------- C-9 NEIC Procedure for Pi tot Tube Calibration Introduction The Type-S pi tot tube is used by NEIC to measure stack gas velocity during source sampling. The pi tot tube coefficient (Cp) of this instrument is determined by calibration against a trace- able National Bureau of Standards (NBS) standard pi tot tube. The Type-S pi tot tube is calibrated on a probe sheath v/ith a h inch dia nozzle atta'ched. All pi tot tubes are calibrated from 305 m/min (1000 ft/min) to 1524 m/min (5000 ft/min). Pitot tubes used during tests will subsequently be recalibrated at a minimum of 3 points within the velocity range observed during testing. Tubes which have been damaged or suspected of being damaged during field use will be recalibrated over the entire range (i.e. 305 to 1524 m/min). I. Equipment Required A. Flow System - Calibration is performed in a f»low system meeting the following minimum requirements: (1) The air stream is confined in a well-defined cross sectional area, either circular or rectangular. The minimum size is 30.5 cm (12 inches) diameter for circular ducts and at least 25 cm (10 inches), as the shortest dimension for rectangular ducts. (2) Entry ports provided in the test section, shall be a minimum of 8 duct diameters downstream and 2 diameters upstream of any flow disturbance, e.g. bend, expansion, contraction, opening, etc.
------- (3) The flow system must have the capacity to generate over the range of 305 m to 1524 m (1000 ft. - 5000 ft.)/min. Velocities in this range must be constant with time to guarantee steady flow during calibration. B. Calibration Standard A standard type pi tot tube either calibrated directly by N.B.S. or traceable to an fl.B.S. standard shall be the calibration standard. C. Differential Pressure Gauge An inclined or expanded scale manometer shall be used to measure velocity head (aP). Such gauges 3iall be capable of measuring AP to within + 0.13 mm (0.005 inches) f^O. A micro-manometer capable of measuring with 0.013 mm (0.0005 in) H2O will be used to measure AP of less than 13 (0.5") H20. D. Pi tot Tube Lines Flexible lines made of tygon or similar tubing shall be used. E. Thermometer A mercury in glass or other type thermometer checked agains a mercury in glass thermometer is considered suitable. F. Barometer A mercury column barometer shall be available to determine atmospheric pressure. Physical Check 1. The openings are sharp and do not have a rolled edge. 2. The impact planes of sides A & B are perpendicular to the Traverse Tube axis [Figure 2],
------- C-ll 3. The impact planes are parallel to the longitudinal tube axis [Figure 3]. Calibration Procedure The Type-S pi tot tube shall be assigned an identification number. The first digit of the number is the effective length of the tube, followed by a dash and consecutive numbers for the number of tubes of the same effective length, i.e. 5-1 signifies a five foot pitot^tube and is the number one tube. Calibration proceeds as follows. A. Fill manometer with clean oil of the proper specific gravity. Attach and leak check all pi tot tube lines. B. Level and zero mcnometer. t C. Position the standard pitot tube in the test section at the calibration point. If the flow system is large enough and does no interfere with the Type-S tube the standard tube may be left in the system. D. Insert the Type-S tube into the flow system. E. Checks for the effect of turbulance are made as follows: 1. Read AP on both Type-S and standard pitot tubes with the'standard pitot tube in place and compare with read- ings when the standard tube is withdrawn from system. 2. Read aP on the Type-S tube at centerline of flow system, then take readings while moving the tube to the side of the system. This will define the boundary turbulance layer. 3. Position the Type-S tube so that there impact openings are perpendicular to the duct cross sectional area end
------- C-12 check for null (zero) reading. Absence of a null reading at this position indicates non-laminar flow conditions. F. Read AP stcj and record on data table. 6. With the Type-S "A" leg orientated into the flow read aPs and record on data table. H. Repeat steps F and G until three sets of velocity data have been obtained. I. Remove Type-S pi tot tube and rotate probe nozzle until it aligns with side "B" impact openings. J. Insert the Type-S pi tot tube and proceed as in steps F through K. Adjust flow system to new volocity and repeat F-J. e L. Record air temperature in the test system and barometric pressure during testing. Calculations 1. At each "A"-side and "B"-side velocity setting, calculate the three valves of Cp (s) as follows: pi tot tubing inches H2O AP$ - Velocity heaa\ measured by the Type-S pi tot tube, inches H^O 2. Calculate Cp, the average (mean of the three Cp(s) valves. H. Where: CPs ~ Type-S pi tot tube coefficient Cp - Standard pitot tube coefficient O'BS) AP - Velocity head, measured by Standard
------- C-l 3. For each CP calculated in step 2, calculate o, the average deviation from the mean as follows: o(Side "A" or "B") = ^Icp (s) - Cp (A or B) J 3 3 4. The pi tot is acceptable if: (a) The "A" and "B" side average deviations calculated by • equation 2 are <_ 0.01. (b) The difference of the "A"_and "B" sides Cp calculated by equation 1 is <_ 0.01 for each individual velocity. 5. Calculate the test section velocity as follows: V = KCp A AP" std V pm Where: V = Average test-section velocity, ft/min K = 5130 (constant) Cp = Coefficient of standard pi tot tube T = Temperature of gas stream °R P = Barometric pressure, inches Hg M = Molecular weight of air = 29.0 aF std = Average of the three standard pi tot tube readings, inches 1^0 Record Keeping Flow system data and information on each pi tot tube shall be recorded in a bound book. The flow system data shall include: 1. The tunnel cross-sectional area and length up-stream and down-stream of the test site )ft.) from disturbances.
------- C -14 2. Time tunnel used (hrs) 3. Air temperature (°F) in flow system and barometric pressure (inches Hg). 4. All checks for turbulance and flow distribution. 5. Velocity range (ft/min). The pi tot tube information shall include: 1. I.'D. number 2. Checks for physical d^uiages, errors noted and modifications. 3. Dates and surveys pi tot tubes were used. * 4. Date of calibrations, coefficient and dates of re-calibration. The calibration records will be kept on file at NEIC. Copies of the appropriate calibration dates will be furnished for each source test project.
------- C-15 sr Figure 1. Measurement of Type-S^pitot tubo length {dimension "a") and impacr-p^r.s separation distance {dimension Mb"), TRANSVERSE TUBE AXIS IMPACT PLANES [Figure 2. Typs-S pitotitube, endi ,vissv;_ impact-opening planes per- pendicular to transverse tube axis.. L p'r-J GIT Lf DI A L i tubeaxis .A-SIDE PLANE B-SIDE PLANE- Figure 2. Type-S tube, top view; impact-ooen- ¦ing planes parallel to longitudinal lube axis. From "A TYPE-S PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION STUDY" by Robert F. Vollaro, October 15, 1975
------- US ["nviror.mental Protection Agency Kat'onnl Enforcement Investigations Center-Denver q_]6 Calibration Pi tot Tube: ID N umber K1 P> S Cp Q, r\ri 'ype-S Pi tot Tube ID Number: ^ o " uj AP Standard Pi tot a P S-Type Pi tot c p Comments A leq R leq A B i-^c- 3 rSo 35 c O-Un O'^D W,. '^"5 c?.£S & So 1 2- S* 2-to O tMb 1. Id I.-&C 1 ¦ to O^U 1 y ti ¦ *A! i.fsd ) O^/ £> Vll Iho Mo ) to O'WI O 14/ O'^1 om 6 Sfl • * J i rf -V / . ; Q, /> ¦ 0^*1 / 1 - ' 1 a.m n .faz , si.Us f) (yOS /! . 6 • 0 < bo C ¦ \ 1 "J s 6 *T'-" o , la n\& ^' / n 797, /0,l« 6 il^o _ - < 1 Lt5 »a_< 1 ? 7vc n > 19- O ¦ 1? nu.i r^-i*i j..?- . - : 1 1 v c i. ' Leg Average Cp probe sheath attached nozzle attached UJ sempling"iso!
------- l.'S £'nv iromr intol Protection Afjoncy u'tional fluforcc::i-nt Invi'iticjat iom: Center-Denver C-17 Cali bration Pi tot Tube:ID Number • Cp iype-S Pi tot Tube ID Number: /( !l ^ P Standard Pi tot a. P S-Type Pi tot c p L> / -/ r- op^ c y.tJ $"-3 A lea B leq A B Comments / C / -fy / *T)< .2o ! tc XlP' / %C JJD .?cr ¦ If M H ?o / 2G no ?csr ?G ------- US Fnvirowrontal Protection Agency National Enforcement Investigation:. Center-Denver C-18 Calibration Pitot Tube: ID Number /V/>S -/ Type-S Pitot Tube ID Number: /n - ,Z _CP.. AP Standard Pi tot aP S-Tvpe Pitot c p 0 Comments0^ A leq B leq A B , / lO . I9o , if cT* . 7^- .7? 7 ,n9c -.m* $ ./cfO ^> , 3$~S" . 3.^ . 75" 2 .7^7 . 2*c/0 . S'Oo , vfcr .7<*f / 7vST n(,o ,is? , &tc . vfr t 7<*( - 76lr A , oo>- ' 7^'fO . , 7ry , 7S'* , 7£3 /76V Leg Average Cp probe sheath attached YtZS nozzle attached ygl<; sampling i somatically Performed By: Calibration Date: {.y/2. 8^/77 ------- US t nv i roniron t al Protection Agency National D; force.'ir nt Investigations Center-Denver C-19 Calibration Pi tot Tube: ID Nurnber_ Type-S Pi tot lube ID Nu.iiber: i Cp r -/ _ZiL ' 1> c ' U t - > AP Standard Pi tot -A P S-Type Pi tot c P L\?^ i j-*- - ^ Comrpe n t s A leq B leq A B cn !4L / 5o oC:7 :irl / We / bb / .TlL- .& ¦ 9zo . 77 ? ¦%7 .?i3 %CLI ,70 .3ctT .fa*. j3oQ 3o^T ¦ ?o-X ,?o . 3oL! • J3o.C -fcp- r ^ i • 1 x -• . ?l! ¦?cC Leg Average Cp jy I I LU L OUI IUI ULIUII. probe sheath attached nozzle attached sampling isokinetical ly *// Performed By: ------- APPENDIX D CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES AND RECORDS------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROCEDURES June 1, 1975 GENERAL The evidence gathering portion of a survey should be characterized by the minimum number of samples required to give a fair representation of the water, air or solid v:aste sampled. To the extent possible, the quantity of samples and sample locations will be determined prior to the survey. Chain of Custody procedures must be followed to maintain the documentation necessary to trace sample possession from the time taken until the evidence is introduced into court. A sample is in your "custody" if: 1. It is in your actual physical possession, or 2. It is in your view, after being in your physical possession, or 3. It was in your physical possession and then you locked it up in a manner so that no one could tamper with it. All survey participants will receive a copy of the survey study plan and will be kno-./ledgeable of its contents prior to the survey. A pre-survey briefing will be held to re-appraise all participants of the survey objectives, sample locations and Chain of Custody procedures. After all Chain of Custody sanoles are collected, a de-briefing will be held in the field to determine adherence to Chain of Custody procedures and whether additional evidence type samples are required. S'CiPLE COLLECTION 1. To the maximum extent achievable, as few people as possible should handle the sample. 2. Water, air, or solid waste samples shall be obtained, using standard field sampling techniques. 3. Sample tags (Exhibit I) shall be securely attached to the sample container at the time the complete sample is collected and shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: station number, station location, data taken, time taken, type of sample, sequence number (first sample of the day - sequence Mo. 1, second sample - sequence No 2, etc.), analyses required and samplers. The tags must be legibly filled out in ballpoint (waterproof ink). "5. Blan! samples shall also be taken with preservatives which will be analyzed by the laboratory to exclude the possibility of container or preservative contann nation. 5. A pre-printcd, bound Field Data Record logbook shall be maintained to re- cord field measurements and other pertinent information necessary to refresh the sampler's memory in the event he later takes the stand to testify re- garding his actions during the evidence gathering activity. A separate set of field notebooks shall be maintained for each survey and stored in a safe place where they could be protected and accounted for at all times. Standard formats (Exhibits II and III) have been established to minimize field entries and include the date, time, survey, type of samples taken, voluie of each sample, type of analysis, sample numbers, preservatives, sample location and field measurements such as temperature, conductivity,------- D-2 DO, pH, flow and any other pertinent information or observations. The entries shall be signed by the field sampler. The preparation and conser- vation of the field logbooks during tie survey will be the responsibility of the survey coordinator. Once the survey is complete, field logs will be retained by the survey coordinator, cr his designated representative, as a part of the permanent record. 6. The field sampler is responsible for the care and custody of the sanies collected until properly dispatched ~.c the receiving laboratory or t^rn^d over to an assigned custodian. He rjst assure that each container is in his physical possession or in his view e~. all times, or locked in such a place and manner that no one can tamper witr. it. 7. Colored slides or photographs should oe taken which would visually shew the outfall sample location and any wate" ccllution to substantiate any con- clusions of the investigation. Written documentation on the back of the photo should include the signature cr the photographer, time, date and site location. Photographs of this nature, which may be used as evidence, shall be handled recognizing Chain of Custccy procedures to prevent alteration. TRANSFER OF CUSTODY AND SHIPMENT 1. Samples will be accompanied by a Chain of Custody Record which includes the name of the survey, samplers' signat.-es, station number, station location, date, time, type of seT.ole, sequence -.un-oer, number of containers end analy- ses required (Fig. IV). When turnir,: over the possession of samDles, the transferor and transferee will sign, cate and time the sheet. This record sheet allows transfer of custody of i croup of samples in the field, to the mobile laboratory or when samples are dispatched to the fiEIC - Denver labora- tory. When transferring a portion of the samples identified on the sheet to the field mobile laboratory, the ind" /idual sarples trust be noted in the colunn with the signature of the person relinquishing the samples. The field laboratory person receiving the sar.p'.es will acknowledge receipt by signing in the appropriate column. 2. The field custodian or field sampler, if a custodian has not been assigned, will have the responsibility of prope-ly packaging and dispatching samples to the proper laboratory for analysis. The "Dispatch" portion of the "Chain of Custody Record shall be properly filled out, dated, and signed. 