r
MAY 1976
VOL. TWO. NO. FIVE
                                   CHESAPEAKE BAY
                         U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
The  Chesapeake,
  Environmental  problems involving the Nation's
largest  estuary, the Chesapeake  Bay, and the coun-
try's biggest river, the Mississippi, are discussed in
this issue of EPA Journal.
  The  special pride that  many Easterners feel in the
Chesapeake is reflected  in  the  following paragraph
from a new book, "Beautiful Swimmers."  by Wil-
liam W.  Warner:
  "The Bay. There  is no  possible confusion with
any other  body of water, no need for more  precise
description.  It is, after  all, the continent's  largest
one of the articles in this issue.
  Far to the  South, EPA  is seeking answers which
may help decide  the fate of the Atchafalaya Basin, a
spectacular wilderness swamp in central Louisiana.
The Basin serves as a  safety spillway that in high-
water times siphons off much of the peak flow of the
Mississippi River which might otherwise flood Baton
Rouge and New  Orleans.
  The Corps of Engineers has been considering the
possibility of making the Atchafalaya  River deeper
and wider so that it can carry out flood waters at a
estuary.  Its waters are rich,  the  main supply of
oysters, crabs, clams and other  seafoods for much of
the Atlantic seaboard.  Its shorelines cradled our first
settlements. It is the Chesapeake."
   The title of this fascinating book comes  from the
scientific name of the Atlantic Blue Crab, Callinectes
sapidus.  (Callinectes,  Greek for  "beautiful  swim-
mers," sapidus, Latin for "tasty.")
   The book is an engrossing account  of the life of
the blue crab, the watermen who catch  them and the
Bay which nourishes them  in such abundance. Mr.
Warner reports that anywhere  from  150 million to
240  million blue crabs are removed from  the Bay
each year, a multi-million dollar  crop.
   Increasing concern about the  future of Chesapeake
Bay has prompted a major  study by EPA to develop
a  management system to  protect the Bay's  water
quality. The launching of this study is the subject of
much faster rate.  Conservationists fear that  this
dredging  could  drain the river  swamplands  which
now  support an extraordinary abundance of wildlife.
  EPA  is  working with the Corps, the State of
Louisiana, and other Federal agencies to prepare a
comprehensive  plan for management of water  re-
sources in the  Atchafalaya Basin which will accom-
modate flood control and yet preserve  the swamp
areas necessary for wildlife.
  Other subjects covered in this issue are:
  EPA's new  regulations to curb boat  wastes;  the
Agency's role with  the news  media; a review  of the
latest CEQ annual report; an article on the coming of
the  metric system;  the latest in  a series of regional
reports,  this one from  Region V in Chicago;  and a
review of the Agency's new movie on the construc-
tion grants program.  u

-------
          U.S.
          ENVIRONMENTAL
          PROTECTION
          AGENCY

          Russell E. Train
          Administrator

          Patricia L. Cahn
          Director of Public Affairs

           Charles D. Pierce
           Editor

           Staff:
           Van Trumbull
           Ruth Husscy
          PHOTO CREDITS

COVER   Maryland Division of Tourist
          Development

PAGE 2   Mike Lien*
          James E. Pickerell*
          Ted Hopkins. Photographers

PAGE 3   M. E. Warren

PAGE 6   I .ouisiana Wildlife and
          Fisheries Commission

PAGE  6. 7 j. H.  Britt

PAGE 9   Institute of Environmental
          Education

PAGE 19. 20 John H. White*
          Paul Sequeira*

          * DOCUMKR1CA Photo
COVER : This view of one of the famed
Chesapeake Bay skipjacks  was taken
from  another sailing vessel at last year's
annual  Chesapeake Appreciation Day.
The one-masted  skipjacks, built for the
dredging of oysters, comprise  the only
commercial  sailing fleet left in the United
States, according to Maryland officials.
INSIDE COVER
Drawings hy  Consueio  Hanks from
BEAUTIFUL SWIMMERS: Watermen.
Crabs and tin- Chi'sapetike Bay By Wil-
liam W.  Warner.  Copyright fc) 1976 by
William  W. Warner. Reprinted hy permis-
sion of  Little.  Brown  and C'ompany in
association with  the Atlantic  Monthly
Press.
ARTICLES
 PROTECTING THE  CHESAPEAKE
 EPA is developing a management plan
 to help curb pollution in Chesapeake Bay.
SENTINEL ON THE BAY  by Truman Temple                      4
A report on Region Ill's field office in Annapolis. Md.

CHALLENGE OF A LOUISIANA SWAMP                        5
Serving as the Mississippi's safety valve
may spoil the beautiful Atchafalaya Basin.

CURB ON BOATING WASTES  by Peter Acly                      8

YOUTHFUL  WATER SAMPLERS                                 9
THE METRIC SYSTEM IS COMING                              10

EPA  AND THE NEWS MEDIA  by Patricia L. Cahn               12

CEQ REPORTS                                                   14
 REGION V ON PARADE
HUNTING THE GREAT  MIDWESTERN MYTH
by Frank Corrado

WITHIN OUR REACH
                               18
                               20


                    BACK PAGE
DEPARTMENTS
 PEOPLE
                               16
AROUND THE NATION
                               22
INQUIRY
NEWS BRIEFS
 The  EPA  Journal   is  published
 monthly, with combined  issues for
 July-August and November-Decem-
 ber, for employees of the U.S. Envi-
 ronmental  Protection Agency. It does
 not alter or supersede regulations.
 operating  procedures or manual in-
 structions. Contributions and inquiries
should be addressed to the Editor, (A-
107) Room 301,  West Tower,  Water-
side Mall. 401 M St., S.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. 20460. No permission nec-
essary to reproduce contents  except
copyrighted photos and other  mate-
rials.
Printed on recycled paper.

-------
PROTECTING THE CHESAPEAKE
 Flying  through a dawn mist over
Chesapeake Bay. the osprey suddenly
folded its huge  wings,  hurtled down-
ward and sank completely out of sight
as it plunged,  talons first, into the Bay
in a shower of water.
 Emerging a few seconds later with a
wriggling three-foot eel,  the osprey,
often called the  fish hawk, shook  the
water from its wings and  rested for a
moment on  the  surface. Then it
flapped off with  its prey clutched in its
lalons towards its  large nest of sticks
on a  nearby channel light marker.
 The osprey nestlings began their
clamor for food  as soon as they heard
the  squealing whistle  of  the arriving
parent.
 So  began  another day in the life of
the osprey,  one  of the billions  of
organisms  dependent  upon Chesa-
peake Bay. the  Nation's  largest estu-
ary, for their livelihood.
 The osprey. which has been making
a comeback  on the  Bay since  the
banning  of DDT,  is a  symbol of the
extraordinary  wealth of fish, shellfish
and  wildfowl that feed,  breed and
thrive in the Bay waters.
Osprey guards its nest on a channel light
marker.
 However, the future of the Bay is
threatened by its most intensive user,
man. Millions of people visit the Bay
every year for its fishing and boating
and hundreds of towns and industries
depend on its waters.
 It is this mounting use  and abuse
which led the  Senate  Appropriations
Racing on Chesapeake Ba\.
Committee to direct  EPA to conduct
an in-depth study of Chesapeake Bay
after it found that "this estuary is a
critically important natural  and eco-
nomic  resource,  but  is subject to
many pressures which, if uncontrolled,
will lead  to the degradation of the
whole Bay area."
 This  study, which is beginning now,
will be under the over-all supervision
of Daniel J. Snyder. 111. Region III
Administrator and National  Program
Manager  for the  Chesapeake  Bay.
Director of the Chesapeake Bay study
program is Len Mangiaracina.
 "The primary goal of the  program
will be Jo develop a  management
system which is designed to  maintain
and improve the over-all water quality
of Chesapeake  Bay."  Administrator
Russell E. Train explained.
 Mr.  Train said that the Bay "is an
incomparable  recreation resource for
one of the most crowded population
areas  of the  country.  Most impor-
tantly, it serves as a source  of liveli-
hood  for  many of the  eight million
people who live in the Bay area.
 "Their way of life, their culture and
values, as well as the  livelihood that
the Bay provides, are increasingly
threatened by the pressures for indus-
trial  development, from population
growth, from housing  developments
and other  construction, from man-
induced changes in salinity, and from
the flood of substances ranging from
silt to pesticides and other  chemical
compounds that continue to pour into
the Bay."
 On a personal note, Mr. Train  said
that "for many years, my wife and I
sailed the length and breadth of the
Chesapeake  Bay on weekends  and
whenever else we had the chance.
anchoring at night among the innumer-
able creeks and coves that make the
Bay one of the  world's great sailing
grounds.
 "It was then that we began a  love
affair with the Bay that ted almost 10
years ago to the  purchase of a water-
front farm  in  Talbot  County  on the
Eastern  Shore. There I spend every
free moment I can!"
 The  over-all study  of the  Bay  by
EPA, which  may take several years.
will use a two-pronged approach:
 1. Strengthening planning and regula-
tory actions to deal with the  special
problems of Chesapeake Bay. Consid-
eration will  be  given to  increasing
priority for construction grants to  mu-
nicipalities within the Chesapeake  Bay
drainage area,  reviewing permits given
to  industries and cities for discharge of
wastes  to the  Bay and tightening  per-
mit restrictions when necessary, coor-
dinating activities of  area-wide plan-
   ..       - -**'*• -"*-•-*
   • ^^M^Si^^^&^-M


^^SSra^frjK
•^feSJss^
   : »>-A ***>    ,V
Dead tish washed ashore at Sands Point
Stale Park, near Annapolis. Md.


ning agencies  and encouraging local
planning agencies to seek appropriate
legislation to curb pollution from such
non-point sources as farms.
 2.  Establishing and  strengthening
knowledge of existing and potential
water quality problems which could be
subject  to regulations. The Region III
PAGE 2

-------
Maryland fisherman hangs up his nets.
Office is  reviewing  existing  informa-
tion about the Bay. evaluating present
State and Federal  monitoring pro-
grams with the objective of correcting
any weaknesses and seeking to iden-
tify areas  where  further  study and
research are needed.
  Mr. Snyder  said  that  the study will
emphasize the coordination of existing
programs being conducted by agencies
now operating in the Bay area, includ-
ing the  Maryland. Pennsylvania. Vir-
ginia. Delaware and  West  Virginia
state agencies, the  eight local planning
agencies  now operating  under the
Federal Water Pollution C'ontrol Act.
the Army Corps of Engineers, and the
National Oceanographic and  Atmos-
pheric Administration.
  The Army  Corps of  Hngineers  is
completing a huge hydraulic model of
the Bay.  This approximately $10-mil-
lion. nine-acre model is  located in a
14-acre  building  on the Eastern shore
near the Bay Bridge. It will be used to
study tidal action and many Bay water
functions and problems.
 Hundreds of studies of the Bay have
been made by the Corps of Hngineers,
the State of Maryland, and many
other public  and  private agencies over
the years. Approximately 50 public
and private institutions have a profes-
sional interest of one sort  or  another
in  the Chesapeake Bay estuarine sys-
tem.
 In an effort to  take advantage of this
wealth  of existing knowledge about
the Bay,  EPA  plans  to establish a
Policy Advisory Committee, a  Citi-
zens  Advisory  Committee and a
Technical Advisory Committee.
 Scientists,  planners and resource
managers will be  invited to a work-
shop conference on the Bay that EPA
plans  to sponsor late this summer or
in  the fall.
 The major emphasis  in  the  early
phases of the study will  be coordina-
tion of the efforts of the  agencies and
jurisdictions which have  an  interest in
the Bay. collecting and analyzing tech-
nical data and developing an effective
monitoring system.  Research will also
be a significant part of the study.
 A total of 10  positions  and $500,000
has been made available to Region III
to begin the study.
 Some  of the  critical  problems  now
threatening the  Bay's water quality
are: toxic  organic  materials such as
pesticides  and industrial chemicals:
nutrients such as  nitrogen and  phos-
phorus from  municipal and industrial
wastes,  which  stimulate excessive
growth  of  aquatic plants; disposal of
contaminated dredge spoils: and heavy
loads  of sediments  from  eroded land.
 The  Administrator recently wrote to
the Governors  of Maryland, Virginia
and Delaware reporting  on  the  prob-
lem of  contamination  by  the  toxic
pesticide, Kepone.  The letters  advise
the Governors  of the  maximum  safe
residue  levels of  Kepone for oysters.
crabs and finfish,  recommended by
EPA to the Food and  Drug Adminis-
tration.
 The  discharge of nitrogen  and  phos-
phorus in human and other wastes has
contributed to heavy blooms of algae
plants  in  the  upper   Bay, which
threaten to upset  the Bay's  ecological
balance.
 Another cause of concern in the Bay
is the  gradual loss of rooted  grasses in
the tributary  streams.  These  grasses
play an  important  role  in  providing
food for  waterfowl and shelter  for
many  water creatures.
 Other water quality problems in  the
Bay are: bacteriological degradation, a
diminishing level of dissolved oxygen
in  the water,  fish  kills,  oil spills.
thermal  and  industrial  pollution,  and
increased deposits of sediment.
 The Bay is immense—195 miles long.
four to  30 miles wide,  and with an
average  depth of 28 feet. But using it
in  an  irresponsible manner,  as a  sink
for a wide variety of industrial and
domestic wastes, could  shorten  the
useful biological and recreational life-
time of this world-famous Bay. n
                                                                                                         PACK 3

