
1/rIMS F0 O RE5 01 0406’2
SOILING FO c C LEPc,EL ( IVE&
LIEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTr-i CLASS 00
00630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
DATE TIME DEPPI N02&N03 TOT KJEL NrlJ—N PriOS—DIS PHOS—TOT FLOw CONOUII
FROM OF N—TOTAL P .1 TOTAL UPTI-lO PATE FLOW—MOO
TO DAY FEET MO/L MC /L MG/L MG/L P MC /L P INSt MOD MONTHLY
7 -./O7/09 09 00
CP(T)— 9.900 5.400 0.860 10.000 11.000 0.211 0.215
74/07/09 13 00

-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY lIES IN 1974
STATE OF TENNESSEE

-------
LA L aT o ‘ i -i E.i I’ i
0DE
L E rIAUE
T T L
.
E N EC
12.’fl
&.3 -’
‘.7C
LA (E aA, KLc.1
‘7j. i
1 .’lS
1’. )
Q.j2
7O’.
J0 1E sEqvoi
“.2.371
.1b0
.Ô IO
0.O -.
‘.70t
CiL Tr1A 4 E EPV0t
0.14?
0. ’ .&(i
‘ .73. 00
12.162
15.000
0.022
‘.707
C ’ILRO”EE ia,cE
0.OS’i
0.7t 0
‘.4 .b67
3.111
.600
0.012
4708
CIICKAMAUGA LA” E
0.031
0.443
‘.63. 33
442.d2i
‘ ..553
15.000
0.01’.
4711
OOUC LAS LR’(E
0.025
.4”)
4.776
12.600
0.02
‘.712
FORT LOU0O’ I ES&V01F(
0.3”
0.550
4t ,E,.57 1
3.983
14. 00
0.007
4713
G EAT FALLS L 
-------
iE ¼.LUL)
PERCE1 T jF L. .PcE T’ HtGI- P4 E? uF L. -1 ’ES IT -
15-
[ N
LAKE
CODE
L E N ME
TOTAL P
INO,Q(, \
iE N SEC
j A
- C 1)
IN DJ
73
) S5 i
2)
i ;
4701
LA .E APr(LET
13 C
2)
0
6)
13 C
2)
C
3)
4 .7 C
P
(
. )
200
“704
BOO E RESE VOI
40 (
6)
0 (
0)
73 C
11)
2 .
40
b)
U
U)
1’ 1
4706
CHEATHAM RESERVOIR
1)
“
7)
7 (
ii
13 C
2)
13 (
0)
40
6)
176
4707
CHEROKEE LAKE
50 (
7)
7 C
1)
53 1
93 (
14)
90 C
13)
70
10)
416
4708
CHICKAMAUGA LAKE
67 C
10)
63 1
9)
33 1
C
5)
10)
80 C
12)
13 (
0?
60 C
9)
3 6
471.!
DOUGLAS LA’cE
73 C
11)
63 (
9)
bi
73 (
11)
60 C
9)
27
4)
240
4712
FORT LOUDON RESERVOIR
33 (
5)
20 1
3)
27 C 4)
87 1
13
40 1
6)
93 1 14)
440
4713
GREAT FALLS LAKE
87 (
13)
73 C
11)
60 C 9)
100 C
15)
80 ( 12)
33 C 5)
343
4717
NICKAJACK RESERVOIR
50 C
7)
33 C
5)
47
(
33 C
5)
100 C 15)
53 8)
306
4720
OLD HICKORY LAKE
20 (
3)
80 C
12)
20
1 3)
67 C
10)
67 1 10)
70 1 10)
331
4722
WATTS BAR RESERVOIR
60
9)
27 (
4)
40
1 6)
C
4)
13
C 0)
47
1 7)
294
4723
J PERCY PRIEST RESERVOI
27 1
4)
100 C
15)
80
C 12)
27
1
9)
33
1 5)
80
1 12)
406
4724
TIM’S FORD RESERVOIR
80 C
12)
53 C
8)
100
C 15)
‘.7 1
7)
13
C 0)
87
1 13)
353
4725
SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE
100 (
15)
13 (
2)
93
C 14)
0 (
0)
53
1 8)
7
1 1)
153
4727
REELFO0T LAKE
0 (
0)
93 (
14)
0
1 0)
4728 WoODS RESERVOIR
93 1 14) 87 1 13) 87 C 13) 53 C 8)

-------