United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Narragansett Rl 02882
Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-81-052  Mar. 1982
Project  Summary
Marine  Fish  Larvae
Growth  and  Survival

Edward D. Houde and A. Keith Taniguchi
  This report describes the research
 undertaken to develop and standardize
 culture methods for larvae of two
 common marine fishes, the spotted
 seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus and the
 lined  sole Achirus lineatus. Culture
 methods are  explained and the rela-
 tionships of survival, growth and yield
 to temperatures, food concentration
 and egg  stocking  densities were
 determined.
  Two different diets, a laboratory-
 cultured diet based on the rotifer
 Brachionus plicatifis, supplemented in
 some experiments with brine shrimp
 Anemia salina nauplii,  and a net-
 collected zooplankton diet were com-
 pared. Feeding rates and rations also
 were  estimated for  each species as
 functions of age, size, food type and,
 in the case of seatrout, temperature.
  Despite considerable  variability in
 survival and growth rates, it is possible
 to produce large numbers of larvae at
 any stage from hatching to  meta-
 morphosis for toxicological studies
 including hazard assessment and
 water quality bioassays. Spotted
 seatrout larvae are easier to culture
 successfully than a re lined sole, which
 might be a factor to consider in choice
 of a bioassay test organism.
  This Project Summary was devel-
 oped  by EPA's Environmental Re-
 search Laboratory, Narragansett, Rl,
 to  announce key findings of the
 research project that is fully  docu-
 mented in a  separate report of the
 same  title (see Project Report ordering
 information at back).
Introduction
  The larval stages of marine organ isms
are particularly sensitive  to environ-
mental stresses. Despite more difficulty
in culturing  and maintaining  these
stages  it is  useful to evaluate the
potential effects of environmental
contaminants  on larval development.
The ability to culture marine fish  larvae
for experimental purposes has increased
greatly in the past 10 years. However,
successful rearing techniques have not
been standardized although there is a
general recognition of important factors
that affect both survival and condition of
larvae. The role of food and nutrition in
larval culture  is most important.
  The purpose of this research was to
develop and evaluate standard method-
ology to culture larvae of two common
marine fishes, so that large numbers of
healthy larvae or juveniles could be
predictably  produced  for  toxicological
research. Two species that are found in
coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico and
southeastern  United States, the spotted
seatrout (Cynoscion  nebulosus) and
lined sole (Achirus lineatus).  were
selected for this  project to investigate
how survival, growth  and  condition of
the larvae were affected by culture
methods.
  Research results reported here fo-
cused on the roles of prey type and prey
availability in predictably producing
metamorphosed  spotted seatrout and
lined sole.  Feeding  rates of the  larvae
were determined as a function of age
and in relation to the culture regime. In
addition  to aiding design  of pollution

-------
and contaminant-oriented experiments,
results  of  this study have  helped  to
document environmental requirements
of larvae of the two species.

Results and Discussion
  Both spotted seatrout and lined sole
can be reared on a diet of zooplankton or
lab cultured food including rotifers and
brine  shrimp nauplii. Survival rates at
metamorphosis increased as food con-
centrations were raised. Embryo stock-
ing levels had a relatively small effect on
survival, but  lowest survival  rates
usually were  observed  at highest
stocking levels.

Spotted Seatrout
  Percent  survival over  all  factor
combinations ranged up to 73.4% for
spotted seatrout farvae reared on
zooplankton and  to 80.5% for  larvae
reared on  rotifers (Table  1).  On  a
zooplankton diet mean survival rate
increased from 15.1  to 73.4% as food
level was raised from 25 to 5000 per
liter. Survival was significantly higher at
28° than at 24° or 32°C.
  Survival of seatrout larvae that were
fed rotifers did not differ significantly
from survival of zooplankton-fed larvae.
Mean survival  rates  over all food
concentrations and stock densities
were  37.9% for zooplankton-fed larvae
and 43.6% for rotifer-fed larvae. Survival
of larvae increased significantly as food
level was raised for both diets.
  Growth of seatrout larvae, expressed
as  standard  length and dry weight,
increased significantly as zooplankton
concentrations and  temperatures were
raised (Table 2). Lengths and weights of
larvae  decreased  as stock density
increased.  Growth  increased as  food
concentration was raised  for  larvae
reared on the rotifer diet and decreased
as  stock  density increased, but the
effects  were  not as clear as for
zooplankton-fed larvae (Table 3). At the
1 000 per liter food concentration mean
dry weights of seatrout larvae were 6.1
times higher on the  zooplankton diet
than on the rotifer diet.
  A laboratory cultured diet of rotifers-
Artemia was similar to the zooplankton
diet in  supporting survival  of spotted
seatrout, Table 2.