3. Samples will be properly packed in shipment containers such as ice chests, to avoid breakage. The shipping contairers will be padlocked for shipment to the receiving laboratory. 4. All packages will be accompanied by t~e Chain of Custody Record showing iden- tification of the contents. The onc-.nal will accompany the shipment, and a copy will be retained by the survey coordinator. 5. If sent by rrail, register the package with return receipt requested. If sent by common carrier, a Government Bill of Lading should be obtained. Receipts from post offices, and bills of ladir^ will be retained as part of the perma- nent Chain of Custody documentation. 6. If samples are delivered to the laboratory when appropriate personnel are not there to receive them, the samples r^st be locked in a designated area within the laboratory in a manner so that no one can tamper with them. The same per- son r.ust then return to the laboratc-/ and unlock the samples and deliver custody to the appropriate custodian.------- D-3 LABORATORY CUSTODY PROCEDURES 1. The laboratory shall designate a "sample custodian." An alternate will be designated in his absence. In addition, the laboratory shall s«t aside a "sample storage security area." This should be a clean, dry, isolated room which can be securely locked from the outside. 2. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons. 3. All incoming samples shall be received only by the custodian, who will in- dicate receipt by signing the Chain or Custody Sheet accompanying the samples and retaining the sheet as pernanent records. Couriers picking up samples at the airport, post office, etc. shall sign jointly with the laboratory custodian. 4. Immediately upon receipt, the custodian will place the sample in the sample room, which will be locked at all times except when samples are removed or replaced by the custodian. To the naximum extent possible, only the custo- dian should be permitted in the sample room. 5. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive or light-sensitive samples, or other sample materials having unusual physical characteristics, or re-' quiring special handling, are properly stored and maintained. 6. Only the custodian will distribute samples to personnel who are to perform tests. 7. The analyst will record in his laboratory notebook or analytical worksheet, identifying information describing the sample, the procedures perforred and the results of the testing. Tne notes shall be dated and indicate who performed the tests. The notes shall be retained as a permanent record in the laboratory and should note any abnormalties which occurred during the testing procedure. In the event that the person who performed the tests is not available as a witness at tire of trial, the government may be able to introduce the notes in evidence under the Federal Business Records Act. 8. Standard methods of laboratory analyses shall be used as described in the Guidelines Establishing lest Procedures for Analysis of Pollutants," 38 F.R. 28758, October 16, 1973. If laboratory personnel deviate from standard procedures, they should be prepared to justify their decision dur- ing cross-examination. 9. Laboratory personnel are responsible for the care and custody of the sample once it is handed over to them and should be prepared to testify that the sample was in tneir possession and view or secured in the laboratory at all times from the moment it was received from the custodian until th° tests were run. 10. Once the sample testing is completed, the unused portion of the sample to- got ?r with all identifying tags and laboratory records, should be return°d to the custodian. The returned tagged sample will be retained in the sample roo„i until it is required for trial. Strip charts and other documentation ot work will also be turned over to the custodian. 11. Samples, tags and laboratory records of tests may be destroyed only upon the order of the laboratory director, who will first confer with the Chief, tnforccment Specialist Office, to role certain that the information is no longer required or the samples have deteriorated.------- EXHIBIT I D-4 EPA, NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER Slolion No. Dato Timo Scqucnco No. Station Location C nmp g 2 O ~ _EOD _SoIidi _COD _Nulricnls Samplers: _McJalj _OiI end Grcaso _D.O. .Bad. _OlIior. Rornarki J Prosorvati ve: Front ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER BUILDING 53, BOX 25227, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER. DENVER, COLORADO 80225 toy Back------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office Of Enforcement NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SURVEY :A/WU O-'L SAMPLERS: (Signature) L-* V.W * STATION NUMBER STATION LOCATION DATE SAMPLE TYPE TIME Water Comp Grab SEQ NO NO OF CONTAINERS ANALYSIS REQUIRED I Vo 0 ,V /"<_K /- /A; 5 ^ * A i°'o f (j:c >-c L ^ I I ' SQ I Relinquished by /signature) Received by. (Signature) Dote /Time Relinquished by (Signature) Received by (Signature1 Date /Time Relinquished by (Signon, e) Received by (Signature) Date /Time Relinquished by (Signature) Received by Mobile Laboratory for field analysis (Signature) Date /Time Dispatched by (Signature) Date/Time Received for Laboratory by: Date /Time Method of Shipment ** Distribution Orig — Accompany Shipment 1 Copy—Survey Coordinator Field Files »6PO 6 79-04 0------- D-6 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office Of Enforcement NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SURVEY 'vb') ' fto f I ( ?/c /GCO ^s/ o% I o Tii. ¦ f/>\ ¦¦-T > C U rri rJl w J tr V i r0---7o^ fcU'^K Mod Jl < 1 1 0"-L Li S'c-l ! '-zO(}(p. /?oz fl nJo n/ 1 r'lT?r? ^ jTv / 2' fi oK !?o7 I! V'nA~ L?$c v 0/ / A LJ>P\ c K ,'/•!" > .r- ^iprijz ] ! rrcO / 1 / / •' V_> of 1 ..'"/-V (.!> 'tr k. /c?o9- H i- i "x. o / 1 1 O'U /C3 r\ \^ruZAAJr^v: /'- o/j /9oH /> fo y , n y / I /7« ' 7l, A-' (** C ------- D-7 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office Of Enforcement NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER Building 53, Box 25227, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SURVEY SAMPLERS ^ (Signature) STATION NUMBER J ? /^Q2 STATION LOCATION /~^Cc. X~ a jT/>i /c DATE >7 //y/7>7 SAMPLE TYPE TIME Water Comp Grab /^oo pa } X X SEO NO D? a 3 NO OF CONTAINERS / / ANALYSIS RfcOUIRED7< Relinquished by {SignatureI -'"P Received by. (Signature) Relinquished by fSignafureJ Received by (s,gno>u,ei Relinquished by (St gnatu.e) Relinquished by. (SignofureJ Dispatched by ^Signature) Method of Shipment. Received by {s,gnaturei Received by Mobile Laboratory for field analysis (SignatureJ Date/Time Received for Laboratory by' \/ Date/T ime Date/T ime Date/T ime Date/T ime ime Date/T /-?_ y I 9 ------- APPENDIX E ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DATA------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER BUILDING 53, BOX 25227, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER DENVER, COLORADO 80225 Field Operations Branch Deputy Chief Chemistry Branch Detection Limits for L.A. Source Test Data The data transmitted on October 14, 1977, included less than values for the particulate acetone, organic and inorganic impinger samples. All weighings were performed on an analytical balance to the nearest 0.1 rng. Positive results for the blank samples are from random contamination during sample collection, handling and analysis. It is important that results not be reported as real when in fact the positive values are from contamination. This possibility is minimized by determining the detection limit based on the determined blank values. The detection limit is calculated by adding two standard deviations (95% confidence level) of the blank values to the mean of the blank values. If the mean blank is subtracted from all results, then this value is excluded from the detection limit. Typically, only a few blank measurements are made and one hiqh blank value can bias the de- tection limit. However, this v/i 11 provide a conservative reporting of positive values. If any error is made, it will be on the side of not reportinq some real values, but will guard against reporting values as real that resulted from contamination. Mr. Paul dePercin DArE December 2, 1977 Mark Carter cc: Meigqs Younq------- .1AM- SU.w.' w t- t- O I DATES COVERED V/p - *?//?/7 > SAMPLE HU.".3ER STATION DESCRIPTION TIME Pa rvic o<.<\rr Jknuoe p/>fc-r\co{AT ANAL Y S E S P E £j(.XA "ft. R F 0 R M E D Ayj __ .l ^7^^ i J.y j- S£"X| i i/- / - Of'OcU(. FdC 5r^CX ^/ - 03 -o*?'" '/ II /I ll /taCO S5 F icT $ / £jj , O FiLTSi 2,£0 , 187- /^o; _ O J -C^K r icTiji K>. f\ rjf °l//S <(a <0.5 / /o?. - n1)'/ FtC "5T#OC /tei_ 6.U /Sjjo *78 /5.5 ^ Lo 2_^0 19) ». •' " — 73 . n,o .0,5 WO . "3So 1 no?. -03 -0')/ s h >1 '. '• \ — If-. LS l//o 3I>~ HcTL ' C'l /7 FjCT-d rt<_ Pi 0 -J w 0 4.(0 <0^ ¦ <7 ¦ m > no ------- nNALiiauAL imiM Rli-ukTINu ruRM NAME OF SURVEY L.ft 5^>iKf CJ?. FIELD DATA DATES COVERED *?j 0 — f/^77 SAMPLE NO. STATION DESCRIPTION TIME ANALYSES PERFORMED AiJjTpr\v, ijS-'ib F~,lnir L'va p i f\ r ,, 'O 2.C--V ./*<7 -01/£ /¦^c 57c*cM &) 1(d^ 24 7 I'fOhOi-Oltf ii o^)S f* 7 \30l-03-0^,17 V l£en? 6 / ( r.ft Si) I (rJt iKH-Qt-OHL -Ql 'glA io (c &4-15 4./ 1^101-0(^17 F'CC St£t_< /<. i/Vic/ji'/| 1 ?So f 4 I'to l'Ol-(fin ii — 35 c tf6Z-0$-OfyZ h — ('( lo '*,61 - ^7/7 o*j 3 ------- Attachment II E-4 METHOD 5 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Filters The filters to be tared are desiccated at 20 -5.6°C (68 -10°F) and ambient pressure for at least 24 hours and weighed at 6 or more hour intervals to a constant weight, i.e.°,^< mg. change from previous weigh- ing, and results recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg. During each weighing the filter is not exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period greater than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50 percent. The filters are received from the field in aluminum foil wrapped Petri dishes. The aluminum foil is removed and the Petri dishes placed into a dessicator using indicating drierite as the dessicant. This dessicant removes the uncombined water on the filters. The filters are desiccated at 20 + 5.6°C (68 -10°F) and ambient pressure for at least 24 hours and weighed in the same manner as in taring. Prior to weighing the filters, both tared and gross, the single pan analytical balanced is calibrated against Class £5" weights. Also, prior to each weighing, dessicator and weighing room temperature and humidity readings are recorded. The filters in the Petri dishes are individually removed from the dessicator immediately prior to weighing. Removal and all other handling of the filters are performed with tweezers. Acetone Wash The acetone probe washes are received in quart glass jars with Teflon lined lids. The contents of each jar are transferred into tared 250 ml breakers along with the acetone used to rinse the jars after transferral. The beakers are then placed into a hood at ambient tempera- ture for acetone evaporation. V\o<>4 In the band, the beakers are placed in an aluminum foil tunnel which is designed to prevent any possible contamination by particulates and to allow an efficient air flow for escape of acetone vapors. The hood door is kept closed and tared beakers used as blanks are included to verify that the samples did not become contaminated.------- E-5 After at least 24 hours in the evaporating tunnel, beakers are removed and placed into dessicators using drierite as the dessicant. The beakers remain in the dessicator for at least 24 hours and weighed to a constant weight. The final weights are reported using a single pan analytical balance calibrated against Class "S" weights. Room temperature and humidity are measured during the dessication and weighing process. No filters or acetone residues are discarded after analysis. The residue from the beakers are rinsed with a minimal amount of acetone back into the mason jars in which they were collected. The filters and residues along with their respective sample tags are stored in a predetermined place for at least a year. Eaw Data Bench Cards Ojho /ou/f*: C hi"*** vP^r/OA/ /yx. T£sr. 6> £¦>/ ;/ss. Q ¦f (S //"J. fUTSS T/uCC isr fM/lJL u/r rwxi. j>#rr O/ttb Pouter /ife 7V/o j) . r-3 ———— *jer£ ¦SffiTjOiS a'ua:i(£ J£Q(JC//CC /JUAtS Cji ocSCCC //Q.-J6S4. _4'ru>t:Q j/.a -t 6 tfCS S£SX££ k/K ksr. f/ji/ai. SATE. Field and Laboratory Blanks Field filter blanks are collected and weighed one in every ten samples with a minimum of two if less than ten filters are collected. Acetone blanks are collected and analyzed at approximately the same rate as the filters. In addition, laboratory blanks are analyzed during each batch analysis. ------- Attachment III E-6 PARTICULATES AND SULFATES ON WATER IMPINGERS General The impinger solutions are received in quart jars with Teflon lined caps. After logging sample in, the volume in each jar is measured and a 250 ml aliquot is removed for analysis. Analysis Particulates a) Total - transfer the 250 ml aliquot into a desiccated and tared 250 ml beaker, place in 90°C oven until dry. b) Organic - transfer the 250 ml aliquot into a 500 ml separatory funnel and extract 3 consecutive times with 20 ml aliquots of chloroform, collecting the chloroform extract in a desiccated and tared 100 ml beaker. Evaporate the chloroform extract to dryness by blowing a small stream of nitrogen over it in a hood. c) Inorganic - transfer aqueous portion of (b) into a desiccated and tared 250 ml beaker. Place in 90°C oven until dry. Place and leave dry beakers in a desiccator using (indicating desiccant) for at least 24 hours and until the gross weight of each beaker is stabilized. Sulfates 100 ml of deionized distilled water was added to each beaker. The beakers were swirled gently, covered with parafilm and allowed to equilibrate for 24 hours before aliquots were removed for sulfate analysis. (Described on following page.)------- - 2 - E-7 Methodology for Sulfate Analysis Sulfate analyses were performed according to Method 8 (Federal Register, Vol. 42, No. 160--Thursday, August, 18, 1977, pp. 41786-41789). Briefly, the method is as follows: Into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask was placed: 1. A known aliquot of sample 2. Deionized distilled water bringing the volume to 25 ml 3. 100 ml of isopropanol 4. 