-------
     Sentinel   on   the   Bay
 When Captain John Smith sailed up
the Chesapeake in 1606 he called it "a
very goodly Bay,  18  or 20 myles
broad" and added:
 "In sommer no place  affordth  more
plentie of  Sturgeon,  nor in winter
more abundance of fowle, especially
in  time of  frost.  I  tooke once 52
Sturgeons at a draught, at another
68."
 If Captain  Smith  should sail up the
Bay today, he would  still  find it
goodly,  but  he might also encounter
some  EPA  research vessels  making
sure it stays that way. For the Bay is
threatened  with environmental prob-
lems, and  one of the functions of
EPA's Annapolis  Field Office  is to
monitor them  and  keep the Agency
and the  public alerted to the hazards.
 Like many of EPA's operations, the
Field  Office  came from  another
agency.  It started life in 1965 as  part
of the water pollution control program
in  the Department  of Health, Educa-
tion and Welfare and was later moved
to  the Interior Department.  It was an
arm  of  the  Federal Water Quality
Administration when that Agency be-
came pan of EPA in 1970.
 Through the years, the Field Office's
mission  also has changed.  Not  only
must the staff  patrol the Bay's  195-
mile length  but also devote  a  very
large  proportion of work to other
environmental  problems of  Region
III.  During a  recent interview,  for
example, Orterio Villa, director of the
facility, was interrupted by  several
phone calls. One disclosed  that  the
highly  toxic pesticide Kepone  had
been  found in crabs in the James
River.  Another dealt with Philadel-
phia's drinking water supply. And the
Field Office's  activities also range
from air sample monitoring in Wash-
ington, D.C. to arsenic in the soil at
Alexandria, Virginia, and  measure-
ments to determine pollutants in  the
effluents from steel  mills around  Pitts-
burgh.
 Although  "crisis"  sampling  has
preoccupied the staff in recent  months
as  one after another hazardous pollu-
tant has cropped up in  the environ-
ment, much of their activities deal
with routine  enforcement of water and
air laws, including the National Pollu-
tant Discharge Elimination System of
permits.
PAGE 4
                                          By Truman Temple*
 To serve the Region, the  Field Of-
fice operates with a staff of 30 in the
cramped quarters of a rented building
(and three trailers) at the western edge
of Annapolis.
 The workload has grown  so heavy
that  a new  laboratory building near
the existing  site is  now planned for
completion next year that will increase
space from  7,500 square feet to more
than 30,000.  The facility also will be
redesignated  as a consolidated regional
laboratory from its present status.
 The enlarged quarters will come
none  too soon.  The  staff not only
must provide technical expertise to the
Region, including sampling of drinking
water, monitoring river basins, and air
and NPDES enforcement, but it must
also  make numerous  ocean cruises to
inspect dumping sites on the continen-
tal shelf.  In  addition, the Field Office
provides  three  Districts and  seven
area offices  of the  Coast Guard with
analyses in oil spill cases.
 "We use four or five different  meth-
ods  to analyze the  oil,"  Mr.  Villa
explains.  "If necessary,  we can even
tell  whether the  oil came from  a
Venezuelan or Arabian oil field by the
vanadium and nickel in it."
 The Field  Office maintains a  small
fleet  to carry out its tasks.  At the
moment it has  a  33-foot Bertram, a
27-foot Concord, a  23-foot  Thunder-
bird  it acquired from  EPA's  Cincin-
nati  Lab, plus a couple of  Boston
Whalers for quick runs into shallow
coves. Four of the staff members are
qualified scuba divers.  On the oceano-
graphic cruises aboard large  Coast
Guard cutters—13  trips so far to the
dumping  grounds off Delaware and
Maryland—the staff has taken samples
from 200 feet down. (DuPont and the
City of Philadelphia, which now use
the ocean dumping sites, are sched-
uled to phase out their operations in
the next few years.)
 Who are the most and least coopera-
tive  industries in the Field  Office's
experience?  Oddly enough, the an-
swer does not seem to correspond to
the industry's resources. One of the
best  that he has encountered  in the
Region, Mr. Villa declares,  is a pork
processing plant in  Virginia! The firm,
Cornwell Brothers,  not  only  has pi-
oneered in controlling pollutants from
its meat  handling operations but has
been praised  by  former EPA  General
Counsel  Alan G. Kirk for its efforts.
And at the other end of the spectrum,
some nationally known companies
have used extensive  stalling tactics
and legal maneuvers to avoid  compli-
ance with the law, according to Mr.
Villa. On a couple of occasions. EPA
inspectors were even denied entrance
to the plants and had to  get  their
enforcement  lawyers  on the phone
before they could get  inside  the gates.
  Mr. Villa, who  majored  in chemistry
at Dickenson College, Carlisle,  Pa.,
and did  graduate work at the  Univer-
sity of California at  Berkeley and  at
George   Washington   University.
Washington,  D.C., has maintained an
interest in the sea for a long time. He
served  as a Naval officer aboard the
cruiser  U.S.S. Columbus  for three
years including a  tour in the Far East,
and later worked  in a  Naval research
laboratory in  California. He joined the
Annapolis  Field  Office in  1966, and
has been director since 1973.  In his
current post he has  helped  in formu-
lating EPA  regional  guidelines for
management  of  dredge spoil, in de-
signing  the new  laboratory,  and  in
planning  for  the   new  EPA study  of
the Chesapeake Bay.
  If a visitor took a superficial look  at
the daily work of the Annapolis staff,
he would assume that only a small
amount  of its time—perhaps 5 per-
cent—is spent patrolling and monitor-
ing the  Chesapeake.  But Mr.  Villa
points out that this is deceptive. When
one adds in the related monitoring  of
the many tributaries emptying into the
estuary, and the  NPDES permit pro-
gram for industries along those rivers,
much of the facility's work is involved
with the ultimate impact  of man's
activities on the  ecology  of the Bay.
"By  this yardstick, close to  half of all
our work affects the Chesapeake,"
Mr. Villa declares.
  That says something about the  prob-
lems of the  estuary and  why the
forthcoming EPA study  of this rich
body of  water has support in  Con-
gress. As Senator Charles McC. Ma-
thias of  Maryland said in  recent  hear-
ings, "1  can't imagine any other single
natural resource  in this  country that
demands protection  more, both  in
terms of its inherent resources, and  of
its dangers, which are increasing."
  To which  Captain Smith might add a
heartfelt "Amen." a
*Tn
-------
    Challenge  of  a   Louisiana  Swamp
 Along the Atchafalaya  River in cen-
tral  Louisiana lies  a  spectacular
swamp area about the size of Dela-
ware.
 It  is laced with  natural lakes and
bayous, shaded by  cypress, tupelo
gum.  and  oak trees, overhung with
Spanish  moss. Its waters teem with
fish, including Louisiana's gourmet
specialty,  crawfish.  In  recent years
the  commercial fishing  in the Basin
has  produced a $25-million catch an-
nually, with crawfish  topping  the list
as the most valuable species.
 The Atchafalaya Basin  swampland  is
a bountiful home for  wild animals and
birds, including such  endangered spe-
cies as  the black bear, the brown
pelican, and the alligator.
 Boaters who cruise  along the canals
and natural waterways of this watery
basin are awed by  the natural  beauty.
Herons, egrets and bitterns wing their
way through the  corridors  of this
shadowy forest.
 Even though the Atchafalaya's recre-
ational opportunities are not well
known nationally,  visitors  in this
waterland  bring  Louisiana  an esti-
mated $42  million a year in recreation
revenue.
 Moreover, the  Atchafalaya has  a
unique and  critical  use as a safety
valve for the Mississippi  in the high-
water months every  spring and espe-
cially  during periodic  disastrous
floods. It  is the sluice that has kept
Baton Rouge and New  Orleans from
being washed away every 20 years or
so.
 The  Atchafalaya River  and  its adja-
cent waterways have been filling up
with silt, reducing their flood-carrying
capacity.  The  Army   Corps of Engi-
Cypress and tupelo gum trees, many festooned with Spanish moss.  thri\e in the
wetlands.
neers believes that widening and deep-
ening portions of the main  river chan-
nel would allow the silt to be earned
more effectively through  the  Basin
and into the  Gulf of Mexico. Conser-
vationists fear such dredging would
drain the swamps  that support the
extraordinary abundance of wildlife.
 At the request of Congress and Loui-
siana officials.  EPA is working with
the  Corps, the State, and  other Fed-
eral agencies to prepare a comprehen-
sive water management plan  that will
provide flood control and yet  preserve
the  swamp  areas necessary for  wild-
life.
 The Basin  so far  has been a  good
safety valve, a key  component  in the
elaborate  system of levees and  flood-
ways built by the Corps of Engineers
to  protect people and property along
the  Mississippi's last MX) miles. Por-
tions of its water are diverted into the
Atchafalaya far upstream  from  Baton
Rouge by a  diversion dam to reduce
the level of the lower Mississippi and
control flooding.

Three-in-One- Flood way

 The diverted water has a short cut to
the  Gulf  of  Mexico, about 120  miles
instead  of 500 by way  of  New  Orle-
ans.  It  reaches the  Gulf through the
natural  Atchafalaya  outlet  at Morgan
City. 70 miles west of New  Orleans,
and through an artificial  channel at
Wax Lake.  10 miles  farther west.
 Considerable dredging has already
been done on  the main  Atchafalaya
channel. Levees  have  been  built  on
each side  of the northern  portion.
Outside  each levee are lowlands that
can be flooded also when the main
channel  is  overloaded.  At the south-
ern end  of the Basin all  three flood-
ways become one, and it is here that
silt and  mud are  filling the takes and
swamps, steadily  destroying  the wet-
lands.  Flood-borne silt  is  already
forming a new delta in  the Gulf south
of Morgan  City.
 In addition  to Mississippi water,  the
Atchafalaya  wetlands get  a  constant
supply of water from rainfall (averag-
ing about 60 inches annually) and from
the Red River, which  extends  north-
westward through Louisiana to Arkan-
sas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
 The  problem  of managing  the  At-
chafalaya floodway is a maze of ap-
parently  conflicting interests that must
be  balanced  against  each other and
against the expected  costs and bene-
fits. Flood management can hurt  or
benefit wildlife habitats and fishing.
Siltation  can ruin  wilderness areas and
make flood control less  and less effec-
tive. Landowners  want their acreage
drained and  want to be paid by  the
Government for permission to let it  be
flooded.  Boaters  and sportsmen are
attracted to the  natural waterways, but
they want canals and dredging  to
make  them more accessible.  Oil and
gas men don't  mind  the floods—they
can drill anywhere—but  they need
              Continuing i>n patic 6
                          PAGE 5

-------
Aerial view of pail of the Atchafalaya Basin, a pattern of lakes, river channels, sand
bars, deltas and swamps.
deep waterways to get  equipment in
and barges out. Conservationists want
to preserve the  habitat for the beavers.
otters,  waterfowl  and alligators; they
worry  about industrial  and pesticide
pollution from the Red  River.  Craw-
fishermen want a healthy  catch  year,
which  means seasonal Hooding and a
fairly dry period in late  summer  when
the females can  burrow in the mud
and lay their eggs.


50 Years of Planning

  EPA   has been  in  this  maze  since
1973.  studying  the environmental  ef-
fects,  particularly  those concerned
with water quality, of various propos-
als by  the  Corps of Engineers for
future work on the Atchafalaya Flood-
way Project.
  For  nearly  50 years the  Corps has
been making plans  for  enlarging and
improving the floodway, and  from
time to time  has  dredged,  diked, and
built gates and sluices. The  Corps'
plans now call for widening and  deep-
ening the main  Atchafalaya channel to
9.200 square meters <100.000 square
feet) in  cross-section. They  say this
will  minimize  siltation  at moderate
flows and so help the whole floodway
to carry 1.5 million cubic feet of water
per second, one half of  the peak flood
for which all  the Corps'  control works
on the  lower Mississippi are designed.
  Under the  National Environmental
Policy  Act of 1969,  an  environmental
impact study must be made before the
Corps  can take  such an action and
before   Congress  can appropriate the
PAGE 6
funds.  Resolutions in both  Houses of
Congress  in  1972 urged the Corps to
review the whole  project  with EPA,
the  State of Louisiana,  and other
Federal  agencies "with  a  view to
developing a comprehensive  plan for
the  management  and preservation of
the  water and  related land resources
of the Atchafalaya  River  Basin"  in-
cluding "provisions  for reductions of
siltation, improvement of  water qual-
ity,  and possible  improvement of the
area for commercial and  sport fish-
ing."
 EPA's share of this  work has con-
centrated  on  studies  of water  quality,
ecology, and multipurpose resource
management. Agency people have
been involved  directly and  through
contract  research for the  last three
years.


EPA Study Teams

 Victor W.  Lambou of the  Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Labo-
ratory  at Las Vegas, Nev., is project
officer and leader of a study team of
EPA scientists  and technicians based
in  Baton Rouge, La.
 The Las Vegas  helicopter team has
flown  extensive water sampling mis-
sions  throughout  the Atchafalaya
Basin, establishing about  180 sampling
sites.  Water and bottom sediment
samples are  also  taken  by two-man
teams  in  small  boats,  using a labora-
tory houseboat for on-the-spot analy-
•sis.
 Major research for EPA  on  the
Basin's ecology and  resource  manage-
ment  has been done  on contract  by
Louisiana State University  scientists
Sherwood M.  Gagliano and  Johannes
L. van Beek. who last  year  formed
their own company. Coastal Environ-
ments. Inc.. at Baton Rouge,  to con-
tinue  the work, now in  its third year.
 The  three-year study by Coastal En-
vironments.  Inc., will cost EPA about
$240,000, and the water quality studies
by EPA people, both from the air and
on the surface, are expected to total
$300.000  by  the end of this fiscal year.
 The  Agency has worked closely with
the Corps of  Engineers, the  Interior
Department's  Fish and  Wildlife Serv-
ice, and  Louisiana agencies  in charge
of public  works,  environmental  con-
servation, and  resource  management
throughout the joint study period, said
Peter  Smith of the Office of  Federal
Activities in  Washington.


Parallel Interests

 "We have  found  in many cases  that
our interest  are parallel, not conflict-
ing,"  he  said.  "The  Corps of Engi-
neers  wants  to limit siltation as much
as we do, though for different reasons.
We see the filling up and drying out of
wetlands; they see the clogging  and
reduced effectiveness of the  floodway
channels.
 "Everyone participating in  this inter-
agency, interdisciplinary project  has
learned from the others."
 Dr.  Edwin  Royce, Office  of  Re-
search and Development. Washington.
put the same conclusion in a different
way:  "We found  at the beginning of
Oil and  gas wells bring industry  to some
parts of the basin.

