UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
' WASHiNGTON. D.C. 20460
Jl'i
program Guidance Memorandum
PG-53
Subject: Interim Guidance - Consulting Engineering Agreements -
Title II Construction Grant Program
From: Alvin L. Aim, Assistant-Administrator /
for Planj^jag.and Management (PM-208) '
Jafrjes''W'?ffgVe1^^Tstant Administrator
for Water and Hazardous Materials (WH-556)
To: Regional Administrators
Proposed subagreement regulations published in the Federal Register
on May 9, 1975, included provisions applicable to consulting engineering
agreements under EPA construction grants (principally proposed 40 CFR
35.937 through 35.937-11, at 40 F.R. 20303 through 20305). A notice was
published in the June 9, 1975 Federal Register to extend the comment
period upon these regulations to July 15, 1975.
It is anticipated that final regulations concerning the subject
of the May 9, 1975 proposed regulations will be published in
September 1975, with an effective date somewhat later. After promulga-
tion but prior to the effective date, a series of regional workshops
will be held. The purpose of these workshops will be to insure that
EPA personnel, consulting engineers, state and municipal personnel and
others will fully understand and properly apply the final subagreement
regulations and to assure minimum disruption to the program.
The purpose of this memorandum is to define EPA policy and procedures
concerning consulting engineering subagreements in the interim until
final subagreement regulations become effective. Program Guidance
Memorandum No. 42 dated October 23, 1974, and all other prior memos,
letters and guidance concerning this subject matter are superseded by
this memorandum.
-------
A, ACCESS TO RECORDS
(1) Existing EPA regulations require applicants/grantees and
their contractors including consulting engineers, to maintain, and
insure EPA access to, records pertinent to project performance. See 40
CFR I 35.935-7 of the February 11, 1974, final Title II construction grant
regulations and 40 CFR § I 30.605 and 30.805 of the final EPA general grant
regulations published at 40 F.R. 20242 and 20245 on May 8, 1975.
This access to records requirement is applicable (subject to the
policy and procedures set forth in Sec. B, below) to all Title II
construction grants, but action need not be taken to insert the
access to records clause in consulting engineering agreements under
Title II grants awarded prior to July 1, 1975.
(2) After June 30, 1975 a construction grant will not be awarded
nor will initiation of Step 1 work be approved pursuant to 40 CFR
1 35.917(e) or 35.925-18(a)(3), unless an acceptable access clause as
follows is included in the consulting engineering subagreement. This
requirement also pertains to Step 2 and Step 3 grant awards. This
requirement also pertains to completed Step 1 or Step 2 work not covered
by a grant award, if payment therefor is requested as a part of a
Step 3 grant award. Submission of consulting engineering subagreements
is required pursuant to 40 CFR § 35.920-3(a)(2) and 35.920-3{b)(7).
The following clause is the acceptable access to records
clause for insertion in all consulting engineering subagreements in
excess of $10,000:
"1. The (Contractor/Consulting Engineer) shall maintain
books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent
to performance on EPA grant work under this agreement in accordance
with accepted professional practice, appropriate accounting procedures
and practices, and 40 CFR § § 30.605, 30.805, and 35.935-7. The
United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Comptroller
General of the United States, the United States Department of Labor,
(the grantee-owner), and (the state water pollution control agency) or
any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access"to
such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of
inspection, audit and copying. The (Contractor/Consulting Engineer)
will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection.
2. The (Contractor/Consulting Engineer) agrees to include in
all his contracts and all tier subcontracts directly related to
project performance which are in excess of $10,000 the five items
of this clause.
-------
3. Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and formally
established audit regulations, procedures and guidelines of the
reviewing or audit agency(ies).
4. The (Contractor/Consulting Engineer) agrees to the
disclosure of all information and reports resulting from access
to records pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2, above, to any of the
agencies referred to in paragraph 1, above. In those cases where
the audit concerns the (contractor/consulting engineer), the auditing
•agency will afford the (contractor/consulting engineer) an opportunity
for an audit exit conference, and an opportunity to comment on the
pertinent portions of the draft audit report. The (contractor/
consulting engineer) will be provided copies of the formal draft
audit report at the time of its transmission. Such transmission
will include the written comments, if any, of the audited firm.
