United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
At he nsG A 30613
                   Research and Development
EPA-600/S3-84-055 May 1984
vyEPA         Project Summary
                   Field-to-Stream  Transport  of
                   Agricultural  Chemicals and
                   Sediment  in  an  Iowa  Watershed:
                   Part II.  Data  Base  for  Model
                   Testing  (1979  -  1980)
                   HP. Johnson and J.L. Baker
                    In a continuation of a previous
                   project, data were collected on the
                   field-to-stream transport of sediment,
                   nutrients, and pesticides in an agricul-
                   tural watershed. These data contribute
                   to an improved qualitative understand-
                   ing of the field-to-stream processes
                   involved and provide a quantitative
                   base for testing mathematical models
                   that predict hydrology, erosion,  and
                   sediment and chemical transport.
                    During the  study reported  here
                   (1979-1980), data were collected for
                   small corn, soybean and pasture fields;
                   for two larger mixed-cover sub-water-
                   sheds; and at  three drainage stream
                   sites. In 1979, annual  rainfall (1009
                   mm) was well above the long-term
                   average (823 mm), with several intense
                   rainstorms occurring in June and July.
                   As a result, stream flow (445 mm) was
                   more than twice the normal amount,
                   and sediment losses from the row-crop
                   field sites were very high (average of
                   63.3 t/ha). Soil loss from the watershed
                   as a whole was 7.6 t/ha in 1979. In
                   1980, precipitation (744 mm) and
                   stream flow (182 mm) were slightly
                   below normal; soil loss  from  the
                   watershed was 3.8 t/ha. In December
                   1979,  P was fall-applied in the field
                   sites without incorporation; as a result,
                   PO4-P concentrations in snowmelt and
                   rainfall-runoff were over 1 mg/L until
                   the fertilizer was soil-incorporated
                   using tillage.
  Flow from the watershed was roughly
half subsurface flow and half surface
runoff, with about half of the surface
runoff being snowmelt. During extended
high flows between surface runoff
events, in-stream IMOa-N concentrations
were high and very similar to those in
flow from  shallow subsurface tile
drains. The percentage of stream- flow
derived from subsurface drainage could
be estimated, at any given time, from
knowledge of NOa-N concentrations in
in-stream, surface and subsurface flow.
NOa-N losses from the whole watershed
in  stream flow averaged 25 kg/ha,
equal to 28% of the N  applied as
fertilizer.
  The severe runoff-erosion events in
1979 resulted in field runoff losses of
herbicide as high as 7.2% (for metribuzin)
most of which was associated with the
water phase for the four herbicides
studied (alachlor, propachlor, cyanazine,
and metribuzin). The maximum loss
from the whole watershed in 1979 was
2.0% (for metribuzin). In 1980, the
maximum field loss was 2.8% (for
cyanazine); for the whole watershed,
maximum loss was 1.9% (for alachlor).
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Environmental Research
Laboratory, Athens. GA, to announce
key findings of the research project that
/s fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