-------
our study  that the  Army engineers
were only partly aware of the environ-
mental problems—and  the  opportuni-
ties—facing them.  1  hope our joint
efforts  have helped to educate  them;
we have certainly  learned a lot. Today
the environmental study  is an  ac-
cepted part of planning for manage-
ment of the Basin. Its importance  and
value are no longer questioned."
 The  Corps  has prepared  a draft
environmental  impact statement, soon
to be  released, which devotes consid-
erable  attention to  ecological  effects
and which  treats  the  proposed  flood-
way expansion as  a multipurpose plan
for the whole Atchafalaya Basin.
 The  results of EPA's water quality
studies are not yet  available;  most of
the baseline data  are in. but scientists
are still  working on the simulation
modeling and the  predictive aspects of
the  water  quality changes that have
been observed  since the study began.


Some Recommendations

  Preliminary  recommendations have
been made, however,  by  Mr.  Gagli-
ano and  Mr. van  Beek, after the  first
two years of their study. They say the
Atchafalaya  ecosystem  is   being
harmed by sediments and undergoing
"accelerated  succession"  to  a dry-
land  environment, detrimental to both
wetland resources and floodway  effi-
ciency. They recommend:
 • Limited  channel  dredging with
dredge spoils used to bank the channel
more  narrowly than  the  Corps  has
previously proposed.
Crawfish arc the  Basin's  most  valuable  fishery resource.
 Raccoon  searches  for food  in the  Atch-
 afalaya swamp.
 • Setting up  "management  zones,"
seven  on each side of the river, in
which  seasonal flooding could be sep-
arately controlled  so as to preserve
existing land uses  as much as  possi-
ble.  Some zones would  be predomi-
nately  forests, some  swamps and
lakes,  some "exploitative" (agricul-
ture,  oil  drilling),  with  buffer areas
between.
 • The zone system  would  distinguish
the "pluvial" swamps, whose  water-
comes from local  rainfall,  from the
"fluvial"  swamps  subject to  seasonal
flooding.
 • The life cycle of the crawfish should
serve as a guide to swamp water levels.
What's good for the crawfish is good for
the wetlands: seasonal flooding and
enough drying to let oxygen  help de-
compose  dead plants  on the swamp
floor.
 • The banks  of  distributary  chan-
nels—those  that carry  flood water to
the sea—should be managed  to  mini-
mize backflow  sedimentation. If sedi-
ments  can reach the fluvial  swamps
only  when a  flood overflows  the
banks,  the  swamps  receive  just the
top water, which carries relatively less
sediment, and  most of the silt load
would  go  into the Gulf of Mexico.


 Deltas  and  Hyacinths

 The  Atchafalaya project  has many
other interesting aspects that can only
be touched on in a  brief article.
 The southern  edge  of the  area  is an
estuarine  ecology;  tides and  storms
bring salt  water into the  river mouth,
the Wax Lake channel, and numerous
bays. Deltas are forming at both flood
outlets. Their  growth must  be pre-
dicted and  navigation maintained.
Some scientists wish to encourage the
delta  growth  and foster the develop-
ment of new marine wetlands.
 In  the  Basin itself large areas of
water hyacinth are growing. This nuis-
ance  plant  that clogs waterways  and
hastens eutrophication is now believed
to have  potential  uses  for  sewage
treatment and water purification. Pro-
posals have been  made to  harvest the
water hyacinth for animal feed supple-
ment and garden mulching  and also to
grow it deliberately in  wastewater
treatment systems. Aquaculture of fish
and  crawfish in ponds is  also  being
studied.
 But the  prime values of the Atchafa-
laya  remain  what they have been for
several generations: a unique and very
productive freshwater wetland and  a
lifesaving outlet for the raging Missis-
sippi.
 More than  a century ago the Missis-
sippi very  nearly  carved its own
course through  these swamps. This
natural event  would have left  the
docks  dry and idle  at Baton  Rouge
and  New Orleans  and  changed  the
geography of Louisiana.
 When man  blocked that change by
building dams to  keep the  Mississippi
in its  channel  and to divert only
controllable portions  of highwater  and
floods into the Atchafalaya. the wet-
lands were saved for a while.  Now
the challenge is to keep the wetlands
intact for  another hundred years  and
still  prevent  disastrous floods on  the
lower Mississippi. n

                           PAGE?

-------
CURB
 Are you planning to buy a boat, or
do you already have one? If so,  and
your craft is equipped with a  toilet,
you may  be affected by some  recent
EPA  water pollution  regulations,
which  require that most  boats  be
equipped  with special devices to con-
trol the discharge  of sewage. New
boats—defined as  those built after
January,  1975—will  have  to  be so
equipped  by January 30  of next year.
Older vessels have  three additional
years to comply.
 EPA's regulations are part  of the
Agency's plan to control water pollu-
tion caused  by the dumping of human
sewage into the Nation's waterways.
Congress when  it  passed  the 1972
Water Pollution  Control Act Amend-
ments gave  EPA the task of control-
ling pollution from human wastes dis-
charged  from the more  than 600,000
boats and ships which  regularly use
the Nation's rivers, lakes and coastal
waters.
 The volume of sewage discharged
from vessels in U.S. waters is esti-
mated to  equal that of a medium-size
city. The contributors include 550,000
toilet-equipped recreational  boats,
54,000 small commercial  vessels, 6,000
tow and tug boats, almost 1,500 Army
Corps of  Engineers  vessels,  710 Navy
ships, about 700 oceangoing commer-
cial  ships,  and a  large number of
foreign  vessels  which  enter  U.S.
waters.
 There are good  reasons  for being
concerned  about the  pollution of
waterways  by human wastes.  If im-
properly treated, sewage contains
large numbers of living bacteria which
can cause  outbreaks of waterborne
diseases such as typhoid  and hepatitis.
Sewage also contains chemicals, some
of which  alter the natural balance of
life in waters by promoting the  exces-
sive growth of plant life or  by  reduc-
ing populations of wildlife and fish. In
addition, no one wants to use polluted
waters for  boating,  fishing or  swim-
ming.
 To tackle  the vessel waste problem,
the Agency asked for and listened to
the opinions of  a  large number of
affected groups:  the boating public,
commercial  shippers, the U.S.  Navy,
environmental groups, and  the U.S.
Coast Guard, which  is  charged with
PAGE 8
enforcement responsibilities.  EPA's
Office of Water-Planning and Stand-
ards wanted  the answers to some
tough  questions: How much cleanup
of vessel  wastes would it be feasible
to require? What  technology was
available to do it? How much would it
cost? Would the costs involved  have
any serious  effect on the commercial
activity of  U.S. vessels?  Could the
regulation be effectively enforced?
 After several years of work,  EPA
issued final regulations on Jan. 29.

          New Rules

 The  new  rules  were formulated
around the principle that the chemical
and physical properties of  water bod-
ies are not always the same; therefore,
especially  sensitive  waters—those
which can't cleanse themselves easily
through natural processes—should be
granted a higher degree  of protection
than other waters.
 Based on  that principle, the  EPA
regulations  forbid any discharge of
vessel  wastes  into most  freshwater
bodies within any State. These include
landlocked lakes, reservoirs and  other
freshwater impoundments,  and rivers
not usable for interstate travel. Gener-
ally speaking, then, small or  sensitive
bodies of water get special  protection.
 Sewage  may lawfully be  discharged
into other waters, but it will have to
be treated first by on-board equipment
to meet  stringent health  standards.
Waters in this category  include most
sea-connected lakes, rivers that can be
used for  interstate  travel, the Great
Lakes, estuaries,  and coastal  waters.
Initial treatment standards for bacteria
and solid  material will have to be met,
either in  1977 (for "new"  vessels) or
in 1980 (for older vessels).
 Even tougher treatment standards
will go into  effect later, although boat-
owners who act quickly to meet the
initial standards may qualify for an
exemption from any further require-
ments.
 The  terms of the  exemptions are
complex, and affected  boat-owners
should check the regulations in detail.
But, in summary, a new vessel meet-
ing the initial treatment standards any-
time before  January  1980 will be ex-
empt from  any further  requirements
             By Peter Acly*

during the operable life of the equip-
ment already installed. Also, older
vessels which meet  the initial require-
ments by January  1978 qualify for a
similar exemption.
 To comply  with  the EPA  regula-
tions, many owners of toilet-equipped
vessels will have to install new equip-
ment that  has been approved by the
U.S. Coast Guard. This will  involve
the installation of either a "holding
tank"—from which wastes can  be
pumped out for treatment ashore—for
use in no-discharge areas, or a "flow-
through" device for  use on waters
where sewage must be treated before
discharge.
 The  1972  Act also provides for the
designation of specific no-discharge
areas  in  waterways into which the
discharge  of treated sewage would
otherwise be allowed. One such provi-
sion permits EPA, if petitioned to  do
so by a State, to extend  special pro-
tection  to  waters near shellfish beds,
drinking water intakes or swimming
areas.  Another provision allows the
States to extend no-discharge protec-
tion to other designated waters, pro-
vided that EPA  is first able to deter-
mine  that  adequate  pump-out and
treatment  facilities are available  to
service all vessels using those waters.
To date,  special no-discharge actions
under the  latter provision  have  been
approved for the States of Missouri,
Michigan,  New Hampshire, Vermont,
Wisconsin,  New York and California.
The  Michigan and  Wisconsin no-dis-
charge  actions have caused concern
on the international  front:  Canada has
expressed the opinion that those par-
ticular  no-discharge actions interfere
with the free passage of Canadian
shipping  through the  Michigan and
Wisconsin portions  of  the Great
Lakes.  Discussions with the Canadi-
ans are under way to clarify this issue.
 The Coast Guard is responsible for
determining which  specific  treatment
or holding  devices  are acceptable to
meet the  EPA standards. It will also
enforce the regulations by inspecting
boats  and ships to see that  needed
equipment is in place and functioning
properly. °

*Peter Ac/v is cm  EPA Headquarters
Press Officer.

-------
  YOUTHFUL   WATER  SAMPLERS
  Environmental education has taken
 on a new  meaning for thousands of
 high  school students throughout the
 country.
  They learn to test water for oxygen
 content, turbidity,  and  other  pollution
 indicators  and  then take their equip-
 ment and  notebooks  to survey  the
 pollution   problems  of lakes  and
 streams in their own neighborhoods.
  Such learn-by-doing programs are un-
 der way in Ohio, Washington State.
 Florida, Georgia,  Maryland, Wiscon-
 sin.  Kentucky,  and  New Jersey, to
 name only a few. Some are sponsored
 by the  school districts and ambitious
 teachers, some  by nearby university
 departments of environmental sciences
 and education. Still others are sparked
 by private foundations.
  EPA's Regional Offices  have  fre-
 quently given active support and tech-
 nical assistance for these projects.
  Typical  of such programs is  the
 Watershed  Heritage  project  in Ohio,
 illustrated in these photos.
  Watershed Heritage was started  by
 the Institute for  Environmental  Edu-
 cation, a  non-profit organization in
 Cleveland, with  support from  the
 Ohio EPA. the Region  V Office of
 EPA in Chicago,  the  EPA  laborato-
 ries and training center in Cincinnati.
 and the U.S. Office  of Technical  and
 Environmental Education.
 What  is it?  Insect larvae, small crusta-
 ceans, and worms collected from a stream
 are indicators of the water's quality.
 Thirteen of Ohio's State Universities
helped  in planning the project, and
five of them are  supervising regular
field surveys of water quality by high
school students in their areas.
 The students test the quality of lakes
and streams  in their neighborhoods on
regular schedules, using equipment
and techniques approved by  both
State and Federal EPA's.
 High  school teachers in  the project
receive training from the Institute.
Inexpensive field kits for chemical and
bacteriologic testing can be purchased
from the Institute or borrowed.
 Students  in their first year on the
project learn to test water for acidity.
dissolved oxygen, flow rates, and coli-
form bacteria. In the second year they
learn more sophisticated  tests. The
university provides a graduate student
to assist the teacher in the  field and in
the  laboratory.  For  the teachers the
project  often provides part of their
academic credit for advanced degrees.
 Data obtained  by student water qual-
ity inspectors is never used in litiga-
tion or in  establishing water quality
violations,  said Joseph Chadbourne,
Institute President.  But  it can  and
sometimes does  serve as an early
warning system, alerting the appropri-
ate regulatory agency  to make its own
spot check.
 Watershed  Heritage is  now in its
third year.  It was selected last fall by
the  Department of Housing and Ur-
ban Development and the American
Revolution Bicentennial Administra-
tion for inclusion in their joint "Hori-
zons on Display" list of places and
projects worthy  for visitors to see
during 1976. a
Team of students, with teacher and graduate student advisor, spread out to monitor an Ohio
creek. While  some  collect biota (living things) from the water.others take water samples.
                                   Samples are  taken back to the school
                                   laboratory for further quality checks.

                                                            PAGE 9

-------
 The
 Metric
 System   Is
Coming
Five feet two; eye a of blue,
Oh what those five feet can do,
Hits anybody seen m\ gal?
  This golden  oldie  of the Jazz  Age
 may have  to be rewritten some day,
 with my gal's height as  157 centime-
 ters.
  The United States is moving steadily
 into the  metric  system.  Cigarette
 lengths are  given  in millimeters,  skis
 in centimeters.  Many auto engines
 have capacity  ratings in liters,  not
 cubic inches. Blood donors give blood
 in pints, but the  sterile  plastic bags
 really hold  500 cubic centimeters each,
 a generous pint.
  Weather  reports on television  and
 radio and the newspaper give tempera-
 tures in degrees  Celsius as well as
 degrees Fahrenheit.
  By 1980,  the  Treasury Department
 has decreed, liquor sold in the United
 States must be bottled  in prescribed
 metric sizes: liter instead  of quart, 750
 milliliters  instead of fifth,  etc. A
 transition period will start next Octo-
 ber when metric sizes in liquor bottles
 will be optional.
  Although  miles and gallons still have
 a strong hold on the average Ameri-
 can's consciousness, it seems only a
 matter of  time till  they will be  re-
 placed by kilometers  and liters.
 Pounds and acres will  give way to
 kilograms and hectares.
  The metric system  is  increasing in
 use  throughout the world for  two
 principal reasons: It is simple and  it is
 a decimal system.  The U.S. monetary
 system has always been  based on
 decimals (factors  of ten).  The dime
 equals one-tenth of a dollar and the
 cent equals one-hundredth of a dollar.
 By  contrast, our customary measure-
 ment systems involve units which re-
 quire the use of fractions.

