November 1986
EPA-700 8-87-004
(sb)
Hazardous Waste
Task Fo
Evaluation of American
MUton, Fl
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Florida Department of En
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOUS WASTE GROUND-WATER TASK FORCE
GROUND-WATER MONITORING EVALUATION
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
Milton, Florida
March, 1986
Donald R. Hunter
Project Coordinator
Region IV, USEPA, Environmental Services Division
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
Background 2
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 2
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS 3
Inadequate Hydrogeological Characterization 3
Invalid Ground Water Flow Direction Determination and Improper
Monitoring System... 3
Failure to Address Effects of Clay Lenses 3
Inadequate Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan 4
Failure to Prepare a Ground Water Quality Assessment Program
Outline 4
Failure to Implement a Ground Water Quality Assessment Program 4
Laboratory Evaluation 4
Monitoring Data Analysis 5
TECHNICAL REPORT 6
INVESTIGATIVE METHODS 6
Records/Documents Review and Evaluation 6
Facility Inspection 6
Laboratory Evaluation 6
Ground Water, Leachate and Leak Detection Sump
Sampling and Analysis 7
WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS 7
Non-Hazardous Waste 7
RCRA Wastestream... .. 8
RCRA Surface Impoundment Description 9
REGIONAL GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY 9
SITE HYDROGEOLOGY 10
GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM 12
Regulatory Requirements 12
RCRA Ground Water Monitoring System 13
Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan 15
Ground Water Quality Assessment 18
-------
Page
TASK FORCE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND HANDLING PROCEDURES
18
LABORATORY EVALUATIONS
20
MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS
22
REFERENCES
26
APPENDICES
A - COMPLETE TASK FORCE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
B - DESIGN DRAWING, DEEP WELL EQUALIZATION BASIN
C - HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION
D - HYDROLOGIC GRAPH, WATER LEVELS IN RCRA WELLS
AND PROCESS WELL No. 4
E - STATISTICAL COMPARISONS, GROUND WATER DATA
F - STATE MEMO REGARDING GROUND WATER DATA
G - STUDENT'S t-TEST FOR ACRYLONITRILE
H - CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING CONTAMINANT SOURCE AT RCRA BASIN
I - SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
J - LABORATORY REVIEW
FIGURES
1 - Facility Location Map
2 - Site Diagram and Sample Location Map
3 - Solid Waste Disposal Scheme
4 - Geologic Gross Section
5 - Regional Hydrogeologic Units
6 - Typical RCRA Monitoring Well
7 - Water Level/Screened Interval Relationships
TABLES
1 - Sampling Station Locations and Descriptions
2 - Surface Impoundment Influent Wastewater Analyses
3 - Sample Containers
4 - RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Parameters
5 - Frequency and Replication of Sampling
6 - RCRA Well Construction Data
7 - Analytical Data Summary, RCRA Basin Area
8 - Analytical Data Summary, Solid Waste Management Area
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-------
GROUND WATER MONITORING COMPLIANCE EVALUATION
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
SANTA ROSA PLANT
MILTON, FLORIDA
ESD PROJECT #86-191
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Task Force Effort
Operations at hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal (TSD) facili-
ties are regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA P.L.
94-580). Regulations promulgated pursuant to RCRA (40 CFR Parts 260 through
265, effective on November 19, 1980 and subsequently modified) address hazard-
ous waste site operations including monitoring of ground water to ensure that
hazardous waste constituents are not released to the environment. The regula-
tions for TSD facilities are implemented (for EPA administered programs) through
the hazardous waste permit program outlined in 40 CFR Part 270.
The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established
a Hazardous Waste Ground Water Task Force (Task Force) to evaluate the level of
compliance with ground water monitoring requirements at commercial off-site and
selected on-site TSD facilities and address the cause of non-compliance. The
Task Force is comprised of personnel from EPA Headquarters Core Team, Regional
Offices and the States.
There will be eight Task Force evaluations conducted in Region IV during
FY-86 and FY-87. One of these evaluations has been conducted at one of the
region's two off-site commercial facilities; the other off-site commercial
facility will be evaluated during the fourth quarter FY-86. The first private
on-site evaluation was conducted at the American Cyanamid Company facility at
Milton, Florida during March 2-7, 1986.
Objectives of the Evaluation
The principal objective of the inspection at American Cyanamid was to deter-
mine compliance of the RCRA surface impoundment (impoundment) with the require-
ments of 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F - Ground Water Monitoring and to determine
compliance with related requirements of the Part 265 interim status regulations
and the state's counterpart regulations. The ground water monitoring program
described in the RCRA Part B permit application was also evaluated for com-
pliance with Part 270.14(c) and potential compliance with Part 264. Recent
amendments to RCRA require that facilities seeking a RCRA permit also address
solid waste management units at the facilities, therefore, ground water moni-
toring wells and the leachate collection system associated with the solid waste
management units at the facility were sampled to provide data and Information
to be used during the permit review process.
The American Cyanamid Company inspection was coordinated by the Region IV
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Environmental Services
Division and included participation by the EPA Headquarters Core Team, Region
IV EPA Waste Management Division, and the Florida Department of Environmental
-------
-2-
Regulation, Northwest Florida District Office (Pensacola). In general, the
evaluation consisted of a review of state, federal, and facility records, a
facility inspection, evaluation of on—site and off—site laboratories and ground
water and leachate sampling and analysis.
BACKGROUND
Locale/General
The American Cyanamid Company Santa Rosa Plant is owned and operated by
the American Cyanamid Company of Wayne, New Jersey. It is located approxi-
mately 6.5 miles southwest of Milton in Santa Rosa County, Florida. The site
location is indicated in Figure 1.
The facility (see Figure 2), has RCRA interim status (EPA I.D. #FLD057-
231821). On July 15, 1985 a RCRA Part B permit application was submitted to
the State of Florida, which has final RCRA authorization for permit issuance.
This application is currently under review.
The Santa Rosa Plant produces acrylic fiber from monomeric acrylonitrile.
The monomer is polymerized in reactors and blenders and formed into fibers by
forcing the polymer and solvent "dope" through spinnerets. Further .processing
involves washing, dying, stretching, heating, drying, crimping, and bailing the
fibers (1).
Three broad categories of waste are generated by fiber and chemical manu-
facturing processes at the facility. Two of these, the solid, landfillable
waste and Weak Wastewater wastestream, are not hazardous as defined by RCRA.
The other, the Strong Wastewater wastestream, is considered a RCRA hazardous
waste because it has the characteristic of RCRA corrosive waste (pH <2 or
>12.5). The RCRA waste management unit is the Deep Well Equalization Basin,
where neutralization of the occasionally RCRA corrosive Strong Wastewater
wastestream occurs. This waste is ultimately disposed via deep well injection.
(2)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Task Force investigated the interim status ground water monitoring
program Implemented by American Cyanamid Company. The consensus opinion of
the Task Force was that this program is not in compliance with 40 CFR Part 265,
Subpart F, and the States counterpart regulations, Chapter 17-30.18, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
This investigation revealed that two Subpart F ground water monitoring
programs have been implemented since November 19, 1981. The basis for changing
the original program was a perception by American Cyanamid Company that the
originally evaluated ground water flow directions were incorrect. This change
resulted in redesignation of the three original downgradient wells as additional
upgradient wells and the designation of Process Well No. 4 as the single down-
gradient well. For reasons described fully in this report, these designations
are invalid.
-------
-3-
The investigation also revealed inadequacies in the areas of hydrogeologic
characterization and the facility sampling and analysis plan, a failure to
address the effects of clay lenses on shallow ground water flow, failure to
prepare a ground water quality assessment plan outline, and failure to imple-
ment a ground water quality assessment program.
Analytical results of ground water samples collected from the RCRA moni-
toring system indicate that leakage from the RCRA Deep Well Equalization Basin
has contaminated ground water at the facility. The data also show that the
non-regulated solid waste management units in the western portion of the faci-
lity (See Figure 2) are also affecting ground water quality.
The following is a more detailed summary of the inspection findings and
conclusions.
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS
Inadequate Hydrogeological Characterization (Rule 17-30.18(2) Part 265.91)
American Cyanamid has not adequately characterized the hydrogeology of
the site. The company has assumed, based on less than conclusive evidence,
that the entire site is underlain by an 80-foot thick clay unit referred to
as the Principal Low Permeability Zone (PLPZ). Conclusive evidence supporting
this characterization is imperative if the saturated zone monitored by the
company is to be considered appropriate. Additional work, including borings,
geotechnical evaluations, and pump test, is needed to develop the hydrogeo-
logical and geotechnical information needed to confirm the presence of the
PLPZ and its ability to act as a confining unit.
Invalid Ground Water Flow Direction Determination and Improper Monitoring
System (Rule 17-30.18(2) Part 265.91)
American Cyanamid has erroneously concluded that Process Well No. A is
hydraulically downgradient of their RCRA regulated unit. Process Well No. A
was designated the sole downgradient well and all other monitoring wells were
designated as upgradient wells. The original designations - Well No. 19 upgra-
dient and Wells No. 20, 21, and 22 downgradient - are the appropriate designa-
tions. The process well is screened in a different water bearing zone and
should not be included in the RCRA ground water monitoring system.
Failure to Address Effects of Clay Lenses (Rule 17-30.18(2) Part 265.91)
Existing geotechnical data indicate the presence of clay lenses in the
immediate area of the Deep Well Equalization Basin. The permeability contrast
and the location of these lenses within the Sand and Gravel Aquifer are such
that they could provide pathways of contaminant flow that would not be detected
by the existing ground water monitoring system. The ground water assessment,
discussed in the following paragraphs, must address this deficiency.
-------
_4-
Inadequate Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) (Rule 17-30.18(2)
Part 265.92)
The SAP does not fully comply with the requirements of Part 265.92(a) and,
in general, lacks the necessary specificity. The following areas must be
addressed to correct the plan:
- Develop procedures to determine standard, uniform purge volumes and
purge adequacy at each well.
- Develop and include in the SAP thorough, specific sample collection
and handling procedures.
- Change containers used to collect phenol and TOX samples.
- Immediately begin field preservation of all samples for which preser-
vation is required.
- Include references for all current and past analytical procedures used
in the analyses of RCRA parameters.
Failure to Prepare a Ground Water Quality Assessment Program Outline
(Rule 17-30.18(2) Part 265.93)
American Cyanamid could not provide a copy of this outline, which should
have been prepared by November 19, 1981. Lack of this outline results in non-
compliance with respect to Part 265.93(a).
Failure to Implement a Ground Water Quality Assessment Program
(Rule 17-30.18(2) Part 265.93)
American Cyanamid has not implemented a ground water quality assessment
program, as required by Part 265.93(d), even though statistical comparisons of
RCRA parameters and waste constituent data indicate ground water contamination
resulting from impoundment leakage has occurred. American Cyanamid contends
the contamination is the result of a spill of non-regulated material.
This program should address the issue of well construction and materials,
screened interval locations (i.e., the possible need for multi-level monitor-
ing), and the effects of clay lenses on perched ground water paths. The pro-
gram, when implemented, should be capable of determining the:
o Waste constituents present in the plume
o Rate of movement of the plume, and
o Horizontal and vertical extent of the plume
Laboratory Evaluation
The facility appears to be providing acceptable quality data for all
parameters except phenol and trace metals (copper, iron, manganese and zinc).
Deficiencies noted for the atomic absorption unit would cause the reliability
of some of the trace metals data to be questionable. Because plastic con-
tainers were used to collect the phenol samples, these data are also unreliable.
-------
-5-
Monitoring Data Analysis
All data from analysis of samples collected during this evaluation was
evaluated and considered useable except for mercury results.
A review of this data indicates ground water degradation has occurred
both in the RCRA and solid waste management areas. The degradation associated
with the RCRA Deep Well Equalization Basin is significant and is primarily
organic in nature. In order of increasing concentration, chloroform, tetrach-
loroethene, and carbon tetrachloride were detected in wells MW-21 and MW-22.
Extractable organic compounds were also detected in these samples.
The degradation at the SWMA is predominantly inorganic. Various metals
such as arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper and lead were detected in
ground water and leachate samples. Either their clear presence or the concen-
trations at which they were detected suggest they are either not naturally
occurring or are present above background concentrations in this area.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT
-------
-6-
TECHNICAL REPORT
INVESTIGATIVE METHODS
The Task Force evaluation of American Cyanamid consisted of:
o A review and evaluation of records and documents from EPA Region IV,
FL-DER, and American Cyanamid.
o A facility on-site inspection conducted March 2-7, 1986.
o On-site and off-site analytical laboratory evaluations.
o Sampling and subsequent analysis and data evaluation for selected ground
water monitoring wells, the leak detection system at the Deep Well
* Equalization Basin, and the leachate sump at the Upper Landfill/New
Pond.
Records/Documents Review and Evaluation
Records and documents from EPA Region IV and the FL-DER office, compiled by
an EPA contractor, were reviewed prior to the inspection. On-site facility re-
cords were reviewed to verify information currently in government files and to
supplement this information where necessary. This review was used to facilitate
evaluation of facility operations, waste management unit contruction and ground
water monitoring activities.
Specific documents and records reviewed and evaluated included the ground-
water sampling and analysis plan, analytical results from past groundwater
sampling, monitoring well construction data and logs, site geologic reports,
site operational plans, and unit design and operational reports.
Facility Inspection
The facility inspection, conducted March 2-7, 1986, Included identification
of waste management units, both solid and hazardous, history of disposal activi-
ties, and verification of location of groundwater monitoring wells and waste man-
agement areas.
Company representatives were interviewed to identify records and documents
and explain (1) facility operations (past and present), (2) site hydrogeology,
(3) groundwater monitoring system rationale, (A) the groundwater sampling and
analysis plan, and (5) laboratory procedures for obtaining data on groundwater
quality. Because groundwater samples were analyzed, in part, by an off-site
laboratory, personnel from these facilities were also interviewed regarding
sample handling and analysis, and document control.
Laboratory Evaluation
The on-site and off-site laboratory facilities handling groundwater samples
were evaluated regarding their respective responsibilities under the American
Cyanamid sampling and analysis plan. Analytical equipment and methods, quality
assurance procedures and documentation were examined for adequacy. Laboratory
-------
-7-
records were inspected for completeness, accuracy and compliance with state
and federal requirements. The ability of each laboratory to produce quality
data for the required analysis was evaluated.
Groundwater, Leachate and Leak Detection Sump Sampling and Analysis
Sampling Locations
Twelve samples were collected at the American Cyanamid facility during the
Task. Force inspection. Six samples, five groundwater and one aqueous leak
detection system sample, were collected in the vicinity of the RCRA Deep Well
Equalization Basin. Six samples, five groundwater and one leachate, were
collected at locations upgradient and downgradient of the nonhazardous indus-
trial waste disposal area. These locations are identified in Figure 2 and are
described in Table 1.
Samples were taken by the EPA contractor and sent to EPA contract lab-
oratories for analysis. Splits of all samples were offered to and accepted
by American Cyanamid. EPA Region IV requested and received four splits. The
FL-DER did not request splits of any samples. Data from analyses of samples
were reviewed to further evaluate the American Cyanamid groundwater monitoring
program and identify possible contaminants in groundwater. Analytical results
from the samples collected for the Task Force are presented in Appendix A.
WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
This portion of the report describes the design, construction and operation
of waste disposal units and waste disposal practices at the American Cyanamid
Company facility at Milton, Florida. This discussion is presented to provide
a framework for assessing waste disposal unit integrity (both for solid and
hazardous waste units), to explain the types and placement of wastes disposed
by American Cyanamid Company and to serve as a reference to assist in evaluating
potential and existing groundwater contamination.
Non-Hazardous Waste
Descriptions of the non-hazardous or solid waste management areas (SWMA)
and discussions of data from analyses of ground water samples collected at the
SWMA are included in this report to provide information with regard to the
HSWA amendments which require permit applicants to address solid waste manage-
ment areas which may have releases to the environment. This information should
be evaluated by the permit writer to determine the need to require further work
on the part of American Cyanamid in fulfilling the RCRA Part B requirements.
Landfillable solids - These wastes have been generated since the beginn-
ing of plant operations in 1958 and were initially characterized as either
burnable or nonburnable. Wood, trash, and dry waste fiber were considered
burnable; wet fiber, darco-hyflo solids, waste dope, crumb, wet gel and
filter press media were considered nonburnable. Figure 3 contains a flow
diagram depicting the origin and disposition of these waste. The burnable
waste was disposed in the burnable waste pit (Figure 2) until 1971. The
nonburnable waste was disposed in the Lower Disposal Area (Figure 2) until
1969, when the Upper Landfill opened. Since 1971, all nonhazardous land-
fillable solids have been placed in the Upper Landfill*
-------
-8-
None of these disposal areas are lined. All pits or trenches were created
by excavating the insitu materials, as needed, to accommodate the waste. A
vegetative cover is placed over portions of the Upper Landfill as they are
closed. After closure of the Lower Disposal Area, a pond was constructed on
top of the landfill by raising the berm above the cap elevation to impound and
contain runoff and rainwater. Leachate draining from the Upper Landfill is
impounded behind a dike to form the New Pond (Figure 2). Prior to 1982, this
leachate was allowed to escape into the marshy wetlands between the disposal
area and Escambia Bay.
Weak Wastewater - This wastewater constitutes the remaining non-hazardous
wastestream at the facility. The primary constituents of the stream are the
facility's utilities wastewater, evaporator condensate, relaxation and stretch
process wastewater from fiber manufacturing, stormwater from all manufacturing
areas except the polymer manufacturing reactor area, and leachate from the
Upper Landfill/New Pond area.
The Weak Wastewater Treatment plant (Figure 2) consist of a series of
three impoundments, identified as Pond's A, B and C, a chlorine contact chamber
and a nutrient mixing feed system. Pond A was built in 1958, has a surface
area of four acreas and is lined with fabric and tar. Pond B was put into
operation in 1966, also has a surface area of four acres and is unlined. It
was, however, completed with its base excavated into dense clay. Pond C was
put into operation in 1978, has a surface area of six acres and is lined with
l"-2" of asphalt, over which was placed 12" of sand and clay as a protective
layer. Ponds A and B are aerated. Pond C is a baffled oxidation/polishing
pond.
Treated wastewater is either discharged into Escambia Bay under NPDES
Permit No. I 057-37961 or is applied to the adjacent 70 acre spray irrigation
field. The amount of wastewater applied to the field usually varies between
20-80% of the total volume of treated wastewater. The actual rate depends
on the NPDES discharge volumes and weather. The spray field was placed into
service in 1977 and was designed to operate with an application rate of 3"
per acre per week.
RCRA Wastestream
The RCRA regulated waste stream is known as the Strong Wastewater Stream.
The "Strong" Wastewater Stream has been defined as hazardous because it exhi-
bits the characteristic of corrosivity (pH 2.0 or pH 12.5). These wastes
have been designated with EPA Hazardous Waste Number D002 in accordance with
40 CFR 261.22. This waste stream Is pumped to the RCRA regulated surface
impoundment.
The hazardous constituents in the strong wastewater stream are sulfuric
acid and sodium hydroxide from ion exchange regeneration. The ion exchange
process is used to provide demineralized process and boiler feed water for the
Santa Rosa Plant. The wastewater also contains other process wastes that are
not subject to regulation to RCRA. Additional information is contained in
Table 1.
-------
-9-
The corrosive waste is rendered non-hazardous by auto-neutralization upon
discharge to the surface impoundment. The large volume of water and presence
of inorganic salts in the impoundment buffers the waste to a pH in the range
not defined as corrosive in 40 CFR 261.22. This has been' documented by pH
analyses on grab samples taken directly from the surface impoundment and by
analyses of the surface impoundment effluent.
RCRA Surface Impoundment Description
The surface impoundment is located southeast of and contiguous to the
main plant site (Figure 2). The surface impoundment functions as a flow
equalization basin for the Strong Wastewater Treatment Plant, a facility
subject to FL-DER permit number 1057-38262. The strong wastewater is pumped
to the approximately 5.8 million-gallon capacity impoundment where it is
mixed by three low speed aerators. After a detention time of approximately
three to five days, the wastewater is pumped to the Strong Wastewater Treatment
Plant and subjected to coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disposal.
The impoundment was constructed in 1974 and has operated since May 1975.
It was built by excavating below grade, with finished contours established to
prevent stormwater run-on, and a single synthetic liner for leak control. In
February 1984, a double synthetic liner and leachate detection system was
completed and placed into operation. A design drawing for the impoundment is
included as Appendix B.
During the period the impoundment has been in service, there have been
two incidences of leakage. On October 13, 1983 a leak was detected which
resulted from a failed seam. The contents of the impoundment were removed and
a repair was affected. Later, on September 7, 1984, after the impoundment had
been retrofitted with a double liner system, an aerator tipped over and
presumably damaged both liners. The aerators and impoundment contents were
removed and the liners repaired.
REGIONAL GE0L0GY/HYDR0GE0L0GY
The American Cyanamid Company facility is located in the Gulf Coastal
Lowlands physiographic province which is a subdivision of the broader regional
physiographic feature, the Gulf Coastal Plain. The panhandle of Florida,
where Santa Rosa County is located, is underlain by a thick sequence of
generally unconsolidated Tertiary sedimentary formations (3, 4, 5). The
formations of interest in this sequence are, in descending order, the Pleisto-
cene marine terrace deposits, the Late Pliocene Citronelle Formation, the
undifferentiated Middle and Upper Miocene coarse elastics and associated
Pensacola Clay, the Lower Miocene-Upper Oligocene Tampa Limestone, the Middle
Oligocene Buccatuna Clay, and the Eocene Ocala Limestone. Sharp and sudden
fades change occur within the Middle and Upper Miocene clays and coarse
elastics (6). Although the thickness of other formations in the sequence
varies laterally, there are generally no sharp facies changes like those
described in the Miocene deposits. Figure 4 shows these relationships in a
geologic cross section (C-C*) across Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties. This
cross section depicts the described sequence approximately five miles north-
west of the American Cyanamid Company. The facility is located near one of
the sharp transition zones in the upper Miocene. At or near the facility and
to the northeast, the upper member of the Pensacola Clay disappears and is
replaced by a sequence of coarse elastics.
-------
-10-
The previously described formations can be grouped into several regional-
ly significant hydrologeologic units. The Pleistocene terrace deposits, the
Citronelle Formation, and the coarse clastic facies of the Upper Miocene are
collectively referred to as the Sand and Gravel Aquifer. The fSand and Gravel
Aquifer is underlain throughout much of the area by the upper member and/or the
lower member of the Pensacola Clay, the aquitard which isolates the Sand and
Gravel Aquifer from the underlying Floridan Aquifer. The Floridan Aquifer
consists of two separate water bearing formations, the Tampa Limestone and the
Ocala Limestone, which are themselves separated by a continuous aquitard, the
Buccatuna Clay.
Figure 5 is a generalized geologic column showing the vertical distribu-
tion of these hydrogeologic units at the American Cyanamid Company site (7).
All of the company's RCRA ground water monitoring efforts are concentrated in
the upper portion of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer.
The aquifers in the western panhandle are replinished by local rainfall,
subsurface water movement from updip and surface water moving into the area.
The Sand and Gravel Aquifer, which covers the entire district, accepts water
from rainfall freely; however, because of numerous clay lenses and high clay
content of some of the sands, little vertical movement of a large scale is
possible. The Floridan Aquifer accepts recharge from the overlying Sand and
Gravel Aquifer, as well as recharge near the surface further updip.
Aquifer discharge occurs naturally as springs and ground water withdrawal
by pumping in both aquifers. Ground water in the Sand and Gravel Aquifer
occurs under both artesian and water table conditions (5).
SITE HYDR0GE0L0GY
Hydrogeologic Units
In the vicinity of Milton, Florida, the Sand and Gravel Aquifer is more
lithologically diverse than the name implies. Numerous logs of borings and
wells completed deep into this aquifer indicate that clay or predominantly
clay zones are not only present but are even quite common in the aquifer.
Based on these borings, most of the clay formations do not appear to be
laterally continuous and appear to occur at varying depths. One formation,
identified in site geological reports prepared for American Cyanamid Company
as the Principal Low Permeability Zone (PLPZ), does appear to be laterally
continuous in the vicinity of American Cyanamid. Although the top and bottom
of the PLPZ are not well defined, the thickness of the PLPZ is estimated to
be approximately 80 feet. There is little data to support conclusively that
the PLPZ extends south to or beyond Escambia Bay. Several new monitoring
wells installed at the landfill area penetrate what appears to be the top of a
clay zone of unknown thickness at an elevation consistent with the top of the
PLPZ. The hydrogeologic cross section provided by American Cyanamid for this
Part B is included as Appendix C (1).
Distinctly different water bearing zones appear to exist above and below
the PLPZ. Water levels measured in ground water monitoring wells installed
in the vicinity of the Deep Well Equalization Basin and above the PLPZ indi-
cate a distinct water table, the surface of which is approximately 40 feet
above the assumed upper surface of the PLPZ. Facility information places the
top of the production zone of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer at or below the
assumed base of the PLPZ.
-------
-11-
Appendix D shows a graphical representation of water levels measured
over time in the RCRA monitoring wells, which are screened above the PLPZ,
and in Process Well No. 4, which is screened in the production zone below the
PLPZ. This graph shows that there is no apparent effect on water levels in
the zone above the PLPZ by ground water withdrawal from the production zone.
Although not conclusive, this data does appear to indicate that the PLPZ
acts, to some degree, as a confining unit separating the two different water
bearing zones.
Adequacy of Hydrogeologic Characterization
The major sources of hydrogeologic information pertaining to the American
Cyanamid Company facility are the facility RCRA Part B and the facility Ground
Water Monitoring Plan, (both of which contained essentially the same infor-
mation), a collection of deep well geophysical data, and a U.S.G.S. paper,
"Data on Subsurface Storage of Liquid Waste Near Pensacola, Florida, 1963-
1980." Collectively, these sources address the hydrogeology in a general and
sketchy manner and do not present any real data on the physical properties of
the aquifers and associated confining units (i.e. vertical and horizontal
hydraulic conductivities, detailed lithology and stratigraphy). It is the con-
sensus opinion of the Task Force that American Cyanamid has not fully charac-
terized the hydrogeology of the site, and that the following steps should be
taken by the facility to provide the necessary data to resolve the hydrogeolo-
gic issues:
1. Conduct two additional borings for the purpose of defining site lithology
and obtaining samples for hydraulic property analysis.
a. Boring near process well #4 which would extend into but not through
the PLPZ located at approximately -10 to -90 feet NGVD. Take a
representative shelby tube sample of the first (unconfined) aquifer
and the PLPZ for permeability analysis. Install an appropriate
monitor well with at least a 15 foot screen.
b. Boring approximately 880 feet east of SI No. 1 which would extend
through the PLPZ. Take a representative shelby tube sample of the
PLPZ for permeability analysis.
2. Correlate lithology and permeability results with data from the new
wells MW-23 and MW-24 located south of the landfill area.
3. Conduct an adequate pump test for process well #4 using the new well
(l.a. above), other suitable existing wells or an additional peizometer
appropriately located. This should be done after static aquifer condi-
tions are obtained. The pumping rate should be constant over a sustained
period of time. Water levels of all RCRA wells should also be measured
during this test.
4. Any other boring as may be deemed necessary to supplement the data from
the above specified borings so that the site hydrogeology can be ade-
quately characterized should be constructed.
-------
-12-
Ground Water Flow
There has not been any extensive, site-specific effort to determine
ground water flow directions at the American Cyanamid facility. Water level
data for the unconfined portion of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer (i.e., the
saturated zone above the PLPZ) has been collected at only two fairly localized
and geographically separate areas of the facility. One of the areas is the
RCRA Deep Well Equalization Basin area in the eastern portion of the site.
Water levels measured at this area consistently indicate a nearly horizontal
water table, with no clear indication as to the flow direction of ground
water.
The other area is the solid waste management area in the wetlands area
along Escambia Bay. Because of the numerous streams and springs and the
proximity to the bay, this area is obviously a ground water discharge area.
It appears, based on these observations, that ground water, particularly
in the unconfined aquifer above the PLPZ and most likely in the production
zone below it, flows from the northeast portion of the site to the southwest,
ultimately discharging into Escambia Bay. Topographic relationships indicate
that in the immediate vicinity of the RCRA unit, ground water flow may be
predominantly to the south, roughly perpendicular to the east-west topographic
break immediately south of the main plant area.
American Cyanamid contends that the cone of influence resulting from
the pumping of Process Well No. 4, located adjacent to the Deep Well Equali-
zation Basin, extends through the PLPZ into the shallow unconfined portion
of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer. This influence would, in American Cyanamid'5
thinking, have an effect on the flow direction of ground water in this por-
tion of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer.
The data submitted to the Task Force during the evaluation does not
support these conclusions. The following steps should be taken to resolve
these Issues:
1. Evaluate data from the pump test described in Number 3 above.
2. Compare water elevations from the site wells within the unconfined
portion of the Sand and Gravel Aquifer to assess site-wide ground
water flow patterns.
GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
Regulatory Requirements
Chapter 17-4, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Ground water monitoring at the solid waste management areas (sprayfield,
lagoons A, B, and C, upper landfill, new pond, closed lower dump and closed
burn pit) is conducted to meet the requirements of Chapter 17-4 (F.A.C.).
These regulations impose the requirements for non-RCRA industrial solid waste
management areas. Approximately twenty monitoring wells have been installed
throughout the western portion of the site to monitor water quality upgradient
and downgradient of the disposal area.
-------
-13-
Chapter 17-30, 180 (F.A.C.)
The RCRA ground water monitoring program for the Deep Well Equalization
Basin was implemented to meet the requirements of Chapter 17-30.180 (F.A.C.)
Through these regulations, the State of Florida adopted 40 CFR Parts 260-266,
including 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F, the federal requirement for ground
water monitoring at RCRA facilities.
RCRA Ground Water Monitoring System
American Cyanamid has conducted RCRA ground water monitoring at the Deep
Well Equalization Basin according to two different perceived ground water flow
situations. Initially, a program was implemented which consisted of one up-
gradient well (Well No. 19) and three downgradient wells (Wells No. 20, No. 21,
and No. 22) (see Figure 2). At this time, however, American Cyanamid is con-
tending that their system consists of four upgradient wells and one downgradient
well. They have now designated Wells No. 20, No. 21, and No. 22 as upgradient
wells, along with the previously designatd upgradient well, Well No. 19, and
have designated Process Well No. 4 as the only downgradient well.
It is the consensus opinion of the Task Force that the current gradient
relationships designated by American Cyanamid are not founded on sufficient
rationale and data and that the original designations were more appropriate.
The following factors were considered in making this decision:
o In an area of horizontal water table conditions where micro-changes
in water levels result in apparent changes in ground water flow
directions, it is more appropriate to consider what is happening in
the larger areal hydrogeologic frame work regarding ground water flow
for determining the true direction of ground water flow. It is clear
that ground water at the American Cyanamid facility flows from north
and northeast of the facility to the southwest, ultimately discharging
to both the wetlands bordering Escambia Bay and to Escambia Bay itself.
Given these conditions, Well No. 19 would be the upgradient well and
would be capable of yielding ground water samples which are unaffected
by the facility.
o Process Well No. 4 is screened in a different water bearing formation
than any of the other designated RCRA monitoring wells. It is not
appropriate to include it in a system designed for immediate detection
of a release from the regulated unit.
The RCRA system evaluated in the following section is the originally
designated configuration. This evaluation considers well location, number of
wells, well construction, appropriateness of the saturated interval sampled,
and the failure to address the potential of clay lenses as plume deflectors.
Well Location - The wells appear to be adequately located with the excep-
tion of Well No. 21. The designated upgradient well (Well No. 19) is
located upgradient of the Deep Well Equalization Basin and does not appear
to be in a location which can be affected by other facility operations.
The downgradient wells are either directly downgradient from the basin
or are marginally downgradient. The location of Well No. 21 is not in
compliance with the requirement that wells be located at the downgradient
limit of the waste management area.
-------
-14-
It is located approximately 200 feet from the south edge of the basin.
Based on observations made during the inspection, this well could have
been located much closer to the waste management area.,
Number of Wells - It is the consensus of the Task Force that the number
of wells at the basin is inadequate for a detection monitoring system.
However, this system has detected a release from the basin. This conten-
tion is supported by facility statistical comparisons, (Appendix E), an
empirical comparison of historical waste constituent data from analyses
of samples collected from the system (Appendix F), and a statistical
comparison performed by FL-DER staff which indicates acrylonitrile is
present in Well No. 22 at significantly higher concentrations than in
Well No. 19 (Appendix G).
Well Construction/Monitoring Interval - Figure 6 depicts the construction
of a typical RCRA monitoring well at American Cyanamid. Table 6 list the
pertinent well construction data for each well.
Although these wells are not constructed of materials that are currently
recommended for use in monitoring wells where organic constituents are
of concern, they appear to have functioned adequately as detection moni-
toring wells with respect to a number of indicator parameters and specific
organic waste constituents (see Appendices E,F and G).
Another aspect of well construction that is not generally considered
acceptable is the placement of the screened interval with respect to the
water table (see Figure 7). The downgradient wells are screened such
that the top of the screens are a minimum of ten feet below the water
table (based on water level measurements taken during the inspection).
The top of the screen in Well No. 21 is approximately 25 feet below
the water table. When these factors are considered, together with the
fact that little or no drawdown is experienced in these wells during
sampling, it is clear that the screened intervals should have been
located higher to monitor the upper part of the water table.
Any future wells constructed and utilized for RCRA ground water moni-
toring should be constructed with inert materials, as necessary, and
should be constructed with more regard given to screened interval/water
table relationships* They should also be constructed in a manner that
can measure specific levels and concentrations of contamination. To
the extent possible, the length of the extensive sand pack should be
reduced to generally reflect the screened interval. The Task Force
realizes the difficulty of constructing wells in caving formations, but
this should be addressed during construction of future wells.
Effects of Clay Lenses - It appears the RCRA ground water monitoring effort
may have failed to address a significant hydrogeologic system between the
surface and the saturated zone that is being monitored. The hydrogeologic
cross section provided by American Cyanamid indicates that numerous clay
lenses are present. There is no evidence than any consideration was given
to these units as supporting localized perched ground water systems.
Particularly important with respect to this issue is the ability of and
potential for these clay lenses to deflect ground water and any contami-
nation associated with the leakage from the Deep Well Equalization Basin.
-------
-15-
It would be possible for a perched contaminant plume to travel beyond the
detection capability of the existing monitoring system before its transi-
tion into the next lower ground water regime. Any future geotechnical
investigatory effort and ground water quality assessment must take into
consideration the presence of any lenses and their potential as plume
deflectors. Also, future efforts should take into consideration well
construction materials, screened intervals and the need for multi-level
monitoring.
Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan
A RCRA ground water sampling and analysis plan (SAP) was provided for
review by the task force during the evaluation at American Cyanamid. The
SAP presented for review was as contained in the facility RCRA Part B permit
application.
The SAP as written and compiled, does not fully meet the requirements
of a sampling and analysis plan as described at 40 CFR Part 265.92(a). These
requirements state that the SAP must contain procedures and techniques for:
(1) sample collection
(2) sample preservation and shipment
(3) analytical procedures; and
(4) chain-of-custody control
The American Cyanamid SAP is very general with respect to most of the
aspects listed above. Only the section regarding sample collection contained
any useful detail. The following comments are provided and oust be addressed
to insure that an adequate SAP exists for the facility. The appropriate por-
tions of the SAP have been extracted from the Part B and are presented below
preceding the comments.
"Sampling
Fifteen minute pump out of the well casing is sufficient to purge standing
water from all wells. Each monitoring well contains a 0.3 hp submersible
pump that pumps at approximately 10 gpm. This is adequate to evacuate a
46-foot section of casing 5 times prior to sampling."
This more correctly describes procedures for purging wells prior to sampling.
Because no water columns measured during the evaluation were ascertained to
be greater than the 46-foot water column specified in the SAP, this procedure
provides for a minimum of five volumes to be removed prior to sampling. How-
ever, because the water column in Hell Number 19 was measured at approxi-
mately 11 feet, over 20 volumes would have been removed according to this
procedure if the pump had been run for the specified 15 minutes during the
inspection. This procedure needs to be replaced with one which allows for a
determination of a standard removal volume for each well (i.e., 3-5 volumes),
and which also contains procedures for insuring that all stagnant water has
been removed (i.e., measuring pH, specific conductance, and temperature).
-------
-16-
Although not included in the facility SAP the sampling procedures utilized by
American Cyanamid were determined by interviews with facility personnel and
are described in the following few paragraphs.
Dedicated submersible pumps are employed by American Cyanamid to purge the
RCRA monitoring wells. As such, it is not practical to use other equipment,
such as bailers, to collect samples after purging is completed. Samples are
collected directly from the pump discharge pipe, which extends out of the
well cap at the top of casing. The submersible pumps and associated sample
delivery systems are not constructed of material recommended by EPA in the
Technical Enforcement Guidance Document. However, because the nature of
contamination expected at American Cyanamid is not related to the materials
utilized in the sampling equipment construction, the system can be considered
adequate in this respect.
Table 3 contains a list of sample containers used for the various parameters
monitored by American Cyanamid under their current RCRA program. The Task
Force recommends changing container types for two of the parameters to insure
a valid sample is collected. Samples collected for phenol analyses must be
collected in glass containers, preferably amber, with Teflon® lined caps.
Sample collected for TOX analyses must be collected in amber glass containers
of at least 500 ml volume. The container must be capped with a Teflon® lined
septum cap and the sample must be collected with no head space.
"Sample Preservation and Shipment
Samples are to be packed on ice and delivered to Pioneer Laboratories, Pensa-
cola or Cyanamid Labs within twenty four hours of obtaining samples and ana-
lyzed or preserved per EPA directives see the analysis plan."
American Cyanamid does not chemically preserve any samples in the field. The
samples are either carried to the on-site laboratory, where they are refriger-
ated and analyzed as soon as possible, or they are iced down and transported
to the Pioneer Laboratory, Inc. in Pensacola, where they are either immediate-
ly analyzed or are chemically preserved and refrigerated until analyses can
be conducted.
All samples, which, under accepted sampling and analytical protocols and
procedures, are required to be preserved, must be preserved in the field
immediately after the sample is collected, to preserve the integrity of that
sample. American Cyanamid must change their SAP to reflect this change and
should implement this important change immediately.
"Analytical Procedures
Pioneer Laboratories, Pensacola, has been certified by the State of Florida
(Certificate No. 81142) to perform the necessary analysis. They will follow
the EPA Guidelines establishing test procedures for the analysis of pol-
lutants ."
The SAP must include a reference to a specific analytical procedure for each
parameter or constituent which is analyzed or measured. The American Cyanamid
SAP does not include a list of procedures.
-------
-17-
While examining American Cyanamid's records, this information was found, in
part, to be contained on data sheets used to report analyses to the state.
Suitable procedures were listed for chloride, iron, phenols, sodium, nitrate,
sulfate, TOC, pH and specific conductance. The analytical procedure refer-
ences for manganese and TOX, however, are inaccurate and inadequate. Page
3240, Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 98, May 19, 1980 is cited for these two
parameters. There is no page 3240 for the date referenced. The page number
should be 33240, which list the requirements for a RCRA sampling and analyses
plan and the parameters to be monitored. On this page there is a parenthetic
reference to two EPA publications which contain information on sampling and
analysis, including procedures for analysis. Referencing this page, however,
does not constitute a reference to a specific procedure for either parameter.
In addition, there are no specific procedures referenced for the interim
primary drinking water standards required by 40 CFR 265.92(b) (1). The data
reporting sheet from Pioneer Laboratory, Inc. indicates all analyses were
"performed according to methods approved by EPA." These procedures must be
specified in the SAP.
In order the improve the SAP, with respect to this section, American Cyanamid
must consolidate all existing information from the data reporting sheets
regarding specific references to analytical procedures, as well as provide
this information for the parameters for which this information does not exist
(i.e. manganese, TOX and the interim drinking water standards).
"Chain-of-Custody Control
Standard Purchase Order procedures were followed. Samples were delivered to
Pioneer Laboratories by an employee, (operator or supervisor) from the Santa
Rosa plant."
Although this description of chain-of-custody control which was extracted
from the SAP, is too general for making an adequacy determination, a discussion
with American Cyanamid staff of standard purchase order and sample delivery
procedures indicated that adequate control exists between the time the samples
are collected and the time analysis occurs.
American Cyanamid should describe these procedures more fully. It would also
be appropriate to include a mock copy of any form(s) used to implement these
procedures.
Sample Parameters
Tables 3 and 4 contain the sampling frequencies and lists of parameters for
which American Cyanamid has sampled and for which they will be sampling under
their RCRA ground water sampling program. This program provides for sampling
for all of the RCRA parameters at at least the required frequency and repli-
cation.
-------
-18-
Ground Water Quality Assessment
Despite the fact that numerous statistical comparisons of both RCRA
indicator parameters and the waste specific parameter acrylonitrile have
shown that ground water beneath the Deep Well Equalization Basin is con-
taminated, American Cyanamid Company has not implemented an adequate ground
water quality assessment program to define the chemical nature, rate of
migration, and vertical and horizontal extent of the plume. The required
outline of a program to accomplish the assessment has not been developed.
American Cyanamid has contended that the contamination observed in Wells
No. 21 and 22 and in Process Well No. A is the result of a surface spill
of sodium thiocyanate and water and is not the result of impoundment leakage.
The ground water data from the Task Force evaluation, which is discussed
more fully later in the report, clearly shows that numerous purgeable and
extractable organic compounds which aren't associated with sodium thiocyanate
are present in samples collected from Wells No. 21 and 22. It is the con-
sensus opinion of the Task Force that these data nullify and overide
American Cyanamids contention.
American Cyanamid must therefore develop a ground water quality assess-
ment plan which is capable of:
1) Determining the waste constituents in the plume and their concen-
tration gradients,
2) Determining the rate of movement of the plume and,
3) Determining the horizontal and vertical extent of the plume.
This plan should take into consideration suitability of materials
for well construction and the necessity for multi-level monitoring in order
to observe both vertical extent of contamination and the control exerted
by clay lenses on plume flow directions in the vicinity of the RCRA Deep
Well Equalization Basin.
TASK FORCE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND HANDLING PROCEDURES
This section describes the procedures utilized for sampling monitoring
wells, leachate collection systems, and leak detection systems during the
inspection. Samples were collected by GCA and Region IV personnel to deter-
mine if ground water contains hazardous waste constituents or other indica-
tors of contamination.
Water samples were collected from 10 monitoring wells, the SWMA leachate
collection system, and the Deep Well Equalization Basin leak detection system
sump. Appendix I contains the sampling record completed by GCA for each
location. All RCRA monitoring wells and selected SWMA wells were sampled.
-------
-19-
American Cyanamid was offered and accepted replicate and split samples
at all sample locations. The Task Force and GCA were notified after sam-
pling began that American Cyanamid did not need all portions of the sample
that the Task Force was collecting (i.e., VOA replicates and parameters that
they were not going to run). From this point on, American Cyanamid was
supplied with a partial split sample at the remaining stations. EPA Region
IV requested and received split samples at Wells SI-1, MW-18, MW-19, and
MW-22. The State of Florida did not request split samples at any station.
RCRA Monitoring Wells
GCA measured water levels at wells 19, 20, 21 and 22 and, using facility
well depth records, calculated three water column volumes for each well.
The in-place pumps were accuated and three volumes of water were removed.
Prior to any activity at a monitoring well, Hnu and geiger counter
readings were taken to determine if any explosive or radioactive gases were
present at the well head. Readings were negative at all wells. Three in-situ
samples were taken during purging to provide measurements of record for pH,
temperature and specific conductance, as well as purge adequacy data.
All samples, except for samples collected for phenol analyses, were
collected, handled and shipped according to the Ground Water Task Force
protocol. Because of an error in the sample bottle list provided to the
sampling crew, the phenols sample was collected in a plastic container.
Solid Waste Management Area Wells
Water levels and total depths at these wells were measured by GCA.
Three water column volumes and the samples were then removed at all wells
except SI-1, using Teflon® bailers. SI-1 was purged using the dedicated
pitcher pump. All other aspects of sampling were as described for the RCRA
system.
Process Well No. 4
Because this well was under constant use, purging was not necessary.
Samples were collected at an inline spigot and handled as described in the
RCRA sampling section.
Leachate Collection System
The sump at the leachate collection system was sampled using a Teflon®
bailer. All samples were placed in the appropriate containers and handled
according to the Ground Water Task Force protocol. They were shipped as
hazardous samples.
-------
-20-
Leak Detection System
The sump for the Deep Well Equalization Basin was checked for liquids,
which were observed and sampled. Because only 4"-6" of standing liquid
was observed, the samples were collected using a peristaltic pump and vacuum
jug. A section of Teflon® tubing was connected to the vacuum jug and placed
in the standing liquid. After it was collected in the jug, the sample was
transferred to its appropriate container. The samples for volatile organic
constituents were collected from the tubing prior to its discharge into the
jug to minimize volatilization effects. These samples were handled according
to the Ground Water Task Force protocol and shipped as a hazardous sample.
Blanks
Five blanks were prepared using HPLC (High Pressure Liquid Chromatography)
water as part of the QA/QC effort for the field activities. Two trip blanks
were prepared, one for the eastern (RCRA) portion of the site and one for
the western (SWMA) portion of the site. Equipment blanks were prepared for
the Teflon® bailers and the peristaltic pump/vacuum jug and Teflon® tubing
used to collect the Leak Detection System sump sample. A trip blank was also
prepared. All blanks were shipped to the contract laboratory as other samples
with no special identification.
LABORATORY EVALUATIONS
Three laboratories are utilized by American Cyanamid for analyses of
ground water samples collected to meet the requirements of 40 CFR Part 265,
Subpart F. Two of these laboratories are American Cyanamid's Environmental
Control Laboratory and the Analytical Development and Process Control Lab-
oratory. An off-site lab, Pioneer Laboratories, Inc., Pensacola, Florida,
provides additional analytical capability. These laboratories were evaluated
March 25-26, 1986 by Region IV Environmental Services Division staff. The
complete report is included in this report as Appendix J. The following is
a summary of the findings from the evaluation.
1. Personnel:
The analysts responsible for the RCRA ground water analyses have
from six months to twenty years of analytical experience. The
analysts appeared to be very competent and adequately trained
to conduct the analyses for the ground water monitoring.
2. Facilities and Equipment:
Each laboratory has ample space which includes sufficient bench
space for processing samples; storage space for chemicals and
glassware, and portable instrumentation; and open floor space for
large equipment such as refrigerators and incubators. Most of the
lab equipment was modern and appeared to be in excellent working
condition. The only exception was the instrumentation used for
the total metal analyses.
-------
-21-
The atomic absorption unit used to conduct the total metal and
analyses in the Analytical Development & Process Control Laboratory
was not equipped with a digital readout or recorder that would pro-
vide adequate sensitivity, and readability for measuring low levels
of trace metals (less than 100 ug/1).
3. Sample Containers:
Phenol samples are collected in plastic containers. These samples
should be collected in amber glass containers with Teflon® lined
caps.
4. Chain-of-custody:
The facility has adequate chain-of-custody procedures and documen-
tation for the disposition of samples.
5. Methodology:
The methods in use for the RCRA self-monitoring program were general-
ly in accordance with 40 CFR Part 265.92 (a) and Part 136 for all
parameters. Deficiencies were noted for the trace metal procedures
conducted on-site and the Base Neutral/Acid/Volatile organic proce-
dures at the contract laboratory.
6. Quality Assurance and Data Documentation:
The Environmental Control Laboratory and Pioneer Laboratories have
established quality assurance programs that consists of duplicates,
spikes and reference standards to verify the quality of data for
each parameter analyzed. These quality control measures are used
to establish precision and accuracy control limits for the ground-
water analyses. Instrument calibration records are maintained and
temperatures of regulated devices are checked. All raw data calcu-
lations, gravimetric weighings, absorbance readings, GC and GC/MS
performance checks are documented and maintained on file as required
in the State and Federal requirements. Daily operating conditions
and quality control practics are easily reconstructed. The Analyti-
cal Development Laboratory has adequate quality control procedures
for the acrylonitrile and beta sulfo propion nitrile procedures.
Quality control procedures for the trace metals were lacking. Some
additional quality assurance suggestions that would strengthen the
quality of data produced are:
a. Establish a quality assurance program that consists of dupli-
cates, spikes and reference standards to verify the quality of
data for each parameter analyzed. Use these data to establish
precision and accuracy data for control limits for the space
metal.
b. Digest standards or fortified samples periodically for the TKN
procedure to determine digestion efficiency.
-------
-22-
c. Conduct and document routine checks of the analytical balances
with class "S" or equivalent weights in the milligram weight
ranges encountered in the gravimetric tests, or when weighing
primary standards.
d. Verify spectrophotometry calibration curves each day of use
with a blank and at least one standard at mid-range of the
calibration curve. Daily checks should agree within +/- 10
percent of the original curve or a new curve must be prepared.
Verification data should be recorded and maintained on site
with the appropriate sample data.
7. Performance Evaluation Data:
The Environmental Control Laboratory participated in DMR-QA Study
5. Acceptable data were submitted for pH, TSS, ammonia nitrogen,
TKN, nitrate nitrogen and BOD5. Pioneer Laboratories participated
in the study and had 92.3 percent acceptable data. Pioneer also
participated in Water Supply Study 17. Acceptable performance was
demonstrated for all parameters except the Trihalomethanes (Purgeable
Organics). Performance for the pesticide parameters were generally
acceptable.
The facility's ground water sampling and analysis plan was available for
inspection. The plan states that Pioneer Laboratories conducts all ana-
lysis and EPA approved procedures are used. The contract lab does not
conduct the trace metal analyses, and nonapproved procedures are
employed. The plan should be updated to reflect actual sampling and
analytical procedures used.
Based on the overall findings, the facility appears to be providing
acceptable quality data for all parameters, except phenol and trace
metals (copper, iron, manganese and zinc). The deficiencies noted
for the trace metals would cause the reliability of some of the data
to be questionable. The sample container deficiency for phenol could
cause the reliability of some of the data to be questionable.
The operation of the GC/MS spectrometer without meeting the performance
criteria would not render the organic data unusable, considering the
other quality control checks utilized by the contract laboratory.
MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS
Acceptability and Validity of Data
The samples collected during this evaluation were analyzed by Compu-
Chem Laboratories, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and Centec Labora-
tories, Salem, Virginia. Compu Chem performed the organic analyses and
Centec performed the inorganic analyses. The results were compiled and tabu-
lated by Life Systems, Inc. and forwarded to the Task Force for evaluation.
The OSWER functional guidelines for evaluating contract laboratory program
data, as well as the Region IV EPA protocols were used to assess the validity
of the data. All data was considered valid except for the results of analyses
for mercury for all samples. Some data was qualified, as indicated in the
data summary tables, as estimated in concentrations or as presumptive evidence
of material.
-------
-23-
There was generally a good agreement between the contract labs and the
Region IV lab, except for the mercury analyses, on samples split with Region
IV. A limited amount of indicator type data for these same samples was also
provided by American Cyanamid for review. With the exception of one nitrate
value, the ammonia and nitrate values reported by American Cyanamid were
acceptable. All of the reported sulfate, chloride and TOC data were unaccept-
able, that is, these values were greater than four standard deviations
different than the EPA values.
Total Versus Dissolved Metals Values
Samples collected for metals analyses were analyzed for both total and
dissolved metals concentrations. Generally, there was no pattern for rela-
tive concentrations of total vs. dissolved metals for samples collected of
clear, non-turbid ground water. With few exceptions, the values for both
analyses were very nearly identical. Only in the more turbid samples was
there a pattern of higher total concentrations vs. dissolved concentrations.
Because the samples were not true splits there should not be any concern for
the closeness of the total and dissolved data for the clear samples.
Discussion of Results
Ground water degradation has occurred at both the RCRA and SWMA areas at
the American Cyanamid facility. The degradation at the RCRA area is signifi-
cant and predominantly organics, while that at the SWMA is primarily inorganic.
Table 7 summarizes the data from samples collected from the RCRA ground water
monitoring wells, Process Well No. 4, and the leak detection sump at the Deep
Well Equalization Basin. Table 8 summarizes the data from ground water
monitoring wells and the leachate collection system at the solid waste manage-
ment area. These data are discussed in the following sections.
RCRA Area
Inorganic Elements/Compounds
Eleven inorganic elements and compounds were detected in samples collec-
ted from monitoring wells in this area. Of these eleven, manganese, calcium,
magnesium and sodium are found in noticably higher concentrations in down-
gradient well MW-22 than in the upgradient well, MW-19. The other downgradient
wells, MW-20 and MW-21, also reflect higher concentrations than MW-19 but not
to the extent of MW-22.
Thirteen elements were detected in the leachate samples collected for
both total and dissolved analyses. Sodium, present at a concentration of 590
mg/1 (total) was the major inorganic leachate constituent. Calcium was also
present at 72 mg/1 and magnesium was detected at 17 mg/1. All other metals
were present at concentrations measured less than 10 mg/1.
-------
-24-
Extractable Organic Compounds
Extractable organic compounds were detected in samples collected from
two wells and the leak detection system. Seven unidentified compounds were
detected in the samples from well MW-21 at total estimated concentrations of
5080 ug/1. Ten unidentified compounds were detected in the sample from well
MW-22 at an estimated total concentration of 400 ug/1. Six compounds were
detected in the leak detection sump sample. Presumptive evidence was found
for two compounds, bromacil, a herbicide, at an estimated concentration of
300 ug/1 and C2 alkylbenzenesulfonamide, at an estimated concentration of 20
ug/1. Four unidentified compounds were estimated to be present at a concen-
tration of 200 ug/1.
Purgeable Organic Compounds
Purgeable organic compounds were detected in wells MW-20, MW-21, and
MW-22, and process well number 4. Chloroform, tetrachloroethene and carbon
tetrachloride, in order of increasing concentration, were detected in wells
MW-21 and, most significantly, in well MW-22, where the concentrations ranged
from 150 ug/1 chloroform to 3200 ug/1 carbon tetrachloride. The sample from
well MW-22 also contained carbon disulfide at an estimated concentration of
35 ug/1. The only purgeable organic compound detected in the sample from well
MW-20 was carbon tetrachloride at an estimated 3.3 ug/1.
There was only one compound detected in process well number 4, 1,1-dich-
loroethene, at 8.0 ug/1. No compounds detected in the RCRA wells were detected
in the process well and vice versa.
Conventional/Indicator Parameters
Consistent with the previously discussed organic data, there is a clear
indication in these data that ground water beneath the RCRA regulated unit has
been affected by the facility. Sulfate, POX, TOX, T0C, chloride and phenols
were all detected in samples from wells MW-20, and particularly MW-21 and
MW-22, at concentrations greatly exceeding those detected in the background
well, MW-19.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AREA (SWMA)
Inorganic Elements/Compounds
Although the location of the well chosen as the upgradient, background
well for this data, well SI-1, appears to be in a location unaffected by the
facility or other sources, the metals data suggest possible sample interfer-
ence from well construction materials. Most notably, copper and zinc were
detected at total metals concentrations of 2,000 and 11,000 ug/1, respective-
ly. These constituents are possibly the result of the galvanized pipe and
other materials used in construction of the pitcher pump used for ground
water sampling. Lead was also present in this sample at 150 ug/1.
-------
-25-
Each of the downgradient wells sampled in this area is.downgradient of a
distinctly different part of the SWMA and appear to display different chemical
characteristics with regard to the metals data. The sample from Well MW-5,
downgradient of the closed lower dump, contained the greatest number of metals.
Although a comparison of data from this well against background quality is
difficult because of the construction material interferences at SI-1, several
metals are present that are thought not to be naturally occurring or are pre-
sent at concentrations higher than the perceived background. Arsenic, barium,
copper, lead, vanadium, and sodium were detected in the sample from MW-5.
The sample collected at well MW-13 contains high barium, lead, manganese,
calcium, magnesium, and sodium. These constituents are due, most likely,
to leachate migrating through the dike into which the well was installed,
although no lead was detected in the leachate sample.
The samples collected from wells MW-18 and MW-24 show little effects,
if any from facility operations. Well MW-24 was currently undergoing develop-
ment and contained low concentrations of barium and antimony, probable
evidence of the presence of drilling mud.
The leachate sample contained barium, cadmium, chromium, tin, manganese,
calcium, sodium and potassium at probable higher than background concentra-
tions.
Extractable Organic Compounds
The only extractable organic compounds detected in samples collected from
the SWMA were in the leachate sample. N-nitrosodiphenlyamine/diphenylamine
and di-n-butyl-phthalate were estimated to be present 2.8 ug/1 and 6.6 ug/1
respectively.
Purgeable Organic Compounds
Purgeable organic compounds were detected in one well sample and in the
leachate sample. Vinyl chloride, detected at 13 ug/1, and carbon disulfide,
estimated at 1.7 ug/1 were detected in the sample collected at well MW-13.
Only methylene chloride, estimated at 1.7 ug/1, was detected in either lea-
chate.
Conventional/Indicator Parameters
Samples collected from wells MW-5 and MW-13 and analyzed for these
parameters generally, with several exceptions, reflect the leachate as their
source. Ammonia, POK, TOC, chloride, phenols and TOX concentrations particu-
larly reflect this relationship.
-------
-26-
REFERENCES
American Cyanamid Company Santa Rosa Plan RCRA Part B Permit Application
American Cyanamid Company, Milton, Florida, July 15, 1985. '
Personal Communication, Sharitz, Neil, American Cyanamid Company, Milton
Florida, March A, 1986. '
Geology of Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Western Florida Panhandle.
Bulletin No. 46, Marsh, Owen T., State Board of Conservation, Division
of Geology, 1966.
Ground Water Resources in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida, MaD
Series No. 26, Barraclough, Jack T., Florida Bureau of Conservation,
Division of Geology, 1967.
Environmental Geology Series, Pensacola Sheet, Map Series No. 78, Schmidt
Walter, Florida Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Geology, 1978.
Interim Report on the Water Resources of Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties,
Florida, Information Circular No. 30^ Musgrove, R^ et^ al., state
Board of Conservation, Division of Geology, 1968.
Results of Drilling and Testing of Deep Test Wells for Waste Disposal
Activities at the American Cyanamid Company Santa Rosa Plant, Santa Rosa
County, Florida, Black, Crow and Eidsness, Inc. Engineers, Gainesville,
Florida, October 1971.
RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Draft, April 1986.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th edition
(1980).
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater, March 1983.
-------
APPENDICES
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPLETE TASK FORCE DATA
-------
TVDr « »«
/if>w /»"»' 09 'm—**&**"<*¦ ~ »*»»»
fM'f£#,#£
-------
07/28/16
m*esf!,m fr
VINE*3 W0RG1A
METALS
data reporting sheet
water
wwwwwumMttUSWSI 1**101/0*0"'
AlMSt.v »n » a&i*l ? ? • !
SAKPLF TYPE I MONaL
PROJECT NO,| 86*306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTl RCRA
SOURCE! AFRICAN cr»N»*in
CITY I HILTON STATE I Hi
STATION I.D.I MW«20#Q110J,MOA002
STORKT STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TIME 03/01/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION| STOP DATE/TIM* 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYl
AMPLE REC'Di DATE/TIME 00/00/00
~ALED|
SA
££,
CHEMISTI GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
-CASE *0.1 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK) NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
RECEIVED FROM!
REC'D BY!
INORG SAMPLE NO, I MO
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TBB
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••REMARKS***
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR PAY NOT BE PRESENT
~R*AESAMPbiNG—and—rsanaly£ is—m-nece88ary~for—Verification-
s'
UNITS
UG/L
—UG/L -
"UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Sgft
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
SILVt'R
-AR&ENIC
BORON
BARIUM
beryllium
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROO t'
COHPfcR
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEkCUHY
ALUMINUM
MANGANbSE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM -
POTASSIUM
•••FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE - *NA«NQT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRE8UmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be less than value given
•l-actual value IS known to re greater than value given
•U-MATERXAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LI*IT.
-------
/ wmf w swims mm
,* it
ATHENS GKORGIA
tiMjimmcw nmn*****
07/28/86
METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE NO, t «e.ci?.'*2
86-306
PROJECT NO.I . _
SOURCES AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITY I HILTON
iTORETNSTl?lr H"-2l»ul103'MOAO°3
PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
STATE I »"L
[ON NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATE/TIME 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP PATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY|
SAMPLE REC ' DI DATE/THE 00/00/00
SEALED!
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO, I Hit ORG SAMPLE-NO! 0
CONTRACT LABORATORY fORGANIC)t
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
RECEIVED F«0*f
REC'O
BY!
