g% fk United Stales Environmental Protection 540 / R-11/001 September 2011 The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program SUMMARY AND CLOSURE REPORT SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION ------- Cover Photos Clockwise from Top Left: Cement Lock Demonstration Plant, Bayonne, New Jersey (Source Endesco ciean Harbors sediment Decontamination Final Report July 2008) Evaluation of AquaBlokTM subaqueous contaminated sediment capping technology, Anacostia River, Washington, D C SITE Demonstration activities at Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant Lakefront site, Ashland, Wisconsin Steam Enhanced Remediation at the Port of Ridgefield, Washington ------- Notice The U S Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under our contract No EP-C-5-060 to RTI International, and performed by its subcontractor, Environmental Quality Management, Inc. This report has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. 11 ------- Foreword The U S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program is providmg data and technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future. The National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency's center for investigation of technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks from pollution that threaten human health and the environment The focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods and their cost-effectiveness for prevention and control of pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources, protection of water quality in public water systems, remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and groundwater, prevention and control of indoor air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public and private sector partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate emerging problems NRMRL's research provides solutions to environmental problems by developing and promoting technologies that protect and improve the environment; advancing scientific and engineering information to support regulatory and policy decisions; and providing the technical support and information transfer to ensure implementation of environmental regulations and strategies at the national, state, and community levels This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term research plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development to assist the user community and to link researchers with their clients. Sally Gutierrez, Director National Risk Management Research Laboratory 111 ------- This Page Intentionally Left Blank iv ------- Contents Notice 11 Foreword 111 Figures vi Tables vi Acronyms vn Executive Summary ix SITE Program Description and FY05 - FY09 Accomplishments 1 Background 1 Key Components of the SITE Program 1 The SITE Program Demonstration Process 2 Completed Demonstrations from FY05 - FY09 3 Detailed Description of Remediation Technology Demonstration Activities from FY05 - FY09 „ 4 AquaBlok® Subaqueous Cap .. 4 BioGenesisSM Soil and Sediment Washing Process 4 In Situ DUOX™ Chemical Oxidation Technology for Treatment of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater 6 Soil/GW XDD Potassium Permanganate In Situ Chemical Oxidation Discrete Zone Multi- Level Injection Strategy 6 Steam Enhanced Remediation at the Port of Ridgefield, Washington 7 Grand Plaza Site Investigation Using the Tnad Approach and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion 8 Thermo-Chemical Remediation Process for the Treatment of Contaminated Sediments for Beneficial Reuse - Cement-Lock® 9 Evaluation of Intermittent Up-Flow Anaerobic Bioreactor (IUFAB) 10 Controlled In Situ Chemical Oxidation (Cool-Ox™) 10 Conclusion 11 Acknowledgement 12 REFERENCES 13 Appendix 1 SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE 2 v ------- Figures Figure 1. SITE Program Process Flow 2 Figure 2. Silt curtains deployed during the Aquablok® SITE evaluation 4 Figure 3 DUOX™ technology deployment at Roosevelt Mills, Vernon. CT 6 Figure 4. SITE Program evaluation of in situ chemical oxidation at the former MEC Building site, Hudson, New Hampshire 7 Figure 5. Site schematic and photographs from the Grand Plaza vapor intrusion site investigation Figure 6. SITE Program evaluation of Cool-Ox™ technology at Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant Lakefront Site in Ashland, Wisconsin 11 Tables Table 1. SITE Program Projects Completed from FY2005 through FY2009 3 VI ------- Acronyms bgs Below ground surface CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act COC Contaminant of Concern DCE 1,1-dichloroethene DNAPL Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids DOD Department of Defense DOE Department of Energy EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERT Electrical Resistance Tomography ESTCP Environmental Security Technology Certification Program ETV Environmental Technology Verification FY Fiscal Year GW Ground Water GTI Gas Technology Institute ISCO In Situ Chemical Oxidation IUFAB Intermittent Up-Flow Anaerobic Bioreactor LRJS Lake River Industrial Site LRPCD Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division MGP Manufactured Gas Plant pg/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter Ug/L Micrograms per liter MMT Monitoring and Measurement Technology MSD Municipal Setting Designation NAPL Non-aqueous phase liquid NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NERL National Exposure Research Laboratory NJDCC New Jersey Residential or Non-Residential Direct Contact Soil Cleanup Criteria NPL National Priorities List NRMRL National Risk Management Research Laboratory NSFO Navy Special Fuel Oil O&M Operation and Maintenance ORD Office of Research and Development OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response PAH Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PCE Tetrachloroethylene PCP Pentachlorophenol Pg/g Picograms per gram POR Port of Ridgefield ppbv Parts per billion by volume RAO Remedial Action Objective RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RNWR Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SER Steam Enhanced Remediation SERDP Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Vll ------- Acronyms (Cont'd) SITE Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation SOD Soil Oxidant Demand SPLP Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure SVOC Semi-Volatile Organic Compound TCE Tnchloroethene TCDD T etrachlorodibenzodioxin TCDF T etrach lorodibenzofuran TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachmg Procedure use United States Code VI Vapor Intrusion voc Volatile Organic Compound XDD Xpert Design and Diagnostics Vlll ------- Executive Summary The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program successfully promoted the development, commercialization, and implementation of innovative hazardous waste treatment technologies for 20 years. SITE offered a mechanism for conducting joint technology demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the private sector, EPA, and other federal and state agencies The program provided environmental decision makers with relevant data on new and viable remediation technologies regarding performance or cost advantages compared to conventional treatment technologies The overall goal of the SITE Program was to carry out the development and demonstration of alternative or innovative treatment technologies applicable to response actions at cleanup sites to achieve long-term protection of human health and the environment. The SITE Program focused on the remediation needs of the hazardous waste remediation community through program planning, matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions, technology field demonstrations, and information dissemination. EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD) conducted the SITE Program through FY 2005 In FY 2006, ORD initiated closure of the SITE Program. Projects in the program at the start of closeout were completed in FY2006-2009 This report summarizes the progress and findings of the SITE Program from FY 2005 - FY 2009 and contains a listing of all projects completed during the program's history. The SITE Program's successful demonstration of 226 innovative remediation, monitoring, and measurement technologies provided hazardous waste site decision makers with high quality tools for cost-effective remediation. Thus, many of the technologies have progressed from innovative systems to proven technologies widely used throughout the remediation sector During this process, the SITE Program's emphasis was on developing technologies that treat contaminated soil in place (in situ), thereby eliminating the need for costly removal of the soil/groundwater for treatment/disposal off site The development of many proven commercially viable in situ technologies from fledgling, innovative remediation systems has been the principal accomplishment of the SITE Program. IX ------- SITE Program Description and FY05 - FY09 Accomplishments Background The SITE Program's central objective has been to provide decision makers evaluat- ing remedial options with credible perfor- mance data on innovative and enhanced commercial-ready environmental technolo- gies The program was created in 1986 in re- sponse to Congressional legislation to bring together technology developers, users, and EPA's credibility in a national testing pro- gram The SITE Program was established by the EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergen- cy Response (OSWER) and the Office of Re- search and Development (ORD) under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA, 1986). Among other activities, SARA called for an "Alternative or Innovative Treatment Technology Research and Demonstration Program." This program was to include technologies that permanently altered the chemical, biological, and physical processes, as well as the technologies that characterized and assessed the extent of con- tamination The legislation was also intended to accelerate the development and deployment of new technologies that were coming into the commercial market for possible alternatives to traditional methods such as pump-and-treat, land disposal, and incineration, or traditional laboratory methods for characterization and measurement of contamination The partner- ship between field measurement technologies and on-site remediation activities was ex- pected to reduce the overall cleanup costs and provide timely characterization data that al- lowed for better decision-making regarding removal of contamination. The SITE Program fulfilled the man- dates of SARA through technology evalua- tion, technology transfer, and other technical assistance for the rapid commercialization of innovative hazardous waste cleanup technol- ogies The SITE program sought to. 1) facili- tate acceptance of new technologies by state and federal regulators, 2) provide a sound scientific basis for evaluation of technologies, 3) provide reliable technology performance information, 4) support the use of verified technologies, 5) pool resources of federal and private partners, and 6) reduce the amount of time required to achieve routine use of effec- tive technologies. The SITE Program was EPA's first technology verification program and it has served as a model for subsequent evaluation programs Funding for the SITE Program ended in 2006. Projects remaining in the pro- gram were completed by the end of 2009. The SITE Program evaluated 226 innovative tech- nologies, 168 for site remediation and 58 for measurement monitoring and characterization