-------
may or may not be correct and would need additional data for
verification.
Heat loss in a biological system is an important consideration
because it decreases the overall efficiency of the system by
reducing the BOD removal rate and the endogenous rate of solids
reduction. For example, if the temperature of the aerated lagoon
were the same as the influent sewage, 12 degrees C, the overall
BOD removal efficiency would be approximately 82 percent rather
than 76.5 percent.
The BOD^ and SS reductions through the aerated lagoon were
measured at 76.5 percent and 62 percent, respectively, with a
total effluent BOD^ of 45 mg/l and SS of 52 mg/1. During this
study, the lagoon was operating at a detention time of 5.25
days, temperature of 7.2 degrees C and an organic loading of
0.7 lb BOD^/lb MLSS/day. The BOD5 removal compares quite favor-
ably with a calculated value of 77.5 percent assuming complete-
mix kinetics with a BOD5 removal rate of 0.034/day(5) and a
temperature coefficient of 1.035^. (See Appendix C for cal-
culations.) For comparison, if this system were operated as a
complete-mix system with a higher horsepower-to-volume ratio,
the overall efficiency of the lagoon would be reduced to a
BODj removal of 70 percent and SS would be Increased from 52
mg/1 to 150-160 mg/1.
Total phosphates were reduced 29 percent in the lagoon from
-------
28
new cells which settle out and to the sedimentation of insoluble
phosphates. The high concentration of TPO^ in the lagoon bottom
sludge supports this conclusion.
While data on the influent and effluent of the aerated
lagoon indicate no reduction of TKN, the percent of TKN in the
bottom sludge solids does indicate a reduction of over 8 mg/1.
This also indicates that the TKN value reported for the raw
sewage may be inaccurate. A limited amount of data (not re-
ported) together with the TKN data indicated that the lagoon is
not achieving nitrification. Since the Chemawa lagoon is loaded
at a rate of 0.7 lb BOD^/lb MLSS/day, this is in accordance
with work by Eckenfelder^ who states that little or no nitrifica-
tion occurs at loadings above 0.4 lb B0D5/day/lb MLSS.
Table 3 summarizes the efficiency of the aerated lagoon over
the period of this survey.
TABLE 3
Aerated Lagoon Efficiency
Parameter
Raw Waste
Aerated Lagoon
Effluent
Percent Reduction
Temp, degrees C 12.1
7.2
40.5
BOD 5 mg/1
SS mg/1
190
138
45
52
62
76.5
TPO4 mg/1 as P 10.7
TKN mg/1 as N 27.9
29.8
7.6
29
Total Coliform
org/100 ml 6.6 x 106 1.4 x 106
-------
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
T
T
OXYGEN DEMAND
0
OXYGEN AVAILABLE
FROM AERATOR
200
LB. OXYGEN PER DAY
300
-------
31
Sludge Accumulation
Since May 1965, when the aerated lagoon was placed in
service* approximately 6*600 cubic feet of sludge has accumulated
on the bottom of the lagoon to a depth of approximately 4.5
inches. This represents a rate of 79 pounds of solids accumulation
per day in the lagoon. The sludge accumulation rate has been
calculated to be 0.45 lb dry solids/lb BOD^ removed on the baBis
of the sludge analyses data in Appendix B and the computed
volume. (See Appendix C for the calculation.) This value is
similar to that reported for aerobic lagoons by Eckenfelder^
of 0.5 lb dry solids/lb BOD5 removed.
Aerator Evaluation
As indicated by data in Table B-8, Appendix B, the 5 Hp
aerator, which provides a horsepower-to-volume ratio of 6.67/mg,
was found to be sufficient to maintain a uniform DO and suspended
solids. Little difference in either DO or SS with depth or
distance from the aerators was noted. It is also pertinent to
note that, with the 6.67 Hp/mg ratio, a mixed liquor suspended
solids concentration of 52 mg/1 was maintained in the lagoon.
This value has been reported at a similar power-to-volume ratio.