Lined Sole
  Survival rates, presented as 90%
confidence intervals, ranged  up  to
63.2% over all factor combinations for
larvae fed zooplankton and to 55.4% for
larvae fed  rotifers,  (Table 3). Survival
increased significantly as food  levels
were  raised for  both  zooplankton and
rotifer foods. There was some evidence
that survival was higher on rotifers  at
the lowest food levels and on zooplankton
at the highest food level. At food levels
of  1000  per liter  or higher,  either
zooplankton or rotifers could be used to
rear large numbers of lined  sole  to
metamorphosis.
  Lined sole grew  relatively fast on
zooplankton compared to rotifers. Over
all factor combinations, mean standard
lengths at 16 days were 3.93 mm on the
zooplankton diet and only  3.40 mm on
the rotifer diet. The  difference in mean
weights at  16 days  was even more
striking; survivors averaged 209-pg on
the zooplankton diet but only 1 23-jug on
the rotifer diet. Mean standard lengths
and dry weights  were significantly
higher at the 1000 per liter food levels
compared  to the 50 and 100 per liter
levels for both diets.
  Thirteen to 25  day old lined sole had
equally good survival and slightly better
growth on the lab-reared diet of rotifers-
Artemia compared to  zooplankton fed
larvae, Table 4.

Length-Weight Relationships

Spotted Seatrout
  The exponent in power functions that
described the length-weight relationship
for spotted  seatrout larvae  reared  at
three different temperatures, over three
food levels (25, 100, 1000 food items
Table 1.     Spotted Seairout .  Ninety Percent Confidence Intervals about the Means for Percent Survival. Standard Length.
           Dry Weight Per Larva and Total Yields of Larvae at 12 Days After Hatching Reared at 28°C on Either a Zooplankton
           or Rotifer Diet. Confidence Limits are Placed on Means Over All Factor Combinations at the Designated Factor Level.

                                                             .90 Confidence Limits
Factor
and Level
1. Zooplankton Food 28°
Food Concentration
25
WO
WOO
5000
Stock Density (Food Concentration -
0.5
5.0
25.0
II. Rotifer Food 28°
Food Concentration
25
WO
WOO
5000
Stock Density {Food Concentration -
0.5
5.0
25.0
Percent
Survival


6.7 to 15.1
18.7 to 33.6
49. 3 to 53.1
65.7 to 7 3. 4
WOO /I)
44.5 to 51. 7
37. 2 to 52.0
15.4 to 29.4


10.9 to 35.5
36.3 to 44.3
31. 8 to 53.6
56.9 to 80.5
WOO /I)
21. 3 to 49.7
47. 9 to 53.3
39.9 to 50. 1
Standard
Length (mm)


3. 13 to 4.75
2.71 to 5.85
4.31 to7.51
5.75 to 8.81

7.23 to 10.37
5. 52 to 8.48
5. 18 to 6.88


2.33 to 3. 57
2.68 to 4. 38
3.42 to 4. 1O
3. 50 to 4. 42

3.88 to 5.20
3.7 8 to 4. 50
3.26 to 3.86
Larval
Dry Weight fag)


30.7to 341.7
O.Oto 509.7
0.0 to 1285.4
205.7 to 221 4.0

11 59.6 to 3067.4
697.9 to 1628.7
453.0 to 938.2


0.0 to 11 9.7
0.0 to 233.1
77.2 to 122.8
44. 1 to 224. 7

87.3(0372.1
96.1 to 197.7
65.1 to 11 5.1
Total Yield fmg!


O.Oto 5.2
6.2 to 11.1
65. 6 to 74.0
166.2 to 179.2

5.3 to 12.5
25.5 to 33.1
33.3to41.7


O.Oto 8.9
2.0 to 10.0
O.Oto 13.1
15.2 to 22.0

O.Oto 6.9
7.0 to 12.4
18.2 to 24.6

-------
Egg Source
Plankton
Plankton
Hormone
Hormone
Plankton
Plankton
Hormone
Hormone
Food Type
(1000/1)
Rotifer-Anc.miB
Rotifer-Anemia
Rotifer-Anemia
Rotifer-Anemia
Zooplankton
Zooplankton
Zooplankton
Zooplankton
Percent Survival
IStock Density 0.5/1)
657
27.1
20.0
62.3
60.0
27.4
37.7
643
Mean Standard
Length (mm)
/••- 1 S.E.)
11.97 ± 0.19
8.56 ± 0.18
8.94 ± 034
7.72 ± 0.09
15.49 ± 022
1482 ± 033
15.51 ±0.17
11.69 ±0.11
                                   Means
Table2.    Spotted Seairout .  Percent Survival and Mean Length of Larvae Reared     per  liter), differed  significantly. The
           to 16 Days After Hatching at 28°C on Either a Rot/fer-Anem\a  or          exponent at 28°C, for either rotifer or
           Zooplankton Diet. Two Egg Sources. Plankton-Collected or Hormone-       zooplankton  diets,  was significantly
           Induced, also Were Compared.                                          higher (Analysis  of  Covariance) than
                                                                                those at 24° or 32°C. The equations are:

                                                                                  •  zooplankton  food  24°—W =
                                                                                     1.071L34'
                                                                                  •  zooplankton food 28°—W= 0.51 L39'
                                                                                  •  rotifer food 28°—W = 0.50L393
                                                                                  •  zooplankton food 32°—W = 0.83L362

                                                                                There was  no  evidence  that food
                                                                                concentrations had a significant effect
                                                                                on the length-weight relationships. The
                                                                                combined  length-weight  relationship
                                                                                for both of the food types, all temperature
                                                                                and  food concentrations  was: W =
                                                                                0.75L366.
                                                                                  Length-weight relationships, in theory,
                                                                                can  be  used as an  index of larval
                                                                                conditions. High values of the exponent
                                                                                in the power function  relationships
                                                                                indicate that  larvae are relatively "fat"
                                                                                and presumably better conditioned. We
                                                                                did not find effects of food concentration
                                                                                on  length-weight relationships  of
                                                                                spotted  seatrout.  This result indicates
                                                                                that the length-weight relationship may
                                                                                not  be useful to judge effects of diet on
                                                                                larval condition for this  species. Tem-
                   ~~~                                                        perature did  seem  to have an easily
                                                                                detected effect of length-weight rela-
                                                                                tionships  for spotted  seatrout.  The

          Lined Sole . Ninety Percent Confidence Intervals About the Means for Percent Survival. Standard Length, Dry
          Weight Per Larva and Total Yields of Larvae at  12 Days After Hatching Reared at 28°C on Either a Zooplankton or
          Rotifer Diet. Confidence Limits are Placed on Means Over All Factor Combinations at the Designated Factor  Level.

                                                             .90 Confidence Limits
               Percent Survival

                Plankton eggs
                Hormone eggs
                Rotifer-Anemia  diet
                Zooplankton diet

               Standard Length

                Plankton eggs
                Hormone eggs
                Rotifer-Artem\a  diet
                Zooplankton diet
  43.6%
  46.1%
  43.9%
  45.7%
12.71 mm
10.97 mm
 9.30 mm
14.38 mm
Table 3.
                                     Percent
                                     Survival
                                                           Standard
                                                         Length (mm)
                                   Larval
                               Dry Weight
Total Yield (mg)
 I.  Zooplankton Food 28°
   Food Concentration fStock Density 0.5/1)
     50                             0.0 to 2.0
    100                             2.2 to 12.5
   WOO                           30.8 to 63.2
 Stock Density (Food Concentration - 1000/1)
    0.5                             2.6 to 60.8
    2.0                             0.0 to 30.0
    8.0                             0.8 to 38.8
   16.0                             0.0to21.7
 II. Rotifer Food 28°
   Food Concentration (Stock Density - 0.5/1)
                                                          3.31 to3.33
                                                          3.32 to 3.78
                                                          3.97 to 4.49

                                                          3 50 to 4.62
                                                          3.12 to 4.52
                                                          3.31 to 4.19
                                                          3.51 to3.81
                                56.6 to  97.4
                                87.8to 161.0
                               196 3 to 313.1

                                99.1 to 372.6
                                34.5 to 249.3
                                93.1 to 229.5
                                90.2 to 249.5
  0.0 to <0.1
 <0.1 to   1.8
  5.3 to 26.2

 <0.1 to   4.6
 <0.1 to   3.1
 
-------
Table 4.    Lined Sole .  Percent Survival and Mean Length of Larvae Reared
           to 25 Days After Hatching at 28°C on Either a Rotifer-Anemia or
           Zooplankton Diet.
Food Type
(500/1)
Rotifer-Anemia
/?of//er-Artemia
/?or//er-Artemia
Zooplankton
Zooplankton
Zooplankton
Percent Survival
(Stock Density, 0.5/1)
54.3
75.7
40.0
51.4
48.6
70.0
Mean Standard
Length (mm)
(± 1 S.E.)
7.72 ±0.11
7.01 ± 0.07
6.84 ± 0.15
677 ±0.14
6.29 ±011
6.38 ± 0.08
                                   Means
               Percent Survival

                /?or//er-Artemia  diet
                Zooplankton diet

               Standard Length

                Rotifer-Anemia  diet
                Zooplankton diet
        56.7%
        56.7%
       7.19 mm
       6.48 mm
"fattest" larvae, regardless of diet type,
were reared at 28°C. Larvae at  lower
and higher temperatures  apparently
were less well conditioned.

