United States Office of Pollution Prevention September 1990 Environmental Protection Washington, DC 20460 Agency &EPA Pollution Prevention News Inside: Environmental Education page 2 Special Section on Transportation ...page 3-6 Calendar ..page 8 To be added to our mailing list, please write: Pollution Prevention News U.S. EPA 401 M Street SW (PM-219) Washington; DC 20460 Editorial Staff; PriscilU Flattery, Editor Sandy Sieg-Ross Gilah Langner Suzanne Hams A New Research Center Comes on Board Lawrence L. Ross Staff Director, Center for Waste Reduction Technologies, AIChE Chemical engineering principles and ex- pertise are at the heart of the new interest in waste reduction and are pivotal in addressing the challenge of preventing pollution. In ad- dition to the redesign of existing processes and the introduction of new processes, the basic concepts underlying waste reduction must be firmly integrated into corporate cul- tures and the educational process. The American Institute of Chemical Engi- neers (AIChE), with a mission of promoting excellence in the development and practice of the discipline, decided late last year to establish the Center for Waste Reduction Technologies. The new center will be a focal point for research, education, and information dis- semination on innovative waste reduction technologies. The aim is to build a strong foundation for a wide range of industries as they develop the next generation of clean, economically competitive processing and manufacturing facilities. The Center's key features reflect our understanding of the type of approach needed: • Active industrial involvement and support; • Targeted waste reduction research for competitiveness and technological ad- vancement; • A "systems" view to integrating chemi- cal engineering disciplines with those from other engineering and scientific fields; • Education programs to better prepare continued on page 7 Blackstone's Multi-Media Inspections Prove Cost-Effective Manik Roy, Ph.D. and Lee Dillard Massachusetts DEP In a report released in July, the Massachu- setts Blackstone Project Team found that in- spections of industrial facilities that took a multi-media approach (examining air, water, hazardous waste, and "right-to-know" to- gether) were generally more efficient than single-media inspections and werebetterable to identify source reduction opportunities as well as violations of environmental protection regulations. A joint project of the Massachusetts De- partment of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Department of Environmental Man- agement (DEM), the Blackstone Project was designed to examine alternative approaches to inspections, enforcement, and technical assistance programs as a means of promoting source reduction. The project is being used to implement provisions of the Massachusetts' 1989ToxicsUse Reduction Actwhich mandate the development of a "whole facility" ap- proach to environmental protection (see PPN, Feb. 1990). The project targeted 26 metal-intensive manufacturing facilities located in the service area of the "Upper Blackstone," the sewage treatment plant of greater Worcester. Blackstone Project field staff inspected each continued on page 7 Printed on Recycled Paper ------- 'Renew America' Gives Credit to Effective School Programs If you want to run a program in envi- ronmental education, do you have to de- velop itfrom scratch? Not anymore, thanks to a non-profit educational organization called Renew America. The group launched a contest last year to find and honor environmental programs that work—and that communities every- where can replicate. The competition was called "Searching for Success," and the 24 award-winning programs selected from nearly 1,000 entries were honored on Earth Day in Washington, D.C., this past April. From the entries, Renew America also created the "Environmental Success In- dex," a listing of all the programs that were achieving some measure of success. Renew America plans to update this list- ing each year to serve as a clearinghouse for information. In the area of environmental education, EPA has embarked on a project to produce pollution prevention education materials for students and teachers. The materials will concentrate on kindergar- ten through grade 12 and will emphasize the need for preventing pollution at the source. Ultimately, the project aims to instill in the country's youth an ethic for more integrated environmental decision- making, pollution prevention, and pro- tection of human health and theenviron- ment. The project will also encourage the private production of complementary educational materials, including videos, films, computer software, teaching aids, textbooks, etc. Special consideration will be given to the environmental education needs of urban versus rural youths. Directed by an Agency-wide group, the National Pollution Prevention Envi- ronmental Education Task Force, the Students studying stream ecology at Prince George's County's Schmidt Outdoor Education Center. Renew America's judges gave one award and singled out five other programs for special