I LI —
I I — —1 j I — i _1, —
I_I_I _:I ,j y l_ — I___ —J_I I
— — I — I I - — . -‘ I - L I __ _ I
—I - - I 1—
EPA -330/1-88-003
MULTI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING
OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION VII
January 1988
-
I- i
a__ : 1 J 1 i
- _ _ ._ ‘- -. —
I - Il_I
i J: J - I
— u_ I
: ‘
1 t:
— ii _I. i --J _I - -::- - -
I _- — I’
-,
I L - I. •• I
L
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING
EPA -330/1-88-003
MUL.TI-MEDIA PRIORITY RANKING
OF SELECTED FEDERAL FACILITIES
REGION VII
January 1988
Joel K. Mattern
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Denver, Co’orado
-------
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODS 3
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA) 3
SITE CONTAMINATION (CERCLA) 6
WASTE WATER DISCHARGES (CWA) 7
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL (PCB)
STORAGE AND USE (TSCA) 8
AIR EMISSIONS (CAA) 8
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA) 9
RESULTS 10
TABLES
1 Facility Rating Criteria 5
2 Facility Ratings (by ranking) 11
3 Facility Ratings (by State) 15
-------
INTRODUCTION
In order to more effectively allocate EPA investigation resources, a multi-
media prionty ranking model was developed by NEIC in 1984 (updated July
1987) to evaluate selected Federal facilities according to their relative potential
for having environmental problems. 1 The objective was to use readily available
information in a rapid and objective manner to identify “high priority” facilities for
further detailed evaluation by EPA. The ranking model was not designed to
compare a facility rating with any fixed number to indicate whether a facility is
environmentally “good” or “bad”. Rather, the rating is a preliminary indication of
a facility’s potential, relative to other installations, for having major
environmental problems. A high rating indicates that a facility has a relatively
high potential for environmental problems, and that further evaluation, if not
already completed, is warranted.
Rating criteria were developed and used to rank facilities according to
the type and magnitude of facility activities which actually or could potentially
result in environmental contamination. In general, these activities include past
and present hazardous waste 2 generation and management, handling and
storage of hazardous and toxic materials, wastewater discharges and air
emissions. For purposes of this ranking system and in keeping with EPA
Region VII and Headquarters priorities, emphasis was put on potential
environ mental problems from hazardous waste management activity.
To ensure timely and consistent ratings for each installation, the
information used to rank the facilities was that which was easily accessible and
available for all or most of the installations. The major source of information
used to rank the facilities came from various EPA computer databases. This
information was supplemented, as necessary, with Region VII file data. More
specific information, such as detailed site inspection reports, was not used
because such information is available for only a few facilities. Facility
1 Environmental problems, as generally used here, are directly related to the release of
contaminants to the environment.
2 As defined in 40 CFR 261
-------
2
compliance data was not incorporated into the ranking system because of the
dynamic nature of such information. 1
Specific facility information and recent compliance data would be used as part of the
detailed folio wup evaluation of a facility, if warranted.
-------
3
METHODS
The list of facilities to be prioritized was chosen by Region VII from an
initial listing of Region VII Federal facilities generated from EPA’s computerized
Facilities Index System (FINDS). The FINDS list contained all (more than 250)
Federal installations with: (1) known or suspected hazardous waste disposal
sites (active and inactive), (2) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
permit application or permits on file with EPA, (3) National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permits and/or (4) air emission point sources. Of
these, 38 were selected by Region VII for prioritization by NEIC.
Selected facilities were ranked based on the type and relative level of
activity in the following six categories:
• Hazardous waste management
• Site contamination (known and potential)
• Wastewater discharges
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) storage and use
• Air emissions
• Drinking water supplies
These six categories generally reflect pertinent activities regulated by
one or more of six environmental statutes: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Ad (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA), the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA),
respectively. The six rating categories and an explanation of the information
used to rank Facilities in each category follow.
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT (RCRA
This category ranks facilities according to the potential for environmental
contamination through generation and handling of hazardous waste. For rating
purposes, the category was divided into four activity subcategories: (1) Annual
quantity of hazardous waste generated, (2) waste storage design capacity,
(3) waste treatment design capacity and (4) waste disposal design capacity.