4 drops of thorin indicator This orange solution was titrated to a pink endpoint using a 0.01 N barium perchlorate solution. Each day the Ba(Cl0^)3 solution was standardized against a 0.01 N H2SO4 standard solution which had been standardized against a 0.01 N NaOH standard solution.------- AIR HCC 3 fO CUL, 0 SI SAMPLE INFORMATION FINAL RESULTS ,¦ >, ,rr PARTICULATES SULFATES rr*rm TOTAL VOLUIir ALIQUO USED SAI1PLE ALIQUO ML TITRANT z INITIAL (S04) ' J DIL ACTOR TOTAL so^ SAM VOL TOTAL SO," tt"-* TOTAL PART IC SAMPLE S DESCRIPTION BEAKER S U GROSS WT. n TARE WT NET WT \L 10 USED i ¦ i oo------- APPENDIX F PROCESS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING DATA------- rve i intsry PrOucaa PdLd Name: &:V Date: 7 / i'rn n~;1 FCC Feed ESP Primary n Secondary Amperage B Amperage rCJ2^ Primary Voltage Clock T i me Spark ruc> Oil (bbls) /yr\/rt~- A? rycfm) Cata1vst Air Feed Gas BTU val (s^'T^Cc nc o o on &JLXJ, £-2S." s^jzcs:. /p O -/•> 4 #¦¦11 mm i i i r rm i a at"------- t\t!iinery Proitsbs Data Name : 0/1 0 Dateq! & Inn I ( Clock Ti me c-> FCC Feed I* >' 0 i1 (bb1s) J Cata1yst 1 r-c- Ai r(cfm) r ' CO Bo Ai r Feed 1 er Gas BTU Val Primary Voltaqe ESP Primary n Secondary . Spark Amperaqe 8 Amperaqe Rate 0 0 0 (> /O n 0 Jjkf . *s:.. 0, (= =E . 1 i —— .. /O 0-/^0 . I V a#>. O ?. b 0 d -/ 0- %t) to c 9,5"* 0 1 /0& ~/5~0 \ & , (* O £ 0 O <5 /j/^k 6 0 0 0 l'_ ——.— /n,,v)o » ; IX ^/o . c ...,.o,5±- IP [,'1$° ,L> 0 _ f; 6 f / (5 t*t : c -x^d P 0-3?° ]H-P(0 d.V n------- I I i n-w. 7 Do^g Name: f ( Date: 7 Clock Ti me Oil (bbls) FCC Feed Catalyst ] Ai r(cfm) CO Bo Ai r Feed 1 er Gas BTU Val Primary Voltaqe ESF Primary - Amperaqe ) 1 Secondary Amperaqe fx? . Spark I Rate fbo° s % Vx o «r* 5L co / SS'SA o //d ° ° D 1—. A. It?* / & *f~ / / 6 zf* L- I P o-1fO JJaSr/y , ^ 0 — ——— .. .... tw%ag«i>ni«ii^ni" «H' ^ —t>t». hh i i mi mum r ir ¦ ¦ "TI &------- t\eiint;ry Process Daua Name: tAcfp'L D! L Date: qj Clock Ti me .n<> FCC Feed Oi1(bbls) |Catalyst 1 Ai r(cfm) CO Bo /* / -• Ai r Feed 1 er Gas BTU Val Primary Voltaqe ESP 1 Primary a Secondary Amperaqe 8 Amperage . SfFcrrk j Rct-e / d 3 1 /i y oo c /3S" ^.,rr / a c> Sf5~ o ci._ -„^£ .. C1 £>- 3i-i> n - G c> //OO 6 o ,y 6 ° <6.1 X? T o C /3% i 33 * /7Q . ... /,/3~ \& 2 3* 7?~ - £ "7?^ P ...y ^ £ ° I 0 /A & b>5b_* / "2 n 4C /-*>¦% /9 % 3.5"_. — —„——.— £ * ., L* . t,aSS. ~Jl£ ^L_ ™ — -T -HI - JUl&LL ^ o ^ 5~ ^ £ n ° j 0 i v 1/6 (a t> % o° /? 2 . O t> 0 /? ~r-?o 1 ^5" 71 1 hr™ ¦ ^ 2*<5 £ ^ 0 too r\ .------- rserinery Process Data Name: f Date: ?// y ] FCC Feed Clock j . Time |0il(bbls) ICatalyst Ai r(cfm) CO Bo AI r Feed i 1 er Gas BTU Val ESP Primary . Primary » Secondary Voltage S AmDeraqe S Amperage Spaxk Rate /oio /V7~ U 33 0 w i ¦^wnrfmfcfci m.» mi. ^ 2 IT 0 1 /^.5~ . . .. — u~ "" ¦xf , 6* y n 0 ~3 "9 <3 /oo -/S~C ^ * o j 3 ob ^^6 0 /IP. O Ofih /3 X ft P?> A /7 0 /, o h 2%* C 7 6 ^5" , ^ > O -/-r c .6 1 0 O «,—,— /-'3 ^ b ——- O 6 L> J.LiS /? 3^? & ... /y o $ .2/56 So .fC3- £ 2 3~ir ——— — £ 6 jO* -/* « o / <-/ o ° / Q o, O * /? .-?=?------- refinery Process Dai.a Name: ^ ; r- ¦' Date: * ¦ SS s C1 ock T i me Oil(bbls) FCC Feed Cata1vst 8 CO Bo Ai r(cfm) | Air Feed iler Gas BTU Val Primary Voltaqe ESP ¦ Primary a Secondary - Spark Amperaqe 3 Amperaqe § Rate /SO 0 /^°«4 /3? dJiX.t..,. /£>. £?. J /2~5~7. . __ /•> 7hi r> o - Zb ?5~ /0d-s5~O ^.y£Z~, -*s££— , -i'-.? ~ A /• o O /S -3 o L o ? & * / *2 3^ & o & /3y £ -?3A X5"~ P, HhO $0 *ir ft P.. q-vto /o O -/5~0 . ^7-^2 .. £ b ° 1 ° / i?*i Co}fo ± /'I Z> a * / ^ a , K5"~ c 2.5"d JJlJLzl££~ O ^ o 0 /&3 o (> O S , to ------- Kevinery Process Data Name: -W Q ft, o / c^. Date: Secondary - Spark Amperaqe B Amperaqe jj Rate o 0 c /3 ^5 tf « o /3l /? 3-JT 0 1 /rZ.?T.. . — — r ——*» -« i**." C ^.5jT L, 35" /¦00-/S& D 6-^-6 - 4 & <0 / 7 '3 i ^ 6 2 £}£> /3>4 /? ^ /?& /«-2 /£ XSd . ~ y 1 2 5-6 ? 5~ rSX P p-'4?0 /a i '^-<7 % i i 1 6 Q. 11 hiwii im i n rutfi aiw i n in -rj i --j_ . — .------- t>c3/ < o/t. " T ^ t- 7-/7 7 f F-8 c/t yL / 6 S 0 ° /k/st i iwe /005" p<2^' ' ...c.o Oil ££>'-'> /i, t Cs~(* /111* r<: $00 ! ^ / /2- (po % SO ^»4* j^bi* /2S o<>* I ft 6 /2Q, o o o /y^ /yz /5 30 (ptojjb d \/2^, o*c /3$ £ a Ztro^/aQ. a "\ J 3? 1/" .¦"^L y* 33^ /SS~ /'/s- ?0 ?s ,ys o o //* . & c d c o p 33J /bS /. /S~ A a 7S~ c -x^ tf 0 c> /H i b ' 6 6 Cs ft 33 ^ /£pi> / /5~ o zfo S<> , Yf ° X5$ Si? ¦ *8 0 6 //S ? &> * 0 o o A 33o Jbf /• / 5" 0 2$k fe , ^6~ £ ^S~o 1$ .Y8 0 o // I .60 0 0 D 0 ft 3 35" /0O /.3$ & 2^ $& c ^l6(> J5 0 0 /n . 6 * 0 o o l> 33 o f&s- A 2. baz* ?o .**r t 2.-=>~0 rs ------- F-9 7 / >l) - /6oo (l*2o f7oo i^OO faC{S/L 0/<- rc^^ocr 9 -/?- 7 7 £ If 3D V , ^ '3&ts c ^VaC* L' * 1 ^ 6c-~ t*'?' '^)X>SZy 6 opo o i$-7,0OD /3f A ^^?<3 no ^percaj'e 6 «£?0 ?o «KT <1 ~*=££> To •*fT t> a //r . 40 £ 0 0 0 60^00 1^000 /3~g- Q 3Lt° no /•/r & to ¦ VfT c Pb . v5^ p 0 Iff '4>0 £ O c> <0 Lcffcc /pv, 000 tSY f! 3u)o /b'f /•2. a 9%o ?o • 0 $0 , Vi""" \ C~ 2~i>'o £0 .45" b O 120 1 / £>0 / £ 0 0 ' 0 L>ofoc> Ifyooo m ft 3Z0 /<¦0 )>l£~ 6 ?7o 9o C 650 fo .f6 i | i p 0 1*0 - £>0 ¦ J » i 1 t O 0 O------- F-10 M v0jl &,L 1/nJn > ')c13o < /5 ¦"•?) /jr i'/s /oOO / o3 0 / u Va 'J d&s A i£ C/-7H Z1//? /-vc/> U £c <- &0% D<- /2 £>,0Q* {3Z /> 32 & >5 ;2/a £ P & £ 0 /KT 7$ FS /'S o /Z^ 0 O0 /3/ 4 ^3 ^ ^ —¦* /SS ^ JU<> ^ 250 P 0 £ o 7^ U / / £> o / J2 ^ooo /3I f 32 0 f/s $ 2?° t' "Z5"l 6 o i 0 ?S //5 o 6 e 5 o £' /2Y, oo <> /3* A 33 o c 26o 0 o £ 0 /&0 Z* ?S~ /// 0 !pO ^00 n% ft 3oo B 230 £ ?5"d (5 0 £ 0 /"3 0 /.Z ,/^T .Y8 , t> 6 .SS- o / a .¥3 0 . ¥# / ^ O ------- F-ll M 0 3/ O / L 7 bit- &&C S UrtOO 0« (,D%b 0 (pb bo%l>X> I flirt / 2 ^ 0 c r- a-v o o / 2 4jt * 0 /3$ /y; /3/ / 21,06* /3$ 12 y. o o« /3£ />/ r-y uoc r/4ec fr'bXv 6 2.jr«» Z_5~i> 0 C 0 £ ^ A 32.4- & 2 5 '- c- 25"d (7 £ £ o Z2 £?A & 2%^ c 2 so 0 o ' £ o ft 53 d C 2^0 I) 0 £ 0 ft p) a 0 b 2 ft 0£T //» C> o //* o /£ o $b 1>S /ft o /5° 5 a : s* I //^ c> w /-< /« o /So f 0 ?-r j/t o /< / . ys . <£> o /,( .ys .YZ .ft ,6 o . /- 0 S-" - K5" . , ^ Ci ------- F-12 (j$° c/J7 Aifsr 'Q/c &£cs m a /£'<¦ o /<_ ctbs/'7'7 CFM (2ifb0# /7//Z fee h J3*-/ U O' r/?eo i ------- APPENDIX G TEST DATA AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS------- IVH I ATeb faint BLa^/Z _ If /L v c_ fs/\o\?\iL QiL- J* *T*7-ro~ )? 0/ ! P/ue.Ttoo LaTc (~~3) I j tf«<| ^-y* "-/e* /}t-e7bf*e\ fTcf-m. I («>/g»Y I. (/*joa^\ 3V - 6 _ZZ « W 2 Rcft>A.ret> ^aLvC &L* a//C VtnL o e* ftoAJ 3 31 - £ •2.T £~5" BLA^k ..V«L if t - 17 -aS- Jt-r_ /C.r ----- /<> ~.r ?r. &r -&.r o / r -r /¦r ?.s° - 1 _*?/ 3 2.0 SU 2.T0 -1 271 5~Jl^a re I I /\oe toA^t I 9 2-Y -/ ^3 /r - / /? 6 - / 5" -I r -/ Svtf^ft C°*- R.W-J- _ *V 7* 2 -I _/. 4»rey. **>0 / To / To J2©V 7.otf 1*7 J?7- U _ _/y .ars-------- G-2 MobiL ; OiL r>^oAJ LA /9Pcl> fpoc-cbofics /IC-efoHt fr'L f^A. /?o/ *-»** / 3 2r- 3i= o I ft- W~S~ 2T-XH-Z I /<, -i/~ r *»AJ3 V? ~7*V7 foT/oL MefAol? s- Pfi6c*t>odes flczToAJt £C/*sJ) FiL |7r £ r* taU MeTkob S7+) PtedsbUAeS Accfrfyjt CIS AS h I I F/LTet I i Jr<~~p/»}e(i (e£-f) j £s~p/ff ------- G-3 'MekiL Oit- Sr/>ti°A> \ /to i £ /»*« f r ffo as /!o v ^tv/TS^TT'OA// L # A PCP P& OCebUAZ PftkTieuUiTc\C/)7*~cA (r**) Volv/mc $A/»pLeo(«*?) -0*fiScc*s7^iti 77oAj(f~*/6^y Me rf»t>_S~ ftoce t>t> £c Pfi&TTcvtrATc. C*TZA (f*j) I | ' \ Vol\v/r*e $A/*f>Lc b(r*2) C*eivce Ajffi.AT7oAJ Me tA»t> S~H) Pfi*e*bo*.c. P/tfiT/eulATr Ca7ZM (**y) Vffl'V^ryc. Srifyleb 6**?) j j j (~9r~> ce*sTA------- fc*f*>*Tex> l//>Luc PL VflLv^ fcVAJ 2 (Lfo&Tet> [/aLu-C & Lav/z y#L oe. £ w 3 ^ Cf9jtT~€b fattc BLa^K. VaL oe. flctT\>f e 7? -C 72 73 -C C7 ?Y f7 M o b i L OjL - sr^r/o/. P/1A Tecu La tc C~>) F/crrA. /r.s- —. s~ _ J 5~ n 5~ /r.y xs ~,T_ 33.y "y/'r* 9r* (•*4) / ~ r .T .s- -r e> /-T -.Y / /"yirfe* 2 9° - ? A z/ VY<* -9 V3/ *//€> -J 9*t r. ua*> r ft.UAJ 2. £vhL-3_ 0 /?o j2 71? )*YS**peA Ate ti+jc. ; -/ g> 3S~ -/ Jf W "/ i3 3/3 SvL/'ytrt (as tixSCfy ' «>} -/Wc*. 9 -/ 3 -/ y /o -/ r /?/ J9i 3T*> 3S~o 3>a o t7 JUL 9.2 7 /X 267 yrr y3s~------- G-5 i Mobil— I JT* T~to a/ /? ojz Lt\ ffaceooiLes ^7%/> T/ oass La A Pc o Ptr c c et> v*.e,i 1 1 1 Pa ft TfcvLjT* C.#TcA 0*2) V'oL v/m c. \Sa A+p£ec>\ C*~?) j ! ' t ! Ruaj J luk> 2- 9t>MJT^o \£u*J 3 ------- G-6 Plant Location Unit r/^c/c - J9o/ Run No. Vm - volume of gas metered - barometric pressure AH - average orifice pressure Tm - average meter temperature V^c - volume of water collected CO2 - concentration of CO^ C>2 - concentration of O2 CO - concentration of CO Cp - Pitot tube coefficient AP - average velocity pressure Ts - average stack temperature Ps - average stack pressure As - area of the stack Theta - sample time' An - area of the nozzle ms - weight collected H - energy input / Date r r -/. ?3" ml /P- 7 % 6 9 % c? % in HgO £? ®g"^ ' 105 BTU's ------- Plant Unit /9o/ Location Run No. / Date 1. Meter Volume Vmstd = 17'65 Vm AH Pk + 13.6 Tm ,?3 Jc.o3 + 13.6 irS'3 - 17.65 {3/'9s-) = 3o,05" Ft3 2. Volume of water collected Vw = .0472 Vu = .0472 ( fc.3) = 9 SI 6 Ft3 3. Moisture Bws ~ V(VW + ^mstd^ = J2. 2 4. Dry Molecular Weight Md = .44 (C02) + .32 (02) + .28 (N2 + CO) = .44 (/J? 7) + .32 (£?) + .28 ( ^ ) = l{j/lb-mole------- G-8 5. Wet Molecular Weight Ms ¦= «d (1 - Bws> + 18 (Bus) =Jc''^v(l -jm) + 18 (*/;2 2 ) = 2££/lb/lb-mole 6. Stack Gas Velocity ^ = (85.48) C JW~ FTs" = 85.43 (,f3 ) [0.6*) /- V ( = 9-T. 1 Ft/sec 7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (975') {zr^j) (7^3) Ts Qs - 3600 (1- Bws)/Vs As = 3600 (l- ,/-z2) (------- G-9 8. Mass Emission Ratc.5 f}. L MER = (ms) (Qs) C " TVH^JT(453TW (.00?") (sy?c C^° ) (?/- 95-) (453.59) /' $ lbs/hr A^.tg S~~ p$> KER = (ns) (Qs) c ¦ TV^JTT453T59T (¦ovy) (*«.- t-;o ) {?/¦ 9s) (453.59) ^ ^ lbs/hr £,. ~r p&£> C&&W Pig KERC : (ns) (Qs) (,j;yy) (y7yc-cc«-| p77FTT453759) / C--*- lbs/hr------- G-10 Plant Location Unit /"rc /*yo/ Run No. X ¦ 7^— J2. Date 9^4^ Vm - volume of gas metered 30.39 Ft3 P^ - barometric pressure in Hg AH - average orifice pressure yo in H20 Tm - average meter temperature •SV? °R - volume of water collected rz -? ml CO2 - concentration of CC^ // % O2 - concentration of O2 sr % CO - concentration of CO 0 % Cp - Pitot tube coefficient , T3 AP - average velocity pressure ,3T in H20 Ts - average stack temperature 9 £>2 . °R Ps - average stack pressure O in H20 As - area of the stack &3. 0 Ft2 Theta - sample time' 96 min. An - area of the nozzle , 0 oc> JL 3 ^ Ft2 ms - weight collected , cs {-r mg H - energy input 105 BTL------- Plant Unit / / Location Run No. 1. Meter Volume Vmstd = 17-65 Vm AH P5 + 13.6 Tm = 17.65 {jo.3Y) = Ft3 2. Volume of water collected ¦ 7Q 3c-o! + 13.6 srj Z ?o 4. Dry Molecular Weight Md = .44 (C02) + .32 (02) + .28 (N? + CO) = .44 (// ) + .32 (^~) + .28 ( ) = J9.?C- lfVlb-mole------- G-12 6. Wet Molecular Weight Ms = Md 0 - Bws) + 18 (BWS) = -./*?) + 18 (. to ? ) = ZT.C7lb/lb-mole Stack Gas Velocity ^ = (85.48) C JW- Ms = 85.48 {.73) ( 6Z) = Ft/sec 7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate Qs (962) (/ ( ) (2 F-Cy) = 3600 (1- Bws) As 52& ¦ Ps Ts 29.92 = 3600 (1 -./or) {?£¦>) {6s.c) "528] ?l- z ~1o.o/~ 29.92 = ST. *3 A /oC Ft3/hr Isokinetic 100 T. I = s (.00267) VLC Vm Tm bU (Ihetajj^. Hs An (p*+ &» loo (y*z>) (.00267) faJ) + (70t>< + ) (s-J?) 13.6 60 ( 90 ) ( V6-S ) {1C a / ) ( coo2.3y} _ (,2-oC + /) ~\777T~) " = 9 %------- G-13 8. Mass Emii.sion Rate.»| /}. Lfi P;t& C'OPa MER = (ir.s) (Qs) c - (Vmstd) (4537597 (o3:i ) (453.59) (Z lbs/hr &. S~ 6> MER = (ns) (Qs) C " IWi^^(453T597 (cif) (?yo pc^1) (7^ 11 j (453.59) /C lbs/hr C. M-S-fkote S~ -r pite£<*&V,iLg K„-R _ (r~'s) (Qs) hcRc ' l^jn453.59T (.061) (^° i'OC ) 3.59) {jo jyJ[453 2 5" lbs/hr------- G-14 Plant Location . <^€/ ^nlt -AT ------- Plant Unit /crr^ _ - /rc- / Location Run No. 1. Meter Volume Vmstd = 17-65 Vm AH Ph + 13.6 Tin = 17.65 0*2-95) = Ft3 2. Volume of water collected .3.0 jcol + 13>6 w = .0472 V Lc = .0472 [rj,V ) = 5 9 V Ft3 3. Moisture Bws = V= /// 4. Dry Molecular Weight Md = .44 (C02) + .32 (02) + .28 (N£ + CO) = .44 (// ) + .32 [s~~) + .28 ( ry ) = J? ?, ?6> 1 t>/l b-mol e ------- G-16 5. Wet Molecular Weight Ms = Md 0 ~ Bws) + 18 (B„s) =.29^(1 -///) + 18 (,/// ) = lb/lb-mole 6. Stack Gas Velocity ^ = (85.48) C = 5,07 Xro Ft3/hr Isokinetic 52B - Ps Ts 29.92 [528 JO'0? 29.92 100 T I = s (.00267) VLC Vm Tm TU~(THetap^r p a (p* + m 100 (9?J ) (.00267) [Fry) + ^2^ ) ~ 13.6 SO { ¥>'G) ( yC? J ( 3c* <-> /} ( (^¦cQ ( 2,23 + /m ) ( / far?) /D6 7 % ,------- Mass Emission Rate.? ft. L& frPct* P&-o &v &-e MrR = (ns) (Qs) c - T^i^n^3759T „ Uo) [5 07'~> QO° ) {72.73) \453.59) a/ lbs/hr 0. Mei'A^o s~ fxocs.t>vR-t. KER = Cn-is) (Qs) c - (Vmstd) (4T3T59T (0^7) ( "U? 73) {453.59) <2 0 lbs/hr C. M*TAo& S~ -r f>fcoC&&V&e KERC = Crr,s> (Qs) U'i') '(/J.-73) '(453.59) £ 3 lbs/hr------- G-18 Plant Location y~c Unit ycrrc - /?c u, Run No. / Vm - volume of gas metered Pjj - barometric pressure AH - average orifice pressure Tm - average meter temperature Vic - volume of water collected CO2 - concentration of C02 02 - concentration of 02 CO - concentration of CO •^p - Pi tot tube coefficient aP - average velocity pressure Ts - average stack temperature Ps - average stack pressure As - area of the stack Theta - sample time' An - area of the nozzle ms - weight collected H - energy input Date ?,//?> J? ? 3ST Ft3 7# °c/ in Hg in H^O ------- Plant Location Unit /=cc -£sr-^£&i-^ - a Run No. 1. Meter Volume Vmstd = 17*65 Vm AH Pk + 13.6 Tm = 17.65 {H.3S-) = ^ ? s?A Ft3 2. Volume of water collected ,7c> 3c-o<{ + 13.6 sr 33 w = .0472 VLc = .0472 ( 9 7. J) =------- Wet Molecular Weight Mc = Mh (1 " BWc) + 18 (Bws) =/^5"y(l -,/Jc) + 18 ) =p.2-FJ lb/ lb-mole Stack Gas Velocity = (85.48) C /ST" rs~* Ts FIs" = 85.48 [.pC ) IffC,) = y.o. 9 Ft/sec A {?6Sr ) km) ^cof) Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate Qs = 3600 (1- Bws)/Vs As = 3600 (1 -j36 ) (va7) (^t) C 52B • Ps Ts 29.92 "51§ Jo.o? 29.92 Isokinetic Ft3/hr 100 t I = s (.00267) VLC Vm Tin" 60 (Iheta^ H An (p*+ m 100 (?*>-) (.00267) {9rj) + {/o-o9 + ) — (ny ) 13.6 . 60 ( 7 C ) ( ~) ( /7/?,7 ) /07f %------- 8. Mass Emission Rate; A 7 P P~%.z2> 'V.j t , 9 -*¦"» r • / J j V«>ws>' —* •»» 4 , G-21 MERC = (ns) (Qs) (Vmstd) (453.59; (y"J (453.59} ^ Ibs/hr ,£? ^,7^ T1" .9 -<> £-, ,r >> -jP o KER (ms) (Qs) " TVS^jr(4T3T59J Ibs/hr ".''T7i«> D .3" ^°si» sj;£ Jjy ,-£*? (ras) (Qs) ------- 6-22 Unit /=cc - ^JT'- j c, c> -z. Run No. Date ?//r/?'