5. Records under paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be maintained
and made available during performance on EPA grant work under this
agreement and until three years from date of final EPA grant payment
for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any "Dispute"
appeal under an EPA grant agreement, or litigation, or the settlement
of claims arising out of such performance, or costs or items to which
an audit exception has been taken, shall be maintained and made available
until three years after the date of resolution of such appeal,
litigation, claim or exception".
An alternate clause may be approved only if it has been found acceptable
by the Regional Counsel.
(3) Exception for Step 3 Grant Awards. If amendment of an existing
consulting engineering agreement is not feasible prior to the'award of a
Step 3 grant, but amendment is assured in writing by a letter from the
consulting engineer, grant award may be made prior to such amendment.
In such .case, the grant agreement must include the following special
condition:
"This grant is awarded subject to compliance, within 90
days after the grant award or such additional extension of tinie~
as may be allowed in writing by the EPA Project Officer, with the
access to records requirements of 40 CFR 30.605, 30.805, and
35.935-7, in reliance upon the written assurance dated ( }
by (consulting engineer or firm). Consulting engineering work
performed under an agreement which does not include an acceptable
access to records clause will be ineligible. Accordingly, grant
payments will not be made for consulting engineering work until
the agreement under which such work has been or is being performed
includes an acceptable access to records clause."
-------
This exception should be utilized chiefly as an interim measure
to avoid unnecessary disruption of Step 3 grant awards for applications
presently filed in the EPA Regional Office.
B. EXERCISE OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO RECORDS
(1) EPA has a broad right of access to the grantees' consulting engineers'
records pertinent to performance of EPA project work. The extent
to which EPA will exercise this right of access will depend upon
the nature of the records and upon the type of agreement. In referring
to these records, it is important to bear in mind the following three
categories of records —
Category A: records pertaining directly to the professional,
technical and other services performed, excluding
any type of financial records of the consulting
engineer.
Category B: Financial records of the consulting engineer pertaining
to the direct costs of professional, technical and
other services performed, excluding financial records
pertaining to profit and overhead or other indirect costs,
Category C: Financial records of the consulting engineer excluded
from Category B.
(2) In all cases, EPA will exercise its right of access to Category A
records. Also, where there is an indication that fraud, gross abuse,
or corrupt practices may be involved, EPA will exercise its right of
access to records in all categories. Access to consulting engineers'
financial records (Category B and C) will depend principally upon the
method(s) of compensation stipulated in the agreement:
(a) Agreements Based Upon a Percentage of Construction Cost.
Category B and C records will not be audited. However, terms of the
agreement including the total amount of compensation will be evaluated
for fairness and reasonableness and consistency with historical and
advisory guidelines in general use and acceptable locally such as ASCE
Manual 45 or other analyses or data relied upon or utilized by the
contracting parties in negotiation of the agreement. Such evaluation
shall also consider comparable contracts for which EPA grants have been
awarded. Payment under a contract based upon a percentage of construction
cost must be based upon the consulting engineer's construction cost estimate
provided at the time of completion of plans and specs plus a reasonable
compensation for updating plans and specs, revising cost estimate, or
similar services. Where the low bid for construction is higher than
this estimate, payment for consulting engineering services may not be
increased, except for those services performed in the interim between
completion of plans and specs or award of the grant, and receipt of
the engineer's estimate, over and above those services contemplated
in the original consulting engineering agreement.
-------
(b) AgreementsBased Upon SalaryCostTimes a Multiplier,
Including Profit. Category B records wi11 be audited^Category C records
will not be audited. However, terms of the agreement, including the
multiplier, will be evaluated in accordance with appropriate portions of
paragraph 8(2)(a) above. Items of overhead or other indirect costs will only
be audited to the extent necessary to assure that types of costs found.
both in overhead and reimbursable direct costs, if any, are prdperly
charged.
(c) Per Diem Agreements. Category B records will be audited.
Category C records will not be audited. Audit will be performed to
the extent necessary to determine that hours claimed and classes
of personnel used were properly supported. The per diem rates
will be evaluated in accordance with appropriate portions of (2){a)
and (b) above.