over this 23-year period. Key Components of the SITE Program The SITE Program was comprised of a Demonstration Program, a Monitoring and Measurement Technology (MMT) Program, and information transfer. The SITE Program contained an Emerging Technology Program component that operated from 1987 until 1998. SITE offered a mechanism for conduct- ing joint technology demonstration and evalu- ation projects at hazardous waste sites through the involvement of the private sector, EPA, and other federal and state agencies The SITE Demonstration Program evaluated innovative technologies at selected hazardous waste sites to provide reliable per- formance, cost, and applicability information for site cleanup. The MMT Program eva- luated technologies that detect, monitor, and measure hazardous and toxic substances to provide more cost-effective and accurate me- 1 ------- thods for producing real-time data during site characterization and remediation. Information transfer activities provided developers, re- mediation site managers, and other decision makers with informative performance and cost data intended to diminish market barriers to regulatory and market acceptance of tech- nologies. The Emerging Technology Program promoted the development of bench and pilot scale technologies to accelerate their devel- opment to the demonstration phase. The technical staff at EPA ORD's Na- tional Risk Management Research Lab- oratory (NRMRL) in Cincinnati, Ohio ma- naged the SITE Demonstration Program since its inception The Monitoring and Measure- ment Technology Program was managed by technical staff at ORD's National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL) in Las Vegas, Nevada The SITE Program Demonstration Process Figure 1 presents the basic elements of the SITE Program process flow It is impor- tant to note that stakeholder involvement and peer review are critical components of each phase of the process The SITE Program direction and strat- egies were evaluated each year based on input from the user community and other public- and private-sector stakeholders to ensure that the program continued to focus on evaluating the most sought-after remediation technolo- gies. SITE received input from EPA program offices, regional offices, other federal agen- cies, and stakeholders in assessing the needs for technologies and tools for site remedia- tion. Program Planning EPA created partnerships with respon- sible parties who own or operate contami- nated sites and who support field evaluations of new technologies at those locations Sites were prioritized based on demonstration needs of the user community and research fo- cus areas identified during the strategic plan- ning process SITE annually solicited applications for participation in the program from those responsible for cleanup operations at hazard- ous waste sites. A peer review panel com- posed of scientists, engineers, and other envi- ronmental experts reviewed applications to identify those technologies that best represent solutions to the most pressing environmental problems. Alternatively, technologies were added to the program at the request of EPA program offices and regional offices. EPA SITE, with assistance from the technology developers and contaminated site stakeholders, prepared a demonstration plan which addressed the elements necessary to generate high quality technology performance verification data. These elements include a sampling and analysis plan, a health and safe- ty plan, and a data quality assurance/quality control plan. Field demonstration, the major ele- ment of the technology evaluation process, included performance data collected in the field to verify the technology's ability to re- mediate the contaminants present, documenta- tion of technology performance and problems encountered, descriptions of waste products generated and any management problems they pose, and costs Technology Transfer Technology Demonstration • Strategic planing to identify technology needs • Site selection • Technology selection Figure 1. SITE Program Process Flow • Demonstration plan preparation • Sample collection • Field demonstration • Data analysis/reduction • Report preparation • Peer review 2 ------- Nearly all SITE Program demonstra- tions involved evaluation of the classic data quality parameters of precision, accuracy, comparability, and completeness Where possible, standard statistical analysis me- thods were used in the evaluation of the demonstration data (Billets, 2007) The development of reports and technical documents generated by the SITE Program was subject to the peer review process. The reports were reviewed by a technical panel consisting of EPA and non- EPA reviewers, and the reports received EPA administrative review Once finalized, the reports were published through the SITE program and NERL websites. The SITE Program's information transfer activities were considered critical to SITE's ability to disseminate information collected by the demonstration and MMT programs. Data and results of SITE activi- ties were further distributed in technical re- ports, presentations, and journal articles In- formation transfer activities include: 1) pro- gram-specific brochures, 2) exhibits, 3) con- ferences, 4) workshops and technical writmg groups, 5) technology databases accessible online, and 6) focused technical assistance to EPA regions, states, and remedial con- tractors. Program reports are posted at www.epa.gov/nrmrl/lrpcd/site/reports.html A list of innovative remediation and monitoring/measurement technology dem- onstration projects conducted under the SITE Program are presented by developer state in the Appendix. Completed Demonstrations from FY05 - FY09 The SITE Demonstration Program completed nine demonstrations of treatment technologies m FY 05-09 The Monitoring and Measurement Technology (MMT) Pro- gram completed demonstrations of five technologies and one approach to characte- rizing the extent of soil, water, and gas con- tamination. The completed demonstrations are presented in Table 1, and a more detailed description of the demonstrations follow Table 1. SIT! £ Program Projects Completed From FY2005 through FY2009 Developer Demonstration Site Location Year of Completion Port of Ridgefield Evaluation of steam-enhanced remediation Ridgefield, WA 2005 Various developers Demonstration of 5 XRF technologies (Measurement and Monitoring Technologies Program) Kennedy Space Center, FL 2005 BioGenesis Sediment washing Bayonne, NJ 2006 AquaBlok^/ EPA Hazardous Substance Research Center Southwest Q!) AquaBIok subaqueous cap Anacostia River, Washington, DC 2006 USEPA/OSWER Triad site characterization of vapor intrusion Grand Plaza Shopping Center, Dallas, TX 2006 XDD In situ chemical oxidation Former MEC Building, Hudson, NH 2006 Newfields Corporation 1 M Cool-Ox technology Ashland Lakefront / Northern States Power, Ashland, WI 2007 University of Connecticut TM Evaluation of DUOX (dual oxidation) technology for remediation of chlorinated organics Vemon, CT 2007 GTI Evaluation of treatment of PCB- contaminated sediments for beneficial reuse - Cement-Lock® Technology Bayonne, NJ 2007 University of Hawaii Evaluation of intermittent up-flow anaerobic bioreactor (IUFAB) Pearl Harbor, HI 2008 3 ------- Detailed Description of Remediation Tech- nology Demonstration Activities from FY05 - FY09 AquaBlok" Subaqueous Cap AquaBlok® is a patented, composite- aggregate technology used to manage conta- minated sediment in situ. The material is comprised of a central core, clay or clay-sized materials, and polymers. The material acts to reduce movement of dissolved contaminants into the water column. Application of the product generally involves applying dry masses of the material through water and across the surface of contaminated sediments. The AquaBlok® technology was part of a SITE Program investigation of innovative capping technologies for risk management of contaminated sediments. This demonstration was conducted at Anacostia River, Washing- ton, D.C. Sediments in the Anacostia River are contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphe- nyls (PCBs), heavy metals, and other chemi- cals to levels that have hindered commercial, industrial, and recreational uses. Stretches of the Anacostia River are listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) of Superfund sites (i.e. CERCLA). The overall goal of the AquaBlok® demonstration was to evaluate the efficacy of AquaBlok® for management of contaminated sediment sites. Figure 2. Silt curtains deployed during the Aquablok® SITE evaluation. (R) The overall results of the AquaBlok SITE demonstration indicated that the Aqua- 4 Blok* material is highly stable, and likely more stable than traditional sand capping ma- terial even under very high bottom shear stresses. The AquaBlok® material is also cha- racteristically more impermeable than tradi- tional sand capping material, and the weight of evidence gathered suggests it is potentially more effective at controlling contaminant flux than traditional sand capping material. Aq- uaBlok® also appears to be characterized by environmental impacts to benthos and benthic habitats that are generally similar to tradition- al sand capping material. AquaBlok® thus appears to have ap- plicability to a segment of contaminated se- diment sites in the U.S., depending on site characteristics, such as depth of sediment and velocity of stream/currents. Relative to other typical sediment capping materials (e.g., sand), AquaBlok® would tend to be more costly. However, given its impermeability and other physical characteristics, an AquaBlok® cap could potentially require less thickness to achieve remedial action objectives (RAOs), which would offset some of the additional cost of the material itself (U.S. EPA, 2007a). Contaminated sediments are present in 70% of the U.S. watersheds and in 552 NPL sites that can be identified as streams, lakes, rivers, marshes, canals, ponds, reservoirs, harbors, and coastal areas in the East, Mid- west, and West. The most frequently occur- ring sediment contaminants are PCBs, heavy metals, PAHs, pesticides, mercury, dioxins, and other organics. Total estimated volume of surficial-contaminated sediment is over 1 billion cubic meters. (U.S. EPA, 2008a). BioGenesisSM Soil and Sediment Washing Process The BioGenesisSM Soil and Sediment Washing Process is an ex situ technology which may prove to be a cost-effective tech- nology applicable to excavated contaminated soil and dredged contaminated sediment. BioGenesis developed the BioGenesisSM Soil and Sediment Washing technology to treat sediment contaminated with a variety of or- ------- game and inorganic contaminants. The tech- nology uses patented equipment and proprie- tary chemicals to clean soils, sediments, and sludges contaminated with orgamc and inor- ganic constituents by facilitating the transfer of orgamc and inorganic contaminants from contaminated sediment to water The tech- nology extracts metals, volatile and non- volatile hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocar- bons, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, and most other organics from nearly every soil and sediment type, including clay Screened and diluted raw sediment is mixed with proprietary specialty chemicals such as complex surfactants, chelating agents, and defoamers These specialty chemicals decrease the affinity among the contaminants, sediment solids, and naturally occurring bio- mass The mixture is next pumped to a pre- processor unit where high pressure jets dis- aggregate sediment particles and biomass, fractionating the