Regarding oxygen transfer capability, the aerator was
calculated to have an efficiency of 2,22 lb 0^/Hp-hour which is
inadequate to meet the oxygen requirements at all operating
conditions. This ie Illustrated by Figure 7. At a BOD5 load
-------
32
temperatures below 17 degrees C. However, if the BOD5 load is
increased by 10 percent to 253 lb/day, the aerator is inadequate
above 15 degrees C, and at a 25 percent increase to 288 lb/day,
the operating temperature is reduced to approximately 11 degrees
C and below.
Reference is made to the calculations in Appendix B for
additional details regarding this analysis.
The supplemental spray aeration system was analyzed
theoretically assuming a water droplet 1/16" diameter, 50 gpm
pumping rate, a droplet exposure time of 5 seconds and a DO
of 0 mg/1 in the lagoon. At these conditions, the supplemental
spray aeration would provide approximately 1.6 lb 02/day. While
this quantity of oxygen relative to the amount provided by the
mechanical aerator is insignificant, it should be noted that the
effective droplet size could be much smaller than the assumed
1/16" diameter which could increase the oxygen transfer
significantly.
Polishing Pond Evaluation
The polishing pond, which is actually a facultative
stabilization pond, was loaded at a value of 31 lb BODj/acre/day
and had a hydraulic detention period of approximately 16 days.
The organic loading is well within the range of 20-50 lb BOD/
acre/day generally recommended and performance of the pond is
typical of stablization ponds. BOD^ reduction through the pond
-------
33
concentration in the lagoon and lagoon effluent is responsible
for most of the solids and BOD^.
As indicated by Table 12, the effluent from the polishing
/
pond had a BOD^ of 22 mg/1, for a reduction of 51 percent.
Solids were decreased by only 13.5 percent but converted from
bacterial solids to algae solids. This is indicated by the
increased concentrations of algae in the polishing pond from
1,440/ml in the aerated lagoon to 18,400/ml in the polishing
pond.
The DO increase through the polishing pond from 3.5 to 9.2
mg/1 is due primarily to algae photosynthesis, but is also in-
creased by the lower temperature which increases the saturation
level by approximately 0.8 mg/1.
The total kjeldahl nitrogen reduction of 15.5 percent is
attributed primarily to sedimentation of the bacterial solids
but would also include bacterial conversion or organic nitrogen
to nitrites and nitrates.
Table 4 summarizes the performance of the polishing
pond.
TABLE 4
Polishing Pond Performance
Parameter
Influent
Effluent
Percent Reduction
Temp, degree C 7.2
BOD^ mg/1 45
4.5
22
38
-------
34
TABLE 4 (CONT.)
Polishing Pond Performance
Parameter
Influent
Effluent
Percent Reduction
SS, mg/1
52
45
13.5
TKN, mg/1 as N
29.8
25.2
15.5
Algae/ml
1440
18,400
Total Coliform
org/100 ml
1,400,000
713000
95
DO, mg/1
3.5
9.2
Chlorination Evaluation
The chlorine contact chamber has a capacity of 3,700 gallons,
which provides a detention time of 37 minutes. At the time of
this study, the chlorine application rate was reported at 6 lb/day,
or approximately 5 mg/1. Data obtained on-site and in the labora-
tory for residual chlorine indicated a much higher application
rate than 5 mg/1, however. The 10 mg/1 reduction in SS and BOD^
through the chlorination unit indicates a chlorine dosage at
least greater than 10 mg/1. Perhaps the scales used to determine
the amount of chlorine used daily are reading inaccurately.
The chlorination unit was effective in reducing total
coliform as indicated by an average of less than 10 org/100 ml
in the final effluent.
Cost of Treatment
-------
35
three stages as the school grew in size. The first stage con-
sisted of a septic tank and drain field. The second stage
was the construction of a two-celled lagoon and conversion
of the spetic tank to a chlorine contact chamber. This con-
struction took place in 1961 at a cost of $30,000. The third
stage included construction of the aerated lagoon and conversion
of the two-celled lagoon to a single cell polishing pond. This
stage took place in May 1965, at an estimated cost of $32,500.
Based on ten months operating records from April 1967,
through January 1968, the total annual cost of operating this
system including amortization of capital costs adjusted to
1965 price level is $115 per mg treated or $0.0765 per lb
BOD,. removed. These costs are broken down as follows:
Cost/mg Cost/lb BOD^ removed
Capital $81.60 $0.05
0 & M $32.40 $0.0265
Operation and maintenance costs include 46.5 percent for
power, 14.4 percent for chlorine, 29 percent for operating labor
-------
REFERENCES
1. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-
water, 12th Edition, APHA, AWWA, WPGF.