merit. The award went to the Training Student Organizers Program (TSO) of the Council on the Environment of New York City. The program teaches New York City high school students about environmental issues and helps them de- project will proceed in partnership with state and local governments, industry, educational institutions, textbook pub- lishers, and others. As a first step, a compendium of available curricula re- lating to pollution prevention is being compiled and reviewed. For more in- formation, contact Priscilla Flattery at 202-245-4164. EPA recently drafted a strategic plan on establishing an Environmental Edu- cation Program which includes pro- grams for educating youth, training fu- ture environmental management pro- fessionals, and building public aware- ness of environmental problems. The program coincides with proposed leg- islation (such as S. 1076, the National Environmental Education Act) that would create an Environmental Educa- tion Office at EPA. September 1990 velop organizing skills to involve their peers and neighbors in such projects as beach clean-ups, noise abatement cam- paigns, graffiti elimination, open space preservation and paper collection for re- cycling. Student organizers have worked with more than 275 community groups and schools in the development of 251 projects serving 61 neighborhoods in New York City. The TSO curriculum can be adapted to students of different ages, experience and ability. "The program helps the partici- pants to develop a service ethic and to feel more skilled, confident and able to relate to the world around them," say program organizers. The staff of the Council on the Environment works with classroom teachers each week, and students are trained for a full school term, for which they receive academic credit. The TSO program is funded by foundations, corpo- rations and government. One project the judges singled out for special merit is called The Farm, run by the Convent of the Sacred Heart in Green- wich, Conn. Children from the New York metropolitan area spend from one day to one week at The Farm, receiving "seem- ingly casual instruction in environmental values," according to Sister Suzanne Rogers, project director. "Shall we use continued on page 7 Pollution Prevention News - 2 Environmental Education EPA Environmental Education Initiatives ------- September 1990 3 - Pollution Prevention News Transportation In Search of Cleaner Machines he link between transportation and air pollution hasbeen well established for a long time. Most of our common forms of transportation — cars, trucks, buses — release air pollutants that cause significant health effects, including respi- ratory disease, circulatory problems, neu- rological damage, and cancer. Recent studies show that transportation is re- sponsible for approximately 66% of carbon monoxide, 43% of nitrogen oxides, 37% of lead, 31% of ozone-producing hydrocar- bons, and 20% of suspended particulates released into the air in the United States. Motor vehicle exhaust also contains carbon dioxide (C02), a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. In the U.S., cars and light trucks are the largest source of C02, contributing 33% of all emissions. Each of the 135 million cars and trucks in the U.S. emits an average of five tons of CO2int0 the atmosphere every year, for a total of about 600 million tons. Automobile air conditioners represent the largest single source (about 20%) of America's release of ozone-depleting chemicals, in this case, chlorofluorocar- bons (CFCs). Government and industry achieved dramatic success reducing motor vehicle emissions in the late 1970sand early 1980s. Yet vehicle miles travelled are expected to increase about 2% per year into the next century — a compound growth rate of 22 percent by the year 2000. To offset this growth, cars, trucks, and buses will need to be far cleaner than they are now. Can we do it? If not, urban living could become hell on wheels. Currently, there are 96 metro- politan areas that ex- ceed EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) forozone—i.e.,smog — and 41 metropolitan areas that exceed the NAAQS for carbon monoxide. This special section surveys various aspects of the transportation pollution problem. As this issue of Pollution Pre- vention Nem goes to press, the long term effects of recent events in the Persian Gulf are still highly uncertain. What is clear, however, is that American concerns for both energy security and environmental quality point in the same direction — to a need for new solutions in transportation. IF V01 ^'n'° i LXWE.THE. WVIRONMU Clean Fuels: All Run, But Which Will Fly? The President's proposed revisions to the Clean Air Act contain a significant number of provisions that would result in cleaner running vehicles, including tighter automobile tailpipe standards, a restric- tion on release of carbon monoxide at low temperatures, requirements for oxygen- ated fuels; and requirements for either a modified gasoline pump nozzle or an on- board device to contain fuel vapors. Among the most prominent and con- troversial provisions