 PAGE 10
                                                SPEED LIMIT


                                                   KM/H
                                                          11 M 11111111111 III 11

                                                3   1    5   6'   7
 President  Ford signed  into  law last
Dec. 23  the Metric  Conversion Act,
declaring a  "national policy of coordi-
nating the increasing  use of the metric
system  in  the United  States"  and
establishing a U.S.  Metric  Board  to
coordinate the  "voluntary  conver-
sion."
 While the  law sets no deadline, many
American  industries  are   actively
pressing for conversion because  of
their extensive international trade with
countries using the metric system.
 KPA is doing its bit to help convert
the  United  States to the metric system
of measurement, officially known  as
the  International System of Units.
 EPA is ahead of most  Federal agen-
cies in using metric  measurements.
according to a three-man Agency task
force that  reported last year to Alvin
Aim,  Assistant Administrator  for
Planning and Management.
 More than three years ago,  in Janu-
ary  1973.  an "all-hands" memoran-
dum from  Deputy Administrator Rob-
ert Fri urged the use of metric units in
all EPA standards, reports, and docu-
ments. Common equivalents  (in feet,
acres, pounds, etc.) should be given in
parentheses whenever desirable,  the
memorandum said.
 Research people in EPA laboratories
are already "thoroughly familiar with
the  metric  system." the  report said.
and laboratory functions "may require

-------
little or  no education or ...  policy
changes and actual conversion."
 The task force noted that conversion
may present problems, even  encounter
resistance, in EPA's engineering func-
tions, where the  old  units are firmly
entrenched.  The report recommended
a three-phase "plan of attack":
  •  Promote Agency  awareness  of
the  metric  system  and persuade em-
ployees  of its usefulness and  inevita-
bility;
  •  Develop specific conversion poli-
cies  and draft  the  necessary  Agency
Orders,   Code of  Federal Regulation
Notices,  etc.; and
  •  Carry  out  the conversion  within
a detailed and  flexible time  schedule.
 The task  force was made  up of
William  A.  Cawley. Chairman,  and
Ferial S. Bishop,  both of the Office of
Research and  Development, and John
A. Alter. Office of Planning and Man-
agement.
 Mr. Alter,  who  has been  named
EPA's coordinator for metric conver-
sion, said that  a central working group
with representatives from each Assist-
ant  Administrator's  Office and   the
Regional Office of  Intergovernmental
Operations will be named soon to  help
deal with significant conversion re-
quirements for such programs as mon-
itoring, permits, and construction.
  An informal, unscientific .survey by
the  EPA Journal  revealed  that, while
metric units are used extensively and
increasingly  in  Agency reports and
publications,  the  practice is  far from
unanimous.
 Water pollution: standards that  are
developed from research using metric
measures of ten have to be translated
in  engineering applications  from milli-
grams per  liter(metric) to pounds  per
thousand  gallons. Often the  conver-
sion can be by-passed by  using parts
per million.
 Air  pollution: here some  of the  old
units are locked into  the Nation's
customs and  even the language of the
law. Auto exhaust pollutant limits  are
set in grams  per mile,  a  halfway
metric measure.  "We  will  continue
using grams per  mile and  gallons  per
mile until the United States switches
to kilometers." says Eric Stork. Dep-
uty  Assistant Administrator for  Mo-
bile Source  Pollution  Control. One
small omen appears: motorcycle pollu-
tant standards are given in grams  per
kilometer!
 The Office  of Air Quality Planning
and Standards in North  Carolina,  un-
der  Deputy  Assistant  Administrator
Bernard Steigerwald.  issues  all  its
emission factors  in both metric and
old-style units.  Industry  emission lim-
its  are given in kilograms  per metric-
ton (2200 Ibs) and pounds per English
ton (2000 Ibs.) New emission  fact ore
for vehicles are also listed  in both  old
and new units.  But industrial standards
that are set  per unit  of production
must  follow the industry's  customary
unit, which may be a ton, a barrel, or
I.(XX) cubic feet.
 Solid waste: This is still measured in
pounds and  tons,  and when it  is
burned, the heating value  is given in
British thermal units.
 Radiation: No problem here; radioac-
tivity  is solidly scientific  and metric.
 Construction grants:  EPA's biggest
task, in terms of money, is  necessarily
tied  to the construction  industry and
its  traditions. Sewage plants treat  so
many gallons  per day;  their construc-
tion requires tons  of  sand, bags of
cement. 20-inch  concrete blocks, and
eight-inch bricks.
 It seems  likely, however,  that even
the conservative construction industry
will gradually change to  metric meas-
ures.  The task  force  has recom-
mended that  all  EPA  contractors  be
required  to use  them  in their work
statements, contracts,  and  reports,
with  the  equivalent  units given in
parentheses.
 After a while everyone will get tired
of the parentheses, n

                           PAGE II

-------
           EPA  &  THE   HEWS  MEDIA
                                                                             By Patricia L. Cahn*
 The proper relationship between gov-
ernment and  media in a  democratic
society has  been the subject of fruitful
controversy in this country for the last
200 years, and longer.
 Thomas Jefferson, saying he would
rather  have press sans  government
than government  sans press, took the
libertarian side of the question, but
that  view has not  won universal ac-
claim, even in this enlightened age. As
long as government and  media  exist,
they will be  adversaries  simply be-
cause each  has  a different interest.
The media want  total  freedom to
report  what they see as truth, and
many in government would like noth-
ing better than a constant stream of
favorable news  and comment  about
cherished programs, with  a comforta-
ble silence  when these programs go
wrong.  Each party is  bound  to be
disappointed.
 Although government and the  media
are friendly adversaries,  the underly-
ing truth is  that they have an absolute
need for each other, a  need that  is
given tacit acknowledgement in the
fact that there is not a single agency in
the Federal government that does not
have  some  sort  of staff to  provide
services to the  media.  All of  which
leads  me to the  main  point:  that the
media have a definite influence on the
way environmental policy is formu-
lated and carried  out.
 Rarely is such policy  put together in
a  vacuum.  In the  promulgating of
regulations, EPA  insists that the regu-
lation writer must take  into considera-
tion, and state in  writing, what the
impact of this regulation will be on the
public.
 Ambitious programs can be  doomed
to  failure if  launched without regard to
public  opinion,  and in  the  face of
strong public opposition. On the other
hand,  such programs  can proceed
rather  well, with the  inevitable ups
and downs, if the media have the facts
and report them, thus tilling the soil of
public opinion.
 The  environmental movement  itself
would  not  have  become the  popular
cause it is without  wide media cover-
age. Our activities have high visibility
and high controversy, and you can be
sure that the press and broadcast
PAGE 12
people take an'intense interest in
almost everything EPA does.  The
nature of that interest varies according
to the audience the medium reaches.
 There are five major classifications of
media covering EPA.  First,  the most
comprehensive coverage is  by trade
journals.  These  are essentially news-
letters which are subscribed to by
thousands of organizations and  indi-
viduals  across  the country, people
who need a  continuous, detailed  look
at all the news or potential news to
come out of EPA. The reporters  who
represent these newsletters come into
the Agency every day, but they spend
more time  with the program  people
than in the Public Affairs Office.
 Also interested in the technical or
legal details  of  EPA  actions are the
representatives of the  environmental
activist  groups. These  organizations
may not send somebody around every
day  or  even every week,  but  they
keep a close eye  on  us.  Each  pub-
lishes a newsletter, too, so they are in
that sense media themselves.  But
more importantly,  they  act as an in-
stant conduit for  information  to the
mass  media, often to our consterna-
tion or embarrassment.
 Third,  we see a lot  of reporters
stationed in  D.C.  who are employed
by local newspapers from  around the
country.  These reporters are either
assigned  permanently  to the environ-
ment beat or else cover it on an ad
hoc  basis as major stories emerge.
They usually drop by  to follow up on
a speech or a news release,  or attend
a press conference. They  are inter-
ested primarily in  how  an announce-
ment affects their local areas.
 A fourth group consists of reporters
or columnists of  national reputation
and the  network TV reporters. They
cover only  the stories  of major  con-
sumer or topical interest to the nation
as a whole.
 The fifth and final category  of media
contacts is local reporters calling  long
distance—most often from radio sta-
tions around the country. They are
interested in getting an  official to
make a brief comment they can record
on tape for rebroadcast later  that  day.
 Our Public Affairs Office has 8 peo-
ple who spend fulltime in media  rela-
tions. Each has a special knowledge in
one  area  such as air or water or
pesticides.  They keep in close contact
with  the  operating  level  of the
Agency, write press  releases and fact
sheets,  and spend a  tremendous part
of their time answering phone calls
from media people who are usually on
a tight  deadline  and  need  information
quickly.
 Our "information specialists"  give
the reporters all the  information  they
can muster from their own knowledge
and then put them in touch with good
contacts in the various programs.
 It is our  policy at EPA that anyone
in  the press can talk  to anyone in the
Agency.  A  journalist is under no
obligation to tell us  in the Public
Affairs  Office who he has spoken to
or wants to see, unless he prefers that
we make the arrangements. Likewise,
EPA officials don't have to account to
Public  Affairs when  they talk to any-
one  on the outside. There is no
attempt to  control access to those who
know.  This has  given us red faces  at
times,  when a  reporter gets slightly
different points  of view from two or
more program  people. But that's a
price we pay for the  openness we feel
is essential.
 Mr. Train and the  Deputy  Adminis-
trator, John Quarles,  have made them-
selves available day and night.
 Even  if we wanted to be  secretive
(which  we don't), we would have a
hard time doing so  because of the
Freedom  of Information  Act.  It
obliges all  agencies to make  known a
broad  range  of data  on their opera-
tions,  with certain lawful exceptions
like unpublished official policy recom-
mendations  and so-called trade se-
crets.
 We are  happy to say that  we  have
never denied an FOI request from a
news source—to maintain  that record
we once had to defy a State Depart-
ment request for silence on a Korean
rat poison case—but, so far, we're
batting  1.000.
 There isn't an  agency in Washington

* Excerpted from 1976  "Lecture on Me-
dia" given by Patricia  L. Calm. Director,
Office of Public Affairs, a! the University
of Wisconsin (it Green  Btiv. March 16.

-------
that  has decentralized  power to the
degree that  EPA has.  In that respect
we are highly fashionable,  because
there is a  great  hue and cry in the
nation today  on the  need  for  local
input to Federal officials. Ofttimes. we
have  to send inquiring reporters back
to their local communities  to get the
facts  on a  case because that's where
the  decisions  are  made.  Reporters
generally don't believe this until they
see it.
  Responding to the media is a big part
of our job  but  no means all of it. We
quite frankly use the  mass media  in
every  way we  legitimately  can to get
information out to the public.
  Propaganda you say! Well,  perhaps.
There are a great many definitions  of
that  buzz-word, and  1  tend  to  agree
with  Merrill  and  Lowenstein who
comment  in  "Media.  Messages, and
Men." that in an open society propa-
ganda is  pluralistic and competitive
and provides  the information and
ideas for political argument and for the
formation  of  public opinion. If you
buy  their definition. 1 will admit to the
use of propaganda.
  An agency such as EPA has to make
some efforts to compete, not  so  much
with the news  media but with multi-
million dollar advertising budgets  of
commercial polluters.  But we are pro-
hibited  by  law from buying space  or
time in the media.  And besides, our
public affairs  budget is  miniscule  in
comparison with those of industry.
  1 recall  that  the  president of one
electric power company spent  more
money on one  series of fullpage news-
paper  ads  protesting EPA's require-
ments for  gas stack scrubbers than
EPA spent on its  public affairs  pro-
gram for an entire year.
 So, we can't really compete.  But we
do use every avenue  within our legal
and  budgetary  means to get our mes-
sage out.
 We  distribute news releases to 750
newspapers  and  news bureaus  in
Washington.  D.C.  (Did you know
that  there are an estimated 2,000 re-
porters in Washington?)  Then, we
mail  releases everywhere in  the  Na-
tion to weeklies, dailies. TV and radio
stations,  universities, foundations, la-
bor unions, trade associations, corpo-
rations and environmental  organiza-
tions—but they have to  ask first  to be
put on our mailing list. We don't  mail
indiscriminately because it's costly
and wasteful.
 Our Press  Office  also prepares a
daily  recorded radio  feed, in the form
of a news message or a brief interview
with  an  Agency spokesman, which
any radio station across the country
can pick up with a phone call.
 We  produce  30- or 60-second  spots
for television  and radio  and distribute
them  to all commercial stations across
the country. Their use depends on the
contribution of  free broadcasting or
telecasting time by the stations.
 My  office—in  fact, all the Agency
officials who come in contact with the
media—value their relationships with
reporters and are careful to  maintain
their  trust. Writers  who report accu-
rately and fully can  assist our policy-
making in very material ways.
 I believe the media's influence on the
environmental policymaking process
tends far more to the positive than the
negative.  Let  me tell you of an un-
comfortable but  positive  instance  that
illustrates  how the media can steer us
away  from our own bungles.
 Two or  three years ago. we  devel-
oped  our now infamous Transporta-
tion  Control  Plans.  We proposed  a
wide  range of modifications, including
exclusive bus lanes, flexible traffic
management,  computerized signals,
car pools, van pools, off-street parking
bans,  higher bridge  tolls, parking sur-
charges,  semi-annual auto inspection.
and so on. We even talked about  gas
rationing.
  We  thought  we had done a brilliant
job.  The thing we forgot  about was
public opinion, and the  media lost no
time  in  bringing  that  opinion  most
forcefully to our attention.  There was
massive  opposition to any  transporta-
tion  control plan  which wouid have
the effect of forcing or even gradually
easing the motorist out of his  car or
making  the car  more  expensive to
operate.
  We  were compelled by the irresisti-
ble force of public  opinion, expressed
in blazing editorials, to back off and
admit that we  had been "a bit prema-
ture." We  realized  that  without a
great  deal  of  public  education,
changed  social values,  and far better
mass  transit, federally imposed  trans-
portation control  plans would never
work.
  Instead, we  developed  new  plans
designed to encourage the  cities to
move in  a more progressive direction.
Our  Regional  Administrators believe
that the  voluntary approach of cooper-
ation  with Governors and  Mayors  will
produce  better results in the long run.
  I can't  think of a better  instance to
demonstrate  the  old truism that  the
media serve  to prevent  bureaucrats
from  pursuing unpopular  policies in
isolation and  against the expressed
will of the people.
  So the  media have a definite influ-
ence  on EPA policymaking:  some-
times steering us  away from an  un-
wise  course,  sometimes  goading us
into taking  actions prematurely, cer-
tainly by assuring that our policies  will
be  made  in  the  full  glare of  the
media's   spotlight.  It  causes us to
squint occasionally  (some of us wear a
permanently puckered brow!) but  we
welcome the light, n
 Televisions cameras cover I: PA auto pollution hearing.
                                                                                                         PAGE  13