-------
Introduction
  In an effort to achieve national water
quality goals, water  pollution control
activities have been directed increasingly
at agricultural  nonpoint  sources.  This
resulted from the knowledge that control
of point municipal and industrial sources
alone would  not allow the goals  to be
reached, particularly  in predominantly
agricultural  areas such as Iowa. In
addition, the increasing role of agriculture
in our national economy and international
trade has  resulted in more intensive
agricultural management  to increase
production. Consequently, more  land,
which is usually less suitablefor cropping
because of poor soils or higher slopes, is
being put into production. Also, chemical
inputs  are being increased to  produce
higher yields on  currently cropped  land.
  The study watershed illustrates  these
last  two factors. Between 1970 and
1980,  the percentage  of  the study
watershed  in row-crops increased from
55 to 80%; land in  pasture, hay, grass,
oats, government set-aside, and  wood
lots  was  reduced. Herbicides  were
applied to 40% of the watershed in 1970
and  to 80% in 1980;  nitrogen fertilizer
use  increased 2.3 times  in this period,
due to the increased area  of row-crops,
increased  percentage  of row-crop  area
treated, and increased application rates.
  Although increased  erosion and agri-
cultural chemical losses are unintended
side effects  of  the highly  productive
agricultural systems, research has
demonstrated that management practices
can  be used to help  control these
undesirable effects.  The concept of Best
Management Practices  (BMPs)  was
developed as the  primary means of
controlling agricultural nonpoint sources
of pollution. These  practices are  to be
effective and  technically  feasible, and
socially and  economically acceptable.
Practices such as the use of conservation
tillage and the installation of terraces and
grassed waterways decrease sediment
loss and sediment associated pollutants.
Others, such as soil incorporation of
chemicals, decrease chemical interaction
with overland flow and thereby decrease
chemical concentrations  and losses in
surface runoff.
  It is neither physically nor economically
practical to field test every potential BMP
for  all  agricultural chemicals and for all
possible combinations of  weather and
field conditions. Therefore, work has
been undertaken to develop mathematical
models (from knowledge of physical and
chemical processes) that are capable of
predicting  BMP effectiveness for different
sets of conditions. In the development of
these models, transport processes in the
field and possible chemical transforma-
tions and their impact on concentrations
and losses must  be  understood.  In
addition, once a model has been devel-
oped, field data are necessary to test its
validity.
  In 1976,  Iowa State University began
the collection of field data in the Four Mile
Creek watershed in Tama County, Iowa.
Results for  1976  through 1978 were
presented in a  report entitled "Field-to-
Stream Transport of Agricultural Chem-
icals and Sediment in an Iowa Watershed,
Part I: Data Base for Modeling (1976-
1978)," EPA-600/3-82-032. This report
(Part II) presents the 1979 and 1980 field
data on runoff and sediment and chemical
losses for three small, single cover fields
(including soil sampling data); two mixed
cover,  intra-basin sub-watersheds; and
three stream stations. Watershed inven-
tory and weather  data are included,
together with  data on  sediment sizes,
sediment deposition, and the stream
channel as a sediment source.
  As  a culmination of  this  project,  a
national conference was held in Ames,
Iowa, in 1981 to gather and disseminate
information on  the state-of-the-art  with
respect to  agricultural  nonpoint source
pollution problems and their management.
Twenty-five  papers  were presented
covering work from various universities,
government agencies,  and practicing
engineering groups.


Results
  The inventory data for  Four Mile Creek
watershed, presented  in Table  1, show
that land planted to row-crops (corn and
soybeans)  accounted for  80% of  the
watershed  area for 1979 and 1980, an
increase of about 3% from the  1976 to
1978 study period, and an increase of
25% from 1970. The percentage of  corn
fertilized increased from 88% in 1970 to
99% in 1980, for soybeans the proportions
were 4 and 28%, respectively. Application
of N on the whole watershed increased a
factor of 2.3 times in those ten years, as a
result  of increased percentage of  corn
fertilized, increased area planted to  corn
(39 to 56%), and increased application
rate (123  to 178 kg/ha). Although
application rates  of P on  corn  and
soybeans (and K on soybeans) decreased,
the area fertilized increased substantially,
so application of P to the whole watershed
increased 1.5 times (1.8 times for K).
  Herbicide  use on corn and soybeans
increased  from  1970  (70 and 75%,
respectively) to  the point in 1980 when
Table 1.    Four Mile Creek Watershed In-
          ventory

                  1970"   1979  1980
Corn !% area)
fertilized (%>
N (kg/ ha)
PsOs (kg/ ha)
herbicide (%)
insecticide f%)
Soybeans (% area}
fertilized (%)
P20$ Ikg/ha)
herbicide <%)
39
88
123
71
71
54
16
4
76
75
50
98
181
61
98
78
30
26
52
99
56
99
178
62
99
70
24
28
57
100
*Values have been revised since Part I report.

over 99% of the row-crop area received
herbicide treatment. Five herbicides,
alachlor, atrazine, butylate, cyanazine
and 2,4-D, represented at least 90% by
weight of herbicides used on corn.  For
soybeans, the five herbicides,  alachlor,
bentazon, chloramben, metribuzin and
trifluralin, represented at least  90% by
weight of  herbicides used.  Insecticide
use increased from 54% of the corn area
treated in 1970 to 70% in 1980; soybeans
received no insecticide. Five insecticides,
carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, fonofos, phorate
and terbufos, represented over  95% by
weight of the insecticide used.
  With respect  to tillage, the  biggest
change from  1976 to 1980  came with
substitution of use of a disk or chisel for
use of the moldboard plow for  primary
tillage. In 1976,  51, 38 and 11% of  the
cropland  (corn, soybeans, oats, hay and
pasture) were moldboard plowed, disked
and chisel plowed, respectively. In 1980,
the corresponding figures were  16, 54
and 28% (there was  1% buffalo-till and
less than 1% no-till). In 1976,0.5% of the
cropland  was terraced; in  1980,  3% was
terraced.  Contouring  increased from  6%
of the row-cropped land in 1976 to 19% in
1980.
  As shown in  Table 2,  precipitation in
the watershed  during the study period
varied significantly  from the average
yearly precipitation of about 823 mm for
the area. In 1979, precipitation in  the
watershed was 186 mm above the average
and, in 1980, 79 mm  below average. Not
only was the rainfall amount in 1979
above  average,  rainfall  intensities at
individual rain gages within the watershed
registered four particularly severe events
in June and July (13 events total) with
return intervals from 5 to 100 years for
different  durations. This rainfall, coupled
with a soil profile well filled with moisture
in the fall of 1978,  resulted in large
amounts  of runoff. About 45% of the total
stream flow in the 5-year study (1976 to
1980) occurred in 1979. Although rainfall
was  below average in 1980, there were