-------
4
These general subcategories were used because of the type of information
readily available and the wide range of possible activities and levels of activities
related to hazardous waste management.
The major source of information used for this category was the EPA
Hazardous Waste Data Management System (HWDMS), a computer database
which includes information submitted to EPA by hazardous waste
generation/handling facilities in ACRA Part A and/or Part B permit applications.
The data includes type and quantity of hazardous wastes generated, types of
hazardous waste handling activity and design capacity of waste processes.
Information was obtained from EPA Region VII RCRA files when the computer
database was incomplete (all information was not available for all hazardous
waste facilities).
As shown in Table 1, the minimum rating for any facility generating
hazardous waste is 3. This accounts for activities involving actual generation
and any short term or small quantity handling of waste. Generating facilities
with RCRA storage, treatment or disposal activities were rated according to the
relative level of activity in each subcategory as shown in Table 1. An additional
rating point was assigned to all these facilities to account for potential problems
involved in the actual waste generating process(es). Also, facilities which treat,
store or dispose of hazardous waste in a surface impoundment were assigned
an additional subcategory rating point due to enhanced contamination potential
attributed to the use of impoundments. Subcategory ratings and any additional
rating points were added together to obtain the overall rating for each facility for
“Hazardous Waste Management” as presented in Tables 2 ( overall facility
ranking) and 3 (facility ranking within each state). For example, a facility
generating 12 metric tons of hazardous waste annually, having 1 0,000 gallons
of container storage capacity and 1,000 gallons per day tank treatment capacity
would, following Table 1, receive 2 rating points for quantity of waste generated,
2 points for storage, 2 points for treatment and 1 point for being a waste
generator (see footnote 1 on Table 1) for a total rating of 7 points for hazardous
waste management. This ranking is an indication of the facility’s relative
potential to contaminate the environment and cause environmental problems
through hazardous waste management.
-------
Table 1
FACILITY RATING CRITERIA
Hazaidous W te Mana ement 1
Site Contamiriabon
Quantity Storage Treatment Disposal Capacity
Soil/Water Bulk Storage
Contami- ot Hazardous
Generated Capacity Capacity Landfill Land Application
Rating (m tons/Year) (gal) (gal iday) (acres-if) (acres)
Seriousness nation Matenal
0 0 0 0 0 0
No 2 No 2 No 2
1 <12 <10,000 100,000 >50,000 <5 <10
Medium or - -
unknown
4 500-50,000 - • 10
High - -
5 >50,000 - - - -
NPL 4 Known 5 -
Toxic
Water
Wastewater Discharges 6 Substances
Flow SIC 7 Number of Criteria
Rate Toxicity Toxic PCB Pollutants 8 Discharged
P irEniss ions Suoplies
Discharge to Suspected Hazardous No of
Nonattainment Air Pollutant 9 Persons
Rating (mgd) Group Discharge Use at 100 Tons Per Year
Areas Discharges Supplied
0 No 2 <3 No 2 No 2 No 2
No 2 No 2 No 2
1 - - - - 010
- - <1000
2 <5 - Suspected 3 Suspected 3 1
- - 1 000
3 5-1.5 .3 Known - 2
jll -
4 1.5-2.5 - - Known >2
2 12 Yes -
5 >2.5 - - - -
>2 - -
1. The minimum rating br any facibty generating hazardous waste, regardless of any storage, treatment or disposal activities is 3 Facilities with
RCAA storage, treatment and/or disposal act wines are assigned subcategory ratings, as indicated in the table An additional point is added to
all these facilities ii they are also generators (see text). Facilities 1iidi treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste in a surface impoundment
are assigned an additional point (see text).
2. No No known or suspected activity in this activity categoiy or subcategory
3. Suspected means that information suggests nonspecthc activity in the subcategory
4 NPL means the facility is bsted or has been pioposed for listing on the National Prionbes List
5 Facilities with known or potential contamination of drinking water supplies are assigned two additional rating points (total of 7)
6 Ineiudes known discharges to municipal wastewater treatment plants
7. SIC Hazard Potential (a number from I (lowest) to 5(highest)j is an indication of potentially harmful health elf ects related to a specific Standard
lndustnal Classification (SIC) code (see text).