biomass. Next the impacts from a collision chamber strip the biofilm layer from the solids particles and transfer the biomass and contaminates into an aqueous phase. Hydrogen peroxide is then added to the slurry prior to the cavitation/oxidation system resulting m organic molecules break- ing down to carbon dioxide and water The resulting slurry consists of inorganic sediment particles, suspended organic biomass contain- ing residual orgamc contaminants, and water that contain the majority of the contaminants (mainly inorgamc) that have been desorbed from the sediment particles and biomass. Fol- lowing solid/liquid separation with a hydro- cyclone, wet screening, and centnfugation; the clean sediment solids are stock piled The aqueous phase is processed through a waste- water treatment system. A full-scale conti- nuous-flow unit cleans sand, silt, clay, and sludge particles smaller than 63 microns at a rate of 10 to 40 cubic yards per hour. Extrac- tion efficiencies per wash cycle range from 60 to 99%. The primary objective of the BioGe- nesisSM soil and sediment washing technology evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of the process to reduce the contaminants of concern (COCs) in sediment from the Lower Passaic River to levels that meet New Jersey Residential or Non-Residential Direct Contact Soil Cleanup Criteria (NJDCC) at the 95 per- cent confidence interval The BioGenesisSM process was eva- luated from May 2 to May 4, 2006. BioGene- sis treated approximately 10,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment that originated from the Harrison Reach of the Lower Passaic Riv- er in New Jersey. The shoreline of the Lower Passaic River is highly urbanized and has a long history of industrialization, which has resulted in degraded water quality, sediment contamination, loss of wetlands, and aban- doned or under-utilized properties Data from the results of the demon- stration indicate that all COCs including PCBs, metals, and SVOCs were below the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy's Cleanup Standards for Contaminated Sites Criteria for Residen- tial and Non-residential Direct Contact for Soil except for benzo(a)anthracene, ben- zo(b)fluoranthene, and crysine which met the non-residential direct contact standards but were above criteria for residential direct con- tact for soil. Benzo[a]pyrene was the only chemical that exceeded the non-residential standard 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF averaged 464.00 and 84 90 pg/g, respectively There have been 857 soil- and 349 se- diment-contaminated NPL sites remediated for various contaminants by both traditional and innovative technologies (U.S. EPA, 2008a) There are an estimated 2,847 soil- contaminated cleanup sites yet to be cleaned up in the U.S. (U.S. EPA, 2009a). The Bio- SM Genesis Soil and Sediment Washing Process is an ex situ technology with applica- bilty to management of excavated contami- nated soil and dredged contaminated sedi- ment. 5 ------- In Situ DUOX™ Chemical Oxidation Technology for Treatment of Contami- nated Soil and Groundwater The DUOX™ technology utilizes a combination of two types of oxidants to de- stroy unsaturated chlorinated solvents. The oxidants belong to the persulfate and perman- ganate families of inorganic compounds. The most economical oxidants from each class of oxidants are sodium persulfate (Na2S20g) and potassium permanganate (KMn04). This in situ chemical oxidation process involves in- jecting a solution of one or more oxidants in series or simultaneously into the subsurface to mineralize the target contaminants. The DUOX™ technology, developed by research- ers at the Environmental Research Institute at the University of Connecticut, is an in situ oxidation process that neutralizes chlorinated organic chemicals. Figure 3. DUOX™ technology deployment at Roosevelt Mills, Vernon. CT. The demonstration yielded the follow- ing conclusions: • The near-surface fill material [source area matrix for tetrachloroethylene (PCE)] ex- hibited a very low soil oxidant demand. • Permanganate alone and in combination with persulfate was effective in reducing the levels of chlorinated solvents in the site groundwater as well as in spiked soil samples simulating a free-phase globular distribution. • Persulfate alone was ineffective in reduc- ing the levels of chlorinated solvents in any of the experiments. Based on these conclusions, the chlo- rinated solvent contamination in both the soil and groundwater can be effectively treated by using permanganate as an oxidant. Due to the low soil oxidant demand (SOD) of the soil (near-surface fill), however, the use of a dual oxidant approach (DUOX™) is unnecessary. Persulfate would only be necessary if there were a need to expend the SOD before using a more costly oxidant such as permanganate (U.S. EPA, 2005). Soil/GW XDD Potassium Permanganate In Situ Chemical Oxidation Discrete Zone Multi-Level Injection Strategy Permanganate has been used for over 50 years to oxidize metals and organic chemi- cals in drinking water and wastewater treat- ment. The Xpert Design and Diagnostics (XDD) in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) technology was evaluated at the former MEC Building site in Hudson New Hampshire for its ability to destroy chlorinated ethenes oc- curring as a dissolved or non-aqueous phase. Soil and groundwater at the site are contami- nated with chlorinated volatile organic com- pounds (VOCs). The VOCs are primarily perchloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), and cis-l,2-dichloroethylene, (cDCE). Post-treatment data from the MEC Building site suggest significant groundwater and soil VOC mass reductions in discrete zones receiving appreciable amounts of per- manganate. Results for PCE (the primary contaminant) include: • Average soil PCE concentration decrease of 94% in intermediate (peat) and deep (sandy silt) zone. • Groundwater PCE concentration decrease between 86% and 99% in four to five deep (sandy silt) zone monitoring wells. 6 ------- The average final groundwater con- centrations were below the site-specific re- mediation performance standards for PCE, TCE, and 1,1-dichloroethene (DCE). Figure 4. SITE Program evaluation of in situ chemical oxidation at the former MEC Building site, Hudson, New Hampshire. Lesser reductions, and in some cases increases, in groundwater VOC concentra- tions were observed in the shallow zone as a result of the limited amount of oxidant deli- vered to this unit ( U.S. EPA, 2007b). Approximately 70% of NPL, RCRA Corrective Action, DOD, and DOE sites in- volve groundwater and/or soil contamination (U.S. EPA, 2004). Based on the results of the technical aspects of the demonstration, in situ chemical oxidation has potential applicability to these sites. Steam Enhanced Remediation at the Port of Ridgefield, Washington Steam Enhanced Remediation em- ploys steam injection at the periphery of the contaminated area to heat permeable sub- surface areas, vaporize volatile compounds bound to the soil, and drive contaminants to centrally located vapor and liquid extraction wells. Progress is monitored by underground imaging, primarily Electrical Resistance To- mography (ERT) and temperature monitoring, which delineates the heated area and tracks the steam fronts daily to ensure total cleanup and precise process control. The Port Of Ridgefield is a 57-square mile port district located along the lower Co- lumbia River, approximately 15 miles north of Vancouver, Washington. The Lake River Industrial Site (LRIS) comprises approx- imately 40 acres of land within the port dis- trict. The LRIS is bordered to the east by the City of Ridgefield, to the southwest by Lake River (a tributary to the Columbia River), to the north and northwest by the Ridgefield Na- tional Wildlife Refuge (RNWR). The LRIS contained facilities for treat- ing milled lumber, utility poles, and pilings. Investigations have since documented the presence of pentachlorophenol (PCP), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), copper, chro- mium, and arsenic at the site. SteamTech Environmental Services (SteamTech) developed a plan for applying steam enhanced remediation (SER), prepared a design for the remediation system at the LRIS, and installed approximately 75 percent of the system before POR took full control of the project. POR installed the remaining por- tion of the system. The POR and its contrac- tors are operating the system. Objectives of the SITE Program eval- uation of SER at the LRIS included determi- nation of the technology's ability to measura- bly reduce the concentrations of contaminants of concern (COCs) in the source area, and evaluation of the ability of the SER technolo- gy to control the immediate risk of contami- nant migration into Carty Lake and the RNWR. Firm conclusions could not be drawn at the end of the demonstration as post- treatment collection of samples in the source area had not been conducted and the existing data had not been thoroughly evaluated. A preliminary review of the groundwater data suggested that contamination outside of the steam injection area had not increased since SER was implemented. Thus, the concern that SER could potentially mobilize contami- nation and cause migration of the contamina- 7 ------- tion into previously uncontaminated areas does not appear to have materialized. Prelim- inary data indicated that the SER was remov- ing significant amounts of contamination from the subsurface (EPA, 2006a). The first phase of full-scale operation was initiated on one acre in 2006 with plans to sequentially remediate three additional 1- acre subareas by 2013-2015. As of December 2009, SER implementation had removed ap- proximately 23,900 gallons of NAPL and ful- ly treated approximately 110 million gallons of groundwater for surface water discharge Approximately 465 tons of sludge had also been generated through the liquid treatment system and disposed at an offsite hazardous waste landfill (U.S. EPA, 2010). Comparison of contaminant concen- trations in system influent collected during the first three months of treatment with influ- ent data gathered in late 2009 indicates signif- icant contaminant reductions, greater than 99.4% for benzene (originally 50 |ig/L), 97.7% for pentachlorophenol (PCP) (original- ly 7,500 ng/L), 99.8% for naphthalene (origi- nally 18,000 ng/L), 90 6% for tetrachloroe- thene (originally 30 (ig/L), and 49% for arsen- ic (originally 80 (ig/L) In addition, dissolved concentrations of PCP and all other COCs that were historically detected in the upper water-bearing zone beneath Carty Lake were no longer detected and plume migration to- ward Carty Lake and the Lake River had halted (U.S. EPA, 2010b). The preliminary results and successful applications at other sites mdicate that steam- enhanced remediation may be an applicable, cost-effective technology at sites with volatile and semi-volatile organic contaminants. Grand Plaza Site Investigation Using the Triad Approach and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion Vapor intrusion (VI) is the migration of gas phase chemicals from the subsurface into buildings or other structures The Triad approach was implemented and demonstrated between April and August of 2005 to charac- terize the extent of soil, groundwater, and soil gas contamination at the Grand Plaza Shop- ping Center in Dallas, Texas. These data were used to assess the impact on indoor air due to vapor intrusion. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), tn-chloroethylene, and cis-1,2- dichloroethylene were detected in all media, with PCE as the prevalent compound. The on-site analyses for PCE were 22% higher than the off-site analyses for me- thanol extracts from soil samples. For the shallow soil gas samples, the on-site results for PCE agreed with the off-site analyses within about one order of magnitude for the sample pairs where PCE was present at con- centrations greater than 10 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) The off-site results for the sub-slab soil gas samples were several orders of magnitude higher than the on-site results, perhaps due to recognized variability in the sampling and analysis of soil gas samples at these concentrations. The geology was inter- preted from the boreholes and logs from pre- viously drilled groundwater monitoring wells. All data indicated a small PCE hot spot that was roughly 40 feet by 40 feet The hot spot was shallow (fewer than 10 feet [3 meters] below ground surface [bgs]) on top of a low- permeability clay under the southwestern edge of the building where a dry-cleaning fa- cility was once located 8 ------- Figure 5. Site schematic and photographs from the Grand Plaza vapor intrusion site investigation The risk from inhalation of PCE at this site was conservatively estimated to be 2xl0"5, based on an inhalation unit risk for PCE of 3.0xl0"6 per |ig/m3 and a 25-year oc- cupational exposure scenario. A control sys- tem was designed as part of this study and it will be taken into consideration if necessary. Future steps to achieve site closure may in- volve seeking a Municipal Setting Designa- tion (MSD) or a deed restriction for the site (U.S. EPA, 2006b). Thermo-Chemical Remediation Process for the Treatment of Contaminated Sediments for Beneficial Reuse - Cement- Lock® The Cement-Lock® technology is a thermo-chemical remediation process that was developed to remediate contaminated ma- terials (ex situ) and generate a material (Eco- melt®) that can be used as a partial replace- ment for Portland cement in the production of concrete. As such, Ecomelt® can be a market- able beneficial use product. The Cement Lock® technology was evaluated for its appli- cability to the treatment of contaminated se- diments dredged from waterways and its ability to produce a value added product. Contaminated sediment dredged from the Stratus Petroleum site near the confluence of the Passaic River and Newark Bay as well as the Harrison Reach of the Lower Passaic Riv- er in New Jersey was treated using the Ce- ment-Lock*1 process. Tests were conducted in collaboration with USEPA Region 2 and the New Jersey Department of Transportation Of- fice of Maritime Resources in a demonstra- tion scale Cement Lock® plant located in Bayonne,New Jersey. One confirmation test and two ex- tended duration tests were conducted. During the confirmation test, a total of 5.1 tons of dewatered sediment/modifier mixture was fed into the system which yielded 3.3 tons of Ecomelt®. The sediment had been previously mixed with inorganic modifiers in the propor- tions required to make Ecomelt®. During the extended duration tests, a total of 31.6 tons of Passaic River sediment and modifiers were (R) processed. During Cement Lock processing, the sediment/modifier mixture is heated to temperatures in the range of 2400° to 2600° F and brought to a molten homogenous state resembling lava. The molten lava-like ma- terial flows out of the melter and upon cool- ing and granulation is converted to Ecomelt®. Operational problems and funding limitations prevented the processing of additional materi- al (Gas Technology Institute, 2008a). Samples of the feed material and the Ecomelt® product were collected and ana- lyzed for contaminants of concern. The Ecomelt* product samples from the extended duration campaigns show greater than 99 per- cent treatment efficiency for the contaminants of concern including PCBs plus dio- xins/furans. Ecomelt® samples show very lit- tle leachability when subjected to either the TCLP (toxicity characteristic leaching proce- dure or the SPLP (synthetic precipitation leaching procedure). After the demonstration project the Ecomelt" and remaining Stratus Petroleum site sediment (about 105.4 tons) were beneficially reused as geotechnical fill. The remaining Passaic River sediment (which had not been processed) could not be benefi- cially used because PCB and dioxin/furan 9 ------- concentrations exceeded the land disposal limits (Gas Technology Institute, 2008a). Ecomelt® from the Passaic River sediment processing was used in producing concrete poured for a sidewalk at Montclair State Uni- versity, as part of a sustainable campus land- scape design project in 2009 The technology is potentially applica- ble to a variety of hazardous wastes such as dredged sediments, soils, sludge, municipal solid wastes, municipal solid wastes, auto shredder residue (auto fluff), debris from brownfields projects, chemical wastes, and mcinerator ash and residues An economic analysis of the Cement-Lock® technology in- dicated that costs can vary considerably and are sensitive to several factors, including tip- ping fees (received for processing the sedi- ment/wastes), capital amortization period, plant capacity utilization, and fuel (natural gas) cost. Co-processing sediment with other wastes with calorific value significantly im- prove the overall economics by reducing the net fuel cost (Gas Technology Institute, 2008b). Evaluation of Intermittent Up-Flow Anae- robic Bioreactor (IUFAB) Dawson Group, Inc. (Dawson) has developed an anaerobic biological treatment system to treat oil contaminated with polych- lonnated biphenyls (PCBs) The U S. Envi- ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) Super- fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program, in partnership with Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Pacific, evaluated this technology. The pur- pose of the evaluation was to demonstrate the technology's ability to anaerobically biode- grade PCBs and to confirm the applicability of this technology to remove PCBs from waste oils. The overall technology evaluation was conducted in phases to optimize use of re- sources. Laboratory-scale tests were con- ducted at the University of Hawaii (UH) (the first phase) beginning in 2002 The second phase included bench-scale testing in conti- nuously operated bioreactors. EPA verifica- tion sampling indicated that the bench-scale test reactors removed PCBs from the waste oil The third phase was planned to incorpo- rate pilot-scale testing of an Intermittent Up- Flow Anaerobic Bioreactor (IUFAB) adjacent to Oscar 2 Pier on Hospital Point at Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, Hawaii This IUFAB was successfully constructed, operated, main- tained, evaluated for performance, and dis- mantled The operation and maintenance (O&M) activities successfully biodegraded PCB-contaminated Navy special fuel oil (NSFO) The PCB concentrations in the re- covered NFSO sources exceeded the 2.0 mg/kg requirement for on-island treatment and disposal. For the IUFAB technology, as demonstrated in this pilot-scale study, the production-scale operations would likely be cost-prohibitive to most treatment scenarios Thus, combined with the pilot system's oily wastewater discharge, continuing the pursuit toward production-scale operation was not recommended (NAVFEC, 2009). Controlled In Situ Chemical Oxidation (Cool-Ox™) The Controlled In Situ Chemical Oxi- dation (Cool-Ox ) technology was developed by Deep Earth Technologies. According to the vendor, the chemical formulation of Cool- Ox™ destroys organic contamination by means of chemical oxidation followed by ac- celerated biodegradation, generating surfac- tants that mobilize contaminants, without the addition of catalyzing agents. The process is based on the use of solid peroxygens in aqueous suspension This SITE demonstra- tion evaluated the Cool-Ox™ technology's ability to treat dense non-aqueous phase liq- uids (DNAPL) in situ at the Ashland Manu- factured Gas Plant Lakefront Site in Ashland, Wisconsin in 2006 - 2007 and to enhance biodegradation in the vicinity of this former gas holder This demonstration also evaluated the ability of the technology to mobilize DNAPL and enhance product recovery of the interim free product recovery system. Con- taminants of concern include benzene, tolu- ------- ene, ethylbenzene, benzo(a)pyrene, naphtha- lene, pyrene, and phenanthrene. Figure 6. SITE Program evaluation of Cool-Ox™ technology at Ashland Manu- factured Gas Plant Lakefront Site in Ash- land, Wisconsin Conclusions of the demonstration are summa- rized below: • Concentrations of contaminants of con- cern (COCs) were overall reduced in the treatment area. • Testing indicates that hydrogen peroxide was still present in the subsurface more than 30 days after treatment was com- plete. The ability of the solid peroxygens suspended in water to penetrate fine- grained matrices is unclear. • Native bacteria do not appear to have been harmed by the treatment, and the popula- tions of hydrocarbon degraders appear to have increased as a consequence of treat- ment (U.S. EPA 2009b). Conclusion Through the effective implementation of innovative remediation options, the SITE Program served to promote the development, evaluation, and deployment of innovative ha- zardous waste measurement, monitoring, and treatment technologies. The Program pro- vided environmental decision makers with data required to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of innovative remediation technol- ogies and contributed to regulatory and public acceptance of a broad range of options for cleaning up some of the nation's most chal- lenging hazardous waste sites. The SITE Program generated scientific data regarding the nature of environmental contamination and its behavior in the natural environment, which improved the ability of engineers and scientists to design systems that target specif- ic contaminants, or be applied in challenging geologic and hydro-geologic conditions. Due in part to SITE Program influence over the past two decades, dozens of technol- ogies once considered innovative have be- come part of conventional standard remedies at hazardous waste sites. Beneficial outcomes of the SITE Program include: • Protecting human health by reducing con- taminant exposure. • Increasing deployment rates of innovative environmental treatment technologies. • Reducing program costs to federal agen- cies through resource leveraging, collabo- ration, and cost sharing. • Generating scientific data for regulatory decision making and technology devel- opment. • Creating private-sector benefits through public-private partnerships. • Contributing to land revitalization in local communities by converting unusable commercial and industrial properties back to productive real estate. • Fostering the export of innovative tech- nologies to over 37 countries through in- ternational technology transfer and the U.S/German Bilateral Agreement (U.S. EPA 2008b). The SITE program accomplishments are in large measure due to successful scien- tific partnerships with others. SITE became a model, collaborator, or contributor to many scientific programs including the EPA Envi- ronmental Technology Verification Program (ETV), the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), and the 11 ------- Environmental Security and Technology Cer- tification Program (ESTCP). Many of the out- comes such as increasing use of innovative technologies, increasing market share for technology developers, and using public- private partnerships to resolve technological challenges, have served as a model for other state and federal environmental programs. In addition, the SITE Program staff effectively leveraged EPA resources through collabora- tive research with other federal agencies, state and tribal governments, and other countries Acknowledgement The authors acknowledge the contri- butions of all EPA SITE Program managers to the success of the SITE Demonstration and Monitoring and Measurement Technology Programs- Ronald Hill, Donald Sanning, Ro- bert A Olexsey, Stephen James, Norma Lew- is, John F Martin, Annette Gatchett, Randy A Parker, and Ten Richardson of the SITE Demonstration Program; and Eric Koglin, Larry Jack, and Stephen Billets of the Moni- toring and Measurement Technologies Pro- gram 12 ------- REFERENCES Billets, 2007. Billets S., and Dindal A. History and Accomplishments of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Superfiind Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Monitoring and Measurement Technology (MMT) Program. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol 35, No 5. CERCLA, 1980 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) public law 96-510, 42 USC 9601 et seq 94 stat 2767, December 11, 1980. Gas Technology Institute, 2008a. Sediment Decontamination Demonstration Program-Cement Lock® Technology Final Report, July 2008. Gas Technology Institute, 2008b. Cement-Lock® Technology for Decontaminating Dredged Estuanne Sediments Topical Report on Beneficial Use of Ecomelt from Passaic River Sediment at Montclair State University, New Jersey, April 2008 NAVFEC, 2009 Development/Design of Innovative Bioreactor Technology for the Treatment of PCB-Contaminated Oil, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, CTD 0002, June 2009 SARA, 1986. Superfiind Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). Public Law 99-499, 100 stat 1615, October 17, 1986 U S. EPA, 2004. Cleaning up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends, 2004 edition, EPA/542/R-04/015, September 2004. U.S. EPA, 2005 In Situ DUOX Chemical Oxidation Technology to Treat Chlorinated Organics at the Roosevelt Mills Site, Vernon, CT, Site Characterization and Treatability Report, EPA/540/R-05/008, July 2005. U.S EPA, 2006a. Summary Report" Port of Ridgefield Steam Enhanced Remediation, EPA SITE Program, August 2006. U S. EPA, 2006b. Grand Plaza Site Investigation Using the TRIAD Approach and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion, EPA/540/R-07/002, September 2006. U.S EPA, 2007a. Demonstration of the AquaBlok™ Sediment Capping Technology, EPA/540/R-07/008, September 2007. U.S. EPA, 2007b. Xpert Design and Diagnostics (XDD) In Situ Chemical Oxidation Process Using Potassium Permanganate (KMn04), EPA/540/R-07/005, May 2007. U.S. EPA, 2008a. NPL 2008. US EPA National Priority List Sites, website accessed April 21, 2008. http.//www epa.eov/superfiind sites/npl. U S. EPA, 2008b. U S. German Bilateral Agreement, website accessed April 21, 2008: http://www epa.gov/nrmrl/lrpcd/site/bla.html U.S. EPA, 2009a. NPL 2009. U.S EPA National Priority List Sites, website accessed September 21, 2009. http.//www epa.gov/superfund.sites/npl. 13 ------- REFERENCES (Cont'd) U.S. EPA 2009b. Cool-Ox™ Technology Demonstration at Ashland MGP Lakefront Site, SITE Program Report, March 2009. U.S. EPA, 2010. Technology News and Trends accessed at http://www clu- m org/PRODUCTS/NEWSLTRS/tnandt/view cfm9issue=0610 cfm#3. August 2010. SITE Program Reports Website Address http://www epa.gov/nrmrl/lrpcdysite/reports html. 14 ------- Appendix SITE PROJECTS (Alphabetically by Developer State) 1 ------- SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE Developer Technology Contact Program Status Mrfbmrm CMS Research Corporation Birmingham, AL Portable Gas Chromatograph H Ashley Page 205-773-6911 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 Arctic Foundations Anchorage, AK Freeze Barrier Ed Yarmak 907-562-2741 Demonstration Completed 1998 Bnce Environmental Service Corp (BESCORP) Fairbanks, AK Soil Washing Plant Craig Jones 907-452-2512 Demonstration Completed 1992 AuQmouii Anzona State University Tempe, AZ Photocatalytic Oxidation and Air Stripping Gregory Raupp 606-965-2828 Elliot Berman 352-867-1320 Emerging Technology Completed 1999 STC Omega (formerly Silicate Technology Corporation) Scottsdale, AZ Solidification and Stabilization Treatment Stephen Pelger Scott Larsen 602-948-7100 Demonstration Completed 1990 (QrfflTmnftn Analytical and Remedial Technology, Inc , Milpitas, CA Automated Sampling and Analytical Platform Gary Hopkins 408-263-8931 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1991 ARCO La Palma, CA Lime Lagoons Baffy Duff 406-563-5211 Demonstration Completed 2004 Berkeley Environmental Restoration Center (formerly Udell Technologies, Inc) Emeryville, CA In Situ Enhanced Extraction Kent Udell 510-642-2928 Steve Collins 510-643-1300 Demonstration Completed 1993 Binax Corp, Antox Division Sunnyville, CA Immunoassay for PCB in Soil Richard Lankow 408-752-1353 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 COGNIS, Inc Santa Rosa, CA Biological Chemical Treatment Steve Rock U S EPA 513-569-7149 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Eco Mat, Inc Hayward, CA Biological Denitnfication Kim Halley 510-783-5885 Demonstration Completed 2000 2 ------- Develop er Technology Contact Program Status (.'iilirorniii (tonliniicd) Energy and Environmental Research Corporation Irvine, CA Hybrid Fluidized Bed System Richard Koppang 714-859-8851 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Energy and Environmental Research Corporation Irvine, CA Reactor Filter System Neil Widmer 714-859-8851 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Environmental Biotech- nologies Montara, CA Microbial Composting Douglas Mun- necke 415-596-1020 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1999 EPOC Water, Inc Fresno, CA Precipitation, Microfiltra- tion, Sludge Dewatenng Scott Jackson 209-291-8144 Demonstration Completed 1993 General Atomics (former- ly Ogden Environmental Services) San Diego, CA Circulating Bed Combus- ter Robert Goforth 619-455-2499 Demonstration Completed 1989 Acoustic Barrier Separator Anthony Gattuso 619-455-2910 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Geokinetics Berkeley, CA Electrokinetics Steven Clark 510-704-2940 Demonstration Completed 2000 Geokinetics Berkeley, CA Closed Loop Lead Recov- ery Steven Clark 510-704-2940 Demonstration Completed 2002 Geokinetics & Duke En- gineering Berkeley, CA Electrokinetic Heating & Surfactant Flushing Steven Clark 510-704-2940 Demonstration Completed 1999 GIS\Solutions, Inc Concord, CA GISMCey Environmental Data Management Software Garry Reid 510-827-5400 Demonstration Completed 1993 Groundwater T echnology Government Services, Inc Concord, CA Biological Composting Ronald Hicks 510-671-2387 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Hughes Environmental Systems, Inc Manhattan Beach, CA Steam Enhanced Recovery Process Paul De Percin US EPA 513-569-7797 Demonstration Completed 1993 Integrated Water Re- sources, Inc Santa Barbara, CA Stripping of TCE 805-565-0996 Demonstration Completed 2002 Lockheed Martin Missiles & Space Co , Inc Palo Alto, CA Electrokinetic Remediation Steven H Schwartzkopf 415-424-3176 Demonstration Completed 1995 Magnum Water Technology El Segundo, CA CAV-OX Process Dale Cox 310-322-4143 Jack Simser 310-640-7000 Demonstration Completed 1993 3 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Qilit'oniiii (continued) Membrane Technology and Research, lnc Menlo Park, CA VaporSep Membrane Process Marc Jacobs Doug Gottschlich 415-328-2228 Emerging Technology Completed 1991 North American Technologies Aprotek San Ramon, CA Oleofilter Cathryn Wimberly 916-366-6185 Demonstration Completed 1994 NOVATERRA, lnc (formerly Toxic Treatments USA, lnc) Los Angeles, CA In Situ and Air Stripping Philip LaMon 310-328-9433 Demonstration Completed 1989 Praxis Environmental Services Burlingame, CA In Situ Steam Enhanced Extraction Lloyd Stewart 415-641-9044 Demonstration Completed 1997 Pulse Sciences, San Leandro, CA X-Ray Treatment (Aqueous) Vernon Bailey 510-632-5100 ext 227 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 X-Ray Treatment (Soils) Vernon Bailey 510-632-5100 ext 227 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Radian Corporation (formerly AWD Technologies, lnc) Walnut Creek, CA Integrated Vapor Extraction and Steam Vacuum Stripping David Bluestein 415-227-0822 Demonstration Completed 1990 Regenesis San Clemente, CA Biological Treatment of Organics Dr Stephen Koeningberg 949-366-8000 Demonstration Completed 2002 Retech, lnc Ukiah, CA Plasma Arc Vitrification Ronald Womack Leroy B Leland 707-462-6522 Demonstration Completed 1991 Rochem Separation Systems, lnc Torrance, CA Rochem Disc Tube Module System David LaMomca 310-370-3160 Demonstration Completed 1994 Roy F Weston Sherman Oaks, CA In-Well Air Stripping Jeff Bannon 818-971-4900 Eric Klingel 704-660-1673 Demonstration Completed 1994 Simulprobe Technologies, lnc Novato, CA Core Barrel Soil Sampler Richard Laton 415-883-8787 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1997 SIVE Services Dixon, CA Steam Injection and Vacuum Extraction Douglas Dieter 916-678-8358 Demonstration Exited 4 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Qilifornhi (oinliinicil) SRI Instruments Torrance, CA Portable Gas Chromatograph Douglas Gavilanes 310-214-5092 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 State of California Biphasic Lime Treatment Chns Stetler 530-542-5461 Demonstration Completed 2004 Steam Tech Environmental Services Bakersfield, CA In Situ Thermal (Steam Injection) Hank Sowers 661-322-6478 Demonstration Completed 2003 Terra-Kleen Response Group, Inc Del Mar, CA Solvent Extraction Alan Cash 619-558-8762 Demonstration Completed 1997 Texaco, Inc S El Monte, CA Entrained-Bed Gasification John Wintor 310-908-7387 Demonstration Completed 1994 Thermatnx, Inc (Formerly Purus, Inc) San Jose, CA Photolytic Oxidation Steve McAdams 408-453-0490 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 U S EPA Region LX San Francisco, CA Excavation and Foam Suppression of Volatiles John Blevins 415-744-2400 Demonstration Completed 1990 U S Filter (formerly Ultrox) Santa Ana, CA Ultraviolet Radiation and Oxidation John Lowry 412-722-1247 Demonstration Completed 1989 Weiss Associates Emeryville, CA Electrochemical Geoxidation Joe Lovenitti 510-450-6141 Demonstration Completed 2003 Xon Tech, Inc Van Nuys, CA Xon Tech Sector Sampler Matt Young 818-787-7380 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1991 X-19 Biological Products, Inc Santa Clara, CA Microbial Degradation of PCBs Paul E Gill 408-970-9485 Demonstration Completed 2002 (jilonuli) CF Systems Corporation Arvada, CO Solvent Extraction L V Benningfield 303-420-1550 Demonstration Completed 1988 Batch Organics Extraction Unit L V Benningfield 303-420-1550 Demonstration Completed 1988 Colorado Dept of Health, Denver, CO Wetland-Based T reatment for Mineral Mine Drainage Jim Lewis 303-692-3390 Demonstration Completed 1999 Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO and Colorado Department of Health Denver, CO Wetlands-Based Treatment Thomas Wildeman 303-273-3642 Emerging Technology Completed 1998 General Environmental Corporation Englewood, CO Electrocoagulation Carl Dalrymple 303-761-6960 Demonstration Completed 1995 5 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status 1 i (Niloniilu (continued) Pintail Systems, Inc Aurora, CO Biodegradation of Cyanide Caren Caldwell 303-367-8443 Demonstration Completed 1998 Biostabilization of Lead Leslie Thompson 303-367-8443 Demonstration Completed 2000 Biostabilization of Mercury Mining Wastes Leslie Thompson 303-367-8443 Demonstration Completed 2000 Biological Stabilization of Arsenic in Soils Leslie Thompson 303-367-8443 Demonstration Completed 2000 Region 8 and State of Colorado Multiple Innovative Passive Mine Drainage Technologies Victor Kettellapper 303-312-6578 Demonstration Completed 2001 Rocky Mountain Remediation Services Golden, CO Environmental Soil Amendment (Stabilization) Jim Barthel 303-215-6620 Demonstration Completed 2000 Smith Environmental Technologies Corporation (formerly Canonie Environmental Services Corp) Englewood, CO Low Temperature Thermal Aeration Joseph Hutton 303-790-1747 Demonstration Completed 1992 Anaerobic Thermal Processor Joseph Hutton 303-790-1747 Demonstration Completed 1991 (.'