EPA-330/2-77-011
Emission Testing
at
Key no Ids Metals
Ph oenix, Arizona
(APRIL 19-20, 1977)
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
DENVER, COLORADO
AND
REGION IX i
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 1977
PRCi*
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Enforcement
EPA-330/2-77-011
EMISSION TESTING
AT
REYNOLDS METALS
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
April 19 and 20, 1977
June 1977
National Enforcement Investigations Center - Denver
and
Region IX - San Francisco
-------
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 2
III. PROCESS OPERATIONS 3
IV. EMISSION TESTING PROCEDURES 5
Sampling Locations 7
V. TEST RESULTS 10
APPENDICES
A Presurvey Inspection Report
B Production Data and Process Weight Calculations
C Stack Sampling Equipment
D Calibration Data
E Vol hard Method
F Chain of Custody Record
6 Particulate Field Data
H Analytical Results
-------
TABLES
1 Furnace Process Weights and Allowable Emissions 4
2 Station 7, Emission Data 11
3 Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride, Test Data 12
FIGURES
1 Reynolds Metals, Phoenix, Arizona, #7 Fluxing Station and
Sample Locations 8
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The Reynolds Metals Plant in Phoenix, Arizona, melts alloys and
fluxes aluminum scrap which is then used to manufacture a variety of
parts. One operation in the plant is the fluxing (degassing) of the
molten aluminum before the metal is cast. The metal is fluxed by bubbling
chlorine and nitrogen gas through the molten metal, during which the
chlorine reacts with other gases and carries them out of the metal.
On November 18, 1976, a pre-survey inspection (requested by EPA,
Region IX) was conducted by NEIC at the Reynolds Metals Plant [Appendix A]
to determine if EPA Method 5*sampling was feasible since fluxing is a
batch operation of short duration. It was concluded from the pre-survey
inspection that, if a sufficient number of ladles of aluminum were fluxed,
the tests could be performed.
On April 19 and 20, 1977, the fluxing emissions were source tested
by NEIC for particulates, chlorine and hydrogen chloride. Particulate
sampling and visible emission observations were performed by NEIC at the
No. 7 fluxing station (sampling Station 7) to determine compliance with
Arizona Article 3, Sections R9-3-306 (Process Industries—General )** and
R9-3-301, respectively. The chlorine and hydrogen chloride data were
determined for information only; Arizona has no regulations regulating
these pollutants.
Reynolds Metals and NEIC sampled the No. 7 fluxing stack simultaneously
using identical (Method 5) test procedures. Six runs were performed by
each entity.
* Code of Federal Regulations: Title 40, Part 60, Performance for New
Stationary Sources, Appendix Test Methods, June 8, 1976.
** The plant is located in the Phoenix-Tucson Air Quality Control Region
-------
2
II. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The fluxing particulate emissions averaged 0.72 kg (1.6 lb)/hr
which is less than that allowed by the Arizona process weight
regulation [9.9 kg (21.8 1b)/hr].
2. The fluxing visible emissions were in compliance during the
testing. Emissions averaged 0% opacity.
3. The chlorine emissions from the fluxing operation averaged 5.5 kg
(12.1 lb)/hr or 775 ppm (volumetrically). The hydrogen chloride
emissions average 1.23 kg (27 lb)/hr or 337 ppm (volumetrically).
There are no applicable regulations for these pollutants.
-------
3
III. PROCESS OPERATIONS
Processes at the Reynolds Metals plant include melting, alloying
and fluxing of aluminum used to extrude and fabricate aluminum parts.
Fluxing removes the dissolved gases in the aluminum before casting.
Molten aluminum is tapped (poured) from the reverberatory furnace
into a ladle of 4.1 m. ton capacity. A hood with gas pipes is placed
over the top of the ladle so that the gas pipes are submerged in the
aluminum. Then nitrogen and chlorine gas is bubbled through the aluminum
for 20 minutes. A fan draws the fluxing emissions from the hood and
out a stack on the plant roof. The particulate and gaseous emissions
are not controlled.
A reverberatory furnace taps metal only once every three or four
hours. To reduce the down time between sampling and to improve the
emission representativeness,* unfluxed ladles of aluminum were moved
to the No. 7 fluxing station from other furnaces. Moving of the ladles
is not standard procedure.
During a sampling run, two ladles were fluxed for 20 minutes each.
The ladles held an average of 3.6 m. tons (4.0 tons) of aluminum (80%
of maximum). The fluxing rate for the test periods are listed in Table 1.
The process data sheets and example process calculations are included in
Appendix B.
* Metal from more than one furnace was fluxed during the testing and
thus the variances in furnace metal are included in the test results.
-------
4
Table 1
FURNACE PROCESS WEIGHTS AND ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
Phoenix, Arizona
April 19 and 20, 1977
Weight of Metal
Sampling in Ladle Production Rate Allowed Emissions
Run No. m. tons tons m. tons/hr tons/hr kg/hr lb/hr
1
3.6
3.6
o o
*3" ^
10.9
12.0
9.8
21.7
2
3.8
3.2
4.2
3.5
10.5
11.6
9.6
21.2
3
3.6
3.6
o o
10.9
12.0
9.8
21.7
4
3.9
3.6
4.3
4.0
11.3
12.5
10.1
22.3
5
3.8
3.6
4.2
4.0
11.2
12.3
10.0
22.0
6
3.5
3.8
3.9
4.2
11.1
12.2
9.9
21.9
Average
3.6
4.0
11.0
12.1
9.9
21.8
-------
5
IV. EMISSION TESTING PROCEDURES
The testing at the Reynolds Metals plant followed EPA Method 5
procedures with one modification. Instead of distilled deionized water,
an alkaline-arsenite solution was used in the impingers primarily to
protect the sampling instrumentation from the chlorine and hydrogen
chloride, and also to provide chlorine and hydrogen chloride data about
the fluxing emissions.
The sampling train used was the Model AP 5000, manufactured by
Scientific Glass, Inc. [Appendix C] and configured as follows:
1. Stainless steel (316) nozzle - 0.64 cm
2. Glass-lined probe
3. Glass fiber filter - 5.1 cm diameters
4. First impinger - modified Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml alkaline-
arsenite solution
5. Second impinger - Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml alkaline-arsenite
solution
6. Third impinger - modified Greenburg-Smith, empty
7. Fourth impinger - modified Greenburg-Smith with approximately
200 of silica gel
Moisture content of the gas stream was to be determined by Method 4
(40 CFR 60) (i.e., the increased volume in the first three impingers and
the weight gain of the silica gel). But during the six runs no water
was collected and, in fact, in some cases impinger liquid was lost.
Based on previous experience with similar processes, and the low humidity
of the air in Phoenix, a moisture content of 0% was assumed.
-------
6
Stack gas molecular weight was based on the average analyses of
three grab samples collected during each run. Gas samples were obtained
by the Method 3 (40 CFR 60) grab sample technique and analyzed with
Fyrite* type combustion gas analyzers.
Six sampling runs, within the isokinetic range of 90% to 110%, were
performed. Prior to each run, the sampling train was leak-checked at 38
cm (15 in) Hg. At the completion of the run, a second leak check was
conducted at the highest vacuum recorded during the test. These checks
were acceptable as the leakage rate did not exceed 0.00057 m3/min (0.02
cfm). Probe and oven temperatures were held within 14°C (25°F) of 120°C
(248°F) during testing.
All pitobe assemblies, dry gas and orifice meters used in this test
had been calibrated prior to leaving Denver and were subsequently recali-
brated upon return [Appendix D],
An NEIC mobile laboratory, located on plant property, was used for
all sampling train preparation and sample recovery. Sample recovery
proceeded as follows:
1. All filters were placed in a storage container (petri dish) and
sealed with aluminum foil.
2. The nozzles, probes, cyclones and front portion of the filter
holders were washed with acetone. The acetone wash was collected
TM
in a glass jar which was covered with a Teflon -lined cap.
3. The contents of impinger 1 through 3 were measured. The contents
were then poured into a glass jar with a Teflon-lined cap. The
impingers and connecting glassware were rinsed with distilled water
and the rinse was added to the same jar.
* Brand name
-------
7
4. Impinger 4, which contained silica gel, was weighed and the silica
gel was discarded.
All samples were returned to the NEIC laboratories for analysis.
The filters and acetone washes were analyzed for particulate according
to the Method 5 procedures. The impinger catches were analyzed for
chlorine and hydrogen chloride by the Volhard method. The analytical
data and a description of the Volhard method are included in Appendix E.
Chain of custody was maintained at all times [Appendix F].
Sample Locations
NEIC and Reynolds Metals sampled the same stack at separate locations
[Figure 1]. The fluxing emissions are emitted from a stack 0.3 m (0.96
ft) in diameter and 5.4 m (18 ft) in height. The Reynolds test site was
located 2.4 m (8 ft) downstream from the NEIC test site and 2.2 m (7.3
ft) upstream of the stack exit. The NEIC test site was 5.4 m (18 ft)
downstream from a flow disturbance (blower). Thus, the Reynolds test
site was 8.3 diameters downstream and 7.3 diameters upstream of any flow
disturbance, and the NEIC test site was 18.5 diameters downstream and
8.3 diameters upstream of any flow disturbance.
According to Method 1, the minimum number of sample points (eight)
can be tested if the test location is more than 8 diameters downstream
and 2 diameters upstream of any flow disturbance. Subsequently, eight
points were sampled, four on a diameter as follows:
Point
Distance
cm in
1
2.1 0.81
2
7.1 2.8
3
21.1 8.3
4
25.9 10.2
-------
0.3m (1 ft)
REYNOLDS
AMPLE PORT
NEIC
JAMPLE port*
00
-------
Each point was sampled for 5 minutes for a total test period of 40
minutes.
Two 7.6 cm (3 in) sample ports were located on perpendicular
diameters at both test sites. The ports were kept sealed to avoid
interference with normal flow conditions.
-------
10
V. TEST RESULTS
The field data [Appendix 6] and particulate analyses [Appendix H]
for fluxing emissions (Station 7) are summarized in Table 2. The chlorine
and hydrogen chloride test data are summarized in Table 3.