Lined Sole
  The only length-weight relationships
that were obtained for lined sole were
those at 28°C for both the zooplankton
and rotifer diet, when food concentra-
tions were 1000 per liter. There were no
significant differences in the relation-
ships:

  • zooplankton food—W = 0.60L403
  • rotifer food—W = 0.63L405

Thus, there appeared to be no differences
in condition of lined sole when reared at
high food concentration for either type
of food. The length-weight relationship
from pooled zooplankton and rotifer-fed
lined sole larvae was W = 0.60L406.

Conclusions
  Both spotted seatrout and  lined sole
can be routinely reared from hatching
through  metamorphosis on either a
zooplankton  or rotifer diet. Survival
rates exceeding 50% from hatching to
metamorphosis   can  be  predictably
obtained. Survival did not differ between
the  diets, but growth and yield  were
significantly higher on the zooplankton
diet  when equal  food concentrations
were compared. Survival, growth and
yield can be predicted with reasonable
confidence  as a  function of  food
concentration, but with less confidence
as a  function of stock density. At
moderately high  food  concentrations,
the degree of variability in survival and
growth responses was similar on either
the zooplankton or rotifer diet.
  Spotted seatrout larvae  survived
better at 28° than at 24 or 32°C,  but
individual growth  was best  at 32°C.
Growth and survival was increased as
food  levels were raised. Despite poorer
survival and  growth of individuals at
high  stock densities, total yields of both
seatrout  and  lined sole  increased as
stocking density was raised.
  A laboratory-cultured diet of rotifers
and Anemia salina nauplii was adequate
to grow spotted seatrout and lined sole
well  into the  juvenile stage with equal
survival  rates compared to fish  fed
zooplankton. Growth of spotted seatrout
was  relatively poor on rotifers-/4rfem/a
compared to zooplankton, but lined sole
growth did not differ between diets. The
Artemia component of the lab-cultured
diet  was responsible  for the good
growth of lined sole on that diet.
  Eggs of spotted seatrout from plankton
collections or from  hormone-induced
spawning gave  equal survival  and
growth results in larval rearing experi-
ments.
  Growth of spotted seatrout larvae
was faster than that of line sole larvae at
equal  food  concentrations. Specific
growth  rates  of  spotted seatrout  fed
zooplankton at 28°C ranged from 44.9
to 69.4% per day over the range of food
concentrations that was fed, while lined
sole  specific growth  rates ranged from
20.3 to 38.5% per day. Seatrout larvae
growth rates were among the fastest
reported for fish larvae, the maximum
measured rate being 76.5% per day at
32°C and  1000 zooplankters per liter.
  Feeding rates and rations were
determined as functions of age and size
of larvae  as  well as  of food concen-
trations,  and  in the  case  of spotted
seatrout the effect of temperature also
was documented.  Under the same
conditions  seatrout  larvae  consumed
more food per unit time than  did lined
sole. Consumption  of  rotifers by 2-6
day-old seatrout larvae was higher than
zooplankton consumption, but subse-
quently zooplankton was consumed at
higher rates,  as larval predatory ability
increased. Both seatrout and lined sole
larvae could consume much more than
100% of their body weight perday when
food concentrations  were high.
  Length-weight  relationships  were
determined as functions of food con-
centration, food type (zooplankton  or
rotifers)  and  temperature for spotted
seatrout larvae. Only temperature had a
significant  effect  on the relationship;
the fattest larvae were reared at 28°C.
No  significant difference was  found in
the length-weight relationship for lined
sole reared at  28°  on zooplankton  or
rotifers at a 1000 per liter food concen-
tration.
  A routine culture procedure to provide
spotted seatrout or lined sole larvae for
aquatic toxicology  research could be
based upon 28°C rearing temperatures,
1000 per  liter food  concentrations
(either zooplankton or rotifers) and a 5.0
per liter egg  stocking density. Growth
rates and survival rates of both species
are higher at  food levels  exceeding
1000 per  liter, but such levelsare unlike
any found in nature. If the goal of the
toxicological  study were to provide a
large amount of assay material (i.e.,
yield),  then  egg stocking densities
higher than 5.0 per liter could be used.
                                  4

-------
Edward D.  Houde and A. Keith Taniguchi are  with the Rosenstiel School of
  Marine and Atmospheric Science,  University of Miami. Miami, FL 33J49.
Allan D. Beck is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The  complete report,  entitled "Marine  Fish Larvae Growth and Survival,"
  (Order No. PB 82-1OJ  395; Cost: $9.50. subject to change! will be available
  only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA  22161
        Telephone:  703-487-4650
The EPA Protect Officer  can be contacted at:
        Environmental Research Laboratory
        US.  Environmental Protection Agency
        South Ferry Road
        Narragansett, Rl 02882
                                                                              . S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1982/559-092/3378

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300

-------