8 As debnedin 40 CFR5O.
9 Hazardous air pollutant (40 CFR 61) emission sources with or without other air sources
10. Facility has point source emissions but does not have the potential to discharge at 100 tons per year per pollutant
11. Facility discharges one nonattainment pollutant in nonattainment area for that pollutant
12 Facility discharges two nonattainment pollutants in nonattainment area for those pollutants
-------
6
SITE CONTAMINATION (CERCLA )
This category ranks facilities according to the actual, suspected or
potential for site contamination from either past operations or the present
handling of bulk quantities of hazardous materials (fuel oil, gasoline, etc). The
category is divided into three activity subcategories: (1) seriousness of site
contamination problems, (2) contamination of soil and water, and (3) handling
of bulk quantities of hazardous materials.
Information was obtained from the following EPA computer data bases:
FINDS, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Information System (CERCLIS), Compliance Data System (CDS) and the
Federal Facility Compliance Docket. EPA Region VII file information was used
to supplement these data. FINDS lists all known or suspected facility sites
which were contaminated as a result of past activities. CERCLIS tracks these
sites and identifies those which are proposed or listed on the National Priority
List (NPL). Regional files contain reports of the results of any EPNState or
Department of Defense site investigations (such as preliminary assessments)
for the suspected CERCLA sites. Preliminary assessment reports and other
documents rate the “seriousness” of site problems as being low, medium or
high and indicate the type of site contamination (soil, water), if known. CDS lists
installations with storage facilities for bulk hazardous materials (fuel oil,
gasoline) through its inventory of volatile organic air emissions.
Rating points were assigned to each facility for activity in each of the
three subcategories using Table 1. Facilities with known contamination of
drinking water supplies were assigned two additional rating points. The sum of
these ratings is the facility’s overall rating for “Site Contamination” and is
presented in Tables 2 and 3. An overall rating of 2 indicates that there is no
known or suspected site contamination, but there is the potential for
contamination due to onsite bulk storage of hazardous materials.
The files did not contain the resu s of preliminary assessments or other
site evaluations for all facilities with known or suspected 1 site contamination.
1 Known or suspected as a result of being included in the FINDS computer data base.
-------
7
Subcategory ratings of 3 for “seriousness” and 2 for “soil/water contamination”
were assigned to such facilities with limited or no specific site information to
account for the unknown potential for problems in these subcategories
[ Table 1].
WASTE WATIFJ DISCHARGES (CWA )
This category rates facilities according to the actual or potential impacts
of wastewater discharges into receiving waters. The three subcategories used
to rate facility activity in this category were: (1) average daily flow rate; (2) the
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 1 code for the facility’s waste generating
activities and general wastewater type (industrial, sanitary or both) and (3) sus-
pected discharge of toxic wastewater.
Information on the type and flow rate of wastewater discharges was
obtained from the Permit Compliance System (PCS) and EPA Region VII
NPDES files. SIC codes and toxic discharge information for each facility were
taken from the EPA computer systems and Region VII files. SIC codes were
used to assign each facility to a SIC toxicity group. Each SIC toxicity group from
1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) correlates to the potential for harmful effects from
wastewater discharges from a specific industry (as identified by the SIC code).
The SIC Coc e/Toxic Pollutant Discharge Potential component of the NPDES
permit ranking system, used by EPA nationally to classify dischargers as ‘major’
or ‘minor’, was used to assign Toxicity Group Numbers to the wastewater
discharge facilities ranked here.
In cases where SIC codes were not readily available for installations
rated, EPA Region VII file information regarding facility operations and waste
generation was used to determine an appropriate Toxicity Group Number.
Toxicity Group Numbers were used to help characterize wastewater discharge
in lieu of specific information regarding wastewater characteristics. Also,
facilities known or suspected of discharging toxic wastewater were assigned
additional rating points. Flow rates, general wastewater type, Toxicity Group
1 The SIC code is a number which describes an industry by the type of activity in which stis
engaged.
-------
8
Number and suspected discharge of toxic wastewater were used with Table 1 to
assign ratings to each facility in each subcategory. Subcategory ratings were
totaled to obtain the wastewater discharge ratings presented for each facility in
Tables 2 and 3.