Based on the test data, the particulate emission rate from the No. 7
fluxing station averaged 0.72 kg (1.6 lb)/hr. This is less than 10% of
the allowable particulate emission rate of 9.9 kg (21.8 lb)/hr.
The chlorine and hydrogen chloride emissions were determined for
information only. The chlorine emission rate (5.5 kg)/hr was 4.5 times
the hydrogen chloride emissions rate (1.23 kg)/hr [Table 3]. The
chlorine and hydrogen chloride concentrations were 775 and 337 ppm,
respectively. There are no chlorine or hydrogen chloride emission
regulations in Arizona, but employee (working area) guidelines have been
established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH).* The chlorine threshold limit value was set at
1 ppm (C,T)** and the hydrogen chloride value at 5 ppm (C).**
* Handbook of Laboratory Safety3 2nd Ed. 3 Norm Steer, Editor, The
Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, Ohio, 1971.
** A value with C is the recommended ceiling valuej a value with T is
a tentative value.
-------
11
Table 2
STATION 7t EMISSION DATA
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
Phoenix, Arizona
April 19 and 20> 1977
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6
Parameter (4/19) (4/19) (4/20) (4/20) (4/20) (4/20)
Volume Sampled (STP)+
ft3 23.63 23.28 26.24 26.12 24.96 26.32
1 668.73 658.82 742.59 739.20 706.37 744.86
Moisture
0
0
0
0
0
0
Barometric Pressure
cm of Hg
inch of Hg
73.025
28.75
73.025
28.75
73.33
28.87
73.33
28.87
73.25
28.84
73.2!
28.8'
Stack Gas Temperature
°F
°C
201
94
203
95
188
86
191
88
195
91
199
92
Molecular Weight
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
% Isolinetic
98.7
99.0
99.6
100.8
95.2
102.2
Stack Gas Velocity
ft/sec 41.0 41.0 44.0 43.5 44.3 43.8
jn/sec 12.5 12.5 13.4 13.3. 13.5 13.3
Volumetric Flow Rate (STP)
ft /min 1,365 1,360 1,500 1,476 1,503 1^467
.-{ii3/min 38.22 38.08 42.0 41.33 42.08 41.07
Particulate Collected (mg)
Acetone Wash 78.0 123.0 103.0 147.1 113.2 135.6
Filter 84.5 59.4 76.7 118.5 74.3 160.0
Total 162.5 182.4 179.7 265.6 187.5 295.6
Particulate Concentration
gr/SCF 0.106 0.121 0.105 0.156 0.116 0.173
mg/std m^ 243 277 242 359 265 397
Particulate Emissions
lb/hr 1.23 1.39 1.34 1.96 1.48 2.16
kg/hr 0.56 0.63 0.61 0.89 0.67 0.98
+ STP - Standard temperature 20°C (68°F) and pressure 76 cm (29.92 in) Hg,
Dry
tt Moisture assumed
-------
12
Table 3
CHLORINE AND HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TEST DATA
REYNOLDS METALS
Phoenix3 Arizona
April 19 and 20, 1977
Parameter
-1
Run No.
Sample Volume (STP)t
m3
Gas Flow Rate (STP)+
m^/mi n
Sample Collected (gm)
Concentration (PPM)*
Cl2
HC1
Emissions (kg/hr)
C1?
HC1
0.67 0.66 b.74 0.74 0.71 0.74
38.2 38.1 42.0 41.3 42.1 41.1
0.68+t
1.78
1.51
1.45
1.34
1.96
1.Oltt
0.25
0.35
0.49
1.00**
0.37
929
700
675
653
905
-
254
316
444
949**
333
6.17
5.12
4.86
4.79
6.49
-
0.87
1.19
1.64
3.58**
1.22
t Standard temperature 20°C (68°F) and pressure 76 cm (29.92 in) Hg3 dry
t+ A low concentration absorbing solution was used. The
arsenite solution was depleted during sampling causing
the results to be erroneous.
* Parts per million (by volume).
** Run 5t HCl result is felt to be an outliner, the result was
not included when calculating the averages.
-------
APPENDIX A
Presurvey Inspection of the Reynolds Metals Company
Phoenix, Arizona
-------
APPENDIX A
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
BUILDING 53, BOX 25227. DENVER FEDERAL CENTER
DENVER, COLORADO 30225
Chief, Field Operations Branch date. December 20, 1976
>m : Paul R. dePercin
ucct Presurvey Inspection of the Reynolds Metals Company, Phcenix, Arizona
On November 18, 1976, Messrs. Daniel Yee, EPA, Region IX; Gregory
Witherspoon, Maricopa County Health Department; and the writer inspected
the Reynolds Metal Company Plant, Phoenix, Arizona, to determine the
feasibility of performing source sampling. The process operations,
pollution control equipment and the emission sources were also investi-
gated.
The plant manufactures extruded aluminum parts. Melting, alloying,
annealing, drawing and cutting are performed during the processing.
The plant representatives contacted were Messrs. George Corfield,
Plant Engineer; Reed Bills, Senior Mechanical Engineer; and Gary Kilkelly,
Environmental Engineer, Central Engineering, Reynolds Metals Corp. Head-
quarters.
Process Description
Aluminum ingots are charged to one of seven natural gas-fired reverberatory
furnaces [Figure 1]. Each furnace has a melting capacity of 8.2 m. tons
(9 tons)/hour or melts 20.4 m. tons (22.5 tons) in two to three hours (one
heat). Each furnace produces a different aluminum alloy. The molten
metal is tapped into a ladle (4.1 m. ton capacity) where the alloy is
formed by the addition of trace metals. Slag (dross) is skimmed from
the surface of the ladle. If fluxing is necessary to reduce the magnesium
content of the aluminum, a hood with gas pipes is placed over the top of
the ladle with the pipes submerged in the molten aluminum. A gas mixture
of nitrogen and chlorine is bubbled through the aluminum for about 15 minutes.
When fluxing is complete the hood is removed and the slag is skimmed off.
Any aluminum contained in the slag is recovered. The hot slag is spun
in a preheated pot which forces the molten aluminum to coagulate at the
pot walls and run to the bottom. The aluminum is tapped off the bottom
of the pot and reused. The remaining slag is spread in the dross building
for cooling and then is loaded into a truck for shipment.
-------
PROCESS FLOW
REYNOLDS fiETAL CO.
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
RAW MATERIAL
STORAGE
7 MELTING FURNACES
Melting Emissions
to Stack
HOLDING LADLE
Fluxing Emissions
to Stack
INGOT CASTING
BILLET SAWS
BILLET STORAGE
EXTRUSION
REHEAT FURNACE
I SHAPES AND
Z7\ EXTRUDED TUBING
EXTRUSION PRESS
PRESS BLOOM
¦«—
FIGURE 1: Process Flow Diagram
Continued
-------
Shapes and
Extruded Tubing
| Heat Treat
Straightening \
Finish Saw
Inspection i
Stencil |
Oiling j
Packing
Shippi ng
xhf ¦ ¦
Press Bloom
Anneal ing i'
Tube P^dticer
Cleaning
Draw Bend
Painter
Heat Treat i
Straightening ^
Finish Saw
Cleaning
Inspection
Stenci1
Packing
Shipping
Figure 1 (Continued)
-------
-2-
The ladle pours the molten aluminum alloy into ingot "log" molds.
The "logs" are cooled and stripped from the molds and are then reheated
and cut as required before extrusion. An extrusion press forces the log
through a die forming the desired shape.
The extrusions receive a variety of heat treatments, bending, drawing
and cleaning processes [Figure 1].
Control Equipment Description and Operation
The melting furnaces (7) and the fluxing stations (7) exhaust gases
through 14 individual stacks [Figure 2]. Although these operations re-
present the major source of particulates, neither process has air pollution
control equipment.
The processes which have pollution control equipment are the slag
processing, the solvent cleaning bath and the woodworking shop. After
the aluminum is recovered from the slag, the slag is spread out to cool
in the dross building and is then bulldozed into a truck for shipment.
The dust and fumes from the dross building are drawn to a baghouse. The
baghouse uses dacron bags and is designed to handle 1,130 scm/min (40,000
scfm). The baghouse exhausts out a stack 1.5 m (5 ft) in diameter and
9.1 m (30 ft) in height.
The solvent that is vaporized from the cleaning bath passes over a
free board chiller* which returns most of the solvent to the system.
The solvent not recovered is vented from the bath through two exhaust
systems (one at each end of the cleaning bath). It is estimated that
25% or about 4,700 liters (1,250 gallons) of the solvent trichloroethane
is lost each month. There is no particulate control device.
The sawdust vacuum system collects the sawdust and woodships formed
while building the crates for the parts. The cyclone is 1.8 m (6 ft) in
diameter and 2.4 m (8 ft) in height. The cyclone outlet has a diameter
of about 1.2 m (4 ft), but has no stack. Instead, a rain cap protects
the cyclone outlet.
Source Sampling Feasibility
Furnace Stacks
The seven furnace stacks can be sampled using EPA Method 5. These
stacks are identical and the geometry is as follows:
* The free board chiller is a series of cooling coils at the rim of the bath
which condenses the hydrocarbon vapors.
-------
srbfrGj e.
O&Abs f & y
C*Le
f
S^wpusT
cycLc/je
Q
*o
boiie/i. STfictz
(i'*t ape A aT/i/p)
y
M
~r
fryvrt. e ^
fl < y&?o L&S fate c?T£L
Pkowfp.
EXTMSfe> fij
STACtzS
y
FLvx.
STACK?
ke4T
•t&ZAT
>• c ^ • 9 • « f 9
K » i « • ~ •••~
^aff'/C V 3 * 1
Fv£i\j$ceS
DRc s$
pfieTR c/tf/m e»T~
j5/jy k oore
STACK
-------
-3-
a) Stack inside diameter 0.9 m (3 ft)
b) Height 6 m (20 ft)
c) Wall thickness 11 cm (4.5 in)
Each stack extends about 6 m (20 ft) below the roof. The following
table lists information on the existing ports:
Furnace No.