-------
REPORTS
 The Sixth Annual  Report of the
Council on Environmental Quality be-
gins on an ominous  note.  Its first
chapter, "Carcinogens in the  Environ-
ment"  bluntly states:
 "This chapter  concerns  cancer.  It
discusses several probable  causes but
focuses on one,  the  chemicals intro-
duced  into our environment by our
consumption pattern and way of life.
It  describes cancer (not one disease,
but a family of them), and considers
the special problems  of diagnosis oc-
casioned by the latency-period charac-
teristic of cancer.  It analyzes the
difficulty of screening cancer-causing
agents  (carcinogens) before approving
them for mass production  and distri-
bution, and cites current efforts to
improve methods for testing poten-
tially  hazardous  substances.  It con-
cludes  by arguing  that  prevention
rather  than treatment offers the  most
effective attack on cancer today."
 Although cancer  is  not  the  only
disease linked to environmental  fac-
tors, it  is  one  of the most important.
costly, and rapidly accelerating health
problems in the United States:
 "Cancer  killed a reported  358,400
citizens in 1974. About one million are
under  treatment  for the disease, and
each year 900,000 new cases  are diag-
nosed  . . .  The American Cancer So-
ciety estimates that 25 percent of the
213 million people now living in the
United  States  will ultimately  develop
some form  of cancer."
 The World Health  Organization esti-
mates  that 60 to 90 percent of all
cancer is related to environmental fac-
tors.  A  disconcerting and  growing
body of evidence indicates that  man-
made hazards,  many of them  chemical
in  nature, may be  responsible for an
incidence of cancer that has more than
doubled since the turn of the century.
Each year thousands  of new  chemical
compounds are invented by  U.S. in-
dustry  and hundreds  are  introduced
commercially and go into use.
 Unfortunately,  the  capacity to de-
velop  new chemical  substances far
exceeds the ability of scientific investi-
gators  to  determine the carcinogenic
PAGE 14
potential of the chemicals.  "In the
past ten years  the production of syn-
thetic  organic chemicals has expanded
by 225 percent; relatively few of the
new compounds have been studied for
their  cancer-causing  potential.  Be-
cause  of the typical  latency period of
15-40  years for cancer,  we  must as-
sume  that  much of the  cancer  from
recent industrial development is not
yet observable." Between 10 and  16
percent of the chemicals tested for
carcinogenicity produce cancer in ani-
mals,  but of some two million known
chemicals only about 6,000 have been
laboratory  tested for carcinogenicity.
 The  majority  of known  environmen-
tal carcinogens are encountered at the
workplace.  Above-normal incidences
of cancer are found in workers having
contact with known  or suspected car-
cinogenic substances such as asbestos,
arsenic, benzopyrene,  benzidine,  bis-
chloromethylether,  coal  tar, carbon
black, and  vinyl chloride.  Because
relatively  few detailed studies  of
worker populations have been  con-
ducted, evidence for  many  of these
substances  is only now  being devel-
oped.
 Cancer hazards may  be found in
some  consumer products.  Some chlor-
inated hydrocarbons and arsenical
pesticides  that  have been  used in
homes and  gardens are known carcin-
ogens. Commercially processed foods
have also been found  to contain resi-
dues of pesticides known to be carcin-
ogenic and  other chemicals suspected
of being so. Foods  may  also contain
naturally occurring  carcinogens  such
as aflatoxins produced by particular
moid  contaminants.  Some drugs and
cosmetics have been reported as car-
cinogenic.
 Combustion products released  from
industrial  and commercial smoke-
stacks may  contain a variety of carcin-
ogenic materials.  In 1975, the Envi-
ronmental  Protection Agency  found
cancer-producing agents  in low con-
centrations  in the drinking water of all
80 cities  whose  water supplies it  in-
vestigated.
 The  economic and social conse-
 quences of cancer in the United States
 are massive; it is estimated that annual
 expenditures for cancer go into tens of
 billions of dollars. Compared with the
 amounts  of human  and financial re-
 sources  invested in treatment, the in-
 vestment in cancer prevention has
 been small.  Yet, recent improvements
 in cancer  therapy  have been only
 modest. The  chapter concludes that
 the only prudent policy  toward cancer
 is to increase the emphasis on preven-
 tion and to  identify cancer risks  before
 human exposure. Of highest  priority  is
 the rigorous screening of chemicals for
 noxious properties  before they  reach
 the marketplace.
  In his  message transmitting the 1975
 report  to Congress, President  Ford
 states:
  "We  can  be  proud of the progress
 we have made  in improving the Na-
 tion's environmental  quality. Yet we
 must meet  additional challenges over
 the next few years. We must improve
 our  understanding of the effects of
 pollutants and of the  means  and costs
 of reducing pollution. As we develop
 new  energy sources and technologies,
 we  must assure  that they meet envi-
 ronmental  standards. We  also must
 continue the job of cleaning up  pollu-
 tion from existing sources."
  The 763-page  report provides  back-
 ground  on  environmental issues and
 analyses of  developments in air,
 water,  solid waste, noise,  land use,
 energy and related  fields. The good
- news is that despite continuing hard
 questioning of anti-pollution efforts
 and  their costs, spokesmen  for both
 industry and government are showing
 less inclination to dismiss environmen-
 tal concern as  a  faddist nuisance.
 Consideration  of environmental fac-
 tors  is becoming accepted  as a valid
 component  of private and public deci-
 sion  making.
   By most  conventional methods of
 measurement, air quality in  the  coun-
 try  has greatly improved during the
 five  years since passage of  the  Clean
 Air  Act  Amendments.  Sulfur dioxide
 has  been reduced  25 percent nation-
 wide and this  is particularly  evident in

-------
major metropolitan areas; participates,
the other  main pollutant from station-
ary sources,  were cut by 14 percent.
Of the  approximately  20,000 major
stationary sources,  15,600 have either
met the standards or have a schedule
for doing so.  Emissions from  1975
model automobiles have been reduced
67 percent  from emission  levels  of
cars built  five years  ago. Yet undesir-
ably high levels of the major air
pollutants continue  to occur at many
locations.
 Water  quality indicators, trend analy-
ses, and studies all show that many of
the worst point  sources  of pollution
are being effectively controlled  and
that some of our most heavily polluted
waterways are being cleaned up. By
July  1975 over 40,000 discharge  per-
mits had  been issued;  the  emphasis
was upon "major"  industrial and mu-
nicipal discharges. At the end of the
fiscal  year,  about $6.6  billion of mu-
nicipal  waste water treatment funds
had been obligated and one billion had
actually been spent.
 Other  highlights of the authoritative
report include:
   •CEQ economists estimate that the
cost  of  pollution  abatement  that  will
be required  in the  1974-1983 decade
by federal environmental legislation
will be $217.7 billion. This is up $22.9
billion from  the 1974 estimate, mostly
due to inflation. The per capita cost is
about $98 for  1976.  For the median
income  family, costs probably will rise
to about  2.5  percent of gross family
income  in 1983, before the ratio begins
to decline.
   • Estimated investment costs for air
pollution control  will reach  a peak in
1977 and those  for  water  pollution
control  in  1983.  The latter does  not
include  projected  costs to control  non-
point sources of pollution.
   • CEQ-EPA analyses indicate  that
the demands for  pollution control in-
vestments will not  seriously disrupt
capital  markets or displace  significant
amounts of investment  for  industry's
plans for  expansion  or modernization.
Pollution control expenditures are cur-
rently stimulating  the economy so that
the Gross  National Product is higher
than it otherwise would have been.
   • All  the analyses seem  to  indicate
that environmental programs had a net
effect of increasing  the number of
available jobs; air and water pollution
control  deadlines  and the municipal
grants program  have stimulated  ex-
penditures.
   • Demographic studies indicate that
the population growth  rate in larger
metropolitan  areas  has  dropped  sub-
stantially from what  it  was between
1960-70. In smaller metropolitan areas
it  increased slightly, but  in nonmetro-
politan  areas  the annual growth rate
has increased almost  a full one per-
cent.  The  shift  in  growth rates pre-
sumably reflects  a quality of life.
   •The environmental impact  of new
energy  technologies should  be  as-
sessed while they  are in the research
and development stage.  For example.
a  Stanford  Research Institute study
estimates  that  a  shale  oil industry
complex capable  of producing  6.4
quadrillion British  thermal  units  an-
nually by  the year 2000 might have
direct  environmental effects  of  the
following  magnitude:  solid  wastes
would be almost nine times the total
residential  and  commercial totals of
1973; a  daily water  requirement of 417
million  gallons, enough  to  supply  the
daily  household needs  the  Washing-
ton, D.C.  metropolitan area; sulfur
dioxide  emissions equal  to those from
thirteen  1,000-megawatt power plants
burning low-sulfur western coal with-
out any emission controls.
   • Nuclear power  production  has not
reached the  commercial significance
predicted. The industry  is troubled by
technical reliability and  safety  prob-
lems. Increasing costs  of generating
plants and  adjunct  fuel  facilities have
made the economics of nuclear power
doubtful. Controversy over a safe dis-
posal method for radioactive  wastes
remains unresolved.
   • Most lakes studied  in the  eastern
States  are  suffering some degree of
accelerated eutrophication, primarily
due to  nutrients that drain from agri-
cultural  and  urban land but affected
also by effluents  from industry and
sewage treatment plants.
  • Preliminary analysis of water qual-
ity data for 1970-74 shows a decline in
DDT levels  consistent with  the  re-
strictions on  domestic  use.  Levels  in
wildlife and human food supplies are
significantly  lowered;  soils show a
stabilization if not a decline of  DDT
levels.
  • Data for Great  Lakes fish  show
static or rising  levels of polychlori-
nated biphenyls  (PCBs).  Water sam-
ples from  the  North  Atlantic  show
PCB residues at least as high as those
of DDT, despite the much higher load
of DDT discharges; the indication  is
that PCBs are even more persistent  in
the ocean than long-lasting DDT.
  • Over-fishing  has seriously depleted
populations of some of the commercial
fish species off U.S. coasts.
  • Approximately  one out of  every
ten animal  species  native  to the
United States may be endangered  or
threatened; similarly, more  than one
out of ten of the higher plants may  be
endangered, threatened with becoming
endangered, or recently extinct.
  • In  the  developing  nations, where
nearly  three-fourths  of the world's
people live,  the  overriding environ-
mental  problem  is hunger. The  long-
run solution requires reduction of pop-
ulation  growth,  economic  develop-
ment, and  development aid  to raise
food production.
 The highlights cited  here  can only
suggest the scope and rich diversity  of
this report. It has  something for envi-
ronmentalists  of  all  persuasions.
Whether your specialty is the macro-
economics  of pollution control, flue
gas desulfurization, coastal zone plan-
ning, or the preservation of the black-
footed  ferret  and the blue whale, you
will find information of interest in this
almanac of the environment. The  re-
port may  be purchased from  the Su-
perintendent of  Documents,  U.S.
Government  Printing Office. Washing-
ton. D.C. 20402; stock #040-000-
00337-1. The price is $6.60. a
                                                                                                         PAGE 15

-------
9PLEPEOPLEPE01
                                         Frank H. Rainwater
Dr. Norman R. Glass
 Four men at the Corvallis Environ-
mental Research Laboratory have
been  named to new posts in the
reorganized laboratory by Dr. A. F.
Bartsch, Director:
 Dr. Norman R. Glass,  Director of
Ecological  Effects  Research, heads
the laboratory's research on the ef-
fects of environmental pollutants on
freshwater, marine, and terrestrial
ecosystems. Major groups under him
include the Marine and  Freshwater
Ecology Branch, including field sta-
tions  at Newport,  Ore.  and  Ely,
Minn.; the Terrestrial  Ecology
Branch; and Western Fish Toxicology
Station, both at Corvallis.
 Daniel K.  Krawczyk, Director of Lab-
oratory Analytical Support, directs a
staff responsible for chemical and bio-
logical analysis of environmental sam-
ples, operation and calibration of in-
struments,  automatic  data processing,
computer programming, technical in-
formation  services, and  the labora-
tory's library.
                             James ('. McCarty
 James C. McCarty,  Director of
Laboratory Operations and Support.
is responsible  for laboratory adminis-
tration: program planning and coordi-
nation, financial management, pur-
chasing, personnel services, security,
safety, and facilities management.
 Frank H. Rainwater, Director of As-
sessment  and  Criteria Development,
directs research on the effects of for-
estry on stream life, and on statistical
analysis and mathematical prediction
of pollutant impacts. Major research
groups under him include the Criteria
and Assessment Branch, Ecosystems
Modeling and  Analysis Branch, Spe-
cial Studies Branch, and the  Alaska
Field Station at College, Alaska.
                           Administrator Train and King Carl Gustaf
 His Majesty Carl Gustaf XVI, King of
Sweden,  visited EPA Headquarters
last month to confer with Administra-
tor Russell  E. Train and other top
EPA officials.
 The King had requested the meeting
so that he could discuss environmental
programs in the United States and
Sweden. The Swedish King has long
been interested in environmental pro-
tection and nature conservation.
 Mr. Train first met the King at the
1972 United Nations Conference on
the Human Environment in Stock-
holm.