-------
Table 2.    Nutrients and Sediment in Precipitation, Surface Runoff, Tile, and Creek Flow

Precipitation

Runoff
Corn:
Site 1
Site 2"
Soybeans:
Site 2
Site T
Pasture:
Site 3

Tile drainage

Intra basin
Site 7
284 ha
Site 8
149 ha
Creek
Site 6
345 ha
Site 5
3575 ha
Site 4
5055 ha
Year
1979
1980


1979
1980

1979
1980

1979
1980
1979
1980

1979
1980
1979
1980

1979
1980
1979
1980
1979
1980
Amount
mm
1009
744


251.5
119.6

199.3
88.4

66.1
45.3



111.4
92.4
137.4
74.0

394.3
143.1
422.7
179.2
444.6
182.4
Nh
ppm
0.59
0.70


0.34
0.52

0.14
0.52

0.31
047
0.12
0.08

0.52
1.02
0.22
0.36

0.20
0.63
0.54
0.70
0.52
0.51
kg/ha
5.97
5.24


0.86
0.62

0.28
0.46

0.2}
0.21



0.57
0.94
0.30
0.26

0.72
0.90
2.29
1.25
2.33
0.93
NOz-N •
ppm kg /ha
0.6
0.8


2.2
1.3

1.0
1.3

1.0
1.1
12.3
11.1

3.5
3.4
2.1
1.5

8.8
6.1
8.9
7.1
8.0
6.3
6.3
5.7


5.7
1.6

2.0
1.1

.6
.5



3.9
3.1
2.8
1. 1

30.7
8.8
37.7
12.7
35.4
11.5
PO
ppm
0035
0.063


0.096
0.723

0.120
1.512

0.787
0.930
0.090
0.082

0.671
0.808
0.293
0.328

0.115
0.318
0.248
0.209
0.155
0.141
t-P
kg/ha
0.357
0.467


0.242
0.865

0.240
1.336

0.520
0.421

-

0.748
0.746
0403
0.243

0.402
0.456
1.048
0.375
0.689
0.258
Cl
ppm kg/ha
1.6
0.8


4.0
10.2

3.6
20.4

3.7
8.2
16.1
19.0

8.8
7.6
4.8
7.4

11.2
13.5
14.2
14.0
12.0
13.2
16.2
6.1


10.1
12.2

72
18.1

2.4
3.7



9.8
7.0
6.7
5.5

39.1
19.3
59.9
25.0
53.3
24.1
TDS
• ppm kg /ha
7
11


69
88

91
133

83
63
316
331

135
148
96
97

230
214
267
221
220
247
74
82


175
105

180
118

55
29

-

150
137
132
72

804
306
1129
396
977
450
Sediment
ppm kg/ha
.
.