RESULTS UNITS
911 UG/L
40U r-UC/l
INORG SAMPLE #0,1 MD
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TBB
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYl GKB
•••REMARKS***
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
•(•RESAMPLING AND REAnALYSIS IS NECESSARY-FOR-VERIFICATION
NA
24
2"
4U
lflU
»'iu J
1 "U
NA
27U
51)
5BU
4,0U«J-
40U
NA
NA
MA --
7UJ
1BU
NA
20U.I
W A
0.85R
7*U
UOO
21
8,7
0,04U
2.5U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L-
UG/L
UG/L
-Ug^fc-
ELLNENT
SILVER
ARSENXC-
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
-MG/L
MG/L
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
-CADMIUM
COBALT
cHnomuh
COPPEK
-MQL YBO£NUM-
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
-SFLENXUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
-TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
-MANGANESE—
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
-SODIUM
POTASSIUM
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INIERFERENCES
•J-E8TIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL MAS ANALYZED-FOR BUT NOT-DETECTED,-TWE-MUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
07/28/66
M*rif 4*0 jM&rfifl www ewe*
MUCgO.dCG tY
ATHENS GEORGIA
DATA RRpSrt|[nc SHEET
WATER
;insrr N".! 8SJi*2?2
sr.«Pi«: •??*; rp.. vesvell
RECEIVED FROM!
0 REC'D Bit I
PROJECT NO.I 86*306 PROGRAM ELEMENTI RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATEl FL
STATION I.O.I P«-4,01111,MQA011
STORGT STAXION NOt
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIMF 03/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I
SAMPLE REC'D| date/time on/no/oo
SEALED|
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL METHODI
CASE NO.I—I lit ORG SAMPLE NO! D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
8ANPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TAB
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
~••REMARKS*#*
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-B«RESAMPLlN&-AND^REAMALYSISIfi-NECES8ARY-F0R-VfiBIFICATIflN
RESULTS
9V
4»
NA
94
211
Iouj
8U
XPU
NA
27U
3U
b«U
jnj
40U
NA
NA
¦ NA
IOUJ
1BU
NA
11U
NA
0.85R
7$U
47 —
1.4
2.5D
vwitfrf#w»--
UMTS EliEHEHt
UG/L SILVtR
-Uq/L ARSKNIG
UG/L ' BORON
UG/L BARIUM
UG/L BERYLLIUM
UG/L CADMIUM
UG/L COBALT
UG/L CHKCH i
UG/L COPPER
UG/L— MOLYBDENUM
UG/L NICKEL
UG/L LEAD
Ufi/L ANTIMONY
UG/L - SELENIUM
UG/L TIN
UG/L STRONTIUM
UG/L TELLURIUM
UG/L TITANIUM
UG/L THALLIUM
UG/L VANADIUM
UG/L YTTRIUM
UG/L ZINC
1IG/L ilHCONIUM
UG/L MEhCURY
UG/L ALUMINUM
-UG/L -MANGANESE
MG/L CALCIUM
MG/L MAGNESIUM
MG/L IRON
MG/L SODIUM
MG/L POTASSIUM
t
>!
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••«•••«•••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES#**
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZES •NAI-INWRFEBENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE
•K- - --
•L« _ ___ __ __ ___
*U-MATERiALWAS ANALYZED FOR BUT-NOT-DETSCTEIX. THE-NUMBKR IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
l—AVERAGfc VALUE, •NA-NQT ANAbTZEU •
¦ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
(-actual value is known to be less Than value given
L.-XCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
-------
ATHENS GEORGIA "*£R\Jl,TS
91'
. 4U
07/J8/86 METALS NA
DATA REPORTING SHEET 210
WATER 2U
inuj
18U
SAMPLE NO, I B6Ct?2<)0 SAMPLE TYPE! PWnCESKEt- L
HU
NA -
UV
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCPA S8U
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMIo 5HJ
CITY I MILTON STATE I PL 40U
NA
STATION I.D.I PW-4 DUPLICATE,01!12,MQA012 NA
STORET STATION NO! MA
71) J
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIN* OJ/05/86 1BU
SAMPLE COLLECTION| STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00 NA
11U
COLLECTED »Yl PECEIVED FPOM| NA
SAMPLE REC'tll DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O B*| 0.7R
SEALED! 75U
46
CHENI8TI GKB 1,4
Analytical method» 1,2
CASE *>0.11111 ORG SAMPLE NOI D INDRG SAMPLE NO, I HO 5*5
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 2 ,5U
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC)!
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPV*
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••REMARKS***
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT T1ATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND HAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLlNC-ANDJUiANALYSlSIS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••••«••••••«***••••••••••••••••«•••••••••••••••••••*•••«*••••••
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NgT ANALYZED *NAI»INTERFERENCCS
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUhPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-acTual value is known to be less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN to re greater THAN VALUE given
•U-MATERIALWAS analyzed for but HOT DEJECTED, the number is
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LI"I?.
VlKtlS
UG/L
-UG/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
iiii/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CtCH€«T
SILVER
-ARSENIC-
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
COPPEk
MOLYbDfcNUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANXINONY
— SELENIUM—
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM—
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEhCURJf
ALUMINUM
MANGANfe.EE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
—SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
IWCSUtKE6 tr
ATHENS GVORGlfc
9H
07/21/86 METALS «*W
DATA REPORTING SHEET 21U
MATER 211
Iouj
1«U
SAMPLE NO,I *6C1?2*7 S'^Plf TY°T - Z.*f.C"A*F $"
iou
MA
2TU
5U J
PROJECT NO,l 86-306 PROGRAM Ef.EMENTI RCRA 580
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMIO 5UJ
CITY| MILTON STATE! FL 400
Nik
STATION I.D.I LCS#0U16,MOA01» M*
STORET STATION *01 M*
IOUJ
SAMPLE COLLECTION START DATE/TIM? 03/07/86 1«U
SAMPLE COLLECTION I STOP PATE/TI"* 00/00/00 i»*
11U
COLLECTED BTI PECETVEO FROH| N»
SAMPLE REC'OI OATE/TI«E 00/00/00 PEC't) R*» i.OR
SEALED! 7su
-- - ¦ - 5". -
CHE^ISTI GKB 0.82U
ANALYTICAL METHOD! 0.35U
CASE *0.1 till ORG SAMPLE N0| 0 INORG SAMpLE NO,I MD ?!§*"
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 2,5U
CONTRACT LABORATORY ONO*G*«IO|
REMARKf NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TAB SA«P1,E DATA VERIFIED BY I GKB
•••REMARKS###
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY »0T BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLlNCANDREA*ALY6lflI6 ~NECE66M*Y—FOR-VERIFICAf I©#-
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE- •NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N.PRESUMP« VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•"-actual value is known to be less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL HAS ANALYZED for SWT NOT DETECTED, T«E NUMBER IS
THE MINIvu* DETECTION LIMIT.
UMTS
UG/L
4JG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
L'G/L
UG/L
4JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ucj/L
UG/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MQ/h
MG/L
eu«e«T
SILVER
-ARSENIC
bOHON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM -
COBALT
CHRC"*,,V
COPPth
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STkOSTIU*
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
Vanadium
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZlkCUNIuM
MEHCUK*
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
calcium
NACNESIUH
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
m*mwrr
KtWtWfc GffcwGU W8 INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD *i*.--
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 2,5U
contract laboratory(inorganic)!
REMARK*-NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! T*B SA"PtE DATA VERIFIED BY I GKb
•~~REMARKS#**
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT RATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OP MAY NOT be PRESENT
—««RMAMPLI#C-AND-RSANALY8IS-I8NECE6SARYJ'OR-^EWMCATION
••~FOOTNOTES*^
•A-AVERAGE-VALUE -- «NA-HOT ANALYZED •NAI-INIERFERENCES ___ ¦-
*N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE or MATERIAL
tLUE GIVEN
__ „ _ « VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS -
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
—-- nn'uiicv wnu
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE (
•k-actual value is knonn to re less Than vai
~L-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO HE GREATER THAN
UHtft
UG/L
-UG/L —
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1
DG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
88*1:
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
--UC/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
—MG/L
MG/L
atm
silver
—ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
£Henu*""
COFPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM-
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEHCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
1RUN
—SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
07/28/86
/ s/mr w jmw mmwr
.~ tv
ATHENS GEORGIA
DATA REPORT^Sc sheet
'••wmufr"* #>»»»#•«
HATER
SAMPLE NO,: «6C1?2R3
SAMPLE TKPEI "ONfcL
PROJECT NO.I 8b«306 PROGRAM ELEMENTS "CPA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMll)
CITYt MILTON STATEt rL
STATION 1,0,1 MW-5,01104,MOAOO*
STORET STATION *01
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI START DATE/TIME 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP RATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI RECEIVED FROM|
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE/TIME 01/00/00 PEC'D Bll
EALEDl
CHE«ISTt GKB
ANALYTICAL METHODS
CASE no.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE "01 P
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATOPYCINORGANIC)l
REMARK| NATIONAL CROUND«ATKR SURVEY
REMARK!
INORG -SAMPLE NO, I MD
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TRB
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYI GKB
•••REMARKS*##
R-OUALIT* CONTROL INDICATES THAT 0 ATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OH MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-{{^RESAMPLING-AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY—F-GR—VtRIF-JCATION
RESULTS
70UJ
0.82U
units
UG/L
US/ir
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L-
UG/L
*•0/u
UG/L
UG/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UU/L
IJG/L
UG/L
UG/L
u8/l
»G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
4*G/L-
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L —
MG/L
ELEMEHT
SILVER
-ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
-CADMIUM
cobalt
fco^PER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
-TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VAhADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZlKCONlUM
MEHCURY
ALUMINUM
-MANGANESE
CALCIUM
magnesium
IRON
—sod him
POTASSIUM
•••FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE - •NA>NQT ANALYZED •NAI-XNTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •f-PRESUMPTlVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-acTual value is kmomn to re less Than value given
•L«ACTUAL VALUE is known TO be greater than VALUE GIVEN
•IMMATERIAL HAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT-DETECTED,—T«E NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
-------
07/28/80
mVMw/r
XtME>»S GlOfcGIA
METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
MATER
»>r* j ogC!? 2
-------
07/28/86
mmn
METAL*
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
6A«PLE NO.I PbCl?2*7
sat-PLE fyPE: ho«*i
PROJECT NO) t «6-3Pt> PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMTD
CITY I HILTON STATEJ FL
8TATI0N I.U.I Mw-18,01108,MOAOOS
STORE! STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TINE 03/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I
SAMPLE REC1DI DATE/TIME 00/00/00
SEALED!
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
RECEIVED FROMg
o RPr «
REC *D BY l
CASE NO*! 1111 ORG SAMPLE N0| I)
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OPGAHIC)!
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVFY
REMARK!
INORG SAMPLE NO,I MO
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED SYl
•••REMARKS#**
TRB
SAMPLE OAT* VERIFIED BYl GKB
mm
0(1
—4U
S t u
an
- 4u
|«°
19U
- HA
K°
5BU
J'lJ
40U
NA
NA
MA
10UJ
1PU
NA
11U
NA
0,7R
360
2)0
§:IIuu
h2
2.5U
m f mwj
«G/L
-uc/E-
—uc/i
• UG/L
ug/E
UG/L
-UG/L-
UG/L
us.'..
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-88ft
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
- UG/L¦
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
- UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
silver
-ARSENIC
tOHON
AKIUM
BERYLLIUM
-CADMIUM
COBALT
CKJ;',K
COFPEB
-MOLYBDENUM-
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
-SELENIUM—
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
- IIJAMIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIKCONIUM
MEhCUPK
ALUMINUM
- MANGANESE—
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
-SODIUM
POTASSIUM
•••FOOTNOTES#**
-•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NQT ANALYZED *NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J"ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to re less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATEHIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LI"IT.
-------
*rm ww*
07/28/86 METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
HATER
«»"orr «;n j S'fPLE TY"E! MOw«iJ;
PROJECT MO.I 86«306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITYI MILTON STATEi EL
STATION l.D.I MW-24,01113#MOA013
STURET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTIONl STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI RECETyED FROM I
SAMPLE REC'Dl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 PEC'D BY!
SEALED!
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I tilt ORG SAMPLE NOI 0 - INORG -SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)J
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)!
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! T*B SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••REMARKS***
R-QUAL1TY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-R"RESANPLlNC-AND-REANAltYsI4-IS—NECESSARY—F-OR-VEPIF-ICATIOII
•••FOOTNOTES***
«A-AVERAGE VALUE —*NA»MOT -ANALYSED- •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be less *han value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL MAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
*wmo
4U —
NA
10UJ
lflU
20UJ
19U
MA
27U
3u
58U
511J
40U
«»
NA
HA
7UJ
1«U
NA
30UJ
Nfc
O.toP
2000
jo.
is*
-47
2,5U
VHU0
UC/L
—UC/L
¦ UG/L
UG/L
UG/b
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L-
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/b
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
—-UG/L —
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
-MG/L
MG/L
sum
-ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROXTV"
COPPfcR
MOLYBUKNUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STKONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
2 INC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MA»CANESS-
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SOWHJM-
POlASSIUM
-------
07/28/86
m.rMerr
MVENS GEORGIA
METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
,t nsci'i^s
St-MPLS TYPfct LfAK DFTFC
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CY»N»MID
CITY I MILTON STftTEl FL
STATION I.D.I UDS-2,01118,MQA018
TORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/06/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION J STOP PATE/TTMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYt PErETyED FROMt
SAMPLE REC'DI DATE/TIME 0^/00/00 REC'P BY!
SEALED!
CHEMIST! GKP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I Ull ORG SAMPLE NO! D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)!
contract laboratory(inorganic)i
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
INORG SAMPLE NO, I Ml)
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TBB
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••REMARKS###
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UVUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
—R"R&SAMPLINC-AND-REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY-FOR-VEHITICATION
911
__ .41J-
NA
110
2U
lOUJ -
IflU
SniM
570
NA -
32
25J
5HU
3tlJ
40U
HA
N A
NA
71'J
leu
HI
870
NA
0.5R
8000
48 -
Vi
Ul
6,6
mifi
"G/L
--UG/L—
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
- UG/L
UG/L
1IG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
W,l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
TIG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
—UG/Ir
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
-MG/L
mg/l
titum
SILVER
-ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BEKYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
citnuK—•-
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM -
TIN
STKONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIHCUN1UM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE -
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
••••••••••••«•••••••••••••••••*•«•••••••••«••••••«•••••«•••##•••
•••FOOTNOTES*##
#A"AVERAGE^ALUK
##K.
•L-AeTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAtl VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS -ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LI"IT,
JUT"UTt5»»»
k-AVERAGE -VALUK- •NA-NQT ANALYZED #NAI-INTERFERENCES
¦ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
("ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
-------
m*m,wrr ;
WJWGlk 9))
.. . . - - 40
07/28/06 METALS {J*
DATA REPORTING SHEET 290
HATER 2D
1RU
sahpis h«,: ear 122^, c:. tlt -rrr: pr it
MA
27U
65
PROJECT NO.| 86-306 PROGRAM ElEMENTl RCRA 100
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID 20
CITY I MILTON STATEl *L 40U
N A
STATION I.D.I PE SET,01U9,MQA019 Nr
STORET STATION NOI N»
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/06/86 1BU
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TI** 00/00/00 NA^
COLLECTED By| RECEIVED FROMi NA
SAMPLE REC'tll DATE/TIME OO/OU/OO REC'D BYI 0.2
SEALED| 75U
— - - - 5U-
CHEMIST! GKfl 0,82
ANALYTICAL METHODS 3&U
-CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO,I MO 0,^4--
SCINTRACt LABORATORY(ORGANIC)! 2.SU
ONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)S
REMARK t NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK! NOT ANALYZED TO HOLDING TINE EXCEEDED
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I GKB
•••remarks*#*
•••FOOTNOTES***
— »A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA«NQT ANALYZED ~NAI-INIERFERENCES
•J-ESTTMATED VALUE *N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to re less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE is known TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
- «U-MATER1AL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
WW ITS tLMM
UG/L SILVER
-UC/L AR6ENIC-
UG/L " BORON
UG/L BAKIUN
UG/L BERYLLIUM
UG/L CADMIUM
UG/L COBALT
-------
¦ AMfl.K AHD AHtLrSlK ~ * HUCtMOT «YOTEM
CPA-Ran.REG IV
ATHENS Cfobgi*
07/2M/96 METALS
~"IPOHTI
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
S*MHr.,E I <»6rt?2flg SAhPLK TYPEI •"^DKLSC
PROJECT WO, f 86-30t> PROGRAM E'jEMENTI RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYAN^MTD
CITY| MILTON STATE I FL
STATION I.O.I FIELD BLANK,01109,MOAO09
TORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTXOni START DATE/TIME OJ/05/86
SAHPLK COLbECTIUMi STOP DATc/tImF no/00/00
COLLECTED RY» RF.CETvFD fRQMi
SAMPLE PfcC'DI DATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY I
SEALED!
CHE*ISTI GKB
analytical meTHHDi
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! t> INOrG SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORYCuHGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORYfINORGANIC)i
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I GKB
•~•REMARKS##*
•••footnotes###
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA»NOT ANALYZED #NAI-INTERFKRENCES
*JrESIlK"EP. •N-PRESUMPTIVF EVIDENCE or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•f-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LKSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
Is FU0WN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER 18
the minimum detection ltmt.
rft:»uL,TS
911
«U
N»
aiu
i"
411
i"u
i«u
MA
27U
l«u
SU
40U
N ft
N»
H A
7u
lflU
NA
14
Nit
0,8
73U
5U
0.B2U
0^351
0.O4U
0,5?U
2;5U
units
"G/li
-UG/L -
uc/E "
DG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
VC/L
UG/L
UG/L
»G/L
"G/L
"G/L
»G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/U
UG/l>
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ELtntNi
SItiVilK
-ARSCNIC
BOHON
BAHIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
Copper
molybdenum
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEhCUHY
ALUMINUM
MANGANfe.SE
CALCIUM
magnesium
IRON
SODIUM —
POTASSIUM
-------
niinriia, Aiu n" 1111iii j nnni«uc.r>r.i'0| D INORG SAMpLE NO.! MU 8^2U
Contract laboratorycorgautch 2,bit
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANICSI
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TBB SAMPtE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••remarks***
**»FOOTNCITE5***
•A-AVERAGE value *NA-N(1T ANALYZED •NAI-iNIEKFERENCE8
•J-E8TIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known Tn be less than value given
*l-actual value is known to be greater than value given
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION H^IT.
UKlTfl
UG/L
UC/t ~
ak
UG/L
UG/L
'Tr /•
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
l'G/L
'JG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
tl.tMENT
SILVfcH
-ARSENIC
BOHOM
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CALMIUM
COb AIT
CHHO.
COPPEH
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
6TK0N1IUH
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIHCONIllh
Mt'hCURY
ALUMINUM
*ANGAN£SL
CALCIUM
magnesium
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT S*STE"«
EPA-ESD.REC IV _
ATHENS GFORGIA OESULTS
-4U-
07/28/86 METALS *«
DATA RFPORTlNfi SHEET 37
HATER gU
J8U
SAMPLE 'JO, 1 R6C1?2'6 SAMPLE TVPEt PL-lrBLK
NA -
270
511
PROJECT NO«| 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA §BU
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID J" -
CITY! MILTON STATE I FL *6
N«
STATION I.D.I PUMP EQUIP *LK LDR-1i01114,MQA022 H»
TOBET STATION NO I **
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME A3/06/86 1BU
sample collectioni stop date/timf oo/oo/oo na
COLLECTED BYt RECETvED FROMI N»
t AMPLE REC'OI DATE/TI»E OO/OO/OO REC'D 8*1 0,3
EALEDl 4}00
-- 310
CHEMISTI GKB J,7
ANALYTICAL METHOD! l.B
5«°
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI T> INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD 380—
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 3,1
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INuRGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYI GKB
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERACE VALUE *NA"NOT ANALYZED •NAI"INJERIrEPENCES -
•J-EST1MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION MMJT.
rwuno"'
UNITB
ELEMENT
UG/L BILVEK
OJG/t— ARSKNIC-
UG/XBORON
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
-UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
-MG/L
MG/L
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
-CADMIUM
COBALT
CHnCip: ;V
COPPEH
- - MOLYBDCNUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
—SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
-—TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEKCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE -
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
—SODIUM
POTASSIUM
c
A ^
I
r
c
r
t
i
«
i
r
!
t
(
i
C
(
-------
SAMPr.E HMO ANAtYSIA MKNAGEMENT Hr«tE«
ePA-Esn.HEe fv
ATHENS cronci*
07/30/96 METALS
pjr
DATA REROUTING SHEET
H*T«*
SBNPLf Ttr,l BI.K-R
PROJECT NO.I 86*306 PROGRAM EI.E*ENTl RC"A
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMlO
CITY I MILTON STATE! 'L
STATION I.O.I TRIP BLANK
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIMF 03/07/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TJMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY t RECETvED FROM I
SAMPLE REC'Dl DATE/T1 "IE 00/00/00 RfC'O PYI
SEALED!
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL METH00I
INORG SAMPLE NO,! MU
CASE NQ.t 14 It OPG SArtPLR NO| n
CONTRACt LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATO«Y(INORGANIC)|
REMARK* NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUOVrY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I T*B 8AMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
~•~REMARKS**#
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVCRAGE VALUE #NA-VOT ANALYZED *NAI»INTERFERENCE5 --
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PReSumPTIVC EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO PE GREATEH THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 8'1T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION M"IT,
ICAULTS
vu
UNITS
UG/L
ELk-MCT
SILVER
4lt
N A
. AM8EMIC
BCHOH
BARIUM
21U
UG/L
Iu
UC/L
DC/Li
1 flU
UG/L
COBALT
17
UG/L,
CHRoRv
»C/L
COPPKH
hA
UG/L
(4ULYBDKVUM
27U
UG/L
NICKEL
311
UG/L
LEAD
5flU
I'G/L
ANTIMONY
511
UG/L
SELENIUM
40U
UG/L
TIN
NA
UG/L
6THPNT1U#
N A
UG/L
IfLLUKIUM
NA
UG/L
TITANIUM
10U
UG/L
UG/L
THALLIUM
i«U
VANADIUM
NA
UG/L
yttrium
17
UG/L
ZINC
NA
UG/L
ZIKCUNltIM
3,2
75U
5U.
UG/L
hhMCl/Pi
UG/L
UG/L
aluminum
MAftGANfcSi,
0.82U
MG/L
CALCIUM
0.3SU
MG/L
MAGNESIUM
0.04U
MG/L
IRON
0 J<>6
MG/L
SODIUM -
2.5U
MG/L
POTASSIUM
-------
a*"pr,r «kiu A^Af.yKi^ manacemcvt SYSTEM
FPA-MP.BCC IV
Arwc^s GPORCIA BtJjUliTS
4TJ
07/30/86 METALS 2*
Oat* HEpnRTINc SHEET 86
MATE" 2}J
1RU
SAMPLE NO, I RfeC 1 ?9?9 aAMPLf TYPEf MONWL BV
300*1
MA
27U
5"
PROJECT NO, I 86-306 PROGRAM E''E*ENTl RCR* 5«U
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I HILTON STATE! rL 4ou
N t
STATION 1,0,1 MW-19 DISSOLVED METAL fSAME AS SAMPLE 112292) N»
STORET STATION NCI N4
7'f
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TTm' O3/03/H6 1«U
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP P ATS/Tl no/00/00 N«
20UJ
COLLECTED BY! REfETvED FHUMI N»
SAMPLE PEC'0| DATE/TIME OO/nu/OO RKC'P PYI 0.65R
SEALED! 7SU
CHEMIST! GKB 1.2
ANALYTICAL MtTHQDi 3.3
,04U
INORG SAMPLE N0,« MD 3,0
2,5U
CASE NO. I 1U1 ORG SAMPLE NO! D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANTCJI
CONTRACT LAPOPATOPY(I*>OHG»NtC) I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED «YJ T«B SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED aY| GKB
••«WEMAPKS»«#
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DAT* ARE UNUSEABtE
R-COMPQUND MAY OH may not BE PRESFNT
^•RESAMPLING AND REANALYglS IS NECESSARY F"OR VERIFICATION
••#FOOTNOTEK«»«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA"NQT ANALYZED #NAl-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEP VALUE #N-PRESl'MPTlVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACfuAL value is known to re less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOp B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
units
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/b
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/u
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
I'G/L
UG/L
Mtf/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
tLtltNI
silver
ARSENIC
hohom
BAMIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CIIKCK'T .
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LCAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZlhCONlUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
SAMPLE AMD ANALYSIS m^nacCMBMT SYSTEM
KPA-irgn , reG IV
A THtNJ CfpRGIA
DATA REPORTING BHBBT 43
WATC* V
H.r*A«r.an« up, ^ A » _ r, — ^
*THE"a CEO"CI< "§®l"L.TS
4U
07/jo/#6 met»v« 2'
r|»f •*-
i*u
CHEMIST! GKB
ANALYTICAL method I
Contract laboratoryunorgan
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKi
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB Sample DATA VERIFIED BYt GKB
•••REMARKS###
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT n*T* ABE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPIilNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
4U
SAMPLE *Q,| t
i nuj
1»A
2"»U
3U
5«0
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PROGRAM Ef.C»FNT« *CRA 5«
souRCEt amIrican CYaNAMID 5"
CITYI MILTON STATEl *L 40
fTATlON I.D.I MW-20 DISSOLVED *ET»L (SAME AS 8AMPLE *12281)
TORET STATION NUi
40U
NA
N A
NA
iou
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TINF 03/03/86 1RU
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIM* 00/00/00 NS
0. 20U.I
COLLECTED BYi RECETyED KR0MI
SAMPLE REC'Dl DAtE/TI"E 00/00/00 «EC«D BYt U.7R
SEALED! 7$U
82b"
1.4
0.4U
JASE NO.! 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO| D INORG SAMPLE NO,| MD 44
ONTRA^T LABORATOFY(ORGANIC)£ 2.511
•••FOOTNOTES###
•A-AVERAGE VALUE #NA-Nqt ANALYZED •NAI-1NTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESt'MPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-aCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LFSS tHAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNONN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•IMMATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B»T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTIUN LIMIT.
.....ANKLTTtCAk HCS
units CLt"tKi
IIG/b SlbVtH
UC/L. ARSENIC
Il2/b BORON
UQ/ld bAHIUH
(IG/L BEHYLLIUM
UG/L CADMIUM
UG/L COBALT
UG/L CMHOKT- ••
UG/L COHPtH
UG/L MOLYBDENUM
UG/L NICKtL
UG/L LEAD
lIG/l ANJIMONY
IIG/L SELENIUM
UG/L TIN
UG/L STKONTIUM
UG/L TELLURIUM
UG/L TITANIUM
UG/L 1HALLIUM
UG/L VANADIUM
UG/L XTIRIUM
UG/L ZINC
UG/L ZImCONIUh
UG/L MEhCURY
UG/L ALUMINUM
UG/L MAWGANfcSE
MG/L CALCIUM
MG/L MAGNESIUM
MG/L IRON
MG/L SODIUM
MG/L POTASSIUM
-------
8AMPLC AND MANAGEMENT
CPA-rsn. PEG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA H*.»U1#T«
REMARK| NATION*!, GROUNDWATER SURVY
REMARK I
SAMPLB LOG VERIFIED RYl TRB SAMPLE DATA verified BY I CKB
•••REMARKS***
R-QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT OAT A ARE UHUSEAtiLE
K•COMPOUND WAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND BEANALYSIS 16 NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
an
411
8U
07/30/8* MCTtlS 5J
DATA REPORTING SHEET J"
W»TE* J
af xarii-'vis 6*«Ptfc TiPet i»u>J*L
MA
21U
J5P
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PROGRAM E'.EMCNTI RCRA 5PU
SOURCE! AMERICA* CYANAMlD J",
CITY| MILTON statej rt, 40U
STATION I.D.I MW.21 DISSOLVED mKt*L (SAME AS SAMPLE •12282) NA
STORET STATjON NOI {»
sample collection! start datk/ttmf "3/03/56 i«u
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP RATE/TTME 00/00/00
COLLECTED SYI RSCCTyED FRO*! nA,«u
SAMPLE PEC'DI DATE/TIME 00/00/0" RtC'D BY I 2a35k
SEALED! 82
NA
MA
N A
10U
1HU
N A
anuo
1300
21
CHEMIST! GK» „ „
ANALYTICAL METHODI 9.04u
:ASE KO.I 1111 ORG 6AMPLR NOl D INOKG SAMpLE NP,I MD 7ft
1 TC)|
VNIC) !
CONTRACl LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 2.SU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(iNORGANf
•••footnotes***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE #NA-NoT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
#J"E5TlHATED VALUE *N-PRESIlMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be lfss than value givfn
•l-actual value is known to re greater THAN value given
•U-MATERIAL WAS analyzed for B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER 15
THE MINIMUM DETECTION MMIT.
UNITS
UG/U
uc/l>
UG/b
VG/Z
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
VIG/L
Ug/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
IKj/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ug/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
lilEXEHt
SILVER
ARSENIC
BOHQN
BAMJ UM
UERYbblUM
CADMIUM
CnbAiT
C HKC
COVPt,!*
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAil
ANTIMONY
6ELENIU*
1IW
5TH0NT1UM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIKCONHIM
MEKCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANCSi.
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
AAHPLC AN O ANALYSIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
NALYSIA MANAGED
RPA-RSn»RRG XV
ATHENS GEORGIA
RESULT
911
07/30/86 DATA REPORTING SHEET 2?U
WATER ||J
lflU
sample «n.{ t?6c129?3 SAwFif-:
NA
270
511
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! PCRA SRU
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMlO 3'' ,
CITY I HILTON STATE! FL JjJU
STATION I.D.I MH-J2 DISSOLVED MFT&L (SAME AS SAMPLE M2206J N»
STORET STATION nui NA
100
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME O3/0*/8ft 1RU
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP PATE/TIME 00/00/00 N«
COLLECTED 8YI RE^ETvED FROMI f!* „
SAMPLE REC'Dl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY! 0.04U
SEALED.
CHEMIST! GKB ?'
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NQ*I nil ORG SAMPLE NO! D INORG SAMPLE NO.t MD 5fto
CONTRACt LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I 2,5U
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC) I
REMARKS NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•~•REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES**#
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NoT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be lfss than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE 18 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•IMMATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUHRER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
•••••ANALYTICAL RG8U
UNITS
ua/u
ELEMENT
SI4.VEP
ug/l
ARSENIC
ug/l
BOHOH
ug/l
BARIUM
UG/L
BEHYLLIUM
UG/L
CADMIUM
COBAUT
r . i, c i * """
ug/L
COl»PtK
ug/l
MOLYBDENUM
ug/l
NICKEL
UG/L
LEAS
UG/L
ANl'IKOHY
ug/l
SELENIUM
OG/L
TIN
UG/L
STHONT1UM
HG/L
TELLURIUM
UG/L
TITANIUM
UG/L
THALLIUM
UG/L
VANADIUM
UG/L
YTTRIUM
UG/L
ZINC
UG/L
XIHCUN1UM
UG/L
mehcuhy
UG/L
aluminum
UG/L
manganese
MG/L
CALCIUM
MG/L
MAGNESIUM
MG/L
IRON
MG/L
SODIUM
mg/L
POTASSIUM
-------
A t> a MALyAj« m*nj»ck«ent s*stcm
rp*»Esn,np;(; I v
ATMCWS CrOBGIA
ota»o/.6 -T«gS^5
n*T* REpSftTlMC * HEUT
WATCP
SAfcHLfc NO,I PftCl?9?0 S ^rtP L K TUPfcl PF • i] K6"<£t.L
PROJECT NO.| R6»306 PROGRAM ETjE' KRO*«|
SAMPLE PEC 1DI DATE/TIME no/tO/00 REC'D BY!
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CKB
analytical methodi
ASE NO. J lilt OPG SAMPLE NO! 0 INORG SAMPLE NH.I MD
ONTRACT LABORATO«Y(ORGANlC>!
CONTRACT LABORATORYfINORGANIC)I
REMARKi NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY t TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I GKB
•••REMARKS#*#
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
((¦RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS 18 NECES8AR* fOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES#**
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA"NQT ANALYZED *NAI"INTERFERENCES
•0»ESTIMATED VALUE »N.PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACtuAt value is KNOWN to fe less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE is known to be greater than value given
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER 18
THE minimum PETECTION LIMIT,
¦tSULIl
9rt
«u
MA
21 U
an
4(1
1BU
SJl:
an
MA
27U
3U
bRU
bU
4nu
HA
tih
MA
mu
mu
NA
11 U
NA
0.7R
7*U
44
lit
h4
2.SU
UNITS
1IC/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
*«»**«hALVTXCAlj MES
S1LVKR
ARSENIC
BOHON
BARIUM
BEHYLiIilUH
CADMIUM
COBAL.T
fcoPPEH
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STKnNTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Z1KCUN1UM
mekcubi
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
-------
SAIPhE J>Kt> ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CPA-E8n,BEG IV
»THKMS CFORCIA
07/30/16
METALS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
'.'0,! 86C17997
SAMPLF TYPE! PROCESWELL
PROJECT *0.1 8t>-J06 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
sourcpi amerxc an cyanamid
CITY I MTLTON STATE I FL
STATION X.D.I Pf-4 t)UP DISSOLVE!' METAL (SAMF. AS SAMPLE #12290)
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION START PATE/TTMf 03/03/Bb
SAMPLE COCLEcnONI STOP date/timf 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYl RECEIVED FROMJ
SAMPLE REC'OI DATE/TIME 0
-------
WAMMOC * II AfAf.VSln **N*OKMrNT SYSTEM
r»»A-r:«M, fr.rs i v
»THUHfl GFopGtA
HET%L8 _
oat* RffpORTlNR SHCFT
w*re»
5AMUf ^ jo^ » 0 a#-» i ^ o"»o c » v i>t r tvnvi
PROJECT NO, I B6-306 PROGRAM Et.EMENT I RC*»A
SOURCE I AKER1C AN CYaWUMJp
CITY I MILTON STATEl rL
STATION 1,0, » Lns-2 DISftOLVEU MKT i*L CSA*E AS 5A»"PLE « 1229b)
STOFtT ST&rl0'< Mt.ii
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME nj/03/fl6
SAMPLE" COLIiFCTION > STOP r>ATE/T TUP Oo/OO/OO
Collected byi pecetvec from
'Ample RKC'hi datf/ti"K nn/nn/oo Ptc'D Put
SEALED I
CHEMIST! GKR
ANALYTICAL MtTHOOl
CASE NO, I nil ORG SAMPLE N(l| n } NPRG SAX PLE NO, I MO
CONTRACT LAHORATORY(ORfjANIC) I
CONTRACT LARO»ATORY(INOR«ANIC)|
REmARKi NATIONAL GHOUNOWaTE" StIRVFY
KEMABKt
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY| TUB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY( GKB
• »#R|£MaRKS*»*
••~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «nA-n0T ANALYZED •NAI-INTEREERtNCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PBSSUWPTTVF EVIDENCE UF PRESENCE OF material
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS known TP BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
«l»actihl value is known to be greater than value given
•U-MATERIAL was ANALYZED fob but not DETECTED a THE number is
TrtF MlNIMllv DETECTION MmIT,
RCnubTS
vn
«n
N »
96
211
411
1SU
2PIM
1 5 01) J
N A
27U
51'
71
Sti
40U
tit,
tiH
'¦ik
lnu
1BU
N A
240
MA
u.au
7
-------
SAMPLE AND AWAI.Yrtl* »ANACEME>il SYSTEM
KPI-CSD.PCC IV
¦theMs GrnnciA
07/30/86 MKT A 1.4
data heporti«g sheet
WATCP
ea-pi.c nc.i z:.'.rir t?pei water
PROJECT WO,l 86-306 PROGRAM ET.E«ENT» RC"A
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITY 1 MILTON STATE! n.
STATIOK 1,0,1 ST-1 DISSOLVED METAL (SAME AS SAMPLE «172<»3)
STuRfcT STATION' ini
sample collection! start oate/ttmf 03/03/r<>
SAMPLE COLLECTION j STOP DaTK/TTMF no/00/00
C0LLECTF1> 8V I »»CC£TvF:D rPO'U
SAMpLF Ptcni uate/time no/no/nn oecd pyj
SCALCDl
CHEMIST I GKB
ANAL*TICA». METHOD I
CASE NO, I 1111 ORG SAMpi.E NO« n INOHC, SAMPLE ND,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATuPY(OBGAnIC)I
CONTRACT LAPORATORYfINORGANTOJ
REMARK j NATIONAL GROUNDWATER StJPVF*
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VEBIFIFD BY I T«H KA^PTjE DATA VERIFIED BY! GKB
•••REMARKS###
^•QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT Data ARE UNUSEABt.E
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY MOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•~•FOOTNOTES###
•A-AVEPAGE VALUE #NA«NgT ANALYZED •NAI-lNTEKKERENCES
•J-ESTTMATED VALUE »N-PRESHmPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-acTUal value is known to be lfss Than value givfn
•L-ACTUAL VALUK T6 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THF MINIMUM DETECT!ON T,I"TT.
tSUL-TS
20UJ
4
-------
FfHoFsn.wrc xv
ATHp;ns GFORCIA
07/30/86 HrTILS
DATA REPORTING sheet
WATEW
SAMpT,r ^n#| S^MPLF T*PCi Mrjw«!
PROJECT HO, | 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CY»NAMIr>
CITY I MI LTON STATKl FL
STATION I.D.! MW-5 DISSOLVED MgTAl, fSAME AS SAMPLE I172H3)
8T0RET STATION *01
SAMPLE COLLECTIONi START DATE/TIMF "3/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION| STHP DATE'TI ME "0/00/00
COLLECTED BY I *>E<*ETVFD FRQM1
SAMPLE PEC 'Pi PATE/TIMf; 00/00/00 PtC'O BY t
8EALED|
CHEMISTI GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO, | 1111 ORG SAMPLE NU| n INOKG SAMPLE NO. I MU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)J
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)1
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY t TUB SAMpr,E DATA VERiriFD PYJ GKB
•••REMARKS##*
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATFS that data are UNUSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PflESFNT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•AjAVERAGE VALUE »NA-NqT ANALYZED *NAI"INTERFERENCES
*i!rE?Ii^?ED.y£I;u!L 5S^SPEs^MPTTVF! fvtdence or presence of material
•^actual value is known to be less than value given
*L«ACTUAL value is known TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U»MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOr BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER Is
THE MINIMUM DETECTION UMIT
•••••AN«LYlTC*L RESUbTtt**««>
WfcOUIrTS
«ri
411
N»
2IU
211
41'
1 nu
2 ^ v ^
5 <>o j
NA
27U
J"
5flU
b'l
4ou
NA
i»r
NA
1 nU
5«>
NA
<»oua
NA
U , 65k
lfloo
bU.
0.82U
0.35U
w*
2.SU
UNITS
UG/L
UG/t,
UG/li
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
"G/L
Ou/U
UG/L
(JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ug/l
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/b
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
eitKtu
6ilver
ARfiENIC
8OHON
JkHIUM
BEHYLLiUH
CADMIUM
cobalt
cni»pt.rt '
MOLYBDENUM
MCKEL
LKAJ)
AN1IMONY
6ELENIUM
TI«
STHONTJUM
TELLURIUM
111'ANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIHCONIUM
MEhCUHY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNfcSIUM
1RUN
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
r
t
(
f
(
<
(
<
(
-------
-K!,r JiNAbTSriT »•* DACE-"
EPM.Mn.RKc Iv
XTHtNfl GrOPCIA
07/JO/06
DATA BrpOBTlNO SHEET
HATER
«»««pr.e wn.i P«ri»9i7 tv
PROJECT NO.! 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITVI MILTON ST*TKl PL
STATION 1,0.1 MW-13 DISSOLVED MMAL (SAME AS SAMPLE «122H0)
STORET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TJMF 0J/03/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTION I STOP DATE/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I PHTETVED FRO"I
SAMPLE REC'Dl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D PYI
SEALEDl
CHEHISTI GKB
ANALYTICAL METHOPI
CASE NO,I llll ORG SAMPLE NOl 0 INORG SAMPLE NO,I MU
CONTRACT LA80RAT0RY(0RGANIC)1
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYt GKB
•••REMARKS***
R-OUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT RATA ARE UNUSEAHLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BF PRESENT
R-RESAHPLING AND REANALY8IS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NoT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERrERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LFS8 THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACXUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO ftE greater than VALUE given
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR R"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LI««IT.
.esui.15
vti
1 ou
N »
2(1
4u
JS"
It u
NA
27U
4.1 J
bflU
5"
40U
NA
NA
10U
1»U
M
2 "UO
n *
1.2R
4300
i "so
i:l
t*S
i. 5"
'!» ITS
UCi/U
'JG/li
UG/L
tIG/L
oS/b
UG/k
U(i/L
"i./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
*G/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ELEMENT
STLVtM
ARSENIC
BOHON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHCo.-r:"
CUfPbK
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STKONT1UM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIHCUNXUM
MEHCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESt
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRUN
SODIUM
PPTAgSlUh
-------
m AMptE AND «NAT '
CC'fPfc'K
MOLYBDfcNU*
NICKKL
LEAD
ANTIMUNY
SELENIUM
TIN
3TK0NTJ.UN
TF.LLUH1UM
TIIAnIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
%T kCU*I UN
MEHCURY
aluminum
HAhGAN|£3E
CALCIUM
magnesium
1RUN
SOLIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
07/30/06
DATA HrpSS^i»G SHEET
MOTE"
5 *wr>r.jr #f t TYP(£f
PROJECT NO. I B6-306 PROGRAM ET,EI"ENTI RCRA
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYanA-ITD
CITY I MILTON ST*Te» r£,
STATION 1,0.1 MW-24 PISSOLVED MFTA L (SAME AS SAMPLE M229J)
8T0RET STATtuH VOl
SAMPLE COLLECTIONt START DATE/TT*)" 01/1)3/»6
SAMPLE COLLECT ION t STOP OATE/TIME "0/00/00
COLLECTED BYl njOETvFD FROMi
SAMPLE REC'IIJ DATF/TI^E 00/00/0" PEC'D BY J
SEALEDl
CHEMISTt GKfl
ANALYTICAL METHOOl
CASE N0.« 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI t) INORG SAMPLE Nn,l MO
CONTRACT LARURATORY(PRGA^TC)I
CONTRACT LabDhaTORY(INU1GANJOI
REMARK! NATIUNAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY J TPB SA"PT,E DAT* VERIFIED BY I GKH
•••REMARKS***
R-0"ALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT nATA ARE UNUSEABLE
K-COMPUUNO MAY OH MAY not bF PRESENT
R-RESAMPLINC AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY Fl)R VERIFICATION
»«*••««*••»*»*»»•»*•#•••»»»•••»•»•••»»•«••••••••»•»•«•»•••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-ESTIHATEP VALUE
»K-ACT
•NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•N.PRES'lMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UF MATERIAL
KNOWN T" BE L'SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• K-ACtUAL VAL'JE TS
•L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO PF GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•IMMATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THF MINIMUM DETECTTUN M«IT.
RESULT8
J"UJ
Ml
2"
41)
10U
Sou.?
1«U
Nl
27U
3ll
60
3D
40U
IN A
Hi
H A
lou
l»u
lit
jou J
HA
0.55R
75U
110
\n
3.6
2?
4!S
2.5U
un xxa
UG/b
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UU/L
UG/L
»l(i/L
llti/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
DG/L
UG/L
I'G/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
••ANALYTICAL KC9
CLLMCNT
SILVER
AR5EM4C
BSKSS-
bEKY LlilUM
8aumIum
OBALT
chmom j i>"
COi'PEM
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
AN1IM0NY
SELENIUM
TIN
ST80NTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIKCONIUM
MKHCUPY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
ATHENS C^ORGII
oT/jo/i# __ „5EI^S
DAT* REPORTING SHEET
MATEn
SAMPLE nd.i Br.p 1?«M4 S.'-V. ryr , : "l?;
PROJECT Nfl,| 86-306 PROGRAM EtE«CWTI RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYl MILTON STATEI Fl
STATION I.D.I LCS DISSOLVED MFTAL tlSA^F AS SAMPLE * 1 2297)
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIME OJ/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP OATE/TJwr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED ITR0Mt
t AMPLE REC'OI DATE/TIME 00/00/00 RKC'n 0K1
EAt.EDi
CHEMIST! GKR
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! D INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKi
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB RAMpiE DATA VERIFIED BYt GKb
•••REMARKS###
r-quality control INDICATES THAT OATA ape unuseabt.e
R-COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES*#*
•A»AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NQT ANALYZED •NAI-INTEREERENCES
•J-ESTTMATEn VALUE *N«PRES"MPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value ts known to pe less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THF. MINIMUM DETECTION LImIT.
Hcaui'Ts
VII
X ou
N A
JR
411
NA
27U
S'l
5»U
SI'
4 OU
NA
N >V
N A
10U
1RU
NA
4 0UJ
fJS
iP
810
2 H 0
7.4
1.8
a.o
o
*.8
ELGMbhl
SILVER
ARSENIC
BOHON
BAHIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHHnf
COl'PbM
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STKONTIUM
tellurium
titanium
THALLIUM
VAMAUIUM
YT'lRIUM
ZINC
ZIHC0N1UH
MEHCUHY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRUN
SODIUM
pnlASSlUM
-------
«7/JO/«6
MRItLt
DATA BrpORTl»C 8HEBT
WATER
sa«plc s*<*Pir rrpr:
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROfikAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOUPCEl ALBICAN CYANAMTD
CITY I MILTON STatei *i
STATION I.D.I FIELD BL.K DISSOLVFD METaL (SAME AS SAMPLE H1228R)
STORET STATION NOJ
SAMPLE COLLCCTinNI START DATE/TTnK 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TTMT 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY| PETETVED FROM|
SAMPLE BEC'Dl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D B*l
SCALED|
CHEM18TI GKH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO,I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOt n INORG SAMPLE NO,I ML)
CONTRACT L ABU RATC3PYC ORGANIC)!
CONTRACT LABORATOWY(INORGANIC) 1
REMARKl NATIONAL GKOUNDWaTEP survey
REMARKl
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I T*B PA"PLE DATA VERIFIED BY S GKB
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES**#
•A-AVERAGE VALUE "NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERE"CES
•J-ESTtMATED VALUE *N-PRE8UmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UF MATERIAL
•k-acTual value is known Tn pc less than value given
•L-aCTUAL VALUE IS known Tn BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED TOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION T,I"IT.
....•ANALYTICAL KEB
AbnurTS
1 1
411
NK
210
ill
kr
1QU
NA
27U
5n
5RU
JM
4nu
N*
NS
N A
10U
1RU
NA
11U
N1
0.5b
22U
U.B2U
0.37
0.82
4*
2, 5U
UHITI
IJG/Li
UC/L
US/L
VO/L
ua/u
US/b
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/L
MG/L
MG/L
KLUMLNT
SILVEK
AR&CMC
BORON
BAKIUH
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CObALT
chkoh ; '
COPPKH
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STHOnTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MEKCuRY
aluminum
MANGANESE
calcium
magnesium
IRUN
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
SfwrNS ' &POPCIA
Of/JO/86 METALS J!U
DATA RCPORTZNC 8HERT 270
NATCH 2|t
tu
AAMpf.p wn, t *$n?9M type* PC SAHPir
»w
47
Ht
27U
53
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PPOflHAM ELEMENTI RCRA 5»U
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID 20
CITY I MILTON ST ATE I fh 40U
N A
STATION I.O.I pE SET DISSnliVEn MET At, (SAME PS SAMPLE 112294) N«
STOPET STATION hut tu
7IJ
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START HATS/TIME 03/u3/fl6 1*0
SAMPLE COLLECTI^NI STOP DATE/TTME 10/00/00 N»
11 U
COLLECTED bV| RECEIVED FRU«| N»
SAMPLE REC,r»« pvj'E/TIME 00/00/00 PEC'D H K i o. 2U
SEALED! 7 i U
CHEMISTI GKB u"l)7U
ANALYTICAL METHOD I o!j5U
0,0«U
CASE NO,I 1111 ORG SAMPLE Noj D INORG SAMPLE MO.I MD 0.54
CONTRACT LABOHATQPY(ORGANIC)I i!SU
CONTRACT laborATOOKtINORGANIC)J
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER 8URVFY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED RYt TPH SAMPTE DATA VERIFIED BYI GKB
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•a-avepage VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•^"ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTTVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•f-MJiH*** W'S Is 5P0WN Tn BE lpss Than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOr BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER 18
THE MINIMUM OETECTIQm IjIMIT,
LIN XT e
USJ t
S&t
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
DG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
&I1iVSp
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BCHYLL1UM
CADMIUM
COBALT _
cnVt>a.N
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
'tT.'.zcrAX.ZZZ-rQ--™-
ATHENS CrOHGIA
iu
07/J0/86 _ _ >UVWI. 3f
p AT A RrpOMT^Sc SHEET 2.1U
HATER 2»l
«*"PIK 'JO#t ««rl?9*3 S * MPl«r TYPE* r-CAK DFTPTC
4U
t;°
1QU
N A
37,u
PROJECT NO,| 96-306 PROGRAM ET.E"ENTI RCPA SHU
80URCFI AMERICAN CYANAMIO &TI
CITY I MILTON STaTEi r\, 4nu
M
STATION I.U.I LOS-1 DISSOLVED mET«L (SAMfc AS SAMPLE «12296J NA
STURET STATION fcni Ht
7D
SAMPLE COLLECTION j START DATE/TIME Oj/03/86 1»U
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONj STOP DATE/TTmF 00/00/00 N»
14
COLLECTED »yi RECETvED FPOMt N»
SAMPLE PEC'Dl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'" BY I 0.55
SEALED! 7sU
bU
CHEMIST! GKfi 0.82U
ANALYTICAL METHOOi 0.J5U
0.O4U
CASE NO.I 1111 OPC SAMPLE NO| 1) INORG SAMpLE NO.I Ml) 0.52U
CONTRACT LABORATiJPY(ORGAnIC)I 2,5"
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC) I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKl
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY« T«0 !SA*P!,E DATA VERIFIED BY I GKU
•••remarks*#*
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A«AVERAGE VALUE «na-Nqt ANALYZED *NAI«INTP:rFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED value •N-PRESUmPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-acTual value is known td re Ufss than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
UN ITS
UU/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC^l<
UC/L
va/u
UG/L
'¦'G/Z
UG/L
UG/L
tJG/b
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
«G/L
MG/L
MC/L
Kl.k.MCNT
SILV£R
arScmic
BOKON
UAHZUM
UEKILLIUM
CADMIUM
COBAIT
^ . , . x - " ' "
SuPPbM^
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
Z1KCUNIUM
MEhCUHY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
-------
ii—F.Sn* ^
ATHENS GEORGIA
0T/I7/H PUROCAXLE nnSINlC* ANALIB1S
CJI TC«
SAMPLE HO.t «6C132*2 «AHPI,E TrPtl xo**r.
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM CtCMCNTt RCRA
- SOORCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
cirri milton sr»Tct n
STATION I.D.I MW.19,01110,MOA01O
5TORCT STATION NO I
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 01/05/66
SAMPLE COLLECTION! stop DATE/TIM* 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED TROMl
SAMPLE. REC 'r>! DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BYl
SEALED I
CHCMISTl CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASENO.11111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG. SAMPLE NO.t *D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LAR0RAT0RY(INORGANIC)I
—REMARKINATIDSAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TBB 8AWPT.E DATA VERIFIED BYI CHH
•**REMARKS*««
•••rOOTNOTES***
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS known TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACmt VAtuI IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VlLUE GIVEN
•u-mateRial was analyzed roR but not detected, the number ts
the h!n!SM quantitation limit.
¦ ••••ANALVf tCA>< HRSUUTS*****
nKSUtTa UN TT8
1OU UG/L
1 flu
f«a
w
S-.
su
Hi
i::
SS
is
5"
5U
5U
10U
5"
5"
1"U
5T1
3"
511
511
l'G/L
-V&'Ar
SS^fc
W,l
vq/u
UC/b
w,t
UG/L
UG/L
UC/E
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
l'G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Coir
npSisHEalltlSsii'
TRAN5-1 ,2-OlCHLOi-O,
VLi l-P»CMLOKO«*H*liCHC
OXCHLO^UCTHEmc.
ETHANE
IROETHKWC
HLOH1DE
)METHANK
hSoropropehe
CARBON TCtf
BROMODICHLt ,
TRlCHLUROETHENE(TKlCHkUROtlHXLk.Nt)
BENZENE
IjpsssjWBispiiiasr-— -
CI$-1 jJ-DICHLUROpHQHENE
2-CHLOROeTHYLVINXL CTHtR
BRUMQrORM
1,1»2"TETRACHL0H0ETHANE
Tbf RACnLORUETHENE I TETRAD HliUROETHXLENE)
TOLUENE
chlorobenzeni;
Ethyl Benzene
TOTAL XYLENES
(
-------
PDROCAKLC ORCAWtra XMLr«t>
MATE*
£*««PT,B MO. I SAMPLF TYPE I
SRQdECT NO, I B6-J06 PROGRAM ET.EMENTI RCRA
oUrcekamerican cyanamid
CITY I MtLTON STATE« FX
STATION I .D.I MW-20.01102#NQA002
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATE/TIME 03/03/96
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIM* O0/o5/00
COLLECTED BYt RECEIVED FRO"I
SAMPLE REC'O! DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BYl
SEALED!
CHEMlSTt CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
_CASE NO.I .1111 .ORG SAMPLE NO! D INORG SAMPLE NO.! MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)!
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
»A-AVERACE VALU„
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE
__ *N»PRe8umPTI^E EVIDENCE or pSISencI Sf MATERIAL
•K-ACTtlAli VALUE IS KNOWN TO Br LESS THAN VALUE CIVKN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE fS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE dlVEN
•D-material was analyzed roR swf Rot detected, the number is
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION llMlt,
COMPOUND 1
CNLOHOMETHANC I
istapsi"——- h
1;
TPlvS-I.S-UICMliORfET.'irMr
CHLOHOKOHH
1,2-DXCHLOROETHANK
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHKNE
CArbun tetkachlohidi:
brqmqdichlorqmEthah-
1,2-DICHLafiQPHOPANg
TftANS-I,3-OICHLOROf
in«ib" I f j"im;n4iLmurR0PENE
T" 1 CHLOPOCTHfcNt ( THICHLiOROCTHItLtNt )
4ANC
HLOKOPROPf
•3-OICHLOi
FQETHfcNt('i
nr.nit.Ni
PIBflgMyChLOROMETHAKK
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
ClS-i,3»DICHLOHOPKOPENfc
2«CHLOH0ETHYLVJNYl< ether
HROMOrORM
1»1» 2»2"TETRACHL0R0ETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENf (TCTKACHLORCICTH YLCIl )
fniiUENE
CHLDf
-------
I n>>SiES¥f3i?iDV^kl!fiE ^•N#2^S8SM^?ilIZI?IDB»1C#gA{rI«g8Eg?rgrC8MATERIAL
•((•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO Br LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-aCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
¦¦-¦-WlHW.'M.MttHBi.'SM!!s®' *™ "u6'" "
>.«>aN«LITIC*l' HKSUi,Ta«***<
UNITS COMPOUND
UG/L CHbOBQMCTHANE
--|{S<»—
/ yiRyl CHLORIDE"
HQ/J CHLOHOiTHANE
" ~ .n»n_
NGd^t-OZCHLOHOETHXtilCNC)
UG/i METHYLENE CHLORIDE
VQ/ i 1,1*DICHLORoEtHENG(
ng/L I,I-dichloro|th*ne
Uu ' ij ICKuOr -»*/it**4
UG/L CHLOROfOHM
IIG/L 1,5-pICHLOROETHANK
tIG/L i. IiI-TRICHLOROETHATIK
UG/L CaAbON TiTNACHLORlUE
IIG/L bromodichlorohethane
UG/L 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
UG/L fRANS-I,3-DICHLnRDPHOPENE —
UG/L TRICHLORUETHbNE(lKlCHLUKOGTHYLENt)
UG/L BENZENE
Ijg/j, DIBROMOCHLOROMETMANE
UG/fc 2-CHL0f»OETHYLVINlL ETHER
BROMOFORM
,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
16-i,J-UICHLOhOPKOKKNE
.-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ethep
UG/L DRUMOFORM
UG/L 1»1»2»2"TETRACHLORQETHAWE
UG/L TETRACHLOROETHENE(XETRACftLURUETHgLENbj
UG/L TOLUENE
UG/L CHLOROBENZENE
UG/L ETHYL BENZENE
UG/L TOTAL XYLENES
-------
07/17/06
PUROEA01.C OROANXC* ANALYSIS
water
ctvptr nc.s sr.r.rir tintt mo'jul
PROJECT NO.i 86-306 PROGRAM CLEMENT I RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
cityi milton statei *%
STATION I.D.l MW-22,QilO7#MQAO07
STORET 8T*TlON NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TINE OJ/04/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TINE 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY| RECEIVED FRO* I
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D R*l
SEALED!
"CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
—CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE MOI D -INORG SAMPLE NO.I HD
CONTRACT LABORATOPY(ORGANIC)! .
CONTRACT LABORATORYfINORGANIC) I
—REMARKiNATlONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TUB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
™ • • t R E N A R K S * • •
••~FOOTNOTES***
" ~ TS
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LgSS THAN VALUE CIVFN
lLErzrD;ro0RBiyfgs?ERDETT^NTEvDtL?5^"-''
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
IVEN
NUMBER IS
compound — ' I
chldhomethane
«?8?EM*£m>E — f*
^xn*E"CfiCoKIl>ir
CHLOKOETHAME
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
Wi«DtCHLORO|THCNE(l(l-DJCHLURUETH*LCAE)
1J1"DICHL0R0ETHANE
TRANS-! »5-OICKLORt»FTHK«r
CHLOHOFOHM
1,2-uichloroethane
1. 1| 1-TRICHLOROETHANC
CARfON TETRACHLORIDE
BrumudichloromIthamk
1,2-pICHLOROPRUPANE
TRANS-It3-DICHL0ROPR0PENE
TRICHLUROETHKNCCXKICHLURUCI'H YLbNt)
BENZENE
WIBRUHOCHLOROMBTHAWe
1,1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHAME
CI6-1i3«DICHLOKOPH0I>ENE
2-CHLOHOETHYLVINYL ETHfcR
BRUHOfURH
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOHOETRANE
TETRACHLQROETHENE Ufcl'RACHLORUETH KIjENK )
TOLUENE
CHLOKOBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
rp*-r«r>, fcg rv
ATHENS ftropci*
PUR6EAHLE ORCA"ICS ANALYSIS
Ptf
MATER
~•••rir *!".» r.±Ci?7*9 5AMPLe TYPEI PKOCrSWEM,
PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
statei ri
fBOJBCT NO.I 86-306 P
OOFCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYI MILTON
STATION I.D.I PW-4,01111,MQA011
STORET STATION NOl
•AMPLE COLLECTION! START r>ATE/TlM* 0J/05/86
SAMPLE COILfCTIONI STOP DATE/TIMr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FROMl
Sample pec'di date/time oo/oo/oo rec'd byi
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL »*
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NQl D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I .
CONTRACT LARORATORYfINORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKI
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
•••REMARKS***
••*••••««•••••••«»••«*••••••«•««•*«•••«•*••••••«•••*•••••••**««•
•••FOOTNQTEg***
•k»actual value rs known to be ...
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS known to be gREATEH THAN
•U-MATERIAL WAS analyzed for but ROT DETECT
The minimum quantitation mmit.
yess than value
-\N VALi
:ted.
Jber ts
compound - I
chloromethank I
— ^
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
~ DICHbURUETHyLENE)
l § in
CHLOHOrOHM
1,2-plCHLOROETHANfc
1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE—
Cah6on tetrachloride
BRUMODICHLQRuMbTnANE
1,2-DICHLOKOPROPANE
TRANS-IfS-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRlCHLORQETHENbtTKICHLURUETHYLtNb)
BENZENE
JlBROMOCHt'ORfl METHANE
i,2-¥r|chlo>oe5hane
o-i»3-DKHlOHOPRQFENE
CHLOROeTHYLVINYL ether
0RUMOFURM
lili '4t2-TETRACHL0K0El'HANE
TElRACHLOROETHENEC TETRACHLUROETHf LfcftE)
TOLUENE
chlorouenzene
ethyl benzene
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
07/17/16 PURGEABIifT ORBAWICS analysis
HATE"
SA'TT «»l)lCHliOHlie. i rtfcnfc.