2. Beutra, J. K. , George, Mo G. and Sharma, M., "Contribution
of Algae to Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Water,"
Water and Sewage Works, March 1968.
3. Watson, K. S., et als "The Contribution from the Individual
Home to the Sewer System," JWPCF, Vol. 39, No. 12, December
1967.
4. Eckenfelder, W. W., Design and Performance of Aerated Lagoons
for Pulp and Paper Waste Treatment. 16th Purdue Industrial
Waste Conference.
5. Eckenfelder, W. W., Journal Sanitary Engineering Division,
ASCE, Volume 93, No. SA6, December 1967.
6. Eckenfelder, W. W., New Design Advances in Biological
Treatment of Industrial Wastes, 17th Annual Meeting,
Oklahoma Industrial Wastes and Pollution Control
Conference, November 15-16, 1966,
7. Fair, G. M„ and Geyer, J. C., 'VJater Supply and Waste-
-------
-------
-------
41
Oxygen Uptake of Bottom Sludge
The oxygen uptake of the bottom sludge was measured in
a sealed container using a DO probe with a continuous recording
chart. The sludge depth to water depth ratio was maintained
similar to actual field conditions. The unit was aerated,
completely sealed, agitated sufficiently to insure complete
liquid movement, yet not suspend the bottom solids, and the
oxygen uptake rate measured. The rate was measured at tem-
peratures from 5 to 27 degrees C.
Total Phosphate and Ortho-phosphate
Sample is digested with sulfuric acid and potassium
persulfate to convert phosphates to ortho-phosphate — modification
of Pacific Northwest Water Laboratory. References: J. Murphy,
and J. P. Riley, Analytical Chim. Acta. 27, 31 (1962); J. D. H.
Strickland and T. R. Parsons, "A Manual of Sea Water Analysis,"
p. 47, Bulletin No. 125, 2nd Edition revised, Fisheries Research
-------
-------
TABLE B-2
(a)
Climatological Data
43
Date Precipitation - Inches Ave. Air Temperature °C
January 1
5.6
January 2
2.2
January 3
2.8
January 4
0
January 5
3.3
January 6
-0.6
January 7
0.14
2.8
January 8
0.25
8.3
January 9
1.24
10.0
January 10
0.16
4.5
January 11
Trace
8.3
C d)
Data from State Climatologist, U. S. Weather Bureau, Salem
-------
TABLE B-3
Onsite Measurements on Grab Samples
Time of sample
Analysis Location
1-9-
>68
1^1(5-68
Ave
00:15
06:00
12:00
18:00
00:15
06:00
*'.12 £00
18:00
Temp.
°C Raw
9.4
10.0
8.0
15.0
12.3
17.5
916
15.0
12.1
A.L. Eff^
8.3
3.1
7.5
¦10.5-
8.5
8.2
» 7:Q
4.5
7.2
P.P. Eff^
3.1
3.1
6.5
6.5
5.0
4 .V
5:0
3.0
4.5
EJinal Eff.
3.1
2.9
5.7
5.5
4.5
3-5
s.o
3.0
4.2
pH Kaw
6.9
7.5
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.6
7:1
7.8
A.L. Eff.
7.4
7.6
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.5
7.1
8.1
P.P. Eff.
7.9
8.1
7.6
7.7
7.9
8.1
8;o
9.1
"^inal Eff.
! .1
7.9
7.6
J1,h
7.7
7.9
7 ^
8.3
D.O., mg/1 Raw
-
6.1
5.2
-
-
A.L. Eff.
4.3
5.4
3.2
3.3
3.9
P.P. Eff.
8.9
9.1
9.0
7.1
10.8
Final Eff.
10.1
9.7
8.8
7.6
10.4
-------
45
TABLE B-4
DATA ON RAW SEWAGE
Time of Composited Sample
Parameter*
1-9-68
1-
10-68
Average
0-12:00 1 12:00-24:00
0-12:00
112:00-24:00
Flow, gpd
144,000
225,000
80,000
126,000
144,000
pH
7.5
7.4
7.8
7.9
—
Alk
90
106
117
139
Ill
SS
80
210
60
126
138
vss
56
182
44
1??