 Michael D. Muse, Environmental
Protection Specialist in Region IX.
San Francisco, recently received a
commendation  from President  Ford
for his "efforts to reduce the cost of
government and conserve resources."
 Mr. Muse  saved EPA an estimated
$8.000 last year by adapting an exist-
ing air program computer system to
serve as an  information and retrieval
file for approximately 2,400 wastewa-
ter discharge permits in the Region.
 For his "initiative, resourcefulness,
and foresight" in automating the Re-
gion's discharge permit record keep-
ing, Mr. Muse was given an  EPA
special achievement award of $450.
 PAGE 16

-------
                                                          Steven Reznek
Carol M. Thomas and Linda Smith
Richard J. Dennev Jr.
                                                         Jerome H. Svore
     Robert SchafTer
 Carol M. Thomas, Director.  Office
of Civil  Rights,  recently  presented
Linda  Smith,  Technical  Publications
Coordinator.  Office of Research  and
Development,  with a certificate  recog-
nizing  her outstanding service as  a
supervisor of  trainees in EPA's  Up-
ward Mobility  Program.
 Certificates  were also  awarded to
Margaret Stasikowski,  Cincinnati,
Ohio;  Robert Poss, Seattle. Wash.;
and Sheldon Brandt, Las  Vegas, Nev.
 The supervisors worked with trainees
in  EPA's ACCENT program (Aid to
Careers  of Competent Employees in
Need of  Training).

 Steven  Reznek has been  appointed
Associate Deputy  Assistant Adminis-
trator for Energy,  Minerals,  and In-
dustry  in the  Office of Research  and
Development.  He  reports to  Stephen
J.  Gage.
 For the last  two  years. Dr. Reznek
has been Director of Program Coordi-
nation  and Regional Studies for the
National  Commission on  Water Qual-
ity.
 He was granted  a B.S.  in physics
from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology in 1963 and earned his
doctorate there in  1967. He then held
successive research posts at MIT, the
Technical  University  of  Denmark,
and  the  University of  Bristol, Eng-
land.
  From  1971  to  1973  he served as a
physicist in  EPA's Office of  Water
Programs and Office of Research and
Development. In the  1973-74 aca-
demic  year he was a researcher and
lecturer at   Princeton  University's
Center for Environmental Studies.
  Dr.  Reznek is married, the father of
one child, and lives in  Bethesda, Md.

 Richard J.  Denney Jr. has been ap-
pointed Associate General Counsel
for the Pesticide Division by  General
Counsel Robert V. Zener.
 Mr.  Denney.  36. joined EPA  in
March 1971   and  had  been Assistant
General  Counsel  in the  Air  Quality.
Noise, and Radiation  Division.
 He is a graduate of Stanford Univer-
sity with a bachelor of science degree
in physics, and he earned a doctorate
in law at Harvard Law School. He
has  practiced  law  in  San  Francisco,
Calif., and Washington.  D.C.  For two
years he was  Assistant  General  Coun-
sel to  the East  African  Community,
Nairobi, Kenya.
 He is married to the former  Rebecca
Brown  of Worcester,  Mass.  They
have two children and live in Chevy
Chase. Md.
 hPA's Region  VII  recently won the
Government  Professional  Develop-
ment  Award of  the  Missouri Society
of Professional  Engineers.  Regional
Administrator Jerome H. Svore ac-
cepted the award at the Society's 26th
annual meeting  in  Kansas  City, on
behalf of the  Agency, which  was cited
for its outstanding  contribution  to the
advancement and improvement  of the
engineering profession in  1975.  It was
the third  time  Region VII has re-
ceived the award. About 30 percent of
the Agency's permanent regional staff
members are engineers, a majority of
whom have advanced degrees.

 Robert Schaffer has  been named As-
sociate Deputy Assistant  Administra-
tor  for  Air.  Land, and  Water  Use,
Office of Research and Development.
reporting to Thomas A. Murphy.
 Mr.  Schaffer had  been  Director of
Permit Assistance and Evaluation. Of-
fice of Enforcement, for  two  years,
and had  previously  served in several
water pollution control posts in EPA
and its predecessor agencies.
 He is a  graduate of Hartwick Col-
lege, Oneonta. N.Y.. in 1956 and has
worked with the N.Y. State Depart-
ment  of Health; the Public Health
Service.  Cincinnati,  Ohio;  and with
Dow  Chemical Company.
                                                                                                       PAGE

-------
REGION   V
  Mid America's rich and diverse envi-
ronment continues to make strong and
steady improvement on the  road back
to clean air and clean water.
  While some pockets  of resistance to
pollution cleanup remain in this six-
state Region, dischargers generally are
trying to  reduce their wastes.
  EPA's  Mid-America region—Region
V—consists of Illinois, Indiana, Mich-
igan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Within its  boundaries  reside 20 per-
cent of America's population,  25 per-
cent of its  manufacturing activity and
diverse land-use forms—urban-indus-
trial, farm and  recreation—to name
the broadest uses. Also in this Region
are four of the five Great Lakes.
  The massive size and diversity  of
this  Region and the  resulting complex-
ity of its pollution  problems will con-
tinue to  require a strategy based on
cooperative partnership roles between
Federal and State environmental pro-
tection agencies,  as mandated in all
Federal environmental statutes.
  The strong cooperative  efforts  be-
tween these agencies, apparent in the
Construction  Grants  Program, were
extended in a  significant way during
FY 75 in takeovers  by Indiana, Mich-
igan. Minnesota, Ohio and  Wisconsin
of the National Pollutant  Discharge
Elimination System, the water permit
program.
  As  of this  date,  these five States
have permanent  authority to issue
permits,  do compliance tracking and
enforce all  permits within their States,
excluding Federal  facilities. Through
Federal-State cooperative  efforts,
some  10,(XX) permits—approximately
12(X)  for major dischargers and  7800
for minor dischargers—have been is-
sued  over  the past two-year  period.
Followup visits to each of the 1,200
major dischargers are expected to be
completed this year'.


       Major Bottleneck

  The  major  bottleneck continuing to
plague this program is the  reluctance
of a number of major steel and electric
power producers to agree to permits.
PAGE 18
The result has been a  lengthy process
of adjudicatory hearings.  Additional
requests for such  hearings are ex-
pected in the coming  months.  So far
375 industrial and municipal  discharg-
ers have requested these  formal ad-
ministrative  reviews to challenge per-
mits issued.  Region V  faces  special
problems in  Ohio with permit issuance
because of the steel industry. Ninety-
five major  peimits  remain contested.
This number constitutes two-thirds  of
all major permits not yet issued in the
Region.
  While  extensive monitoring of Great
Lakes water quality is only  now get-
ting under way by  Region V's surveil-
lance  vessel, significant improvement
has been found in many of the feeders
to the  Lakes. Swimming is coming
back  as a recreational activity in the
Twin  Cities  stretch of the Mississippi,
new wastewater facilities like those
installed recently by Jones & Laughlin
are improving the  Cuyahoga. and the
return of fish to  Michigan's big indus-
trial rivers—the  Kalamazoo. the De-
troit,  and  the Rouge—have prompted
widespread national media attention in
the Region.
  Due to extensive investment  in mu-
nicipal  treatment  control  facilities,
phosphorus  reduction  in the  Lake
Michigan  basin is  expected  to reach
the goal of  1  part  per million on
schedule.
 The  International Joint Commission,
meeting  in  Windsor,  Ontario, last
summer,was told about a two-year
study of Lake  Michigan  that will
complete the first cycle  of intensive
surveys on all the Great Lakes under-
taken by Region  V in  cooperation
with Canadian authorities and  Region
II  as  part of the Canadian-American
agreement of  1971.  This study will
evaluate  changes in the  Lake's water
quality since the  1%0's,  and  provide
ihe basis for future cleanup programs.
After  the Lake  Michigan study, this
program  will continue  with  one-year
studies of each of the other lakes on a
five-year cycle.
 Region  V has a total  of $2.9 billion
dollars committed to  building  and im-
proving  sewage treatment systems  in
the six-state area  through 1977  (that
figure is currently under Congressional
debate). Massive plants  are now under
construction in Cleveland and  Detroit.
Facilities like  the new $72-million
Green Bay  industrial-municipal  plant
have already gone on line in  the past
year, and innovative programs like the
deep  tunnel  project in  Chicago for
storing storm water, are under way.


         National Goal

 At this  time, four of the states in the
Region—Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin
and Minnesota—say they are  confi-
dent that all waters within their juris-
dictions  will  meet the  1983  national
goal  of swim triable  and  fishable
waters.
 As a result of the  massive  amounts
of  construction grants  made  to  cities
throughout  the  Region, thousands  of
 Cleveland skvlinc ;tnd Lake Erie.

-------
Wahash  Street  Bridge,  one  of the draw
bridges over  the Chicago River.


new construction and related jobs are
being created.
  Important  new  legislation providing
tor increased protection of  public
drinking  water supplies was  assigned
to  the  Agency  as  a result of  the
passage of the Drinking Water Supply
Act of 1974. In Region V. the number
of sources classified as drinking water
sources subject  to the provisions  of
the Act will  increase from  70(K)  to
almost 80,000. The new Act applies to
any place serving 25 or more persons
per day or having 15 service connec-
tions.
  A special study of the drinking water
of 83 cities  in the Region was con-
ducted  through  Region  V's Central
Regional Laboratory during the  spring
of  1975.  It  supplemented a  similar
study of 81  cities across the  U.S. by
EPA  to measure minute concentra-
tions  of  organic compounds  believed
to have a carcinogenic potentiality.
  The Federal-State program to achieve
National Ambient Air Quality  Stand-
ards  will undergo a major  shift  in
direction during FY  76.  Past  efforts
were  spent  on  identifying polluting
sources  and areas where standards
were  not expected to be attained and
carrying  out enforcement  actions
against  major  sources. A major con-
frontation between  the  Region  and
U.S.  Steel  over the long promised
shutdown of an  open hearth  in Gary
took place as Region V backed  up the
Indiana Pollution Control Board's re-
fusal  to grant  an  additional extension.
The open hearth was closed on  De-
cember  31,  1974, when  U.S. Steel
refused  a court  compromise.  U.S.
Steel  also closed  three coke ovens at
its Gary works in December of 1975
after a lengthy enforcement action.
 The main thrust of the  air program
during the coming months  will  be  the
re-evaluation  of State Implementation
Programs,  specifically for total sus-
pended pailiculates and sulfur dioxide.
and a  new enforcement push for sta-
tionary source compliance in 50  non -
attainment  areas  identified within  the
Region.  Financial assistance  to State
and local air  pollution agencies  during
FY 76 will total almost S10 million.
 The major bottleneck in the air pro-
gram  has been in the  State of Ohio.
where industries and power  plants
using  high-sulfur coal  successfully
challenged  State  and  Federal  sulfur
dioxide requirements. This has  forced
EPA to develop  its  own  regulations
for Ohio and has  slowed  enforcement.


       Violation Notices

 During the  past fiscal  year,  EPA
issued 68 notices of violation  to  air
violators. 21  Administrative Orders
and  one case. Wabash  Smelting of
Wabash, Ind., was  brought to the
U.S. Attorney and led to a no-contest
criminal  conviction  for air pollution
violations.
 A persistent problem has been bring-
ing into compliance three metropolitan
areas  where auto-related  pollutants
have required additional transportation
control strategies. Cities involved at
present include Chicago,  Indianapolis
and Cincinnati. Mandatory auto emis-
sion  inspection has been established in
Cincinnati.  Federal  enforcement  or-
ders have been issued to the Chicago
metropolitan  area to increase  inspec-
tions,  and  vapor  recovery from gas
pumping facilities has been started in
Indianapolis, which may yet  need
mandatory auto emission  inspection.
 Air  pollution controls in  the  Region
to date have  significantly improved air
quality in Chicago,  Detroit and Min-
neapolis-St.  Paul.
                  In Chicago,  the maximum  annual
                 level for sulfur dioxide and total sus-
                 pended  solids went from 92  to  81
                 micrograms per cubic meter and from
                 163 to 161  micrograms. respectively. In
                 Detroit,  sulfur dioxide  dropped  from
                 82  to 74. and in Minneapolis-St.  Paul,
                 the TSP level  decreased  from 102 to
                 94.
                  The  Federal-State  environmental  ef-
                 fort in Region V.  in the future, as the
                 mistakes of the past are corrected, will
                 need to plan  for wiser  use of re-
                 sources.
                  One of the principle vehicles for this
                 type of planning is  the Areawide
                 Waste Management  planning now get-
                 ting under way  in earnest throughout
                 all  of the country. Under  Sec. 208 of
                 the  1972 Water Pollution  Control Act
                 Amendments, over S37 million  in
                 funds has  been awarded to Region V
                 agencies designated by the Governors
                 of  each  state to  take  a total look at
                 pollution problems through 1983 and,
                 more  importantly,  come up with  a
                 management plan for dealing  with
                 these problems.
                  This  program will  have  its  greatest
                 impact in the urban industrialized cen-
                 ters, and will affect well over half the
                 population in the Region.
                  The success of this program—which
                 is  very  closely related to land use
                 management—will in  great  measure
                 depend on local  participation and  it
                 will form the backdrop  for future
                 construction grants  decision.  Also, it
                 will for the first  time  establish base-
                 line data  on the  quantity  and  quality
                 of nonpoint discharges.
                  Similar planning  under the Air Qual-
                 ity   Maintenance   Areas program will
                 also have  similar land use  manage-
                 ment implications.
                  I^ack of concern  for the future  \vas a
                 root cause of the  environmental crisis
                 in  Region  V.  Rational  planning for
                 tomorrow's environment will allow for
                 a better way of life  for all the people
                 of this Region, o
Smelt nets hanging from
in background.
~ake  Michigan seawall in Chicago.
High rise apartments
                                                                                                          PAGE 19