CHLOROFORM
J , 2-DICHLOKOETHANK
1.1.1-trichloroethane
carbon TETfiACHLOfUDt
BRUMODICHLURQmEtHANIE
I.2-pICHLOHOPHUPANfc
tbanS-T.j-dichlohuphopene
TBlCHLOBOElHENttrHlCMLUHLjlCiHKIjtNt )
bFlNZENfc.
DlbRUMOCHLURQMtTHANG
1.1.2-TRICHLUROGtHAnE
CI6-1,J-DICHLUHOPKOFtNE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYi, tTHER
bro^oforR
IlIi it2-TEIRACMLOHOfe'THANE
TEiRACnLUROETHENEl 1 tTHACHLUHUfcTHlLft)
TDLUENt
CHLOROBENZfcNK
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
»»«pr,ic amo «»mce»e»T system
EP».rJn,»ge iv
ATHENS ownACTA
07/17/tfe PURCEABtC OR6ANXC6 ANALYSIS
WATER
SAMPLE TYPcj T.eAK DKTtfC
PROJECT 1X0,1 86-306 PROGRAM Er.EMENTl RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY! MTLTON 8TATE»
STATION I.O.I lir>S-2fQl 1 18.MQA018
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIM* 03/06/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TI"E 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECETVED TROMi
SAMPLE REC'OI DATE/TIME 00/00/00 PEc'n BK|
SCALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTIC
AL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! D INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LAR0RAT0RY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
«»*remarks»«*
•••FOOTNOTES***
#J»ESTf MAtId*^Al6e •N-PRE8(SMPT?^2E?IDENCE*5fIPRE^NciN8f8MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GrVrN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE CIVEN
»U-MAT|RIAL was analyzed FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE HINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
ALiY'ltCAl* MtBUu AO""""*
COHPOUND
chlohuhcthanc
WHMH~
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1 , !»DICH|,OMoETHENE( J fI-DICHLOHOEIH* LENL)
,2-UXCHLOROETHANE
" '-TRICK
_ __Cf ,
i-QICHLOPOETHANE
A^&*11 5*0 tCHLORUb• i.
c
|.l,l-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON tetrachloride
BRWODICHLORUMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPRQPANK
TPANS-I.3-OICHLOHaPRQPENE
TRaCHLOROETHiNECTRlCMLUROETHKlitNt J
BENZENE
DIBRUMQCHLQROMETHANE
111'2-TRICHLOROEIHANfi
CI6-1,5-DICHLOHOPROHENE
2-CHLOROkTHYLVINXIj ETHfcR
brCmoform
l»I#2»2-TETRACHL0H0eTHANE
ffclRACHLOROriHENt ITtTKACHLUHUK'iMXl.ENt)
TOLUENt
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
j *rWBWan&^owciA
Ol/lf/96 PUWOEABLE ONGA*|gS ANALYSIS
SAMPLE Mn( | 06CJ>2«»3 SAftrLi, Tr i,
PROJCCT HO.l 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RCRA
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
cityi milton aT*TE« fl
3TATI0N 1,0.t Sr-ltQlll$,MO«015
STQRET STATION NO I
SAMPLE C01LECTT0NI START DATE/TTMF 0J/06/R6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED 8Y| RECEIVED FR0»l
SAMPLE REC'Pl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 PEC'D RYl
SEALEDl
CHEMIST! CHH
analytical «
methodi
8ASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I md
ONTRACT LABORATORYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LARORATORY(INORGANlC)l
REMARKi NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
sample log verified byi tph sample data verified byi chh
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTES**#
-.;i*8*fp,,vWr .5!{;SS?HMfM85?I»F«?8,{;,Si!ESE5?rcof5«.TE«M,
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 18 KNOWN TO Bf LFSS THAN VALUE GIVfN
•I-ACTIJAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE dlVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
• ••••ANALYTICAL HK8UL.Tb*«®*«
PESUI'TS
1 ou
iOU
IOU
iou
Jou
fill
5n
«~'
SVY
in
SI!
511
bli
5"
Sll
5M
5'1
5n
ISM
5"
lnu
bii
5"
5i)
5"
UN I TS
i icy u
. v'G/U _
uC/b
VG/L
UG/L
"G/L
i;g/l
''V'V
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
ug/L
"G/L
UG/L
UC/L
'•C/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
tlG
jOHDntTMAVt
_ i*£M5SE8JJSDe : :
chloAoEtHanb
=.... —Jl0gJB(
Ethei«i:(i ( i«oichlurcicthxlh:hC)
_ £TmA«C
_ jICHLnRUfcTHI5l»E
CMLOHOfORM
J,2»lUCHLOROETMAI»li
(1.1-TRICHLOROETHAMfc
Xrbun tetrachloride
BROMODICHLOROMfcTHANK
l,2-DICHLOROl>HUPANIi
fftANS-i,3-UICHL0RUPH0PENE
TRiCHLl)ROETHENE(THXCHLUHOKTHl(LfcNK)
BENZfcNK
UlbROMUCHLOROHtTHANe
1,1,2-TPICHLuRUEIHANE
CIS-I. J-DlCHLnROi'KOI'ENE
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
bromofurm
lili?i2-mRACHL0R0ETHANE
fETRACHLUROPTHENtlTt.rRACHl.URUKTHid.tNi;)
TOLUENE
chlorobenzene
EThYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
SilMPtE AMD AWjhtiYfflff MaMACEMKMT flVSTft
MiNltCEMI
vPjk-p: in^Rgc fv
• THItWIf CKSrCK
07/17/86 PURGKABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
MATgw
samplp no.i «6Ci?a«s samplt rrrr.t "r"vr.
PROJECT WO.I 96-J06 PROGRAM ELEMENTI RCRA
SOURCEl AMERICAN CY ANAMID
CITY I MILTON 8TATC1 FL
STATION I.D.I MW-5, <11104, MQA004
STORET STlTlON NO I
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIN*' 0J/04/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED HY| RECEIVED FROMt
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC«0 RYl
SEALED I
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL methodi
INOPG SAMPLE NO,! *D
CASE NO. I Ull ORG SAMPLE N0| D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK J NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYI CHH
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTES**#
--.3ifi?!M?b'«i!Sr .r.fSSlHM?i(Pie!oE«?E,S;IS5?855?rco5s».TI:„,l,
•k-actual value is known to be less than value given
•L-ACTUAL value is known to be SreaTER than value given
•U-BaTERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR jjt'T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LI^IT,
ALYTICAL Ka.0Ut,ra**»«»
LunruuMu
CHLOHOMCTHANE
??8?gM£SE8fifor-
CHUORDCTHKNC
methylene chloride
1' 1-BiCH1'§HOCTMAHC11' la>DtCMllUKUI,:,N,(bGNl']
rf< n.'.eil # ^-KicHLoIlutiHeNE
CHLOMOKOHM
it
2-DICHLOHOtTHANK
1,1-TRIcHLOROETHANE
BBON TETHACHLOHIDK
BRpMODICHLQRO^ETHANC
l.i-DICHLOROpROPANK
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TR1C HLUPOETHENfc( IK iCHLiUKUEl H ILtNfc )
BENZENfc
DlbROMOCHLUROMETHANt;
1,1.2-TRICHLQROETHANE
C16 -1. 3-DIC HLOKOPHOCKNi:
2-CHLOKOETHYLVINib ETHER
BRUMUFURM
liil2»2-TETRACHLORO£THA»E
TETHACHLOROETHtNElltlHACHbUROtlHKbEUt)
TOLUKNfc
CHLOHOBENZENb
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
5AMt>LE' KMn
ANALYftXA «*M*OC«CWT
cp<>rsn,wrc iv
ATHENS GPTORCSXA
avareM
07/1?/•« PUBGCAPLE 0RGAN£CS ANALYSIS
Ci-Tje S6C i 7 2*0 SAMPLE TYPei MONWL
SRQ.JECT NO,I 86-306 PPnGRAK CLEMENT I RCRA
0UBCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I HILTON STaTEI rt,
STATION I.D.I MW-1J,01121,MOA021
STORET STATION NQI
SAMPLE COLLECTIONl START DATE/TIME OJ/03/16
• AMPLE COLLeCTIONI STOP DATE/TIM* O0/00/O0
COLLECTED BYl RECEIVED FROM I
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BYl
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO. I UU ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORC SAMPLE NO. I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(IWORGANIC)i
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TBB SAMPLE DATA VERiriEO BYl CHH
•««remarks*»»
••#FOOTNOTES»»»
•K-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual value is known to be greater than value given
_•u-material was analyzed roR but not detected, the number is
the MINIMUM quantitation LIMIT,
UNITS tunruuinu
UG/L CHLOHOMGTHAN
Wb
UG/L CHLOHOETHAMC
-111
DE
UG/L METHYLENE CHLORIDE
UG/L 1 « {••PXCHbORQCTHENK11« i«01CHLUKUETH YLKNK)
t'G/L I,I-DICHLOROETHANE
UG/ti THANS-I, J-OICHi,aJ«:i£THfcM,-
UG/Li CHLOROFORM
" ' - THANK
"S'P li 2*UICHL0K0C1
UC/L 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
UG/L CAKBQN TETRACK -
_ _ _ ;mlohioe
ug/l hrumodichloromEthane
UG/L l,i5-PICHL0HaPR0PANE
UG/L TAanS-I.S-DICHLOHUPHOPtNE
UC/L TRICHLOBOETHENfcClKiCHLllRUei'HKLfcNfc)
UC/L HRNZENb
UG/L UIBRyMOCHLOROMETHANE
UG/L Itl,2-TPICHLOROETHANE
UC/L CI6-1,3-DICHLOHOPHUFfcNt
UG/L 2-CHLOfiOETHYEviNYL kThER
UC/L tfROMyrORM
UG/L 1,1.2»2-TETRACHLOROETHANe
UG/L TETPACHLOHOETHENEl Iti'HACHLORUtlUJf Iitwt)
UG/L TOLUENt
UG/L CHLOHOBENZENE
UG/L ETHYL BENZENE
ug/l total xylenes
-------
PUROrAMLE
-PLC K-1.1
*«C1?2*7
ANALYSIS
SAMPLE TX?et
MONWJ
PROJECT NO.i S6-306 PROGRAM El/t^ENTl RCRA
SOURCEI AMERICA* CYANAMID
CITYl MILTON ST»TEl rj,
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIN'1' OJ/05/«6
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONi STOP DATr./TIMr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRO* I
SAMPLF REC«n| DATE/TIKE 00/00/00 RCC *D PIf t
SEALED J
CHCMI9TI CHH
ANALYTICAL METHODl
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE N0| D INHRG SAMPLE NO.I «D
CONTRACT LABORATQPY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT t,AnORATORY(INOR(;*HICjl
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK I
• AMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB SA"Pt,E DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•K.ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO B| LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•Ij-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO p£ GREATER THAN VALUE dlVE"
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER 15
THE MINIMUM OUANTITATTON MMIT.
r T ICAL BRAULTI
COHPUUND
CH^OMOHCTMANt
VI - _
CHl*OHO_ __
H^THYbKNC CHbORIOB
lnruuriu
4LnHUMCTMANk;
$?£"§528SfDe
JbOHOCTHAMC
CHLnROfOMM
1 ,2-UICHLOKOETHANE
I. i rI-tpichmJroetmane
CAHBON TETRACHLORIDE
BRUMOUlCHLURUMeTHANt
ifi^N^^!(2oiCHLojlo!'HOPENE
TRICHLURGEXHfcNfcCTHKHLURUEXHll.tNt)
BENZENE
PIbRUMOCHLURUMCTHANE
1,1,2-TR1CHL0R0ETHANE
CI6-1tJ-DICHLOHOPKOPENE
2-CHLOROtTHYLVINIL CTHtR
BROMUFORM
IlI'2»2-TEXRACHL0H0EIHANE
TElRACHLOROFIHKNttltl'HACHliURUKTHlfLfcNt)
TClLUfcNfc
CHLOkOBENZENK
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
s«Mpr.r avo system
rpa.rsn.wgc IV
ATHENd GrnnctA
07/17/§6 PURCCARLe ORG*"irs ANALYSIS
WATEB
SAMPLE NCI. I " F ~Y"E I *!'•:•-»•
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCEl AUtPlCAU CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATE I »"L
STATION I.D.I HW-24,0\113,HQA013
6T0RET STATiON *0!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIMIC 0J/05/«6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIM* 00/00/00
COLLECTED HYI RECEIVED FROM I
SAMPLE REC'Hl DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'O BY I
SEALGDi
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE N0l D INPRG SAMPLE NO.! mo
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)!
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
8AMPLE LDG VERIFIED BY! TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
••^remarks***
••«F00TNUTE5«**
•A-AVERAGI VALUE *NA-N(JT ANALYZED #NAI»INTERFERENCE8
•j-ksTimatId value *N-PRES<)Hp|riVr evidence of presence or material
•k-actual value is KNOWN TO Be less than value given
•l-actual value IS KNOWN to be greater than value GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL was ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE minimum QUANTITATION LIMIT,
ANALYttCAL HCSUtT»*«»«*
COMPOUND
CHLOHOHCTHANE
CHLOHONC1HANE
§;S?g^SE8BfDi:
chloroethanc
chloriok
IKOCT
r JtTHENKdf 1-DlCHLUHUETHXbfcwE)
Lordethane
_ 2*DICMLOMUETHEN^
CHLOHOfORM
1,2-DICHLOHOETHANt
1t*/1-TRjCHLOROETHAWE
CAMBSn TETHACHLOHIOE
BNDMUDlCHLORUMiTHANi:
1.2-DICHLOROPRQPANE
tpans-I#3-dichloboprope«e
TRlCHLORUGTHEN|£(IKlCHLURUETHYL>tNt)
BENZENE
DIbROMOCHLORUMtTHANE
lti.2-TRICHI.OR5ETHANE
CIS-lf3-DICHLOROPK0PENt.
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER
DRUMorURH
l, 2,2-TETRACHL0R0EXHANE
rRACHLORUCTHtNtllCTHACHLOBUtXMllLENt)
TOLUENE
CHLOHOUENZt'NE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
oi/n/tt, punoEAnLC onajwjcs >n*i.isis
SAMPLE NR.! HfcClJi'*/ SlfiPLr. T'iPti ut-li ' :t,
PROJECT NOi I H6-J06 PROGRAM EfE«ENTI RCRA
AOUPCrt AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYI MILTON ST*TEI fl
STATION l.D.I LCS,Q1116,MQA01S
STORET ST*t!0N HOI
•AMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/07/86
Sample collection! stop date/time n5/oo/oo
COLLECTED BY! RECEIVED FPOMi
SAMPLE PEC'PI DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY I
SEALEDl
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL WKTHOOI
IN0PG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CASE.MO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOi 0
CONTRACf LABORATORY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••remarks###
•••FOOTNOTES###
• A-AVERAGr. VALUE »NA"NqT ANALYZED #NA INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE #N-PPESTJmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PREBENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVrN
*L"ACTUaI, value IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE - J , ^•UICHLUHUlTHElll'
CHlrOHDrDHH
1t2»DICHbOROETHANE
if1.l-TRICHLOROETHAHE
CAHPUN TeTRACHJjOHiUt
BRQMODICHLORQMklTHANK
1,2-DICHLOHOPKOPANfc
TRANS-I#3-DICHLOROPN0PENE
TRICHLURUETH£M£ (TKiCHLUHUElHk LbNt,)
BENZENfc
DIBRU«UCHbORUHETHAHt
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANC
CIS-l»3-OICHLOROPMOPENE
J-CHLOROETHYEvINYL ETHfcR
BRUMQF'UHM
1/1# 2» 2-IETRACHL0R0ETHANE
TETRACHLOHUETHfcNtlTtTKACHLUPOEIHYLb'NtJ
TOLUENfc
CHLOHOBENZiiNE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
5 » 1 r I, E A*/D tft MANAQKMei
rP* .ran.pgjj f v
*THrwa c^orcia
PURSCABbK ORG»-lCB ANALYSIS
watb»»
sample wo,i 0*n?2 BY I
SCALED I
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO,l 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl 0 INORG SAMPLE NO. I md
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC}I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)|
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY t TBB 8AMPTE DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•«»PEMARKS«»*
•••FOOTNOTES###
*A;AYEFAGE YALUE
•K-ACTUAL VALUE T8 KNOWN to be lfss than value GIVEN
H-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE dlVEN
#0-MAT|RIAt was ANALYZED FOR but NOT DETECTED, T«E NUMBER IS
The mintmum quantitation uwit.
tnuLTA
lftu
lOU
Iou
iou
L7J
5"
5<"
5H
5D
5'!
511
5tl
5"
II!
511
5"
51)
ill
iou
511
5"
1 nu
5U
5li
51'
5U
"C^l«
. Vtt/'E
K8 ft
Uy/L
t'G/u
UG/L
M
UG/L
lig/L
UG/L
i'G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ug/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
SL ..
CHbOf
-.•ICTHANE
"gSCSKfo «r-
PSjg*"®.
HCTHILCNE CHtaRIDI
likteglsilKM!
;hl,okidic
«K(1 , |>DlCHIiOROBt'H«l
-------
ATHRNfl CroDCTA
« YflTR*'
ot/it/«« pvpokahlc onoAMica analysis
WATf*
SA-PI.C MO, I *«rl?2M SAMPLF T»rci FIjOPIK
PROJECT NO,I 86>306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RC«A
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
Cliri MILTON STATE! *L
STATION 1,0,1 rtELD BLANK,U1t"9,MQA009
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 0J/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED 8Y» RECEIVED FROM!
SAMPLE REC'01 DATE/TTME 00/00/00 REC'D BY I
SEALED!
CHEMIST I CHH
ANALYTICAL M
METHOD!
CASE NO, I lilt ORG SA«PL£ NQ| p XNORG SAMPLE NO.I "0
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)!
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER 3URVFY
REMARKl
SAMPLE LOC, VERIFIED BY» TRB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
••»FOQTNQTES»»»
»A-*yERAgfr VALUE «NA-NnT ANALYZED »NAI»INTERFERENCES
•0-R6TIMATED VALUE •N.PRESOmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVrN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS known TO Bg GREATER THAN Value GIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUI NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION *
SOMPUOND
HLOHOMETHANk.
$5K?™esafD«: ----
CHLOHOETHAME
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
I* | «0ICh|J8bo£*Ha£k^ l"01CHtiOKUE*HHi#h.Nl;j
T»ri'"G i « Nr
CHLOKOrOP*
1,2-DICHLOHOtTHANt;
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CAHBUN TbTRACHLOHlUG
BRUMODiCNl/OROMiTMANK
1,2-DlCHLOHOpBUPANL
TRANS-I,3-DJCHLDH0PRUPENE
T R1C HLUfOET H£N t ( T K iCHIjURUEt H K U. t n t)
BENZENi
plbRUMUCHLORQMETHANC
111.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CI6-l,3-DICHLOHOPHOPfcNt
J-CHLOROtTHYtVINKl, tTHfcH
bromoform
1,1r2#2"1ETRACHL0R0ETHANE
TEiRACHLORuETHENtdllTHACMUjRUETHlfLtNfc)
TOLUENE
CHLORriBENZtNE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
punceanLE r"j*A£2£* a-avxbxb
SAMPLE NO.I 9f,c:?2*S f-VLT ?T"R! *1."".'
PROJECT NO.t 86-106 PROGRAM ELE«ENTI RCRA
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATIC I »%
STATION I,D,I BAILER EQUIP BLANK, Oil 05 ,*0 *005
STORET STlTioN NOl
SAMPLE CgLI-KCTIONI START DATE/TIME OJ/04/06
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME O0/00/O0
COLLECTED BY| RECITYED FPOMl
Sample rec'^i date/time oo/oo/oo rec'd p*i
SEALED t
CHEMISTl CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NQ.| 1U1 OPG SAMPLE NOl 0 INORG SAMPLE NO,I »P
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGHNIC1l
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
~A =
w4iW!«?l0v%E6
•K-ACTUAL
E •:N.®SM^^Z^JDEM?gAi;I?S?I^?|NCoPMATERIAL
18 KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE CIVEN
IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE
• IMMATERIAL WAS ANALYZED TOR 0UT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION M«IT. '
COMPOUMO
CHLOROMGTHANk
CHbOHOKTHANC
~ETHANE
,oHioe
OICHl.OHUElMrijfc.NK )
CH^0N0»6rm
1,2"D1CHL0RGETHANK
1, I.I-trichloruethane
CAr^ON TETRACHLORIDE
BRyMODlChLUROHKTMANB.
1 , 2-L)lCHL0HOPRUPAKt
TRAN6-I,3-DICHLORUPHOPENE
TPlCMLORUETHENfc; (IKlCHbUROtlHILbNt)
BENZENfc
DIBBgMuCMLDRUMfcTHArtfc
lt1.2-TRIC8L0R0ETHANk;
CX5-1.J-DICHLOKOPHOPENt
2-CHLOHOETHYLVINyL tTHKR
B«UMurORM
Irl.^-TErRACHLQRQtlHANfc
TefRACHLOROETHKNfctltiTRACMLURUKTHKLENBJ
TOLUENE
CHLOKOBENZKNE
KTHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
-------
' 07/17S«<> PURGEAB&E ORCA«ICB ANALYSIS
WATCH
sAMPt,e "o.i *
-------
-f«4sff#sa=/tg-?*—"
riiRCEAPoe onc»Mir« amavxbib
WATC*
»A»Pl/E MO, I •«rl?3"0 SAMPLf
type i
BL**"
PROJECT NO,I 06*306 PROGRAM ELEMENT» RCPA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON ST ATE t «-L
STATION l.D.I TRIP BL»NK
8T0RET STATION NOf
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATE/TIME 0J/07/«t
AMPLE COLLECTION! STOP OATC/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED HYj RECEIVED FRO"l
SAMPLE REC'PI DATE/TIME OO/OO/Oft PEC' D BY!
SEALEDi
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG 8AMPLF NOi P INDRG SAMPLE Nn,| MD
CONTRACT LAROPATORV(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABOPATORV(INORGANIC)I
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BVl TRB SAMPLE DATA VEPIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS*#*
•••FOnTNOTES***
•*NN-^mM^?^zi«iorN?gAi?I«^gcRiNEPMATERIAi)
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• Ij'ACJUAli VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVE"
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED for b'»t not detected, the number TS
the minimum ouantitation limit.
11 r< T TB cnMPOUND
Iic/C CHLnhDMETHAN
HSSfc Sfl&fMfiflftf
uq/l chloKoZthanc
taaMETHANK
o mr-
US/E MCTHVliSMjc'cSvOHZOC
t: 1 lElgKpS&aSSE4 1 • MSN* ,
I'c/T a«DlcnLnH':sTMri«r
HQ/it CMbOHOHJHM
"G'L If 2-piCHLOROE.THANt
VC/L }.1,1-TRlCHLQROETMANE
UG/L CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
UG/L BROMODICHLPROMKTHANIS
"G'L 1,2-nlCHLOKOPRpPANC
ug/l trans-T.I-dichloropropene
UG/L TRICHLUPOETHKNttlKICHLORUe
UG/L eROMOUlCHLOROMiTHANB
- * -" uOKOPRpPf
~ hCoi
_ _ ....... NttlKICHLORUElHKLfcNt)
UG/L BENZENE
"Q/l pIBROMuCMLURpMETMAfllS
UG/L T.I.a-TPIChLOROETMANE
UG/L ClS-l»J-UICHLOHOPHUHENt
UG/L 2-CHLOROETHYLVINXL eTHEK
UG/L BRUHOFURM
UG/L l,1,2/2-TETRACHLOKQETHANE
UG/L tETRACHLOROETHENEimRACHLURUHIMILENb)
UG/L TOLUfcNfc
UG/L CHLOHOBENZENt
UG/L ETHYL BENZENE
UG/L TOTAL AYLENE6
-------
AK«n JINAI.VSIA xiNAGEMKNT SVflTKM
rPH-Kafi.KEI? TV
ATNRMS G^OPGCA
07/17/86 PURGEABLC ORCANICB »N»LYBia, MISC
WATES
Sample NO, t »M"1'2*2 SmMHLu, / YHEl h'jhwij
PROJECT MO.| 86-JOe PROGRAM K1.K»r.HTl RCA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMId
CITY I MTLTON STiTEI Wi
STATION I.D.I t1 0,MQA010
8T0RET STATION NOI
8AMPLF COLLECTION I START nATFVTTM* 0J/05/R6
sample collectioni sTnp oate/tImf no/on/no
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FROM|
SAMPLF Rrc'ni D*TE,/TTMf: no/00/00 Rfc-np HYi
8EALEPI
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL MfcTHODI
CASE NO, | Ull ORG SAMPLE NOj D
CONTRACT LARORATORY(nRGANIC) t
Contract laroratory(1»iorgantc) i
REMARK | NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVY
REMARK |
INORG SAMPLE NO.I *D
SAMPLE LOG VERiriro BY I T«B
•••REMARKS###
DATA VFRIFIE" RY» CHH
•••«•»•••••«*•••«••••«•«•*••«••••#•••«««•••#••#«•••*••««•»••*••#
•••FOOTNOTES##*
"•J-EtT|MATlDV^AL§F •M-^RE^MPTt^fZ??lDENCEAof1p5ESENCEN0FSMATERlAL
•k-actual value is known to pe lfss than value given
•L-ACTUAL value IS known to re GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
_ •U-MATERTAL WAS ANALYZED FnR but NOT DETECTED, THE NUMHER IS
THV MINIMI!" DETECTION LIMIT.
• LYTIC AL Hr.BULT8»«*«*
CO^PObNU r« AMR
lOOOOU.
tNI UG/b C _
t f 4-UlOXANC
2O0DVU £WBS8fc
20000U I80BUTYL ALCOHOL
toonu MtTH*{RiUUNlTHlCE
oonov 2-PROPYK-X-OL
inonn" METHYL MirTHACRTfljATr
^tiii0
-------
A»ro A"'*i,yaT* M*N»atMKwr a vstit"
rp*«.rar, "(to iv
ft TMpNfi ftfpWGIA
07/17/ae PIIHREABLE ORGANIC* »NALY«IS, MI8C
WATEP
s.«AVPLF TYPFl *,tvO,
project no.i 86-30b progkam et^tnti pcra
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANJMID
CITYl MILTON STATirt «a
5TATI0N I,0,« lr*2fMOA002
5T0RET STATION noi
SAMPLE COMjKCTIONJ START n*TbVTIM* 01/03/06
SAMPLE COLLKCTIriN I STOP n»TK/TTMT 00/00/00
SOLLECTED BY t RF^E TVEP FROM |
AMPLE PEC'Ot OATF, /TIME 00/00/00 PfcC'D BY»
SEALEPl
CHEMIST)
ANAliXTXCAli MeTHOot
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I Ml)
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGAnTC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY (TNilRGMJTCI !
REMARKt NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKj
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED HYI T«H DATA VERIFIED HYI CHU
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED _ *NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N.PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KMOHN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO flE GREATER THAN VaMJE flIVEN
• U-MATEKJAL "IAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THF minimum DeTKrTtCJM M"IT.
*«»•• tcal
_ 7000(1
10000U-
2OO0UD
20000U
soonu
20000U
10000')
^Ol/Oull
sou
aou
20U
5"
bU
aou
5U
SOU
sou
10U
5U
10U
inu
10U
10U
511
XM* UG/L
cumpounU mam*:
> » 4-OIOXJtNE
iaoBuTrf alcohol
MCTHACRYtUNXTRlLC
2e?h?lySethSI5h*late
ACETON ITRILL
crotonaloehyde
» »2-nxB|(OMO"3»CHtiURQPROPANIS
l#l,l,2-TETRACHL0R02THANt
1,2-DlBkOMOETHANE
1 ,2,J-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,4-DICHLOPO-2-bOtENE
TRTCHLOROf'LUOROMETHANE
ACROLEIN
ACRILONITKILE
acetone
carbon disulfide
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE
METHYL 16UBUT
-------
SdMPTj IT UNO ANAT.Y5IA MAnACC**eMT SYSTEM
KHA-rsn.RfG IV
ATHeNg CI^CRG IA
07/17/86 PllkGEABLE ORGANTC8 ANALYSIS, MISC
W*TE»
."•¦•-(-if, hftn 7JA2 SA-H.t lYt^rl h'.i.ou
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PRUGHAM FOMENT! RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN cyana*id
CITY! MILTON ST*TP1 n,
STATION I.O.J MW-J1,QJ103,MOA003
STORET STATION *0!
SAMPLF COLLECTION I START DATE/TIM*! 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP 0AT fi/TIT no/00/00
COLLECTFD BY I RECETVfD FROM I
SAMPLE REC'Hj DATE,/TIME OO/OP/no REC'D HYj
STALED:
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO ¦! 1111 ORG SAMPLE *101 D INORG SAMPLE NO.! MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(URGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(I"ORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GkOI'NDWATEF SURVTY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED pYl TPB PATA VERIFIER P* I CHH
•••remarks*#*
•«•»»•»•#»»###»»»«»••#»#»»»*»•»#«»«»««#»*•#«#»##»«#»»»»#»»»»*»»•
•••FOOTNQTES»»»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NUT AH»LYZEP •NAI-INTF.BfERENCES
•j-ffsTiKAfEn ?At,or •N-PHrlOMpTrv^ rviorNeE of presence or material
•K-ACTUAL VALUr IS KNOWN to be LESS THAN VAU'E GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•u-material was analyzfp tor b"T not detected, the number is
THE MINIMUM DETECTION 1,1*1?.
HffiliLTK
2 0UOOII
J88888
aoooou
boonu
loooou
20000"
•«20l!
6 70V
170"
4 2U
42U
170U
4211
4 2 OU
• 7011
7 01J
42U
83U
»3U
8311
8 Jll
4?U
IN I UC/L Cit^l'llUNU MAKE
t/4-OIOXAKE
JUHOL
tThlCc
ate mm
I80BUTYL, ALCC
MfcTHACRiLuNII
METHYL METHACHYtATB
ACEONITPILE
CHOTOe. Ai>|)c.n »i/t
I,2-DIBftOHO-J-CHbOROPROPAHt
t , J , 1. 2-TETHACHUOKOKTHAHB.
1,2-niBRnMO
1,?,3-THICHLOHOPROPANE
1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTBWE
TRICHLOROt LUOHOMETHANt
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONlTHIliE
ACETONE
CARBON KISULEIDt
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINKIj ACETATE
METHYL ISUBUTYL KKTUNfc
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
STYRENE
-------
»ccMK»»r <»r a re-
f-p* . nrc IV
ATMEnfl Groncii*
07/17/86 PURGKABLC OPGANTCS A NALYA X8 » «1»C
WATCP
SmNPIjE, Nfl, I Hhll/Z-e ^ | »«1*
PROJECT NO.j 8b-30e> PROGRAM ELE"ENU "CPA
80UPCEI AMERICAN CYANAMTD
CITY! MTLTOK STATE! ri
STATION 1,0,1 H 2 2 ,ult 07, MOA007
SfORET STATION HOI
SAMPLF COLLFCTIONI START OATS/TIMS O3/O4/86
SAMPLE COILFCTinNi STOP DATt/TI"r "0/00/00
COLLECTED BY: RE<"ETVFD FOOMl
sakple PEC '01 u»tf,/timit ao/on/no rfjr'p pyi
SFALEOl
CHEMIST!
ANALYTIC
AL METHODS
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLF NOt P INORG SAMPLE NO. I MU
CONTRACT LA»ORATORY(f)"GANIC) I
CONTRACT l.ARORATORYCINOPGANlCI j
REMARK| NATIONAL GROU'pwATfcR SUPVFY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TPB PATA VERlFIEn BY I CHH
•••REMARKS###
•••FOnTNOTES«*»
•A-AVEP.AGE VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI"INl'ERFERENCE5
•vJ-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRFSI'kPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VAL1IF TS KNOWN TO be LF8S THAN VALUE GIVF.N
•L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERJAti WAS ANALYZED Fpp B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THF MINIMUM nETFCTION LI«IT.
• •¦•ANALYTICAL RCaui,T»»«
^QMpQUNU NAME
TftXLC
SF8ULTB INI UO/L
nvoou 1.4-DlOXANi
i88S8K -ftatt<«Kitt8fc
2000OU xenbUTYL al
500UU MCTHACP"*
2O0OUU 2-PKOpY
1000011 METHYL
2oonou ACETONt.
V4V" CRnTONALDtHYDE
33011 1,2-[>IHKOnO-3-ChIJOROPHOPANfc
330H 1,1,1.2-TETftACHLOftOgTHANe
«4U 112"DlBROftOETHANE
84U 1,2»J-TRICHLOKDPHOPANE
330" 1 , 4-DICMLURO-2-BUIFNe:
MO'i ACROLEIN
840U ACRYLONITHILE
17UII ACETDNF
35J CARBON DISULFIDE
17011 METHYL ETHYL KETONE
17011 VINYL ACETATE
170" METHYL ISUBUTYL KETONE
170U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
b 4Lt STYKEnF
-------
07/J7/S6 PURGE* BLIE OWCANTANALTSIfl, M1SC
WATER
PtJt, - r ; K-l'Cli Rt»^L*'
PRO.JECT Nn I flb-JQt, PPUGRAM Ct»CMEwTt RCPA
SOURCE| AfEPICAN CYANAHID
CITYi «ti,t>)w srnrr.t fl
STATION 1,0,1 pw-4,r>J 1 11,MOA0H
STORET STATiDN NO:
SAMPLF COLLECTION! STAPT DATE/tIMF P3/05/B6
ArtPir collfctihnj stop oate/timf nc/oo/no
COLLECTED HYJ PfETVTD FROMl
SAMPLE "E<"ir« PATK,/TTMK OO/on/OO REC'D BY I
SEALEHi
CHEMjSTl
ANALYTICAL "ETHHo!
CASE NO.I 1111 OHO SAMPLE NOi D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY (ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LAftOPATliPYt IMORGANlClJ
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVFY
RFMAPKl
SAMPLE LOG Vf.PIFJFK BY | TRH HATA VERIFIED PYI CHH
#»«REMAPKS«#»
•••FOOTNOTKS#«»
•A-AVEPAGC VAUIP; •NA-NUT ANALYZED #naI-INTERFERENCES
•vl-FSfIMATED VALUE «N-PRE8tJMPTTVr EVtDEnCE OF PRESENCE OF VATERjAL
•K-ACTDfti, value is known to be lr.as Than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUF TP KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
... •y-MATFHlAL was ANALYZFP FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
tmf minimum ngtECTioN mmit.
•««»kNftLYTlC*L HrSULTB*«»«*
M« UC/L COM|>OUNU NAME
1t4-nlOXAnC
«4Wfc-iWB»Bfc
X6O0UTYL ALCOHOL
MCTHACRYLpNlTXlLC
2E?5?C*BKTHA^hYI,ATe
ACRTHNITPiLfc
CMOTONALDEHYDE
1 « 2-[>XPROMO-3-C«LOBOPHOk'ANt
1,1,1,J-TETHACHLOHOETHANt
1,2-DIBHOMOETHANE
1,2,J-TRICHLOROPKOPANE
1 , 4-PlCHLORO"2«Bllf ENE
TRICHLOROFLUOKOHFl'HANE
ACRULtlN
achylonxthjle
acetone
CARBON OlSUUflOt
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
VINYL ACETATE
METHYL 16WBUTYI, KETDNE
HfcTHYL BUTYL KETONE
5TYRENE
-------
/ sjmpi.r »"irj u»N*Gtn»TJT avflTt"
/ rP»-eJn,»eATE/TTMlp 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED EPOMi
Sample becdi oate,/timr. no/on/on recd ryi
SEALED t
Aum r am «
analytical H£TH0r>«
CASE NO.J till ORG SAMPLE no, p INORC SAMPLE Nn.| MD
CONTRACT LABORATORYt ORGANIC ) I
CONTRACT T,APORAT[IRYf INORGANIC) I
REHARKt NATIONAL GROUNP*ATEH SURV*1!
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB DATA VERIFIED PYl CHH
••»REMARKS*«»
#««FonTNOTfc:s»»»
L_ »A-AVERAC.E VALUE «NA«NQT UNALYZEP »NA I-INTERFERENCES
\~~~ *J-ESTIMATEO VALUE ~N.PRESUmPTTVE EVIDENCE OE PRESENCE OE MATERIAL
I »K"ACTUAL VALUE IS known to be less than value given
#l-actual value is known to re Gpeater than value given
i •U-MATF.RIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B'lT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT.
• »*>»JtNMkTTICAb
StsliLTft
pyoun
Jo o n u <)
OUOOU"
200OUU
5000U
oooou
joooou
5I)U "
20U
20U
3D
S»U
20U
bll
bOU
SOU
jnu
5"
100
I0U
I0U
t<)U
51'
"UMPOU N u M AMF.
aim sw«28fc
isobutyl alcohol
_ ^ACn*l,ni(lTHIL«
2-PROPYN-I-OI,
METMYbMETHACRYI
-------
O7S17/06
xAr.vn i « mamaock
>-PM*KSn,l>RG F V
>TH|TN« CrOPG I A
PtfRCCABLE OBGANJC8 *NAL¥«t5, *18 C
r Xc *L<
CUNPOUMU NAHK
MATEO
SAMpt.fr »»n#f «Ari?2<>«5
" v r» r» • » 1
PROJECT NO,| fl6«3(Jb PPHGRHM Et,E"ENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITYl MILTON ST*TKI O'L
station i,u,i i,ns-a,«um,MO»«t8
STORET STATION •Jill
SAHPLE COLLECTION! S T • R T n*TE/TTMr OJ/06/86
SAMPLE CUlurCTinht STOP »ATE/TIM* ftO/00/00
COLLECTED HY I RErEIVED ER0Mt
ba*pi,e »KC'r>i d*tf,, /time oo/on/oo Rnr
-------
O 7/17/06 PTJHrtSABME ORGftNICS ANALYSIS# MISC
«*TBP
SAMpt.K NO. j .«»»OTir tVOTi
PROJECT NO.I R6-306 PPORRAM ET.e«ENTI RC"A
HCEl AMERICAN CYANAMJD
IT* | mTLTOm state• *J,
STATION 1,0,1 S 1-1.0 1 Its,
S TQRET SIATIijm no I
SAMPLF COLLECTION I START DATE/TTMr 03/OA/Sb
Sample collection stop nATE/TlMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY J RFrCTVFD FRO* I
5AMPLF REC'Hi UATF,/TTmf no/on/no Recn HXI
SEALED 1
chemistj
ANAL If T IC AL METHnnt
CASE NO,! 1111 DRG SAMPLE N0| D INORG SAMPLE NO.t Ml)
CONTRACT LARORAT»»y(URGAhTC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(I^ORIANIC 11
REMARK| NATIONAL GHnU^O^ATKR SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLK LOG VERIFIED HY t TRH HAT* VERIFIED BY I Cri M
»#«PEMARKS#»#
•••FOOTNOTES###
•A-AVERAGE VALUE #«*-NyT ANALYZED •NAI-INTBRFERENCES
•J-ESTIWATED VALUE #N.pREg!U|PTT VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO Be LrsS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual valuf. ts kmown to be greater than value given
~U-mATFRIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THF MIVrCUM DGTECTTON LIMIT.
NALYT ICAL. ¦ •
INI ^OHPOUND
1
znoootl 1,4-niOXANt
mm
zooootl lanBUTTU ALCOHOL
looou MCTHAwR*bOI1THIbC
ItBiL
oSoSu 3e?R?C52tAa8J
-------
OT/17/HS PUMOKABLE ORGANIC* AHAfcYSIS, MIflC
w*re»
HAMpr r «in#i onrimi mr; mONwI.
PROJECT NO , | 86-306 PROGRAM K'.EMfNT I RCRA
SOURCE I AMSrICAN CYANA^ID
CITYl MI IjTON STATE! Ft
STATION I.u.l MW-5,01IO«,MQAU04
STORET STAliuN NQ|
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONi rt^HT IUTE/TTMF 03/04/Rb
SAMPLF COLLECTIONI STOP 1ATK /TIMF 00/00/0(1
COLLECTED BY I PgCETVFD FBOMj
SAMPLE RECT>( 1>ATF,/TI*F 00/00/00 HEC'D HY J
SCALED t
CHEMISTJ
ANALYTICAL MpTHOPt
CASE NO. I llll ORG SAMPLE N0| D INORG SAMPLE NO. I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY (OP(JM IC ) I
CONTRACT LAKURATtlPY(INORGMIC) |
HEMABKi NATIONAL GROUNDWATER StJRVFY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LUG VKHIFJF.U HYI TP8 riATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•~•REMARKS*##
•••••«••••••»••*••••••#•««#•••«»•*••••«»••••«•«•••«••«•«••••«•««
•••FOOTNOTES###
»MA-NgT analyzeo •nai-intehferc*ces
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PBFSfl«PTTVlf EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UF MATfcRjAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS known Tn BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVFN
•l-actual value is K"iown to be qpeatfr than value given
•U-MATERIAL JUS ANALYZED FOR B«T NOT DF.TF.CTEO, THE NUMflER TS
THF MINIMIS OHlTRrTTON LIMIT
KA1.YT TC
'iOUOUH
I
OUOUII ALt.lt I, UliCUHUl,
-r "¦ XnIUE
?YU ALCOHOL. ,
RlliUNlTXlLE ; |*
OUIO" ETHJL C*j
"OOOU
I ¦
OUO0U I SdBUTYIj ALCOHOL
SOOOU WKTHAfiBKIiUNiTK"
20000(1 J-PKOPYN-l-Ol,
JOOOU" METHtLMEThAC»Hl/ATf
200001/ ACFTDNTTRlLt
bOU CROTONALDkHJ Dfc ,«
20U 1 , 7-niBHdMO-J-CHIjUHUPHOPArtt : .i
201) 1 , 1 f 1 / 2-TETHACHLOkOtTHANt
5H 1,2-DlRHOMOETHANE t
5" 1,2,3-THICHL0H0PR0PANK '
JOU J . 4-IlJCHLUR0»2»BUTENE
5" ThTCHLnHnKl.UOKOMETHANE
SOU ACROLEIN
SOU ACRYLOWITH ILK '
10U ACETONE
5" CARBON DISULFIDE
1"U METHYL ETHYL KETUNE
10U VINYL ACETATE <
Ion MfcTHYL ISUHUTYL KfcTUNfc
lOU MfcTHYL BIJTYL KEICiEe
6" STYRFHF
I
(
-------
«-'n « IvAf. ynifl Mr»TK"1
*,p»-r«nc"sg *v
ATUfNj) C'nRGIA
07/I7/B6 PURGRABLE ORSAMTCS ANALYSIS, W X SC
WATER
¦<»«>"/' wn.f SAMPLE TYP*! Mr'H'il
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM El.EMFNTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMCRJCAN CYANAmIQ
CITYl MILTON STATE! 'I,
STATION 1,0,1 «M»1J.Ot|2t,M0A0J1
STORET STATjuN Not
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONj START DATE/TIMF Oj/OJ/Bft
SAMPLE COLLECTION STOP P»TE/tTMF 00/00/00
CObtECTKD MY I DECEIVED KRD*I
sample recpi datp,/timp no/uo/uo PF.CD «rr
SEaLEO t
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHnUI
CASE No, I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NQt P INOHG SAMPLE NO, I »D
CONTRACT l ARURATOfiY('lPGAUIC) I
CONTRACT LAMdMATOPY(INORGANIC)t
REMARK I iiATIOIAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
PEMARKj
SAMPLE LOP VE" tFjFD PY| THB HAT A VEPIFTEO PYj CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOnTNOTKS***
•A-AVERAGEVALUE -N()T ANALYZED »NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTImATED VALUE •N-PHESI)MPTTVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAI, VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-AflUAL VALUE 15 KNrjWN TO Wg GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATFRIAL V(AS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
Tup MINiwum r)FTECTTON MMtt,
^ounou
• AN KbYT tClkL. Hr.SIILTS«*
UMfnuNU name
TOO 1.4-DlOXANt
S06O0U ISnBUTTb AUCOHOb
sooou hcthacrvlonIthil*
JO0O01) 3E?R?LyRi?H8i!RYLATE
rn0"0!) ACKTON Tl'P 1 - ~
iOU CKHTONALDtH»Dfc
*011 1 , J-DJuBOMO-3-CHLOROPROl'Af.fc
*0U 1,1.1,5-TtTRACHLOROlTHANK
b" If2-DlBROHpETHANE
5y.. 1»?» J-thichlokopropane
t&ich£oF
20U 1,4-DICHLURO»a-BOTENE
5U TkiCHlOBOFLuOROMETHANE
5"U ACROLEIN
sou acrylonitmle
1?¥.j caShonEdisulfxdi:
lflu METHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U VINYL ACETATE
10U METHU ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL RElONF
bU STYHENE
-------
07/17/86 PURBRABLE OPG»MTC« "ISC
W»TJ»
xi'mp -i4t •»er!,,a'*7 sample ivpri
PROJECT NO*I 86-306 PRUKRAM EtEMENTi RCPA
SOURCE I auCpican cyanamid
CITY I MILTON ST»Tei w\,
STATION 1,0, t Mrf-18,0110«»MOAOO»
STORET STATION noi
SAMPLE COLLECTIOM START r>ATE/TlME OJ/05/H6
SAMPLE COLLECTIONJ STOP DATE/TTMr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FBOhi
SAMPLE REC'ni OATF^/XT^ 00/00/00 REC'O BYl
SCALED|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL VETNODl
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI D INORG 5AMPLE NO.I *V
CONTRfCT LARnRATfiRYCCiRGMJC) I
CONTRACT LAWURATORY(IMORGANIC)I
REM ARK 1 NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVX
REMARKt
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TAB DATA VERIFIED PYl CHH
•••neMAPxs«*«
•~•FOOTNOTES***
• A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA«NnT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEt) VALUE •N«PRESUMPTfvE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to re less than value given, ,
•L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•y.MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B»I NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
the minimum neTErrTo*' l1"it.
EStlliTS INI UU/li CUH|>t)UNO N*Mt
nooull 1,4-OlOAAME
88*88 ftfefcJfc «s»«8fc" ,
OOOOU ISOBOTYL ALCOHOL
00«U MtTHACPXLCjNITHlLC
8838" 2^t}?ESE?ft;^*LATE
OOOOH ACETQNITr.lt,::
»0U CKnTOM ALOtHK Dfc
20V I,2-DXBKOMO-J-CHLORgPHOPANE
20U i,1,1.5-TETRACHLOROETHANE
U 1.2-DtnROHOETHANE
II l,2#3-TRlCHLOHOPRUPANfc
OU l,4«DICHL0Ra-2-BUfE«E
ll TfuCHLOhOFLUOhOMKIHANIi
SOU ACROLEIN
SOU ACRYLUN1THILE
iCU ACETONE
51) CARBON disulfide
10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
100 VINKL ACETATE
J0U METHYL 1S0BUTKL KETONE
1 nu METHYL HU'lYL KETONE
ill STYHfc'NE
-------
o7/17/ne puRcusie a»sic< »i«Liar>, hi*c
WSTBB
* KPt.r *n,f n«n?)1| 5AWPTK TVPB-f unn^l.
PROJECT NP.J 86-306 PPOGPAM CT,E«(rNTI PCPA
sourcei amCricam cyanamto
CITY I MILTON STATEI Ft
STATION I.U.I «W-?4,*JJ UJ,MOA0J3
6TOPET ST*T.fp« «0I
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START OATE/TXMF 03/05/16
SAMPLE CClMifCTJONI (STOP PATE/TTMF "0/00/00
COLLECTED HY| PECETVFD FRUV I
SAMPLF BKC'Ill 1)ATF»/T1MF 00/00/00 RfcC'B «*«
6EALE.Pl
CHEMIST:
ANALYTICAL "ETHOPi
lNnnr sample Nn,i mu
CASE NO.I III! ORG SAMPLF NU| V
CONTRACT LABORATORY (ORGANIC ) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INOPfiANIOI
REMARKI NATIONAL GhOUNPWaTKV 811PVF*
REMARK|
SAMPLF LOG VERIFIED hY| TRH DATA VERIFIED B Y t rHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AYERAGE VALUE *na-nOT ANALYZED #NAI-JNJEh»,ERENCES
•J^EsTlMATED VALUE •N-PPE6"MPTTvP EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAl, VALUE IS KNOWN TO PR LFSR THAN VALUE GIVFN
•L*ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN rn RE GREATER than VALUE GIVEN
»U-m*TERIM. was analyzed FOR B"T not DFTECTEK. the number is
THF MINIMIJW [1FTECTT0N LIMJT.
«f i u«n«ii ACETO"1 TTP 1! i!
40U CHOTOHALDtHlfOfc
200 1,2»DinROMO-3-CHLOHUPHOfAWfc.
2»U 1,1.1,2-TETRACHLQROETHANK
51' 1 r 2-DIBK0Mt)ETHANE
511 I > 2, J-TRlCHLOHOpHOPANfc
20U \ , *»DlCHLUK0-2-bUTfcNF,
511 TfllCHLnHOFLUnROMETHANE
50U ACPULfc T N
500 ACRYLUN1THILE
l"U ACETOnE
5" CARBON DISULFIDE
1"U Mt'TMYL ETHYL KETONE
10U VINYL ACETATE
OU METHYL ISURUTYL KfcTUNE
00 UtTHYL bUIYL KEi(lj»E
» STYKENF
»
I
-------
07/17/86 pi;rrrao(.c obgawtc* n*»L.raia, »i«c
w »re»
8A"PfjK '*Tf"» /i I ME no/on/oo rfc'O hyi
SEALED I
CHEM1ST I
ANALYTICAL METHOD|
CASE no,I nil ORG SArtPLF "Ol n TNOpG SAMPLE NO.I »U
CONTRACT I-ABDPATOPYfORCAHTC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY f INORGANIC) I
REMARK | NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SiJPVY
REMARK t
SAMPLE LOG VtRIE JED BVl TRH DATA VERIFIED PYt CHH
• •«RF.MARKS#*»
• ••FOOTNUTE.S#»»
•A"AVERAGE VALUE
•J-FSTIMATED VALUE
• K-ACTUAli VALUE IS
•L-ACTUAL VALUF T 5
»'4A-MqT ANALYZED
•N-PRESUmPTTVf EV1
• NAWNTEBFEKENCES
EVTDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
KNOWN TO HE LF5S THAN VALUE GIVEN
„ . KNOWN TO Rg gPEATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
U-MATF.RIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR flHJ NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER T5
THE MINIMUM DETECTION II^IT.
• ••••AMAliVtrCAL
results i p« i uc/i, Compound
n StYRENE
-------
- -5Sr.$.S***Sfi8ZllX
07/17/86 PURBIEHIILK CjacftNTca (NtLTStt, "lit
W* TEH
H»»l,r »n,i aurnjtj SAMPf- TYP*"!
PRO.fErT NO.| H6-306 PROGRAM ELB"FNTt RCRA
SOURCEl AHERJCAi CYAN*MID
CITY I Mil,TOW STATKI "L
STATION I.B.I MUMP ITOII1P BL.K !,DS-1 , n \ J l 4 , MCI A 0 2 2
STOPLT STATION VUI
tAMPLF. CULbECTin*! START nAT4TE,/time no/on/oo Ptr'n PYl
SEALEH|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTIC*!, M^THOn t
CASE NQ.i till U«G 8A*PLF N 01 D INORG SAMPLt NH.l «[)
CONTRACT LAPORATllRYUIRGAMTC) •
CONTRACT 1AHUWATIJHY(] MORUANIC) I
REMAH* t N aTinNAll GROUNDWATER SUPVFY
REMARKI
SAMPLE I,OG VKRIFIKD PYl T<*W DATA VEKIFTED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
»»#FOnTMUTK5#»«
• A-AVEBAGE VAL"E »MA-NUT AN ALYZF.D «NA I-INTERFPRENCEii
•J-ESTIMATED VALU? «N-PRF3i)mPTTV1? EVIDENCE or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTDAl, Value TS KNOWN to re LTSS than value given
•L-aCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE RIVEN
•U-MATFRIAL WAS ANALYZFO FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NMMRt'R IS
THF MINIMUM DETECTION MMIT
5f>SooU° * I I N U N*MK
issssii riuit
Soooou ISOBUTyG tliCUHOL
SOOOU METH*CftKl.UN JtRICe
2OOO0II 2-PROPYW-I-Ql
louoou mktNU acetone
511 CARBON DISULFIDE
10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
JOU VJNYL ACETATE
10U MtTHYL ISUBUTYL KtTU*t
1011 METHYL HIJ1YL KETONE
5" STYKENE
-------
o»/i7/«e t>i;Rne*BLE ohodnics »N*i hisc
hateo
SifPi,c wn.t tvo". nn*i,«
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PPnr.RM ET.EMENTl RCA
SOURCE| AMER ICAN CY*NA»«TI>
CITY I HtLTUN ST»te» rt
STATION FIELD BLANK , U1 1 0
STOPET 3TAT!un MOI
SAMPLE COLLFCTinNI START r> ATE/TT»
-------
* ¦rn*r ~» >J»rinc; r A
07/17/«« PIlP^RJI HtR UnCANrCi* AMALY4IA» MJAC
.SAMPf.r »•'*, • pas* t*>9a a WiMPt p TVpVf pr.hdt.v
S5f? 5ST ??*' "6-306 pPOrMAM E'.K''BNT» BCPA
flOUHCCl AMERICAN CYANArltJ
crrn miltuv jtitci »¦/,
5JAIiC* Ii2«' F'Et.r «Ia*k,oi i oft, MOano*
STOPET STATION *101
SAMPLE COLLTTTnN i START nATE/TT«F OJ/04/86
8AMPLF COT.b^CTfr'Nl 5T0F ri ATE/f T M*" OQ/OO/OO
collected hyi P f.cf, t ved rpuMi
SAMPLE PKC'nj I) A T K > / T T M F 0(1/00/00 pgr•P nyj
S E A L K n f
CHEMISTJ
analytical methhoi
SUSEn^*'. -nHG sample nji r> inorc sample nh.i mu
CONTRACT l.AftnPATORY f nP(,ANTCl J
CONTRACT HI>nXATaPY( {>:i>»«ANTC 1 f
REMARK | NATIONAL fiHO,'^UuATEP SURVFY
REMARK 1
SAMPLE Lor, VKHIFItn fiY| PATft VFHtFIEP PYt CHH
•••RCMAPKR»»»
••~FOOTNOTES###
-3J§|i|SJ?i?^kg5r •5Hs3S8SHM?lr^rD«?g*i?IS3SE8Eggrg?8«ATERXAi.
: A a :] nkss: ?s ss 8g2T!sA?H:ws..srave„
• U-MATERIA^WAS^NALYZFO^nR^B^^HOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER TS
lOttOUC
aououu
JOonoif
I8S8S,, SEMSttSigSJl"*1* {1<
asw ;^?SfcJ?feCRVi'AT,: : l
b"u CBQTONALDfcMlfUt; ,t
3K,U } »J-l>I3HOMO-J-CHIiORUPHOfANfc !
^"U 1»1/JtJ-TCTHACHLUhOETHANK '
5" Vt2-dIbHOMOETHAHE
5*' 1.7,J-TRICHLOHOPROPANE f
iOU 1 . 4>DICHLOnU«2"U(ITENt:
SU TRICHLOHnfLUnHOMETHANt
SOU ACROLEIN
!>0U ACYLONITHILE <
-------
07/17/8ft PUFfUCAHLK ORGANIC" 1NILYSIS, »I8C
w»ren
s»"pi.k un.t *a"pt,s typ*i kw«
PRO.TECT NO, | 86-306 ppuCRAM ET.EMlTNTl RCRA
SQURCEl AMERICAN CXANAMtl)
CITY! MII.TOn STatei rj,
STATION I.D.I BAILER *UMIP MLANK,011 OS,MUAOn$
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTinNi START PATE/TTMF OJ/04/A6
SAMPLF COLLECTION! STOP PATE/TIMF nn/nn/oo
COLLECTED aY| RECETVFP FROM|
SAMPLE REC'Ol DATE,/TIKE 0O/0O/00 PECM) RYl
SEALEDl
CHEMIST!
ANALYTIC
AL METHOD I
CASE no.| 1111 ORG SAMPLF NU| P IrtORG SAMPLE NO.i ML-
CONTRACT LABORATORY(CIRGAnTC) I
CONTRACT LAPORATORY(INUHGANJC) |
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TPP PA^A VERIFIED BY t CHH
•••REMARKS*#*
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFEREWCES
•O-ESTIMATEO VALUF »N-PPESUmPTTVIT EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be less Than value given
•l-actual value ts k^own th pe greater than value given
•U-MATERIAL was analysed for B"T NOT detected, THE number is
TUP; minimum DETECTION limit.
• ••••ANALiYTtCAL HEBULT8*««»*
HFauLTa jni ug/l ccpouiu nanr
20000H 1<4-010XAMF
JS888U fifwfc mxm
ioomiti laoeuTTL alcohol
SOOOU MeTHACRXLOHlTRlCe
JOOOOM 2-PROPVH-I-OL
1000011 METHYL HETHACRYLATE
jrtnnnn .^CETONTT**!" —
bou CKQIONALOfcHJtOi;
" 1 ,2- "
20U ) ,2-DIBROMO"3-CHL0R0PKOPAN&
20U 1,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5U t,2-DlBR0M0HETHANt
5'l 1 , 2, J-TRICHLOROPROPANt
ZOU 1.4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE
511 THTCHLOHOtLUOflOMETHANE
bOU ACRULETN
50U ACRYLONITHILE
1 Oil ACETONE
51' CARBON DISULFIDE
1"U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1 0It VIN1L ACETATE
10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
ill RTYKENF
-------
"KG I V
pMKWfl (i^nRCt*
07/t7/e« P'tBRITABLE OPG*NIC* ANALYSIS, *I3C
W*TE"
s»mpi,c no. i r rvr»: sr.*-
PROJECT NO, | flb-306 PHOrcKAw FT.EMFNTl PCPA
SOURCri AMERICAN CYANAMTD
CITYl MILTOw ST»TM fl
STATION 1,0,1 TRIP «M*HK
STOHfcT STlTfu'J *,r)t
3AMPLF CULtiTTl ON I START PATE /TT»' OJ/07/86
SAMPLE COUUV:CTln,J« STHP nATir/TTMr f>0/00/00
COLLECTED avi RF^ETVED FRO"* I
Sample RKC'ni [jatf,/ttmf oo/oo/nr) Rfr'n pyi
SEALED)
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHODi
CASE NO,t 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOt P INORG SAMPLE NO,I «D
CONTRACT MPORATOPYMiPGAnTC) I
CONTKACT LAnORATfiPY(INORGAMC)l
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SIIPV^Y
REMAPKi
SAMPL*" LOT, VEPirim HYt TAP DATA VEPTFIfP RYI CH^
•••ren'apks*#*
•~•FOOTNOTES***
• A"AV£paoe vrlme »na-kut analyzed •nai-iniebferences
•J-ESTImATED VALUE •n-phfsUKPTTVF evidence of PRESENCE of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VAL'JE TS known Tf1 Pe Lr5S than value gtvfn
•L-aCTUAL VAl.'JE TS known TO BE GREATER THAN VaI.UE dlVEN
•u-materjal was analyzed fop put not detected, the number ts
THE fJUI^U" nETirrj ro*t t.IMIT,
• ••••ANALYTICAL KKBIILTtt««
HK6irL.TA IN« UG/L COMfl'WNU nAMF
20000M 1,4-UinXftNE
cWUI'VU A m *™U IflAKraC.
imsu ftta mmk
2OOOOU IaCUUTYL ALCOHOL
fnyou HtTHUCPtLONlTKILK
JOOOOll 2-PROPYN-l-QL
1000011 MtTHYLMETNACRYLATE
nriOTJ'I ACFTDNtTRXtit
5<>U CHOT'JNALDfcHYUfc
2QU 1,2-IURROHO-J-CHLORUPHOHANt
20U ),1,1,2-TCTRACHLOHOETHANt
511 1,2-DIBHOHDETHANfc
511 1,2, J-THICHLOHOPHOPANK
1.4-DICHLURU-2-BUTENE
Su Tr1CHLi1hOKLUOROMETHaN£
SOU ACRULtlN
5011 ACRYI.ONITHILE
20UJ ACETONE
5'i CAPBON DISULFIDE
10U MtTHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U VINYL ACETATE
10U METHYL lSUHUTil KfcTU»E
iou methyl Butyl ketone
5" styrene
-------
4
fc
<
X
1 uz
. X *
! S
H
tf Mj
«*<
SQ Idi K
~JtWMUfctt O
ZUXS3& OO
U«UH*
X
h
SSttiSHZ M U
OCOOHOIK3J C
jXfliaUttH;: oxaix _ _ _
3:oocoob)3uzouc<>*h:iaKr
U4JXJI>UHUJ2«Z£X ~
id
H
<
J
>«ZUUHHHZ
UajZC33il
UJJiil.il
t- >*zx
«u
ix<
at
ji i
XJH
hHZ
3t<
u xac
* 33
-* 33
QUJJJ
__ „
fizzaaj I ZHJ
0H30z» * *r"*XU
-J
X
0i
3
a
H
czv
(
-3
3!