is the Clean Fuels Program, which would replace a portion of the motor, vehicle fleet in certain cities with new vehicles operating on clean- burning fuels. (Many of the provisions of the Clean Air Act were being debated when PPN went to press, including how many vehicles and cities should be in- cluded in the Clean Fuels Program.) EPA predicts that vehicle emissions will continue to decline for about a decade in any case, because modern cars will keep on replacing clunkers. But, according to Don Zinger, Assistant Director of the Office of Mobile Sources, "The Clean Air Act is vital to keeping emis- sion levels down after the turn of the century." Following are summaries of the major clean fuels that are being evaluated: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) — More than 30,000 vehicles have been con- verted torunonCNG,and theyemitmuch lower levels of smog-causing hydrocar- bons than gasoline-fueled vehicles. Gen- eral Motors is planning to manufacture over 1000 CNG pick-up trucks in early 1991 — the first marketed commercially in the U.S. Even mass-produced, CNG vehicles cost more than gasoline-fueled vehicles and service station retrofit can cost be- tween $225,000 and $400,000. CNG costs depend upon the price of competing en- ergy sources, the existence of alternative PvilUC (KftVtU MHWM*, *WlOM*V *'.10 Of &J04QAM tAiCJO* 1 Tom Tales in the Buffalo News markets for gas, and the cost of collecting and transporting the gas. Ethanol — Ethanol is the most com- mercialized alternative fuel, with 840 mil- lion gallons produced in the U.S. in 1988. It is blended into gasoline to form a 10% ethanol mixture known as gasohol, which currently has about a 7.5% share of the automotive fuels market. The price of ethanol hasbeen dropping with improved efficiency in the production process and it may soon be competitive with gasoline. Pureethanol, although not currently used, has the potential for 30% greater fuel effi- ciency than gasoline. Opinions vary on the impactofethanol-fueled vehicleson urban ozone, and overall environmental effects of ethanol are complicated to assess. continued on page 6 ------- Pollution Prevention News - 4 September 1990 Solar/Electric Cars Pick Up Speed In Race To Market Univ. of Michigan student drivers Paula Finnegan and Dave Notes with their winning Sunrunner I3SC it The solar-powered cars entered in General Motor's 1,650-mile Sunrayce USA held in July will never be seen in auto- mobile showrooms, but some of the tech- nology used to create these efficient, pol- lution-free vehicles maybe found in electric cars destined for the US automobile mar- ket within three years. Sunrayce USA, sponsored by GM, the Society of Automotive Engineers, and the Department of Energy (DOE), was de- signed to stimulate university research and interest in solar and electric vehicles. The 11-day race drew exotic-looking ve- hicles from 32 university teams. The winning vehicle, the Sunrunner, designed and built through the efforts of more than 100 University of Michigan en- gineering students, completed the race from Lake Buena Vista, Florida to Detroit, Michigan race in 72 hours, 50 minutes and 47 seconds, with an average speed of about 30 miles per hour. Second and third place winners, Western Washington University and the University of Maryland, finished within a few hours of Michigan's team. While all the students who participated in the race received an educational benefit, one of the Michigan students pointed out that the race had wider implications. "We believe that we are part of the prototype testing of this technology," Neil Chintamaneni said. "Yes, the car is ex- pensive, but we are in the process of learning and helping the world to learn that solar energy is a practical form of energy." Designing from the Ground Up American and Japanese automobile manufacturers have been researching bat- tery-powered cars since the oil crisisof the 1970s. Ford Motor Company, General Electric, and DOE have invested $20 mil- lion in developing an electric car, the EXT- II Aerostar. The eight-year joint project has succeed in producing a vehicle capable of sustained speeds of 65 mph. While Ford's EXT-II remains an experimental vehicle, GM says it plans to market a bat- tery-powered automobile by 1994. GM's Impact was designed as an elec- tric vehicle from the ground up to meet the safety and performance standards of gasoline-powered cars. The vehicle can accelerate from 0 to 60 in eight seconds, and has a top speed of 75 mph. Its battery pack is designed to last 120 miles between 2-hour recharges. Despite the significant technological strides represented by the Impact, however, cost and practicality problems have not been solved. GMnoted when it formally unveiled the Impact in January that the car's operating costs in GM's electric car, Impact the Los Angeles market would be twice that of conventional gasoline-powered cars. Yet public concern for the environ- ment may create a demand for these alter- natives to piston engine cars. Sunlight and Electricity While electric vehicles are pollution- free during operation, the