-------
 Hunting  the  Great  Midwestern   Myth
                                                                               By Frank Corrado*
 The  problem  is really quite simple,
you see. I'm just overly  insecure  in
situations like this.
 "How can you stand living in the
Midwest," he opens.
 "Oh, it's okay, if you can take the
weather," I mumble.
 "What do you do for entertain-
ment," he continues,  enjoying his
easy victory.
 No response.
 "1 mean, we've got  the mountains
out West, and  Denver and San  Fran-
cisco.  And back East, there's New
York  . . . and  Boston and Philly .  . .
with so much to do.
 The  mumbling starts again:  "Oh,
there's lots to do in the Midwest,"  I
say, and bury  my head in a copy  of
the /Vcir Yorker.
 He smiles the kind of smile you
would expect and then  goes back  to
staring at the  nifty  little  stewardess
from Petosky,  Michigan, who's serv-
ing drinks.
 How else do  you answer these peo-
ple with horn rim glasses, glen plaid
suits and  wing-tip shoes who look
down at the Midwest from 30,(XX) feet
whether they're airborne or not?
 I mean, like  I have  these  secret
dreams, you know, where  I've lost 20
pounds, grown  a new  head of light
brown hair and generally look like an
"old boy" from out East or a Brooks
Brothers cowboy from Denver.
 Then, in these dreams, I  just happen
to  sit next to one of these dudes, my
lines well  rehearsed, my Chicago-
"A" toned down and then I let them
have it, in  of course, a very erudite
fashion about how great the  Midwest
really is. 1 mean, it really is.
 Start  with  Illinois.  As the  natives
say, "There's  Chicago and  then
there's the rest of the  State."  How
true. As columnist Mike Royko once
noted,  anyone  south of lilth  St.  in
Chicago has a  southern twang in his
voice.   If you look at the  geography,
Illinois is almost totally a  rural  state.
Pioneers hesitated settling  on its prai-
ries originally, thinking a lack of trees
indicated poor soil.  Some of Amer-
ica's great rivers—the Mississippi, the
Ohio and the Wabash, cut its  outline.
And of course, the license plates
proudly read  "Land of Lincoln"  al-
though some Kentuckians  and  Hoos-
iers take issue. Chicago is truly the
PAGE 20
gem of the Region with its magnificent
lakefront, its superb restaurants and
shops, and of course. Mayor Daley.
The industrial base in this city  is
second  to none, which has caused
many people to say that "if you can't
get a job in  Chicago, you can't  get
one at all."  Farther south, the State
ranks number one in soybean produc-
tion and  number two in corn. And an
incredible amount of coal lies under all
this.
  The upper  northwest corner of Indi-
ana next to Chicago has one of  the
greatest steel-making complexes in the
world, but. as you go south, the farms
 Chicago's  John  Hancock Building with
 sailboats in foreground.

take over again, growing  corn and
hogs, not to mention the sweet-smell-
ing  fields  of spearmint used by Mr.
Wrigley. During World War II.  many
Indiana fields were planted with  hemp
as a national security measure,  creat-
ing  a temptation that  young people
and county sheriffs find irresistible
these days.  Farther south, Indiana
becomes hilly and you come upon the
nation's biggest limestone  quarries,
which I  think, are mainly in business
to help build war memorials for Indi-
anapolis,  which, sports humorist Jim
Murray once noted, had to  be at least
I "Frank  Corrudo  is Director at Public
\Affairs, EPA Rc.t>ion \ .
one war ahead of the Pentagon. Indi-
anapolis  is also home of the Z&Z
"brickyard"  famous for its annual
Memorial  Day Madness. As a matter
of fact some very high priced  condo-
miniums have  been  built overlooking
that track. Status. Nearby Columbus,
Indiana, thanks to the Cummins En-
gine Company people, has some of the
most  spectacular  architecture  in
America  and farther south, in New
Harmony, restoration of its famous
early  commune is under way.  Open
favorites  in  this area are  Nashville
known for its sassafras tea and Hoos-
ier humor and  Parke  County which
could  give Vermont a good run on the
number of old  covered  bridges still
around.
 Just  north of Indiana is  Michigan—
the  Great Lakes State. People tend to
forget occasionally  that  Michigan
really  gives the appearance  of being
two States, with its upper Peninsula
sitting atop northern Wisconsin. Mich-
igan borders  four of the  five Great
Lakes and has  a  very big tourist
industry. Lumber cutting was the orig-
inal lure that brought people here, and
carriage builders later turned to build-
ing  Chevy's,  Fords and Plymouths.
Michigan is the blueberry-growing capi-
tal of the world, but is also known for its
cherries,  apples.and peaches.  Pres-
ently,  Detroit  is stalling a building ren-
aissance,  and  there's  new optimism
rampant now that fish are returning to
the  Detroit and Rouge rivers.
 While Michigan claims to have more
inland lakes than Minnesota,  there  is
no doubt among Minnesotans as to
where the good  life  is.  Mary Tyler
Moore doesn't live  there for nothing.
Minneapolis, the San Francisco of the
Midwest, has to really be  experi-
enced. Its  Nicollet  Street  Mall and
sophisticated stores top anybody's list.
And  Minnesota has a solid  cultural
heritage as well, having turned out
Sinclair  Lewis. F.  Scott Fitzgerald
(who drank at the Commodore Hotel
in St.  Paul), Bobby  Dylan, who was
raised  in  Hibbing, Minn.,not to men-
tion football's Bronco Nagurski, who
holds  court at his  Amoco  service
station in  International Falls (Elaine's,
it is not). Minnesota is aJso the home
of the  Mesabi iron  range, the major
ore supply for the steel mills of Gary
and Cleveland.  Reserve Mining is

-------
here as well. Up around  Bemidji, the
Mississippi River starts its trip south.
Famous  products  from the  State in-
clude Gino's  Pizza, Chung King,  Pop-
pin'  Fresh rolls. Cheerios and Scotch
Tape.
 Wisconsin,   Minnesota's  eastern
neighbor,  produces  41  per cent  of
America's  cheese  (that's  no  baloney)
and  most of the great  fishing lies told
hereabouts. Formed by the great  Wis-
consin glacier,  the State  "unfolds in
timber-crowned ridges,  hillside  pas-
tures and valley hayfields" to quote a
lurid National Geographic description.
Wisconsin also has  two famous ci-
ties— Milwaukee,  which dispenses
gusto by the  barrel,  and has  a zoo
good enough  to  make  the  Disney
people jealous; and of course  Green
       Bay, home of a  small  religious  sect
       which confines its worship to autumn
       Sunday afternoons and whose children
       are  named  after  Saints  Vincent, Bart
       and Paul.  Green  Bay also reportedly
       has a city ordinance against squeezing
       certain  household paper products
       which are manufactured there.
        Finally, there's  Ohio, home of eight
       U.S. presidents (bet you  can't name
       them all). In Akron reside the people
       who own the blimp and the other guys
       (who don't  want to be confused with
       the blimp  people).  Cleveland  has
       given  us Thomas  Edison and Bob
       Hope  (but  Dean Martin is from Steu-
       benville. I'm forever being reminded).
       Through  the flats of Cleveland the
       Cuyahoga  river flows. No further ex-
       planation here.
                    The famous  southern  Ohio town.
                  Cincinnati,  is close enough to Ken-
                  tucky to be considered a bit southern
                  (right across  the Ohio river) but  it
                  isn't. Cincinnati is  truly one  of the
                  best Midwestern cities,  with a lively
                  downtown, a hilltop  district called  Mt.
                  Adams  where Johnny Bench  resides.
                  polishing  World Series  memorabilia.
                  Cincinnati  also hosts several EPA
                  laboratories. The Delta Queen, a mar-
                  velous remnant  of leisure and  luxury
                  and  last of the great river boats, sails
                  forth from this port city.
                    Well, do I  really need to worry about
                  this  fellow from out of town,  looking
                  down his nose  at the  Midwest?  No.
                  As a matter of fact.  1 feel so sorry for
                  him, I think I'll  buy  him a drink, a
    Thomas E. Yeates
    Director, Management Division
Robert J. Schneider
Great Lakes Coordinator
Christopher M. Timm, Director,    James O. McDonald. Director,
Surveillance and Analysis Division   Enforcement Division
    Henry Longest
    Director, Water Division
        George K. Alexander, Jr. Regional Administrator
                             Valdas V. Adamkus
                             Deputy Regional Administrator
        REGION    V's     LEADERSHIP    TEAM
    U-e Bolts
    Assistant for Congressional
    and Intergovernmental Relations
Roland L. Cornelius
Director, Office of Civil Rights
and Urban Affairs
Krunk Corrado
Director, Office of Public
Information
Clifford Rislev, Jr. Director,
Office of Research and
Development
                                                                                                          PAGE 21

-------
controls  reinstated
Three elements of EPA's transporta-
tion control plans for the Boston area
have been reinstated by the U.S. Dis-
trict Court of Appeals. They include a
freeze on commercial parking spaces,
vapor recovery systems for gasoline
stations, and incentives TO reduce sin-
gle-passenger auto commuting.
These aspects of the plans had  been
suspended since September 1974 pend-
ing resolution of legal actions challeng-
ing EPA's authority and the technical
data on which the pians were based.
Gasoline station operators have until
June 1 to install the vapor recovery
systems.


treatment plant awards
Region i's Water Programs  Division
has started a program to encourage and
recognize the good operation and main-
tenance of sewage treatment plants.
Every month certificates will be
awarded to the two officials in charge
of plants judged to be operated  effi-
ciently and  maintained in superior con-
dition.  The  awards. !o be  presented at
local community ceremonies, empha-
size the importance of proper sewage
treatment to the improvement of water-
way quality.
sludge dumping
New York  City's sewage plant sludge
can continue to be dumped at  sea for
the next five years without danger to

PAGE 22
public health or beach water quality,
according to a draft environmental im-
pact statement filed recently by EPA.
The Agency had been considering pro-
posals to move the dump site, an area
roughly  22 kilometers (12 nautical
miles) off the Long Island and New
Jersey coasts, or to open new dump
sites.
However, Regional Administrator Ger-
ald M. Hansler said the present site
would be adequate until  1981, since the
amounts of sludge to  be disposed of
have not increased as rapidly as ex-
pected because  of delays in starting
advanced treatment plants. The state-
ment recommends continued monitor-
ing of the dumping site and designation
of an alternate site if that becomes
necessary.
Land-based alternatives to ocean
dumping are being considered by the
interstate Sanitation Commission, Mr.
Hansler said. These include incinera-
tion, pyrolysis (heat treatment), and
land application of the sludge. EPA's
goal is to end all sludge dumping in the
New York Bight by 1981.


minority firms hired
Three minority certified public account-
ing firms in New York City have been
awarded contracts to  do accounting
work for the Region 11 Office, and a
contract is under negotiation with a
fourth firm in Puerto  Rico. The firms
will supplement the Office's auditing
staff. Each contract's value may range
from about $6,000 to  $114,000.
sewer moratorium
A ban on additional sewer connections
in a Philadelphia suburb was recently
imposed by Region III. Officials of
Region III believe it was the first such
action by  EPA, although sewer morato-
riums have been frequently ordered by
State agencies.
The action prohibits new connections
to the  Saw Mill Run pumping station,
near Norristown, Pa., and will remain
in effect until the station's capacity is
enlarged. The East Norriton-Plymouth
Joint Sewer Authority is planning the
enlargement, with  Construction Grant
funding from EPA.
During heavy rains, the undersized
                                                                             pumping station now permits raw sew-
                                                                             age to overflow into a  tributary of the
                                                                             Schuylkill  River, which is the source of
                                                                             several drinking water systems.