JZ
3<1
ZS
oqz:jjhj
2 Z l>«DZO
UJalOIZNZ
XZXHU&U
C^QiOtflX I X-3
^cjiD.«ao
>*zz • o «oz
Z3U^KVXU
. _ . _ „ H JH IHI3Z
:iiiiozb..3(ijxoodhhjhhcw aooaxuHH sh^wim* i ^wxoa UiiaoHjja
zixxx;4oO^-3Haaatrxzzxzjoj3hu3z ^i<-z»-*uxcc< ouio iuhxzxid
>hhitia- nziozcxirMHOii>>.izxzww » dn^dzjn-* • owxux
33 M-- Z MNSIlUNZhZ I | «uhIlZ ^nuhiu: z^ui ¦ i x « « «i ^ t fa: i
2 X-'Zi»HxrN< ^ .2 x ~a. rva.ru :>*£m tf'Ntva. ^
i
t t
•J4JJJJJ.. J-U J J J -3-U -3-3 J -3-3 J-3J J J J-3 -JJJJJ-JJ J JJ JJJJOJJJJ JJJJ
«\\\\vv\v\\ VWWSW V "v W wwvwwww \\\.\s \ \.VW W WNSWv
1
Y
-
:3333333I DDDD3SDD3Z =5 =5 3 Si 3 3^0 030
I teccccccccccccccccccoccccccocccoccccccccccccccccccooccc
i rem nn rn c* m cn .>• r* r* n f* cm r>« rM.% r* m -h >* r* cn .-x r* .*>* rs c>i ^ o* r« r« r*4 r* ."H r* cn *+¦w
J
I
*><
Ni-
IS1
ft:
m
•c
tc
•tt
IS;
a
z
ZK
«U
CI-
0
k
J
z
<
* ^
0
<
a
*>
x
b
h.
a
>
t-
UJ
X
>•
a.
X
i
-t
*•
>4
c
«c
X
«
— ¦
2
X u
w
c
U
O L*j
ac
Ui
tt
ac
N\
ax
u«
C
z
u.
••
4T>C
H
H
OC
c
QL
Z
'W
w
u.
U J
m c
>
>
y k.
O C
~-
u
><
<
•»
b.U
c
fa.
h
u u
XX
tB.y
«K
H
c
K-
ac
c
X
c
X «
hf-
0
••
s
< (-
c
V V
•V
M #*.
03
X «
<
UU
0
0 -u
u
0
fr-t-
C
z
a
0
X
« <
>».
uz
Ui.
X
a
•
CC
c
1-
ff
aa
c
0
JZU
<
1-
M
f-
a •* a
z
t
aa
U3
xco
c
*•
<
<.G
X
-
o>
-v
«>*>•
a
c
cy
*•>
M M
u:
••
aa a
k.
IO
zz
H
0
ooc
• z
3 Z
OC
-c
XX
M
i»-
•
•uo
2H
JJ
X-
X
t-
V5
•
OZh
u
^2 *3
A
IC
Z<-2
MM
OO
cu
4
z
c
M
«0
UU
u:a
—u
•s3
a
H -I
z
H —
ouu
•• ••
U
UU
Cl-»
Uk'
Lfc?C
«0H
z <«
X
falu-
NU
UJU
•-»>-
aa.
ace
O
U)
T>tt.>-
~ ft
a.&
XX
^'aj
X 0
Whf-
XX
CI
a
QDH
<0
JT <
U4
U3Z Z
X,
•
HON
hH
«<<
c*u-
xz
<00
uu
«c
•
*
0 hi
Z Zffi
UU1 uz
au >d
WZZH2
b-hliLfC
X«Q>- u
H»OL
za «-i
NH U< •
* fa.=S> O
t-»ao (si
«a
• (J 3U
ZZHH
u< b:
czxa
HHU
£!>• fc^t-
utnJWH •
«h rh
ZH UlWffl»-
»rf
• X.*:*2ir+
«OBQZH
b:w»-<«Z
us <¦
DJU-W«r
«iO
<> JJ3
*> <4 I
*
«UU
u<« i-UU<
H<(C< *2 U.
c • u. • 1 ix
o-< •
fa. * *~
* *
~
-------
-4-
jv PERSONAL effectiveness characteristics
The ten persona! effectiveness rharacunsfcs describe how successful executives, managers and supervisor nerform
-,*1**. attitudes. and pstspecuves but incrsase the likelihood of effective performance. These effectiveness Ch»°ie'
visticscapture the management styles that distinguish high performing executives.
Exemplary.
. Minimally
Qidlif ted
(.Understands self; has awareness of needs of others; negotiates;
iBoivts conflicts; persuades; sells ideas
I Speaks, writes, listens effectively
J.Difflonstrates independence; calculates and takes risks;
k decisive; accepts responsibility * ~-
iCorarned with go*' achievement
(.Shows willingness to lead and manage
Ik open to new information; is fleiible; has tolerance for
IttSlmbiguiry/change; is innovative.
?.Habroad, long-ierm view; balances short- and long-term considerations.
lCofcets'assesses'analyses information, diagnoses and solves problems;
anticipates future events, demonstrates sound judgment
l.k"tuned into" Agency and its environment, aware of importance
tf non-technical factors
10.Hu specialized expertise (e g., engineering, physical science,
kw, accounting) Please specify:
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
5*321
5 4 3 2 1
COMMENTS;
tywwtnd Date
"•wind Title
•wftaed additional information, may we call you?. ..Office phone
-------
07/17/86
EXTRACTARIF ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
5 A MPf,€ wn(i 0 mp»p Tver.
PROJECT NO,I 8b-}06
"r'JPCEl AM£R —
CITY I MILTOM
. PROGRAM Et.E"ENT« RCRA
SOURCES AMERICAN CYANAMIO
ST ATgI Th
STATION I.U.I HW.20,01102,MQAOo?
STORET stItIon NO:
f AMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/03/Rfr
ample collectiont STOP DATE/TIME oo/oo/oo
COLLECTED BYl RECEIVED FROMj
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE/TI^E 00/00/00 REC'P "X!
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL m
fcTHODl
CASE NO,| llll ORG SAMPLE NO! D
CONTRACT LABnRATOpYfnRGANIC>I
CONTR»CT LABORATORY(IMORGA NICI J
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
INORG SAMPLE NO,I MP
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TBB
•••REMARKS***
DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
•••footnotes***
«A-AVEBAGE VAL'JE
•j-estimated value
• NA-MOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTP;prEBE«'CES
• N-PRES1IMPTTV* EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
LI
20U
20U
Sou
20U
20U
2ou
20 U
2ii'
2 0 Li
20U
20U
2iu
20U
2ou
20U
2ft(j
20U
20U
2"!.
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE ^IVE"
•u-maTerial was analyzed ton but not detectf v-- ~
The minumum quantitation limit.
rECTED, the number
„ u
20U
201)
20U
20 J
20(i
2ou
20U
20U
20U
20U
20u
20U
2ou
20U
20U
20U
40U
20U
20U
20U
20U
2"U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
2«U
20U
20U
2ou
MATERIAL loot'
looo
10ou
TS loon
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/b
"G/.
(JG/L
uq/L,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
" G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1, 3-DICHLUhObEttZtNk.
BIS(2"CHLUH0£THYLJ tlMfcH
HEAACHLOHOtTHANE
aX6(2-CHL0H0X80PHUeiL) ETHtR
n-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
NITROBENZENE
HEAACMLOHOt)U'i'AgIfcNE
1. 2,4-TRiChLUHUBEN!6ENE
NAPHlHALfiNE
bI5(2-CHLOHOtTHOAJJ METHANE
1S0PH0H0NE „ ,
HrXACHLOHOCYCLOPENlAUltNt IHCCPJ
2«CHL0R0NAPHTHALbME
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACtNAPHThtNE
LIMETHXL PHTMAlATE
2, 4-OInIIRUTOLUEI.E
2,0-DIMTRuTgLUENE
4-CHLOROPHENIL PHENXL ETHEH
MiUOHENE
UJtTHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITHOSODiPHENYLANlNE/UlPMEKlLAfllOt.
HEXACHLOROBENZENE IHCH)
4-BROWUPMENYL ETHER
PHENaNTHRENE
anihhacene
DI-n-BUTKLPHTHALATE
FLUOKANTHENE
PYRENf"
BEnZYL BUTKL PHTHALATE
BISC2-ETHYLHKXYLJ PMl'HALATE
BENZU(A)ANTHRACEnE
CHKYSEhE
3«3'-DiCHLORUBEN;UUINE
DI-N-0CTILPHJHALAX6
BENZO(B ANU/OW KlFLUUKANIHENE
BENZO( b ANo/OR KJFLU&RaNTHENE
tfElxZU-A-PYHENE
IVDENO (1,2,J"CDJ PKKKNE
l>It>ENZO( A rW) ANTHRACENE
BENZOtGHDPEHYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENUL
2-«ITH0PhEN0L
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4«DICHLOROPHfcNUL
2,4,6-IRlCHLUROPHtNUL
4-CHLOHO-J-«ETHYLPHI£l»OL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-MKTHYL-4,b-DINITHUPHENUL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-nITK0PHEN0L
-------
07/17/86
, //w w tmm* Hmnn»r trm*
/ m.w.m tr
ATHENS GEORGIA
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC analysis
WATER
SA««P?.E 1J0.I «6C1'2«2
SA»PIC TYpn f. V 'L
PROJECT NO.I R6-306 PROGRAM E!.E"CNT| PCA
aOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
ITYl MlLTON STATEi rL
STATION I.D.I MW«21,Q110J,hQ»oo3
STORET STATION *01
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI START nATE/TINF 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI STOP OATE/TIM* OO/OO/Ol)
SOLLECTEU HY: PECETVED FPU"J
AMPLE REC'Dt DATE/TIME 00/00/00 PfcC'D HKI
SEALED I
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 OPG SAMPLE »0| n
CONTRACT LABOPATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATOPYfINORGANIC) |
REMARK t NATIONAL GROUND*ATEP StjWVFY
REMARKt
INORG SAMPLE NO.I *0
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TAB
•••REMARKS***
data verified RYl CHH
immmniw mum*****
•••FOOTNOTES***
—•jiisTfSiTio'^LfiE •N2?RESHM^T?il?Z|?IDENCE*iF1PPESEScEN8FSMATERl
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO be GREATER than value given
•U-MATERJAL HAS ANALYZED FOR BVT HOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE MINIMUM UUAnTTTATTON LlMlT,
ESULTS
20U
2OU
2ou
20U
20U
20U
2nu
2 "
2"u
2"U
20U
2nu
20U
2nu
Sou
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
2PU
2"U
200
2 mi
20u
20U
20U
2 OU
20U
2ou
2 OU
20U
20U
40U
2nU
20U
20U
2"U
2ou
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
2"U
20U
2 OU
20U
AL 100U
100U
ioou
loou
'INJTS
UG/L
agjt
UG/L
iig/l
¥.1
HG/li
UQ/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
M(j/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ug/fc
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Compound
1,J-UICHLUHtlBEAZENt
114-DICHLORU»ENZfcN£
lJa-DlcHCOBOtjENZbNt " - - ~
BI6C2-CHLOHOETHYLJ GIHKH
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BI8(2»CHLOROJSOPHUPIL) ETHER
N-nITROSuDI-N-PRUPYLAmInE
g.
HEXACHLOHOBUfADIfcNfc
1.2.4-IRICHLUROBtNZENE
NAPHTHALENE
B16.12-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLORUCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCC?)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACtNAHHTHYLENE
ACfcNAPHTHEI»E
DIMETHYL PHTHALATt
2,4-DIMTROTOLUENE
2,6-DINlTROTULUENE
4-CHLOHOpHfcNYL PHENYL ETHER
iLUOKENE
DltTnYL PHTHALATt
N"NITROSUDiPHENYLAM1NE/DIPHEN YLAMInE
HEXACHLOROBENZbNE (HCBJ
4-HRUMOPHENYL PHENIL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI»N-BUT XLPHTH ALA'rt
FLUOKANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
BI5C2-ETHYLHEXIL) PHTHALATt
BENZOtA)ANTHRACENE
ruuvKrur
i,3'•DiCHLOROBENZIUlNE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZQCb ANLJ/UR KJrLUOHANTHfcNt
BENZOCB AND/OR "KJFLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INUENU PIREME
UIbENZO(A»H)ANTHAACbNE
BENZOtCHIJPERTLEUE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2'NITHOPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIlTCTHXLPHE1»OL ~
2#4-OICHLnROPHENUL
2»4.6-TRICHlURUPHENUL
4-CHLORO-3-HETHYLPHENUL
, 4-DnriTROPHETOL-
1
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITRUPHENQL
PENTACHLORUPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
FPt.FSn.ffiG IV /
ATHENS GEORGIA fcESUJ.TS
20U
ii°U
Sou
07/1 7/8<> FXTRACTABLF ORGANIC ANALYSIS 2"U
WATER 20U
ii o o
20u
tjAMDTX nn • o -rv^--. r>»
" 2f>U
2ou
2ou
20U
PROJECT NO.J S6-J06 PROGRAM ET.EMENTj PCPA 20U
60URCEI AMERICAN CYANA*ID 20U
CITY I mILTO" ST*TEI FL 21U
2"0
STATION 1,0.1 PW.4,01111fHJA011 20U
STOPeT STATION *0l 2nU
2nu
SAmPLF COLLECTION! START DATE/TImF 03/05/H6 2"U
SAMPL*". COLLECTION! STOP date/tt«*r 00/00/00 2"U
20U
COLLECTED BY J RECEIVED FPriH | 2n0
SAMPLE REC'DI OAtE/TImE on/no/OO PEC'P HYI 2"U
SEALED 1 20U
2H)
CHEMISTJ CHH 200
ANALYTICAL MFTHOni 20U
2ou
CASE NO.1 1111 ORG SAMPLF NOl 0 INORG SAMPLE HO.t «0 2"U
contract laworatciry(opgantc) i 2"u
contract LAwnRAToRYfimopgamici« 2ou
2ou
REMARK 1 NATIONAL GRDU*DWATEF SUPVPY 20u
RFMARKt 20U
«nU
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I T«B DATA VERIFIED PY| CHH 20U
2°l»
•••REMARKS#** 2PU
20U
200
lino
2PU
20U
20U
20U
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••«•••••••••«••••••••••••••«• 2 n U
2nu
»««footnotes»»» inu
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAJ.INTERFERENCES 2PU
•j-estimated valuf »N-PRCSUhPTTVE evidence of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL 1O01'
•K-ACTUAL value 16 KNOWN TO BE LrS5 THAN VAL"E CIVF* IOOU
• L-aCTUAL VaLUF IS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE filVfN IOOU
•U-KATERIAL WAS ANALYZFD FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS I"OU
T«E MINl'HlJM QUAMTTTATIOV LIMIT.
1'nHR
UG/I.
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
I'G/L
UG/L
'it,/'
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
IIG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ug/L
UG/L
ConPuuNn
1, 3-DICHL'lHObCKZtMfc
1,*-ylCHLUKObtNZtNh
1.2-oiCHLQROBEH«ENE -
BIM2-CHL0R0ETHYLJ CTHtK
HEXACHL0RC1ETHANE
HIi>(2-CHL0H0iSUPHUCrL) ElHtR
w-wITROSOUI-N-PROfYLAMIlE
•.T PUHt NZKNE
HEAACHLOHOdUl ADlft
1, 2. 4-TfllCHLURUHENiENE
NAPHTHALENE
BI5I2-CHLUKOtTHOXXJ METHANE
ISUPhOKONE
HEXACHLOHUCYCLUPtNlADIfcNE IHCCf)
2-CHLORONAPHIHALENE
ACtNAPHTHYLF-Nt
ACENAPHTMKNE
UImFTHKL PHTnALAl'fc
2,4-UINITROTOLUENE
2»B"UInITRUT0LUEmE
4-CHLOKOPHfcNiL PtlfcNXL ETHEK
Fl.UORENE
DIETHYL phxhalate
N-NlTRUSODIPHENYbAMINE/DIPhENYLAMlNE
MEXAC HLOKUBEitZENb (HCB)
4-BR(J*UPHENYL PHEn*l ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANl'HHACENF
DI-n-BUTYLPHTHALATE
fluokanthene
PYftENE
BEN Z X L BUTKL PHTHALATE
BISC2-ETnILHtXYL) PHTHALATE
BEN Z(J ( A)ANTHRACENE
chhysfwe
3.3-.DICMLUROBtNZlOlME
Ul-N-OCTYLPHIHALATE
BENZUCb ANU/OR KIELUQRANIHENE
BEmZuIB AN&/UR KJFLUORAHIHENt
BEnZU-A-PYRENE
ANUEftO (1,2.3-CD) PJHENE
DIBEnZOCA»W)ANTHRACENE
6ENZ0(GHI)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-NI1RUPHEN0L
PHtNUL
2» 4«LIMETHYLPHE"QL
2# 4«L)ICHLOKnpHtNOL
2,4.0»TRICHLURUPHENUL
4™CHLOHn"3»METhYliPHENOL
2»*-DINITR0PHEN0L
2"METHYL-4,6-OINlTROPHfcNOL
pentachlunuphenol
4-NITR0PHEW0L
-------
07/17/86
rr'*rjf/"£U jr
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
HATER
So»PI,h. ,jn,: «hC172xL) ether
NITROSoDI-n-PROPYLAmInE
COMPUUN0
1 , J-DICHLOHOBEnZEnE
-igsEafiSgfiSiftSft——
bI6(2-CHLOM0ETHYL) ETHER
hexachlokoethane
BIB ~ ~ "
N«N
HEAACHLOHOBUTADlENfc
1p2r4-TRICHLOHUBtNZCHE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS<2»CHLOHOETHO*l) METHANE
ISOPHOPONF
!IEM8fi!SliS!lSSKI'*,c,,fc (HCt:,',
ACENAPtlTnKLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTH*LA1E
2i4-DInItROTOLuEne
2,<»"DInI1RUTULUE«IS
4«CHL0H0Ph£nxl PHENYL ETHER
PLUORENE
DIETHYL PHIHALATt
N-NITHOSUDIPHENYLAMINE/D1PHENYLAMIME
HFXACHLOROBEnZENE (HCBJ
4-BRo^yphenyl phenju cVmek
PHENaNIHKENE
anthhacene
di-n-butylphihalate
FLUoranthene _ _
-pykene
benzyl butyl phthalate
UI6C2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PMTHALATfc
benz^c^janihracene
i.J'¦DICHLURUBENZiOlNE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
«85--{HOfflBMSBSM1-
BENZU-A-PYKENE
H?4iu8R*NtHirNE
XNUENO (1,2.J-CDJ PXHENE
DIBENZO(A»H)ANTHRACENE
SEBZOfCHIJPEKTLENE
2-CHLOHOPHENOL
2-nitruphenol
phenol
2V4-DIHETHYLPHEWOL
2,4-UICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOKOPMEnul
4-CHL0K0-3-HETHYLPHEN0L
2 , 4 "TJXNTTROFHEWTII
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITRUPHEN0L
PENTACHLORUPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
m.WtitrG n
>THC»S GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLF ORGANIC ANALYSIS
W»TEB
EtxPl.r ijt.i Rr.f i?2"i rvrr;
PROJECT NO. | 8b-306 PROGRAM CLEWENT I RCRA
SOURCE! AMEPICAf CYANAMID
CITY I HILTON STATE! *X
STATION I.D.I ST-1,Oil 15,HQA01S
STURET STATluN NO!
sample COLLECTIONI START OATE/TImF 13/06/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTinNI STOP nATC/TI«r no/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY| RgrcTVED FRO"!
SAMPLE REC'Ol DATF/TIMe 00/O0/0" PEC'D PYl
SEALER 1
CHEMIST! CHW
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE *0.» 1111 ORG SAMPLF Niji n
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC ) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMAP*! NATIOMAL GROUNDWATER 81JRVFY
REMARK I
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED PY» TBB
•••REMARKS***
AT A VERIFIED BY I CHH
• WA-NOT ANALYZED »NAX-lNlp;pFERtNCES
"Vir EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
•••FOOTNOTES**#
*A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTI _ _ _
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LFSS THAN VALUE GIVFN
•l-actuai. value ts known to be gpeater than value given
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOP B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER
THE MIWttMUM OL'AWTTTATTrjt' LIIT
' Pfc.SULTS
2"U
20U
2ou
20U
20U
20U
JOU
20>.
20U
2"U
20U
2"U
20U
2nu
2"u
2"U
^nu
2"u
2nu
2ou
2"U
20U
2"U
2 0 u
20u
2°U
Sou
2f>o
2no
2ou
2"U
20U
2"U
20U
200
4nu
2ou
2 0 ll
2nu
200
2°U
20U
2PU
20u
20U
200
• ** 2 Hi
20U
20U
20U
MATERIAL 1«0U
IS
100U
loot)
mou
UNITS
UG/L
. I'G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
''G/i.
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L.
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/l
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/C
"G/L
UG/L
COMPOONP
1 > J-DlCHLUHOtttnZtNt
i.J-UlCHLUKOtttNZLNt
I,i-DICHLUKObENZENt
BIS(2-CHLUK0ETHYL) KTHtR
HEXACHLOHOtTHANE
HISCj-CHLUHOJaOPHOPIL) ETHfcR
w-r 1 T»uSQni«N-t>ROH* LiAmIne
N T 1 H"ofitN2(i,p(F.
H^AACHLOKUb"l'AOIbNb
1»2.4-TRlCHLURuBtNZt«E
naphthalene
BISCZ-CHLOKOETHOXt) METHANE
1SOPHOHONK
HEAACHLUROCYCLUPtNTApIENb CHCCP)
2-chlokonaphthalene
ACtNAPHTnYLENE
ACCNAPhTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALAIK
2,4-UINITROTULUENt
2,6-DInITRUTULUEnk:
4-CHLUHOPNEMfL PHtNIL ETnth
KLUOHENE
UltTHYi, PHTHALATE
N»NIXRUSUDiPMEN YlAMINE/DXPhENILAMJLNE
HEXACHLOHUBENZENfc IHCH)
4-bP0*0PHENYL phenyl EXHfcH
phenanthbene
AN2HHACENE
UI-N-HUTYLPHTHALATE
FI.UORANTHENE
PYrFNE)
bFNZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
B16(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATfc
EiENZOCA) ANl'HKACENE
CHKYSENE
3,3'-UICHLUROBENZXOlNe
UI-N.OCTILPHTHALATfc
BENZGlb ANO/UR KJKLUUHANXHENt
BEnZO(B AND/OR KJf'LUOBANTHENE
bEnZU-A-PYKENE
inueno (1,2.3-cnj pikene
DIBEnZO(A» H)ANTHKACENE
BENZ0(GHI)PEHYLENE
2-CHLOHOPHENUL
2-NlTPOPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-OIMETHXLPHENOL
2»4-DICHLUHOPHENUL
2,4.6-XRlCHLUROPHtNUL
4-CHLOKO-3-METHYLPHtNOl>
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2«METHYL-4.(>«DlNlxRUPHbNUL
PF.NTaCHLOROPHENOL
4"NIJROPHEnOL
-------
tm.ua emeu
07/17/86 FXTRACTABLF ORGANIC ANALYSIS
HATE"
?*•"*!* *!?*,? ®6<"1'2^3 **vPt** tvofj mPm«-
PROJECT NO | 86-306 PROGRAM ET,EVENT! RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CY*N*Mlu
CITY! MlLTUf) STATEl rL
STATION I,D.l M*-5,Ot 1 04,*0*004
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TlM*" OJ/04/Rb
SAMPLE COLLECT ION I STOP 0ATE/TIMF Oo/00/OO
COLLECTEO BY I RFTET VED FRO*|
SAMPLE REC'D: D»tE/TI*E 00/00/00 RFC 10 RY!
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
INORG SAMPLE NO,! "0
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE MOl P
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC1 I
CONTRACT LABORATORY fINORGANIC)I
REMARK! MTIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED RY| TBB DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVEFAGe VALUE •na.NQT ANALYZED «NAI-INTEprERENCES
•.i-estimated value •n-presumpttVf: evidence or presence of material
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO P* L'SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACflJAT, VALUE is KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE RIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B'lT NOT DETECTED. T«E NUMBER IS
THF MNIIMUM OPAVTITATIOM LIMIT,
Qwruinu
1 , 3-OlCHl.OhOBENXENt
li4-lJlCHLaKUBfe;NSfc«£
I, 2-DICHLOROflEHZENE ~ T""" :
bI6(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER
HEXACHLOROETMANE
BI6(2-CHLOROISOPRUPIL) ETHER
n-nitposodi-n-propjla«inf
4.tTDnagg^s«j
HFAACHLOKOeUXADlMt
1« 2 •4"IR1CHLURUBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
bIS(2-CHLUK0gTH0XX) MEIMANt
I5UPHOHONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENlAOIENt IHCCfJ
2"CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLEhE
ACtNAPrtThENE
DIMETHYL, PHThALATE
2.4-DINITROTQLUENE
2.6-DInIIROTOLUEnE
4-chluhohhenkl phenyl ether
fl.UOKEUE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
M»N I T^USOD 1 PHENYL AM lfiE/DlPHEM LAM INC
hEAACHLOHUBENZENE (HCB)
4-BR0'«UPHEnYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N.BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYPEwE ~
BF.hZYL BUTIL PHTHALATE
Ulb(2-ETHYLHbXYL) PH1HALATE
BENZUIAJANIHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3. 3'-UlCHLUR08ENZlDINE
UI-N-UCTYLPHTHALATE
UENZOCB ANU/UR Klr'LUURANTHENE
BFnZUCB AnD/UR K)FLUD"AUTHEXE
bewzo-a-pykene
1NOENO C1.2fi-CD) P«RE*E
UIbENZU CAt H)ANTHRACENE
BENZOC GHI)PERYLERE
2-CHLOROPHENUL
2"NITROPHEnDL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHE"0L
2>4-UlCHLOKOPHENUU
2,4,6-TRlCHL(JR0PHENUL
4-CHLOHO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2»4-DINITROPHENOL
2-«ETHYL"4,6«DlNITRUPHENUL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITHOPHENOL
-------
mm men
07/17/86
PXTRACTAPLF ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATEP
S- i-r.iT 'JO.! C6rt'ie'
rir i - r r «
PROJECT NO,! 86-306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTl RCPA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMIo
CITY I MILTON STATE! PL
STATION 1,0,1 M*-13,01t2t,MOAO?1
STORET STU
UG/L
2"u
"G/L
2^u
UG/L
20U
UG/L
2nu
"G/L
20u
UG/L
2nu
UG/L
20U
UG/L
2ou
"G/L
20U
UG/L
2"u
UG/L
2011
"G/L
20u
"G/L
20U
UC/L
2ou
"G/L
2"U
UG/L
20U
"G/L
20U
UG/L
20U
"G/L
20U
"G/L
20U
UG/L
2PU
"G/L
40U
UG/L
2nu
UG/L
20U
"G'L
2"U
"G/L
20U
UG/L
20||
"G/L
2nu
UG/L
20U
UG/L
20U
UG/L
2"U
"G/L
20U
UG/L
20U
UG/L
2nU
UG/L
20U
UG/L
anu
UG/L
i 100U
UG/L
inou
UG/L
100'J
UG/L
100"
UG/L
mPuiitta
1 , J-UICHLUHOllKnZtNt
1,4-pICHLOHObENZliNt
1.2-DlCHLORObEhZfcNE - -
bI6(2»CHL0ROETHYL) klTHbH
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BlS>(2-CHLOH01SUPHUP*L) ETHtR
N-NlTROSiiOI-N-PROPiLAMlNE
1A Wurit,r«fcf,rtE
HEAACHLOHObU'iAUlfcNfc
).2,4-TRiCHLUKOBfcMZfchE
NAPHTHALENE
BISX2-CHLnHntTH0*T ) HElMANfc.
1SUPHOH0NE
hEXACHLOROCYUUPENIADIfcNt IHCCP)
2-CHLORONAPHTHADtNE
ACfcNAPHTHYLENE
ACfcNAPHThENt
UIHEXHXL HMTMALAlt
2 t 4»l)IN ITROTOLUENE
2>b-UlNlTRUTULUENK
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHtlnYL LTrtER
ELUOKENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N»N I TRUSOOiPHEN YLAM1NE / DIPHEML AMINE
HEAACHbOHObENZtNt (hCBJ
4-UROMUPHENYL PHi"*L ETHEH
PHENANTHHENE
ANTHHACENE
DI-N-BUTJLPHTHALATE
* luoranthene
pyhene
BENZkL BUTYL PHTHALATE
bIS(2-tTHYLHEXYL) PHIHALAlt
BENZU(A)AN1HKACENE
chhysene
3>3''UXCHL0RUBENZXU1NE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALArE
bENZUCB ANO/UR KlfLUUHANfMCNfc
bENZOCB AND/OR K)rLUORANTHENE
bEKZU-A-PYKENE
1NUENH (1r 2(J-CDJ P X HEME
DIBENZUtA,H)ANTHRACENE
BEN201GH1JPERYLENE
2-CHLOKOPHENUL
2-NITKUPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHKLPHENOL
2»4-DiCHLOKOPHfcNUL
2#4.6»TRiCHLOROPHENUL
4-CHLOHn-3-MfcTHYLPHEhUL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL«4,6-DINlTKUPHENUL
pentachlurophenol
4-nITKOPHENOL
-------
07/17/86
m.w.nc tv
ATHENS G'OPGIA
BXTRACTABLF ORGANIC ANALYSIS
w*te»
./
J
'P* F T*
PROJECT NO.I 06-306
SOURCEt AMERICAN CYANAMID
" TON
PROCBAh EI.E"FNTI RCPA
. D
CITYl MILTON STaTEI ru
STATION 1,0,1 1W-10,Cll 108,MOA009
STORET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TImE 03/05/96
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STnP OATE/TTMF no/00/00
RECETVEP FROM|
DATE/TIME 0O/O0/0" REC'D RJfl
COLLECTED BY I
SAMPLE REC'ni
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHODl
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D
CONTRACT LABOR ATOPY(ORGANIC)t
CONTRACT LAPOPATORYtlNORGANIC)J
REMARK* NATIONAL GROUNQWaTEH SURVfY
REMARK|
INORG SAMPLE NO,I MO
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TIB
•••REMARKS***
TATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-EStlMATEO VALUE
•NA-NOT ANALYZED • NAWNTERFERENCES
_ . •N-PRESUHPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LFS5 THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO p| GREATER THAN VaIUE GIVEN
•Q-MATeRiAL #AS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE MINUMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
PtSULlS
inu
2ou
20U
20U
20U
20U
2ou
2"'
2"U
20U
2nu
Sou
2nu
20U
2"U
20U
2"U
2nu
20U
20U
2fU
20U
2 °U
2"u
20U
2°U
20U
20U
2"U
20U
20U
20U
2ou
2«U
2ou
40U
20U
20u
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
2 r>u
20U
2ou
2ou
20U
2"U
20U
10uU
inou
100U
1P0U
UG/L
UG/L
UNITS COMPOUND
UG/L 1,3-UICHlOKOBEnZEnK
Sg't l:3:8^WSbSir.t—.
UG/L blS (2"CHL0R0tTHYLJ KTHER
"G/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
UG/L BIS(2-QHLUR0ISUPKUPXL1 ETHtH
UG/L N-MTR"Sor>I-N-PROPYl.AMIN£
''G/\ :;T'iTurt: fct.r
-------
fPtmfsn,g£C rv
ATHENS GFPBGIA
07/17/86 FXTRACTABLF ORfiA"IC ANALYSIS
NATE"
SIUPT F «int| mn T)H( «»• ¦ » k rvrr, 1,1-1(0*1
PRO.JECT NO, I 86-306 PROGR&M ETCENTl RCPA
SOURCE I ANEP IC AN CYANAMd
CITYl xlbTON ST»Tfi *L
STATION I.D.i **-74,(11 H 3»*OAr)| 3
STO«ET STATION KOI
SAMPLE COLLFCTlnM START PATE/TIMF n3/05/«6
SAMPLE COMjECTinNl STOP DATE /TT O0/0O/n0
OLLECTED BY I »E<"ETVED FBO^I
ANPLF REC'm patf/tI^E nn/oo/o" REC'P hki
SEALED|
CHE"1ST| chh
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
ASE NO.I 1111 ORG SA^PLF noj n INORG SAMPLE NO,J *L>
ONTPACT LABORATOPYtOPGANlOl
CONTRACT LABn«>ATnPy(I,JOPGANTCl I
RemaRki national c-poundwatep supvf:*
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VE«IFIEP BY I TBB PATA VERIFItP BYl CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTE?***
• A-AVEPAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-lNlEuFEREfcCES
•j-estimated value *n-ppfsii*ptivf evidence of presence of material
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 18 KNOWN TO BE LFflS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual value is known to be gpeateh than value given
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 9"T NOT DFTFCTEO, THE NUMBER IS
THE minumiim QUANTITATION LIuIT .
COMPOUND
1,J-uiCHLnxouEhZtNb
1,4-UlCHLOHOBEWZENE
1,2-DlCHlOHOBENZENi . "V
BIS ( 2-CHLUKOLTHYLJ fcl'HKR
HEXACHLOHOtTHAME
BI6(2-CHLOR01SUPKUPIL) ETHtR
N-MTPOSoDI-N-PRUf XLAMINE
NITPUBENZE.iF
HEAACHLdHOBUlAOItNt
1.2.4-TRlCMLOKuBtNZtNfc
NAPHTHALENE
bIt>(2-CHLOKOi.THOA)f) MElHANt
ISUPHOHONE
HEXACHLOKUCICLUPbNtAOltNt (HCCf)
2-CHLnRONAPHTHALENE
ACtNAPhTH K LENE
ACtNAPHThENE
UI^ETHXL PHThALATE
2r4-l)INITROTOLUEhE
i,b-L)If.ITP0TULUEf.t
4-C HLUKOPHfcN X b PMtNIii ETHER
rLUOHENE
L>l£.TMYL PHTHALATt
h-MTHUSUOIPMENYliAMlNt/DiPHEN YLAMINE
HEXACHLOHOBlhZtNfc IHCB1
4-HRO"UP(lENYL PHt**L ETHER
PHtNANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
LlI-N-BuTXLPHTHALATt
FLUOHAKTMENE
HYKEnE
BEnZYL BUTYL PrtTHALATE
BlS(2"ETHYiiHEXYLJ PhJHALATfc
bENZUlA) ANTHKACEHiC
CHHYSENE
J# 3'-lUCHLORUBENilOINE
DI-N-UCTYLPHTHALATi
BEN ZD CB ANU/UR K)tLUORANTHfcNfc
bENZuCB ArtU/uH K)KLUClPANTH£NE
BEnZU-A-PYHEmE
1NUE/»U (I,2,3-CD) PYKEnE
UIBENZOCAffOANTHRACfcHE
BFNZO(GHIJPERTLERE
2-CHLOkUPHfcNUL
2-hITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIHETHILPHENOL
2»4-UICHLOROPHENUL
I,4,6-TRICHLURuPHeNUL
4-CHLURO-3-«tTHYLfHEhOlj
2#4-DIMT"UPHENOL
2-NEIHYL"4,6-PINlTRUPHtNOL
PENTAChLORUPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
-------
tel
X
I
oc w z
I u »-•
X 'Vl
H ^
' 4 X-3
Jiuw b>«
c sz«-» ox
'j)«ral~) X3
N«M>MHU4V3^
ixi oca
0,1 I I w
ZZ X <2
dil < JU
—iffl o a.^3
3D X 0<
*
Z.
w
£
X X
H i]
Q r
N. —<%r+
usu
2U
Ht J
id
H
<
J
<*
il'dUU < Z
r«S XUUHHHZ XQ.U>«U XU
«Sj)K UOi4ZX97i) H-tOZI 1Z
TUZ OUO<>4UXKKX XDOUUUJU
i^«J-3ZflCZri HHQi Q.JXXXZMX
OaJXOODHhJHHOU lOOOiXUHH
3 !
X
J UJ
3! X
I -J* a
Di] 3
ZSi A
JJUA.I H
ezaxDzo
wr-«-» Idi^XCHZ
CCXOCtXU I Z* J jCXKHUDU
OhOOZ^KKO-J &0.3UB l«J
ttiwu w^Ezo 5o*3rE<©ft.o
saiaoxNCQiUz hsxiooz
jjzzx»*rcu xou^k«xu
H4-4IHIOX
Sh^UUH • <
id«HUAia<
uiaoH^ja
XUHSk>«X3
t 1 x 1 cioiatwHOw>.trizu-iapOOIP4iWNtoic>«r««r4o«r*ic»ir«.,Hr*«r4fNrv^^c4^^^ir<40«r<«04ir>4.'^(Hr4r^c»w<^««^
si
^ nfi
\ 3*
s. *?
b.
J
a
x
mm
z.
b
X
a.
u
X
>¦
«¦
J
t
H
>4
£
a
X
(A
U
<
~*
M
»-*
C
CO
AC
90
&
<
>-
a
cr
JU
u
c
-9
«
u
sOO
ou
K
hi
<«
IC
cr
CDC
aa
O
M
X
\\
u.
X
fa.
«
H
r»-o
00
0
M
M
OU
'
U
X
\\
U)
U
M
r-
u ^
ma
>
>
?a
e
X fc-
cc
M
«(¦>
r*
u
u
>4
<
tfh
r
«3 -
kb.
t
W
1-
a«
*-
u w
XT
U.
>
4
OX
L
fr-
MM
ao
O
0-
c
-
X
a
2
V*
f-H
M
0On
£3
fC
w
2
«
ie«x
AC
0
IC
ou
% M
M ••
u
••
caa
V?
fa)
m
(00
zz
0
000
M
• X
«j:r
oc
¦ff
0
HK
•3
fa.
»a
MM
O
X
<«
<
M
»l)
X
l-l-
h
naa
Z
0c
m
-3
uu
mm mm
u
-00
O
u
*
wftZ
•H
uh:
>*c
XX
M&C
H
>
~
•WO
OH
jj
«•
X
H«
H
'*
OZh
*<
»3iJ
UJ
J J
<
0
!«A
HH
OO
QU
<
M
X
0
X
M
<0
UCI
to.
-0
J
a
«D
H«S
X
H —
HH
ouu
M M
«
V
%jUi
CH
Ufa)
I'lufl
10 H
z««c
k:
X
r-
UIU-
Mb)
JO
UJU
MX
KK
accc
<<
•a
u
•^oc>-
I-or
frfr
X J
Uf-h
a
a
x.
09H
<0
XX
u<
V)ZZ
cc
z
.*
r-
aon
l-H
<«
o
0
At«6U
CO US
U<0«0
IN
UW
acat
to
*
uuio-M
X IOONH
tZZZM
<»-
totozt*
1uHh << x
~ o»jp
«uu
UHUU«
H.*n***
: *
~ i
-------
m.M/rt/r
Q7/17/B6
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
SA"*PI.E '40. I fifif 1 ?2hj Sn *rLt 1V r *•-1 ui'n-»«
PROJECT NO.t 96-306 PROGRAM El.E»ENTl RCRA
S0URCEI AMERICAN CYANAMId
CITY t MILTON STaTKI FL
STATION 1,0,1 BAILER EQUIP *LA*IC ,0 1 1 05 , MO*005
STORET STAtIoi" NUi
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI START DATE/TI-* <>3/04/H(>
SAMPLE COt.LECTlPNI STOP flATE/TTMF fto/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY J
SAMPLE PEC'Dl DATE/TI«ie
SEALED1
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHODJ
CASE NO. I Mil ORG SAMPLE NQt D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OBGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGAnIC) 1
REMARK J NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKl
PE^ETVED FRO*I
00/00/00 REC'D «Yt
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MU
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl
•••REMARKS***
tub
DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
•••FOOTNOTES*#*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *na-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTFRFEPENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
~L-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE dlV£N
•U-filTERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE HINTTMTIM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
^OU
20U
2nu
20U
20U
20u
20U
2Au
20U
2 0U
20U
20U
20U
20u
2ou
2ou
20U
20U
2ou
20U
MATERIAL 100U
100"
|1UU
oou
"NlTS CIlnPOUhD
I'G'li 1 , J-DlCHLOKUBElKZfcNt
m tiiswrattf-
"G/L, bIS(2-CHLUH0tTHYLJ ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
UG/L bTfcf2»CHL0RniSUPKUPtL) ETHfcP
UG/L N-nITRUSuDI-N-PRUPYLAmInE
'IG/L WllMUHtNiENt
UG/L HEAACHLORObUTADItNE
11G/L li2/4-TRICHLOKUBfcNJKNE
UG/L NAPHTHALENE
UG/L bIM2-CHLOROETHUX)t) NETHANk.
UG/L ISUPHOHONE
UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLUPENIAUItNt (HCCPJ
UG/L 2-CHLOKONAPHTHALENf
UG/L ACtNAPHTHlLEUE
UG/L ACbNAPHTHENE
"G/L LIMETHXL PHTHAfcATE
UG/L 2»4"0INIT"UTULUEnK
UG/L 2.6-DlNllRUT0LUE(,K
UG/L 4-CHL0K0PHENYL PHtNIL EThER
"G/L FLUOHEhE
I'G/L UIKTHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L N-MTHOSOOiPHENYLANINE/DlPHENYLANlNE
UG/L HEX AC HLOROHENZENfc (MCBJ
UG/L 4-bROMuPHENYL PHfcNlL ETHEH
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANXHKACENE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHIHALAT6
I'G/L KLUOKANTHENE
i'G/L PYRENE " " "
UG/L BEhZKL BUTXL PHTHALATE
UG/L HI&12-ETH1LHISXXL) PHTHALATt
UG/L bENZOCAJAMTHHACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L 3,i'-DlCHLOROBENZl01NE
UG/L DI-N-OCTKLPHTHALATE
UG/L bENZOCU ANU/OR K1fLUORANTHENE
UG/L BF>ZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORAMHENE
ug/l BENZ0-A-PY8ENE
UG/L INDENtl ( 1 > 2< 3»CD) PIHENE
UG/L DIbENZU(A«H)ANTHKACfcNE
UG/L BENZO(GHIJPEHtLENE
UG/L 2-CHLOKOPHfcNOL
UG/L 2-MTBUPHENOL
UG/L PHtNUL
"G/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
UG/L 2»4-UlCHLOKnPHENUL
UG/L 2 » 4 .o-TRICHLUKOPHKMJL
UG/L 4-CHLOHO-3-MfcTHYLPHEl»OL
UG/L 2 » 4-DINITROPHENOL
"G/L 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITHOPHEN0L
UG/L PENTACHLUBOPHENOL
"G/L 4-NITROPHENOL
-------
WOttGU
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
WATER
M",t e6C!?20fi ftAMPl' TVP*S P"hr»LK
ES8 2'UlCHLOROBENZtNE :—
HI6(2«CHL0K0CTHYLJ ETHfcH
HEXACHLOROETHANE
bI6C2-CHL0RaiS0PHUPIb) ETHER
N-MTROSOfl-N-PROPTLAMINE
N1 :RL>BEN£L..Z
HEXACHLOHOuUIAOItNt
II i, 4-TPlCHL0H0Be"3t:NE
mAPHTHALENE
blb.C^'CHLDKOtTHOXX) MKTHANt
1SUPH0K0NE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPfcNTADIfcNfc IHCCP)
2>chloronaphtnalene
ACf aPHTH YLENE
ACLNAPnTHEME
UIMETHKL PrtThAiiAft
S,4-0IMTW0T0LuE«E
2. t>-DINITHuT^LUENE
4-C^LOkOPHt•;NYL PHt.MlL ETHER
tLbORENE
uttTMYL PHTHALATE
N-NITRUSOPlPHENYLANXNE/OiPHENILAMINfc
HEXACHLOROBEwZENt IHCBJ
4-UROMQPhEMTL PHfcN)(b ETHEH
Phenanthhene
anthracene
di-n.butylphthalate
fluoranthene
PYKEnE
BEMZYL BUTJiL phthalate
bi&(2-ethylhexylj Phthalate
3.3'aDlCHLOROBENZiUINE
DI-N>OCTYLfHTHALAT«:
bENZQCb ANP/UK KjFLUURANTHENE
BEftZOlb ANU/UR KjFLuuHAnTHEnE
bENZU-A-PYhEhE
INDENO (1>2(3-CD) PIKENE
§IBENZU(AfH)ANTHRACENE
ENZOfGHliPERYLENE
2•CHLOKOPHENOL
2-MTPUPHtMOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIHETHJLPHEHOL
2, 4-DICHLOROPHENOl)
2>4,6-TRICHL0KUPHENUL
4»CHLORO»3"METHYLPH6NOL
2,4-DINITROPHEIfOL
2-METHKL-4, 6-DINlTRUpHCNOl,
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
4-MIROPhENOL
-------
Q1SX7/9*
rXTRACTA«LK ORGANIC ANALYSIS
W*TC»
sample «#n. i flftri?2*4
TVP«r ;
i ~ r»t-i • ir
PROGRAM ET.EMFNTl pcra
ST»T|.-1 rt
PROJECT ND.l 86-306
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMlD
CITY t MILTON
STATION I D I FIELD BI.ANK,Q1 106, MO*n06
8T0RET STllTtON N0»
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 0J/04/8t>
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP nATE/TTMF no/00/00
COLLECTED BY|
Sample Rec ' nt da
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHODt
'KrE I VEU FROM t
Tfr/TiMe on/no/on Rton pyi
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOi n
CONTRACT LABORATORY (DRliANlC) I
CONTRACT LAWOMATHRY ( INijPGAnIO I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER PURVEY
REMARK|
tNORG SAMPLt Nfl.1 MU
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBH
•••REMARKS*«»
PATA VERIKIEO BY? CHH
•N4.M0T ANALYZED
•NAI-INTKrFERENCES
••»FOOTMOTES«»»
•A-AVERACE VALUE . .... .......
•J-ESTimATED VALUE #N-PRE5UmPTT9e EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UE MATERIAL
• K-ACHIAL VALUE TS KVOWN TO ftr LwSS THAN VIlLUE GIVFN
• L-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOrfN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE r.lVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED EOf* 0ttT NOT DETECTED. T"E NUMBER IS
TME MINlTMIIW OIIANTITATTUW M»IT,
2 o U
j* g
Sou
2«U
¦J 1 •)
^ou
20U
ilnli
^ou
iiou
2ou
2"u
20U
2nij
2ou
2ou
2nu
2nu
20(1
2nij
20U
2 Hi
200
2nu
2ou
ami
2nU
2"U
2"U
20U
2'Hj
20U
40U
2nu
2"U
2f>U
2n(j
2"U
2"U
20U
20u
2 OU
20U
20U
^nu
5 on
2r>u
1 "Olt
ino"
iioo
1/to I.I
' t r* * -m: n v ¦
ii«E !:S:Kiist8E88iCIIEt
Ue/L UlUI2«CHl,UHOKTHYIil tinbK
Ub/L HKXKCHIjOHOCTHANC
U6/L B1 <•( 2«CHLOH01SOPMUPXi.J ETHfcR
IIC/L N>NiTRySuOI>N-i>FOI,YbAMlN£
'.'C/:. f. [TPUHCWZffhK
UKi/L nKAAl'MLOHUtHJIAQl t«t
t'G/U I , i, 4-TRlCHLUHUBtKZKNE
UG/L NAPHTHALENE
I'ti/L. BIbl 2-CHLUnniiTHOX* j HETHANE
ug/l xsopmuhOne
"G/L HEX AC HLOROC YC IjUPfJ AylfcNfc' IHCCFJ
UG/L 2-chloronaPhthalene
UG/L ACbNAPHTHYLENK
UG/L ACtNAHHTHt'Nt
UG/L DIMETHYL PHThAjbAi'K
UG/L 2/4-DII.lTHUTOLUENt
UG/L 2»t>"L>lNl 1RUTULUENK.
"G/L 4-CHL<)H0PHfc.N?L PHtNIL tThEH
UG/L KLUOkENE
t'f./L PltTHYL PHTHALATt
UG/L N-HIIRUSUDiPHENYLAMINE/DlPhEMYLAHINfc
I'G/L HEXACHLOKOBENZLNt CUC'HJ
IIG/L 4-BHUMUPHENIfL PHfcuil, EXHfcR
UG/L PHtNANTHRENE
IJG/L AMTHHACENE
UG/L LI-N-bUTYLPHXHALAie
UG/L J'LUHR ANTHENE
IK./L PVhENE
UG/L HEnZib BUTYL PHTHALAIE
UG/L bISC2-tTHYLHCXYL) PMTHALATE
UG/L BENZUtAUNl'HKACENt
UG/L CHhYSEhE
UG/L J, J'-rUCHLyHUHfcNZIiUwE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALAXE
UG/L BENZUCB ANU/UR KjrLUORANiHfcNfc
UG/L BEnZOCB AND/OR KjrtUuKANTHENE
UG/L BK«ZO-A-PYi
-------
EXTBACtABlK Oj|^«ie ANALYSIS
8A»»PLE «r<.- S6ri?2"K
* i"r'
PROJECT NO
80URC~ ""
CITY
CCT NO,I 86-306 P
CEI AMERICA* CYANAMID
I MILTON
PROGRAM CIEMENTI RCM
STaTCI *L
station i.D.j rrebD blank,ot109,^0*009
6TOPET STATfON WOI
fample collectioni start oate/tioj/os/Rb
AMPLE COLLECTION I STOP DATE/TI ME "0/00/00
COLLECTED BYl PECETVED FRO*l
SAMPLE REC1D t DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC ' D HU
SEALEtlf
CHE^ISTt CHH
analytical methodi
CASE NO, I 11U ORG SAMPLE NOl D
Contract LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
Contract l*boratory(inorganioi
REMARK1 NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVn
REMARK t
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY t TUB
**«REwARKS»«#
rata VERIFIED PYl CHH
¦»«»r00TN0TES«*»
•A-AV|pAC,E VALUE ~NA-NQT ANALYZED «nai-interferences
~J-EsTImATED VALUE «N-PREfiOMPTT?r EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVFN
• L-ACTtiAI- VM.UE TS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VaMIF GIVEN
•U-MATERIAl WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIlfltIM
Sou
2ou
2nu
2ou
2nu
2ou
sou
20U
vnu
20U
20U
20U
2ou
<»ou
200
in
2«u
2ou
2ou
20 u
20U
20U
2ftU
20U
20U
Sou
2ou
10 on
100U
100U
loou
. XlCq/fc
liS/L
UC/L
UG/C
mi
UQ/b
m
UQ/h
1JG/L
«
t'G/L
UG/L
UG/L
VQ/l
UG/L
ntf/ii
"G/li
UG/L
UG/L
U a/h
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
«
UG/L
tiQ/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Kgft
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
'[l=gfppB§|i£li3i
1 *HLUgOtTH*ii) Bl'HIiR
lofiokTHAh(
'Miss!
?ROf»>
sigHsSSfesssasiJ
N J IBOHtNlKdr.
HEXACHi,aftOUUTAOXfc«f
1 . W.4«TPlCHL.aRUBKNZKNE
NAPHTHALENE
bI84J"CHLOBOBTHOAt) MCTHANt
ISOPHOftONE
HEXACHLORCiCYCLOPENTAOXKNE (HCCfJ
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ACfcNAPHTMILENE
ACENAPHTMENE
tfTMETHYL PHTHALAIE
2,4-DINITROTULUENE
2/b-UlNltKUTOLUEflK
4-CHLORUPHENXL PhtNIL fcThtH
KLUOKENE
UlbTHYL PHTHALATE
H«NITHUSOOIPHENYLAMXNK/DAPHFNYLAMINK
HRXACHLOHUbENZENt. (.HCHJ
4-bPOMOPMENYL PHENXL ETHKR
HHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
Ut-N-BUTYbPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYREnE
bENZKL HUTKL PHTHALAIE
Bia(2-ETMYLHEXKLJ PMTHALATfc
bENZOIA)ANTHRACENE
CMRYSENE
J.31-DJCHLOHOBENZitUNE
yl-N-UCTKLPHTHALATf
tiKNZlHB ANti/OR KjrLuOKANTHENE
BENZO(B ANU/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
bFWZU-A-PYHENE
1NOENO 11 # 2.3"CD) PXkENE
uiuenzoca>h)anthAacene
BKNZO(CHI)PERILENE
2-CHLUHOPHENOL
2-NITHUPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHEWOL
2# 4"DICHLOKOPHENOL
2,b-TRXCHLURUPHENUL
4»CHL0HO"3"METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHEKaC
2-«ETHYL-«»6-DlNITHUPHEN0L
PEMTACHLOROPHENOL
4-ftITROPHENOL
-------
O7/17/86
»T«r*/i eroBci
eXTR*CTABt,K OPI5»MJC »N«l,r6TS
WATBn
'.'•TWl NO.t ««ci?30n
SATtE TVp^j Br.Kw*
PROJECT NO.I 86-306
JOUfeCEI.^MgRlCAN CYANAMlD
CITYl MILTON
PR0GR*M et.ementi rcra
3T*TEI FL
STORET ST
N NO I
SAMPLC C0LtECTION| START nATB/TIMP OJ/07/8«>
samplf cqllectioni stop oate/timf no/oo/no
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FROu|
SAMPLE RECTI OATE/TI*E OO/OO/OO REC'0 HYi
SEALED|
chemisti CHH
analytical, methodi
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE *01 n
CONTRACT LAbOHATllPY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY?INORGANIC)!
NATIONAL groundwater supvfy
INOPG SAMPLE NO,! Mlj
REMARK |
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB
•••REMARKS###
data VFRirten by» chh
•••FOOTNOTES###
•a-avepage value •NA-NOT ANALYZED #NAWNTFRTERENCES
•J«£STImATED VALUE #N-PRRSUMPTm EVIDENCE OF PRESFNCE OF MATERIAL
•k-aCTUAl value is known to Br lfss Than value GivrN
•l-actuai. value is known to greater than value given
•U-MATEHIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETFCTEO, THE M'MBER TS
THE MI NtJMUM OUAMTITATTOV MM IT
¦ K5UI.1."
^ n u
jnu
Sou
Sou
|i
aou
anij
20U
aou
anu
Sou
2ou
2fH'
2nU
jnu
2ou
2ou
2nu
2 ou
2*1)
20u
2nU
2^1.1
20U
2ou
j!OU
2f>U
2"U
arn.1
20U
^ou
40U
20U
20U
20IJ
21U
2nu
20U
2ou
2"U
2ou
2"U
20U
2"U
2f>U
20U
100"
10011
Inyli
inulJ
UNI i
riG/li
HSJfc
"tt/l.
UQ/lt
HG/L.
t'G/L
"G/L
"G/L
IIQ/u
I'G/L
"G/L
"G/L
I'G/L
I'G/L
"G/L
I'G/L
t'G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
lnT'UUnn
l # j-uJCHtuiiriu^N7.iiniL
IIa-DICHLnROBEHZENI
bI6 t 2-CHLOKOfcTHYlj ) KTHLR
NKXOCHLOMUtTnKNC
BI6C2-CHLOHOX6UPHUPIL) ETHKH
H-NIXRO«ODl-N-PF>Ot'*L*MlNt
MTT°Ut"SNB«rNIS
HKAACHLnHUBlllAultUt
I,i,4-XRlCMLOHUHtNZfcNE
NAPHTHALENE
BIS(2-CHLOHOETHOAX ) METHANE
I6UPH"H0l»E
HEAACHLOHUCYCLOPKNTAUIbNb IHCCP)
2"CHLOHONAPHTHALENt
ACtNAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPMTHENE
DIMETHYL FhTHAL*ie:
i,4-DInITHOTOLUENE
2. b-DlMTRUTULUENE
4-CHLOKOPHtNKL PHtN
-------
OT/'l 7/(>
EXT BACTAHLC OOSHHIC ANALYSIS, MKC
DATA RCPOBTIwc SHEET
MATE n
SampI/K xn.! •:.ci?2"»a svrtr ryr^. -o-"v
PROJECT NO,I 06-306 PRQCHAM BtiEMfNTl RCPA
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANA«I|>
CITY I MILTON 3T*T|r| rL
STATION I.O.I «W»l9,OniO#HQAOlo
STURET STATION N0«
SAMPLE COLLKCTlnNI START DATE/TIM* 03/05/R6
SAMPLE COLLECTION) STOP OATE/TIME <>0/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FR0»M
SAMPLE REC'Ol DATE,/TIME 0O/0O/f>0 REC ' D B Y I
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CUP
ANALYTICAL METHODl
ASE NO,I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOi D IN0PG SAMPLE NC.I MD
ONTRACt LABORATOHY(ORGANTC) I
ONTRACT LABORATO°Y(INORGANTC)t
REMARKj NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TRB OATa VEPIFIEn PYt CHH
•••REMARKS*#*
•••FOOTNOTES***
• A-AVEOA0E VALUE «nA-N0T A^HYZEP *NAI«INTF.RFERENCES
•J-ESTlMATED VALUE •M-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Or PRESENCE Or MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNqWN TO BE l*SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K^OWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•u-material was analyzed for b"T not uetfcted, tme number ts
THE ESTIMATED MTNtMlJM UUANTITATTON LIMIT,
S nu j*"
ssuS
*8iJS
mtj
4 0Ul1
40UJ
40UJ
40yJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40 U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U0
40U.I
40UJ
4 0 U J
40yo
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
4O0.J
40UJ
4"UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U>7
40UJ
40UJ
4"UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4"UJ
40UJ
16UUJ
4"UJ
x m ¦ uo/¦ i, cuMwnuNu n Knr
MaHtlTKnSnUlNKTHlLAMlNI.
— _ ¦ -—
PXRXD1NC
tTHXLHCTHACRYLATE
MgTHYLMETHANFSULrONATE
N-NlTRnSODlETHYLAMINK
CTH?LnETHAN|j8ULrOwATt
PEN TACHLOHOETHANE
BGNZYLCnliORXDK
N-N 1 THOSOr VHHOL ID I NIC
ACETOPHENONg
N-NiThOSriMoRPHOLINE
n»TOLUT DINEHYDHOCMLOHIOE
N.NlTHnSOUTPIFEKIUINE
1.?,J-THICHLOHObENZtNfc
ftENZALCHLORIOE
ALPHA, ALPHA-OiMETHYliPHEMSIHKUAMlNt
2,6-OlCHLOROPHEKOL
0-PHENYLENEDIAMlNg
P-PHKNYLENEUlamine
HEXACHI.OHOPKOPENF
1,3,5-THlCHLOKOBENZENE
BENZOI'RlCHLUHXDfc
N-NlTKOSO-nl-N-BUTYLAMIKC
RE80RCIKOL
M-PHENYLENEDIAMINE
-TETBACBLOROBENZENE
1,2,3.5-TETRACHLORObENZfcNE
isnSAFRCLE
1.2.4.5-TtTHACHLORnBENZENt
1,4-nXPHTHOOIIINOVE
PENTACHLOHOBENZENt;
5-NlTRO-n-TULUlUINE
2-nAPHTHYLAMInE
1-NAPhThYLAMINE
2.1.4.6-TETKACHLHHOHHtNOL
ZINUPHOS
1.2-DIPHENYLHYDHAZlMt
TfcTRAETHYLDITHIOPXHOPHOSPHATE
1,3j5"THINI1R0BENZFNE
PHENACETIN
OlALbATE
D1METH0ATE
4-AMINnBIHHENYL
pK0NAMI0E
PENTACHLOHOMTRUBbNZENE
METHAPYRIIiENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
ARAMITE
-------
~ztt>ZZ*-c,?naZTu BenZTL ALCOHCU 1 '
20U 2-MGTHVIiPHENOIj i . «
20U 4-HETHYbPHENOb
iOuil BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLOROAhILINE
20U 2-METHYLNAPfiTHALENE
100" 2 4 9-TKICHLOHOPHCNUL
1O0U 2-NIThnANlLlNE
100" 3-NXTHOANiLINt
2ou niBKNantuhan
10011 4-MlTR0ANlLlNt
I
f
(
, C
i r
<
' (
¦i,
i-V
<
i •
(
-------
07/17/86
extbactable OKGANTC ANALYSIS, misc
DATA RFpORTING SHEET
WATEP
Kiusir «in, | s'^oir tvopj uguw^
PROJECT NQ,| 86-306 PROGRAM EtE"ENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMfipJCAN CYANAMID
CITYI MILTON STATEi FL
STATION I.O.I MW-21,01103,MOAO05
6TOPET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION I STOP HATE /TIM' 00/00/00
COLLECTED HY| PECETVED FPOMi
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE,/TIME 00/00/OQ PEC'D Bit
SEALED I
CHEMIST I CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO,I 1111 ORG SAMPLE VOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OPGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY (INORGANIC) |
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
sample log veritied byi tab oata veritied byi chh
•••REMARKS***
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
•••FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAG£ VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZED •NAI-INTTRFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIy* EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• IC-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
RESULTS
20UJ
20U.I
NA
~ OUJ
40UJ
40UJ
160UJ
40U.1
40UJ
4PU.J
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40U.7
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40 U J
40UJ
40UJ
40Ui)
4
-------
j&mjr jmpm* inuwhjj r wrf*
> Mi* tin. etc fr
athe*s crnBGlA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORG*NIC ANALYSIS. MISC
OATA REPORTING SHEET
water
SA«PT ,r N",l P(,ri,»2P? SUFLF TYPE I MC)Nt'.!