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL (PCB) STORAGE AND USE (TSCA )
This category rates facilities according to information regarding use of
PCBs. Information to identify facilities storing/using these compounds was
obtained through all possible sources including the Department of Defense
A-106 tracking system (which tracks environmental actions at military
installations), HWDMS, FINDS and Region VII files. Facilities were rated
according to Table 1. Department of Defense facilities with no specific
information regarding PCBs were assigned a rating point of 2 for this category.
This is because general information indicates that most military installations
handle PCBs and therefore, PCB use is “suspected”. Category ratings for each
facility are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
AIR EMISSIONS (CAA )
This category rates facilities according to: (1) the number of criteria air
pollutants (particulates, nitrous oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide and
volatile organic carbon) emitted through point sources; (2) emissions of
hazardous pollutants and (3) emission of pollutants into areas of nonattainment,
as shown in Table 1. The 100-tons-per-year rate for criteria air pollutants was
used in the rating because that is the emission rate normally used to
differentiate between major and minor point air emission sources. Facilities
which do not have the potential to emit any criteria pollutants at greater than or
equal to 100 tons per year were given a ranking of 1 for that subcategory.
Additional ranking points were assigned facilities which emit nonattainment
pollutants into nonattainment air quality control regions and/or discharge
hazardous air pollutants. No attempt was made to incorporate fugitive
emissions into the rating system.
Information on emission rates was obtained from the Compliance Data
System (CDS), an EPA computer database containing information on permitted
-------
9
point air emission sources and EPA Region VII files. Facilities were rated
quantitatively according to Table 1. Results for each facility are presented in
Tables 2 and 3.
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA )
This category rates a facility’s potential impact according to; (1) whether it
handles its own drinking water supplies or is situated over a public drinking
water supply and (2) the size of the population served by the facility.
Information was obtained from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS),
Public Water Source data. Table 1 identifies how the rating points were
assigned.
-------
10
RESULTS
Table 2 shows the selected Federal facilities and their assigned ratings
ranked in decreasing order of overall potential for environmental problems
Table 3 presents these same facilities segregated by State and ranked in
decreasing order of potential environmental problems. These tables are not
only useful in identifying facilities with relatively high potential for environmental
problems, but they also show which activity(ies) should be considered in
developing a strategy for followup site inspections.
As previously stated, the facility rating was not designed to be compared
to a fixed number to indicate whether an installation is environmentally “good”
or “bad”. Rather, the rating indicates the potential of a particular facility to have
environmental problems based on the potential for environmental
contamination relative to other installations. A relatively high total rating
indicates that, based on the type and level of onsite activities, a facility has a
high probability of having environmental problems. It also indicates that a more
detailed evaluation of the facility is warranted.
This prioritization system is an initial evaluation of selected facilities.
Further evaluations should be conducted prior to any onsite investigations.
Such evalualions should begin with a detailed analysis of EPA Region VII files
and include a review of facility compliance status.
