United States
                          Environmental Protection
                          Agency
                    Office of Policy,
                    Planning, and
                    Evaluation
                  EPA230-F-92-004
                  May 1992
                          Climate  Change
                          Discussion  Series
In the next 100 years, the "greenhouse
effect" could lead to rising seas and
dramatic changes in the world's coastal
zones. These changes would affect eco-
systems and human development
alike, and in some regions, valuable
natural, economic,  and  human re-
sources could be lost entirely. There are
policies that could reduce the impact of
sea level rise on the various coastal re-
sources while still allowing human uti-
lization of the coastal zone.

Global climate change could raise sea
level by expanding ocean water and by
increasing the amount of water in the
ocean. The more certain impact is ther-
mal expansion. As a molecule of water is
warmed, greater energy is imparted to
the molecule and its movement in-
creases. As a result, the space between
molecules grows, and the volume of a
given amount of water increases. Warm-
ing of the atmosphere in the next cen-
tury will increase ocean temperatures
enough to raise sea level about 30 cm.

Although the oceans contain most of
the world's water, there is enough
  Sea Level Rise

fresh ground water to raise the sea 20
ft. and enough ice resting on land to
raise the sea over 200 ft. No one has es-
timated the likely impact of future in-
creases in irrigation, although the im-
pact over the last century is only a few
centimeters. In the near term, the larg-
est impact would probably be moun-
tain glaciers, which could melt and
add about 30 cm to sea level.

Over the long term, the polar ice sheets
could raise the sea significantly. In
southern Greenland, warmer air tem-
peratures could lead to
increased melting during
the summer; in West Ant-
arctica, warmer water tem-
peratures could gradually
melt the  floating ice that
prevents the large ice sheet
from sliding into the ocean.
Although the  combined
impact of these polar  ice
sheets is  likely  to  be less
than 50 cm in the next cen-
tury, over the next few cen-
turies the rise could be sev-
eral meters. At least part of
         this rise will probably be offset by in-
         creased snowfall accompanying the
         wanner polar temperatures.

         Current estimates range from 30 to 110
         cm of global sea level rise by 2100. At
         first glance, a meter or more of sea
         level rise in a century may seem en-
         durable, but the coastal zone is a dy-
         namic environment and can be sub-
         ject to rapid change with little prov-
         ocation. Listed below are the primary
         effects of sea level rise on the coast-
         al environment.

        How Much Will Sea Level Rise?
120
                                        2100
  Primaiy Effects of Sea Level Rise
  Erosion One foot of sea level rise can erode beaches 50 to
  300 ft. A one meter rise could cause underdeveloped bar-
  rier islands to break apart.
  Inundation Low-lying sheltered shores not subject to ero-
  sion would still face inundation as the sea rises.
  Infrastructure Costs The combined effects of erosion and
  inundation from a meter of sea level rise could force gov-
  ernments to spend $100 to $300 billion to protect coastal
  property in the United States, if nothing is done to plan for
  sea level rise.
  Storm Surges As sea level rises, the amount of coastal area
  subject to flooding from any size storm will increase.
                  Wetland Loss Many wetlands would not be able to keep up
                  with even a half-meter rise in sea level. Some would
                  be inundated and lost, but others might be able to migrate
                  upland as sea level rises, if the upland zone is not occupied
                  by development. If wetlands are allowed to migrate up-
                  land uninhibited, a one-meter rise in sea level could  still
                  mean a 26 to 66 percent loss in U.S. coastal wetlands.
                  Salt Water Intrusion Thesalhvater wedgeof an estuary will
                  migrate upstream as sea level rises, shifting marine
                  ecosystemsupriver. If the upstream conditions are un-
                  suitable, ecosystems will be lost. Groundwater will be
                  affected, too. Some coastal communities will lose their
                  water supplies as brackish water infiltrates aquifers
                  supplying drinking water.
NOTE: Climate change refers 10 potential modification of the earth's climate resulting from increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon
dioxide (C0:). methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N;O). andchlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Through a naturally occurring process known as the "greenhouse effect." these
gases act to warm the earth by trapping heat in the atmosphere. This process plays an important role in maintaining the earth's current temperature and climate. By
increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, human activities are trapping more heat in the atmosphere and potentially changing the earth's climate.
                                                                              £j Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
 Planning for Sea Level Rise

 States can respond to sea level rise either
 by holding back the sea or by adapting to
 a natural retreat of the shorelines. In the
 next few decades, the impacts of sea level
 rise will be relatively minor in most of the
 nation. There is little need to build dikes
 or fortify beaches in anticipation of a
 problem that is decades away, because
 these projects can be implemented in a
 few years.