CONTINUED
PROJECT NO,I R6-J06 PROGRAM ETEMENTI RCRA
JmDRCEI AMERICAN CYANAMIn
TITYl HILTON STaTEI *h
STATION 1,0,1 H«-21,01103,MOA001
STORET STATION NOt
t AMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TTME 0J/03/86
AMPLE COLLECTION I STOP PATE/TI**" 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRU«I
SAMPLE REC'DJ DATE, /TIME 00/00/00 REC'D F«Y»
SEALED|
CHEMISTI JCm
analytical METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOt D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORYlINQRGANIC)!
INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY| TBB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
#••##•#*••••••••«*»«•«••#•#»#•••••••••••••••»•••••*••••••••••»«•
•••FOOTNOTES***
»k-act"al value is known to be less than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUE rs known TO be GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LI*IT,
f
RESULTS
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
NA
nA
20U
20U
20U
1O0U
20U
20U
10011
loun
100"
20U
100U
1000U
20 0«
200"
1000U
200UJ
200UJ
20 oo
200U
1000U
1000UJ
1000UJ
5000J
wrr/m mmww
1*1 UG/L COMPOUND NAME
P-DlMETHYLAMINOAZ0HtNZENt
WTxmmi,t »i««———
4,4*-METHYLENE-BI8(2-CHLUHUANlLlNE)
7,12-dimeihylbenzanthSackne
DIm£tH0XYi!enZ1DJnE
3 UM^rNTirir C~-~u"NOii
BENZYL ALCOHOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
4-METHYLPHEhOL
BENZOIC ACID
4-CHLOROAMLlNE
2-NITRnANXLlNE
3-NITK0AN1L1NE
nmENZOfURAN
4-NITH0ANILINE
BENZOIC ACID
2-METHYLPHEnOL
4-METHYLPHEKOL
2.4,5-TKICMLnR0PHEN0L
BENZYL ALCOHOL
4"CHLORUANILINE
DIBfcN JOflH AN
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINg
3-nItkoanIlIne
rGSIBBMttM
COMPOUNDS
-------
" 4IM—WJ fTTTF*
rPA-rsn,«eff fv
*TMEUS GFpRGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS* MlBC
DATA RrpOBTjVG SHEET
WATER
SAMPLE S"unI.r TYnE!
PROJECT NO,| B6-J06 PROGRAM ELEMENTl RCRA
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STaTF I Fl
STATION I.O.I MW-22,01107,NOA007
STCJRET STATION NOl
SAMPLF COLLECTIONI START DATE/TIM* 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP PATE/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYl PECETVFD FROM|
SAMPLE PEC 1DI DATE,/TIMF 00/00/00 REC'D BYl
SEALEDl
CHEMI5TI CLP
ANALYTICAL METHODI
INOPG SAMPLE NO.| MD
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NQl 0
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LAROR AT C1RYCIN ORGANIC)!
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK |
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY« TRB DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTZMATED VALUE • N.PRRSllMPTT VF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
(-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNgWN TO RE LFJS THAN VALUE GIVEN
.-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•K-ACTUAL VALUE rs KNOWN TO re LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATFRIAL HA8 ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
HfSULTS
20UJ
20UJ
NA
40UJ
40UJ
40u J
160UJ
4 011.1
40UJ
40U0
40U0
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.I
40UJ
40U.1
4J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.I
40 U.I
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40 U J
40UJ
40UJ
40U3
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4UUJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40MJ
160UJ
40U.J
MMwurrrcM wtw/ra*****
IN | UG/L C
-------
SAMpr.p: *"'»> AN*i,Y«ts management system
FTPA-ran. "M IV
Athens gfopcia
07/17/06 EXTRACTABLE ORGANTC ANALYSIS, MISC
data rfportinq sheet
hateb
SAMPLE rjri.l SAMPLE TYPFI MpNwij
CDNTIMUFD
PROJECT ND.I 06-306 PROGRAM ELEmENTI RCPA
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON 8TATM FL
STATION I.O.I tfw.22,QU07,M0A007
8TORET STAtJow NO»
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TTMF 03/04/B6
ample collfctioni stop date/ttm' no/oo/oo
SOLLECTFD QVI PECETVFD r«»0"»
AMPLE REC'ni DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 RtC'D PYl
SEALEDt
CHEMTSTI
ANALYTICAL METHODI
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOt D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANTC)I
CONTRACT LAHOPATOPlf {INOPGANTC) |
HEMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED »Y| TRH DATA VERIFIED BYt CHH
•••REMARKS***
INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
•••FOOTNOTES*••
• A-AVERAGE VALUE *N^NgT ANALYZED _ •NAI-XNIFKrERENCES
•J-E5TIMATE0 VALUE •N-PRESUmPTTVr FVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERjAl,
•K-AC*UAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TP BE GREATEP THAN VALUE GIVEN
•y-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUAN«TTT»TTON LIMIT,
.•.••»NkLrilC*L RESULTS>«.a<
HrSULtTS IN | UQ/L CUMk»OONO NAME
40U.1 P«DlM£THYli AHINOAZUBEM'^ENIL
«OUJ 4,4'-METHKbENE-Bl8tj-CHLUhUANILlNE)
40UJ 7,12-UIHETHYLBENZANtHftACENIC
N* 2-PICULINE
N* niMLTHOXYbENT.IPlNE
; 1*0.1 to U'!:r>E"T?r. . ~.l"" ,v
20U BENZYL ALCOHOL
20U 2-MtTHYLPHENOL
Sou 4»m£thylphs:hoL
10011 HtNZOIC AGIO
20U 4-CRLUROANILiINE
20U 2-HETHYLNAPHTHALENE
100(1 2 4 S-TKlCHLofeoPRtNOL
100U 2-NITROANlHNE
lOOlt 3-NITRPANIHNE
2f>U DintNZfJKIIHAN
lOOU 4-N1TKOAN1L1NE
-------
.lAHpi.c a~d »"Ar.*ais Mj»«ceMe»r system
FPA-rsn-wrG ty
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/8* EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HI8C
DATA HrpOPTINC SHEET
water
SAMPLE NH.I Pf,ri?2«q S^'PLF TY"K! PHOCFSWETL
PROJECT NO.| 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYl MILTON 8TATEI Ft,
STATION l.U.I PW.4,01111,1UA011
STOPET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATe/TIM* 0J/05/B6
SAMPLE COLLECT1 ON I STOP nATE/TTMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED fPOMj
sample pec• di date,/time oo/oo/no rec'd byi
sealedi
CHEMIST! CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MU
CONTRACT LARORATORY(ORGANIC)l
CONTRACT LAHOPATORY(INOBGANIC)|
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
Sample log verified byi tbb data verified ryi chh
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED _ «NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PREStlMPTTVJ EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•R-ACTOAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO be less than VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE,GPEATER_THAN_VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL_wAS ANALYZED FOR B'lT NC
THE
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR Bt'T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
E ESTIMATED minimum quantitation limit.
KEBIIbTS
20UJ
20UJ
NA
40UJ
40UJ
40U.I
160UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U>J
401M
400.T
40 U.I
400 J
40UJ
40U.J
40Ud
4 0 U J
40U.1
40UJ
40Ud
40U.1
40Ud
40(JJ
40UJ
400.1
40UJ
40U.)
40U,J
400 J
4 0 u.J
40U.J
40Ud
4 Olid
40Ud
40Ud
40U.1
4 0 Ud
40UJ
m
40Ud
40UJ
40UJ
40Ud
40U J
40Ud
40U.T
40uJ
160UJ
40UJ
*»»,»l.hl.LVTIC*L HF.fiULiTb,,***
ini ug/ti compound name
N-NlTRnSnUIMETHKLAMlNL
hkn^dIne
PYRIDINE
ETHYLMFTHACHYLATE
paraldehyde
NITHDSnMt.THYLETHYLAMlNE
''LT[1 Y u>-'L.Tn A .»f.. ''LT V. '< r*»¦.
N»NlTHnSOuItTnYLAhlNL
KTHYLMFXHANtSULKONATE
PENTACHLDROETHANE
RENZYLCHL0H1DE
N-NlTH060eYhRULIDXNt
ACFTHPHtNONt
N »NITRnSOMOHPHOLIwE
H-TULUIUlNEHYORUCHLORIOfc
N-NITHnSOUIPIPEHIUINK
1,2.J-TKlCHLORnuENZfcNE
HLNZAijCHLURIDtC
ALPHA, ALPnA-01 MfiTilYbPHENtlHYLAMiNt
2, ft-nlCHLUROPHEKni,
n-PHENYLKNEl>I AMINt
p-php:nylenfl»iamIne
HtXACHLUHUPHOPFNE
1.S-THICHLOHOBENZtNK
HENZUl'RICHLUPIDfc
N.NITpnSO-Dl-N-BUTYLAMINE
RESURCINCIL
m-phenYlenediamine
SAFRHLE
1.2.3.4-TEThACHLOROBENZENE
1.2.3.5-TfcTKACHLOROBENZENt
IBClSAKRULt
l:UM?IMXrCNZE"t
PtNTACHLOKUbKNZtNt
5-NITRn-O-TULUIDINE
2-NAPHTH*LAMINE
1-NAPHTHYLAMInE
2.3.4.6-TtTHACHLOROPHENOL
ZINOPHOS
1,2-oiphenylh*dfazine
TETHAETHYLDlThlQPYROPHOSPHATE
1.3,5-TRINITRUBfcNZENE
PHENACETIN
DIALLATE
D|METhOATE
4-AMIN0bIPHEN*L
PHONAMIDE
PENTACHL0X0N1TRUHENZENE
METHAPYRILENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
AKAMITE
-------
fc*A?,YSlW MANAGE^
F!PA.r3n,REC IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
SAMPLE and MANAGgMcNT SYSTEM
A1
07/17/86 EXTRACTABI.E opgantc analysis# misc
DAT* REPORTING SHEET
WATEP
?£wnt,E Kr.t s?."nrc?3*EMj
continued
PROJECT Nn,| H6-306 PROGRAM ELEMeNTI RCPA
SOURCEl AMERICA* CYANAMID
CITYI MILTUN STATE I »"L
STATION I.p | PW-4,ot 1 1UMOA01 1
oTORET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION. START OATE/TIMr OJ/OS/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION t STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED 8Yj RECE TVEP FRO*l
Sample rec^i datf#/time oo/on/no rec• o byi
SCALED|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHHDi
?5S5Ri!?f,Li^AT88§(§SSS^^?c)?, p IN0RG 8AMpLE N0-« MU
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORgANIC)I
REM ARK | national GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••remarks***
•#•*#••»#••#»*#•»»*•»»»••»*••»»•*•••#••••*•••••«*••*••»*»•»»••»#
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A "
A-AVERACE VALUE
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE
•K-ACTUAL VALUE
•l-actual valui
rs?8
•NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFER
•n-presumpttve evidence of presenc
IS KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
IS KNOWN TO B£ GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED for BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATRO MINIMUM 0(1 ANTTTATTON LIMIT,
MATERIAL
KRSl'LTIi IN I UG/Ii CUMPOUNU NAME
40 U.I £-DXMETHYLAMINOAZUR£N2EDC
SoSj -bmsaitttuwib,,,-- .
40UJ 4#4,-METHlLENE-ei6(5-CHLUHUANILlNt)
40UJ 7,12"DIMETHKLBENZANTHRACENE
N A DlM^HoiyBCNZiniNE
2°U RfcUZYL AI.Cr "
20U 2-MtTriYLPhfc,»UL
20y 4-MfcTHYLPHENOi,
lOOlI BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLOROANlLlNE
20U 2-MtTHYLNAPHTHALENE
inuu 2 4 S-TRICHLohopHtNOL
100U 2-NITROANlLINE
1O0U J-NITHHANlLiNt
20U OlRtNZOrtJMAN
IO0U 4-NiTROANlLlNfc
-------
3««PLE ANO "ANAOKMENT SYSTEM
FP».6sn,BEC IV
aihens uforgu
07/17/86 EXTPACTABLE OBCANTC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA reporting SHEET
WATER
5AMPt'E NT.r fl*ri?2<>0 S^PL'" TIPEJ PR1CESWE'X
PROJECT NO, I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I RC"A
SOUHCEl AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITY I MILTUN STATE I »"L
STATION I,0,| PW-4 "IIPLICATE,Q1112,MQA012
3T0RET STATION NO«
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIMF OJ/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP nATE/TTHT no/00/00
COLLECTED BY I PECETVED FROM|
SAMPLE REC'ni DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D BY I
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.! MU
CONTRACT LABORATORY fORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB PATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMAPKS«*»
***«A»AVEPAGE VALUE «NA»NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-EStSmaTED VALUE • N-PRESUMPTTV*: EVIDENCE or PRESENCE Or MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
JlIaCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE^IVEN
•0-MATERYAL WAS ANALYZED rOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
HFSULTS
iiOUJ
20UJ
NA
40UJ
40U0
40UJ
1 ft ou J
40U.I
40UJ
40UJ
40u J
40UJ
401M
40U.1
40U.)
40UJ
40UJ
4OUO
40UJ
40UiJ
40U
40U<)
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4
-------
S»«PI.P!: I«D H«N«CEHENT SYSTEM
CPA-ran,ncG IV
ATHC"S GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLB ORG»NTC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA reporting sheet
water
*iuorJ» •'?,! osd??0'1 """i : r","CrSi,,El.L
Sontinued'
PROJECT NO,I 86-306 PFOGRM ELEMENTi RCPA
SOUPCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STaTEI El
STATION 1,0,1 PW-4 OUPLIC*T*,»Ol 1 l7>uQk0l2
STURET STATION KOI
SAMPLE COILPXTIONI START DATE/TIME 03/05/86
SAMPL? COLLfCTIONI STOP OATE/TIMir OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY| RECEIVED FROM«
SAMPLE REC'n« DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'n BYI
SEALED t
CHE"ISTI
ANALYTICAL method*
CASE NO.I 1111. ORG SAMPLE NQj D INORG SAMPLE NO,I MU
CONTRACT I.ARORATClRY f ORGANIC") I
CONTRACT LARQRATOPlf J INORGANIC) |
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERITIED BY I TRB DAT* VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REM*RK5«»«
•j£es¥imAtIdV&Al8e «N2pRESuMPTlilEZ|?lOENCE'SrIpSl8EN?SNSr5MATERIAL
:dafe mi n ssgss is n sstSivs?vEN
•6sg,iH9f«TSftsNtS?SS5,B8..SS?T?ViTSSTt?5I^T-D- T" NUM"BR 18
•••••ANALYTICAL Re»UUT8»*«i«
RESULTS IN I UG/I, C0MPUU«U HAHE
4 0U>7 P^niMETHYLAMINOAZUBeN^CML
mi - -
40UJ 4,4'-METHILENt-BlSc5-CHLUHUANlLlNE)
40UJ 7,12-DIMETHiLHENZANTHKACKNE
NA 2-pICQl,INt
N A DImETHOXYBENZJIINE
20U nt'JZYL ALCOHO.
^OU 2-HETHYLPMENOL
20U ~-METHYllPHENQL
lOOU BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLOROANILINE
JOU 2-mETHYLNAPHTHALENE
100U 2 4 5-TRICHLOROPHENUL
loou 2-NITROANILIne
10UU 3-NJTROANILINE
20U D1RENZOFUKAN
100" 4«NITRnANIMNb
-------
SAMPLE <«n ANAI.ySIft MANAGEMENT 5YSTE"
FP».E3n,REG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTA8LE 0RCANTC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING SHEFT
HATCH
5AMPI.F NO. I «?6C 1 ?2Pb 5AMPU T*PF.| LE*-r DFTFC
PROJECT NO.| R6-306 PROGHAM ELE"ENTl RCPA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYl MILTON STaTEI FL
STATION I.D.I LDS-2,01lt8,MOAO|«
STORET STATION MOJ
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START nATE/TTMir 03/06/86
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI STOP DATE/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I PE<*ET VED FPOMI
SEALED DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 PEC'" PYI
CHEMISTI CLP
ANALYTICAL METHODl
lIAi.»S5S,SiMPl'E N0« " INOHC SAMPLE NO.I Ml)
CONTRACT LABORATORYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC) I
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB PA*A VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
••»»*«»•**************•*•*••*••••••*•»••»••••••••«»••»•»•••»»»»•
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE value
•J-ESTIMAfEO _VALUE
•NA»N0T ANALYZED *NAI-IN
•N.PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF P
TERFERENCES
PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
UMBER TS
RFBl'LTS
!iOUd
20UJ
N A
40UJ
40UJ
40Uil
\5P"J
«r"uii
4 0 U J
401M
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40U.)
40U.T
40UJ
40U.J
4OU0
40U.J
40U.T
40U >J
40U.J
40UJ
4 Oil >7
40UJ
40y«i
40UJ
40UJ
400.J
40U*'
40U>'
40UJ
4 OU. J
»0U.»
40U.J
4"U.J
40U.1
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.I
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
401M
40UJ
40UJ
40 J J
160UJ
40U.J
lnt ua/t, cu^pounu name
N-NITkOSnUlMKTHKLAMlNt
ANILINE
BENZIDINE
PYRIDINE
fthylmethacrylaie
PARALDEHYDE
NITROSnMETHYLtTHYLAHlNE
iiiT HY tiMLTn'in''5''LrvATt
N-NITKnsnD!tThYLAMINE
ETHKLmFTHANESULFOnA'IE
PtNTACHLOHOETHANE
BKMiYLCMLORlDE
M-NlTROSnPYHROUDlNE
ACETOPHENUNfc
M-NITKOSOMOKPHOLINE
D-TOLUIUIwEMYUROCWLUHIDE
N-NJTHnSOlilPIPEHIIJINE
> .2.J-TKlCHLOKOdEhZENE
BENZALCHLORIDt
ALPHA. ALPHA-DiMETHYLPHENET«IfLAM1NE
2,6-rUrHMJRUPHENlll,
n-PHENVLFNEpiAMlNE
P-PHEN YLENirDlAMXNt
HEXACHIjUHUPHOPENF
1,3.5-THICHLnROBfcNZfcNt
BENZUTRlCMLUHlDe
N-NXTRoSn-DI-fi-BUTYLAMINE
RESUKCInOL
m-pmenvleneuiamine
SArROLE
1 . 2, 3, 4-TETRACHLC1R0BENZENE
1.2.3,S-TETRACHLUHObENZENt
ISnSAFRULE
1 .2, 4, 5-TETHACHLClK0dEhZENE
1.4-NAPHTHOQUINUNE
pentachlohubenzene
5-NITHO-n-TOLUIOINE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
1-WAPHTHYLAHINE
2,3.4, b-TETKACHLOHOFHENOlj
7. J N0PHO6
1.2-DXPhENYLHJDRAZINE
TETRAETHYLDITHIOPYROPHOSPHATE
1,3,5-TRINIXHOBENZENE
PHENACETIN
HXALLATE
DIMETHOATE
4-AMlNdBIPHENiL
PKONAhIDE
pentachlohoniirobenzene
MtTHAP YRHiENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
-------
SAMp[,|r amr ANALY5I* MANAGEMENT SY6TE*
tp*.ranrRrc iv
ATHENS CroPGIA
07/17/86 eXTRACTABl'E ORGANTC ANALYSIS# MT6C
DATA rfportimg SHEET
WATEP
un « cf^rt >¦ "yrr: iiTTTC
Cont Inueo ~ "
PROJECT NO.I 06-306 PHOGHAM ELEMENT! RC"A
Sourcei am£rican cyanamid
cityi miltun statei fx
STATION I.O.J LDS-2.Q1118,MOA01«
STORET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATfc/TIMr 03/06/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTinm STOP DATE/TIm? 00/00/00
SOLLECTED BY» RECEIVED FRO*l
AMPLE REC'Dl DATE#/TlMe 00/01/00 REC'O B*l
SEALED!
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL WETHOOl
££S!L?9*^ UJU...059,8&K?l,r t»0« p INORG SAMPLE No.I mi)
contract LABORATORY(ORGANTC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC1I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMAR"I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TB« DATA VFRiriED BY! CHH
•#«REMaRKS»#«
•••FOOTNOTES#**
-SiSS«Bi?fov9kSfiE .;:«ES5»{?!!(Jzl5,DE»c*S*5;,;ilSEg!rSf%„IRI,L
~K-ACTWAl* VALUE IR KNOWN TO BE LFS8 THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual value IS KNOWN TO BE greater THAN VALUE GIVEN
^-MATERIAL was ANALYZED FOR but NOT DETECTED, the NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED minimum QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»»•••*N »UYT 1 C»L.
HFSULT8 IN t UG/L COMPOUND NAME
40U.1 P>nlMETHYLAMINOAZUHfe,NZENt
xm wrafiswttsiwxowf---
40UJ 4,4«-METHYLENE-BISC3-CHLUHU
40UJ 1, la-DIMETHKLBEKZANTHRACtHl.
NA j-PICgiINt
NA DlMETHnXYBENZIDlNE
j 0 Oil N RROMACIli
20JN C2 ALKYLBtNfcKNEbtlLNJNAMlOt
20u>) 4 IINIUENTiriCU COMPOUNDS
20U BENZYL ALCOHOL
Sou 2-METHYLPHENOL
Sou 4-METMYLPHEN0l
loou BENZOIC ACID
JOU 4«CHbO*0ANILINE
20U 2-MtTHYLNAPHTHALEhE
lOon 2 4 5-TKICHLOHOPHfcNUL
100U 2-NITROANILINE
lOOU 3-NlTHOANlLlNt
}0U OIBENZOKURAN
100U 4-nITHOANILINE
OKUANILINt)
-------
fiA^PlK And ANALYSIS "ANAGK^ENT SY6Tfc.»
FPA^rS^fREG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, WI5C
DATA RFPflRTIN(J 6HEET
watep
e h »*r% » tr
NO 9 t «6CP213 SMPLf T YPF l WATfcR
PROJECT ND,| B6-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYl Mil,TON STATE! FL
STATION X.D.I SI-1,01119,MOA019
STORET STATION nui
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME nj/06/«6
sample collectioni stop date/timf no/oo/oo
S9i
-------
SAXPI.K «NO AMAI.Vnin >«»»I»CE»1ENT SVSTE"
rp».rsnt*EO iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/86 FXTRACTABLE URGANTC ANALYSIS. MISC
DATA REPORTING SHEFT
WATER
Sample fjn i flhcnzis 5A:r;,r r;
CnNTINUFD
PROJECT NO, I 86-306 PPUGPAM ET.fMjrNTI PCPA
SOUPCEI AMERICAN CYANAMId
CITYi MILTON STATF.I FL
STATION l.D.I 8T-I,01115,M(jA0!5
STORET STATION NOI
tJSEJ'E START DATE/TTMF 03/06/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIM*" 00/00/00
COLLECTED 0V| RECEIVED FROHj
SAMPLE REC'Dl 0»TE,/TTMF 00/00/00 REC'D PYI
SEALED!
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D
CONTRACT LABORATORY?0»GANTC1I
CONTRACT LAPOPATORYflNURGANTC)I
REMARKf NATIONAL GROl'NDWATEP PUPVFY
REM ARK |
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB DATA VERIFIED BYl CHH
•••REMARKS#**
INORG SAMPLE NO.I Ml)
•»•»»•»«••»•»»»*•»•••»»••••••»•*•••••*«»»*»••••••»••»••»»•~»•••#
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-ESTlMATED VALUE
•NA«NCJT ANALYZED *NAI"1NTERFER£NCE6
•N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
KNOWN TO BK ilr»S THAN VALUE --H-- 6 u
~~ E GREAT-" "
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO Bg i|r»S THAN VALUE GIVFN
•L-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE ClVEN
•U-MATEKIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMB
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
NUMBER IS
• •..•kNkLTTIOlj Kt'.SUbTS.K..
RFSULTS 1N| UG/L CGHPUUND NAMK
40UJ P-niMEThYLAhlhOAZUBtMlCHt
\m sw!8wswwis«XDi«--'-
40UJ 4,4'-METHnENt-BIS(2-CHLUHUANlLlNt)
40UiJ 7> 12-DIMCTHKLBCNZANTHRACENE
NA 2-PlCCJLlNl
NA niMETKilXYBENZIDlNt
:n: RlNZYL alcohol
20U 2-METHYLPHKNUL
4-METHYLPHENflL
BENZOIC ACID
20U
loon
2PU 4-CHLOROANIblNE
50U 2-MtTHYLNAPHTHALENE
100U 2 4 5-THICHLOHOpHENUL
100U 2-NIThOANILINE
100" J-NlTKOANlLlNt
20U DIRENZOfUKAN
10011 4-NITRnANiLINt
-------
SAMPT.t AMD ANAT.Y3I* MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
FPA-RSn,PEC IV
A THFNS G'onCIA
07/17/0* EXTRACTABLE ORGANTC ANALYSIS, MlSC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
1fn: r J p.'.r; ?2R3 Sl^-PLr TYPE! "U.
PROJECT NO,I 86-106 PROGRAM ELEMENTI RCRA
SOUBCEl AMERICAN C¥ANAMID
CITYl MILTON STATE I *L
STATION 1.0,1 HW.5,011 04,*QA0O4
STORET STATION NUI
SAMPLE COLLECTION I AT APT riATE/TJME 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLFC TION I STOP nATE/TJMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED 8Y| REOETVEO FROM|
SAMPLE REC'Ol DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D PYl
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CLP
ANALYTICAL M
INOPG SAMPLE NO.I MU
METHOD t
CASE no.I till ORG SAMPLE N0| D
CONTRACT LARORATOPY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORYCINORGANIC)I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKl
6AHPLE "LOG VERiriCD BY I Tftft T>Atfc VERIFIED Bt t CHM
•••remarks***
•••FOOTNOTUS*••
.::S5S85,S;!!!5Il5:o«»;8*{;I!5?SEg?r8fs«ATERi,L
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
#^r?i?iftkT5S\?8?yK8i.5S?t?^Tg8TL?l5??rED- THE NUMBER 15
WE6"LT6
20UJ
Kuo
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
lfiOl'.)
4dUJ
40U.J
40U0
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40U J
40U.J
40UJ
40 Uv)
40U J
40U.5
40U.J
40UJ
40U<>
40U.)
401KJ
40UJ
40U.1
40U J
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.'
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
160UJ
40UJ
1N| UG/U COMfOUNU name
N-NITHnSOCIMt5TH*LA«INt
PYRIDINE
EmLMETHACKYUIE
PARALDEHYDE
NITHDSnMETmfLETHYLAMINE
M£TnYL«fc.Tn«iir dulFukkH
N"NITR560UlH.THlU*MlNh
ETH YLMETH ANKSULFON Al'E
pentachlohdethane
PEWZYLCHLURIDfc
N-NITROSOl'YHRlDXNE
ACETOpHtNUNE
N-NITRDSC
JOMOgPHOLINE
O-TOLUIUINEHYUHUCHLUHlDl
N-NlTROSOl) JPIPEHIUINE
1,2,3»TKIC HLOHOBENtENE
RENiALCHLOBlDfc
ALPHA. ALPHA»DiMETHYLPHENE'tHYLAMiMt
2»6-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
0-phenylenediamine
P-PHENYLENEUIAM1NE
HEXACHLURUPHUPENE
1 , 3,5-TKICHL'lHObENZKNE
BENZOTRICHLORIOE
N-NITKO-nX-N-B"TYLAMINE
RESlJRClNOL
M-PhENYLEWEDIAMINE
SAEHObE
1,a,3,4-TETRACHL0R0BENZENE
1.2.3.5-TtTRACHLUKOBEwZElE
I5riSAKPOLt
1 « 2 * 4 .S»TETKACHLOHOBENZENE
1,4-NAPHTHOQUINONE
PENTACHLOHOBENZENg
5-NlTRO-O-TOliUIUXNE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
1-NAPHTHYLAhINE
2.3.4.6-TETHACHLOHOfHENUL
ZINOPHHS
1,2-OIPHENYLHYDHAZInE
tetraethyldithiopxrophosphate
1.3,S-TKINITKOBEMZENE
PHF.NACETIN
niALLATE
niMETHOATE
4-AMINOBIPHENYL
PRONAMIDE
PENTACHLOHONITROBENZENE
METHAPYFILENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
ARAMlTE
-------
SAMPLE *~0 ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SISTE"
rPA-csrij "EG IV
ATMrNS GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTPACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSI8, HI8C
data reporting sheet
water
r.i 'or i * if typm "o .<-
CONTINUED
Project no.i B6-306 program ei.e^enti rcra
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMlD
CITY I MILTON STATet Tl
STATION I.D.I MW-5,01104,"OA0n«
8TORET STATION NO I
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIM'! 03/04/H6
SAMPLr COLLFCTIONI STOP DATK/TI""! OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY| PECETVFD FROMi
SAMPLE REC'nt DAtE,/tTME OO/OO/ftO REC'D BYI
SEALED I
CHEMISTt
ANALYTICAL "ETHOOl
CASE NO.I 1111 OPG SAMPLE NO| D INOPG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LAROPATfJRY(ORr.ANIC) I
CONTRACT LAHOfiATORY (IMORGANlC1 I
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VEPiriED BY I TRH DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NQT ANALYZED *NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE «n•PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ArlUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO HE LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
*L-aCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B«T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
• ••»»ANM,Y'lIC*L BF.St)Utb»»««»
H^Sl'LTS XN| UG/Ii CUHfr-UUNU NAME
40UJ P«ni^tTHYLAHlNOAZofte.HlCht
ra w:8?aEiWtti«io»i- . -
4QUJ 4,4«-METHYLENE-BI3t5-CmiUKUANlLlNt)
40U.1 7, 12-OIMEIHKLbESZANtHRACENt
N A 2-PICOLINfc;
NA DIMETHOXYBEnZIDIN1'
i'o AL.C n... i(
20U VI-MtTHYliPhENl'L
20U 4«MfcTH¥bPHENOL
100*1 BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLUR0ANJUINE
20U 2-MtTHYLNAPHTHALENE
1001' 2 4 5-THl
-------
SAMPLE and ANAI.ySI* MANAGEMENT system
EPA»Ffln.PEG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/06 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HISC
data REPORTING SHEET
MATE"
fl * m p tj f fin,! fl6n?2«0 5RMPLF TYPE I
PROJECT NO. | 86-306 PROGRAM EI.EMENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANA"lD
CITY I MILTON STaTEI FL,
STATION I.D.I MW.13,01 l21,MQAf>21
STORET STATION noi
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATe/TIMF 0J/03/R6
SAMPLE CObLFCTIDNI STOP OATE/TIMF OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY | PECETVED FROM I
SAMPLE PEC 1n| DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D PYl
SEALED|
CHEMIST I CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.l tilt ORG SAMPLE NOi n INORG SAMPLE NPl.i MD
CONTRACT LARORATOPY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LA«ORATORY(INORGANIC!I
REMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMfcRK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TBB n*T* VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAl, VALUE TS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»0-MATERJAL wAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DFTCCTEn, THE NUMBUR 18
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
RESULTS
JOU.J
s2UJ
40UJ
4UUJ
~oyj
160UJ
1
40U.1
\m
40U.1
40UJ
40UJ
40U.1
40U.J
4011J
«
40UJ
40U''
40UJ
40 U.J
40U>.'
40UJ
40UJ
401M
40U.1
400 J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4PUJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.1
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4O0J
40 U.I
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U J
40MJ
ifeOUJ
40UJ
• kFSULT8»....
INI UQ/l. COMPOUND NAME
N-SlTROtiOUIHCTHtljAHlNfc
: ~ •
PYRIDINE
ethylmethacrylate
paraldehyde
NjTftOSOMET HYI'EtHYLAMINE
N-NlTHnSOUltTHYLAMINE
ETHYLHEIHANtSULFUNATE
pentachlohoethane
RENZYLCHLUPinE
N-NITHOSOpYRROLlDlNt
ACr.ToPHENONE
N-N1TKOSOMOHPHOLINE
(J«TULU IDINEHYDRUC lILUHl DE
N-NlTROSODIfll'EHIDIWE
> t'l3-TRlCHbOHOBENZfcNt
neNZALCHLORIDE
ALPHA, ALPHA«P1M£THYLPHEft&THYLAM1N£
2,6-OlCMLOROPHENQL
0-PHENYLENEDIAMINt
P-PHENYLENEUlAMtNE
HfcXACHLUROPHOPENE
1 ,3#i-T8ICHbU80bENZ£HK
RfcNZOTRICHLORIUE
N-NITP080-DI-N-BUTYLiAMINB
RESURCINOL
M-PHENYLENEDlAMINfc
SAFROLE
1.2.3.4-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1.2.3.5-TETHACHLOHOBENZENE
ISDSAfRULt
1 ,2,4a 5»Tt-TRACHLOgOBKNZENt
l,4"NAPHTHO0UIN0NE
PENTACHLOKOBENZENE
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDHiE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
1-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2.3,4, 6-TtTKACHL0K0t>HEN0b
ZXNOPriOS
1 f2-D1PHENYLHKD8AZINE
tetraethyldIthiopxrophosphate
1,3,3-THINITROBENZENE
PHENACETIN
diallate
dimethoate
4-AMINOBIPHENYL
PRPNAMIDE
pentachloronitrohenzene
METHAPYRILENE
cyclophosphamide
aramite
-------
SAMPLE AMD ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CPA-PS"."EG IV
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/96 EXTRACTAB^E MISC
WATER '
san"pt,e "jn. t Rt»rp2*o smplt. ty";.: "0m*!.
CONTINUED
PROJECT NO.l 86-306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTj RCPA
SOURCE; AMERICAN CVANAMXD
CITY! MILTON STATEl FL
STATION I.D.I MW-13 01121,M0A021
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TTMF O3/03/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY! BEfETVEO FROMi
SAMPLE REC'D! DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D MY!
SEALED!
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOOl
CASE NO.l 1111 ORG SAMPLE MQl D INORG SA"PLE NO.l MD
CONTRACT LABORATORYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! T*B DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NQT ANALYZED *NAI-INXERFERENCES
#j-estimated Value •n-presumpttvf evidence of presence of material
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LF83 THAN VALUE GIVFN
•L-ACTUAL Value IS KNOWN TO b£ GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B'JT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM OilANTITATTON LIMIT.
• »«»«ANfci.YT ICKIj HCaULT6*«*tt«
HF8ULT& IN| UG/b COMPOUND NAME
40U»J P»r>XMETHYb AMINO AZUBtNZCHt
« CTTOWvaiSwMiw---—----
4 0UJ 4,4 «-METHYLENE-BIS(5-CHLUHUANiHNK)
40UJ 7#12-DIMETHYLbENZANTHRACKNK
NA 2-PICOLlNi;
NA DlMETHOXYbF.NZIOINE
2rt"
2 Ou 2-MtfHYLPHENOL
201) 4-MfcTHYLPHENOL
lOOU 2,4.5-tHICHLOPOPHENOL
20U RtNZYL ALCOHOL
20U 4-CHL0RUANIL1NE
20U PIUENZOEIIHAN
100U 7-METhYLNAPHTHALENE
1 ooll 2-NlTRflANlLINt
lOOU 3-NlTHOANltilNt
VOOM 4-NlTR0ANiI,lNE
-------
BAMPl.E «»D »««l.rsis MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
FP»-rsn,»tc iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/66 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS. MISC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
Nn.j flftri?2«7 ssmplf type« momwl
PPOJECT MO,I A6-306 PROGRAM Er.EMENTi RCPA
SOURCE! AMtPICAN CYANAMId
CITYt MILTON STATUi wl
STATION 1,0.1 01108,MQAOO"
8T0RET STATION N0|
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TTMF 03/03/86
AMPLE COLLECTION! STOP HATE/TIMr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I PECETVED FPOMi
SAMPLE REC'D! DATE,/TIME O0/00/O0 REC'O 8*1
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
INORG SAMPLE NO.t MD
CASE NO.J 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! D
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY?INORGANIC)I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
RKM A R K!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED RY| TUB DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS***
••••••••••*•••••••••••••••••••••••••««•«••••••«•«•••«««««•»•*•*•
•••FOOTNOTES***
:E:SS?Sife SKS IS kSSSK JS Si S5a,M*?,B'SStg}'5!™.
*¥Hg"II??JikTcftSM?K5^5f!:8u;s?i?VfTSSTLS5T^TEO- T"c NUMBEB Ts
ntNii uv. nLiunjLUD
N-NITROSOPYHROHDINE
ACETOPHENONE
N-tJlTKOSnMORPHOLINE
results IN| UG/L COMPOUND name
2000 N-NlTpnSOOlMETHYLAMINE
20UJ , ANILINE
NA benzidine
40UJ PYRIDINE
40UJ ethylmethacbyl*te
40U.T paraldehyde
16 01) J nttrOSomRThYLEThYIMINE
40UJ M£THYL'-;t.Tl.„Ht;6i:LrCNATw
40UJ N.NITHnSnjUTHYbAMIht
4QU>> ethylmethanesuifonaie
4fiu>J PENTACllLOROETHANE
40UJ REN2YLCHL0RXDE
40UJ
40U0
40UJ
40U.1 O-TOLUTDINHYDROCHLORIDE
40U0 N-NITHOSOUIPIfEHlUINE
40UJ 1,2.j-trichlohohenzknk
400J RENzALCnLORXDE
40UJ ALPHA.ALPHA-DIMKTHYLPHENETMYLANINE
40UJ 2,6-DicHLORQPHEMOL
40UJ o-phenylfneuiamine
400 J P-PhENYIiPnEDI AMINb
40U.J HEXACHLOROPKOPENE
40UJ 1,3.5-TKICHLUHObKNZENE
40UJ RfcNZUTR1CHLUR1DE
40UJ N-nItAoSO-DI-N-BIJTYLAHINE
40UJ RK3GRCINOL
40UJ M.PHENYbENEDIAMINE
40UJ tCS^S-TETRACWLOROBEHZENE
400J 1,2»3,5-TETRACHLOHOBENZI!>E
40UJ ISOSAFPOLfc
40UJ 1,2,4.5-TETHACHLOHOBENZENE
400J 1,4-NAPHTHOOUtKONE
40UJ PENTACHLOHOHEmZENE
40UJ 5-NITRO-O-TOLUIUIME
40UJ 2-naphTHXLAMINE
40UJ 1-NAPHtHYLAMINE
4 00J 2,3.4,6«TETRACHL0HnPMENHL
400J 7.1N0PHO6
1,2-D1PHENYLHYDHAZINE
tetraethyldithiopyhophosphate
1.3.S-TRINITROBENZENE
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ 1»J»3-TK1B
40UJ PHENACETIH
40UJ 01 ALLATE
40UJ DIMETHOATE
40UJ 4-AMIN0BIPHENYL
400J PRONAMIUE
400J PENTACHLORONITRUBENZENE
40UJ METHApYRILENE
1A0UJ CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
40UJ ARAMITE
-------
SA Mpr.e A*l> ANALYSIS management system
rPA.Fsn.'CC IV
ATHENS CFOBGIA
67/17/86 EXTRACTAHLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS/ M1BC
RATA REPORTING sheet
WATER
*/?,: RftCl ?2"7 SM^ir typk: "onwi,
continued
PROJECT NO.I A6-306 PROGRAM ET'EMENTt "CPA
SQUPCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATEt FL
STATION I.U.I MW-1B,Qlin«,MOAOO«
STORET STATION MOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START DATE/TIME O3/OS/06
SAMPLE COLLrCTIONI STOP OATE/TIM*" O0/00/O0
COLLECTED BY| PECETVED FROM¦
SAMPLE REC•D| DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D H*i
SEALED |
METHOD!
INORG SAMPLE Nrj.l MU
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL
CASE Nn.l 1111 ORG SAMPLE VOI 0
CONTRACT LAnOPATORYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)t
gEMARKj NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
—•-Si2&¥pftS£DV^2fiE •S2^g85MM5WZg?XDBNcEA4rI?Il?gK?j[NgPHATER,*L
Sfi:M|8S£ ?S68i tt SS8SB ¥8 Si SSgWH^HM'SSLSI'SS^N
#^riI??5kTgS8M?K?W5K8nS:8?T?y?TSSTL?5!?rEr- THE 8u5"« 18
• ««•* Art A LYTIC »l<
IN| UG/t CuWfc*OOT4U NAME
P->r> 1«£THYb AM INu A&UAfcN Z.R Nfc
SW:85SSHKJSlM»ii.r
4,4'-METHl(LtNE-bI5(2-CHLUHUANIbINt)
7,12-UIMETHILBENtANIHHACtNt
2-PICOLINfc
OIMtTHOXYBENZlDlNt
Bfc'.'ZYL ATXCHUJ.
2-MfcTrtYLPHENlU,
4-1ETHYIPHEN0L
BENZOIC ACID
4-CHL0R0ANJLINE
2-MtTHYLNAPHTHALENE
2 4 5-TKICHH)H0fHtNUL
2-nithoaniune
3-NITK0ANIL1NE
nXRtNZOCUMAN
4«N ITKflA N II, 1 NE
-------
sjimp^p: flMu ja mamahftment syste"
KPA-FS".BUG IV
ATHENS Cro»GTA
07/17/86 EXTRACTARLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
RATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
sample nn.i #«ri?iis .'..vCLr tx:v
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTl RCPA
SOURCE I AMfiplCAK CYaNAMId
CITY I MILTON STATE t FL
STATION I.D.I Ml*«24,OI 1 13,MOAOt 3
STORET STATION NOl
5*M5i'E COLLECTION! START PATb/TIMT 03/05/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONI STOP nATE/TTMF <10/00/00
COLLECTED BYf PECKTVEP FROM s
SAMPLE PEC ' 01 DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'ri PY|
SCALED t
CHEHISTI CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NQ| D INORC SAMPLE NO.I M|)
CONTRACT LAWORATO«Y(OPCANIC)I *
CONTHACT LABORATORYtIMORGANIC 5 I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I T«B DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS*#*
*«««••••••*•**•••••#*•••«•***•••••*•••••••*••••»•¦»••«#«»••»»#*»»
•••FOOTNOTES#**
•A-AVEPAGE VALUE
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE
•NArNQT ^NALYZEp.^^NAJ-INjEprER£N£ES
*N-PPEStlMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRbSENC
__ THAN VALUE GIVEN
tE:illaSh WSSS 51 SS85S 58 SI
OF MATERIAL
UMBER IS
tt«*«*ANkbY'[IChL HESULTt>fttt*««
HITS'ILTS
20UJ
20u3
NA
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
160UJ
Jouii
40UO
40U')
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4PU.J
4 0 U J
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40 Ui'
40UJ
40UJ
40U-'
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
IftOUJ
40UJ
compound name
>IMETH*l
-------
SAMPl.c >>H ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
FPA-irsn, peg I*
*thkns CroBCiA
07/17/86 EXTPACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS* HlSC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
water
SAMPLE NO, I ««C1?2«1 5# iPl0/00/00
SOLLECTED 8Y| PEf"Etvf:d rRO^J
AMPLE REC'ni DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 BECO «5f t
SEALED|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTIC
AL METHOD|
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE Nut o INOHG SAMPLE NO. t WD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY fINORG*NJC)t
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERITIEU BY I TUB HATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS**#
••••••••••••***••**••**••*****•••*••••••»•••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES#*#
•jiES?|HATED^ALEE_ *5rPRC2^^ E*^SeI?NCENOESMATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO «E LrsS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZFD FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
nrstiLTS
40UJ
40U J
~ OUJ
40UJ
40UJ
NA
NA
n n 11
Suu
20U
100')
20U
20U
»oou
1O0U
100"
20U
10 Oil
••••••N«LVTICkL HE5HLTS"»««»
i"t ug/l cuhpounu name
P-DIMfcTHYLAMl NOAZUBt-NlEHt.
3, V -OlKETH^LfiEliliriHt ¦ "T
4, ~•-METHYLtNfblSta-CHLOKUANXLlNb)
CTSffiRlfiiiaf
4,4<-METHYLi;NfBl_._
7,12-DIMETHYLHEHZANIHHACtNfc;
2-PICOLINt
DIMtTHnXYbENZIDINE
ir.ciHUL
2-MtTHYLPHKNOL
4-MtTHYLPHENOL
RKN201C ACID
4-CHL0R0ANIL1NE
2-meTHYLNAPHTHALEME
2 4 9«TRICHLOKOt»HtNOL
2»NITROANILINE
3-NlTHOANXMNE
DXRENZOI' IIKAn
4-NlTHOANll,lNt
-------
SAMPLE and AWAt.yni* «»N«CE»t»T SYSTEM
rpn.Fsn.BEr iv
ATHENS CroKGI*
07/17/86 EXTRACTA0LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
data REPORTING sheet
WATfcP
r.„ '!".F NO. I 8(Srt?217 SA^pif TYPFI I EACHATE
PROJECT NO,| B6-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
~ITYl MILTON
CITY I MILTON STATF! FL
STATION 1,0,1 LCS,Q1 lt6,MOA016
STURET STATION NO!
sample collection! start date/timf 03/07/86
Sample collection! stop date/ti^f no/oo/oo
COLLECTED HYI RECEIVED FPOM|
SAMPLE PEC'M DATE,/TIKE 00/00/00 PEC'D Hi!
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CLP
analytical M
INOBf: 8AMHLE NO,! MD
METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! 0
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OPGANTC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVY
REMARK!
sample log verified byi twb data verified ryi chh
•••REMARKS**#
•••FOOTNOTES*** •NA-NOT ANALYZED _ *NAI-INTFPFERENCES
»5-ESTIRaTED VALUE •N-PRFStmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*J
:
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNqWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO PIERRE ATER THAN VALU* GIVEN
H.MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, the Aumrer IS
?Se ESTIMATED MINIMUM OUANTTT»TTON LIMIT.
RFSULTS
20UJ
gouo
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
lfiOUJ
<*0 U.I
40U>I
40U0
40UJ
40UJ
40U>)
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
401K1
40(1 j
40UJ
40U.J
40U J
40UJ
40Ui)
40UJ
40UJ
40UO
40U,J
40UJ
40UJ
401),J
40U.)
40U.J
«0U.1
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40Uil
40UJ
40UJ
40UO
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40uJ
160UJ
40UJ
»«««*ANKLVT1CKL KKSULlbaa***
INI UG/L CQMPOUNU NAME
N-NITHOSODIMCTHYLAMINt
mmu* ——
PYRIDINE
ETHYLMETHACRYLATE
PARALDEHYDE
nitrosomf.thylethylahine
"tTHYL'-'tTKANti'lLFQNAT!':
N-NiTRnM)l> I ETHYL AMINE
ETHYbMETHANESULh ON ATE
PENTACH10R0ETHANE
HENZYLCHLQRIDE
N-NITROSnPYRHULlDINfc
ACRfoPHENUNE
N-NXTROSOMORPHOLINE
(1«T0LU IUINEH YpROCHLOHIDt
N-MITROSODIPlPERIOlNfc
1,2,3-TKICHLORObENZENt
REnLalCHLORIDE
ALPHA.ALPHA'OIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMXNt
2,6«DirHLORUPHEl»OL
n-PHKNYLF.NEDIAMINE
p-phenylenediamine
HEXACHLORUPROPEUE
1,3,5-TRICHLOROBfcNZENE
BENzUTR1CHLQRIDE
N-NITHOSO-DI-N-BUTYLAHINE
RESURCINOL
M-PHENYLENEDIAMINE
SAFHOLE
1 ,2,3,4-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,3,5-TETRACHLOHOBENZfcNE
ISOoAFRULE
1 ,2r4,S-TtTBACHLORObEMZ£Nt
i ,4-nXphthoquinone
PENTACHLOHObENZENE
5-NITKO-O-TOl/UIOIHE
2-NAFHTHYLAMINE
1-nAPHTHYLAMINE
2.3,4,6«TtTHACHLOROPHEN0b
ZINQPHOS
l»2-DIPHE«YLHYDRAZINe
TeTRAETHYLDITHIOPYROPHOSPHATE
1,3,5-TRINITRUBENZENE
PHENACETIN
DIALLATE
DIMETHOATE
4-AM1NOBIPHENYL
PHONAMIDE
PENTACHLORONITHQBENZEnE _
methapyrilene
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
ARAMITE
-------
SA"Plyf- AMD AW*r.YSI« "»»AOE«E«I SVSTEK
rPA-rsn»"EC XV
ATHENS CORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLC ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HISC
DATA REPORTING sheet
water
SAMPLE sr,| R6C17291 SMPir TtPgi T.eAC^ATe
CONTINUED
PROJECT NO.1 86-306 PROGHAM EU^ENTl BCPA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
ClTYl MILTON STATEl H,
STATION I.O.J LCS>Q1116»*4QA016
STORET STATION NUI
Sample collfctioni start oate/timf OJ/07/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTIONi STOP DATE/TIMF <10/00/00
COLLECTED BY I PFOETVFD FROPl
SAMPLE REC»r>| DAtKj/TIME 00/00/^0 REC'D P* 1
SEALED|
XNALYTI^AL METHOOj
CASE NO.I till ORC
Contract laporatory(organi
CASE NO.I 1111 URG SAMPLE NOI P INORG SAMPLE NO. I *l>
Contract laporatory(organiC)i
CONTRACT LAnORATQP*(XNORGANIc)I
REMARKi NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVF*
REMARKi
sample log verififd byi tbb rata verified r*i chh
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•d
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-Nqt ANALYZED •NAI-INTKRFEPENCES
J"ESTIMATED VALUE *N«PRE8UmPTIV* EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS known TO be Lrss than value GIVEN
•l-actual value ts known to b! greater than valoe Ajven
•U-MATERIAL_2AS analyzed for b»t NOT DETECTED. THE number is
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
«»«*«ANkLYTlCftL HCSUbTft»««**
RESULTS IN 1 UG/I, COMPUUNU MAHE
40UJ P-nlMETHYLAMINOAZUBtNlEMB
40UJ CHLOKOBtNllLAJE _ .
40U J 3#J'"DlMETHlLBENZlDINt:
4011J 4,4«-MFTHILt;Nt-Bl8l5-CHLUHUANl.LiNt)
40UJ 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZANtHRACENE
NA 2-P1CUL1NE
NA DlMtTHaXYbENZiDINE
£ " Li
20U 2-MtThYLPhENOL
20U 4-MfcThYLPHENOL
100U BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLURQAN.IblNF
20U 2-METHYLNAPHThALEHE
100" 2 4 S-TKICHLUR0PHtN01'
lOOU 2-N1TROANH1NE
100U 1-NITKOANALINt
20U D1PENZOKUKAN
10OM 4»NITKDANIH""E
-------
SAMPLE AND ANAt'YRin MANJIGBMENt SYSTEM
rpA-PTs^.PCG iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HISC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
MATER
S.i"PtE NR. J f»6rl?20/00/00
COLLECTED 9Y» RECEIVED FROM I
SAMPLE REC'DI DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D P*J
SEALED t
CHEMIsti CLP
ANALYTICAL METHODl
CASE NO, I 1111 ORG SAMPLE N0| D INOHG SAMPLE NO, I Ml)
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY { I NOR (J ANIC ) |
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURV.Y
REMARKl
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB DATA VEPIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••footnotes***
•A-AVERAGE value *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI»INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUF •N-PRESUmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actual VALUE IS KNOWN to re LUSS than value given
•l-actual value is KNOWN to be greater than VALUE GIVEN
• U-MAtERIAL was analyzed .for B»T NOf DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
The estimated mtntmum wianttt»tton limit.
Hf SlILTS
20U.J
i0UJ
MA
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
1 f>0HJ
4CUJ
40U.I
40U.)
40yJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.T
401M
40UJ
40U-J
40U.1
401M
4 0Ul1
40U.J
4QU.1
40UJ
«OU.)
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
4 0IIJ
40U.J
4"UJ
4O0J
40UJ
40U.I
4 Oil J
4OU0
40UJ
40U0
400 J
2S8S
40UJ
4OU1J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
i*0UJ
40U.'
IN I UU/L COMPOUND name
N«NITKOBOD1MEIHY LAMINb
mm** ——
PYRIDINE
ETHYLMETHACRYLATE
PARALDFHYOE
NlTHOSnMETHYLETHYL AmINF.
¦•bTHYLMtTnArtESULfUNATt
N-NITKOSOUItTHYLAUNE
FTHYl/METHANtSUL* UNAl'E
pkntachloroethane
BKNZYLCHLORIDK
N-WITROSOPYHROLIOINE
aceIophenune
N.NITHOSOkORPHOlIfcC
0"Tl)liU T D INEH YURCICHIjUR IPfc
N-NITHOSOUIPIPERIDINE
1 • 2»J"THICHLGHOBENZfcNfc
BLnZALCHLORIDE
ALPHA,ALPHA-DIMtTHYLPHENETHYLAMlNt
2#6-0iCHL0R0PHEN0L
O-PHKBYLeNEDlAMINt
P-PHENYLENEUIaMInE
HEXACHLURUPHUPENE
1,3,5-TRICHLOHOBENZfc.NE
ii)i3"ir anuupuE
KENZOl'RiCHLORIDE
N-NITR050»DX"fi"b
RE30RCTN0L
M-PHENYLFNEDIAMINE
SAFROLE
bUTYliAMINE
1 ,7, 3, 4-T£TRACHLOROBE>iZENE
1 ,2, 3. 5-TETHACHLOHObENZh.NE
I SOoArPULb
1 ,2, 4, 5-TETHACHLOHOIJENZENh,
1,4-NAPHTHOUUIn0NE
PfcWTACHLOKOBENZENE
5-N1TH0-0-T0LUIDINE
2-NAPHTHYLAM^E
1 -naphthyla^ine
7,3,4,6-TETHACHLOHOPHENOIj
ZInOPHOS
l,3,S-TKINITROBENiENE
PHENACE1IN
DIALLATE ^ _
njMETHOATE
4»AMlN0HIPHENYL
PRnNAMIDE , „
PENT ACHLOKONITROBENZENE
METHAPYRILEKE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
AHAMITE
-------
07/17/86
EXTPACTAHLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS* HISC
data reporting sheet
watep
:amplt sn.t rortpumprlk
continued
PROJECT NO, | R6-306 PROGRAM rT,E«ENT I PC"A
SOU&CEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I miLton STATEt ri
STATION I.U.I PUMP EQUIP PL* I.D5-1 , 011 1 A , «OA022
STOPET STATION NOI
sample collection! start date/time nj/06/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONI STOP PATE/TIMF O0/0O/O0
COLLECTED 8Y| PE^E T VED fROMi
Sample rec'di date»/time oo/on/oo recti ryi
SEALED I
CHEMIST!
'IC
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
INORG SAMPLE NO.I "D
CASE No. | 1U1 ORG SAMPLE Not P
CONTRACT LAROPATORYfORGANlCII
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPV'Y
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFJFD BV| TRB DATA vERITIEn BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
¦.SSaHSMfc'tt!!, .5»SS8!.f??lli(,f«i»r«;S'iF'S!ES!l!SrSf..TE,IM,
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 18 KNOWN TO RE LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•fj-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•yn!5AS§5IftV — S^S .*t'SL'*S5K3 rn« B"f NpT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
HgbULTS INI uc;/r CUKfUUNU NAME.
40UJ P-nl«ETHYL»mi
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
FPA-ESO.REC IV
ATHENS C'onCIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTA8LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA HrpORTIVC SHEET
MATER
SAMPLE NO. J Bfrp2«5 SlrTLT TYPCi
PROJECT NO, I 06-306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTi RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON 8TATEI ?l
STATION 1.0,1 BAILER EQUIP BLANK,01t05,MUAOOS
5T0RET STATION HOI
DATE/TIM* 03/04/86
OATE/TImR 00/00/00
REPETVEO FRO*.
DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'P BY!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIM* 03/04/86
AMPLE collection! STOP " ~ -----
SOLLECTED BYl REPETVEO FROM|
AMPLE REC'm - ' - " "
SCALED|
CHEMIST! CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE N0| D INORG SAMPLE NO.I Mp
contract laboratory(organic)i
CONTRACT LAB ORATOR It (INORGANIC) |
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB T>aTa VKRiriEO BY I CHH
" •••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN to BE L*S8 THAN VALUE GIVEN
:.....
The e
UAL VALUE tS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE StVEN
EglAL "AS ANALYZED TOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
STlMATED Minimum UtlANTTTHTTON LIMIT, *nt " *
RESULTS
2HJ.1
20UJ
NA
40UJ
40UO
40UJ
1*01.1 J
40UJ
401M
40UJ
40Ui'
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
4«UJ
40U.I
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U..1
40U.)
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40U J
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40U.»
40UJ
40Ui1
40UO
40U.1
40UJ
40UJ
¦xm
40U.I
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
4"U.l
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
160UJ
40UJ
IN| UG/b CU"POUNU NAME
N-NlTHflsnU I METHYL AM1NL
mm** -
PYRIDINE
ethylmethachylate
PARALDEHYDE
MTROSnMRTHKLETHYLAHIHC
-EiTriliiMtTrtANESULruNATK
N-NlTHOSUUlETHYLAMINt
ETH5l,MrTHANE8UL(''UNAIE
PENiACHLnROEThANE
RfcNZYLCHLURlUIS
N-NITHOSOPYBROLXDINE
ACETOPHENUNt
n-Rithosomorpholine
n-TOLUIOlNeHYORUCHLUR10t
N»N1TKDSODlPIPEKIDINE
1,2,3-TKICHL0K0bENZENE
BENZAbCHLORIDE
ALPHA,ALPHA-DIMETMYLPHENKTMYLAMiNfc
2,6-DlCHLOROPHENOL
O-PHENYLENfDIAMINE
p-phenylenediamine
HEXACHLUHUPROPEnE
1 • 1,5-TRICMLOKOBENZENE
BENZnTRIC«l'0"#Dt
N-NlTKOSO-Dl-fi-BUTYLAHINE
RESORCINOL
M-PHKNYliENE 01 AMINE
??5WI -TETRACHLORObEriZENE
1,2, J,5-TETHACHLOHOBEft2ENt
ISDSAFROLE
i:2iSjLS5?#Sfir.SS«i8flp,tMip"*- --
PENTACHLOKOHENZENE
5-NXTRO-O-TOLUIOIhE
jpStfWIMMiSR-
2,3,4, 6.TETHACHL0K0PHENUI,
9 i unounc
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
TEtRAeTHYLBITHIOPYROPWTSPHATR
1,3,5-TRINIIROBENZENE
PHENACETIN
oiallate
oimethoate
4-aMINOBIPHENYL
0H0NITR0BEN2ENE
ILENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
AKAMITE
-------
SA«pr.e ano ANAf.ysin "anagemcnt syste"
rPA-Efln."EG IV
ATHENS GFO«GIA
&7/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, HI3C
DATA REPORTING sheet
water
,sample NO, | flf,ri?2«5 TYres PL'
CONTINUFD
PROJECT MO,l 86-306 PROGRAM Et.EMENTi RCRA
sourcei American CYANAMID
CITYi MILTON STaTEi ri,
STATION l.D.I BAILER EQUIP RLANK,01105,MQA005
STORET STJlTfOM »'0|
collectioni start rate/time oj/04/86
AMPLE COLLeCTIONI STOP DATE/TIME nfi/OO/OO
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FROMt
SAMPLE REC'Dl DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REf'O R*|
SEALED|
CHEMIST I
ANALYTICAL METHODl
CASE No.J 1111 ORG SAMPLE Nqj p INORG SAMpLE Nn.« MD
Contract laporatory(organjc)i
CONTH*CT LABORATORY fINORGANIC)I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAHPLF LOG VERIFIED BY I TRH DATA VERITIED BYI CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NQT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEri VALUE •N-PRESHmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO PE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, T"E NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LImIt. *
RESULTS IN| UG/L COMPOUND NAME
40UJ P-DlMETHYLiAMINOAZOBENZtMb
*883 S WSSKi5VtSEENziDiMr -
40UJ 4,4'-METHYLKNt-BI6(5-CHLURUANlLiNt)
40UJ 7, U-DIMFlTHILBENZANtHHACENE
NA 2-PICOLlNfc
NA lUMtTHOXYBENZIfMNF
Ri^ZYL ALCOHOL
20U 2-METHYLPHENOL
ilOU 4-MKTMYLiPHENOl
lOOU BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
JOU 2-mETHYLNAPHTHALEnE
lOOU 2 4 5-TRlCHLOROPHENUL
loou S-nitroaCIline
100U 3-NlTHOANXLINt
20U DIRENZOKUKAN
100U «-NlTRf1ANXLlNE
-------
SANPIC INn A»«lr51" MUNUGCEWT BYBTE"
FPJi.f'jn,BEG IV
ATHENA GroPGTA
07/17/86 EXTRACTA8LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA REPORTING sheet
WATER
e¦"n*? v.: f5,ri?238 s»Mi*rr tvfi fi.^blk
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM EMEMENTI RCR*
SOURCE I AMERICAN CXANAMID
CITY I MILTUN STaTEI FL
STATION I.O.I FIELD BLANK,01109.MOA"09
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIMF OJ/05/86
sample collection! stop nate/timf oo/oo/oo
COLLECTED BY| REfETVED FROMf
SAMPLE REC'Ol DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D B*1
SEALED I
CHEMI8TI CLP
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NUl D INORG SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORYfINORGANIC)|
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY» TBB f>ATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
^iS4i|BWlD^gg« .St«SK8U??^ziSiDEN?gAJ?I«i8gg?lMgPMATERiAL
W-CSTJWATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTTVt EVIDENCE OF PRESEN'
rjiiSJiJiJ; jg MS ?8 SI
*¥SSAiSTf2!iTE5s«l3?fe55,!:8trSS?T?"TTKSTL?Ef5^T,i:D- THE Sumbe"
TS
HC6I
-------
SAMPf-F AT> *N ALyfll 5 m * N A G EM F « T SYSTE
FPAmVBn.BEG IV
ATHENS GFOPCIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTARLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
data reporting SHEET
water
CM.p^s- nn j 9fiCt ?2®fl SUMPLC TYPE! FLnbljK,
CONTINUED
PROJECT NO.t 86-JOb PROGRAM ET.EmENT| RCRA
SOURCE I AM£p JC AN CYANAMlD
CITY t MILTUM STATEl el
STATION I.U.I FIELD BI.ANK,01109,MOA009
STQRET STATION NOI
sample collection! start date/time 03/05/R6
SAMPLE COLLECT ION¦ STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY« PECETVED FRO"!