-------
Table 2 11
FACILITY RATING (by ranking)
EPA FACILITY ZARDOJS SITE POINT DRI *CI POINT
ID f1ESS WASTE CONT 4— WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR TOT
CITY GEI€NT IWATIOM DISD R6ES SUBST CES JPPLY EMISS R * ING
1A7213820445 IOWA ARMY 1 UIITI I PL T 14 12 8 4 2 4 44
yl9
Middleton, I i
MO3213890012 LJ (E CITY A IY !U ITION PLT 11 13 6 4 2 6
M04213820489 junction F 7876
Indeoa ence, MO
989001O524 US 00E NC PIPN - BENDIX 12 11 8 4 0 5 40
M08890510524 200 East 95th Street
Kansas City, MO
K53213820878 SLRfLOI€R ARMY BI24ITION PLT 16 10 5 4 2 1 38
103rd St , 3 mi south of town
Desoto, KS
?E857 1924648 RJTT AIR FORCE BASE 9 12 5 4 0 6 36
P€2971524686 3902 AS /DEEV
Offutt B , NE
1 ( 56214020756 FT RILEY & 1ST It 1TRY DIV 10 10 8 4 2 0 34
KS8971520756 Dickeian Avenue
Ft Riley, KS
1(50213820467 KANSAS ARMY A AMT ION R.ANT 7 10 6 4 1 1 29
3 miles east 3f town
Parsons 1 KS
3213720979 FORT LE RD I OD & USAIC 4 10 3 4 2 4 27
M09971520975 £44
Ft Leonard Wood, MO
(18571924549 I8lITD AIR FORCE BASE 4 10 6 4 0 2 26
(12971524549 I iit an B
Knob Cster, IC
1(51571924140 I4cCOB€.1. AIR FORCE BASE 4 10 6 4 0 0 24
KS3971524140 2801 South Rc k Road
Wichita, KS
(14210021222 ST LOUIS ARMY IUIITION PL.ANT 3 10 5 4 0 0 22
4800 Soodfellow Blvd
St. Louis, MD
-------
Table 2 (cont.) 12
EPA FACILITY ZPRDOIJS SITE POINT DRUI(I I6 POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE COPiT — WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR TOT
CITY V GOU4T IWATION DISC RSES SUBST CES SUPPLY EMISS R 8 JNG
KS42 13720499 FT LER dOR1H I US PI !Y CRC 4 7 3 4 2 1 21
KS9213720395 DEN Bldg 85
Ft Leavevieorth, KS
9571824292 RIQ RDS 6EB UR AIR FORT BASE 0 10 5 4 0 2 21
3257 1224292 1501 US Hay 71
lton, NS
33210090004 LDON SPRIIES O NICRL 3 14 2 0 0 0 19
M06210022830 State IWy 94, 2 mi south
St. Charles, NO
E2213820234 (i] f JSKER ARMY IU4ITION .T 0 14 0 4 0 1 19
6 .iles west of town
& and Island, €
NO8750090013 FT CROWDER TEST SITE 0 12 0 4 0 0 16
HayD
Wesho, NO
148123490007 4I t?1 DISEASE CENTER 4 5 5 0 0 I 15
Dayton Road
es, IA
NO5210021288 LDON SPRIP€3 FT LECI WOOD 0 11 0 4 0 0 15
25 ules west of St. Louis
St. Charles 1 ND
NO821002_24 5 ST LOUIS ORD CE 0 10 0 4 0 0 14
4300 Soodfellow Blvd
St. Louis1
KS4151909120 US ITB4TI ff 3 5 a 2 0 1 13
1300 Metropoliitan Ave
Laaveva.orth, 115
146890008950 V(S LABORATORY 3 5 0 4 0 0 12
117 Speddir,q Hall
e s 1IA
NO4570090023 DEFENSE PPIP6 A6ENCY — FEE 3 5 0 4 0 0 12
3200 South Second St.
St. Louis, NO
-------
Table 2 (cont.) 13
EPA FACILITY ZARDOUS SITE POINT DRDEING POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONTAM— WASTLIdATER TOXIC WATER AIR TOT .