(d) Cost Plus a Fixed Fee Payment (Compensation). All direct
costs and overhead and other indirect costs claimed will be audited
to determine that they are reasonable, allowable, and properly supported
by the consulting engineer's records. The amount of fixed fee will not be
questioned unless the total compensation appears unreasonable when
evaluated in accordance with (2)(a) and (b) above.
(e) Fixed Lump-Sum Contracts. Category B and C records
will not be audited. The contract amount will not be questioned unless
the total compensation appears unreasonable when evaluated in accordance
with appropriate portions of (2)(a) and (b) above.
(3) Under agreements covering both grant-eligible and ineligible
work, access to records will be exercised to the extent necessary to allocate
contract, work or costs between work grant-eligible for Title II construction
grant assistance and work or costs which are ineligible.
(4) Under agreements utilizing two or more methods of compensation,
each part of the agreement will be separately audited in accordance with
the appropriate subparagraph of (2) above.
(5) Any audited firm and the grantee will be afforded opportunity
for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment upon the
pertinent portions of the draft audit report. The audited firm and the
grantee will also be provided copies-of the formal draft audit report
at the time of its transmission. Such transmission will include the
written comments, if any, of the audited firms and the grantee in addition
to those of the appropriate state and/or Federal agency(ies).
-------
C. TRANSITION: CONTRACT TYPE
(1) The percentage of construction cost type of contract, and the
multiplier contract, where profit is included in the multiplier, may
not be utilized for Step 1 or Step 2 work initiated after July 1, 1975,
when the Step 1 or Step 2 grant is awarded subsequent to June 30, 1975.
(2) Step 1 and Step 2 work performed under the percentage of
construction cost type of contract and the multiplier contract, where
profit is included in the multiplier, will be reimbursed and such
contracts will not be questioned where such costs are reimbursed in
conjunction with a Step 3 grant award where Step 2 work has been initiated
prior to July 1, 1975 and the Step 3 grant is awarded before July 1, 1976.
(3) Where Step 2 work is initiated after July 1, 1975, under
contracts described in (1) and (2) .above, EPA approval may not be given or
grant assistance awarded until the -terms of compensation under the contract
have been renegotiated. It is recommended that the terms of compensation
under the contract be renegotiated as a lump-sum agreement where
the extent of work to be performed is reasonably ascertainable, (or as a
cost plus fixed fee payment type agreement where the extent of work to be
performed is not reasonably ascertainable).
(4) Establishing an "upset" figure (an upper limit which cannot
be exceeded without a formal amendment to the agreement) under a
multiplier contract, where profit is included in the multiplier, is
not acceptable where renegotiation. of such contracts is required. In
such renegotiation, the amount of profit must be specifically identified.
(5) Per diem agreements should be utilized only to a limited
extent, such as where the first task under a Step 1 grant involves
establishing the scope and cost of succeeding Step 1 tasks, for Step 3
services during construction, or for incidental services.
(6) Appendix A to this memorandum contains examples to serve as
guidance in the application of the foregoing requirements.
D. COST OR PRICE ANALYSIS
(1) EPA requirements concerning cost or price analysis are
contained in 40 CFR § 30.725. Guidance is being prepared concerning
such formal analysis for consulting engineering agreements. Until
such guidance has been distributed, no such formal analysis should
be undertaken.
(2) Until guidance has been distributed, the total contract
amount under any form of contract may be questioned in accordance with
(3) On all consulting engineering contracts in excess of $100,000
a certification may be required (see Appendix B).
-------
E. PAYMENT
Full and prompt payment should be made by EPA and by grantees
for eligible costs as work is completed under consulting engineering
contracts in accordance with 40 CFR § 35.945 (second sentence).
Grantees or their contractors should not withhold payment for professional
services unless it is determined that the professional service contractor
has failed to comply with contract objectives, terms, conditions, or
reporting requirements. Any withholding should be limited to only
that amount necessary to assure contract compliance.