20424
9245

37771
2458

64
30



1100
6034
13769
8828

4328
2046
1693
2075
1712
2062




51369
11061

75272
2172

42
14



1225
5576
18914
6534

15120
2954
7156
3718
7612
3760
'Sites 1 and 2 were fall fertilized before the 1980 growing season; fertilizer was incorporated in the spring by chisel plowing on site 1 and disking on
 site 2.
eight  runoff events in that year. In late
1979, the soil profile was wetter than in
the fall of 1978. This, coupled with the
significant rainfall  events that occurred
during the 1980 growing season, resulted
in  runoff from the watershed.
  For all  but the four extreme events of
1979, the field that had been in  corn the
previous year  and  had been  spring-
plowed had the least runoff (or  in some
cases no runoff when there was runoff
from  the other row-cropped  site).  In
addition,  the plowed field  (in soybeans)
was cultivated once in June and once in
July each year, but the corn field was not
cultivated. For the four extreme events in
June  and July 1979, runoff volumes
from sites 1 and 2 were nearly identical,
seemingly  independent  of previous  or
recent tillage, crop or crop  canopy,  or
watershed topography. For these events,
runoff ranged from 20 to 59% of precipi-
tation.
  The portion of stream flow during storm
events that was subsurface flow was
determined by an interpolation technique
between  the time of  beginning of runoff
and the  time  runoff was  calculated  to
have ended. Because there was such a
large  difference between NOa-N, Cl and
TDS concentrations in stream flow which
was all subsurface drainage (very similar
to  concentrations  in the  tile drainage
water) and in surface runoff, knowledge
of the concentrations in the total stream
flow at any given time could be used to
estimate  the  portion  of stream  flow
attributable to subsurface drainage and
(or) surface runoff at that time.
  The four severe events in 1979 caused
severe erosion and sediment transport.
As also evidenced in 1976 to 1978,1979
flow-weighted sediment  concentrations
for the larger events were  generally
greater for  the  soybean  cropped  field
(moldboard plowed before planting) than
for the corn field (disked before planting).
In 1980, when the soybean cropped field
was chisel plowed, 33% residue cover
remained  after planting, and sediment
concentrations were less than those for
the corn field, which had been disked and
had only 8% residue cover after planting.
Much less rainfall-runoff occurred  from
the chisel plowed field, resulting in soil
losses only  one-fifth of those from the
disked field. For  all  events analyzed, the
sediment  load decreased as sediment
moved from field (sites 1 and 2) to intra-
basin (sites 7 and 8) to stream (site 4).
  Annual  nutrient loss  data and nutrient
amounts deposited with precipitation for
1979 and  1980 are presented in Table 2
together  with annual flow-weighted
concentrations and arithmetic  average
concentrations of nutrients in tile drainage
water. During snowmelt, NH4-N concen-
trations in runoff from the row-cropped
fields were  somewhat  higher than
concentrations later in  the growing
season. One of the differences between
snowmelt runoff and later rainfall runoff
4s the degree of contact with the soil. NHa-
N concentrations in runoff from the corn
field in 1979 and 1980 were highest in
runoff for  the first events following N
fertilizer application, although the ferti-
lizer had been incorporated by disking.
Annual NH4-N losses from  the single
cover fields and pasture were al! less than
1 kg/ha, and  much less than the 5 to 6
kg/ha deposited with  precipitation. Total
watershed losses were at most  2.3
kg/ha,  the  majority of which occurred
during snowmelt in 1979.
  During  snowmelt,  NOs-N concentra-
tions in runoff from the three single cover
fields and  pasture were very similar to
concentrations in the  snowfall itself. As
evidenced by the high NOu-N concentra-
tions in tile drainage water, the leachabil-
ity of NOa-N can result in large losses. The
very close match between NCb-N concen-
trations in subsurface stream flow and in
the tile drainage  water, would  indicate
that during the sustained  high flow be-
tween  closely spaced rainfall-runoff
events, most of the stream  flow consisted
of subsurface drainage from tile drains.
Annual NOa-N losses  in  surface runoff
averaged  2.6 kg/ha from  the row-
cropped fields and less than 1 kg/ha from