(JIllRTlkilt Dexsil Corporation Hamden, CT 4 Demonstrations Environmental Test Kits (PCB) Chlor-N-Soil L2000 PCB/Chlonde Analyzer Jack Mahon 203-288-3509 Momtonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 University of Connecticut Storrs, CT Pe rmanganate/Persu 1 fate Oxidation Treatment for PCE George Hoag 860-486-2781 Demonstration Completed 2007 Milestone Monroe, CT Thermal Decomposition, Atomic Absorption Stephen Billets US EPA 702-798-2232 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 E I DuPont de Nemours and Co and Oberlin Filter Co Newark, DE and Waukesha, WI Membrane Microfiltration Ernest Mayer 302-774-2277 Demonstration Completed 1990 Hewlett-Packard (formerly MTI Analytical Instru- ments) Wilmington, DE Portable Gas Chromatograph Hewlett-Packard 800-227-9770 Bob Belair 302-633-8487 Momtonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 6 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status l)cl:m':irc Remediation Technology Development Forum, HSRC Baton Rouge, LA Innovative Capping Design Richard Jensen 302-695-4685 Demonstration Completed 2006 Strategic Diagnostics Inc (formerly Ensys, lnc) Immunoassay for PCP T 1m Lawruk 800-544-8881 302-456-6782 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 Newark, DE Immunoassay and Colonmetry for Dioxin Bob Ferguson 1-800-544-8881 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2004 Hnrid:i Funderburk and Associates Apollo Beach, FL Dechlorination and Immobilization Ray Funderburk 800-723-8847 Demonstration Completed 1997 High Voltage Environmental Applications, Inc /Florida International University and University of Miami Miami, FL High-Energy Electron Irradiation (Aqueous) William Cooper 910-962-3450 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1993 Completed 1994 High Voltage Environmental Applications, Inc Miami, FL High Energy Electron Irradiation (Solids) William Cooper 305-593-5330 Emerging Technology Completed 1996 PCP, Inc West Palm Beach, FL Ion Mobility Spectrometry Martin Cohen 407-683-0507 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1991 American Combustion, Inc Norcross, GA PYRETRON Thermal Destruction Gregory Gitman 404-564-4180 Demonstration Completed 1988 ETG , Inc Norcross, GA Long-Path Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer Orman Simpson 404-242-0977 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 Sonotech, Inc Atlanta, GA Frequency Tunable Pulse Combustion System Ben Zinn 404-894-3033 Demonstration Completed 1995 Williams Environmental Services, Inc (Formerly Harmon Environmental Services, Stone Mountain, GA Soil Washing S Jackson Hubbard (U S EPA) 513-569-7507 Emerging Technology Exited 1992 University of Hawaii Intermittent Up-Flow Anaerobic Bioreactor (1UFAB) George Moore 513-569-7444 Demonstration Completed 2008 7 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status l(l;iho Aquatic Research Instruments Lemhi, ID Sediment Core Sampler Will Young 208-768-2222 Monitoring and Measurement Completed 1999 Aquatic Research Instruments Lemhi, ID Russian Peat Borer Will Young 208-768-2222 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1999 Argonne National Laboratory West Idaho Fall, ID Phytoremediation of Radionuclides Scott Lee 208-533-7829 Demonstration Completed 2003 Art's Manufacturing and Supply American Falls, ID AMS™ Dual-Tube Liner Soil Sampler Brian Anderson 800-635-7330 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1997 AMS™ Split Core Sampler Brian Anderson 800-635-7330 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1999 J R Simplot Co Pocatello, ID Anaerobic Biological Process Russell Kaakc 208-235-5620 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Anaerobic Biological Process Tom Yergovich 209-858-2511 Demonstration Completed 1994 Morrison Knudsen Corp /STG Technologies Boise, ID Grouting Technique Kathryn Levihn Rick Raymond) 208-386-6115 Demonstration Completed 1996 Process Technologies, Inc Boise, ID Photolytic Destruction of SVE Off-gases Michael Swan 208-385-0900 Demonstration Exited US DOE/Duke Engineering Lockheed, ID Surfactant Enhanced Acquifer Remediation Michael Shook 208-526-6945 Demonstration Completed 1999 Illinois Allied Signal Corporation Des Plains, IL Submerged Aerobic Fixed Film Reactor Steve Lupton 708-391-3500 Demonstration Completed 1998 Argonne National Laboratory East Chicago, IL Phyroremediation of Radionuclides Christina Negri Demonstration Completed 2003 GTI Des Plaines, IL Evaluation of Treatment of PCB-Contaminated Sediments for Beneficial Re-Use Mike Mensinger 847-768-0602 Demonstration Completed 2007 Oxford Instruments XRF Analyzer Ruhre Gehnen Momtonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 8 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Illinois (continued) GTI Des Plaines, IL Chemical and Biological Treatment Mike Mensinger 847-768-0602 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Fluid Extraction- Biological Degradation Process Mike Mensinger 847-768-0602 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Fluidized-Bed Cyclonic Agglomerating Incinerator Mike Mensinger 847-768-0602 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 GTI Des Plaines, IL Superficial Extraction/Liquid Phase Oxidation of Waste Mike Mensinger 847-768-0602 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 OHM Environmental (formerly RUST Remedial Services, Inc) Lombard, IL X-TRAX Thermal Desorption Dick Aycn 803-646-2413 Demonstration Completed 1992 Recycling Sciences, Inc Chicago, IL Desorption and Vapor Extraction System William Meenan 312-663-4269 Demonstration Completed Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems (formerly Chemical Waste Management) Schaumburg, IL Evaporation and Chemical Oxidation Bob Hernquist 708-706-6900 Demonstration Completed 1 (id i:i nil Bio-Rem, Inc Butler, IN Augmented In Situ Subsurface Bioremediation Process David Mann 219-868-5823 800-428-4626 Demonstration Completed 1993 Geoprobe Salina, KS Soil, Water, Vapor Sampling Cone Penetrometer Wes McCall Tom Omli 800-436-7762 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc Munster, IN Chemical Stabilization of Mercury Mining Wastes Steve Chisick 219-836-0116 Demonstration Exited Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc Munster, IN MAECT1TE® Treatment Process Chuck McPheeters 219-836-0116 Demonstration Completed 2000 Soil Tech, ATP Systems Inc Porter, IN Thermal Desorption Joe Hutton 219-926-8651 Demonstration Completed 1992 Iowa Clements Associates, JMCEnvmonmanlalist'sSubsoil Inc Probe Jim Clements 515-792-8285 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1999 9 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status IKmmgffta Geoprobe Systems Salina, KS Large Bore Soil Sampler Wesley McCall Tom Omli 800-436-7762 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1999 QScstdOtdsT^ Microsensor System, Inc Bowling Green, KY Portable Gas Chromatograph Norman Davis 502-752-1353 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 (UmftfliiiHi Advanced Remediation Mixing, Inc (formerly Chemfix Technologies, Inc ) Kenner, LA Solidification and Stabilization Sam Pizzitola 504-461-0466 Demonstration Completed 1989 Electrokinetics, Inc Baton Rouge, LA Electrokinetic Remediation Elif Acar 504-388-3992 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1989 Exited Electro-Klean Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Elif Acar 504-753-8004 Emerging Technology Exited SBP Technologies, Inc Baton Rouge, LA Membrane Separation and Bioremediation Clayton Page 504-755-7711 Demonstration Completed 1995 SOjftlG Cape Technologies South Portland, ME DFI Immunoassay for Dioxin Bob Harrison 207-741-2995 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 2004 SOjBjtanl) Quadrel Services, Inc Clarksburg, MD Emflux® Soil-Gas Survey System Bruce Tucker Paul Henning 301-874-5510 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1997 W L Gore and Associates, Inc Elkton, MD Gore-Scrubber® Passive Soil Gas Sampler Ray Fenstermacher 410-392-7600 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1997 SfammltiTwma ABB Environmental Services, Inc Wakefield, MA Anaerobic/ Aerobic Sequential Bioremediation Willard Murray 617-245-6606 Emerging Technology Completed 1998 Harding Lawson Associates (formerly ABB Environmental Services, Inc ) Wakefield, MA Two-Zone Plume Interception In Situ Treatment Strategy Jaret Johnson Willard Murray 617-245-6606 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 10 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status M:iss;u'ImiscI1s (ciinlimii'd) Harding-Lawson Engineers Wakefield, MA In Situ Anerobic-aerotic Bioremediation William Murray 617-245-6606 Demonstration Completed 1998 Bruker Instruments Billenca, MA Bruker Mobile Environmental Monitor Dr Brian Abraham 508-667-9580 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 HNU Systems, Inc Newtown, MA Portable Gas Chromatograph Jack Dnscoll 800-724-6690 617-964-6690 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 HNU Systems, Inc Newtown, MA Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Jack Dnscoll 800-724-6690 617-964-6690 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 Innov-X Systems, Inc Woburn, MA XRF Analyzer Rose Koch 781-938-5005 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 K.SE, Inc Amherst, MA Air II Photocatalytic Technology for Air Streams James Kittrell 413-549-5506 Demonstration Completed 1999 Maxymillian Technologies, Inc (formerly Clean Berkshires) Lanesboro, MA High Temperature Thermal Process Jim Maxymillian 413-499-3050 Demonstration Completed 1993 Millipore Corporation Bedford, MA EnviroGard PCB Immunoassay Test Kit Alan Weiss 617-275-9200 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 Immunoassay for PCP (Soil, Water) Alan Weiss 617-275-9200 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 Niton Corporation Bedford, MA Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Don Sackett 781-275-9275 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 Niton Corp Billenca, MA X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer Debbie Schatzlein Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 XRF Analyzer Debbie Schatzlein Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1998 Ohmicron Corporation Newton, MA Immunoassay for PCP in Soil Mary Hayes 215-860-5115 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 PSI Technology Co Andover, MA Immobilize and Decontaminate Metals in Aggregate Solids Joseph Morency 508-689-0003 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Rontel USA, Inc Carlisle, MA XRF Analyzer Paul Smith 978-266-2900 Monitonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 Terra-Therm LLC Fitchburg, MA In Situ Thermal Ralph Baker 978- 343-0300 Demonstration Completed 2002 11 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Sftnssrdlrrcnms (Jwinrihuralty UV Technologies, Inc (formerly Energy and Environmental Engineering, Inc) East Cambridge, MA Laser-Induced Photochemical Oxidative Destruction John Roll James Porter 617-666-5500 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg, MS Phytoremediation Steve Rock 513-569-7149 Demonstration Completed 2003 Limnotech Ann Arbor, MI In Situ Hydrogen-Enhanced Remediation John Wolfe 734-332-1200 Demonstration Completed 1999 smmBHua BioTrol Inc Eden Praine, MN Biotreatmcnt of Groundwater Dennis Chilcote 612-942-8032 Demonstration Completed 1989 BioTrol, Inc Eden Prame, MN Methanotropic Bioreactor System Durell Dobbins 612-942-8032 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 BioTrol, Inc Eden Praine, MN Biological Aqueous Treatment System Durell Dobbins 612-942-8032 Demonstration Completed 1989 BioTrol, Inc Eden Prame, MN Soil Washing System Dennis Chilcote 612-942-8032 Demonstration Completed 1989 Membrane Corporation Minneapolis, MN Membrane Gas Transfer in Waste Remediation Charles Gantzer 612-378-2160 Emerging Technology exited Mfiaamnfl COGN1S TERRA MET Gross, MO Removal of Lead from Soils Lou Magdits 573-626-3476 Demonstration Completed 1994 SftntfBDH) Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology Butte, MT Air-Sparged Hydrocyclone Theodore Jordan 406-496-4112 406-496-4193 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 Campbell Centrifugal Jig Gordon Ziesing 406-496-1573 406-496-4193 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE Spray Irrigation Ray Spalding 402-483-3931 Demonstration Completed 1996 US EPA Las Vegas, NV Field Analytical Screening Program (FASP) Howard Fnbush 703-603-8831 Larry Jack 702-798-2373 Demonstration Completed 1996 12 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status SScwaito University of Nevada, Reno Reno, NV Passive Constructed Wetlands Tim Tsukamoto 775-784-4413 Demonstration Completed 2004 JSssy (KkDHJSQfiRS XDD, LLC Stratham, NH In Situ Chemical Oxidation Ken Sperry 484-224-3031 Demonstration Completed 2006 Newfields Corporation Madison, WI Cool-Ox Technology Paul McCauley 513-569-7444 Demonstration Completed 2007 Accutech Inc Keyport, NJ and New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injection John Liskowitz 908-739-6444 Demonstration Completed 1992 ART International, Inc (formerly Enviro Sciences, Inc) Denville, NJ Low-Energy Solvent Extraction Process Werner Sterner 201-627-7601 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 Dehydro-Tech Corporation Somerville, NJ Carver-Greenfield Process for Extraction of Oily Waste Theodore Trowbridge 908-904-1606 Demonstration Completed 1991 Geotech Development Corporation Newark, NJ Cold Top Vitrification William Libnzzi 201-596-5846 Thomas Tate 610-337-8515 Demonstration Exited Envirogen, Inc Lawrenceville, NJ Microbial Degradation/ Solvent Extraction Ronald Unterman (609) 936-9300 Demonstration Completed 2000 Metorex Ewing, NJ XRF John Patterson 609-406-9000 Momtonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 M L ENERGIA, Inc Princeton, NJ Reductive Photo- Dechlonnation Treatment Moshe Lavid 609-799-7970 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 M L ENERGIA, Inc Princeton, NJ Reductive Photo-Thermal Oxidation Processes for Chlorocarbons Moshe Lavid 609-799-7970 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 New Jersey Institute of Technology, Hazardous Substance Management Research Center Newark, NJ Pneumatic Fracturing/ Bioremediation John Schunng 201-596-5849 David Kosson 908-445-4346 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ and GeoTech Development Corporation King of Prussia, PA Cold Top Vitrification William Libnzzi 201-596-5846 Thomas Tate 610-337-8515 Demonstration Exited 13 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status New Jersey (mil 1 iniii'd) New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ GHEA Associates Process Itzhak Gottlieb 201-226-4642 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Phytotech, Inc Monmouth, NJ Phytoextraction of Metal From Soil Burt Ensley 908-438-0900 Demonstration Completed 1998 Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc Ridgefield, NJ Portable Gas Chromatograph Amos Linenberg 201-945-3694 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 Solucorp Saddleback, NJ Molecular Bonding System Robert Kuhn 914-623-2333 Demonstration Completed 1997 New Mexico Billings and Associates, Inc Albuquerque, NM Subsurface Volatilization and Ventilation System Gale Billings 505-345-1116 Don Brenneman 713-676-5324 Demonstration Completed 1994 Commodore Advanced Sciences, Inc Albuquerque, NM Set Process for PCBs in soil Mark Jones 505-872-6803 Demonstration Completed 2000 Resource Management and Recovery (formerly Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc) Las Cruces, NM AlgaSorb Biological Sorption Mike Hosea 505-382-9228 Emerging Technology Completed 1990 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM Electrokinetic Extraction in Unsaturated Soils Eric Lindgren 505-844-3820 Earl Mattson 505-856-3311 Demonstration Completed 1999 Thermo Nutech (formerly TMA Eberline) Albuquerque, NM Segmented Gate System for Radioactive Materials Jeff Brown 423-481-0683 Emerging Technology Completed 1997 New York Pasacelsian Ithaca, NY Cellular Receptor Immunoassay for Dioxin Amy Hall 888-689-4224 Monitoring and Measurement Technology Completed 2004 Photovac International, Inc Deer Park, NY Portable Gas Chromatograph Mark Collins 516-254-4199 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 SBP Technologies, Inc White Plains, NY Bioventing, Air Sparging, Biological Treatment for Ground Water (multi- developer project with State of New York) Richard Desrosiers 914-694-2280 Nick Kolak 518-457-3372 Demonstration Completed 1995 14 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status New York (lonliniii'il) RECRA Environmental, Inc (formerly Electro-Pure Systems, Inc) Amherst, NY Alternating Current Electrocoagulation Technology Kenneth Kinecki 800-527-3272 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 State University of New York at Oswego Oswego, NY Photocatalytic Treatment for Sediments Ronald Scrudato Jeffrey Shiarenzelli 315-341-3639 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Texaco Syngas, Inc White Plains, NY Gasification Process John Winter 316-251-4000 ext 536 Demonstration Completed 1994 Xcalibur XRF Services, Inc Islandia, NY XRF Analyzers 631-435-9749 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 Xerox Corporation Webster, NY Ground Water Extraction Ron Hess 716-422-3694 Phil Mook 916-643-5443 Demonstration Completed 1995 North Ointliii;) Hybnzyme Raleigh, NC Immunoassay and Colorimetry for Dioxin Randy Allen 919-783-9595 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2004 MT1, Inc Wilmington, NC Anodic Stripping Voltametry Stephen Billets U S EPA 702-798-2232 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 Xenobiotics Durham, NC Cell Based Immunoassay for Dioxin Jeff Sturkey 919-688-4804 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Competed 2004 Ohio ASC/EMR Wnght Patterson AFB Dayton, OH Phytoremediation of TCE in Groundwater Greg Harvey 513-255-7716 Demonstration Completed 1998 AquaBlok® Toledo, OH Sediment Capping Technology Edwin Barth 513-569-7669 Demonstration Completed 2006 Ohio Babock and Wilcox Alliance Research Center Alliance, OH Cyclone Vitrification Lawrence King 216-829-7576 Demonstration Completed 1991 Battel le Memorial Institute Columbus, OH In Situ Electroacoustic Soil Decontamination Satya Chauhan 614-424-4812 Emerging Technology Completed 2000 15 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Oliin (iiinlimicil) Battelle Memonal Institute Columbus, OH Treatability Study Evaluation of Dodge Pond Subaqueous Cap Paul Randall 513-569-7673 Demonstration Completed 2008 Commodore Environmental Columbus, Ohio Solvated Electron Treatment of Chlorinated Organics Neil Dronby 614-297-0365 Demonstration Completed 1996 Ferro Corporation Independence, OH Waste Vitrification Through Electric Melting S K Muralidhar 216-641-8580 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 IT Corporation Cincinnati, OH Chelation/ Electro-deposition of Toxic Metals from Soil Radha ICnshnan 513-782-4700 Emerging Technology Completed 1996 IT Corporation (formerly OHM Remediation Services Corp) Findlay, OH Oxygen Microbubble In Situ Bioremediation Douglas Jerger 423-690-3211 Emerging Technology Completed 1998 Monsanto/ Dupont Cincinnati, OH In Situ Electroosmosis of TCE in Soil/ Groundwaters "Lasagna Process" Thomas Holdsworth 513-569-7675 Demonstration Completed 1998 Ohio Lumex Co Twinsburg, OH Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Stephen Billets U S EPA 702-798-2232 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 2003 University of Dayton Research Institute Dayton, OH Photothermal Detoxification Unit (PDU) Berry Dellinger John Graham 513-229-2846 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 U S EPA Mobile Volume Reduction Unit Cincinnati, Ohio Soil Washing Richard Griffith 908-321-6629 Demonstration Completed 1992 U S EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, OH Bioventing Paul McCauley 513-569-7444 Demonstration Completed 1997 U S EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, OH Triad Site Characterization of Vapor Intrusion Michelle Simon 513-569-7469 Demonstration Completed 2006 U S EPA NRMRL and ETG Environmental Cincinnati, OH Base-Catalyzed Dechlorination Process George Huffman 513-569-7341 Yei-Shong Shieh 215-832-0700 Demonstration Completed 1993 U S EPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory and IT Corporation Cincinnati, OH Debris Washing System Michael Taylor 513-782-4700 Demonstration Completed 1990 16 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status (SfttoiJsinrftaK® U S EPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory and FRX, Inc Cincinnati, OH Hydraulic Fracturing William Slack 513-469-6040 Demonstration Completed 1992 U S EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, OH Alternate Cover Assessment Program (ACAP) Steve Rock 513-569-7149 Demonstration Completed 2001 U S EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, OH Base Catalyzed Decomposition Terry Lyons 513-569-7589 Demonstration Completed 2004 (HMteflmnffl Geo-Microbial Technologies Ochelata, OK. Technology for Metals Release and Removal from Wastes Donald Hitzman 918-535-2281 Emerging Technology Completed 2001 GDckssxcd Metorex, Inc Bend, OR Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (FPXRF) Jim Pasmore 800-229-9209 541-385-6748 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 IRsmjospftsnifto Aluminum Company of America (formerly Alcoa Separations Technology, Inc) Pittsburgh, PA Bioscrubber Paul Liu 412-826-3711 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Calgon Carbon Oxidation Technologies (formerly Peroxidation Systems, Inc) Pittsburgh, PA Perox-Pure Chemical Oxidation Bertrand Dussert 412-787-6681 Demonstration Completed 1995 Center for Hazardous Materials Research Pittsburgh, PA Acid Extraction Treatment System Stephe Paff 412-826-5321 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Center for Hazardous Materials Research Pittsburgh, PA Organics Destruction and Metals Stabilization B Stephen Paff 412-826-5321 Brian Bosilovich 412-826-5321 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Concurrent Technologies (formerly Center for Hazardous Materials Research) Pittsburgh, PA Lead Smelting Brian Bosilovich 412-826-5321 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 MacTec-SPB Technologies Company Pittsburgh, PA