F. ENFORCEMENT
Refusal by a consulting engineer to allow access to its records,
or to renegotiate a consulting engineering contract in accordance
with the foregoing requirements, will render costs incurred under such
contract ineligible. Accordingly, all such costs will be questioned
and disallowed pending access to records.
cc: Mr. Stringer, Director of Audit
-------
TRANSITION
CONSULTANT FEE BASED ON PERCENTAGE OF CONSTRUCTION COST
or
COST MULTIPLIER (WITH PROFIT AS PART OF MULTIPLIER)
A. GRANT OFFER MADE AND ACCEPTED
CASE
EPA POSITION
Case I
1. Step 1 Contract only.
2. Step 1 Work Underway or
being completed.
3. Progress or Final Payment
is Requested.
Case II
1. Step 2 Contract only.
2. Step 1 Complete.
3. Step 2 Underway or
being completed.
4. Progress or Final Payment is
Requested on Step 2.
Case III
.1. Combination Step 1, 2, &
"Supervision" 3 (or 1/2 or
2/3).
2. Work has not yet started on
2 (or 3).
3. Anticipate continued payment
requests.
Pay Requests thru Compl. Step 1
Case IV
1.
2.
3.
Previously Completed Step 2 Work.
Step 2 P&S "Shelved"
Step 2 Reactivated and only add'l
work by A/E is "updating" P&S etc.
(to allow Step 3 Grant request or
bidding) thereby resulting in
increased Constr. Cost and
increased (windfall) A/E
compensation.
Pay Requests thru Compl. Step 2
Pay requests for work on Step
currently underway. Advise
Grantee Fed. share will apply
only to Steps not underway where
compensation is not determined
as % of construction cost, or
cost multiplier.
Pay only compensation as determined
by Constr. Cost estimate at completion
of original work plus a "reasonable"
compensation for "updating" the
plans and specs, etc.
Appendix A (1)
-------
B. GRANT OFFER PENDING -- GRANTEE ALREADY HAS AS>E UNDER CONTRACT WITH
COMPENSATION BASED ON PERCENTAGE CONSTRUCTION COST OR COST MULTIPLIER
CASE
EPA POSITION
Ca.se I
1. No work started on Step 1,
or 2.
2. Grant Request Made
No grant until Grantee/Consultant
renegotiate Contract with compensation
based on other than % Constr. Cost,
or Cost Multiplier.
Case II
1. Work Started (or Compl.)
on Step 1
Case III
1. Work Started (or Compl.)
on Step 2
Case IV
1. Combination Step 1 and 2
(or 1, 2 & 3, etc.).
Award grant, continue current
contract and pay that basis.
Same as B. II above.
Same as A. Ill above.
Appendix A (2)
-------
CONTRACT PRICIMG PROPOSAL - EPA Grant Subagreement
EPA Grant Number: -«,.o. j ,,o.o, ,.*,.,*
*r»Mr Ol Ol * 1 MO*«
»ut'p|_iC » *.Ni>'on M.W v*c t* TO AC rvi«Ni*nto
,o,.,A-ov.ro,,.o,o», Step(S)
DETAIL DESCRIPTION OP COST ELEMENTS
>. DI'RECT MAT t BIAI.
.. pi,nCM.trnr-»..T>.
C. OTMI II .
ror/L r>!RKCr MATERIAL
2, U*T 1 Ml AL OVtRHt'AOJ «?»(» 1, A }&•••-)
3. DIRTCT LABOR (5t~tl!r)
f
/
£
jf\
* \
rorx^ DiKrcr L*KOK \
4. LARO1I OVtP.h£AO (Sptftly tfrr*r'n«nf or cofef ttgrrt)
j
/ I
\^f
TOTAL LA(i?S^i»l'rf:IICxn
nouns HOUR
;.::.•:::::::::;:::::"::::::::::•::::::••
O.H. RATC X BASE s
:•:.:•::::;::::•:.:. :::.|::::-;u::::::
s.»»rc»At partners bunng Kate:fHartnership Unly^
.... ..-^
\ /^
EST COJTW
":::-i»=ll:!:;!»:;-
EST
COST (1)
::r:::::::::::::.::::.
tST COST (1)
EST Cp&T f»
S*. V TOTAL fPl.CIAt. TES77WC r::::::::::::::-:-::::
*. SPfCIAl. rOUIPMCHT (Hd,,«l cWir.A \
7. TRAVIL (11 rfl.rcl .h.rf.J I 1 i
.. ».M,r.nT.i.»N < //
t. fC« OIIU OH tUBtllTCHCi: ^f"^
«. COHSULTAIITS f/dcnHI)- . r/£0, . -~\.I,J
/ !