CITY M 6E)ENT IWATION DISC1 R6ES SUBSTAMCES 9JPPLY EMISS R I IM3
P€71 70090032 WAD—I RC — YA D1 P 0 8 0 4 0 0 12
Sec 5 T6N R1114
Clay Center, I E
8151990035 US D CENTER FOR FED PRISION 3 5 0 2 1 0 11
1900 West Sunshine
Springfield, MO
MO1210020813 TEWAY ARMY U IT1ON PLN T 0 7 0 4 0 0 11
6703 Southeast Ave
St. Louig, M D
E212O51%06 AT AMI L ESEARCH CENTER 3 5 0 2 0 1 11
State spur lED
Clay Center, PE
)€1120090021 USDA SIN SITE (FO €R) 0 10 0 0 1 0 11
West Street
Nurdock, PE
1A8210890028 DES MOIt€S DRDP E WORMS 0 8 0 2 0 0 10
Hwy 415
keny, IA
MO5180090032 USPS HICLE IWT FACILITY 3 5 0 2 0 0 10
3131 Wyandotte
Kansas City, MO
MO0210090066 1 LDON SPRINSS LX ARMY ORDAMCE 0 8 0 2 0 0 10
State I liiy 94
St. Charles 1 MO
MO5570090022 D ENSE PPIMB AGEICY - FAC 3 5 0 2 0 0 10
8900 South froadsay
- St. Louis, MO
PE814 90016 P *JRTRY PW R 0 8 0 2 0 0 10
1 .ila south on Hwy 6
Clay County, 1€
1A4210090029 WAYERLY (EX) AIR STATIJI 0 7 0 2 0 0 9
I .ile south of tosm
Waverly, IA
-------
Table 2 (cont.) 14
EPA FACILITY ZRRDOUS SITE POINT DRIP UN8 POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONT — WASTEI TER TOXIC WATER AIR TDT
u. cirv j j T jj Tj 4 DISC1 R6ES SUBST CES SUPPLY E ISS (IN6
M06210490037 BOODFELLOW LS ARI Y RESERVE CNT 0 5 0 4 0 0 9
Goodfellow goad
St. Lotus, 10
€7 122390001 US FOREST SERVICE - BESSY NRSY 3 5 0 0 1 0 9
Box 38
Halsey, NC
314 . 19533 COLLMBIA T FISH RESEARCH LAB 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
Route I
Coluebia,
€3180090026 VEHICLE IN FACILITY LINCOLN 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
700 R Street
Lircoln, NE
NC4180090025 VEHICLE D1T FACILITY - O# l 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
1124 Pacific Street
iaha, NC
-------
Table 3 15
FACILITY RATING (by State)
EP FACILITY ZARDOJS SITE POINT DRDI(ING POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CONT — WASTEIdATER TOXIC WATER AIR TOT
CITY M dAG iT IPdATIOtd DISC1 R9ES SUBST CE5 SUPPLY ENISS RPI qN6
1A7213820445 IOWA ARMY i ITION PtJ E4T 14 12 8 4 2 4 44
y 7 9
Niddleton, 1
1A8123490007 WATIO . DISEASE CENTER 4 5 5 0 0 1 15
Dayton Road
nes, IA
1A6890008950 AMES LABORATORY 3 5 0 4 0 0 12
117 Spedding Hall
Ames, IA
1A8210890028 DES MODES ORD dCE WORKS 0 8 0 2 0 0 10
Hwy 415
Artkeny, IA
1A4210090029 WAVERLY (El) AIR STATI I 0 7 0 2 0 0 9
1 nile south of town
i4averly, IA
KS321 3820878 S1JFL( dER ARMY OI ITION PLT 16 10 5 4 2 1 38
10 d St , 3 ii south of town
Desoto, KS
S6214020756 FT RILEY & 1ST D (TRY DIV 10 10 8 4 2 0 34
KS8971520756 Dickian Averite
Ft Riley, KS
S021 3820467 K SAS ARMY MU.$ITION PLl ff 7 10 6 4 1 1 29
3 eiles east of t m
Parsons, KS
1 (51571924140 NcCC UfLi. RI FORCE BASE 4 10 6 4 0 0 24
KS5971524140 2801 South Rcck Road
Wichita, KS
S4213720499 FT LEAV9i CRTH & US ARMY CAC 4 7 3 4 2 1 21
KS9213720395 DElI Bldg 85
Ft L.eavenworth, KS
KS4151909120 US PENITENTIARY 3 5 2 2 0 1 13
1300 Metropolitan Ave
eavem orth, KS
-------
Table 3 (cont.) 16
EPA FACILITY } ZARDOIJS SITE POINT DRINKIN6 POINT