? Vm - volume of gas metered 2 f- 7 9 Ft3 Pb - barometric pressure jc. ov in Hg AH - average orifice pressure , J?7 in ^0 Tm - average meter temperature s~9C °R vLc " vo^ume water collected ^ ml CO2 - concentration of C02 ^ % O2 - concentration of O2 ^ 9 % CO - concentration of CO £> % Cp - Pitot tube coefficient AP - average velocity pressure ..5-9 in HgO Ts - average stack temperature 9^0 °R Ps - average stack pressure o in As - area of the stack 6 ~3 c Tt2 Theta - sample time'------- G-23 Plant Location '—x, Unit /P6> Run No. Date 1. Meter Volume Vmst(J = 17.65 Vm AH Pk + 13.6 Tm = 17.65 (jz^-59) = 2 Ft3 2. Volume of water collected ¦27 f/l b-mol e ------- G-24 5. Wet Molecular Weight Ms = Md 0 ~ Bws) + 18 (Bws) =so,si(i - n) + is (,//c ) =2?^lb/lb-mole 6. Stack Gas Velocity = (85.48) Cp SI— Jin^r = 85.43 ( .70 ) (.5-9 ) / (C/ro ) V (2.9,0 r) (sooh) = yC-0 Ft/sec 7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate Qs = 3600 (1- As 52S Ts = 3600 (1- ,//6 ) (^-t) (<5*0 = t/,Vs-X(oL' Ft3/hr Isokinetic - Ps 29.92 '528 foot/ 9?o 29 .92 100 T I = s (.00267) VLC Vm Tm 60 (Ihetaj^ Ps An (P* + T3ff 100 (9TO ) (.00267) tyc) + i2££2) (*>"*+ ) ) 13.6 60 {Vo.L, ) ( 07) (?ro°z> ) (,2 0S~ % ------- G-25 8. Mass Emission Rate" , , $ «t* 4 , J J • 1 P £*- • Vj ,? > y j » r.,»r y f/N-s, , MER = (rr.s) (Qs^ c - (Vmstd) (453TW io3t) (W© c°° ) (¦XL 79)(453.59) // Ibs/hr ? .•* -ip-i "T" i?"'^ .v--5 J (ms) (Qs) m^JR453TW ) (453X9 Ibs/hr e. .r -f MER, fns) (Qs) (Vi^TTf53759y Ibs/hr------- G-26 Plant Location Unit >*yc - — x9o x. Run No. J Date %>y Z, Vm - volume of gas metered yc^C- Ft3 - barometric pressure 7c.&e/ in Hg AH - average orifice pressure in H20 Tm - average meter temperature S~j^^ °R V^q - volume of water collected £39 ml CO2 - concentration of CC^ /« 9- % O2 - concentration of 02 ^ ? % CO - concentration of CO c> % Cp - Pitot tube coefficient ,?C AP - average velocity pressure ¦ £2 in H^O Ts - average stack temperature fin As - area of the stack O- C Ft2 Theta - sample time' ?C min. An - area of the nozzle - 9j Ft2 ms - weight collected mg H - energy input " 106 BTU's ------- Plant Unit / 9 * 3- Location Run No. 1. Meter Volume Vmstd = 17,65 Vm AH Pk + 13.6 Tm 7o &c/ + 13.6 s~7'7 = 17.65 {jr,7C) = jc.9e Ft3 2. Volume of water collected Vw = .0472 Vu = .0472 {CJ-c> ) = / c 1 Ft3 3. Moisture Bws ¦ Vt*w + V,W - J. O J2. /( ?. e>2. + = 9.0?* 4. Dry Molecular Weight Md = .44 (C02) + .32 (02) + .28 (N? + CO) = .44 (/?9) + .32 (/,?) + .28 ( ?/Z ) = 11>/1 b-mol e------- G-28 5. Wet Molecular Weight Hs = Hd (1 - Bws> + 18 (B„s) = 7o.&(\ -.el) + 18 (./ IpccY) = y_2, 3 Ft/sec 7. Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate Qs = 3600 (1- Bws),Vs As 528 Ts = 3600 (1- .on ) [tfjJ) (tsc) = y/CPb Ft3/hr 8- Isokinetic ¦ Ps 29.92 "528 /r of C/?J 29 .92 100 T I « s (.00267) VLC Vm Tm 60 (Iheta)^ P An tPi + m > 100 {??/) (.00267) (63------- Mass Emission Rate" s}. L. P C >2 /*&& €•%&&& MERC = (r= { TF5^ lbs/hr C. .r ~f MER lbs/hr------- G- 30 6 / ^ ' r-^ f I C ^/^- \j- s -\ ^ \ cxi 1^0'/ ^ c-J^Lt 5w^ c~J^Le v{ -- o" ° 5^Jci-N I ,33 Z /.<0 "2- 'S^- 3 i, S o 3 ¦ ^ "* 2.,. | 4 1 , 3:5" ^ "2. /S_t7 1 IAS 5" I, I V ^ i,n "f /. Vo &-* * l.SV 3 ,/S" <\ ^.3 o 3.^7 i, l- y 1 o ; o 3,5sS 11 3 / 1 L| i i H*3 * ' \ >1 w <*lV )1 3, *' '3 l». *"*¦ i w i. H1-} 'N Q? / 3 "t- '^T 1 • i ^ (o V I Q> V.J3 l\o —) . / Vj n n ->. w V /V s-.sr i? i."? # | \ S.V/ Sr. u S . w V? "2- Q V. 2^°\ c- 0 V (s~t- ( "*- i C ,T> 0------- P LD L Plant =r Afeb. / VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS Ambient Teirp °F } ¦ Run N'o. 1 Rend and record at the start of Bar. Pre33. "Hr Location "t"CC each test point. Assumed Moisture Z /O Date ' R- 1 17 Time Start Time Probe Tip Dia. In. ^ • d (0' f-> Operator V. End Time Pitot Tube No. /C? -4 San-ple Box Ho. 2- Probe Lencth/type /6 Meter Box No. ^ Filter No. , % Meter A H 1,70 c C Factor Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H,0 AP Orifice AH in H.,0 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Tenp. T Stack Temp. °F Stack Terp. •F CF+460) Desired Actual Outlet Inlet ^7/V L t/)K /t- '' ~ £.*. 0 y C , ¦K \f* mtsr * Hir I'lZ.OO c>. *5" 1 '( O (f '(<* v\r t .O 6> / .dfor/ SoS II 0 2T o. /7 /? ( O 2C<^ I. zrr 51^4 2 2 i C .tT*? -111'. Y 3 0. 2 ^ / /& h >V V^">7 0.3 / o, 2 i 97 ?-5" (, 0 IO 2 7/ |z7j n' t z-o o i -ro& Wfc. /z- " o, 2,; 0.?-p i 7 ?>" ? 0 fL .i-CT- /W£) 7/ y o a % i n 7 0" hO 7 0 £ (o J (L(=o 72 2. 1 2 ' Y 71. o,w-i c.$ $ ?<- Y^' f.o If LfL l~ ft. •7'Y / y' / 2 Or VY S. o! o, 5 *> o V"6 c/^ f,e zC>o L -Tc .'f 1 1- -t—l /> \'l *b LiL/S -7 Z- -<5"?- O Y° ° f° 7 6 S- f.o ^ 7 266 'y/ 7zi / ^ a0,5" * o. y<* j liD " ------- Sheet of Point Clock. Dry Gas Meter, CF PItot in. H-0 AP Orifice AH in H20 l;ry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F i 1 Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet (1 / 2 / 2 - fS'0, 0 f 0 0. Z 7 0-S7 u /< O (0 ? Z7V 53.S to /2-f 7 V7r A O ?« c y* v 7 ^"2- o 75 £. 7 /• a $ C, 0,2 7 o> 7 Cll ft I! £c=y i'/y 6 2 ^ ^ v^"3. 3 7 " 33 O, c/C= 9? (, O 7! 2-rf - sy I 'li / 7 1 0.3 0 XiT <-1 & v< t. 0 7 / zee d S""2 ~\ (1 2 C Li 7. S~e> c> 30 o,v } 023 t.O 7 "l ^•c '2> [12% VsT. o u <-\ _z_6 6. 2- O O 2 0 vc- CIS~~ /, 0 7 / s'6^ i /7 ^ . zC O i-O O z 0 7 1 ! Z- -j "2_- 7^, 03, C). £ O Z5- ° - 0,0 0 3 CP^\ ^7A f CD do r>o «/ n ' Comments: ' ' 3/16/77 ------- Sheet of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Try Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet .9-a/ ///^ 9-3- . ,=?o , ~*Z> 97 <30 /, o .2.3.5" •^26 7 "r/T 25 (n jT 7 .39 ,3c 9 / 9/ / -o 7/ .575" /lr9 ^9. ,.'7^ ?2 fv /O t?-ZL P/ t.3-t isi. 9 Y ,37 ,70 ?/ Jc 7 o <7.-? ,53{? ^7^ /, C 9$~ zaS~ 3-*/ 5^ cn do CO ..'it v, Comments: 3/16/77------- Sheet of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pltot in. H-0 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460, Desired Actual Outlet Inlet ? //^ VCZ.7/ , ?/ F? / O 7^ 2.9^. sap y V7C-/S' ,515- .#?• 9o rr I a ,p,ao $Z*? C- 17P, T9 ,& 2-?~? f------- G- 34 SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET Plant: Date: 9//<,/^7 Address: Operators: /Cx—c Station No.: /-Jcc-/ : Run No.: / Ambient Temperature: -7 5~ Barometric Pressure: Sample Box Number: Impinger 1 Final Volume Initial Volume r nil Volume collected £.1. ml O ml of Impinger 2 ml of >»/-. ^ ml ^ Final Volume Initial Volume /go ml Volume collected /c ml Impinger 3 Final Volume c ml of_ Initial Volume £ ml Volume collected £ ml Impinger Final Voluffte^ ml of_ Initial Volumes ml Volume collected ml Impinger Final weight 7 ?. 5V gm of Initial v/eight -r^~^ gm qj(r p Weight collected / f ,3 gm Total Volume Collected ml Filters Weight No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected gm gm gm gm gm gm Cleanup performed by / on_------- Plant rid,:/ Z- / 9c- / Run No. Location FC C >¦<¦'? '--I 5 jq C I: Date 9 AC- /1 ~J Operator sJ t ^ » N c7 £l Sample Box No. "Z- 'L Meter Box No. Meter & H / , 7 ^ C Factor P IL/I LD 1 VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS Read and record at the start of each test point. Time: Start Tlme_ End Time / / O e = 2.f3 Ambient Ter? °F Bar. Press. "Hg_ Assumed Moisture Z f C* Probe Tip Dla. In. &< 7 ^ 7 Pltot Tube No. I / Probe Length/type /Q/ ^--/f 5* Filter No. , , / Point Clock Dry Ca3 Meter, CF Pltot In. H-0 ap Orifice AH in H20 Dry Ca9 Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven [ Temp .1 •f Probe Temp. *F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F ("F+460) K Desired Actual Outlet Inlet & A'T .< '7'\ ')/JT c ~ F'- 1 1 m •2^ '27 W ?/ /* •7-5^ to 7 JL?> l5.i (* iv '3/ 0.'5\ /.T> 7^ ft*, 2SV 50>/ &2-% 177W • f m ^7 ' 3 !e 3 b *3 /•V ~?r 24$ 2 ( J£J>0 'V >3l &/ /.v 77 /-sy 2&X 3-0 /-^ ._5D •3^ /¦V !0J> J 2Ai: w n /53V 171 OB ¦y/ «3 (fi /' D 7r n). 57^ /$ J J? 31/ 'Sb .$ r Srf //o sr? !?7 zu>i- 37> n HSh rc .n ^ «3f ^3 /•D 111 U-9 / b 1510 HZI-tz-tSHL iPi 0% ' 7 f1 J.<0 n{> /s^ Wot> -mr . 3 & ! >3 v-i /( O £^3 / 0 SV- £2? 1 Conncnts: '¦ 7 v.------- Sheet of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H-0 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. 6F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. 6F ("F+460, Desired Actual Outlet Inlet /° /J>5^ •?f .3 e ¦ 3e S2 /• ^ Z3^ >22, 7S SI • 3 f •3f /*> £' Z— y. d 2^? Z3T SZ? !bj> i> w- vf '3^ .3^ /.-D ^6}/ z?y. 5^ 7 ISy* %s- n <5° .3? '3S" £3 ! - o -237 52-z- L? 10 OO nn i g- ¦3 ^ *3C?3£~ O $Z- ez~ 2^ /GoH * H 3 «3^ $Z~ / ^ ?) 2^/7 j>*y 3 Ibbls ^7/ 07 •at -33" £3 /o 2/ j£5"Z> V?7 o )(*0 ;< r d / 0. / L o, (G 8 o go /. ^ £>9 ¦2^ (If ^ Yf 3. ^ G L-7 o, 1 '/ C\ l f/ V o 66 A o (r 6 z, ( Z- Z6' S' YPl ///£ 1 ( o. 3 0 ^ ------- Sheet 3 of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pltot in. H-O AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F l Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. ° F (°F+^.60; Desired Actual Outlet Inlet /•/rt 4 9 ^ ^ Vs- £ O &* trO &G> 27V Z.O /7/£ t?-s. /? O. 3 2 2./ mi ^ / 9 ( f.O &-T 5; e. 2 72. 5"/i. / * f 7 2° 0,^Z o. ^ 0. *-L( SI Sf l-.o C -T Z-6? S~t }t |7 2.2- H Y 7 f -y 6 O. • 0.5 7 0.3 7 AC. &< / O t Y l<~7 5LV<^ /Z- 17 J H O.Hp, 57 c<5l $? "2 e/ /, 6 z / / (%*>*¦ O, <7 y o ev Sc 8 2. f, o c3 2v^ 5^3 1 o 17 3 S ^,3 7 a i 2 // 6"/ c/ 1 17 * Ll a -2/ ^.xs' bi- /O t- ------- Sh ee t ^ o f V Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F i Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. ° F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460. Desired Actual Outlet Inlet '74b 5^-*- CK CVS22 <^2_ /,£> -ztr? i Y7 fcT/O ll o. & 2o o, 2 o «> tc 6 c-f * 57 2 c> ^cy -z-y? 3 t l^L z ?0 ------- SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET G" 39 _ , c Plant: Mol.U' (J./ £j-hnr Date: 77 AddressT / Operators: Station No.: /9c/ : Run No.: "ZL Ambient Temperature: 7:<¦ ml Volume collected & ------- Plant fOob. U OIL Run No. /Ofo/ Location T5ca>>g£. CA IL/i LD 1 VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLANKS Ambient Temp °F Read and record at the 9tart of each test point. Bar. Press. "Hg_ Date //nhl Operator Sample Box No. P- Meter Box Ko._ Meter A H_ C Factor Time: Start Titre ^ End Time Assumed Moisture 2_ Probe Tip Dia. In,_ Pitot Tube No._ /o v //c> Probe Length/type /O Filter No. S3 /. 7^ W> CffZg'L&A kCChecX@/u"/^\ OIL Point Clock Dry Ca9 Meter, CF Pitot in. H,0 A P Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. "F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Iirplnger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Tenp. '? Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. •f ('F+460) Desired Actual Outlet Inlet 4ffar ¦jfrr.fi . <#41 533, &o 4-1 tfe- 07 • 3o >93 ?" /.O (* ,lo >7$ 74 /O ILl fit. / f 4/I.t. \ 31 s ~is*> . Uk 7¥ /'0 ljT UL 'ma /r mi ill- 7"? , W .?t 1 ¦'.><* 91 ?3 i.O C< 9U> Z5V *<9 —r—* n fOOl .5^ v/ .3? ¦ i9 ?3 ?2- A 0 66 &<*? &?- !L Ioo3 .wio/ ¦L(2 .32- .3.p- ?3 ?* /¦O 67 %(, ,9^0 tpd ?£ /'0 on %Sl soon .Lft ,37 .n ?3 1/ f.O en D&i ft* ,5 >°ocl A Mo i Mo 1/ 1-0 6 7 2U ¦&! ti- (q4>! llo.9b 1.3fc q»i t'O 6^ Q£3 JH3 $33\ Consents: "' / > 6 > " " <; l - '7 ) c • ------- Sheet p~ of *-/ Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Itnpinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack. Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460) Desired Actual Outlet Inlet I'D 10/f oh^O- ¦ 41 - 3Lf r3if 23 ?/ A o 6V ¦ Ml ? /Oil o\l. .Ml <3\ <3| £3 ?/ /. o UT ^io i57 •0=2. r fofl3L ,Z7 .-C7 ?9- f,o c,? P-io -57?- L )0l3 &.L2 ,7*f ¦ PV ? . O-o ,}0 ?/ Ao 7o yf^ l°'M J? / $"» ofcefr v7 n^u ¦AktChe '7<2^ /«2-j ^(3>« ¦> i(zP\K o\ Ihs. 7C?<~ 4lf&( IS-CI 1 ' / 1 oil — ^~F -3Y ?<5 Ao ? .tit ¦vc, .37 *7 ?2, ?o i.Q 7T 2.00 or ... / CD trr, :¦¦¦' ir.-' I Comments is'" 3/16/77 ------- Shee t . */.o 77 • 2oo ,2° J 331 53 f-U- 53 */3 • VJ ?2- /¦o IT /?f SiM- /? }3 3 9 <3I-CYG ,.57 , v/ •^1 Ft- fo (.0 iT ftl ir /$*{( ^¦IX- • 55T <£T .vr ?•«- /fO i¥ (?« /£T )7 /3^3 fv- 77 i-o'Y i/3iT £z?- 13 /^3"/ <3LtO , ^ M3 S3? ffO 7 ??" /. 0 7? /ft IO /iO <31 & ,
20-c /5"^ ^52- f— ? Hof - .r M ------- Sheet f/ of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Fitot in. H-0 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F 1 Oven J Temp .1 °F Probe Temp. °F* Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet L mo*? <% S7 ,£T^ .y^. y^- 7b S? /•o 9t ¦ ff-U Si'/ < Mm ^lT-1 , £2- yp- -y^ ?£> (>& P/ Iff tS'f <7 4- a 'Hot .4^ •3? . 3f S7 S5? )'G ,?/ /y? 3 Htl <13.& ,yr 36, , 56 ?o f-O 5=/ l?3 >l!7 4h\ NI-3 . 3Z ,-3Z. To ho Mtt > LtZt-,, wS"A '? = Oh /Cr^\ ) ** (T rr\ j o& :> y*1- ^ Comments: oj 3/16/77------- SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET PI ant 'if,i,fr £,/ Date: /C,~ 7 7 f/UA-. Address: iT^T 7 Operators: Station No.: /*?c '/ : " Run No.: Ambient Temperature: ~pj~ Barometric Pressure: cf Sample Box Number: ^ Impinger 1 l±3 Final Volume • ml of A1 . Initial Volume /&o ml Volume collected ml Impinqer 2 Final Volume III ml of f/d Initial Volume /oo ¦ ml Volume collected (J ml Impinqer 3 Final Volume O ml of Initial Volume ^ ml / J Volume collected o ml Impinqer v Final Vol-ume ml of jjTie _ _ _ Initial Volfrme ml Volume collected ml Impinqer N Final weight L gm of (-------- G- 45 £ \ oXL I h ciU^ ^jLt ^J~ £Llr,\ O ji ^3 3 ;,s v=» W /<=! W H 2-. ' ( 6" l.l* 5" 2,35" /, HI fr ~L ,£^\ 1 1 t b V i, * i,sy fr "3, i £ 3 . W~> 3,3^ 1 O i - i, i* V 11 H . 31 ) i 3 . ' W 11 W ^ v il 3 .£ / /3 C> . VI '3 z> , ^ ^ > M ) W Cw 3 T- » b" t ,*1 s" ' ^r fei"? y ? 0 / (* V.33 "7 .Ho 11 "/, W V n /V 1 ">s 1 y ^ /°> iS -) 1/ > \ V.QH 20 M<| ^0 "i 1 ¦5 .s"L X 1 ^ < (i>c1 » w \ V- V ~Ll V-w 1-3. h ~i- 3 i O , 1 1 ~^Ll S,/3 T_ V ' o ,3 O ------- "2-, Plant Run No. £ 7y /?c ¦ Location 9//^=r / c r sr trfZkr y:23 rfzcq < ^ 7? F* ?7 77 /j$~7 /?f 5~o? Po V/T* sr.1ro.71 M- -37 *7 ? ~ rr/.if 3 • /V .39 ,3? 7 tr \ yy /¦c 97 /4-Y An .7/1 9: *7 rO'/y •V9 ,39 | .3 9 7s- 77 /¦C 7.r A5T /77 17 9:3 9 sy ,3 9 3? 75- 77 7 £¦ 1 Consents: /"=}5< £«. 3 cn i CT> ------- Sheet .5. of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. ° F Stack. Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460; Desired Actual Outlet Inlet II/ fc 4Try?T S~6 3. &> / r;*9> 96 Hi . Jc ,-a.Y 7a 7^ / c 6 *7 /W /7r — • f Vr *7" "2 <6-^/ it 7 ,1'7 ,30 . T o 7^ 72- /¦C 67 /r/ /?e VF ------- Sheet J"> of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temo. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460> Desired Actual Outlet Inlet r? CL r.sr'f 76S~r , r?T , a r ,2r 9 1 7.ZL Ac £r • Ar? /?o 9?T> £ / *!ffr09 ,37 , f*o 73 7:3. / c 49/ .37 , ^0 ,3 r 7/.I /f 6'CCL t 73 /t? *? , a*-/ /.5-J5" ¦5~J2 JT IC frit t ,3S~ ,.7(7 ,a ° yO 3- Co f ( U - ?