4 /
X /
\/
. ror^L covsvi.rA.vTj
EST COST f*>
CST COST (*>
». OTHI'll dinliCT COSTS
w. TOTAL ntKi:cT co.tr AND offKiiFA.fi
II. CCHLItAL A«D ACIUINlSTHATIVE rX"CNSC (Ktlt 1* fl tuft rlrmrnl Nu-
ll. noyAi.Tirs
»• ror>tt cir/HATco cosr
u. ret on pnot'iT
i». Torxt rsriiuTii>cosTjurnrKr.onrHorir
TOTAL
£*T COST'
::::;;::!::;;::•:;::
;::::::iii:iv::i::
F:i:::i;;i;i:;;;::;
:::;:::::•:.•. :..
=:•=::=!:!!!;•••••:
:::::•••::::•;;•:••
':::::::'::'::'::•:•!
i;:::f.::':-ji.—
* •
HLLdQIiimt
teference
(Attach certification of current cost or pricing data)
M«.N*w»i (Contractor)
*•*'"• or '""* o»»ec» io»Mi»«on
i.trnricate of Kevit-w (Grantoo)
-------
CERTIFICATE OF CURRENT COST OR PRICING DATA****
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
cost or pricing data as defined in ( ) submitted,
either actually or by specific identification in writing to the
Contracting Officer of the Grantee or his representative in support of
* are accurate, complete, and
current as of **.
day month year
Firm_
Name
Title
***
Date of Execution
*Describe the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment or
other submission involved, giving appropriate identifying number
(e.g., RFP No. ).
**This date shall be the date when the price negotiations were
concluded and the contract price was agreed to. The respon-
sibility of the contractor is not limited by the personal
knowledge of the contractor's negotiator if the contractor
had information reasonably available at the time of agreement,
showing that the negotiated price is not based on accurate,
complete, and current data.
***This date should be as close as practicable to the date when the
price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was
agreed to.
****The contractor acknowledges the certification data is available
for EPA audit verification where such verification is deemed
appropriate. ^ „-•''
Appendix B (2)
-------
FY 1904 OWOGAS
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS ACTIVITIES 4, 6-9 BACKUP
COMPLCTIOriS/CLOSEOUTS
Step 1 Physical Completions and
Terminations
Completions
Terminations
Step 2 Physical Cortpletions and
Terminations
Ccrrpletions
Terminations
Step 3, Step 2+3, PL 84-660,
Physical Completions, and
Terminations
Cctnpletions
Terminations
Adrdnistrative Corpletions
fStep 3, Step 2+3 and PL 84-660}
-Will not be sent to DIG
(TN N8 coded NS)
-Awaiting Completion of Another
Segncnt of phase (TN N8 coded AP)
=Stcp 3, Step 2+3 and PL 84-660
Audit Requests
+Stcp 1 and/or Step 2 Audit Requests
over $250,000
•f Step 1 and or Step 2 Audit Requests
under $250,000
=Total Final Audit Requests
Project Closcouts (Stop 3, Step 2+3
iind PL 84-660)
1st 2nd 3rd 4-ch
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quejrter
af 40 tro bo
(A<} ( W ) ( 5* ) ( 5* )
( C ) ( /••))( 6 ) ( JL )
V // ^o a 7
( ^) ( // ) ( /? ) ( .^^}
( 0 ) ( r/ ) ( / ) ( o2 )
J? o ^
( / -? ) ( -3c% ) ( -Jj--) ( -?') )
( a 3s' qt
( 0 ) ( o ) ( / } ( / )
?! of Active"
Projects at
Beginning c:
FY-84
(27 Slvp 1 or r.l..>» ? :.•.•.:•':-. -•• !•• .-.:-.«• :
ilal.vi c-L.iu -jn. [\';j.