ID ADDRCSS WASTE CONT — WASTEWATER TOXIC WATER AIR TQ7 _
0. CITY F%’ 4 6O(NT IWATION DISD R6ES SU8ST CES SUPPLY EMISS (IN6
M03213890012 LAi(E CITY ARMY ! i ITI 4 PIT 11 13 6 4 2 6 ‘+2
MO4213820489 junction Hwys 7 & 78
Independence, MO
*D9890010524 US DOE KC PLWT — BENDIX 12 11 8 4 0 5 44)
MC8890510524 200 East 95t, Street
Kansas City 1 MO
I321 3720979 FORT LEON1 RD WOOD & USAIC 4 10 3 4 2 4 27
M09971520979 144
Ft Leonard IIod, MO
MO8571924549 ( ITEI AIR FORCE BASE 4 10 6 4 0 2 26
M02971524549 White!an B
Knob Noster, MO
MO.4210021222 ST LOUIS A V( JNITION PLAiT 3 10 5 4 0 0 22
4800 6oodfel Low Blvd
St. Louis, MO
C9571824292 RID RDS GEB JR AIR FORCE BASE 0 10 5 4 0 2 21
M02571224292 Hwy 150 & US Hwy 71
Belton, MO
MO3210090004 IELDOM SPRI S DOIC . 3 14 2 0 0 0 19
M06210022830 State Hwy 94, 2 •i south
St. Charles, NO
NO8750090013 FT CROWDER TEST SITE 0 12 0 4 0 0 16
HwyD
sho,NO
NO5210021288 I€LDON SPRINSS FT LE RD WOOD 0 11 0 4 0 0 15
25 utles west of St. Louis
St. Charles, MO
NO8210022465 ST LOUIS ORD IICE PL i1 0 10 0 4 0 0 14
4300 Goodfellow Blvd
St. Louis, MO
J04570090023 D ENSE PPIN6 A6EPCY — FEE 3 5 0 4 0 0 12
3200 South Second St.
St. Louis, MO
-------
Table 3 (cont.) 17
EPA F CILITY ZARDOUS SITE O1NT DRI I POINT
ID ADDRESS WASTE CCNTt !— WASTE TER TOXIC WATER AIR TOT
CITY GOENT INATION DISD R6ES SUBST *CES SUPPLY EMISS RA1 (1P
M081 51990035 US MED CENTER FOR FED PRISION 3 5 0 2 1 0 ii
1900 West Sunshine
Springfield, MO
MO1210020813 GATEWAY ARMY JUTION P1J 4T 0 7 0 4 0 0 11
6703 Southeast Ave
St. Louis, II)
MO5180090032 USPS VEHICLE MINT FACILITY 3 5 0 2 0 0 10
3131 Wyandot ;e
‘(.ansas City, MO
P00210090056 WELDON SPRINSS LX ARJ Y ORD ICE 0 8 0 2 - 0 0 10
State I Wy 94
St. Charles, MO
05570090022 DEFENSE PP NS AGENCY — FAC 3 5 0 2 0 0 10
8900 South Broadway
St. Louis, MO
P06210490037 GOQDFELLOW US A Y RESERVE CNT 0 5 0 4 0 0 9
Goodfellow Road
St. Louis, MO
P03143519533 COUJ BIA NAT FISH RESEARCH LAB 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
Route I
Columbia, MO
€8571924648 QFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE 9 12 5 4 0 6 36
NE2971524 86 3902 ABWDEEV
Offutt FB, NE
E221382O234 CCR KS(ER AEWY ITION PIT 0 14 0 4 0 1 19
6 miles west of town
Brand Island, PC
!E7170090032 NAD- RC - Y iRD DtJ1P 0 8 0 4 0 0 12
Sec 5 T6N REh
Clay Center, PC
PE21 05l9606 NEAT 4I RESEARCH CENTER 3 5 0 2 0 1 11
State spur lED
Clay Center, NE
-------
Table 3 (cont.) 18
EP FACILITY ZARD0LIS SITE POINT DRIM(IN6 2OINT
ID ADD SS WASTE CONT — WASTEWATER rax ic WATER IR T0T
O. CITY ‘ 6E1 P4T IWATION DISD R6ES SUBST cES SUPPLY ENISS A iN
P€1120090021 USDA BIN SITE (F0 EP) 0 10 0 0 1 0
st Street
Nuraock, PE
PE8143690016 Nc JR1RY RSH 0 8 0 2 0 0 10
1 mile south on IIy 6
Clay County, PE
?€7122390001 US FO ST SERVICE — BESSY NRSY 3 5 0 0 1 0
8o 38
a1sey, PE
PE3180090026 VEHICLE IN FACILITY LINCOLN 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
700 R Street
Lircoln,
P€4180090025 VEHICLE MAINI FACILITY — 3 5 0 0 0 0 8
1124 Pacific Street -
Omana, PE
------- |