Number of
Ports
Port Diameter
cm (in)
Height of Port Above
Roof m (ft)
1.
2
7.6 (3)
1.5 (5)
2
1
5.1 (2)
1.4 (4.7)
3
1
5.1 (2)
1.4 (4.7)
4
1
5.7 (2.25)
1.4 (4.7)
7
1
5.1 (2)
1.5 (4.9)
8
1
5.7 (2.25)
1.4 (4.7)
1
7.0 (2.75)
1.6 (5.4)
9
2
7.6 (3)
1.6 (5.3)
The furnace sample ports are about 5 stack diameters (4.6 m or 15 ft) up-
stream of the stack exit, and 2 stack diameters (1.8 m or 6 ft) downstream
of the transition between the rectangular duct (.8 m by 1.2 m or 2.7 ft by
4 ft) and to the round stack.
The emissions from the furnace stacks are primarily gases with temperatures
of 1,500°F. This high temperature will require the use of special equipment,
i.e. water cooled probes. Because of this larger ports, i.e., 12 to 16 cm
(5 to 6 inches) are required on all stacks.
The particulate loading from the furnace stacks is expected to be low
since only clean ingots are charged and no'alloying or fluxing takes place
in the furnace. Moreover, the individual furnace emissions are similar
despite the different alloys melted. For this reason, it is anticipated
that the total emissions could be estimated by testing two stacks. The
gas flow rates would be determined for each stack. It was noted during
the survey, however, that there were no visible emissions from the furnace
stacks although the plant was operating at capacity. Moreover, the Maricopa
County official indicated that on only one occasion had emissions been ob-
served from the furnace stacks and that was due to inadvertently charging
dirty scrap. The latter is not standard procedure and according to Company
officials is not a normal practice. In view of the above, it is doubtful
that source testing would reveal any significant emissions.
Fluxing Stack
Five of the seven fluxing stacks have been corroded away by the chlorine
in the exhaust gas. The old stack stubs will be replaced by stacks .3 m
(1 ft) in diameter and 5.5 m (18 ft) tall, identical to the two remaining
-------
-4-
stacks (Furnaces 1 and 7). The two existing stacks each have a single
port 1.4 m (4.7 ft) above the roof which is 7.6 cm (3 inches) in diameter.
The ports are 13.3 diameters upstream (4 m or 13.3 ft) of the stack exit
and 19.7 diameters downstream (6 m or 19.7 ft) of the stack transition,
an ideal location.
The gases emitted are primarily fluxing gases with dilution air.
The gas temperature will range from 100 to 200°F depending on the amount
of dilution air pulled into the fluxing hood, and the moisture will be
near ambient (0-5%). Emissions were not observed during the inspection.
Past source test results indicate the emissions contain particulate,
chlorine and hydrogen chloride. When pure chlorine was used to flux
the particulate emission rate was 1 kg (2.3 lb)/hr, much less than the
allowable 5.2 kg (17.1 lbs)/hr. The Company changed the flux gas since
this sampling which will increase the particulate emissions, but not
enough to cause an emission violation.
By sampling two stacks, a representative determination of the total
fluxing emissions can be made because the individual emissions are similar
despite the different alloys fluxed. The gas flow rates for each stack
would be determined. The time period could be lengthy (i.e., 4 hours)
because only a maximum of 15 minutes of testing can be accomplished while
a ladle is fluxed. At the present time sampling is not expected to result
in significant emissions.
Slag Baghouse
The baghouse stack is 1.5 m (5 ft) in diameter and 9 m (30 ft) tall.
From the point of breeching to the stack top is approximately 6 m (20 ft).
This stack can be tested using Method 5 but the following modifications
would be necessary:
1. Installation of 10 cm (4 inche) ports—two at 90° angles.
2. Installation of a platform guardrail and a ladder meeting
all safety requirements. The top of the guardrail will
need to be 51 cm (20 inches) below the centerline of the
sample ports. Padeyes (5 cm or 2 inches) will need to be
installed on the stabk about 1.7 m (5.5 ft) above the port
center.
To perform a test special operating conditions must be made because
the slag is processed on an irregular basis. There were no emissions
visible during the presurvey visit. This source is considered minor
because the baghouse very effectively controls the slag dust.
-------
Miscellaneous Emission Points
The sawdust vacuum cyclone is used irregularly. During the presurvey
visit no emissions were visible and no sawdust was noted in the area. The
cyclone outlet has no stack but is instead covered with a rain cap. To
perforin source testing would require a stack extension (at least 3 diameters
in length) and the use of straightening vanes. What effects these modifi-
cations v/ould have on a cyclone performance is unknown. Platforms, guard-
rails, access ladders and ports would also need to be installed. This
source, like the slag baghouse, is considered of minor consequence.
Emissions from the solvent cleaning bath represent a very minor
source of particulates. Gases from this source are exhausted through two
louvered vents. The vents which are located at the junction of a wall
and slanted roof cannot be sampled. The major pollutant emitted through
the vents is trichloroethane; however, no reference sampling method is
available to sample this hydrocarbon.
Summary and Conclusions
There are 5 areas in the Reynolds Metals plant which can emit pollutants
a) Furnace stacks (7)
b) Fluxing stations (7)
c) Slag baghouse
d) Sawdust cyclone
e) Solvent cleaning bath
The latter 3 are considered very minor. During the presurvey visit
no emissions were observed from the baghouse or the cyclone. The solvent
cleaning bath emits primarily trichloroethane. Source tests could be
performed on the slag baghouse stack and on the sawdust cyclone, but would
not be possible on the solvent cleaning bath. The slag baghouse and the
sawdust cyclone would require the installation of platforms, guardrails
and access ladders meeting all safety requirements. Ports would need to
be installed on the existing baghouse stack. The cyclone outlet would
require a stack extension, at least 3 stack diameters in length plus ports.
The 7 furnaces each have a stack. Tests could be performed on these
stacks, but modifications to the existing ports would be necessary. In
addition, because of high temperatures (1,500°F) special water cooled
probes would be necessary. Total emissions from the 7 furnaces could
probably be determined by particulate sampling on two stacks and obtaining
flow volumes from the others. During the presurvey visit no emissions
were visible and according to a Maricopa County air pollution control
official, emissions have been noted only once in the past and that was due
to the inadvertent charging with dirty scrap—a practice which is not normal.
-------
-6-
There are 7 fluxing stations, two of which presently have stacks. The
stacks for the other have corroded away and new ones will be constructed.
The two existing stacks can be source tested. Sample ports will need to
be installed; The short fluxing time of about 15 minutes would require
a lengthy sampling period, i.e., about 4 hours. Sampling of the two
stations should provide a representative determination of the total
emissions due to fluxing operations. Past source tests on the fluxing
stations indicated very low particulate emission rates, well below the
allowable limits. No emissions were visible during the presurvey visit.
Based on the available source test data, information obtained from
Maricopa County officials, and observations during the presurvey visit,
it is doubtful that source tests at the Reynolds plant would reveal any
significant emissions.
-------
APPENDIX B
Production Data and Process Weight Calculations
-------
APPENDIX B
PRODUCTION DATA
AND PROCESS WEIGHT CALCULATIONS
REYNOLDS METALS
Date Run Ladle Total Heel Alloy
(lb) (lb) (lb)
1
4-7
8,000
800
6,063
4-8
8,000
100
6,063
2
4-18
8,400
300
6,063
4-5
7,000
250
6,063
3
4-26
8,000
300
6,063
4-11
8,000
500
6,063
4
4-14
8,000
400
6,063
4-3
8,000
200
6,063
5
4-18
8,400
300
6,063
4-13
8,000
200
6,063
6
4-19
7,800
150
6,063
4-18
8,400
300
6,063
-------
PROCESS WEIGHT CALCULATIONS
For each run the total weight of metal from each ladle used was
added and then multiplied by 1.5 to obtain the hourly process weight.
The heel was not discluded from the process weight determination.
Example: Rm No. 1
Ladle 4-7 8,000 lbs for 20 minutes
Ladle 4-8 8,000 lbs for 20 minutes
Total 16,000 lbs for 40 minutes
Times 1.5 24,000 lbs for 60 minutes
or 12 tons/hr
-------
APPENDIX C
Stack Sampling Equipment
-------
APPENDIX C
STACK SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
i m
The Scientific Glass Model AP-5000 modular STAC-O-LATUR sampling
train consists of a control unit, a sampling unit and a vacuum unit.
The units are connected together with quick disconnect electrical and
air lines and umbilical cords.
The AP-5000 control unit contains the following:
1. Dual-inclined monometer (range 0-5" H2O) for indicating
the pitot tube velocity pressure and the orifice pressure
drop.
2. Temperature control for the oven and probe.
3. A flow valve and a bypass valve for adjusting sampling
rates.
4. Digital Temperature Indicator (DTI) which gives an instant
readout from six (6) points; stack, probe, oven, impinger
outlet, meter inlet, meter outlet by the use of a selector
switch.
5. Umbilical cords of 50 and 100 foot lengths which interconnect
the control and sampling units.
6. Communication sets are wired through control unit, umbilical
cord to the sampling unit.
The sampling unit is made up of three distinct sections; impinger
case, oven and probe. All three sections can be converted to form one
sampling unit or can be separated for unusual sampling conditions. Below
are the individual component descriptions:
1. Probe Sheath - Made of 316 stainless steel. The nozzle end
is packed with asbestos string. The ball joint (sampling
unit) end has a woven teflon 0 ring as packing material.
2. Probe Liner - 5/8" O.D. medium wall glass (pyrex) or stainless
steel (316) tubing logarithmically wrapped with nicrome heating
element, having a resistance of 2 ohms/ft. The liner is insu-
lated with fiberglass and asbestos with a type K thermocouple
imbedded for sensing the probe temperature.
3. Filter Frit - Porous glass frit (coarse) banded to silicone
rubber.
4. Oven - Fiberglass insulated capable of maintaining 120°C
(248°F) in cold weather (0°C).