'.-*«'
-------
FY 1984 OWOGAS
CONSTRUCTION GRAI1TS ACTIVITIES 4, 6-9 BACKUP
COMPLUTIOHS/CLOSEOUTS
Step 1 Physical Completions and
Terminations
Completions *
Terminations
Step 2 Physical Corrpletions and
Terminations
Ccnpletions
Terminations
Step 3, Step 2+3, PL 84-660,
Physical Ccnpletions, and
Terminations
Conpletions
Terminations
Administrative Conpletions
(Step 3, Step 2+3 and PL 84-660)
-Will not be sent to OIG
(TN N8 coded NS)
-Awaiting Completion of Another
Segmsnt of phase (TN N8 coded AP)
=Stsp 3, Step 2+3 and PL 84-660
Audit Requests
+Step 1 and/or Step 2 Audit Requests
over $250,000
+Stcp 1 and or Step 2 Audit Requests
under $250,000
=Total Final Audit Requests
Project Closcouts (Step 3, Step 2+3
and PL 84-660)
1st
Quarter
6
7
3 )
2nd 3rd
Quarter Quarter
31 31
( o / ) ( 3? )
( O ) ( •
4th
{ CD )
( g ) ( la ) ( /< )
( o ) ( o ) ( o )
23
) ( SL ) ( v^ ) ( v.
( IB ) ( /?
) { 100 )
103 122.
IB
? of Active
Projects at
Spinning o:
FY-84
( Z )
**
-------
1C-6)
FY 1984 OWOGAS
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS ACTIVITY £5 IN ATTACHMENT B
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EVALUATION COMMITMENT
Region V -
Full/Extended CHE's*
States FY
Z-
2,
Total (Commitment) ___ ___ f^2L
* Projection does not include instructional CME's which are
expected to be performed on virtually all new construction
starts.
** Although the commitment is for the Regional fiscal year total
progress will be monitored quarterly. State estimates are
requested as backup information.
-------
(C-7)
FY 1984 OWOGAS
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS ACTIVITY #11 IN ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATION OVERVIEW IMPLEMENTATION COMMITMENT
Objective: Complete delegation to the States
Activity: Implement the Agency Policy on Delegation and
Overview for the- Construction Grants Program.
Date Regional Overview Policy Completed?
Policy Title:
Date Regional Overview Pol.icy Implemented* with the States (and
the Corps) :
States Date
1 y.-lTLu/AiP/'S _____ ____ jj '^|£c/ ____
2. ~
3 . yff ^H.^J _______ ____ LUL/.&/
4 • -J3lL±±l.Cl£l^t ________ _____ ' J-L5 JW.
5 . __pHj_q _____________ 3 |. IS" 1.83
7.
8.
C o ^P£_o£_§.n gineer s Uj_1L/JLl_
*"Implomented with the States" is defined as: (1) delegation
agreements revised to reflect Policy, (2) Regional delegation
management procedures revised to reflect the Policy, and (3)
overview program developed and in opprntion with tlio St^te in
(.yj-?:ti or.. For tin' T-c.-rr1.., "iwpl ••";. »•> <> v-lif
i ii;.: :;i" J L \ on ol Co:(:i j^')-i urni,ir,< i- i n-.0 t?:^ ovi-r v • Ov/ jM'.-'.j ra::is .
-------
FY 1984-1906 Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
FY
1984
TOTAL
FY
1985
TOTAL
FY
1986
TOTAL
Data
Step 1 Terminations. /
Step 1 Completions.
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2+3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards.
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions. 5" Q l&
* * *•• •iiiin«fc.in«3nf-iii»ii- ••. •». -•-. »•.• J. *mm *~* .in ,i|l , .„„.
Step 3 Construction Completions. LjL_ U—
Adinin. Completions (Step 3 & 2 + 3). £jl~f ?)~~~f
Final Constr Audit Completions(Step 3 & 2 + 3) L&2- /IZ1
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 & 2+3)
AT Reviews.
Corp_s_-Spe_£i f i c_Data
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears Q ^._.
Total Di_r_e_c_t Corps Workyears JS~5L_
Total Corps Expendi tures (jTh^^^^^^J ^l^tSO
Corps Workyear for Special Assignments
.33.. 3.?-
-------
FY 1984-193b Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
State
Region
project Workload Data
Step 1 Terminations.
Step 1 Completions.
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2+3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards.
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions.
Step 3 Construction Completions.