118
t?04
5.4
13.6
6.8
14
10.7
TKN
15.2
34.2
18.3
36.9
27.9
COD
381
302
—
BOD,
86
280
78
218
190
-------
46
TABLE B-5
DATA ON EFFLUENT FROM AERATED LAGOON
Time of Composited Sample
Parameter* 1-9-68 1-10-68 Average
0-12:00
12:00-24:00
0-12:00
12:00-24:00
PH
7.6
7.5
7.6
7.5
Alk
189
177
165
165
176
SS
30
66
54
44
51
VSS
30
66
54
52
52
TPO as P
4
6.9
7.8
8.0
7.7
7.6
TKN
29.3
30.7
28.6
29.3
29.8
COD
154
116
—
bod5
48
43
42
47
45
-------
TABLE B-6
DATA ON POLISHING POND EFFLUENT
Time of Composited Sample
Parameter* 1-9-68 1-10-68 Average
0-12:00 12:00-24:00 0-12:00 12:00-24:00
pH 8.2 7.9 7.9 8.0
Alk 181 172 174 176 175
SS 42 46 40 48 45
VSS 41 46 40 48 45
TP0. 7.3 7.4 6.8 7.2 7.3
4
TKN 22.9 26.2 26.2 26.1 25.5
COD 68 72
BOD_ 23 21 23 23 22
-------
48
TABLE B-7
DATA ON FINAL EFFLUENT
Time of Composited Sample
Parameter* 1-9-68 1-10-68 Average
0-12:00 12:00-24:00 0-12:00 12;00-24:00
PH
8.1
8.0
7.9
8.0
Alk
166
167
167
165
166
SS
28
36
32
42
35
VSS
28
36
32
42
35
tpo4
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.2
TKN
22.9
25.0
25.0
23.2
24.1
COD
80
95
—
bod5
10
15
14
9
12
-------
TABLE B-8
DATA ON AERATED LAGOON
Parameter
Sample Depth
ft.
Distance
10
from Lagoon Center-fi
30 50 ' 70
o (a)
Temp., C
1
8.7
8.7
8.9
9.1
4
8.7
8.7
8.8
9.1
(a)
DO, mg/1
1
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.4
4
4.2
3.7
3.6
3.2
SS, mg/1^
1
30
44
40
40
3.5
44
40
44
76
^Samples taken 1-9-68
-------
50
TABLE B-9
TOTAL COLTFORM ANALYSES, org/100 ml
Station
6 6 4
Date Time 01 x 10 03 x 10 05 x 10 06
January 9 0 1.6 1.3 4.8
2 1.1 <10
4 1.6 1.0 4.3
6 7.4 <10
8 11.0 1.5 5.6
10 6.0 <10
12 3.3 1.2 6.5
14 18.0 <10
16 11.0 1.3 6.7
18 6.2 <10
20 3.3 1.3 18.0
22 4.1 100
24 2.7 1.5 6.4
January 10 2 3.1 <10
4 1.8 1.3 4.8
6 5.0
8 5.0 1.4 6.2
10 5.5 <10
12 1.3 1.4 5.3
14 4.5 <10
16 6.5 1.6 6.1
18 8.7 <10
20 6.6 1.9 5.4
-------
TABLE B- 10
Aerated Lagoon Sludge
Station
PH
TKN^b>
TPO^h)
T.S.
%
T.V.S.
%
% PO^ content
of dry solids
% TKN of
dry solids
Depth
in.
7
5.3
2110
832.