SAMPLE REC'DI DATE,/TIME 00/00/00 RfcC'D P*|
SEALED|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I till. OPG SAMPLE NOl P INOPG SAMPLE NO.I ML)
CONTRACT LAWQRATOPY(ORGA NIC)I
CONTRACT LAHQRATOBY(INORGANICI|
REMARK t RATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
8AMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TBB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
#»«REM»RKS#»«
'•jbEst^Sa^d^valSc .;;Kf.85»jtfW'|?|8;j.cE*5;ISSl!SES?l"g5\,TE»i.L
«t8i If 53BSS ?3 M,,}'WlsJJJM ®*"
•l5ESK?iSi!T?Ss.f«6KtSuIS?,;S?.SS\!5;frE''- "e '¦
HEStlLTS 1N | UG/L COMPOUND NAME
40UJ P-DlHETHYLAMlNOAfcOBfcNZiEAtL
\m SW58!SSfcWiS«ioi«r-----^---
40U.I 4,4'-METHYLENE-Bl8t5-CHLU«UANILlNt)
40UJ 7,la-DIMETHKLBENZANTHRACENt
na j-pIcoline
nA niMETfloXYbENZTOTNE
2pi- ALCn::-\,
20U 2-METHYLPHKNUl,
20U 4-METHYLPHENOb
100U BENZOIC ACID
20U 4-CHLURUAN.ILlNE
20U 2-MeTHYIiNAPHTHALENF.
10QU 2 4 3-TKICHLOHOfHENUb
io5u 5-nitroanilIne
lOO'l J.NXTROANlLINE
20U DIBENJOHIHAN
iOOU 4-mTKnANiLINL
-------
SAMPLE AND AWALY9I5 M^mfiEHENT SYSTEM
RPAvFan.RFG IV
ATHENS GroRGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTMLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, H1SC
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATEB
c • »i n • r
f » THe "
Hf", SVJL,Tb»«»«»
HF.6ULTS
2 nUJ
20UJ
h A
40UJ
40U J
VA
ifiuj
40UJ
40UJ
4000
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U'J
40UJ
400J
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
400J
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
400.1
40U.1
40UJ
400.1
40U J
400J
40UJ
400 J
400J
400 J
40U.1
40UJ
160UJ
400 J
IN | UG/I. COMPOUNU NAME
N-NlTHDBOU I MEYhYLAMJ.nl
mmu : _
PYRIDINE
ETHYLMFTHACHYLATE
nitrosom^IthvlethYLAmine
HKTHYLMtTl.AUESUL'CJfiATL
N-N1TK0S0U1ETMYLAMINE
ETHYLMETHANESOLFONAJE
PENTAChLOROETHANE
BENZyLcHLURIDE
N-ntTROSOPYRROLIDINE
ACETOPHENWNE
N-NITHOSOMORPHOLINE
O.TULUIUTNEHYURgCHLUHlOt
N-NlTROSODIPIPERIDlNE
1 .2,3-TKItHLOHOBENZtNE
BENZALCHLOrIDE
ALPHA,ALPHA-DlMETrtYLPHENKTMYLAMlNfc
?,6-D1CHLUR0PHEWOL
0-phenyleneoia»une
P-PHENYLENCOIAMINE
HEXACHLUPOPHUl»ENE
1 / 3,3-TKICHLOHObENZfcNfc
aENZUTRlChLUHlDE
N"NItro8o»dI"B"Butylamine
RESOBCJNOL
M-PHENYLENEDIAMINE
•TbTRACHLOROBEriZENE
1#2«3,5-TfcTKACHLOROBENZENE
ISOSAFROLE
PENTACHLOHOBENZbNE
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDINE
2-NAPHTHYLAM1NE
1-naphthylamiwe
2, 3,4.6-TtTRACHLOKOPHENUL
7.IN0PHOS
i,2-diphenylh*drazine
TETRAETHYLDITNIOPYRQPHOBPHATC
1•3•5*THINITROBENZENE
PHENACETIN
DIALLATE
DIMETHOATE
4-AMINOBlPHfcNYL
PRONAMIUE
PENTACHLOHONITROBENZENE
HETHAPYRILENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
ARAMITE
-------
SAMPLE Ann ANAI.Y3I* M A " A GEM CN T SYSTF'M
rPA-trsn, pkg xv
ATHENS CroBGr*
07/17/86 EXTRAHTABLE ORGANTC ANALYSIS, MI8C
OATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
SA'Tl'E M'l.t •'fiCI??0-? S""rTr 'vno. r» "1" y
CfiuTlNUKo ' *" "'
SSS^ISSeJKS;3??,.,.!?"05""
ClTYf MILTON STjTEl fU
HSWS'.WiS/iS!'0
KSfl? S8ibFgf{8!! SfSS* SSSJHS5 H'At'M
CHEMIST!
analytical methooi
SoS?R«cf't.i»ORATOR§COP6«lffc>?* " 1H°*C SAMPtiE "U
CONTRACT tiAPORATOBYt TNORGANICTi
ggHAPK, NATIONAL GROUNOWATEB SUPVFY
HEM ARK|
sample log verified ryi tbb pat* verified byi chh
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•J-EST? SaT?DVVAIjSe •N-PREifiSMPTT^rZe?IDENCE*0r1p5isENCEN0rS»"ATEPIAL
:E:iS58ifc MS8S ?! ESSSS ?S 5! MfWr?»K%sj5I ™
• ••• AN AIjYT IC KL PEBtlLTS«*«««
"I UG/I, COMPOUND MAHC
P-niMtTHYLAMINOAlOHENAENK
5. ^-DT&E$SH$ENZlDlNr —
4f4'¦METHYLENE-Bl8(5»CHLUHUANILIMt5
7» t 2"OIMEIHKLbENZANTH(5 ACtNE
2-PICQLlNt
niMETHOXYBCNZIDINE
^t:NZYL Al,Cnnr
2-METHYLPhEnOl
4-METHYLPHCNOL
BENZOIC ACID
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENF
2 4 5-TKICHLOhOPHENUL
2-VITROANlLINE
3»NlTRflANlLINt
direnzhujnan
4-NITHOANIHNt
-------
SAMPLE * NO ANALVAIA MANAGEMENT SYSTfcM
rpfl-csn.Piic fv
ATHCN/9 CFoRGIA
07/17/86 EXTRACTABLE ORGMTC ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA KKpORTtWG SHEET
WATER
aT* VERIFIED BY I OHM
•••REMARKS*#*
••••••••••••••*••••••*•»••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••fOOTNOTES***
• A-AVEPAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED *N AI•INTERFERENC E8
•J-eStIMATEO VALUE •N-PRES"MPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Or MATERI
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED.FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
HPSi'LTS
aou.i
iiOUJ
NA
40UJ
40UJ
a
4"U.7
40U.J
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
40 U>)
40U.1
40UJ
40U.1
40U.J
40UJ
400.1
4 <> U J
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40U J
40UJ
40UJ
40U.1
40U.1
400 J
40U.J
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.1
40UJ
4<'Uil
40U0
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40UJ
40U.J
40UJ
40U J
40U J
40UJ
160UJ
40UJ
1N| UC/L COMPOUND SAME
N-NlTKObOUlMETHYliAM J.NC
IBfIE
PYRIDINE
ETHYLMETHACRYLATE
paraldehyde
NITHOSOMETHHLTHYLAhJIiE
M£TH Y LM t-T, A NTS" Lf UN ATE
N-NITHnSnuItTHYLAMlNK
ETHYLMETHANfcSULKUNAIt
PENTACHLOHOtTHANE
RENZYLCHLURlUt
N-NiTKOSnPYRROLlOINt
ACETOFHfcNUNfc
N-NITROBOMORPHOLINE
0»TULUIDI"E rtYUROCHLUHIDt
N-NITR060DIPIPERI0INE
1,2,J-TKlCHLdHObENZtNt
BENZALCHLORIOE
ALPHA» ALPHA-DIMEThYLPHENtTMYLAMINt
2,6-dxchluropheRol
O-PHENYLENEDIAMlNt
P-PrtFNYLEnEDlAMIXE
HEXACHLUHUPROPENE
1 , I.S-TRICHLOROBEwZfcNt,
HtNZUTRlCtiLuRlDE
N-NiTKOSO-Dl-fi-eUIYLAMINE
PESURCINOL
M-PHENYLENEDIAMiNE
??5?S?5 -TtTRACHLOROBENZENE
1 J,*i-TtTRACHLHKObENZtNfc
ISOfcAfRULt
1,2,4.5-TETRACHLOHOBKNZENt
1,4-NAPHTHOguiNONE
PENTACHLOROUENZKNt
5-MTKO-O-TULUIDINE
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
t-NAPHTHYLAMINE
2(1,4, 6»TtTKACHLOKOPrttNQLi
ZINOPhOS
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAfclNE
TETRAETHYLDITHIOPYPOPHOSPHATE
1,3,5-TRINITRUBENZENE
PHENACETIN
DIALLATt
DIMETHOATE
4«AMIN0UIPHENYL
pkonamide
PENTACHLORONITRUBLN^ENE
METHAPYRILENE
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
ARAMITE
-------
SAhPLC ANO ANAI.r.lII MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EP»-rsn. >»f:G IV
ATHENS CFURGIA
07/17/86 FXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS, MISC
data reporting sHer.T
water
s»wp? f uri.t Rf>'M?3r'0 8 * unLF TY"m Ml,**"
CONTINUED
PROJECT Nfl.i 86-306 PROGRAM E'.ETNTl PCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN cyanamid
CITYl MILTOtu STATEl *L
tTATION I,0,| TPIP BLANK
TORET STATION HOI
5AMPLF COLbFCTIDNt START DATE/TI ME OJ/07/R6
SAMPLE COLLECTIOni STOP DATE/TIMF no/00/06
COLLECTED BY I PE^ETVED FROMi
SAMPLE REC'Ol D ATf" •/TlME l>0/nn/r>0 REC'P rvi
SEALED|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LARORATORYtORGANlC)!
CONTRACT LAunRATnRt(INORGAMIC)I
REMARKj NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SIJPVF*
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED RY» TUB OAT A VERIFIED PY» CHH
•»*REMARKS»»#
##•«~•»»»»••••~•••••»»•»••#•••••••»••••••••••••••••••••••••»•«»•
•••FOOTNOTES#**
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NQT ANALYZED •NAI-lNTEpFISRENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRE8I1MPTIVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MAT
•k-acTual value is known to re less than value given
~L-ACTtlAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE CHEATER THAN VALUE CIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T not DETECTED, THE NUMBER Is
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
FKSULTS IN | UG/Tj CQM^UUNU hAHE
40UJ P'DXMEITHYLAhlHQAZUBbNZENt
m s?raBBfc¥te»ui«E -
40UJ A,*'-MVTHKliENt-Blb(i-CHLUKOANlLXN£i
40UJ 7,12-DIMETHILbENZANTHHACLNfc
NA 2-PlCOLlNfc
NA OlMtTHflXYBENZlDINE
jnr RfZYL a:.Cp:i'-
2<>U 2-Mfc.THYLPHfc mOl
20U 4-MtTHYLPHENnL
10011 BENZOIC ACID
aOlJ 4-CHLURUANIUlNE
2ou ?-meThYLNAPHTH*LENE
1001) 2 4 b-TKlCHLOROpHKNUL
mo" 2-nitroanIline
100" J-NlTHOANlLINt
20U OIRENZOfURAN
100" 4-NiTROANlLlNt
-------
5#MPLC and ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT system
EPA-rsn.prG iv
ATHENS GrORCtA
07/17/06 PESTICIDES/PCB *S AND OTHFR CHLORINATrD COMPOUNDS
WATgp
sample r«'n.i Hhn?:';;
rvrrj
PROJECT NO-j 86-306 PROGRAM ETE"ENT| RCBA
SOURCE I AFRICAN CYANAMId
CITY I MILTUN STATE I rL
STATION I.D.I MH-19, uiltO.HOAOlO
SIORET StJtIoN NOl
Siuoi'S SnffESSiSS' SIS5T date/time oj/os/Bb
SAMPLF COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME no/oo/oo
SOLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRUHl
AMPLE REC'DI DATE/TIME OO/no/oO OEC'D BY|
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOi 0
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANTC)t
CONTRACT LABnRATDRY(INORCANlC) I
PEMARKl NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK |
SAMPLE LOR VERIFIED BY I TRB
•#«remarks»»»
INflRG SAMPLE NO.I MD
f>ATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
RESULTS
U.05U
0.05U
0.U5U
0.05U
0.05U
0.05U
0.U5U
U. in
0.1"
0.1"
o.ll)
0. 1U
0.1"
0. 1U
0.5"
«l5u
1.0"
O.hll
0.5"
0.5"
1.0*1
0.5"
.0"
0.5"
0. til
• ••FOOTNOTES*** «na-NOT AnALY7ED *MAI-INTERFERITNCES
•Hlfk^L^ys KSSss^g^r^Ss^sKSLgE s$^i5nce
luIftiTEfeiAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT »0T DETECTED, THF NUMBER IS
i: CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES nf TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
"NITS
"U/L
UG/L
"C/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
U(i/L
"G/L
"G/L
"Ci/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/l
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
!!c/"
VA.
epoxide
ilindank)
1 (hiiHhhJ
Cnnpuuhl)
ALURIN
hEPTACHLUR
HEFT ACHLuR
ALPHA-BHC
BE1A-BHC
GAMMA-BHC
UFLTA-bHC
t N U110 u L f A rl
LltLUHIM
4,4'-nyT (P,
4,4,-L)DE (P,
4.4'-nun (p.p1
tNURIN
tNDOSULFAN IX CBtTA)
t"L0S"LFAM SULFATE
CHLDHUANt iThCH. M1X1UHE)
PCb-U«2 (AHUClAk 1Z42J
(ARUCLOH
(ARuClOH
(ARUCLOH
(ARUCLOH
tarucloh
(ARUCLOH
'.P'-DUi
>.P'»
DDE
ou
l\
ii 5
/I
HCb-W54
PCb-1221
PCb-1 2.12
PCb-1248
HCM-libO
FCb-inib
II)*aPh£ne
CWLCIRDtNK /i
ALtHA-CHLOHDtNE /2
BETA ChLQrLENE /2
gamma-chlokdene ri
1-hYDRUXKCHLUHDENK
3RDANK
>CHLQk
GAMMA-CHLOf
TRANS"NONA(
AM-HA-CHLOHDANE
Clb-NONACHLOh
METHu* KCHLOR
tNURIN KETONE
ft
/i
ri
ri
-------
SAMPL.E AND ANALYSIS M a N A C E. M e N t SYSTEM
FP».rsn,Ptc iv
ATHENS C^ORGIA RESULTS
0.05U
. - u.omi
0.05U
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHFR CHLORINATED COMPOUND Q.Q5U
WATER 0,05b
0.05U
U.05U
SA"PlE '••.•TIF. " 7 f" i MnuWlj O.oSl,
U. Ill
y.i"
0, in
u. in
PROJECT NO, | 86-306 PROGRAM EIiEuFNT I PCPA U.1U
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMJd o|ll)
CITY I MILTON STATFJ Ft, 0.1M
STATION 1,0.1 MW-20.Q1102,MO*00? 0!^11
STORET aiATioN NO I lj0U
5iHEPE SsSPPKSIIriN« START DATE/TTMF OJ/03/86 O^bl!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATe/TTMF "O/OO/nO 0*5"
Y * RECEIVED FROMl J^Sl!
SAMPLE REC'DI DATE/TI«E 00/00/00 PEr"n M YI l oil
SCALED t m«
^ AL METHOD «
.CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOi P INORC SAMPLE nrj • mu II
CONTRACT LABORATORY f ORGANIC) I *¦»"*«. or rut m,i u
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
JEMARKI NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SlIPVFY o"5„
REMARK t 0 I lit
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY | TBH rtATA VERIFIER R YI CHH
•••BE"ARKS»»*
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTIC!
•••FOOTNOTES»*«
—-SS=ftX55ft»«:S*VSEu« SSSpKiuftM^toiSgft'ofmEB^Si! material
J8p"guVS8tTBW«?«l!K ?S^eSumBeh is
^o^VaIjU^IS^R^PORTE^^SF^ CHLORDAWE CONSTITUENTS.
2^ CONSTITUENTS UR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHlHHDANE,
COMPOUND
ALUH1N
EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
HETA-BHC
GAHMA-BHC (LINDANE)
Cf.lta-bhc
triuOaUi^ a* I (aLi-ia;
DItLURIN
(F,P'-OUT)
(P # P '-DUE)
(P,P'-DUU)
anMiYiic»L —
UNITS
UG/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l.
UG/L
IIG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG^l,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
4,4'-OUT
4 # 4 1—ODE
4.«•-ODD
ENORIN
ENUOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFaN SULFATE
CHLOHDANt IT bC II ¦ "iXTUKKJ /I
PCb-1242 (ARUCLOH W*2J
•1242
¦1254
¦1221
(ARUCLOH
(ARUCLOh
(ARUCLOH
(AROCLOH
iSSM
li!>4
1221
12J2
1 i4M
1 260 J
1016]
PCH-
HCb«
PCB-12J2
PCb-1240
PCU-1260
FCB-1O16
TOXAPHtNE
CHLOHDKNfc H
A^PHA-CHLOHOtNfc
BETA CHLORLEnE
GAMMA—CHLOHOLNC
I-MYDRQXiCMLOROENK /i
GAMMA-CHtORDANE fi
TRANS-NONACHLOA /2
ALPHA-CHLOHDANfc ri
CIS—NUNACHLDH tl
HE1HUXYCHMJR
ENDRIN KETONE
ri
ti
/1
-------
SAMPLK and »VAT,yfH.S U|NACCuE«T system
KPA-FSn.REG IV
ATHENS GFOBGIA PESULTS
07/17/86 PESTICIDE8/PCB(S ANO OTHER CHLORINATED C0MP0IIN0S
HATE"
sealedi
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL *ETHODI
0. JU
«.1U
0.111
8:115
O.IU
0.1U
sa«pi,k no, i RhrPjaft ?umpu TYm u,r-
0,2"
0.2"
0,211
0.2U
PROJECT NO,J Bb-306 PROGRAM ELEMENTI RCPA 0,211
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANArilU 0,2"
CITY I MILTON STATE • EL 0,2"
1 , 0"
STATinN I.D.I MW.22,OH01,MOAO07 1.0"
STORET STATfON NOI 2!o"
1 . 0"
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME OJ/04/86 1 . OH
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATe/TTMF 00/00/00 1.0"
2 I 0"
COLLECTED BYl RECEIVED FRO"! 1.0"
SAMPLE PEC1DI D*TE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D PYt 2.0"
CASE NO . I 1111 ORG 8AMPLE NO! D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MO --
CONTRACT LAROOATORYf ORGANIC)I *
CONTRACT LABORATORY fINORGANIC)I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY IToU
BEMARKi
SAMPLE LOR VERIFIED WYl TUB r>ATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS«»»
#»#rOOTNOTES»»«
:i:SHtsSfrS*W£«
•K-ACTUAU VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE £e*S THAN VALUE GIVEN
analyzed ^¦Su¥lSStT8ftNT.»feS! Dumber I8
.TWHENINnMVAI-U^lSIR^PORTEors^fc cSLnRnANF*1" *
. CONSTITUENTS OP METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLOROANE.
"NITS
"G/L
UG/L .
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
•' (t f u
UG/b
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
ug/ij
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Ug/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
COMPOUND
Alorin
"M^?A?llk8S EPOXIDE
ALPHA-bHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC
OElTA»oHC
u • l. »»u- A'
uiLlurin
4 » 4 ' »1>DT (PfP'-DUT
4» 4'-DDE (P»P1-DDE
4.4-'-nun CP.P'-DUU
(LlNDANt)
I (mL^-ha)
;rxn
tNUOJJULE A N U CBtTAJ
tNUOSULFAN SULEATt
CHLf)HUA"t ITECM, "IXTOHEJ
PCb-1242 (ARUCLOH 1242]
12b4 j
1221
1232
PCb-1248 (ARUCLOH 124H
/1
PCB-12b4 (ARUCLOH
pcb-1221 (ahc:loh
PCB-12J2 (AROClOH
PCb-1248 (ARUCLOH
PCH-12tiO (ARUCLOH
PCB»i0t 6 (AHOClDH
T^XAPHENfc
UbUj
1 <-> 1 •» J
CHLORPtNt /2
ALtHA-CHLORIIKNt /J
bETA CHLdRDKNE /2
GAHMA-CMLOhDtNt /i
1«HYDROX YCHLURpENE
gamma.chlokdanE /2
TRANS-hONACHLOK /2
Al^HA»CHLOHDANt /i
CI6-N0mACHL0H tl
MKlHUXICHliOR
tNDRIN KETONfc
ri
-------
SAMPLE *vrj A*-Ar.YfflA ^ANAGKMtNT STSTtM
rp».rs".»ro iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB • S AHU OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUND
WATER
SAMPLE NO,| Rbr 1 ?2<"J .'ft'TIl T , ( r i
PROJECT NO.I 86-106 PROGRAM C»t«ENTI PCRA
SaURCEl AMERICA" CYANAMID
CITY! MILTON STATU rt
STATION 1,0.1 pw-4,01i11,«0*0)1
8T0RET STATION NOl
SAMPLE rOLLKCTIONl START DATK/TIM E 1J/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION I STOP HATt/TI *F "0/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRO"I
sample rec^di date/ti mk oo/oo/on ntrin ry»
SEALED I
CHEMIST! chh
ANALYTICAL method I
SASE NO.| till ORG SAMPLE NO| D INOHG SAMPLE NO.I MU
ONTHACT LABORATOHY f organic ) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED PYl TRB DATA VERIEIEO BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•K-ACTOAL value 13 KNOWN TO BE T.ESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U"MATERIAL MAS ANALYSEn FOR RUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER I*
THE MINIMUM OHANTIT ATION LIMIT,
1. whkB ho value IS REPORTED, SPfc CHLORRANE CONSTITUENTS.
2 J CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLOHnANE.
'NlTR
'Ci/L
l(i/L
l'C/L
IG/L
G/L
Q/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
0/1
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
O / L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
'G/L
IG/L
¦G/l,
"G/L
IG/L
!«!;
CflMWUUHO
At,DP X N
RSWEMAS-
ALPHA-BHC
BET A-HHC
GAMMA«bHC
LiELTA-bHC
tMUDbUbFAN
UTtl,URlN
4,4'-OUT
4.4' -ni)K
~,4'-nuo
tNURIN
EPOXIDE
UiHDANfc)
I I« ij k* h A 1
(P,P'-UUT)
IP.P'-DUfcj
(p.f'-nuu)
tNbOSULr AN
jLfan
, II IHtTA)
K.NUOSULFAN SULfATa.
CHLOHOANL (TfcCH. MIATUhEJ
PCH-1242 t ARUCLOK 1242)
HCb-Ui* (AHUCL"h 1254
pCh-i551 (apuClOh u5j
/1
PCB-12J2
HCo-124#
(AHUCLOH 12J2)
(AHUCLOK 124M1
pCB-litiO (AHUCLOh
PCd-1016 CAMUClOM JUlh)
I'lAAfr-HENE
CHLDHUtNt /2
ALfHA-CHLUHOfcNfc /i
BElA CmLOROEwE /2
GAMMA-CHLUHDfcNE /2
J-HYURUXYCHLOPOENt /2
(,AhMA-CHL')KDANt /*
IHAN&-NONACHLOH /2
Al,HHA-CHLOHPANt /2
CIS-NOnACHLOR /*
IHEIHUXYCmGUR
E.NUR 1 N KtTUNC
-------
SAMpf.K AND ANAt.YAT* SYSTEM
KPA-rsn.RrG IV
ATHENS GropGTA RbRULTS
Q.05U
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUND
W*TEP 0.05U
0.05U
U.05U
f «.ipi r .'n t •i/.iiioq SA>'PIK TYPr» PRl.1" ESWFL' U.UMl
0 J,,
0.111
y.Iu
o,iu
PROJECT no.| 86-306 PB()CR»M f?T,EMENT I RCPA 0.1U
jfOUPCN AHftplCAN CYANAMID 0.}"
CITY I MILTON ST ATE l ri, o.tu
0.5U
STATION 1,0.1 PH-4 DUPLICATE,01 U?,"OA012 O.bU
BTOBET STATION NOI I,OH
O.bU
SAMPLE COLLECTIONl START PATE/TIME OJ/05/Ub O.bU
SAMPLF COLLECTION! STOP nATE/TIMF rtO/OO/OO 0.5"
1 ,0U
COLLECTED BY | RECEIVED EPO>M 0.5U
SAMPLE PEC 'n | DATE/TIME Od/OO/on PECO BVl l.UU
SEALED| ml
CHEMIST! CHH ZZ
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NQj p INORC SAMPLE NO.l MO
CONTRACT LAPOPATORYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABOPATORYfINORGANIC)I --
REMARK! NATIONAL GHOUNDWaTEP SURVEY oTbU
SImahki o;jh
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I Tt»B DATA VERIFIED RY I CHH
•»»REMAPKS»»»
•••FOOTNOTES***
:3:fS5SKrES'!)K[re HhTenitL
•K»ACTUAb VALUE IS KNOWN TO be LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•u-mXterial was analyzed top rut not detected, the number is
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
1. when no value is reported, s*fi chlordane constituents.
2. CONSTITUENTS OP METABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHLOHDANE.
(P',P'-DQE)
1tLUR 1N
H(i/L 4 # 4 ' "DOT (P,P'-DUTJ
"G/L 4»4' "DDE
UG/L 4•4'»DUD
UG/L tNDRIN
UG/L tNUOSULrAN II (RETA}
UG/L ENU08ULf"AN SULFATE
HG/L CHLOHUANt ITlCh. M1X1UHE)
UG/L PCb-1242 (ARUCLOK
UG/L PCb-12b4 (ARUCLOH Ub«J
UG/L PCb-1221 (ARUCLOH 1221;
UG/L PCb-l2J2 (ARUCLOH 1232
UG/L PCb-1248 (ARUCLOH 124*
UG/L PC»-12«>0 (ARUCLOH 1260,
UG/L PCB-1016 (ARUCLOH 1016
IIU/I, TUX ApHfcNIL
nt/i, CHLOhntNE /2
I'G/L AI.PHA-CHLOROtNL /2
IJC/L BET A CHLQRDENE fl
"G/L UAMMA-CHLOROtNt /2
UC/L 1»HYDP0XYCHLUHDENE /2
UG/L GAM"A-CHLOHDANt /4
UG/L TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
UG/L ALPHA-CHLUHOANIl /2
UG/L CI6-N0NACHL0H H
UG/L METHUXYCHLUR
IIG/L ENDP1N KETONE
/ 1
-------
I
SA MPlf: and ANAT,y«Ifl MANACCMKNl SYSTEM
FPA.F3n,PEG IV
ATHRMs GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND oTHFR CHLORINATED CnMPOUNDS
WATER
SAMPLE in. J flsPl?2<>7 SAMPLE TYP/j LC A T *
PROJECT NO, I B6-J06 PROGRAM ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CVaNAMIO
CITYl MILTON STUTEI FL
STATION 1,0.1 LCS,01116,MQA016
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLKCTIANI START OATE/TTHr OJ/Q7/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TINE 00/00/00
COLLECTED HYI RECEIVED EPO^I
SAMPLE RtC'DI DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D PYI
SEALED(
CHEMIST! CHH
Analytical methoqi
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D IN0RG SAMPLE Nn.l MO
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANTC) I
CONTRACT LABORAT0RY(IN0RCANIClI
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TUB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
»«»remarks»»»
•••FOOTNOTES***
-»¦ — — . _ . . _ —VlDENCE OF PRRSFnCE OF MATEPt
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN "Ate.fi
• U-MATEPIAL WAS ANALYZED FOP BUT NOT DETECTED. THF NUMBFR Ifl
¦PUB* y T H T miu iiniuVTi'iipTnM f rUTT • ' ' U DL" AO
1
2
"^SrS^nSLWrS^^Efir^ chlorine constituents.
: CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICS CHLnpnAME.
RESULTS
UNITS
0.05U
"G/L
y.osu
. UG/L
0.05U
"G/L
o.osu
UG/L
0.05U
UG/L
O.05U
"G/L
0.05U
IIG'L
0 a v 't u
y / L
O.H'
"G/L
0.1"
"G/L
0.111
"G/L
0. 11'
tIG/L
O.UI
"G/L
0.1"
"G/L
0. Ill
"G/L
0.51'
"G/L
0.511
UG/L
1.0U
"G/L
0.51'
1JG/L
0.5"
"G/L
0.5"
"G/L
1.0"
"G/L
0.5"
UG/L
1 .01)
"G/L
••
"G/L
••
"G/L
m m
"G/L
m *
"g/l
••
"G/L
mm
UG/L
•»
UG/L
¦ •
"G/L
• •
"G/L
2'?"
"G/L
0. ID
"G/L
COMPOUND
AI.DR1N
wmm
aipha-bhc
BUA-BHC
Gam"a-bhc
UF.LTA-BHC
v ¦ ¦,. f n "
UltLUHiN
EPOXIDE
(L1N0ANK)
V «U~ "HJ
IP,P'-DDTJ
(P » P'"DUt)
(p,pi-OUDJ
*,*' -DDT
4,4' -DUE
4.41-DUD
EMURIN
KNDOSULEAN Ii (BETA)
tMUMSULFAN SULfATt
CHLDHDANt ITtCH. *1 Ai'UKE)
PCtt-1242 (ARUCLUh 1242)
pCb-i254 (AHUCLOH 1 ib4 J
PCb-1221 (AROCLOH U21)
PCB-12J2 (ARUCLUH 1232J
PCM-124B (ARUCLOH 12«H)
PCM-120O IAROCLOH WbOJ
PCU-1016 (AHUCirfP iojbj
TOAApHfcNt
C'HLUMDfcNE ft
AI.lJHA-CHLaKDt.Nt
BEIA CHLOROENE
/i
/a
Ci*MM A-C HLOHDtN E
1-HYDHOXICHLURDENC
OAMMA-CHLORDANK ti
TRANS-NONACHLOR /j
Al/PHA-CHLOHOANt /a
CIS-nON AC HLOK tl
METHOXKCHLUR
tNURlN KfcTUNfc
/2
-------
07/17/86 PESTICTDF6/PCH'8 AWD OTHER CHLOHINATFD COMPOUNDS
w*TE»
«n»| Nn## o *. r * ** n ft i
PROJECT NO.| 86-J06 PROGRAM ET.ETN T1 PCRA
50UPCEI AM *PICA N CYANAMID
CI rv I HILTON ST^Tf;i rL
STATIDN 1.0.1 81-1,01 1 15,M0AM5
STURET STATION NOl
SAMPLE COM FPUMl
sample pkchi datf/time on/oo/or Rtr'n h*i
SCALEOI
CHEMTSTl CHP
ANALYTICAL KETHOni
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLF NOl 0 INDRG SAMPLE N0.| HU
CONTRACT LA»ORATOP*(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LAPOPAT()PY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| national ghound*atep supvfy
RICMARKi
SAMPLE LOC. VERIFIED BY | T»H r»»TA VERIFIER n ¥« CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••footnotes***
• A-AVCRaSe VALUE *NA-NQT ANAI.YTED *NAI-lNTfcRFEKENCE8
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE «N-PRESUNPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PREflTNCE OP MATERIAL
:i:tf !SAC5fSS5 ?8p8Su^2§TTSe?Ecv^^ SAS'Sumb*. is
J TwBENINOMVALUFArSIRFPORTEnIMi?t CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS,
7. CONSTITUENTS OP METABOLITES W TECHNICAL CH^OROAME,
~t!*ULTS "NITS COHPUUhU
I'.OSU l'G/L ALOBIN
MlK nS/L Sipxictl^R EPOXIDE" —r
0.05U UG/L ALPHA-BHC
0.05U MO/L BETA-BHC
o.osu iig/l ^amma-bhc (Unoane)
0,050 tlfi/L DCLTA-aHC
O.lif'l nc/l t.NlJDS'JLFAN J (ALPlAJ
0,111 uo /1. UltLUPiN
0.1U UG/L 4,4«-DUT (P,t"»nuT)
0,11) 'IG/L 4,4'-nDF CPtP'-DOEl
O.lll II(//L 4»4'-DUD (P# |f>' •DUD)
0.1U UG/L ENI>R1N
0,10 UG/L tUDOSULFAN II (RETA)
<>,I» UG/L tMUOSULFAN SULFATE
U.bU llG/l, C'HLflkOANt ITtCH, "UAl'UHEJ
U.bU UG/L PCb-1242 (ARuCLOH 1242J
1,011 'IQ/U pCb»l 2S4 (ARUCLOH 1254)
0.5U UG/L PCb-1221 (ARGCLOR 1221)
l). bH UG/L PCb-1 2 J2 (ARUCLOH 1232)
U.S II UG/L PCb-124» URUCLOK 12«H)
1.0U m,/L PCU-1260 (ARUCLUK libOJ
0.50 UG/L PCb-1 (i 16 (AROCLO»< 1U|6)
l.OH UG/L 1 'JA APHfcNfc
UG/L CHLOKDtNt 'i
"C/L Aht>HA~CHLOHOLKk. /J
Uc./i, BETA CHLORDENE /2
I'G/L GAMHA-CHLORDCNt /2
UG/L 1»M YURUX XCHLORUENK /2
UC/L GAMMA-CHL08DANJC fi
I'G/L fRANS-fcOSACHLDR /2
UG/L ALPHA-CHLUKDANfc tt
"U' U wm
UG/L CJ&-NOnACHLOK rt
HK1HOX KCHI/UP
ENDPIN KETONE
-------
«U H^KLIAin -HiKUbr
ITPA-ESn.OKC IV
athkns Georgia
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
water
SA-'PI.r ",i SA«Pf,K TVPEl Mln r,
PROJECT NO.| 86-306 PROGRAM ET,EVENT! PCPA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITYt MTLTfJN ST*TE! ri
STATION 1,0.1 MW-5,01104,MOA004
STORET STATION MO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TI*E OJ/04/R6
SAMPLF COLLECTION| STOP DATE/TTwr 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RerrTVFn eromi
SAMPLE REC'Dl OATE/TIME On/OO/OO BfcX'P P*l
SEALED!
CHEMIST! CHW
ANALYTICAL METHODI
CASE NO.! 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl 0 INOBG SAMPLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORYtOPGANIC) « *
CONTRACT LABORATORYfINORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VER1VIED BY I TBB PAT* VERIFIER B YI CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES*** »NA-NOT ANALY7EB *NAI-INTERFKHENCKS
~A-AVEPAGE VALUE #n«PRkS"MPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE ur MATERIAL
•J-ESTIMATEH VALUE *N-KKtg Sp LES8 THAN VALUp GIVEN
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS £NOWN pgpBguj »,QT DETECTED. tAe NUMBER If
caom.™ c2».s.T,r,s.
^^TI?UfStS o55ME5MlTfes nf TECHNICAL CHLnRDANE.
Compound
ALDMn
mm ™~ -
HEIA-BHC
delta-bh?
1 Ut^"'
tP»f'-noTJ
~ ,4 -ode (P, P »oDOK:>
&«{S
Pci-lL'i^tARSc^h^uiaJ^
{ARUCLnn }*?«)
fc«b:i2J! :g{&>gs hI*j
PCB-1248 JSgygfcSS U*2]
£cElfo?2 J}2w£lu0K
fnS;^iSt'ARuClj0t<
CHLOhDEne /¦)
tllS'fittMsss" ,?
,*T%HA^"l'TAN£ /i
CIS-nOnACHLOn /Z
«ernaxifCHLgR '*
CNOPIU KETONE
li4B J
U60)
1016)
-------
rp»-rsn.prc iv
»THt«5 GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTrCIDFS/PCB'S ANO OTHFR CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
WATER
SA"PiF. in,t flftri?2»o ?VPP:
PROJECT Nn.i 86-3 08 PROGRAM ELEMFNT I RCPA
80UPCEI AMERICA*! CiAHAMtO
CITYl mILTOw STATFt ri
STATION 1,0,1 MW-tJ,oi)21,MOA02t
6TOHCT STAriON NO I
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIMf OJ/03/N6
SAMPLF COLLECT IflN | STOP DATE/TT"F n0/00/nn
COIIFCTFD rtY > PFrETvro F R 0 I
SAMPLF REC'DI UATF/TIME OO/OO/OP RKC ' 0 Hit
SEALED!
CHfcKISTI CHH
ANALYTICAL MKTHDDl
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE HOi D INOPr SAMPLE NO.I Ml)
CONTRACt LAROPATHRYfURGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMAPKl NATTONAt. GROUNDWATER SUPVY
HEMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED MY I T«R DATA VFRIFIF.M RY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
••••#*»»*
»»#•»•••»»•»»•«•»•••••••••••••••••••••••»•»•«•••~•»••••
**i£2»vFRAGF*VALUE •NA-NQT analysed »NAI•TNTERTERENCES
i^Zr«TtMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTTV* EVIDENCE OK PHESENCE OF MATERIAL
•d??$Ih!5 fB-"5";E52TT«?^fV8! „
^«HfNI«nf'vATJUCAISIB1!POBTITiJMSPt CHLOBnANE CONSTITUENTS.
2l CONSTITUENTS 0« METABOLITES nr TECHNICAL CHLORDAME.
ERlllTS
UNITS
0 . 111
U(i/L
O.lt!
O.lll
SiS'/fc
o.iu
UG/L
o;iu
UG/L
0.11)
"G/L
0. 1U
"G/L
"f '
6 2"
ug/l
o.2U
UG/L
0.2H
UG/L
0,2"
UG/L
0. 211
"C/L
0.2"
"G/L
o.2t)
UG/L
1.0"
"C/L
1.0"
"G/L
2.0"
"G/L
1 ,0U
"G/L
1 ,0"
UG/L
1 .0"
"G/L
2.0"
"G/L
1.0"
"G/L
2.OH
"G/L
--
UG/L
— —
"G/L
m m
"O/L
m m
"G/L
mm
UG/L
m m
"G/L
• •
"G/L
— *
"G/L
"G/L
1 ,ou
"G/L
o.2"
UG/L
CtlMPUUHl)
M.DR1N
HEpTA^CI^R EPOXIDt
ALPHA-BHC
BET A-BHC
GAHMA-BHC ILlNDANt)
DF.LTA-BHC
t.Nynsi'LFA" I (Al^NA)
UItLUMIN
4,4'-DuT (PfP'-DDTJ
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-ODfc)
4,4"-nun (p,k»'"DuuJ
t N U RIN
KNOOSUIiFAN II IBfcTflJ
EMOOSULFAh SULFATE
CHLOhOANt ITtCH, M1ATUHK}
PCO-1242 (APUCLOH 1242J
PCB-I2&4 t ARUCLOH 12b4)
PC6-1221 (APOCLOr 1221)
PCe-1232 tARUCLOK 12J2)
PCb« 1248 (ARUCLOH 124111
PCH-1260 (ARUCLOH 12t>0)
PC rt- 1016 ( ARuCliOB 1U16)
I"XAPHtNt
CHLOKDfcNfc (4.
ALPHA-CHLOHOtNt /2
bETA CmLORDCNE /2
GAMMA-CHLOHDt"fc tl
1-HYURUXYCHLUKDEN& fi
gahma-chlukdane ri
THANS-NOnACHLOK /'I
AJ.PHA-CHLdRnANfc /*
Clti-«ON*CHt,nH /*
MriHUXKCMI.UR
E.NDPIN KETONE
-------
<1 "«ll I I" 11' ^HnoiTb'
Epn.ran.otc iv
»thfns cmrgi*
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATE0 COMPOUNDS
WATER
?.A"n,r n",i r„, i?2«t r.i- . ;• -.v. v.
PPUJECT N0.| Rft-JOf) PROCHAm ET,EMENT| RCRA
50UHCEJ ALBICAN C Y ANAM 10
CITYl MILTON 8TATEI r\,
STATION 1,1),I MW-1 M,01 1 Ofl.MQAnofl
STORET STATION MOl
SAMPLE COt'L.f'CTinN I START DATE/TTHF 0J/0S/B6
SAMPLE C0L.LFCTIONI STHP OATF/TIMF no/0n/00
COLLECTED HYI RECEIVED fROM|
SAMPLF REC'IIJ DATF/TIM|t 0ANEJ
LELTA-BHC
LNi)06Ut,FA" I I ALP h*)
UltLDHIN
4,4'-DDT CH,»"-OUXJ
4,4' -DDE (P,l»t-DDE)
4,4"-Ol>n (p,p'«DUU)
ENDP1N
tNDnsULFAN II 1 BETA)
EnDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLHKUANfc (TfcCH. MiAl'l
PCto" I 24 2 (AHUCLOK W4,
r^o-a ««v 1
EMStf !
TOAAFHENt
O.SII
O.i"
PCS"12 5 4 (ARUCLOH
PCb-i221 (APOCLOH
PCB-12J2 (AROCLOH
PCH-1248 (ARUCLOK
" (ARUCLOH
( ARUCLOH
"E
C'HLOKUtNt /2
alpha-chlordene
Beta chlordene
GAHMA-CHLOHnCNb ft
l-HYUROXYCHLURDENC
GAMMA-CHLOHOANb /*
TPANS-fioBACHLOft ri
ALPHA-CHlURDANE ri
C IS-M1N ACHLOK / i.
ME1HUXYCHL0R
ENLRIN KETONE
/ 2
-------
lt»"PLE *"IJ »N»l,y5H MANAGEMENT BtSTf
rp*-r sn.HEG IV
ATHENS GFOPCIA
07/ t7/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
WATER
SA^PT.E fJD. t AA'IPI.F TYHTJ f'PNVL
PROJECT NO. I 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT!
SQUPCEl AMERICAN CY ANAMIP
cityi miltov statfi el
STATION I.D.I MW-2«,01J13.MOA013
STORET STATION nOI
BCf A
SAMPLE COLLECTION«
SAMPLE COLLECTIONt
COLLECTED BY |
SAMPLE BtC'PI D
START DATE/TIME OJ/05/86
STnp oate/ttmp oo/oo/oo
SEALEDl
ATF/TrME OO/OO/OO
PECETVED FRO" I
Rec'n
p * t
CHEMIST! CHH
Analytical methodi
:ASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D
;ONJRAqf LAPOPATOBYfOPGANICJ
llA*
. . .... ^ jABOPATOBY (OPGANIC ) |
:0NTRAeT LABORATORYfINORGANIC)i
_REMARKI NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SUPVEY
REMARKj
INDPG SAMPLE Nn.l MU
SAMPLE LOG VERIEIED HYI
•••REMARKS***
TBB
TATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
Bfc.9ljI.TR
O.OSU
I'M
0.Q5U
O.05U
n ikii
u t u ^ u
O.05U
0.05JJ
J i m ^ u
0,1"
0,111
0. Ill
0.1U
O.iu
0,11)
o; iw
" ,51'
,5i
o
0
1
0
O.su
O.bll
1 lift
.oil
,iU
,bii
bll
0"
.511
.OH
0,5'l
0,111
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERACE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYSED •NAI»JNTEPFERENCES
~ J-ESTIMATEft VALUE — —
•J»ESTIMATEd Value »N-PRESUmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OE MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE *" ~~ ~~
•1I«M aTERII "
THE MNJn w-
1, when no value rs reporter, s*£ chloroahe constituents,
2. CONSTITUENTS or METABOLITES "E TECHNICAL CHlciRPANE.
kL VALUE is KNOWN TO BE JjESS THAN VAtUE GIVEN
UAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT *)0T DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
[NJMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *
units
G/L
ksh: mnmi
(;/
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/l
\j/ .i
UG/L
G/L
C/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
Pt
bt
U G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
G/L
S/'fc
G/L
UG/L
VA
COMPOUND
ALiDR IN
ALPHA-bHC
bEXA-HHC
GAHMA-BHC
DKLTA-BHC
U . ' J U ij A
UltLUHlN
4 r 41-DUT
4,4t-DDE
4,4'-ODD
ENDRIN
EPOXIDE"
^LINDANE)
A. I « U f' ^ J
(k>,P'-DOT
(P# P'"DDE
(P,P'-00"
KN008ULFAN 11 (BLiAJ
ENDnSULFAN SULFATE
CHLOHPANt (TtCrt, M1ATUKE)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOH 12421
n
FCb-12S4
pCB-1221
CCU-1232
PCU-1248
PCtl-1260
HCB-1016
TOAAPHfcNE
CHLOHDCNE f'i
ALPHA-CHLO^DtNE
faFTA CHLORDEhE
(AHOCLOK
(ARQCLOA
( ABGClO*
CARUCLOR
(ARUCLOR
( AROCLOR
1254
1221
12J2
1248 J
1260]
10163
/2
/2
/ 2
GAMMA-CHLOHDENE
l-HYUBOXiCHLUKUENt /2
GAMMA-CHLUROANK /2
TBANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALtHA-CHLORDANt /Z
CIS-NONACHLOM /i
ME'lHUXYCHLUR
ENDRIN KETONE
-------
'LC- d'lU #» r-
rpA.ran.REG iv
ATHr^S C^OPCIA
07/17/86 PfcSTICIDES/PCB' S AND OTHFR CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
W*TC0
smple no,j oftri?2fls
m"Pi ( tvpp: mca" ^¦•:TEr
PROJECT NO.I 86-306 PROGRAM EfEMENTl RCPA
800RCEI AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATE I FL
STATION l.D.I LDS-2,011I8,MQA018
STURET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIHF OJ/06/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TTME OO/OO/OO
collected hv 1 picrcrvro fpo*'i
8AMPLF REC'rij OATE/TI^E OO/OO/OO R EC ' P R Y t
SEALED|
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
:ase no.i
,ONTR»CT LABORATORYfOPGANIC)!
I ACT " " ~ ~
njJ._Q?e.SMPLE_?Ol
CONTRACT LA*0RAT0PY(INORGANIC)|
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK 1
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TBB
•••PfcMAPKS###
INORC SAMPLE NO.! mu
RATA VERIFIED PYl CHH
pesut
O.u
W
S:lu
8:i!
0.21
M'
0*21
0.21
0.2U
y,2f
0.21
}.o-
i.oi
2.01
1.°'
i.Oi
l.Ot
2.01
' .U'
.01
i
TS
4:81!
••~FOOTNOTES•~•
• A-AVEPAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANAM7.ED »Na I"INTERFERENCES
•J-KSTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUmPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE 0? MATEPtAL
•K-jlCTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BF I-ESS THAN VaLUE GIVEN 1 L
•U«SATERIaL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT MOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINJHUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
1, WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLOHDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2, CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORINE,
UNITS
"G/L
UG/L
I'G/L
UG/L
1IG/L
UC/L
nfi/L
•x/..
•IG/L
UG/L
IJG/L
UC/L
DCi/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
UG/L
mg/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
uq/L
UG/L
U«/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
COMPUUND
ALDRIN
tlliiA^BfcHB EPOXIDE" ~~~~
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
OELTA-bHC
£ V-",' I (ALPHA)
UltLUKiN
4, ~'-DDT CP*b>• «DUX J
4,4' -DDE (P,tH-DDC)
4,4'-DUO fp,F'-DUD)
LNDR1N
tNOOSULFAN II (BfcTA)
fcNDOSULFAN sulfate
CHLOHDANt (TfcCH. MiAXUhE)
YCb-1242 (ARUCLOH
C AROCLOH
(ARuClOR
(ARUCLOH
(ARUCLOH
(AHOCLOH
(AROCLOH
PCb-12S4
PCb-1221
PCb-12 3 2
FCb-1248
PCb-UoO
PCb-1016
TOAAPHfcNE
CHLORDbNb /2
ALPHA-CHLUHOtNE /2
Beta chlordeme /2
GAMMA-CHLOHDfcNt /2
1-HYURUXYCHLOROENK
Gamna-chlordane ti
trans-nonachlor /a
ALCHA-CHLURDANE fl
CrS-hONACHLOK fi
eElHUXYCHLUR
NDRIN KETONE
1232]
1248]
Ut>OJ
luib)
/2
-------
3*MPt,r *ND ANALYSIS HANACEMEMt SYS TB«
CP».FSn,BtG IV
ATMRNg CFoncrA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
water
N 0 , < Rt>C1?2"; ,r— ' f •.. ¦ ~. I-
PROJECT NO, I 86-306 PROGRAM Et.E^ENTI PCPA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYaNAMID
CITY! MILTON STATUl rb
STATION J.0,1 FIELD BLANK,01106.MOAO06
STORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLfcTIONI START DATE/TIME OJ/04/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI STOP DATE/TTME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRO* I
SAMPLE PEC 10| DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'P H*|
SEALED |
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MO
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OBGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)t
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK l
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TRB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•»«PEMARKS»«»
•••footnotes*"
#a-avera8f value •"'*"!!2I..*Sftli3(2i:2„.^-;i!6IZlNTER''KRENCE8
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUmPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE CIVgN
•(immaterial was analyzed for but not detected, thf number is
the minimum quantitation limit.
1. when no value is reported, see chlordane CONSTITUENTS.
2! CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHljOHHANE.
• ••••ANALYTICAL, KrSUbTb.K.*
fciSUI.TS
U.05U
0.05U
O.OSU
0.05U
0.05U
o.csu
0.05U
O.uMi
0,1"
0. Ill
U. 1U
0, 1U
0, 111
U. iu
U. Ill
0.b"
ojsi'
1. on
0,b"
u.b"
0.511
1,01'
0.5U
1 loll
0.5U
0. lu
UMTS
"G/L
.UG/L
UC/L
IIG/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/li
"G/L
'IG/L
UG/L
'IG/L
"G/L
ug/L
"fi/L
'IG/L
"C/L
"G/L
"G/L
IIG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
ug/l
"G/L
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
COMPUIJhD
ALDR1N
H^TA^HtuS EPOXIDE -
ALPHA-ttHC
BETA-BHC
CAMMA-BHC ILXNDANt)
UElTA-BHC
hNu'lSULFA!- I IAM"«AJ
UULUH1N
4,4'-nuT (P,P'-DUTJ
4,4'-nuE (p#p«.Doe)
4»4'-DUD (, p • -DbU)
L^OPlN
fcNUOSULFAN 11 IBtTAJ
LNbOSHLFAN SULFATE
CHL()K"ANE (TtCH, MiATUKE)
FCB-1242 (ARUCLOH H42J
PCB-12b * (ARUCLOH Wb4J
PCb-l221 CAROCLOH
FC»-1232 (ARUCLOH
PCB-1248 (AROCLOH
PCb-UfcO (ARUCLOR
PCU-1016 ( AROClOH
TUXAPHtNE
CHLOROtNfc /2
ALPHA-CHfcURDfcNC ti
BETA CHLORDENE ti
(jAmma"CHlohdeni£ n
1"HYDRUX KCilLURliEnE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /i
TRANS-NONACHLnH ti
alpha-chlordane ri
CI6-N0NACML0K ti
mfthoxychlor
tNUPIN ketone
1 O* i
1*21
WJaj
1 <14 H )
libOS
lulb)
-------
«AMPr-K A D ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
rp»«ran,beg iv
ATHEMs GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDFS/PCB'8 AND 0TH*R CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
WATER
SAMPLE NH.j Berlins SAMPLE TYPF: Ht.K^A
PJOJErT NO. I 06-306 PROGRAM ELEMENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMTo
ClTYl MTLTO* STATE!
ilt&l2N.ilS»L,BAiLER C0UIp BIi»NK,OJ105,H(JA0Ob
STORET 8TITION not
SJHSr'E SSPf'ESZI2N * START OATe/TIME 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONt stop DATE/TIMF1 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECETVFD FRl)M|
SAMPLE REC'H DATE/TIME 00/00/00 REC'D "Yl
SEALED|
Chemistt chh
ANALYTICAL METHrJDI
CASE NO.I 11U ORG SAMPLE NO| P INORG SANPI.E Nn.f Ml)
CONTRACT LABORATORt(ORGANIC)I *
CONTRACT LABORATORY?INORGANTC1I
REMARK I national groundwater survey
REMARK|
8AMPLF LOG VERIFIED RY| T*8 DATA VERIFIED BY t CHH
•••REMARKS###
•••FOOTNOTES##*
• A-AVSHAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALX'-EO,,, »NAI-INTERFERENCfcS
•J-FSTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Or MATERIAL
JuImaTEr5(aL*WA§ ANALYZED foRBBU^ENOT DETECTED. TieENUNBER IS
x TWHKNTNSMVALSr*TSIR*PORTEDjM8?| CSt2R?r*f CH?'nnnT"pNTS*
2 • CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORINE.
iMt»HIIC*L HC6UbT6»oa«
MISflUliTS
IINTTS
0.01U
"G/L
0 a 0511
0 05U
¦ M
0.05U
"G/b
0.05U
UG/L
0.05U
UG/L
0.05U
"G/b
>\ • ¦> * i ¦
w • '' ' «¦»
"G-'~
0.10
"G'/Li
0.1U
"G/L
0.1"
"G/L
u. 1»
UG/L
0.1U
UG/L
0, 111
"G/L
0. l"
UG/L
0.5"
"G/l,
0.5"
"G/L
1 .on
UG/L
U.5U
"G/L
0.5"
UG/L
0.50
UG/L
1.0"
"G/L
0.5"
UG/L
1,0"
"G/L
• •
UG/L
• •
"G/L
m m
"G/L
•i •
"G/L
• •
UG/L
Mai
UG/L
"G/L
"G/L
"G/L
0.5"
UG/L
ojiu
"G/L
COMPOUND
ALDR1N
MEPTACHLOR
HkPTXcHI/O
alpha-bhc
bEXA-BHC
UANMA-UHC
DELTA-BHC
R EPOXIDE"
(LiNDANfcJ
tn /
(jlfcLOHl*
4,4'-Dl>T (P.k"«D0n
4,4'-DDE IPlpt-OOE)
4» 4'"DOD (p,p»-non)
£NUR1N
KNUOaULFAN Ii (BETA)
ENDOSWLFAN SULFATE
CHLOKDANi I TtCH, MIXTUREJ
PCB-1242 (ARUCLOH 1242J
PCa-1254 (AHUCiiOH 1254]
/I
PCB-1221 CAROCLOH 1221
PC0-12J2 (ARUCLOH 1242
PCfi-1348 (ARUCLOH 124MJ
PCb-1260 (ARUCLOH 1260
PCB-lOlfc CARUCLOR 1016
TOXAPHft
CHLOHDfcNfc /2
ALPHA-CHMJRDEnE /*
BETA CHLORDENE /2
OAMMA-CHLOHOt-NE /2
1-HYDROXXCHLURUENfc /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-WONACHLOR /2 " —
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOK /*
METHOXYCHLOR
ENURIN KETONE *
-------
KPHmfBn,PEG IV
ATHENS GFORCIA
07/17/Bfi PESTIC IDES/PCB'8 AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPuUNns
water
SAvpij(r NO, J fl6fl?2f>0 SAMHJjf TYiri riV'ti"
PROJECT NO.f 86-306 PROGRAM ELEMENTl RCRA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATE! FL
STATION 1,0.1 FIELD BLANK,01109,MOA009
flTORET STATION NOt
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME nj/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATK/TIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY| RECEIVED FPU*!
SAMPLF RKC'r>t DATE/TIMF, on/OO/00 PET ' D PY »
SEALEDf
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHODI
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INOR<; SAMPLE NO.I Mb
CONTRACT LABORATOPYfORGANIC) I *
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC}«
REMARK t NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAHPLE LOG VERIFIED BY I TRB DATA VEP TFIED PYl CHH
•••REMARKS##*
•••FOOTNOTES###
•A-AVFRAGE VALUE #NA-NQT ANALYZED #NAI•INTERFERENCES
•I-ESTIMATED VALUE #N-PRESUmPTJV* EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• kIacTOaL VALUE IS KNOUN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•n-MATEPIAL W*S ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
1 TWHFNIN0MVALUEATlIpEP0RTE§J'
-------
EP«.rsr>,"EG iv
ATHfWS GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCB'S AND OTHfTP CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS
W*TEP
"r-rrz w,: t?3fto sample: typfj fu,K»'»
PROJECT NO, t 86-306 PROGRAM ET,EMENTl PCRA
SOURCE! AFRICAN CYANAMTO
CITY I MILTON STATE! El
STATION 1,0,1 TRIP BLANK
8T0PCT STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME OJ/07/flfe
SAMPLE COLLECTION! 8T0P " "
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED EPO"!
SAMPLE PFC'Pi D
SEALED |
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
PATE/TIM*- OO/OO/OO
RErETVED EPO"
ATE/TIME OO/OO/OO REC'D BY»
INORG SAMPLE NO, I MU
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI D
CONTRACT LABORATORYfnRGANIC)l
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK | NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SlJRVF*
REM ARE|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY! TBB HAT* VFRIFIED RYl CHH
#»«rewapks«»»
•••FOOTNOTES**#
•A-AVER*2e VALUE •NA-NOT ANAIY'tO •NAI-INTERFFRENCES
•J-ESTlMATED VALUE »N-PRESllMPTtVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVen
^¦MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, S«"g CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2" CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES n? TECHNICAL CMLORDANE.
bAUIiTS
UNITS
0.05U
OG/L
S;83»
V'G/L
UG/L
0.05U
ug/l
0.05U
UG/b
0.05U
UG/L.
0,05U
UG/L
0, Q "¦ I1
UG/L
U, 11'
UG/L
8:1!!