/r.J V'/5'> 0 1 CO ------- Sheet ¥ of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H~0 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F t Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+A60; Desired Actual Outlet Inlet 7 r j? a^r 73 / O 7S> £t'T7^ /V7 ^7c* 2 4-77. /c- ,/'7 . /'/ 73 7n / r> /V7 ^-<5- f Cz'7>(s r / S77.3.2 0. &{ tf.of C C0/ '73 7^ /? c 6? n^c f?7 L¦ -trAl r r/f tc/r /?7£ ~ /& '//«- C /( - c/ ~/r^ / \ \ 4 0 Comments: 3/16/77 ------- SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET G_5° Plant: Date: 7? Address: Operators: Station No.: : Run No.: >=* f Ambient Temperature: -yg Barometric Pressure: Sample Box Number: / Impinger 1 Final Volume Initial Volume II2^ ml of cM Volume collected_ Impinger 2 Final Volume '(Cn Initial Volume Volume collected_ Impinger 3 Final Volume /€• c O Initial Volume J2_ Volume collected_ Impinger Final Initial VoTC Volume collecteft^ Impinger Final weight 7^-7.3 Initial weight LL Weight collected -? Total Volume Collected_ Filters ??¦* No. Final Weight Cleanup performed by ml j 1% ml /&'? ml of cfd . t w yZ- _ml ml _ml of _ml ml ml of _gm of x c -* _gm _gm "7 ml gm _gm Tare Weight gm gm on Wei ght Collected _gm gm------- p.. -j-'t LD Plant Run No. ,Zl /7& ? Location — y —^ T— ^te y//rA\^ . 7 '/r> ¦ 3^ Operator s7' / VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN ALL BLAJTCS Read and record at the start of each test point. Time: Start Time End Time Ambient Temp *F 7 & Bar. Press. "Hg Assumed Moisture 2 /C? San-ple Box No._ Meter Box No. 9 / 2 Meter A H /. 7 X* Probe Tip Dla. In. , £Z// Pltot Tube No. / O ~ Probe Length/type /P/~7~~ Filter No. , , c =• 71,-3* Cj Factor ¦JZL Point Clock Dry Cas Meter. CF Pltot In. H20 AP Orifice AH In HjO Diy Cas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Irrplnger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. "F Stack Temp. °F CF+460) Desired Actual Outlet Inlet P/1 ' 4 s (Ai /t" / 'S. tr / ?L?g------- Sheet of ¦*'^ — Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H-0 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. ° F (°F+460; Desired Actual Outlet Inlet // /c'.c'f 5?7.'7'F ,3/ V >*~ fo ^rr. 33 ,z>r >7? ro /.O 73? JcAn J 3 //O ,/<> T9 / o 7Jr At? /3o f /c:2f r?pf/o £ . ' / s- ?H //'o7 -* T— tc '.r? J9>ir 1 7? n f, o ^3^ /? ------- Shee t J? of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460: Desired Actual Outlet Inlet //o'9 5-13.9^ ,*/D , 3) .3/ 76 ¦ /?/ //// s?y. .L/C ,3 ! ,3/ 73 9V /¦c 70 ?*7 ¦2c /n/.2 3/ /ie/.S 9 ,VX ,37 #7 91Z %2 /O ?? . J*$~£ $~Vc // //'33 CC/.91) ,?r ,37 ,3*7 92. /¦C 77 .2/9 S~3 3 10 //; ?.v * f— ,37 -37 ?* 72 /o 7? . a J~3 sras} ? //3? - W ¦ ( " V3 ^ .it ,37 ,i? ?Z | 92 f-o 7? 2-Y9 /a.r Comments: /0.-7 ^ c,vi ;) 7°t'i •' I c_n CO 3/16/77 ------- Sheet 7 of Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F < Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. ° F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet T //~7 &&9. o7 ,3.5- / 3,-T- ? a sy /.ST.-3J2 6 //•'93 6o 7 ?* ?/ /.o ?r JT/2 3 //:*/ 6o>z?& ,.2.3 ,,2.7 9:2 ?/ /.° PS" <&7 fjr I //:^3 6 c r. 23 / C> S? . £\T , osr ?z> ?/ /, c pr ayy po Yfo f rA <°c/— St9~ // /*r & - o oC" c. s 3/16/77 ------- G-55 SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET Plant: OtL~ Date: Address: -rDfZtfa-^c.E C.ft Station No.: /?"£> Impinger 1 Final Volume Initial Volume /£~ 3 ml of /-Z-£^d Volume collected_ Impinger 2 Final Volume /DO _ml ml Initial Volume /Q C- ml of /4 Volume collected_ Impinger 3 Final Volume /'<9^> ml ml Initial Volume Volume collected Impinger FkiaI_Volume InitialYo £/fry _ml ml ml of J^nn ml of Volume collected Impinger Final v/eight_ Initial weight Weight collected_ Q (7-0 9m _gm of ^i Li c.ff (s>^7 Total Volume Collected *7^,6 ml Filters No. Final Weight JZ. _gm jgm Tare Height gm gm Weight Collected _gm _gm Cleanup performed by .j------- Plant_ rQ^bXe DiL. Run No. >9oX -P^3 Location Date 9// g/37 Operator Sarple Box No, ! Meter Box No._ ,9- Heter A H C Factor / 78" P lL/k .D I VERY HtPuRTANT - FILL IN ALL BLA.VKS Read and record at the start of each test point. Time: Start Tiire_ End Time MoZ u\ Ambient Temp *P 2£L Bar. Press. "He Assumed Moisture Z Probe Tip Dla. In._ J2=- LL Pitot Tube No. /O ~2— Probe Length/type / Filter No. 2,. /33c /^aK CshzcKCsfr /&"//*>- oil Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pltot in. II-O iP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. *F Probe Temp. *F Stack Temp. #F Stack Temp. *F (°F+460) Desired Actual Outlet Inlet 7^7 CoS"?X i /yo? Co?. 38 . .5 .Uo .Ik .t/O .34 <37 ?3 ?2- AO 73 .22 mn Uoni • 3^ -3^ 93 ?' / o 77 t£L J^P- /V/< u Ml . Vo r> ?/ f.o 1< c»C- i?n 2!X1 521 t? M? LU 11 •5"/ M$ M$ fT2- f.o 7<-> w- /r Nv u \3. G 5" '^2- L/C/ Mi s^- So }-o 77 /JY /2/. &! 17 m\°> km.v? W7 Mo MO ?o (O -7? ?Of. //? M3o fC £/.<<*/ 43 MO ,w J-0 f.o 7^ /# >M d5>\ /.< IV Ll &KYY .13 i3 c\ 3 1^31 (,A1* 7-9 , ^£? M0~ \ MI- s>i n? AO 7^ fO-L <3< n 1 1 1^3 Cffioz .4/ MI i W3 1-0 7? /?o <^7 n )^b 61?. 7 3 -V? 1 .11 1 4/ 57 "77 bo 1 17 py 7( ,43| 'I(jf ------- Shee t J- of / Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 A P Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (° F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet (O my Ct?x/q 'L't .#> ,yo ?( 1? f.C) 7? • I?1 % £i(f ? to? LI? , L/o .w ?o 7 7 Ao So /?? 7.3 &! ? ,1! .3? T/ ha /PtT n 51/ 7 kw L1I. eo 17 Ao Po n?. K 3 11 M7 .^0 >LfZh 7? /. 0 sb /?sT V y l<4tf £>p.3n3 ¦ Po 7§" ho Po '7"T &o 2 .31 ,3\ 31 fb ts* AO If m ?/ / /*rr <*X HL .17 ./V ¦/V 1? /• O 7S" l?o IPo /$? m 7/^/7? ,i2 11 1<° ho Q? PfL XP • *• 23 / ho L Hi V 5©7 7-3- /<36 G91.% .3r ¦3^ ¦ 3T- ~i~> ~tU t" o="" c?="" of="" 5="">c> 1 on 3/16/77 ------- Shee t of V Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Pitot in. H20 AP Orifice AH in H20 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp, °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+A60 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet P» .6-2?.^ MO 3&?? ,3V .3/ 7£> 7jT /rO 7o J?>"C /0(j 515' /P- /**/6 7^ (, O 7o ^£7 M J>5i" n /P/J* L3I. /? Wo -3 A a If m ?r 12- /&JU ,vr .3?- , 3? 1r /.o if p 10 1 ?< /^r &3y- 51 ¦ r ho K . ?o~7 p /W ? /£------- Sheet if of 4 Point Clock Dry Gas Meter, CF Fitot In. H20 AP Orifice AH in H-0 Dry Gas Temp. °F Pump Vacuum In. Hg Impinger Temp. °F Oven Temp. °F Probe Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F Stack Temp. °F (°F+460 Desired Actual Outlet Inlet 6 K*°T -13 74, 75" /' O 7 C? *37 /UO C3?-15~ .£7 .3-3 • 23 74 7/6/V (°3?.l ¥ J? '1? 7 Co 7fT ho ?/ 2. IC/L CVo.n ¦1? > . /6 7 *5" 7/ ho ¦zjgH / /op' UJO. 2-1 C> O 7^ 7^ f-O 7J Pd IU?i 3 //£» K' :24->ecJ^ /C- V f*} — ,c -J CD ioi i'yi Tvi * Comnents: 3/16/77------- SAMPLE CLEANUP SHEET Plant: COntM.e.O;L. Date: J?//5? /~T~> Address: ^ A- Operators: Station No.: ftp &. ^ : 2^^-LL Run No.: G-60 ^ Barometric Pressure: d>c*/ _Ambient Temperature: >"• 5 _Sainple Box Number: / Impinger 1 Final Volume /ml of Initial Volume ml Volume collected TV ml Impinger 2 Final Volume /OG ml of T^>\ Ll rsd /-A-.Q Initial Volume /_QjQ_ml Volume collected £ ml Impinger 3 Final Volume ^ ml of Initial Volume ^f*\ Volume collected Impinger ml of Initial VoTuTft Volume collected Impi nger Final v/eight (. 6 *-/. qm of *^7t.iC./f Initial weight ^<"6^ gm Weight collected ?,y gm Total Volume Collected ml Filters Weight No. Final Weight Tare Weight Collected If}' _ gm gm gm _ gm gm gm P*o6. Cleanup performed by fr /X/ AZ4. f.L-i on v/tf------- cov'Avy rHfilL n lccaticV^SEEEE Tf cr r "115 - r.' c_ TEST IiLI'^SIP.* PATE c\ !/ uj-7 7 OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE OF OBSERVER /? ft A TYPE FACILITY n: J 1 -f ¦s f i « 1V 1' X 1 r- -r > V & T 7 1 I 1' 1 & L 1 10 ] . 11 [ 1 13 I u !:> I 10 W - •' IS 1 'll L 1 1 '£? : 3 I c- I ; 0 I n ?/ i 1 23 • 1 OBSERVATION RECORD (Continued) fAGS OF cox?a\t LOCATIOM TEST li'J-ISER OATE OBSERVER type rAcirrrr—; POINT CF EXISSIWT So cords STEAM PLU.'.t 'cScc'< 1 f flpnl tcfblel Mr. 0 15 ¦15 Atiichcd [ictjcftod CO'WE'.TS 1 30 31 ?? j3 M 3'j 3o, 37 38 H '•0 •11 « ) ¦U 15 •ir. AY, N'OVEM&Eft 12, 1974 ------- COMPAKY M oftl1- 6/c LOCATICN 7~6 (Z £ /Q A'C test iiu::BcR / y//c/-7 -? ~ RECORD OF VISUAL DETCWIMTIOK Of OPACITY PAGc cf DATE 9? ~rr- TYPE FACILITY_/£C<^ COIITROL DEVICE .<> Z7 URS OF OBSERVATION OBSERVER fit?//* AS OBSERVER CERTIFICATION DATE ft-zr-y -> 03SERVER AFFILIATION c-V/P - /u^-7c POItiT OF EMISSIONS HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE FOINT j= r \AJS5T i T s<- ClOCK TIME OBSERVER LOCATIOfi Distance to Discharge Direction from Discharge Height of Observation Point BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION LEATHER CONDITIONS Kind Direction Vllnd Speed Ar.blent Temperature SKY CONDITIONS (dear, overcast, % clouds* etc.) PLUME DESCRIPTION Color Distance Visible OTiiLi i:ifor:iatioi! Initial /*<17 Final /jfy? a 5 sp' WEbT # ' / ^OUTl^-' \$r -x* r-r SUTCttRY OF AVERAGE OPACITY Set h" umber Oocc1ty Start--End Svn j/vfrege i Readings ranged fro.n to % opacity The source v/as/was not 1n ccnpllance with the time evaluation was irade. at------- OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE .OF. cov?A>;r LCIATIC'; r < f< fi A A-r t c- TYPE f/iClUTl Y /Ten 7l5T ,vjy2 -:k f r'Oilii CI- WlSSlOiiS P/iT E .... c!/" 1 ! 1 j^: T 0 ,47 a i) n Si) , SI s> b3 55 50" 5 7 58 59 1 jrn Do; 74-201 10 riicd 11-11-74,11.4} taj KDZZAl WCIITEJ, VOL 39, NO. 219—.TUESDAY, NOVLMBI5 12, 19r< ------- recow of visual, di'zmmm of opacity" PAG" c? a rt 5 O r o > -< O < COMPANY AJPfi/C c>( c lOCAT ICtt fapf/? A-'c c T COIUROL DEVICE ^ HC'JRS OF 03SERVATI0!I_ OBSERVE Z_Jz/i£Aju c. , 6>A Si? OBSERVER CERTIFICATION DATE ^/sr/7 7 OBSERVER AFFILIATICff - A-'d~/ c POIliT OF EMISSIONS <; t*Initial t oi 3 / cy% Fir.al 3 o*> ?7 /? " Zo* r'c be l fS <-= £> c> <3 >'/<¦ / S/& T / ^ "SCLi (.iWt? i^jrfC uJ/// U'tt- >rlr si yo FT /0/3-/Z& SUGARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY Sot fiurr.ber T{ rn Opacity Stort--End Sun fvi*rz ge I Readings ranged from to % opicisy The source was/was not la ccnpliance with tM the tlir.e evaluation was /racie. at cn CTi -P* ------- OBSERVATION RECORD page: / OF / )V?ASY UOl, j t- D^ATIC'i Tp PR A & C0V?A lc: T£3T US'Zlk WTE -7-7 OBSERVER AV^ TYPE FAClllTY ffe.r>fl/CRY POINT CF H^ISSXO.iS s~rAkl> /Iste L-" /C-1 st fcrtfi/e^v I'r. ".In. Soceif1; STEAM CLU.'.t (ch"c'' ' f ? rnl Icabl c) COMMENTS u n 5. 3" <0 cd Pcuc^d IKZOi 0 \J> 1 > 1 JO J nj-i 1 1 \jo\s _£ juv ? uri/o j? jr j c. Jo sr /o t'iM J1 Jjr I 5 Mo 13" jr Lr c, \/o\jr io £ 1 I1 1 f 1 1 1 c ! 1 1 l'j 11 I* — — 13 1 1 K ll UT~ 17 — ! 1 — t - • ") 1 IS 1 — .:il 1 1 11 1 — Ic?' 1 v. <.3 £;_ t 0 /n 1 — r^r 1 ?/ 1 1 ?8 1 1-9 • i compavv lOCAriOH TEST UVASER DATE OBSERVATION RECORD (Continued) ODSERVER type FAcinrr PACE OF, POIIIT OF EMISSIONS Ilr. Mil. Seconds STEAM PLU.'.t (c'leck 1 f oonl tee Me) CO'IVc'JTS 0 lt> JO ¦15 Attached CJl* tac^od 1 30 31 .>3 .n 35 3 (J , 37 31 33 '.U ¦11 <-.3 d 1 15 .ir» -.7 CO 50 51 5? 53 54 55 56" 5 7 53 , 69 irn DOC7V-20150 Filed 1J-U-7*,U:4J km| ip cr, U~i r:o:zAi register vol 39, no. 219-*tuz;:>ay, novembr 12, i?74------- COMPANY M Q& /£- LOCATION test nu::cer DATE F.ECORD Of VISUAL DuTC^UHATIOK OF OPACITY PAGc_ HOURS OF OBSERVATION Cf TYPE FACILITY COIiTROL DEVICE OBSERVER OBSERVER CERTIFICATION CATE_ OBSERVER AFFILIATION POIliT OF EMISSIONS HEIGHT OF DISCHARGE FOINT CLOCK TIME OBSERVER LOCATION Distance to Discharge Direction from Discharge Height of Observation Point BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION ViIATHER CONDITIONS Kind Direction Wind Speed Anblent Temperature SKY CONDITIONS (dear, overcast, % clouds, etc.) PLUKS DESCRIPTION Color Distance Visible OTlICa IHFOOTIOIl Initial Final IZ3U* P- j/d/ SlftWARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY Sot h'uir.ber Oosci ty Start--End S'jn J/vrcge 1 " ! ' Readings ranged from to opaciiy The source vws/was not in ccnpliance with the time evaluation was made. at CD I CT> Ch------- OBSERVATION RECORD COv?AS"C Mofi/C o/c LC-ATIC\ 7~~e> t' f-'\ /) aj< i.< TEST J,JxaltT TATE . '1// 7 PAGE OF, OBSERVER /? £/)-& TYPE FACILITY ' C'liS FOl.'iT CF EMISSiC IV. s? CC"l'i * ST LAM I'LU.'.E (cH?c'' If ?rr>Hc2b1o) ".!n. 0 | 1 5 31;7 ! 1' c _ 1 I'J 11 12 i 1 13 1 - !- 11 1 1 1=> 10 - 1? ! is c 11 1 1 1 \y :i 1 t~ 1 10 /t> ?> ?h 1 29 • 1 OBSERVATION RECORD (Continued) PAGE OF cox?A\y I OCA MOM TEST JiU'-iSEK DATE OBSERVED TYPE rACinT? POINT CF E^.ISSTWT Hr. mi. Sccords STEAM PLlMt 'c'leek If .isnl fc.'b1e) CO'lVENTS 0 lb JO <15 Attached Detached 1 30 31 3? j3 (1 3'j — Jo 37 jn "H y.u 'ii ' ------- COMPAKY // 6 tf/C O /->~ z* Cd(7A-£ aM rrc~ -pr/T SUM'ttRY OF AVERAGE OPACITY Set number TV" Owelty Start--End Sun t vrags 1 Readings ranged fro,n to % opacity The source vws/was not in ccnpllance with the tlir.c evaluation was rcadc. at o tr> 00 ------- OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE . OF ft g cov?A\-y LCCATIC'l' TEST h'S/ZTK, CAT£ —y/y-7 ? 6 o /< -rfl i- ajc.1e) M'n t-' 1 3f *> 1 I < 5' y 1 ? I<1 v- -i \ J 2- c <> > "1 J 1 T < Y KO KDCRAl KIG1ST£2, VOL 37, NO. 219—TUZ5DAY, UOVVAZZZ 12, 1974------- RECORD OF VISUAL DET^IIKATIOK Of OPACITY PAGc cf COMPAKY A? o £>/<- LOCATICN -r * A A /a */c,<* TEST NUMBER ?//,?/'? 7 TYPE FACILITY _£CL c! CONTROL DEVICE HOURS OF OBSERVATION. S9 OBSERVER l&tf/sfAJ /Q/I $,/)<¦.< a /=? <£/}?t * rA G/< CLOCK TIKE OBSERVER LOCATION Distance to Discharge Direction from Discharge Height cf Observation Point BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION VTATHER CONDITIONS Kind Direction Wind Speed Anbient Temperature SKY CONDITIONS (clear, overcast, % clouds, etc.) PLUME DESCRIPTION Color Distance Visible OTIlta UIFOOTIOH Initial ' Final 2. <30 5V£" O s/3-3" 7fT e<-cr/?A t.V// 1 0 t /=. r~ SUGARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY Set Number •rw Ooacity Start--End Svn leverage , = =. T. 1 Readings ranged from to % opacity The source v/.is/was not in compliance with the time evaluation v/as rcade. at-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT EP A-330/2-77-026 a Emission Tests Mobil Oil Corp oration Torrance, California (September 1 2-1 3, 1 9 7 7) NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER DENVER. COLORADO AND / £%* REGION IX, SAN FRANCISCO I DECEMBER 1977 (Revised - March 1978) ------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Enforcement EVA-ZZO/2-77-026a EMISSION TESTS MOBIL OIL CORPORATION Torrance, California (September 12-13, 1977) December 1977 [Revised March 1978] National Enforcement Investigations Center - Denver and Region IX - San Francisco ------- CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 2 III PROCESS DESCRIPTION 5 IV TEST PROCEDURES 8 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 8 TEST METHODS 10 PROCESS MONITORING 13 V TEST RESULTS 14 FIGURES 1 FCC Unit Diagram and Air Pollution Controls 6 2 Source Testing Locations, FCC Units .... 