6.6
3.8
12.6
32
3
8
6.7
1085
544
8.4
2.2
6.4
12.9
3.5
9
6.1
2500
569
8.6
3.8
6.6
29.0
5
10
6.4
1810
939
9.4
4.2
10
19.3
5
Weighted
Average
1930
717
8.6
3.6
8.4
22.5
4.5
(a) Collected 1/9/68
-------
TABLE B-11
Date Time Temp. D.O. Sat. D.O. Sat. at
% Temp mg/1
1/31/68 1040 20 55 9.2
1330 20 26 9.2
1545 20 81 9.2
1815 20 52 9.2
1935 20 98 9.2
2300 20 34 9.2
2/1/68 0835 20 91 9.2
0940 20 53 9.2
1130 9 95 11.6
1210 9 90.5 11.6
1330 12 93 10.8
1400 12 89 10.8
1440 20 100 9.2
1510 20 90 9.2
Oxygen Uptake
% hr mg/l/hr
10.2
0.94
11.6
1.07
18.7
1.72
35.1
3.23
6.7
0.78
8.0
0.86
20.0
-------
Time
1555
1625
1840
2040
2240
0040
0240
0440
0640
0920
1035
1125
1225
1330
1405
TABLE B-11
(Cont.)
Temp. D.O. Sat. D.O. Sat. at Oxygen Uptake
% Temp mg/1 % hr mg/l/hr
15 74 10.1
15 70 10.1 8.0
6.5 77 12.3
6.5 73 2.0 0.25
6.5 70.5 1.3 0.16
6.5 68.5 1.0 0.12
6.5 66.0 1.2 0.15
6.5 63.0 1.5 0.18
6.5 62.0 0.5 0.06
12.5 74.0 10.7
12.5 70 3.2 0.34
19.5 77 9.25
19.5 70 7.0 0.65
27.5 77 8.0
27.5 64 13.7 1.10
VJl
-------
54
TABLE B-1,2
Operation-Maintenance Costs/Month
Date
Power
Chlorine
Operation
Maintenance
1/68
29.50
22.50
41.50
-
12/67
29.30
22.50
ii
35.00
11/67
-
II
it
-
10
-
II
II
13.30
9
60.00
II
II
15.00
8
-
15.00
II
15.00
7
-
15.00
II
10.00
6
-
15.00
II
10.00
5
105.00
22.50
II
28.00
4
104.50
22.50
II
15.00
Total
328.30
202.50
416 :oo
141.30
-------
-------
56
Aerated Lagoon Temperature
Eckenfelder^) gives the following relation for predicting
aerated lagoon operating temperatures:
Tw = QTj + 12ATa
Q + 12A
where Tw = lagoon temperature
Q = waste flow, mgd
= Waste temperature
A = lagoon surface area, million square feet
Ta = air temperature
For the survey period, it is assumed the mean effective
air temperature can be computed by taking the average air tem-
perature for the survey dates and the preceding eight days.
This value is computed as 3.8 degrees C from data in Table B-2.
Ta = 3„8 degrees C
Q = 0.144 mgd
T^ = 12.1 degrees C
A = 0.01875 million square feet
Tw = (0.144K12) + (12) (0.01875") (3.8)
0.144 + 12 x 0.01875
T = 1.74 + 0.86
w 0.144 + 0.225
X = 7o2 degrees C
w
% Heat Loss = 12.1 - 7.2
-------
57
Solids Accumulation
Total sludge accumulated = 6600 cubic feet
Total elapsed time s 23 months or 690 days
Percent moisture in sludge, P » 91.4%
Percent volatile matter in sludge = 42%
Specific gravity of sludge, Sfl is given by the relation/7^
Sg 250/(100 + 1.5 P^
where Pv = percent volatile matter in
sludge
Wt of sludge, W8 is given by the relation, ^
Ws - 62.4 (100-P) S8V - P (S8-l)
100
Ss « 250/100 + 1.5 x 42 - 1.54
W = 62.4(100-91.4)(1.54)(6600)-(91.4)(1.54-1)
100
W8 c 5.450.000 - negligible
100
W " 54,500 lb
s
Sludge accum/day = 54.500 = 79 lb/day
690
lb of BODj removed/day 13 230 x .765 = 176 lb/day
Sludge accum/lb BOD removed = 79 = 0.45 lb solids/lb BOD5 removed
-------
58
Aerated Lagoon Efficiency
BOD^ removal efficiency can be calculated from the relation:
L/Lq = 1/1 + KSat
where LQ = influent BOD5 mg/1
L = effluent soluble BOD5 mg/1
K = BOD 5 removal rate/day
t = detention time, days
Sa = aeration volatile suspended solids
For the survey period
Assuming
where
then
L0
= 190 mg/1
Sa
= 52 mg/1
t
= 5.25 days
K20
= 0.034/day^ and Rj. =
(0.034)(1.035)
T
= 7.2 degrees C
Krji
= 0.022/day
L
190
= 27 mg/1
1 + 0.022 x 5.25 x 52
The total effluent BOD5 is computed from the relation:
BOD5 = L + BOD5 of solids
Assuming mg BCH^/mg SS = 0.3^
then BOD 5 = 27 +0.3 x 52 =43 mg/1
Calculated efficiency = 190 - 43 - 77 ^
-------
59
Aerator Evaluation
Assume steady state conditions and that the supplemental aeration
does not supply significant oxygen.