-------
-2-
The vacuum unit (pump) is capable of drawing a high vacuum (50 cm Hg)
and a moderate volume (14 1pm) of air. The pump is rotary fiber vane
type which does not require lubrication, but oil bath filters are used
for pump protection.
-------
Dry Gas Meter Calibration by outside source
Control Module # ^ Make Of'
DGM Serial § iV/5 V-
Calibrated by '^7/^ On '/<>& ^
DGM adjusted (yes/no) A~"J
Calibration: JM OUT
Capacity Run 9;-7 > 99.7
Check (40%) Runy%Y ??.?
Personnel who obtained calibration c. y/q<-(h-j:
Date fen
-------
APPENDIX D
Calibration Data
-------
Date.
APPENDIX D
CALIBRATION DATA
Barometric pressure, Pb Hg
Box Nn, £T"~~
Dry gas meter No. ^ 7
Orifice
manometer
setting,
aH,
in. H20
Gas volume
wet test
meter
Vw.
ft3
Gas volume
dry gas
meter
Vd»
ft3
Temperature
Time
e.
min
y
AH@ U-i'
Wet test
Dry gas meter
Meter
tw»
°F
Inlet
*di»
°F
Outlet
*do»
°F
Average
td.
°F
0.5
-5-
SJ07
£ /
///<"
/• Lll
1.0
-5~
i77
-V
OGfi*
Calculations
AH
AH
13.6
Y
AH@
Vw Pb (td + 460)
0.0317 AH Rtw + 460) el2
vd(Pb + ,f"6) (tw + 460)
Pb (td + 460) L Vw J
0.5
0.0358
1.0
0.0737
2.0
0.147
4.0
0.294
err
*
0
0.431
8.0
0.588
Y B Ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry test meter. Tolerance = ± 0.01
AH@ = Orifice pressure differential that gives 0.75 cfm of air at 70° F and 29 92
Inches of mercury, in. H2O. Tolerance - ± 0.15
Figure 9. Suggested orifice and dry gas meter calibration and calculation form.
By:
-------
Orifice Meter Calibration
Date
SM
77
Box No.
^D
1.0
5
r./f
Sj>
"76
77
?¦)
l-GC,
2.0
10
/0.2-3
Vo
$
//5t-
/.£'
1-3
C?(c?>
&
i ??
f.35
/.o
/ 4,?
4.0
10
to 2 1
u* 3-
?7 i % <"
2)r
/c-
!-~>0
' • ^iveic-ac: i i
1/ c
/.t»7V
Calculations
AH
0.5
AH
13.6
0.0368
V... Pu (t,, + 460)
Vrf 160)
_ 13.6 _
U^o/S1
7^-
AH9
0.0317AH |Tt, + 460)0
Ph (tH+ 460) L. Vw -
, o/373/75^b-^-/
/
1.0
0.0737
!
U^IPH.I - nr>
LGWl.ot • < '
147 1 \mor^q _ .
2.0
¦ ex->or>0M"?< 9>e-j '-/*>7o.Vt'- A(,7
3.0
0.219
-r~
>33c,£% )L
~ /, Q
. ooooriK 0 'JoS'-l?) <41-1 (-j f ¦
4.0
0.294
/r?^-33-/
~~h~Q~
Where:
*8
TW
Id
Pb
e
Volume, wet test meter Calibration by:_
Volume Dry gas meter <^T>'
Temperature, Uet Test Meter Checked by: x'/
Temperature, Dry Gas Meter
Atmospheric Pressure, Inches Hg
Time, minutes
I
Remarks:
4/24/77
-------
Nat'onal Enforcement Investigations Center-Denver
Calibration Pi tot Tube: ID Number /iS /?> ij Cp Q c/ c/
Type-S Pi tot Tube ID Number: 3 - /
^ p
Standard
Pi tot
^P S-Type Pitot
c
Comments kfCi^
A leq
B leq
A
B
/•J*-
/- 9e
/ c/fi
6 n% i
0-1 %1
ftfc* »> t- k: i /?V
/. Hr S
/ $r<
o
r lcn
~
jr/y
/. J-o
/' >
n-VH
r icn
O. $3
/. ss
/, SS
6.VV'
(i w'
-
/. & £/ o
/). #/£
n>
(:> 11 3z
O, So S
/).S f o
c XV'
,H 1 ' c. yc> —
r> .sos
n
o.??7
0 • lcf 7
0 ./I
a. / c/o
O. /1<
O IV
e Tn
<- U
& /<"
•
~
/
/
6 mi
omf
Leg Average Cp -.i; -
probe sheath attached ^ S
nozzle attached
sampling
Performed By:
Calibration Date: Z "
-------
Ug—iTTvironm^ntai Protection Arjency APPENDIX D , , q *
National Enforcement Investigations Center-Denver . -
Calibration Pitot Tube:ID Number K) S Cp ft >c1°l
Typc-S Pitot Tube ID Number: ^ - 1
A p
Standard
Pitot
aP S-Tvpe Pitot
Cp
Consents
A leq
B leq
A
B
l.'iO-
2-15
¦3:15
)vv.y 1/ "tov. i-v-^ I
Q-15
J.IS
/¦? ~ - ¦>'
+ 1
*i » ^ .1
Lcu.4 I ^v^i) 2^, Qu
1. °I0
2-IS
3-~?S
6 - '
¦J -V
Vvv/w.
I ^
I. "IS"
1
» *7,7 r
. —1 •
*
') -\s
I- "19
-7:i;
» 1 "
•
I lo
—1-
M5
—* c*
t
7,
1 30
Olil
f> 75*7
•
•1 -2>o
1. 3o
0* :-s7
4.75-7
•
nns
1.
1. _3£
r ^£7
^¦7^7
;
0 > <-l
^ * b> ~S 5
a ?7?
d. ?7^
f) , b
W ?7o
4 7;/
»
ft. <\
/9-^S
, -773
11 <
n »+3e
<0 dot;
6 .'^dS '
0 • ??/;
~fo) i'c. y~V — VVWct, ^ ^
0
•> "V ^
/n •
< , ~ ,
Performed By:_ _ Calibration Date:_ jt»J'3i. /ir,r
-------
APPENDIX E
Vol hard Method
-------
APPENDIX E
VOLHARD METHOD
Deterr.ination of'Chlorine and Kydroehlorie Acid in Stack Gas
Solutions and Reagents:
1. Distilled-deionized water (DI H2O Chloride Free)
2. Alkaline arsenite solution (l.O N MaOH + 0.1JJ KaAsO^:
Dissolve UO grams of NaOH and 6.5 gm NaAs02 in DI H2O
and dilute to 1000 nl with DI H^O.)
3- Alkaline arsenite solution (2.5 N NaOH and 0.5 N RaAsO^:
Dissolve 100 gm of NaOH and 32.5 em of NaAs02 is DI HgO
ond dilute to 1000 rvl with DI H2O)
It. Ferric alum indicator (Dissolve 28.0 gm of ferric ammonium sul-
fate FeNlii^SO^ )2'12 H20 in 70 ml of hot DI H2O. Cool and
filter. Add 10 nil of concentrated HHOj and dilute to 100
ml with DI HgO.
5- Nitric acid 8.0 N (Add 100 ml of concentrated HNO^ to 100 ml
of DI H2O. Boil until colorless and store in a glass bottle.
6. Silver Nitrate solution O.^*
(Dissolve 17.0 gn of AgNO^ Tn water and dilute to 1000 ml.
Store in an amber bottle. Standardize this against 0.1II NaCl
solution using Volhard.
7. Amnonium Thiocyanate 0.1N*
(Dissolve 8 gm of I.'H^CNS in DI H2O and dilute to 1000 nl.
vith DI HpO. Standardize this against the AgNOo solution using
Volhard.)
8. Sodium Chloride O.lli*
(Dissolve 5•8U6 gm of dried NaCl in DI HgO and dilute to 1000
ml with DI H20
9- Reagent Nitrobenzene
10. Starch solution (I2 indicator)
(Make a paste of 1 gn soluble starch in cold water. Dilute
to 100 ml with boiling water.)
11. Standard iodine solution
(Dissolve 12.69 gm of reagent grade I2 crystals in 25 grp. o~
iodate free KI and 100 nl with DI ^0. When completely in
solution, dilute to 1000 ml with DI H2O. Store in an anber
bottle.)
12. Sodium bicarbonate (Reagent grade HoHCO^)
* 0.01—Normal solutions nay need to be prepared for HC1 and CI2
concentrations of less than 1000 ppa.
-------
Sampling Train:
HEATED AREA
FILTER HOLDER
THERMOMETER
CHECK
VALVE
STACK
WALL
=1
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
PITOT MANOMETER
VACUUM
LIME
CYCLONE
ICE BATH
Figure II-18
1. Impinger (l) and (2) each to contain 100 ml of standard
alkaline arsenite solution. Measure accurately with 100 ml
volumetric pipette. If the water content of the gas stream
z is low,add 100 nl of DI HgO to each impinger. Weigh and
label each.
2. Impinger (3) is dry. Impinger (U) to be filled j to 3/h
with silica gel. Weigh and label each.
Sampling Procedure:
Sample for approximately 20 minutes at a sampling rate of 0.5 to 1.0
cubic feet per ninute. (For concentrations of ::C1 or Cl2 of 1000 ppm
or less,use the weaker solution of alkaline arsenite.)
1. When sampling is completed, allow train to cool. Remove
collected materials from prohe and cyclor.e by ringing with
distilled water and collect washings in a one liter polyethylene
bottle.
2. Dry and weigh all impingers and log weights. The weight increase
is water and absorbed HC1 and Cl?. Transfer the contents of
impingers (l) and (2) into separate clem polyethylene bottles.
Wash out the impingers with DT water being" careful not to
spill anything,and add the washings fror impinger (l) to the
bottle with the catch from impinger (l) etc. A Polyethylene
vash bottle is convenient for washing the impinger tip and
tube. (The excess sodium arsenite must be titrated with IP
solution where HC1 and Cl2 are both present in the same stream.
Spillage or loss of any solution will cause high results.)