electricity used to charge the car's batteries is produced by utility plants. Even this pollution may be eliminated by using principles tested in solar races such as Sunrayce USA. DOE and NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab are currently investigating ways to in- crease the range and reduce the operating costs of electric vehicles by using photo- voltaic (PV) cells to supplement power during operation. PV solar cells are mounted on the exterior surfaces of these solar vehiclesand convert sunlightdirectly into electricity. Cars which exclusively use solar power are not practical since current PV solar cells cannot produce enough electricity to power a commercial ve- hicle. However, some assistance from PV cells can cut operation and mainte- nance costs and improve electric ve- hicles' market potential. According to Richard King of DOE's Conservation and Renewable Energy Di- vision, if a solar-assisted battery vehicle were driven less than 10 miles and then parked outside, recharging the batteries could be accomplished by the PV cells during a normal 8-hour work day. Under this scenario, King said, a consumer might recoup an investment for the PV cells in a battery-powered car in nine months. While government and industry pro- grams continue research into solar and battery powered vehicles, the top three finishing teams of Sunrayce USA are pre- paring to compete in Australia's 1,950- mile World Solar Challenge scheduled to begin November 11. In the last world race in 1987, GM's Sunraycer won first place with an average speed of 41.6 mph. ------- September 1990 5 - Pollution Prevention News DOT: States, Cities Must Find Their Own Solutions For an official view of transportation- related pollution and possible cures, PPN interviewed Joseph Canny, Deputy Assis- tant Secretary of Transportation for Policy and International Affairs. His responsibili- ties at the Department of Transportation (DOT) include environmental programs and general oversight of surface transpor- tation policy. PPN: Many people feel that even ivith alternative fuels and improved car engines, we face more serious pollution in the future. What is DOT's view — and role? JC: As I understand the EPA projections, there should continue to be improvement over at least the next several years as the older, dirtier vehicles are pulled out of the fleet and replaced with contemporary de- signs. Beyond that, the new standards in the Clean Air Act amendments should resultin substantial continuingreductions in pollution levels, both in tailpipe emis- sions and evaporative losses. How that will balance against the continuing growth in traffic and increased congestion in ur- ban areas is a matter of conjecture. We can only hope that continued progress on ve- hicles and in alternative fuels will help achieve the standards. .. The nature of transportation programs has historically been one of local and state decision-making with the federal govern- ment providing funding. With a few ex- ceptions, like the interstate highway sys- tem, the decisions about when and where to build the highway and how many lanes, and what kinds of public transportation systems, have been local decisions. In the past, we have not provided as much flexibility in our programs as might have been helpful to permit more creative packaging locally of transportation pro- grams. But there is a fair amount of money that's available in the current highway and transit programs that can be used for either. Highway funding can be used for high occupancy vehicle lanes and con- struction of busways, for example. While there is flexibility under the current programs, there isn't enough, and we hope to deal with that in reauthorization of the sur- face transportation programs next year. PPN:The National Transportation Policy issued by DOT in February does not con- tain plans to restrict the use of cars by private individuals as an environmental measure. Why not? JC: We see that as something that ought to be developed at the state and local level... We have a longstanding difference of opinion with some people within EPA. We tend to view transportation as a ser- vice function or a following function. Transportation serves other societal ac- tivities and needs, and most often tends to follow land use and development deci- sions. Consequently, to try to restrict transportation after those decisions have If we as a nation were to conclude that our reliance on the automobile has become excessive, we could change that. been made is likely to be counterproduc- tive from an environmental perspective. If you don't provide adequate capacity, you have higher levels of congestion on the roads and that generates more pollu- tion. Another concern is that by restrict- ing transportation, you restrict economic vitality in a metropolitan area. PPN: What is DOT's attitude towards Intelligent Vehicles andHighway Systems (IVHS)? JC: We think there's a lot of promise in IVHS. It's not a panacea — there are no silver bullets. We search for incremental progress in various areas, and IVHS is one of them. Congested traffic