"G/L
UG/L
0.1U
UG/b
O.IU
UG/L
0,111
UG/L
o:iu
UG/L
0,511
UG/L
0.5U
UG/L
1.011
UG/L
0.5"
UG/L
0.5U
UG/L
0.5U
UG/L
1.0"
UG/L
0.5U
UG/L
1 ,OU
UG/L
UG/L
mm
UG/L
UG/L
mm
UG/L
¦ «
UG/L
• m
UG/L
mm
UG/L
mm
UG/L
mm
I'G'L
0,5"
UG/L
0. ID
UG/L
COMPOUND
ALOW IN
H^TaSU^B EPOXIDE"
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-RHC
CAMMA-BHC ILXNDANE)
UELTA-BHC
I t A! t
L'^ClSULfA
1/ItLDRiN
4,4'«DUT (P, fc*'"DDT J
4 # 4'"DDE (P,P'»D0E)
4,4»-ODD (P,P»-DDU)
tNDRIN
tNDOSUJjFAN IJ ^BETA)
hb4]
1221)
1232)
U4H)
12601
luibj
ENDOSULFAN sulfate
CHLOHPANt (TECH. M1XTUHE)
PCb-1242 (AROClGh W42J
PCB-I254 lARUCLOH
PCB-1221 CAROCLOR
PCB-12J2 (ARUCLOH
PCB-1248 (ARUCLOH
PCB-1260 (ARUCLOH
PCb-1016 CAPOCLOH
TOXAPHfcNfc
CHLOHOfcNE fi
AL»>HA-CHLOHDENE /i
BETA CHLORDENE V2
GAMMA-CHLORDENIj. /I
l-HYDROXICHLOHDENt /2
gamma-chlohdane ri
TRANS-NONACHLOh /2
ALfHA-CHLOHDANkl /*
CISj-nON ACHLOH /2
HETHUXJCHLUB
ENDPIN KETONE
-------
r",
OT/IT/»« K(Tte»M/MI<* AND °3j|f(llCMI,OM,nTCI1 COMPOtlHOS
«»MPtE sn.f «6C1??<16 SAMPI.t TYPSt PUHPbLK
PROJECT NO.I 06-306 PRUGRAtf ELEMENT! RCRA
SOURCEI AMfpiCAN CYANAMI0
CITY! MILTON STaTEI »"L
""f "tit i.o«-i#oiii*#',oao22
STORET STATION «0I
SAMPLE COLLECTION I START OATE/TIME 03/06/Bb
AMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TTMF 06/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FRU«l
SAMPLE RKC'D| DATR/TXMC oo/OO/O" REC'D PYl
SEALEDi
CHEMIST! CHH
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO,! MD
C0NTR*cT LABORATOPYtORGANICl!
CONTRACT LA«ORATOH*fINORGANIC)I
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYl TRB DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•«*remarks*»«
•••FOOTNOTES**#
... _#a-avera3e VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED »n a I • interferences
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N«PRESUMPTTVfc EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-AcTUAL VALUE IS KNOW TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL HAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THK NUMBER IS
THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
1. WHEN NO VALUE TS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDA"E CONSTITUENTS,
2, CONSTITUENTS OP METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHlORDANE,
ifgli
u;usu
ojo&B
o.umj
u, in
U.1U
o.Iu
O.IU
0, JU
U,1U
O.IU
u.bu
0.JU
1.yu
0.5U
u.bu
0.5"
1 ,uu
u.bu
1.UU
0,5U
U.1U
u«/L
uS/L
U(i/U
ny/u
UCi/L
ug/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
"G/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
JP
BkcaomRc-
6JkHNA«»f1t
bkibTA*BHC
«,«tUUaUi,rA>< 1 lAl.frtA.'
UlbbUMIN
4,*'-our
4 » 4' "DDE tf.P'-DOeiJ
4»4.,«uuu iP.P«»uoo;
£N0K1N
fcNOUSULPAN 11 IHfclAi
EnDOSULFA" BULrAte-
CHLUHUANt U'EVH, MlA'iMM.)
UHUCLUM U*d)
' (AKUCLUA
(AKOCLUK
IAH0CLU8
tAKUCLUM
IARUCLUA
(AHUCLOR
PCH-122I
PCS-U ill
PCB-134B
PCB-liOO
Ko-lUlb
TUXAPMENfc
CHLOKUbNt ti
ALPHA«CHLUHDENt
BETA CHLORDENE
UZIJ
l*4»J
liou;
1010)
GA«MA«CHLURDfcNL
1-HYUROXlghLUKUENt.
GAnMA-CHLOKDANE
TRANS«nONACHLOK
ALPHA-CHLUHDANfc
Cld-NONACHLUK
ME'IHUXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
It
/a
ri
rt
/i
rt
rt
/i
-------
07/17/86
73WB" .Sr"«-Vf.Vrf»W "»***&&«* b¥£W«
EPt-rsn,»rc Iv
*t«e«»s cropcr*
PERTICIDM/PCBR ANALYSIS, MISC
DATA reporting SHEET
WATER
SAcp^r Mr;.t
* v»ni r ~v
/ mMimWniLrrriUL HtUtlttrtf**
ursi'LTs ini uo/L compound name
l.ou
i«on
100U
l"0"
2.0U
4.0H
1.0U
l.uL
0.11'
niCAHBA
mr*
MCP A
DICHLOHUPHOP
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
2,4-DE
DXNOSEB
KtPONE
PROJECT NO.| Bb-3Pb PROGS AH ELEMENT I RCPA
SgUPCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATE I fL
STATION I.D.I Hh-19,U»110,KOAOln
6T0PET STItIO" noi
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TJMP 0J/05/R6
SAMPLE1 COLLECTIOM STOP PATE/TIM* 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY I
SAMPLE PEC'ni
SEALEPI
CHEHISTI
ANALYTICAL
PEfETVFD FROMt
D»TP,/TlMr OO/OO/OO REC'O Blfl
*"ETH0D|
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE *0« D
CONTRACT L*BOPATOPY(ORG*HIC)I
CONTRACT LAflORATOP*(IK'ORGANTC)|
REMARK| NATIONAL CF»n!l*'OWAT£i> SUPVY
REMARK|
INOPG SAMPLE nn.| Ml)
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TRB
•••REMARKS***
flATA VEPIFIEP PYI CHH
•••FOOTNOTES***
—^5eS««¥fovSirL,er
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual value is known td pe Greater than value given
«U-fiiTERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
TME ESTIMATED MINIMUM O1'AMTTT*TT0N LIMIT,
-------
rr
R7WRN* C,r,u«Gl H
07/11/86 PESTIClDFS/PfBR ANALYSIS, »
DATA reporting SHEET
water
c ¦ IT' f- . i r* rt ', #-f|
PROJECT NO.t Bh-306 PPUGRAM ELEMENTI RCPA
SOURCEl AMfcRlCAK CYANA*lD
CITY| mILTU*> STATFI ^L
STATION I.O.l M-«-20,0t 102,HOAO0?
8T0RET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START rmr./TIHF 03/03/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STnp n*TE/TI»»"' no/00/00
COLLECTED BY | HCCETVED FROM!
sample REC'nt d»t^»/ti»«p «o/on/oo rst'd ry«
SEALEDl
CHEMIST I
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE Nfjf p INORG SAMPLE NO. I MD
CONTR»CT LABORATORY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LAR(.lRATO"Y(IwOR<;»fTC11
REMARKt NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYj TBB RATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES#**
• A-AVEPAGE VALUE ~HA-NUT ANALYZED »NAI"INTERFERENCES
•j-estimateo value •n-preshmptivit evidence of presence of material
•k«acT»al value ts knuwn to he liss than value given
•L-ACTUAL VALUF IS K^O^N TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE SIVE*
•y-MATFRIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR fitlT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINImIH OUA»'TIT»TTn»' LIMIT,
HtSVlLTS IN I UG/t» COMpnUHU NAME
1.0" "1CAMBA
m - woN
1001) MCPA
2.0U D1CHL0R0PK0P
4,01) 2,4-D
1.0U 2,4,5-T
4,0': 2,4-n&
1.0" DINOSEB
0,1" KEPUNE
-------
brnvr.oiiiFtv
•fWENS GroPGIA
"07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCRS »NALYSIS, HISC
DAT* RFPORTING SHEET
MATE"
?n»i"p Kir2°2 ouorr fvor. •«nn|«ir,
PROJECT HO.| 86-306 PROGRAM EtEMENTl RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICA*! CYANAMTD
CITY I MTLTON STATE» FL
STATION 1,0,1 MW-21,«n<13,MOAO03
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTIONl START DATE/TIMF 03/03/*6
SAMPLE COLLECTION} STOP HATE/TIMr 00/00/00
COLLECTED HY: PECETVEP F«0»«
SAMPLE RfcC'Dl D*TE,/TIMr 00/00/0(1 RFX'n "Y»
SEALED|
CHEMISTI
ANALYTICAL HETHOOl
CASE NO. I .mi ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE an,» MD
CONTRACT LAKORATORYfOBGANIC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(INORGANICS I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKI
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TUB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••remarks***
••••••••«••••••••••••••*•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*•••*••
•••FOOTNOTES#**
_ •A»A¥EFAGE VALUE •NA-Nnr ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTlMATEn VALUE •N-PHFSUHPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE L^SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTtlAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE rflVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTEO. THE NUMBER IS
~ THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTIT»TTO'J LIMIT,
KfS"l/TS I»l UO/I, CuMPOUNU NAME
1,0" DICAMUA
?c s&rN
100U MCPA
2,0" UICHLOROPHOP
4,OU 2,4-D
l.OIJ 2,4,5-T
4,0" 2,4-Pt
1,0H niNOStH
O.l'i KEPUNE
-------
/17/86
P6ST1CI0ES/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
0*T» REPORTING SHEET
WATER
S»«Drir «in<| «r;r »»nri uqVxL
PROJECT NO. I flb-30ti PROGRAM El,EMENTt «Ct»A
SOURCEl AFRICAN C*RNA*ID
CITY I NILTO* STATgi rL
fTATlON I,0,| MK-?2,uttf>7,MOAOOT
TOPET STlTIOM NO I
SAMPLE COLLECTIONj ST*«T PATE/TIMF 03/04/R6
SAMPLE COLLECTION| fTOP nATE/TIM* OO/OO/OO
COLLECTED BYt "KCETVED FROMJ
5AMPLF RCC'Dl DATE#/TIf*E 00/00/00 REP ' 0 BXJ
SEALED:
CME*1ST«
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE WO. * 1111 ORG SAMPLE *01 T> INORG SAMPLE NO. I *0
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANTC)I
CONTRACT LA«ORATORY(INORGANIC)I
REMARK| NATIONAL GhOUNl)«ATe« SURVEY
REMARK t
SAHPLF LOG VERIFIED BY I T*B DATA VERIFIED BY I CH«
•••remarks***
»NA?NqT ANJ^YZED i«NAl-INTERFERENCES
•••FOOTNOTES***
• A"AVERAGE VUL'lE ... + - +
•J»FSTIMATED VALUE •N«PRF<5UMPTT\fe EVIDENCE Or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TD BE L'SS THAN VALUE GIVrN
•l-actoal value ts k»
-------
rp».*sn,*C« iv
•THEWS CroBGIA
:iDE8/PCBS »N»LYSIS, "
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
s*MPtr to,i psri'?"? s»mplc T*Brt 0HnC5S"Ei¦'.¦
PROJECT NCI, | *6-306 PROGRAM ELEMENT I XCH
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY I MILTON STATEl ft
STATION 1.0,1 PW-4,01111.MQA011
STOPET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIMF 03/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION t STOP PATE/TTMF no/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FPU*"}
SAMPLE PEC ' 01 DATE# /TIME O0/00/fl0 REC'D B*l
SFALEPJ
CHEMISTI
ANALYTICAL METHODj
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOI D INOPG SAMPLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LAPORATORYCORGANIC) I
CONTRACT LAnORATOPYdNORGiNTCU
REMAP*! NATlO'iAL CHn|lNpw*T6P SL'RVFY
REMARK f
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED PTI T*B DATA VERIFIED Btl ChH
•••remarks**#
•••FOOTNOTES«»«
•A-AVEfAGE yALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-1NTERFERKNCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PREST!»iPTIVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE TS known to Be LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTWAL value IS KNOWN TO nl GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL «AS ANALYZED Fflfl B»T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MTMMijh QUANTITATION LIMIT,
results ini uc/v compound name
i.ou dicamba
2.0U DALAPON .
lOQU MCPP
1O0U MCPA
i.OU DICHLOROPROP
4.0U 2,4-D
1.00 2,4,5-T
4 ,> i • *s j,n[i
ilou DiNUSbR
0.1M KEPONE
-------
VtWfcHS
7/86 PESTlCIDFS/prB* ANALYSIS* "ISC
DATA HFPOPTJVG SHEET
water
K»MPT,* MO,t oS»JO(.ir tvoc. Doirrsw^.l,
PROJECT NO, | 86-306 PROGR AM ELEVFNTI RC«»
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMID
CITY! MILTO*' STATE! »"L
STATION X.U.t P«l-4 0UPLICATE.011J?,«OA0!2
6TORET STATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TTT 03/05/Rb
SAMPLE C0LLFCT1ONt STOP PATE/TTMF 00/00/00
COLLECTFO BY I DECEIVED FPOVj
SAMPLE REC'm D»TE,/TTME OO/UO/no PEC'ti P * I
SEALEPt
CHEMIST!
analytical kethodi
CASE NO.I lilt ORG SAMPLE NUl P IM1RG SAMPLE NO.I MU
CONTRACT LABORATnPYfO«»GANTC) !
CONTRACT LABOR* TClOYf I»!OPC*NIC> I
REMARK| NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VER1FJFD BY I T*R PATA VERIFIED BY t CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
»*•»VERACE VALUE *N*-Nqt ANALYZFt) *NAl"INTERFERENCES
" •j-EjSTTMATEB VALUE •N-PRESUmMTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTIJAI, VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVFh
•l-actijal value is known to be greater than value given
•U-MATERIAL was ANALYZED FOR but HOT DETECTEP, THK NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
XM\ CQKfQUWC MkMC
l.OU OXCAMBA
M W°*
ioou MCPA
2.0U PKHLOROPROP
4.0U 2,4-D
1.0" 2,4,5-T
1.0" ?»4"DB
l.OU PINUSEB
0.1" KtPONE
-------
- mzw.m tv
ATHr.PS GEORGIA
07/17/B6 PrsTICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS, *ISC
DATA RFPOHTIMG SHEET
HATE"
'.'-'¦Pir wn.i R6n?2'5 SBKPIF TYPE! LE Af UFTFC
PROJECT NO.» Bfc-SOf. PROGRAM ELE«ENT| RC&A
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMln
CITY I MILTON State t Fb
STATION J.D.I liDS-2,011 18,mOAP!R
STOREt STATION NO I
SAMPLF COLLECTION I START OATE/TIMF 03/06/86
SAMPLF COLLECTION| STOP PATf/TTWF 00/00/00
COLLECTED PYl PECETVFD fPOMi
samplf Bfc'nt d*tp»/tTmk oo/on/r>o REr»r> byi
SEALEDl
chemisti
ANaMTUCAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I nil ORG SAMPLE" NOi D INORG SAMPLE NO,I ND
CONTRACT LAPORATPPyfUPGANlClt
CONTRACT LAROPATORYfINORGANIC)|
REMARKi NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VFRIFIFD RY| TRB DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
••{•REMARKS***
••«ronTNOTES«*»
•K-ACTUAL value IS KNOWN TO BE LFS8 THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actual value is known to be greater than value given
•U-MATERJAL HAS ANALYZFD TOR BOT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT,
5E8ULTS IN | UC/L COMPOUNI> NAME
PU D1CAMBA
40U „ DALAPUN
2000U MCPP
SOUOU MCPA
40U DXCHLOAOPROp
sou 2»1-S
20U 2,4,5-T
sou 2,4-c;-.
20U OlNOSfcB
0,2" KfcPQNE
-------
rvimrgvif
»TH*US GFnPGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS, MISC
RATA REPORTING SHEET
WATBP
RAMPTE NO,| Pfcri?2a3 SUMPL^ TYPE!
PROJECT NO. | R6-306 PROGRAM EfE«ENT| *CPA
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYUNAMID
CITYi MILTON S^nTft rj,
STATION 1,0,1 Sl-1,01115.HUA015
STORET STATION KJI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START PATE/TIME 03/06/Bfc
SAMPLE COILBCTinM STOP nATE/TTMF Cp/00/O0
COLLECTED BY I PECETVED F»UH
SAMPLE REC'M DATE,/TI*F no/Cin/OO RECTI PYI
SEALEP|
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL. METHOD I
CASE N0.« 1111 ORG SAMPLE HOl 0 INORC SAMPLE NO.I «b
CONTRACT T.APOHATORYfOPGANTC) I
CONTRACT LABORATORY INORGANIC)I
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUND*AT*R SURVEY
REMARK |
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY| TPB PATA VERITIEn PYl CHH
•••REMARKS***
##«FOPTN0TES**»
•A-AVtpAC| VALUE *NA»NQT ANALYZED »NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-tSTIMATED VALUE #N-PRES&MPTIVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•((•actual value is known to be less than value given
•l-actual value is known to r| greater than valuf given
•U-HATERIAL was ANALYZED FOR but not DETECTED, the NUMBER is
the ESTIMATED minimum uiiantITRTthn LIMIT,
RSBMLT& IN I UG/1, CUHPOUWD hfcKE
1,00 DICAM&A
2.0U PAtAPON
100" MCPP
100U MCPA
2,01' DICHLOROPROP
4.0U 2,4-D
1.611 2,4,5-T
7.*-re
1.011 DINUSbB
0,1" KfcPUNt
-------
Mt.rgfi.wcc iw
»T"FNS G^OPCIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDE5/PCBS ANALYSIS, MI8C
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATEO
KIUPT r Mnt ] QftfMtJUl Sfl^DIT
PROJECT no.I Rb-JO* P»00H*M Et>EmENTt »C»»
SOURCE! AMERICAN CYANAMIO
CITY I MILTON STATE! FL
STATION I.D.I MW-fi,0J104,McAi)04
STORET STATION NO!
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STaRT r>ATE/TTMF 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP nATE/TTMF *0/00/00
COLLECTED BY! RECEIVED FROM!
SAMPLE PEC'nj n*TE»/TTMF 00/00/on REC'D BII
SEALED|
CHCMISTl
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE No* t 1111 ORG SAMPLE Nqi D INORG 8A*PLE NO.I MD
CONTRACT LAHORAToRYfORGANlC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY?I^HPGAMIC)!
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED HYl TUB DATA VERIFIER BY I CHH
•••REMARKS#*#
#•#«•••##•*••••••••••••••~••»»••••«••••••••••••«•**••••••'••»**»*
•••FOOTNOTES***
.ssaifM&.'m .;:s:?8i!,5;fKzi?Ici;»;s's?,S5isEE?rsp..T«J,l
•{^ACTUAL VALUE if KNOWN TO r| GREATER^TRAN^VAIiUE^CIVEN
«U-MATEHIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
ESTIMTED MINIMUM OTUNtTTATTO* LImIT,
THE
pF.8UL.TS !•< | UG/L COMPOUND NAME
2,0" DICAMBA
4.U" DALAPUN
200U MCPP
20011 MCPA
4,0D DICHLOROPROP
B.O'J 2»4-D
2.0V 2,4,5-T
8,U'» 2,4-09
2.0U niNUSER
0,2'J KEPONfc
-------
K»>»-rar>, »cc iv
ATHENS GEORGIA
oi/n/»ib KSTiciDirs/pCM «ibc
DATA REPORTING SHEET
M*Ter
cKMpjo* *ip#* Rfcri^2®^ ¦
PROJECT NO.I 8f>«306 PROGRAM ET.EMENTl RC"A
SOURCEt African CYANAMID
CITTI MILTON STATE I rt,
STATION I.U.I MN-1J, OH21, HOA021
STORET SIATIOH NOl
SAMPLE COLLECTION| START PATE/TIME 03/03/«6
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONi STOP OATE/TTME r>0/00/00
COLLECTED BYt PECETVEO FRO*!
SAMPLE REC'ni 0»TE«/Tt*E no/00/00 PEC 1 D Rtl
SEALEDl
CHEMIST t
ANALYTICAL METHODI
INORG SAMPLE NO. I *D
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE "Ul D
CONTRACT LAPORATQRYfORGANIC)I
CONTRACT I.ABO»ATORYf IN0R5ANIC) i
REMARK I NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARKl
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED B*| TRH DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES*»*
•A-AVEPAGE VALUE *MA-NQT ANALYZED "HAI-IHTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATET) VALUE *N-PRrS«MPTt7E EVIDENCE Or PRESENCE Or MATERIAL
•k-actual value is known to be lfss than value givfn
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS known to be greater than value GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, T"E N'IMBER IS
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM OI'AVTTT'TTON LIMIT,
RESULTS IN| UG/L CUMPOUNu NAME
i.0'1
D1CAMBA
i.ou
loon
DALAPUN
MCPP
100IJ
MCPA
2.0U
D1CHL0R0PR0P
4.0U
2.4-1)
1.0"
4.01'
2.4,5-T
2,4-r;-
D1NUSCH
l.OU
0,21'
KEPUNb
-------
cpn.rsn.atc rv
ATHENS Gro«GIA
OVn/86 PESTICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS, «I3C
PATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
S»UP(E no,; o«rt?2»7 sa^PL? m<)nm;
PROJECT "0.| 86-306 PROGRAM ELE«EMT| «CRA
SOURCE! AFRICAN CY AN A11D
CITY! hiltun stat«:i rt
STATION I.D.I MM-1B,01100,MOAOOft
STOPET STATION MUI
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIM* O3/05/R6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIMF "0/00/00
COLLECTED RV: REf"ET vEl> FRO" !
SAMPLE RliC'ni DATE,/TIWK 00/00/00 REC'D BYl
SEALED!
CHEMIST!
ANALYTICAL METHOD!
CASE NO.I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NO! P INORG SAMPLE NO.! ML)
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC 1!
CONTRACT LAPORATORY(INriRGAUTC) J
REMARK! NATIONAL GROUNDWATER SURVEY
REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED B*! TR« HATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
• ••REMARI<5»»»
•A-aVEPAGE VAL"E •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERI'ERENCES
- - — ——— —». — TVF jy J*™"-™ — — — — — —
••#rOOTNOTES«»»
• A-AVEPAGE v» . _ . ...
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N.PRESUMPTTVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OE MATERIAL
• K-ACTUAL VAL'IE 15 KHOWN TO BE L'SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVE"
•U-MATEKIAL WAS ANALYZED FOP B"T NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE ESTIMATED MTMllM (111AWTTT»TTOfl LIMIT,
HESULTS IN | UG/T, COMfOUNU NAME
1 .oil PICAMBA
m w°" -
100" MCPA
2.0U D1CHL0R0PH0P
4 , QU 2,4-D
1,0U 2,4,5-T
4,0" * <«"»*
1,UU OiNOStr.
0,111 KEPONK
-------
EPa-e
-------
/s A e A *'/' a "A i- r i* I * ~ A * a ciiMf V r ar&T& —
rp».Mo.Bee xw
ATHENS g^opci*
07/17/S6 PESTtCIl)F.B/PCB8 ANILY8IS. fISC
RATA HFP0HT1NG SHEET
vHfEp
SHmc»i«* MO#! n.*.ri?7°7 sm*pi '
PROJECT NO, i 86*306 PROGPAM FT.KTNTl RCPA
SOURCEl AMERICA* CYANAMIn
CITY I MILTON STATEI *1,
STATION I.D.I LCS,UM 16,M0Anift
STORET STATION «0I
SAMPLE COLLECTIPNi START r>ATE/TTMF "3/07/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTIONI STOP PATE/TIMF «0/00/O(r
COLLECTED BY I PF^ETVEP f PO»" I
SANPLF RtC'Pl DATK«/TI«if OC/OO/OO PEC' D BYI
SEALED!
chehisti
ANALYTICAL METHnDl
CASE NO. I lilt ORG SAMPLE WOl D 1N0RG SAMPLE Nfl.l
CONTRACT LAROPATPRYtOPGAlTCTl
CONTRACT LABORATORY ( INORGANIC} |
REMARKi NATIONAL RRPU"D«ATEP SURVFY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYt TRR PA^A VERIFIER CMH
• ••REuApl<'!!***
»««FOOTNOTES»»*
•A-AYERAGE VALUE »N A-tJOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATEP VALUE •N-PRESUMPTTVf: EVIDENCE Or PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOW* TO pg LrgS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAI. VALUE TS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL »AS ANALYZED FOR B"T NrT DFTfCTEP, THE NUMBER IS
THE ESTTMATFP fINTMl'H Ul'AVTTT'TTON limit.
RESULTS IN| UG/L COMPOUND NAME
4.0U DICAM8A
?t!» W"1
2001) MCPA
4.0U DICHLORUPHOP
e.OU 2,4-D
2,OH 2,4.5-T
B.y1' 7.4-Dl
2.0(1 PINOSLR
U,XU PEPUNE
/
-------
JI>I»'Pf f m V|> n«»r®re»
" rp*-E«n»Rrc fv
ATHENS CFOBGIA
07/17/86 PE6TICIDES/PCBS ANALYSIS^" *ISC
DATA REPORTING sheet
water
SAMOl.r MP. I R*f1?2«6 SAMPLF TYPE I cn "POL*
PROJECT MO,I 80-306 PROGRAM EtEME*T« "C*»
SOURCE I A*£ric1N CYANAMID
CITY I KILTO" STATEt rt,
STATION 1,1), I P'lMP EUHIP *L* LOS-1 , 011! 4, MQA022
STOPET STATION *LU
SAMPLF COI.LFCTIONI START OATE/TIMF 03/06/86
SAMPLF CULLFCTIONi STOP lATE/TTME no/00/00
COLLECTED HYl PECETVFD KRO^I
SAMPLE RECTI 06TF./TIMF. "0/00/00 PEC'D BY I
sealedi
CHEHISTl
ANALYTICAL METHOPI
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAMPLE NO, I ML'
CONTRACT LAPUPATORYCOPGANICII
CONTRACT LABrjRAT(ipy(lM0RGAMC1 I
REMAhKj NATIONAL GROUND*ATtP SUPVEY
REMARK i
SAMPLE LOG VERIFjFU PY» TRP DATA VERIFIED BY! CHH
•••PEMaRKS»««
•••FOOT"OTES»««
• A-AVEFAGE VALl'E »na-MQT ANALYZED •NAI"INTERFERENCES
•O-fSTlMATED VALUF #N-PFESUmPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k-actuai. value ts known to be less Than value givfn
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•SI-MATERIAL w^6 ANALYZFP EOR BtlT nor DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
THF ESTIMATED hInImMm uI'AmtTT »TTon LI«lT,
RESULTS IN| UG/h CO«POUNl> NAME
l.OU DICAMBA
m mr«
100" MCPA
2.0U DICHLOROPKOP
4.011 2,4-D
l.OU 2,4,5-T
«.l"
l.UII DINUStH
O.iu KtpONE
-------
* S«»Pf.E A«D KfAI.r^Tl" "aMCefENT sv sTt»
rpH.FSn.PEK IV
ATHENS CFoPGIA
07/17/86 PESTJCIDF6/PCBS ANALYSIS# »"18C
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
sampijF nr.i Bbrt?3oc ssfPi.F n": »•:
PROJECT NO, | 86-306 PROGRAM ELEWF*!T| RCRA
SOURCEt AMERICAN CYANAMIU
CItyi milton statei fl
station i.p.i tpip «l*nk
stupet STATION NO|
SAMPLE COLLECTION j START DATE/TIMF OJ/07/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTION I STOP DATE/TIMF f>o/00/00
COLLECTED BY I RECEIVED FROM
Sample REC'ni datE,/tI*f no/on/no PtrT Br »
SEALED!
CHEMIST I
ANALYTICAL METHODl
CASE NO.J 1111 ORG SAMPLE NOl D INORG SAfpLE NO,I MD
CONTRACT LABORATORY(oPCAmTC)I
CONTRACT LA«OPATtiRYf x^O"GANTC11
HEM ARK | NATIUNAL GROUNDWATER SURVFY
REMARK|
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED PYl T*»B DATA VERIFIED BY I CHH
•••REMARK?#*#
•••FOOTNOTES***
... •A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-MOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTFRFERENCE5
•J-ESTIMATEP VALUE *N-PRESIlMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PHESENCL OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL value IS known TO BE LFgS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*y-*ATERIAL WAS ANALYZFD FOr B"T NOT DETECTED, THE N'IMRER IS
the ESTIMATED MTNTMUm Qtl ANTIT B ITnN LIVIT,
• «•••«««!iVTICAli KCtfCttTfi*****
RFSULTS INI UG/I. COMPOUND mANC
1,(11' DlCAMBA
S.UV PALAPQN _
100U MCPP
100U MCPA
2,(JD DICHLOROPKOp
4,01' 2,4-D
1,0" 2,4,5-T
4 r* * • <> um
ijou 6iv4DSbB
0,K' KEPONE
-------
,«««pi f? a«d "«ii/iee«E»T «»»«><
fPA-Kan.BEC IV
hr»E*>a C^obci*
07/17/86 PESTtCIDFS/PC&B ANALYSTS, MISC
0ATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
;n,: f!sci22«8 SBfPL' tki-Ei r L r> K 'j K
PROJECT "0,1 8b-3<16 PBOKRUM ELEME*Tl RCRA
§0URCFl AMERICAN CY»na«"Tu
ITYl MILTON 8TATE« 'L
8TATION X-O.i FIELD hi,AN*, at 1 09, HOA"09
8TQRIST STATION ^oj
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIMF "3/05/86
SAMPLE COLLECTIONJ STOP T>ATE/TIM*: "0/00/00
COLLECTED HV: RfirEIVFD KR0"l
SAHPLE REC'ni OATE,/Tl^E 00/'jfl/00 REC'O 8KI
SEALED|
CHEMIST t
ANALYTICAL METHOD I
CASE NO.I 1111 OPG SAMPLE MOl D INORG SAMPLE NO.I MO
CONTRACT LANORAT'JH Y (nRGANTC > I
CONTRACT LABORATORY(I NORfi An IO I
REMARK| NATIONAL GHOUMD*ATEH SURVEY
REMARK t
SAMPLr LOG VERIFIED R*» TRH DATA VERIFJED BY I CHH
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•k-actoal value is kmown to be l
-------
'am—rz-k A**n a**avy&x& cisnbwt srstf
rPA»rsr># ^CI||TS«I
RESULTS 1N| US/L COMPOUND NAME
l.OU DICAMBA
m m?w
loou MCPA
2.0U DICHLOROPROP
4.Of 2,4-n
l.OU 2,4,5-T
4 , y'¦ 2.4-Oct
1.0" niNOSER
0,1" KEPONE
-------
s*"Pr,t: ««u /fat.YBI" "**aGC"c"r «rsrt«
FPS-ESP. "ICC XV
ATMens GEORGIA
07/17/86 PESTICIDES/PrnS ANALYSIS, *ISC
DAT* REPORTING SHEET
MATE"
SAMPLE un.l A6Cl22*4 E"."TL:
v «r*. n «u» v
PROJECT no.! B6-306 PROGRAM EL£M£»TI RC"A
SOURCE I AMgpiCAN CYANAMIl)
CITY t MILTON STATE I rt,
STATION I.U.I FIELD BLANK,ul 10(5,MOAO06
5T0HET SXATION NOI
SAMPLE COLLECTIONI START DATE/TIMF 03/04/96
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP PiATE/TTMr 00/00/00
COLLECTFD HYt PE«"ETVCD FROMj
6AMPLF PEC ' 1? I D»TE»/TT"
-------
07/30/86
SA"Pr.e: a*>o a»*t,rsi* "nmcE'tNi srsrc-
TPA-ES"."EC XV
ATHfTIs GEORGIA
SPFCIFTEn ANALYSIS
P ATA REPORTING SHEET
MTEP
i;n,i K„rv?2q7
;. c.' r; a T r
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
lf»U HU/i, CKANIUE
U.30U MC/b N1THAXE-NITHIIE NITKUGEN
ifiO MG/L SULEATE
5" MG/L AM«0N1A
0.61 MG/L PUROEAflLE ORGANIC CAKHON
2*0 IIG/L PURGEABLE OHGANXC HALUGtN
?? ?g/l tutal organic carbon
UG/L PHENOLS'" C 4 A AP )
40J IIG/L TOTAL QKGAN1C HALUGfcN
SlUMfcX
UU7iU
UU64U
UOV«b
uoeiy
UOOH0
ill s y
PROJECT NO. | flfe-JOh PBOGH»m et.E^E^Ti RCRA
SOURCE I AMERICAN C**NAWTD
CITY! MILTON STATE I
STATION 1,0.1 LCS# U t J 1 #>» HRAO t •»
STORET STATION VCl
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START riATE/TTwr 03/07/86
SAMPLE COLLrCTinwi STOP 1ATE/fI»«* oo/on/no
collected evj rk^etvpo fpo^s
SAMPLE Rt'C'lij 0*tE/tI"E 00/00/00 Pfjr'O nvs
SEALED|
CHE"1STI GKM CHb«ISTj
ANALYTICAL m£THHoS
CASE NO • I 1111 ORG SAfPLF MI.M P T NOHG SAMPLE NH.I «U
CONTRACT LABORATORY(ORGANIC) 1
CONTRACT LAHOHATnPY(I«10RG&NTO j
REMARK! NATIONAL GRUtlMPW AT<£w SURVEY
REMAHKJ
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI THH nATA VERTFIt'P PYI GKP
•••REMAPKS«»#
K-UUALITV CtlKTRHL IvoiCATFS THAT "ATA ARE IIMJSEABLE
R-COMPOUND MAY OH MAY MOT SF PRFSFNT
R-RE8AMPLING AND REANALYSTS IS NECESSARY For VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-E5TIMATF.0 VALUE
#NA-NQT ANALVZEO «NAI-IWTERFERENCES
#N-PRES'!w®TIVE FVXDEHCE OF PRESENCE UF MATfcRlAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE TS KNOWN TP Bg LFSS THAN VALUE GTVFN
•l«actual value is k«>own to «e gpfatfr than valuf given
•U-MATFRIAL WAS ANALYZED for RIIT NOT DETECTED. THE DUMBER TS
THE "IVI'IUV nFTtCTTfi1' Ll^IT
-------
07/30/86
sa<4pijtc «nd «««i.rsiK »«N«GC«c«r srsrrH
~pi.rsn,»rc iv
ATHENS G«-(iRGTA
SPECIFIED ANMjKSIS
r>ATA REPORTING SHEET
water
ALTXICAL KC&Ul
SIVQT.C MP,t
S»»Plr 1 YbF J wp''"L
Rt5UlT8
0,021)
U.30U
l.ou
B,b
Ub
10
1,0V
Vjjw
60J
UNIT5
mg/l
Mfi/L
M(i/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
"S/ii
I1G/L
PARAMtTER
CXANIUE
NITHiTE-NlTRIIE NlTHUGtM
8UWATE
AMHON1A
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CAKBUN
PURGEABLE ORGANIC HAbUGKN
TUTAI, OHGAN1C CARBON
r' r' *•
Ph?nn£s l«AAP)
TOTAL QRCAN1C HALOGEN
BiOHtT
Od/^O
UUftJO
00»4b
U0610
UU6H0
00940
iifSM
PR0.1ECT NQ.t Rb«30b ppijGPM* ET.E"ENTI PCPA
SOURCFt AMERICAN ClANAnlO
Cityi milton st»tei fj,
STATION x.0,1 W-5,01 104,*0*004
ST0R6T STAT 10"! 'JOt
SAMPLE COLLECT1 ON t STAHT n*TE/TlMF 03/04/86
SAMPLE COLLFCTIHNj STOP HATE/TIN" "0/00/00
COLLECTED HY| RECETVFD FRl)vI
SAMPLF PEC 11 i | i>AtF/T1mE U
SAMPLF LOG VERIFIED pv» T«B
•««oehaPKR*««
n*T* VERIFIED RYl GK&
»»»FOnTNOTES«»»
~ A-AVERAGE V#LUE #NA-*'OT ANALYZED »NA1-INTErFERENCES
•J"ESTIMATED VALUF •N-PRESI'MPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF KATLRJAL
• K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO R(j LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•l-actuaTj value ts unowu tp be greater than vajuf given
•U-hATERJAL was ANALYSED for but not DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
TrtF ^lNI-U-' DETECTION M«IT.
-------
.s*npr,h, »*»4ee»e«r srsTt"
f-'P^-ra", nUTR IV
ATHENS GEORGIA PfcSULlS
O.OJU
0.30U
07/30/86 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS 33
data htporting sheft 1.7
WATEP O.lOU
X?
5*J
S**iPI.E NO I HftC l?2*V TXt'M P». i .v. •• i>fc|j;T I 17
inu
PF0.1ECT NO.| B6-306 PRUGRUM ELEMFNT| RCHA
SOURCE I AMERICAN CYANAMln
CITY! MlLTUN statfj fl
STATION 1.0,1 Pri-4,0)111,"OAOH
STOPET STATION wo:
SAMPLE COLLECTION! RTlKT nATE/TXMP n3/05/«6
SAMPLE COLLfCTIHHS RTDP !)ATfc/TTMP Op/pn/Oit
COLLECTED HY | PECETvEd
SAMPLE REC'nj iutE/tI'E nn/oo/on hec'o Rf:
SEALED I
CHEMIST I GKB CHt'nST»
ANALYTICAL METMPO!
CASK NO. I Jill ORG SAMPLE "Of n INPRT 5 A y P Tj fc nn, t »L>
CONTRACT LAPOPATOPK(0PGRNTC1J
CONTRACT LAPi-'KAToHYf J*0R(;«NIC> t
REMARK | NATIONAL GHOU^O^ATEH siipVFY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VfRIFrrO BY J TPfc» riATA VFRIFIEn BY j GKR
•••REMARKS***
b.i
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NyT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFEPEWCES
•J-E5TIMTED VaU'E •N.PHFSUmPTTV* EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUF IS KNOWN TO RE L^SS TH»N VALl'E GIVFN
•L-ACTUAL VAIUE IS known TO RE GPFATEP THA« VALUE GIVEN
•u-matehjal was analyzed for b»it not detected, the number ts
THE M1I«'I«(IV. DETECTTun t/T'lT,
ONITS PARAMtTfcH
MG/L CYANIDE
MG/L NlTHA'iE-NlTKllE NITHUUtN
MG/L SULKATE
MC/L AMMONIA
"G/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CAHBUN
IJG/L PURGEABLE organic HALUUEN
WG/I, TOTAL flHGAhlC CAKdON
" ij' i Crii.u*' I "t.
'I(i/L PHENOLS C4AAP)
UG/L TUTAL UHGANiC HALOGEN
aiuKti
uu/ao
UU6JU
00*45
0001 u
oobttu
UOV-itj
iil Jw
-------
d*»PLC A "D *V4l*5|S £>*¦#• 3f ®f>icM
rPA-r«H* »r/? rv
ATwr*a Georgia
07/30/86 SPfCirTEP ANaUSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
sa^plf nr.t Rf,ri?2'!r! ss"T"Lr *»r,.; rrnCrs
rruutll i*u.i fO"i''i5 ps
SOURCEl Am£htCAM CKANAmIo
CITYl MILTU* 3T»TEt Fl
5ISTI'1N 1»°l' pl"4 DUPLICATE,Oj 1 l5,«O*012
6T0PET ST AT J (J*' UL»!
SAMPLE COMjFCTIdnj START r>ATE/TIMF 13/05/86
SAMPLF COLLFCTinfij STOP PATE/TIMF "0/00/00
COLLECTFP »Y| PETTVFD FR(j»?
SAMPLE REC'ni 0^tF/t1"E 00/nj/no Rfcc'n at|
SCA L En|
CHEM1STI GKH CHt-XSTl
ANALYTICAL METrtnm
CASE NO.1 nil ORG SAMPLE >'UJ D IfcORr: SAMPLE wn t Ml)
CONTRACT GAnORATOPY(OHRANTC)J
CONTRACT lAROPATfJRY 11NIC ^ «
HEMAFK f N All OIJAL GPPUNUWATfc'B SiJRVEY
REMARK:
SAMPLF LOG VERIFJfcp *Y| TPb I">ATa VERIFIEH HYJ CKH
•••R£MAPKS««*
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »rfA-NOT ANALYZED »HAI-XNTEKFE«ENCES
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUF •N-PRFSTJHPTTVE EVIDENCE or PRFSFNCE UF MATERIAL
•K-ACiUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TH pe LFSS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VaMJE IS known to re GREATER THAN VALUE RIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED for BUT not DETECTED. THfc NUMBER TS
THF ~'IMIMV" nKTeCTIOH LIUIT
RESULTS
UNITS
PARAMETER
O.01U
mg/l
CYANIDE
0-30U
}\
MG/L
N1TRA1E-NITRITE N1THUCKN
MG/L
SULFATE
MG/L
AMMUNIA
w™
MG/L
PUPGEABLE ORGANIC CAKBUN
UG/L
PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
f*9
MG/L
TOTAL ORGANIC CAKbOK
1 C
vg/l
rHMJPlP!
iny
DC,/ly
PHEMOLS ItAAV)
b.6
UG/L
TUTAL ORGANIC HALUGfcN
u J. UHK1
Uu7'iu
oubju
U0V45
0061 0
ouovu
O09«0
SiliU
-------
j*m~n,rr »wn
fpi.Fsn.iiee iv
ATMCNS GEORGIA
07/30/86 SPrCXFTen analysis
PATA KFPOBTING SHEET
WATER
e * -r*, t- tv«rj •' £ *
PROJECT NO,| U6-396 PROGRAM Et,E"E»ITI PCPA
SOURCEi AMERICAN CYANAMin
CITY! Mll.TOM 8T*TB« Fl
STATION I.D.I hw-24,01113,m0*013
STORET STATJO'J *01
SAMPLE COLLrCTlnNI START PATE/TThE "3/05/B6
SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP n*T«VTIMF 00/00/00
COLLECTFD tJY | REOETVEL' FRO"!
SAMPLE BEC'nj OAtR/TI«E 0/00 PETJn HY«
SEALED |
CHEHISTI GKB CHEMIST|
ANALYTICAL "ETMOnI
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAMPLF MJl P INORC SAMPIE ND • Ml)
CONTRACT LAPORATOPYCORGAtfTC)I
CONTRACT LAROPATriRY(INORG^ICI J
REMAHK | NATIONAL GRfiUNDWATfiP SURVEY
REMARK |
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED B*l T«B DATA VEHIFlEO HYI GK»
•••REMARKS«««
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVEPAGE VALUE •KA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI»INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE • N-PRESt'MPT JVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OK MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL value is known TO Pr LFSS THAN VALUE GIVfN
•l-actual value is know* to pf Speater tman value riven
•U.MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED for B"T NOT DETFCTtD. IHE NUMHER IS
THF mjvimijv DETECTION LIMIT
-Ji fresuti
*E*ULTS UN XTS PARA"fc.TtN
O.Oltl MG/L CKANIUK
O.JOU MU/b NlTHAiE-NlTHlTE NlTRUGth
150 «G/L SULFATE
1.0 MG/L AMMONIA
1.9 MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CAKBD*
M I'G/L PURGEABLE OHGANIC HALOUfcN
11 MG/L TOTAL OKGAMC CAHUON
ii" "o/i c "• !-."i •
i"U HG/L PHENObS 14AAP)
20 IJG/L, TOTAL 0KGAN1C HALOGEN
SiUhtX
U0720
U06JU
uoy«»
0U61U
vuowo
ills 0
t
(
(
r
-------
.> m ton awaits* i* aystk** *
fP/l-FS"tBKC IV
«TME*3 GroRCTA PfcSULTS
0.01U
07/30/86 SPECIMEN ANJkUSIS il*"
data reporting sheet 3.7
water ojji
i , V
?<"OIp C«MP[C TyPf't M0"«! 1 Ot'J
I All
7.b
PROJECT NP.I Hb-JOb PRIJGHAM M-E^ENTl PC»A
SOURCFl AMERICAN CY>NA«TD
ClTYl MILTOu STaTFs vj
STATION 1,0,1 mw.18,o11OM,MOAOO«
STORET STATION mm
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START HATE/TImF "3/05/Rfe
SAMPLE COLLECTION! stop nATp/TIMF no/UO/Oi)
COLLECTED BY I PFreTVPI.1 F"(JVj
SAMPLE REC'tij ii«tF/tI"P iiri/oo/dO PEC'O RYt
SEALED|
che*isti GKR C«E«ISTJ
ANA LYTIC AI< "ETHPdi
CASE NO. I 1111 ORG SAHPLf NU| n INORT. SAMPLE NO.i Ml)
CONTRACT LAPOPATOPY(ORGANIC)I
CONTRACT LABORATORY f INORGANIC) !
remark 1 KAriu^At. groundwater survey
remark J
SAHPLE LUG VERIFTEP RY| TBR HaTa VERIFIED RY! r,Kh
•••remarks***
••#FOnTNOTES**»
•A-AVERA^E VALUE »NA-NQT ANALYZED «NA1-INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTI^ATEn VALUF •N-PRESUmPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UF HATtRTAL
•K-ACtOAI. VALUE IS KNOWN Tn RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVFN
•L-ACTUAI, VALUE IS KMOKN TO PE GREATER THAN VALUF GIVEN
•U-HAJFRIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 0IIT NOT DFTFCTEP. THE NUMHtR IS
THE minimum DETECTIu*» LI"IT.
• •fcvtfxwju.rrrc'AL MfcaukTa*****
units PARAMtTtR
MG/L CYANIUE
MQ/li NXTRAXE-N1TKITE N1THUUKM
*G/li SULFATE
MG/L AMMUNIA
*G/L PURGEARLE OKGANIC CAKBUN
UG/L PURGEA0LE ORCANIC HALOGEN
MG/L TUTAL OKGANIC CAKbO*
"G/l Cril.ilF.irit.
I'G/L PMKNOLS C4AAPJ
IIG/b TOTAL OKGAMC HALOGtN
aiuMfci
OUJaU
uuojg
U0»45
0U610
OUfeoo
J " £ * '
ii'is 0
-------
* * ¦' F-- r r » wit x'/iir. ftr — r: *j » sysrir ¦
fpt-w.uee x»
ATHENS CfoHCXA rttflULTa
U.OIU
0. ill
07/30/86 SPFCXFTEn ANALYSIS V50
r>ATA HPP0HTX«G SHEET 1,3
WATER 0.10U
2fi00
loo
SfcvPl.s- oBdCMpM E'.EME"T| "CPA
SOURCE | AMERICA^ CYANA">Jn
CITY I MILTU" STATEt rj,
STATION 1,0,: 107,-0^007
STORET RTATTO" JO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION J START nATE/TH* 03/04/Rb
SAMPLF COMjECTIDn: st"P nAT(.:/TI*P "0/00/00
COLLECTFL1 bY: OirctT VKU Ft>u>'.
SAMPLF PtC'r<| 0»Tt/TI 'K /no/on PKC'n mh
SEALED:
chemist: chk»isti
ANALYTICAT' METHOD:
CASE no.: 1111 opg s»mplf »ui n jnpkg sa»pje no.: md
contract la"upatur y(upgmtc) :
CONTRACT T.APURATnHY ( P'UHGAwTC1 I
REM AUK : NSTIO'iAI, GKniniiWAT* P SI^V^Y
REMARK:
SAMPLF LOG VERIFIED PY: Tnp P»TA V*RIFIFH BY: GKP
• ••RF>/iPKR«»«
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE /AI.UE *iJA-N'OT AN»LYZ?D *N AI •INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTlMATfcD VALUE • N-PRFSIJmPI'TV*' EVIDENCE OF PHESENCE OF MATtPlAll
• K-ACTUAt. VAMJF is K"UWN TP PE LFSS THAN VALUE GIVFN
•l-actual value ts known th re greater than vatuf given
• U-MATERTAT. was ANALYZFD FOR B'lT NOT DFITFCTEB, THE NUMRfcR IS
THF "INIHI" Del ECTTO'' 1.1 m IT
UNITS PARAMtTtH
HG/L CY AN IDE
MG/L N1TKA1E-NITK1IE NXTHUUKh
WG/L SULFATE
MG/b Ammdnia
MG/L PURGEARLE 0KGAN1C CAHbUN
UG/L PORUEABLE ORGANIC HALOUfcN
MG/L TOTAL 0KGAN1C CARBON
/? Mr>i "
"O/ll ~'HfcNPlpS UnKfj
UG/L TUTAL ORGANIC HALUGfcN
biOKKX
yo7iO
Oubiu
UO*«b
UV410
OubHo
Ot'*« u
mm
-------
bPHmFSO.BFC IV _
*1Kpns GrpBGIA RESULTS
0,020
0.30VJ
07/30/86 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS 40
data reporting sheet if.
water
iti
31
5AM PI F N^, f 0*r< *)90r> r tvnc w,»-i t 1 * (V
*oup
90 j
PROJECT nn.i Pt>-J0b PRCp^RAm ET,E"FNT| PCPA
SOUPCEI AMERICAN CY&NAMln
cityt milton statei el
STATION I.O.I M*-l 3,Ot 171 ,«0A021
STURtfT STATION p'OI
SAaPbE COt.LECTnM ST»»T PATE/TIME 03/0)/Vb
SAMPLE COLLECTirjH t STOP nATE/TIME On/OO/Ou
COLLECTED BV| RFCETVFD FPU* I
SAMPLE RKC*ri| ijATE/TI <>n/oi)/on REC'P R*j
SEA LEO I
CHEMISTt GKR CHEvjSTt
ANALYTICAL "tTHOuJ
CASK NO, I 111) 0»G SAMPLE M(l| n INORG SAMPLE NO. | ML)
CONTRACT LABORATORY(OPGAtfTC) I
CONTRACT LAhORATijP* (I*'ORG»NTC) 1
REMARK j iv A1' T 0 J A L GRnilA f£V SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIF1KP PY! Ti»B DATA VERIFTEri PY« GKR
•••REMARKS***
H-OUALITY CMNTkni IWI'ICMFS THAT n*T» ARE UMJSEAbLE
R-CflMPOUKD "AV OP MAY Mir BF PRESENT
R-RESAMPLlNG AND REanALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES###
•A-AVfcRAGt VALUE *«Jl-NnT ANALYZED «NA I-INTERFERENCES
•.1-ESTlMATtn VALUE •N-PRESUMPTTVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• K-ACT'lAt, VAl.UE IS known TO fl£ LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN
• Ii-ACT"At VALUE is K'ii]I"N rn PE GPEATER than VAlUF given
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS
THK n^TtCTTOK' M"IT
UNITS PARAMfcTEH
MG/L CKANIDE
MQ/L N1TKA1E-N1TR1TE NITtUHiKH
*Q/h SULFATE
MG/L ammonia
mg/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CARBON
HG/L PURUEARLE ORGANIC HALOGEN
MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
"G/ "
I'G/L ftibNObS 1*AaP)
UG/L TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
olUKtl
OO/ifO <
.UUOJO .
001Mb
oooio (
0001*0
rtli
I
(
<
{
<
(
<
I
i
» (
(
-------
. XA+trtK A-n awkww».r jrmr» n
>(>«.rsn,PFC /v
ATMEf'S GFpPGI A RtSULT*
0,01 U
2**
07/30/86 SPFCTFTEn ANALYSIS 4«
rtATA REPORTI*>G sheet u.3«
V'*TEP 0-10U
15
\b
T.'Tr v • r typej
i r>U
21)
PROJECT NO I flb-3f>h PP(1GB#«. E!.rvCMTt PCBA
Sourcet amehicam cv»nahid
Cifyi mTltjm statf» ft,
ST^Tinm I.ti.J i' -»"7o,ul 1 02, Kfl«O0?
STO»ET SI IT ION wn»
SAMPLE COLbFCTlHN! <5T*ht DATt/U?.r C3/03/R6
SAMPLE COlL^CTl.i.ji si'iiP nATf./ TT"r On/OO/O0
COLT.ecteo ^yj crrKTvrr fpo««
SAMPLE RFC"M 1> #tF/tT •|i/<>i'/On REC'O PY!
SEALED!
CHE-*1STI gap C<,F"IstI
ANaLYTCA', nfTHUDl
case no. « mi opc; sample ffii p i norg sample rrn.: md
CONTRACT LAHliRATilPY COPGAnTC) I
CONTRACT l,AB(IPATilRyfT''OP(;»Nlcil
REMARK | MAlIuMAl. GHnllwn-iATER SURVEY
REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VEPIEIEU H*« TPH r>»T» VERIFIED P>« GKH
•••PEMARKS»««
•••FOOTNUTES»«»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NR-MoT ANALYZED »NAI"INTERFERENCES
•J-ESTTMATEO VALUE •N.PflFSNMPTTVF FVTDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
• •(-actual value is known to he lfss than value given
•t-ACTUAL VALUE is KNi)Wt; TO J»E GREATER THA* VALUE GIVE"
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 0I1T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS
th*: mx.jjmuu detecriofl t,x«it
• HESUliTSa.o.*
U»1ITS PARAMhTfcH
MG/L CYANIDE
"G/L NITKATE-NlTKllC NITHUUth
*G/L SULFATE
MG/L AMMONIA
MG/L PURGEABliE ORGANIC CAKUUN
HG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC HALUGfcN
MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARSON
"C/t. " 1' ( " J "•
HG/Ij FHSNMljj
UG/L TUTAL ORGANIC HALOGEN
t
, l UKfcl
00 I/O
OUOJU
yu»«b
00610
uuoeu
IHlUfl "
ii 1 ->0
-------
5A^f.r srsve- i
f »*-rs'Vtg iv
^THFNS GEORGIA Rfc.5UI.TS
0,01 u
07/30/tl* SP'CTFlEn ANALYSIS 2&0*
oat* rfpobting sheft v.o
water 0.10U
ttOo
17
G f ** r* i i? r% • Q e *• 4 Q * * ¦ r* • i. i * «.>
• u * * • ¦ . • « I'
1 TU
i?UO
PROJECT hO-f 86-306 pOlJGHAn ET.EVFNT! RCPA
50URCEt AKEPICftf; rx4i,«Nito
Cityi hilto* statei fl
5TAtICM 1,0,1 **».-21,i3U'»3»MQ*Oo3
STORET 5T»riOf! '10 J
SAMPLE CULLFCTTifU START IATK/xImF 03/o3/«6
SAMPLF COLLFCTinfii STOP r»Tg/TT«f "0/00/00
COLLECTED 0Vj P ECE TV Fo K"U 11
SAMPLF REO'Dt i>«tf/tIo°/')i)/oo BFC'ri ky:
SEALED|
Chc*»xst« gkr rnrMisTj
ANALYTIC A! M t T H n L) I
CASE mo, i hi j upg sa*plf Mni n rNriRC- sA'-n.k; no • v,u
CONTRACT I.AftOPfcTnoj (0"G&|'ITC) l
CONTRACT I,APO«ATnRY (INO<»GAnTC ) J
REMARK I NATJnr'AL fiHPUf'0»HTEP SllPVrY
remark I
SAMPLE LOR VEPIFIFO qYf T«SH n»Tft VFKIFIFri DYI GKw
##«REMAp«S-»<*
~••FOOTNOTES#**
• A-AVERAGfc i/ALUE »fJA-NOT ANALYZED «N A I-JWTFRFEPENCES
#J-ESTi*ATEI> VALUF #«J-PSFS')«PTTVr EVjOENCt, OF PRESENCE UF MATERIAL
•k-acTuai. value ts k^own to pe lfss than value given
• L-ACTUAt. value is Kf.QWN JO PE G»EATER THAN VAt UE riV£N
•U-MATERJAL «fAS ANALYZED FOR B"T POT OETECTKD, THE N"MRER IS
THF. Ml^X^UM DETECT I"*i TJI"IT
UNITS PARAMfcTfcH
MG/L CYAwILiE
"G/L NITRAlE-NlTRITE NlT*UG/L PURGEAHLE ORGANIC HAbUOtN
•"ti/'i TUTAL ORGANIC CARHUw
• i./ . " •' J " „
UG/L triEWOLS («AaP)
UG/L TUTAL OKGANiC HALOGEN
ai'uhe.1
oo/au
UUOJU
00**!i
U0610
00b«u
ji 7 iu
<
(
I
-------
f 4"*i.r.ni.* wt .tra^t'
KP«.Mn,P EC rv
» rMfff s G'OORIA
07/30/86 SP»XTFTrr> ANALYSIS
RATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
PROJECT NO.I 06-JO6 PROGRAM ?».E>«FNTl RCPA
SOURCEl AMERICAN CYiN»«IQ
CITY I mTlTUN STATEI "L
STATION ItU,| J10,*0**10
STORET STATION nO«
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START nATfc/TI#*" CJ/05/86
SAMPLE CULliECTIOM t STJP HiTE/TTHP "O/On/Oo
COLLECTED HYf RECEIVED KROM!
SAMPLE REC ' f> I DAT^/Tl "E OO/OO/nn HEC'D H YI
SEAIibOt
CHEMI5TI (jKn CHE'-'lSTt
ANALYTICAL "fcTHHOf
CASE NQ.I 1111 ijnG S»"PLF «CI« P INriRG SA"PtE Mn.l mu
CONTRACT LABORATORY C()«r.A»;&
0.10U
0.10U
1,0"
SUMPTf 40#| SV'*".' T YT m'»w 1«>"
l'UJ
S,UU
~~•FOOTNOTES#**
•A-AVEPAGE VALUE »MA-HO* ANALYZED «NAI-IVTERFERE"CES
•J-ESTIMATEO VALUE *N-PRES"HPTTVr EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•k*actual value is known to be less Than value giv^n
•L-ACTUAI, V4L"F TS KNOWN TO RE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U"iH»TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR PUT NOT OETECTED. THE NUMBER Ts
THF MIW1HU" HETgCTT t)n LIMIT.
• •*««AWJILrlrC4L ftEStlLTtf*«*««
UNITS PARAMETER
CIAMUE
MG/L NITKATE-NITKIIE NlTHUfct*
MG/L SULFATE
MG/L AHM0N1A
MG/L PURGEABLE ORGANIC CAHBUN
HG/L PURCEABLE ORGANIC HALUUtN
MG/L TOTAL 0HGAN1C CARBON
'•Q/~ CHl.ORlDh
•l(,/L PHFUOLS 14Aai-j
MG/L TUTAL OKCANIC HALOGEN
-------
07/30/86
rt>n-rsr<,"l!:G TV
• turns gfopgia
SPECIFIC ANALYSIS
PATft RFpOpTXMG 6HEFT
vi*TEB
Sf-TLF S6'*I?2,5J
"fcSUIil'S
0,01 U
2.8
o.inu
0.10U
Sn
1 .011
1«'M'
till
b"
UNITS KAHAMfcTfcH
M«/L CYANI0E
Mli'L NlTKAIE-NlTHirE NiTKUvifcw
"011 1S>MUAOtATe/"rl*F 03/06/Hft
SAMPL*" COLLFCTjrujj stop PATs/TTMp no/00/00
COLLECTED «Y: RFCSTVEO (•'RU'- J
SAMPLE REC'ni dstE/tike oi/oo/o« »F.r'D kkj
SEALEOf
CHEMISTI GKB CHEmIST!
ANALYTICAL METhUDj
CASE NO, I 11 J 1 U"G SA«PLp *"Jt P
CONTRACT L A"0"ATOP Y(ORGA'JIC) S
CONTRACT I.*nOPATOHY( P'UBflAMCl !
REMARK J NATIONAL ^Rnu«l|)M tTK" SDPV^Y
REMARK!
TNOtif; SAWPLt Nil. J Ml)
SAMPLE LOG vkRIFIFD HY| Tin
•••PEMARKS»*»
PATA V^PTKItP «Y| GKE
•***•*«*••»*****»**»*»*»•«•«¦»•#»••«»••»#•••••#••*•~»•«»~•••»•~»»
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE
•J-FSTIMATEO VAU'F
• NA-NOT ANALYZED »i»AI-IMTERFKRtNCf:S
• •i-PRFS'lMPTTVF EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE UF t'ATtPlAL
•k-actual value ts known to pf lpss than value givfn
•L-ACTUaI, value IS KNOWN TO Bg GREATER THA<" VflLUF. GlVfjr
•U-WATERIAL "AS ANALYZED FOR b"T NOT DFTECTED. THE
THF PETfTT'J*' M*tT
TS
-------
e»*-*:sn. PRC IV
ATMFTtjS GFqPGIA RESULTS
U.2R
O.HO
U7/30/86 SPECIFIC ANALYSIS 0.2
DATA REPORTING SHEET 1.0
W*TEP 1?