9 TABLES 1 Data Summary - FCC West Stack, Station 1901 18 2 Data Summary - FCC East Stack, Station 1902 19 3 Particulate Data-LAAPCD Procedure 20 4 Particulate Data-Method 5 Procedure .... 21 5 Particulate Data-Method 5 (+) Procedure . . 22 6 Process Data Summary 23 7 Visible Emission Observation 24 8 Continuous Monitoring Data FCC West Stack, (1901) 25 APPENDICES A Presurvey Inspection Report B Sample Train Construction Details C Calibration Procedures and Data D Chain-of-Custody Procedures and Records E Analytical Procedures and Data F Process and Control Equipment Operating Data G Test Data and Example Calculations ------- I. INTRODUCTION The Mobil Oil Company operates a 20,700 m3 (130,000 bbl)/day integrated crude oil refinery in Torrance, California. On November 6-7, 1975, a process inspection was conducted by National Enforcement Inves- tigations Center (NEIC) personnel to evaluate the facility compliance with the Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District (LAAPCD)* regulations. One recommendation of this inspection was that the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit particulate emissions be source sampled. Based on this recommendation, Region IX of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested NEIC to source test the FCC particulate emissions. On July 12, 1977, NEIC personnel performed a presurvey inspection to determine if the FCC emissions could be sampled [Appendix A]. It was concluded that sampling was feasible if minor modifications were made to the sampling platforms on the two (west and east) FCC stacks (Stations 1901 and 1902). During the period September 14 to 18, 1977, the FCC emissions were tested to determine the compliance with LAAPCD Rule 52, which limits particulate emission concentrations from Stations 1901 and 1902 to 83 3 and 88 mg/m (0.036 and 0.038 gr/scf), respectively, and Rule 54 which limits the total emission rate from both stacks to 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr. Visible emission observations were also made and compared to the LAAPCD Rule 50 (Ringlemann Chart) which limits visible emissions to less than 20% opacity, except for excursions of not more than three minutes in any hour. * The Agency title has since been changed to Metropolitan Zone} South Coast Air Quality Management District; however> EPA has not yet approved all State Implementation Plan revisions. The LAAPCD regulations are considered applicable by EPA. ------- II. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Between September 14 and 18, 1977 particulate source tests were conducted on the two FCC stacks of the Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance Refinery to determine compliance with LAAPCD Rules 52 and 54. During this period, the FCC process feed rate averaged 3 million kg (6.7 million lb)/hr and no significant process changes were noted. The ESP instrument readings showed that one ESP field was not operating and another was malfunctioning. 2. Test results were interpreted using the following definitions: LAAPCD - Inorganic particulate less sulfates (as h^SO^ "2 b^O) collected by the filter, acetone wash and impingers 1, 2, and 3). Method 5 - Particulate collected at a temperature of 120°C (248°F) by the filter and acetone wash. Method 5 (+) - Particulate matter as defined by Method 5 plus the nonsulfate (as H2S04 '2 H^O) parti- culate collected by impingers 1,2, and 3). Based on the LAAPCD definition, the particulate concentrations measured at Stations 1901 and 1902 (37 and 83 mg/m ) were less 3 than the LAAPCD Rule 52 which allows 83 and 88 mg/m , respectively. The mass emission rate (16.1 kg/hr) exceeded the Rule 54 limit of 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr by 18%. If, however, all the errors inherent in the test procedure are cumulative, these errors could affect the results by an estimated +20% of the actual emission rate. ------- 3 Further during the tests, one of the five ESP fields was shut down and a second was operating erratically; this could account for the emission rate being above the allowable rate. As indicated below, the west FCC stack particulate concentrations determined by the Method 5 and Method 5 (+) definitions comply with the 83 mg/m^ (.036 gr/scf) limitation, but are 46% and 84% greater than the LAAPCD concentration results (37 mg/m3 or 0.016 gr/scf). The mass emissions are 49% and 83% greater than the LAAPCD results, respectively. Average Particulate Concentration mg/m gr/scf LAAPCD West Stack East Stack TOTAL Method 5 West Stack East Stack* Method 5 (+) West Stack East Stack* Allowable Emissions West Stack East Stack TOTAL 37 83 54 69 83 88 0.016 0.036 0.024 0.030 0.036 0.038 Average Mass Emission Rate kg/hr Ib/hr 5.3 10.8 16.1 7.9 9.6 11.7 23.7 35.4 17.4 21.4 13.6 30.0 * Testing at the east FCC stack (Station 1902) was performed using an unheated probe which does not meet Method 5 requirements; therefore, the results were not interpreted using the Method 5 or Method 5 (+) definitions of particulate. ------- Visible emissions from the two FCC stacks never exceeded 15%. These emissions are less than LAAPCD Rule 50 which limits the emissions to less than 20% opacity. ------- III. PROCESS DESCRIPTION The Mobil Oil Company produces fuel gas, LPG, aviation gasoline, motor gasoline, jet fuel, distillates, fuel oil, weed oil, sulfur and coke. The refinery, which was modernized in 1967, employs about 600 people and operates three 8-hour shifts, 7 days/week, year round. Major processes used at this refinery include crude desalting, atmospheric distillation, vacuum distillation, delayed coking, catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, catalytic reforming, hydrotreating, alkylation, hydrogeneration, hydrogen production and sulfur recovery. A brief description of the FCC process and air pollution control equipment are provided below.1 Spent catalyst in the FCC unit is continuously removed from the reactor portion and introduced through piping into the catalyst regener- ation portion [Figure 1]. Here the petroleum coke, tars and other residual deposits which form on the catalyst surface are burned off. The recovered catalyst is then recycled to the reactor. Catalyst particles which are entrained in the exhaust gases are captured by a series of cyclones internal to the regenerator unit and returned to the regenerator. The regenerator unit exhaust gases contain carbon monoxide, parti- culate matter, aldehydes, sulfur oxides, ammonia and oxides of nitrogen. In order to minimize the carbon monoxide (CO) emissions and to recover the fuel value of this material, the regenerator exhaust gases are combusted in a waste heat boiler. The CO boiler exhaust gases are then passed through a two-chamber Buell electrostatic precipitator (ESP) 1 State Implementation Flan Air Pollution Inspection of Mobil Oil Company, Los Angeles County, California, EPA 330/2-76-011, February 1976} page 8. ------- Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Reactor Catalyst Combustion Gases Regenerator Foster-Wheeler Carbon monoxide Boi1er Figure 1: Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance, Calif. FCC Unit Diagram and Air Pollution Controls Stacks Sample Platforms Buel 1 Electrostatic Precipitator note: Capital letters of ESP indicate individual sections with separate controls ------- 7 consisting of five fields (labeled A, B, C, D and E) [Figure 1]. Each field is composed of two electrical sections with one transformer- rectifier(T-R) set/field. This ESP uses ammonia injection, i.e., ammonia gas is injected into the inlet gas stream to the ESP to improve the ionization of the gas. Each chamber of the ESP is equipped with its own stack. ------- IV. TEST PROCEDURES SAMPLING LOCATIONS Particulate emissions from the FCC unit at Mobil Oil's Torrance Refinery were tested from September 14 to 18, 1977. Three test runs were performed at each of the following locations: FCC West Stack - Station 1901 FCC East Stack - Station 1902 The two 2.7 m (9 ft) diameter stacks have identical geometries, sampling platforms, ports and accesses [Figure 2]. The sampling ports are 6.4 m upstream of any flow disturbance. There are four 10 cm (4 in) ports (north, south, east and west) located at 90° intervals around the stack. Lugs (padeyes) are located 1.8 m (6 ft) above the east and west ports. The sampling platform is located 0.9 m (3 ft) below these ports. The west stack (Station 1901) is equipped with an Environmental Data Corporation (EDC) continuous monitor for sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitric oxide (NO). This monitor uses a 20 cm (8 in) diameter 1.8 m (6 ft) long slotted tube to maintain optical alignment and to reduce sample path length. The tube is located 0.8 m (2.5 ft) downstream of the sampling ports and 10° to 15° to the right of the south port. A preliminary velocity traverse conducted on September 15 indicated that no aberrations in measured velocities occurred at any traverse points. It was concluded that the slotted tube did not cause a flow disturbance at the sampling location. ------- Lugs 6 ft Above E&W Ports Lugs 6 ft Above E&W Ports (9 ft) (9 ft) 4-10 cm ports SC^/ N0X Analyzer c± Z 4-10 cm ports 3 ft) 8.2 m (27 ft) Sampling platform Note: Both stacks have identical geometries West Stack East Stack Figure 2: Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance, California Source Testing Locations, F.C.C. unit. ------- 10 TEST METHODS Particulate testing was performed according to the procedures specified by Method 52 with the following exceptions: 1. As a result of equipment malfunction, all tests at the FCC east stack (Station 1902) were conducted with an unheated stainless steel probe. Probe temperatures were monitored and ranged from 38°C (100°F) to 93°C (200°F). 2. During the FCC west stack (Station 1901) testing, probe and oven temperatures occasionally were below the specified range of 107° to 135°C (225° to 275°F). 3. The contents of impingers 1-3 were retained and analyzed for particulate (organic and inorganic) and sulfate. In accordance with Method l2, 48 points were sampled during each run, 24 points on a diameter. Sampling time was 2 minutes/point for a total of 96 minutes. The south and west ports of each stack were used. All sampling runs were structured to provide a sample volume of 849 dry std. liters (30 dscf). Actual sample volumes ranged from 781 to 891 dry std. liters (27.6 to 31.4 scf). The sampling train used was the Model AP 5000 manufactured by Scientific Glass, Inc. [Appendix B] which was configured as follows: 1. Stainless steel (316) nozzle 2. Glass-lined (Station 1901) or stainless steel-lined (Station 1902) probe 3. Glass fiber filter (11.4 cm diameter) 2 Code of Federal Regulations (Federal Register), Part 40, Title 60. Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, Appendix A, Reference Methods, August 18, 1977. ------- 11 4. First impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml distilled water 5. Second impinger -- Greenburg-Smith with 100 ml distilled water 6. Third impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith, empty 7. Fourth impinger -- modified Greenburg-Smith with approximately 200 g of silica gel Moisture content of the gas stream was determined from the increase in volume in the first three impingers and the weight gain of the silica gel (Method 42). Stack gas molecular weight was based on the average analyses of three gas samples. Gas samples were obtained by the grab sample tech- nique of Method 32. Analyses were performed with Fyrite type combustion gas analyzers. Three sampling runs, all within the isokinetic range of 90% to 110%, were performed on each stack. Prior to each run, the sampling train was leak-checked at 38 cm (15 in) Hg. At the completion of the run, a second leak check was conducted at the highest vacuum recorded during the test. These checks are acceptable if the leakage rate does not exceed 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm). All pitobe assemblies, dry gas and orifice meters used in this test had been calibrated prior to leaving Denver and were recalibrated upon return [Appendix C]. The pitobe assemblies used during the compliance test were those identified as 10-2 and 10-4. An NEIC mobile laboratory, located at the plant, was used for all ------- 12 sampling train preparation and sample recovery. Sample recovery pro- ceeded as follows: 1. All filters were returned to their storage container (petri- dish) and sealed with aluminum foil. 2. The nozzles, probes, cyclones and front portion of the glass filter holder were washed with acetone and the washings from each train were collected in a glass jar with a Teflon*-lined cap. 3. The volumes contained in impingers 1, 2 and 3 were measured as part of the moisture determination. The impingers and connecting glassware were rinsed with distilled, deionized water, and the rinse added to the impinger contents in a glass jar with a Teflon-lined cap. 4. Impinger 4, which contained silica gel, was weighed to determine the moisture gain. The silica gel was discarded. All samples were returned to NEIC Denver and the chemistry laboratories by chain-of-custody procedures [Appendix D]. The samples were analyzed for particulate and sulfate as indicated .below. A full description of the analytical procedures is provided in Appendix E. Sample filter acetone wash impinger Analysis Required (Analytical Procedure) particulate (Method 5), sulfate (Method 82) particulate (Method 5), sulfate (Method 8) inorganic particulate (LAAPCD Source Sampling Manual3), sulfate (Method 8) * Brand name 2 Ibid 3 Air Pollution Source Testing Manual, 1972, LAAPCD, Revised Edition. ------- 13 Filter, acetone and water blank (unused) samples were taken during the survey and analyzed by the procedures described above. The blank residues were subtracted from the sample values before the results were calculated. PROCESS MONITORING The FCC unit was monitored to determine whether conditions were representative of normal operating conditions and to determine the process weight rate. This required reading and recording operating data for the FCC unit, CO boiler and ESP every half hour [Appendix F], The three most important process parameters observed and recorded were: 1) the oil feed rate to the FCC reactor; 2) the catalyst circu- lation rate to the FCC reactor; and 3) the air feed to the FCC regen- erator. The first two parameters were added together to determine the FCC process weight. However, only the first and third