-------
the pasture. This was  less than the 6
kg/ha deposited  with precipitation.
Annual NOa-N losses with stream flow
were much larger because they included
leaching losses.
  During  snowmelt in 1979, POi-P
concentrations in runoff from the row-
cropped fields were similar «0.1  ppm)
to those for rainfall-runoff events later in
the growing season after tillage  and
planting. This indicates that the unincor-
porated corn and soybean residue was
releasing little, if any, P0.4-P to snowmelt
runoff. P04-P levels in snowmelt runoff
from  the  pasture were high (nearly 1
ppm), however, because  of dead and
decaying  grass, animal wastes,  and
previously applied P fertilizer on the soil
surface. The high in-stream levels of P0<-
P during snowmelt probably also resulted
from these surface sources of PO<-P. The
higher concentrations in field runoff in
1980 resulted from P application  in
December 1979 without soil incorpora-
tion. Losses were  only about  1 kg/ha,
however, with winter rains and snowmelt
in 1980.
  In general, nutrient concentrations in
sediment increased as sediment concen-
trations in runoff decreased. This would
be  expected if chemical activity  of
sediment  increased as sediment size
decreased (greater surface area per unit
mass) and sediment size  decreased  as
sediment concentrations decreased. The
equation:
       nutrient concentration =
      a (sediment concentration)""
where a and b are empirical parameters,
fitted the nutrient and sediment concen-
tration data quite  well. For the row-
cropped fields, total N and  P losses were
dominated by the losses associated with
sediment.
  Table 3 shows  the  percentages  of
applied herbicides lost from the row-crop
fields and the whole watershed on an
annual basis for 1979 and 1980.  For
1979, there were three particularly
severe events for which runoff from  the
row-cropped fields exceeded 34 mm, and
a fourth for which  runoff  exceeded 12
mm. As is almost always  the case,  the
first significant storm after herbicide
application resulted in the largest single-
event field losses. From 63 to 93% of the
measured annual losses from sites 1 and
2 occurred during this one storm. For the
whole watershed, from 46 to 74% of the
annual losses occurred during this event.
Because of the severe  events in 1979,
field runoff  losses were much higher
than they were in 1976 to 1978, when
losses of the four  herbicides studied
never  exceeded 1% of  the amounts
applied. The  greatest  recorded  loss in
1979 was for metribuzin, when 7.2% of
that applied was lost from the field and
2.0% from  the whole  watershed.  The
trend of  lower storm losses from the
watershed as a whole than those mea-
sured at the field  borders,  which  was
evident in the 1976 to 1978 data,  was
also evident in 1979.
  In 1980, storms in a 5-day period in late
spring resulted in most of the measured
herbicide runoff losses from both the field
and whole watershed. These events also
accounted for most of the rainfall-runoff
that occurred in 1980.
  The May-June surface runoff amounts
for  the whole watershed for 1979 and
1980 were  both about 42 mm,  and
annual  herbicide losses were  similar
(although the relative amounts of alachlor
and metribuzin  lost were reversed). The
May-June surface runoff amounts for the
disked corn field (site 1 in 1979, site 2 in
1980) were also similar (51 mm in 1979,
48  mm in 1980), with cyanazine losses
somewhat less for 1980, and propachlor
losses somewhat greater. For the soybean
field, which was moldboard plowed  (site
2) in 1979, but chisel plowed (site  1) in
1980, May-June runoff was much less in
1980 (14 mm) than in 1 979(48 mm), and
therefore alachlor and metribuzin  field
losses were also less  in   1980.  The
herbicides were so much  affected by
decreased runoff that the trend of larger
field losses than whole watershed losses
was reversed  for  alachlor and  was
marginal for metribuzin. It appears  that
for  1980,  chisel  plowing of site 1
decreased herbicide losses by decreasing
runoff as well as by decreasing erosion).
For all cases a majority of the annual
losses occurred with water.

Observations and Conclusions
  • For smaller,  less severe runoff
     events, the fields  with the  most
     recent or more intensive tillage had
     significantly less runoff.
TableS.
Year
1979
1980
Percentage of Applied Herbicides Lost
Site Alachlor Metribuzin
field
4 mi watershed
field
4 mi watershed
27
1.1
0.6
1.9
7.2
2.0
1.1
0.8
Propachlor
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.4
Cyanazine
5.6
1.7
2.8
1.6
• For the severe runoff events of 1979
  (runoff total 120mm), runoff amounts
  from both row crop fields for each
  event were nearly identical, despite
  differences in timing and degree of
  tillage and in crop canopy.
• Surface runoff from the pasture was
  mostly snowmelt; runoff from rainfall
  occurred only during  intense rain
  storms.
• Flow from the whole watershed was
  roughly half subsurface flow and
  half surface runoff. Half  or more of
  the surface  runoff was snowmelt
  runoff.
• During extended high flows between
  surface runoff events, high instream
  IMOs-N  concentrations were very
  similar to those in monitored shallow
  subsurface tile drains, implying that
  much of the stream  flow at these
  times was  from the drains.  During
  low flow winter conditions, in-
  stream  NOs-N concentrations were
  much lower.
• For the  study  conditions of this
  watershed, the difference between
  concentrations of NOa-N, Cl and
  IDS in  subsurface flow  (measured
  in tile drainage water) and concen-
  trations in  field surface  runoff
  indicates that these data could  be
  used to predict the percentage of
  surface runoff in stream flow.
• Generally, sediment concentrations
  in  runoff from the soybean field
  (corn residue incorporated by mold-
  board plowing)  were appreciably
  greater  than for the corn field
  (disked soybean residue); however,
  the opposite was true when a chisel
  plow was used to incorporate the
  corn residue.
• For all rainfall-runoff events analyzed,
  as runoff flowed from  field to intra-
  basin station to the main channel,
  the sediment load decreased on a
  unit-area  basis. For snowmelt,
  however, field losses were less than
  stream losses on the  unit-area
  basis.
• In the long term, the stream channel
  is becoming deeper and  wider,
  thereby providing a source of sedi-
  ment.
• For rainfall-runoff from row-cropped
  fields not recently fertilized, NHi-N
  concentrations in runoff were less
  than  in precipitation because of
  extraction by adsorption  to the soil.
• Because of the large  volumes and
  the high NOa-N concentrations of
  subsurface drainage, NOs-N  losses
  from the watershed in stream flow