Carefully label each bottle for impinger number, test number,
date, etc. '
-------
3. At the laboratory dilute the solution in each bottle to an
exact, known volume with DI water. Be sure to rinse the bottle
with DI water. Titrate total chlorides using the Vo]hard
Chloride Titration Method. Titrate the excess oodium arsenite
by titrating with Ig solution. (The aliquot size needed for
best accuracy can be determined by ttying a small aliquot.)
Procedure A: Analysis of Hydrogen Chloride
Pipet an aliquot of the sample into a 250-rJ Erlenmeyer flask. Add
25 ml of water, 5 ml of 8 N nitric acid and swirl to mix. Depending
on chloride content, add 0.1 N or 0.01 N_silver nitrate from a buret until
the silver chloride formed begins to coagulate. When coagulation occurs,
add an additional 5 ml of silver nitrate. Add 3 ml of nitrobenzene
and 2 ml of ferric indicator. Snake or stir vigorously to coat all ,
precipitated silver chloride with nitrobenzene. Back-titrate with
0.1 N or 0.01 II arar.ononium thiocyanate until the first appearance of
the reddish-bro'.m Fe(CKS)6~3 coirplex. .A blank determination for chloride
in the absorbing reogent should be run simultaneously and subtracted
lVom the sample results. Fro-n the titer of I.V^CI.'S solution, as deter-
mined previously by titration against standard AgN'O., solution, using
ferric alum us an indicator, calcalate the net volume of AgNOj required
for precipitation of the chloride.
Calculations:
((ml AgnO, XN AgtI0,)-(ml NfyCIISx N KH^CHS)] XO.O36 = grams of HC1 in
aliquot, (a blanh titration should be conducted containing the same
amount of u-.used alkaline arsenite absorbing solution. Subtract this
value (if any) from final results).
Procedure B: Analysis of Hydrogen Chloride in the Presence of Chlorine
Pipet an aliquot of the sarple into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask and
proceed with the Volhard titration for total chlorides as described
under Procedure A. A blank determination for chloride in the absorbing
reagent (alkalinc-arsenite reagent) should be run simultaneously and
subtracted from the sample results. Calculute the total grams of chloride
as above but with a factor of 0.03b rather than O.O36.
Pipet another aliquot of the sample into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. Add
a few drops of phcnolphthalein indicator, neutralize carefully with
concentrated hydrochloric acid, and cool. Add sufficient solid sodium
bicarbonate (NaWCO,) to neutralize any excess hydrochloric acid, then
add 2 to 3 g more. Add 2 nil of starch indicator and titrate with
0.1 N iodine solution to the blue endpoint. For the reagent blank,
determine the number of ml of 0.1 N I2 requiied to titrate 25 ml of
alkaline-arsenite absorbing reagent, as described above.
-------
Calculations:
ml Arsenite solution in aliquot = ml aliquot X 100 ~ sample volume
^~(ml arsenite solution in aliquot X N NoASO^) - (ml 1^ solution X
N T^YJ * 0-035 = gms Cl^ in aliquot)
100 ml - mlj Nj mls
0.035 a = gra Clg in sample
ols n^
gm HC1 in sample = 3^ /~gw total chloride in sample - gm chlorine in sampl
35
References:
Atmospheric Emissions from Hydrochloric Acid I'anufacturjng Processes,
U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service,
National Air Pollution Control Administration, Durham, IJ. C., pp.38-39>
1969, Publication No. AP-51*-
-------
APPENDIX F
Chain of Custody Record
-------
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office Of Enforcement
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
.URVEY
o
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
.^1
STATION
NUMBER
STATION LOCATION
DATE
TIME
sample tv'pe
SEO
NO
NO OF
CONTAINERS
/
ANALYSIS
REQUIRED
Water
Air
Comp
Grab
„ ~r
c f r~r/r / A")
^ 6 _s
/
X
(
I
S •! ft, r ( • / --
y •' J ^ f fs sr* c ^
/ •'
/i
/t/lfj
/
A"
1
(
1,
t
/l
//
X
!
a >•/?1 r .! w T<
1 . r /> ' /i
t > '
ll
¦y.
.<
<"
3
i
i
11
t>
-- .. ' r^TTr /,
/'
/->/[
/-
/
2
(
'¦ 4 / A.
a
/—. / r ? A")
1A7
t' ; i
Y
,/
?
s
1
Csfr
'i
r. * * , - Af ^
!
)
/C
~7
J
!
;/
/
.7 A. /" -*r? '.V7v ^
h
x'
/
?
i
l
^ ."a /-*
/'
/ t
/r,/T^ *1/ A")
.'7
• X
If
f
J * r A f r
/'
'i' -»
H
/J 7/
vf
V
(
it
t'r
-Zz. , - re—rn^c>{
/'
1-2}
a
V
f
/"/i /
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office Of Enforcement
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
iURVEY
- 'Z ,¦. "2 -r- p.
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
'f? r *
^ ?7.s .
STATION
NUMBER
" 1 u s ' ¦ ¦ ¦
STATION LOCATION
DATE
TIME
sample type
SEO
NO
NO OF
CONTAINERS
ANALYSIS
REQUIRED
Water
Air
Comp
Grob
z-/ ^ <- A-, ')
/''/
V
,v
/
i
« ¦> s.. i' (
/
/
U/r
„ ~
/?
y
X
/
A,/«,' / v/ r
b
<• s .» r C
(t
)v y
X
X
/
t*
1
1
//
/!
^ s- s!~?r /<
A
/7/?
/
/
V
i
/
/ > ~
/" V cA'"-1 v'
- VJ--X - • -
r?ia,.hr99?
- A.A-,
ar
x
/
/y/S f *--r
0£a.~>c
) t ' T/ ' ^ ^ // /• t " —....
A7
—
y<
X
;
/
¦ ' .
' /
Dale/Time
Date/Time
Relinquished by: (Signatu.-e)
Received by: (Signature)
Date
/Time
Relinquished by: (s.gnofur»;
Received by Mobile Laboratory for field
OnalySIS: (Signature)
Date/Time
Dispatched by: (Signature)
Date/Time
1
Received for Laboratory by:
Date/Time
Method of Shipment:
/
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (SrgnofuraJ
Relinquished by: fSignafu re)
Received by: (Signature)
Distribution: Orig — Accompany Shipment
I Copy—Survey Coordinator Field Files
CPO est - 464
-------
APPENDIX G
Particulate Field Data
-------
Plant_
Run No.
Location_ (0 h C)~7
Date A,.'! 1*7 /C/V
n;u _ eld
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Ambient Temp #F_
£*
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture Z H)
Operator_
Time:
J-
jL
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No._
Meter A H_
C Factor /)/ 7 ^
Start Time_ j3£JjzJS-/3 Probe Tip Dia. In. ,'2 *11
End Timd_
//a? - Pitot Tube Ho. -3 7
Probe Length/type_
A
Filter No.^' / ,
A- Pf ^ '54
£ • M
i r,.*-)
c IflS
) <=> r-
n - •
L
^/2-3C o, o ;£
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
m-M
Pitot
in. H-0
AP
Orifice AH
in H20
Dry Cas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. l!g
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
°F
Probe
Ter.p.
°F
Stack
Temp.
"F
Stack
Temp.
CF
("F+460)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
/) Ll
5
"U> LnO
A / f
/-?C
/o?
/oh
,# f
/o° ,
.?£$
/££
' P
3
; o
9 r/
/•J?'/
/CO
c)9
e/0
,/"
JJI
Cc) u
k" (Zb
• C/O
c *
/£ '
- <3 /
eft*
, . J-
J
J3 US
(¦
, '< ft
° /
K c
K Ot>
5/ (j/A/j
Lai/'f.
1
i
1
Comments:
r-,,rn * £ /jip c. -• OfH3<> e. ¦/?.£¦ pe
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant: U lVU-k/* ^ Date: /f/" / Z?-7/7
AddrcssTT" p/Lr.. ¦ * Operators: r-1//
Station No.: nGol : -
Run No.: / Ambient Temperature: 7<' Sample Box Number: /
Impinger 1 ^ /u ^
Final Volume *?(' ml of
Initial Volume /&° ml
Volume collected ml
Impinger 2
Final Volume /w^
Initial Volume / 0 G ml
Volume collected o ml
Impinger 3
Final Volume ml of
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected^ / ml
Impinger v
Final Voluftte^ ml of
Initial Volume^^ ml
Volume collected
Impinger
Final weight "7Q5~~ gm of $¦ A ^ <9? /
Initial v/e i g h
Weight collected gm
Total Volume Collected ml
Filters
Weight
No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected
p?"— / gm gm gm
gm gm gm
Cleanup performed by
-------
RtCOHO OF yiSUAU detewiiwtiok of OPACITY
CQMPAHY fij
10CATIQM ^hp^oi^ , 4r>\-zro^
TEST NUKBtR
DATE (J- Z/9/7-7
TYPE FACILITY
Cyri'Py^c--
COinROL DEVICE
PAGc_
HOURS OF 03SEIVVAT50?L^iifr_/£lE-
03SERVER
^ ¦¦¦> /—¦¦ Vf 7—-—»
OBSERVER CERTIFICATION DATE ^/^c/l~?
03SERVER AFFILIATION Q<* f-pP
POINT Or EMISSIONS «c\C
HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE POINT ?C>'
CLOCK TIMS
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
Direction frcm Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
MATHER CONDITION'S
Wind Direction
Wind Speed
Ambient Temperature
SKY CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
PLUME DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
OTHER INFORMATION
Initial
Final
3±>"
-><- hi
Wo ^
(0.en
Cut&a-C
' &n
7
-iU-rTi\a
<\
-------
COXWY feu.or/c/<', r/Z(joi>/oi -ft^03SERVER -/ „
LCCATIC'i / /i^V^^'TYPE FAClLlTY^v-/^.
TEST HU'<2C..1 r<-.C'-s -¦**-/ *
WE <*/! V/So
OBSERVATION RECORD
POINT CF MlSSlWiS
202c
M!n.
S
*
*
STEAM f'LU.'lE
(ch?c'< 1 f ami 1cab1t>)
CC.'!KEflTS
IV.