process para- meters were read in the FCC control room. The second parameter, catalyst circulation rate, was calculated by the Company and provided to the process observer. The FCC pollution control equipment instrumentation was monitored primarily to determine whether this equipment was operated under steady- state conditions. The process observer recorded the primary current, secondary current, primary voltage and spark rate for the ESP and the flue gas BTU value and air feed rate for the CO boiler. ------- V. TEST RESULTS The Mobil FCC west stack (Station 1901) and east stack (Station 1902) were each sampled three times. Isokinetic sampling rates for the six runs ranged from 97.8% to 107.4%, within the specified range of 90% to 110%. Test data [Appendix G] are summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. During the test period, the FCC unit was operating at a uniform rate of 9,550 (60,000 bbl)/day of oil [Table 6]. The catalyst circulation rate and air feed rate varied little [Appendix F]. Thus, the FCC process weight averaged 3.04 million kg (6.71 million lb)/hr. Company personnel stated that the FCC unit was operating at the normal capacity. The fact that the oil feed rate during the NEIC tests (60,000 bbl/day) was about 9,400 bbl/day greater than the oil feed rate of a previous source test (Truesdail Laboratories-March 28, 1974) lends credence to this opinion. Particulate emission limitations were determined from the measured effluent volumetric flow rates [Tables 1 and 2], the measured process weight rates [Table 6] and the applicable tables in LAAPCD Rules 52 and 54. The west and east FCC stacks have particulate concentration limits of 83 and 88 mg/m^ (0.036 and 0.038 gr/scf) respectively. Total parti- culate emissions from the FCC unit are limited (Rule 54) to 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr. The survey testing program was designed to employ Method 5 proce- dures because they meet all the LAAPCD sampling requirements. During the actual survey, because of equipment malfunctions, probe and oven temperatures could not always be maintained within the temperature range, ------- 15 i.e., 107° to 135°C (225° to 275CF), specified by Method 5. The FCC west stack (Station 1901) probe temperatures averaged within this temp- erature range, but the average oven temperature for one run was as low as 96°C (204°F). During the FCC east stack (Station 1902) testing, probe and oven temperatures averaged between 37° and 81°C (99° and 178°F), and 91° and 121°C (195° and 250°F), respectively. The test results were interpreted using the following particulate definitions: LAAPCD Inorganic particulate less sulfate (as H^SO^ '2 h^O) collected by the filter, acetone wash and impingers 1, 2 and 3. Method 5 Particulate collected at a temperature of 120°C (248°F) by the filter and acetone wash Method 5 (+) Particulate matter as defined by Method 5 plus the nonsulfate (as H2S04 '2 H^O) particulate collected by impingers 1, 2 and 3 The previously mentioned probe and oven temperatures have no effect on the LAAPCD particulate results because any sulfur compounds (sulfates) that condense due to low temperatures (<107°C or 225°F), and thus con- tribute to the total particulate catch, are not included in the emission calculations. The sulfate particulate contribution is subtracted from the total particulate catch and this net result is used to determine the emissions. Based on the LAAPCD calculation procedures, the average FCC con- centration and mass emissions were as follows: ------- 16 Concentration mq/m qr/scf Mass kg/hr lb/hr Station 1901 (west) 37 0.016 5.3 11.7 Station 1902 (east) 83 0.036 10.8 23.7 TOTAL 16.1 35.4 According to Rule 52, the allowable particulate concentrations of Stations 1901 and 1902 are 83 and 88 mg/m^ (0.036 and 0.038 gr/scf), 3 respectively. Station 1901 concentration was 37 mg/m (0.016 gr/scf), 45% of the allowable. Station 1902 concentration was less than the allowed 88 mg/m (0.038 gr/scf) by 6%. The combined mass emissions were 16.1 kg/hr (35.4 lb/hr), 18% more than the 13.6 kg/hr (30 lb/hr) allowed; however, 18% is considered within the accuracy of the test method. It should be noted that one ESP field (E) was shut down during the testing and a second field (D) was operating erratically. The Method 5 and Method 5 (+) results could be affected by the probe and oven temperature variations. Condensed sulfur compounds (sulfates) due to low temperatures (<107°C or 225°F) are included in the particulate catch used in the emission calculations. Therefore, Method 5 and Method 5 (+) emission data were not calculated for the east FCC stack (Station 1902) because the probe and oven temperatures averaged 41° and 4°C (75 and 7°F), respectively, lower than the required temperature of 107°C (225 0 F). Despite some temperature variations, the Method 5 and Method 5 (+) emission data were calculated for the west FCC stack (Station 1901). Probe temperatures averaged within the required temperature range as did the oven temperature of one run. The average oven temperatures for the other two tests (105° and 96°C or 221° and 204°F) were slightly less than required (107°C or 225°F). It was concluded that the emission data would be representative because the temperature variations (2° and 12°C or 4° and 21°F) were small and no visible signs of sample condensation ------- 17 were observed during sample cleanup. Based on the above Method 5 and Method 5 (+) particulate definitions, the average Station 1901 concentration and mass emissions were as follows: Method 5 and Method 5 (+) testing results are 50% and 83%, respectively, greater than the LAAPCD results. The visible emissions from the two stacks were less than the LAAPCD Rule 50 limitation of 20% opacity [Table 7]. Only once did an individual observation reach 15% opacity. Concentration mq/m gr/scf Mass lb/hr Method 5 Method 5 (+) 54 0.024 7.9 69 0.030 9.6 17.4 21.4 The opacity data obtained by NEIC personnel agreed with the Lear- Siegler transmissometer reading in the FCC west stack [Table 8]. ------- 18 Table 1 DATA SUMMARY - FCC WEST STACK, STATION 1901 MOBIL OIL TORRANCE,, CALIFORNIA Volume Sampled (STP)t Ft3 Liters Moisture % Molecular weight (dry) Barometric Pressure cm of Hg in of Hg Stack Gas Temperature °F °C Stack Gas Velocity Ft/sec m/sec Volumetric Flow Rate (STP)t Ft3/min m3/mi n % Isokinetic Particulate collected (mg) Filter Acetone wash Impinger catch (inorganic) Impinger catch (organic) Sulfate Collected as H9S0. '2 H90 (mg) Filter L 4 <- Acetone wash Impinger catch (inorganic) Run Number 1 2 3 30.65 30.12 31.45 868 853 891 12.2 10.8 11.1 30.34 29.96 29.96 76.3 76.2 76.4 30.03 30.01 30.09 515 502 513 268 261 267 48.9 46.5 45.6 14.9 14.2 13.9 89,000 87,200 84,500 2,510 2,460 2,390 98.7 97.8 106.8 16 16 8 28 25 49 241 311 271 0 1 1.5 11 11 1 28* 24 7 241* 285 261 t STP-Standard Temperature (68°F)and pressure (29.92 in of Eg) - Dry * Actual value was greater than particulate catch, therefore, the value of the particulate catch was substituted. ------- 19 Table 2 DATA SUMMARY - FCC EAST STACK, STATION 1902 MOBIL OIL TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Volume Sampled (STP)t Ft3 Li ters Moisture % Molecular weight - dry Barometric Pressure cm of Hg in of Hg Stack Gas Temperature °F °C Stack Gas Velocity Ft/sec m/sec Volumetric Flow Rate (STP)t Ft3/min m3/min % Isokinetic Particulate Collected (mg) Fi1ter Acetone wash Impinger catch (inorganic) Impinger catch (organic) Sulfate Collected as H9SCL '2 H90 (mg Filter c 4 L Acetone wash Impinger catch (inorganic) Run Number 1 2 3 29.22 27.59 30.40 828 781 861 13.6 11.6 9.0 30.54 30.54 30.54 76.3 76.3 76.3 30.04 30.04 30.04 505 520 521 263 271 272 40.9 40.6 42.3 12.5 12.4 12.9 74,000 74,200 79,300 2,090 2,100 2,240 107.4 101.5 104.4 15 18 22 72 67 88 281 431 401 0.5 0 1 4 7 12 0 47 18 267 431* 401* t STP-Standard Temperature (68°F) and pressure (29.92 in of Hg) - Dry * Actual value was greater than particulate catch, therefore3 the value of the particulate catch was substituted. ------- 20 Table 3 PARTICULATE DATA - LAAPCD PROCEDURE* MOBIL OIL COMPANY TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Run Number 1 2 3 Ave Station 1901 (west stack) Particulate Catch (mg) 5 32 58 Concentration gr/scf 0.0025 0.016 0.029 0.016 mg/m3 5.8 38 66 37 Emission Rate lb/hr 1.8 12 21 11.7 kg/hr 0.84 5.4 9.5 5.3 Station 1902 (east stack) Particulate Catch (mg) 97 31 80 Concentration gr/scf 0.051 0.017 0.041 0.036 mg/m3 117 40 93 83 Emission Rate lb/hr 32.5 11 27.5 23.7 kg/hr 14.7 5.0 12.5 10.7 Total Emissions lb/hr 35.4 kg/hr 16.1 Emission Limitations Concentration Station 1901-gr/scf 0.036 mg/m3 83 Station 1902-gr/scf 0.038 mg/m3 88 Emission Rate lb/hr 30.0 kg/hr 13.6 * LAAPCD - Inorganic particulate less sulfates (as ^2^4 ' ^ ^2^ c0^ea^ed by the filter, acetone wash and impingers 1, 2 and 3. ------- 21 Table 4 PARTICULATE DATA - METHOD 5 PROCEDURE* MOBIL OIL COMPANY TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Station 1901 (west stack) Particulate Catch (mg) Concentration gr/scf mg/m3 Emission Rate 1 b/hr kg/hr Station 1902 (east stack) Run Number 1 2 3 Ave 44 41 57 0.022 0.021 0.028 0.024 51 48 64 54 16.2 16 20 17.4 7.4 7.3 9.1 7.9 No Results** Emission Limitations Concentration Station 1901-gr/scf 0.036 mg/m3 83 * Method 5 - Particulate collected at a temperature of 120°C (248°F) by the filter and acetone wash. ** No data reported since testing was not performed according to Method 5 procedures. ------- 22 Table 5 PARTICULATE DATA - METHOD 5 (+) PROCEDURE* MOBIL OIL COMPANY TORRANCE3 CALIFORNIA Station 1901 (west stack) Particulate Catch (mg) Concentration gr/scf mg/m3 Emission Rate lb/hr kg/hr Station 1902 (east stack) Run Number 1 2 3 Ave 44 68 68 0.022 0.035 0.033 0.030 51 80 76 69 16.2 25 23 21.4 7.4 11 10.4 9.6 No Results** Emission Limitations Concentration Station 1901-gr/scf 0.036 mg/m3 83 * Method 5 (+) - Particulate matter as defined by Method 5 plus the nonsulfate (as H^O^ '2 H^O) particulate collected by impingers 1, 2, and 3. ** No data reported since testing was not performed according to Method 5 procedures. ------- 23 Table 6 PROCESS DATA SUMMARY MOBIL OIL TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Catalyst Process Oil Feed Circulation Weight lb/hr kg/hr lb/hr kg/hr lb/hr Date (mi 11 ions) (mi 11 ions) (mi 11i ons} 9/15 0.34 0.75 2.95 6.50 3.28 7.25 9/16 0.34 0.76 2.77 6.11 3.11 6.86 9.17 0.34 0.76 2.51 5.53 2.85 6.29 9/18 0.34 0.76 2.58 5.68 2.92 6.44 Average 3.04 6.71 ------- Table 7 VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION DATA SUMMARY MOBIL OIL TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Range of :e_ Station No. Run No. Emission Opacity 6 1901 2 5* 7 1901 3 5-10 1901 3 5* 1902 1 5-15 9/18 1902 2 5-10 1902 3 5* No range ------- 25 Table 8 CONTINUOUS MONITORING DATA3 FCC WEST STACK (1901) MOBIL OIL TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Concentration Date Hour Opacity^ S0o (ppm) NO. (ppm) t- X 9/15 1115 8 200 200 9/16 1100 10 200 80 1630 15 200 80 9/17 0930 9 200 100 1410 9 220 70 ------- APPENDIX A PRESURVEY INSPECTION REPORT ------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY A~1 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER BUILDING 53, BOX 25227, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER DENVER, COLORADO 80225 ro Chief, Field Operations Branch date August 11, 1977 pp. 3m Paul R. dePercin - bject Presurvey Inspection of the Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance Refinery, Torrance, California On July 12, 1977, John Powell and Lynn Brown, Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District (LA APCD) and the writer inspected the Torrance Refinery of Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance, California, to obtain information necessary to conduct a source test of the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) stack. Information gathered included the FCC process description, air .pollution control equipment configuration, source testing feasibility, and process and control equipment operating data availability. Of particular interest were the available sampling locations and what modifications to these locations were needed to conduct EPA source testing. The plant representatives contacted were Messrs. Carl Mehl, Environmental Control Manager, and Ronald Wilkniss, Environmental Surveillance Supervisor. EPA Region IX requested NEIC, Denver to source test the FCC stack emissions to determine their compliance status. A source test, conducted on May 30, 1974, by Truesdail Lab Inc., determined the FCC particulate emissions to be 8.3 kg (18.4 lb)/hr, well in compliance with the emission limitation (LA APCD Rule 54) of 13.6 kg (30 lb)/hr. However, the source test emission rate calculations excluded the ammonium sulfate particulate contribution, a non-standard calculation procedure. Because the source test calculation procedures are questionable, the FCC unit compliance status is unknown. PROCESS DESCRIPTION The Mobil Oil Corporation operates an integrated petroleum refinery at Torrance, California, with a rated capacity of 130,000 bbl of crude oil per day. Major processes used at this refinery include crude desalting, atmospheric distillation, vacuum distillation, delayed coking, catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, catalytic reforming, hydrotreating, alkylation, hydrogeneration, hydrogen production, and sulfur recovery. Because NEIC was requested to source test the catalytic cracking process emissions, the catalytic cracking process is more fully described below. ------- A-2 fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit1 Spent catalyst from the FCC unit is continuously removed from the reactor portion and introduced through piping into the catalyst regeneration 3H)_rtton,Here the petroleum coke, tars, and other residual deposits which form on "the catalyst surface are burned off the catalyst fines. The recovered catalyst is then recycled to the reactor. Catalyst particles which are s^tra-ined in the exhaust gases are partially captured by a series of cyclone ¦^elwtra-tors internal to the regenerator unit. Particles captured by these cyclones are returned to the regenerator. FAIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT1 ^The"regenerator unit exhaust gases contain carbon monoxide, particulate setter,"aldehydes, sulfur oxides, ammonia, and oxides of nitrogen. In order Itd:minimize the carbon monoxide (CO) emissions and to recover the fuel value cdf.fh'is".material, the regenerator exhaust gases are combusted in a waste ¦jheatlboiler. .The CO boiler exhaust gases are then passed through a Buell -electrostatic precipitator (ESP) consisting of two parallel banks with five stages"per bank [Figure 1]. This Buell ESP unit requires ammonia injection, i.e.T_ammonia gas is injected into the inlet gas stream to the ESP to improve ¦the^ionization of the gas. .SOURCE SAMPLING FEASIBILITY LSamp1e~ Locations eJhe.two parallel ESP banks (east and west) each have a 2.7 m (9 ft) ajneier. stack [Figure 2]. These two stacks have identical geometries, sampling platforms and ports, and accesses. The sampling ports are 6.4 m ^2]Ift'or 2.3 diameters) downstream from and 1.8 m (6 ft or 0.7 diameters) upstream of any flow disturbance. There are four 10 cm (4 in) ports (north, south, east and west) located at 90° intervals around the stack. Lugs ^padeyes^ are located 1.8 m (6 ft) above the east and west ports. The s^fpT-fng-p-latform is located 0.9 m (3 ft) below these ports. 