Ad:nin. Completions (Step 3 & 2+3).
Final Constr Audit Completions(Step 3 & 2 + 3)
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 5 2+3)
AT Reviews.
Corns- Speci f_i c Da^ta^
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears
Total Direct Corps Workyears
FY
1984
TOTAL
FY
1985
TOTAL
FY
1986
TOTAL
zo
Total Corps Expend! tures
Corps Workyear for Special Assignments
JL=L.
/
9
22.
/s
J
-------
FY 1984-1906 Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
Project Workload Data
Step 1 Terminations.
Step 1 Completions.
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2+3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards.
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions.
Step 3 Construction Completions.
Admin. Completions {Step 3 & 2+3).
Final Constr Audit Completions(Step 3 & 2+3)
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 & 2+3)
AT Re.views.
Corps-Speci f i c_Da_ta_
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears
Total £ir_e_ct Corps Workyears
Total Corps Expend i ture s CTKo^-SO-'naS^)
Corps Workyoar for Special Assignments
FY
1984
TOTAL
'.~33~-
FY
1985
TOTAL
~L<2-
-3£L
_.££_
FY
1986
TOTAL
15"
3&
___L _JL
.£_
JL5L
..SSL
_3^
-32.
3
15..
SO
-------
(D-2)
_
Region
FY 1984-1906 Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
FY
1984
TOTAL
FY
1985
TOTAL
FY
1986
TOTAL
Project Workload Data
Step 1 Terminations.
Step 1 Conpletions. QC)
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2+3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards. ~~/ HZ-
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions. /c3.,- /uL- __sL/
Step 3 Construction Completions. ^2T_ J*0
Adsnin. Completions (Step 3 & 2+3). __j£Q --2-Q
Final Constr Audit CompletionsfStep 3 & 2+3) f/_ (J_
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 & 2+3) __L3_ J?^T_
AT Reviews. ^3 3
Corp^-S P_££i_£i.c_p_ a t a
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears __s2.
Total Direct Corps Workyears ^7 tfjTl <3~~f
fm_ ^_ tl_ n _1f__^__ ' •* m_ii- ^ji _- - vJ^vl^ LIJ , 11 ff •" iT~ -m m •—.M
-------
FY 1984-198£i Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
(D-2)
D at a
Step 1 Terminations.
Step 1 Completions.
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2-1-3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards.
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions.
Step 3 Construction Completions.
Admin. Completions (Step 3 & 2+3).
Final Constr Audit Compl etions( Step 3 & 2+3)
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 & 2+3)
AT Reviews.
Corps-Speci f i c Data
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears
Total Di re_c_t Corps Workyears
Total Corps Expendi ture ^(T^OU^a^d^)
Corps Workyear for Special Assignments
FY
1984
TOTAL
UL
-30.
jL
JL.
FY
1985
TOTAL
_9L
IP.
J3S.
FY
1986
TOTAL
. 30
to
n
30
J3A.
l^co fezo
-------
(0-2)
m*jofao/g3
c *.. * ;f~virrv-*—r—^—*—
YI/X^^^OTT.S/ZZ
P\egion f~_i\/&.,___ _
FY 1984-1986 Workload Projections
Requested From The Regions
For Each State
FY FY FY
1984 1985 1986
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
Project W o r ic 1 oaid D a t a
Step 1 Terminations. -^"lC3—;_ ~~Q-~~L ~—Q —
Step 1 Completions. ^4 I
Step 2 Completions.
Step 2+3 Awards.
Step 2+3, Design Portion Completions.
Step 3 Awards.
Step 2+3 Construction Portion Completions.
Step 3 Construction Completions.
Admin. Completions (Step 3 & 2+3).
Final Constr Audit Compl etions ( Step 3 & 2+3) __/j6__ /5~_
Construction Project Closeouts (Step 3 & 2+3) /_^__ /..?_
AT Reviews. / Q _ jQ
Corps^Speci fi c_Data
On-Site Presence Corps Workyears
Total OIL6.0! Corps Workyears
Total Corps Expendi ture^(^TnO(Ji&(3t^\^J £inQ. £J2_, J^Z.2.
Corps Workycar for Special Assignments
J53. .1^7- 1^7-
------- |