21;
cd
iict.ichcd
t 0
fi
L? . >
('>
1 1
( >
r-
1 2
( '
< '
r 1
! 3
<"5
/ J
1 /
1 <
C) C >
b
7
H
c,
1'J
n
1^
13
1
K
Ijs
1
16
17
; ,1
19
i')
1
cl
!
\i?
21
2i
\'j
/(>
?/
?fi
29
* .
CCSERYATIOH RECORD
(Continued)
PACE CF ,
COMPANY
LOCATION
TEST !Hr.3tT
DATE ___
OBSERVER
TYPE FACIL1TV
POlflT OF EHlSSTftiT
Sncords
STEAM HLU.'.E
'cSock 1 f anillc.ible)
CO'WENTS
llr.
KM.
0
IS
30
¦14
Attached
Oo tacncd
30
31
??
33
.(1
3'j
3"6J
37
3a
'H
10
¦u
< 1
...»
45
••¦r.
47
19
5 0
5 1
5?
53
5$
55
00
5?
59
irn Do; 74-20150 Filed U-11-74.0.4J ua|
rrotm reciter, vol cp, no. 219—.tu^day, novembhs 12,1974
-------
RECORD OF yiSUAU DETroilWNOH or OPACITY
POMPiK? £!L>r*<^vr^\
LOCATION rAe.e
TEST KUMCER O(o t
date: a / (9/ 77
£& /
TYPE FACILITY *-/#?, ,'VO^M'vo)"
COilTROL DEVICE
PAGE,
HOURS OF OBSEWATIOfD
cf
/ r
21
OBSERVER
OBSERVER CERTIFICATION DATE '-i/'lo/l 1
OBSERVER AFFILIATION lX r.'f
POIIIT OF EMISSIONS ^
'<'>
HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE FOINT
'O'
CLOCK TIME
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
Direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
MATHER CONDITIONS
Wind Direction
Wind Speed
Anbient Temperature
SKY CONDITION'S (dear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.y
PLUME DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
OTHCH I.'IFOOTIOII
Initial
¦ Final
j5_£"
fsoCtX
4o
Y&cO
'dC -
h hi-
/
U-> h
-------
CCV?AS'Y
n
OBSERVATION RECORD
s—ZAGE
L-V. U.
OF.
LC^T'.C; ,
V
. *
. A o F\TYPE FACI11TyTO>--/>v.
1 EST
»(•»*•» T\
IV .»CI<
f
,L /
1
pr. -
£_
POIJIT CF E.M,ISSiCliS l-ir
CATE
'///<-*• /' ~
' ^
".In.
Seccn^s
STE,VI I'LU.'iE
(chec"'. 1f applicable)
Hr.
u
1 3
*• 5
/.IJCi iii
Pci.ichet;
COMMENTS
0
(1
2
1 3
1 <
5
o
7
H
<;
l'J
l'l
12
13
I
1."
lj
1 1
16 i
1
17
19
;U
d I
27
rL3_j
2i
; 0
(h
71
29
. i •
OBSERVATION RECORD
(Continued)
PAGE OF
COMPANY
LOCATION
TEST liir.alT
DATE
OBSERVE*
TYPE FAC1UTT7
POIIlT OF EMISSlcTiT"
o
Hr.
H
n
t 1
(>
/'V
31
/ •>
r 1
O
r1.
33
LL
r~>
Cl
/">
.C?_
( >
-n
(>
14
3'j
r>
r ;
( J
rf
r >
/¦ 1
3b
37
30
34
">.0
•11
1^1
CJ
ai
15
i(>
c.7
A'l
n
so
11
.
r>?
sr
S4
5>5
56"
5/
58
69
[rn ooc.?4-2oiso pu«i ii-ii-74;o:«j «o]
rroixAi wcirTE2, vol a?, no. 219-.tu::day, novsmbk 12,1974
-------
Plant
Run No.
dw/A /Met*
I UL.. !LD
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Ambient Temp *F fi ^
Location
bate
J/)'?/??
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Bar. Press. "Hg
^ 7r*
Operator_
Time: Start
End
Time •fyi-lP*1
Time /£ SC,- / 7/6
zl
J-
J
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Meter A H /' & %
C
«¦
Pltot Tube No. 2^ ^
Probe Length/type —^
Filter No. ,
Factor (*) •
^(S so &..« ris&c &/¦£"A - o-a ^
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
3-u &
Pltot
In. H-0
AP
Orifice AH
In H20
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
"Implnger
Temp.
6F
Oven
Temp.
* F
Probe
Temp.
•f
Stack
Temp.
"F
Stack
Te-ip.
°F
("F+460)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
M
3V7. &
0«/>
/ A?
/-A>
/^y
?7 ,
JS*?.
^5V
655
*>
io
/ i-T
/ ^
/^/
J7 *
t"
a; 7
C^7
a
/$'
±SLp'V6
0 -
f f".%r
-MJ
i *t*>*
?^i-6'!
'
/t
/s>>
//(v
?.o
/6 f
J
X
f*
310,4?
b> 6V>
J c->
/
/**
ch<>
/o 7
/
'¦« "/
~
O, GC
-
hg.<
/L4o
Comments:
V O
' O %<
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant: ^ Date: /Ps--- ^ ' % /9?^
Add res sT Opera tors: /j?/^ ~
Station No.: & 7 J_
Run No.: S "2. Ambient Temperature: £
Barometric Pressure: Sample Box Number:
9( . „ /
Final Volume /ccrrr-J^ m] 0f ///^ q /}, fJ}j /J^ /j^O
Initial Volume ,*¦£¦+*¦£ ml **~
Volume collected —y ml
Impinger 2
Final Volume /co ml of
Initial Volume / ml
Volume collected o ml
Impinger 3
Final Volume O ml of
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected ^ ml
Impinger
Final VolumeP^^-v^ ml of
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected ml
Impinger
Final weight <£ T^. ° gm of S> ^ ^
Initial weight /-7^'r gm
Weight collected /C. ^ gm
Total Volume Collected — 3 ml
Filters
No.
Final Height
gm
gm
Tare Height
Weight
Collected
jgm
gm
jgm
jgm
Cleanup performed by
on
-------
COMPANY.
LOCATION
TEST NUMBER
DATE
KECORO- OH yISUAU^detcrhhwiok of opacity
fit-
r~J*horz-^yy-, £\n.
PAGc
Cf_
OOO'I
p~~
TYPE FACIL2TY_
CONTROL DEVICE
~> ( ^
/Oo
'HOURS OF OBSERVATION
-— .VATIOK-^
OBSERVER -tCV T-jich^fc.
r ¦ iT.pr ,11 ¦ ¦ ¦ !•
OBSERVER CERTIFICATION DATE -:>/
POINT OF EMISSIONS
'HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE POINT -PC
^ f
CLOCK TIMS
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
"Direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
MATHER CONDITIONS
Wind Direction
Wind Speed
Anblent Temperature
SKY CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, ctc.y
PLUMS DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
OTiina uiFooTion
Initial
Final
3£'
sc'
f/focf)
-T\
CCcr\)
ftn.i-Ly
Kt
frrti-y
£L10,
( ~
-------
COXWY
LCCAT1CN »—/>* / x~->< >. , r)fl jcvj/1
TlST i;:j'tf-.H r->( , '
PATE ^//V / 7 7
OBSERVATION RECORD
OBSERVER
-j' ¦j .
TYJ>E FACIUTTT
POINT CF EHISSICTF
^PAGE, OF, .
y-iMc i-
Secenri
3
STEAM f'LU.'iE
{ch;c''. 1f applicable)
COMMENTS
III*.
".in.
u
1 =
30
ib
At C C i"r (J
i)ei.iched
I 0
1 I
1 2
t 3
1 <
5
6
7
H
u
10
11
1?
13
1
K
15
10
17
'i-"1
IS
2U
L_t ' L_
i' L_
1
rii
t~
;rj
/ii
?/
?s
23
1 *
CBSERVATION RECORD
(Continued)"
PACE OP
COffAW
LOCATION
TCST IIUKUnr
DATE '
OBSERVER
TYPE FAClLlTV
POINT OF ErtlSSlftnr
O
llr.
Mil.
Sscords
STEAM t-Lu.'.f
fc'iecV If acwUcable)
CO'WcNTS
0
14
3'J
Attached
Uoucnod
1 30
31
3?
33
,ii
3T
36,
37
3>1
—
*N
"10
•11
A?
f. i
-11
15
¦•r,
<7
CH
( >
r )
ft .•
«0
cjO
> - ¦
< •
<_>
r»
/< •
f *
f •
f '1
Cj.
( )
.ylL
•>'/
r >
7™5"
/ ->
r>
S3
< ^
< 1
f.
1
SI
IS
Of!
'>/
sa
so
irr. Doc.14-20150 FUMl 11—1X—74,8:4S wa)
rrorsAi rjecjstes, vol 3?, no. 219—.tuzsday, November 12, 1974
-------
Plant £
V-
1 ULA
VERY IMPORTANT
JLD
TILL IN ALL BLANKS
Ambient Temp *F
&
Run No
. '"3
Location
Date
o 6^7
A?*./ J&' J?7?
Operator
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Timo^.-^3S ~ ^
End Time ?"/6 " / ^QO
Bar. Press. "Hg % 7
Assumed Moisture Z o
Probe Tip Dia. In. /O, s^*/ ^
Pitot Tube No. "* /
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
a
Probe Length/type
3'/g/<
«SS
2-
Meter A H /' 6 V
C Factor {) ¦ '?O ^
Filter No
. z
7
r C
<2. Q/7 *
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
^s
; -k
93
c/3>
H
oW
/6S
Oc7
/)¦£(>
/ ^
/vf
6/6
9c
? ¦ 2(t
#.76 i0-76
9*
&£
vr^
$ct
JO
. J
/u /
6W/
r,/< CXyS- '
?,r-
a-a <¦
I 7 c/>c
'1
SI
t
I
R- V
$7
/>£d
96
/oo
;/o
7*
'JO
'-J&
/,f6'
q$, )o
/.££ yts
?>o
1 I
7
U 11 - "71
^¦55
/$£ /&
//
/^0
7 oS \/-o<
*7
/C's
7°
J>^/
2 I*
1—
6s .
l0(
. I ^
i, IA C^ t /' ^
V_T"
- <7
6>Of
c/^
I
i
I
I
!/o3l
''6?Of(r'/L^
-
^0
i
Comments
• O,' / ch^
r r' /-J 7.