1.2 m (4 ft) out-from the stack and 0.9 m (3 ft) above the sampling platform is the 7cP-':ac*^or.m rai^n9> directly in front of the sample ports. Two possible problere exist when testing the west ESP stack. The EDC* p.SO^/WO' analyzer has a 20 cm (8 in) diameter probe in the stack, which has a h;£..cni.(2 in) wide slit** for 1.8 m (6 ft) of the probe length (2.7 m or 9 ft). s'oO^'^ -1S ^ downstream from the ports and 10 to 15° to the process is r.c*-T - 1 State Implementation Plan Air Pollution Inspection of Mobil Oil Company, Los Angeles County, California, EPA 330/2-76-011, February 1976, page 8. * Brand name - Environmental Data Corporation ** Slit parallel to gas flow. ------- CO I «=t luid .Catalytic -acking Unit Combustion Gases Catalyst rator Foster-Wheeler Carbon monoxide Boiler li Mobil Oil Corporation, Torrance, Calif. FCC Unit Diagram and A1r Pollution Controls ^Stacks "n. Sample Platforms A Buell Electrostatic Precipitator note: Capital letters of ESP indicate Individua] sections with separate controls ------- <53* I < Lugs 6 ft' )Ove EfiW ^orts ^2! N0X Analyzer, 4-10 cm ports 4?.7 m. (9 n) :==~ A 0.8 m I?.5 ft). f 8.2 m (27 ft) I- West Stack 3.3 m < > 1.8 m (6 ft) / "C 0.9 m JL 3 ft) 6.4 m (21 ft) 2.7 m (9 ft) -/ ^Lugs 6 ft Above E&M Ports 4-10 cm ports Sampling platform Note: Both stacks have identical geometri (11 ft) East Stack ------- Railing Platform A-5 Top View Port -S Centerlirie Stack Port Platform 1 1.5 FT Tr Railing Side View Figure Horizontal and Vertical clearances requried by sacpling train. ------- A-6 right of the south port, close enough to the ports to possibly cause flow interferences. Velocity measurements, in the source test previously mentioned, have not found any flow disturbances and, therefore, particulate sampling can be performed at this location. The second problem is the thermocouple probe in the east port of the FCC west stack. Some interference from the probe is expected if the probe extends more than 3 cm (1.2 in) into the stack. In this case, a proper traverse from the west port probably is not possible, and it will be necessary to have the thermocouple removed. Modifications Modifications to the sampling facilities are necessary before particulate sampling can be performed. The sampling platform railing is directly in front of the south and v/est sampling ports and thus sections of this railing must be cut away as shown in Figure 3. Also, padeyes must be attached to each stack 1.8 m (6 ft) over the south ports in order to use the monorail system. As mentioned previously, if the thermocouple in the FCC west stack, east port interferes with the sampling traverse, the thermocouple must be removed. Miscellaneous The NEIC air sailing van can be driven to the base of the stacks where electric power is available. Each stack has a pulley system for hauling equipment to the sample platform, but cable or rope is needed. Radios can be used in the plant, however, the company wishes to be informed of the radio frequency used. PROCESS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT OBSERVATIONS In the FCC unit control room, instruments indicate the FCC unit and CO boiler operating conditions. All instruments will be observed during each source test run to determine whether steady-state operations exist, and to obtain the process data necessary for calculating of FCC process weight. The FCC process weight is defined as the sum of the oil feed rate and the catalyst circulation rate to the reactor portion of the FCC unit.* Since the oil feed rate (bbls/day) and catalyst circulation rate (tons/min) are directly recorded in the FCC control room, the FCC process weight can easily be determined. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The two FCC ESP stacks can be particulate sampled by Method 5. The sampling locations are acceptable, but require modification before sampling can be conducted. The company should perform the following modifications: ~Telephone conversation with James Nance, LA APCD on July 15, 1977. ------- A-7 a. For both FCC ESP stacks remove the platform railings in front of the south and west ports to provide the clearance necessary for testing according to EPA Method 5. The attached Figure 3 gives the necessary vertical and horizontal clearances from the port centerline. b. For both FCC ESP stacks install lugs (padeyes), like those over the east and west ports, 1.8 m (6 ft) over the south ports. Furthermore, the company should provide the following: a. A parking space for the NEIC air sampling van (8 ft x 40 ft) near the base of the ESP stacks. b. Electric power for this van, either a standard range plug or two 110 volt, 20 amp lines. c. Electric power for the sample train control modules; 110 volt, 20 amp each, on top of the FCC ESP. Process operations will be monitored in the FCC unit control room to ensure steady-state operating conditions exist. Access to the control room will be required by the process observer. The company should provide the following process data for each sampling period: a. Oil feed rate to the FCC reactor (bbls/day) b. Catalyst circulation rate to the FCC reactor (tons/min). ------- APPENDIX B SAMPLE TRAIN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ------- B-1 STACK SAMPLING EQUIPMENT The Scientific Glass Model AP-5000 modular STAC-O-LATUR1™ sampling train consists of a control unit, a sampling unit and a vacuum unit. The units are connected together with quick disconnect electrical and air lines and umbilical cords. The AP-5000 control unit contains the following: 1. Dual-inclined manometer (range 0-5" H?0) for indicating the pitot tube velocity pressure and the orifice pressure drop. 2. Temperature control for the oven and probe. 3. A flow valve and a bypass valve for adjusting sampling rates. 4. Digital Temperature Indicator (DTI) which gives an instant readout from six (6) points; stack, probe, oven, impinger outlet, meter inlet, meter outlet by the use of a selector switch. 5. Umbilical cords of (50 and 100 ft lengths) which interconnect the control and sampling units. 6. Communications sets are wired through control unit, umbilical cord to the sampling unit.* The sampling unit is made up of three distinct sections: impinger case, oven, and probe. All three sections can be converted to form one sampling unit or can be separated for unusual sampling conditions. Below are the individual component descriptions. 1. Probe Sheath - Made of 316 stainless steel. The nozzle end is packed with asbestos string. The ball joint (sampling unit) end has a woven teflon 0 Ring as packing material. 2. Probe liner - 5/8" O.D. medium wall glass (pyrex) or stainless steel (316) tubing logarithmically wrapped with nicrome heating element, having a resistance of 2 ohms/ft. The liner is insulated with fiberglass and asbestos with a type K thermocouple imbedded for sensing the probe temperature. 3. Filter Frit - Porous glass frit (coarse) banded to silicone rubber. * Separate communication system used during this test program. ------- B-2 4. Oven - Fiberglass insulated capable of maintaining 120°C (248°F) in cold weather (0°C). The vacuum unit (pump) is capable of drawing a high vacuum (50 cm Hg) and a moderate volume (14 1pm) of air. The pump is rotary fiber vane type which does not require lubrication, but oil bath filters are used for pump protection. ------- APPENDIX C CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND DATA ------- C-l DISCUSSION OF CALIBRATIONS As discussed in the test report the pitobe assembly and the dry gas meter were calibrated before and after the source test survey. Each piece of equipment met the accuracy criteria contained in the procedures in this appendix prior to the source test survey. Post-survey calibrations are conducted and compared with pre-survey calibrations. One dry gas meter accuracy coefficient changed from 1.02 to 0.98 while the other changed from 0.98 to 0.96. However, neither coefficient changed more than 5% as allowed in Section 5.3 of Method 5 (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A). The calibration coefficients of pitobe 10-2 (east stack) and 10-4 (west stack) changed from 0.76 to 0.80 (+5.3%) and 0.83 to 0.80 (-3.6%), respectively. However, Method 2 (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A) makes no mention of using the post-survey pitobe calibration coefficients, inferring initial coefficients should be used in all calculations, i.e. for isokinetic and emission rate determinations. Using the pre-survey pitobe coefficients the isokinetic rates range from 97.8 to 107.4%. With the post-survey pitobe coefficients the isokineter rates would range from 96.4 to 110.6%. If the post-survey coefficients for both the dry gas meters and pitobe assemblies were used to recalculate the mass emission rate from both stacks, the effect would be to reduce the report result (36 lb/hr) by 1%. ------- C-2 UEIC PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION OF DRY GAS METER AND ORFICE METER Dry gas meters are used in source testing units to accurately measure sample volumes drawn during testing. A critical orfice is also installed to provide a known sampling rate so that isokinetic sampling can be maintained. These units will be calibrated before and after each sampling trip. Calibration is accomplished by making simultaneous total volume measurements with a calibrated wet test meter and the dry gas meter. The wet test meter roust be previously calibrated from a primary standard. Calibration is performed follows: 1. Level wet test meter and adjust the water level to the proper point. 2. Level and zero the manometer on sampling control unit. 3. Leak check unit and air hoses at 15 inch Hg (leakage rate must be zero). Assemble vacuum line to the wet test meter. (Caution: NO NOT Leak Check System by Plugging the Inlet to the Wet Test Meter, this will cause internal damage to the meter.) A. Warm up control unit by operating vacuum pump for 30 minutes with wet test meter connected in series. 5. Close the course valve and open the fine adjust (by-pass) valve. 6. Turn or vacuum pump, open course adjust valve and turn the fine adjust valve until manometer reads 0.5" l^O (All). ------- C-3 7. Simultaneously record the dry gas meter reading, wet test meter reading and time. Record temperature of wet test meter, inlet and outlet temperature of dry gas meter and atmospheric pressure during the test run. 8. Allow pump to run until the wet test meter indicates exactly 5 cubic feet of air have passed through the system (10 cubic feet when a AH of 2, 3 and A inches H^O are used) and record time. 9. Repeat steps 5-9 for AH of 1", 2" 3" and 4" H^O. 10. Calibration record will be kept in a permanent file at NEIC. Copies will be made for field use. Calculations Calculate the accuracy of the dry gas meter (y) as follows: Vw Pb (td + 460) y ~ Vd (Pb + AH (tw + 460) 13.6) Where: V = Volume of gas metered, wet test meter, ft. w 3 = Volume of gas metered, dry gas meter, ft. P, ¦= Atmospheric pressure, inches Hg b t^ = Dry gas meter temperature, °F (t^ in — t^ out) 2 = Wet test meter temperature, °F If Y ^ 1.00 (+0.02) then gas meter will be taken to Public Service Company of Colorado gas meter shop for adjustment and/or repair. Orfice meter coefficient (AH@ = 0.317 AH P (td+460) b (tw+460) 9 Vw ------- C-4 Where: = Volume of gas metered, wet test meter, ft = Atmospheric pressure = Dry gas meter temperature, °F tw = Wet test meter temperature, °F 0 = Time elapsed, minutes ------- C-5 Orifice Meter Calibration Date Box No. 5&.r / JM-'-O. Barometric pressure, P^= in. Hg Dry gas meter No. f_ hcAj---- L Orifice Manometer setting, AH in. HoO Gas volume wet test meter v ft3 Gas volume dry gas meter v ft3 Temoerature • Wet Test Meter V Dry gas meter Inlet di' °F Outlet ""do' °F Average td> °F Time 0, min AHg 0.5 o 13 mi X 1.0 So 73 0^ £1 W \° tb ,-V- i titi 2.0 10 10 O 73 ?o P 7 C 11(3 fy & 3.0 10 ID Of 13 CtsA /—¦ ca 7 it, ¦& c 4.0 10 IQ.Ol ~7L1 G-. i / O; lol /?//, Average Calculations AH 0.5 AH 13.6 0.0368 Vw.Pb (td + ?60) Vh Tpfi7HTTC> 460) - , 13-6 , N ^{Q4u1-\- Y~/? r-M I/. 0; AH? 0.0317AH Ph (tH+ 460) f(t., + 460) G 1— Vy / — P-C> ?P>ox l?73//AW VSE^KrOL 3" -I 1.0 0.0737 5 ^f C S ,-r / r o'^i -i «-H -C-"i O or> i"? X/¦ P 7 ,-a 2M tr7 ( £7 'J 2.0 0.147 12_ <->/_ o > / L fO-O /i-f j_ |u -» o t \ r f T?<-i u't.r.S\ n / ------- C-6 Orifice Meter Calibration Date Box flo. - % p^f 6 "3 Barometric pressure, Pfa= in. Hg Dry gas meter No. lc-=\K-CKec-k.@tZ"/f\ -- o.o d-^rn Ori fi ce Manometer setting, AH in. Ho0 Gas volume wet test meter V ft3 Gas volume dry gas meter v n3 Temperature Time 0, min y AH@ Wet Test Dry gas meter Meter Inlet Outlet Average °F ldi' °F tdo' °F td» °F 0.5 5 79- 7V 73 p/T t/.OS .ft A 73 1.0 5 £0*7 73 7(= 13 n ------- C-7 Date Orifice Meter Calibration ?! ll Box flo._ 5GT- / — I » „ - ^ Barometric pressure, P|3= in. Hg Dry gas meter No. /-1c ~ , CL i ------- C-8 Orifice Meter Calibration Date Box No. Barometric pressure, Pb= in. Hg Dry gas meter No. P i. l-V (. 'r • I l £rf\\Lc\ fD, r Ori fi ce Manometer setting, AH in. HqO Gas volume wet test meter V, w: ft* Gas volume dry gas meter ft* Temperature Wet Test Meter V Dry gas meter Inlet tdi' Outlet °F Average td» °F Time 0, min Y AH@ 0.5 .^7/7 & ?£T 73 7 V //. 11 ft ) ?o 1.0 3M ?0 lb 73 7-! ti'-b-V CVVlYQp-r <-fl-oS~ 0.147 | <-h r ^ \m :•/:>' i>r?V^c i '-'l 1% ah@ i$L3 0.0317AH Ph (tri+ 460) (t,„ + 460)9 O '> \~~7 * . JT F&c -*-*/< d>>!! d.7 i (~ 9^?r7q o -? i~i v |