generates more emissions than free-flowing traffic, so to the extent that we can facilitate traffic flow, we can solve some of these problems and reduce emissions in the process. PPN: The Netherlands Environmental Plan sets specific goals for transporta- tion, such as 75% reduced emissions of NOxand hydrocarbons from private cars by the year 2000. Do you see the U.S. ever setting such specific goals? JC: I don't. The U.S. and the Netherlands are really very different. I expect that the popula- tion density of the Netherlands is equivalent only to our most densely popula ted areas, say New Jersey or New York. To try to take poli- cies that are progressive and effective under those circumstances and apply them to the U.S., where there are more dispersed land use patterns and long distances to be traveled, is not a sound approach. PPN: Higher gasoline taxes have also been proposed as a way of making the individual driver bear more of the actual costs of trans- portation, including environmental costs. What is DOT's position? JC: As a pollution control device, we are very skeptical. In the short term, gasoline consumption and travel may be reduced. We certainly did find that driver behavior changed somewhat during the energy price shocks during the 1970s but what principally happened was that people bought smaller, more fuel-efficient cars and kept driving. Gasoline tax increases that are large enough to substantially dampen consumer demand could have serious macroeconomic effects. PPN: Is there any chance the baby boom generation will cut back on their driving out of environmental concern? JC: We haven't seen any evidence of a major shift away from automobiles.. . If you look at any recent period, the total number of vehicles on the road continues to grow, and my sense is that it's growing faster on a percentage basis than thedriver- age population is growing. Ifweasanation—from thegrassroots— were to conclude that our reliance on the automobile has become excessive, we could change that. It would take a long time to reduce the patterns of suburban spread development that occurred since 1946, yet we could begin to build at densities that would be more amenable to transit, and to locate business and residential services in ways that would support the operating re- quirements of transit services. But in gen- eral, the current population patterns don't provide for this, especially with the growth in two-earner families. ------- Pollution Prevention News - 6 September 1990 Transportation Fuel Efficiency: Silver Lining Behind Current Clouds In the years following the first oil crisis of 1973, average new car fuel economy doubled from 14 miles per gallon to 28 mpg. But when oil prices collapsed in 1986, so did concern over oil con- sumption; between 1985 and 1989, oil use in the U.S. increased about 10 percent, and improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency leveled off. Meanwhile, prototypes for high-efficiency automobiles have been available for several years. Volvo, Renault, Volkswagen, General Motors, Ford, Peugeot, and Toyota have working proto- types that get about 60 or more miles to the gallon in city driving and 70 plus on the highway. Renault's VESTA2, which uses new lightweight construction materials, boasts 78 mpg city and 107 mpg highway mileage. Volvo says its LCP 2000 can deliver 62 mpg city and 81 mpg highway; it seats 4 people, accelerates to 60 miles per hour in 11 seconds, and more than meets U.S. safety standards. Engineers estimate the LCP 2000, completed in 1985, could be manufactered at a cost comparable to today's sub- compact. But Volvo still has no plans to market the car in the U.S. Whether any of these cars will ultimately reach the market will depend on a host of factors — oil prices and availability, fuel economy standards, and environmental concerns. "Car manufacturers are probably going to give much more 80 -i Drive alone Share Drive Mass Transit Walk Work at Home Taxi, other We Want to be Alone More American commuters drive to work alone in their own cars than use any other form of transportation. The proportion of workers using public transportation declined by over one-half from 1960 to 1980, and the decline continued to 1985. There was also a significant shift between 1980 and 1985 from ride sharing to driving alone. It has been estimated that 33 million gallons of gasoline could be saved each day — and car air pollution signifi- cantly reduced — if the average commuter passenger load were increased by one person. Source: U.S. DOT Cutting Aerodynamic Drag Pollution prevention opportunities abound, even in invis- ible places. Consider aerodynamic drag; Every automobile pushes an average of 4.5 tons of air out of i ts way each mi te that it travels. Likewise, every large tractor-trailer truck pushes about 20 tonsof air travelling each mile. The collective national energy penalty for pushingallofthisainsenormous, amounting to an estimated 8 billion gallons of diesel fuel per year for heavy trucks alone. At typical highway speeds nearly half of the power developed by an engine is used to