                                                                             pesticide fines
                                                                             More than $8,000 in fines was paid
                                                                             recently by four manufacturers for vio-
                                                                             lations of the  Federal pesticides law.
                                                                             The violators  and their fines were:
                                                                             Lebanon Chemical Corp., Lebanon,
                                                                             Pa., $2,700; Bowman Mell and  Co.,
                                                                             Harrisburg, Pa., $500; Arcal  Chemi-
                                                                             cals, Seat Pleasant,  Md., $3,000; and
                                                                             Monsey Products Co., Kimberton,  Pa.,
                                                                             $2,200.
record penalty
The largest settlement yet received in
Region IV for pesticide registration
violations was the recent $15,000 pen-
alty paid by the Kare Chemical Co., a
subsidiary of the Eagle Family Dis-
count Store, Opa-Locka, Fla.
The firm was charged with six counts
of non-registration and six misbranding
violations. Six different products were
involved, including swimming pool dis-
infectant, lawn spray, algicide, and in-
secticides.
air  violators cited
Region V Enforcement Director James
O. McDonald recently issued formal
notices of violation of federally enforce-
able State air pollution regulations to
large companies in Ohio and Indiana.
The Cleveland Electric and Illuminat-
ing Co. was cited for excessive  panicu-
late  emissions at power plants in Ash-
tabula, Avon Lake, Willoughby, and
Cleveland. Sixteen boilers at these
plants, the notice said, were emitting
particulates at the rate of 28,000 tons
per year; State regulations allow only
7,100 tons per year.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation's two
coke batteries at Chesterton, Ind.,

-------
were charged with emitting 2,215 tons
per year of participates, more than four
times the 506-tons-per-year rate allowed
by Indiana regulations.
hispanic convention
Many Region VI employees will take
part in the annual convention of IM-
AGE, an organization of Spanish-
speaking government employees in
Dallas  May 26-30. The IMAGE Gov-
ernment Employees' Association is
composed of Hispanic persons em-
ployed at all levels of Federal, State,
and local governments throughout the
country, but especially in the South-
west. More than 7,000 delegates and
visitors are expected. EPA  will have an
exhibit at the convention, explaining
the Agency's programs and activities.
Carlos Romero, Region  VI Civil
Rights Officer,  is EPA's coordinator
for the convention.


wrecker convicted
The first criminal conviction for failing
to control asbestos dust in building
demolition has been obtained in U.S.
District Court in New Orleans.
The Big Chief Wrecking Co., Fort
Lauderdale, Fla., and its foreman. Jack
Deutsch, were found guilty  of ignoring
EPA rules for dust control when
company workers demolished the old
Hotel Dieu Hospital in New Orelans in
1974. The rules, issued the year before,
require wreckers to wet down
asbestos-containing materials and
remove them in dust-tight containers
before the general destruction of a
building. Inhalation of asbesos fibers is
linked to bronchial and lung cancer.
kansas fish  kills
Aerial applications of pesticides are
suspected of being the cause of exten-
sive fish kills in ponds and streams of
south central Kansas in March. Sam-
ples of living and dead fish, bottom
muds, and water collected  by the State
Fish and Game Commission were ana-
lyzed in EPA's Kansas City, Mo.,
Surveillance and Analysis Laboratory
and found to contain endrin and para-
thion.
The pesticide spraying began in late
February to control an army cutworm
outbreak that threatened the wheat
crop. Larry Anderson and  C.E. Poin-
dexterof the  Region VII Pesticides
Branch headed EPA's investigation to
determine if there were any violations
of Federal law. They worked in coop-
eration with the Federal Aviation Ad-
ministration, the State Department of
Agriculture, and the State  Department
of Water Quality and Hygiene.
penalties  sought

Region VIII is seeking civil penalties
totalling $300,000 in four pending Fed-
eral  District Court cases.
In Utah EPA is  asking for a $140.000
judgment against Park City Ventures,
for 14 days of tailings spills from the
firm's mining operations in Park City,
and $10,000 from Thatcher Chemical
Co., Salt Lake City, for a chemical
discharge into the Surplus Canal, a
tributary of Great Salt Lake.
In Colorado the  Ralston Purina Co.,
owner of the Keystone ski area, is
charged with spilling oil into Dillon
Reservoir for 11  days, and a fine of
$110,000 is sought. For endangering the
water supply of Crested Butte by tail-
ings spills into Coal Creek, the U.S.
Energy Corporation, a mining com-
pany, is being sued for $40,000.


drinking water grants
Three States in Region VI11 have been
awarded the first drinking water supply
supervision grants, under the Safe
Drinking Water Act. They are: Colo-
rado. $107,600; North  Dakota, $75.000;
and South Dakota, $75.000.
The funds will be used for technical
assistance, engineering surveillance,
monitoring, and laboratory support.
steel plant cleanup
The Kaiser Steel Corporation recently
agreed to clean up the air pollution
from its Fontana, Calif., plant after
EPA asked for a Federal District
Court injunction against the firm.
The corporation signed a consent de-
cree, agreeing to reduce its emissions
of sulfur oxides and paniculate matter
to acceptable levels. Installation of
"scrubbers," gas cleaning equipment.
began immediately on  some stacks, and
the first units will be in operation this
summer. Kaiser also agreed to shut
down all but three of its antiquated
open hearth furnaces, and to use no
more than two of them at any one
time. The decree requires full compli-
ance with EPA's emission order by
Jan. I. 1980.
foot rot fungus
Winter wheat growers in eastern Ore-
gon recently received special permis-
sion from EPA to use an unregistered
fungicide, Benlate, on some 261,000
acres of crops. The product is the only
one known  to be effective on wheat
foot rot, a fungus infection that threat-
ened the growers with a loss of more
than $4 million this season. Later a
similar authorization was made for east-
ern Washington.


municipal  penalty
The Eagle Water and Sewer District in
Ada County, Idaho, near Boise, re-
cently paid  a $250 civil penalty for
violation of its wastewater discharge
permit.  Region  X officials believed it is
the first such penalty to be paid by a
municipality or municipal service cor-
poration.
                                                                                                         PAGE 23

-------
                            WILL  ENVIRONMENTAL
                         E4CTCCS  INELLENCE
                      CHOICE  CE \ WvlTICN  SITE?
Kenneth  Eng,  Environmental  Engi-
neer,  Facilities Technology  Division,
Region II, New York:
 "To a large  degree, environmental
factors will affect my choice of a
vacation place.  But the eventual selec-
tion will depend upon  the purpose of
the vacation. If I  wanted to go sight-
seeing or  swimming, a polluted  site
would obviously not be chosen.
 "However, if studying the culture
and  mores of a  certain  society or
people were my primary interest, then
only the worst  environmental hazards
would  deter me from  a  visit. More-
over,  by visiting an area where pollu-
tion  is rampant,   I might  be able to
recommend or assist  the  people to
handle some of their pollution prob-
lems.
 "This summer my wife and I plan to
visit  Hong  Kong to see what it is  like
now.  1 was last there as a  very small
child some twenty  years ago."

Dick Thiel, Chief,  Environmental  Im-
pacts  Branch. Water  Division  Region
X, Seattle.  Wash.:
 "With a wife, four children and a
dog to take along, 1 choose vacation
spots  on  a  socio-economic  and politi-
cal basis rather than on environmental
grounds.  However,  whenever possi-
ble,  I look for unspoiled natural sur-
roundings which  show as little evi-
dence of man's influence as there  can
be. The  wonders  of God's creation
are best experienced away from noise.
congestion, and the hyper-active pace
of everyday life.
 "My choices are the ocean shore,
and the quiet mountain lakes."
        George Coblyn,  Director of Civil
        Rights and Urban  Affairs, Region I,
        Boston:
          "Yes, environmental factors have in-
        fluenced my  choice of where to use
        vacation time. Usually,  my wife and I
        travel overseas but this year I am
        staying put. The environment created
        by urban  neglect will keep me in the
        inner city of Boston and its blighted
        environs.
          "I will be  working with the Third
        World Organization, a movement that
        represents people of color,  blacks,
        chicanos,    Indians,   Portuguese,
        Chinese,  Puerto  Ricans  and all the
        rest.  Headquarters  are in the newly
        built  Harriet  Tubman  House on Tre-
        mont Street and I will be  interviewing
        and recruiting members of minorities
        for construction work  under EPA's
        federally sponsored construction grant
        projects.
          "I think that our Agency hasn't
        taken a close and  hard enough look at
        the problems of  the  Nation's inner
        cities and their endangered species—
        man. These people live in an environ-
        ment  of  deprivation—deprived not
        only of the esthetics and pleasantries
        of life, but even of health itself.
          "Perhaps we  have been too elitist.
        with our concern  centered upon open
        land,  the  amenities of nature,  and
        recreational areas that  attract the af-
        luent and Sierra Club members. Cer-
        tainly, many  of EPA's  supporters are
        the same  people who move to  small
        towns in Massachusetts and Connecti-
        cut, where in the name of preservation
        they  practice  economic exclusion
        against minorities and the poor.
                           "Were I not  staying in  Boston this
                          year,  probably  we would go to the
                          new nation  of  Guinea,  to visit the
                          place my father  was born when it was
                          a colony—Dutch Guinea."

                          Garland  Gates,  Supply Management
                          Specialist, General Services Division.
                          Research Triangle Park, N.C.:
                           "Environmental factors influence my
                          choice  of a vacation  site to the extent
                          that I won't go to a beach  that has the
                          reputation of being a dirty beach or to
                          an area that  has a reputation  for dirty
                          air. But usually  I go where my family
                          wants  to go and to  a place  that  fits
                          into  my  budget. I pian to go South
                          this year, to Mississippi where I have
                          family  living."

                          Birute Bulota,  Illustrator, Graphics
                          Art Section, Region V, Chicago:
                            "The choice  of where  to go and
                          what to do on  vacations  is definitely
                          influenced by environmental consider-
                          ations—primarily the presence  of
                          breathable air and clean water. Some
                          years,  in February or  March, I go to
                          the Rocky Mountain  area for skiing
                          where  the air is  clear and clean.  I  do
                          go sailing on Lake Michigan, but not
                          swimming because I  like cleaner water
                          to swim  in.  In  summer I've  sailed to
                          Mackinac and  fished  on  the islands
                          nearby—the water at least appears to
                          be clean  up there. I've driven through
                          the continental United  States and
                          parts of the country  are still beautiful,
                          but many of the urban areas seem like
                          waste lands. I have to work in a city,
                          but  I  usually  flee  from cities  for
                          holidays."
      Kenneth Kng
Dick Thiel
George  Coblyn
Garland Gates
Birute Bulota
PAGE 24

-------
                                "briefs
RETENTION OF WATER CLEANUP DEADLINES URGED BY QUARLES
Proposals by the National Commission on Water Quality that Congress
postpone the water cleanup deadlines set in the Water Pollution
Control Act have been described as "inconsistent,  undesirable  and
hopelessly impractical" by Deputy Administrator John R.  Quarles  Jr.
A general delay in the 1977 date for requiring the best  practicable
pollution control methods for industries and cities "would be
tantamount to rewarding" polluters who have delayed in complying,
he declared.  Mr. Quarles also said that-there is  no need  for  a
five-or ten-year postponement of the goal of "fishable,  swimmable"
water by 1983, as proposed by the Commission.   The Deputy
Administrator expressed these views at a recent meeting  of the
Water Pollution Control Federation.

VOLKSWAGEN RECALLS 138,000 CARS FOR EMISSION CHECK-UP

Stanley Legro, Assistant Administrator for Enforcement,  recently
urged owners of Volkswagen Rabbit and Scirocco models, 1975 and
early 1976, to take advantage of the maker's offer to correct
defects in the cars' catalytic converters and evaporative  emission
control devices.  EPA and the Transportation Department  had been
investigating user complaints when the voluntary recall  offer  was
made.  About 138,000 cars are involved, the Volkswagen firm said.

CONTROLLED BURNING RECOMMENDED FOR PCB DISPOSAL

Carefully controlled incineration is the best method of  disposing
of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), EPA has concluded.  The oily,
synthetic chemicals, used chiefly as insulating fluids in
electrical equipment, are dangerous if allowed to  escape into  the
environment.  They are toxic, resist natural decay, and  accumulate
in the fatty tissues of plants, animals, and man.   The disposal
guidelines were published in the Federal Register  April  1.

FEDERAL NOISE STANDARDS SET FOR TRUCKS AFTER NEXT  YEAR

All medium and heavy-duty trucks manufactured  after Jan. 1,  1978,
will have to meet EPA noise standards, Administrator  Russell Train
has announced.  He estimated the regulation would  reduce urban
traffic noise by more than 25 percent by the year  1990.
                                                                PACK 25

-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS (A 107)
WASHINGTON. DC. 20460
                                    POSTAGE AND FEES PAID
                   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                  EPA-335
                                   THIRD CLASr
 Return this page if you do NOT wish to receive this publication (  ). or if change of address is needed (  ). list change, includ
             WITHIN   OUR   REA(
  A new film is now available which
 tells  the story  of how an American
 town, Parsippany-Troy Hills.  N.J..
 was  able, with  the  help of EPA. to
 solve its water  pollution problems at
 minimum cost to local taxpayers.
  The movie, which  was produced for
 the  EPA Public Affairs  Office by
 Richter.  McBride. Inc..  is titled
 "Within  Our  Reach" because  it
 shows other cities  and towns  with
 water pollution problems  how  they
 can  use Federal funds to meet 75
 percent of the  cost of the  planning.
 design and  construction of  treatment
 plants.
  Expressing their opinions in this film
 are the mayor, other local and Federal
 officials and citizens who worked to
 help  get the  new waste treatment plant
 for Parsippany-Troy  Hills.
  This community obtained  a $25 mil-
 lion  Federal grant  to  help build its
 plant. The town benefited  in cleaner
 water and also  in the additional  jobs
 created by construction and operation
 of the new facility.
  Parsippany-Troy Hills  is now seeking
 another $30 million  in  Federal funds
 for a tertiary treatment plan and for
 completion of its sewer system.
  The film  notes that  thousands of
 wastewater treatment  facilities are
 now  being built under  the $18-billion
 program authorized by Congress.
  "Yet," the film states, "billions of
 dollars  authorized  by  Congress for
 cleanup construction  are  still  not
 scheduled for use.
  "At least  10,(X)() towns and cities in
 the nation  must still come  forward
 with  grant  applications to improve
 their existing sewage treatment plants.
  "The full eighteen billion dollars pro-
 vided for wastewater treatment  con-
 struction must be committed by  Sep-
Clean water is the goal of the S18-hillion construction grants program.
tember 30.  1977, and must be used
effectively."
 The  movie  closes  with a statement
by Administrator Russell  E.  Train:
"We're all striving for the same goal,
to  clean up the waters of every com-
munity in this country. This is a vital
goal for the  health  of the  American
people, for recreational opportunities
and for the  quality  of life  of present
and future generations. It's a goal that
for the first  time within a hundred
years, is within our reach."
 The  producers  of  the film. Richter
Me Bride, Inc.,  also produced  "The
Gifts," a  prize-winning film on  water
pollution made for the Federal Water
Pollution  Control  Administration.
which  has now  been seen by  an
estimated four million people.
 Much of the photography in "Within
Our  Reach" has  the  same  haunting
beauty which  characterized "The
Gifts" film.
 A  free loan of this  new  17-minute
movie  may be obtained by writing
Modern Talking Picture Service, New
Hyde Park Road,  New Hyde  Park.
New York. 11040. Copies of the film
are  being sent to all Regional Offices
and major EPA laboratories, a

-------