-------
 (1979 and 1980) averaged 25 kg/ha,
 28% of the applied N.
 Concentrations of PCu-P in winter
 surface runoff andsnowmeltfollow-
 ing fall  P application  to the  row-
 cropped fields without incorporation,
 were higher  by a factor of 10 to 15
 times than when P had not  been
 applied, although  losses were only
 about 1 kg/ha.
 Total  N and P concentrations in
 sediment in runoff samples increased
 as  the  sediment concentration
 decreased. The equation:  nutrient
 concentration = a (sediment concen-
 tration)"0, where a and b are empirical
 parameters, fitted the data quite
 well.
 The severe runoff-erosion events in
 1979 resulted in herbicide  field
 runoff losses as high as 7.2%,  most
 of which was with water for all four
 herbicides studied; maximum loss in
 1980 was 2.8%.  Losses from the
 whole watershed  were  less: a
 maximum of 2.0% in 1979 and 1.9%
 in 1980.
1 Chisel  plowing, by reducing runoff
 and erosion,  in 1980 reduced herbi-
 cide field runoff losses of alachlor to
 below those for the whole watershed
 (on  a  percent of applied basis);
 whereas in the previous four years
 of moldboard plowing, field alachlor
 losses were  greater.
1 Concern  for  (and modeling  of)
 pollutants transported with subsur-
 face drainage needs to be empha-
 sized, along with that  for surface
 runoff, in cases where volume of
 subsurface drainage is significant.
i The factors important in determining
 the effect of  recent tillage, including
 cultivation, on runoff volumes, and
 how this effect declines with time
 (or precipitation), need to be defined.
i Factors determining sediment deposi-
 tion within an agricultural watershed,
 which  is important in determining
 the sediment delivery, need to be
 quantified.
> The possibility that a  cycle exists
 whereby sediment  is  deposited in
 water courses during lesser events
 to be eroded during high flows, such
 as snowmelt, needs further study.
» Additional analyses of chemical-
 •sediment partitioning and  enrich-
 ment relative  to sediment  particle
 size should be performed.
> Better management systems for the
 increasing  amounts of nitrogen
 applied to crops need to be developed
 and implemented to decrease the
 environmental, as well as economic
  and energy  concerns associated
  with NOa-N leaching losses.
• The problems of chemical application
  with  conservation tillage (e.g.,
  incorporation of nutrients without
  incorporation of residue, or possible
  runoff and volatilization  losses of
  herbicides applied to crop residues)
  need to be  solved  to obtain the
  greatest benefits from this increas-
  ingly accepted practice.
H. P. Johnson and J. L. Baker are with Iowa State University. Ames. IA 50011.
C. N. Smith is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Field-to-Stream Transport of Agricultural Chem-
  icals and Sediment in an Iowa Watershed: Part II. Data Base for Model Testing
  (1979-1980)."(Order No. PB84-1 77419; Cost: $34.00. subject to change) will
  be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield. VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project  Officer can be contacted at:
        Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        College  Station Road
        Athens,  GA 30613

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
                                                               /i'UGJC'&S   !':.'••",,•£  !'                   S
                                                                           li3LV&-f  r----  :9-v?  V  T*
                                                                          /»   •••  /- ;  •"--• •-  -  '•,    4
                                                             •\.  r-.	-» .;-'.• > (.-.•:•..'£.•-••          .    '     X
                                                              ^v>^"..-i ;,V-,-'  .. .V •  ., ^-_.. -,  t   v        :^-( ,  -  ^
                                                                                                     U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984-759-102/965

-------