overcome the resistance of the atmosphere. The drag coef- ficient of American cars has improved since the late 1970s, from an average of 0.44 down to 0.3 for the Ford Sable; European car manufacturers have undertaken innovative improvements in this area as well. credence to introducing fuel efficient technologies now than three years ago when we were not worried about oil security and global warming," says Deborah Bleviss, executive director of the International Institute for Energy Conservation in Washington. Fuel economy improvements could mean environmental benefits in addition to keeping down fuel costs and lines at the gas station. One estimate is that each increase in average fuel efficiency of 1 mile per gallon reduces C02 emissions by about 40 billion pounds per year, roughly the equivalent of closing 6 coal- fired power plants. Clean Fuels from page 3 Hydrogen—Although hydrogen is being tested as a motor vehicle fuel in other countries, ithas not yetattracted much attention in theU.S. because of its currently very high costs. Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) — A number of fleets in California are testing LPG, which is cleaner burning than gasoline. Methanol — Substituting methanol for gasoline could reduce ozone as well as visible smoke, oxides of nitrogen, and particulates; however, the full environmental verdict on methanol is not yet in. The California Energy Commission has sponsored extensive tests of methanol-fueled vehicles in cooperation with automobile manufacturers and oil companies. "Fuel-flexible vehicles" (FFVs) have been developed that can run on any mix of methanol, ethanol, and gasoline. The first methanol heavy-duty truck engine demon- stration project in the U.S. began in Los Angeles this year. Although produced only in small quantities to date, methanol is believed to be potentially competitive with gasoline. EPA's analyses suggest that both dedicated methanol vehicles and vehicles optimized for ethanol could compete in cost with future gasoline vehicles. Reformulated gasoline — Reformulated gasoline is gasoline whose physical or chemical properties have been changed in some way to achieve a particular objective. Oil companies and automobile manufacturers are engaged in a joint research project to test the use of 25 different gasolines in various vehicles to determine their potential for meeting stricter emissions standards with minimal impact on engine performance. Several major oil companies are now marketing newly reformu- lated gasolines or intend to market them soon. ------- September 1990 7 - Pollution Prevention News Blackstone from page 1 facility in teams of one to three inspectors (depending on the complexity of the fa- cility), with each team inspecting the facility's compliance with air, water, haz- ardous waste, and SARA 313 requirements, and identifying source reduction oppor- tunities. The facilities were also provided technical assistance, when requested, as part of DEM's "Central Massachusetts Pollution Prevention Project." According to the project report, single- inspector and two-inspector teams are the best candidates for future DEP use. Single Blackstone inspectors completed multi- media inspections of facilities that were regulated by two DEP programs in less time than two single-media inspectors; similarly, paired inspection teams were more cost effective than the status quo for inspecting facilities regulated by three DEP programs. Among other things, the Blackstone inspectors found 16 violations and five other problems that probably would not have been found during standard inspec- tions, including unpermitted waste streams and an unintended loophole be- tween the air and pretreatment programs. The project also provided valuable in- formation for pretreatmentand identified specific source reduction opportunities at 16 of the 26 facilities. According to the report, the coordination of DEP's regula- tory and DEM's technical assistance ac- tivities enhanced DEP's regulatory ac- tivities, and encouraged industry utiliza- tion of DEM's expertise, without com- promising the mission or reputation of either agency. Also,21 of the facilities said they would support DEP changing all in- spections to multi-media inspections. Because of the success of the project, DEP will be testing the approach in other settings in FY91: using different subject industry groups and more DEP inspectors in all four DEP regional offices. The ef- fectiveness of source reduction-biased enforcement will also be evaluated in FY91. For a copy of the executive summary of "The FY90 Report on the Blackstone Project," write to Walter Hope, Mass DEP, One Winter St., 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02108. For the complete 140-page report, send a check for $8.60 written to "Commonwealth of Massachusetts" to State Bookstore, Room 116, State House, Boston, MA 02133. Renew America from page 2 chemicals to control the beetle or shall we use slower, organic methods of control and risk losing the crop? Such a decision would be made with thestudents....Every event is an opportunity to