In Well Vapor Stripping of Ground Water Mark McGlathery 800-444-6221 Demonstration Completed 1999 17 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status IVnnsylv:im;i (niiitiniii'ri) Geo-Con, lnc Monroeville, PA 2 Demonstrations In Situ Solidification/ Stabilization Linda Ward Robert Hayden 412-856-7700 Demonstration Completed 1988 Horsehead Resource Development Co lnc Monaca, PA Flame Reactor Regis Zagrocki 610-826-8810 Demonstration Completed 1991 Lewis Environmental Services, lnc Pittsburgh, PA Soil Leaching Process Tom Lewis III 412-322-8100 Emerging Technology Exited Strategic Diagnostics, lnc Newtown, PA Immunoassay for PCP Craig Kostyshyn 215-860-5115 ext 634 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 Remediation Technologies, lnc Pitsburgh, PA Slurry Biodegradation David Nakles 412-826-3340 Demonstration Completed 1991 RE Wright Middletown, PA Bioventing, Air Sparging, Biological Treatment for Ground Water (multi- developer project with State of New York) Richard Cronce 717-944-5501 Demonstration Completed 1992 Roy F Weston, lnc West Chester, PA Thermal Desorption Mike Cosmos 215-430-7423 Demonstration Completed 1992 Roy F Weston, lnc West Chester, PA Steam Regeneration Adsorption System (Ambersorb) John Thoroughgood 610-701-3728 Deborah Plantz 215-537-4061 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Vortec Corp Collegeville, PA Oxidation and Vitrification Process James Hnat 610-489-2255 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1993 Exited Smith C;ir»lin:i E&C Williams Summerville, SC Chemical Stabilization of Mercury Mining Wastes Charlie Williams 843-821-4200 Demonstration Completed 2001 | South Omiliim (continued) University of South Carolina Columbia, SC In Situ Mitigation of Acid Water Frank Caruccio 803-777-4512 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 1 I'llllCSSOl' Bergmann USA Gallatin, TN Soil and Sediment Washing Technology George Jones 615-230-2217 Demonstration Completed 1992 18 ------- Developer Technology > Contact Program Status Tciiiii'Ssit (eoiiiiiiiK'tl) Brown and Root Environmental/ Illinois Institute of Technology Oak Ridge, TN Radio Frequency Heating Clifton Blanchard 423-483-9900 Demonstration Completed 1994 Batch Steam Distillation and Metal Extraction Stuart Shealy 423-690-3211 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 IT Corporation ICnoxville, TN Eimco Biolift Slurry Reactor as developed by Tekno Associates Kandi Brown 423-690-3211 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Mixed Waste Treatment Process Ed Alpenn 615-690-3211 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 IT Corporation ICnoxville, TN Photocatalytic and Biological Soil Detoxification Duane Graves 423-690-3211 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 WASTECH, Inc Oak Ridge, TN Solidification/ Stabilization Terrence Lyons US EPA 513-569-7859 Demonstration Completed 1991 Texas Geokinetics and Duke Engineering Austin, TX Electrokinetic Flushing & Surfactant Flushing Harry Linnemeyer 512-425-2000 Steven Clark 510-704-2940 Demonstration Completed 1999 EET, Inc Bellaire, TX PCB/Metals Extraction from Porous Surfaces Tim Tarnllion 713-662-0727 Demonstration Completed 1997 ENSR Consulting Engineering and Larson Engineering Houston, TX Bioventing, Air Sparging, Biological Treatment for Ground Water (multi- developer project with the State of New York) David Ramsden (ENSR) 713-520-6802 N Sathi-yakumar 716-272-7310 Demonstration Completed 1995 Filter Flow Technology, Inc League City, TX Colloid Polishing Method Todd Johnson 713-334-6080 Demonstration Completed 1992 Fugro Geosciences, Inc Houston, TX Laser Fluorescence PAH, BTEX Screening Cone Penetrometer Andrew Taer 713-778-5580 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1996 Hanby Environmental Laboratory Wimberly, TX PCP Test Kit John Hanby 512-847-1212 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1993 Hrubetz Environmental Services, Inc Dallas, TX HRUBOUT Process Barbara Hrubetz Michael Hrubetz 214-363-7833 Demonstration Completed 1993 Rigaku, Inc Woodlands, TX XRF Analyzer John Martin 281-363-1033 Momtonng and Measurement Technologies Completed 19 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Texas (conlinnoil) Solidtech, Inc Houston, TX Solidification and Stabilization Bill Stallworth 713-497-8558 Demonstration Completed 1988 Star Organics Dallas, TX Injection Soil Amendment (Stabilization) Phil Clarke 214-522-0742 Demonstration Completed 1999 TN Spectrace Round Rock, TX Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Peter Barry 512-388-9100 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 Micro-Bac International, Inc Microbial Degradation of PCBs Todd Kenney 512-310-9000 Demonstration Completed 2002 University of Houston Houston, TX Concentrated Salt Extraction of Lead Dennis Clifford 713-743-4266 Emerging Technology Completed 1999 Western Product Recovery Group, Inc Houston, TX CCBA Physical and Chemical Treatment Donald Kelly 713-493-9321 Bert Elkins 619-749-8856 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 Utah Phytokinetics, Inc North Logan, UT Phytoremediaton of Soils An Ferro 801-750-0985 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1999 Completed 1999 Vciniiinl Green Mountain Laboratories Montpelier, VT Biodegradation of PCBs in Soils Adam Longee 802-223-1468 Demonstration Completed 2000 Virginia BioGcncsis Enterpnses, Inc Fairfax Station, VA Soil Washing/ Biological Treatment Charles Wilde 703-913-9700 Demonstration Completed 1992 BioGenesis Enterpnses, Inc Spnngfield, VA Sediment Washing System Charles Wilde 703-913-9700 Demonstration Completed 2006 BWX Tech , Inc (Affiliate of Babcock and Wilcox Co Lynchburg, VA Cyclone Furnace Evan Reynolds 804-522-6000 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1992 Completed 1991 Dynaphore, Inc Richmond, VA Removal of Dissolved Heavy Metals via FORAGER Sponge Norman Rainer 804-288-7109 Demonstration Completed 1994 ITT Industries Roanoke, VA Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Compounds Rosann Kryczkowski 540-362-7356 Demonstration Completed 1999 Wako Chemicals Richmond, VA Dioxin Elisa Kit Emmy Leung 877-714-1920 Monitoring and Measurement Technology Completed 2004 20 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Washington ECOVA Corporation Redmond, WA Bioslurry Reactor Alan Jones 206-883-1900 Demonstration Completed 1991 Geosafe Corporation Richland, WA In Situ Vitrification James Hansen Matthew Haass 509-375-0710 Demonstration Completed 1994 Ionics/ Resources Conservation Co Bellevue, WA BEST Solvent Extraction William Hines 206-828-2400 Demonstration Completed 1992 K.eeco Chemical Stabilization of Mercury Mining Wastes Amy Anderson 888-977-9156 Demonstration Completed 2001 Port of Ridgefield Ridgefield, WA Steam Enhanced Remediation Brent Grening 360-887-3873 Demonstration Completed 2005 Remediation Technologies, lnc (ReTec) Seattle, WA Methanotrophic Biofilm Reactor Hans Stroo 206-624-9349 Emerging Technology Completed 1995 Remediation Technologies, lnc (ReTec) Seattle, WA Liquid and Soils Biological Treatment Merv Cooper 206-624-9349 Demonstration Completed 1994 Scitec Corporation Richland, WA Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Steve Santy 800-466-5323 509-783-9850 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1995 University of Washington Seattle, WA Asdorptivc Filtration Mark Benjamin 206-543-7645 Emerging Technology Completed 1992 Wilder Construction Matcon Modified Asphalt Cap W Randall Garrett 800-484-9404 Demonstration Completed 2001 Wisconsin Minergy Neenah, W1 Thermal Sediment Reuse Technology Terry Carroll 920- 727-1411 Demonstration Completed 2001 Svedala Industries (formerly Allis Mineral Systems) Oak Creek, WI Pyrokiln Thermal Encapsulation Process Jim Kidd 414-798-6341 Glenn Heian 414-762-1190 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 U S EPA/ NRMRL US- DA Forest Products Lab Madison Fungus Treatment Technology Richard Lamar 608-231-9469 Demonstration Completed 1991 University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI Photoelectro-catalytic Treatment of Metals and Organics in Water Marc Anderson 608-262-2674 Charles Hill, Jr 608-263-4593 Emerging Technology Completed 1997 21 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status Western Research Institute Laramie, WY Contained Recovery of Oily Wastes (CROW) James Speight 307-721-2011 Emerging Technology Demonstration Completed 1991 Completed 1997 (Onrmrftn Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario Ultrasonic-Acid Leachate Treatment for Mixed Wastes Shiv Vijayan 613-583-3311 ext 3220/6057 Emerging Technology Completed 1996 Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario Chemical Treatment and Ultrafiltration Leo Buckley 613-584-3311 Emerging Technology Completed 1993 Cone Tech Investigations Vancouver, British Columbia Resistivity, pH, Seismic, Temperature, Cone Penetrometer Ward Phillips 604-327-4311 Monitoring and Measurement Technologies Completed 1992 ELI Ecologic International, Inc Rockwood, Ontario Thermal Gas Phase Reduction Process and Thermal Desorption Jim Nash 519-856-9591 Demonstration Completed 1992 EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc In Situ Reactive Barrier John Vogan 519-824-0432 Demonstration Completed 2000 EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc Guelph, Ontario 2 Demonstrations Metal Enhanced Abiotic Degradation William Matulewicz 609-722-6700 Demonstration Ex-situ In Situ Completed 1995 Completed 1997 Geosyntec Guelph, Ontario Emulsified Zero-valent Iron for DNAPL Remediation Suzanne O'Hara 519-822-2230 Demonstration Completed 2003 Grace Dearborn, Inc Mississauga, Ontario Duramend Process Alan Seech Paul Bucen 905-272-7480 Demonstration Completed 1994 Matrix Photocatalytic Limited (formerly Nu- tech Environmental) London, Ontario, Cana- da Ti02 Photocatalytic Treatment of Aqueous Waste Streams Bob Henderson 519-660-8669 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 Matrix Photocatalytic Limited TiOj Photocatalytic Air Treatment Bob Henderson 519-660-8669 Demonstration Completed 1995 Toronto Harbour Com- mission Toronto, Ontario Soil Recycling Dennis Lang 416-863-2047 Demonstration Completed 1992 Wastewater Technology Centre Burlington, Ontario Cross-Flow Pervaporation System Chris Lipski 905-639-6320 " Emerging Technology Completed 1992 22 ------- Developer Technology Contact Program Status C:iii;|(I:i (cnnlinucil) Zenon Environmental Systems, Inc Burlington, Ontario Bioreactor Integrated with an Ultrafiltration Membrane System Lisa Ashton 905-639-6320 ext 244 Demonstration Completed 1995 Zenon Environmental Systems, Inc Burlington, Ontario Cross-Flow Pervaporation System Phil Canning Tony Tonelli 905-639-6320 Demonstration Completed 1995 Zenon Environmental Systems, Inc Burlington, Ontario ZenoGem Process Chris Lipski 905-639-6320 Demonstration Completed 1995 Kiijjuml/I nilt'd Kingdom AEA Technology (for- merly Warren Spring Laboratory) Oxfordshire, England Physical and Chemical Treatment Steve Barber 011-44-1235- 463062 Emerging Technology Completed 1994 Graseby Ionics, Limited Waterford Herts, Eng- land Ion Mobility Spectrometry John Brokenshire 011-44-1923- 816166 Martin Cohen 561-683-0507 Monitoring and Measure- ment Technologies Completed 1990 Icily Gruppo Italimpresse (developed by Shirco Infrared Systems, Inc) (formerly ECOVA) Rome, Italy 2 Demonstrations Infrared Thermal Destruction John Cioffi 206-883-1900 Demonstration Completed 1987 1'iicrln Uii'o Terra Vac, Inc San Juan, PR In Situ Vacuum Extraction James Malot 787-725-8750 Demonstration Completed 1988 23 ------- |