~V,.
n
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant: /^ Date: ^^ ^
AddressT // //> ^~. Operators: /j^/^^
Station No.: c6?o7 :
Run Mo.: Ambient Temperature: &o
Barometric Pressure: J f %'6- Sample Box Number:
Impinger 1
Final Volume ?Q ml of /$//( C
Initial Volume /o o ml
Volume collected —/c .ml
Impinger 2
Final Volume fO ^ ml of
Initial Volume / ml
Volume collected o ml
Impinger 3
Final Volume / ml of
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected y ml
Impinger
Final Vfrigme
Initial VoiLTme^
Volume collected
ml of
Impinger
Final weight £1} • O gm of $¦ //0> ^ ^
Initial weight r> gm
Weight collected 7 > r~ gm
Total Volume Collected f, ml
Filters
No.
Final Weight
3
gm
_gm
Tare Weight
Weight
Collected
gm
jgm
jgm
jgm
Cleanup performed by
on
-------
KECORO OF VISUAL DETONATION Of OPACITY
P«
aGc
cf
COMPAKY_
LOCATION
TEST NUMBER
DATE
Lprv), _3U>v
/X f ArzS> 2-s.->
OC*c>~?
3>
y/rxc.V^7
TYPE FACILITY
cornROL DEVICE
o>o
/Oo-
HO'JRS or OBSERVATION
OBSERVER ^V-
21
03SERVER CERTIFICATION DATE
03SERVER AFFILIATICH L.^
POINT OF EMISSIONS
-i?!3
*Ch
HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE POINT 1<\'
CLOCK TIME
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
Direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
VicATHER CONDITIONS
Kind Direction
Wind Speed
Anbient Temperature
SKY CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
PLl'ME DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
OTllta INFORMATION
Initial
Final
-;/r
Ci^cC)
a O
(riocf)
Ct£r)a
CLz f*/?
*" r'
5h_> < yi-1 >
O 'jfcli
o
&-->
-------
OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE OF
COv.?AVY K^.o^cl^, i^OPSERVER OM /-X2oJVX ^
LCCATIC'l R-,'.r^.v ^Fo^ivTYPE fKlLHV -* ,vC.v-, • ^'l),vJC
TEST Ii'JXJlK <•;>>, / '.--<• "H FOl.'IT CF EMISSIONS U:
EATS
OBSERVATION RECORD PACE OF
(Continued)
COXPAVY OBSERVER
LOCATION 7YPE FACILITY
TEST JilKSER POIMT OF EMISSIONS
DATE ¦
Seconds
ilirb I'lume
(ch?c'< 1f ?pr>l1cable)
COMMENTS
Hi*.
".in.
0
15
3fi
MltCCi c0
T'c inched
1 0
l 1
| 2
1 J
1 <
1 5
I
6
i
7
1'
t,
10 i
11
U
M
i
l:
15
L _ _
10
1?
".•!
19
>u
-l
i?
I
: 3
a
;o
('0
?/
y:i
23
1 '
Mr.
I-Un.
Seconds
£TEA!i ku.'.t
(c'ipcV If applicable)
co:wents
0 1 15
j'j
'15
Attccncd
Detacnod
I 33
31
3?
j3
.i)
35
3iT]
37
3M
3>i
<0
«
•11
U_
i
c '
f >
< >
w< , *
TT
*
l£
)
i'.r
15
r'i
Y
T<
r
r'.
H
( ^
( /
n
o
?>
. r.
?
53
07
5B
SO
1
jrn Doc 74-20130 riled ll-l l-7-J.U.44 ami
KDEJtAt RICirTES, VOU 3?, NO. 319-.TUES!>AY, NOVEMBER 12, 1974
-------
SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:—cl <- Date: -?
Address: 7.^ ^ ^ Operators: ' '
Station No.: nr- c~? :
Run No.: Ambient Temperature: per
Barometric Pressure: jr. K7 Sample Box Number:
Impinger 1
Final Volume /c / ml of /)LK
Initial Volume /0^ ml
Volume collected / ml
Impinger 2
Final Volume f^ ml of tc\
-------
•5-k
Plant f^lxx-y)\
Run No. ^
Locatlon_ Pho£^nW. /?J?'7£.sA
bate_ tf/l?-o/->"p
rS^W-XpA A.
cut IEL!
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Ambient Temp *F
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Bar. Press. "He
Assumed Moisture Z O
Operatox
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Meter A H
Time: Start Tlme_
End Time
///£>
Probe Tip Dla. In. ¦ M/
/.03/
:W
2-
O
/'
Pitot Tube No.
Probe Length/type ¦^""3 C.~Lr\'Z/\?
Filter No. ,7'V V ¦
C Factor O. /Of
tt
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
9/C-&
Pltot
In. H-0
AP
Orifice AH
In H20
Dry Gas Temp.
"F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
"F
Probe
'fenp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
°F
("F+460)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
3 /
X
i//9 f?-
. M
8#
^9
3 O
77
7 <^3
7A
L?o
/o
Vtt'S.5"
'•7/
'¦?
/¦?
3'c> -T7
5" O
(,0
7hl
777
L-l 7
.2.
/C
mi,
f.G?
Po
7?
6 O
75"
7^0-
6^-5
/
£o
fjf.13
.
O>
r-oz
Comments:
-------
COM?AKY ^ t-^S At u>/U.
10CAT TO\\ P A#-l~2-
TEST m\mf)£?Q7
DAT E e~
ST ^
C.UA
(%lj
ZD*
fff
UP-
uMT-
VtK
SOT'KARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
Set
Number
Tlr*
Ooaclty
Start—End
S'jn
tvcrjgc
Readings ranged from to % opacity
The source vws/was not in ccnpllcnce with at
the tifr.G evaluation v/as rcade.
-------
OBSERVATION RECORD
PAGE OF.
COv?AS'Y f>-£VrJc>-0'3
LCCAT1C'~/' t-tCcrJ* *
TEST iiS/Ziko,.,) **¦-/
PATE iUc, 77
OBSERVER ,5 f"<- As?"
TYPE FACILITY tzxrr^^o^
POINT OF EMISSIONS r?*:*1-
N-
O
IV.
".In.
"T
Seccnfi
TTTJT
&
*
' j
STEAM I'LU.'iE
(chcc''. 1 f ?nr>l Icablc)
iT: :ac"i vJ 1 De i.icnod
COMMENTS
1 0 I
1
1
1 1
1 2
I J
1 «
5
6
1
7
V
c.
1
10
u
i?
13
l:
ii
10
17
i'!
19
iu
.1
i?
¦n
t -J
11
;o
o
Q
0
6
t'
/i'i
o
C5>
6
0
>1
?i
0
Q
p
1'
'('&
a
r>
<1
p
M
59
<>10
Q
X?
OBSERVATION RECORD
(Continued)
PAGE OF
COMPAVY
LOCATION
TEST HW3rr
DATE '
03SERVER
TYPE EAClllTV
POItlT OF EMISSlCHT
S?
eonds
. ST£AM ko.'.E
(c'ipcV If apiUcflble)
CO'lVc'ITS
Mr.
Hfn.
0
lb
3'J
45
Act^hcd
lieiacnco
i|
30
Q
P
0
ci
31
3?
j 3
<¦5
3'j
3(TJ
37
30
34
10
Ol
V
<•.3
'• %
05
•if)
fl?
CB
a-j
bo
SI
,
5?
b 3
rA
65
50"
6/
CO
GO
¦ ¦
irn Do; 71—201 50 I'UcU 11-11-7-I.U.4A uaj
FtDtXAt RIC1JTEZ, VOL 3?, NO. 219-.TUZSDAY, NOVEMBEB 12, W4
-------
Plant_
7, /?77
Operator_
Sample Box No._
Meter Box No. ^
Meter A H
C Factor
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Time: Start Time
End Time /SS~C /
Probe Tip DJa. In. - 7*-/ /
Pitot Tube No. -3 ~" /
Probe Length/type 3 /&/o
/ •£<)
/Z-2
3
y-r
¦7So .
G/-<
3
\o
n.7*
/'SS>
/5>
/ o 6
/or
JT
/go
LYf
7
)¦ '-y
//S5> It
£¦&(
/¦6o
/C'^f
/*<"
6
H/6
ieQsT
I
/fSt a
&. £
nc
Ci,n
J
\
oi
i
1
P> 4
'!& So
J.W
/r%
A>
9 3>
071
/7f
*>
1 0
/'i
<7 6 'z~
/ ^
7 6g
A S
//
9s/
2Crt
LLO
2
K
/ ' ' ' ' ' '
4&-TX
o>S*
/'^T-
/-cA
/oi
(° £
//
Jit
Ja
tjun*
6¦&
l 00
/ cn>
/6 9
/o7
7o
14
3%!
JCO
Ltc.v
CM'
& /C
r'y
0 .00 V
i^V
toyo
/&%
Comments t
4>/fod C7 -- /?f%>
V
-------
Station No.:
Run No.: >- C Ambient Temperature: yc Vr
Barometric Pressure: ;-3 ml of y}(A~
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected o ml
Impinqer 2
Final Volume Tu- ml of
Initial Volume tec? ml
Volume collected -/^ ml
Impinqer 3
Final Volume c? ml of
Initial Volume c ml
Volume collected O ml
Impinqer
Final volume ml of
Initial vfrkime
Volume collec
Impinqer
Final weight . -o gm of 5>£-A-xx
Initial weight 77/ o gm
Weight collected 2_^_gm
Total Volume Collected — ? ml
Filters
Weight
No. Final V/eight Tare V/eight Collected
gm gm gm
gm gm gm
Cleanup performed by on
\
-------
Plant
u*S)?
Run No. O&P"?