foster the de- velopment of healthy attitudes about the plant, animal and human community. "The Farm program has had a positive impact on the lives of many children and those whose lives they touch," Sister Rogers added. "Some students have re- turned to their schools and initiated pro- grams to conserveenergy, or recycle waste, or ban styrofoam products. We hope and expect that the 'ripple effect' will occur, and that those who are influenced by these children will make a noticeable impact on the health of our planet." As thi s school year begins, every school district in Wisconsin has incorporated en- vironmental education into every subject area at every grade level, as part of "Wisconsin Environmental Education Initiatives," another program mentioned for special merit. The Wisconsin program involves extensive teacher training and certification's well as special educational materials and public television program- ming. The Prince George's County Pub- lic Schools system in Maryland was also recognized for its success in integrating environmental education into its social studies, science, history, math, and other curricula. Other special merit designations went to: Center from page 1 students for engineering practice in waste reduction; • Commitment to technology transfer and industry/university collaboration; and • Leadership and outreach beyond the Center itself. The Center's research efforts will be carried out by university-based consortia and single investigators. Companies may fund research targeted to their specific needs or the needsof their industry sector. We will encourage companies to volunteer to "test prove" new and emerging waste reduction technologies. Beach Channel High School students campaign for protection of wetlands around Jamaica Bay. • the Textbook Review Program, a Texas program in which representatives of the Sierra Club and Audubon Society evaluated textbooks for environmental content and made recommendations to the state board of education that led to changes in the board's requirements, and • the Small Farm Educational Program of the Heifer Project International Learn- ing and Livestock Center in Perryville, Ariz., a 2-acre farm run by students using only renewable energy and biological controls. To enter next year's Searching for Suc- cess competition or to learn more about the Environmental Success Index, write to Cathy Nemsick, Renew America, 140016th St.,NW, Suite 710, Washington, DC 20036, or call (202) 232-2252. The Center is also committed to bring- ing advances into the education process to ensure that environmentally compatible design becomes a permanent feature of industrial practice. Vehicles to achieve this goal include new course materials for undergraduate and graduate curricula, continuing education courses for practic- ing engineers, and stud ent internship pro- grams. For further information, please contact me at the Center, 345 E. 47th St., New York, NY 10017 (Tel: 212-705-7407; Fax: 212-752-3294). We look forward to a new and productive era in waste reduction technology research. ------- Pollution Prevention News - 8 September 1990 Calendar of Events Title Sponsor Date/Location Contact WPCF Annual Conference - •. *, ' f . Water Pollution Control Federation Oct. 7-11 Washington, DC Conf. Dept. 703-684-2400 Annual Meeting National Association of Solvent Recyclers Oct. 8-10 Corpus Christi, TX Kimberly Levy 202-463-6956 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (course) Florida Chamber of Commerce Oct. 17-19 St. Petersburg, FL Carol McRae 904-385-1790 Solid Waste Recycling Conference & Exhibition RSWT90 Oct. 30-31 Detroit, MI Ben Deutsch 800-999-3123 Hazardous and Solid Waste Minimization (Course) Government Institutes, Inc. Nov. 1-2/Las Vegas, NV Nov. 8-9/Parsippany, NJ Terri Green 301-251-9250 5th National Household Hazardous Waste Management Conference U.S. EPA, CA Dept. of Health Services, CA Integrated Waste Management Board Nov. 5-7 San Francisco, CA Michele Sevigny 508-470-3044 Haz. Waste Management & Pollution Prevention Course Applied Environmental Technologies Corp. Nov. 7-8/Boxborough, MA Nov. 28-29/Pittsburgh, PA Dec. 12-13/Meriden, CT Kimberly Moore 800-926-1AET 11th Annual Meeting Society of Environmental Toxi- cology and Chemistry (SETAC) Nov. 11-15 Arlington, VA Randall S. Wentsel 301-671-2063 Crossroads: Architects & The Environment American Institute of Architects Nov. 13 Washington, DC Doug Greenwood 202-626-7463 Used Oil Management And Compliance Conference National Oil Recyclers Assn., Gov't. Institutes, Inc. Nov. 27-28 Washington, DC Terri Green 301-251-9250 Pollution Prevention Strategies American Ecology Services Inc./Geraghty & Miller Nov. 29-30 Arlington, VA Richard Miller 212-371-1620 FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE & FEES PAID EPA PERMIT NO. G-35 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 United States Environmental Protection Agency (PM-219) Washington, DC 20460 REMINDER! Send in your 1990 pollution prevention success stories by Oct. 15 for inclusion in the November/ December Pollution Prevention News ------- |