The following relation can be used to determine the rated
efficiency of the aerator:
N0 = N/ C.„ - Ct. x 1.02T"20 x oC
C20
where N0 = rated aerator output at 20°C, 1
atmosphere pressure, and 0 mg/1
DO, in lb 02/Hp-hr
N = aerator output at operating conditions,
lb 02/Hp-hr
C8W = DO saturation, mg/1 at temperature T
T = temperature, °C
CL = lagoon DO, mg/1
C20 = DO saturation at 20°C, mg/1
06 = transfer coeffient of waste/pure water
The aerator output at operating conditions N, can be computed
from the relation:
N = lb O2 = a' Lr + b1 Sa + BA
where a1 = lb O2 required per lb BOD5 removed
b' = lb O2 required per lb MLSS
Lr - lb BOD5 removed
B = bottom sludge oxygen demand, lb 02/day-ft
-------
60
a' = 0.6 and bj. = 0.28 x 1.0351"20, b7 2 = 0.18
Sa = 52 x 8.34 x 0.755 = 327 lb
Lr = (190-27) x 8.34 x 0.144 = 196 lb/day
B =1 mg/l/hr @ 20°C which = 0.00185 lb 02/day/ft2
Bt = B20 1.13t"20
B7<2 = (0.00185)(1.13)7*2"2°
= 0.00039 lb 02/day - ft2 at 7.2°C
A =TT * 1502/4 = 17,650 ft2
N = 0.6 x 196 + 0.18 x 327 + (0.00039)(17,650)
N =118+59+7
N = 184 lb 02/day per 5 Hp aerator
N = 1.53 lb 02/Hp-hr
Therefore, with
C8W = 12.14 mg/1
C2o = 9.17 mg/1
CL =3.5 mg/1
^ = assumed at 0.95
N0 = 1.54 12.14 - 3.50 x 1.027*2 " 20 x 0.95
9.17
N0 = 1.54/0.942 x 0.776 x 0.95
N0 = 1.54/0.695
-------
Assuming temperature rises to 20°C, the oxygen demand
would be calculated as,
L =190 = 18.5
1 + 0.034 x 52 x 5.25
Lr = (190 - 18.5)8.34 x 0.144 = 206 lb/day
b1 = 0.28
B = 0.00185
lb 02 required = 0.6 x 206 x 0.28 x 327 + 0.00185 x 17,650
= 123 +92+33
= 248 lb 02/day
Assuming a minimum oxygen level of 1.0 mg/1 should be
maintained in the lagoon,
N = 2.22 x 9.17 - 1.00 x 1.0 x 0.95
9.17
-------
62
Annual Cost Calculations
Annual Cost (Excluding Cost of Septic Tank)
Assuming an interest rate of 4%, and a structure life of
twenty-five years, costs adjusted with the ENR cost index.
Capital Costs
Stage 1
Stage 2
Total Cost
Annual Cost
1961 Cost = $30,000
ENR Cost in 1961 = $825
ENR Cost in 1965 = $950
Cost Adjustment factor = $1.15
Cost = $34,500
1965 Cost = $32,500
$67,000
$67,000 (erf. 4.25)
$67,000 x 0.06401 $4290
Operation-Maintenance Costs (Data from Table B-ll)
Power = 66 x 12 = $791/yr
Chlorine = 20.25 x 12 = $245/yr
Operation = 41.50 x 12 = $498/yr
Maintenance = 14.13 x 12=$170/yr $1704
Total Annual Costs
Cost/mg treated
Cost/lb BOD5 removed
$5994
$ 114
-------