 Changes in land use, however, are only
 cost-effective if enacted decades in ad-
 vance. Thus, if communities do not de-
 velop long-term plans for rising sea
 level  today, holding back the  sea may
 be the only viable option for  much of
 the coast. For densely developed areas,
 this result  is reasonable. For  many
moderate and low density areas, how-
ever, the failure to plan could result in
both unnecessary  coastal protection
costs and a loss of marshes, swamps, and
other natural shoreline ecosystems.

New tools for coastal management are
necessary because existing policies, if
applied to all areas threatened by sea
level rise, would almost certainly in-
volve unconstitutional seizure of pri-
vate property. Moreover, most people
would find it unreasonable to prohibit
development in the 7000 square miles
that would be inundated from a one
meter rise in sea level

Fortunately, planning tools are available
that would permit shorelines to migrate
landward without requiring seizure of
private property (see box). The key differ-
ences between these approaches and tra-
ditional regulatory approaches are that
the regulatory approaches tell the prop-
erty owner how to meet the environmen-
tal constraint and has immediate restric-
tions, which can cause large reduc-
tions in property values while the new
approaches simply set the constraint and
allow the market to decide how to com-
ply. The new approaches also defer the
restrictions until they are actually neces-
sary, and when discounted to the present,
the impact on property values is trivial.

Planning for sea level rise is necessary,
"not because there is on impending catas-
trophe, but because there are opportuni-
ties to avoid adverse impacts by acting
now, opportunities that may be lost if
the process is delayed." (LPCC)
  Examples of Potential Policies for Sea Level Rise Planning
   Beach Nourishment Pumping sand onto beaches not only
   protects development from erosion, but has the attributes of
   maintaining beaches and allowing flexible response to sea
   level rise. The total cost of nourishing US. beaches for a one-
   meter rise in sea level could be over $50 billion. Decisions by
   localities depend in part on whether they can rely on state
   funding of beach nourishment If state financing is likely to
   be limited, states should provide localities the authority to
   raise the necessary revenues.
   Prohibit Development Statutes or regulations could be
   used to prevent construction in areas with extreme sensi-
   tivity to human activity.
   Buy Coastal Land Government agencies or conservancies
   could purchase land onto which wetlands could migrate as
   sea level rises.
   Prohibit Bulkheads Do not interfere with private activities
   today, but explicitly notify property owners that as sea level
   rises they will not be allowed to construct bulkheads to
   protect their property.
   Leases  Do not interfere with private activities today but
   convert (with compensation if necessary) property rights
   of current owners to long-term leases which expire after 99
   years, or conditional leases, which expire whenever the
                    sea rises enough to inundate the property. Underlying
                    ownership could belong to the public, or a private conser-
                    vancy group.
                    Public Trust Doctrine In many states, the public is as-
                    sumed to have an easement along the  shore for recre-
                    ational, commercial, and environmental purposes. Court
                    tests are necessary to determine whether this easement
                    moves inland as sea level rises, and whether a permit for a
                    bulkhead relinquishes this easement.
                    Land Titles The common  law "rule against perpetuities"
                    prevents people from ensuring that donated coastal property
                    reverts to nature when the sea rises. State laws exempting
                    charity-to-charity conditions from this rule could be expanded
                    to include an exception for climate change.
                    Louisiana Navigation, flood control, and other projects have
                    increased the vulnerability to the point where even current
                    trends allow the Gulf to reclaim 50 square miles pCT year. Only
                    by restoring  the natural processes that once  enabled the
                    wetlands to keep pace with rising sea will this delta survive
                    the consequences  of global warming. Possible options in-
                    clude allowing a natural diversion to the Atchafalaya River
                    and shifting ocean-bound navigation away from the main
                    channels of the Mississippi River toward alternate routes.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Cliange: Tlie IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of tht University of
Cambridge. 1990.
Titus et al. "Greenhouse Effect and Sea Level Rise: Potential Loss of Land and the Cost of Holding Back the Sea." Coastal Management. 1991 fVol 2).
Titus. "Greenhouse Effect and Coastal Wetland Policy: How Americans Could Abandon an Area the Size of Massachusetts at Minimum Cost.
Environmental Management, Volume 15.1991.
Report of the Coastal Zone Management Sub-Group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

EPA's Climate Change Outreach Program is designed to raise awareness about climate change and provide assistance to state and local
governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations in the evaluation of cost-effective response strategies. For further information
about this program, please contact Joel Smith at 202/260-8825.
                 US. EPA Climate Change Discussion Scries 1992

                    Global Climate Change  Sea Level Rise
                    Adaptation to        Transportation
                     Climate Change     Energy
                    Forestry           Water Resources
                    Agriculture         Biodiversity
              Order from: CUMATE CHANGE INFORMATION
                       U.S. EPA
                       Office of Policy Analysis
                       Climate Change Division (PM221)
                       401 M Street. SW.
                       Washington. DC 20460
                       USA
            |
            3}

            \

-------