SA"PT.E ND.t C6C1?2o/0CI/0(>
COLLECTED HY: PErETVFO FRO«:
SAMPLE REC'Pl 0*TE/TI«E nn/no/OO PEC'P t> * I
SEALED1
CHEM1STJ GKr CHE*ISTJ
ANALYTICAL MtTHnp,
CASE No.» lilt OPG SiMPLP N"l r» INOHC SAMPLE Nn.t HD
Contract LAHORAToPYtoRG»Nic)j
CONTRACT LABORATORYtINORGANIC!J
REMARKi NATIONAL GROUND*ATER SURVEY
BEMARffj NOT AVAf.YZen Td HnL^IWG TfMF FXCEFD^O
^MPLF LOG VERIF£ED ryj THB OAtA VERIFIED PYl G*R
•••remarks#**
•••FOOTNOTES***
• A-AVESAGE VALUE »N A»N(JT A N >LYZED »NAI-INIERFEPfcVCES
•J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PREStiMPTTVF FVJOENCE OF PRFSFnCE OF VATERJAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LfSS THAN VALUE GIVFN
•l-actual value is known m he greater t«an valuf given
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FPR HUT NPT DETECTED, THE NUMBER TS
THE Minimum DETECTT0'! M^IT
UNITS PARAMfcTLR
NG/L CYANIDE
*G/L N1TBAIE-N1TK11E NXTHUttK*
«*G/L SULFATE
«G'L AMMONIA
«G/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
MG/L CHLORIDE
"G/L PHENYLS 14 AAP)
oIUMfcl'
vo'/au
UUOJU.
ooV4b
OUblu
UOb«U
0UV4U
iilSV
-------
A**Ai.rni* "anagevght sv5tcm
p;pA.Fsn,»rc tv
ATHR«5 G^O&GIA
07/30/86 SPECIFIER ANALYSIS
DATA REPORTING SHEET
WATER
is INORG SAMPLE tjn.j «D
contract lapopatorycopganioi
COUTH»CT I.APOP ATuRY ( IMORGAN IC1 I
REMARKS NHT10NAL GROUNDWATER S'IPVFY
REMARK J
sample log verified byi t*h data verified iyj nun
•••rE"ARKS«»«
R-OUALITY CliNTKOL INDICATES that n at a ARK UfcUSEAnLi
R-COMPOttNO MAY HP MAY NOT BE PRESENT
R-RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•••FOOTNOTES"*
**r*!iEBAGe VALUE •NA-Nnr AN' LYZED •KAI-INTFRFtRENCES
•J-ESTlMATED VALUE •«.PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PHFSENCE OF material
vALl'E IS KNOWN TO BE L^SS THAN VALUE GIVEN
•L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERTAL WAS ANALYZED FOR B"T NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER Ts
THP MIMIMUM PETECTIO" ll^lT
PfcRULTS
UNITfi
0.U4
mg/L
0. JOU
67U
Mti/L
*G/L
".15
MG/b
0.1 OU
bft
mg/l
MG/L
34
MG/L
4 5 V/
•o
inuR
I'ti/L
2S0
I'G/L
PARAMETER
CYANIDE
N1TKA1E-N1TKIIE NITKUiifch
SULFATE
AMMONIA
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CAKBUM
PUR0EA8LE ORGANIC HALiOULN
TUTA' OHPANiC CAKBOrt
1 Mlt . • • •-
PHENl'LiS HAA^J
TUTAL 0HGAN1C HALlIGLN
SiUKfcl
00/ *U
UUO JU
OOV«b
OU610
006HU
0 '' V 4 v
J/ / JU
-------
APPENDIX B
DESIGN DRAWING
DEEP WELL EQUALIZATION BASIN
-------
Tot 4.4 UPC
— - •'fo
T- IJHC*r£jJLg*. J**c ,
,' f*0..,
/£
____jL__
poueie L>*r* stcrio*}
0° Ju. JS
l/&sr~
4 "s*r£. jr*
~c/S £*¦ 4C. Si o
Sot** 7np£—t* £t. «r* **£y
MtO€*S* /*JO* t-fj
u£»t o*r4*r»K
cY*fi*Mmny
48
¦ j-rm - Qer*ij
s&cno'/^
A/C _>t-"X
-------
APPENDIX C
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
-------
SPPPY
izRiGnr/ou
-40
i ¦ >;• .•«
' -
iii.:- ¦ V- : /S-
• mvr
if '
TO00F
r* fKOOi/cr/
;^v/v:=!:-
WV~:• ¦ >> -
•TfcSS?" *•-
|S?Sv''"-
Q#/6/Df)L srar/c vMrE/? level fnarE
sf/uD c*? p&eDOM/vajun.y S0/JD
CLAY O# PZEOOM/JUPVTLY C£GV
ro ro ro
Zru of well
TOP OF PPOOUCHOjU ZOJJE
0
1
/500
i
3000
i
scm e /u F££r
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, SANTA ROSA PLANT
i?
%
*
Hj
Nj
J*
is
!
*
£
*
$
I
I
*--/?o
FIGURE H-1
KD'I
-------
APPENDIX D
HYDROLOGIC GRAPH
WATER LEVELS IN RCRA WELLS AND PROCESS WELL NO. 4
-------
N)
V*
4
*
*
§
§
&
!
Vi
<10-
50-
?»-
fO-
O-
-/O-
-?o-
(PCF/7 MOV/rOZ
WELL eo
-juorE
WarE/Z LEVELS /V
xczp MO/u/roje wells
2/ S se /?£-/7cr //js?
S/M/LPt? M/7/S/JE/?.
kCk P MOAJ/'
WELL /•?
PROCESS WEZL
-------
APPENDIX E
STATISTICAL COMPARISONS
GROUND WATER DATA
-------
SA2TTA *OSA DEE? VEIL CROCflVA"?.
CSMTAftlSOS Of "I^ST "EAR VITH '_oT -"lA.3.
V?0 ?JOl
:cw;;.u
1.9 SI
¦ 3 2
19 i 3
.'-•3
•-H3
?i-V.METE?.: -rf
WELL 1?
¦JT._ ?
veil : ;
-ELL 22
-T-L. -
MEAN
5.22
5.02
5.17
5 *5
: .30
5.4 7
.H
53
*
standard dt.-:a::cm
o.:i
0.35
0.35
0 06
o.:o
0.1C
NORMAL DIST.
fSTD.DEV./MEA.-,".
' 0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
3. CO
o.o:
MEA.N T!lAi uor.o maxe
stvdent t-vaii;: SIGNI-
FICANT a: .01 LEVEL
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
sttdexi t-valite
¦1 .397
1.4(52
Mil
•>.513
2.411
(.01 LEVEL INTERIM
STATUS)
s:c:n:!CA.sT'
2.660
2.660
2 . *>60
2 .660
2.660
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
Fa^STZA: s?£c:fic
conduct a.nce
MEAN 23.38 46.25 94. SO -25.00 31.75 63.75
N
52
4
4
U
4
i,
STANDAAD DEVIATION
4.06
0.50
0.53
4 .08
23.37
0.50
SOIWJ. DIST.
(STD. DEV./MEAN)
0.17
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
MEAN THAT 'J0VL2 MAKE
STUDE!."! T - V ALl"E SIGNI-
FICANT AT .01 LEVEL
23 . 34
">8 «i
:?. co
34 .
23.3'-
s~TE:rr t-vallte
11.153
34.692
150. '-1
7"2.05
19.68T
(.01 level interim."
STATUS)
SIGNIFICANT?
2.660
2.660
2.560
2.660
2.660
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
PARAMETER: TDC
~
MEAN
0.29
0.10
3.82
2.77
172.50
0.97
N
52
•*
i.
4
4
STANDARD DEVIATION
0.42
0.12
0. 39
0.45
2.33
0.39
NORMAL CIST.
(STD.DEV./MEAN)
1 .47
1.15
0.10
0.16
0.01
0.40
MEAN THAT '-O'.U MAZE
STVDDTT t-valce sicrr-
FICA.YT AT .01 LEVEL
0.35
3.37
0.37
1.25
0.27
STUDENT T-VALCE
-0.375
16.218
11.323
47'.53
3.155
(.01 LEVEL nCIBXM
STATUS)
SIGNIFICANT?
2.660
2.660
2.660
2.660
2.660
NO
YES
YES
YTS
"IS
PARAMETER: TCX
MIAN
29.33
"6.10
23. :0
2C. 7 5
3.'. 00
10. *:
N
s:
i
u
.
.
STAIHaRD 3E7IATICX
32.34
9. 57
" 4 . 51
5.n
V63
2 a4
NORMAL DIST*.
(std.oet./mean)
1.10
0.26
. 0.19
0.23
^. 29
0.26
MEAN THAT U'OULD MAKE
STUDENT T-VAL'JE SIGNI-
FICANT AT .01 LEVEL
72.37
72. 79
72. 30
- - : -
STCDSNT T-VaLLT
0. ¦» 3 5
-0.360
- j. :;¦>
o.:::
-. . 1 - 2
(.01 LEVEL INTERIM
STATVS)
s &gni : i v^Arrr ?
2.660
2.160
2.-nO
:.
2 .i*0
SO
NO
NO
¦:o
NO
%-2-Z
-------
APPENDIX F
STATE MEMO REGARDING GROUND WATER DATA
-------
REGULATION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I have revelwed the subject response dated October 8, 1985 to our
Incompleteness letter of September 10, 1985. The following comments are
provided for your information:
Item 2. Neal Sharitz states that "Analysis of samples from monitoring well
it22 was not the results of the RCRA regulated surface impoundment. The
•contamination was the result of a spill....approximately 200' NVJ of #22 well
on May 5, 1983. The spill was a non-hazardous solution of 10% NaSCN and
water."
It is apparent that NaSCN, CN, SO,, TKN, TOC, TOX and Na are present in
elevated concentrations in MW-22 and slightly elevated in PW-4. MW-21 is
also showing elevated concentrations for these parameters. But, other
compounds related to the regulated pond are also showing significant
elevations in concentrations (i.e. acrylonitrile, BSPN, and phenols).
It is quite possible that the May 5, 1983 NaSCN spill is influencing
wells MW-22, MW-21 and PW-4. But the constituents also indicate hazardous
waste influence. The puncturing of the liner by the aeriator and the other
liner leakage in the recent past is the likely cause of this influence.
Item 3. The October 8 response does not correspond to water level
measurements provided on recent lab analysis reports. MW-19 is north of the
impoundment and surface elevation is relatively flat (for a distance of 1600
ft, MW-19 to MW-20, the difference in elevations is approximately 12 feet).
Ground water elevations were reported to be 30.59 ft. NGVD in MW-19 and
30.41 ft NCVD in MW-20.
Previous water levels show MW-19 had slightly lower water elevations
than the more southern RCRA wells. Since this area is relatively flat and
higher surface elevations are to the east and west, I believe the water
level in this area will actually be a subdued replica of surface
topography. In~othe"r words, to the east and west water levels should be
higher. The flat area between MW-19 and the other RCRA wells probably
- perches water flowing from the plant (west) and from the higher area to the
east. The gradient would be relatively flat in this .case-, then would drop
off just south of the "Spill and Storm Water Containment Pond".
row routing to other than tmc aooresscc
Tot .
To. ,
William E. Kellenberger
Michael S. Kennedy
November 14, 1985
RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Plan, American Cyanamid Company,
Santa Rosa County
-------
Memo To:
'F-romc
Date:
W.E. Kellenberger
M.S. Kennedy
November 1^ 1985
C
Table 1.
American Cyanamld Co.: Quarterly and Semiannual Monitoring Reports
Submitted October 21, 1985
RCRA
Well Numbers
MW-19
MW-20
MW-21
MW-22
PW-4
Parameters
CN
NaSCN
Acrylonitrile
BSPN
Nitrate
Sulfate
PH
Mn
BDL
<0.5 ppb
<10
2.77
0.0
5.1
BDL
<0.5 ppb
<10
3.87
14.0
5.3
0.03
1.0 ppb
<10
14.88
110
5.4
0.10
67 ppb
<10
<0.02
940
6.0
BDL
3.5 ppb
<10
0.79
26
6.3
Fe
Conductivity
TKN
TOC
TOX
phenols
Na
40
0.00
1.9
29
3 ppb
1.7
93
0.01
6.20
48
<1 ppb
13
425
6.65
4.0
520
<1 ppb
36
2500
80.6
148
3710
45 ppb
585
133
5.65
6.0
23
3 ppb
22
Results In mg/1 except pH and AN
Table 2. American Cyanamld: Monthly Quadruplicates
for Acrylonitrile in MW-22
Sample
1
2
3
4
July 15, 1985
64
67
62
74
August 13, 1985
83
82
96
110
September 18, 1985
68
51
77
53
*AN
71.67
66.67
78.33
79.00
Results in ug/1
*AN -5>i + N2 +
x/M = 71.67 - 78.83
AN _ AN
x£, - 66.67 x£ - 79.00
AN AN
-------
APPENDIX G
STUDENT'S t-TEST FOR ACRYLONITRILE
-------
«touu iu;
From:
Date *.
w.t. Kellenberger
M.S. Kenne(
November 14, 1935
Table 3. American Cyancraid Co. Student's t-test
for Acrylonltrile In MW-22 vs MW-19
XA.. at MW-19 assumed 0.5 ug/1
AN
x/.. at MW-22 =* 71.67 ug/1
AN
at MW-22 = 66.67 ug/1
x£, at MW-22 = 78.33 ug/1
AN
xl at MW-22 = 79.00 ug/l
AN
*22" JL+ ¦¦¦¦*! ' 73'92 -8'1
S19 = 0
s22 ^ /(71.67-73.92)2 + (66.67-73.92)2 + (78.33-73.92)2 + (79-73.92)2
S22 * /(5-0625) + (52.5625) + (19.4481) + (25.8064)
;22 •/
34.293167
S22 " 5*86
73.92 - 0.5
t* =
(3) (5.86)2 + (3) (0)2 (Q5)
6
73.42 = ,,
2.93
tc - 3.143
t* > t_ therefore, there Is a significant increase of Acrylonltrile in
Monitoring well MW-22. _
-------
APPENDIX H
CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING
CONTAMINANT SOURCE AT RCRA BASIN
-------
cr
CYAN AMID
/£, r- A"? - iex-oc x
American Cyanamid Company
Fifcers Division
Sana Rosa Plant
l6Ci Cyanamid Road
Viiron. Fla 32570
Te: .904)994-53M
October 8, 1985 RECE'VCD
OCT - 9 (985
Kr. Thomas W. Moody, P.E.
Special Programs Supervisor **w»m
Northwest District
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
160 Governmental Center RECEIVED
Pensacola, Florida 32501
Dear Mr. Moody: OCT 14 1985
Re: FLD057 231 821 Hazardous Waste
H057-106774 Hazardous Waste
Submitted herewith is information responding to the
"Incompleteness Items" listed in your letter of September 10, 1985
regarding reference.
ITEM 1 CONTINGENCY PLAN
Attached please find revised pages 1-5, 1-5.1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1,
A-l, A-2, A-3 and B-l of the Part B Contingency Plan which respond
to the items noted incomplete. Please replace or add these pages
to our July 15, 1985 Contingency Plan.
ITEM 2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
The groundwater contamination indicated by the analysis of
samples from Monitoring Well #22 was not the result of the RCRA
regulated surface impoundment. The contamination was the result of
a spill occurring in an operating area located ~v-'2001 Northwest of
#22 Well on May 5, 1983. The spill was a non-hazardous solution
of ^10% sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN) and water. I refer you to
correspondence between Cyanamid and the Department of July 3, 1984
Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 17, 1984, T. W. Moody to K. N.
- - Sharitz and August 1, 1982+, K. JL. Sharitz to T. W. Moody. This
correspondence is attached for your convenience. In addition, T
have tabulated the analytical data available on NaSCN from sampling
Wells #20, 21, 22 and 4 since November 1981. This data demonstrates
that the contamination of #22 WelL occurred during May 1983 which
coincide with the non-hazardous spill event of *lay 5, 1983. Other
groundwater data also supports our conclusion that the contamination
was the result of plant operations and not the RCRA surface impound-
ment; i.e., comparison of surface impoundment wastewater character-
istics to groundwater characteristics.
THE CRFATM fi?
-------
Mr. Thomas W. Moody -2 October 8, 1985
ITEM 3 (ITEMS COMPLETE, BUT CLARIFICATION SUGGESTED
3. a. Groundwater flow - The two flow directions in the Part B Appli-
cation should have specified the two systems they represented.
The first system represents the groundwater flow at the surface
impoundment (0.21 Ft/Day North). The second system is repre-
sentative of the general plant site (2.17 Ft/Day South). These
flow velocities were calculated using water table levels in
wells at the surface impoundment (North flow direction) and
wells located further North and South, near the shore of
Escambia Bay, for general site flow velocity (South flow di-
rection) . The different flow directions appear to be the
result of three factors influencing the flow rate and
direction of groundwater. These factors are:
A. A difference in elevation of ^ 75 feet over a distance
of 1600 feet from the surface impoundment to the South;
B. A generally flat topography to the North of the surface
impoundment; and,
C. Possibly, localized leaky aquifer system drawdowns due to
a process well location at the surface impoundment and
a; 3200 feet to the North.
3.b Due to the influence on groundwater flow through the pumping
of #4 well, the intended downgradient monitor wells # s 20, 21
and 22 are monitoring water movement towards #4 Well under the
surface impoundment site rather than groundwater moving away
from the surface impoundment. Therefore, monitoring the sur-
face impoundment impact on groundwater is evaluated by compar-
ing the upgradient Wells #19, 20, 21 & 22 to #4 Well. The
regulations state that the upgradient wells must be compared
to the downgradient wells statistically, which we have done.
3.c The citation of 40 CFR 264.228(b)(2), requiring that the leak
detection system be maintained and monitored in accordance with
264.222,is a requirement of post closure. Since the closure
plan provides for the removal of the total impoundment liner
system, and site decontamination, this requirement is not
applicable. The leak detection system is monitored and main-
tained while operating the facility and will not be discon-
tinued until approved by closure permit issuance.
-------
-ZEST CYAMAJWJZ*
-------
CYANAMiO
American Cyanamid Company
Fidcs Division
Santa Sosa Plant
18C1 C>anamid "cafl
M«ltcn. rla. 3257C
Tel. (204)994-521:
July 3, 1984
Mr. William Kellenberger
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
160 Covemnental Center
Pensacola, Florida 32501
Dear Mr. Kellenberger:
1) Re f. HT57-68241 daced November 23, 1983
2) Letter, Mr. R. V. Kriegel to K. N. Shariti dated
November 16, 1983
As discussed during your visit to Santa Rosa on May 3, 1984, we are
herewith subc-.it:ir.g the following Monitoring Reports required by Reference
1 for Monitor Wells 019, #20, 021 and 022 and Water Supply Well 04:
Quarterly Monitoring Reports- 6ch Quarter 19S3, 1st and 2nd
Quarters 1984
Serri-Annua 1 Monitoring Report - 1st and 2nd Quarters 1984
In addition to the permit monitoring reports sbo.ve, we are submitting
(1) weekly analysis of Wells 04, #20, #21 and 022 per Reference 2; (2) monthly
analysis of wells 019, *20, 021 and *2^ (November 1981 through May 1984) anc
(3) Drawing SK3-13529 water level data relating Wacer*Supplv Well 04 to Moni-
tor Wells 019, 020, 021 and 022.
Cur review and analysis of this data resulted in the following cor.clu-
1. No. 4 Water Supply Well is the only down gradient well in the deep
well impoundment monitoring systen, i.e., Mor.icor Wells 019, 020,
021 and £22 are upgradient. This is documented by water level data
and the physical location of the Monitor Wells portrayed in SKB- 12 529 .
Prior to October _1983, 04 Water Supply Well" was operated at 600 ± gpa-
Since then water production has been limited Co 200 ± gpm.
2. Contamination indicated in 022 Well is a re-sult of plant operations
occurring before May 1983. _ __
3. Water production froa 04 Well has contained or confined this contam-
ination (Wells #20 and #21 contain no NaSCN).
stcr.s
-------
asm C YANAiWD
\JP
-2-
4. Contamination is noc due Co deep well impoundment liner failure
based or. analytical results, water level in wells and plant
operating records.
5. The deep well impoundment was removed front service October 13, 1983.
A double liner with leak detection system was installed and the im-
poundment returned to service February 14, 1984. ;.'o significant chang-
in groundwater quality or water levels were associated with outage.
We will continue our monitoring efforts in compliance with the references
cited and continue operation of #4 Water Supply Well to contain or confine
contamination around #22 Monitor Veil.
This submission ar.d any past or future comunication on this natter is net
intended to admit any liability or to waive or affect any rights.
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this natter, please call.
Sincerely,
xnji^p
K. N. Sharitr, Manager
Environmental & Special Projects
/be a
At tachrnent
-------
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
,eoe graham
NORTHWEST DISTRICT - covianoh
160 GOVERNMENTAL CENTER \lW's3Jl. irtiu ;f' VICTORIA J. TSCMINKEL
p'msacola. Florida 32501-5794 \ / secretary
ROBERT V. KRlECEt
DISTRICT MANAGER
July 17, 1984
Mr. K. N. Sharitz
Environmental & Special Projects
American Cyanamid Company
Santa Rosa Plant
1801 Cyanamid Road
Milton, Florida 32570
DearMr. Sharitz:
This letter is in response to your submission of ground water
monitoring data by letter dated July 3, 1984.
A preliminary review of the data indicates that Conditions «*8, #15, and
021 of the T.O.P. HT57-68241 have been violaced since the contamination
noted in Well £22 was not reported in a timely manner and an
explanation of probable cause and corrective action have not been
provided.
The concentration of acrylonitrile has been analyzed and reported as
"less than" .2 ppm. The U.S. EPA's manual SW846 shows the detection
linir at .5 micrograms/liter.
The ground water assessment program submitted by American Cyanamid's
letter dated October 14, 1983 must be continued. The addition of well
023 does not, given the additional data concerning the cone of
influence of Well #4, leem to be necessary at this time. However, more
information is required on the plume definition and proposed corrective
action to the contamination shown in Well #22.
The T.O.P. should also be modified to reflect the construction and
installation of the double liner system at the equalization basin^
_ -5-tncerely, -
Thomas W. Moody, P.E.
Special Programs Supervisor
TVM/wkf
cc: Rodney DeHan
-------
CYAiMAMiD
American Cyanamid Company Dcrrtum
Fibers Division - KfcEEJVED
Santa Rosa Plant - -
1801 Cyanamid Road AUG 0 *> 1324
Milton. Fia 32570
Tel. (904) 994-5311
fcCRTM*a; f.OHlDA
Del?
August 1, 1984
Mr. Thomas V. Moody, P. E.
Special Programs Supervisor
Northwest District
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation *
160 Governmental Center
Pensacola, Florida 32501-5794
Dear Mr. ticoiy:
Reference: 1) T.O.P. HT57-68241
2) Your letter dated July \Tt j.984
In your July 17, 1984 letter you indicate a DOs<;,-m.
Temporary Operation Permit (Ref. 1) with respect r« 1?.' **0°"/.?! °Ur
*21 concerning contamination observed in monitor J™1"!? ' f15.and
cited concerned not reporting contamination in a t$Z 1 _ „ violation
viding an explanation of probable cause and cornr.^/ r-j"ner ana
not pro-
cn.
, f? Ti,JUly )• 1584 y°U ^ cc=teainacion observed
In veil <122 was froa a sodlirn thiocyanate solut:-,„ ^ occurred ,00.
northwest of well 022 at the solids removal fil«.-s j .
,. , # » _ , , —ir-® spiij. occurred in
April 1983. The contamination was not from the Well -qual3 spill of sodiura thio-
cyanate solution occurred* due to a sump pump fci.-re and/or pipeline plugging
resulting ir. exceeding the capacity" of the su.fr *r.d spill containment dikes
around the solids removal filter and tankage.
| nc-xc
-------
CYAMAMtD
Mr. Thonas W.-Moody
August 1, 1984
Page 2
The corrective action initiated to contain the contaminated groundwater
at well *22 was to maintain pumping of $U production well. This pumping
creates a cone of depression and draws the contaminated groundwater into well
#4. Containment of the contaminated groundwaters is indicated by #21 Monitor
Well data, i.e., no sodium thiocyanate detectable.
Preventive measures taken included additional operator surveiller.ee, re-
vised operating procedures and maintenance attention to the solids removal
filters facility. Additional containment capacity in the form of a new catch
basin to collect and contain any liquids exiting the solids removal facility
is in progress.
Your July 17, 1984 letter also pointed out a difference between the
acrylonitrile detection limit we «j#ere using versus U.S.E.P.A. guidance. Ve
have now purchased the equipment recommended to achieve this level of detection.
Upon satisfactory implementation by our laboratory personnel, we will analyze
to the lower detection level.
The groundwater quality assessment program outlined in our letter of
October 14, 1933 should be discontinued along with the monitoring requirements
of the T.O.P. we believe as a result of installing a double liner with leak
detection at the Equalisation Basin we-are exempt from Subpart F groundwater
protection requirements, see 47F.R. July 26, 1982,5264.222 pgs. 32357-32358.
We propose to continue groundwater monitoring as outlined in the T.O.P. to
ascertain the adequacy of the corrective measures implemented after the
April 1983 spill. Also in complying with the requirements outlined in
Mr. Kriegel's letter dated 11/16/83, we will continue monitoring for acrylo-
nitrile, sodium thiocyanate and beta sulfopropionitrile cn a weekly basis for
a period of one year, i.e., ftjvember 16, 1984. After this one year period,
leak detection monitoring should be our only requirement.
We also are prepared to submit a revision to our application for a T.O.P.
(Ref. 1), to reflect the double liner installation in the Deep Well Equaliza-
tion Basin. This will be submitted on or before 8/17/84.
This submission or any past or future discussions or communications cr. this
matter are not intended to admit liability or to waive any rights.
If you have any questions, please advise. .7 — —
Sincerely,
K. N. Sharit2, Mana&er^
Environmental-•& Special Projects
/gg
cc: Mr. William Kellenberger, FDEK» Pensacola
-------
7*
i *2
o
J. «>V/»
m
pJh P-
o
¦i »K;t-+*-0(r -- tO
I rt rt n n — — «t <{>
%3$S8SSS?
i ri
fooooooooo
i
*
II
ooooooooo
ss???!??¥3g
• • r i » • i i i
— ct V£\.s5 f KPC
S*2 Si^Orvdr-vac>9 t^c(c{ -^-VotT-^O rt-^O^VflVi} -^r-o — Un^or-^Y«2(Q
fiK^SJSS?!* r5 o*^ r<<
-------
APPENDIX I
SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
-------
APPENDIX I
SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Date:
- Site Name/Case No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
Beg. S/J/Si End 3/3/fe
C. /9¥y//Q d^uajtMor
carter" er Ac.
/fert*v*p a-Vfe
(ytMVic Sue/ /A/atcstvc /Vaami
S?Ii4- A~I
4. Sample Methods
<-// -ST C-tfCo/eV
2lL
6 £cJ 3#"
//
4-.7Z '
2.2*7
jJ&nss.
Bailer
Bladder
Other
Lot No.
Time Beg. ^
Depth Sampled
oJhr&
End S2-
*0
Sample Volume CLf/fsytO 4?
&/r &
General Observations
Notes
Organic Vapors ({Oft}/ OVA, TIP)
2^7 /%k£
fan* fN .&/C&J
Sediment l*f. 5. S/faO
Color Q&L ~
Odor y^.5
6&cu»i£> &ttx#r7*Ai starrer^
O.ol **^Ab
In Situ Measurements
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity^
PH
Turbidity
tr* Z£
2arz/~ /v + rts.
•c
C.2- & ¦ Z—
- _ (Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
PH~
Turbidity
z£
#4
-y/JutfV
• Well Security
P/C C*r?
• Disposal of Purge Water
M 77feT 6/GPi/aj/)
• Nonaqueous Phases //ovt?"
• Dedicated Equipment AJOfls&
• Casing Material
five
Weather Conditions
Other •sWLj CcryTSLrv- "p
tOQ of |-p
» C'*JW^TgS W«^V.
fas// ro+ffr,A (TP ls9&t- "Aar&rs/ TPtene A A*>
+6*A*5 «¦*s&*&
IMsAoL '
&}4
'&>/) -
-------
VERSAR WELL MOJITORI NG SHEET
Date:
Site Name/Casd No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
44#
End 2>
,A/g^
NtH &2P *>cv77/ Uk^rW
nfoWk QUO? TTA/e/tcswh HQ A Do
+Zatrhl ZflTh i A-Z-
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
V*-rV* K 10'"7
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (tHNu) OVA, TIP)
QSfp* Wy '
4. Sample Methods
B8.ST
S3 J
CoW«v~
Bailer
Bladder
Other
Lot No.
• Time Beg.
End V2-10
|ISt>
4^3
#4
5*
5. Notes
Depth Sampled
Sample Volume
<5K0 /CUP
<^C*' O
Well
Th
Sediment
Color
Odor
Security
• Disposal of Purgf Water . -—
0^£gVV6A)
3.
In Situ Measurements
I kr wi-
Nonaqueous Phases _
V-GV4-
(Time)
2 U*o
•
Temperature
VliC^jA^Conduct i vi ty
pH
CZ,
lot)
sjs
61
vco
S~.l&
•
•
jJVs) Turbidifcy
(Time)
3^4"
4 _ ~
—
Temperature
£Z-
~ — ~
*— —
Conductivity
Vert?
— -_
—
*
pH -
" r.i8
_
Turbidity
©41
—
Equipment —
r"*~n -n
Casing Material
- fve
friA^ frafrg -
Weather Conditions
j ^ fcs°F
dve*a4
j
Other ^W^wgi^ vf>g\
•>^/^avw c^Wyly v*w>s. jaHfrW (<^>
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Date: Bag.
Site Name/Case No.
Hell No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
3 3 J6
End 3 3 J4
kwwvi Wf c. iwtiQ.
filloR 4 MQAPQ3 / ?rlTf : A-3
oiqmijl. rhjff>^a*v« c [ J
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
H
4. Sample Methods
/R > ^ ' iCfl' ^y Lot No.
Q ' Tine Beg. I5~IS~ End \S3Z-
Depth Sampled
• Bailer
Bladder
5^ yJHto*
¦( 0 rwix. (jC
2. General Observations
Organic VaporsC^HNv^l OVA, TIP)
O Affm bfyLyrdwJL j" 0 A
VK CKgTl^l AjZch&srtj*.
Sediment K-/tDs-£—¦
30\ 3
• Sample Volume
5Hc/CUP
5. Notes
£(fW~
• Well Security
^feK ; vy
• &^osa^f Purg
Color
Odor
L/is^gdai ul rui^e nowci ~ ^
Mnnarniornic Phaeoe L/ vrv* #
WW.. w-o-
RJWWL »; >-*Av- -iftW
U 0.0 I w4-!w\r ~~ W caS>(+^
Nonaqueous Phases nxrwy n\a^vVfJl.
oy~ r^Jjru^J-aJl
3. In Situ Measurements
(Time) 1 '
Temperature*"
hk« ^^Conductivity
pH
K/flS) Turbidity
2 144 U
(Tijne)
Temperature
Conductivity
pH
Turbidity
0. 11
cz
4^0
SZO
s.&i
, I4*t>
4
6-0
$"2-0
5-7 O
Dedicated Equipment 2^2
f<^> ^
Casing Material JhirUr
cnj+c ^;fVe-
Weather Conditions ^LaA^vV ^ \
-*6>S*F
Other KJO t»V4vg_3 lQfc-£-«j£
p*Tss^eX**iL+ \t0ks\^e^_cA[^3eJl
A>Vv^ fij[ ru>yl
$brtu^ Vy
lt^
^4*\
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Data: B«g. End
Site Name/Casd No. /&W/7C&SJ /ffr/A*S /&. C,
Well Mo./Location O/^ 3,/r
smo Mo./Pae. no. areAaov^ /7//PV /&£./,%, sj/.'/ lfi-4-)
Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
4. Sample Methods
AFT**-
/»' «>*¦" fas')
/z' es~"
r'
3.53 (r/t-fforfS
3 GAfcrt*.
3/ PB&OA' UufSf C^JyJ
Bailer
Bladder
Other
Lot No.
^ime Beg. End /0/j^
££i&7c /& Z.Z. />/37
Depth Sampled
Sample Volume ^LS/ C i- &
2. General Observations 5,
Organic Vapors (HNu. OVA, TIP)
&cJC&&actAb -r /+* we/f
Cs*5&jy c"t//rer ~
Odor 56'6#r AtfS OA*g_
3. In Situ Measurements
(Time) 1
Temperature £T7 P~
Conductivity ?CO Z
pH C,.M
Turbidity B5"B>
Notes
2 /o;/Z-
Co *F
&£L
Yft ?/n>
(Time) 3_
Temperature
Conductivity
PH _
Turbidity
Well Security P\/C- MP . /tfo
LD&k
Disposal o£ Purge Water I
2>o<*\*£Z> art
• Nonaqueous Phases
• Dedicated Equipment A'CA'g"
• Casing Material PV£- C^SelC,
• Weather Conditions f-l
^ /r)/ j—
• Other ¦ ~T~jZAf
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Data: Beg.
3/v/S6>
End
yV/*
Site Name/Cas6 No. /htsrttoA) CvaAa**/£> /1 /fW//6
Well No./Location '/ *£SBB. tArtST" sF ZCliA LAC^Ot^S
SMO No./Pac. No. #tQA CO <>' f 6 l'W 1 / /vKr/sfa St/*'/
f e7#7Er'St>i/r-
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
rfi Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
Qt/i? f ^WSfu/r
4. Sample Methods
7«t>e>'
2.*-. '
7S~ &*t.
?yw
¦ (ske.f'hp*.J
Bailer
Bladder
Other
Lot No.
Time Beg
/y** End /s"
• Depth Sampled
Sample Volume (L/>/$/*b
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors ^HNu^OVA# TIP)
ftocJc 6^00^1^
fbtt£ 3.Jfipfa
Notes
Sediment
Color
Odor
rrc+se:
3.
PAfroAcnvibj — 4 O.o I
In Situ Measurements
(Time)
i ti*°
•
2 nT'
Temperature
Ol"
fcd"* •
Conductivity
"2/Of*
pH
y-9f
Y.?f •
Turbidity
/-**
e.ff *rn>
- - (TirneT
3/J^
4
Temperature
CJ-'r
Conductivity
— 2aSZ>
- PH
s~.y?
Turbidity
ose>
/JfO
Well Security
L<#reX- 0t>j7W /fro***'*'~7~s.
Disposal of Purge Water
ptACJCD LAtk. /yv^> f?C£A
Nonaqueous Phases
s*t,*o
Dedicated Equipment
DtFTMCAftt Ft-cerfifi
Casing Material .
Weather Conditions 5i/AtPy
t~A&n . Cr&~r
Other D,J&7£v/A> jM *0*
fTVa*** A" t/m/c . (TV "£
y/iU*c. {aaj&iJL&ij e^ :
cch. (a*ell S^k fyn-^iv
('51104 4 HQAoot)
-------
irrogMi WELL MQMITORIMG SHEET
Date:
Site Name/Casd Ho.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. Kb.
Well Measurements
Hell Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Rt.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
Beg
&
End
—
AneaeAu C&autMU> / c. /v vvam
,f / frrtt'M Sham p/= tA&an*/ A
4. Sample Methods
• Bailer S"'
Bladder
. , . r N Other
^y-zrJ Lot No.
&r*"-
C^U-
JL
AT
General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
"2. J*** / r* C4£/#f
frrr#
Sediment
^ i 0'°' "*/*'
fitfiroWi lJ C.Of nfi/Ms /*
• _ m * ii ¦ ¦ ¦mi'ftuftnf q
• Time Beg. /O ^ End
• Depth Sampled
• Sample Volume /z/f Ser-A
»W s*7~
y(,+ /B/t iPKuty
Notes
• Well Security ~ 3€Jt&T*J
• Dedicated Equipment A/a/Vdf
" w - —
In Situ Measurements
(Time) 1 /ff.'fiO
Temperature
Casing Material
I ~ ' *
v* Conductivity
pH £12.
Turbidity/1 a//v) .Q.-ff.—
(Time) 3 tf>:30
Temperature .
Conductivity
pH __ jT' ^ -
Turbidity
2 /Oi/fL
'fj£-
Weather Conditions 5u/VArf
71
• F
Other f7&U> Ac*vk U,Af
T*k*. f777Z . XT-X/tt/JJttHOf
*?s/S 66* A £ai>& Af-/
Torbiaity .
VjLu^'v^
-------
ytfPSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Date:
Site Name/Cas* Ho
Beg.
End
yr/M
f - - - ( 9
0yaMSAtt& y t /f¦ ^ ^ ...
Mo./?ie. ho. ..£**,%¦ ,
*• SMpt« MttlwU ¦*>'&&***' "
Wall Diameter (innar)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
A/fi-
/S sarco^O
£*j*GGr
' vAfas:
General Observations
Organic Vapors ^HWu^ OVA, TIP)
aac4:g»ptJAO eA/*Ste
Sediment
Color
Odor
Cte*»e.
Vfl/ue ^*gq=fft/«ei>
In Situ Measurements
c*tw "s/Wsl
Temperature *70
Conductivity
PH
Turbidity
/juto^CAi-
^esl
/.09a7V
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
pH
Turbidity
3 -
Bailer
Bladder
Other &£*LJ
Lot Mo.
• Time Beg. /2- ,S~ End /3
• Depth Sampled
• Sample Volume T~uM Sdv^a. S*Ar 4?
Of <~/ <^lriZh' f
~fz*M Serf-ifa
Motes
• Well Security (aj&JL A/
• Disposal of Purge Water A/*C><£.
lA&7irJ> OA/
Nonaqueous Phases o^Sea»g>
Dedicated Equipment ^V. fc. /tea
71/tTA/AJGT
Casing Material
Weather Conditions
L**XM
Other fA/i/h Sri/uflfe* mjml a/ct-
tfifartm ON 3/t/aL
jfe/w- £>p* y.
ls*>0 Cfa&e w*/W 2*7Via*.
yaftwa. tr/ift. ApenAeO
. 4 .
Mlh
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORIHS SHEET
Date: Beg.
s/sr/sc
End
3^6
W# w # . yr -¦ f
Site Name/Casd No._
Cyme*w**' / t /MSsPfl
..... .. *2V /rc*> i<*** s/~ta/ e* *cr/«r S/n*
Well. Ko./Location t ,
SMO No./Fac. No. />ft?A Ote - G///3
Well Measurement!
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
ill
c' /r"
n' is*
33. £ oa/
4. Sample Methods
Bailer
Bladder
Other
Lot No.
Time Beg. /S2&
Depth Sampled
sf 4 SSc^rAl
End /£&*>
Sample Volume CL£/St*o
Sf/>? '
General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
&4clt6*OLW& /SertQMJfc*
//./to
Sediment A^5" -
Color _____
Odor ^/ASr- & * _
5. Note3
In Situ Measurements
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
pH
Turbidity
i/3*y
i3
fop*-
//. 2>
3 J£l
(Time)
Temperature ^ ^
Conductivity 5^"
pH S-.62.
Turbidity ^-3
> //*»
~S1*Z-
/0.Z-
or
Co - -
>>2-0 M* A*>/
M-?~ htfV
Well Security C+cAg& /*t/*u
f&vex-
Disposal of Purge Water
&L>/»f0eZ> &/J
Nonaqueous Phases /ms/w4 tsue*.
Weather Conditions 5^/vV*V
f.
Other jfafl/ lb CtAtfen*u
te*OucnWy &«***> *js . SAttf/es
/x*3ea*ex> kA/a Or rOMm
fkaM :cr«*t brw- ycd** t*f*A
T7*> m4 e~A*> CoA/lbf*/ * Unr -
m. fit*. isttf **4
N*ScaJ - :
vejbyyr
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SIffiBT
Date:
Site Name/Casfi No.
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
1. Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
Beg.
End
j/M
'sc.
t. /flfP'A'dZ.
AfMAL
+J6///t>
ey»Q AGZ^eyv J3ZL
y"Sr<-
?8.&-k
//.ZY'
/rv/
*3t. j+l
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
Q> 2~ t+jfr
g^fy/V 6- A/'/?o
Sediment Aav<«
Color CLtS7*(2—
Odor PenstjzzZi
3- In Situ Measurements
S3
Jeo.
°F
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity 2-5&
PH Y.S3
Turbidity £?.3S~
2 Z'
»o
UL
O. Ujyikos/CM
S.V2~
/.?3 "TV
CP# £&*&# 3^/'?
Sample Methods
• Bailer
Bladder
Other <&1£S
Lot No.
• Time Beg. r*tD *"?. End
• Depth Sampled
Sample Volume
/"&// e>m + ffrcA /jr k
Notes
Well Security jDer^vy /free-
wteck. pus»S CvS fitter
Disposal of Purge Water m>a *-c
Nonaqueous Phases
pas&z-i/&b
Dedicated Equipment
2 f&l* tSTZ&Sfc-
Casing Material p\fL
Weather Conditions ^
W
Other «/c>7~
tvtjrJC. O^ffO fya/r*
0 2-
Temperature
Conductivity
PH
Turbidity
(Time) 3 ft
ry\
jtwAe/cr*
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
"A4
Date:, Beg. -3
Site Name/Cas6 No.
" Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No.
Well Measurements
Well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Ht.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
t/f
/f/VO /t/Zaur*.3 *s*r»
Sediment /Y0/S&
Color Z.
Odor
End
3/V<3 6
/}*fte/ycaA/ / £ /??*/#&
/hCAws-
VL.fS-'
/Q<
//. at W
f., .iw. ;
Q///S~ s/kesm# /)- f
/Gr& C 3J-
4. Sample Methods
In Situ Measurements
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
pH
Turbidity
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
pH
Turbidity
1 ofcz.
GO °F
/00
7/6
/vsr
2 0f0£_Cer«()
__A£_
ts*
*g3
/*/,*> *n/
Bailer
Bladder
Other //AAiO /V**/-*
Lot No.
Time Beg. & End
Depth Sampled
OfS7>
Sample Volume -furf 3^7
fi,// £7M 5^
Notes
Well Security A//4/*£> du+t/9 tS
C *£.£<&&
Disposal of Purge Water /)csn/>££>
DA/ 7ms-
Nonaqueous Phases
nrz>
A/9/V&
Dedicated Equipment f64/Vp
£**
%
Casing Material /~Vc CSK/*^S
/{Z+vp
Weather Conditions
/fro yp'J
• Other
(4-
XLtuhs/i
'£*
/9.fP a4V
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Dat«:
Site Name/Case No
Well No./Location
SMO No./Fac. No
te: B«5-
1. Well Measurements
^twv\jpN £<\-
well Diameter (inner)
Inner Casing Rt.
Outer Casing Diameter
DTW
Total Depth
Water Column Length
3 Casing Vol
Vol. Purged
2-6
hk
• Bailer
Bladder
L A-W
eg
Other !fev-o4&ih> fou^»
Lot No.
22^7_1
'iV_Sw^j>
r77
• Time Beg. End /
MA
NA
2. General Observations
Organic Vapors (HNu, OVA, TIP)
Depth Sampled flAr jpo^tnvv^, ^2. ^¦ C^uglV-v
Well Security . WO
0 LtTL- »Vx p-tn • Disposal of
Sediment ^w<. \rt-s— ^ c***
I. In Situ Measurements
• Casing Material
(Time) 1030
Temperature
Conductivity IS 3
pH "7« 6B
Turbidity 2. *7.^*
(Time) 3^
Temperature
Conductivity
PH
Turbidity ~
• Weather Conditions *Wsy»yy
cWvj ~ 7-0
1k^Uv>- $% V>a/3<-v4?tt fo^lag^
~~ gt^y J yft. — -¦ -
Cfo*&o~cAr\
*3= &f~ -jz^J fir- dtoj Jjfc-
(QKI1 fMQAoiy
-------
VERSAR WELL MONITORING SHEET
Data: Beg.
Site Name/Cas« No. C^dvv.b\ ^X/KvV
&JL Cl-P s*X
(TV- M8 /
• Well Security
Sediment S(Y>W—
Color ~
Odor < Wz WV cri-fly- f »iv^CT.V- f|^
In Situ Measurements
Disposal of Purge Water
jfv^A
• Nonaqueous Phases ,S'vr?M"tot uv.
L o£50
4oT
• Dedicated Equipment 3ui»Vwa-^sVU^L.
• Casing Material -fj-H
(Time)
Temperature
Conductivity
ph 7 sQ
Turbidity
Weathe
• Other
r Conditions _4m_
y^UA- Icfi
WVvv.
(Time) 3_
Temperature
Conductivity
PH
Turbidity '
"T7y s±.A>rp7ikl
Qab—
-------
APPENDIX J
LABORATORY REVIEW
-------
Qfl/IRDNMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV, Athens, GA 30613
EftTE: June 2, 1986
J&BJBCT: American Cyanamid
FROM: Michael Birch
TO: Don Hunter
Attached is the evaluation of the subject site.
iel Birch
Attachment
-------
INTRODUCTION
Hie onsite and offsite laboratory facilities handling groundwater monitoring
were evaluated at the American cyanamid, Santa Rosa Plant, Milton, Florida on
March 25-26, 1986. Saitples collected for analysis under Subpart F Ground-Water
Mxiitoring are analyzed by American Cyanamid's Environmental Control Laboratory
ar*l the Analytical Development and Process Control laboratory. A contract
laboratory, Pioneer Laboratories, Inc., Pensaoola, Florida also provides ana-
lytical capability. All three laboratories were evaluated regarding their
respective responsibilities under American Cyanamid's groundwater and waste
analysis plan.
Hie following personnel were present during the evaluation of the respective
laboratories:
Michael H. Bir^h U.S. EPA
Neale Sharitz American Cyanamid
Carol Lanthrip " "
E.S. Salter
L.T. McKenzie " "
Faye Bowers Pioneer Laboratories
Paul Canevaro " "
Beverly Vanderstar " "
Csaba Csros " "
Chemist
Superintendent,
Environmental Controls
Supervisor, Environmental
Controls laboratory
Superintendent, Analytical
Development & Process Control Laboratory
Supervisor, Process Control Laboratory
President, Manager
Laboratory Nfanager
Organics Supervisor
Inorganics Supervisor
The purpose of the inspection was to determine the quality of the self-monitor-
ing program and assess the reliability of the data reported by the facility
for 40 CFR Parts 265.92 and 265.94. In addition, the procedures used for
samples collected and split with the facility during the Task Force Study
for Part 265.93 (d) ground water assessment were reviewed.
The laboratory portion of the inspection included:
o Reviewing the laboratories' analytical methods for pH, specific
conductance, total suspended solids (TSS), total organic carton
(TOC), total organic halogen (TQX), chloride, iron, manganese, zinc,
sodium, copper, nitrate, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), cyanide,
sulfate, turbidity, sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN), acrylonitrile, beta
sulfo propion nitrile and phenol.
o Determining whether the laboratories' procedures are followed and
reported in a way that is proper and consistent with 40 CFR Part
265.92 (a) and 40 CFR Part 136, Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures
for Analysis of Pollutants, Federal Register, October 24, 1984.
o Reviewing the facility's chain of custody procedures.
o Assessing the laboratories' sairple handling, preservation and holding
time techniques.
-------
o
Reviewing the laboratories' records for completeness, accuracy and
compliance with the State and Federal requirements.
o Evaluating the laboratories' quality assurance program,
o Assessing the adequacy of the laboratories' facilities and equipment.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. Personnel:
The personnel listed in the introduction provided information pertaining
to staffing, operation, facilities, equipment, and quality control of the
laboratories. The analysts responsible for the RCRA ground water analyses
have from .six months to twenty years of analytical experience. The
analysts appeared to be very competent and adequately trained to conduct
the analyses for the groundwater monitoring.
2. Facilities and equipment:
Each laboratory had ample space which includes sufficient bench space for
processing samples; storage space for chemicals and glassware, and portable
instrumentation; and open floor space for large equipment such as refrige-
rators and incubators, tost of the lab equipment was modern and appeared
to be in excellent working condition. The only exception was the
instrumentation used for the total metal analyses.
The atomic absorption unit used to conduct the total metal analyses in
the Analytical Development & Process Control Laboratory was not equipped
with a digital readout or recorder that would provide adequate sensitivity,
and readability for measuring low levels of trace metals (less than 100
ug/L).
3. Sample Containers, Preservatives and Holding Times:
The facility follows the EPA guidelines for sample containers, preserve- <
tives and holding times for all parameters, except phenol.
a. Ifcenol: Samples are collected in plastic containers.
Regulatory Requirement; Samples for phenols must be collected in glass
containers. See Method 510, Standard Methods; or Table 1, and Method
413.1, EPA Methods.
4. Chain of Custody:
The facility has adequate chain of custody procedures and documentation
for the disposition of samples.
5. Methodology:
The methods in use for the RCRA self-monitoring program were generally
in accordance with 40 CFR Part 265.92 (a) and Part 136 for all parameters.
< Deficiencies were noted for the trace metal procedures conducted onsite
-------
and the Base Neut ral/Acid/ Volatile organic procedures at the contract
laboratory.
References:
1. "Standards Methods" means Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater, 15th edition (1980).
2. "CPA Methods" means Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastewater, March 1983.
The following observations were made during the evaluation:
a. Trace metals (chrcmiun, copper, iron, manganese and zinc): Samples
for trace metal (chromiati, copper, and manganese) are not digested
prior to aspirating the sample into the atomic absorption spectro —
meter. Iron is measured by a non-approved Ehenanthroline Method,
Method 315B, Standard Methods. Reagent blanks are not carried
through the digestion procedure to check for possible background
contamination. Method 315B is an approved method for NPDES self-
monitoring, and should give comparable results, provided the laboratory
uses proper calibration and digestion procedures. The standard
calibration curve has not been verified during the last year.
Regulatory Requirement: Samples for total metal analyses must be
carried through a solubilization procedure prior to the introduction
of the sample to the atomic absorption unit. Digestion Method 4.1.4,
is an approved digestion procedure for the RCRA and NPDES self-
monitoring of trace metals (see METRLS-7, EPA Methods).
Sample digestion of the org inial sample solution for total metals
may be emitted for atonic absorption (direct aspiration or graphite
furnace) and inductively coupled plasma analyses, provided the
sample has a low COD and meets the following criteria:
1. is visibly transparent
2. has no perceptible odor, and
3. is free of particulate or suspended matter after acidification.
See footnote 3, Table IB, Federal Register, \fal. 49, No. 209,
October 26, 1984.
Due to the nature of most voter samples an acid digestion is required
unless comparability data for representative samples are on file to
show that the digestion is unnecessary.
The facility should request an alternate test procedure for the
iron analysis, or use the approved procedure. See Method 236.1 or
Method 236.2, EPA Methods. If the phenanthroline method is used, the
calibration curve must be verified with a minimum of tvo points on -
the curve with each set of samples analyzed and a blank must be
carried through the digestion procedure.
-------
b. Base Neutral/Acid/ Volatile Ocganics: The Contract laboratory uses
approved EPA Methods 624 and 625 for the organic analyses. Daily
GC/MS performance checks are made at the beginning of each day to
verify that acceptable performance criteria are achieved. On several
occasions acceptable performance criteria were not achieved, but the
analyses were continued without the instrunent being properly tuned
for the BFB or the DFTFP as outlined in Method 624, Section 10; or
Method 625, Section 12. This could cause improper identification of
some compounds.
Regulatory Requirement: The Q3/MS must be properly tuned according to
Method 624, Section 10; or Method 625, Section 12, before Jshtf analyzing
the samples.
c. Pesticides: The contract lab hats a well established quality control
procedures for the pesticides/PCB's analyses. Daily QC colunn
performance checks for the breakdown of DDT and endrin are not
conducted.
Suggestion: At the beginning of each run and periodically during
the day DDT and endrin breakdown should be monitored.
The breakdown should not exceed 20% for each compound.
% breakdown for 4,4'-DDT= Total EOT degradation peak area (DDE + DDD)
x 100 Total DDT peak area (DOT-H3DE+ODE)
% breakdown for endrin=
Total endrin degradation peak areas (endrin aldehyde + endrin ketone)
x 100 Total endrin peak area (endrin + endrin aldehyde +endrin ketone)
Quality Assurance and Data Docunentation: - i
The Environmental Control Laboratory and Pioneer Laboratories have esta-
blished quality assurance programs that consists of duplicates, spikes
and references standards to verify the quality of data for each parameter
analyzed. These quality control measures are used bo establish precision
and accuracy control limits for the groundwater analyses. Instrument
calibration records are maintained and temperatures of regulated devices
are checked. All raw data calculations, gravimetric weighings, absorbance
readings, CE and CE/MS performance checks are documented and maintained
on file as required in the State and Federal requirements. Daily operating
conditions and quality control practices are easily reconstructed. The
Analytical Development Laboratory has adequate quality control procedures
for the acrylonitrile and beta sulfo propion nitrile procedures. Quality
control procedures for the trace metals were lacking. Seme additional
quality assurance suggestions that would strengthen the quality of data
produced are:
-------
a. Establish a quality assurance program that consists of duplicates,
spikes and reference standards to verify the quality of data
for each parameter analyzed. Use these data to establish precision
and accuracy data Cor control limits for the space metal.
b. Digest standards or fortified samples periodically for the TKN
procedure to determine digestion efficiency.
c. Conduct and document routine checks of the analytical balances with
class "S" or equivalent weights in the milligram weight ranges encoun-
tered in the gravimetric tests, or \rtien weighing primary standards.
d. Verify spectrophotcmetric calibration curves each day of use
with a. blank and at least one standard at mid-range of the
calibration curve. Daily checks should agree within +/- 10
percent of the original curve or a new curve must be prepared.
Verification data should be recorded and maintained on site with
the appropriate sample data.
7. Performance Evaluation Data:
Hie Environmental Control Laboratory participated in EMR-QA Study 5.
Acceptable data were submitted for pH, TSS, anmonia nitrogen, TKN, nitrate
nitrogen and BOD5. Pioneer Laboratories participated in the study and
had 92.3% acceptable data. Pioneer also participated in Water Supply
Study 17. Acceptable performance was denonstrated for all parameters
except the Trihalomethanes (Purgeable Organics). Performance for the
pesticide parameters were generally acceptable.
CONCLUSION
The facility's groundwater sampling and analysis plan was available for
inspection. The plan states that Pioneer Laboratories conducts all analysis
and EPA approved procedures are used. The contract lab does not conduct the
trace metal analyses, and nonapproved procedures are anployed. The plan - 1
should be updated to reflect actual sampling and analytical procedures used."
Based on the overall findings, the facility appears to be providing acceptable
quality data for all parameters, except phenol and trace metals (copper,
iron, manganese and zinc). The deficiencies noted for the trace metals would
cause the reliability of some of the data to be questionable. The sample
container deficiency for phenol could cause the reliability of seme of the
data to be questionable.
The operation of the GC/MS spectrometer without meeting the performance
criteria would rot render the organic data unusable, considering the other
quality control checks utilized by the contract laboratory. The data could 1
be used for the ground water assessment. Ftowever, the organic data should I
not be used to resolve any controversies should they arise. \
-------
FIGURES
-------
SANTA ROSA COUNTY
LANT
SITE
MILTON
Y
h
• ¦*/ I EAST BAY
GV3^
(AFTER CH2M HILL)
FIGURE 1
FACILITY LOCATION MAP
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
KM
PSOOUCTS
SITE
autT iwia>Titih rifi a
MAIN
PLANT
AREA
m
ST. KGIS PAPEt CUNT AMY
BOO KM
SCALE. M FEET
LEGEND
FIGURE 2
SITE DIAGRAM AND
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
D — LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM SIMP
*»• — FACILITY MONITORING WELL
~ STATION SAMPLED AS PMT Of INVESTIGATION
LINE
B LCACHATE COLLECTION SUMP
RQABSUnproved
-------
CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE
FIBER MANUFACTURE
AREA
AREA
HYFLO
TRASH
FIBER
SOUDS
WASTE
FILTER
MEDIA
TRASH
BURNABLE
WASTE
PIT
(1958-1971)
s
*
S
UPPER DISPOSAL LANDFILL
(1969 - PRESENT)
*
LOWER
DISPOSAL
AREA
(1958-1969)
LEACHATE
LIFT
STATION
NEW
POND N&3
OLD
POND
*
TO WEAK
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
SYSTEM
LEGEND
B - BURNABLE WASTE
NB - NONBURNABLE WASTE
FIGURE 3
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SCHEME
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
rCMMWOft IMVVJ.
CtMT.Cl
T:
American Cyanamid
FIGURE 4
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
ESCAMBIA AND SANTA ROSA COUNTIES
NEAR MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
DEPTH
IN FEET
UTHOLOGY
REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGIC UNIT
200 —
SAND AND
GRAVEL WITH
STREAKS OF
CLAY
400 —
600 —
CLAY WITH
STREAKS OF
SAND AND
SANDSTONE
800 —
1000 —
LIMESTONE
AND
DOLOMITE
1200 —
CLAY
1400 —
LIMESTONE
r~i
SAND AND GRAVEL
AQUIFER
PENSACOLA CLAY
AQUITARD
FLORIDAN AQUIFER
(UPPER PORTION)
BUCCATUNA CLAY
AQUITARD
FLORIDAN AQUIFER
(LOWER PORTION)
1600—'
(From Black, Crow and Eidsnesa, Inc., October 1971)
FIGURE 5
REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGIC UNITS
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
50'
APPROX.
50'
1
N
£
1
! i
. : !
N
•CAP
-4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CASING(GLUED)
¦ 1" PVC SAMPLE DELIVERY PIPE(CLUED)
N.
CEMENT GROUT
NATURAL SAND PACK
SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
5' NO. 10 SCREEN
"(WELL N0.22 HAS 10' SCREEN)
FIGURE 6
TYPICAL RCRA MONITORING WELL
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
125,
r
100 —
UPGRADIENT WELL
#19
5'
WATER LEVELS
3/3-5/86
•SCREENED INTERVALS-
DOWNGRADIENT WELLS
#20
#22
m
5'
SL _
10*
5'
FIGURE 7
WATER LEVEL/SCREENED INTERVAL RELATIONSHIPS
RCRA MONITORING WELLS
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
-------
TABLES
-------
TABLE 1
SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
GROUND WATER TASK FORCE INSPECTION
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
tTVv crcKnr't/v.
STATION
NUMBER
Well No. 5
Well No. 13
Well No. 18
Well No. 19
Well No. 20
Well No. 21
Well No. 22
Well No. 24
Well SI No. 1
No. A
Process Well
Leak Detection
Leachate
Collection
System Sump
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Southwest corner of closed Lower Dump;
shallow downgradlent monitoring well
Southwest corner of New Pond/Upper Landfill;
shallow downgradlent monitoring well
South side of Impoundments at Weak Waste-
water Treatment Plant; downgradlent moni-
toring well
1500 feet north-northeast of Deep Well
Equalization Basin; RCRA upgradlent moni-
toring well*
East of and adjacent to Deep Well Equali-
zation Basin; RCRA downgradlent monitoring
well
200 feet south of west end of Deep Well
Equalization Basin; RCRA downgradient moni-
toring well
West of and adjacent to Deep Well Equaliza-
tion Basin; RCRA downgradient monitoring
well
700 feet south of industrial waste area;
FL-DER Zone of discharge well
1000 feet northeast of spray irrigation
field; upgradlent monitoring well
At north side of Deep Well Equalization
Basin; one of the facility process water
supply wells
East end of Deep Well Equalization Basin;
sump collects liquids which accumulate In
the Leak Detection System
Near southeast corner of New Pond/Upper
Landfill; collection point for leachate
generated by Upper Landfill
~Gradient relationships for RCRA wells are as originally designated by American
Cyanamid and do not necessarily agree with current facility interpretations
of ground water flow directions in the vicinity of the Basin.
-------
TABLE 2
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
INFLUENT WASTEWATER ANALYSES® 1
(FEBRUARY - MAY 1985)
Concentration (mg/I)k
Parameter Minimum Maximum
pH (standard units) 2.1 11.4
turbidity (NTU) 72 293
CN- 1.5 7.5
NH3/N 23 42
Organic N 126 316
TKN 158 344
N03/N 87 155
Total N 279 447
TSS 31 1,014
BOD5 713 2,424
COD 1,364 5,683
NaSCN 165 1,440
Acrylonitrile 27 1,261
Oil and Grease 1.2 4.5
aAnalyses performed on 24-hour composite samples.
bUnits are mg/1 unless otherwise noted.
1 From American Cyanamid RCR> Part B Permit Application, July 1985
-------
TABLE 3
SAMPLE CONTAINERS
RCRA GROUND WATER MONITORING RESEARCH
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
MILTON, FLORIDA
Parameter(s)
Iron, Manganese, Sodium
Phenols
TOX
TOC, pH, specific conductance
Chloride, Sulfate
Container
1 liter plastic
1 liter amber w/phenolic cap
1 gallon glass
1 gallon wide mouth Nalgene
------- |