Location / .4rs-' rzc.^^
CUI IEL
VERY IMPORTAWT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of
each test point.
Ambient Teny ®F
Date_
Operator
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture Z
22
Time: Start Time_
End Time /g/5
Probe Tip Dia. In. 0.
Pitot Tube No. .3 ~ f
2-
1
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Meter A H /•fa?"
C Factor
t-'C- ' , O^l
Probe Length/type —
Filter No. P - fa
A •Slv
.'7b/
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
W.oH
Pitot
in. H-0
AP
Orifice All
in H20
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Ifepinger
Tenp.
°F
Oven
Temp.
"F
Probe
Temp.
0 F
Stack
Temp.
°F
Stack
Temp.
"F
CF+160)
Desired
Actual
Outlet
Inlet
A V
r
y~>7
'•57
/<
llo
/of
%°(
O/)
/tr
3
fo
S 4
.U(
/•?
/ ?
?$
%
1-9-
K*
3-3?
¦>!?
C*7?
Z
/<
<#93?
f.<
/.«T
f1
?o
7O
"KM
vn
o/(*
Lit*
/
2 o
¦ i?
tM
9l-
?4
73
'M~
6-7iT
' I
t
iru
*KO
Li
tH
fot,«
foi
/o.y
7 0
¦A'cO
Ub^T
(
7°
o63 CG"
. /a
(¦7-
/ %
toy
/O^
u.o
71
•yio
-)io
L-70
t
/??/
> LrZrffc Chi
cK (fZ
I' IH"
-k'--
')OcfC
1
1
O
-
i
io/V',
?fo
(.h
Consents:
-------
RECORD OF YISUAt, DETERMINATION OF OPACITY
PAG?
cf
COMPANY d<> 7^1
location flp\-zc*^r
7EST NUMBER Qf-O^
DATE ^Ao/77
TYPE FACILITY £v/p. 'O-oi
CONTROL DEVICE
HOURS OF OBSERVATION-^
OBSERVER
03SERVER CERTIFICATION CAT:
OBSERVER AFFILIATION ^
/
/7 7
y *? -\
/- / m-
POINT OF EMISSIONS
HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE FOINT
'7o'
CLOCK TIKE
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
KATHER CONDITIONS
Kind Direction
Kind Speed
Ambient Temperature
SKY CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc#)
PLUME DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
OTHER IJIFOOTIOII
Initial
Final
<*{o' r-
c tZc>( r
)
Yo' >,
C!
-------
COv?A\'Y -WEBSERVER /T // ^
LCCAT! C'i*^~7*r) . t|f,?„ ,-y TYPE FACILITY .'.X'Jl Rj^jt
KST U'J-'.ELfi cL~y~) - pOIliT CF EMISSIONS <: '21/
observation record
pate
GE OF
o
Hr.
".In.
Sec cn^s
STEAM f'LU.'.E
fcScc''. 1 f anpl Icablc)
COMMENTS
0
15 ! 20
\ p.
U'
A: toci
Dcuched
1 0
1
1
f'V^'vv.-sYjCpvr'i..
2
s/'uhi-'' ?- «:>->'
J
,-f 1-<•',£ 1
4
—f, v-\ -r, ^ 1.1 -im (v
—
; L:- v\A r-i.' -.
0
1
1 j
7
i
H
<.
~r
11
/-
<0
r-i
1
( >
.CI
, —»
12
13
< )
r >
/ V>
f
O
?-\ u -
1
r">
V) \ f)
'
' ~>
1 1
1 i
' *
(')
f > ('1
\7
• ,-j
1 •
19
c U
'• i
17 |
1
L J
;o
x»
?7
¦fH
<¦9
1 1
COMPANY
LOCATION
TEST HU:<3HT
DATE '
OBSERVATION RECORD
(Continued)
C3SERVCR
7Y?t r/.cinrr
PAGE OF
poirn or emission
llr.
Kin.
Seconds
STE.AU PLU.'.t
'cSccV U noiUcflble)
CO'KtNTS
0
lb
30
'15
Attached
uetacnod
1 30
31
V
jJ
.14
jiT
L Jb
37
3H
3-5
>.U
•'.I
tU
11
.11
15
••r>
17
/>>!
10
so
^ 1
5?
S3
it
60
06~
0/
on
50
1
[rn Do; 7v-2oijO rued 11-11-7-;,u.4j
KOIXAl Eicimj, VOL 3?, NO. 219—.TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1974
-------
Plant: Hale: y
Address: /yto—'t . &•. Operators: '
Station No.: ctfob :
Run No.: Ambient Temperature:
Barometric Pressure: JZ f.f'/ Sample Box Number:
Impinger 1
Final Volume //Vo ml of /4 £ /C. T~r
Initial Volume c- ml
Volume collected o ml
Impinger 2
Final Volume S~Y ml of /< ' T~ r
Initial Volume ml
Volume collected —J 73. ml
Impinger 3
Final Volume ml of ^/XZ
Initial Volume ^ ml " ^
Volume collected ml
Impinger
Final VoTume. ml of
Initial VolumeN,^ ml
Volume collected ml
Impinger
Final weight o gm of g ^
Initial weight TV ? gm S
Weight collected o gm
Total Volume Collected -?5" ml
Filters
Weight
No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected
A
gm gm gm
jgm gm gm
Cleanup performed by ^*6* on_
-------
COMPANY
LOCATION O
I J S
RECORD OF VISUAU DE7uPj%] I NAT XOM OF OpACITf
PAGE c?
TEST NUMBER ^ &
DAT E /hfr>h". /977
TYPE FACILITY /?/ £W-q
CONTROL DEVICE
(X
HOURS OF 03SERVAJI0W£££
/k
OBSERVER CERTIFICATION l'ATE_
OBSERVER AFFILIATION
POINT OF EMISSIONS
HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE POIMT o
CLOCK TIME
OBSERVER LOCATION
Distance to Discharge
"Direction from Discharge
Height of Observation Point
BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
WEATHER CONDITIONS
Kind Direction
V/ind Speed
Anblent Temperature
SKY CONDITIONS (clear,
overcast, % clouds, etc.)
PLl'ME DESCRIPTION
Color
Distance Visible
07IIM l.'IFOOTIOIl
Initial
Final
l}o'
'
W
3*'
|3>Lt iUiJ
jy* Sfy
-------
APPENDIX H
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
-------
^ to
LU
x oc
O _J
z <
LU (_)
a. •-«
CL f—
< >-
—J
<
<
C^^ty/fcir 9Vi @
//[zT/iJLS: Qo J\
rf~/l£r7*/c. u a. rt7~ £. /)/Js}JL ^sf/vT f//.TECS (^PUr//cj> S\)
s/} hifllS.
j>/9rs
jr/>r/o*s
A/mna££
ZS^ttCA/cE
/ju/uee#
fm r C{fiOS£ \>sT.
F/A. T££
T/)££
U/T.
F/A//?JL
SSf)TE
J?r\ST> ©
jo;/ S//PJ.
j2"*iuT. @
•A 6,
*-n- 7/
o(oo 7
ot
OOOO J
/?%>"
O.j? 7 08
0.s?7O6>
t
o./s&f
(9.0 8 *¦!&
vT-/?- 71
y-/?- w
o6>o7
o£
o o cog
o.a?v?8
O.^S'O/
o./?o?
0. OS"}*/
3
0./8 9/?
O.O 7 (n 7
77
V-Jo-77
O&o?
oy
OOOOV
*'/>"
0.3o 8£
o.3 0 78
O. 18 73
0* //ns
££
o.x?6>j?J
0./8P8
0.O?V3
>r-x?- 71
v-*o-w
Ooo7
0(o
0000(2
0.3H18
0>3
-------
'Acj 7~S vor
frfzr/JAS Oo.^J
7%*T/ « X /7 7*£ AaJ/)^ t1/°X £ X 'MO £> 3>
J/}/;//>.{ €
j>;>re
•XT'/IT/OA/
//ttMatjQ
S£Qt{£//C£
/Jt( H)HE a
B£/)KZ£
//Ulr)BS(l
T/jL Of
¦Sf)tfPJL£
&CSlc -a/T>
2£f)K£&
7f)A£
IS77
P/A//J/L
//£f
\w'A
F/A//?JL
&/)?£
li/A Q
*><>/ s/x?0
9-7. ?'//#
9-7. 9V/?0
99. 91'/9
0. /*?/
jr-^? 7
"77
o(o0 7
OS"
93.'//? 09
93' y*?0£
93.3070
O. //3 a3
*'*>-97
v-£o-7y
o&oy
OCft
3T*t
>c?/^r
9jc?.
99. S9&?
0. OOOCs>
3v?- 77
B£f)K££
HA.
3?
0
9^* /88 8
9/?. /887
9£. /88O
0. 0007
Q, E/?k££
e,JL/)AJK
-
V
0
9V. 9*?/?3
?'/. ?£/'!
?
-------
NK»'it uf Swi»»»-i R-oij/\,\^ ES ^ED , LjL
P-Lo-t Ct-t-i-H,.
— .-—— i ¦ i ¦ >< /r " ' m l ¦ .— ¦ ¦ — r\ r n r a
SAMPLE
NUK3ER
* if
STATION DESCRIPTION
TIME
ANALYSES PERFORMED
tt YOROCr^fa
•1
CHLORINE
(>'I i'aV/V,-
Pt flL Lt; 0 L" t- R
r\L4tiA' V/.?"/?;
(P. era
0. CTD
Olri- at - 0Lltcl
y o. by (, 1
/. 0/ *"
OX
/, 7#
P3~
0 3
I.S'I
0.3xT
C3
/. 4'j~
0-Lf 7
OT
/, 3'/
/.
" Ob "
/. ?4
0. 3?
OA-fA REP OR
'V0 /
V c-rM/v<;
/
/
f\RS£t) m
= T7?4P 3
ol u r/o M
~X- / ft^ c /// ^ ^
'iAi~ / a;
rv/^
* />/.
-p/./Tr&D i\
LL Ttt£
A-P.c.£
SOL.0]
!0?J[t-O'-U Ll
UcL^)
------- |